Loading...
1987-04-21 Joint Council-Park Comm minutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Minutes of the Joint Meeting with City Council and Park & Rec Commission Tuesday, April 21, 1987 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the joint meeting of the Mendota Heights City Council and Park and Recreation Commission was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, April 21, 1987, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, and Hartmann. Councilmember Witt arrived late in the meeting. Parks Commissioners present included Chair Stein, Commissioners Doffing, Katz, and Lachenmayer. Mayor Mertensotto began the meeting by asking City Administrator Frazell to list on the board all of the athletic facility options that had been originally considered in the Tarton-Aschman study. There was then a group discussion clarifying the needs for an athletic complex. Park Chair Stein indicated that the Barton-Aschman study had documented the need for three or four ballfields, a soccer field, parking and a comfort/ storage. It was also noted that a minimum 20-25 acres would be needed on any site. It was noted that several of the sites originally discussed in the Barton-Aschman study, including Wachtler and Perkegwin, are no longer available due to current development. The McCloud/Ahlstrom site was eliminated as being too expensive, and the School Forest site as not readily available and having bad topography for an athletic complex. It was then narrowed down that the two reasonable alternatives are to continue working with School District No. 197 on a site around the Henry Sibley campus, or to consider some of the property owned by developer Jim Riley south of Mendota Heights Road and east of Dodd Road. Councilmember Blesener indicated that she is still in favor of working with the School District on the Sibley campus. Councilmember Cummins said that he had originally supported the concept of working with the School District, but had a problem with the School Board's attitude and approach, and was beginning to question whether or not the two parties could work together. He also indicated that he was bothered by the fact that the contributions from the two parties were growing increasingly unequal, with the City contributing much more than the District. Parks Chair Stein said he thought the School District option was still in the best interest of the City, and said that one of the additional costs of the Riley site was taking this valuable property off the tax roll. He said he thought it was easy to take a negative attitude toward the School District because of the problems, but the School Board was ever changing and that the City could now take a more assertive position in the negotiations. Councilmember Hartmann said that he couldn't support putting over $1,000,000 of City money into the Henry Sibley complex if there was a possibility of the City losing all that investment sometime. He said that he also felt there were many people in West St. Paul who opposed the agreement. Chair Stein responded that he felt the proposal would benefit children from all communities who attend Henry Sibley High School and who are participants in Mend/Eagan athletic programs. It was also noted that the West St. Paul Soccer League would probably use some of the fields. Councilmember Cummins questioned whether it might be possible to consider using a site south of Mendota Heights Road but closer to Dodd Road. Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Court, said that he thought the Henry Sibley approach was bad for both the City and the School District. He highlighted concerns about the District's future financial capability, and whether they could make a commitment to financing the maintenance of the athletic facility. Parks Chair Stein said that he didn't see finance as being a concern by the Board now, and Councilmember Blesener said she felt those concerns could be addressed in the agreement. Parks Commissioner Doffing said that even without School District financial participation he still felt the Henry Sibley site was the best of all the alternatives. Councilmember Blesener said that she did feel the City should take a hard look at the alternatives of both the Henry Sibley and Riley sites. It was agreed that the City staff should solicit a proposal from Barton-Aschman Associates, the City's parks planner, to do an analysis of the Riley site, including a point by point comparison of the pros and cons of the Riley versus the Henry Sibley site. There was some discussion of the issue of consumption of alcohol in the athletic facility. There was a general concensus that it would be acceptable to ban alcohol use, but an acknowledgement that realistically people were going to be consuming some alcohol. Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M. ATTEST: Charles E. E. Mertensotto Mayor Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator