Loading...
1979-11-20 Council minutesPage 1181 November 20, 1979 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, November 20, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilman Hartmann, Councilman Losleben, Councilman Mertensotto, Councilwoman Witt. APPROVAL OF Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the minutes of the MINUTES November 6th meeting as corrected. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Mertensotto Councilman Losleben moved approval of the minutes of the November 13th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 BID AWARD, HAPPY City Engineer Kishel reviewed the tabulation of bids receivec HOLLOW BRIDGE for construction of the Happy Hollow Bridge temporary sani- UTILITIES tary sewer bypass. Mr. Kishel recommended that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Deluxe Construction Company, ad- vising the Council that construction must begin as soon as possible in order to meet the Mn/DOT construction schedule. After discussion, Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No. 79-118, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARD- ING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HAPPY HOLLOW BRIDGE TEMPOR- ARY SANITARY SEWER BYPASS (Imp. 79, Proj. 10)," awarding the bid to Deluxe Construction, Inc. for their low bid of 0( $65,203.00. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 The Council discussed a request from the Dakota County Board regarding sale of tax forfeit property located and described as part of Lot 3, Block 1, North Ivy Hills. Councilman Mertensotto moved approval of the classification of parcel #27-52200-030-01 as non-conservation land, and approving its sale as tax forfeit property, authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute the necessary papers, and directing that the City Clerk pursue delinquent assessments if the property is sold as tax forfeited. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. CASE NO. 79-18, VANLANDSCHOOT Page 1182 November 20, 1979 Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a continued public hearing on an application from Mr. David VanLandschoot for the subdivision of lot 18, Linden Addition and related variances. Mr. VanLandschoot and Mr. John Bannigan, Jr., his legal representative, were present for the discussion. Mr. Bannigan stated that he represents Mr. VanLandschoot in his request for subdivision, wetlands variance of 15 feet, a variance from frontage on a 60 foot street to a 30 foot street which is actually platted but umimproved, and a front yard setback variance. He stated that the City's concern under the zoning ordinance is health, safety and welfare, and that Mr. VanLandschoot has covered those points in his letter to the Council. He stated that the subdivision meets the requirements of the City if the variances are granted, and that it does not adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of the community; the proposed density is much less than the 15,000 square foot lot minimum; and it is consistent with the City's zoning and land use plans. He therefore requested an approval of the necessary variances. He felt that granting approval would alleviate hardships peculiar to this land alone. Mr. VanLandschoot also showed the Council and audience photographs of the lot. Mr. VanLandschoot stated that lot averages in the area are 24,000 square feet, and the size of the proposed house is much greater than the 1,800 square foot average for the community. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. With respect to a question on lot area posed by the Council on November 6th, City Engineer Kishel stated that his report from 1976 showed a shoreline different from what currently exists, and that he disagrees with the applicant over buildable lot area. He stated that he has computed land area above 872.2 feet in the proposed plat to be 37,500 square feet in Lot 1, and 21,600 for Lot 2, or a total area of 59,100 square feet above level 872.2. He noted that ther is a discrepancy of roughly 13,000 square feet between his calculations and the map prepared by the McLagan surveying firm. A representative of the McLagan firm who was present, stated that the land area on the lakeside of the channel was included in his data, since the applicant had not directed that the information be based on buildable area above 872.2 feet. He noted that this area would account for the discre- pancy. Mr. Paul Maczko, 907 Cheri Lane, asked whether Mr. Kishel ha information on the land area which was assessed at the time he owned the property. Mr. Kishel stated that when Mr. Maczko owned the property, it was assessed for trunk sewer based on 43,792 square feet of area. Mr. Maczko pointed out that discrepancy in area between Mr. Kishel's recent figures and the 43,792 feet is roughly 16,000 square feet, and Mr. Kishel responded that this discrepancy is the result of the filling done by Ronald Smith in 1976. Page 1183 November 20, 1979 At the request of Councilman Losleben, City Administrator Johnson read Section 5.5 of the Zoning Ordinance for the audience and Council. Councilman Mertensotto stated that he was not present for the November 6th Council discussion on the application. However, he stated that he had met with Mr. VanLandschoot, and the previous owner, Mr. Ronald Smith, and that he had studied all the materials presented regarding the case. Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that in order to approve the subdivision, the Council must also grant the variances requested. He noted that in 1976 the Council considered an application (for the subject property) for vacation of Cheri Lane and a variance to build within 75 feet of the shoreline and within ten feet of the extended right-of-way as shown on the plat. Several years previous, the Council considered a request for approval of a building permit for Lot 18, Linden Addition. He noted that at that time, the property was considered marginal, swampy land, and the request was denied. In 1976 the request for lot division, street vacation and variances was also denied. He stated that he has been trying to determine what has changed between 1976 and the current application - - the application under consideration is for division of platted land that previously was not buildable. He stated that all he can conclude is that there must be more land area than there was in 1976, which is the result of unauthorized filling done without benefit of a conditional use permit. He stated that this is an irregular parcel of land that in all past planning was never intended to be divided. Councilman Mertensotto noted that in 1976 the City received a petition from 60 to 80 residents indicating their opposition to division of the lot and that a petition signed by 103 people in opposition to the division was received at the November 6th Council meeting. He stated that the pro- perty is not located on a 60 foot street and that while the easterly lot could have access from the 30 foot Cheri Lane right-of-way, access to the proposed westerly lot could only be via the extended 30 foot right-of-way which is currently being used only for drainage and public access to the lake. He expressed concerns over emergency vehicle access as well as the responsibility for maintenance of the right-of-way should the lot division be approved. He stated that the only justification he can see for division, which he did not feel to be a practical hardship, is purely one of economic gain. He felt that the subdivision request should be denied, that if the application were approved and the newly created westerly lot were sold, the City would then be responsible for finding a way for the new property owner to build and to control drainage. He felt that the request for lot division is unreasonable and that the Council's decision is discre- tionary. Mr. Bannigan stated that he interprets the variance portion of the zoning ordinance to mean that the prime concerns of the Council should be health, safety and welfare of the community, not past history. He pointed out that the land mass exceeds minimum standards for building and that the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 79-26, MILNAR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Page 1184 November 20, 1979 function of the Council is to put into productivity parcels such as this. He stated that the parcel should become productive land rather than simply bringing in $46.00 a year in taxes. He stated further that he does not feel two units is an unreasonable compromise in view of the land area, that the public right to drainage and access to the lake for hiking and skating would still exist. Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that variances are grante based on hardship. He pointed out that Mr. Smith had ad- vised him that he fully disclosed details on the earlier denial of the vacation and subdivision prior to the sale to Mr. VanLandschoot and that Mr. VanLandschoot then knew befor purchasing the parcel that the Council had denied the pre- vious lot division request. Councilman Losleben felt that the lot division would be a matter of convenience to the applicant only and therefore could not support the division. Councilwoman Witt stated that she was not on the Council when the earlier lot divisio: request was considered. She stated that she can see no evidence of hardship. There being no further pertinent comments; Councilman Losleben moved that the hearing be closed. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of Resolution No. 79-119, "RESOLUTION DENYING REQUEST OF DAVID VANLANDSCHOOT FOR SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18, LINDEN ADDITION AND VARIANCES WITH RESPECT THERETO." Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a publi hearing on an application for a conditional use permit from Dr. Frank Milnar for placement of approximately 1,200 yards of fill on Lot 5, Block 1, Ridgewood Park Addition. Dr. Milnar stated that he purchased the property in Feburary of 1979 with the idea of constructing a residence on it. He stated that upon purchasing the property it was conveyed to him by the owner at the time that it was a buildable lot, that there were no water problems, and that an inordinate amount of fill would not be needed. Dr. Milnar further stated that when spring thaws melted snow it became apparent that the lot was not a buildable site. He stated that the lot provides the natural drainage for the area, and a culvert runs through the property on a ten foot easement. He pointed out that the only way he could remedy the situa- tion is to bring in fill, landscape the lot and make it more suitable for someone to build on. He stated that the lot was misrepresented to him and he no longer plans to build on it, his is now trying to make it a buildable lot for Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page 1185 November 20, 1979 someone else and to make it more asthetically pleasing for the neighborhood. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mrs. Dorothy Troeltzch, 825 Hilltop Road, stated that she feels badly for Dr. Milnar, however she is concerned that a substandard house would be built on the lot if filling is approved. Councilman Mertensotto felt that the discussion should be continued so that the Council could make a visual inspection of the lot. Councilman Losleben stated that he would prefer that the prospective property owner submit house plans and that filling to accommodate the landscaping plan be consider ed at that time. Dr. Milnar stated that he is not trying to do anything excessive, that he simply wants to accomplish a filling plan which would give him some potential for sale. Mayor Lockwood stated that the land should be saleable if th Council would pass a motion indicating that it has no pre- judice to building on the lot providing the purchaser submit a plan for building and landscaping. After discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved that the hearing be continued to 7:30 P.M. on December 4th. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Dr. Milnar requested that staff research the history of the lot to the north of his property for filling and building permit information. YACKEL LOT Mr. Roger Yackel was present, at the Council's request to DIVISION discuss the division of Lot 1, Vandall's Outlots, and the pending sale of the westerly lot, including the old struc- ture. The Council acknowledged receipt of memos from the City Administrator, Clerk and Code Enforcement Officer rela- tive to the matter. Mayor Lockwood pointed out that a lette from the City Planner dated January 30, 1979, indicates that it was the intent of the property owner that the existing structure be razed, and it was on that bisis that the Counci considered and granted the subdivision approval. He stated that the Council was advised a week ago that this wasn't the case and that there is a pending sale of the property. Mr. Yackel introduced Mrs. Donna Bradt and her son Peter, purchasers of the lot. Mr. Yackel stated that the first time he discussed the matter with the City Planner he indicated that he had two different approaches, one being to tear down the existing structure, and the other to remodel the structure. He stat- ed that he feels that the house is structurally solid and that the cost of remodeling is minimal. Mayor Lockwood stated that according to information receive Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Page 1186 November.20, 1979 from staff, there is actually 200.95 feet of frontage on the entire parcel of property, and further stated that the equal lot division would actually allow property setbacks. He suggested that the action approving the setback variance should be rescinded, that there is no longer a need for variance. Mr. Yackel stated that he still wants the ten foot variance. Councilman Mertensotto felt the variance which had been approved should be rescinded at this time and that a request should be made, if desired, when a structure is planned. Councilman Mertensotto asked Mrs. Bradt whether she plans to do all of the repairs at one time or do some of the repairs and let the rest wait. She responded that their plan is to do only the heating and sewer and water extensions now. Mr. Bradt stated that next spring a new roof would be put on and other repairs would be done. Councilman Mertensotto suggested that the Council acquire some type of guarantee from the Bradt's that the updating will be done. Mrs. Bradt stated that they want to update the house, and shE realized that she needs to give the City some kind of guarantee. She was concerned,' however, that if a substantiaJ amount of money is put into an escrow account she will not have funds available to do the work. She stated that she has contracted for the sewer and water extensions at the pre- sent time, and that a contractor has been hired to reroof the home in the spring and another contractor to do siding and insulation in the spring. Councilman Mertensotto suggested that the Council require an escrow deposit which could remain with the City if the building permit is not completed within a specified time frame. When asked what the anticipated completion time is, • Mr. Bradt stated that they anticipate completion in 26 months with the exception of the garage. . Mrs. Bradt stated that although the Code Enforcement Officer indicated new siding should be required, she did not feel that new siding was necessary. After further discussion, Councilman Mertensotto moved to amend the original Council action approving the division of Lot 1, Vandall's Outlots into a lot of 100 feet frontage, and a lot of 100.95 feet of frontage, and rescinding the ten foot sideyard setback variance. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. The City Planner, Howard Dahlgren, and several Planning Commission members were present to discuss the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mayor Lockwood stated that at the November 13th special meeting the Council had discussed the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan and its distribu- tion, and the action relative to distribution resulted in a split vote. Mayor Lockwood stated that the 3-2 vote on November 13th was the result of proposed zoning changes for Page 1187 November 20, 1979 the following properties: two parcels of property adjacent to the T.H. 49 right-of-way north and south of Mendota Heights Road from R-1 to medium density; a parcel of land adjacent to the Mendakota Country Club from R-1 to high density; property adjacent to Pilot Knob Road and north and east of the Acacia Park Cemetery from B-1A, R-3, and R-1 to high density and medium density; the three parcels of pro- perty adjacent to the I-35E right-of-way and Mendota Heights Road from B-3 and R-1 to high density. City Planner Dahlgren reviewed the history of planning Mendota Heights. He stated that in 1960 when the City adopt ed its first Land Use Plan, the City set some goals and achieved them. One of the important things the Council at that time tried to achieve was a balanced tax base. He stated that some people might say that the original Land Use Plan should be left the way it was, however, he pointed out that many changes have occurred over the past 20 years. Some of the changes he pointed out were the impact of the fiscal disparities law, the trend for office parks to locate closer to the Metropolitan Areas, an alternative housing need for older residents has not been addressed in the existing plan, and years agocities did not need to plat land and then zone for usages. Today the laws are different today rezoning must be in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Dahlgren stated that in looking at the overall concerns of the City Council he feels very strongly that the rezoning proposed for the MAC area is necessary. He pointed out that no new commercial zoning is being added in the proposed plan, that only changes from single family to medium density and high density south of Highway 110 are proposed, and that no changes north of High- way 110 are proposed. He also advised the Council that the only site in the entire City which would qualify and meet the criteria for senior citizen housing is the parcel pro- posed to be zoned high density adjacent to Mendakota. He advised the Council, however, that the owners of that parcel have been unable to get financing. He stated that the owner have presented preliminary plans for residents showing development (a mix of single family housing and townhouses) and are no longer planning senior citizen housing for the parcel. Mr. Dahlgren stated that knowing that Mendota Heights Road must someday be extended, that the interchange of 494 and 49 will occur in the future, he and the Planning Commission feel that the properties adjacent to 494 and south of Mendota Heights Road would not be appropriate for single family development. Mr. Dahlgren stated that if it is the determination of the council that the parcels north and south of Mendota Heights Road and adjacent to the 35E right-of-way north of 494 and adjacent to the Highway 49 right-of-way should retain the current zoning status the action should reflect a determination that the zoning for those parcels should be reconsidered for medium density and high density zoning when the highway construction is com- pleted. Mr. Dahlgren suggested that changes should be made in the housing element portion of the Comprehensive Plan relating to low and moderate income housing. He stated Page 1188 November 20, 1979 that the Planning Commission dropped consideration of that portion of the housing element after the public hearing at Somerset School. He stated that the element should state that the City is not going to change density or lot sizes to accommodate low income housing. Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Donald Huber, 577 Maple Park Drive, asked whether zoning in the Acacia Park area to high density would subject the City to low and moderate income housing, forcing the exten- sion and financing of sanitary sewer and water improvements? Mr. Joe Stefani, a member of the Planning Commission, asked that if the Council changes the proposed zoning of the areas adjacent to 494 south of Mendota Heights Road to single family, if after 494 is constructed would the Council then give the Planning Commission the opportunity to consider changing the zoning for that property to high density. • Mrs. Sandra Butler, also a member of the Planning Commission asked whether in fact the Council wa§mgaIR-q-that even after the freeway construction is completed the Council would not then consider high density zoning for the area adjacent to the freeway? Planner Dahlgren cautioned that the Council should recognize that a risk is being taken in showing single family zoning adjacent to the freeways. He stated that the City must submit a sewer plan based on the Comprehensvie Plan to the Metropolitan Council, and the type of zoning which will in fact occur will set the basis for the sewer plan for that area. Mrs. Madelyn Shipman, member of the Planning Commission, stated that she thought the Planning Commission should recommend providing for some variety of housing in the City. That the Commission should recommend providing PUD consid- erations in single family or else the City will end up as a total single family community without any variety. She pointed out that if single family zoning is established south of Mendota Heights Road and north of 1-494, and is allowed to develop as single family, when 494. iS 'completed the Council will have lost the ability to make any changes in zoning. Mr. John Frank, also a member of the Planning Commission, stated that he is also concerned about the zoning of that particular parcel of land; he would not personally build a single family dwelling on that parcel of property and cannot envision that anyone would purchase the property for single family use. Mayor Lockwood moved that the Council reconsider action taken on the proposed Comprehensive Plan of the November 13th meeting. Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. Page 1189 November 20, 1979 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Lockwood moved for preliminary approval of revisions t( be made in the text of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Housing element, that Planner Dahlgren's recommendation for the Acacia Park area be accepted, that the following proper- ties be changed in the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan to reflect zoning classifications as shown on the existing Zoning Map: two parcels east of T.H. 49, one immediately north and one immediately south of Mendota Heights Road; the northeast and southeast quadrants of I-35E and Mendota Heights Road;landnorth of 1-494, between I-35E and T.H. 49; and a parcel adjacent to Mendakota Country Club property; that the proposed comprehensive Land Use Plan be approved for distribution to the Metropolitan Council and contiguous communities, subject to review of the draft by the Council. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 BOND ISSUE Councilman Mertensotto asked for an opportunity to discuss DISCUSSION his views on the proposal for a. park bond referendum as well as a bond issue for Fire Department expansion. He stated that he had been acting as the Council's representative to the Fire Department and has been working with the department relative to expansion proposals. He expressed his concerns over the need to maintain a volunteer department and his concern that the Fire Department expansion be considered a high priority. Councilman Mertensotto expressed his fear that current economic conditions are such that referendums for both a $1.4 million dollar park bond issue and a $400,00 to $500,000 Fire Department issue would be unwise. He suggested that the Council consider a proposal for bonding for the Fire Department expansion and $400,000 for acquisi- tion of the Wachtler property for park use. He felt that the City should negotiate an option on the property in the near future so that development does not occur, but that the School District property acquisition be deferred until some future time. It was his opinion that the sale and development of the School District property is not imminent, nor is its acquisition crucial at this time. Councilwoman Witt stated that she agrees that the Fire Department expansion is needed. She further stated, however that the Park and Recreation Commission feels very strongly about their proposal and about the hiring of a planning expertise, including planning for a Fire Department issue. She did not feel that it would be fair to sell the Park Commission short. The Council took the recommendations under advisement. No action was taken at this time. Mayor Lockwood called for a recess at 11:40 P.M. The meetin was reconvened at 11:47 P.M. HUBER DRIVE Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 DUTCH ELM Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page 1190 November 20, 1979 Mr. Joe Dotty, of August Construction Company, was present to discuss the status of Huber Drive. City Engineer Kishel advised the Council that Huber Drive has been paved as far as the Montgomery driveway. He cautioned that it would be inadvisable to allow driving on the balance of Huber Drive during current weather conditions. He suggested that once a good crown on the roadway is accomplished, traffic should not be allowed on it until there is at least six inches of frost in the ground, in order to protect the roadway surface. He also suggested that vehicles should not be allowed on Huber Drive during the spring thaw. Mr. Kishel stated that the only vehicles currently needing access to Delaware Crossing are vehicles bringing materials to the August Construction building sites. He further stated that the contract specifications and an agreement with August Construction disallow construction site vehicles from using Friendly Hills as an access to Delaware Crossing. Mr. Dotty requested that the Council approve the Engineer's recommendation and allow his company's construction vehicles to use Decorah Lane on a limited basis for a limited period of time prior to favorable frost conditions and during spring thaw. He felt that it would be a benefit to the community, and to everyone involved, to restrict vehicular traffic from Huber Drive to protect it from damage. Mr. Dotty statedthat if the request is approved no big equip- ment will come through the Friendly Hills area, only block, cement and luMber trucks. The Council expressed its concern over the condition of Huber Drive and protection of the street from ruts and vehicular damage while the street surface is doft. After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved that traffic to the August Construction Company sites be allowed on Decorah Lane for two to four weeks from the present time, and two to four weeks during the spring thaw to allow protection of the Huber Drive street surface. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. The Council directed that a letter be sent to the Friendly Hills residents advising them of the Council action and Concern for the protection of Huber Drive. Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 165, "AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SHADE TREE PROGRAM, PROVIDING REGULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF CERTAIN DISEASES AFFECTING TREES, INCORPORATING AGENCY RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF." Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 79-120, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR SANITATION AND REFORESTATION GRANT AGREEMENT." Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS Page 1191 November 20, 1979 Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Administrator relative to cable communications. It was the concensus of the Council that adequate study cannot be made during the ninety day period allowed for such a study, and that Capitol City Cablevision should be advised to either ' proceed more slowly or withdraw its CST proposal. It was also the concensus of the Council that a Cable Advisory Board should be established and directed that a press releasE requesting application should be published. HALLOWEEN The Council members expressed their appreciation for the BONFIRE • time and effort expended.by Mr. Russell Wahl on the prepara- tion for and conduct of the annual Halloween Bonfire. The Council members directed that a letter of appreciation be prepared for signature by all members. MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged receipt of the engineering status report for October. The Council acknowledged receipt of a request for expansion of the Ivy.Falls Creek, Phase 1-C, construction contract. City Engineer Kishel advised the Council that the project has-been completed so no action on the request is necessary. The Council acknowledged a letter from the City Engineer and request for Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company for an exten- sion on the elevated water storage tank construction contraci On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Losleben moved to grant an extension for completion of water tank erection to January 5, 1980. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ENGINEERING City Engineer Kishel distributed copies of a tabulation of FEES engineering expenses incurred and anticipated as the result of Marie Avenue Bridge Approach repairs. He indicated that the total engineering expenses are estimated at $7,190.95, however the total fees anticipated to be billed to the City amount to $4,063.81. It was the concensus of the Council that $4,063.81 would be a compromise as the maximum the City would expend for the engineering services. Councilman Mertensotto moved to authorize an expenditure of $4,063.81 for engineering fees in connection with Marie • Avenue Bridge approach treatment. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 FINAL PAYMENT Councilman Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 79-121 "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAY- Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 LIST OF CLAIMS Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 LICENSES Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ADJOURN Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTEST: Page 1192 November 20, 1979 MENT (IMPROVEMENT NO. 77, PROJECT NO. 12)," approving the final payment of $5,686.91 to Lametti and Sons, Inc. for 0 Crown Point Addition improvements. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Councilman Losleben moved approval of the list of claims submitted for payment with the agenda. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the list of licenses granting licenses to: Geo. Sedgwick Htg. & A.C. Company Valley Plumbing Company Gilbert-Koch, Inc. E & H Earth Movers, Inc. Wm. Murr Plumbing Co., Inc. Woodbury Mechanical Gilbert & Sons RI-GO Builders, Inc. Tartan Construction Co. Donald R. Reierson Custom Homes Bollig & Sons, Inc. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company Walrich Cement Corporation Tom Thumb No. 563 W. Construction T.J.. Htg. & A.C. Inc. Rauchwarter, Incorporated Cedar Valley Htg. & A.C., Inc. Ryan Air Conditioning Inc. Imperial Developers, Inc. Steininger Construction Co., Inc. Htg. & A.C. License Plumbing License Cement/Masonry License Excavating License Excavating License Plumbing License General Contractors Lic General Contractors Lic Cement/Masonry License General Contractors Lic Excavating License General Contractors Lic Cement/Masonry License 3.2 Off-Sale Beer Lic. Cement/Masonry License Htg. & A.C. License Excavating License Htg. & A.C. License Htg. & A.C. License General Contractors Lic Excavating License Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion. There being no further business to come before the Council Councilwoman Witt moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:41 a.m. Robert G. Lockwood Mayor )21, thleen M. Swanson City Clerk