1990-06-26 Planning Comm MinutesDRAFT
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 26, 1990
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the City Hall Council Chambers,
1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the meeting to
order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present:
Morson, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Duggan, Dreelan and Tilsen. Commissioner
Koll was excused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim
Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder, Planning
Consultant Phil Carlson and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Commissioner Duggan moved to approve the May 22,
1990 Minutes.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: Dreelan
CASE NO. 90-22 Mr. Klayton Eckles was present to discuss his
ECKLES request for a twenty-two foot (22') front yard
variance to construct a new home at 2005 Victoria
Road. Mr. Eckles explained that the home
immediately to the west of his land is an older
home that was the original home on the subdivision
and is setback fifty-seven feet (57') from the
property line. Mr. Eckles also stated that he has
received signatures of consent from neighbors to
the east and west of his property.
Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend to the City
Council that they approve a twenty-two foot (22')
front yard variance.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
HEARING Mr. Gerald Frisch, 960 Caren Road, was present to
CASE NO. 90-18 discuss his request for a conditional use permit.
FRISCH - Mr. Frisch explained that in 1980, he received a
CUP conditional use permit to construct a pool and pool
house in his rear yard. Mr. Frisch explained that
the City Council agreed to allow him to install
landscaping around the pool in lieu of fencing.
Mr. Frisch stated that Dakota County permitted him
to encroach on their right-of-way by installing the
landscaping. Mr. Frisch stated that he has talked
to James Backstrom, County Attorney, and they are
presently working out an agreement to get
permission to install the fence on the County
right-of-way and at such time that Victoria Road is
improved, the fence would have to be removed off
the right-of-way at his own expense. Mr. Frisch
stated that he does not feel that there is a
problem since he is working on an agreement with
the County. Mr. Frisch stated that he thought that
he had permission to install the fence when he
received the original conditional use permit and
that is why he has already installed the fence
posts.
In response to a question from Chairperson Morson,
Mr. Frisch explained that Mr. Hess lives to the
south of the common property line and that there is
a chain link fence along Mr. Hess's property line
and that his fence would juncture with Mr. Hess's.
He explained that the proposed fence would run
parallel with Victoria Road inside the existing
landscaping.
In response to a question from Chairperson Morson,
Mr. Frisch stated that the fence would be in the
County right-of-way. Mr. Frisch explained again
that the fence would be separated from the road by
a mature hedge.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the County gave
Mr. Frisch permission to install the hedge and Mr.
Frisch answered yes. Commissioner Duggan
questioned Mr. Frisch is he had any documentation
stating the agreement between Mr. Frisch and Dakota
County regarding the landscaping. Mr. Frisch
stated that the County had no objections as long as
the hedge is not permanent. Mr. Frisch stated that
he will be receiving a letter from the County.
Public Works Director Danielson briefly explained
that Victoria Road will be turned back to the City
from the County and that in anticipation of that,
the City had designated Victoria Road as an M.S.A.
road.
Commissioner Dreelan questioned if the fence could
be moved in so that it is not in the right-of-way.
Mr. Frisch stated that he would like to leave the
fence where it is proposed and that he does not
feel that the fence would be detrimental to the
neighborhood. He further stated that he finds this
whole procedure burdensome.
Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting for
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
public comments.
Commissioner Dwyer formally accepted a letter
submitted by Mr. Hess, neighbor of Mr. Frisch,
stating that he has no problem with the fence
installation if it is not installed along the
border of his property located at 1645 South
Lexington.
Mr. Christian, Lilac Lane, stated that he has no
problem with the fence.
Mr. Don Lewis, lives across the street from Mr.
Frisch, questioned if the fence will be behind the
hedge. Mr. Frisch answered that it would be. Mr.
Lewis stated that he has no problem with the fence.
Ms. Anita Stockton, 969 Caren Road, stated that she
has no objections to the proposed fence.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the drawing
submitted to the Planning Commission shows that the
proposed fence will be constructed on Mr. Frisch's
property line. Mr. Frisch stated that the plan is
incorrect.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to close the public
hearing.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend to the City
Council that they approve a conditional use permit
to construct a fence inside the maple hedge
conditioned upon:
1. Mr. Frisch provide the City Council with
a written agreement from Dakota County
approving the construction.
2. That a survey be submitted showing the proposed
fence location and existing facilities
accurately.
3. That Mr. Frisch agree to remove the landscaping
and fencing at no cost to County or City at
such time as the City of County improves the
roadway.
4. That the existing hedge be maintained.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 1, Morson
HEARING
CASE NO. 90 -19
DELTA ENVIRON.
CONSULTANTS
Mr. Craig Anderson, representing Delta
Environmental Consultants, was present to discuss
their request for an accessory structure in a B -2
Zone to be constructed at the Amoco station located
at 2030 Dodd Road. He explained that the accessory
structure CUP is being proposed as part of a
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency treatment system
to clean up the site due to gas leakage from the
old underground storage tanks. Mr. Anderson
explained that the accessory structure would house
a recovery well to pump and treat groundwater,
remove the gas and discharge the waste into the
sanitary sewer system.
Mr. Anderson stated that the system could be
running for three to five years. Commissioner
Duggan stated his concerns with the unusual noise
and vibrations caused by the system pumping. Mr.
Anderson stated that they are estimating to pump
one gallon per minute.
In response to a question from Commissioner
Dreelan, Mr. Anderson stated that the decision to
dismantle the accessory structure would have to be
made by the owner of the station.
Commissioner Duggan stated his concerns with the
emission of fumes. Mr. Anderson stated that that
area is regulated by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency and that everything they do will be
in compliance with their regulations. Mr. Anderson
stated that there are annual testings done on the
equipment. He stated that they would report to the
City on the sewer discharge and that they could
include the annual testings with the report on the
sewer discharge.
In response to a question from Commission Tilsen,
Mr. Anderson stated that once the contamination is
below the MPCA standards the wells and pump would
be abandoned according to the Department of Health
standards.
Commissioner Dreelan questioned where the structure
will be placed on the land. Mr. Anderson stated
that they will be meet the City requirements on
setbacks. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned how
the creek, near McDonald's, will be affected. Mr.
Anderson stated that he is not sure what the
completed depth of the well will be. He explained
1
that the reason why they are installing this system
is so that they do not impact the creek.
Commissioner Dwyer questioned if Delta
Environmental Consultants could provide the City
with a Certificate of Insurance showing proof of
insurance. Mr. Anderson stated that they would.
Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting to the
public. There was no one present to discuss this
matter.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to close the public
hearing.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend to the City
Council that they approve the conditional use
permit conditioned upon:
1. That the structure meet the setback
requirements.
2. That the building be used only for pumping for
the treatment of ground water.
3. That the building be removed after the
treatment is completed.
Commissioner Dwyer offered a friendly amendment
stating the Delta Environmental Consultants submit
to the City a Certificate of Insurance.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
HEARING Mr. and Mrs. Jack Sjoholm, 1161 Delaware Avenue,
CASE NO. 90-20 were present discuss their request for a
SJOHOLM conditional use permit to construct a six foot (6')
CUP solid board fence along their property line
abutting Wentworth Avenue to provide screening and
abatement of traffic noise. Mrs. Sjoholm explained
that they have modified the plans from the original
design and that the Commission should review the
plans showing a pencil line indicating the location
of the fence. She stated that they are now seeking
approval for the fence location furthest from
Wentworth Avenue. Mrs. Sjoholm explained that the
fence line meanders through existing trees and is
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
forty -three feet (43') from the centerline at its
closet location and forty -eight feet (48') at the
furthest location. She stated that they want to
save as many trees and vegetation as possible.
Mrs. Sjoholm submitted pictures for the Planning
Commission to review.
After a brief discussion complimenting the
Sjoholm's on their design, Chairperson Morson
opened the meeting to the public. There was no one
present to discuss this matter.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public
hearing.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend that the
City Council grant a conditional use permit for a
fence conditioned on:
1. That the fence be within the pine trees.
2. That the approval be for the penciled line on
the site plan at a range of forty -three feet
(43') to forty -eight feet (48') from the
centerline of Wentworth Avenue.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 1, Morson
CASE NO. 90 -21
BATESVILLE
CASKET COMPANY
LOT SPLIT
AND VARIANCES
Mr. Thomas Owens, Attorney, and Mr. Bruce Jones,
representing Batesville Casket Company, were
present to discuss a request for a lot split and
two side yard variances in order to construct an
office /warehouse on Northland Drive at Highway 55
on lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza.
Mr. Owens briefly explained who owns the land and
why Batesville Casket Company is looking to
relocate their company. He explained that the
facility will be constructed on Lot 4 and that Lot
3 would remain vacant for future development. Mr.
Owens stated that Batesville Casket Company does
not employ many people. He further explained that
the impact on traffic will be minimal since there
will be roughly 4 to 5 trucks per day. Mr. Owens
briefly discussed the shared driveway concept and
noted several advantages for the shared driveway.
Mr. Owens explained that the driveway will run
right along the new property boundary. Mr. Owens
explained how maintenance costs would be shared.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan,
Mr. Owens stated that a driveway easement could be
established to be sure that there is a sharing of
maintenance costs, rebuilding costs and that each
company maintain liability insurance, etc.
Chairperson Morson stated that he has concerns for
the building being to crowded to the west and that
a common driveway is a safety hazard.
Mr. Bruce Jones presented revised drawings showing
elevations and site sections. Mr. Jones briefly
explained the grade change on Lot 3 and that it
creates an accessibility problem. He explained
that because of the grade change there is really no
option but to have a shared driveway. Mr. Jones
explained that Lot 4 is the preferable site for
exposure and accessibility. He explained that
Batesville Casket is requiring to have three docks
and one drive in door. Mr. Jones explained that
the docks would be along 1-494 and that they would
berm and screen the truck area. He stated that
they would maintain aesthetically the driveway.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan,
Mr. Jones stated that they would create berms that
could be four feet (4') high. He explained that
the natural slope of the freeway cut is basically
shielding the site. Mr. Jones stated that they
would be happy to provide as much vegetation as
possible to screen the wall.
Commissioner Tilsen questioned how the trucks can
back into the docks. Mr. Jones stated that they
would have to pave part of their future driveway in
to the adjacent site and that they would extend the
driveway easement to have the best truck backing
access.
Commissioner Duggan questioned how essential future
expansion is, Mr. Jones stated that it is the key
part to their program. Commissioner Duggan stated
that the concrete is not pleasing because the
building is too large. Chairperson Morson stated
that there is enough space available on the lot to
preclude any variances. He stated that there is a
safety concern on the east side of the building.
He further stated that he is concerned with the
trucks on the driveway in relation to the parking
lot being so close to the driveway. Public Works
Director Danielson stated that he sees no problem
with the parking lot design.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the building could
moved further east. Mr. Jones stated that there is
an NSP easement and severe grade problems that make
a portion of Lot 3 unbuildable. Chairperson Morson
stated that he agrees with the Planner that the
building is too large for the property.
Chairperson Morson stated that with respect to the
variance requests there is no hardship.
Mr. Jones briefly discussed the color schemes. He
stated that they are planning natural colors with
accent bands that are intermediate.
There was a brief discussion regarding the Planning
Commission's overall concern about the building
being too large for the site. The Planning
Commission further discussed their concerns
relating to the parking along the shared entrance
drive.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to grant the lot split and
the two variances according to the plans submitted
and P-3 and P-4 as well as the landscape plans and
line back up plans.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 3, Krebsbach, Morson, Duggan
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Motion fails.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the
City Council grant the lot division as requested
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the
City Council grant a side yard setback variance to
allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4 and twenty
foot (20') side yard setback variance to allow a
future building expansion along Trunk Highway 55.
Commissioner Duggan further recommended that the
Council should look at shifting the building to
reduce the need for a variance.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
) NAYS: 2, Krebsbach, Morson
CASE NO.
Cs:7,y-N4c.,V
(
A brief recess was called at 10:05 o'clock P.M.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:12 o'clock P.M.
90-03 Chairperson Morson stated that he would like to
commend Commissioners Tilsen and Dwyer for the
great deal of time they spent in the staff meeting
regarding the Phase II of Kensington. Chairperson
Morson then turned the meeting over to Vice Chair
Dwyer.
Mr. Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation, reviewed the
updated plans dated June 22, 1990. He explained
the changes in the setback of the garages. He
further explained that the buildings surrounding
the park have been adjusted by using a sixteen unit
building instead of two eight unit buildings. Mr.
Putnam stated that they have reduced the ponding
areas and that the recreational building has been
moved. He explained that they have shifted
buildings along the freeway to add more space.
Mr. Putnam showed the Devonwood project in
Bloomington in comparison of clustering which is
much tighter in Bloomington than what is proposed
in Mendota Heights. Mr. Putnam explained that
there are no places where window exposure and
garages less than twenty feet (20') separation. He
explained that it is mostly corner relationships
that are less than standard.
Mr. Putnam showed the revised bermings along
Mendota Heights Road. He explained that the berms
would be five to eight feet tall. Commissioner
Dwyer questioned the size of the mature trees that
will be planted. Mr. Putnam stated that they would
be four to six feet and that the pine trees could
be twelve to twenty feet. In response to a
question from Commissioner Dwyer, Mr. Putnam
stated that the phasing of landscape begins when
the homes are started and that the irrigation is
installed first. He stated that sod may be last.
Mr. Putnam reviewed the elevations of the berms
along 1-494. He explained that the berms would be
eighteen feet. Mr. Putnam stated that you could
see the top of garages and the second floor from
the freeway. Mr. Putnam explained that the berms
on the private road would be nine feet and that
there would be plantings on top of the berms.
Commissioner Duggan questioned where the state
fence is located on the land, Mr. Putnam answered
that it is 2/3 the way of the slope. Commissioner
different grades of siding used in construction.
Commissioner Duggan questioned the minimum
distances and how many deviations there are between
buildings and garages and parking to buildings.
Mr. Putnam explained that many of the deviations
are at a corner, porch, access point where there
are no windows or views.
Commissioner Dwyer briefly discussed the
prohibition of long term rental. He stated that
the City Attorney responded, using Attorney-Client
privileged memorandum, that the City cannot
restrict long term rental property. Commissioner
Dwyer then asked if Kathleen Connolly, attorney
representing the residents if she had any
questions.
Ms. Connolly questioned the setbacks along Owens
Pond and wondered if there will be clarifications
about decks and additions. She questioned a home
that has forty feet setback. Mr. Putnam stated
that the forty foot setback is on marsh area by the
Beale' s.
Ms. Connolly stated that they will respond in
writing to Planner Malloy's planning report. She
stated that when she read Planner Malloy's report
she wondered if he was employed by Centex Homes.
Ms. Connolly stated that they disagree with the
density calculations and that they disagree with
the project deviations from Ordinance by PUD.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that he is concerned
with traffic relating to the park and questioned if
Park Lane could be made a one way street. He
further asked Public Works Director Danielson to
briefly review the reasons why signal lights are
not going to be installed at Dodd Road and Mendota
Heights Road.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the square
footage of the homes could be changed. Mr. Putnam
stated that the buildings are very complex in
design and that they just cannot be changed. He
explained that a variety of unit types are proposed
to meet the market demands.
Commissioner Tilsen questioned the storage inside
the units. Mr. Putnam stated that storage is
measured in volume. Mr. Putnam stated that within
the garages there is plenty of storage available.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that there are a lot of
legal issues to review and suggested that the
Commission pass along this information to the City
Attorney and the City Council.
Commissioner Duggan questioned the amount of park
acreage being contributed. Commissioner Duggan
then questioned the financial solidity of Centex
Corporation. Mr. Tom Boyce responded that Centex
is publically held and that they are the second
largest builder in the Country. Mr. Boyce stated
that they will provide any figures requested. Mr.
Boyce provided Commissioner Duggan with an annual
report.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he is against
private roads. He further commented that the City
does not have enough park land and that this is
"our" last chance.
Chairperson Morson moves in view of the request
made by the City Council at their May meeting and
the meetings held subsequent to that that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council
approve the rezoning, wetlands, preliminary plat
and conditional use permit for planned unit
development and that the consider Park Lane to be
designated as a one way street.
Commissioner Dwyer offered a friendly amendment
that the Planning Commission is aware of the legal
issues that have been raised by all parties and
that the Planning Commission is not taking a
position on it and that this recommendation is made
conditioned upon review by the proper legal
authority.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 3 Dreelan, Duggan, Krebsbach
Motion fails.
Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the
City Council deny the rezoning, wetlands,
preliminary plat and conditional use permit for
planned unit development as requested.
Motion fails due to the lack of second.
Commissioner Tilsen moved that the latest revised
plans are an improved plan and that the public
record gathered during the review of the Council's
list of identified issues should be forwarded to
the Council for their review. Commissioner Tilsen
further added that the City Council consider making
Park Lane a one way street designation.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 2, Morson, Duggan
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Chairperson Morson questioned why his motion failed
and Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is still
concerned with density. Commissioner Duggan stated
that this request is in conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan and Commissioner Dreelan
concurred. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that her
concern is with the configurations of the units and
that she had suggested that the housing should be
spread out more. Chairperson Morson stated that he
does not feel that the Planning Commission is doing
its job.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to adjourn the meeting at
12:31 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
MoidilWaiw
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary