Loading...
2014-07-15 Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 15, 2014 — 7:00 pm Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adopt Agenda 5. Consent Agenda a. Approval of July 1, 2014 City Council Minutes b. Acknowledgement of July 8, 2014 Parks & Rec Commission Minutes c. Acknowledgement of July 9, 2014 Airport Relations Commission Minutes d. Receipt of May 2014 Fire Department Synopsis Report e. Approval of Time Change for August 51" City Council Meeting due to Night to Unite f. Approval of Resolution 2014-42 Revising Building Permit Fee Schedule g. Approval of Resolution 2014-43 Honoring Eunice Diedrich h. Approval of Personnel Action Report i. Receipt of June Par 3 Report j. Approval of Claims List k. Approval of Contractors List I. Approve Building Activity Report June 2014 6. Public Comments 7. New and Unfinished Business a. Planning Case 2014-17, Variance Requests, 1704 Vicki Lane, Ned Rukavina and Leslie Pilgrim, Resolution 2014-39 (Continued from July 1, 2014) b. Planning Case 2014-13, Variance and Wetland Permit Requests, 677 4t" Avenue, Ken and Mary Kay Noack, Resolution 2014-38 (Continued from July 1, 2014) 8. Community Announcements 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn page 2 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 1, 2014 Sa. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Krebsbach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Councilmembers Duggan, Povolny, Petschel. Absent: Councilmember Norton. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Krebsbach presented the agenda for adoption agenda. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of the CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Krebsbach presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein, pulling items e.) Approval of Resolution 2014-40 Municipal State Aid Street Designation Revisions and k.) Approval of Claims List. a. Approval of June 17, 2014 City Council Minutes b. Acknowledgement of June 10, 2014 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes c. Acknowledgement of June 24, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes d. Receipt of May 2014 Par 3 Report e. Approval of Resolution 2014-40 Municipal State Aid Street Designation Revisions f. Approval of Personnel Action Report g. Approval of Out of State Travel for Police Officer Background Checks July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page I page 3 h. Approval of Resolution 2014-41 Authorization to Order Feasibility Report for Kensington Neighborhood Street Rehabilitation i. Approval of Emergency Purchase Order for Interstate Valley Creek Trail Culvert Repair j. Receipt of May Treasurer's Report k. Approval of Claims List 1. Approval of Contractors List Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEM E) APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2014-40 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET DESIGNATION REVISIONS Public Works Director / City Engineer John Mazzitello explained that a certain number of miles of the municipal streets are designated as municipal state aid streets. Each year the City goes through a revision process with the State Department of Transportation and designates which streets would be MSA; having a limited number of miles that can be claimed. For the past several years, these streets have stayed the same. This year the City is requesting to make a subtle change including removing Lexington Avenue and adding Victoria, from Marie to Lexington. In next year's cycle, the City would be looking to add Centre Pointe Curve to Dakota Road, and other frontage roads that have been received back from the State Department of Transportation. Mayor Krebsbach asked if the total mileage would remain the same. Engineer Mazzitello replied that the total maximum mileage that could be claimed would remain the same. Once the revisions are made this year and next year, the City would be at the maximum allowable mileage. Mayor Krebsbach also asked if this would affect the street reconstruction. Engineer Mazzitello replied that it would not affect the street reconstruction this year; and once Victoria is added next year it would not affect that project either. In addition, the City would be able to use MSA dollars on that project as planned. Councilmember Duggan moved to ADOPT RESOLUTION 2014 — 40, RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 page 4 K) APPROVAL OF CLAIMS LIST Councilmember Duggan noted that he had a question on the claim from Inver Grove Ford for a new Parks truck in the amount of $34,039.92. He asked if the City saved any money or is the purchase on budget. Engineer Mazzitello replied that they were able to obtain a fleet vehicle off the floor rather than ordering the vehicle. The budget was $36,218 and the cost of the fleet vehicle was $34,039.92. Councilmember Duggan also asked about the payment to KDV for the final audit billing in the amount of $17,350.00. Finance Director Kristen Schabacker replied for the 2013 audit the Engagement Letter was approved for approximately $32,000, and that was what was billed for the audit. The amount on the claims list is the final payment of that billing. Councilmember Duggan moved APPROVAL OF CLAIMS LIST. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A) NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITY FRANCHISE FEES City Administrator Justin Miller explained that this would be the first step in the process if Council would decide to implement a franchise fee on the City's gas and electric bills. This topic was first discussed at the City Council Workshop on May 29, 2014. At that time, Council directed staff to continue to work with Xcel Energy. Xcel requires a 90 day period before initial consideration of the franchise fee. If the Council decides to adopt the fee, there would be another 90 day period before they would start to collect the fee. As the City starts to talk about the 2015 budget, this clock would need to be started now if the City were to collect that fee early in 2015. Tonight's action would not implement the franchise agreement; it is directing staff to alert Xcel Energy that the City is considering this and would start that first 90 day period. Staff has requested that Xcel Energy provide what the different fees and fee structures would provide to the City. This would be a continued discussion with the City Council through the budget hearings throughout the fall. Staff requested Council to acknowledge the draft ordinances 463 through 466; franchise agreement and franchise fee ordinance for both gas and electric. July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 page 5 Mayor Krebsbach wished to make it clear that this would be a fee paid by anyone in the City, resident or business, with a utility account. She also explained that the reason the City is considering this is because there are a number of non -profits in the City and this would be one way to have some compensation for the use of the public rights-of-way. Administrator Miller also noted that the rate differentials differ from city to city; some cities do it as a percentage of the total bill, others do it as a flat dollar amount, others have a different rate for residential, commercial, or industrial. Mr. Jake Sedlacek of Xcel Energy was on hand to answer questions. Councilmember Duggan asked if any other entity has paid the City for use of the rights-of-way to deliver utility services. Administrator Miller replied that other than the initial installation, he was unaware of utilities paying an on-going fee. Mayor Krebsbach also noted that if the City decides to implement these fees, the monies would be dedicated; they would not be directed into the general fund. Councilmember Povolny moved to ACKNOWLEDGE THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITY FRANCHISE FEES. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Councilmember Duggan noted that he would like to see a sunset added to the ordinance. Councilmember Petschel replied that these would be contracts which always include an end date. Administrator Miller stated that Councilmember Petschel was correct and that the proposals before the Council would be 20 year agreements. Councilmember Duggan stated that he would like to see these be 10 years agreements. This option will be discussed going forward. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: B) PLANNING CASE 2014-13, VARIANCE AND WETLAND PERMIT REQUESTS, 677 4' AVENUE, KEN AND MARY KAY NOACK, RESOLUTION 2014-38 Planner Nolan Wall explained that this application came before the Planning Commission who held two public hearings, one in May 2014 and one in June 2014. As a result of the discussion and the action taken at the last Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has asked to delay this item until the July 15a' Council meeting. Councilmember Duggan moved to table PLANNING CASE 2014-13, VARIANCE AND WETLAND PERMIT REQUESTS, 677 4TH AVENUE, KEN AND MARY KAY NOACK, RESOLUTION 2014- 38. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: page 6 C) PLANNING CASE 2014-17, VARIANCE REQUESTS, 1704 VICKI LANE, NED RUKAVINA AND LESLIE PILGRIM, RESOLUTION 2014-39 Planner Nolan Wall explained that the applicant has requested variances from the front and side yard setbacks standards to construct an addition onto their single family dwelling at 1704 Vicki Lane. The subject parcel is .48 acres and contains a dwelling and an attached two car garage with cul-de-sac frontage. The property is zoned R-1 and guided for low density residential development. The applicant intends to construct an addition that would enlarge the existing garage with an additional stall, add a mudroom and small studio, and remodel the kitchen. Planner Wall shared a copy of the site plan and noted that the existing dwelling, including the attached garage, is within the required setbacks for the R-1 district. The proposed addition would encroach eleven feet at its greatest dimension into the front yard setback (204 square feet) and would encroach five feet at its greatest dimension into the side yard setback (18 square feet); together the entire proposed addition to the dwelling would encroach approximately 222 square feet into the required setback areas and would extend the existing structure as much as fifteen feet closer to the street. The subject parcel's location on a cul-de-sac causes a curvilinear front yard setback line, which according to the applicant, makes square structures difficult to fit on the lot. The original site plan showed an expanded driveway, which was located within two feet of the side yard property boundary line. The code requires a five foot setback. In discussions with the applicant and based on the issue raised by the Commission, the applicant did submit a revised site plan that shows how this driveway could be redesigned to meet that five foot setback. Planner Wall explained the standard of reviews needed to consider a variance request. Staff recommended approval of Resolution 2014-39 in denial of the set -back variance requests based on Findings of Fact. Mr. Ned Rukavina introduced his wife [Ms. Leslie Pilgrim] and his neighbors [Mr. Tom Parker and Mr. Joe Morgan] who were in attendance to show their support. He also shared signatures from the neighbors adjoining his property indicating their support of the project, with the exception of one neighbor. Mr. Rukavina reviewed his plans and the effect on the adjoining the properties and the rights- of-way. Councilmembers asked questions of Mr. Rukavina about the exploration of alternatives. Councilmember Duggan noted that he would be supportive of Mr. Rukavina's plans simply because of the size and configuration of his lot, the difficulties in trying to maneuver with the space that is left, the loss of trees; the open space that would remain if these plans were approved; and the support of his neighbors. July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 page 7 Councilmember Povolny stated that he believes there are other ways of doing this project without encroaching into the front yard setback. He believes this is too large of an encroachment and it would change the neighborhood. Mayor Krebsbach requested a confirmation on the numbers under consideration. Planner Wall replied that current building plan would encroach into the front yard setback 11 feet at its greatest dimension, totaling 204 square feet. Councilmember Petschel commented that she does not have an issue with the side yard variance; however, she shared Councilmember Povolny's concerns about the front yard encroachments. Mayor Krebsbach suggested that the applicant take another look at the floor plan and see what could be done. After discussions, Councilmember Duggan moved to table RESOLUTION 2014-39 RESOLUTION DENYING FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES to the July 15, 2015 City Council meeting. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: 1 COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS Assistant to the City Administrator Tamara Schutta made the following announcements: • There are no concerts this week because of the holiday. The next concert will be Wednesday, July 9, 2014 at the Market Square with the "Cash and Kerry Show." • Mendakota Country Club sponsoring fireworks on July 4th at dusk. • No Park & Rec activities this week. The next field trip is Thursday, July 10 to Bunker Beach. • Tuesday, August 5th is "Night to Unite". For more information, call the Police Department. • The State Primary Election will be held Tuesday, August 12. Residents who will not available to vote at their polling place can absentee vote at this time. • Voters can register online by July 22 for the State Primary Election by going to the City's website. • Mendota Day is Saturday, July 12 with a parade, kids' events, and music. • The Mendota Heights For a Lifetime group is meeting on Wednesday, July 23, 2014 to "Plan for Your Later Years" at City Hall. The public is invited. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Duggan asked about the City Hall roof leak and was informed that staff is working with the contractor to have it repaired. July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 page 8 He also asked when Victoria reconstruction might start and was informed that ground breaking should start on July 23 with construction being completed in September 2014. To his question regarding the condition of the bluffs with all of the rain that has taken place. Administrator Miller replied that there are areas that are unstable. The engineers and police & fire have been going out to those areas completing inspections. All are encouraged to be very cautious and refrain from removing vegetation. In terms of the rule making process, the Planning Commission had their first review at their last meeting and will do that again in July. Staff anticipates bringing draft comments to the Council in August for review and then submitting those comments to the State as part of their rule making process. Councilmember Petschel reminded the residents that on Tuesday, July 29 at 7:00 p.m., the Metropolitan Airport Commission will be in the Council Chambers to listen to residents' issues in regard to airplane activity over the City. She also gave thanks to Officer Mike Shepard for helping the neighborhood on Bent Tree and Quail Ridge remove an enormous snapping turtle. It took six residents with shovels to get it back in a trailer to take it down to the pond. She gave special recognition to Eunice Diedrich who will be celebrating her 1001' birthday on July 2. Mayor Krebsbach reminded everyone of the fireworks display on July 4th Fire Chief John Maczko was in attendance and wearing a `police' shirt [under protest] as settlement on the "Guns & Hoses Wing Eating Contest", which the Police won. Chief Maczko also expressed his wish for everyone to have a happy and safe 4th of July, stay away from the bluffs, and be careful as fireworks are a dangerous explosive. Chief Maczko listed what fireworks are legal and which ones are not. From a fireworks perspective, anything that leaves it container and shoots in the air is illegal in the State of Minnesota unless they are a licensed pyrotechnics technician. Councilmember Duggan noted that St. Thomas Academy has a new headmaster, Matt Mohs. He also gave recognition to the American Soccer Team for an outstanding showing in the tournament. He and his wife celebrated their anniversary by attending the Eagan Art event. Mayor Krebsbach stated that her daughter was married on June 28th at Crested Butte, CO and everyone had a great time at this mountain wedding. ADJOURN Councilmember Duggan moved to adjourn. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Absent: Mayor Krebsbach adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m. Sandra Krebsbach Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith City Clerk page 9 July 1, 2014 Mendota Heights City Council Page 8 page 10 Sb. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION MEETING July 08, 2014 The July meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, July 08, 2014 at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chair Paper called to order the parks and recreation commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. The following commissioners were present: Chair Paper, Commissioners Jack Evans, Ira Kipp, David Miller, Stephanie Levine and Michael Toth. Staff present: Recreation Program Coordinator Sloan Wallgren and City Planner Nolan Wall. Approval of Agenda COMMISSIONER LEVINE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA; COMMISSIONER MILLER SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES 4: NAYS 0 Approval of Minutes of June 10, 2014 COMMISSIONER EVANS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES; COMMISSIONER TOTH SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES 4: NAYS 0 Cliff Timm Fishing Derby Mr. Wallgren announced that the annual Cliff Timm Fishing Derby was held on June 18, 2014 at Rogers Lake Park. There were over 30 kids that participated in the event. Each participant received a tackle box filled with a variety of fishing related items. Each year the city awards one lucky participant a Minnesota Lifetime Fishing License. This year the winner was Brooke Townsend. Brooke and her family were in attendance to accept her award. Chair Paper thanked staff for conducting a wonderful event. Eagle Scout Project On June 21, 2104 Anthony Dupont cleaned out the flower beds at the Par 3 and put down 140 bags of mulch as part of his Eagle Scout Project. Anthony presented his project to the commission and showed before and after pictures of the flower beds. The entire commission thanked Anthony for his service to the city and congratulated him on achieving his Eagle Scout status. MH Parks and Recreation Commission 7-08-2014 Page 1 page 11 Recycling in the Parks Jackson Becker, an intern with Dakota County, informed the commission that he went out and inventoried 4 parks in Mendota Heights to determine if there was adequate recycling opportunities. Jackson said that the city could improve its number of recycling bins in the park to help reduce the amount of trash that was being produced. Commissioner Kipp asked if recycling was cheaper to dump then garbage. Jackson said that it was cheaper to recycle but did not know the exact dollar amount. Commissioner Levine thought that this was a great discussion topic and that we should do everything we can to help educate people about the benefits of recycling. She would like to see more recycling containers in the parks. Staff will continue to inventory the rest of the parks in town and will come up with a plan to have better labeled containers and more recycling containers. Park Maintenance Mr. Wallgren informed the commission that John Boland was promoted to the Lead Park Maintenance position on July 1, 2014. He wanted to congratulate John and also said that staff is in the process of filling Johns vacated position. Recreation Programming Report Mr. Wallgren informed the commission that the summer recreation programs were half way over. He stated that they received many complements about the Playground Program, Skateboard Camps and staff. The adult softball leagues will be wrapping up the week of July 14, 2014. There were several weeks when the games were rained out, but we have been able to make up most of the games. Mr. Wallgren also informed the commission that there were many activities taking place at the Thompson Park Activity Center, and encouraged anyone that wanted more information to contact city hall. Par 3 Report Mr. Wallgren informed the commission that the golf course was closed for 2 �/z days during the month of June. He pointed out that there has been an increase in the Recreation Programs revenue at the golf course. Looking forward to the month of July, the course is hosting 2 golf outings as well as a Jr. PGA golf event on July 31, 2014 with 60 participants. The golf course will also be running specials with Groupon and Living Social in late July or early August. Total sales for the month of May were $23,799 and total expenses were $20,267. Total sales year to date are $65,484 and expenses are $61,966 resulting in a net profit of $3,518. Mr. Wallgren said that these numbers include materials and parts for the remodel of the clubhouse. These numbers will be adjusted once we receive payment form the insurance company. MH Parks and Recreation Commission 7-08-2014 Page 2 page 12 Announcements Mr. Wallgren announced there was still space available for the youth field trips on July 10, 2014 to the Bunker Beach Wave Pool and on July 24, 2014 to the Edina Water Park. He also stated that the Puppet Wagon will continue to perform on Mondays from 11:45a.m. to 12:45p.m. at Market Square Park. Park Maintenance Commissioner Paper congratulated Terry Blum on being promoted to Public Works Superintendent. Commissioner Paper also wanted to make sure that the Parks Staff got extra help if they needed it. Mr. Wallgren informed that commission that it would be a while before the Parks Staff was back to 3 full time employees, but he believed that they were going to hire a couple of extra part time seasonal employees to make it through the summer. Commission Comments Commissioner Toth asked how the city faired with all of the raining the month of June. He also thanked Anthony and Jackson for their service to the city. Commissioner Levine thanked people for the work that was done at Valley Park and also thanks Anthony and Jackson for their work. Commissioner Miller encouraged everyone to check out the Splash Pool in South St. Paul and stated that he would really like to see our city build a splash pad. Commissioner Evans thanked Anthony and Jackson for their work and for coming to the meeting. Commissioner Kipp thanked Anthony and Jackson for their help, and he thought it was a good meeting. Commissioner Paper thanked Anthony and Jackson for coming to the meeting. He also congratulated Brooke on her fishing award and congratulated John Boland on his new position. COMMISSIONER MILLER MADE A MOTION TO ADJOUN THE MEETING; COMMISSIONER TOTH SECONDED THE MOTION. Ayes 6: Nays 0 The meeting adj oumed at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by Sloan Wallgren MH Parks and Recreation Commission 7-08-2014 Page 3 page 13 MH Parks and Recreation Commission 7-08-2014 Page 4 page 14 Sc. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES July 9, 2014 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, July 9, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. at the FAA Tower at MSP International Airport. The following commissioners were present: David Sloan, William Dunn, Gina Norling, Jim Neuharth, Paul Portz, and Kevin Byrnes Absent: Sally Lorberbaum (excused) Also present: City Administrator Justin Miller FAA Tower Tour Commissioners toured the FAA Air Traffic Control Tower. No other business was conducted. Adiourn The tour ended at approximately 8:00 pm. R m DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Fire Calls Sparge 15 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Height , M 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax wn,mendota-heights.com Sd. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS July 15, 2014 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator Dave Dreelan, Assistant Fire Chief May 2014 Fire Synopsis The department responded to 22 calls for the month of May. The majority of calls were classified as false alarms or as good intent calls. Six calls were residential in nature, two calls were commercial alarms, one call was for a grass fire, two calls were for medical assistance, one call was for a leak (natural gas smell) and one was a smoke scare call (an area was covered in wood mulch and firefighters wet the area as a precaution). Monthly Department Training The monthly drill consisted of drafting and relay pumping. The primary goal of relay pumping is to practice the operation requirements for the department to supply a large amount of water (1,000 gallons per minute) to an attack pumper which is a substantial distance from a fire hydrant. This is done by placing one pumper at the hydrant, laying 600' of supply line to a second pumper and then an additional 600' of supply line from the second pumper to the attack pumper. All three trucks pump in tandem to relay pump to each other. Firefighters are able to obtain an uninterrupted flow of over 1,000 gallons per minute once the system is functional. The primary goal of drafting is for each firefighter to flow water from the tank to a hand line and then be able to make the transition of drafting from the 2,000 gallon drop tank without losing pressure. MonthlySguad Training The monthly squad drill for the month was focused on single engine operations. Firefighters were expected to identify a specific hydrant, hook up to the fire hydrant with one 100' of 4" hose, and do a forward lay of fire hose as per our Standard Operating Guidelines. When the apparatus stops at the hydrant, the firefighters pull a pre -connect line and then flow water at 125 gallons per minute. The engineer and hydrant person must be able to get water to the truck before the tank runs out (which has 500 gallons of water). Once the switch from tank to hydrant water is completed, the drill is over. The hose is then reloaded and firefighters are rotated through to become familiar with operations of pumping and connecting to fire hydrants. MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT MAY 2014 MONTHLY REPORT FIRE CALLS NO. 14096 - 14117 NUMBER OF CALLS FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER I STRUCTURE CONTENTS ACTUAL FIRES $0 Structure - MH Commercial $0 Structure - MH Residential $0 Structure - Contract Areas INSPECTIONS Vehicle - MH INVESTIGATIONS Vehicle - Contract Areas RE -INSPECTION Grass/Brush/No Value MH 1 Grass/Brush/No Value Contract 3 MEDICAL 17 Assist 2 Extrication 62 HAZARDOUS SITUATION Spills/Leaks 1 Arcing/Shorting Chemical Power Line Down FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction 1 Commercial Malfunction 1 Unintentional - Commercial 1 Unintentional - Residential 5 Criminal GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare 1 Steam Mistaken for Smoke Other 9 MUTUAL AID TOTAL CALLS 22 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE MENDOTA HEIGHTS 18 101 MENDOTA 1 3 SUNFISH LAKE 1 4 LILYDALE 2 6 OTHER 0 3 TOTAL 22 117 WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE FIRE CALLS 263 2131.5 MEETINGS 27.5 169.5 DRILLS 147.5 764.5 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 34 180.5 SPECIAL ACTIVITY 323 1870.25 ADMINISTATIVE 0 0 FIRE MARSHAL 62 249 TOTALS 857 5365.25 page 16 22 MISC. TOTALS TO DATE $0 $49,000 $36,500 TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $0 $0 MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS $525,000 MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS $36,500 MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE $561,500 BILLING FOR SERVICES LAST YEAR 66 2 3 7 5 83 LAST YEAR 1442 184 751 188 991 0 299 3855 MN/DOT $0 MILW. RR $0 CNR RR $0 OTHERS: INSPECTIONS REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS $0 TOTALS: $0 $0 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH INSPECTIONS 42 INVESTIGATIONS 0 RE -INSPECTION 0 MEETINGS 3 ADMINISTRATION 17 SPECIAL PROJECTS 0 TOTAL 62 REMARKS: SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS page 17 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN Se. 651.452.1850 phone 1651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com R CITY OF MENDIDTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Justin Miller, City Administrator SUBJECT: Change of Time for August 5 1 City Council Meeting BACKGROUND The year's Night to Unite is scheduled for Tuesday, August 5th, which is the same night as a city council meeting. In years past, the city council has chosen to start their meeting on this night an hour later so that councilmembers and staff can attend block parties being held by various neighborhoods. If this is the desire of the council again, the official start time of the August 5 t city council meeting would be publicized as 8:00 pm. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION If council desires, a motion to approve changing the time of the August 5a' city council meeting to 8:00 pm would be in order. Approval of this action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 18 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 5 5f. 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com MjCITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP, MBA Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution 2014-42 — Approving a Revised Fee Schedule for Building Permit Fees BACKGROUND Since the appointment of a new Building Official earlier in 2014, City staff has been evaluating the Building Permit fee structure. The existing fee schedule has been in place since 1997 and is based on the old International Building Code (IBC) fee schedule of the same time frame. Since that time, costs for services have gone up, and little guidance has been provided through the IBC. The State of Minnesota has published guidance that the attached Revised Fee Schedule is based upon. Although none of the fee schedule changes is significant, the following outlines a summary of the changes to the schedule: - Breaks out specific Building Permit types for separate and specific fees (roofing, windows, gas fireplaces) - Minimum permit fee for mechanical and plumbing permits raised from $50 to $75 - Fence Permit fee raised from $25 to $50 - Plan Review fee raised from 55% to State recommended 65% (per Attachment A) - Public Right -of -Way fee (residential) raised from $25 to $50 Most other area municipalities have fee structures similar to the proposed schedule. The attached proposed Revised Fee Schedule will provide a greater level of consistency to applicants, as well as an added level of simplicity for City staff. BUDGET IMPACT Revenue derived from Building Permit fees are deposited into the General Fund and are primarily utilized to offset the costs of providing the Building Official services to the City. The revised fees, as proposed, would provide a modest increase to revenues to go along with the increased inspection services offered by the Building Official. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution 2014-42, RESOLUTION REVISING SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICES. This action requires a simple majority vote. page 19 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014 - 42 RESOLUTION REVISING SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights adopted Resolution 2014-01 "Revising Schedule of Fees for Services" on January 7, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has established by City Code that all fee requirements established be brought forth by resolution; and WHEREAS, the last revision to the City's Building Permit Fees took place in 1997; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that fees be revised to cover costs of providing services and to cover new services. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council, that the attached revised City of Mendota Heights fee schedule for Building Permit Fees is hereby adopted and approved. Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 15th day of July 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST Lorri Smith, City Clerk Attachment A page 20 to Resolution 2014-42 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $1.00 to $500.00 $23.50 $15.28 $501.00 to $600.00 $26.55 $17.26 $601.00 to $700.00 $29.60 $19.24 $701.00 to $800.00 $32.65 $21.22 $801.00 to $900.00 $35.70 $23.21 $901.00 to $1,000.00 $38.75 $25.19 $1,001.00 to $1,100.00 $41.80 $27.17 $1,101.00 to $1,200.00 $44.85 $29.15 $1,201.00 to $1,300.00 $47.90 $31.14 $1,301.00 to $1,400.00 $50.95 $33.12 $1,401.00 to $1,500.00 $54.00 $35.10 $1,501.00 to $1,600.00 $57.05 $37.08 $1,601.00 to $1,700.00 $60.10 $39.07 $1,701.00 to $1,800.00 $63.15 $41.05 $1,801.00 to $1,900.00 $66.20 $43.03 $1,901.00 to $2,000.00 $69.25 $45.01 $2,001.00 to $3,000.00 $83.25 $54.11 $3,001.00 to $4,000.00 $97.25 $63.21 $4,001.00 to $5,000.00 $111.25 $72.31 $5,001.00 to $6,000.00 $125.25 $81.41 $6,001.00 to $7,000.00 $139.25 $90.51 $7,001.00 to $8,000.00 $153.25 $99.61 $8,001.00 to $9,000.00 $167.25 $108.71 $9,001.00 to $10,000.00 $181.25 $117.81 $10,001.00 to $11,000.00 $195.25 $126.91 $11,001.00 to $12,000.00 $209.25 $136.01 $12,001.00 to $13,000.00 $223.25 $145.11 $13,001.00 to $14,000.00 $237.25 $154.21 $14,001.00 to $15,000.00 $251.25 $163.31 $15,001.00 to $16,000.00 $265.25 $172.41 $16,001.00 to $17,000.00 $279.25 $181.51 $17,001.00 to $18,000.00 $293.25 $190.61 $18,001.00 to $19,000.00 $307.25 $199.71 $19,001.00 to $20,000.00 $321.25 $208.81 $20,001.00 to $21,000.00 $335.25 $217.91 $21,001.00 to $22,000.00 $349.25 $227.01 $22,001.00 to $23,000.00 $363.25 $236.11 $23,001.00 to $24,000.00 $377.25 $245.21 $24,001.00 to $25,000.00 $391.25 $254.31 $25,001.00 to $26,000.00 $401.35 $260.88 $26,001.00 to $27,000.00 $411.45 $267.44 $27,001.00 to $28,000.00 $421.55 $274.01 $28,001.00 to $29,000.00 $431.65 $280.57 $29,001.00 to $30,000.00 $441.75 $287.14 $30,001.00 to $31,000.00 $451.85 $293.70 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $31,001.00 to $32,000.00 $461.95 $300.27 $32,001.00 to $33,000.00 $472.05 $306.83 $33,001.00 to $34,000.00 $482.15 $313.40 $34,001.00 to $35,000.00 $492.25 $319.96 $35,001.00 to $36,000.00 $502.35 $326.53 $36,001.00 to $37,000.00 $512.45 $333.09 $37,001.00 to $38,000.00 $522.55 $339.66 $38,001.00 to $39,000.00 $532.65 $346.22 $39,001.00 to $40,000.00 $542.75 $352.79 $40,001.00 to $41,000.00 $552.85 $359.35 $41,001.00 to $42,000.00 $562.95 $365.92 $42 001.00 to $43,000.00 $573.05 $372.48 $43,001.00 to $44,000.00 $583.15 $379.05 $44,001.00 to $45,000.00 $593.25 $385.61 $45,001.00 to $46,000.00 $603.35 $392.18 $46,001.00 to $47,000.00 $613.45 $398.74 $47,001.00 to $48,000.00 $623.55 $405.31 $48,001.00 to $49,000.00 $633.65 $411.87 $49,001.00 to $50,000.00 $643.75 $418.44 $50,001.00 to $51,000.00 $650.75 $422.99 $51,001.00 to $52,000.00 $657.75 $427.54 $52,001.00 to $53,000.00 $664.75 $432.09 $53,001.00 to $54,000.00 $671.75 $436.64 $54,001.00 to $55,000.00 $678.75 $441.19 $55,001.00 to $56,000.00 $685.75 $445.74 $56,001.00 to $57,000.00 $692.75 $450.29 $57,001.00 to $58,000.00 $699.75 $454.84 $58,001.00 to $59,000.00 $706.75 $459.39 $59,001.00 to $60,000.00 $713.75 $463.94 $60,001.00 to $61,000.00 $720.75 $468.49 $61,001.00 to $62,000.00 $727.75 $473.04 $62,001.00 to $63,000.00 $734.75 $477.59 $63,001.00 to $64,000.00 $741.75 $482.14 $64,001.00 to $65,000.00 $748.75 $486.69 $65,001.00 to $66,000.00 $755.75 $491.24 $66,001.00 to $67,000.00 $762.75 $495.79 $67,001.00 to $68,000.00 $769.75 $500.34 $68,001.00 to $69,000.00 $776.75 $504.89 $69,001.00 to $70,000.00 $783.75 $509.44 $70,001.00 to $71,000.00 $790.75 $513.99 $71,001.00 to $72,000.00 $797.75 $518.54 $72,001.00 to $73,000.00 $804.75 $523.09 $73,001.00 to $74,000.00 $811.75 $527.64 $74,001.00 to $75,000.00 $818.75 $532.19 $75,001.00 to $76,000.00 $825.75 $536.74 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $76,001.00 to $77,000.00 $832.75 $541.29 $77,001.00 to $78,000.00 $839.75 $545.84 $78,001.00 to $79,000.00 $846.75 $550.39 $79,001.00 to $80,000.00 $853.75 $554.94 $80,001.00 to $81,000.00 $860.75 $559.49 $81,001.00 to $82,000.00 $867.75 $564.04 $82,001.00 to $83,000.00 $874.75 $568.59 $83,001.00 to $84,000.00 $881.75 $573.14 $84,001.00 to $85,000.00 $888.75 $577.69 $85,001.00 to $86,000.00 $895.75 $582.24 $86,001.00 to $87,000.00 $902.75 $586.79 $87,001.00 to $88,000.00 $909.75 $591.34 $88,001.00 to $89,000.00 $916.75 $595.89 $89,001.00 to $90,000.00 $923.75 $600.44 $90,001.00 to $91,000.00 $930.75 $604.99 $91,001.00 to $92,000.00 $937.75 $609.54 $92,001.00 to $93,000.00 $944.75 $614.09 $93,001.00 to $94,000.00 $951.75 $618.64 $94,001.00 to $95,000.00 $958.75 $623.19 $95,001.00 to $96,000.00 $965.75 $627.74 $96,001.00 to $97,000.00 $972.75 $632.29 $97,001.00 to $98,000.00 $979.75 $636.84 $98,001.00 to $99,000.00 $986.75 $641.39 $99,001.00 to $100,000.00 $993.75 $645.94 $100,001.00 to $101,000.00 $999.35 $649.58 $101,001.00 to $102,000.00 $1,004.95 $653.22 $102,001.00 to $103,000.00 $1,010.55 $656.86 $103,001.00 to $104,001.00 to $105,001.00 to $106,001.00 to $107,001.00 to $108,001.00 to $109,001.00 to $110,001.00 to $111,001.00 to $112,001.00 to $113,001.00 to $114,001.00 to $115,001.00 to $116,001.00 to $117,001.00 to $118,001.00 to $119,001.00 to $120,001.00 to $104,000.00 $105,000.00 $106,000.00 $107,000.00 $108,000.00 $109,000.00 $110,000.00 $111,000.00 $112,000.00 $113,000.00 $114,000.00 $115,000.00 $116,000.00 $117,000.00 $118,000.00 $119,000.00 $120,000.00 $121,000.00 $1,016.15 $1,021.75 $1,027.35 $1,032.95 $1,038.55 $1,044.15 $1,049.75 $1,055.35 $1,060.95 $1,066.55 $1,072.15 $1,077.75 $1,083.35 $1,088.95 $1,094.55 $1,100.15 $1,105.75 $1,111.35 $660.50 $664.14 $667.78 $671.42 $675.06 $678.70 $682.34 $685.98 $689.62 $693.26 $696.90 $700.54 $704.18 $707.82 $711.46 $715.10 $718.74 $722.38 page 21 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $121,001.00 to $122,000.00 $1,116.95 $726.02 $122,001.00 to $123,000.00 $1,122.55 $729.66 $123,001.00 to $124,000.00 $1,128.15 $733.30 $124,001.00 to $125,000.00 $1,133.75 $736.94 $125,001.00 to $126,000.00 $1,139.35 $740.58 $126,001.00 to $127,000.00 $1,144.95 $744.22 $127,001.00 to $128,000.00 $1,150.55 $747.86 $128,001.00 to $129,000.00 $1,156.15 $751.50 $129,001.00 to $130,000.00 $1,161.75 $755.14 $130,001.00 to $131,000.00 $1,167.35 $758.78 $131,001.00 to $132,000.00 $1,172.95 $762.42 $132,001.00 to $133,000.00 $1,178.55 $766.06 $133,001.00 to $134,000.00 $1,184.15 $769.70 $134,001.00 to $135,000.00 $1,189.75 $773.34 $135,001.00 to $136,000.00 $1,195.35 $776.98 $136,001.00 to $137,000.00 $1,200.95 $780.62 $137,001.00 to $138,000.00 $1,206.55 $784.26 $138,001.00 to $139,000.00 $1,212.15 $787.90 $139,001.00 to $140,000.00 $1,217.75 $791.54 $140,001.00 to $141,000.00 $1,223.35 $795.18 $141,001.00 to $142,000.00 $1,228.95 $798.82 $142,001.00 to $143,000.00 $1,234.55 $802.46 $143,001.00 to $144,000.00 $1,240.15 $806.10 $144,001.00 to $145,000.00 $1,245.75 $809.74 $145,001.00 to $146,000.00 $1,251.35 $813.38 $146,001.00 to $147,000.00 $1,256.95 $817.02 $147,001.00 to $148,000.00 $1,262.55 $820.66 $148,001.00 to $149,000.00 $1,268.15 $824.30 $149,001.00 to $150,000.00 $1,273.75 $827.94 $150,001.00 to $151,000.00 $1,279.35 $831.58 $151,001.00 to $152,000.00 $1,284.95 $835.22 $152,001.00 to $153,000.00 $1,290.55 $838.86 $153,001.00 to $154,000.00 $1,296.15 $842.50 $154,001.00 to $155,000.00 $1,301.75 $846.14 $155,001.00 to $156,000.00 $1,307.35 $849.78 $156,001.00 to $157,000.00 $1,312.95 $853.42 $157,001.00 to $158,000.00 $1,318.55 $857.06 $158,001.00 to $159,000.00 $1,324.15 $860.70 $159,001.00 to $160,000.00 $1,329.75 $864.34 $160,001.00 to $161,000.00 $1,335.35 $867.98 $161,001.00 to $162,000.00 $1,340.95 $871.62 $162,001.00 to $163,000.00 $1,346.55 $875.26 $163,001.00 to $164,000.00 $1,352.15 $878.90 $164,001.00 to $165,000.00 $1,357.75 $882.54 $165,001.00 to $166,000.00 $1,363.35 $886.18 Attachment A - pg 2 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Plan $211,001.00 to $212,000.00 Fees Review $166,001.00 to $167,000.00 $1,368.95 $889.82 $167,001.00 to $168,000.00 $1,374.55 $893.46 $168,001.00 to $169,000.00 $1,380.15 $897.10 $169,001.00 to $170,000.00 $1,385.75 $900.74 $170,001.00 to $171,000.00 $1,391.35 $904.38 $171,001.00 to $172,000.00 $1,396.95 $908.02 $172,001.00 to $173,000.00 $1,402.55 $911.66 $173,001.00 to $174,000.00 $1,408.15 $915.30 $174,001.00 to $175,000.00 $1,413.75 $918.94 $175,001.00 to $176,000.00 $1,419.35 $922.58 $176,001.00 to $177,000.00 $1,424.95 $926.22 $177,000.00 to $178,000.00 $1,430.55 $929.86 $178,001.00 to $179,000.00 $1,436.15 $933.50 $179,001.00 to $180,000.00 $1,441.75 $937.14 $180,001.00 to $181,000.00 $1,447.35 $940.78 $181,001.00 to $182,000.00 $1,452.95 $944.42 $182,001.00 to $183,000.00 $1,458.55 $948.06 $183,001.00 to $184,000.00 $1,464.15 $951.70 $184,001.00 to $185,000.00 $1,469.75 $955.34 $185,001.00 to $186,000.00 $1,475.35 $958.98 $186,001.00 to $187,000.00 $1,480.95 $962.62 $187,001.00 to $188,000.00 $1,486.55 $966.26 $188,001.00 to $189,000.00 $1,492.15 $969.90 $189,001.00 to $190,000.00 $1,497.75 $973.54 $190,001.00 to $191,000.00 $1,503.35 $977.18 $191,001.00 to $192,000.00 $1,508.95 $980.82 $192,001.00 to $193,000.00 $1,514.55 $984.46 $193,001.00 to $194,000.00 $1,520.15 $988.10 $194,001.00 to $195,000.00 $1,525.75 $991.74 $195,001.00 to $196,000.00 $1,531.35 $995.38 $196,001.00 to $197,000.00 $1,536.95 $999.02 $197,001.00 to $198,000.00 $1,542.55 $1002.66 $198,001.00 to $199,000.00 $1,548.15 $1006.30 $199,001.00 to $200,000.00 $1,553.75 $1009.94 $200,001.00 to $201,000.00 $1,559.35 $1013.58 $201,001.00 to $202,000.00 $1,564.95 $1017.22 $202,001.00 to $203,000.00 $1,570.55 $1020.86 $203,001.00 to $204,000.00 $1,576.15 $1024.50 $204,001.00 to $205,000.00 $1,581.75 $1028.14 $205,001.00 to $206,000.00 $1,587.35 $1031.78 $206,001.00 to $207,000.00 $1,592.95 $1035.42 $207,001.00 to $208,000.00 $1,598.55 $1039.06 $208,001.00 to $209,000.00 $1,604.15 $1042.70 $209,001.00 to $210,000.00 $1,609.75 $1046.34 $210,001.00 to $211,000.00 $1,615.35 $1049.98 page 22 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $211,001.00 to $212,000.00 $1,620.95 $1053.62 $212,001.00 to $213,000.00 $1,626.55 $1057.26 $213,001.00 to $214,000.00 $1,632.15 $1060.90 $214,001.00 to $215,000.00 $1,637.75 $1064.54 $215,001.00 to $216,000.00 $1,643.35 $1068.18 $216,001.00 to $217,000.00 $1,648.95 $1071.82 $217,001.00 to $218,000.00 $1,654.55 $1075.46 $218,001.00 to $219,000.00 $1,660.15 $1079.10 $219,001.00 to $220,000.00 $1,665.75 $1082.74 $220,001.00 to $221,000.00 $1,671.35 $1086.38 $221,001.00 to $222,000.00 $1,676.95 $1090.02 $222,001.00 to $223,000.00 $1,682.55 $1093.66 $223,001.00 to $224,000.00 $1,688.15 $1097.30 $224,001.00 to $225,000.00 $1,693.75 $1100.94 $225,001.00 to $226,000.00 $1,699.35 $1104.58 $226,001.00 to $227,000.00 $1,704.95 $1108.22 $227,001.00 to $228,000.00 $1,710.55 $1111.86 $228,001.00 to $229,000.00 $1,716.15 $1115.50 $229,001.00 to $230,000.00 $1,721.75 $1119.14 $230,901.00 to $231,000.00 $1,727.35 $1122.78 $231,001.00 to $232,000.00 $1,732.95 $1126.42 $232,001.00 to $233,000.00 $1,738.55 $1130.06 $233,001.00 to $234,000.00 $1,744.15 $1133.70 $234,001.00 to $235,000.00 $1,749.75 $1137.34 $235,001.00 to $236,000.00 $1,755.35 $1140.98 $236,001.00 to $237,000.00 $1,760.95 $1144.62 $237,001.00 to $238,000.00 $1,766.55 $1148.26 $238,001.00 to $239,000.00 $1,772.15 $1151.90 $239,001.00 to $240,000.00 $1,777.75 $1155.54 $240,001.00 to $241,000.00 $1,783.35 $1159.18 $241,001.00 to $242,000.00 $1,788.95 $1162.82 $242,001.00 to $243,000.00 $1,794.55 $1166.46 $243,001.00 to $244,000.00 $1,800.15 $1170.10 $244,001.00 to $245,000.00 $1,805.75 $1173.74 $245,001.00 to $246,000.00 $1,811.35 $1177.38 $246,001.00 to $247,000.00 $1,816.95 $1181.02 $247,001.00 to $248,000.00 $1,822.55 $1184.66 $248,001.00 to $249,000.00 $1,828.15 $1188.30 $249,001.00 to $250,000.00 $1,833.75 $1191.94 $250,001.00 to $251,000.00 $1,839.35 $1195.58 $251,001.00 to $252,000.00 $1,844.95 $1199.22 $252,001.00 to $253,000.00 $1,850.55 $1202.86 $253,001.00 to $254,000.00 $1,856.15 $1206.50 $254,001.00 to $255,000.00 $1,861.75 $1210.14 $255,001.00 to $256,000.00 $1,867.35 $1213.78 Attachment A - pg 3 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $256,001.00 to $257,000.00 $1,872.95 $1217.42 $257,001.00 to $258,000.00 $1,878.55 $1221.06 $258,001.00 to $259,000.00 $1,884.15 $1224.70 $259,001.00 to $260,000.00 $1,889.75 $1228.34 $260,001.00 to $260,000.00 $1,895.35 $1231.98 $261,001.00 to $262,000.00 $1,900.95 $1235.62 $262,001.00 to $263,000.00 $1,906.55 $1239.26 $263,001.00 to $264,000.00 $1,912.15 $1242.90 $264,001.00 to $265,000.00 $1,917.75 $1246.54 $265,001.00 to $266,000.00 $1,923.35 $1250.18 $266,001.00 to $267,000.00 $1,928.95 $1253.82 $267,001.00 to $268,000.00 $1,934.55 $1257.46 $268,001.00 to $269,000.00 $1,940.15 $1261.10 $269,001.00 to $270,000.00 $1,945.75 $1264.74 $170,001.00 to $271,000.00 $1,951.35 $1268.38 $271,001.00 to $272,000.00 $1,956.95 $1272.02 $272,001.00 to $273,000.00 $1,962.55 $1275.66 $273,001.00 to $274,000.00 $1,968.15 $1279.30 $274,001.00 to $275,000.00 $1,973.75 $1282.94 $275,001.00 to $276,000.00 $1,979.35 $1286.58 $276,001.00 to $277,000.00 $1,984.95 $1290.22 $277,001.00 to $278,000.00 $1,990.55 $1293.86 $278,001.00 to $279,000.00 $1,996.15 $1297.50 $279,001.00 to $280,000.00 $2,001.75 $1301.14 $280,001.00 to $281,000.00 $2,007.35 $1304.78 $281,001.00 to $282,000.00 $2,012.95 $1308.42 $282,001.00 to $283,000.00 $2,018.55 $1312.06 $283,001.00 to $284,000.00 $2,024.15 $1315.70 $284,001.00 to $285,000.00 $2,029.75 $1319.34 $285,001.00 to $286,000.00 $2,035.35 $1322.98 $286,001.00 to $287,000.00 $2,040.95 $1326.62 $287,001.00 to $288,000.00 $2,046.55 $1330.26 $288,001.00 to $289,000.00 $2,052.15 $1333.90 $289,001.00 to $290,000.00 $2,057.75 $1337.54 $290,001.00 to $291,000.00 $2,063.35 $1341.18 $291,001.00 to $292,000.00 $2,068.95 $1344.82 $292,001.00 to $293,000.00 $2,074.55 $1348.46 $293,001.00 to $294,000.00 $2,080.15 $1352.10 $294,001.00 to $295,000.00 $2,085.75 $1355.74 $295,001.00 to $296,000.00 $2,091.35 $1359.38 $296,001.00 to $297,000.00 $2,096.95 $1363.02 $297,001.00 to $298,000.00 $2,102.55 $1366.66 $298,001.00 to $299,000.00 $2,108.15 $1370.30 $299,001.00 to $300,000.00 $2,113.75 $1373.94 $300,001.00 to $301,000.00 $2,119.35 $1377.58 page 23 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $301,001.00 to $302,000.00 $2,124.95 $1381.22 $302,001.00 to $303,000.00 $2,130.55 $1384.86 $303,001.00 to $304,000.00 $2,136.15 $1388.50 $304,001.00 to $305,000.00 $2,141.75 $1392.14 $305,001.00 to $306,000.00 $2,147.35 $1395.78 $306,001.00 to $307,000.00 $2,152.95 $1399.42 $307,001.00 to $308,000.00 $2,158.55 $1403.06 $308,001.00 to $309,000.00 $2,164.15 $1406.70 $309,001.00 to $310,000.00 $2,169.75 $1410.34 $310,001.00 to $311,000.00 $2,175.35 $1413.98 $311,001.00 to $312,000.00 $2,180.95 $1417.62 $312,001.00 to $313,000.00 $2,186.55 $1421.26 $313,001.00 to $314,000.00 $2,192.15 $1424.90 $314,001.00 to $315,000.00 $2,197.75 $1428.54 $315,001.00 to $316,000.00 $2,203.35 $1432.18 $316,001.00 to $317,000.00 $2,208.95 $1435.82 $317,001.00 to $318,000.00 $2,214.55 $1439.46 $318,001.00 to $319,000.00 $2,220.15 $1443.10 $319,001.00 to $320,000.00 $2,225.75 $1446.74 $320,001.00 to $321,000.00 $2,231.35 $1450.38 $321,001.00 to $322,000.00 $2,236.95 $1454.02 $322,001.00 to $323,000.00 $2,242.55 $1457.66 $323,001.00 to $324,000.00 $2,248.15 $1461.30 $324,001.00 to $325,000.00 $2,253.75 $1464.94 $325,001.00 to $326,000.00 $2,259.35 $1468.58 $326,001.00 to $327,000.00 $2,264.95 $1472.22 $327,001.00 to $328,000.00 $2,270.55 $1475.86 $328,001.00 to $329,000.00 $2,276.15 $1479.50 $329,001.00 to $330,000.00 $2,281.75 $1483.14 $330,001.00 to $331,000.00 $2,287.35 $1486.78 $331,001.00 to $332,000.00 $2,292.95 $1490.42 $332,001.00 to $333,000.00 $2,298.55 $1494.06 $333,001.00 to $334,000.00 $2,304.15 $1497.70 $334,001.00 to $335,000.00 $2,309.75 $1501.34 $335,001.00 to $336,000.00 $2,315.35 $1504.98 $336,001.00 to $337,000.00 $2,320.95 $1508.62 $337,001.00 to $338,000.00 $2,326.55 $1512.26 $338,001.00 to $339,000.00 $2,332.15 $1515.90 $339,001.00 to $340,000.00 $2,337.75 $1519.54 $340,001.00 to $341,000.00 $2,343.35 $1523.18 $341,001.00 to $342,000.00 $2,348.95 $1526.82 $342,001.00 to $343,000.00 $2,354.55 $1530.46 $343,001.00 to $344,000.00 $2,360.15 $1534.10 $344,001.00 to $345,000.00 $2,365.75 $1537.74 $345,001.00 to $346,000.00 $2,371.35 $1541.38 Attachment A - pg 4 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $346,001.00 to $347,000.00 $2,376.95 $1545.02 $347,001.00 to $348,000.00 $2,382.55 $1548.66 $348,001.00 to $349,000.00 $2,388.15 $1552.30 $349,001.00 to $350,000.00 $2,393.75 $1555.94 $350,001.00 to $351,000.00 $2,399.35 $1559.58 $351,001.00 to $352,000.00 $2,404.95 $1563.22 $352,001.00 to $353,000.00 $2,410.55 $1566.86 $353,001.00 to $354,000.00 $2,416.15 $1570.50 $354,001.00 to $355,000.00 $2,421.75 $1574.14 $355,001.00 to $356,000.00 $2,427.35 $1577.78 $356,001.00. to $357,000.00 $2,432.95 $1581.42 $357,001.00 to $358,000.00 $2,438.55 $1585.06 $358,001.00 to $359,000.00 $2,444.15 $1588.70 $359,001.00 to $360,000.00 $2,449.75 $1592.34 $360,001.00 to $361,000.00 $2,455.35 $1595.98 $361,001.00 to $362,000.00 $2,460.95 $1599.62 $362,001.00 to $363,000.00 $2,466.55 $1603.26 $363,001.00 to $364,000.00 $2,472.15 $1606.90 $364,001.00 to $365,000.00 $2,477.75 $1610.54 $365,001.00 to $366,000.00 $2,483.35 $1614.18 $366,001.00 to $367,000.00 $2,488.95 $1617.82 $367,001.00 to $368,000.00 $2,494.55 $1621.46 $368,001.00 to $369,000.00 $2,500.15 $1625.10 $369,001.00 to $370,000.00 $2,505.75 $1628.74 $370,001.00 to $371,000.00 $2,511.35 $1632.38 $371,001.00 to $372,000.00 $2,516.95 $1636.02 $372,001.00 to $373,000.00 $2,522.55 $1639.66 $373,001.00 to $374,000.00 $2,528.15 $1643.30 $374,001.00 to $375,000.00 $2,533.75 $1646.94 $375,001.00 to $376,000.00 $2,539.35 $1650.58 $376,001.00 to $377,000.00 $2,544.95 $1654.22 $377,001.00 to $378,000.00 $2,550.55 $1657.86 $378,001.00 to $379,000.00 $2,556.15 $1661.50 $379,001.00 to $380,000.00 $2,561.75 $1665.14 $380,001.00 to $381,000.00 $2,567.35 $1668.78 $381,001.00 to $382,000.00 $2,572.95 $1672.42 $382,001.00 to $383,000.00 $2,578.55 $1676.06 $383,001.00 to $384,000.00 $2,584.15 $1679.70 $384,001.00 to $385,000.00 $2,589.75 $1683.34 $385,001.00 to $386,000.00 $2,595.35 $1686.98 $386,001.00 to $387,000.00 $2,600.95 $1690.62 $387,001.00 to $388,000.00 $2,606.55 $1694.26 $388,001.00 to $389,000.00 $2,612.15 $1697.90 $389,001.00 to $390,000.00 $2,617.75 $1701.54 $390,001.00 to $391,000.00 $2,623.35 $1705.18 page 24 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $391,001.00 to $392,000.00 $2,628.95 $1708.82 $392,001.00 to $393,000.00 $2,634.55 $1712.46 $393,001.00 to $394,000.00 $2,640.15 $1716.10 $394,001.00 to $395,000.00 $2,645.75 $1719.74 $395,001.00 to $396,000.00 $2,651.35 $1723.38 $396,001.00 to $397,000.00 $2,656.95 $1727.02 $397,001.00 to $398,000.00 $2,662.55 $1730.66 $398,001.00 to $399,000.00 $2,668.15 $1734.30 $399,001.00 to $400,000.00 $2,673.75 $1737.94 $400,001.00 to $401,000.00 $2,679.35 $1741.58 $401,001.00 to $402,000.00 $2,684.95 $1745.22 $402,001.00 to $403,000.00 $2,690.55 $1748.86 $403,001.00 to $404,000.00 $2,696.15 $1752.50 $404,001.00 to $405,000.00 $2,701.75 $1756.14 $405,001.00 to $406,000.00 $2,707.35 $1759.78 $406,001.00 to $407,000.00 $2,712.95 $1763.42 $407,001.00 to $408,000.00 $2,718.55 $1767.06 $408,001.00 to $409,000.00 $2,724.15 $1770.70 $409,001.00 to $410,000.00 $2,729.75 $1774.34 $410,001.00 to $411,000.00 $2,735.35 $1777.98 $411,001.00 to $412,000.00 $2,740.95 $1781.62 $412,001.00 to $413,000.00 $2,746.55 $1785.26 $413,001.00 to $414,000.00 $2,752.15 $1788.90 $414,001.00 to $415,000.00 $2,757.75 $1792.54 $415,001.00 to $416,000.00 $2,763.35 $1796.18 $416,001.00 to $417,000.00 $2,768.95 $1799.82 $417,001.00 to $418,000.00 $2,774.55 $1803.46 $418,001.00 to $419,000.00 $2,780.15 $1807.10 $419,001.00 to $420,000.00 $2,785.75 $1810.74 $420,001.00 to $421,000.00 $2,791.35 $1814.38 $421,001.00 to $422,000.00 $2,796.95 $1818.02 $422,001.00 to $423,000.00 $2,802.55 $1821.66 $423,001.00 to $424,000.00 $2,808.15 $1825.30 $424,001.00 to $425,000.00 $2,813.75 $1828.94 $425,001.00 to $426,000.00 $2,819.35 $1832.58 $426,001.00 to $427,000.00 $2,824.95 $1836.22 $427,001.00 to $428,000.00 $2,830.55 $1839.86 $428,001.00 to $429,000_00 $2,836.15 $1843.50 $429,001.00 to $430,000.00 $2,841.75 $1847.14 $430,001.00 to $431,000.00 $2,847.35 $1850.78 $431,001.00 to $432,000.00 $2,852.95 $1854.42 $432,001.00 to $433,000.00 $2,858.55 $1858.06 $433,001.00 to $434,000.00 $2,864.15 $1861.70 $434,001.00 to $435,000.00 $2,869.75 $1865.34 $435,001.00 to $436,000.00 $2,875.35 $1868.98 Attachment A - pg 5 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $436,001.00 to $437,000.00 $2,880.95 $1872.62 $437,001.00 to $438,000.00 $2,886.55 $1876.26 $438,001.00 to $439,000.00 $2,892.15 $1879.90 $439,001.00 to $440,000.00 $2,897.75 $1883.54 $440,001.00 to $441,000.00 $2,903.35 $1887.18 $441,001.00 to $442,000.00 $2,908.95 $1890.82 $442,001.00 to $443,000.00 $2,914.55 $1894.46 $443,001.00 to $444,000.00 $2,920.15 $1898.10 $444,001.00 to $445,000.00 $2,925.75 $1901.74 $445,001.00 to $446,000.00 $2,931.35 $1905.38 $446,001.00 to $447,000.00 $2,936.95 $1909.02 $447,001.00 to $448,000.00 $2,942.55 $1912.66 $448,001.00 to $449,000.00 $2,948.15 $1916.30 $449,001.00 to $450,000.00 $2,953.75 $1919.94 $450,001.00 to $451,000.00 $2,959.35 $1923.58 $451,001.00 to $452,000.00 $2,964.95 $1927.22 $452,001.00 to $453,000.00 $2,970.55 $1930.86 $453,001.00 to $454,000.00 $2,976.15 $1934.50 $454,001.00 to $455,000.00 $2,981.75 $1938.14 $455,001.00 to $456,000.00 $2,987.35 $1941.78 $456,001.00 to $457,000.00 $2,992.95 $1945.42 $457,001.00 to $458,000.00 $2,998.55 $1949.06 $458,001.00 to $459,000.00 $3,004.15 $1952.70 $459,001.00 to $460,000.00 $3,009.75 $1956.34 $460,001.00 to $461,000.00 $3,015.35 $1959.98 $461,001.00 to $462,000.00 $3,020.95 $1963.62 $462,001.00 to $463,000.00 $3,026.55 $1967.26 $463,001.00 to $464,000.00 $3,032.15 $1970.90 $464,001.00 to $465,000.00 $3,037.75 $1974.54 $465,001.00 to $466,000.00 $3,043.35 $1978.18 $466,001.09 to $467,000.00 $3,048.95 $1981.82 $467,001.00 to $468,000.00 $3,054.55 $1985.46 $468,001.00 to $469,000.00 $3,060.15 $1989.10 $469,001.00 to $470,000.00 $3,065.75 $1992.74 $470,001.00 to $471,000.00 $3,071.35 $1996.38 $471,001.00 to $472,000.00 $3,076.95 $2000.02 $472,001.00 to $473,000.00 $3,082.55 $2003.66 $473,001.00 to $474,000.00 $3,088.15 $2007.30 $474,001.00 to $475,000.00 $3,093.75 $2010.94 $475,001.00 to $476,000.00 $3,099.35 $2014.58 $476,001.00 to $477,000.00 $3,104.95 $2018.22 $477,001.00 to $478,000.00 $3,110.55 $2021.86 $478,001.00 to $479,000.00 $3,116.15 $2025.50 $479,001.00 to $480,000.00 $3,121.75 $2029.14 $480,001.00 to $481,000.00 $3,127.35 $2032.78 page 25 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $481,001.00 to $482,000.00 $3,132.95 $2036.42 $482,001.00 to $483,000.00 $3,138.55 $2040.06 $483,001.00 to $484,000.00 $3,144.15 $2043.70 $484,001.00 to $485,000.00 $3,149.75 $2047.34 $485,001.00 to $486,000.00 $3,155.35 $2050.98 $486,001.00 to $487,000.00 $3,160.95 $2054.62 $487,001.00 to $488,000.00 $3,166.55 $2058.26 $488,001.00 to $489,000.00 $3,172.15 $2061.90 $489,001.00 to $490,000.00 $3,177.75 $2065.54 $490,001.00 to $491,000.00 $3,183.35 $2069.18 $491,001.00 to $492,000.00 $3,188.95 $2072.82 $492,001.00 to $493,000.00 $3,194.55 $2076.46 $493,001.00 to $494,000.00 $3,200.15 $2080.10 $494,001.00 to $495,000.00 $3,205.75 $2083.74 $495,001.00 to $496,000.00 $3,211.35 $2087.38 $496,001.00 to $497,000.00 $3,216.95 $2091.02 $497,001.00 to $498,000.00 $3,222.55 $2094.66 $498,001.00 to $499,000.00 $3,228.15 $2098.30 $499,001.00 to $500,000.00 $3,233.75 $2101.94 $500,001.00 to $501,000.00 $3,238.50 $2105.03 $501,001.00 to $502,000.00 $3,243.25 $2108.11 $502,001.00 to $503,000.00 $3,248.00 $2111.20 $503,001.00 to $504,000.00 $3,252.75 $2114.29 $504,001.00 to $505,000.00 $3,257.50 $2117.38 $505,001.00 to $506,000.00 $3,262.25 $2120.46 $506,001.00 to $507,000.00 $3,267.00 $2123.55 $507,001.00 to $508,000.00 $3,271.75 $2126.64 $508,001.00 to $509,000.00 $3,276.50 $2129.73 $509,001.00 to $510,000.00 $3,281.25 $2132.81 $510,001.00 to $511,000.00 $3,286.00 $2135.90 $511,001.00 to $512,000.00 $3,290.75 $2138.99 $512,001.00 to $513,000.00 $3,295.50 $2142.08 $513,001.00 to $514,000.00 $3,300.25 $2145.16 $514,001.00 to $515,000.00 $3,305.00 $2148.25 $515,001.00 to $516,000.00 $3,309.75 $2151.34 $516,001.00 to $517,000.00 $3,314.50 $2154.43 $517,001.00 to $518,000.00 $3,319.25 $2157.51 $518,001.00 to $519,000.00 $3,324.00 $2160.60 $519,001.00 to $520,000.00 $3,328.75 $2163.69 $520,001.00 to $521,000.00 $3,333.50 $2166.78 $521,001.00 to $522,000.00 $3,338.25 $2169.86 $522,001.00 to $523,000.00 $3,343.00 $2172.95 $523,001.00 to $524,000.00 $3,347.75 $2176.04 $524,001.00 to $525,000.00 $3,352.50 $2179.13 $525,001.00 to $526,000.00 $3,357.25 $2182.21 Attachment A - pg 6 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $526,001.00 to $527,000.00 $3,362.00 $2185.30 $527,001.00 to $528,000.00 $3,366.75 $2188.39 $528,001.00 to $529,000.00 $3,371.50 $2191.48 $529,001.00 to $530,000.00 $3,376.25 $2194.56 $530,001.00 to $531,000.00 $3,381.00 $2197.65 $531,001.00 to $532,000.00 $3,385.75 $2200.74 $532,001.00 to $533,000.00 $3,390.50 $2203.83 $533,001.00 to $534,000.00 $3,395.25 $2206.91 $534,001.00 to $535,000.00 $3,400.00 $2210.00 $535,001.00 to $536,000.00 $3,404.75 $2213.09 $536,001.00 to $537,000.00 $3,409.50 $2216.18 $537,001.00 to $538,000.00 $3,414.25 $2219.26 $538,001.00 to $539,000.00 $3,419.00 $2222.35 $539,001.00 to $540,000.00 $3,423.75 $2225.44 $540,001.00 to $541,000.00 $3,428.50 $2228.53 $541,001.00 to $542,000.00 $3,433.25 $2231.61 $542,001.00 to $543,000.00 $3,438.00 $2234.70 $543,001.00 to $544,000.00 $3,442.75 $2237.79 $544,001.00 to $545,000.00 $3,447.50 $2240.88 $545,001.00 to $546,000.00 $3,452.25 $2243.96 $546,001.00 to $547,000.00 $3,457.00 $2247.05 $547,001.00 to $548,000.00 $3,461.75 $2250.14 $548,001.00 to $549,000.00 $3,466.50 $2253.23 $549,001.00 to $550,000.00 $3,471.25 $2256.31 $550,001.00 to $551,000.00 $3,476.00 $2259.40 $551,001.00 to $552,000.00 $3,480.75 $2262.49 $552,001.00 to $553,000.00 $3,485.50 $2265.58 $553,001.00 to $554,000.00 $3,490.25 $2268.66 $554,001.00 to $555,000.00 $3,495.00 $2271.75 $555,001.00 to $556,000.00 $3,499.75 $2274.84 $556,001.00 to $557,000.00 $3,504.50 $2277.93 $557,001.00 to $558,000.00 $3,509.25 $2281.01 $558,001.00 to $559,000.00 $3,514.00 $2284.10 $559,001.00 to $560,000.00 $3,518.75 $2287.19 $560,001.00 to $561,000.00 $3,523.50 $2290.28 $561,001.00 to $562,000.00 $3,528.25 $2293.36 $562,001.00 to $563,000.00 $3,533.00 $2296.45 $563,001.00 to $564,000.00 $3,537.75 $2299.54 $564,001.00 to $565,000.00 $3,542.50 $2302.63 $565,001.00 to $566,000.00 $3,547.25 $2305.71 $566,001.00 to $567,000.00 $3,552.00 $2308.80 $567,001.00 to $568,000.00 $3,556.75 $2311.89 $568,001.00 to $569,000.00 $3,561.50 $2314.98 $569,001.00 to $570,000.00 $3,566.25 $2318.06 $570,001.00 to $571,000.00 $3,571.00 $2321.15 page 26 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $571,001.00 to $572,000.00 $3,575.75 $2324.24 $572,001.00 to $573,000.00 $3,580.50 $2327.33 $573,001.00 to $574,000.00 $3,585.25 $2330.41 $574,001.00 to $575,000.00 $3,590.00 $2333.50 $575,001.00 to $576,000.00 $3,594.75 $2336.59 $576,001.00 to $577,000.00 $3,599.50 $2339.68 $577,001.00 to $578,000.00 $3,604.25 $2342.76 $578,001.00 to $579,000.00 $3,609.00 $2345.85 $579,001.00 to $580,000.00 $3,613.75 $2348.94 $580,001.00 to $581,000.00 $3,618.50 $2352.03 $581,001.00 to $582,000.00 $3,623.25 $2355.11 $582,001.00 to $583,000.00 $3,628.00 $2358.20 $583,001.00 to $584,000.00 $3,632.75 $2361.29 $584,001.00 to $585,000.00 $3,637.50 $2364.38 $585,001.00 to $586,000.00 $3,642.25 $2367.46 $586,001.00 to $587,000.00 $3,647.00 $2370.55 $587,001.00 to $588,000.00 $3,651.75 $2373.64 $588,001.00 to $589,000.00 $3,656.50 $2376.73 $589,001.00 to $590,000.00 $3,661.25 $2379.81 $590,001.00 to $591,000.00 $3,666.00 $2382.90 $591,001.00 to $592,000.00 $3,670.75 $2385.99 $592,001.00 to $593,000.00 $3,675.50 $2389.08 $593,001.00 to $594,000.00 $3,680.25 $2392.16 $594,001.00 to $595,000.00 $3,685.00 $2395.25 $595,001.00 to $596,000.00 $3,689.75 $2398.34 $596,001.00 to $597,000.00 $3,694.50 $2401.43 $597,001.00 to $598,000.00 $3,699.25 $2404.51 $598,001.00 to $599,000.00 $3,704.00 $2407.60 $599,001.00 to $600,000.00 $3,708.75 $2410.69 $600,001.00 to $601,000.00 $3,713.50 $2413.78 $601,001.00 to $602,000.00 $3,718.25 $2416.86 $602,001.00 to $603,000.00 $3,723.00 $2419.95 $603,001.00 to $604,000.00 $3,727.75 $2423.04 $604,001.00 to $605,000.00 $3,732.50 $2426.13 $605,001.00 to $606,000.00 $3,737.25 $2429.21 $606,001.00 to $607,000.00 $3,742.00 $2432.30 $607,001.00 to $608,000.00 $3,746.75 $2435.39 $608,001.00 to $609,000.00 $3,751.50 $2438.48 $609,001.00 to $610,000.00 $3,756.25 $2441.56 $610,001.00 to $611,000.00 $3,761.00 $2444.65 $611,001.00 to $612,000.00 $3,765.75 $2447.74 $612,001.00 to $613,000.00 $3,770.50 $2450.83 $613,001.00 to $614,000.00 $3,775.25 $2453.91 $614,001.00 to $615,000.00 $3,780.00 $2457.00 $615,001.00 to $616,000.00 $3,784.75 $2460.09 Attachment A - pg 7 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $616,001.00 to $617,000.00 $3,789.50 $2463.18 $617,001.00 to $618,000.00 $3,794.25 $2466.26 $618,001.00 to $619,000.00 $3,799.00 $2469.35 $619,001.00 to $620,000.00 $3,803.75 $2472.44 $620,001.00 to $621,000.00 $3,808.50 $2475.53 $621,001.00 to $622,000.00 $3,813.25 $2478.61 $622,001.00 to $623,000.00 $3,818.00 $2481.70 $623,001.00 to $624,000.00 $3,822.75 $2484.79 $624,001.00 to $625,000.00 $3,827.50 $2487.88 $625,001.00 to $626,000.00 $3,832.25 $2490.96 $626,001.00 to $627,000.00 $3,837.00 $2494.05 $627,001.00 to $628,000.00 $3,841.75 $2497.14 $628,001.00 to $629,000.00 $3,846.50 $2500.23 $629,001.00 to $630,000.00 $3,851.25 $2503.31 $630,001.00 to $631,000.00 $3,856.00 $2506.40 $631,001.00 to $632,000.00 $3,860.75 $2509.49 $632,001.00 to $633,000.00 $3,865.50 $2512.58 $633,001.00 to $634,000.00 $3,870.25 $2515.66 $634,001.00 to $635,000.00 $3,875.00 $2518.75 $635,001.00 to $636,000.00 $3,879.75 $2521.84 $636,001.00 to $637,000.00 $3,884.50 $2524.93 $637,001.00 to $638,000.00 $3,889.25 $2528.01 $638,001.00 to $639,000.00 $3,894.00 $2531.10 $639,001.00 to $640,000.00 $3,898.75 $2534.19 $640,001.00 to $641,000.00 $3,903.50 $2537.28 $641,001.00 to $642,000.00 $3,908.25 $2540.36 $642,001.00 to $643,000.00 $3,913.00 $2543.45 $643,001.00 to $644,000.00 $3,917.75 $2546.54 $644,001.00 to $645,000.00 $3,922.50 $2549.63 $645,001.00 to $646,000.00 $3,927.25 $2552.71 $646,001.00 to $647,000.00 $3,932.00 $2555.80 $647,001.00 to $648,000.00 $3,936.75 $2558.89 $648,001.00 to $649,000.00 $3,941.50 $2561.98 $649,001.00 to $650,001.00 to $651,001.00 to $652,001.00 to $653,001.00 to $654,001.00 to $655,001.00 to $656,001.00 to $657,001.00 to $658,001.00 to $659,001.00 to $660,001.00 to $650,000.00 $651,000.00 $652,000.00 $653,000.00 $654,000.00 $655,000.00 $656,000.00 $657,000.00 $658,000.00 $659,000.00 $660,000.00 $661,000.00 $3,946.25 $3,951.00 $3,955.75 $3,960.50 $3,965.25 $3,970.00 $3,974.75 $3,979.50 $3,984.25 $3,989.00 $3,993.75 $3,998.50 $2565.06 $2568.15 $2571.24 $2574.33 $2577.41 $2580.50 $2583.59 $2586.68 $2589.76 $2592.85 $2595.94 $2599.03 page 27 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $661,001.00 to $662,000.00 $4,003.25 $2602.11 $662,001.00 to $663,000.00 $4,008.00 $2605.20 $663,001.00 to $664,000.00 $4,012.75 $2608.29 $664,001.00 to $665,000.00 $4,017.50 $2611.38 $665,001.00 to $666,000.00 $4,022.25 $2614.46 $666,001.00 to $667,000.00 $4,027.00 $2617.55 $667,001.00 to $668,000.00 $4,031.75 $2620.64 $668,001.00 to $669,000.00 $4,036.50 $2623.73 $669,001.00 to $670,000.00 $4,041.25 $2626.81 $670,001.00 to $671,000.00 $4,046.00 $2629.90 $671,001.00 to $672,000.00 $4,050.75 $2632.99 $672,001.00 to $673,000.00 $4,055.50 $2636.08 $673,001.00 to $674,000.00 $4,060.25 $2639.16 $674,001.00 to $675,000.00 $4,065.00 $2642.25 $675,001.00 to $676,000.00 $4,069.75 $2645.34 $676,001.00 to $677,000.00 $4,074.50 $2648.43 $677,001.00 to $678,000.00 $4,079.25 $2651.51 $678,001.00 to $679,000.00 $4,084.00 $2654.60 $679,001.00 to $680,000.00 $4,088.75 $2657.69 $680,001.00 to $681,000.00 $4,093.50 $2660.78 $681,001.00 to $682,000.00 $4,098.25 $2663.86 $682,001.00 to $683,000.00 $4,103.00 $2666.95 $683,001.00 to $684,000.00 $4,107.75 $2670.04 $684,001.00 to $685,000.00 $4,112.50 $2673.13 $685,001.00 to $686,000.00 $4,117.25 $2676.21 $686,001.00 to $687,000.00 $4,122.00 $2679.30 $687,001.00 to $688,000.00 $4,126.75 $2682.39 $688,001.00 to $689,000.00 $4,131.50 $2685.48 $689,001.00 to $690,000.00 $4,136.25 $2688.56 $690,001.00 to $691,000.00 $4,141.00 $2691.65 $691,001.00 to $692,000.00 $4,145.75 $2694.74 $692,001.00 to $693,000.00 $4,150.50 $2697.83 $693,001.00 to $694,000.00 $4,155.25 $2700.91 $694,001.00 to $695,000.00 $4,160.00 $2704.00 $695,001.00 to $696,000.00 $4,164.75 $2707.09 $696,001.00 to $697,000.00 $4,169.50 $2710.18 $697,001.00 to $698,000.00 $4,174.25 $2713.26 $698,001.00 to $699,000.00 $4,179.00 $2716.35 $699,001.00 to $700,000.00 $4,183.75 $2719.44 $700,001.00 to $701,000.00 $4,188.50 $2722.53 $701,001.00 to $702,000.00 $4,193.25 $2725.61 $702,001.00 to $703,000.00 $4,198.00 $2728.70 $703,001.00 to $704,000.00 $4,202.75 $2731.79 $704,001.00 to $705,000.00 $4,207.50 $2734.88 $705,001.00 to $706,000.00 $4,212.25 $2737.96 Attachment A - pg 8 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Plan $751,001.00 to $752,000.00 Fees Review $706,001.00 to $707,000.00 $4,217.00 $2741.05 $707,001.00 to $708,000.00 $4,221.75 $2744.14 $708,001.00 to $709,000.00 $4,226.50 $2747.23 $709,001.00 to $710,000.00 $4,231.25 $2750.31 $710,001.00 to $711,000.00 $4,236.00 $2753.40 $711,001.00 to $712,000.00 $4,240.75 $2756.49 $712,001.00 to $713,000.00 $4,245.50 $2759.58 $713,001.00 to $714,000.00 $4,250.25 $2762.66 $714,001.00 to $715,000.00 $4,255.00 $2765.75 $715,001.00 to $716,000.00 $4,259.75 $2768.84 $716,001.00 to $717,000.00 $4,264.50 $2771.93 $717,001.00 to $718,000.00 $4,269.25 $2775.01 $718,001.00 to $719,000.00 $4,274.00 $2778.10 $719,001.00 to $720,000.00 $4,278.75 $2781.19 $720,001.00 to $721,000.00 $4,283.50 $2784.28 $721,001.00 to $722,000.00 $4,288.25 $2787.36 $722,001.00 to $723,000.00 $4,293.00 $2790.45 $723,001.00 to $724,000.00 $4,297.75 $2793.54 $724,001.00 to $725,000.00 $4,302.50 $2796.63 $725,001.00 to $726,000.00 $4,307.25 $2799.71 $726,001.00 to $727,000.00 $4,312.00 $2802.80 $727,001.00 to $728,000.00 $4,316.75 $2805.89 $728,001.00 to $729',000.00 $4,321.50 $2808.98 $729,001.00 to $730,000.00 $4,326.25 $2812.06 $730,001.00 to $731,000.00 $4,331.00 $2815.15 $731,001.00 to $732,000.00 $4,335.75 $2818.24 $732,001.00 to $733,000.00 $4,340.50 $2821.33 $733,001.00 to $734,000.00 $4,345.25 $2824.41 $734,001.00 to $735,000.00 $4,350.00 $2827.50 $735,001.00 to $736,000.00 $4,354.75 $2830.59 $736,001.00 to $737,000.00 $4,359.50 $2833.68 $737,001.00 to $738,000.00 $4,364.25 $2836.76 $738,001.00 to $739,000.00 $4,369.00 $2839.85 $739,001.00 to $740,000.00 $4,373.75 $2842.94 $740,001.00 to $741,000.00 $4,378.50 $2846.03 $741,001.00 to $742,000.00 $4,383.25 $2849.11 $742,001.00 to $743,000.00 $4,388.00 $2852.20 $743,001.00 to $744,000.00 $4,392.75 $2855.29 $744,001.00 to $745,000.00 $4,397.50 $2858.38 $745,001.00 to $746,000.00 $4,402.25 $2861.46 $746,001.00 to $747,000.00 $4,407.00 $2864.55 $747,001.00 to $748,000.00 $4,411.75 $2867.64 $748,001.00 to $749,000.00 $4,416.50 $2870.73 $749,001.00 to $750,000.00 $4,421.25 $2873.81 $750,001.00 to $751,000.00 $4,426.00 $2876.90 page 28 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $751,001.00 to $752,000.00 $4,430.75 $2879.99 $752,001.00 to $753,000.00 $4,435.50 $2883.08 $753,001.00 to $754,000.00 $4,440.25 $2886.16 $754,001.00 to $755,000.00 $4,445.00 $2889.25 $755,001.00 to $756,000.00 $4,449.75 $2892.34 $756,001.00 to $757,000.00 $4,454.50 $2895.43 $757,001.00 to $758,000.00 $4,459.25 $2898.51 $758,001.00 to $759,000.00 $4,464.00 $2901.60 $759,001.00 to $760,000.00 $4,468.75 $2904.69 $760,001.00 to $761,000.00 $4,473.50 $2907.78 $761,001.00 to $762,000.00 $4,478.25 $2910.86 $762,001.00 to $763,000.00 $4,483.00 $2913.95 $763,001.00 to $764,000.00 $4,487.75 $2917.04 $764,001.00 to $765,000.00 $4,492.50 $2920.13 $765,001.00 to $766,000.00 $4,497.25 $2923.21 $766,001.00 to $767,000.00 $4,502.00 $2926.30 $767,001.00 to $768,000.00 $4,506.75 $2929.39 $768,001.00 to $769,000.00 $4,511.50 $2932.48 $769,001.00 to $770,000.00 $4,516.25 $2935.56 $770,001.00 to $771,000.00 $4,521.00 $2938.65 $771,001.00 to $772,000.00 $4,525.75 $2941.74 $772,001.00 to $773,000.00 $4,530.50 $2944.83 $773,001.00 to $774,000.00 $4,535.25 $2947.91 $774,001.00 to $775,000.00 $4,540.00 $2951.00 $775,001.00 to $776,000.00 $4,544.75 $2954.09 $776,001.00 to $777,000.00 $4,549.50 $2957.18 $777,001.00 to $778,000.00 $4,554.25 $2960.26 $778,001.00 to $779,000.00 $4,559.00 $2963.35 $779,001.00 to $780,000.00 $4,563.75 $2966.44 $780,001.00 to $781,000.00 $4,568.50 $2969.53 $781,001.00 to $782,000.00 $4,573.25 $2972.61 $782,001.00 to $783,000.00 $4,578.00 $2975.70 $783,001.00 to $784,000.00 $4,582.75 $2978.79 $784,001.00 to $785,000.00 $4,587.50 $2981.88 $785,001.00 to $786,000.00 $4,592.25 $2984.96 $786,001.00 to $787,000.00 $4,597.00 $2988.05 $787,001.00 to $788,000.00 $4,601.75 $2991.14 $788,001.00 to $789,000.00 $4,606.50 $2994.23 $789,001.00 to $790,000.00 $4,611.25 $2997.31 $790,001.00 to $791,000.00 $4,616.00 $3000.40 $791,001.00 to $792,000.00 $4,620.75 $3003.49 $792,001.00 to $793,000.00 $4,625.50 $3006.58 $793,001.00 to $794,000.00 $4,630.25 $3009.66 $794,001.00 to $795,000.00 $4,635.00 $3012.75 $795,001.00 to $796,000.00 $4,639.75 $3015.84 Attachment A - pg 9 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Plan $841,001.00 to $842,000.00 Fees Review $796,001.00 to $797,000.00 $4,644.50 $3018.93 $797,001.00 to $798,000.00 $4,649.25 $3022.01 $798,001.00 to $799,000.00 $4,654.00 $3025.10 $799,001.00 to $800,000.00 $4,658.75 $3028.19 $800,001.00 to $801,000.00 $4,663.50 $3031.28 $801,001.00 to $802,000.00 $4,668.25 $3034.36 $802,001.00 to $803,000.00 $4,673.00 $3037.45 $803,001.00 to $804,000.00 $4,677.75 $3040.54 $804,001.00 to $805,000.00 $4,682.50 $3043.63 $805,001.00 to $806,000.00 $4,687.25 $3046.71 $806,001.00 to $807,000.00 $4,692.00 $3049.80 $807,001.00 to $808,000.00 $4,696.75 $3052.89 $808,001.00 to $809,000.00 $4,701.50 $3055.98 $809,001.00 to $810,000.00 $4,706.25 $3059.06 $810,001.00 to $811,000.00 $4,711.00 $3062.15 $811,001.00 to $812,000.00 $4,715.75 $3065.24 $812,001.00 to $813,000.00 $4,720.50 $3068.33 $813,001.00 to $814,000.00 $4,725.25 $3071.41 $814,001.00 to $815,000.00 $4,730.00 $3074.50 $815,001.00 to $816,000.00 $4,734.75 $3077.59 $816,001.00 to $817,000.00 $4,739.50 $3080.68 $817,001.00 to $818,000.00 $4,744.25 $3083.76 $818,001.00 to $819,000.00 $4,749.00 $3086.85 $819,001.00 to $820,000.00 $4,753.75 $3089.94 $820,001.00 to $821,000.00 $4,758.50 $3093.03 $821,001.00 to $822,000.00 $4,763.25 $3096.11 $822,001.00 to $823,000.00 $4,768.00 $3099.20 $823,001.00 to $824,000.00 $4,772.75 $3102.29 $824,001.00 to $825,000.00 $4,777.50 $3105.38 $825,001.00 to $826,000.00 $4,782.25 $3108.46 $826,001.00 to $827,000.00 $4,787.00 $3111.55 $827,001.00 to $828,000.00 $4,791.75 $3114.64 $828,001.00 to $829,000.00 $4,796.50 $3117.73 $829,001.00 to $830,000.00 $4,801.25 $3120.81 $830,001.00 to $831,000.00 $4,806.00 $3123.90 $831,001.00 to $832,000.00 $4,810.75 $3126.99 $832,001.00 to $833,000.00 $4,815.50 $3130.08 $833,001.00 to $834,000.00 $4,820.25 $3133.16 $834,001.00 to $835,000.00 $4,825.00 $3136.25 $835,001.00 to $836,000.00 $4,829.75 $3139.34 $836,001.00 to $837,000.00 $4,834.50 $3142.43 $837,001.00 to $838,000.00 $4,839.25 $3145.51 $838,001.00 to $839,000.00 $4,844.00 $3148.60 $839,001.00 to $840,000.00 $4,848.75 $3151.69 $840,001.00 to $841,000.00 $4,853.50 $3154.78 page 29 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $841,001.00 to $842,000.00 $4,858.25 $3157.86 $842,001.00 to $843,000.00 $4,863.00 $3160.95 $843,001.00 to $844,000.00 $4,867.75 $3164.04 $844,001.00 to $845,000.00 $4,872.50 $3167.13 $845,001.00 to $846,000.00 $4,877.25 $3170.21 $846,001.00 to $847,000.00 $4,882.00 $3173.30 $847,001.00 to $848,000.00 $4,886.75 $3176.39 $848,001.00 to $849,000.00 $4,891.50 $3179.48 $849,001.00 to $850,000.00 $4,896.25 $3182.56 $850,001.00 to $851,000.00 $4,901.00 $3185.65 $851,001.00 to $852,000.00 $4,905.75 $3188.74 $852,001.00 to $853,000.00 $4,910.50 $3191.83 $853,001.00 to $854,000.00 $4,915.25 $3194.91 $854,001.00 to $855,000.00 $4,920.00 $3198.00 $855,001.00 to $856,000.00 $4,924.75 $3201.09 $856,001.09 to $857,000.00 $4,929.50 $3204.18 $857,001.00 to $858,000.00 $4,934.25 $3207.26 $858,001.00 to $859,000.00 $4,939.00 $3210.35 $859,001.00 to $860,000.00 $4,943.75 $3213.44 $860,001.00 to $861,000.00 $4,948.50 $3216.53 $861,001.00 to $862,000.00 $4,953.25 $3219.61 $862,001.00 to $863,000.00 $4,958.00 $3222.70 $863,001.00 to $864,000.00 $4,962.75 $3225.79 $864,001.00 to $865,000.00 $4,967.50 $3228.88 $865,001.00 to $866,000.00 $4,972.25 $3231.96 $866,001.00 to $867,000.00 $4,977.00 $3235.05 $867,001.00 to $868,000.00 $4,981.75 $3238.14 $868,001.00 to $869,000.00 $4,986.50 $3241.23 $869,001.00 to $870,000.00 $4,991.25 $3244.31 $870,001.00 to $871,000.00 $4,996.00 $3247.40 $871,001.00 to $872,000.00 $5,000.75 $3250.49 $872,001.00 to $873,000.00 $5,005.50 $3253.58 $873,001.00 to $874,000.00 $5,010.25 $3256.66 $874,001.00 to $875,000.00 $5,015.00 $3259.75 $875,001.00 to $876,000.00 $5,019.75 $3262.84 $876,001.00 to $877,000.00 $5,024.50 $3265.93 $877,00 I.00 to $878,000.00 $5,029.25 $3269.01 $878,001.00 to $879,000.00 $5,034.00 $3272.10 $879,001.00 to $880,000.00 $5,038.75 $3275.19 $880,001.00 to $881,000.00 $5,043.50 $3278.28 $881,001.00 to $882,000.00 $5,048.25 $3281.36 $882,001.00 to $883,000.00 $5,053.00 $3284.45 $883,001.00 to $884,000.00 $5,057.75 3287.54 $884,001.00 to $885,000.00 $5,062.50 3290.63 to $886,000.00 $5,067.25 $3293.71$885,001.00 Attachment A - pg 10 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $886,001.00 to $887,000.00 $5,072.00 $3296.80 $887,001.00 to $888,000.00 $5,076.75 $3299.89 $888,001.00 to $889,000.00 $5,081.50 $3302.98 $889,001.00 to $890,000.00 $5,086.25 $3306.06 $890,001.00 to $891,000.00 $5,091.00 $3309.15 $891,001.00 to $892,000.00 $5,095.75 $3312.24 $892,001.00 to $893,000.00 $5,100.50 $3315.33 $893,001.00 to $894,000.00 $5,105.25 $3318.41 $894,001.00 to $895,000.00 $5,110.00 $3321.50 $895,001.00 to $896,000.00 $5,114.75 $3324.59 $896,001.00 to $897,000.00 $5,119.50 $3327.68 $897,001.00 to $898,000.00 $5,124.25 $3330.76 $898,001.00 to $899,000.00 $5,129.00 $3333.85 $899,001.00 to $900,000.00 $5,133.75 $3336.94 $900,001.00 to $901,000.00 $5,138.50 $3340.03 $901,001.00 to $902,000.00 $5,143.25 $3343.11 $902,001.00 to $903,000.00 $5,148.00 $3346.20 $903,001.00 to $904,000.00 $5,152.75 $3349.29 $904,001.00 to $905,000.00 $5,157.50 $3352.38 $905,001.00 to $906,000.00 $5,162.25 $3355.46 $906,001.00 to $907,000.00 $5,167.00 $3358.55 $907,001.00 to $908,000.00 $5,171.75 $3361.64 $908,001.00 to $909,000.00 $5,176.50 $3364.73 $909,001.00 to $910,000.00 $5,181.25 $3367.81 $910,001.00 to $911,000.00 $5,186.00 $3370.90 $911,001.00 to $912,000.00 $5,190.75 $3373.99 $912,001.00 to $913,000.00 $5,195.50 $3377.08 $913,001.00 to $914,000.00 $5,200.25 $3380.16 $914,001.00 to $915,000.00 $5,205.00 $3383.25 $915,001.00 to $916,000.00 $5,209.75 $3386.34 $916,001.00 to $917,000.00 $5,214.50 $3389.43 $917,001.00 to $918,000.00 $5,219.25 $3392.51 $918,001.00 to $919,000.00 $5,224.00 $3395.60 $919,001.00 to $920,000.00 $5,228.75 $3398.69 $920,001.00 to $921,000.00 $5,233.50 $3401.78 $921,001.00 to $922,000.00 $5,238.25 $3404.86 $922,001.00 to $923,000.00 $5,243.00 $3407.95 $923,001.00 to $924,000.00 $5,247.75 $3411.04 $924,001.00 to $925,000.00 $5,252.50 $3414.13 $925,001.00 to $926,000.00 $5,257.25 $3417.21 $926,001.00 to $927,000.00 $5,262.00 $3420.30 $927,001.00 to $928,000.00 $5,266.75 $3423.39 $928,001.00 to $929,000.00 $5,271.50 $3426.48 $929,001.00 to $930,000.00 $5,276.25 $3429.56 $930,001.00 to $931,000.00 $5,281.00 $3432.65 page 30 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $931,001.00 to $932,000.00 $5,285.75 $3435.74 $932,001.00 to $933,000.00 $5,290.50 $3438.83 $933,001.00 to $934,000.00 $5,295.25 $3441.91 $934,001.00 to $935,000.00 $5,300.00 $3445.00 $935,001.00 to $936,000.00 $5,304.75 $3448.09 $936,001.00 to $937,000.00 $5,309.50 $3451.18 $937,001.00 to $938,000.00 $5,314.25 $3454.26 $938,001.00 to $939,000.00 $5,319.00 $3457.35 $939,001.00 to $940,000.00 $5,323.75 $3460.44 $940,001.00 to $941,000.00 $5,328.50 $3463.53 $941,001.00 to $942,000.00 $5,333.25 $3466.61 $942,001.00 to $943,000.00 $5,338.00 $3469.70 $943,001.00 to $944,000.00 $5,342.75 $3472.79 $944,001.00 to $945,000.00 $5,347.50 $3475.88 $945,001.00 to $946,000.00 $5,352.25 $3478.96 $946,001.00 to $947,000.00 $5,357.00 $3482.05 $947,001.00 to $948,000.00 $5,361.75 $3485.14 $948,001.00 to $949,000.00 $5,366.50 $3488.23 $949,001.00 to $950,000.00 $5,371.25 $3491.31 $950,001.00 to $951,000.00 $5,376.00 $3494.40 $951,001.00 to $952,000.00 $5,380.75 $3497.49 $952,001.00 to $953,000.00 $5,385.50 $3500.58 $953,001.00 to $954,000.00 $5,390.25 $3503.66 $954,001.00 to $955,000.00 $5,395.00 $3506.75 $955,001.00 to $956,000.00 $5,399.75 $3509.84 $956,001.00 to $957,000.00 $5,404.50 $3512.93 $957,001.00 to $958,000.00 $5,409.25 $3516.01 $958,001.00 to $959,000.00 $5,414.00 $3519.10 $959,001.00 to $960,000.00 $5,418.75 $3522.19 $960,001.00 to $961,000.00 $5,423.50 $3525.28 $961,001.00 to $962,000.00 $5,428.25 $3528.36 $962,001.00 to $963,000.00 $5,433.00 $3531.45 $963,001.00 to $964,000.00 $5,437.75 $3534.54 $964,001.00 to $965,000.00 $5,442.50 $3537.63 $965,001.00 to $966,000.00 $5,447.25 $3540.71 $966,001.00 to $967,000.00 $5,452.00 $3543.80 $967,001.00 to $968,000.00 $5,456.75 $3546.89 $968,001.00 to $969,000.00 $5,461.50 $3549.98 $969,001.00 to $970,000.00 $5,466.25 $3553.06 $970,001.00 to $971,000.00 $5,471.00 $3556.15 $971,001.00 to $972,000.00 $5,475.75 $3559.24 $972,001.00 to $973,000.00 $5,480.50 $3562.33 $973,001.00 to $974,000.00 $5,485.25 $3565.41 $974,001.00 to $975,000.00 $5,490.00 $3568.50 $975,001.00 to $976,000.00 $5,494.75 $3571.59 Attachment A - pg 11 of 12 City of Mendota Heights - Building Permit Fees Valuation Permit Fees Plan Review $976,001.00 to $977,000.00 $5,499.50 $3574.68 $977,001.00 to $978,000.00 $5,504.25 $3577.76 $978,001.00 to $979,000.00 $5,509.00 $3580.85 $979,001.00 to $980,000.00 $5,513.75 $3583.94 $980,001.00 to $981,000.00 $5,518.50 $3587.03 $981,001.00 to $982,000.00 $5,523.25 $3590.11 $982,001.00 to $983,000.00 $5,528.00 $3593.20 $983,001.00 to $984,000.00 $5,532.75 $3596.29 $984,001.00 to $985,000.00 $5,537.50 $3599.38 $985,001.00 to $986,000.00 $5,542.25 $3602.46 $986,001.00 to $987,000.00 $5,547.00 $3605.55 $987,001.00 to $988,000.00 $5,551.75 $3608.64 $988,001.00 to $989,000.00 $5,556.50 $3611.73 $989,001.00 to $990,000.00 $5,561.25 $3614.81 $990,001.00 to $991,000.00 $5,566.00 $3617.90 $991,001.00 to $992,000.00 $5,570.75 $3620.99 $992,001.00 to $993,000.00 $5,575.50 $3624.08 $993,001.00 to $994,000.00 $5,580.25 $3627.16 $994,001.00 to $995,000.00 $5,585.00 $3630.25 $995,001.00 to $996,000.00 $5,589.75 $3633.34 $996,001.00 to $997,000.00 $5,594.50 $3636.43 $997,001.00 to $998,000.00 $5,599.25 $3639.51 $998,001.00 to $999,000.00 $5,604.00 $3642.60 $999,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $5,608.75 $3645.69 Attachment A - pg 12 of 12 page 31 To figure surcharge .0005 x valuation Valuation Permit Plan Fees I I Review page 32 2014 City of Mendota Heights Fee Schedule (Revised) Propoosed to the City Council on July 15, 2014 Resolution 2014 - 42 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FEESCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Building Alterations Residential/Commercial Per Attachment A Building Moving Permit $75 Building Permit Fee (inekiding-Ree€rag Residential/Commercial Per Attachment A Contractor License Annual Fence Permit Gas Fire Place Grading Permit Mechanical New Heating Mechanical New A/C Mechanical Alteration or Residential Replace Mechanical Alteration or Commercial Replace Mechanical Gas Piping Mining Permit Park Dedication Fee New Residential Lot Park Dedication Fee New Commercial Lot Plan Check Fee Residential/Commercial Plumbing Permit Fee Commercial Plumbing Alteration or Commercial Repair Plumbing Permit Fee Residential New Construction Plumbing Alteration or Residential Repair Plumbing Bath Addition Rough Residential $50/year $50/flat fee 1% of value/$100 minimum $100/flat fee 1% of value/$75 minimum 1% of value/$75 minimum 1% of value/$75 minimum 1% of value/$75 minimum 75 $350 $2,700 10% of assessed value Per Attachment A (65%) 1% of value/$75 minimum 1% of value/$75 minimum $75 plus $5/per fixture 1% of value/$75 minimum $75 plus $5/per fixture Page 2 of 3 page 33 Per Attachment A $75 Per Attachment A $50/year $25/flat fee N/A $100/flat fee I% of value/$50 minimum 1% of value/$50 minimum 1% of value/$25 minimum 1% of value/$50 minimum $50 $350 $2,700 10% of assessed value Per Attachment A (55%) 1% of value/$50 minimum I% of value/$50 minimum $50 plus $5/per fixture 1% of value/$25 minimum $25 plus $5/per fixture $5/fixture/$25 minimum CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS page 34 FEESCHEDULE BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE Plumbing Rough -In Separate from new $75 $25 construction Plumbing Water Heater Residential 1% of value/$75 minimum 1% of value/$25 minimum Replacement Public Right of Way Commercial $200 / first 1000 feet $200 / first 1000 feet Permit $25 / each additional 100 feet $25 / each additional 100 feet Public Right of Way Residential $50/flat fee $25/flat fee Permit Public Utility or Improved Public ROW Residential/Commercial parcels not Amount assessed at time of improvement plus Amount assessed at time of Connection assessed at time past City improvement interest at rate offered to other assessments at improvement plus interest at rate surrounding lots were assessed time of improvement offered to other assessments at time of improvement Roofing & SidingPermit Residential 1% of value/$100 minimum Per Attachment A Roofing Penn it Commercial 1% of value/$1 000 maximum Per Attachment A Sewer Permit Residential/Commercial 50 $25 Sign Permit Triple fee charged if sign is erected w/o Per Attachment A Per Attachment A permit, Per Code 12-1D-15 B. 2 Street Light Utility No charge No charge Charge Storm Sewer Utility Commercial/Industrial $ 121.80/acre $ 121.80/acre Charge Storm Sewer Utility Residential $7.25 $7.25 Charge Temporary Sign Permit $25 $25 Water Permit Residential/Commercial $10 $10 Window Replacement Residential 1% of value/$75 minimum Per Attachment A Page 3 of 3 page 35 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, 5g 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fD www.mendota-heights.com T CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Justin Miller, City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution Honoring Eunice Diedrich BACKGROUND During the Council Comments section of the July 1st City Council meeting, Councilmember Petschel noted that Mendota Heights resident Eunice Diedrich was about to celebrate her 100th birthday. The council expressed their desire to formally recognize Mrs. Diedrich at the next council meeting. Attached to this report is Resolution 2014-43, "A Resolution Honoring Mendota Heights Resident Eunice Diedrich on her 100th Birthday". BUDGETIMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION If council desires, a motion to approve the attached resolution would be in order. Approval of this action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 36 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014-43 A RESOLUTION HONORING MENDOTA HEIGHTS RESIDENT EUNICE DIEDRICH ON HER 100TH BIRTHDAY WHEREAS, Mendota Heights resident Eunice Diedrich was born on July 2, 1914; and WHEREAS, Eunice and her husband Leonard built their home on Hiawatha Avenue in 1932, where she raised six children and has lived ever since; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Diedrich recently celebrated her 100th birthday, marking a significant milestone for a Mendota Heights resident of over 80 years; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that Mrs. Eunice Diedrich be honored for her lifelong accomplishments and formally acknowledge her decades of residency in the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of July, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST Lorri Smith, City Clerk 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.rnendota-hei ghts.corn s � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor, and City Council FROM: Justin Miller, City Administrator Tamara Schutta, Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator SUBJECT: Personnel Action Items — Amended Report Item 1: Approval of Completion of Probationary Employment Period for Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator Tamara Schutta Effective July 1, 2014, Tamara Schutta successfully completed her one-year probationary period for her promotion to Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator. Over the past year, Ms. Schutta has been responsible for the Friday News and the City's Social Media accounts and contract management as well as continue to manage the city's human resources duties. Tamara Schutta's position is a Grade Level 29 in the City's position and pay classification plan. On July 1, 2014, Ms. Schutta will be at Grade Level 29, Step C with at a current annual salary of $70,887. City staff recommends that the City Council officially appoint Tamara Schutta to the position of regular, full-time Assistant to the City Administrator/HR Coordinator, effective July 1, 2014. Item 2: Par 3 Seasonal Staff City staff is seeking Council approval to hire a park helper for the Par 3. This position would assist in maintaining the landscape throughout the Par 3 grounds along with assisting with basic maintenance tasks (i.e. emptying trash bins, etc.). Staff is recommending Anthony Dupont for the Par 3 seasonal Park Helper position. Mr. Dupont's hourly rate for this position will be $8.50 per hour and he will be scheduled to work approximately 15 hours a week for the remainder of the 2014 golf season. Staff is recommending Anthony Dupont for employment effective July 16, 2014 for the 2014 golf season. Item 3: Public Works Staffing At a recent Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to post the vacancy within the Parks Division. The position was posted according to the Teamsters Labor Agreement. Public Works Director/City Engineer John Mazzitello, Public Works Superintendent Terry Blum and I interviewed Cliff Kirchner for the Park Maintenance position on Monday, July 14, 2014. It is our pleasure to recommend Cliff Kirchner for the Park Division Maintenance III position. Cliff's duties will include maintaining city parks, baseball, softball, and soccer fields, and ice skating and hockey rinks. The Park Division Maintenance III position wage is $27.53 per hour based on the 2014 — 2015 Teamsters Labor Agreement. Staff is also requesting Council approval of the revised position description and authorization to begin the recruitment process for the Mechanic position. Attached is a copy of an updated position description for your review. The Mechanic position wage is $28.75 per hour based on the 2014 — 2015 Teamsters Labor Agreement. City staff recommends that the City Council approve the appointment of Cliff Kirchner to the Park Division Maintenance III position and authorize staff to begin the recruitment process for the Mechanic position. Cliff's transfer to the Park Division Maintenance III position would be effective once a Mechanic has been hired. BUDGET IMPACT As noted above. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approves the actions requested above for these three items. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TITLE: Mechanic DRAFT Department: Accountable To: Class Code: Public Works Leads & Public Works Non-exempt/Union Superintendent Primary Location: Normal Hours: Date of Last Revision: Public Works 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 .m.* July 15, 2014 *Hours may vary based on business need. Job Purpose: To perform skilled mechanical work in the complete repair, maintenance and overhauling city -owned vehicles and light and heavy equipment. Essential Duties Performs partial or complete repair and maintenance of city -owned vehicles, trucks, tractors, sweepers and other light and heavy equipment in the Streets, Utility, Park, Engineering, Code Enforcement, Administration, Police and Fire Departments. Inspects equipment to determine type and scope of repairs needed, advisability of repairing, replacing, selling or trading the equipment. Greases and oils, services batteries, changes and repairs tires and tubes as necessary. Performs electrical welding. Recommends purchase of tools and parts as needed. Customizes City vehicles and equipment as needed. Maintains files on all city owned vehicles and engine -operating equipment to include service records and mileage boards to track oil changes, brake jobs, and tune-ups. Maintains parts and supplies necessary to maintain all vehicles and equipment; picks up supplies, vehicles and related services. Maintains a clean, orderly and safe work area. Performs maintenance on Public Works facility. Assist with street, park and utility duties as directed. May also be required to plow snow. Performs other duties as apparent or assigned. Minimum Qualifications A. High School Diploma or equivalent. B. Valid Minnesota Commercial Class B driver's license. C. Two years of Mechanic Related Vocational education, AAS degree or equivalent. D. Two years of experience as a heavy and light equipment mechanic. E. This position requires the ability to lift/carry/push/pull at least 25 — 50 lbs. on a regular basis. F. Ability to pass pre-employment physical, including drug testing. G. Must satisfactorily ass a criminal background check. Desired Qualifications A. ASE Auto or Truck Technician Certification. Knowledge/Skills/Abilities Required A. Knowledge of heavy equipment and automotive repair procedures and techniques. B. Knowledge of tools necessary for repairing and rebuilding equipment. C. Working knowledge of gas and arc welding. D. Knowledge of occupational safety precautions necessary to conduct assigned activities safely. E. Ability to operate electronic diagnostic and precision measuring instruments. F. Ability to repair electrical wiring on maintenance equipment. G. Ability to analyze repair and preventative maintenance issues, meet deadlines, and maintain orderly and accessible records. H. Ability to operate heavy and light maintenance equipment. I. Ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with city and county officials, other public agencies and the general public. J. Ability to work professionally with other employees and to deal with the public in a friendly and tactful manner. K. Ability to communicate ideas and explanations clearly in English, both orally and in writing. L. Ability to evaluate situations, improvise solutions with available resources and adapt to a changing environment. M. Ability to work with a minimal amount of supervision and complete assigned projects in a timely manner. N. Ability to work shift changes or on-call requirements. O. Ability to perform manual labor. P. Ability to work well under stress/pressure. Core Competencies by all City Employees: • Knowledge of work rules. Develops and maintains a thorough working knowledge of all city and applicable jurisdictional policies and procedures in order the help facilitate compliance with such policies and procedures by all staff members. • Develops respectful, cooperative and productive work relationships with coworkers, including the demonstrated willingness to help newer staff so their respective job responsibilities can be performed with confidence as quickly as possible. • Commitment to customer service. Demonstrates by personal example the service quality and integrity expected from all staff members. Represents Mendota Heights in a professional manner to the general public, employees and to other outside N contact/constituencies in a manner that helps maintain and enhance Mendota Heights' reputation as well managed and citizen oriented. • Communication. Confers regularly with and keep immediate Superintendent informed of all important matters pertaining to those functions and job responsibilities for which the employee is accountable. • Productivity and work organization. Demonstrate ability to plan, organize and accomplish work in a timely and efficient manner. • Problem solving and decision making. Exercise good judgment, analytical thinking, and independent thinking as it relates to departmental and city procedures, problems and policy interpretations. • Safety rules and procedures. Develop knowledge of and observe the safety policies and procedures of the city. Perform tasks in a safe and efficient manner while using appropriate safety equipment, clothing and devices. Safety Policy It is the responsibility of every employee of the City of Mendota Heights to know and observe the safety policies and procedures of the city. Each employee is expected to perform their tasks in a safe and efficient manner while using appropriate safety equipment, clothing and devices. Physical Activities/Requirements Overall Phvsical Strenath Demands Sedentary Exerting up to 10 lbs. occasionally or negligible weights frequently; sitting most of the time. Exerting up to 20 lbs. occasionally, 10 lbs. frequently, or negligible Light amounts constantly; Sitting most of the time. Frequently requires walking or standing. Medium Exerting 20 — 50 lbs. occasionally, 10 — 25 lbs. frequently, or up to 10 lbs. constantly. ✓ Heavy Exerting 50 — 100 lbs. occasionally, 25-50 lbs. frequently, or up to 10-20 lbs. constantly. Very Heavy Exerting over 100 lbs. occasionally, 50 — 100 lbs. frequently, or up to 20-50 lbs. constantly. 3 Physical Demands C = Continuously 2/3 or more of the time. F = Frequently From 1/3 to 2/3 of the time. O = Occasionally Up to 1/3 of the time. R = Rarely Less than 1 hour per week. N = Never Never Occurs Physical Demands Frequency Code Example Standing F Maintain vehicles. Sitting F Desk work, meetings, driving Walking F Around work site Lifting F Tools, equipment, files, supplies Carrying F Tools, equipment, files, supplies Pushing/Pulling C Tools, equipment, supplies Reaching C For tools, supplies and files Handling C Paperwork, tools, equipment Fine Dexterity C Vehicle maintenance, repairs and other equipment Kneeling F Vehicle maintenance, repairs and other equipment Crouching F Vehicle maintenance, repairs and other equipment Crawling F Under equipment Bending C Vehicle maintenance, repairs and other equipment Twisting F Vehicle maintenance, getting in and out of public works vehicle Climbing F Stairs, step stools, onto equipment Balancing F Ladders, equipment Vision C Vehicle maintenance & repairs, reading reports, Computer screen, driving, ability to see details at close range Hearing C Communicating with co-workers/public Talking C Communicating with the co-workers/public Foot Controls O Driving vehicle Other (specify) Machines, Tools, Equipment and Work Aids City vehicles, small equipment, tools, telephone, cell phone, fax machine, copier, calculator, computer, printer. Environmental Factors D = Daily W = Several M = Several R = Rarely S = N = Never times per times per month Seasonally week Health and Safety Environmental Factors Primary Work Location Mechanical Hazards Dirt and Dust Public Works Garage D D Dail Chemical Hazards Extreme Temperatures Vehicle !I D M Continuous) Electrical Hazards Noise and Vibration Outdoors D D Occasional) Fire Hazards Fumes and Oder Other W D Communicable Diseases Wetness/Humidity M S Physical Danger or abuse Darkness or poor lighting W S Other (specify): Work Schedule Possibilities ✓ Typical 40 hour work ✓ Work on Weekends week ✓ Work on Holidays ✓ On call/call out Vehicle and equipment repair and maintenance duties are performed in a well -lit, well ventilated and temperature controlled facility. Employees performing the duties of this job may work in outside weather conditions. Noise level in the work environment is usually moderate. It can be loud when operating equipment. Protective Equipment Required Situationally required — vest, safety glasses, face shield, steel -toed boots, hearing protection, gloves, hard hat, and other protective equipment as required. Non-physical Demands include Continuously Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never 2/3 or more of From 1/3 to 2/3 of up to 1/3 of the Less than 1 the time the time time hour per week Time Pressures — Occasionally Emergency Situations — Rarely Frequent Change of Tasks - Occasionally Irregular Work Schedule — Occasionally Performing Multiple Tasks Simultaneously - Frequently Working Closely with Others as Part of a Team — Continuously Noisy/Distracting Environment — Continuously Other: The above description is intended to describe the general functions, skills and knowledge of the person assigned to this job. These examples are intended only as illustrative of various types of work performed, and are not all inclusive. The employee may be required to perform other related duties as assigned. The job description is subject to change as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job change. page 38 Si. 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com T Ipp— If M CITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS Tj DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sloan Wallgren, Recreation Program Coordinator SUBJECT: Par 3 Update Update The golf course was closed for 2 1/2 days during the month of June versus 1/2a day last June due to the weather. The Junior Golf Camps and Junior Golf Leagues have been very busy so far this year. We should see a sizeable increase in the Recreation Programs line item. Staff has booked several group outings at the golf course for the month of July, and on July 31, 2014 we are hosting a Junior PGA event with 60 participants. The golf course will also be running specials with Groupon and Living Social in late July and early August. Maintenance Update The golf course was very wet during the month of June. We had the irrigation system turned off the entire month. With all of the rain that we had during June the area around the Wh hole was very wet, some days the hole was unplayable. Staff is looking into ways that we can fix this problem so that we can always have all 9 holes open. On June 21, 2014 Anthony Dupont and a local Boy Scout troop cleared out the flower beds and put down mulch. Budget Total sales for the month of June were $23,799 and total expenses were $20,267. Total sales for the year through June are $65,484 and expenses are $48,955 resulting in a net profit of $16,529 year to date. page 39 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PAR 3 BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT June 2014 (50% OF YEAR) REVENUES JUNE YTD YTD BUDGET 2014 2014 % GREENS, LEAGUE & TOURN FEES $105,000 $14,924 $32,349 30.81% RECREATION PROGRAMS $35,000 $5,552 $27,521 78.63% CONCESSIONS $21,000 $3,322 $5,612 26.73% SUNDRY REVENUE $100 $1 $1 1.00% INTEREST $250 $0 $0 0.00% CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS $0 $0 $0 0.00% PAR 3 FUND REVENUE TOTAL $161,350 $23,799 $65,484 40.58% EXPENDITURES JUNE YTD YTD BUDGET 2014 2014 % CLUBHOUSE SALARIES $32,700 $3,920 $4,959 15.16% ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES $24,021 $1,861 $11,860 49.37% FICA/PERA $8,844 $944 $2,334 26.39% MEDICAL INSURANCE $7,144 $490 $2,938 41.12% U/E & W/C INSURANCE $6,100 $13 $1,248 20.46% RENTALS $1,500 $583 $583 38.86% UTILITIES $9,800 $826 $3,223 32.88% PROFESSIONAL FEES - AUDIT $2,425 $1,124 $1,124 46.37% PROF FEES - CONSULTING FEES $900 $0 $1,520 168.86% PROF FEES - GROUNDS MGMT $8,000 $0 $3,000 37.50% PROF FEES - GROUNDS WAGES $18,000 $2,246 $4,106 22.81% PROF FEES - TREE MAINTENANCE $500 $0 $0 0.00% ADVERTISING/NEWSLETTER $600 $0 $205 34.23% LIABILITY/AUTO INSURANCE $3,450 $0 $2,961 85.81% OPERATING COSTS/SUPPLIES $7,200 $753 $770 10.69% FUEL $2,000 $275 $722 36.08% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE $15,000 $772 $2,606 17.37% SUNDRY/DUES/MILEAGE/CLOTHING $1,700 $700 $2,085 122.67% CONTINGENCY $0 $5,411 $1,760 0.00% ONLINE REG & CREDIT CARD FEES $2,750 $350 $953 0.00% PAR 3 EXPENDITURES TOTAL $152,634 $20,267 $48,955 32.07% 'CONTINGENCY YTD REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT RECEIVED FROM OUR INSURANCE COMPANY FOR CLUBHOUSE REPAIR OF WATER DAMAGE page 40 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PAR 3 BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT June 2013 AND 2014 REVENUES JUNE JUNE YTD YTD 2013 2014 2013 2014 GREENS, LEAGUE, TOURNAMENT FEES $19,649 $14,924 $33,839 $32,349 RECREATION PROGRAMS $7,838 $5,552 $25,812 $27,521 CONCESSIONS $4,153 $3,322 $6,161 $5,612 SUNDRY REVENUE $6 $1 $16 $1 INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 PAR 3 FUND REVENUE TOTAL $31,646 $23,799 $65,827 $65,484 EXPENDITURES CLUBHOUSE SALARIES $4,744 $3,920 $5,998 $4,959 ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES $1,735 $1,861 $11,138 $11,860 FICA/PERA $916 $944 $2,443 $2,334 MEDICAL INSURANCE $443 $490 $2,657 $2,938 U/E & W/C INSURANCE $0 $13 $3,297 $1,248 RENTALS $0 $583 $1,100 $583 UTILITIES $430 $826 $2,225 $3,223 PROFESSIONAL FEES -AUDIT $2,023 $1,124 $2,023 $1,124 PROF FEES -CONSULTING FEES $275 $0 $300 $1,520 PROF FEES -GROUNDS MGMT $0 $0 $0 $3,000 PROF FEES -GROUNDS WAGES $1,932 $2,246 $2,387 $4,106 PROF -FEES -TREE MAINTENANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 ADVERTISING/NEWSLETTER $0 $0 $196 $205 LIABILITY/AUTO INSURANCE ($76) $0 $3,012 $2,961 OPERATING COSTS/SUPPLIES $618 $753 $908 $770 FUEL $352 $275 $584 $722 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE $2,533 $772 $6,656 $2,606 SUNDRY/DUES/MILEAGE/CLOTHING $186 $700 $1,545 $2,085 CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $0 $0 ONLINE REG & CREDIT CARD FEES $402 $350 $769 $953 CONTINGENCY $0 $5,411 $0 $1,760 PAR 3 EXPENDITUES TOTAL $16,513 $20,267 $47,238 $48,955 page 41 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 651,4523850 phone 1 651 452,8940 fax www.mendota-heights,corn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director v� SUBJECT: Claims List Summary BACKGROUND Significant Claims Xcel Energy — Utilities $ 5,914.25 Bond Trust Services Corp — Bond Issue Payments $ 234,174.38 CDW Government — Computer Hardware $ 5,278.82 Knox Company — Operating Supplies — Fire Dept $ 5,945.00 Mendakota Country Club — Fireworks Contribution $ 4,000.00 Stantec Consulting Services — Planning Services $ 2,632.74 City of West St Paul — Sewer Agreement $ 2,906.45 Manual Checks Total $ 49,718.96 System Checks Total $ 286,256.96 Total for the list of claims for the July 15, 2014 city council meeting $ 335,975.92 RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the list of claims for July 15, 2014. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Claims List MANUAL CHECKS 07/09/14 MAN page 42 07/10/14 10:25 AM Page 1 Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF G 45-1155 CREDIT CARD TRANSFER $7,500.00 G 78-1155 CREDIT CARD TRANSFER $2,500.00 G 15-1155 CREDIT CARD TRANSFER $2,500.00 G 01-1155 CREDIT CARD TRANSFER $25,000.00 Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF $37,500.00 $37,500.00 page 43 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:17 AM Page 1 Claims List MANUALCHECKS 06/30/14 MAN Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF E 01-4435-200-70 PARK CELEBRATION EXPENSE Parks & Recreation $800.00 Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF $800.00 $800.00 page 44 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:24 AM Page 1 Claims List MANUALCHECKS 07/10/14 MAN Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name HINZE, SHARON E 15-4318-060-60 2ND QTR UTIL. BILLING POSTAGE Utility Enterprise $128.56 Search Name HINZE, SHARON $128.56 Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457 G 01-2072 07/03/2014 PAYROLL $483.99 G 01-2073 07/03/2014 PAYROLL $192.00 Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457 $675.99 Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION G 01-2072 07/03/2014 PAYROLL $50.00 Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION $50.00 Search Name SELECT ACCOUNT E 01-4131-110-10 JULY 2014 HSA CONTRIBUTIONS Administration $330.78 E 01-4131-020-20 JULY 2014 HSA CONTRIBUTIONS Police $507.72 E 05-4131-105-15 JULY 2014 HSA CONTRIBUTIONS Engineering Enterprise $253.86 G 01-2071 JULY 2014 HSA CONTRIBUTIONS $2,487.74 E 01-4131-070-70 JULY 2014 HSA CONTRIBUTIONS Parks & Recreation $253.86 Search Name SELECT ACCOUNT $3,833.96 Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL G 01-2070 07/03/2014 PAYROLL $47.89 Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL $47.89 Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE E 15-4318-060-60 2ND QTR UTIL. BILLING POSTAGE Utility Enterprise $768.31 Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE $768.31 Search Name XCEL ENERGY E 15-4211-400-60 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Utility Enterprise $725.19 E 01-4211-320-70 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Parks & Recreation $105.95 E 01-4211-300-50 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Road & Bridges $1,680.17 E 01-4211-310-50 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Road & Bridges $239.02 E 01-4211-310-70 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Parks & Recreation $239.02 E 01-4211-315-30 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Fire $479.96 E 01-4211-420-50 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Road & Bridges $149.07 E 15-4211-310-60 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Utility Enterprise $239.01 E 28-4211-000-00 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Spec Fds $182.21 E 01-4212-310-50 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Road & Bridges -$4.41 E 01-4212-310-70 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Parks & Recreation -$4.41 E 01-4212-315-30 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Fire $147.57 E 01-4212-320-70 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Parks & Recreation $25.05 E 08-4212-000-00 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Spec Fds $178.38 E 15-4212-310-60 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Utility Enterprise -$4.40 E 15-4212-400-60 MAY 2014 GAS UTILITIES Utility Enterprise $27.44 E 08-4211-000-00 MAY 2014 EL. UTILITIES Spec Fds $1,509.43 Search Name XCEL ENERGY $5,914.25 $11,418.96 page 45 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM Page 1 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name ALL CITY ELEVATOR, INC. E 08-4335-000-00 JULY 2014 ELEVATOR CONTRACT - CITY HALL Spec Fds $153.00 Search Name ALL CITY ELEVATOR, INC. $153.00 Search Name ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING E 01-4300-050-50 BUSINESS CARDS - T. BLUM Road & Bridges $22.35 E 01-4300-070-70 BUSINESS CARDS - T. BLUM Parks & Recreation $22.35 E 15-4300-060-60 BUSINESS CARDS - T. BLUM Utility Enterprise $22.34 Search Name ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING $67.04 Search Name AMERICAN FLEET" SUPPLY E 01-4330-490-50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - STREETS Road & Bridges $22.97 Search Name AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY $22.97 Search Name AMERIPRIDE SERVICES E 45-4335-045-45 MAT SERVICE - PAR 3 Golf Course $31.37 E 45-4335-045-45 MAT SERVICE - PAR 3 Golf Course $31.37 E 15-4335-310-60 MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE Utility Enterprise $25.89 E 01-4335-310-50 MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE Road & Bridges $25.90 E 01-4335-310-50 MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE Road & Bridges $25.90 Search Name AMERIPRIDE SERVICES $140.43 Search Name APACHE GROUP E 01-4305-030-30 SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $63.05 E 08-4335-000-00 SUPPLIES - CITY HALL Spec Fds $49.94 E 01-4305-050-50 SUPPLIES - PW Road & Bridges $436.32 Search Name APACHE GROUP $549.31 Search Name ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY E 01-4305-070-70 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS Parks & Recreation $923.04 Search Name ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY $923.04 Search Name ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS E 01-4132-031-30 JULY 2014 LTD PREMIUM Fire $185.50 Search Name ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $185.50 Search Name ATOM E 01-4400-020-20 TRAINING - E. PETERSEN Police $850.00 Search Name ATOM $850.00 Search Name AWES SEIDEL DIVERSIFIED INSUR E 01-4132-031-30 ACCIDENT/HEALTH POLICY - FIRE DEPT Fire $728.00 Search Name AWES SEIDEL DIVERSIFIED INSUR $728.00 Search Name BCA -CJ IS E 01-4223-020-20 CJDN CHARGE - 2ND QTR 2014 Police $720.00 Search Name BCA -CJ IS $720.00 Search Name BLUE TARP FINANCIAL E 15-4330-490-60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - SEWER Utility Enterprise $45.96 Search Name BLUE TARP FINANCIAL $45.96 Search Name BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP E 65-4226-000-00 2008 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 75-4456-000-00 2012 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $29,355.00 Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP E 01-4220-110-10 07/01/2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Administration $95.60 page 46 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM E 01-4410-020-20 UNIFORMS CLEANING - PD Page 2 $108.90 Search Name CAMELOT CLEANERS Claims List $108.90 Search Name CAMPION, CHARLES SYSTEM CHECKS E 78-4460-774-00 HUNTER/ORCHARD PROJECT REPAIRS Spec Fds $1,053.74 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount E 46-4226-000-00 2011 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $225.00 E 67-4226-000-00 2009 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $225.00 E 77-4226-000-00 2013 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 72-4226-000-00 2011 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $225.00 E 12-4226-000-00 2009 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $225.00 E 70-4226-000-00 2010 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 58-4226-761-00 2006 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 60-4226-000-00 2007 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 77-4456-000-00 2013 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $34,912.50 E 65-4456-000-00 2008 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $51,376.25 E 58-4456-761-00 2006 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $4,255.00 E 12-4456-000-00 2009 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $4,340.00 E 47-4456-000-00 2007 PAR 3 BONDS Spec Fds $38,565.00 E 75-4226-000-00 2012 AGENT FEES Spec Fds $450.00 E 70-4456-777-00 2010 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $12,671.88 E 60-4456-000-00 2007 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $22,528.75 E 72-4456-000-00 2011 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $17,397.50 E 46-4456-000-00 2011 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $11,933.75 E 67-4456-000-00 2009 BOND ISSUE Spec Fds $3,238.75 Search Name BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP $234,174.38 Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP E 01-4220-110-10 07/01/2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Administration $95.60 Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP $95.60 Search Name CAMELOT CLEANERS E 01-4410-020-20 UNIFORMS CLEANING - PD Police $108.90 Search Name CAMELOT CLEANERS $108.90 Search Name CAMPION, CHARLES E 78-4460-774-00 HUNTER/ORCHARD PROJECT REPAIRS Spec Fds $1,053.74 Search Name CAMPION, CHARLES $1,053.74 Search Name CDW GOVERNMENT, INC E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT - PD Police $4,108.00 E 01-4330-440-20 COMP. HARDWARE - PD Police -$162.41 E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT - SQUAD BUILD Police $1,200.00 E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT - SQUAD BUILD Police $133.23 Search Name CDW GOVERNMENT, INC $5,278.82 Search Name CENTRAL IRRIGATION SUPPLY E 01-4330-215-70 HERBICIDE - PARKS Parks & Recreation $322.52 Search Name CENTRAL IRRIGATION SUPPLY $322.52 Search Name COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS E 45-4310-210-45 CONCESSIONS - PAR3 Golf Course $256.08 Search Name COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS $256.08 Search Name COMMERCIAL ASPHALT E 01-4422-050-50 ASPHALT MIX Road & Bridges $338.40 Search Name COMMERCIAL ASPHALT $338.40 Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC E 01-4211-420-50 4TH QTR 2013 UTILITIES Road & Bridges $263.57 E 01-4211-420-50 IST QTR 2014 UTILITIES Road & Bridges $179.80 page 47 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM Page 3 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC $443.37 Search Name EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC E 01-4420-050-50 STREETS SIGNS - PARTS Road & Bridges $115.20 Search Name EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC $115.20 Search Name ECKBERG LAMMERS E 01-4220-120-40 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES Code Enforcement/Inspe $75.00 E 01-4220-120-10 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES Administration $270.00 E 01-4221-120-10 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES - COUNCIL MTGS Administration $400.00 E 01-4220-120-20 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES Police $150.00 G 27-1145 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES $225.00 E 01-4220-120-80 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES Planning $637.50 Search Name ECKBERG LAMMERS $1,757.50 Search Name EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNC E 01-4330-460-30 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - FIRE DEPT Fire $305.00 Search Name EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNC $305.00 Search Name EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT INSTALL - PD Police $255.00 Search Name EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOG $255.00 Search Name EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT PARTS - PD Police $84.04 Search Name EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC $84.04 Search Name FASTSIGNS E 01-4335-315-30 PARKING SIGNS - FIRE HALL Fire $351.00 Search Name FASTSIGNS $351.00 Search Name FERRELLGAS E 01-4422-050-50 STREET MAINT. SUPPLIES Road & Bridges $273.78 Search Name FERRELLGAS $273.78 Search Name FIRECOM E 01-4330-460-30 EQUIPMENT - FIRE DEPT Fire $593.49 Search Name FIRECOM $593.49 Search Name GAMEfIME E 01-4330-215-70 PLAYGROUND REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $254.30 Search Name GAMETIME $254.30 Search Name GERTENS GREENHOUSE E 78-4460-774-00 HUNTER/ORCHARD PROJECT REPAIRS Spec Fds $33.59 Search Name GERTENS GREENHOUSE $33.59 Search Name GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, INC. E 01-4305-050-50 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PW Road & Bridges $164.15 E 01-4305-070-70 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PW Parks & Recreation $164.15 E 15-4305-060-60 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PW Utility Enterprise $164.14 Search Name GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, INC. $492.44 Search Name GOLDCOM E 01-4305-030-30 OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $20.16 page 48 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM Page 4 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name GOLDCOM $20.16 Search Name GOPHER STATE ONE CALL E 01-4210-040-40 JUNE 2014 SERVICE Code Enforcement/Inspe $512.65 Search Name GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $512.65 Search Name GRAINGER E 08-4335-000-00 BLDG MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL Spec Fds $29.16 Search Name GRAINGER $29.16 Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A. E 01-4222-120-20 JUNE 2014 LEGAL SERVICES Police $5,356.00 Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A. $5,356.00 Search Name HIRSHFIELD S PAINT & MFG INC E 01-4330-215-70 FIELD STRIPING PAINT Parks & Recreation $912.00 Search Name HIRSHFIELD S PAINT & MFG INC $912.00 Search Name INFORMATION POLICY ANALYSIS E 01-4400-020-20 WORKSHOP - L. BRANDT Police $175.00 Search Name INFORMATION POLICY ANALYSIS $175.00 Search Name INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS E 05-4300-105-15 OFFICE SUPPLIES - ENG. Engineering Enterprise $15.92 E 01-4300-110-10 SUPPLIES - ADMIN Administration $28.66 Search Name INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $44.58 Search Name INVER GROVE FORD E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - PD Police $158.88 E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - CORE RETURN Police -$70.00 E 01-4330-440-20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - PD Police $50.00 Search Name INVER GROVE FORD $138.88 Search Name IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT E 01-4490-110-10 JUNE 2014 SHREDDING Administration $11.38 E 01-4490-020-20 JUNE 2014 SHREDDING Police $34.14 Search Name IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT $45.52 Search Name JANI-KING OF MINNESOTA, INC. E 01-4335-310-50 JULY 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Road & Bridges $66.67 E 08-4335-000-00 CLEANING -PD Spec Fds $350.00 E 01-4335-310-70 JULY 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Parks & Recreation $66.67 E 01-4335-315-30 JULY 2014 SERVICE - FIRE DEPT Fire $200.00 E 15-4335-310-60 JULY 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Utility Enterprise $66.66 Search Name JANI-KING OF MINNESOTA, INC. $750.00 Search Name KNOX COMPANY E 01-4305-030-30 LOCK BOXES - FIRE DEPT Fire $5,945.00 Search Name KNOX COMPANY $5,945.00 Search Name LEXISNEXIS E 01-4223-020-20 JUNE 2014 SERVICE Police $50.00 Search Name LEXISNEXIS $50.00 Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS E 01-4240-110-10 NOTICE - LIQUOR LICENSES Administration $31.50 page 49 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM Page 5 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount E 01-4240-080-80 NOTICES - PLANNING CASES Planning $56.00 Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS $87.50 Search Name M T I DISTRIBUTING COMPANY E 01-4330-490-70 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - PARKS E 01-4330-490-70 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - PARKS Search Name M T I DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Search Name MENARDS E 15-4305-060-60 E 15-4305-060-60 E 01-4336-050-50 E 01-4336-050-50 E 01-4330-490-50 E 08-4335-000-00 E 29-4337-000-00 Search Name MENARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES - SEWER OPERATING SUPPLIES - SEWER PLOW DAMAGE REPAIRS PLOW DAMAGE REPAIRS EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES - STREETS CLEANING SUPPLIES - CITY HALL STORM SEWER MAINT. SUPPLIES Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation Utility Enterprise Utility Enterprise Road & Bridges Road & Bridges Road & Bridges Spec Fds Spec Fds Search Name MENDAKOTA COUNTRY CLUB E 01-4490-109-09 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS City Council Search Name MENDAKOTA COUNTRY CLUB Search Name MENDEZ, JOHN E 01-4400-030-30 TRAVEL EXP. REIMBURSEMENT - J. MENDEZ Fire Search Name MENDEZ, JOHN $223.48 $143.04 $366.52 $23.97 $31.97 $51.91 -$4.95 $7.99 $19.76 $33.47 $164.12 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $33.02 $33.02 Search Name METRO AREA MGMT ASSOCIATION E 01-4400-110-10 SEMINAR - J, MILLER Administration $20.00 Search Name METRO AREA MGMT ASSOCIATION $20.00 Search Name METRO SALES E 01-4330-030-30 QUARTERLY COPIER MAINT. - FIRE DEPT Fire $107.07 Search Name METRO SALES $107.07 Search Name MIKES SHOE REPAIR INC E 01-4305-155-30 PROTECTIVE GEAR REPAIR - FIRE DEPT Fire $69.00 Search Name MIKES SHOE REPAIR INC $69.00 Search Name MN CONWAY E 01-4335-315-30 SPRINKLER INSPECTION - FIRE DEPT Fire $109.00 E 01-4220-020-20 FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP. - PD Police $132.50 E 01-4335-315-30 FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP. - FIRE DEPT Fire $514.50 Search Name MN CONWAY $756.00 Search Name MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION E 01-4403-030-30 HAZMAT CERT. - D. OBER Fire $150.00 Search Name MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION $150.00 Search Name MN ST ADMIN ITG TELECOM SRVCE E 01-4223-020-20 JUNE 2014 WAN SERVICE Police $125.81 E 01-4220-133-10 JUNE 2014 WAN SERVICE Administration $111.00 Search Name MN ST ADMIN ITG TELECOM SRVCE $236.81 Search Name MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 G 01-2075 JUNE 2014 UNION DUES $561.00 page 50 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/1410:30 AM Page 6 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount Search Name MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 $561.00 Search Name MPELRA E 01-4400-110-10 CONF. REGISTRATION - T. SCHUTTA Administration $235.00 Search Name MPELRA $235.00 Search Name NITiI SANITATION INC E 45-4280-045-45 RUBBISH REMOVAL & RECYCLING Golf Course $66.23 Search Name NI TI SANITATION INC $66.23 Search Name OREILLY AUTO/FIRST CALL E 01-4330-490-50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - STREETS Road & Bridges $41.94 E 01-4620-070-70 NEW PARKS TRUCK EQUIPMENT Parks & Recreation $78.90 Search Name OREILLY AUTO/FIRST CALL $120.84 Search Name OXYGEN SERVICE CO E 01-4200-610-50 CYLINDER RENT - PW Road & Bridges $26.00 E 01-4305-030-30 OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $103.74 E 01-4200-610-70 CYLINDER RENT - PW Parks & Recreation $26.00 E 15-4200-610-60 CYLINDER RENT - PW Utility Enterprise $26.00 Search Name OXYGEN SERVICE CO $181.74 Search Name SECURITY RESPONSE SERVICES INC E 45-4335-045-45 SECURUTY MONITORING - PAR3 Golf Course $93.04 Search Name SECURITY RESPONSE SERVICES INC $93.04 Search Name SOUTH ST. PAUL UMPIRES ASSN E 01-4435-200-70 JUNE 2014 UMPIRE SERVICES Parks & Recreation $1,848.00 Search Name SOUTH ST. PAUL UMPIRES ASSN $1,848.00 Search Name STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES E 01-4220-135-80 PLANNING ASSISTANCE Planning $777.74 E 01-4220-135-80 PLANNING ASSISTANCE - ESCROW Planning $1,855.00 Search Name STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES $2,632.74 Search Name STEIN, DALE E 01-4403-030-30 SUPPLIESD - FF TESTING Fire $81.66 Search Name STEIN, DALE $81.66 Search Name STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC E 01-4620-070-70 NEW TRUCK EQUIPMENT - PARKS Parks & Recreation $269.50 Search Name STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC $269.50 Search Name SUNFLOWER MARKETING E 01-4435-200-70 T-SHIRTS - TENNIS LESSONS Parks & Recreation $1,342.48 Search Name SUNFLOWER MARKETING $1,342.48 Search Name TRIANGLE RUBBISH & RECYCLING E 01-4280-315-30 MAY 2014 SERVICE Fire $53.10 Search Name TRIANGLE RUBBISH & RECYCLING $53.10 Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH E 01-4220-050-50 TESTING - PW Road & Bridges $55.00 Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH $55.00 Search Name TWIN CITY CONTAINER page 51 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 07/10/14 10:30 AM Page 7 Claims List SYSTEM CHECKS 07/15/14 PAY Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount E 01-4305-070-70 OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS Parks & Recreation $176.00 Search Name TWIN CITY CONTAINER $176.00 Search Name VERIZON WIRELESS E 01-4210-030-30 JUNE -JULY 2014 SERVICE Fire $155.78 Search Name VERIZON WIRELESS $155.78 Search Name VITO MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS E 08-4335-000-00 HVAC REPAIRS - CITY HALL Spec Fds $212.00 Search Name VITO MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS $212.00 Search Name WALLGREN, SLOAN E 01-4400-070-70 TUITION REIMB. - S. WALLGREN Parks & Recreation $1,985.54 Search Name WALLGREN, SLOAN $1,985.54 Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT E 01-4280-310-50 JUNE 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Road & Bridges $221.00 E 01-4280-310-70 JUNE 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Parks & Recreation $221.00 E 15-4280-310-60 JUNE 2014 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Utility Enterprise $221.00 E 08-4280-000-00 JUNE 2014 SERVICE - CITY HALL Spec Fds $183.66 Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT $846.66 Search Name WEST ST. PAUL, CITY OF E 15-4490-060-60 2013 DELAWARE AVE SEWER Utility Enterprise $2,906.45 Search Name WEST ST. PAUL, CITY OF $2,906.45 Search Name WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE E 01-4330-490-70 TIRES - PARKS Parks & Recreation $758.56 Search Name WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE $758.56 Search Name YALE MECHANICAL E 01-4335-315-30 BLDG CONTRACT MAINTENANCE - FIRE HALL Fire $734.25 Search Name YALE MECHANICAL $734.25 2014 licensing list for City Council Type Contractor Name Asphalt Excavating General HVAC Sign Blacktop Concepts, Inc Gartzke Construction, Inc Genadek Landscaping & Excavating Jacon, LLC Voson Plumbing SAC Wireless G -HVAC, LLC KB Service Company Midland Heating & Air Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc page 52 Sk. Thursday, July 10, 2014 Page 1 of I DATE 10 -Jul -14 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Mike Andrejka- Building Official SUBJECT: Building Activity Report June 2014 June 1 2014 thru June 30 2014 June 1 2014 thru June 30 2014 No. Valuation Fee Collected Building No. Valuation Fee Collected Permits Permits No. Valuation SFD 2 $925,000.00 $ 9,307.75 APT $ $ $ Townhouse $ $ $ Condo 3 $ $ Misc. 81 $ 686,649.86 1 $ 13,326.25 C/I 7 $ 5,518,734.00 $ 39,137.83 Sub Total: 90 $7,130,383.86 $ 61,771.83 June 1 2014 thru June 30 2014 June 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 No. Valuation Fee Collected Trade 18 $ 1 $ 900.00 Fee Collected Permits Fee Collected Permits No. Valuation $2,865,000.00 Fee Collected Plumbing 21 $ $ 2,439.20 Water 1 $ $ 10.00 Sewer 3 $ $ 75.00 Heat, AC & Gas 36 $ $ 3,963.70 Sub Tota -1-7-61 Sub Total: 1 266 $14,332,776.07 $ 6,487.90 June 1 2014 thru June 30 2014 Licenses No. Valuation Fee Collected Contractor Licenses 18 $ 1 $ 900.00 Janua 1 2014 thru June 30 2014 Building No. Valuation Fee Collected Permits Fee Collected Plumbing 71 $ $ SFD 6 $2,865,000.00 $ $ $28,585.87 APT $ $ Heat, AC & Gas 123 Townhouse $ $ $ 1 $ Condo $ $ $ Misc. 1 238 $ 3,298,731.07 $ 56,439.61 C/1 22 $ 8,169,045.00 $ 68,976.52 Sub Total: 1 266 $14,332,776.07 $ $154,002.00 January 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Trade Building No. Permits No. Valuation Fee Collected Plumbing 71 $ $ 6,134.40 Water 3 $ $ 30.00 Sewer 7 $ 1,059,000.00 $175.00 Heat, AC & Gas 123 $ $ 12,087.10 Sub Total: 1 204 $ 1 $ 18,421.50 January 1 2013 thru June 30 2013 Building No. Valuation Fee Collected Fee Collected Permits No. Valuation SFD 1 Fee Collected SFD 3 $ 1,059,000.00 $ 11,176.11 APT $ $ $ Sewer Townhouse $ $ $ Heat, AC & Gas Condo I 3,918,593.00 $ $ Sub Total 1 Misc. 1 243 $ 3,027,537.00 $ 52,935.71 C/I 1 51 $ 10,382,535.00 $ 74,991.89 Sub Total: 1 297 $ 14,469,072.00 $ 139,103.71 January 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Trade Valuation Fee Collected Permits Permits No. No. Valuation SFD 1 Fee Collected Plumbing 98 $ $ 6,101.00 Water 1 $ $ 10.00 Sewer 2 $ $ 50.00 Heat, AC & Gas 154 3,918,593.00 $ 17,933.62 Sub Total 1 255 $ $ 24,094.62 51. J nuary 1 2012 thru June 30 2012 Building No. Valuation Fee Collected Permits Permits No. SFD 1 Fee Collected $704,000.00 $6,514.00 APT $ 8,281.00 $ Townhouse $ $ Condo $ $ $ Misc. 1 24811 Heat, AC & Gas 3,918,593.00 $ 49,302.62 C/I 1 77 $ 14,383,540.00 $ 101,272.78 Sub Total: 1 326 1 $ $19,006,133.00 $157,089.66 January 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Trade Permits No. Valuation Fee Collected Plumbing 101 $ $ 8,281.00 Water $ Sewer 8 $ $ 200.00 Heat, AC & Gas 131 $ $ 17,738.00 Sub Total: 1 240 $ 1 $ 26,219.00 January1 2014 thru June 30 2014 anuary 1 2013 thru June 30 2013 J nuarV 1 2012 thru June 30 2012 Licenses I No. Valuation Fee Collected Licenses No. Valuation Fee Collected Licenses No. Valuation Fee Collected Contractor Contractor Contractor Licenses 1 237 $ 1 $ 11,850.00 Licenses 271 $ 1 $ 13,550.00 Licenses 1 238 $ $ 11,900.00 TOTAL 1 1691 $7,130,383.861 $ 69,159.73 1 ITOTAL 1 707 $14,332,776.07 1 $184,273.50 1 ITOTAL 1 823 $ 14,469,072.00 1 $ 176,748.33 TOTAL 1 804 $19,006,133.00 1 $195,208.66 NOTE: All fee amounts exclude SAC, WAC, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. page 53 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, b 7a• 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 www.rrendota-heights.com T CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Denying Front and Side Yard Setback Variance Requests BACKGROUND The applicants are requesting variances from the front and side yard setback standards to construct an addition to their single-family residential dwelling at 1704 Vicki Lane. The proposed addition would enlarge the existing two -car attached garage with another stall, add a mudroom and small studio, and remodel the kitchen. However, the proposed improvements encroach into the required front and side yards and necessitate variances from both standards. While portions of the proposed addition encroach into different required yards, Staff recommended the Planning Commission consider the variance requests together since the entire addition is being considered as one project. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at the June 24 meeting. There were no public comments. BUDGETIMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended denial of the variance requests, as described in Planning Case 2014-17. If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting RESOLUTION 2014-39 DENYING FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES. This matter requires a simple majority vote. page 54 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014-39 RESOLUTION DENYING FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES WHEREAS, Ned Rukavina and Leslie Pilgrim have applied for variances from the front and side yard setback standards in order to construct an addition to their single-family dwelling at 1704 Vicki Lane (PID#: 27-76400-01-250, TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, PT OF LOT 24 BLK 1 LYING E OF W LINE L 35 EXT S TO VICKI LANE AND ALL OF LOT 25, BLOCK 1) as proposed in Planning Case 2014-17; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting on June 24, 2014. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the front and side yard setback variance requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby denied with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed dwelling and garage addition's encroachment into the required front and side yard setbacks is inconsistent with the intent of the Code to promote green space, preserve adequate drainage and utility easement corridors, and allow for adequate buffering between structures. 2. An addition to accommodate another garage stall may be accomplished without the need for a setback variance. 3. While inconvenient or less desirable, an addition to expand the existing dwelling could be accomplished by expanding other portions of the dwelling without the need for a variance. 4. The proposed encroachments into the required setback areas constitute an unreasonable use of the setback area and will substantially increase the footprint of the structure towards the street, both of which are out of character for the neighborhood. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this fifteenth day of July, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 55 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014-39 (ALTERNATE) RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES WHEREAS, Ned Rukavina and Leslie Pilgrim have applied for variances from the front and side yard setback standards in order to construct an addition to their single-family dwelling at 1704 Vicki Lane (PID#: 27-76400-01-250, TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, PT OF LOT 24 BLK 1 LYING E OF W LINE L 35 EXT S TO VICKI LANE AND ALL OF LOT 25, BLOCK 1) as proposed in Planning Case 2014-17; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting on June 24, 2014. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the front and side yard setback variance requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed addition is a reasonable use of the subject property. 2. The proposed garage expansion is minimal and will only encroach 18 -square feet into the required side yard to provide for three vehicle stalls and will be offset by areas of the garage in which the setback is greater relative to the side property line. 3. The proposed addition cannot be accommodated within the required front and side yard setbacks due to the existing location of the dwelling on the irregularly shaped lot with cul-de-sac frontage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the front and side yard setback variance requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. A building permit be obtained prior to construction of the addition. 2. The proposed driveway expansion is revised to be compliant with the side yard setback requirements or an additional variance is obtained to construct it as proposed 3. The applicant shall submit grading plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 4. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this fifteenth day of July, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 56 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com , CITY OF MENDIDTA HEIGHTS DATE: June 24, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-17 Front and Side Yard Setback Variance Requests APPLICANT: Ned Rukavina and Leslie Pilgrim PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1704 Vicki Lane ZONING/GUIDED: R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential ACTION DEADLINE: August 3, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicants are seeking variances from the front and side yard setback standards to construct an addition to their single-family residential dwelling at 1704 Vicki Lane. BACKGROUND The subject parcel is 0.48 acres (21,104 square feet) and contains an existing single-family residential dwelling with an attached two -car garage. In addition, it is zoned R-1 One Family Residential and guided for low density residential development. The applicants intend to construct an addition to enlarge the garage with an additional stall, add a mudroom and small studio, and remodel the kitchen. The proposed addition encroaches into the required front and side yards and necessitates variances from both standards. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The subject parcel is guided LR Low Density Residential in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's request to construct an addition is consistent with the continued use as a single-family residential dwelling. Setback Variance Requests The existing dwelling, including the attached garage, are within the required 30 -foot front yard and 10 -foot side yard setbacks for the R-1 District. As shown in the attached Site Plan, the proposed addition would encroach 11 feet, at its greatest dimension, into the required front yard and totals 204 square feet. The addition would also encroach 5 feet, at its greatest dimension, into the required side yard and totals 18 square feet. In total, the proposed addition would encroach approximately 222 square feet into the required setback areas. The proposed addition would extend the western portion of the existing structure 15 feet closer to the street and would match a similar, existing extension on the eastern portion of the dwelling. The subject parcel is page 57 located on a cul-de-sac which causes a curvilinear front yard setback line. According to the applicants, the existing location of the dwelling, on the nearly half -acre, pie -shaped subject parcel, makes square structures difficult to fit. Title 12-IE-I(B)(4) of the City Code requires that driveways in single-family residential zoning districts be a minimum of 5 feet from side lot lines and no greater than 25 feet wide at the property line. The Site Plan indicates an expanded driveway would be located within 2 feet of the side lot line. To the extent that an alternate design cannot be accomplished in compliance with the Code requirements, the applicants would be required to apply for another variance to construct the driveway as proposed. When considering variances for the proposed addition, the City is required to find that: 1. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. An expansion of the existing single-family dwelling and attached garage is a reasonable use of the property and compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. The existing attached garage is approximately 400 square feet and, based on the preliminary architectural drawing submitted as part of the application, the additional garage stall and square footage appears to meet the permitted 1,200 -square foot standard for attached private garages in residential zoning districts. However, side yard setbacks for structures are intended to ensure that green space exists between properties to accommodate drainage and utility easements along property boundary lines and provide adequate buffering between structures. The proposed expansion of the structure to accommodate an additional garage stall will leave approximately 5 feet between the new wall and the property line at the farthest dimension of the encroachment. In addition, front yard setbacks for structures are intended to promote a uniform frontage along the street and allow adequate space between the right-of-way and property boundary lines for utilities or future improvements. The proposed expansion would encroach as much as I I feet into the required front yard, leaving just under 20 feet in certain areas between the structure and right-of-way. 2. The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the property which are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations; The existing location of the dwelling on the subject parcel only creates a practical difficulty in expanding the structure in the manner as proposed by the applicants. It appears that an expansion of the garage and other portions of the existing dwelling into the side and rear yards could be accomplished without encroaching into the required setbacks (see Exhibit 1). However, based on the existing layout of the house, expansions in these areas may not fit the applicant's needs and/or desires. The Code allows encroachments for covered/enclosed entryways, including porches, decks, stoops, or similar structures, into the required front yard under certain conditions. Based on the proposed improvements within the front yard encroachment, consisting of a mud room, studio, and remodeled kitchen, it is unlikely that any would be eligible under this Code provision. Nevertheless, the applicants can pursue expansion of the existing dwelling into the required front yard in compliance with this Code provision which would not require a variance. 3. The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Vicki Lane cul-de-sac neighborhood, which contains 10 single-family residential dwellings, does not have any three -car garages. According to the applicants, they intend to make the addition fit in with the existing dwelling and the additional garage stall will eliminate a parked car in the driveway, improving the look of the neighborhood. However, the proposed addition and associated encroachments will eliminate a page 58 significant portion of the existing driveway and substantially increase the footprint of the structure towards the street. Based on an analysis of aerial photos of the neighborhood, it appears that all existing dwellings in the neighborhood meet or exceed the R-1 District's 30 -foot front yard setback (see Exhibit 2). For that reason, Staff's believes the proposed addition is out of character for the neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the variance requests for construction of the proposed addition within the required front and side yard setbacks. While portions of the proposed addition encroach into different required yards, Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider the variance requests together since the entire addition is being considered as one project. The existing dwelling and attached garage were constructed in their current configuration in compliance with the applicable setback requirements and the applicants may pursue other expansion alternatives that may not require setback variances. If the Planning Commission desires to approve the entire application submittal, as proposed, the following conditions should be included: 1. A building permit be obtained prior to construction of the addition. The proposed driveway expansion is revised to be compliant with the side yard setback requirements or an additional variance is obtained to construct it as proposed. 3. The applicant shall submit grading plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 4. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. ACTION REQUESTED Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1. Recommend denial of the variance requests for construction of an addition within the required front and side yard setbacks, based on the attached findings of fact. M, 2. Recommend approval of the variance requests for construction of an addition within the required front and side yard setbacks, based on the attached findings of fact, with conditions. CIT 3. Table the request. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Aerial site map 2. Variance Application, including supporting materials 3. Exhibit 1: Potential Garage Expansion map 4. Exhibit 2: Vicki Lane Front Yard Setbacks map page 59 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL Variance Requests for Dwelling and Garage Addition 1704 Vicki Lane The following Findings of Fact are made in support of denial of the proposed request: 1. The proposed dwelling and garage addition's encroachment into the required front and side yard setbacks is inconsistent with the intent of the Code to promote green space, preserve adequate drainage and utility easement corridors, and allow for adequate buffering between structures. 2. An addition to accommodate another garage stall may be accomplished without the need for a setback variance. 3. While inconvenient or less desirable, an addition to expand the existing dwelling could be accomplished by expanding other portions of the dwelling without the need for a variance. 4. The proposed encroachments into the required setback areas constitute an unreasonable use of the setback area and will substantially increase the footprint of the structure towards the street, both of which are out of character for the neighborhood. page 60 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Variance Requests for Dwelling and Garage Addition 1704 Vicki Lane The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed request: 1. The proposed addition is a reasonable use of the subject property. 2. The proposed garage expansion is minimal and will only encroach 18 -square feet into the required side yard to provide for three vehicle stalls and will be offset by areas of the garage in which the setback is greater relative to the side property line. 3. The proposed addition cannot be accommodated within the required front and side yard setbacks due to the existing location of the dwelling on the irregularly shaped lot with cul-de-sac frontage. ,�- EXHIBIT 1: page 61 Planning Case 2014-17 Potential Garage Expansion 107 ' i 24JJ / IN - 1 S KuINP REs�C�E.Nc� EXHIBIT 2 Planning Case 2014-17 Vicki Lane 30' FY Setbacks Date: 6/16/2014 v o ao n7 "!%iii SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Planning Case 2014-17 1704 Vicki Lane Date: 6/12/2014 0 30 SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. page 64 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 6514521850 phone I 651:452.8940 fax www:mendota-heigl'ltsxc)lm 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Property Address/Street Loc tion: a L. Applicant Name: Applicant E -Mail Address: • r 1n,Mfi ' 69SAWI�WAIM, C6 M Applicant Mailing Address: 6 ' .- Property Owner Name: Property Owner Mailing Address: e�� 44,ve- Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) 1^4 i c A-1 d// 4A d%t,#A,+ Al / A 4 2d. 1141AM 9A4A!r/1* 64 AA Ore16AMAAF;,V &I_�I, Live. i- Le3< Ack � �► L" f, - ksAr- `)�f fie.' G�►� ,�., RCec,� T Type of Request: put2$ ❑ Rezoning ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD N, Variance ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Subdivision Approval ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Critical Area Permit ❑ Lot Split ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. Sig ature 6fA; . ant Date -2- /z/ &atur,nerDate .Z- Y Signature of Owner (if more than one) Date Planning Application (modified 1/28/2014) Page 1 of 1 page 65 Please answer the following questions as they relate to the variance request. You may fill in this form or create your own. 1. In your opinion, does the proposal put the property to use in a reasonable manner? YES ❑ NO Why or why not? . /H' -fir we- tot�4 Jk— A4& �tx— c' A&;%'f— Ai - /004 X004 2. Please describe the circumstances unique to the property (not created by YOU). Iry /0 WWj A Arv*� MOOLP- 3. In your opinion, will the variance, if granted, tit witn the cnaracter or the neighborhood? YES ❑ NO by or why not? A , 10r moi.. • •v Imo.. fe wJJ /1 �A s /1/F�1� The Planning Commissi n must make an affirmative finding on alf of the criteria listed above in order to grant a variance. The applicant for a variance has the burden of proof to show that all of the criteria listed above have been satisfied. Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 1216/2013) Page 2 of 3 Date: page 66 SIGNATURES OF CONSENT FOR WAIVING PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENT To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission From: _" Subject: Application for a Variance at: 110YAkt—Li Z44641 The request for a variance is to construct: (MrA4,4n�2n�— ,x.► We the undersigned have reviewed the plans for 1 76!4 01 c.K', 1A&e c.._ , and understand the terms and conditions of the requested variance. We have no objections to this request and do hereby give our written consent and consent to waiver of public hearing. Sincerely, NAME (Please Print) SIGNATURE . Vis. • � •: t .l_.a�i�r"r"' ADDRESS (INCL. LOT) /70'7 11A-lelf Z14"V£ lib t -A o- I ,A vxe- \CA iV . ., 3 �G Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 12/6/2013) Page 3 of 3 page 67 Parcel ID: 27-76400-01-240 1707 VICKI LN MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Property Details Comparable Properties Subdivision Plat Tax Statement Tax Payment Stub Tax Facts [Click to enlarge photo] Owner JOSEPH & MICHELE B MORGAN Owner Address 1707 VICKI LN SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3657 Municipality MENDOTA HEIGHTS Primary Use RESIDENTIAL Acres 0.51 Square Feet 22,298 Sale Value (Improved) $0 Plat Name TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Tax Description PT N OF LINE OF LOT 23 BLK 1 COM INT W LINE & N LINE LOT 15 E TO PT ON E LINE LOT 23 8 FT N OF SE COR & PT OF LOT 24 BLK 1 LYING W OF W LINE LOT 35 EXT S TO VICKI LANE Lot and Block 241 PLS Location SEI/4 SWI/4 SECTION 23-028-23 School District 197 page 68 Parcel ID: 27-76400-01-120 1686 LILAC LN MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Property Details Comparable Properties Subdivision Plat Tax Statement Tax Payment Stub Tax Facts [Click to enlarge photo] Owner LEWIS A & MARJORIE BLUSTIN Owner Address 1686 LILAC LN SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3646 Municipality MENDOTA HEIGHTS Primary Use RESIDENTIAL Acres 0.47 Square Feet 20,413 Sale Value (Improved) $0 Plat Name TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Lot and Block 121 PLS Location NE1/4 SW1/4 SECTION 23-028-23 School District 197 Watershed District LOWER MISSISSIPPI page 69 Parcel ID: 27-76400-01-320 1713 VICTORIA RD S MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Property Details Comparable Properties Subdivision Plat Tax Statement Tax Payment Stub Tax Facts [Click to enlarge photo] Owner KEITH J & NANCY E STANTON Owner Address 1713 VICTORIA RD S SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3661 Municipality MENDOTA HEIGHTS Primary Use RESIDENTIAL Acres 0.32 Square Feet 13,754 Date of Sale (Improved) 2/26/1997 Sale Value (Improved) $137,000 Plat Name TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Lot and Block 321 PLS Location SEI/4 SWI/4 SECTION 23-028-23 School District 197 Watershed District LOWER MISSISSIPPI page 70 Parcel ID: 27-76400-01-260 1710 VICKI LN MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Property Details Comparable Properties Subdivision Plat Tax Statement Tax Payment Stub Tax Facts [Click to enlarge photo] Owner MARA BENJAMIN Joint Owner LAURIE MIRYAM KABAKOV Owner Address 1710 VICKI LN MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Municipality MENDOTA HEIGHTS Primary Use RESIDENTIAL Acres 0.28 Square Feet 12,339 Date of Sale (Improved) 8/4/2008 Sale Value (Improved) $350,000 Plat Name TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Lot and Block 261 PLS Location SEI/4 SWI/4 SECTION 23-028-23 School District 197 page 71 Parcel ID: 27-76400-01-360 1691 VICTORIA RD S MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Property Details Comparable Properties Subdivision Plat Tax Statement Tax Payment Stub Tax Facts [Click to enlarge photo] Owner KRISTI K ODEGARD BERGENE Owner Address 1691 VICTORIA RD S MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118 Municipality MENDOTA HEIGHTS Primary Use RESIDENTIAL Acres 0.69 Square Feet 30,094 Date of Sale (Improved)10/4/2010 Sale Value (Improved) $230,000 Plat Name TILSENS HIGHLAND HEIGHTS Tax Description ALL OF LOT 35 BLK 1 & S 1/2 OF Lot and Block 361 PLS Location NEI/4 SWI/4'SECTION 23-028-23 School District 197 page 72 Nolan Wall From: Ned Rukavina Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 9:20 AM To: Nolan Wall Subject: 1704 Vicki Lane - Variance Nolan, Hi - Just a quick note to follow up on the variance application that I submitted this Morning. We are planning an addition to our home to add a garage stall, increase the size of our existing garage, add a mudroom, small studio and remodel our kitchen. Landscaping will be rework and the driveway will be limited to an efficient form. Joe & Michelle Morgan ... the neighbor most effected by our plans have walked the site with us and are comfortable with our proposal. Provided everything comes together ... a Fall construction start would be planned. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you need anything else. Thank for your assistance with this process. Best regards, Ned page 73 107 i 24u] / IN - 1 S �ur�AUINP REs�C�E.Nc� page 74 page 75 Affidavit ®f Publication State of Minnesota SS County of Dakota ANNE THILLEN being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printedNOTICE OF HEARING which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY , the 8 TH day of JUNE 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of , 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: `ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ `ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ *abcdetgh ijklmnopq rstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me on t is 9TH day of JUNE _ 20 14 BY: L. /Y r. 74&,, TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR Notary Public "Alphabet should be in the same, size and kind of type as the notice. =` `f®NYA R VIlH{TEHEAD :. �^ Notary Public -Minnesota RATE INFORMATION My Commission Expires J.31 n 312015 (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space............................................................... $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ............................................. $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter.......................................................... $ per col. inch 1/14 page 76 APU13LIC HEARING ON'A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO'.. meeting. Lorri Smith City Clerk (South-West Review: June 8, 2014) Planning Case 2014-17 Public bearing Notice Mailing List 277640100220 277640001240 1689 LILAC LN 1707 VICKI LN ALLAN RUST JOSEPH & MICHELE B MORGAN 277640001270 0 1720 VICKI LN EDUARDO CHAVEZ 2.77640100200 0 1695 LILAC LN JAMES S KULHANEK 277640001280 0 1724 VICKI LN JILL M RUKAVINA 277640001130 ED 1694 LILAC LN JOAN R BEHR YARMO 277640001120 1686 LILAC LN LEWIS A & MARJORIE BLUSTIN 277640001260 1710 VICKI LN MARA BENJAMIN 277640001330 1705 VICTORIA RD MARCIA M BYRD 277640001140 1700 LILAC LN MARK H & JOANNE L MANSUR page 77 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 432 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 6/4/2014 277127502020 277640001370 1690 CELIA RD 1681 VICTORIA RD S ALLEN & BETH SHAW KATHLEEN PINE LEMAY 277640001210 277640001320 1721 VICKI LN to 1713 VICTORIA RD S CHRISTOPHER & ANNA KINCANNON KEITH J & NANCY E STANTON 277640001230 278195000020 1711 VICKI LN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS KEITH R BELLIS 277640100221 277127502010 a 1681 LILAC LN M 1696 CELIA RD CRAIG B FAULKNER KEVIN J & BEVERLY E BOHRER 277640001340 277640001360 1699 VICTORIA RD S 1691 VICTORIA RD S EDUARDO CHAVEZ KRISTI K ODEGARD BERGENE 277640001270 0 1720 VICKI LN EDUARDO CHAVEZ 2.77640100200 0 1695 LILAC LN JAMES S KULHANEK 277640001280 0 1724 VICKI LN JILL M RUKAVINA 277640001130 ED 1694 LILAC LN JOAN R BEHR YARMO 277640001120 1686 LILAC LN LEWIS A & MARJORIE BLUSTIN 277640001260 1710 VICKI LN MARA BENJAMIN 277640001330 1705 VICTORIA RD MARCIA M BYRD 277640001140 1700 LILAC LN MARK H & JOANNE L MANSUR page 77 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 432 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 6/4/2014 page 78 Page 2 277640001100 � 2.70370013010 1672 LILAC LN !�7 MARY E KINGSTON �•/ STATE OF MN DOT 277127501050 277640001200 1679 CELIA RD 1733 VICKI LN NAUM & MARINA LIBERMAN STEPHEN P & MAUREEN BARRY 277640001250 1704 VICKI LN NED V RUKAVINA 277640001090 1666 LILAC LN PATRICIA M CARSON 277640001310 1721 VICTORIA RD S PATRICK T SEIFERT 277640001180 1730 LILAC LN STEVEN M MASSEY 277640001150 ta 1704 LILAC LN THOMAS J & NANCY ] NELSON 277640001201 1725 VICKI LN THOMAS P PARKER 277640001170 277640001300 1710 LILAC LN 1731 VICTORIA RD ROLLIN NEIL LARSON THOMAS S KREAGER 277640001380 277640001290 1671 VICTORIA RD S 1732 VICKI LN ROXY A KLEIN TRACI A GELLER 277640001110 1678 LILAC LN SANDRA & PER MOBERG Disclaimer; Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 431 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 6/4/2014 page 79 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 551Q 7b 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com r OPP— CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: July 15, 2014 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Resolution Denying a Lot Split, Lot Width Variance, Detached Garage Size Variance, and Wetlands Permit BACKGROUND The applicants reside at 677 4' Avenue and have applied for a lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit to subdivide the parcel in order to construct a new single-family dwelling. The subject parcel is 1.19 acres and contains an existing single-family dwelling with an attached garage, a 1,064 -square foot detached garage, and an accessory structure. The parcel is zoned R-1 and guided for low density residential development. The subject parcel was formerly two lots containing two dwellings. The applicant was required to combine the lots in order to demolish the dwelling on the easterly lot, so as not to create a nonconformity with accessory structures without a principal structure. It is the applicant's desire to maintain the existing detached garage on Parcel A, as shown on the survey map, and demolish the existing accessory structure. The applicant initially applied for a lot split to create a new 15,055 -square foot lot with 100 feet of frontage and a noncompliant side lot line (as included on the survey as part of the 05.27.14 Staff Report). Staff presented alternative options for the applicant and Planning Commission to discuss at the May 27 meeting and tabled the discussion to consider an amended application. The amended application included a variance request from the 100 -foot lot width requirement in order to comply with the side lot line requirements. The existing detached garage is oversized by 64 square feet (6%), based on the recently amended Code requirements for parcels between 0.75 and 1.5 acres, and requires a variance to remain on Parcel A of the proposed subdivision. In addition, the subject parcel is within 100 feet of a wetland or water resource -related area. If approvals for the subdivision and variance requests are granted, a wetlands permit would be required prior to construction of a new dwelling. As a result, Staff recommended the applicant also include a wetlands permit as part of the application submittal. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings at the May 27 and June 24 meetings. The only public comments were in support of the request from surrounding property owners. BUDGETIMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended denial of the four requests included in the application submittal, as described in Planning Case 2014-13. If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting RESOLUTION 2014-38 RESOLUTION DENYING A LOT SPLIT, LOT WIDTH VARIANCE, DETACHED GARAGE SIZE VARIANCE, AND WETLANDS PERMIT. This matter requires a simple majority vote. page 80 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014-38 RESOLUTION DENYING A LOT SPLIT, LOT WIDTH VARIANCE, DETACHED GARAGE SIZE VARIANCE, AND WETLANDS PERMIT WHEREAS, Ken and Mary Kay Noack have applied for a lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit to subdivide the parcel at 677 4" Avenue in order to construct a single-family dwelling (PID#: 27-69703-07-082, SMITH TT SUBDIVISION NO. 4, LOTS 3 THRU 8 BLOCK 7 & PRT OF VAC 20 FT ALLEY ACCRUING THERETO, LOT 8, BLOCK 7) as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meetings on May 27 and June 24, 2014. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby denied with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed subdivision does not meet the lot width standards and is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Code. 2. The practical difficulties associated with the lot width variance request are not unique to the property. They are created by the applicant's desire to maintain the existing detached garage on Parcel A, which resulted from the required lot combination in order to demolish the former dwelling on Parcel B. 3. The applicant has other options for subdividing the subject parcel in compliance with the Code. 4. In order to facilitate a compliant subdivision of the subject parcel and eliminate the need for the variance requests, the existing detached garage can be demolished and reconstructed on Parcel A in compliance with the Code requirements. 5. The detached garage size variance and wetlands permit requests are no longer relevant if the proposed subdivision and lot width variance requests are not approved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this fifteenth day of July, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 81 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2014-38 (ALTERNATE) RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT, LOT WIDTH VARIANCE, DETACHED GARAGE SIZE VARIANCE, AND WETLANDS PERMIT WHEREAS, Ken and Mary Kay Noack have applied for a lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit to subdivide the parcel at 677 4th Avenue in order to construct a single-family dwelling (PID#: 27-69703-07-082, SMITH TT SUBDIVISION NO. 4, LOTS 3 THRU 8 BLOCK 7 & PRT OF VAC 20 FT ALLEY ACCRUING THERETO, LOT 8, BLOCK 7) as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meetings on May 27 and June 24, 2014. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed subdivision would create two parcels that are compliant with the R-1 Zoning District lot size and setback standards. 2. The newly -created parcel would be larger than the original platted 66 -foot wide lot in the same location and construction of a new dwelling on a 70 -foot wide Parcel B would result in the same density of development along 4th Avenue as a 100 -foot wide lot. 3. The surrounding neighborhood contains numerous lots that are legally nonconforming with the existing 100 -foot lot width standard, some as narrow as 60 feet. 4. The existing detached garage is a legal nonconforming structure and pre -dates the recent Code amendment. 5. The proposed subdivision would allow Parcel A to maintain the ability to contain a 1,000 - square foot detached garage with a conditional use permit. 6. The existing 1,064 -square foot detached garage structure meets the purposes and intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 7. The construction of a dwelling on Parcel B would have no negative impacts on the surrounding wetland/water resource -related area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the lot split, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit requests as proposed in Planning Case 2014-13 are hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. A building permit be obtained prior to construction of a new dwelling. 2. The existing accessory structure is demolished, as noted on the survey included in the application submittal. 3. The applicant shall dedicate 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front property lines and 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the side and rear property lines to be denoted on the map submitted to Dakota County. 4. Park dedication fee in the amount of $2,700, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. 5. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. page 82 6. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 7. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this fifteenth day of July, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 83 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com , CITY OF MENDIDTA HEIGHTS DATE: June 24, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-13 Subdivision Request for a Lot Split, Lot Width and Detached Garage Size Variances, and Wetlands Permit APPLICANT: Ken and Mary Kay Noack PROPERTY ADDRESS: 677 4' Avenue ZONING/GUIDED: R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential ACTION DEADLINE: August 26, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is seeking approval to subdivide the existing parcel at 677 4' Avenue into two parcels and is requesting variances from the lot width and detached garage size standards. In addition, if the subdivision and variance requests were to be approved, the applicant is also seeking a wetlands permit to construct a dwelling on the new parcel. BACKGROUND The subject parcel is approximately 1.19 acres and contains a single-family dwelling with an attached garage, a 1,064 -square foot detached garage, and an accessory structure. The parcel is zoned R-1 One Family Residential and guided for low density residential development. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject parcel to create an additional parcel to construct a single-family dwelling in the future. The subject parcel was formerly two lots containing two dwellings. The applicant was required to combine the lots in order to demolish the dwelling on the easterly lot, so as not to create a nonconformity with an accessory structure without a principal structure. It is the applicant's desire to maintain the existing detached garage on Parcel A, as shown on the survey map, and demolish the existing accessory structure. The applicant originally applied for a subdivision to create a new 15,055 -square foot lot with 100 feet of frontage and a noncompliant side lot line. The Planning Commission discussed other options available to the applicant and tabled the discussion to consider an amended application. The applicant is now seeking a variance from the 100 -foot lot width requirement in order to comply with the side lot line requirements. The City Council recently amended the Code to allow an additional detached garage for dwellings with an attached garage, based on compliance with certain lot and structure size requirements. The existing detached garage exceeds the allowable size standards and requires a variance to remain on Parcel A in compliance with the Code if a subdivision is approved. In addition, the subject parcel is within 100 feet of a wetland or water resource -related area. If approvals for the subdivision and variance requests were to be granted, a wetlands permit would be required prior to page 84 construction of a new dwelling. As a result, Staff recommended the applicant also include a wetlands permit as part of the application submittal. ANALYSIS Lot Split Title 11-3-2 of the Code (Subdivision Ordinance) allows the subdivision of parcels, provided that the resulting lots are compliant with the requirements of the applicable zoning district. According to the survey map included as part of the application submittal, and shown in the table below, Parcel B does not meet the lot width requirements and requires a variance. However, the lot size and setback requirements are met for both parcels. *final front yard setback to be determined and confirmed during the building permit application review **measurements based on proposed 2,640 sq. ft. building pad as shown on the survey map — future dwelling could be located anywhere within the proposed area Lot Width Variance The applicant has amended the original subdivision application, which proposed to create a 100 -foot wide lot with a noncompliant side lot line, to create a 70 -foot wide lot with compliant side lot lines. The amended request requires a variance from the minimum lot width standard in the R-1 District for Parcel B in order to accommodate the existing detached garage structure on Parcel A. When considering a variance for the reduced lot width, the City is required to find that: 1. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. Single-family residential dwellings on both parcels and a detached garage on Parcel A are reasonable uses of the properties and are compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. Title 11-3-2(D) of the Code requires that "every lot must the have the minimum frontage as required in the zoning ordinance on a city -approved street other than an alley. " As noted, the minimum lot width for a newly -created lot in the R-1 District is 100 feet. 2. The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the property which are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations. The practical difficulties of this request are not unique to the property and are created by the applicant. The lot combination which created the existing 1.19 -acre subject parcel was required in order to demolish the former dwelling located on the proposed Parcel B, which originally contained the existing detached garage. The applicant's request for a variance to create a 70 -foot wide lot is driven by the desire to have the garage remain on Parcel A. Removal and reconstruction, or relocation, of the existing detached garage farther onto Parcel A is an option to avoid the lot width variance request. According to the applicant, the structure is not able to be relocated Standard Parcel A Parcel B Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 32,900 sq. ft. 18,922 sq. ft. (0.34 acres) (0.76 acres) (0.43 acres) Lot Width 100 ft. 179.27 ft. 70 ft. Front Yard Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. (approx.) 33 ft.* Side Yard Setback 10 ft. (up to 15' depending on 75 ft. (dwelling) 10 ft.** structure height) 10.3 ft. (garage) Rear Yard 30 ft. or 20% of the average lot 70 ft. (dwelling) 190 ft. depth (whichever is eater) 170 ft. (garage) *final front yard setback to be determined and confirmed during the building permit application review **measurements based on proposed 2,640 sq. ft. building pad as shown on the survey map — future dwelling could be located anywhere within the proposed area Lot Width Variance The applicant has amended the original subdivision application, which proposed to create a 100 -foot wide lot with a noncompliant side lot line, to create a 70 -foot wide lot with compliant side lot lines. The amended request requires a variance from the minimum lot width standard in the R-1 District for Parcel B in order to accommodate the existing detached garage structure on Parcel A. When considering a variance for the reduced lot width, the City is required to find that: 1. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. Single-family residential dwellings on both parcels and a detached garage on Parcel A are reasonable uses of the properties and are compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. Title 11-3-2(D) of the Code requires that "every lot must the have the minimum frontage as required in the zoning ordinance on a city -approved street other than an alley. " As noted, the minimum lot width for a newly -created lot in the R-1 District is 100 feet. 2. The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the property which are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations. The practical difficulties of this request are not unique to the property and are created by the applicant. The lot combination which created the existing 1.19 -acre subject parcel was required in order to demolish the former dwelling located on the proposed Parcel B, which originally contained the existing detached garage. The applicant's request for a variance to create a 70 -foot wide lot is driven by the desire to have the garage remain on Parcel A. Removal and reconstruction, or relocation, of the existing detached garage farther onto Parcel A is an option to avoid the lot width variance request. According to the applicant, the structure is not able to be relocated page 85 due to its construction and condition, and therefore presents a practical difficulty and is not a viable option for consideration at this time (see Exhibit 1). 3. The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. The neighborhood contains existing lots of record with varying widths. As shown in Exhibit 2, the neighborhood has approximately 30 lots that are existing nonconformities with the 100 -foot lot width standard. Of those, approximately 9 lots are 70 feet wide or less. Regardless of the approved lot configuration, no more than one additional dwelling can be created from the subject parcel. Therefore, construction on a 70 -foot wide lot instead of a 100 -foot wide lot has the same density along this stretch of 4' Avenue. However, while Parcel B may be consistent with other narrow lot widths in the neighborhood and would create another lot for single-family residential development, redevelopment in the area will most likely consist of larger lots compliant with the Code requirements. Detached Garage Size Variance Ordinance 454, passed by the City Council in January 2014, amended the Code to allow for detached and attached private garages for residential properties in compliance with the following size requirements: Lot Size .75 acres or less Permitted Not Allowed Conditional Use Permit Not Allowed >.75 acres — 1.5 acres 750 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. >1.5 acres — 2.5 acres 1,000 sq. ft. 1,200 sq. ft. >2.5 acres 1,500 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. The existing dwelling on the entire 1.19 -acre subject parcel contains an attached garage and 1,064 -square foot detached garage. Currently, the garage is a legal nonconforming structure due to the subject parcel being less than 1.5 acres. Title 12 -1D -1(D)(4) of the Code allows normal maintenance of a legal nonconforming structure which does not intensify the nonconformity. However, according to Title 12 -1D - 3(B)(5) of the Code: In the event that any property upon which an accessory structure or structures have been erected shall later be subdivided, then the number and size of accessory structures on the subdividedproperty shall conform to the requirements of this chapter, and those which do not conform shall be relocated, removed or reconstructed so that they do conform. As a result of the proposed subdivision request, the existing detached garage requires a variance from the lot size requirement. When considering a variance for the garage to remain on Parcel A, as in the proposed subdivision request, the City is required to find that: 1. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The Code allows for additional detached garages on residential parcels with an attached garage. While over -sized based on the lot size standards, the continued use of the existing detached garage on a residential property over 0.75 acres is reasonable and meets the purposes and intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan. 2. The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the property which are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations. The Code requires a parcel with an attached garage to be at least 0.75 acres in order to construct an additional detached garage. On parcels larger than 0.75 acres and less than 1.5 acres, a 1,000 -square foot page 86 structure is permitted by conditional use permit. The entire subject parcel is 1.19 acres, which makes the existing 1,064 -square foot detached garage a legal nonconforming structure. As in the proposed subdivision request, Parcel A would maintain the existing structure and is over 0.75 acres. The existing detached garage pre -dates the current Code requirements and exceeds the applicable structure size requirement based on the proposed lot size by 6% (64 square feet). Applying the recently -adopted size standards for an existing detached garage creates a practical difficulty in subdividing the parcel in compliance with the Code, without demolishing and reconstructing the structure. 3. The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. The neighborhood contains a mix of attached and detached garages. However, few parcels containing an attached garage have the required acreage to construct an additional detached garage. As noted, the existing structure pre -dates the Code requirements and has existed in its current location as the neighborhood developed around it. Regardless of any future subdivision, it will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Wetlands Permit As noted, if a lot split is approved, the applicant intends to construct a single-family residential dwelling on Parcel B. Title 12-2-6(A) of the Code requires a wetlands permit for the construction, alteration, or removal of any structure within the 100 -foot wetland or water resource -related buffer area. In an effort to avoid another planning application approval process prior to applying for a building permit to construct the dwelling, Staff recommended the applicant seek approval of a wetlands permit in conjunction with the other requests. The purpose of the Wetlands Systems Chapter of the Code is to (Title 12-2-1): 1. Provide for protection, preservation, maintenance, and use wetlands and water resource -related areas; 2. Maintain the natural drainage system; 3. Minimize disturbance which may result from alteration by earthwork, loss of vegetation, loss of wildlife and aquatic organisms as a result of the disturbance of the natural environment or from excessive sedimentation; 4. Provide for protection of potable fresh water supplies; and 5. Ensure safety from floods. The subject parcel is located approximately 60 feet from a wetland/water resource -related area and is separated by 4' Avenue. The construction of a dwelling Parcel B would have no negative impacts on the surrounding wetland/water resource -related area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the proposed subdivision and lot width variance requests. If the Planning Commission desires to make a similar recommendation, the detached garage size variance and wetlands permit should also be denied because they are dependent on approval of the subdivision and lot width variance requests. If the Planning Commission desires to approve the entire application submittal, as proposed, the following conditions should be included: 1. A building permit be obtained prior to construction of a new dwelling. page 87 The existing accessory structure is demolished, as noted on the survey included in the application submittal. 3. The applicant shall dedicate 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front property lines and 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the side and rear property lines to be denoted on the map submitted to Dakota County. 4. Park dedication fee in the amount of $2,700, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. 5. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 7. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. ACTION REQUESTED Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1. Recommend denial of the proposed subdivision, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit requests based on the attached findings of fact. '1 Recommend approval of the proposed subdivision, lot width variance, detached garage size variance, and wetlands permit requests based on the attached findings of fact, with conditions. '1 3. Table the request. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Aerial site map 2. Applications, including supporting materials 3. Exhibit 1: Site photos 4. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Lot Widths map page 88 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL Subdivision Request for Lot Split, Lot Width Variance, Detached Garage Size Variance, and Wetlands Permit 677 4te Avenue The following Findings of Fact are made in denial of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed subdivision does not meet the lot width standards and is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Code. The practical difficulties associated with the lot width variance request are not unique to the property. They are created by the applicant's desire to maintain the existing detached garage on Parcel A, which resulted from the required lot combination in order to demolish the former dwelling on Parcel B. 3. The applicant has other options for subdividing the subject parcel in compliance with the Code. 4. In order to facilitate a compliant subdivision of the subject parcel and eliminate the need for the variance requests, the existing detached garage can be demolished and reconstructed on Parcel A in compliance with the Code requirements. 5. The detached garage size variance and wetlands permit requests are no longer relevant if the proposed subdivision and lot width variance requests are not approved. page 89 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Subdivision Request for Lot Split, Lot Width Variance, Detached Garage Size Variance, and Wetlands Permit 677 4te Avenue The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed subdivision would create two parcels that are compliant with the R-1 Zoning District lot size and setback standards. 2. The newly -created parcel would be larger than the original platted 66 -foot wide lot in the same location and construction of a new dwelling on a 70 -foot wide Parcel B would result in the same density of development along 4' Avenue as a 100 -foot wide lot. 3. The surrounding neighborhood contains numerous lots that are legally nonconforming with the existing 100 -foot lot width standard, some as narrow as 60 feet. 4. The existing detached garage is a legal nonconforming structure and pre -dates the recent Code amendment. 5. The proposed subdivision would allow Parcel A to maintain the ability to contain a 1,000 -square foot detached garage with a conditional use permit. 6. The existing 1,064 -square foot detached garage structure meets the purposes and intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 7. The construction of a dwelling on Parcel B would have no negative impacts on the surrounding wetland/water resource -related area. page 90 PLANNING CASE 2014-13 Source: Staff Figure 1: Existing Detached Garage 171YU EXHIBIT 2 Planning Case 2014-13 City of Neighborhood Lot Widths 0 230 M Mendota Date- 6/13/2014 Heights I SCALE IN FEET 4Lah -7-11 -- — -- ---- -- 678 ------ C ------ r 0 00 6 6 T9[9%1 14 inaa.i am i 6, 14 5 .--- I Fbq 6 1 J67 6 ill 4 67 L 1459 13 E3 41 66 6 1 L F6 15 ------------- 8 ----------- 5 1 5 480 1 K 716 > go 9 02 1 0 ------ - 15 9 15 E3 1416 15 1 I 665 io 1 EP -1 ' 6 1 r5FF��❑ ! : E315 1527-71- LOT WIDTH -------------------------------- - < 70- ...154 662 > 70'and < 100' 65 GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Planning Case 2014-13 677 4th Avenue Date: 5/19/2014 U) J J Q Z R i v 0 70 M SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights s GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. 1101 Victoria Curve I Mpdota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www,mendota-heights.com CITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS May 28, 2014 Ken and Mary Noack 677 4°i Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Planning Case 2014-13 — Application Extension Dear Mr. and Mrs. Noack: Based on the comments from the May 27 Planning Commission meeting, it is our understanding you intend to submit an amended application for consideration at the June 24 meeting. Your application was deemed complete on April 28, 2014, starting a 60 -day review period, which will expire June 27, 2014. At this time, the City is extending the time limit an additional 60 days until August 26, 2014 in compliance with MN STAT. 15.99 (2013). The extension is necessary to facilitate the appropriate review timeline in accordance with upcoming meeting dates. As discussed, the following items should be included in the amended application: 1. Cover letter referencing the additional variance request 2. Variance request application for the lot width reduction 3. Revised survey, including labeled parcels ("A" and `B") and required drainage and utility easements We look forward to continuing the application review process. Please contact me with any additional questions at 651.452.1850 or nolanw@mendota-heights.com. Sincerely, Nolan Wall, AICP Planner cc/cc: Planning Case File #2014-13 Applicant (via email: noackken@yahoo.com) Tom Lehmann, City Attorney (via email: Tlehmann@eckberglammers.com) Enclosure: Variance Request Application page 94 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651:452.8940 Fax www:mendota-f7eiglits:com CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Property Address/Street Location:. 7:2� ��y' AP, Applicant Name: K�- -„o c � /t/v,¢e'hone:� �% lS7 &g f IO Applicant E -Mail Address:ge �✓!"I i� a Applicant Mailing Address: (, >7 e17_77 /14/L - Property Owner Name: ,, ^18,0e/e— Phone: Property Owner Mailing Address: 52ZW;£ Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) a> 7 9n'3�`7 Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning Variance ❑ Subdivision Approval ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit Wetlands Permit ❑ Critical Area Permit qael of Split ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. y _16/_111 Signature of Applicatr Date Signature of Ownerl�� Date Signature of Owner (if more than one) Date Planning Application (modified 1/28/2014) Page 1 of 1 page 95 1101 Victoria Curve. I Mendota Heights. MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651:4518940 fax __ ��w�ti:mendota-hefgllts:co,m ,,,, CITY OF MENDO.TA HEIGHTS. WETLANDS PERMIT REQUEST Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. • If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller — only submit originals. • If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8'/2 x 11. • Any drawing in color — must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: ❑ Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). `) Letter of Intent. �jj k ❑ Full and adequate description of all phases of the operation and/or proposed physical changes. Nl ❑ Soil survey map of the proposed plat. )ff Topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals. v'114' ❑ Detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading, and landscaping. ❑ Site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the N 1 site. ❑ Information on existing drainage and vegetation of all land within the site. ❑ Time period for completion of development including timing for staging of development if A114- applicable. Wl A- ❑ Design specifications for all sediment and erosion control measures. Wetlands Permit Request (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 0 page 96 1161Victoria Curve I Mendota H69ht5, MN 35178 $51.452.1850 phone 1 WA5189,40'fax wwvJ.meiidota=tieigBts:com c1 r, .9r IVIENOOTA HEIGHTS VARIANCE CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. A variance is a request to vary from the City of Mendota Heights zoning standards. Under Minnesota State Law, variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code and when consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning standards. "Practical difficulties," in regards to variance requests, has three parts: (1) the proposed use of the property is a reasonable; (2) unique circumstances exist on the property which are not created by the landowner; and (3) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Please consider these requirements carefully before requesting a variance. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. • If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller— only submit originals. • If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8 Y2 x 11. • Any drawing in color — must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. bM Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). Sketch plan showing all pertinent dimensions, and including the location of any easements having an influence upon the variance request. Letter of Intent. Please complete the attached questions regarding your request. Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 of 3 page 97 Please answer the following questions as they relate to the variance request. You may fill in this form or create your own. 1. In your opinion, does the proposal peat the property to use in a reasonable manner? IN YES ® NO vvny or why not? This garage has been on this family property and in continuous use since 1962. It is still needed and used for storage of antiques and equipment dating back to the original homestead in 1900. e. a -,ease aescrioe ine circumstances unique to the props not created by you). This garage was built at 1064 sq. feet out of cement blocks. It can't be moved or down sized to conform with the current City code. 3. In your opinion, will the variance, if granted, fit with the character of the neighborhood? YES ® NO vvny or why not? This garage has been in the neighborhood before most of the houses have been built. There are other detached garages near by at 665 & 662 4th ave, and a much larger pole bam at 723 3rd ave. This garage is in an older established neighborhood with very low density on 4th ave. (4 homes including ours) The Planning must makes an affirma$ivsa fndinn nn arr sof th® swit®rG� /icFenl above in order to grant a variance. The applicant for a variance has the burden of proof to shove that all of the criteria listed above have been satisfied. Variance Checklist/Quesdonnaire (modified 921612093) Page 2 of 3 page 98 May 28, 2014 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission and City Council 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights MN 55118 From: Ken Noack, Mary Kay Noack 677 4th Ave Mendota Heights MN 55118 RE: Variance for a 70 ft. lot width Dear members of the Planning Commission and Council: We are requesting a variance to allow for a 70 ft. front lot width as part of our Planning Case 2014-13. This lot was originally platted at 66 ft. wide and had a house on it until 2010. This will allow for a perpendicular side lot line to be in compliant with the code. This also does allow a large enough lot for a home to be built on. Thank you for your additional consideration. Sincerely, Ken Noack Mary Kay Noack page 99 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota. Heights, HN 55118 551.452.1850 phone 1 551:452:8940fax `- .i wwtv:meiitlota-fieic�hEs:com CITY 'OF IMENDOTA HEIGHTS VARIANCE CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE A variance is a request to vary from the City of Mendota Heights zoning standards. Under Minnesota State Law, variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code and when consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning standards. "Practical difficulties," in regards to variance requests, has three parts: (1) the proposed use of the property is a reasonable; (2) unique circumstances exist on the property which are not created by the landowner; and (3) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Please consider these requirements carefully before requesting a variance. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. ® If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller— only submit originals. ® If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8'/ x 11. • Any drawing in color— must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: ❑ Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. `®'Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). �4—Sketch plan showing all pertinent dimensions, and including the location of any easements having an influence upon the variance request. Letter of Intent. Please complete the attached questions regarding your request. Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 12/6/2093) Page 1 of 3 page 100 Please answer the following questions as they relate to the variance request. You may fill in this form or create your own. 1. In your opinion, does the proposal put the property to use in a reasonable manner? Od YES ❑ NO Why or why not? This lot with a 70ft front footage is large enough for a single family home. At 70 feet wide, this lot would comply with the code requirement of having side lot lines perpedicular to 4th avenue. This proposed lot would be 18,900 sq. ft. which exceeds the code requirements. c. riease aescnoe the circumstances unique to the propertv (not created by vou). Because of the detached garage location, a lot split with a 100 ft. front lot line creates an uneven side lot line, not compliant with Title 11-3-2 (C) of the cde. s. in your opinion, wm the variance, it granted, fit with the character of the neighborhood? ® YES ❑ NO Why or why not? The original lot plat from 1887 had a 66 ft. lot on this same plat. There was a house on this lot until 2010. There are numerous other lots in this neighborhood that are non conforming, some as narrow as 60 ft. i ne rianning Commission must make an affirmative finding on all of the criteria listed above in order to grant a variance. The applicant for a variance has the burden of proof to show that all of the criteria listed above have been satisfied. Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 12/6/2013) Page 2 of 3 60 60 w LU cc C C J LL z a c c 0 C at Boundaryand Location Surve for= y KEN NOACK 677 4th Avenue Mendota Heights 0 10 20 40 60 Scale in Feet r+ LEGEND e Iron Monument Found NOTE This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title commitment. All easements of record may not be shown. EXISTING GARAGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Minnesota I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 2nd day of June, 2014. REHDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas J. Adam, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43414 4TH A VENUE Revised June 4, 2014 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal Drive • Suite 110 • Eagan, Minnesota • Phone (651) 452-5051 JOB: 144-2727.010 page 102 Affidavit ®f Publication State of Minnesota SS County of Dakota ANNE THILLEN being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printedNOTICE OF HEARING which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY_, the 8TH day of JUNE 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including the day of 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which -is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 'abcdefgh ijklmnopq rstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me on th's 9TH day of JUNE 14 Notary Public BY:Q�.V. TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. w 5� ,= Notary Public -Minnesota RATE INFORMATION My Commission Expires Jan 91, 2015 (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space............................................................... $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ............................................. $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter.......................................................... $ per col. inch 1/14 page 103 page 104 Planning Case 2014-13 Public Hearing Notice Mailing List 276970304081 2.77120000040 1502 VANDALL ST 1509 DODD RD AGNES C TSTE MCCLUNEY DEAN S & BARBARA VERDOES 2714701000121 271470000221 10 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 101 M 683 WENTWORTH AVE W W2 ALLEN & JUDITH WERTHAUSER ELIZABETH H GUTHMANN 277120000090 277120000080 1500 SOMERSET CT M 1490 SOMERSET CT ANDREW W & NANCY W LYNN ERIC C & LAURIE LYNN TOSTRUD 277120000120 1485 SOMERSET CT FRANCIS & HELGA E PARNELL 271470000201 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 303 GAYLORD & RUTH TRST GLARNER 277120000110 1495 SOMERSET CT GEORGE H & MARCELLA KEYS 271470000211 695 WENTWORTH AVE W W1 HURON & LETICIA M SMITH 271470000151 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 202 JANET M KING 277120000070 1480 SOMERSET CT wmdw JAY & MARILYN BREMER 277120000130 275190001030 1475 SOMERSET CT 1527 VANDALL ST DAVID W & PENNY L SCHILLING JEFF L & GAYLE E CLOSMORE Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning I inch = 305 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/7/2014 276970304020 10 678 3RD AVE S ANTON A BRUCKMUELLER 271470000091 1585 DODD RD 303 ARLENE W SONDAY 271470000061 1585 DODD RD 203 BROOKE D TSTE MORDY 2.71470000111 1575 DODD RD E2 BRUCE G TSTE ODLAUG 276970304040 666 3RD AVE CYRIL J B KOBBERMANN 277120000100 1505 SOMERSET CT DANIEL M & ELISHA G LOPEZ 277120000120 1485 SOMERSET CT FRANCIS & HELGA E PARNELL 271470000201 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 303 GAYLORD & RUTH TRST GLARNER 277120000110 1495 SOMERSET CT GEORGE H & MARCELLA KEYS 271470000211 695 WENTWORTH AVE W W1 HURON & LETICIA M SMITH 271470000151 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 202 JANET M KING 277120000070 1480 SOMERSET CT wmdw JAY & MARILYN BREMER 277120000130 275190001030 1475 SOMERSET CT 1527 VANDALL ST DAVID W & PENNY L SCHILLING JEFF L & GAYLE E CLOSMORE Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning I inch = 305 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/7/2014 page 105 Page 2 271470000151 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 201 JOHN F JR & SHARON A DIEDRICH 271470000181 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 301 JOHN ] & DELORES J WOOD 276970104023 662 4TH AVE JOSEPH M ISAAC 276970104025 JOSEPH M ISAAC 276970307082 677 4TH AVE KENNETH ] & MARY KAY NOACK 271470000191 M 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 302 NANCY JARDINE 271470000021 1585 DODD RD 102 NANCY T TSTE FIELD 276970305080 1501 VANDALL ST OLIVER B & CAROL ] HANSON 271470000041 1585 DODD RD 201 PATRICIA A TSTE TINUCCI 276970103070 665 4TH AVE PAULI STANTON 275190001010 276970306101 1515 VANDALL PAUL J STANTON LOUIS S & MARGARET P LIZARRAGA 271470000171 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 203 MARK A GIORGINI REVOCABLE TRUST 5/26/9 271470000101 1595 DODD RD E1 MARY H COMMERS 276970104030 1565 DODD RD MARY L OFLAHERTY 276970305060 684 3RD AVE MY THREE SONS LLC 271470000071 M 1585 DODD RD 301 RAYMOND A & MARY LOU MCLEVISH 271470000011. 1585 DODD RD 101 RICHARD A JAMIESON 276970305100 ROBERT & KATHLEEN BONINE 276970305050 688 3RD AVE ROBERT & KATHLEEN BOVINE Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed, This is not a Map Scale iegal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 305 feet page 106 Page 3 At F r w FC F w , w j �s w r a A r A0'�- 276970307041 277120000010 1516 VANDALL ST 661 4TH AVE ROBERT D BRADT THOMAS G & JUDITH STANTON 271470000081 271470000131 1585 DODD RD 302 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 102 ROBERT F & KAREN K GARLAND TIMOTHY R MCLEVISH 275190001020 271470000141 1521 VANDALL ST 0 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 103 ROBERT K GUENTHER TIMOTHY R MCLEVISH 271470000051 276970104024 1585 DODD RD 202 1549 DODD RD ROBERT L & MARY H TEMPLE TODD J ADRIAN 271470000031 277120000030 1585 DODD RD 103 1521 DODD RD RONALD P & HELEN J LIFSON WILLIAM D €k MICHELLE NIELSEN 277120000020 1533 DODD RD STEVEN J & KARLA J GOTHAM Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 304 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/7/2014 page 107 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com , CITY OF MENDIDTA HEIGHTS DATE: May 27, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-13 Subdivision Request for a Lot Split, Variance, and Wetlands Permit APPLICANT: Ken and Mary Kay Noack PROPERTY ADDRESS: 677 4' Avenue ZONING/GUIDED: R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential ACTION DEADLINE: June 27, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is seeking approval to subdivide the existing parcel at 677 4' Avenue into two parcels and is requesting a variance to allow an over -sized detached garage. In addition, if the request(s) were to be approved, the applicant is also seeking a wetlands permit to construct a dwelling on the new parcel. BACKGROUND The subject parcel is approximately 1.19 acres and contains a single-family dwelling with an attached garage, a 1,064 -square foot detached garage, and an accessory structure. The parcel is zoned R-1 One Family Residential and guided for low density residential development. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject parcel to create an additional parcel to construct a single-family dwelling in the future. The subject parcel was formerly two parcels containing two dwellings. The applicant was required to combine the lots in order to demolish the dwelling on the easterly lot, so as not to create a nonconformity with an accessory structure without a principal structure. It is the applicant's desire to maintain the existing detached garage on the subject parcel and demolish the existing accessory structure. The City Council recently amended the Code to allow an additional detached garage for dwellings with an attached garage, based on compliance with certain lot and structure size requirements. The existing detached garage exceeds the allowable size standards and requires a variance to remain on the subject parcel in compliance with the Code if a subdivision is approved. In addition, the subject parcel is within 100 feet of a wetland or water resource -related area. If approvals for the subdivision and variance requests were to be granted, a wetlands permit would be required prior to construction of a new dwelling. As a result, Staff recommended the applicant also include a wetlands permit as part of the application submittal. page 108 ANALYSIS Lot Split Title 11-3-2 of the Code (Subdivision Ordinance) allows the subdivision of parcels, provided that the resulting lots are compliant with the requirements of the applicable zoning district. According to the survey map included as part of the application submittal, and shown in the table below, both proposed parcels meet the R-1 lot standards. *final front yard setback to be determined and confirmed during the building permit application review **measurements based on proposed 2,750 sq. ft. building pad as shown on the survey map — future dwelling could be located anywhere within the proposed area Title 11-3-2(C) of the Code requires side lot lines to be approximately at right angles to street lines. In order to meet the 100 -foot lot width requirement on the new parcel, and maintain the existing detached garage on the subject parcel, the new lot configuration creates a non -perpendicular side lot line from 4' Avenue abutting both parcels. Side lot lines at right angles with streets lines are desired to maintain appropriate drainage and utility easements and avoid property line disputes. It is Staffs interpretation that the proposed shared side lot line is not compliant with the Code provision. The applicant can seek input from the Planning Commission on alternative lot configurations that do not create noncompliant side lot lines. The following options, among others suggested by the Planning Commission, can be considered: 1. Existing detached garage located on new parcel. It is the applicant's desire to retain the existing detached garage on the subject parcel in order to maintain ownership and use of the structure. However, its existing location on the subject parcel and inability to be relocated are causing the undesirable side lot line in order to meet the 100 -foot lot width requirement. The lots could be reconfigured to reduce the subject parcel to maintain the required size, frontage, and setback requirements for the existing dwelling and attached garage (see Exhibit 1). Title 12 -1D -3(B)(3) requires a principal structure to be constructed prior to an accessory structure. As a result, if this option was pursued, Staff would recommend a condition that requires a building permit to be applied for within one year of an approved subdivision in order to ensure compliance with this provision. 2. Variance from the 100 -foot lot width requirement. Title 11-3-2(D) requires every lot to have the minimum frontage for the appropriate zoning district on a City -approved street other than an alley. As noted above, the R-1 District requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet. In order to avoid the proposed side lot line configuration, the applicant could seek a variance from the lot width requirement. Based on the proposed survey, a revised perpendicular side lot line to maintain the required setbacks for the existing detached garage and proposed building pad would create a lot width of 70.35 feet Standard Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. 36,766 sq. ft. 15,055 sq. ft. (0.34 acres) (0.84 acres) (0.35 acres) Lot Width 100 ft. 149.27 ft. 100 ft. Front Yard Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. (approx.) 33 ft.* Side Yard Setback 10 ft. (up to 15' depending on 45 ft. (approx.) 10 ft.** structure height) Rear Yard 30 ft. or 20% of the average lot 70 ft. (approx.) 110 ft. depth (whichever is greater) *final front yard setback to be determined and confirmed during the building permit application review **measurements based on proposed 2,750 sq. ft. building pad as shown on the survey map — future dwelling could be located anywhere within the proposed area Title 11-3-2(C) of the Code requires side lot lines to be approximately at right angles to street lines. In order to meet the 100 -foot lot width requirement on the new parcel, and maintain the existing detached garage on the subject parcel, the new lot configuration creates a non -perpendicular side lot line from 4' Avenue abutting both parcels. Side lot lines at right angles with streets lines are desired to maintain appropriate drainage and utility easements and avoid property line disputes. It is Staffs interpretation that the proposed shared side lot line is not compliant with the Code provision. The applicant can seek input from the Planning Commission on alternative lot configurations that do not create noncompliant side lot lines. The following options, among others suggested by the Planning Commission, can be considered: 1. Existing detached garage located on new parcel. It is the applicant's desire to retain the existing detached garage on the subject parcel in order to maintain ownership and use of the structure. However, its existing location on the subject parcel and inability to be relocated are causing the undesirable side lot line in order to meet the 100 -foot lot width requirement. The lots could be reconfigured to reduce the subject parcel to maintain the required size, frontage, and setback requirements for the existing dwelling and attached garage (see Exhibit 1). Title 12 -1D -3(B)(3) requires a principal structure to be constructed prior to an accessory structure. As a result, if this option was pursued, Staff would recommend a condition that requires a building permit to be applied for within one year of an approved subdivision in order to ensure compliance with this provision. 2. Variance from the 100 -foot lot width requirement. Title 11-3-2(D) requires every lot to have the minimum frontage for the appropriate zoning district on a City -approved street other than an alley. As noted above, the R-1 District requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet. In order to avoid the proposed side lot line configuration, the applicant could seek a variance from the lot width requirement. Based on the proposed survey, a revised perpendicular side lot line to maintain the required setbacks for the existing detached garage and proposed building pad would create a lot width of 70.35 feet page 109 (see Exhibit 2). The neighborhood was originally platted in 1887 and contains numerous lots that are legally nonconforming with the existing 100 -foot width requirement, some as narrow as 60 feet. 3. Develop right-of-way to the north. The subject parcel borders an undeveloped City right-of-way to the north from Vandall Street that could be developed and utilized for access to a new parcel. The subject parcel's lot width bordering the right-of-way is approximately 135 feet, which would meet the R-1 District requirement (see Exhibit 3). The City Council recently denied a request to utilize an existing undeveloped right-of- way for a private driveway to serve a lot which would not have meet the 100 -foot width requirement. In initial discussions regarding subdivision options, Staff discouraged the applicant from pursuing this option and provided preliminary cost information for an improved right-of-way constructed to City standards. Therefore, a developed right-of-way is the only option to create a new lot with appropriate access which meets the frontage requirement. Due to the economic considerations of such an option, the applicant could seek participation from other interested surrounding property owners abutting the right-of-way on a collaborative subdivision plan. The applicant has indicated no interest in demolishing the existing detached garage; therefore it is not included as an option for consideration in this report. Any alternative option pursued by the applicant would require a variance for the existing detached garage to remain on either parcel. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant revise the proposed subdivision request based on direction from the Planning Commission on the alternatives listed above or others discussed at the meeting. Variance Ordinance 454, passed by the City Council in January 2014, amended the Code to allow for detached and attached private garages for residential properties in compliance with the following size requirements: Lot Size .75 acres or less Permitted Not Allowed Conditional Use Permit Not Allowed >.75 acres — 1.5 acres 750 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. >1.5 acres — 2.5 acres 1,000 sq. ft. 1,200 sq. ft. >2.5 acres 1,500 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. The existing dwelling on the entire 1.19 -acre subject parcel contains an attached garage and 1,064 -square foot detached garage. Currently, the detached garage is a legal nonconforming structure due to the subject parcel being less than 1.5 acres. Title 12 -1D -1(D)(4) of the Code allows normal maintenance of a legal nonconforming structure which does not intensify the nonconformity. However, according to Title 12 -1D - 3(B)(5) of the Code: In the event that any property upon which an accessory structure or structures have been erected shall later be subdivided, then the number and size of accessory structures on the subdividedproperty shall conform to the requirements of this chapter, and those which do not conform shall be relocated, removed or reconstructed so that they do conform. As a result of the proposed subdivision request, or any subsequent revised request, the existing detached garage requires a variance from the lot size requirement. When considering a variance for the garage to remain on the subject parcel, as in the proposed subdivision request, the City is required to find that: 1. The request is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and comprehensive plan and the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The Code allows for additional detached garages on residential parcels with an attached garage. While over -sized based on the lot size standards, the continued use of the existing detached garage on a residential page 110 property over 0.75 acres is reasonable and meets the purposes and intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan. 2. The applicant establishes there are practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance due to circumstances that are unique to the property which are not created by the applicant or based on economic considerations. The Code requires 0.75 acres for a parcel with an attached garage to construct an additional detached garage. On parcels larger than 0.75 acres and less than 1.5 acres, a 1,000 -square foot structure is permitted by conditional use permit. The entire subject parcel is 1.19 acres, which makes the existing 1,084 -square foot detached garage a legal nonconforming structure. As in the proposed subdivision request, and in the alternative options discussed in the report, the parcel maintaining the existing structure would be over 0.75 acres. The existing detached garage pre -dates the current Code requirements and exceeds the applicable structure size requirement based on the proposed lot size(s) by 84 square feet. Applying the structure size standard for an existing detached garage on a newly -created parcel creates a practical difficulty in subdividing the parcel in compliance with the Code. 3. The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. The neighborhood contains a mix of attached and detached garages. However, few parcels containing an attached garage have the required acreage to construct an additional detached garage. As noted, the existing structure pre -dates the Code requirements and has existed in its current location as the neighborhood developed around it. Regardless of any future subdivision, it will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Based on Staffs recommendation to revise the proposed subdivision request, the applicant may withdraw the request and resubmit as part of a future subdivision application submittal. Wetlands Permit As noted, if a lot split is approved, the applicant intends to construct a single-family residential dwelling on the new parcel. Title 12-2-6(A) of the Code requires a wetlands permit for the construction, alteration, or removal of any structure within the 100 -foot wetland or water resource -related buffer area. In an effort to avoid another planning application approval process prior to applying for a building permit to construct the dwelling, Staff recommended the applicant seek approval of a wetlands permit in conjunction with the other requests. The purpose of the Wetlands Systems Chapter of the Code is to (Title 12-2-1): 1. Provide for protection, preservation, maintenance, and use wetlands and water resource -related areas; 2. Maintain the natural drainage system; 3. Minimize disturbance which may result from alteration by earthwork, loss of vegetation, loss of wildlife and aquatic organisms as a result of the disturbance of the natural environment or from excessive sedimentation; 4. Provide for protection of potable freshwater supplies; and 5. Ensure safety from floods. The subject parcel is located approximately 60 feet from a wetland and water resource -related area and is separated by 4' Avenue. The construction of a dwelling on newly -created parcel would have no negative page III impacts on the surrounding wetlands and water resource -related area. Staff would be supportive of a wetlands permit included as part of a revised, approved subdivision request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the proposed subdivision request and encourages the applicant to pursue other options outlined in this report or suggested by the Planning Commission. In addition, Staff recommends the variance request and wetlands permit application be withdrawn and included as part of a revised subdivision application submittal. If the Planning Commission desires to approve the entire application submittal, as proposed, the following conditions should be included: 1. The existing accessory structure is demolished, as noted on the survey included in the application submittal. 2. Park dedication fee in the amount of $2,700, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall dedicate 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front property lines and 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the side and rear property lines to be denoted on the map submitted to Dakota County. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. ACTION REQUESTED Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1. Recommend denial of the proposed subdivision request based on the attached findings of fact. '1 2. Recommend approval of the proposed subdivision and variance requests and wetlands permit based on the attached findings of fact, with conditions. 3. Table the request. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Aerial site map 2. Applications, including supporting materials 3. Site photos page 112 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL Subdivision Request for Lot Split 677 4' Avenue The following Findings of Fact are made in denial of the proposed request: 1. The proposed subdivision does not meet the side lot design standards of the Code. 2. The proposed side lot line configuration makes it difficult to accommodate the required drainage and utility easements and may create property boundary disputes in the future. 3. The applicant has other options for subdividing the subject parcel in compliance with the Code. 4. The existing detached garage can be demolished, which eliminates the need for a variance and facilitates a more appropriate subdivision of the subject parcel. page 113 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Subdivision Request of a Lot Split, Variance and Wetlands Permit 677 4' Avenue The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed request: 1. The proposed subdivision would create two parcels that are compliant with the R-1 Zoning District lot standards. 2. The proposed side lot line configuration is necessary to comply with the lot width requirements for the new parcel and setback requirements for the existing detached garage to remain on the subject parcel. 3. The existing detached garage is a legal nonconforming structure and pre -dates the recent Code amendment. 4. The proposed subdivision would allow the subject parcel to maintain the ability to contain a 1,000 -square foot detached garage with a conditional use permit. 5. The existing 1,084 -square foot detached garage structure meets the purposes and intent of the Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6. The construction of a dwelling on the new parcel would have no negative impacts on the surrounding wetland and water resource -related area. page 114 PLANNING CASE 2014-13 Source: Staff Figure 1: Existing Detached Garage EXHIBIT 1 Planning Case 2014-13 677 4th Avenue Date: 5/19/2014 0 70 SCALE IN FEET 69 City of T Mendota Heights L " Nw, 1 �< s► 4TH AVE �Netbas GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. MalU) 1 15 J i o 'al_, @* I 0 70 SCALE IN FEET 69 City of T Mendota Heights L " Nw, 1 �< s► 4TH AVE �Netbas GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. EXHIBIT 2 Planning Case 2014-13 �������� �« « -�unn Avenue [��tp' �J1�/�O1/1 ��`������� � � O 70 Tj "!%iii SCALE |NFEET | 'r` r ' n� 4TH AVE / ����,� ' AMR ���r��.����������)���.-� GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for atrue title search, property apprah»a|, p|at, eurvey, orfor zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heighte, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes noliability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of MendotaHeights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. EXHIBIT 3 Planning Case 2014-13 677 4th Avenue Date- 5/19/2014 0 70 SCALE IN FEET City of T a Mendota Heights x 1 Improved ROW to City Standards " 58 � �gp *g7l As 1 15 rnI �I� .-.. ._. 118 --I - --1f ' I , - ---- ------- � - `�. �•"'� �"�� ' 'tn"., � ., rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�e ���,. 15., qga I �b 59 69 — — — — — 132 I" - ; i 4TH AVE �i rF�� Ae`N WN rometrics GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Planning Case 2014-13 677 4th Avenue Date: 5/19/2014 U) J J Q Z R i �v 0 70 SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights s GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. page 119 April 21, 2014 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission and City Council 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights MN 55118 From: Ken Noack, Mary Kay Noack 6770 Ave Mendota Heights MN 55118 RE: Lot Split and Garage Variance Dear members of the Planning Commission and Council: We are requesting that you allow us to create a buildable lot on our property at 677 4 I Ave. (property ID276970307082) The property is large enough, and previously had a home on the same area as proposed. This is to allow our son and his family to move back to the property he grew up on. Our second request is to grant us a variance to allow the nonconforming detached garage to remain on our property after the lot split. (See attachments) Sincerely, Ken Noack Mary Kay Noack page 120 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651:452.8940 Fax www:mendota-f7eiglits:com CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Property Address/Street Location:. 7:2� ��y' AP, Applicant Name: K�- -„o c � /t/v,¢e'hone:� �% lS7 &g f IO Applicant E -Mail Address:ge �✓!"I i� a Applicant Mailing Address: (, >7 e17_77 /14/L - Property Owner Name: ,, ^18,0e/e— Phone: Property Owner Mailing Address: 52ZW;£ Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) a> 7 9n'3�`7 Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning Variance ❑ Subdivision Approval ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit Wetlands Permit ❑ Critical Area Permit qael of Split ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. y _16/_111 Signature of Applicatr Date Signature of Ownerl�� Date Signature of Owner (if more than one) Date Planning Application (modified 1/28/2014) Page 1 of 1 page 121 1101 Victoria Curve. I Mendota Heights. MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651:4518940 fax __ ��w�ti:mendota-hefgllts:co,m ,,,, CITY OF MENDO.TA HEIGHTS. WETLANDS PERMIT REQUEST Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. • If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller — only submit originals. • If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8'/2 x 11. • Any drawing in color — must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: ❑ Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). `) Letter of Intent. �jj k ❑ Full and adequate description of all phases of the operation and/or proposed physical changes. Nl ❑ Soil survey map of the proposed plat. )ff Topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals. v'114' ❑ Detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading, and landscaping. ❑ Site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the N 1 site. ❑ Information on existing drainage and vegetation of all land within the site. ❑ Time period for completion of development including timing for staging of development if A114- applicable. Wl A- ❑ Design specifications for all sediment and erosion control measures. Wetlands Permit Request (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 0 page 122 1161Victoria Curve I Mendota H69ht5, MN 35178 $51.452.1850 phone 1 WA5189,40'fax wwvJ.meiidota=tieigBts:com c1 r, .9r IVIENOOTA HEIGHTS VARIANCE CHECKLIST/QUESTIONNAIRE Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. A variance is a request to vary from the City of Mendota Heights zoning standards. Under Minnesota State Law, variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code and when consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning standards. "Practical difficulties," in regards to variance requests, has three parts: (1) the proposed use of the property is a reasonable; (2) unique circumstances exist on the property which are not created by the landowner; and (3) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Please consider these requirements carefully before requesting a variance. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. • If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller— only submit originals. • If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8 Y2 x 11. • Any drawing in color — must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. bM Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). Sketch plan showing all pertinent dimensions, and including the location of any easements having an influence upon the variance request. Letter of Intent. Please complete the attached questions regarding your request. Variance Checklist/Questionnaire (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 of 3 page 123 Please answer the following questions as they relate to the variance request. You may fill in this form or create your own. 1. In your opinion, does the proposal peat the property to use in a reasonable manner? IN YES ® NO vvny or why not? This garage has been on this family property and in continuous use since 1962. It is still needed and used for storage of antiques and equipment dating back to the original homestead in 1900. e. a -,ease aescrioe ine circumstances unique to the props not created by you). This garage was built at 1064 sq. feet out of cement blocks. It can't be moved or down sized to conform with the current City code. 3. In your opinion, will the variance, if granted, fit with the character of the neighborhood? YES ® NO vvny or why not? This garage has been in the neighborhood before most of the houses have been built. There are other detached garages near by at 665 & 662 4th ave, and a much larger pole bam at 723 3rd ave. This garage is in an older established neighborhood with very low density on 4th ave. (4 homes including ours) The Planning must makes an affirma$ivsa fndinn nn arr sof th® swit®rG� /icFenl above in order to grant a variance. The applicant for a variance has the burden of proof to shove that all of the criteria listed above have been satisfied. Variance Checklist/Quesdonnaire (modified 121612013) Page 2 of 3 page 124 Boundary and Location Survey for: KEN NOACK — — — — — — — — — — — at 677 4th Avenue — Mendota Heights, Minnesota f -- NB9'18'S9"E 134.25 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CML ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal DrM • Suite 110 • Eapaa• Miarrseola • Ph— (651) 152-5051 JOB: 144-2727.010 ` 8 M n � N 3 58922 4XW 70.35 1 M C4 N I I 0 10 20 b 50 IO $ems° Scale in Feet Uj IW S89919'13'W 114.00 VACATED ' ALLEY'WSHED,T7LLEGEND ' tiir� on Monument Found This swas prepared without the benefit of a title urvey commitmentAll easements of record maY not be shown. ro ° °S71NG ccE GnRnca B 50 I Q Z I >a 10 h Il iOUSE I N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 8 24 W xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I g 10 7 Bdit Sefbaek Orn I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1497 N 100.00 Dated this 24th day of February, 2014. — NDS �'4J E 2,9.27 T� REHDER &ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas 1. Adam, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43414 $ 4TH AVENUE $ Revised April 9, 2014 Rehder and Associates, Inc. CML ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal DrM • Suite 110 • Eapaa• Miarrseola • Ph— (651) 152-5051 JOB: 144-2727.010 Affidavit ®f Publication State of Minnesota SS County of Dakota page 125 ANNE THILLEN , being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printedNOTICE OF HEARING which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY , the 11TH day of MAY 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of ; 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 'abcdefghijklmnopq rstuwaxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me on th's 12TH day of MAY._, 20 BY: 0'4�. TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR Notary Public *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. TC?NYA R. WHITEHEAD VRATE INFORMATION Notary Public -Minnesota '+ My Commission E�xvpIres Jen 31, 2015 (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space............................................................... $25.00 per Col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ............................................. $25.00 per Col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter.......................................................... $ per Col. inch 1/14 page 126 page 127 Planning Case 2014-13 Public Hearing Notice Mailing List 276970304081 277120000040 1502 VANDALL ST 1509 DODD RD AGNES C TSTE MCCLUNEY DEAN S & BARBARA VERDOES 271470000121 271470000221 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 101 M 683 WENTWORTH AVE W W2 ALLEN & JUDITH WERTHAUSER ELIZABETH H GUTHMANN 277120000090 277120000080 1500 SOMERSET CT M 1490 SOMERSET CT ANDREW W & NANCY W LYNN ERIC C & LAURIE LYNN TOSTRUD 276970304020 678 3RD AVE S ANTON A BRUCKMUELLER 271470000091 1585 DODD RD 303 ARLENE W SONDAY 271470000061 1585 DODD RD 203 BROOKE D TSTE MORDY 271470000111 1575 DODD RD E2 BRUCE G TSTE ODLAUG 276970304040 666 3RD AVE CYRIL J B KOBBERMANN 277120000100 10 1505 SOMERSET CT DANIEL M & ELISHA G LOPEZ 277120000120 1485 SOMERSET CT FRANCIS & HELGA E PARNELL 271470000201 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 303 GAYLORD & RUTH TRST GLARNER 277120000110 1495 SOMERSET CT GEORGE H & MARCELLA KEYS 271470000211 695 WENTWORTH AVE W W1 HURON & LETICIA M SMITH 271470000151 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 202 JANET M KING 277120000070 1480 SOMERSET CT wmdw JAY & MARILYN BREMER 277120000130 275190001030 1475 SOMERSET CT Fn 1527 VANDALL ST DAVID W & PENNY L SCHILLING JEFF L & GAYLE E CLOSMORE Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning I inch = 305 feet verification. Oakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/7/2014 page 128 Page 2 271470000151 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 201 JOHN F JR & SHARON A DIEDRICH 271470000181 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 301 JOHN ] & DELORES J WOOD 276970104023 662 4TH AVE JOSEPH M ISAAC 276970104025 JOSEPH M ISAAC 276970307082 677 4TH AVE KENNETH ] & MARY KAY NOACK 271470000191 M 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 302 NANCY JARDINE 271470000021 1585 DODD RD 102 NANCY T TSTE FIELD 276970305080 1501 VANDALL ST OLIVER B & CAROL ] HANSON 271470000041 1585 DODD RD 201 PATRICIA A TSTE TINUCCI 276970103070 665 4TH AVE PAULI STANTON 275190001010 276970306101 1515 VANDALL PAUL J STANTON LOUIS S & MARGARET P LIZARRAGA 271470000171 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 203 MARK A GIORGINI REVOCABLE TRUST 5/26/9 271470000101 1595 DODD RD E1 MARY H COMMERS 276970104030 1565 DODD RD MARY L OFLAHERTY 276970305060 684 3RD AVE MY THREE SONS LLC 271470000071 M 1585 DODD RD 301 RAYMOND A & MARY LOU MCLEVISH 271470000011. 1585 DODD RD 101 RICHARD A JAMIESON 276970305100 ROBERT & KATHLEEN BONINE 276970305050 688 3RD AVE ROBERT & KATHLEEN BOVINE Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed, This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 305 feet 276970307041 277120000010 1516 VANDALL ST 661 4TH AVE ROBERT D BRADT THOMAS G & JUDITH STANTON 271470000081 271470000131 1585 DODD RD 302 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 102 ROBERT F & KAREN K GARLAND TIMOTHY R MCLEVISH 275190001020 271470000141 1521 VANDALL ST 0 689 WENTWORTH AVE W 103 ROBERT K GUENTHER TIMOTHY R MCLEVISH 271470000051 276970104024 1585 DODD RD 202 1549 DODD RD ROBERT L & MARY H TEMPLE TODD J ADRIAN 271470000031 277120000030 1585 DODD RD 103 1521 DODD RD RONALD P & HELEN J LIFSON WILLIAM D €k MICHELLE NIELSEN 277120000020 1533 DODD RD STEVEN J & KARLA J GOTHAM Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 304 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/7/2014