12 16 2025 City Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
December 16, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3.Pledge of Allegiance
4.Approval of the Agenda
The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the
agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline.
5.Public Comments - for items not on the agenda
Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not
on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their
comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested
to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to
three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask
clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up.
6.Consent Agenda
Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a
councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item,
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items
removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business.
a.Approve Minutes from the December 2, 2025, City Council Meeting
b.Approve Minutes from the December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting
c.Approve 2026 Schedule of City Council Meeting Dates
d.Adopt Resolution 2025-90 Formally Accepting a Donation from the Coss Family
Foundation
e.Approve the Appointment of Mayor Stephanie Levine to the St. Paul Regional Water
Services (SPRWS) Board of Water Commissioners
f.Approve 2026 Fourth of July Fireworks
g.Authorize a Second Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota Countyto Operate Residential Food Scraps Drop Site
Page 1 of 397
h.Approve the 2026 Community Waste Abatement Agreement with Dakota County
i.Approve the Purchase of a Standby Generator for the Par 3 Maintenance Building
j.Authorize the Purchase of a Replacement Fire Department Chief 1 Vehicle
k.Approve Fire Holiday Pay Policy
l.Adopt Resolution 2025-88 Adopting the 2026 Pay Classification Plan for Non-Union
Employees
m.Approve 2026-2027 Public Works Union Contract with Teamsters Local 320
n.Adopt Ordinance 605 - Amending City Code 10-5-6: Water Surcharge
o.Approve a Grant Agreement for the Geothermal Planning Project
p.Adopt Resolution 2025-87 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the Basin IV-
P126 Improvement Project
q.Adopt Resolution 2025-84 to Defer Street Rehabilitation Assessment at 723
Cheyenne Lane
r.Adopt Resolution 2025-91 Accepting Work and Final Payment for Emerson Avenue
Street Improvements Project 202306
s.Approve Claims List
7.Presentations
8.Public Hearings
a.2026 Fee Schedule
b.Resolution 2025-89 Public Hearing on Municipal Consent for the Sibley Memorial
Highway Improvement and Turnback
c.Resolution 2025-86 Ordering of Improvements for the Hampshire Estates Street
Project
9.New and Unfinished Business
a.Authorize the Purchase of OpenGov's Asset Management Software
b.Municipal Campus Building Project - Resolution 2025-93 Ordering the Improvement
and Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Construction of a
new Police Department and City Hall Building
c.Adopt Resolution 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission Representatives
10.Community / City Administrator Announcements
11.City Council Comments
12.Adjourn
Page 2 of 397
Next Meeting: January 6, 2026 at 6:00PM
Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals
with disabilities upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by
emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on NDC4/Town Square Television Cable
Channel 18/HD798 and online at townsquare.tv/Mendota-Heights-Streaming
Page 3 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Paper, and Maczko were
also present. Councilor Mazzitello was absent.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Lorberbaum moved adoption of the agenda.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No one from the public wished to be heard.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval.
Councilor Paper moved approval of the consent agenda as presented, pulling items F and G.
a.Approval of November 18, 2025, City Council Minutes
b.Approval of November 18, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes
c.Acknowledge Minutes from the October 28, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting
d.Acknowledge the July, August, September, and October 2025 Fire Synopses
e.Approve Resolution 2025-85 Authorizing the Release of City Local Affordable Housing Aid
(LAHA) Funds to Dakota County Community Development Agency
f.Approve Resolution 2025-71 Approving a Request by Mendota Lot 7, LLC and Spaulding-Cashill,
LLP for a One-Year Extension for Phase III Apartment Improvements (The Retreat at Mendota
Village)
g.Approve Job Description for Recycling and Sustainability Coordinator and Authorize Hire
h.Accept the Resignation of Andrew Phomphakdy and Authorizing Posting for Public Works
Maintenance Worker
Page 4 of 397
6.a
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 7
i.Approve a New Liquor License Application
j.Approve a New Massage Therapist License Pending a Successful Background Check
k.Approve the Purchase of Anti-Icing Equipment Upgrades
l.Approve a Right-of-Way License Agreement for 816 Westview Circle
m.Approve October 2025 Treasurer’s Report
n.Approval of Claims List
Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine moved to consider the pulled Consent Agenda items as New and Unfinished Business Items
B and C.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson suggested that those items become Items C and D.
Mayor Levine moved to consider Consent Agenda Items F and G as New and Unfinished Business Items
C and D.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PRESENTATIONS
No items scheduled.
PUBLIC HEARING
No items scheduled.
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) 2026 CITY BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAX LEVY
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker presented the 2026 budget and explained that the Council was being
asked to hold a public meeting and adopt the Resolution approving the final tax levy and budget.
Mayor Levine thanked the Finance Director and her staff for the budget, noting the long process that got
them to this point.
Councilor Maczko asked if there was an addition of one FTE for the Recycling and Sustainability
Coordinator.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker replied that the position was formerly an employee of West St. Paul,
but that the employee will now be an employee of Mendota Heights. She stated that what is reflected in
the budget includes wages and expenditures for recycling, along with a greater revenue amount to offset
those. She stated that the cost for the employee is funded through the levy and that the difference to the
levy is $6,849.
Page 5 of 397
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 7
Councilor Maczko stated that there will still be an employee increase to the City. He stated that previously,
the recycling grant funds were administered by West St. Paul to support the position. He expressed
concern about the addition of a staff position and about approving the budget before approving the
position.
Mayor Levine stated that the agenda order was revised to support the request for a resident in attendance.
Councilor Maczko suggested that the position be discussed as part of the budget.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt provided input on the method to move forward and consider Item D before
taking action on this item.
Councilor Maczko moved to TABLE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to AMEND THE AGENDA TO MOVE ITEM 9D UP FOR
CONSIDERATION AT THIS TIME.
Councilor Maczko seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
D) APPROVE JOB DESCRIPTION FOR RECYCLING AND SUSTAINABILITY
COORDINATOR AND AUTHORIZE HIRE
Councilor Maczko stated that he wanted to have this discussion for public transparency, as this is a request
to take on an FTE. He asked staff for background information on the request and the financial
responsibility of the City.
Parks and Recreation and Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence stated that the City needs
to meet the solid waste abatement program requirement of Dakota County. She explained that the City
needs to employ someone to do that or contract with someone to meet the requirement. She stated that,
going back to the 1990s, the City has received funding from Dakota County for this purpose. She provided
additional information on the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) the City has been a part of, the contributions
towards the staff position made by each city, and the grant funds. She stated that West St. Paul will
continue to be a partner in the JPA. She stated that the overall impact on the Mendota Heights levy will
be $6,849. She provided additional details on the grant funds that are received for the program and the
sustainability efforts the position will manage.
Mayor Levine explained how the JPA allows cities to work together efficiently in order to meet mandates
the city is required to meet.
Parks and Recreation and Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence stated that for 2026 the
city is seeking 20 hours a week in recycling and sustainability services and provided clarification on the
cost to the City in salary and benefits, as well as the grant funds and contributions from other cities.
Page 6 of 397
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 7
Mayor Levine clarified that the employee will be a full-time employee, but not a full-time employee for
the city of Mendota Heights.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson added that the employee will office out of City Hall.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker provided clarification on the 2025 budgeted cost and revenue
compared to the proposed 2026 budgeted cost and revenue for recycling.
Parks and Recreation and Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence commented that this is a
good value for the additional sustainability efforts the City will gain in return for the expense.
Mayor Levine agreed that this seems to be a good deal for the City in return for what it will receive.
Councilor Maczko agreed that cities working together through JPAs often result in higher value to the
cities.
Councilor Paper moved to approve JOB DESCRIPTION FOR RECYCLING AND SUSTAINABILITY
COORDINATOR AND AUTHORIZE HIRE.
Councilor Maczko seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
A) 2026 CITY BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAX LEVY (CONTINUED)
Councilor Maczko moved to remove the 2026 City Budget and Property Tax Levy from the table for
discussion and consideration.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to open the public hearing.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Bruce Bobbitt, 2455 Hampshire Court, thanked the Council and staff for their efforts to be fiscally
responsible and present a reasonable budget. He asked for and received clarification on the expenditure
breakdown per department and asked how that compares to other similarly sized cities. He asked the total
number of full-time employees (FTE) the City has between Police and non-Police.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker clarified the expenditure breakdown per department. She stated that
she has not provided a comparison of other communities, but could look into that.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson replied that in 2026, the total FTE count will be 54.9, and of that,
23.5 are Police.
Mr. Bobbitt commented that he loves the organics program. He stated that he will be interested in the
logistics of the organics collection when those details are developed.
Page 7 of 397
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 7
Parks and Recreation and Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence replied that there are a lot
of details being developed for the program. She stated that there will be a requirement that all haulers
provide the service, and customers will have the choice of whether they would like to use the service. She
noted that all customers would be charged for the collection, whether or not they participate.
Councilor Lorberbaum recognized that not all haulers are ready to provide that service.
Parks and Recreation and Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence commented that the new
position will work with haulers to determine their needs and capabilities as well.
Councilor Paper moved to close the public hearing.
Councilor Maczko seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Councilor Paper moved to approve RESOLUTION 2025-81 APPROVING FINAL 2025 LEVY
COLLECTIBLE IN 2026 AND ADOPTING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 2026.
Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
B) RESOLUTION 2025-83 APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF HAMPTON COMPANIES LLC
FOR A CUP FOR AN ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY AT THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1178 NORTHLAND DRIVE (PLANNING CASE NO. 2025-21)
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a brief background on this item. The Council
was being asked to consider a Conditional Use Permit for an assisted living and memory care facility at
1178 Northland Drive.
Councilor Maczko moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2025-83 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR AN ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY AT 1178 NORTHLAND
DRIVE.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Further discussion: Mayor Levine welcomed the business to the community, noting that it provides
another housing choice option to aging residents.
Councilor Paper recognized that this application is to build a new facility on a vacant piece of land and
will also create 25 jobs in the community, while providing a service to residents. He noted that the operator
has 19 other locations with more under construction, and therefore seems to be a good operator.
Councilor Maczko asked why the City did not request a sidewalk along Northland Drive.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that at this time, there was no existing
infrastructure for a sidewalk to connect to.
Page 8 of 397
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 of 7
Todd Francis, Hampton Construction, provided information on the company and the other locations they
have under construction.
Councilor Lorberbaum noted there were two accessibility parking spots, which are all that is required by
law, and asked why there are not more than the two required spots.
Mr. Francis explained that residents are dropped off and picked up in front of the building closest to the
door, and that area is flat. He stated that handicap stalls are provided for visitors who may need those
spots. He stated that they do not have a surplus of visitors.
Councilor Lorberbaum noticed that the facility will have a total of 20 employees, but sometimes only
three employees will be on duty.
Mr. Francis stated that he is more on the building side than the operations side. He stated that they meet
all licensing guidelines. He stated that there are more than three employees at one time, as there are
different departments such as nursing and caregiving.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
C) APPROVE RESOLUTION 2025-71 APPROVING A REQUEST BY MENDOTA LOT 7,
LLC AND SPAULDING-CASHILL, LLP FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR PHASE III
APARTMENT IMPROVEMENTS (THE RETREAT AT MENDOTA VILLAGE)
Councilor Maczko asked about the purpose of the City Council in accepting this, as the project is under
construction. He stated that the letter was submitted in September and the Council is being asked to
approve the extension now. He asked why there was such a delay in forwarding this and why this action
is needed by the Council.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt stated that in the agreement, the Council has the final authority to approve
the extension.
Councilor Maczko stated that it would have been nice to have the request earlier, before construction had
begun. He felt that their hands were tied and was disappointed that this was not presented earlier.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt stated that the agreement does not provide set criteria for an extension to be
granted, other than the developer requesting the extension at least 90 days before the completion date,
which was met by the letter that was submitted on September 30th. She stated that all terms of the
agreement have been met and therefore did not believe it would make a difference if this were presented
earlier.
Mayor Levine asked if this type of extension is standard.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt replied that there is always room provided within the Development
Agreement to accomplish deadlines with some flexibility. She stated that the project has been proceeding
over many years, noting that this is the ninth amendment to the agreement. She confirmed that it is
standard to allow give and take in the schedule to allow a project to continue, recognizing that unforeseen
circumstances arise in a project.
Page 9 of 397
December 2, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 7
Councilor Paper moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-71 APPROVING A REQUEST BY
MENDOTA LOT 7, LLC AND SPAULDING-CASHILL, LLP FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR
PHASE III APARTMENT IMPROVEMENTS (THE RETREAT AT MENDOTA VILLAGE).
Mayor Levine seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 1 (Maczko)
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming community events and activities.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilor Lorberbaum stated that earlier tonight, the Council held a workshop on the proposed municipal
building project. She expressed the commitment of the Council and staff to engage and inform residents
throughout this process. She stated that there was also a recent workshop on the topic of e-bikes, which
will continue through future discussions, noting that potential regulations will be communicated to
residents.
Councilor Maczko recognized that the City Hall project has garnered a lot of questions with input on both
sides. He stated that on December 16th, there will be a presentation and the Council will make a decision
on moving forward, which will also involve a process of public engagement. He encouraged residents to
participate in the process.
Councilor Paper thanked the resident who provided input at the meeting tonight.
Mayor Levine recognized the accomplishment in adopting the 2026 budget and the time and effort that
went into the development of that budget. She thanked the Council and staff for their efforts throughout
that process.
ADJOURN
Councilor Paper moved to adjourn.
Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 7:18 p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Nancy Bauer
City Clerk
Page 10 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session
Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was
held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Maczko,
and Paper were in attendance. Councilor Mazzitello was absent.
Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly
Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Parks &
Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, Community
Development Manager Sarah Madden, Police Chief Kelly McCarthy, Police Sergeant Wayne
Wegener, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer.
Also in attendance from ICS were President Andy Faulkner, Business Development Specialist
Kristin Duerr, and Project Development Specialist Karen Klein.
CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING PROJECT
Attendees introduced themselves. City Administrator Jacobson explained that the work session
aimed to review past progress and discuss the current status, noting that the Council should
determine whether they would be ready for a presentation at the December 16 City Council
meeting.
City Administrator Jacobson provided a timeline for previous meetings.
March 4, 2025, the Council unanimously identified addressing the Police Department and City
Hall needs as a top priority at a strategic work session.
March 18, 2025, Council approved a professional services contract with ICS.
August 6, 2025, ICS presented their preliminary findings of the Facility Condition Assessment
and Space Utilization Study. The space needs findings indicated that:
1.The current facility is undersized for current needs
2.The cost of renovating the facility to meet current needs exceeds industry standards when
compared with the cost to build new
3.The current facility has safety and security concerns for the public and staff
4.The current facility is negatively impacting service levels to the community as well as
staff efficiencies
Page 11 of 397
6.b
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2
August 6, 2025, Council directed staff to analyze the feasibility of all available options to
address the facility’s concerns.
September 3, 2025, Council directed staff to develop fiscally responsible options for Council
consideration.
October 7, 2025, Council directed staff to engage the public on the facility needs.
October 28, 2025, staff hosted a Municipal Campus Project Open House.
Options that have been discussed:
Contracting Out Police Services:
Pros discussed included reduced costs and less space would be needed. Cons included reduced
service levels, loss of local control, slower response times, and diminished community
connection. Council direction: Maintain the Police Department and ensure it has the necessary
infrastructure and operational support to provide services.
Facility Relocation:
Sites evaluated included the fire station, public works site, Bourne property, and vacant office
buildings in the city. None of the options were deemed feasible for relocation. Council direction:
The municipal campus should be centrally located to ensure effective emergency response, and
the City Hall and the police station should be co-located to maintain public safety and efficient
municipal operations.
Renovation:
Renovation costs to meet current needs exceed industry standards, and maintaining operations
during renovation would negatively impact services and increase costs. Council direction: The
municipal campus project must be a long-term investment that provides lasting value to
residents.
New Construction:
Preliminary estimates indicate an approximate $33 per month tax increase for the average
homeowner. A bonding request was submitted to the State Legislature which may help offset
costs. Phased construction could reduce initial expenses but may incur additional costs for future
construction and potential duplication of work. Council direction: Develop proposals for a long-
term scope using a “dig once” approach, building to meet both current and future needs.
November 5, 2025, Council directed staff to develop proposals for a “dig once” approach to
refine scope.
City Administrator Jacobson noted that NDC4 had produced a video summarizing project
options and addressing frequently asked questions. The video was shown, and she expressed
appreciation to NDC4 for their assistance in creating it.
Page 12 of 397
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3
City Administrator Jacobson stated that Council direction is to propose a municipal campus
project scope that: (1) is fiscally responsible with a clear and transparent scope and cost
structure; (2) provides long-term value to residents; (3) supports efficient and effective public
safety and municipal services; and (4) includes a co-located City Hall and Police Department to
maximize efficiency, safety, and security.
Business Development Specialist Kristin Duerr presented a timeline of future tasks that would
follow if the City Council approved the project at the December 16 meeting. She outlined two
options:
1. Build for Immediate Need:
The estimated cost increased from $26 million to $29 million due to required soil corrections and
if needed, enhanced footing systems. The proposed square footage is 15,845 sq. ft. for City Hall
and 27,222 sq. ft. for the Police Department.
2. “Dig Once” and Build for Future Needs:
The estimated cost decreased from $33 million to $31 million after reducing the garage space
and removing the CJN space. However, if state bonding is awarded, the project would need to
meet B3 energy standards and include the required CJN space, increasing the total cost to $35
million.
Councilor Paper asked about the site plan for a new building. Business Development Specialist
Duerr noted that it was a preliminary sketch to be used as a visual. Councilor Paper asked when
it would be known if the bonding bill was successful. City Administrator Jacobson stated it
would be about May 2026.
Mayor Levine stated that a successful bonding bill could help supplement the cost of
constructing a new building, though it could also increase costs. She asked what the taxpayer
impact would be if a CJN space were included in the new facility.
Councilor Maczko asked for more information about CJN. Chief McCarthy explained that it
stands for Criminal Justice Network, a nonprofit consortium that supports efficient police
operations through records management and information sharing. She noted that Mendota
Heights has participated in CJN for years and that 26 Minnesota agencies currently use it, with
efforts underway to expand participation. She added that if CJN were to have space in the new
facility, they would pay rent.
Councilor Maczko asked for information about the sites that were not considered feasible.
Business Development Specialist Duerr replied they were discussed at the November 5 work
session.
Page 13 of 397
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 4
ICS President Andy Faulkner noted that to add a CJN space it would cost approximately $1
million. Mayor Levine asked how much rent would be charged. Chief McCarthy stated that it
was not known at the time.
Councilor Maczko noted that he was not sure if the community is aware of the Council’s current
position in the process and emphasized the importance of ensuring there is public support for the
project.
Mayor Levine summarized the outreach efforts taken so far to inform the community. She noted
that an open house was held for community engagement and asked what information had been
shared with the public and how far it had reached. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson
reported that, as of November 5, the municipal campus project webpage had received 593 visits.
Additionally, 84 people viewed the open house news flash, and 46 clicked on the calendar
invitation. Social media metrics were not available. She added that the video shown at the
meeting would also be made accessible to the public.
Councilor Maczko stated that the community recognizes the need to address the building, and
that the next step is determining exactly what should be done. He noted that the City is not
anticipated to experience further growth, so he questioned why the building is being considered
for future needs. The City saw a lot of growth in the 80’s and then again in the 90’s.
Mayor Levine asked for an explanation of what future growth for the building means. Business
Development Specialist Duerr explained that building for the future incorporates some flexibility
in the design to allow for operational changes that come as new practices are integrated into
operations. The goal is to identify spaces that allow staff to do their jobs efficiently, noting that
the building is currently undersized. She added that there are security issues with the existing
facility, and those concerns have been exposed to the public, so the decision is more time
sensitive than it has been.
Councilor Maczko noted that right now the existing space consists of 11,500 sq. ft. for City Hall
and 8,500 sq. ft. for the police. To build for immediate needs the recommendation is to add
4,500 sq. ft. for City Hall and 18,000 sq. ft. for the police (which includes garage space), and to
build for the future an additional 2,400 sq. ft. for City Hall and 10,000 sq. ft. for the police. Why
is the additional space needed if current staffing is adequate. Business Development Specialist
Duerr responded that it was addressed in the second work session that was held which discussed
the needs vs the wants. The wants were removed, the needs were identified, and ICS worked
based on Council direction. City Administrator Jacobson also noted that additional positions—
such as a code enforcement officer or a sustainability position—may be needed in the future.
Page 14 of 397
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 5
Mayor Levine commented on recently built facilities in Rosemount and Eagan. The difference
between the two is that one was built for immediate needs and has issues now, and the other has
flexibility to adapt as operations change. The Council should learn from the lessons of our
neighbors.
An audience member commented that the project skipped over the public consultation process.
He learned about the project through his son. His neighbors have no knowledge of the project.
The money is significant. Chief McCarthy stated that the specifics are not known yet to present
to the public. The challenge of public engagement this early in the process is that we do not have
more specifics to provide as the council is so early on in the process that direction has not been
provided yet.
An audience member stated that he had the impression that the contracts were going to be signed
soon.
Another audience member stated that she was distressed by the tone of the discussion
surrounding the project. She said the Council is approaching the project exactly as it should. She
noted that she served on the Council when the fire station was built and remains proud of the
planning that went into that facility. She emphasized that additional space is needed for the
municipal campus and that investing further in the existing building would not be prudent, noting
that extensive maintenance has already been done to sustain what she described as a “sick
building.” She added that the current facility was not built to municipal standards. She expressed
strong support for the municipal campus project and said she would publicly share that support.
She also commented that the bonding bill may not pass but suggested that the City could seek
exemption from sales tax on the project, as was done for the Fire Station. Finally, she noted that
the ballfield should be relocated and that there are options available for relocating the ballfield.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked why co-locating City Hall with the Police Department is
considered a safety issue. Chief McCarthy responded that the two primary reasons are
managerial control and overall safety. Mayor Levine referenced the New Hope incident, noting
that co-location can also help ensure that people visiting City Hall feel safe. City Administrator
Jacobson added that a municipal campus would also create operational efficiencies, such as
shared conference space. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson noted an additional benefit:
improved staff integration by having employees work together in one building.
Business Development Specialist Duerr suggested touring other city halls. Councilor
Lorberbaum said she would be interested in touring other city halls.
Councilor Paper noted that when considering future needs, it is important to remember that 15
years ago the City did not have natural resources staff, a volunteer coordinator, or recycling staff.
Page 15 of 397
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 6
He added that some departments hire interns, and having adequate space to support them would
provide additional benefits to the community.
Councilor Paper also stated that, while he is appalled by the project’s cost, he supports
addressing the City’s needs. He noted that costs are largely uncontrollable and that discussions
about this project have been ongoing since he joined the Council in 2017. He emphasized the
importance of moving forward, as costs will only rise the longer the project is delayed. He
explained that the project is largely driven by the Police Department and that not all requests are
being funded. Relying on state or federal funding is not feasible. Councilor Paper indicated
support for the “future-ready” option and expressed interest in including CJN in the building if it
can generate revenue. He added that the ballfield should be relocated if it cannot fit on the site,
given its special status, and he would like the old City Hall to be demolished.
Councilor Lorberbaum agreed with Councilor Paper.
City Administrator Jacobson stated that Councilor Mazzitello was in favor of building a new
facility.
Councilor Maczko stated that people move to Mendota Heights because it is a value-driven
community, where the services provided are exceptional for the taxes paid. He emphasized that
public funds should be spent on what is truly needed. Any new construction should be
appropriately sized and done correctly, and the details can be worked out. He indicated he could
support new construction if it is the right decision and would support including CJN in the
building, if they pay rent.
Mayor Levine stated that she agrees with the rest of the Council. Regarding CJN, she noted that
its inclusion would depend on how much bonding could be secured and the associated costs to
the City. She emphasized that other funding options for the project need to be thoroughly
discussed. Potential sources include funds in the City’s fund balance, proceeds from selling city-
owned property, and revenue could be generated from charitable gambling or franchise fees.
City Administrator Jacobson stated that the estimated projected costs are available for the “dig
once” option.
Mayor Levine stated there needs to be a proactive approach to engaging with the public. The
residents will want to know what is going to happen and how much it is going to cost.
Councilor Lorberbaum noted that a right sized building for the future was estimated to be $33 a
month for a median valued home value, they may want to know the yearly cost, and the other
costs on their tax bill.
Page 16 of 397
December 2, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 7
Councilor Maczko stated that he agrees that a new facility is needed but he wants more
information about what the difference between the immediate needs option and the
“dig once” option noting that he wants to be fiscally responsible. Mayor Levine stated that all
council members are fiscally responsible.
Mayor Levine asked what decision would be made at the December 16 Council meeting and
whether the cost would be included in the presentation. Business Development Specialist Duerr
responded that, based on the discussion and direction from tonight’s meeting, ICS would present
the “dig once” option, including CJN, along with an estimated budget.
ICS President Faulkner stated that the preliminary project schedule includes multiple design
phases. If a decision is made on December 16 to pursue the “dig once” future-ready option, with
CJN, an estimated budget will be provided, and the design can then be developed within the set
budget. Chief McCarthy added that this would be the stage when the community could provide
input into the design process.
Councilor Maczko stated he would like to see in the December 16 presentation the process for
community involvement.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilor Lorberbaum made a motion to adjourn the work session, and the motion was seconded
by Councilor Paper. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
_________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 17 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
6.c
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve 2026 Schedule of City Council Meeting Dates
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the 2026 Schedule of City Council Meeting Dates.
BACKGROUND:
City Code provides that meetings of the City Council should be held on the first and third
Tuesday of each month. If conflicts such as a holiday occur on a regular meeting day, the
Council may reschedule the meeting to a different day. All regular meetings will have a start
time of 6:00 pm and be conducted at City Hall. All work session meetings will have a 4:30 pm
start time and be conducted at City Hall unless otherwise noted. The proposed 2026 City
Council meeting calendar is as follows:
January 6, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
January 20, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
January 20, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
February 4, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting (Wednesday moved for precinct caucus)
February 17, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
February 17, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
March 3, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
March 17, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
March 17, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
April 7, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
April 21, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
April 21, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
May 5, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
May 19, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
May 19, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
Page 18 of 397
June 2, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
June 16, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
June 16, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
July 7, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
July 21, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
July 21, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
August 5, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting (Wednesday moved for Night to Unite)
August 18, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
August 18, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
September 1, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
September 15, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
September 15, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
October 6, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
October 20, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
October 20, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
November 4, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting (Wednesday moved for General Election)
November 17, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
November 17, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
December 1, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
December 15, 2026, at 4:30 pm: City Council Work Session
December 15, 2026, at 6:00 pm: City Council Meeting
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 19 of 397
6.d
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-90 Formally Accepting a Donation from the Coss
Family Foundation
ITEM TYPE: Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-90 Accepting a Donation from the Coss Family Foundation
BACKGROUND:
State law requires that the city accept all donations by means of a resolution.
The City has received a $15,000 donation from the Coss Family Foundation. This donation is
to be used for general support of the Fire Department. This is the seventh donation that the
City has received from the Coss Family Foundation. The City is grateful for the Foundation's
generosity.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The donation will be deposited in the city's General Fund and used in support of the fire
department.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Res. 2025-90 Accepting a Coss Family Foundation Donation 2025
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 20 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-90
FORMALLY ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM THE COSS FAMILY FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights desires to follow Minnesota Statutes §465.03,
“Gifts to Municipalities”; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §465.03 requires all gifts and donations of real or personal
property be accepted with the adoption of a resolution approved by two-thirds of the members of the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Coss Family Foundation has provided the City with a donation of $15,000 in
support of the fire department; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered this matter and wishes to acknowledge the
civic-mindedness and generosity of citizens and officially recognize their donations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights hereby accepts a donation of $15,000 from the Coss Family Foundation in support of the
Mendota Heights Fire Department.
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 16th day of December 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
______________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 21 of 397
6.e
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Appointment of Mayor Stephanie Levine to the St. Paul
Regional Water Services (SPRWS) Board of Water Commissioners
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Appoint Mayor Stephanie Levine to the St. Paul Regional Water Services Board of Water
Commissioners.
BACKGROUND:
In 2015, the City Council approved a new water service agreement with St. Paul Regional
Water Services (SPRWS) in which the City deeded ownership of the water distribution system
to SPRWS. As part of that agreement, Mendota Heights, joining other municipal partners,
would be able to enter into a separate agreement to hold one of two seats on the Board of
Water Commissioners.
In December 2023, the City Council approved an updated Agreement for Suburban
Representation, where Mendota Heights was officially added as a stakeholder and into the
suburban representative rotation on the Board of Water Commissioners. Historically, the City
of Maplewood has held a permanent seat (seat A). The second suburban representative seat
(seat B) is held by a representative of the partner communities of Falcon Heights, West St.
Paul, Lauderdale, and Mendota Heights. The representation for Seat B is rotated among the
suburban representatives, with Mendota Heights' term running from January 1, 2026 to
December 31, 2027.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Agreement Regarding Suburban Board Representation on Board of Water Commissioners
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 22 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
AGREEMENT REGARDING SUBURBAN REPRESENTATION ON
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
This agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of this 27th day of
December 2023, by and among the Cities of Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Maplewood,
Mendota Heights, and West St. Paul, each a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota
collectively, the "Suburban Cities" or the "Parties").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Board of Water Commissioners (the "Board"), is a municipal corporation
organized under the 1885 Laws of the State of Minnesota, Chapter 110, which laws originally
provided for a five -member governing commission; and
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Charter Commission and Saint Paul City Council by
Resolution No. 96-1365 authorized that the composition and governance of the Board be enlarged
and changed so as to allow for representation by suburban municipalities that have contracted with
the Board for the provision of water services; and
WHEREAS, prior to January 1, 1998 the Board consisted of five total members: three
Saint Paul City Council members appointed to two-year terms by the Mayor of Saint Paul, and
two at -large Saint Paul citizen members appointed to four-year terms by the Mayor of Saint Paul;
and
WHEREAS, in a contract between the Board and the City of Maplewood for the provision
of water services entered into as of October 30, 1996 (the "Maplewood Agreement"), Maplewood
and the Board agreed to enlarge Board membership to six total members with the additional
member representing Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, in the Maplewood Agreement, the Board also agreed to enlarge the Board
membership to seven total members in the event that other suburban cities enter into similar
agreements with the Board; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Mendota Heights, and West St.
Paul have executed agreements with the Board similar to the Maplewood Agreement, and therefore
MA745-1-882698.v2
Page 23 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
Board membership has been expanded to a total of seven members- to increase the suburban
representation on the Board; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Cities are currently Parties to an agreement for representation
on the Board which expires on December 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Cities now wish to enter into a new 8-year agreement with new
terms for shared representation on the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Suburban Cities agree as follows:
SECTION I.
GENERAL PURPOSE
It is the general purpose of this Agreement to jointly and cooperatively develop a plan for
representation by the Suburban Cities on the Board beginning January 1, 2024.
SECTION II.
SELECTION OF SUBURBAN REPRESENTATIVE TO
THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
The Parties agree that the two suburban representatives shall be selected on the following
basis and according to the following terms:
1. The two suburban seats shall be designated as Seat A and Seat B.
2. Maplewood shall appoint a representative to the Board for Seat A. During the
term of this Agreement, Maplewood's appointee shall serve for such period or
may be replaced with another representative as desired by the Maplewood City
Council.
MA745-1-882698.v2
Page 24 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
3. The second suburban representative shall be designated as Seat B, and shall
consist of two-year terms commencing January 1, 2024 and shall be rotated
among the suburban representatives in the following order:
a. January 1, 2024- December 31, 2025 — Falcon Heights
b. January 1, 2026- December 31, 2027 — Mendota Heights
c. January 1, 2028- December 31, 2029 — West St. Paul
d. January 1, 2030- December 31, 2031 - Lauderdale
4. The Parties agree that in the event an additional suburban community enters into
a Water Service Agreement similar to those agreements executed by and between
the Board and the Suburban Cities, this Agreement may be amended to include
any such additional communities, which communities shall be subject to the same
terms and conditions as the original communities. Maplewood hereby
acknowledges that should additional cities join, Seat A may not remain an
exclusive seat for Maplewood.
5. Vacancies — The Parties agree that a vacancy on the Board of Seat B shall be
filled by the City currently holding the appointment and shall be for the period
remaining in the term.
6. Amendment — The Parties agree that this Agreement may be amended only as
may be mutually agreed to in writing by all of the Suburban Cities currently
represented on the Board at the time of amendment.
7. Duration — The Parties agree that the term of this agreement shall continue until
December 31, 2031, unless otherwise amended as provided herein.
the remainder of this page left intentionally blank]
MA745-1-882698.v2
Page 25 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed in their behalf respectively as of the day and year first above written.
By:
Date:
By:
Approved as to form:
DocuSigned by:
9A922 A44884 D...
City Attorney
12/11/2023 1 2:58 PM CST
Approved as to form:
DocuSigned by:
Pw baffui
B3-1- 5L31 BA6B4EC...
City Attorney
Date:
12/6/2023 I 11:30 AM CST
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
DocuSigned by:
By: Frowu1 uSfa Sbt,
ll G1-CA1-41-71309460...
Randy Gustafson
Mayor, City of Falcon Heights
Date:
12/7/2023 I 8 : 27 PM CST
DocuSigned by:
Per•Cit,
ByGED138AE-1#3F4- 0...
Jack Linehan
City Administrator, City of Falcon Heights
12/6/2023 1 12:55 PM CST
Date:
By:
Date:
By:
Date:
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
DocuSigned by:
ilitani at/AUL'
12OFFr'CEE91947A
Mary Gaasch
Mayor, City of Lauderdale
12/27/2023 1 9:27 AM CST
DocuSigned by:
A t,ag,t r juft'W Sfi
E^95^80...
Heather Butkowski
City Administrator, City of Lauderdale
12/6/2023 1 3:36 PM CST
MA745-1-882698.v2
Page 26 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
Approved as to form:
By:
DocuSigned by:
w 61 B
489-FS1II1 DAPS4EC...
City Attorney
12/6/2023 1 11:30 AM CST
Date:
By:
Approved as to form:
DocuSigned by:
Pew ki644on,
9D645&...
City Attorney
Date: 12/6/2023 I 1:52 PM CST
Date:
By:
Date:
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
DocuSigned by:
HF4 Lu At4e.41,4
p,€PA ar4F 1-D841 S
Marylee Abrams
Mayor, City of Maplewood
12/6/2023 1 11:19 AM CST
rDocuSigned
by:
l
l tatt- CbttAttiA, Ei\
DD766.8-346e+FC.. Melinda
Coleman City
Manager, City of Maplewood 12/
6/2023 1 8:58 AM PST CITY
OF WEST ST. PAUL By:
tDocuSigned
by: D4C-
FG9BB907494... Dave
Napier Mayor,
City of West St. Paul Date:
B
Date:
12/
14/2023 1 2:40 AM CST DocuSigned
by: E7D6293E&
1€g... Nate
Burkett City
Manager, City of West St. Paul 12/
6/2023 1 10:59 AM CST MA745-
1-882698.v2
Page 27 of 397
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1DA9B124-2878-461C-83ED-E070B8A8B35C
Approved as to form:
By: ['
DocuSigned by:
moil- -4A-t-SLIti
By: 324E300071-1-42E...
City Attorney Stephanie Levine
Mayor, City of Mendota Heights
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DocuSigned by:
gc 761/1. t, (AAA-it/U.
53F7F33A41B34EE_
12/9/2023 1 8:27 AM PST 12/11/2023 1 2:48 PM CST
Date: Date:
By:
Date:
DocuSigned by:
ru, r1t jaLbIgS6vi,
Cheryl Jacobson
City Administrator, City of Mendota Heights
12/11/2023 1 8:24 AM CST
MA745-1-882698.v2
Page 28 of 397
DocuSign
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id:1DA9B1242878461C83EDE070B8A8B35C
Subject: Complete with DocuSign: Suburban Board Representation Agreement 2024 - 2031
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 6 Signatures: 15
Certificate Pages: 7 Initials: 0
AutoNav: Enabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Lois Knutson
lois.knutson@maplewoodmn.gov
IP Address: 199.249.109.79
Record Tracking
Status: Original
12/6/2023 10:32:13 AM
Security Appliance Status: Connected
Storage Appliance Status: Connected
Holder: Lois Knutson
lois.knutson@maplewoodmn.gov
Pool: StateLocal
Pool: City of Maplewood
Location: DocuSign
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Andrea McDowell Poehler
apoehler@ck-law.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/11/2023 2:57:53 PM
ID: 49d7244f-3dd2-4293-be 16-3fd0644dab3e
Cheryl Jacobson
CJacobson@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/11/2023 8:24:17 AM
ID:ccc876b3-el3a-4aa9-ab93-d4ea6dedf934
David Napier
dnapier@wspmn.gov
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/ 14/2023 2:38:49 AM
ID: b2c4bc66-775f-42cf-998f-0f35fa0a83b4
Elliott Knetsch
eknetsch@ck-law.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/9/2023 10:27:32 AM
ID: 184dcb3f-a95f-47e4-9cf8-c6a53c 17d936
r—DocuSigned by:
au Lnna, ( tPewtIL Pbt.uh,r
9A92255A448845D...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 67.130.12.122
DocuSigned by:
t u,c,rtit jaCbteSot&
54ABOC4F45744CA...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 156.142.58.37
f—DocuSi bed by:
D1EFF500B907494...
Signature Adoption: Drawn on Device
Using IP Address: 63.231.147. 183
Signed using mobile
DocuSigned by:
Mott 6Aktsclk,
7132489E07FF42E...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 97.127.30.228
Sent: 12/11/2023 1:54:54 PM
Viewed: 12/11/2023 2:57:53 PM
Signed: 12/11/2023 2:58:08 PM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:15 AM
Viewed: 12/11/2023 8:24:17 AM
Signed: 12/11/2023 8:24:35 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:15 AM
Resent: 12/11/2023 12:10:07 PM
Viewed: 12/14/2023 2:38:49 AM
Signed: 12/14/2023 2:40:18 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:15 AM
Viewed: 12/9/2023 10:27:32 AM
Signed: 12/9/2023 10:27:49 AM
Page 29 of 397
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Heather Butkowski
heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 3:35:56 PM
ID: bfa3b5e2-d5ae-4dc1-995c-27cae5b9d99f
Jack Linehan
jack.linehan@falconheights.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 12:55:26 PM
ID: f769dc94-a7b0-4c7e-bde3-bc29bc0cd865
Mary Gaasch
mary.gaasch@lauderdalemn.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/27/2023 9:26:51 AM
ID: 7442535c-8995-44c8-9965-a0bad2e8efac
Marylee Abrams
marylee.abrams@maplewoodmn.gov
Mayor
City of Maplewood
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 11:18:55 AM
ID: 47afae74-0c4a-4c8d-b4e9-fe35fa62ec6c
Melinda Coleman
melinda.coleman@maplewoodmn.gov
City Manager
City of Maplewood
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 10:58:04 AM
ID: 282d7592-36ed-4f8c-b46c-026df7004fe0
Nathan W Burkett
nburkett@wspmn.gov
City Manager
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
r—DocuSigned by:
tulttcur t5tAfthwsLi
169C29FEE4954D5...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.249.109.13
DocuSigned by:
Avelt,
6CDE38AE149F4DB...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.249.109.13
DocuSig bed by:
IGttaSaG
12OFFCCEE91947A...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 71.195.31.30
r—DocuSigned by:
H44. y& A(.4A4+.4
05E4BC9FB1D8415...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 172.56.12.192
Signed using mobile
c—DocuSigned by:
NtaiLAJa. Cott imat&
EABB780834604FE...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 199.249.109.79
DocuSigned by:
Nt6n, mot,{%
15EE7D6293EB4B9...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 173.29.164.229
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:16 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 3:35:56 PM
Signed: 12/6/2023 3:36:12 PM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:18 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 12:55:26 PM
Signed: 12/6/2023 12:55:55 PM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:16 AM
Resent: 12/11/2023 12:10:08 PM
Resent: 12/18/2023 2:20:20 PM
Resent: 12/20/2023 9:25:08 AM
Viewed: 12/27/ 2023 9:26:51 AM
Signed: 12/27/2023 9:27:14 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:14 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 11:18:55 AM
Signed: 12/6/2023 11:19: 34 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:14 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 10:58:04 AM
Signed: 12/6/2023 10:58:14 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:17 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 10:58:55 AM
Signed: 12/6/2023 10:59:20 AM
Page 30 of 397
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Accepted: 12/6/2023 10:58:55 AM
ID:c2ceb8ca-db2a-49f3-a8fa-7015efe1cff9
Pam Whitmore
pwhitmore@kennedy-graven.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 1:52:07 PM
ID: 8b52a04c-2405-4d21-ad6b-64f47d9b9c3f
Randy Gustafson
randy.gustafson@falconheights.org
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/7/2023 8:26:27 PM
ID:36b8c3ea-2ea1-4623-9a6f-el650fcc6293
Ron Batty
rbatty@kennedy-graven.com
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/6/2023 11:29:25 AM
ID: 710e8a43-396b-489e-bb1a-496a6252c4bd
Stephanie Levine
SLevine@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 12/11/2023 2:47:46 PM
ID:325a2ca9-36f3-4727-91c7-fcc2c4a5d7e0
f—DocuSigned by:
5AA07AD390D6458...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 38.88.188.170
f—DocuSigned by:
at sfarsaln,
5F8AF4F713094B0...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 107.2.103.72
r—DocuSigned by:
role, lath
D81F5E81BAD84EC...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 38.88.188.170
f—DocuSigned by:
S114261Ait, tvLtln t
53F7F33A41B34EE...
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 73.94.171.231
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:17 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 1:52:07 PM
Signed: 12/6/2023 1:52:34 PM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:17 AM
Viewed: 12/7/2023 8:26:27 PM
Signed: 12/7/2023 8:27:23 PM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:14 AM
Viewed: 12/6/2023 11:29:25 AM
Signed: 12/6/2023 11:30:03 AM
Sent: 12/6/2023 10:57:16 AM
Resent: 12/11/2023 12:10:08 PM
Viewed: 12/11/2023 2:47:46 PM
Signed: 12/11/2023 2:48:07 PM
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Page 31 of 397
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 12/6/2023 10:57:18 AM
Envelope Updated Security Checked 12/11/2023 1:54: 53 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 12/11/2023 2:47:46 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 12/11/2023 2:48:07 PM
Completed Security Checked 12/27/2023 9:27:14 AM
Payment Events Status
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure
Timestamps
Page 32 of 397
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 8/ 8/2018 9:00: 59 AM
Parties agreed to: Andrea McDowell Poehler, Cheryl Jacobson, David Napier, Elliott Knetsch, Heather Butkowski, Jack Linehan, Mary Gaasch, Marylee Abrams, Melir
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURE
From time to time, City of Maplewood (we, us or Company) may be required by law to provide
to you certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for
providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically through the DocuSign, Inc.
DocuSign) electronic signing system. Please read the information below carefully and
thoroughly, and if you can access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to
these terms and conditions, please confirm your agreement by clicking the `I agree' button at the
bottom of this document.
Getting paper copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper copy of any record provided or made available
electronically to you by us. You will have the ability to download and print documents we send
to you through the DocuSign system during and immediately after signing session and, if you
elect to create a DocuSign signer account, you may access them for a limited period of time
usually 30 days) after such documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to
send you paper copies of any such documents from our office to you, you will be charged a
0.00 per -page fee. You may request delivery of such paper copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you decide to receive notices and disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time
change your mind and tell us that thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures
only in paper format. How you must inform us of your decision to receive future notices and
disclosure in paper format and withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically is described below.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must
withdraw your consent using the DocuSign `Withdraw Consent' form on the signing page of a
DocuSign envelope instead of signing it. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn your
consent to receive required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no longer
be able to use the DocuSign system to receive required notices and consents electronically from
us or to sign electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through the DocuSign system all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you
inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures
electronically from us.
Page 33 of 397
How to contact City of Maplewood:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to: mychal.fowlds@maplewoodmn.gov
To advise City of Maplewood of your new e-mail address
To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at
mychal.fowlds@maplewoodmn.gov and in the body of such request you must state: your
previous e-mail address, your new e-mail address. We do not require any other information from
you to change your email address..
In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc. to arrange for your new email address to be reflected
in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in the DocuSign system.
To request paper copies from City of Maplewood
To request delivery from us of paper copies of the notices and disclosures previously provided
by us to you electronically, you must send us an e-mail to mychal.fowlds@maplewoodmn.gov
and in the body of such request you must state your e-mail address, full name, US Postal address,
and telephone number. We will bill you for any fees at that time, if any.
To withdraw your consent with City of Maplewood
To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign session, and on the subsequent
page, select the check -box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an e-mail to mychal.fowlds@maplewoodmn.gov and in the body of such
request you must state your e-mail, full name, US Postal Address, and telephone number.
We do not need any other information from you to withdraw consent.. The consequences
of your withdrawing consent for online documents will be that transactions may take a
longer time to process..
Required hardware and software
Operating
Systems:
Browsers:
Windows® 2000, Windows® XP, Windows Vista®; Mac OS® X
Final release versions of Internet Explorer® 6.0 or above (Windows only);
Mozilla Firefox 2.0 or above (Windows and Mac); SafariTM 3.0 or above
Mac only)
PDF Reader: Acr obat® or similar software may be required to view and print PDF files
Page 34 of 397
Screen
Resolution:
800 x 600 minimum
Enabled Security
Settings: Allow per session cookies
These minimum requirements are subject to change. If these requirements change, you will be
asked to re -accept the disclosure. Pre-release (e.g. beta) versions of operating systems and
browsers are not supported.
Acknowledging your access and consent to receive materials electronically
To confirm to us that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to
other electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were
able to read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or
electronically save this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail
this disclosure and consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for
your future reference and access. Further, if you consent to receiving notices and disclosures
exclusively in electronic format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know
by clicking the `I agree' button below.
By checking the `I agree' box, I confirm that:
I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF
ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE DISCLOSURES document; and
I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can
print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless I notify City of Maplewood as described above, I consent to receive from
exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations,
acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to me by City of Maplewood during the course of my relationship with you.
Page 35 of 397
6.f
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve 2026 Fourth of July Fireworks
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the budget expenditure for the city's Fourth of July fireworks display and authorize
the City Administrator to execute the necessary contract and agreements with J & M Displays
and Mendakota Country Club.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the City Council's priority to Enhance City Governance and Services with a focused
strategy to Enhance Connections and Community Partners, Businesses and Residents, the
Council has supported city-sponsored fireworks on Independence Day (July 4).
The City contracted with J & M Displays in 2024 and 2025 to provide the annual fireworks show
and staff was pleased with their event communication, preparation and safety plan. Staff has
reviewed our fireworks program and determined it would be best for J & M Displays to provide
the show in 2026. J & M Displays has been in business for 40 years and has provided fireworks
displays for many jurisdictions within the Twin Cities and throughout the United States
including presenting the Dick Clark New Year's Eve show in New Orleans.
The proposal for 2026 from J & M Displays includes an approximate 18-minute display that is
electronically fired. Fireworks will be delivered utilizing a Department of Transportation HazMat
certified driver and vehicle. J & M Displays are covered under a $10,000,000 insurance policy.
The contract from J & M Displays includes a not-to-exceed amount of $21,500, which is in line
with what other cities plan to pay for a similar show in 2026. The fireworks display is scheduled
for July 4, with July 5 as the backup date.
An agreement between the city, J & M Displays, and Mendakota Country Club is needed. An
agreement was drafted by the City Attorney in 2022 between the City and the fireworks
company and between the City and Mendakota Country Club for access to their property as
the launch site. Staff will update these agreements to be used in 2026.
Page 36 of 397
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The FY2026 budget includes $25,000 for an annual fireworks display. J & M Displays contract
for the fireworks display includes a not-to-exceed amount of $21,500 should the display go as
planned on July 4. Should the City postpone the fireworks show due to weather after the crew
and driver have left the shop with the fireworks in transit and/or set up on site, a 15% increase
in the total cost would be incurred by the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 37 of 397
6.g
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Authorize a Second Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement with
Dakota County to Operate Residential Food Scraps Drop Site
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Authorize the execution of a Second Amendment to the joint powers agreement (JPA) with
Dakota County for continued operations of the residential food scraps drop-off site located at
Mendakota Park.
BACKGROUND:
Metropolitan counties are responsible for waste management policy and programs (Minn.
Stat. §115A.551). On September 23, 2025, the Dakota County Board adopted the 2024-2044
Solid Waste Management Plan. The Solid Waste Management Plan includes a tactic for
continued collaboration and assistance with municipalities for residential food scraps drop-off
sites. The plan also includes a strategy for residential curbside organics collection to be
available in suburban areas by 2030 and a tactic to expand food scrap dropoff sites to areas
not served by residential curbside organics collection (e.g., apartments).
Dakota County and the City of Mendota Heights executed a JPA in 2021 for a six-year term to
operate a residential food scraps drop-off site at Mendakota Park, 2171 Dodd Road, Mendota
Heights. The JPA provides reimbursements to the City of Mendota Heights for recurring
operational costs (compostable bag costs, organics hauling). A First Amendment to the JPA
was approved in October of 2024, to account for increased costs ($29,000) over the initial
agreement period, bringing the total to $57,500. The JPA expires December 31, 2027. Dakota
County and the City of Mendota Heights have expressed mutual interest in amending the JPA
for continued operations for an additional three years (2028-2030), making the drop-site
available until residential curbside organics is required. The City will look at a phased approach
for future drop-off site needs, balanced with the availability of curbside organics collection to
residents.
A Second Amendment to the JPA is necessary to provide funding for an additional three years
Page 38 of 397
of reimbursable operational costs, including increased hauler services to address participation
growth and for the construction of an enclosure to comply with city code. Over 18 percent of
households in Mendota Heights have registered for the drop-off program, which is higher
than the countywide sign-up rate of seven percent. In September 2025, a second collection
container was added to the Mendota Heights drop-off site to manage the added food scraps
from increased resident participation.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Dakota County’s total share of the cost of the JPA with the amendment is projected to be
$138,600. This will be funded entirely through Dakota County and there is no impact to the
City of Mendota Heights' budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.KS21-236-2 C0034100.2 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure,
Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 39 of 397
Dakota County Contract #C0034100.2
1
SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA
AND
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RESIDENTIAL FOOD SCRAPS DROP-OFF SITE
WHEREAS, effective June 1, 2021, the County of Dakota (County) and City of Mendota Heights
(Municipality) entered in a JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (JPA) for the operation of a residential
food scraps drop-off site (formally known as organics drop-off site); and
WHEREAS, effective September 24, 2024, the County and the Municipality amended the JPA to
account for increased costs over the JPA term; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2025, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopted the 2024 -
2044 Dakota County Solid Waste Management Plan, which includes as a goal the continued
collaboration with municipalities for operation of residential food scrap drop-off sites; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the JPA to provide for additional three (3) year term
and reimbursement for the Municipality to continue operating the residential food scraps drop -off site
throughout the term of the JPA; and
WHEREAS, the JPA provides that any amendments shall be valid only when expressed in writing and
duly signed by authorized representatives of both parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agree as
follows:
1.To amend Section 3 TERM to continue in effect until December 31, 2030, or until termination in
accordance with the provisions herein.
2.To add Section 5.2 (P) as follows:
P.Construct or cause to be constructed an enclosure and related necessary infrastructure to
facilitate proper food scraps collection and removal at the drop-off site.
3.To amend Section 6.1 FUNDING AMOUNT to increase the allocated reimbursement funding
for the Municipality by $81,100.00, for a total amount not to exceed $138,600 as set forth in
Exhibit 1, as amended.
4.To replace Exhibit 1 with the following:
Page 40 of 397
Dakota County Contract #C0034100.2
2
Exhibit 1
Allocated Funds
Nine (9) – Year Term
Anticipated reimbursement amount for the City of Mendota Heights Food Scraps Drop -Off Site
Item
Original JPA
Allocation
(2021 – 2027)
First Amendment
Increase
(2021 – 2027)
Proposed Second
Amendment
Increase
(2021 – 2030)
Total Cost
(2021 – 2030)
Enclosure
Construction
$0 $0 $15,000 $15,000
Certified
Compostable Bags
$13,370 $10,827 $23,038 $47,235
Hauling – Collection
& Disposal
$15,130 $18,173 $43,062 $76,365
Total Reimbursement
Amount
$28,500 $29,000 $81,100 138,600
5.All other terms of the JPA between the County and City shall remain in full force and effect
unless otherwise amended or terminated in accordance with law or the terms of the Contract.
6.In any case where this Amendment conflicts with the original JPA or the First Amendment to
JPA, this Amendment shall govern.
Remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.
Page 41 of 397
Dakota County Contract #C0034100.2
3
COUNTY OF DAKOTA CITYOF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By: __________________________ By: _________________________
Georg T. Fischer, Director Stephanie Levine, Mayor
Physical Development Division Date of Signature: _____________
Date of Signature: ______________
Attest: ___________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Date of Signature: __________________
Dakota County Board Resolution:
No. 25-549
Date: November 18, 2025
Page 42 of 397
Dakota County Contract #C0034100.2
4
Joint Powers Agreement Amendment Allocated Funds
Nine (9) – Year Term
Anticipated reimbursement amount for the City of Mendota Heights Food Scraps Drop-Off Site
Item
Original JPA
Allocation
(2021 – 2027)
First Amendment
Increase
(2021 – 2027)
Proposed Second
Amendment
Increase
(2021 – 2030)
Total Cost
(2021 – 2030)
Enclosure
Construction
$0 $0 $15,000 $15,000
Certified
Compostable Bags
$13,370 $10,827 $23,038 $47,235
Hauling – Collection
& Disposal
$15,130 $18,173 $43,062 $76,365
Total Reimbursement
Amount
$28,500 $29,000 $81,100 138,600
Page 43 of 397
6.h
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve the 2026 Community Waste Abatement Agreement with Dakota
County
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the 2026 Community Waste Abatement Grant Agreement allowing the City to
continue to receive reimbursement funding from Dakota County for waste abatement services
provided by the city and authorize the City Administrator to act as the authorized signer, to
execute the 2026 grant agreement for community waste abatement.
BACKGROUND:
Mendota Heights is proposed to receive approximately $28,304 in community funding from
Dakota County in 2026 to assist in its recycling efforts. Funding for 2026 will go toward
residential communications, municipal facilities/park verification and education, special
collections, multifamily recycling, reduce/reuse activities, in-person education, event recycling
and organics collection.
There is one change to the Community Waste Abatement grant for 2026 as the City of
Mendota Heights will take over as the grant's fiscal agent.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Funding has been included in the FY2026 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.2026 Community Waste Abatement Grant Agreement
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure,
Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 44 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 5 of 10
COMMUNITY WASTE ABATEMENT
2026 GRANT AGREEMENT
This Community Waste Abatement Grant Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into by and between the County
of Dakota, acting through its Environmental Resources Department (County) and The City of Mendota Heights (Grantee)
acting on behalf of itself and for the cities of Lilydale, South Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West Saint Paul.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan counties are responsible for waste management policy and programs (Minn. Stat. §115A.551);
and
WHEREAS, Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance 110 requires each municipality in the County to have a solid waste
abatement program that is consistent with the Dakota County Solid Waste Management Plan (Management Plan),
formally known as the solid waste master plan; and
WHEREAS, the Management Plan governs all solid waste management in the County (Minn. Stat. § 115A.46); and
WHEREAS, municipalities may not develop or implement a solid waste management activity that is inconsistent with the
Management Plan (Minn. Stat. § 115A.46); and
WHEREAS, the Management Plan supports performance-based funding for municipalities to develop and implement
waste abatement programs, education, and outreach; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 19-577 (June 18, 2019), the Dakota County Board of Commissioners approved the
Community Waste Abatement Grant Program (Grant Program); and
WHEREAS, funding amounts for the Grant Program are established by the County Board each year as part of the
Environmental Resources Department (Department) budget; and
WHEREAS, the cities of Mendota Heights, Lilydale, South Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West Saint Paul have entered
into a Joint Powers Agreement under which Mendota Heights has agreed to perform certain Grant Program activities on
behalf of all of the cities; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee agrees to perform all activities described in this Agreement and Dakota County Waste
Abatement Community Grant Program Exhibit 1 (Guidelines) and Exhibit 2 (Application) to the satisfaction of the County.
NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained in this Agreement, the County and the Grantee agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1.PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide grant funding to eligible municipalities to implement solid
waste abatement activities as described in this Agreement and Exhibits 1 and 2.
2.ELIGIBILITY. The cities of Mendota Heights, Lilydale, South Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West Saint Paul are all
eligible municipalities for the purposes of the Grant Program.
3.PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are the County and Grantee, collectively referred to as the “parties”.
4.TERM. Notwithstanding the dates of signatures of the parties to this Agreement, this Agreement shall commence on
January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, (grant calendar year) for the purposes of completing activities identified
in Exhibit 2 and shall continue until April 1, 2027, for the purpose of reimbursement, unless earlier terminated by law
or according to the provisions of this Agreement.
5.GRANTEE OBLIGATIONS. The Grantee shall:
A.Develop, implement, and operate a local comprehensive landfill abatement program that complies with the
Management Plan, Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance 110, this Agreement, and Exhibits 1 and 2.
B.Fulfill all responsibilities for Base and, if applicable, for Supplemental Funding as outlined in Exhibit 1.
C.Report time, expense, and performance pursuant to responsibilities set forth in this Agreement using County
report forms (Exhibit 2) and additional agreed-upon reporting tools provided by the County Liaison.
Page 45 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 5 of 10
6.ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE EXPENSES. Grantee may use allocated funds only on eligible items as identified in
Exhibit 1 and completed within the grant calendar year of this Agreement. Other waste abatement expenses may be
eligible with prior written approval from the County Liaison.
7.FUNDING AMOUNT. Grantees receive performance-based funding in part from a pass-through grant from the State.
Funding amounts are contingent upon available State and County funds and reflect the funding levels approved by
the County Board as part of the annual budget. Base Funding is allocated for required grant activities, including
administration, residential communications, municipal facilities/parks verification and employee education, and special
collections. . Optional Supplemental Funding is allocated for multiunit recycling, additional special collections,
reduce/reuse activities, in-person education, event recycling, organics planning, and to meet funding gaps in eligible
grant categories. The allocated funding for the Grantee shall be in the total amount not to exceed $116,667.69, as set
forth in Exhibit 2.
8.FISCAL AGENT. Pursuant to the cities’ Joint Powers Agreement, Mendota Heights acknowledges that it shall act as
Fiscal Agent for the cities for purposes of receiving the Funding Amount, performing the landfill abatement program
activities identified in Exhibit 2 and o therwise complying with the terms of this Agreement. The cities of Lilydale, South
Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West Saint Paul will sign this Agreement for purposes of accepting Mendota Heights’
designation of Fiscal Agent to act on the cities’ behalf for purposes of the Grant Program, but shall not be considered
parties to this Agreement.
9.FUNDING MATCH. Grantee and the cities of Lilydale, South Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and West Saint Paul shall
provide a 25% match of the total reimbursed grant funding amount through a cash match, in-kind contribution, or
combination thereof, to pay for any new or ongoing activities that are instituted by the grant (i.e., any eligible
expenses, whether new or ongoing).
10.FUNDING SOURCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Grantee and the cities of Lilydale, South Saint Paul, Sunfish Lake, and
West Saint Paul shall provide funding source credit on all print materials relating to the activities funded under this
Agreement, written as: Partially funded by Dakota County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
11.RECORDS. The Grantee shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of
the County and the State of Minnesota. The Grantee shall manage funds in a dedicated bank account, maintain strict
accountability of all funds and maintain records of all receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be
maintained in a form which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. All records and
accounts shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than five years from the last receipt
of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement.
12.PERFORMANCE REPORTING AND REIMBURSEMENT. Grantees shall report performance of responsibilities set
forth in this Agreement and Exhibits 1 and 2 on a report form provided by the County. Grantees may request
reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other funds received, incurred in c onnection with the
performance of activities in accordance with this Agreement and Exhibits 1 and 2 on a reimbursement form provided
by the County.
Reimbursement requests must be submitted to the County Liaison by July 15 of the grant calendar year and by
January 15 following the grant calendar year. The Grantee must certify that the requested reimbursements are
accurate, appropriate and eligible in accordance with this Agreement, that the Grantee has submitted complete
documentation of the actual expenditures for which reimbursement is sought, and that such expenditures have not
been otherwise reimbursed.
Reimbursement requests must be supported by documentation such as vendor invoices, receipts, or detailed financial
reports produced using municipal accounting software, itemizing all expenses related to the grant, including salary
and benefits. Any reimbursement request for multiple municipalities must separately itemize the request for
reimbursement for each individual municipality.
Reimbursement request payment will not be made for activities with incomplete documentation. Complete
reimbursement requests are reviewed by the County Liaison. Payment for approved reimbursement requests will be
made to the Grantee within 30 calendar days of approved reimbursement request submissions. Reimbursements will
be made for approved expenditures incurred within the grant calendar year. No reimbursements will be made for
reimbursement requests received after February 15 following the grant calendar year.
Page 46 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 5 of 10
13.FAILURE TO PERFORM. Upon review of each Grantee report, the County Liaison will notify the Grantee in writing of
any unsatisfactory performance. Reimbursements will be authorized only for activities performed to the satisfaction of
the County within the terms of this Agreement.
14.AMENDMENTS. The Dakota County Environmental Resources Director (Director) shall have the authority to approve
in writing modifications to the Funding Amount as requested by the Grantee, as long as the amount payable does not
exceed the total Funding Amount identified in Section 7 and so long as the proposed modifications are consistent
with the Agreement and Exhibits 1 and 2. The County Liaison shall have the authority to approve in writing
modifications to the Application activities and related expenses identified in Exhibit 2 up to the Funding Amount, as
requested by the Grantee, so long as the proposed modifications are consistent with the Program Guidelines (Exhibit
1) and this Agreement.
15.PROPERTY. Upon termination of this Agreement or unless otherwise specified, any eligible infrastructure purchased
by the Grantee or by the County and provided to the Grantee to fulfill Grant obligations shall be the sole property of
the Grantee.
16.INDEMNIFICATION. Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for the acts of its officers, employees or agents and
the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party, its
officers, employees or agents. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 and other
applicable laws govern liability of the County and Grantee. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration
or termination of this Agreement.
17.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES: The following named persons are designated as the Authorized
Representatives of the Parties for purposes of this Agreement. These persons have authority to bind the party they
represent and to consent to modifications, except that the Authorized Representa tives shall have only the authority
specifically granted by their respective governing boards. The parties shall provide written notification to each other of
any change to the Authorized Representative. Notice required to be pr ovided pursuant this Agreement shall be
provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, or in a
modification of this Agreement.
TO THE COUNTY TO THE GRANTEE
Nikki Stewart, Director, or successor Cheryl Jacobson, or successor, City Administrator
Environmental Resources Department City of Mendota Heights
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
18.LIAISONS. To assist the parties in the day-to-day performance of this Agreement, to ensure compliance, and provide
ongoing consultation, a liaison shall be designated by the County and the Grantee. The County and the Grantee shall
keep each other continually informed, in writing, of any change in the designated liaison. At the time of execution of
this Agreement, the following persons are the designated liaisons:
COUNTY LIAISON GRANTEE LIAISON
Gena Gerard Courtney Selstad
Senior Environmental Specialist Mendota Heights Recycling Coordinator
952-891-7021 1101 Victoria Curve
gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us Mendota Heights, MN 55118
19.TERMINATION, GENERAL. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause by giving seven days’ written notice
or without cause by giving thirty (30) days written notice, of its intent to terminate, to the other party. Such notice to
terminate for cause shall specify the circumstances warranting termination of the Agreement. Cause shall mean a
material breach of this Agreement and any supplemental agreements or amendments thereto. Notice of Termination
shall be made by certified mail or personal delivery to the Authorized Representative of the other party. In addition,
notification to the County or the Grantee regarding termination of this Agreement by the other party shall be provided to
the Office of the Dakota County Attorney, Civil Division, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033. Termination of this
Agreement shall not discharge any liability, responsibility or right of any party, which arises from the performance of or
failure to adequately perform the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination.
20.TERMINATION BY COUNTY FOR LACK OF FUNDING. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, the County may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota
Legislature, Minnesota Agencies, or other funding source, or if its funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to
Page 47 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 5 of 10
allow payment of the amounts due under this Agreement. Written notice of termination sent by the County to the
Grantee by email or facsimile is sufficient notice under this section. The County is not obligated to pay for any
activities that are provided after written notice of termination for lack of funding. The County will not be assessed any
penalty or damages if the Agreement is terminated due to lack of funding.
21.USE OF CONTRACTORS. The Grantee may engage contractors to perform activities funded pursuant to this
Agreement. However, the Grantee retains primary responsibility to the County for performance of the activities and
the use of such contractors does not relieve the Grantee fro m any of its obligations under this Agreement. If the
Grantee engages any contractors to perform any part of the activities, the Grantee agrees that the contract for such
services shall include the following provisions:
A.The contractor must maintain all records and provide all reporting as required by this Agreement.
B.The contractor must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless and save the County from all claims, suits, demands,
damages, judgments, costs, interest, and expenses arising out of or by reason of the performance of the
contracted work, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the contractor, including
negligent acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be
liable.
C.The contractor must provide and maintain insurance through the term of this Agreement in amounts and types
of coverage as set forth in the Insurance Terms, which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit 3, and provide
to the County, prior to commencement of the contracted work, a certificate of insurance evidencing such
insurance coverage.
D.The contractor must be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the contracted work.
E.The contractor must acknowledge that the contract between the Grantee and the contractor does not create
any contractual relationship between County and the contractor.
F.The contractor shall perform and complete the activities in full compliance with this Agreement and all applicable
laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions
having jurisdiction over the activities.
G.The contractor must use County toolkits (i.e., text, content, images) and follow the County’s Waste Abatement
Education and Outreach Style Guide to provide standardized messaging.
22.EMPLOYEES OF PARTIES. Any and all persons engaged in administrating the Grant Program for the County shall
not be considered employees of the Grantee, for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all
claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any
and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while
so engaged shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the Grantee.
Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by the Grantee arising from this Agreement shall not be
considered employees of the County for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all claims that
may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employee while so engaged. Any and all claims
made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omissions of the part of the Grantee’s employees while so
engaged on any of the work arising from this Agreement shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of
partners or joint ventures between the County and the Grantee, nor shall the County be considered or deemed an
agent or representative of the Grantee, and the Grantee shall not be deemed an agent or representative of the
County.
23.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/STANDARDS. The County and Grantee agree to abide by all federal, state or local
laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations now in effect or hereafter adopted pertaining to this Agreement or to
the facilities, programs and staff for which either party is responsible, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. § 115A,
which requires cities to collect recyclable materials at all facilities under their control, wherever trash is collected, and
to transfer the recyclable materials to a recycler.
Page 48 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 5 of 10
24.EXCUSED DEFAULT – FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable to the other party for any loss or damage
resulting from a delay or failure to perform due to unforeseeable acts or events outside the defaulting party's
reasonable control, providing the defaulting party gives notice to the other party as soon as possible. Acts and events
may include acts of God, acts of terrorism, war, fire, flood, epidemic, acts of civil or military authority, and natural
disasters.
25.CONTRACT RIGHTS CUMULATIVE NOT EXCLUSIVE.
A.In General. All remedies available to either party for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and may be
exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of
such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. The rights and remedies provided in this Agreement are not
exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law.
B.Waiver. Any waiver is only valid when reduced to writing, specifically identified as a waiver, and signed by the
waiving party’s Authorized Representative. A waiver is not an amendment to the Contract. The County’s
failure to enforce any provision of this Contract does not waive the provision or the County’s right to enforce it.
26.RECORDS RETENTION AND AUDITS. Each party’s bonds, records, documents, papers, accounting procedures and
practices, and other records relevant to this Agreement are subject to the examination, duplication, transcription and
audit by the other party, the Legislative Auditor or State Auditor under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5. If any funds
provided under this Agreement use federal funds these records are also subject to review by the Comptroller General
of the United States and his or her approved representative. Following termination of this Agreement, the parties must
keep these records for at least six years or longer if any audit-in-progress needs a longer retention time.
27.MODIFICATIONS. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall only
be valid when they have been reduced to writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the County and
Grantee.
28.ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of
the other party. Consent under this section may be subject to conditions.
29.GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES. For purposes of this Agreement, all data on individuals collected, created,
received, maintained or disseminated shall be administered consistent with the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13.
30.MINNESOTA LAW TO GOVERN. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
substantive and procedural laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All
proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Dakota County, Minnesota or U.S. District Court, District of
Minnesota. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
31.MERGER. This Agreement is the final expression of the agreement of the parties and the complete and exclusive
statement of the terms agreed upon and shall supersede all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. There
are no representations, warranties, or provisions, either oral or written, not contained herein.
32.SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is
rendered void, invalid, or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder
of this Agreement unless the part or parts that are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair
the value of the entire Agreement with respect to either party.
33.ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. Each party agrees that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Contract
are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as wet ink signatures.
Signature pages follow.
Page 49 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 6 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date(s) indicated below.
FOR DAKOTA COUNTY
(I represent and warrant that I am authorized to
execute this contract on behalf of Dakota County.)
By:
Nikki Stewart, Director
Environmental Resources Department
Date of signature:
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
(I represent and warrant that I am authorized by law to
execute this contract and legally bind the Grantee.)
By:
Signature line
Printed Name:
Title:
Date of signature:
Attest:
Title:
Date:
Page 50 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 7 of 10
CITY OF LILYDALE
(Accepting designation of Mendota Heights as Fiscal
Agent to act on behalf of the City of Lilydale for
purposes of the Community Waste Abatement Grant
Agreement between Dakota County and the City of
Mendota Heights.)
By:
Signature line
Printed Name:
Title:
Date of signature:
Attest:
Title:
Date:
Page 51 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 8 of 10
CITY OF SOUTH SAINT PAUL
(Accepting designation of Mendota Heights as Fiscal
Agent to act on behalf of the City of South Saint Paul
for purposes of the Community Waste Abatement
Grant Agreement between Dakota County and the City
of Mendota Heights.)
By:
Signature line
Printed Name:
Title:
Date of signature:
Attest:
Title:
Date:
Page 52 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 9 of 10
CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE
(Accepting designation of Mendota Heights as Fiscal
Agent to act on behalf of the City of Sunfish Lake for
purposes of the Community Waste Abatement Grant
Agreement between Dakota County and the City of
Mendota Heights.)
By:
Signature line
Printed Name:
Title:
Date of signature:
Attest:
Title:
Date:
Page 53 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
2026 Grant Agreement P a g e | 10 of 10
CITY OF WEST SAINT PAUL
(Accepting designation of Mendota Heights as Fiscal
Agent to act on behalf of the City of West Saint Paul for
purposes of the Community Waste Abatement Grant
Agreement between Dakota County and the City of
Mendota Heights.)
By:
Signature line
Printed Name:
Title:
Date of signature:
Attest:
Title:
Date:
Page 54 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 1 of 14
Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program
2026 Guidelines
I.Grant Overview
A.Municipalities in Dakota County have responsibilities to establish and maintain comprehensive local
waste abatement programs to support implementation of the Dakota County 2024-2044 Solid
Waste Management Plan (Management Plan). Dakota County provides educational, financial, and
technical assistance to municipal governments to aid local waste abatement programs. The Dakota
County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program (Program) assists municipalities with waste
abatement expenses.
II.Grant Eligibility
A.Dakota County municipalities are eligible for the Program, excluding Dakota County townships and
the cities of Coates, Empire, Hampton, Miesville, New Trier, Randolph, and Vermillion.
B.Municipalities, other than those listed above, with fewer than 1,000 households are eligible for
limited funding in specific categories.
C.To be eligible for Municipal Facilities funding, municipality must have at least one municipal facility
to verify or at least one employee to educate, other than the municipality’s primary contact for the
Program (Municipality Primary Contact).
D.To be eligible for Multiunit Recycling funding, municipality must have multiunit residential housing.
III.Grant Funding Allocation and Match
A.Funding amounts are determined annually by the County Board of Commissioners.
B.Base Funding: Base Funding is allocated for required grant activities, including administration,
residential communications, municipal facilities/parks verification and employee education, and
special collections.
C.Supplemental Funding: Optional Supplemental Funding is allocated for multiunit recycling,
additional special collections, reduce/reuse activities, in-person education, event recycling, organics
planning, and gap funding.
D.Matching Funds: Eligible municipalities must provide a 25% match of the total reimbursed grant
funding amount (Base Funding plus Supplemental Funding) through a cash match, in-kind
contribution, or combination thereof, to pay for any activities that are instituted by the grant (i.e.,
any eligible expenses, whether new or ongoing). Any expenses that are not listed in these guidelines
as Eligible Expenses are ineligible for matching funds unless pre-approved by the County Liaison.
Page 55 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 2 of 14
E. Fund Eligibility Limits and Flexibility: a fund allocation maximum is set for each Base and
Supplemental Funding grant category to align funding levels with Solid Waste Management Plan
priorities, diversion potential, and other criteria, as defined in the Fund Allocation document. Fund
allocations may be adjusted from one category to another, up to 50% from Organics Planning to any
other category, and up to 10% for all other categories, while not exceeding the total fund allocation
for a given year, with prior written approval from the County Liaison.
IV. Grant Application Instructions
A. Conduct a planning process with communications, facilities, and event recycling staff and others
who will be responsible for coordination and implementation, to collectively determine that
activities included in the Application and Application Budget are feasible, realistic, and achievable.
B. Complete the Application and the Application Budget, excluding areas for reporting.
C. Include primary contact, secondary contact, and application reviewers for each municipality
participating in the grant agreement.
D. Use whole numbers for staff hours included in Application Budget.
E. If multiple municipalities submit one Application, the Application Budget must itemize descriptions,
costs, and funding requests for each municipality. Insert additional rows as needed.
F. Submit Application and Application Budget by October 1, 2025 to County Liaison for review. Email
to: gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us.
G. Finalize Application with County Liaison and collect signature of authorized representative.
H. Submit signed Application to County Liaison for approval. Email to: gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us.
I. Obtain Grant Agreement from Dakota County.
J. Execute Grant Agreement.
V. Funding Requests
Part 1: Base Funding Request (Required)
1. Grant Administration
Required Activities:
A. Fulfill responsibilities necessary for effective grant administration and demonstrate performance of
waste abatement programs.
Page 56 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 3 of 14
B.Ensure named Municipality Primary Contact is properly trained to fulfill grant responsibilities by
attending the Dakota County Recycling Ambassador course.
C.Participate in solid waste management training to support effective implementation of grant
activities, including at minimum:
1.Annual RAM/SWANA conference
2.Association of Recycling Managers (ARM) meetings
3.Annual ARM workshop
D.Ensure Municipality Primary Contact attends the six Program meetings hosted by Dakota County.
E.Refer businesses, schools, multiunit properties, and other organizations to county Program
Managers to coordinate all requests for resources (e.g., education, containers, labels).
F.Provide reasonable support to implement the Solid Waste Management Plan, including but not
limited to:
1.Share city license list of any vape/tobacco stores with County Liaison for purposes of county
education on proper used vape/battery management.
2.Update local codes as appropriate to be consistent with and no less restrictive than County
Ordinance 110.
G.Demonstrate Program compliance and waste abatement metrics in mid-year and final reports that
include information for all Base and Supplemental funded projects, as described in Reporting and
Reimbursement below.
H.Submit reimbursement requests by county deadlines with substantiating documentation, as
described in Reporting and Reimbursement below.
Optional Activities:
I.Participate in the annual RAM compost bin sale.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage of municipal personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working
on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Solid waste training and professional memberships to support effective implementation of Base
Funding or Supplemental Funding activities.
C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news,
printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement
standardized messaging.
D.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
Page 57 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 4 of 14
2.Residential Communications
Required Activities:
A.Mail county-developed articles on each of the following themes to all residential households, with a
half page minimum per topic:
1.Home recycling
2.Household hazardous waste management (The Recycling Zone)
3.Food scraps reduction or management
4.Reduce/reuse opportunities
B.Post at least one county-developed waste abatement social media message per month using
county-provided messaging (e.g., county messaging toolkit, share county media posts).
C.Request county approval of any proposed modifications to county-developed articles or social
media posts at least two weeks before the municipal deadline for printing or publishing.
D.Stock brochure racks at city-owned/operated facilities with county-provided waste abatement print
materials (i.e., What Goes Where guides, Fix-It-Clinic flyers, etc.).
E.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents including use county
translated waste abatement messaging/materials as appropriate.
F.Maintain waste management information on the municipal website following county guidance in
coordination with the County Liaison, keeping information and links current.
G.Serve as a resource to residents on waste abatement-related inquiries (e.g., email, phone).
H.Provide funding source credit on all print materials, written as: Partially funded by Dakota County
and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Percentage of cost for design, production, and postage for municipality newsletter devoted to waste
abatement articles on topics listed in Required Activities above using county standardized messaging
articles and images.
C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news,
printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement
standardized messaging.
D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
E.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
Page 58 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 5 of 14
3.Municipal Facilities
Required Activities:
A.Provide verification of best waste management practices and recycling compliance at least once
annually, by visually inspecting and reporting status using the Municipal Facilities Recycling Tool.
B.Provide county-required recycling educational messaging to each municipal employee, volunteer,
tenant, and custodial/housekeeping staff who generates and sorts trash and recycling, within 30
days of hire and at least annually thereafter.
C.Conduct in-person training on recycling requirements for municipalities with city personnel who are
responsible for (a) recycling container placement and monitoring on city-owned/operated property,
(b)emptying trash, recycling, and organics containers on city-owned/operated property, (c) handling
event permits or facility rental applications, and (d) staffing events subject to city recycling
requirements.
Optional Activities:
D.Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to educate municipal leaders and
employees about the local recycling and waste management system.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Copying and printing waste abatement education materials for municipal employees and vendors,
using county messaging standards.
C.Fees for tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities.
D.Interpretive services.
E.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
4.Special Collections
Required Activities:
A.Implement collections of all of the following materials that are challenging for residents to recycle or
compost, using the method specified, with an independent collection for each city having 1,000
households or more and a co-collection for each city having fewer than 1,000 households (i.e., in
collaboration with an adjacent city):
1.Holiday lights: free collection for recycling during and after winter holidays
Page 59 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 6 of 14
2.Mattresses and box springs: drop off discount for recycling and reuse, curbside pickup
discount for recycling and reuse, or one-day collection, with reuse required for materials in
good condition
3.Paper: free collection for shredding and recycling confidential documents
4.Pumpkins: free collection for composting after Halloween
5.Scrap metal: free or partly-subsidized collection for recycling if city hosts a cleanup day
B.Implement a free collection of yard signs for recycling after fall elections, as a single-city or multi-city
event (i.e., in collaboration with one or more adjacent cities).
C.Promote all city-led special collections through social media, videos, e-news, print media, or other
outreach/media channels, specifying how materials will be managed (i.e., recycling, reuse, or both).
D.Request and report weights, cubic yards, or number of units for each material collected, as specified
on the county reporting tool.
E.Coordinate timing of special collections with County Liaison to prevent duplication of effort, timing
overlap, conflicting messages, pricing conflicts, and confusion for residents.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities (i.e., for
collection of materials listed above).
B.Vendor services, less resident fees, to collect materials listed above with confirmed delivery to a
reuse location or to a licensed recycling/organics facility, or to another facility approved by the
County Liaison.
C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news,
printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement
standardized messaging.
D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
E.Equipment (e.g., grabbers) and personal protective equipment for volunteers working on collections
for materials listed above.
F.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
Part 2: Supplemental Funding Request (Optional)
5.Multiunit Recycling
Required Activities:
Page 60 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 7 of 14
A.Provide technical assistance for participants in the Dakota County Multiunit Recycling Program by:
1.Conducting broad-based outreach through multiple communication channels
2.Reaching out to an agreed-upon number of potential new participants and past participants
in coordination with the County Liaison
3.Responding to requests for assistance
4.Completing needs assessments, applications, and data-collection mechanisms
5.Implementing infrastructure and education plans
6.Advancing site-specific solutions for increased waste diversion, waste reduction, and reuse
B.Maintain an annually updated list of addresses and contacts for multiunit properties that are eligible
for the Program, and share with Dakota County.
C.Provide an annual mailing about Program resources to multiunit property managers and/or owners
in coordination with County Liaison.
Optional Activities:
D.Coordinate with the County Liaison to revise multiunit recycling mechanisms (e.g., business license
renewals, rental license renewals, rental inspections, fire inspections, and property manager
meetings) and municipal planning and construction procedures to support recycling in new or
remodeled buildings (e.g., recycling chutes, adequate space), consistent with city recycling codes
and county ordinances.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
6.Reduce/Reuse Activities
Required Activities:
A.Host a free drop box for donations of reusable athletic equipment if there are no permanent
physical locations to reuse (e.g. donate, buy, sell, exchange) within the city.
B.Promote existing reuse opportunities for athletic equipment, furniture, and building materials (e.g.,
curbside pickup, drop-off, online exchange, other), through two or more of the following: social
media, videos, e-news, print media, or other outreach/media channels.
C.Promote city-led reuse opportunities for optional materials in (H) through at least one
outreach/media channel.
Page 61 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 8 of 14
D.Obtain and report weights for each material collected, donated, or exchanged, as specified on the
county reporting tool.
E.Ensure that usable leftover items are donated or reused after each city-led reuse opportunity, to the
extent possible.
F.Track and report number of people participating in all staffed reuse activities by monitoring
participation using a sign-in sheet or clicker.
G.Provide updates to the online Dakota County Reduce & Reuse Map.
Optional Activities:
H.Implement free or low-cost reuse opportunities (e.g., swap event, collection for donation, curbside
pickup discount, drop box) for materials that are challenging for residents to reuse, along with an
interactive educational activity for in-person events (i.e., as described in 7A), using the best method
of reuse based on data available. Preference must be given to materials and methods that meet all
of the following criteria, with priority given to building materials and furniture, and a limit of one
activity per city for materials that do not meet these criteria:
1.Significant diversion – at least 0.5 ton per event or activity
2.Fills a gap – no permanent physical location to reuse (e.g., donate, buy, sell, exchange)
within the city
3.Convenient and accessible – including consideration for transportation and physical barriers
4.Confirmed reuse outlet and end use
5.Does not duplicate, interfere, or compete with private sector services
I.Attend Reuse Minnesota meetings.
J.Attend Responsible Public Purchasing Council meetings.
K.Switch to reusable dishware (e.g., washable dishes and silverware) at permanent city-owned
facilities.
L.Provide and collect reusable dishware (e.g., washable baskets, cups) at community events on city
property with at least 300 attendees to reduce single-use products use.
M.Provide assistance at Dakota County Fix-It Clinics held in the city, if applicable.
N.Host residential reduce, reuse, or repair education classes using county messaging, ensuring all hired
educators are approved in advance by the County Liaison, and reporting on outcomes by monitoring
presentation attendance (e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar attendance (e.g.,
number of people who log on), table interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game interactions
(e.g., clicker or tally sheet).
O.Facilitate changes to municipality policies to increase reuse opportunities in the community (e.g.,
clothing drop box prohibitions, rental companies, and secondhand stores) or internal operations
(e.g., office supplies, equipment).
P.Other as approved by County Liaison (e.g., repair event or coupon).
Page 62 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 9 of 14
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities described in
Required and Optional Activities above).
B.Vendor services, less resident fees, to collect materials listed above at a residential drop-off day,
event, or permanent collection option (drop-off site, curbside collection) with confirmed delivery to
a reuse, recycling, or organics facility.
C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news,
printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement
standardized messaging.
D.Reuse training and professional memberships to support effective implementation of
reduction/reuse activities.
E.Fees for county-approved professional educators and performers who help implement required
education activities on topics listed above and comply with county messaging standards.
F.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
G.Washable dishware to replace single-use products, as described in Optional Activities above.
H.Dishwasher up to $2,000 at city-owned facilities, including dishwashing carts and racks; must be
Energy Star qualified.
I.County-approved promotional items or professional services up to $500 in value that create minimal
waste and engage residents in reduce/reuse activities described above.
J.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
7.In-Person Education
Required Activities:
A.Provide resident waste abatement education at events or gatherings, in person or online, to educate
at least 1% of the municipality’s population through interactive activities between city staff and
residents (e.g., ed kits, games, conversations, teaching, presentations), on all four of the following
topics, with a focus on one or two topics per event; does not include display views or brochure
distribution:
1.Home recycling
2.Residential food scraps drop site(s)
3.The Recycling Zone services
4.Local reduce/reuse opportunities (e.g., repair)
Page 63 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 10 of 14
B.Promote city-led education opportunities in (A) through at least one outreach/media channel.
C.Ensure all staff and volunteers who implement In-Person Education activities are properly trained to
fulfill responsibilities by attending the Dakota County Recycling Ambassador course and using
current county messaging.
D.Ensure all professional educators who implement In-Person Education activities are approved in
advance by County Liaison.
E.Use county education materials, display materials, and presentation slides.
F.Coordinate with County Liaison for any education requests in schools, businesses, and multiunit
residences.
G.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents including using county
translated waste abatement messaging/materials as appropriate.
H.Track and report number of people educated in person by monitoring presentation participation
(e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar participation (e.g., number of people who log on),
verbal tabling activity interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game interactions (e.g., clicker or
tally sheet).
Optional Activities:
I.Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to educate residents about the local
recycling and waste management system.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities (i.e., only
activities described in Required and Optional Activities above; does not include brochure
distribution, or any activities lacking an educational in-person or online face-to-face interaction and
direct learning experience).
B.Tablecloths, table runners, banners, signage, sign boards, stands, brochure holders, and other
materials needed for engagement and education.
C.Event, booth, and room rental fees.
D.Fees for county-approved professional educators and performers who help implement required
education activities on topics listed above and comply with county messaging standards.
E.Fees for tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities.
F.County-approved promotional items or professional services up to $500 in value that create minimal
waste and engage residents in education activities described above.
G.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
Page 64 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 11 of 14
H.Interpretive services.
I.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
8.Event Recycling
Required Activities:
A.Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection, or both, at events,
tournaments, and festivals held on city-owned property:
1.Contact and assist city event coordinators to plan and implement recycling collection.
2.Provide an appropriate number of co-located recycling and trash containers in strategic
locations to prevent overflow, along with proper bags and signage.
3.Provide required county waste abatement messaging to educate vendors, volunteers, and
custodial staff about event recycling requirements.
B.Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection, or both, at household
parties (i.e., non-city events) upon request.
C.Update two or more municipal forms (e.g., event permit, event vendor agreement, facility rental
agreement) using county model messaging to include recycling requirements for events,
tournaments, and festivals, consistent with city codes and county ordinance.
Optional Activities:
D.Add waste abatement infrastructure (i.e., recycling and organics containers, lids, labels, and signage)
in municipality-controlled facilities (e.g., buildings, parks, and roadways) where containers are
needed and have not yet been placed, (i.e., replacing containers is an ineligible expense) using the
county-developed container purchasing checklist.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.X-frame containers, X-Frame bags for recyclables, grabbers, green five-gallon buckets, signage,
promotion, and other materials necessary for successful project implementation at events.
C.Recycling hauling services of collected materials from city events, tournaments, and festivals, with
confirmed delivery to a facility licensed to manage the material.
D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
E.Recycling and organics containers or multi-stream containers, lids, lanyards, and labels/signage
necessary to fulfill Optional Activities described above, consistent with the county-developed
Page 65 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 12 of 14
container purchasing checklist. Trash receptacles are only eligible as part of a multi-stream
container (i.e., the Program does not fund stand-alone trash containers).
F.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
9.Organics Planning
Optional Activities:
A.Support research and planning for residential curbside organics collection.
B.Support research and planning for new organics drop sites.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage of municipal personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working
on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance.
C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
10.Gap Funding
Required Activities:
A.Complete, or make progress toward completing, one or more waste abatement projects included in
eligible grant categories above, for which additional funding is needed, with first priority given to
filling funding gaps in Base Funding categories, second priority given to filling gaps in Supplemental
Funding categories, and third priority given to conducting waste abatement activities that are not
included in Base Funding or Supplemental Funding, with prior written County Liaison approval.
Eligible Expenses:
A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while
working directly on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities.
B.Expenses for completion of projects that are eligible, as defined in Required Activities, Optional
Activities, and Eligible Expenses sections.
C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County
Liaison.
Page 66 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 13 of 14
VI.Ineligible Expenses
The following expenses are ineligible for funding:
A.Expenses that are not specified as an eligible expense above, unless written approval has been
obtained from the County Liaison.
B.Expenses related to non-waste abatement waste issues (e.g., energy, water, sustainability).
C.Expenses related to land disposal of materials, and collection and management of banned materials,
trash, hazardous and household hazardous waste and business waste, unless specifically identified
above (e.g., residential compact fluorescent bulb collection, multi-stream containers).
D.Expenses related to city code amendments and enforcement (e.g., code compliance administration,
inspections).
E.Municipality-generated waste management.
F.Infrastructure purchases (e.g., containers, bags) as part of Organics Planning.
G.Dishwasher replacement, electrical costs, and plumbing costs related to dishwasher installation.
H.Design/print of education and communications print materials not described above, unless prior
written approval has been obtained from the County Liaison.
I.Translation services.
J.Out-of-state meals, travel, and lodging.
K.Office supplies and equipment including phone charges, website host fees, and consultant fees.
L.Installation and labor costs related to equipment purchase, service costs or plans such as extended
warranties, and replacement of existing equipment such as dishwashers, refrigerators/freezers, and
water filling stations.
M.Extended leave, defined as a formal leave of absence for a special circumstance (e.g., childbirth,
caring for an ill family member, health condition, military leave) approved by the city, for voluntary
or mandatory (e.g., performance) reasons.
VII.Reporting and Reimbursement
Required Activities:
A.By July 15, 2026, municipality shall submit a mid-year report and reimbursement request form for
the first six months of 2025, on forms provided by the County Liaison.
B.By January 15, 2027, municipality shall submit a final report and reimbursement request form for
the last six months of 2026, on forms provided by the County Liaison.
Page 67 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 1 - Page 14 of 14
C.Mid-year and final reports shall include time spent on each category, and for each city if applicable,
for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working directly on the planning,
implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities during the reimbursement period.
D.Report and reimbursement request forms must be signed by the Authorized Representative (i.e.,
contract signatory) for the grant agreement, or by other designee who is independent of
municipality personnel who work directly on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting
of eligible activities.
E.Reimbursement requests must be for eligible expenses, less revenues or other monies received,
incurred in connection with the performance of grant activities.
F.Reimbursement requests must be supported by documentation that includes expense dates,
vendors, items purchased, and amounts – such as vendor invoices, receipts, or detailed financial
reports produced using municipal accounting software – itemizing all expenses related to the grant,
including salary and benefits, with photos of purchased containers and placement, in-person
education events with tables, and special collections for recycling, organics, or reuse. Any
reimbursement request for multiple municipalities must separately itemize the request for
reimbursement for each individual municipality.
G.Salary and benefits cannot exceed the total amount budgeted for salary and benefits in the
Application unless reasonable justification is provided and approved by County Liaison in advance.
H.Activities outlined in the Application and contained in the Grant Agreement represent municipality’s
obligations, and it is the county’s expectation that the Grant Agreement will be fully implemented.
Municipality must contact County Liaison to make workable adjustments as needed during the
contract period and proactively address any implementation challenges as they arise.
I.Changes to Application activities and related expenses require prior approval from the County
Liaison, as described in the Grant Agreement.
Page 68 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 1 of 19
Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program
2026 Application
Municipality Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, Lilydale
Application Deadline October 1, 2025
Funding Period January 1, 2026 - December 31, 2026
Report and Reimbursement
Request Due Dates
July 15, 2026 for January- June 2026
January 15, 2027 for July- December 2026
Authorized Representative (Contract Signatory)
Name: Cheryl Jacobson City and Title: Mendota Heights City
Administrator
E-mail:cjacobson@mendotaheightsmn
.gov Phone: 651-255-1153
Mailing Address: 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Municipality Primary Contact
Designated Liaison: Courtney Selstad City and Title: MH Recycling Coordinator
E-mail: cselstad@mendotaheightsmn.g
ov Phone: 651-255-1347
Municipality Secondary Contact
Mendota Heights Designated
Back-up: Meredith Lawrence City and Title:
MH Parks & Recreation
Director/Assistant Public Works
Director
E-mail: mlawrence@mendotaheightsm
n.gov Phone: 651-255-1354
West St. Paul Designated Back-
up: Eric Weiss City and Title: WSP Parks, Recreation and
Environment Director
E-mail:eweiss@wspmn.gov Phone: 651-552-4138
South St. Paul Designated Back-
up: Monika Miller City and Title: SSP Associate Planner
E-mail:mmann@southstpaul.org Phone: 651-554-3273
Sunfish Lake Designated Back-
up: Christy Wilcox City and Title: SFL City Clerk
E-mail:cwilcoxclerk@gmail.com Phone: 612-718-4282
Lilydale Designated Back-up: Mary Tollefson City and Title: LD City Administrator
E-mail: cityoflilydale@comcast.net Phone: 651-457-2316
Municipality Communications Contact
Name: Kelly Torkelson City and Title: Mendota Heights Asst. City
Administrator
E-mail:ktorkelson@mendotaheightsm
n.gov Phone: 651-255-1356
Name: Sarah Haugen City and Title: West St. Paul Communications
Coordinator
E-mail:shaugen@wspmn.gov Phone: 651-552-4139
Name: Jacob Steiner City and Title: South St. Paul Communications
Coordinator
E-mail:jsteiner@southstpaul.org Phone: 651-554-3272
Name: Christy Wilcox City and Title: Sunfish Lake City Clerk
Page 69 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhihit 2 - Paae 2 of 19
Budget Summary Funding Eligibility Funding Request
Part 1: Base Funding Request (Required)
1.
2.
$30,964.30
$16,149.00
1.Grant Administration $72,031.40 3. $5,424.00
2.Residential Communications 4. $19,491.69
3.Municipal Facilities
4.Special Collections $72,028.99
Part 2: Supplemental Funding Request (Optional) s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
$12,398.22
$10,664
$7,130.00
$5,131.00
$5,753.58
$41,076.80
5.Multiunit Recycling
6.Reduce/Reuse Activities
7.In-Person Education $41,074.39
8.Event Recycling
9.Gap Funding
10.Organics Planning $3,561.90 $3,561.90
Total Eligible and Total Requested $116,667.69 $116,667.69
Total Match/In-Kind (25%) $30,913.00
Combined Total (Request+ Match) $147,580.69
E-mail: cwilcoxclerk@gmail.com Phone: 612-718-4282
Name: Mary Tollefson City and Title: Lilydale City Administrator
E-mail:cityoflilydale@comcast.net Phone: 651-457-2316
Application Reviewers
Communications - Name:
Kelly Torkelson
City and Title:
Mendota Heights Asst. City
Administrator
Sarah Haugen West St. Paul Communications
Coordinator
Jacob Steiner South St. Paul Communications
Coordinator
Christy Wilcox Sunfish Lake City Clerk
Mary Tollefson Lilydale City Administrator
Municipal Facilities - Name:
John Boland
City and Title:
Mendota Heights Public Works
Superintendent
Mike Tague West St. Paul Public Works
Superintendent - Parks
Melissa Blair South St. Paul Assistant to Public
Works Director
Christy Wilcox Sunfish Lake City Clerk
Mary Tollefson Lilydale City Administrator
Event Recycling - Name:
Meredith Lawrence
City and Title:
Mendota Heights Parks and
Recreation Director/Assistant
Public Works Director
Sam Murphy West St. Paul Recreation &
Engagement Manager
Deb Griffith South St. Paul Community Affairs
Liaison
Jim Nayes Sunfish Lake Forester
Other - Name: Katie Bengtson City and Title: Mendota Heights
Communications Coordinator
Page 70 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 3 of 19
I.Grant Application Instructions
A.Conduct a planning process with communications, facilities, and event recycling staff and others who
will be responsible for coordination and implementation, to collectively determine that activities
included in the Application and Application Budget are feasible, realistic, and achievable.
B.Complete the Application and the Application Budget, excluding areas for reporting.
C.Include primary contact, secondary contact, and application reviewers for each municipality
participating in the grant agreement.
D.Use whole numbers for staff ho.urs included in Application Budget.
E.If multiple municipalities submit one Application, the Application Budget must itemize descriptions,
costs, and funding requests for each municipality. Insert additional rows as needed.
F.Submit Application and App lication Budget by October 1, 2025 to County Liaison for review. Email to:
gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us.
G.Finalize Application with County Liaison and collect signature of authorized representative.
H.Submit signed Application to County Liaison for approval. Email to: gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us.
I.Obtain Grant Agreement from Dakota County.
J.Execute Grant Agreement.
II.Application Approval
Application for January 1, 2026- December 31, 2026
Due: October 1, 2025
Authorized Signature (Contract Signatory page 1):
I, the undersigned, certify that this app lication and accompanying budget was prepared under my direction or
supervision, and that the information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Authorized Representative (Contract Signatory) I Cheryl Jacobson
Title
City
Signaturtle_!_e tronic signature acceptable)
Date
Additional signatures for application approval:
Authorized Representative
Title
City
Signature {electronic signature acceptable}
Date
Page 71 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 4 of 19
Authorized Representative
Title
City
Signature (electronic signature acceptable)
Date
Authorized Representative
Title
City
Signature (electronic signature acceptable)
Date
Ill. Reports and Reimbursement Requests
A.See instructions in Guidelines Section VII: Reporting and Reimbursement.
B.Fill in actual expenses on the 2026 Community Waste Abatement Grant program Application Budget.
C.Collect authorized signature below and submit with completed Application Budget.
Report for January 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026
Due: July 15, 2026
Authorized Signature (Contract Signatory page 1):
I, the undersigned, certify that this report and accompanying budget was prepared under my direction or
supervision, and that the information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Authorized Representative (Contract Signatory)
Title
Signature (electronic signature acceptable)
Date
Total Reimbursement Request
Report for July 1, 2026 - December 31, 2026
Due: January 15, 2027
Authorized Signature (Contract Signatory page 1):
I, the undersigned, certify that this report and accompanying budget was prepared under my direction or
supervision, and that the information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Authorized Representative (Contract Signatory)
Title
Signature (electronic signature acceptable)
Date
Total Reimbursement Request
Page 72 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 5 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
1
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
Part 1: Base Funding Request (Required)
1. Grant Administration
A.Fulfill responsibilities necessary for effective grant administration and
demonstrate performance of waste abatement programs.
Staff time for grant administration Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 265 $ 15,105.00 $ - $ 15,105.00 $ - $ 15,105.00
Mileage for personal car travel
between cities for grant related
meetings and events, and to the
Western Service Center for grant
meetings and the pickup of grant
materials;
SSP: $0.70/mile x 34=$23.80
MH: $0.70/mile x 45 =31.50
0 $ - $ 23.80 $ 23.80 $ - $ 23.80
0 $ - $ 31.50 $ 31.50 $ - $ 31.50
B.Ensure named Municipality Primary Contact is properly trained to fulfill grant
responsibilities by attending the Dakota County Recycling Ambassador course. Complete Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
C.Participate in solid waste management training to support effective
implementation of grant activities, including at minimum:
1.Annual RAM/SWANA conference
SSP: RAM/SWANA Conference
registration
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 550.00 $ 550.00 $ - $ 550.00
Staff time for Conference Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 14 $ 798.00 $ - $ 798.00 $ - $ 798.00
2.Association of Recycling Managers (ARM) meetings
WSP: ARM annual membership fee
(includes workshop)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ - $ 35.00
Staff time for meetings Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
3.Annual ARM workshop
No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Staff time for Workshop Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 9 $ 513.00 $ - $ 513.00 $ - $ 513.00
D.Ensure Municipality Primary Contact attends the six Program meetings hosted
by Dakota County.Staff time for meetings Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 15 $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00
E.Refer businesses, schools, multiunit properties, and other organizations to
county Program Managers to coordinate all requests for resources (e.g., education,
containers, labels).
No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
F.Provide reasonable support to implement the Solid Waste Management Plan,
including but not limited to:$ - $ - $ -
1.Share city license list of any vape/tobacco stores with County Liaison for
purposes of county education on proper used vape/battery management. Staff time for activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
2.Update local codes as appropriate to be consistent with and no less
restrictive than County Ordinance 110.No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
G.Demonstrate Program compliance and waste abatement metrics in mid-year
and final reports that include information for all Base and Supplemental funded
projects, as described in Reporting and Reimbursement below.
Staff time for reporting Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
H.Submit reimbursement requests by county deadlines with substantiating
documentation, as described in Reporting and Reimbursement below.Staff time for reimbursement prep Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 160 $ 9,120.00 $ - $ 9,120.00 $ - $ 9,120.00
I.Optional: Participate in the annual RAM compost bin sale. Mendota Heights will continue to
participate as a distribution partner
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 5 $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00
TOTAL - - 532 $ 30,324.00 $ 640.30 $ 30,964.30 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,964.30
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 170 $ 9,690.00 $ - $ 9,690.00
SSP itemized hours TOTAL - - 166 $ 9,462.00 $ - $ 9,462.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 157 $ 8,949.00 $ - $ 8,949.00
SFL Itemized hours TOTAL - - 19 $ 1,083.00 $ - $ 1,083.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
Page 73 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 6 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
2
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
WSP Matching Funds Supervisory time; collecting
information on vape/tobacco stores
Eric Weiss, Parks,
Recreation and
Environment Director;
$69/hour
50 $ 3,450.00
SSP Matching Funds Supervisory time; collecting
information on vape/tobacco stores
Monika Miller, Associate
Planner; $51/hour 50 $ 2,550.00
MH Matching Funds
Supervisory time
Meredith Lawrence, Parks
and Recration
Director/Assistant Public
Works Director; $66/hour
40 $ 2,640.00
Public Works staff time prepping the
rain barrel and compost bin
distribution event
Tom Weiss, Parks Lead
Maintenance Worker;
$45/hour
8 $ 360.00
SFL Matching Funds Supervisory time Christy Wilcox, City Clerk;
$50/hour 5 $ 250.00
LD Matching Funds Supervisory time Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator; $64/hour 5 $ 320.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 158 $ 9,570.00
2. Residential Communications
A.Mail county-developed articles on each of the following themes to all
residential households, with a half page minimum per topic:
WSP article mailings: $700 for 1 full-
color page which includes
communications staff time, printing
and postage x2 full pages per year
(distribution to all 9,726 households)
Sarah Haugen,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ - $ 1,400.00
SSP article mailings: $700 for 1 full-
color page which includes
communications staff time, printing
and postage x2 full pages per year
(distribution to all 8,456 households)
Jacob Steiner,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ - $ 1,400.00
MH article mailings: $800 for 1 full-
color page which includes
communications staff time, printing
and postage x2 full pages per year
(distribution to all 4,822 households)
Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 1,600.00
SFL article mailings: $350 for ½ page x
4/year, including staff time, printing
and postage (distribution to all 188
households)
Christy Wilcox, City Clerk 0 $ - $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ - $ 1,400.00
LD article mailings: $350 for ½ page x
4/year, including staff time, printing
and postage (distribution to all 567
households)
Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator 0 $ - $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ - $ 1,400.00
Staff time coordinating and tracking
print articles
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
1.Home recycling Included above
2.Household hazardous waste management (The Recycling Zone) Included above
3.Food scraps reduction or management Included above
4.Reduce/reuse opportunities Included above
Page 74 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 7 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
3
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
B.Post at least one county-developed waste abatement social media message per
month using county-provided messaging (e.g., county messaging toolkit, share
county media posts).
Included in Matching Funds
WSP: Sarah Haugen,
Communications
Coordinator
SSP: Jacob Steiner,
Communications
Coordinator
MH: Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Staff time coordinating and tracking
social media
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
C.Request county approval of any proposed modifications to county-developed
articles or social media posts at least two weeks before the municipal deadline for
printing or publishing.
No additional cost
WSP: Sarah Haugen,
Communications
Coordinator
SSP: Jacob Steiner,
Communications
Coordinator
MH: Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
D.Stock brochure racks at city-owned/operated facilities with county-provided
waste abatement print materials (i.e., What Goes Where guides, Fix-It-Clinic flyers,
etc.).
Staff time for activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
E.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents
including use county translated waste abatement messaging/materials as
appropriate.
Spanish speaking staff in WSP are
available to help me provide
information over the phone as
necessary at no additional cost.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
F.Maintain waste management information on the municipal website following
county guidance in coordination with the County Liaison, keeping information and
links current.
Included in Matching Funds
WSP: Sarah Haugen,
Communications
Coordinator
SSP: Jacob Steiner,
Communications
Coordinator
MH: Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Staff time coordinating website
updates/changes
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
G.Serve as a resource to residents on waste abatement-related inquiries (e.g.,
email, phone).
Staff time communicating with
residents
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 97 $ 5,529.00 $ - $ 5,529.00 $ - $ 5,529.00
H.Provide funding source credit on all print materials, written as: Partially funded
by Dakota County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL - - 157 $ 8,949.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 16,149.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 16,149.00
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 50 $ 2,850.00 $ - $ 2,850.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 50 $ 2,850.00 $ - $ 2,850.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 45 $ 2,565.00 $ - $ 2,565.00
SFL Itemized hours TOTAL - - 6 $ 342.00 $ - $ 342.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 6 $ 342.00 $ - $ 342.00
WSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting county recycling
messaging on social media and
maintaining grant-related information
on city website.
Sarah Haugen,
Communications
Coordinator; $45/hour
30 $ 1,350.00
Page 75 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 8 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
4
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting county recycling
messaging on social media and
maintaining grant-related information
on city website.
Jacob Steiner,
Communications
Coordinator; $40/hour
30 $ 1,200.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time posting county recycling
messaging on social media and
maintaining grant-related information
on city website.
Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator; $47/hour
25 $ 1,175.00
SFL Matching Funds Staff time maintaining grant-related
information on city website.
Christy Wilcox, City Clerk;
$50/hour 9 $ 450.00
LD Matching Funds Staff time maintaining grant-related
information on city website.
Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator; $64/hour 8 $ 512.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 102 $ 4,687.00
3. Municipal Facilities
A.Provide verification of best waste management practices and recycling
compliance at least once annually, by visually inspecting and reporting status using
the Municipal Facilities Recycling Tool.
Staff time performing verifications Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 83 $ 4,731.00 $ - $ 4,731.00 $ - $ 4,731.00
B.Provide county-required recycling educational messaging to each municipal
employee, volunteer, tenant, and custodial/housekeeping staff who generates and
sorts trash and recycling, within 30 days of hire and at least annually thereafter.
Staff time to provide required
messaging electronically to all parties
listed in the requirements with the
exception of janitorial staff in WSP and
SSP who receive printed messaging of
county-produced "Recycling for
Persons Emptying Containers" in
English and Spanish
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 5 $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00
C.Conduct in-person training on recycling requirements for municipalities with
city personnel who are responsible for (a) recycling container placement and
monitoring on city-owned/operated property, (b) emptying trash, recycling, and
organics containers on city-owned/operated property, (c) handling event permits or
facility rental applications, and (d) staffing events subject to city recycling
requirements.
WSP Lunch n Learn pizza and lemonade
for staff (focusing on staff in catagories
a and b)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 139.00 $ 139.00 $ - $ 139.00
SSP Lunch n Learn pizza and lemonade
for staff (focusing on staff in catagories
a and b)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 139.00 $ 139.00 $ - $ 139.00
MH Lunch n Learn pizza and lemonade
for staff (focusing on staff in catagories
a and b)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 130.00 $ 130.00 $ - $ 130.00
D.Optional: Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to
educate municipal leaders and employees about the local recycling and waste
management system.
NA $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL - - 88 $ 5,016.00 $ 408.00 $ 5,424.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,424.00
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 30 $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 30 $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 27 $ 1,539.00 $ - $ 1,539.00
SFL Itemized hours TOTAL - - 0 $ - $ - $ -
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 1 $ 57.00 $ - $ 57.00
WSP Matching Funds Staff time assisting with verifications.
Mike Tague, Public Works
Superintendent - Parks;
$52/hour
12 $ 624.00
SSP Matching Funds Staff time assisting with verifications.
Melissa Blair, Assistant to
Public Works Director;
$46/hour
10 $ 460.00
MH Matching Funds Staff time assisting with verifications.
Tom Weiss, Parks Lead
Maintenance Worker;
$45/hour
10 $ 450.00
LD Matching Funds Staff time assisting with verifications. Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator; $64/hour 1 $ 64.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 33 $ 1,598.00
Page 76 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 9 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
5
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
4. Special Collections
A.Implement collections of all of the following materials that are challenging for
residents to recycle or compost, using the method specified, with an independent
collection for each city having 1,000 households or more and a co-collection for
each city having fewer than 1,000 households (i.e., in collaboration with an
adjacent city):
1.Holiday lights: free collection for recycling during and after winter
holidays
Mileage for collection and delivery to
Recycling Zone
SFL: $0.70/mile x 44 = $30.80
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 30.80 $ 30.80 $ - $ 30.80
Staff time on holiday lights collection Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 24 $ 1,368.00 $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00
2.Mattresses and box springs: drop off discount for recycling and
reuse, curbside pickup discount for recycling and reuse, or one-day
collection, with reuse required for materials in good condition
WSP Mattress Collection event with
Second Chance Recycling in May 2026.
160 mattresses x $27/mattress + $375
event fee
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 4,695.00 $ 4,695.00 $ - $ 4,695.00
SSP mattress collection event with
Second Chance Recycling in October
2026. 150 mattresses x $27/mattress +
$375 event fee
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 4,425.00 $ 4,425.00 $ - $ 4,425.00
MH Mattress collection event with
Second Chance Recycling in September
2026. 70 mattresses x $27/mattress +
$375 event fee
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 2,265.00 $ 2,265.00 $ - $ 2,265.00
SFL residents can participate in WSP
mattress collection event. 3 mattresses
x $27/mattress
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 81.00 $ 81.00 $ - $ 81.00
LD residents can participate in MH
mattress collection event. 3 mattresses
x $27/mattress
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 81.00 $ 81.00 $ - $ 81.00
20 first-come first-served, curbside
pickup options available for residents in
any of the 5 cities, that are unable to
transport their mattress to an event.
Pickups performed by Second Chance
Recycling.
20 mattress pickups x $27/each (an
additional 5 pickups are included in MH
Gap Funding)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 540.00 $ 540.00 $ - $ 540.00
Staff time coordinating mattress
collections
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 30 $ 1,710.00 $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00
3.Paper: free collection for shredding and recycling confidential
documents
WSP paper shred event with Pioneer
Secure Shred in April; 2 trucks for 3
hour event=$2,000
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00
SSP paper shred event hosted with the
Wakota Federal Credit Union with
Shred-It in September; 1 truck for 3
hours =$1800/2
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ - $ 900.00
MH paper shred event with Pioneer
Secure Shred in October; 2 trucks for 3
hour event=$2,000
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00
SFL and LD can participate in these
collections at no cost to their grant
budgets.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Staff time coordinating paper shred
events
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 29 $ 1,653.00 $ 1,653.00 $ - $ 1,653.00
Page 77 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 10 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
6
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
4.Pumpkins: free collection for composting after Halloween
WSP pumpkin collection with Highland
Sanitation; 20yd rolloff for 2 days=$376
+ $80/ton disposal (est. 2.8 tons)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ 600.00
SSP pumpkin collection with Aspen
Waste; 20yd rolloff for 2 days=$376 +
$80/ton disposal (est. 2.8 tons)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ 600.00
MH pumpkin collection with Aspen
Waste included in Gap Funding section
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
SFL and LD residents can participate in
any of these collections at no cost.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Staff time coordinating pumpkin
collections
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
5.Scrap metal: free or partly-subsidized collection for recycling if city
hosts a cleanup day
SSP staff time organizing Clean Up Day;
$46/hour x 8 hours Melissa Blair, SSP Assistant
to the Public Works
Director; $46/hour
0 $ - $ 368.00 $ 368.00 $ - $ 368.00
40yd scrap metal rolloff net cost billed
with scrap metal value deducted 0 $ - $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ - $ 200.00
B.Implement a free collection of yard signs for recycling after fall elections, as a
single-city or multi-city event (i.e., in collaboration with one or more adjacent
cities).
