2009-08-04 City Council mintuesAugust 4, 2009
Page 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota
Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Huber called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The
following members were present: Councilmembers
Duggan, Krebsbach, Schneeman and Vitelli.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience and staff recited the Pledge of
Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
'Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Schneeman moved adoption of the agenda
as presented.
Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the minutes of
the regular meeting held on July 21, 2009 as corrected.
Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent
calendar as presented, pulling items j and k for further
discussion, and authorization for execution of any
necessary documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgement of the Minutes from the July 28,
2009 Planning Commission.
b. Acknowledgement of the June 2009 Fire Department
Report.
c. Acknowledgement of the June 2009 Treasurer's Report.
d. Acknowledgement of the July 2009 Building Activity
Report.
e. Acknowledgement of a memo regarding the St. Thomas
Academy Airdome.
August 4, 2009
Page 2
f. Acknowledgement of the Public Safety Systems
Funding Update.
g. Acknowledgement of the Linder's Greenhouses Report.
h. Authorization for Temporary Liquor License for Holy
Family Maronite Catholic Church.
i. Authorization for Purchase Order for Storm Sewer
Repair on Chippewa Avenue and Junction Lane.
j. Approval of Sign Permit Request for 750 Highway 110
— Mendota Plaza.
k. Approval of Contract for Pilot Knob Phase I Overlook
Construction.
1. Adoption of Resolution No. 09 -63: "RESOLUTION
SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN
EASEMENT VACATION AT LOT 2, BLOCK 1,
MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK, 4TH
ADDITION."
m. Approval of Contractors List, dated July 31, 2009.
n. Approval of the List of Claims, dated July 31, 2009,
totaling $194,788.59.
Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan asked to comment on item d and
said he has asked staff to include 2007 as well as 2008 as
they look back at numbers, as 2008 is a bit misleading,
handing out a document that is easier to read.
Councilmember Schneeman thanked Councilmember
Duggan for bringing this up as she had difficulty in reading
the original report as well.
Councilmember Duggan referred to item 1 and pointed out
some language changes that he suggested.
Councilmember Krebsbach referred to item j and asked
Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek how long
the signs will be up. Mr. Sedlacek reviewed the sign
sizes. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if there is a time
limit for the big leasing sign on the former furniture store.
Mr. Sedlacek stated that the "v" shaped sign can be up for
three months. Mr. Sedlacek said the property owners are
proposing to have the leasing office as a use of the former
furniture store space. The sign is an identification sign and
they propose to have the sign up as long as it is a leasing
office and the city cannot regulate the content of this sign
August 4, 2009
Page 3
or how long it can be up. This sign will be indicating that
leasing office for the center.
Councilmember Schneeman said the pictures were not very
good.
Mr. Sedlacek said the signage meets the standards that the
city approved in the planned unit development.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked why the landscaping
buckets were included. Mr. Sedlacek said the property
owner felt it would be useful in front of the leasing office
and around the temporary signage. Councilmember
Schneeman said these are just samples.
Councilmember Duggan moved to approve the Sign Permit
Request for 750 Highway 110 — Mendota Plaza as
presented.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan asked to have item k pulled for
discussion and said that he was not aware that the council
had approved the seven rocks, and said his concern was
that if the council had given general approvals to some
areas, he would like to have staff bring this back for review
to see what might be added later on so that the council can
give their input.
Councilmember Krebsbach said this is a good idea and that
they can give a comprehensive look at what has been
proposed.
Councilmember Schneeman said she thought the council
had that at one time. Councilmember Duggan said there
was, but there were some general approvals but not
specific ones.
Councilmember Schneeman moved to approve the Contract
for Pilot Knob Phase I Overlook Construction.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
2008 AUDIT REPORT
August 4, 2009
Page 4
Mayor Huber said Lambert Dirks is celebrating twenty
years with the city, which is not a remarkable tenure,
except for the fact that today is Lambert's 80th birthday.
Mayor Huber, on behalf of himself, the city council, and
city staff, wished Lambert a very happy birthday and
expressed appreciation for all his years with the city.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker introduced Tom
Hodnefield, who said the audit has been completed and the
city's financial reports were dated and issued on June 26,
2009. The reports were reviewed in detail with
management prior to the issuance and were distributed to
the city council.
Mr. Hodnefield said they have not found any deficiencies
that are required to be reported, noting that the auditor does
not audit the internal controls or give opinions, but they
have to give an understanding and note any findings. Mr.
Hodnefield said they have not found any findings.
Mr. Hodnefield reviewed the reports and stood for
questions.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if there were any
findings or statements acknowledging that the city staff is
paying themselves ahead of schedule as was found in other
cities, and to make sure there is the determination that the
city of Mendota Heights has not done so. Mr. Hodnefield
said their reports do not look for that type of activity.
Councilmember Schneeman asked if it would be reported if
someone noticed that this was the case. Mr. Hodnefield
said the reports would show that finding if it had occurred,
adding that there are no adjusted or corrected financial
statements.
Mr. Hodnefield pointed out the street lighting fund had a
decrease in each of the last four years, and that it has a fund
deficiency that has accumulated up to $43,500 roughly at
the end of 2008. Mr. Hodnefield recommended that this be
monitored. The sewer /utility fund has shown some
decreases as well in the net asset balance and cash balance.
This fund does not have a deficiency yet but there have
been some fairly significant declines in available cash over
the last several years, and recommended that this fund also
be monitored.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HEARING: 694 WENTWORTH
AVENUE ASSESSMENT
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
August 4, 2009
Page 5
The engineering fund has a deficit of $200,000, but that is
internal service funds to allocate resources, incurring more
expenses than are charged to other funds. This will be
caught up as soon as building projects pickup.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked for a definition of
infrastructure. Mr. Hodnefield said these are things that are
of value to the city or local government (roads, bridges,
sidewalks, etc.).
Councilmember Schneeman moved to accept the audit
report as presented.
Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion.
Public Works Director John Mazzitello said for the past
several months staff has been working on the property
located at 694 Wentworth Avenue, and gave the history of
this property.
Staff is asking for approval for assessing the costs of the
court fees, demolition and other costs associated with this
project to the property owner. The dollar figure expressed
in the resolution is the combination of the contractor costs,
legal costs and staff time. The amount to be assessed is
$22, 974.82.
Mayor Huber opened the public hearing. Seeing no one
else come forward wishing to speak, Mayor Huber asked
for a motion to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to close the public
hearing.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Councilmember Schneeman moved adoption of Resolution
No. 09 -64, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 694 WENTWORTH
AVENUE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION PROJECT
(PROJECT NUMBER 200907)."
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
August 4, 2009
Page 6
Councilmember Duggan expressed some language
concerns in the resolution. Mr. Mazzitello said he checked
the past assessment resolutions and it is a boilerplate legal
language for aN assessment resolution.
Councilmember Schneeman said it is wonderful to have
this over and done with.
Mr. Sedlacek reviewed Planning Case 09 -27, which is
a request for a critical area penult for 979 Caren Road.
The applicant has been in the process for a couple of years
of constructing a rock wall in the rear of his property
without a critical area permit. The applicant, upon deciding
to sell the property and move, hired a contractor to finish
the wall. The city was made aware of the move, and
required Mr. Fahey to apply for a critical area permit. By
the time the city was made aware of this situation, the work
was completed. There is a new owner of the property, Mr.
Bob Thompson, who was in the audience at this meeting.
Mr. Sedlacek said there is also a new rain garden in this
area that is seen as a natural stonework area that along with
the wall did not require a building permit. There were no
grading changes except for a small amount of dirt
movement.
The Planning Commission heard this case on July 28th and
the Planner recommended approval of the critical area
permit, feeling that the storm water facility was actually an
improvement to the water runoff of the site and the wall
was well within the standards of the critical area permit.
No one spoke at the public hearing and the Planning
Commission voted in favor of the critical area permit by a
7 -0 vote.
Mr. Bob Thompson, 979 Caren Road, said he purchased the
home partially because of the nice landscaping.
Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of Resolution No.
09 -65, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CRITICAL
August 4, 2009
Page 7
AREA PERMIT FOR LANDSCAPING AT 979 CAREN
ROAD."
Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion.
Mr. Sedlacek reviewed Planning Case No. 09 -28
which is a request for a variance for a side yard setback
located at 1250 Dodd Road.
The applicant currently has a two -car tandem garage, and is
proposing to construct a two -car garage along the frontage
of the home, with the third stall in tandem behind the
garage. The new garage will replace the current flat roof
structure, and will improve the roof line by tying the roof
line into the existing house.
The Planning Commission discussed this case at their July
28th meeting. Feeling that a two -car garage is a reasonable
request, they agreed with the applicant that there is no other
location to try to place this type of structure. It was also
discussed at the Planning Commission that there is a breeze
way between the garage and the home, with stairway access
to the basement of the home in this area, which would not
allow for the garage to be built closer to the home.
There was one person who spoke at the public hearing,
with a question regarding the cottonwood trees to the south
of the garage. Mr. Kaminueller addressed this issue with
the contractor's statement about the good health of the
trees.
The Planning Commission voted 6 -1 (Povolny being the
dissenting vote) to approve the Planner's recommendation.
Councilmember Schneeman said she recently met with the
Kammuellers, noting that they have done extensive
remodeling to their home. Councilmember Schneeman
said they assured her that the construction would be done in
a timely fashion, and she feels that the project will be a
great improvement to the home. In speaking to the next
door neighbor, Councilmember Schneeman said the
neighbor is very happy about this. The cottonwood trees
are very large and beautiful.
August 4, 2009
Page 8
Councilmember Schneeman moved adoption of "A
RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5' VARIANCE TO THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A GARAGE ADDITION
AT 1250 DODD ROAD."
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan asked if it is normal in the city for
homes to have two driveways, and is the gravel driveway in
this case considered a driveway. Mr. Sedlacek said this is
an existing non - conforming situation. Councilmember
Duggan said it would make sense to access the back garage
with a separate driveway rather than move cars in and out.
Councilmember Duggan said he is not happy with the
resolution language under condition #2, because this opens
opportunities to others in the community to convert their
garages in such a manner.
Councilmember Schneeman stated that Council usually
takes these situations on a case by case basis, and that this
was grandfathered in as the house was built during the
1940's.
Mayor Huber said he would have more of a concern if the
new garage exceeded the maximum allowed of 1,200 sq. ft.
Councilmember Duggan said he does not believe that this
does. Mayor Huber said this may open a can of worms.
City Attorney Tami Diehm said she was comfortable with
the language as it was, but understands Councilmember
Duggan's concerns. If the council would prefer to strike
the questionable language, they can do so. The important
thing to remember is that the garage size is within the
standards.
Councilmember Vitelli said the finding of a hardship has
not been found, and the property owner already has a two -
car garage.
Councilmember Krebsbach said she would support this as
the house was built in 1947, and had researched some
history of the home, finding that the original garage was
built in 1965. Councilmember Krebsbach said if this
garage would be any closer to the property line, she would
not be in favor of it. Councilmember Krebsbach said she
cautions the city council on "creative garages" and agrees
August 4, 2009
Page 9
with Councilmember Vitelli that this may start a confused
looking neighborhood. Councilmember Krebsbach said
she feels having one car in front of another is a hardship.
Councilmember Krebsbach said she believes this kind of
request will come again and would like to have the
resolution be sure to note that this will not exceed the
allowable size limit for a garage.
Councilmember Schneeman said she will rescind her
motion. Councilmember Krebsbach said she will rescind
her second.
Mr. Arnold Lucke, architect for the Kammuellers, is from
McGuire Courteau Lucke Architects, Inc. in St. Paul, MN.
Mr. Lucke talked about the Kammuellers asking him for
assistance in continuing their renovations for the garage.
Mr. Lucke said the plan is for a minimum of 21 -ft in width
for the garage, which will allow for a 16 -ft garage door and
would allow the Kammuellers to park two cars in the front,
accessing Dodd Road, and have another stall to the rear for
storage.
Councilmember Duggan asked if the existing garage has
always been used with one driveway to Dodd and one
driveway to Somerset. Mr. Lucke said that was correct, to
varying extents. Councilmember Duggan said generally,
garages are side by side, and knows of a few double -depth
garages that currently exist in the city.
Councilmember Duggan said there have been previous
discussions by the Planning Commission on when is a
garage a garage, and when is an accessory structure an
accessory structure. He asked Mr. Lucke if he had any
consideration for using the breezeway incorporating the
stairway areas in using that area as part of the garage. Mr.
Lucke explained how the breezeway was laid out and could
not be incorporated with the garage plans and would limit
the Kammuellers in accessing their property from front to
back, and vice versa, in that they would have to go through
the garage to do so. Councilmember Duggan asked if this
would create a fire hazard. Mr. Lucke said he could not
make statement to that.
August 4, 2009
Page 10
Councilmember Vitelli said he does not see why the
applicant could not incorporate the breeze way.
Councilmember Vitelli said the city has the ordinances in
place for a purpose, and cannot understand why the
architect cannot use the breeze way and eliminate the need
for the variance. Doors can be placed in the back of the
garage for easy access. Mr. Lucke said the access to the
basement is through this stairway, and the property owners
use this access to bring out the laundry. Mr. Lucke said as
professional architects, they respond to the owner's desires,
interests and program needs. If the stairway is left, and
eliminate the walkthrough, they would still need 2.5 -ft. into
the 10 -ft side yard setback. If there is another stairway
placed to access the lower level, they will have to find
another site into the basement. Councilmember Krebsbach
asked if there was an internal stairway. Mr. Lucke said
there is.
Mr. Ron Kammueller, 1250 Dodd Road, said the kitchen
door /back door will exit into the garage, and therefore, the
garage door will have to be opened to get out of the
kitchen. This is one of the reasons they want to maintain
the breeze way. Mr. Kammueller said he believes the
minimum lot size in the city today is 100 -ft. Mr.
Kammueller said his lot is only 90 -ft. and believes this
could be used as a hardship. In addition, the house was
built in 1947 and was centered on the lot. Mr. Kammueller
said the frontage that he needs is on the north side of the
lot, and if he could pick up the house and move it five feet,
he would not be here. Moving is not an option with the
money he has already invested, and they do not plan on
moving from this home as they like where they live. Mr.
Kammueller said he does not feel that this is an
unreasonable request.
Councilmember Krebsbach said a lot of people have to go
through their garage to get out of their kitchen.
Councilmember Krebsbach said this is a very uncommon
situation the breeze way and the stairways.
Councilmember Schneeman moved to approve "A
RESOLUTION APPROVING A 5' VARIANCE TO THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A GARAGE ADDITION
AT 1250 DODD ROAD ".
August 4, 2009
Page 11
Councilmember Schneeman said she is remaking this
motion because she feels that the applicant is doing a
wonderful job with the renovations and the breezeway will
be a nice addition to the home. Taking the breezeway out
and moving the garage closer to the home will make it all
darker as the home will lose some windows.
Mr. Kammueller said the elevation of the kitchen floor is
almost equal to Somerset Road in the back so that this
garage will have two elevations to the floor.
Mayor Huber seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan asked if the proposed addition will
include the demolition of the existing garage. Mr.
Kammueller said it will be totally demolished and rebuilt,
having a three car garage that is an allowable use in the
city.
Councilmember Duggan said he does not have a problem
with a three -car garage, but has a challenge with the
requirement of the variance in relation to the hardship.
Councilmember Schneeman said the hardship is the 90 -ft.
lot.
Councilmember Krebsbach said she is going to switch her
vote on this because she did not realize that the existing
garage would be torn down and does not believe building
the salve configuration is a good decision in 2009 as most
people would actually expect an attached garage, and to
keep an unusual configuration going would add much to
the resale.
Councilmember Schneeman said it would be an attached
garage as it is attached to the breezeway.
Councilmember Duggan asked if there was any
consideration for a detached garage back where the gravel
driveway area is. Mr. Kammueller said he has a back front
yard on Somerset Road and a front front yard on Dodd
Road, and if he were to build a free - standing 24 -ft garage,
with a 30 -ft setback on Somerset Road, it would destroy the
back yard. Additional fill would also have to be moved in
August 4, 2009
Page 12
for a grade change and trees would have to be removed.
This could also bring a hardship. Councilmember Duggan
said he appreciates that the applicant has thought this all
out, figuring out why it will not work rather than saying he
simply does not want it there.
Councilmember Schneeman said the next door neighbor
has also done a lot to their home.
Councilmember Duggan asked staff if there is a way to re-
look at the resolution to find there is something in there that
may have more substance in relation to the variance.
Ms. Diehm said ultimately this is a determination that the
council needs to make, and certainly a 90 -lot would be
something that could be put in the resolution as a finding to
show a hardship.
Councilmember Vitelli asked why this would be a hardship
as there are a lot of lots in the north end of the city that are
not 100 -ft. Councilmember Vitelli said he will simply not
support this as there is no hardship.
Councilmember Krebsbach said she is not going to support
this either as to take the structure down and rebuild in the
same footprint does not make any sense.
Mayor Huber said it is a little odd to take it down and
rebuild the same thing.
Councilmember Duggan asked for clarification on how the
driveway would be built. Mr. Sedlacek indicated on the
map how the driveway would be constructed and would be
in conformance.
Ayes: 2 (Mayor Huber, Councilmember Schneeman)
Nays: 3 (Councilmembers Duggan, Krebsbach, and Vitelli)
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SEMI FINALIST REVIEW/
2010 BUDGET WORKSHOP
Councilmember Schneeman suggested that the applicant re-
apply for this again with a different layout.
City Administrator Jim Danielson said there need to
be dates set for the 2010 Budget Workshop as well as the
review of applications for the replacement of the City
Administrator.
August 4, 2009
Page 13
Councilmember Duggan moved to approve the dates of
August 18th for the Semi Finalist Review and August 25th
for the 2010 Budget Workshop, both beginning at 5:00 pm.
Councilmember Schneeman seconded the motion.
Mayor Huber asked that any essays for the City
Administrator position be forwarded to the council soon as
possible to allow the council to review before the next
council meeting.
Councilmember Duggan said he would like to have staff
speed up the process for the group home discussion. Mr.
Danielson said this will be scheduled for public hearing at
the Planning Commission on August 25th and staff will
bring this back to the September 1st City Council meeting.
Councilmember Duggan attended two of the Nite to Unite
gatherings on Concord Way and on Cheyenne. A request
was made to have Mendota Heights staff work on traffic
slowing on Concord.
Councilmember Krebsbach said in reading the police
reports, residents are very fortunate to be living in a city
with the great police coverage.
Councilmember Krebsbach said that an olive oil business is
coming into the Village.
Councilmember Krebsbach said although she is not thrilled
with the signage going in at Mendota Plaza, people are glad
this is going to happen and things are moving forward.
Councilmember Schneeman asked if there is any
information available on the Foss property. Mr. Mazzitello
said they have received some preliminary inquiries for
utility as- builts along Wentworth and Wachtler from a local
engineer representing a purchaser of the Foss property,
beyond that they have not seen any proposals.
Councilmember Schneeman asked if this went to probate
court. Mr. Mazzitello said to staffs knowledge, there is a
purchaser.
ADJOURN
August 4, 2009
Page 14
Councilmember Schneeman sent condolences to the Jim
Lilly family for the recent passing of Mr. Lilly.
Councilmember Duggan said there will be fundraiser at
TK's the weekend of August 25th for the police canine unit
of West St. Paul.
There being no further business to come before the
Council, Councilmember Duggan moved to adjourn the
meeting
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Time of Adjournment 8:14 p.m.
Rebecca Shaffer
Recording Secretary