Loading...
1991-08-06 Council minutesPage No. 3068 August 6, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, August 6, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Koch and Smith. Councilmember Cummins had notified Council that he would be late. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Smith moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the draft minutes of the June 23, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgement of the Code Enforcement monthly report for June. c. Approval of the purchase of six Motorola Minitar III replacement pagers for the Fire Department through the Minnesota State Fire Consortium for a total cost of $2,502.00. d. Approval of the permanent appointment of Police Officer Neil Garlock, retroactive to July 16, 1991. e. Approval of the reservation of the Roger's Lake Park tennis courts by the Convent of the Visitation School for the period of August 12th through October 20th during the hours of 3 P.M. to 5 P.M., Monday through Friday. f. Approval of a modified critical area site plan for Mr. & Mrs. Dave Nelson, to allow Page No. 3069 August 6, 1991 construction of a new home on Lot 2, Block 1, Tuminelly's Hunter Lane Addition, along with refund of the $100.00 critical area application fee. g. Approval of a modified critical area site plan for Mr. John Polymeros to allow construction of a kitchen and deck addition at 1034 Mayfield Heights Lane, along with refund of the critical area application fee. h. Approval of the issuance of a wetlands permit to Mr. & Mrs. Raymond Ruble, to allow construction of a deck/patio to within 77 feet of the wetlands area at 629 Hampshire Lane. i. Approval of the issuance of a wetlands permit to Mr. & Mrs. Robert Flynn to allow construction of a porch at 1299 Laura Street to within 94 feet of Ivy Creek. j. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated August 6, 1991 and attached hereto. k. Approval of the list of claims dated August 6, 1991 and totalling $292,222.93. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LENNOX BUILDING PERMIT Council acknowledged a report from Public Works Director Danielson and Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding a request from United Properties for site plan approval and building permit. United Properties proposes to construct a 30,517 square foot office/warehouse in the Mendota Heights Business Park, across from the Big Wheel/Rossi building. It was noted that the applicant also requests reconfirmation of variances for sign setback and parking stall width, a change in street name from LeMay Drive to Commerce Drive, and approval to construct 42 of the required 51 parking spaces with associated approval on proof of parking for nine future spaces at the northwest corner of the building. In addition Council had previously approved "pay as You Go" TIF for the site. Staff recommended that Council also consider additional $25,000 of TIF for construction of Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 3070 August 6, 1991 • storm water holding pond to be authorized as • credit against United Properties' assessments for public improvements to be installed to serve the plat. Councilmember Blesener moved to approve the site plan as presented, reaffirming previously granted variances for a 20 foot sign setback, a 4 per 1000 parking ratio, allowing an 8 1/2 foot parking stall width, approval of a nine stall "proof of parking" plan, and a ten foot side yard setback variance adjacent to future T.H. 13, and to authorize staff to issue the building permit for the Lennox building contingent on future consent agenda approval of landscape and grading plans. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance renaming LeMay avenue to Commerce Drive and to authorize the Mayor to execute the ordinance. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize $25,000 of Tax Increment Financing for construction of the storm water holding pond as a credit against assessments. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. DEER CONTROL Council acknowledged a request from the DNR for approval of a three year Alternative Deer Control Program and an associated report from the City Administrator along with a proposed resolution to adopt the program and specific regulations for deer control within the City. Councilmember Koch moved adoption of Resolution No. 91 -42, "A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1991 - 1993 ALTERNATIVE DEER CONTROL PROGRAM AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PROGRAM REGULATIONS FOR DEER CONTROL ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY." Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 3071 August 6, 1991 CATHOLIC CEMETERIES Council acknowledged an application from the VARIANCE (CASE 91-29) Catholic Cemeteries for variances to allow four temporary signs at the Resurrection Cemetery entrances located on Lexington Avenue and Highway 110, and associated staff reports. Mr. Dave Kemp, representing the Catholic Cemeteries, responded to Council questions. Councilmember Smith moved to allow four temporary signs as requested, with a total of 113 square feet of area, for a period of three years with an option for two additional years on the condition that the applicants request renewal of the variances on a City Council consent calendar at the end of the three years. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 91-25, KAYOUM Mr. Abdul Kayoum was present to request approval of a four foot, three inch variance from the front yard setback at 706 First Avenue to allow construction of a garage addition and to approve two side yard setbacks to his existing home to bring it into conformance. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Councilmember Blesener moved to approve a four foot, three inch variance to the front yard setback at 706 First Avenue to allow construction of a garage addition as proposed, along with a one foot sideyard setback variance along the easterly property line and a two foot sideyard setback variance along the westerly property line to bring the existing home into conformance. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins arrived at 8:00 P.M. CASE NO. 91-27, Council acknowledged an application from STEHR Mr. & Mrs. Philip Stehr for a 4.2 foot side yard setback variance to allow construction of a garage addition at 6 Dorset Road. Councilmember Koch moved to grant a 4.2 foot side yard setback variance to allow the garage Page No. 3072 August 6, 1991 addition as proposed for 6 Dorset Road. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 90-35, Council acknowledged a report from the Public DUGGAN Works Director and Administrative Assistant regarding a request from Mr. & Mrs. Ultan Duggan for reconsideration of the July 16th denial of their application for wetlands permit for a fence. Mayor Mertensotto stated that although he voted with the prevailing side, he has since viewed the site and can find no basis for the denial. He stated that City ordinances are applied in the same manner for all subdivisions in the City and Council has no authority with respect to private covenants and therefore has no basis to deny a wetlands permit as long as the fence does not encroach on the 15 foot easement area around the pond. He noted that the applicants have modified their plan so that the entire fence is wrought iron, and all chain link has been eliminated. Mayor Mertensotto moved to reconsider the July 16, 1991 denial of the Duggan wetlands permit application for fence. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 2 Blesener Cummins Mrs. Joan Bjorklund presented the Duggans with a letter from the Copperfield Architectural Review Committee with respect to the covenants and restrictions relating to fences in the Copperfield Additions. Councilmember Blesener commented that on the same basis of not getting involved in enforcing restrictions and covenants, Council should not be getting involved in this type of issue when there is a neighborhood association bringing a recommendation to the City. She stated that she believes Council should take no action until the Architectural Review Committee and the homeowners association work things out - Council should not get involved in a neighborhood controversy. She also disagreed that there is no basis for denial, stating that the wetlands ordinance gives Council rights and discretion. Page No. 3073 August 6, 1991 Mayor Mertensotto responded that after viewing the property he can see no way that a wrought iron fence as proposed would cause an intrusion in the wetlands. Councilmember Blesener stated that the Council has acted repeatedly to deny variances, etc., when it has had objection from the neighborhood, even in cases where there has been overwhelming support from all but one or two individuals. A resident at 2354 Fieldstone Court, directly across the pond from the Duggan property, stated that he thinks he represents many silent neighbors who share a concern that the area's restrictions and covenants are going to be reviewed by the Council and who do not want that to happen. He stated that the fence is a neighborhood issue and should not be considered by Council, and that the Mayor has taken the right direction. He felt that if the wetlands issue has been resolved by the Planning commission, Council should take its recommendation. Councilmember Cummins stated that he has reviewed the wetlands ordinance since the last meeting and would be reluctant to vote in favor of the application. He stated that he does not support what is proposed and hopes that the neighbors take action in respect to the private covenants, which Council cannot get involved in. Mr. Jack Huber stated that he is concerned about the wildlife and the covenants. He further stated that he would laud the Council's granting of the permit because that would be consistent with what has been done throughout the City and hopes that the ARC responds appropriately. He felt that the focus should be on other problems in the neighborhood, such as roaming dogs. Mr. Mike Dwyer, 558 Stone Road, stated that he is both Chair of the Planning Commission, which made a recommendation to grant the permit, and is a resident of Copperfield who feels Council has been mislead. He stated that the only residents of Copperfield who were surveyed by the ARC about fences were those who surround the pond. He felt that it would be arbitrary and capricious for Council Page No. 3074 August 6, 1991 to deny the application when it has approved similar requests throughout the community - Copperfield should not be treated any differently. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the fence is proposed to be wrought iron on all four sides, fifteen feet from the high water mark and at least 6 inches inside the property line. He asked Mr. Duggan if he intends to maintain both sides of the fence. Mr. Duggan responded that it is his intent. Mayor Mertensotto moved to approve the application for wetlands permit to allow construction of the proposed fence on the conditions that it be wrought iron on all four sides, may not encroach on the wetlands easement area and be at least 15 feet from the high water mark. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Blesener RECESS Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 8:22. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 P.M. HEARINGS: CENTEX HOMES Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the CASE 91-23; LOCKWOOD purpose of a public hearing on an application DRIVE STREET VACATION from Centex Homes for the vacation of Lockwood Drive within Kensington and for rezoning, conditional use permit for PUD for Kensington Phase II, and for approval of wetlands permits and preliminary and final plat approval. Administrative Assistant Batchelder informed the audience that the planning applications are the culmination of more than 1 1/2 years of effort which began in 1990 when a Centex application for rezoning was denied. Subsequent to the denial, Centex developed an alternative plan which was submitted to the Planning Commission. In January, 1991 Centex filed suit against the City for failure to rezone. Following the initiation of the suit, Council directed the City Planner to prepare a southeast area scoping study with respect to land use in the area. Centex attended the presentation of the study and indicated to the City thereafter that they would be willing to negotiate a settlement to the suit. The negotiations began in April and continued for a three month period, during which time Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 3075 August 6, 1991 Council developed a set of criteria for the developer to meet in order for a•plan to be acceptable. Council accepted a concept plan from Centex on July 2nd and ordered public hearings by Council and the Planning Commission. Staff conducted an open house on the proposed plan on July 18th, and the Planning commission hearing was conducted on July 23rd. The Commission recommended approval of the plan currently proposed to Council. Mayor Mertensotto reviewed the street vacation request and asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing on the application for vacation of a portion of Lockwood Drive be closed. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that the Council, in arriving at a compromise settlement set down a number of criteria to control the development. As far as the rezoning, the property is partly zoned R-1A, R-1 and B. In order to accomplish the proposed PUD for Kensington Phase 2, rezoning to HR and MR PUD is required. He stated that he has no problem in granting rezoning but that it must be conditioned upon a developers agreement between the City and Centex. Centex has submitted a proposed agreement to City staff, but the Council has not yet reviewed the proposed agreement - Council review and approval must be a condition of any approvals. With respect to the conditional use permit for planned unit development, he stated that he again has no problem, conditioned upon the successful negotiation of a signed agreement. He further stated that it has been the City practice in conditional use permits for PUD to change the underlying zoning for the PUD. Council would not rezone the subject land but for this project, therefore there must be a signed developer's agreement for the CUP. He stated that the developer has also asked for preliminary and final plat approvals but pointed out that the final plat has not been submitted. Council could approve the preliminary plat with conditions which must be Page No. 3076 August 6, 1991 met, but that the final plat must come before Council for approval. Mr. John Bannigan, legal counsel for Centex, stated that the ground rules the Mayor set forth are to the advantage of Centex as well as the City. He felt that it is fair to all sides to approve the requests subject to the developer's agreement execution. Mayor Mertensotto stated that the CUP would be the covenant for the development of the land and runs with the land, and so does the developers agreement. He pointed out that any subsequent developer of the project would be bound by the conditional use permit for PUD and the developer's agreement. Mr. Bannigan stated that he feels it is fair to both parties to proceed on the basis of a signed developers agreement. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Joe Malzarek, 2545 Concord Way, stated that when he purchased his property he purchased on the basis of a sales brochure. The new proposed plan changes the character of Heritage Drive from four manor homes and a parking space to 22 homes with access to Heritage Drive and no parking spaces. He informed Council that tonight there were 6 to 7 cars parked on the street from the existing manor homes on Heritage Drive, and that there will be a serious problem if there are 22 homes and no off - street parking spaces. He stated that he understood that the Planning Commission recommendation was going to be that the existing manor homes be protected from dumping a heavy density load onto their streets and into their neighborhoods. He stated that he would have no objection to the plan if there were four manor homes on Heritage Drive and some off street parking rather than 22 homes. Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern over the claim of inadequate parking for the existing manor homes. Mr. Bannigan stated that the entire project has been de- intensified - there were 280 dwelling units proposed in the plan which was Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 3077 August 6, 1991 denied. He stated that Centex has substantially relieved pressure on the land and the streets and there are substantially fewer units than Mr. Malzarek would have been looking at if the project developed as proposed in the sales brochure to which he has referred. Mr. Tom Boyce, from Centex, showed Council the final plan on the sales brochure which shows a four -unit building on Heritage Drive in Phase I and another 4 unit building and one 8 unit building on Heritage in Phase 2. The new plan proposes a twelve unit building, six units of which face on Heritage, and a 10 unit building, five units of which face on Heritage. He stated that he would have no problem in trying to provide a couple of additional parking spaces for the existing manor homes. He also suggested that the residents start parking in their garages rather than on the street. Councilmember Cummins stated out that it appears that there will be less traffic on Heritage Drive under the current proposal because of the way the units face. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that screening of the parking areas, etc., was discussed in the planning report and that Centex has agreed to staff review and approval of the landscaping plan and City engineering review and approval of sewer and water lines. There being no further questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council would not be approving the rezoning but for the development proposed, therefore any action must be predicated upon entering into a signed developers agreement. The PUD will be the footprint for the development and cannot be changed without application for amendment. The PUD controls the development, whether it is in the hands of Centex or a future developer. The developers agreement will also control the development. The developer has indicated that a forester will mark existing trees. Lot adjustments can be made in the Page No. 3078 August 6, 1991 final plat as Council is aware of them, and as long as the criteria is established which tells how many lots there must be of specific sizes. He stated that there must also be adjustment to the park areas in the preliminary plat. He stated that there are ground rules in force and that the developer has agreed that all of the single family lots will meet City ordinances with respect to setbacks, etc. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 91 -43, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF STREET RIGHT OF WAYS AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS," on the condition that the vacation will not be certified until the developers agreement for Kensington Phase II has been executed. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 277, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401," to rezone Centex property from R -1, R -1A and R -1B to MR -PUD, and Ordinance No 278, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401," to rezone Centex property from R -1 and R -1A to HR -PUD, on the condition that the ordinances will not be published or effective until after execution of the developers agreement for Kensington Phase II. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 91 -44, "RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR KENSINGTON PHASE II," to approve a conditional use permit conditioned upon execution of a developers agreement. Ayes: 5 Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Nays: 0 Councilmember Blesener stated that she feels Council has compromised to the point where it has lost some opportunities it will not have again. The development proposed in 1990 provided for 34 acres of park as opposed to 13 in the current plan, and also although the number of multiple family units have decreased, single family structures have increased and statistics show that greater traffic is generated by single family units. She felt that the City has lost its option to Page No. 3079 August 6, 1991 provide diversified housing for the community as its population ages. KENSINGTON PRELIMINARY It was noted that the preliminary plat for PLAT Kensington Phase II generally reflects the conditions of the settlement agreement but that the final plat must include drainage and utility easements. Councilmember Smith moved approval of the preliminary plat for Kensington Phase II conditioned that it will not be effectively approved until after execution of a developers agreement. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 KENSINGTON WETLANDS Mayor Mertensotto stated that a number of the PERMITS proposed single family lots in Kensington Phase II do not meet the 100 foot wetlands setback requirement. Councilmember Smith stated that Council is being asked to approve a number of wetlands permits as the lots are shown on the preliminary plat. She asked whether the setbacks will need to be amended in the future if the plat needs adjustment to preserve trees and the scenic easement area. Mayor Mertensotto responded that lot lines cannot be amended once the final plat is approved and that he sees no reason why Council could not make adjustments in the wetlands setbacks in the future for proper reasons with the understanding that it is not a matter of right. Mr. Bannigan stated that the developers understand they must be sensitive to saving existing trees, as the Planning Commission had recommended, and understands that they can move building pads away from the wetlands and trees as long as they do not violate the basic criteria. He stated that, with respect to the trees, the developers will not necessarily know whether lot lines need to be shifted until grading occurs. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he does not want to build in hardships and would have no problem with changing wetlands permits because of shifting for trees, but that sideyard Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 3080 August 6, 1991 setbacks are a different matter. He stated that he appreciates the concern to save some of the trees but before the developer prepares the final plat he will know what needs to be shifted. It was recognized that the developer should have the right to request minor variances in the wetlands permit configurations where needed to preserve existing trees. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of wetlands permits in accordance with the exhibit presented to Council this evening (page four of the staff report dated August 2, 1991) and reaffirm the wetlands permits for Block 7 which have been previously approved, conditioned upon execution of a developers agreement. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he is concerned about balancing the soil amounts in the grading of the site. He stated that the City may wish to proceed with developing the park and asked how that would fit into the developers grading plans. Mr. Boyce responded that he does not know until he sees the City plan, and that he proposes to start with the single family and carriage homes right away. Councilmember Blesener stated that the City may well have to grade more of the site than it wants to in order to balance quantities. Mr. Boyce stated that he will be balancing fill and that the City can have excess fill from the development. Grading plans will be submitted to the City next week. Council expressed the desire that construction access to the park property be available in 1992 and that paved public access be available in 1993. CAT CONTROL Council acknowledged a report from the Police Chief regarding a proposed cat control ordinance. Chief Delmont and Mr. Ralph Johnson were present for the discussion. Chief Delmont stated that Council had directed him to meet with Mr. Johnson and come up with a compromise between the proposed ordinance presented on July 16th and doing nothing. He Page No. 3081 August 6, 1991 felt the City must weigh the impact of the draft ordinances on all of the citizens against the concerns of other citizens. Mayor Mertensotto asked Mr. Johnson why he sees the necessity for a cat control ordinance. Mr. Johnson responded that he has no objection to people having cats as pets but when they are allowed to run at large they create problems for the environment, themselves and the community. He felt that cats should be treated the same as dogs. Chief Delmont stated that it would be extremely difficult to enforce the proposed cat ordinance and the Police Department policy would be to not strictly enforce it. He informed Council that the department has only three cat complaints on file, including the complaint from Mr. Johnson and his neighbor. Councilmember Cummins stated that he has never received complaints about cats. He further stated that the Police Department is already working to maximum capacity and if Council adopted the cat controls they would largely be unenforceable. Mr. Earl Christie, 1064 Esther Lane, stated that he has owned cats for 28 years and has never had any complaints from his neighbors. With respect to the proposed leashing requirement, he stated that he has tried putting his current cat on a leash but has never been able to break the cat to it. Councilmember Smith stated that she would have difficulty voting for an ordinance that cannot be enforced. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has had three or four complaints about cats and has had to respond that the City has no ordinance controlling cats except the nuisance ordinance. He stated that even though the Police Chief has indicated that the ordinance would not be aggressively enforced, adoption of the ordinance would provide regulations. Councilmember Blesener agreed, stating that Council must acknowledge that there must be a tool available to deal with problem cats. Page No. 3082 August 6, 1991 Mr. Johnson stated that several surrounding communities have similar ordinances and have had no problems with them. He has spoken to his neighbors who let their cats run, but has had no success since there is no ordinance to give him some leverage. He did not feel that the ordinance would create a hardship for anyone. Councilmember Cummins suggested that perhaps the leverage Mr. Johnson seeks is to amend the trapping ordinance without amending the animal control ordinance, which would give him the ability to humanely trap cats on his property. Mr. Johnson responded that he favors leashing and licensing of cats. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Ordinance No. 279, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 914,11 to permit the humane trapping of domestic animals. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Mertensotto moved adoption of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 1301. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 2 Nays: 3 Cummins Koch Smith COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Cummins informed council that he would be absent from the August 20th meeting. Councilmember Smith stated that she will not be present at the September 3rd meeting. Councilmember Blesener informed Council she would be absent from the October 1st meeting. Councilmember Koch stated that the trail from Somerset School is overgrown and dense. Mayor Mertensotto asked what is being done about weed growth in the Mendakota Park. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Koch moved that the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ATTEST: _: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Page No. 3083 August 6, 1991 meeting be adjourned to the August 7th budget workshop. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:17 o'clock P.M. athleen M. Swanson City Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL August 6, 1991 Concrete Licenses Concrete Specialists, Inc. Hart Masonry, Inc. Kroon Masonry Simon Brothers Cement Co. SteinKraus Construction Zierhut Brick & Stone Excavating Licenses Capitol Utilities Marty Brothers Schield Construction Co. Gas Piping Licenses Boehm Heating Company Horwitz, Inc. Johnson, Dale-Plumbing Suburban Air General Contractors Licenses All Poolside Services, Inc. Bald Eagle Siding Barrington Homes Bruggeman Construction Builders & Remodelers, Inc. Design 1 Ltd. Fenc-co, Inc. GenErik Htg. & Cooling, Inc. Heartland Industries Keystone Builders Corporation Kopp, C.E.-Const. Co., Inc. Lundgren Bros. Const., Inc. Pfoser Construction Co. Single Ply Systems Theis Construction Co. Van Horn & Son Const. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Horwitz, Inc. Suburban Air Conditioning Plaster License Hendrickson Bros. Drywall, Inc. Suburban Stucco