Loading...
1995-06-27 Planning Comm Minutes�ILANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 27, 1995 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:34 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Dwyer, Koll, Betlej, Lorberbaum, Tilsen. Commissioners Friel and Duggan were excused. Also present were Engineer Marc Mogan, Planning Consultant John Uban, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. Commissioner Koll moved approval of the May 23, 1995 minutes with corrections. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 95-09: PALMER- I WETLANDS PERMI Mrs. LuDelia Palmer, of 675 Ivy Falls Court, was present to discuss her request for a Wetlands Permit which would allow the installation of a fence, within 100 feet of Ivy Falls Creek, in her rear yard. The proposed fence will be split rail with wire mesh backing and 48 inches in height. Ms. Palmer stated that her intentions are to keep her pets inside her property without obstructing her view of the creek. She explained that the fence will be installed entirely on the mowed area in her rear yard and that landscaping will be installed. Chair Dwyer stated that all signatures of consent have been received. Mrs. Palmer informed the Commission that her neighbor had recently moved and that she has been in contact with the new owners. Mrs. Palmer stated that her new neighbors have verbally agreed with her proposed fence 11 installation. Chair Dwyer moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. OEM I ki ft�� I Mrs. Palmer informed the Commission that a professional survey will be completed prior to the installation of the fence. Commissioner Lorberbaum inquired about the 10 site plan requirements for a Wetlands Permit process. Planner Uban explained that a number of the conditions do not apply because the Wetlands Permit request is for the installation of a fence. Commissioner Lorberbaum stated, according to the Wetlands Permit process, that a time period for completion of the development including timing for staging of development is required. Mrs. Palmer stated that she hopes to begin the fence installation in mid July. Planner Uban informed Mrs. Palmer that a fence permit is required. Commissioner Koll stated that a survey is needed. She stated that Mrs. Palmer's new neighbors need to submit their consensus in writing. Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Wetlands Permit which would allow the construction of a 48 inch high, split rail with wire mesh backing fence within 50 feet of Ivy Falls Creek conditioned upon Mrs. Palmer receiving a professional survey. Chair Dwyer seconded the motion. Commissioner Lorberbaum offered a friendly amendment stating that construction of the fence by completed by September 1, 1995. Commissioner Koll and Chair Dwyer accepted the Friendly Amendment. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 95-02: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - ATHLETIC STADIUM ORDINANCE Chair Dwyer explained that at the City Council's request, the Planning K Commission considered some changes to the Athletic Stadium Ordinance that were submitted by the City Attorney and St. Thomas Academy. Chair Dwyer explained that in April, a sub -committee of Commissioner Friel and himself were directed to meet with City Attorney Tom Hart to discuss suggested changes to the proposed Ordinance. Dwyer explained that in May, the Committee met and a revised ordinance was drafted. Administrative Assistant Batchelder explained that Commissioner Friel was concerned about adding this use within the "I" District. Batchelder explained that Commissioner Friel feels that allowing Athletic Stadiums in the R-1 and B-3 Districts are sufficient. Batchelder explained that three amendments have been proposed in the draft Ordinance: 1. Section 7.2(11) has been added to those uses listed as Conditional Uses in Section 7.2 of the R-1 - One Family Residential District. 2. Section 19.2(14) has been added to those uses listed as Conditional Uses in Section 19.2 of the I - Industrial District. 3. Section 21.6 has been created defining standards for Athletic Stadiums. Commissioner Tilsen inquired where a trade school might be located. Administrative Assistant Batchelder responded it is a permitted use within the "I" - District. Tilsen stated that trade schools are not allowed in the R-1 and B-3 Districts. He stated that by eliminating the Athletic Stadium as a Conditional Use within the "I" District, then trade schools (which are an allowed use in the "I" - District) are not allowed to have an Athletic Stadium. Chair Dwyer stated that Commissioner Friel's concerns regarding "I" District Athletic Stadiums was not discussed during the sub -committee meeting in May. Chair Dwyer inquired if St. Thomas Academy, Visitation and ISD No. 197 were informed of tonight's discussion on Athletic Stadiums. Batchelder responded yes. Commissioner Lorberbaum pointed out that under the proposed Athletic Stadium Ordinance, stadiums are not allowed if it is not associated with a school. 3 Commissioner Betlej stated that the Ordinance should have guidelines regarding the quality of materials an athletic stadium should be constructed of. Commissioner Koll concurred with Commissioner Lorberbaurn and stated that private enterprises should not be excluded from the ordinance. Commissioner Betlej concurred. Chair Dwyer pointed out that the MIST proposal, years back, proposed a soccer stadium, and that under the proposed Athletic Stadium Ordinance, it would not be allowed. Chair Dwyer moved that discussion regarding the Athletic Stadium Ordinance be tabled until the sub -committee of Commissioner Friel, City Attorney Tom Hart and himself can meet to discuss issues regarding the Industrial District and Quality/Exterior materials concerns. CONTINUED HEARING: 95-05: T R A! Z A L n (HERITAGE INN) - CUP FOR RESTAURANT Chair Dwyer explained that the May 23, 1995 meeting, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing on the Tharaldson Enterprises application for a Conditional Use Permit for Restaurant in the "I" Zoning District. He explained that the hearing was continued to allow representatives from the Heritage Inn an opportunity to prepare additional materials regarding restaurant operations, liquor service, parking and public use. He explained that the Planning Commission also directed staff to review the terms and conditions of the original Conditional Use Permit approval. Chair Dwyer explained that during staff's review, it was discovered that after the original site plan was approved by the Planning Commission in 1993, Tharaldson Development returned a few months later with a revised building plan that was approved by the City Council. He explained that the revisions included a spa, a kitchen, eight additional hotel rooms and a second elevator. Chair Dwyer stated that according to Mr. David Toay, Manager of Bon Appetit, the hours of operation will be: Breakfast - 6:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. - Monday -Sunday Lunch - 11:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. - Monday -Sunday H Dinner - 5:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. - Monday -Saturday Dinner - 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. - Sunday only Chair Dwyer stated that Mr. Toay has indicated that no signs will be necessary as the opening of the restaurant to the public will be marketed through personalized company invitations and announcements. Chair Dwyer stated that the Heritage Inn will be requesting and applying for an On Sale Strong Beer and Wine License for the Heritage Cafe. Dwyer explained that Mr. Gartland has indicated that wine and beer will be sold in the Cafe only and will be available for lunch, dinner and a 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. social hour Monday- Friday. Chair Dwyer inquired if the kitchen meets health requirements. Mr. Gartland explained that Mr. Gill, Mendota Heights City Inspector, had been out to inspect the structure and that some minor changes need to be completed. Chair Dwyer explained that Mr. Gartland conducted a parking study between June 2 and June 8 and that the count was done during the hours of 4:00 a.m. and Midnight. Dwyer stated that the study indicated an average of 35 parked cars per day. Overall, 29 percent of occupied rooms have a vehicle in the lot. Mr. Gartland informed the Commission that 2 vans transport NWA employees. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Gartland stated that there is seating for 44 in the main dining room and 24 in the second dining room (which is used for mostly catering functions). Gartland explained that according to City Inspector Gill, a maximum of 50 people in the main dining room is allowed and 28 people in the second dining room. Mr. Gartland stated that there are presently 73 parking spaces available and that the proposed restaurant would require 26 spaces. In response to a question from Commission (Coll, Mr. Gartland stated that peak periods for parking purposes are early morning hours and late night hours. Mr. Gartland stated there are 45 employees at the Heritage Inn. He explained that the daily average of employees is 15. Mr. Gartland informed the Commission that it was a corporate decision by the Marriott to close their restaurant. He informed the Commission that the Courtyard's local management would have liked to keep the restaurant open. A Commissioner Koll stated that she believes the restaurant will be a success and that she is concerned that there will not be enough parking available to thepublic. Mr. Gartland responded that he has discussed, with Courtyard Management, that the Marriott's parking lot could be used for overflow parking. Commissioner Tilsen stated that if the Heritage Inn is successful, another company may want open a restaurant next door. Commissioner Tilsen stated that the Planning Commission cannot count on the Heritage Inn's neighbor (Courtyard by Marriott) parking lot available for overflow