Loading...
2015-03-17 Council Packet CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 17, 2015 7:00 pm Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adopt Agenda 5. Consent Agenda a. Approval of March 3, 2015 City Council Minutes b. Receipt of February 2015 Fire Department Synopsis Report c. Authorize Purchase of Lawn Mower d. Approval of Resolution 2015-25, Formally Acknowledging Receipt of Gift of Two Remington 870 Shotguns e. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for St. Thomas Academy for April 18, 2015 f. Recognize Firefighter Retirement g. Personnel Action Item h. Approval of Ordinance 474 Amend Code Section 9-6-1 Regarding Fees and approve the summary publication i. Receipt of February 2015 Building Activity Report j. Approval of February k. Approval of Claims List l. Approval of Contractor List 6. Public Comments 7. Presentations 8. Public Hearing a. Resolution 2015-23, Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, Variance at 731 Woodridge Drive, Planning Case 2015-06 9. New and Unfinished Business a. Traffic Safety Committee Update b. Approve 2015 Contract for Pilot Knob Management c. Appointments to Noise Oversight Committee d. Set May Goal Setting Workshop e. Ordinance 473 Amend City Code Section 12-1L-10 Concerning After-the-Fact Permit Fees f. Resolution 2015-19 Approving Amendments to Fee Schedule g. Ordinance 471 Amend City Code Section 12-2 Concerning Wetlands Permit Requirements h. Discussion of memorial options for Officer Scott Patrick 10. Community Announcements 11. Council Comments 12. Adjourn page 3 5a. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 3, 2015 Pursuant to due call and notice, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Krebsbach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Councilmembers Povolny, Petschel, and Norton. Councilmember Duggan was absent. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Krebsbach presented the agenda for adoption. Councilmember Petschel moved adoption of the revised agenda. Councilmember Norton seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Krebsbach presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilmember Povolny moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a.Approval of February 17, 2015 City Council Minutes b.Approval of February 17, 2015 City Council Closed Session Minutes c.Approval of February 13, 2015 Airport Relations Commission Minutes d.Approval of February 24, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes e.Receipt of January 2015 Fire Department Synopsis Report f.Approval of December Treasurer's Report g.Approval of January Treasurer's Report h.Approval of Claims List i.Approval of Contractor List Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 1 page 4 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PRESENTATION A) FRIENDLY HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL FUTURE CITIES PRESENTATION Public Works Director John Mazzitello explained that Friendly Hills Middle School has participated in the Future Cities Competition for the last seven years. This is a program sponsored by the American thth Society of Civil Engineers where 6through 8graders are challenged to design and present a futuristic city based on a specific theme. The theme this year was Feeding Your Future City. The teams were challenged to produce one protein and one vegetable in sufficient quantities to feed their city for the entire year and how to get that product from production to market. Friendly Hills entered three teams in the competition.Students presented their scale models and an oral presentation at the University of Minnesota on January 15, 2015. In addition, they produced an essay, a narrative, and a Sims City software computer model of their city. For the first time ever, Friendly Hills Middle School produced a team in the final five and produced a state finalist. Mazzitello introduced the instructor in charge of the program and four of the students who were in the competition. B) SAINT THOMAS ACADEMY ROGERS LAKE WATER QUALITY REPORT Saint Thomas Academy Environmental Science Class students have been monitoring the water quality of Rogers Lake since 2001. Mr. Tony Kinzley, Advanced Placement Environmental Sciences Instructor, introduced the students responsible for the monitoring activities this year. The students explained the overall purpose of their testing, what kind of tests they performed with an explanation of each, the results of the tests, and a comparison of those test results to last year. An overall rating was then extrapolated into a composite score of all nine chemical tests. The overall rating for Rogers Lake improved from 78.6 in 2013 to 80.8 in 2014. PUBLIC HEARING A) VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR THE LEMAY LAKE SHORES DEVELOPMENT Public Works Director John Mazzitello explained the purpose of the public hearing is to vacate two drainage utility and roadway easements in conjunction with the Lemay Lake Shores Development project. The easements are located near the entrance of the Lemay Lake Shores Development. Mayor Krebsbach opened the public hearing. Mr. Shawn Winzel of Ryland Homes came forward to answer questions from the Council and share an image of the area with the drainage utility and roadway easements highlighted. Councilmembers asked questions pertaining to the location of the easements in relation to Resurrection Cemetery. March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 page 5 Ms. Gina Norling, 1280 Lakeview Avenue, wished to have it noted that the notice she received was dated February 17 and received on or about February 21. She stated she is unclear what this vacation is granting.Public Works Director Mazzitello explained these easements grant permission to another entity to use the portion of property for their purposes. In this case, the underlying property owner, formally Resurrection Cemetery and now Ryland Homes, had an easement granted to the City of Mendota Heights for utility and roadway access purposes. The city has determined that those easements are no longer needed.Ms. Norling expressed her appreciation for the clarification and stated that she has no objections to the vacation. Councilmember Norton moved to close the public hearing Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 Councilmember Povolny moved to adopt Resolution 2015-15, A RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENTS AT LOTS 39, 40, AND 42, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION, MENDOTA. Councilmember Norton seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A)PLANNING CASE 2015-01, APPROVING CRITICAL AREA PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE AND WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION AT 1680 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ROAD, RESOLUTION 2015-16 Planner Nolan Wall explained that the applicant intends to demolish the existing structures and construct anew single-family dwelling with an attached garage on the property at 1680 Mayfield Heights Road. This property is within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. As a result of the request, the proposed project requires four separate applications; Critical Area Permit to demolish the existing structures and construct a new dwelling, Conditional Use Permit for new development in the critical area, Variance to allow grading the site affecting slopes over 18%, and Wetlands Permit for construction activity within 100 feet of the wetland and water resource related area. The subject parcel is 1.42 acres and contains an existing single-family dwelling as well as a detached garage. The property is zoned R-1 and guided for low-density residential development in the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmembers asked questions pertaining to the slopes impacted, direction of the drainage flow, and landscape plans for the property. Councilmember Petschel moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2015-16 APPROVING CRITICAL AREA PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE AND WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATIONS AT 1680 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ROAD based on the findings of factand conditions as stated in the resolution. March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 page 6 Councilmember Norton seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 B)PLANNING CASE 2015-02, APPROVING WETLANDS PERMIT AT 2540 ARBOR COURT, RESOLUTION 2015-17 PlannerNolan Wall explained the request for a Wetlands Permit to remove vegetation at 2540 Arbor Court. The subject parcel is 2.42 acres, contains an existing single-family dwelling abutting a wetland to the north, zoned R-1 and guided for low-density residential development on the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant intends to construct an approximate 390 square foot addition to the dwelling and an approximately 352 square-foot deck on the east side of the dwelling, extending into the rear yard. The entire structure is located within the 100-foot wetland and water resource related area. They received a wetlands permit in 2005 as part of Planning Case 2005-30. Planner Wall also noted that the vegetation removal is essentially one tree. The proposed improvements would be approximately 29 feet from the edge of the wetland and, as noted, there would be one tree removed in the rear yard. The addition and deck would be constructed on posts, resulting in minimal impacts to the existing grades and would be further reviewed as part of a building permit application. In addition, appropriate erosion control measures would be used during construction and no disturbance or vegetation removal would occur within the 25-foot non-disturb buffer area. The proposed improvements are compliant with the required rear and side yard setbacks. If approved, the applicant would start construction this summer. Councilmembers asked questions pertaining to the 25-foot non-disturb area and the 100-foot buffer area. Councilmember Norton moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2015-17 APPROVING A WETLANDS PERMIT AT 2540 ARBOR COURT based on the findings of fact and conditions as stated in the resolution. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 C) PLANNING CASE 2015-03, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 1897 DELAWARE AVENUE, RESOLUTION 2015-18 Planner Nolan Wall explained that the applicant, Verizon Wireless, was seeking a Conditional Use Permit to update an existing wireless antenna facility to incorporate advanced wireless service. The subject parcel is the Henry Sibley High School campus and District 197 offices. Planner Wall briefly highlighted the proposed plans. The applicant would not be adding any antennas but would be relocating the existing antennas giving them better access to do the service. In total, they March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 page 7 would be removing and relocating 12 panel antennas as well as upgrades to the associated cable boxes and lines that run on the rooftop. The upgraded equipment is compliant with the 15-foot height limit and would be painted the same color. There are no exterior modifications being proposed to the existing accessory structure. Councilmembers asked questions pertaining to an upgrade in service being a result of this request. Councilmember Norton moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2015-18 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 1897 DELAWARE AVENUE based on the findings of factand conditions as stated in the resolution. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 D) PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR CRITICAL AREA PERMIT AND VARIANCE AT 731 WOODRIDGE DRIVE Planner Nolan Wall explained that in June 2014 the property owner at 731 Woodridge Drive suffered a significant slope failure event in the rear yard of their property, which is above Highway 13. The impacted area is approximately 75 feet by 45 feet. As discussed in the letter from the property owners, they have been working to address the situation since that time and have decided on the scope of the project. The proposed project would include construction of a retaining wall and associated soil stabilization in the area, which does require a Critical Area Permit. Due to the nature of the work, a Conditional Use Permit and Variance requests would also be required as part of the application. According to the City Code this would normally require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. In order to expedite the approval process, the property owners are requesting that the application be exempted from Planning Commission review and a public hearing be held before the City Council on March 17, 2015. The property owners have submitted the required applications and supporting materials in compliance with the March application deadline. If approved,notices would be mailed to the surrounding property owners within 350 feet and would be published in the Sunday, March 8 edition of the Southwest Review. The 60-day timeline would still apply and the appropriate state agencies would be provided materials for review and comment. Councilmembers asked questions regarding the 60-day review timeline and the position that MnDOT has on this application. Councilmember Povolny moved to set the public hearing date for Tuesday, March 17 and direct staff to provide the required public notice. Councilmember Norton seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 page 8 E) RESOLUTION 2015-22, ACCEPTING BIDS & AWARD CONTRACT FOR SOMERSET STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS Assistant City Engineer Ryan Ruzek explained that the City has received ten bids for the Somerset Storm Water Improvement Project; however, four bids were not compliant with the specifications. Staff requested that those bids be rejected and the remaining six bids be accepted. Staff recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder, North Pine Aggregate, Inc. the State of Minnesota on securing disaster relief funds. Estimates have identified the repair being eligible for 75 percent reimbursement. The city has been asked to supply additional data, which could potentially allow the entire project to be reimbursed at 75 percent. The Spring Creek Project has not been identified for reimbursement. The projects would be funded through the Storm Sewer Utility Fund. Councilmembers asked questions regarding whether or not this project includes the area on Spring Creek Circle. Councilmember Petschel moved to adopt Resolution 2015-22, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE SOMERSET STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 F) RESOLUTION 2015-20, GRANTING COMCAST OF ST. PAUL, INC. A FRANCHISE EXTENSION TO MARCH 31, 2016 AND RESOLUTION 2015-21, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE GRANTEE Assistant to the City Administrator Tamara Schutta introduced Ms. Jodie Miller, NDC4 Executive Director,who provided an update on the current franchise agreement with Comcast. They are seeking approval of the resolutions which would extend the franchise agreement to March 31, 2016 and approve change of control of the grantee. Ms. Miller provided a brief background on the NDC4 Cable Commission. Cities joined together 30 plus years ago to pull their resources and do cable franchising together as a group. Over that 30 years,there have been two 15-year franchises with the cable operator whose common applied for and received a franchise for the City of Mendota Heights. The first one was from 1985 to 2000 and the second is just wrapping up which ran from 2000 to 2015. NDC4 started the renewal process of negotiating and preparing for a franchise renewal with Comcast. When nearing the final stages of negotiating the renewal, Comcast announced its major national transaction, a merger acquiring Time-Warner Cable. A couple of months later they announced that as part of that transaction they would be spinning off or divesting of the Minnesota properties along with some other states in the Midwest. The cable commission has been preparing documents and reviewing the transaction preparing recommendations because there is local authority for each cable commission to approve or deny locally that merger. March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 page 9 The NDC4 cable commission has approved the resolutions before the Council as recommendations. It is up to each individual city to vote on the transfer and also the recommendation of a 12-month extension of the current franchise to give them time to complete the renewal. Ms. Miller introduced Attorney Brian Grogan of Moss & Barnett representing the cable commission. Attorney Grogan highlighted a few features of this large transaction: Essentially Comcast is leaving the State of Minnesota A new company will be serving Mendota Heights; known today as Midwest Cable; if approved at the federal level, the cable company would be renamed GreatLand Connections 2.5 million customers; 550,000 in the Twin Cities (approximately 20% of total subscriber base) No performance history as this is a new entity Would be owned 1/3 by Charter Communications and 2/3 by Comcast Shareholders (not the corporate entity) GreatLand Connections will have a separate board of directors; be publicly traded; may be a Fortune 500 company the day they are created Have hired a retired CEO \[Michael Willner\] who has brought his executive team with him; management has sound experience; however, how will they execute the operational plan Impact to Mendota Heights: Local operational personnel will continue to be employed by the company Will be sub-contracting virtually all of the customer service operations; Charter Communications will be the one answering the phone Xfinity changing to Spectrum; will likely include virtually all of the same channels but not all of them; priced substantially the same but may not be identical (a condition of the resolution is that the cable company cannot use the financing of this transaction as an excuse to raise rates) A subscriber with triple play (phone, internet, television) will be able to keep the same phone number; most likely able to keep the same equipment; however, not the same email. A comcast.net email account will be switched during a three to six month transition period Automatic payments from a banking account will need to be updated to the new entity Councilmembers asked questions regarding the reimbursement condition and the chances of the merger actually being approved on the federal level. Mayor Krebsbach noted that grammatical corrections to the resolutions had been received from Councilmember Duggan; however, they could not be entertained as this is a legal document. Councilmember Norton moved to authorize the Mayor to sign Resolution 2015- 20; GRANTING COMCAST OF ST. PAUL, INC. A FRANCHISE EXTENSION TO MARCH 31, 2016 and Resolution 2015-21, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL OF THE GRANTEE. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 page 10 G) ARGENTA TRAIL REALIGNMENT Public Works Director John Mazzitello noted that there is a joint project between the City of Inver Grove Heights and Dakota County to potentially realign Argenta Trail between Highway 55 and Interstate 494. There are different alternatives being analyzed although the specific details are unknown. It is proposed that the Council consider providing comments to Dakota County and the City of Inver Grove Heights as this potential realignment is part of the overall plan for the Northwest Area Development concept. In 2010 Dakota County adopted the Regional Roadway System Visioning Study, which was looking at the whole northwest area of Inver Grove Heights and the northeast area of Eagan and how the transportation corridors would be altered for prospective developments in the future. Part of that study included what was referred to at the time as the Option E an interchange alignment on Interstate 494 located approximately one-half mile east of the Delaware Avenue Bridge. It is proposed that Mendota Heights recommend that Dakota County continue to plan regionally and provide for east-west connections between Robert Street and Dodd Road. still that Option E as was identified in the visioning study is still its first preference, showing an intersection east of Delaware Avenue. Mr. Scott Spade of Sunfish Lake was in attendance to answer questions from the Council. Mr. Spade and his team have been invol study for the transportation improvements. By City Council consensus, staff was directed to send a letter to Dakota County Transportation Group support of Option E, with a further request moving forward that the th County keep the City informed on any future development on 65andany contemplated ideas with respect to the improvements. NoCouncil vote was necessary. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS Assistant City Administrator Tamara Schutta made the following announcements: The Victoria Reconstruction Project open house has been postponed to March 4, 6:30 p.m. Recreation Program Coordinator Sloan Wallgren is working with School District 197 and Tri- district Community Education in Dakota County on programming for adults 50+. A meeting is schedule for Tuesday, March 31 at Mendota Elementary. They are requesting that individuals interested offer suggestions on what kinds of programs they would like to see offered. A survey The February edition of Heights Highlightswas mailed to residents on February 25. March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 8 page 11 COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Povolny wished good luck to the Saint Thomas Academy hockey team. Councilmember Norton echoed the good luck wishes to Saint Thomas Academy and wished good luck to Coach Langevin, who coaches Edina but is a Mendota Heights resident. Councilmember Norton also recognized an audience member, Mr. Thomas Chandler, a student at Heritage. He is working on his Boy Scout Merit Badge. Councilmember Petschel gave a shout out to staff as she thought this new issue of the Heights Highlights was magnificent. She loved the cover story on the PCN Companies. She also expressed her appreciation to Public Works Director John Mazzitello and Planner Nolan Wall for helping the middle school students with their project. She also noted that the online version of The Patch is a great resource for everything that is going on in the schools theatre events, music events, etc. Mayor Krebsbach noted the passing of two individuals who were active members of the community, George Zirnhelt \[Lilydale\] and Charles Toomey \[Bloomington\]. She also welcomed City Administrator Mark McNeill to his first City Council meeting. ADJOURN Councilmember Norton moved to adjourn. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 Mayor Krebsbach adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. ____________________________________ Sandra Krebsbach Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Lorri Smith City Clerk March 3, 2015 Mendota Heights City Council Page 9 page 12 5b. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Dave Dreelan, Assistant Fire Chief SUBJECT: February 2015 Fire Synopsis Fire Calls The department responded to 18 calls for the month. The majority of calls were classified as false alarms or as good intent calls. Five calls were residential in nature and four were commercial calls. Of the remaining calls, three were car fires, three were utility checks and one call was an EMS call. There were also two mutual aid calls to Eagan. One of the mutual aid calls was for a reported structure fire in a motel on Highway 55. Units from Mendota Heights were the first to arrive and initiated theinitial fire attack. Monthly Department Training The monthly department training was dedicated to satisfying most of our OSHA mandated training. Firefighters received training in the areas of Blood Borne Pathogens, Employee Right to Know, Pre Plans and Lock Out-Tag Out procedures. Monthly Squad Training The squad training for the month was Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and personal protective equipment training. Firefighters reviewed emergency procedures related to their SCBA such as low air emergencies, SCBA malfunctions, air consumption rates, and SCBA disentanglement procedures. MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT page 13 FEBRUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT FIRE CALLS NO. 15017-15034NUMBER OF CALLS:18 FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED:NUMBERSTRUCTURECONTENTSMISC.TOTALS TO DATE ACTUAL FIRES Structure - MH Commercial$0 Structure - MH Residential$0 Structure - Contract Areas$0 Vehicle - MH$0 Vehicle - Contract Areas$0 Grass/Brush/No Value MH Grass/Brush/No Value Contract TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES MEDICAL Assist 1$0$0$0 Extrication HAZARDOUS SITUATION FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS Spills/Leaks 2 Arcing/Shorting ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH)$0 Chemical Power Line Down MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS$0 FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction 1 MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS$0 Commercial Malfunction Unintentional - Commercial 1 MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE$0 Unintentional - Residential 1 Criminal BILLING FOR SERVICES GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare 3 AGENCYTHIS MONTHTO DATE Steam Mistaken for Smoke Carbon Monoxide Alarms 1MN/DOT$0 Other 6MILW. RR$0 2CNR RR$0 MUTUAL AID 18OTHERS: TOTAL CALLS $0 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATELAST YEAR $0$0 TOTALS: MENDOTA HEIGHTS 152934 MENDOTA 001 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH SUNFISH LAKE 122 LILYDALE 013INSPECTIONS34 OTHER 222 INVESTIGATIONS 183442 TOTAL RE-INSPECTION WORK PERFORMED HOURSTO DATELAST YEAR MEETINGS1.5 FIRE CALLS 354.5632.5937.5 MEETINGS 326267ADMINISTRATION14 DRILLS 130.5286.5344.5 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 407472SPECIAL PROJECTS3 SPECIAL ACTIVITY 266399.5835.75 ADMINISTATIVE 0052.5 TOTAL FIRE MARSHAL 52.59760 875.51551.52316.75REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS TOTALS page 14 5c. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Terry Blum, Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Purchase of aLawn Mower/Snow Blower for Parks BACKGROUND Public Works would like to purchase a new lawn mower/snow blower for the Parks Department. The new machine would replace a 1997 machine, which is 18 years old. This machine will be used for both cutting grass in the summer and blowing the snow off of hockey rinks and pedways in the winter. BUDGET IMPACT In the 2015Parks Department Budget, there is $37,000 budgeted to purchase a new lawn mower/snow blower. This new piece of equipment is a John Deer 1585 Terrain Cut mower with mower deck and snow blower with heated cab. Sharber and Sons of Rogers, MN have the state contract on this piece of equipment. The price with trade-in from Sharber & Sons is $37,892.70. Frontier Ag and Turf of Rosemount, MN submitted a quote for the same machine with trade in for the price of $34,000. Frontier Ag and Turf is $3,892.70 less than the state contract price from Sharber and Sons. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize a purchase order to be made to Frontier Ag and Turf of Rosemount, MN in the amount of $34,000 for the purchase of a John Deer 1585 TerrainCut Mower. If the City Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion authorizing staff to execute a purchase order to Frontier Ag and Turf of Rosemount, MN in the amount of $34,000 for the purchase of a John Deer 1585 TerrainCut Mower. page 15 5d. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, Council and City Administrator FROM: Mike Aschenbrener SUBJECT: Resolution 2015-25:Formally AcknowledgingReceipt of Gift ofTwo Remington 870 Shotguns BACKGROUND The city auditor has advised that Minnesota StateStatute 465.03 “Gifts to municipalities” requires all donations be acknowledged by resolution. This memo meets Minnesota State Statutory requirements. In 2014 the owner of McKay Enterprises learned that we were having problems obtaining less lethal shotguns. He offered to find them and beat the price we were authorized with a purchase order through Gander Mountain Tactical. Within a month he had 2 of the 5 in his shop. Shortly after Officer Patrick was killed,he called and stated the Remington 870’s would be a donation in Officer Patrick’s honor.When we received the new guns he was asked about obtaining two more guns in 2015 to complete the purchase, he again offered to get the guns and donate them. I recommend the City Council pass the attached resolution accepting the Remington 870 shotguns to be used by the department as less lethal options for the officers. Thank you letters will be sent to McKayEnterprisesafter the resolution has been passed. RECOMMENDATION Resolution 2015- If Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting 25: “FORMALLY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF GIFT OF TWO REMINGTON 870 SHOTGUNS.” page 16 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015 - 25 FORMALLY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF GIFT OF TWO REMINGTON 870 SHOTGUNS WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights desires to follow Minnesota Statute 465.03 “Gifts to municipalities”; and WHEREAS ,the Minnesota State Statute requires a resolution to accept gifts to municipalities; and WHEREAS, the City has previously acknowledged gifts with a resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights have duly considered this matter and wish to acknowledge the civic mindedness of citizens and officially recognize their donations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights accepts the donation of two Remington 870 shotguns to be used as a less lethal option from McKay Enterprises. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 17th day of March 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _________________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 17 5e. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Lorri Smith,CityClerk SUBJECT: Temporary On-Sale Liquor Licensefor St. Thomas Academy INTRODUCTION Pursuant to State Statutes and our City Code, no person shallsell or give away liquor without first having received a license. Temporary On-Sale Liquor licenses shall be granted only to clubs and charitable, religious or nonprofit organizations for the sale of intoxicating liquor. The licenses are subject to final approval by the Director of Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. DISCUSSION St. Thomas Academy,located at 949Mendota Heights Road, is planning to hold their annual Community Auction Galaat St. Thomas Academy on April 17 and 18, 2015.They have requested a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to allow for the sale of alcoholic beverages on th April 18 only, from 5:00 p.m. - 12:00 a.m.St. Thomas Academy hassubmitted acomplete application and acertificate of insurance for showing liquor liabilityfor the event.They will have security on duty while liquor is being served. It should be noted that Temporary On-Sale Liquor licenses have been issued in the past to St. Thomas Academy and other charitable, nonprofit and religious organizations within the city with no incidents or negative reports. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends the City Council approve a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for St. Thomas Academy for April 18, 2015subject to approval of the Director of Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. page 18 5f. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: John P. Maczko, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Firefighter Retirement BACKGROUND Firefighter Michelle (Mickey) Parker has announced her retirement effective March 31, 2015. Mickey becamea firefighter with the Mendota Heights Fire Department on September 17, 2002, and will retire after 12.5 years of service. Since joining the team, Mickey has been a very active member onthe fire department. She was a certified Firefighter II, trained to the Haz-Mat operational level and is a medical first responder. Mickey enjoyed the department and was very active in our education programs. Mickey was an 11 year participant in the annual three day South St Paul, West St Paul, and Mendota Heights Safety Camp. She served on the Fire Prevention Committee for 12 years, helping to organize our annual fire prevention activities and coordinate our school visits. This past year she chaired the committee and developed a resource manual to assist those who will follow in her footsteps. She served on the annual dance committee for three years and always was involved in adding the Mickey was also recognized as 2004for all of her efforts and involvement in helping to make the Fire Department better and help our residents learn how to stay safe. Mickey hopes to continue serving in the capacity of a Fire Reserve member. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the City Council accept with regret the retirement of Mickey Parker effective March 31, 2015. If council concurs with my recommendation, they should formally thank Mickey for her 12.5 years of service. page 19 5g. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tamara Schutta, Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator SUBJECT: Personnel Action Items Item 1: Successful Completion of Probationary Period, PT Police Support Specialist Lisa Brandt Effective March 7, 2015, Lisa Brandt has successfully completed her one-year probationary period as PT Police Support Specialist. Lisa is doing an outstanding job and is a perfect fit for this position.Lisa is a great additional to the city. City staff recommends that the City Council officially appoint Lisa Brandt to the position of regular, part-time Police Support Specialist, effective March 7, 2015. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approves the action requested above for Item one. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 20 5h. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Lorri Smith, City Clerk SUBJECT: Ordinance 474 Adopting Proposed Code Amendment for Fees BACKGROUND Title 9 of the City Code contains building regulations. Upon reviewby staff, it was discovered that a previous version of the Fee Schedule was contained in the Code. Since the Fee Schedule is updated annually by resolution, it is recommended the fees be removed from the Code. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION City staff is recommending the City Council pass a motion adoptingORDINANCE 474 AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 9-6-1, and approve the SUMMARY PUBLICATION. This ordinance requires a simple majority vote. th The summary publication requires a 4/5 vote of the Council. page 21 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 474 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-6-1 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, DAKOTA COUNTY, CONCERNING FEES The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Section 1. 9-6-1: FEES: A.Except as otherwise stated in this code, the fees for the various licenses, permits, services and functions rendered shall be paid in accordance with the City Fee Schedule, as adopted by resolution by the City Council. as follows: FEE SCHEDULE Building Permits 1 Building permits; total valuation: $1.00 to $500.00 $23.50 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $23.50 for the first $500.00 plus $3.05 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $69.25 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $391.25 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $643.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $993.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.15 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Other Inspections And Fees Plan review fee 55 percent of building permit fee. Similar plans, 25 percent of permit fee Inspections outside of normal $47.00 per hour business hours (minimum charge -2 hours) Reinspection fee: First reinspection $25.00 page 22 Each reinspection thereafter $35.00 per hour Inspections for which no fee is $35.00 per hour specifically 1 indicated (minimum charge - / 2 hour) Additional plan review required by $35.00 per hour changes, additions or revisions to approved plans 1 (minimum charge -/hour) 2 Investigation fee for work Double the permit fee commencing before permit issuance Fence permit $25.00 Roofing permit$25.00 Plumbing Permits Commercial permits 1 percent of value, minimum $50.00 Cost of job 1 percent of value, minimum $50.00 Residential permits New construction $50.00 plus $5.00 per fixture Bath addition $25.00 plus $5.00 per fixture Alterations and repairs 1 percent of value, minimum $25.00 2 Fixtures after rough in Rough in (not as part of new$5.00/fixture, minimum $25.00 construction) Water heater replacement 1 percent of value, minimum $25.00 2 Mechanical Permits New heating 1 percent of value, minimum $50.00 Air conditioning 1 percent of value, minimum $50.00 Gas piping $50.00 Alter or replacement: Residential 1 percent of value, minimum $25.00 2 Commercial 1 percent of value, minimum $50.00 Sewer And Water Permits Sewer $ 25 .00 Water 10 .00 Planning And Zoning Fees Variance: Residential $ 100 .00 Commercial 150 .00 Vacation 250 .00 Wetlands permit: Residential 135 .00 Commercial 175 .00 page 23 Critical area review 100 .00 Minor CAO review 50 .00 Zoning ordinance amendment 250 .00 Conditional use permit 350 .00 Rezoning 350 .00 CUP for PUD 500 .00 Concept plan review 250 .00 Subdivision 750 .00 Lot split 350 .00 Comprehensive plan amendment 750 .00 Park Dedication Fees Single-family residential $2,700.00 per dwelling unit Townhomes/duplexes/condos $2,700.00 per dwelling unit Apartments $2,700.00 per dwelling unit Office/industrial property 10 percent of current market value of the unimproved land as determined by the county assessor Commercial 10 percent of current market value of the unimproved land as determined by the county assessor Notes: B. 1. Permit fee refund policy: The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with the building code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. 2. $15.00 or 1 percent of cost of improvement, whichever is greater, if it does not require modification to electric or gas service, has a total cost of $500.00 or less, excluding fixture or appliance cost, and if it is improved, installed or replaced by the homeowner or a licensed contractor. (Ord. 388, 1-6-2004) Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this seventeenth day of March, 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ___________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 24 SUMMARY PUBLICATION CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ORDINANCE 474 AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 9-6-1 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, MN ordains: ThatCity Code Section 9-6-1: Feesis hereby amended by deleting the Fee Schedule included in this section and now readsthat the fees are set in the Fee Schedule adopted annually by resolution of the City Council. The complete text of Ordinance 474 may be obtained at City Hall or from the City’s website at www.mendota-heights.com . th Adopted/ordained this 17 day of March, 2015. CITY COUNCIL OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS /s/Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor Attest: /s/ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 26 5j. page 27 5k. page 28 page 29 page 30 page 31 page 32 page 33 page 34 page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 5l. J & A Mechanical, LLC Majeski Plumbing & Heating A.R.M.M. Construction J & A Mechanical, LLC Majeski Plumbing & Heating, Inc DeMars Signs, Inc Wednesday, March 11, 2015Page 1 of 1 page 39 8a. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance Applications at 731 Woodridge Drive BACKGROUND The applicants are seekinga Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variances as part of a proposed slope repair project.A detailed analysis of the applicable Code standards relating to each specific request is included in the attached staff report. The subject parcel is located within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area and requires City Council approval for the proposed projectbefore a building permit or zoning approval can be issued. At the March 3 meeting, the Council granted the applicants’ request to conduct a public hearing at the March 17 Council meeting in order to expedite the review process. The proposed slope repair project includes construction of a concrete retaining wall,associated soil stabilization activities,and vegetation removalwithin the approximately 75-foot by 45-foot impacted area above Highway 13 on the applicants’ property. In addition to the required notice to surrounding property owners, the application materials were also sent to several government agencies for review and comment. If approved, the applicants’ engineering consultant will submit final plans for review prior to approval of a building permit. The construction project would commence as soonas possible after the required approvals are obtained from all necessary permitting agencies. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council conduct a public hearing and consider action to approve the requests included in the application package. If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting RESOLUTION 2015- 23 APPROVING CRITICAL AREA PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS AT 731 WOODRIDGE DRIVE. Thismatterrequires a simple majority vote. page 40 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015-23 RESOLUTION APPROVING CRITICAL AREAPERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCEAPPLICATIONS AT 731 WOODRIDGE DRIVE WHEREAS ,Eileen O’Shaughnessy and Art Perlman have applied for a critical areapermit, conditional use permit,and variances to construct a retaining wall and repair the slope of their rear yard at 731 Woodridge Drive as proposed in Planning Case 2015-06 and described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights City Council granted the property owners’ request to conduct the public hearing before the City Council in order to expedite the review process; and WHEREAS ,the Mendota Heights City Council held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting on March 17, 2015. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the critical area permit, conditional use permit, and varianceapplicationrequests as proposed in Planning Case 2015-06 are hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1.The proposed project meets the purpose and intent of the Critical Area Overlay District Chapter of the City Code. 2.The proposed project is necessary to restore and stabilize the slope to prevent future failure in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community and surrounding land. 3.The height and construction materials of the proposed retaining wall, and soil disturbance required for its construction, are necessary in order to ensure stability of the slope. 4.Visual impacts of the proposed retaining wall will be mitigated by landscaping. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the critical area permit, conditional use permit, and variance applicationrequestsas proposed in Planning Case 2015-06 are hereby approved with the following conditions: 1.Building and grading permits are approved by the City prior to construction of the proposed project. 2.Necessary permits are obtained from the Minnesota Department of Transportation prior to construction of the proposed project. 3.A Traffic Control Plan for Highway 13 is submitted along with the Building Permit application and approved by MNDOT prior to construction. 4.Construction of the proposed project shall be in compliance with the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. 5.Vine plugs are planted at the base of the proposed retaining wall. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this seventeenth day of March, 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _____________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 41 DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2015-06 Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance Applications APPLICANT: Eileen O’Shaughnessy and Art Perlman PROPERTY ADDRESS: 731Woodridge Drive ZONING/GUIDED: R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential ACTION DEADLINE: May 4, 2015 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants areseekinga Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variancesas part of a proposed slope repair project. The subject parcel is located within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area and requires City Council approval for the proposed projectbefore a building permit or zoning approval can be issued. BACKGROUND As a result of a landslide event onJune 19, 2014, an approximately 75-foot by 45-foot portion ofthe subject parcel’s rear yardslid onto Highway 13. According to the applicants’ engineering consultant, if left unaddressed, the slope is susceptible to future failure. As discussed in the attached letterof intent, the applicants have been working to address the situation since that time. The proposed slope repair project willinclude construction of a retaining walland associated soil stabilization, which requires approval of a critical area permitand accompanying applications. At the March 3, 2015 meeting, the applicantsrequested the City Council grant an exemption from Planning Commission review so that consideration of the required applications could be expedited. The request was granted and the required public hearing will be conducted at the March 17 meeting. ANALYSIS Critical Area Permit The purpose and intent of the Critical Area Overlay District is to: Title 12-3-2: “…prevent and mitigate irreversible damage to this unique state, local, regional and national resource to promote orderly development of the residential, commercial, industrial, recreational and public areas, to preserve and enhance its values to the public and protect and preserve the system as an essential element in the city's transportation, sewer and water and recreational systems…” page 42 Specific to this case, the proposed slope repair project is necessary to prevent and mitigate further damage to public and private property in the impactedarea surrounding the subject parcel. Due tothe proposed scope of the project, a critical areapermit isrequired for grading and construction of theretaining wall and vegetation removal in the impacted area. Regarding grading and construction of the proposed retaining wall, the following Code standards apply: Title 12-3-14(A): “The construction of any building or structure, or the alteration of any land consisting of more than one hundred (100) cubic yards of fill or excavation shall require a critical area permit from the city council.” According to the applicants’ engineering consultant, approximately 1,000 cubic yardsof fill are proposed as part of the slope repair project. Title 12-3-9(E): Standards For Grading And Filling: With the exception of approved mining and mineral extraction operations, grading, filling, excavating or otherwise changing the topography landward of the ordinary high water mark shall not be conducted without a permit. A permit may be issued only if: 1. Earth moving, erosion, vegetative cutting and the destruction of natural amenities is minimized; 2. The smallest amount of ground is exposed for as short a time as feasible; 3. Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and permanent ground cover, such as sod, is planted; 4. Methods to prevent erosion and trap sediment are employed; 5. Fill is established to accepted engineering standards. According to the City Engineer, the amount of disturbance was dictated by the June landslide and the project is to restore an already disturbed area. Compliance with conditions 2, 3, and 4 above will be determined by the required Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and NPDES Permit for construction. In addition, the proposed fill will be certified by the geotechnical engineer completing the final plans. According to the applicants’ consulting engineer, the backfill will be free-draining sand with a layer of topsoil. In addition, the proposed project willinclude a groundwater collection system, hydro-seeding, and turf reinforcing mats (TRM) for planting and erosion control. Regarding the proposed vegetation removal, the following Code standard applies: Title 12-3-9(F)(3): The selective cutting of trees greater than six inches (6") in diameter measured at a point two feet (2') above ground level shall be allowed by permit when the cutting is appropriately spaced and staged so that a continuous natural cover is maintained. The landslide left the existing dwelling somewhat exposed, since all trees and vegetation in the impacted area of the slope slid down onto Highway 13. According to the applicants,some existing vegetation on the edges of the impacted area may have to be removed as part of the proposed project. Further examination of the existing vegetation’s long-term viabilitywill be conducted during construction. At this time, it is unclear if certain vegetation will survive after grading and filling occurs in the impacted area. In order to allow for necessary and limited vegetation removal as part of the proposed project, staff recommended the request be included as apart of the critical area permit application. As part of a future project, the applicants intend to plant trees and/or shrubs on the slope above the wall, as well as replacethe lilac shrubs currently growing along the bluff line with evergreen medium-sized shrubs/trees.In addition, hydro-seeding the proposed project will encourage re-growthof continuous natural groundcover in the impacted area. page 43 Fall protection on top of the retaining wall is not included as part of the proposed project, and, according to the Building Official, is not required. If a fence is desiredin the future,it would require a separate critical area permitto be considered at a later date. Conditional Use Permit Due to the proposed scope of the project, a conditional use permit is required and the following Code standards apply in this case: Title 12-3-14(B): Any affected activity requiring a critical area permit on slopes greater than eighteen percent (18%) but less than forty percent (40%) shall require a conditional use permit, and shall be required to meet the procedural and performance requirements of this section. Conditional use permits under this chapter shall be considered as follows: . . . . 2. On lots where a principal building was present as of September 1, 2006, only accessory or incidental structures shall be allowed under this clause on slopes greater than eighteen percent (18%). Examples of such structures include fences, retaining walls, landscape elements, decks and patios, or similar structures. The proposed project will disturb slopes between 18% and 40% and the existing principal building was present prior to 2006. Therefore, a conditional use permit is required as part of the application package for construction of the proposed retaining walland associated soil stabilization activities. In addition, the following findings are required for conditional use permit approval in the Critical Area: Title 12-3-16: Conditional use permits may be granted after an application process and a public hearing according to the provisions of section 12-1L-6of this title. A conditional use permit may be granted only when the following findings are made, in addition to those conditions listed in this zoning ordinance: A.The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the critical area order and the city's comprehensive plan; B.The proposed use is compatible with uses in theimmediate vicinity; and C.The proposed use is allowed under the applicable ordinances of the city of Mendota Heights. Under the circumstances surrounding this case, the proposed project meets all three required findingsabove. Variances Due to the proposed scope of the project, three separate variance requests are included as part of the application package: Planning Case 2015-06 Variance Requests Variance RequestCode SectionStandardProposed Retaining wall height12-3-9(A)(2)(d)(1)5 feet 14-17 feet Precast or cast in place Precast or cast in place Retaining wall materials12-3-9(A)(2)(d)(3) concrete are prohibitedconcrete Construction on slopes No construction on slopes Constructionon slopes 12-3-14(C) over 40%over 40% over 40% Regarding the height and materials for the proposed retaining wall, the following standards apply: Title 12-3-9(A)(2)(d): All structures other than buildings and roadway surfaces, but including retaining walls, shall meet the following design requirements: (1) Retaining walls or terrace contours shall not exceed five feet (5') in height. page 44 (2) Construction shall be of native stone or wood. Other materials may be permitted by the city where such materials are necessary to preserve the stability ofthe slope, and where the materials are designed with a natural color and texture. (3) The use of gabbions, pilings, tiebacks, metal retaining walls and precast or cast in place concrete retaining walls is specifically prohibited. (4) The minimum horizontal spacing between terraces and retaining walls shall be twenty feet (20'). The proposed retaining wall isapproximately 14-17 feet tall,which does not meet the 5-foot-high construction standard. According to the applicants’ consulting engineer, in orderto create a stable slope extending from the failure crestat the bluff lineto the top of the wall, it needs to be between 14 feet and17 feet tall. The proposed retaining wall will be constructedof concrete, either as cast-in-place or precast and assembled on-site; both of which areprohibited materials for such a structure in the Critical Area.The final construction technique will be analyzed as part of the building permit application. The use of concrete, as opposed to native stone or woodrequired by the Code, is necessary to ensure the proper soil stabilization and drainage to adequately prevent future slope failure. Regarding the proposed construction, including soil disturbance, on slopes over 40%, the following standards apply: Title 12-3-14(C): No Construction On Certain Slopes: No construction shall be permitted on slopes greater than forty percent (40%), nor within forty feet (40') of any bluff line where slopes exceed forty percent (40%). Based on the existing condition prior to the slope failure on the subject parcel, slopes in excess of 40% were present in the impacted area. Due to unsafe conditions, a topographic survey of post-landslideslopeswas not completed. In order to construct the proposed project, slopes over 40% mustbe disturbed in order to be repaired. According to the Grading Plan, the finished grade of the impacted area is proposed to be approximately 33% or less;therefore post-construction grades will be “flatter” than the pre-landslide condition.The proposed construction activities will take place below the bluff line; thereforethe setback provision does not apply in this case. When considering the variances fromthe applicable Code standards referenced above, the City is required to find that: 1.The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The proposed project meets the purpose and intent of the Critical Area Overlay District and Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the purpose of the proposed project is to restore the slope and protect the surrounding public and private properties from further damage, which is a reasonable use of the property. 2.The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the propertywhich are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations; The soil composition of the existing steep slopes above Highway 13on the subject parcelis a unique circumstance not created by the applicants. In addition, a series of weather events contributed to the slope failurein June 2014. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Code in order to adequately repair the slope and protect it from future failure. page 45 3.The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. The rear yards of the properties along the south side of Woodridge Drive feature a natural bluff edge and vegetated slope above Highway 13 overlooking the Mississippi River Valley. The slope failure on the subject parcel caused significant vegetation loss on the exposed soils. The proposed project will restore the slope and include hydro-seeding to promote rapid natural vegetation regrowth in the impacted area. In an effort to mitigate the visual impacts of the proposed retaining wall, vine plugs will be planted at the base of the wall. In addition, another retaining wall was constructed on private propertynorth of the subject parcel as part of a previous slope repair project above Highway 13. INTERAGENCY REVIEW In addition to the public and private property owners within 350 feet of the subject parcel, public hearing notices and application materials were sent to the following agencies for review and comment: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) MNDNR commented that this appears to be an unfortunate example of why bluff setbacks are so important. However, the need to repair the slope isdemonstrated by thorough engineering analysis and past efforts have diverted stormwater to address upslope issues. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) MNDOT indicated the need to review final plans showing all impacts to theright-of-way anddrainage, which will be supplied as part the building permit application after final design is completed. In addition, they advised the applicants of the necessary permitting requirements prior to construction of the proposed project. City of St. Paul – Parks and Recreation Department The City of St. Paul commented thatit’s unknown if the proposed retaining wall would be seen from Lilydale Regional Park, but still encouraged the use of landscaping to mask the wall. Their other comments related to stormwater management and additional landscaping will be considered during final designof the proposed project. In addition, they recognize the need to stabilize the slope to reduce the potential for sediment entering Pickerel Lake. Attached is a copy of their comments. City of Lilydale – As of March 12, no comments had been received from the City of Lilydale on this case. ALTERNATIVES 1.Approval of the Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance requests for the proposed slope repair project based on the attached findings of fact, with the conditions below. OR 2.Denial of the Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance requestsfor the proposed slope repair project based on the finding that the application does not meet the policies and standards of the Critical Area Overlay District. OR 3.Table the request. page 46 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance requests for the proposed slope repairproject based on the attached findings of fact(Alternative 1), with the following conditions: 1.Building and grading permits are approved bythe City prior to constructionof the proposed project. 2.Necessary permits are obtained fromthe Minnesota Department of Transportation prior to construction of the proposed project. 3.A Traffic Control Plan for Highway 13 is submitted along with the Building Permit application and approved by MNDOT prior to construction. 4.Construction of the proposed projectshall be in compliance with the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. 5.Vine plugs are planted at the base of the proposed retaining wall. ACTION REQUESTED Following a public hearing, if the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, it should pass a motion adoptingRESOLUTION 2015-23 APPROVING CRITICAL AREA PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS AT 731 WOODRIDGE DRIVE. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1.City of St. Paul comments 2.Aerial Site Map 3.Planning Applications, including supporting materials page 47 FINDINGS OF FACT FORAPPROVAL Critical Area Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance requests for Slope Repair 731 Woodridge Drive The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1.The proposed project meets the purpose and intent of the Critical Area Overlay District Chapter of the City Code. 2.The proposed project is necessary to restore and stabilize the slope to prevent future failure in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community and surrounding land. 3.The height and construction materialsof the proposed retaining wall, and soil disturbance required for its construction, are necessary in order to ensure stability of the slope. 4.Visual impactsof the proposed retainingwall will be mitigated by landscaping. page 48 From:Messer, Alice (CI-StPaul) To:Nolan Wall Subject:FW: Planning Case 2015-06 - 731 Woodridge Drive Slope Repair Project for City of St. Paul Review Date:Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:30:34 AM Hello Nolan – Thank you for notifying the City regarding construction of the proposed 17’ high retaining wall along Hwy 13 ROW. The proposed retaining wall would be constructed from H-piling with concrete panels. The City is unsure if the wall would be visible from park property. Existing bluff vegetation would most likely screen the wall from park visitors in Lilydale Regional Park. The wall would be visible from Hwy 13. I did not see storm water information included in the application and it is unclear on where discharge from the drain tile will go in large storm events. As the downstream property owner, the City requests that the storm water design considers the bluff environment of Lilydale Regional Park. Finally, it is in the City interest to have slopes stabilized as it will reduce the potential for sediment entering Pickerel Lake. The City encourages the property owner to utilize plantings and vines to mask the retaining wall as stated in the application. It is unclear if more “bio-engineered” solutions are appropriate to address slope stability issues at this site. Thank you, Alice Alice Messer Landscape Architect City of Saint Paul Department of Parks and Recreation th 400 City Hall Annex, 25 West 4 Street Saint Paul, MN 55102 (651) 266-6412 direct From: Nolan Wall \[mailto:nolanw@mendota-heights.com\] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 9:31 AM To: Hahm, Michael (CI-StPaul); Korum, Kathy (CI-StPaul) Cc: John R. Mazzitello Subject: Planning Case 2015-06 - 731 Woodridge Drive Slope Repair Project for City of St. Paul Review Mr. Hahm/Ms. Korum – Attached is an application for a Critical Area Permit for a slope stabilization project at 731 Woodridge Drive, which is across Highway 13 from property owned by the City of St. Paul above Pickerel Lake and Lilydale Regional Park. The request is to construct a retaining wall and associated soil stabilization activities. The conditional use permit is to disturb slopes between 18-40% and the variances are for the materials and height of the retaining wall and to disturb slopes over 40% - all of which are required based on a preliminary review of the materials and the scope of the proposed project. page 49 In an effort to expedite the review process, the City Council approved a request to hold the public hearing at the March 17 meeting and bypass Planning Commission review; a process the City has allowed in the past for similar slope repair projects in the vicinity. As a result, we respectfully request any comments the City may want to provide be received by Wednesday, March 11 in order to include in the City Council packet. The surrounding property owners have been noticed, including the City’s Parks and Recreation Department, in compliance with the Code requirements. Please let me know if another staff member would be the appropriate contact for communication on similar permit applications. Please contact us with any questions regarding the proposed project, Nolan Nolan Wall, AICP Planner City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 – City Hall 651.255.1142 – Direct www.mendota-heights.com page 50 Planning Case 2015-06 City of 731 Woodbridge Drive Mendota 040 Heights Date: 3/11/2015 SCALE IN FEET 727 731 754 W OODR IDGE DR 744 734 Aerometrics GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. page 51 ,¤³³¤± ®¥ )­³¤­³ #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  0¤±¬¨³ȝ#®­£¨³¨®­ « 5²¤ 0¤±¬¨³ Request -¸ §´²¡ ­£Ǿ !±³ 0¤±«¬ ­Ǿ  ­£ )  ±¤ ²¤¤ª¨­¦   #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  0¤±¬¨³  ­£ 6 ±¨ ­¢¤Ǿ  ­£   #®­£¨³¨®­ « 5²¤ 0¤±¬¨³ ¨­ ®±£¤± ³® ¢®­²³±´¢³   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ ««  ³ ³§¤ ±¤ ± ®¥ ®´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸ ³® ±¤¯ ¨±  ­£ ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¤ ³§¤ ¯®±³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ³§ ³ ¥ ¨«¤£ ®­ *´­¤ ΐΘǾ ΑΏΐΓ  ²   ±¤²´«³ ®¥ ³§¤ ´­´²´ ««¸ ¶¤³ ²¯±¨­¦  ­£ ³¶® « ±¦¤ ²³®±¬²ȁ 7¤ «¨µ¤  ³ ΖΒΐ 7®®£±¨£¦¤ $±¨µ¤ȁ /´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸ ¨² ¨­¢«´£¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  #®±±¨£®±Ǿ  ­£ ¨² ²¨³´ ³¤£ ®­ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ®µ¤±«®®ª¨­¦ ³§¤ ±¨µ¤± µ ««¤¸ȁ )³ ¨²   ¡¤ ´³¨¥´« «®¢ ³¨®­ ¶¨³§ ²¶¤¤¯¨­¦ µ¨¤¶²  ­£  ­  ¡´­£ ­¢¤ ®¥ ¶¨«£«¨¥¤Ǿ ¨­¢«´£¨­¦ ¶¨«£ ³´±ª¤¸²Ǿ ¡ «£ ¤ ¦«¤²Ǿ ¯¨«¤ ³¤£ ¶®®£¯¤¢ª¤±²Ǿ £¤¤±  ­£ ®³§¤± ²¯¤¢¨¤² ¢®¬¬®­ ³® ´±¡ ­  ­£ ²´¡´±¡ ­  ±¤ ²ȁ 4§¤ ±¤ ± ®¥ ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸ ²«®¯¤² ²³¤¤¯«¸ £®¶­ ³® ³§¤ ²³ ³¤ (¨¦§¶ ¸ ΐΒ  ­£ ¨² ­ ³´± ««¸ ¶®®£¤£ ¶¨³§   ¬¨· ®¥ £¤¢iduous  ­£ ¤µ¤±¦±¤¤­ ³±¤¤²Ǿ ²§±´¡²  ­£ ®³§¤± µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ȁ 4§¤ ±¨µ¤± µ ««¤¸ µ¨¤¶²  ­£ ­ ³´± « ¤­µ¨±®­¬¤­³  ±¤ ¶§ ³ £±¤¶ ´² ³® ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸ȁ 3®®­  ¥³¤± ¡´¸¨­¦ ®´± §®´²¤Ǿ ³§®´¦§Ǿ ¶¤ ±¤ «¨¹¤£ ³§ ³ ±´­®¥¥ ¶ ³¤± ¥±®¬ ³§¤ ­¤¨¦§¡®±¨­¦ ´¯§¨«« ¯±®¯¤±³¨¤² ¶ ²  ­ ¨²²´¤ ³§ ³ ¶¤ § £ ³® £¤ « ¶¨³§ȁ 3³¤µ¤ +«¤¨­Ǿ   ²¤­¨®± ¤­¦¨­¤¤±  ­£ §¸£±®«®¦¨²³ ¶¨³§ " ±± %­¦¨­¤¤±¨­¦Ǿ £¤µ¨²¤£   ¯« ­ ³® ¢®­³±®« ³§¤ ¥«®¶ ®¥ ²³®±¬ ¶ ³¤±Ǿ ¡®³§ ¥±®¬ ´¯§¨««  ­£ ¥±®¬ ®¥¥ ³§¤ ±®®¥Ǿ ¢§ ­­¤«¨­¦ ³§¤ ¥«®¶  ¶ ¸ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ §®´²¤  ­£ ¯±¤µ¤­³¨­¦ ¨³ ¥±®¬ ¦®¨­¦ ®µ¤± ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ «¨­¤ ¨­ ®±£¤± ³® ¬¨­¨¬¨¹¤ ¤±®²¨®­ȁ /­¢¤ ³§¤ ¯« ­ ¶ ² ¨¬¯«¤¬¤­³¤£ ¶¤ § £ ­® ¥´±³§¤± ²³®±¬ ¶ ³¤± ¯±®¡«¤¬² ´­³¨« « ²³ *´­¤Ȍ² ±¤¢®±£ ± ¨­¥ ««ȁ /­ *´­¤ ΐΘǾ 2014Ǿ  ¥³¤±  ­ ¨­¢±¤£¨¡«¤  ¬®´­³ ®¥ ²¯±¨­¦ ± ¨­  ­£ ²­®¶ ¬¤«³Ǿ   « ±¦¤ ²³®±¬ ®¢¢´±±¤£ ³§ ³ ¢ ´²¤£   « ­£²«¨£¤ ®­ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ²«®¯¤Ǿ £¤¯®²¨³¨­¦   ¦±¤ ³ £¤ « ®¥ ²®¨«  ­£ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ®­³® (¨¦§¶ ¸ ΐΒȁ Luckily ­® ®­¤ ¶ ² ¨­©´±¤£Ǿ ¡´³ ¶¤ ¶¤±¤ «¤¥³ ¶¨³§   ²¨³´ ³¨®­ ³§ ³ § £ ³® ¡¤  ££±¤²²¤£ ³® ¤­²´±¤ ³§ ³ ¥´±³§¤± ²«¨£¨­¦ ¶®´«£ ­®³ ®¢¢´±ȁ !³³ ¢§¤£  ±¤ ¯§®³®² ®¥ ³§¤ ²«¨£¤  ±¤  ³ ª¤­  ¥³¤± -­$/4 § £ ±¤¬®µ¤£ ³§¤ ²®¨«  ­£ £¤¡±¨² ³§ ³ ¢®µ¤±¤£ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ȁ 4§¤ landslide area ¨²  ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ 75 ¥¤¤³ ¶¨£¤  ­£ ±®´¦§«¸ ΓΔ ¥¤¤³ ¨­ ¤«¤µ ³¨®­ȁ )³ ¤­¢®¬¯ ²²¤² ¡®³§ ®´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸  ­£ -­$/4Ȍ² (¨¦§¶ ¸ ΐΒ ±¨¦§³ ®¥ ¶ ¸ ¯±®¯¤±³¸Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ run²  «®­¦ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸Ǿ  ­£ ¬ ª¤² ´¯  «¬®²³ ®­¤ ³§¨±£ ®¥ ³§¤ ¥ ¨«¤£ ²«®¯¤ ²´±¥ ¢¤  ±¤ ȁ 3®®­  ¥³¤± ³§¤ « ­£²«¨£¤ ®¢¢´±±¤£ ¶¤ ¶¤±¤ ¢ ´³¨®­¤£ ¡¸ -­$/4Ȍ² 3®´³§ -¤³±® !±¤  - ­ ¦¤± ³® ¶ ¨³ ´­³¨« ¶¤ ª­¤¶ ¶§ ³  ¢³¨®­ ³§¤¸ ¶®´«£ ³ ª¤ ¡¤¥®±¤ ¯« ­­¨­¦  ­¸ ¶®±ª ®¥ ®´± ®¶­ ³® £¤ « ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¥ ¨«´±¤Ǿ ²¨­¢¤  ­¸ ¥¨· ¶®´«£ ­¤¤£ ³® ¡¤  ­ ¨­³¤¦± ³¤£ appro ¢§ȁ )­ *´«¸Ǿ -­$/4 ¯±®¯®²¤£ ³® ¡´¨«£   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« on ³§¤ ±¨¦§³ ®¥ ¶ ¸ ¯±®¯¤±³¸Ǿ  ­£ ²´¡²¤°´¤­³«¸  ¡ ­£®­¤£ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³Ǿ ²³ ³¨­¦ ³§ ³ ³§¤¸ £¨£­Ȍ³ § µ¤ ¤­®´¦§ ¦¤®³¤¢§­¨¢ « £ ³  ³® ¡¤ ¢®¬¥®±³ ¡«¤ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¶ ««  ² ¢®­¢¤¨µ¤£ȁ 3§®±³«¸  ¥³¤±Ǿ ¶¤ ®¡³ ¨­¤£  ­£ ¯±¤²¤­³¤£ ³® ³§¤¬   ¯±®¯®² « ¥±®¬ '3) Ȩ'¤®²³ ¡¨«¨¹ ³¨®­ )­³¤±­ ³¨®­ «ȩ ¤¬¯«®¸¨­¦ ²®¨« ­ ¨«¨­¦ ¥®± ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¨­¦ ³§¤ ¤­³¨±¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ¶®´«£ § µ¤ ¨­µ®«µ¤£   ©®¨­³ ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ 7¤ «¤ ±­¤£ ¨­ ¬¨£- 3¤¯³¤¬¡¤± ³§ ³ -­$/4 ¶ ² ­®³ ¶¨««¨­¦ ³® ´­£¤±³ ª¤ ³§¨² ¢®«« ¡®± ³¨®­Ǿ  ­£ § £ ­® ¥´±³§¤± page 52 ¯« ­² ³® ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¤ ³§¤¨± ¯®±³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ¥ ¨«¤£ ²«®¯¤ȁ 4§¤¸ £¨£ ­®³ ²§ ±¤ ¶¨³§ ´²  ­¸ £ ³  ³§ ³ ²´¯¯®±³¤£ ³§¤¨± decision. W¤ ¶¤±¤ ¥®±³´­ ³¤Ǿ ¡¤¢ ´²¤ ®¥ ®´± ¯±¤µ¨®´² ±¤« ³¨®­²§¨¯Ǿ ³® ¡¤  ¡«¤ ³® ¢®­³± ¢³ ¶¨³§ " ±± %­¦¨­¤¤±¨­¦ ³®  £µ¨²¤ ´² ¦®¨­¦ ¥®±¶ ±£ȁ .®­¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ®³§¤± ¤­¦¨­¤¤±¨­¦ ¥¨±¬² ¶¤ § £ ¢®­³ ¢³¤£ ¶¤±¤ ¶¨««¨­¦ ³® ¶®±ª ¶¨³§   ±¤²¨£¤­³¨ « ¢«¨¤­³ȁ "¤¦¨­­¨­¦ ¨­ /¢³®¡¤±Ǿ ³§¤¸ ¢®­£´¢³¤£ ¤·³¤­²¨µ¤ ¦¤®³¤¢§­¨¢ « ¤·¯«®± ³¨®­²Ǿ  ­ «¸¹¨­¦ ³§¤ £ ³  ³®  ²²¤²² ³§¤ ±¨²ª ®¥ ¥´±³§¤± ²«¨£¨­¦  ­£ ³® ¯±®¯®²¤ ¯®²²¨¡«¤ ²®«´³¨®­²ȁ 4§¤¨± ¨­µ¤²³¨¦ ³¨®­² ¨­¢«´£¤£ ±¤¢®­­ ¨²² ­¢¤Ǿ ²¤¨²¬¨¢ Ȩ¦¤®¯§¸²¨¢ «ȩ ³¤²³¨­¦Ǿ ²®¨« ¡®±¨­¦sǾ  ­£ « ¡®± ³®±¸ ³¤²³¨­¦ȁ !¥³¤±  ­ «¸¹¨­¦ ³§¤ £ ³ Ǿ " ±±Ȍ² ¤­¦¨­¤¤±² ¢®­¢«´£¤£ ³§ ³ ³§¤±¤ ¨²   ±¨²ª ®¥ ¥´±³§¤± ²«¨£¨­¦  ³ ³§¤ ² ¬¤ ²¨³¤Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ¢®´«£ ³§±¤ ³¤­ ³§¤ ¨­³¤¦±¨³¸ ®¥ ®´± §®´²¤Ǿ  ­£ ®¡µ¨®´²«¸ ³§¤ ² ¥¤³¸ ®¥ ³§®²¤ ´²¨­¦ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ ¡¤«®¶ȁ 4§¤¸ ²³±®­¦«¸  £µ¨²¤£ ³§ ³ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¡¤ ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¤£ȁ )­ ¬¨£-.®µ¤¬¡¤± " ±± ¯±¤²¤­³¤£ ¥®´± ¢®­¢¤¯³´ «  ¯¯±® ¢§¤² ³® ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¨­¦ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ¨­¢«´£¤£ ²®¨« ­ ¨«¨­¦Ǿ ¥®± ¶§¨¢§ ¶¤  «±¤ £¸ § £   ¬®£¨¥¨¤£ £¤²¨¦­ ¥±®¬ '3)ȁ !³ ®´± requestǾ ³§¤¸ ¥´±³§¤± developed ³¶® ®¥ ³§¤ ®³§¤± conceptsǾ ±¤²´«³¨­¦ ¨­ ¯±¤«¨¬¨­ ±¸ £¤²¨¦­²  ­£ ¢®²³ ¤²³¨¬ ³¤²ȁ 4§¨² ¶ ²  ¢¢®¬¯«¨²§¤£ ´²¨­¦¦¤®³¤¢§­¨¢ « ¢®¬¯´³¤± ¬®£¤«¨­¦ ®¥ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ³§ ³ ¶®´«£ ±¤²´«³ ¥±®¬  ­®³§¤± ¥ ¨«´±¤Ǿ  ­£ ³§¤­ ¨³¤± ³¨µ¤ ¬®£¤«¨­¦ ®¥ ¤ ¢§ £¤²¨¦­ ³®  ¢§¨¤µ¤ ³§¤ ­¤¢¤²² ±¸ ¥ ¢³®± ®¥ ² ¥¤³¸ȁ "¸ ¬¨£-* ­´ ±¸ ¶¤ ³§¤­ § £ ³§±¤¤ ®¯³¨®­² ³® ¢§®®²¤ among. 4§¨² ¶ ² ­®³   £¤¢¨²¨®­ ³® ¡¤ ³ ª¤­ «¨¦§³«¸Ǿ ¦¨µ¤­ ¶§ ³ ¨²  ³ ²³ ª¤ȁ !¥³¤± ¬´¢§ ¢®­²¨£¤± ³¨®­  ­£ ¢®­²´«³ ³¨®­ ¶¨³§ " ±±Ǿ ³§¤ ²®«´³¨®­ ¶¤ ¢§®²¤ ¶ ² ³§¤ ¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­ ®¥   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ ««Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ¡´¨«³ ®­ ®´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸Ǿ ©´²³  ¡®µ¤ ³§¤ (¨¦§¶ ¸ ΐΒ ±¨¦§³ ®¥ ¶ ¸ property «¨­¤ȁ /¥ ³§¤ ³§±¤¤ ¯®²²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤²Ǿ ³§¤ ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« ®¥¥¤±¤£ ³§¤ ¦±¤ ³¤²³ ¡¤­¤¥¨³ ¨­ ³§ ³ ¨³Ȁ ΐȁ stabil¨¹¤£ ¡®³§ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ¤£¦¤  ­£ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ Αȁ § £ " ±±Ȍ² ¤·³¤­²¨µ¤  ­ «¸²¨² ²´¯¯®±³¨­¦ ¨³Ǿ Βȁ £¨±¤¢³«¸ £¤ «³ ¶¨³§ ¦±®´­£ ¶ ³¤± ³§ ³ ¢®­³±¨¡´³¤£ ³® ³§¤ *´­¤ ΐΘ ¥ ¨«´±¤Ǿ  ­£ Γȁ  ««®¶¤£ ¥®± ³§¤ ¯« ­³¨­¦ ®¥ ³±¤¤²  ­£ȝ®± ²§±´¡² ®­ ³§¤ ±¤²´«³¨­¦ ²«®¯¤ ¨­  ££¨³¨®­ ³® ²¤¤£¨­¦ ¥®± ±¤-vegetation. .¤¨³§¤± ®¥ ³§¤ ®³§¤± ³¶® ®¯³¨®­² ¯±®µ¨£¤£  «« four ®¥ ³§¤²¤ benefits. 4§¤ ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« ³§ ³ ¶¤  ±¤ ²¤¤ª¨­¦ ¯¤±¬¨²²¨®­ ³® ¡´¨«£ ¨²   ¯¨«¤  ­£ ¢®­¢±¤³¤ « ¦¦¨­¦ ¶ ««Ǿ  ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΖȌ §¨¦§  ­£ ΖΗȌ ¶¨£¤—¤ ¢§ ¤­£ ³ ¯¤±¨­¦ ¡ ¢ª ¨­³® ³§¤ ²«®¯¤—¶¨³§ ¦± ­´« ± ¡ ¢ª¥¨««Ǿ   ¦±®´­£¶ ³¤± ¢®««¤¢³¨®­ ²¸²³¤¬ ¡¤§¨­£ ³§¤ ¶ ««Ǿ   ¢« ¸ ¢ ¯Ǿ ³®¯²®¨«Ǿ   ¯¤±¬ ­¤­³ ­®­-¯§®³®£¤¦± £¨­¦ ³´±¥ ±¤¨­¥®±¢¨­¦ ¬ ³ (TRMȩ ³® ¢®­³±®« ¤±®²¨®­Ǿ  ­£ §¸£±®²¤¤£¨­¦ ³® ¤²³ ¡«¨²§ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ¶¨³§ £¤¤¯ ±®®³ ²¸²³¤¬²ȁ 4§¤ ±¤²´«³¨­¦ ²«®¯¤ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ¦¤­³«¤  ­£ ²³ ¡«¤  ­£ ¶®´«£ ¤­¢®¬¯ ²²   £± ¨­ ³¨«¤ ²¸²³¤¬ ³® ¢ ¯³´±¤ ¦±®´­£ ¶ ³¤±  ² ¨³ ¤­³¤±² ³§¤ £¤²¨¦­¤£ ¦± ­´« ± backfill. 7¤  ±¤ ²¤­²¨³¨µ¤ ³®Ǿ  ­£ ²´¯¯®±³¨µ¤ ®¥Ǿ ³§¤ µ «´¤² ¨­§¤±¤­³ ¨­ ³§¤ #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  ®±£¨­ ­¢¤ andǾ ¨¥ ¦± ­³¤£   ¯¤±¬¨³  ­£ µ ±¨ ­¢¤Ǿ ¶®´«£ £®  ² ¬´¢§  ² ¶¤  ±¤  ¡«¤ ³® ¬¨³¨¦ ³¤ ³§¤ µ¨²´ « ¨¬¯ ¢³ ®¥ ²´¢§   ¶ ««ȁ 4§¤ ¨¬¬¤£¨ ³¤ ¯« ­ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ³® ¤²³ ¡«¨²§ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ®­ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤  ¡®µ¤ ³§¤ ¶ «« ³§±®´¦§ ³§¤ ´²¤ ®¥  ­  ¯¯±®¯±¨ ³¤ ¬¨· ®¥ ¯« ­³²  ¯¯«¨¤£ ¡¸ hyd±®²¤¤£¨­¦ȁ 4§¤ ¤·¯¤¢³¤£ ± ¯¨£ ¦±®¶³§ ¶®´«£ ±¤²´«³ ¨­   ¦±¤¤­ ²«®¯¤ °´¨³¤ ²®®­ȁ 7¤ page 53 ¶®´«£  «²® ¯« ­³ µ¨­¤ ¯«´¦² ¨­ ¥±®­³ ®¥ ³§¤ ¶ ««  ­£Ǿ ¨­ ³¨¬¤Ǿ ³§¤ ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¯ ­¤«² ¶®´«£ ¡¤  ³ «¤ ²³ ¯ ±³¨ ««¸ ®¡²¢´±¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ µ¨­¤²ȁ )³ ¨² ®´± §®¯¤  ­£ ¨­³¤­³¨®­ ³® ¯±¤²¤±µ¤ ¤·¨²³¨­¦ ³±¤¤² ³® ³§¤ ¦±¤ ³¤²³ ¤·³¤­³ ¯®²²¨¡«¤ȁ (®¶¤µ¤±Ǿ ³§¤ ­¤¤£ ¬ ¸  ±¨²¤ ¨­ ³§¤ «®¢ ³¨®­  ­£ ¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ¯±®¯®²¤£ ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« ³® ±¤¬®µ¤ ²®¬¤ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ȁ )³ is  «²® ®´± ¨­³¤­³¨®­ ³® ¯« ­³ ²®¬¤ ³±¤¤²  ­£/or ²§±´¡² ®­ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤  ¡®µ¤ ³§¤ ¶ ««Ǿ  ² ¶¤««  ² ±¤¯« ¢¨­¦ ³§¤ «¨« ¢ ²§±´¡² ¢´±±¤­³«¸ ¦±®¶¨­¦  «®­¦ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ «¨­¤ ¶¨³§ ²®¬¤ ³¸¯¤ ®¥ ¤µ¤±¦±¤¤­ ¬¤£¨´¬-²¨¹¤£ ²§±´¡²ȝ³±¤¤²ȁ 7¤ § µ¤ ­®³ ¸¤³ ¢®­²´«³¤£   « ­£²¢ ¯¤ ¢®­³± ¢³®± ¥®±  £µ¨¢¤ ®­ ¶§ ³ ¶®´«£ ¡¤ ¬®²³ ²´¨³ ¡«¤ ¥®± ³§¤²¤ ¯« ­³¨­¦²Ǿ ¡´³ ³§¤¸ ¶®´«£ ²¢±¤¤­ ³§¤ µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ®´± §®´²¤ £¤¯¤­£¨­¦ ®­ ³§¤ µ ­³ ¦¤ ¯®¨­³ȁ 4§¤ « ­£²«¨£¤ § ² «¤¥³ ®´± §®´²¤ ²®¬¤¶§ ³ ¤·¯®²¤£Ǿ ²¨­¢¤  «« ³±¤¤²  ­£ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ®­ ³§¤  ¥¥¤¢³¤£  ±¤  ®¥ ³§¤ slo¯¤ ²«¨£ £®¶­ ®­³® ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ȁ 6 ±¨ ­¢¤ ±¤°´¤²³ 4§¤ #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  ±´«¤² would­®³  ««®¶ ¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­ ®­ ²«®¯¤²  ² ²³¤¤¯  ² ®´±² ¶¨³§®´³   varianceȁ )­  ££¨³¨®­ ³® ³§¤ ­¤¢¤²² ±¸ ¯¤±¬¨³²Ǿ ¶¤ ±¤°´¤²³   µ ±¨ ­¢¤ ¨­ ®±£¤± ³® ¬®µ¤  §¤ £ ¶¨³§ ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ #«¤ ±«¸Ǿ ³§¨² ´­£¤±³ ª¨­¦ ¨² ²®¬¤³§¨­¦ ¶¤ ¶¨²§ ¶¤±¤ ­®³ ­¤¢¤²² ±¸ȁ 7¤ § £ §®¯¤£ ³§ ³ -­$/4 ¶®´«£ § µ¤ ²§ ±¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ ±¤¯ ¨±  ­£  ²²®¢¨ ³¤£ ¢®²³²ȁ "´³ ²¨­¢¤ ¨³ § ² £¤¢«¨­¤£ ³® ¯ ±³¨¢¨¯ ³¤Ǿ ¤µ¤­ ³§®´¦§ ¨³ own² ³§¤ «®¶¤± ¯ ±³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ¶¤ ±¤ ««¸ § µ¤ ­® ¢§®¨¢¤ ¨¥ ¶¤ a±¤ ³® ¯±¤µ¤­³ ¥´±³§¤± £ ¬ ¦¤ ³® ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ±¤²³®±¤  ² ¬´¢§  ² ¯®²²¨¡«¤ ³§¤ ­ ³´± « ¤­µ¨±®­¬¤­³Ǿ  ­£ ¯±®³¤¢³ ®´± §®´²¤  ­£ ³§¤ ² ¥¤³¸ ®¥ ³§®²¤ ®­ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ ¡¤«®¶ȁ 4§¤ ¥ ¢³ ³§ ³ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ § ² ¡¤¤­ ¢´³ ¨­³® ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥  ­£ ³§´² £¤²³ ¡¨«¨¹¤£ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ³§¤ ¢®¬¯®²¨³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ±¤¬ ¨­¨­¦ ²®¨«² ¨­ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥  ­£ ²´±±®´­£¨­¦ « ­£Ǿ  ­£ ³§¤ ¯®²²¨¡¨«¨³¸ ®¥ ¥´³´±¤ §¤ µ¸ ± ¨­¥ «« ¢®´«£  «« ¢®­³±¨¡´³¤ ³® ¥´±³§¤± ²«¨£¨­¦ȁ 7¤  ±¤ µ¤±¸ ¢®­¢¤±­¤£ ³§ ³   ¶¤³ ²¯±¨­¦ ¢®´«£ ±¤²´«³ ¨­ ²´¢§   ²«¨£¤ ²¨­¢¤ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¨² ­®³ ²³ ¡«¤  ­£ ³§¤±¤ ¨² ­®¶ ­® µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ®­ ³§¤ ¥ ¨«¤£ ²«®¯¤ȁ /´± ­¤¨¦§¡®±§®®£ ¨² °´¨¤³Ǿ ¶¨³§  ­  ¡´­£ ­³ ­ ³´± « ¤­µ¨±®­¬¤­³  ­£ gracefully landscap¤£ §®¬¤²ȁ 4§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¨¤² ³§ ³ «¨¤  «®­¦ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ § µ¤ ¨­  ££¨³¨®­ ³§¤ ­ ³´± ««¸ ¶®®£¤£ ²«®¯¤ ®µ¤±«®®ª¨­¦ ³§¤ ±¨µ¤± µ ««¤¸ȁ 7¤  ±¤ §®¯¨­¦ ³® ±¤²³®±¤ ¶§ ³ ¶ ² «®²³ ¡¤§¨­£ ®´± §®´²¤  ² ¬´¢§  ² ¯®²²¨¡«¤Ǿ  ­£ ¶¤ «®®ª ¥®±¶ ±£ ³® ¤­©®¸¨­¦ ³§¤ ¸¤ ±²  §¤ £ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¯¤ ¢¤ ®¥ ¬¨­£ ³§ ³ ±¤²¯®­²¨¡«¸  ££±¤²²¨­¦ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¥ ¨«´±¤ ¶®´«£  ¥¥®±£ȁ 4§ ­ª ¸®´ ¥®± ¸®´± ¢®­²¨£¤± ³¨®­ ®¥ ®´± ±¤°´¤²³ȁ %¨«¤¤­ /Ȍ3§ ´¦§­¤²²¸  ­£ !±³ 0¤±«¬ ­ page 54 !££¤­£´¬ ³® 6 ±¨ ­¢¤ 2¤°´¤²³ 3³ ­£ ±£² ²¤³ ¥®±³§ ¨­ ³§¤ #±¨³¨¢ « !±¤  /µ¤±« ¸ ¯±®§¨¡¨³Ȁ 1.¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­ ®­ ²«®¯¤² ®¥ ¦±¤ ³¤± ³§ ­ ΓΏυ 2.¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­ ®¥ ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ ««² ®µ¤± ΔȌ ¨­ §¤¨¦§³ 3.³§¤ ´²¤ ®¥ ¯¨«¨­¦² ®± ¯±¤-¢ ²³ ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¯±®£´¢³² )­ ±¤¦ ±£² ³® ³§¤²¤ ¯±®§¨¡¨³¨®­²Ǿ ¶¤ ±¤²¯¤¢³¥´««¸ ±¤°´¤²³   µ ±¨ ­¢¤ ²® ³§ ³ ¶¤ ¬ ¸ ±¤¯ ¨± ³§¤ ²«®¯¤  ¥¥¤¢³¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ *´­¤ ΐΘǾ ΑΏΐΓ « ­£²«¨£¤ȁ 4§¤ -¤­£®³  (¤¨¦§³² 6 ±¨ ­¢¤ #§¤¢ª«¨²³ȝ1´¤²³¨®­­ ¨±¤ ¯®²¤² ³§¤ ¥®««®¶¨­¦ ³§±¤¤ °´¤²³¨®­² ±¤¦ ±£¨­¦ ³§¤ µ ±¨ ­¢¤ ±¤°´¤²³Ȁ 1.)­ ¸®´± ®¯¨­¨®­Ǿ £®¤² ³§¤ ¯±®¯®² « ¯´³ ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸ ³® ´²¤ ¨­   ±¤ ²®­ ¡«¤ manner? 2.0«¤ ²¤ £¤²¢±¨¡¤ ³§¤ ¢¨±¢´¬²³ ­¢¤² ´­¨°´¤ ³® ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸ Ȩ­®³ ¢±¤ ³¤£ ¡¸ you) 3.)­ ¸®´± ®¯¨­¨®­Ǿ ¶¨«« ³§¤ µ ±¨ ­¢¤Ǿ ¨¥ ¦± ­³¤£Ǿ ¥¨³ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ¢§ ± ¢³¤± ®¥ ³§¤ neighborhood? !² ¡ ¢ª¦±®´­£ ³® ³§¤  ­²¶¤±² ³® ³§¤²¤ °´¤²³¨®­²Ǿ ¶¤ ¶®´«£ «¨ª¤ ³® ²´¬¬ ±¨¹¤ ¶§ ³ ¶ ² ²³ ³¤£  ¡®µ¤ ¡¸ ² ¸¨­¦ ³§ ³ " ±± %­¦¨­¤¤±¨­¦Ǿ  ²   ±¤²´«³ ®¥ ³§®±®´¦§ £ ³  ¦ ³§¤±¨­¦  ­£  ­ «¸²¨²Ǿ ¢®­¢«´£¤² ³§ ³ ³§¤±¤ ¨²   ±¨²ª ®¥ ¥´±³§¤± ²«¨£¨­¦  ³ ³§¤ ² ¬¤ site  ­£  £µ¨²¤² ²«®¯¤ ²³ ¡¨«¨¹ ³¨®­ ³® ¯±¤²¤±µ¤ ®´± ¡ ¢ª ¸ ±£  ±¤ Ǿ ¯±®³¤¢³ ³§¤ ¨­³¤¦±¨³¸ ®¥ ³§¤ §®´²¤Ǿ  ­£ ³§¤ ² ¥¤³¸ ®¥ ³§®²¤ ´²¨­¦ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ ¡¤«®¶ȁ /¥ ³§¤ ¯®²²¨¡«¤  ¯¯±® ¢§¤² ³® ²³ ¡¨«¨¹ ³¨®­Ǿ   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« ¨² ¬®²³ ¯±®³¤¢³¨µ¤Ǿ ¨­ ³§ ³ ¨³ § ² ³§¤ ¤¥¥¤¢³ ®¥ ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¨­¦ ¡®³§ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ¤£¦¤  ­£ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¡¤«®¶ȁ )­  ££¨³¨®­Ǿ ³§¤ ¦¤­³«¤ ²«®¯¤ ±¤²´«³¨­¦ ¡¤§¨­£ ³§¤ ¶ «« ¢®´«£ ¡¤ ¯« ­³¤£ ¶¨³§   ¢®¬¡¨­ ³¨®­ ®¥ ³±¤¤²  ­£ȝ®± ²§±´¡²  ­£ ®³§¤± µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ȁ /¥ ³§¤ ³¶® ¬¤³§®£² ¢®­²¨£¤±¤£ ¥®± ¢®­²³±´¢³¨­¦   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ ««—¯¨«¤  ­£ ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¯ ­¤«² ®± ¬®£´« ± ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¡«®¢ª ¢®­²³±´¢³¨®­—³§¤ ¯¨«¤ȝ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¯ ­¤« ¬¤³§®£ ¶ ² ©´£¦¤£ ³® ¡¤ «¤²² £¨²±´¯³¨µ¤ ³® ³§¤ ²«®¯¤  ­£ ¡¤³³¤±  ¡«¤ ³® § ­£«¤ £± ¨­ ¦¤ ®¥ gro´­£ ¶ ³¤±Ǿ ³§´² ¯±¤µ¤­³¨­¦ ¶ ³¤± £ ¬¬¨­¦ ¡¤§¨­£ ³§¤ ¶ ««ȁ ΐȁ 9¤²Ǿ ¨³ ¨² ®´± ®¯¨­¨®­ ³§ ³ ¨³ ¨² ±¤ ²®­ ¡«¤ ³® ¯±¤²¤±µ¤ ³§¤ ¸ ±£  ±¤  ¡¤§¨­£ ³§¤ §®´²¤Ǿ ³® ¯±®³¤¢³ ³§¤ ¨­³¤¦±¨³¸ ®¥ ³§¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤ ®­ ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸Ǿ  ­£ ³® ¯±®³¤¢³ ³§¤ ² ¥¤³¸ ®¥ ³§®²¤ ´²¨­¦ ³§¤ §¨¦§¶ ¸ below ®´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸ȁ Αȁ 4§¤ ¢¨±¢´¬²³ ­¢¤² ³§ ³  ±¤ ´­¨°´¤ ³® ³§¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸  ±¤ ³§¤ ²³¤¤¯­¤²²  ­£ ¨­²³ ¡¨«¨³¸ ®¥ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ²«®¯¤ȁ !²   ±¤²´«³ ®¥ ³§¤²¤ ¢¨±¢´¬²³ ­¢¤²  ­£ §¤ µ¸ ± ¨­¥ ««Ǿ ³§¤±¤ ¶ ²   ²´¡²³ ­³¨ « « ­£²«¨£¤Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ­¤¤£² ±¤¯ ¨±ȁ "¤¢ ´²¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ²³¤¤¯­¤²² ®¥ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤Ǿ   ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «« ¶®´«£ ­¤¤£ ³® ¡¤ ¶¤«« ®µ¤± ΔȌ ³ «« ³®  £¤°´ ³¤«¸ ²³ ¡¨«¨¹¤ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ȁ - ³¤±¨ «² ®³§¤± ³§ ­ ²®¬¤ ¥®±¬ ®¥ ¢®­¢±¤³¤ ¶®´«£ ­®³ ¡¤ ²¤¢´±¤ ¤­®´¦§ ³® ¬¤¤³ ³§¤ ¤­¦¨­¤¤±¨­¦ ±¤°´¨±¤¬¤­³² ¥®± ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ «®­¦ ³¤±¬ȁ page 55 Βȁ ! £¤²¨± ¡«¤ ¥¤ ³´±¤ ®¥ ®´± ­¤¨¦§¡®±§®®£ ¨² ³§¤ ­ ³´± « ¡«´¥¥ ¤£¦¤  ­£ ²«®¯¤ ®µ¤±«®®ª¨­¦ ³§¤ ±¨µ¤± µ ««¤¸ȁ 4§¤ ­ ³´± « ¢§ ± ¢³¤±  ­£  ¯¯¤ ± ­¢¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ²«®¯¤ ®­ ®´± ¯±®¯¤±³¸ § ² ¡¤¤­ £ ¬ ¦¤£ȁ ! ²´¡²³ ­³¨ «  ¬®´­³ ®¥ ²®¨«  ­£ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ § ² ¡¤¤­ «®²³ȁ !² ²´¢§Ǿ ­®³ ®­«¸ ¨² ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ ¨­  ­ ´­² ¥¤ ¢®­£¨³¨®­Ǿ ¨³ ¯±¤²¤­³²  ­ ´­ ³³± ¢³¨µ¤ ¨­³¤±±´¯³¨®­ ¨­ ³§¤  ¯¯¤ ± ­¢¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ²«®¯¤ȁ 4§¤ µ ±¨ ­¢¤ ¶¤  ±¤ ±¤°´¤²³¨­¦ ¶®´«£  ««®¶ ³§¤ ±¤¯ ¨± ®¥ ³§¤ £ ¬ ¦¤  ­£ ¯±¤µ¤­³ ¥´±³§¤± £¤¦± £ ³¨®­ ¨­ ³§¤ ¥´³´±¤ȁ 4® § ²³¤­ ³§¤ ¤²³ ¡«¨²§¬¤­³ ®¥ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ®­ ³§¤ ±¤¯ ¨±¤£ ²«®¯¤Ǿ §¸£±®²¤¤£¨­¦ ¶¨«« ¡¤ ¤¬¯«®¸¤£  ² ¯ ±³ ®¥ ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ !­£Ǿ ¨­ ®±£¤± ³® ¬¨³¨¦ ³¤ ³§¤ µ¨²´ « ¨¬¯ ¢³ ®¥ ³§¤ ¯±®¯®²¤£ ±¤³ ¨­¨­¦ ¶ «l, ³§¤ ¯±®©¤¢³ ¯« ­ ¶®´«£  «²® ²¯¤¢¨¥¸ ³§¤ ¯« ­³¨­¦ ®¥ µ¨­¤ ¯«´¦²  ³ ³§¤ ¡ ²¤ ®¥ ³§¤ ¶ ««ȁ !«³§®´¦§ ­®³ ¢ ««¤£ ¥®± ¨­ ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³Ǿ ³® ¥´±³§¤± ±¤²³®±¤ ³§¤ ­ ³´± « ¢§ ± ¢³¤± ®¥ ³§¤ ¡«´¥¥ ²«®¯¤Ǿ ¨³ ¨² ®´± ¨­³¤­³¨®­ ³® ¯« ­³ ³±¤¤²  ­£ȝ®± ²§±´¡²  «®­¦ ³§¤ ¤£¦¤  ­£ £®¶­ ²«®¯¤ ¨­ ³§¤ ¥´³´±¤ȁ page 56 page 57 page 58 page 59 page 60 page 61 62 page page 63 page 64 Memorandum John Mazzitello and Nolan Wall To: Steve Klein and Joel Swenson From: Summary of Geotechnical Investigation and Analyses at 731 Woodridge Drive, Mendota Subject: Heights, MN March 2, 2015 Date: Eileen OÔShaughnessy c: This memorandum provides a summary of the geotechnical investigation and analyses Barr Engineering Company has subcontracted, observer, and performed for the landslide that occurred at 731 Woodridge Drive. The purpose of this work was to i) assess the landslide, ii) develop preliminary cost estimates for several slope stabilization techniques, and iii) complete a final design on an option chosen by the residents at 731 Woodridge Drive. This memorandum summarizes the project background, geotechnical investigation and geotechnical analyses and preliminary design process completed for Eileen OÔShaughnessy. Background The landslide occurred on June 19, 2014. We were informed that MnDOT had initially planned to construct a retaining wall at the base of the slope within the Highway 13 Right-of-Way (ROW) and had completed test pits near the proposed wall alignment. We were informed that MnDOT had aborted its plan to construct that wall. To our knowledge, MnDOT had not performed a geotechnical investigation with soil borings or laboratory testing, or completed a geotechnical analysis of the slope leading down to Highway 13 since no geotechnical information was available for the slope. In September 2014, Barr was retained by Eileen OÔShaughnessy and Art Pearlman to a) identify the current condition of their slope, and if found to be unstable, b) determine preliminary cost estimates for stabilization and restoration. Geostabilization International (GSI) from Fort Collins, Colorado had provided Eileen OÔShaughnessy with a geotechnical design and cost estimate for a soil nailing slope stabilization. Geotechnical Investigation The geotechnical investigation consisted of seismic testing, site reconnaissance, geotechnical drilling with Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) and rock coring, and laboratory testing. Geophysical Survey A geophysical survey was completed by 3Dgeophysics from Chaska, Minnesota on Tuesday, September 30, 2015. The purpose of performing a geophysical survey of the slope was to see if bedrock could be page 65 John Mazzitello and Nolan Wall To: Steve Klein and Joel Swenson From: Summary of Geotechnical Investigation and Analyses at 731 Woodridge Drive, Mendota Heights, MN Subject: March 2, 2015 Date: 2 Page: 23/19-1249.00 Project: Eileen O’Shaughnessy c: detected and to collect general soil and rock stiffness information. The locations of the geophysical arrays are shown in the attached drawings. Small electronic vibration sensors were placed in ÑarraysÒ (i.e. a line) approximately 50 to 60 feet long. Two arrays were set, one along the crest parallel to the slope and another running from the house, over the failed slope, down to Highway 13 Right-of-Way (ROW). To perform the seismic tests, a geophysical survey crew member impacts a steel plate on the ground with a mall, at several locations, creating energy waves travelling into the ground that are reflected back and upwards to the small electronic vibration sensors (geophones) spread out in the array. The information collected consists of energy wave speeds of varying velocities, and this information was used analyzed for soil and rock stiffness. The array lengths used provided soil and rock information to a depth of approximately 50 feet below the ground surface. The results of the geophysical survey had shown energy wave speeds typical of soil to a depth of about 40 feet below the crest of the slope and soft rock below that. The overall data signal quality was determined to be ÑexcellentÒ by the geophysical survey crew. Site Reconnaissance Joel Swenson, a Barr Geotechnical Engineer, performed site reconnaissance October 23 and 24, 2014. Observations of the general soil type, failure type and shape were recorded. The failed slope surface soil was generally a clayey-sand, to sandy-lean clay. The slope failure appeared to have started at the toe of a 6 foot retaining wall located at the crest of the slope with a slight bowl-shape extending about half way up the slope. Remnants of a thin layer of limestone (less than 1/2 inch thick) was identified near the ROW line with a small outcrop of greenish gray Decorah Shale just below that. According to the area geologic maps, the Decorah shale contains thin limestone beds (Dakota County Atlas C-6 Plate 2, Bedrock Geology). Geotechnical Drilling To confirm the geophysical survey results, two soil borings were completed October 23 and 24 by Glacial Ridge Drilling from New London, Minnesota. Joel Swenson of Barr Engineering directed and observed the geotechnical drilling. Soil and rock samples collected from the drilling campaign were delivered to Soil Engineering Testing of Richfield, Minnesota for laboratory testing. The boring logs are attached, and the approximate locations are shown in the attached drawings. The general lithology in the vicinity of the soil borings is as follows: Topsoil: Ground surface to -0.5 ft o Clayey sand with cobbles and boulders (typical glacial till) -0.5 ft to about -30 feet: o Decorah Shale Residual soil at the top of the unit transitioning to a soft rock about 13 ft into the unit o P:\\Mpls\\23 MN\\19\\23191249 O'Shaughnessy Prop Landslide\\WorkFiles\\Executive Summary Soil Exploration and Geotechnical Analysis\\Memorandum.docx page 66 John Mazzitello and Nolan Wall To: Steve Klein and Joel Swenson From: Summary of Geotechnical Investigation and Analyses at 731 Woodridge Drive, Mendota Heights, MN Subject: March 2, 2015 Date: 3 Page: 23/19-1249.00 Project: Eileen O’Shaughnessy c: The results of the geophysical survey confirm observations made from the geotechnical drilling with a denser and stiff unit at a depth of about 40 feet. Laboratory Analyses Index and strength testing were performed on soil and rock samples collected during the geotechnical investigation. Soil Engineering Testing located in Richfield, MN completed the laboratory testing. The test results confirmed that the Decorah Shale: Increases in strength with depth Has a relatively high capacity to hold water; which actually is a detriment to its strength capacity. And it is weathered so its strength characteristics are more consistent with soil than bedrock at least to the bottom of the two borings. Geotechnical Analysis Geotechnical computer modeling Software (FLAC) by Itasca located in Minneapolis, MN was used to analyze the slope failure and the final design. Information from the MnDOT scan data, geophysical survey, geotechnical borings and laboratory testing were used to develop the geotechnical model. Since the topography before the landslide occurred is unknown, we analyzed the post slide topography for its stability. Results of the modeling revealed that if precipitation events similar to that of June 2014 happen again, it is likely that the slope will be unstable. The probable scarp of the slope failure will likely be near the back deck footings of the residence (about15 feet south of the existing crest of the slope). Preliminary Cost Estimates Given that the slope was found to be in danger of further failure, we completed preliminary cost estimates for the following three options so that each could be compared to the soil nailing option that GSI had provided our clients in September: 1.H-piling and concrete panel retaining wall placed along the 731 Woodridge Dr/Hwy 13 property line 2.A concrete block gravity retaining wall consisting of large modular blocks placed along the 731 Woodridge Dr/Hwy 13 property line 3.Reticulated micropiles placed along the crest of the slope Relative costs and pros and cons for each of the 4 options (the three Barr-analyzed options and the one GSI-analyzed) were developed for our clients to consider and make a more informed decision as to which option they wanted to move forward with. P:\\Mpls\\23 MN\\19\\23191249 O'Shaughnessy Prop Landslide\\WorkFiles\\Executive Summary Soil Exploration and Geotechnical Analysis\\Memorandum.docx page 67 John Mazzitello and Nolan Wall To: Steve Klein and Joel Swenson From: Summary of Geotechnical Investigation and Analyses at 731 Woodridge Drive, Mendota Heights, MN Subject: March 2, 2015 Date: 4 Page: 23/19-1249.00 Project: Eileen O’Shaughnessy c: Final Design In the end they chose Option 1 listed above as it provided protection of their home as well as Hwy 13. We are currently developing a drawing and specifications set for Option 1. .ƚƩźƓŭ\[ƚŭƭͲĻƭƷwĻƭǒƌƷƭğƓķ5ƩğǞźƓŭƭ Following are the boring logs, test results and drawings for 731 Woodridge Drive: P:\\Mpls\\23 MN\\19\\23191249 O'Shaughnessy Prop Landslide\\WorkFiles\\Executive Summary Soil Exploration and Geotechnical Analysis\\Memorandum.docx page 68 page 69 page 70 Water Content Test Summary (ASTM:D2216) Project:Job: O'Shaughnessy Slide 9646 ClientDate Barr Engineering Company:11/3/2014 Sample Information & Classification Boring # B-1B- 1B-1B-1B-1B-1B-2B-2 Sample # 123456 Depth (ft) 5-6.515-16.5 Type BagBagBagBagBagBagBagBag Sandy Lean Sandy Lean Sandy Lean Sandy Lean Sandy Lean Sandy Lean Sandy LeanSandy Lean Material ClayClay Clay w/ gravelClayClay Clay Clay Clay w/ gravel Classification (CL)(CL)(CL)(CL)(CL)(CL)(CL)(CL) Water Content (%) 11.38.411.713.011.018.48.810.0 Sample Information & Classification Boring # Sample # Depth (ft) Type Material Classification Water Content (%) Sample Information & Classification Boring # Sample # Depth (ft) Type Material Classification Water Content (%) Sample Information & Classification Boring # Sample # Depth (ft) Type Material Classification Water Content (%) Grain Size Distribution ASTM D422 9646 Job No. : page 71 Project: Test Date: 10/29/14 Reported To:Report Date: 11/5/14 Location / Boring No. Sample No.Depth (ft) GravelSandHydrometer Analysis Coar seFineCoarseMediumFineFines 2 13/4 3/8 #4#10#20 #40#100 #200 100 90 80 70 60 Percent Passing 50 40 30 20 10 0 .005.002 502052 .5 .2 .05 .02 1001010.10.010.001 Grain Size (mm) Other TestsPercent Passing Mass (g)D Liquid Limit 60 2"D Plastic Limit 30 1.5"D Plasticity Index 10 1"C Water Content U C 3/4" Dry Density (pcf) C Remarks: 3/8" Specific Gravity #4 Porosity #10 Organic Content #20 pH #40 Shrinkage Limit #100 Penetrometer #200 Qu (psf) (* = assumed) 2401 W 66th StreetRichfield, Minnesota 55423-2031 Grain Size Distribution ASTM D422 Job No. : 9646 page 72 Project: Test Date: 10/29/14 Reported To:Report Date: 11/5/14 Location / Boring No.Sample No.Depth (ft) Spec 1 Spec 2 Spec 3 Sieve Data Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Sieve% PassingSieve% PassingSieve% Passing 2"2"2" 1.5"1.5"1.5" 1"1"1" 3/4"100.03/4"3/4"100.0 3/8"98.23/8"3/8"96.4 #493.7#4#494.4 #1089.1#10100.0#1088.8 #2082.7#20100.0#2078.9 #4070.8#40100.0#4073.7 #10045.2#10096.0#10069.7 #20035.3#20093.6#20068.3 Hydrometer Data Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Diameter (mm)% PassingDiameter% PassingDiameter% Passing 0.03228.20.03056.40.03231.4 0.02123.90.01951.40.02128.5 0.01220.00.01245.10.01226.0 0.00917.40.00840.10.00922.5 0.00614.60.00636.30.00619.6 0.00312.00.00330.60.00317.8 0.00110.40.00124.60.00112.6 Remarks Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Richfield, MN 55423 Grain Size Distribution ASTM D422 9646 Job No. : page 73 Project: Test Date: 10/31/14 Reported To:Report Date: 11/5/14 Location / Boring No.Sample No.Depth (ft) GravelSandHydrometer Analysis CoarseFineCoarseMediumFineFines 2 13/4 3/8 #4#10#20 #40#100 #200 100 90 80 70 60 Percent Passing 50 40 30 20 10 0 20.005.002 5052.5 .2 .05 .02 1001010.10.010.001 Grain Size (mm) Other TestsPercent Passing Mass (g)D Liquid Limit 60 2"D Plastic Limit 30 1.5"D Plasticity Index 10 1"C Water Content U 3/4"C Dry Density (pcf) C 3/8"Remarks: Specific Gravity #4 Porosity #10 Organic Content #20 pH #40 Shrinkage Limit #100 Penetrometer #200 Qu (psf) (* = assumed) 2401 W 66th StreetRichfield, Minnesota 55423-2031 Grain Size Distribution ASTM D422 9646 Job No. : page 74 Project: Test Date: 10/31/14 Reported To:Report Date: 11/5/14 Location / Boring No.Sample No.Depth (ft) Spec 1 Spec 2 Spec 3 Sieve Data Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Sieve% PassingSieve% PassingSieve% Passing 2"2"2" 1.5"1.5"1.5" 1"1"1" 3/4"3/4"3/4" 3/8"3/8"3/8" #4#4#4 #10100.0#10100.0#10 #20100.0#20100.0#20 #4099.9#40100.0#40 #10086.9#10094.1#100 #20080.1#20091.5#200 Hydrometer Data Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Diameter (mm)% PassingDiameter% PassingDiameter% Passing 0.03057.10.02968.6 0.02050.20.01962.5 0.01242.90.01156.4 0.00837.40.00850.4 0.00633.20.00645.0 0.00330.00.00337.1 0.00127.90.00129.1 Remarks Specimen 1Specimen 2Specimen 3 Richfield, MN 55423 page 75 Project:O'Shaughnessy SlideJob:9646 Client:Barr Engineering CompanyDate:11/11/14 Remarks: 1.2 Boring:B-1Depth:35-35.7 Sample #: Soil Type: Shale - Silt (ML) 1 Strain Rate (in/min):0.045 Sample Type:Core Deviator Stress (tsf) Dia. (in)1.87Ht.(in)4.05 0.8 Height to Diameter Ratio:2.2 Unconfined Comp. Strength:1.13tsf Strain at Failure (%):7.9 0.6 W.C. (%):19.5 Sketch of Specimen After Failure Yd (pcf):105.9 0. 4 LL:48.8 PL:30.8 PI:18.0 0.2 0 02468101214161820 Axial Strain (%) Boring:B-1Depth:42-42.5 4 Sample #: Soil Type: Shale - Fat Clay (CH) 3.5 Strain Rate (in/min):0.045 Sample Type:Core 3 Deviator Stress (tsf) Dia. (in):1.83Ht. (in):4.02 Height to Diameter Ratio:2.2 2.5 Unconfined Comp. Strength:3.46tsf Strain at Failure (%):4.0 2 W.C. (%):21.9Sketch of Specimen After Failure 1.5 Yd (pcf):101.4 LL:86.2 1 PL:27.5 PI:58.7 0.5 0 02468101214161820 Axial Strain (%) page 76 Project:O'Shaughnessy SlideJob:9646 Client:Barr Engineering CompanyDate:11/11/14 Remarks: 1.2 Boring:B-2Depth:30.2-32 Sample #: Soil Type: Shale - Fat Clay (CH) 1 Strain Rate (in/min):0.045 Sample Type:Core Deviator Stress (tsf) Dia. (in)1.84Ht.(in)4.01 0.8 Height to Diameter Ratio:2.2 Unconfined Comp. Strength:0.96tsf Strain at Failure (%):4.0 0.6 W.C. (%):16.9 Sketch of Specimen After Failure Yd (pcf):113.4 0. 4 LL:61.2 PL:18.9 PI:42.3 0.2 0 02468101214161820 Axial Strain (%) Boring:B-2Depth:42-44 2 Sample #: Soil Type: 1.8 Shale - Fat Clay (CH) 1.6 Strain Rate (in/min):0.045 Sample Type:Core 1.4 Deviator Stress (tsf) Dia. (in):1.84Ht. (in):4.02 Height to Diameter Ratio:2.2 1.2 Unconfined Comp. Strength:1.89tsf Strain at Failure (%):3.0 1 W.C. (%):20.8Sketch of Specimen After 0.8 Failure Yd (pcf):104.6 0.6 LL:79.8 PL:19.9 PI:59.9 0.4 0.2 0 02468101214161820 Axial Strain (%) page 77 page 79 page 80 page 81 Print PreviewPage 1of 1 page 82 http://gis.co.dakota.mn.us/DCGIS/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://gis.co.dakota.mn.us/C...33201 o//5 Print PreviewPage 1of 1 page 83 http://gis.co.dakota.mn.us/DCGIS/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://gis.co.dakota.mn.us/C...33201 o//5 page 84 9a. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP, MBA Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Safety Committee Report and Recommendations BACKGROUND rd The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) met on March 3, 2015 at 5:30pm. In attendance at the meeting were Public Works Director/City Engineer John Mazzitello, Police Chief Mike Aschenbrener, Council Member Mike Povolny, and Planning Commission Chair Litton Field Jr. Fire Chief John Maczko was excused. Also in attendance were residents of the Warrior Drive neighborhood. The TSC discussed four issues; two of which were updates not requiring any recommendation or Council action. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.UPDATE –Speed on Marie Avenue – Requested by West Saint Paul resident through the West Saint Paul Police Department. Last year, the City of West Saint Paul reconstructed Marie Avenue between Delaware Avenue and Charlton Avenue. In February of this year, the West Saint Paul Police Department received a complaint about speed on the newly constructed portion of Marie Avenue. Since Marie Avenue connects to Mendota Heights, the resident also contacted the MHPD about the issue. WSP and MHPD will be performing targeted enforcement along Marie Avenue beginning this spring. Note – MendotaHeights reconstructed Marie Avenue between Delaware Avenue and Dodd Road in 2012, narrowing the travel lanes to 11 feet wide. Speed complaints are down, as is actual monitored speed. Recommendation:No Council action is needed on this item. 2.UPDATE – Crosswalks on Wachtler Avenue – Requested by area resident. According to the requestor, residents who live on the east side of Wachtler Avenue (County Road 8) have difficulty crossing Wachtler to access the trail located on the west side of the road. The resident is requesting a crosswalk be striped and signed at the intersection of Wachtler and Lower Colonial, and possibly an additional crosswalk at Cherry Hill Road. Since Wachtler Avenue is a County Road, this request was forwarded to Dakota County Transportation Department staff, and we are awaiting their response. Recommendation: No Council action is needed on this item. page 85 3.Request to Change Yield Signs to Stop Signs –Lilac Lane – Requested by residents on Lilac Lane Staff received a request in early January to replace the Yield Signs with Stop Signs at the intersection of Lilac Drive and Douglas Road, as well as Lilac Drive and Caren Road. th Requesting residents also presented their request at the January 20 Council meeting under Public Comments. Stop Signs are designed to establish a clear right-of-way at intersections. Mendota Heights has all Stop Sign locations codified in Title 6 of our City Code. If Stop Signs were to be installed in place of the existing Yield Signs, an Ordinance would need to be brought before City Council for adoption. Recommendation: TSC reviewed the intersection and MHPD did some in person observations of the intersection. TSC is recommending leaving the Yield Signs in place and continue observation of the intersections. If Council would like to replace the Yield Signs with Stop Signs, pass a motion by simple majority vote, to direct staff to bring forward an Ordinance codifying the intersections as Stop Sign locations. 4.Warrior Drive Parking –Ongoing – Directed by City Council at request of residents This ongoing issue was generated originally in September of 2013 by the City Council who referred resident concerns over traffic safety on Warrior Drive to the Traffic Safety Committee. At issue are resident concerns about mid-block U-turns, excessive speed, noise, and litter generated by on street parking on the east side of Warrior Drive (northbound) associated with traffic from Henry Sibley High School (HSHS). City Council directed the Traffic Safety Committee to study the issues and report back to the Council with recommendations by the end of 2014. Since that time, HSHS has added additional permit parking in their main lot, and provided free parking in the southeast lot at Delaware Avenue and Mendota Road. In addition, the school held an all-school assembly in September where School Resource Officer Jennifer Fordam addressed the residents’ traffic safety concerns. In an unrelated event, Dakota County constructed the realignment of the River to River Greenway (RTRG), formerly called the North Urban Regional Trail (NURT).This construction started in September 2014 and has all but concluded in this area of the project. Because of this construction, parking was temporarily prohibited on the east side of Warrior Drive to accommodate trail construction. Parking privilege was restored the first week of November, and staff has been observing the area since that time. TSC reviewed statistics from MHPD (see attached), and answered questions from the residents in attendance. Total Warrior Drive parking utilization is down from previous years, “no U-turn” signs have been posted, and MHPD monitors morning and afternoon traffic as resources allow. Recommendation: TSC recommends no change to the existing parking on the east side of Warrior Drive. TSC further recommends continued monitoring of the area through the end of the 2015-2016 school year, and recurring school assemblies to talk about traffic safety and parking issues. TSC also recommends that traffic safety concerns be reviewed and potential solutions incorporated into the Warrior Drive street rehabilitation project currently scheduled for the summer of 2016. page 86 If Council wishes to implement a parking prohibition on Warrior Drive, pass a motion by simple majority vote to direct staff to bring forward an Ordinance codifying the desired no parking area(s). BUDGET IMPACT No expenses are associated with any of the TSC recommendations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council receive the TSC report and recommendations. page 87 page 88 9b. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tamara Schutta, Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator SUBJECT: 2015Contract for Pilot Knob Management BACKGROUND Attached you will find the 2015 contract proposal from Great River Greening to manage restoration work at Pilot Knob site. Great River Greening continues to work from the multi-year management plan for the site which was adopted by the city council in 2007. The 2015 contract includes the following: Control (spraying, cutting, mowing, soil treatment) of invasive species including burdock, oth brome, and Canada goldenrod Group volunteer events Trail/overlook mowing and maintenance Conservation grazing services Restoration of Phase I portion of MnDOT Hwy 55 roadside Mr. Wiley Buck will be providing asummaryof the 2014 activities along with an overview of what is planned for 2015. Attachment(s) 2015 Great River Greening Contract Exhibit A: Metro Conservation Corridors Phase VII Addendum BUDGET IMPACT The proposed contract for $5,200 is consistent with the 2015 budget for this activity. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends accepting the proposed 2015 Pilot Knob Management contract and Exhibit A. If city council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion authorizing staff to execute a contract with Great River Greening for Pilot Knob Hill Restoration. This action requires a simple majority vote. page 89 CONTRACT Great River Greening 35 West Water Street, Suite 201 Saint Paul, MN 55107-2016 651-665-9500 651-665-9409 FAX Contracting AgentPhoneDate City of Mendota Heights651 452-185011 March 2015 Street AddressProject Name 1101 Victoria CurvePilot Knob Hill Restoration City, State, Zip CodeProject Location Mendota Heights, MN 55118Pilot Knob Hill Natural Area Client NameContactContact Phone Tammy Schutta452-1850 Greening ContactDate of BidProject Number(s)GreeningContact Phone 651-665-9500x15 Wiley Buck11 March 2015LPIL17, LPIL18 GPIL19LPIL20 I. Parties. This contract governs the rights and responsibilities of Great River Greening (hereafter referred to as Greening) and the Contracting party, (hereafter referred to as Mendota Heights, where Greening has been retained to perform services for the contracting party). II. Scope of Services . Greening agrees to provide the following list of restoration services for Mendota Heights: Control (spraying, cutting, mowing, soil treatment) of invasive species including oth brome, and Canada goldenrod group volunteer events Trail/overlook mowing and maintenance Conservation grazing services Restoration of Phase I portion of MnDOT Hwy 55 roadside III. Schedule of Payments. Mendota Heights will make payment totaling $5,200 uponthe following schedule: $5,200 for general management Great River Greening agrees to pursue up to $20,000 from Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund, per Exhibit A, and up to $10,000 in matching funds from MnDOT Partnership Plan, for roadside restoration. IV. Limitation of liability. Mendota Heights shall indemnify Greening and hold it harmless from and against any loss, claims, liabilities, damages and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, related to the Project or the performance of their services pursuant to this Agreement, unless caused by the negligence of Greening, its agents or employees, or covered by the insurance required in Section VIII of this contract. Nothing in this contract is intended, nor should it be construed, as a waiver of any municipal tort liability limits, governmental immunities or defenses which otherwise protect the City of Mendota Heights. Greening shall indemnify Mendota Heights and hold it harmless from and against any loss, claims, liabilities, damages and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of Greening's breach of the Agreement and/or the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct, unless caused by the negligence of Mendota Heights, its agents or employees. V. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only in a written document signed by both parties. VI. Independent Contractors. Each party, its officers, agents and employees are at all times an independent contractor to the other party. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to make or render either party or any of its officers, agents, or employees an agent, servant, or employee of, or joint venture of or with, the other. VII. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement and understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and it supercedes all prior and concurrent agreements, understandings, promises or representations, whether written or oral, made by either party to the other concerning such subject matter. VIII. Insurance. Greening agrees to maintain during the term of this Consulting Contract the following insurance: Workers Compensation Insurance, Commercial General Liability (with coverage no more restrictive that that provided for by standard ISO Form CG 00 01 11 88 or CG 00 01 10 93 with standard exclusions "a" through "n") with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 in the aggregate for bodily injury and property damages, the limit specified may be satisfied with a combination of primary and Umbrella/Excess Insurance. IX. Waiver. The failure of either party to insist in any one or more instances upon strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the right to enforce or require compliance with such provision. X. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. XI. Completion. Work for this Project will be performed by 31 December 2015 unless circumstances beyond Greening's control prevent Greening from completing the Project. Pilot Knob 2015 2 page 91 Contact Persons The authorized contact person for The authorized contact person for Mendota Greening is:Heightsis: Wiley BuckTamara Schutta, PHR Restoration EcologistAssistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator 35 Water Street, Suite 2011101 Victoria Curve Saint Paul, MN 55107Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651-665-9500 ext. 15651-452-1850 651-775-8759 celltamaras@mendota-heights.com wbuck@greatrivergreening.org Great River GreeningMendota HeightsRepresentative Signature: Signature: ____________________________________________________________ Name:Name: Wayne Ostlie _______________________________ Title: Title: Director of Conservation Programs_______________________________ Date:Date: ___________________________________________________________ Grant Manager:________ Director of Finance:_______ page 92 EXHIBIT A: METRO CONSERVATION CORRIDORS PHASE VII ADDENDUM AGREEMENT BETWEEN GREAT RIVER GREENING (THE TRUST FUND APPROPRIATION RECIPIENT) AND PARTNER THIS AGREEMENT is made between Great River Greening (hereinafter "R of Mendota Heights (hereinafter the "Partner"). WHEREAS, The Minnesota Legislature by Minnesota Laws M.L. 2013, Regular Session, Chapter 52, Section 2, Subd.4(d)2.3 appropriated $208,000 to the Commissioner of MN-DNR for Restoring our Lands and Watersfor an agreement with Great River Greening; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed between the Recipient, and the Partner as follows: 1.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.1 COMPLIANCE The Partner acknowledges that these funds are proceeds from the State of Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (hereinafter the "Trust Fund"), which is subject to certain legal restrictions and requirements, including Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116P. The Partner is responsible for compliance with this and all other relevant state and federal laws and regulations in the fulfillment of the Project. 1.2 ACCESS ccess will be at reasonable times and with sufficient prior notification, and will extend ten (10) years beyond the project completion date. page 93 2.0 PROJECT Figure 1: Project Site Plan 2.1 CONTRIBUTIONS Project Work. This Agreement may be modified at any time by mutual written consent of the parties. It may be terminated by either party upon 30 days advance written notice to the other party. However, if the Partner(s) terminates the Agreement before its expiration, then the Partner(s) agrees to reimburse the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund prior to final termination for the pro-rated costs of all habitat restoration projects placed on the described land through this Agreement. For these purposes the total revised updated cost of the habitat restoration projects to the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund are agreed to be a maximum of $22,850 total, to be spent between date of agreement and June 30, 2016. 2.2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS statement, press release, bid solicitation, project publications, and other public communications and outreach related to the work completed using the Trust Fund appropriation. The acknowledgement will contain the following language and/or logo(s): (Partial) funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). page 94 Preferred acknowledgement language is: (Partial) Funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen membership in the Metro Conservation Corridors partnership. Partner agrees to maintain signs installed by Greening at the Project Site that includes this acknowledgement language, and will include it in permanent signage. 2.3 ECOLOGICAL AND RESTORATION MANAGEMENT PLAN For all restorations conducted with money appropriated under this section, the Recipient must prepare an ecological restoration and management plan that, to the degree practicable, is consistent with the highest quality conservation and ecological goals for the restoration site. Consideration should be given to soil, geology, topography, and other relevant factors that would provide the best chance for long-term success of the restoration projects. The plan must include the proposed timetable for implementing the restoration, including site preparation, establishment of diverse plant species native to Minnesota, maintenance, and additional enhancement to establish the restoration; identify long-term maintenance and management needs of the restoration and how the maintenance, management, and enhancement will be financed; and take advantage of the best available science and include innovative techniques to achieve the best restoration. Seeding/planting will follow the local ecotype sequencing steps outlined in the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources Native Vegetation Establishment and Enhancement Guidelines (http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/native_vegetation/seeding_guidelines.pdfOctober 2014 version). 2.4 RESTORATION EVALUATION Recipient must provide an initial restoration evaluation to LCCMR at the completion of the appropriation and an evaluation three years beyond the completion of the expenditure. Restorations must be evaluated relative to the stated goals and standards in the restoration plan, current science, and, when applicable, the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources Native Vegetation Establishment and Enhancement Guidelines. The evaluation shall determine whether the restorations are meeting planned goals, identify any problems with the implementation of the restorations, and, if necessary, give recommendations on improving restorations. The evaluation shall be focused on improving future restorations. 2.5 LONG TERM RESTORATION The Partner acknowledges the long term maintenance and enhancement needs of the restoration process to achieve restoration goals. The Partner agrees to maintain restoration page 95 for a minimum of 10 years. The Recipient agrees to make reasonable good faith effort to significantly contribute to the successful maintenance of the project. Minnesota Department of Transportation is the Landowner. If the Landowner(s) or Partner should fail to maintain the habitat restoration for 10 years, then the Partner(s) agrees to reimburse the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund for the pro-rated costs of all habitat restoration projects placed on the described land through this Agreement. 2.6 PROTECTED LAND Partner testifies that the restoration project is on land permanently protected by a conservation easement or public ownership or in public waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.005, subdivision 15; and will provide reasonable written documentation of such protection. 2.7 CONTRACTING Partner understands that Recipient must give consideration to Conservation Corps Minnesota or its successor for sub-contract restoration and enhancement services. 2.8 POLLINATOR HABITAT ENHANCEMENT DNR practices and guidelines for pollinator habitat enhancement must be used for all soon as they become available. Prairie restorations conducted on state lands or with state funds must include an appropriate diversity of native species selected to provide habitat for pollinators throughout the growing season. Recommendations for appropriate species must be incorporated into projects as soon as they become available. page 96 9c. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tamara Schutta, Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator SUBJECT: Appointments to Noise Oversight Committee BACKGROUND The City of Mendota Heights is a voting member of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Noise Oversight Committee (NOC). This committee monitors aircraft operations at the airport and makes recommendations to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) about various noise-related issues. - designated representative is Councilmember Liz Petschel, with alternates being Councilmember Ultan Duggan and Airport Relations Commission chair David Sloan. These terms expire this June, and the MAC has requested that the city council make appointments for the next two year term. The terms of these appointments will be June 26, 2015 through June 25, 2017. Councilmember Liz Petschel and Airport Relations Commission chair David Sloan have expressed their interest in being reappointed to serve the two-year term beginning June 26, 2015. Councilmember Ultan Duggan does not wish to be reappointed as an alternate to NOC. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION If the council concurs, it should, by motion appoint Councilmember Liz Petschel as primary representative, and Airport Relations Commission chair David Sloan as alternate representative, to the Noise Oversight Committee for a term of June 26, 2015 through June 25, 2017. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 97 9d. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tamara Schutta, Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator SUBJECT: Set May Goal Setting Workshop BACKGROUND The City Council met in a workshop on February 3, 2015 to review their goals for 2015. Several topics were identified. Direction was provided to staff to continue working on these goals in 2015 and to provide an update at a May workshop. In the past, the City Council has held their goal setting sessions on a weekday afternoon, typically from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Staff is recommending the City Council select a date and time for their May Goal Setting Workshop. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council set a date and time for the May 2015 Goal Setting Workshop. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 98 3/12/2015 2:30 PM SuMoTuWeThFrSa 3456132027 11121926 SATURDAY 1718232425 June 2015 910 162330 296 30 12 1516 82229 142128 7 FRIDAY May 1 SuMoTuWeThFrSa 26789162330 114152229 152229 85 2021262728 May 2015 1213 45 1819 1125 THURSDAY 310172431 30142128 74 WEDNESDAY 1 29132027 63 7:00pm City Council 7:00pm City Council TUESDAY 28121926 52 MONDAY Jun 1 27111825 4 May 2015 amara Schutta SUNDAY Apr 26 10172431 3 T page 99 9e. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance 473 Adopting Proposed Code Amendments for After-the-Fact Permit Fees BACKGROUND In 2014, the City approved two after-the-fact zoning permit applications. Currently, the City only has the authority to charge additional fees for after-the-fact building and sign permits. In order to charge additional fees for after-the-fact zoning permits, the City Code must be amended to grant the authority. If approved, language would also be added to the Fee Schedule. Actions requiring an after-the-fact permit are also subject to the General Penalty provision, as in Title 1-4-1(A), which provides apenalty for violations of the City Code. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at the February 24meeting; there were no public comments. The recommendation for adoption did include an amendment to the DRAFT ordinance to allow for a minimum additional fee of $250. Based on the proposed language and existing fees, after-the-fact permit feesfor applicable zoning permits would be as follows: After-the-Fact PermitPermit FeeTotal Permit Fee PermitFee Accessory Structure $25$250 $275 Permit Conditional UsePermit$350$350$700 Critical Area Permit$100$250$350 Fence Permit$25$250$275 $200 Residential$250$450 Variance $250 Commercial/Industrial$250$500 $150 Residential$250$400 Wetlands Permit $200 Commercial/Industrial$250$450 BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of DRAFT Ordinance 473, as described in Planning Case 2015-04. If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adoptingORDINANCE 473 CONCERNING AFTER-THE-FACT PERMIT APPLICATION FEES. Thismatterrequires a simple majority vote. page 100 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 473 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12-1L-10 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, DAKOTA COUNTY, CONCERNING AFTER-THE-FACT PERMIT APPLICATION FEES The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Section 1. Section 12-1L-10 is hereby amended to read as follows: 12-1L-10: FEES AND DEPOSITS: A. Base Fees: The base fees to be paid for each application shall be established by ordinance. Base fees shall be payable at the time applications are filed with the city clerk and shall not be refundable unless said application is withdrawn prior to referral to the planning commission.In addition to any other remediesavailable to the city, a doublefee or $250, whichever is greater,shall be charged if action requiring any permit required by this Title is undertaken without first obtaining a permit for such action. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this seventeenthday of March, 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ___________________________ Lorri Smith, CityClerk page 101 DATE: February 24, 2015 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2015-04 Proposed Code Amendments – After-the-fact Permit Fees APPLICANT: City of Mendota Heights PROPERTY ADDRESS: N/A ZONING/GUIDED: N/A ACTION DEADLINE: N/A DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The City is considering amendments to Title 12, Chapter 1, Article L of the City Code concerning fees and deposits. BACKGROUND Staff has identified apotential code amendment concerning after-the-fact permit fees for discussion and recommendation by the Planning Commission. In 2014, the City approved twoafter-the-fact permits involving non-compliant vegetation removal activities. Currently, the City only has the authority to charge additional fees for after-the-fact building and sign permits, as in Title 9-1-1(A) and Title 12-1D-15(B)(2) of the City Code. In order to charge additional fees for after-the-fact zoning permits (critical area permit, conditional use permit, variance, wetlands permit, etc.), the City Code must be amended to grant the authority. If approved, language would also be added to the Fee Schedule. Actions requiring an after-the-fact permit are also subject to the General Penalty provision, as in Title 1-4-1(A), which provides a penalty for violations of the City Code. ANALYSIS As contained in DRAFT Ordinance 473, the following amendment is proposed: 12-1L-10: FEES AND DEPOSITS: A. Base Fees: The base fees to be paid for each application shall be established by ordinance. Base fees shall be payable at the time applications are filed with the city clerk and shall not be refundable unless said application is withdrawn prior to referral to the planning commission. In addition to any other remedies available to the city, a doublefee shall be charged if action requiring any permit required by this Title is undertaken without first obtaining a permit for such action. page 102 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the proposed code amendment. If acceptable to the Commission, action can be taken at this month’s meeting. Staff would proposeto bring back any suggested revisions for review at a future meeting prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. ACTION REQUESTED Following the public hearing and further discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1.Recommend approval of DRAFT Ordinance 473, as presented or as amended by the Commission. OR 2.Recommend denial of DRAFT Ordinance 473. OR 3.Table the request, pending additional information and revisions from staff. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1.DRAFT Ordinance 473 2.Planning Application page 103 page 104 page 105 page 106 9f. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council, City Administrator FROM: Lorri Smith, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution 2015-19 Approving Revised Fee Schedule BACKGROUND With the passage of proposed Ordinance 473 regarding After-the-Fact Permit fees, the Fee Schedule needs to be amended to include newfees. Along with that change, we are proposing a few other amendments for clarification purposes. Included with this memo are the pages of the FeeSchedule that include the changes being proposed. Staff is proposing a change in the Building Permit Feessection. It is proposed to consolidate four of the fees for mechanical permitsinto one more general permit for mechanical.This will include gas piping and gas fireplace installations. In the Planning Fees section, staff is proposing to clarify languagefor an accessory structure permit. Thispermit is only for accessory structures that do not require a building permit. The attached Exhibit A-Building Permit Fees corrects some of the formulas within the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet used to develop the document. Although this changed some of the permit fee figures within the spreadsheet, the overall impact to the Building Official budget willbe negligible. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 2015-19 Revisions tothe Schedule of Fees for Services, to be effective April 1, 2015. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 107 CITYOFMENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, INNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015 - 19 RESOLUTIONREVISING SCHEDULEOF FEESFORSERVICES TO ADD A FEE FOR AFTER-THE-FACT PERMITS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CORRECTIONS WHEREAS , the City of Mendota Heights adopted Resolution 2015-01Revising Schedule of Fees for ServiceonJanuary 6, 2015;and WHEREAS , the City of Mendota Heights hasestablished by City Code thatallfee requirements establishedbe brought forth by resolution; and WHEREAS , the cost of services provided escalatesand newservicesrequire a fee to be set;and WHEREAS, it is appropriatethatfees be revised to cover the escalating costs of providing servicesand to cover new services. NOWTHEREFORE BE ITRESOLVED, thefee schedule be amended to add a new fee for After-the-Fact Permits beginning April 1, 2015. ALSO BE ITRESOLVED ,by the Mendota Heights City Council, that the attached Exhibit A, which revises the City ofMendota Heights fee schedule, is hereby adopted and approved. th Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 17day of March 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 108 ExhibitA 2015 City of Mendota Heights Fee Schedule Adopted by City Council on January 6, 2015 Amended by City Council on March 17, 2015 Effective April 1, 2015 Resolution 2015 - 19 page 109 2015 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Building AlterationsResidential/CommercialPer Attachment A Building Moving Permit$75 Building Permit FeeResidential/CommercialPer Attachment A Contractor LicenseAnnual$50/year Gas Fireplace w/new gas line1% of value/$100 minimum Mechanical Alteration orResidentialor Commercial1% of value/$ 75minimum Replacement (including gas piping and gas fire place installation) Mechanical Gas Piping75 Mechanical Install or Replacement - Heat Residential or Commercial1% of value/$100 minimum & AC combination Plan Review FeeResidential or CommercialPer Attachment A Plumbing Permit FeeResidential or Commercial1% of value/$ 75 minimum Public Utility or Improved Public ROW Residential/Commercial parcels not assessed at time of Amount assessed at time of improvement plus Connectionpast City improvement when surrounding lots were interest at rate offered to other assessments at assessed (includes newly created lots)time of improvement Roof PermitCommercial1% of value/$100 minimum/$1,000 maximum Roofing and Siding PermitResidential1% of value/$100 minimum Sewer PermitResidential/Commercial$75 Storm Sewer UtilityCommercial/Industrial$ 121.80 /acre Charge Storm Sewer UtilityResidential$7.25 Charge Water PermitResidential/Commercial$10 Window ReplacementResidential1% of value/$75 minimum page 110 2015 PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE Accessory Structure PermitUnder 120 sq. ft. For structures not requiring a $25 building permit After-the-Fact PermitFor actions undertaken without appropriate zoning Double fee, or $250, whichever is greater permits Comprehensive Plan* Escrow Required - See table$750 Amendment Concept Plan Review for PUD/Plat* Escrow Required - See table$250 Conditional Use Permit* Escrow Required - See table$350 Critical Area Permit* Escrow Required - See table$100 CUP for PUD* Escrow Required - See table$500 Fence Permit$25/flat fee Lot Split$350 Mining Permit$350 Park Dedication FeeNew Residential Lot Single and Multi-Family $ 2700 / dwelling unit Residential Park Dedication FeeNew Commercial / Industrial Lot10% of assessed value of unimproved land as determined by the County Assessor Rezoning* Escrow Required - See table$350 Subdivision* Escrow Required - See table$750 Sign PermitTriple fee charged if sign is erected w/o permitPer Attachment A Per Code 12-1D-15 B. 2 Temporary Sign Permit$25 VarianceResidential $200 *Escrow Required - See table VarianceCommercial or Industrial $250 * Escrow Required - See table Wetlands PermitResidential $150 * Escrow Required - See table Wetlands PermitCommercial or Industrial $200 * Escrow Required - See table Zoning Ordinance$250 Amendment page 111 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΏȁΏΏ$25.00$16.25͡ΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$488.25$317.36 ͡ΔΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΏȁΏΏ$28.25$18.36͡ΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$499.00$324.35 ͡ΕΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΏȁΏΏ$31.50$20.48͡ΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$509.75$331.34 ͡ΖΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΏȁΏΏ$34.75$22.59͡ΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$520.50$338.33 ͡ΗΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΏȁΏΏ$38.00$24.70͡ΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$531.25$345.31 ͡ΘΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$41.25$26.81͡ΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$542.00$352.30 ͡ΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΐΏΏȁΏΏ$44.50$28.93͡ΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$552.75$359.29 ͡ΐǾΐΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΑΏΏȁΏΏ$47.75$31.04͡ΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$563.50$366.28 ͡ΐǾΑΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΒΏΏȁΏΏ$51.00$33.15͡ΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$574.25$373.26 ͡ΐǾΒΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΓΏΏȁΏΏ$54.25$35.26͡ΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$585.00$380.25 ͡ΐǾΓΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΔΏΏȁΏΏ$57.50$37.38͡ΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$595.75$387.24 ͡ΐǾΔΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΕΏΏȁΏΏ$60.75$39.49͡ΓΑ ΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$606.50$394.23 ͡ΐǾΕΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΖΏΏȁΏΏ$64.00$41.60͡ΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$660.25$429.16 ͡ΐǾΖΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΗΏΏȁΏΏ$67.25$43.71͡ΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$628.00$408.20 ͡ΐǾΗΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΘΏΏȁΏΏ$70.50$45.83͡ΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$638.75$415.19 ͡ΐǾΘΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$73.75$47.94͡ΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$649.50$422.18 ͡ΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$88.50$57.53͡ΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$660.25$429.16 ͡ΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$103.25$67.11͡ΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$671.00$436.15 ͡ΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$118.00$76.70͡ΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$681.75$443.14 ͡ΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$132.75$86.29͡ΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$689.25$448.01 ͡ΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$147.50$95.88͡ΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$696.75$452.89 ͡ΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$162.25$105.46͡ΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$704.25$457.76 ͡ΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$177.00$115.05͡ΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$711.75$462.64 ͡ΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$191.75$124.64͡ΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$719.25$467.51 ͡ΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$206.50$134.23͡ΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ726.75$472.39 ͡ΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$221.25$143.81͡ΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$764.25$496.76 ͡ΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$236.00$153.40͡ΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$741.75$482.14 ͡ΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$250.75$162.99͡ΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$749.25$487.01 ͡ΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$265.50$172.58͡ΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$756.75$491.89 ͡ΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$280.25$182.16͡ΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$764.25$496.76 ͡ΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$295.00$191.75͡ΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$771.75$501.64 ͡ΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$309.75$201.34͡ΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$779.25$506.51 ͡ΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$324.50$210.93͡ΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$786.75$511.39 ͡ΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$339.25$220.51͡ΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$794.25$516.26 ͡ΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$354.00$230.10͡ΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$801.75$521.14 ͡ΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$368.75$239.69͡ΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$809.25$526.01 ͡ΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$383.50$249.28͡ΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$816.75$530.89 ͡ΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$398.25$258.86͡ΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$824.25$535.76 ͡ΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$413.00$268.45͡ΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$831.75$540.64 ͡ΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$423.75$275.44͡ΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$839.25$545.51 ͡ΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$434.50$282.43͡ΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$846.75$550.39 ͡ΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$445.25$289.41͡ΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$854.25$555.26 ͡ΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$456.00$296.40͡ΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$861.75$560.14 ͡ΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$466.75$303.39͡ΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$869.25$565.01 ͡ΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$477.50$310.38͡ΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$876.25$569.56 page 106 9f. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council, City Administrator FROM: Lorri Smith, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution 2015-19 Approving Revised Fee Schedule BACKGROUND With the passage of proposed Ordinance 473 regarding After-the-Fact Permit fees, the Fee Schedule needs to be amended to include newfees. Along with that change, we are proposing a few other amendments for clarification purposes. Included with this memo are the pages of the FeeSchedule that include the changes being proposed. Staff is proposing a change in the Building Permit Feessection. It is proposed to consolidate four of the fees for mechanical permitsinto one more general permit for mechanical.This will include gas piping and gas fireplace installations. In the Planning Fees section, staff is proposing to clarify languagefor an accessory structure permit. Thispermit is only for accessory structures that do not require a building permit. The attached Exhibit A-Building Permit Fees corrects some of the formulas within the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet used to develop the document. Although this changed some of the permit fee figures within the spreadsheet, the overall impact to the Building Official budget willbe negligible. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 2015-19 Revisions tothe Schedule of Fees for Services, to be effective April 1, 2015. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 107 CITYOFMENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, INNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015 - 19 RESOLUTIONREVISING SCHEDULEOF FEESFORSERVICES TO ADD A FEE FOR AFTER-THE-FACT PERMITS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS CORRECTIONS WHEREAS , the City of Mendota Heights adopted Resolution 2015-01Revising Schedule of Fees for ServiceonJanuary 6, 2015;and WHEREAS , the City of Mendota Heights hasestablished by City Code thatallfee requirements establishedbe brought forth by resolution; and WHEREAS , the cost of services provided escalatesand newservicesrequire a fee to be set;and WHEREAS, it is appropriatethatfees be revised to cover the escalating costs of providing servicesand to cover new services. NOWTHEREFORE BE ITRESOLVED, thefee schedule be amended to add a new fee for After-the-Fact Permits beginning April 1, 2015. ALSO BE ITRESOLVED ,by the Mendota Heights City Council, that the attached Exhibit A, which revises the City ofMendota Heights fee schedule, is hereby adopted and approved. th Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 17day of March 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 108 ExhibitA 2015 City of Mendota Heights Fee Schedule Adopted by City Council on January 6, 2015 Amended by City Council on March 17, 2015 Effective April 1, 2015 Resolution 2015 - 19 page 109 2015 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Building AlterationsResidential/CommercialPer Attachment A Building Moving Permit$75 Building Permit FeeResidential/CommercialPer Attachment A Contractor LicenseAnnual$50/year Gas Fireplace w/new gas line1% of value/$100 minimum Mechanical Alteration orResidentialor Commercial1% of value/$ 75minimum Replacement (including gas piping and gas fire place installation) Mechanical Gas Piping75 Mechanical Install or Replacement - Heat Residential or Commercial1% of value/$100 minimum & AC combination Plan Review FeeResidential or CommercialPer Attachment A Plumbing Permit FeeResidential or Commercial1% of value/$ 75 minimum Public Utility or Improved Public ROW Residential/Commercial parcels not assessed at time of Amount assessed at time of improvement plus Connectionpast City improvement when surrounding lots were interest at rate offered to other assessments at assessed (includes newly created lots)time of improvement Roof PermitCommercial1% of value/$100 minimum/$1,000 maximum Roofing and Siding PermitResidential1% of value/$100 minimum Sewer PermitResidential/Commercial$75 Storm Sewer UtilityCommercial/Industrial$ 121.80 /acre Charge Storm Sewer UtilityResidential$7.25 Charge Water PermitResidential/Commercial$10 Window ReplacementResidential1% of value/$75 minimum page 110 2015 PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE Accessory Structure PermitUnder 120 sq. ft. For structures not requiring a $25 building permit After-the-Fact PermitFor actions undertaken without appropriate zoning Double fee, or $250, whichever is greater permits Comprehensive Plan* Escrow Required - See table$750 Amendment Concept Plan Review for PUD/Plat* Escrow Required - See table$250 Conditional Use Permit* Escrow Required - See table$350 Critical Area Permit* Escrow Required - See table$100 CUP for PUD* Escrow Required - See table$500 Fence Permit$25/flat fee Lot Split$350 Mining Permit$350 Park Dedication FeeNew Residential Lot Single and Multi-Family $ 2700 / dwelling unit Residential Park Dedication FeeNew Commercial / Industrial Lot10% of assessed value of unimproved land as determined by the County Assessor Rezoning* Escrow Required - See table$350 Subdivision* Escrow Required - See table$750 Sign PermitTriple fee charged if sign is erected w/o permitPer Attachment A Per Code 12-1D-15 B. 2 Temporary Sign Permit$25 VarianceResidential $200 *Escrow Required - See table VarianceCommercial or Industrial $250 * Escrow Required - See table Wetlands PermitResidential $150 * Escrow Required - See table Wetlands PermitCommercial or Industrial $200 * Escrow Required - See table Zoning Ordinance$250 Amendment page 111 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΏȁΏΏ$25.00$16.25͡ΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$488.25$317.36 ͡ΔΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΏȁΏΏ$28.25$18.36͡ΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$499.00$324.35 ͡ΕΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΏȁΏΏ$31.50$20.48͡ΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$509.75$331.34 ͡ΖΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΏȁΏΏ$34.75$22.59͡ΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$520.50$338.33 ͡ΗΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΏȁΏΏ$38.00$24.70͡ΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$531.25$345.31 ͡ΘΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$41.25$26.81͡ΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$542.00$352.30 ͡ΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΐΏΏȁΏΏ$44.50$28.93͡ΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$552.75$359.29 ͡ΐǾΐΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΑΏΏȁΏΏ$47.75$31.04͡ΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$563.50$366.28 ͡ΐǾΑΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΒΏΏȁΏΏ$51.00$33.15͡ΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$574.25$373.26 ͡ΐǾΒΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΓΏΏȁΏΏ$54.25$35.26͡ΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$585.00$380.25 ͡ΐǾΓΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΔΏΏȁΏΏ$57.50$37.38͡ΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$595.75$387.24 ͡ΐǾΔΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΕΏΏȁΏΏ$60.75$39.49͡ΓΑ ΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$606.50$394.23 ͡ΐǾΕΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΖΏΏȁΏΏ$64.00$41.60͡ΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$660.25$429.16 ͡ΐǾΖΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΗΏΏȁΏΏ$67.25$43.71͡ΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$628.00$408.20 ͡ΐǾΗΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΘΏΏȁΏΏ$70.50$45.83͡ΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$638.75$415.19 ͡ΐǾΘΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$73.75$47.94͡ΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$649.50$422.18 ͡ΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$88.50$57.53͡ΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$660.25$429.16 ͡ΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$103.25$67.11͡ΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$671.00$436.15 ͡ΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$118.00$76.70͡ΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$681.75$443.14 ͡ΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$132.75$86.29͡ΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$689.25$448.01 ͡ΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$147.50$95.88͡ΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$696.75$452.89 ͡ΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$162.25$105.46͡ΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$704.25$457.76 ͡ΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$177.00$115.05͡ΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$711.75$462.64 ͡ΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$191.75$124.64͡ΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$719.25$467.51 ͡ΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$206.50$134.23͡ΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ726.75$472.39 ͡ΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$221.25$143.81͡ΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$764.25$496.76 ͡ΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$236.00$153.40͡ΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$741.75$482.14 ͡ΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$250.75$162.99͡ΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$749.25$487.01 ͡ΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$265.50$172.58͡ΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$756.75$491.89 ͡ΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$280.25$182.16͡ΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$764.25$496.76 ͡ΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$295.00$191.75͡ΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$771.75$501.64 ͡ΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$309.75$201.34͡ΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$779.25$506.51 ͡ΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$324.50$210.93͡ΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$786.75$511.39 ͡ΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$339.25$220.51͡ΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$794.25$516.26 ͡ΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$354.00$230.10͡ΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$801.75$521.14 ͡ΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$368.75$239.69͡ΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$809.25$526.01 ͡ΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$383.50$249.28͡ΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$816.75$530.89 ͡ΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$398.25$258.86͡ΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$824.25$535.76 ͡ΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$413.00$268.45͡ΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$831.75$540.64 ͡ΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$423.75$275.44͡ΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$839.25$545.51 ͡ΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$434.50$282.43͡ΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$846.75$550.39 ͡ΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$445.25$289.41͡ΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$854.25$555.26 ͡ΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$456.00$296.40͡ΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$861.75$560.14 ͡ΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$466.75$303.39͡ΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$869.25$565.01 ͡ΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$477.50$310.38͡ΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$876.25$569.56 page 112 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$884.25$574.76͡ΐΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,188.75$772.69 ͡ΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$891.75$579.64͡ΐΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,194.75$776.59 ͡ΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$899.25$584.51͡ΐΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,200.75$780.49 ͡ΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$906.75$589.39͡ΐΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,206.75$784.39 ͡ΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$914.25$594.26͡ΐΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,212.75$788.29 ͡ΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$921.75$599.14͡ΐΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,218.75$792.19 ͡ΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$929.25$604.01͡ΐΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,224.75$796.09 ͡ΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$936.75$608.89͡ΐΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,230.75$799.99 ͡ΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$944.25$613.76͡ΐΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,236.75$803.89 ͡ΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$951.75$618.64͡ΐΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,242.75$807.79 ͡ΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$959.25$623.51͡ΐΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,248.75$811.69 ͡ΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$966.75$628.39͡ΐΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,254.75$815.59 ͡ΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$974.25$633.26͡ΐΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,260.75$819.49 ͡ΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$981.75$638.14͡ΐΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,266.75$823.39 ͡ΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$989.25$643.01͡ΐΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,272.75$827.29 ͡ΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$996.75$647.89͡ΐΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,278.75$831.19 ͡ΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1004.25$652.76͡ΐΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,284.75$835.09 ͡ΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1011.75$657.64͡ΐΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,290.75$838.99 ͡ΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1019.25$662.51͡ΐΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,296.75$842.89 ͡ΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1026.75$667.39͡ΐΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,302.75$846.79 ͡ΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1034.25$672.26͡ΐΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,308.75$850.69 ͡ΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1041.75$677.14͡ΐΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,314.75$854.59 ͡ΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1049.25$682.01͡ΐΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,320.75$858.49 ͡ΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1056.75$686.89͡ΐΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,326.75$862.39 ͡ΐΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1062.75$690.79͡ΐΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,332.75$866.29 ͡ΐΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1068.75$694.69͡ΐΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,338.75$870.19 ͡ΐΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1074.75$698.59͡ΐΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,344.75$874.09 ͡ΐΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1080.75$702.49͡ΐΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,350.75$877.99 ͡ΐΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1086.75$706.39͡ΐΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,356.75$881.89 ͡ΐΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1092.75$710.29͡ΐΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,362.75$885.79 ͡ΐΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1098.75$714.19͡ΐΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,368.75$889.69 ͡ΐΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1104.75$718.09͡ΐΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,374.75$893.59 ͡ΐΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1110.75$721.99͡ΐΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,380.75$897.49 ͡ΐΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1116.75$725.89͡ΐΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,386.75$901.39 ͡ΐΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1122.75$729.79͡ΐΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,392.75$905.29 ͡ΐΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1128.75$733.69͡ΐΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,398.75$909.19 ͡ΐΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1134.75$737.59͡ΐΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,404.75$913.09 ͡ΐΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1140.75$741.49͡ΐΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,410.75$916.99 ͡ΐΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1146.75$745.39͡ΐΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,416.75$920.89 ͡ΐΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1152.75$749.29͡ΐΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,422.75$924.79 ͡ΐΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1158.75$753.19͡ΐΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,428.75$928.69 ͡ΐΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1164.75$757.09͡ΐΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,434.75$932.59 ͡ΐΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1170.75$760.99͡ΐΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,440.75$936.49 ͡ΐΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1176.75$764.89͡ΐΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,446.75$940.39 ͡ΐΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1182.75$768.79͡ΐΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,452.75$944.29 page 113 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΐΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,458.75$948.19͡ΑΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,728.75$1123.69 ͡ΐΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,464.75$952.09͡ΑΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,734.75$1127.59 ͡ΐΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,470.75$955.99͡ΑΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,740.75$1131.49 ͡ΐΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,476.75$959.89͡ΑΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,746.75$1135.39 ͡ΐΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,482.75$963.79͡ΑΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,752.75$1139.29 ͡ΐΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,488.75$967.69͡ΑΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,758.75$1143.19 ͡ΐΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,494.75$971.59͡ΑΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,764.75$1147.09 ͡ΐΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,500.75$975.49͡ΑΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,770.75$1150.99 ͡ΐΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,506.75$979.39͡ΑΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,776.75$1154.89 ͡ΐΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,512.75$983.29͡ΑΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,782.75$1158.79 ͡ΐΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,518.75$987.19͡ΑΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,788.75$1162.69 ͡ΐΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,524.75$991.09͡ΑΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,794.75$1166.59 ͡ΐΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,530.75$994.99͡ΑΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,800.75$1170.49 ͡ΐΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,536.75$998.89͡ΑΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,806.75$1174.39 ͡ΐΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,542.75$1002.79͡ΑΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,812.75$1178.29 ͡ΐΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,548.75$1006.69͡ΑΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,818.75$1182.19 ͡ΐΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,554.75$1010.59͡ΑΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,824.75$1186.09 ͡ΐΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,560.75$1014.49͡ΑΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,830.75$1189.99 ͡ΐΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,566.75$1018.39͡ΑΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,836.75$1193.89 ͡ΐΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,572.75$1022.29͡ΑΒΏǾΘΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,842.75$1197.79 ͡ΐΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,578.75$1026.19͡ΑΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,848.75$1201.69 ͡ΐΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,584.75$1030.09͡ΑΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,854.75$1205.59 ͡ΐΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,590.75$1033.99͡ΑΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,860.75$1209.49 ͡ΐΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,596.75$1037.89͡ΑΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,866.75$1213.39 ͡ΐΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,602.75$1041.79͡ΑΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,872.75$1217.29 ͡ΐΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,608.75$1045.69͡ΑΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,878.75$1221.19 ͡ΐΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,614.75$1049.59͡ΑΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,884.75$1225.09 ͡ΐΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,620.75$1053.49͡ΑΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,890.75$1228.99 ͡ΐΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,626.75$1057.39͡ΑΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,896.75$1232.89 ͡ΐΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,632.75$1061.29͡ΑΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,902.75$1236.79 ͡ΐΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,638.75$1065.19͡ΑΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,908.75$1240.69 ͡ΐΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,644.75$1069.09͡ΑΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,914.75$1244.59 ͡ΐΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,650.75$1072.99͡ΑΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,920.75$1248.49 ͡ΐΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,656.75$1076.89͡ΑΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,926.75$1252.39 ͡ΑΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,662.75$1080.79͡ΑΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,932.75$1256.29 ͡ΑΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,668.75$1084.69͡ΑΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,938.75$1260.19 ͡ΑΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,674.75$1088.59͡ΑΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,944.75$1264.09 ͡ΑΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,680.75$1092.49͡ΑΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,950.75$1267.99 ͡ΑΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,686.75$1096.39͡ΑΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,956.75$1271.89 ͡ΑΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,692.75$1100.29͡ΑΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,962.75$1275.79 ͡ΑΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,698.75$1104.19͡ΑΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,968.75$1279.69 ͡ΑΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,704.75$1108.09͡ΑΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,974.75$1283.59 ͡ΑΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,710.75$1111.99͡ΑΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,980.75$1287.49 ͡ΑΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,716.75$1115.89͡ΑΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,986.75$1291.39 ͡ΑΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,722.75$1119.79͡ΑΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,992.75$1295.29 page 114 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΑΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$1,998.75$1299.19͡ΒΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,268.75$1474.69 ͡ΑΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,004.75$1303.09͡ΒΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,274.75$1478.59 ͡ΑΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,010.75$1306.99͡ΒΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,280.75$1482.49 ͡ΑΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,016.75$1310.89͡ΒΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,286.75$1486.39 ͡ΑΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,022.75$1314.79͡ΒΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,292.75$1490.29 ͡ΑΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,028.75$1318.69͡ΒΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,298.75$1494.19 ͡ΑΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,034.75$1322.59͡ΒΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,304.75$1498.09 ͡ΑΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,040.75$1326.49͡ΒΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,310.75$1501.99 ͡ΑΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,046.75$1330.39͡ΒΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,316.75$1505.89 ͡ΑΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,052.75$1334.29͡ΒΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,322.75$1509.79 ͡ΑΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,058.75$1338.19͡ΒΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,328.75$1513.69 ͡ΑΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,064.75$1342.09͡ΒΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,334.75$1517.59 ͡ΑΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,070.75$1345.99͡ΒΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,340.75$1521.49 ͡ΑΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,076.75$1349.89͡ΒΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,346.75$1525.39 ͡ΐΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,082.75$1353.79͡ΒΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,352.75$1529.29 ͡ΑΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,088.75$1357.69͡ΒΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,358.75$1533.19 ͡ΑΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,094.75$1361.59͡ΒΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,364.75$1537.09 ͡ΑΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,100.75$1365.49͡ΒΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,370.75$1540.99 ͡ΑΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,106.75$1369.39͡ΒΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,376.75$1544.89 ͡ΑΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,112.75$1373.29͡ΒΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,382.75$1548.79 ͡ΑΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,118.75$1377.19͡ΒΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,388.75$1552.69 ͡ΑΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,124.75$1381.09͡ΒΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,394.75$1556.59 ͡ΑΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,130.75$1384.99͡ΒΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,400.75$1560.49 ͡ΑΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,136.75$1388.89͡ΒΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,406.75$1564.39 ͡ΑΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,142.75$1392.79͡ΒΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,412.75$1568.29 ͡ΑΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,148.75$1396.69͡ΒΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,418.75$1572.19 ͡ΑΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,154.75$1400.59͡ΒΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,424.75$1576.09 ͡ΑΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,160.75$1404.49͡ΒΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,430.75$1579.99 ͡ΑΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,166.75$1408.39͡ΒΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,436.75$1583.89 ͡ΑΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,172.75$1412.29͡ΒΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,442.75$1587.79 ͡ΑΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,178.75$1416.19͡ΒΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,448.75$1591.69 ͡ΑΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,184.75$1420.09͡ΒΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,454.75$1595.59 ͡ΑΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,190.75$1423.99͡ΒΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,460.75$1599.49 ͡ΑΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,196.75$1427.89͡ΒΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,466.75$1603.39 ͡ΑΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,202.75$1431.79͡ΒΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,472.75$1607.29 ͡ΑΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,208.75$1435.69͡ΒΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,478.75$1611.19 ͡ΑΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,214.75$1439.59͡ΒΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,484.75$1615.09 ͡ΑΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,220.75$1443.49͡ΒΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,490.75$1618.99 ͡ΑΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,226.75$1447.39͡ΒΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,496.75$1622.89 ͡ΑΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,232.75$1451.29͡ΒΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,502.75$1626.79 ͡ΑΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,238.75$1455.19͡ΒΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,508.75$1630.69 ͡ΑΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,244.75$1459.09͡ΒΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,514.75$1634.59 ͡ΑΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΑΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,250.75$1462.99͡ΒΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,520.75$1638.49 ͡ΑΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,256.75$1466.89͡ΒΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,526.75$1642.39 ͡ΒΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,262.75$1470.79͡ΒΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,532.75$1646.29 page 115 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΒΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,538.75$1650.19͡ΒΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,808.75$1825.69 ͡ΒΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,544.75$1654.09͡ΒΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,814.75$1829.59 ͡ΒΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,550.75$1657.99͡ΒΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,820.75$1833.49 ͡ΒΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,556.75$1661.89͡ΒΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,826.75$1837.39 ͡ΒΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,562.75$1665.79͡ΒΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,832.75$1841.29 ͡ΒΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,568.75$1669.69͡ΒΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,838.75$1845.19 ͡ΒΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,574.75$1673.59͡ΒΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,844.75$1849.09 ͡ΒΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,580.75$1677.49͡ΒΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,850.75$1852.99 ͡ΒΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,586.75$1681.39͡ΒΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,856.75$1856.89 ͡ΒΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,592.75$1685.29͡ΓΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,862.75$1860.79 ͡ΒΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏȁ ³® ͡ΒΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,598.75$1689.19͡ΓΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,868.75$1864.69 ͡ΒΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,604.75$1693.09͡ΓΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,874.75$1868.59 ͡ΒΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,610.75$1696.99͡ΓΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,880.75$1872.49 ͡ΒΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,616.75$1700.89͡ΓΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,886.75$1876.39 ͡ΒΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,622.75$1704.79͡ΓΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,892.75$1880.29 ͡ΒΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,628.75$1708.69͡ΓΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,898.75$1884.19 ͡ΒΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,634.75$1712.59͡ΓΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,904.75$1888.09 ͡ΒΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,640.75$1716.49͡ΓΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,910.75$1891.99 ͡ΒΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,646.75$1720.39͡ΓΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,916.75$1895.89 ͡ΒΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,652.75$1724.29͡ΓΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,922.75$1899.79 ͡ΒΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,658.75$1728.19͡ΓΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,928.75$1903.69 ͡ΒΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,664.75$1732.09͡ΓΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,934.75$1907.59 ͡ΒΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,670.75$1735.99͡ΓΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,940.75$1911.49 ͡ΒΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,676.75$1739.89͡ΓΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,946.75$1915.39 ͡ΒΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,682.75$1743.79͡ΓΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,952.75$1919.29 ͡ΒΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,688.75$1747.69͡ΓΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,958.75$1923.19 ͡ΒΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,694.75$1751.59͡ΓΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,964.75$1927.09 ͡ΒΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,700.75$1755.49͡ΓΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,970.75$1930.99 ͡ΒΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,706.75$1759.39͡ΓΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,976.75$1934.89 ͡ΒΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,712.75$1763.29͡ΓΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,982.75$1938.79 ͡ΒΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,718.75$1767.19͡ΓΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,988.75$1942.69 ͡ΒΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,724.75$1771.09͡ΓΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,994.75$1946.59 ͡ΒΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,730.75$1774.99͡ΓΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,000.75$1950.49 ͡ΒΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,736.75$1778.89͡ΓΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,006.75$1954.39 ͡ΒΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,742.75$1782.79͡ΓΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,012.75$1958.29 ͡ΒΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,748.75$1786.69͡ΓΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,018.75$1962.19 ͡ΒΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,754.75$1790.59͡ΓΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,024.75$1966.09 ͡ΒΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,760.75$1794.49͡ΓΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΑΘǾΏΏΏ͑ΏΏ$3,030.75$1969.99 ͡ΒΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,766.75$1798.39͡ΓΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,036.75$1973.89 ͡ΒΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,772.75$1802.29͡ΓΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,042.75$1977.79 ͡ΒΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,778.75$1806.19͡ΓΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,048.75$1981.69 ͡ΒΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,784.75$1810.09͡ΓΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,054.75$1985.59 ͡ΒΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,790.75$1813.99͡ΓΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,060.75$1989.49 ͡ΒΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,796.75$1817.89͡ΓΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,066.75$1993.39 ͡ΒΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΒΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$2,802.75$1821.79͡ΓΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,072.75$1997.29 page 116 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΓΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,078.75$2001.19͡ΓΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,348.75$2176.69 ͡ΓΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,084.75$2005.09͡ΓΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,354.75$2180.59 ͡ΓΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,090.75$2008.99͡ΓΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,360.75$2184.49 ͡ΓΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,096.75$2012.89͡ΓΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,366.75$2188.39 ͡ΓΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,102.75$2016.79͡ΓΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,372.75$2192.29 ͡ΓΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,108.75$2020.69͡ΓΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,378.75$2196.19 ͡ΓΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,114.75$2024.59͡ΓΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,384.75$2200.09 ͡ΓΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,120.75$2028.49͡ΓΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,390.75$2203.99 ͡ΓΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,126.75$2032.39͡ΓΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,396.75$2207.89 ͡ΓΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,132.75$2036.29͡ΓΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,402.75$2211.79 ͡ΓΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,138.75$2040.19͡ΓΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,408.75$2215.69 ͡ΓΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,144.75$2044.09͡ΓΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,414.75$2219.59 ͡ΓΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,150.75$2047.99͡ΓΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,420.75$2223.49 ͡ΓΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,156.75$2051.89͡ΓΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,426.75$2227.39 ͡ΓΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,162.75$2055.79͡ΓΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,432.75$2231.29 ͡ΓΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,168.75$2059.69͡ΓΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,438.75$2235.19 ͡ΓΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,174.75$2063.59͡ΓΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,444.75$2239.09 ͡ΓΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,180.75$2067.49͡ΓΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,450.75$2242.99 ͡ΓΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,186.75$2071.39͡ΓΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,456.75$2246.89 ͡ΓΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,192.75$2075.29͡ΔΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,461.75$2250.14 ͡ΓΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,198.75$2079.19͡ΔΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,466.75$2253.39 ͡ΓΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,204.75$2083.09͡ΔΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,471.75$2256.64 ͡ΓΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,210.75$2086.99͡ΔΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,476.75$2259.89 ͡ΓΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,216.75$2090.89͡ΔΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,481.75$2263.14 ͡ΓΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,222.75$2094.79͡ΔΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,486.75$2266.39 ͡ΓΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,228.75$2098.69͡ΔΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,491.75$2269.64 ͡ΓΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,234.75$2102.59͡ΔΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,496.75$2272.89 ͡ΓΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,240.75$2106.49͡ΔΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,501.75$2276.14 ͡ΓΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,246.75$2110.39͡ΔΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,506.75$2279.39 ͡ΓΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,252.75$2114.29͡ΔΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,511.75$2282.64 ͡ΓΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΘ ³® ͡ΓΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,258.75$2118.19͡ΔΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,516.75$2285.89 ͡ΓΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,264.75$2122.09͡ΔΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,521.75$2289.14 ͡ΓΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,270.75$2125.99͡ΔΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,526.75$2292.39 ͡ΓΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,276.75$2129.89͡ΔΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,531.75$2295.64 ͡ΓΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,282.75$2133.79͡ΔΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,536.75$2298.89 ͡ΓΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,288.75$2137.69͡ΔΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,541.75$2302.14 ͡ΓΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,294.75$2141.59͡ΔΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,546.75$2305.39 ͡ΓΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,300.75$2145.49͡ΔΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,551.75$2308.64 ͡ΓΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,306.75$2149.39͡ΔΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,556.75$2311.89 ͡ΓΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,312.75$2153.29͡ΔΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,561.75$2315.14 ͡ΓΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,318.75$2157.19͡ΔΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,566.75$2318.39 ͡ΓΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,324.75$2161.09͡ΔΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,571.75$2321.64 ͡ΓΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,330.75$2164.99͡ΔΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,576.75$2324.89 ͡ΓΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,336.75$2168.89͡ΔΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,581.75$2328.14 ͡ΓΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΓΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,342.75$2172.79͡ΔΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,586.75$2331.39 page 117 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΔΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,591.75$2334.64͡ΔΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,816.75$2480.89 ͡ΔΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,596.75$2337.89͡ΔΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,821.75$2484.14 ͡ΔΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,601.75$2341.14͡ΔΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,826.75$2487.39 ͡ΔΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,606.75$2344.39͡ΔΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,831.75$2490.64 ͡ΔΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,611.75$2347.64͡ΔΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,836.75$2493.89 ͡ΔΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,616.75$2350.89͡ΔΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,841.75$2497.14 ͡ΔΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,621.75$2354.14͡ΔΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,846.75$2500.39 ͡ΔΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,626.75$2357.39͡ΔΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,851.75$2503.64 ͡ΔΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,631.75$2360.64͡ΔΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,856.75$2506.89 ͡ΔΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,636.75$2363.89͡ΔΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,861.75$2510.14 ͡ΔΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,641.75$2367.14͡ΔΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,866.75$2513.39 ͡ΔΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,646.75$2370.39͡ΔΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,871.75$2516.64 ͡ΔΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,651.75$2373.64͡ΔΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,876.75$2519.89 ͡ΔΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,656.75$2376.89͡ΔΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,881.75$2523.14 ͡ΔΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,661.75$2380.14͡ΔΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,886.75$2526.39 ͡ΔΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,666.75$2383.39͡ΔΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,891.75$2529.64 ͡ΔΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,671.75$2386.64͡ΔΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,896.75$2532.89 ͡ΔΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,676.75$2389.89͡ΔΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,901.75$2536.14 ͡ΔΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,681.75$2393.14͡ΔΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,906.75$2539.39 ͡ΔΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,686.75$2396.39͡ΔΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,911.75$2542.64 ͡ΔΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,691.75$2399.64͡ΔΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,916.75$2545.89 ͡ΔΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,696.75$2402.89͡ΔΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,921.75$2549.14 ͡ΔΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,701.75$2406.14͡ΔΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,926.75$2552.39 ͡ΔΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,706.75$2409.39͡ΔΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,931.75$2555.64 ͡ΔΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,711.75$2412.64͡ΔΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,936.75$2558.89 ͡ΔΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,716.75$2415.89͡ΔΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,941.75$2562.14 ͡ΔΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,721.75$2419.14͡ΔΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,946.75$2565.39 ͡ΔΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,726.75$2422.39͡ΔΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,951.75$2568.64 ͡ΔΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,731.75$2425.64͡ΔΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,956.75$2571.89 ͡ΔΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,736.75$2428.89͡ΕΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,961.75$2575.14 ͡ΔΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,741.75$2432.14͡ΕΏΐ ǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,966.75$2578.39 ͡ΔΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,746.75$2435.39͡ΕΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,971.75$2581.64 ͡ΔΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,751.75$2438.64͡ΕΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,976.75$2584.89 ͡ΔΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,756.75$2441.89͡ΕΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,981.75$2588.14 ͡ΔΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,761.75$2445.14͡ΕΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,986.75$2591.39 ͡ΔΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,766.75$2448.39͡ΕΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,991.75$2594.64 ͡ΔΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,771.75$2451.64͡ΕΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,996.75$2597.89 ͡ΔΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,776.75$2454.89͡ΕΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,001.75$2601.14 ͡ΔΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,781.75$2458.14͡ΕΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,006.75$2604.39 ͡ΔΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,786.75$2461.39͡ΕΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,011.75$2607.64 ͡ΔΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,791.75$2464.64͡ΕΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,016.75$2610.89 ͡ΔΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,796.75$2467.89͡ΕΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,021.75$2614.14 ͡ΔΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,801.75$2471.14͡ΕΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,026.75$2617.39 ͡ΔΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,806.75$2474.39͡ΕΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,031.75$2620.64 ͡ΔΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΔΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$3,811.75$2477.64͡ΕΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,036.75$2623.89 page 118 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΕΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,041.75$2627.14͡ΕΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,266.75$2773.39 ͡ΕΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,046.75$2630.39͡ΕΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,271.75$2776.64 ͡ΕΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,051.75$2633.64͡ΕΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,276.75$2779.89 ͡ΕΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,056.75$2636.89͡ΕΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,281.75$2783.14 ͡ΕΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,061.75$2640.14͡ΕΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,286.75$2786.39 ͡ΕΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,066.75$2643.39͡ΕΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,291.75$2789.64 ͡ΕΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,071.75$2646.64͡ΕΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,296.75$2792.89 ͡ΕΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,076.75$2649.89͡ΕΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,301.75$2796.14 ͡ΕΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,081.75$2653.14͡ΕΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,306.75$2799.39 ͡ΕΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,086.75$2656.39͡ΕΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,311.75$2802.64 ͡ΕΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,091.75$2659.64͡ΕΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,316.75$2805.89 ͡ΕΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,096.75$2662.89͡ΕΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,321.75$2809.14 ͡ΕΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,101.75$2666.14͡ΕΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,326.75$2812.39 ͡ΕΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,106.75$2669.39͡ΕΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,331.75$2815.64 ͡ΕΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,111.75$2672.64͡ΕΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,336.75$2818.89 ͡ΕΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,116.75$2675.89͡ΕΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,341.75$2822.14 ͡ΕΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,121.75$2679.14͡ΕΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,346.75$2825.39 ͡ΕΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,126.75$2682.39͡ΕΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,351.75$2828.64 ͡ΕΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,131.75$2685.64͡ΕΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,356.75$2831.89 ͡ΕΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,136.75$2688.89͡ΕΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,361.75$2835.14 ͡ΕΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,141.75$2692.14͡ΕΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,366.75$2838.39 ͡ΕΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,146.75$2695.39͡ΕΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,371.75$2841.64 ͡ΕΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,151.75$2698.64͡ΕΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,376.75$2844.89 ͡ΕΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,156.75$2701.89͡ΕΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,381.75$2848.14 ͡ΕΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,161.75$2705.14͡ΕΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,386.75$2851.39 ͡ΕΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,166.75$2708.39͡ΕΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,391.75$2854.64 ͡ΕΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,171.75$2711.64͡ΕΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,396.75$2857.89 ͡ΕΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,176.75$2714.89͡ΕΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,401.75$2861.14 ͡ΕΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,181.75$2718.14͡ΕΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,406.75$2864.39 ͡ΕΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,186.75$2721.39͡ΕΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,411.75$2867.64 ͡ΕΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,191.75$2724.64͡ΕΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,416.75$2870.89 ͡ΕΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,196.75$2727.89͡ΕΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,421.75$2874.14 ͡ΕΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,201.75$2731.14͡ΕΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,426.75$2877.39 ͡ΕΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,206.75$2734.39͡ΕΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,431.75$2880.64 ͡ΕΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,211.75$2737.64͡ΕΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,436.75$2883.89 ͡ΕΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,216.75$2740.89͡ΕΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,441.75$2887.14 ͡ΕΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,221.75$2744.14͡ΕΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,446.75$2890.39 ͡ΕΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,226.75$2747.39͡ΕΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,451.75$2893.64 ͡ΕΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,231.75$2750.64͡ΕΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,456.75$2896.89 ͡ΕΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,236.75$2753.89͡ΖΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,461.75$2900.14 ͡ΕΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,241.75$2757.14͡ΖΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,466.75$2903.39 ͡ΕΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,246.75$2760.39͡ΖΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,471.75$2906.64 ͡ΕΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,251.75$2763.64͡ΖΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,476.75$2909.89 ͡ΕΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,256.75$2766.89͡ΖΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,481.75$2913.14 ͡ΕΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΕΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,261.75$2770.14͡ΖΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,486.75$2916.39 page 119 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΖΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,491.75$2919.64͡ΖΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,716.75$3065.89 ͡ΖΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,496.75$2922.89͡ΖΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,721.75$3069.14 ͡ΖΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,501.75$2926.14͡ΖΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,726.75$3072.39 ͡ΖΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,506.75$2929.39͡ΖΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,731.75$3075.64 ͡ΖΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,511.75$2932.64͡ΖΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,736.75$3078.89 ͡ΖΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,516.75$2935.89͡ΖΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,741.75$3082.14 ͡ΖΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,521.75$2939.14͡ΖΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,746.75$3085.39 ͡ΖΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,526.75$2942.39͡ΖΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,751.75$3088.64 ͡ΖΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,531.75$2945.64͡ΖΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,756.75$3091.89 ͡ΖΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,536.75$2948.89͡ΖΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,761.75$3095.14 ͡ΖΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,541.75$2952.14͡ΖΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,766.75$3098.39 ͡ΖΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,546.75$2955.39͡ΖΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,771.75$3101.64 ͡ΖΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,551.75$2958.64͡ΖΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,776.75$3104.89 ͡ΖΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,556.75$2961.89͡ΖΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,781.75$3108.14 ͡ΖΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,561.75$2965.14͡ΖΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,786.75$3111.39 ͡ΖΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,566.75$2968.39͡ΖΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,791.75$3114.64 ͡ΖΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,571.75$2971.64͡ΖΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,796.75$3117.89 ͡ΖΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,576.75$2974.89͡ΖΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,801.75$3121.14 ͡ΖΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,581.75$2978.14͡ΖΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,806.75$3124.39 ͡ΖΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,586.75$2981.39͡ΖΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,811.75$3127.64 ͡ΖΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,591.75$2984.64͡ΖΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,816.75$3130.89 ͡ΖΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,596.75$2987.89͡ΖΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,821.75$3134.14 ͡ΖΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,601.75$2991.14͡ΖΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,826.75$3137.39 ͡ΖΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,606.75$2994.39͡ΖΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,831.75$3140.64 ͡ΖΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,611.75$2997.64͡ΖΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,836.75$3143.89 ͡ΖΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,616.75$3000.89͡ΖΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,841.75$3147.14 ͡ΖΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,621.75$3004.14͡ΖΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,846.75$3150.39 ͡ΖΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,626.75$3007.39͡ΖΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,851.75$3153.64 ͡ΖΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,631.75$3010.64͡ΖΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,856.75$3156.89 ͡ΖΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,636.75$3013.89͡ΖΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,861.75$3160.14 ͡ΖΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,641.75$3017.14͡ΖΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,866.75$3163.39 ͡ΖΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,646.75$3020.39͡ΖΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,871.75$3166.64 ͡ΖΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,651.75$3023.64͡ΖΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,876.75$3169.89 ͡ΖΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,656.75$3026.89͡ΖΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,881.75$3173.14 ͡ΖΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,661.75$3030.14͡ΖΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,886.75$3176.39 ͡ΖΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,666.75$3033.39͡ΖΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,891.75$3179.64 ͡ΖΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,671.75$3036.64͡ΖΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,896.75$3182.89 ͡ΖΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,676.75$3039.89͡ΖΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,901.75$3186.14 ͡ΖΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,681.75$3043.14͡ΖΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,906.75$3189.39 ͡ΖΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,686.75$3046.39͡ΖΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,911.75$3192.64 ͡ΖΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,691.75$3049.64͡ΖΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,916.75$3195.89 ͡ΖΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,696.75$3052.89͡ΖΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,921.75$3199.14 ͡ΖΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,701.75$3056.14͡ΖΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,926.75$3202.39 ͡ΖΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,706.75$3059.39͡ΖΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,931.75$3205.64 ͡ΖΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,711.75$3062.64͡ΖΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,936.75$3208.89 page 120 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΖΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,941.75$3212.14͡ΗΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,166.75$3358.39 ͡ΖΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,946.75$3215.39͡ΗΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,171.75$3361.64 ͡ΖΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΖΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,951.75$3218.64͡ΗΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,176.75$3364.89 ͡ΖΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,956.75$3221.89͡ΗΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,181.75$3368.14 ͡ΗΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,961.75$3225.14͡ΗΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,186.75$3371.39 ͡ΗΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,966.75$3228.39͡ΗΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,191.75$3374.64 ͡ΗΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,971.75$3231.64͡ΗΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,196.75$3377.89 ͡ΗΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,976.75$3234.89͡ΗΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,201.75$3381.14 ͡ΗΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,981.75$3238.14͡ΗΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,206.75$3384.39 ͡ΗΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,986.75$3241.39͡ΗΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,211.75$3387.64 ͡ΗΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,991.75$3244.64͡ΗΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,216.75$3390.89 ͡ΗΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$4,996.75$3247.89͡ΗΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,221.75$3394.14 ͡ΗΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,001.75$3251.14͡ΗΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,226.75$3397.39 ͡ΗΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,006.75$3254.39͡ΗΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,231.75$3400.64 ͡ΗΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,011.75$3257.64͡ΗΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,236.75$3403.89 ͡ΗΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,016.75$3260.89͡ΗΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΘ ³® ͡ΗΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,241.75$3407.14 ͡ΗΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,021.75$3264.14͡ΗΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,246.75$3410.39 ͡ΗΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,026.75$3267.39͡ΗΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,251.75$3413.64 ͡ΗΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,031.75$3270.64͡ΗΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,256.75$3416.89 ͡ΗΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,036.75$3273.89͡ΗΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,261.75$3420.14 ͡ΗΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,041.75$3277.14͡ΗΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,266.75$3423.39 ͡ΗΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,046.75$3280.39͡ΗΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,271.75$3426.64 ͡ΗΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,051.75$3283.64͡ΗΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,276.75$3429.89 ͡ΗΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,056.75$3286.89͡ΗΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,281.75$3433.14 ͡ΗΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,061.75$3290.14͡ΗΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,286.75$3436.39 ͡ΗΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,066.75$3293.39͡ΗΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,291.75$3439.64 ͡ΗΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,071.75$3296.64͡ΗΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,296.75$3442.89 ͡ΗΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,076.75$3299.89͡ΗΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,301.75$3446.14 ͡ΗΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,081.75$3303.14͡ΗΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,306.75$3449.39 ͡ΗΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,086.75$3306.39͡ΗΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,311.75$3452.64 ͡ΗΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,091.75$3309.64͡ΗΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,316.75$3455.89 ͡ΗΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,096.75$3312.89͡ΗΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,321.75$3459.14 ͡ΗΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,101.75$3316.14͡ΗΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,326.75$3462.39 ͡ΗΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,106.75$3319.39͡ΗΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,331.75$3465.64 ͡ΗΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,111.75$3322.64͡ΗΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,336.75$3468.89 ͡ΗΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,116.75$3325.89͡ΗΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,341.75$3472.14 ͡ΗΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,121.75$3329.14͡ΗΖΖǾΏΏ )ȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,346.75$3475.39 ͡ΗΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,126.75$3332.39͡ΗΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,351.75$3478.64 ͡ΗΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,131.75$3335.64͡ΗΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,356.75$3481.89 ͡ΗΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,136.75$3338.89͡ΗΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,361.75$3485.14 ͡ΗΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,141.75$3342.14͡ΗΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,366.75$3488.39 ͡ΗΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,146.75$3345.39͡ΗΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,371.75$3491.64 ͡ΗΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,151.75$3348.64͡ΗΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,376.75$3494.89 ͡ΗΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,156.75$3351.89͡ΗΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,381.75$3498.14 ͡ΗΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,161.75$3355.14͡ΗΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,386.75$3501.39 page 121 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΗΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,391.75$3504.64͡ΘΒΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,616.75$3650.89 ͡ΗΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,396.75$3507.89͡ΘΒΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,621.75$3654.14 ͡ΗΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,401.75$3511.14͡ΘΒΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,626.75$3657.39 ͡ΗΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,406.75$3514.39͡ΘΒΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,631.75$3660.64 ͡ΗΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,411.75$3517.64͡ΘΒΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,636.75$3663.89 ͡ΗΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,416.75$3520.89͡ΘΒΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,641.75$3667.14 ͡ΗΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,421.75$3524.14͡ΘΒΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,646.75$3670.39 ͡ΗΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,426.75$3527.39͡ΘΒΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,651.75$3673.64 ͡ΗΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,431.75$3530.64͡ΘΒΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,656.75$3676.89 ͡ΗΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,436.75$3533.89͡ΘΓΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,661.75$3680.14 ͡ΗΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,441.75$3537.14͡ΘΓΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,666.75$3683.39 ͡ΗΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,446.75$3540.39͡ΘΓΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,671.75$3686.64 ͡ΗΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΗΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,451.75$3543.64͡ΘΓΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,676.75$3689.89 ͡ΗΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,456.75$3546.89͡ΘΓΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,681.75$3693.14 ͡ΘΏΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,461.75$3550.14͡ΘΓΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,686.75$3696.39 ͡ΘΏΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,466.75$3553.39͡ΘΓΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,691.75$3699.64 ͡ΘΏΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,471.75$3556.64͡ΘΓΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,696.75$3702.89 ͡ΘΏΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,476.75$3559.89͡ΘΓΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΓΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,701.75$3706.14 ͡ΘΏΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,481.75$3563.14͡ΘΓΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,706.75$3709.39 ͡ΘΏΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,486.75$3566.39͡ΘΔΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,711.75$3712.64 ͡ΘΏΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,491.75$3569.64͡ΘΔΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,716.75$3715.89 ͡ΘΏΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,496.75$3572.89͡ΘΔΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,721.75$3719.14 ͡ΘΏΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΏΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,501.75$3576.14͡ΘΔΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,726.75$3722.39 ͡ΘΏΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,506.75$3579.39͡ΘΔΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,731.75$3725.64 ͡ΘΐΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,511.75$3582.64͡ΘΔΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,736.75$3728.89 ͡ΘΐΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,516.75$3585.89͡ΘΔΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,741.75$3732.14 ͡ΘΐΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,521.75$3589.14͡ΘΔΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,746.75$3735.39 ͡ΘΐΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,526.75$3592.39͡ΘΔΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΔΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,751.75$3738.64 ͡ΘΐΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,531.75$3595.64͡ΘΔΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,756.75$3741.89 ͡ΘΐΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,536.75$3598.89͡ΘΕΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,761.75$3745.14 ͡ΘΐΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,541.75$3602.14͡ΘΕΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,766.75$3748.39 ͡ΘΐΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,546.75$3605.39͡ΘΕΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,771.75$3751.64 ͡ΘΐΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΐΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,551.75$3608.64͡ΘΕΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,776.75$3754.89 ͡ΘΐΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,556.75$3611.89͡ΘΕΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,781.75$3758.14 ͡ΘΑΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,561.75$3615.14͡ΘΕΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,786.75$3761.39 ͡ΘΑΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,566.75$3618.39͡ΘΕΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,791.75$3764.64 ͡ΘΑΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,571.75$3621.64͡ΘΕΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,796.75$3767.89 ͡ΘΑΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,576.75$3624.89͡ΘΕΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΕΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,801.75$3771.14 ͡ΘΑΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,581.75$3628.14͡ΘΕΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,806.75$3774.39 ͡ΘΑΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,586.75$3631.39͡ΘΖΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,811.75$3777.64 ͡ΘΑΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,591.75$3634.64͡ΘΖΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,816.75$3780.89 ͡ΘΑΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,596.75$3637.89͡ΘΖΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,821.75$3784.14 ͡ΘΑΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΑΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,601.75$3641.14͡ΘΖΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,826.75$3787.39 ͡ΘΑΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,606.75$3644.39͡ΘΖΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,831.75$3790.64 ͡ΘΒΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΒΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,611.75$3647.64͡ΘΖΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,836.75$3793.89 page 122 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation PermitPlanPermitPlan ValuationValuation FeesReviewFeesReview ͡ΘΖΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,841.75$3797.14 ͡ΘΖΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,846.75$3800.39 ͡ΘΖΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΖΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,851.75$3803.64 ͡ΘΖΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,856.75$3806.89 ͡ΘΗΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,861.75$3810.14 ͡ΘΗΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,866.75$3813.39 ͡ΘΗΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,871.75$3816.64 ͡ΘΗΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,876.75$3819.89 ͡ΘΗΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,881.75$3823.14 ͡ΘΗΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,886.75$3826.39 ͡ΘΗΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,891.75$3829.64 ͡ΘΗΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,896.75$3832.89 ͡ΘΗΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΗΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,901.75$3836.14 ͡ΘΗΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,906.75$3839.39 ͡ΘΘΏǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΐǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,911.75$3842.64 ͡ΘΘΐǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΑǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,916.75$3845.89 ͡ΘΘΑǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΒǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,921.75$3849.14 ͡ΘΘΒǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΓǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,926.75$3852.39 ͡ΘΘΓǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΔǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,931.75$3855.64 ͡ΘΘΔǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΕǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,936.75$3858.89 ͡ΘΘΕǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΖǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,941.75$3862.14 ͡ΘΘΖǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΗǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,946.75$3865.39 ͡ΘΘΗǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΘΘΘǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,951.75$3868.64 ͡ΘΘΘǾΏΏΐȁΏΏ ³® ͡ΐǾΏΏΏǾΏΏΏȁΏΏ$5,956.75$3871.89 page 123 9g. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance 471 Adopting Proposed Code Amendments for Wetlands Permits BACKGROUND Staff has identified potential code amendments concerning the wetlands permit administrative approval process for discussion by the City Council. The goal is to clean-up and streamline the approvalprocess for certain activities, much like what was done for fences and signs in the past. A summary of the proposed activities that would be eligible for administrative approval include: Construction or repair of a private residential fence Construction of an accessory structure not requiring a building permit Emergency repairs to structures/land Removal of invasive species/noxious weeds – by agreementwith the City Removal of dead/dying vegetation – by agreement with the City The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at the February 24meeting; there were no public comments. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION ThePlanning CommissionrecommendedapprovalofDRAFT Ordinance 47, as describedin Planning Case 2014-37. IftheCity Councildesires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting ORDINANCE 471 CONCERNING WETLANDS PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. Thismatterrequires a simple majority vote. page 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 471 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12-2-6 AND 12-2-10 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, DAKOTACOUNTY, CONCERNING WETLANDS PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Section 1. Section 12-2-6(C) is hereby amended to read as follows: C. Administrative Procedures And Exemptions: 1.All proposals to adjust a W district boundary line shall follow the same administrative procedures as outlined in section 12-1L-7of this title. 2.Permit applicationshall be processed in accordance with the procedures specified for the processing of a conditional use permit under the city zoning ordinance. 3.Where a project is proposed within the wetlands district, the city administrator may, at his or her discretion,direct the appropriate staff member to review the permit request for administrative approval when all of the following conditions exist: a.No change from existing grades. b.No increase in building or structure square footage. c.Porch enclosure of an existingdeck no larger than two hundred (200) square feet. d.No increase in impervious surface coverage. e.No reduction in natural vegetation cover. f.Compliance with all other applicable zoning regulations. g.Construction or repair of a private residential fence, in compliance with 12-1D-6 of this title. h.Construction of an accessory structure not requiring a building permit. i.Emergency repairs to an existing structure or land that requires immediate action to mitigate any additional negative impacts. j.Removal of invasive terrestrial plants and noxious weeds, by agreement with the City and in compliance with best management practices. k.Removal of dead, dying, or diseased vegetation, by agreement with the City and in compliance with best management practices. page 125 4.The city administrator, or designee,may issue an administrative approval. Such approval may include conditions if those conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with the intent and/or specific regulations of the wetlands ordinance or other applicable regulations. If issues are found inthe application that disqualify the request from administrative approval under this section, the city administrator shall refer the application to the planning commission for review under subsection C2 of this section. (Ord. 441, 2-21-2012) Section 2. Section 12-2-10(A) is hereby amended to read as follows: A.Base Fees: To defray administrative costs for processing of wetlands permit applications, a base fee as set by resolution of the city council shall be paid by all applicants. Base fees as set by resolution of the city council shall also be required for a permit renewal and for an application approved administratively as a minor development under subsection 12-2-6 12-2-6C3 of this chapter. (1981 Code 402 § 12; amd. 2003 Code) Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this seventeenthday of March, 2015. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ___________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 126 DATE: February 24, 2015 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-37 Proposed Code Amendments – Wetlands Systems Chapter APPLICANT: City of Mendota Heights PROPERTY ADDRESS: N/A ZONING/GUIDED: N/A ACTION DEADLINE: N/A DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The City is considering amendments to Title 12, Chapter 2 of the City Code concerning wetlands systems. BACKGROUND Staff has identified potential code amendments concerning the wetlands permit administrative approval process for discussion and recommendation by the Planning Commission. The goal is to clean-up and streamline the approval process for certain activities. The applicationwas originally presented at the December 23, 2014 Commission meeting, but was tabled to allow for review and comment by the full Commission at an upcoming meeting. ANALYSIS As contained in DRAFT Ordinance 471, the following amendments are proposed; the rationale for each is provided under the applicable section: Title 12-2-6(C) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND EXEMPTIONS 1.All proposals to adjust a W district boundary line shall follow the same administrative procedures as outlined in section 12-1L-7of this title. 2.Permit application shall be processed in accordance with the procedures specified for the processing of a conditional use permit under the city zoning ordinance. The revision is necessary to clarify that an administrative approval process under this chapter is not subject to the same process as a conditional use permit. Conditional use permits require a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. The purpose of an administrative approval process is to expedite the approval of qualifying applications, in compliance with certain conditions –as in #3 below. page 127 3.Where a project is proposed within the wetlands district, the city administrator may, at his or her discretion, direct the appropriate staff member to review the permit request for administrative approval when all of the following conditions exist: a.No change from existing grades. b.No increase in building or structure square footage. c.Porch enclosure of an existing deck no larger than two hundred (200) square feet. d.No increase in impervious surface coverage. e.No reduction in natural vegetation cover. f.Compliance with all other applicable zoning regulations. g.Construction or repair of a private residential fence, in compliance with 12-1D-6 of this title. If all other conditions included in #3 are met and the fence is compliant with the applicable construction standards, staff canapprove applications for fences within a wetlands/water resource-related area administratively. A similar process that required conditional use permit approval for fences encroaching into rights-of-way was recently amended to allow for administrative approval. h.Construction of an accessory structure not requiring a building permit. The City currently does not require a building permit for an accessory structure under 200 square feet. However, the current Code requires a wetlands permit for the construction, alteration, orremoval of any structure \[12-2-6(A)(4)\]. As long as all other conditions and applicable standards are met and a building permit is not required, staff can approve applications for accessory structureswithin a wetlands/water resource-related area administratively. i.Emergency repairs to an existing structure or land that requires immediate action to mitigate any additional negative impacts. An expedited approval processshould be allowedin this case. Examples of potential projects include streambank or infrastructure repair, slope stabilization, or structure reinforcement. j.Removal of invasive terrestrial plants and noxious weeds, by agreement with the City and in compliance with best management practices. The City encourages this activity because of the potential benefit to native vegetation in wetland/water resource-related areas. The agreement requirement ensures best management practices are followed andthat the permit can be revoked if violated. k.Removal of dead, dying, or diseasedvegetation, by agreement with the City and in compliance with best management practices. The Cityalsoencourages this activity to prevent the potential spread of emerald ash borer and dead vegetation washing into water bodies. The agreement requirement ensures best management practices are followed and that the permit can be revoked if violated. 4.The city administrator, or designee,may issue an administrative approval. Such approval may include conditions if those conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with the intent and/or page 128 specific regulations of the wetlands ordinance or other applicable regulations. If issues are found in the application that disqualify the request from administrative approval under this section, the city administrator shall refer the application to the planning commission for review under subsection C2 of this section. (Ord. 441, 2-21-2012) The revision is necessary to be consistent with 12-2-6(C)(3) above, which allows the city administrator to direct the appropriate staff member to review an administrative permit application. The designee would also be allowed to approve the administrative permit, which would most likely be the Public Works Director/City Engineer or City Planner. Title 12-2-10(A): FEES Proposed Amendment Base Fees: To defray administrative costs for processing of wetlands permit applications, a base fee as set by resolution of the city council shall be paid by all applicants. Base fees as set by resolution of the city council shall also be required for a permit renewal and for an application approved administrativelyas a minor development under subsection 12-2-6 12-2-6C3of this chapter. (1981 Code 402 §12; amd. 2003 Code) Rationale The revisionis necessary to clean-up the current reference to a “minor development,” which no longer exists in the Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the proposed Code amendments. If acceptable to the Commission, action can be taken at this month’s meeting. Staff would proposeto bring back any suggested revisions for review at a future meeting prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. ACTION REQUESTED Following the public hearing and further discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1.Recommend approval of DRAFT Ordinance 471, as presented or as amended by the Commission. OR 2.Recommend denial of DRAFT Ordinance 471. OR 3.Table the request, pending additional information and revisions from staff. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1.DRAFT Ordinance 471 2.Planning application, including supporting materials page 129 page 130 page 131 page 132 9h. DATE: March 17, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Officer Scott Patrick Memorial Options Study INTRODUCTION The City Council is asked to give direction regarding ways to publically honor the memory of Mendota Heights Police Officer Scott Patrick. BACKGROUND Since the death of Officer Patrick in July, 2014, a number of alternatives have been suggested as ways to recognize his service. A committee comprised of three Mendota Heightspolice officers has been tracking the suggestions, and has been making progress on the implementation of some of them. Most notably, a fundraising event is being held at the Bloomington Ramada on April 11th, which will help to fund a trip to Washington, D.C. by members of the Patrick family, and by several Mendota Heights police officers. The purpose of the trip is to take part in a ceremony which will th add Officer Patrick’s name to the National Law Enforcement Memorial on May 15. Remaining proceeds from that fundraising event could be used for other memorial options. Dodd Road: One suggestion which has been pursued is the possible re-designation of Dodd Road, from I-494 at the southern edge of Mendota Heights, through the city to either the northeastern border with West St. Paul, or to Smith Avenue in that city. The street would remain Dodd Road for official identification and addressing purposes, but blue on white memorial signs noting it as “Officer Scott Patrick Memorial Highway” would be placed under the Dodd Road street identification signs as a tribute to the officer. A bill (HF 1461) to authorize this has been introduced by Rep. Joe Atkins, but committee consideration of the bill was requested to be placed on hold until after the City Council has had a chance to consider the larger issue. In order for that bill to be acted upon this year, HF 1461would need to receive a legislative th . committee hearing by March 20 page 133 Physical Memorial: The other major memorial issue is the creation of a physical memorial—this could include such things as a statue, memorial stone, and park –like amenities. Questions to be answered include: Location—should it be on the grounds outside of the Police Department, elsewhere at City Hall, or at a City park? How encompassing should the memorial be—Should the memorial be for Officer Patrick alone, or for all fallen public safety personnel, as the fire department has also expressed an interest in a more encompassing memorial? Mendota Heights does not have a memorial for Veterans. Should that also be incorporated into a physical memorial? City Participation—Should the City’s involvement be limited to donation of the location alone, with funding to come from private sources only, or should the City also consider some level of monetary support? Other Options: There are other memorial options which have been proposed, such as the possible renaming of the City’s Mendota Heights 5K race in June, to commemorate Officer Patrick. Those options may also need to be considered by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION So that there may be a study of, and coordination of the various alternatives to honor Officer Patrick, it is recommended that a Study Committee be formed to review the options, and make a recommendation to the City Council. As stated earlier, if the Council wants to pursue the re-dedication of Dodd Road during this legislative session, it should so indicate at the March 17th meeting. However, my recommendation is to allow the Study Committee to first review the overall proposals, and to then make a recommendation tothe City Council, even if that means a delay of the Legislature’s consideration to 2016. ACTION REQUIRED: If the Council concurs, it should, by motion: 1.Authorize the creation of an Officer Scott Patrick Memorial Alternatives Committee. 2. Indicate whether or not it wishes to have HF 1461, relating to Dodd Road, pursued in the 2015 Legislative session. ______________________ - ±ª -¢.¤¨«« #¨³¸ !£¬¨­¨²³± ³®±