2017-01-03 Council Packet1. Call to Order
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
January 3, 2017 — 7:00 pm
Mendota Heights City Hall
2. Oath of Office
— Mayor Neil Garlock and Councilmembers Joel Paper and Jay Miller
3. Roll Call
4. Pledge of Allegiance
5. Adopt Agenda
6. Consent Agenda
a. Approval of December 20, 2016 City Council Minutes
b. Acknowledgement of December 21, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes
c. Designation of Official Newspaper
d. Approve Resolution 2017-01 Approval of 2017 Fee Schedule
e. Approve 2017 Financial Items
• Resolution 2017-03 Establishing 2017 City Depositories of Funds
• Resolution 2017-04 Accepting Pledged Securities for 2017
• Authorize Finance Director to Execute Electronic Payments and Prepay Claims
f. Approve Resolution 2017-09 Reappointment of Commissioners to Planning Commission,
Parks and Recreation Commission, Airport Relations Commission
g. Approve Resolution 2017-02 Final Payment and Accept City Hall Drainage Work
h. Approve Resolution 2017-07 Authorization to Execute an Agreement with MN Task Force
One Urban Search and Rescue Team (MN -TF1)
i. Appointment of Representative to Dakota Co Domestic Preparedness Committee for 2017
j. Approval of Claims List
7. Public Comments
8. Presentations - None
9. Public Hearings - None
10. New and Unfinished Business
a. Resolution 2017-05 Accept Feasibility Report and Call for a Public Hearing — Kensington
Neighborhood
b. Resolution 2017-06 Accept Feasibility Report and Call for a Public Hearing — Mendota
Heights Road
c. Discussion Relating to Allowing Domestic Chickens
d. Affirm the Hire of Kelly McCarthy as Police Chief and Approve Resolution 2017-08
Employment Agreement
e. Designation of Councilmembers to serve on Fire Officer Selection Committee
f. Designation of 2017 Acting Mayor
g.
City Council Appointments to Commissions, Resolution 2017-10 Appointments to NDC4,
and Establish Date for Interviews for Park & Rec Commission Applicants
11. Community Announcements
12. Council Comments
13. Adjourn
cowman'
in
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 3
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
January 3, 2017
Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
Oath of Office—Mayor, City Council
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
At the January 3rd meeting of the City Council, the following individuals will take the Oath of
Office:
Neil Garlock, Mayor
Jay Miller, City Council
Joel Paper, City Council.
page 4
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krebsbach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present:
Councilmembers Duggan, Petschel, and Norton. Councilmember Povolny arrived at 7:55 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
RECOGNITION OF MAYOR KREBSBACH
AND COUNCILMEMBERS POVOLNY AND NORTON
On behalf of the City of Mendota Heights, staff, and the Council, Councilmember Duggan presented
Mayor Krebsbach and Councilmember Norton with gifts of appreciation for their service to the City.
Councilmember Petschel, speaking from her heart, expressed her appreciation for the privilege of
working with Mayor Krebsbach and Councilmember Norton. She also shared experiences,
accomplishments, skills learned, and relationships with each of them.
Councilmember Petschel then presented each of them with a plaque of recognition and appreciation
from the City.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Krebsbach presented the agenda for adoption. Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of the
agenda.
Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Absent: 1 (Povolny)
page 5
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Krebsbach presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and
approval. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and
authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein.
a. Approval of December 6, 2016 City Council Minutes
b. Approve Tobacco License Renewals
c. Approval of Banking Authorization Signatory Change
d. Approve Resolution 2016-103 Rescinding Term Limits for Membership on NDC4 Cable
Commission
e. Approval of Firefighter Appointments
f. Authorize Purchase of Turnout Gear
g. Approve Purchase of Lexipol Policy Manual for the Police Department
h. Approve Resolution 2016-104 Granting a Temporary Permit to MnDOT for TH110 City -owned
Rights of Way, and Drainage and Utility Easements
i. Approve Resolution 2016-102 Accepting Work and Approving Final Payment for the Marie Avenue
& 35E Storm Sewer Improvements
j. Acknowledgement of November 2016 Fire Synopsis
k. Approval of Claims List
Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Absent: 1 (Povolny)
There were no public comments.
No items scheduled.
No items scheduled.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC HEARING
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF FIRE CHIEF
City Administrator Mark McNeill explained that staff received a Letter of Retirement from Mr. John
Maczko, Fire Chief, noting that he would be stepping down as Fire Chief effective February 28, 2017.
Mr. Maczko has been a firefighter for more than 39 years. He has been Fire Chief since 1985.
page 6
While he was chief, he has overseen the recruitment and training of dozens of firefighters and the
Mendota Heights Fire Department has also been awarded the Minnesota Fire Department of the Year
twice, most recently this last year.
The replacement process is recommended to be an internal promotion. Staff recommended approval of
the notice of the availability be posted. Anyone in the department who is interested could then apply for
the position by December 30, 2016. At the next Council meeting, staff will recommend that a selection
committee be appointed which would include two members of the City Council, members of the fire
department, a chief from an adjacent city, the Police Chief, and the City Administrator.
Mayor Krebsbach took this opportunity to express her appreciation to Chief Maczko and publicly thank
him for his outstanding service to the community.
Fire Chief John Maczko came forward and stated his appreciation for the opportunity to serve with such
a great fire department and with great firefighters.
Councilmember Petschel provided expressions of appreciation and well wishes to Chief Maczko.
Councilmember Duggan moved to accept with regret the resignation of John Maczko as Mendota
Heights Fire Chief, effective February 28, 2017.
Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Absent: 1 (Povolny)
Councilmember Petschel moved to direct that a job posting of the Fire Chief vacancy be made, and
forwarded to the firefighters.
Councilmember Norton seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Absent: 1 (Povolny)
B) APPROVE LOGIS AGREEMENT FOR IT SERVICES
City Administrator Mark McNeill explained that the City has been operating without an IT professional
since the former IT manager resigned in August. Since that time, staff has been able to get by with using
LOGIS, however the City needs to look for something more permanent. A number of options have been
reviewed.
LOGIS is a consortium of mostly municipalities in the Twin Cities area; there are 40 different
jurisdictions that are partnering on that. The City of Mendota Heights has been using LOGIS for
maintenance needs and for updates; however, the City needs to look at where it would be going from
here.
A proposal to serve as the city's IT professional full-time was received from LOGIS. This would
provide the City everything from the IT help desk issues to longer-term strategic planning LOGIS has
page 7
given the City an estimate based on the number of hours they believe they would have to invest. The
total cost in the proposal is $114,000 and the 2017 budget amount for IT professionals is $131,000. They
have proposed to have meetings with City staff every other week to see how things are going and a
review in four months.
Councilmember Duggan asked what LOGIS would be able to do for the City that is not now being done.
Administrator McNeill replied that since August the City has been "treading water"; and hasn't been
able to look at what the longer-term issues are; it has been only doing maintenance as needed. However,
a more proactive approach is needed to prevent problems in the future and to ensure that the investment
made in the IT structure remains. The agreement with LOGIS would begin on January 1; however,
LOGIS is available. It and the City have explored the possible transition during the preceding couple of
weeks.
Councilmember Petschel asked for clarification that management of IT would fall under the new
Assistant City Administrator. Administrator McNeill replied that she would be the contact person from
the City to LOGIS.
Councilmember Duggan moved to approve the LOGIS agreement for IT services.
Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Absent: 1 (Povolny)
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Mark McNeill made the following announcements:
• City Hall will be closed on December 23rd , December 26th, and also January 2, 2017.
• The ice rinks opened earlier that day --December 20, 2016.
• Christmas lights can be recycled at City Hall.
• The City is accepting applications for the two vacancies on the Parks & Recreation Commission.
Applications due by December 30, 2016.
COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMENTS
City Administrator Mark McNeill recognized Mayor -elect Neil Garlock who was in attendance, and
Council -elect Joel Paper and Jay Miller who will be starting their job on January 2, 2017.
He also shared the Athenian Oath, which was first used more than 2,000 years ago by the City of Athens
for their residents, to instill loyalty and commitment to their City. It continues to be used as a timeless
code for civic responsibility.
Councilmember Duggan shared a poem he hoped would bring memories back to people that had run into
challenges.
Councilmember Petschel gave a special thank you to the staff as they have been working short-handed
for a long time. She also wished the residents Happy Holidays.
page 8
Mayor Krebsbach, closing out 24 years of elected life, stated that this is a good moment in terms of
things coming together. She read prepared comments to ensure proper recognition of people and events.
She also noted things that she looks back on in terms of how she made decisions:
• The new should never take away from what is already there
• The plan needs to connect; whatever is coming in needs to connect with what is existing
She then provided examples of these decisions in action, what she would like to see happen in the future,
and provided expressions of appreciation.
Councilmember Povolny arrived at the meeting and thanked staff.
Councilmember Duggan presented Councilmember Povolny with a gift of appreciation and
Councilmember Petschel presented a plaque of appreciation from the City. As she did with Mayor
Krebsbach and Councilmember Norton, she shared experiences and accomplishments with
Councilmember Povolny.
ADJOURN
Councilmember Duggan moved to adjourn.
Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Krebsbach adjourned the meeting at 8:09 p.m.
Sandra Krebsbach
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith
City Clerk
page 9
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMIS SON MINUTES
November 21, 2016
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday,
November 21, 2016 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M.
The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Jr., Commissioners Howard
Roston, Michael Noonan, Doug Hennes, Mary Magnuson, and Brian Petschel. Those absent:
Christine Costello
Staff Present: Consulting Planner Phil Carlson, City Administrator Mark McNeill
Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as submitted.
Approval of October 25, 2016 Minutes
COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 2016, AS PRESENTED.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
ABSENT: 1
Hearings
A) DISCUSS ISSUES AND ORDINANCE OPTIONS RELATING TO DOMESTIC
CHICKENS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Consulting Planner Phil Carlson, AICP gave the highlights of the staff report by stating that
discussion on this issue has occurred in recent past. He also noted that he personally takes
advantage of his neighbors who bring him fresh eggs on occasion but he would try not to let that
sway his recommendations.
The issue has come up with a number of residents approaching the City Council requesting that
action be taken. The issue is that, currently in the City only domestic animals (cats, dogs, etc.)
are allowed in the City. No other kinds of farm animals are allowed in the residential areas. The
City Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider it and staff has then worked with
some of these residents who had ideas and suggestions. In the memo of December 21 staff
outlined several things:
• Residents are interested in having healthy fresh food
page 10
• Other surrounding communities are allowing chickens in residential areas with
restrictions
Approaches to Regulating Chickens in Residential Areas
Currently in the Mendota Heights City Code, they simply are not allowed because the code is
silent on it.
1. Zoning Approach
In other communities where they are allowed they are mostly covered by a zoning ordinance
and they are then included as an accessory use to residential uses; typically issues addressed
are clearly defined numbers of chickens allowed and regulations on where, kind of structure,
the setback requirements, etc.
2. Animal Control Approach
The City of Edina has a very different approach, which is simply to regulate them under the
Animal Control Ordinance, which regulates stray dogs and what is done if there are
dangerous animals around. It simply lists the kinds of animals that could and could not be
had and then says `except for four or six domestic chickens which may be kept'.
As far as on the ground, if that were to be allowed in Mendota Heights, you may not see any
difference if they have them in their backyards. What would be different would be the
enforcement and how the City would handle that if there were problems or issues.
Planner Carlson did not go through is memorandum line by line since it only outlined the two
approaches that could be taken. However, he did mention specifically the concern that he heard
when speaking with city staff and with the Chief of Police. Currently, in the City the Chief of
Police is the designated Animal Warden and is responsible for dealing with problem animals,
typically stray dogs. Most of this authority then is handed off to an outside agency for
approximately $3,000/year. This agency then would go out and actually take care of these kinds
of problem animals. This is on a complaint basis as there is no regular patrolling of the City for
this kind of issue. It was the Chief's concern, and others, that this would create a problem for
enforcement for which there is currently no budget and no staff specifically directed to do it. So
this is something that the planner position and a zone enforcement role could take up; it is
something that a police officer or community officer or other designated person could handle if it
were under the animal control portion of the code.
If the zoning approach were recommended, then the code would be amended in several places to
allow the keeping of chickens as an accessory use; just like a storage shed or garage. In the
single-family residential districts chickens would be added to the definition of domestic animals;
chicken coops would be added to the definition of animal kennels; a kennel for chickens would
be added to the list of permitted accessory structures; and clarify that only one chicken enclosure
is allowed.
If the animal control approach were recommended, he suggested it be renamed to `domestic
animals'; currently in the code it is just dogs and cats. Then add a new section on chickens
page 11
stating that up to four female chickens are allowed as a domestic animal. He then added that only
female chickens are allowed in the sample ordinances he provided as male roosters tend to crow
and therefore create problems in residential neighborhoods. He further explained that the animal
control approach would also state that a chicken coop or enclosure would need to meet the
standards for an accessory structure in the zoning code, and enforcement would be by the same
animal warden who enforces regulations on dogs and cats.
Planner Carlson also included in his memo a list of communities that allow chickens and the
basic provisions that are in their zoning codes.
Planner Carlson and staff did not may any specific recommendations on this issue but did list a
number of options for the Commission to consider:
1) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the zoning code
approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or revisions.
2) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the animal control
approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or revisions.
3) Recommend denial of the proposal to allow domestic chickens in the City.
4) Recommend another course of action to city staff or the City Council.
Planner Carlson then read an email received from Commissioner Costello in response to this
issue, "I am unable to attend the Planning Commission Meeting. Here are my thoughts on
chickens for whatever it's worth. Not looking for a response because it would be considered a
quorum if a bunch of PC members responded, just thoughts."
"Complaint code enforcement is difficult no matter if zoning or animal control. There is usually
a verbal or written notice; then if not corrected within a certain number of days another letter;
then another wait to allow correction; then another or a ticket. This is just something to keep in
mind as there is not a quick remedy process."
"If a zoning ordinance is considered, I'd want to see a limit on chickens, no roosters, coop size
and height limit, not within setbacks, and removal of fecal waste that is not compostable."
"Couple of questions: how long have the cities referenced in the report have their ordinances in
place. Curious if they have made any amendments since adopting or if it is working. Second, for
those that don't require a license or permit, are they receiving complaints difficulty in
enforcing."
At this point, Planner Carlson noted that staff researched the codes and excerpted the policies in
the memo. He himself has not followed up to ask any of Commissioner Costello's questions;
when was it adopted, have they had complaints, is it working, etc.
Chair Field reiterated that the Commission's work this evening is to look at options and forward
the public hearing results and this report to City Council. The Commission will not be drafting
any ordinances at this time. Council needs to make the policy decision; do they want the
Commission to actually go forward.
page 12
Commissioner Hennes noted that the Commission dealt with this issue several years ago. Chair
Field noted that it was no more than 1.5 years ago. Commissioner Hennes continued by stating
that he believed the Commission recommended against it. Discussion occurred over whether or
not the actual discussion was for pigeons or chickens. When the discussion occurred on chickens
the Commission was tied on its recommendation.
At that time, the Council denied the request. However, there is a new Council being seated in
January 2017.
Commissioner Roston noted that he has heard two different things from people he has spoken
with regarding this issue; 1) hens will not lay eggs unless there are roosters around or nearby and
2) hens will lay eggs without a rooster nearby. He then asked which was correct.
Commissioner Petschel asked if the chickens lay eggs for four to five years but they live for ten;
and it appears that most of the other cities ordinances prohibit slaughter; what do the chickens do
for the remaining five to six years. Planner Carlson replied that he was unaware of what the
actual practice is but he imagined that they could be taken elsewhere for slaughter or simply keep
them as pets. No ordinance actually requires them to lay eggs.
Commissioner Petschel asked for clarification or confirmation that this would only refer to the
keeping of chickens, not other types of domestic fowls (i.e. turkeys, ducks, geese). Planner
Carlson replied that he has not seen those other types of domestic fowls in other ordinances.
Chair Field noted that, as he was reading the memo, that the City could do both an animal
enforcement and zoning solution. Planner Carlson confirmed this could be done as long as they
were coordinated.
Commissioner Hennes asked why some cities require a permit or license and others do not.
Planner Carlson replied that he did not have an answer to that question. A permit would allow
the City to keep track and have some kind of record and at least be aware of the regulations.
Without a permit, it is simply on the books and people are expected to know and enforcement
actions would be on a complaint basis.
Chair Field asked if the municipalities that required a permit otherwise had animal control
officers. Planner Carlson was unable to answer that question.
Commissioner Noonan asked if the City currently requires permits or licenses for other domestic
animals. Planner Carlson replied that only dogs are required to have licenses.
Commissioner Noonan asked Planner Carlson to walk them through requirements for a coop and
asked how it would fit in, or how large would those coops be in light of the accessory structure
requirements. Planner Carlson explained that on a lot that is less than 4 acres the size limit is 144
square feet; however, on a larger lot the accessory structure could be as much as 1,000 square
feet. When talking about a typical residential lot in the City of Mendota Heights, the size would
be limited to 144 square feet.
page 13
Commissioner Magnuson asked, referencing the photos included in the memo, if the coop was
the actual building and included the fencing around it or if it was only the building itself and the
fencing was extra. Planner Carlson replied that to be a structure, it would need to be enclosed.
Also referencing the photos, Commissioner Petschel noted that one of the coops appears to be an
enclosed fenced area with a transparent roof. He then asked if that counted as a structure. Planner
Carlson replied in the affirmative. An enclosed structure within a fenced area - only the enclosed
building would be considered an accessory structure.
Councilmember Roston, referencing the list of cities that have adopted ordinances, asked if there
were other cities that had considered and rejected these ordinances. Planner Carlson replied that
he did not look into that area.
Chair Field opened the public hearing.
Mr. Patrick Watson, 1327 Delaware Avenue, had spoken before the Council, among others about
allowing chickens within the City and did not wish to repeat himself. The Planning Commission
and the Council had considered this a few times in the past, most recently in response to a
violation where some people were found to have chickens illegally. He and his friends are trying
to do this the legal way; most people he has spoken with are ignorant of the fact that it is illegal
and others have questions that require answers.
He pointed out that most of the cities that have permits are the ones that were the first adopters to
either rollback an ordinance that previously existed or allowed more permissible ordinances.
What is happening now in most cities that have adopted it recently (like Richfield, Edina, and St.
Paul) is they are rescinding their permit requirements because they have discovered that it is not
necessary and they are handling it all under either zoning or animal control.
Commissioner Magnuson noted that in other municipalities that have permitted chickens, they
range anywhere from two chickens to six chickens. She then asked Mr. Watson if he was aware
of some kind of `magic' number. Mr. Watson replied that a chicken in its prime generally lays
one egg a day. It is just a matter of how many people want eggs. Typically two or three is the
magic number for a backyard flock for a family that does not do much with eggs. He and his
neighbors put in a request for six in their request because they were aware that are two
elementary schools in their district and a high school, where they do occasionally raise chickens.
They have had up to six in each location. They had also put in an age requirement in their
request; up to six over 4 months old. Then they would be allowed to hatch a flock, adopt out the
spares, and keep six.
Chair Field asked for confirmation that the testimony given was before the City Council, not
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Watson confirmed.
Commissioner Magnuson asked if chicken waste was compostable what was done with it. Mr.
Watson replied that chicken waste is 100% compostable; he referred to the University of
Minnesota Extension Service and a few other places that give very good guidance on composting
backyard chicken waste. Dodge Nature Center is also very happy to show anyone how backyard
page 14
composting works for a reasonable amount of chicken waste (a small ash can full a week). The
odor is not objectionable if they compost regularly. If a family does not compost, it can be
disposed of just like kitty litter in the garbage.
Addressing an earlier question about what do to with chickens that have stopped laying, Mr.
Watson stated that there are three choices; 1) if on a farm, the chicken goes into the pot but if
slaughtering is not allowed in the area then it can be taken somewhere else for slaughtering, 2)
some people raise them to the end of their natural lives (10 — 12 years), or 3) euthanasia, similar
to dogs and cats.
Commissioner Petschel noted that in other municipalities it appears that there are no prohibitions
on slaughtering the animals. He then asked if there were specific rules for slaughtering them. Mr.
Watson replied that this is a big pink elephant in the room. In a civilized society they would
either take them to the vet for euthanasia or keep elderly chickens running around in the
backyard.
Mr. Watson also noted that the coop itself would the weatherized structure that would keep the
animal out of the weather, the wind, the rain, and the snow. The 'run' is what gives them the
opportunity to have sunshine, grass, insects, etc. — the chicken wire enclosure. Most runs are
protected overhead to keep predatory birds from diving in and raccoons from climbing in. So,
most likely, that would be considered a part of the accessory structure permitted limit.
Mr. Alex Theobald, 1045 Delaware Avenue, stated that many cities around Mendota Heights
already have the option to raise chickens. He continued by stating that when moving to Mendota
Heights it surprised him that the city does not allow chickens; given the fact that this area was all
farm fields. He also believes that raising backyard chickens could serve as a way to create a
better relationship among neighbors. He understands the concerns about noise, smells, and etc.;
however, there should also be thought given to what could be created that would be good. As
Planner Carlson pointed out, he enjoys getting eggs from his neighbor. This could provide an
opportunity for neighbors to get to know one another better; provide opportunity for children in
the neighborhood to obtain experience in having responsibility (i.e. watching the chickens while
the neighbor is on vacation).
He continued by explaining that he was raised on a farm in Iowa and could answer some of the
questions or address concerns anyone could have. He also confirmed that hens lay eggs without a
rooster present. They are also considered to be pets, just like any other domestic dog or cat.
Commissioner Petschel asked, in Mr. Theobald's experience, if the run and the coop are
considered in the size of an accessory structure. Mr. Theobald replied that he was unsure what
was being got at; however, chickens are social animals. As far as the size goes, a person would
want to ensure that there is sufficient space available otherwise they will get bored and start
picking on each other.
Commissioner Magnuson asked if a person were limited to 144 square feet would it be of
sufficient size. The response was in the affirmative for the number of chickens being considered
(for the coop and the run).
page 15
Planner Carlson stated that the enclosures he is familiar with in his neighborhood where they
have four or six chickens; the actual enclosed area where they are huddled in the cold weather is
fairly small (4x4 ft. or 4x6 ft.) and then there is a larger area that is fenced on all sides (and
covered) so the whole area would be the structure from a zoning definition.
Commissioner Petschel asked when the two residents look at the options that the Commission is
considering — the zoning approach or the domestic animal approach — does it make any
difference. Mr. Theobald replied that maybe Mr. Watson could answer that question. Mr. Watson
replied that the domestic animal approach was not even in the scope of what he and his
neighbors were considering but he agrees that it would be simpler and gives them everything
they are looking for.
Mr. Theobald also commented that if the City has a permit requirement they would need to have
someone to address the permits in the office. In his job as CPA, he knows that any compliance
activity is an additional burden and oftentimes governments place the requirements on citizens
and themselves. In the end it becomes less efficient and more of a burden than a benefit.
Chair Field commented that if there were problems with compliance that needs to be enforced
without an animal control officer, the city is going to underwrite an undue burden to have to
enforce the regulations, which may explain why the permitting process has been used initially
while cities feel their way into permitting domestic chickens.
Mr. Watson stated that if one were to look back at the cities that have this and they will tell you
that there have not been issues — no one is seeing chicken farms, mass slaughtering, vermin,
noise problems — even rooster or cock fighting are not allowable activities.
Planner Carlson noted that in his years of land use planning and zoning he has come to a
question that could frame many issues — letting people do anything they want to with their
property, unless it causes a problem. The city does not regulate many, many things that they do
with their property. Whenever there are regulations under contemplation he often asks 'what is
the problem we are trying to solve'. Imagine there were chickens in every other backyard in
Mendota Heights — what would be the problems anticipated, what would be the problems to be
solved, and are there regulations needed to solve those problems; or cannot they be easily solved
and that is a use that poses so many problems that they should not be allowed or should
prohibition of chickens in the City be continued.
Commissioner Noonan stated that it was not so much a problem to be solved but what the desire
and expectations are of the community. He took exception to the comment that as a landowner
he should be able to do whatever he wants with his property provided it does not cause a
problem. That is not the nature of what zoning is all about. Zoning is there to provide an
appropriate exercise of the police power to control health, safety, and welfare standards. By the
same token the Commission weighing in on whether or not the city is going to permit or not
permit — or recommend chickens in backyards is very much is a reflection of the zoning and the
police power. This is an appropriate discussion to have, whether the Commission believes this
meets the expectations of the community. He stated that he felt disadvantaged as there were two
page 16
individuals advocating a particular position, yet the Commission does not have the broader
community weighing in. Rather than believing that the broader community does not care, he
surmised that the broader community does not know.
Chair Field replied that the Commission was not asked to have a public hearing to say yea or
nay; it was asked to explore possible alternatives to chicken in Mendota Heights so that the City
Council could then make a policy decision, answering the question asked about the community.
Commissioner Noonan respectfully disagreed, as there was a public hearing, the Commission
heard testimony from two individuals, but did not hear anything from the other side of the issue.
With the Commission asked to make a decision with only hearing one side of the issue makes
him uncomfortable. Chair Field reiterated that the Commission is not being asked to make a
recommendation — they were asked to hear about this and refer up to the Council various aspects
that could be used for an ordinance for them to make a determination.
Commissioner Noonan noted that in the staff report there are four options:
1) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the zoning code
approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or revisions.
2) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the animal control
approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or revisions.
3) Recommend denial of the proposal to allow domestic chickens in the City.
4) Recommend another course of action to city staff or the City Council.
He said that it is a recommendation based upon the testimony and the discussion being had now.
Commissioner Noonan explained that he was not assuming that the Commission was going to
write an ordinance tonight.
COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL,
TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
ABSENT: 1
Noting the earlier discussion, Commissioner Roston asked if the Commission was to make a
recommendation yes, we think it's a good policy to come up with some ordinance that would
allow chickens; or no, we think it's not a good policy. Chair Field replied that what he saw at the
City Council meeting was that they did not know what to do; they wanted the Commission to
look at different ways to dealing with the subject matter. The Commission was to be proposed
with different communities ways of handling it, the Commission might suggest that it should be
done by means of permitting, might suggest it should be done by means of zoning, or might want
to do it both — but it is not the Commission's job to draft an ordinance. The City Council needs to
direct the Commission as to what they want it to do.
Planner Carlson stated that he believes the Council's direction was not very explicit. The four
options before the Commission were entirely his; it was an attempt to list ways the Commission
page 17
could handle this issue but they may come up with something else. Chair Field replied that it is
very hard for the Commission given the fact that the Council did not say 'come back to us with
an ordinance' to deal with this subject matter. He took this evening as an opportunity to hear
from the folks that came this evening, to see what different communities are using as an option,
and to forward that information up to the Council and then have them tell the Commission what
they would like — whether that is an ordinance or not.
Commissioner Noonan stated that it sounds like the Council wants the Commission to make a
determination on whether or not this would be a good public policy — to permit chickens. If the
Commission feels that it would be good public policy then they could offer an opinion on the
options of zoning or animal control or something else — or get that decision option back on the
rebound. The Commission would make a broad-based policy recommendation to Council,
Council decides whether or not they agree with the recommendation, and then they could send it
back to the Commission for further work.
Chair Field stated that was sort of the work the Commission was trying to not get into the
ordinance and redrawing the ordinance. Commissioner Hennes stated that he believes there is
some value in sharing with the Council how the Commission feels; it all boils down to the issue
of whether or not to allow chickens. He does not have a problem with it; if someone wants to
have chickens in their backyard it would not bother him.
Commissioner Roston stated that he is completely opposed to this. Someone comes before the
Commission and wants pigeons and they deal with that; someone wants bees and they deal with
that; someone wants whatever and they deal with that. He understands that chickens is the animal
du Jour and everyone is hot about chickens right now, but next year it could be something else.
His belief is that Mendota Heights is a suburb not farmland. If people want to have chickens — he
goes to Greater Minnesota all of the time and there are many rural areas to raise chickens. He
expressed his dislike of the look of the coops when he drives by them as they are ugly and make
the backyard look bad. He also does not like the concept of starting to add additional domestic
animals. He cannot rationalize how the Commission could say yes to chickens but no to pigeons,
or no to bees, or no to something else. Everyone that he has personally reached out to has the
same response. The City does not need to have the same ordinance as everyone else just because
they are in close proximity and allow it.
Commissioner Magnuson expressed her confusion about what should be done now — should
someone make a motion. Chair Field replied that this is what everyone is trying to determine
based on the ambiguous charge from the City Council. She continued by stating that she would
be happy to work on an ordinance and also happy to offer her view on chickens — she not have a
particular problem with chickens — although she believes the proposed ordinance provided would
need to be augmented in some significant ways. But in general, she would be all right with two
or three chickens but was unsure about allowing six.
Commissioner Petschel noted that he is leaning towards allowing chickens but a good point was
brought up — as there are arbitrary alliances — why not pigeons, why not reindeer — can the
Commission come up with a good argument for why they would differentiate between chickens
and pigeons.
page 18
Chair Field clarified that if someone owned a piece of property in Mendota Heights that was
zoned agricultural they could have all of these types of animals. The issue under discussion
would be within the residential zoning districts. He also noted that, in many cases, it is not until
it comes to the attention of a neighbor that it becomes an issue; which was the case with a pigeon
application before.
Commissioner Noonan voiced his support of Commissioner Roston's position. In thinking about
his own neighborhood and what would his reaction be to a neighbor's having a chicken coop and
run in their backyard. He has also tried to put his feet in their shoes as well — he does not believe
it meets the expectations of what this community is all about. It is pushing the envelope of what
a domestic animal is and moving into an area with a slippery slope — it could be chickens today
and something else altogether tomorrow. The use is inappropriate and it raises an issue that has
one perspective being shared today without benefit of the other perspective.
COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE PROPOSAL TO ALLOW DOMESTIC CHICKENS IN
THE CITY
AYES: 2 (Roston, Noonan)
NAYS: 4 (Hennes, Magnuson, Petschel, Field)
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON,
TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY APPROVE AN ORDINANCE
USING THE ANIMAL CONTROL APPROACH TO ALLOWING DOMESTIC CHICKENS,
WITH OR WITHOUT CONDITIONS OR REVISIONS
Commissioner Hennes then asked for a friendly amendment so that the Commission would not
be tied to either the zoning approach or the animal control approach.
After discussion, the motion was revised to: COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED,
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
ALLOWING DOMESTIC CHICKENS WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
OF THE CITY, WITH THE STANTEC REPORT DETAILING VARIOUS ZONING
OPTIONS IN ADJACENT COMMUNITIES, AND WITH NO RECOMMENDATION AS TO
THE TYPE OF ORDINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AYES: 4 (Hennes, Magnuson, Petschel, Field)
NAYS: 2 (Roston, Noonan)
ABSENT: 1
Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its January 2, 2017
meeting.
page 19
Verbal Review
City Administrator Mark McNeill informed the Commission that staff has completed interviews
for the Community Development Director and a tentative offer had been made to a candidate.
Staff is now in the process of doing some background investigation and negotiations. It is hoped
that this would be successful and it would be taken to the City Council on January 17, 2017 with
that individual being able to start their duties in mid-February 2017. Planner Carlson noted that
he sat in on those interviews and he has known this individual; he was their first choice. Chair
Field also noted that he interviewed this person and believes the City would be very pleased with
them.
Consulting Planner Phil Carlson, AICP gave the following verbal review:
PLANNING CASE #2016-40
Ideal Energies, LLC, 1450 Mendota Heights Road
Conditional User Permit
• Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission
PLANNING CASE #2016-41
Jerry Trooien, 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway
Critical Area Permit and Conditional Use Permit
• Tabled by the City Council
o In light of work being done outside of obtaining a permit the applicant was asked to
work with staff to address those issues; the applicant was asked to apply for an after -
the -fact permit to address those issues; the applicant engaged a landscape architect to
develop plans, however due to the onset of winter those detailed plans did not come
together; the architect requested permission to do stop -gap measures to prevent
erosion; plans are expected sometime this winter or early spring; the 120 -day review
deadline comes up in the middle of February, a decision will need to be made to
either deny the permit on the table or to ask the applicant to waive that deadline
PLANNING CASE #2016-42
Timothy McGough, 1787 Lexington Avenue
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
• Withdrawn at the request of the applicant
Adjournment
COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL,
TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:05 P.M.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
ABSENT: 1
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
page 20
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
January 3, 2017
Mayor and City Council, City Administrator
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
Designation of Official Newspaper
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to designate an Official Newspaper for the City for 2017.
BACKGROUND
Minnesota Statutes §412.831 requires that the City Council annually designate the official
newspaper for the year for publication of legal notices. Ordinances, financial reports, public
notices, and other information as required by law, as well as matters the Council deems
necessary, shall be published in the City's designated official newspaper.
The South-West Review is currently designated as the City's official newspaper. The publisher,
Lillie Suburban News has expressed an interest in continuing that designation for the city.
Attached is a quote from Lillie Suburban which has been serving the city of Mendota Heights for
the past 38 years. To date, we have received excellent service in addition to accurate and timely
processing of all legal and official publications. The South-West Review is also the official
newspaper for the cities of West St. Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota, and Lilydale.
The legal publication rates proposed for 2017 are $8.50 per column inch for a one-time
publication. $ 8.15 per column inch is proposed for each additional publication of the same
article or notification. The 2016 rates were $8.10 and $7.75 respectively. They post all legal
notices on their website at no additional charge.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council designate the South-West Review as the city's official
newspaper for 2017. This action requires a majority vote of the city council.
r 00
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Smith:
Gan Newep per s, Inc.
page 21�
2515 E. Seventh Avenue
North St. Paul, MN 55109
(651) 777-8800
December 20, 2016
Thank you for the opportunity to bid on public notice publication services for the City of
Mendota Heights. Lillie Suburban Newspapers has been serving the needs of the Mendota Heights
area for 38 years, and is pleased to provide ongoing coverage of city government and school issues
and community events.
Lillie Suburban Newspapers is the oldest weekly newspaper company in the St. Paul area. It was
founded in 1938 by the late T. R. Lillie. His grandsons, Jeffery Enright and Ted H. Lillie, are
continuing the family tradition of publishing award-winning community newspapers in the St. Paul
suburbs.
It is our sincere desire to provide the best possible local news coverage in the Mendota Heights
area. Our experienced news staff provides readers with a well-balanced, lively and informative
product each week. We realize that Mendota Heights area residents look to the South-West Review as
one of their primary sources of information about city activities and meetings, and we will continue to
publish the city's press releases and photos.
The South-West Review has the official designation of the neighboring communities of West St.
Paul, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota and Lilydale.
5 P.M. Wednesday is the deadline each week for submitting public notices to our office. Public
notices should be directed to Kitty Sundberg, Lillie Suburban Newspapers, 2515 E. Seventh Ave.,
North St. Paul, MN 55109. Our fax number is 651/777-8288. Notices may also be sent via e-mail to:
legal @lillienews.com
Legal publication rates for minutes, advertisements for bids and other notices are as follows:
$8.50 per column inch for a one-time publication
$8.15 per column inch for each additional publication
Thank you for considering the South-West Review as the official legal newspaper for the City of
Mendota Heights for 2017. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to call us.
Sincerely,
Jeffery Enright
Publisher
LILLIE
NEWS
Ramsey County Review • Maplewood Review • Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review • Review Perspectives
New Brighton Bulletin • Shoreview Bulletin • St.Anthony Bulletin • South-West Review
Roseville -Little Canada Review • Woodbury -South Maplewood Review • East Side Review
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BACKGROUND
page 22
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
January 3, 2017
Mayor and City Council, City Administrator
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
Resolution 2017-01 Approving Fee Schedule
City staff has reviewed the current fee schedule which was last revised and approved on May 17,
2016.
There are no significant changes proposed to the fee schedule for this year.
There is one addition to the fee schedule. On December 6, 2016, the City Council rescinded
Resolution 2006-69 which approved a policy covering liquor license violation penalties. At that
time, staff proposed adding those liquor license violation penalties to the fee schedule. Those
penalties are now proposed to be added to page 3 of the fee schedule. There are no changes to
the penalty amounts proposed.
Other proposed changes to fees include the following:
*In the Building Permit fees section, staff has proposed a change to the fee for demolition
permits, which had been 1% of value/$75 minimum, and instead is proposed to follow the fees in
Attachment A. This change will make the demolition permit charge consistent with other
building permit fees being charged.
*In the Parks and Recreation section, the fee for picnic shelter rental is proposed to be
increased. For residents, the fee is proposed to increase from $0 to $25. For non-residents, the
fee is proposed to increase from $25 to $50.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 2017-01 Revising the Schedule of
Fees for Services, to be effective January 4, 2017. This action requires a majority vote of the
city council.
page 23
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017 - 01
RESOLUTION REVISING SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has established by City Code that all
fee requirements established be brought forth by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights last revised the fee schedule by the
adoption of Resolution 2016-42 Revising Schedule of Fees for Services; and
WHEREAS, the cost of providing services may escalate; and
WHEREAS, new services require a fee to be set; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that fees be revised to cover any escalating costs of
providing services and to cover new services.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City
Council that the attached revised City of Mendota Heights fee schedule is hereby adopted
and effective immediately upon passage.
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 24
.it,
2017
City of
Mendota Heights
Fee Schedule
Adopted by City Council on January 3, 2017
Resolution 2017-01
page 25
2017 2016
ADMINISTRATION FEE SCHEDULE
Agenda Mailing Annual subscription
Assessment Search
Assessment Split
Certification of Delinquent Sewer Accounts
City Hall Meeting Room
City Ordinance Book
Comprehensive Plan
Critical Area Ordinance
Election Filing Fee
Friday News Mailing
Legal Description
Mailing Costs
Minutes
Minutes Mailing
Notary Public
Returned Checks
Subdivision Ordinance
TIF / Abatement Application Fee
Wetlands Ordinance
Zoning Ordinance
Per MN Statutes 205.13 (3)
Annual subscription
Written
Resident or non-resident
Annual subscription
$25/year
$15/search
$25 plus staff time
$50/per certification
$100 damage deposit
$75/book
—1EM $50/Complete; $30/One Volume
$4/each
MN. I 11.11
$75/year
Residents, businesses, license applicants only
$5/each
Actual or $1/minimum
$ .25/page plus postage
$50/year
No charge
$30 /check
$7.50/each
$1,200
$2/each
$20/each
DATA REQUESTS
NOTE: Data released by the City adheres to MN Data Practices Act, MN Statutes Chap 13
Photo Copies
1 to 100 pages
■
$ .25/single sided page
$ .25/ single sided page plus staff
time
$.00 to review info at city hall;
$.25 per single sided copy; staff
time charged when over 100
copies
Photo Copies
Request for Public Data
over 100 pages
MN Statutes, Chapter 13
DVD s/uwith
Photos/Audd io/Video
$10
2017
page 26
2016
ADMINISTRATION FEE SCHEDULE
Intoxicating Liquor Off Sale
Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Tier 1
Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Tier 2
Intoxicating Liquor Licenses (fees set in City Code 3-1-9)
limited by State Statutes 340A.408 Subd. 3. a.(3)
Tier 1 license
Tier 2 license
Intoxicating Liquor On -Sale Hotel
Club Liquor On -Sale
Sunday Liquor
Wine On -Sale
Wine On -Sale Institutional
Malt Liquor Off Sale (3.2%)
Malt Liquor On Sale (3.2%)
Temporary On Sale Intoxicating Liquor,
Malt Liquor, Wine
Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, 3.2 Malt Liq
Application Investigation
Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, 3.2 Malt Liq
Application Investigation
Limited Service Hotel
limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.b.
limited by SS 340A.504
limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.c.
limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.c.
$150.00
$10,000
$7,500
$3,000
$350 (for 201-500 club
members)
$200
$2,000
$250
Malt Liquor Licenses (fees set in City Code 3-1-9)
Temporary On Sale Special Event Licenses (fee set in City Code 3-1-9)
Issued only to clubs, non -profits, religious
organizations
Application Investigation Fees
Renewal or Change
New Applicant
$50
$250
$50 / one to three day license
$100/per establishment
$1,500/per licensee, $1,000
refunded if no out of state
investigation needed (for out of
state investigation, actual cost
charged, up to $10,000)
(SS340A.412 (subd. 2))
First Violation
Second Violation
•
Liquor License Violation
within a 2 year rolling time period
within a 2 year rolling time period
$1,000 fine + 3 day
suspension of license
$1,500 fine + 6 day
suspension of license
$1,000 fine + 3 day suspension
of license
$1,500 fine + 6 day suspension
of license
Third Violation
Fourth Violation
within a 2 year rolling time period
within a 2 year rolling time period
$2,000 fine + 9 day
suspension of license
Revocation: minimum of 1
year from revocation date
$2,000 fine + 9 day suspension
of license
Revocation• minimum of 1 year
from revocation date
page 27
2017 2016
ADMINISTRATION FEE SCHEDULE
License and Permit Fees
Dog License Not neutered or Not spayed
Dog License Neutered or Spayed
Massage Therapist License New licensee or renewal
Massage Therapist License Investigation New licensee or renewal
Massage Therapy Enterprise License New licensee or renewal
Massage Therapy Enterprise License New licensee or renewal
Investigation
Rental License Fee
Rubbish Haulcr License City Code 4-2-3. Fee not prorated
Tobacco License City Code 3-2-4. Fee not prorated.
Tobacco Investigation Fee New or Renewal
$15/annual
$10/annual
$50
$50
$100
$100
$75/annual
$75/annual plus $10 per truck tag
$200/ annual
$100 per establishment
page 28
2017 2016
BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
Building Alterations
Building Moving Permit
Building Permit Fee
Contractor License
Demolition Permit
Residential/Commercial
Residential/Commercial
Annual
Mechanical Alteration or Residential or Commercial
Replacement (including gas piping and gas
fire place installation)
Plan Review Fee Residential or Commercial
Plumbing Permit Fee Residential or Commercial
Per Attachment A
Per Attachment A
$75
Per Attachment A
$50/year
1% of value/$ 75 minimum
■
1% of value/$ 75 minimum
Per Attachment A
Exceptions ($50 fee): Decks,
Basement Finishes, Kitchen
Remodel, Bathroom Remodel,
and similar nroiects.
1% of value/$ 75 minimum
Public Utility or Improved Public ROW Residential/Commercial parcels not assessed at Amount assessed at time of
Connection time of past City improvement when surrounding improvement plus interest at rate
lots were assessed (includes newly created lots) offered to other assessments at
time of improvement
Roof Permit Commercial 1% of value/$100
minimum/$1,000 maximum
Roofing and Siding Permit Residential 1% of value/$100 minimum
A
Sewer Permit Residential/Commercial $75
Storm Sewer Utility Commercial/Industrial $ 121.80 /acre
Charge
Storm Sewer Utility Residential $7.25
Charge
Water Residential/Commercial $10
Window / Door Replacement Residential 1% of value/$75 minimum
page 29
2017 2016
ENGINEERING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FEE SCHEDULE
Driveway Permit
Driveway Permit
Engineering and Drafting
Services
Feasibility Report
Field Inspection and
Staking
Grading Permit
Litigation
Replacement
New or Expanded
Credit shall be given for
information which can be used in plan and
specification preparation
Miscellaneous Charges
Plans and Specifications
Plans and Specifications
Preliminary Studies
1
Professional Services on
Planning Cases
Public Right of Way
Permit
1
Public Right of Way
Permit
Project Construction under $100,000
Project Construction over $100,000
Commercial
Residential
Right -Of -Way Usage license —.1=r
Vacation - ROW or Easement
1
$50
$100
Actual costs plus staff time
Actual costs plus staff time
Actual costs plus staff time
$100/flat fee
Actual costs plus staff time
Actual costs plus staff time
Actual costs plus staff time
7% of final contract amount
Actual costs plus staff time
1st hour per case Included/
thereafter actual costs plus staff
time
$200 / first 1000 feet
$25 / each additional 100 feet
$50 /flat fee
$350
$250
Note: Staff time is computed on the basis of 250% of the employee's hourly rate for the above services
page 30
2017 2016
ENGINEERING - MAPS, PLANS AND DRAWINGS FEE SCHEDULE
CD of Data or Maps $5 plus map fee
1
Maps/Plans/Drawings: Up to 11 x 17
Comprehensive Plan Black and White
Critical Area
GIS
Land Use
Plats
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer Street Asbuilts Wetlands
Zoning
Maps/Plans/Drawings: Up to 11 x 17
Comprehensive Plan Color
Critical Area
GIS
Land Use
Plats
Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Street Asbuilts
Wetlands Zoning
Maps/Plans/Drawings:
Comprehensive Plan
Critical Area
GIS
Land Use
Plats
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer
Street Asbuilts Wetlands Zoning
Maps/Plans/Drawings:
Comprehensive Plan
Critical Area
GIS
Land Use
Plats
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer Street Asbuilts Wetlands
Zoning
Greater than 11 x 17
Black and White
Greater than 11 x 17
Color
$3
$10
$6
$20
page 31
2017 2016
PARKS AND RECREATION FEE SCHEDULE
i
Concessions Building Reservation
Field Reservation Baseball
Field Reservation Softball
Ficld Reservation Soccer
Field Preparation 3 or more fields only
Field Chalk
Field Drying Agent
Ice Rink Reservation
Ice Rink Warming House Key Damage Deposit
Par 3 Greens Fees Juniors/Seniors-Weekday
Par 3 Greens Fees Juniors/Seniors-Weekend
Par 3 Greens Fees Weekday
Par 3 Greens Fees Weekend
Par 3 10 -Round Pass
Par 3 Pull Cart Rental
Par 3 Power Cart Rental
1
$25/event
$35/day
$35/day
$50 /day
Actual Cost or $100 minimum
$10/bag
$15 / bag
$35 / hour
.1-
$100
MI
$10/round
$12/round
$11/round
$13 / round
$90
$3/ round
$10 / round
Picnic Area/Shelter Resident - Private $25/usage fee per day + $25 / application fee
$25/application fee
1
Picnic Area/Shelter Non -Resident - Private $50/usage fee per day + $25/usage fee per day +
$25/application fee $25/application fee
Picnic Area/Shelter Resident - Business $50/useage fee per day +
$25/application fee
Picnic Area/Shelter Non -Resident - Business li $100/usage fee per day +
$25/app fee
Picnic Area Shelter Damage Deposit
Waived for nonprofit youth service organizations and $100 / event
neighborhood groups reserving neighborhood park
NOTE: Mendota Heights schools, city events, and non-profit civic organizations are fee exempt but must pay damage deposit.
Picnic Area Cancellation
Picnic Area Cancellation
Picnic Area Cancellation
Picnic Table Additional
7 days advance notice
Less than 7 days notice
Due to inclement weather
On-site
1
100% refund
Not refundable
m
ME
Not refundable but may be
rescheduled at no add'1 charge
$15 / each per day
page 32
2017 2016
PARKS AND RECREATION FEE SCHEDULE
Tournament Fee - Softball or Soccer Two-day tournament $500/weekend
Tournament Fee Soccer One -day tournament $250/day
Tournament Additional Day(s) $45/per ficld
Tournament Fee Softball or Soccer MHAA In -House Only, City Recreation 1 No Charge
Tournament Additional MHAA In -House Only, City Recreation No Charge
Day(s)
Tournament $300
Damage Deposit Fee
Trash Pick-up Following Large Event, taken from damage $100/event
deposit
Tournament One month notice 100 % refundable
Cancellation Fee
Tournament 15 to 30 advance notice 50 % refundable
Cancellation Fee
Tournament 1 to 14 advance notice Not refundable
Cancellation Fee
page 33
2017 2016
PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE
J
Accessory Structure Permit
For structures not requiring a building permit $25
After -the -Fact Permit For actions undertaken without appropriate zoning
permits
Appeal to Board of Zoning Appeals
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Concept Plan Review for PUD/Plat
Conditional Use Permit / Interim Use Residential
Permit
Conditional Use Permit / Interim Use
Permit
Critical Area Permit
CUP for PUD
Fence Permit
Lot Split / Lot Line Adjustment
Mining Permit
Commercra�ndustrial
Park Dedication Fee Single and Multi -Family Residential
Park Dedication Fee New Commercial / Industrial Lot
Rezoning
Preliminary/Final Plat
Escrow Table
Double fee, or $250, whichever
is greater
$250 + $500 escrow
$750 + $500 escrow
$250 + $500 escrow
$350 + $500 escrow
$500 + $5
$100 + $500 escrow
$500 + $500 escrow
$25
$500 + $500 escrow
1
$350 +-$500 escrow
$ 4,000/ dwelling unit
10% of assessed value of
unimproved land as determined
by the County Assessor
$500 + $500 escrow
$750 + escrow amount
Residential districts 0 to 10 units
Res Districts, MR -PUD, HR -PUD districts -over 10
$100/unit, $250 minimum
$50/unit
Commerical/Industrial Districts, MU -PUD
$1,500
Expenses billed to the city will be charged against the escrow accounts. Any remaining escrow will be returned to applicant.
Applicants will be billed for any city incurred expenses exceeding the escrow amount.
Sign Permit Triple fee charged if sign is erected w/o permit Per Attachment A
Per Code 12-1D-15 B. 2
Temporary Sign Permit $25
Variance Residential $300 + $500 escrow
Variance Commercial or Industrial
Wetlands Permit Residential
Wetlands Permit
Zoning Letter ■
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Commercial or Industrial
$500 + $500 escrow
$150 + $500 escrow
$200 + $500 escrow
$250 + $500 escrow
page 34
2017 2016
PUBLIC SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
Fingerprints
Must be a resident or an employee of a business $10.00 per card
located in the Mendota Heights service area
Car Seat Rental Residents Only
$50 Deposit; check held for one
month; upon return, $25 refund.
If seat not returned within one
month, deposit is non-refundable.
Clearance Letter $5
DATA REQUESTS Data released by the City of Mendota Heights adheres to IPAD guidelines and MN Statutes Chapter 13.
Copy of Incident
Report
Per IPAD/MSS 13.82 $.25/page up to 100 pages
Copy of Accident
Report
I
In person, involved party request
Copy of Accident
Report
Request from insurance or attorney
$.25/page up to 100 pages
Self-addressed, stamped envelope
with signed release. If over 4
pgs, contact requestor for
alternate payment.
Per IPAD/MSS 13.82: Must prove involvement in/relationship to accident and either present ID or a signed release
Request for Public Data
Per IPAD/MSS 13.82 $.00 if information is only
reviewed at city hall.
CD with
Photos/Audio/Video
Per IPAD/MSS 13.82 $10
page 35
2017 2016
OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY FEES
Dog Impound Fee
Vehicle Impound
Vehicle Storage MHPD Indoor storage
Basic Property Storage Stored at or by MHPD
False Alarm, Police
False Alarm, Fire
Fire Alarm Permit
Removal of Underground Fuel Tanks
Plan Check Fee
Fire Sprinkler
Alteration
Per calendar year
Per calendar year
Commercial
Residential/Commercial
NEW
ay Care Fire Inspection Per MN Statutes 299F.011
$ 67.00 for 1st Day
$ 16.00 each day thereafter
Current Tow Rate + Tax
$35 per day
Small(2ftX4ft): $1/day
Medium(5ftX7ft): $3/day
Large(8ftX10ft): $5/day
Off -Site: Actual costs
First three no charge, 4th -$50;
5th -$75; 6th -$100; ea add'l-add
$25
First two no charge, third and
each additional - $150/ea
Per Attachment A
$50 minimum
Per Attachment A
Per Attachment A
$50
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$1.00 to $500.00
$25.00
$16.25
$501.00 to $600.00
$28.25
$18.36
$601.00 to $700.00
$31.50
$20.48
$701.00 to $800.00
$34.75
$22.59
$801.00 to $900.00
$38.00
$24.70
$901.00 to $1,000.00
$41.25
$26.81
$1,001.00 to $1,100.00
$44.50
$28.93
$1,101.00 to $1,200.00
$47.75
$31.04
$1,201.00 to $1,300.00
$51.00
$33.15
$1,301.00 to $1,400.00
$54.25
$35.26
$1,401.00 to $1,500.00
$57.50
$37.38
$1,501.00 to $1,600.00
$60.75
$39.49
$1,601.00 to $1,700.00
$64.00
$41.60
$1,701.00 to $1,800.00
$67.25
$43.71
$1,801.00 to $1,900.00
$70.50
$45.83
$1,901.00 to $2,000.00
$73.75
$47.94
$2,001.00 to $3,000.00
$88.50
$57.53
$3,001.00 to $4,000.00
$103.25
$67.11
$4,001.00 to $5,000.00
$118.00
$76.70
$5,001.00 to $6,000.00
$132.75
$86.29
$6,001.00 to $7,000.00
$147.50
$95.88
$7,001.00 to $8,000.00
$162.25
$105.46
$8,001.00 to $9,000.00
$177.00
$115.05
$9,001.00 to $10,000.00
$191.75
$124.64
$10,001.00 to $11,000.00
$206.50
$134.23
$11,001.00 to $12,000.00
$221.25
$143.81
$12,001.00 to $13,000.00
$236.00
$153.40
$13,001.00 to $14,000.00
$250.75
$162.99
$14,001.00 to $15,000.00
$265.50
$172.58
$15,001.00 to $16,000.00
$280.25
$182.16
$16,001.00 to $17,000.00
$295.00
$191.75
$17,001.00 to $18,000.00
$309.75
$201.34
$18,001.00 to $19,000.00
$324.50
$210.93
$19,001.00 to $20,000.00
$339.25
$220.51
$20,001.00 to $21,000.00
$354.00
$230.10
$21,001.00 to $22,000.00
$368.75
$239.69
$22,001.00 to $23,000.00
$383.50
$249.28
$23,001.00 to $24,000.00
$398.25
$258.86
$24,001.00 to $25,000.00
$413.00
$268.45
$25,001.00 to $26,000.00
$423.75
$275.44
$26,001.00 to $27,000.00
$434.50
$282.43
$27,001.00 to $28,000.00
$445.25
$289.41
$28,001.00 to $29,000.00
$456.00
$296.40
$29,001.00 to $30,000.00
$466.75
$303.39
$30,001.00 to $31,000.00
$477.50
$310.38
page 36
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$31,001.00 to $32,000.00
$488.25
$317.36
$32,001.00 to $33,000.00
$499.00
$324.35
$33,001.00 to $34,000.00
$509.75
$331.34
$34,001.00 to $35,000.00
$520.50
$338.33
$35,001.00 to $36,000.00
$531.25
$345.31
$36,001.00 to $37,000.00
$542.00
$352.30
$37,001.00 to $38,000.00
$552.75
$359.29
$38,001.00 to $39,000.00
$563.50
$366.28
$39,001.00 to $40,000.00
$574.25
$373.26
$40,001.00 to $41,000.00
$585.00
$380.25
$41,001.00 to $42,000.00
$595.75
$387.24
$42 001.00 to $43,000.00
$606.50
$394.23
$43,001.00 to $44,000.00
$660.25
$429.16
$44,001.00 to $45,000.00
$628.00
$408.20
$45,001.00 to $46,000.00
$638.75
$415.19
$46,001.00 to $47,000.00
$649.50
$422.18
$47,001.00 to $48,000.00
$660.25
$429.16
$48,001.00 to $49,000.00
$671.00
$436.15
$49,001.00 to $50,000.00
$681.75
$443.14
$50,001.00 to $51,000.00
$689.25
$448.01
$51,001.00 to $52,000.00
$696.75
$452.89
$52,001.00 to $53,000.00
$704.25
$457.76
$53,001.00 to $54,000.00
$711.75
$462.64
$54,001.00 to $55,000.00
$719.25
$467.51
$55,001.00 to $56,000.00
726.75
$472.39
$56,001.00 to $57,000.00
$764.25
$496.76
$57,001.00 to $58,000.00
$741.75
$482.14
$58,001.00 to $59,000.00
$749.25
$487.01
$59,001.00 to $60,000.00
$756.75
$491.89
$60,001.00 to $61,000.00
$764.25
$496.76
$61,001.00 to $62,000.00
$771.75
$501.64
$62,001.00 to $63,000.00
$779.25
$506.51
$63,001.00 to $64,000.00
$786.75
$511.39
$64,001.00 to $65,000.00
$794.25
$516.26
$65,001.00 to $66,000.00
$801.75
$521.14
$66,001.00 to $67,000.00
$809.25
$526.01
$67,001.00 to $68,000.00
$816.75
$530.89
$68,001.00 to $69,000.00
$824.25
$535.76
$69,001.00 to $70,000.00
$831.75
$540.64
$70,001.00 to $71,000.00
$839.25
$545.51
$71,001.00 to $72,000.00
$846.75
$550.39
$72,001.00 to $73,000.00
$854.25
$555.26
$73,001.00 to $74,000.00
$861.75
$560.14
$74,001.00 to $75,000.00
$869.25
$565.01
$75,001.00 to $76,000.00
$876.25
$569.56
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$76,001.00 to $77,000.00
$884.25
$574.76
$77,001.00 to $78,000.00
$891.75
$579.64
$78,001.00 to $79,000.00
$899.25
$584.51
$79,001.00 to $80,000.00
$906.75
$589.39
$80,001.00 to $81,000.00
$914.25
$594.26
$81,001.00 to $82,000.00
$921.75
$599.14
$82,001.00 to $83,000.00
$929.25
$604.01
$83,001.00 to $84,000.00
$936.75
$608.89
$84,001.00 to $85,000.00
$944.25
$613.76
$85,001.00 to $86,000.00
$951.75
$618.64
$86,001.00 to $87,000.00
$959.25
$623.51
$87,001.00 to $88,000.00
$966.75
$628.39
$88,001.00 to $89,000.00
$974.25
$633.26
$89,001.00 to $90,000.00
$981.75
$638.14
$90,001.00 to $91,000.00
$989.25
$643.01
$91,001.00 to $92,000.00
$996.75
$647.89
$92,001.00 to $93,000.00
$1004.25
$652.76
$93,001.00 to $94,000.00
$1011.75
$657.64
$94,001.00 to $95,000.00
$1019.25
$662.51
$95,001.00 to $96,000.00
$1026.75
$667.39
$96,001.00 to $97,000.00
$1034.25
$672.26
$97,001.00 to $98,000.00
$1041.75
$677.14
$98,001.00 to $99,000.00
$1049.25
$682.01
$99,001.00 to $100,000.00
$1056.75
$686.89
$100,001.00 to $101,000.00
$1062.75
$690.79
$101,001.00 to $102,000.00
$1068.75
$694.69
$102,001.00 to $103,000.00
$1074.75
$698.59
$103,001.00 to $104,000.00
$1080.75
$702.49
$104,001.00 to $105,000.00
$1086.75
$706.39
$105,001.00 to $106,000.00
$1092.75
$710.29
$106,001.00 to $107,000.00
$1098.75
$714.19
$107,001.00 to $108,000.00
$1104.75
$718.09
$108,001.00 to $109,000.00
$1110.75
$721.99
$109,001.00 to $110,000.00
$1116.75
$725.89
$110,001.00 to $111,000.00
$1122.75
$729.79
$111,001.00 to $112,000.00
$1128.75
$733.69
$112,001.00 to $113,000.00
$1134.75
$737.59
$113,001.00 to $114,000.00
$1140.75
$741.49
$114,001.00 to $115,000.00
$1146.75
$745.39
$115,001.00 to $116,000.00
$1152.75
$749.29
$116,001.00 to $117,000.00
$1158.75
$753.19
$117,001.00 to $118,000.00
$1164.75
$757.09
$118,001.00 to $119,000.00
$1170.75
$760.99
$119,001.00 to $120,000.00
$1176.75
$764.89
$120,001.00 to $121,000.00
$1182.75
$768.79
page 37
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$121,001.00 to $122,000.00
$1,188.75
$772.69
$122,001.00 to $123,000.00
$1,194.75
$776.59
$123,001.00 to $124,000.00
$1,200.75
$780.49
$124,001.00 to $125,000.00
$1,206.75
$784.39
$125,001.00 to $126,000.00
$1,212.75
$788.29
$126,001.00 to $127,000.00
$1,218.75
$792.19
$127,001.00 to $128,000.00
$1,224.75
$796.09
$128,001.00 to $129,000.00
$1,230.75
$799.99
$129,001.00 to $130,000.00
$1,236.75
$803.89
$130,001.00 to $131,000.00
$1,242.75
$807.79
$131,001.00 to $132,000.00
$1,248.75
$811.69
$132,001.00 to $133,000.00
$1,254.75
$815.59
$133,001.00 to $134,000.00
$1,260.75
$819.49
$134,001.00 to $135,000.00
$1,266.75
$823.39
$135,001.00 to $136,000.00
$1,272.75
$827.29
$136,001.00 to $137,000.00
$1,278.75
$831.19
$137,001.00 to $138,000.00
$1,284.75
$835.09
$138,001.00 to $139,000.00
$1,290.75
$838.99
$139,001.00 to $140,000.00
$1,296.75
$842.89
$140,001.00 to $141,000.00
$1,302.75
$846.79
$141,001.00 to $142,000.00
$1,308.75
$850.69
$142,001.00 to $143,000.00
$1,314.75
$854.59
$143,001.00 to $144,000.00
$1,320.75
$858.49
$144,001.00 to $145,000.00
$1,326.75
$862.39
$145,001.00 to $146,000.00
$1,332.75
$866.29
$146,001.00 to $147,000.00
$1,338.75
$870.19
$147,001.00 to $148,000.00
$1,344.75
$874.09
$148,001.00 to $149,000.00
$1,350.75
$877.99
$149,001.00 to $150,000.00
$1,356.75
$881.89
$150,001.00 to $151,000.00
$1,362.75
$885.79
$151,001.00 to $152,000.00
$1,368.75
$889.69
$152,001.00 to $153,000.00
$1,374.75
$893.59
$153,001.00 to $154,000.00
$1,380.75
$897.49
$154,001.00 to $155,000.00
$1,386.75
$901.39
$155,001.00 to $156,000.00
$1,392.75
$905.29
$156,001.00 to $157,000.00
$1,398.75
$909.19
$157,001.00 to $158,000.00
$1,404.75
$913.09
$158,001.00 to $159,000.00
$1,410.75
$916.99
$159,001.00 to $160,000.00
$1,416.75
$920.89
$160,001.00 to $161,000.00
$1,422.75
$924.79
$161,001.00 to $162,000.00
$1,428.75
$928.69
$162,001.00 to $163,000.00
$1,434.75
$932.59
$163,001.00 to $164,000.00
$1,440.75
$936.49
$164,001.00 to $165,000.00
$1,446.75
$940.39
$165,001.00 to $166,000.00
$1,452.75
$944.29
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$166,001.00 to $167,000.00
$1,458.75
$948.19
$167,001.00 to $168,000.00
$1,464.75
$952.09
$168,001.00 to $169,000.00
$1,470.75
$955.99
$169,001.00 to $170,000.00
$1,476.75
$959.89
$170,001.00 to $171,000.00
$1,482.75
$963.79
$171,001.00 to $172,000.00
$1,488.75
$967.69
$172,001.00 to $173,000.00
$1,494.75
$971.59
$173,001.00 to $174,000.00
$1,500.75
$975.49
$174,001.00 to $175,000.00
$1,506.75
$979.39
$175,001.00 to $176,000.00
$1,512.75
$983.29
$176,001.00 to $177,000.00
$1,518.75
$987.19
$177,000.00 to $178,000.00
$1,524.75
$991.09
$178,001.00 to $179,000.00
$1,530.75
$994.99
$179,001.00 to $180,000.00
$1,536.75
$998.89
$180,001.00 to $181,000.00
$1,542.75
$1002.79
$181,001.00 to $182,000.00
$1,548.75
$1006.69
$182,001.00 to $183,000.00
$1,554.75
$1010.59
$183,001.00 to $184,000.00
$1,560.75
$1014.49
$184,001.00 to $185,000.00
$1,566.75
$1018.39
$185,001.00 to $186,000.00
$1,572.75
$1022.29
$186,001.00 to $187,000.00
$1,578.75
$1026.19
$187,001.00 to $188,000.00
$1,584.75
$1030.09
$188,001.00 to $189,000.00
$1,590.75
$1033.99
$189,001.00 to $190,000.00
$1,596.75
$1037.89
$190,001.00 to $191,000.00
$1,602.75
$1041.79
$191,001.00 to $192,000.00
$1,608.75
$1045.69
$192,001.00 to $193,000.00
$1,614.75
$1049.59
$193,001.00 to $194,000.00
$1,620.75
$1053.49
$194,001.00 to $195,000.00
$1,626.75
$1057.39
$195,001.00 to $196,000.00
$1,632.75
$1061.29
$196,001.00 to $197,000.00
$1,638.75
$1065.19
$197,001.00 to $198,000.00
$1,644.75
$1069.09
$198,001.00 to $199,000.00
$1,650.75
$1072.99
$199,001.00 to $200,000.00
$1,656.75
$1076.89
$200,001.00 to $201,000.00
$1,662.75
$1080.79
$201,001.00 to $202,000.00
$1,668.75
$1084.69
$202,001.00 to $203,000.00
$1,674.75
$1088.59
$203,001.00 to $204,000.00
$1,680.75
$1092.49
$204,001.00 to $205,000.00
$1,686.75
$1096.39
$205,001.00 to $206,000.00
$1,692.75
$1100.29
$206,001.00 to $207,000.00
$1,698.75
$1104.19
$207,001.00 to $208,000.00
$1,704.75
$1108.09
$208,001.00 to $209,000.00
$1,710.75
$1111.99
$209,001.00 to $210,000.00
$1,716.75
$1115.89
$210,001.00 to $211,000.00
$1,722.75
$1119.79
page 38
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$211,001.00 to $212,000.00
$1,728.75
$1123.69
$212,001.00 to $213,000.00
$1,734.75
$1127.59
$213,001.00 to $214,000.00
$1,740.75
$1131.49
$214,001.00 to $215,000.00
$1,746.75
$1135.39
$215,001.00 to $216,000.00
$1,752.75
$1139.29
$216,001.00 to $217,000.00
$1,758.75
$1143.19
$217,001.00 to $218,000.00
$1,764.75
$1147.09
$218,001.00 to $219,000.00
$1,770.75
$1150.99
$219,001.00 to $220,000.00
$1,776.75
$1154.89
$220,001.00 to $221,000.00
$1,782.75
$1158.79
$221,001.00 to $222,000.00
$1,788.75
$1162.69
$222,001.00 to $223,000.00
$1,794.75
$1166.59
$223,001.00 to $224,000.00
$1,800.75
$1170.49
$224,001.00 to $225,000.00
$1,806.75
$1174.39
$225,001.00 to $226,000.00
$1,812.75
$1178.29
$226,001.00 to $227,000.00
$1,818.75
$1182.19
$227,001.00 to $228,000.00
$1,824.75
$1186.09
$228,001.00 to $229,000.00
$1,830.75
$1189.99
$229,001.00 to $230,000.00
$1,836.75
$1193.89
$230,901.00 to $231,000.00
$1,842.75
$1197.79
$231,001.00 to $232,000.00
$1,848.75
$1201.69
$232,001.00 to $233,000.00
$1,854.75
$1205.59
$233,001.00 to $234,000.00
$1,860.75
$1209.49
$234,001.00 to $235,000.00
$1,866.75
$1213.39
$235,001.00 to $236,000.00
$1,872.75
$1217.29
$236,001.00 to $237,000.00
$1,878.75
$1221.19
$237,001.00 to $238,000.00
$1,884.75
$1225.09
$238,001.00 to $239,000.00
$1,890.75
$1228.99
$239,001.00 to $240,000.00
$1,896.75
$1232.89
$240,001.00 to $241,000.00
$1,902.75
$1236.79
$241,001.00 to $242,000.00
$1,908.75
$1240.69
$242,001.00 to $243,000.00
$1,914.75
$1244.59
$243,001.00 to $244,000.00
$1,920.75
$1248.49
$244,001.00 to $245,000.00
$1,926.75
$1252.39
$245,001.00 to $246,000.00
$1,932.75
$1256.29
$246,001.00 to $247,000.00
$1,938.75
$1260.19
$247,001.00 to $248,000.00
$1,944.75
$1264.09
$248,001.00 to $249,000.00
$1,950.75
$1267.99
$249,001.00 to $250,000.00
$1,956.75
$1271.89
$250,001.00 to $251,000.00
$1,962.75
$1275.79
$251,001.00 to $252,000.00
$1,968.75
$1279.69
$252,001.00 to $253,000.00
$1,974.75
$1283.59
$253,001.00 to $254,000.00
$1,980.75
$1287.49
$254,001.00 to $255,000.00
$1,986.75
$1291.39
$255,001.00 to $256,000.00
$1,992.75
$1295.29
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$256,001.00 to $257,000.00
$1,998.75
$1299.19
$257,001.00 to $258,000.00
$2,004.75
$1303.09
$258,001.00 to $259,000.00
$2,010.75
$1306.99
$259,001.00 to $260,000.00
$2,016.75
$1310.89
$260,001.00 to $260,000.00
$2,022.75
$1314.79
$261,001.00 to $262,000.00
$2,028.75
$1318.69
$262,001.00 to $263,000.00
$2,034.75
$1322.59
$263,001.00 to $264,000.00
$2,040.75
$1326.49
$264,001.00 to $265,000.00
$2,046.75
$1330.39
$265,001.00 to $266,000.00
$2,052.75
$1334.29
$266,001.00 to $267,000.00
$2,058.75
$1338.19
$267,001.00 to $268,000.00
$2,064.75
$1342.09
$268,001.00 to $269,000.00
$2,070.75
$1345.99
$269,001.00 to $270,000.00
$2,076.75
$1349.89
$170,001.00 to $271,000.00
$2,082.75
$1353.79
$271,001.00 to $272,000.00
$2,088.75
$1357.69
$272,001.00 to $273,000.00
$2,094.75
$1361.59
$273,001.00 to $274,000.00
$2,100.75
$1365.49
$274,001.00 to $275,000.00
$2,106.75
$1369.39
$275,001.00 to $276,000.00
$2,112.75
$1373.29
$276,001.00 to $277,000.00
$2,118.75
$1377.19
$277,001.00 to $278,000.00
$2,124.75
$1381.09
$278,001.00 to $279,000.00
$2,130.75
$1384.99
$279,001.00 to $280,000.00
$2,136.75
$1388.89
$280,001.00 to $281,000.00
$2,142.75
$1392.79
$281,001.00 to $282,000.00
$2,148.75
$1396.69
$282,001.00 to $283,000.00
$2,154.75
$1400.59
$283,001.00 to $284,000.00
$2,160.75
$1404.49
$284,001.00 to $285,000.00
$2,166.75
$1408.39
$285,001.00 to $286,000.00
$2,172.75
$1412.29
$286,001.00 to $287,000.00
$2,178.75
$1416.19
$287,001.00 to $288,000.00
$2,184.75
$1420.09
$288,001.00 to $289,000.00
$2,190.75
$1423.99
$289,001.00 to $290,000.00
$2,196.75
$1427.89
$290,001.00 to $291,000.00
$2,202.75
$1431.79
$291,001.00 to $292,000.00
$2,208.75
$1435.69
$292,001.00 to $293,000.00
$2,214.75
$1439.59
$293,001.00 to $294,000.00
$2,220.75
$1443.49
$294,001.00 to $295,000.00
$2,226.75
$1447.39
$295,001.00 to $296,000.00
$2,232.75
$1451.29
$296,001.00 to $297,000.00
$2,238.75
$1455.19
$297,001.00 to $298,000.00
$2,244.75
$1459.09
$298,001.00 to $299,000.00
$2,250.75
$1462.99
$299,001.00 to $300,000.00
$2,256.75
$1466.89
$300,001.00 to $301,000.00
$2,262.75
$1470.79
page 39
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$301,001.00 to $302,000.00
$2,268.75
$1474.69
$302,001.00 to $303,000.00
$2,274.75
$1478.59
$303,001.00 to $304,000.00
$2,280.75
$1482.49
$304,001.00 to $305,000.00
$2,286.75
$1486.39
$305,001.00 to $306,000.00
$2,292.75
$1490.29
$306,001.00 to $307,000.00
$2,298.75
$1494.19
$307,001.00 to $308,000.00
$2,304.75
$1498.09
$308,001.00 to $309,000.00
$2,310.75
$1501.99
$309,001.00 to $310,000.00
$2,316.75
$1505.89
$310,001.00 to $311,000.00
$2,322.75
$1509.79
$311,001.00 to $312,000.00
$2,328.75
$1513.69
$312,001.00 to $313,000.00
$2,334.75
$1517.59
$313,001.00 to $314,000.00
$2,340.75
$1521.49
$314,001.00 to $315,000.00
$2,346.75
$1525.39
$315,001.00 to $316,000.00
$2,352.75
$1529.29
$316,001.00 to $317,000.00
$2,358.75
$1533.19
$317,001.00 to $318,000.00
$2,364.75
$1537.09
$318,001.00 to $319,000.00
$2,370.75
$1540.99
$319,001.00 to $320,000.00
$2,376.75
$1544.89
$320,001.00 to $321,000.00
$2,382.75
$1548.79
$321,001.00 to $322,000.00
$2,388.75
$1552.69
$322,001.00 to $323,000.00
$2,394.75
$1556.59
$323,001.00 to $324,000.00
$2,400.75
$1560.49
$324,001.00 to $325,000.00
$2,406.75
$1564.39
$325,001.00 to $326,000.00
$2,412.75
$1568.29
$326,001.00 to $327,000.00
$2,418.75
$1572.19
$327,001.00 to $328,000.00
$2,424.75
$1576.09
$328,001.00 to $329,000.00
$2,430.75
$1579.99
$329,001.00 to $330,000.00
$2,436.75
$1583.89
$330,001.00 to $331,000.00
$2,442.75
$1587.79
$331,001.00 to $332,000.00
$2,448.75
$1591.69
$332,001.00 to $333,000.00
$2,454.75
$1595.59
$333,001.00 to $334,000.00
$2,460.75
$1599.49
$334,001.00 to $335,000.00
$2,466.75
$1603.39
$335,001.00 to $336,000.00
$2,472.75
$1607.29
$336,001.00 to $337,000.00
$2,478.75
$1611.19
$337,001.00 to $338,000.00
$2,484.75
$1615.09
$338,001.00 to $339,000.00
$2,490.75
$1618.99
$339,001.00 to $340,000.00
$2,496.75
$1622.89
$340,001.00 to $341,000.00
$2,502.75
$1626.79
$341,001.00 to $342,000.00
$2,508.75
$1630.69
$342,001.00 to $343,000.00
$2,514.75
$1634.59
$343,001.00 to $344,000.00
$2,520.75
$1638.49
$344,001.00 to $345,000.00
$2,526.75
$1642.39
$345,001.00 to $346,000.00
$2,532.75
$1646.29
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$346,001.00 to $347,000.00
$2,538.75
$1650.19
$347,001.00 to $348,000.00
$2,544.75
$1654.09
$348,001.00 to $349,000.00
$2,550.75
$1657.99
$349,001.00 to $350,000.00
$2,556.75
$1661.89
$350,001.00 to $351,000.00
$2,562.75
$1665.79
$351,001.00 to $352,000.00
$2,568.75
$1669.69
$352,001.00 to $353,000.00
$2,574.75
$1673.59
$353,001.00 to $354,000.00
$2,580.75
$1677.49
$354,001.00 to $355,000.00
$2,586.75
$1681.39
$355,001.00 to $356,000.00
$2,592.75
$1685.29
$356,001.00. to $357,000.00
$2,598.75
$1689.19
$357,001.00 to $358,000.00
$2,604.75
$1693.09
$358,001.00 to $359,000.00
$2,610.75
$1696.99
$359,001.00 to $360,000.00
$2,616.75
$1700.89
$360,001.00 to $361,000.00
$2,622.75
$1704.79
$361,001.00 to $362,000.00
$2,628.75
$1708.69
$362,001.00 to $363,000.00
$2,634.75
$1712.59
$363,001.00 to $364,000.00
$2,640.75
$1716.49
$364,001.00 to $365,000.00
$2,646.75
$1720.39
$365,001.00 to $366,000.00
$2,652.75
$1724.29
$366,001.00 to $367,000.00
$2,658.75
$1728.19
$367,001.00 to $368,000.00
$2,664.75
$1732.09
$368,001.00 to $369,000.00
$2,670.75
$1735.99
$369,001.00 to $370,000.00
$2,676.75
$1739.89
$370,001.00 to $371,000.00
$2,682.75
$1743.79
$371,001.00 to $372,000.00
$2,688.75
$1747.69
$372,001.00 to $373,000.00
$2,694.75
$1751.59
$373,001.00 to $374,000.00
$2,700.75
$1755.49
$374,001.00 to $375,000.00
$2,706.75
$1759.39
$375,001.00 to $376,000.00
$2,712.75
$1763.29
$376,001.00 to $377,000.00
$2,718.75
$1767.19
$377,001.00 to $378,000.00
$2,724.75
$1771.09
$378,001.00 to $379,000.00
$2,730.75
$1774.99
$379,001.00 to $380,000.00
$2,736.75
$1778.89
$380,001.00 to $381,000.00
$2,742.75
$1782.79
$381,001.00 to $382,000.00
$2,748.75
$1786.69
$382,001.00 to $383,000.00
$2,754.75
$1790.59
$383,001.00 to $384,000.00
$2,760.75
$1794.49
$384,001.00 to $385,000.00
$2,766.75
$1798.39
$385,001.00 to $386,000.00
$2,772.75
$1802.29
$386,001.00 to $387,000.00
$2,778.75
$1806.19
$387,001.00 to $388,000.00
$2,784.75
$1810.09
$388,001.00 to $389,000.00
$2,790.75
$1813.99
$389,001.00 to $390,000.00
$2,796.75
$1817.89
$390,001.00 to $391,000.00
$2,802.75
$1821.79
page 40
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$391,001.00 to $392,000.00
$2,808.75
$1825.69
$392,001.00 to $393,000.00
$2,814.75
$1829.59
$393,001.00 to $394,000.00
$2,820.75
$1833.49
$394,001.00 to $395,000.00
$2,826.75
$1837.39
$395,001.00 to $396,000.00
$2,832.75
$1841.29
$396,001.00 to $397,000.00
$2,838.75
$1845.19
$397,001.00 to $398,000.00
$2,844.75
$1849.09
$398,001.00 to $399,000.00
$2,850.75
$1852.99
$399,001.00 to $400,000.00
$2,856.75
$1856.89
$400,001.00 to $401,000.00
$2,862.75
$1860.79
$401,001.00 to $402,000.00
$2,868.75
$1864.69
$402,001.00 to $403,000.00
$2,874.75
$1868.59
$403,001.00 to $404,000.00
$2,880.75
$1872.49
$404,001.00 to $405,000.00
$2,886.75
$1876.39
$405,001.00 to $406,000.00
$2,892.75
$1880.29
$406,001.00 to $407,000.00
$2,898.75
$1884.19
$407,001.00 to $408,000.00
$2,904.75
$1888.09
$408,001.00 to $409,000.00
$2,910.75
$1891.99
$409,001.00 to $410,000.00
$2,916.75
$1895.89
$410,001.00 to $411,000.00
$2,922.75
$1899.79
$411,001.00 to $412,000.00
$2,928.75
$1903.69
$412,001.00 to $413,000.00
$2,934.75
$1907.59
$413,001.00 to $414,000.00
$2,940.75
$1911.49
$414,001.00 to $415,000.00
$2,946.75
$1915.39
$415,001.00 to $416,000.00
$2,952.75
$1919.29
$416,001.00 to $417,000.00
$2,958.75
$1923.19
$417,001.00 to $418,000.00
$2,964.75
$1927.09
$418,001.00 to $419,000.00
$2,970.75
$1930.99
$419,001.00 to $420,000.00
$2,976.75
$1934.89
$420,001.00 to $421,000.00
$2,982.75
$1938.79
$421,001.00 to $422,000.00
$2,988.75
$1942.69
$422,001.00 to $423,000.00
$2,994.75
$1946.59
$423,001.00 to $424,000.00
$3,000.75
$1950.49
$424,001.00 to $425,000.00
$3,006.75
$1954.39
$425,001.00 to $426,000.00
$3,012.75
$1958.29
$426,001.00 to $427,000.00
$3,018.75
$1962.19
$427,001.00 to $428,000.00
$3,024.75
$1966.09
$428,001.00 to $429,000_00
$3,030.75
$1969.99
$429,001.00 to $430,000.00
$3,036.75
$1973.89
$430,001.00 to $431,000.00
$3,042.75
$1977.79
$431,001.00 to $432,000.00
$3,048.75
$1981.69
$432,001.00 to $433,000.00
$3,054.75
$1985.59
$433,001.00 to $434,000.00
$3,060.75
$1989.49
$434,001.00 to $435,000.00
$3,066.75
$1993.39
$435,001.00 to $436,000.00
$3,072.75
$1997.29
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$436,001.00 to $437,000.00
$3,078.75
$2001.19
$437,001.00 to $438,000.00
$3,084.75
$2005.09
$438,001.00 to $439,000.00
$3,090.75
$2008.99
$439,001.00 to $440,000.00
$3,096.75
$2012.89
$440,001.00 to $441,000.00
$3,102.75
$2016.79
$441,001.00 to $442,000.00
$3,108.75
$2020.69
$442,001.00 to $443,000.00
$3,114.75
$2024.59
$443,001.00 to $444,000.00
$3,120.75
$2028.49
$444,001.00 to $445,000.00
$3,126.75
$2032.39
$445,001.00 to $446,000.00
$3,132.75
$2036.29
$446,001.00 to $447,000.00
$3,138.75
$2040.19
$447,001.00 to $448,000.00
$3,144.75
$2044.09
$448,001.00 to $449,000.00
$3,150.75
$2047.99
$449,001.00 to $450,000.00
$3,156.75
$2051.89
$450,001.00 to $451,000.00
$3,162.75
$2055.79
$451,001.00 to $452,000.00
$3,168.75
$2059.69
$452,001.00 to $453,000.00
$3,174.75
$2063.59
$453,001.00 to $454,000.00
$3,180.75
$2067.49
$454,001.00 to $455,000.00
$3,186.75
$2071.39
$455,001.00 to $456,000.00
$3,192.75
$2075.29
$456,001.00 to $457,000.00
$3,198.75
$2079.19
$457,001.00 to $458,000.00
$3,204.75
$2083.09
$458,001.00 to $459,000.00
$3,210.75
$2086.99
$459,001.00 to $460,000.00
$3,216.75
$2090.89
$460,001.00 to $461,000.00
$3,222.75
$2094.79
$461,001.00 to $462,000.00
$3,228.75
$2098.69
$462,001.00 to $463,000.00
$3,234.75
$2102.59
$463,001.00 to $464,000.00
$3,240.75
$2106.49
$464,001.00 to $465,000.00
$3,246.75
$2110.39
$465,001.00 to $466,000.00
$3,252.75
$2114.29
$466,001.09 to $467,000.00
$3,258.75
$2118.19
$467,001.00 to $468,000.00
$3,264.75
$2122.09
$468,001.00 to $469,000.00
$3,270.75
$2125.99
$469,001.00 to $470,000.00
$3,276.75
$2129.89
$470,001.00 to $471,000.00
$3,282.75
$2133.79
$471,001.00 to $472,000.00
$3,288.75
$2137.69
$472,001.00 to $473,000.00
$3,294.75
$2141.59
$473,001.00 to $474,000.00
$3,300.75
$2145.49
$474,001.00 to $475,000.00
$3,306.75
$2149.39
$475,001.00 to $476,000.00
$3,312.75
$2153.29
$476,001.00 to $477,000.00
$3,318.75
$2157.19
$477,001.00 to $478,000.00
$3,324.75
$2161.09
$478,001.00 to $479,000.00
$3,330.75
$2164.99
$479,001.00 to $480,000.00
$3,336.75
$2168.89
$480,001.00 to $481,000.00
$3,342.75
$2172.79
page 41
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$481,001.00 to $482,000.00
$3,348.75
$2176.69
$482,001.00 to $483,000.00
$3,354.75
$2180.59
$483,001.00 to $484,000.00
$3,360.75
$2184.49
$484,001.00 to $485,000.00
$3,366.75
$2188.39
$485,001.00 to $486,000.00
$3,372.75
$2192.29
$486,001.00 to $487,000.00
$3,378.75
$2196.19
$487,001.00 to $488,000.00
$3,384.75
$2200.09
$488,001.00 to $489,000.00
$3,390.75
$2203.99
$489,001.00 to $490,000.00
$3,396.75
$2207.89
$490,001.00 to $491,000.00
$3,402.75
$2211.79
$491,001.00 to $492,000.00
$3,408.75
$2215.69
$492,001.00 to $493,000.00
$3,414.75
$2219.59
$493,001.00 to $494,000.00
$3,420.75
$2223.49
$494,001.00 to $495,000.00
$3,426.75
$2227.39
$495,001.00 to $496,000.00
$3,432.75
$2231.29
$496,001.00 to $497,000.00
$3,438.75
$2235.19
$497,001.00 to $498,000.00
$3,444.75
$2239.09
$498,001.00 to $499,000.00
$3,450.75
$2242.99
$499,001.00 to $500,000.00
$3,456.75
$2246.89
$500,001.00 to $501,000.00
$3,461.75
$2250.14
$501,001.00 to $502,000.00
$3,466.75
$2253.39
$502,001.00 to $503,000.00
$3,471.75
$2256.64
$503,001.00 to $504,000.00
$3,476.75
$2259.89
$504,001.00 to $505,000.00
$3,481.75
$2263.14
$505,001.00 to $506,000.00
$3,486.75
$2266.39
$506,001.00 to $507,000.00
$3,491.75
$2269.64
$507,001.00 to $508,000.00
$3,496.75
$2272.89
$508,001.00 to $509,000.00
$3,501.75
$2276.14
$509,001.00 to $510,000.00
$3,506.75
$2279.39
$510,001.00 to $511,000.00
$3,511.75
$2282.64
$511,001.00 to $512,000.00
$3,516.75
$2285.89
$512,001.00 to $513,000.00
$3,521.75
$2289.14
$513,001.00 to $514,000.00
$3,526.75
$2292.39
$514,001.00 to $515,000.00
$3,531.75
$2295.64
$515,001.00 to $516,000.00
$3,536.75
$2298.89
$516,001.00 to $517,000.00
$3,541.75
$2302.14
$517,001.00 to $518,000.00
$3,546.75
$2305.39
$518,001.00 to $519,000.00
$3,551.75
$2308.64
$519,001.00 to $520,000.00
$3,556.75
$2311.89
$520,001.00 to $521,000.00
$3,561.75
$2315.14
$521,001.00 to $522,000.00
$3,566.75
$2318.39
$522,001.00 to $523,000.00
$3,571.75
$2321.64
$523,001.00 to $524,000.00
$3,576.75
$2324.89
$524,001.00 to $525,000.00
$3,581.75
$2328.14
$525,001.00 to $526,000.00
$3,586.75
$2331.39
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$526,001.00 to $527,000.00
$3,591.75
$2334.64
$527,001.00 to $528,000.00
$3,596.75
$2337.89
$528,001.00 to $529,000.00
$3,601.75
$2341.14
$529,001.00 to $530,000.00
$3,606.75
$2344.39
$530,001.00 to $531,000.00
$3,611.75
$2347.64
$531,001.00 to $532,000.00
$3,616.75
$2350.89
$532,001.00 to $533,000.00
$3,621.75
$2354.14
$533,001.00 to $534,000.00
$3,626.75
$2357.39
$534,001.00 to $535,000.00
$3,631.75
$2360.64
$535,001.00 to $536,000.00
$3,636.75
$2363.89
$536,001.00 to $537,000.00
$3,641.75
$2367.14
$537,001.00 to $538,000.00
$3,646.75
$2370.39
$538,001.00 to $539,000.00
$3,651.75
$2373.64
$539,001.00 to $540,000.00
$3,656.75
$2376.89
$540,001.00 to $541,000.00
$3,661.75
$2380.14
$541,001.00 to $542,000.00
$3,666.75
$2383.39
$542,001.00 to $543,000.00
$3,671.75
$2386.64
$543,001.00 to $544,000.00
$3,676.75
$2389.89
$544,001.00 to $545,000.00
$3,681.75
$2393.14
$545,001.00 to $546,000.00
$3,686.75
$2396.39
$546,001.00 to $547,000.00
$3,691.75
$2399.64
$547,001.00 to $548,000.00
$3,696.75
$2402.89
$548,001.00 to $549,000.00
$3,701.75
$2406.14
$549,001.00 to $550,000.00
$3,706.75
$2409.39
$550,001.00 to $551,000.00
$3,711.75
$2412.64
$551,001.00 to $552,000.00
$3,716.75
$2415.89
$552,001.00 to $553,000.00
$3,721.75
$2419.14
$553,001.00 to $554,000.00
$3,726.75
$2422.39
$554,001.00 to $555,000.00
$3,731.75
$2425.64
$555,001.00 to $556,000.00
$3,736.75
$2428.89
$556,001.00 to $557,000.00
$3,741.75
$2432.14
$557,001.00 to $558,000.00
$3,746.75
$2435.39
$558,001.00 to $559,000.00
$3,751.75
$2438.64
$559,001.00 to $560,000.00
$3,756.75
$2441.89
$560,001.00 to $561,000.00
$3,761.75
$2445.14
$561,001.00 to $562,000.00
$3,766.75
$2448.39
$562,001.00 to $563,000.00
$3,771.75
$2451.64
$563,001.00 to $564,000.00
$3,776.75
$2454.89
$564,001.00 to $565,000.00
$3,781.75
$2458.14
$565,001.00 to $566,000.00
$3,786.75
$2461.39
$566,001.00 to $567,000.00
$3,791.75
$2464.64
$567,001.00 to $568,000.00
$3,796.75
$2467.89
$568,001.00 to $569,000.00
$3,801.75
$2471.14
$569,001.00 to $570,000.00
$3,806.75
$2474.39
$570,001.00 to $571,000.00
$3,811.75
$2477.64
page 42
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$571,001.00 to $572,000.00
$3,816.75
$2480.89
$572,001.00 to $573,000.00
$3,821.75
$2484.14
$573,001.00 to $574,000.00
$3,826.75
$2487.39
$574,001.00 to $575,000.00
$3,831.75
$2490.64
$575,001.00 to $576,000.00
$3,836.75
$2493.89
$576,001.00 to $577,000.00
$3,841.75
$2497.14
$577,001.00 to $578,000.00
$3,846.75
$2500.39
$578,001.00 to $579,000.00
$3,851.75
$2503.64
$579,001.00 to $580,000.00
$3,856.75
$2506.89
$580,001.00 to $581,000.00
$3,861.75
$2510.14
$581,001.00 to $582,000.00
$3,866.75
$2513.39
$582,001.00 to $583,000.00
$3,871.75
$2516.64
$583,001.00 to $584,000.00
$3,876.75
$2519.89
$584,001.00 to $585,000.00
$3,881.75
$2523.14
$585,001.00 to $586,000.00
$3,886.75
$2526.39
$586,001.00 to $587,000.00
$3,891.75
$2529.64
$587,001.00 to $588,000.00
$3,896.75
$2532.89
$588,001.00 to $589,000.00
$3,901.75
$2536.14
$589,001.00 to $590,000.00
$3,906.75
$2539.39
$590,001.00 to $591,000.00
$3,911.75
$2542.64
$591,001.00 to $592,000.00
$3,916.75
$2545.89
$592,001.00 to $593,000.00
$3,921.75
$2549.14
$593,001.00 to $594,000.00
$3,926.75
$2552.39
$594,001.00 to $595,000.00
$3,931.75
$2555.64
$595,001.00 to $596,000.00
$3,936.75
$2558.89
$596,001.00 to $597,000.00
$3,941.75
$2562.14
$597,001.00 to $598,000.00
$3,946.75
$2565.39
$598,001.00 to $599,000.00
$3,951.75
$2568.64
$599,001.00 to $600,000.00
$3,956.75
$2571.89
$600,001.00 to $601,000.00
$3,961.75
$2575.14
$601 ,001.00 to $602,000.00
$3,966.75
$2578.39
$602,001.00 to $603,000.00
$3,971.75
$2581.64
$603,001.00 to $604,000.00
$3,976.75
$2584.89
$604,001.00 to $605,000.00
$3,981.75
$2588.14
$605,001.00 to $606,000.00
$3,986.75
$2591.39
$606,001.00 to $607,000.00
$3,991.75
$2594.64
$607,001.00 to $608,000.00
$3,996.75
$2597.89
$608,001.00 to $609,000.00
$4,001.75
$2601.14
$609,001.00 to $610,000.00
$4,006.75
$2604.39
$610,001.00 to $611,000.00
$4,011.75
$2607.64
$611,001.00 to $612,000.00
$4,016.75
$2610.89
$612,001.00 to $613,000.00
$4,021.75
$2614.14
$613,001.00 to $614,000.00
$4,026.75
$2617.39
$614,001.00 to $615,000.00
$4,031.75
$2620.64
$615,001.00 to $616,000.00
$4,036.75
$2623.89
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$616,001.00 to $617,000.00
$4,041.75
$2627.14
$617,001.00 to $618,000.00
$4,046.75
$2630.39
$618,001.00 to $619,000.00
$4,051.75
$2633.64
$619,001.00 to $620,000.00
$4,056.75
$2636.89
$620,001.00 to $621,000.00
$4,061.75
$2640.14
$621,001.00 to $622,000.00
$4,066.75
$2643.39
$622,001.00 to $623,000.00
$4,071.75
$2646.64
$623,001.00 to $624,000.00
$4,076.75
$2649.89
$624,001.00 to $625,000.00
$4,081.75
$2653.14
$625,001.00 to $626,000.00
$4,086.75
$2656.39
$626,001.00 to $627,000.00
$4,091.75
$2659.64
$627,001.00 to $628,000.00
$4,096.75
$2662.89
$628,001.00 to $629,000.00
$4,101.75
$2666.14
$629,001.00 to $630,000.00
$4,106.75
$2669.39
$630,001.00 to $631,000.00
$4,111.75
$2672.64
$631,001.00 to $632,000.00
$4,116.75
$2675.89
$632,001.00 to $633,000.00
$4,121.75
$2679.14
$633,001.00 to $634,000.00
$4,126.75
$2682.39
$634,001.00 to $635,000.00
$4,131.75
$2685.64
$635,001.00 to $636,000.00
$4,136.75
$2688.89
$636,001.00 to $637,000.00
$4,141.75
$2692.14
$637,001.00 to $638,000.00
$4,146.75
$2695.39
$638,001.00 to $639,000.00
$4,151.75
$2698.64
$639,001.00 to $640,000.00
$4,156.75
$2701.89
$640,001.00 to $641,000.00
$4,161.75
$2705.14
$641,001.00 to $642,000.00
$4,166.75
$2708.39
$642,001.00 to $643,000.00
$4,171.75
$2711.64
$643,001.00 to $644,000.00
$4,176.75
$2714.89
$644,001.00 to $645,000.00
$4,181.75
$2718.14
$645,001.00 to $646,000.00
$4,186.75
$2721.39
$646,001.00 to $647,000.00
$4,191.75
$2724.64
$647,001.00 to $648,000.00
$4,196.75
$2727.89
$648,001.00 to $649,000.00
$4,201.75
$2731.14
$649,001.00 to $650,000.00
$4,206.75
$2734.39
$650,001.00 to $651,000.00
$4,211.75
$2737.64
$651,001.00 to $652,000.00
$4,216.75
$2740.89
$652,001.00 to $653,000.00
$4,221.75
$2744.14
$653,001.00 to $654,000.00
$4,226.75
$2747.39
$654,001.00 to $655,000.00
$4,231.75
$2750.64
$655,001.00 to $656,000.00
$4,236.75
$2753.89
$656,001.00 to $657,000.00
$4,241.75
$2757.14
$657,001.00 to $658,000.00
$4,246.75
$2760.39
$658,001.00 to $659,000.00
$4,251.75
$2763.64
$659,001.00 to $660,000.00
$4,256.75
$2766.89
$660,001.00 to $661,000.00
$4,261.75
$2770.14
page 43
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$661,001.00 to $662,000.00
$4,266.75
$2773.39
$662,001.00 to $663,000.00
$4,271.75
$2776.64
$663,001.00 to $664,000.00
$4,276.75
$2779.89
$664,001.00 to $665,000.00
$4,281.75
$2783.14
$665,001.00 to $666,000.00
$4,286.75
$2786.39
$666,001.00 to $667,000.00
$4,291.75
$2789.64
$667,001.00 to $668,000.00
$4,296.75
$2792.89
$668,001.00 to $669,000.00
$4,301.75
$2796.14
$669,001.00 to $670,000.00
$4,306.75
$2799.39
$670,001.00 to $671,000.00
$4,311.75
$2802.64
$671,001.00 to $672,000.00
$4,316.75
$2805.89
$672,001.00 to $673,000.00
$4,321.75
$2809.14
$673,001.00 to $674,000.00
$4,326.75
$2812.39
$674,001.00 to $675,000.00
$4,331.75
$2815.64
$675,001.00 to $676,000.00
$4,336.75
$2818.89
$676,001.00 to $677,000.00
$4,341.75
$2822.14
$677,001.00 to $678,000.00
$4,346.75
$2825.39
$678,001.00 to $679,000.00
$4,351.75
$2828.64
$679,001.00 to $680,000.00
$4,356.75
$2831.89
$680,001.00 to $681,000.00
$4,361.75
$2835.14
$681,001.00 to $682,000.00
$4,366.75
$2838.39
$682,001.00 to $683,000.00
$4,371.75
$2841.64
$683,001.00 to $684,000.00
$4,376.75
$2844.89
$684,001.00 to $685,000.00
$4,381.75
$2848.14
$685,001.00 to $686,000.00
$4,386.75
$2851.39
$686,001.00 to $687,000.00
$4,391.75
$2854.64
$687,001.00 to $688,000.00
$4,396.75
$2857.89
$688,001.00 to $689,000.00
$4,401.75
$2861.14
$689,001.00 to $690,000.00
$4,406.75
$2864.39
$690,001.00 to $691,000.00
$4,411.75
$2867.64
$691,001.00 to $692,000.00
$4,416.75
$2870.89
$692,001.00 to $693,000.00
$4,421.75
$2874.14
$693,001.00 to $694,000.00
$4,426.75
$2877.39
$694,001.00 to $695,000.00
$4,431.75
$2880.64
$695,001.00 to $696,000.00
$4,436.75
$2883.89
$696,001.00 to $697,000.00
$4,441.75
$2887.14
$697,001.00 to $698,000.00
$4,446.75
$2890.39
$698,001.00 to $699,000.00
$4,451.75
$2893.64
$699,001.00 to $700,000.00
$4,456.75
$2896.89
$700,001.00 to $701,000.00
$4,461.75
$2900.14
$701,001.00 to $702,000.00
$4,466.75
$2903.39
$702,001.00 to $703,000.00
$4,471.75
$2906.64
$703,001.00 to $704,000.00
$4,476.75
$2909.89
$704,001.00 to $705,000.00
$4,481.75
$2913.14
$705,001.00 to $706,000.00
$4,486.75
$2916.39
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$706,001.00 to $707,000.00
$4,491.75
$2919.64
$707,001.00 to $708,000.00
$4,496.75
$2922.89
$708,001.00 to $709,000.00
$4,501.75
$2926.14
$709,001.00 to $710,000.00
$4,506.75
$2929.39
$710,001.00 to $711,000.00
$4,511.75
$2932.64
$711,001.00 to $712,000.00
$4,516.75
$2935.89
$712,001.00 to $713,000.00
$4,521.75
$2939.14
$713,001.00 to $714,000.00
$4,526.75
$2942.39
$714,001.00 to $715,000.00
$4,531.75
$2945.64
$715,001.00 to $716,000.00
$4,536.75
$2948.89
$716,001.00 to $717,000.00
$4,541.75
$2952.14
$717,001.00 to $718,000.00
$4,546.75
$2955.39
$718,001.00 to $719,000.00
$4,551.75
$2958.64
$719,001.00 to $720,000.00
$4,556.75
$2961.89
$720,001.00 to $721,000.00
$4,561.75
$2965.14
$721,001.00 to $722,000.00
$4,566.75
$2968.39
$722,001.00 to $723,000.00
$4,571.75
$2971.64
$723,001.00 to $724,000.00
$4,576.75
$2974.89
$724,001.00 to $725,000.00
$4,581.75
$2978.14
$725,001.00 to $726,000.00
$4,586.75
$2981.39
$726,001.00 to $727,000.00
$4,591.75
$2984.64
$727,001.00 to $728,000.00
$4,596.75
$2987.89
$728,001.00 to $729,000.00
$4,601.75
$2991.14
$729,001.00 to $730,000.00
$4,606.75
$2994.39
$730,001.00 to $731,000.00
$4,611.75
$2997.64
$731,001.00 to $732,000.00
$4,616.75
$3000.89
$732,001.00 to $733,000.00
$4,621.75
$3004.14
$733,001.00 to $734,000.00
$4,626.75
$3007.39
$734,001.00 to $735,000.00
$4,631.75
$3010.64
$735,001.00 to $736,000.00
$4,636.75
$3013.89
$736,001.00 to $737,000.00
$4,641.75
$3017.14
$737,001.00 to $738,000.00
$4,646.75
$3020.39
$738,001.00 to $739,000.00
$4,651.75
$3023.64
$739,001.00 to $740,000.00
$4,656.75
$3026.89
$740,001.00 to $741,000.00
$4,661.75
$3030.14
$741,001.00 to $742,000.00
$4,666.75
$3033.39
$742,001.00 to $743,000.00
$4,671.75
$3036.64
$743,001.00 to $744,000.00
$4,676.75
$3039.89
$744,001.00 to $745,000.00
$4,681.75
$3043.14
$745,001.00 to $746,000.00
$4,686.75
$3046.39
$746,001.00 to $747,000.00
$4,691.75
$3049.64
$747,001.00 to $748,000.00
$4,696.75
$3052.89
$748,001.00 to $749,000.00
$4,701.75
$3056.14
$749,001.00 to $750,000.00
$4,706.75
$3059.39
$750,001.00 to $751,000.00
$4,711.75
$3062.64
page 44
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$751,001.00 to $752,000.00
$4,716.75
$3065.89
$752,001.00 to $753,000.00
$4,721.75
$3069.14
$753,001.00 to $754,000.00
$4,726.75
$3072.39
$754,001.00 to $755,000.00
$4,731.75
$3075.64
$755,001.00 to $756,000.00
$4,736.75
$3078.89
$756,001.00 to $757,000.00
$4,741.75
$3082.14
$757,001.00 to $758,000.00
$4,746.75
$3085.39
$758,001.00 to $759,000.00
$4,751.75
$3088.64
$759,001.00 to $760,000.00
$4,756.75
$3091.89
$760,001.00 to $761,000.00
$4,761.75
$3095.14
$761,001.00 to $762,000.00
$4,766.75
$3098.39
$762,001.00 to $763,000.00
$4,771.75
$3101.64
$763,001.00 to $764,000.00
$4,776.75
$3104.89
$764,001.00 to $765,000.00
$4,781.75
$3108.14
$765,001.00 to $766,000.00
$4,786.75
$3111.39
$766,001.00 to $767,000.00
$4,791.75
$3114.64
$767,001.00 to $768,000.00
$4,796.75
$3117.89
$768,001.00 to $769,000.00
$4,801.75
$3121.14
$769,001.00 to $770,000.00
$4,806.75
$3124.39
$770,001.00 to $771,000.00
$4,811.75
$3127.64
$771,001.00 to $772,000.00
$4,816.75
$3130.89
$772,001.00 to $773,000.00
$4,821.75
$3134.14
$773,001.00 to $774,000.00
$4,826.75
$3137.39
$774,001.00 to $775,000.00
$4,831.75
$3140.64
$775,001.00 to $776,000.00
$4,836.75
$3143.89
$776,001.00 to $777,000.00
$4,841.75
$3147.14
$777,001.00 to $778,000.00
$4,846.75
$3150.39
$778,001.00 to $779,000.00
$4,851.75
$3153.64
$779,001.00 to $780,000.00
$4,856.75
$3156.89
$780,001.00 to $781,000.00
$4,861.75
$3160.14
$781,001.00 to $782,000.00
$4,866.75
$3163.39
$782,001.00 to $783,000.00
$4,871.75
$3166.64
$783,001.00 to $784,000.00
$4,876.75
$3169.89
$784,001.00 to $785,000.00
$4,881.75
$3173.14
$785,001.00 to $786,000.00
$4,886.75
$3176.39
$786,001.00 to $787,000.00
$4,891.75
$3179.64
$787,001.00 to $788,000.00
$4,896.75
$3182.89
$788,001.00 to $789,000.00
$4,901.75
$3186.14
$789,001.00 to $790,000.00
$4,906.75
$3189.39
$790,001.00 to $791,000.00
$4,911.75
$3192.64
$791,001.00 to $792,000.00
$4,916.75
$3195.89
$792,001.00 to $793,000.00
$4,921.75
$3199.14
$793,001.00 to $794,000.00
$4,926.75
$3202.39
$794,001.00 to $795,000.00
$4,931.75
$3205.64
$795,001.00 to $796,000.00
$4,936.75
$3208.89
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$796,001.00 to $797,000.00
$4,941.75
$3212.14
$797,001.00 to $798,000.00
$4,946.75
$3215.39
$798,001.00 to $799,000.00
$4,951.75
$3218.64
$799,001.00 to $800,000.00
$4,956.75
$3221.89
$800,001.00 to $801,000.00
$4,961.75
$3225.14
$801,001.00 to $802,000.00
$4,966.75
$3228.39
$802,001.00 to $803,000.00
$4,971.75
$3231.64
$803,001.00 to $804,000.00
$4,976.75
$3234.89
$804,001.00 to $805,000.00
$4,981.75
$3238.14
$805,001.00 to $806,000.00
$4,986.75
$3241.39
$806,001.00 to $807,000.00
$4,991.75
$3244.64
$807,001.00 to $808,000.00
$4,996.75
$3247.89
$808,001.00 to $809,000.00
$5,001.75
$3251.14
$809,001.00 to $810,000.00
$5,006.75
$3254.39
$810,001.00 to $811,000.00
$5,011.75
$3257.64
$811,001.00 to $812,000.00
$5,016.75
$3260.89
$812,001.00 to $813,000.00
$5,021.75
$3264.14
$813,001.00 to $814,000.00
$5,026.75
$3267.39
$814,001.00 to $815,000.00
$5,031.75
$3270.64
$815,001.00 to $816,000.00
$5,036.75
$3273.89
$816,001.00 to $817,000.00
$5,041.75
$3277.14
$817,001.00 to $818,000.00
$5,046.75
$3280.39
$818,001.00 to $819,000.00
$5,051.75
$3283.64
$819,001.00 to $820,000.00
$5,056.75
$3286.89
$820,001.00 to $821,000.00
$5,061.75
$3290.14
$821,001.00 to $822,000.00
$5,066.75
$3293.39
$822,001.00 to $823,000.00
$5,071.75
$3296.64
$823,001.00 to $824,000.00
$5,076.75
$3299.89
$824,001.00 to $825,000.00
$5,081.75
$3303.14
$825,001.00 to $826,000.00
$5,086.75
$3306.39
$826,001.00 to $827,000.00
$5,091.75
$3309.64
$827,001.00 to $828,000.00
$5,096.75
$3312.89
$828,001.00 to $829,000.00
$5,101.75
$3316.14
$829,001.00 to $830,000.00
$5,106.75
$3319.39
$830,001.00 to $831,000.00
$5,111.75
$3322.64
$831,001.00 to $832,000.00
$5,116.75
$3325.89
$832,001.00 to $833,000.00
$5,121.75
$3329.14
$833,001.00 to $834,000.00
$5,126.75
$3332.39
$834,001.00 to $835,000.00
$5,131.75
$3335.64
$835,001.00 to $836,000.00
$5,136.75
$3338.89
$836,001.00 to $837,000.00
$5,141.75
$3342.14
$837,001.00 to $838,000.00
$5,146.75
$3345.39
$838,001.00 to $839,000.00
$5,151.75
$3348.64
$839,001.00 to $840,000.00
$5,156.75
$3351.89
$840,001.00 to $841,000.00
$5,161.75
$3355.14
page 45
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$841,001.00 to $842,000.00
$5,166.75
$3358.39
$842,001.00 to $843,000.00
$5,171.75
$3361.64
$843,001.00 to $844,000.00
$5,176.75
$3364.89
$844,001.00 to $845,000.00
$5,181.75
$3368.14
$845,001.00 to $846,000.00
$5,186.75
$3371.39
$846,001.00 to $847,000.00
$5,191.75
$3374.64
$847,001.00 to $848,000.00
$5,196.75
$3377.89
$848,001.00 to $849,000.00
$5,201.75
$3381.14
$849,001.00 to $850,000.00
$5,206.75
$3384.39
$850,001.00 to $851,000.00
$5,211.75
$3387.64
$851,001.00 to $852,000.00
$5,216.75
$3390.89
$852,001.00 to $853,000.00
$5,221.75
$3394.14
$853,001.00 to $854,000.00
$5,226.75
$3397.39
$854,001.00 to $855,000.00
$5,231.75
$3400.64
$855,001.00 to $856,000.00
$5,236.75
$3403.89
$856,001.09 to $857,000.00
$5,241.75
$3407.14
$857,001.00 to $858,000.00
$5,246.75
$3410.39
$858,001.00 to $859,000.00
$5,251.75
$3413.64
$859,001.00 to $860,000.00
$5,256.75
$3416.89
$860,001.00 to $861,000.00
$5,261.75
$3420.14
$861,001.00 to $862,000.00
$5,266.75
$3423.39
$862,001.00 to $863,000.00
$5,271.75
$3426.64
$863,001.00 to $864,000.00
$5,276.75
$3429.89
$864,001.00 to $865,000.00
$5,281.75
$3433.14
$865,001.00 to $866,000.00
$5,286.75
$3436.39
$866,001.00 to $867,000.00
$5,291.75
$3439.64
$867,001.00 to $868,000.00
$5,296.75
$3442.89
$868,001.00 to $869,000.00
$5,301.75
$3446.14
$869,001.00 to $870,000.00
$5,306.75
$3449.39
$870,001.00 to $871,000.00
$5,311.75
$3452.64
$871,001.00 to $872,000.00
$5,316.75
$3455.89
$872,001.00 to $873,000.00
$5,321.75
$3459.14
$873,001.00 to $874,000.00
$5,326.75
$3462.39
$874,001.00 to $875,000.00
$5,331.75
$3465.64
$875,001.00 to $876,000.00
$5,336.75
$3468.89
$876,001.00 to $877,000.00
$5,341.75
$3472.14
$877,00 1.00 to $878,000.00
$5,346.75
$3475.39
$878,001.00 to $879,000.00
$5,351.75
$3478.64
$879,001.00 to $880,000.00
$5,356.75
$3481.89
$880,001.00 to $881,000.00
$5,361.75
$3485.14
$881,001.00 to $882,000.00
$5,366.75
$3488.39
$882,001.00 to $883,000.00
$5,371.75
$3491.64
$883,001.00 to $884,000.00
$5,376.75
$3494.89
$884,001.00 to $885,000.00
$5,381.75
$3498.14
$885,001.00 to $886,000.00
$5,386.75
$3501.39
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$886,001.00 to $887,000.00
$5,391.75
$3504.64
$887,001.00 to $888,000.00
$5,396.75
$3507.89
$888,001.00 to $889,000.00
$5,401.75
$3511.14
$889,001.00 to $890,000.00
$5,406.75
$3514.39
$890,001.00 to $891,000.00
$5,411.75
$3517.64
$891,001.00 to $892,000.00
$5,416.75
$3520.89
$892,001.00 to $893,000.00
$5,421.75
$3524.14
$893,001.00 to $894,000.00
$5,426.75
$3527.39
$894,001.00 to $895,000.00
$5,431.75
$3530.64
$895,001.00 to $896,000.00
$5,436.75
$3533.89
$896,001.00 to $897,000.00
$5,441.75
$3537.14
$897,001.00 to $898,000.00
$5,446.75
$3540.39
$898,001.00 to $899,000.00
$5,451.75
$3543.64
$899,001.00 to $900,000.00
$5,456.75
$3546.89
$900,001.00 to $901,000.00
$5,461.75
$3550.14
$901,001.00 to $902,000.00
$5,466.75
$3553.39
$902,001.00 to $903,000.00
$5,471.75
$3556.64
$903,001.00 to $904,000.00
$5,476.75
$3559.89
$904,001.00 to $905,000.00
$5,481.75
$3563.14
$905,001.00 to $906,000.00
$5,486.75
$3566.39
$906,001.00 to $907,000.00
$5,491.75
$3569.64
$907,001.00 to $908,000.00
$5,496.75
$3572.89
$908,001.00 to $909,000.00
$5,501.75
$3576.14
$909,001.00 to $910,000.00
$5,506.75
$3579.39
$910,001.00 to $911,000.00
$5,511.75
$3582.64
$911,001.00 to $912,000.00
$5,516.75
$3585.89
$912,001.00 to $913,000.00
$5,521.75
$3589.14
$913,001.00 to $914,000.00
$5,526.75
$3592.39
$914,001.00 to $915,000.00
$5,531.75
$3595.64
$915,001.00 to $916,000.00
$5,536.75
$3598.89
$916,001.00 to $917,000.00
$5,541.75
$3602.14
$917,001.00 to $918,000.00
$5,546.75
$3605.39
$918,001.00 to $919,000.00
$5,551.75
$3608.64
$919,001.00 to $920,000.00
$5,556.75
$3611.89
$920,001.00 to $921,000.00
$5,561.75
$3615.14
$921,001.00 to $922,000.00
$5,566.75
$3618.39
$922,001.00 to $923,000.00
$5,571.75
$3621.64
$923,001.00 to $924,000.00
$5,576.75
$3624.89
$924,001.00 to $925,000.00
$5,581.75
$3628.14
$925,001.00 to $926,000.00
$5,586.75
$3631.39
$926,001.00 to $927,000.00
$5,591.75
$3634.64
$927,001.00 to $928,000.00
$5,596.75
$3637.89
$928,001.00 to $929,000.00
$5,601.75
$3641.14
$929,001.00 to $930,000.00
$5,606.75
$3644.39
$930,001.00 to $931,000.00
$5,611.75
$3647.64
page 46
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$931,001.00 to $932,000.00
$5,616.75
$3650.89
$932,001.00 to $933,000.00
$5,621.75
$3654.14
$933,001.00 to $934,000.00
$5,626.75
$3657.39
$934,001.00 to $935,000.00
$5,631.75
$3660.64
$935,001.00 to $936,000.00
$5,636.75
$3663.89
$936,001.00 to $937,000.00
$5,641.75
$3667.14
$937,001.00 to $938,000.00
$5,646.75
$3670.39
$938,001.00 to $939,000.00
$5,651.75
$3673.64
$939,001.00 to $940,000.00
$5,656.75
$3676.89
$940,001.00 to $941,000.00
$5,661.75
$3680.14
$941,001.00 to $942,000.00
$5,666.75
$3683.39
$942,001.00 to $943,000.00
$5,671.75
$3686.64
$943,001.00 to $944,000.00
$5,676.75
$3689.89
$944,001.00 to $945,000.00
$5,681.75
$3693.14
$945,001.00 to $946,000.00
$5,686.75
$3696.39
$946,001.00 to $947,000.00
$5,691.75
$3699.64
$947,001.00 to $948,000.00
$5,696.75
$3702.89
$948,001.00 to $949,000.00
$5,701.75
$3706.14
$949,001.00 to $950,000.00
$5,706.75
$3709.39
$950,001.00 to $951,000.00
$5,711.75
$3712.64
$951,001.00 to $952,000.00
$5,716.75
$3715.89
$952,001.00 to $953,000.00
$5,721.75
$3719.14
$953,001.00 to $954,000.00
$5,726.75
$3722.39
$954,001.00 to $955,000.00
$5,731.75
$3725.64
$955,001.00 to $956,000.00
$5,736.75
$3728.89
$956,001.00 to $957,000.00
$5,741.75
$3732.14
$957,001.00 to $958,000.00
$5,746.75
$3735.39
$958,001.00 to $959,000.00
$5,751.75
$3738.64
$959,001.00 to $960,000.00
$5,756.75
$3741.89
$960,001.00 to $961,000.00
$5,761.75
$3745.14
$961,001.00 to $962,000.00
$5,766.75
$3748.39
$962,001.00 to $963,000.00
$5,771.75
$3751.64
$963,001.00 to $964,000.00
$5,776.75
$3754.89
$964,001.00 to $965,000.00
$5,781.75
$3758.14
$965,001.00 to $966,000.00
$5,786.75
$3761.39
$966,001.00 to $967,000.00
$5,791.75
$3764.64
$967,001.00 to $968,000.00
$5,796.75
$3767.89
$968,001.00 to $969,000.00
$5,801.75
$3771.14
$969,001.00 to $970,000.00
$5,806.75
$3774.39
$970,001.00 to $971,000.00
$5,811.75
$3777.64
$971,001.00 to $972,000.00
$5,816.75
$3780.89
$972,001.00 to $973,000.00
$5,821.75
$3784.14
$973,001.00 to $974,000.00
$5,826.75
$3787.39
$974,001.00 to $975,000.00
$5,831.75
$3790.64
$975,001.00 to $976,000.00
$5,836.75
$3793.89
City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
$976,001.00 to $977,000.00
$5,841.75
$3797.14
$977,001.00 to $978,000.00
$5,846.75
$3800.39
$978,001.00 to $979,000.00
$5,851.75
$3803.64
$979,001.00 to $980,000.00
$5,856.75
$3806.89
$980,001.00 to $981,000.00
$5,861.75
$3810.14
$981,001.00 to $982,000.00
$5,866.75
$3813.39
$982,001.00 to $983,000.00
$5,871.75
$3816.64
$983,001.00 to $984,000.00
$5,876.75
$3819.89
$984,001.00 to $985,000.00
$5,881.75
$3823.14
$985,001.00 to $986,000.00
$5,886.75
$3826.39
$986,001.00 to $987,000.00
$5,891.75
$3829.64
$987,001.00 to $988,000.00
$5,896.75
$3832.89
$988,001.00 to $989,000.00
$5,901.75
$3836.14
$989,001.00 to $990,000.00
$5,906.75
$3839.39
$990,001.00 to $991,000.00
$5,911.75
$3842.64
$991,001.00 to $992,000.00
$5,916.75
$3845.89
$992,001.00 to $993,000.00
$5,921.75
$3849.14
$993,001.00 to $994,000.00
$5,926.75
$3852.39
$994,001.00 to $995,000.00
$5,931.75
$3855.64
$995,001.00 to $996,000.00
$5,936.75
$3858.89
$996,001.00 to $997,000.00
$5,941.75
$3862.14
$997,001.00 to $998,000.00
$5,946.75
$3865.39
$998,001.00 to $999,000.00
$5,951.75
$3868.64
$999,001.00 to $1,000,000.00
$5,956.75
$3871.89
$1,000,001 and greater: $5,956.75 for first
$1,000,000 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof
65% of
Building
Permit Fee
page 47
To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation
Valuation
Permit
Fees
Plan
Review
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 48
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 2017 Financial Items
BACKGROUND
There are 3 items that need to be reviewed by the council on an annual basis. Two of the items
have attached resolutions and the other item need to be authorized and reviewed by the council.
• Each year the city designates financial institutions that may be used as depositories for
city funds. The attached resolution lists those institutions that may be used in 2017.
• Minnesota statue 118A.03 requires that to the extent city funds in a financial institution
exceed FDIC insurance amounts, a collateral security be pledged to cover the difference.
The attached resolution states the collateral that is in place for the city at Deerwood Bank.
• The council needs to authorize the finance director to execute electronic payments and
prepay claims. This is not a change in process, but an acknowledgement that there are
claims paid prior to your approval on the agenda. This item was recommended to be
formally authorized by the city auditors.
BUDGET IMPACT
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve the attached resolutions
designating city depositories and accepting pledged securities. Staff recommends that the
finance director is given the authority to prepay claims. This action requires a majority vote of
the city council.
page 49
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017- 03
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2017 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Mendota Heights that the
following institutions be designated as depositories for city funds and securities for
2017:
Deerwood Bank
Wells Fargo Bank
Cherokee State Bank
Gateway Bank
U.S. Bancorp
Piper Jaffray & Co.
TCF National Bank
Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund
Wells Fargo Advisors, Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that investments of city funds be in any securities
authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapters 118A.04 and 427.02.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January,
2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 50
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017- 04
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR 2017
WHEREAS, every designated depository of city funds must provide collateral or
other security to the city to protect against financial loss, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 118A.03 and 427.01; and
WHEREAS, all financial institutions designated as depositories for 2017 are
members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) which provides suitable
security up to established limits; and
WHEREAS, the city's depositories in financial institutions routinely exceed these
established limits necessitating the provision of additional security.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following pledged securities be
accepted by the city as additional collateral for calendar year 2017.
American Bank
$450,000 FHLB 1.00%
$290,000 FHLB 1.00%
$200,000 US Treasury Note 0.875%
due 6/15/2018
due 6/15/2018
due 4/30/2017
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
'vow"'
nij
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 51
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone I 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
January 3, 2017
Mayor and City Council
Mark McNeill, City Administrator
City Commission Appointments
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to discuss the appointment of Advisory Boards and Commissions.
BACKGROUND
The following Commissioners are eligible for reappointment to their advisory commission, and
have indicated a willingness to be reappointed:
Planning Commission
Michael Noonan
Howard Roston
Airport Relations Commission
Jim Neuharth
Kevin Byrnes
Gina Norling
Parks and Recreation Commission
David Miller
(The election of Councilor Paper and Miller have created two vacancies on this commission
replacements to be determined following interviews)
RECOMMENDATION
The Commissioners to be reappointed to another term.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Council concurs, it should pass the following resolution:
Resolution No. 2017-09
A Resolution Appointing Advisory Commission Members
page 52
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017 -09
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights benefits from the active
participation of citizens in our advisory commissions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the excellent service provided by the following
commission members/representatives whose terms expire in January, 2017.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the following commissioners are reappointed to three-
year terms, starting February 2017 and expiring January 2020:
Jim Neuharth, Airport Relations Commission
Kevin Byrnes. Airport Relations Commission
Gina Norling, Airport Relations Commission
Howard Roston, Planning Commission
Michael Noonan, Planning Commission
David Miller, Parks and Recreation Commission
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mendota Heights City Council does hereby
appoint the following resident to the planning commission:
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 53
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution 2017-02 Final Payment and Acceptance of the City Hall Drainage
Work
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to approve the final payment and accept the work for the city hall drainage
improvements. The work included storm sewer installation, drain tile installation, grading and
waterproofing.
BACKGROUND
The work was substantially completed in November of 2016.
DISCUSSION
The contract work for the City Hall Drainage Improvement project has been completed,
inspected, approved and is ready for final payment (this will start on the one year guarantee
period).
BUDGET IMPACT
Total contract cost for this project is $66,800.00. Max Steininger, Inc. has submitted their final
payment for all of the completed work.
Final payment of this contract totals $66,800.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council approve the final payment and accept the project.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends that the city council pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 2017-02
"RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
CITY HALL DRAINAGE WORK".
page 54
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-02
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT
FOR CITY HALL DRAINAGE WORK
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota
Heights on October 25, 2016, with Max Steininger, Inc. of Eagan, Minnesota, has
satisfactorily completed the improvements for the city hall drainage work, in accordance
with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted
and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of
$66,800.00, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this third of January 2017.
ATTEST CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY BY
Lorri Smith, City Clerk Neil Garlock, Mayor
CITY OF
MEN DOT A HEIGHTS
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1651.452.8940 fax
www.menclota-heights.com
Request for City Council Action
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council, City Administrator
FROM: Kelly McCarthy, Acting Police Chief
SUBJECT: Authorization to Execute an Agreement with Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search
and Rescue Team (MN -TF1)
Introduction
The City Council is asked to approve an agreement with the Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and
Rescue Team.
Background
In 2003, the County and eleven cities signed a Joint Powers Agreement and formed the Dakota County
Domestic Preparedness Committee (DCDPC). The Committee assisted in the development of a Special
Operations Team (SOT) to respond to the unique rescue demands of a weapon of mass destruction
incident or a large-scale disaster. The SOT is comprised of employees from the County and all eleven
cities with members from fire, law enforcement, and emergency medical services. The SOT has
responded to incidents involving hazardous materials and technical rescues at locations throughout the
County.
In 2004, the Dakota County Special Operations Team was selected by the State of Minnesota Department
of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (MNHSEM) to be one of
five teams that would form the basis of the Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue (MN -
TF1) program. Participation in this statewide program was complimentary to the County Special
Operations Team as it provided additional funding for training and equipment, which allowed the team to
significantly enhance their response capabilities. Members of MN -TF 1 are trained in all aspects of
technical rescue, including rope rescue, confined space rescue, trench collapse rescue and structural
collapse rescue. In addition, they are trained in various search techniques, hazardous materials, and
advanced medical care.
On 7/3/2012, the City Council by resolution authorized the execution of an agreement to allow City
personnel to participate in the MN -TF 1 program. As the MN -TF 1 program continued to evolve, it was
recognized that the original Joint Powers Agreement signed in 2012 had several limitations that prevented
two of the original five teams from executing the agreement. Understanding the detrimental effects to the
MN -TF1 program if two of the teams were required to withdraw due to the current JPA language, a
workgroup was established to propose amendments to the JPA. The workgroup was successful in
crafting a new JPA that was acceptable to the legal counsel of all five teams. As a result of the
amendments, for City personnel to continue participation in this established program, the City Council
must approve Addendum A of the JPA, which is the Sponsoring Agency Agreement. Addendum A takes
the place of the City's previous participation in the Joint Powers Agreement for Minnesota Task Force
One. The updated JPA maintains a provision for the cities in Dakota County to collectively select a
representative for the MN TF -1 Board that was included in the original joint powers agreement.
There are two primary benefits to the City of continuing participation in MN -TF1. The first Cgs to
funding provided to MN -TF 1 by the State as outlined in the fiscal impact section below. The second is
liability protections provided through participation on MN -TF1 by the State of Minnesota. MN HSEM
has entered into a memorandum of understanding with MN -TF 1. The memorandum provides for liability
and workers' compensation coverage if members of MN -TF 1 are activated as a Specialized Emergency
Response Team under MN Stat. Sec. 12.351 during an emergency. Liabilities while responding as
members of the DCSOT remain as defined the DCDPC joint powers agreement.
Addendum A of the attached Joint Powers Agreement for Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and
Rescue Team is the Sponsoring Agency Agreement between MN -TF 1 and City. This agreement has been
reviewed and approved as to form by City legal counsel.
Budget Impact
The costs associated with the on-going support of personnel on MN -TF1 continue to be included in the
Police budget; there would be no expected changes to the budget due to this agreement. If the Council
would choose not to continue supporting City personnel on MN -TF1, the City would need to develop its
own response resources and work with the DCDPC for all of the incident types we are currently relying
on MN -TF1 to respond to, which would be an expensive endeavor.
MN -TF1 is wholly funded through grant funds. Participants and Sponsoring Agencies are not obligated
under this agreement to fund the MN -TF1 in any other fashion without an amendment to the agreement.
MN -TF1 historically received funding through the Homeland Security Grant Program through MN
HSEM. This funding was used for the initial establishment of the MN -TF1 teams and to support on-going
training and equipment needs. MN -TF 1 has worked with the State of Minnesota to establish a more
stable funding stream through the Minnesota Fire Safety Account. The Minnesota Board of Firefighter
Training and Education that administers the Minnesota Fire Safety Account has allocated $500,000
annually for the activities on MN -TF -1.
Recommendation
I recommend that the City Council approve continuing participation in the Urban Search and Rescue
team.
Action Required
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, approve:
Resolution 2017- 07
Sponsoring Agency Agreement between Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue
Team and the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
Resolution 2017-07
page 57
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPONSORING AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
MINNESOTA TASK FORCE ONE URBAN SEARCH
AND RESCUE TEAM AND CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights City Council supports efforts to be better prepared for any potential
disasters/emergencies within the City and in Dakota County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is a member of the Dakota County Domestic Preparedness
Committee joint powers entity that supports the Dakota County Special Operations Team, which
provides emergency response capabilities in the event of structural collapses and other technical rescues
in Dakota County and through an approval process to other neighboring communities: and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County Special Operations Team is one of five teams identified by the State of
Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
(MN HSEM) to host a structural collapse team to respond to structural collapses and other technical
rescues along with the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Edina and Rochester; and which is partially
supported financially by HSEM to develop an equipment cache and roster trained personnel able to
respond in the event of structural collapses and other technical rescues; and
WHEREAS, MN HSEM has required the formalization of the Minnesota Structural Collapse/Technical
Rescue MN -TF1 Organization (MN -TF1) joint powers entity in order to streamline funding, ensure better
coordination of training and equipment purchases, and to enable the State of Minnesota to designate the
members of the MN -TF1 as a Specialized Emergency Response Team under MN Stat. Sec. 12.351, so as
to provide liability and workers' compensation coverage during a State activation.
WHEREAS, on July 3rd, 2012 the City Council authorized the execution of an agreement with the
Minnesota Task Force One organization for the City of Mendota Heights' participation in the program; and
WHEREAS, the original agreement has been amended to allow the participation of the five charter teams
of the Minnesota Task Force One program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to retain City of Mendota Heights personnel on the Minnesota
Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue Team through a Sponsoring Agency Agreement with the
Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue Team, which replaces the City's previous
participation in the Joint Powers Agreement for Minnesota Task Force One.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota
does hereby approve the execution of the Sponsoring Agency Agreement by and between Minnesota Task
Force One Urban Search and Rescue Team, and the City of Mendota Heights.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ATTEST:
Neil Garlock, Mayor
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
cowl"'
nLii
DATE:
TO:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 58
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
January 3, 2017
Mayor, Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kelly McCarthy, Acting Police Chief
SUBJECT: Appointment of Representative to the Dakota County Domestic
Preparedness Committee (DCDPC) for 2017
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to appoint the Emergency Management Director/ Police Chief as the City's
representative to the Dakota County Domestic Preparedness Committee (DCDPC) for 2017.
BACKGROUND
In 2001 all Dakota County cities along with the County formed a county wide initiative of
planning and preparing for emergency response. The original committee was funded by a .25
cent per resident contribution. In 2003, the City Council authorized the membership in a county
wide Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the direction of seeking ways to improve emergency
cooperation across Dakota County.
The DCDPC has worked hard to secure grant funding to offset the start-up costs of the
programming. The committee is funded primarily through grant dollars and by a budgeted
contribution from each member city. In 2011, a long term capital budget was prepared and
approved by the Dakota County City/County Administrators group. The long term funding
begin appearing in the 2014 Mendota Heights Emergency Management budget.
The committee has implemented many programs all focused on the mission of better preparing
Dakota County for larger scale emergency response. The DCDPC JPA Board meets monthly,
and hosts a variety of training programs throughout the year, such as workshops for the City
Council, first line supervisor training, FEMA courses and an annual county wide emergency
response drill. In 2016, the DCDPC worked with all of the emergency managers in the county to
update the county -wide risk analysis and developed a mitigation strategy.
The DCDPC continues to leverage as many grant dollars as possible to start and maintain
programs/processes to keep our resident's safe.
BUDGET IMPACT
page 59
The City's budgeted amount for the DCDPC in 2017 is $4,000. Many of the costs associated
with the DCDPC are offset by grant money; it is anticipated that the City will receive at least
$25,000 in grant funded training, responses and equipment.
RECOMMENDATION
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, it should pass a motion authorizing the
City Administrator to notify the DCDPC Chair of the appointment of the Emergency Manager /
Police Chief as the City representative for 2017.
page 60
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
CITY OF
MENDDTA HEIGHTS
MEETINGDATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
Significant Claims
Request for City Council Action
January 3, 2017
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director
Claims List Summary
Mendota Heights Fire Relief Assoc. — 2016 City Contribution
Met Council Enivron Services — SAC & Sewer Service
Greg Wilson — PD Ethics Training
Airwatch — IT Service
Compass Materials — Road Salt
Great River Greening — Pilot Knob Restoration
Max Steininger — City Hall Drainage Work
Stantec Consulting Services — Planning Assistance/Street Project Work
Manual Checks Total
System Checks Total
Total for the list of claims for the January 3, 2017 city council meeting
$ 102,990.00
$ 101,785.06
$ 5,084.27
$ 2,640.00
$ 15,925.26
$ 10,050.00
$ 66,800.00
$ 25,533.28
$264,697.00
$176,213.61
$440,910.61
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heighs City Council approve the list of claims for January 3,
2017.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
MANUAL CHECKS
12129/16MAN
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
page 61
- 12/30/16 8:26 AM
Page 1
Search Name B C A - BTS
E 01-4490-070-70
BACKGROUND CHECKS - RINK Parks & Recreation $135.00
Search Name B C A - BTS $135.00
Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457
G 01-2072 12/16/16 PAYROLL $1,895.96
Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457 $1,895.96
Search Name INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
G 01-2073 12/16/16 PAYROLL $1,274.43
Search Name INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $1,274.43
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE RELIEF
E 06-4490-000-00 2016 ANNUAL CITY CONTRIBU Spec Fds $102,990.00
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE RELIEF $102,990.00
Search Name METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SVC
R 15-3615 NOVEMBER SAC
R 15-3320 NOVEMBER SAC
G 15-1215 JANUARY SEWER SERVICE
Search Name METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SVC
Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
G 01-2072 12/16/16 PAYROLL
Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
Search Name SW/WC SERVICE COOPERATIVES
G 01-1215 JAN 2017 HEALTH PREMIUM
Search Name SW/WC SERVICE COOPERATIVES
Search Name TRADEWIND PRODUCTS II
E 01-4490-109-09 COUNCIL RECOGNITION
Search Name TRADEWIND PRODUCTS II
Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL
G 01-2070 12/16/16 PAYROLL
Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL
Search Name WILSON, GREG
E 01-4400-020-20
Search Name WILSON, GREG
PD ETHICS TRAINING
-$49.70
$4,970.00
$101,864.76
$106,785.06
$50.00
$50.00
$37,251.00
$37,251.00
City Council $28932
$289.32
$54.00
$54.00
Police $5,084.27
$5,084.27
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
E 45-4212-046-45 UTILITIES Golf Course $34.73
E 45-4211-046-45 UTILITIES Golf Course $35.31
E 01-4211-320-70 UTILITIES Parks & Recreation $13.59
E 01-4211-310-50 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Road & Bridges $273.52
E 01-4211-300-50 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Road & Bridges $1,845.93
E 01-4211-420-50 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Road & Bridges $196.12
E 45-4211-047-45 UTILITIES Golf Course $88.03
E 01-4211-310-70 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Parks & Recreation $273.52
E 01-4211-320-70 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Parks & Recreation $222.86
E 08-4211-000-00 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Spec Fds $1,820.85
E 15-4211-310-60 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Utility Enterprise $273.52
E 15-4211-400-60 NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT Utility Enterprise $742.41
Account
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
MANUAL CHECKS
12/29/16MAN
Comments
DEPT Descr
Amount
page 62
12/30/16 8:26 AM
Page 2
E 28-4211-000-00
E 01-4212-310-50
E 01-4212-310-70
E 01-4212-315-30
E 01-4212-320-70
E 08-4212-000-00
E 15-4212-310-60
E 15-4212-400-60
E 01-4211-315-30
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTIL1TE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 GAS UTILITE
NOVEMBER 2016 ELECTRIC UT
Spec Fds
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
Fire
Parks & Recreation
Spec Fds
Utility Enterprise
Utility Enterprise
Fire
$1,407.76
$77.35
$77.35
$212.38
$50.53
$374.67
$77.33
$54.81
$735.39
$8,887.96
$264,697.00
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
Search Name AIRGAS USA, LLC.
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREETS $175.86
Search Name AIRGAS USA, LLC. $175.86
Search Name AIRWATCH
E 01-4301-114-14 IT SUBSCRIPTION Info Tech $2,640.00
page 63
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 1
Search Name AIRWATCH $2,640.00
Search Name ALERUS RE I IREMENT AND BENEFITS
G 01-2010 COBRA
Search Name ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS
Search Name AMBROSE, JOHN
G 01-2010
Search Name AMBROSE, JOHN
Search Name AMERIPRIDE SERVICES
G 15-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
Search Name AMERIPRIDE SERVICES
$5.00
$5.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT J. $91.80
MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE
UNIFORM & MAT SERVICE - P
UNIFORM & MAT SERVICE - P
MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE
$91.80
$19.55
$45.06
$51.14
$22.61
$138.36
Search Name APACHE GROUP
G 08-2010 SUPPLIES - CITY HALL $736.79
G 08-2010 SUPPLIES - CITY HALL $110.24
Search Name APACHE GROUP $847.03
Search Name ARROW BUICK & PONTIAC
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PARKS
Search Name ARROW BUICK & PONTIAC
Search Name AUTOZONE
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name AUTOZONE
Search Name B S N SPORTS
G 01-2010
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREET
OPERATING SUPPLIES - SHOP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREET
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREET
OPERATING SUPPLIES - SHOP
$34.56
$34.56
$37.99
$12.08
$28.38
$94.95
$142.06
$315.46
SOCCER GOALS $348.48
Search Name B S N SPORTS $348.48
Search Name BGMN, INC.
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
Search Name BGMN, INC.
Search Name BOLTON & MENK INC
G 29-2010
FUEL ADDITIVE
FUEL ADDITIVE
$402.44
$100.60
$503.04
STORM WATER UTILITY - MS4 $562.50
Search Name BOLTON & MENK INC $562.50
Search Name BURNSVILLE, CITY OF
G 01-2010
JPA ADMIN FEE $696.65
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Account Comments
DEPT Descr
Amount
page 64
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 2
Search Name BURNSVILLE, CITY OF
Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP
G 01-2010 12/20/16 CITY COUNCIL MINU
Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP
Search Name COMPASS MINERALS
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name COMPASS MINERALS
ROAD SALT
ROAD SALT
Search Name CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQ
G 15-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITY
Search Name CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQ
Search Name CRAWFORD DOOR
G 01-2010
Search Name CRAWFORD DOOR
BLDG MAINTENANCE - PW GAR
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMM
E 01-4490-110-10 2017 GUIDE
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMM
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC
G 05-2010
G 01-2010
G 05-2010
G 15-2010
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
NOVEMBER 2016 RADIO SUBS
OCTOBER 2016 RADIO SUBSCR
OCTOBER 2016 RADIO SUBSCR
NOVEMBER 2016 RADIO SUBS
NOVEMBER 2016 RADIO SUBS
OCTOBER 2016 RADIO SUBSCR
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC
Search Name DELTA DENTAL
E 15-4131-060-60
E 01-4131-110-10
G 01-2074
G 01-2071
E 05-4131-105-15
E 01-4131-070-70
E 01-4131-050-50
E 01-4131-020-20
E 08-4131-000-00
Search Name DELTA DENTAL
Search Name ELECTRIC PUMP, INC.
G 15-2010
Search Name ELECTRIC PUMP, INC.
Search Name ELECTRO WATCHMAN
E 15-4210-060-60
E 01-4210-050-50
E 01-4210-070-70
Search Name ELECTRO WATCHMAN
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
JANUARY 2017 DENTAL PREMI
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITY
1ST QTR 2017 ALARM SYSTEM
1ST QTR 2017 ALARM SYSTEM
1ST QTR 2017 ALARM SYSTEM
Search Name FISCHER S SERVICE - PLOWING
Administration
Utility Enterprise
Administration
Engineering Enterprise
Parks & Recreation
Road & Bridges
Police
Spec Fds
Utility Enterprise
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
$696.65
$78.75
$78.75
$11,147.28
$4,777.98
$15,925.26
$53.70
$53.70
$115.00
$115.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$69.99
$1,889.73
$69.99
$23.33
$1,889.73
$23.33
$3,966.10
$232.60
$160.90
$670.70
$975.00
$205.50
$321.80
$438.10
$956.30
$44.60
$4,005.50
$2,149.19
$2,149.19
$110.00
$110.00
$110.00
$330.00
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
page 65
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 3
G 01-2010 NOVEMBER 2016 PLOWING SE
$75.00
Search Name FISCHER S SERVICE - PLOWING $75.00
Search Name FLEETPRIDE
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
G 15-2010
G 15-2010
Search Name FLEETPRIDE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - FIRE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - FIRE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - S & W
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - S & W
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - S & W
Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A.
G 01-2010 NOVEMBER 2016 PROSECUTIO
Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A.
Search Name GREAT RIVER GREENING
G 01-2010 PILOT KNOB RESTORATION
Search Name GREAT RIVER GREENING
Search Name HAMLINE UNIVERSITY
E 01-4400-070-70 CLASSES - J. BOLAND
Search Name HAMLINE UNIVERSITY
Search Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
G 01-2010
G 08-2010
G 15-2010
G 08-2010
G 01-2010
G 08-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 08-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 08-2010
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PARKS
SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITIE
SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES - PARKS
CLEANING SUPPLIES - CITY HA
OPERATING SUPPLIES - STREE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - FIRE
SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
OPERATING SUPPLIES - SHOP
SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
$13.92
$17.98
$22.40
$73.05
$14.98
$3.72
$146.05
$5,891.00
$5,891.00
$10,050.00
$10,050.00
Parks & Recreation $1,500.00
$1,500.00
$135.88
$21.96
$110.51
$6.98
$75.95
$23.45
$99.00
$8.55
$8.97
$146.97
$21.97
$56.90
Search Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES $717.09
Search Name HOSE INC
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREET $52.62
Search Name HOSE INC $52.62
Search Name INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
SUPPLIES - FIRE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PD
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PD
SUPPLIES - PD
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PD
$61.34
$27.75
$33.28
$49.29
$49.58
Search Name INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $22L24
Search Name INTEGRA TELECOM
E 01-4210-070-70
G 01-2010
E 15-4210-060-60
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
DEC 2016 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
Parks & Recreation
Utility Enterprise
$28.18
$144.07
$168.98
Account
G 05-2010
E 01-4210-020-20
E 01-4210-110-10
E 01-4210-040-40
G 15-2010
E 01-4210-020-20
E 01-4210-110-10
G 01-2010
E 01-4210-050-50
Search Name INTEGRA TELECOM
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Comments
DEC 2016 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
DEC 2016 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
DEC 2016 TELEPHONE
JAN 2017 TELEPHONE
DEPT Descr
Search Name INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PARKS
Search Name INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM
Search Name INVER GROVE FORD
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name INVER GROVE FORD
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
Search Name KIRCHNER CONTRACTING
G 01-2010 SIGN INSTALLATION - PARKS
Search Name KIRCHNER CONTRACTING
Search Name LEL S
G 01-2075 JANUARY 2017 UNION DUES
Search Name LE LS
Search Name LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS, INC.
G 01-2010 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PD
Search Name LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS, INC.
Search Name LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
G 01-2010 OPEARTING SUPPLIES
G 15-2010 OPERATING SUPPLIES
Search Name LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Search Name LEAGUE MN CITIES
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
Search Name LEAGUE MN CITIES
TRAINING
SAFETY TRAINING
SAFETY TRAINING
Search Name LOCAL UNION NO. 70
G 01-2075 JANUARY 2017 UNION DUES
Search Name LOCAL UNION NO. 70
Search Name LOGIS
G 01-2010
Search Name LOGIS
Search Name LUBE -TECH
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
APPLICATION SUPPORT - PD &
OIL
OIL
Police
Administration
Code Enforcement/Inspe
Police
Administration
Road & Bridges
Amount
$114.49
$87.73
$114.50
$45.80
$168.97
$183.19
$228.99
$457.97
$28.18
page 66
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 4
$1,771.05
$100.95
$100.95
$637.68
$355.22
-$355.22
$637.68
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$637.00
$637.00
$116.27
$116.27
$34.15
$17.07
$51.22
$450.00
$1,050.00
$350.00
$1,850.00
$63.75
$63.75
$2,650.00
$2,650.00
$350.00
$87.50
Account
Search Name LUBE -TECH
Search Name MARTIN-MCALLISTER
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Comments DEPT Descr Amount
$437.50
G 01-2010 PERSONNEL EVALUATION $2,000.00
Search Name MARTIN-MCALLISTER $2,000.00
Search Name MAX STEININGER INC
G 24-2010
page 67
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 5
CITY HALL DRAINAGE WORK $66,800.00
Search Name MAX STEININGER INC $66,800.00
Search Name MENARDS
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
G 08-2010
G 45-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name MENARDS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
OPERATING SUPPLIES - UTILIT
SUPPLIES - CITY HALL
BLDG MAINTENANCE - PAR 3
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
$13.59
$29.52
$15.95
$33.94
$81.57
$85.89
$260A6
Search Name METRO AREA MGMT ASSOCIATION
E 01-4404-110-10 2017 MEMBERSHIP - M. MCNEI Administration $45.00
Search Name METRO AREA MGMT ASSOCIATION $45.00
Search Name METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SVC
G 29-2010 2016 CITIZEN ASSIST MONITO
Search Name METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SVC
Search Name METRO SALES
G 15-2010
$750.00
$750.00
PRINTER SERVICE $155.00
Search Name METRO SALES $155.00
Search Name MID NORTHERN SERVICES
G 01-2010 TRAFFIC LIGHT REPAIRS
Search Name MID NORTHERN SERVICES
Search Name MINNESOTA PUMP WORKS
G 15-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
Search Name MINNESOTA PUMP WORKS
Search Name MN GLOVE INC
G 01-2010
$210.00
$210.00
$1,935.00
$1,935.00
GLOVES - PARKS $87.85
Search Name MN GLOVE INC $87.85
Search Name MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN
E 01-4404-030-30 2017 MEMBERSHIP Fire $435.00
Search Name MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN $435.00
Search Name NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.
G 01-2071 JANUARY 2017 PREMIUM
Search Name NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.
Search Name NI1 I I SANITATION INC
G 45-2010 DECMEBER 2016 RECYCLING -
Search Name NI I If SANITATION INC
Search Name NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC
$48.00
$48.00
$19.96
$19.96
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
page 68
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 6
G 27-2010 MENDOTA ROAD 201507
$2,444.50
Search Name NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, INC $2,444.50
Search Name NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREETS $4336
Search Name NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT $43.36
Search Name OFFICE DEPOT
G 15-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE SUPPLIES - UTILITY $34.66
OFFICE SUPPLIES - STREET & $69.32
Search Name OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE
G 15-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITY
Search Name OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE
Search Name RITEWAY BUSINESS FORMS
G 01-2010
G 05-2010
G 45-2010
G 15-2010
W2 FORMS
W2 FORMS
W2 FORMS
W2 FORMS
$103.98
$137.79
$137.79
$143.91
$736
$21.03
$2.98
Search Name RITEWAY BUSINESS FORMS $175.28
Search Name ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD
G 01-2010
G 15-2010
G 15-2010
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREET
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITY
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - UTILITY
$25.18
$1,72939
-$150.00
Search Name ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD $1,604.57
Search Name SAFETY SIGNS
G 27-2010 MENDOTA ROAD PROJECT $850.00
Search Name SAFETY SIGNS $850.00
Search Name SAND CREEK GROUP
E 01-4137-110-10
2017 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE Administration $1,611.60
Search Name SAND CREEK GROUP $1,611.60
Search Name SNAP ON TOOLS
G 15-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name SNAP ON TOOLS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - SHOP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - SHOP
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - SHOP
Search Name STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 01-2010
G 27-2010
PLANNING ASSISTANCE
PLANNING ASSISTANCE
PLANNING ASSISTANCE
PLANNING ASSISTANCE
$57.00
$114.00
$57.90
$228.90
$2,962.44
$854.04
$2,782.31
$18,934.49
Search Name STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES $25,533.28
Search Name STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - STREET $70.00
Search Name STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC $70.00
Search Name STREICHERS
Account
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
01/03/17PAY
Comments
DEPT Descr
Amount
page 69
12/30/16 8:27 AM
Page 7
G 01-2010
Search Name STREICHERS
Search Name SUN LIFE
E 01-4131-020-20
E 01-4131-050-50
E 01-4131-070-70
E 05-4131-105-15
E 08-4131-000-00
E 15-4131-060-60
G 01-2071
G 01-2074
E 01-4131-110-10
Search Name SUN LIFE
Search Name TRI STATE BOBCAT
UNIFORMS - PETERSEN
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
JANUARY 2017 TERM LIFE & S
G 01-2010 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - STREETS
Search Name TRI STATE BOBCAT
Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH
G 01-2010 PRE-EMPLOYEMENT TESTS - A
Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH
Search Name TWIN CITY TELEPHONE
G 15-2010
G 01-2010
Search Name TWIN CITY TELEPHONE
Search Name U. S. BANK
G 01-2010
G 45-2010
G 01-2010
G 05-2010
G 05-2010
G 15-2010
Search Name U. S. BANK
Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE
E 01-4268-650-10
Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE
Search Name WALLGREN, SLOAN
G 01-2010
PHONE REPAIR - PW
PHONE REPAIR - PW
CONFERENCE - C. WILLSON
CONCESSIONS - PAR 3
EQUIPMENT - PD
SUPPLIES - ENGINEERING
SUPPLIES - ENGINEERING
SUPPLIES - SANITARY SEWER
2017 POSTAL PERMITS
Police
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
Engineering Enterprise
Spec Fds
Utility Enterprise
Administration
Administration
$92.99
$92.99
$750.05
$390.88
$278.82
$95.33
$90.01
$9622
$1,539.90
$37.13
$287.91
$3,566.25
$167.60
$167.60
$110.00
$110.00
$238.00
$476.00
$714.00
$50.00
$218.02
$299.99
$607.01
$87.46
$696.97
$1,959.45
$215.00
$215.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - S. $888.13
Search Name WALLGREN, SLOAN $888.13
$176,213.61
page 70
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution 2017-05 Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing
for the Kensington Neighborhood Improvements Project No. 201409
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Council approve the feasibility report and
schedule a public hearing for the Kensington Neighborhood Improvements.
BACKGROUND
The preparation of a feasibility report for the Kensington Neighborhood Improvements was
authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2016-80 at the City
Council meeting held on November 1, 2016. The proposed streets to be rehabilitated are Bedford
Court, Claremont Drive, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield
Drive. Based on our observations, as well as our pavement management system, these streets
have deteriorated to the point where it is no longer cost effective to patch the street and
rehabilitation is necessary. Staff has received several telephone inquiries as to when resurfacing
will take place and a letter of request from the Kensington Association management.
DISCUSSION
The feasibility report indicates the estimated costs for the project, along with preliminary
assessment estimates. At the end of the feasibility report, a project financing summary is
included to show project cost splits and funding sources are to be utilized. The total estimated
cost of the project is $1,254,620 including indirect costs.
BUDGET IMPACT
Street improvement projects are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.
Pursuant to the City's Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, the benefiting properties
should be assessed 50% of the street reconstruction and rehabilitation costs. The following tables
show the estimated unit assessments based on the City policy.
FUNDING SOURCES
ITEM
COST
ESTIMATE
ASSESSMENT
UTILITY
FUND
MUNICIPAL
BONDS
Street Rehabilitation —
Kensington
$1,254,620
$510,200
$44,420
$700,000
ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS - STREET REHABILITATION Saye i
Multi Family
Homes
Single Family
Homes
Assessable Costs
$919,350
$335,270
Assessment
$379,850
$144,660
Assessable Units/Lots
288
33
Estimated Unit/Lot Assessment per City Policy
$1,318.92
$4,383.64
Proposed Unit/Lot Assessment
$1,318.92
$3,950.00
The estimated unit assessments for the street rehabilitation are higher than the rates that staff
anticipates for future rehabilitation projects with pavement reclamation due to the anticipated
sub -grade correction. Staff proposes to assess the benefiting properties $3,950/unit in order to
bring the rate closer to previous rehabilitation projects.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council accept the feasibility report and schedule the public hearing for
February 7, 2017. A neighborhood informational meeting will be scheduled to be held on
January 18, 2017.
ACTION REQUIRED
If city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
#201409. This action requires a simple majority vote.
page 72
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017-05
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(PROJECT #201409)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2016-80, the City Council, on November 1, 2016, ordered a
feasibility report to be prepared by the Public Works Director with reference to the improvement of
Bedford Court, Claremont Drive, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield
Drive; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has submitted a report to the City Council with respect to
Bedford Court, Claremont Drive, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield
Drive improvements which include: removing the existing bituminous surface, aggregate base, concrete
curb and gutter repair, placing a new bituminous surface, existing catch basin repair, and appurtenant
work; and
WHEREAS, in said report the Public Works Director reported that the proposed improvements
and construction thereof are desirable and necessary, technically and economically feasible, cost
effective, and further reported on the estimated cost of the proposed improvements; and
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report as submitted.
2. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets and areas in accordance with the
report and the assessment of property as described in the report for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of
the improvements of $1,254,620.
3. A Public Hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 7th day of February,
2017 at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m.
Statutory notice and publication requirements shall be followed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this third day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 73
Kensington Neighborhood
Street Rehabilitation
Feasibility Report
Stantec
Prepared for:
City of Mendota Heights
Prepared by:
Chad G. Davison, P.E.
December 9, 2016
Stantec
page 74
Sign -off Sheet
This document entitled Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation was prepared by Stantec
Consulting Services Inc. ("Stantec") for the account of City of Mendota Heights (the "Client"). Any
reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec's
professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document
and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on
conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into
account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information
supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of
such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages
of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions
taken based on this document.
Prepared by g." 2i
(signature)
Chad G. Davison, P.E.
Revision
Description
Author
Quality Check
Independent Review
Draft
12/2/2016
CGD
12/6/2016
JGH
12/7/2016
LMM
page 75
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 AUTHORIZATION 1
1.3 SCOPE 1
1.4 LOCATION 1
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
2.1 STREETS 2
2.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 2
2.3 SANITARY SEWER 2
2.4 WATER MAIN 3
2.5 STORM SEWER 3
2.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES 3
2.7 PRIVATE ROADWAY 3
3.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4
3.1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION 4
3.2 SANITARY SEWER 4
3.3 WATER MAIN 4
3.4 STORM SEWER 4
3.5 PRIVATE UTILITIES 5
4.0 FEASIBILITY 5
5.0 PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING 6
5.1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 6
5.2 PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 6
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Costs 6
Table 2 Assessment Summary 7
Table 3 Funding Sources 7
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A A.1
APPENDIX B B.1
APPENDIX C C.1
5 Stantec
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
Executive Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
page 76
This project was previously presented in a report to the City Council in October of 2014 under
City Project Number 201409. This project will retain this same project number. The majority of the
scope of work has remained the same with the following highlighted changes:
• Claremont Drive improvements have been changed to full reconstruction.
• Preventative maintenance of the Bunker Hills Neighborhood has been removed from the
scope.
• Wilshire Court has been removed from the project.
• Whitfield Drive and Stockbridge Road (north of the park trail) have been added to the
project for pavement rehabilitation.
1.2 AUTHORIZATION
The feasibility report preparation for the Kensington neighborhood streets rehabilitation was
authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2016-80 at the City
Council meeting held on November 1, 2016.
1.3 SCOPE
This report reviews the feasibility of rehabilitating the following roadways within the Kensington
development on the south side of Mendota Heights Road, east of Dodd Road: Bedford Court,
Claremont Drive, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive.
Drainage was reviewed on Claremont Drive based on property owner informing the City of poor
drainage within the backyards of the homes on the southwest side of the street. Opinions of
probable costs are included in this report along with possible funding strategies for this project.
1.4 LOCATION
The improvements to Bedford Court, Claremont Drive, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive,
Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive are located in the southern half of Section 36, Township
28, Range 23. The proposed street rehabilitation area is shown in Appendix A.
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensington feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
1
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
Lr.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 STREETS
page 77
Concord Way and Lockwood Drive were constructed in 1980 under Project 87-15 as part of the
Kensington construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and streets. Bedford Court,
Claremont Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive were constructed in 1991 under Project
89-17. On Bedford Court, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive,
B618 concrete curb and gutters were installed and the roadway width measures 34 feet from
back of curb to back of curb. These streets have a pavement cross-section consisting of a 3 .5"
bituminous surface over a 6" aggregate base. Claremont Drive is constructed with surmountable
Design D curb and gutters and bituminous roadway width of 24 feet (back of curb to back of
curb is 28 feet). Claremont Drive has a pavement cross-section consisting of a 3" bituminous
surface over a 6" aggregate base. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main were also
constructed on these streets as part of Projects 87-15 and 89-17.
These streets currently have a deteriorated bituminous surface and are in relatively poor
condition. All of these streets appear to be near the end of their useful life and the cost to
maintain and repair the roadways is steadily increasing, so it is no longer cost effective to
continue to repair these streets.
Based on the extent of fatigue cracking, a rehabilitation of Bedford Court, Claremont Drive
Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive is recommended by the
pavement management system. Overlaying or seal coating the existing pavement is no longer
a feasible alternative.
2.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Proposed improvements to the Kensington Park Trail include placing concrete curb ramps with
truncated domes at the crosswalk on Stockbridge Road in compliance with ADA requirements.
2.3 SANITARY SEWER
The sanitary sewer located within the limits of the project site was cleaned and televised as part
of a City project in 2010, and then televised again in 2014. Overall, the pipes throughout the
proposed project site are in good condition with no visible instances of leaks in the pipes and
minimal or no leaking located near the manholes. This project does not include replacing any of
the existing sanitary sewer lines.
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensington feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
2
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
2.4 WATER MAIN
page 78
The existing water main in the Kensington Neighborhood is 8" ductile iron pipe and is currently in
good condition with no need for replacement.
2.5 STORM SEWER
All streets have existing storm sewer. The storm sewer pipe is currently in good condition with no
need for replacement.
Home owners on Claremont Drive have expressed concerns of poor drainage behind the
homes. A request has been made by the owners to extend the storm sewer to provide a catch
basin to connect into with a drain tile or small backyard drain.
2.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES
Privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present in the
neighborhood.
2.7 PRIVATE ROADWAY
There are three private roadways that are owned by three Kensington Neighborhood
Associations. No work is proposed for these private roadways at this time.
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensington feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
3
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
i.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
3.1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION
page 79
The rehabilitation of Bedford Court, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road, and
Whitfield Drive requires a 7 -ton street design per the City's Street Rehabilitation and
Reconstruction Policy. Damaged concrete curb and gutter along these streets will also be
replaced as part of the roadway restoration. Driveways that may be disturbed due to the street
rehabilitation will be replaced in kind. Disturbed boulevard areas will be restored with topsoil and
sod.
The existing right-of-way is 60 feet wide on Concord Way and Lockwood Drive, and 55 feet on
Bedford Court, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive. For Claremont Drive there is a 44 feet
wide easement agreement in place. No additional right-of-way or easements are anticipated
with this project.
Proposed improvements for Bedford Court, Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Stockbridge Road,
and Whitfield Drive will include the reclamation of the existing bituminous roadway and
placement of new bituminous base course and bituminous wear course over the reclaimed
pavement material. Using the reclaimed pavement material as a base provides a cost savings
versus importing a new aggregate base material. This method should rehabilitate the streets to
like new condition and extend the life of the pavement an additional 20-30 years assuming
continued preventative maintenance. See Appendix A for the rehabilitation typical section.
It is proposed to reconstruct the roadway of Claremont Drive. The existing pavement and curb
and gutter will be fully removed and replaced. The driveways will be saw cut and patched to
match the new curb and gutter. See Appendix A for the reconstruction typical section.
3.2 SANITARY SEWER
As indicated previously, the existing sanitary sewer is in satisfactory condition. This project does
not include replacing any of the existing sanitary sewer lines.
3.3 WATER MAIN
As indicated previously, the existing water main is in satisfactory condition. This project does not
include replacing any of the existing water main lines.
3.4 STORM SEWER
As indicated previously, the existing storm sewer is in satisfactory condition. This project does not
include replacing any of the existing storm sewer lines. Storm sewer will be extended along
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensingfon feasibility report draff_2016-11-29.docx
4
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
page 80
Claremont Drive and new storm sewer structure placed to help current drainage and open the
possibility for neighborhood drainage to tie into the system to solve current flooding issues.
3.5 PRIVATE UTILITIES
No utility companies have indicated they will be making improvements to their distribution
networks in conjunction with the City's proposed improvements.
4.0 FEASIBILITY
From an engineering standpoint, this project is necessary to maintain the roadways within the
City. This project is cost-effective based on current construction costs, feasible, and can be
accomplished as proposed.
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensingfon feasibility report draff_2016-11-29.docx
5
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
b.0 PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING
5.1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
page 81
The following costs were prepared based upon an Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs
(Appendix B) and are subject to change, depending on the final design of the project, soil
conditions, bids received, and actual work performed.
For assessment purposes, the project costs are separated into to two categories, single family
homes and multi -family homes.
Table 1 Project Costs
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation Cost Summary
Multi -Family Homes - Street Improvements
$919,350
Single Family Homes - Street Improvements
$335,270
Total Project Cost
$1,254,620
5.2 PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
The estimated total assessable amount for the project is based on special assessments for 50% of
the following costs: mobilization, traffic control, bituminous removal/reclamation, bituminous
base course, bituminous wear course, tack coat, valve and manhole adjustments, and
appurtenant work. City costs include curb and gutter replacement, sod restoration and
appurtenant work.
The estimated unit assessment for this project was determined by calculating the number of
assessable lots and dividing them into the total assessable project cost. The preliminary
assessment roll listing the assessable parcels is provided in Appendix C.
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensington feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
6
KENSINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD STREET REHABILITATION
December 9, 2016
Table 2 Assessment Summary
page 82
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation - Assessment
Summary
Multi Family
Homes
Single Family
Homes
Total Project Cost
$919,350
$335,270
Project Assessable Value
$379,850
$144,660
Total Assessable Units
288
33
Estimated Assessment Per Unit
$1,318.92
$4,383.64
Proposed Assessment Per Unit
$1,318.92
$3,950.00
The calculated assessment unit rate for the single family homes is greater than the predicted
benefit the homes will receive. This is due to larger lot sizes, corner lots, cul-de-sacs located in this
area. It is recommended the City considers a reduced assessment for these parcels. The
assessment per unit rate for the single family homes is proposed to be reduced to $3,950.
The following table summarizes the potential funding sources for this project
Table 3 Funding Sources
Total Estimated Project Cost
$1,254,620
Total Proposed Assessments
$510,200
City Storm Water Maintenance Fund
$44,420
Total Municipal Bonds
$700,000
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\kensington fr report\kensington feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
7
page 83
APPENDIX A/FIGURES
page 84
MENDOTA ['TIGHTS ROAD
-1
Proposed Improvements
City of Mendota Heights
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
FULL STREET RECONSTRUCT
RECLAIM AND REPAVE
100' 200'
FIGURE 1
Stantec
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
www.stantec.com
6mp'VL an6 j 21kt9L£O 66l\ 6mg
B618 CURB
& GUTTER
SPOT REPAIR OF
BROKEN CURB
page 85
17.00'
17.00'
—RECLAIM BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT, 10" DEPTH
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" AGGREGATE BASE
EXISTING TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
BEDFORD CT, CONCORD WAY, LOCKWOOD DR,
STOCKBRIDGE RD, AND WHITFIELD DR
n
17.00'
17.00'
n
z-1]
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
2.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" RECLAIMED BITUMINOUS AND AGGR. BASE
PROPOSED TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
BEDFORD CT, CONCORD WAY, LOCKWOOD DR,
STOCKBRIDGE RD, AND WHITFIELD DR
Typical Sections Not to Scale
City of Mendota Heights
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation
FIGURE: 2 ())Stantec
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
wwwstantec.com
D412
SURMOUNTABLE
CURB & GUTTER
B618 CURB
& GUTTER
14.00'
14.00'
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" AGGREGATE BASE
EXISTING TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
CLAREMONT DR
14.00'
14.00'
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
2.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" AGGREGATE BASE
PROPOSED TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
CLAREMONT DR
page 86
Typical Sections Not to Scale
City of Mendota Heights
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
FIGURE: 3
(�l Stantec
2335 Highway 36 W
51. Paul, MN 55113
www.stantec.com
page 87
APPENDIX B/OPINION OF PROBABLE
COST
page 88
Kensington Neighborhood
Street Rehabilitation
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs
December 7, 2016
Item
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Multi Family Homes - Street Improvements
Mobilization
LS
1
$35,000
$35,000
Traffic Control
LS
1
$5,000
$5,000
Reclaim Bituminous Pavement, 12" Depth
SY
12500
$5
$62,500
Adjust Storm Sewer Casting
EA
17
$500
$8,500
Adjust Sanitary Sewer Casting
EA
19
$500
$9,500
Replace Storm Sewer Casting
EA
2
$800
$1,600
Repair Storm Sewer Doghouse
EA
16
$200
$3,200
Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
LF
3540
$25
$88,500
Common Excavation
CY
2770
$10
$27,700
Subgrade Preparation
SY
15000
$2
$30,000
Subgrade Correction
CY
520
$10
$5,200
Granular Borrow
CY
1430
$18
$25,740
Aggregate Base, Class 5
TN
1370
$18
$24,660
Bituminous Base Course
TN
2490
$70
$174,300
Bituminous Wearing Course
TN
1500
$75
$112,500
Bituminous Driveway Patch
SF
5320
$6
$31,920
Concrete Driveway Patch
SF
600
$8
$4,800
Concrete Pedestrian Ramp
EA
2
$1,200
$2,400
Storm Sewer Improvements
LS
1
$15,000
$15,000
Turf Restoration
SY
1780
$6
$10,680
Traffic Marking, 12" Solid White Stripe
LF
225
$10
$2,250
Subtotal
$680,950
10% Contingency
$68,100
Multi Family Homes - Street Improvements
$170,300
Total
$919,350
Appendix B-1
page 89
Kensington Neighborhood
Street Rehabilitation
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs
December 7, 2016
Item
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Single Family Homes - Street Improvements
$1,254,620
Mobilization
LS
1
$15,000
$15,000
Traffic Control
LS
1
$3,000
$3,000
Reclaim Bituminous Pavement, 12" Depth
SY
6230
$5
$31,150
Adjust Storm Sewer Casting
EA
8
$500
$4,000
Adjust Sanitary Sewer Casting
EA
9
$500
$4,500
Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
LF
1050
$25
$26,250
Common Excavation
CY
700
$10
$7,000
Subgrade Preparation
SY
6230
$2
$12,460
Subgrade Excavation
CY
210
$10
$2,100
Aggregate Base, Class 5
TN
420
$18
$7,560
Bituminous Base Course
TN
1080
$70
$75,600
Bituminous Wearing Course
TN
650
$75
$48,750
Bituminous Driveway Patch
SF
500
$6
$3,000
Turf Restoration
SY
350
$6
$2,100
Traffic Marking, 12" Solid White Stripe
LF
130
$10
$1,300
Subtotal
$243,770
10% Contingency
$24,400
25% Indirect Costs
$67,100
Total
$335,270
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation Cost Summary
Multi Family Homes - Street Improvements
$919,350
Single Family Homes - Street Improvements
$335,270
Total Project Cost
$1,254,620
Appendix B-2
page 90
APPENDIX C/PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
ROLE
page 91
Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation
Preliminary Assessment Role
December 8, 2016
Single Family
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
Parcel ID
274160101120
ANTHONY F & JOAN M MARCHIO
2477 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2477 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 1
274160102110
BRIAN & MEREDITH CROSBY
2544 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2544 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
11 2
274160101010
CAROL & MICHAEL A SINDT
2455 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1717
2455 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
1 1
274160101130
DANIEL EDWARDS ROSTRATTER
2483 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2483 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
13 1
274160101070
DANIEL NOVAK & ANNE NOVAK
2527 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
2527 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
7 1
274160102120
DAVID G & ROSE E VIERLING
2550 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1716
2550 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 2
274160101090
DAVID V & GERALDINE MEYER
2498 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2498 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
9 1
274160101080
EUGENIO & ANGELA FUENTES
2565 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2565 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
8 1
274160101040
HERMAN F DEZOYSA
2491 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1717
2491 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
4 1
274160102050
JACK A & COURTNEY CARDWELL
2500 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2500 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
5 2
274160102060
JAMES G & NANCY M KEMP
12050 MATERA LN APT 202
BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135
2510 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
6 2
274160101170
JAYKAR & JAYSHRIBEN BHAKTA
2525 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2525 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
17 1
274160102080
JOHN B & DIANE B LEWIS
2526 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1716
2526 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
8 2
274160102040
JOHN L JR & CONNIE L MCCALLISTER
2488 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1715
2488 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
4 2
274160102130
JOSEPH D HENRY & JAMIE 1 HENRY
2554 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1716
2554 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
13 2
274160101140
KATHLEEN EILEEN TSTE PAN
2493 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2493 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
14 1
274160101050
MARK A & ANNE C MILLER
2503 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1718
2503 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
5 1
274160101020
MARK E & M COLLEEN TRACY
2467 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1717
2467 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
2 1
274160101060
MARK W & AMY J BOLAND
2515 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2515 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
6 1
274160101110
MICHAEL B & TOBY S MEIROVITZ
2480 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1713
2480 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
11 1
274160102070
MICHAEL F & MARGARET SEVENICH
2520 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1716
2520 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
7 2
274160102140
MICHAEL P & ELLEN M KENNEDY
2558 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2558 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
14 2
274160101160
PATRICK M EGAN & ANGELA M DZIK
2513 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1712
2513 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
16 1
274160101100
RICHARD C & MARY L FROEHLE
2488 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1713
2488 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
10 1
274160102030
ROBERT G MORRELL & KATHLEEN J LONEGRAN
2476 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2476 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
3 2
274160102010
ROGELIO & ROSARIO SALINAS
2450 WHITEFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2450 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
1 2
274160101150
ROY J & DONNAA DIEHL
2501 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2501 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
15 1
274160102020
SALVATORE L & KATHLEEN M LOPIANO
2462 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2462 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
2 2
274160102160
SCOTT A & CLAIRE 1 HAYES
2566 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2566 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
16 2
274160102150
SCOTT H & LISA M ELLISON
2562 WHITFIELD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1716
2562 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
15 2
274160102090
SCOTT T & KIMBERLY A HAMLIN
2532 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2532 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
9 2
274160101030
TODD A & MICHELLE C ROHRER
2479 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2479 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
3 1
274160102100
TRACY KACZROWSKI & MATTHEW HOLLIHAN
2538 WHITFIELD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1716
2538 WHITFIELD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
10 2
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160504680
ADRIAN D STETLER & MARY E MARTIN
2574 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2574 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104007
ALAIN ROBERT & BETHA LIMBO
2562 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2562 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504460
ALAN B STONE
13508 ORCHARD RD
MINNETONKA MN 55305-4045
2501 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104078
ALAN W & WENDI L MARSHALL
2590 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2590 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504620
ALBERT R & CATHERINE SPOTTKE
2497 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1746
2497 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504390
AMBER L PELTIER
7388 GRANADA ALCOVE S
COTTAGE GROVE MN 55016
2527 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004134
ANDREW BROWN
2532 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2532 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
134 4
274160104096
ANITA T JANDL
2579 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2579 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004098
ANN ACKERMAN
1 BROADWAY UNIT 311
TACOMA WA 98402
2593 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
98 4
274160004121
ANN E HANEBUTH
2521 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2521 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
121 4
274160104090
ANN K VOTEL
2589 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2589 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004118
ANN M GARVEY
2533 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1701
2533 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
118 4
274160104129
ANN M VANDERIET
2577 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2577 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104006
ANNE M NEMO
2550 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2550 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504250
ANNE MARIE THOMSON
2544 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2544 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
Appendix C - 1
page 92
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160104042
ANTHONY G YAZBECK
2567 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1710
2567 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004136
ANTHONY W PETERSON
2536 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2536 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
136 4
274160104076
ANTOINETTE MARIE CORRAL
2594 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2594 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104128
AOT PROPERTIES LLC
2486 PONDHAVEN CIR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2575 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504430
ARLENE C SCHATZ
2507 CLAREMONT DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1736
2507 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504650
ARNOLD 0 & BARBARA A HELGEMOE
2491 LOCKWOOD DR W
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2491 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104135
BAORONG LI
2214 EMERALD LN
SAINT PAUL MN 55102
2586 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004097
BARBARA E WING
2591 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1738
2591 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
97 4
274160104003
BARBARA L KLEINECK
2556 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2556 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104091
BEVERLY J KISCH
2587 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2587 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504640
BOBBI L HOPPMAN
2493 LOCKIWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2493 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004114
BONNIE L HOLLENBECK
2543 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1701
2543 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
114 4
274160104095
BOROTZ PROPERTIES LLC
6750 BRULE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
2577 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004009
BRADLEY R MARVY
2511 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2511 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
9 4
274160104073
BRIDGET A PEDERSON
2422 TREMONT PL UNIT 202
DENVER CO 80205
2582 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104074
BRIDGET C ZAPPA
2584 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2584 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004034
BRIDGET ELLEN GARVEY
2252 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2552 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
34 4
274160504100
BRUCE CARTER & DENISE DENARDI
2530 HAVERTON CIR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2488 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
2741 601 0401 9
CAROL A DORSA
2590 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2590 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004003
CAROL L BJORKLUND
2506 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2506 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
3 4
274160004039
CAROL L SHEPPARD
2564 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2564 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
39 4
274160104060
CAROLYN M ADAMS
2554 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2554 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504170
CATHERINE A & PATRICK D HARRISON
14213 DESERT FLOWER DR N
FOUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85268
2520 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004112
CATHERINE P MOORE
2567 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2567 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
112 4
274160104023
CATHRYN J DUFORT
2605 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1740
2605 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104014
CECILIA L YANGCO
2576 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2576 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104079
CEDRIC R & JANET E SCHRANKLER
2350 APACHE ST
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2588 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104083
CHAU KIM THI NGO
4728 XERXES AVE S
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410
2602 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104043
CHERYL L LEWIS
2565 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2565 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104107
CHRISTINE M PETERS
2567 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2567 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104121
CINDY M KEMPER
2551 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2551 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504060
CONSTANCE A TSTEE POWELL
2480 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1743
2480 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004008
COURTNEY A HOPPER
2527 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2527 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
8 4
274160004031
CRAIG J OLSON
2544 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1701
2544 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
31 4
274160004026
CYNTHIA R WIDMAN
2531 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2532 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
26 4
274160104016
DALY-GLEESON PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 287
NEW PORT MN 55055
2580 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004102
DANIEL A HALSEY & VIRGINIA A HALSEY
17766 LANGFORD BLVD
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
2583 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
102 4
274160104020
DANIEL A RODRIGUEZ
2588 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2588 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104067
DANIEL H FRANK & PETER A FRANK
13968 ERWIN CT
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
2570 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504590
DANIEL 0 ADAMS & SUSAN ADAMS
1145 TONKAWA RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356-9241
2481 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104092
DANIEL P MARVY
2585 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2585 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104111
DAVID A LEVY
2561 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2561 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004001
DAVID C FRIEDMAN
2502 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2502 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
1 4
274160504580
DAVID DUSCHANE
2483 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2483 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004010
DAVID L POLAREK
2513 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2513 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
10 4
274160104126
DAVID M MIKELSON
2568 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1703
2568 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104114
DEANNA M DUDLEY
2567 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118-1721
2567 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104022
DEBORAH A KROUPA
501 ROBERT CT
MAHTOMEDI MN 55115
2584 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504410
DEBORAH K GOLDBERGER
2523 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
2523 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104032
DELBERT STEWART & SANDRA WANNER
580 MICHIGAN ST
SAINT PAUL MN 55101
2589 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004106
DIANA FISHER
2573 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2573 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
106 4
274160104120
DIANE M LOATS
2553 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2553 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104040
DINA L & CHARLES H GOODMAN
2571 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2571 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104002
DOLORES A TROMBLEY
2558 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2558 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
2741 601 0401 8
DOMINICK & BETTY SOFIO
2592 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2592 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004030
DONALD & MARY KIETZMANN
2542 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2542 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
30 4
Appendix C - 2
page 93
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160004022
DONALD E & MARIE A MATHESON
2522 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2522 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
22 4
274160104112
DONALD GRAHAM C JR CLARK
2563 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2563 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004012
DOUGLAS H GREGG
2517 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2517 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
12 4
274160504420
DOUGLAS W & KIMBERLY KING
2509 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2509 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504370
EDWARD & CAROL KRIEGER
2586 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2586 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104080
EDWARD JOSEPH FLEURY
2586 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2586 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004115
ELAINE WAGNER
2545 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2545 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
115 4
274160004020
ELFI EHRLICH JANSSEN
2516 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2516 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
20 4
274160004126
ELIZABETH A CHRISTENSON
2513 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2513 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
126 4
274160104025
ELIZABETH A WITT
2601 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2601 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104045
ELIZABETH BURKE
2551 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2551 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104038
ELIZABETH M DRUCKER
2579 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2579 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104048
ELLERY MILNE
2557 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2557 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104024
EMILY WILHELMY
2603 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2603 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104046
ERIN R MARTINUCCI
2553 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2553 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504380
ERNEST S & MARTHA A GULNER
2529 CLAREMONT DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1726
2529 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504160
EZ LEASE AND LEND INC
PO BOX 75982
SAINT PAUL MN 55175
2510 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004029
FEIFAREK FAMILY TRUST
2540 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2540 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
29 4
274160104082
FIRAZER ANDARGE
2600 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1724
2600 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104138
FUNG K 01 & CHUCK H 01
2580 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2580 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504180
GEORGE W PEREZ
2522 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1726
2522 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004013
GHEORGHE AXINIA
2490 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2490 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
13 4
274160104052
GLENN R MURCH
2609 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1720
2609 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504530
GREGORY M & DIANE L LOTHENBACH
2473 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1743
2473 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104089
GWENDOLEN ANDERSON
2591 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2591 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
2741 601 0401 1
HANNA HABTEMARIAM
2570 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2570 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004127
HEATHER L POLSKI
2515 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2515 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
127 4
274160504490
HEIDI G & RONALD A BECK
356 EMERALD BAY CIR UNIT P-4
NAPLES FL 34110
2514 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504280
HOWARD J JR & PATRIC ABBOTT
2550 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2550 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104034
HOWARD N & JANE A GLEEMAN
2593 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2593 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504320
HUBERT PAUL PHILLIPPS
2539 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2539 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004032
INESSA P VIGDOROVICH
2546 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1701
2546 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
32 4
274160004002
JACQUELINE A BLISSENBACH
2504 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2504 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
2 4
274160504020
JACQUELINE 0 HUOT
2472 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1743
2472 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004004
JAMES & DIANE TSCHIDA, ANN TSCHIDA
2508 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2508 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
4 4
274160004111
JAMES D & PAUL W CHILD
2565 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2565 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
111 4
274160004033
JAMES R & BEVERLY M ADAMS
2550 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2550 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
33 4
274160004011
JAMES R LEE
2515 WISHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2515 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
11 4
274160004116
JANE 1 KASE
2547 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2547 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
116 4
274160004104
JANE P MITCHELL
2587 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1738
2587 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
104 4
274160504190
JANET A HAWN
2524 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2524 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104098
JANICE K SCHUETTE
2583 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2583 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504670
JANN CRONJE
2572 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2572 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104008
JANNETTE M PILACZYNSKI
2564 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1710
2564 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004035
JEAN M KOSOWSKI
2554 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2554 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
35 4
274160504140
JEAN WITSON
2506 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1736
2506 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104088
JENNA M HERZOG
8041 CHESSHIRE LN N
MAPLE GROVE MN 55311
2593 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004119
JEROME & SANDRA NEAVIN
1573 CHRISTENSEN AVE
WEST SAINT PAUL MN 55118
2535 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
119 4
274160004037
JESSE M DHEILLY
2560 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2560 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
37 4
274160104031
JOAN M HEINZ
2587 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2587 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004023
JOAN R LENNON
1062 CHIPPEWA AVE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
2524 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
23 4
274160104109
JOAN STRYKER
2563 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1667
2563 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004024
JOANN FROST
2526 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2526 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
24 4
274160504330
JOHN A & LILLIAN E LARSON
2537 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2537 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504220
JOHN M MAGNUSSON
2530 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1726
2530 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104137
JOHN MCLAUGHLIN
2582 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1703
2582 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
Appendix C - 3
page 94
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160004105
JOHN P KENNELLY
2571 HERITAGE DR UNIT 105
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2571 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
105 4
2741 601 0401 7
JON F FORSBERG
2582 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2582 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004130
JOSE S & PERLA P AGPOON
1835 PILGRIM PKWY
BROOKFIELD WI 53005
2522 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
130 4
274160504690
JOSEPH D & JEANNETTE M TSTE RITACCO
2576 CONCORD WAY
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1741
2576 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504110
JOSEPH J & PATRICIA KORMAN
2500 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2500 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504130
JOSEPH L & MAXINE L CASKINETTE
2504 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1736
2504 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004101
JOSEPH LEUMAN
2581 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2581 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
101 4
274160104001
JOSEPH P GRIFFIN
2560 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2560 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104061
JOSHUA A EHRREICH & JULIA SISTERMAN
2615 LIBERTY TRL
WOODBURY MN 55129
2552 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504400
JUDITH A ORCHARD
2525 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1726
2525 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504470
JUDITH A TURNER
2510 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1746
2510 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104134
JUDITH L MORGEL
2588 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1703
2588 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004100
JULIA M MCBRIDE-BIBBY
2597 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2597 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
100 4
274160104116
JULIE E SEGAL
2571 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2571 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104125
JUSTIN HENRY
29104 LESNAU CT
CHESTERFIELD MI 48047
2566 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004124
KARA A SHEEHAN
2527 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2527 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
124 4
274160104009
KAREN A ALTIER
2566 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2566 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104039
KAREN A RUBLE
2581 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2581 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004019
KAREN J ANDERSON
2514 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2514 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
19 4
274160004006
KAREN J BERGSTROM
2523 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2523 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
6 4
274160504010
KAROL H BAUMEISTER
2470 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2470 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004125
KATHERINE SCHWARTZ
2511 CONCORD WAY
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55120
2511 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
125 4
274160004016
KATHLEEN A CHEESEBROUGH
2496 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2496 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
16 4
274160004135
KATHLEEN A POPE
PO BOX 130923
SAINT PAUL MN 55113
2534 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
135 4
274160504040
KATHLEEN A QUITTER
4210 BRIDGEWOOD TER
VADNAIS HEIGHTS MN 55127
2476 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004132
KATHLEEN M JOHNSON
2526 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1702
2526 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
132 4
2741 601 041 02
KATHLEEN M TEEHAN
2589 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2589 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104115
KATHRYN A TSTE MCKEAG
2569 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2569 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104075
KATHRYN C WIDMAR
2596 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2596 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104072
KATHRYN L LICHTI
2580 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2580 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104004
KATIE M JANECEK
2554 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2554 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104071
KAYGREG HOLDINGS LLC
963 WAGON WHEEL TRL
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2578 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104136
KAYLAN BENTON
2584 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2584 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104099
KELLEY A KEIM
2595 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2595 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104101
KELLY M DANTER
2591 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2591 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504300
KRISTA J ISLEY
2543 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2543 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504560
KRISTI M TJADEN
2487 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2487 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104065
KRISTIN A ROSICKY
2566 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2566 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004107
KUNDAI MTUNGA
2575 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1667
2575 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
107 4
274160004110
LAUREL T BOERGER
2563 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1737
2563 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
110 4
274160504520
LAWRENCE & RIENALDA LUCIO
2475 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1743
2475 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104059
LEISHA R CAVALLARO
2556 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2556 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004099
LESLIE A MCCORMICK
2595 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1738
2595 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
99 4
274160104021
LINDA DAGRUD
2586 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2586 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004017
LINDA M STROMMER & TIMOTHY J MORRELL
2510 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2510 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
17 4
274160104030
LINDSAY A HOKENSON
1228 BROADMOOR DR
AUSTIN TX 78723
2585 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104132
LOI D TRUONG & HUONG VU
2583 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2583 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104005
LORI A HILLMAN
913 SAVANNAH DR N
SIOUX FALLS SD 57103
2552 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
2741 601 0401 2
LORI A VELASQUEZ
2572 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1710
2572 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504500
MARCUS JR & MARY N GRICE
2516 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1746
2516 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104106
MARGARET A PIEHOWSKI
7325 FREMSTED RD
DANBURY WI 54830
2569 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004027
MARGARET J SOSHNIK
2534 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2534 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
27 4
274160004122
MARGARET M SANCHEZ
2523 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2523 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
122 4
274160004014
MARIA ALEJANDRA HALL
2492 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2492 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
14 4
274160504340
MARIA BATTAINO
2580 CONCORD WAY
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1742
2580 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104035
MARIA CHERRY NAFSTAD
2573 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2573 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
Appendix C - 4
page 95
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160004018
MARILYN E CORNMAN
2512 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2512 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
18 4
274160004036
MARILYN J ROBINSON
PO BOX 398078
EDINA MN 55439
2556 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
36 4
274160004109
MARILYN K SIEMERS
2561 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2561 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
109 4
274160104057
MARILYN R EELLS
2560 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2560 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104108
MARJORIE A RODRIQUE
2565 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2565 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104062
MARTHA C RATHMANNER
2550 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2550 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104069
MARTINA BOCCI
2574 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2574 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004028
MARY A DELVECCHIO
2536 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2536 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
28 4
274160104026
MARY A THORSON
2599 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2599 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104086
MARY C DAUBNEY
2637 PARKVIEW DR
WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110
2608 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104066
MARY E MEREDITH
2568 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2568 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004025
MARY G & JAMES R DIETZ
7623 W STARRY NIGHT LN
TUCSON AZ 85743
2530 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
25 4
274160104105
MARY JO WINGATE
2571 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2571 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504090
MARY L TULLY
2486 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1745
2486 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504270
MARY M FULLER
2548 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2548 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104127
MARY SVENDSEN
2573 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2573 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004021
MARY T MAHER
2520 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2520 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
21 4
274160104054
MATHIAS J & MARY E SCHAEFER
2605 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1720
2605 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104085
MATTHEW R MCCARTY
2606 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1724
2606 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504570
MAUREEN D WINTZ HIGGINS
2485 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2485 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
2741 601 0401 3
MAUREEN E SCHULTE-WIRRER
2574 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2574 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004133
MAXINE STOVEN GROUT
2530 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1702
2530 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
133 4
274160004128
MAXINE WEST
2517 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1700
2517 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
128 4
274160104104
MICHAEL & MARY JOHNSON
1085 BWANA CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
2585 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104055
MICHAEL R NASSEFF
2603 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1720
2603 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504440
MICHAEL S & MARY KAT MAGNUSON
40 SUNNYSIDE LN
ST PAUL MN 55118
2505 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504030
MICHEL A PLEAU
5332 UPPER 147TH ST W
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124
2474 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504660
MICHELLE A MCMULLEN
2570 CONCORD WAY
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1741
2570 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004015
MOLLIE A OCONNOR
2494 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1706
2494 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
15 4
274160004129
MONICA L RAMSTAD
2520 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1702
2520 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
129 4
274160104063
NANCY M COMMERFORD
2562 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2562 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504450
NANCY P MOELLER
2503 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2503 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104044
NAOMI M MCNAMARA & JAMES L ALFORD
2563 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2563 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104029
NATHAN & ASHLEY GROVER
13071 GLENHURST CIR
SAVAGE MN 55378
2583 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504080
ORLAND G & M GLORIA RASMUSSEN
2484 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1745
2484 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104010
PATRICIA A KEYES
2568 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1710
2568 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104122
PATRICIA A ORME
2560 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2560 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104077
PATRICIA ANDERSON GALLWAS
5 APPLE ORCHARD CT
DELLWOOD MN 55110
2592 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104051
PATRICIA K PNEWSKI
2611 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1720
2611 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004040
PATRICIA M RABUSE
2566 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2566 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
40 4
274160104103
PATRICIA SAUNDERS
2587 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2587 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504630
PATRICK BENEDICT REV CLEARY
5908 BRADBURY CT
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55076
2495 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504210
PAUL KIRKWOOD SNYDER
1206 102ND ST W
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55077-4702
2528 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104036
PETER S FOLEY
2575 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2575 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104033
PHILIP E JR STEPHAN
2591 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2591 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004113
RALPH B KIRSHBAUM & FRANK 1 KIRSHBAUM
2541 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2541 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
113 4
274160104133
RAQUEL YONAMINE
2590 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2590 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104028
REBECA RODRIQUEZ WINGATE
2595 BEDFORD CT UNIT 28
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2595 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104124
RENATE R BEHRENDT
2564 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1703
2564 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504350
RENEE NEAL ELZIA
2582 CONCORD WAY
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1742
2582 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504610
RICHARD & CONSTANCE SUMMERS, ADRIANNE M GE
2499 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2499 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104070
RICHARD B MUELLER
2576 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2576 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004103
RICHARD E CARLSON
2585 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1738
2585 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
103 4
274160504600
RICHARD J JR WILLIAMS
2501 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2501 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104087
ROBERT GARY & MARCIA HENDRIX
2595 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2595 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104056
ROBERT L BLOOD
2601 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2601 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
Appendix C - 5
page 96
Multi Family
Parcel ID
Homes
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot and Block
274160104049
ROBERTA M BARGER
2559 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2559 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504120
ROCHELLE HOOD
2502 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2502 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504310
ROCHELLE M EMMEL
2541 STOCKBRIDGE RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1712
2541 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104068
RUTH A KEENAN
2572 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1705
2572 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104119
RYAN YUNGERBERG
2555 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2555 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504480
SALLY A COBENAIS
2512 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2512 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504290
SALLY Y REVOCABLE TR COHEN
2545 STOCKBRIDGE RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2545 STOCKBRIDGE RD
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104058
SANDRA J LARSEN
2558 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2558 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004123
SANDRA R AARON
2525 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2525 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
123 4
274160104084
SARA JO ANDERSON
PO BOX 420383
SAN DIEGO CA 92142
2604 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504230
SARA LYNN FRANK
2540 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2540 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504150
SCOTT FLAHERTY
2508 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2508 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104050
SHANNON M MCGUIRE
2561 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1709
2561 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104027
SHARON J MURPHY
2597 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1739
2597 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004005
SHEELAGH FROST RUSSELL
2521 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2521 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
5 4
274160104118
SHEILA POWERS
2557 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2557 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504510
SHERYL A HELGEMOE
2477 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1743
2477 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160004038
SIMON J III & SUSAN BLATTNER
1341 GREENWILLOW LN UNIT G
GLENVIEW IL 60025
2562 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
38 4
274160004131
STEVE & SUSAN GRANER
2524 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
2524 BROOKFIELD LN
KENSINGTON PUD
131 4
274160104093
STEVEN J & LISA M SEPPELT
4814 143RD ST W
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124
2573 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504260
STEVEN M BRIELMAIER
2546 CLAREMONT DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2546 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104131
STEVEN R KOHLER
2581 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2581 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104123
STEVEN W RUBENSTEIN
2562 HERITAGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1703
2562 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004120
SUNNY ANDRIY CHEN
2537 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2537 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
120 4
274160104064
SUSAN K KLESSIG
2564 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1704
2564 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504070
SUSAN L GABEL
2482 LOCKWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1743
2482 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504550
SUSAN TEMPLE
2489 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2489 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504200
SYLVIA JEAN COOK
2526 CLAREMONT DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1726
2526 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160504360
TERRY PROPERTIES LLC
11 HILLTOP LN
SAINT PAUL MN 55116
2584 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104100
THERESA M BOCK
2593 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1721
2593 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504050
THOMAS C & KATHRYN H KIDD
2478 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1743
2478 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274846000020
THOMAS G & BETTY J RAFFIN
2542 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1702
2542 BROOKFIELD LN
MENDOTA WOODS
B
274160504240
THOMAS J & ELLEN M ENGQUIST
2542 CLAREMONT DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1725
2542 CLAREMONT DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104110
THOMAS J & KRISTIN J PETRIE
2561 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2561 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160504540
THOMAS J SR TSTEE SPANIOL
2471 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2471 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 6TH ADD
6 3
274160104047
THOMAS M & BRENDA S LARDY
20911 ILLINOIS PATH
LAKEVILLE MN 55044
2555 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104097
THOMAS NOREE
2581 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2581 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004007
THOMAS P & MARIAN M NIEMIEC
2525 WILSHIRE CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2525 WILSHIRE CT
KENSINGTON PUD
7 4
274160104053
TIMOTHY M BOLAND
2607 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1720
2607 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104113
TOBY MARKUS
2565 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2565 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
2741 601 0401 5
TODD D ROSSE
2578 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1708
2578 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104094
TRACY & DUSTIN M TRUESDELL
2575 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2575 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160004108
US BANK TRUST NA & CALIBER HOME LOANS INC
2710 HASKELL AVE N STE 2150
DALLAS TX 75204-2912
2577 HERITAGE DR
KENSINGTON PUD
108 4
274160004117
VICKI L LARSON
2531 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1701
2531 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD
117 4
274160104037
WAYNE T SCHULLER & MARY E VANDERLIN
2577 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2577 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104041
WILLIAM A III CUMMING
2569 BEDFORD CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2569 BEDFORD CT
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104081
WILLIAM J LYNCH
2598 LOCKWOOD DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1722
2598 LOCKWOOD DR
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104117
WINIFRED K SIMONS
2559 CONCORD WAY
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120-1728
2559 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
274160104130
YUPING ZHENG
2484 BRIDGEVIEW CT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2579 CONCORD WAY
KENSINGTON PUD 2ND ADD
12 3
Appendix C - 6
page 97
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution 2017-06 Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing
for the Mendota Heights Road Improvements Project No. 201616
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Council approve the feasibility report and
schedule a public hearing for the Mendota Heights Road Improvements.
BACKGROUND
The preparation of a feasibility report for the Mendota Heights Road Improvements was
authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2016-79 at the City
Council meeting held on November 1, 2016. The proposed streets to be rehabilitated are
Mendota Heights Road (from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road) and Condon Court. Based on
our observations, as well as our pavement management system, these streets have deteriorated to
the point where it is no longer cost effective to patch the street and rehabilitation is necessary.
This project also proposes to extend a sanitary sewer from Lake Drive to Condon Court.
DISCUSSION
The feasibility report indicates the estimated costs for the project, along with preliminary
assessment estimates. At the end of the feasibility report, a project financing summary is
included to show project cost splits and funding sources are to be utilized. The total estimated
cost of the project is $1,752,585 including indirect costs.
BUDGET IMPACT
Street improvement projects are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.
Pursuant to the City's Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, the benefiting properties
should be assessed 50% of the street reconstruction and rehabilitation costs. The following tables
show the estimated unit assessments based on the City policy.
FUNDING SOURCES
ITEM
COST
ESTIMATE
ASSESSMENT
UTILITY
FUND
MUNICIPAL
BONDS
MUNICIPAL
STATE AID
Street Rehabilitation —
Mendota Heights Road
$1,752,585
$892,418
$46,200
$513,967
$300,000
ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS - STREET REHABILITATION Mage U0
Mendota
Heights Rd
Condon Court
(Street)
Condon Court
(Sanitary)
Project Costs
$1,348,630
$335,270
Assessment
$585,778.50
$58,011.25
$282,940.63
Assessable Units/Lots
5727 (FT)
6
6
Estimated Unit/Lot Assessment
per City Policy
$102.28/FT
$9,668.54
$47,156.77
Proposed Unit/Lot Assessment
$102.28/FT
$3,950.00
$47,156.77
The estimated unit assessments for the street rehabilitation are higher than the rates that staff
anticipates for future rehabilitation projects with pavement reclamation. Staff proposes to assess
the benefiting properties, on Condon Court, $3,950/unit in order to bring the rate closer to
previous rehabilitation projects.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council accept the feasibility report and schedule the public hearing for
February 7, 2017.
ACTION REQUIRED
If city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
#201616. This action requires a simple majority vote.
page 99
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017-06
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(PROJECT #201616)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2016-79, the City Council, on November 1, 2016, ordered a
feasibility report to be prepared by the Public Works Director with reference to the improvement of
Mendota Heights Road and Condon Court; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has submitted a report to the City Council with respect to
Mendota Heights Road and Condon Court improvements which include: removing the existing
bituminous surface, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter repair, placing a new bituminous surface,
existing catch basin repair, Sanitary sewer construction, and appurtenant work; and
WHEREAS, in said report the Public Works Director reported that the proposed improvements
and construction thereof are desirable and necessary, technically and economically feasible, cost
effective, and further reported on the estimated cost of the proposed improvements; and
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the Feasibility Report as submitted.
2. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets and areas in accordance with the
report and the assessment of property as described in the report for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of
the improvements of $1,752,585.
3. A Public Hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 7th day of February,
2017 at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m.
Statutory notice and publication requirements shall be followed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this third day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 100
Mendota Heights Road Street
Rehabilitation
Feasibility Report
Stantec
Prepared for:
City of Mendota Heights
Prepared by:
Chad G. Davison, P.E.
December 7, 2016
Stantec
page 101
Sign -off Sheet
This document entitled Mendota Heights Road Street Rehabilitation was prepared by Stantec
Consulting Services Inc. ("Stantec") for the account of City of Mendota Heights (the "Client"). Any
reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec's
professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document
and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on
conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into
account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information
supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of
such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages
of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions
taken based on this document.
Prepared by gel •:J.
(signature)
Chad G. Davison, P.E.
Revision
Description
Author
Quality Check
Independent Review
Draft
12/6/2016
CGD
12/7/2016
JGH
12/8/2016
LMM
page 102
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 AUTHORIZATION 1
1.2 SCOPE 1
1.3 LOCATION 1
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
2.1 STREETS 2
2.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 2
2.3 SANITARY SEWER 2
2.4 WATER MAIN 3
2.5 STORM SEWER 3
2.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES 3
3.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4
3.1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION 4
3.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 4
3.3 SANITARY SEWER 4
3.4 WATER MAIN 5
3.5 STORM SEWER 5
3.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES 5
4.0 FEASIBILITY 5
5.0 PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING 6
5.1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 6
5.2 PROPOSED MUNICIPAL STATE AID REIMBURSEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 6
5.2.1 Municipal State Aid 6
5.2.2 Roadway Assessment 6
5.2.3 Sanitary Sewer Assessment 7
5.2.4 Project Funding Summary 7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Costs 6
Table 2 Assessment Summary 7
Table 3 Funding Summary 7
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A A.1
APPENDIX B B.1
APPENDIX C B.1
JLa ntec
page 103
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
Executive Summary
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 AUTHORIZATION
The feasibility report preparation for the street rehabilitation of Mendota Heights Road and
Condon Court was authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution
2016-79 at the City Council meeting held on November 1, 2016.
1.2 SCOPE
This report reviews the feasibility of rehabilitating the roadways of Mendota Heights Road, west
of Dodd Road and east of the Interstate 35E overpass and Condon Court, along with the
extension of sanitary sewer within the roadway of Mendota Heights Road at Lake Drive to the
north end of Condon Court. Opinions of probable costs are included in this report along with
possible funding strategies for this project.
1.3 LOCATION
The above mentioned improvements are located in the southern half of Section 36, Township 28,
Range 23. The proposed improvements are shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A.
® Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
1
page 104
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 STREETS
The Condon Court roadway was installed with the state of Minnesota project for Interstate 494
under project number 1985-76. The street has 5.5" of bituminous paved on 1 foot of compacted
subgrade. The street has 6" tall barrier Concrete curb and gutters on both sides of the road
designed at 32' from face to face.
Mendota Heights road was last improved in 1991. This project widened the roadway to 52' from
face of curb to face of curb. This roadway has 6" barrier curb on both sides of the road. The
pavement section generally consists of 5" of bituminous over 8" of aggregate base and 12" of
granular borrow.
A roundabout was added at the intersection of Visitation Dr in 2009. The proposed project will
not impact the new roundabout.
These streets currently have a failing bituminous surface and are in relatively poor condition. All
of these streets appear to be near the end of their useful life and the cost to maintain and repair
the roadways is steadily increasing, so it is no longer cost effective to continue to repair these
streets.
Based on the extent of fatigue cracking, a rehabilitation of Mendota Heights Road and Condon
Court is recommended by the pavement management system. Overlaying or seal coating the
existing pavement is no longer a feasible alternative.
2.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
The existing bituminous trail on the north side of Mendota Heights Road has contraction cracking
approximately every 30 feet. The pavement surface has lost the majority of the asphalt material.
2.3 SANITARY SEWER
A sanitary sewer is located on the south side of Mendota Heights Rd, 160' west of the
intersection of Lake Dr. (north of the St. Thomas Ice Arena). This sewer is located 12' south of the
right of way on private property. The City has a 30' easement from St Thomas Academy for this
sanitary sewer. The pipe flows west approximately 670' and crosses Mendota Heights Rd to the
lift station next to the bituminous trail on the north side of the roadway. No maintenance to the
existing system is proposed with this project.
® Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
2
page 105
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
2.4 WATER MAIN
The existing water main through the project limits starts as a 16" ductile iron pipe at Dodd Road.
This pipe increases to a 24" ductile iron pipe just west of the roundabout at Visitation Drive. The
pipes are in good condition and have no need for replacement.
2.5 STORM SEWER
All streets have existing storm sewer. The storm sewer pipe is currently in good condition with no
need for replacement. One of the catch basins on the north side of Mendota Heights Road near
the sanitary lift station has structural damage and needs replacement. Field inspection of all the
storm sewer catch basins and manholes within the project limits was performed. Five defective
castings and 16 pipe doghouses with deteriorated mortar were observed.
2.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES
Privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present within
the project.
Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
3
page 106
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
3.0 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
3.1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION
The rehabilitation of Condon Court requires a 7 -ton street design per the City's Street
Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy. It is proposed to reclaim the existing bituminous and
pave over the reclaimed pavement material. Any damaged concrete curb and gutter on this
street will also be replaced as part of the roadway restoration. Driveways that may be disturbed
due to the street rehabilitation will be replaced in kind. Disturbed boulevard areas will be
restored with topsoil and sod. See appendix A for the typical sections.
Mendota Heights Road is a Municipal State Aid (MSA) designated route. The MSA design
standards require a 9 -ton pavement section to qualify for State Aid funding. It is proposed to
remove and replace the full pavement section in the area of sanitary sewer trench installation.
The roadway between the Interstate 35E bridge and 160' west of Lake Dr. will be reclaimed and
repaved with bituminous. The section of Mendota Heights Rd between Dodd Rd and the
Visitation Ave roundabout is recommended for mill and overlay. The top 2" of bituminous will be
milled off and replaced.
The existing right-of-way of Condon Court varies in width due to its proximity to the Dodd Road
right-of-way. The curb and pavement section of Condon Ct. is located entirely within the right-
of-way. Mendota Heights Rd. right-of-way width varies between 80 and 120 feet. No additional
right-of-way or easements are anticipated for the road improvements of this project.
By using the reclaimed pavement material as a base there is a cost savings versus importing a
new aggregate base material. This method should rehabilitate the streets to like new condition
and extend the life of the pavement an additional 20-30 years assuming continued preventative
maintenance. See Appendix A for the rehabilitation typical sections.
3.2 PARK IMPROVEMENTS
The bituminous trail on the north side of Mendota Heights Rd. is proposed to be milled and
overlaid from the west driveway of the Peterson property to the west side of the roundabout at
Visitation Dr. Concrete pedestrian ramps with truncated dome panels will be added at Lake Dr.
to comply with ADA standards.
3.3 SANITARY SEWER
Sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended from the dead end manhole at the north east corner
of the St. Thomas Academy Ice Arena parcel, to the north west corner of the northern most
proposed lot on Condon Ct. The new pipe is proposed to be installed by open cut from the
existing manhole to the west side of the roundabout. The remaining 510' of sewer is proposed to
® Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
4
page 107
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
be directional drilled to prevent disruption of the recently constructed roundabout at the
intersection of Mendota Heights Rd and Visitation Dr.
Permanent and temporary easements are required on the northern most parcel of the proposed
2522 & 2525 Condon Court development to install the sanitary sewer manhole designed to serve
the parcels on Condon Ct. These easements should be addressed in the platting of this
development.
Highway 110 will be under construction at the same time as this proposed project. Local traffic
may be detoured to Mendota Heights Rd during this construction. It is proposed to specify a
restricted trench during the connection to existing manhole and the installation of sanitary west
of Lake Dr. This will allow one lane of traffic to pass by the utility trench on the north side of
Mendota Heights Rd.
As indicated previously, the existing sanitary sewer is in satisfactory condition. This project does
not include replacing any of the existing sanitary sewer lines.
3.4 WATER MAIN
As indicated previously, the existing water main is in satisfactory condition. This project does not
include replacing any of the existing water main lines.
3.5 STORM SEWER
As indicated previously, the existing storm sewer is in satisfactory condition. This project does not
include replacing any of the existing storm sewer lines for maintenance purposes. Some storm
sewer will need to be salvaged and reinstalled do to conflict with the sanitary sewer installation.
3.6 PRIVATE UTILITIES
No utility companies have indicated they will be making improvements to their distribution
networks in conjunction with our proposed improvements.
t.0 FEASIBILITY
From an engineering standpoint, this project is necessary to maintain the roadways for public
use. This project is cost-effective, feasible, and can be accomplished as proposed.
Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx 5
page 108
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
b.0 PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING
5.1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
The following costs were prepared based upon an Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs
(Appendix B) and are subject to change, depending on the final design of the project, soil
conditions, bids received, and actual work performed.
For assessment purposes, the project costs are separated into two categories, Mendota Heights
Road Improvements and Condon Ct Improvements.
Table 1 Project Costs
Cost Summary
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Participating
$1,288,330
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Non -Participating
$60,300
Condon Court - MSA Non -Participating
$403,955
Total Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation Project Cost
$1,752,585
5.2 PROPOSED MUNICIPAL STATE AID REIMBURSEMENT AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
5.2.1 Municipal State Aid
Mendota Heights Road is a city designated State Aid route. The estimated cost of state aid
eligible improvements and proposed withdrawal from the City account are listed in Table 3
below.
5.2.2 Roadway Assessment
The estimated assessable amount for the roadway rehabilitation is based on specially assessing
50% of the following costs: mobilization, traffic control, bituminous removal/reclamation,
bituminous base course, bituminous wear course, tack coat, valve and manhole adjustments,
and appurtenant work. City costs include curb and gutter replacement, sod restoration and
appurtenant work.
The roadway improvements on Mendota Heights Road are proposed to be assessed to the
benefitting properties based on a lot front footage basis. The rehabilitation of Condon Court
pavement is proposed to be assessed on a per lot basis. The two parcels associated with the
2511 & 2525 Condon Court development each have 2.5 Residential Lot Equivalents (RLE) to
account for the five lots proposed across these two parcels.
® Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
6
page 109
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD STREET REHABILITATION
December 7, 2016
5.2.3 Sanitary Sewer Assessment
It is proposed to assess 100% of the costs to extend the sanitary sewer service to Condon Court.
This cost is proposed to be split evenly between the benefitting properties at RLE rate.
The preliminary assessment role is provided in Appendix C. The assessable project cost and
proposed assessments are summarized in the table below.
Table 2 Assessment Summary
Mendota Heights Road Street
Rehabilitation -
Mendota
Heights Rd
Assessment Summary
Condon Court
(Street)
Condon Court
(Sanitary)
Total Project Cost
$1,348,630.00
$403,955.00
Project Assessable Value
$585,778.50
$58,011.25
$282,940.63
Total Assessable Units
5727
6
6
Estimated Assessment Per Unit
$102.28
$9,668.54
$47,156.77
Proposed Assessment Per Unit
$102.28
$3,950.00
$47,156.77
The calculated street assessment unit rate for the single family homes on Condon Court is
greater than the predicted benefit the homes will receive. This is due to larger lot sizes and
having homes only on the west side of the road. It is recommended the City considers a
reduced street assessment for these parcels. The assessment per unit rate for the single family
homes is proposed to be reduced to $3,950.
5.2.4 Project Funding Summar
The following table is a summary of recommended funding sources for the project. It is proposed
to assess a portion of this project through special assessments. A minor portion of the project can
be funded by the City's storm water maintenance fund. It is also possible to receive state aid
reimbursement for a portion of the City's costs through the Mendota Heights MSA account. The
remaining balance is proposed to be funded through municipal bonds.
Table 3 Funding Summary
Mendota Heights Road Project Funding Summary
Total Estimated Project Cost
$1,752,585
Total Proposed Assessments
$892,418
City Storm Water Maintenance Fund
$46,200
Total Proposed Municipal State Aid Withdrawal
$300,000
Total Municipal Bonds
$513,967
® Stantec
cgd v:\1938\active\193803763\reports\feasibility\mendota heights rd fr report\mendota heights rd feasibility report draft_2016-11-29.docx
7
page 110
APPENDIX A/FIGURES
•a•e 111
4
414
;. f: sem:
_' •1 ., - R n;..,.
EXTEND
BITUMINOUS
TRATE,_
rotEKDOTA HEIGHTS RdA
ADJ UST I"
CASTING,
TYP.
(Lk\
•
•ii; t•, •
INTERSTATE 494
I
1,1
• as
LEGEND
MILL AND OVERLAY
FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
RECLAIM AND REPAVE
OPEN CUT SANITARY SEWER
DIRECTIONAL DRILL SANITARY SEWER
Proposed Improvements
City of Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights Road Street Rehabilitation
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
FIGURE 1
200' 400'
Stantec
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
www.stantec.com
16.00' ►
16.00' II
page 112
B618 CURB —RECLAIM BITUMINOUS
& GUTTER
PAVEMENT, 10" DEPTH
SPOT REPAIR OF
BROKEN CURB
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
4" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
12" COMPACTION SUBCUT
EXISTING TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
CONDON CT
16.00'
16.00'
n
—1.5" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
2.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
6" RECLAIMED BITUMINOUS AND SUBGRADE SOIL
PROPOSED TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
CONDON CT
Typical Sections Not to Scale
City of Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights Road Street Rehabilitation
FIGURE: 2 Stantec
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
wwwstantec.com
B618 CURB
& GUTTER
n
L r
26.00'
26.00'
26.00'
page 113
—RECLAIM BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT, 10" DEPTH
L2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
8" AGGREGATE BASE
12" SELECT GRANULAR
EXISTING TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SPOT REPAIR OF
BROKEN CURB
26.00'
—2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
5" RECLAIMED BITUMINOUS & AGGR.
PROPOSED TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
Typical Sections Not to Scale
City of Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights Road Street Rehabilitation
FIGURE: 3 Stantec
DATE: Dec 2016 PROJ. NO.: 193803763
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
wwwstantec.com
page 114
APPENDIX B/OPINION OF PROBABLE
COST
page 115
Mendota Heights Road
Street Rehabilitation
Preliminary Opinion of Probable Costs
December 7, 2016
Item
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Participating
Mobilization
LS
1
$50,000
$50,000
Traffic Control
LS
1
$10,000
$10,000
Reclaim Bituminous Pavement, 12" Depth
SY
9780
$5
$48,900
Mill Bituminous Pavement, 2" Depth
SY
1350
$3
$4,050
Remove Bituminous Pavement, 6" Depth
SY
5880
$3
$17,640
Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
LF
1770
$25
$44,250
Common Excavation
CY
5370
$10
$53,700
Subgrade Preparation
SY
15660
$2
$31,320
Subgrade Correction
CY
530
$10
$5,300
Granular Borrow
CY
2690
$18
$48,420
Aggregate Base, Class 5
TN
2030
$18
$36,540
Place Salvaged Reclaim Material
TN
2030
$9
$18,270
Bituminous Base Course
TN
4870
$70
$340,900
Bituminous Wearing Course
TN
2360
$75
$177,000
Concrete Pedestrian Ramp
EA
4
$1,200
$4,800
Bituminous Trail, Mill and Overlay
SY
2480
$20
$49,600
Turf Restoration
SY
590
$6
$3,540
Traffic Marking
LS
1
$10,000
$10,000
Subtotal
$954,230
10% Contingency
$95,500
25% Indirect Costs
$238,600
Total
$1,288,330
Item
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Non -Participating
Adjust Storm Sewer Casting
EA
16
$500
$8,000
Replace Storm Sewer Casting
EA
7
$800
$5,600
Replace Storm Catch Basin
EA
4
$5,000
$20,000
Bituminous Trail, w/ Pedestrian Ramp
LS
1
$10,000
$10,000
Traffic Marking, 12" Solid White Stripe
LF
100
$10
$1,000
Subtotal
$44,600
10% Contingency
$4,500
25% Indirect Costs
$1 1,200
Total
$60,300
Appendix B-1
page 116
Item
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Condon Court - MSA Non -Participating
$403,955
Total Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation Project Cost
$1,752,585
Mobilization
LS
1
$15,000
$15,000
Traffic Control
LS
1
$1,000
$1,000
Reclaim Bituminous Pavement, 12" Depth
SY
2300
$5
$11,500
Salvage Storm Sewer Pipe
LF
380
$10
$3,800
Replace Concrete Curb and Gutter
LF
360
$25
$9,000
Common Excavation
CY
260
$10
$2,600
Subgrade Preparation
SY
2300
$2
$4,600
Subgrade Correction
CY
80
$10
$800
Aggregate Base, Class 5
TN
160
$18
$2,880
Bituminous Base Course
TN
400
$70
$28,000
Bituminous Wearing Course
TN
240
$75
$18,000
Sanitary Sewer, 8" PVC, SDR 26
LF
941
$75
$70,575
Sanitary Sewer 9"OD HDPE DR -1 1, Dir. Drill
LF
510
$180
$91,800
4' Dia Sanitary Manhole
EA
5
$5,000
$25,000
Core Drill Ex. Manhole
EA
1
$2,000
$2,000
Install Salvaged Storm Sewer
LF
380
$20
$7,600
5'Dia Storm Manhole
EA
1
$5,000
$5,000
Subtotal
$299,155
10% Contingency
$30,000
25% Indirect Costs
$74,800
Total
$403,955
Cost Summary
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Participating
$1,288,330
Mendota Heights Road - MSA Non -Participating
$60,300
Condon Court - MSA Non -Participating
$403,955
Total Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation Project Cost
$1,752,585
Appendix B-2
page 117
APPENDIX C/PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
ROLE
page 118
Mendota Heights Road Street Rehabilitation
Preliminary Assessment Role
December 9, 2016
Mendota
Hei • hts Road Pro • erties
1
Parcel ID
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Plat Name
Lot/
Block
Total
Area
(Ac)
Lot F/F
(Ft)
Proposed
Sheet
Assessment
Proposed
Sanitary
Assessment
2741 3001 401 5
PATTERSON COMPANIES INC
1031 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1419
KAVANAUGH & DAWSONS SUB
1 14
2.42
432
$44,186
$0
275667501010
PATTERSON DENTAL CO
1031 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1401
PATTERSON COMPANIES ADD
1 1
13.71
451
$46,130
$0
270350051010
ST THOMAS ACADEMY
949 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1496
SECTION 35 TWN 28 RANGE 23
35 28 23
37.17
1322
$135,219
$0
270350076020
ST THOMAS ACADEMY
949 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1496
SECTION 35 TWN 28 RANGE 23
35 28 23
5.15
140
$14,320
$0
276610001010
ST THOMAS ACADEMY
949 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
ST THOMAS ACADEMY ADDITION
1 1
9.62
614
$62,802
$0
276610001020
ST THOMAS ACADEMY
949 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
ST THOMAS ACADEMY ADDITION
2 1
11.03
724
$74,053
$0
270350081010
VISITATION MONASTERY
2455 VISITATION DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1677
SECTION 35 TWN 28 RANGE 23
35 28 23
28.07
1033
$105,659
$0
270350078010
VISITATION MONASTERY
2455 VISITATION DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55120-1677
SECTION 35 TWN 28 RANGE 23
35 28 23
23.19
1011
$103,409
$0
Totals
130.36
5727
$585,778
$0
Condon Court Properties
Parcel ID
Owner
Owner Address
City/State/Zip
Site Address
Plat Name
Lot/
Block
Total Proposed Proposed
Area Street Sanitary
(Ac) RLE * Assessment Assessment
270350080021
CONDON COURT EXCHANGE LLC
PO BOX 248
CENTER CITY MN 55012-0248
2535 CONDON CT
Unplatted
Unplatted
0.38
1
$3,950
$47,157
270350080010
DICK BJORKLUND PROPERTIES LLC
2324 FIELD STONE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2511 CONDON CT
Pending Plat
Pending Plat
0.71
2.5
$9,875
$117,892
270350080022
DICK BJORKLUND PROPERTIES LLC
2324 FIELD STONE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120
2525 CONDON CT
Pending Plat
Pending Plat
0.55
2.5
$9,875
$117,892
Totals
1.64
6 $23,700
$282,941
* Residential Lot Equivalent (RLE)
Appendix C - 1
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
1101 Victoria Curve 1 MencbotaReightss.MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
Request for City Council Action
MEETING DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: City Council
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP
Interim Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case 2016-43
Discussion and Ordinance Options Relating to Domestic Chickens
COMMENT:
Introduction
The City Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider the question of permitting domestic
chickens in Mendota Heights. A group of residents is advocating for allowing chickens and staff has
worked with them to develop options for the Planning Commission to consider. The Planning
Commission discussed the issue at their December 21, 2016 meeting.
Background
Domestic chickens are currently not allowed in the City.
Discussion
The attached memo outlines the issues and options for code amendments, should the Commission wish to
recommend a course of action.
Planning Commission Action
At their December 21, 2016 meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the issue and
voted 4-2 to recommend that the City Council allow domestic chickens in the City and forwarded the
Stantec planning report to the City Council for direction, including ordinance examples from adjacent
communities.
Action Required
The City Council is asked to give direction to the Planning Commission and City staff on the issue of
domestic chickens. If the City Council agrees with the Planning Commission position that domestic
chickens should be allowed, then the Council is asked to give direction as to the approach the Council
might favor. City staff can then craft an ordinance for the Planning Commission to officially review. If
the Council does not agree with the Planning Commission recommendation that would end discussion of
the issue for now.
irwool"""'
CITY OF
IMENDOTA HEIGHTS
1101 Victoria Curve 1 MendotaC/eigh 20N 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
Request for Planning Commission Action
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2016
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP
Interim Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case 2016-43
Discussion and Ordinance Options Relating to Domestic Chickens
COMMENT:
Introduction
The City Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider the question of permitting domestic
chickens in Mendota Heights. A group of residents is advocating for allowing chickens and staff has worked
with them to develop options for the Planning Commission to consider.
Background
Domestic chickens are currently not allowed in the City.
Discussion
The attached memo outlines the issues and options for code amendments, should the Commission wish to
recommend a course of action.
Action Required
The Planning Commission is asked to give direction to the City Council on the issue of domestic chickens.
This a public hearing on potential options only and the Planning Commission can choose to recommend
code amendments or not, to the City Council.
19
Stantec
MEMORANDUM
page 121
Date: December 21, 2016
To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission
From: Phil Carlson, AICP
Re: Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
The City Council has asked the Planning Commission to discuss the issue of keeping chickens in
residential neighborhoods in Mendota Heights, which is not currently allowed by Mendota
Heights zoning. This memorandum summarizes two potential approaches to an ordinance,
provides information on potential issues and opportunities associated with allowing chickens,
and provides a comparison of codes from other cities allowing chickens in residential areas.
CODE APPROACH OPTIONS
If the City wishes to allow raising chickens in residential areas, there are two basic approaches -
through the zoning code or through the animal control code.
Zoning Approach
The Mendota Heights Zoning Code could be amended in several places to allow the keeping of
chickens as an accessory use, which might be accomplished as follows, in all single family
residential zoning districts (R-1, R-1 A, R-1 B, R-1 C):
1) Chicken would be added to the definition of Domestic Animals
2) Chicken coops would be added to the definition of Animal Kennels
3) A kennel for chickens would be added to the list of permitted accessory structures
4) Clarify that only one chicken enclosure is allowed
Animal Control Approach
A second, alternate approach would be to amend the Code through animal control and not
involve zoning. Regulations on domestic animals are in Title 5 Police Regulations of the Mendota
Heights Code, Chapter 3 - Dogs and Cats. The current code deals only with cats and dogs, but
chickens could be added to the chapter. This approach could allow chickens as follows:
1) Rename the Dogs and Cats section to Domestic Animals
2) Add a new section on chickens, stating that up to four female chickens are allowed as a
domestic animal.
3) A chicken coop or enclosure would need to meet the standards for an accessory
structure in the Zoning Code.
4) Enforcement would be by the same "animal warden" who enforces regulations on dogs
and cats.
20
CIO Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission - Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
December 21, 2016
Concern - Animal Warden Responsibilities and Enforcement
page 122
Currently in Mendota Heights the Police Chief is designated as the animal warden, responsible
for dealing with stray or dangerous dogs, and the occasional coyote, deer or other problem
animal. This authority is contracted to an outside firm for $3,000/year. Enforcement is on a
complaint basis only and there is no regular personnel assigned to patrol the city for problem
animals. Zoning enforcement is also on a complaint basis and will be part of the discussion
around the new Community Development Director position to be filled soon. Enforcement of
chickens would be an added duty that is not currently contemplated or funded by the Police
Department, the Planning Department or the City Council, and would need to be part of any
new scheme to allow chickens.
ABOUT CHICKENS IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
It is increasingly popular in many communities throughout the Twin Cities, and the nation, to
allow residents to have chickens in their back yards as pets and for the production of eggs.
Currently, dozens of communities in the region allow for chickens in residential neighborhoods.
The issue is also gaining traction in community planning as a way to increase access to healthy
food, which is an issue of growing concern and interest for many.
The Minnesota Food Charter's Food Access Planning Guide has developed numerous policies
that support raising chickens in urban and suburban areas. These policies include:
• Support practices that integrate healthy food in residential settings
• Adopt regulations that establish standards for gardening and urban farming that are
compatible with neighboring properties and promote public health
• Review and simplify regulations for food and farm related land uses to improve the
variety of food options in the community
The MN Green Step Cities program has also developed best practices promoting backyard
chickens including:
• Facilitate the creation of home and community gardens, chicken and bee keeping, and
incorporation of food growing areas in residential developments.
CHICKENS IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS
A number of Mendota Heights residents are interested in the possibility of housing chickens in
their yards. These residents have brought their ideas to the City for review.
21
CIO Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission - Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
December 21, 2016
ISSUES
page 123
Many communities have raised conflicting issues and concerns regarding chickens in residential
neighborhoods. Often, the debate stems from a desire to preserve the character of single family
neighborhoods while allowing property owners to reasonably use their property. Communities
allowing chickens have attempted to balance these concerns and enhance their
neighborhoods. Some of the key issues are listed below.
Noise: Typically, urban and suburban communities only allow hens in their residential
neighborhoods. The noise associated with roosters is considered a nuisance to neighboring
residents.
Chicken Coops and Proper Maintenance: A major concern for nearby residents is the safety and
security of chickens in an urban area. Problems can arise if the chickens escape their yard or if
coops and pens are not well maintained. Most communities which allow for chickens require
that the chickens are housed in a coop that meets certain maintenance requirements. Often,
animal control or another city department will conduct inspections to ensure safety standards
are met. Examples of chicken coops and pens are illustrated below:
Public Health: Another concern associated with having chickens is the potential for public health
concerns associated with animals and waste. Chickens and other fowl can carry diseases that
are harmful to other fowl or animals. If not cleaned, chickens can also harbor mites in their
feathers. Additionally, chicken feed and food scraps can attract rodents and other pests. To
mitigate these problems, some cities have special requirements for coop cleaning, waste
removal, security of feed, "dirt baths" for chickens to clean themselves, and slaughtering.
Eggs: Most chickens kept on residential urban and suburban properties are used to raise eggs.
Home chickens can present a new food source for residents looking for an organic, local
alternative to eggs purchased in the grocery store. Chickens produce eggs for 4-5 years.
22
CIO Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission - Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
page 124
December 21, 2016 4
Pest Management: Chickens eat insects and can provide an alternative to pesticide based
management strategies.
Domestic Animals and Pets: Chickens and other domesticated farm animals are not typically
treated as pets by municipal animal control departments. However, some chicken owners have
found their animals to be friendly, tame, companion animals. Chickens live 10-12 years.
Private Property Rights: Some advocates of chickens in residential areas believe that keeping
chickens is within their rights as a property owner, so long as any negative externalities caused
by the animals are mitigated.
CODE COMPARISON
Many communities have allowed chickens within their residential zoning districts, with varying
restrictions. The table on the following page summarizes a few different code options from
communities around Mendota Heights. Full code language for some of these municipalities is
attached.
Edina has a different approach - not connected to zoning at all, but to animal control. In the
Animal section of their code up to four chickens are allowed.
None of the communities studied required a minimum lot size for having chickens in residential
neighborhoods.
Vadnais Heights is in the process of adopting the code summarized below. This memo reflects
the most current draft version.
23
Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission - Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
December 21, 2016
ZONING FOR CHICKENS - CODE COMPARISON OF SELECTED CITIES
page 125
5
Community
License/Permit
Required?
Standards
West St. Paul
Yes
• Maximum: 2 chickens
• Residents can have more than 2 chickens pending City Council
approval
Eagan
Yes
• Maximum: 5 chickens
• Coop and run required: chickens are restricted to this area or a
fenced yard
• Minimum coop size: 2 square feet per chicken
• Owner must reside on the premises
• Eggs are for personal consumption only
• Roosters are prohibited
Burnsville
Yes
• Maximum: 4 chickens
• Coop and run required: chickens are restricted to this area
• Minimum coop size: 10 square feet per chicken, limited to 6' in
height
• Screening is required
• Roosters are prohibited
Bloomington
No
• Maximum: 4 chickens
• Coop and run required: chickens are restricted to this area
• Maximum coop size: 120 square feet, limited to 6' in height
• Screening is required
• Roosters are prohibited
• Proper disposal of waste is required (not compostable)
Richfield
No
• Maximum: 3 chickens
Inver Grove
Heights
Yes
• Maximum: 6 chickens
• Coop and run required: chickens are restricted to this area
• Roosters are prohibited
Vadnais
Heights
Yes
• Maximum: 5 chickens on lots less than 1 acre, on lots larger, 5
additional chickens per acre with a maximum of 20 chickens
• Coop is required
• Coop size: minimum 4 square feet per chicken required with a
maximum area of 120 square feet. Height is limited to 12 feet.
• Roosters are prohibited
• Other uses of chickens such as meat, breeding, and fighting are
prohibited
Minneapolis
Yes
• Maximum: 6 chickens
• Screening is required
• Regular maintenance of coops is required.
• Fecal waste and litter should be double bagged and disposed of
in the trash.
• Animal control inspects the property for safety and cleanliness
annually.
• Roosters are prohibited
• Slaughtering of animals is prohibited
Edina
No
• Maximum: 4 chickens
• Regulated with animals, not zoning
• Enclosure required 20 feet from lot line, <300 square feet in size
24
Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission — Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
page 126
December 21, 2016 6
CODE OPTIONS - DETAILS
Zoning Approach
The code amendments would be as follows. The amendments to permitted accessory uses in
Section 12-1 E involve the R-1 District, but the code for R-1 A, R-1 B and R-1 C refers back to the R-1
uses, so those other districts would also allow chickens if this approach is adopted. Suggested
amendments to the current code are in blue underline text.
12-1B-2 Definitions:
ANIMALS, DOMESTIC: Dogs, cats, birds and other common domestic household pets including
female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) kept for purposes of companionship or household -use
egg production only.
KENNEL, ANIMAL: A place where three (3) or more of any single type of domestic animal or
up to 6 female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus), over four (4) months of age, are owned,
boarded, bred or offered for sale.
12-1D-3: Accessory Structures
(C) 2. Accessory structures (other than detached, private garages) in all residential districts:
a. Number And Size:
(1) Accessory buildings (other than detached, private garages) shall not exceed one thousand
(1,000) square feet.
(2) Property is four (4) acres or less: One accessory structure with the area not to exceed one
hundred forty four (144) square feet and one enclosed animal kennel with the area not to
exceed one hundred forty four (144) square feet used solely for the purposes of keeping
female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus)
(3) Property is more than four (4) acres*: Total area cannot exceed four hundred twenty five
(425) square feet, provided:
(A) No single structure shall exceed two hundred twenty five (225) square feet.
(B) No more than three (3) accessory structures may be erected, with no more than one
25
Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission — Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
page 127
December 21, 2016 7
enclosed animal kennel used solely for the purposes of keeping female chickens (Gallus
gallus domesticus)
12-1E-3: R-1 One -Family Residential District:
C. Permitted Accessory Uses: Within the R-1 one -family residential district, the following uses
shall be permitted accessory uses:
Domestic animals, as defined herein, keeping for noncommercial purposes, including
horses for the use of the occupants of the premises; provided, that any accessory building
used for housing such animals shall be located not less than one hundred feet (100') from
the nearest residence with the exception of an accessory building used as an animal
kennel solely for the purposes of keeping female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus)
which is subject to 12-1D-3.
Keeping of up to 6 female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) over four (4) months of
age for the purposes of companionship or household -use egg production.
Domestic Animal Code Approach
The code amendments would be as follows. Suggested amendments to the current code are in
blue underline text.
Chapter 3
DOGS AND CATS DOMESTIC ANIMALS
5-3-10: CHICKENS
A. Up to six female chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, may be kept on a residential premise as
domestic animals, provided such chickens are kept in an accessory structure meeting the
provisions of the Zoning Code. Such structure must be constructed so that it may be easily
cleaned, and so that the chickens are completely enclosed and protected from children and
animals on the outside.
26
CIO Stantec
Mendota Heights Planning Commission - Chickens in Residential Neighborhoods
page 128
December 21, 2016 8
B. The animal warden has the authority to enter upon private premises whenever there is
reasonable cause to believe that chickens are being mistreated or pose a threat to the health
and safety of people or other animals.
[Renumber the last two sections of Chapter 3:]
5 3 14 5 3 11: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS
5 3 11 5 3 12: PENALTY
OPTIONS
The Planning Commission has a number of options:
1) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the zoning
code approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or revisions.
2) Recommend to the City Council that they approve an ordinance using the animal
control approach to allowing domestic chickens, with or without conditions or
revisions.
3) Recommend denial of the proposal to allow domestic chickens in the City.
4) Recommend another course of action to city staff or the City Council.
27
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEGGHTS
page 129
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mendota Heights City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Police Chief Hire—Kelly McCarthy
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to affirm the hiring of Kelly McCarthy as Police Chief, and to
approve an employment agreement with her for the position. This would be for regular status, and
not an interim Chief position.
BACKGROUND
Kelly McCarthy began working as a Captain for the Mendota Heights Police Department on
November 1, 2016. On December 20th, following the announcement of the retirement of
Michael Aschenbrener as Police Chief, the then -City Council appointed Ms. McCarthy as his
successor. However, Ms. McCarthy wanted the new City Council (that which will be seated on
January 3rd) to be the body which would make the final decision. For that reason, the item is
on the January 3rd agenda, to affirm the previous Council's action.
An employment agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions of her employment with the
city, was approved for her as Captain. That has been updated to reflect the Chief position. The
changes from the Employment Agreement for the Captain's position are:
1. Salary. She was hired at $110,000 as Captain. Step E of Pay Grade 43--$118,000--has
been negotiated and is recommended.
2. Vacation. The current Employment Agreement incorrectly lists one week of vacation
"on the books". It was actually negotiated to be two weeks; this Agreement reflects that.
(Starting with a balance of two weeks for experienced employees is not uncommon.)
Ms. McCarthy went through an extensive vetting process during her selection as Police
Captain. She is well qualified to be Chief, and I don't think that a process to advertise
specifically for a Police Chief would yield a better candidate. As with all Police employees,
there is a one year probationary period, and therefore in my opinion an interim designation is
unwarranted.
page 130
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the Council affirm the hiring of Kelly McCarthy as Police Chief, effective
January 4th, and also approve the resolution authorizing the Employment Agreement with her
as Police Chief.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion, take the following actions:
1. Affirm the appointment of Kelly McCarthy as Police Chief/Emergency Management Director
for the City of Mendota Heights, effective January 4, 2017; and,
2. Approve Resolution 2017-08, regarding an Employment Agreement with Kelly McCarthy as
Police Chief.
Mark McNeill,
City Administrator
page 131
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION 2017- 08
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WITH KELLY MCCARTHY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota, has appointed Kelly McCarthy to be Police Chief for the Mendota Heights Police
Department, effective January 4, 2017, and
WHEREAS, it is desired to specify the terms of her employment with an Employment
Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the Employment Agreement for hiring Kelly McCarthy as a
Police Chief be approved.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
page 132
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
KELLY MCCARTHY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3r1 day of January, 2017, by and between the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred
to as the CITY, and Kelly McCarthy, hereinafter referred to as EMPLOYEE, to wit:
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ the services of Kelly McCarthy as Police Chief for the
Mendota Heights Police Department, as provided by the laws of the State of Minnesota and
relevant ordinances of the City of Mendota Heights; and EMPLOYEE desires to continue in the
employment of the City, and have a written agreement relative to the compensation, benefits,
requirements, and procedures for the employment of the EMPLOYEE of the City of Mendota
Heights. Although EMPLOYEE is not a member of the Minnesota Public Employees
Association, Sergeants Unit, she generally receives the benefits provided to the members of the
bargaining unit (see Section 8, below). These benefits and provisions contained in this
Employment Agreement shall be in addition to those otherwise afforded to members of the
Minnesota Public Employees Association, Sergeants Unit.
1. DUTIES — CITY hereby agrees to employ Kelly McCarthy at the position of
Police Chief of said City, to perform the function and duties specified in that position's job
description, and to perform duties specified under the ordinances of the City of Mendota
Heights and the laws of the State of Minnesota.
2. COMPENSATION — Effective upon her date of employment until December 31,
2016, EMPLOYEE shall be compensated at an annual rate of $118,000.00 ("Salary"), which is
Step "E" of Grade 43 of the 2017 Mendota Heights Employee Pay Classification Plan. Effective
January 1, 2018, and thereafter, EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to annual cost of living raises at
a rate equal to what is offered other non -contract employees of the City of Mendota Heights.
3. TERM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT -- Subject to the CITY's and
EMPLOYEE's right of termination, below, this Employment Agreement shall be in effect from
the date of approval by the Mendota Heights City Council, until June 30, 2018.
4. TERMINATION BY CITY — City has the right to terminate, with or without just
cause, EMPLOYEE'S employment during the term of this Employment Agreement.
(a) Termination without Cause. Should the City unilaterally terminate without just cause
the employment of EMPLOYEE by majority vote of the City Council effective during
the term or effective on the June 30, 2018, expiration date of this Employment
1
page 133
Agreement, it shall provide to the EMPLOYEE a notice of sixty (60) days, prior to the
effective date of the termination. During this sixty day period, the City Council may
choose to put the EMPLOYEE on paid administrative leave, or allow the EMPLOYEE to
continue to perform duties assigned by the City. Upon the effective date of the
termination, the CITY shall pay to the EMPLOYEE a lump sum cash payment equivalent
to six months' salary, in addition to all of the employee's accumulated accrued leave
time. During the sixty day notice period, and for the six month period associated with the
lump sum cash payment, CITY shall continue to pay CITY share of all benefits afforded
in this agreement in effect at the time of termination.
(b) Termination for Just Cause. In the event EMPLOYEE is terminated for just cause,
EMPLOYEE will not receive the sixty (60) day notice of termination or any lump sum
cash payment, including pay for accumulated accrued leave time. "Just cause" shall be
defined according to the usual and commonly accepted principles of labor law, and shall
include but not be limited to malfeasance in office, gross misconduct, conviction for a
felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to employee.
(c) Limitation. In no event will the amount paid to EMPLOYEE upon termination by the
CITY exceed the amount permitted by applicable law.
5. TERMINATION BY EMPLOYEE—At such time as the EMPLOYEE chooses to
terminate her employment with the City, the EMPLOYEE shall provide sixty days' notice of her
intent to leave.
6. CITY VEHICLE --The CITY shall provide a City police vehicle for the use of the
EMPLOYEE for commuting purposes, and for accessing police -work related job locations,
during and after normal working hours. Said vehicles shall be equipped as an emergency
response vehicle, including computer access to CJIN, and a police radio.
7. VACATION AND SICK LEAVE --EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to accrue paid
vacation at the rate of 120 hours per year. Upon commencing employment, EMPLOYEE shall
be credited with 80 hours of paid vacation, 24 hours of personal leave, and 24 hours of extended
disability leave.
8. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT - In addition to the benefits
citied herein, the CITY shall provide the EMPLOYEE with any and all benefits that apply to
other provisions of the agreement with the Minnesota Public Employees Association, Sergeants
Unit. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this employment agreement and the
CITY's Personnel Code, Resolution No. 85-107, or any other personnel regulations or policy of
the CITY, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
9. GENERAL PROVISIONS - This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Minnesota. This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
hereto. If during the term of this Agreement any specific clause of the Agreement is determined
to be illegal by a judicial decision or binding Minnesota Attorney General Opinion, the
remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected by such a determination and shall remain in
2
page 134
force. The parties will meet to negotiate regarding an amendment to the Agreement to replace the
provision declared illegal. Failure of either party to insist, in any one or more instances, upon
the performance of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT or to exercise any right hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or
relinquishment of the future exercise of such right, but the obligation of the other party with
respect to such future performance shall continue in full force and effect.
This agreement was reviewed and considered by the City Council and approved by Resolution
No. 2017-_ by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, on January 3,
2017.
EMPLOYEE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Kelly McCarthy Neil Garlock, Mayor
Date
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
Date
3
cowman'
in
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 135
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Fire Officer Selection Committee
COMMENT:
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to appoint two of its members to serve on a selection panel to
interview and recommend to the full Council a new Fire Chief, and subsequently any position
which might become vacant as a result of that promotion. It should also designate the members
of the panel
BACKGROUND
At its meeting of December 20th, the City Council accepted with regret the notice of retirement
of long time Fire Chief John Maczko. He is leaving his post on February 28, 2017. Ideally, his
successor, and any position in the Mendota Heights Fire Department which might have to be
backfilled as a result of that promotion, would be determined by that time.
Notice of the availability of the Fire Chief position has been made to the MHFD. Applications
were due by the close of business on Friday, December 30th. The City Council will be informed
of the number of candidates at its meeting of January 3rd
One of the recommendations to fill the process is to follow Fire Department protocol, and
establish a selection panel to perform interviews for the Chief's vacancy. The recommended
make-up of that panel is two members of the City Council, two members of the Fire Department,
a Fire Chief from another city, the Mendota Heights Police Chief, and the City Administrator.
The final makeup should be determined by the City Council once it is known how many
candidates are to be considered. The Fire Department has chosen Gordy Skjerven and Cory
Lane as its representatives.
page 136
The City Council should designate two of its members to serve on the panel. The panel would
likely convene the second week of January.
Once the Chief is selected, that same panel, but with the new Chief to replace the Chief from the
other community, would interview candidates for any newly vacant position, should one be
created as a result of the promotion.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council should designate two of its members to serve.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council, by motion, should take the following actions regarding the Fire Officer
Selection Panel:
1. Determine which two of its members will serve on the panel; and
2. Appoint the membership of the Selection Panel.
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Designation of Acting Mayor
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
page 137
leiahts. MN 55118
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to appoint one of its members to serve as Acting Mayor.
BACKGROUND
Minnesota State Statute 412.121 requires each City to appoint an acting mayor at the first City
Council meeting of the year. The law provides that the acting mayor shall perform the duties of
the mayor during the disability or absence of the mayor from the city or in event of vacancy in
the office of the mayor, until such time a successor has been appointed.
The acting mayor has been selected at the will of the City Council, with no established pattern.
Recently, the acting mayor position for the City of Mendota Heights has been held by the
following councilmembers:
2016: Michael Povolny
2015: Liz Petschel
2014: Liz Petschel
2013: Liz Petschel
2012: Jack Vitelli
2011: Jack Vitelli
2010: Jack Vitelli
2009: Mary Jeanne Schneeman
2008: Ultan Duggan
2007: Sandra Krebsbach
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City Council should discuss, and approve a motion naming one of the councilmembers to
serve as the acting mayor for 2017.
This action requires a majority vote.
fit IrWilliiii.lib'
M{CITY OF
MENDGTA HEIGHTS
page 138
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Liaison Appointments
Introduction:
The Council is asked to discuss appointments to various liaison positions for the City,
Background:
The following advisory boards require City Council action to designate appointments to
represent the City:
Dakota Communications Commission—Meets 3rd Thursday every other month. 8-10 AM
Primary—City Councilor Ultan Duggan
Alternate—Vacant (had been Councilor Mike Povolny)
MSP Noise Oversight Committee (Meets every other third Wednesday 1:30-3:30 PM)
Primary—Vacant (had been Councilor Liz Petschel)
Alternate—Jill Smith
Traffic Safety Committee (Meets as needed)
City Council—Councilor Liz Petschel
Planning Commission—Litton Field
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Lower Mississippi River Watershed
Citizen Rep --Mary Jean Schneeman
Alternate --Jill Smith
NDC4 Cable Commission (Meets quarterly Thursdays at 7 PM)
Citizen Rep—Micky Kieffer
Elected Official—Vacant (had been Mayor Sandra Krebsbach)
page 139
Dakota County E -W Transit Study Commission (Meets as needed)
Representative—Vacant (had been Mayor Sandra Krebsbach)
Alternate—Vacant (had been Councilor Steve Norton)
Dakota County Sheriff's Advisory Board
Representative—Councilor Liz Petschel
Recommendation
The Council should discuss and indicate how appointments shall be filled.
Action Required
The Council should, by motion, designate and then approve the reappointments or filling of
vacancies as determined for the above advisory boards and liaison positions.
page 140
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2017 - 10
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
NDC4 ADVISORY COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights benefits from the
active participation of citizens in our advisory commissions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the excellent service provided by the
following commission members whose term expires on January 31, 2017.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the following commissioner is reappointed to
a term on the NDC4 Commission:
Mickey Kieffer - term starting February 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2019
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mendota Heights City Council does
hereby appoint the following Councilmember to the NDC4 Commission:
- term starting February 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2019
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of January, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Neil Garlock, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 141
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
DATE: January 3, 2017
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Set Time to Interview Parks and Recreation Commissioner Candidates
COMMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to set a time to interview individuals who have applied for one of two
vacancies on the City's Parks and Recreation Commission.
BACKGROUND
The election of Joel Paper and Jay Miller to the City Council has created two vacancies on the
Parks and Recreation Commission. Notices informing Mendota Heights residents of the
openings were made. Applications were accepted until the close of business on December 30th
The City Council will be advised of the number of candidates at the January 3rd meeting.
By Mendota Heights practice, the full City Council interviews the candidates. The amount of
time needed to interview the candidates will depend upon on how many applications are
received.
Possible dates and times will be presented for discussion at the January 3rd meeting. It is
probable that the January meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission will need to be
rescheduled in order to accommodate the filling of these positions, as the earliest the
appointments could be made is January 17th.
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council should designate a date and time in which interviews for the Parks and
Recreation Commission candidates will be held.