parking. Mr. Gartland responded that the restaurant is for a "captive audience", not so much to get into the restaurant business. The Planning Commission discussed that 143 parking spaces are needed for both a public hotel and public restaurant and that there are 73 existing spaces. They discussed the proof -of -parking to be at 44. It was noted that the Heritage Inn is 26 spaces short. Commissioner Betlej stated that 26 is based on the formula for seating capacity in the restaurant. Betlej calculated 73 existing spaces, with 26 spaces needed for the restaurant, leaving 47 spaces available for hotel parking. Commissioner Tilsen stated that it is difficult for the City to limit the Conditional Use Permit for 10 years, or when the lease becomes void. Commissioner Betlej reminded the Planning Commission of City Resolution No. 93-73A which stipulates a specific condition for the removal of the restaurant should the hotel go public. In response to a question from Commission Betlej, Mr. Gartland explained that the service drive for rubbish and deliveries is located on the east side of the building and that the parking lot is not used. A brief discussion was held regarding the proposed liquor policy. Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that the Planning Commission was under the impression that lunch was only going to be served and now dinner has been added. Lorberbaum noted the calculation for seating capacity is confusing and she asked for clarification. Commissioner Betlej informed the Commission that he conducted a parking study on a Sunday at 8:51 A.M. He stated there were 44 cars in the lot. He noted his concern in how the Inn will be able to accommodate parking. He inquired if Mr. Gartland intends to hire additional employees. Mr. Gartland responded maybe two. Mr. Toay, of Bon Appetit, stated that the lunch period is only two hours long. He stated that they want an opportunity to do more business and that 66 people will not come to the restaurant at one time. He stated that the restaurant will have clientele from word of mouth. Mr. Toay stated that A clientele come and go and that parking should not be a problem. Chair Dwyer stated that he is troubled with two issues: liquor license and parking availability to the public. Mr. Ken Scheel, Tharaldson Enterprises, suggested that an interim condition be considered. He suggested that the parking situation should be watched and that if it becomes problematic, then the proof -of -parking should be implemented. He stated that if they thought parking was needed, they would build it. Commissioner Tilsen inquired how does the City ensure that off street parking will not occur. Mr. Scheel stated that this restaurant will not be making a significant amount of money. He stated that a condition could be placed which would allow the restaurant to build clientele for six months. He stated that at the end of six months, if there is a problem, then the proof -of -parking would be installed. Chair Dwyer inquired about foot traffic from the Marriott. He noted his concern during winter time. Mr. Scheel stated that the original plans with Marriott was to construct a walkway between the two hotels. He explained that at that time, the ADA required the construction of a ramp. He stated the ADA requirements are not as strict and that steps and railings can be installed. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this request. Commissioner Tilsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Betlej moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a Restaurant in the Industrial District conditioned upon the following: 1 That the City may request the implementation of the proof -of -parking at any time. 2. That all requirements of the Code Enforcement Department be completed and approved prior to going to the City Council. VA Chair Dwyer seconded the motion and included a third condition: 3. That a walkway be installed between the Marriott and Heritage. Commissioner Lorberbaum offered another condition requiring an easement from Marriott to allow overflow parking. The Commission discussed this condition and Commissioner Koll amended the condition as follows: 4. That a written agreement for overflow parking between the Marriott and Heritage Inn be submitted. CONTINUED HEARING: CASE NO. 95-06: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. Greg Kincaid and Mr. Woody Woodruff, representing MnDOT, were present to discuss their request for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure in the Industrial Zone which would allow the construction of a Salt Storage building at 2229 Pilot Knob Road. Chair Dwyer stated that Planner Uban has raised numerous concerns and in particular, the property lines have not been properly defined. Mr. Woodruff stated that the property lines have been defined on the plans and that they are not constructing the building outside of their property lines. Commissioner Koll inquired about water run-off. Mr. Woodruff explained that the water drains from the parking lot to the catch basins to the pond. He explained that the salt hydrates out of the water before it spills over the outlet. Commissioner Tilsen stated that the topography from the County is different than what MnDOT has submitted. He stated that the existing pond is shown to be larger than the proposed pond on the site plan. Mr. Kincaid stated that the size of the pond has decreased and that the depth of the pond has increased by three feet. Commissioner Tilsen noted his concern that the NURP pond standards are not being followed properly. Mr. Woodruff stated that the pond is shelved twelve feet wide around the edge for maintenance equipment accessibility. Mr. Kincaid stated that the M maximum depth is at 5 1/2 feet and that the overflow has been designed for a 100 year storm at eight feet. Engineer Mogan stated the deeper the pond, the better for water quality. Commissioner Tilsen stated that the property line depiction is not accurate and that he is concerned about private property to the north and the trail to the west. Mr. Woodruff stated that there is a silt fence on the west and north and that they have been in contact with Acacia Cemetery. In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Planner Uban stated that the landscape plan, dimension plan and site plan show different parking configurations. He further stated that no property lines or setbacks are depicted. He stated that he is concerned that the pavement is moving closer to Acacia Cemetery. Mr. Woodruff responded that the bituminous pavement is only being expanded to the south, not towards the north and west. In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej regarding slope maintenance, Planner Uban stated that the steep slopes are proposed and that some are being regraded. He stated he is unclear if a typical seed mix will be used to control the erosion. He stated that this information has not been specified on the plans. Commissioner Betlej stated he does not want to see this area overgrown with vegetation. Planner Uban explained that natural prairie grass has been used in corporate settings and can be done with proper maintenance. He stated that this would difficult to maintain if the slopes stay steep. Commissioner Betlej stated that the south boundary lines should have border plantings. He stated that the height of the trees should be upgrade to City standards. He stated that additional landscaping should be considered. He informed MnDOT of the City's high quality industrial park and that aesthetics are an important quality of the industrial park. Regarding the slope issue, Mr. Kincaid stated that the slope closest to Acacia Cemetery has been cut from 1:1 slope to a 4:1 slope. He stated that lawn equipment can access this area. He stated that seeding will be done this fall. Mr. Kincaid stated that a two foot berm with plantings is proposed. Chair Dwyer stated that MnDOT is moving a lot of dirt and that an Conditional Use Permit is needed. Mr. Woodruff stated that MnDOT received permission from City staff to move dirt during the Mendota Bridge reconstruction. 9 Commissioner Betlej moved to table MnDOT's request for a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure until July 25, 1995 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. which would allow MnDOT time to prepare additional information as per City Planner's Report dated June 27, 1995: 1 Revise Dimension, Landscape and Grading Plans to show property lines, building location, paving pattern, holding pond, erosion control and pond access. 2. MnDOT should provide detailed turf establishment specifications and details for steel slope areas. 3. Additional screening is needed along Acacia Cemetery and along the west side next to Sibley Memorial Highway and Regional Trail. All plant material to be sized to meet City Ordinance requirements. Chair Dwyer called a recess at 9:21 o'clock P.M. Chair Dwyer reconvened the meeting at 9:30 o'clock P.M. HEARING: CASE NO. 95-11: MCNAMARA - CUP AND VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. Thomas McNamara, of 2371 Swan Drive, were present to discuss their request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance which would allow them to construct a 384 square foot accessory storage structure approximately 15 feet from Lake Drive. Mr. McNamara explained that there is an existing 7' by 9' shed with a 6' by 6' adjoining shed that they would like to replace with a 16' by 24' shed for storage of yard and recreational equipment in his back yard. Commissioner Tilsen stated that additional information is needed regarding structure details on the doors, architectural designs, compatibility with the house, color and a door apron. Mr. McNamara stated that a standard garage door is proposed. Mrs. McNamara stated that they intend to match the shed with the color of their house (a neutral color). She stated that the Planner suggested matching the shed with the surrounding trees and that they do not have a problem with this suggestion. She stated that they would like to have the option to paint the shed a color that is agreeable with their neighbors. She stated they would like to match their house. EM In response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mrs. McNamara stated that the shed is the style of a garage. She stated that there is a limitation on how high the roof can be. Regarding the setback location, Mr. McNamara stated that a pre existing condition exists and that constructing a new shed will not harm the tree root line and that he would like to keep the shed setback at 15 feet. Commissioner Tilsen stated that Planner Uban suggests an 18 foot setback. Mr. McNamara stated that a slab already exists and that he would like to use it. Regarding the proposed shed door, Mrs. McNamara stated that door will face the house, not the street. She stated she would prefer an apron instead of grass in front of the shed. She stated it will be much easier to move tractor equipment and bicycles in and out of the shed. She stated that they will preserve the existing vegetation and add some on the north side of the yard. In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Planner Uban stated that he would prefer to see the shed not look like a garage. He stated that a future owner may be tempted to use the shed as a garage. He stated there are several ideas the McNamara's can pursue to make the shed match their house. Commissioner Betlej concurred with Planner Uban. He stated that the shed does not look like a part of their home. He stated that the McNamara's should research different architectural ideas. He stated that in the long run, the McNamara's will be happier with the consistency between the house and shed and that more value will be added to the property. In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej, Planner Uban stated that he is concerned that the footprint of the building will compact and may destroy the tree roots and that is why he suggested an 18' setback instead of a 15' foot setback. Commissioner Koll stated that the existing shed is well hidden and the new shed will be well hidden also. She stated that a garage door makes the shed look like a garage. She inquired if they will be using a garage door opener. Mrs. McNamara stated they are considering this option. She stated a garage door opener would be an easier way for her children to access the shed for their bicycles. Commissioner Betlej suggested that the McNamara's consider increasing the 11 pitch of the roof and a large overhang to match the house. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this request. Chair Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Structure and a Front Yard Setback Variance of twelve feet (12') to allow construction of a 384 square foot storage shed, as proposed, and to be located eighteen feet (18') from the property line with the following condition: 1 That the architectural design of the shed be revised to match the existing structure and that revised sketch elevations be submitted to the City Council for approval. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. HEARING: CASE NO. 95-12: MENDOTA MALL ASSOCIATES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. Edward Paster, owner of Mendota Mail, and Mr. Patrick Soeun, owner of Mendota Liquor, located at 750 Highway 110, were present to discuss their request for a Conditional Use Permit which would allow the operation of a liquor store in the B-4 District. Mr. Paster explained that he and Mr. Soeun, appeared before the City' Council on June 6, 1995 to request a liquor licenses for the new liquor store in the Mendota Plaza that will be approximately 1/2 the size of the old MGM Liquor store. He explained that before the second reading of the liquor license approval City staff found that a Conditional Use Permit was needed. Mr. Paster stated that MGM Liquor has been closed approximately 1 1/2 12 years and the ordinance requires that there be a new Conditional Use Permit after a period of non-use for longer than six months. A brief discussion was held regarding hours of operations and where signs will be located. It was noted that Mr. Soeun is aware of the City's Liquor Ordinance requirements for hours of operation. Mr. Paster stated that there will be signs above the liquor store door and on the Mendota Plaza pylon. In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej, Mr. Paster stated that there will be landscaping improvements done to the center including an irrigation system with the parking lot project. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. There was no one present to discuss this request. Chair Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion. Waim Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for a liquor store in the B-4 District. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. HEARING: CASE NO. 95-10: ME7dX4T,k HEIGHTS Pi,"�R 3 - VARIANCES Mr. Michael Cashill and Mr. Allen Spaulding, owners of Mendota Heights Par 3 Golf Course, located at 1695 Dodd Road, were present to discuss their request for a sign size variance and setback variance. Chair Dwyer stated that the Zoning Ordinance allows one name plate sign for a Use other than residential such that the sign does not exceed 12 square feet in area per surface. He further stated that the preexisting sign had 35 square feet per surface and the proposed new sign has 48 square feet per surface. Chair Dwyer inquired about practical difficulty and M Mr. Cashill stated that the R-1 District rules are for single family homes. He stated that sign regulations were established in the R-1 District to regulate signs such as real estate signs. He stated that the Mendota Heights Par 3 is a business which operates in the R-1 District and that a larger sign is needed because it is a business. He stated that sign has been there for 33 years. He stated that the new sign was installed using the old posts. He explained that the size was expanded six inches on all sides and lowered 12 inches. Mr. Cashill explained that they researched setting the sign back further onto their property. He stated that if the sign were placed back further, the sight lines would be screened because of the parking lot. He stated that if the sign were moved further to the north, then it would be in the tee box or practice green area. Mr. Spaulding stated there were two existing signs and that one was removed. He stated the new sign is nearly identical to the old sign. He stated the new sign is a subtle sign for business advertisement. He explained that the old sign was in poor condition and that they considered re -painting it, however, it was rotted. He stated that they would consider any other proposal, but that the old posts already existed. Mr. Spaulding stated that the sign is 7 feet high and that they intend to landscape around the sign. Commissioner Koll stated that the sign is dark and subtle. She suggested that bright flowers may be more appropriate than greenery around the sign. Commissioner Betlej inquired if MnDOT has any plans to widen Dodd Road. He stated that if the road is widened, then the placement of the sign may become a safety issue. He inquired who has the right to condemn the sign. Planner Uban responded MnDOT would condemn the sign and that it would have to be replaced, under that scenario. Chair Dwyer stated that the owners of Par 3 have set a bad precedent in that commercial property owners can put up signs and appeal for variances if they are caught. Mr. Cashill stated that the sign has existed for 33 years and that the square footage is only slightly larger. He stated that a 4' by 6' sign was taken down and that the 5' by 7' sign was replaced with a 6' by 8' sign. He stated that both signs were in terrible shape. He stated that they considered repainting the signs but felt that replacement would be better. 14 V Commissioner Tilsen stated that their request was a reasonable request. He inquired if the red neon sign in the window is turned off at night. Mr. Spaulding responded that a complaint had been received and that the manager is now responsible in turning off the neon light. Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that the improvements have been excellent and that there is a clear view of traffic. She inquired if the two green poles from the old sign, which was removed, will be taken down. Mr. Spaulding stated that the poles will be removed. Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Jim Gryc, Evergreen Knolls, stated that he owns the house on Dodd Road and that the driveway access is to Dodd Road. He stated that the old sign screened the view from the driveway and that he is glad the old sign has been removed and that now the poles will be removed. He stated that the new sign is great and that it is subtle. He stated that the new owners of the golf course have done a nice job with the improvements to the course. Chair Dwyer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion. Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend that the City Council grant a sign size variance and a sign setback variance to Mendota Heights Par 3 Golf Course with a proven hardship being that visible signage is needed in order for the business to operate and that the combined total square feet of signs has been reduced with the condition that the 2 poles next to the driveway on Dodd Road be removed. Chair Dwyer seconded the motion. Commissioner Betlej offered another condition that a 25 square foot of landscaping be installed around the sign. Commissioner Lorberbaum and Chair Dwyer accepted the friendly amendment. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 15 Administrative Assistant Batchelder updated the Planning Commission on City Council actions regarding recent planning cases. rjTjjoffejFljl�� There being no further business, the Planning Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 10:30 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary 16