Loading...
1994-06-14 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION JUNE 14, 1994 - 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of May 10, 1994 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes, 4. Invitation for Joint Parks Committee's Picnic 5.. of Dakota County Park Policy Plan • Steve Sullivan, Dakota County Parks Department • 6:30 to 7:00 p.m. 6. Presentation of Development Proposal for Lebanon Hills Regional Park • John Forrest and Eric Evenson, Dakota County Office of Planning • 7:0.0 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 7. Capital Improvements Plan for Park System • Discussion of Final Draft CIP List • Recommendation to City Council 8. Landscape Architect for North Kensington Park • Appoint Parks Commissioner to Ad-Hoc Committee 9. Verbal Updates • Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks! • Monthly Report from Terry Blum • North Urban Trail • Archery Range at Friendly Marsh Park 10. Adjourn. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 10, 1994 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Spicer, Kleinglass, Libra, Norton and Linnell. Commissioner Katz had informed staff she would be late. Commissioner Damberg was excused. Also present were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander, Recreation Programmer Michelle Morgan and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Libra moved approval of the April 12, 1994 minutes with corrections. Commissioner Norton seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 RESERVATION REQUEST FOR KENSINGTON PARK Recreation Programmer Morgan explained that she has received a request to reserve Kensington Park for a graduation party on Tuesday, June 14, 1994. She stated she is seeking a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission on whether or not to issue this permit. She stated that she had request the Police Chief to review this request because of concerns with potential noise and parking problems _.o nearby residents. Morgan explained that Chief Delmont is concerned with possible noise and nuisance citations due to the live band, the possibility of uninvited guests, the inability to control the size of the crowd, parking and the mixing of high school students from rival high schools. Morgan stated Chief Delmont is extremely concerned about the resulting effect on the community and that the City has had serious problems every year with graduation parties that are held in homes and involve much fewer people than this request for a party. Morgan stated that Chief Delmont has requested that the Parks and Recreation Commission deny the request. Commissioner Norton stated she is concerned with the effects of a live band playing music in the park. She stated there are a number of homes near Kensington Park. Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 2 Mrs. Stillman, Mrs. Schactman and Mrs. Benke were present to discuss their request to reserve Kensington Park. Mrs. Benke stated the band members do not play hard rock music. Vice Chair Spicer stated there will be five families involved in this graduation party. He stated these kids have grown up together and that the parents want to include everyone at one party. He stated there will be no alcohol. Spicer stated the Police Chief has indicated there have been problems in the past where parties were held at a home. He stated that maybe there will be no problems with one big party at a park. He stated there will be roughly 200 people invited. He stated there has been discussion of hiring off duty police officers. Mrs. Stillman explained that the graduates will be from St. Thomas Academy and Sibley High School. She stated that these kids all have the same friends and their families are all inter-related. She stated they will be serving dinner and dessert. She explained that people will attend the party by invitation only. She stated that this was a simple idea generated by all of the families. She stated that she can understand the City's concerns. Vice Chair Spicer stated this group had request Kensington Park because of the two pavilions. He explained City staff suggested that an event such as this could better be served at Mendakota Park. He stated that there are double header softball games scheduled at Mendakota Park that night and that there just would not be enough parking and space available for all groups. He further stated that not everyone comes at once to an open house. He further suggested that a tim&limit be placed on the--playing time of the band. Commissioner Kleinglass inquired if Vice Chair Spicer is directly involved in planning the graduation party.- Vice Chair Spicer stated that his wife is and that he would remove himself as Vice Chair for this discussion. He further stated he would abstain from voting on this issue. This discussion was placed under Commissioner Kleinglass' direction. Commissioner Kleinglass inquired why Police Chief Delmont objects to this request. Recreation Programmer Morgan responded that the Chief has concerns based on past experience with graduation parties in the City. Morgan stated that the live band music is a real concern as Kensington Park is close to homeowners. Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 3 A brief discussion ensued regarding the use of Mendakota Park on June 14th and the times the softball games are held and the time of the graduation party. Commissioner Libra stated that these parks have been constructed to be used by its residents. He stated that limitations can be worked out between the parents and the City in allowing them to have this party at Kensington Park. In response to a question from Mrs. Stillman, Recreation Programmer Morgan stated that the police officers will most likely be dressed in uniform and that there is a fee charged. Commissioner Linnell stated that this request is a good idea and that Kensington Park is a public park. He stated that a band is apt to draw additional people and that limitations can be stipulated in order to allow this party to happen. Commissioner Norton stated that noise is an issue. She stated amplified noise is different than crowd noise. Norton stated the Commission should have consideration for the residents in the area. She stated the Commission should consider limiting the hours of play. A brief discussion ensued regarding changing the date of the graduation party and moving it to Mendakota Park. Recreation Programmer Morgan pointed out there are softball games played during all nights of the week at Mendakota Park. Commissioner Kleinglass stated the parents have requested to use Kensington Park on June 14 and that the Commission should not be changing the date and time of the graduation party. He suggested that no live music be played after 9:30 _P.M. and that off duty'police officers be hired. In ,,response to a question from the Commission, Morgan stated that Sibley Sting is not scheduled to use the soccer fields at Kensington on June 14. She stated she would contact Sue Hanson, of Sibley Area Sting, to verify that they are not playing on the night of the graduation party. Commissioner Norton moved to recommend that Council grant the request to reserve Kensington Park on June 14 from 6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. conditioned upon the following: 1. That the parents hire off duty police officers as directed by Police Chief Delmont; and 2. That no live music be played after 9:00 P.M.; and Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 4 3. That there be no alcohol served; and 4. That attendance be by invitation only. Commissioner Kleinglass seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: 1, SPICER MISCELLANEOUS MAYFIELD HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD TRAIL REQUEST Parks Project Manager Kullander explained that Mrs. Sargent, resident of the Mayfield Heights area, had briefly discussed with him, earlier in the day, the possibility of the City reconsidering the connection of a trail in the Mayfield Heights area to Douglas