Loading...
1988-07-05 Council minutesPage No. 2377 July 5, 1988 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 5, 1988 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener and Witt. Councilmember Hartmann had notified the Council that he would be out of town. Councilmember Cummins had notified the Council that he would be late. AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 2 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1 Mertensotto CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Witt moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the minutes of the June 21st meeting with correction. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. Adoption of Resolution No. 88 -37, "RESOLUTION AMENDING SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES FOR 1988," implementing mid -year pay equity adjustments. b. Approval of CAO Case No. 88 -06, Virnig, approving the modified site plan for construction of a storage shed at 1650 Mayfield Heights Road, along with waiver of the $100 CAO fee. c. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the May 14th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Page No. 2378 July 5, 1988 d. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the June 28 Planning Commission meeting. e. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for June. f. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated July 5, 1988 and attached hereto. g. Approval of the list of claims dated July 5, 1988 and totalling $209,020.97. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 LOGO Graphic Artist Robyn Huspek presented a number of logo alternatives for Council discussion. It was the general consensus of Council that Ms. Huspek should focus on MH as predominant with trees as a shadow in the background. T.H. 149 RIGHT-OF-WAY Mn/DOT Project Engineer Paul Kachelmyer was present to discuss the ultimate use or release of the Highway 149 right-of-way. Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator and a memo from Mr. Kachelmyer regarding release of the right- of-way. Mr. Kachelmyer stated that Mn/DOT wants input from the City before making a final decision. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he feels that the ultimate use and design and layout of the Mendota Plaza, which has a new owner, is directly related to this issue. He pointed out that the City has talked about having a TH 149 overpass over TH 110 in the past but now Mn/DOT has indicated there is a big reduction in traffic on 110. He pointed out that the Council is faced with many unknowns regarding overall traffic on TH 149, including development of the southeast area of the City and the impact of future development in Eagan. Mr. Kachelmyer stated that Mn/DOT doesn't anticipate ever building an intersection on the right-of-way, and that it doesn't fit in with the present policy of Mn/Dot or the Metropolitan Council and Mn/DOT is looking at releasing the right-of-way unless PUBLIC COMMENTS Page No. 2379 July 5, 1988 convinced otherwise. He informed Council that Mn /DOT only holds an easement on the land for highway purposes and that there is still underlying fee ownership. He pointed out that state law stipulates that property does not automatically revert to the underlying owner but that he may buy back the easement rights at 95% of the present market value of the property. He then discussed the several options presented in his letter and stated that Mn /DOT needs to know the City's position as to release of the land. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether Mn /DOT will cooperate in providing information to the City's TH 149 committee if it is reactivated, and Mr. Kachelmyer indicated that it would. With respect to option one, Councilmember Biesener asked whether Mn /Dot would just be giving the City easement rights if the City chooses to build the road, and if there would still be underlying ownership, or whether the City would have to buy the 5 %. Mr. Kachelmyer responded that if the City wanted all of the right -of -way and used only 66" for right -of -way purposes, it would have to buy the rest of the land. It was Council consensus that a new committee should be appointed to look at all issues relating to the right -of -way and the 110/149 area. Council directed the Administrator to report back with a suggested committee consisting of some of the former TH 149 committee and the Downtown Task Force members. Councilmember Cummins arrived at 7:53 P.M. Mrs. Joanne Birnbaum, 1721 Victoria, stated that she lives across from the Bream development and that lots of trees and shrubs have been removed right across from her home. She asked whether a hedge of lilacs or some other plantings could be planted to provide a natural buffer and also whether a similar buffer can be provided for the park area. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the City public works crew is supposed to remove MINNESOTA KNITTING Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LIQUOR LICENSE Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-22, WIRT Page No. 2380 July 5, 1988 some of the brush and trees at the intersection with Marie. He stated that he has spoken to Mrs. Birnbaum.Wconcern is that when a wind comes out of the east there will be a dustbowl and she wants to know what to anticipate next. Public Works Director Danielson stated that the area is intended to be seeded. He also noted that the City has hired a landscape architect to come up with a plan for the parks, including the Victoria Highlands park, and that he will pass on the concern about a buffer to the architect. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a building permit for Minnesota Knitting Mills to allow construction of a 9,620 square foot addition to their facility located on Mendota Heights Road. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from the City Clerk regarding the LAMA Corporation's application for off-sale liquor license to open an MGM Liquor Warehouse operation in the Mendota Plaza. After brief discussion, Councilmember Witt moved approval of the issuance of an off- sale liquor license to the LAMA Corpor- ation, d.b.a. MGM Liquor Warehouse, to operate an MGM facility in the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center, subject to approval of the license by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Mr. & Mrs. John Wirt, 1395 Farmdale Road, was present to request approval of a sideyard setback variance to allow a garage addition 24 feet from the side property line. Councilmember Cummins asked Mr. Wirt whether he had checked with anyone on the legal status, since there are covenants which prohibit structures from being closer than 30 feet from the property line. Page No. 2381 July 5, 1988 Mr. Wirt responded that there is no neighborhood association, but that he has the approval of his neighbors. Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. & Mrs. Wirt that the City Council will in no way take action that would affect the covenants and that the covenants are - private and cannot be superceded by Council action. After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to approve a six foot sideyard setback variance to allow construction of a garage addition 24 feet from the side property line at 1395 Farmdale Road. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. CAO 88-04, Mr. William Huestis, 649 Sibley Memorial HUESTIS Highway, was present to request approval of a critical area variance to allow construction of an addition on the rear of his home. Mr. Huestis stated that his home is 22 feet from the bluffline now and that the addition would be 16 feet from the bluff. Responding to a caution from Mayor Mertensotto, Mr. Huestis stated that he understands that the City can give no guarantees that the addition won't slip down the bluff, and that he will be taking significant precautions during construction. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a critical area six foot variance from the existing rear yard setback at 649 Sibley Memorial Highway to allow construction of an addition at the rear of the home. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88-23, Mr. Paul Beckmann was present to request BECKMANN approval of a wetlands permit to allow construction of a home within 90 feet of the pond on Lot 9, Block 1, The Ponds of Mendota Heights. After discussion, Councilmember Witt moved approval of a wetlands permit to allow construction of a home 90 feet from the pond on Lot 9, Block 1, The Ponds of Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88 -25, CANNIFF Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 EUGENIA STREET VACATION HEARING CITY HALL FURNITURE Page No. 2382 July 5, 1988 Mendota Heights. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of a wetlands permit for Lot 5, Block 1, The Ponds of Mendota Heights, to allow construction of a new home 72 feet from the pond. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on the vacation of the Eugenia Street right -of- way. Planning Commissioner Burt Anderson stated that he cannot see a need for vacation of Eugenia at this time. He pointed out that the adjacent land has an average depth of 500 feet and if Council vacates Eugenia, the City might be locked into the formerly proposed PUD development. He felt that the 70% lot area provision in the Zoning Ordinance can be applied to the Peyer lot split request and she would not therefore need the requested vacation area to accomplish a lot split. He informed Council that the Commission tabled the lot split request until Council takes action on the vacation and until the Commission can see a plan for developing the lot. He pointed out that the City Planner has suggested retaining a 20' pathway easement on the south portion of the right -of -way and the Engineer has recommended retaining a 10' utility easement over the north portion. He felt that the request is untimely and suggested that Council deny the request. It was noted that Ms. Peyer, who had requested the vacation, was not yet present, therefore further discussion was continued until Ms. Peyer arrives. Interior Designer Suzanne Ilten was present to inform Council on bids received for the purchase of furniture for the new City Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 EUGENIA STREET CASE NO. 88-15, PERRON LOT SPLIT Page No. 2383 July 5, 1988 Hall. Ms. Ilten stated that 9 companies requested bid documents, including Mendota Heights resident Jean Freeman, and that the documents were sent to all who requested them. She then reviewed and discussed the bids with Council, and informed Council that the Herman Miller Encore furniture will be purchased under the Hennepin County purchasing agreement from Facilities Systems, Inc., which is the only local vendor of the furniture. Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize purchase of City Hall furniture as follows: Westin-Nielson and Gilbert furnishings from the Pink Companies/Hartzel, for $22,571.40; Howe, Smokador, peter Pepper Products and Koch and Lowy furnishings from General Office Products for $9,031.51; Harman and Millwork items from Metro Systems for $4,973; Herman Miller seating from Facilities Systems, Inc., for $29,150.55, and Herman Miller Encore for $30,266.43 plus installation. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Mr. Wayne Schwanz, present for the Eugenia Street vacation hearing, informed Council that he has tried to contact Ms. Peyer and been notified that she is out of town and will not be present this evening. Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be continued to 8:15 P.M. on July 19th. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged receipt of a report from Engineer Klayton Eckles and a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Philip Goldman, 1926 South Lane, relative to the continued discussion on Mr. & Mrs. John Perron's application to divide 1940 South Lane and create a new 85 foot lot. Mayor Mertensotto stated that independent of the location of the property, he is concerned that over the years Council has established criteria for dividing existing lots. He stated that he looked at the property this evening and while there is no question a home could be built on the Page No. 2384 July 5, 1988 proposed new lot, the question is what criteria should be used in considering applications to divide larger lots like this. Councilmember Blesener felt that the question should be whether or not something could be built which is comparable with the general character of the neighborhood. She felt that in this case that test could be met, and noted that Planner Dahlgren considered there to be a hardship because the location of the existing 'homes preclude making the proposed lot larger. Attorney Hart pointed out that the location of the homes cannot be considered a hardship criteria because a hardship cannot be created by the owner or his predecessor; the question to be considered is whether the applicant should be entitled to subdivision knowing when he bought the property that it could not be divided under the City's zoning regulations. Councilmember Cummins felt that Council should consider that there are many large lots in the community, the owners of which will be looking to subdivide in the future and would look on Council action on this case as precedent setting. Mr. Roger Quick, son-in-law of the Perrons, stated that with respect to the Perron lot, the topography presents a physical hardship and the 20 foot grade difference makes the lot a maintenance hardship. Mrs. Perron asked why some variances are granted for substandard lots and some are not. She felt that she and Mr. Perron had complied with everything the City has asked and that the lot presents economic and topography hardships. She also pointed out that they have submitted a drawing of a house which can be built on the lot. Mrs. Perron stated that Mr. Koppen has been granted two variances on his lot, never met with the Planning Commission and was granted variances to build and sell a home. She stated that she and her husband are having a hard time understanding why their request is different. Page No. 2385 July 5, 1988 Mr. Quick stated that Council has looked at the house plan that was drawn for the lot and see that the house would be good on the lot. He felt that if it can be shown that a house can contribute to the neighborhood, then it should be approved on that basis. Councilmember Witt expressed concern that if the request were approved it would be setting a precedent Council is not prepared for. Councilmember Cummins stated that if this was simply an individual case, the applicants have done a good job; that if it was just this one case in a vacuum he would like to approve it. He felt however, that approval of the application would set an undesirable precedent with broad implications for the City. Councilmember Cummins moved to deny the application. The motion died for lack of a second. Mrs. Perron asked 85 and 90 foot frontage lots were approved in Copperfield and not for her lot, she also asked why Koppen's lot and Spring Creek Acres were approved and her request is not granted. She stated that Council required Spring Creek Acre's lots and the Koppen lot to only be 100 feet at the building setback. Mrs. Joseph Schuster stated that she would hate to see Council deny this because Mr. Schuster's application for subdivision was denied. She stated that she has seen many lots split where there were no criteria yet her application was turned down and now this application may be turned down. Mr. Philip Goldman stated that he would hate to see a decision continued to another meeting. He pointed out that he has done a lot of work to have things done as they should be done and that if a new standard is to be whether or not a house can be built on a proposed lot the Ordinance should be changed. He pointed to case law, including the Van Landschoot case, which has set precedent. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 88 -19, C.G. REIN Page No. 2386 July 5, 1988 Councilmember Blesener suggested that it seems that decisions are made based on whether there is organized opposition to a request or not. She felt that the matter should be continued and that Council review the standard on subdividing existing lots. Councilmember Blesener moved that the matter be continued to the August 2nd meeting. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Staff was directed to research the Koppen, Spring Creek Acres and Copperfield files and report at the August 2nd meeting. Council acknowledged a report from Adminis- trator Frazell relative to the C.G. Rein proposal for a 106 unit apartment complex on Outlot A of the Mendakota Estates P.U.D. Mr. Ted Zinner, representing C.G. Rein, reviewed a revised site plan for the Council and audience. Responding to a question from Mayor Mertensotto relative to the 10% park dedication requirement, Mr. Zinner stated that the Park Commission found that the design of the walkway was advantageous and unanimously recommended approval of the 1.67 acre dedication and the plan shown to the City. Mr. Zinner stated that the complex has been moved back 100 feet from Dodd Road as requested, and that the Park Commission and Rein's traffic engineer have found that the driveway access should be from the project directly to Dodd Road. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that she was very strong in her comments at the last meeting that the buildings be set back 100 feet from the Dodd Road right -of -way, yet the plan shows the buildings being 100 feet from the paved surface. Councilmember Witt pointed to her concern that the buildings should be at the same setback as the houses on the along the west side of Dodd. Mr. Zinner responded that the developer is faced with two different noise sources, one at the back (NSP substation) and one at the front (Dodd Road), and that if the buildings are moved back it will wreak Page No. 2387 July 5, 1988 havoc on the residents of the complex. He stated that the buildings are placed on the plan in a location that will keep them away from aggravating noises and that the proposal meets all of the criteria of the ordinance. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that Council talked in terms of setback from the right-of-way and that was Council's intent. She tated that her thoughts in referring the plan to the Park Commission was that the Commission should look at what the City would ever do with the narrow strip of land proposed as dedication. She indicated that while she can see that the Commission would like the extra land she cannot see any concern over the roadway crossing the piece of land. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that direct access to Dodd is hazardous now and direct access from the proposed project to would cause nothing but problems. He felt that a single access point at Mendakota Drive is very important. Mr. Glen Van Wormer, traffic engineer for the project, stated that Mayor Mertensotto is correct that it is desirable to consolidate access points and bring all traffic to a single intersection so that in the future some type of control device can be installed. He suggested that if consolidation is desired, all existing driveways must be brought to the access point or the problem will be compounded. He stated that 2/3 of the traffic from the site will probably want to go to 1-494, making right turns out of the site and left turns in. Councilmember Witt asked Mr. Van Wormer what the County standard is for the limit on access points for heavily travelled roads. Mr. Van Wormer responded that the limit is generally 300 to 600 feet and in some instances a quarter-mile, but in that instance there would be control signals. Mr. Howard Bream stated that as the developer of the single family area of Mendakota Estates he opposes using Mendakota Drive as the access to the Page No. 2388 July 5, 1988 apartments and felt that the access points should be separated. Mayor Mertensotto stated that his concern is having another access point at Dodd and felt that the point of entrance must line up with Hokah where the intersection can be controlled. Mr. Zinner responded that this would not work and that as it is proposed, the entrance can have two lanes exiting from the property, one for left turns and one for right turns. Councilmember Blesener stated that she needs information on the proposed resolution he prepared, specifically item 5. She stated that she had come to terms with the fact that what was done was done and the way the resolution was drafted, the whole issue is opened again. She asked whether Council would be making a finding that the proposal is consistent with what was approved two years ago. Attorney Hart responded that the primary finding is that the proposal is consistent with what was already approved, and that item 5 is not critical to the resolution. Councilmember Blesener stated that as far as this proposal goes, she feels the plan is at the same point it was at a month ago: the access must be from Mendakota Drive and the setback must be 100 feet from the Dodd Road right-of-way. Councilmember Witt felt that the setback should be the same as the existing homes. She also stated that she wants to see the massiveness of the structures reduced. Mr. Dale Johnson stated that the homes are set back 140 feet from the centerline of Dodd. With respect to the open space proposal, Mayor Mertensotto felt that the function of the park is passive open space and that the City would be buying a maintenance headache that has no real public purpose. Councilmember Blesener stated that perhaps the City could do something with the land but that crossing the narrow parcel with a Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 2389 July 5, 1988 drive will not disrupt any potential park development. She also stated that she is not prepared to adopt the proposed resolution as submitted. Councilmember Cummins agreed and stated that access should be from Mendakota Drive and the setback should be 100 feet from the right -of -way. Mr. Keith Heaver, owner of a lot in Mendakota Estates, stated that Rein has hired a traffic expert and Council should listen to his recommendation. Mrs. Mary Lou Johnson stated that she has lived on Dodd Road for 17 years and that the traffic problem will not go away. She felt that adding the apartment will only make the congestion worse and using Mendakota Drive as the access will help reduce the potential problem. Mr. Van Wormer responded that it is an excellent idea to consolidate an access point where there is a lot of space to do so but that there are many driveways and commercial drives along Dodd in the area and he does not believe there is a way to consolidate all of the existing entrances. After additional discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved to table action to the July 19th meeting. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. With respect to the proposed resolution, Councilmember Blesener stated that she feels like she is being asked to approve something that she voted against two years ago and that she could not support the resolution as written. Mr. Bernard Friel suggested that he feels the Council in fact rezoned the property with a majority vote rather than a 4/5 vote as is required for rezoning by statute. He stated that while he recognizes that the Council acted on the basis of a PUD he believes the such action cannot be taken without a 4/5 vote and that it is not too late to overturn action taken two years ago. Page No. 2390 July 5, 1988 RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:50. The meeting was reconvened at 10:00. CURLEY ADDITION PARK Mr. Dave Ayres and Mr. Chris Schneeman were present to request the Curley Addition request for tot lot improvements on Lot 10. Mr. Ayres reviewed the last Council discussion on the matter as well as the Park Commission discussion. He informed Council that he has been negotiating with Rainbow Playground Equipment and has received a figure of $6,700 for the proposed play structure, that the neighborhood will do all construction, including putting in the sod and pea rock and alpine currant. He also stated that Rainbow carries a $1 million liability coverage on the play structure. He stated that if some of the frills are removed, the total cost for the project would be about $12,000. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Park Commission has indicated they would agree to expend $14,000 from the Park Fund but since this is a tot lot concept it must be determined whether there is Council support. He expressed concern that there is no neighborhood association and that there must be such a legal entity which the City could enter into a developers' agreement with and to deal with if problems occur. Mr. Ayres responded the he believes there was an association formulated some time ago and that it could be revived. Councilmember Cummins suggested that Mr. Ayres contact the Secretary of State's Office to see if the association is still incorporated. Councilmember Witt stated that if Council approves Lot 10 for a tot lot, it would be approving a substandard park and would be taking on unnecessary liability. She reviewed minutes from similar discussions in 1975 and 1984, and felt that although there are now different Council and Park Commission members involved, she does not think the City should compromise its park plan. She felt that it would be appropriate for the City to sell the lot to Page No. 2391 July 5, 1988 the neighborhood and they could develop the lot and that the City should not feel compelled to right a developer's wrong. Councilmember Blesener stated that the matter was discussed at the Council /Park Commission joint meeting and the discussion was that the City would take part of the burden and the neighborhood should take part of the burden. She felt that if the neighborhood wants to enter into a contract, the request should be approved, and that Council should acknowledge that this will be a vest - pocket, non - conforming park that would enhance the neighborhood and would have equipment that the whole City could use. She added that she is willing to support a small neighborhood park area but is concerned that most of the City parks have substandard equipment. She stated that she would like to scale down the play area and make it more modest to compare better with other parks, suggesting that the neighborhood come up with something no bigger than what is in the other neighborhood parks. Councilmember Blesener suggested that Mr. Ayres contact the Mendota School for information on the school's play structure. She further suggested that City staff should handle the culvert, grading and sodding work