Loading...
04 07 2026 CC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 7, 2026 at 6:00 PM Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Approval of the Agenda The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline. 5.Public Comments - for items not on the agenda Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up. 6.Consent Agenda Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item, the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business. a.Approve Minutes from the March 17, 2026, City Council Work Session Meeting b.Approve Minutes from the March 17, 2026, City Council Meeting c.Approve Minutes from the March 17, 2026, City Council Closed Session Meeting d.Acknowledge Minutes from the January 27, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting e.Acknowledge Minutes from the February 24, 2026, Planning Commission Work Session Meeting f.Authorize the Purchase of Fire Department Turn-Out Gear g.Approve a Massage Therapist License Page 1 of 124 h.Approve Engineering/Public Works Department Out of Metro Travel Request i.Approve Police Department Out of Metro Travel Request j.Approve Resolution 2026-23 Proclaiming April 24, 2026, Arbor Day in Mendota Heights k.Approve 2025 Audit Fund Consolidation l.Approve Office Support Assistant Hire m.Approve Claims List 7.Presentations 8.Public Hearings 9.New and Unfinished Business a.Resolution 2026-22 Approving the Lexington Heights Planned Unit Development Amendment - Final Development Plan; And Ordinance No. 606 Approving a Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District (Planning Case Nos. 2025- 16 and 2026-03) b.Resolution 2026-25 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for 655 Callahan Place [Planning Case No. 2026-04] c.Municipal Campus Project Update 10.Community / City Administrator Announcements 11.City Council Comments 12.Adjourn Next Meeting April 21, 2026 at 6:00PM Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals with disabilities upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov. Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on NDC4/Town Square Television Cable Channel 18/HD798 and online at townsquare.tv/Mendota-Heights-Streaming Page 2 of 124 March 17, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session Tuesday, March 17, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 5:02 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Mazzitello and Paper were in attendance. Councilor Maczko was absent. Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Parks & Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, Community Development Manager Sarah Madden, Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie, Administrative/Special Projects Coordinator Noel Mills Ford, City Attorney Amy Schmidt, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer. Also in attendance from LOGIS were Patty Hartwig, Client Services Group Supervisor, and Mike McCauley, IT Security Operations Manager. CITIES FOR SAFE AND STABLE COMMUNITIES COALITION City Administrator Jacobson stated that the Cities for Safe and Stable Communities Coalition established during Operation Metro Surge has shifted to operating more as a legislative advocacy organization since the draw down of federal agents. Staff will continue to monitor the coalition and track related bills in the legislature. Mayor Levine stated she is connected with other Mayors, and they are discussing the coalition as it is evolving. After a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Council not to join the Cities for Safe and Stable Communities Coalition at this time. CYBERSECURITY SERVICES – LOGIS SECURITY AS ASERVICE OFFERINGS Patty Hartwig, Client Services Group Supervisor, and Mike McCauley IT Security Operations Manager, from LOGIS introduced themselves. Page 3 of 124 6.a March 17, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2 Assistant City Administrator Torkelson reported that cybersecurity is a growing concern, and claims are on the rise. In response, LOGIS has developed new cybersecurity services which were outlined by staff and LOGIS representatives. One option presented was Security as a Service, a reactive incident response program. This service would provide access to cybersecurity experts at LOGIS, assist in responding to cybersecurity incidents and help reduce the overall impact of incidents. The program includes specialized software designed to detect potential cyberattacks or data breaches. The annual cost for this service is $48,500 and would be in addition to the technical services that are already being provided by LOGIS. The second option presented was Vulnerability Management, a proactive service focused on incident prevention. This program includes software and staffing to scan the City’s system for vulnerabilities. The annual cost for this service is $24,750 to $32,750. Staff noted that the Council will need to consider whether to continue with current practices, contract for additional LOGIS services, or explore hiring an in-house IT employee. This conversation will lead into the 2027 budget discussions. P. Hartwig, LOGIS Client Services Group Supervisor, stated that the proposed services would add another defensive layer to reduce risk, but noted that no system can provide absolute guarantees. M. McCauley, LOGIS IT Security Operations Manager, explained that the Vulnerability Management service is a reactive service and capable of detecting a breach or cyberattack in real time. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson clarified that the $24,750 to $32,750 reflects LOGIS staff working one to two hours per week to address identified vulnerabilities. The costs of adding LOGIS services versus hiring a new IT employee were discussed. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson emphasized that without the services offered by LOGIS a cyberattack could be devastating and costly. In such a scenario, the City would also need to secure emergency contract services to assist with the City’s response. LOGIS services would provide faster response capability, specialized expertise, and established systems. Councilor Mazzitello inquired about the City’s insurance coverage. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson noted that the city is insured through the League of Minnesota Cities. Councilor Paper inquired about the amount of insurance coverage. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson replied that the current coverage provides $500,000 of coverage which is an enhanced insurance coverage amount. Page 4 of 124 March 17, 2026, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3 It was the consensus of the Council to continue with the current LOGIS service model while pursuing both new service offerings. STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Administrative/Special Projects Coordinator Mills Ford reported that the Minnesota Legislature is in the second year of the 2025-2026 biennium. She noted that there have been approximately 4,400 bills introduced into the House and 4,500 bills introduced into the Senate. It is a short session, and the legislature is nearly halfway through the 12-week session. Priority bills include gun violence & prevention, immigration/civil/human rights, fraud and affordability. City Administrator Jacobson noted that included in the work session packet was the proposed bill and the House summary for the Starter Homes Act (HF3895/SF4123). The League of Minnesota Cities negotiated concessions for some parts of the bill. The proposed bill would apply to the city. The bill has strong bipartisan support, and if enacted, would take effect on January 1, 2028. Staff will continue to monitor the bill’s progress. Administrative/Special Projects Coordinator Mills Ford noted the other bills of City interest including Property Tax Task Force (HF 3657/SF4262), and Sales Tax Exemption on Construction Materials (HF 1248/SF 1724). City Administrator Jacobson noted that Representative Angie Craig’s office had contacted staff regarding available Federal funding and applying for the municipal campus project. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Mazzitello made a motion to adjourn the work session, and the motion was seconded by Mayor Levine. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 5:52 p.m. _________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 5 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, March 17, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Paper, and Mazzitello were also present. Councilor Maczko was absent. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS No one from the public wished to be heard. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilor Lorberbaum moved approval of the consent agenda as presented, pulling item i. a.Approval of March 3, 2026, City Council Minutes b.Acknowledge Minutes from the November 12, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting c.Acknowledge Minutes from the February 10, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission Work Session d.Approve the 2026-2027 Labor Contract with International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Representing the Facility Manager e.Approve Resolution 2026-20 Formally Accepting a Monetary Donation for the Purchase of Picnic Tables f.Approve Garage Apron Replacement at Public Works Facility g.Approve Purchase of a Truck-Mounted Digital Sign Board Page 6 of 124 6.b March 17, 2026 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 4 h.Approve Resolution 2026-19 Sibley Memorial Highway Turnback i.Approve Purchase Order for a Bioxide Solution Demonstration j.Approve Monday Software Licensing Purchase k.Approve the 2026 Street Sweeping Contract l.Approval of Claims List Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS I) APPROVE PURCHASE ORDER FOR A BIOXIDE SOLUTION DEMONSTRATION Councilor Lorberbaum asked staff to provide additional information, recognizing that this has been a concern in the Friendly Hills neighborhood. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that throughout the years, staff have been aware of sewer odor concerns in the Friendly Hills neighborhood. Completed improvements in that neighborhood rehabilitated the significantly corroded pipe and staff continued to hear about odor concerns from residents. In a work session meeting, staff and the Council discussed installing an odor control unit. After that meeting and more discussion with the Metropolitan Council, staff decided to try another solution to treat the source of the odor. He then provided a brief overview of the bioxide solution 60-day trial. He stated that staff are confident that this will extend to a permanent solution. This trial will also address the issue without making the capital investment of putting in an odor control unit. It would take eight to 10 weeks to implement and could be a fairly quick solution. Councilor Lorberbaum moved to approve PURCHASE ORDER FOR A BIOXIDE SOLUTION DEMONSTRATION. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 PRESENTATIONS No items scheduled. PUBLIC HEARING No items scheduled. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A) RESOLUTION 2026-21 TO APPROVE PLANS AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE HAMPSHIRE ESTATES STREET IMPROVEMENTS Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie explained that the Council was being asked to approve Resolution 2026-21, approving the Final Plans and Specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the Page 7 of 124 March 17, 2026 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 4 Hampshire Estates Street Improvements. There was additional work added to the specifications. One of the new items is at Hagstrom King Park, which includes the construction of a concrete bleacher pad and an eight-foot-wide bituminous trail connecting the bleacher pad to the trail that will run along Mendota Heights Road. Councilor Paper asked when the project would begin. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that the contractor would be allowed time to complete the work between May and October, but the project would not take that entire length. He noted that the project could begin in May, June, or July, depending on the contractor’s schedule. Councilor Paper asked for information on the bidding climate. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that this is the first project they are bidding this year, so he had not yet seen any bids come in this year. He noted that they are bidding early in an attempt to receive better pricing. Councilor Paper asked if there would be a lot of dirt work for the concrete pad and pedway. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie provided additional information on the scope of work, noting that there is not a large amount of dirt work. Councilor Mazzitello stated that the County has opened two bids, and they have come in close, or slightly under the estimates. He noted that contractors will typically prepare their fuel prices for the year and increases in fuel costs will not be felt until the next bidding year. Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt Resolution No. 2026-21 Approving Final Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the Hampshire Estates Street Improvement Project. Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 B) MUNICIPAL CAMPUS PROJECT UPDATE Chris Ziemer, ICS, provided an update from the community kick-off event, community thought exchange survey, the Project Oversight Committee, and architect progress. It was noted that the survey questions will remain available on the website until March 22, 2026. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming community events and activities. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilor Mazzitello commended the Public Works staff for their great response to the snowstorm this last weekend. He offered a historical fact from March 17, 1776. Page 8 of 124 March 17, 2026 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 4 Councilor Lorberbaum announced the Wentworth Library in West St. Paul will reopen on May 6 and listed the improvements that were made with grant money. She announced that it would be free cone day at the West St. Paul Dairy Queen this Thursday. Councilor Paper noted that we are one day closer to spring and commented that it was still light out. Registration is now open for the Scott Patrick Memorial 5K. Mayor Levine stated that the snow was fabulous and encouraged everyone to enjoy winter’s last hurrah. ADJOURN Councilor Paper moved to adjourn. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 6:33 p.m. Stephanie B. Levine Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Nancy Bauer City Clerk Page 9 of 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the City Council Closed Session Held March 17, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Mazzitello and Paper were present. Councilor Maczko was absent. Also in attendance were City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Attorney Jared Shepherd, Attorney Amy Schmidt, Attorney Jason Kuboushek, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, and Community Development Manager Sarah Madden. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE MATTERS A motion was made by Councilor Lorberbaum, seconded by Councilor Mazzitello, to adjourn to a closed session pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, Subdivision 3(b) to receive confidential legal advice from the City’s legal counsel regarding the City’s legal rights and authority, regarding City of Mendota Heights v. Stephen Dick and Roy Dick, Dakota County Court File No. 19HA-CV-26-1605. The motion passed 4-0. ADJOURN A motion was made by Councilor Mazzitello, seconded by Councilor Paper, to adjourn the closed meeting at 4:56 p.m. The motion passed 4-0. _________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 10 of 124 6.c This page is intentionally left blank January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 27, 2026 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, January 27, 2026, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Commissioners Cindy Johnson, Brian Udell, Jeff Nath, and Steve Goldade. Those absent: Commissioners Patrick Corbett and Jason Stone. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as submitted. Approval of December 29, 2025, Minutes COMMISSIONER NATH MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GOLDADE, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 29, 2025. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Hearings A)PLANNING CASE 2026-01 HOMES BY TADITION, LLC, NORTHWEST CORNER OF GLEHNHILL ROAD AND VICTORIA CURVE – MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Homes by Tradition is the applicant and owner’s representative of the vacant property at the northwest corner of Glenhill Road and Victoria Curve (PID #27-81251-00-013) and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single-family home, with associated site work and improvements. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Page 11 of 124 6.d January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 6 Commissioner Johnson provided background information on keystone species and asked staff for more information on the Forest Alteration Permit and that process. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that the Forest Alteration Permit is required when tree removal thresholds are triggered. She explained how that is reviewed by staff and what is required to be shown on the plan. She stated that there are selective trees to be removed in the bluff impact zone (BIZ), which are dead or diseased, along with those planned for removal within the building pad. Commissioner Johnson noted that there are additional steps identified within the ordinance for the protection of trees during construction. She asked for clarification on a discrepancy for tags 52 and 60 and whether those would be removed or retained. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Dean Nelson, Homes by Tradition, commented that they are building a beautifully designed home in a beautiful neighborhood. He stated that they carefully place the home on the property and consider which trees will be removed or protected. He recognized the work that must still be done to move or remove the pool. He noted that he would review and update the information related to trees 52 and 60. Chair Field asked if the applicant agrees to condition two related to the pool. Mr. Nelson confirmed that they will adjust the placement of the pool and resubmit. Alan Olstein, 1954 Glenhill Road, stated that he was involved in a previous discussion for the development of this site back in 2020. He submitted a hydrogeological investigation of this area related to the buildability and stability of the slope. He noted that the pool is proposed very close, or within the BIZ. He asked that the City be the most conservative when judging the safety of this proposed project with regard to the potential of failure and landslides. He did not believe that some of the issues identified in the hydrogeological investigation had been addressed. He provided a copy of the investigation report to staff. Commissioner Goldade stated that he was a member of the Park and Recreation Commission during that previous review. He recognized the concern from those below the bluff and asked about the concern of the resident across the street. Mr. Olstein stated that a catastrophic failure of this site could impact infrastructure and utilities and have a broader impact on the community. Stephen Golias, 1308 4th Street in Mendota, thanked the previous speaker for his comments. He stated that he had grave concerns with the plan proposed in 2020 and is excited for this new plan, although he still has similar concerns, as he is downhill from the project. He referenced the proposed holding pond for the property and asked how that would be engineered. He asked if all impervious drainage would go into that pond, the storm level to which the pond would be designed, Page 12 of 124 January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 6 and how water would percolate out. He also asked how the sewage would be handled. He referenced the retaining walls and hoped that they would be built with a lifespan longer than 40 years. Lynn Burow, 1219 Victoria Curve, commented on the trees that will be lost through this proposal and asked for clarification if the trees within the right-of-way would be preserved. She also had concerns with the drainage plan and impacts that could result from rainfall with the reduced vegetation on the property. Mr. Nelson stated that he shared the concerns of the first resident. He commented that he and his clients are working with Braun Intertec who completed a study on the proposed footings, foundation, and retaining wall. He stated that because Braun was involved in that original study, they are comfortable with the finding that the construction is feasible and there would not be any issues with drainage or slope with the proper retaining walls. He confirmed that all impervious areas would drain to the infiltration basin, which would drain out over time. He stated that the BIZ would be stabilized before, during, and beyond construction. He commented that they would connect to the main sewer lines. Commissioner Udell asked and received confirmation that Braun is involved to verify the data to ensure the proposal is consistent with their findings in 2020. James Grahams, Lake and Land Surveying, commented that the holding pond is more of a rain garden, which would hold the one-inch storm and drain within 48 hours. Kathy McGuire, 1942 Glenhill Road, commented that she has concerns with the environment and maintaining the MRCC area. She recalled conflicts in 2020 between the University of Minnesota comments and Braun comments, and asked that the City review both reports, as she believed that the hydrology of the whole area was discussed rather than just the bluff. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER GOLDADE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER UDELL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Johnson asked if staff has recollection of that hydrology report. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the development proposed in 2020 was more dense. He was not aware of any restrictions placed on the lot split completed in 2023. He stated that the two lots that were created just needed to meet the MRCCA requirements, and he believed that this request was compliant with the MRCCA requirements. He stated that the drainage requirements are met by the infiltration basin proposed by the applicant. He commented that there are springs Page 13 of 124 January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 6 located along the bluff throughout the state. He believed that those are more within the BIZ. He stated that there are no publicly mapped springs in this area. Commissioner Goldade asked if anything had been learned from the bluff failures in other areas of the community. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that there were a couple of failures on Highway 13, but that would not be apples to apples comparisons. He noted that the applicant is doing their due diligence to prevent failures. He stated that existing homes on the Culligan cul-de-sac would have a higher impact on the bluff than the home being proposed tonight. Chair Field recalled that there were failures from the roadway, which impacted the bluff before the failure occurred on 13. Commissioner Johnson commented that this does not seem to be the same type of slope. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the new MRCCA ordinance includes slopes that are not steep within the BIZ, confirming that this is not a steep slope area. Commissioner Goldade asked for more information on the lifespan of the retaining wall. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that he did not recall that discussion of the past. He noted that this would be a boulder retaining wall and was unsure if there was a specific life for a boulder wall, as boulders are naturally occurring. He noted that the retaining wall is related to the pool and urged the Commission not to focus on that detail, as that will be removed or moved. Commissioner Goldade asked if staff reviewed the report provided by the resident tonight prior to the meeting. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that an updated Braun memo was included in the packet, which referenced their work in the previous application and had been updated for the one home. She confirmed that she did review the previous application from 2020 in advance of this application and meeting as well. She also provided additional information on the 2023 lot split approval, which created the two lots and buildable areas. Commissioner Udell recognized that the proposed density of development was different in 2020 and asked for more information on the hydrological report. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the 2020 development included roads, utilities, large retaining walls, ponds, more homes, and homes closer to the bluff. He stated that the neighbors privately contracted to have that report done. The Council considered all information and denied the 2020 proposal, but then was comfortable approving the lot split that was completed in 2023. COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MRCCA-CRITICAL AREA PERMIT REQUEST BY Page 14 of 124 January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 6 HOMES BY TRADITION FOR A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON THE VACANT PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GLENHILL ROAD AND VICTORIA CURVE (PID #27-81251-00-013), WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.A BUILDING PERMIT, INCLUDING A GRADING PLAN, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK. 2.THE SWIMMING POOL AND SURROUNDING POOL DECKING/PATIO AREA MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE PLAN, OR RELOCATED ELSEWHERE ON THE SITE PLAN OUTSIDE THE BLUFFLINE SETBACK PRIOR TO THE CITY TAKING ACTION ON THIS APPLICATION. NO STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES, INCLUDING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BLUFFLINE SETBACK. 3.A SEPARATE FOREST ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION AND FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE APPLICANT SHALL POST A TREE REPLACEMENT ESCROW WITH THE CITY AND SHALL MITIGATE TREE REPLACEMENT IN APPROPRIATE AREAS OF THE PROPERTY AS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANAGER. IF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT IS NOT FEASIBLE, THE CITY MAY APPROVE ALTERNATIVE TREE REPLACEMENT MEASURES WITHIN THE FOREST ALTERATION PERMIT. 4.A FINAL LANDSCAPING AND RESTORATION PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPED AREA OF THE SITE MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGER AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, INCLUDING SEED MIX DETAILS, NATIVE PLANT SPECIES, AND SIZING AND DSH OF REPLACEMENT TREES. 5.IN THE BLUFF IMPACT ZONE, ALL NEW VEGETATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE RESTORATION PLAN MUST BE NATIVE AND SUITABLE FOR THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPE. 6.IN ANY AREAS WHERE BUCKTHORN WILL BE REMOVED, A BUCKTHORN REPLACEMENT GROUNDCOVER MIX MUST BE INSTALLED TO PREVENT EROSION. 7.THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDEANCE DOCUMENT. ALL PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. 8.ALL EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY GRADING AND SITE WORK ACTIVITIES AND MUST REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL PROPER SITE RESTORATION PLANS ARE COMPLETED, INCLUDING A DUAL ROW OF PERIMETER CONTROL AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE BLUFF, PERIMETER CONTROL SURROUNDING THE INFILTRATION BASIN, AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ON ANY DISTURBED SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. 9.ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. Page 15 of 124 January 27, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 6 10.ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. ON WEEKENDS. FURTHER DISCUSSION: Commissioner Johnson thanked staff for identifying the need to remove or relocate the pool. She was also pleased to see the removal of buckthorn and a requirement for replacement vegetation. She believed that the request met the MRCCA requirements. Commissioner Udell asked if any conditions should be added to clarify discrepancies in the tree inventory report. Commissioner Johnson stated that language could be added to update the removal status for tags 52 and 60. It was decided that it should be added as condition 11. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its February 4, 2026, meeting. New and Unfinished Business Staff Announcements / Updates Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided an update on City Council actions on cases reviewed by the Planning Commission. She noted an alternate date that could be considered for the March meeting. It was confirmed that the meeting would be rescheduled to March 31, 2026. She noted that the February meeting may be canceled. Adjournment COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:00 P.M. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Page 16 of 124 February 24, 2026 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Work Session Meeting Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 2026 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Planning Commission, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118. Call To Order Chair Litton Field called the meeting to order at 7:02pm. Commissioners Jason Stone, Cindy Johnson, Brian Udell, Steve Goldade, Patrick Corbett, and Jeff Nath were also present. City staff present included Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director, Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director, and Amy Schmidt, City Attorney. Discussion A)ZONING AND LAND USE TRAINING PRESENTATION Attorney Amy Schmidt introduced herself to the Planning Commission and discussed her role in providing legal services to the City of Mendota Heights. Attorney Schmidt presented the following items: the Planning Commission’s Role, Zoning, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Time Limits, Public Hearings, Public Discretion, Open Meeting Law, and Conflicts of Interest. The Commissioners discussed previous planning cases and their implications to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, state statute, city ordinances and code, and legal processes. Commissioner Schmidt answered questions pertaining to legal concerns, precedent setting, and procedures for ensuring an efficient, thorough, and legal centered review of planning cases. Commissioners noted the training was very informative and should be a standard training moving forward. B)TITLE 11: SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ORDINANCE Director Ruzek reviewed the draft Title 11: Subdivision Regulations Ordinance that has been prepared by Community Development Manager Sarah Madden. The Commission provided Director Ruzek with some minor edits to the Ordinance document and asked clarifying questions. Director Ruzek will provide the requested edits, comments, and questions to Community Development Manager Madden to incorporate into the final document. Director Ruzek noted the City Council discussed the cul-de-sac component at their work session the week prior and provided direction to staff to proceed with the 500-foot measurement. The Commission provided their appreciation to staff for the updates to the Ordinance and noted this is an improved document that will provide more clarity to staff, the commission, the city council, and the public moving forward. Adjournment The commission adjourned the meeting at 8:36pm. Page 17 of 124 6.e This page is intentionally left blank 6.f REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Authorize the Purchase of Fire Department Turn-Out Gear ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief ACTION REQUEST: Authorize the purchase of six (6) sets of firefighter turn-out gear at the quoted amount of $27,480 from Fire Equipment Specialties (FES Inc.). BACKGROUND: The 2026 Fire Department operating budget includes funding for the ongoing replacement of firefighter turn-out gear. The department’s Gear and Uniform Committee continuously evaluates the age and condition of firefighter turn-out gear, the amount of spare gear available, and plans for providing the department’s most recent rookie class with proper gear. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: This year new turnout gear will be purchased for the five new hires from 2025 and one replacement set for a current firefighter. A quote from FES Inc., who is the only local supplier of the department’s specified turn-out gear, was received in the amount of $4,580 per set. Total purchase price of $27,480 for six sets. The replacement of turn-out gear is a FY2026 budgeted expense. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 18 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.g REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Massage Therapist License ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk ACTION REQUEST: Approve a new massage therapist license. BACKGROUND: Esteban Rubio has completed all application requirements for a massage therapist license and has secured employment at the licensed massage establishment, Hush Therapeutic Massage. Additionally, he has successfully passed a background check conducted by the Mendota Heights Police Department. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 19 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.h REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Engineering/Public Works Department Out of Metro Travel Request ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUEST: Approve out-of-metro travel for the Public Works Director and Assistant City Engineer to attend the American Public Works Association (APWA) annual conference in Nisswa, Minnesota. BACKGROUND: City policy requires that the city council approve any travel to a location outside the metro area for city employees. The American Public Works Association (APWA) annual conference will be held in Nisswa, MN, from May 6–8, 2026. The conference is designed for Public Works professionals. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Attendance at this conference is a budgeted expense. Estimated lodging and conference registration is $2,107 for staff to attend. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 20 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Police Department Out of Metro Travel Request ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Police CONTACT: Kelly McCarthy, Police Chief ACTION REQUEST: Approve a request for out of metro travel for Police Officers Hogan and Hagelee on April 28, 2026. BACKGROUND: Each year, the Jewish Community Relations Council facilitates a one-day trip to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC. Officers will have the opportunity to participate and learn about the role of police in Nazi Germany and to reflect on their role in a democratic society today. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Cost of the training, including travel, is $435 per officer for a total of $870 to be paid from the police training budget. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 21 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.j REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Resolution 2026-23 Proclaiming April 24, 2026, Arbor Day in Mendota Heights ITEM TYPE: Resolution DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Manager ACTION REQUEST: The Council is asked to approve Resolution 2026-23, proclaiming April 24, 2026 Arbor Day in Mendota Heights. BACKGROUND: Arbor Day is an excellent opportunity for residents to enhance and improve the tree canopy in Mendota Heights by planting and preserving trees of diverse species. Planting trees provides several benefits to property owners including energy savings, improving air quality, combating climate change, providing pollinator and wildlife habitat, and increasing property values. Residents should practice good tree care by checking existing trees for damage and disease, as well as mulching and watering as needed. Thoughtful plans for tree planting and tree maintenance can make a significant difference in the preservation and improvement of the City’s urban forest. Mendota Heights is celebrating Arbor Day in 2026 as part of a week-long Earth and Arbor Day Celebration, Monday, April 20 through Friday, April 24. The week-long celebration includes family events and programming such as outdoor yoga, find Lily the Frog, the Wall-E movie shown at City Hall, the Free Book Buggie, a raptor show by the MN Raptor Center and free supplies for a self-led city clean-up event. Details will be provided on social media and the City’s website. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The cost of the Earth and Arbor Day event is estimated at $1,500. This includes prizes, giveaways, and programming. Costs incurred would be taken from the city’s parks and recreation programming budget, stormwater budget, as well as the City’s forestry budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Proclamation - Arbor Day 2026 Page 22 of 124 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 23 of 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, in 1872, the Nebraska Board of Agriculture established a special day to be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and WHEREAS, trees can be a solution to combat climate change by reducing the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cutting heating and cooling costs, moderating the temperature, cleaning the air, producing life-giving oxygen, and providing habitat for wildlife; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource, increase property values in our city, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that all citizens are urged to plant trees to promote the well-being of future generations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: I, Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor of the City of Mendota Heights, do hereby proclaim April 24, 2026 as ARBOR DAY in Mendota Heights and I urge all people to celebrate Arbor Day and to support efforts to protect our trees and urban forest. Stephanie B. Levine Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Bauer City Clerk Page 24 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.k REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve 2025 Audit Fund Consolidation ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director ACTION REQUEST: Approve the consolidation of debt service and capital projects funds. BACKGROUND: As part of the annual audit process, the city will close out debt service and capital project funds to the respective Consolidated Funds. The debt service funds to be closed out are for bond issues that have been paid off. The capital project funds to be closed out are for past projects that are complete and no longer have any activity. The consolidation of these funds will not change how they are accounted for with the 2025 audit. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: There is no budget impact for the consolidation of debt service and capital project funds. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 25 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 6.l REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Office Support Assistant Hire ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City Administrator ACTION REQUEST: Approve the Hiring of Becca Melcher as a Part-Time Office Support Assistant. BACKGROUND: The Office Support Assistant is a critical role in city operations. This position welcomes visitors to city hall, serves as the receptionist directing calls to the City, and supporting the city's permitting process along with a wide assortment of other administrative functions. The Office Support Assistant position is structured as a job share between two part-time staff. Following the promotion of one of the current Office Support Assistants, the City Council authorized staff to post the position. The City has completed a competitive search of candidates and enthusiastically recommends the hiring of Becca Melcher as a Part-Time Office Support Assistant for the City of Mendota Heights. Becca Melcher has a range of professional experiences that will help her succeed in the position. Staff are confident that she will be a valuable addition to the City of Mendota Heights. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: This is a budgeted position with the City of Mendota Heights. Staff recommend the City Council authorize the hiring of Becca Melcher with an hourly wage of $33.58 which is step-4 of paygrade-5 of the 2026 Non-Union Employee Compensation Matrix with one week (16.5 hours) of vacation banked to start her employment with the City of Mendota Heights. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 26 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank Page 27 of 1246.m Page 28 of 124 Page 29 of 124 Page 30 of 124 Page 31 of 124 Page 32 of 124 Page 33 of 124 Page 34 of 124 Page 35 of 124 Page 36 of 124 Page 37 of 124 Page 38 of 124 Page 39 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 9.a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2026-22 Approving the Lexington Heights Planned Unit Development Amendment - Final Development Plan; And Ordinance No. 606 Approving a Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District (Planning Case Nos. 2025-16 and 2026-03) ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2026-22 Approving a Planned Unit Development Amendment - Final Development Plan, for the Lexington Heights Planned Unit Development; and Adopt Ordinance No. 606 Approving a Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District INTRODUCTION: The approval actions requested under this application, requesting construction of a new 84- unit multifamily apartment building on the subject property are: 1.Planned Unit Development Amendment – Final Development Plan 2.Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District The duly noticed public hearing on the Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development Amendment was held at the November 25, 2025 and December 29, 2025 regular Planning Commission meetings. The City Council then voted unanimously (5-0) on January 20, 2026 to approve the Preliminary Development Plan proposed under Planning Case No. 2025-16 with certain findings-of-fact and conditions as outlined in Resolution 2026-06 (attached to this report). The next step in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) review process for this land use request is approval of the Final Development Plan, which has been assigned as Planning Case No. 2026-03. This approval step includes adoption of the ordinance formalizing the approved Zoning Amendment of the property from R-3 Multi-Family Residential to R-3/PUD Multi- Family Residential District/Planned Unit Development Overlay District. Page 40 of 124 If the City Council takes action to approve the Final Development Plan and adopt the Zoning Amendment ordinance, the final step will be the execution of a Developer’s Agreement for the PUD. The final version of this agreement would return to the City Council for adoption on the Consent Agenda of a future meeting date once both parties have agreed to the terms of this agreement. BACKGROUND: City Code Title 12: Zoning, in section 12-5B-8: Planned Unit Development outlines the procedural provisions and minimum requirements for all Planned Unit Developments. Subsection (J) of this ordinance outlines the controlling measures for a Planned Unit Development following its completion. This applies to the application request proposed and approved under Planning Case No. 2025-16, as the subject property is an existing Planned Unit Development approved by City Council Resolution 83-95 on November 1, 1983. Within 12-5B-8(J)3: Changes to Final Development Plan, the City Code requires that changes in the use of common open space within a completed PUD to be processed by an Amendment to the Final Development Plan pursuant to the same procedures for approval of a Zoning Amendment. The application request modifies green space on the subject property, which is why the City is processing this request under the same procedures for approval as a Zoning Amendment. Additionally, the City’s Planned Unit Development Ordinance requires in all new PUDs, that the full extent of the property be rezoned with a “Planned Unit Development Overlay District”. Because this site was developed as a PUD prior to this Overlay District requirement, this action on the Final Development Plan formalizes the Zoning Amendment procedural steps to correct the property’s zoning designation as within the Overlay District. The ordinance states that the adoption of the Zoning Amendment ordinance should take place simultaneously with the approval of the Final Development Plan. CHANGES IN FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Section 12-5B-8: Planned Unit Development of City Code requires that the applicant file the Final Development Plan within six (6) weeks following the approval of the Preliminary Development Plan by the City Council. The plans and materials for the Final Development Plan were received by the City on February 25, 2026 in compliance with this requirement. The City Council must review the Final Development Plan to determine that all conditions of the approval of the Preliminary Development Plan have been satisfied. If the City Council determines that the Final Development Plan is not in substantial conformity with the Preliminary Development Plan, then the request may be referred back to the Planning Commission to restart the review process, including holding an additional public hearing on the changes. Staff does find that the provided plans are in substantial conformity with the approvals under the Preliminary Development Plan. Conditions of Approval – Preliminary Development Plan 1.The Applicant/Developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Page 41 of 124 Mendota Heights. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan. A Development Agreement for the PUD will be required, and if this request is approved by the City Council, the Development Agreement will be brought back to the City Council at a future meeting date. 2.The new building shall be constructed only in conformance to building and site plans certified by registered architects and engineers (as applicable); and in accordance with all architectural and building standards found under Title 12-4B-3, Subpart E “Architecture and Building Design Standards” Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and is a requirement of the Base Zoning District (R-3). 3.The proposed water system shall be designed and constructed to Saint Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS) standards, including written approval of the design layout prior to final City Council approval. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and will be satisfied prior to the City Council’s approval and authorization to execute the Development Agreement. 4.The Developer/Applicant shall submit final grading, utility, and site plans, and architectural construction drawings for permitting, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. Building and grading permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction commencement of any work. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and will be satisfied with the submittal of a building permit for this development. 5.All grading and construction activities as part of the proposed development shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes, as well as in compliance with the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and is a base requirement for all developments within the City. 6.The Final Development Plan shall include an updated landscape plan with a detailed landscaping schedule for planned plant materials. Staff Comments: The applicant has submitted new landscape plans with the Final Development Plan that are compliant with this condition. There is one staff comment that the Japanese Tree Lilac is no longer recommended for planting due to invasive characteristics. There are four (4) trees of this type listed on the plant schedule. Staff would recommend that these proposed trees be replaced with a different ornamental tree type. 7.The Applicant/Developer will work with Planning staff to review and approve additional plant materials within a buffer area between the proposed patio courtyard and the reduced setback area from the east property line boundary with I-35E, along the north property line which is shared with the R-1 zoned property, and in the area of construction of the retaining wall and fire turnaround adjacent to the parking garage entrance, by installing additional landscape materials including berms, hedges, or other landscape materials where feasible. Staff Comments: The applicant has submitted new landscape plans with the Final Page 42 of 124 Development Plan. The plans are robust compared to the preliminary landscape plan previously reviewed. The applicant has included perimeter plantings at the east property line shared with the Interstate 35-E right-of-way, as well as at the north property line shared with a single-family home. The east perimeter plantings include primarily evergreen buffer trees, including columnar arborvitae, Eastern Red Cedar, Black Hills Spruce, and Balsam Fir. In the line of perimeter trees, there are also two Common Hackberry trees shown, a deciduous overstory tree. In addition to the property perimeter line of screening trees, the applicant has illustrated three columnar deciduous trees adjacent to the rear patio area, and foundation plantings of perennial shrubs. The north perimeter plantings at the shared property line with the single family home include eight columnar evergreen trees extending inward from the front property line at Lexington Avenue, as well as six columnar Swedish Aspen, five arborvitae, and lastly four Balsam Fir at the point aligning with the exit of vehicles from the shared surface parking area between the existing and proposed buildings. The underground parking garage entrance has been relocated as part of the Final Development Plan, so there is no need for the portion of the condition applying to the retaining wall and the previously potential turnaround area. This site plan change is discussed in the “Other Site Plan Revisions” section later in this report. 8.A performance bond or letter of credit shall be supplied by the applicant in an amount equal to at least one and one-half (1 1/2) times the value of such screening, landscaping, or other improvements, to be included as part of the Development Agreement. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, will be regulated in the Development Agreement, and is a base requirement for all new developments within the City. 9.The Developer and/or their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan and which have died shall be replaced as soon as seasonal or weather conditions allow. All landscape areas must be irrigated. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and will be outlined in the Development Agreement. 10.The Applicant/Developer will work with the fire department personnel in determining final design, location and specifications to the fire safety access area to the north portion of the new building. Staff Comments: The underground parking garage entrance has been relocated as part of the Final Development Plan, and this condition as written no longer applies. This change has been reviewed by the City’s Fire Marshal and is discussed in the “Other Site Plan Revisions” section later in this report. 11.A separate Forest Alteration Permit application and Forest Management Plan is required to be submitted to the City prior to building permit issuance to confirm compliance with Page 43 of 124 the Urban Forest Preservation Ordinance. The applicant shall post a tree replacement escrow with the City and shall mitigate tree replacement in appropriate areas of the property as reviewed and approved by the Natural Resources Manager and Community Development Manager. If compliance with the tree replacement requirement is not feasible, the City may approve alternative tree replacement measures within the Forest Alteration Permit. Staff Comments: This condition will remain for the Final Development Plan, and is a base requirement for all developments within the City. 12.The Applicant/Developer shall provide additional architectural design details to better integrate and coordinate with existing buildings. Staff Comments: The applicant has submitted updated exterior elevations with the Final Development Plan. The revisions include updated building materials, a modified entry/lobby exterior design, and the addition of roof parapet details and colors to more closely complement the existing buildings. A significant change includes a modification to the 4th floor siding of an architectural metal vertical panel to provide visual similarities to the “mansard” roof style of the existing buildings within the development (illustrated below). Other Site Plan Revisions The surface parking lot changes as a result of this new building were a point of discussion within the Preliminary Development Plan approval. Comments were brought forward from both the members of the public at the Public Hearing, and from the Planning Commissioners and City Councilors when reviewing the application request. Previously, the site plan included using the existing singular entrance to the parking lot from Lexington Avenue, with a curved entrance into the underground parking garage from the north end of the proposed building (shown below). Page 44 of 124 The civil site plan included an outlined area for a potential fire turnaround point arching off from the garage entrance, however comments were received from residents within the existing building that this would not be available for their use, or for the use of a moving truck or delivery truck that may need to access the property and have no location for a safe turnaround. There were also comments of concern with the retaining wall adjacent to the garage entrance and its proximity to the tree canopy of the small wooded area at the northeast corner of the subject property. To resolve that issue, the applicant has eliminated the parking lot dead-end and replaced it with a connection to the existing west driveway entrance into the existing building’s underground parking (shown below). The applicant has indicated that the resulting design simplifies vehicle circulation. The City’s Fire Marshal has reviewed the proposed plan and has no issues with the alignment. Previously, when this application was submitted for a Concept Plan in the early stages of the PUD Amendment request, the plan included a shared drive aisle connection using that existing underground garage entrance at the north end of the property. This was commented on by the Planning Commission and City Council as something that should be modified to not impact the adjacent property owner to the north with an increase in headlights from vehicles, and so that less green space would be disturbed. This was taken into account when designing the Preliminary Development Plan. In light of the comments received about parking lot circulation, this alignment has been reinstated in the Final Development Plan. However, the original concerns related to headlight screening have been addressed through the placement of perimeter landscaping at the shared north property line, in compliance with Condition #7 in the Preliminary Development Plan approval. The revised site plan alignment of the drive aisle does not have an impact on required maximum impervious surface within the Planned Unit Development – the development site is still compliant with that aspect of City Code. Also related to the drive aisle and parking lot alignment, the applicant has shifted the garage entrance from the north end of the building to the south corner. The garage entry would be directly in line with the existing parking lot drive aisle at the southern end of the property (shown below). Page 45 of 124 This alignment removes the need for the retaining wall surrounding a north garage entrance, which eliminates concerns with excavation in proximity to the northeast property corner trees. Staff does not have concerns with this adjustment to the site plan, and finds it to be substantially conforming with the Preliminary Development Plan, the intent of the conditions relating to turnaround access, and the stated concerns of landscaping adjacent to the previously illustrated retaining wall. The applicant has also included updates to the site plan concerning additional exterior improvements that can be completed in tandem with the new apartment building development. Specifically, the property owner and applicant have included improvements to recreation amenities to appeal to the majority of their residents. These include a renovation of the existing basketball court into two pickleball courts, replacement of the existing grilling pad area with two new concrete patio pads with pergola and community table grilling. Lastly, the applicant has heard feedback from residents on desirable upgrades and would expand the swimming pool concrete patio to allow for existing seating space in the warmer months. The applicant has included these amenity improvements as a response to the previous meeting's discussion on recreational amenities for residents of the entire development, as opposed to just the new proposed building. The applicant would work with the City to incorporate these upgrades into the Development Agreement for the PUD and make the improvements at the same time as building construction. These improvements are illustrated on the civil site plan attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is asked to discuss the Final Development Plan as proposed, and make two separate motions to first Adopt Resolution 2026-22, Approving the Final Development Plan, and then Adopt Ordinance No. 606, Approving the Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District. The City Council also may direct staff and the applicant to return at a future meeting date with revisions to the Final Development Plan and [draft] Resolution as determined through the Council's discussion on the proposal. The current statutory review deadline for this Final Page 46 of 124 Development Plan application request is April 26, 2026. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Res. No. 2026-22 Approving a Final Development Plan - Amendment to the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development for the Property Located at 2300 Lexington Avenue [Planning Case No. 2026-03] 2.Ordinance No. 606 An Ordinance Amending the Lexington Heights Planned UnitDevelopment, and a Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit Development Overlay District 3.Site Location Map 4.Excerpt - Minutes of the January 20, 2026 City Council Meeting 5.Resolution 2026-06 Approving Zoning Amendment & Prelim Dev Plan - January 20, 2026 6.Applicant Letter - Final PUD Submission, dated 2/25/26 7.Plan Revisions Memo, dated 4/2/26 8.Civil Plans - Lexington Heights Apartments - Final PUD, dated 4/2/26 9.Landscape Plans - Lexington Heights Apartments - Final PUD, dated 4/2/26 10. Architectural Plans - Lexington Heights Apartments - Final PUD, dated 2/25/26 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy Page 47 of 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-22 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - AMENDMENT TO THE 1983 LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2300 LEXINGTON AVENUE [PLANNING CASE NO. 2026-03] WHEREAS Chase Real Estate (or “Applicant” or “Developer”) in cooperation with Riley Family Lexington Heights Limited Partnership (Condor Living / Lexington Heights Apartments and as “Owner”) has applied for a Planned Unit Development - Final Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development (PUD), as proposed under Planning Case 2026-03 (84-Unit Apartment Building) (“Project”) for the property located at 2300 Lexington Avenue and legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Final Development Plan to amend the PUD as presented herein would authorize the construction of a new four-story multi-family apartment building containing 84-units and associated resident amenities and exterior site improvements including a fitness area, patio space, common lounge space, new landscaping, and stormwater management improvements; and WHEREAS, the subject property is guided HDR-High Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and is situated in the R-3 Multi-Family Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 1983, the City Council approved the Planned Unit Development for Lexington Heights Apartments, as well as a Variance from the density requirement to construct 225 units on an 18.2 acre site; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1984, the City Council approved the Final Plat for LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION, which dedicated additional right-of-way and reduced the size of the property to 16.3 acres; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission opened, held, and closed a public hearing on the Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan application request under Planning Case No. 2025-16 at their regular meeting, and whereupon receiving the presented staff report and hearing testimony from three (3) residents on the application, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to table the requested application to December 29, 2025; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2025, The Mendota Heights Planning Commission opened, held, and closed the second public hearing on the Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan application request under Planning Case No. 2025-16, and the tabled application was presented by staff with follow-up on discussion items from the prior meeting, and following discussion on this item a motion was made and seconded to deny the application which Page 48 of 124 Res. No. 2026-22 Page 2 of 5 failed by a 2-4 vote. A second motion to approve the application with findings-of-fact and conditions was made which resulted in a tied vote 3-3 and through discussion the Planning Commission determined that this tied vote would be sent to the City Council for their discussion and review of the application, including Planning Commission review comments; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2026, the Mendota Heights City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-06 Approving a Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan for an Amendment to the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development for the property located at 2300 Lexington Avenue as presented under Planning Case No. 2025-16. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the Planned Unit Development - Final Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development as proposed under Planning Case 2026-03, is hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1.The Applicant/Developer has submitted the Final Development Plan to the City within six weeks of the City Council’s approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. 2.The proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment – Final Development Plan is substantially in conformance with the Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan as approved under Resolution No. 2026-06. 3.The proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment – Final Development Plan, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable City Code requirements for such a planned development in the R-3 Multi Family Residential Base Zoning District and HR – High Density Residential Land Use area. 4.The deviations of the Planned Unit Development Amendment include: a.To allow an increase in density to 18.9 units per acre on the 16.31 acre site b.To allow a reduced principal building setback from the east lot line of 25.2-ft 5.The proposed project utilizes the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning flexibility to enhance development of the property without negatively impacting surrounding land uses and natural resources. 6.The reduced setback at the east property line for the principal building does not pose any threat to the general health, safety and welfare of the surrounding properties or diminishes the usefulness of the planned development of this property. 7.The increase in residential net density to 18.9 units per acre will be an effective and unified treatment of the existing Planned Unit Development; will provide additional housing unit types that are in-demand within the community; and can be developed to harmonize with existing development in the areas surrounding the project site and within the City as a whole. Page 49 of 124 Res. No. 2026-22 Page 3 of 5 8.Construction of the proposed 84-unit multi-family residential building will contribute to a significant amount of the Metropolitan Council’s forecasted population and household increases. 9.The proposed increased density is consistent with surrounding suburban communities and would allow for the more efficient use of underutilized surface parking space as part of the proposed development. 10.With the conditions included herein, the site will provide a significant investment into the existing Multi-family residential areas of the City and will benefit the City with an increased efficiency in use of land and increased building activity. 11.The proposed multi-family apartment building supports investment within existing residential developments, supports the maintenance of the City’s existing housing stock, and provides an opportunity for an apartment owner within the City to expand their housing stock and provide additional residential housing units to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the Planned Unit Development - Final Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development as proposed under Planning Case 2026-03, is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1.The Applicant/Developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Mendota Heights. 2.No Building Permits will be issued until the Applicant provides evidence to the City of the recording of the Final Development Plan and the Development Agreement. 3.The Zoning Amendment approved under Resolution No. 2026-06 will be established by rezoning the full extent of the project area to a Planned Unit Development Overlay District in concurrence with the approved Final Development Plan. 4.The Variance from the density requirement to construct 225 units on an 18.2 acre site, approved under Resolution No. 83-95 (paragraph three of said Resolution) is hereby rescinded. With the exception of rescinding paragraph three of Resolution 83-95, all conditions and approvals of the previously approved PUD (dated November 1, 1983) shall remain in full force and effect. 5.The new building shall be constructed only in conformance to building and site plans certified by registered architects and engineers (as applicable); and in accordance with all architectural and building standards found under Title 12-4B-3, Subpart E “Architecture and Building Design Standards” 6.The proposed water system shall be designed and constructed to Saint Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS) standards, including written approval of the design layout prior to final City Council approval. Page 50 of 124 Res. No. 2026-22 Page 4 of 5 7.The Developer/Applicant shall submit final grading, utility, and site plans, and architectural construction drawings for permitting, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. Building and grading permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction commencement of any work. 8.All grading and construction activities as part of the proposed development shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes, as well as in compliance with the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. 9.A performance bond or letter of credit shall be supplied by the applicant in an amount equal to at least one and one-half (1 1/2) times the value of such screening, landscaping, or other improvements, to be included as part of the Development Agreement. 10.The Developer and/or their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan and which have died shall be replaced as soon as seasonal or weather conditions allow. All landscape areas must be irrigated. 11.A separate Forest Alteration Permit application and Forest Management Plan is required to be submitted to the City prior to building permit issuance to confirm compliance with the Urban Forest Preservation Ordinance. The applicant shall post a tree replacement escrow with the City and shall mitigate tree replacement in appropriate areas of the property as reviewed and approved by the Natural Resources Manager and Community Development Manager. If compliance with the tree replacement requirement is not feasible, the City may approve alternative tree replacement measures within the Forest Alteration Permit. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April, 2026. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ________________________________ Mayor Stephanie B. Levine ATTEST ________________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 51 of 124 Res. No. 2026-22 Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A Legal Description PID No. 27-44925-01-010 Lot 1, Block 1, Lexington Heights Addition Drafted by: City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Page 52 of 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 606 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LEXINGTON HEIGHTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND A ZONING AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights does ordain as follows: Section 1. Amendment. Title 12 of the Mendota Heights City Code is hereby amended to allow for a new 84-unit apartment building in accordance with the Planned Unit Development Amendment Approval under Resolution No. 2026-06 and Resolution No. 2026-22 and the Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement on file in the City Clerk’s office dated _________________, 2026, for the following property located within the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1; and Outlots A and B, all in Lexington Heights Section 2. Rezoning. The City of Mendota Heights’ Official Zoning Map, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, shall be amended by rezoning 16.31 acres of land legally described in Section 1 of this Ordinance from R-3 Multi Family Residential to R-3/PUD Multi Family Residential District/Planned Unit Development Overlay District. The zoning map of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Title 12, shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Community Development Manager or their designee shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the city clerk’s office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately following adoption and publication according to law. ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 2026 by the City Council for the City of Mendota Heights. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 53 of 124 6666666666666 6 666666666666666666 6 6 66666666666666666666666666666666* ! ³ !* * * * ! * * ! "! * """" * "" " ³ * ! " ! ³ ³ **!! ³ * ³" ³³ " " ³ ³³ ³³ ³³ ³ ³ ! ! * ! ! 6 666666666666 6!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2300 2370 2330 2431 1031 2258 1145 2320 1062 2401 949 9491031 1031LEXINGTON AVEINTERSTATE 35EINTERSTATE 35E NB RAMPINTERSTATE 35ENearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial MapLexington Heights PUD Date: 11/21/2025 City ofMendotaHeights0310 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 54 of 124 Councilor Lorberbaum moved to approve RESOLUTION 2026-04 APPOINTING CITY ADVISORYCOMMISSION MEMBERS.Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.Ayes: 5Nays: 0B) RESOLUTION 2026-06 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON THE APPLICATION OF CHASE REALESTATE FOR A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ZONING AMENDMENT TO THELEXINGTON HEIGHTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 2300 LEXINGTON AVENUE(PLANNING CASE NO. 2025-16)Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a brief background on this item. The Councilwas being asked to consider an application request for a Preliminary Development Plan and ZoningAmendment to the Lexington Heights Planned Unit Development.Joe McElwain, Chase Real Estate, referenced information on recent housing reports, which show a lackof supply for residents, with a vacancy rate of one percent. The study noted that in order to reach a healthybalance of supply and demand, over the next five years, Mendota Heights would need to build over 1,200units of housing. He noted that only two percent of people live and work within Mendota Heights, whichmeans that 98 percent of those who work in Mendota Heights actually live in Mendota Heights. He statedthat they surveyed many of the apartments in Mendota Heights and found that all the buildings are 99percent occupied. He provided information on typical density for apartments, noting that the densitywithin the R-3 district is similar to the density of single-family residential. He provided backgroundinformation on the original approval for the Lexington Heights property that required a large amount ofparking, much of which is not needed. He stated that the proposal today would be a very efficient use ofspace, as they would reutilize a parking area and 14,000 square feet of grass to create additional housingunits. He referenced the requested setback reduction to the freeway and noted some comparisons alongthe corridor. He commented that the setback as proposed would be larger than other existing buildings.He noted that the height difference would be very small in the visual perception between the existingbuildings and the proposed four-story building. He provided images from a similar project that wascreated and built in Egan. He noted that the goal in this project would be to provide more apartment homefloorplan options. He believed that this project would provide benefit to the City while allowing expansionof a local property owner and manager in a cost-effective manner, through efficient use of space andwithout a request for financial assistance.Councilor Maczko stated that the housing report mentioned was not completed by the City and explainedthat it was done by the County on a county-wide scope. He noted that the Council discussed how MendotaHeights is almost fully developed, and people like the community for what it is. He stated that MendotaHeights has high-quality development with people who maintain their properties. He noted that in hisexperience, Mr. Riley does take excellent care of his property. He stated that if a community is doingthings well, there will always be more demand than supply, and if you tip that point, the things that peopleenjoy about the community may be taken away. He appreciated the additional information about theactual distance from the freeway, which does seem consistent with other buildings. He stated that hisconcern with the proximity to the freeway is that residents often complain about noise from the freeway.He recognized the density requested is higher than the allowed range and has concerns that this would betight on the site. He noted that the current layout allows for circulation, whereas the proposed layoutJanuary 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 3 of 12Page 55 of 124 would essentially create a long dead-end. He noted that emergency vehicles would need to back up to getout of the site rather than circulating.Mr. McElwain stated that they have spoken with the City Engineer about additional options for circulationas well.Councilor Maczko stated that the other three buildings are three-story with the same style, and thisbuilding would look out of place as the architecture would not match. He stated that the site feels moreopen as it exists today. He commented that he would support additional buffering, especially to the north.He believed that the original PUD intended to preserve open space. He asked if there was any informationon why the parking for the 2300 property was designed on that side, as the other buildings have theirparking on the other side.Mr. McElwain identified the location of a gas line, which drove the original design and layout. He statedthat most apartment buildings are developed through PUDs.Councilor Maczko asked if there is a plan to add a building in front of the building to the south.Mr. McElwain replied that this proposed location is the only option on this site. He stated that Mr. Rileyhas other plans in the future to update the existing buildings, add amenities, and update landscaping.Mayor Levine asked staff to provide additional information on the use of a PUD for the originaldevelopment and whether it was intended to preserve open space.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that generally, a PUD is used for apartmentbuildings because of the phased development approach or because there are multiple structures on oneproperty. She stated that the PUD ordinance in place in the 1980's allowed for flexible development anddid not get into the specificity that the current ordinance does. She stated that the flexibility at that timewas related to density, which was granted through a variance, and due to right-of-way changes, whichimpacted the density.Mayor Levine asked for more information on the historical density.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that when the PUD was approved, there was nota listed range for density for this category, and instead was allowed at ten units per acre. She commentedthat since the 1990s, a range for density was created, with six to nine units per acre projected for the last30 years. She stated that the need for the variance was related to the possible unit rate that could havebeen achieved in the absence of the right-of-way creation.Mayor Levine asked if there are any existing apartment buildings in Mendota Heights within the six-to-nine-unit range.Community Development Director Sarah Madden replied that the property immediately to thewhich is a multi-family townhome development owned by Dakota County CDA, is within that range.south,January 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 4 of 12Page 56 of 124 Councilor Mazzitello referenced the townhome property to the south, noting that townhomes aretraditionally considered medium-density development, although the zoning is R-3. He asked if there is ahigh-density development anywhere in Mendota Heights that is at or under nine units per acre.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that she is not aware of any.Councilor Mazzitello commented that there is not an apartment building anywhere close to nine units peracre. He referenced the issue of architectural compatibility, noting that the concept shown is in the styleof a contemporary building that would be built today. He wondered if there was language in the originalDevelopment Agreement that stated that any future development would need to be architecturallycompatible.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that this Development Agreement, perhaps dueto its age, does not have those architectural standards built in. She stated that the PUD ordinance doesspeak about compatibility between phases of development. She commented that the determination wasmade that the color scheme and general use of materials would be compatible under the constraints ofmodern construction. She noted that additional requirements could be made to increase compatibility.Councilor Maczko referenced the statement that the PUD was probably used for density, but believed thatthe variance covered the issue of density.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that there was a variance from the density. Sheexplained that the original development came through as a PUD, and after a few review meetings, it wasdetermined that the variance should be used for density.Mayor Levine commented that in the past, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) had been used as well, butnow a zoning amendment is used, and asked staff to provide additional input.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that previously, a PUD was approvedthrough a CUP, and now a PUD is reviewed as an overlay zoning district. She stated that it is processedin the same way as a zoning amendment is reviewed, rather than the process for a CUP.Councilor Paper stated that the presentation tonight is the first mention he had seen of park dedication andasked if there would be park dedication for the project.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that a park dedication recommendationhas not been included at this time.City Attorney Amy Schmidt stated that park dedication is part of a subdivision process, whereas this is anamendment to an existing development, and park dedication is not triggered.Councilor Lorberbaum noted a proposed height difference of 7.5 feet and asked for more information onthe statement that, visually, there would only be 4.5 feet difference.Mr. McElwain replied that there would be a seven-foot difference, but also noted the changes in gradeelevation between the existing building and the proposed building.January 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 5 of 12Page 57 of 124 John Riley, property owner/applicant, confirmed that the new building would be seven feet higher thanthe existing building.Councilor Lorberbaum referenced the concept of a circular path for emergency vehicles and noted that inher conversations with Mr. Riley, he noted the desire not to disrupt trees in that manner, and perhapssomething could be done by the edge of the garage.Mr.McElwain stated that there are options for a full turnaround or a hammerhead turnaround.identified the area in which that could be placed.HeCouncilor Lorberbaum referenced the issue of the setback to the freeway and asked if the City cares aboutwhere the property line ends or the distance between the building and the freeway.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that a setback is from the property line, butthe applicant has provided context on why they are supporting the request and why the City could considerthat request. She noted that there is a larger area between the property line and highway, and this lot isconsidered to be a double frontage lot. She noted that those are factors that the City can consider whenreviewing that request.Councilor Lorberbaum appreciated that Mr. Riley is respected and has a great record withincommunity. She stated that if the building were shortened a bit, the setback would be met.Mr. McElwain confirmed that is an option, but believed it to be impractical in this situation.theMayor Levine noted an email received about Lake Augusta and asked if this development would impactthe waters of Lake Augusta.Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that there would be less runoff and improved water qualityas a result of the project because of the requirements of development. He noted that the existing pondwould need to be expanded as well.Mr.McElwain noted that because of changes in water quality requirements, they would need to makechanges to the site and would overall provide improvement to what exists today.Mayor Levine asked what would be improved on the site in return for the amendment to the PUD. Sherecognized that Lexington Heights is a desirable place to live, which is evident through the publiccomments and low vacancy rate.Mr. Riley commented that they would improve the water quality and treatment onsite. He stated that heenvisions a rejuvenation of the site as a whole, noting potential amenities such as a golf simulator andpickleball court. He stated that he attempts to do refreshes of the interior spaces, such as the lobby andclubhouse, which were done about ten years ago, and would be completed again. He stated that when thiswas originally constructed, there was laundry provided on each floor with laundry hook-ups in the units.He noted that since that time, they have installed in-unit washer and dryers, and there are discussions toconvert the larger laundry rooms for other uses such as workout areas or available for rental by residentsJanuary 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 6 of 12Page 58 of 124 for storage, workspace, or other desired use. He stated that this would be an effort to bring the site intothe modern day.Mayor Levine asked for information on trees and vegetation.Mr. Riley commented that any trees removed would be replaced per City Code. He stated that he woulduse this opportunity to add more landscaping and vegetation on the site.Mr. McElwain noted that as the application progresses, they would complete a full landscaping plan,which would include the additional buffering and could also add more trees and entrance plantings. Henoted that there would be outdoor patios for the clubhouses that would have additional landscaping aswell.Mayor Levine recognized that this would be a redevelopment and that is the phase the city isredevelopment. She stated that a first-time homebuyer in 2021 was 31, whereas now the first-timehomebuyer is 40. She noted that a three-bedroom apartment does allow for a family with children andasked if there is a plan to provide amenities for children.in:Mr. Riley replied that there are playsets at some of the communities. He stated that the park is about .25miles away, and there are other amenities and recreation opportunities within the clubhouse. He statedthat if there was a need for a play area, he would consider doing that, but he has not experienced that needyet. He commented that they are seeing more people making the choice to rent rather than purchasehomes.Councilor Maczko asked if there could be drive lanes around the parking as proposed, which would allowfor the circulation of vehicles.Mr. McElwain stated that the intention was to leave greenspace around the building and includelandscaping around the building, which only leaves a 60-foot parking lot. He stated that if he followedthe scenario of Councilor Maczko, he would have to remove the landscaping and some of the green space.Mr. Riley stated that he prefers to include the turnaround by the garage, as they have discussed with theFire Department.Councilor Maczko commented that there are also Amazon deliveries coming daily.Mr. Riley commented that they would work on that, and if that is desired, they could accommodate thatchange.Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2026-06 APPROVING A ZONINGAMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - AMENDMENT TO THE 1983LEXINGTON HEIGHTS, WITH THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE TOCONDITION 10: AND TURNAROUND CAPABILITY TO THE NORTH SECTION OF THE NEWBUILDING PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.Councilor Paper seconded the motion.January 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 7 of 12Page 59 of 124 Further discussion: Mayor Levine asked if water quality treatment is covered under the proposedconditions.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that condition five references the City's LandDisturbance Guidance Document, which mentions stormwater improvements, and noted that conditionfour also addresses that item.Councilor Lorberbaum commented that the language used for the setback seems a bit harsh, using threat,and suggested using hazard to be less harsh.Councilor Mazzitello explained that a resolution must use the codified language, which is threat.Councilor Lorberbaum asked if anything would need to be added related to MnDOT permits.Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that MnDOT is its own permitting agency. He stated thatMendota Heights does not have a noise permit. He noted that the other concern of MnDOT was relatedto drainage, and drainage would not flow towards the freeway.Councilor Maczko asked if there were items that could be added to make the appearance more compatiblewith the existing buildings.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that if the Council would like, it could adda condition to increase compatibility. She stated that the proposed color scheme and some materials arecompatible.Councilor Maczko commented that the existing buildings seem to have covered patios, which make themlook more residential than commercial. He asked if there was anything the applicant could do to makethe building fit in better on the site.Councilor Mazzitello stated that this is the first plan, and the applicant will continue to work with staff.He noted that perhaps that is something that is included in the Development Agreement rather than thePreliminary Plat.Councilor Maczko commented that he wants it to be on the record.Mayor Levine stated that could be added as condition 12 and asked for assistance in drafting a potentialcondition.Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that she does have concerns about shoehorningsomething specific while also does not want to be too broad. She stated that condition 12 could direct theapplicant to continue to work with staff on incorporating architectural design features, which increasecompatibility to the existing structures and place within the development.Councilor Maczko suggested that the new condition read, provide additional architectural design detailsto better integrate and coordinate with existing buildings.January 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 8 of 12Page 60 of 124 Councilor Maczko moved to amend THE MOTION TO INCLUDE CONDITION 12, PROVIDEADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DETAILS TO BETTER INTEGRATE ANDCOORDINATE WITH EXISTING BUILDINGS.Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.Ayes: 5Nays: 0Councilor Paper noted a goal within the Comprehensive Plan that this project would achieve related tohousing products and opportunities. He stated that this operator has been in the community for over 40years and is well-respected. He reviewed the density of the existing buildings in the R-3 district and statedthat the City is using flexibility to add to the housing stock on a property that fits well with a longer-termvision. He stated that low vacancy rates mean that there is demand and the product is deemed as quality.He stated that this project fits the stated goals of the City well, with a known developer who maintainstheir property to a high standard.Ayes: 5Nays: 0C) MUNICIPAL CAMPUS PROJECТCity Administrator Cheryl Jacobson provided a brief background on this item. The Council was beingasked to consider establishing a Municipal Campus Project Oversight Committee and to review theMunicipal Campus Project Communications and Engagement Plan.Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson reviewed the project communications and engagement plan.Councilor Maczko asked how residents are able to influence the project.Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson reviewed the different ways residents can provide input,which does influence the project. She stated that the goal is to identify different opportunities for thepublic to provide input.Councilor Maczko recognized that this is not going out for a referendum and therefore the City Councilwill be the decision makers. He noted that there are times when residents become informed and askedwhere the opportunities are that allow the public to speak and have an influence on what happens.Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson noted that the items within the communications plan markedat level two would identify those opportunities. She recognized that the input would be provided to theCouncil, and it would still be the decision of the Council as to whether that input influences their decision.Mayor Levine asked for more information on opportunities that would be available for residents thatcannot attend something in person.Chris Ziemer, ICS, identified opportunities that would be available for residents to provide input withoutleaving their homes.January 20, 2026, Mendota Heights City CouncilPage 9 of 12Page 61 of 124 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-06 RESOLUTION APPROVING A ZONING AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - AMENDMENT TO THE 1983 LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2300 LEXINGTON AVENUE PLANNING CASE N0.2025-16] WHEREAS Chase Real Estate (or "Applicant" or "Developer") in cooperation with Riley Family Lexington Heights Limited Partnership (Condor Living / Lexington Heights Apartments and as "Owner") has applied for a Zoning Amendment and Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development (PUD), as proposed under Planning Case 2025-16 (84-Unit Apartment Building) Project") for the property located at 2300 Lexington Avenue and legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan to amend the PUD as presented herein would authorize the construction of a new four-story multi -family apartment building containing 84-units and associated resident amenities and exterior site improvements including a fitness area, patio space, common lounge space, new landscaping, and stormwater management improvements; and WHEREAS, the subject property is guided HDR-High Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and is situated in the R-3 Multi -Family Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 1983, the City Council approved the Planned Unit Development for Lexington Heights Apartments, as well as a Variance from the density requirement to construct 225 units on an 18.2 acre site; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1984, the City Council approved the Final Plat for LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION, which dedicated additional right -of --way and reduced the size of the property to 16.3 acres; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission opened, held, and closed a public hearing on the application request at their regular meeting, and whereupon receiving the presented staff report and hearing testimony from three (3) residents on the application, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to table the requested subdivision plat application to December 29, 2025; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2025, The Mendota Heights Planning Commission opened, held, and closed the second public hearing on the application request, and the tabled application was presented by staff with follow-up on discussion items from the prior meeting, and following Page 62 of 124 discussion on this item a motion was made and seconded to deny the appncauon wmch Caned oy a 2-4 vote. A second motion to approve the application with findings -of -fact and conditions was made which resulted in a tied vote 3-3 and through discussion the Planning Commission determined that this tied vote would be sent to the City Council for their discussion and review of the application, including Planning Commission review comments; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights CAy Council that the Zoning Amendment and Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development as proposed under Planning Case 202546, is hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment —Preliminary Development Plan, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable City Code requirements for such a planned development in the R-3 Multi Family Residential Base Zoning District and HR — High Density Residential Land Use area. 2. The deviations of the Planned Unit Development Amendment include: a. To allow an increase in density to 18.9 units per acre on the 16.31 acre site b. To allow a reduced principal building setback from the east lot line of 25.2-ft 3. The proposed project utilizes the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning flexibility to enhance development of the property without negatively impacting surrounding land uses and natural resources. 4. The reduced setback at the east property line for the principal building does not pose any threat to the general health, safeTy and welfare of the surrounding properties or diminishes the usefulness of the planned development of this property. The increase in residential net density to 18.9 units per acre will be an effective and unified treatment of the existing Planned Unit Development; will provide additional housing unit types that are in -demand within the community; and can be developed to harmonize with existing development in the areas surrounding the project site and within the City as a whole. 6. Construction of the proposed 84-unit multi -family residential building will contribute to a significant amount of the Metropolitan Council's forecasted population and household increases. 7. The proposed increased density is consistent with surrounding suburban communities and would allow for the more efficient use of underutilized surface parking space as part of the proposed development. Res. No. 2026-06 Page 2 of 6 Page 63 of 124 8. With the conditions included herein, the site will provide a significant investment into the existing Multi -family residential areas of the City and will benefit the City with an increased efficiency in use of land and increased building activity. 9. The proposed multi -family apartment building supports investment within existing residential developments, supports the maintenance of the City's existing housing stock, and provides an opportunity for an apartment owner within the City to expand their housing stock and provide additional residential housing units to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the Zoning Amendment and Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Development Plan to amend the 1983 Lexington Heights Apartments Planned Unit Development as proposed under Planning Case 2025- 16, is hereby approved with the following conditions: The Applicant/Developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Mendota Heights. 2. The new building shall be constructed only in conformance to building and site plans certified by registered architects and engineers (as applicable); and in accordance with all architectural and building standards found under Title 12-4B-3, Subpart E "Architecture and Building Design Standards" 3. The proposed water system shall be designed and constructed to Saint Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS) standards, including written approval of the design layout prior to final City Council approval. 4. The Developer/Applicant shall submit final grading, utility, and site plans, and architectural construction drawings for permitting, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. Building and grading permits shall be obtained from the City prior to construction commencement of any work. 5. All grading and construction activities as part of the proposed development shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes, as well as in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance Document. 6. The Final Development Plan shall include an updated landscape plan with a detailed landscaping schedule for planned plant materials. The Applicant/Developer will work with Planning staff to review and approve additional plant materials within a buffer area between the proposed patio courtyard and the reduced setback area from the east property line boundary with I-35E, along the north property line which is shared with the R-1 zoned property, and in the area of construction of the retaining wall and fire turnaround adjacent to the parking garage entrance, by installing additional landscape materials including berms, hedges, or other landscape materials where feasible. Res. No. 2026-06 Page 3 of 6 Page 64 of 124 is. A pertormance bond or letter of credit shall be supplied by the applicant in an amount equal to at least one and one-half (11/2) times the value of such screening, landscaping, or other improvements, to be included as part of the Development Agreement. 9. The Developer and/or their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan and which have died shall be replaced as soon as seasonal or weather conditions allow. All landscape areas must be irrigated. 10. The Applicant/Developerwlll work with the fire department personnel in determining final design, location and specifications to the fire safety access area to the north portion of the new building. 11. A separate Forest Alteration Permit application and Forest Management Plan is required to be submitted to the City prior to building permit issuance to confirm compliance with the Urban Forest Preservation Ordinance. The applicant shall post a tree replacement escrow with the City and shall mitigate tree replacement in appropriate areas of the property as reviewed and approved by the Natural Resources Coordinator and Community Development Manager. If compliance with the tree replacement requirement is not feasible, the City may approve alternative tree replacement measures within the Forest Alteration Permit, 12. The Applicant/Developer shall provide additional architectural design details to better integrate and coordinate with existing buildings. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20s' day of January, 2026. CTTY COUNCIL CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Mayor tephanie Levine I:VYIY N ncy BaAer, City Clerk Res. No. 2026-06 Page 4 of 6 Page 65 of 124 Drafted by: City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Res. No. 2026-06 Page 5 of 6 Page 66 of 124 r %nlolI A Legal Description PID No.27-44925-01-010 Lot 1, Block 1, Lexington Heights Addition Drafted by: City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Res. No. 2026-06 Page 6 of 6 Page 67 of 124 Lexington Heights Addition Final PUD Submittal Plans February 25, 2026 Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager City of Mendota Heights, MN RE: Lexington Heights Apartments - Addition 2320 Lexington Heights Ave S, Mendota Heights Ms. Madden: On behalf of Jon Riley and Lexington Heights Apartments, please find attached our Final PUD application and plan materials for our proposed 84-Unit apartment building “Lexington Heights Addition”. We have made plan improvements since our January 20th City Council Prelim PUD Meeting. Per Council’s guidance and conditions, these are the main updates: 1. Eliminated parking lot dead-end and Fire Truck turn-around problem. a. We are now connecting the existing west driveway by extending it to the parking lot. b. Simplifies vehicle circulation. c. Also affords us better, safer separation of resident traffic and construction-phase traffic. 2. Relocated our Garage Door entry. i. Simplifies circulation; direct view and leads from existing surface lot drive aisle. ii. Eliminates the tall northern retaining wall we had shown that would have involved excavating against the NE property corner trees. 3. New Landscape Plans show a generous amount of trees and buffering along north property line and east i35 property line as requested by Planning Commission and Council. 4. Updated Exterior Elevations: we have updated materials, improved entry lobby exterior design, added roof parapet details and colors to better complement the existing buildings. The 4th floor siding will be a high-quality architectural metal vertical panel to look like a 'mansard' roof to relate to the mansard roof of the existing bldgs. The entry door / lobby has been enlarged to look like the storefront and windows of the existing building entries. Thank you, Joe McElwain Development Director Chase Real Estate Page 68 of 124 1 Lexington Heights Addition Final PD Submittal - Staff Comments April 7th, 2026 Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager City of Mendota Heights, MN RE: Lexington Heights Apartments - Addition Post –Submittal – Plan Revision Comments 2320 Lexington Heights Ave S, Mendota Heights Ms. Madden: On behalf of Jon Riley and Lexington Heights Apartments, please find attached our revised civil plans addressing trail elevation, storm pond EOF, and various utility -related questions. Also enclosed is the updated landscaping plan, which reflects the revised tree survey and removal of identified invasive species. A detailed narrative responding to staff comments from our final PUD submission is included on page 2. We look forward to continuing to work with you and the City of Mendota Heights as we move to the next steps. Thank you, Joe McElwain Development Director Chase Real Estate Page 69 of 124 2 April 7, 2026 RE: Lexington Heights Addition City Comments - Summary of Revisions 1. Fire Truck Lane | Dead-end (Parking Lot drive lane revised layout) • We revised the parking lot plan to do the obvious best solution; connect to the existing NW driveway by extending it. • Our new water service and stormwater pipes serving the new building is located along this north stretch anyways; construction already had to occur along here. • This will provide the fire truck continuous circulation requested through the site. • This eliminates a significant retaining wall against the NE trees; where the previously proposed garage door was located. • This saves various trees that would have been eliminated to build that retaining wall. • Additional Benefit: this will serve as the primary Construction Traffic entry to the new building; providing for a separate / safe resident entry maintained to the South. • Our neighbor to the north has reviewed and is okay with this new parking lot drive lane. 2. Landscape Plans • We added extensive landscape screening -as requested- along the north shard property line and i35 eastern property line. 3. Building Architecture • Refer to the last page of the Architecture submittal; our team researched additional material manufacturers to propose metal panel siding and real bed -depth brick products to better match the existing building colors. • The design is more contemporary; we believe it will complement the existing buildings while offering a fresh design that new construction practices include; such as larger, higher quality windows, metal non-combustible decks, taller ceilings, etc. • The front door added more glass sim to the entries of the existing buildings. 4. Additional Site Recreation | Amenities • The Owner is willing to provide additional outdoor amenities to the club house to serve the whole property. These improvements can occur concurrently with the improvements to the new building. See updated Civil Plan C401. 1. The basketball court will be renovated into pickleball courts. 2. New concrete patio pads will be installed for community dining tables and overhead pergolas. 3. The pool patio will be expanded to increase capacity and provide space for additional lounge seating. Page 70 of 124 April 2nd, 2026 Joe McElwain Chase Real Estate, Inc 2100 County Road 42 West Burnsville, MN 55337 joe@chasere.com RE: Lexington Heights – City Comment Responses Dear Mr. McElwain, Below is a summary of our revisions relating to the City of Mendota Heights comments received on March 11, 2026: Sheet C103: •Trail removals shown on utility plan to ensure removals don’t occur with general demolition, and happen closer to utility installation to keep trail downtime to a minimum •Tree removals now included in sheet C401 •Revised sanitary service location should not impact existing driveway (~15’ separation) Sheet C300: •Bio-Rolls added to site facing side of trench drain for inlet protection Sheet C400: •EOF location and elevation now identified Sheet C500: •Notes added to ensure pipe is outside of trail section. Trail grade identified on grading plan. Trail elevation below EOF, so no impact is expected. •Sanitary service revised to tie into Eastern manhole with inside drop. City detail added to sheet C700. Additional detail to be acquired and added prior to permit issuance. Sincerely, Eric Fagerberg, PE (MN) Project Manager Page 71 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoo G G G G G G G G G GGGGGG G XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooo o o o OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU E E E E E E E E T T V T >>>IIIIIIIIIIIII XXXXI I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>BENCHMARK #1 TNH=892.69 PROPOSED BUILDING STMH-104 STMH-103 CBMH-102 CBMH-101 FES-100 STMH-106 CB-105 STMH-107 FES-200 OCS-201 RD-2 TRENCH DRAIN-1 RD-1 EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND LEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35ESSMH-1 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282TS.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282TS C100TITLE SHEETF:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282TS.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AMLOCATION MAP NO SCALE PROJECT COORDINATES N 44° 52' 22.70" W 93° 08' 42.62" GENERAL CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE:TBD PROJECT ENGINEER: CITY ENGINEER: 952-890-6044 (O)ERIC FAGERBERG, P.E. - JAMES R. HILL, INC. PROJECT CONTACTS RYAN RUZEK - PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DEVELOPER:JON RILEY - CONDOR CORPORATION XXX-XXX-XXXX (O) 651-255-1152 (O) 651-757-2859 (O)NPDES OFFICER:ELLIE BERGFALK - MPCA LEGEND EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREELINE/TREES>I EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN >I S OHP EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEOHP EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCEXXXX EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED ASPHALT SURFACE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN SB-1 >>PROPOSED DRAINTILE >>>>>>PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>PROPOSED WATERMAINII PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER >>PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE G G G EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS E E E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UFO UFO UFO EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC T T T EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE T EXISTING TV PEDESTALTV EXISTING WETLAND EDGE EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION PROPOSED RETAINING WALL VUN SITE Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENT MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA CONDOR CORPORATION 2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 FOR TITLE SHEET C100 INDEX C400 C101GENERAL NOTES GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C500UTILITY PLAN C600PAVING & DIMENSIONAL PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS C102 C300EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C301EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SWPPP NOTES C302EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C700-C701 DEMOLITION PLAN C103 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SHEET 1 BENCHMARKS #1 TNH AT WEST SIDE OF NEW PARKING LOT ELEV=892.69 C303EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C401TREE PERSERVATION Page 72 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282GEN.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282GEN C101GENERAL NOTESEPF TP-1 EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX EXISTING TREELINE/TREES>I EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN >I EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCEXXXX EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING RETAINING WALL LEGEND PROPOSED CONTOUR923 PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED ASPHALT SURFACE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED DITCH CHECK - POST GRADING/UTILITY CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SILT FENCEooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo PROPOSED SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED WIMCO OR EQUAL POST STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED YARD CB INLET PROTECTION POST STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROPOSED MNDOT "SOUTHERN BOULEVARD" SEED MIX SB-1 >>>>>>PROPOSED DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>>>PROPOSED PERFORATED DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PROPOSED WATERMAINII PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER >>PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE G G G EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS E E E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UFO UFO UFO EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC T T T EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING TELEVISION BOX EXISTING RAILROAD EXISTING CONTOUR923 EXISTING WETLAND EDGE EXISTING WETLAND EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PROPOSED MNDOT "WET DITCH" SEED MIX EOF PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooPROPOSED GRADING LIMITS PROPOSED SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTYllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllACEXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER EXISTING CLEANOUT EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING ELECTRIC METER EXISTING ELECTRIC OUTLET POST EXISTING FLAGPOLE EXISTING GROUND LIGHT EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING GUY WIRE POLE EXISTING HANDHOLE EXISTING LIFT STATION EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING MAILBOX EXISTING MANHOLE (UTILITY) EXISTING MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) EXISTING MANHOLE (TELEPHONE) EXISTING MANHOLE (WATER) EXISTING MONITORING WELL EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING PROPANE TANK EXISTING PIEZOMETER EXISTING SEMAPHORE EXISTING SPRINKLER HEAD EXISTING SIGN EXISTING VAULT EXISTING VENT PIPE EXISTING WELL E EXISTING GUARD POST U E T W MW Z V VP EXISTING OVERHEAD POWEROHPOHPOHP EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITYOHUOHUOHU EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEVISIONTVTVTV EXISTING DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>>>>>EXISTING GUARD RAILoooo EXISTING ADA PARKING EXISTING TEST PIT LOCATION T TV GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN COPIES OF THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR REQUIREMENTS: 1.THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2022 - CURRENT VERSION VARIES). 2.MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2025) AND ALL SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS. 3.CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) CONSTRUCTION STANDARD SPECIFICATION (2023). 4.MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE (2020). GENERAL NOTES 1.EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED BY JAMES R. HILL, INC, DATED 04/11/2025. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING SITE CONDITIONS AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THESE PLANS IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE “STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING EXISTING UTILITIES”, ASCE/UESI/CI 38-22. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF ANY DAMAGE OR DISCREPANCIES WITH THESE PLANS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, INCLUDING BY CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY UTILITIES REQUIRED TO REMAIN IN SERVICE THAT HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. REPAIR/REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED UTILITIES THAT WERE NOT IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK WILL BE DONE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND HOLD A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. A MINIMUM NOTICE OF 7 DAYS, INCLUDING TO CITY AND OTHER AGENCIES, SHALL BE PROVIDED. WHERE THE CITY/AGENCIES DO NOT REQUIRE A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING, A MINIMUM NOTICE OF 48 HOURS SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WITH UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLYING FOR, OBTAINING, AND COMPLYING WITH ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. COPIES OF ALL REQUIRED PERMITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 6.WHERE PROVIDED, QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY QUANTITIES AND TO PROVIDE THE QUANTITIES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS, SERVICES (GARBAGE, MAIL, ETC.), UTILITY SERVICES AND DRAINAGE (SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE) FOR ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND SITE FEATURES TO REMAIN, AND WILL BE SOLEY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS, INCLUDING AS-BUILT SURVEY(S), AS REQUIRED BY RELEVANT AGENCIES. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SOILS REPORT AND CONSTRUCT ALL IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL REQUIRED TESTING WITH THE OWNER'S TESTING REPRESENTATIVE. RE-WORK DUE TO TEST FAILURE(S), INCLUDING COSTS OF RETESTING, SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING PREPARATION OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IF REQUIRED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MN MUTCD. 13.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, INCLUDING STRUCTURAL, MEP AND LANDSCAPING SECTIONS, FOR ALL BUILDING AND BUILDING APPURTENANCE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS, UTILITY SERVICE LOCATIONS, PLANTINGS, AMENITY AREA DESIGNS, SITE ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS, ETC. 14.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SITE LIGHTING TO BE DESIGN-BUILD BY CONTRACTOR AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE APPROVED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN -OR- REFER TO SITE LIGHTING PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. 15.THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HARD COPIES AND/OR PDF PLANS. DESIGN TOOLS UTILIZED IN PREPARATION OF THESE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CIVIL 3D MODELS, ARE NOT DELIVERABLES. CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT THESE DESIGN TOOLS ARE NOT TO BE UTILIZED FOR LAYOUT OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16.ALL LOT AND EASEMENT DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FINAL PLAT. DEMOLITION NOTES 1.THIS PLAN IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK TO CONFIRM SCOPE OF REQUIRED WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER REGARDING ITEMS NOT IDENTIFIED FOR REMOVAL THAT MAY CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, REGARDLESS OF THE SCOPE OF REMOVALS SHOWN ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 2.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DEMOLITION, REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING AREAS IMPACTED BY DEMOLITION WITH MATERIALS IN COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS (E.G. PAVEMENT, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALK, ETC.), REGARDLESS OF THE SCOPE OF REMOVALS SHOWN ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.UTILITIES TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND TO A DISTANCE OF 10' BEYOND. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL UTILITY REMOVALS AND RELOCATION WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED FOR REMOVAL, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES AND SHRUBS ON AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE. PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF 4' HIGH ORANGE PLASTIC TREE PROTECTION FENCE AROUND THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREES/SHRUBS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, ETC., WITHIN THE FENCED AREA. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL TREE REMOVALS WITH OWNER AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCING REMOVALS. 9.ALL REMOVALS SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS TESTING REPRESENTATIVE. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS GENERAL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (GENERAL PERMIT). 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING ROUTINE INSPECTIONS, AND DOCUMENTING THE INSPECTIONS AND RESULTING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT. 3.THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CONSISTS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS (SHEETS C2.01 - C2.04), INCLUDING PLANS, DETAILS, NOTES AND NARRATIVE, ALONG WITH THE GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FULL SWPPP AND FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS THEREIN AT ALL TIMES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PHASE CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE DISTURBED AREA AND DURATION OF EXPOSED SOILS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BMPS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. ALL DOWNSTREAM BMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES IN AN AREA. 6.BMPS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS HAVE ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION IN ACCOR 7.THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS REFLECT SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (PHASE I) AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE (PHASE II). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLEMENT THE BMPS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AS NECESSARY THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO MEET THE INTENT AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SWPPP AND APPLICABLE PERMITS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL UPDATE THE SWPPP TO REFLECT PROGRESS, INCLUDING INSTALLATION/REMOVAL OF BMPS, DISTURBANCE/STABILIZATION OF SOILS, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A COPY OF THE AMENDED SWPPP ON SITE. 9.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING TIMING OF MAINTENANCE. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED SOILS THAT WILL WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD OF 7 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: a.TEMPORARY STABILIZATION (ONE YEAR COVER CROP): i.a.MAY 1 - AUGUST 1: MNDOT SEED MIX OATS (O), AT A RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. ii.b.AUGUST 1 - OCTOBER 1: MNDOT SEED MIX WINTER WHEAT (WW) AT A RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. ij.PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. ik.SEEDED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 11.ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES SHALL BE ENCIRCLED WITH PERIMETER CONTROL BMP(S) AND STABILIZED PER THE TIMELINE DESCRIBED ABOVE. STOCKPILES SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF SURFACE WATERS, AND SHALL BE PLACED AWAY FROM CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER. 12.AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR STEEPER SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR SOD. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE WASHOUT LOCATION ON THE SWPPP AND WITH A SIGN ON SITE. ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES FROM WASHOUT ACTIVITIES SHALL BE CONTAINED AND PREVENTED FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND. ALL WASTE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 14.THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN(S) SHALL BE STAKED OFF AND PROTECTED BY SILT FENCE AT ALL TIMES FROM COMPACTION, SEDIMENTATION, AND OTHER ACTIVITIES IMPACTING THE INFILTRATION CAPABILITIES OF THE SOIL. REFER TO INFILTRATION NOTES SECTION ON SHEET C101 FOR COMPLETE REQUIREMENTS. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DUST CONTROL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH APPROVED MATERIALS/METHODS. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, AND WHEN FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVING BMPS. UPON CONCURRENCE FROM THE OWNER AND ENGINEER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND FINAL STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT. SITE PLAN SITE PLAN NOTES 1.DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GUTTER OUT IN LOCATIONS WHERE DRAINAGE PATTERNS DIRECT RUNOFF AWAY FROM CURBS. ALL OTHER AREAS TO BE GUTTER IN DESIGN. 3.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC, SHALL CONFIRM TO THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MN MUTCD) AND APPLICABLE CITY REQUIREMENTS. 4.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY GRADES ALONG ADA ROUTES AND LOADING AREAS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE. MAXIMUM SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ALONG AN ADA ROUTE SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 1:20, WITH A CROSS SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 1:48. LOADING ZONES, INCLUDING PARKING STALLS AND STRIPED AREAS ADJACENT TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS, SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 1:48. CONTACT THE ENGINEER IF ADA CODE IS NOT MET IN ANY REQUIRED AREA. SLOPES IN EXCESS OF CODE MAXIMUM SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ACCEPTABLE SLOPES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 5.PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S SOILS REPORT. GRADING PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB REPRESENT GUTTER ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.THE SITE HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO DETERMINE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, INCLUDING SOIL CORRECTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF EXCESS MATERIALS AND/OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO GRADE SITE PER PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND SOIL REPORT(S). 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMITS FOR AND COMPLETE DEWATERING AS NECESSARY. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL FINISHED SURFACES PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. THIS INCLUDES EVALUATION OF GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACES (PAVEMENT/TOPSOIL/ETC.) TO CONFIRM FINISHED GRADES WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY. CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO REVIEW AREAS OF POTENTIAL POOR DRAINAGE. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TRUCK FOR TEST ROLLS AND COMPLETE SUBSEQUENT SOIL CORRECTIONS, BOTH AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S TESTING REPRESENTATIVE. 6.IF ALLOWED BY OWNER, CONTRACTOR MAY PROPOSE TRENCH BORROW TO ACQUIRE STRUCTURALLY SUITABLE MATERIAL. TRENCH BORROW OPERATIONS MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10' FROM THE TOP OF THE TRENCH TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND EXTEND AT A SLOPE OF 1:1 OR FLATTER FROM THERE. ALL TRENCH BORROW ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S TESTING REPRESENTATIVE. 7.FINAL GRADE TOLERANCES: FINAL GRADES SHALL BE WITHIN 0.05' OF PROPOSED ELEVATION. ANY AMOUNT OF VARIATION FROM PROPOSED GRADES THAT NEGATIVELY IMPACTS SURFACE DRAINAGE IS NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO OWNER. 8.RETAINING WALLS ARE TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND CONSTRUCTED OF A MATERIAL AND DESIGN SELECTED BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED ENGINEERED DRAWINGS OF ALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, ALONG WITH A LETTER CERTIFYING THAT ALL WALLS WERE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS. 9.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES (SEE DEMOLITION/LANDSCAPE/TREE PRESERVATION PLANS). INFILTRATION NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT INFILTRATION AREA(S) FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT-LADEN RUNOFF AT ALL TIMES. PRIOR TO COMMENCING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS AROUND INFILTRATION AREA AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS. PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS HAVE ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE ENGINEER HAS APPROVED REMOVAL. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT EXCAVATE WITHIN 3' OF THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION ON ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS HAS BEEN ACHIEVED AND ENGINEER HAS APPROVED EXCAVATION. 3.ALL INLETS TO THE BASIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH BYPASSES TO PREVENT RUNOFF FROM REACHING THE BASIN. BYPASSES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL BASIN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE BASIN BOTTOM AND ALL TRIBUTARY AREAS, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 4.EXCAVATION OF THE INFILTRATION AREA SHALL BE COMPLETED FROM OUTSIDE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BASIN. IF WORK IS NECESSARY WITHIN THE BASIN FOOTPRINT, ONLY LOW GROUND PRESSURE TRACKED EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED TO COMPLETE THE WORK. RUBBER TIRE OR OTHER HIGH-PRESSURE EQUIPMENT IS NOT PERMITTED WITHIN THE BASIN FOOTPRINT. 5.FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL DECOMPACT INFILTRATION BASIN SOILS TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 18 INCHES BELOW SUBGRADE. DECOMPACTION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH A BACKHOE RIPPER ATTACHMENT OR OTHER METHOD APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6.INFILTRATION TESTING IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF INFILTRATION MEDIA. TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BE EITHER A DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TEST MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D3385 (MINIMUM 2 TESTS PER BASIN, PLUS ONE ADDITIONAL TEST FOR EACH O.5 ACRE OF BASIN FLOOR AREA) OR BY MASS INFILTRATION TEST. MASS INFILTRATION TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED BY FLOODING THE BASIN TO A DEPTH SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER, WITH RATES MEASURED BY THE OWNERS TESTING REPRESENTATIVE. IF ANY SINGLE TEST RESULT IS BELOW THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.9 INCHES PER HOUR, OR IF THE MASS INFILTRATION TEST FAILS TO COMPLETELY DRAIN WITHIN 48 HOURS, CONTRACTOR SHALL AMEND THE SOILS AND RETEST UNTIL THE AVERAGE RATE IS COMPLIANT AT NO COST TO OWNER. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF ALL RETESTING FOLLOWING THE INITIAL ROUND OF TESTS. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION THAT INFILTRATION MEDIA IS COMPLIANT WITH THE SPECIFIED MIX REQUIREMENTS A MINIMUM OF TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO DELIVERING MATERIAL TO SITE. INFILTRATION MEDIA SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SOON AFTER COMPLIANT TEST RESULTS ARE REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED AS PRACTICABLE. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS NOT PERMITTED WITHIN THE BASIN FOOTPRINT DURING OR AFTER PLACEMENT OF INFILTRATION MEDIA. PLACEMENT AND SPREADING OF INFILTRATION MEDIA SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH AN EXCAVATOR FROM OUTSIDE THE INFILTRATION BASIN FOOTPRINT. 8.BASIN SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESEED/REPLANT AREAS WHERE VEGETATION IS NOT ESTABLISHED AS NECESSARY UNTIL COVERAGE IS ACHIEVED. UTILITY PLAN UTILITY NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY ENGINEER ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) FOR ALL UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS. a.IN ADDITION TO COMPLYING WITH THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE FOR ALL UTILITIES NOT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS. b.MATERIALS SHALL MEET ALL STANDARDS REFERENCED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS 2.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 OR DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52 3.SANITARY SEWER MAINS, SERVICES AND FITTINGS a.ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. WHERE THIS COVER CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INSULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAILS. b.SANITARY SEWER MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: i.ALL MATERIALS OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIALS TABLE LISTED IN THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MN PLUMBING CODE AS FOLLOWS: 1.PVC SCHEDULE 40 UP TO A DEPTH OF 22' OF COVER OR AS SPECIFIED IN THE GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. 2.WHERE DEPTH EXCEEDS THIS MAXIMUM, CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE MNDLI ALTERNATE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS TO RECEIVE APPROVAL FOR A MATERIAL THAT COMPLIES WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAXIMUM DEPTH OF COVER. ii. PIPE WITHIN PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS: 1.IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS. WHERE CITY SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT LIST MATERIAL BASED ON DEPTH, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: a.DEPTH UP TO 16' SHALL BE SDR 35 b.DEPTH FROM 16' TO 22' SHALL BE SDR 26 c.DEPTH FROM 22' TO 32' SHALL BE PVC C900 d.DEPTH OVER 32' SHALL BE DIP c.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRACER WIRE FOR SANITARY SEWER MEETING THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS. 4.WATER MAINS, SERVICES AND FITTINGS a.ALL WATERMAINS AND SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. WHERE THIS COVER CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INSULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAILS. b.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: i.ALL MATERIALS OUTSIDE PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIALS TABLE LISTED IN THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MN PLUMBING CODE. ii.ALL MATERIALS WITHIN THE PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS. c.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRACER WIRE FOR WATER MEETING THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS. 5.STORM SEWER MAINS, SERVICES AND FITTINGS a.ALL STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. WHERE THIS COVER CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INSULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAILS, UP TO THE FIRST DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURE. b.STORM SEWER MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: i.ALL MATERIALS OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIALS TABLE LISTED IN THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MN PLUMBING CODE. 1.ALL ROOF DRAINS/BUILDING STORM CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PVC SCH40. 2.RCP AND/OR HDPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY/CEAM SPECIFICATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THE CONTRACTOR OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY FOR ALTERNATE MATERIALS. IN THIS CASE, STORM SEWER CROSSING WATERMAIN (WITHIN 10' HORIZONTALLY OF WATERMAIN) AND/OR WITHIN 10' OF A BUILDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIALS LISTED IN THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MN PLUMBING CODE. 3.ALL MANHOLE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH FLEXIBLE GASKETED WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE MN PLUMBING CODE. ii. PIPE WITHIN PUBLIC ROW/EASEMENTS: 1.RCP IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS. c.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRACER WIRE FOR STORM SEWER MEETING THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS. 6.PIPE JOINT DEFLECTION AND PIPE CURVATURE SHALL NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10' FROM OUTSIDE OF ALL SANITARY/STORM SEWER PIPES/STRUCTURES/FITTINGS AND WATER MAINS/SERVICES/FITTINGS. 8.WHERE WATERMAIN AND SEWERS CROSS, A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18” (OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE) SHALL BE PROVIDED, AND NO WATERMAIN JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF THE CROSSING. INSTALL INSULATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. 9.FILL BELOW PROPOSED UTILITY LOCATIONS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND TESTED/OBSERVED BY THE OWNER'S TESTING CONSULTANT. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATION DRAINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. BUILDING DRAINS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER TO DISCUSS BUILDING DRAIN CONNECTION LOCATIONS TO THE SITE STORM SEWER SYSTEM. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SITE SUBGRADE DRAINS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM TESTING AND, WHERE REQUIRED, SUBMIT REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CITY, MDH, AND MNDLI. COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER, ENGINEER AND UTILITY PROVIDER. 13.REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR ALL BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS. CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND MEP IMMEDIATE IF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN CIVIL AND BUILDING PLANS IS DISCOVERED. 14.WHERE A CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER EXISTS, CONTRACTOR SHALL LOWER WATERMAIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLUMBING CODE REQUIREMENTS AND CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. PLANS DO NOT DEPICT VERTICAL CONFLICTS - CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING LOCATIONS WHERE CONFLICTS EXIST AND INCLUDING THE REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS IN THE BASE BID. 15.WATERMAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT INTERMITTENT HIGH POINTS. HIGH POINTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT HYDRANTS OR AS NOTED ON PLANS. 16.ALL REQUIRED OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF RECORD PLANS TO OWNER AND ENGINEER FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF UTILITY INSTALLATION. ADDITIONALLY, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS/AS-BUILT SURVEY(S) TO AGENCIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH EACH AGENCY'S REQUIREMENTS. WHERE REQUIRED, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. Page 73 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EX 12" FES INV.=880.99 EX 12" FES INV.=879.71 EX 24" FES INV.=877.10 EX SSMH RIM=887.91 INV.=869.51 EX SSMH RIM=881.21 INV.=870.56 EX SSMH RIM=882.76 INV.=871.30 EX 12" FES INV.=880.00 EX 12" FES INV.=879.94 EX 12" FES INV.=879.37 EX 12" FES INV.=879.27 EX SSMH RIM=891.16 INV.=868.09EX 12" SANEX 12" SANEX 12" SANEX 12" WMEX 12" WMBENCHMARK TNH=892.69 EX 12" SAN EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING GARAGE GARAGEEXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND880882 88488688889089289 0 89 2 888 886 886888 890 892 884 882 882 884 886886884882882880878882 880 882 884 886 888 890 892 8968 9 8 9 0 0 90 2 9049 0 6 9 0 8 9 1 0 892894894 8928 8 6884 LEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35EPROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282EXC.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282EXC C102EXISTING CONDITIONSJSO LEGEND Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 TP-1 EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX EXISTING TREELINE/TREES>I EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN >I S EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCEXXXX EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING RETAINING WALL SB-1 G G G EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS E E E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING TELEVISION BOX EXISTING CONTOUR923 EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING ELECTRIC METER EXISTING ELECTRIC OUTLET POST EXISTING FLAGPOLE EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING HANDHOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING VAULT E V EXISTING OVERHEAD POWEROHPOHPOHP EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITYOHUOHUOHU EXISTING DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>>>>>EXISTING ADA PARKING EXISTING TEST PIT LOCATION T TV AC EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER Page 74 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EX 12" FES INV.=880.99 EX 12" FES INV.=879.71 EX 24" FES INV.=877.10 EX SSMH RIM=887.91 INV.=869.51 EX SSMH RIM=881.21 INV.=870.56 EX SSMH RIM=882.76 INV.=871.30 EX 12" FES INV.=880.00 EX 12" FES INV.=879.94 EX 12" FES INV.=879.37 EX 12" FES INV.=879.27 EX SSMH RIM=891.16 INV.=868.09 BENCHMARK TNH=892.69880882884886888890892 89 0 89 2 888 886 886888 890 892 884 882 882 884 886886884882882880878882 880 882 884 886 888 890 892 8968 9 8 9 0 0 90 2 9049 0 6 9 0 8 9 1 0 892894894 8928 8 6884 REMOVE EX ASP REMOVE EX CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) SAW CUT EX ASP REMOVE EX CURB AND GUTTER (TYP.) REMOVE EX LAND SCAPE REMOVE EX CONCRETE SIDEWALK REMOVE EX LIGHT POLE (TYP.) REMOVE EX LIGHT POLE (TYP.) SAW CUT EX ASP LEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35ESAW CUT EX ASP REMOVE EX LIGHT POLE (TYP.) EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282DEMO.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282DEMO C103DEMOLITION PLANEPF LEGEND Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 TP-1 EXISTING TELEPHONE BOX EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOX EXISTING TREELINE/TREES>I EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN >I S EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCEXXXX EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING RETAINING WALL SB-1 G G G EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS E E E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING TELEVISION BOX EXISTING CONTOUR923 EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING ELECTRIC METER EXISTING ELECTRIC OUTLET POST EXISTING FLAGPOLE EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING HANDHOLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING VAULT E V EXISTING OVERHEAD POWEROHPOHPOHP EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITYOHUOHUOHU EXISTING DRAINTILE >>>>>>>>>>>>EXISTING ADA PARKING EXISTING TEST PIT LOCATION T TV AC EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING AUTO SPRINKLER PROPOSED LIGHT POLE REMOVAL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL PROPOSED PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED SAW CUT Page 75 of 124 oooo o 7 28 28 16 4 13 12 19 1.Subject property's addresses are 2300 and 2320 Lexington Avenue, Mendota Heights, its property identification numbers are 27-44925-01-010 and 27-44925-00-010. 2.The bearing system is based on the North line of Lot 1, Block 1, LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION which is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 55 minutes 14 seconds East. 3.Field work was completed 6/16/2025. 4.The building(s) and exterior dimensions of the outside wall at ground level are shown on the survey. It may not be the foundation wall. 5.No specific title search for existence or non-existence of recorded or un-recorded easements has been conducted by the surveyor as a part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown. 6.The gross area of the subject property is 6.713 Acres or 292,409 square feet. NOTES Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property except as shown thereon. Signed this 20th day of June, 2025 Marcus F. Hampton MN L.S. No. 47481 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE The vertical datum is NAVD88. Benchmark Top nut hydrant east of building at 2300 Lexington Avenue. Elevation = 892.69 BENCHMARK 2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100, BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952.890.6044 www.jrhinc.comPLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS2300 AND 2320 LE;INGTON AVENUEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTACERTIFICATE OF SURVEYFORCONDOR CORPORATIONDRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PLM 6/20/2025 CAD FILE 24282s.dwg PRO-ECT NO. 24282-00 FILE NO. 1-25-036 SHEET 1 OF 1James R. Hill, Inc.LEGEND FOUND IRON PIPE AIR CONDITIONER UNIT AUTO SPRINKLER FLAGPOLE BOLLARD LIGHT POLE SIGN HANDICAP PARKING STALL STONE RETAINING WALL HANDHOLE TELEPHONE BOX OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC TRANSFORMER ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC OUTLET POST POWER POLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GAS METER UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT MANHOLE DECIDUOUS CONIFEROUS TREE LINE CHAIN LINK FENCE FLARED END SECTION PARKING STALL COUNT# LANDSCAPE MATERIAL BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE PAVER SURFACE o WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE BLOCK RETAINING WALL WOOD RETAINING WALL RIP RAP GARBAGE CAN GRILL PRELIMINARY Page 76 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII XXXXXXI I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EXISTING CLUBHOU S E POOL POND 12" RCP 12" RCP12" CIP12" CIP12" RCP12" RCPLEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35E892 890 888 89 0 892 892 890888 886 884 882 880 880878882884886888890892 886884882884 882 884 88 6 886888 890 892 8928948968989009029049069 0 8 910 912 892894896898900906 908 910 91 2 892894896898900902904882 892890890 892 888884 890888886888 89489287889289 4892 880882884886890888880882882880EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ BIO-ROLLS FOR TRENCH DRAIN INLET PROTECTION PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282ERC.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282ERC C300 EPF Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 PROPOSED CONTOUR923 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAINII PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER >>PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE>I >I OHP OHP X X X X G G G E E E UFO UFO UFO T T T EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREELINE/TREES EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING TV PEDESTAL EXISTING CONTOUR923 EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION S TV T EXISTING MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) EXISTING SIGN EXISTING VAULT E V PROPOSED SILT FENCEooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo PROPOSED SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED WIMCO OR EQUAL POST STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED YARD CB INLET PROTECTION POST STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROPOSED MNBWSR SEED MIX 33-261oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooEOF SB-1 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANPROPOSED SILT DIKE▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲ Page 77 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282ERD.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282ERD C301 VUN SITE 1-MILE RADIUS USGS MAP 1" = 400' USDA SOIL MAP 1" = 100' ESTIMATED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE EA 1 STANDARD DUTY SILT FENCE LF 1365 HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE LF 0 SILT DIKE LF 0 MNDOT SEED MIX WET DITCH (STORMWATER BASIN)AC 0.2 MNDOT SEED MIX SOUTHERN BOULEVARD (GENERAL MIX) - 1.5X AC 1.0 REAR YARD INLET PROTECTION EA 1 WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION EA 2 Lexington Heights Apartments - Mendota Heights, MN These plans shall be considered part of the project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP.) A copy of the SWPPP shall remain on site throughout active construction. PROJECT SUMMARY Lexington Heights Apartments is a multi-family residential development project. The project includes construction of building pads, streets, utilities and stormwater management basins. TYPE OF PROJECT: Development of 1 multi-family apartment building. TYPE OF WORK: Clearing and grubbing, demolition of existing houses, mass grading, utility and street construction and installation of phone, communication, gas and electric utilities. TOTAL SITE AREA:6.71 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:2.41 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:2.36 AC PROPOSED (DESIGN) IMPERVIOUS AREA:2.74 AC (0.38 AC NET INCREASE) IMPAIRED WATERS: There is an impaired lake within a 1-mile radius of the site. Augusta Lake has an EPA-approved impairment for: Nutrients These impairment(s) are considered to be construction related parameters and require the additional best management practices (BMPs) found in items 23.9 and 23.10 of the permit if the project has a discharge point on the project within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to the impaired water. 23.9: Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.4, and complete the stabilization within seven (7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. 23.10: Permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin as described in Section 14 for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. Also a mandatory Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) review is required by the MPCA if the project will disturb over 50 acres and has a discharge point on the project within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to the impaired water.  Owners must submit the application for coverage and the SWPPP at least 30-days before the construction start date.  The SWPPP can be attached electronically when using the online application. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW No environmental reviews were performed for the site, nor were any required by the City of Mendota Heights or for other agency approvals. CONSTRUCTION PHASING Mass grading will be one phase. Site grading and demolition may occur simultaneously. Mass grading is anticipated to take 3-4 weeks, which will include the construction of the stormwater basins. Utility installation will immediately follow grading. Upon completion of utilities, street construction will take place. Final construction work prior to home construction includes installation of phone, cable, gas and electric utilities, as well as retaining wall construction. MPCA STORMWATER PERMIT - RESPONSIBILITY Chase Development is the Owner for the development. The owner will apply for the Stormwater Permit and shall remain responsible for implementation of the SWPPP until final stabilization and filing of the N.O.T. or Subdivision Registration Form. OWNER: Jon Riley - Condor Corporation   PERMITTEE: Joe McElwain - Chase Development - 612-384-8266 OPERATOR(S): Name - Name - XXX-XXX-XXXX   ENGINEER: Eric P. Fagerberg, PE, Proj. Mgr - James R. Hill, Inc. - 952-890-6044   LGU CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek- Mendota Heights - 651-255-1152   MPCA COMPLIANCE: Ellie Bergfalk - 651-757-2859 The Contractor shall follow the implementation sequence as described on these plans. Amendments shall be made as site conditions change. Amendments shall be reviewed by the engineer. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP The GENERAL CONTRACTOR (GC) or their subcontractor is responsible for implementation of the SWPPP. Contractor has or will provide trained personnel responsible for inspection of erosion and sediment control BMPs. Either the Contractor or their subcontractor will provide trained personnel responsible for installing and maintaining erosion and sediment control BMPs. Long term operation and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management system will the responsibility of City of Mendota Heights. DOCUMENTATION OF TRAINED INDIVIDUALS Prior to start of construction, GC and/or their subcontractors shall ensure they have proper documentation for all individuals involved in implementing the SWPPP, as well as all involved individuals as described in section 21 of the General Stormwater Permit. SWPPP Design: Eric P Fagerberg, PE, training by University of Minnesota “Design of Construction SWPPP, 6/1/2023-5/31/2026. Instructor: Online. SWPPP Contact for Contractor: Name - XXX-XXX-XXXX Alternate SWPPP Contact for Contractor: Name - XXX-XXX-XXXX REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) Before the submitting the NOT, the permittee must meet the following requirements: 1.All construction activity associated with the project must be completed. 2.All pervious surfaces must be stabilized with permanent vegetative cover having a growth density of 70% of the expected full growth density (unless a specific area of the site specifies no vegetation.) 3.The stormwater treatment system (basins, pipes, structures, ditches, swales, etc.) is cleaned, removing all accumulation of sediment and debris. 4.All synthetic erosion and sediment prevention BMPs have removed. RECORD RETENTION During construction, the Contractor must retain a copy of the SWPPP and any amendments thereto on site at all times (or on the portion of the site for which the Contractor has control.) The SWPPP may be kept in a designated repository, in the construction field office or in an on-site vehicle during normal working hours. Copies of all maintenance records, inspection reports shall also be retained on site with the SWPPP. Upon completion of all construction and submittal of the NOT, the Owner shall retain the SWPPP documents for no less than three years, including the final SWPPP, other stormwater related permits, inspection and maintenance records, SWMP operational and maintenance agreements, and any other documents or binding agreements that relate to the operation and maintenance of the SWMP. GC and/or their subcontractors shall ensure they have proper documentation for all individuals involved. POTENTIAL FOR EROSION AND DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT There is moderate potential for erosion to occur. Certain portions of the site have grades exceeding 5% and shall be closely managed to prevent erosion. Temporary sediment traps or basins shall be considered in the final SWPPP implementation. Redundant protection is required along all wetlands. Contractor shall be required to appropriately manage individual erosion-prone areas, using BMP's suitable for the particular application. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING 1.Install perimeter control. Install inlet protection on existing structures. 2.Perform any clearing, as needed. 3.Perform demolition and debris removal. 4.Place topsoil perimeter berms and stabilize with seed and mulch. 5.Grade stormwater basins. Perform mass grading. As sheet drainage patterns develop, place silt fence or filter dikes as necessary to dissipate sediment transfer. 6.Construct utilities and pavements. 7.Construct buildings and structures. 8.Install phone, cable, gas and electric utilities. 9.Stabilize basins and swales with final stabilization. Stabilize landscape areas with final permanent vegetation, landscaping or turf. Stabilize future development areas with temp seed and mulch until final site development stage. GUIDANCE FOR TIMING OF BMP INSTALLATION Prior to Start of Construction 1.Install all new perimeter control BMPs as specified on plans prior to start of construction. Ensure that all existing perimeter control BMPs are functional. 2.Install or establish stabilized construction entrance. 3.Install protection devices on existing ponds, outlets, storm sewer inlets, etc. prior to start of construction. 4.Install sediment control practices on down gradient site perimeters During Construction 1.Identify topsoil stockpile locations and stabilize with temporary seed and mulch. 2.Areas in which construction becomes inactive must have stabilization commence immediately and be completed no later than 7 days after construction activity in that area has either temporarily or permanently ceased. 3.Provide temporary or permanent energy dissipation at all pipe outlets within 24 hours of connection to a Surface Water. 4.Minimize active construction areas. Where possible, establish final grade and stabilize with permanent vegetation, particularly around stormwater basins, filter strips, berms, etc. 5.During grading construction, utilize street “hold down” areas for sediment trapping. Direct overland construction runoff towards stormwater basins to the fullest extent practicable. 6.After construction is completed and grades are certified in a particular area of the site, review that the area is ready for permanent vegetation or other permanent cover. 7.Identify locations where topsoil stockpiles will be placed for builders. Stabilize with temporary seed and mulch and install perimeter control around stockpile circumference. Stockpiles shall be located outside of natural buffers or surface waters, included stormwater conveyances, unless there is a bypass in place. During Inactivity or After Construction 1.Areas in which construction becomes inactive must have stabilization commence immediately and be completed no later than 7 days after construction activity in that area has either temporarily or permanently ceased. 2.Final stabilization cover types are shown on Sheet X of the plan set. Final cover consists of vegetation, paved or gravel surfaces, sod, landscaping and buildings. 3.At the point where vegetated cover has achieved 70% of expected full growth density, vegetated areas can be considered fully stabilized. Removal of synthetic sediment control BMPs can be initiated. 4.Basins that have received sediment deposits shall be re excavated to plan grade, removing accumulated sediment. Verify final grade and basin capacities. 5.Inlet protection devices can be removed from structures as the attributing drainage area becomes fully stabilized. 6.Maintain street and drive sweeping activities until construction activities are fully completed. EROSION CONTROL BMPs The construction plans anticipate the use of, but are not limited to, the following Erosion Control BMPs: 1.Stabilized Construction Entrance 2.Temporary straw mulch as needed. 3.Seed and mulch 4.Erosion Control Blanket 5.Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) 6.Rip rap 7.Minimize active or disturbed work areas SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs The construction plans anticipate the use of, but are not limited to, the following Sediment Control BMPs 1.Sediment traps constructed in street subcut or other strategic locations. 2.Rock filter dikes in street subcut. 3.Utilize permanent stormwater basins as Temporary Sediment Basins. 4.Silt fence at project perimeter or toe of slopes. 5.Inlet protection on existing catch basins. 6.Inlet protection on existing culverts. 7.Inlet protection after utility construction. 8.Rock checks or bio roll checks. 9.Linear control along back of new curb and gutter or concrete (bio-roll or silt fence). 10.Post construction silt fence along normal wetted perimeters of basins and filter strips. 11.Routine street sweeping adjacent to construction entrance. Refer to plans for designated locations of BMPs, details and implementation notes. All BMP's selected and implemented shall be appropriate for the time of year, the current site conditions and for the estimated duration of use. Enhancing sedimentation with the use chemicals and chemical treatment systems is NOT anticipated for this project. BASIN AND TRAP DEWATERING BMPs Should the need arise for basin or trap dewatering, Contractor shall utilize a floating skimmer pump intake, such that the water is drawn from the surface of the basin. Pumped effluent shall be discharged, to the extent feasible, over well-vegetated upland areas. Effluent shall not be discharged into Surface Waters in a visually turbid state. Turbid effluent shall be filtered with mechanical devices, chemical filtering, or a combination thereof, until it is no longer visually turbid. POLLUTION CONTROL BMPs BMP's and good housekeeping should be implemented to prevent spills, pollutants or chemicals from entering the drainage system. 1.Fueling: A fixed fueling station is not anticipated. Contractor will be required to implement BMPs for onsite re-fueling of equipment. 2.Concrete Washout: Refer to MPCA's recommendation for concrete washouts. The developer has the ability to adjust location or to provide alternative washout containment. 3.There is not an anticipated need for storing chemicals, paints, solvents or other potentially toxic or hazardous materials on site. If at some point there is a need to store them on site, they must be stored in a receptacle or container capable of retaining spills. The container must be fenced and locked from unauthorized access. 4.Portable toilets shall be positioned and secured to prevent tipping over. SEED & MULCH SPECIFICATIONS Seed placed for permanent cover or final stabilization requires 6” minimum topsoil cover. Exception: Infiltration basins - see basin details for soil type). Multiple site visits will be required to accommodate permanent or temporary stabilization as required during the phases of construction. Refer to MnDOT Seeding Manual, Latest Edition for more details. 1) General Mix A.Seed: Mesic Inslope at a rate of 65 lb/acre B.Fertilizer: Type 1 20-10-20 NPK at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 1 at a rate of 2 tons/acre 2) Native Mix A.Seed: BWSR Mix 32-231 Mesic to Dry Prairie at a rate of 37.5 lb/acre B.Fertilizer: Type 1 20-10-20 NPK at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 3 at a rate of 2 tons/acre 3) Stormwater Basins/Wet Soils A.Seed: BWSR Mix 33-261 Stormwater at a rate of 35.0 lb/acre B.Fertilizer: Type 3 slow release 22-5-10 NPK at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 3 at a rate of 2 tons/acre 4) Temporary Cover Crop A.Seed: MNDOT Winter Wheat at a rate of 100.0 lb/acre B.Fertilizer: Type 1 20-10-20 NPK at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 1 at a rate of 2 tons/acre INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPs Routine Inspection 1.Rock Entrances - Inspect weekly. If rock becomes filled with sediment and tracked material to the extent the purpose ceases to function, remove the contaminated rock and replace with new rock. 2.Stabile Concrete Entrance - Inspect weekly. Remove dirt and debris and sweep regularly to control dust. 3.Silt fence - Inspect weekly, particularly for damaged sections, breaches, down-gradient areas, flow concentration points, scour areas and sections adjacent to sensitive areas. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity. 4.Sediment traps and basins - Inspect weekly. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity within 72 hours of discovery. 5.Inlet Protection - Inspect weekly or more frequently as needed after multiple rainfalls less than 0.5”. Verify intake capacity is not compromised. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity. 6.Slope - inspect steep slopes for rills and gullies, often forming after placement of topsoil, seed and erosion control blanket. As a guide, repair and re stabilize eroded areas where rills exceed 6” in depth. 7.Inspect other site-specific BMP's on a weekly basis minimum. Rain Event Inspection - Mandatory, within 24 hours after a rain event 0.5” or greater. Complete all items associated with Routine Inspection. Furthermore, inspect site for breaches, failures, scours and gullying. Take corrective actions as necessary to restore functionality to the BMP's. If a given situation is discovered to be prone to repetitive failure, advise the Engineer and Contractor for SWPPP and BMP amendments. ADDITIONAL SWPPP NOTES 1.All Erosion and Sediment Control facilities shall be maintained by the Contractor during the construction operations. Any temporary facilities which are to be removed as called for on these plans and specifications shall be removed by the Contractor at the time directed by the engineer. The Contractor shall then restore the subsequently disturbed areas in accordance with these plans and specifications. 2.Wherever practical and feasible, the Contractor shall protect and preserve existing natural trees, grass and other vegetative cover in effort to provide natural buffering and filtering of runoff. 3.Contractor shall be adaptable in adjusting construction schedules in anticipation of weather forecasts of precipitation, in order to minimize risk of erosion and sediment transport. 4.It is the responsibility of the Contractor to keep public streets, travel ways, parking lots and trails utilized for ingress to and egress from the construction site free of dirt, sediment and debris, resulting from construction activity. Cost for this shall be considered incidental to the contract. 5.Adequate control of dust shall be maintained by the Contractor. Cost for dust control shall be considered incidental to the contract. 6.Perimeter controls shall not be removed until final stabilization of areas draining toward the control devices. 7.When temperatures do not exceed 40° F, areas that require seed and mulch stabilization shall be dormant seeded. Application rate shall be two times the normal rate. No dormant seeding shall be done on ice or snow greater than 2” in depth. 8.Any areas that were seeded that do not achieve 70% coverage shall be reseeded at the Contractor's expense, where coverage limitation is caused by lack of seed germination and growth. STORMWATER BASIN MAINTENANCE All stormwater basins within the project will be owned and maintained by the City. Suggested practices are as follows: 1.For the first three years after construction, basins should be inspected for obvious signs of erosion, such as gullies, rills or sediment plumes. Identify the cause and take corrective measures such that grades are restored and surfaces re-established with appropriate vegetation. 2.During the first year after final stabilization, mow the slopes of stormwater basins, approximately 30-day intervals, 6”-8” high. Over-seed any areas not fully established. 3.Inspect for sediment accumulation at the pipe outlets into the pond at the completion of sod installation of last lot in plat. Remove sediment. Re-inspect every 3-5 years. 4.Inspect inlets and outlets for blockage or debris buildup annually. Remove debris as necessary to allow for inlets and outlets to function as designed. 5.Verify basin design capacity after 15 to 20 years of service. TURF AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE Year 1 a.Establishment (spring seeding) 1.Prepare site: Late April-May 2.Seed: April 15th - July 20th b.Maintenance 1.When vegetation reaches 10-14 inches tall, mow down to 6-8 inches. The site shall be mowed at least 3 times from the planting date until September 30th. Mowings will be approximately 30 days apart. 2.Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. c.Establishment (fall seeding) 1.Prepare site: Late August - early September 2.Seed: September 20th - October 20th 3.The following spring is Year 1 in the maintenance plan. d.Evaluation 1.Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings). 2.Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows. 3.Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall. 4.If there is a flush of growth from foxtail, etc., mow as necessary. Year 2 a.Maintenance: 1.When vegetation reaches 10-14 inches tall, mow down to 6-8 inches. The site shall be mowed twice between June 1st and July 31st. Mowings will be approximately 30 days apart. 2.Weed control - Mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles, etc. 1 time between August 1st and September 30th once vegetation has grown back after the second mowing. b.Evaluation 1.Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat is used in fall planting. 2.Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short. 3.Some flowers should be blooming (Black eyed Susans, Wild Bergamot, etc.) 4.If there is a flush of growth from foxtail, etc., mow site to a height of 6-8 inches. Year 3 a.Maintenance: 1.Spot spray perennial and first-year biennial weeds. Spot mow annual and second-year biennial weeds. Spot treatments must occur once every 3 to 5 weeks from June 1st to September 30th. At least three treatment cycles must be completed during this date window. Treatments must occur before weeds set seed. b.Evaluation: 2.Planting should begin to resemble a prairie, with tall grasses, flowers, etc. GENERAL PERMIT NOTE VISIT THE MPCA WEB SITE FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/business-with-us/construction-stormwater EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROLSWPPP NOTESKANARANZI LOAM HSG B MAYER SILT LOAM HSG X QUAM SILT LOAM HSG C/D CRYSTALL LAKE SILT LOAM HSG C WAUKEGAN SILT LOAM HSG B KANARANZI LOAM HSG B KANARANZI LOAM HSG B KANARANZI LOAM HSG B QUAM SILT LOAM HSG C/D Page 78 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282ERD.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282ERD C302 VUNEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROLNOTES1.1 Permit Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.2 This permit is required for construction activity that results in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre or if a project is part of a common plan of development or sale that ultimately will disturb greater than one (1) acre, and authorizes, subject to the terms and conditions of this permit, the discharge of stormwater associated with construction activity. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.3 Construction activity covered by this permit cannot commence until coverage under this permit is effective as described in item 3.3 through 3.4 or, if applicable, until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued an individual National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) construction stormwater permit for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.4 This permit covers all areas of the State of Minnesota except land wholly within the boundaries of a federally recognized Indian Reservation owned by a tribe or a tribal member or land held in trust by the federal government for a tribe or tribal member.[Minn. R. 7090] 1.5 Coverage under this permit is not required when all stormwater from construction activity is routed directly to and treated by a "treatment works," as defined in Minn. Stat. Section 115.01, subd. 21, operated under an individual NPDES/SDS permit with a Total Suspended Solids (TSS) effluent limit. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.6 This permit covers ongoing projects covered under any previous construction stormwater permit that are not complete on the issuance date of this permit. Permittees must either remain in compliance with the previous permit and terminate coverage within 18 months of the issuance date of this permit or comply with this permit, including updating the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), within the 18-month period. Permittees of previously permitted projects are not required to incorporate any additional requirements regarding the permanent stormwater treatment system included in this reissued permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.7 Coverage for projects that extend beyond the expiration date of this permit remains effective for a grace period of 18 months.If Permittees cannot complete projects during the grace period, the MPCA will extend coverage under the next permit and permittees must comply with the requirements of the new permit including updating the SWPPP. Permittees are not required to follow changes to the permanent stormwater treatment section of the next permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.1 Prohibitions and Limitations of Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.2 The owner must develop a complete and accurate SWPPP that complies with item 5.2 prior to submitting the application for coverage and starting construction activity. Failure to prepare a SWPPP prior to submitting the application may result in permit revocation. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.3 This permit prohibits discharges of any material other than stormwater treated in compliance with this permit and discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities in accordance with Section 10. Prohibited discharges include, but are not limited to, wastewater from washout of concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials, fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance, soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing and maintenance, and other hazardous substances or wastes. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.4 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges related to the placement of fill into waters of the state requiring local, state or federal authorizations (such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Work permits or local governmental unit (LGU) Wetland Conservation Act replacement plans or determinations). [Minn. R. 7090] 2.5 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity except for construction activity. Permittees must obtain coverage for discharges associated with industrial activity under a separate NPDES/SDS permit once day-to-day operational activities commence even if construction is ongoing. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.6 This permit does not authorize discharges from non-point source agricultural and silvicultural activities excluded from NPDES permit requirements under 40 CFR pt. 122.3(e). [Minn. R. 7090] 2.7 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges to Prohibited, Restricted, Special or Impaired waters unless permittees follow the additional stormwater requirements in Section 23. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.8 This permit does not replace or satisfy any environmental review requirements including those under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act or the National Environmental Policy Act. The owner must verify completion of any environmental review required by law, including any required Environmental Assessment Work Sheets or Environmental Impact Statements, Federal environmental review, or other required review prior to applying for coverage under this permit. If any part of your common plan of development or sale requires environmental review, coverage under this permit cannot be obtained until such environmental review is complete. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.9 This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for discharges adversely impacting State or Federally designated endangered or threatened species or a designated critical habitat. The owner must comply with the National Historic Preservation Act and conduct all required review and coordination related to historic preservation, including significant anthropological sites and any burial sites, with the Minnesota Historic Preservation Officer. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.10 This permit does not authorize discharges to wetlands unless the permittee complies with the requirements in Section 22. Coverage under this permit cannot be issued until the requirements for wetland permits, decisions, other determinations, or the mitigative sequence required in section 22 have been finalized and documented. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 3.1 Application and Coverage Effective Date. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.2 The owner and operator must submit a complete and accurate on-line application with the appropriate fee to the MPCA for each project that disturbs one (1) or more acres of land or for a common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one (1) or more acres. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.3 For projects or common plans of development or sale that disturb less than 50 acres or do not discharge stormwater within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of a special or impaired water, permittees do not need to submit the SWPPP with the application. Permit coverage for these projects is effective upon application and completing the payment process. [Minn. R.7090] 3.4 For certain projects or common plans of development or sale disturbing 50 acres or more, the complete SWPPP must be included with the application and submitted at least 30 days before the start of construction activity. This applies if there is a discharge point on the project within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to, a special water listed in item 23.3 through 23.6 or an impaired water as described in item 23.7. Permit coverage for these projects is effective upon submitting the application and complete SWPPP, completing the payment process and receiving a determination from the MPCA that the review of the SWPPP is complete. The determination may take longer than 30 days if the SWPPP is incomplete. If the MPCA fails to contact the permittees within 30 days of application receipt, coverage is effective 30 days after completing the payment process. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.5 The application requires listing all persons meeting the definition of owner and operator as permittees. The owner is responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit. The operator is responsible for compliance with Sections 3, 4, 6-22, 24 and applicable requirements for construction activity in Section 23. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.6 Permittees will receive coverage notification in a manner determined by the MPCA. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.7 For construction projects where the owner or operator changes (e.g., an original developer sells portions of the property to various homebuilders or sells the entire site to a new owner), the current owner and the new owner or operator must submit a complete permit modification form provided by the MPCA. The current owner and the new owner or operator must submit the form prior to the new owner or operator commencing construction activity or no later than 30 days after taking ownership of the property. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.8 For construction projects where the owner or operator changes, the current owner must provide a SWPPP to the new owner and operator that specifically addresses the remaining construction activity. The new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP, modify the SWPPP, or develop a new SWPPP. Permittees must ensure their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs ineffective. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.1 Termination of Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.2 Permittees must submit a NOT within 30 days after all termination conditions listed in Section 13 are complete.[Minn. R. 7090] 4.3 Permittees must submit a NOT within 30 days after selling or otherwise legally transferring the entire site, including permit responsibility for roads (e.g., street sweeping) and stormwater infrastructure final clean out, or transferring portions of a site to another party. The permittees' coverage under this permit terminates at midnight on the submission date of the NOT.[Minn. R. 7090] 4.4 Permittees may terminate permit coverage prior to completion of all construction activity if they meet all of the following conditions: a.construction activity has ceased for at least 90 days; and b.at least 90 percent (by area) of all originally proposed construction activity has been completed and permanent cover has been established on those areas; and c.on areas where construction activity is not complete, permanent cover has been established; and d.the site complies with item 13.3 through 13.7. After permit coverage is terminated under this item, any subsequent development on the remaining portions of the site will require permit coverage if the subsequent development itself or as part of the remaining common plan of development or sale will result in land disturbing activities of one (1) or more acres in size. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.5 Permittees may terminate coverage upon MPCA approval after submitting information documenting the owner cancelled the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Content. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.2 The owner must develop and implement a SWPPP. The SWPPP must include items 5.3 through 5.26. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.3 The SWPPP must incorporate specific Best Management Practices (BMP) used to comply with the requirements of this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.4 The SWPPP must include a narrative describing the timing for installation of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and a description of the permanent stormwater treatment systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.5 The SWPPP must include the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs along with procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary for the site conditions during construction. Standard details and/or specifications for BMPs must be included in the final plans and specifications for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.6 The SWPPP must include the calculations and other information used for the design of temporary sediment basins and any of the permanent stormwater treatment systems required in Section 15. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.7 The SWPPP must include estimated quantities anticipated at the start of the project for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (e.g., linear feet of silt fence or square feet of erosion control blanket). [Minn. R. 7090] 5.8 The SWPPP must include the number of acres of impervious surface for both pre- and post-construction. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.9 The SWPPP must include a site map with existing and final grades, including drainage area boundaries, directions of flow and all discharge points where stormwater is leaving the site or entering a surface water. The site map must indicate the areas of steep slopes. The site map must also include impervious surfaces, soil types and locations of potential pollutant- generating activities as identified in Section 12. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.10 The SWPPP must include a map of all surface waters, existing wetlands, and stormwater ponds or basins that can be identified on maps such as United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle maps, the National Wetland Inventory map or equivalent maps and are within one mile (aerial radius measurement) from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater from the construction site, during or after construction. The SWPPP must identify if the surface waters are special or impaired waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.11 The SWPPP must include a site map showing construction activity areas that are adjacent to and drain to Public Waters for which the DNR has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.12 Permittees must identify locations of 50' buffer zones as required in item 9.17 and 100' permanent buffer zones as required in item 23.11, on plan sheets in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.13 If permittees determine compliance with the following requirements is infeasible, they must document the determination in the SWPPP: a.temporary sediment basins as described in Section 14; and b.for linear projects, if the permanent stormwater treatment system cannot be constructed within the right-of-way, a reasonable attempt must be made to obtain additional right-of-way (item 15.9); and c.buffer zones as described in item 9.17 and item 23.11. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.14 If permittees determine that a temporary sediment basin is infeasible as described in item 14.10, the SWPPP must describe the alternative BMPs used. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.15 Where systems cannot meet the full volume reduction requirement on-site, (e.g., the site has infiltration prohibitions, see item 16.14 through item 16.21) the permittee must document the reasons in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.16 The SWPPP must include any stormwater mitigation measures proposed to be part of the final project in any environmental review document, endangered species review, archeological or other required local, state or federal review conducted for the project. For purposes of this permit, mitigation measures mean actions necessary to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for impacts related to erosion prevention, sediment control, the permanent stormwater treatment system, pollution prevention management measures and discharges associated with the project's construction activity. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.17 The SWPPP must describe the methods used for permanent cover of all exposed soil areas. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.18 Permittees must identify the locations of areas where construction will be phased to minimize the duration of exposed soil areas in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.19 For projects with a discharge point on the project within one (1) mile (aerial radius measurement) of and which flows to an impaired water, permittees must identify the impaired water(s), and any United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the pollutant(s) or stressor(s) described in item 23.7. Permittees' identification must include those TMDLs approved at any time prior to permit application submittal and are still in effect. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.20 Permittees must document in the SWPPP, all trained individuals identified in item 21.2. Documentation must include: a.names of personnel required to be trained; and b.dates of training and name of instructor(s) and entity providing training; and c.content of training course. If permittees do not know the names of the individuals at the time of application, the permittees must ensure they document training before construction activity commences. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.21 The SWPPP must identify a person knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs who will coordinate with all contractors, subcontractors, and operators on-site to oversee the implementation of the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.22 The SWPPP must describe any specific chemicals and chemical treatment systems used for enhancing the sedimentation process and how it achieves compliance with item 9.19. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.23 The SWPPP must identify the person(s), organizations, or entities responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of permanent stormwater treatment systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.24 The SWPPP must describe methods to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil. Minimizing soil compaction is not required where the function of a specific area dictates compaction. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.25 The SWPPP must include any site assessments for groundwater or soil contamination required in item 16.15.[Minn. R. 7090] 5.26 The SWPPP must account for the following factors in designing temporary erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs: a.the expected amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation; and b.the nature of stormwater runoff and run-on at the site, including factors such as expected flow from impervious surfaces, slopes, and site drainage features; and c.the stormwater volume, velocity, and peak flowrates to minimize discharge of pollutants in stormwater and to minimize channel and streambank erosion and scour in the immediate vicinity of discharge points; and d.the range of soil particle sizes expected to be present. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.1 SWPPP Amendments. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.2 One of the individuals described in item 21.2.a or item 21.2.b or another qualified individual must complete all SWPPP changes. Changes involving the use of a less stringent BMP must include a justification describing how the replacement BMP is effective for the site characteristics. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.3 Permittees must amend the SWPPP within 7 days to include additional or modified BMPs whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions having a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.4 Permittees must amend the SWPPP within 7 days to include additional or modified BMPs whenever inspections or investigations by the site owner or operator, USEPA or MPCA officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater or the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances (e.g., nuisance conditions as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2) or the SWPPP is not consistent with the objectives of a USEPA approved TMDL. [Minn. R. 7050.0210] 7.1 BMP Selection and Stormwater Management. [Minn. R. 7090] 7.2 Permittees must select, install, and maintain the BMPs identified in the SWPPP and in this permit in an appropriate and functional manner and in accordance with relevant manufacturer specifications and accepted engineering practices to minimize the discharge of pollutants in stormwater from construction activities. Examples of stormwater management practices for this section include but are not limited to wet sedimentation basins, temporary depressions to hold stormwater, stormwater routing, dikes, berms, pumping, and stormwater treatment BMPs. Permittees must phase and incorporate stormwater management principles as the construction progresses. Unless infeasible, temporary or permanent wet sedimentation basins (when required, see section 14 and 15) should be constructed as a first step in the process and stormwater routed to these. [Minn. R. 7090] 7.3 Permittees must not disturb more land (i.e., phasing) than can be effectively inspected and maintained in accordance with Section 11. [Minn. R. 7090] 7.4 If permittees will be using some type of erosion control netting on the site as part of the soil stabilization techniques, permittees are encouraged to use products that have been shown to minimize impacts on wildlife. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service recommends using types of netting practices that are considered "wildlife friendly," including those that use natural fiber or 100 percent biodegradable materials and that use a loose weave with a non-welded, movable jointed netting. Products that are not wildlife friendly include square plastic netting that are degradable (e.g., photodegradable, UV- degradable, oxo-degradable), netting made from polypropylene, nylon, polyethylene, or polyester. Other recommendations include removing the netting product when it is no longer needed. More information may be found at: https://www.fws.gov/initiative/protecting-wildlife/make-change-wildlife-friendly-erosion-control-products. There also may be State, Tribal, or local requirements about using wildlife friendly erosion control products. See Minnesota Department of Transportation requirements at: https://www.mndot.org/environment/erosion/rolled-erosion-prevention-products.html. [Minn. R. 7050] 8.1 Erosion Prevention Practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.2 Before work begins, permittees must delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.3 Permittees must minimize the need for disturbance of portions of the project with steep slopes. When steep slopes must be disturbed, permittees must use techniques such as phasing and stabilization practices designed for steep slopes (e.g., slope draining and terracing). [Minn. R. 7090] 8.4 Permittees must stabilize all exposed soil areas, including stockpiles. Stabilization must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion when construction activity has permanently or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 calendar days (7 days for sites discharging to special or impaired waters, see section 24). Stabilization must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the construction activity has ceased. Stabilization is not required on constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces. Stabilization is not required on temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) but permittees must provide sediment controls at the base of the stockpile. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.5 For Public Waters that the Minnesota DNR has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames, permittees must complete stabilization of all exposed soil areas within 200 feet of the water's edge, and that drain to these waters, within 24 hours during the restriction period. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.6 Permittees must stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of the last 200 linear feet of temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales that drain water from the site within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water or property edge. Permittees must complete stabilization of remaining portions of temporary or permanent ditches or swales within 14 calendar days (7 days for sites discharging to special or impaired waters, see section 24) after connecting to a surface water or property edge and construction in that portion of the ditch temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.7 Temporary or permanent ditches or swales being used as a sediment containment system during construction (with properly designed rock-ditch checks, bio rolls, silt dikes, etc.) do not need to be stabilized. Permittees must stabilize these areas within 24 hours after their use as a sediment containment system ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.8 Permittees must not use mulch, hydromulch, tackifier, polyacrylamide or similar erosion prevention practices within any portion of the normal wetted perimeter of a temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale section with a continuous slope of greater than 2 percent. Examples of acceptable erosion prevention practices include blankets, poly, riprap, etc. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.9 Permittees must provide temporary or permanent energy dissipation at all pipe outlets within 24 hours after connection to a surface water or permanent stormwater treatment system. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.1 Sediment Control Practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.2 Permittees must establish sediment control BMPs on all downgradient perimeters of the site and downgradient areas of the site that drain to any surface water, including curb and gutter systems. Permittees must locate sediment control practices upgradient of any buffer zones. Permittees must install sediment control practices before any upgradient land-disturbing activities begin and must keep the sediment control practices in place until they establish permanent cover. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.3 If downgradient sediment controls are overloaded, based on frequent failure or excessive maintenance requirements, permittees must install additional upgradient sediment control practices or redundant BMPs to eliminate the overloading and amend the SWPPP to identify these additional practices as required in item 6.3. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.4 Temporary or permanent drainage ditches and sediment basins designed as part of a sediment containment system (e.g., ditches with rock-check dams) require sediment control practices only as appropriate for site conditions. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.5 A floating silt curtain placed in the water is not a sediment control BMP to satisfy item 9.2 except when working on a shoreline or below the waterline. Immediately after the construction activity (e.g., installation of rip rap along the shoreline) in that area is complete, permittees must install an upland perimeter control practice if exposed soils still drain to a surface water.[Minn. R. 7090] 9.6 Permittees must re-install all sediment control practices adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activities such as clearing or grubbing, or passage of vehicles, immediately after the short-term activity is completed. Permittees must re- install sediment control practices before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.7 Permittees must protect all storm drain inlets using appropriate BMPs during construction until they establish permanent cover on all areas with potential for discharging to the inlet. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.8 Permittees may remove inlet protection for a particular inlet if a specific safety concern (e.g. street flooding/freezing) is identified by the permittees or the jurisdictional authority (e.g., city/county/township/Minnesota Department of Transportation engineer). Permittees must document the need for removal in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.9 Permittees must provide silt fence or other effective sediment controls at the base of stockpiles on the downgradient perimeter prior to the initiation of stockpiling. Sediment controls must be managed in accordance with section 9.6. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.10 Permittees must locate stockpiles outside of natural buffers or surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.11 Permittees must install a vehicle tracking BMP to minimize the track out of sediment from the construction site or onto paved roads within the site. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.12 Permittees must use street sweeping in addition to vehicle tracking BMPs if vehicle tracking BMPs alone are not adequate to prevent sediment tracking onto the street. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.13 Permittees must install temporary sediment basins as required in Section 14. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.14 In any areas of the site where final vegetative stabilization will occur, permittees must restrict vehicle and equipment use to minimize soil compaction. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.15 Permittees must preserve topsoil on the site, unless infeasible. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.16 Permittees must direct discharges from BMPs to vegetated areas unless infeasible. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.17 Permittees must preserve a 50-foot natural buffer or, if a buffer is infeasible on the site, provide redundant (double) perimeter sediment controls when a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbances and stormwater flows to the surface water. Permittees must install perimeter sediment controls at least 5 feet apart unless limited by lack of available space. Natural buffers are not required adjacent to road ditches, judicial ditches, county ditches, stormwater conveyance channels, storm drain inlets, and sediment basins. If preserving the buffer is infeasible, permittees must document the reasons in the SWPPP. Sheet piling and other impermeable barriers installed in a manner that retains all stormwater are considered redundant perimeter control. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.18 Any sediment control made of soil must be temporarily or permanently stabilized within 24 hours. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.19 Permittees must use polymers, flocculants, or other sedimentation treatment chemicals in accordance with accepted engineering practices, dosing specifications and sediment removal design specifications provided by the manufacturer or supplier. The permittees must use conventional erosion and sediment controls prior to chemical addition and must direct treated stormwater to a sediment control system for filtration or settlement of the floc prior to discharge. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.1 Dewatering and Basin Draining. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.2 Permittees must not cause nuisance conditions (see Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2) in surface waters from dewatering and basin draining (e.g., pumped discharges, trench/ditch cuts for drainage) discharges. Permittees must discharge turbid or sediment-laden waters related to dewatering or basin draining to a sediment control (e.g. sediment trap or basin, filter bag) designed to prevent discharges with visual turbidity. To the extent feasible, use well-vegetated (e.g., grassy or wooded), upland areas of the site to infiltrate dewatering water before discharge. Permittees are prohibited from using receiving waters as part of the treatment area. Permittees must visually check and photograph the discharge at the beginning and at least once every 24 hours of operation to ensure adequate treatment has been obtained and nuisance conditions will not result from the discharge. [Minn. R. 7050.0210] 10.3 If nuisance conditions result from the discharge, Permittees must cease dewatering immediately and corrective actions must occur before dewatering is resumed. Nuisance conditions includes, but is not limited to, a sediment plume in the discharge or the discharge appears cloudy, or opaque, or has a visible contrast, or has a visible oil film, or has aquatic habitat degradation that can be identified by an observer. [Minn. R. 7050.0210] 10.4 If permittees must discharge water containing oil or grease, they must use an oil-water separator or suitable filtration device (e.g., cartridge filters, absorbents pads) prior to discharge. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.5 Permittees must discharge all water from dewatering or basin-draining activities in a manner that does not cause erosion or scour in the immediate vicinity of discharge points or inundation of wetlands in the immediate vicinity of discharge points that causes significant adverse impact to the wetland. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.6 If permittees use filters with backwash water, they must haul the backwash water away for disposal, return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not cause erosion. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.1 Inspections and Maintenance. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.2 Permittees must ensure a trained person, as identified in item 21.2.b, will inspect the entire construction site at least once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 1/2 inch in 24 hours. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.3 Permittees must inspect and maintain all permanent stormwater treatment BMPs. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.4 Permittees must inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and Pollution Prevention Management Measures to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Permittees must repair, replace or supplement all nonfunctional BMPs with functional BMPs by the end of the next business day after discovery unless another time frame is specified in item 11.5 or 11.6.Permittees may take additional time if field conditions prevent access to the area. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.5 During each inspection, permittees must inspect areas adjacent to the project, surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems but not curb and gutter systems, for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. Permittees must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in areas adjacent to the project, surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems and restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Permittees must complete removal and stabilization within seven (7) calendar days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. Permittees must use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of obtaining access. Permittees are responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work in surface waters.[Minn. R. 7090] 11.6 Permittees must inspect construction site vehicle exit locations, streets and curb and gutter systems within and adjacent to the project for sedimentation from erosion or tracked sediment from vehicles. Permittees must remove sediment from all paved surfaces within one (1) calendar day of discovery or, if applicable, within a shorter time to avoid a safety hazard to users of public streets. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.7 Permittees must repair, replace or supplement all perimeter control devices when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/2 of the height of the device. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.8 Permittees must drain temporary and permanent sedimentation basins and remove the sediment when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume within 72 hours of discovery. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.9 Permittee's must inspect and photograph dewatering discharges at the beginning and at least once every 24 hours during operation. Dewatering discharges that only last for minutes, as opposed to hours, and do not reach a surface water, do not require photographs or documentation. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.10 Permittees must ensure that at least one individual present on the site (or available to the project site in three (3) calendar days) is trained in the job duties described in item 21.2.b. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.11 Permittees may adjust the inspection schedule described in item 11.2 as follows: a.inspections of areas with permanent cover can be reduced to once per month, even if construction activity continues on other portions of the site; or b.where sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, inspections can be reduced to once per month and, after 12 months, may be suspended completely until construction activity resumes. The MPCA may require inspections to resume if conditions warrant; or c.where construction activity has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, inspections may be suspended. Inspections must resume within 24 hours of runoff occurring, or upon resuming construction, whichever comes first. d.for projects where a pollinator habitat or native prairie type vegetated cover is being established, inspections may be reduced to once per month if the site has temporary vegetation with a density of 70% temporary uniform cover. If after 24 months no significant erosion problems are observed, inspections may be suspended completely until the termination requirements in section 13 have been met. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.12 Permittees must record all inspections and maintenance activities within 24 hours of being conducted and these records must be retained with the SWPPP. These records must include: a.date and time of inspections; and b.name of persons conducting inspections; and c.accurate findings of inspections, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed; and d.corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities); and e.date of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inches in 24 hours, and the amount of rainfall for each event. Permittees must obtain rainfall amounts by either a properly maintained rain gauge installed on-site, a weather station that is within one (1) mile of your location, or a weather reporting system that provides site specific rainfall data from radar summaries; and f.if permittees observe a discharge during the inspection, they must record and should photograph and describe the location of the discharge (i.e., color, odor, settled or suspended solids, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants); and g.any amendments to the SWPPP proposed as a result of the inspection must be documented as required in Section 6 within seven (7) calendar days; and h.all photographs of dewatering activities and documentation of nuisance conditions resulting from dewatering activities as described in section 10. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.1 Pollution Prevention Management Measures. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.2 Permittees must place construction materials and landscape materials under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary days)or protect them by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. Permittees are not required to cover or protect products which are either not a source of contamination to stormwater or are designed to be exposed to stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.3 Permittees must place pesticides, fertilizers and treatment chemicals under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) or protect them by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.4 Permittees must store hazardous materials and toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.5 Permittees must properly store, collect and dispose solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. [Minn. R. 7035] 12.6 Permittees must position portable toilets so they are secure and will not tip or be knocked over. Permittees must properly dispose sanitary waste in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. [Minn. R. 7041] 12.7 Permittees must take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. Permittees must ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. Permittees must report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. [Minn. Stat. 115.061] 12.8 Permittees must limit vehicle exterior washing and equipment to a defined area of the site. Permittees must contain runoff from the washing area in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and must dispose waste from the washing activity properly. Permittees must properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.9 Permittees must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (e.g., concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. Permittees must prevent liquid and solid washout wastes from contacting the ground and must design the containment so it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Permittees must properly dispose liquid and solid wastes in compliance with MPCA rules. Permittees must install a sign indicating the location of the washout facility. [Minn. R. 7035, Minn. R. 7090] 13.1 Permit Termination Conditions. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.2 Permittees must complete all construction activity and must install permanent cover over all areas prior to submitting the NOT. Vegetative cover must consist of a uniform perennial vegetation with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth Vegetation is not required where the function of a specific area dictates no vegetation, such as impervious surfaces or the base of a sand filter. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.3 Permittees must clean the permanent stormwater treatment system of any accumulated sediment and must ensure the system meets all applicable requirements in Section 15 through 19 and is operating as designed. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.4 Permittees must remove all sediment from conveyance systems prior to submitting the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.5 Permittees must remove all temporary synthetic erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs prior to submitting the NOT.Permittees may leave BMPs designed to decompose on-site in place. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.6 For residential construction only, permit coverage terminates on individual lots if the lot is sold to the homeowner, structures are finished, and permanent cover has been established. For lots that are sold to the homeowner where permanent cover has not been established, coverage terminates if temporary erosion prevention and downgradient perimeter control is properly installed and the permittee distributes the MPCA's "Homeowner Fact Sheet" to the homeowner. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.7 For construction projects on agricultural land (e.g., pipelines across cropland), permittees must return the disturbed land to its preconstruction agricultural use prior to submitting the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.8 When submitting the NOT, Permittees must include either ground or aerial photographs showing the requirements of 13.2 have been met. Permittees are not required to take photographs of every distinct part of the site, however the conditions portrayed must be substantially similar to those areas that are not photographed. Photographs must be clear and in focus and must include the date the photo was taken. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.1 Temporary Sediment Basins. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.2 Where ten (10) or more acres of disturbed soil (5 acres for sites discharging to special or impaired waters, see section 24) drain to a common location, permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin to provide treatment of the runoff before it leaves the construction site or enters surface waters. Permittees may convert a temporary sediment basin to a permanent basin after construction is complete. The temporary basin is no longer required when permanent cover has reduced the acreage of disturbed soil to less than ten (10) acres draining to a common location. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.3 The temporary basin must provide live storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a two (2)-year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin or 1,800 cubic feet of live storage per acre drained, whichever is greater. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.4 Where permittees have not calculated the two (2)-year, 24-hour storm runoff amount, the temporary basin must provide 3,600 cubic feet of live storage per acre of the basins' drainage area. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.5 Permittees must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.6 Permittees must design the outlet structure to withdraw water from the surface to minimize the discharge of pollutants. Permittees may temporarily suspend the use of a surface withdrawal mechanism during frozen conditions. The basin must include a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.7 Permittees must provide energy dissipation for the basin outlet within 24 hours after connection to a surface water. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.8 Permittees must locate temporary basins outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required in item 23.11.[Minn. R. 7090] 14.9 Permittees must construct the temporary basins prior to disturbing 10 or more acres of soil draining to a common location. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.10 Where a temporary sediment basin meeting the requirements of item 14.3 through 14.9 is infeasible, permittees must install effective sediment controls such as smaller sediment basins and/or sediment traps, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips or any appropriate combination of measures as dictated by individual site conditions. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is infeasible, permittees must consider public safety and may consider factors such as site soils, slope, and available area on-site. Permittees must document this determination of infeasibility in the SWPPP.[Minn. R. 7090] 15.1 Permanent Stormwater Treatment System. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.2 Permittees must design and implement the project so all stormwater discharged from the project during and after construction activities does not cause a violation of state water quality standards, including nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or a significant adverse impact to wetlands caused by inundation or decrease of flow. [Minn. R. 7090] NPDES REQUIREMENTS 15.3 Permittees must design and construct a permanent stormwater treatment system to treat the water quality volume if the project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces creating a net increase of one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.4 Permittees must calculate the water quality volume as one (1) inch times the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.5 Permittees must first consider volume reduction practices on-site (e.g., infiltration or other) when designing the permanent stormwater treatment system. If this permit prohibits infiltration as described in item 16.14 through item 16.21, permittees may consider a wet sedimentation basin, filtration basin or regional pond. This permit does not consider wet sedimentation basins and filtration systems to be volume reduction practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.6 For projects where the full volume reduction requirement cannot be met on-site, (e.g., the site has infiltration prohibitions), permittees must document the reasons in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.7 Permittees must discharge the water quality volume to a permanent stormwater treatment system prior to discharge to a surface water. For purposes of this item, surface waters do not include man-made drainage systems that convey stormwater to a permanent stormwater treatment system. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.8 Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater treatment practices required by Sections 15 through 19, permittees must install other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.9 For linear projects where permittees cannot treat the entire water quality volume within the existing right-of-way, permittees must make a reasonable attempt to obtain additional right-of-way, easement or other permission for stormwater treatment during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP. Permittees must still consider volume reduction practices first as described in item 15.5. If permittees cannot obtain additional right-of-way, easement or other permission, they must maximize the treatment of the water quality volume prior to discharge to surface waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.1 Infiltration Systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.2 Infiltration options include, but are not limited to: infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, bioretention areas without underdrains, swales with impermeable check dams, and natural depressions. If permittees utilize an infiltration system to meet the requirements of this permit, they must incorporate the design parameters in item 16.3 through item 16.21. Permittees must follow the infiltration prohibition in item 16.14 anytime an infiltration system is designed, including those not required by this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.3 Permittees must design infiltration systems such that pre-existing hydrologic conditions of wetlands in the vicinity are not impacted (e.g., inundation or breaching a perched water table supporting a wetland). [Minn. R. 7090] 16.4 Permittees must not excavate infiltration systems to final grade, or within three (3) feet of final grade, until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized unless they provide rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the infiltration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.5 When excavating an infiltration system to within three (3) feet of final grade, permittees must stake off and mark the area so heavy construction vehicles or equipment do not compact the soil in the infiltration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.6 Permittees must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, forebay, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to remove solids, floating materials, and oil and grease from the runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, before the system routes stormwater to the infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.7 Permittees must design infiltration systems to provide a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.8 Permittees must design the infiltration system to discharge all stormwater (including stormwater in excess of the water quality volume) routed to the system through the uppermost soil surface or engineered media surface within 48 hours. Permittees must route additional flows that cannot infiltrate within 48 hours to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.9 Permittees must provide a means to visually verify the infiltration system is discharging through the soil surface or filter media surface within 48 hours or less. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.10 Permittees must provide at least one soil boring, test pit or infiltrometer test in the location of the infiltration practice for determining infiltration rates. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.11 For design purposes, permittees must divide field measured infiltration rates by 2 as a safety factor or permittees can use soil-boring results with the infiltration rate chart in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual to determine design infiltration rates.When soil borings indicate type A soils, permittees should perform field measurements to verify the rate is not above 8.3 inches per hour. This permit prohibits infiltration if the field measured infiltration rate is above 8.3 inches per hour. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.12 Permittees must employ appropriate on-site testing to ensure a minimum of three (3) feet of separation from the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.13 Permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.14 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems that receive runoff from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas including construction of infiltration systems not required by this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.15 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems where infiltrating stormwater may mobilize high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater. Permittees must either complete the MPCA's contamination screening checklist or conduct their own assessment to determine the suitability for infiltration. Permittees must retain the checklist or assessment with the SWPPP. For more information and to access the MPCA's "contamination screening checklist" see the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.16 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas where soil infiltration rates are field measured at more than 8.3 inches per hour unless they amend soils to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.17 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas with less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of bedrock. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.18 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas of predominately Hydrologic Soil Group type D soils (clay). [Minn. R. 7090] 16.19 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13, if the system will be located: a.in an Emergency Response Area (ERA) within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability as defined by the Minnesota Department of Health; or b.in an ERA within a DWSMA classified as moderate vulnerability unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a higher level of engineering review sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater; or c.outside of an ERA within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability, unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a higher level of engineering review sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater. See "higher level of engineering review" in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for more information. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.20 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst features. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.21 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas that receive runoff from the following industrial facilities not authorized to infiltrate stormwater under the NPDES stormwater permit for industrial activities: wood preserving facilities; automobile salvage yards; scrap recycling and waste recycling facilities; hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities; or air transportation facilities that conduct deicing activities. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.1 Filtration Systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.2 Filtration options include but are not limited to: sand filters with underdrains, biofiltration areas, swales using underdrains with impermeable check dams and underground sand filters. If permittees utilize a filtration system to meet the permanent stormwater treatment requirements of this permit, they must comply with items 17.3 through 17.11. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.3 Permittees must not install filter media until they construct and fully stabilize the contributing drainage area unless they provide rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the filtration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.4 Permittees must design filtration systems to remove at least 80 percent of TSS. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.5 Permittees must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, water quality inlet, forebay or hydrodynamic separator to remove settleable solids, floating materials, and oils and grease from the runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, before runoff enters the filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.6 Permittees must design filtration systems to treat a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.7 Permittees must design the filtration system to discharge all stormwater (including stormwater in excess of the water quality volume) routed to the system through the uppermost soil surface or engineered media surface within 48 hours. Additional flows that the system cannot filter within 48 hours must bypass the system or discharge through an emergency overflow. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.8 Permittees must design the filtration system to provide a means to visually verify the system is discharging through the soil surface or filter media within 48 hours. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.9 Permittees must employ appropriate on-site testing to ensure a minimum of three (3) feet of separation between the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.10 Permittees must ensure that filtration systems with less than three (3) feet of separation between seasonally saturated soils or from bedrock are constructed with an impermeable liner. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.11 The permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.1 Wet Sedimentation Basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.2 Permittees using a wet sedimentation basin to meet the permanent stormwater treatment requirements of this permit must incorporate the design parameters in item 18.3 through 18.10. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.3 Permittees must design the basin to have a permanent volume of 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The basin's permanent volume must reach a minimum depth of at least three (3) feet and must have no depth greater than 10 feet. Permittees must configure the basin to minimize scour or resuspension of solids. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.4 Permittees must design the basin to provide live storage for a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase in impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.5 Permittees must design basin outlets so the water quality volume discharges at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre of surface area of the basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.6 Permittees must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.7 Permittees must design the basin to include a stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.8 Permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.9 Permittees must locate basins outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required in item 23.11. Permittees must design basins to avoid draining water from wetlands unless the impact to the wetland complies with the requirements of Section 22. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.10 Permittees must design basins using an impermeable liner if located within active karst terrain. [Minn. R. 7090] 19.1 Regional Wet Sedimentation Basins. [Minn. R. 7090] 19.2 When the entire water quality volume cannot be treated by volume reduction practices on-site, permittees can use or create regional wet sedimentation basins provided they are constructed basins, not a natural wetland or water body, (wetlands used as regional basins must be mitigated for, see Section 22). The owner must ensure the regional basin conforms to all requirements for a wet sedimentation basin as described in items 18.3 through 18.10 and must be large enough to account for the entire area that drains to the regional basin. Permittees must verify that the regional basin will discharge at no more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the basin and must provide a live storage volume of one-inch times all the impervious area draining to the basin. Permittees cannot significantly degrade waterways between the project and the regional basin. The owner must obtain written authorization from the applicable LGU or private entity that owns and maintains the regional basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 20.1 SWPPP Availability. [Minn. R. 7090] 20.2 Permittees must keep the SWPPP on-site, or electronically available on-site, during normal working hours with personnel who have operational control over the applicable portion of the site, including all changes to the SWPPP, inspections, and maintenance records. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.1 Training Requirements. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.2 Permittees must ensure all of the following individuals receive training and the content and extent of the training is commensurate with the individual's job duties and responsibilities with regard to activities covered under this permit: a.Individuals preparing the SWPPP for the project. b.Individuals overseeing implementation of, revising and/or amending the SWPPP and individuals performing inspections for the project. One of these individuals must be available for an on-site inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. c.Individuals performing or supervising the installation, maintenance and repair of BMPs. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.3 Permittees must ensure individuals identified in Section 21 receive training from local, state, federal agencies, professional organizations, or other entities with expertise in erosion prevention, sediment control, permanent stormwater treatment and the Minnesota NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit. Permittees must ensure these individuals attend a refresher-training course every three (3) years. [Minn. R. 7090] 22.1 Requirements for Discharges to Wetlands. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 22.2 If the project has any discharges with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland, (e.g., conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond) permittees must demonstrate that the wetland mitigative sequence has been followed in accordance with items 22.3 or 22.4. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 22.3 If the potential adverse impacts to a wetland on a specific project site are addressed by permits or other approvals from an official statewide program (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act) that are issued specifically for the project and project site, permittees may use the permit, decision or other determination issued by these agencies to show the potential adverse impacts are addressed. For purposes of this permit, deminimus actions are determinations by the permitting agency that address the project impacts, whereas a non-jurisdictional determination does not address project impacts. [Minn. R. 7090] 22.4 If there are impacts from the project not addressed in one of the permits, decisions or other determinations discussed in item 22.3 (e.g., permanent inundation or flooding of the wetland, significant degradation of water quality, excavation, filling, draining), permittees must minimize all adverse impacts to wetlands by utilizing appropriate measures. Permittees must use measures based on the nature of the wetland, its vegetative community types and the established hydrology. These measures include in order of preference: a.avoid all significant adverse impacts to wetlands from the project and post-project discharge; b.minimize any unavoidable impacts from the project and post-project discharge; c.provide compensatory mitigation when the permittees determine(s) that there is no reasonable and practicable alternative to having a significant adverse impact on a wetland. For compensatory mitigation, wetland restoration or creation must be of the same type, size and whenever reasonable and practicable in the same watershed as the impacted wetland. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 23.1 Additional Requirements for Discharges to Special (Prohibited, Restricted, Other) and Impaired Waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.2 The BMPs identified for each special or impaired water are required for those areas of the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of special or impaired water and flows to that special or impaired water. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.3 Discharges to the following special waters identified as Prohibited in Minn. R. 7050.0335 subp. 3 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10, 23.11, 23.13 and 23.14: a.Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageurs National Park; Kettle River from the site of the former dam at Sandstone to its confluence with the Saint Croix River; Rum River from Ogechie Lake spillway to the northernmost confluence with Lake Onamia. b.Those portions of Lake Superior North of latitude 47 degrees, 57 minutes, 13 seconds, East of Hat Point, South of the Minnesota-Ontario boundary, and West of the Minnesota-Michigan boundary; c.Scientific and Natural Areas identified as in Minn. R. 7050.0335 Subp. 3: Boot Lake, Anoka County; Kettle River in sections 15, 22, 23, T 41 N, R 20, Pine County; Pennington Bog, Beltrami County; Purvis Lake-Ober Foundation, Saint Louis County; waters within the borders of Itasca Wilderness Sanctuary, Clearwater County; Iron Springs Bog, Clearwater County; Wolsfeld Woods, Hennepin County; Green Water Lake, Becker County; Blackdog Preserve, Dakota County; Prairie Bush Clover, Jackson County; Black Lake Bog, Pine County; Pembina Trail Preserve, Polk County; and Falls Creek, Washington County. [Minn. R. 7050.0335, subp. 3] 23.4 Discharges to the following special waters identified as Restricted in Minn. R. 7050.0335 subp.1 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10 and 23.11: a.Lake Superior, except those portions identified as prohibited in item 23.3.b; b.Mississippi River in those portions from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated February 12, 1981; c.Scenic or Recreational River Segments: Saint Croix River, entire length; Cannon River from northern city limits of Faribault to its confluence with the Mississippi River; North Fork of the Crow River from Lake Koronis outlet to the Meeker-Wright county line; Kettle River from north Pine County line to the site of the former dam at Sandstone; Minnesota River from Lac que Parle dam to Redwood County State Aid Highway 11; Mississippi River from County State Aid Highway 7 bridge in Saint Cloud to northwestern city limits of Anoka; and Rum River from State Highway 27 bridge in Onamia to Madison and Rice streets in Anoka; d.Lake Trout Lakes identified in Minn. R. 7050.0335 including lake trout lakes inside the boundaries of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park; e.Calcareous Fens listed in Minn. R. 7050.0335, subp. 1. [Minn. R. 7050.0335, subp. 1] 23.5 Discharges to the Trout Lakes (other special water) identified in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2 and Minn. R. 7050.0420 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10 and 23.11. [Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2, Minn. R. 7050] 23.6 Discharges to the Trout Streams (other special water) listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4 and Minn. R. 7050.0420 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10, 23.11 and 23.12. [Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4, Minn. R. 7050] 23.7 Discharges to impaired waters or a water with an USEPA approved TMDL for any of the impairments listed in this item must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9 and 23.10. Impaired waters are waters identified as impaired under section 303 (d) of the federal Clean Water Act for phosphorus (nutrient eutrophication biological indicators, nutrients), turbidity, TSS, dissolved oxygen or aquatic biota (fish bioassessment, aquatic plant bioassessment and aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessment, benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment). Terms used for the pollutants or stressors in this item are subject to change. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.8 Where the additional BMPs in this Section conflict with requirements elsewhere in this permit, items 23.9 through 23.14 take precedence. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.9 Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.5 & 8.8, and complete the stabilization within seven (7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.10 Permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin as described in Section 14 for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.11 Permittees must include an undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 100 linear feet from a special water (not including tributaries) and must maintain this buffer zone at all times, both during construction and as a permanent feature post construction, except where a water crossing or other encroachment is necessary to complete the project. Permittees must fully document the circumstance and reasons the buffer encroachment is necessary in the SWPPP and include restoration activities. This permit allows replacement of existing impervious surface within the buffer. Permittees must minimize all potential water quality, scenic and other environmental impacts of these exceptions by the use of additional or redundant (double)BMPs and must document this in the SWPPP for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.12 Permittees must design the permanent stormwater treatment system so the discharge from the project minimizes any increase in the temperature of trout streams resulting from the one (1) and two (2) year 24-hour precipitation events. This includes all tributaries of designated trout streams located within the same Public Land Survey System (PLSS) Section. Permittees must incorporate one or more of the following measures, in order of preference: a.Provide stormwater infiltration or other volume reduction practices as described in item 15.4 and 15.5, to reduce runoff. Infiltration systems must discharge all stormwater routed to the system within 24 hours. b.Provide stormwater filtration as described in Section 17. Filtration systems must discharge all stormwater routed to the system within 24 hours. c.Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas, or grass swales, and through the use of other non-structural controls. d.If ponding is used, the design must include an appropriate combination of measures such as shading, vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that limit temperature increases. The pond must be designed as a dry pond and should draw down in 24 hours or less. e.Other methods that minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.13 Permittees must conduct routine site inspections once every three (3) days as described in item 11.2 for projects that discharge to prohibited waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.14 If discharges to prohibited waters cannot provide volume reduction equal to one (1) inch times the net increase of impervious surfaces as required in item 15.4 and 15.5, permittees must develop a permanent stormwater treatment system design that will result in no net increase of TSS or phosphorus to the prohibited water. Permittees must keep the plan in the SWPPP for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.1 General Provisions. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.2 If the MPCA determines that an individual permit would more appropriately regulate the construction activity, the MPCA may require an individual permit to continue the construction activity. Coverage under this general permit will remain in effect until the MPCA issues an individual permit. [Minn. R. 7001.0210, subp. 6] 24.3 If the permittee cannot meet the terms and conditions of this general permit, an owner may request an individual permit, in accordance with Minn. R. 7001.0210 subp. 6. [Minn. R. 7001.0210, subp. 6] 24.4 Any interested person may petition the MPCA to require an individual NPDES/SDS permit in accordance with 40 CFR 122.28(b)(3). [40 CFR 122.28(b)(3)] 24.5 In addition to the requirement found in section 20, permittees must make the SWPPP, including all inspection reports, maintenance records, training records and other information required by this permit, available to federal, state, and local officials within three (3) days upon request for the duration of the permit and for three (3) years following the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.6 Permittees may not assign or transfer this permit except when the transfer occurs in accordance with the applicable requirements of item 3.7 and 3.8. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.7 Nothing in this permit must be construed to relieve the permittees from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance with the terms and conditions provided herein. Nothing in this permit must be construed to preclude the initiation of any legal action or relieve the permittees from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittees is/are or may be subject to under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act and Minn. Stat. Section 115 and 116, as amended. Permittees are not liable for permit requirements for activities occurring on those portions of a site where the permit has been transferred to another party as required in item 3.7 or the permittees have submitted the NOT as required in Section 4. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.8 The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit must not be affected thereby. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.9 The permittees must comply with the provisions of Minn. R. 7001.0150, subp. 3 and Minn. R. 7001.1090, subp. 1(A), 1(B), 1(C), 1(H), 1(I), 1(J), 1(K), and 1(L). [Minn. R. 7001] 24.10 The permittees must allow access as provided in 40 CFR 122.41(i) and Minn. Stat. Section 115.04. The permittees must allow representatives of the MPCA or any member, employee or agent thereof, when authorized by it, upon presentation of credentials, to enter upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of obtaining information or examination of records or conducting surveys or investigations. [40 CFR 122.41(i)] 24.11 For the purposes of Minn. R. 7090 and other documents that reference specific sections of this permit, "Stormwater Discharge Design Requirements" corresponds to Sections 5, 6 and 14 through 21; "Construction Activity Requirements" corresponds to Sections 7 through 13; and "Appendix A" corresponds to Sections 22 and 23. [Minn. R. 7090] Page 79 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282ERD.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:26AM24282ERD C303 VUNEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILSPage 80 of 124 ooo ooEXISTINGCLUBHOUSEPOOLPONDPARKING GARAGEBELOW GRADEPATIOGARAGEPROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN 12" RCP12" RCP12" CIP 12" CIP12" RCP12" RCP PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASINBOTTOM=878.00OLE=878.75100 YEAR HWL=879.49INFILTRATION CAPACITY=4,587 CFHALF-STOP ELEVATORAT MAIN ENTRANCELEXINGTON AVENUE INTERSTATE 35E11.17%PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE=896.00GFE=885.33GS895.60GS/EOF895.00CB/LP889.63GS890.40TC/CB883.32TC/CB883.82TC890.60TC891.20MATCH EX TC883.34TC894.32TC895.06TC/HP894.15TC893.75MATCH EX TC???TC891.30TC891.20TC891.40TC888.75TC888.48TC885.83GS890.10GS889.80TC/HP894.65TC888.30TC888.17GS895.50GS894.45GS890.46GS890.80GS894.30GS894.00GS896.00GS896.00GS896.00GS895.50GS895.50GS896.00GS895.60GS895.60TC885.83TC/LP885.50TC/LP885.50MATCH EX TC888.03FULL TC890.53TC/G890.10TC/G890.20FULL TC890.77TC890.80TC890.50TC889.35GS894.00GS893.00GS890.77GS892.13GS892.71GS894.28GS893.25MATCH EX TC882.28CONC891.16892890888890892892890888886884882880880878882884886888890892886884882884882884886886888890 8928 9 2 894896898900902904906908910912892894896898900906908910912892894896898900902904882892890890892888884890888886 TC888.65TC887.97TC887.87TC888.35MATCH EX TC888.07TC888.20GS882.00GS882.00GS882.00GS882.00GS896.00888CONC888.78894 892 878TC891.85TC892.20892TC893.828948 9 2TW:886.1BW:886.1TW:888.5BW:886.1TW:888.5BW:886.1TW:888.5BW:886.1TW:886.1BW:886.1880882884886 890888 880882GS878.00GS878.00GS878.00GS878.00882880EXISTINGAPARTMENTBUILDINGEXISTINGTENNISCOURTEXISTINGPOOLEXISTINGCLUBHOUSEEXISTINGPONDEX BIT879.62EOF881.50PROJECT NO.24282CAD FILE02/25/26DATEREVISIONSDRAWN BYDate:Reg.No. ERIC P. FAGERBERG 5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100 BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 PHONE: 952-890-6044 info@mnhill.com www.mnhill.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. P R E L I M I N A R Y MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA LEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITION CONDOR CORPORATIONFOR 2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282G.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AM GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN PROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED ASPHALT SURFACEPROPOSED INFILTRATION BASINPROPOSED WATERMAINIIPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWER>>PROPOSED CURB & GUTTERPROPOSED RETAINING WALLPROPOSED CONTOUR923PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED GRADING LIMITSEXISTING TELEPHONE BOXEXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOXEXISTING TREELINE/TREES>IEXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING WATERMAIN>IEXISTING CURB & GUTTEREXISTING ASPHALTEXISTING CONCRETESB-1EEEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING TELEVISION BOXEXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATIONEXISTING CLEANOUTEXISTING SIGNTTVGGGEXISTING UNDERGROUND GASEXISTING CONTOUR923LEGEND24282GC400Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSCALE IN FEET04080EPFPage 81 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII XXXXXXI I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND PROPOSED BUILDING INTERSTATE 35ELEXINGTON AVENUE(MNDOT R/W PLAT NO. 19-37)30000 TRD 10 ASH 30001 TRD 8 ASH 30002 TRD 10 8 ASH 30003 TRD 8 ASH 30004 TRD 8 ASH 30005 TRD 7 ASH 30006 TRD 9 ASH 30007 TRD 8 ASH 30008 TRD 10 ASH 30009 TRD 8 ASH 30010 TRD 7 ASH30011 TRD 6 ASH 30012 TRD 7 ASH 30013 TRD 6 ASH 30014 TRD 8 6 ASH 30015 TRD 11 10 ASH 30016 TRD 8 ASH 30017 TRD 7 ASH 30018 TRD 7 ASH 30019 TRD 10 ASH 30020 TRD 22 WALNUT 30021 TRD 8 WALNUT 30022 TRD 14 14 ASH 30023 TRD 12 BASSWOOD 30024 TRD 10 BASSWOOD 30025 TRD 9 ASH 30026 TRD 18 WALNUT 30027 TRD 12 12 OAK30028 TRD 9 MAPLE 30029 TRD 9 ASH 30030 TRD 7 MAPLE 30031 TRD 8 MAPLE 30032 TRD 12 WALNUT 30033 TRD 13 12 11 WALNUT 20026 " ASH 20029 " SPRUCE 20031 " SPRUCE 20071 " ASH 20107 " SPRUCE 20108 " SPRUCE 20109 " SPRUCE 20116 " ASH 20117 " SPRUCE 20166 18" LOCUST 20167 18" LOCUST 20173 10" SOFT MAPLE 20179 11" PINE 20183 15" CRAB 20184 8" CRAB 20195 4" PINE 20203 10" SOFT MAPLE 20209 6" SOFT MAPLE 20214 11" PINE 20221 24" LOCUST 20222 18" LOCUST 20224 19" LOCUST 20234 16" LOCUST 20261 24" LOCUST 20265 8" SOFT MAPLE 20275 10" CRAB 20276 12" CRAB 20277 15" CRAB 20278 10" CRAB 20279 12" CRAB 20280 15" CRAB 20293 17" CRAB 20294 11" PINE 20295 14" SOFT MAPLE 20296 15" SOFT MAPLE 20297 11" SOFT MAPLE 20298 18" ASH 20299 8" SOFT MAPLE 20300 6" OAK 20301 14" SOFT MAPLE 20302 17" SOFT MAPLE 20369 20" ASH PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282TP.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AM24282TP C401TREE PERSERVATIONVUN LEGEND Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 EXISTING TREE GRADING/DISTURBANCE LIMITS REMOVE TREE EXISTING TREE (OFF-SITE) TREE REMOVAL POINT NO.SIZE (IN.)SPECIES 20026 XX ASH 20029 XX SPRUCE 20031 XX SPRUCE 20071 XX ASH 20107 XX SPRUCE 20108 XX SPRUCE 20109 XX SPRUCE 20116 XX ASH 20117 XX SPRUCE 20294 11 PINE 20295 14 SOFT MAPLE 20296 15 SOFT MAPLE 20297 56 SOFT MAPLE 20298 18 ASH 20299 20 SOFT MAPLE 20300 6 OAK 20369 20 ASH 30000 10 ASH 30001 8 ASH 30004 8 ASH 30005 7 ASH 30012 7 ASH 30013 6 ASH 30014 14 ASH 30015 21 ASH 30016 8 ASH 30017 7 ASH 30018 7 ASH 30025 9 ASH 30028 9 MAPLE 30029 9 ASH 30030 7 MAPLE 30031 8 MAPLE 30032 12 WALNUT TOTAL TREES REMOVED 35 TOTAL CALIPERS INCH REMOVED 317 Page 82 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII XXXXXXI I I I I I I I I I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STMH-104 RE 892.84 15" INV 884.75 S 18" INV 883.00 NW BLD=9.84' CB-105 RE 889.63 15" INV 885.67 N BLD=3.96' STMH-103 RE 891.66 18" INV 881.47 SE 18" INV 879.55 W 12" INV 879.55 S BLD=12.11' CBMH-102 RE 883.32 18" INV 878.99 E 18" INV 878.99 S BLD=4.33' CBMH-101 RE 883.82 18" INV 878.89 N 24" INV 878.93 SW 4.0' SUMP INV 874.89 BLD=8.93' PROVIDE PRESERVER ENERGY DISSIPATOR & SKIMMER SIZE PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS STMH-107 RE 888.98 12" INV 882.70 N 12" INV 882.79 SE 12" INV 888.48 NE BLD=6.28' FES-100 24" INV 878.75 NE FES-200 18" INV 877.10 E OCS-201 RE 879.03 18" INV 877.20 W BLD=1.83' 162 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.3 5 % 25 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.40% 153 L F - 1 8 " HDP E @ 1 . 0 0 %102 LF - 15"HDPE @ 0.90%37 LF - 18" RCP CL 5 @ 0.26% RD-1 12" INV 890.00 W 16 LF - 12" PVC SCH-40 @ 0.00% STMH-106 12" INV 881.08 S 12" INV 881.08 N 12" INV 890.00 E153 LF - 12"HDPE @ 1.00%202 LF - 12"HDPE @ 0.80%41 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% TRENCH DRAIN-1 RE 885.00 12" INV 883.00 NW BLD=2.00' SEE DETAIL 32 LF - 12" PVC SCH-40 @ 4.68% RD-2 12" INV 890.00 SW 157 LF - 8" PVCC-900 @ 1.10%EX SSMH RIM=887.91 INV.=869.51 EX SSMH RIM=891.16 INV.=868.09 EX 12" SAN EX 12" SAN 8" SANITARY SERVICE 8" PLUG INV = 873.40 COORDINATE GAS MAIN CROSSING W/ XXXXXXXXXX12" X 8" WET TAP W/ 8" G.V. & BOX FIELD VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION REPAIR LEXINGTON AVE TO EXISTING CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 8" PVC C-900 8" PVC C - 9 0 0 12'8" PVC WATER SERVICE PROVIDE 8" PLUG TOP GAS MAIN = XXX.XX TOP WATERMAIN = 886.60TOP GAS MAIN = XXX.XX TOP STORM SEWER = 881.54 TOP GAS MAIN = XXX.XX TOP STORM SEWER = 883.53 LEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35EEX SSMH RIM=881.21 INV.=870.56 EX SSMH RIM=882.76 INV.=871.30 EX 12" SANEX 12" SANEX 12" WMEX 12" WMPROPOSED BUILDING FFE=896.00 GFE=885.3388 LF - 24"RCP CL 3 @ 0.20 % SAW CUT EX PAVING TO INSTALL WATER MAIN RE-GRADE DITCH AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE CONNECTION FROM FES-200 TO EX FES REPAIR TRAIL TO EXISTING CONDITION AFTER OUTLET CONSTRUCTION TRAIL GRADE OVER PIPE MUST ENSURE PIPE IS OUTSIDE OF TRAIL SECTION (3" BIT + 6" CL 5) COORDINATE UTILITY RELOCATION WITH SMALL UTILITY COMPANIES IF REQUIRED EX 24" FES INV.=877.10 EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND SSMH-1 RE 890.41 8" INV 871.57 SE 8" INV 871.67 N BLD=18.84' FIELD VERIFY LOC & ELEV PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION REPAIR DISTURBED ARES TO EXISTING CONDITION MATCH EXISTING GRADES AND SECTIONS 44 L F - 8 " P V C C-9 0 0 @ 1 . 1 0 % EX SSMH RE 889.58 8" INV 871.08 NW 8" INV 867.80 W 8" INV 867.80 E BLD=21.78' CONSTRUCT INSIDE DROP PER CITY DETAIL S-4/S-5 SHORING/TRENCH BOXES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONTSRUCTION TO KEEP DISTURBANCES OUTSIDE MNDOT ROW FIELD VERIFY LOC & ELEV PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION REPAIR DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONDITION MATCH EXISTING GRADES AND SECTIONS (IF REQ'D) COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF TO PROVIDE SAN. BYPASS IF WORK WITHIN MH IS REQUIRED SAW CUT EX PAVING TO INSTALL STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282U.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AM24282U C500UTILITY PLANEPF LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED WATERMAINII PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER >>PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE>I >I OHP OHP X X X X G G G E E E UFO UFO UFO T T T EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREELINE/TREES EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING UNDERGROUND GAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING TV PEDESTAL EXISTING SOIL BORING LOCATION S TV T EXISTING MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) EXISTING SIGN EXISTING VAULT E V SB-1 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL INV. =883.00INV.=883.00 NEENAH R-4990-DX TYPE 'A' GRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL RIM TO MATCH PROPOSED ASPHALT. TC 885.50 RIM=885.00 12" HDPE 12"NOT TO SCALE 18" RCPINV 877.20 879.50 878.7548" SLANT TOP SPLIT GRATE (SEE DETAIL) RIM ELEV 878.75 9" OUTLET STRUCTURE 201 (OCS-201) NOT TO SCALE Page 83 of 124 G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGoooo G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGGGGGG G G oX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXooooooooooo o o o oOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOHU OHU E E E E E E E E E E E E ET T V T >>>>>>>IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII XXXXXX9'TYP33 9'TYP14 24' TYP PROPOSED BUILDING PARKING G A R A G E BELOW GR A D E PATIO 15' 25.2'PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN62.3' 44' 18' TYP 18' TYP24'R 36' TO FA C E GARAGER60'R3 'MAINENTRANCELEXINGTON AVENUEINTERSTATE 35E5'EXISTING APARTMEN T BUILDING EXISTING TENNIS COURT EXISTING POOL EXISTING CLUBHOUS E EXISTING POND R3'R 3 ' R 3 'R6'R3' A A C C D D E E E D B F F C G 5'R3'R3' R 3 'R3'14 26 17 30' EXPAND POOL CONCRETE PATIO NEW CONCRETE PATIO PADS: - PERGOLA - COMMUNITY TABLE - GRILLING REMOVE EXISTING GRILL PADS RENOVATION OF EXISTING TENNIS COURT INTO (2) PICKLEBALL COURTS REMOVE EXISTING GRILL PAD 28'15' PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282PAV.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AM24282PAV C600 VUN Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 PAVING & DIMENSIONAL PLANLEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED BITUMINOUS SURFACE PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OHP OHP X X X X EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EXISTING FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING TV PEDESTALTV T EXISTING MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) EXISTING SIGN EXISTING VAULT E V KEY NOTES 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKA RIBBON CURBB DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY GROSS PROJECT AREA (LOT 1, BLOCK 1 & OUTLOT A)6.71 AC/ 292,409 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.36 AC/102,677 SF NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 0.38 AC/ 16,383 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.74 AC/119,060 SF (40.7%) FRONT SETBACK 50 FEET REAR SETBACK 40 FEET SIDE SETBACK 40 FEET EXISTING ZONING PUD (R-3 UNDERLYING) PROPOSED ZONING PUD (R-3 UNDERLYING) BUILDING FOOTPRINT 22,571 SF PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED 61 NEW SURFACE STALLS FOR NEW BUILDING 84 GARAGE STALLS TOTAL 84 UNITS (110 BEDROOMS) 145 STALLS (SURFACE + GARAGE) TOTAL 145 STALLS/84 UNITS = 1.73 STALLS/UNIT 145 STALLS/110 BEDROOMS = 1.32 STALLS/BEDROOM PARKING STALL AREA (INCLUDING ADA ACCESS) = 10,867SF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA (10%) = 1,087 SF PROVIDED LANDSCAPED ISLAND AREA = 1,351 SF EXISTING PARKING 45 SURFACE STALLS FOR EXISTING BUILDING 75 GARAGE STALLS 75 UNITS (120 BEDROOMS) 120 STALLS (SURFACE + GARAGE) TOTAL 120 STALLS/75 UNITS = 1.60 STALLS/UNIT 120 STALLS/120 BEDROOMS = 1.00 STALLS/BEDROOM SITE PLAN NOTES 1.SEE GENERAL NOTES, SHEET C101, FOR ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION. 2.EXISTING SURFACE LOT SHALL BE RE-STRIPED AS SHOWN. ERADICATION AT A MINIMUM WILL BE REQUIRED. MILL & OVERLAY OR CHIP SEAL ARE ADDITIONAL OPTIONS OWNER MAY ELECT TO UTILIZE ON REMAINING EXISTING BITUMINOUS. 3.CLUBHOUSE IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED BY OTHERS PROPOSED RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALLC B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERD TIP OUT CURBE PEDESTRIAN RAMPF 6' TRANSITION TO FULL CURBG TYPICAL PARKING LOT SECTION 8" - MnDOT 2211, CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED STONE/RECYCLE 2" - SPNWB230C NON-WEAR COURSE MnDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 1.5" - SPWEB240C WEAR COURSE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC/APPROVED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK RIBBON CURB CLASS 5 SLOPE VARIES CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE 4" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (2211) 100% CRUSHED 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK (2531) 5'1'1' 20"7"TYPICAL PARKING SPACE SIGNING & STRIPING NOT TO SCALE ADA PARKING SIGN (R7-8m) VAN ACCESSIBLE (R7-8b) B612 CURB & GUTTER 9'9'9'18'3'4" SOLID WHITE LINE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY 45°0' 0 . 0 " ' ADA PARKING SIGN (R7-8m) VAN ACCESSIBLE (R7-8b) NO PARKING 12" SOLID WHITE LETTERING (OPTIONAL) 6' TRANSITION FROM RIBBON TO FULL B612 CURB & GUTTER 9' WIDE RIBBON CURB FLUSH WITH ASPHALT 6'6' 6' TRANSITION FROM RIBBON TO FULL B612 CURB & GUTTER Page 84 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282D.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AMCONSTRUCTION DETAILS24282D C700 VUN Page 85 of 124 PROJECT NO. 24282 CAD FILE 02/25/26 DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY Date:Reg.No.ERIC P. FAGERBERG5377202/25/262026-04-02 CITY COMMENTS2999 WEST C.R. 42, SUITE 100BURNSVILLE, MN 55306PHONE: 952-890-6044info@mnhill.comwww.mnhill.comI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.PRELIMINARYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTALEXINGTON HEIGHTS ADDITIONCONDOR CORPORATIONFOR2320 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120F:\_Civil 3D Projects\24282\PRE-PLAT PLANS\24282D.dwg - 4/02/2026 11:27AMCONSTRUCTION DETAILS24282D C701 VUN Page 86 of 124 STORM BASINPER CIVIL PLANSNATIVE SEED MIXPROPOSED BUILDINGDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECK DECKDECKDECK DECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKINTERST A T E 3 5 - E EXISTING TREES & BRUSH TO REMAINTURF SODTURF SODTURF SODTURF SODEXISTING LANDSCAPEEXISTING LANDSCAPEEXISTING LANDSCAPEEXISTING BUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGPER SCHEDULE ONSHEET L102TURF SODTURF SOD EXISTING LAWNEXISTING LAWNEXISTING LAWNEXISTING LAWNTURF SODEXISTING LAWN6' TURF SOD MOW STRIPPAVING PERCIVIL PLANSPAVING PERCIVIL PLANSSIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANSSEED TO FENCE EDGESEED TO FENCE EDGESEED BETWEEN LOT LINE AND FENCEEXISTING LAWNTURF SODTURF SODTURF SODNATIVE SEED MIXPER SCHEDULE ONSHEET L102SEED/SOD LINE36" MOW STRIPSEED/SOD LINESEED/SOD LINE12' NATIVE GRASS BUFFER STRIPSEED BETWEEN LOT LINE AND FENCE12" NATIVE GRASS BUFFER STRIPEASEMENTEASEMENTPAVING PER CIVIL PLANSFURNITURE BY OTHERSBUILDINGENTRYGARAGEENTRYEVERGREEN TREE, TYP.DECIDUOUS COLUMNAR TREE, TYP.COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.ORNAMENTAL TREES, TYP.FOUNDATION PLANTING AREA, TYP. ROCK MULCH PER NOTESNATIVE GRASS SEEDTO DISTURBED LIMITS.FIELD VERIFY.NATIVE GRASS SEEDTO DISTURBED LIMITS.FIELD VERIFY.COLUMNAR EVERGREEN TREE, TYP.BUFFER PLANTING, TYP.OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE BELOW.DO NOT PLANT ABOVE.FOUNDATION PLANTING AREA, TYP. ROCK MULCH PER NOTESFOUNDATION PLANTING AREA, TYP. ROCK MULCH AREA PER NOTESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSTREE, TYP.NATIVE SHRUBSAND GRASSES, TYP.OVERSTORYDECIDUOUSTREE, TYP.OVERSTORYDECIDUOUSTREE, TYP.FOUNDATION PLANTING AREA, TYP. ROCK MULCH PER NOTESOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.EVERGREEN TREE, TYP.COLUMNAR EVERGREEN TREE, TYP.BUFFER PLANTING, TYP.OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.COLUMNAR DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.LANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTESLANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTESLANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTESTURF SOD TODISTURBED LIMITS.FIELD VERIFY.TURF SOD TODISTURBED LIMITS.FIELD VERIFY.TURF SOD TO DISTURBEDLIMITS. FIELD VERIFY.TURF SODORNAMENTALDECIDUOUSTREES, TYP.LANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTESWOOD MULCH PER NOTES. WOOD MULCH TOEDGE OF EXISTINGCURB, TYP.WOOD MULCH TOEDGE OF PROPOSEDCURB, TYP.SPADED EDGE AT LOT LINEOR TAPER AS NECESSARYDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number1301 American Blvd. ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000fax: (612) 879-6666www.kaaswilson.comam a duly Licensed Landscape ArchitectI hereby certify that this plan, specifi-cation, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that ITyped Name under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Registration NumberDateBenjamin D. Hartberg, PLABHAL02/25/202626117Lexington HeightsApartmentsMendota Heights, MNLandscape Architect:CALYX DESIGN GROUP475 Cleveland Ave. N. Suite 101ASaint Paul, MN 55104(651) 788-9018Civil Engineering:James R Hill, Inc.2999 West County Rd. 42, Suite 100Burnsville, MN 55306Phone: (952) 890-6044Rev. No.Revision Date SignaturePrepared for:Condor Corporation2320 Lexington AvenueMendota Heights, MN 5512048084PRELIM INARY 1 City Comments 04/02/2026 L101PLANLANDSCAPELANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN:1.Landscape contractor to provide a new irrigation layout plan for the property. See landscape note #17 onSheet L102.2.See Civil Engineer's plans for grading layout and requirements3.Contractor to coordinate any work in the right-of-way with City of Mendota Heights Public WorksDepartment.4.Sod all disturbed areas except plant beds and areas noted to receive rock mulch.5.Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction,includingright-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise.6.Trim existing trees to remain that have branches over-hanging the work zone. Engage a certified arboristto perform tree trimming.7.Coordinate irrigation connection in the building with the General Contractor and Mechanical Contractor forthe project. Coordinate irrigation sleeving with earthwork and paving contractors.8.Landscape contractor is responsible for verification of soils and graded condition prior to mobilization andshall notify the General Contractor if earthwork is not acceptable. Landscape contractor is responsible forfine grading, or grade to within 1" of final set elevation.GENERAL NOTES:Existing Tree To RemainLANDSCAPE LEGEND:New Turf SodNative Seed-MesicSee Sheet L103Landscape EdgerSee Sheet L102See Sheet L102Rock MulchNative Seed-UplandSee Sheet L103SYMBOLCODEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZECONTAINERQTYCOLUMNAR TREEAR2Acer rubrum `Red Rocket``Red Rocket` Red Maple2.5" Cal.B&B3BJ2Betula platyphylla 'Jefpark'Parkland Pillar® Asian White Birch2.5" Cal.B&B6PEPopulus tremula `Erecta`Columnar Swedish Aspen2.5" Cal.B&B9EVERGREEN TREESABAbies balsameaBalsam Fir6` Hgt.B&B7JEJuniperus virginianaEastern Red Cedar8` Hgt.B&B8PdPicea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce6` Hgt.B&B6TOThuja occidentalisAmerican Arborvitae6` Hgt.B&B5TAThuja occidentalis `Art Boe` TMNorth Pole Arborvitae6` Hgt.B&B19ORNAMENTAL TREESMSMalus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crab Apple1.5" Cal.B&B4OVERSTORY TREESASAcer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple2.5" Cal.B&B2BRBetula nigraRiver Birch2.5" Cal.B&B4COCeltis occidentalisCommon Hackberry2.5" Cal.B&B3GDGleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TMStreet Keeper Honey Locust4" Cal.B&B2OVOstrya virginianaAmerican Hophornbeam2.5" Cal.B&B2QRQuercus rubraNorthern Red Oak2.5" Cal.B&B3SHRUBSAmAronia melanocarpa `Morton` TMIroquis Beauty Black Chokeberry5 gal.Pot9Cr2Clethra alnifolia `Ruby Spice`Ruby Spice Clethra5 gal.Pot15CiCornus sericea `Isanti`Isanti Redosier Dogwood5 gal.Pot26DlDiervilla loniceraDwarf Bush Honeysuckle3 gal.Pot27EcEuonymus fortunei `Canadale Gold`Canadale Gold Euonymus3 gal.Pot15JfJuniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper5 gal.Pot27RgRhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac5 gal.Pot5Sm3Spiraea x bumalda `Goldmound`Gold Mound Spirea5 gal.Pot8ANNUALS/PERENNIALSNwNepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint1 gal.Pot9GRASSESAg2Andropogon gerardiiBig Blue Stem1 gal.Pot44CkCalamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass1 gal.Pot33PLANT SCHEDULERefer to Civil Plans for Tree Inventory (See Sheet C401)Number of Trees to be Planted due to New Construction: 83Page 87 of 124 DateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number1301 American Blvd. ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000fax: (612) 879-6666www.kaaswilson.comam a duly Licensed Landscape ArchitectI hereby certify that this plan, specifi-cation, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that ITyped Name under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Registration NumberDateBenjamin D. Hartberg, PLABHAL02/25/202626117Lexington HeightsApartmentsMendota Heights, MNLandscape Architect:CALYX DESIGN GROUP475 Cleveland Ave. N. Suite 101ASaint Paul, MN 55104(651) 788-9018Civil Engineering:James R Hill, Inc.2999 West County Rd. 42, Suite 100Burnsville, MN 55306Phone: (952) 890-6044Rev. No.Revision Date SignaturePrepared for:Condor Corporation2320 Lexington AvenueMendota Heights, MN 5512048084PRELIM INARY 1 City Comments 04/02/2026 L102TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES.MINIMUM (2) PER TREE.SODROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDEDMULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE SPECPLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC.TOPSOILSUBGRADEOTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASALFLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDINGCONTACT WITH TRUNK.NOTE: SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAPDRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC.FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS.FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALLGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORENSURING THE TREES ARE IN A PLUMBPOSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD.TREE HEIGHT MEASURED FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO BASE OF CENTRAL LEADER.LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES:1L102DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTIONNOT TO SCALE............................................................ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLANWIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM.3'' DEPTH WATERING BASINPLANTING SOIL PER NOTES.MULCH PER PLAN NOTEFINISHED GRADEPLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATEDPLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCEDHOLE WIDTH.2L102TYP. SHRUB PLANTING - SECTIONNOT TO SCALE1'-6" (MIN.)4"FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB.MULCH PER NOTESLANDSCAPE EDGER PER NOTES3 OZ. LANDSCAPE FABRIC, TURN-UPFINISHED GRADEPITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAYFROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS.NOTES: SEE GRADING PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION.PLANT BED WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN.AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4".SEE PLANSWIDTHS MAY VARYSUBMIT ROCK MULCH SAMPLE FOR OWNER APPROVAL.LANDSCAPE FABRIC TO BE FREE-DRAINING.3L102MULCH AND EDGER DETAILNOT TO SCALE1. Tree saucer mulch to be four inches (4") depth natural single-shred hardwood mulch for trees outside of a plant bed. Install per tree planting detail.2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control.3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless notedotherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified.4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist.5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown.6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval.Significant changes may require city review and approval.7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and afterinstallation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours.8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified.9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growthrequirements.10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition thatmight negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client priorto bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shall be brought to the attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately.11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around thebuilding site.12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time of owner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism or damagewhich may occur prior to owner acceptance shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance programincluding, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control.13. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit morethan 10% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodentprotection measures for the plantings during the warranty period.14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested bythe city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc.15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process.16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field.17. The landscape contractor shall provide a quote and furnish an Irrigation Layout Plan for head-to-head coverage of all tree, turf and shrub planting areas.Use commercial-grade irrigation equipment and provide product cut-sheets and (4) copies of the proposed layout plan to the landscape architect for reviewand approval. Coordinate irrigation connection point, controller, back-flow and valve locations with the builder & general contractor.18. All edger shall be professional grade black vinyl lawn edging, 5 inch tall x 20 feet long (minimum) straight lengths. Anchor every 18" on-center(minimum). Edger must be UV stable. Submit sample for Owner review.19. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site during landscapework activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately.20. MULCH: Plant beds noted to receive rock mulch shall be 4" depth of 1-1/2" dia. trap rock mulch, Dresser Trap Rock Inc. or equal. Plant beds noted toreceive wood mulch shall be 4" depth of Western Red Cedar wood mulch. Submit mulch samples for Owner approval. Do not install weed mat underperennials, with the exception of ornamental grasses.21 All planting, seeding, and sodded areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with a harley power box rake or equal to provide a firm plantingbed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc.22. Turf installation activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2024 edition, for turf bed preparation,installation, maintenance, and warranty.23. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation.24. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreignmaterials. Remove trees where noted on the plan, including the stump to 30" below grade.25. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations.26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction ofthe municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape.27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate withthe general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc.28. See Site and Civil plans for additional information regarding the project.29. All sub-cut areas of the site that are designated on the site plan as open space for landscape shall have no less than 6" of imported, pulverized topsoil.Slope away from building.30. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting thisrequirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MnDOT Free-Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re-testsub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement.31. Landscape contractor shall coordinate tree removal activities and ensure all trees designated for removal are gone before start of landscape installation.Grind stump to 30" below grade and back-fill with topsoil.32. Landscape contractor shall include in their bid to remove any existing shrubs, sod, edger, fabric, and edger that interferes with new improvements shownin this package.33. Landscape contractor to install tree trunk protection for all newly planted deciduous trees.STAKE TREES AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN ANUPRIGHT AND PLUMB HABIT. USE NON-MARRINGTREE-GUY WEBBING AND CABLES OR STAKES.INSTALL 6" WHITE DRAIN TILE TRUNK GUARDMARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THENURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACENORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE.4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY).REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAPFROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL.IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL,CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTOPLANTING HOLE.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL.NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEEPLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLENDSOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PERNOTES.TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOTPRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAINTHE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTERPLANTING.NOTES:ENSURE TREE PIT PASSES REQUIRED PERCOLATION TESTING.OPEN BURLAP AND REMOVE EXCESSSOIL UNTIL THE TOP OF THE FIRSTMAJOR ROOT IS VISIBLE. PLANT TOTHIS DEPTH TO HELP PREVENTENCIRCLING ROOTS.ONLY PRUNE DEAD BRANCHES THE FIRST YEARAFTER PLANTING.MULCH RING: 4' DIAMETER MINIMUM, 6' DIAMETERPREFERRED.DOUBLE STAKE WITH 1" POLYPROPYLENEWEBBING THROUGH THE EYE OF THE CINCH-TIERUBBER SUPPORTS. AVOID DAMAGE TO THEROOT BALL WITH SUPPORT STAKES.NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASS TREE STAKES.11/16" x 6'-0".4L102CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAILNOT TO SCALELANDSCAPE NOTES:MIN.MIN.SEE PLANPERENNIAL PLANT18" MIN.6"EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN.MULCH PER NOTES.PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES.CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADENOTE:HAND-LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZEDPLANT MATERIALS.5L102TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILNOT TO SCALE6"EXISTING SOD BLADEEXISTING THATCH LAYERSOILNEW SOD BLADENEW THATCH LAYERSOILSUB CUT FOR NEW SODTHATCH LAYERS TO HAVEMATCHING ELEVATION1"3/4"4"CONCRETE SIDEWALK* THATCH LAYERS TO MATCH* NO THATCH ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE* SUB-CUT AND FINAL GRADE BY SOD INSTALLEROR CURB6L102TURF SOD TO EXISTING SOD DETAILNOT TO SCALELANDSCAPENOTES &DETAILSPage 88 of 124 DateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number1301 American Blvd. ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000fax: (612) 879-6666www.kaaswilson.comam a duly Licensed Landscape ArchitectI hereby certify that this plan, specifi-cation, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that ITyped Name under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Registration NumberDateBenjamin D. Hartberg, PLABHAL02/25/202626117Lexington HeightsApartmentsMendota Heights, MNLandscape Architect:CALYX DESIGN GROUP475 Cleveland Ave. N. Suite 101ASaint Paul, MN 55104(651) 788-9018Civil Engineering:James R Hill, Inc.2999 West County Rd. 42, Suite 100Burnsville, MN 55306Phone: (952) 890-6044Rev. No.Revision Date SignaturePrepared for:Condor Corporation2320 Lexington AvenueMendota Heights, MN 5512048084PRELIM INARY 1 City Comments 04/02/2026 L103LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, AND SCHEDULES:Native Seed Areas noted per plan: (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be:MnDOT #33-261 seed mixture for Stormwater Treatment Basin South & West, drop-seeded into thetopsoil layer at 35.0 lbs per acre. Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per CivilPlans and Specifications.Add 20lbs per acre of MnDOT 21-111 Oats Cover Crop.NATIVE SEED MIX:NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD:Drop Seeding Onto Tilled SitesThis is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those on construction projects.a)Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to a minimum depth of 3inches.b)Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a general recommendation is a10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200 lbs/acre.c)Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will accurately meter thetypes of seed to be planted, keep all seeds uniformly mixed during the seeding and containdrop seed tubes for seed placement (Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equipped with acultipacker assembly to ensure seed-to-soil contact.d)Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the specified mix.e)Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the site should be cultipackedfollowing the seeding to ensure seed-to-soil contact.f)Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber or paper fiber, water, andM-Binder at 100 lbs per acre.Note: Heavy equipment is not allowed in the infiltration basins to keep soils from getting compacted.If any compaction occurs due to seeding operations, the soils must be uncompacted.NATIVE SEED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS:Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3)Year 1Establishment (spring seeding):1)Prepare site - Late April - May2)Seed - May 1 - June 1Maintenance:1)Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30.2)Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles, etc.Establishment (fall seeding):1)Prepare site - Late August - early September2)Seed - late September to freeze-upMaintenance (following season):1)Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc.Evaluation:1)Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings).2)Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows.3)Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall.4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary.Year 2Maintenance:1)Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed.2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc.3)Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year.Evaluation:1)Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting.2)Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short.3)Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.).4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site.Year 3Maintenance:1)Mow only if necessary.2)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.3)Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year.Evaluation:1)Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc.Long-termMaintenance:1)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc.2)Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible.3)Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may substitute forburning).4)Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites.NATIVE SEED MIX:Native Seed Areas noted per plan: (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be:MnDOT Southern Shortgrass Roadside Mix, drilled into the topsoil layer at 160.0 lbs per acre. Submitseed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications.IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS:1. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHOULD AVERAGE 40(+/-) PSI AT THE BASE OF ALL SPRINKLER HEADS. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF EXISTING PRESSURE DIFFERS. BUILDINGPRESSURE IS NOT KNOWN.2. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE FULL IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLANS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REVIEW. LAYOUT WORK AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE. THECONTRACTOR MAY MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LOCATION AND SPACING AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. HEAD LOCATIONS SHALL BEFLAGGED AND REVIEWED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.3. COORDINATE SLEEVING AND IRRIGATION PIPE / HEAD / INTERNAL PLUMBING INSTALLATION WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS.4. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DETAILED ON DRAWINGS. (HOWEVER, IF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT THOROUGHLY DESCRIBE THEMETHOD OR TECHNIQUES TO BE USED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE INSTALLATION METHODS ISSUED BY THE MANUFACTURER. ALL SUCH LITERATURE MUST BESUBMITTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.)5. CHECK AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS, UTILITIES AND SERVICES PRIOR TO TRENCHING.6. LATERAL PIPING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DEEP AND MAINLINES A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES DEEP.7. ALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND LATERAL PIPE OF 1-1/2" AND LARGER SHALL BE PVC (SDR 26 / CLASS 160). ALL OTHER LATERAL PIPE OF 1-1/4" AND SMALLER MAY BEPOLYETHYLENE.8. ALL TEES AND ELBOWS SHALL BE PVC (160 PSI). INCLUDE THRUST BLOCKING AT TEE AND ELBOW POINTS.9. ALL SPRINKLERS SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE HUNTER HEADS.10. ADJUST HEADS FOR GRADE, AS NECESSARY, AFTER TURF GRASS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ALL SETTLEMENT AT HEADS HAS OCCURRED.11. ALL AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS, RISERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND HOSE BIBS SHALL BE SET PLUM. SPRINKLER HEAD RISERS, QUICK COUPLER VALVES AND ALL VALVESWITH STEMS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISHED GRADE.12. CONTROL VALVE WIRES, INCLUDING THE GROUND WIRE, SHALL BE #12 GAUGE U.F.U.L. APPROVED DIRECT BURIAL. UNDERGROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH 3-MWIRE CONNECTORS (DBY) OR APPROVED EQUAL.13. TRACER-WIRE IS TO BE PLACED OVER ALL MAIN AND LATERAL LINES.14. PLACE ALL VALVES IN APPROVED VALVE BOXES.15. USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED JOINTS.16. BRAND EACH VALVE BOX WITH 2" HIGH LETTERING SHOWING ZONE NUMBER AND CONTROLLER LETTER (EXAMPLE 'A3'). THIS STAMP IS TO MATCH THE ZONE SHOWN ON THE PLAN UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.17. CONDUCT PERFORMANCE TEST IN THE PRESENCE OF OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF SYSTEM INSTALLATION.18. CONDUCT AND DEMONSTRATE WINTERIZATION AND SPRING START-UP PROCESS TO OWNER IN THE FALL OF COMPLETION.19. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED TO VERIFY TRENCH DEPTHS BEFORE BACKFILLING.20. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE MECHANICAL ROOM WATER CONNECTION POINT WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER AND PLUMBING CONTRACTOR.21.AFTER INSTALLATION OF DRIP IRRIGATION PIPE IS COMPLETE AND PRIOR TO SODDING OR MULCH INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO REVIEW THE INSTALLATION OF THE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM.22. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST HEADS IN THE FIELD TO ENSURE WATER DOES NOT SPRAY THE BUILDING FACE OR PAVED AREAS.23.COORDINATE LOCATION OF ROOFTOP-MOUNTED ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE (RAIN) SENSOR WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT.24.COORDINATE LOCATION OF SLEEVING UNDER PAVED AREAS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR, EARTHWORK, AND PAVING SUB-CONTRACTORS.25.SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN AND PRODUCT DATA TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.26.IRRIGATION BID SHALL INCLUDE (1) FALL SHUT-DOWN AND (1) SPRING START-UP (SPRING OF THE YEAR FOLLOWING INSTALLATION).27.THIS PROJECT WILL USE HUNTER COMMERCIAL IRRIGATION PRODUCTS.28.PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR CONTROLLER. POST IRRIGATION ZONE LAYOUT MAP AT 8"x10" NEXT TO THE CONTROLLER FORREFERENCE.29.PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT PLAN (PAPER AND CAD .DWG) UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION.Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey from Hill, Inc.·Do not begin tree clearing work until tree protection measures are in place and to the permit approval of the City Forester hasbeen granted.·Critical Root Zone:Install high density polyethylene safety fence, 4 ft. high, international orange, at the Drip Line or at the Critical Root Zone whichever is greater, of trees to be preserved per detail, prior to commencement of earthwork activity. Field-staking of the fence location(s) subject to City approval.·Where silt fence and proposed tree protection fence overlap, place the tree protection fence on the outside of the silt fence,double-staked at the break-point.·Install 48" Tall Orange Snow Fence at the Drip Line of Existing Trees to Remain.·The contractor shall prune the canopy of existing trees to remain where the canopy is in jeopardy of damage due to the newimprovements shown. It is recommended that the contractor hire a certified arborist to perform the pruning. Any branches brokenduring construction shall be immediately trimmed and wounds painted to prevent further damage.·Perform work in accordance with the laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of public authority having jurisdiction.Secure and pay for permits, governmental fees and licenses necessary for the proper execution of the demolition work.·Provide protective coverings and enclosures as necessary to prevent damage to existing work that is to remain. Existing work toremain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curbs, utilities, buildings and/or other structures on oradjacent to the demolition site. Provide temporary fences and barricades as required for the safe and proper execution of thework and the protection of persons and property.·Remove debris, waste, and rubbish promptly from the site. On-site burial of debris is not permitted. Burn no debris on the site.Salvage material not otherwise indicated to be reused shall become the Contractor's property and is to be removed promptlyfrom the site and disposed of in strict accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and/or statutes.·Buildings, features, surfaces, and other descriptive references shown on this drawing are for informational purposes only. Fieldverify all information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. Visit the site and determine all site conditions andhazards.·This plan is a guide as to the anticipated amount of disturbance expected due to proposed improvements. The contractor isexpected to take all necessary precautions to ensure trees noted to remain are not damaged during construction. Do not storematerial or drive within the drip line of existing trees to remain. Be aware of overhead branches for clearance of material andequipment.·This plan is not a guarantee that existing trees will survive during/post construction, but rather a guide to help assure theirprotection and greatest chances of survival at the surface level. Further protection measures outside this scope could involveecologists, foresters and arborists.·Notify the Owner's Representative when tree protection fencing is taken down to perform work in conjunction with the newimprovements noted in this plan set. The contractor is responsible for re-erecting the tree protection fence immediately after thework is complete, when ever possible·Trees shown as existing to remain (be preserved) that are damaged / killed as a result of construction activities are subject toreplacement per the City Tree Replacement penalty. Replacement trees are to be paid for at no additional expense to the Owner.TREE PRESERVATION & PROTECTION NOTES:SEEDINGSCHEDULES& NOTESPage 89 of 124 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsSITE CONTEXT 0.2 2/25/2026 Lexington Heights Apts 2/25/2026 GROSS AREA - TOTAL Level Area Level 4 23,617 ft² Level 3 23,617 ft² Level 2 23,617 ft² Level 1 23,600 ft² Level -1 26,488 ft² Grand total 120,939 ft²HWY 35ELEXINGTON AVE S.LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS PARKING PROVIDED: 60 SURFACE FOR NEW BUILDING 43 REMAIN FOR EXISTING BUILDING (103 TOTAL PROPOSED SURFACE LOT) 144 STALLS / 84 UNITS = 1.71 STALLS/UNIT 144 STALLS / 110 BEDROOMS = 1.31 STALLS/BEDROOM EXISTING BUILDING 75 UNITS (120 BEDROOMS) GARAGE STALLS = 75 SURFACE PROPOSED = 45 TOTAL PARKING = 120 STALLS 120 STALLS / 75 UNITS = 1.60 STALLS/UNIT 120 STALLS / 120 BEDROOMS = 1.00 STALLS/BEDROOM PARKING Level Type Count Level -1 Garage Stalls 71 Level -1 Garage Stalls - Tandem 13 84 Level 1 Surface 60 60 144PROPOSED SITEUNIT MIX - GROSS AREA Name Count Bedroo ms Unit Gross Area Total Area %Main Floor 1BR Unit A1 16 16 708 ft² 11,328 ft² 19% Unit A2 4 4 792 ft² 3,167 ft² 5% Unit A3 4 4 709 ft² 2,837 ft² 5% Unit A4 8 8 786 ft² 6,291 ft² 10% 32 32 23,622 ft² 38% 1BR +D Unit B1 30 30 923 ft² 27,690 ft² 36% 30 30 27,690 ft² 36% 2BR Unit C2 4 8 1,154 ft² 4,617 ft² 5% Unit C4 3 6 1,097 ft² 3,290 ft² 4% Unit C5 3 6 1,047 ft² 3,140 ft² 4% Unit C6 4 8 1,286 ft² 5,144 ft² 5% 14 28 16,191 ft² 17% 2BR + D Unit C3 4 8 1,597 ft² 6,389 ft² 5% Unit D1 4 12 1,363 ft² 5,453 ft² 5% 8 20 11,842 ft² 10% Grand total 84 110 79,345 ft² 100% Page 90 of 124 1 2 E X I S T I N G 3 -S T O R Y B U I L D I N G E X I S T I N G 3 -S T O R Y B U I L D I N G E X I S T I N G P O O L B U I L D I N G PROPOSED 4-STORY 84 UNIT BUILDING 4 COLORED SITE PLAN ASPHALT SIDEWALK 1 SIDEWALK 2 GRASS 1 GRASS 2 WATER BUILDING 1 BUILDING ENTRANCE 2 GARAGE ENTRANCE 3 LANDSCAPED COURTYARD - GARAGE BELOW SITE PLAN KEY 4 PATIO AMENITY kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsSITE PLAN 2.0 2/25/2026 1" = 60'-0"1 SD Site Plan Page 91 of 124 6.1 1 6.1 5 6.1 6 6.1 2 6.13 6.1 4 25,064 ft² Parking Garage 416 ft² Trash Color Scheme Legend Circulation Core Garage18'-0"14'-0"18'-0"18'-0"9 '-0 " 9 '-0 " 9 '-0 " 9 '-0 " 9'-0" 9'-0" 9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"9'-0"16'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0" UNEXCAVATED 8'-0"8'-0"8'-0" 13'-8"24'-0"Utility24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"Stair AStair B6.2 1 6.2 2 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsFLOOR PLANS 3.0 2/25/2026 1" = 30'-0"1 Level -1 PARKING Level Type Count Level -1 Garage Stalls 71 Level -1 Garage Stalls - Tandem 13 84 Level 1 Surface 60 60 144 Page 92 of 124 Color Scheme Legend 1BR 1BR +D 2BR 2BR + D Circulation Common Area Core 6.1 1 6.1 5 6.1 6 6.1 2 6.13 6.1 4 PATIO AMENITY 946 ft² WFH / Coffee Bar 700 ft² Fitness 1,097 ft² Club Room 759 ft² Lobby 792 ft² Unit A2 786 ft² Unit A4 1,286 ft² Unit C6 1,597 ft² Unit C3 708 ft² Unit A1 786 ft² Unit A4 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 709 ft² Unit A3 1,154 ft² Unit C2 1,363 ft² Unit D1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 6.2 1 6.2 2 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsFLOOR PLANS 3.1 2/25/2026 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 1 Page 93 of 124 6.1 1 6.1 5 6.1 6 6.1 2 6.13 6.1 4 1,597 ft² Unit C3 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 1,363 ft² Unit D1 1,154 ft² Unit C2 792 ft² Unit A21,286 ft² Unit C6 1,047 ft² Unit C5 923 ft² Unit B1 1,097 ft² Unit C4 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 709 ft² Unit A3 708 ft² Unit A1 786 ft² Unit A4 786 ft² Unit A4 6.2 1 6.2 2 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsFLOOR PLANS 3.2 2/25/2026 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 2 Page 94 of 124 6.1 1 6.1 5 6.1 6 6.1 2 6.13 6.1 4 Color Scheme Legend 1BR 1BR +D 2BR 2BR + D Circulation Core 1,597 ft² Unit C3 708 ft² Unit A1 786 ft² Unit A4 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1786 ft² Unit A4 792 ft² Unit A2 1,286 ft² Unit C6 1,047 ft² Unit C5 708 ft² Unit A1 709 ft² Unit A3 1,154 ft² Unit C2 1,097 ft² Unit C4 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 1,363 ft² Unit D1 6.2 1 6.2 2 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 3 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsFLOOR PLANS 3.3 2/25/2026 Page 95 of 124 6.1 1 6.1 5 6.1 6 6.1 2 6.13 6.1 4 1,597 ft² Unit C3 708 ft² Unit A1 786 ft² Unit A4 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1 923 ft² Unit B1786 ft² Unit A4 792 ft² Unit A2 1,286 ft² Unit C6 1,047 ft² Unit C5 708 ft² Unit A1 709 ft² Unit A3 1,154 ft² Unit C2 1,097 ft² Unit C4 708 ft² Unit A1 708 ft² Unit A1 1,363 ft² Unit D1 6.2 1 6.2 2 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsFLOOR PLANS 3.4 2/25/2026 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 4 Page 96 of 124 Page 97 of 124 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsEXTERIOR MATERIALS 6.0 2/25/2026 EXTERIOR MATERIALS Material Mark Description Image 4.2 04-Brick-SiouxCity-Running-BadlandsVelour 4.3 Environmental Stoneworks - San Domino Grezzo 5.4 Metal - Dark Bronze 7.1 07-Siding-JamesHardie-AlternatingLap-4/4/8-Smoo th-Khaki Brown EXTERIOR MATERIALS Material Mark Description Image 7.10 EDCO Vertical Siding - Cedarwood 7.11 07-Siding-JamesHardie-Lap6Reveal-Cedarmill-Timb er Bark 8 COMPOSITE WINDOWS; BLACK 8.1 08-Glass Page 98 of 124 kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsRENDERINGS 5.0 2/25/2026 Page 99 of 124 COMPLIMENTARY SECONDARY MATERIAL PROMINENT ADDRESS GLASSY ENTRANCE CANOPY ESTABLISHES HORIZONTAL BREAK PROMINENT MAIN ENTRY kaas wilson architects Lexington Heights AptsEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6.2 2/25/2026 NEW BRICK COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING BRICK TONE 4TH FLOOR METAL PANEL SELECTED TO MINIMIZE VISUAL PROMINENCE AND RECEDE WITHIN THE OVERALL MASSING COLOR TONE COMPLIMENTARY EQUAL TWO-LITE FENESTRATION PATTERN SLIDING PATIO DOOR TO PRIVATE DECK SURFACE MOUNTED MECHANICAL TERMINATIONS Page 100 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 9.b REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2026-25 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for 655 Callahan Place [Planning Case No. 2026-04] ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2026-25 Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for M&M Home Contractors to allow for a residential building height of 20-ft at 655 Callahan Place BACKGROUND: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners’ Representative of the property located at 655 Callahan Place, and are requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 20-ft for the construction of a new single-family home located at 655 Callahan Place. The subject property is located on the north side of Callahan Place, a street which is generally west of Two Rivers High School’s football field. The subject property is part of the Willow Spring subdivision, originally platted in 1947. The existing lot is currently vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home which was demolished in 2025. The proposed project is to construct a new 5,621 sq-ft home on the property. While the R-1 district permits a maximum building height of 25 feet, infill development is subject to additional height restrictions per Section 12-4A-7, which limits building height to the average height of the principal structures on the immediately adjacent lots. The applicant is proposing a height of 20 feet, and the adjacent residential homes are both single-level homes estimated to be no taller than 15-ft in height. The ordinance states that when averaging building heights of the adjacent structures, the maximum cannot be set lower than 15-ft. For this new proposed home, the CUP is required because the proposed roof height is taller than the ordinance-set maximum of 15-ft. At the March 31, 2026, Planning Commission meeting, a planning report was presented. A duly noticed public hearing was held, and two persons spoke related to the application. The residents who spoke at the public hearing expressed concerns with the size of the proposed home, and the possibility of shading their yard due to the height and depth of the home, as well as concerns with drainage from the roof and where that may be directed. The applicant Page 101 of 124 was present and available to answer questions of the Commission. The applicant and staff confirmed that the proposed front setback of the home is consistent with adjacent structures. The applicant stated a willingness to discuss the project with adjacent property owners relating to drainage. A copy of the 03/31/2026 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the unapproved minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff recommended approval of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning Commission affirmed the staff recommendation and voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend to the City Council approval of this CUP with findings-of-fact and certain conditions, as outlined in the attached [draft] Resolution. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2026-25 Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Residential Building Height at the Property Located at 655 Callahan Place 2.Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes 3-31-26 3.March 31, 2026, Planning Commission Staff Report CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy Page 102 of 124 Resolution No. 2026-25 Page | 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-25 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 655 CALLAHAN PLACE PLANNING CASE 2026-04 WHEREAS, M&M Home Contractors, (the “Applicant and Owners’ representative”) made an Application for a Conditional Use Permit for residential building height at the property located at 655 Callahan Place, and legally described in Exhibit A (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided LDR-Low Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and zoned R-1 Low Density Residential; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Title 12-4A-7: Structure Height Standards, a Conditional Use Permit is required for new single-family home infill development which exceeds the calculated average height of adjacent structures, and the proposed 20-ft height requires these approvals; and WHEREAS, on March 31, 2026, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit request, whereby planning reports were presented and received by the Commission, and comments from the applicant and public were allowed, and whereupon closing the hearing, the Commission recommended unanimously (5-0 vote) to approve the request from M&M Home Contractors for the Conditional Use Permit, which would allow the proposed height for a new single-family home at 655 Callahan Place, as proposed and presented under Planning Case No. 2026-04, with certain conditions and findings-of-fact to support said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the recommendation from the Planning Commission on Planning Case No. 2026-04 is hereby affirmed, and may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact: 1.The proposed construction of a new single family home is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for property within the R-1 Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 103 of 124 Resolution No. 2026-25 Page | 2 3.The construction of the home as shown in the provided plans represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit requested for the property located at 655 Callahan Place is hereby approved, with the following conditions: 1.A building permit must be approved and issued by the City prior to the commencement of any work. All applicable zoning and building requirements shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 2.The building height shall not exceed 20 feet, as measured per the definition of Building Height in City Code. 3.The building shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and dated 1/29/2026. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April 2026. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 104 of 124 Resolution No. 2026-25 Page | 3 EXHIBIT A Address: 655 Callahan Place PIN: 27-84300-00-280 Legal Description: The East ½ of Lot 28, Willow Spring Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota Page 105 of 124 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES EXCERPT FROM DRAFT/UNAPPROVED 3/31/26 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES B) PLANNING CASE 2026-04 M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 655 CALLAHAN PLACE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the applicant and owner’s representative of the property located at 655 Callahan Place and has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 20 feet for the construction of a new single-family home located at 655 Callahan Place. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson asked about the roof height of the two neighboring properties. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided information on the estimates that were used to determine the average of 15 feet. Commissioner Corbett opened the public hearing. Brian Ross, 653 Callahan Place, stated that he lives to the east of this property and expressed concerns with the height of the building proposed. He commented that this home is being setback further on the property, and he expressed concerns with the shadowing that could occur on his property. He asked that the build revise their plan to a lesser building height. Rosemary Husbands, 659 Callahan Place, stated that she lives to the west of the subject property and asked that the builder consider the trees along the property line. She wanted to ensure that the root systems were not damaged during construction. She commented on the drainage patterns from the previous home and expressed concerns that there would be more runoff from a larger roof. She asked that the runoff from this property not go onto her property. She asked that there be consideration for low wattage lighting to ensure that a building of this size remain understanded rather than overstated. She did not want to see bright spotlights or lighting that could impose itself on wildlife or the native habitat. Mike Fritz, M&M Homes, stated that their goal is to work with the neighbors to ensure there are no issues and/or address any existing issues. He stated that they are pulled all the way to the front setback, and 93.4 feet remains from the home to the back of the lot. He stated that the proposed home would be a 4,200 square foot rambler and provided information on the roof pitches. He stated that this application is for a CUP for the building height Page 106 of 124 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES and noted that he would be willing to speak with the neighbor to address her concerns with the trees and runoff. He stated that they tried to manage the front and back setbacks as best they could. Commissioner Johnson asked if the front setback is in alignment with the other two homes. Mr. Fritz replied that the front setback is 50.5. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek explained that the garage extends in front of the home, and the front of the garage is evenly aligned with the homes on either side. Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the proposed building height. Mr. Fritz replied that the tallest midpoint is 17.6. He recognized that both neighboring homes are around 13 feet, which is under the Code maximum. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Commissioner Corbett asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER NATH MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER UDELL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Nath noted that the request is related to the peak in the middle of the home, which should alleviate the issue of shade mentioned by the neighbor. He supported the request. Commissioner Johnson stated that while she does have concerns for the neighbors, she was happy to hear that the builder was willing to work with them. She noted that this request falls within the requirements of the City Code. COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GOLDADE, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY M&M HOME CONTRACTORS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 655 CALLAHAN PLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED AND ISSUED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. ALL APPLICABLE ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 2. THE BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 20 FEET, AS MEASURED PER THE DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT IN CITY CODE. 3. THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED AND DATED JANUARY 29, 2026. AYES: 5 Page 107 of 124 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES NAYS: 0 Community Development Manager Sarah Madden advised the City Council would consider this application at its April 7, 2026, meeting. Page 108 of 124 Planning Commission Meeting Date: March 31, 2026 Agenda Item: CASE No. 2026-04 Conditional Use Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for residential building height for a new single-family home at 655 Callahan Place Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners’ Representative of the property located at 655 Callahan Place, and has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 20-ft for the construction of a new single-family home located at 655 Callahan Place. A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice letters were mailed to all surrounding properties within 350-feet of the subject property. No written public comments were received as of the submittal of this report. Background: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a new single-family home to exceed the calculated average building height required for infill development in the R-1 Low Density Residential zoning district. The subject property is located on the north side of Callahan Place, a street which is generally west of Two Rivers High School’s football field. The subject property is part of the Willow Spring subdivision, originally platted in 1947. The existing lot is currently vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home which was demolished in 2025. The proposed project is to construct a new 5,621 sq-ft home with a walkout basement on the property. The site plan for the proposed home shows the location as meeting all minimum required setbacks for the R-1 zoning district. While the R-1 district permits a maximum building height of 25 feet, infill development is subject to additional height restrictions per Section 12-4A-7 (listed below), which limits building height to the average height of the principal structures on the immediately adjacent lots. The applicant is proposing a height of 20 feet, and the adjacent residential homes are both single- level homes estimated to be no taller than 15-ft in height. The ordinance states that when averaging building heights of the adjacent structures, the maximum cannot be set lower than 15-ft. For this new proposed home, the CUP is required because the proposed roof height is taller than the set maximum of 15-ft. "12-4A-7: STRUCTURE HEIGHT STANDARDS: C. Height Standards for Infill Development in R-1 Zoning District. The following height Page 109 of 124 standards are established for any infill lot in the R-1 Zoning District: 1. The permitted maximum height shall be determined by taking the average of the two adjacent principal residential structures, but in no case shall the maximum be set lower than 15-feet. 2. To exceed the maximum height established in C.1, a Conditional Use Permit must be obtained. In no case shall the permitted height exceed 25-feet unless a Variance is also obtained." The proposed roof pitch and other design features of the new single-family home are consistent with R-1 Low Density Residential zoning district standards. Analysis: Pursuant to Title 12-5B-5, the city recognizes that the development and execution of Zoning Code is based upon the division of the city into districts within which regulations are specified. It is further recognized that there are special or conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public need for the particular location. To provide for these needs, the city may approve a conditional use for those uses and purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to ensure that the purpose and intent of this chapter is effectively carried out. The City may grant a conditional use provided the proposed use demonstrates the following: a.Use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, b.Use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, c.Use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value, and d.Use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. A-C) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; nor depreciate surrounding property value. Staff Response: The proposed building height remains below the R-1 district’s maximum permitted height of 25 feet and meets all applicable zoning standards for roof pitch. No adverse impacts to health, safety, or welfare have been identified. The proposed height increase does not alter the single-family residential use or generate additional traffic. Access and onsite parking remain consistent with code requirements. The proposed structure is compatible in scale and character with surrounding development. Both adjacent homes are rambler/ranch style single-story homes, and the proposed height of 20-ft is not inconsistent with that scale. The new home will meet setback standards for single-family development in R-1. Staff finds no evidence that the height request as proposed in this CUP application would negatively impact property values. D) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: The project supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for neighborhood reinvestment and compatibility in infill development. The proposed height is modest, reasonable, and consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Page 110 of 124 Alternatives: 1. Approve the CUP request for 655 Callahan Place, which would allow for the construction of a new single-family home based on the findings-of-fact that the proposed project is compliant with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, with certain conditions; or 2. Deny the CUP request for 655 Callahan Place, based on the revised or amended findings-of- fact that the application does not meet certain policies and standards of City Code as determined by the Planning Commission; or 3. Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant; Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota State Statute 15.99. Staff Recommendation: Attachments: 1. Findings of Fact for Approval 2. Site Location Map 3. Site Plan 4. 655 Callahan Place - Construction Plans, dated 1/29/26 Page 111 of 124 Planning Case 2026-04 (CUP for 655 Callahan Place) Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 655 Callahan Place The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed construction of a new single family home is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for property within the R-1 Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The construction of the home as shown in the provided plans represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood. Page 112 of 124 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 666!" " "!!" "" "! ³ " " *" "" " " ³ "" "6666666666666666666666!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 648 646 1871 1861675 647651653 652 655 656 659 660666 681 685 672 645 646676654650 672 668 664 658 688 682 1851 696 657 675 663 653 649 647 645679 642 651 687 1852 1862645 MARI E AVE CALLAHAN PL W E S L E Y C T Nearmap U S Inc, Dakota County, MN Sit e Location/Aerial Map655 Callahan Place Date: 3/27/2026 City ofMendotaHeights0125 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 113 of 124 Page 114 of 124 SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG. 2385 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 877 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3262 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2135 SQ.FT.UNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 224 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 2359 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:4520 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 5621 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.SHEET INDEX::::1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 16" O.C. WITH DOUBLE TOP PLATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.(U.N.O.)2. WALL FRAMING SHALL BE S.P.F. STUD GRADE ORBETTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.3. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE PER PLAN.4. ALL EXTERIOR HEADERS SHALL HAVE (1)2X6BEARING STUD & (1) 2X6 FULL HEIGHT KING STUDON EACH SIDE U.N.O. (REVIEW PLANS)5. ALL INTERNAL HEADERS & BEAMS SHALL HAVE (1)2X6 OR (1)2X4 BEARING STUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O.6. EXTERIOR SHEATHING SHALL BE 7/16" MATERIALCONSISTING OF ORIENTED STRAND BOARD (OSB).ALL FLOOR AND CEILING SYSTEMS TO BECHECKED AND DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNATEDMANUFACTURER. FLOOR PLANS TO BE ON SITE.7. HEADER SIZES ARE TO BE USED PER PLAN AND DEVIATION FROM ANY SIZE MUST BE APPROVEDBY DESIGNERS.8. PRESSURE TREADED WOOD IS TO BE USEDWHERE WOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETEAND AT 2X6 MUD SILL. TREATED MEMBERS TO BES.Y.P.#2 OR BETTER.9. FOR OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS OR WALLSWITH LATERAL LOADING:a. 0'-0" - 4'-0" = 1 JACK STUDb. 4'-0" - 8'-0" = 2 JACK STUDSc. 8'-0" - 12'-0" = 3 JACK STUDSd. 12' OR GREATER AT OPENINGS = CONSULT ENGINEERING10.POSTS CALLED OUT ARE NUMBER OF REQUIRED TRIMMER/JACK STUDS PER SIDE OF OPENING.1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONSYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED FOR A 2000 P.S.F.SOIL.2. FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE FULL HEIGHT ATUNBALANCED FILL GREATER THAN 3'4".3. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MIN. @ 6' O.C.MAX. 12" MIN. FROM EACH END. MIN. OF 2 BOLTS INEACH SILL PLATE (REFER TO STRUCTURALPAGES) OR SEPARATE REBAR DESIGNS BYOTHERS.4. PAD FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IS TO BELOCATED (3") FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING TYP. (WHEN REQUIRED) REFER TO STRUCTURALPAGES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONREGARDING RE-BAR/ETC.5.1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AND RIMS TO HAVE AMINIMUM RATING OF R-20.2. ALL ATTIC SPACES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM RATING OF R-49.3. ALL FLOOR SPACES OVER UNCONDITIONEDSPACE OR CANTILEVERED ARE TO BE INSULATEDTO MIN. R-30.CCOVERSHEETSCALED PRINT @ 24X361. CEILINGS ARE TO HAVE 5/8" NON-SAG GYPSUMBOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS ARE TO HAVE 1/2" GYPSUM BOARDON INTERIORS U.NO.3. GARAGE CEILING AND WALLS THAT ADJOINHOUSE WALLS ARE TO BE 5/8" GYPSUM BOARDPER CODE.1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE DOUBLEPANE GLASS PANELS WITH LOW-E RATINGS.2. WINDOWS WITHIN 24" OF A DOOR SWING MUSTBE TEMPERED PER CODE.3. ANY WINDOW ABOVE A TUB/WET AREA MUSTBE TEMPERED PER CODE.4. ANY WINDOW WITHIN A STAIRWAY MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE, UNLESS 4' ABOVEHEIGHT OF WALKING PATH.5. WINDOW GLAZING MUST BE AT LEAST 18" A.F.F.WHEN WINDOW IS ABOVE 6' FROM GRADE. IFWITHIN 18", WINDOW MUST BE TEMPERED.6. ALL BEDROOMS TO HAVE AT LEAST ONEWINDOW THAT HAS A CLEAR EGRESS OPENINGOF 5.7 SQ. FT. WITH MIN. DIMENSIONS OF 24" INHEIGHT & 20" IN WIDTH, SILL HEIGHT NOT TOBE GREATER THAN 44" A.F.F.7. WINDOWS WITH SILLS WITHIN 2' OF THEFLOOR THEY SERVE AND ARE 72" ABOVE GRADE MUST EITHER HAVE A FALL PREVENTION OR OPENING LIMITER DEVICEPER CODE.1. ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICALEQUIPMENT TO BE VERIFIED AND INSTALLEDPER CODE BY APPROVED TRADES ANDINSTALLERS.2. HVAC CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LAYOUT FORDUCT-RUNS BEFORE INSTALLATION, IFMODIFICATION IS REQUIRED, REPORTINFORMATION/CHANGES TO CONTRACTOR &LITTFIN DESIGN.C COVERA1 FRONT ELEVATIONA2 REAR ELEVATIONA3 LEFT ELEVATIONA4 RIGHT ELEVATIONA5 ROOF PLANA6 FOUNDATION PLANA7 FINISHED BASEMENT PLANA8 FIRST FLOOR PLANSINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE IRC-1-2020 MINNESOTA STATE RESIDENTIAL CODE-2023 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE MECHANICAL & FUEL GAS CODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE-2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODEDESIGNED WITH 2000 PSF SOILS, ALL FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION MUST FACTOR IN THIS AT AMINIMUM.DESIGNED WITH "EXPOSURE B" CLASSIFICATIONS AND WIND GUSTS OF 115 MPH PER 2020 MNRESIDENTIAL CODE REGULATIONS.-ALL FOUNDATION WALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION USED TO CONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATIONSYSTEM IS TO BE ON SITE WHENPOURING OR BUILDING WALLS.-ALL STRUCTURAL BEAMS, POSTS & TALL WALLS ARE TO BE BUILT PER I-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERSSPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSS SPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE ON SITE DURINGINSTALLATION.Page 115 of 124 6' CONCRETE STAIRS W/ 7 34 " MAX. RISERS & 12"TREADS INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAIL WHEN MORETHAN 3 RISERS OR 30", BUILD STAIRS INTO PORCHSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION1METAL ROOFMETAL ROOF(3) 2'4"X4' FX WINDOWW/ BLACKBACKER(3) 2'4"X4' FX WINDOWW/ BLACKBACKER5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"PITCH CHANGEBOXED OUT GABLE AREA HELD OFF GABLE WALL 8"W/ 4" TRIM AROUND - ABOVE (4) 4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS - TYP. PER SPEC - SPACED AS SHOWNBOXED OUT GABLE AREA HELD OFF GABLE WALL 8"W/ 4" TRIM AROUND - ABOVE (4) 4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS - TYP. PER SPEC - SPACED AS SHOWNBOXED OUT GABLE AREA HELD OFF GABLE WALL 8"W/ 4" TRIM AROUND - ABOVE (4) 4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS - TYP. PER SPEC - SPACED AS SHOWN1'X1' STRAIGHT COLUMN W/ 8"CAP & 8" BASE, PER DETAIL.2'X2' DECO. BRACKETPER DETAIL1'X1' DECO. BRACKETPER DETAIL12" TRIM BOARDPER SPEC.5'-2 1/4"16'-10 1/2"21'-6"6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"9'-8 1/4"1'-8 1/4"9'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"6"10'-9 1/2"1'-7"2'-5"2'-5"4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS,SPACED AS SHOWN12" TRIM W/5" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.20'-0"8'-0"SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET32" 45 DEGREECHAMFER ENDS2' x 2' BRACKET MADE OF 4" x 6" CEDARW/ 45 DEGREE ANGLED AND ARCHEDCENTER ELEMENT W/ 2" 45 O CHAMFER ENDSAS SHOWN - PER SPEC3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN DETAIL2CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPBASECENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.1'-0"7 1/4"7 1/4"SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1'X1' DECORATIVE BRACKET42" 45 DEGREECHAMFER ENDS1' x 1' BRACKET MADE OF 3" x 4" CEDARW/ 45 DEGREE ANGLED AND ARCHEDCENTER ELEMENT W/ 2" 45 O CHAMFER ENDSAS SHOWN - PER SPEC1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.A.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSD.) 4" TRIM PER SPEC.A.) 6" TRIM PER SPEC.B.) WINDOW PER PLANB.) 6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.E.) SIDING PER PLANDRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A1FRONTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 116 of 124 1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REAR ELEVATION1SCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERS36" CODE RAILING 36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8"X8" BUILT-UPSTRAIGHTCOLUMN,PER DETAIL.8"X8" BUILT-UPSTRAIGHTCOLUMN,PER DETAIL.5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"PITCH CHANGEBOXED OUT GABLE AREA HELD OFF GABLE WALL 8"W/ 4" TRIM AROUND - ABOVE (4) 4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS - TYP. PER SPEC - SPACED AS SHOWNBOXED OUT GABLE AREA HELD OFF GABLE WALL 8"W/ 4" TRIM AROUND - ABOVE (4) 4"X4"X4" DECORATIVECEDAR BLOCKS - TYP. PER SPEC - SPACED AS SHOWN12" TRIM BOARDPER SPEC.12" TRIM BOARDPER SPEC.8'-0"6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"10'-7 1/4"10" TRIM BOARDPER SPEC.8'-0"6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"2'-5"2'-5"SECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0" 8"X8" COLUMN DETAIL2CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.A.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSD.) 4" TRIM PER SPEC.A.) 6" TRIM PER SPEC.B.) WINDOW PER PLANB.) 6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.E.) SIDING PER PLANDRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A2REARELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 117 of 124 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION1SCREENBY OTHERS36" CODE RAILING2'X2' DECO. BRACKETPER DETAIL8"X8" BUILT-UPSTRAIGHTCOLUMN,PER DETAIL.1'X1' STRAIGHT COLUMN W/ 8"CAP & 8" BASE, PER DETAIL.1'X1' DECO. BRACKETPER DETAIL12" TRIM BOARDPER SPEC.6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"9'-8 1/4"8'-0"6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"1'-0"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET32" 45 DEGREECHAMFER ENDS2' x 2' BRACKET MADE OF 4" x 6" CEDARW/ 45 DEGREE ANGLED AND ARCHEDCENTER ELEMENT W/ 2" 45 O CHAMFER ENDSAS SHOWN - PER SPECSECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0" 8"X8" COLUMN DETAIL2CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1'X1' DECORATIVE BRACKET42" 45 DEGREECHAMFER ENDS1' x 1' BRACKET MADE OF 3" x 4" CEDARW/ 45 DEGREE ANGLED AND ARCHEDCENTER ELEMENT W/ 2" 45 O CHAMFER ENDSAS SHOWN - PER SPEC-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.A.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSD.) 4" TRIM PER SPEC.A.) 6" TRIM PER SPEC.B.) WINDOW PER PLANB.) 6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.E.) SIDING PER PLAN3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN DETAIL5CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPBASECENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.1'-0"7 1/4"7 1/4"DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A3LEFTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 118 of 124 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION16"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"9'-8 1/4"8"X8" BUILT-UPSTRAIGHTCOLUMN,PER DETAIL.SCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERS2'X2' DECO. BRACKETPER DETAIL8'-0"6"10'-1 1/8"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"6" TRIM PER SPEC.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET32" 45 DEGREECHAMFER ENDS2' x 2' BRACKET MADE OF 4" x 6" CEDARW/ 45 DEGREE ANGLED AND ARCHEDCENTER ELEMENT W/ 2" 45 O CHAMFER ENDSAS SHOWN - PER SPECSECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0" 8"X8" COLUMN DETAIL2CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.A.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSD.) 4" TRIM PER SPEC.A.) 6" TRIM PER SPEC.B.) WINDOW PER PLANB.) 6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.E.) SIDING PER PLANDRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A4RIGHTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 119 of 124 PITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGE4:12SLOPE4:12SLOPERIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENT12:12SLOPERIDGE VENTPITCH CHANGERIDGE VENT8:12SLOPE8:12SLOPE8:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE8:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE12:12SLOPE2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP9" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP6" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-6" TYP1'-0" TYP6" TYPR ID G E RIDGERIDGER ID G ERIDGE RADON -OUTV A L L E YVALLEYVALLEYVALLEY V A L L E Y VALLEYRIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGEV A L L E Y VALLEYVALLEYV A L L E Y VALLEYSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"ROOF PLAN16" TYPROOFSADDLE1:300 CALCULATION FOR ROOFVENTING. ROOF AREA IS 4211 SQ FT.,INSTALL CORRECT # OF VENTS PERSQ. FT. STATED ABOVE IN THESEAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONS.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A5ROOFPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 120 of 124 FOUNDATION PLAN1RADON -UP36" CODE RAILINGSTEP FULL FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP FULL FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.UP (16) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING8765432191011124" CONCRETE SLAB W/FIBERMESH REINFORCEMENTOVER COMPACTED FILLFOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8 SILLPLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAM INSULATIONPER DETAILS. AREAS ADJACENT TOSTOOPS, GARAGE, OR WALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVERED SILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8 SILLPLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAM INSULATIONPER DETAILS. AREAS ADJACENT TOSTOOPS, GARAGE, OR WALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVERED SILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8 SILLPLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAM INSULATIONPER DETAILS. AREAS ADJACENT TOSTOOPS, GARAGE, OR WALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVERED SILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8 SILLPLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAM INSULATIONPER DETAILS. AREAS ADJACENT TOSTOOPS, GARAGE, OR WALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVERED SILLS.4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER OVER2" RIGID FOAM UNDER SLABOVER 6" GRANULARCOMPACTED FILLC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC J C JC JC JC JC J C J C JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JDEPRESS T/WALLEL = (-) 0'-6"DEPRESS T/WALLEL = (-) 0'-6"2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGE2" SLAB LEDGEMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVER6"10"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"10"6"8"8"8"2"8"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"6"8"8"8"7'-4 1/2"11'-9 1/2"9'-0"12'-2 3/4"6'-3 1/4"5'-0"5'-0"8'-0"8'-0"4'-9"4'-9"6'-7 3/4"8'-4 1/4"6'-2"2"2"21'-0"25'-6"2'-0"8'-2"20'-4"8'-2"13'-6"25'-6"2'-6"18'-0"2'-6"6"9'-0"1'-6"18'-0"23'-0"11'-0"77'-6"2'-0"2'-0"10'-0"5'-10"8"8"14'-10"8"6'-9"8"6'-9"8"8"7'-3"8"7'-5"16'-0"70'-8"12'-8"15'-6"18'-6"15'-6"15'-6"77'-8"6'-6"70'-8"18'-8"4'-3 1/2"16'-0"15'-0"5'-8 1/2"17'-8 1/2"3'-2"5'-4"9'-10"GIRDER TRUSS ABV.C JC JC JC J10 1/2"10'-1"29'-8"8"2'-0"1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER. (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARETRIMMERS, MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONSTO BE INCLUDED AS WELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREASAND DOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAMEMATERIAL AS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE,BLOCKING MAY BE "BROKEN" BETWEEN LEVELS U.N.O.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER, SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB ORPLYWOOD SHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BEREFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKINGW/ CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD. ATL: 16 GA 1-34",3" @ EDGES/ 6" AT FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILEDOR SCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C.@ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10.REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONALFRAMING INFORMATION.1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOILCONDITION- VERIFY ON SITE.2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FAN1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING, GRADE AT FRONT ORFRONT OF GARAGE DOORS IS CONSIDERED 0'0" ON THISFOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.SDSDSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG. 2385 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 877 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3262 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2135 SQ.FT.UNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 224 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 2359 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:4520 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 5621 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A6FOUNDATIONPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 121 of 124 CONCRETELVPWOODLVP29'X32'7"/26'3"FINISHED BASEMENT PLAN1CARPET12'X13'CARPET12'11"X12'1"TILETILERUBBER11'8"X18'2"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"4 1/2"6"4 1/2"6"7'-4 1/2"5'-3 1/2"6'-6"6'-3 1/2"6'-5 3/4"6'-3 1/4"5'-0"5'-0"8'-0"8'-0"4'-9"4'-9"6'-7 3/4"8'-4 1/4"12'-9 1/2"2'-8 1/2"5'-9"12'-9"12'-8"15'-6"18'-6"16'-0"15'-0"8'-2"2'-0"2'-0"10'-0"10'-9 1/2"9'-6"6'-2"3'-11 3/4"7'-0"10'-0 1/4"4 1/2"4 1/2"2'-1 1/2"4'-0"5'-10"5'-8"2'-11 1/2"4'-3 1/2"22'-5"11'-1"3'-11 1/2"5'-3 1/2"5"3'-11 1/2"9'-3 1/2"9 1/4"4'-0"4'-3 1/2"4'-7 3/4"4'-6 3/4"5'-9 1/2"3'-11"2'-0"3'-0"3'-0"1'-6"1'-4 1/2"3'-6"1'-9"1'-10 1/2"5 1/2"12'-0"9'-3"5'-9 1/2"12'-10 1/2"2'-2"6'-5 1/2"6'-5"3'-0"12'-4"11'-9 1/2"7'-2"7'-3"6'-6 1/2"2'-10 1/2"3'-2 1/2"1'-0 1/4"4'-2 3/4"3'-0 1/2"5'-8 1/2"5'-10"8"8"14'-10"8"6'-9"8"6'-9"8"8"7'-3"8"7'-5"21'-0"2"3'-0"5'-6"3'-0"5'-0"(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)RODRADON -UP36" CODE RAILING(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD10"(1)S./(1)R.1'-10"FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ LOOKOUTFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFF WALL 1" &SHEETROCK FINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS- FINISH W/ WOOD CAP AS NEEDEDSTEP FULL FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ FULLFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFFWALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS.FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ FULLFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFFWALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS.STEP FULL FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ LOOKOUTFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFF WALL 1" &SHEETROCK FINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS- FINISH W/ WOOD CAP AS NEEDEDSTEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.3'-9 1/2"5'-3 1/2"UP (16) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING8765432191011126'-6"15'-6"15'-6"1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER. (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARETRIMMERS, MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONSTO BE INCLUDED AS WELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREASAND DOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAMEMATERIAL AS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE,BLOCKING MAY BE "BROKEN" BETWEEN LEVELS U.N.O.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER, SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB ORPLYWOOD SHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BEREFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKINGW/ CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD. ATL: 16 GA 1-34",3" @ EDGES/ 6" AT FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILEDOR SCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C.@ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10.REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONALFRAMING INFORMATION.1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOILCONDITION- VERIFY ON SITE.2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FAN1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING, GRADE AT FRONT ORFRONT OF GARAGE DOORS IS CONSIDERED 0'0" ON THISFOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.SDSDSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG.2385 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 877 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3262 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2135 SQ.FT.UNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 224 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 2359 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:4520 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 5621 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A7FINISHEDBASEMENTPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 122 of 124 TILEWOODWOODTILEWOOD15'x15'8"WOOD18'X22'TILEWOODTILETILEWOOD6'X12'WOODWOOD12'3"X12'FIRST FLOOR PLAN1CONCRETE33'X25'6"6"5 1/2"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"5 1/2"6"6"6"6"5 1/2"6"6"6"6"2'-0"11'-3 1/2"3'-7 1/2"3'-10 1/2"7'-6 1/4"7'-5 3/4"9'-6 1/4"8'-11 3/4"5'-6"4'-6"8'-0"8'-0"8"1'-6"8"3'-0"8"8"4'-3 1/4"8"4'-3 1/2"8"4'-3 1/4"8"8"3'-4"8"3'-4"4'-0"8'-0"4'-0"6"6"6"2'-6"8'-0"2'-3 1/2"9'-8 1/4"5'-2 1/4"12'-9 1/2"14'-10 1/2"25'-0"16'-0"52'-8"2'-0"70'-8"2'-0"7'-6"5'-8"15'-0"28'-2"18'-6"15'-6"15'-6"3'-7 1/2"12'-4 1/2"16'-0"14'-8"6'-6"10'-0"2'-0"30'-8"1'-0"7'-0"13'-6"7'-4"8"8"8'-4"9'-0"4'-0"7'-0"5'-6"4'-11 1/2"4'-7"6'-5 1/2"6"4'-3 1/2"9'-10 1/2"1'-0"16'-0"5 1/2"5'-6"5'-6"5 1/2"3'-7 1/2"3'-7 1/2"3'-1 1/2"3'-7 1/2"4'-8 3/4"4'-8 3/4"3'-9 1/2"9'-11"3'-7"1'-0"7'-3"1'-11"6'-9"3 1/2"9'-2"17'-3 1/2"1'-0"15'-11"26'-9"2'-6"18'-0"2'-6"6"9'-0"1'-6"23'-0"11'-0"18'-0"8'-0"2'-0"70'-8"77'-8"77'-8"3'-2 1/2"1'-7 1/4"6'-4"1'-8 1/4"9 1/4"8'-10 1/2"4'-3 1/2"10'-2"3'-0"4'-0 1/2"9'-2"2'-3 1/2"7'-6 1/2"7'-5 1/2"2'-0"1'-9 3/4"7'-3 1/4"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-0"5 1/2"5 1/2"5 1/2"9 1/4"9 1/4"3'-0"4'-6"2'-2 1/2"5 1/2"6'-3 1/2"7'-0"5'-9"6'-0"5'-0"6'-0"10'-0"13'-6"3'-10 1/2"1'-6"6'-0"4'-0"5'-0"9"5'-9 1/2"7'-0"2'-7 3/4"4'-9 3/4"7'-5"TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP. TEMP.TEMP.2'-6"2'-0"11'-8 1/2"2'-0"2'-0"11'-0 1/2"2'-0"5'-6"7 1/4"5'-9 1/2"7 1/4"7'-0"5 1/2"2'-0 1/2"5'-2 1/2"2'-0"2'-0"13'-3 1/2"2'-0"(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD4'-0"3'-8 1/2"RADON -UP2'-6 3/4"36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILINGASSUME STONE TOCEILING FOR FLOORLOADING @ F.P.FLOOR MANUFACTURERTO ASSUME ADDITIONALWEIGHT @ COUNTERTOPSASSUME STONE TOCEILING FOR FLOORLOADING @ F.P.4:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE4' WIDE CEDAR STAIRS W/ 7-3/4" MAX. RISERS& 10" TREADS - INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAILWHEN MORE THAN 3 RISERS OR 30"6' CONCRETE STAIRS W/ 7 34 " MAX. RISERS & 12"TREADS INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAIL WHEN MORETHAN 3 RISERS OR 30", BUILD STAIRS INTO PORCHDN (16) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING9101112131415168765432ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.15'-0"1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER.2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.4. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREAS ANDDOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAME MATERIALAS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE.5. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER,SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.6. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB OR PLYWOODSHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BE REFERRED TO AS1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).7. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKING W/CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD.8. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILED ORSCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ ADHESIVE PERSPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12" O.C.@ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).9. REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMINGINFORMATION.1. ALL NON-BEARING FRAMING IS TO BE 16" O.C.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS TO HAVE A DOUBLE TOP PLATEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X6 WOODSTUDS WITH 7/16" OSB SHEATHING, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.4. ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X4 WOODSTUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5. ALL COLUMN SIZES ARE TO BE CONTINUEDTHROUGH FLOOR TRUSS SPACES WHENSPANNING MORE THAN 1 FLOOR.6. ALL WOOD MATERIALS ARE TO BE PROTECTEDPER CODE & MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS WHILEBEING STORED ON SITE.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FAN1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING GRADE ISCONSIDERED 0'0" ON THIS FOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARETO BE ILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE ATALL STAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TOCONTINUE TO LANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OFSTAIRS. CONTRACTOR & INSTALLER TO VERIFY IFADDITIONAL GRASPABLE HANDRAIL IS INSTALLEDOR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAIL TO CONTINUE.4.12" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDEOF STAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARINGWALL, 16" O.C. STUDS6. INDICATES EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS SPACED AT 12" O.C. 1.55E TIMBERSTRANDMATERIAL OR BETTER (2-PLY TIMBER-STRANDKING STUDS @ EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS INWALL).7. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOORSYSTEM PER IRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12"GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38" STRUCTURAL BOARDADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4 MIN. MATERIAL,PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING, SEPARATINGAREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.SDSDSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG.2385 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 877 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3262 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2135 SQ.FT.UNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 224 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 2359 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:4520 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 5621 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:1−29−26LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.A8FIRST FLOORPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 123 of 124 This page is intentionally left blank 9.c REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 2026 AGENDA ITEM: Municipal Campus Project Update ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City Administrator ACTION REQUEST: Informational. A project update will be provided by city staff and/or ICS. BACKGROUND: The Mendota Heights Municipal Campus project is the construction of a new city hall/police facility and the re-envisioning of the existing site to meet the current and future needs of Mendota Heights residents. The new building will replace the current facility, which faces significant health, safety, infrastructure, security and accessibility challenges. The project aims to create a modern, welcoming, and resilient civic hub that supports city operations and public safety. Key goals include improved safety and security, inclusive and accessible design, flexible and functional spaces, and responsible, sustainable use of public resources. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: None for this project update. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 124 of 124