Road. Kullander stated he had suggested that Mrs. Sargent attend the Parks Commission meeting to discuss this issue further. Vice Chair Spicer briefly explained that this issue has been discussed three times previously. He stated the Parks and Recreation Commission had wanted to help the neighborhood in the past because it is an isolated area. He stated the City had difficulty in obtaining easements from the residents in the area. He stated that the City has no resources to purchase easement rights. Mrs. Sargent stated that the original owner of the property, were the easement could be obtained, has moved. She stated the City is currently building up the berm and she feels that the issue should now be revisited. Ms. Judy Phillips, 1670 Mayfield Heights, stated that some of the children in the area are getting old enough to use the Highway 13 to Victoria Road route but that this is not really a good alternative. She stated the children do find elicit ways of getting around the area. In response to a question from Commissioner Kleinglass, Parks Project Manager Kullander stated there is a holding pond in the area. Vice Chair Spicer stated that the Parks Commission had strongly supported the neighborhood but no neighbors volunteered easements. ( Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 5 Mrs. Phillips stated she wants the children in the neighborhood to access the trails safely. She stated she wants a healthy atmosphere for the children in the neighborhood. Commissioner Katz arrived at 7:06 o'clock P.M. Mrs. Phillips stated there have been five dogs hit in the neighborhood and that there is a real safety concern for children in the area. She stated there has been an informal easement created from Mayfield Heights Road to Douglas Road. She stated the owner of this property, who was not willing to give an easement, has now moved. Commissioner Norton stated that this is an important issue and that it should be reconsidered by the Parks and Recreation Commisison and the City Council. Mrs. Phillips stated that this is a safety issue. Commissioner Spicer stated there is not a lot the City can do at this point. He suggested that the neighbors get together and discuss this issue. It was the consensus of the Parks and Recreation Commission that the Mayfield. Heights neighborhood residents discuss this issue amongst themselves and determine -if the area residents are willing to volunteer easements to allow the connection of the trail to Douglas Road. The Commission directed staff to make past correspondence regarding the Mayfield Heights Trail request available to the residents of this neighborhood. CAPITAL - IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR PARK SYSTEM Parks Project Manager Kullander introduced this item by submitting a reduced version of the preliminary list of Capital improvements for the park system. Kullander stated the Parks and Recreation Commission should establish and review funding sources, priority of improvements, time lines, etc. Kullander asked the Commission if funding for ADA upgrades should come from the General Fund or Special Park Fund. The Commission agreed that the Special Park Fund was for new capitol improvements and that ADA mandated upgrades could come from the General Fund. Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 6 In response to a question from Commissioner Spicer, Kullander stated that Wentworth Park improvements had been given priority by the Commission at the April meeting over Ivy Park improvements because the Commission had designated Wentworth Park as the ADA park north of Highway 110. Kullander stated that safety improvements at Valley View Heights and Hagstrom King park need to be considered. He stated the play structures are not in compliance with Consumer Products Safety guidelines. He stated the guidelines were not adhered to when the structures were constructed. Chair Katz inquired on who maintains Valley View Heights tot lot. Kullander responded the City has been maintaining it because the neighborhood has not. Chair Spicer suggested that any unique improvements to the park system should be funded by the Special Park Fund. The Commission discussed using the General Fund for constructing picnic shelters at Wentworth and Friendly Hills Park. Kullander stated the Commission should determine what level of image should be considered in constructing these shelters. He stated if shelters are constructed similar to that of Kensington, the cost could be approximately $10,000 to $12,000. He stated a time line for constructing shelters in these two parks would be included in the CIP plan. Kullander inquired as to what type of fire pits are preferred at Roger's Lake Park. He stated two prefab pits cost approximately $600 and that masonry pit cost approximately $4,000 to $5,000. He stated this could be considered a maintenance item because grills originally located in the park have been removed for maintenance reasons. The Commission decided to replace the old grills with two fire pits. Kullander inquired if the Parks and Recreation Commission would like to provide sand volleyball at Mendakota Park. He stated sand volleyball is presently offered at Roger's Lake Park. He stated a sand volleyball court could cost approximately $4,000 to $5,000. Commissioner Libra inquired how much use Roger's Lake Park has in sand volleyball users. Kullander responded there is a league and that the City receives several requests to use the sand volleyball court. The Parks Commission was of the consensus to schedule the construction of a sand volleyball court at Mendakota Park as a low priority item, using Special Park Funds in later years. The Commission discussed irrigation expansion at Mendakota Park. Kullander explained that Parks Leadperson Blum had completed some irrigation work last year and he would like to Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 7 see more irrigation placed in the park (berm area) . Kullander stated additional irrigation could cost approximately $5,000 to $6,000. The Commission felt that this should be funded through the General Fund. Kullander explained that Parks Leadperson Blum would like to switch the warming house from Ivy Park to Wentworth Park sometime in 1994. Kullander stated that Wentworth Park skating rinks gets a lot of use and the current warming house is too small. Kullander stated that ADA improvements will need to meet (i.e. access, railings, ramps). The Commission was of the consensus that this should be funded through the General Fund. Kullander stated he had done some research regarding soccer bang boards for the Kensington soccer field. He stated the Commission should decide if they would like to see permanent or portable boards. He stated permanent boards will cost approximately $2,000 per bang board installation. Commissioner Libra stated the Commission should wait one year as the soccer program will be utilizing these fields for the first time this year. Commissioner Katz stated that permanent boards could become a real eye sore. Commissioner Libra stated that more sod is needed at Kensington Park as there are several muddy spots in the field._ Kullander inquired if the Commission is open to considering T- Ball fields at the public works facility. He stated there is open space near Medallion Drive and Lexington Avenue. He stated that possibly two backstops and ag -lime could be placed there. He stated the approximate cost could be $3,000. Commissioner Spicer inquired how soon this could be_done. Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that the City Council approve the installation of backstops and ag -lime at the Public works facility, using the Special Park Fund as the funding source with a cap of $2,500. Commissioner Norton seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Libra moved to direct staff to add more sod to the Kensington soccer field with an expenditure cap not to exceed $450. Commissioner Norton seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 8 The Commissioner directed Parks Project Manager Kullander to complete the CIP matrix of improvements to the park system and to present a draft copy at the June meeting for review. The Commission also asked for preliminary cost impacts of the CIP Plan. MISCELLANEOUS Commissioner Norton stated that the culvert in Valley Park has been sprayed with graffiti. She stated it is unsightly and she inquired how the public works crew can best remedy the problem. Parks Project Manager Kullander noted several ways to correct the problem. Norton stated she would like to see more information from the parks department regarding the amount of vandalism which occurs at the parks. Kullander stated the Parks and Recreation Commission could be kept better informed of any type of vandalism activity which occurs in the parks by requiring Parks Leadperson Blum to submit a monthly report. The Commissioners agreed that such a report would be very helpful. Commissioner Norton inquired if the trail in Valley Park is patrolled. Kullander responded no and that at one time, the Police Chief had considered purchasing bicycles for patrolling the area parks, trails and neighborhoods. DISCUSSION OF DRAFT DAKOTA COUNTY PARK POLICY PLAN Commissioner Norton stated that the public meeting scheduled for today May 10, 1994) to discuss the County's park policy plan is actually scheduled for May 17th. She stated that the Parks Commission should be involved in this process, "and that she encourages' the Commissioners to read the plan. She stated that she has heard some discouraging comments regarding changing of character and paving trails. She stated the City and County should be preserving the natural areas of the County park system. Commissioner Spicer suggested that Bob Doffing be invited to attend a Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to discuss this plan. Commissioner Norton directed staff to get a copy of the Draft Park Policy Plan and distribute it to the Commission. VERBAL UPDATES Parks Project Manager Kullander stated staff had received one application from the University of Minnesota Graduate School of Landscape Architecture for the project of designing the Parks and Recreation Commission May 10, 1994 Page 9 landscaping in North Kensington Park. Commissioner Linnell stated he has volunteered his time to work on this project along with a member from City staff and Councilmember Smith. Commissioner Spicer stated at their last board meeting, Mend- Eagan Athletic Association has requested that a member from City staff be in attendance for their monthly meetings. He stated that the board has requested Recreation Programmer Morgan to attend the meetings. He stated he would be in contact with Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding this issue. Commissioner Linnell informed the Parks and Recreation Commission that he had attended the recent joint workshop between the City Council and the Planning Commission regarding the Highway 55 corridor issue. He stated the Council and Commission have a lot of ideas regarding use in this area. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation Commission adjourned its meeting at 8:22 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary ( ) CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 10, 1994 To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A Subject: Invitation for Joint Parks Committee's Picnic DISCUSSION Attached please find a memorandum and invitation from Barb Schmidt, Parks Director for Dakota County, to attend a picnic with Dakota County and all the municipalities at Schaar's Bluff picnic area in Spring Lake Park Reserve located at 127 St. E. and Idell Ave. The picnic is scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 21, 1994. (Please see attached map.) The County desires to bring together the various Parks and Recreation Commissions throughout Dakota County in a social setting to meet and establish dialogue. They are asking that each community designate a Commissioner to make a short five minute presentation on the city's park system and development plans. All Commissioners and staff are invited and R.S.V.P's should be made by Friday, June 17th to Deb Peters, Dakota County Park office at 437-6608. Box lunches and soft drinks will be provided. ACTION REQUIRED Interested members should RSVP by Friday, June 17. The Commission should choose a representative to provide a short presentation for Mendota Heights. MEMORANDUM DAKOTA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 8500 - 127111 STREET EAST HASTINGS, MN 55033 612- 437 -6608 TO: Park Director FROM: Barb Schmidt, Parks Director DA'Z'E: May 19, 1994 SUBJECT: Invitation for Joint Parks Committee's Picnic Please forward the attached information to your Parks Committee Chair. Thanks for your assistance. BS /sw O:M060994A DAKOTA COUNTY 8500 127TH STREET EAST - HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 PARKS DEPARTMENT (612) 437 -6608 Dear Parks Committee Chair: May 12, 1994 The Dakota County Park and Recreation Advisory Committee (PARAC) was established in June of 1993 to advise the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on park related matters. PARAC members have spent the last several months becoming familiar with the County Parks and working on a Park Policy Plan which deals with selected strategic issues and is being recommended to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. PARAC is interested in becoming more familiar with the goals, objectives and philosophies of the municipal park systems in Dakota County. PARAC members would like to establish current dialogue with other park and recreation committee members on our respective roles in the provision of park facilities and recreation services. To that end, PARAC is hosting an information - sharing picnic at 5:00 P.M. June 21, 1994 at the Schaar's Bluff picnic area in Spring Lake Park Reserve (127 St. E and Idell Ave). Enclosed is our All Park's brochure which features a map showing the location of the park. Area Park Committee Members and park staff are invited to attend. It would be helpful if one person could be designated from each committee to make a short five minute presentation on the agency's park system and immediate and long range development plans. Park brochures to share with the group would also be appreciated. Please RSVP to Deb Peters, at the Dakota County Park office, 437 -6608 by Friday, June 16, 1994 so that box lunches and soft drinks can be provided for everyone in attendance. I look forward to meeting with you and beginning a relationship to facilitate our cooperative efforts to address the recreational needs of our rapidly expanding population. Sincerely, Bill Holton, Chair cc: City Parks Director Enc: Printed on Recycled Paper AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER the focal point of this park where you can er ski and picnic. The 1,490 acre reservoir 1 water in the metropolitan area, south of Mississippi Rivers. Those wishing to stay the campsites along the reservoir's edge. In the midst of the fully developed portion of Northern Dakota County, Thompson County Park provides an easy escape into solitude. Large oak trees shade the picnic areas that overlook Thompson Lake. A short multi-use trail follows the lake e meanders through the rolling wooded hills and grassy art. The two-story pavilion is available for rental year round for picnics, parties and meetings. Inver Grove Heights THOMPSON COUNTY PARK SPRING LAKEPARK RESERVE THOMPSON COUNTY PARK LAKE BYLLESBY REGIONAL PARK CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 10, 1994 To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As Subject: Presentation of Dakota County Park Policy Plan DISCUSSION The Parks and Recreation Commission will recall that at the May meeting, and executive summary of the Dakota County Park Policy Plan was reviewed and discussed. Since that time copies of the full Park Policy Plan have been received and the County's Parks Department has offered to provide a presentation on the