Loading...
05 26 2026 CC Work Session MinutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the City Council Work Session Tuesday, May 26, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Mazzitello Maczko, and Paper were in attendance. Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Parks & Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, Police Chief Kelly McCarthy, Police Captain Wayne Wegener, POC member Jack Vitelli, POC member Mary Tollefson; ICS Representatives Kristen Duerr, Kyle Walter, and Chris Ziemer, BKV Representatives Michael Healy, Angela Ford, and Trace Jacques MUNICIPAL CAMPUS PROJECT —SCHEMATIC DESIGN PLAN REVIEW AND DISCUSSION City Administrator Jacobson began with a review of the project development timeline and the progression of the project to the schematic design phase. Members of the design team were introduced. Kyle Walter reviewed key themes and feedback from the recent community open house, including comments submitted online. Overall, the feedback received reflected continued interest in transparency, public engagement, and shared community ownership of the project. Common feedback themes focused on cost sensitivity and interest in detailed cost analysis, questions regarding conceptual building designs and project scope, sustainability considerations including LEED and B3 requirements, accommodating future growth and long-term operational needs, community space and user experience, preservation and placement of the baseball field, and building functionality, circulation and wayfinding. Councilor Mazzitello noted that online comments appeared to differ or were generally opposite of comments received from in -person respondents. Councilor Maczko observed that the number of responses received may not fully represent the broader community and suggested listing all public questions received in addition to those included in the FAQs. Mayor Levine discussed the challenges associated with measuring community feedback and emphasized the importance of considering comments within the context of the entire community. Councilor Lorberbaum emphasized the importance of continued communication and outreach regarding the project and noted the level of community engagement associated with the baseball field and athletic activities. Discussion occurred regarding the project naming and messaging. Councilor Maczko questioned whether the term "Municipal Campus Project" clearly communicates the project scope to residents. Alternative project names discussed included references to a new city hall and police department building. An audience member suggested "CityHall/Police Department New Building" as a project name. Discussion occurred regarding preservation and relocation of the baseball field. Councilor Mazzitello stated that it was always his understanding that the field would be replaced and not permanently eliminated. Councilor Lorberbaum noted that any relocation or replacement costs associated with the field should be included in the total project costs. Discussion also occurred regarding coordination with the Two Rivers Athletic Association and the importance of maintaining field availability during construction. Kyle Walter and the design team reviewed the schematic design plans, including building programming, site planning, parking, and conceptual building placement options. It was noted that the space programming had already been reduced from earlier planning concepts. Discussion occurred regarding the three potential site configurations and associated parking layouts. The project team provided cost estimates for temporary relocation of the city hall and police department should the council decide to locate the new facility where the existing building is. Estimated temporary relocation costs ranging from approximately $1.4 to $1.7 million were discussed. Kyle Walter noted that relocation of the baseball field could potentially reduce certain temporary relocation costs through construction efficiencies and coordinated excavation and site work. Parking counts and site circulation were reviewed. Discussion occurred regarding parking requirements, potential variances, overflow parking and site circulation impacts. May 26, 2026, City Council Work Session Minu[es Page - 2 Mayor Levine noted that currently overflow parking occurs on Victoria Curve. Councilor Maczko stated that the parking lot is seldom completely full. Discussion occurred regarding the need for soil boring within the baseball field and when that would occur. The design team indicated that soil borings had not been completed within the baseball field area in order to avoid unnecessary costs prior to receiving additional council direction. The purpose of soil borings and site investigations was reviewed, including the evaluation of groundwater levels, soil corrections and structural suitability. Discussion also occurred regarding required setbacks, building orientation, garage access, parking layout, and emergency egress requirements for the police department. A discussion regarding Police Department operations, security requirements, sally port access, secure circulation and emergency egress needs was had. The council discussed police operations, security requirements, sally port access, secure circulation, department access and exist points and operational considerations associated with emergency response and officer and employee safety. The design team reviewed the lower -level and first floor layouts, including community meeting spaces, training rooms, public receptions areas and shared city hall and police department functions. It was noted that the lower level is a smaller footprint than the upper level. Discussion was had regarding the use of community spaces for election administration and public meetings, as well as the flexibility of the shared use areas. Project Oversight Committee member Vitelli confirmed with Chief McCarthy and City Administrator Jacobson that the schematic design presented was supported by them and staff. Chief McCarthy and City Administrator Jacobson confirmed support. Discussion occurred regarding the proposed location and operational relationship of the Criminal Justice Network (CJN) space within the facility, including public accessibility, operational flexibility, and potential future reuse of the space. Councilor Lorberbaum confirmed that the receipt of state bond funds comes with the inclusion of CJN. Staff confirmed that CJN provided the regionality that was an important consideration in the granting of state funds. Kyle Walter provided an overview of B3 requirements and sustainability standards associated with the acceptance of state funds. Additional costs associated with B3 compliance and sustainable design requirements were discussed. ICS estimates that additional costs associated with these requirements range from approximately $3.2 to $3.6 million. The project timeline and future approval process were reviewed. Kyle Walter explained that schematic design approval would establish the genera] site location and project direction but May 26, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3 would not constitute fmal approval of construction. Future city council approvals including design development and construction document phases were described. Councilor Mazzitello noted that approving schematic design does not lock the city into construction but allows the project to continue being evaluated and refined. Discussion occurred regarding the timing of soil borings, project schedule, and potential impacts associated with delaying project decisions. Councilor Maczko expressed concern regarding the pace of the process and how fast the project was moving and questioned whether additional alternatives had been fully explored and documented. Councilor Lorberbaum asked if the June 2 SD plan approval will include approval of the acceptance of the $4 million in state bonding funds. Kyle Walter responded that B3 is not included in the SD plan approval. Councilor Mazzitello added that it would approve schematic design and that there is still time to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of $4 million. Project Oversight Committee member Tollefson stated that the information is out there for people to learn about the project. She agreed with the consideration to rename the project and encouraged the city council to keep moving forward. Council provided direction to the project team to bring the schematic design approval to the June 2 city council meeting. \baI�I11: ►I►�� \I�I�Y� Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 6:27 p.m. j Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: ancy B er, City Clerk May 26, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Page- 4