1982-02-02 Council minutesPage No. 1607
February 2, 1982
4. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement Officer's monthly
report for January.
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CASE #81-40,AMERICAN Mr. Charles Toomey, owner of the Standard Oil Station at 2030
OIL COMPANY, VARIANCE Dodd Road, was present-to request Council approval to install
a 6 foot 6 inch, by 5 foot 6 inch changeable gas price sign on
the existing pylon standard located at the gas station _�
site. Mr. Toomey stated that it is proposed to install the
sign so that the bottom of the sign is 10 feet above the
ground level and facing in the same direction as the existing
Standard sign. Mr. Toomey advised the Council that if the
sign is approved, he will remove all other advertising signs
from the site.
Mayor Lockwood pointed out to the Council that there is no
variance to the sign size required if all other signs are
removed, since the total area of both the Standard sign and
the newly proposed sign is 95.5 square feet and the ordinance
allows 100 square feet of sign area. He pointed out that the
City's Zoning Ordinance requires that signs on pylons be placed
a minimum of 14 vertical feet from the bottom of the sign to the
ground. Mr. Toomey advised the Council that the pylon is not
located within a driving area and would therefore create no
vehicular safety problem if placed at 10 feet rather than 14 feet
In response to a question from Mayor Lockwood, the City Clerk
advised the Council that the existing pylon location was
approved by the City Council in 1965 and met the City's setback
requirements at that time. Therefore no setback variance is
required.
Councilman Mertensotto asked Mr. Prokop if he had advised the
developers of Crown Point of the problem, and pointed out to Mr.
PrPkop, that he must comply with the protective covenants. He
advised Mr. Prokop that the City has no jurisdiction over the
Councilman Losleben moved approval of a four foot variance from
the 14 foot minimum sign height requirement, to allow install-
ation of a gas price sign in accordance with the plan submitted
with the variance application, conditioned on removal of the
Amoco Motor Club sign located on the existing pylon, removal of
the perimeter pole sign located at the southwest corner of the
site, and removal of two advertising signs above the pump
islands.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: .5
Nays: 0
CASE #82-01, PROKOP,
Mr. Gary Prokop was present to request approval of an 11 foot—)
VARIANCE
variance from the front yard setback requirement for Lot 26,
Block 1, Crown Point Addition, (871 Crown Circle). The Council
acknowledged that a residential structure had been constructed on
the lot and considered a letter from Mr. Prokop indicating
that he had personally staked the structure himself and was
unaware that the property line and curb line are not one and the
same.
Councilman Mertensotto asked Mr. Prokop if he had advised the
developers of Crown Point of the problem, and pointed out to Mr.
PrPkop, that he must comply with the protective covenants. He
advised Mr. Prokop that the City has no jurisdiction over the
Page No. 1608
February 2, 1982
protective covenants, nor do the covenants supercede the City's
ability to grant a variance.
It was the determination of the Council that no action should
be taken on the application for a variance until the developer
has been.notified of the problem, particularly in view of the
protective. covenants requiring a 30 foot setback from the front
property line.
Mayor Lockwood moved to continue discussion on the application
for a front yard setback variance for 871 Crown Circle to
February 16th, to allow a response from Strub and Associates
prior to City action on the.matter.
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MISCELLANEOUS Councilman Mertensotto asked whether some procedure can be
instituted to avoid problems similar to the Prokop setback
problem. There were several suggestions made by members of
the Council, including the process of inspecting staking prior
to excavation and footings, and requiring greater responsibility
of the excavator.
City Administrator Johnson assured the Council that staff will
attempt to take some corrective measures to eliminate similar
problems in the future.
FEASIBILITY HEARING, Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for the purpose of a public
DUPONT ADDITION, (IMP. hearing on proposed public improvements to serve the Michael
NO. 81, PROJECT NO. 8) DuPont Addition. He turned the meeting over to Public Works
Director Danielson.for a history and explanation of the proposed
improvements.
Public Works Director Danielson advised the Council and audience
that the proposed project would involve the construction of san-
itary sewer and watermain extensions and street, curb and
gutter and storm sewer improvements to serve the Michael DuPont
Addition and,adjacent -areas. He advised that the street con-
struction involves the reconstruction of the existing School
Road (renamed Summit Lane) along with construction of a cul-
de-sac to the west from School Road to serve the eight internal
lots within.the DuPont Addition plat. He pointed out that
construction of the public improvements as proposed in Scheme A
of the feasibility study will provide sanitary sewer and water
services along with the Summit Lane street improvements for two
large lots.which front both on Summit Lane and Walsh Lane. He
further advised that variances would be necessary before either
of the two properties could be divided. He stated that the
sanitary sewer would be available to serve the Evans property.,
westerly of.the plat, if that property were ever to be sub-
divided. Mr. Danielson advised the Council :that under Scheme A
that it is proposed to extend sanitary and storm sewer lines from
the existing termination point at the westerly boundary of the
Dakota's Adults property. Water is proposed to be extended from
Victoria north along Summit Lane. He pointed out that it is not
proposed that Dakota's Adults.be assessed under the proposed
project.
Page No. 1609
February 2, 1982
Mr. Danielson stated that Mr. DuPont, in his negotiations with
the School District, has agreed to construct a sidewalk from
Vi:ctoria to the Mendota School'property, and it is proposed that
the sidewalk be constructed under the improvement project and
assessed to the properties within the DuPont Addition plat.
It is also proposed to extend sanitary sewer and watermains to
the school property under the project in accordance with the
terms of Mr. DuPont's agreement with the School District.
Public Works Director'Danielson advised that the estimated
project cost is $149,000, which would involve an assessment
of approximately $11,000 against each of the platted lots.
He advised that the project could be completed either late fall
of 1982, or in the spring of 1983, which would involve assessing
in 1984. The street assessment would be levied for a period
of 10 years and all underground utilities for 19 years, at an
interest rate to be determined at the time of assessment.
Mayor Lockwood asked for questions and comments ftomthe audience.
Mr. Michael DuPont stated that his agreement was that he would
assume the responsibility for any assessments the School
District might otherwise incur under the project, but that he does
not agree to assume the responsibility for assessments for
improvements which will benefit private properties.
Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that a large gas line
crosses the Evans property and that the property might therefore
never be able to be developed. Mr. DuPont stated that if the
property can be developed in the future; assessments under this
project should be levied against the property. He advised however
that if the Council determines the property cannot be developed,
he would agree to assuming the assessment obligation against the
area within the plat.
Mr. Marty Evans*, owner of 2010 Victoria Road, gave the Council
a history of assessments levied against his property. He stated
that when the plat was originally proposed, Mr. DuPont stated
that there would be no assessments from the project against
any of the private property owners. He pointed out that a high
power gas line crosses his property and.it is therefore
questionable whether the property can ever be developed. He
asked why it is proposed to assess his property and not the
Dako'ta's Adults property. He stated that the project is
being proposed to benefit the DuPont Addition and would only
be to his financial detriment. 1.
Councilman Mertensotto pointed out that easements will be jj
required at the back of Mr. Evans property to accommodate the
extension of sanitary sewer and storm sewer, and asked whether
Mr. Evans would be willing to grant the City the necessary
easements for those utilities. Mr. Evans stated that he is
willing to work with the City as long as the project does not
become a financial burden to him.
Mr. Earl Lynch, 1164 Ohio Street, owner of one of the two
double facing lots, pointed out that there is a sewer line in
Page No. 1610
February 2, 1982
Victoria Road already from which his and his neighbor's property
could be served.- City Engineer Kishel advised that it was
impossible to extend the sanitary sewer line from Victoria
Road to serve the DuPont Addition and adjacent area. He
pointed out that while the properties along Summit Lane could be
served by 'sanitary sewer coming from Victoria Road, it would be
less costly to install the services under the currently
proposed project than constructing an extension at some time
after Summit Road has been upgraded. He also advised that
there is no-current estimate for cost of the public improve-
ments attributable to the two lots on Summit Lane outside of
the plat..
Mr. Lynch stated that he has owned his property for a long time
and not developed it, and if the project is approved and he
subdivides his property at that point he questioned whether
benefits to his property and his neighbors property would be
as great as the benefit to the DuPont Addition. He further
questioned whether he should be required to pay the same
amount as the lots within the plat.
Mr. John LeMay, attorney for the Dakota's Adults, stated that
the Dakota's Adults Board has not yet considered the question
of whether they would grant an easement for construction. He
stated that Dakota's Adults had to extend the sanitary sewer
from Lexington Avenue when its -facility was constructed and
was assessed $18,000 for the extension. He pointed out that
Dakota's Adults is providing one-third of the entire sewer line
to serve the property east of it and feels that the City should
allocate a portion of the $18,.000 Dakota's Adults assessment to
the.DuPont development.
Councilman Hartmann moved that the Amesbury East feasibility
hearing be continued to March 2nd at 8:00 P.M.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
SQUAD CARS Police Chief Thul was present to review and answer any Council
questions on his memo recommending the purchase of two 1982
There being no further questions or comments from the audience,
Councilman Losldben moved that the hearing be closed at 9:08
P.M.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Staff was directed to meet with Mr. DuPont and the private
property owners to resolve any questions.
FEASIBILITY
HEARING, AMESBURY
City Administrator Johnson advised the Council that McNulty
EAST
Construction Company had requested continuation of the continued
Amesbury East feasibility hearing because all parties involved
in the development could not be present this evening. He
further advised that all affected property owners had been
notified of the request.
Councilman Hartmann moved that the Amesbury East feasibility
hearing be continued to March 2nd at 8:00 P.M.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
SQUAD CARS Police Chief Thul was present to review and answer any Council
questions on his memo recommending the purchase of two 1982
Page No. 1611
February 2, 1982
squad cars. He stated that bids had been received through the
Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Group for Ford Fairmonts
at -$7,.979 each and for Ford LTD vehicles at $9,403 each. No
bid's were -submitted in response to a subsequent City bidding
procedure. He indicated that the Fairmont is not an acceptable
vehicle for police use from a size or safety standpoint and
that an additional $700 per vehicle would be required to replace
rollbar/prisoner cages which are presently mounted in the
existing squads. The existing cages could be mounted in the
LTD's. He therefore tticbtrmohded that the Council authorize
the acquisition of two 1982 Ford LTD's.
Councilman Losleben moved to authorize Chief Thul to purchase.
two 1982 LTD squad cars through the Hennepin County Cooperative
Purchasing Group for a unit price of $9,403.00 each.
Councilman Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Dave Zemke and several members of the Cable Advisory
Commission were present to discuss the cable television issue
with the Council. There was considerable discussion over some
of the Joint Powers Agreement conditions and over the activities
of adjoining communities in the cable communications area.
RECESS Mayor Lockwood called a recess at 10:30 P.M. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:45 P.M.
RESIGNATION The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a letter of
resignation from Police Chief Thul.
DEFERRED The Council acknowledged a memo and proposed resolution from the
COMPENSATION City Administrator relative to amendment to the City's
Deferred Compensation Plan.
Councilwoman Witt moved the adoption of Resolution No. 82-12,
"RESOLUTION AMENDING DEFERRED'COMPENSATION PLAN".
Councilman Losleben seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MISCELLANEOUS Public Works Director Danielson reviewed a Mn/DOT letter calling
for plans for the transplanting of 45 trees from Eagan to I-35E at
TH 110 and I-35E at TH 13.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Resolution No
82-13, "RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS".
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged a letter from V. A. Edgerton and others
regarding wood storage and heating equipment.
LIST OF CLAIMS Councilman Hartmann moved approval of the List of Claims dated
February 2, 1982 and totalling $102,049.11.
Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 1612
February 2, 1982
MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged and discussed a letter from the
City Clerk to Carmen Tuminelly and Ru-Car Properties regarding
the delinquent payment of utility hookup charges to the Brooks
Superette/Pepino's structures in Lilydale.
ADJOURN There being no further.business to come before the Council,
Councilman Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Councilwoman Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:19 o'clock P.M.
,,Xathleen- M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
C)
Robert G. Lockwood
Mayor