plan. Mr. Steve Sullivan, Dakota County Parks Department, will be present to provide a twenty minute presentation and answer questions that the Commission may have about Dakota County's plan. On a related issue, at the recent Joint City Council - Planning Commission workshop, the idea of approaching Dakota County ( about a possible County park (on the Western Ressurrection Cemetery site) in Mendota Heights was discussed. Staff has contacted Dakota County about this issue and the Commission may wish to discuss this with Mr. Sullivan. Also attached, please find a copy of the City of Inver Grove Heights response to Dakota County on the Policy Plan. Mr. Bruce Anderson, Parks Director at Inver Grove Heights, raises a number of issues including acquisition and development of new County parks that may be of interest to Mendota Heights and northern Dakota County. ACTION REQUIRED Meet with Mr. Sullivan and discuss the Dakota County Park Policy Plan. Provide any appropriate direction to staff or any recommendations to the City Council. DAKOTA COUNTY DIVISION OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE DEPARTMENTS OF - • ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • HIGHWAYS • PARKS • SURVEY • OFFICE OF PLANNING LOUIS J. BREIMHURST, P.E. DIRECTOR (612) 891 -7005 FAX (612) 891 -7031 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 -857: TO: Park Directors and Interested Parties FROM: Eric Evenson, County Physical Development Planner DATE: June 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the "Dakota County Park Policy Plan." The Dakota County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing to receive comments regarding the proposed "County Park Policy Plan" on: Tuesday, July 19, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. in the BoardRoom, Dakota County Administration Center, 1590 West Highway 55, Hastings, MV lnnesota. Written comments are welcome and will be presented as part of public testimony. Written comments must be received no later than July 15, 1994. Comments may be sent to: Eric Evenson Dakota County Office of Planning Dakota County Western Service Center '14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Enclosed is the Executive Summary of the "Park Policy Plan." If you would like to receive a complete copy of the plan, please contact the County Office of Planning (612- 891- 7030). AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER DAKOTA COUNTY PARK POLICY PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Park Policy Plan defines the overall policy and direction for growth of Dakota County Parks, based on a mission to "provide for the protection and preservation of land in its natural state while providing for outdoor, natural resource oriented recreation activities". The Policy Plan is an update for a park planning document originally completed in 1970, expanded in 1975, and refined in 1982. It sets general policies that apply to all County Parks and to County - administered Regional Trails which are regarded as linear parks. The County Park System provides only a portion of the recreational facilities in the County. The State, cities, townships, schools, private operators, and other groups also provide recreational opportunities. Local park system's service areas tend to be population -based and focus on traditional activities to serve the particular needs of a neighborhood or a community. County parks are natural resource -based and focus on providing facilities and recreational uses that are suited for large- acreage, natural resource settings and focus on activities of regional.. • Dakota County currently manages the following parks and regional trails: Lebanon Hill Regional Park Lake Byllesby Regional Park Spring Lake Park Reserve Miesville Ravine Park Reserve (undeveloped) Thompson County Park Regional Trail System (undeveloped) The Policy Plan.describes the development, acquisition status and bikeway linkage for each park. City park facilities are their linked with County Parks in a trends and needs assessment. The assessment identifies a future need for swimming, camping, and fishing facilities. Strategic issues for policy formation are portioned into eight categories, each with an accompanying strategic issue question. 1) Park System Finance Policies - The increasing use of the County Park System is placing pressure on existing financial resources. This issue is compounded by current efforts to encourage more usage of County Parks and attempts to complete the development and acquisition of parkland. With increasing pressure on financial resources, what approach should be taken on future funding? Park Development Policies - What is the appropriate level and type of development for Dakota County Parks? 3) Park Design Standards - The standards for parkland and facility development may be based on differing expectations and objectives. These differing standards may result in conflicts regarding developmental type, extent, compatibility and quality. The establishment of comprehensive design standards will insure quality of service while optimizing both development and operational costs. Should the County establish fundamental standards for parkland and facility development? 4) Parkland Acquisition Policies - Approximately 20 percent of County parkland has not yet been acquired. What approach should the County take to acquire the remaining parcels within the County Park System? 5) Park Security & User Assistance - What elements are necessary for the Park Patrol to effectively carry out its duties? 6) Natural Resource Management - What natural resource management components are important in County Parks? 7) Performance Measures - How can the effect and quality of service provided by County Parks be effectively measured and monitored? DAKOTA COUNTY PARK POLICY PLAN 8) Inter - governmental Cooperation - What needs to be done to improve the coordination of park services with cities, townships, and other government agencies? Strategic Issue Policy Recommendations are summarized as follows: A) Park System Finance Policies In tight budget situations, priorities for funding are as follows: - Maintain park user safety Maintain existing park facilities and natural resources - New acquisition - New developments and natural resource enhancement initiatives Provide new recreational services /programs. County property taxes will remain the primary source of funding for operation and maintenance of the Dakota: County Park system. However, Dakota County must aggressively evaluate fee and other sources of 'funding which will supplement property tax revenues 'in order to keep up with the growing demand tot park services. The County will also aggressively seek regional funding for acquisition and development of - regional park facilities. Finally, it is recommended that the Board of Commissioners fully fund the Park Acquisition and Development Reserve at the level of $1 million, transferring $775,000 from the . . undesignated balance of the Park Fund for this purpose. This action would increase the flexibility of the Board for new acquisitions and developments. B) Park Development Policies Park development efforts will be focussed only on development within the boundaries of existing parks and proposed trail corridors that are compatible with the County park mission statement. C) Park Design Standards Dakota County will embark on an effort to establish design standards to be used for parkland and facility improvements. These standards will incorporate elements to promote user friendliness, high quality of service, operational and maintenance efficiency, appropriate visual image, and compatibility with the site and the overall natural environment. D) Parkland Acquisition Policies If Dakota County wishes to complete parkland acquisition within the next 10 to 20 years, a three -part strategy is recommended: - Purchase land froth willing sellers or use of eminent domain to acquire land holdings that interfere with park development, use, maintenance, or security. Establishment of pa sunset date for each County Park, wherein all land within the park boundary will be under County ownership within 10 to 20 years. More effective control of future development with tools such as an official mapping ordinance which would require Zoning Board of Adjustment approval for building permits within the park boundary. It is further recommended that additional County Parks or park facilities outside of existing park boundaries or proposed regional trail corridors not be established until acquisition of land within existing County Parks is completed. E) Park Security and User Assistance Dakota County will strive to protect life and property of park users, County Park property, and natural resources within parks. County Park Patrol responsibilities will include user assistance, enforcing the County Park Ordmance, deterring crime and maintaining order. Law enforcement in County parks will be the responsibility of appropriate law enforcement agencies (local police, County Sheriff). F) Natural Resource Management Dakota County is committed to the protection of soils, water, and significant landforms in its parks. More active management of park vegetation will restore native landscapes and preserve vegetation diversity. The DAKOTA COUNTY PARK POLICY PLAN County will work with natural resource management, organizations on improved fish and wildlife management, and to make natural resource education an important focus of the park activities program. G) Performance Measures Performance measurement tools such as, household surveys, user surveys, and trained observers will be utilized to monitor the performance of Dakota County's provision of recreational services to the public. The County desires to measure how well it is making uses of funds and meeting public expectations. H) Inter - governmental Cooperation Dakota County shall strive to cooperate with its communities to provide recreational facilities that are complementary to those provided by other levels of government and in accordance with the stated mission of the County Park System. Finally, strategic analysis of policy interrelationships reveal the following major conclusions: • Since the County has little direct control over how regional park funds are allocated, the County must be prepared to increase local support of parks if it wishes to have high quality parks in the future. - The recommended development policy is pivotal to how most other park policies are implemented, and reflects the Park Mission Statement, focusing park development on natural resource oriented facilities, which the County has the most skill and experience at providing. • An accelerated schedule for parkland acquisition will provide long -term savings, ensure the integrity of park boundaries, and enhance park development and security. Continued inter - governmental cooperation is a key element in future park security and the overall quality`of recreational opportunities in Dakota County. The system plan is based on commitment to providing a high quality level of service to a rapidly expanding user population. Increased user needs require increased funding and staffing. Background information and the rationale for these recommended policies are contained in the complete Park Policy Plan. You, the reader, are encouraged to review the entire planning document to gain a thorough understanding of the issues. The County Park and Recreation Advisory Committee was extensively involved throughout the process of plan preparation and review. The Park Policy Plan represents a positive step toward focusing on County Park issues and setting a more clear direction for the future acquisition, development, and management of Dakota County's parks. Reviewed and recommended for approval by the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee on April 12, 1994. City of INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 8150 BARBARA AVENUE • INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55077 • TELEPHONE May 18, 1994 Mr. Louis J. Breimhurst, P.E., Director Dakota County Division of Physical Development 14955 Galaxy Ave. Apple Valley, MN 55124 -8579 Dear Mr. Breimhurst: (612) 450 -2500 This is just a short note to follow up on the brief presentation on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, of the proposed Dakota County Park Policy Plan. It is my understanding that you will be conducting a future public hearing on the proposed plan and that additional public input will be welcomed from the general public, local City Councils and Parks and Recreation Commissions. First oft I commend you and your planning staff for taking on this project and your efforts to date: The following comments reflect my own personal/professional judgment and do not reflect any formal City position. It is my understanding that County staff define the park policy plan as a separate and different document than a comprehensive park plan. The park policy plan is more a short range (5 to 10 year) system plan as contrasted to a long range planning document. I believethat.there is a strong need for the County to prepare a comprehensive" park plan which identifies a clear vision of the County's park system. Specific major issues that I feel need to be considered include development of a regional swimming facility, future status of Buck Hill or other skiing facilities, expansion of other special use facilities, such as golf courses, ice arenas, nature centers, horseback riding facilities, etc. I believe it is the role of the County to provide recreational facilities that can not be afforded due to either economics or demographics on a local or municipal level. I do not suggest that all of the aforementioned items would be appropriate County amenities, but I do believe some type of planning and/or vision statement should be prepared that would address the development of regional facilities, beyond park preserves.. Although I am relatively new to Dakota County, it has been my observation that the County Park System is land rich and people poor. I would suggest the Park Policy Plan address the need to increase participations in the County Park System through programming, marketing and public relations .efforts. _ Possible programming ideas might include music in the parks, special event programming, family events . and community and County celebrations. The issue of fees and charges has long been debated within the Parks and Recreation profession. It is my understanding that the County staff is proposing that no permit or daily fees shall be charged for the use of Dakota County Parks. I admire your strong stance on this issue and philosophically, support the - concept. I do question whether or not , in this day and age, if the County can afford to not charge a daily use fee similar to other regional park systems. I hope that the issue of fees and charges and assessing a daily fee is discussed at some length by the County Board, with the understanding that the general fund must then provide adequate tax dollars for maintenance and annual a3pitol improvement projects, in lieu of daily revenue receipts. Page 2 (cont.) Mr. Breimhurst The last issue that I would like to raise centers around the County position that you will not pursue acquisition or development of any projects until the five proposed County parks are acquired. Again, I think this may be a good policy position, but I hope there will be some built in flexibility should other options arise. It would be too simplistic to just say, we will not consider acquisition and development of any projects until acquisition of all in- holdings are complete. There needs to be some flexibility in a long range plan that permits County policymakers to consider any and all options. I will be sharing the proposed County Park plan with the Inver Grove Heights Parks and Recreation Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting in June. The Parks and Recreation Commission will then provide a recommendation to the City Council, which I will forward on to County staff. I appreciate the opportunity to review your plan. Should you have any questions regarding my thoughts, feel free to contact myself directly at 450 -2587. rely, ru ' .. . erson, Di ector Parks and Recreation c: Dakota` - . unty Parks and Recreation Directors James G. Willis, City Administrator Barb'Schmidt, Dakota County Parks Director BKA:nv CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 10, 1994 To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative nt Subject: Presentation of Lebanon Hills Regional Park Development Proposal DISCUSSION Dakota County currently has plans for development of Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Dakota County has met with the Cities of Eagan and Apple Valley on this issue and have offered to meet with the City of Mendota Heights to present their proposal and involve our Park officials in the discussions. Mr. John Forrest and Mr. Eric Evenson, of the Office of Planning will be present to provide a short presentation of the proposed developments in Lebanon Hills Regional Park and to answer questions. Regional parks rely on funding from the Metropolitan Council and the State of Minnesota as one of their funding sources. Dakota County applies for funds through these agencies as the annual state budget is adopted and priorities for metropolitan regional park improvements are set. The Commission may wish to discuss the funding for this park with Mr. Forrest and Mr. Evenson. ACTION REQUIRED Meet with Mr. Forrest and Mr. Evenson and discuss the proposed development plan for Lebanon Hills Regional Park. Provide any appropriate direction to staff or any recommendations to the City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 10, 1994 To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A ant Subject: Capital Improvements Plan for Parks System Review of Final Draft INTRODUCTION The Parks and Recreation Commission has been involved with discussions of capital improvements, infrastructure, maintenance needs and replacement items in the parks system since July of 1993. Every park, trail and open space component of the system has been reviewed and recommendations have been made on priorities in the system and funding sources. Based on this year long process, a final draft of the Parks System Capital Improvements Plan has been prepared for your review and recommendation to City Council, DISCUSSION The Parks and Recreation Commission should be commended for its patience, perseverance and attention to detail throughout this year long process. A thorough review of the parks, open space and trail system involves many details and conflicting priorities. The commission should carefully review the enclosed final draft, five year CIP document to make sure that there are no items that have been inadvertently left out. (Please see attached draft CIP.) At the April 12, 1994 meeting, the Commission identified the high priority items that they felt were most important. They are: 1. New tennis court at Hagstrom King Park 2. Replace wood bridges at Wentworth Park 3. ADA modifications to Wentworth Park play equipment 4. Enlarge the ice skating rink at Friendly Hills Park The tennis courts, play equipment and ice skating rink are included in the expenditures proposed for 1994. Replacing the wood bridges at Wentworth Park has been included in the proposed expenditures for 1995. As staff prepared the final draft CIP, the old discussion of what are the appropriate categories for funding (general fund vs. special park fund) came up again. Staff has taken the approach that the general fund is the appropriate place for items considered to be repair, maintenance or replacement of existing facilities. The special park fund has been considered the appropriate place for any "new" facilities or upgrades with the referendum fund being the appropriate place for any new facilities or upgrades that are related to the intent of the referendum (ie. - improvement of neighborhood parks such as enlarging Friendly Hills skating rink). This coincides with the majority of the Commission's recommendations as we went through this year long process, however, there are some exceptions. ADA upgrades or requirements have been categorized as "new" facilities and have therefore been proposed for Special Parks Fund. This is generally consistent with the Commission's preference. The Commission should discuss the intent and purpose of the Special Parks Fund. (Please see attached Resolution No. 73 -18 establishing the Special Parks Fund.) The following chart is provided to demonstrate the spread of the fiscal impact of the CIP by funding category and year. General Special Referendum Total 1994 $22- 27,300 $ 71,650 $93- 98,950 1995 $24- 37,400 $22- 28,100 $ 5,500 $51- 71,000 1996 $20- 22,350 $12- 18,000 0 $32- 40,350 1997 $ 22,200 $ 7- 10,000 0 $29- 32,200 1998 :. $13- .15,200 $ 1,500 0 $14- 16,700 1999 $ 20,525 $ 4,000 0 $ 24,525 Totals $99,725 to $68,500 to $ 77,150 $ 245,375 to $117,675 $88,900 $ 283,725 The spread of the funding among funding categories and years is important because of the fiscal impact that will be created in the annual budgeting. The impact of the general fund items will be of particular concern to the City Council. This draft capital improvement plan does not include possible large equipment items that the Parks Department will be advocating for, such as- trucks and mowers which will compete with the capital improvement items for Council's attention. At the April meeting, the question was asked if the Council would approve everything in a CIP that the Commission adopts. The answer was that the real intent of a Capital Improvement Plan is to provide a guide and reference for the annual budget process and that annually each capital improvement line item will need budget approval. It is intended that this document serve as a working document for Parks Commission and Parks Department to use for budgeting and it should be updated annually. Successful budgeting will allow the City to preserve and enhance the parks system. RECOMMENDATION With this in mind, I suggest that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that City Council acknowledge the proposed five year Capital Improvements Plan as a working guide and budget document that is intended to recognize the needs of the parks system and to ensure its preservation. ACTION REQUIRED Discuss the proposed five year Capital Improvements Plan and make a recommendation to City Council. MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1994 PARK/ITEM 1. 14 Parks or facilities - Safety & Regulatory Signage 2. Landscape plantings for land dedication at Ivy Park 3. Grade Swales and Ice area to drain 4. Upgrade Wentworth Park play equipment. Add accessible elements. Handicap park north of Highway 110 5. Rgplace wood bridge in Valley Park with steel and wood bridge. Council approved 1993. 6. Connect hard court to street or trail in Rogers Lake and Friendly Hills Parks. ADA upgrade. ( )7. Repair rybberized play surface at Mendakota Park Safety issue 8. Enlarge free skating rink - add lights and poles as necessary at Friendly Hills Park & ADA lmproements 9. Improvements to North Kensington Park 10. Install 2 grills in South Kensington Park 11. Construct tennis court at Hagstrom King Park 12. Sod for repairs at Kensington soccer fields Proposed 1994 Expenditures DRAFT GENERAL FUND SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM See 1994 City Budget $300.00 $10-15,000 $10,000.00 $2,000.00 $22 to $27,300 $5,700.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $25,000 $600.00 $35,000.00 $450.00 NOTE: The only expenditure listed in this document that has been approved by Council is item #5 for calender year 1994. $ 71,650 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1995 pg 1 1. Switch /relocate warming houses at Ivy and Wentworth Parks. Make ADA improvements such as ramps, railings and pathway. Remove excess poles and lights at Ivy Park. 2. Develop wildflower planting areas in 4 parks Valley, Copperfield V -H, Marie 3. Install 2 benches near pond in Ivy Park 4. Install concrete bleacher pads in two parks 5. Construct rock landscape wall at berm near south entrance to park 6. Develop, print, distribute and display park & trail maps - 11 locations 7. Construct enclosures for Port - A- Poties in two parks 8. Construct enclosures for Port-A- Potie in Mendakota Park. Upgrade materials to match existing structures 9. Wildflower maintenance & expansion 10. Enhance trees and landscape plantings in two parks per year 11. Resurface tennis court at Rogers Lake Park 12. Replace 3 wood bridges with culverts or steel bridges - safety and ADA issue DRAFT GENERAL FUND SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $300.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 $12 to 25,000 $6,000.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,500.00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1995 pg 2 13. Install 2 grills in Wentworth Park 14. Reroof shelter in Valley Park 15. Repaint hard court in Rogers Lake Park & Friendly Hills Park 16. Replace 2 of 5 benches in Rogers Lake Park 17. Resurface basketball court at Mendakota Park 18. Eq large ballfield warning track. One per year - 5 total 19. Replace trees at Mendakota Park 20. Replace two grills removed/damaged in Rogers Lake Park )21. Construgt picnic shelter in Wentworth Park Proposed 1995 Expenditures GENERAL FUND SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $600.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $700.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $600.00 $12 to 18,000 $24,400 to 37,400 $22 to 28,100 $5,500.00 ( ) MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1996 Enhance tree and landscape plantings in two parks 2. Wildflower maintenance 3. Enclosures for Port-A-Poties in two parks 4. Concrete bleacher pads in two parks 5. Reroof shelter in Rogers Lake Park 6. Paint/stain structures in Mendakota Park 7. Replace 1 of 5 benches in Rogers Lake Park 8. Resurface tennis court in Ivy Falls Park 9. Modify tennis court fence opening to meet AD,A at Wentworth Park 10. Replace wood bridge with bit. walkway in Rogers Lake Park 11. Resurface trail thru Rogers Lake Park 12. Enlarge warning track one per year - 5 total - 13. Reshape gravel trails in Friendly Marsh Park and Copperfield Ponds 14. Resurface Lexington Ave. trail 15. Construct picnic shelter in Friendly Hills Park Proposed 1996 Expenditures GENERAL FUND $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2 to 4,000 $350.00 $3,500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00— $3,000.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $20 to 22,350 DRAFT SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $12 to 18,000 $12 to 18,000 $0.00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1997 Enhance tree and landscape plantings in two parks 2. Wildflower maintenance and expansion 3. Enclosures for 2 Port-A-Poties 4. Concrete bleacher pads in two parks 5. Paint/stain structures at Kensington Park 6. Resurface tennis court at Marie Park 7. Cqnstruct two wayside rest areas with benches in Valley Park 8. Replace two of 5 benches in Rogers Lake Park 9. Expand sprinkler system at Mendakota Park 10. Enlarge warning track 3rd of 5 total 11. Seal coat trail in Valley View Heights. Park 12. Seal coat Mendota Heights Road Delaware to Dodd 13. Upgrade play equipment ill Hagstrom King Park ADA & Safety Proposed 1-997 Expenditures GENERAL FUND $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,500.00 $700.00 $6,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 $22,200.00 AFT SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $2,000.00 $5 to 8,000 $7 to 10,000 - $0.00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Expenditures Proposed for 1998 Enhance trees and landscape plantings in two parks 2. Maintain and expand wildflower plantings 3. 4. Enclosures for 2 Port-A-Poties Concrete bleacher pads at two locations 5. Resurface tennis court at Friendly Hills Park 6. Install two horseshoe pits at Rogers Lake Park 7. Enlarge warning track at Mendakota Park 4 of 5 8. 9. Repair/replace rubberized surface at Mendakota Park Restripe parking lot at Kensington Park (every 5 years) 10. Enhance tree plantings at Kensington Park 11. ADA upgrades to Marie Park warming house Proposed 1998 Expenditures DR FT GENERAL FUND SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $500.00 $3 to 5,000 $200.00 _ $500.00 $2,000.00 $13 to 15,200 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK SYSTEM FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ( Expenditures Proposed for 1999 1. Enhance trees and landscape plantings in two parks 2. Wildflower maintenance and expansion 3. Enclosures for 2 Port-A-Poties 4. Concrete bleacher pads in 2 parks 5. Resurface tennis courts in Wentworth Park 6. Resurface (seal coat) 8 park parking lots 7. Restripe 8 parking lots and hard courts 8. Seal coat trails in Ivy Park, Mendakota Park, Friendly Hills Park and Hagstrom King Park 9. Modify/upgrade play equipment to meet ADA in Valley Park 10. Enlarge warning track at Civic Center Field last of 5 fields Proposed 1999 Expenditures GENERAL FUND $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,800.00 $1,225.00 $7,000.00 $500.00 $20,525.00 DR \F SPECIAL PARK REFERENDUM $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 a Mendota Heights • Parks System Chic Cents Lexington & Trunk Highway DO Friendly HI lit Pueblo Lane & Apache Prieud4y March Liuyenne Lane Ragthom Ring Mendota Heights Road Pad of Huber Drive Ivy Hills Park Butler Avenue & Mapte Park Drive Kennington Stockbridge & Concord Way Marie Park Between Victoria & Lexington Mtndakota Park Dodd Road & Mendakata Drive Rogers Lalb Wagon Wheel TraO Sibley Park Marie & Delaware Avenue 'Cagey Park Bast of 1BSE on Marie Avenue ' Victoria Highlands Victoria & Douglas Road Wentworth Wentworth Avame AtAAPOIN MUT IVY HILLS IMQIOX AT I.*md augur Cn+ We0TWOIOr ATM VICTORIA HIGHLANDS Poi as two 1100aw Ito tt� SIBLEY ATHLETIC COMPLEX CIVIC CENTER BALL FIELD axa0WAT flt :Op anal Oats, FRIENDLY MARSH ROGERS LAKE MENDAKOTA WA0011 Warn TIM ROGERS LAKE FRIENDLY HILLS II OITA aCORTI 1000 KENSINGTON C0[MAOWAT ***.:t:.;'■7 Village of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 23./X RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SPECIAL PARK FUND WHEREAS, under the provisions of Ordinance No. 2 as amended, it is provided that as a condition of the approval of a subdivision or plat, the developer may be required to contribute an amount equal to ten per cent of the undeveloped land value of the property sub- ject to said plat or subdivision, and WHEREAS, under the applicable state statutes, it is provided that said funds be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition of lands for parks and playgrounds, development of existing park and playground sites, and debt retirement in connec- tion with land previously acquired for parks and playgrounds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLV1D by the Village Council of the Village of Mendota Heights, Minnesdota, as follows: 1) That there is hereby established a Special Park fund into which all cash contributions received by the Village for parks and playgrounds under the provisions of Ordinance No. 2 as amended shall be held iseassilaprial and that the funds in said Special Park Fund shall be used only ' for the acquisition of land for parks and playgrounds, , development of existing park and playground sites, and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired by the Village for 'parks and playgrounds. Adopted 10 the Village Co ncil of the Village of Mendota Heights 1973. this 4__ day of ATT T: )1 I( / A400, :IA.. JA Gilbert M.abaugh Village Clerk VILLAGE COUNCIL VILLAGE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By ce Donald L. Huber Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 10, 1994 To: Parks and Recreation Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass]. Subject: North Kensington Park - Landscape Architect/Park Design DISCUSSION In March and April, the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed concept plans for North Kensington Park following a neighborhood meeting with residents of the area. A "backyard concept" with landscaping was the consensus decision with a budget of $20,000 to $25,000 for a basic park design with an enpanced plan that might include a shelter for an additional $10,000 to $15,000. The City Council, at its April 5, 1994 meeting, directed staff to advertise for landscape design services at the University of Minnesota's College of Landscape Architecture. This was done and the City received an application from Ms. Joni Giese, a third year student in the Master of Landscape Architecture program. Ms. Giese was interviewed by myself and Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager, in May. Ms. Giese has previous experience with municipalities having worked as a research assistant with the U of M's Landscape Study Center.in designing a master plan for a park in Sandstone, MN. She also has completed a landscape design and construction project for St. Lawrence Parish Courtyard. In addition to her landscape design skills, Ms. Giese possesses public presentation skills and is eager to work the Commission and Council; (See attached resume.) At the June 7' 1994 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a contract for approval at the June 21, 1994 meeting. The Council also agreed that an ad-hoc committee consisting_of one Council member, one Parks Commissioner, Mr. Kullander and myself be formed to meet with her during her concept design work prior to the approval stages. They chose Council member Jill Smith for this committee. Assuming approval of the contract with Ms. Joni Giese, the intent is to have concept plans prepared for the July Parks meeting with draft final plans for review at the August Parks meeting. ACT/ON REQUIRED The Commission should chose a member to work with the ad-hoc committee on the preparation of landscape design plans for North Kensington Park. 5445 29th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55417 April 28, 1994 Mr. Kevin Batchelder 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Batchelder: This letter is in response to a notice placed in the University of Minnesota Landscape Architecture Newsletter. I would like to express my interest and desire to work with the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council in designing North Kensington Park. As my resume shows, my previous research assistant positions and volunteer design work has provided me with the opportunity to work along with community and committee members to assess programmatic needs, develop design goals and refine conceptual designs into final plans. I have found these collaborative projects to be quite enjoyable experiences where both the community members and 1 leam substantial amounts from each other. In addition, my work at St. Lawrence Parish has given me the chance to specify plants and various construction materials. Presently, I am completing my third year of design course work. The strongest skills that 1 could provide your community include fresh-eyes to assess the parks and surrounding community's unique qualities from which to built upon, the development and presentation of potential design alternatives that might otherwise be overlooked, and finally, the rendering of graphics and/or construction of models to help community members visualize the design being considered. Enclosed please find a copy of the Robinson Park Master Plan final report written for the City of Sandstone and slides showing samples of my work. Unfortunately, I have not yet assembled a portfolio, but I would be glad to meet with you to show you sample&of my actual work. If I can provide you with any additional information, please feel free to call me at 729-0967. Thank you for considering my application. Sincerely, VAL CX. Joni L Giese JONI L. GIESE 5445 29th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55417 (612) 729 -0967 EDUCATION University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota September 1991 to present GPA 4.0 Working toward a Master of Landscape Architecture degree WORK EXPERIENCE Mankato State University, Mankato, Minnesota B.S., Accounting GPA 3.9 University of Minnesota, Department of Landscape Architecture Research Assistant June 1992 to present Various positions working on faculty research projects relating to such subjects as micro dimatic variations based on slope orientation; the economic, ecological and social impacts of alternative residential development styles. Currently studying the correlation between various residential street styles and safety. Teaching Assistant • March 1993 to June 1993 Assisted instructor of a technically based course with students' questions regarding assignments and corrected students' work Research Assistant June 1992 to October 1992 Worked with community members from the City of Sandstone, Minnesota to develop a conceptual master plan for a city park. Duties included development and presentation of the site analysis, alternative design concepts, and the final conceptual plan=to community members. Compiled a final report documenting the design development SL Lawrence Parish Courtyard, Minneapolis, Minnesota Volunteer Project June 1992 to September 1993 Worked with parish committee to develop goals and refine a final plan. Designed a presentation board and built a model of the courtyard for parishioner jeview. Worked with engineers on construction. details. Specified plants, site furniture and various construction materials. Worked on and supervised the courtyard construction. Southern Management Services, Inc., Belleair Bluffs, Florida Audit Supervisor September 1989 to January 1991 Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota Audit Senior October 1986 to August 1989 ACTIVITIES Minnesota chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects & AWARDS Certificate of Honor -1994 Assistant Editor, Works 9 Enjoy golf, volleyball, running, reading and traveling PROFESSIONAL Certified Public Accountant LICENSE Minnesota, 1988 mpa� Z 0_;I; OG7 = < —> c� - �N r < =��m >WOZp3,m r -0'073n >"o r O K D -A13 �Z=CDZ �z cn G)ri <<=m-n -G0mm< _ G)mrn< o�-‹m �cnr "n Z -X C7 PARK_ X cON x 15 7.2 19 X COO x X x 2- 16'X16' 1 - 32'X32' 1 - 23'X29' Courts X X (2) X x xxxxxx XX xx Softball X ` x x x Nx Electric x Soccer 1 • Grass a) 0 0. Grass 1 Grass 0 co 1 Grass co —3. co OCDruCD0GJCD 1 Grass Volleyball r j N cnN- N N- N) CD co N NO8 N N -. N Portable Basketball xxxxxxxxxxx Permanent Portable Permanent Portable Permanent 0 A. CT Portable Portable Portable Wentworth Ave. Timmy and Cullen Victoria & Douglas Road East of 1 -35E on Marie Ave. x Stockbridge & Concord Way Between Victoria & Lexington Playground X C) co CD co, 1 Pueblo Lane & Apache I Lexington & 110 Location 1 x x x , r • Fg± X x x I� Hockey pond, nature area o O concession building creek, hiking. nature area • lake, horseshoe pit. trails concession buildina pond; water features • concession buildina pond & trails pond & water features Q.. 0 a CD N C m pond, water features nature area - City Offices Notes /Additional • m�-mCDWOODrrnn Z- =zo5xxm <D 5r _�"<<v22iomm2�0-rG 0) <rrrr- 0) �trG�D73 M >xzA,zuirX <<=m-n -G0mm< _rIZZ0-0 m55 cog 0.3 5.5 cON CO 15 7.2 19 ^J COO Acres 16 1 - 23'X29' 2- 16'X16' 1 - 32'X32' 1 - 23'X29' CD CD 51- 71' x xxxxxx x Picnic Area XXX x Electric X ix x Water N) 0 co co co —3. co OCDruCD0GJCD E cnN- .1 .POal? N) CD co NO8 -. �. gi CD Cn Portable Portable O 0 0* Permanent Portable Permanent Portable Permanent 0 A. CT Portable Portable Portable Wentworth Ave. Timmy and Cullen Victoria & Douglas Road East of 1 -35E on Marie Ave. Dodd Road & Mendakota Dr Wagon Wheel Trail Marie & Delaware Ave. Stockbridge & Concord Way Between Victoria & Lexington Butler Ave. & Maple Park Dr Mendota His. Rd & E of Huber C) co CD co, 1 Pueblo Lane & Apache I Lexington & 110 Location 1 Q !'r t.. 2`r chs -totiFr • 1 c PL 00 0 o u