Staff time coordinating yard sign
collections to be held in Mendota
Heights, West St. Paul and South St.
Paul
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 20 $ 1,140.00 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
Mileage for collection and delivery to
Choice Plastics
LD: $0.70/mile x 60 = $42
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 42.00 $ 42.00 $ - $ 42.00
C.Promote all city-led special collections through social media, videos, e-news,
print media, or other outreach/media channels, specifying how materials will be
managed (i.e., recycling, reuse, or both).
WSP: Social media boosts for Special
Collections events; cost for
approximately 9,300 impressions on
Meta platforms
Sarah Haugen, WSP
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ 186.00 $ 186.00 $ - $ 186.00
City will post events to social media,
city web calendars and print
promotional flyers for community
spaces; No additional cost
Jacob Steiner, SSP
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
City will post events to social media,
city web calendars and print
promotional flyers for community
spaces; No additional cost
Katie Bengtson, MH
Communications
Coordinator
0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
D.Request and report weights, cubic yards, or number of units for each material
collected, as specified on the county reporting tool.Staff time reporting Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
E.Coordinate timing of special collections with County Liaison to prevent
duplication of effort, timing overlap, conflicting messages, pricing conflicts, and
confusion for residents.
No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Anticipated Revenue
Residents of Mendota will be invited to
participate in the shredded paper,
mattress, and pumpkin collections
above, City of Mendota grant funds in
the amounts to the right will be used
towards collection costs.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (140.11) $ (140.11) $ - $ (140.11)
WSP mattress revenue (160 mattresses
x $15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (2,400.00) $ (2,400.00) $ - $ (2,400.00)
SSP mattress revenue (150 mattresses
x $15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (2,250.00) $ (2,250.00) $ - $ (2,250.00)
MH mattress revenue (70 mattresses x
$15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (1,050.00) $ (1,050.00) $ - $ (1,050.00)
Page 78 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 11 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
7
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
SFL mattress revenue (3 mattresses x
$15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (45.00) $ (45.00) $ - $ (45.00)
LD mattress revenue (3 mattresses x
$15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (45.00) $ (45.00) $ - $ (45.00)
Mattress curbside pickup option
income (25 pickups x $15)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator - - $ (375.00) $ (375.00) $ - $ (375.00)
TOTAL - - 119 $ 6,783.00 $ 12,708.69 $ 19,491.69 $ - $ - $ - $ 19,491.69
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 44 $ 2,508.00 $ - $ 2,508.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 36 $ 2,052.00 $ - $ 2,052.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 25 $ 1,425.00 $ - $ 1,425.00
SFL Itemized hours TOTAL - - 5 $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 9 $ 513.00 $ - $ 513.00
WSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting collection events on
social media and the website
Sarah Haugen, WSP
Communications
Coordinator; $45/hour
20 $ 900.00
Staff time prepping collection event
venues
Mike Tague, WSP PW
Superintendent - Parks;
$52/hour
15 $ 780.00
Staff time recruiting volunteers for
collection events
Diane Erickson, WSP
Volunteer Coordinator;
$41/hour
10 $ 410.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting collection events on
social media and the website
Jacob Steiner, SSP
Communications
Coordinator; $40/hour
15 $ 600.00
Additional Public Works staff time
prepping and working Clean-Up Day Various SSP Public Works
staff; $50/hour
8 $ 400.00
Staff time recruiting volunteers for
collection events
Deb Griffith SSP
Community Affairs Liaison;
$47/hour
15 $ 705.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time posting collection events on
social media and the website
Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator; $47/hour
15 $ 705.00
Staff time prepping collection event
venues
Tom Weiss, Parks Lead
Maintenance Worker;
$45/hour
10 $ 450.00
SFL Matching Funds Staff time helping to promote
collection events
Christy Wilcox, City Clerk;
$50/hour 3 $ 150.00
LD Matching Funds Staff time helping to promote
collection events
Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator; $64/hour 3 $ 192.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 114 $ 5,292.00
PART 1 SUBTOTAL - - 896 $ 51,072.00 $ 20,956.99 $ 72,028.99 $ - $ - $ - $ 72,028.99
Part 2: Supplemental Funding Request (Optional)
5. Multiunit Recycling
A.Provide technical assistance for participants in the Dakota County Multiunit
Recycling Program by:
1.Conducting broad-based outreach through multiple communication channels
Staff time reaching out by email to all
past participants; Staff time creating
social media outreach (to be approved
by Dakota County)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
Page 79 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 12 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
8
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
2.Reaching out to an agreed-upon number of potential new participants
and past participants in coordination with the County Liaison
Staff time reaching out to 8 property
managers (3 in WSP, 3 in SSP, 1 in MH,
1 in LD) with info on recycling resources
as well as asking for advice on local
property management channels.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 16 $ 912.00 $ - $ 912.00 $ - $ 912.00
3.Responding to requests for assistance
Staff time fielding requests for
assistance, explaining the various
recycling resources to potential
participants, answering general best
practices questions, and follow-up
communications
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
4.Completing needs assessments, applications, and data-collection
mechanisms Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 50 $ 2,850.00 $ - $ 2,850.00 $ - $ 2,850.00
5.Implementing infrastructure and education plans
Staff time following through with
participant property needs, such as
gathering requested resources, setting
up containers, door-to-door education
and/or presentations as requested.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 30 $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00
6.Advancing site-specific solutions for increased waste diversion, waste
reduction, and reuse
Staff time responding to site-specific
needs including servicing the HHW pilot
project bins at least through Q2 2026
to get a full year of data
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 30 $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00 $ - $ 1,710.00
B.Maintain an annually updated list of addresses and contacts for multiunit
properties that are eligible for the Program, and share with Dakota County.Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
C.Provide an annual mailing about Program resources to multiunit property
managers and/or owners in coordination with County Liaison.
WSP multiunit annual mailing to 20
HOAs and 144 rental properties. $0.25
color copies x3/property, $0.78
postage/property = $1.53/property.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 250.92 $ 250.92 $ - $ 250.92
SSP multiunit annual mailing to 11
HOAs and 72 rental properties. $0.25
color copies x3/property, $0.78
postage/property = $1.53/property
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 126.99 $ 126.99 $ - $ 126.99
MH multiunit annual mailing to 18
HOAs and 8 rental properties. $0.25
color copies x3/property, $0.78
postage/property = $1.53/property
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 39.78 $ 39.78 $ - $ 39.78
LD multiunit annual mailing to 7 HOAs
and 3 rental properties. $0.25 color
copies x3/property, $0.78
postage/property = $1.53/property
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 10.53 $ 10.53 $ - $ 10.53
Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
D.Optional: Coordinate with the County Liaison to revise multiunit recycling
mechanisms (e.g., business license renewals, rental license renewals, rental
inspections, fire inspections, and property manager meetings) and municipal
planning and construction procedures to support recycling in new or remodeled
buildings (e.g., recycling chutes, adequate space), consistent with city recycling
codes and county ordinances.
NA $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL - - 210 $ 11,970.00 $ 428.22 $ 12,398.22 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,398.22
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 80 $ 4,560.00 $ - $ 4,560.00
Page 80 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 13 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
9
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 80 $ 4,560.00 $ - $ 4,560.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
WSP Matching Funds
Staff time referring properties to the
Multiunit Grant
Zach Ludwig, WSP Housing
and Code Inspector;
$48/hour
20 $ 960.00
Staff time including Multiunit Grant
information in rental license packets
Bryan Byrd, WSP Admin
Specialist; $42/hour 12 $ 504.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time referring properties to the
Multiunit Grant and identifying new
properties
Deb Griffith, SSP
Community Affairs Liaison;
$47/hour
15 $ 705.00
Mike Lindamood, SSP Code
Enforcement Officer;
$39/hour
15 $ 585.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time referring properties to the
Multiunit Grant and identifying new
properties
Sarah Madden, MH
Community Development
Manager; $61/hour
8 $ 488.00
LD Matching Funds Staff time referring properties to the
Multiunit Grant
Mary Tollefson, City
Administrator; $64/hour 3 $ 192.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 73 $ 3,434.00
6. Reduce/Reuse Activities
A.Host a free drop box for donations of reusable athletic equipment if there are
no permanent physical locations to reuse (e.g. donate, buy, sell, exchange) within
the city.
Staff time coordinating collections to
be held for 2 weeks at MH City Hall,
WSP Sports Dome and SSP Woog Arena
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
B.Promote existing reuse opportunities for athletic equipment, furniture, and
building materials (e.g., curbside pickup, drop-off, online exchange, other), through
two or more of the following: social media, videos, e-news, print media, or other
outreach/media channels.
Staff time developing a video (to be
approved by, and in consultation with,
Dakota County) on reuse opportunities
for furniture and building materials,
intended for web/social media
platforms and to play at tabling events
where appropriate.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 24 $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00
Staff time developing a postcard (to be
approved by, and in consultation with,
Dakota County) on reuse opportunities
for furniture and building materials to
each resident
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
WSP: Fee for print house to mail
postcard to every household in WSP.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 1,600.00
SSP: Fee for print house to mail
postcard to every household in SSP
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 1,600.00
C.Promote city-led reuse opportunities for optional materials in (H) through at
least one outreach/media channel.
Staff time getting Building Materials
Collection into the city newsletters and
including it on WSP/SSP reuse postcard
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 4 $ 228.00 $ - $ 228.00 $ - $ 228.00
D.Obtain and report weights for each material collected, donated, or exchanged,
as specified on the county reporting tool.Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
Page 81 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 14 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
10
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
E.Ensure that usable leftover items are donated or reused after the event, to the
extent possible. No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
F.Track and report number of people participating in all staffed reuse activities
by monitoring participation using a sign-in sheet or clicker. No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
G.Provide updates to the online Dakota County Reduce & Reuse Map. Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
H. Optional: Implement free or low-cost reuse opportunities (e.g., swap event,
collection for donation, curbside pickup discount, drop box) for materials that are
challenging for residents to reuse, along with an interactive educational activity for
in-person events (i.e., as described in 7A), using the best method of reuse based on
data available. Preference must be given to materials and methods that meet all of
the following criteria, with priority given to building materials and furniture, and a
limit of one activity per city for materials that do not meet these criteria:
1.Significant diversion – at least 0.5 ton per event or activity
2.Fills a gap – no permanent physical location to reuse (e.g., donate, buy, sell,
exchange) within the city
3.Convenient and accessible – including consideration for transportation and
physical barriers
4.Confirmed reuse outlet and end use
5.Does not duplicate, interfere, or compete with private sector services
SSP: Building Materials Collection, Q2
2026, with Better Futures. This fee
includes transportation of materials, 3
Better Futures staff for unloading at
the collection, and an inventory of
materials collected, along with weights,
provided after the event.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 1,350.00 $ 1,350.00 $ - $ 1,350.00
Social media boosts for Building
Materials Collection; cost for
approximately 8,200 impressions on
Meta platforms
WSP: $110
SSP: $50
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 110.00 $ 110.00 $ - $ 110.00
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ - $ 50.00
Staff time on Building Materials
Collection
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
MH Art & Crafts Supply Swap, Q1 2026,
leftovers going to CRAFT Thrift and the
MN Textile Center
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
I.Optional: Attend Reuse Minnesota meetings.
SSP: ReuseMN Individual Membership Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ - $ 50.00
SSP: ReuseMN Conference Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ - $ 90.00
Staff time at ReuseMN meetings and
Conference
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
J.Optional: Attend Responsible Public Purchasing Council meetings. NA $ - $ - $ -
K.Optional: Switch to reusable dishware (e.g., washable dishes and silverware) at
permanent city-owned facilities. NA $ - $ - $ -
L.Optional: Provide and collect reusable dishware (e.g., washable baskets, cups)
at community events on city property with at least 300 attendees to reduce single-
use products use.
NA $ - $ - $ -
M.Optional: Provide assistance at Dakota County Fix-It Clinics held in the city, if
applicable. NA $ - $ - $ -
N.Optional: Host residential reduce, reuse, or repair education classes using
county messaging, ensuring all hired educators are approved in advance by the
County Liaison, and reporting on outcomes by monitoring presentation attendance
(e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar attendance (e.g., number of
people who log on), table interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game
interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet).
NA $ - $ - $ -
O.Optional: Facilitate changes to municipality policies to increase reuse
opportunities in the community (e.g., clothing drop box prohibitions, rental
companies, and secondhand stores) or internal operations (e.g., office supplies,
equipment).
NA $ - $ - $ -
P.Optional: Other as approved by County Liaison (e.g., repair event or coupon).NA $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL - 102 $ 5,814.00 $ 4,850.00 $ 10,664.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,664.00
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 35 $ 1,995.00 $ - $ 1,995.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 20 $ 1,140.00 $ - $ 1,140.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 7 $ 399.00 $ - $ 399.00
Page 82 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 15 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
11
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
WSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting reuse events on
social media and the website
Sarah Haugen, WSP
Communications
Coordinator; $45/hour
10 $ 450.00
Staff time reviewing postcard design
process
Sarah Haugen, WSP
Communications
Coordinator; $45/hour
5 $ 225.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time posting reuse events on
social media and the website
Jacob Steiner, SSP
Communications
Coordinator; $40/hour
8 $ 320.00
Staff time prepping and working
Building Materials Collection
Monika Miller, Associate
Planner; $51/hour 16 $ 816.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time posting reuse events on
social media and the website Katie Bengtson,
Communications
Coordinator; $47/hour
10 $ 470.00
Staff time assisting with production of
video on the reuse options for furniture
and building materials
10 $ 470.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 59 $ 2,751.00
7. In-Person Education
A.Provide resident waste abatement education at events or gatherings, in person
or online, to educate at least 1% of the municipality’s population through
interactive activities between city staff and residents (e.g., ed kits, games,
conversations, teaching, presentations), on all four of the following topics, with a
focus on one or two topics per event; does not include display views or brochure
distribution:
WSP: Staff time at the following in-
person events:
Table at Explore West St. Paul Days in
June (150 people educated);
Recycling Relay activity at WSP/MH
Safety Camp Tykes in July (45 people
educated);
Table at COPS in the Park in August
(100 people educated);
other community events as requested
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
SSP: Staff time at the following in-
person events:
Table at Environmental Expo in April
(75 people educated);
Table at Kaposia Days in June (150
people educated);
Table at Farmer's Market Community
Booth in Fall (30 people educated);
other community events as requested.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
SSP: $40 booth fee for Kaposia Days Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ - $ 40.00
Page 83 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 16 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
12
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
MH: Staff time at the following in-
person events:
Table at Fishing Derby in July (60
people educated);
Recycling Relay activity at WSP/MH
Safety Camp in August (45 people
educated);
Table at Trick-or-Teeing in October (150
people educated);
other community events as requested
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 35 $ 1,995.00 $ - $ 1,995.00 $ - $ 1,995.00
SFL: Staff time tabling at Arbor Day
event in May (20 people educated)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 5 $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00
1.Home recycling To be assigned to one of the events
listed above in each city
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
2.Residential food scraps drop site(s)To be assigned to one of the events
listed above in each city
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
3.The Recycling Zone services To be assigned to one of the events
listed above in each city
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
4.Local reduce/reuse opportunities (e.g., repair) To be assigned to one of the events
listed above in each city
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
B.Promote city-led education opportunities in (A) through at least one
outreach/media channel.
City-led events listed in (A) are
promoted on social media, the website
and newsletters; No additional cost
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
C.Ensure all staff and volunteers who implement In-Person Education activities
are properly trained to fulfill responsibilities by attending the Dakota County
Recycling Ambassador course and using current county messaging.
No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
D.Ensure all professional educators who implement In-Person Education
activities are approved in advance by County Liaison.No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
E.Use county education materials, display materials, and presentation slides. No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
F.Coordinate with County Liaison for any education requests in schools,
businesses, and multiunit residences. No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
G.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents
including using county translated waste abatement messaging/materials as
appropriate.
WSP: Spanish translator to interpret at
the education table at Explore WSP
Days and COPS in the Park; $50/hour x
5.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ - $ 250.00
H.Track and report number of people educated in person by monitoring
presentation participation (e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar
participation (e.g., number of people who log on), verbal tabling activity
interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game interactions (e.g., clicker or tally
sheet).
No additional cost Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
I.Optional: Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to educate
residents about the local recycling and waste management system. NA $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL - 120 $ 6,840.00 $ 290.00 $ 7,130.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,130.00
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 40 $ 2,280.00 $ - $ 2,280.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 35 $ 1,995.00 $ - $ 1,995.00
SFL Itemized hours TOTAL - - 5 $ 285.00 $ - $ 285.00
WSP Matching Funds
Supervisory time and assistance with
coordinating recycling education events
in tandem with Parks Department
Eric Weiss, Parks,
Recreation and
Environment Director;
$69/hour
10 $ 690.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time assisting with coordinating
recycling education events in tandem
with city organizations
Deb Griffith, SSP
Community Affairs Liaison;
$47/hour
10 $ 470.00
Page 84 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 17 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
13
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
MH Matching Funds
Supervisory time and assistance with
coordinating recycling education events
in tandem with Parks Department
Meredith Lawrence, Parks
and Recration
Director/Assistant Public
Works Director; $66/hour
10 $ 660.00
SFL Matching Funds Staff time assisting with Arbor Day
preparations
Christy Wilcox, City Clerk;
$50/hour 2 $ 100.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 32 $ 1,920.00
8. Event Recycling
A. Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection,
or both, at events, tournaments, and festivals held on city-owned property:
1. Contact and assist city event coordinators to plan and implement recycling
collection.
2. Provide an appropriate number of co-located recycling and trash containers in
strategic locations to prevent overflow, along with proper bags and signage.
3. Provide required county waste abatement messaging to educate vendors,
volunteers, and custodial staff about event recycling requirements.
Staff time on this activity Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
SSP: 40 Extra recycling containers and
service for On The Road Again in
October provided by Republic
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00
B.Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection,
or both, at household parties (i.e., non-city events) upon request.
Staff time coordinating the free rental
of recycling, trash and organics xframes
for residents
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 15 $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00
C.Update two or more municipal forms (e.g., event permit, event vendor
agreement, facility rental agreement) using county model messaging to include
recycling requirements for events, tournaments, and festivals, consistent with city
codes and county ordinance.
Staff time updating
MH Field and Facility Use Policy
MH Block Party Permit Application
SSP Airport Conference Room Rental
Application
SSP Ice Arena Rental Application
WSP Athletic Facilities Rental Policy
WSP Special Event Policy
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
D.Optional: Add waste abatement infrastructure (i.e., recycling and organics
containers, lids, labels, and signage) in municipality-controlled facilities (e.g.,
buildings, parks, and roadways) where containers are needed and have not yet
been placed, (i.e., replacing containers is an ineligible expense) using the county-
developed container purchasing checklist.
WSP 2 Recycle Away 35gal recycling
bins to pair with trash bins along
Robert Street.
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 2,250.00 $ 2,250.00 $ - $ 2,250.00
TOTAL - 33 $ 1,881.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 5,131.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,131.00
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 15 $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 10 $ 570.00 $ - $ 570.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 8 $ 456.00 $ - $ 456.00
WSP Matching Funds
Staff time evalutaing and refering event
partners to the Recycling Coordinator
for waste information and resources
Eric Weiss, Parks,
Recreation and
Environment Director;
$69/hour
3 $ 207.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time evalutaing and refering event
partners to the Recycling Coordinator
for waste information and resources
Deb Griffith, SSP
Community Affairs Liaison;
$47/hour
4 $ 188.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time evalutaing and refering event
partners to the Recycling Coordinator
for waste information and resources
Meredith Lawrence, Parks
and Recration
Director/Assistant Public
Works Director; $66/hour
3 $ 198.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 10 $ 593.00
9. Organics Planning (PROPOSED)
Staff time for curbside organics
collection planning activities in
collaboration with Dakota County
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 45 $ 2,565.00 $ 2,565.00 $ - $ 2,565.00
Other expenses related to curbside
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 33.90 $ 33.90 $ - $ 33.90
Page 85 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 18 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
14
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
A.Optional: Support research and planning for residential curbside organics
collection.
organics planning activities TBD and
approved in writing by Dakota County
grant liaison:
WSP: $33.90
SSP: $14.40
MH: $39.30
SFL: $26.25
LD: $28.05
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 14.40 $ 14.40 $ - $ 14.40
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 39.30 $ 39.30 $ - $ 39.30
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 26.25 $ 26.25 $ - $ 26.25
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 28.05 $ 28.05 $ - $ 28.05
B.Optional: Support research and planning for new organics drop sites.
Staff time for SSP drop site planning
and implimentation activities in
collaboration with Dakota County
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 15 $ 855.00 $ 855.00 $ - $ 855.00
TOTAL - 60 $ 3,420.00 $ 141.90 $ 3,561.90 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,561.90
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 25 $ 1,425.00 $ - $ 1,425.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 22 $ 1,254.00 $ - $ 1,254.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 12 $ 684.00 $ - $ 684.00
LD Itemized hours TOTAL - - 1 $ 57.00 $ - $ 57.00
SSP Matching Funds
Staff time to support planning
discussions for new food scraps drop
site in SSP
Monika Miller, Associate
Planner; $51/hour 8 $ 408.00
MH Matching Funds
Staff time to support planning
discussions for future curbside organics
collection
Meredith Lawrence, Parks
and Recration
Director/Assistant Public
Works Director; $66/hour
10 $ 660.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 18 $ 1,068.00
10. Gap Funding
A.Complete, or make progress toward completing, one or more waste
abatement projects included in eligible grant categories above, for which additional
funding is needed, with first priority given to filling funding gaps in Base Funding
categories, second priority given to filling gaps in Supplemental Funding categories,
and third priority given to conducting waste abatement activities that are not
included in Base Funding or Supplemental Funding, with prior written County
WSP: Additional staff time for Grant
Administration and Special Collections
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 24 $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00
WSP: 5 plastic recycling bins
(Commercial Zone PolyTech 42 gallon
square containers) for the pool deck
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 980.00 $ 980.00 $ - $ 980.00
WSP: additional mileage for grant
administration activities; $0.70/mile x
56
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 39.20 $ 39.20 $ - $ 39.20
SSP: Additional staff time for Grant
Administration and Special Collections
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 16 $ 912.00 $ 912.00 $ - $ 912.00
MH: Additional staff time for Grant
Administration and Special Collections
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator; $57/hour 29 $ 1,653.00 $ 1,653.00 $ - $ 1,653.00
Page 86 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 2 - Page 19 of 19 2026 Application Budget - City of Mendota Heights
15
Minimum Grant Requirements (Deliverables) Description of Expense Staff Responsible (Name) Staff Time
(Hours) Staff Expense ($) Other Expense ($) Total Request ($) Jan-Jun Actual
($)
Label
#
Jul-Dec Actual
($)
Label
#
Total Spent
($)
Total Unspent
($)
Liaison approval. MH: 20yd rolloff Pumpkin Collection
with Aspen Waste; 20yd rolloff for 2
days=$376 + $80/ton disposal (est. 2.8
tons)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ 600.00
MH: 5 additional curbside mattress
pickups for a total of 25 with Second
Chance Recycling; $27/pickup
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 135.00 $ 135.00 $ - $ 135.00
MH: In-house printing for event &
collection posters ($2.50/poster x 14)
and flyers ($0.25/flyer x 123)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 65.93 $ 65.93 $ - $ 65.93
LD: Mileage for yard sign collection
($0.70/mile x 18 miles)
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator 0 $ - $ 12.60 $ 12.60 $ - $ 12.60
Anticipated revenue Income from Mendota Gap Funding to
suppliment MH pumpkin collection
Courtney Selstad, Recycling
Coordinator $ (12.15) $ (12.15) $ - $ (12.15)
TOTAL - 69 $ 3,933.00 $ 1,820.58 $ 5,753.58 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,753.58
WSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 24 $ 1,368.00 $ - $ 1,368.00
SSP Itemized hours TOTAL - - 16 $ 912.00 $ - $ 912.00
MH Itemized hours TOTAL - - 29 $ 1,653.00 $ - $ 1,653.00
Matching Funds TOTAL 0 $ -
PART 2 SUBTOTAL - - 594 $ 33,858.00 $ 10,780.70 $ 44,638.70 $ - $ - $ - $ 44,638.70
GRAND TOTAL (Part 1 + Part 2) - - 1490 $ 84,930.00 $ 31,737.69 $ 116,667.69 $ - $ - $ - $ 116,667.69
Matching Funds (Part 2 + Part 2) 599 $ 30,913.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Page 87 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 3 - Page 1 of 2 INSURANCE TERMS
Contractor agrees to provide and maintain at all times during the term of this Contract such insurance coverages as are indic ated herein and to
otherwise comply with the provisions that follow. Such policy(ies) of insurance shall apply to the extent of, but not as a limitation upon or in satisfaction of,
the Contract indemnity provisions. The provisions of this section shall also apply to all Subcontractors, Sub -subcontractors, and Independent Contractors
engaged by Contractor with respect to this Contract, and Contractor shall be entirely responsible for securing the compliance of all such persons or parties with
these provisions.
APPLICABLE SECTIONS ARE CHECKED
☒1. Workers Compensation.
Workers' Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes including an All States or Universal Endorsement where
applicable. Such policy shall include Employer's Liability coverage in an amount no less than $500,000. If Contractor is not required by Statute to
carry Workers’ Compensation Insurance, Contractor agrees: (1) to provide County with evidence documenting the specific provision under Minn.
Stat. § 176.041 which excludes Contractor from the requirement of obtaining Workers’ Compensation Insurance; (2) to provide prior notice to County
of any change in Contractor’s exemption status under Minn. Stat. § 176.041; and (3) to defend, hold harmless and indemnify County from and against
any and all claims and losses brought by Contractor or any subcontractor or other person claiming through Contractor for Workers’ Compensation
or Employers’ Liability benefits for damages arising out of any injury or illness resulting from performance of work under this Contract. If any such
change requires Contractor to obtain Workers’ Compensation Insurance, Contractor agrees to promptly provide County with evidence of such
insurancecoverage.
☒2. General Liability.
"Commercial General Liability Insurance" coverage, providing coverage on an "occurrence" basis. Policy shall include, but not be
limited to, coverage for Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability (applying to this Contract), Independent
Contractors, "XC&U" and Products-Completed Operations liability (if applicable). An Insurance Services Office "Comprehensive General
Liability" policy which includes a Broad Form Endorsement GL 0404 (Insurance Services Office designation) shall be considered to be an
acceptable equivalent policy form. Claims-made coverage is acceptable.
A total combined general liability policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate, applying to liability for Bodily Injury,
Personal Injury, and Property Damage, which total limit may be satisfied by the limit afforded under its Commercial General L iability policy, or
equivalent policy, or by such policy in combination with the limits afforded by an Umbrella or Excess Liability policy (or po licies); provided, that
the coverage afforded under any such Umbrella or Excess Liability policy is at least as broad as that afforded by the underlying Commercial General
Liability policy (or equivalent underlying policy). Coverage under such policy may be subject to a deductible, not to exceed $25,000 per occurrence.
Contractor agrees to maintain such insurance for at least one (1) year from Contract termination.
☒Such policy(ies) shall name Dakota County, its officers, employees and agents as Additional Insureds thereunder.
☐3. Professional Liability
Professional Liability (errors and omissions) insurance with respect to its professional activities to be performed under this Contract. This
amount of insurance shall be at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate. Coverage under such policy may be subject to a deductible, not to
exceed $25,000 per occurrence. Contractor agrees to maintain such insurance for at least one (1) year from Contract terminati on.
Contractor therefore agrees that it will not seek or voluntarily accept any such change in its Professional Liability insurance coverage if
such impairment of Dakota County's protection could result; and further, that it will exercise its rights under any "Extended Reporting Period" ("tail
coverage").
☒4. Automobile Liability.
Business Automobile Liability insurance covering liability for Bodily Injury and Property Damage arising out of the ownership, use,
maintenance, or operation of all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles and other motor vehicles utilized by Contractor in connection with its
performance under this Contract. Such policy shall provide total liability limits for combined Bodily Injury and/or Property Damage in the amount
of at least $2,000,000 per accident
☒Such policy, shall include Dakota County, its officers, employees and agents as Additional Insureds thereunder.
Page 88 of 397
Dakota County Contract #DCA23518
Exhibit 3 - Page 2 of 2
☐5. Network Security and Privacy Liability.
Network security and privacy liability insurance, including first-party costs, for any breach that compromises data obtained while providing
services under this Agreement. This insurance should to cover claims which may arise from failure of Contractor’s security resulting in, but not limited
to, computer attacks, unauthorized access, disclosure of not public data including but not limited to confidential or private information, transmission
of a computer virus or denial of service. The required limit shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence with a $4,000,000 aggregate limit. Claims-
made coverage is acceptable. Such insurance shall name Dakota County, its officials, employees, volunteers and agents as additional insureds. The
policy shall provide an extended reporting period of not less than thirty -six (36) months from the expiration date of the policy, if the policy if not
renewed.
☒6. Evidence of Insurance.
Contractor shall promptly provide Dakota County with a Certificate of Insurance prior to commencement of any work. At least 1 0 days
prior to termination of any such coverage, Contractor shall provide Dakota County with evidence that such coverage will be renewed or replaced
upon termination with insurance that complies with these provisions.
☒7. Insurer: Policies.
All policies of insurance shall be issued by financially responsible insurers licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota by a n insurer
with a current A.M. Best Company rating of at least A:VII.
☒8. Release and Waiver.
Contractor agrees to rely entirely upon its own property insurance for recovery with respect to any damage, loss or injury to the property
interests of Contractor. Contractor hereby releases Dakota County, its officers, employees, agents, and others acting on their behalf, from all claims,
and all liability or responsibility to Contractor, and to anyone claiming through or under Contractor, by way of subrogation or otherwise, for any loss
of or damage to Contractor's business or property caused by fire or other peril or event, even if such fire or other peril or event was caused in whole
or in part by the negligence or other act or omission of Dakota County or other party who is to be released by the terms here of, or by anyone for
whom such party may be responsible.
Contractor agrees to effect such revision of any property insurance policy as may be necessary in order to permit the release and waiver
of subrogation agreed to herein. Contractor shall, upon the request of Dakota County, promptly provide a Certificate of Insur ance, or other form of
evidence as may be reasonably requested by Dakota County, evidencing that the full waiver of subrogation privilege contemplated by this provision
is present; and/or, if so requested by Dakota County, Contractor shall provide a full and complete copy of the pertinent property insurance policy(ies).
Revised: 11/23
Page 89 of 397
6.i
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Purchase of a Standby Generator for the Par 3 Maintenance
Building
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
Trey Carlson, Recreation Facilities
Coordinator
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the purchase of a standby generator for the Mendota Heights Par 3 Maintenance
Building from Allied Generators for $11,350.
BACKGROUND:
In the past few years the golf course has had several incidents when the maintenance building
has lost power due to a power outage. The golf course property has overhead powerlines,
which are more susceptible to power outages than underground lines. In the winter when there
is an outage, staff are called in to bring and operate a generator at the maintenance building
to ensure the Riser Room does not freeze. If the Riser Room pipes were to freeze, this would
lead to significant water damage to the facility and negative impacts to the equipment stored
within the facility over the winter. In the warm months when there is an outage, our
maintenance team has limitations on what can be completed without power within the facility
to complete daily maintenance tasks.
With the Par 3 Community Golf Course budget showing an estimated operating surplus at the
end of September of $124,240--the Par 3 is in a financial position to afford this expenditure.
Staff has received two quotes for the 18kw Generac natural gas generator and installation:
Allied Generators: $11,350
Mid-Northern Services: $14,250
In addition to the generator and installation, Xcel Energy will provide a natural gas connection
to the site. This will cost $3,040.32.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Page 90 of 397
The 2026 budget included $12,500 out of the Par 3 Fund. There are sufficient funds in the Par 3
Fund to cover this expenditure.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 91 of 397
6.j
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Authorize the Purchase of a Replacement Fire Department Chief 1 Vehicle
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief
ACTION REQUEST:
Authorize the purchase of a 2026 Chevrolet Tahoe SSV and related equipment as the
replacement for the Fire Department’s current Chief 1 vehicle.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the 2026 budget, $85,000 was included for the purchase of a full-size SUV and
required equipment to replace the fire department’s 16-year-old Chief 1 vehicle. The proposed
replacement is a Chevrolet Tahoe SSV. Also included in this purchase request are the
emergency lights and siren equipment, graphics for the vehicle’s exterior, and installation of
the radio and storage systems needed for the equipment carried in the vehicle.
•The Tahoe will be purchased from North Country GM, the holder of the state
purchasing contract for emergency service GM products.
•The emergency lights, siren and other electronic hardware equipment will be purchased
from and installed by Emergency Automotive Technologies, Inc.
•The graphics for the exterior of the new vehicle will be provided by Grafix Shoppe.
•Mobile radio installation will be provided by ANCOM.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The Chief 1 vehicle replacement is included in the 2026 budget. To be paid for out of the
equipment reserve fund. Total anticipated cost for the new Chief 1 vehicle with all equipment
and installation is:
2026 Tahoe
SSV
$54,626.00
EATI $20,939.00
Radio Install $1,000.00
Graphics $2,450.00
Page 92 of 397
Total $79,015.00
This purchase is expected to come in under budget by approximately $5,985.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Chief 1 Vehicle Council Addendum Memo
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 93 of 397
1
Mendota Heights Fire Department Memo
TO: Cheryl Jacobson, City Administrator
FROM: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief
DATE: December 4, 2025
SUBJECT: Addendum – Background on Chief 1 Vehicle Selection
This memo provides some background on why we’re recommending the Chevrolet Tahoe SSV for the
new Chief 1 vehicle instead of a Ford Expedition.
While most of the City’s fleet is made up of Ford products, including F-Series trucks in Public Works
and Ford Explorers in the Police Department, the needs for a full-size command vehicle are a bit
different. In the public safety world, the Chevrolet Tahoe has really become the standard for chief and
command work. For more than two decades, the Tahoe PPV/SSV line has been one of the most
widely used full-size SUVs in fire, EMS, and law enforcement fleets across the country.
A big part of that comes from GM’s long-standing support of purpose-built emergency vehicles. Their
police and emergency service programs give agencies consistent availability, well-developed upfitting
options, and a platform that’s proven to handle the demands of emergency response. The Tahoe’s
frame, payload, cooling system, and overall durability hold up well with the added radios, gear, and
the heavier electrical loads that come with lights, sirens, and other equipment. It also provides the
cargo space and 4x4 capability that command vehicles need year-round.
Ford, on the other hand, hasn’t seen the same level of adoption of the Expedition in public safety. It’s
a good vehicle, but fewer departments use it in emergency service roles, which means less
standardized upfitting, fewer purpose-built mounting options, and not as much statewide or national
support compared to what agencies get with the Tahoe.
Choosing the Tahoe simply aligns us with what most fire departments and other public safety
agencies are already using for their command vehicles. It gives us a dependable, well-supported
platform that fits the operational needs of the Chief 1 role.
Page 94 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
6.k
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Fire Holiday Pay Policy
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City
Administrator
Dan Johnson, Fire Chief
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Policy 2.13: Fire Holiday Pay which will provide holiday pay for firefighters who
respond during designated holidays.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed policy provides additional compensation for firefighters responding to calls that
occur on designated holidays. As proposed, the policy will provide 1.5-times the standard rate
of pay during designated holidays to firefighters responding to emergencies. Only calls that
occur on the official designated holiday will be eligible for this additional pay.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
$3,500 has been included in the 2026 budget to cover additional costs for the addition of Fire
Holiday Pay.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Policy 2.13 - Fire Holiday Pay
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 95 of 397
2.13 Fire Holiday Pay Policy – Page 1
City of Mendota Heights: Fire Holiday Pay
Policy Number 2.13
Adopted: Anticipated 12/16/2025
Authority: City Council
1.PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to outline holiday pay for Firefighters.
2.SCHEDULE
The following calendar days are city designated holidays:
New Year’s Day January 1
Martin Luther King Day January (3rd Monday)
Presidents’ Day February (3rd Monday)
Memorial Day May (last Monday)
Juneteenth June 19
Independence Day July 4
Labor Day September (1st Monday)
Veteran’s Day November 11
Thanksgiving Day November (4th Thursday)
Christmas Eve Day December 24
Christmas Day December 25
3.POLICY
Firefighters who respond to fire calls on a city designated holiday as defined above will receive
1.5 times their regular rate of pay. Fire Holiday Pay is only effective on the actual holiday as
identified above in section 2 of this policy.
4.AUTHORITY
The City Council will consider and may approve substantial amendments to this policy. The City
Administrator may make incidental changes without City Council approval.
Page 96 of 397
6.l
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-88 Adopting the 2026 Pay Classification Plan for
Non-Union Employees
ITEM TYPE: Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City
Administrator
Kristen Schabacker, Finance
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2025-88 Adopting the 2026 Pay Classification Plan for Non-Union
Employees.
BACKGROUND:
The 2026 Employee Position Classification and Compensation Matrix for non-union employees
includes a 3.5% wage increase for 2026. Half a percent of this increase represents additional
costs that employees will pay to cover premiums required under the new Minnesota Paid
Family and Medical Leave mandate.
In addition to the COLA increase, the proposed compensation matrix for non-union employees
includes reclassifications that raise the paygrade of the following positions: Finance Director,
Public Works Director, Assistant City Administrator, Police Captain, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public Works Director, Public Works Superintendent, Natural Resources
Manager, Recreation Facilities Coordinator, and Recreation Program Coordinator. These
reclassifications are based on the City’s annual job market analysis, which reviews how the
compensation plan compares with that of comparable cities to maintain alignment with
market compensation trends. The proposed changes support the City's efforts to align
compensation with market averages. Each position proposed for reclassification had a
deviation of five percent or more below the market average.
The comparison cities selected for the market analysis were those that responded from the list
used in the 2023 Compensation Study. These cities represent a range of characteristics such as
size, programs and services, service level expectations, and geographic proximity that make
them appropriate comparison points for the City of Mendota Heights. Not all comparison
cities have positions directly comparable to those in Mendota Heights. The market analysis
Page 97 of 397
included only roles with clear alignment with positions at the City of Mendota Heights. Cities
included in the analysis were Apple Valley, Chaska, Farmington, Golden Valley, Hastings, Inver
Grove Heights, Lake Elmo, Lakeville, Little Canada, Saint Anthony Village, Savage, South Saint
Paul, Victoria, and West St. Paul.
Conducting a market analysis and making corresponding adjustments has been an annual
practice since the City’s last compensation study. The Council directed staff to complete this
analysis each year to maintain market alignment and avoid the need for significant corrections
after several years without adjustments. One trend that continues from the 2023
Compensation Study is that Mendota Heights’ pay ranges are narrower than those offered by
many comparison cities, a disparity that is most notable for employees in higher pay grades.
Another change to the pay matrix in 2026 is the addition of a crime analyst position. This
position was reviewed as a part of the 2026 budget discussions and represents 0.5 FTE, which
is proposed as a reclassification of an existing employee. The current employee who will be
taking on this role is currently a police records specialist. Beginning in 2026, she will continue
in her existing role for half of her scheduled time, but the other half she will serve as a Crime
Analyst for the City. The Crime Analyst will be compensated at step 4 of the pay scale at a rate
of $44.94 per hour. This reclassification leverages the employee's recent professional
development and skills to maximize existing staffing resources to address departmental needs.
The Crime Analyst job description is attached to this agenda item. The current employee
would begin their duties for the reclassified position on January 1, 2026.
Reclassification of positions does not result in the addition of any new employees and does
not create any vacant positions that require additional staff.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The proposed pay classification plan for non-union employees has been included in the 2026
budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-88 Non-Union Compensation Matrix
2.2026 Final Pay Scale
3.Crime Analyst Job Description
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 98 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-88
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2026 PAY CLASSIFICATION
PLAN FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a grade and step pay system for non-union
employees; and
WHEREAS, based upon recommendations of the city administrator, the City Council
has determined the appropriate placement of each position in a grade and the incumbent
employee in a step; and
WHEREAS, it is also necessary to set salaries for part-time employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following 2026 compensation
items are approved as of January 1, 2026:
1.The 2026 Employee Position Placement/Pay Classification Plan for non-union
employees.
2.The following salaries shall be implemented for part-time employees:
Fire Chief $23,981*
Assistant Fire Chief $14,056
*Annual compensation for administrative and other department responsibilities
excluding fire calls.
3.The following stipends are implemented for:
Captains
Training Officer
Assistant Training Officer
$2,259/annually
$4,964/annually
$1,986/annually
4.The following hourly rates of pay for volunteer firefighters for fire calls and
training:
0-1 Years $12.48
FF I, First Responder, Hazmat Operational $16.56
FF II, First Responder, Hazmat Operational $19.03
Lieutenant $19.85
Captain $21.51
Page 99 of 397
Assistant Training Officer
Training Officer
Assistant Fire Chief
Fire Chief
Special Operations Team Member Call Out
$21.51
$24.81
$29.78**
$29.78**
Same as Mendota Hts Police
Officer on SOT
**Hourly compensation for fire calls and training.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 16th day of December 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 100 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
FINAL SALARY MATRIX (2026)
3.5%
Grade Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 $49,907 $51,654 $53,462 $55,333 $57,269 $59,274 $61,348
2 $52,901 $54,753 $56,669 $58,653 $60,706 $62,830 $65,029
3 $56,076 $58,038 $60,069 $62,172 $64,348 $66,600 $68,931
4 $59,440 $61,520 $63,674 $65,902 $68,209 $70,596 $73,067
5 Office Support Specialist $63,006 $65,212 $67,494 $69,856 $72,301 $74,832 $77,451
6 Utility Billing Clerk $66,787 $69,124 $71,544 $74,048 $76,639 $79,322 $82,098
7 Police Support Specialist
Deputy City Clerk $70,794 $73,272 $75,836 $78,491 $81,238 $84,081 $87,024
8 Recycling/Sustainability Coordinator $75,042 $77,668 $80,387 $83,200 $86,112 $89,126 $92,245
9
Recreation Program Coordinator
Recreation Facilities Coordinator
Administrative Special Projects Coordinator $79,544 $82,328 $85,210 $88,192 $91,279 $94,474 $97,780
10
Accountant
Communications Coordinator
Fire Marshal
Crime Analyst
$84,317 $87,268 $90,322 $93,484 $96,755 $100,142 $103,647
11 Senior Engineering Technician $89,376 $92,504 $95,742 $99,093 $102,561 $106,150 $109,866
12 City Clerk
Natural Resources Manager $94,738 $98,054 $101,486 $105,038 $108,714 $112,519 $116,458
13 $100,423 $103,937 $107,575 $111,340 $115,237 $119,271 $123,445
14 $106,448 $110,174 $114,030 $118,021 $122,152 $126,427 $130,852
15
Community Development Manager
Assistant City Engineer
Public Works Superintendent
$112,835 $116,784 $120,872 $125,102 $129,481 $134,013 $138,703
16 $119,605 $123,791 $128,124 $132,608 $137,250 $142,053 $147,025
17 $126,781 $131,219 $135,811 $140,565 $145,484 $150,576 $155,847
18 Police Captain
Parks & Rec/Asst Public Works Director $134,388 $139,092 $143,960 $148,999 $154,214 $159,611 $165,197
19
Assistant City Administrator
Finance Director
Public Works Director
$142,452 $147,437 $152,598 $157,939 $163,466 $169,188 $175,109
20 Police Chief $150,999 $158,549 $166,476 $174,800 $183,540 $192,717 $202,353
21 City Administrator $160,059 $168,061 $176,465 $185,288 $194,552 $204,280 $214,494
22 $169,662 $178,145 $187,052 $196,405 $206,225 $216,537 $227,363
Step 4 = Midpoint
Step
Page 101 of 397
Pay Grade: 10
Points: 330
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CRIME ANALYST
Department: Police
Reports to: Police Captain
FLSA Status: Non-Exempt
General Definition of Work
The Crime Analyst provides tactical, strategic, administrative, and operational intelligence analysis of data
relating to crime to support the police department, other city departments, and overall community. The
crime analyst is responsible for collecting and analyzing data from multiple sources, describing crime
patterns, trends, and potential suspects, and determining the relevance of the data to aid in crime prevention
and enhancing the investigation process.
Qualification Requirements
To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential function satisfactorily.
The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
Essential Functions
Analysis
1.Research, collect, analyze, and map crime trends and patterns. Use data to identify relationships and
track crime trends as a critical component of community-oriented and proactive problem-solving
policing.
2.Research, organize, compile, and analyze data and information for assigned special projects. Coordinate
projects with regional agencies, city departments and other organizations.
3.Use federal, state, and local criminal systems and databases to research and evaluate data. Use
professional journals, training, academic research, and other outside resources to identify emerging
threats and support analysis and reporting processes.
4.Provide analytical, physical, and/or coordination assistance during major case investigations such as
lead tracking, link construction, crime mapping, or other duties.
5.Conduct analyses through a variety of resources including telephone, social media, financial
statements, intelligence reports, operational maps, etc.
Reporting and Sharing
1.Prepare comprehensive written reports and oral presentations.
2.Prepare reports, tactical action plans, and presentations using maps, charts, crime bulletins, statistics,
and graphs to inform department staff of past, present, and future crime trends.
3.Use crime mapping and geographic information systems to demonstrate relationships and enhance the
visual presentation of the research data.
4.Inspect and route relevant crime bulletins and alerts.
5.Use the department’s information systems to extract data and design user-friendly reports when
needed.
Page 102 of 397
Pay Grade: 10
Points: 330
6.Prepare statistical analysis presentations and assessments for use in budgeting and staffing
deployments.
Support
1.Assist investigative and administrative staff in planning the deployment of resources for the prevention,
intervention, and suppression of criminal activity.
2.Work with staff members to develop investigative leads to support case investigations and prosecution
of criminal offenders.
3.Provide support to others in preparation of documents, research of data, execution of tasks, or
assistance with visual documents including graphics, maps, charts, and photos.
4.Participate in police department initiatives.
5.Assist with the department’s social media platforms to help solve crime and share critical information
in a timely manner.
Networking
1.Attend meetings of law enforcement personnel to collect and share information on crime series,
patterns, new methodologies and developing tools.
2.Network with analysts and crime prevention specialists from other jurisdictions to promote intelligence
and information sharing.
3.Performs other duties and activities as assigned.
Knowledge Skills and Abilities
1.Knowledge and proficiency of law enforcement applications
2.Ability to gather, process and share protected and law enforcement sensitive information.
3.Knowledge of crime pattern analysis techniques.
4.Proven ability to work independently to prioritize work requests as well as establish and maintainpositive working relationships.
5.Strong critical thinking and organizational skills, and decision-making abilities.
6.Demonstrate ability to analyze information from varied sources and develop conclusions.
7.Strong analytical, problem solving and research skills.
8.Excellent communication and presentation skills.
9.Ability to maintain strict confidentiality.
Education and Experience
Bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, law enforcement, computer forensics geography, computer
science/engineering or a related field or the equivalent combination of education and experience.
Minimum of one year of research, analysis, or data-oriented work experience.
Proficiency in Microsoft Office products
Valid driver’s license.
Desired Qualifications
Page 103 of 397
Pay Grade: 10
Points: 330
Master’s Degree in Crime Analytics or similar.
Specific experience as a data or crime analyst with a public safety/law enforcement agency.
Certifications relating to working as an analyst and experience using the State/Federal Criminal Justice
Information Networks (i.e. NCIC, CJIS, etc.)
Experience or education in the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS).
Physical Requirements
This work requires frequent exertion of up to 10 pounds of force and occasional exertion of up to 25 pounds of
force; work regularly requires sitting, speaking or hearing, using hands to finger, handle or feel and repetitive
motions and occasionally requires standing, walking and reaching with hands and arms. Work has standard
vision requirements; vocal communication is required for expressing or exchanging ideas by means of the
spoken word and conveying detailed or important instructions to others accurately, loudly, or quickly; hearing
is required to perceive information at normal spoken word levels. Work requires preparing and analyzing
written or computer data and observing general surroundings and activities.
Environmental Conditions
Work has no exposure to environmental conditions; work is generally in a moderately noisy location (e.g.
business office, light traffic).
Page 104 of 397
6.m
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve 2026-2027 Public Works Union Contract with Teamsters Local 320
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City
Administrator
Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the 2026-2027 Labor Agreement with the Teamsters Local 320 representing Public
Works employees.
BACKGROUND:
Attached for review and consideration is the 2026-2027 labor agreement between the City of
Mendota Heights and the Minnesota Teamsters, Local 320. This union represents the city's
Public Works Maintenance Workers, Lead Workers, and the Assistant Fleet Manager/Mechanic.
City staff and Teamsters representatives have reached a tentative agreement on revisions to
the 2026–2027 labor contract for the Public Works bargaining unit. The changes include
statutory updates, compensation adjustments, benefit modifications, and clarification of
existing practices. All tentative agreements are subject to City Council approval.
The proposed contract includes a 3.5% cost of living increase for wages effective January 1,
2026, consistent with the proposed cost of living adjustment for the city's non-union
employees. The contract also includes an anticipated 3% wage increase effective January 1,
2027.
The union has voted to approve the proposed agreement.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The costs included in the contract have been included in the 2026 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.2026-2027 Teamsters 320 Contract
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Page 105 of 397
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 106 of 397
LABOR AGREEMENT
between
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
and
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC
AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
EMPLOYEES' UNION,
LOCAL NO. 320
Representing
PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2026 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2027
Page 107 of 397
ARTICLE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1 Purpose of Agreement 1
2 Recognition 1
3 Union Security 1
4 Employer Security 2
5 Employer Authority 2
6 Employee Rights – Grievance Procedure 2
7 Definitions 4
8 Savings Clause 5
9 Work Schedules 5
10 Overtime Pay 6
11 Call Back 6
12 Standby 6
13 Legal Defense 7
14 Right to Subcontract 7
15 Discipline 7
16 Seniority 8
17 Probationary Periods 8
18 Safety 8
19 Job Posting 8
20 Waiver 9
21 Wages 9
22 Clothing 9
23 Insurance 10
24 Holidays 10
25 Personal Leave and Extended Disability Protection 11
26 Funeral Leave 12
27 Vacation 12
28 Injury on Duty 12
29 National Teamsters Drive 12
30 Educational Incentive 13
31 Duration 13
Signature Page 14
Appendix A
City of Mendota Heights Drug/Alcohol Testing Policy 15
Memorandum of Understanding (Post-Employment Health
Savings Plan 17
Memorandum of Understanding (Parks Division Work Hours) 18
Page 108 of 397
1
LABOR AGREEMENT
between
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
and
MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
EMPLOYEES' UNION, LOCAL NO. 320
ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into between the City of Mendota Heights; hereinafter called
Employer, and Local No. 320, Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement
Employees' Union. The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to:
1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment;
1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement's
interpretation and/or application;
1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties; and
1.4 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment
for the duration of the Agreement.
The Employer and the Union, through this Agreement, continue their dedication to the highest
quality of public service. Both parties recognize this Agreement as a pledge of this dedication.
ARTICLE 2. RECOGNITION
2.1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 179A.03 subdivision 8 in an appropriate bargaining unit consisting
of the following job classifications:
Public Works Lead Worker
Public Works Maintenance Worker
Public Works Mechanic/Assistant Fleet Manager
2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or
exclusion of the new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the State of
Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services for determination.
ARTICLE 3. UNION SECURITY
In recognition of the Union as the exclusive representative, the Employer shall:
3.1 Deduct each payroll period an amount sufficient to provide the payment of dues
established by the Union from the wages of all employees authorizing in writing such
deduction, and
3.2 Remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of the Union.
Page 109 of 397
2
3.3 The Union may designate certain employees from the bargaining unit to act as
stewards and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice.
3.4 The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all
claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of
any action taken or not taken by the City under the provisions of this Article.
ARTICLE 4. EMPLOYER SECURITY
4.1 The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement, it will not cause, encourage,
participate in or support any strike, slow down or other interruption of or interference
with the normal functions of the Employer.
4.2 Any employee who engages in a strike may have his/her appointment terminated by
the Employer effective the date the violation first occurs. Such termination shall be
effective upon written notice served upon the employee.
4.3 An employee who is absent from any portion of his/her work assignment without
permission, or who abstains wholly or in part from the full performance of his/her duties
without permission from his/her Employer on the date or dates when a strike occurs is
prima facie presumed to have engaged in a strike on such date or dates.
4.4 An employee who knowingly strikes and whose employment has been terminated for
such action may, subsequent to such violation, be appointed or reappointed or
employed or re-employed, but the employee shall be on probation for two (2) years
with respect to such tenure of employment, or contract of employment, as he/she may
have theretofore been entitled.
4.5 No employee shall be entitled to any daily pay, wages or per diem for the days on
which he/she engaged in a strike.
ARTICLE 5. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY
5.1 The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all
manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and
amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the
organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to
establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not
specifically limited by this Agreement.
5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this
Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify,
establish, or eliminate.
ARTICLE 6. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
6.1 Definition of a Grievance
A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or
application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Page 110 of 397
3
6.2 Union Representatives
The Employer will recognize representatives designated by the Union as the grievance
representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities
established by this Article. The Union shall notify the Employer in writing of the names
of such Union representatives and of their successors when so designated.
6.3 Processing of a Grievance
It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that the processing of
grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of
the employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only
when consistent with such employee's duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved
employee and the Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time
without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer
during normal working hours provided the employee and the Union Representative
have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor, who has
determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work
programs of the Employer.
6.4 Procedure
Grievances, as defined by Section 6.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the
following procedure:
Step 1. An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application
of this· Agreement shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged
violation has occurred, present such grievance to the employee's supervisor as
designated by the Employer. The Employer's designated representative will discuss
and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after
receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in
writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the
provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy requested
and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Employer
designated representative's final answer to Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in
writing to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered
waived.
Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and
discussed with the Employer designated Step 2 representative. The Employer
designated representative shall give the Union the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing
within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer designated representative's
receipt of the Step 2 appeal. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the
Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and
discussed with the Employer designated Step 3 representative. The Employer
designated Step 3 representative shall give the Union the Employer's answer in writing
within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer designated representative's
receipt of the Step 3 appeal. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the
Page 111 of 397
4
Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted
to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act
of 1971, as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with
the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Bureau of
Mediation Services.
6.5 Arbitrator’s Authority
A.The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or
subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall
consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer
and the Union, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue
not so submitted.
B.The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent
with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations
having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in
writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of
briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension.
The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union and shall be
based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of
this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented.
C.The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne
equally by the Employer and the Union provided that each party shall be
responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party
desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be
made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of
the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally.
6.6 Waiver
If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be
considered "waived." If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified
time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis
of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an
appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Union may elect to treat the
grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next
step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the
Employer and the Union.
ARTICLE 7. DEFINITIONS
7.1 Union: The Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union,
Local 320.
7.2 Employer: The individual municipality designated by this Agreement.
7.3 Union Member: A member of the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement
Page 112 of 397
5
Employees' Union, Local No. 320.
7.4 Employee: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit.
7.5 Base Pay Rate: The employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any other
special allowances.
7.6 Seniority: Length of continuous service with the Employer.
7.7 Compensatory Time: Time off the employee's regularly scheduled work schedule
equal in time to overtime worked.
7.8 Overtime: Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of
the normal work schedule in effect, (except for shift changes).
7.9 Call Back: Return of an employee to a specified work site to perform assigned duties
at the express authorization of the Employer at a time other than an assigned shift. An
extension of, or early report to an assigned shift, is not a call back.
7.10 Strike: Concerted action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one's
position, the stoppage of work, slowdown, or abstinence in whole or in part from the
full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of
inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions, compensation, or the
rights, privileges or obligations of employment.
ARTICLE 8. SAVINGS CLAUSE
This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the
signed municipality. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary
to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal
has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions
of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be
renegotiated at the request of either party.
ARTICLE 9. WORK SCHEDULES
9.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the Employer. Service to the public may require
the establishment of regular shifts for some employees on a daily or weekly basis
other than the normal work schedule. The normal work schedule shall not exceed eight
(8)hours within a twenty-four (24) hour period, or forty (40) hours in a five (5) day
period, (except for shift changes). The normal work schedule shall not involve a split
work week. The Employer will give advance notice to the employees affected by the
establishment of work days different from the employee's normal work schedule.
9.2 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but not
limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no
advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee working other than
the normal work day be scheduled to work more than the scheduled shift; however,
each employee has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested, unless
unusual circumstances prevent him/her from so working.
Page 113 of 397
6
9.3 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that
schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays.
ARTICLE 10. OVERTIME PAY
10.1 Hours worked in excess of the normal work schedule in effect within a twenty-four (24)
hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty (40) hours within a five (5)
day period will be compensated at one and one-half (1½) times the employee's regular
base pay rate. Pay for the seventh (7th) consecutive day will be at double (2) time the
employee's regular base pay rate. Hours worked between midnight and 7 a.m. shall
be paid a differential of seven dollars ($7.00) per hour for a snow or ice emergency.
10.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable.
10.3 Overtime refused by employees will, for record purposes under Article 10.2, be
considered as unpaid overtime worked.
10.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall
not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked.
10.5 An employee may choose to receive compensatory time as compensation for overtime
hours at the rate of 1.5 hours for each hour worked. Beginning November 1, 2016, the
maximum allowable balance of such hours carried into the next twelve months (i.e.,
November 1, to October 31) shall be one hundred fifty (150) hours. The Employer will
convert to compensation an employee balance in excess of the 150 hours maximum.
10.6 An employee may request to convert to compensation any portion of their
compensatory time balance the second pay period in May and November if requested
in writing with the submission of the employee time sheet.
10.7 One hundred percent (100%) of the compensatory time balance converted to
compensation in May and November will be contributed into the employee's State of
Minnesota Post-Retirement Health Savings Plan.
10.8 Public works employees will be allowed to complete their regularly scheduled shift with
the use of accrued leave when called in early or notified in advance that they need to
report for a snow event. For the purpose of computing overtime, accrued leave used
prior to the snow event will be considered hours worked.
ARTICLE 11. CALL BACK
An employee called in for work at a time other than his/her normal scheduled shift will be
compensated for a minimum of three (3) hours at one and one-half (1½) times the employee's
base pay rate. At the employee’s discretion may choose to receive compensatory time at the
rate of one and one-half (1 ½) times for each hour worked.
ARTICLE 12. STANDBY
Employees are expected to perform certain routine tasks on Saturdays, Sundays, and
holidays and in conjunction therewith, must be available for servicing emergency calls also.
Stand-by duty pay shall be two (2) hours at one and one-half (1½) times base rate for each
Page 114 of 397
7
twenty-four (24) hour period or major portion thereof. Compensation for performing routine
tasks shall be one (1) hour at one and one-half (1½) times base rate for checking of two (2)
sewer stations and any other emergency duties. This combination of holiday and weekend
compensation shall be at the minimum rate of five (5) hours at one and one-half (1½) times
base rate for the combination Saturday/Sunday weekend, and eleven (11) hours at one and
one-half (1½) times base rate for a three (3) day weekend.
ARTICLE 13. LEGAL DEFENSE
13.1 Employees involved in litigation because of negligence, ignorance of laws,
nonobservance of laws, or as a result of employee judgmental decision may not
receive legal defense by the municipality.
13.2 Any employee who is charged with a traffic violation, ordinance violation or criminal
offense arising from acts performed within the scope of his/her employment, when
such act is performed in good faith and under direct order of his/her supervisor, shall
be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such
employee in defending against such charge.
ARTICLE 14. RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT
Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or restrict the right of the Employer from
subcontracting work performed by employees covered by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 15. DISCIPLINE
15.1 The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in the
form of:
A.oral reprimand;
B.written reprimand;
C.suspension;
D.demotion; or
E.discharge
15.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form.
15.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, notices of demotion, and notices of
discharge to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and
acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the Union will receive a
copy of such reprimands and/or notices.
15.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times
under the direct supervision of the Employer.
15.5 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action
unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a Union representative
present at such meeting.
15.6 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the Union at Step 3 of the
Page 115 of 397
8
Grievance Procedure under Article 6.
ARTICLE 16. SENIORITY
Seniority will be the determining criteria for transfers, promotions and layoffs only when all
other qualification factors are equal.
ARTICLE 17. PROBATIONARY PERIODS
17.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) month probationary
period.
17.2 All employees will serve a six (6) months' probationary period in any job classification
in which the employee has not served a probationary period.
17.3 At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be
terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer.
17.4 At any time during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may
be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion
of the Employer.
ARTICLE 18. SAFETY
The Employer and the Union agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions,
to cooperate in safety manners and to encourage employees to work in a safe manner.
ARTICLE 19. JOB POSTING
19.1 The Employer and the Union agree that permanent job vacancies within the
designated bargaining unit shall be filled based on the concept of promotion from
within provided that applicants:
A.have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy;
and
B.have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job vacancy.
19.2 Employees filling a higher job class based on the provisions of this Article shall be
subject to the conditions of Article 17 (Probationary Periods).
19.3 The Employer has the right of final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted
jobs based on qualifications, abilities and experience.
19.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be posted for five (5) working
days so that members of the bargaining unit can be considered for such vacancies.
Page 116 of 397
9
ARTICLE 20. WAIVER
20.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations
regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the
provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded.
20.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during negotiations, which resulted in this
Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and
proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed from law
by bargaining. All are set forth in writing in this Agreement for the stipulated duration
of this Agreement. The Employer and the Union each voluntarily and unqualifiedly
waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions or
employment referred to or covered by this Agreement, even though such terms or
conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both
parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed.
ARTICLE 21. WAGES
21.1
2026 Wages Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Maintenance
Worker $31.26 $34.53 $37.97 $41.08
Lead Maintenance
Worker
Assistant Fleet
Manager/Mechanic
$43.13 $44.65 $46.20 $47.83 $49.49
2027 Wages Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Maintenance
Worker $32.19 $35.56 $39.11 $42.31
Lead Maintenance
Worker
Assistant Fleet
Manager/Mechanic
$44.42 $45.99 $47.59 $49.26 $50.98
21.2
Work performed, as assigned by the Employer, to replace an absent mechanic shall be
compensated at one-half (1/2) the difference between the employee's regular
compensation and the mechanic's regular compensation. The mechanic is absent when
on authorized leave or vacation.
ARTICLE 22. CLOTHING
22.1 Employees shall receive an annual allowance for clothing and boots. The allowance
will increase annually based on the increase allocated to the general wage increase.
That allowance will be as follows:
Page 117 of 397
10
2026 2027
Maintenance Workers
Lead Maintenance Workers
$724 $746
Assistant Fleet Manager/Mechanic $414 $426
22.1.1 In lieu of a clothing allowance, the Assistant Fleet Manager/Mechanic position will
receive uniforms through an approved vendor.
22.2 Employees will be responsible for wearing clothing with the City logo or city
identification on the outermost layer. A uniform allowance account will be
established for each employee in the amount of $300 for 2026 to cover costs to
purchase city logoed/city identified t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets and hats. This
amount will be increased annually by the same escalator that is applied to wages.
The allowance shall not be subject to carryover, and monies not expended shall not
be refundable. Any excess expenditures above the annual allocation will be taken
from the employee’s clothing allowance for the following year.
ARTICLE 23. INSURANCE
The Employer will contribute up to a maximum of two thousand dollars ($2,000) per month
per employee towards health, term life, short term disability, long-term disability insurance
and dental insurance. If any City of Mendota Heights employee group is awarded a higher
amount in 2026 or 2027 the Union members shall receive the higher amount.
Employees will be responsible for 50% of the insurance premium charged for the Minnesota
Paid Family Medical Leave program. The City will cover the remaining cost for the premium.
ARTICLE 24. HOLIDAYS
24.1 Thirteen (13) paid 8-hour holidays are granted. Eleven (11) conventional holidays
are as follows:
January 1 New Year’s Day
3rd Monday of February Presidents’ Day
Friday before Easter Good Friday
Last Monday in May Memorial Day
June 19th Juneteenth
July 4 Independence Day
1st Monday in September Labor Day
2nd Monday in October Columbus Day
November 11 Veterans Day
4th Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day
December 25 Christmas
If January 1, New Year's Day; June 19, Juneteenth; July 4, Independence Day;
November 11, Veterans Day; or December 25, Christmas, fall on Saturday, the
preceding Friday shall be considered a holiday. If January 1, June 19*, July 4,
November 11, or December 25 fall on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be
Page 118 of 397
11
considered a holiday.
24.2 In recognition of Martin Luther King's birthday, a thirteenth (13th) day, a floating
holiday (the twelfth holiday), will be granted, conditioned that scheduling arrangements
must be approved by the supervisor at least two (2) days in advance of the floating
holiday. One (1) additional floating holiday, a thirteenth holiday, will be included in the
schedule for a total of two (2) floating holidays. The scheduling of floating holidays
must be approved by the supervisor at least two (2) days in advance of the floating
holiday.
24.3 An employee required to work on a scheduled holiday will be compensated at one and
one-half (1½) times the employee's regular rate of pay, and will receive time off
equivalent to the holiday hours worked, to a maximum of eight (8), at a time
subsequently scheduled by the supervisor. Employees working on Thanksgiving
holiday and Christmas holiday shall receive two (2) times the employee's regular rate
of pay.
ARTICLE 25. PERSONAL LEAVE and EXTENDED DISABILITY PROTECTION
25.1 Personal Leave: All permanent full-time employees shall accrue personal leave at the
rate of four (4) hours per month, to a maximum of 320 hours. Personal leave shall be
available for use without restriction, except prior approval of the supervisor. An
employee shall not be allowed to use more than twenty (20) consecutive personal
days, or a combination of twenty (20) consecutive personal and vacation days, without
prior approval of the City Council.
Each December 1, any employee with an accrued personal leave balance in excess
of 320 hours may convert the excess hours at the rate of fifty percent (50%), to either
additional cash compensation, or additional vacation time. The compensation will be
made, or the extra vacation credited, with the second payroll in December.
25.2 Extended Disability Protection: All permanent full-time employees shall accrue
extended disability leave at the rate of four (4) hours per month, to a cumulative
maximum of six hundred and forty (640) hours. Extended disability protection is
available for use on the first (1st) consecutive day of a personal illness, and thereafter,
or anytime for a work related illness or injury.
Employees are to keep their supervisor informed of their condition. The supervisor
may require a letter of report from the attending physician. Claiming extended disability
leave when physically fit may be cause for disciplinary action, including transfer,
demotion, suspension, or dismissal.
In cases of extreme emergency involving employees with a record of meritorious
service, who through serious or protracted illness have used up all accumulated
personal leave, extended disability leave, vacation leave, and compensatory time off,
an extension of extended disability leave beyond the maximum provided in this
resolution may be granted by the City Council. The resultant deficit will be repaid
promptly through application of future personal and extended disability leave accruals.
25.3 Employees will contribute twenty percent (20%) of their total accrued personal leave
Page 119 of 397
12
hours on November 1 of each year beginning in November of 2007 which will be put
into the Minnesota Post Employment Health Care Savings Plan in their account/name.
25.4 Upon separation or retirement from employment with the City, an employee will
contribute all unused compensatory time, and unused vacation and personal leave,
into the Minnesota Post Employment Health Care Savings Plan in their account/name.
ARTICLE 26. FUNERAL LEAVE
All permanent employees, both full-time and part-time, may attend the funeral of their spouse,
mother, father, children, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandparent, brother-in-
law, sister-in-law, son- in-law, daughter-in-law, and grandchild as paid Funeral Leave. Such
funeral leave shall not exceed twenty- four (24) hours and shall not be counted as sick leave.
ARTICLE 27. VACATION
27.1 Time is accrued according to the following schedule:
Eighty (80) hours after one (1) year service; and eighty (80) hours per year through
four (4) years of service;
One hundred twenty (120) hours per year after five (5) years of service and one
hundred twenty (120) hours per year through nine (9) years of service;
Eight (8) additional hours per year after ten (10) years of service with a maximum of
one hundred sixty (160) after fifteen (15) years of service.
27.2 Employees may accrue vacation leave not to exceed a maximum of two hundred (200)
hours.
27.3 No employees shall be permitted to waive vacation for the purpose of receiving double
pay.
ARTICLE 28. INJURY ON DUTY
Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the Employer and thereby
rendered unable to work for the Employer will be paid the difference between the employee
regular pay and Worker’s Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed forty
five (45) working days per injury, not charged to the employee vacation, sick leave or other
accumulated paid benefits.
In the case that Minnesota Paid Family Medical Leave is eliminated, the injury on duty period
will return to one hundred (100) working days instead of forty-five (45) as stated above.
ARTICLE 29. NATIONAL TEAMSTERS D.R.I.V.E. (Democratic/Republican/Independent Voter Education)
Upon receipt of a properly executed voluntary authorization card from an employee, the City
will deduct from the employee's salary such amounts as the employee authorizes to pay
National Teamsters D.R.I.V.E. Any start-up costs will be reimbursed by the Union.
Substantial changes to existing state or federal leave laws that impact employee benefits
Page 120 of 397
13
ARTICLE 30. EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE
30.1 Certification/License are paid on a straight time basis. Monthly payments for
certification shall be as follows:
MPCA Underground Storage Tank Operator $30.00
Pesticide Applicator License $30.00
Roads Scholar Certification (LTAP) $30.00
Tree Inspector Certification $30.00
Wastewater Operator Certification S-C $30.00
Wastewater Operation Certification D $30.00
Welding Certificate $30.00
Playground Equipment $30.00
Arborist $30.00
30.2 The City reserves the ability to limit the number of compensated certifications/
licenses covered under Article 30.
30.3 In accordance with City Policy 1.10: Training and Travel Expenses Reimbursement
Policy, The City will pay employees to attend training sessions or conferences that
are directly job-related and relevant to the performance of the employee’s work
responsibilities. Responsibilities outlined in the job description, annual work program
requirements and training goals and objectives developed for the employee will be
considered in determining if the request is job-related.
The supervisor and the City Administrator are responsible for determining job-
relatedness and approving or disapproving training and conference attendance. In no
case will city funds be used to pay for, or reimburse, events sponsored by or affiliated
with political parties.
Costs associated with maintaining licensing or other professional accreditation that
are required as part of the minimum qualifications for an employee’s position are
eligible for payment.
30.4 The City will pay an additional $0.25 per hour on base wage for employees who
have a Class A Commercial Driver’s License in 2026 and $0.35 per hour on base
wage for employees who have a Class A Commercial Driver’s License thereafter
starting in 2027.
ARTICLE 31. DURATION
This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2026 and shall remain in full force and
effective until December 31, 2027.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this
November 5 Day of 2025.
Page 121 of 397
14
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320
Mayor Business Agent
City Administrator Steward
Page 122 of 397
15
APPENDIX A
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DRUG/ALCOHOL TESTING POLICY
(Adopted:1/1/2018)
The City of Mendota Heights (hereinafter "City" or "Mendota Heights") values its employees
and citizens, and recognizes the need for a safe, productive and healthy work environment.
Employees who abuse drugs and/or alcohol are less productive, less dependable, and are a
critical threat to the safety, security and welfare of themselves, fellow employees, vendors,
and citizens. It is the policy of the City Mendota Heights to maintain a workplace free from the
use and abuse of drugs and alcohol. The City of Mendota Heights will require that all
employees and applicants participate in, consent and comply with the terms of this Policy as
a condition of employment and continued employment. If questions arise regarding this
Policy, please direct them to the City Administrator.
As part of its continuing effort to protect health, safety and security, the City of Mendota
Heights has adopted a drug/alcohol testing policy in accordance with Minnesota law, as
follows:
1.The use, sale, possession, or transfer of drugs or alcohol are strictly prohibited by all
employees and job applicants on City property, and at all times while City property is
in use.
2.All employees and job applicants are subject to urinalysis or blood testing for the
presence of drugs and/or alcohol, in accordance with this Policy.
3.Job applicants will be tested after an offer of employment has been made in each
case, contingent upon the applicant's successful completion of the testing, and after
the applicant has reviewed and completed the Pre-Testing Acknowledgement form,
which will be supplied by the City.
4.The City of Mendota Heights employees will be subject to testing when there is
reasonable suspicion that:
•They are under the influence of drugs or alcohol; or
•They have violated the policy set forth in Paragraph 1 above; or
•They have sustained a personal injury, or they have caused another employee
to sustain a personal injury; or
•They have caused a work-related accident, or were operating or helping to
operate any machinery, equipment, or vehicle involved in a work-related
accident.
5.Any employee who has been referred for chemical dependency treatment or
evaluation, or is participating in treatment under an employee benefit plan, may be
required to submit to testing during the course of participation in the evaluation or
treatment, and for a period of two years following the completion of any prescribed
chemical dependency treatment program.
Page 123 of 397
16
6. Any employee or job applicant may refuse to submit to testing to be conducted
pursuant to this Policy, but refusal will result in the following consequences:
• As to any job applicant: an immediate withdrawal of the pending job offer;
• As to any employee: discipline or termination of employment, at the sole
discretion of management.
7. All testing will be conducted in accordance with the following procedures:
• Each person to be tested will complete, sign and date a Pre-Testing
Acknowledgment form supplied by the City.
• Each test will be conducted by a laboratory which is authorized by law to conduct
such tests, and which confirms to the City of Mendota Heights that its procedures
are in accordance with Minnesota law.
• All samples which test "positive" on an initial screening test will be subjected to
a confirmatory retest by the laboratory, before the results are reported to the
employee or job applicant;
• Results will be reported to each employee and job applicant in writing within three
(3) working days of the receipt of the results by the City.
• Any employee or job applicant may submit additional information for the purpose
of explaining such test results, or may request a confirmatory retest at his or her
own expense. Any such additional information or request for a retest must be
submitted in writing to the City Administrator of Mendota Heights within five (5)
working days after notice of the results of the test.
A positive result on the final confirmatory retest pursuant to this Policy will result in the
following consequences:
a). Employee on the first incident: the requirement, as a condition of
employment, that the employee successfully complete a drug or alcohol
counseling or rehabilitation program selected by the City, at the
employee's expense, or under an employee benefit coverage program.
b). Employee on the second or subsequent such incident: discipline or
termination from employment, at the sole discretion of the City.
All tests employees will be entitled to receive a copy of the laboratory document
which certifies the test results.
Page 124 of 397
17
APPENDIX B
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
and the TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320
on-behalf of the PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES
The following Letter of Agreement is made between the City of Mendola Heights and
Teamsters Local 320.
WHERE AS, the City of Mendota Heights Public Works and Teamsters Local 320 are in
agreement to the following:
That the City allow employees to participate in a Post Employment Health Savings Plan by
contributing one percent (1%) of their total gross salary per pay period.
FURTHERMORE, the City of Mendota Heights and Teamsters Local 320 agree this will be
in effect starting January 1, 2014.
Page 125 of 397
18
APPENDIX C
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ADOPTED 10/04/2019
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Between the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS and the TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320
On behalf of the
PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES
This is an agreement between the City of Mendota Heights (hereinafter the "Employer") and
Teamsters Local #320 representing Public Works employees, regarding the schedule of
work hours for employees assigned to the parks division, the City and Union agree as
follows:
A.Due to the nature of maintenance work required, from the third weekend in April to
the second weekend in October, regular workday hours and weeks may be varied
for parks maintenance purposes as determined by the Employer.
B.Under Section 9.3 of the Labor Agreement, service to the public may require the
establishment of a regular work schedule that includes work on Saturdays and/or
Sundays. The regular work week shall consist of 80 hours in a two-week period of
time. To regular work schedule will not include the holiday weekends of Memorial
Day, 4th of July, Labor Day and Columbus Day.
C.The work schedule shall be rotated among assigned workers and determined with
advance notice the establishment of workdays different from the schedule, shall be
noticed in accordance with Article 9, Section 9.2 of the Labor Agreement.
D.Overtime pay for affected workers shall be defined as hours worked in excess of the
normal schedule in effect, within a twenty-four (24) hour period (except for shift
changes) or more than (40) hours within a five (5) day period, will be compensated
at one and one half (1.5) times the employees regular base-pay rate. Pay for the
second consecutive non-scheduled day of work shall be at double (2) times the
employee's regular base pay rate. Hours worked between midnight and 7 a.m. shall
be paid a differential of two dollars ($2.00)-per hour for a snow or ice emergency.
Page 126 of 397
6.n
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Ordinance 605 - Amending City Code 10-5-6: Water Surcharge
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT:
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Ordinance 605, amending City Code 10-5-6: Water Surcharge.
BACKGROUND:
Historically, Mendota Heights charges residents a surcharge for operation of its water utility
system. Prior to conveying the water system to Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) in
2016, the city was collecting a ten percent (10%) surcharge. As part of the current agreement
with SPRWS, Mendota Heights reduced the surcharge to five percent (5%) in 2016.
The surcharge funds are used for any water related costs of adjusting valves and hydrants,
relocation of any water infrastructure for street and trail projects, utility billing fees to SPRWS,
painting of hydrants and hydrant markers, etc. The funds could also be used towards any
proposed water projects, such as drinking fountains in parks, dog park, community garden,
etc.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The city council is asked to reduce the surcharge percentage as the water utility fund currently
has an adequate balance to fund current and future activities in the Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP). Adopting the attached Ordinance 605 would reduce the surcharge from five percent
(5%) to two and a half percent (2.5%).
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Ordinance 605 Amending Code Water Surcharge Rate
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 127 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 605
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 6 OF THE CITY CODE
OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, DAKOTA COUNTY,
CONCERNING A WATER SURCHARGE RATE
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain:
Title 10-5-6 is hereby amended as follows:
10-5-6: WATER SURCHARGE:
B.Purpose; Surcharge Imposed: For the purpose of, in part, assisting the city in paying for the
construction, reconstruction, repair, enlargement, improvement or other obtainment, and the
maintenance, operation and use of the city's municipal water system, there is hereby imposed a
surcharge equal to five percent (5%) two and a half percent (2.5%) of the charge imposed for
water supplied to properties located within or without the city. The surcharge may be collected
under agreement with water companies, or in such other manner as may be determined by the city
council. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case where properties within the city are billed for
water on a fixed monthly charge rather than on the basis of water actually used, the city council,
by resolution, may determine the surcharge hereunder for such properties on the basis of what the
surcharge hereunder would have been had said properties been charged on the basis of water
actually used. (1981 Code 806 § 2; amd. Ord. 495, 4-19-2016)
This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of December 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
_______________________________
ATTEST: Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
____________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 128 of 397
6.o
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Grant Agreement for the Geothermal Planning Project
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural
Resources Coordinator
Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve and authorize City Staff to sign the Geothermal Planning Grant agreement between
the City and the MN Department of Commerce.
BACKGROUND:
In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature established the Geothermal Planning Grant Program. The
purpose of the program is to provide financial assistance to local government agencies and
other eligible applicants to determine the feasibility of installing geothermal energy systems.
The city has been awarded up to $130,000 for the planning of a geothermal energy system
that heats and cools the city’s Public Works Facility. Eligible expenses include:
•Analysis of the heating and cooling demand of the building that consumes energy from
the geothermal energy system;
•Evaluation of equipment that could be combined with a geothermal energy system to
meet the building's heating and cooling requirements;
•Analysis of the geologic conditions of the earth in which a geothermal energy system
operates, including the drilling of one or more test wells to characterize geologic
materials and to measure properties of the earth and aquifers that impact the feasibility
of installing and operating a geothermal energy system; and
•Preparation of a financial analysis of the project.
The City approved the recommended proposal submitted by HGA Consulting on November
18, 2025, as the chosen consultant for the project. HGA Consultants provided a cost estimate
for evaluation in the amount of $38,360.00, with an additional cost of $25,000 per test well
boring. The contract drafted by the Minnesota Department of Commerce is attached.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Page 129 of 397
None. The cost of the project will be funded by the MN Department of Commerce under the
grant program. A grant match is not required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Public Works Facility Geothermal Planning Grant Agreement
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure,
Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship
Page 130 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 1
STATE OF MINNESOTA
GRANT CONTRACT AGREEMENT
Swift Contract Number: ### enter ###
This Grant Contract Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Commerce
("State") and City of Mendota Heights, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 ("Grantee").
Recitals
Under Minn. Stat. § 216C.02, subd. 1, the State is empowered to enter into this Grant Contract Agreement. The State
seeks assistance in the promotion of Geothermal Energy resources in Minnesota. The Grantee represents that it is duly
qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this Grant Contract Agreement to the satisfaction of the State.
Grant Contract Agreement
1 Term of Grant Contract Agreement
1.1 Effective Date. December 19, 2025, or the date the State obtains all required signatures, whichever is later.
Per Minnesota Statutes § 16B.98, Subd. 5, the Grantee must not begin work until this Grant Contract
Agreement is fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the Grantee that work may
commence.
Per Minnesota Statutes § 16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this Grant Contract
Agreement is fully executed.
1.2 Expiration Date.
A.December 19, 2026, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this Grant Contract
Agreement: Liability; State Audits; Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; Publicity and
Endorsement; Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and Data Disclosure.
2 Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
The parties will perform the services outlined in Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work.
3 Time
The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this Grant Contract Agreement. In the
performance of this Grant Contract Agreement, time is of the essence and failure to meet a deadline date may
be a basis for a determination by the State’s Authorized Representative that the Grantee has not complied with
the terms of the Grant Contract Agreement. The Grantee is required to perform all the duties cited within clause
two “Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work” within the grant period. The State is not obligated to extend the
grant period.
Page 131 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 2
4 Consideration and Terms of Payment
The consideration for all services performed by the Grantee pursuant to this Grant Contract Agreement shall be
paid by the State as follows:
4.1 Compensation. The total obligation of the State under this Grant Contract Agreement, including all
compensation and reimbursements, is not to exceed One Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($130,000.00),
which shall be paid in accordance with the terms outlined in Exhibit B: Payment Schedule, which is attached
and incorporated into this Grant Contract Agreement.
4.2 Invoices. Payments shall be made by the State after the Grantee’s presentation of invoices for services
satisfactorily performed and the written acceptance of such services by the State’s Authorized Representative.
Invoices shall be submitted timely, with additional details as requested by the State, and according to the
following schedule: Please refer to Exhibit B.
4.3 Retainage. No more than 95 percent of the amount due under this grant contract may be paid until
the final product of this grant contract has been reviewed by the State’s Authorized Representative.
The balance due will be paid when the State’s Authorized Representative determines that the Grantee
has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of this grant contract.
4.4 Unexpended Funds. The Grantee must promptly return to the State any unexpended funds that have not been
accounted for in a financial report to the State.
5 Conditions of Payment
All services provided by the Grantee under this Grant Contract Agreement must be performed to the State’s
satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State’s Authorized Representative and in accordance
with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive
payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local
law.
6 Contracting and Bidding Requirements
The Grantee is required to comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.345, Uniform Municipal Contracting Law.
6.1 The Grantee and any subrecipients must comply with prevailing wage rules per Minnesota Statutes §§ 177.41
through 177.50, as applicable.
6.2 The Grantee and any subrecipients must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred by the
State of Minnesota or the federal government: Suspended and Debarred Vendors, Minnesota Office of State
Procurement.
6.3 The Grantee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the
actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts.
7 Authorized Representatives
7.1 The State’s Authorized Representative is Anna Crouch, Electric Vehicle Rebate Administrator, 651-539-1050,
anna.crouch@state.mn.us, or their successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee’s
performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this Grant Contract Agreement. If the
Page 132 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 3
services are satisfactory, the State’s Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice
submitted for payment.
7.2 The Grantee’s Authorized Representative is Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator, 651-255-1123,
KSpreiter@Mendotaheightsmn.gov, or their successor. If the Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at
any time during this Grant Contract Agreement, the Grantee must immediately notify the state.
7.3 The Grantee must clearly post on the Grantee’s website the names of, and contact information for, the
Grantee’s leadership and the employee or other person who directly manages and oversees this Grant Contract
Agreement on behalf of the Grantee.
8 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete
8.1 Assignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Grant Contract
Agreement without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed agreement, executed and approved by
the authorized parties or their successors.
8.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Grant Contract Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective
until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Grant
Contract Agreement or their successors.
8.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this Grant Contract Agreement, that failure does not waive
the provision or its right to enforce it.
8.4 Contract Complete. This Grant Contract Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the
State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Grant Contract Agreement, whether written or
oral, may be used to bind either party.
9 Subcontracting and Subcontract Payment
9.1 A subrecipient is a person or entity that has been awarded a portion of the work authorized by this Grant
Contract Agreement by Grantee. The Grantee must document any subaward through a formal legal agreement.
The Grantee must provide timely notice to the State of any subrecipient(s) prior to the subrecipient(s)
performing work under this Grant Contract Agreement.
9.2 The Grantee must monitor the activities of the subrecipient(s) to ensure the subaward is used for authorized
purposes; is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the subaward, Minnesota Statutes § 16B.97, Subd.4
(a) (1) and other relevant statutes and regulations; and that subaward performance goals are achieved.
9.3 During this Grant Contract Agreement, if a subrecipient is determined to be performing unsatisfactorily by the
State’s Authorized Representative, the Grantee will receive written notification that the subrecipient can no
longer be used for this Grant Contract Agreement.
9.4 No sub agreement shall serve to terminate or in any way affect the primary legal responsibility of the Grantee
for timely and satisfactory performances of the obligations contemplated by the Grant Contract Agreement.
9.5 The Grantee must pay any subrecipient in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 16A.1245.
9.6 The Grantee and any subrecipients must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred by the
State of Minnesota or the federal government.
Page 133 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 4
10 Liability
The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or
causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the State, arising from performance of this Grant Contract
Agreement by the Grantee or the Grantee’s agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any
legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State’s failure to fulfill its obligations under this Grant Contract
Agreement.
11 State Audits
Under Minnesota Statutes § 16B.98, Subd. 8, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting
procedures and practices relevant to this Grant Contract Agreement are subject to examination by the
Commissioner of Administration, the State granting agency, the State Auditor, the Attorney General, and the
Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the expiration or termination of this Grant
Contract Agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all State
and program retention requirements, whichever is later.
12 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property Rights
12.1 Government Data Practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant
contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by
the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes § 13.08 apply to the release of
the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State.
If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately
notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting
party before the data is released. The Grantee’s response to the request shall comply with applicable law.
12.2 Intellectual Property Rights. The Grantee shall own all rights, title, and interest in all of the intellectual
property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the works and
documents. The “works” means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable),
databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings,
specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Grantee,
its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this
grant contract. “Works” includes documents. The “documents” are the originals of any databases, computer
programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes,
disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Grantee, its employees,
agents, or subcontractors, in the performance of this grant contract.
12.3 License to the State. Subject to the terms and conditions of this grant contract, the Grantee hereby grants to
the State a perpetual, irrevocable, no-fee right and license to make, have made, reproduce, modify distribute,
perform and otherwise use the works and documents for any and all purposes, in all forms and manners that
the State, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The Grantee shall upon the request of the State, execute all
papers and perform all other acts necessary, to document and secure said right and license to the works and
documents by the State. At the request of the State, the Grantee shall permit the State to inspect the original
documents and provide a copy of any of the document to the State, without cost, for use by the State in any
manner the State, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
Page 134 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 5
12.4 Obligations. Grantee represents and warrants that materials produced or used under this grant contract do
not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons or entities including but not
limited to patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade names, and service marks and names. Grantee shall
indemnify and defend the State, at Grantee’s expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to
the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of the materials infringe upon the intellectual property
rights of another. Grantee shall be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations,
liabilities, costs, and damages including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees arising out of this grant
contract, amendments and supplements thereto, which are attributable to such claims or actions.
If such a claim or action arises, or in Grantee‘s or the State’s opinion is likely to arise, Grantee shall, at the
State’s discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to continue using the materials at issue or
replace or modify the allegedly infringing materials. This remedy shall be in addition to and shall not be
exclusive to other remedies provided by law.
13 Workers Compensation
The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minnesota Statutes § 176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers’
compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees.
Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and
any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are
in no way the State’s obligation or responsibility.
14 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue
Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Grant Contract Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate
state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
15 Termination
15.1 Termination by the State.
A.Without Cause.
The State may terminate this Grant Contract Agreement without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the
Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for
services satisfactorily performed.
B.With Cause.
The State may immediately terminate this Grant Contract Agreement if the State finds that there has been a
failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress has not been made, or
that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take
action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and
requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed.
15.2 Termination by the Commissioner of Administration.
The Commissioner of Administration may immediately and unilaterally terminate this Grant Contract
Agreement if further performance under the agreement would not serve agency purposes or performance
under the Grant Contract Agreement is not in the best interest of the State.
15.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding.
Page 135 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 6
The State may immediately terminate this Grant Contract Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the
Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow
for the payment of the services addressed within this Grant Contract Agreement. Termination must be by
written notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice
and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata
basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that dedicated funds are available.
In the event of temporary lack of funding or appropriation, the State may pause its obligations under this Grant
Contract Agreement without terminating it. This pause will be for the duration of the lack of funding or
appropriation and shall not be considered a termination of the Grant Contract Agreement. The Grantee will be
notified in writing of the temporary pause, and the Grantee’s ability to provide services may be temporarily
suspended during this period. The State will provide reasonable notice to the Grantee of the lack of funding or
appropriation and shall notify the Grantee once funding is restored or appropriated, at which point the
provision of services under the Grant Contract Agreement may resume.
The State will not be assessed any penalty if the Grant Contract Agreement is terminated due to insufficient
funding. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the
State’s receiving notice.
16 Publicity and Endorsement
16.1 Publicity. Any publicity pertaining to the services resulting from this Grant Contract Agreement shall identify
the State as the sponsoring agency. Publicity includes, but is not limited to: websites, social media platforms,
notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared
by or for the Grantee or its employees individually or jointly with others or any subcontractors. All projects
primarily funded by state grant appropriations must publicly credit the State, including on the grantee’s
website, when practicable.
16.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services.
17 Data Disclosure
Under Minnesota Statutes § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of
its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification
number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the
payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state
tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax
liabilities, if any.
Exhibits
The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Grant Contract Agreement. In the event of a conflict
between the terms of this Grant Contract Agreement and its Exhibits, or between Exhibits, the order of precedence is
first the Grant Contract Agreement, and then in the following order:
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Payment Schedule
Page 136 of 397
G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025 7
Grant Contract Agreement Signature Page
State Encumbrance Verification
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as
required by Minnesota Statutes §§ 16A.15
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
SWIFT Contract No. _____________________________
City of Mendota Heights
With delegated authority
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
State Agency
With delegated authority
Print Name: ___________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________
Title: Date: ______________
Page 137 of 397
8 G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
The Grantee shall comply with all applicable grants management policies and procedures, set forth through
Minnesota Statutes § 16B.97, subd. 4 (a).
A.Project: Geothermal Planning Grant – City of Mendota Heights
B.Project Goal: The City of Mendota Heights will utilize the Geothermal Planning Grant funds to
assess the feasibility of installing a geothermal energy system at its Public Works Facility. The
assessment will include analysis and assessment of the building’s heating and cooling demand, the
equipment necessary for implementation, geologic site conditions, test well drilling, and financial
needs. The project will also include a final report with all items assessed.
C.The Grantee shall do all things necessary, including partnering with subcontractors, to complete
the following tasks according to the following schedule:
Task Description
Completion
Date
Task 1. Analysis of Heating/Cooling Demand
1.1. Select and enter into a contract with consultant to conduct tasks 1-5.
1.2. Consultant to conduct an assessment of current, past, and average annual heating and
cooling needs of the Public Works facility.
1.3. Deliverable: section of final report on analysis of the heating and cooling demand of the
building or buildings that would consume energy from the geothermal energy system
1/15/2026
Task 2. Additional Equipment Evaluation
2.1. Assessment of equipment necessary to implement the geothermal system including
appropriate sizing, as well as make and model options and how they may differ.
2.2. Deliverable: section of final report on evaluation of equipment that could be combined
with a geothermal energy system to meet the building's heating and cooling requirements
02/28/2026
Task 3. Geologic Conditions Analysis and Test Well Boring
3.1. Hire a contractor or subcontractor to perform test well boring at the Public Works Facility
site, including determining potential locations for permanent well installation.
3.2. Deliverable: section of final report on analysis of the geologic conditions of the earth in
which a geothermal energy system operates
3.3. Deliverable: test boring documentation
10/31/2026
Task 4. Financial Analysis
4.1. Consultant to create cost estimates for installation of a geothermal system including all
equipment necessary for annual heating and cooling.
4.2. Deliverable: section of final report on preparation of a financial analysis of the project.
12/31/2026
Task 5. Reporting/Invoicing (submit all reports/invoices via email by the 15th of each quarter
following work completed).
5.1. Conduct phone conferences as needed with the State’s Authorized Representative to
apprise him/her on progress accomplishments and issues encountered.
5.2. Schedule project update meetings as necessary to inform the State’s Authorized
Representative of deviations to the project schedule, the need to modify the scope of the
project or at the request of the State’s Authorized Representative to discuss any item
related to the project’s progress.
Ongoing
Page 138 of 397
9 G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025
Task Description
Completion
Date
5.3. On quarterly basis submit:
5.3.1 Status reports to the State for the preceding quarter ’s work detailing progress made
toward completing individual project tasks as well as any deviations from the project
schedule.
5.3.2 Invoices and supporting documentation to the State for the preceding quarter ’s work
completed within the project scope; and
5.3.3 Budget overview for the preceding quarter’s expenses and expenses to date using the
details in Exhibit B.
03/15/2026–
01/15/2027
5.4. Submit the Final Report, including executive summary, and a final invoice to the State upon
completion of the project. 01/15/2027
A.Promotional Materials All promotional and informational materials distributed by or for the Grantee shall contain
the following statement: “This project was made possible by a grant from the Minnesota Department of
Commerce,” unless this requirement is waived in writing by the State.
Page 139 of 397
10 G -Geothermal Planning Grants - Mendota Heights - Commerce
REV. 7.10.2025
Exhibit B: Payment Schedule
Project: Geothermal Planning Grant – City of Mendota Heights
Budget: Eligible costs include actual costs incurred for subcontractors. Other expenses may be eligible only if pre-
approved in writing by the State’s Authorized Representative.
Note: The payment schedule must match the schedule between the Grantee and Developer per the contract with the
Developer.
Category Amount
Subcontractors $130,000
Grant Award: $130,000
Total Project Cost: $ 138,360
In accordance with Minnesota Management and Budget Statewide Operating Policy 0801-01, payment shall be made
within 30 days following the State’s Authorized Representative approval of an invoice. Payments will not be made if
reports or other deliverables are outstanding.
Page 140 of 397
6.p
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-87 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the
Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
Krista Spreiter, Natural
Resources Coordinator
Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-87 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the Basin IV-P126
Improvement Project
BACKGROUND:
The City owns and maintains stormwater basin IV-P126, located west of Cherry Hill Road and
north of Farmdale Road, also known as the Cherry Hill Basin. The basin treats stormwater
runoff from the Cherry Hill 2nd Addition and Summit of Mendota Heights developments.
Council authorized staff to bid the Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project at their November 18,
2025, meeting. The proposed plan includes sediment removal, outlet improvements, rip rap,
tree removal, restoration and other appurtenant work.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Fourteen bids were received and opened on Wednesday, December 10, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. for
the Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project and are summarized below.
NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT
OF BID
Winberg Companies LLC $184,406.93
Blakeborough Hardscapes $214,228.00
Krueger Excavating Inc. $218,964.00
Page 141 of 397
Nadeau Companies $221,448.00
New Look Contracting, Inc. $235,874.50
Precision Utilities $244,286.55
Bituminous Roadways Inc. $250,226.00
Peterson Companies $264,230.65
Johnson Companies LLC $266,270.00
Minger Construction Co. Inc. $281,709.00
Kurilla Contracting $288,447.90
McNamara Contracting $328,432.00
MNL $345,180.00
Dimke Excavating, Inc. $345,942.10
Winberg Companies, LLC submitted the lowest responsible bid of $184,406.93. Their bid was
less than the Engineer's Estimate of $286,970. Winberg Companies, LLC of Shafer, Minnesota is
a contractor with many years of experience and has recently completed the Marie Park Pond
Improvements in 2024.
The Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project is a budgeted item and proposed to be financed by
the storm water utility fund. The total construction cost for the improvements is $184,406.93
which does not include indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. There
is currently over $1 million in the storm water utility fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-87 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the Basin IV-P126
Improvement Project
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive
and Responsive Government
Page 142 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-87
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE BASIN IV-P126
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the sediment removal, outlet
improvements and related appurtenant work for the Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project, bids
were received, opened, and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received
complying with said advertisement:
NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID
Winberg Companies LLC $184,406.93
Blakeborough Hardscapes $214,228.00
Krueger Excavating Inc. $218,964.00
Nadeau Companies $221,448.00
New Look Contracting, Inc. $235,874.50
Precision Utilities $244,286.55
Bituminous Roadways Inc. $250,226.00
Peterson Companies $264,230.65
Johnson Companies LLC $266,270.00
Minger Construction Co. Inc. $281,709.00
Kurilla Contracting $288,447.90
McNamara Contracting $328,432.00
MNL $345,180.00
Dimke Excavating, Inc. $345,942.10
; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommended that the lowest responsible bid
submitted by Winberg Companies, LLC, of Shafer, Minnesota, be accepted.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as
follows:
1. That the bids for the Basin IV-P126 Improvement Project are hereby received and
accepted.
2. That the bid of Winberg Companies, LLC, of Shafer, Minnesota, submitted for the
construction of the above described improvements be and the same is hereby
accepted.
3. That the contract be awarded to Winberg Companies, LLC, of Shafer, Minnesota, and
that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver
any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said
bids.
Page 143 of 397
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of December,
2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
_______________________________
ATTEST: Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
____________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 144 of 397
6.q
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-84 to Defer Street Rehabilitation Assessment at 723
Cheyenne Lane
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2025-84, deferring a portion of the street rehabilitation assessment at 723
Cheyenne Lane for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvement project.
BACKGROUND:
State statute permits the deferment of special assessments for qualifying situations, including
undeveloped property, senior citizens, individuals with permanent and total disability, military
service, and properties enrolled in the Green Acres program.
Staff has received a written request for an assessment deferment for the property associated
with 723 Cheyenne Lane as part of the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvement project. The
request was submitted by Mary Stieger, who resides at 723 Cheyenne Lane (Property ID 27-
27800-09-020). Ms. Stieger is requesting that the City Council defer a portion of the
assessment levied against her property. The amount requested to be deferred is $2,564.04.
The remaining balance of the total assessment ($5,086.04) has already been paid to the City.
The attached resolution would authorize the deferment of the outstanding assessment
amount for this property. If approved, the deferred assessment will be recorded with Dakota
County and remain with the property.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The City will carry the special assessment until the title of the property transfers to a new
owner, or the assessment paid.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-84 Deferring the Making of Assessment for the Property Located at 723
Cheyenne Lane (PID 27-27800-09-020) For the Friendly Hills Neigh
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Page 145 of 397
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 146 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNEOSTA
RESOLUTION 2025-84
DEFERRING THE MAKING OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
723 CHEYENNE LANE (PID 27-27800-09-020) FOR THE FRIENDLY HILLS
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the Public Works Director, has calculated the
proper amount to be specially assessed for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the assessment roll for said improvements has been filed with the City Clerk and at
all times since its filing has been open to public inspection; and
WHEREAS, a hearing on said assessments was duly held at 6:00 p.m. on October 21, 2025, at
the City Hall in the City of Mendota Heights, MN and;
WHEREAS, Ms. Mary Stieger, is the owner of certain property more particularly described as
Parcel No. 27-27800-09-020 the legal description of which is described as the following situated in
Dakota County, Minnesota;
Lot 2, Block 9, Friendly Hills Rearr, Dakota County, Minnesota, Section 36, Township 28, Range 23
WHEREAS, Mary Stieger has requested that the making of an assessment against said property
by reason of senior citizenship be deferred until such time as the assessment term has expired, the
property is sold, or otherwise transferred in title ownership.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1.That the assessment roll for said improvements be corrected to defer the making of an
assessment at this time against the property of Ms. Mary Stieger (parcel no. 27-27800-09-
020)for the street rehabilitation improvements.
2.That upon the future sale of title transfer of said property there shall be levied an assessment
in the principal amount of $2,564.04, plus interest at the rate of 4.99% per annum from
October 21, 2025.
3.That the City Clerk is hereby directed to correct the assessment roll for said improvements as
set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 16th day of December 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
_______________________________
ATTEST: Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
____________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 147 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
6.r
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-91 Accepting Work and Final Payment for Emerson
Avenue Street Improvements Project 202306
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-91, to accept the work and approve the final payment for the Emerson
Avenue Street Improvements.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council awarded the contract to Ryan Contracting Co at their April 16, 2024, City
Council meeting for the low bid of $4,199,549.00. The contract work for the project has been
completed, inspected, and approved. The project is ready for final payment. This will start the
one-year guarantee period. All required paperwork needed before the final payment can be
issued has been submitted.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The project costs were funded by Special Assessments, Municipal Bonds, Saint Paul Regional
Water Services Funds, and Utility Funds. The final payment for this contract is $171,199.94
including retainage. The total construction costs for the project were $4,059,953.94.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-91 Accepting Work and Final Payment for Emerson Avenue Street
Improvements Project 202306
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 148 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-91
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE
EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT 202306
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Mendota Heights on April 16,
2024, with Ryan Contracting Co of Elko New Market, MN, has satisfactorily completed the
improvements for the Emerson Avenue Street Improvements Project #202306, in accordance with
such contract; and
WHEREAS, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the work completed under said contract
is hereby accepted and approved; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $171,199.94,
taking the contractor’s receipt in full.
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this sixteenth day of December, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
______________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 149 of 397
Page 150 of 3976.s
Page 151 of 397
Page 152 of 397
Page 153 of 397
Page 154 of 397
Page 155 of 397
Page 156 of 397
Page 157 of 397
Page 158 of 397
Page 159 of 397
Page 160 of 397
Page 161 of 397
Page 162 of 397
Page 163 of 397
Page 164 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
8.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: 2026 Fee Schedule
ITEM TYPE: Public Hearing
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Hold a public hearing for Ordinance 604 which would adopt the 2026 Fee Schedule. Following
the public hearing, the City Council is asked to adopt Ordinance 604 amending the 2025 fee
schedule, and approve the summary publication for the Ordinance.
Approval of the ordinance requires a simple majority vote of the Council.
Approval of the summary publication of the ordinance requires a 4/5th vote of the Council.
BACKGROUND:
Per Minnesota Statutes 462.353, sub. 4, the adoption of a fee schedule requires a public
hearing to allow citizen input. The public hearing was published on December 2, 2025, in the
newspaper, notice was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and notice posted on the city’s
website.
Fees are reviewed annually by staff to ensure the rate structures reflect the cost of services
provided. Fee schedule changes are proposed by the department charging the fee.
The proposed changes for 2026 include donations as set in the Parks and Recreation Donation
Policy and updates to fees for the Par 3 Community Golf Course.
Page 165 of 397
A copy of the proposed fee schedule is attached which shows the proposed changes made for
2026 highlighted in red.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The 2026 budget includes revenues from the 2025 fee schedule. The proposed revisions will
provide additional revenue for 2026.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Proposed Ordinance 604
2.Summary Publication of Ordinance 604
3.2026 Proposed Fee Schedule
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive
and Responsive Government
Page 166 of 397
ORDINANCE NO. 604
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FEE SCHEDULE
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain:
Section 1.
Policy and Purpose. By the enactment of this Ordinance, the City Council intends to
establish fees and charges required by the City Code and to comply with Minnesota
Statues 462.353, subd. 4.
Fees and Charges. The fees and charges for the City for the year 2026 are set forth in
“Exhibit A” hereto attached.
Application. Where a direct conflict exists between the amount of a fee or charge set by
any provisions of the City Code and a fee or charge set by this Ordinance, the fee or charge
set by the Ordinance applies.
Section 2.
This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this 16th day of December 2026.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST
____________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 167 of 397
Summary Publication
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
Ordinance 604
An Ordinance Amending the Fee Schedule for Services in 2026
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby establish fees
and charges required by the City Code for the year 2026, and to comply with Minnesota
Statue 463.353, subd. 4.
The complete text of this ordinance is available at city hall or www.mendotaheightsmn.gov
Adopted on the 16th day of December 2026.
CITY COUNCIL OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
/s/Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
Attest:
/s/Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 168 of 397
Exhibit A
ADMINISTRATION Guidance 2026 Proposed Fee 2025 Fees
Assessment Search no change $ 15 / search
Certification of Delinquent Sewer Accounts Per City Code 10-3-7, B.2.no change $ 50 / per certification
Plus 7% Interest
City Ordinance Book no change $ 75 / book
Comprehensive Plan no change $ 50 / Complete; $ 30 / One
Volume
Election Filing Fee Per MN Statutes 205.13 (3)no change $ 5
Mailing Costs no change Actual or $1 / minimum
Notary Public Residents, businesses, license applicants only no change No charge
Returned Checks no change $ 30 /check
TIF / Abatement Application Fee no change $ 1,200
Photo Copies 1 to 100 pages no change $ .25 / single sided page
Photo Copies 101+ pages or data stored electronically no change
$ .25 / single sided plus actual cost
for search, retrieve, copy
transmit/device
Public Data - stored electronically MS 13 no change
$ .00 to review info at city hall;
$.25 per single sided copy; $30 /
hour actual cost for search, retrieve,
copy, transmit
Electronic Storage Device USB/CD/DVD -
8.5 GB Audio, video, images no change Actual cost for search, retrieve,
copy and device
Intoxicating Liquor Off Sale limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 3. a.(3)no change $ 150
Intoxicating Liquor On-Sale Tier 1 Tier 1 license defined in Code 3-1-12. B.no change $ 10,000
Intoxicating Liquor On-Sale Tier 2 Tier 2 license defined in Code 3-1-12. B.no change $ 7,500
Intoxicating Liquor On-Sale Hotel Limited Service Hotel no change $ 3,000
Club Liquor On-Sale limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.b.no change $ 350 (for 201-500 club members)
$ 300 (under 200 members)
Sunday Liquor limited by SS 340A.504 no change $ 200
Wine On-Sale limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.c.no change $ 2,000
Wine On-Sale Institutional limited by SS 340A.408 Subd. 2.c.no change $ 250
Malt Liquor Licenses
Malt Liquor Off Sale (3.2%)no change $ 50
Malt Liquor On Sale (3.2%)no change $ 250
City of Mendota Heights
Fee Schedule
12/16/2025
Data Requests: the City adheres to MN Data Practices Act, MN Statutes Chap 13
Intoxicating Liquor Licenes
*note actual cost charged in 15 minute increments
Page 1
Page 169 of 397
ADMINISTRATION (cont.)Guidance 2026 Proposed Fee 2025 Fees
Temporary On Sale Intoxicating Liquor,
Malt Liquor, Wine
Issued only to clubs, non-profits, religious
organizations no change $ 50 / one to four day license
Malt Liquor Investigation Renewal no change $ 100 / per establishment
Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, 3.2 Malt
Liquor Application Investigation New Licensees
Limited by SS 340A.412 Subd. 2 no change
$ 500 / per establishment
(additional charges if investigation
needs to go out of state, then actual
costs charged, up to $10,000)
First Violation within a 3 year rolling time period no change $ 500 fine
Second Violation within a 3 year rolling time period no change $ 750 fine + 3 day suspension of
license
Third Violation within a 3 year rolling time period no change $ 1,500 fine + 10 day suspension of
license
Fourth Violation within a 3 year rolling time period no change Revocation: minimum of 1 year
from revocation date
Chicken Coop Permit New no change $ 15 / coop
Food Truck Permit
Public events public property; city code
requires I-industrial zoning district only or
1x/year special event in any zoning district
no change $0
Food Truck Permit - Deposit Fee (Ord 601 4/2025)$ 50 per city event
Garbage/Waste Hauler code 4-3-3 no change $ 75 + $ 10/truck
Goat Grazing Permit Allows for 3 grazing permits per calendar yr.,
each permit not to exceed 30 days no change $ 100 / year
Massage Therapist License New licensee or renewal no change $ 50
Massage Therapist License Investigation New licensee or renewal no change $ 50
Massage Therapy Establishment/Enterprise
License New licensee or renewal no change $ 100
Massage Therapy Enterprise License
Investigation New licensee or renewal no change $ 100
Rental - Short-Term License New licensee or renewal no change $200 / annual
Tobacco License City Code 3-2-4. Fee not prorated no change $ 200 / annual
Tobacco Investigation Fee New or Renewal no change $ 100 per establishment
Tobacco Violations Pursuant to MN SS 461.12, (2)no change Pursuant to MN SS 461.12, (2)
Transient Merchant License City Code 3-3;
Issued for one 14-consecutive day period, per year no change $ 100 per vendor
Initial Registration (includes first renewal) Sec 3-8-4C.1 no change $ 500.00
Renewal Registration (beginning with second
renewal)Sec 3-8-4C.1 no change $ 1,000.00
Lower-potency Hemp Edible Retail Business
Registration Sec 3-8-4C.1 no change $ 125.00
First Violation Sec. 3-8-4E.4a no change $ 1,000.00
Second Violation at same location within five
years of the first violation Sec. 3-8-4E.4a no change $ 1,250.00
Third violation at same location within five
years of the first violation Sec. 3-8-4E.4a no change $ 2,000.00
Fourth violation at same location within five
years of the first violation Sec. 3-8-4E.4a no change $ 2,000.00
Retail sale without a retail registration Sec. 3-8-4A.2 no change $ 2,000.00
Temporary On Sale Liquor Licenses
Liquor Application Investigation Fee
Liquor License Violation
Permits/Licenses
Registration Fee for Cannabis or Lower-Potency Hemp Retail Business
Cannabis Retail Business Penalties
Page 2
Page 170 of 397
BUILDING PERMITS Guidance 2026 Propoposed Fee 2025 Fees
Building Moving Permit no change $ 75
Building Permit Fee Residential/Commercial no change Per Attachment A
Demolition Permit no change Per Attachment A
Mechanical Permit Commercial Per Attachment A + Plan Review
Fee
Mechanical Permit Residential no change 1% of value/$ 75 minimum
Plan Review Fee Residential or Commercial no change
Per Attachment A
Exceptions ($50 fee): Decks,
Basement Finishes, Kitchen
Remodel, Bathroom Remodel, and
similar projects.
Plumbing Permit Commercial no change Per Attachment A + Plan Review
Fee
Plumbing Permit Residential no change 1% of value /$ 75 minimum
Pool Permit - above ground no change $ 25
Roofing Permit Commercial no change 1% of value, $100 minimum,
$1,000 maximum
Roofing and/or Siding Permit Residential no change 1% of value / $100 minimum
Sewer Permit Residential/Commercial no change $ 75
Window/Door Permit Residential no change 1% of value / $75 minimum
CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTIONS
Initial Inspection Sec. 9-6-1(A)no change No Fee
First re-inspection Sec. 9-6-1(A)no change $ 100.00 (no charge if resolved
after first inspection)
Second re-inspection Sec. 9-6-1(A)no change $ 150
Any Subsequent Inspections Sec. 9-6-1(A)no change $ 150
Page 3
Page 171 of 397
ENGINEERING Guidance 2026 Proposed Fee 2025 Fees
Driveway Permit Replacement no change $ 50
Driveway Permit New or Expanded no change $ 100
Engineering and Drafting Services no change Actual costs plus staff time
Feasibility Report
Credit shall be given for information which
can be used in plan and specification
preparation
no change Actual costs plus staff time
Field Inspection and Staking no change Actual costs plus staff time
Grading Permit no change $ 200 + $ 500 escrow
Stormwater Management Permit - Escrow
Only no change
$ 2,000 or amount equal to 125%
of estimated cost to accomplish
compliance with approved storm
water management permit,
whichever is greater
Litigation no change Actual costs plus staff time
Miscellaneous Charges no change Actual costs plus staff time
Plans and Specifications Project Construction under $100,000 no change Actual costs plus staff time
Plans and Specifications Project Construction over $100,000 no change 7% of final contract amount
Preliminary Studies no change Actual costs plus staff time
Professional Services on Planning Cases no change
1st hour per case included /
thereafter actual costs plus staff
time
Public Right of Way General Excavation
Permit no change $ 200 / flat fee
Public Right of Way Utility Permit Commercial no change
$ 200 / first 1000 feet
$ 25 / each additional 100 feet
$ 75 / winter surcharge fee (11/1 -
3/31)
Public Right of Way Permit Residential no change $ 50 / flat fee
Right-Of-Way Usage license no change $ 350
Tree Replacement Requirement Escrow Title 15 -3-6
$100 per caliper inch of required
caliper inches to be replaced or
$250 per tree when 1:1 replacement
is required
Vacation - ROW or Easement no change $ 500
Electronic Storage Device USB/CD/DVD of
Data or Maps no change $ 10 plus map fee
Up to 11 x 17
Black and White no change $ 3
Up to 11 x 17
Color no change $ 10
Greater than 11 x 17
Black and White no change $ 6
Greater than 11 x 17
Color no change $ 20
Maps/Plans/Drawings:
Comprehensive Plan
Critical Area
GIS
Land Use
Plats
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer, Street Asbuilts, Wetlands
Zoning
*Note: Staff time is computed on the basis of 250% of the employee's hourly rate for the above services
Page 4
Page 172 of 397
PARKS AND RECREATION Guidance 2026 Proposed Fee 2025 Fees
Application Fee
Charged per permit season for all field/
facility, permit application reservations. Due
upon application. Non-refundable
no change $ 25
Concessions Building Reservation Must provide proof of Food/Beverage License no change $ 25 per event per day
Priority Level 3 no change $ 7 per player per season
Priority Level 4 no change $ 10 per player per season
Priority Level 5 no change $ 10 per hour per field
Priority Level 6 & 7 no change $ 15 per hour per field
Field Reservation and Prep Fee for
Tournaments
Baseball/Softball/Soccer/Football/Lacrosse
Priority Level 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (Ord 601 4/2025)no change $41.50 per day/per field
Field Preparation Non-Tournament Use no change $ 35 per field per day
Tournament Use - Required for Priority Levels
3 and 4 no change $ 35 per field per day
Tournament Use - Optional for Priority Levels
5, 6, and 7 no change $ 35 per field per day
Par 3 Footgolf Fees $ 9 per round $ 8 per round
Par 3 Greens Fees Juniors/Seniors/Veterans-Weekday $ 15 per round $ 14 per round
Juniors/Seniors/Veterans-Weekend $ 17 per round $ 16 per round
Weekday $ 16 per round $ 15 per round
Weekend or Holiday $ 18 per round $ 17 per round
Par 3 10-Round Pass no change $ 125 per pass
Par 3 Senior Pass Age 65 and over
Does not include golf cart no change $ 200 per year
Par 3 Pull Cart Rental $ 5 per round $ 4 per round
Par 3 Power Cart Rental $ 14 per round $ 12 per round
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITY RESERVATATION
Priority Level 3 no change $ 4 per hour per rink
Priority Level 4 no change $ 6 per hour per rink
Priority Level 5 no change $ 4 per hour per rink
Priority Level 6 and 7 no change $ 8 per hour per rink
Tennis Court Reservations no change $ 5 per hour
Picnic Area/Shelter Resident - Private no change $ 25
Picnic Area/Shelter Non-Resident - Private no change $ 75
Picnic Area/Shelter Resident - Business no change $ 75
Picnic Area/Shelter Non-Resident - Business no change $ 175
Picnic Table Additional On-site no change $ 15/day
Canoe Rack Rental Canoe Storage @Rogers Lake Park during
summer months no change $ 50 per summer
Park Bench Donation no change $1,500
Tree Donation Parks and Rec Donation Policy New $ 200
Picnic Tables Parks and Rec Donation Policy New $ 900
Little Free Library Parks and Rec Donation Policy New $ 800
NOTE: Mendota Heights schools, city events, and non-profit civic organizations are fee exempt for Picnic Area/Shelter rental fees.
Field Preparation
Ice Rink Reservation
PAR 3 COMMUNITY GOLF COURSE
Field Reservation
Baseball/Softball/Soccer/Football/Lacrosse
Page 5
Page 173 of 397
PLANNING Guideance 20206 Proposed Fees 2025 Fees
Accessory Structure Permit For structures not requiring building permit no change $25
After-the-Fact Permit For actions without appropriate zoning permits no change Double fee, or $ 250, whichever is
greater
Appeal to Board of Zoning Appeals no change $ 250 + $ 500 escrow
Comprehensive Plan Amendment no change $ 750 + $ 500 escrow
Concept Plan Review for PUD/Plat no change $ 250 + $ 500 escrow
Conditional Use Permit / Interim Use Permit Residential no change $ 350 + $ 500 escrow
Conditional Use Permit / Interim Use Permit Commercial/Industrial no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow
MRCCA Permit no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow +
Security deposit determined by staff
MRCCA Permit-Administrative no change $ 200 + Security deposit determined
by staff
CUP for PUD no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow
Fence Permit no change $ 25
Lot Split / Lot Line Adjustment no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow
Mining Permit no change $ 350 + $ 500 escrow
Park Dedication Fee Single & Multi-Family Residential no change $ 4,000/ dwelling unit
Park Dedication Fee New Commercial / Industrial Lot no change
10% assessed value of unimproved
land determined by County
Assessor
Rezoning no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow
Preliminary/Final Plat no change $ 750 + escrow amount
Sign Permit Triple fee charged if sign erected w/o permit;
per Code 12-1D-15 B2 no change
Per Attachment A; 3x (triple) fee
changed if sign erected without
permit; Code 12-1D-15 B2
Temporary Sign Permit no change $ 25
Variance Residential no change $ 300 + $ 500 escrow
Variance Commercial or Industrial no change $ 500 + $ 500 escrow
Wetlands Permit $500 + $500 escrow and/or security
deposit determined by staff
Wetlands Permit - Administrative Per City Code 12-2-6.6.$100 + Security deposit determined
by staff
Zoning Letter no change $50
Zoning Ordinance Amendment no change $ 250 + $ 500 escrow
Residential districts - 0 to 10 units no change $ 100/unit, $ 250 minimum
Res Districts, MR-PUD, HR-PUD districts-
over 10 units no change $ 50/unit
Commercial/Industrial Districts, MU-PUD no change $ 1,500
Expenses billed to city charged against escrow. Remaining escrow returned to applicant. Applicants billed for city incurred expenses exceeding escrow.
Escrow Table
Page 6
Page 174 of 397
PUBLIC SAFETY Guidance 2026 Proposed Fees 20025 Fees
Fingerprints no change $ 20/card
Local Record Check w/Clearance Letter Includes Clearance Letter no change $ 15
Certified Copy of Police Data no change $ 15
Dangerous Dog Registration City Code 5-3-4. D.;
Limited by SS 347.51 subd. 2(3)no change $ 500
False Alarm, Police Per calendar year no change
First three no charge,
4th-$50;
5th-$75;
6th and ea. add'l - $ 100
False Alarm, Fire Per calendar year no change 1st and 2nd = no charge,
3rd and ea. add'l - $ 150/ea.
Fire Alarm Permit Commercial no change Per Attachment A
Removal of Underground Fuel Tanks Residential/Commercial no change $ 50 minimum
Plan Review Fee no change Per Attachment A
Fire Sprinkler Alteration no change Per Attachment A
Day Care Fire Inspection Per MN Statutes 299F.011 no change $ 50
Copy of Incident Report no change $ .25/page up to 100 pages
Copy of Accident Report In-person, Involved party request no change $ .25/page up to 100 pages
Copy of Accident Report - insurance or
attorney request
Per MN Dept. of Admin/Data Practices and
M.S. Chapter 13.82 must prove involvement
in relationship to accident and either present
ID or a signed release
no change
Self-addressed, stamped envelope
with signed release. If over 4 pgs.,
contact requestor for alt. payment.
911 Audio Transcription/or other
transcriptions Per M.S. 13.82 subd. 4 no change Actual cost with $30.00 deposit
Public Data - stored electronically MS 13 no change Actual cost for search, retrieve,
copy and transmit
USB/CD/DVD/Electronic Storage Device -
Per 8.5 GB MS 13 no change Actual cost for search, retrieve,
copy and device
Monthly email of public data for accident
reports no change $ 60/month
*Note actual cost charged in 15-minute increments
Data Requests: the City adheres to MN Data Practices Act, MN Statutes Chap 13
Page 7
Page 175 of 397
Valuation
$1.00 to $500
$501 to $2,000
$2,001 to $25,000
$25,001 to $50,000
$50,001 to $100,000
$100,001 to $500,000
$500,001 to $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and greater
Plan Review Fee = 65% of the building permit fee by valuation
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS "ATTACHMENT A" FOR BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Permit Fees
State Surcharge = .0005 x Valuation
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) $2,485/unit
Note: Unit & SAC fee determined by Metropolitan Council; may be added to city building permit fee
$25.00
$25.00 for the first $500 plus $3.25 for each additional $100 or
fraction thereof, to and including $2000
$73.75 for the first $2,000 plus $14.75 for each additional $1,000 or
fraction thereof, to and including $25,000
$413.00 for the first $25,000 plus $10.75 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000
$681.75 for the first $50,000 plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000,
or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000
$1,056.75 for the first $100,000 plus $6.00 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000
$3,456.75 for the first $500,000 plus $5.00 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000
$5,956.75 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.00 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof
Page 8
Page 176 of 397
8.b
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-89 Public Hearing on Municipal Consent for the Sibley
Memorial Highway Improvement and Turnback
ITEM TYPE: Public Hearing
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
The Minnesota State Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning on rehabilitating
Sibley Memorial Highway in advance of a turnback to the City. As part of the design process,
MnDOT needs to ask for local government approval of the sixty percent design plans.
BACKGROUND:
The project is being developed to improve multiple aspects of Sibley Memorial Highway. The
pavement structure will be restored and the ride smoothness increased by grading and a
bituminous mill and overlay. Pedestrian safety and ADA improvements will be made by
updating infrastructure to meet current ADA guidelines. Drainage infrastructure will be
improved by repairing or replacing deficient infrastructure.
In order to properly request local government approval, there needs to be a Public Hearing
before the local governmental body; in this case, the Mendota Heights City Council. Municipal
Consent is required due to the turnback of the roadway including right-of-way, easements,
and the road itself.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
No budget impact other than staff time to prepare and publish the meeting notice.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Res 2025- 89 Approve Municipal Consent For MnDOT Sibley Memorial Highway
Rehabilitation Project
2.MN Statutes 161.162-161.167
3.Sixty Percent Construction Plans
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship
Page 177 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-89
RESOLUTION APPROVING MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR
THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIBLEY MEMORIAL
HIGHWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared sixty percent plans for
State Project 1901-195 on Sibley Memorial Highway, from Highway 13 to Highway 13 within
the City of Mendota Heights for grading, bituminous mill and overlay, and ADA improvements
and signal revision; and seeks the approval thereof, as described in Minnesota Statutes 161.162
to 161.167; and
WHEREAS, said sixty percent (60%) plans are on file in the Metro District Minnesota
Department of Transportation office, Roseville, Minnesota, being marked as sixty percent (60%)
plans, S.P. 1901-195, from R.P. 11+34 to 82+29; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said final layout for the improvement
of said 1901-195 on Sibley Memorial Highway within the corporate limits be and is hereby
approved.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on this sixteenth day of December,
2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
________________________________
ATTEST Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I HERBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to
and adopted by the City of Mendota Heights, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, at a duly
authorized City Council meeting held in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, on the 16th day
of December, 2025, as disclosed by the records of said City on file and of record in the office.
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 178 of 397
Page 179 of 397
Page 180 of 397
Page 181 of 397
Page 182 of 397
Page 183 of 397
Page 184 of 397
Page 185 of 397
Lake
Lake
LAKEVIEW
AVE.DR.NORTHLAND
DR.
MENDOTA
NORTHLAND DR.PILOTKNOBRD.13
31
ENTERP
R
IS
E
55
DR.HIGHWAY13COMMERCE
E CE
DR.103WATER'SDR.CIR.110 JUPITERDR.R
COMM
113
113ACACIA DR.ACACIAL
A
K
E
AU
DR.LEMA
YD
R
.
Maint.VALENCOURBLVD.ST.WINDY
110
116
Augusta
KENDON AVE.
FURLONG AVE.
VICTORY AVE.COUNTYGun Club
Lake
FO R T SN ELLING OLDMEMORIALSIBLEYHIGHWAYMinnesota
COUNTYUnionPacificR.R.LeMay
LE
MAY
G
US
T
AL
AKECEGDIRRiver
STA TE H ISTO R ICA L PA R K
120
CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR
LOCATED ON FROM TO
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE PROJ. NO.
GROSS LENGTH
BRIDGES-LENGTH
EXCEPTIONS-LENGTH
NET LENGTH
FEET
FEET
FEET
FEET
MILES
MILES
MILES
MILES
REF. POINT TO REF. POINT
1901-195
DISTRICT
COUNTY
PROJECT LOCATION
:
:
Design Speed MPH
DHV (Design Hr. Vol.)
D (Directional Distr.)
T (Heavy Commercial)%
%
Based on Sight Distance
Height of eye Height of object
Design Speed not achieved at:
STA.TO STA.MPH
STA.TO STA.MPH
DESIGN DESIGNATION
Design ESALS
METRO
DAKOTA
3.5'2.0'
AADT (Current Year)
AADT (Future Year)
STOPPING
INDEX MAP
SCALE
50'PLAN
FED. PROJ. NO.
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS
"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN.
THE 2025 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS
LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
PRINT NAME:
DATE:
LICENSE #
SIGNATURE:
DESIGN SQUAD
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ENGINEER
20
BEGIN SP 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA 11+34
END SP 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA 82+29
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
GRADING, BITUMINOUS MILL AND OVERLAY, ADA IMPROVEMENTS, AND SIGNAL REVISION
INP. BR. 19088
INP. BR. 19087
CHARGE IDENTIFIERSTATE PROJ. NO.
1901-195
7095.00 1.344
1600'
DIRECTOR, LAND MANAGEMENT
OFFICE OF LAND MANAGEMENT APPROVAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY S. JUNCTION WITH TH 13 N. JUNCTION WITH TH 13
STBG XXXX
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA 25421
MARLAND STANLEY, TONY SOFIE
26-AUG-2025
INP. BR. 97680
7095.00 1.344
089+00.265 090+00.615
HENNEPIN
DAKOTA
TH 13 RP 106+00.347
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
AND STANDARD PLANS
SOILS, CONSTRUCTION NOTES, STANDARD PLATES
5
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES4-3
GENERAL LAYOUT2
TITLE SHEET1
DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO.
INDEX
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_100tsh.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_100tsh26-AUG-20251
TOTAL SHEETS ????
SP 1901 - 195
(TH 13=117)
SHEET NO
TITTLE SHEET
50
WARNING:
HIGH PRESSURE GAS PIPELINE
Page 186 of 397
Type 4
Wetland #1
Type 2
Wetland #2
COE Wetland
Ditch #1 COE Wetland
Ditch #2
COE Wetland
Ditch #3
COE Wetland
Ditch #4
CONSTRUCTION
UNDER
AREACONCRETE F
UEL TANKS (4)C ST.C ST.COMMERCE DR.UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?
?
?
?
?
?FFFFFFUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
??
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?UMHUMHD ST2nd STMMMMMMMMMMMI
NP R/WINP R/W
INP R/W
I
NP R/
W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
I
NP R/
W
I
NP R/WIN
P
R
/W
INP R/WI
NP R/WI
NP
R/WINP R/
WPERRON RD WTRAIL
TRAIL
TRAIL
TRAIL
TRAI
LTRAILT.H.13T.H.13T.H.
13T.H.13T.
H.13
T.H.13
T.H. 13
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_105gel.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_105gel26-AUG-20252
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
GENERAL LAYOUT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
SHEET 1 OF 10 SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEET 3 OF 10 SHEET 4 OF 10
SHEET 5 OF 10
SHEET 6 OF 10
SH
EE
T 7 O
F 10S
HEET 8 OF 10 SHEE
T 9 OF 10SHEET 10 OF 10
CONSTRUCTION AREA
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
INPLACE BRIDGE NUMBERXXXXX
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY STA. 11+34
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY STA. 82+29
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
(XXXXXX)
((XXXXXX))
DAKOTA COUNTY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
(XXXX)
((XXXX))
19087
19088
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM WORK
500
SCALE IN FEET
10152025
30
35
40 45
50
5
5
606
5 7075
80
Page 187 of 397
1 OF 3
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_110est.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_110est26-AUG-20253
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 188 of 397
2 OF 3
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_110est.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_110est26-AUG-20254
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 189 of 397
3 OF 3
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_110est.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_110est26-AUG-20255
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 190 of 397
HAVE FACILITIES IN THE AREA. CONTACT MUST BE MADE THROUGH GOPHER STATE ONE CALL.
THIS IS A REMINDER THAT UNDER STATE LAW IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY
PROVIDE A SAW CUT WHERE PLACING NEW PAVEMENT NEXT TO IN-PLACE PAVEMENT TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT.
SUCH THAT THE GRANULAR MATERIAL OVERLAYS THE ADJACENT NON-GRANULAR SOIL.
BETWEEN THE CHANGE IN MATERIAL TO PREVENT AN ABRUPT SOILS DIFFERENTIAL. CONSTRUCT THE 1:20 (V:H) TRANSITION
IN ANY CASE WHERE GRANULAR EMBANKMENTS JOIN NON-GRANULAR SOIL EMBANKMENTS, PROVIDE A 1:20 (V:H) TRANSITION
PAID FOR AS EXCAVATION - COMMON AND PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL IS PAID FOR AS COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV).
STRIP ALL SOD AND TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION AND REUSE AS TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL STRIPPING IS
SOILS AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SURFACE AND THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION.
WITH POINTS ESTABLISHED BY PROJECTING 1(V):2(H) OR GREATER (FLATTER) SLOPE BETWEEN THE EDGE OF THE TRAFFIC
DELINEATED TO KEEP VEHICLES A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE ADJACENT EXCAVATION. THE DELINEATION SHOULD COINCIDE
AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE FROM A SOILS STANDPOINT, TRAFFIC LANES TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE
BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE R/W IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2104.
ANY MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND
6.
PLANS AND/OR PLATES AS APPROPRIATE FOR USE ON THE PROJECT.
THE CERTIFICATION ON THIS SHEET SIGNIFIES THE ENGINEER SELECTED THE STANDARD
THE LISTED STANDARD PLATES ARE INCORPORATED REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN SET.
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_115scn.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_125scn26-AUG-20256
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195STATE PROJ. NO.
TRUNK HWY.(TH 13)
SHEET NO.
PLATES AND STANDARD PLANS
SOILS & CONSTRUCTION NOTES, STANDARD
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 191 of 397
1 OF 3
ADA
TRAFFIC BARRIER
SURFACING
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_130tabs.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_130tabs26-AUG-20257
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
TABULATIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 192 of 397
2 OF 3
TURF ESTABLISHMENT
EROSION CONTROL
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_130tabs.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_130tabs26-AUG-20258
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
TABULATIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 193 of 397
1 OF 3
GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:
- ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE DONE BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
- ONLY IMPACTED UTILITIES ARE TABULATED. NO OTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES ARE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT.
INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING EXISTING UTILITIES.
WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-22, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR
- THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL
- ALL POWER LINES ARE DISTRIBUTION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-20259
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE UTILITY INFORMATION
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 194 of 397
2 OF 3
WATER
POWER
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202510
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE UTILITY INFORMATION
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 195 of 397
3 OF 3
GAS
SANITARY SEWER
PETROLEUM
COMMUNICATIONS
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202511
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE UTILITY INFORMATION
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 196 of 397
SHALL BE 7%
3. MAXIMUM SHOULDER SUPERELEVATION ROLLOVER
2. FOR VARIABLE SIDE SLOPES, SEE THE CROSS SECTIONS
1. ALL CROSS SLOPES ARE IN FOOT PER FOOT
GENERAL NOTES:
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
INSET A
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
{
STA. 30+80 TO STA. 68+70
STA. 17+02 TO STA. 26+36
STA. 12+90 TO STA. 13+91
AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 1
1.5' TO PI
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
5
1.5' TO PI
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
SAWCUTSAWCUT5
INSET A
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)
10'-12'
VAR. SHLD
13'14'
THRU LANE THRU LANE
10'-12'
VAR. SHLD
TH 13
INSET B
3 PAID FOR AS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
2'2'
6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5
PLACE IN 3 LIFTS, 3",2",2"
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
INSET BINSET B
4 6" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
{
STA. 11+34 TO STA. 12+90
1.5' TO PI
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
5
1.5' TO PI
SAWCUTSAWCUT5
INSET A
18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)
18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)
12'
RTL
13'14'
THRU LANE THRU LANE
10'-12'
VAR. SHLD
TH 13
2'2'
INSET BINSET B
5'
(INP)
SIDEWALK
18"
7"
1/2"R
3/4" PER FT
SLOPE:
FACE OF CURB
1/2"R
7"
CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB) DETAIL 3
4
17" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
1 2
5 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 1
9'
1 2
EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
PLACE IN 2 EQUAL LIFTS
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
INSET A
BLVD
1 18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB) OUTSIDE OF EXISTING SHOULDER PAVEMENT
NOTE:
2 SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
INSET A
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
{
STA. 13+91 TO STA. 17+02
1.5' TO PI
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
5
1.5' TO PI
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
SAWCUTSAWCUT5
INSET A
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)
12'
RTL (INP)
13'14'
THRU LANE THRU LANE
10'-12'
VAR. SHLD
TH 13
2'2'
INSET BINSET B
INSET B
1 212 1 212
1 2 1 2SAWCUTINSET A
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_145typ.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_145typ26-AUG-202512
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
TYPICAL SECTIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 OF 2
Page 197 of 397
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING
MATCH
EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (4.0")
PLACE IN 2 EQUAL LIFTS
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
INSET C
INSET A
EXISTING
MATCH
{
STA. 26+36 TO STA. 30+80
{
STA. 68+70 TO STA. 82+29
1 18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB) OUTSIDE OF EXISTING SHOULDER PAVEMENT
NOTE:
3
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
INSET A
1.5' TO PI
3
6" MIN. TOPSOIL
SAWCUTSAWCUT0.02%
INPLACE GROUNDLINE
18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (RIBBON CURB)
5'-15'
VAR. SHLD
1.5' TO PI12'
THRU LANE
12'
THRU LANE
4'
SHLD
4'-6'
VAR. SHLD
12'
THRU LANE
TH 13
TH 13
2 SEE DETAIL ON SHEET XX
2'2'
INSET B INSET B
EXISTING
MATCH
0.02%
4'-6'
VAR. SHLD
12'
THRU LANE
INSET CINSET C
INSET C INSET C
SHALL BE 7%
3. MAXIMUM SHOULDER SUPERELEVATION ROLLOVER
2. FOR VARIABLE SIDE SLOPES, SEE THE CROSS SECTIONS
1. ALL CROSS SLOPES ARE IN FOOT PER FOOT
GENERAL NOTES:
1 212 1 212
INPLACE GROUNDLINE INPLACE GROUNDLINE
INPLACE B424 C&G INPLACE B424 C&G
3 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 1
AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 1
INSET B
6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5
PLACE IN 3 LIFTS, 3",2",2"
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
17" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
PLACE IN 2 EQUAL LIFTS
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
INSET A
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_145typ.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_145typ26-AUG-202513
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
TYPICAL SECTIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 OF 2
Page 198 of 397
DRAINAGE OPEN CUT DETAIL
FOR CENTERLINE CROSSING (TRANSVERSE) PIPES AND DRIVEWAY CROSSING (PARALLEL PIPES)
(TYP.)
AREA
HAUNCH
PIPE PLACEMENT
ANY MEANS PRIOR TO
DO NOT COMPACT BY
BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1.
6" MIN. FINE AGGREGATE
COMPACT PER SPEC. 2106.
BEDDING PER SPEC. 3149.2.G.1.
FINE AGGREGATE 1:1 1/21:1 1/2
17" SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)
6.0" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5
TOP OF FINISHED SURFACE
2 FT. OF PIPE IS 3".
MAXIMUM EMBANKMENT PARTICLE SIZE WITHIN
SELECT GRADING MATERIAL PER SPEC. 2106.1.A.6.
SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH)SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH)
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE 2
3
STA. 24+84 TO STA. 24+96
NOTES:
1
DRIVEWAY AT HUDSON COMPANY. PLACE IN 3 LIFTS 3",2",2".
ON MAINLINE OPENCUT PIPE REPLACEMENTS AND COMMERCIAL
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
VARIABLE SELECT GRANULAR BORROW FOR DRIVEWAY DRAINAGE PIPES OPENCUT.
6" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 FOR MAINLINE OPENCUT AND DRAINAGE PIPE REPLACEMENTS.
2
3
4
FOR DRIVEWAYS. PLACE IN TWO EQUAL LIFTS.
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B).
DRAINAGE OPEN CUT DETAIL
1
STA. 54+42 TO STA. 54+54
STA. 67+18 TO STA. 67+30
4
STA. 49+72 TO STA. 49+84
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_150ddt.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_150ddt26-AUG-202514
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
DESIGN DETAILS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 OF 2
Page 199 of 397
133.3'
66.7'
MILL INP. SURFACE
2.0"
1:400
1.0"
BITUMINOUS TAPER SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
2.0" MAXIMUM.
VARIABLE DEPTH MILLING
(FROM OVERLAY TO BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE)
66.7'
MILL INP. SURFACE
2.0"
1:400
BITUMINOUS TAPER SECTION
INP. PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
2.0" MAXIMUM.
VARIABLE DEPTH MILLING
(FROM OVERLAY TO BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE)
TOP OF INP. PAVEMENT
BITUMINOUS TAPER
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_150ddt.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_150ddt26-AUG-202515
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
DESIGN DETAILS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 OF 2
Page 200 of 397
HORIZONTAL CONTROL
ENGINEER OFFICE.
CONTACT MNDOT'S RESIDENT OR PROJECT
FOR INFORMATION ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS
(1996 ADJUSTMENT), DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATES.
THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR THIS PLAN IS NAD83
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_170ali.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_170ali26-AUG-202516
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ALIGNMENT PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
200
SCALE IN FEET
10 152025
30
35
13+91.71PT
12+31.56PC
160.00'R
160.16'L
87.51'T
35°48'35"D
(RT)57°21'4.23"Δ
243,867.0503Y
537,276.5044X
13+19.06PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
14+46.37PT
13+91.71PC
233.90'R
54.66'L
27.45'T
24°29'47"D
(RT)13°23'20.39"Δ
243,981.8922Y
537,271.2368X
14+19.16PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
37+21.57PT
35+11.35PC
4000.00'R
210.22'L
105.13'T
1°25'57"D
(RT)3°0'40.11"Δ
246,133.9416Y
537,216.6134X
36+16.48PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
39+96.46PT
37+21.57PC
1907.98'R
274.90'L
137.69'T
3°0'11"D
(RT)8°15'18.02"Δ
246,357.0186Y
537,120.7082X
38+59.25PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
21+10.46PT
19+82.58PC
1512.16'R
127.87'L
63.97'T
3°47'20"D
(LT)4°50'42.26"Δ
244,599.4321Y
537,383.3051X
20+46.56PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
22+84.67PT
21+19.94PC
2666.13'R
164.73'L
82.39'T
2°8'56"D
(LT)3°32'24.17"Δ
244,754.6772Y
537,397.0154X
22+02.33PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
24+86.53PT
22+97.89PC
4500.00'R
188.64'L
94.34'T
1°16'24"D
(LT)2°24'6.82"Δ
244,944.5582Y
537,402.0104X
23+92.23PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
31+36.11PT
30+25.67PC
1622.65'R
110.44'L
55.24'T
3°31'52"D
(LT)3°53'59.18"Δ
245,633.1861Y
537,391.2524X
30+80.91PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
33+25.33PT
31+36.11PC
620.45'R
189.21'L
95.35'T
9°14'4"D
(LT)17°28'23.32"Δ
245,783.2499Y
537,378.6649X
32+31.46PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
34+18.96PT
33+25.33PC
1338.87'R
93.63'L
46.84'T
4°16'46"D
(LT)4°0'25.28"Δ
245,914.8302Y
537,324.7859X
33+72.16PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
PI
PI
PI
P
I
P
IPI PI
PI
PI
PI
19+82.58 PC
21+19.94 PC
22+97.89 PC
30+25.67 PC
33+25.33 PCC
21+10.46 PT
22+84.67 PT
24+86.53 PT
31+36.11 PCC
34+18.96 PT
12+31.56 PC 35+11.35 PC
13+91.71 PCC
14+46.37 PT 37+21.57 PCC
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
17+02.78 POT
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY STA. 11+34
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
01+21.65PT
1+14.26PC
20.00'R
7.39'L
3.74'T
286°28'44"D
(RT)21°10'56.19"Δ
245,036.9237Y
537,326.7309X
1+18.00PI
MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
0+37.50PT
0+00.75PC
30.00'R
36.75'L
21.08'T
190°59'9"D
(LT)70°11'29.92"Δ
245,137.3486Y
537,313.0638X
0+21.83PI
MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
1+06.13PT
1+02.26PC
20.00'R
3.86'L
1.94'T
286°28'44"D
(LT)11°3'51.90"Δ
245,050.0884Y
537,322.5641X
1+04.20PI
MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
2+47.33PT
2+19.31PC
30.00'R
28.02'L
15.13'T
190°59'9"D
(LT)53°31'22.11"Δ
244,953.7100Y
537,280.3574X
2+34.43PI
MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
PIPIPI
PIPI
0+00.75 PC
1+02.26 PC
0+37.50 PT
1+06.13 PT
2+47.33 PT
1+14.26 PC
1+81.90 PC
1+21.65 PT
2+11.51 PT
0+00.00 START
2+84.71 END
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
Page 201 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_170ali.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_170ali26-AUG-202517
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ALIGNMENT PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
200
SCALE IN FEET
40
45
50
55
60
6570
42+85.40PT
39+96.46PC
1445.62'R
288.94'L
144.95'T
3°57'48"D
(RT)11°27'6.25"Δ
246,630.0143Y
537,047.5142X
41+41.41PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
47+06.48PT
43+70.37PC
6538.39'R
336.11'L
168.09'T
0°52'35"D
(RT)2°56'43.01"Δ
247,027.4665Y
537,026.9511X
45+38.46PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
51+93.87PT
50+24.33PC
5432.96'R
169.55'L
84.78'T
1°3'17"D
(RT)1°47'17.01"Δ
247,598.0504Y
537,039.1045X
51+09.11PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
56+94.66PT
53+02.31PC
4598.64'R
392.34'L
196.29'T
1°14'45"D
(RT)4°53'17.99"Δ
247,986.9609Y
537,060.7426X
54+98.61PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
61+81.28PT
59+44.97PC
1762.95'R
236.31'L
118.33'T
3°15'0"D
(RT)7°40'48.35"Δ
248,544.4067Y
537,151.5944X
60+63.30PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
70+20.09PT
64+20.08PC
1909.95'R
600.01'L
302.50'T
2°59'59"D
(RT)17°59'58.17"Δ
249,163.4416Y
537,379.1338X
67+22.58PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
PI
PI
PI
PI
PI
PI
43+70.37 PC
50+24.33 PC
53+02.31 PC
59+44.97 PC
64+20.08 PC
39+96.46 PCC
42+85.40 PT 47+06.48 PT 51+93.87 PT
56+94.66 PT 61+81.28 PT
57+87.84 POT
62+49.26 POT
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 202 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_170ali.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_170ali26-AUG-202518
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ALIGNMENT PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
200
SCALE IN FEET
70
75
80
81+88.06PT
79+95.82PC
180.00'R
192.24'L
106.43'T
31°49'52"D
(RT)61°11'30.70"Δ
250,276.8893Y
538,191.9039X
81+02.26PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
78+70.31PT
78+00.00PC
286.48'R
70.31'L
35.33'T
20°0'0"D
(LT)14°3'40.40"Δ
250,034.1950Y
538,079.9348X
78+35.33PI
SIBLEYMEMORIAL
PI
PI78+00.00 PC
78+70.31 PT
79+95.82 PC
70+20.09 PT
81+88.06 PT
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY STA. 82+29
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 203 of 397
1 of 2
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_171ali-tabs.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_131ali-tabs26-AUG-202519
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ALIGNMENT TABULATIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 204 of 397
2 of 2
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_171ali-tabs.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_131ali-tabs26-AUG-202520
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ALIGNMENT TABULATIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
Page 205 of 397
UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MMMMUUUUUUUUMUUMUUUUUUUUMMMMN
D
O
T
MNDOTMNDOTMNDOT ABANDONEDMNDOTCOMCASTCOMCASTCOMCASTCOMCASTCENTURYLINKMNDOTMNDOTCOUNTYMNDOT
MNDOTMNDOTCOUNTYCOUNTY
C
O
U
N
T
Y
COUNTYCITYSPRWSCI
TYCI
TYS
PRW
SSP
RW
SXCELFLI
NT HI
LLSCITYCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202521
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 OF 10
B
IG
R
IV
ER
S REG
IO
N
A
L TR
A
ILI
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
12' THRU LN12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
RU LN14'
R
LT12' THRU LN14
' RLT
INPLACE
SIGNAL
SYSTEM
50
SCALE IN FEET
T
E
1015SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIALSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
HW
Y
116.7'-8+01.32116.7'-8+01.32
Page 206 of 397
FMMMGPGPPoint Feature.Name
GPCOUNTYSPRWS
SPRWSXCELXCEL
XCEL
X
C
EL
XCEL
XCELXCEL GAS
VERIZONXCEL GASXCEL
GAS
XCEL GASCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202522
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 OF 10
1480
INP R/W
INP R/W INP R/W12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN BI
G RI
VERS REGI
ONAL TRAI
L50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
20
25SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
1
2
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
Page 207 of 397
XCEL
XCEL
XCEL GASVERIZON
CENTURYLINKXCELCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202523
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
3 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
30
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
0
1
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
Page 208 of 397
MNDOT
MNDOT
CITY
CITY
XCEL
XCEL
FLINT HILLS
VERIZON
VERIZON FLINT HILLSCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202524
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
4 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
35
40
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 209 of 397
CSCSMNDOT
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202525
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
45SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 210 of 397
CSMNDOTMNDOTXCELXCEL
XCELXCELCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202526
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
6 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
50
55
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 211 of 397
MNDOT
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202527
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
7 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
60
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 212 of 397
MNDOT
DAKOTA COUNTY
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202528
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
8 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
65
70
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 213 of 397
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNDOT
MNDOTMNDOTMNDOT
SPRWSCITY
SPRWSMNDOT
MNDOTCENTURYLINKCENTURYLINKCENTURYLI
NKCITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202529
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
9 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
75
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INPLACE BR. #19088INPLACE BR. #19087{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL T.H. 62 EBT.H. 62 WBPage 214 of 397
?
?
?MMMMMNDOT
MNDOT
MNDOT
MNDOTMNDOT
SPRWS
CITY
SPRWS
CITY
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:26-AUG-202530
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY & UTILITY PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
10 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
1
2' THRU LN1
2' THRU LNBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
50
SCALE IN FEET
80
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+29
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #97680
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 215 of 397
SB
SBSBSB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SBSB
SB
SB SB
SB
COE Wetland
Ditch #1
UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MMMMMMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202531
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 OF 10
I
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
12' RIGHT TURN LN12' THRU LN12' THRU LN14'
R
LT12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
R
U LN
REVISE
SIGNAL SYSTEM
+90
+02LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
T
E
1015SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIALSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
HW
Y
Page 216 of 397
SB
SBSBSB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
MMFMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202532
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W INP R/W12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN +84+96LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
20
25SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
1
2
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
Page 217 of 397
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202533
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
3 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN+36+80LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
30
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
0
1
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
Page 218 of 397
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202534
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
4 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
35
40
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 219 of 397
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
COE Wetland
Ditch #2
CSCSCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202535
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
45SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 220 of 397
SBSBSBSBSB
SB SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
COE Wetland
Ditch #3
COE Wetland
Ditch #4
CSCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202536
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
6 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W+84+72+42+54LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
50
55
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 221 of 397
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202537
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
7 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
60
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 222 of 397
SBSBSBSB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB
Ditch #5
COE Wetland
DAKOTA COUNTY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202538
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
8 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W +30+18+70LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
65
70
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 223 of 397
Wetland #1
Type 4
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202539
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
9 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
LEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
75
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INPLACE BR. #19088INPLACE BR. #19087{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL T.H. 62 EBT.H. 62 WBPage 224 of 397
SC
Wetland #2
Type 2M M?
?
?MMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_180rem.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_180rem26-AUG-202540
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
REMOVAL PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
10 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
1
2' THRU LN1
2' THRU LNLEGEND
MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")
MILL BITUMINOUS 4.0"
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENNVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
(FULL DEPTH)
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSB
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
REMOVE CONCRETE APRON
50
SCALE IN FEET
80
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+29
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #97680
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
Page 225 of 397
UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MMMMMMDitch #1
COE Wetland
0"0"0"0"
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202541
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 OF 10
B
IG
R
IV
ER
S REG
IO
N
A
L TR
A
ILI
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
12' THRU LN12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
RU LN14'
R
LT12' THRU LN14
' RLT
12' RIGHT TURN LNREVISE
SIGNAL SYSTEM +02+90+57
+63+01+23CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
T
E
1015SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIALSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
HW
Y
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 226 of 397
FMMM$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202542
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 OF 10
1480
INP R/W
INP R/W INP R/W12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN BI
G RI
VERS REGI
ONAL TRAI
L+84+96+63+01+33+66MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
20
25SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
1
2
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
1 ACCESS RD. 15' X 284.71'
NOTE:
1
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 227 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202543
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
3 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
+36+52+80+81+48+96+90+32CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
30
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
0
1
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 228 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202544
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
4 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
35
40
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 229 of 397
CSDitch #2
COE Wetland
CS$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202545
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
45SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 230 of 397
Ditch #3
COE Wetland
Ditch #4
COE Wetland
CS$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202546
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
6 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL+72+84+42+54CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
50
55
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 231 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202547
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
7 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
60
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 232 of 397
Ditch #5
COE Wetland
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202548
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
8 OF 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL+18+30+70 DAKOTA COUNTY
CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
65
70
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 233 of 397
MMMMMMMMMMMWetland #1
Type 4
MMMMMM$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202549
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
9 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL+58CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
75
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INPLACE BR. #19088INPLACE BR. #19087{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL T.H. 62 EBT.H. 62 WBTRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 234 of 397
?
?
?MMWetland #2
Type 2M M$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_185cpp.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_185cpp26-AUG-202550
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
10 OF 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
1
2' THRU LN1
2' THRU LNBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL+34CITY OF MENDOTA HIEGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
7" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
LEGEND
MIXTURE (4,B) (SPWEB340B)
4" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE
6" CONCRETE WALK
REPLACE 6" CONCRETE APRON
END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL TYPE 31
TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 7.0"
GRAVEL ACCESS PATH FOR MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
50
SCALE IN FEET
80
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+29
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #97680
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 235 of 397
0"0"
0"
0"
U
MH
U
MH
U
MH
?
TH 13
TH 13
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_210ada.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_210ada26-AUG-202551
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
ADA PLANS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN12' THRU LN12' RTL1
SITE
XX
SITE
QUADRANT LOCATION
6" CONCRETE WALK
LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. DIMENSIONS
AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS
TRUNCATED DOMES (SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038)
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%
IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE
BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM
INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL
INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL
BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0%
IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%
CURB HEIGHT
PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON STATION
F
S
X"
CONTROL POINTS AT GUTTER FLOW LINE
XXXX
FLOW ARROW
LEGEND
TRANSITION PANEL(S) - TO BE USED FOR
TRANSITIONING THE CROSS-SLOPE OF A RAMP TO
THE EXISTING WALK CROSS-SLOPE. RATE OF
FOOT OF WALK.
TRANSITION SHOULD BE 0.5% PER 1 LINER
T
PROPOSED SIGNAL POLE
PROPOSED DRAINAGE
HAND HOLE
20
SCALE IN FEET
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYSIBLEYMEMORIAL
1 OF 1
Page 236 of 397
600112' RIGHT TURN LNUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MM116.7'-8+01.32116.7'-8+01.32 T.E.1015INP
R
/W
I
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
12' THRU LN12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
R
U LN14'
R
LTSIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (T.H. 13)
B
IG
R
IV
ER
R
EG
IO
N
A
L TRA
ILSIBLEY MEMORIAL
12' THRU LNSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
H
W
Y
14
' RLT
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
1
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
1 OF 10
Page 237 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
MH
MH
MH
6000
6002 6003
6004
6005
5001
5002
6006
5000
BI
G RIV
ER REG
I
O
N
A
L TRA
I
LFGPT.E.T.E.T.E.20
25
INP R/W
INP R/W
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
1480
12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
2
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
2 OF 10
Page 238 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
6010
6009
6008
6007
BIG RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL
T
.E
.
T
.E
.
30
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
3
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
3 OF 10
Page 239 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
T.E.
T.E.
35
40
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
4
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
4 OF 10
NO DRAINAGE WORK ON THIS SHEET
SPECIFIC NOTES:
Page 240 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
T.E.
T.E.CS45
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INP R/W
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
5
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
5 OF 10
Page 241 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
5003
5004
6011
6012
BIG RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL
T.E.
T.E.CS50
55
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
INP R/W
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
6
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
6 OF 10
Page 242 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
60
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
INP R/W
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
7
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
7 OF 10
NO DRAINAGE WORK ON THIS SHEET
SPECIFIC NOTES:
Page 243 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
6013
6014
65
70
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
8
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
8 OF 10
Page 244 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
6015 6016MMM
MMMM75
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY T.H. 62T.H. 62INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #19088INP R/W
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
9
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
9 OF 10
Page 245 of 397
M DI
MH
LEGEND
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
EXISTING STORM SEWER/CULVERT
EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER/CULVERT
REPAIR STRUCTURE / REPLACE CASTING
PROPOSED APRON
PROPOSED MANHOLE
LINING PIPE SEWER
SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION
PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
ROW INPLACE
?
?MM80
INP R/W
END S.P. 1901-195 (T.H. 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+30
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19088SIBLEY MEMORIAL
12' THRU LN12' THRU LNINP R/W
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:Invalid expressionInvalid expressionTOTAL SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA SHEET NO.
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
Date
License #Print Name:
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DRAINAGE PLANS
1901-195
(T.H. 13)
10
12
54719Stephanie Rathburn
Invalid expression
HGS
HGS
50
SCALE IN FEET
10 OF 10
Page 246 of 397
816.77F.L. 815.62F.L. 600260032.6%
43.6'
RCP 15"818.39F.L. 0.2%
50.2'
RCP 15"818.50F.L.
6.8%
61.9'
RCP 15"
811.88F.L. 807.70F.L. ????T.C. 60040.9%
11.7'
RCP 22" SPAN
807.90F.L. 811.46T.C. 6006????T.C. 6005818.45F.L. 817.96F.L. 600960101.1%
46.3'
RCP 18"813.80F.L. 812.70F.L. 600760082.1%
52.9'
RCP 18"
Date
License #Print Name:
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
Stephanie Rathburn 54719
Invalid expression
HGS
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONPROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA STATE SHEET
OF
????
????
HGS
SLR
laws of the State of Minnesota.
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
DRAINAGE PROFILES AND TABULATIONS
PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOT NAME:Invalid expression$MODEL$MODELNAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:(T.H. 13)
1901-195
795
800
805
810
815
820
830
825
835
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
835
BE SHOWN ON 90% PLANS
DRAINAGE TABULATIONS TO
EXISTING GROUND (TYP)
Page 247 of 397
15.2%
145.6'
RCP 42"
804.59F.L.
782.40F.L. 811.46T.C. 60065.1%
27.4'
RCP 42"78
2
.40F.L. 789.28T.C. 50001.2%
57.9'
RCP 42"769.00F.L. 786.44T.C. 5001768.30T.C. 5002809.19F.L. 806.70F.L. 500350043.5%
70.7'
RCP 18"
1.6%
60.5'
RCP 18"805.92F.L. 804.93F.L. 60116012802.10F.L. 801.51F.L. 601360141.0%
59.8'
RCP 24"
Date
License #Print Name:
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
Stephanie Rathburn 54719
Invalid expression
HGS
NO DATE BY CKD APPR
REVISION
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONPROJ. NO.
MINNESOTA STATE SHEET
OF
????
????
HGS
SLR
laws of the State of Minnesota.
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
DRAINAGE PROFILES AND TABULATIONS
PATH & FILENAME:Invalid expressionPLOT NAME:Invalid expression$MODEL$MODELNAME:Invalid expressionPLOTTED/REVISED:(T.H. 13)
1901-195
770
775
780
785
790
795
805
800
810
770
775
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
SHOWN ON 90% PLANS
DRAINAGE TABULATIONS TO BE
5002UPDATED FOR 90% PLANS
TWO WASHOUT AREAS. WILL BE
PENDING GEOTECH RESULTS AT THE
SLOPE STABILIZATION DESIGN IS
DESIGNER NOTE:
EXISTING GROUND (TYP)
Page 248 of 397
UMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MMMCOE Wetland
Ditch #1
COE Wetland
Ditch #1
UMHUMHUMHUMHUMH?
?MMMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202562
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
1 of 10
B
IG
R
IV
ER
S REG
IO
N
A
L TR
A
ILB
IG
R
IV
ER
S REG
IO
N
A
L TR
A
ILI
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
I
NP R/WI
NP R/
W
12' THRU LN12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
RU LN14'
R
LT12' THRU LN14
' RLT
12' THRU LN12' TH
R
U LN
12' TH
RU LN14'
R
LT12' THRU LN14
' RLT
12' RIGHT TURN LN12' RIGHT TURN LNROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS BOULEVARD
LEGEND
SILT FENCE TYPE MS
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
T
E
T
E
1015SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIALSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
HW
Y
1015SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 11+34
BEGIN S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
{ SIBLEYMEMORIALSIB
L
E
Y
M
E
M
O
R
IA
L
HW
Y
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 249 of 397
FMMFCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202563
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
2 of 10
1480
1480
INP R/W
INP R/W INP R/WINP R/W
INP R/W INP R/W12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN BI
G RI
VERS REGI
ONAL TRAI
L12
' THRU
LN
12
' THRU
LN BI
G RI
VERS REGI
ONAL TRAI
LROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS BOULEVARD
LEGEND
SILT FENCE TYPE MS
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
20
25SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
1
2
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
20
25SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
1
2
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 250 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202564
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
3 of 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS BOULEVARD
LEGEND
SILT FENCE TYPE MS
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
TE
30
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
0
1
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
30
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
0
1
{ MAINTENANCE_ACCESS
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 251 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202565
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
4 of 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
35
40
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
35
40
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 252 of 397
COE Wetland
Ditch #2
CSCOE Wetland
Ditch #2
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202566
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5 of 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
45SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
45SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 253 of 397
COE Wetland
Ditch #3
COE Wetland
Ditch #4
CSCOE Wetland
Ditch #3
COE Wetland
Ditch #4
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202567
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
6 of 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAILBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 50
SCALE IN FEET
TE
TE
TE
TE
50
55
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
50
55
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 254 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202568
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
7 of 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
60
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
60
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 255 of 397
Ditch #5
COE Wetland
Ditch #5
COE Wetland
DAKOTA COUNTY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202569
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
8 of 10
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAILBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
65
70
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
65
70
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 256 of 397
MMWetland #1
Type 4
MMMMMMWetland #1
Type 4
MMCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202570
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
9 of 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
12' THRU LN
12' THRU LN
BIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
75
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INPLACE BR. #19088INPLACE BR. #19087{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL T.H. 62 EBT.H. 62 WB75
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
INPLACE BR. #19088INPLACE BR. #19087{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL T.H. 62 EBT.H. 62 WBDRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 257 of 397
?
?
?
Wetland #2
Type 2M MWetland #2
Type 2
?
?
?
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Design\PlanSheets\d1901195_325erc.dgn PLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:d1901195_325erc26-AUG-202571
TOTAL SHEETS 71
1901-195SP
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
PLANS
EROSION CONTROL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
26-AUG-2025DATE:
25421LIC. NO.
ROBERT EVBAYEKHA
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
10 of 10
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
INP R/W
1
2' THRU LN1
2' THRU LNBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
1
2' THRU LN1
2' THRU LNBIG RIVERS REGIONAL TRAIL
ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25
FERTILIZER TYPE 2 (22-5-10)
SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE
LEGEND
DOUBLE SILT FENCE
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
50
SCALE IN FEET
80
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+29
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #97680
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
80
END S.P. 1901-195 (TH 13)
SIBLEYMEMORIAL STA. 82+29
GREAT RIVER RD.INPLACE BR. #19087INPLACE BR. #97680
{ SIBLEYMEMORIAL
DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION
CULVERT END CONTROLS
AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
Page 258 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: Design StandardsPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:01. SP 1901-195 (TH 13) Tabs28-MAY-2025 13:31PRINT NAME:LICENSE #
DESIGN SQUAD
DATE:SIGNATURE:
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
ST1
58708
AL REINHARDT, BEN CHRISTENSEN
ERIC LAUER-HUNT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SHEETS ST1-ST WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
SIGNING PLAN INDEX
TITLE SHEET
ROADWAY LAYOUTS
5
SIGNING LEGEND
ABBREVIATIONS
SIGN
ST2 TABULATIONS
ST3-ST5
REVISIONSBY: DATE:
SIGNING
TITLE SHEET ST
STTOTAL SHEETS
SP 1901-195
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
5
1
GENERAL INFORMATION:
IF LOCATION CAN NO LONGER BE USED CONTACT ENGINEER ON SITE FOR GUIDANCE ON PLACEMENT.
8. PLACE NEW REFERENCE LOCATION SIGNS AT THE SAME LOCATION OF THE EXISTING REFERENCE LOCATION SIGNS BEING REPLACED.
7. PLACE SIGNS AFTER FINAL GRADING IS COMPLETE.
OR SALVAGED MAY NOT INCLUDE PANEL OR SUPPORT INFORMATION IN THE TABULATION.
6. SIGNS AND DELINEATOR/MARKER TABULATIONS DISPLAY SIGN PANEL AND SUPPORT INFORMATION FOR PROPOSED SIGNS. SIGNS BEING REMOVED
THESE PANELS BASED UPON THE CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS FROM THE TABULATIONS.
INSTEAD ARE LENGTHS OF THEIR SIDES OR DIAMETER. SEE THE MNDOT STANDARD SIGNS AND MARKINGS MANUAL FOR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF
5. STANDARD SIGN PANELS ARE LISTED IN THE TABULATIONS WITH TWO DIMENSIONS THAT MAY NOT BE THEIR ACTUAL WIDTH OR HEIGHT, BUT
4. SEE STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS FOR SIGN STRUCTURE INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT.
3. SEE PANEL LAYOUTS FOR SIGNS WITH THE CODE "DESIGN".
2. SEE MNDOT STANDARD SIGNS AND MARKINGS MANUAL FOR STANDARD SIGN DESIGNS, SPLICE PLATES, STRINGERS AND PUNCHING CODES.
1. MOUNTING HEIGHT IS MINIMUM (WITH A + 6 INCH TOLERANCE)
THIS SHEET SIGNIFIES THE ENGINEER SELECTED THE STANDARD PLANS AS APPROPRIATE FOR USE ON THE PROJECT
THE LISTED STANDARD PLANS ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN SET. THE CERTIFICATION ON
SQ-SOIL SQUARE TUBE IN SOIL
Page 259 of 397
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: Design StandardsPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:01. SP 1901-195 (TH 13) Tabs28-MAY-2025 13:31ST
STTOTAL SHEETS
SP 1901-195
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
SIGNING
TABULATIONS
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LIC. NO.58708
Eric Lauer-Hunt
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5
2
_________________________________
S.A.P.NO. __________________________
_________________________________Page 260 of 397
2STOP22
2MUSTTURN RIGHTRIGHT LANES-1122S
IBLE
Y
MEMOR
IAL
H
IGHWAY
SB TH 13NB TH 13100
SCALE IN FEET
NOTES:
F & I
INPLACE2
1
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: Design StandardsPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:02. SP 1901-195 (TH 13) Roadway Layouts28-MAY-2025 13:31ST
STTOTAL SHEETS
SP 1901-195
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
SIGNING
ROADWAY LAYOUT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LIC. NO.58708
Eric Lauer-Hunt
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5
3
_________________________________
S.A.P.NO. __________________________
_________________________________
15
20
25
Page 261 of 397
S-44S-74STOP2STOP
2 S-51S-61AHEADS-24S-31AHEADSIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
100
SCALE IN FEET
NOTES:
F & I
INPLACE2
1
REMOVE4
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: Design StandardsPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:02. SP 1901-195 (TH 13) Roadway Layouts28-MAY-2025 13:31ST
STTOTAL SHEETS
SP 1901-195
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
SIGNING
ROADWAY LAYOUT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LIC. NO.58708
Eric Lauer-Hunt
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5
4
_________________________________
S.A.P.NO. __________________________
_________________________________
25
30
35
40
Page 262 of 397
AHEADAHEADS-9S-814SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
100
SCALE IN FEET
NOTES:
F & I
REMOVE4
1
$@p@$PATH & FILENAME: Design StandardsPLOTTED/REVISED:PLOT NAME:02. SP 1901-195 (TH 13) Roadway Layouts28-MAY-2025 13:31ST
STTOTAL SHEETS
SP 1901-195
(TH 13)
SHEET NO
SIGNING
ROADWAY LAYOUT
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
LIC. NO.58708
Eric Lauer-Hunt
MINNESOTA.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SHEET WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
5
5
_________________________________
S.A.P.NO. __________________________
_________________________________
45
50
55
Page 263 of 397
INDEX
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
UNITT.E.DESCRIPTIONNO.
ITEM
ID
SYSTEM
TABULATED SIGNAL QUANTITIES SS
QUANITITES
ESTIMATED
2565
TRAFFIC CONTROL REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEMS
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM SYSTEM 11736375
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
AND STANDARD PLATES
AND SYMBOLS TABULATED QUANTITIES
SIGNATURES,INDEX, ABBREVIATION,
- T.H. 13 AT MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF:
-
SS2-SS4
SS1PLOTTED/REVISED: IPLOT NAME:PATH & FILENAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\1901\195\Traffic\Signals\SP 1901_195.dgnsignature sheet 18-AUG-2025PLOTTED/REVISED:STATE PROJ.NO. 1901-195 (T.H.13) 1SHEET NO. SS 4OF SS SHEETS
1 4
STANDARD PLATES AS APPROPRIATE FOR USE ON THE PROJECT.
THE CERTIFICATION ON THIS SHEET SIGNIFIES THE ENGINEER SELECTED THE
THE LISTED STANDARD PLATES ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN SET.
FIBER OPTIC SPLICE VAULT
TELEVISION CAMERA (CCTV)
PV
F0
2
3
3-2
BM
4
WP
1
CKD BY:CKD BY:
DRAWN BY:
SJK
REVISED BY:REVISED BY:AS BUILT BY:
CKD BY:GAK
DATE:DATE:DATE:DATE:
CKD BY:
XXX XXX XXX
XXX XXX XXX
LUMINAIRE NO.
SIGNAL BASE NO.
VIDEO DETECTION
EQ.G CONNECTION
ABBREVIATIONS
SYMBOLS
EVP CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
EVP DETECTOR
EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
BARREL MOUNT BASE NO.
WOOD POLE NO.
HANDHOLE
SIGNAL HEAD NO./FLASHER HEAD NO.
SPLICE
SYTEM ID: 1736375
PULL VAULT
V
FOR PLANS AND UTILITIES SYMBOLS SEE TECHNICAL MANUAL
ADVANCE WARNING FLASHER
COUNT DOWN
DETECTOR (PHASE 2, NO. 1)
DEGREES
DON'T WALK
FURNISH AND INSTALL
FLASH/FLASHING
FLASHING YELLOW ARROW
FLASHING YELLOW LEFT ARROW
GREEN LEFT ARROW
GREEN INDICATION
GROUND ROD
GREEN RIGHT ARROW
GREEN THRU ARROW
HANDHOLE
INDICATION
INPLACE
INSULATED GROUND
JUNCTION BOX
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE
LUMINAIRE
NEUTRAL
PEDESTRIAN HEAD (PHASE 1, NO. 1)
PUSH BUTTON
PUSH BUTTON (PHASE 2, NO. 1)
PEDESTRIAN
RED INDICATION
REMOVE AND SALVAGE
RED LEFT TURN ARROW
SALVAGE AND INSTALL
SPARE
STATION
WALK INDICATION
YELLOW INDICATION
YELLOW LEFT ARROW
YELLOW RIGHT ARROW
AWF
C.D.
D2-1 (e.g.)
DEG
DWK
F&I
FL
FYA
FYLA
GLA
GRN
GR. RD.
GRA
GTA
HH
IND
INP
INS. GR.
JB
LED
LUM
NEU
P1-1 (e.g.)
PB
PB2-1 (e.g.)
PED
RED
R&S
RLA
S&I
SPR
STA
WLK
YEL
YLA
YRA
DESIGNER
Greg Kern
STEPHEN KURALLE
10/00/0000LIC. NO.DATE:
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SHEETS SS THROUGH SS OF THIS PLAN WERE
AND STANDARD PLATES
SYMBOLS,TABULATED QUANTITIES
SIGNATURE,ABBREVIATIONS,
Page 264 of 397
LOCATIONLOCATION TYPE
SAW CUT
SAW CUT
SAW CUT
SAW CUT
DESIGNATION STATUS
LOOP DETECTOR CHART
INPLACE
250
30
0
5
5 & 20
475
5
20 & 35
475
5
35
D8-1
D8-2,D8-3
D8-4
D4-3
D4-1
D6-1, D6-2
D4-4,D8-5
D4-2
D2-1, D2-2
D1-2, D5-2
D1-1, D5-1
4
CONTROLLER PHASING
2
3
5
5
2
2
4
MENDOTA HTS. RD.P4-1
P4-2
8
MENDOTA HTS. RD.1
6
1
6
6
SIGNAL SYSTEM OPERATION
BEING PROTECTED LEFT TURN PHASES.
- NORMAL OPERATION IS 6 PHASE, WITH PHASES 1 AND 5
- THE SIGNAL SYSTEM FLASH MODE IS ALL RED.
B
A 3
4
5
6
FACE GYR
8-1,8-2,8-3,8-4
6-1,6-2,6-3
5-1,5-2
4-1,4-2,4-3,4-4
2-1,2-2,2-3
1-1,1-2
40
SCALE IN FEET
MATCHLINE AMATCHLINE BMATCHLINE C
2-2/C#14
2" PVC
4-2/C#14
1-3/C#20
2-3/C#12
3-12/C#12
3" RSC
1-6PR#19
4-2/C#14
2-3/C#20
5-3/C#12
5-12/C#12
4" PVC
1-2/C#14
2" PVC
1-3/C#12
2" PVC
1-3/C#20
2-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC
1-6PR#19
9-2/C#14
2-3/C#20
5-3/C#12
5-12/C#12
4" PVC
1-2/C#14
2" PVC
DIRECT BURIED
1-6PR#19
VAULT
FO PULL
ABANDON
1
D5-1 D5-2
D1-1D1-2
D8-3D8-4D8-2D8-59
8
(55 MPH POSTED)
T.H. 13
7
6
5
2
3
15
1
14
12 11
(55 MPH POSTED)
T.H. 13
(40 MPH POSTED)MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD(50 MPH POSTED)MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDA
B
1
1-2
4-2
1-1
4-1
2
3
6-1
8-4
6-3
6-2
5-2
8-2
48-3
5
5-1
8-1
2
2-3
2-2
4-4
2-14-3
6
1-COAXIAL CABLE
1-COM CABLE
(CAMERA POWER)
1-3/C#14
4-2/C#14
1-3/C#20
4-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC
1-COAXIAL CABLE
1-COM CABLE
C#14 (CAMERA POWER)1-3/
8-2/C#14
1-3/C#20
5-3/C#12
4-12/C#12
4" PVC
1-7/16" GROUND BRAID TO GROUND ROD
1-COAXIAL CABLE
1-COM CABLE
1-3/C#20
1-3/C #14 (CAMERA POWER)
3-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC TO HH 5
1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW) PB4-1
LUMINAIRE-250W HPS
(PHASES 1&6)
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
TYPE D SIGN
1-R9-3 SIGN (NO PEDS)(FACING POLE 4)
TYPE 10A AT 180 DEG
1-CD PED HEAD AT 90 DEG
TYPE 10B AT 90 DEG
FROM END OF MAST ARM)
OVERHEAD (0' AND 11'
2-ONE WAY SIGNALS
1-VIDEO CAMERA (CAM 1301)
TYPE PA100-A-40-X6-350/CAM (AT 350 DEG)
PA1OO POLE FOUNDATION
FO PIGTAIL (6SM)
1-PRE-TERM ARMORED
3" RSC
1-1.5" PVC INSIDE
TO FO PULL VAULT
CONTROLLER CABINET
3-1/C#2
CONDUIT TO HH 15
2" RSC RISER, WEATHERHEAD AND
SOP - WOOD POLE (XCEL ENERGY)
2
(B1)
PB4-1
(B3)
PB4-2
(B2)
PB4-3
1-3/C#20
3-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC TO HH 11
LUMINAIRE-250W HPS
(PHASES 2&5)
CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
TYPE D SIGN
FACING POLES 1 & 5
2-R9-3 SIGN (NO PEDS)
2-TYPE 10A AT 90 & 180 DEG
FROM END OF MAST ARM)
OVERHEAD (0' AND 11'
2-ONE WAY SIGNALS
(DAVIT AT 350°)
TYPE PA100-A-35-D40-9
PA1OO POLE FOUNDATION
1
1-3/C#20
3-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC TO HH 11
1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW) PB4-3
LUMINAIRE-250W HPS
(PHASE 4)
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT
TYPE D SIGN
R9-3 SIGN (NO PEDS) FACING POLE 6
CD PED HEAD AT 180 DEG
TYPE 10B AT 180 DEG
TYPE 10A AT 90
FROM END OF MAST ARM
ONE WAY SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 0'
TYPE PA100-A-50-D40-9(DAVIT AT 350 DEG)
PA1OO POLE FOUNDATION
SIGNAL HEAD CHART
LINE IN FEET
-LOCATION: DISTANCE FROM CROSSWALK/STOP
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
-ALL LOOP DETECTORS ARE 6' X 6'
PIGTAIL (6SM)
1-ARMORED FO
1.5" HDPE
PIGTAIL (6SM)
1-ARMORED FO
1.5" HDPE
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
1-3/C#20
2-3/C#12
2-12/C#12
3" RSC TO HH 7
CONFIRMATORY LIGHT (PHASE 8)
ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND
TYPE D SIGN
(FACING POLES 3&5)
2-R9-3 SIGNS(NO PEDS)
HEAD 8-3
1-R10-12 SIGN ADJACENT TO
2-TYPE 10A AT 90 & 180 DEG
ONE WAY SIGNAL OVERHEAD
TYPE PA100-A-45
PA100 POLE FOUNDATION
1-12/C#12
2" RSC TO HH 8
(FACING POLES 4&6)
2-R9-3 SIGNS (NO PEDS)
TYPE 6A
13' PEDESTAL POLE PLUS BASE
PEDESTAL FOUNDATION
1-12/C#12
2" RSC TO HH 8
(DBL ARROW) PB4-2
1-APS PB AND SIGN
TYPE 6A
13' PEDESTAL POLE PLUS BASE
PEDESTAL FOUNDATION
4 EVP
8 EVP
2&5 EVP
1&6 EVP
3-1/C#2
SERVICE CABINET TO HH 15
2-3/C#12
2" RSC
SERVICE CABINET TO HH 1
1-1/C#6 INS. GR.
2-1/C#6
2" RSC TO CONTROLLER
CAPPED BOTH ENDS)
3" RSC STUBBED OUT (THREADED AND
1-6PR#19 (ABANDONED)
9-2/C#14
2-3/C#20
4-3/C#12
5-12/C#12
4" RSC TO HH 14
1-COAXIAL CABLE
1-COM CABLE
1-3/C#14 (CAMERA POWER)
8-2/C#14
2-3/C#20
8-3/C#12
6-12/C#12
4" RSC TO HH 1
CONTROLLER AND CABINET
SERVICE CABINET
EQUIPMENT PAD
REMOVE: HH 6
F&I NMC LOOP DETECTORS PHASE 4.
2. WORK DESCRIPTION:
1. ALL ITEMS ARE INPLACE UNLESS NOTED BY
NOTES: IPLOT NAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\0000\Traffic\Signals\105.46_SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY-1736375\Pending\T1736375_sgl.dgnlayout 18-AUG-2025PLOTTED/REVISED:CERTIFIED BY DATE: LIC. NO.
BY DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY:SJK CKD BY:GAK DATE: S.A.P. NO.
STATE PROJ.NO. 1901-195 (T.H.13)
IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY
TH 13 AT MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
INTERSECTION LAYOUT
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
FILENAME:OLD SYSTEM ID:
METER ADDRESS: 1440 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SYSTEM ID: 1736375 T.E.
2SHEET NO. SS 4OF SS SHEETS
D4-1
D4-2
D4-3
4-2/C#14
2" CONDUITREMOVE:
PULL BACK:
INPLACE
INPLACE
F&I
INPLACE
INPLACE
F&I
F&I
INPLACE
INPLACE
INPLACE
C13
01
PV
Page 265 of 397
40
SCALE IN FEET
MATCHLINE AMATCHLINE BMATCHLINE C
1-2/C#14
2" PVC
D2-2
D2-1
4
(55 MPH POSTED)
T.H. 13
2-2/C#14
2" PVC
D6-1
10
D6-2
(55 MPH POSTED)T.H. 13
1-2/C#14
2" PVC
13
D8-1(40 MPH POSTED)MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDPIGTAIL (6SM)
1-ARMORED FO
1.5" HDPE
IPLOT NAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\0000\Traffic\Signals\105.46_SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY-1736375\Pending\T1736375_sgl.dgnpole notes 18-AUG-2025PLOTTED/REVISED:CERTIFIED BY DATE: LIC. NO.
BY DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY:SJK CKD BY:GAK DATE: S.A.P. NO.
STATE PROJ.NO. 1901-195 (T.H.13)
IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY
TH 13 AT MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
MATCH LINES
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
FILENAME:OLD SYSTEM ID:
METER ADDRESS: 1440 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SYSTEM ID: 1736375 T.E.
3SHEET NO. SS 4OF SS SHEETS
F&I NMC LOOP DETECTORS PHASE 4.
2. WORK DESCRIPTION:
1. ALL ITEMS ARE INPLACE UNLESS NOTED BY
NOTES:
Page 266 of 397
SERVICE CABINET
2
1
SERVICE
SIGNAL
POWER
INPUT
2-1
2-2
2-3
4-4
5-1
8-1
8-2
8-3
5-2
1-2
4-2
4-3
1-1
4-1
6-1
6-2
6-3
8-4
3-1/C #2
2-1/C #6
2
2-1/C# 6
1
2
90
3,412-21
17-213
SHALL BE ARRANGED AS SPECIFIED ABOVE
NOTE: ALL TERMINAL BLOCK CONNECTIONS
CLR
BLK
CONDUCTOR COLOR CODING
4/C#18
BLK
WH
R
G
CONTROLLER CABINET
35,36HH 13
TO
3
P4-2
P4-2
P4-1
14 7
9
10
HH 9
HH 11HH 8
HH 10
8
LUMINAIRE
3
1
11
HH 7
21
20
19
17 18
HH 14
HH 1
TO
D1-1
12
D1-2
13
D6-1
15
D6-2
16
90
46
D4-1
47
D4-2
22
D8-5
23
D8-4
24
D8-3
25
D8-2
30
D5-1
31
D5-2
38
SPR
37
D4-3
36
D2-2
35
D2-1
26 27
29
45
28
HH 1
LUMINAIRE
3
1
LUMINAIRE
4
2
S.O.P.
D4-3
37
D4-1
46
D4-2
47
39
41
42
43
LUMINAIRE
4
2
44
D5-2
31
D5-1
30
D2-1
35
D2-2
36
HH 3
HH 4
HH 2
32 33
34
D8-5
22
D8-3
24
D8-2
25
D8-4
23
HH 12D6-216D6-115D1-112D1-213EQ.G
NEU
NEU
7
YEL
RED
GRN
YEL
RED
GRN
SPR
SPR
SPR
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
8
YEL
RED
GRN
SPR
SPR
SPR
YEL
RED
GRN
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
14
YLTA
RLTA
GLTA
SPR
SPR
SPR
YEL
RED
GRN
NEU
11
SPR
SPR
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
17
YEL
RED
GRN
SPR
SPR
SPR
YEL
RED
GRN
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
18
YLTA
RLTA
GLTA
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
NEU
21
SPR
SPR
44
NEU
DWK
WLK
43
NEU
SPR
PB4-1
27
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GRN
YEL
RED
SPR
SPR
SPR
GRN
YEL
RED
32
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GLTA
YLTA
RLTA
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
26
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GLTA
YLTA
RLTA
SPR
SPR
SPR
DWK
SPR
WLK
40
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GRN
YEL
RED
SPR
SPR
SPR
GRN
YEL
RED
29
NEU
SPR
33
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GRN
YEL
RED
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
SPR
39
EQ.G
NEU
NEU
GRN
YEL
RED
GRN
YEL
RED
SPR
SPR
SPR
40
2-1/C
6PR#19
12/C#12
G
G/BLK
BLK/WH
BLK
WH/BLK
BL/BLK
O/BLK
R/BLK
WH
BL
O
R
5/C#12
G
WH
BLK
O
R
3/C#20
BLK OR BL
WH OR YEL
R OR O
3/C#12
BLK
WH
R
2/C#14
HH 5
3,7-23,90
HH 151 35,36
P4-1
8-4
3
6-36-26-1
4-3
1
4-21-2
2
4-11-1
4
5-28-38-2
4-4
6
2-32-22-18-1
5
5-1
966SM
FIBER OPTIC
96
PULL VAULT
TO TMS
34
NEU
SPR
PB4-2
PB4-2
98
POWER
CAMERA
7/16 BR GR
1-6PR #19
PILOT KNOB RD
TO
INTERCONNECT
(ABANDONED)
PILOT KNOB RD
TO
INTERCONNECT
(ABANDONED)
HUB
TO EVP
HUB
TO EVP
HUB
TO EVP
HUB
TO EVP
26-47,97-99
46,47,97-99
4,31-44,
4,37-44,46,47,97-99
99
CAMERA COM
97
CAMERA COAX
GR.RD.
97
99
COAX
CAMERA
COM
CAMERA
NEU
98
EQG
CAM PWR
SPR
SPR
PB4-3
PB4-1
PB4-3
2&5 EVP LT
8 EVP LT
DETECTOR
2&5 EVP
DETECTOR
8 EVP
DETECTOR
EVP
2&5
10
NEU
9
2&5 EVP LT
SPR
DETECTOR
EVP
8
20
NEU
19
8 EVP LT
SPR
DETECTOR
42
EVP
6&1
DETECTOR
45
EVP
4
28
NEU
SPR
4 EVP LT
41
NEU
SPR
6&1 EVP LT
DETECTOR
6&1 EVP
DETECTOR
4 EVP
4 EVP LT
6&1 EVP LT
3/C#14
WH
G
BLK
IPLOT NAME:Projects\DM_ROS\013\0000\Traffic\Signals\105.46_SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY-1736375\Pending\T1736375_sgl.dgnwiring diagram 18-AUG-2025PLOTTED/REVISED:CERTIFIED BY DATE: LIC. NO.
BY DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY:SJK CKD BY:GAK DATE: S.A.P. NO.
STATE PROJ.NO. 1901-195 (T.H.13)
IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY
TH 13 AT MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
FIELD WIRING DIAGRAM
REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
FILENAME:OLD SYSTEM ID:
METER ADDRESS: 1440 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
SYSTEM ID: 1736375 T.E.
4SHEET NO. SS 4OF SS SHEETS
ARE INPLACE.
ALL OTHER ITEMS SHOWN
SYSTEM PAY ITEM WORK.
DENOTES REVISE SIGNAL
#38 SPOOL IN HH 5
Page 267 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
8.c
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-86 Ordering of Improvements for the Hampshire Estates
Street Project
ITEM TYPE: Public Hearing
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-86 Ordering of the Hampshire Estates Street Improvements project.
BACKGROUND:
The preparation of a feasibility report for the Hampshire Estates Street Improvements, which is
required to follow the Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 process, was authorized by the
Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2024-55 at the City Council meeting
held on October 1, 2024. The Statute 429 process is required because the city intends to
assess a portion of the project.
The feasibility report was subsequently accepted by the City Council on November 18, 2025,
and a Public Hearing was scheduled for December 16, 2025, by adoption of Resolution 2025-
78. The report recommends proceeding with the Hampshire Estates Street Improvements
project.
The proposed streets to be rehabilitated are Abbey Way, Canton Court, Hampshire Court,
Hampshire Drive, Haverton Circle, Haverton Road, Morson Circle, Park Lane, Pond Circle East,
Pond Circle West, and Winthrop Court. Based on staff observations and further verified by
pavement condition ratings and a geotechnical investigation, these streets have deteriorated
to the point where it is no longer cost effective to patch the street and rehabilitation is
necessary.
The feasibility report indicates the estimated costs for the project, along with preliminary
assessment estimates. At the end of the feasibility report, a project financing summary is
included to show project cost splits and funding sources to be utilized. The total estimated
cost of the project is $2,528,700 including indirect costs.
Staff held an informational meeting on December 4, 2025, for residents within the project area.
Page 268 of 397
Staff are proposing to prepare plans and specifications internally while a future professional
services agreement is anticipated for construction administration, including topographic
surveying, materials testing, and construction observation.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Street improvement projects are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.
Pursuant to the City’s Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, the benefiting
properties should be assessed 50% of the street reconstruction and rehabilitation costs. The
following tables show the total estimate project cost, proposed funding sources, and
estimated unit assessments based on the City policy.
PROJECT COSTS
Project Total Total Estimated
Costs
Street Improvements $1,256,029.95
Indirect Costs for Street Improvements
(20%)*
$251,205.99
Total Costs for Street Improvements $1,507,235.94
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Improvements $132,655.79
Indirect MSA Improvements (20%)* $26,531.16
Total Costs for MSA Improvements $159,186.94
Park & Trail Improvements $141,939.77
Indirect Costs Park & Trail Improvements
(20%)*
$28,387.95
Total Costs for Trail Improvements $170,327.72
Storm Sewer Improvements $394,259.31
Water Improvements $73,850.70
Sanitary Improvements $30,486.23
Total Cost for Utility Improvements $498,596.23
Saint Paul Regional Water Service
Watermain Improvements
$168,128.79
Indirect Costs for SPRWS (15%) $25,219.32
Total Cost for SPRWS Improvements $193,348.10
Total Improvement Cost $2,197,350.52
Total Indirect Costs for City* $331,344.42
Page 269 of 397
Total Cost $2,528,694.94
Rounded Total Cost $2,528,700
*Includes 20% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance.
FUNDING SOURCES
Funding Source Project Total
Municipal Levy $753,629.94
Municipal Levy - Parks $170,327.72
Total Municipal Levy $923,957.66
Municipal State Aid Funds (Roadway &
Trail)
$159,186.94
Residential Assessments (50%) $753,606.00
Utility Fund - Storm Sewer $394,259.31
Utility Fund - Sanitary $73,850.70
Utility Fund - Water $30,486.23
Saint Paul Regional Water Services $193,348.10
Total $2,528,694.94
ASSESSMENT CALCULATIOINS – STREET REHABILITATION
Assessment Calculation Total
Total Project Cost $2,528,694.94
Assessable Amount $1,507,235.94
Assessment Amount (50% of
Assessable Amount)
$753,606.00
Total Units 126
Unit Assessment (Assessment amount/
Total Units)
$5,981.00
Proposed Unit Assessment Amount $5,981.00
The estimated residential assessments for the project are calculated to be $5,981.00 per parcel
for the street improvements; however, staff are hopeful that competitive bids will be received
on the project reducing the assessment to residential properties and overall project cost.
Page 270 of 397
The project shows a total Municipal Levy of $923,957.66 and a total project cost of
$2,528,694.94. It is presumed that the City would secure bonding for the Municipal Levy and
Residential Assessment portions of the project ($753,606.00). The assessment amount is
equivalent to 44.9% of the bond amount. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 Special Assessment
Bond Issue requires that a minimum of 20% of the total bond issue amount be recovered
through special assessments.
As the project is designed and competitively bid, the calculated assessment amount will be
updated leading up to the adoption of the assessment roll. The improvements are necessary
to allow for safe and reliable street and utility services within the City of Mendota Heights. The
project will be competitively bid to allow for a cost effective improvement. The feasibility study
has provided an overall analysis of the feasible improvements for consideration within this
project area. Therefore, the proposed improvements within the areas outlined in this report
are necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-86 Ordering of the Hampshire Estates Street Improvements Project.
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 271 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-86
A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR THE HAMPSHIRE
ESTATES STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT #202506)
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, the Mendota Heights City Council authorized the holding
of a public hearing (the “Hearing”) under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, as amended (the “Act”), to
discuss and consider various street rehabilitation projects, storm water infrastructure improvement,
bituminous reclamation, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter improvements, bituminous surfacing,
trail improvements and appurtenant work (collectively, the “Improvements”), in and along portions of the
following streets; Abbey Way, Canton Court, Hampshire Court, Hampshire Drive, Haverton Circle,
Haverton Road, Morson Circle, Park Lane, Pond Circle East, Pond Circle West, and Winthrop Court
(collectively, the “Assessment Area”); and
WHEREAS, also on November 18, 2025, the Council received a feasibility report on the
Improvements from the Public Works Director (the “Feasibility Report”), which report explored the
feasibility and estimated costs to provide the Improvements under the Act; and
WHEREAS, the estimated costs of the Improvements, as detailed in the Feasibility Report, is
$2,528,700, and will be financed from a combination of available City Utility Funds, Special
Assessments, Municipal State Aid funds, Saint Paul Regional Water, and general obligation improvement
bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has held a neighborhood informational meeting in
December, to give each neighborhood in the Assessment Area a summary of the Improvements, and the
necessity of such Improvements to the general overall health of the City; and
WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the Hearing was given,
as required by the Act, and the Hearing was held on the date hereof, at which time all persons desiring to
be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, a reasonable estimate of the total amount to be assessed, and a description of the
methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels within the Assessment Area,
has been made available for the Hearing.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, as follows:
1.The Improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the Feasibility
Report. Specifically, the Improvements are necessary to update the City’s street
infrastructure system, as many streets were originally constructed more than 33 years
ago, and contain pavement that has been continually patched, seal coated, and slurry
sealed, but now is in need of rehabilitation. The repair of associated aging water
infrastructure concurrently with the street reconstruction is additionally recommended for
project efficiency. Finally, the Improvements are feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
2.The Improvements are hereby ordered. The Council shall let the contract for all or part
of the Improvements, as authorized by Section 429.041, Subdivision 1 of the Act, no later
than December 31, 2026.
Page 272 of 397
3. The Improvements have no relationship to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
4.The Public Works Director shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
Improvements, which plans and specifications shall be placed on file at the City upon
completion.
5.The Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for all or a portion of the costs
of the Improvements from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds. The City has a reasonable
expectation that it will issue one or more series of tax-exempt bonds in the estimated
maximum principal amount of $2,528,700 to finance the Improvements, and the City will
make reimbursement allocations with respect to such original expenditures for the
Improvements from the proceeds of the Bonds.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of December, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 273 of 397
9.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Authorize the Purchase of OpenGov's Asset Management Software
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Authorize a purchase for the acquisition and implementation of OpenGov’s Asset Management
software.
BACKGROUND:
The City continues to maintain, assess, and expand its asset inventory across utilities,
transportation infrastructure, parks, fleet, facilities, and other public service areas. As assets age
and regulatory requirements continue to grow, the need for a centralized, consistent, and data-
driven asset management system has become increasingly important. The City’s current tools
and workflows rely heavily on spreadsheets, paper records, and department-specific processes,
which limits efficiency and makes long-term planning more difficult. For example, the City is
currently using separate systems for pavement condition forecasting, utility maintenance
records, park inspections, equipment logs, and work order requests. These systems do not
interact with one another, and they do not provide a citywide way to track maintenance
activities or identify trends in operating costs.
The OpenGov Asset Management platform provides a unified system to store information on
the condition, age, location, and maintenance history of City assets, as well as the ability to
forecast replacement needs and assess long-term investment strategies. The system also
includes a citywide work order module, allowing departments to submit, assign, schedule, and
complete tasks in a consistent format. Each work order is linked directly to the associated asset,
providing a complete maintenance history and improving accountability and documentation.
The software will be used extensively across nearly every operational department.
Page 274 of 397
Within the utilities divisions, the system will track sanitary sewer and storm sewer pipes based
on age, material, and inspection results, helping staff schedule cleaning, televising, and repair
work. It will also maintain detailed records of stormwater system components such as ponds,
inlets, outlets, and best management practices. This will allow the City to better document
regulatory compliance and track long-term trends such as phosphorus and sediment removal.
In the roadway and street maintenance area, the software will maintain data on pavement
condition, historical maintenance costs, signage, pavement markings, and related features. The
City will be able to link expenditures directly to specific roadway segments, strengthening
future budgeting and helping identify higher-cost areas that may need earlier attention or
rehabilitation.
Parks and Recreation staff will use the platform to inventory playgrounds, athletic fields, park
buildings, trails, and other amenities. Routine inspections, such as playground safety checks,
can be logged immediately in the system, allowing staff to track maintenance needs and
monitor annual operating costs for each individual site or facility.
Fleet maintenance is another significant component of the system. The software will track
vehicles and equipment by age, hours of use, mileage, condition, and maintenance history. Fuel
usage and maintenance data can be monitored over time, supporting more informed decisions
about replacement schedules and budgeting. Specialized equipment used by Public Works and
the Par 3 golf course can also be cataloged and rated for planning purposes.
Emergency services and public safety staff will benefit from improved documentation during
natural disasters and emergency events. The platform can record labor, equipment usage,
materials, and contractor costs in formats consistent with FEMA reimbursement requirements.
Police fleet maintenance, equipment inventory, and specialty gear tracking can also be
managed within the same system.
Staff will manage facilities by using the software to record the condition, age, and maintenance
requirements for all City-owned buildings. Routine service tasks—such as HVAC maintenance,
fire extinguisher inspections, emergency lighting checks, and plumbing repairs—can be
scheduled and documented directly within the platform, ensuring that facility needs are
consistently tracked across all sites.
Work orders are a substantial driver for adopting the system. The City currently does not have
a single, organized process for submitting and tracking work orders. Departments record
requests differently, and there is no mechanism to measure completion times, workload
distribution, or the full maintenance history of a given asset. OpenGov will provide a
centralized portal that allows staff to submit requests, assign tasks, and track progress from
start to finish. Each work order becomes part of the asset’s long-term history, improving
transparency and supporting more efficient resource planning.
Full implementation of the OpenGov Asset Management platform is expected to take
Page 275 of 397
approximately six months. During this period, OpenGov will work with staff to configure the
system, migrate existing datasets, develop asset inventories, and establish department-specific
workflows. Once the system is built out, staff will participate in roughly seven days of
structured training, including three days of on-site instruction for field crews and hands-on
operational staff. This phased approach will help ensure that employees across all departments
are comfortable with the platform and able to use it effectively on a day-to-day basis. As staff
become more comfortable with the system and more information is added, updated, and
tracked over time, the system will increasingly provide the City with reliable, data-driven
insights that support better decision-making, more proactive maintenance, and clearer long-
term planning.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The purchase of OpenGov Asset Management software was included in the City’s approved
2026 budget. The platform includes an annual subscription cost starting at $24,006 and
increasing 5% annually as well as a one-time implementation cost of $75,645, for a total of
$99,651 in 2026. Costs will be shared proportionally across the departments and funds that will
use the system, including utilities, stormwater, engineering, transportation, fleet, and parks. The
following table summarizes the different funding sources by year as well as future costs
anticipated through 2030:
Funding Sources 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Levy (Streets, Parks, & Fleet) $31,584 $11,681 $12,265 $12,878 $13,522
Sanitary Sewer $14,672 $4,686 $4,921 $5,167 $5,425
Storm Sewer $22,872 $4,686 $4,921 $5,167 $5,425
GopherOne Call $19,129 $2,909 $3,054 $3,207 $3,367
Police (FEMA) $11,393 $1,243 $1,306 $1,371 $1,439 $99,651 $25,206 $26,466 $27,789 $29,179
Although approval is being requested in 2025, the City will not make any payments until 2026,
and no work with the vendor will begin until that time. Early approval allows the City to secure
current-year pricing prior to the vendor’s scheduled annual increases on new contracts.
In the long term, the system is expected to improve capital planning, enhance the accuracy of
maintenance cost tracking, streamline regulatory reporting, reduce asset failures through more
proactive maintenance, and improve coordination between departments.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. OpenGov Order Form
2. OpenGov Statement of Work
3. OpenGov Master Services Agreement
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Page 276 of 397
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive
and Responsive Government, Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy
Page 277 of 397
OpenGov Inc.
660 3rd Street, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94107
United States
Order Form Number: Q-12863 Prepared By: Samantha Grabovac
Created On: 12/03/2025 Email: sgrabovac@opengov.com
Order Form Expiration: 12/19/2025 Contract Term: 36 Months
Subscription Start Date: 01/01/2026
Subscription End Date: 12/31/2028
Customer Information:
Customer: City of Mendota Heights,
MN
Contact Name: Meredith Lawerence
Bill To/Ship To: 1101 Victoria Curv, Email: mlawrence@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Mendota Heights, Minnesota Phone: 1 (612) 741-8150
55118
United States
Order Details:
Billing Frequency: Prepaid
Payment Terms: Net 30 Days
SOFTWARE SERVICES:
Product Name Start Date End Date Annual Fee
811 Integration 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $1,585.98
Asset Management 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $5,920.99
Parks & Recreation Domain 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $3,288.27
Stormwater Domain 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $3,279.03
Transportation Domain 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $3,512.90
Walkability Domain 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $3,139.41
Wastewater Collection 01/01/2026 12/31/2026 $3,279.03
Page 278 of 397
811 Integration 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $1,665.28
Asset Management 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $6,217.04
Parks & Recreation Domain 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $3,452.68
Stormwater Domain 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $3,442.98
Transportation Domain 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $3,688.55
Walkability Domain 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $3,296.38
Wastewater Collection 01/01/2027 12/31/2027 $3,442.98
811 Integration 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $1,748.54
Asset Management 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $6,527.89
Parks & Recreation Domain 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $3,625.31
Stormwater Domain 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $3,615.13
Transportation Domain 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $3,872.98
Walkability Domain 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $3,461.20
Wastewater Collection 01/01/2028 12/31/2028 $3,615.13
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
Product Name Start Date Description Fee
Professional Services
Deployment - Prepaid 01/01/2026 Custom Deployment from OpenGov Professional Services team.
Scope-dependent. $75,645.00
Professional Services Total: $75,645.00
Travel and Expense (Billed as incurred and not to exceed): $2,800.00
Page 279 of 397
Customer Billing/Service Periods:
Period: Total:
01/01/2026 $99,650.61
01/01/2027 $25,205.89
01/01/2028 $26,466.18
Order Form Legal Terms:
This Order Form incorporates the OpenGov Master Services Agreement ("MSA") attached here or available at
https://opengov.com/terms-of-service/master-services-agreement/.
The "Agreement" between OpenGov and the entity identified above ("Customer") consists of the Order Form, MSA, and,
if Professional Services are purchased, the Statement of Work.
Unless otherwise specified above, fees for the Software Services and Professional Services shall be due and payable, in
advance, 30 days from receipt of the invoice.
By signing this Agreement, Customer acknowledges that it has reviewed, and agrees to be legally bound by the
Agreement. Each party’s acceptance of this Agreement is conditional upon the other’s acceptance of the Agreement to the
exclusion of all other terms
City of Mendota Heights, MN: OpenGov, Inc.
Signature:
____________________________
Signature:
____________________________
Name:
____________________________
Name:
____________________________
Title:
____________________________
Title:
____________________________
Date:
____________________________
Date:
____________________________
Page 280 of 397
Statement of Work
City of Mendota Heights, MN
Creation Date: 5/02/2025
SoW Expiration Date: 12/31/2025
Document Number: PS-08670.2
Created by: Dean Simpson
PS-08670.2
1
Page 281 of 397
Table of Contents
OpenGov Statement of Work 4
1. Project Scope 4
2. Adjustments to the Project Scope, Estimated Schedule, Charges and other Terms 4
3. Project Delivery 4
4. Project Understanding 5
5. OpenGov Responsibilities 5
6. Project Tracking and Reporting 5
7. Communication and Escalation Procedure 6
8. Opengov Implementation Methodology 7
8.1. Initiate 7
8.2. Validate 7
8.3. Configure 7
8.5. Launch 8
9 . Customer Responsibilities 8
10. Customer ’s Project Manager 8
11. Acceptance Procedure 9
12. Estimated Schedule 10
13. Illustrative Project Timelines 10
14. Change Order Process 10
Exhibit 1: Implementation Activities 12
Enterprise Asset Management 12
Initiate 12
Validate 13
Configure 13
Train 22
Launch 25
PS-08670.2
2
Page 282 of 397
OpenGov Statement of Work
This Statement of Work (“SOW”) identifies services that OpenGov will perform for City of
Mendota Heights, MN (“Customer”) pursuant to the order for OpenGov Professional
Services. This SOW may not be modified or amended except in a written agreement signed
by a duly authorized representative of each party. The OpenGov Responsibilities section of
this document can be found in Exhibit 1: Implementation Activities. Any additional services
or support not detailed in Exhibit 1 will be considered out of scope.
1. Project Scope
Under this project, OpenGov will deliver cloud based solutions (detailed list in
“Exhibit 1”). OpenGov's estimated charges and schedule are based on performance
of the activities listed in the “OpenGov Responsibilities” section below. Deviations
that arise during the project will be managed through the procedure described in
Section 14.
2. Adjustments to the Project Scope, Estimated Schedule, Charges and other Terms
Adjustments to the deliverables in Exhibit 1 may include charges on a
time-and-materials or fixed-fee basis using OpenGov ’s standard rates.
3. Project Delivery
3.1. OpenGov will perform the work under this SOW remotely unless explicitly
identified below.
3.1.1. OpenGov will provide one (1) onsite trip for project-related activity which
OpenGov determines would be best performed at the Customer ’s facility. The
customer 's facility must contain a conference room to accommodate the
number of attendees, non-public wifi connection, and AV equipment for
projecting OpenGov software on a screen visible to all participants.
3.1.2. The Customer is responsible for paying travel expenses as incurred on a
quarterly basis. It is estimated that the travel expenses will not exceed $2,800.
Written approval is required for any expenses above the estimate.
3.2. OpenGov will use personnel and resources located across the United States,
and may also include OpenGov-trained implementation partners to support the
deliver y of services.
4. Project Understanding
4.1. Deviations that arise during the proposed project will be managed through the
Change Order Process (as defined in Section 14) , and may result in adjustments to
the Project Scope, Estimated Schedule, Charges, and/or other terms.
PS-08670.2
3
Page 283 of 397
4.2. The OpenGov Suites are not customized beyond current capacities based on
the latest release of the software. Implementation of any custom modification or
integration developed by OpenGov; Customer internal staff; or any third-party is
not included in the scope of this project unless specifically listed in Exhibit 1.
4.3. The customer is responsible for providing appropriate time and resources to
the project to meet deliverables as outlined in the project plan.
4.4. Data conversion services from other software system(s) or sources are not
included in the scope of this project unless specifically listed in Exhibit 1.
5.OpenGov Responsibilities
5.1. OpenGov will provide project management for the OpenGov responsibilities in
this SOW. This provides direction to OpenGov project personnel and a shared
framework for project planning, communications, reporting, procedural and
contractual activity.
5.2. OpenGov will review the Project Plan with Customer’s Project Manager and key
stakeholders to ensure alignment on agreed upon timelines.
5.3. OpenGov will maintain project communications through Customer’s Project
Manager.
5.4. OpenGov will establish documentation and procedural standards for deliverable
materials.
5.5. OpenGov will assist Customer’s Project Manager to prepare and maintain the
Project Plan for the performance of this SOW which will include the activities, tasks,
assignments, and project milestones identified in Exhibit 1.
6.Project Tracking and Reporting
6.1. OpenGov will review project tasks, schedules, and resources and make changes
or additions, as appropriate. OpenGov will measure and evaluate progress against
the Project Plan with Customer's Project Manager.
6.2. OpenGov will work with Customer’s Project Manager to address and resolve
deviations from the Project Plan.
6.3. OpenGov will conduct regularly scheduled project status meetings.
6.4. OpenGov will administer the Change Order Process with the Customer's Project
Manager.
6.5. Deliverable Materials:
6.5.1. Weekly status reports
6.5.2. Project Plan
6.5.3. Project Charter, defining project plan and Go-live date
6.5.4. Risk, Action, Issues and Decisions Register (RAID)
PS-08670.2
4
Page 284 of 397
6.6. Deliverable Sign-Off: OpenGov requests Sign-Offs at various deliverables
during the implementation of the project. Once the Customer has signed-off on a
deliverable, any additional changes requested by Customer on that deliverable will
require a paid change order for additional hours for OpenGov to complete the
requested changes.
7. Communication and Escalation Procedure
7.1. Active engagement throughout the implementation process is the foundation of
a successful deployment. To help assess progress, address questions, and minimize
risk during the course of deployment, both parties agree to the following:
7.1.1. Regular communication aligned to the agreed upon Project Plan and
timing.
7.1.2. OpenGov expects our customers to raise questions or concerns as
soon as they arise. OpenGov will do the same, in order to be able to address
items when known.
7.2. Executive involvement
7.2.1. Executives may be called upon to clarify expectations and/or resolve
confusion.
7.2.2. Executives may be needed to steer strategic items to maximize the
value through the deployment.
7.3. Escalation Process
7.3.1. Identification of an issue impeding deployment progress or outcome,
that is not acceptable.
7.3.2. Customer or OpenGov Project Manager summarizes the problem
statement and impasse.
7.3.3. Customer and OpenGov Project Managers jointly outline solution
acceptance and OpenGov Project Manager will schedule an Executive Review
Meeting, if necessary.
7.3.4. The resolution will be documented and signed off.
8. Opengov Implementation Methodology
Every OpenGov implementation will contain a structured methodology to properly
plan and collaborate. The methodology consists of the following phases:
PS-08670.2
5
Page 285 of 397
●Initiate
●Validate
●Configure
●Train
●Launch
8.1. Initiate
8.1.1. OpenGov will provide customer entity configuration.
8.1.2. OpenGov will provide system administrators creation.
8.1.3. This activity is complete when the customer has access to their site.
8.1.4. Customer will sign-off on product access to complete the Initiate
Phase of the project.
8.2. Validate
8.2.1. OpenGov will create a Solution Blueprint.
8.2.2. OpenGov will confirm the Data Validation strategy.
8.2.3. This activity is complete when the Solution Blueprint is presented to
the customer.
8.2.4. Customer will Sign-off on Initial Draft Solution Blueprint to complete
the Validate Phase of the project.
8.3. Configure
8.3.1. OpenGov will configure the deliverables outlined in Exhibit 1.
8.3.2. This activity is complete when all deliverables in Exhibit 1 are
configured.
8.3.3. Customer will provide Sign-off that all configuration deliverables have
been completed and accepted. OpenGov will provide status and intermediate
completion milestones as the project progresses to fully configured.
8.4. Train
8.4.1. Training will be provided in instructor-led virtual sessions unless
otherwise specified in Exhibit 1.
8.4.2. OpenGov will provide Administrator training.
8.4.3. OpenGov will provide End User training (if listed in Exhibit 1).
8.4.4. Customer will sign-off that training has been completed.
8.5. Launch
8.5.1. OpenGov will provide HyperAdopt support post Go-Live to ensure
successful adoption.
8.5.2. Customer will Sign-off on the HyperAdopt phase of the project which
will transition the project from active deployment to Customer Success.
PS-08670.2
6
Page 286 of 397
9 . Customer Responsibilities
9.1. The completion of the proposed scope of work depends on the full commitment
and participation of Customer ’s management and personnel. The Customer ’s Project
Manager should have access to the appropriate Customer Subject Matter Expert
personnel needed for the successful implementation of the project. The
responsibilities listed in this section are in addition to the responsibilities specified
in the Agreement and are to be provided at no charge to OpenGov. OpenGov's
performance is predicated upon the following responsibilities being managed and
fulfilled by the customer. Delays in performance of these responsibilities may result
in a change order and/or delay of the completion of the project.
9.2. Provide the required data to OpenGov within five (5) days of the requests being
made from the OpenGov Project Manager. The Customer will be responsible for any
potential charges from third parties to access and provide the data.
9.3. Maintain the same format and access to data on an ongoing basis. Any changes
to the underlying data or data source may require a change order or charge in the
future.
10. Customer ’s Project Manager
10.1. Create, with OpenGov ’s assistance, the Project Charter for the performance of
this SOW which will include the activities, tasks, assignments, milestones and
estimates.
10.2. Manage Customer personnel and responsibilities for this project (for example:
ensure personnel complete any self-paced training sessions, configuration,
validation or user acceptance testing).
10.3. Identify and assign Subject Matter Experts (SME).
10.4. Serve as the communication liaison between OpenGov and Customer
representatives participating in the project.
10.5. Participate in project status meetings.
10.6. Obtain and provide information, data, and decisions within ten (10) business
days of OpenGov ’s request unless Customer and OpenGov agree in writing to a
different response time.
10.7. Resolve deviations from the estimated schedule.
10.8. Help resolve project issues and escalate issues within Customer ’s
organization, as necessar y.
10.9. Administer the Change Order Process with the Project Manager, if applicable.
11. Acceptance Procedure
11.1. The completed items in Exhibit 1 will be submitted to the Customer ’s Project
Manager.
11.2. Customer ’s Project Manager will have decision authority to approve/reject all
PS-08670.2
7
Page 287 of 397
Project Criteria, Phase Acceptance and Engagement Acceptance.
11.3. Within five (5) business days of receipt, the Customer ’s Project Manager will
either accept the Deliverable Material or provide OpenGov ’s Project Manager a
written list of requested revisions. If OpenGov receives no response from the
Customer ’s Project Manager within five (5) business days, then the Deliverable
Material will be deemed accepted. The process will repeat for the requested
revisions until acceptance.
11.4. All acceptance milestones and associated review periods will be tracked on
the Project Plan.
11.5 Both OpenGov and Customer recognize that failure to complete tasks and
respond to open issues may have a negative impact on the Project.
11.6. For any tasks not yet complete, OpenGov and/or Customer will provide
sufficient resources to expedite completion of tasks to prevent negatively
impacting the Project.
11.7. Excluding delays caused by a force majeure event, if OpenGov in good faith
reasonably determines that Customer ’s personnel or contractors are not
completing Customer ’s responsibilities described in the applicable SOW timely or
accurately, OpenGov may place the Professional Services on hold after providing a
minimum of seven days written notice to Customer. If OpenGov places a Customer
on hold, OpenGov will ensure that Customer is made aware of its obligations
necessary for OpenGov to continue performing the Professional Ser vices in the on
hold notice. Upon placing a customer on hold, OpenGov may, without penalty,
suspend Professional Services to the Customer and reallocate resources until the
Customer has fulfilled its obligations. OpenGov shall bear no liability or otherwise
be responsible for delays in the provision of the Professional Ser vices occasioned
by Customer ’s failure to complete Customer ’s responsibilities.
12. Estimated Schedule
12.1. OpenGov will schedule resources after the signature of the order form is
received. Unless specifically noted, the OpenGov assigned Project Manager will
work with Customer Project Manager to develop the Project Charter for all
requested deliverables under this SOW. OpenGov reser ves the right to adjust the
schedule based on the availability of OpenGov resources and/or Customer
resources, and the timeliness of deliverables provided by the Customer.
12.2. The Ser vices are currently estimated to start within two (2) weeks but no later
than four (4) weeks from signatures on Order Forms.
13. Illustrative Project Timelines
13.1. The typical project timelines are for illustrative purposes only and may not
reflect Customer ’s use cases. The order of delivery of the suite(s) will be determined
during the project planning activities in the Initiate Phase.
PS-08670.2
8
Page 288 of 397
14. Change Order Process
14.1. This SOW and related efforts are based on the information provided and gathered
by OpenGov. Customer acknowledges that changes to the scope may require additional
effort or time, resulting in additional cost. Any change to scope must be agreed to in
writing, by both Customer and OpenGov, and documented via a Change Order. No
verbal agreement will be binding on OpenGov or Customer.
14.2. A Change Order is defined as work that is added to or deleted from the original
scope of this SOW. Depending on the magnitude of the change, it may or may not alter
the original contract amount or completion date. Changes might include but are not
limited to:
14.2.1. Timeline for completion.
14.2.2. Sign off process.
14.2.3. Cost of change and/or invoice timing.
14.2.4. Amending the SOW to correct an error.
14.2.5 Extension of work as the complexity identified exceeds what was
expected by Customer or OpenGov.
14.2.6. Change in type of OpenGov resources to support the SOW.
14.3.The approval process for a Change Order is as follows:
14.3.1.Identification and documentation of a need for modification to the scope
of the project as defined in the Statement of Work and any subsequent change
orders.
14.3.2. A Change Order is created and Customer and OpenGov review. The
Customer will then provide Sign-off.
14.3.3. Change Order is incorporated into the Statement of Work and
implemented.
PS-08670.2
9
Page 289 of 397
Exhibit 1: Implementation Activities
Enterprise Asset Management
Use Cases Build for Enterprise Asset Management:
●Transportation
●Walkability
●Parks and Rec
●Stormwater
●Wastewater Collection / Sanitary Sewer
●Fleet
Initiate
OpenGov will:
●Setup a hosted, sandbox and production OpenGov Asset Management environment.
●Provide an overview, up to two (2) hours, of OpenGov and ArcGIS Online user-based
logins and User/Role functionality.
●Provide a template file to be utilized by Customer staff to populate Roles and Users
to be utilized for OpenGov Asset Management.
●Utilize the template to create users and roles in OpenGov Asset Management. (Note:
Subsequent User and/or Role changes will be Customer administrator’s
responsibility.)
●Provide documentation and guidance, up to four (4) hours, for Customer technical
GIS staff to configure Esri Basemap Services for OpenGov Asset Management
integration. Guidance will be geared towards OpenGov Asset Management/Esri
integration functionality and requirements.
●Setup the OpenGov Asset Management Platform, including the Request, Work,
Resource, and Asset Management areas of the software. Asset Management
solutions will be set up for all solutions referenced in the Assets section of the scope
unless otherwise noted.
●Implement identity provider initiated SSO for Microsoft ADFS, Microsoft Azure AD,
or Okta.
OpenGov Assumptions:
●OpenGov assumes that the customer is responsible for performing quality control measures
on its data in EAM.
Completion Criteria:
●The project kicked off with an initial project timeline delivered.
PS-08670.2
10
Page 290 of 397
Validate
OpenGov will:
● Provide a remote, up to twenty four (24) hours, requirement gathering workshop to
increase our understanding of Customer business and functional goals. Through
workshops and inter views, OpenGov will identify best fit scenarios for OpenGov
Asset Management and provide a brief including any challenges as well as
recommendations for OpenGov Asset Management best practices relevant to
Customer implementation.
Completion Criteria:
● Completion of requirements gathering workshop.
Configure
Configurations
OpenGov will:
● Provide configuration services, including:
o Up to ten (10) custom fields and up to two (2) custom layouts per asset type
listed in the Assets section below
o Up to thirty (30) custom fields and up to ten (10) custom layouts to be utilized
in any of the shared areas of the system, such as Tasks
o Up to twenty (20) automations
o Up to twenty (20) preventative maintenance plans
● Provide configuration services related to MS4 workflows, including:
○ Up to forty (40) custom fields and up to two (2) custom layouts to be utilized for MS4
inspections
○ Up to ten (10) automations
○ Up to five (5) reports to be defined during requirements gathering
OpenGov Assumptions:
● Implementation of any custom modification developed by OpenGov; your internal staff; or
any third-party is not included in the scope of this project unless specifically listed above.
Data Services
OpenGov will:
● Provide one sandbox and one production data load service through standard
import/export functionality. OpenGov will provide template documents for data
population. Once populated by Customer staff, OpenGov will load the data into
Customer sandbox or production OpenGov Asset Management environment. Data
loads may include data such as:
o Parent level asset records
o Asset location (spatial x/y) attributes
o Parent level resource (Labor, Equipment Material, Vendor) records
o Resource Rate (Labor, Equipment, Material) records
PS-08670.2
11
Page 291 of 397
o Standard system libraries
●Provide the following data services to load customer’s pavement data into OpenGov
Enterprise Asset Management:
o OpenGov will provide a template file to third-party vendors, so processed data can
be delivered to OpenGov in the required format.
o OpenGov will provide a review, not to exceed two (2) hours, of Enterprise Asset
Management data requirements to customer and third-party vendor staff.
o OpenGov will provide a field map review, not to exceed two (2) hours, to identify the
Enterprise Asset Management destination fields for up to 10 additional data
attributes which may have been collected.
o A test conversion service to facilitate data conversion validation and testing
o One revision of the source data used for the test conversion service
o A production conversion service utilizing the final, approved source data
Assumptions, Requirements, and Considerations
●This scope of work is isolated to data load activities and does not include any manipulation
of collected data.
●Data must be provided to OpenGov staff in Esri shapefile or .csv formats
○If Pavement spatial data is not provided, and does not currently exist in the
customer Enterprise Asset Management database, OpenGov will load Pavement
condition data without impacting the existing spatial implementation.
○Prior to collection efforts, third-party vendors must ensure collected data can be
linked to a OpenGov Pavement ID.
●OpenGov Enterprise Asset Management calculates PCI values based on the ASTM-6433-11 –
Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys standard.
Data collection firms are required to provide Distress, Severity, and Extent values as
specified by the aforementioned standard.
The following data attributes are either required (*) or highly recommended to support robust
pavement management functionality in OpenGov.
PAVEMENT INVENTORY TABLE
NAME DATA TYPE DESCRIPTION
*OpenGov ID Text
Unique identifier for OpenGov Pavement
(section) record.
PS-08670.2
12
Page 292 of 397
Note: This ID will be used to link all
associated roadway section related
tables
* Pavement
Length
Quantity
(Number w/
Unit)
Length of the Pavement section
Note – Quantity fields require two data
cells per row: 1 Number value and 1 Unit
of Measure (m, km, mi, yd)
* Pavement
Width
Quantity
(Number w/
Unit)
Width of the Pavement section
Note – Quantity fields require two data
cells per row: 1 Number value and 1 Unit
of Measure (m, km, mi, yd)
* Pavement
Classific
ation
Text (Lookup) Pavement Classification
value for OpenGov
Pavement record.
Default values: Asphalt,
Brick and Block,
Concrete, Earth, and
Gravel
* Function
Classific
ation
Text (Lookup) Functional Classification
value for OpenGov
Pavement record.
Default values: Rural
Arterial, Rural Collector,
Rural Local, Urban
Arterial, Urban Collector,
and Urban Local
Street Text (Lookup) Street name for OpenGov
Pavement record
Street Ahead Text (Lookup) (Intersecting) Street Ahead
name for OpenGov
Pavement record
Street Back Text (Lookup) (Intersecting) Street Back
name for OpenGov
Pavement record
Construction
Date
Date Construction date helps
establish a baseline for
each asset. This baseline
is crucial when
managing condition and
deterioration of high
cost, high impact assets.
PS-08670.2
13
Page 293 of 397
● Pavement attributes must include Length and Width values
● Pavement Classifications should be limited to the following:
○ Gravel
○ Brick and Block
○ Concrete
○ Asphalt
○ Earth
●
● Functional Classifications should be limited to the following:
○ Rural Arterial
○ Rural Collector
○ Rural Local
○ Urban Arterial
○ Urban Collector
○ Urban Local
PAVEMENT INSPECTION TABLE
NAME DATA TYPE DESCRIPTION
* OpenGov ID Text
Unique identifier for OpenGov
Pavement (section) record.
Note: This ID will be used to link all
associated roadway section related
tables
* Inspection ID Text Unique identifier for
inspections
* Inspection
Date
Date Inspection date
Average IRI Quantity with Unit If applicable, a
pre-calculated Average
IRI value must be
provided. Additionally,
an Average IRI value
should be converted
and provided in a 0 to
100 scale for use in
OpenGov ’s Overall
PS-08670.2
14
Page 294 of 397
Condition Index (OCI)
calculation.
PAVEMENT DETAILED DISTRESS TABLE**
NAME DATA TYPE DESCRIPTION
* OpenGov
ID
Text
Unique identifier for OpenGov
Pavement (section) record.
Note: This ID will be used to link all
associated roadway section related
tables
*
Inspecti
on ID
Text Unique identifier for
Inspection records
*Sample ID Text Unique identifier for
Sample Areas
Sample To Integer Identify the end of the
Sample Area
Sample
From
Integer Identify the beginning of
the Sample Area
Sample
Width
Quantity with Unit Identify the Width of the
Sample if the Sample
Width differs from the
Pavement Width
*Distress Text (Lookup) Values must match
distresses specified in
the ASTM-6433-11
standard.
*Severity Text (Lookup) Low, Moderate, High
*Extent Number Must be represented as a
percentage number
value
Note: Distress data should be collected in accordance with ASTM D-6433-11 standards, including
extent and severity.
PS-08670.2
15
Page 295 of 397
● Distress Severities must be limited to the following:
○ Low
○ Moderate
○ High
● Standard distresses:
○ Asphalt Longitudinal Cracking and Asphalt Transverse Cracking should be combined
into a single distress.
○ PCC Faulting Right and PCC Faulting Left should be combined into a single distress.
○ PCC Longitudinal Cracking and PCC Transverse Cracking should be combined into a
single distress.
○ Asphalt Raveling & Weathering should be separated into Asphalt Raveling and Asphalt
Weathering – Surface Wear.
● ASTM-6433-11 requires unique “Distress + Severity” combinations per Sample area.
PAVEMENT CONDITION CATEGORY TABLE
NAME DATA TYPE DESCRIPTION
* OpenGov
ID
Text
Unique identifier for OpenGov
Pavement (section) record.
Note: This ID will be used to link all
associated roadway section
related tables
* Inspection
ID
Text Unique identifier for
Inspection records
Condition
Categor
y
Text (Lookup) A value that generally
reflects a high-level
condition using a 0
to 100 scale index.
For example,
OpenGov
Enterprise Asset
Management
recognizes PCI as a
Condition
Category. IRI values
provided in a
converted 0 to 100
scale can be loaded
as a Ride Condition
Category thereby
PS-08670.2
16
Page 296 of 397
impacting the
Overall Condition
Index (OCI) value in
Index Integer A value, on a 0 to 100
scale, which
reflects the
condition of the
corresponding
Condition Category
Customer will:
●Provide PCI data in the OpenGov format within two (2) weeks of project kick-off.
OpenGov Assumptions:
●OpenGov assumes that the customer is responsible for performing quality control measures
on its data in EAM.
●Data conversion services from other software system(s) or sources (including Navigator
databases) are not included in the scope of this project unless specifically listed above.
Integrations
●OpenGov will provide a bi-directional integration service between 811 and OpenGov. The
integration includes the following:
○811 Tickets (formatted as XML text files) are requested from a Google Gmail account.
○Tasks are created in OpenGov from 811 Ticket Data.
○This integration only adds Task records. Records are never updated.
○When Tasks are completed in OMS the Positive Response will be updated in your 811
system
○Integration Fields
■Ticket Number→ OpenGov 811 Ticket
■Ticket RevNum → OpenGov 811 Revision
■District Code→ OpenGov 811 Member
■Printable Text Information → OpenGov 811 Details
●All values contained the XML ticket file will be:
■Aggregated into printable text information and stored in 811 Details
■Stored in HTML format version and attached to the record in OMS
■OpenGov 811 Response Code → Positive Response
■OpenGov 811 Response Comment (If required by state) à Positive Response
Comment
■811 Response Status (Positive Response) →OpenGov 811 Response Status
■811 Response Results (Positive Response) → OpenGov 811 Response Results
■OpenGov Fields set by Integration by default
●Task ID: <ticket>-<revision>-<District Code>-<year>
●Asset Type: Non-Asset
●Activity: Utility Locates
PS-08670.2
17
Page 297 of 397
● Department: 811
● Shape: Polygon if available, other wise centroid.
● Address Number: <TickAddress> \<Number>
● Street: <TickAddress> \<Street> if already in Streets librar y.
● Intersecting Street: <TickAddress> \<NearInt>, if already in Streets
librar y.
● Location Description: (doesn’t require values to be in OMS libraries)
○ Address: 3330 TEMPLETON GAP RD Cross: CHAIN DR
○ Place: COLOR ADO SPRINGS County: EL PASO
○ Grids: 13S066W32NE 13S066W33NW
■ OpenGov Attachments
● Original Ticket
● Map URL if available in the ticket
● Printable text as HTML
○ Errors are handled as such:
■ Any files with errors are skipped. The error files are moved to a folder
labeled Other within the Gmail account for manually processing.
■ Errors can be reported via email using the standard ‘If an automation fails
send a notification’ automation template within OMS.
■ All files not designated as 811 tickets are skipped but will not produce an
error.
■ Duplicate records cause an error
○ OpenGov will provide all services remotely via audio, video, and web conferences
unless otherwise noted.
○ The following service items are not included in the scope of this project:
■ Implementation of any custom modification or integration developed by
OpenGov, your internal staff, or any third-party is not included in the scope
of this project unless specifically listed above.
■ Data conversion ser vices from other software system(s) or sources
(including OpenGov Navigator databases) are not included in the scope of
this project unless specifically listed above.
■ Any service items discussed during demonstrations, conference calls, or
other events are not included in the scope of this project unless specifically
listed above.
● Provide a uni-directional (one-way) Integration Service between Gasboy and OpenGov. The
integration includes:
○ A one-way integration of data from the source system to OpenGov
○ Up to 12 fields in the same OpenGov recordset (IE: Equipment table and Equipment’s
Fuel Log table)
○ A sync using a unique ID
■ If ID exists; information will be updated
■ If ID does not exist; OpenGov will create a record or produce an error
message
○ A customer-configurable runtime interval for the sync
PS-08670.2
18
Page 298 of 397
Assumptions
■ The integration will include up to 12 fields (in the same OpenGov recordset)
■ Customer staff will be responsible for populating required values utilized to
support integration.
■ All data must be accessible to the OpenGov service from a flat file (.csv or
.txt)
■ Customer will be responsible for configuring automated exports from
Gasboy
■ OpenGov will install an agent (software executable) on the customer 's server
where the Gasboy export resides to upload data to OpenGov.
■ Customers server must have access to the internet
OpenGov Assumptions:
● If an API integration is included in scope, Customer is responsible for providing access to a
test instance of the third party API including a URL, authentication credentials, and
relevant documentation.
● Implementation of any custom modification or integration developed by OpenGov; your
internal staff; or any third-party is not included in the scope of this project unless
specifically listed above.
Assets
OpenGov will:
● Provide installation and training on the following asset types:
o Transportation (8)
▪ Bridge; Light Fixture; Pavement; Sign; Guardrail; Marking; Pavement
Area; Support
o Walkability (7)
▪ ADA Ramp; Pavement Area: Sign; Tree; Light Fixture; Sidewalk;
Support
o Parks and Recreation (10)
▪ Athletic Space; Fence; Park; Park Structure; Playground Equipment;
Bench; Landscape Area; Park Amenity; Playground; Tree
o Stormwater (9)
▪ Storm Basin; Storm Channel; Storm Culvert; Storm Facility; Storm
Inlet; Storm Manhole; Storm Outlet; Storm Pipe; Storm Pump
o Wastewater Collection / Sanitary Sewer (7)
▪ Sewer Cleanout; Sewer Facility; Sewer Force Main; Sewer Lateral;
Sewer Main; Sewer Manhole; Sewer Pump
o Fleet (1)
▪ Fleet
Completion Criteria:
● Customer sign-off on ability to login and access to the sandbox.
PS-08670.2
19
Page 299 of 397
Train
Foundational Training
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to two (2) hours, on overall system
navigation and functionality to help familiarize Customer staff with the software
environment and its common functions. Training topics include:
o Dashboards
o Standard KPI/ROI Gadgets
o Logins/Permission
o Layers
o Filters
o Maps
o Grids
o System Navigation
o Views (List & Detail)
o Standard Reports
o Attachments
o Requests, Work, Assets, Resources, Reports, and Administrator Tabs
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to one (1) hour, for an overview of
Preventative Maintenance Plans.
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to one (1) hour, for an overview of Asset
Condition Manager and Advanced Inspections.
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to two (2) hours, for an overview of
Reporting.
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to two (2) hours, on OpenGov Asset
Management Esri integration functionality. Training topics include:
o OpenGov Asset Management Esri integration configuration options
o Integration functionality (basemap and feature)
o Overall Esri integration requirements, considerations, and OpenGov
recommended best practices
●Provide remote train-the-trainer training, up to two (2) hours, on OpenGov Asset
Builder. Training topics include:
o OpenGov Asset Management Administrator
▪Structure Manager
▪Library Manager
▪Layout Manager
▪User/Role Configurations
o OpenGov recommended best practices for expanding the system’s use
and/or building assets
PS-08670.2
20
Page 300 of 397
OpenGov assumptions:
●OpenGov assumes that the customer is responsible for testing its workflows, automations,
integrations, and configurations within the EAM and will update the configurations as part
of its testing and training activities.
Train the Trainer Training Event
●Provide a three-day (3-day) onsite "train-the-trainer" training event. The training
agenda will be defined and agreed upon by both OpenGov and Customer project
manager. To avoid redundancy, and to utilize service time efficiently, training may
cover a subset of the assets listed in the Asset section of the scope. Topics may
include any of the following:
o Request Management:
▪Requests
▪Requesters
▪Task Creation from Requests
▪Issue library (including settings such as Applies to Asset and
Non-Location)
▪OpenGov recommended best practices for Request and Requester
Management
o Work Management:
▪Create Task(s) (Asset/Non-Asset)
▪Assignments (Add, Edit, Remove)
▪Task Menu Actions
▪Related Work Items
▪Create Work Order
▪Associate Task to WO
▪Repeat Work Orders
▪Work Order Menu Actions
▪Enter Resources
▪Timesheets
▪Activity library (including settings such as Applies to Asset,
Inspection, Key Dates, Cost, and Productivity)
▪OpenGov recommended best practices for Work Management
o Asset Management:
▪Asset Details
▪Preventative Maintenance Plans
▪Inspections
▪Linked assets (if applicable)
▪Container/Component Relationships (if applicable)
▪OpenGov recommended best practices for Asset Management
o Resource Management:
▪Resource Details
▪Labor/Equipment Rates
▪Material Management (Stock, Usage, Adjustments)
▪Vendor Price Quotes
▪OpenGov recommended best practices for Resource Management
o OpenGov Mobile:
PS-08670.2
21
Page 301 of 397
▪ Overall system functionality (Navigation, Interface, Maps,
Attachments, Sorting)
▪ Work Management
● Create and Update Tasks (Asset/Non-Asset)
● Assign Tasks
● Enter Resources
● Inspections
▪ Asset Management
● Create and Update Assets
▪ Request Management
● View and Update Requests
● View Requester information
● Create Task from Request
▪ OpenGov recommended best practices for mobile device use
o Fleet Management:
▪ Preventative Maintenance
▪ Task Management
▪ Vehicle Replacement Ratings (VRR) Equipment Detail information
▪ Fleet Reports
▪ OpenGov recommended best practices for Fleet Management
o Administrator:
▪ Administrator:
● User Administration, Role Administration, Asset Administration,
Record Filter Administration, Import/Export, Scheduled Process
Log, Error Log
▪ Settings:
● System Settings, Map Administration, Geocode Settings, GIS
Integration settings, Asset Color Manager
▪ Manager:
● Layout Manager, Library Manager, Preventative Maintenance, Asset
Condition Manager, Notification Manager, Structure Manager,
Automation
● Manager
Core Training:
● Provide Preventative Maintenance Plans remote train-the-trainer training, up to
three (3) hours. Training topics include:
o Preventative Maintenance
o OpenGov recommended best practices for proactive asset management
● Provide Advanced Inspections, Asset Condition Manager, and Asset Risk remote
train-the-trainer training, up to four (4) hours. Training topics include:
o Performance Management
▪ Prediction Groups
▪ Minimum Condition Groups
▪ Activities and Impacts
PS-08670.2
22
Page 302 of 397
▪ Criticality Factor
▪ Install/Replaced Dates
o Business Risk Exposure
▪ Risk
▪ Consequence of Failure
▪ Probability of Failure
o OpenGov recommended best practices for Asset Risk Functionality ,
advanced inspections and condition management
● Provide Internal Request remote train-the-trainer training, up to two (2) hours.
Training topics include:
o Internal Requests
▪ Users
▪ Views
▪ Issue Library settings and management
o OpenGov recommended best practices for advanced request management
● Provide Advanced Material Management and Material Planning remote
train-the-trainer training, up to four (4) hours. Training topics include:
● Material Locations
● Material Transfers
● Material Orders
● Settings:
o Vendor Price Quotes
o Re-order points
● Material Planning
o Status Default
o Workflow Setup
o Notifications
● OpenGov recommended best practices for advanced material management
and Material Planning.
Completion Criteria
● Core Training and train-the-trainer has been conducted.
Launch
OpenGov will:
● Provide remote, up to eight (8) hours, web conferences, of working sessions to answer any
questions following solution acceptance.
Completion Criteria:
● Go Live Support has been conducted.
PS-08670.2
23
Page 303 of 397
OpenGov Master Services Agreement
The parties to this Master Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) are OpenGov, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“OpenGov”), and the customer named in the signature block below (“Customer”). This
Agreement, which becomes effective when fully executed (the “Effective Date”), sets forth the
terms and conditions under which OpenGov will provide its products and services to Customer.
1. Definitions
1.1. “Customer Data” means the data that is provided by Customer to OpenGov pursuant to
this Agreement (for example, by email or through Customer ’s software systems of
record), including any data transmitted through the Software Services.
1.2. “Documentation” means any written, electronic, or online materials produced by
OpenGov, and made available to Customer in connection with the Software Ser vices,
including user guides, training materials, FAQs, and technical support content, but
excluding Product Documentation.
1.3. “Intellectual Property Rights” means all past, present, and future intellectual property
rights including those associated with works of authorship, copyrights, moral rights,
trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, patent rights, and any other proprietary rights
in intellectual property of every kind and nature.
1.4. “Order Form” means the document(s) separately executed by the parties or attached as
an exhibit, that specifies the Software Services and the Professional Services that
OpenGov will provide to Customer. All such Order Form(s) are incorporated into this
Agreement by reference.
1.5. “Product Documentation” means the technical specifications that describe the features,
functionality, configuration, and intended operation of the Software Services located at
https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/agreement-product-documentation, which is
incorporated into this Agreement by reference.
1.6. "Professional Services" means the implementation, configuration, training, consulting, or
other professional services provided by OpenGov or its authorized partners, and
identified in the applicable Statement of Work.
1.7. "Software Services" means the commercial-off-the-shelf software products and
services provided by OpenGov and identified in the applicable Order Form.
1.8. “Statement of Work” or “SOW” means the document(s) separately executed by the parties
or attached as an exhibit to this Agreement or any applicable Order Form, that specifies
the Professional Services that OpenGov will provide to Customer. All such SOW(s) are
incorporated into this Agreement by reference.
2. Software Services and Professional Services
2.1. Software Services.
1
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 304 of 397
2.1.1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OpenGov will use
commercially reasonable efforts to provide the Software Services.
2.1.2. Support and Service Levels. Customer support is available by email to
support@opengov.com or by using the chat messaging functionality of the Software
Services. Customer may report issues any time; however, OpenGov will address
issues during business hours. OpenGov will provide the applicable level of support in
accordance with the Support and Software Service Levels located at
https://opengov.com/service-sla, which is incorporated into this Agreement by
reference.
2.2. Professional Services.
2.2.1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OpenGov will use
commercially reasonable efforts to provide the Professional Services, if applicable.
Unless otherwise specified in the SOW, any pre-paid Professional Services must be
utilized within one year from the Effective Date.
2.2.2. Travel Expenses for Professional Services. Travel expenses, if any, will be set forth in
the applicable Order Form or SOW. Any additional travel expenses shall be subject to
Customer’s prior written approval and will be reimbursable by Customer.
3.Restrictions and Responsibilities
3.1. Restrictions. Customer may not use the Software Services in any manner or for any
purpose other than as expressly permitted by the Agreement. In addition, Customer shall
not, and shall not knowingly or negligently, permit or enable any third party to: (a) use or
access any of the Software Services to build a competitive product or service; (b)
modify, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or otherwise make any derivative use
of the Software Services (except to the extent applicable laws specifically prohibit such
restriction); (c) sell, license, rent, lease, assign, distribute, display, host, disclose,
outsource, copy or otherwise commercially exploit the Software Services; (d) perform or
disclose any benchmarking or performance testing of the Software Services, including
but not limited to load testing or stress testing; (e) remove any proprietary notices
included with the Software Services; (f) use the Software Services in violation of
applicable law; or (g) transfer any personal, sensitive, or personally identifiable
information to OpenGov in a manner that violates Customer's obligations under the Data
Processing Addendum.
3.2. Responsibilities. Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining
computers, third-party software systems of record, and application programming
interfaces needed to connect to, access, or otherwise use the Software Services.
Customer shall also be responsible for: (a) ensuring that such equipment is compatible
with the Software Services, (b) maintaining the security of such equipment, user
accounts, passwords and files, in accordance with industry standards, and (c) all uses of
Customer user accounts by any party other than OpenGov. OpenGov is not responsible
for the operation, support, or security of any third-party software, systems, or services
2
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 305 of 397
not provided by OpenGov.
3.3. Data Processing Addendum. To the extent OpenGov processes any Customer Data that
contains personal information, personally identifiable information, or sensitive personal
information on behalf of Customer in the course of providing the Software Services and
Professional Services under this Agreement, the parties agree to comply with the terms
of the Data Processing Addendum, located at
https://opengov.com/data-processing-addendum, which is incorporated into this
Agreement by reference.
4.Intellectual Property Rights; License Grants; Access to Customer Data
4.1. OpenGov’s Intellectual Property Rights. OpenGov exclusively owns and retains all right,
title, and interest to the Software Services, Professional Services, Documentation, and
Product Documentation, including all Intellectual Property Rights therein. This includes,
without limitation, all underlying technology, software, user interfaces, visual design
elements (such as the “look and feel”), custom fonts, graphics, workflows, button icons,
and any derivative works (e.g., enhancements, modifications, or corrections), including
but not limited to those that are created in connection with or through the use of the
Software Services, Professional Services, Documentation, or Product Documentation.
Customer may not reproduce, modify, distribute, or create derivative works based on any
part of the Software Services, in whole or in part, without OpenGov’s prior written
consent.
4.2. License Grant to Customer. OpenGov grants Customer a non-exclusive,
non-transferable, non-sublicensable, royalty-free license to use the Software Services,
Documentation, and Product Documentation during the Term for its internal use and the
purpose as described in this Agreement. No additional rights or licenses shall be
deemed granted.
4.3. Customer’s Intellectual Property Rights. Customer retains all right, title, and interest,
including all Intellectual Property Rights, in and to Customer Data. Customer grants
OpenGov and its authorized partners (such as cloud hosting providers) a non-exclusive,
royalty-free license to access, use, store, edit, reformat and otherwise process
Customer Data for the purpose of providing, maintaining, developing, and improving
OpenGov’s products and services.
4.4. Aggregated and Anonymized Data. Customer agrees that OpenGov and its authorized
partners may use aggregated and anonymized data derived from Customer Data to
provide, maintain, develop, and improve OpenGov’s products and services, to provide
general customer service support and improvements, and to perform data and usage
analytics. Any insights, developments, or improvements arising from such aggregated,
anonymized data shall be owned by OpenGov.
4.5. Access to Customer Data. Customer may download Customer Data from the Software
Services at any time during the Term, excluding during routine software maintenance
periods. For a period of 30 days after expiration of the Term, Customer may request that
3
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 306 of 397
OpenGov complete a one-time transfer of Customer Data in a format customarily used in
the industry at OpenGov’s then-current hourly rate.
4.6. Deletion of Customer Data. Unless otherwise requested pursuant to this Section 4.6,
upon the termination of this Agreement, Customer Data shall be deleted pursuant to
OpenGov’s standard data deletion and retention practices, which is to delete Customer
Data 45 days after termination or expiration of the Agreement. Upon written request,
Customer may request deletion of Customer Data prior to the date of termination of this
Agreement, in accordance with the notice requirements set forth in Section 10.2.
4.7. Feedback. “Feedback” means any suggestions, comments, ideas, recommendations,
usage, or other input provided by Customer to OpenGov regarding the services.
Customer grants OpenGov a non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual,
worldwide license to use such Feedback in the Software Services, Professional Services,
Documentation and Product Documentation. OpenGov will exclusively own all right, title,
and interest, including all Intellectual Property Rights, in and to any improvements,
modifications, or derivative works to the Software Services, Professional Services,
Documentation or Product Documentation that are based on or derived from such
Feedback.
5.Confidentiality
5.1. “Confidential Information" means all confidential business, technical, and financial
information of the disclosing party that is marked as “Confidential” or an equivalent
designation or that should reasonably be understood to be confidential given the nature
of the information and/or the circumstances surrounding the disclosure. OpenGov’s
Confidential Information includes, without limitation, the software underlying the
Software Services, Documentation, and Product Documentation.
5.2. Confidential Information does not include information that: (a) was publicly known or
becomes publicly known through no breach of this Agreement by the receiving party; (b)
is required to be disclosed upon request under any applicable federal, state, or local
public records laws; (c) Customer expressly directs OpenGov make publicly available; (d)
was lawfully known to the receiving party without restriction on disclosure before
receipt from the disclosing party; (e) is disclosed to the receiving party by a third party
who has the right to make such disclosure without restriction; or (f) is independently
developed by the receiving party without access to the disclosing party’s Confidential
Information.
5.3. Each party agrees to use the other's Confidential Information only in connection with
this Agreement. Each party further agrees to protect the other party's Confidential
Information using the measures that it employs with respect to its own Confidential
Information of a similar nature, but in no event with less than reasonable care. If a party
is required to disclose Confidential Information by law, subpoena, or court order, it must,
to the extent legally permitted, promptly notify the other party in writing prior to the
disclosure to give the other party an opportunity to oppose or limit the disclosure.
4
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 307 of 397
6. Term and Termination
6.1. Agreement Term. This Agreement begins on the Effective Date and will remain in effect
until the termination or expiration of all active Order Forms entered into under this
Agreement (“Term”), unless earlier terminated pursuant to this Section 6.
6.2. Renewal. Each Order Form shall automatically renew for additional terms equal in
duration to its initial term (each, a “Renewal Term”), unless either party provides written
notice of non-renewal at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term.
6.3. Termination for Cause. If either party materially breaches this Agreement and fails to
cure such breach within 30 days after receiving written notice by the non-breaching
party, the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement.
6.4. Termination for Non-Appropriation. If required by applicable law, Customer may
terminate this Agreement if it does not appropriate funds for a future fiscal year. In order
to terminate for non-appropriation, Customer must provide at least 30 days’ prior written
notice, provided it is after the first full year of the Agreement. Obligations to pay fees are
non-cancelable, and payments are non-refundable. This section may not be used as a
substitute for termination for convenience.
6.5. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 6: (a)
Customer shall pay in full for all of the Software Services and Professional Ser vices for
the then-current annual term; (b) OpenGov shall stop providing the Software Services
and the Professional Services to Customer; and (c) with the exception of Customer Data,
the return and deletion of which are addressed in Section 4, each party shall, upon
request of the other party, return or delete any of the other party ’s Confidential
Information.
7. Payment of Fees
7.1. Fees; Invoicing; Payment; Expenses.
7.1.1. Fees. Fees for the Software Services and Professional Services are set forth in the
applicable Order Form, and OpenGov will invoice Customer accordingly. Customer
agrees to pay invoices within 30 days of receipt. Invoices are deemed received when
OpenGov emails them to Customer ’s designated billing contact. Obligations to pay
fees are non-cancelable, and payments are non-refundable, except as expressly
provided in Sections 8.1.2 and 8.1.3.
7.1.2. Annual Software Price Adjustment. OpenGov shall increase the fees for the Software
Ser vices during any Renewal Term by 5% each year or as otherwise agreed upon in
the applicable renewal Order Form.
7.1.3. Travel Expenses. OpenGov will invoice Customer for travel expenses provided in the
SOW or Order Form as they are incurred. Customer shall pay all such valid invoices
within 30 days of receipt of invoice. Receipts shall be provided for the travel
expenses listed on the invoice.
5
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 308 of 397
7.2. Consequences of Non-Payment. If Customer fails to make any payments required under
any Order Form or SOW, then in addition to any other rights OpenGov may have under
this Agreement or applicable law: (a) Customer will owe a late interest penalty of the
maximum rate permitted by law; and (b) if Customer’s account remains delinquent (with
respect to payment of an undisputed invoice) for 10 days after receipt of a delinquency
notice from OpenGov, which may be provided via email to Customer’s designated billing
contact, OpenGov may temporarily suspend Customer’s access to the Software Service
for up to 90 days to pursue good faith negotiations before pursuing termination in
accordance with Section 6.3. Customer will continue to incur and owe all applicable
fees irrespective of any such service suspension based on such Customer’s
delinquency.
7.3. Taxes. Each party is responsible for the tax effects this Agreement imposes upon it. If
Customer is tax-exempt, it will provide OpenGov its tax exemption certificate.
8.Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer
8.1. By OpenGov.
8.1.1. General Warranty. OpenGov represents and warrants that it has all right and authority
necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement.
8.1.2. Professional Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that the
Professional Services, if any, will be performed in a professional and workmanlike
manner in accordance with the related SOW and generally prevailing industry
standards. For any breach of the Professional Services warranty, OpenGov will
re-perform the applicable services. If OpenGov is unable to re-perform such work as
warranted, Customer will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the
deficient work. Customer must give written notice of any claim under this warranty
to OpenGov within 90 days of the completion of the Professional Services pursuant
to the applicable SOW to receive such warranty remedies.
8.1.3. Software Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that for the
Term, the Software Services will perform in all material respects in accordance with
the then-current Product Documentation. The foregoing warranty does not apply to
(a)any Software Services that have been used in a manner other than as set forth in
this Agreement, or (b) any pre-release features, functionality, or beta software
services that Customer elects to use in the beta phase of development. For any
breach of the Software Services warranty, OpenGov will repair or replace any
nonconforming Software Services so that the affected portion of the Software
Services operates as warranted. If OpenGov is unable to do so, Customer may
terminate the Agreement and will be entitled to a refund of the pre-paid, unused
portion of the fees from the date of the discovery of the defect. Customer must give
written notice of any claim under this warranty to OpenGov within 90 days of
Customer discovering the defect to receive such warranty remedies.
8.2. By Customer. Customer represents and warrants that (a) it has all right and authority
necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement and (b) OpenGov’s use of Customer
6
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 309 of 397
Data pursuant to this Agreement will not infringe, violate or misappropriate Intellectual
Property Rights of any third party.
8.3. Disclaimer. OPENGOV DOES NOT WARR ANT THAT THE SOFTWARE SERVICES WILL BE
UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE; NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARR ANTY AS TO THE
RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SOFTWARE SERVICES. EXCEPT
AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 8, THE SOFTWARE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”
AND OPENGOV DISCL AIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARR ANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICUL AR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.
9. Limitation of Liability
9.1. By Type. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS SUPPLIERS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES,
REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE OR
LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT UNDER ANY
CONTR ACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY: (A) FOR ERROR OR
INTERRUPTION OF USE OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR COST OF
PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR LOSS OF BUSINESS; (B) FOR
ANY INDIRECT, EXEMPL ARY, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES; OR (C) FOR ANY MATTER BEYOND A PARTY’S REASONABLE CONTROL, EVEN
IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.
9.2. By Amount. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY’S AGGREGATE, CUMUL ATIVE LIABILITY
FOR ANY CL AIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY REL ATED TO THIS AGREEMENT
EXCEED THE FEES PAID OR PAYABLE BY CUSTOMER TO OPENGOV FOR THE SOFTWARE
SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE
RISE TO THE LIABILITY.
9.3. Limitation of Liability Exclusions. The limitations of liability set forth in Sections 9.1 and
9.2 above do not apply to, and each party accepts liability to the other for: (a) claims
arising out of fraud or willful misconduct by either party; (b) either party ’s infringement
of the other party ’s Intellectual Property Rights; (c) breach of obligations under Section
3.1; and (d) payment obligations under this Agreement.
9.4. No Limitation of Liability by Law. Because some jurisdictions do not allow liability or
damages to be limited to the extent set forth above, some of the above limitations may
not apply.
10. Miscellaneous
10.1. Logo Use. OpenGov shall have the right to use and display Customer ’s logos and trade
names for marketing and promotional purposes in OpenGov ’s website and marketing
materials, subject to Customer ’s trademark usage guidelines provided to OpenGov.
10.2. Notice. Ordinary day-to-day operational communications may be conducted by email,
live chat or telephone. For notices required by the Agreement the parties must
communicate more formally in a writing sent via USPS certified mail and via email.
OpenGov ’s addresses for notice are: legal@opengov.com with a mailed copy to OpenGov,
7
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 310 of 397
Inc., 660 3rd Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94107.
10.3. Anti-corruption. Neither OpenGov nor any of its employees or agents has offered or
provided any illegal or improper payment, gift, or transfer of value in connection with this
Agreement. The parties will promptly notify each other if they become aware of any
violation of any applicable anti-corruption laws in connection with this Agreement.
10.4. Injunctive Relief. The parties acknowledge that any breach of the confidentiality
provisions or the unauthorized use of a party’s intellectual property may result in serious
and irreparable injury to the aggrieved party for which damages may not adequately
compensate the aggrieved party. The parties agree, therefore, that, in addition to any
other remedy that the aggrieved party may have, it shall be entitled to seek equitable
injunctive relief without being required to post a bond or other surety or to prove either
actual damages or that damages would be an inadequate remedy.
10.5. Force Majeure. Neither party will be liable for any delay or failure to perform its
obligations under this Agreement, due to any events beyond its reasonable control,
including but not limited to acts of god, acts of governmental authority, war, riot, labor
disputes, failures of performance by any third-party services, utilities, or equipment
failures, or any other events beyond the party’s reasonable control. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Customer shall remain obligated to perform its obligations under Section 7.1.1.
10.6. Severability; Waiver. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or
invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so
that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. Any
express waiver or failure to exercise promptly any right under this Agreement will not
create a continuing waiver or any expectation of non-enforcement.
10.7. Survival. The following sections of this Agreement shall survive termination or
expiration: Section 5 (Confidentiality), Section 7 (Payment of Fees), Section 4.6 (Deletion
of Customer Data), Section 8.3 (Warranty Disclaimer), Section 9 (Limitation of Liability),
and Section 10 (Miscellaneous).
10.8. Assignment. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement. Neither party may
assign, or otherwise transfer this Agreement without the other party's written consent,
which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may assign, without such consent but upon
written notice, its rights and obligations under this Agreement to its corporate a liate
or to any entity that acquires all or substantially all of its capital stock or its assets
related to this Agreement, through purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise. Any
other attempted assignment shall be void. This Agreement will benefit and bind
permitted assigns and successors.
10.9. Independent Contractors. This Agreement does not create an agency, partnership, joint
venture, or employment relationship, and neither party has any authority to bind the
other.
10.10. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of
8
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 311 of 397
Customer’s jurisdiction, without regard to conflict of laws principles. The parties submit
to personal jurisdiction and venue in the courts of Customer’s jurisdiction.
10.11. Complete Agreement. OpenGov has made no other promises or representations to
Customer other than those contained in this Agreement. Any additional or different
terms in a purchase order or click-through agreement are expressly rejected by the
parties and are void. Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed
by an authorized representative of each party. No third parties are authorized to modify
this Agreement. If there is a conflict between this Agreement and any other attached or
incorporated document, the terms of this Agreement will control unless expressly stated
otherwise.
Customer: ________________________ OpenGov, Inc.
Signature ________________________ Signature __________________________
Name ________________________ Name __________________________
Title ________________________ Title __________________________
Date ________________________ Date __________________________
9
OpenGov Master Services Agreement Revised May 5, 2025
Page 312 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
9.b
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Municipal Campus Building Project - Resolution 2025-93 Ordering the
Improvement and Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for
the Construction of a new Police Department and City Hall Building
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
Kelly McCarthy, Police Chief
ACTION REQUEST:
ICS Consulting, Inc. will present findings from the Municipal Campus Project condition
assessment and space needs study. The city council is asked to adopt Resolution 2025-93
Ordering the Improvement and Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the
Construction of a new Police Department and City Hall Building. Adoption will allow the
project to proceed to the next phase.
BACKGROUND:
The Mendota Heights municipal campus, home to the city’s police department and city hall
offices, serves as a symbol of local identity and plays a vital role in the community. After nearly
40 years, the building’s design and systems are outdated and inefficient, and available space
no longer supports current operational needs or the level of service expected by the
community.
In September 2020, the City Council approved a contract with CNH Architects to complete a
facility needs analysis. The goal was to provide evidence-based recommendations that
address the physical building's needs, as well as the operational needs of the Police
Department, City Administration/City Hall, and the citizens of Mendota Heights. Analysis
results were presented during an April 2021 city council work session.
While the next phase of planning was initially delayed due to the Pandemic’s impact on the
construction market, including rising costs of materials and labor, the project remained a
priority. As part of the City Council’s 2021-2022 strategic initiatives, funding was allocated to
develop shelf-ready plans for the building’s expansion and renovation.
In March 2025, the city council identified addressing the police department and city hall needs
Page 313 of 397
as its top strategic priority and approved a contract with ICS to complete a facility condition
assessment and space utilization study. ICS presented preliminary findings in August, noting
that the existing facility does not meet current operational needs, that renovation costs would
exceed industry standards relative to new construction, and that the building has safety and
security concerns for both the public and staff. They noted that while the existing City
Hall/Police Department facility has served the city well for decades, the current facilities face
challenges:
•Health and Safety Issues: Mold, water intrusion, and vermin compromise the building
environment.
•Infrastructure Limitations: Aging systems and insufficient space hinder efficient
operations and public service delivery.
•Security Vulnerabilities: Single entry points and outdated layouts create safety risks.
•Accessibility Barriers: Spaces are difficult to navigate for people of all abilities.
Following these findings, the City Council directed staff and ICS to analyze the feasibility of
available paths:
•Renovating and adding on the needed space to the existing building
•Building a new police station and renovating city hall
•Building a new police station and city hall (in one building)
The analysis of these options was presented in early October. A key component of the
Council’s discussion was the importance of engaging the community throughout the project. A
city open house, introducing the project to the community, was held in late October and
information has been included on the city’s social media channels, publications and website.
As findings and information have been presented, the City Council has continued to evaluate
potential solutions for the municipal campus, including whether to locate a future facility
elsewhere in the city and whether to address only immediate needs or plan for long-term
growth through a “dig-once” approach. Analysis focused on two primary options, both at the
current site: meeting immediate operational needs or implementing a “dig-once” approach to
accommodate long-term requirements and reduce the need for future major construction.
Based on the analysis, the Council indicated its direction to proceed with the dig-once
approach.
[Mendota Heights Municipal Campus Project website:
https://mendotaheightsmn.gov/550/Mendota-Heights-Municipal-Campus-Project]
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The preliminary “dig once” scope presented by ICS Consulting carries an early cost estimate of
$33.1 million. Ehlers, the City’s financial advisor, has modeled potential tax impacts based on a
range of possible project costs; however, the actual tax impact cannot be determined until a
final project scope and cost are established. The City will continue to refine the project details
and evaluate financial implications as planning progresses.
Page 314 of 397
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Res. 2025-93 Muncipal Campus Project Approval
2. City of Mendota Heights City Hall- Police Station Report Final 12122025
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 315 of 397
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-93
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW POLICE
DEPARTMENT AND CITY HALL BUILDING
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights (“City”) has determined that
improvements are needed for a new Municipal Campus Project, including facility space needs for the
Police Department and City Hall staff; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are necessary to protect the health, safety, and general welfare
of the community and staff, and support long-term infrastructure planning; and
WHEREAS, the City’s consulting firm, ICS Consulting, Inc., has presented a preliminary scope and
estimated cost for the project of $33,100,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that:
1.The new Municipal Campus Construction Project is hereby ordered to proceed.
2.The City Administrator and Mayor are authorized to execute AIA contract documents B132 and
C132 (program management, design and construction management) with the City’s professional
services consultant, ICS Consulting, Inc. (ICS) for the implementation of the identified
improvements.
3.Upon fully executed AIA contracts between the city and ICS, the City's partner, ICS Consulting,
Inc. is directed to begin design services for the project and take all necessary steps to prepare for
bidding in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and/or applicable procurement laws.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 16th day of December, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 316 of 397
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118
City Hall & Police Station
Facility Condition Assessment Report
& Space Utilization Study
December 10th, 2025
1331 Tyler Street NE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
Ph: (763) 354-2670 / Fax: (763) 780-2866 / ics-builds.com
Page 317 of 397
City Hall & Police Station Facility Condition Assessment Page 0 of 76 Table of Contents: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PURPOSE OF THE FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2
EXPECTED USEFUL LIFE 3 ASSET CONDITION RATINGS 4 ASSET PRIORITY LEVEL 5 COST ESTIMATING 5 FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) 6
LIMITATIONS OF LONG-RANGE PLANNING 6
EXISTING FACILITY DESCRIPTION 7 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT OBSERVATIONS 9
FACILITY ENERGY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 11 THOUGHTEXCHANGE 15 SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY 16 APPENDICES: APPENDIX A – ThoughtExchange 33 APPENDIX B – Preliminary Programming 67
APPENDIX C – Itemized Asset List & CIP Budgets 73 Note:
Additionally, additional information related to findi ngs of the FCA, Programming
and Solutions that have been investigated can be found in PowerPoint
presentations given to the City Council at Council Work shop Meetings Page 318 of 397
Page 1 of 76 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report addresses the long-term facility maintenance needs identified during the site visit, and discussions with city maintenance staff, and presents a potential Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the City Hall & Police Department. A facility condition assessment (FCA) was conducted on April 30th, 2025. The building was constructed in 1987 and is 38 years old at the time of this assessment. The building’s total area is 19,900 ft2. It appears to have been well maintained and structurally sound for a residential grade building and upgrades and repairs have been made as the facility has aged, however, some infrastructure systems are original to each portion of the building’s construction or upgrade project and have exceeded their expected useful service life. The facility components assessed in this report are given a condition rating of good, fair, poor, or critical based on its maintenance history, discussions with maintenance personnel, age with respect to expected useful life, and physical appearance, respectively. The distribution of the condition ratings for the assets at this facility is presented in the following diagram: A description of this facility, an itemized list of the systems assessed along with their condition, and the timing and budget for addressing deficiencies are detailed in this report. 31%34%33%2%Asset Condition Rating BreakdownGoodFairPoorCriticalPage 319 of 397
Page 2 of 76 PURPOSE OF THE FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT: The purpose of this facility condition assessment (F CA) is to identify existing and anticipated
major facility deficiencies and to serve as a guide to the city for making near-term facility
maintenance investment decisions and to develop a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to ensure
that the facility functions safely and effectively for its remaining useful life. The findings in this
report will suggest levels of funding and timelines tied to budget for making facility investments
and replacing components before failure over the next ten years.
FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY: To gather pertinent physical information about each building and site, the ICS team conducted
visual inspections of facilities, observed existing conditions, spoke with maintenance personnel,
recorded notes, reviewed available construction documentation, and took photographs for later
evaluation.
An onsite comprehensive evaluation of the physical needs of major components was completed
including the: •Exterior Envelope (walls, panels, roofing, windows, doors)
•Interior Finishes (walls, flooring, ceilings, doors, hardware, casework)
•Plumbing Systems (domestic water/waste pipe, fixtures, water heating/conditioning)
•Mechanical Systems (heating, ventilation, air conditioning, filtration/treatment)
•Electrical Systems (distribution, end-use, lighting, emergency power)
•Life Safety Systems (fire alarm, fire sprinkler, public address, egress)
•ADA Compliance
•Site Infrastructure (sidewalks, curbs, lots, drives, structures)
Limited to visual inspection, performance of systems was not specifically measured and
evaluated. Any mention of performance in this report is a result of anecdotal evidence such as
conversations with staff or based on professional experience. If more in-depth evaluation is
desired, ICS can assist in facilitating these studies.
Conditions of items not viewable (under slab, in walls, above ceilings, confined spaces, etc.) are
not physically assessed. If so desired, additional testing and evaluation of these items could be
performed by other methods. Unless requested, ICS does not assess the condition of movable
furnishings, fixtures, and equipment, or technology.
As a result of research and the site visits, the ICS team has organized and analyzed the collected
data to calculate cost estimates to maintain, repair, or replace facility assets, and site
infrastructure for a 10-year study period. In most cases, the plan assumes like-for-like
replacement and does not consider upgrades or enhancements.
This plan is a snapshot in time and is intended to be a living document, in which the ICS team will
work with you to update it as needed and organize projects based on your priorities and funding
availability. Page 320 of 397
Page 3 of 76 EXPECTED USEFUL LIFE: The expected useful life of an asset is based on industry-accepted statistical averages. This expected useful life can vary significantly based upon the quality of materials and workmanship when the asset was manufactured or installed, the level of maintenance performed over time on the asset, climate where the asset is located, conditions the asset is exposed to, and the use cycles of the asset. The Bathtub Curve of Product Reliability (shown below) is a statistical model that holds true for all assets. Early in an asset’s life, there can be a high failure rate “while the kinks are worked out”. This period is also known as the “warranty period” and is the reason products and services are typically provided with a guarantee that a product will be repaired or replaced, or that a service issue will be resolved, for a specified period after the product or service is purchased. This failure rate reduces over time and moves into a stable state as its “useful life” begins. This period of constant failure rate can be extended for many assets through proactive maintenance and strategic replacement of subcomponents. Eventually, regardless of the level of maintenance performed, wear is inevitable, and an asset begins to fail more frequently as it enters its “end-of-life” period. It is estimated that for every dollar spent on proactive maintenance during the useful-life period, deferring maintenance will cost five to ten times more once the asset is at the end-of-life period. Page 321 of 397
Page 4 of 76 ASSET CONDITION RATING: An “Asset” is the term used for an individual piece of equipment, material, system or collection thereof. The condition rating of an asset is determined from the facility condition assessment based on its maintenance history, discussions with maintenance personnel, age with respect to expected useful life, and physical appearance, respectively. The asset condition ratings used in this report are defined as follows: Good = New or in the first 1/3 of its expected use life. The equipment, material, or system is in good to excellent condition, but some elements may show signs of general wear. Safe and reliable with minimal risk of failure. Fair = In the second 1/3 of its expected useful life. The equipment, material, or system is in fair to good condition, shows general signs of wear. Some elements exhibit deficiencies in conditions and functionality, increasing their vulnerability to failure. Poor = In the last 1/3 of its expected useful life. The equipment, material, or system is in poor to fair condition and below standard, with elements approaching the end of their service life. A large portion of the system exhibits significant deterioration with a strong risk of failure. Critical = Major repair or replacement of the equipment, material, or system is required to restore its function. A critical condition rating is typically used for assets that have an imminent negative impact on occupant health/safety, city’s mission, or occupant experience. The distribution of the condition ratings for the assets at this facility is presented in the following diagram: 31%34%33%2%Asset Condition Rating BreakdownGoodFairPoorCriticalPage 322 of 397
Page 5 of 76 ASSET PRIORITY LEVEL: A “Priority Level” is assigned subjectively to assets to help determine the timing of addressing its deficiency. The priority ratings used in this report are defined as follows: Priority 1 = Scheduled to be addressed in the next 0 – 2 years. Resolves an immediate negative impact on occupant health/safety, city’s mission, asset reliability/serviceability, or student experience. Priority 2 = Scheduled to be addressed in the next 2 – 4 years. Minimizes the potential to negatively impact occupant health/safety, city’s mission, asset reliability/serviceability, or student experience. Priority 3 = Scheduled to be addressed in the next 4 – 6 years. Mitigates asset deterioration and/or reduces operating costs by extending asset longevity. Priority 4 = Scheduled to be addressed in the next 6+ years. Impacts the student experience by improving aesthetics or expanded accessibility. The priority levels defined above are guidelines only. The timing to address an asset’s deficiency can be accelerated if its impact on the city’s mission is thought to be more likely or its condition should be addressed sooner. Conversely, the opposite timing philosophy can also be applied. COST ESTIMATING: ICS uses our proprietary software, CIP 360, to catalog and estimate costs to address current deficiencies and project future improvement budgets. The cost database is maintained by ICS to remain current. Budgets presented in this report reflect annual inflation and regional cost adjustments indicative of recent real project bids and current pricing data that are comparative to the projects listed, but not specifically for that project. The recommended timing of the projects is based on interviews with staff, the expected useful life of the equipment or materials used, and the observed physical condition of the equipment or materials. Page 323 of 397
Page 6 of 76 FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI):
The "Facility Condition Index"(FCI) represents a useful measurement of the amount of
the facility’s needs compared to the estimated replacement value for that building.
Therefore, the higher this ratio, the more consideration should be given to replacing or
renovating the facility rather than investing significant repair dollars in it. A ratio greater
than 0.6 (60%) typically identifies facilities for which long-term investments should be
seriously considered before implementation. Of course, other factors weigh into
whether a building will be upgraded, repurposed, or replaced, but this measurement is
one that should be taken into account in any facility decisions. The 10-year plan
presented in this report aims to maintain the existing facility and does not consider its
available capacity or utilization efficiency. These variables should also be considered
when deciding whether to invest in maintaining the building or replacing it with a new
facility. The FCI of the facility considered in this report is presented in the following
table:
Identified CIP Needs Building Replacement Value Facility Condition
Index (FCI) $1,200,000 $10,000,000 .12 Renovation Costs Building Replacement Value Facility Condition
Index (FCI) $5,960,000 $10,000,000 .60 LIMITATIONS OF LONG-RANGE PLANNING:
The cost estimates in this report are intended to be for planning purposes only. There are
numerous factors, such as scope, intent, materials, etc., that will affect the actual cost when a
project is executed.
Many projects indicated in the plan are placeholders based on the statistical useful life and are
not certain that those items must be replaced in the year indicated. Therefore, the plan is a
living document, and ICS will work with the city to reflect the priorities, costs, and funding
availability to develop an executable capital improvement plan for the facility.
Page 324 of 397
Page 7 of 76 EXISTING FACILITY DESCRIPTION: General Overview: The Mendota Heights City Hall/Police Station is located at 1011 Victoria Curve. The facility is located on two parcels of approximately 17 acres and has a total building area of 19,900 ft2. There are two different floors in the facility. There are three parking areas along with a drop-off or drive around loop. There is a solar field adjacent to the building. Page 325 of 397
Page 8 of 76 Exterior Envelope:
• The facility is shingled with Architectural shingles. • There is electric snow melt heat tape along the eaves to limit ice buildup along the roof edge. • The windows have an aluminum-clad wood frame. • The exterior doors are a combination of hollow metal and aluminum storefront entry systems. • There are brick columns on the north side of the building supporting a concrete walking area. • The columns are covered with stone on the south side of the building, and they support the entry canopy. • The building’s exterior is covered with bricks with a concrete band board, which serves as a brick cap and transition to windows. • The building does have a vented wood soffit overhang. Interior Finishes: • The lower level has a mixture of sealed concrete floors and carpeting. The bathrooms and holding cells have ceramic tile flooring. There is carpeting in the hallways, workstation areas and some office areas. There are some areas of VCT flooring as well. • The lower-level walls appear to be painted masonry or gypsum. Rubber base is installed around the perimeters of occupied rooms. • The lower and upper levels have wood doors with round doorknobs. • The lower-level ceilings are mostly ACT. With some areas open to structure. • There are varying types and ages of casework throughout the upper and lower levels. • The upper level is covered with carpet with exceptions in the bathrooms which are ceramic tile and storage areas that have sealed concrete floors. • The upper level has ACT ceilings. With the exception of the entry area and the council area has a wood ceiling. • The upper level has some cubicles that serve as office areas. Plumbing Systems: • There are restrooms on both levels of the facility. • There is a breakroom area with a faucet on both levels. Mechanical Systems: • There are 5 air-handling units that are paired with condensing units that provide heating and cooling for the facility • There are two boilers that provide hot water for the heating. • IT and AV areas have mini splits to help control the temperature in those areas. • There is a unit heater in the garage area. • There is fin tube radiation along the exterior of the facility. Page 326 of 397
Page 9 of 76 Electrical Systems: • The panels and main transformer are original to construction. • The lighting seems to have been retrofitted to LED. • The facility does have a generator. • There is a set of solar panels to the west of the facility. Life Safety Systems and Accessibility: • Both floors have sprinkler systems. • There is an elevator that travels from floor to floor. Site Infrastructure: • The parking areas are paved with asphalt. • The sidewalks are concrete. • There are some large grass areas. GENERAL FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT OBSERVATIONS: A facility condition assessment (FCA) was conducted on April 30th, 2025. The building was constructed in 1987, thus making it 38 years old at the time of this assessment. It appears to have been well maintained and structurally sound, and upgrades and repairs have been made as the facility aged; however, some infrastructure and systems are original to each portion of the building’s construction or improvement and have exceeded their expected useful service life. A table with an itemized list of the assets included in the proposed 10-year CIP is presented in Appendix C. It details the asset location, component category, name, condition, priority level, year recommended for action and estimated budget. Following are the concerns noted, and observations made for each of the major building components during the FCA. Exterior Envelope: • The facility is shingled with Architectural shingles. These appear to be in good condition. But date of installation puts them within the 10 year plan for replacement. • The windows have an aluminum clad frame and appear to be functioning well but with replacement they would offer improved energy efficiency because of improvements in glazing technologies. The cladding does show signs of wear and fading. • There are damaged columns that require replacing bricks and tuckpointing the mortar joints that are damaged or deteriorating. These are located on the north entry canopy. This is the entrance to the police station. Page 327 of 397
Page 10 of 76 •The columns on the south side of the building supporting the entry canopy have some
cracked stone that need to be replaced. This is the entrance into the city hall.
•There appears to be evidence of water infiltration on the southwest side of the building.
No evidence of any infiltration at time of assessment.Interior Finishes: •Carpeting has reached life expectancy and should be replaced. Life expectancy is 5-10
years.Plumbing Systems: •Plumbing seems to be in good condition.
•Water heater will need to be replaced in about 10 years. Life expectancy is 10-15 years.
•Building seems to lack ADA restrooms.Mechanical Systems: •The air handler units have exceeded life expectancy. Replacement would improve air
quality as well as efficiency. Life expectancy is 25-30 years. The coils inside the air
handler’s life expectancy are 20 years.
•The condensing units for the air handlers will be in need of replacement within the next
10 years; life expectancy is 20 years.
•Both boilers and circulating pumps are original to the building, life expectancy is 25-30
years on the boilers and 15-25 years on the circulating pumps.
•Electrical Systems: •Seems to be in good condition. Nothing stood out at time of assessment.Life Safety Systems and Accessibility: •Continue inspections and maintenance on the sprinkler risers and pumps.
•Continue inspections and maintenance on elevator.Site Infrastructure: •Parking areas are in need of repaving.
•Repave the Northeast, Northwest and the South parking lots along with the drive areas.
A photo tour of deficiencies of the major system components at the facility is presented in Appendix D. Page 328 of 397
Page 11 of 76 The following table and graph present a 10-year breakdown of the estimated CIP costs by year respectively. Anticipated budgets do not include annual inflation. The 10-year CIP Plan presented in this report attempts to maintain the existing facility and does not consider its available capacity, utilization efficiency, or educational adequacy. A more efficient use of tax dollars could be to replace the facility to reset its life cycle and improve its utilization efficiency, reliability and control, provide better indoor environmental quality (temperature, humidity, ventilation, light, acoustics), increase occupant health and safety, and reduce annual operating costs through reduced maintenance and energy consumption. These variables should also be considered when deciding whether to invest in maintaining the building or replacing it with a new facility. ICS can work with the city to determine unknown variables, prioritized needs, and realize long-term options for this facility. Page 329 of 397
Page 12 of 76 FACILITY ENERGY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS: The first step to saving energy at a building is to benchmark it. That is, to measure and compare your buildings’ energy to similar buildings, past consumption, or a reference performance level. Benchmarking turns the information on your utility bills into knowledge you can act on. This section contains a summary of the facility’s energy utilization. The information presented came from the utility bills provided by the city, discussion with city personnel, visual observations of the major energy consuming systems in the building, and assumptions made when accurate information was unavailable. The variables that impact the energy use of a building most are: 1) weather; 2) operational efficiency; and 3) system efficiency, respectively. Variables 2 and 3 can be controlled by the city. The following graph presents a typical energy use profile for a building. As shown in the following table, the average annual energy consumed by this facility for 2023 and 2024 was 195,383 kilowatt-hours of electricity and 9,999 therms of natural gas. The average total annual cost of this energy was $37,308. HVAC, 44%Lighting, 28%Office Equip., 14%Dom. Hot Water, 4%Other, 10%TYPICAL BUILDING ENERGY PROFILEPage 330 of 397
Page 13 of 76 The calculated energy utilization index (EUI) of the building over this period is 83.8 kBtu/ft2/yr. This EUI was compared to those available in the U.S. EPA’s Energy Star database for similarly sized facilities located in the same climate zone in Minnesota. For comparison, the calculated EUI from the Minnesota B3 Benchmarking website is also presented. The City Hall/ Police Station operates above the 50th percentile of facilities in the database. As shown in the following graph, this indicates that by making the energy related improvements identified in this report there is potential for an annual utility saving of 40.1% at a B3 Benchmark EUI, which could equate to annual operational savings of approximately $14,960. Page 331 of 397
Page 14 of 76 Real quantifiable and non-quantifiable operational benefits can be created when making facility
upgrades. Quantifiable benefits are savings within your operating budget. The types of
quantifiable and non-quantifiable benefits are listed below:
Page 332 of 397
Page 15 of 76 THOUGHTEXCHANGE – STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT: ThoughtExchange is an AI-powered engagement and experience platform used by organizations in the public sector to gather feedback, foster inclusive decision-making, and uncover collective intelligence from large groups of people. It is designed to replace traditional, one-way surveys with a dynamic, collaborative process. The core process, known as an "Exchange," involves three main steps: Share: Participants anonymously share their thoughts or ideas in response to a broad, open-ended question posed by a leader. Rate: Participants read and rate each other's shared thoughts on a 1–5-star scale based on agreement or importance. This peer-to-peer rating system uses patented anti-bias technology to ensure ideas are judged on merit, not by who submitted them. Discover/Analyze: The platform uses AI-driven analytics to process the data in real-time, identifying key themes, priorities, and areas of common ground within the group's input. Leaders then use these insights to make informed decisions and take action. ThoughtExchange promotes honest feedback by keeping participant identities confidential from other users and exchange leaders. It allows for both real-time (synchronous) and flexible, asynchronous participation, making it accessible to diverse and geographically dispersed groups via any device. The platform also offers additional tools like traditional surveys and AI-enabled "Interviews" for more nuanced data collection. Findings for Staff and Council ThoughtExchange surveys can be found in Appendix A. Page 333 of 397
Page 16 of 76 SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY: Study Purpose: ICS was hired by the City of Mendota Heights to deve lop a facility and space
needs study of the Municipal Campus to identify current and future space needs, conditions,
and analyze various scenarios to determine if renovating or building new best meet the needs of
the city and the community. Space Needs: Identify and assess existing Municipal Campus needs and work with the City of
Mendota Heights City Staff and Police Department to understand space limitations and develop
a more ideal plan that will meet the current and future needs of the City Halland
Police Department staff at the Municipal Campus, including City Council and community needs. Investigation of Solutions: Assist the City to determine if it's more cost effec tive to build a new
Municipal Campus or stay in the same location and renovate the existing building.
Our analysis allows the City to create and manage a facilities plan while taking the necessary
steps now to implement future changes. The data collected will help shape the City's long-term
Facilities CIP while incorporating the space needs for the City Hall and Police Department staff.
Understanding current costs versus what it takes to build new, allows for Council to make
the right decision on next best steps. •Manage your budget and schedule improvements effectively.
•Prioritize your deferred maintenance and capital improvements.
•Align available funding with improvements needed.
WHY SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS MATTERS:
Understanding your facility's space needs and limita tions is more than just about square
footage. It's about aligning physical environments with purpose, people, and performance. It
allows for:
•Functionality & Efficiency
•User Experience & Comfort
•Prioritize investments and where they'll have the greatest impact
•Enables smarter resource allocation
•Promotes energy-efficiency design by reducing unnecessary space and enhancing cost
savings
•Supports a long-term vision
•Facilitates better project scope, budgeting practices, and trust with stakeholder
alignment.
Page 334 of 397
Page 17 of 76 SPACE STUDY METHODOLOGY 1. Facility Condition Assessment – Site Visits • City Hall & Police Department Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) Information and Analysis • Energy Efficiency Analysis 2. Stakeholder & Employee Engagement – Online Survey & In-person Department Meetings • Municipal Campus Department Survey • Department Head Interviews • Council Member Survey 3. Scenario Creation & Budgeting – Meetings w/ City Leadership to determine what needs to be done with the existing City Hall, Police Department Facility • Renovate or Build New? • Ehler's Tax Impact Analysis CITY HALL: UPPER-LEVEL CURRENT SPACES: • Reception Desk / Counter • Offices & Workstations • Small conference room • Shared public/staff restroom (1) • Breakroom • Small conference room in office area • Conference room open to public • Mother's room (former closet) • Council Chambers • Public/Staff balcony – no longer used • Mechanical room in lower level • Elections storage lower level Page 335 of 397
Page 18 of 76 POLICE DEPARTMENT: LOWER-LEVEL CURRENT SPACES
• Witness interview “room” (located in a cubicle within the public lobby) • Fitness Room, separated from Office by the Public Lobby • Offices • Reception / Report Area • Breakroom / Conference/Meeting Room / Court Video / Equipment Storage / Lockers • Locker Rooms • Interview Rooms; One (1) currently utilized as an Office • Garage (2 Stalls) • Evidence Storage • In-custody Holding Area MUNICIPAL CAMPUS PARKING Main Level Parking Lot: • Community & City Hall Staff – 46 Stalls + 2 Accessible Stalls • Baseball Field Parking (after hours) Lower Level Parking Lot: • Police Department (West lot) – 6 Stalls • Community & Staff (East lot) – 11 Stalls + 1 Accessible Stall Page 336 of 397
Page 19 of 76 CITY HALL – KEY SPACE DEFICIENCIES City Hall Area (Main Level): • Public Parking: • Larger than desired distance from accessible parking stalls and parking lot in general • Undersized to accommodate high volume days at the facility • Shared with city vehicles • Lobby/Reception: • This space cannot be locked off after hours to limit public access (i.e., Lower Level has free access to Main Level) • Council Chambers: • Unique configuration limits how the space can be utilized and seating • Windows in current state presents a potential security concern • Conference Rooms / Meeting Space: • Facility lacks a council conference room directly off Council Chambers • Main conference room is not within staff space requiring access through the lobby. • Facility lacks meeting rooms off the main lobby for staff to meet with the public rather than bringing them back into staff space. • Facility lacks additional conferencing/teaming space within the limits of the staff work area. • Staff Offices / Workstations: • Offices and workstations are generally undersized. • No room for departmental growth and/or seasonal staff • Security: • Council Chambers / Entry / Lobby configuration makes it difficult to monitor both spaces when the Council Chambers is in use • Staff are on display with the large number of windows and location/height of windows. • The facility lacks hardening measures to protect staff working in the building and act as a deterrent (i.e., bollards, bullet resistant glass, etc.) • Elections: • Election equipment storage puts pressure on departmental storage needs • Configuration of the lobby and available space off the lobby puts pressure on the facility during elections • Storage / Workroom: • Adequate storage is lacking throughout the facility • Workroom space has been encroached upon by storage needs • Wellness & Mental Health: • Breakroom is not contiguous with staff workspace • Mother's room (lactation room) is in a converted storage room and not connected to staff space • There are not dedicated staff toilet facilities within the facility Page 337 of 397
Page 20 of 76 Police Department Area (Lower Level): •Entry Vestibule:
•Wayfinding / easily found an issue due to split entries of facility
•Lacks access to a Victim / Family Conference directly off vestibule
•Lobby/Reception:
•Public is often accessing the police lobby from the Main Level. Wayfinding is
unclear even with an adjacent parking lot.
•Visitors are not contained with a dedicated space – Main Level can be accessed
after hours once in the Lobby is not compact and does not contain
•Records / Workroom:
•Undersized and due to pressure from the lack of other storage needs within the
building dedicated space is required that is sized appropriately
•Security:
•Staff are on display with the large number of windows and location/height
of windows.
•The facility lacks hardening measures to protect staff working in the building and
act as a deterrent (i.e., bollards, bullet resistant glass, etc.)
•Offices and Workstations:
•Undersized and in most cases additional storage is occurring within the office
space
•Current space is not adequate for patrol officers – utilize the breakroom
•No room for department growth
•Flex Office Space:
•The facility lacks additional offices/workstations to accommodate other
departments that may be working with Mendota Heights Police (i.e., State Patrol,
Dakota County, etc.)
•Space can be utilized for remote court dates that officers need to be a part of
•Conference / Meeting Rooms:
•Facility lacks sufficient conference / meeting room space of varying sizes
•The Roll Call room is currently shared with the breakroom, storage and remote
court space needs.
•The facility lacks a room that can be utilized for all-departmental training
•Storage:
•The facility lacks both space and dedicated spaces for required storage (i.e., files,
equipment, etc.)
•Insufficient space for equipment, gear and medical bag storage (currently shared
with the breakroom/roll call room)
•Interview Rooms:
•Interview rooms are not in the right locations to make them effective in
addressing witness and in-custody person's confidentiality and safety
•Makeshift interview room in Lobby is not private or soundproof (constructed of
furniture partitions that don't have full height walls.
Page 338 of 397
Page 21 of 76 • Interview rooms within the department are not ideal • One (1) of the two (2) interview rooms is currently being utilized for an office • Requires that an in-custody individual is lead through the department to access – or - Not within the secure perimeter of in-custody holding area • Evidence: • Evidence storage is undersized • Area lacks dedicated evidence processing space (currently within Evidence Storage room) • Evidence intake is undersized • Large evidence storage is undersized – not enough space for storage of larger items (i.e., bicycles, etc.) and a vehicle in the event a • Armory • Undersized for needs of both firearm and ammunition storage • Dedicated and larger firearm cleaning area needed • Locker rooms: • Both rooms are lacking in both ADA clearances and general space to move around • Limited shower and changing space (only accommodates one (1) individual at a time) • Decontamination: • The facility lacks space dedicated to accommodate an officer returning who needs to change out of uniform due to exposure of No laundry room • Wellness & Mental Health • Fitness room is undersized for its shared use. It is also disconnected from the department – staff need to walk across the lobby to access • Facility lacks space for defensive tactics and fitness training (i.e., clear floor space w/ padding on floor and walls) • Facility lacks a "cool down" room for officers to decompress after returning from a call • Parking / Vehicle Storage: • Existing facility can only accommodate two (2) vehicles • Remaining vehicles are parked outside of the facility • City Hall is short +/- 5,600 SF in space Existing space is +/- 11,400 SF (66% of need) Total need for departments and council is 17,050 SF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Police Department is short +/-27,975 SF in space Existing space is +/- 8,500 SF (30% of need) Total need for the department is 36,475 SF (includes enclosed secure parking) Page 339 of 397
Page 22 of 76 City Council directed staff at the September 3rd work session to identify a Needs vs. Wants
list to determine actual square footage of each department, and further, to help reduce
project costs. The following highlighted in red was removed from the program to identify
"Immediate Needs". All space needs, including the red designations, are identified as “Dig
Once”.
Page 340 of 397
Page 23 of 76 Page 341 of 397
Page 24 of 76 Page 342 of 397
Page 25 of 76 Page 343 of 397
Page 26 of 76 Page 344 of 397
Page 27 of 76 Page 345 of 397
Page 28 of 76 SPACE UTILIZATION: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT OPEN HOUSE TAKEAWAYS: FACILITY NEEDS AND CONDITIONS Police Department: Overwhelming resident consensus that the current police facilities are inadequate — lacking space, privacy, security (e.g., bulletproof windows), and proper interview rooms for victims. City Hall: Mixed feedback — some say it's sufficient, others cite outdated bathrooms, lack of storage, and need for community meeting spaces. General Building Issues: Cramped spaces, poor ventilation, outdated infrastructure, and safety concerns were frequently mentioned. Common Phrases & Keywords Received from Open House Feedback Cards: “Outdated,” “cramped,” “inadequate” – frequently used to describe current facilities. “Privacy,” “security,” “bulletproof,” “locker rooms” – common in police-related feedback. “Tax,” “cost,” “$30 million,” “affordability” – often mentioned in cost-related concerns. “Community center,” “meeting space,” “kid-friendly” – appeared in requests for public use areas. Common Themes Identified from the Community: 1. Strong Support for Improvements • Many attendees agreed that the current facilities are outdated, cramped, and inadequate for both current and future needs. • There was broad support for improving police department facilities, especially around: • Privacy for victims • Security (e.g., bulletproof glass) • Locker rooms, interview rooms, and break areas 2. Concerns About Cost Several respondents expressed concern about the estimated $30–35 million cost, urging the city to: • Explore renovation vs. new construction (We have done this already and will review the benefits and new construction) • Minimize tax impact • Consider phased or modest upgrades 3. Community Space Requests Multiple cards requested community meeting spaces, especially: • Indoor, kid-friendly areas for winter • Club or group meeting rooms • A community center similar to neighboring cities Page 346 of 397
Page 29 of 76 4. Suggestions for Alternative ApproachesIdeas included:
•Separating the police department to another site (e.g., near the water tower)
•Leasing space to private businesses (e.g., Starbucks or a bank) to offset costs
•Using vacant buildings or adding on to existing structures5. Appreciation for the EventMany attendees praised the open house format, police department tours, and staffpresentations.Some asked for more detailed plans, cost breakdowns, and follow-up engagement.Overall Statistics from the Open House: Total feedback cards analyzed: 60+ Cards with written feedback: ~55 Cards with email addresses provided: ~40 Cards requesting follow-up: ~10 (explicitly) Theme Mentions % of Total Cards ✅Support for Improvements42 ~70%
Page 30 of 76 Page 348 of 397
Page 31 of 76 PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE: Page 349 of 397
Page 32 of 76 The “Three-Legged Stool” Approach: The “three-legged stool” approach to city council de cision-making requires every decision to be
made based on a balance of need, financial, and political merit throughout all phases of the
process. To date, the city has successfully considered and balanced all of these elements: 1.NEED•Considered facility solutions that directly aligned spaces to efficiently
provide essential services to the community.
•Helped shape the preliminary design to be flexible, equitable, and provide safe
working environments.
•Incorporated input from city hall staff and police staff.2.POLITICAL•Fostering community trust through transparent, ongoing communication.
•Engaging stakeholders early and often – and listening to public sentiment.
•Building a strong, urgent case for facility needs.
•Addressing opposition with empathy and facts.3.FINANCIAL•Providing fiscally responsible, data-driven solutions with clear ROI.
•Developing financial solutions that are sensitive to city taxpayers.
END OF REPORT
Page 350 of 397
Page 33 of 76 Appendix A ThoughtExchange / City Council Engagement Results Page 351 of 397
Page 34 of 76 ThoughtExchange Staff Engagement (Surveys and Department Meetings) July 21, 2025 Summary: The survey results indicate significant dissatisfact ion with the current Municipal Campus
facilities, with 93% of respondents stating that the space does not meet their department's
needs. A majority of participants (83%) feel that the facility lacks adequate security and safety
features for both staff and the public. Additionally, 79% believe that constructing a new facility
would best address these challenges. The sentiment reflects a strong need for improved
infrastructure, safety, and space allocation to accommodate current and future staffing needs, as
34% anticipate growth in their departments. The qualitative responses further emphasize the
need for better office space, security enhancements, and functional public interaction areas. Categories Facility Adequacy: The current Municipal Campus is largely perceived as inadequate, with 93%
of respondents indicating that the space does not meet their department's needs. Participants
highlighted issues such as insufficient office space, lack of dedicated workstations, and
inadequate layout for emergency situations. The perception is that the facility is outdated and
unable to support the operational requirements of the departments effectively. Security and Safety: There is a strong consensus (83%) that the Municipal Campus lacks
adequate security and safety features for staff and public protection. Participants expressed
concerns about the building's ability to safeguard against emergencies and the need for
improved security measures. The sentiment is that significant upgrades are necessary to ensure
a safe working environment. Future Growth and Space Needs: With 34% of respondents anticipating departmental gr owth,
there is a clear need for additional space and resources. Participants are concerned about the
facility's capacity to accommodate future staffing increases and the potential for overcrowding.
The perception is that proactive planning and expansion are required to meet future demands. Public Interaction and Functionality: While 53% of respondents have frequent public interactions, there are concerns about the functionality and accessibility of public areas within
the campus. Participants noted that current facilities do not adequately support public
engagement and suggested improvements in layout and design to enhance public service
delivery.
Page 352 of 397
Page 35 of 76 Preferred Solutions: A significant majority (79%) of participants believe that constructing a new facility is the best approach to address the current challenges. This reflects a general sentiment that minor updates or remodels would not suffice to meet the comprehensive needs identified. Areas to investigate: Facility Adequacy: With 93% of respondents indicating inadequacy, further investigation is needed to identify specific spatial and functional deficiencies. Security and Safety: Given the 83% dissatisfaction rate, a detailed assessment of current security measures and potential improvements is necessary. Future Growth and Space Needs: As 34% anticipate growth, exploring options for expansion or reallocation of space to accommodate future staffing is crucial. Detailed Responses: Q1: What department do you represent? Answered: 31 | Not answered: 4 Item, #, %: • Administration/ Licensing, Elections, Communications, HR, IT, Admin Services), 9, █████ 29% • Finance/ AR/AP, Utility, Billing, Budget, Admin Support Services, 2, █ 6% • Engineering/Public Works/ Facilities, Community Development, Public Works, Parks & Rec, Natural Resources, 9, █████ 29% • Police, 11, ███████ 35% Q2: Are all of the staff in your department working or officing within the Municipal Campus? Answered: 31 | Not answered: 4 Item, #, %: • Yes: All working on site full-time, 22, ██████████████ 71% • Partially: Working part-time in the Municipal Building; and part-time in another city -owned facility, 6, ███ 19% • Partially: Working part-time in the Municipal Building and the position requires off-site field work, 3, ██ 10% • No: Working remotely a majority of the time, 0, | 0% Page 353 of 397
Page 36 of 76 Q3: How often do you work onsite at the Municipal Campus? No responses for this question. Q4: Please list any facility-related issues that may impact how often you work in-person at the Municipal Campus. NOTE: this question can be skipped if not applicable to you. Answered: 26 | Not answered: 9 Summary: Responses indicate several facility-related issues i mpacting in-person work at the
Municipal Campus. Predominant concerns include inadequate space for staff, storage, and
meetings, leading to cramped work conditions and difficulty in collaboration. Safety issues
are noted, such as poor visibility and security concerns, alongside structural problems like
mold and leaking fixtures. Limited parking and egress issues for emergency vehicles are
highlighted. The building's dated condition and lack of appropriate amenities, such as
dedicated rooms for virtual meetings and mothers, further exacerbate the situation.
Cleanliness and functionality issues, including pest presence and duct-taped carpets, are
also mentioned. Q5: Does the current space and location within the Municipal Campus meet your department's needs? Answered: 30 | Not answered: 5 Item, #, %: •Yes, 2, █ 7%•No, 28, ██████████████████ 93%Q6: If no, please explain how your office space needs could be better met and/or your desired location. Answered: 28 | Not answered: 7 Summary: The responses highlight a significant need for expan ded office space, storage, and
specialized facilities. Many departments face overcrowding, inadequate storage, and
insufficient meeting areas, impacting productivity and privacy. Specific requests include
larger cubicles, dedicated spaces for elections, training, and evidence processing, and
improved parking and garage facilities. Privacy concerns are prevalent, with calls for
frosted glass and private interview spaces. Additionally, there are complaints about poor
Page 354 of 397
Page 37 of 76 maintenance, temperature control, and lack of natural light. Overall, the need for more square footage, better layout, and enhanced amenities is evident to support efficient and effective operations. Q7: Does your department/position require a dedicated office or workstation? Answered: 30 | Not answered: 5 Item, #, %: • Yes, 27, ██████████████████ 90% • No, 3, ██ 10% Q8: Would your department/position take advantage of a non-dedicated workstation (i.e., hoteling/hot-desking, etc.) Answered: 30 | Not answered: 5 Item, #, %: • Yes, 7, ████ 23% • No, 23, ███████████████ 77% • Q9: If yes, list your department and/or position. Answered: 5 | Not answered: 30 Summary: The responses indicate a variety of departments and positions: Police Officer, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation, Law Enforcement Records, and Officers Hotel. Each respondent has identified their specific role or department in relation to the question asked. Q10: How would you describe your interaction with the public when working at the Municipal Campus? Answered: 30 | Not answered: 5 Item, #, %: • Frequent, direct contact with the public, 16, ██████████ 53% • Occasional public interaction, 11, ███████ 37% • Primarily internal/administrative work, 2, █ 7% • No public interaction, 1, | 3% Page 355 of 397
Page 38 of 76 Q11: When interacting with the public at the Municipal Campus, what works well and what doesn’t, when it comes to building needs and/or functionality? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The responses highlight several challenges in interacting with the public at the Municipal Campus. Key issues include inadequate privacy for confidential conversations, insufficient meeting spaces, and security concerns such as non-bulletproof glass and ineffective panic buttons. The lobby and reception areas are poorly designed, leading to noise and congestion, which complicates communication. Additionally, the lack of dedicated spaces for community programs and elections further hampers functionality. Overall, the facility struggles with providing secure, private, and efficient spaces for public interaction, impacting both staff and visitor experiences. Q12: What does your staffing look like in 5-10 years into the future as it relates to department size? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Item, #, %: • Anticipate growth in the number of employees ( 5 or more employees -or will need additional space) , 10, ██████ 34% • Anticipate some growth in number of employees (less than 5 and/or current space can accommodate), 7, ████ 24% • Anticipate a decrease in number of employees , 0, | 0% • Anticipate steady size (no change), 12, ████████ 41% Q13: Do you feel that the current facility has an adequate building layout for both INDOORS and/or OUTDOORS to protect staff in the event of an emergency? Answered: 30 | Not answered: 5 Item, #, %: • Yes, 5, ███ 17% • No, 25, ████████████████ 83% Page 356 of 397
Page 39 of 76 Q14: Do you feel that the Municipal Campus has adequate built-in security or safety features to protect STAFF in the performance of daily tasks associated with their job? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Item, #, %: • Yes, 5, ███ 17% • No-in need of improvement, 24, ████████████████ 83% Q15: Do you feel that the Municipal Campus has adequate built-in security features to protect the PUBLIC when visiting the building? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Item, #, %: • Yes, 8, █████ 28% • No-in need of improvement, 21, ██████████████ 72% Q16: What other building-related security improvements would you recommend? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The responses highlight several critical security improvements needed for the building. Key recommendations include upgrading panic buttons, enhancing parking security with gated access, and ensuring multiple exits for police vehicles. The facility requires bulletproof glass, commercial-grade doors, and a modern camera system. Separate and secure spaces for staff, such as break rooms and bathrooms, are essential. Improved emergency preparedness measures, including tornado shelters and active shooter notification systems, are necessary. Additionally, outdated locks and tripping hazards in the parking lot need addressing, alongside better accessibility and privacy for sensitive discussions. Q17: What other space needs would you recommend? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The responses highlight a need for expanded and improved facilities, including more meeting rooms, larger locker rooms, gyms, kitchens, and dedicated spaces for various functions such as training, evidence packing, and elections. Enhanced storage solutions, larger offices, and conference rooms are requested, along with better parking arrangements and natural lighting. There is a call for updated restrooms, wellness rooms, Page 357 of 397
Page 40 of 76 and community spaces for engagement and programming. Specific needs for the police
department include separate facilities, more workstations, interview rooms, and training
areas. Overall, the emphasis is on creating intentional, spacious, and modern environments
to accommodate staff and operational needs. Q18: A recent community survey determined that there should be public community space(s) available within the municipal building. As a city employee, share how you think this should be done to avoid any staff disruption. Any suggestions on location and/or type of space? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The responses suggest creating public community spac es within the municipal building
while minimizing staff disruption. Recommendations include separate, dedicated rooms or
areas, possibly on different floors or ends of the building, to avoid interference with staff
activities. Suggestions emphasize secure access, such as FAB doors, and online reservation
systems. Some propose off-site locations or building expansions due to current space
limitations. The need for additional parking and staffing for evening events is noted.
Overall, the focus is on ensuring public spaces are distinct from staff areas to maintain
operational efficiency. Q19: What elements regarding facility functionality work well at the Municipal Campus? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The Municipal Campus benefits from having all staff and departments in close proximity,
facilitating communication, collaboration, and document review. The front desk's strategic
location enhances visitor experience, while the building's natural light and open views are
appreciated. However, concerns about space limitations, safety, and outdated facilities
persist. The presence of City Hall and police in the same area is advantageous for safety
and partnership. Despite these positives, the facility is generally seen as inadequate, with
suggestions for new construction to address its shortcomings.
Page 358 of 397
Page 41 of 76 Q20: What elements (aesthetics, safety & security, office needs and space needs) need improvement at the Municipal Campus? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary: The Municipal Campus requires significant improvements across various elements. Security enhancements are needed, including secure doors and safe spaces for staff. Space needs are critical, with calls for additional offices, storage, and designated areas like interview rooms and a mother's room. Aesthetic updates are necessary, as the interior is outdated and uninviting. Safety concerns include inadequate construction standards and mold issues. Office needs involve better furniture, ergonomic designs, and improved cleanliness. The facility lacks sufficient bathrooms, especially for women, and requires better pedestrian pathways and parking access. Overall, the building is outdated, affecting morale and functionality. Q21: Which of the following general approaches do you believe would best address the current challenges at Municipal Campus? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Item, #, % • Significant remodel of the existing building, 4, ██ 14% • Constructing a new facility, 23, ███████████████ 79% • Minimal updates/maintain existing layout, 0, | 0% • Not sure, 2, █ 7% Q22: Any final comments you feel City Leadership should be aware of as it pertains to the building’s current state and/or future? Answered: 29 | Not answered: 6 Summary The responses highlight significant concerns about the current building's disrepair, inadequate space, and its impact on staff recruitment and retention. Many suggest constructing a new building to address these issues, emphasizing the need for improved working conditions, safety, and sustainability. The police department's space constraints are a recurring theme, with calls for a separate facility. Respondents appreciate being included in the decision-making process and urge city leadership to plan for future growth. There is a consensus that a new building would be more cost-effective and beneficial than renovating the existing structure. Page 359 of 397
Page 42 of 76 City of Mendota Heights City Council Engagement Results Conducted May 2025 Introduction: This report presents the results of the Mendota Heights City Council engagement effort, which used a combined ThoughtExchange exchange and survey methodology to gather meaningful insights from key stakeholders across the organization. Staff were invited to participate in an open-ended exchange—sharing their thoughts and rating the thoughts of others on a 5 star scale—alongside targeted survey questions designed to deepen understanding of user experience, workplace needs, and organizational priorities. By integrating these two approaches, the ThoughtExchange platform provided a comprehensive and transparent way to surface collective perspectives, highlight areas of alignment, and identify opportunities for improvement. The findings outlined in this report summarize participation patterns, top-rated thoughts, emerging themes, and user-experience insights that can support decision-making and guide next steps for the City of Mendota Heights. Survey Summary: The feedback from the participants indicates a strong consensus on the need for improvements in the Municipal Campus, particularly concerning security and space requirements. A significant 80% of respondents feel that the current facility lacks adequate security measures for both staff and the public. Additionally, 60% of participants are unsure about the best approach to address these challenges, though 40% suggest constructing a new joint facility for city offices and the Police Department. There is unanimous support (100%) among elected officials for a modest tax increase to fund these improvements, provided there is a well-defined and communicated plan. Qualitative responses highlight the need for better security features, additional space for police and staff, and improved community spaces. Categories: Security and Safety: Participants overwhelmingly perceive the current security measures as inadequate, with 80% indicating a need for improvement. Concerns include the lack of secondary egress in the Council Chambers and the vulnerability of windows. There is a call for enhanced security features, particularly for the police department and public areas, to ensure safety in emergencies. Page 360 of 397
Page 43 of 76 Space and Facilities: The need for additional space is a recurring theme, especially for the police department, which requires more room for staff, storage, and secure areas. Participants also mention the need for community meeting spaces and improved staff workspaces. The perception is that the current facilities are insufficient for both current and future needs. Community Support and Funding: There is a strong belief (80%) that the community would support facility improvements if a clear and responsible plan is communicated. Elected officials unanimously support a modest tax increase to fund these improvements, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in the planning process. Aesthetics and Functionality: While some participants appreciate the residential aesthetic and welcoming atmosphere of the current building, there is a desire for functional improvements. Suggestions include better lighting, ADA-compliant features, and multi-use spaces that can adapt to various community needs. Future Planning and Development: Participants stress the importance of planning for future needs, with a focus on building a facility that can adapt to changing requirements over the next 50 years. There is a call for a strategic balance between immediate needs and long-term goals. Areas to Investigate: • Security Measures: With 80% of participants indicating inadequate security, further investigation is needed to identify specific vulnerabilities and potential solutions. • Space Requirements: The need for additional space, particularly for the police department, requires a detailed assessment to determine the most effective way to meet these needs. • Community Engagement: Understanding the community's priorities and willingness to support improvements through a tax increase is crucial for successful planning and implementation. Detailed Survey Responses Q1: Does the current Council Chambers and its location within the Municipal Campus adequately serve the needs of both the Council and the community? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes 2 ████████ 40% No 3 ████████████ 60% Page 361 of 397
Page 44 of 76 Q2: If no, please explain how space needs could be better met and/or your desired location. Answered: 3 | Not answered: 4 Comments: •Council Chambers has some significant security issues in its current configuration.
Location within the campus and building are good, but there is no secondary egress
that can be utilized with ease. Additionally, the big window behind the dais is
concerning for security and safety purposes.
•The police needs additional space to work, meet, store files, better lockers and
changing facilities, and train. They also need safer space. Staff also needs additional
room for their desks, meeting rooms for them and which the community could use or
rent, filing space and a place for council work sessions that could be televised.
•The location is ideal. Resident and council experience is warm and welcoming (I have
been both), I like the ground level entrance, lovely garden, ease of parking, the way
you enter and directly to the right is the chambers and to the left is a staff member
who can help you (with a permit, to vote, etc). The open space between the chamber
and welcome desk is a perfect sized reception area (or overflow area) with a view of
the woods (the deck is not used), with an area for comfy chairs. The conference room
is conveniently located, a nice size and it's easy to navigate to council chambers, with
nice windows. The round, warm wood, windows, light, capacity, ceiling and acoustics
make chambers feel warm and welcoming (as opposed to WSP). The chairs/tables are
easy to set up after a work session, From the dais, I can easily see the public and staff. I
like the capacity of the room. I really like the space.Q3: Do you feel that the current facility has adequate physical measures in place (INDOORS and/or OUTDOORS) to protect staff in the event of an emergency? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes 1 ████ 20% No 4 ████████████████ 80% Page 362 of 397
Page 45 of 76 Q4: Do you feel that the Municipal Campus has adequate built-in security or safety features to protect STAFF in the performance of daily tasks associated with their job? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes 1 ████ 20% No-in need of improvement 4 ████████████████ 80% Q5: Do you feel that the Municipal Campus has adequate built-in security features to protect the PUBLIC when visiting the building? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes 1 ████ 20% No-in need of improvement 4 ████████████████ 80% Q6: What other building-related security improvements would you recommend? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: Several respondents emphasized the importance of consulting public safety experts for building-related security improvements. Suggestions included enhancing security measures for windows, particularly those facing north in the lower level office space, and considering additional exits, entry points, and a driveway. The need for a tornado shelter and an indoor garage for police, staff, and council members was also mentioned. While some believe the building is generally secure, the need to harden windows was highlighted. Balancing accessibility with safety was noted as important, and the staff's role in maintaining a welcoming environment was praised. Page 363 of 397
Page 46 of 76 Common Ground & Differences: Side A Trust in Public Safety Experts Common Ground Balancing Trust and Security Enhancements Side B Physical Security Enhancements Some respondents emphasize the importance of deferring to public safety experts for building-related security improvements. They trust these professionals to make informed decisions about necessary measures, suggesting that any recommendations should come from them. This perspective values the expertise and experience of public safety workers, believing that they are best equipped to assess and address security needs. A common ground between the differing perspectives is the idea of balancing accessibility with safety. While some emphasize the need for expert guidance and others suggest specific physical improvements, both sides recognize the importance of maintaining a welcoming environment. Ensuring that security measures do not impede accessibility or create an unwelcoming atmosphere is a shared concern, highlighting the need for thoughtful integration of safety features. Others focus on specific physical security enhancements, such as improving the security of windows, adding additional exits and entry points, and considering the inclusion of a tornado shelter and indoor garage. These suggestions aim to address perceived vulnerabilities in the building's current security setup, particularly in areas like the lower level and office spaces. This approach prioritizes tangible changes to the building's infrastructure to enhance safety. Categories: • Physical Security: Physical security improvements were a major focus among the responses. Participants highlighted the need for enhanced security measures for windows, particularly those facing north, to prevent unauthorized access. The suggestion to harden windows indicates a concern for potential vulnerabilities in the building's structure. Additionally, the idea of adding more exits and entry points was mentioned, which could improve both security and accessibility. Overall, there is a perception that while the building is generally secure, specific areas like windows require further attention. • Access and Egress: Access and egress were discussed in terms of improving the building's functionality and safety. The addition of more exits and entry points was suggested to facilitate better movement and emergency evacuation. This category also includes the consideration of an indoor garage for police, staff, and council members, Page 364 of 397
Page 47 of 76 which would enhance both security and convenience. Participants seem to value the balance between accessibility and security, indicating a desire for improvements that do not compromise the building's welcoming nature. The perception is that these changes could enhance the overall safety and efficiency of the building. • Emergency Preparedness: Emergency preparedness was mentioned in the context of having a designated tornado shelter area. This reflects a concern for natural disaster readiness and the safety of building occupants during such events. The suggestion indicates an awareness of the need for comprehensive safety measures that go beyond typical security concerns. Participants seem to recognize the importance of being prepared for a variety of emergency situations. The perception is that having a dedicated shelter area would be a valuable addition to the building's safety features. • Trust in Public Safety: Trust in public safety experts was emphasized by some participants, who deferred to these professionals for recommendations on security improvements. This indicates a high level of confidence in the expertise and judgment of public safety workers. The mention of balancing accessibility with safety suggests that participants value input from those who are experienced in managing security while maintaining a welcoming environment. The perception is that public safety experts are best equipped to identify and implement effective security measures. This trust underscores the importance of collaboration between building management and security professionals. Comments: • I defer to our public safety experts in this area, and would not recommend anything unless it comes from our public safety workers whom I trust. That said, I believe that accessibility is important and can be balanced with safety. I believe that if someone wants to do harm, they can. Our staff does an amazing job at welcoming people and diffusing anger in chambers. • If the current facility is to be utilized, security measures in the lower level need to be improved, particularly the windows that face to the north. in the office space. • Additional exits and entry points plus an additional driveway. Is there a tornado shelter area? It would be great to have an indoor garage for police, staff, and council members. • Already answered this question. • Building is pretty well secured in my opinion with the exception of the windows. They should likely be hardened. Page 365 of 397
Page 48 of 76 Q7: What other space needs should be considered in the consideration of improvements and/or Municipal Campus facilities? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: Considerations for Municipal Campus improvements inc lude the need for expanded and
adequately equipped spaces for the MHPD, such as larger staff accommodations, separate
break and meeting rooms, and secure, private areas for public interviews. Enhancements in
lighting, heating, ADA-compliant door systems, and restroom accessibility are also
necessary. The police department requires improved locker room facilities, evidence and
secured areas, officer space, squad rooms, interview rooms, and a kitchenette with a break
area. Common Ground & Differences: Side A Community Space Common Ground Balancing Community and Police Needs Side B Police Facilities There is a call for indoor
community space that can
serve as a safe and secure
environment for public
interactions. This includes
areas where the public can
make statements or be
interviewed in privacy. The
emphasis is on creating a
welcoming environment
that meets accessibility
standards, such as ADA-
compliant doors and
improved lighting and
heating systems.
Both community space and
police facilities share a
common need for
improved accessibility
features. This includes
ADA-compliant doors and
optical waving ability for
restroom doors, ensuring
that all individuals,
regardless of physical
ability, can access and
utilize the spaces
effectively. Enhanced
lighting and heating
systems are also a shared
priority to create
comfortable and functional
environments.
The police department's
needs are highlighted as
critical, with a focus on
expanding and improving
existing facilities. This
includes larger staff
accommodations, adequate
locker rooms, evidence and
secured areas, officer space,
squad rooms, interview
rooms, and kitchenette and
break areas. The current
facilities are described as
inadequate and
embarrassing, necessitating
urgent upgrades.
Page 366 of 397
Page 49 of 76 Categories: • Police Facilities: The need for improved police facilities is a prominent concern among participants. There is a strong emphasis on the inadequacy of current locker room facilities, which are described as an embarrassment. Participants also highlight the need for better evidence and secured areas, as well as additional officer space and squad rooms. The necessity for interview rooms, a kitchenette, and a break area is also mentioned, indicating a comprehensive need for updated and expanded facilities. Overall, the perception is that current police facilities are insufficient and require significant improvements to meet the needs of the staff and the public. • Community Spaces: There is a call for more indoor community spaces, reflecting a desire for areas that can serve multiple public functions. Participants express the need for spaces where the public can feel safe, secure, and private when making statements or being interviewed. This suggests a demand for environments that are welcoming and accommodating to community interactions. The perception is that current community spaces may not fully meet these needs, and improvements could enhance public engagement and satisfaction. Overall, the emphasis is on creating spaces that are both functional and inviting for community use. • Accessibility Features: Accessibility features are highlighted as an important consideration for municipal campus improvements. Participants specifically mention the need for ADA-compliant door opening abilities and optical waving abilities for restroom doors. This indicates a focus on ensuring that facilities are accessible to all individuals, including those with disabilities. The perception is that current accessibility features may be lacking, and enhancements could significantly improve the usability of the facilities for everyone. Overall, there is a clear call for upgrades that prioritize inclusivity and ease of access. Comments: • I know there is talk of indoor community space (SEE NEXT COMMENT). The space needs in the MHPD are well documented and don't need repeating. • MHPD needs to have adequate space for a larger staff then existed when the building was originally constructed. There also needs to be separate break & muster/meeting room space in MHPD. Public needs a space to come and make statements/be interviewed where they feel safe, secure, and private. • Better lighting, and heating systems. Want ADA door opening ability and optical waving ability on doors to open and close restroom doors. • Already answered this question Page 367 of 397
Page 50 of 76 • Police needs are critical. There existing Locker room facilities are not adequate and an embarrassment. The evidence and secured areas are not adequate. Officer space, squad room are needed as is interview rooms. Kitchenette and break area are needed as we Q8: A recent community survey identified a desire for more public community space(s) to be available within the Municipal Campus. Any suggestions on location or space type? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: Respondents suggested considering both indoor and outdoor community spaces, with potential partnerships for staffing outside business hours. Existing facilities like the firehouse could be utilized, and the ball field's use should be reassessed. Ideas included a teen gathering space near Aspen House and multi-use spaces for meetings, non-profits, and recreation. There was skepticism about the need for 10,000 to 20,000 square feet, with a preference for flexible, multi-use spaces over dedicated ones. Expansion capability for future needs was also recommended. Page 368 of 397
Page 51 of 76 Common Ground & Differences: Side A Indoor Community Space Common Ground Indoor vs Outdoor Community Spaces Side B Outdoor Recreational Space Some respondents advocate for indoor community spaces, suggesting partnerships with local entities like Dakota County to manage staffing outside business hours. They propose utilizing existing facilities, such as the firehouse, which was designed with community gatherings in mind. The idea is to create versatile indoor spaces that can accommodate various community needs, including meeting spaces for residents and non-profit organizations. A common ground between the differing opinions is the concept of multi-use spaces. Respondents agree that whether indoor or outdoor, spaces should be versatile and adaptable to various community needs. This approach allows for efficient use of space and resources, accommodating a wide range of activities and groups without dedicating areas to specific purposes. Others emphasize the importance of outdoor recreational spaces, suggesting the ball field and other outdoor areas for diverse recreational uses. They propose creating spaces that cater to different demographics, such as a teen gathering area near Aspen House. The focus is on utilizing outdoor areas to meet current needs while allowing for future expansion and adaptability. Categories: • Multi-use Space: The concept of multi-use space is frequently mentioned as a desirable option for the Municipal Campus. Participants suggest that such spaces could accommodate a variety of activities, from community gatherings to recreational events. The flexibility of multi-use spaces is seen as a way to efficiently utilize resources without dedicating areas to single purposes. There is a perception that multi-use spaces could address diverse community needs, making them a practical choice. However, some participants express the need for further discussion to refine the idea and ensure it meets the community's expectations. • Indoor Community Space: Indoor community spaces are highlighted as a potential addition to the Municipal Campus. Some participants suggest partnerships, such as with Dakota County, to manage these spaces effectively. The need for staffing and maintenance outside business hours is a concern, indicating that operational logistics are a significant consideration. The perception is that indoor spaces could serve as Page 369 of 397
Page 52 of 76 venues for meetings and gatherings, enhancing community interaction. However, there
is also a suggestion to explore existing facilities that might already serve this purpose.
•Outdoor Recreational Space: Outdoor recreational spaces are proposed as a way toe
nhance the Municipal Campus. Suggestions include repurposing existing areas like
the ball field for broader recreational use. The idea of creating spaces for specific
groups, such as teens, is also mentioned, indicating a desire to cater to different
demographics. Participants seem open to exploring various recreational options,
reflecting a flexible approach to outdoor space utilization. The perception is that
outdoor spaces could provide valuable community benefits, promoting health and
social interaction.Comments: •I know there is talk of indoor community space, and I think that should be a bid
alternate, or a partnership (with Dakota County?), as community spaces outside of
business hours require staffing. We can also look to existing facilities, like the
firehouse (I believe that was built with community gathering in mind). Externally, we
can look at the ball field (is this the best place for a field?) and consider other
recreational uses for the outdoor area - I have an open mind as to the best use. With
Aspen House in the neighborhood, maybe a teen gathering (hammock) space?
•We should build what we need for today's needs, with expansion capability for future
features on the campus.
•Meeting space for residents, for non-profit, environmental planning or recreation
space
•Already answered this question
•I am not sure I agree that 10,000 or a 20,000 square feet is needed. My review of
survey was all over the board from indoor community center to a gathering space for
seniors. Multi use gathering space may make some sense but I don’t support lots of
“dedicated” space for individual purposes. Multi-use space makes sense if we are
going to do it but this likely needs to be flushed out more.
Page 370 of 397
Page 53 of 76 Q9: What elements (i.e., aesthetics, safety & security, staff workspace, etc.) regarding facility functionality work well at the Municipal Campus? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: The Municipal Campus is praised for its functional front desk, staff offices, and cubicles, which contribute to a welcoming environment. The ground-level entrance, garden, and ease of parking enhance accessibility, while the chambers and reception area offer a warm, inviting atmosphere with views of the woods. The conference room is conveniently located and easy to navigate. The residential aesthetic of City Hall is appreciated, and the building's design incorporates art at minimal cost. Suggestions include optimizing workspace configurations and ensuring the building remains inviting while incorporating passive security measures. Common Ground & Differences: Side A Welcoming Aesthetics Common Ground Balancing Aesthetics and Security Side B Security Concerns The Municipal Campus is praised for its warm and welcoming aesthetics, which include a residential look and feel that makes it inviting and friendly. The design elements such as the open space, warm wood, and natural light contribute to a pleasant atmosphere. The ease of navigation and the strategic placement of facilities like the chambers and reception area enhance the visitor experience, making the campus feel accessible and community-oriented. Both sides agree on the importance of functional workspace design. There is a consensus that workspaces should be right-sized to optimize efficiency and reduce clutter. Reconfiguring and potentially downsizing some areas could improve the overall functionality of the campus. This common ground highlights the need for a balance between aesthetic appeal and practical workspace solutions. While the welcoming aesthetics are appreciated, there are concerns about the balance between openness and security. Some believe that the building should not feel like a 'locked down fortress,' but there is an acknowledgment that passive security measures are necessary. The challenge lies in maintaining an inviting environment while ensuring the safety and security of both staff and visitors. Page 371 of 397
Page 54 of 76 Categories • Aesthetics: The aesthetics of the Municipal Campus are highly appreciated by participants, with a strong emphasis on the residential look and feel of the City Hall. This design choice is perceived as inviting and friendly, making the space more welcoming to both residents and staff. The presence of artwork, both inside and outside the buildings, is noted as a positive feature, contributing to the overall aesthetic appeal. Participants also appreciate the warm and welcoming atmosphere created by elements such as warm wood, windows, and natural light. Overall, the aesthetics are seen as a key factor in making the Municipal Campus an inviting and pleasant environment. • Functionality: The functionality of the Municipal Campus is generally well-regarded, with specific praise for the layout and ease of navigation. The ground-level entrance, ease of parking, and the strategic placement of key areas like the chambers and staff offices contribute to a seamless experience for visitors and staff alike. The conference room and council chambers are noted for their convenient location and appropriate size, enhancing the usability of the space. Participants appreciate the capacity and setup flexibility of the chambers, which facilitate effective meetings and public interactions. Overall, the functionality of the campus supports its role as a hub for municipal activities. • Workspace: The workspace at the Municipal Campus receives mixed feedback, with some participants noting that the current configuration is effective, while others suggest potential improvements. There is a perception that some workspaces, such as cubicles and offices, may be larger than necessary, indicating a need for reconfiguration to optimize space usage. Despite these concerns, there is a general consensus that there is enough workspace for city hall staff if adjustments are made. The importance of having a well-organized and clutter-free environment is also highlighted. Overall, while the workspace is functional, there is room for improvement in terms of space efficiency. • Safety & Security: Safety and security at the Municipal Campus are considered important, with a focus on maintaining a balance between being welcoming and secure. Participants emphasize the need for passive security measures that do not compromise the inviting nature of the campus. The idea is to avoid creating a 'locked down fortress' while ensuring that security needs are adequately addressed. This approach is seen as essential to maintaining a positive public perception and ensuring the safety of both staff and visitors. Overall, the emphasis is on implementing security measures that are effective yet unobtrusive. Page 372 of 397
Page 55 of 76 Comments: • I like the front desk, staff offices and cubicles seem to function well, nice public facilities. Repeat from question 2: Resident and council experience is warm and welcoming. I like the ground level entrance, garden, ease of parking, the way you enter and directly to the right is the chambers and to the left is a staff member who can help you (with a permit, to vote, etc). The open space between the chamber and welcome desk is a perfect sized reception area (or overflow area) with a view of the woods(the deck is not used), with an area for comfy chairs. The conference room is conveniently located, a nice size and it's easy to navigate to council chambers, with nice windows. The round, warm wood, windows ,light, capacity. ceiling and acoustics make chambers feel warm and welcoming (as opposed to WSP). The chairs/tables are easy to set up after a work session from the dais, I can easily see the public and staff. I like the capacity of the room. • Public likes the residential aesthetic of City Hall. There is enough work space for city hall staff (non-MHPD) if work spaces are reconfigured (and potentially downsized). • Indoor garages. Staff and community meeting rooms. Artwork on the outside and inside of buildings at minimal cost-1% of building costs go to artwork which could be building shape or graphics, or separate art. • Already answered this question • Love that the building fits into a ”residential” look and feel. Make it inviting and friendly. Works spaces for city staff should be right sized some cubicles are very large. Offices as well. Perhaps new to look at storage space as well as there seems to be a lot of clutter. The building should be inviting to the community and public not a locked down fortress. Though passive security measures are a must. Q10: What elements (i.e., aesthetics, safety & security, office workspace, other space needs) need improvement at the Municipal Campus? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: The Municipal Campus requires improvements in MHPD facilities and security, particularly in response to current events. Enhancements are needed for MHPD and Council chambers, as well as staff security against external threats, such as window and exterior wall improvements. Staff currently feels isolated from the public due to restricted access, and there is a need for staff involvement in determining space needs. Spaces should be appropriately sized to meet requirements, with a preference against large open areas. Page 373 of 397
Page 56 of 76 Common Ground & Differences: Side A Security Enhancements Common Ground Security vs. Accessibility Balance Side B Public Accessibility There is a strong emphasis
on the need for improved
security measures at the
Municipal Campus.
Concerns are raised about
the safety of staff,
particularly in light of
current events. Specific
suggestions include
enhancing the security of
the MHPD facilities and
Council chambers, as well
as improving the security
of windows and exterior
walls to protect against
external threats.
A common ground
between security
enhancements and public
accessibility is the need for
balanced space design.
This involves creating a
secure environment for
staff while also ensuring
that the public can access
necessary areas without
feeling isolated. By
rightsizing spaces and
involving staff in the
planning process, the
Municipal Campus can
achieve a harmonious
balance between safety
and accessibility.
There is a concern about
the isolation of staff from
the public due to
restricted access to staff
areas. The current setup
requires permission and
unlocking of doors for
public admittance, which
may hinder effective
communication and
interaction. Suggestions
include involving staff in
discussions about space
needs and ensuring that
all spaces are
appropriately sized to
meet functional
requirements. Categories: •Security Improvements: Security improvements are a major concern for partic ipants,
particularly in light of current events. There is a specific emphasis on enhancing
security measures for the MHPD and Council chambers. Participants also express a
need for better protection against external threats, such as improvements to windows
and exterior walls. The perception is that current security measures are inadequate and
need urgent attention. Overall, there is a strong call for comprehensive security
upgrades to ensure the safety of staff and visitors.
•Staff Space Needs: Participants feel that staff areas are currently too isolated from the
public, which may hinder effective communication and interaction. There is a
suggestion that staff should be more involved in determining their space needs and
desires. The current setup, which requires permission to access staff areas, is seen as a
barrier. There is also a call for spaces to be 'rightsized' to better meet the needs of the
Page 374 of 397
Page 57 of 76 staff. The perception is that the current configuration does not adequately support staff requirements or foster a collaborative environment. • Facility Expansion: There is a documented need for improvements and expansion of the MHPD facilities. Participants highlight that the current facilities are insufficient to meet the demands placed upon them. The perception is that without expansion, the facilities will continue to fall short of operational needs. This category underscores the necessity for physical growth to accommodate increasing requirements. The call for expansion is seen as essential for maintaining effective operations. Comments: • MHPD facilities need improvements and expansion, as documented. • Security needs improvements. Especially in the current climate (reflecting on current events). Specifically, MHPD and Council chambers issues previously mentioned and staff security from a threat outside the building (i.e. window and exterior wall improvements. • Already answered this question. • Already answered this question • Staff seems really isolated from the public right now. Admittance to staff area is only granted through permission and opening of locked doors. Staff would be better to be involved in staff space needs/desires. All spaces should be rightsized to meet needs. • Not a fan of big open areas. Page 375 of 397
Page 58 of 76 Q11: Which of the following general approaches do you believe would best address the current challenges at Municipal Campus? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Do nothing 0 | 0% Minimal updates/maintain existing layout 0 | 0% Significant remodel of the existing building 0 | 0% Significant remodel of existing building with a building addition 0 | 0% Construct a new facility for city offices only 0 | 0% Construct a new facility for the Police Department only 0 | 0% Construct a new joint facility for both city offices and the Police Department 2 ████████ 40% Not sure 3 ████████████ 60% Q12: Do you feel the community would support a facility improvement solution that includes a tax increase to improve the facilities on the Municipal Campus? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes- I expect strong public support so long as we layout a well-defined plan that is well communicated, delivers established goals and utilizes funding responsibly. 1 ████ 20% Yes-likely support with a well-defined plan that is communicated well, delivers established goals and utilizes funding responsibly. 4 ████████████████ 80% No - unlikely the public would support any improvements that result in a tax increase. 0 | 0% Unsure. 0 | 0% Other 0 | 0% Page 376 of 397
Page 59 of 76 Q13: As an elected official representing the community’s best interests, would you support a modest tax increase to improve the Municipal Campus facility so that it would benefit the safety, security, and space needs for all city staff and community members? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Item # % Yes 5 ████████████████████ 100% No 0 | 0% Unsure 0 | 0% Q14: Are there any final comments you believe City Council should consider regarding the building’s current condition or future use as we make decisions moving forward? Answered: 5 | Not answered: 2 Summary: Respondents emphasize the importance of involving th e public in decision-making,
focusing on whether to rebuild or remodel, and considering long-term needs. They stress
clear communication about the necessity of improvements and suggest a functional,
aesthetically pleasing building that supports efficient operations. Security and facilities for
the police department are highlighted as critical. There is a call to avoid excessive
spending, ensuring the building meets community needs without unnecessary
extravagance.
Page 377 of 397
Page 60 of 76 Common Ground & Differences: Side A Rebuild or Remodel Common Ground Balancing Design and Public Needs Side B Functional and Inviting Design Some respondents
emphasize the importance
of deciding whether to
rebuild or remodel the
current facility. They stress
the need to consider the
long-term future,
suggesting that the
decision should be made
with the next 50 years in
mind. This perspective
highlights the
disappointment with the
current facility's short
lifespan and the necessity
of involving the public in
the decision-making
process.
Both sides agree on the
importance of involving
the public in the decision-
making process and
clearly communicating the
reasons behind proposed
changes. There is a shared
understanding that the
community's needs and
wants should be
considered, and that the
project should focus on
essential improvements
while allowing for future
expansions. Effective
communication is seen as
key to gaining public
support and ensuring the
project's success.
Others argue for a focus
on creating a functional
and aesthetically pleasing
building that serves the
community's needs. They
caution against
extravagant designs,
advocating instead for a
building that is both
inviting and efficient. This
view also emphasizes the
importance of security
measures, particularly for
the police department,
while ensuring the facility
supports staff effectively. Categories: •Public Engagement: Public engagement is a recurring theme among the res ponses,
emphasizing the importance of involving the community in the decision-making
process. Participants believe that communicating the need for improvements and the
benefits of proposed changes is crucial. There is a strong sentiment that the public
should be informed and brought along in the process to ensure transparency and
support. The perception is that a well-informed public will be more likely to support
the project and understand its long-term benefits. Overall, the responses suggest that
public engagement is seen as a key factor in the project's success.
•Future Planning: Future planning is highlighted as an essential consi deration, with
participants stressing the need to think long-term. There is a concern that the current
facility's lifespan was too short, and future projects should aim for longevity. The idea is
to plan for the next 50 years, ensuring that the building can adapt to future needs and
expansions. Participants express disappointment with the current facility's short
Page 378 of 397
Page 61 of 76 lifespan, indicating a desire for more sustainable and forward-thinking planning. The overall perception is that future planning should prioritize durability and adaptability. • Building Functionality: Building functionality is a significant concern, with participants emphasizing the need for a practical and efficient design. There is a call for a building that is not overly extravagant but rather functional and inviting to the community. The responses highlight the importance of creating a space that allows staff to work efficiently while also considering security measures, especially for the police department. Participants seem to value a balance between aesthetics and practicality, ensuring that the building serves its intended purpose effectively. The perception is that functionality should not be compromised for the sake of appearance. Comments: • I think process is key. We must bring our public along, determine whether it is best to rebuild or remodel, and think of the next 50 years. I am disappointed that the current facility was done in a manner that needs replacement after 30 years. • It is critically important the need for the improvement is communicated to the public. They may likely want other things, but we need to keep the project focused on the need, with a capability to add on in the future for other "wants" of the community. • We need to provide the public the benefits and the why behind the proposed changes. • No • We should not be striving to build the Taj Ma Hal. We need a functional good-looking building that is inviting to our community and allows staff the opportunity to work efficiently and effectively. Police department needs to be inviting. However, security measures are critical to their operations and officers should have a place to shower and wind down as they do their work. End of Survey Results Page 379 of 397
Page 62 of 76 Exchange Results: Page 380 of 397
Page 63 of 76 Page 381 of 397
Page 64 of 76 Page 382 of 397
Page 65 of 76 Page 383 of 397
Page 66 of 76 Appendix B
Space Utilization Preliminary
Programming
Page 384 of 397
Page 67 of 76 Page 385 of 397
Page 68 of 76 Page 386 of 397
Page 69 of 76 Page 387 of 397
Page 70 of 76 Page 388 of 397
Page 71 of 76 Page 389 of 397
Page 72 of 76 Page 390 of 397
Page 73 of 76 Appendix C
Itemized Asset List
& CIP Budgets
Page 391 of 397
City Hall & Police Station Facility Condition Assessment Page 74 of 76 Page 392 of 397
Page 75 of 76 Page 393 of 397
This page is intentionally left blank
9.c
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission
Representatives
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission Representatives.
BACKGROUND:
The City's Advisory Commissions include the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation
Commission, Airport Relations Commission and Natural Resources Commission. Members of
city advisory commissions are appointed by the City Council.
The following advisory commission members, have January 31, 2026, expiring terms, are
eligible for reappointment and have expressed their interest in serving again on their
respective commissions:
•Jennifer Weichert, Parks and Recreation
•Will Stein, Natural Resources
•Litton Field Jr. Planning Commission
•Cindy Johnson, Planning Commission
•David Sloan, Airport Relations Commission
•William Dunn, Airport Relations Commission
The following advisory commission members, have January 31, 2026 expiring terms, are
eligible for reappointment and have decided not to serve an additional term on their
respective commissions:
•Jo Shifseky, Parks and Recreation
•Rosemary Husbands, Natural Resources
Additionally, a mid-term opening on the Airport Relations Commission exists since Airport
Relations Commission member Arvind Sharma has resigned from the Commission.
Page 394 of 397
The City Council and staff will conduct the recruitment process, accepting applications and
interviewing candidates through the first part of January for one seat on the Airport Relations
Commission, one seat on the Parks and Recreation Commission, and one seat on the Natural
Resources Commission. For the open seat on the Parks and Recreation Commission, the City
Council may consider the applicants from the September/October 2025 recruitment,
depending on candidate interest.
The city council will confirm new appointments at the January 20, 2026 meeting. New
appointments will be effective February 1, 2026.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Res. 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission Representatives
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 395 of 397
Resolution 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission Representatives
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-92
REAPPOINTING CITY ADVISORY COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights benefits from the active
participation of citizens in representing the City on boards and commissions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission serves as an advisory body to the City Council.
It advises the City Council on matters pertaining to comprehensive planning, amendments to the
zoning code, conditional use permits, wetland permits, and development plans; and
WHEREAS, the Natural Resources Commission serves as an advisory body to the City
Council. It advises the Council on matters pertaining to natural resources, sustainability,
environmental and climate stewardship; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission serves as an advisory body to the
City Council. It advises the council on matters pertaining to the acquisition, development, and
improvement of the city’s parks and recreational facilities and on the establishment of rules and
regulations for the use and management of city parks; and
WHEREAS, the Airport Relations Commission serves as an advisory body to the City
Council. It advises the Council. It advises the Council on matters pertaining to airport noise and
operations at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP); and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the excellent service provided by current
advisory commission members Litton Field, Jr. and Cindy Johnson of the Planning Commission;
Jennifer Weichert of the Parks and Recreation Commission, David Sloan and William Dunn of
the Airport Relations Commission and Will Stein of the Natural Resources Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that
it hereby reappoints the following residents to city advisory commissions with terms expiring as
indicated:
Planning Litton Field Jr. January 31, 2029
Planning Cindy Johnson January 31, 2029
Airport Relations David Sloan January 31, 2030
Airport Relations William Dunn January 31, 2030
Parks and Recreation Jennifer Weichert January 31, 2029
Natural Resources Will Stein January 31, 2029
Page 396 of 397
Resolution 2025-92 Reappointing City Advisory Commission Representatives
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 16th day of December 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
______________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 397 of 397