and establish a mat to be seeded, that the City should contribute $4,000 in time and material and another $4,000 for play equipment. As the result of the discussion, staff was directed to work towards an $8,000 cap on the City contribution, one -half of which is to be available to the Association for the purchase of playground equipment. Councilmember Witt stated that she believes the investment would be an inappropriate expenditure of City funds. PARK CONTRACTS Council acknowledged a report from Administrator Frazell regarding a contract with Barton- Aschman for preparation of the park landscape plan and preparation of master facility and layout plans for the Hagstrom -King, Victoria Highlands and Mendakota Estates PUD parks. The contract Page No. 2392 July 5, 1988 cost for the landscape plan is $13,850, with an additional $6,800 cost for the master plans. Councilmember Blesener pointed out that everything is related to concept plans, not construction drawings, and expressed concern about whether the end product will be worth $20,000. Administrator Frazell responded that it is a very well - defined program, and that while Barton - Aschman will not produce bid documents, the City Engineering department will be able to use the information to develop specifications. Councilmember Witt moved to approve the contract with Barton - Aschman Associates for preparation of park landscape plans and neighborhood park master plans. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 MASAC Council acknowledged and discussed a report from Administrator Frazell as a follow -up to the June 18th MASAC meeting. MASAC representative Bernie Friel was present for the discussion. HUBER DRIVE /MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 After discussion, Council directed the administrator to send a letter to MASAC indicating that the position previously taken by the City is based on presumptions that may be inaccurate, and that the City reserves the right to amend its position in the future. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 88 -40, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE SOUTHEAST AREA OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS (HUBER DRIVE AND MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD, IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 1)," awarding the contract to F.M. Frattalone Excavating and Grading, Inc. for their low bid of $585,505.59. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. VISITATION DRIVE Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 BRIDGEVIEW SHORES Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ASSESSMENT ROLLS Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 2393 July 5, 1988 Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 88 -41, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING VISITATION DRIVE CONSTRUCTION," regarding construction of a turn lane at Visitation Drive. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Council acknowledged the plans and specifications for construction of the Bridgeview Shores 1st Addition improvements. Councilmember Blesener asked whether the trail along the east end of the soccer field can be extended so that it can be travelled, or at least get it back to a street. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 88 -42, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 1ST ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 88, PROJECT NO. 1), the plans to be adjusted to include the trail extension. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Council acknowledged receipt of the proposed assessment rolls for Park Place and The ponds of Mendota Heights & Rolling Woods additions. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 88 -43, "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION AND ADJACENT AREA IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 12)," and RESOLUTION NO. 88 -44, "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE PONDS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, ROLLING WOODS ADDITION, ROLLING WOODS 2ND ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREA IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 9)." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. CITY HALL Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 1989 BUDGET MISCELLANEOUS ADJOURN Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 2394 July 5, 1988 Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Administrator regarding installation of a drainage basin and piping in the upper parking lot of new City Hall. Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize a change order for the City Hall contract with Joseph Construction for installation of an upper parking lot catch basin and piping in the amount of $4,785. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. It was the consensus of Council that Council hold a budget workshop on Tuesday, July 12th at 7:30 P.M. Council acknowledged a form of the resolution awarding contracts for and authorized its use proposed revised accepting bids and public improvements in the future. There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Witt moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:58 o'clock P.M. Ka leen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: 174 Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor