Loading...
2006-09-05 City Council minutesSeptember 5, 2006 Page I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA I Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, September 5, 2006 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Huber called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The following members were present: Mayor Huber, Councilmembers Duggan, Krebsbach, Schneeman and Vitelli. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Vitelli asked if the Infill issue could be added to the agenda and why the Council is waiting so long as the public hearing has been closed. Councilmember Krebsbach suggested that it be put onto the next agenda to give more time for discussion. Mayor Huber said he may not be available for the next meeting. Councilmember Vitelli said he would like to see the parking discussion on the next agenda as well. Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of the agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Schneeman moved to approve the minutes of the August 15, 2006 council meeting minutes as corrected. Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED September 5, 2006 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting, revised to remove items 6c, 6i, 6k, and 60, along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgement of the NDC4 Meeting Minutes and Agenda. b. Acknowledgement of the NDC4 Draft 2007 Budget. e. Aeknewledgement of the minutes from the A-ugus e—,2006T-arl�p , 1. *�*� Meet* . d. Acknowledgement of the minutes from the August 22nd , 2006 Planning Commission Meeting. e. Acknowledgement of the Summary of the Meeting with MHAA. f, Acknowledgement of the August 2006 Building Activity Report. g. Acknowledgement of the July 2006 Monthly Fire Department Report. h. Authorization for Out of State Training for Officer Eric Petersen. i. Authorization for- Handgtm PuEehase. j. Authorization for Network Router Purchase. k. Auffierization for- Mayer to sign Engagement Lett with HLB Tautges Redpath fei: 2006 Audit. 1. Approval of Date Change for September Parks & Recreation Conunission Meeting. m. Approval of Date Change for September Airports Relations Commission Meeting. n. Approval of Sam K-uchinka's Successful Completion of Probationary Period. e. Approval of AppeiRtment of Lake Sedlaeel Assistant to Gity Administr-ator- Position. p. Approval for Sign Pen-nit for Associated Bureaus Headquarters site at 1500 Commerce Drive. q. Adoption of Resolution No. 06-73: "A resolution approving a minor amendment to the planned unit development for signage for Sage Market, the Dom Company, and State Farm Insurance at the Town Center Redevelopment Project". r. Adoption of Resolution No. 06-74: "A resolution adjusting fire department salaries effective January 1, 2006". s. Adoption of Resolution No. 06-75: "A resolution approval final plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for construction September 5, 2006 Page 3 of Somerset Neighborhood Rainwater Gardens (Project 200516)". t. Adoption of Resolution No. 06-76: "A resolution adopting policy concerning the construction of fences around city storm water ponds and wetlands". u. Approval of the List of Contractors. v. Approval of the List of Claims dated September 5, 2006 and totaling $244,319.97. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED ITEMS PULLED FOR Item #6c: DISCUSSIONS Councilmember Krebsbach asked to have updated reports on the MHAA budget, and updated information on the participants of the teams, specialized neighborhood parks, gym space. Councilmember Krebsbach said she would like to have better communication regarding the ISD #197 and their field space/usage. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED Item #6i: Councilmember Duggan said he was concerned about the high cost of the gun proposal, but now understands that the high cost of this request is because the police officers needed different grips to accommodate each officer. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the Handgun Purchase as proposed. Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion. Item #6k: Councilmember Schneeman said she wanted to make sure that it was understood that the fees that will be paid to the accountants will not exceed what has been agreed on, and should any additional time be needed, the fee change would be reviewed by Kristen Schabacker. September 5, 2006 Page 4 Councilmernber Vitelli said he supports Ms. Schabacker at any time she would feel the need to seek bids from other financial institutions. Ms. Schabacker said she is fine with retaining HLB Tautges Redpath and this will be their fourth year of auditing for the City. Ms. Schabacker said it would be fine if the City Council decides to seek bids for next year. Councilmernber Vitelli moved approval to continue the current contract with HLB Tautges Redpath to perfonn the 2006 audit at a cost of $33,600, and to have Mayor Huber sign the engagement letter. Councilmernber Vitelli seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED Item 60: Mayor Huber introduced the new Assistant to the City Administrator, Mr. Jake Sedlacek. Mr. Sedlacek gave a brief history of his past experience. Councihnember Krebsbach moved to approve the hiring of Jake Sedlacek as the Assistant to the City Administrator. Councilmernber Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED PUBLIC COMMENTS None were received at this time. HEARING: SAGE MARKET City Clerk Swanson stated that Council had previously & WINE BAR approved a wine license for the Sage Market and Wine Bar. The applicant, Bob Kowalski, is now seeking an additional license to serve 3.2 beer and to serve wine on Sundays. The Sunday wine license is supplemental to the wine license previously approved. Mr. Kowalski said he has had numerous requests from residents to serve wine on Sunday and 3.2 beer all week. Councilmernber Krebsbach said she is concerned about this establishment turning into a sports bar. Also, Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED Ayes: 4 Nays: I (Councilperson Krebsbach) MOTION CARRIED September 5, 2006 Page 5 Mendota Plaza has expressed interest in a beer license for some time and has not yet come before Council for a license. She des not support beer at the wine bar. Mr. Kowalski assured the City Council that it was not his intent to have televisions and a sports bar business. Councilmember Schneeman said she was in support of the beer license because she has received comments from residents that do not drink wine, and would like to have the alternative of beer. Councilmember Vitelli said he is in fall support of this request as there is no other place to go in the City to enjoy a glass of wine or a glass of beer. Mayor Huber asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no question or comments, Councilmember Duggan moved that the public hearing be closed. Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the Special Sunday On-Sale Wine license as proposed. Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. Councilmeraber Duggan moved approval of the 3.2 On- Sale Malt Liquor license as proposed. Councilineinber Schneeman seconded the motion. City Clerk Swanson asked if the City Council wishes to waive the two-week waiting period on the 3.2 On-Sale Malt Liquor license. Councib-neinber Duggan moved to add the friendly amendment to waive the two-week waiting period as proposed. September 5, 2006 Page 6 Councilmember Schneeman accepted this amendment. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: I (Councilmernber Krebsbach) MOTION CARRIED ALLEY VACATION City Engineer McDermott said Staff received a request from Mr. Ken Noack of 677 4th Avenue to vacate some alley that runs between his two parcels. This alley had not been vacated in 1990 when the original alley was vacated. Ms. McDermott said the applicant would like to combine his lots and create a 35,640 sq. ft. lot. Staff recommends that these alley remnants be vacated as they have no public use. Mr. Noack said he is requesting this vacation as it will affect his property taxes. Mayor Huber opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forth to speak, Mayor Huber closed the public hearing. Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 06-77: "A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF AN ALLEY" as proposed. Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED BID AWARD City Finance Director Kristen Schabacker said that bids were received for the sale of bonds today for the 2006 Industrial Street Rehabilitation project. Ms. Schabacker confirmed that the City has an AA2 rating. Ms. Schabacker introduced Stacie Kvilvang from Ehlers and Associates to present the results. Ms. Kvilvang gave a brief review of her report. Mayor Huber moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 06-78: "A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $630,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006A, PLEDGING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR September 5, 2006 Page 7 THE SECURITY THEREOF AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF". Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED PLANNING CASE 06-26 Ms. McDennott introduced the case in which the JACQUELINE PETERSON applicant is seeking a conditional use pen-nit to 871 Cheri Lane construct a detached garage. This request has been recommended by the Planning Commission for approval. Ms. Peterson said her existing garage needs replacement. Mayor Huber opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forth to speak, Mayor Huber closed the public hearing. Councilmember Vitelli moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 06-79: "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE AT 871 CHERI LANE". Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED PLANNING CASE 06-27 Ms. McDermott introduced the case in which the MARCO SCIBORA applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to construct a 6-ft. fence on his property line at 647 Sibley Memorial Highway. A CUP is needed to allow a 6-ft. fence within the 30-ft. front yard setback. The applicant is also seeking a Critical Area Permit to construct a fence in his back yard which is in the Critical Area. A variance is also needed for this fence as the applicant is proposed to place this fence within the 40-ft bluff setback. Mr. Scibora explained how he wishes to construct the fencing around his property. The front fencing is proposed to enhance the curbside while still confonning to the neighborhood landscape, as well as providing September 5, 2006 Page 8 safety to the homeowner and visitors. Mr. Scibora talked about safety concerns of Highway 13 traffic and the rear yard slope. Mr. Scibora shared pictures of his property and explained how the fencing will enhance the property and provide the needed safety. Mr. Scibora said he currently resides at 767 Winslow, Saint Paul, Minnesota, and that his son is currently living in the home at 647 Sibley Memorial Highway. Mr. Scibora also shared photos of other properties that he has remodeled and landscaped, one being the Berwood Hill B &B in Lanesboro, Minnesota. Mr. Scibora commented on the neighboring properties, showing how some of them have huge hedging that hides the homes, and at the same time, the City's vision is to provide an open and airy atmosphere in the City. Councihneinber Krebsbach asked for confirmation on the placement of the front fencing. Ms. McDermott said the applicant wishes to place the fencing right along the property line, which is between 18 -ft and 20 -ft from the edge of the street. Councihnernber Krebsbach confirmed that the ordinance requires fencing to be 30- ft. from the property line for a 6 -ft. fence. Ms. McDermott said a 3 -ft. fence could be placed within the 30 -ft. setback. Councilmember Schneeman said the house is beautiful. Councilmember Schneeman said she drove down Lilydale Road and looked up the slope to see the clear cutting that was done on the neighbor's property and said it looks horrible. Councilmeraber Schneeman said she believes a fence along the back of the applicant's property would be visible from the bottom of the slope. Councilmember Schneeman said she would not be supportive of a fence in the back yard, and has not heard of any instance where anyone was injured on that slope. Councilmember Vitelli asked if an 8 -foot hedge would be pennitted under the zoning ordinance. Mr. Danielson said vegetation can be planted without a permit. Mr. Burt Anderson, 643 Sibley Memorial Highway, is the neighbor two houses down from the applicant. Mr. 1, Anderson said the Planning Commission recommended 1 September 5, 2006 Page 9 denial of this application and feels that the City Council should do so also. Hedging such as he has is more appropriate for the neighborhood and feels that fencing as proposed would lead to proliferation of fencing in the area. The proposed fence would also be ornamental and would not be sufficient for safety issues. Mr. Tom Sullivan, 641 Sibley Memorial Highway, said he is against the back yard fencing. All the neighbors along the bluff line have the same problem and have learned to live with it. Mr. Sullivan opposes the back yard fencing. Mr. Paul Haggerty, 645 Sibley Memorial Highway, said he was in support of the application, and feels that the Scibora's do a wonderful job in their remodeling and landscaping projects. Mr. Haggerty said he spoke with the Huestis' that live directly next to the Scibora's on the other side and they are completely supportive of this application. Councilmember Duggan asked the applicant if there are any plans to come back to the City asking for rezoning for a bed and breakfast. Mr. Scibora said he would not. Councilmember Krebsbach said there seems to be some options for the applicant and would not support the variance for the front yard as she does not feel that the applicant would make full use of that portion of the yard. Councihneinber Krebsbach said that the Planning Commission rarely votes unanimous on a decision to turn applications down. Councilmember Krebsbach said she is in favor of supporting it completely but would be open to arguments regarding the safety in the back yard. Mayor Huber said there is a lot of fencing along Highway 13 and said there are numerous different kinds of fencing in that area, mostly with some type of vegetation around them. Mayor Huber said he is not convinced that the proposed fence would contribute to a "closing in" feeling, and is not overly concerned about the proposal for the front fence. Councilmember Duggan said he doesn't agree with the idea of putting the fence 30 -ft. back and dividing the September 5, 2006 Page 10 property up. Councilmember Duggan asked if the applicant would consider putting in a fence in that would be 4 -ft in height at the ends, and .come down to 3- ft. in the middle. Councilmember Duggan said all the fencing the applicant currently has is gorgeous and is the most distinguished fencing the Mendota Heights that he knows o£ Councilmember Duggan said he is not happy with the idea of the fencing in the back as there is enough growth and shrubbery in that area, however, if the applicant continues with the stone wall that is already back there, it would be just as visible as a fence. Councilmember Duggan said he would be willing to table this application to see what the applicant's gate design will be. Councilmember Vitelli said he supports the proposal because it's a very eloquent proposal and would add tremendous value to the home and their neighborhood. Councilmember Vitelli said the front fencing will be in the ditch and passerby's may only see the top 3 -ft. from the road. Councilmember Vitelli said as far as openness, the neighboring shrubs along the roadway do not give the openness that the City is looking for. The proposed fencing would give much more openness than the shrubbery. Councilmember Vitelli said he has no problem with the fence along the back at the bluff as it will not be that visible, and the fencing is not ugly. Councilmember Duggan asked Councilmember if he would be supportive of tabling this applicant for a few weeks to allow the applicant to come back with some revisions to the architectural and landscape drawings to show the gates. Councilmember Vitelli said the applicant wants to close in the yard, and he would easily put in a 3 -ft chain link fence all around the sides and front, even up to the roadway, but it would look terrible. Councilmember Vitelli said the only issue in his opinion is that this is an eloquent proposal that he fully supports because it is so much better in his opinion than a 3 -ft chain link fence or cedar fence. Councilmember Vitelli said he also supports the fencing for the back yard and does not see a problem with that, as it would be worse to plant a giant hedge that would obstruct the view of the river. September 5, 2006 Page 11 Councihnember Schneeman said she does not care about the front yard so much, but is definitely against the Critical Area Pen-nit for the back yard as fencing is not needed and it may lead to proliferation of fencing along the bluff line. Councihnember Krebsbach asked the applicant why he needs to be so close to the road. Mr. Scibora said space is the most important element of design. Councihmember Duggan moved to table action on the application to a future meeting to allow the applicant to gather more information and design revisions for the front fence and gate. Councihnember Schneeman seconded the motion. Councilmeraber Vitelli asked the applicant if that would be timely for him to prepare and come back to the City Council. Mr. Scibora said he was fine with that. Councihnember Vitelli said, in consideration of the applicant, he would support the motion if the applicant can come back in two weeks so he can proceed with the work. Councihnember Schneeman asked if the application can be split into two parts: one resolution for the Critical Area Permit and one resolution for the Conditional Use Permit. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED PLANNING CASE 06 -28 Ms. McDermott introduced the case in which the KRAVITZ / SCHORER applicant is seeking a critical area permit for slope restoration in their rear yard at 739 Knollwood Court. The Planning Conunission recommends approval of this application. Councihmember Vitelli asked about the tarp and debris that was currently on this site. Dr. Kravitz said the tarp is there to prevent more damage and will be removed. There are some pipes at the bottom that will correct during the restoration process. Councihnember Vitelli said he would recommend the i lower part of the cliff be restored as much as possible so September 5, 2006 Page 12 it's aesthetically pleasing to people looking at it from the other side. Ms. McDermott said that was part of the conditions, and added another condition to have the temporary piping installed by September 30, 2006 to prevent further erosion of the hill in the event of rain. Councilmeinber Krebsbach asked for confirmation that this project will be of the same quality as that of the Pipers. Ms. McDermott said this would be the same design and quality, and has spoken to the Piper's contractor who confirmed this. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if there were any issues about access. Dr. Kravitz said he now has some verbal agreement with the Piper's where he will now be accessing the property from the Piper's property. Dr. Kravitz said the restoration will be done with access via either the Piper property or having a crane on his property lowering the equipment. Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 06-28: "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CRITICAL AREA PERMIT FOR SLOPE RESTORATION AT 739 KNOLLWOOD COURT". Councilmeraber Schneeman seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED DISCUSSION OF UNITED Ms. McDermott said she and Steve Grittman met with PROPERTIES REZONING Drew Johnson from United Properties, who is interested in rezoning the property on the northeast comer of Pilot Knob Road and 1-494. Mr. Grittinan has recommended B-3, General Business District. Mr. Johnson is proposing a gas station/convenience store and a separate building that would have local retail such as small restaurant/coffee shop. Mr. Johnson is seeking feedback from the City Council on this project. Mr. Johnson reviewed the plans they would like to pursue. After some discussion, the City Council came to the consensus that a gas station would not be a good fit, as the bright lights would not fit well into this area. The City Council would be more open to September 5, 2006 Page 13 seeing plans for some type of restaurant in that area, or other retail that may have more inuted lighting. DISCUSSION OF CITY OF Ms. McDermott said earlier this year, the City of MENDOTA REQUEST FOR Mendota requested a waten-nain extension to serve WATERMAIN EXTENSION Lots 33, 34, and 35 of a new plat called Mendota Ridge Villa 2nd. At that time, the City Council tabled the decision because the City sent a letter requesting an EAW (Enviromnental Assessment Worksheet) be performed. Since that time, the City has received a response from Councilmeraber Golias, and Ms. McDermott has spoken with the environmental quality board and reviewed their rules. The finding was that a mandatory EAW is not required for residential development unless 250 unattached units are proposed. In this case, there are only 5 or 6 units proposed. Councilmeraber Krebsbach said she does not believe the City of Mendota Heights had 250 unattached units for a project and was required to submit the EAW. City Attorney Tami Dielun said there are several ways an environmental review can be initiated. The State laws and rules have certain thresholds that when met, require mandatory EAW. Any citizen, or citizen group, can also petition the EQB (Environmental Quality Board) and request an EAW be performed if they think that there is the potential for a significant environmental impact. When somebody petitions the EQB, the EQB refers that back to the local govenunent unit. The local government then makes a decision as to whether or not any EAW is necessary or called for. As the local government unit, the City Council has the responsibility to move forward with the EAW if the petition has outlined the potential for significant environmental affect. Councilmember Krebsbach said there was a lot of resident interest in the development from the people that lived along the bluff line, and does not believe that at any point, the City Council was advised to decide if an EAW would need a petition. Ms. Diehm said she believes the City Council decided that they would sent a letter requesting that the City of Mendota conduct an environmental review because the City of Mendota could have decided on their own, that September 5, 2006 Page 14 due to responses they have heard, without a formal petition, they could have decided to undertake an environmental review. Ms. Diehin said she recalls that the view of the City Council at that time was that the City Council wanted to send that message, as a neighboring city; you have invited them to undertake the enviromnental review process. Ms. Diehrn said she recalls that the City Council decided that they did not want to initiate a petition, but send a letter as a neighboring governmental unit. Councihmember Krebsbach said construction has already started, so the City of Mendota would have granted a building permit without knowing that they would have the water. Ms. McDermott said that was correct. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if there was any communication between the two cities that this hookup would ultimately happen. Ms. McDermott and Mr. Danielson said they were not aware of any such connnunication. Councihmeimber Krebsbach said she doe not understand how these homes could begin construction without having the water available. Brian Miller, BDM Consulting Engineers, 4175 Lovell Road, Lexington, MN, spoke on behalf of the City of Mendota. Mr. Miller said the City of Mendota has a desire to close the loop between the east and west connections in the city, and that interest has been expressed long before any of these developments came about. The City of Mendota would like to capitalize on opportunities to extend the main either through grants or by leveraging developments. The development, as it is, could be served with private wells. There is also sanitary sewer available. Mr. Miller said the issue at hand is that the City of Mendota would like to extend their watermain, and close the loop. By closing the loop, there would be better supply for firefighting, water quality, and good circulation through the system. Mayor Huber asked how many residents would be served by this extension. Mr. Miller said the intended extension is to extend across the property that is currently owned by the developer and the City of Mendota has the opportunity for him to pay for the construction costs. Mr. Miller said the first building (a September 5, 2006 Page 15 double unit) is progressing and there are two single units in the process as well. There are three completed units. Councilmember Duggan said by having better water circulation, the quality is better for everyone and providing better services for fire services is important. Mr. Miller said it's the goal of all cities that as much as practical, water should be looped and not dead - ended. Mr. Miller said that the St. Paul Water Utilities will not be doing any financing, so the City of Mendota is looking to the developer for help. Councilmember Duggan said he supports this project for the benefit of better water pressure and thinks it's a good project. Councilmember Krebsbach asked Councilmember Golias what the chances were to obtain the water supply when the building permits were granted. Councilmember Golias said they want to continue the loop, and that's a better desire since they were able to receive water coining through the agreement with the City of Mendota Heights and we agreed to take sewage from Pilot Knob Hill and the Church of St. Peter in exchange for the water service. At the time of the agreement in 1995, St. Paul Water Utility said the goal was to continue the watermain. The City of Mendota desires to receive the water through the extension to serve the new development, but it is not necessary as they can supply water with wells. Councilmember Krebsbach commented on the resident feedback that was received concerning the height of the buildings along the bluff. Councilmember Krebsbach said this issue has become totally lost in the water issue and is concerned that the City of Mendota did not response to the request of environmental study. Councilmember Krebsbach said the development along that area is beautiful but is a real departure on how Mendota and Mendota Heights has collectively protected the bluff line, and commended the City of Mendota for preserving the connnunity as they have. Councilmember Vitelli asked why the City of Mendota did not respond to the EAW request as this is a critical area. Councilmember Golias said they did not feel it was needed and the buildings are well over 100 -ft back from the bluffs. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED DISCUSSION OF 2007 BUDGET AND LEVY Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED September 5, 2006 Page 16 Councilmember Duggan suggested that there be a workshop held with the City of Mendota Heights, the City of Mendota, and the City of Lilydale to discuss future development of Highway 13. Councilmember Schneeman said there needs to be better communication. Councilmember Duggan moved to approve the watermain extension for the City of Mendota as proposed. Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. Ms. Schabacker presented the 2007 Preliminary Budget, Preliminary Levy and the Special Taxing District. Councilmember Vitelli moved adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLUTION NO. 06-82: "RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2007 PROPOSED BUDGET"; RESOLUTION NO. 06-83: "RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE 2006 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2007"; AND RESOLUTION 06-84: "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL 2006 TAX LEVY FOR SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTIBLE IN 2007". Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Vitelli said he would like to get the process moving along on the Infill Study and the night parking in the city. Councilmember Schneeman welcomed Jake Sedlacek to the city. Mayor Huber said he will send any continents received regarding parking to Ms. McDermott. Councilmember Krebsbach said there have not been enough votes received by the Parking Committee to make a final decision, and if there is not support for any changes regarding the lot sizes, the City needs to let the residents go forward with their plans. September 5, 2006 Page 17 ADJOURN There being no further business to come before Council, Councilinernber Duggan moved to adjourn. Councilmernber Vitelli seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MOTION CARRIED TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:10 p.m. vc Rebecofi&affer Recording Secretary ATTEST: Z12r ?