1993-12-14 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
DECEMBER 14, 1993 - 6:30 P.M.
** 6:30 o'clock p.m. **
1. Call to Order.
2, Roll Call.
3. Approval of November 9, 1993 Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes.
4. Discussion of Dakota County Regional Trail Project
Bob Doffing, Dakota County Park's Commissioner
5. Capital Improvement Planning for Park System
• Discussion of Friendly Hills Park
• Discussion of Friendly Hills Tot Lot
• Discussion of Friendly Marsh Park
• Discussion of Copperfield Ponds
6. Review of Concept Plans - North Kensington Park
• Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
7. Verbal Updates
• Arndt Addition Trail - Council Decision
• Report on ADA Seminar
• Ice Rink Update
• Tree City USA - Mr. Steven Shimek
8. Adjourn.
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request
at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120
hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every
attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible
on short notice. Please contact City Administration at
452-1850 with requests.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission was held on Tuesday, November 9, 1993, in the City Hall
Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called
to order at 6:35 o'clock P.M. The following members were present:
Damberg, Katz, Kleinglass, Linnell, Norton, Libra and Spicer. Also
present were Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder, Parks
Project Manager Guy Kullander and Recreation Programmer Shelli
Morgan.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Damberg moved to approve the October 12, 1993
Minutes.
Commissioner Linnell seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Damberg inquired about an article in the South-
West Review dated November 7, 1993 about the proposal to
upgrade the Friendly Hills streets. Commissioner Damberg
stated that the article stated "the reconstruction would be
funded from park land assessments and assessments to single
family lots and municipal state aid funds." Damberg inquired
if money from the special park fund would be used to pay park
land assessments for the Friendly Hills street project. Parks
Project Manager Kullander responded that the City Council
makes the decision on where the money comes from for
assessments to park land in Mendota Heights. Kullander stated
that other funding sources that exist are the MSA money and
the City Infrastructure Fund money. Kullander stated the City
was required to assess park land when it is in a project
district.
Commissioner Linnell inquired if there will be a trail
included in the Friendly Hills street project along Decorah
Avenue. Kullander stated that early plans had shown a trail
in the public right-of-way along Decorah Avenue, however the
residents of the neighborhood are not clamoring for a trail
with this street project. Kullander stated the street project
has not yet been approved by the City Council.
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated this month the
Parks and Recreation Commission would be reviewing Roger's
Lake Park and Mendakota Park for infrastructure and
replacement needs in the capital improvements planning
process. Batchelder stated the request for additional
irrigation extensions at Mendakota Park that the Commission
had received in September from Parks Leadperson Terry Blum had
been held over until this meeting and that this item should be
considered as well. He stated that in addition to the capital
improvements planning that the Commission was obligated to
review parking and traffic, as requested by City Council.
Commissioner Norton inquired if there was a history to the
fact that the parking lot at Roger's Lake was not paved.
Batchelder stated that in consideration of park improvements
during the referendum planning Roger's Park was decided to be
left in a rural, unpaved state. Parks Project Manager
Kullander stated there are no active fields at the park and
that it was felt that paving this particular parking lot was
not necessary and the City could save money. Batchelder
stated other parks had received paving for their parking lots
mainly due to the fact that there was a dust problem near
residential homes.
The Commission considered the list of improvements and
replacement items for Roger's Lake Park. Kullander stated
that this park receives some level of vandalism from time -to -
time, including the burning of two park benches this past
summer.
Kullander reviewed the list of possible future improvements to
Roger's Lake Park including:
1. Removing the wooden bridge to the picnic shelter and
replacing with bituminous walkway for American with
Disability Act standards and because of maintenance
concerns.
2. Install fire pits with the options being steel fire pits
or stone and concrete enclosures.
3. Additional horseshoe pits.
4. Pave the access driveways and parking areas.
5. Clearing out the brush along the trails for better
visibility.
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 3
6. Regulatory signage for park and trails.
7. Painting stripes on the hard court in 1995.
8. Port a Potty shelters.
9. ADA upgrades to play equipment.
10. Clearing the brush out along the beach and establishing
turf to water.
11. Remove five old benches.
12. Reroofing the picnic shelter.
13. Resurfacing the tennis court.
14. Seal coating of the trails.
Kullander explained that brushing out along the trail was a
difficult project for the park crews because of the time and
the equipment necessary to do this job. Kullander suggested
it might be a possibility to contract a firm to clear the
brush along the trails or that possibly this could be done as
a community work service project.
The Parks Commission discussed the possibility of getting a
wood chipper to help ease the work of removing brush that has
been cleared. Commissioner Damberg inquired if it would be
worth the City buying a chipper. Batchelder stated that he
felt there is a possibility the City could borrow a wood
chipper from a neighboring community.
Damberg inquired if there is a lot horseshoe play in Roger's
Lake Park. Recreation Programmer Morgan responded that she
has had a number of calls to rent horseshoes by people who are
using Roger's Lake Park. Kullander stated the City has one
nice horseshoe pit and that it is located in Roger's Lake
Park. He stated that horseshoe pits can be added for cheaper
costs than demonstrated on the list depending upon the level
of quality the City wants. Kullander described the West St.
Paul horseshoe complex. Kullander stated that when you have
just one horseshoe pit it tends to be a token. He stated that
if you put two or three horseshoe pits together they tend to
get used more often.
Kullander explained that the wooden bridge currently in
Roger's Lake Park is rising and heaving with the frost every
season and because it is not level with the trail it does not
meet American with Disabilities Act standards.
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 4
The Commission discussed fire pits in Roger's Lake Park and an
upgrade to a stone and concrete enclosure around a large pit
that could accommodate barbecues and small bonfires. Morgan
stated that Roger's Lake Park is the City's picnic park mainly
because of the location of volleyball, tennis, hard court,
picnic shelter, the lake view and the trail. She stated this
picnic shelter is rented almost every weekend during the warm
months of the year.
The Commission discussed the driveway and the unpaved parking.
Kullander stated that in the past the consensus was to keep
the driveway unpaved and the parking lot in a rural and
unimproved condition. Kullander described the ADA upgrades
that would be necessary for trails and transfer points.
Kullander stated that there is one new play structure in
Roger's Lake Park and one play structure which was renovated
at the time of the referendum. Kullander stated the tennis
court in Roger's Lake Park has cracks that need to be sealed
every year and if the City gets into another cycle of
resurfacing tennis courts Roger's Lake Park should be first on
the list.
Commissioner Damberg inquired about improving the quality of
the lake and having a beach at Roger's Lake Park. Kullander
stated the lake is very shallow and susceptible to weeds and
algae growth. Commissioner Norton stated that lake quality
issue was an issue that the City's Parks and Recreation
Commission should be more involved with. Commissioner Damberg
stated that educational efforts could be done by the City to
help improve the water quality in the lakes and pending areas
within the City. The Commission inquired if City Engineer
Klayton Eckies could address the topic of water quality, non -
point source pollution and steps the City can take to help the
water quality in the City at a future park meeting.
Commissioner Linnell stated he would like to see the benches
that are proposed to be removed be replaced and not just
removed. Kullander stated the park crews would like to see
the benches placed on concrete pads if they are not removed to
facilitate the ease of mowing grass.
The Commission discussed proposed future improvements,
replacement and infrastructure for Mendakota Park. Kullander
stated he has estimated that the lighting of the five sports
fields at Mendakota Park will cost approximately $175,000.
Kullander described the list of possible future improvements
to Mendakota Park as:
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 5
1. Sports lighting for five play fields.
2. Expanded irrigation system.
3. Maintenance building if lights are installed
4. Concrete bases for benches and trashers.
5. Resurface the basketball court with paint markings.
6. Re -stripe the parking lot.
7. Any additional landscaping.
8. Seal coat old trails.
9. Adopt backstops (or netting) for baseball/hardball.
10. Convert the grass volleyball area to sand court with
borders.
Kullander stated the sport lighting estimate is based on
Barton-Aschman's estimate at the time of the referendum and
the design of Mendakota Park. Kullander stated that Barton-
Aschman had estimated $150,000 to provide lights for the
fields at Mendakota Park. Kullander stated that his estimate
is on the high side but includes all poles and lights, lines
and transformers, and restoration that would be needed to
complete this project. Kullander stated it also includes the
lighting of the youth soccer field.
Kullander stated that installing lights at Mendakota Park
would be cheaper than building new fields if the City reaches
the point where demand is greater than field supply.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that at the time
the referendum items were put together lighting had been
considered for the softball complex. Batchelder stated a City
Councilmember had wanted to include lights in the plans for
Mendakota Park so that everyone would be aware that ballfield
lights were a possibility.
Commissioner Spicer stated the lights were always anticipated
as 'a future use at this park. He stated that during the
referendum there was never any opposition to the community
park having lights for the ballfields. Spicer stated that at
the time of the referendum it was anticipated that the
softball field complex would have lights when it was built.
Spicer stated no other fields in the City are lighted.
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 6
Commissioner Damberg stated that groups which desire to have
lights placed at these fields could participate in fund
raising efforts to provide for the cost. Damberg stated that
field lights are essentially a service for which only a
certain sector of the City receives benefits. Commissioner
Kleinglass inquired if the lights are shut off at 10:00 P.M.
and, if lights are provided, does this double the amount of
playing time.
Commissioner Spicer responded that lights would extend the
season during the spring and fall so that evening play was not
limited to a few months in the summer. Spicer stated that
adult softball leagues currently end in the last week in July
and that adding lights would not only double the playing time
in the evening during the summer but would allow fall and
spring leagues.
Commissioner Kleinglass stated that spring and fall leagues
would be for adults only and that children are in school at
this time. Kleinglass stated that providing lights would lead
to the commercialization of the programs with more adult
programs being offered and provided. Commissioner Kleinglass
stated if the City is going with more adult programs we should
not be lighting fields unless these programs are paying for
the lighting. Recreation Programmer Morgan stated that each
adult softball league more than pays for itself and generates
some revenue.
Kullander explained that the maintenance building, proposed on
the list for future improvements, would allow City crews to
work at night and on the weekends with the Cushman and the
equipment which is needed to grade and drag the fields, if
lights warrant a higher level of park crew activity.
Kullander stated that the basketball court is starting to wear
and could use a resurfacing in the near future.
Kullander described his proposals for allowing the fields to
be adapted for baseball at Mendakota Park, based on our
experience with foul balls last summer. He explained that one
option is to add hoods onto the existing backstops. He stated
that this has not proven to be very successful in the past.
Kullander stated the existing backstops could be extended in
height and then further extended by adding vertical netting.
Kullander stated that maintenance is a headache with netting
and that half the foul balls will probably still come over any
extension of netting. Kullander stated that a curved backstop
that is twenty-five feet deep and extending out over the home
plates would collect all of the foul balls. Kullander stated
the idea of providing netting strung from the backstop to the
comfort station was an idea which staff had considered and
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 7
rejected due to the high level of maintenance and the fact
that this netting would have to be attached to the comfort
station. Kullander stated the comfort station was not
designed to accommodate guy wires as an attachment.
Commissioner Spicer stated that both the Cities of Eagan and
Edina had provided this type of netting for their pinwheel
field designs to keep foul balls from injuring spectators.
Spicer stated he feels that this type of netting was not
incredibly expensive and certainly provided a level of safety.
Spicer stated it should be a priority for the City to provide
this type of netting in order to accommodate youth baseball at
Mendakota Park.
Commissioner Norton inquired if baseball could be played on
other fields. Commissioner Spicer stated that Mendakota Park
was ideal for weekend tournaments, that it was the best
facility in Mendota Heights and that the baseball parents
desired to be able to use these facilities.
Commissioner Linnell stated he feels that any irrigation
extension at Mendakota Park should be kept to a minimum and
that a little brown grass in the park is not the end of the
world.
NORTE KENSINGTON PARK
Commissioner Spicer inquired how much money was left in the
referendum. Batchelder stated he has not received a full
accounting on the referendum funds but it is his understanding
that there is less than $100,000 left in the referendum funds.
Batchelder stated there are probably more earmarked items
remaining than there was money left in the referendum fund.
Commissioner Spicer inquired if the Parks Commission should
continue talking about the design and construction of North
Kensington Park if there is not enough referendum money to
construct it. Kullander stated that priorities could be
established for the remaining referendum funding and the
remaining projects and there are other funds such as the
special park fund that could be used to construct this
project. Kullander stated this park could be constructed in
phases over a number of years.
Kullander stated the rest room and storage rooms provided by
U.S. West in the fiber optics building were put in with the
acknowledgment that there would be some future active use at
this park. Kullander stated vandalism has occurred at this
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 8
building because the low level of usage in this area.
Kullander stated the rest rooms have not been opened for
public use yet.
Commissioner Norton stated this area has received some
incredibly dense development and that park facilities are
necessary in this area. Kullander repeated that this park
would be appropriate for a higher use because of the rest room
facilities. Kullander stated there is no "draw" to the park
right now, as there are no facilities for people to use.
Commissioner Spicer inquired about tennis courts in southern
Mendota Heights. He stated he can see this park having some
type of picnic facilities, tennis court and a green area.
Commissioner Linnell stated there are picnic shelters in South
Kensington Park and it probably should not be duplicated in
this location.
Commissioner Linnell stated that some parking should be
provided to get the cars off of Mendota Heights Road at this
park. Linnell inquired if there is a half court facility in
this vicinity. Kullander stated there is a half basketball
court at Friendly Hills Park and at Hagstrom-King Park.
Commissioner Spicer stated that a tennis court is the only
facility which is not in close proximity to the new
construction in this area. Kullander stated that Hagstrom-
King had an area graded for tennis, however, he felt that one
or the other park should receive tennis but not both.
Kullander stated that any horseshoe pits would be most
appropriate near trees, in the shade, by a setting conducive
to picnicking.
Commissioner Libra stated that Hagstrom-King has more
potential for picnic type activities due to its natural
setting. Commissioner Spicer stated that there were not a lot
of natural amenities in North Kensington, but that tennis,
parking, horseshoes, plantings, berms, and the trail with the
rest open grass area would seem appropriate. Libra stated
that he felt the Homeowner's Associations in Kensington may
desire open space for kite flying, tossing a ball or frisbee,
type activities.
The Parks and Recreation Commission directed staff to work on
concept plans that would show tennis, parking, plantings,
berms and trail with open space in North Kensington Park for
the Commission to review and possibly present to the public in
neighborhood meetings to solicit input.
Parks and Recreation Commission
November 9, 1993
Page 9
VERBAL UPDATES
Batchelder stated that the City Council had approved both
recommendations from last month's Park and Recreation
Commission meeting - the Ivy Park warming house hours and the
Parks Reservation Policy.
Batchelder explained, in response to an inquiry, that the
Marie Park boulevard had not been mowed earlier in the summer
due to a tractor breakdown that will be fixed this winter. He
stated that the City had contracted the work and that the
boulevard had been maintained and mowed.
Batchelder stated that the request to revise the
bicycle/pedestrian trail in the Arndt Addition had been
forwarded to the Planning Commission who would hear the
request on November 23, 1993.
Batchelder stated that staff had explored the option of
converting the Ivy Park free skating to broomball but that the
cost appeared high to place boards for this purpose.
Batchelder stated that he had attended a seminar on Americans
With Disabilities Act sponsored by the Minnesota Department of
Employee Relations and had submitted a question regarding the
updating of all the city play equipment apparatus. MnDOER
will be providing written answers to all the questions
submitted. Batchelder stated it appeared that the City does
not have to update every individual component of the play
system, but that we have an obligation to review the whole
system, evaluate options for upgrading it and provide a level
of access to meet our obligations. A transition plan would be
necessary for those play structures not immediately updated.
Commissioner Libra stated that Ivy Park could use some more
picnic tables and that he had received a request for this.
Commissioner Libra inquired if the City could receive copies
of other city's mission statements for parks and park systems
as we begin exploring Park Vision/Philosophy on the target
issue list.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation
Commission adjourned at 8:10 o'clock p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 9, 1993
To: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant
Subject: Dakota County Regional Trail System
Mr, Bob Doffing, Dakota County Park's Commissioner
DISCUSSION
Mr. Bob Doffing, Mendota Heights resident and recently
appointed Parks and Recreation Commissioner for Dakota County,
desires to meet with our Commission to discuss two items. First,
he desires to meet the Commission, introduce himself and discuss
park and recreation cooperation in a general sense. Second, Mr.
Doffing desires to discuss the County's new plan for a regional
trail from South St. Paul to Red Wing and connections to the
Mendota Bridge/Soo Line Regional Trail.
In addition, we have been recently contacted by Dakota County
to provide input on the North Urban Trail concept. This trail
concept would link northern Dakota County regional trails from west
to east through Mendota Heights, West St. Paul and South St. Paul.
Please see attached letter from Jack Ditmore dated December 2,
1993.
I have also attached a summary of the Soo Line Corridor and
Regional Trail that was provided by John Forrest, Dakota County
Planner and a letter from the Soo Line Railroad regarding
abandonment. Also included as background is the official copy of
the Dakota County Regional Trail Development Plan - Northwest
Segment that was prepared at the time the Dakota County received
its ISTEA grant.
These items are being placed on your agenda as an update on
the Soo Line Regional Trail and for discussion regarding east/west
trail connections into West St. Paul for the North Urban Trail.
Mr. Ditmore has asked for a letter of support and City staff desire
any input from the Commission that would help us when we meet with
the County on Thursday, December 16, at 2 p.m., Wentworth Library.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with Mr. Doffing, discuss regional trails and trail
connections and provide staff with direction regarding letters of
support and guidance for upcoming meeting.
DAKOTA COUNTY
DIVISION OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
14955 GALAXIE AVENUE
DEPARTMENTS OF —
• ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• HIGHWAYS
• PARKS
• SURVEY
• OFFICE OF PLANNING
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
December 2, 1993
LOUIS J. BREIMHURST, P.E.
DIRECTOR
(612) 891-7005
FAX (612) 891-7031
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-8579
As you know, during the past year a plan for a regional trail along the Minnesota River in northwest Dakota County has
been developed for the Soo Line Corridor. This trail on the northwest side of the County complements the regional trail
planned for the South St. Paul riverfront on the northeast side of the County.
While the opportunities for regional trails along the Minnesota River in northwestern Dakota County and along the
Mississippi River from South St. Paul to Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve are logically defined, the east -west
connection of the corridors requires further consideration. While such a connection has been designated a priority for the
County by the County Board, specific routes and the status of the connection have not yet been resolved.
While verbal support for the trail was provided by your city at a recent Physical Development Board Committee meeting, a
follow-up letter of support for the trail would be appreciated.
In order to further research and develop a concept plan for the east -west trail corridor, currently named the North Urban
Trail, Dakota County has hired the consulting firm of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Barton-Aschman Associates began
working with Office of Planning staff in mid-November and is scheduled to complete this project in June, 1994.
We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you on Thursday, December 16, 1993 at 2:00 p.m. in the large
conference room at the Wentworth Library to address issues and gather information. Please bring copies of your city
trail plans along with maps, so that these proposals can be evaluated.
County staff will be acting as the liaison for local units of government and the consultants. Staff will keep you updated on
the progress of the trail development plan. Please direct all correspondence to John Forrest or Chantell Kadin at 891-
7030.
Sincerel
Jac Ditmore, Deputy Director
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
JD/JF/dj
cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners
Brandt Richardson, County Administrator
Louis J. Breimhurst, Physical Development Director
Barb Schmidt, Parks Director
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
DAKOTA COUNTY
DIVISION OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
14955 GALAXIE AVENUE
LOUIS J. BREIMHURST, P.E.
DIRECTOR
(612)891-7005
FAX (612) 891-7031
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-8579
December 7, 1993
DEPARTMENTS OF —
• ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
• HIGHWAYS
• PARKS
• SURVEY
• OFFICE OF PLANNING
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
This letter is to update you and your City on recent activities pertaining to the Regional Trail
project on the Soo Line Corridor in Lilydale, Mendota, and Mendota Heights. The following
is a status description of issues relating to the project.
Mendota Interchange/Trail Underpass Construction
Work is proceeding on schedule. Paving of the access road over the railroad right-of-way will
be completed soon. After all the road construction is completed, the 3000 -foot access road
will remain as the first paved portion of the regional trail. A bike trail from the Mendota
Bridge will eventually connect to the regional trail as shown on page 35 of the attached plan.
The trail underpass beneath the Highway #110 exit ramp, shown on page 35 and Appendix D,
is scheduled to be constructed this spring.
Railroad Abandonment
Our office recently received the attached Rail Line Abandonment letter from the Soo Line
Railroad Company. Since the rail line has not been in operation since July of 1987, we
understand that the railroad abandonment will occur through the "exempted" process. This
process will take several weeks instead of several months or years.
Trail Corridor Ownership and Management
We understand that the Soo Line Railroad has agreed to sell the rail line and all adjoining Soo
Line property to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). MnDOT and Dakota
County will be negotiating the terms for a "Limited Use Permit" wherein MnDOT would
remain the owner of the Trail Corridor and Dakota County would be the trail "custodian".
Such an agreement, of course, will require the approval of the Dakota County Board.
Lilydale Trail Segment
Staff has met with representatives of the Lilydale Yacht Club to refine the trail route past the
Yacht Club property. Staff has also met with St. Paul Parks staff and found that the County
Trail should link with the trail being built through Lilydale Regional Park. The trail
connection point is at a location just to the east of the Yacht Club parking lot. Much work
needs to be done on the Lilydale Trail Segment before it can be opened for public use.
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Page 2
Mendota Trail Segment
MnDOT will be conducting a monumentation study on the property that it acquires from the
Soo Line. Another study will define which properties are desirable to retain under MnDOT
ownership for regional trail use and when the regional trail will be built. A final study will
determine if there are properties not suitable for regional trail use, and how that property can
be transferred from MnDOT ownership.
Fort Snelling Trail Segment
The County is in the process of seeking grant funds to build the regional trail from the
Mendota Bridge south to Pilot Knob Road, as well as funds to complete construction of the
balance of the corridor. The Fort Snelling Trail Segment is scheduled to be constructed first.
The County will be working with MnDOT in an effort to coordinate design so that the
Regional Trail will merge in with the southbound County Bike Trail at the at -grade controlled
intersection of Pilot Knob and new Highway 13.
Mendota Heights Trail Segment
MnDOT, the City of Mendota Heights, and the County need to work together to decide how
this trail segment is used and managed over both the short term and long term. A trail
underpass beneath Highway 13 is desirable if this trail segment is made a part of the regional
trail over the long term.
Conclusion
We will continue to keep you updated on the progress of the regional trail corridor. We value
your comments and suggestions on how the regional trail should be built and managed. Please
call either Lynn Moratzka or me at 891-7030 if further information is needed. If you so
desire, we are available to meet with you to discuss these matters in further detail.
Sincerely,
John Fob
OFFICE OF PLANNING
JF/dj
cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners
City Clerks
Jonette Kreideweiss, MnDOT
Arne Stefferud, Metro Council
Ed Olson, St. Paul Parks
Dave Fisher, Minneapolis Parks
Peggy Lynch, Friends of the St. Paul Parks and Trails
Brandt Richardson, County Administrator
Jack Ditmore, Deputy Director, Physical Development
Barb Schmidt, Parks Director
Jay Stassen, Assistant County Attorney
Encl. Trail Development Plan: Official Copy
Rail Abandonment Letter from Soo Line
1000 Soo Line Buildino
Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440
Tel (612) 337-7543
Fax (612) 347-8203
Soo Line Railroad Company
Larry D Starns
Senior General Attorney
Administrative Law
and Contracts
November 19, 1993.
Mr. John Forrest
Senior Planner
Dakota County Office of Planning
14955 Galaxy Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Re: Request for Comments on Potential Environmental Impacts
of Proposed Mendota Heights, MN Rail Line Abandonment
in Dakota County, State of Minnesota
•ICC Docket No.: AB -57 (Sub. No. 35X)
Dear Mr. Forrest:
Soo Line Railroad Company (Soo) will in the very near future petition
the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to discontinue and abandon
all freight rail operations over approximately 4.2 miles of rail
line located in Mendota. Heights, Minnesota (the Mendota Heights
Line). A map of the proposed abandonment is enclosed as well as a
listing and copies of the relevant U.S.G.S. topographic maps on which
this line appears.
This proposed rail line abandonment requires approval by the
Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). I will be preparing an
Environmental Report that will provide the basis of the environmental
review that the ICC's Section of Energy and Environment (SEE) will
conduct for this proceeding. In preparing this Environmental Report,
consultation with agencies or organizations that may have specific
interest in or knowledge of the potential environmental impacts is
essential. This letter is, therefore, intended to solicit your
comments regarding potential environmental impacts, if any, of the
proposed rail line abandonment.
As shown on the attached maps, the Mendota Heights line is located in
the Minnesota county of Dakota. The line that is proposed to be
abandoned begins at Mile Post 160.7+ and runs in a South -North
direction to Mile Post 164.9+ near Mendota Heights, MN. It is
located parallel to Highway 13 in an industrial area of Mendota
•Heights and traverses an undeveloped portion of the Minnesota River
Valley between the Mendota Bridge and the 135 freeway bridge. The
line runs through the town of Mendota (population approximately 300).
While Soo will attempt to sell the Mendota Heights line or portions
thereof, a suitable purchaser may not be found in the appropriate
time frame. For purposes of evaluating the environmental impacts
that would result from abandonment of the line, it is conservatively
assumed that the line will not be sold intact. Soo's proposed
action, therefore, includes salvaging equipment and materials that
are resent on the line, in addition to discontinuing freight
service.
Most of the Mendota Heights line consists of a single track with an
average 100 -foot right-of-way. In addition to the right-of-way, the
rail line includes an estimated 0 buildings, 0 bridges, 9 culverts,
and 5 road crossinvs. A listing of these structures and crossings
with their respective locations is enclosed for your reference. The
proposed action includes the removal of all rails, ties, spikes,
plates, railroad -related utilities, signaling devices, bridge spans,
and bridge decking. The ballast, bridge abutments, and culverts
would remain in place. Soo would continue to maintain the culverts
as long as it owns the right-of-way. The buildings along the line
would be offered for sale to local communities, townships, counties,
other interested parties, and owners of reversionary rights along the
line. Unwanted buildings would generally be demolished. However,
buildings and bridges that are determined by the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) to be eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places would not be dismantled or
demolished unless or until permitted by applicable law and
regulations. All equipment and materials that are removed from the
line would either be reused, sold as scrap, or disposed of in
accordance with applicable environmental regulations.
The Environmental Report for the proposed abandonment of the Mendota
Heights line is being prepared pursuant to ICC regulations (49 CFR
Chapter X, Part 1105) (copy of which is enclosed), the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. Sections 4321 et seq.,
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 42 U.S.C. Sections 6201 et
seq., the National Historic Preservation Act 16 U.S.C. Sections 470
et seq., and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. Sections
1531 et seq. Areas of concern that you and other interested parties
are invited to address in your comments include potential impacts of
the proposed action on the following:
• Local land use
• Existing local and regional transportation systems
• Energy use
* Air emissions and ambient air quality conditions
• Water quality and wetlands
• Biological resources, including threatened or
endangered species
• Ambient noise levels
• Public health safety
• Historic, cultural, or archaeological sites listed or
eligible for inclusion on the National Register of
Historic Places
• Socioeconomics, including local and regional employment
We are soliciting your comments with regard to: (1) any
permitting/approval authority which your agency has over the proposed
action, and (2) any specific concerns which you feel should be
addressed in the ICC environmental document prepared after our Report
is submitted. As required by applicable ICC regulations (49 CFR,
Chapter X, Part 1105.7(e)(8)(1)), we also request that you comment on
and describe the effects, if any, of our proposed action on those
resources or areas of concern within the authority of your agency.
Specifically, the Commissions's regulations state that, with respect
to the area of concern within the jurisdiction of your agency, Soo
Line must address the following:
"49 C.F.R. Part 1105.7(e)(2) Transportation System: (2)
Transportation System. Describe the effects, of the proposed
action on regional or local transportation systems and
patterns. Estimate the amount of traffic (passenger or
freight) that will be diverted to other transportation
systems or modes as a result of the proposed action."
"49 C.F.R. Part 1105.7(e)(4)(i)-(iv) Energy: (4) Energy.
(i) Describe the effect of the proposed action on
transportation energy resources.
(ii) Describe the effect of the proposed action on
recyclable commodities.
(iii) State whether the proposed action will result in an
increase or decrease in overall energy efficiency and
explain why.
(iv) If the proposed action will cause diversions from
rail to motor carriage of more than:
(A) 1,000 rail carloads a year; or
(B) An average of 50 rail carloads per mile per year for
any part of the affected line, quantify the resulting net
change in energy consumption and show the data and
methodology used to arrive at the figure given. To minimize
the production of repetitive data, the information on
overall energy efficiency in Section 1105.7(e)(4)(iii) need
not be supplied if the more detailed information in Section
1105.7(e)(4)(iv) is required."
"49 C.F.R. Part 1105.7(e)(5)(ii)(c) Air:
(C) An average increase in truck traffic of more than 10
percent of the average daily traffic or 50 vehicles a day on
a given road segment, then state whether any expected
increased emissions are within the parameters established by
the State Implementation Plan. However, for a rail
construction under 49 U.S.C. 10901 (or 49 U.S.C. 10505), or
a case involving the reinstitution of service over a
previously abandoned line, only the three train a day
threshold in this item shall apply." (emphasis added)
"49 C.F.R. Part 1105.7(e)(7)(i) Safety: (7) Safety (i)
Describe any effects of the proposed action on public health
and safety (including vehicle delay time at railroad grade
crossings."
Please address these questions in particular and, if you so desire,
any other matters within the scope of the Report as you deem
appropriate.
Your comments should be submitted to the undersigned at the address
on this letterhead. They will be appended to the Environmental
Report being submitted to the Commission. Your response would be
appreciated as soon as possible as preparation of the Environmental
Report is required prior to filing for abandonment. I will be
following up with a phone call within one week to confirm receipt of
this letter and to discuss any additional data you may require to
enable us to complete our Report.
Any comments or information that you provide will be included in
Soo's Environmental Report and will be considered by the ICC in the
preparation of the draft environmental document and in its evaluation
of the overall environmental and energy impacts of the proposed
action. Your cooperation will help ensure that all environmental
concerns are thoroughly addressed.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
LDSAmmw
cc: Mn DNR -
Mn SHPO - Dr.
MPCA - Mr.
MnTRB - Mr.
Dakota County
Very truly yours,
SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY
Rodney W. Sando
Nina Archabal
Charles W. Williams
Timothy S. Perry
- Mr. Brandt Richardson
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 9, 1993
To: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass
Subject: Capital Improvements Plan
DISCUSSION
The schedule for discussion of the Capital Improvements Plan
for this month's agenda includes:
Friendly Hills Park
Friendly Hills Tot Lot
Friendly Marsh Park
Copperfield Ponds
These parks will be reviewed for maintenance, capital
improvements and replacement on Tuesday evening. A map of each
park and a list of possible future improvements in each of these
parks will be available on Tuesday evening. As before, the
generation of this list is based on our awareness of items in these
parks and discussions with Terry Blum, Park Leadperson,
The Commission should review the list and discuss funding
sources and priorities. In addition, each park should be reviewed
for parking and traffic, as requested by City Council,
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the infrastructure and the capital improvements needs
for the above listed park areas, discuss priorities, funding
sources and parking needs, and provide direction to staff.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 9, 1993
To: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative A 'st Tit
Subject: North Kensington Park
Concept Plans
DISCUSSION
Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander will be prepared on
Tuesday evening to present concept plans based on the Commission's
discussion of North Kensington Park over the last several months.
This will be a concept plan that shows tennis, a small amount of
parking, trails and plantings and berms with the balance of the
park being open space.
At the November 9, 1993 meeting, the Commission felt that
tennis courts were under represented in this area of the City and
also desired not to duplicate facilities found at other nearby
parks, such as half court basketball and play structures. The
Commission felt that Hagstrom-King was a more natural setting if
any picnic type activities are desired.
As has been discussed, some type of neighborhood meeting
should be held before final design recommendations are made to City
Council for the development. The Commission should discuss
possible approaches for public input on concept plans.
ACTION REQUIRED
Acknowledge presentation of concept plans and provide
direction to staff on proceeding with plans and neighborhood input.