Loading...
1991-02-05 Council minutesPage No. 3007 February 5, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, February 5, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Koch and Smith. Councilmembers Blesener and Cummins were excused. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Koch moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Koch moved approval of the minutes of the January 18th regular meeting with correction. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Smith moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for January. b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for January. C. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the November 27th Planning Commission meeting. d. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the January 3rd Planning Commission meeting. e. Adoption of Resolution No. 91 -04, "RESOLUTION OPPOSING FURTHER CUTS IN STATE AID TO CITIES." f. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated and attached hereto. Page No. 3008 February 5, 1991 g. Approval of the list of claims dated and totalling $261,005.90. h. Acknowledgment of bids received for the sale of surplus Police Department firearms and award of sale to Outpost Hunting and Sporting for their high bid of $1,060.00 i. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-05, "A RESOLUTION OF FRIENDSHIP AND GOODWILL TO THE CITY OF PERESLAVL, SOVIET UNION." Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 AIR NOISE Air Noise Consultant Bob Collette was present to review proposed air corridor modifications. He gave Council and the audience a history of the City's involvement in the air noise issue, and explained the proposed corridor modifications which would establish a defined north boundary for departures of 105 degrees off runway 11L. Mr. Collette informed Council that the proposal has been made by the MAC Blue Ribbon Committee and while it has been embraced by the local FAA, it must go through regional and national review. Mr. Collette reviewed overheads of the two departure tracks for Council. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that the proposal gives the City a northern corridor boundary which can be argued and protected. He explained that last year there were 350,000 operations from the airport and 55 to 60% of those operations were over Mendota Heights and Eagan. The proposed corridor is very important to Mendota Heights because it would mean that planes will be confined to the corridor instead of flying all over the City, and that planes must fly four- tenths of a mile beyond the end of the runway before changing headings. If the proposal is approved, planes will no longer depart over the Roger's Lake, Curley's and Friendly Hills neighborhoods. Departures will still affect homes in Bridgeview and the southern parts of Copperfield. He stated that the proposal is a major breakthrough for the City and is the culmination of more than two years of efforts. Responding to a question from Councilmember Smith, Mr. Collette stated that he does not Page No. 3009 February 5, 1991 know how quickly the proposal can be effected but that he is hoping for a spring or summer implementation. CASE NO. 90-44, STRUB Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that Mayor Mertensotto asked whether additional future variances will be needed to accommodate the expansion. Mr. Glowa responded that the preliminary plat Council originally reviewed for phase 2 was for a 3.77 acre site but that the site has been expanded to 5.35 acres to accommodate the potential building expansion. Mr. Glowa asked that Council authorize the use of $60,000 in Tax Increment Financing to assist in the costs of creating a retention pond on the Solvay site. Mayor Mertensotto asked Public Works Director Danielson whether the proposed pond is necessary as part of the Solvay Phase 2 development. consideration of an application from William Strub for the subdivision of property on T.H. 13 had been scheduled on the agenda but that the Planning Commission had continued its hearing to February. Councilmember Koch moved that consideration of the application for subdivision be tabled to the March 5th Council meeting. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the 91-02, SOLVAY purpose of a public hearing on an application from Solvay Animal Health for an amendment to its conditional use permit for Planned Unit Development to allow construction of Phase II of its development. Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties, explained that Solvay has asked United to construct a second building for Solvay's office campus. He reviewed drawings for Council and the audience and stated that Solvay has asked United to enlarge its site to allow for a future 12,000 square foot expansion of the building - the total building size he is proposing could eventually be 42,000 square foot. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether additional future variances will be needed to accommodate the expansion. Mr. Glowa responded that the preliminary plat Council originally reviewed for phase 2 was for a 3.77 acre site but that the site has been expanded to 5.35 acres to accommodate the potential building expansion. Mr. Glowa asked that Council authorize the use of $60,000 in Tax Increment Financing to assist in the costs of creating a retention pond on the Solvay site. Mayor Mertensotto asked Public Works Director Danielson whether the proposed pond is necessary as part of the Solvay Phase 2 development. Page No. 3010 February 5, 1991 Mr. Danielson responded that the storm sewer system for the industrial park was constructed many years ago under then-prevailing design criteria. Since that time, there have been several large water events which caused flooding in the business park, and staff has asked Barr Engineering, as part of their overall storm water plan, to recommend steps which should be taken to resolve the problems. He stated that since the plan will not be done for six months, staff has asked the developers of this project to do what they can to hold back water on their site. He informed council that because this is the largest available site in the business park the developers have been asked to develop a retention pond. He stated that creation of a pond in the middle of the site would solve the drainage problems, and that 1.5 acres would be needed for water storage on the site. He informed Council that the developers feel that a good way to handle the water would be to create an aesthetically designed storm water pond which would enhance the development. The City would not own the pond but would purchase an easement (through T.I.F.), and Solvay would do the maintenance on the pond. Mr. Glowa stated that the overall cost of the project is much higher than is stated in Mr. Danielson's memo to Council, but that Solvay feels it makes a good deal of sense to turn the pond into an aesthetic feature, with extensive landscaping and adding a fountain, and that they are willing to bear the cost to enhance and maintain the pond. Treasurer Shaughnessy informed Council that the City's bond counsel has determined that this would be an appropriate expenditure of tax increment funding and that there is sufficient funding available. Mr. Glowa responded to Council questions regarding the proposed variances for the number, parking ratio of 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building versus 5 spaces/1,000, and parking space width of 8.5 feet versus 9 feet. He stated that the requested parking variances are consistent with what has been done in the business park. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the requested amendment to the conditional use Page No. 3011 February 5, 1991 permit for P.U.D. includes variances for parking ratio (4 spaces per 1,000 square feet), parking stall size (8.5 feet), a 20 foot variance for sign setback, and an 8 foot sideyard setback variance for a covered walkway. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Smith moved that the hearing be closed. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Councilmember Smith moved adoption of Resolution No. 91-06, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH PHASE II," as amended to delineate the requested four variances, along with approval for a Tax Increment Financing expenditure in the sum of $60,000 to assist in the storm water holding pond proposed for the site and authorization for issuance of the necessary building permit. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 HEARING: CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the 91-01, ST. PAUL purpose of a public hearing on an application TURNER'S CLUB from the St. Paul Turner's Club for rezoning and minor Comprehensive Plan amendment. He informed the audience that the Planning Commission has continued its hearing to February 26th and has recommended Council continuation to March 5th. Councilmember Koch moved that the hearing on Case No. 91-01 be continued to 8:15 P.M. on March 5th. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE NO. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the 90-39, PUTNAM purpose of a public hearing on an application from R.A. Putnam Associates for a comprehensive plan amendment for a neighborhood commercial center. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that Mr. Page No. 3012 February 5, 1991 Putnam is unable to attend the meeting and has requested that it be continued. Councilmember Koch moved that the hearing on Case No. 90 -39 be continued to 8:00 P.M. on February 19th. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 91- 03,MOSSMAN Ms. Bonnie Mossman was present to request approval of the use of a temporary business sign at 2150 Dodd Road (T. Belvidere's) which requires a twelve foot front yard setback variance and seven square foot sign size variance. Ms. Mossman stated that she would like permission to install the portable 32 square foot sign on her property for 90 days. Councilmember Smith moved to approve a temporary 25 foot front yard setback variance and 7 foot sign area variance to allow a temporary portable four by eight foot business sign to be located at T.Belvidere's for 90 days. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 91 -04, Ms. Sylvia Pentel and her legal representa- PENTEL tive, John Bellows, were present to request approval of a thirty -seven foot height variance to allow construction of a 68 foot high crank -up tower to support a rotatable beam ham radio antenna on her property at 556 Fremont Avenue. Mr. Bellows stated that Ms. Pentel is seeking the variance to construct and maintain a well - engineered tower and antenna system to provide reasonably adequate communications at a minimum height. Ms. Pentel is federally licensed. She has submitted specifications on a retractable tower which is engineered to a safety factor of two, and is rated to withstand 80 mile per hour winds. It would have no guywires and would be a self - supporting tower which is retractable to 29 feet if necessary. Mayor Mertensotto asked the lot size and the proposed location of the tower. Page No. 3013 February 5, 1991 Mr. Bellows responded that the lot is 60 feet wide by 120 feet deep and that the tower would be located within ten feet of the back of the home, adjacent to an existing deck. He further stated that there are 60 foot tall cottonwood trees behind the Pentel lot. Mayor Mertensotto asked if there are two existing antennas on the home. Mr. Bellows responded that there are, and that they are vertical, single rod antennas that extend up about 45 feet. The proposed tower antenna would greatly increase the reliability of transmission and reduce the likelihood of interference with the neighbors. He further stated that Ms. Pentel feels the 68 foot tower is the minimum height needed for reliable communications and that she feels that because of the nature of the communications it is important to have a certain minimum height. He stated that Ms. Pentel is operating on a frequency which requires 62 to 68 feet of height for reliability. He recognized that there is neighborhood opposition, but that Ms. Pentel is proposing an installation that is a minimum necessary in terms of height and placement. It will be visible but not as much as people think. He stated that it is not the only structure in the neighborhood that is visible that people find unattractive, and showed Council pictures of existing power poles, a transmission tower about a block away, etc., that people might not consider "works of art" in the neighborhood. He further stated that the Council approved an application for an antenna tower on Delaware in 1987. Mayor Mertensotto responded that he has looked at the antenna on Delaware. There was no neighborhood objection to that antenna, and the applicant assured Council that there would be limited use and it would be nested often. He further felt that a tower of this type could topple down on someone else's property or home and therefore presents a potential safety hazard. Mr. Bellows stated that such towers are engineered with those specific considerations in mind and that if the tower was extended to 68 feet in storm conditions, it is possible to nest it at 28 feet, which is not true for Page No. 3014 February 5, 1991 other structures, such as trees, which could more easily fall. He felt that trees present much more of a hazard than the tower would. He suggested that failure to grant the variance would prevent Ms. Pentel from doing a ham radio activity. He stated that Council must deal with a 1985 issue from the FCC which states that local regulations involving the placement, screening or height of antennas based on health, safety or aesthetics must represent minimum practical regulations. He informed Council that he has given the City Attorney six citations which have dealt with the issue: in each of the six, the actions by councils to unduly restrict the height of towers have been overturned, and in two, the court has awarded attorney fees. He stated that Ms. Pentel is proposing a well - engineered tower, and minimally necessary height to provide reasonable operation, and that the objections based on interference, etc., are either based on misunderstanding or aesthetics. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the Tower on Delaware was the first to be approved and was only approved because there was no neighborhood objection. He stated that the City has a responsibility as far as safety of the towers, and asked why the application should have the right to put up something that could fall over onto someone else's property. He further pointed out that the City does not allow buildings of the height proposed by the applicant for the tower. He the offered an opportunity for Ms. Pentel's neighbors to speak on the matter. Ms. Elizabeth Plummer, 605 Garden Lane, spoke to the comparisons between the Pentel request and the tower on Delaware. She stated that on Delaware, the tower runs right along the fireplace and goes just to the top of the chimney and is barely noticeable. The proposed Pentel tower is not unlike the metal structure for a windmill and is very unsightly. She further stated that Ms. Pentel has stated that when the tower is up it would be used to record the wind velocity, yet she also says that during wind storms she would lower the tower - which is contradictory. She pointed out that Ms. Pentel has two towers now - one is a wind monitor, which she has seen at a 90 degree angle when it is windy. She Page No. 3015 February 5, 1991 wondered what such winds would do to a 68 foot tall structure. She informed Council that she has submitted a petition of opposition signed by 25 neighbors who oppose the request, and that she could get many more signatures if she had more time. She felt that the tower could interfere with television and radio reception, garage door openers, and mobile telephones, and it could tip over in a wind. She pointed out that ham radio operation is a hobby for Ms. Pentel but that the rest of the neighbors would be made to sacrifice for her hobby. She felt that the tower is unsightly and that there is not room in the yard for such a massive structure. Mr. Robert Cunningham, 561 Hiawatha, stated that he lives directly behind Ms. Pentel's property and that he echoes Mrs. Plummer's comments and protests the tower request. Mayor Mertensotto asked Ms. Pentel what the tower would offer over what she already has available with the existing antennas. Ms. Pentel responded that there would be better communication, it would be more liability, and it would provide the ability to communicate anywhere in the U.S. It is a directional antenna and allows her to make contact anywhere she needs to. She stated that communication must be reliable or it is no good and the her present system is not reliable for what she wants to do. It is good for what it is designed to do, but the proposed tower is for a different type of transmission. She stated that she needs long range capability and reliability and that ham radio operation is not just her hobby. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not like to have a situation which pits neighbors against each other and that it is obvious that the neighbors are concerned over the height of the structure. Mr. Don Driver, acting area manager for the National Medical Disaster System, stated that Ms. Pentel is his communications officer, and is a volunteer. The disaster system is prepared to respond to major disasters. There are other forms of communication used on a daily basis, - telephone, computers, etc., but there are those situations where back up Page No. 3016 February 5, 1991 communications are necessary and maybe even primary if there were a tornado and the City was damaged. He stated that one of the most important aspects of any emergency is communication. He suggested that the City's Fire Department may be a part of the disaster system, and informed Council that there are 22 participating medical centers throughout the seven-county metro area. The amateur network can communicate verbally and electronically over the airwaves and can also transmit a television signal electronically, and he can see that communication in his emergency operations center. He stated that if a tornado came through, the neighbors would be very glad they had the tower to get help. Responding to Mrs. Plummer's comments, Mr. Bellows stated that the tower is not windmill size and that the structure on Delaware is 8 feet from the property line whereas the Pentel tower would be 16 feet from the property line. He stated that he presumes there is no more of a safety concern with the Pentel proposal than the Delaware tower. With respect to interference, he stated that he is reluctant to tell someone they cannot do something, but that radio interference is within the exclusive province of the FCC, and the fact is that Ms. Pentel is responsible to be sure she is not the cause of any interference. He is not aware of any complaints of interference at this time and has no reason to think there would be more interference with a taller tower. Mrs. Plummer stated that the proposal sounds very commercial to her and it is not a commercial area. Mayor Mertensotto responded that this is not the issue, that the issue is does the City want to allow the tower from a health, welfare and safety standpoint without unduly interfering with Ms. Pentel's right to be a ham radio operator. He asked Ms. Pentel if reception for the existing antennas would be improved if the trees were topped. Mr. Bellows responded that it would not, that reception is degraded because the trees are there but to have reliable communications a certain elevation is needed - and Ms. Pentel is saying that the minimum necessary to achieve this level is 62 to 68 feet. Page No. 3017 February 5, 1991 Councilmember Smith asked what the range of the Ms. Pentel's current system is. Ms. Pentel responded that she could go around the world with the proposed tower. She can sporadically get various places in the U.S. now, but it is not reliable for a distance. She would have more availability of international and thorough nation -wide transmission with the tower. Mrs. Lorraine Gerten, 542 Fremont, stated that nothing has been mentioned with respect to electrical current or how far the tower would be from the power lines. Mr. Bellows responded that radio energy is located in the top of the antenna and is radio frequency energy, and is not 110 or 220 volt. The tower at full extension would not, even if it fell, hit the power lines. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Mr. Bellows has quoted citations on the FCC ruling, but Council has control over heights and types of structures allowed. Mr. Bellows responded that in the citations, PRB -1 was in conflict with the Zoning Ordinance where it restricts antennas to less than 60 feet and that each case over -rode the action of the City in denying a variance or conditional use permit. Councilmember Smith asked whether all of the cases dealt just with antennas or did they deal with other structures. Mr. Bellows responded that they specifically related to amateur towers and antennas. Mayor Mertensotto asked whether the ordinances in question were trying to regulate amateur radio towers. Mr. Bellows responded that most were general height restrictions for any structure. City Attorney Hart stated that the question is what is minimally necessary in order to reasonably accommodate amateur communications. The City's ordinance does not preclude amateur radio communications. Council must balance the needs of the amateur radio operators Page No. 3018 February 5, 1991 against local needs. Council must determine that if it feels if the tower is unsafe at 62 feet or whatever height, at what level would it be safe. Mr. Bellows agreed that the ordinance does not prohibit amateur radio operation but stated that the conflict is height, and Ms. Pentel believes that 68 feet is necessary and no one has rebutted that. Council directed that the matter be continued to the February 19th meeting and that the City Attorney prepare a report on what discretion is available to Council in the matter. WEED CUTTING Council acknowledged a memo from Weed Inspector Dick Gill regarding the weed ordinance and enforcement policy. Public Works Director Danielson the memo is in response to issues raised by Council - concern over the response time for getting weeds cut and providing for exemption language in the ordinance. It was the consensus that one certified ten day notice to cut weeds is sufficient time for response/action by property owners, and that staff should prepare an ordinance amendment to provide for the granting of exceptions to the ordinance. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the weed cutting regulations should be addressed in the next issue of Heights Hilites. SCHOUVELLER PROPERTY Council acknowledged a memo from Treasurer TIF PURCHASE REQUEST Shaughnessy regarding interest expressed by Mr. Jerry Schouveller for the sale of his property on Roger's Road to the City. Mr. Schouveller was present for the discussion. Mr. Shaughnessy explained that the purchase of the five residential properties on Roger's Road was included in the TIF plan because they are non-conforming uses in a B-1 District and are located within the airport noise zones. Council discussed the matter with Mr. Schouveller and his representative. It was pointed out that the City's appraisal of the vacant lots is considerably less per square foot than is the appraisal which was done for Mr. Schouveller by Metzen Realty, and that the $3.36/square foot in the Metzen appraisal is Page No. 3019 February 5, 1991 higher than $2.94 /square foot cost for the Solvay drainage easement even though the Solvay property is fully improved. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that Mr. Schouveller come back with a new proposal if he wishes. CITY HALL PAYMENT Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Treasurer Shaughnessy regarding a request from the City Hall general contractor for payment of $11,277.61 of the $18,000 withheld on the construction contract. Mr. Shaughnessy stated that the contractor is requesting reimbursement for work that has been done on excavation to correct the drainage problem and water seepage damage. He stated that the question needing to be considered is whether the $5,000 which the City would continue to hold is sufficient to correct remaining problems. He pointed out that it cannot yet be determined whether the drainage correction will work. Building Manager Guy Kullander stated that the City withheld the $18,000 to cover a number of I problems needing correction. He informed Council that staff has asked the contractor to give the City a written description of how he plans to correct the deficiencies, including correcting drainage along the back sidewalk by the Police Department and repairing carpet and wall damage caused by the water seepage on the south side of the building. It was the consensus that funds would not be released until all problems are corrected and until it can be determined that the drainage corrections on the south side of the building will work. MENDAKOTA PARK BIDS Mr. Kullander gave the Council a brief ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE background on the Mendakota Park acquisition and development, including review of currently proposed development plans. Mayor Mertensotto commented that the comfort station roof pitch is so steep that the roof would be the focal point in the park. He suggested that the roof should be lower profile. Mr. Kullander informed Council that the observation deck on the comfort station and Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Page No. 3020 February 5, 1991 the bandshell/picnic pavilion have been added to the original park concept. He then briefly reviewed the anticipated costs and available funding. He asked for Council authorization to advertise for bids to construct the fields, parking lot, trail, fence, etc. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson regarding a request from Station 19 Architects that Council approve a $1,750 increase in its contract for Mendakota Park architecture because of the increased scope of the project. After discussion, Councilmember Smith moved to accept the plans and specifications for the Mendakota Community Park and authorize advertisement for bids, and to increase the architectural agreement with Station 19 Architects by $1,750 in recognition of additional work requested by the City. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a Administrator regarding expired terms of office Park Commissions. memo from the City appointments to on the Planning and Councilmember Smith moved to reappoint Mike Dwyer and Dan Tilsen to three year terms on the Planning Commission and Carol Damberg, Steven Kleinglass and Stephen Hunter to three year terms on the Parks and Recreation Commission. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. It was the consensus that Council meet at 6:30 P.M. on February 19th to interview individuals who have applied for appointment to the Planning Commission vacancy created by the retirement of Jerry Morson. COUNCIL WORKSHOPS Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from the City Administrator regarding the scheduling of Council/Commission teambuilding and goal setting workshops. It was the consensus that the goal setting workshop be held on Saturday, March 2nd from 8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. and that the Page No. 3021 February 5, 1991 teambuilding session be tentatively scheduled for April 6th. PERRON PROPERTY Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator Lawell regarding an offer from the Margaret Perron Estate for the sale of 2370 Highway 55 to the City. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that Council has made a decision not to acquire any more properties in the Furlong Addition, and felt that there is no reason for the City to acquire the property. It was the consensus of Council that the offer be declined. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Smith moved that the meeting be adjourned to 6:30 P.M. on February 19th for Commission candidate interviews. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:55 o'clock P.M. Kdthleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL February 5, 1991 Asphalt License Plaster License Prior Lake Blacktop, Inc. Quality Drywall, Inc. Masonry Licenses A & B Cement Construction, Inc. Moline, B.R.-Masonry, Inc. Northland Concrete & Masonry, Inc. Viking Concrete & Masonry, Inc. Excavating License Nova-Frost, Inc. Gas Piping Licenses Hinding Heating & A/C, Inc. R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc. Red Wing Heating & A/C,.-'Inc. Snell Mechanical, Inc. Twin City Furnace Co., Inc. Welter, Ray N.-Heating Co. General Contractor Licenses Able Fence, Inc. Berggren Construction Bream Builders, Inc. Coronado Stone Dahm, K.W. Const. Co., Inc. Elite Kitchen & Bath, Inc. KMH Erectors, Inc. MN Exteriors, Inc. Nardini Fire Equipment Co. Roto-Rooter Services Co. Sela Roofing & Remodeling, Inc. Shield Fire Protection, Inc. Unipro Construction Co. Valley Investments Const. Co. Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Heatina & Air Conditionina Licenses Harris Waldinger, Inc. R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc. Snell Mechanical, Inc. Twin City Furnace Co. Rubbish License Roadway Rubbish