1990-05-01 Council minutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, May 1, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock
P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmembers: Cummins, Blesener, Anderson and Hartmann.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the
April 17th regular meeting with corrections.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the April
17th Parks and Recreation commission
meeting.
b. Acknowledgment of the Vasatka-Goers VFW
Post Donation with direction to staff to
prepare a plaque for presentation at the
first City Council meeting in June.
c. Acknowledgment of a memo from Police Chief
Dennis Delmont regarding an update on the
hiring of a new police officer.
d. Approval of a modified critical area site
plan for Mr. Richard Askler to construct
an addition to a garage at 1037 Mayfield
Heights Lane along with waiver of the
critical area application fee.
e. Adoption of Resolution No. 90 -25,
"RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
VICTORIA HIGHLANDS 8TH ADDITION ".
f. Approval of the list of contractor licenses
dated May 1, 1990 and attached hereto.
g. Approval of the List of Claims dated May 1,
1990 and totalling $196,087.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from
IMPROVEMENTS Administrative Assistant Batchelder and Public
Works Director Danielson regarding the
recommendation from the Parks and Recreation
Commission that the Neighborhood Park
Improvement project be awarded to GMH Asphalt,
Inc. Public Works Director Danielson
explained that the low bidder, GMH Asphalt,
Inc. is a company that has completed work
within the City before and has done an
acceptable job. He further explained that the
City received their bid which was
approximately $60,000 below the engineering
estimate. He further explained that the
engineering estimate was above what they had
budgeted by about $30,000. He explained that
the reason why it was over budgeted was
because there were some trails added to the
parks that were not originally planned for.
He further explained that they are
recommending transferring money from the trail
contingency fund. Mayor Mertensotto explained
that the contingency fund is the fund that is
in the park bond issue.
After a brief discussion regarding the type of
development that will take place in the parks,
Councilmember Blesener moved to award the
Neighborhood Park Improvement project to GMH
Asphalt, Inc. with their low bid of
$201,748.50 with funding to be covered by Park
Bond Referendum money out of the Neighborhood
Park Budget and to transfer money from the
Trail Contingency'Fund.
Councilmember Cummins.seconded the motion..
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 90 -03: Mayor Mertensotto explained that the developer
CENTEX HOMES has requested that the public hearing be
continued to the May 15, 1990 City Council
meeting. Mayor Mertensotto then asked if
there was anyone present who had questions or
comments regarding Centex Homes' request. Mr.
Gerald Duffy, attorney representing
approximately 500 people who live in the area
where the development is planned. Mr. Duffy
submitted a petition with 521 names of people
who are opposed to the development.
Councilmember Anderson moved to continue the
public hearing to May 15, 1990 at 8:15 o'clock
P.M.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 90 -11: Mr. James Loving, 672 Cheyenne Lane was present
LOVING - VARIANCE to discuss his request for a side yard setback
variance to construct a four season porch.
Councilmember Hartmann pointed out the lot is
a corner lot and that the orientation of the
house is reversed from what the ordinance
requires.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of an
eight foot (81) side yard setback variance to
the thirty foot (301) side yard setback
requirement to construct a four season porch.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 90 -12: Mr. Bob Brasch representing J.A. Development
J.A. DEVELOPMENT was present to discuss their request for a
WETLANDS PERMIT Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a new
home on Lot 6, and 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 1,
Tilsen's Highland Heights Addition.
Councilmember Cummins questioned if there will
be a substantial amount of filling done. Mr.
Brasch responded that there will be a lot of
soil corrections done. He explained that most
of the soil on top is bad soil and that new
soil will be brought in. In response to a
question from. Councilmember. Blesener, Mr.
Brasch stated that they would be able to
retain the trees.
Councilmember Blesener questioned the time
line on the project. Mr. Brasch explained
that the soil correction procedure will be
starting around mid May and that there would
be a two week period before the footings are
poured. Mayor Mertensotto expressed his
concerns for safety with regards to the large
hole. Mr. Brasch explained that that there
would be a gradual slant. Public Works
Director Danielson explained that OSHA
requires that the side slopes be at a 1:1
angle. He further explained that they should
have the side slopes gradual enough so that
some one could walk in and walk out. Mr.
Brasch stated that if Council would like them
to put a snow fence up they would do so.
Councilmember Blesener questioned J.A.
Development is going to install underground
drainage. Mr. Brasch explained that they will
be installing drain tile, and if they run into
water, they will do a de-watering process.
Mr. Brasch explained that if they do run into
underground springs, they would consider
rerouting the drainage.
Councilmember Cummins moved to approve grant
the requested Wetlands Permit for construction
of a home on Lot 6, and 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 1,
Tilsen's Highland Heights Addition.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 89-25: Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
DODGE NATURE CTR purpose of a public hearing on an application
CUP FOR PUD from Dodge Nature Center requesting a
conditional use permit for a planned unit
development to construct an interpretive
center.
Mr. Jim Malkowski, Executive Director of the
Dodge Nature Center was present to discuss
their request. Mr. Malkowski introduced Mr.
Howard Dolts representing Setter, Leach and
Lindstrom Architects. Mr. Malkowski explained
that there is neighborhood opposition to
access through Dodge Lane. He explained that
they have discussed this issue with-MnDOT and
have requested their assistance in finding an
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
alternative plan. He explained that MnDOT has
agreed to allow a right turn off of Highway
110. He further explained that MnDOT has told
Dodge Nature Center that the construction of a
right turn in and out will be the Nature
Center's expense. Mr. Malkowski stated that
they would like to utilize that new option as
presented by MnDOT. Mr. Malkowski pointed out
that Mr. Schokmiller, resident on Dodge Lane,
is present at the meeting tonight. He further
explained that Mr. Schokmiller attended the
meetings between the Dodge Nature Center and
MnDOT. Mr. Malkowski stated that they believe
they have found a viable solution. Mayor
Mertensotto stated that this solution will, in
the long run, serve the Nature Center and the
City well.
Mayor Mertensotto asked that the resolution
submitted be modified to show reference to the
plan and date so that the Council will know
what is being built. Public Works Director
Danielson stated that the Nature Center has
submitted a new plan showing the new driveway
coming off of Highway 110.
Councilmember Blesener confirmed that there
will be no connection between Dodge Lane cul-
de-sac and the new drive. Mayor Mertensotto
questioned if the public parking would be away
from the Center and Mr. Malkowski answered
yes.
Mayor Mertensotto then asked for questions and
comments from the audience. There being no
questions or comments, Councilmember Hartmann
moved to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Anderson moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-26, "RESOLUTION APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZING THE DODGE NATURE
CENTER TO CONSTRUCT A VISITOR'S CENTER", with
the following modifications as discussed:
1. That the visitor center be more
specifically set forth in the resolution
pursuant to the conditional use permit for
planned unit development.
2. To specifically include within the
approval of the resolution that the site
plan and date as submitted this evening by
the applicant.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
It was noted that Council must approve the
building plans before the building permit can
be issued.
CASE NO. 90 -09
Mr. Paul McGinley, of Paul McLagan and Son Land
GESELL
Surveyors, representing Mr. James Gesell, was
PRELIM. PLAT APP.
present to discuss Mr. Gessell's request to
subdivide his lot. Mr. McGinley explained that
Mr. Gessell owns a seven plus acre lot in the
R1 -A district at Dodd Road and Wentworth
Avenue. He explained that he is proposing to
subdivide the lot into two lots of 2.14 acres
and 5.01 acres. Mr. Gessell plans to
construct a new home on the 5 acre lot. He
further explained that the proposed house on
lot 2 will be in excess of one hundred feet
from the Wetlands. Mr. McGinley explained
that the variance request is for 150' of
frontage on the public street. Mr. McGinley
explained that the parcel is a large parcel
and that Mr. Gessell has chosen to have the
frontage of the house at 140' rather than 150'
to try and protect the value of the existing
home, the wetlands and so that the new home
would be concealed by the pine trees.
Mr. McGinley stated that there is no public
street accessing the property. Mayor
Mertensotto questioned how long the easement
is from Dodd Road to the south property. Mr.
McGinley stated that it is approximately about
500 to 600 feet. Mayor Mertensotto stated
that some day there will be a need for a
right -of -way and expressed his concerns on how
the City could get a right -of -way in the
future. Mr. McGinley stated that at this time
there will two residences using the driveway.
Mr. McGinley referred to the street
circulation plan submitted to Council for
their review. Mayor Mertensotto stated that
public streets in this -area -are not needed
currently but that there could be need in the
future with regards to the issue of
maintenance or city services such as sewer and
water. He expressed his concern with how
those services would be installed if there is
no public right-of-way. He further commented
that there may be a need for the land owners
to consider a plan for getting public streets
into this area. Mr. McGinley stated that it
was suggested by the Planning Commission that
a public utility easement should be provided
across Lot 1, the southerly 30 feet, if public
utilities are ever brought in. Public Works
Danielson stated that an easement at this time
would facilitate easy installation of
utilities in the future.
Councilmember Cummins clarified that both of
the lots being created through this
subdivision exceed the minimum R1 -A size
requirement. Mr. McGinley concurred by
stating that the smallest of the two lots
would be 93,378 square feet and the second lot
would be five times as large as the first lot.
Councilmember Blesener questioned if the road
easement to serve these homes is a restrictive
easement and if the City has an obligation to
not create a land locked parcel. She
questioned if the land owners need to provide
the City with evidence that they have a right
to use the easement. Public Works Director
Danielson stated that that is what the
variance request is saying, that it does not
have frontage on a public street.
Councilmember Blesener questioned what would
happen if there were disagreements between the
residents and wondered if the City should be
protected. Attorney Hart stated that that is
a private matter and that the residents would
have to negotiate that privately.
Councilmember Cummins moved to grant the
requested preliminary plat for the Gessell
subdivision subject to the provision of a
public utility easement along Lot 1 to be made
available to Lot 2 and to grant a variance to
the required 1501 of frontage along a public
street.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
FIRE CODE Mayor Mertensotto explained to Mr. McGinley
that the final plat should be changed to show
the easement. Mr. McGinley stated that it was
suggested by Public Works Director Danielson
that the easement should be located on the
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
south 30 feet of Lot 1 and that he would
change the final plat.
Fire Marshal Paul Kaiser was present to
discuss the proposed amendments to the Fire
Prevention Code. He explained that every time
there is a change in code, there is also a
change in the article that applies to that
particular ordinance section. He explained
that that is the reason why the ordinance has
been updated. Mayor Mertensotto stated that a
summary of this ordinance should be published
noting the changes in the ordinance.
Fire Marshal Kaiser briefly explained the
changes in the code. He explained that the
owners of existing commercial buildings are
required to provide current "as built"
information to the Fire Department. He
further stated that yearly maintenance tests
for both the sprinkler system and fire alarms
systems is required for commercial buildings.
Mayor Mertensotto questioned if the
requirement for providing the City with "as
builts" is creating a financial burden to the
commercial residents. Fire Marshal Kaiser
stated that it should not be a great expense
and that it is just the architectural plans
that will be required. Councilmember Blesener
stated that the request for these inspections
will be at the discretion of the Fire Marshal.
Fire Marshal Kaiser concurred and stated that
fire codes can be appealed at anytime.
Fire Marshal Kaiser explained that Section 9.8
specifically applies to multiple dwellings.
He explained that this would help the owners
of the dwellings by cutting down the number of
false alarms due to faulty maintenance. He
explained that most of the multiple dwellings
in the area have maintenance contracts. He
stated that this section will require the
owners to submit a copy of the maintenance
record to the Fire Department. In response to
a question from Councilmember Cummins, Fire
Marshal Kaiser stated that these requirements
are imposed in many other municipalities that
has a Fire Marshal.
Councilmember Anderson questioned if there
have been problems with building owners
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
MISCELLANEOUS
maintaining these records and Fire Marshal
Kaiser answered yes.
Fire Chief Maczko stated that the information
will be stored in the Fire Department's
computer system.
Fire Marshal Kaiser explained that all new
buildings are required to submit "as built"
plans. He stated that this amendment would
apply when remodeling occurs. He further
commented that at this point in time he is not
aware of any remodeling taking place in the
City.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to adopt
Ordinance No. 270, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 239".
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
In an unrelated matter, Councilmember Blesener
questioned if there are any requirements in
the Fire Prevention Code that regulates home
incinerators. Fire Marshal Kaiser stated that
there have been some complaints of burning in
the Ivy Falls area. He stated that this is
not addressed through the fire prevention code
but through the Pollution Control Agency.
Fire Marshal Kaiser stated that records are on
file of complaints received.
SOUTH METRO Fire Chief John Maczko was present to discuss
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL the proposed South Metro Hazardous Material
RESPONSE TEAM Response Team Joint Powers Agreement. Mayor
Mertensotto noted the changes in projections
of the budget. He stated that there was a
change in how a municipality could withdraw
from the agreement. He explained that the
agreement states that a majority of the Cities
would have to be in agreement in order for a
City to withdraw from the contract.
In response to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Fire Chief Mackzo explained that
the board would consist of one member per
participating City. He further explained that
officers are elected from the board.
Councilmember Anderson questioned if there
would be a chance in the future that there
would be other adjacent communities that might
want to participate. Fire Chief Maczko stated
that there is a possibility. He explained
that the State Fire Chief's Association is
working through the Legislature to try and get
a regional team concept addressed.
Attorney Hart stated that, in regards to
withdrawing from the contract, it appears that
the City has an opportunity to withdraw
annually before August 1st by filing a Notice
of Intent to withdraw effective as of December
31st of the following year, that that does not
apply for the first five years. He stated
that the City would be basically locked in for
the first five years.
Mayor Mertensotto directed Attorney Tom Hart
to discuss Sections 13 and 14.1 with one of
the attorneys involved, Mr. Roger Smith of
South St. Paul to find out the purpose and
interpretation of those sections.
Administrator Lawell stated that the Cities of
Eagan and Burnsville have had some questions
over the financial contribution. He stated
that on May 23rd the City Managers of Dakota
County are going to discuss with their
respective Fire personnel about the financial
arrangements for this type of agreement. He
explained that it is their hope that they will
convince the two communities that the funding
mechanism set forth is a fair and an equitable
one. He suggested that the matter should be
brought back to Council at the first meeting
in June.
Mayor Mertensotto concurred and directed staff
to research the information in question and to
bring it back for Council consideration at
their June meeting.
WORKER'S COMPENSA- The Council briefly discussed memorandum from
TION INSURANCE Treasurer Shaughnessy regarding worker's
compensation. Treasurer Shaughnessy explained
the City has carried workmen's compensation
insurance through the League pool which is
administered by Employee Benefit Association.
Treasurer Shaughnessy explained that the City
has been given the option of an experience
based premium rather than one based on the
pool. He further explained that the idea
would be to enter the option agreement and use
any refund the City might receive to establish
an insurance reserve. He stated that this
reserve could then be used to supplement the
budget amount in any year of poor experience.
He stated that the actual budget premium would
remain the same as the early years and once
the City gets a reserve built up, the City
could gradually lower the budget amount.
Councilmember Cummins questioned what would
happen if the City runs into a bit of bad
luck. Treasurer Shaughnessy stated that the
City's premium would be $82,000. He stated
that would be 130 percent of what our standard
premium is, regardless of how bad our claims
were.
Councilmember Cummins moved to approve
entering into the refund option agreement with
regards to the workmen's compensation program
with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust from May 1, 1990 to May 1, 1991.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
RESCHEDULING The Council acknowledged a memo from the City
OF COUNCIL MEETING Clerk regarding the rescheduling of the
of the July 3, 1990 regular City Council
meeting due to the Forth of July holiday.
Councilmember Blesener moved to reschedule the
July 3, 1990 regular City Council meeting to
Tuesday, July 10, 1990 at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
AIR NOISE Council acknowledged a memorandum from
DISCUSSION Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding
a proposed resolution opposing airport
expansion plans involving a third, northern
parallel runway.
Councilmember Cummins moved to adopt
Resolution No. 90 -27, "A RESOLUTION OPPOSING
THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORT COMMISSION'S AIRPORT
EXPANSION DESIGNS FOR A NORTHERN PARALLEL
RUNWAY ".
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Administrator Lawell briefly discussed with
the Council what other communities are doing
to address the airport issue. He stated that
there is a lot of activity going on in terms
of the airport, i.e., expansion on the site,
siting process in terms of moving the airport,
and the blue ribbon task force which has yet
to meet. He explained that because of the
importance of this issue a workshop could be
organized to discuss the airport issues.
It was the consensus of the Council to organize
a workshop in June or July to discuss the
airport issue. Council further directed
Administrator Lawell to attend the next MASAC
meeting to note the City's displeasure in the
blue ribbon task force by indicating that the
sixty day time frame is up and that the City
has not been afforded a fair and equitable
hearing of the Mendota Heights proposal.
LEAGUE OF The Council was reminded of the annual
CITIES CONFER. League of Minnesota Cities Conference scheduled
for June 12-15.
SOLID WASTE ISSUES The City Council directed Administrator
Lawell to contact Dakota County staff
to invite Commissioner Chapdelaine and
County Commissioner Lyle Wray to discuss
solid waste issues on June 5, 1990
at 7:00 P.M.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned to 7:30 P.M. on May
2nd for the Board of Review meeting.
Councilmember Anderson seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:30 o'clock P.M.
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
ATTEST:
� l
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor