11 05 2025 CC Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
November 5, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3.Pledge of Allegiance
4.Approval of the Agenda
The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the
agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline.
5.Public Comments - for items not on the agenda
Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not
on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their
comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested
to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to
three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask
clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up.
6.Consent Agenda
Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a
councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item,
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items
removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business.
a.Approve Minutes from the October 21, 2025, City Council Meeting
b.Approve Minutes from the October 21, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting
c.Acknowledge Minutes from the September 25, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting
d.Adopt Resolution 2025-62 Accepting a Donation from the Mendota Heights
Community Foundation
e.Approve the Closure of City Hall on Friday, December 26, 2025
f.Approve Tobacco License Renewals for 2026
g.Approve an Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement with
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 1 of 262
h.Approve Resolution 2025-69 Appointing Pau Cortes Valdes to the Parks & Recreation
Commission
i.Authorize the Purchase of Forcible Entry Training Prop for the Fire Department
j.Adopt Resolution 2025-70 Calling for Public Hearing on Municipal Consent for the
Sibley Memorial Highway Improvements and Turnback
k.Accept a proposal from and award a contract to MN Native Landscapes for the
Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement
l.Approve August and September 2025 Treasurer's Report
m.Approve Claims List
7.Presentations
a.Airport Relations Commission Update
8.Public Hearings
a.Ordinance No. 603 - Amending Title 12: Zoning, to incorporate minor updates
relating to language, terminology, clarity, and to correct citations, cross-references
and conflicting provisions (Planning Case 2025-18)
9.New and Unfinished Business
a.City of Mendota Heights Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan
b.Resolution 2025-72 Approving the application of M&M Home Contractors for a
MRCCA Permit for a residential addition to a single-family home at 1122 Orchard
Circle (Planning Case No. 2025-19)
c.Resolution 2025-73 Approving the application of Cobalt Business Center, LLC for a
CUP for a metal manufacturing use and associated outdoor storage of building
systems equipment at the property located at 1315 Mendota Heights Road (Planning
Case No. 2025-20)
d.Friendly Hills Street Improvements Assessment Roll Reconsideration for Parcels 27-
27800-21-143 and 27-27800-21-071
10.Community / City Administrator Announcements
11.City Council Comments
12.Adjourn
Next Meeting: November 18, 2025 at 6:00PM
Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals with disabilities
upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on NDC4/Town Square Television Cable Channel
18/HD798 and online at townsquare.tv/Mendota-Heights-Streaming:
Page 2 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Paper, Mazzitello, and
Maczko were also present.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Council, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No one from the public wished to be heard.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval.
Councilor Lorberbaum moved approval of the consent agenda as presented, pulling item J.
a.Approval of October 7, 2025, City Council Minutes
b.Approval of October 7, 2025, City Council Work Session Minutes
c.Approval of Minutes from the October 9, 2025, City Council Closed Session
d.Acknowledge Minutes from the July 8, 2025, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
e.Adopt Revised Personnel Policies
f.Resolution 2025-66 Accepting a Donation from the Mendota Heights Fire Relief Association
g.Approve 2025-2026 Insurance Renewal and Elect Not Waive Statutory Limits
h.Acknowledge the August Par 3 Financial Report
i.Approve Resolution 2025-67 Supporting the Dakota County 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
j.Approve Appointment of Student Representatives to the Natural Resources Commission
k.Approval of Claims List
Page 3 of 262
6.a
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 10
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
J) APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES TO THE NATURAL
RESOURCES COMMISSION
Mayor Levine thanked the two student representatives who will serve for this next term. She stated that
there are also student representatives who serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission and recognized
the importance of those voices in the community.
Mayor Levine moved to approve APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION.
Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PRESENTATIONS
No items scheduled.
PUBLIC HEARING
A)RESOLUTION 2025-68 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FRIENDLY HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie explained that the Council was being asked to approve Resolution
2025-68, adopting and confirming the assessments for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements
Project.
Councilor Paper asked why residents are being charged for the future work.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that there is not flexibility to split the assessments into 2025
and 2026. He stated that there is flexibility when an assessment hearing can be done, explaining that cities
can assess prior to a project, or upon completion of a project. He stated that if they were to postpone the
assessment hearing to 2026, the City would need to carry the $1,000,000 cost from the 2025 project
through the next year. He stated that if they were to split the project into two, the City would have had to
pay for two bonding procedures, and neighbors could have ended up with different assessments. He
explained that this combined process saves money and provides consistency.
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to open the public hearing.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page 4 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 10
Craig Wanamaker, 2331 Apache Street, asked how the City assumes payments will be made by the
residents. He asked if a lump sum payment could be made for the total assessment and whether there
would be any cost savings in choosing that method. He asked if there were prepayment penalties.
Jeff Domler, 772 Havenview Court, commented that he is within the 2026 portion of the project and has
looked forward to the streets being improved. He stated that he was impressed with the quality of the
work and proactive communication for the project. He commented that he has no issue with the cost of
the project, but could not reconcile that an assessment would be placed against his property in 2025 for
work that has not been completed.
Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, provided background information on the Friendly Hills
neighborhood. He stated that he has a single-family home on a seven-acre property with a single water
line and single access to the street. He stated that the project benefits his property to the same extent
that it benefits the other properties within the project area. He commented that they own three tax
identification properties which contain 19 lots and a vacated street, but objects to any assessment over
$5,086.04. He explained that originally, there was one tax identification parcel number for the property,
and at the insistence of Wells Fargo, when they refinanced in 2009, they had to have the mortgage on a
single tax identification parcel number. He stated that they then asked the County to create two tax
identification parcel numbers. He stated that following a dispute, they received another tax
identification parcel number. He stated that they have received assessments for two of their parcels, and
he objects to anything above one assessment, as they are only one family living on the property and
receive no more benefit than anyone else. He submitted his written notice of appeal to the assessment.
Bart Schempp, 739 Keokuk Lane, stated that he will be part of the 2026 project which has decreased by
over $2,000 from the originally proposed assessment. He asked if contingency costs were built in
during the beginning of the project and whether sufficient funds remain for the 2026 project. He asked
if the assessment would be impacted if issues arise during the 2026 project.
Gary Fischbach, 2150 Fox Place, commented that the project looks good and the assessment was
reduced from the originally proposed amount. He commented on the location of new pipes and asked
why new pipes were not placed in Fox Place. He encouraged the residents in the 2026 project area to
put pressure on Saint Paul Regional Water Service (SPRWS) to replace pipes. He believed his nice
street would be torn up again for SPRWS to repair the pipes once again.
There being no one further coming forward to speak, Councilor Maczko moved to close the public
hearing.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie noted an email received from the property owner of 2280 Ocala
Court, which he had forwarded to the Council. He stated that he spoke with the property owner this
morning, and staff will continue to monitor stormwater and drainage within the project area. He
explained how payments could be made and that if payment in full is made, the resident would not be
charged interest. He recognized that residents may view the project as incomplete if located in the 2026
area, but the project was bid as one in order to obtain better overall pricing. He recognized that while
Page 5 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 10
Mendota Heights typically holds an assessment hearing following a project, it is allowed, and some
cities choose to assess ahead of a project. He referenced the resident who spoke about having two
assessments for his two parcels and explained that Dakota County recognizes this property as two
separate units with two separate parcel identifications. He stated that the City could choose to leave the
assessment as is, could choose to remove an assessment from one of the parcels, which would shift that
$5,086.04 to the City portion of the cost, or the resident could defer the cost of the undeveloped parcel.
He explained that the reduction in the assessment from the originally proposed assessment amount was
due to the completion of the design process and bids received. He stated that if the assessment were
adopted tonight and something changed in the 2026 project, the assessment would remain the same, and
additional costs would be covered by the City or the related fund if the issue were related to a utility. He
stated that a request could be made to SPRWS to add pipe to the project, but noted that the City has had
lengthy discussions with SPRWS related to the pipe replacement. He explained that SPRWS has
evaluated the system, and he provided additional information on the looping that was done to relieve
pressure on that system.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker provided additional details on the opportunity for residents to
prepay assessments. She noted that once certified to the County, residents could still pay off the
assessment early, but the interest for the year is charged at the beginning of each year.
Councilor Maczko explained that once the assessment is certified to the County, it would then be
charged to residents with their property taxes which are paid twice per year.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that it appears people in the southern portion of the project have an issue
with being assessed now but recognized that because the project was bid as one project, paid through
one bond, it may be required that the assessment hearing be completed in one action.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker stated that the project was bid and financed as one project over
multiple years, with the assessments structured to be assessed at one time, through this hearing.
Councilor Mazzitello recognized that if the assessment hearing were completed in 2026, there would be
a significant cash drop for the City, as the City runs a lean budget.
Councilor Paper referenced the southern part of the project and recognized that while physical work has
not been completed, there have been funds spent to develop the project plans and details.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie confirmed that the City has paid design costs for the 2025 and
2026 project areas, as well as the staff time that has gone into the project.
Councilor Paper asked for more information on the watermain looping that was done and how that
relieves stress on the system.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that prior to construction, the project area was one large
loop, connected through one single pipe. He noted a connection that was abandoned and the new
connections that were added to Dodd Road.
Page 6 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 10
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek provided additional information on the loops that were created to
relieve the pressure that previously existed in the northern neighborhood.
Councilor Maczko asked how the actual costs for 2025 compared to the proposed design and bid.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that there were primarily savings received for subgrade
work, while the major items came in as anticipated.
Councilor Maczko asked who would be responsible for correcting drainage issues if those were not
resolved.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that funds for that type of improvement would come from
the storm sewer utility fund. He explained that there was no change in design, noting that the element
had been mentioned in the feasibility study but was not included in the final design for the project.
Councilor Mazzitello asked for more information on the conditions under which a resident could request
a deferral of their assessment.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie reviewed the conditions under which a resident can request a
deferral of their assessment.
Councilor Paper moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2025-68 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FRIENDLY HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Further discussion: Councilor Lorberbaum asked and received confirmation that a resident could request
a deferral of their assessment prior to November 24th.
Councilor Maczko stated that he spoke with City staff about the process that is typically followed to hold
the assessment hearing following substantial completion, but also recognized the better pricing that was
received and bond rates that were obtained by this being done as one project. He stated that if there were
any overriding costs, those would typically be due to utilities and would not be funded through
assessments. He recognized that it may feel unusual to pay for something before the project is completed,
but there are benefits in bidding the project as one. He explained that costs typically rise from one year
to the next, and therefore, if bid separately, the assessments for 2026 would most likely be higher. He
stated that if any streets need to be dug up by SPRWS, that would be at the cost of SPRWS. He referenced
the comments from Mr. Friel but was unsure as to the best option for that parcel, recognizing that they
would need to be consistent in how similar decisions are made in the future. He was unsure of the
precedent that would be set by splitting or not splitting, as there are two tax identification numbers. He
asked if there would be additional time to make that decision if the assessment were adopted tonight.
Mayor Levine agreed, recognizing the precedent that would be set by the decision.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt commented that Mr. Friel would have the option to defer the assessment, and
the Council would have the authority to modify the assessment roll. She stated that Mr. Friel has submitted
his objection, which would preserve his right to appeal or proceed with a deferment.
Page 7 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 of 10
Councilor Maczko asked if the Council would need to make the decision tonight as to whether the parcel
should be assessed as one or two.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt recommended that the Council adopt the assessment roll as that would
preserve the options for Mr. Friel to proceed with his appeal. She commented that the Council would still
have the ability to amend the assessment roll in the future, related to the two property identification parcel
numbers, if that were desired.
Mayor Levine asked if the allocation between the properties for the assessment would change if the
assessment were removed for one of Mr. Friel’s parcels.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt explained that the overall amount of the assessment would not change; the
removed parcel assessment would then fall into the City’s portion of the cost for the project.
Mayor Levine recognized that the City has a consistent method for assessing properties, based on property
identification parcel numbers, and there could be other similar claims that could be made.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek clarified that Mr. Friel does have three property identification parcel
numbers, but one is not considered developable and therefore only two assessments were proposed for
Mr. Friel’s parcels.
Mayor Levine recognized that this would be a change in policy if the Council were to divert from the
method of assessing parcels based on developable property identification parcel numbers.
Councilor Maczko commented that he would be interested in the details that were in the letter from the
City Administrator in 2009, when Mr. Friel refinanced his property. He stated that Mr. Friel has always
treated his parcels as one property, and he would not want to make a decision without having all the
information and additional time to review the precedent that could be created in making the decision.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt stated that Mr. Friel did provide a copy of the letter that she was able to
review and noted the details of the letter, which appears to be information on the administrative lot split.
She stated that if the Council were to treat this as a single unit rather than two units, it would be an
exception to the policy, rather than a change, but agreed that it would set a precedent. She noted that there
are multiple platted lots within the two property identification numbers owned by Mr. Friel.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that since 2008, there have been multiple times where there is an
undeveloped parcel next to a developed lot, and the property owner has chosen to defer the assessment on
the undeveloped lot until the time of development. He stated that if Mr. Friel were interested, he could
choose to defer the second assessment.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked and received confirmation that once the assessment roll is adopted, the
Council would still have the ability to review the Friel properties.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page 8 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 10
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) IVY HILLS PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT APPROVAL
Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence explained that the
Council was being asked to consider approval of a proposal for the replacement of the playground at Ivy
Hills Park.
Councilor Paper commented that this looks like a terrific project that meets the desires expressed earlier
this summer. He also appreciated that the company would be repurposing the current equipment in some
way. He referenced the rocks shown in the sketch and asked if those would be part of the project.
Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence confirmed that the
rocks are part of the project and do serve a purpose.
Councilor Paper commented that this proposal seems to provide the best value for the price and noted that
the slide looks like a great feature that will be popular. He asked about the type of maintenance required
for the spinner. He noted that part of the spinner would be at-grade, while the mechanism would be
underground, and commented on how kids like to put rocks and sticks into spaces like that.
Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence replied that the
spinner would be on poured-in-place surfacing, which reduces woodchips from coming into contact with
the spinner, but recognized that contact could still occur. She noted that parks staff do a visual inspection
of items on a playground. She was unsure of the exact maintenance needs, but noted that the City has
great experience with this vendor and their warranty. She commented that there are features on the
playgrounds that break and need repair throughout the park system, and this would be no different.
Councilor Paper commented that he would prefer the musical feature, as it looked like a fun option for
kids who do not want to use the other equipment. He stated that in terms of color, he prefers vibrant colors
and would prefer primary colors.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked if the poured-in-place surface would extend to the sidewalk or the entrance
to the park. She asked if someone could go from the parking lot to the playground in a wheelchair.
Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence replied that the
poured-in-place surfacing would meet the asphalt pad for the playground, which connects to the existing
trail, which connects to the parking lot.
Mayor Levine confirmed the consensus of the Council to proceed with the proposal recommended by the
Parks and Recreation Commission and asked for input on the color and preference of the musical element
versus the spinner.
Councilor Maczko commented on the importance of a light-colored slide and therefore could support the
color recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Page 9 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 8 of 10
Councilor Lorberbaum commented that the Parks and Recreation Commission also chose the cool blue
colors because of the likelihood of a light-colored slide. She stated that while she would prefer primary
colors, she could support either option.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that he would prefer the forest colors, as those are the colors typically
chosen by the County, but he does not have a strong preference.
Mayor Levine commented that she would defer to the choice of the Parks and Recreation Commission for
the color choice. She confirmed the consensus of the Council in support of the cool blue color choice.
Councilor Lorberbaum commented that in the discussion of her grandkids, they felt that while the musical
feature would be fun and they may try it, they would spend more time on the spinner. She stated that she
spoke with a few residents her age who echoed the comments of her grandchildren. She stated that she
spoke with a Park Commissioner who was not present at the meeting, who also echoed the comment that
the musical feature would be fun, and more time would be spent on the spinner. She stated that she visited
the park and spoke with a family with three small children, one of whom has some limitations based on
needs, and they were unanimous in their choice of the spinner. She commented that it seems that everyone
she spoke with provided the same preference for the spinner.
Councilor Maczko commented that his wife takes the grandkids to the parks a lot, and they had the same
response in that the kids may use the musical elements for a few minutes, but more time is spent on the
spinner. He stated that, based on the input he and Councilor Lorberbaum received, he would also support
the spinner.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that he preferred the musical feature as he is someone who loves music, noting
that this would be an opportunity for kids to learn. He commented that he also believed that one of the
reasons the first proposals were rejected was that the accessible feature was a spinner.
Mayor Levine commented that the original bids were rejected because there was no poured-in-place
surfacing around the spinner and, therefore, it was not accessible.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked if the neighbors would hear the noise from the musical feature and whether
they would object to hearing that.
Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence replied that she did
not have that answer. She commented that there is no home abutting the playground, but was not
comfortable answering that question tonight.
Councilor Maczko commented that he appreciated the bid alternative as that clearly shows the cost for the
accessible swing, which is a high cost for one feature.
Councilor Lorberbaum stated that the member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, whom she spoke
with, has a child in a wheelchair, and she even acknowledged that, as nice as the feature would be, the
price is too high.
Page 10 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 9 of 10
Mayor Levine commented that her choice would be the spinner. She stated that she has even seen teens
using the spinner at another park in the community. She noted that the spinner is true to what they asked
all vendors to provide, and in an online search, she found that spinners were more popular than the musical
features. She noted that the Somerset playground has both the spinner and musical features, and while
she enjoyed both elements, she believes the spinner will be the more popular option.
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to approve THE PROPOSAL FROM NORTHLAND RECREATION FOR
THE REPLACEMENT OF THE PLAYGROUND AT IVY HILLS PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF
$200,000 IN THE COOL BLUE COLOR SCHEME AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION, WITH THE ACCESSIBLE SPINNER WITH THE ASSURANCE
THAT THERE IS POURED-IN-PLACE SURFACING FOR A WHEELCHAIR TO GET FROM THE
PARKING LOT DOWN THE SIDEWALK TO THE PARK.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Further discussion: Mayor Levine commented that she is pleased with the outcome, recognizing the longer
process. She believed that this playground better reflects the desire of the community while also being
mindful of residents with mobility issues. She thanked the residents who were involved in this process,
the Parks and Recreation Commission, the task force, the vendors, and City staff for their input and
patience throughout this process.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming community events and activities.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilor Lorberbaum thanked Parks and Recreation staff and the firefighters, as it has been a busy
October between the fire station open house and parks and recreation events.
Councilor Maczko echoed the comments that October has been busy for staff. He stated that the upcoming
municipal campus open house on October 28, 2025, is important as the City Council will need to make
decisions to address space issues, particularly for the police. He recognized the high cost and explained
that transparency and resident input will be an important part of that process, encouraging residents to
attend the open house.
Councilor Paper wished all the fall sports teams’ good luck with their playoffs and tournaments.
Councilor Mazzitello also asked residents to attend the open house on October 28, 2025, to find out
information about the project for themselves and provide their input. He also wished the local sports
teams’ good luck in their tournaments. He stated that this month is Italian American Heritage Month, and
Indigenous Peoples Day was also last week. He stated that day is to welcome all people and to celebrate
and commemorate on that day all who have felt persecution, discrimination, or, in some cases, violence.
Page 11 of 262
October 21, 2025 Mendota Heights City Council Page 10 of 10
Mayor Levine provided input on the recent trick-or-teeing event and thanked all who participated. She
also thanked those who attended the fire open house. She commented on what a great community Mendota
Heights is and thanked everyone who attended the meeting tonight to provide their input.
ADJOURN
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adjourn.
Councilor Maczko seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Nancy Bauer
City Clerk
Page 12 of 262
October 21, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was
held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Maczko
(4:47 p.m.), Mazzitello (4:45 p.m.), and Paper were in attendance.
Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly
Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Parks &
Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, Assistant City
Engineer Lucas Ritchie, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer.
WATER SURCHARGE
Public Works Director Ruzek reported that prior to 2016, the City of Mendota Heights purchased
water wholesale from St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) and owned the water system.
The City imposed a 10% surcharge to fund water main replacements and other capital
improvements. When the system was turned over to SPRWS in 2016, the surcharge was reduced
to 5%. The current surcharge generates approximately $130,000 annually, and the Water Utility
Fund balance has grown to over $1 million. As there are no known upcoming capital
improvements, staff recommended reducing the surcharge unless the Council intends to fund
future water projects.
Director Ruzek explained that surcharge funds are used for water-related costs such as valve and
hydrant adjustments, relocating water infrastructure for street and trail projects, utility billing
fees to SPRWS, and maintenance such as painting hydrants and installing markers. The funds
could also support new projects, including adding drinking fountains, extending water service to
the dog park, or supplying water to community gardens.
Reducing the surcharge would require an amendment to the agreement with SPRWS. Finance
Director Schabacker noted that SPRWS would prefer any amendment take effect in January or
February 2026.
In discussion, Councilor Paper asked about potential unforeseen expenses. Director Ruzek noted
that a water extension to the Oheyawahe site is being considered and that the City is responsible
for adjusting water valves during street projects at approximately $30,000 per year, while
Page 13 of 262
6.b
October 21, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2
moving a hydrant costs $10,000–$15,000. In response to a question, he confirmed the City would
not be responsible for repainting the water tower. He also noted SPRWS charges $0.36 per
mailed bill, totaling under $10,000 annually.
Director Ruzek added that the eight-inch auto fire service lines serving public buildings are over
30 years old and nearing the end of their warranty, and repairs would be the City’s responsibility
if failures occur.
Following the discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to reduce the water surcharge to
2.5%.
RETAIN SURPLUS VEHICLES
Public Works Director Ruzek stated that the Fire Department recently put into service a new
brush truck. The new truck replaces a 2009 pickup truck with low miles (8,000 miles) that has
been stored indoors throughout its life. Staff would like to repurpose the vehicle for mounting a
proposed message board for the Street and Utility Departments. The vehicle is painted red and
would be highly visible. The additional costs to retain the vehicle would include general
maintenance. Due to the age of the vehicle, it is not expected to sell at a high value at auction.
Another vehicle being replaced is the Fire Chief’s 2009 Tahoe. The vehicle has been well-
maintained and stored indoors. Staff are proposing to use this vehicle at the Par 3 golf course.
The budget currently includes $1,000 for mileage reimbursement for the Par 3 staff, which would
be eliminated if the vehicle is retained. This vehicle also would not be expected to return much
value at auction.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked about the cost of repainting a vehicle. Public Works Director
Ruzek stated that an estimate was solicited a couple of years ago for a vehicle wrap, and the cost
at that time was approximately $2,000.
Councilor Paper asked if there was space indoors to store the vehicles. Public Works Director
Ruzek stated that the vehicle proposed for the Par 3 golf course would be stored indoors at the
Par 3 maintenance garage, and the other vehicle would not.
Parks & Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence added that
retaining a vehicle for the Par 3 would create additional budget savings by eliminating mileage
reimbursements.
Councilor Paper asked about the cost of insuring the vehicles. Finance Director Schabacker
stated that while she did not have the exact figure, the cost is minimal.
Councilor Mazzitello asked whether employees use their personal vehicles for city business.
Public Works Director Ruzek confirmed that they do, as the City does not have enough vehicles
for all staff. Mileage reimbursements are paid when city vehicles are unavailable.
Page 14 of 262
October 21, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3
Councilor Mazzitello noted that when the Fleet Replacement Program was implemented, the
goal was to replace vehicles before their value declined. Public Works Director Ruzek clarified
that the Fire Department operates under its own fleet policy, and these vehicles are exceptions.
Councilor Maczko stated he supports this item and asked how many vehicles the city currently
has. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that there are currently 13 administrative staff and five
available vehicles, with two vehicles that are assigned specifically to staff based on their job
duties. There are also two summer interns that may need access to a vehicle.
City Administrator Jacobson stated that staff access to vehicles is needed more in the summer
and that Public Works seasonal staff also need access to vehicles.
Councilor Maczko asked about renting vehicles in the summer. City Administrator Jacobson
stated that staff have explored the feasibility of renting vehicles, but that the idea was not cost
effective.
Councilor Paper stated that the vehicles were more valuable to the city than if they were sold at
auction.
The consensus was to retain the two vehicles for city use.
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY TURNBACK
Public Works Director Ruzek stated that the Sibley Memorial Highway turnback has been
discussed since 1994. Staff are working with MnDOT, which proposed a budget of $3.1 million
for a mill and overlay project which is expected to last for 12-15 years. Additionally, MnDOT
has identified additional storm sewer improvements, acquisition of easements, and right-of-way
acquisition. MnDOT also offered to provide $3.1 million to the City, with the City coordinating
the street improvements. The cost of the stormwater improvements is unknown.
The question for consideration is whether to allow MnDOT to complete the project, knowing
that the roadway will need to be redone in 12 to 15 years and that the funds would not be
recouped through future highway turnback allocations. In the future, when the roadway requires
reconstruction, the City could consider converting the roadway into a cul-de-sac; however, two
businesses in the area would likely be opposed to this option.
Staff requested confirmation from the Council that the intent remains to keep Sibley Memorial
Highway as an open roadway. The current average daily traffic on the roadway is approximately
1,800 vehicles.
Assistant City Engineer Ritchie stated that if the roadway was made into a cul-de-sac, Municipal
State Aid funds could not be used because the roadway would be taken off the municipal state
aid system.
Page 15 of 262
October 21, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 4
Councilor Maczko asked if the road was on the municipal state aid system. Public Works
Director Ruzek stated that it is and was above the city’s allocated mileage.
Councilor Maczko asked if the mileage could be transferred elsewhere if the roadway were
removed, or if different rules apply because it is a state highway turnback. Public Works Director
Ruzek stated that while it remains a functioning through road, the City can still add it to the state
aid system and draw funds for maintenance. If it were made into a cul-de-sac and maintenance
funds were used, those funds might need to be repaid to MnDOT.
Public Works Director Ruzek stated that approximately $1 million of bluff stabilization work
would be needed in addition to the mill and overlay project. He reiterated that he would not
recommend the City accept the funds and take ownership of the roadway as-is and that collecting
state aid funds over a 12-to-15-year period may cover the cost of a future road project.
Councilor Maczko asked if the bluff stabilization work would also be the responsibility of the
City once the road was turned back. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that the bluff
stabilization work would be done by MnDOT if MnDOT coordinated the mill and overlay
project before it was turned back to the City. The right-of-way would also then be turned over to
the City as part of the turnback.
Councilor Maczko stated that if the road were to be made into a cul-de-sac, it then would be
removed from the municipal state aid system, and state aid funding would stop for the road.
Councilor Paper asked why the businesses would not like the road to be a cul-de-sac. Public
Works Director stated because it would limit access to their businesses.
Public Works Director Ruzek stated that a meeting with MnDOT was scheduled to discuss the
turnback. Mayor Levine asked if he had sufficient direction for the meeting; he replied that he
did.
Councilor Mazzitello stated he would like to see the stormwater improvements completed,
ribbon curbing installed, a mill and overlay performed, municipal state aid funding collected, and
the right-of-way transferred.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilor Paper made a motion to adjourn the work session, seconded by Councilor Mazzitello.
Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
_________________________
ATTEST: Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
_____________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 16 of 262
September 25, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 4
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2025
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday,
September 23, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, at 7:00 P.M.
The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Commissioners Cindy Johnson,
Brian Udell, Jason Stone, and Jeff Nath. Those absent: Commissioners Patrick Corbett and Steve
Goldade.
Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as submitted.
Approval of August 26, 2025, Minutes
COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 26, 2025.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Hearings
A) PLANNING CASE 2025-17
M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1867 HUNTER LANE – CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the
applicant and owner's representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has
requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 22 feet,
11.75 inches for the construction of a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no
comments or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a
presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the
City’s website). Two additional comments were received this afternoon and provided to the
Commission at tonight’s meeting, along with a printed copy for meeting attendees.
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Page 17 of 262
6.c
September 25, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 4
Mike Fritz, M&M Home Contractors, commented that he was present to address any questions of
the Commission.
Chair Field opened the public hearing.
Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, commented that he lives to the north of this property and has lived
there for 41 years. He stated that he is very happy that this empty lot will be developed for families.
He stated that Mr. Fritz approached him to ask his opinion on the development, and he appreciated
that. He supported the request.
John Cosgriff, 1875 Hunter Lane, stated that he and his wife live south of the development and are
also supportive. He asked that the Commission revisit the new rule related to evening of heights
based on surrounding residences, as he believes that the rule creates harm to residents. He stated
that this will diminish the number of builds, lower property values, and result in existing residents
paying higher taxes. He believed that the policy could be improved and asked that the Commission
consider that as a future adjustment.
Matt Collins, 543 Abby Way, commented that he is an attorney for M&M Home Contractors and
referenced the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, one of which is to improve the housing stock. He
also commented on the intent and purpose of the zoning related to orderly development. He
believed that the request met the criteria for the Conditional Use Permit. He noted that the previous
home on this lot was a 1960s rambler and spoke of how the proposed new home would be an
improvement for the property. He stated that both neighbors support the request. He asked that
the Commission not table this request, as the project had already been tabled at a previous meeting,
and commented on the hardship that has been placed on the buyer for the property.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close
the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) BY M&M HOME
CONTRACTORS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1867 HUNTER LANE, WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1.A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED AND ISSUED BY THE CITY PRIOR
TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. ALL APPLICABLE ZONING,
BUILDING, AND MRCCA REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
2.THE BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 21 FEET, 1175 INCHES, AS
MEASURED PER DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT IN CITY CODE.
Page 18 of 262
September 25, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 4
3. THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED AND DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2025.
4. STREET-FACING ORNAMENTAL ROOF ELEMENTS EXCEEDING A 9:12 PITCH
SHALL BE PERMITTED AS SUBORDINATE FEATURES, PROVIDED THEY DO
NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENT.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 7, 2025,
meeting.
B) PLANNING CASE 2025-18
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS – ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that the City of Mendota Heights
approved the Zoning Code Update project in September 2024, which went into full force and effect
on January 1, 2025. Following the approval of this ordinance, staff began implementing the new
zoning ordinance provisions and began taking note of sections of the ordinance that contained
minor errors or conflicts, or specific citations that needed clarification or minor “housekeeping”
changes.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; one letter
was received related to residential building height recently, but not specifically related to this
ordinance amendment request and public hearing, and was included in the packet.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a
presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the
City’s website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions and
noted that this item would be a public hearing this evening.
Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the B-1 district.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that B-1 is general business while B-2
is neighborhood business.
Commissioner Johnson recalled that there was a lot of discussion related to the research facilities
and lab testing uses, and believed that those uses were meant to exist as conditional uses.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that the existing laboratory use is within
the B-1 district and believed that the specific location initially received a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP). She provided details on the areas currently designated as B-1.
Page 19 of 262
September 25, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 4
Commissioner Johnson stated that she would tend to err on the side of requiring a CUP for that
use.
Chair Field and the other members of the Commission agreed that the change would make sense.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER UDELL, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE TITLE
12 – ZONING AS OUTLINED IN SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 10 OF THE REDLINED
ORDINANCE, WITH THE CHANGE TO SECTION TWO, TO CHANGE TO CUP.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 7, 2025,
meeting.
New and Unfinished Business
Staff Announcements / Updates
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided an update on items of interest to the
Commission.
Adjournment
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:44 P.M.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Page 20 of 262
6.d
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-62 Accepting a Donation from the Mendota Heights
Community Foundation
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural
Resources Coordinator
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2025-62 accepting a donation from the Mendota Heights Community
Foundation in the amount of $1,000.00 towards educational signage at the Friendly Hills
Children's Pollinator Garden.
BACKGROUND:
By state law, all donations to the City must be accepted by the City Council by means of a
resolution.
The Friendly Hills Children's Garden was planted at Friendly Hills Park near the playground on
August 18th of this year. This project was led by Parks and Recreation staff along with Natural
Resources Staff.
The City received a $1,000 cash donation from the Mendota Heights Community Foundation.
The City is grateful for the generosity of this donation.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-62 Accepting Donation from the Mendota Heights Community
Foundation
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy,
Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 21 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-62
FORMALLY ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights desires to follow Minnesota Statute 465.03
“Gifts to Municipalities”; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statute requires a resolution to accept gifts to municipalities;
and
WHEREAS, the City has previously acknowledged gifts with a resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights has duly considered this
matter and wishes to acknowledge the civic mindedness of citizens and officially recognize their
donations.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights formally accepts $1,000 from the Mendota Heights Community Foundation
for educational signage at the Friendly Hills Children’s Pollinator Garden.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on this 5th day of November, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 22 of 262
6.e
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Closure of City Hall on Friday, December 26, 2025
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the closure of City Hall on Friday, December 26, 2025.
BACKGROUND:
The city's 2025 holiday schedule includes December 24 and December 25. This year, these
days fall on Wednesday and Thursday, respectively. Given the timing of the holidays, many
staff are asking for Friday, December 26 off. Due to the challenge of staffing City Hall for the
four hours that it is open on December 26, staff are requesting that the City Council close City
Hall on Friday, December 26.
This designation will not change the allocation of holidays for staff; staff may still work on
December 26, but City Hall will be closed to the public for that day.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 23 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
6.f
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Tobacco License Renewals for 2026
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Tobacco License Renewals for 2026
BACKGROUND:
Tobacco licenses will expire December 31, 2025. Four tobacco license renewal applications
have been submitted for 2026. They are:
Mendota Liquor Barrel, 766 North Plaza Drive
Wieland Inc./Mendota Auto Service, 2023 Dodd Road
Northern Tier Retail LLC/Speedway #4516, 1200 Mendota Heights Road
Northern Tier Retail LLC/Speedway #4520, 1080 Highway 62
All four applications are complete, the fees paid, all have successfully passed a background
check, and are ready for City Council approval.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 24 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
6.g
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve an Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement with
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve an Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement with TimeSaver Off Site
Secretarial, Inc.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Mendota Heights has been contracting a recording secretary since 1996 for the
preparation of minutes for the City Council regular meetings, the Parks and Recreation
Commission, the Planning Commission, and the Natural Resources Commission.
In 2019, Time Saver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. was contracted as the Recording Secretary Service.
They have submitted an addendum to the Agreement that extends the expiration date of the
agreement to December 31, 2026, along with a rate increase for 2026. The rate increase is to
accommodate a COLA increase and to cover the mandated family medical leave program.
The unit rates reflect an increase of $1.50 per hour and $.50 cents per page. The base rate
reflects an increase of less than 3.5%. The determination between applying a base rate or a
unit rate is influenced by a few factors. In general, meetings that require more detailed
minutes are billed at the unit rate. In some cases, the length of the meeting may also warrant
the use of the unit rate, even when the minutes are in a summary format. Both the base rate
and the page rate are calculated, and the higher of the two is applied.
The two rate structures are designed to balance the needs of both their employees and their
clients. The base rate provides consistency and predictability for all parties, while the unit rate
allows for adequate compensation when a meeting requires additional time or effort.
Rates:
Page 25 of 262
2025
Base rate: $172.00 for any meeting up to one hour plus $40.50 for each thirty (30)
minutes following the first one hour or
Unit Rate: $55.50 for the first hour of meeting time and $37.00 for every hour after the
first hour plus $17.00 for each page of draft minutes
2026
Base rate: $178.00 for any meeting up to one hour plus $41.00 for each thirty (30)
minutes following the first one hour or
Unit Rate: $57.00 for the first hour of meeting time and $38.00 for every hour after the
first hour plus $17.50 for each page of draft minutes
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The service for TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. is a budgeted expense.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Services 2026 Addendum to Recording Secretary Service
Agreement
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy
Page 26 of 262
Page 27 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
6.h
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Resolution 2025-69 Appointing Pau Cortes Valdes to the Parks &
Recreation Commission
ITEM TYPE: Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Noel Mills Ford, Administrative
Special Projects Coordinator
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2025-69 Appointing Pau Cortes Valdes to the Parks & Recreation
Commission.
BACKGROUND:
On Oct. 20, the City Council held interviews to select an appointee to a vacant position on the
Parks & Recreation Commission. The Council received eight applications and interviewed six
applicants. The Council selected Pau Cortes Valdes to fill the vacancy.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-69 Appointing Pau Cortes Valdes to the Parks & Recreation Commission
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 28 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-69
APPOINTING PAU CORTES VALDES TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights benefits from the active
participation of citizens in representing the City on boards and commissions; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission is an advisory body to the City
Council. They advise the council on matters pertaining to the acquisition, development and
improvements of the city’s parks and recreational facilities and on the establishment of rules and
regulations for the use and management of city parks; and
WHEREAS, a vacancy with a term expiring January 31, 2028, exists on the Parks and
Recreation Commission; and
WHEREAS, applications from interested residents were sought and interviews were
conducted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the excellent qualifications of Mendota
Heights resident Pau Cortes Valdes to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that
it hereby appoints Pau Cortes Valdes to the Parks and Recreation Commission to fill a
commissioner term expiring January 31, 2028.
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 5th day of November 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
______________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 29 of 262
6.i
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Authorize the Purchase of Forcible Entry Training Prop for the Fire
Department
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief
ACTION REQUEST:
Authorize the purchase of a forcible entry training prop for the Fire Department at the quoted
amount of $8,790 from East Coast Rescue Solutions.
BACKGROUND:
Forcible entry is a critical skill in the fire service, essential for gaining access during
emergencies and ensuring the safety of both victims and firefighters. Currently, the
department lacks a functional training prop for this skill. Our existing home-built prop is
inoperable, limiting training to verbal walkthroughs rather than hands-on practice.
To provide realistic and repeated training opportunities, the department proposes purchasing
a commercial-grade forcible entry prop. This tool will be used in regular training sessions and
fire academy instruction, eliminating the need to transport recruits to neighboring
departments for limited exposure.
Quotes were obtained from multiple manufacturers, with the lowest priced and most suitable
option totaling $8,790—including $7,895 for the prop and $895 for delivery via liftgate-
equipped truck.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
This is not a budgeted expense. However, the Fire Department has sufficient funds available in
its 2025 training budget and Coss Family Foundation funds to cover the purchase.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Quote from East Coast Rescue Solutions
2.Use Case Document (Preliminary Draft)
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 30 of 262
Quote
Date
10/22/2025
Estimate #
7319
Name / Address
Mendota Heights Fire Department
2121 Dodd Rd
St Paul, MN 55120
Ship To
Mendota Heights Fire Department
2121 Dodd Rd
St Paul, MN 55120
East Coast Rescue Solutions
4940 Merrick Road Suite 172
Massapequa Park, NY 11762
P.O. No.Terms Due Date
10/22/2025
Rep
CM
Contact us with any questions. Chris Minichiello- owner
917-886-579.
chris.ecrs@gmail.com
Total
Description Qty Rate Total
East Coast Rescue Solutions Forcible Entry Door Simulator.
Door Features: GEN 3 DOOR - NO DROP BAR
Inward and outward swinging forces
Full Door Stop 65"
Three Locks for varying degrees of difficulty
2x2 and 1x2 wood block used for resistance
Replaceable Door Sleeve and Jamb for added longevity
Fixed bracket to mount walls for restricted space FE
Can be dissembled for easy transport.
Optional dolly system for easy transport is available
Adjustable door gap - outward swing
All In-One Prop Receivers
Professionally powder coated
Two year warranty
Includes Operational Guide and Videos
1 7,000.00 7,000.00
East Coast Rescue Solutions Door Dolly System
The ECRS Door Dolly System allows you to easily lift and move
your Forcible Entry Door Prop. Dolly rated for 1500 pounds.
1 895.00 895.00
Drop Ship Prop to St Paul, MN 55120
Includes Liftgate service
1 895.00 895.00
Does not include tax if applicable. A 3% fee for Credit Card
payments will be added
0.00 0.00
$8,790.00
Page 31 of 262
1
Mendota Heights Fire Department
Training Department Memo
Date: October 22, 2025
To: Scott Goldenstein, Assistant Chief
Dan Johnson, Chief
From: Becky Johnson, Training Captain
Re: Purchase of Forcible Entry Training Prop
I am writing to request the purchase of a forcible entry training prop for our fire department. Forcible
entry is one of the most critical skills in the fire service—it can mean the difference between gaining
timely access to save a life or facing delays that put both victims and firefighters at greater risk. Like
all hands-on skills, it must be regularly practiced in realistic conditions to be performed effectively
under stress.
Currently, our department does not own a functional forcible entry prop. We have a home-built prop,
but it does not operate properly, limiting our firefighters to “talking through” the motions rather than
truly practicing the skill. As a result, our members are not able to build and maintain proficiency.
For our fire academy, we have been transporting recruits to a South Metro Station 1 so they can
experience the skill on that department’s prop. However, due to time constraints, this allows only a
single exposure during the academy. This does not provide the repeated practice necessary for skill
development and retention. Having our own prop would allow us to incorporate forcible entry into
regular training sessions, ensuring our firefighters are better prepared for real-world emergencies.
This investment would provide a long-term, durable training tool that will serve both current firefighters
and future recruits for many years. I strongly believe that equipping our department with this prop will
significantly enhance our training program and, ultimately, the safety and effectiveness of our
emergency response.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Page 32 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
6.j
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-70 Calling for Public Hearing on Municipal Consent
for the Sibley Memorial Highway Improvements and Turnback
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-70 Calling for a Public Hearing on a Minnesota State Department of
Transportation Project to Rehabilitate Sibley Memorial Highway Including a Turnback to the
City of Mendota Heights.
BACKGROUND:
The Minnesota State Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is planning on rehabilitating
Sibley Memorial Highway in advance of a turnback to the City. As part of the design process,
MnDOT needs to ask for local government approval of design.
In order to properly request local government approval, there needs to be a Public Hearing
before the local governmental body; in this case, the Mendota Heights City Council. Municipal
Consent is required due to the turnback of the roadway including right-of-way, easements,
and the road itself.
The attached Resolution 2025-70 calls for a public hearing to be held before the Mendota
Heights City Council on December 16, 2025. Setting this date for a public hearing will allow
for adequate notice to be published.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
No budget impact other than staff time to prepare and publish the meeting notice.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Res 2025-70 Calling for a Public Hearing on a MN State Dept of Transportation Project to
Rehabilitate Sibley Memorial Highway Including a Turnback
2.Sibley Memorial Highway coversheet
3.MN Statutes 161.162-161.167-1503388-v1
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Page 33 of 262
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive
and Responsive Government
Page 34 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-70
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A MINNESOTA STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TO REHABILITATE SIBLEY
MEMORIAL HIGHWAY INCLUDING A TURBACK TO THE CITY OF MENDOTA
HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final layout for State
Project 1901-195 on Sibley Memorial Highway, from Highway 13 to Highway 13 within the
City of Mendota Heights for grading, bituminous mill and overlay, ADA improvements and
signal revision; and seeks the approval thereof, as described in Minnesota Statutes 161.162 to
161.167: and
WHEREAS, said final layout is on file in the Metro District Minnesota Department of
Transportation office, Roseville, Minnesota, being marked as Layout No. 1 and 1A, S.P. 1901-
195, from R.P. 11+34 to 82+29; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mendota Heights City Council will
consider the Local Government Approval, and a public hearing shall be held on such proposed
approval on the 16th day of December, 2025, before the City Council in the Mendota Heights
City Hall located at 1101 Victoria Curve at 6:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to give published, posted, and mailed notice of such
hearing as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this fifth day of November, 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY________________________________
ATTEST Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
BY_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 35 of 262
Page 36 of 262
Page 37 of 262
Page 38 of 262
Page 39 of 262
Page 40 of 262
Page 41 of 262
Page 42 of 262
Page 43 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
6.k
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Accept a proposal from and award a contract to MN Native Landscapes for
the Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural
Resources Coordinator
ACTION REQUEST:
Accept the proposal from and award a contract to MN Native Landscapes for the Rogers Lake
Shoreline Enhancement.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the City of Mendota Heights update to its Natural Resource Management Plan
(2022), the northern shoreline along Rogers Lake within Rogers Lake Park was identified as a
priority project. A portion of this shoreline was restored in the past but has since continued to
be inundated with invasive plant species, or species that have established as a monoculture,
resulting in a decline of plant diversity.
The goal of the project is to enhance and restore approximately 11,000 square feet of
shoreline buffer, protect existing native plants, reduce erosion, and protect the water quality of
Rogers Lake. The project will include, but is not limited to the following tasks:
•Development of a Restoration and Management Plan (R&M Plan) for the project area.
•Removal of invasive species, including buckthorn.
•Treatment of invasive woody species, as well as herbaceous invasives.
•Installation of native seed and live plant plugs, using seed mixes and plants, including
graminoid and forb, as well as some native shrubs, that are locally sourced, native to
central Minnesota, and suitable to site conditions.
•Where and when appropriate, erosion and sediment control Best Management
Practices (BMPs) will be utilized to protect Rogers Lake throughout the project.
Staff sent a Request for Proposals to several qualified restoration firms in the area. One
proposal was received, submitted by MN Native Landscapes for the amount of $21,157.50. The
attached proposal includes proposed tasks, timelines and an itemized budget.
Page 44 of 262
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
MN Native Landscapes is proposing to complete the project for the amount of $21,157.50. The
project was included in the 2025 Natural Resources budget for the amount of $34,518.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement - MNL Proposal 10-21-25
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure,
Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 45 of 262
8740 77th St NE, Otsego MN 55362 763-295-0010 MNLcorp.com
Krista Spreiter
Natural Resources Coordinator
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Subject: Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement
To Whom It May Concern,
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our statement of qualifications for Rogers Lake Shoreline
Enhancement. Ecological restoration has been the focal point of our firm for more than 25 years, and we
have a staff of passionate people ready to put their talents to work for resource-minded clients to improve
and protect our lands and waters.
The MNL restoration team for this project includes decades of staff experience led by company founder
Joe Schaffer, along with Daniel Tix, Josh Hanson, Jeff Renier, and others.
MNL’s mission is simple, to “Heal the Earth”. We execute this mission through our five core values:
Passion for our mission, Grit to get the job done, maintaining a culture of exceptional Craftsmanship,
approaching every opportunity with eagerness and Innovation, and finally encouraging Positivity in all
areas to create successful outcomes.
Attached to our statement of qualifications you will find our company history, service and project types,
key personnel, project examples, references, and equipment inventory.
Our team is excited to be considered for the Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement, and we look forward
to discussing our qualifications and expertise further.
Sincerely,
Josh Hanson
Senior Estimator
612-390-9047
josh.hanson@MNLcorp.com
Page 46 of 262
2
Company Background
Founded in 1998 - MNL, a women owned business, is a leading provider of comprehensive ecological
restoration services and premium native seed/plants. Our four Minnesota operational facilities include
our headquarters in Otsego, and seed production farms in Foley, Glyndon, and Lonsdale. MNL operates
under six main divisions Professional Services, Construction Services, Vegetation Management Services,
Grazing Services, Red Rock Fire, and MNL Seed & Plant Production. Between these divisions, we draw on
decades of experience to solve the ecological challenges of our diverse base of clientele. Whether the
goal of your project is water quality improvement, creating new wildlife habitat, soil stabilization, or
improving your landscapes aesthetics, we have the capabilities to design, implement and manage various
ecological processes as part of your project.
With over 130 dedicated professionals on our team, and through the completion of more than 1,000
ecological service projects each year, MNL is continually developing innovative solutions tailored for
wetlands, prairies, streambanks, rain gardens and shorelines. Our hands-on expertise of site construction,
installation services and vegetation management best practices ensure successful restoration outcomes
across an array of ecological systems. MNL clients encompass a full range of private and public sector
organizations including city and county governments, watershed and conservation districts, state
agencies, environmentally conscious energy developers and private landowners. In addition to our work
throughout Minnesota, MNL provides various products and services to clientele throughout the U.S.
Services & Project Types
•Professional Services
o Wetland services, vegetation management planning and monitoring, stormwater management
planning and permitting, workshops and speaking engagements, research opportunities, stormwater
and erosion BMP design, custom seed mix design, seed procurement and brokerage, ecological
restoration landscaping and design
o Design/Build Project Management
•Construction Services
o Conservation seeding & plant installation, rain garden & infiltration basin construction, lakeshores &
streambanks, bioengineering (riprap, toe wood, tree revetment, brush fascines and mattresses, live
staking), wetland creation
•Vegetation Management Services
o Mowing, spot cutting, aquatic and terrestrial invasive species control, tree and brush removal, plant
community enhancement
•Grazing Services
o Conservation grazing, solar grazing, fire fuel reduction, prairie management
•Red Rock Fire Services
o Prescribed burns, wildland wildfire suppression, emergency management
•Native Seed & Plants
Page 47 of 262
3
Project Description
Project Overview:
The Rogers Lake Shoreline Enhancement Project was identified as a priority project during the City of
Mendota Height’s 2022 Natural Resources Management Plan. There was a shoreline buffer project that
was previously installed but has not been effectively managed and is need of an enhancement. Our
proposal will provide a restoration plan for enhancement that includes itemized activities, a proposed
schedule of activities, along with project pricing.
Project Area:
Approximately 0.28 AC or 12,197 SF
Page 48 of 262
4
Description of Proposed Restoration Activities:
Fall 2025-
1.Cut, treat and remove all invasive and undesirable tree and shrub species. Care will be taken not
to damage native trees and shrubs designated to remain.
2.Mow and/or weed whip the entire shoreline buffer enhancement area.
Spring 2026-
1.Conduct an aggressive weed control visit targeting non-native and undesirable herbaceous
species within the shoreline buffer enhancement area. This does not include targeting the existing
cattail zone. Our proposal does include any attempt to target and remove cattails from the waters
edge.
2.After allowing dieback, aggressively disturb all sprayed out areas to allow for seeding and planting
activities.
3.After site preparation, hand broadcast MNL Lakeshore Mix at 2-times the normal rate. Following
broadcast seeding, MNL would propose to install 1,355 native plugs. Species list to be developed
from native seed mix and site conditions.
Post-Installation 2026-
1.Conduct 2 vegetation management site visits in the 2026 growing season. Site visits could include
spot mowing and/or spot treatment in order to promote the establishment of a diverse native
shoreline buffer.
Proposed Seed Mix:
Page 49 of 262
5
Project Pricing
Pricing Breakdown:
Mobilization, File Management, Project Administration, and Project Management - $1,700.00
Fall 2026 – Cut, Treat, and Remove Existing Woody Species and Site Mowing – $3,760.00
Spring 2026 Spot Herbicide Application - $750.00
Spring 2026 Aggressive Site Preparation and Hand Seeding (Includes Seed Mix) - $1,100.00
Spring 2026 Plug Planting (Includes Plant Material and Watering at Installation – $6.50/plug) - $8,807.50
Site Restoration (Disturbed Area) - $700.00
Additional Watering (Per Occurrence) - $900 x 3 Watering Visits - $2,700.00
2026 Maintenance Visits (2 visits - $770 per visit) - $1,540.00
PROJECT TOTAL: $21,157.50
*Pricing does not include prevailing wage rates or applicable taxes.
Key Personnel
Joe Schaffer – Vice President & Founder
Education: Iowa State Univ., BS in Wildlife Biology
As founder of MNL, Joe has extensive experience involving all aspects of the ecological restoration
industry. He has been involved with hundreds of restoration projects all over the upper Midwest and has
vast experience in consultation, design, project management, installation, and land management.
Dan Tix, PhD, CERP – Senior Restoration Ecologist
Education: Univ. of MN, Ph.D. in Plant Biology; Grinnell College, BA in General Science (Biology); Environmental Studies
Concentration; School for Field Studies, Center for Wildlife Management Studies, Kenya
Certifications: Certified Ecological Restoration Practitioner (CERP): Society for Ecological Restoration
Dan is a restoration ecologist with over 20 years of experience working on restoration projects in
Minnesota and in the upper Midwest. He prepares Vegetation Management Plans (VMP), completes site
assessments, and monitors vegetation establishment. Dan also completes botanical surveys, wetland
Page 50 of 262
6
delineations, plans for wetland mitigation, and will assist with permitting and environmental review. He
has spent his career providing technical assistance for projects affecting wetlands, vegetation, and other
natural resources and building respect with regulators and clients.
Josh Hanson - Ecologist, Senior Estimator
Education: Hamline University, BA Environmental Studies
Josh has been providing innovative solutions and value engineering since 2001. He has significant
experience in design, consultation, and project management and is committed to continually educating
and discovering new or improved methods to pursue MNL’s mission to Heal the Earth.
Jeff Renier – Construction Division Manager
Education: Univ. of MN, BS Natural Resources Mgmt.
Certifications/Additional Training: Wildland Firefighter Training (S-130/190)
Since joining MNL in 2008, Jeff’s leadership traits and customer-centric commitment sets the standard
our MNL partners come to expect. From large and complex projects to small, he ensures his teams are
well-versed in the deliverables and expectations of each project. Jeff believes in clear, constant
communication with both staff and customers to adapt to daily changes of industry projects. This
emphasis on communication leads to division resources being fully utilized in the best way possible.
Charlie Sawdey – Ecologist, Project Manager/Estimator
Education: Univ. of MN, MS Water Resources Science; St. John’s University, BS Political Science, Environmental Policy
Certifications/Additional Training: Certified Minnesota Wetland Professional #1362; Applied Geomorphology and Ecology
(MNDNR)
As an ecologist and hydrologist with 11 years of experience, Charlie is a passionate advocate for the
protection and restoration of endemic environments. He currently manages projects that specifically
relate to prairie and aquatic ecosystem rehabilitation and enhancement. Further, he has extensive
professional experience in both the private and public sectors, offering our clients a tailored service and
project management approach to natural resource related issues. Charlie currently serves on the Wright
County SWCD Water Task Force. His direct style of communication and steadfast desire to exceed our
clients’ expectations are fueled by MNL’s Mission to Heal the Earth.
Chelsea Bratvold - Project Manager/Estimator
Education: St. Cloud State Univ., BA Psychology & Minor in Business Mgmt.
Certifications/Additional Training: MDA Certified Pesticide Applicators License (Categories A & J); Erosion & Stormwater Construction
Site Manager Certification
Chelsea brings almost a decade of project management and coordination experience to MNL’s
construction division. She works closely with our site superintendents to ensure we deliver quality results
quickly and efficiently. Chelsea has a passion for working with people and helping to fulfill MNL’s mission
to Heal the Earth.
Page 51 of 262
7
Wes Olmschenk – Director of Products
Education: MBA from Drake University; St. John’s Univ., BA in Economics minor in Management, focus in Environmental Studies
Certifications/Additional Training: MN DNR Seed Mix Design
Wes has over 10 years’ experience in native seed design including wetland mitigation banks, solar sites,
pollinator focus areas, emergent wetlands, riverbank/riparian areas, upland prairies and more. He has an
expansive network of native seed producers and collectors leading to advanced knowledge of the market.
Chris Hoye - Manager of Vegetation Management
Education: St. John’s Univ., BA Environmental Studies
Certifications/Additional Training: Adv. Wildland Firefighter Training-Ignition Operations (S-234)
Chris has been a trusted resource in the restoration industry for over 16 years and has supervised MNL’s
Vegetation Management Division for more than ten years. He has extensive experience managing an
array of upper Midwest native plant communities. His years of field experience conducting selective
invasive species control on a wide range of landscapes and ecologically based land management planning
and practices provides the necessary understanding to oversee and provide solutions for all ecological
projects.
Nate Bauerly, Dan Ranweiler, Eric Stay, Aaron Widmark – Project Superintendents
Certifications: MDA Certified Pesticide Applicators License (Categories A & J)
Nate, Dan (Bud), Eric, and Aaron are well-trained heavy equipment operators with over sixty years’
combined experience. They have all performed a wide array of operational tasks on critical and sensitive
restoration projects at MNL.
Technical Field Staff
Certifications: pesticide and/or wildland burning certificates available upon request
Our staff of highly experienced field technicians offers a wide range of technical skills unique to the
industry.
Project Examples (partial list)
Photos and additional examples available upon request
Project Name: Lake George Shoreline Stabilizations
Location: Anoka County, MN
Owner: Anoka Conservation District
Completion Date: 2022
Contact: Jamie Schurbon; 763-434-2030; Jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org
Description: Six non-consecutive lakeshore stabilizations. Property one – stabilize approximately 105 LF
of shoreline with riprap and a vegetated buffer. Property two - stabilize approximately 50 LF of shoreline
Page 52 of 262
8
with a coir log and vegetated buffer. Property three - stabilize approximately 25 LF of shoreline with riprap
and install approximately 1400 SF of vegetated buffer. Property four – stabilize approximately 70 LF of
shoreline using minor regrading, erosion control blanket and native vegetation. Property five – stabilize
approximately 65 LF of shoreline with a coir log and vegetated buffer. Property six - stabilize
approximately 55 LF of shoreline using riprap and a vegetated buffer.
Project Name: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Location: Numerous sites in Hennepin County, Carver County, MN
Owner: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Completion Date: 2009-current
Contact: Josh Wolf; 952-641-4588; jwolf@minnehahacreek.org
Description: Conducted maintenance of multiple sites throughout the District in a wide array of settings
from expansive rural wetlands to high profile shorelines and stormwater BMP’s. Work included prescribed
burning, mowing (flail and rotary), weed/brush removal, herbicide applications (backpack, broadcast and
aerial), tree/shrub plantings, herbaceous plant installation, erosion control, prairie/wetland/woodland
seeding, as well as ongoing correspondences and annual reporting.
Project Name: Lake Howard Emergent NVM Planting
Location: Howard Lake, MN
Owner: Howard Lake Association and MNDNR
Completion Date: 2023
Contact: Cutis Forst, 320-543-3736, cforst3736@gmail.com
Description: Installation of 750 linear feet of emergent native vegetative mat along Lake Howard
shoreline.
Project Name: Buffalo Lake Shoreline Improvements
Location: Buffalo, MN
Owner: City of Buffalo
Completion Date: 2024
Contact: Adam Farrell; 612-209-5238; adam.farrell@ci.buffalo.mn.us
Description: 10,000SF of native seed installation and planting of approximately 1,800 native plugs.
Project Name: Smith Coffee Rain Gardens
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Owner: City of Eden Prairie
Completion Date: 2023
Contact: Stantec; Sarah Harding; 952-334-4838; sarah.harding@stantec.com
Page 53 of 262
9
Description: Repair and restoration of two rain gardens. Major components included debris, weeds, and
vegetation removal; erosion and sedimentation control BMPs; aggregate landing pad compaction and
installation; 1,342 new perennial and shrub plantings, mulching/erosion control blanket and edging.
Project Name: City of Cottage Grove
Location: Numerous sites in Washington County, MN
Owner: City of Cottage Grove
Completion Date: 2012-current
Contact: Zac Dockter; 651-458-2808; zdockter@cottagegrovemn.gov
Description: Conducted maintenance in multiple parks and natural areas throughout the city. Work
included site monitoring, herbicide applications, spot mowing, broadcast seeding, and prescribed
burning.
Project Name: City of Savage
Location: Various sites in Scott County, MN
Owner: City of Savage
Completion Date: 2020-current
Contact: Jesse Carlson; 952-882-2686; jcarlson@cityofsavage.com
Description: Conducted herbaceous invasive species control via hand weeding, backpack spraying,
broadcast spraying, UTV spraying, spot weed whipping and tractor mowing. Provided monitoring and
reporting at all locations.
Project Name: Wilmes Lake Alum Facility – Native Site Restoration
Location: Woodbury, MN
Owner: South Washington Watershed District
Completion Date: 2024
Contact: Kyle Axtell; 651-714-3718; kyle.axtell@woodburymn.gov
Description: 2.5 acres of native seeding with erosion control blanket and planting of 105 native trees.
Herbicide application was completed before no-till seeding of MNL native seed and tree installation. On-
going maintenance contract in place.
Project Name: Rogers Library Sustainability Improvements
Location: Rogers, MN
Owner: Hennepin County
Completion Date: 2024
Contact: Rod Vesterfelt; 612-814-3706; rod.vesterfelt@hennepin.us
Description: Rain garden construction, installation of over 200SY of native vegetative mat, and 176 native
plants. Contract included on-going watering and maintenance.
Page 54 of 262
10
Equipment
The following list of MNL’s inventory of specialty machinery, heavy duty equipment, vehicles, trailers,
power equipment, and implements demonstrates the commitment and investment MNL has made in
pursuing our mission to Heal the Earth.
Specialty Machinery: Implements/Attachments:
1 Barko 920 10 Excavating
1 Marooka Track Truck 13 Forestry
1 Pisten Bully Snow Cat 14 Misc.
2 Marsh Masters 21 Mowers
17 Seed Drill
Heavy Duty Equipment: 12 Snow Equipment
24 Ag. Tractors 10 Straw
1 Bulldozer 22 Tanks/Pumps/Sprayers
5 Excavators 25 Tillage
3 Forklifts
12 Skid Loaders Power Equipment:
2 Front End Loaders 27 Chainsaw
9 ATV’s 2 Cut-Off Saw
4 OHV’s 29 Weed Whip
12 UTV’s 6 Planting Augers
2 Snowmobiles 15 Leaf Blowers
7 Generators
Vehicles: 9 Roto Tiller
7 Dual Rear Wheels up to F550 1 Mower
10 Lg. Trucks-Multiple Rear Axles 3 Walk Behind Snow Blower
9 Lg. Trucks-Single Rear Axle 1 Sod Cutter
33 Single Rear Wheel 3 Laser Level
1 Trimble R10-2
Trailers:
7 Bumper Pull over 14.5k GVWR
11 Enclosed Trailers under 14.5k GVWR
11 Fifth Wheel or Gooseneck Hitch
10 Open Trailers under 14.5k GVWR
6 Specific Use
Page 55 of 262
Shorter grasses/sedges in this mix highlight a diverse list of wildflowers
for shoreline areas. Grass/Sedge height 2-4' with taller blooming forbs.
Scientific Name Common Name
% of
Mix
Seeds/
Sq Ft
PLS
lbs/ac
Bloom
Season
Grasses:Calamagrostis canadensis Blue-joint Grass 0.25 1.80 0.02
Elymus riparius Riverbank Wild Rye 2.50 0.19 0.18
Leersia oryzoides Rice Cutgrass 2.00 1.75 0.14
Poa palustris Fowl Bluegrass 3.75 12.53 0.26
Sedges/Rushes:Carex comosa Bottlebrush Sedge 2.50 1.93 0.18
Carex atherodes Hairy-leaved Lake Sedge 2.00 0.21 0.14
Carex hystericina Porcupine Sedge 6.00 4.63 0.42
Carex lupulina Common Hop Sedge 2.00 0.17 0.14
Carex pellita Woolly Sedge 1.50 1.08 0.11
Carex scoparia Pointed Broom Sedge 2.00 4.32 0.14
Carex stipata Awl-fruited Sedge 5.00 4.37 0.35
Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge 6.00 12.50 0.42
Schoenoplectus pungens Three-square Bulrush 2.50 0.77 0.18
Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Softstem Bulrush 3.00 3.32 0.21
Scirpus atrovirens Green Bulrush 0.70 8.28 0.05
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 0.20 8.74 0.01
Bolboschoenus fluviatilis River Bulrush 2.00 0.22 0.14
Forbs:Acorus americanus Sweet Flag 8.50 1.44 0.60 Summer
Alisma subcordatum American Water Plantain 2.00 3.09 0.14 Summer
Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo 5.00 0.35 0.35 Summer
Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone 0.75 0.15 0.05 Spring
Asclepias incarnata Rose Milkweed 7.00 0.86 0.49 Summer
Bidens cernua Nodding Beggarstick 0.70 0.63 0.05 Summer
Boltonia asteroides False Aster 0.75 3.09 0.05 Fall
Doellingeria umbellata Flat-topped Aster 0.50 0.86 0.04 Fall
Eutrochium maculatum Joe-pye Weed 1.20 3.72 0.08 Summer
Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset 0.50 3.21 0.04 Fall
Helenium autumnale Sneezeweed 1.65 5.52 0.12 Fall
Iris versicolor Northern Blueflag Iris 1.50 0.05 0.11 Spring
Liatris ligulistylis Meadow Blazing Star 1.50 0.39 0.11 Summer
Liatris pycnostachya Prairie Blazing Star 3.50 0.99 0.25 Summer
Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower 0.40 4.11 0.03 Summer
Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 0.40 5.14 0.03 Summer
Lythrum alatum Winged Loosestrife 0.50 12.15 0.04 Summer
Mimulus ringens Monkey Flower 0.25 14.78 0.02 Summer
Physostegia virginiana Obedient Plant 1.25 0.35 0.09 Summer
Pycnanthemum virginianum Mountain Mint 0.25 1.41 0.02 Summer
Rosa blanda Smooth Rose 1.00 0.07 0.07 Summer
Solidago riddellii Riddell's Goldenrod 0.55 1.32 0.04 Fall
Solidago uliginosa Bog Goldenrod 0.35 1.31 0.02 Fall
Sparganium eurycarpum Giant Burreed 8.00 0.10 0.56 Summer
Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2.50 4.24 0.18 Fall
Verbena hastata Blue Vervain 1.60 3.83 0.11 Summer
Vernonia fasciculata Ironweed 3.50 2.16 0.25 Summer
Veronicastrum virginicum Culver's Root 0.50 10.28 0.04 Summer
100.00 152.41 7.00
Seeds/sq ft:152.00
Grass Species:4
Sedges/Rushes:12
Forb Species:28
MNL Lakeshore Mix
Seed mixes are subject to change based on availability
Page 56 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
Page 57 of 2626.l
Page 58 of 262
Page 59 of 2626.m
Page 60 of 262
Page 61 of 262
Page 62 of 262
Page 63 of 262
Page 64 of 262
Page 65 of 262
Page 66 of 262
Page 67 of 262
Page 68 of 262
Page 69 of 262
Page 70 of 262
7.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Airport Relations Commission Update
ITEM TYPE: Presentation
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Informational only. The city council is encouraged to ask questions and provide feedback as
needed.
BACKGROUND:
The Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission is one of four advisory commissions for
the city. The Commission was established by city ordinance in 1993 and advises and makes
recommendations to the City Council on matters relating to airport noise and operations at
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The commission monitors proposed rules,
procedures, and programs that impact air noise within the city and makes recommendations
regarding strategies to mitigate the city's air noise exposure.
Current Commission members include: Gina Norling (chair), Arvind Sharma (vice chair), David
Sloan, William Dunn, Jim Neuharth, Jeff Hamiel, and Bruce Bobbitt.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 71 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
8.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance No. 603 - Amending Title 12: Zoning, to incorporate minor
updates relating to language, terminology, clarity, and to correct citations,
cross-references and conflicting provisions (Planning Case 2025-18)
ITEM TYPE: Ordinance
DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community
Development Manager
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Ordinance No. 603, Amending Title 12: Zoning to incorporate minor updates
BACKGROUND:
The proposed amendments to Title 12 – Zoning of the City Code consist of minor “clean-up”
revisions aimed at improving clarity, consistency, and usability. These amendments do not
alter the underlying intent or policy direction of the zoning ordinance. Instead, they correct
technical errors, update outdated references, reorganize content for readability, and clarify
provisions to support more effective implementation and enforcement.
These changes are part of the City’s regular maintenance of the zoning ordinance to ensure it
remains a clear, user-friendly, and legally consistent document for staff, applicants, and the
public. Staff will continue to monitor the zoning ordinance for amendments that may be made
in the future.
The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their regular meeting on September 25, 2025,
where a staff report was presented for Planning Commission review and public hearing. The
Commission discussed the location of B-1 General Business zoning across the City, and the
listed use for laboratory-type businesses. Through discussion, the Planning Commission
agreed that the draft ordinance should be revised to list that use as a Conditional Use, rather
than the Permitted Use proposed by staff.
A copy of the 09/25/25 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the unapproved
minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff recommended approval
of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning Commission affirmed the
staff recommendation, with one change to the draft ordinance relating to laboratory-type uses
in the Table of Uses. The Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend to the City
Page 72 of 262
Council approval of Ordinance No. 603. An updated redline has been included as an
attachment to this report.
This item has been published for a public hearing due to a procedural error during the
Planning Commission's public hearing on September 25. The City Attorney has advised that
noticing for an additional public hearing at the City Council would correct that error and
provide transparency to the public relating to this ordinance amendment adoption.
Due to the length of the proposed ordinance amendment, the City Council is also asked to
consider authorizing the publication of a Summary Ordinance, which requires 4/5ths of the
Council’s votes to succeed. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance
amendments within Ordinance No. 603, Amending Title 12: Zoning, and may make an
additional motion for the consideration of summary ordinance publication, as noted below:
(1) Adopt Ordinance No. 603, Amending Title 12: Zoning to incorporate minor updates related
to language, terminology, clarity, and to correct citations, cross-references and conflicting
provisions; and
(2) Authorize Publication of a Summary Ordinance of Ordinance No. 603
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Zoning Amendment Ord No. 603
2.Excerpt - Planning Commission Minutes 9-25-25
3.Planning Commission Staff Report 9-25-25
4. Summary Publication
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 73 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 603
AMENDING TITLE 12: ZONING, TO INCORPORATE MINOR UPDATES RELATING TO
LANGUAGE, TERMINOLOGY, CLARITY, AND TO CORRECT CITATIONS, CROSS-
REFERENCES AND CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights does ordain:
Section 1. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 2B: BASE ZONING DISTRICTS, Table
12-2B-3.1 R-1 Dimensional and Lot Standards as follows:
Lot Dimensions
A Lot Size (minimum) 15,000 square feet
B Lot Width (minimum) 100 feet
Principal Building Standards
C Front Yard Setback
Newly Created Lot (new plat) – Minimum
Existing Lot of Record (infill) - Minimum
30 feet
See Section [12-4A-3.D.2.]
Newly Created Lot (new plat) – Maximum
Existing Lot of Record (infill) - Maximum
40 feet
See Section [12-4A-3. D.2.]
D Side Yard Setback (minimum) 10 feet interior lot line
30 feet abutting a street
E Rear Yard Setback (minimum) 30 feet
Height (maximum) 25 feet
See Section [12-4A-7. C.]
Accessory Structure Standards
Private Garages
Number (maximum) One (1) detached or one (1) attached garage per
lot; see [Section 12-4A-8.D.2] for Exception for
Two Private Garages on a Lot.
Size (maximum)
If Attached Private Garage 1,200 square feet
1,201 - 1,500 square feet with CUP
Page 74 of 262
If Detached Private Garage 750 square feet
751 - 1,000 square feet with CUP
Size of Exception for Two Private Garages Up to 2,400 square feet based on lot size, see
Section [12-4A-8.D.2.]
Front Yard Setback (attached) Minimum Front Yard Setback of Principal
Building
F Front Yard Setback (detached) Behind Principal Building front facade
Side and Rear Yard Setbacks (minimum) Corner lots must meet Principal Building side
yard setback
H 144 to 2,000 square feet 10 feet
Over 2,000 square feet 15 feet
Height (Maximum) May not exceed height of Principal Building
144 to 2,000 square feet 15 feet, 1.5 stories
2,000 to 2,400 Square Feet 18 feet, 1.5 stories
I Setback from Principal Building 5 feet
Garage Doors
Width (maximum measured horizontally) 36 linear feet as viewed from the public right-
of-way
Height (maximum) 9 feet, up to 12 feet with Conditional Use Permit
Storage Building
Number (maximum) One (1); See [Section 12-4A-8.E.a.iii.] for
Exception for two Storage Buildings if Chicken
Coop/Run.
Size 144 square feet for one (1) Storage Building;
maximum of 225 square feet of combined
Storage Building and Chick Coop/Run.
Front Yard Setback (minimum) Behind Principal Building front facade
G Side and Rear Yard Setbacks (minimum) 5 feet
Height (maximum) 10 feet, 1 story
Accessory Structure (not meeting definition of Building)
Page 75 of 262
Setbacks Must meet all Accessory Building yard setbacks
Size No limit; must meet impervious surface
requirements for all combined improvements.
Other Standards
Impervious Surface Coverage (maximum) 35%, or up to 50% with approved Best
Management Practices (BMPs)
Section 2. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 3: ALLOWED USES, Article B:
PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES, Table 12-3B-1.1 as follows:
COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Research center and
laboratories
P
INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Warehousing and
distribution, not abutting
a Residential Base
Zoning District
CUP P 12-3B-5 B.6
ACCESSORY USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Off Street Parking CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
12-4A-7 B.6
12-4A-9
Section 3. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by removing and relocating Chapter 3:
ALLOWED USES, Article B: PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES, Chapter
5: INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITY USE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS,
Section B.1: Alternative Energy Systems in its entirety to- 12-4A-12 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
SYSTEMS.
Section 4. Section 4. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined
and removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 4: Wetland Requirements as follows:
A. Purpose. The requirements established herein are intended to support the regulations and
requirements established in Title 15:. Environmental Standards, Chapter 4: Wetland Conservation of the
Page 76 of 262
City Code and to comply with the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules. The City
will:
1. Reference the City’s wetland inventory and the National Wetland Inventory, to determine whether
a wetland may be present on a property that is the subject of a Land Use Development Application.
2. Coordinate wetland requirements with the Floodplain and Shoreland Protection regulations as
established in Title 15:. Environmental Standards.
B.2. Wetlands shall be located and identified according to the standards established in Title 15:.
Environmental Standards, Chapter 4: Wetland Conservation.
C.3. The lowest ground floor elevation must be a minimum of two feet (2') above the 100-year flood
elevation, or a minimum of three feet (3') above the Ordinary High Water Mark of public waters, as
regulated by Title 15:. Environmental Standards.
C.10. Any swimming pools, patios, decks, drive aisles, parking lots, etc., must be setback a minimum of
five feet (5') from any required buffer area, whichever is greater, unless otherwise permitted by Title 15:.
Environmental Standards.
D. Buffer Requirements.
1. The vegetation requirements for all required Buffer Areas are established in Title 15, Chapter 4:
Wetland Conservation, Section [15-4-6]. , Environmental Standards.
Section 5. Section 4. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined
and removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 5: Landscaping Requirements as follows:
4. As many existing native and non-invasive trees as is practicable must be preserved and must be
shown on the Site Plan. All Significant or Heritage Trees scheduled for removal must be identified on the
Site Plan. Removal of Significant or Heritage trees beyond the thresholds established in Title 15, Chapter
3: Urban Forest Preservation will require compliance with all requirements as defined and listed in
Sections 15-3-5 and 15-3-6. A Significant Tree is defined in Title 15. Environmental Standards.
Section 6. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 9: Off-Street Parking and Loading as follows:
(3) No Semitrailer, Truck Tractor, or a combination thereof, or any Custom Service Vehicle as defined
in Title X6, Section [6-1-2] of the City Code, or any truck in excess of 9,000 pounds gross vehicle weight
may be parked within a Residential Base Zoning District except for the purpose of loading, unloading, or
in the process of making a delivery.
Section 7. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
Page 77 of 262
DISTRICTS, Section 11: Signs as follows:
c. The maximum gross area of any surface of a pylon or monument sign in the [B-2] Zoning District is 80
square feet; and the maximum gross area of any surface in the B-2B-1 or I Zoning District is 100 square
feet.
Section 8. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article B STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
(RE, R-1, R-2 AND R-3), Section 2: SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS as follows:
e. Pitch of Roofs. With the exception of earth sheltered homes, all residential structures must have a
pitched roof of at least 3:12 and a maximum of 9:12 12:12.
(1) Exception. A two-story home may have a roof that is less than 3:12, or a flat roof.
(2) Secondary roofs, including but not limited to dormers, porches, awnings, cupolas, or other clearly
subordinate architectural elements, may exceed the maximum pitch provided they:
(A) Are clearly ornamental or accessory in nature;
(B) Do not result in an increase to the building height beyond the permitted maximum;
(C) Are not used to increase habitable floor area above what is otherwise permitted
Section 9. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 5: ADMINISTRATION AND
CONFORMANCE, Article B: COMMON STANDARDS OF LAND USE APPLICATIONS,
Section 8: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT as follows:
3. Number of Dwelling Units.
a. In a residential Planned Unit Development, the number of dwelling units proposed for the entire
site shall not exceed the total number permitted by the Base Zoning District(s) and the Comprehensive
Plan in which the land is located. If the residential Planned Unit Development is in more than one Base
Zoning District, the number of allowable dwelling units must be calculated separately for each portion of
the Planned Unit Development that is in a separate Zoning District and must then be combined to
determine the number of dwelling units allowable in the entire Planned Unit Development. The density of
individual uses in the MU-PUD District may be guided by the standard established by the Base Zoning
District for each use. The City Council shall have the authority to determine the allowed density based on
the quality and components of the Planned Unit Development. Said density may be lesser or greater than
that prescribed by the Base Zoning District(s) at the discretion of the City Council, but in all cases must
comply with the density ranges established in the Comprehensive Plan.
Section 10. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined to modify
Chapter 8: RULES AND DEFINTIONS, ARTICLE B: DEFINITIONS OF ZONING CHAPTERS
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 7 OF THIS TITLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Unless otherwise stated, it is the general plan for land use, transportation
and community facilities prepared and maintained by the Planning Commission and approved by the City
Page 78 of 262
Council. The comprehensive plan of the city and all policy statements, goals, standards, maps, charts and
explanatory materials thereto which guide the land use development of the city, as adopted by the city
council.
STREET, THOROUGHFARE (MAJORPRINCIPAL OR MINOR ARTERIAL) THOROUGHFARE: A
street which serves or is designed to serve heavy flows of traffic and which is used primarily as a route for
traffic between communities and/or other heavy traffic generating areas.
Section 11. Effective date.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately following adoption and publication according to law.
ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 2025 by the City Council for the City of Mendota Heights.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
___________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 79 of 262
APPROVED MINUTES
EXCERPT FROM APPROVED 9/25/25 PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
B) PLANNING CASE 2025-18
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS – ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that the City of Mendota Heights
approved the Zoning Code Update project in September 2024, which went into full force
and effect on January 1, 2025. Following the approval of this ordinance, staff began
implementing the new zoning ordinance provisions and began taking note of sections of
the ordinance that contained minor errors or conflicts, or specific citations that needed
clarification or minor “housekeeping” changes.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; one letter
was received related to residential building height recently, but not specifically related to
this ordinance amendment request and public hearing, and was included in the packet.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a
presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing
through the City’s website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions and
noted that this item would be a public hearing this evening.
Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the B-1 district.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that B-1 is general business while B-2
is neighborhood business.
Commissioner Johnson recalled that there was a lot of discussion related to the research facilities
and lab testing uses, and believed that those uses were meant to exist as conditional uses.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that the existing laboratory use is within
the B-1 district and believed that the specific location initially received a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP). She provided details on the areas currently designated as B-1.
Commissioner Johnson stated that she would tend to err on the side of requiring a CUP for that
use.
Chair Field and the other members of the Commission agreed that the change would make sense.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER UDELL, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE
TITLE 12 – ZONING AS OUTLINED IN SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 10 OF THE
Page 80 of 262
APPROVED MINUTES
REDLINED ORDINANCE, WITH THE CHANGE TO SECTION TWO, TO CHANGE TO
CUP.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 7, 2025,
meeting.
Page 81 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 603
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12: ZONING, TO INCORPORATE MINOR
UPDATES RELATING TO LANGUAGE, TERMINOLOGY, CLARITY, AND TO
CORRECT CITATIONS, CROSS-REFERENCES AND CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on November 5, 2025, Ordinance No. 603 was
adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No.
603, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the City Council
amends Title 12: Zoning, to incorporate minor updates relating to language, terminology, clarity,
and to correct citations, cross-references and conflicting provisions.
A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during
the City’s regular office hours at the office of the City Administrator/City Clerk or on the City’s
website.
PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council
of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, this 5th day of November 2025.
CITY COUNCIL OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
/S/Stephanie Levine, Mayor
Attest
/s/Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Planning Commission
Meeting Date: September 25, 2025
Agenda Item: Case No. 2025-18 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application of City of
Mendota Heights for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to incorporate minor
updates relating to language, terminology, clarity, and to correct citations,
cross-references and conflicting provisions.
Department: Community
Development
Contact: Sarah Madden,
Community Development
Manager
Introduction:
This item relates to amendments to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 12), as established following
the Zoning Code Update project. The City of Mendota Heights approved the Zoning Code
Update project in September 2024, which went into full force and effect on January 1, 2025.
Following the approval of this ordinance, staff began implementing the new zoning ordinance
provisions and began taking note of sections of the ordinance which contained minor errors or
conflicts, or specific citations which needed clarification or minor "housekeeping" changes.
A duly noticed public hearing was published in the Pioneer Press. No public comments have
been received for this proposed Ordinance Amendment, as of the date of this report. A letter
received prior to the City's public noticing has been included as an attachment to this report
which references residential building height, a standard which is proposed to be revised in this
update. This is discussed in great detail in the "Summary of Proposed Amendments" section
of this report.
Background:
The proposed amendments to Title 12 – Zoning of the City Code consist of minor “clean-up”
revisions aimed at improving clarity, consistency, and usability. These amendments do not
alter the underlying intent or policy direction of the zoning ordinance. Instead, they correct
technical errors, update outdated references, reorganize content for readability, and clarify
provisions to support more effective implementation and enforcement.
These changes are part of the City’s regular maintenance of the zoning ordinance to ensure it
remains a clear, user-friendly, and legally consistent document for staff, applicants, and the
public. Staff will continue to monitor the zoning ordinance for amendments that may be made
in the future.
A redlined version of the ordinance is included for reference, indicating all proposed edits.
Analysis:
Summary of Proposed Amendments
Section 1. Table 12-2B-3.1: R-1 Dimensional and Lot Standards
•Standardized language regarding impervious surface. The intent of this standard was to
Page 82 of 262
have a maximum impervious surface of 35%, without an option for BMP's. In the final
draft of the Zoning Code Update which was adopted, staff was directed to remove the
reference to BMP's. This was removed in other sections of code, but this specific
citation in this table was missed. This is a minor clean-up to remove the conflict
between different sections of the ordinance.
Section 2 – Table 12-3B-1.1: Permitted and Prohibited Uses
•Added or clarified entries related to research centers, laboratories, warehousing, and
off-street parking to address duplicates and correct citation references.
o Research laboratories were listed twice, with conflicting permissions of both
CUP and P listed depending on its location within the chart. These uses have
been consolidated under Industrial, Transportation, & Utility Uses to note that it
is permitted in B-1.
o Warehousing and distribution was modified during the Planning Commission's
final review of the ordinance to allow as a CUP, but the use-specific citation for
warehouse uses was not included in the chart. It is added here to direct
applicants to the additional requirements.
o Off-Street Parking was listed as a Conditional Use in all zoning districts, and the
use-specific citation directed to an area of code which does not exist. Off-Street
Parking (parking lots, driveways, garages, etc.) are intended to be an Accessory
Permit Use in all zoning districts, subject to individual use standards. The citation
and listed use are both proposed to be corrected.
Section 3 – Relocation of Alternative Energy Systems Regulations
•Moved Alternative Energy Systems from Chapter 3, Section 5.B.1 to a newly created
Section 12-4A-12 for as these standards apply to all zoning districts, and not just
industrial districts.
o This section lists standards for Solar Energy Systems which apply to all zoning
districts; staff is suggesting it be relocated out of the Industrial-specific section to
provide clarity.
Section 4 – Section 12-4A-4 Wetland Requirements
•Clarified Citations which reference Title 15: Environmental Standards
Section 5 - Section 12-4A-5: Landscaping Requirements
•Clarified standards and citation to reference Title 15, Chapter 3: Urban Forest
Preservation ordinance requirements
Section 6 - Section 12-4A-11: Off Street Parking and Loading
•Corrected Title 6 Citation
Section 7 – Section 12-4A-11: Signs
Page 83 of 262
•Corrected listed Zoning District from B-2 to B-1
o This is a typographical error proposed to be corrected.
Section 8 – Section 12-4B-2: Roof Pitch Standards for Residential Structures
•Set maximum roof pitch for residential buildings to 12:12.
•Introduced exceptions for subordinate architectural roof elements such as dormers and
porches.
o This topic was discussed at the City Council Work Session on 9/16/25. City
Council was provided information by staff and by local developers and home-
builders that the maximum pitch standard was not suitable for modern
construction standards. The developers also expressed a need for clarity on
primary roof structures versus secondary or ornamental roof structures as they
do not contribute to overall height. Through discussion, staff was directed to
include this increase in the maximum pitch and the clarity to roof structures as
part of the upcoming housekeeping amendments.
Section 9 – Section 12-5B-8: Planned Unit Development
•Clarified that it is a City Council's discretionary action in adjusting PUD densities
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
o This sentence was in direct conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and with
earlier language in this same Chapter regarding density increases or decreases.
Staff has reviewed this item with the City Attorney and the recommendation is to
remove this sentence for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan language
relating to the use of Planned Unit Developments to increase or lower density
beyond the underlying zoning district.
Section 10 – Chapter 8: Definitions
•Revised the definition of "Comprehensive Plan" for clarity and updated language in the
definition of a "thoroughfare".
o This street type is no longer the official term used, and is not reflective of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. Future definition modifications are anticipated as the
City continues to review the Subdivision Ordinance for code updates.
Alternatives:
The proposed ordinance amendment is to Title 12-Zoning, which requires the Planning
Commission to provide a review under a public hearing process and provide a
recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission may consider one of the
three following actions:
1. Recommend approval of the draft Ordinance No. 596 which amends certain sections of
Zoning Code Title 12 – Zoning, as presented herein; or
2. Recommend approval or denial of the requested zoning code amendments in whole or in
part; or with added/revised language and standards deemed necessary by the commission;
or
Page 84 of 262
3. Table the amendment request, and direct city staff to provide additional information for
further consideration by the Planning Commission and present this information at the next
scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed
amendments to City Code Title 12 – Zoning as outlined in Sections 1 through 10 of the
redlined [draft] ordinance attached to this report.
These amendments are intended to improve the clarity, internal consistency, and usability of
the zoning ordinance without changing the underlying regulatory intent or development
standards. The proposed edits are administrative in nature and serve to correct technical
errors, update references, clarify existing language, and improve the structure and readability
of various sections of the code.
Staff finds that the proposed changes are consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and support the ongoing maintenance of a clear and enforceable zoning
ordinance.
Attachments:
1.Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Ord 603 - Redline 9/19/25
2.Letter of Concern from Housing First Minnesota
Page 85 of 262
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 603
AMENDING TITLE 12: ZONING, TO INCORPORATE MINOR UPDATES RELATING TO
LANGUAGE, TERMINOLOGY, CLARITY, AND TO CORRECT CITATIONS, CROSS-
REFERENCES AND CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights does ordain:
Section 1. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 2B: BASE ZONING DISTRICTS, Table
12-2B-3.1 R-1 Dimensional and Lot Standards as follows:
Lot Dimensions
A Lot Size (minimum) 15,000 square feet
B Lot Width (minimum) 100 feet
Principal Building Standards
C Front Yard Setback
Newly Created Lot (new plat) – Minimum
Existing Lot of Record (infill) - Minimum
30 feet
See Section [12-4A-3.D.2.]
Newly Created Lot (new plat) – Maximum
Existing Lot of Record (infill) - Maximum
40 feet
See Section [12-4A-3. D.2.]
D Side Yard Setback (minimum) 10 feet interior lot line
30 feet abutting a street
E Rear Yard Setback (minimum) 30 feet
Height (maximum) 25 feet
See Section [12-4A-7. C.]
Accessory Structure Standards
Private Garages
Number (maximum) One (1) detached or one (1) attached garage per
lot; see [Section 12-4A-8.D.2] for Exception for
Two Private Garages on a Lot.
Size (maximum)
If Attached Private Garage 1,200 square feet
1,201 - 1,500 square feet with CUP
Page 86 of 262
If Detached Private Garage 750 square feet
751 - 1,000 square feet with CUP
Size of Exception for Two Private Garages Up to 2,400 square feet based on lot size, see
Section [12-4A-8.D.2.]
Front Yard Setback (attached) Minimum Front Yard Setback of Principal
Building
F Front Yard Setback (detached) Behind Principal Building front facade
Side and Rear Yard Setbacks (minimum) Corner lots must meet Principal Building side
yard setback
H 144 to 2,000 square feet 10 feet
Over 2,000 square feet 15 feet
Height (Maximum) May not exceed height of Principal Building
144 to 2,000 square feet 15 feet, 1.5 stories
2,000 to 2,400 Square Feet 18 feet, 1.5 stories
I Setback from Principal Building 5 feet
Garage Doors
Width (maximum measured horizontally) 36 linear feet as viewed from the public right-
of-way
Height (maximum) 9 feet, up to 12 feet with Conditional Use Permit
Storage Building
Number (maximum) One (1); See [Section 12-4A-8.E.a.iii.] for
Exception for two Storage Buildings if Chicken
Coop/Run.
Size 144 square feet for one (1) Storage Building;
maximum of 225 square feet of combined
Storage Building and Chick Coop/Run.
Front Yard Setback (minimum) Behind Principal Building front facade
G Side and Rear Yard Setbacks (minimum) 5 feet
Height (maximum) 10 feet, 1 story
Accessory Structure (not meeting definition of Building)
Page 87 of 262
Setbacks Must meet all Accessory Building yard setbacks
Size No limit; must meet impervious surface
requirements for all combined improvements.
Other Standards
Impervious Surface Coverage (maximum) 35%, or up to 50% with approved Best
Management Practices (BMPs)
Section 2. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 3: ALLOWED USES, Article B:
PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES, Table 12-3B-1.1 as follows:
COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Research center and
laboratories
P
INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Scientific research,
investigation, testing and
experimentation,
including laboratories
CUP CUP
P
P
Warehousing and
distribution, not abutting
a Residential Base
Zoning District
CUP P 12-3B-5 B.6
ACCESSORY USES
Land Use RE R-1 R-2 R-3 MU B-1 B-2 I Use Specific Section
Off Street Parking CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
CUP
AP
12-4A-7 B.6
12-4A-9
Section 3. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by removing and relocating Chapter 3:
ALLOWED USES, Article B: PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED USES, Chapter
5: INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITY USE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS,
Section B.1: Alternative Energy Systems in its entirety to- 12-4A-12 ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
SYSTEMS.
Section 4. Section 4. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined
and removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
Page 88 of 262
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 4: Wetland Requirements as follows:
A. Purpose. The requirements established herein are intended to support the regulations and
requirements established in Title 15:. Environmental Standards, Chapter 4: Wetland Conservation of the
City Code and to comply with the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules. The City
will:
1. Reference the City’s wetland inventory and the National Wetland Inventory, to determine whether
a wetland may be present on a property that is the subject of a Land Use Development Application.
2. Coordinate wetland requirements with the Floodplain and Shoreland Protection regulations as
established in Title 15:. Environmental Standards.
B.2. Wetlands shall be located and identified according to the standards established in Title 15:.
Environmental Standards, Chapter 4: Wetland Conservation.
C.3. The lowest ground floor elevation must be a minimum of two feet (2') above the 100-year flood
elevation, or a minimum of three feet (3') above the Ordinary High Water Mark of public waters, as
regulated by Title 15:. Environmental Standards.
C.10. Any swimming pools, patios, decks, drive aisles, parking lots, etc., must be setback a minimum of
five feet (5') from any required buffer area, whichever is greater, unless otherwise permitted by Title 15:.
Environmental Standards.
D. Buffer Requirements.
1. The vegetation requirements for all required Buffer Areas are established in Title 15, Chapter 4:
Wetland Conservation, Section [15-4-6]. , Environmental Standards.
Section 5. Section 4. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined
and removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 5: Landscaping Requirements as follows:
4. As many existing native and non-invasive trees as is practicable must be preserved and must be
shown on the Site Plan. All Significant or Heritage Trees scheduled for removal must be identified on the
Site Plan. Removal of Significant or Heritage trees beyond the thresholds established in Title 15, Chapter
3: Urban Forest Preservation will require compliance with all requirements as defined and listed in
Sections 15-3-5 and 15-3-6. A Significant Tree is defined in Title 15. Environmental Standards.
Section 6. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 9: Off-Street Parking and Loading as follows:
(3) No Semitrailer, Truck Tractor, or a combination thereof, or any Custom Service Vehicle as defined
in Title X6, Section [6-1-2] of the City Code, or any truck in excess of 9,000 pounds gross vehicle weight
may be parked within a Residential Base Zoning District except for the purpose of loading, unloading, or
Page 89 of 262
in the process of making a delivery.
Section 7. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article A: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING
DISTRICTS, Section 11: Signs as follows:
c. The maximum gross area of any surface of a pylon or monument sign in the [B-2] Zoning District is 80
square feet; and the maximum gross area of any surface in the B-2B-1 or I Zoning District is 100 square
feet.
Section 8. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 4: BUILDING, CHARACTER, AND
DESIGN STANDARDS, Article B STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
(RE, R-1, R-2 AND R-3), Section 2: SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS as follows:
e. Pitch of Roofs. With the exception of earth sheltered homes, all residential structures must have a
pitched roof of at least 3:12 and a maximum of 9:12 12:12.
(1) Exception. A two-story home may have a roof that is less than 3:12, or a flat roof.
(2) Secondary roofs, including but not limited to dormers, porches, awnings, cupolas, or other clearly
subordinate architectural elements, may exceed the maximum pitch provided they:
(A) Are clearly ornamental or accessory in nature;
(B) Do not result in an increase to the building height beyond the permitted maximum;
(C) Are not used to increase habitable floor area above what is otherwise permitted
Section 9. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined and
removing the strikethrough language to modify Chapter 5: ADMINISTRATION AND
CONFORMANCE, Article B: COMMON STANDARDS OF LAND USE APPLICATIONS,
Section 8: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT as follows:
3. Number of Dwelling Units.
a. In a residential Planned Unit Development, the number of dwelling units proposed for the entire
site shall not exceed the total number permitted by the Base Zoning District(s) and the Comprehensive
Plan in which the land is located. If the residential Planned Unit Development is in more than one Base
Zoning District, the number of allowable dwelling units must be calculated separately for each portion of
the Planned Unit Development that is in a separate Zoning District and must then be combined to
determine the number of dwelling units allowable in the entire Planned Unit Development. The density of
individual uses in the MU-PUD District may be guided by the standard established by the Base Zoning
District for each use. The City Council shall have the authority to determine the allowed density based on
the quality and components of the Planned Unit Development. Said density may be lesser or greater than
that prescribed by the Base Zoning District(s) at the discretion of the City Council, but in all cases must
comply with the density ranges established in the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 90 of 262
Section 10. City Code Title 12 – ZONING is hereby amended by adding the underlined to modify
Chapter 8: RULES AND DEFINTIONS, ARTICLE B: DEFINITIONS OF ZONING CHAPTERS
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 7 OF THIS TITLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Unless otherwise stated, it is the general plan for land use, transportation
and community facilities prepared and maintained by the Planning Commission and approved by the City
Council. The comprehensive plan of the city and all policy statements, goals, standards, maps, charts and
explanatory materials thereto which guide the land use development of the city, as adopted by the city
council.
STREET, THOROUGHFARE (MAJORPRINCIPAL OR MINOR ARTERIAL) THOROUGHFARE: A
street which serves or is designed to serve heavy flows of traffic and which is used primarily as a route for
traffic between communities and/or other heavy traffic generating areas.
Section 11. Effective date.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately following adoption and publication according to law.
ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2025 by the City Council for the City of Mendota Heights.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
___________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 91 of 262
City of Mendota Heights
Mayor Levine and City Council; Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Concerns Over Stricter Local Building Requirements
Dear Mayor Levine and Councilmembers,
On behalf of Housing First Minnesota, I am writing to express strong concerns regarding
provisions in the Mendota Heights City Code that appear to establish building
requirements stricter than those set forth in the Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC).
The MSBC exists to provide a uniform, statewide standard for construction practices—
supporting predictability for builders, protecting homeowners, and advancing housing
affordability. When municipalities impose additional requirements—such as:
•§12-4B-2(e): Requiring all residential structures to have pitched roofs between 3:12
and 9:12, despite MSBC provisions allowing lower slopes depending on materials;
•§12-4A-7: Setting height restrictions for inflll development that function more like
construction mandates than zoning standards; the Minnesota State Legislature has
raised concerns with the practice of “buying approvals” through the discretionary
review system in recent years.
they create questionable legal confiicts with state authority and add unnecessary cost and
complexity.
Our concerns are direct and urgent:
1.Housing Affordability: Extra construction mandates drive up housing costs without
improving safety or durability. In a time of housing shortage, these local rules restrict
design fiexibility and make new homes less attainable.
2.Questionable Legal Confiict: While cities hold zoning authority, provisions that blur
the line between aesthetics and construction standards risk confiicting with state
building authority.
Page 92 of 262
3.Loss of Uniformity: The MSBC is designed to be consistent across Minnesota. Local
deviations undermine that goal and create confusion for builders and homeowners.
Housing First Minnesota urges the City of Mendota Heights to review these ordinances and
align them more closely with the spirit of statewide uniformity. Without such action, these
rules will continue to create barriers to affordability and invite avoidable disputes.
Our industry is committed to providing safe, affordable, high-quality homes across
Minnesota. We ask the City to work with us to ensure its ordinances do not go beyond their
intended scope, especially in ways that add unnecessary cost and restrict housing options.
Sincerely,
Mark Foster
Vice President of Legislative & Political Affairs
Housing First Minnesota
Page 93 of 262
9.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: City of Mendota Heights Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition
Plan
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and
Recreation/Assistant Public
Works Director
Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City
Engineer
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires public entities, including cities, counties,
and other local governments, to ensure that their programs, services, and activities are
accessible to individuals with disabilities. To comply with this mandate, cities with fifty (50) or
more employees must conduct a self-evaluation of their current facilities and develop an ADA
Transition Plan. This plan is essential for guaranteeing equal access to public infrastructure and
services, including trails, sidewalks, curb ramps, government facilities, parks and various
programs.
The City hired Stonebrooke Engineering to conduct an evaluation and develop an ADA
Transition Plan. The plan consists of the following elements: self-evaluation condition
assessment, review of existing policies and practices, establishment of an ADA Coordinator,
improvement schedule, details on public engagement efforts, and the development of a
grievance procedure.
The plan is a living document and will require periodic review and update. Updates to the plan
are expected as enhancements are made, timetables adjust, and other changes arise, as
indicated in the plan. A re-evaluation of the plan is mandated at least every five years.
Britt Berner, Project Manager and Accessibility Specialist, from Stonebrooke Engineering will
present the City's proposed ADA Transition Plan.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Page 94 of 262
The 2025 budget included $35,000 from the General Fund to cover the costs associated with
the project. The base proposal from Stonebrooke Engineering totaled $25,879 and an
additional $3,179 was utilized for the parks and facilities assessment. The completion of the
project has come in under the budgeted amount.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Mendota Heights Transition Plan
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive
and Responsive Government
Page 95 of 262
OCTOBER 2025
ADA Transition Plan
Page 96 of 262
1
Table of Contents
Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Transition Plan Need and Purpose ............................................................................................................ 3
ADA and Its Relationship to Other Laws ................................................................................................... 3
Agency Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 3
Self-Evaluation Condition Assessment .......................................................................................................... 4
Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 4
Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 4
Right-of-Way Results ................................................................................................................................. 6
Policies and Practices .................................................................................................................................... 6
Practices .................................................................................................................................................... 6
Policy ......................................................................................................................................................... 7
Policy Review ............................................................................................................................................. 7
ADA Coordinator ......................................................................................................................................... 12
Improvement Schedule ............................................................................................................................... 12
Priority Areas ........................................................................................................................................... 12
External Agency Coordination ................................................................................................................. 12
Schedule Goals ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Planning Level Costs (2025 Dollars) ........................................................................................................ 13
Public Outreach ........................................................................................................................................... 15
Requirements .......................................................................................................................................... 15
Engagement Summary ............................................................................................................................ 15
Grievance Procedure ................................................................................................................................... 18
Monitor The Progress ................................................................................................................................. 18
Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 19
Appendix A – Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................. 19
Appendix B – Self-Evaluation Maps ......................................................................................................... 21
Appendix C – Park and Facility Evaluations ............................................................................................. 44
Appendix D – Agency ADA Design Standards and Procedures ............................................................... 77
Appendix E – ADA Coordinator ............................................................................................................... 80
Page 97 of 262
2
Appendix F – ADA Public Notice ............................................................................................................. 81
Appendix G – Public Outreach Materials ................................................................................................ 82
Appendix H – Grievance Procedure ........................................................................................................ 97
Appendix I – Complaint Form ................................................................................................................. 99
Appendix J - Notice of Rights ................................................................................................................ 103
Page 98 of 262
3
Introduction
Transition Plan Need and Purpose
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting
discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. ADA consists of five titles outlining protections
in the following areas:
1. Employment
2. State and local government services
3. Public accommodations
4. Telecommunications
5. Miscellaneous provisions
Appendix A of this document includes a glossary of ADA terms that may be used in this document. Title II
of ADA pertains to the programs, activities, and services public entities provide. As providers of
transportation routes (sidewalks, ramps, crosswalks, etc.) and programs, Mendota Heights must comply
with this section of the Act as it specifically applies to public service agencies. Title II of ADA provides that,
“…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation
in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to
discrimination by any such entity.” [42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130]
As required by Title II of the ADA, 28 CFR. Part 35 Sec. 35.105 and Sec. 35.150, Mendota Heights has
conducted self-evaluations of facilities within public rights-of-way and developed a Transition Plan
detailing how the agency will ensure all facilities are accessible to all individuals.
ADA and Its Relationship to Other Laws
Title II of ADA is companion legislation to two previous federal statutes and regulations: the Architectural
Barriers Acts of 1968 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 is a Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered, or
leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to
ensure access to the built environment.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a Federal law that protects qualified individuals from
discrimination based on their disability. The law's nondiscrimination requirements apply to employers and
organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. Title II of the ADA
extended this coverage to all state and local government entities, regardless of whether they receive
federal funding.
Agency Requirements
Under Title II, Mendota Heights must meet these general requirements:
• Must operate their programs so that, when viewed in their entirety, they are accessible to and
usable by individuals with disabilities [28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150].
Page 99 of 262
4
• May not refuse to allow a person with a disability to participate in a service, program, or activity
simply because the person has a disability [28 C.F.R. Sec.35.130 (a)].
• Must make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures that deny equal access
to individuals with disabilities unless a fundamental alteration in the program would result [28
C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b) (7)].
• May not provide services or benefits to individuals with disabilities through programs that are
separate or different unless the separate or different measures are necessary to ensure that
benefits and services are equally effective [28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b)(iv) & (d)].
• Must take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants, and
members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others [28 C.F.R.
Sec. 35.160(a)].
• Must designate at least one responsible employee to coordinate ADA compliance [28 C.F.R Sec.
35.107(a)]. This person is often referred to as the “ADA Coordinator.” The public entity must
provide the ADA coordinator’s name, office address, and telephone number to all interested
individuals [28C.F.R Sec. 35.107(a)].
• Must provide notice of ADA requirements. All public entities, regardless of size, must provide
information about the rights and protections of Title II to applicants, participants, beneficiaries,
employees, and other interested persons [28 C.F.R Sec. 35.106]. The notice must include the
identification of the employee serving as the ADA coordinator and must provide this information
on an ongoing basis [28 C.F.R Sec. 104.8(a)].
• Must establish a grievance procedure. Public entities must adopt and publish grievance
procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints [28 C.F.R Sec. 35.107(b)].
This requirement provides for a timely resolution of all problems or conflicts related to ADA
compliance before they escalate to litigation and/or the federal complaint process.
Self-Evaluation Condition Assessment
Overview
Under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and 28 CFR 35.105, Mendota Heights must self-
evaluate its current infrastructure, policies, practices, and programs.
The goal of self-evaluation is to verify that the City is providing accessibility and not adversely affecting the
full participation of individuals with disabilities in implementing its policies and practices.
The evaluation includes pedestrian ramps, sidewalks, traffic control signals, public buildings, and public
parks within the City's jurisdiction. This transition plan sets out any barriers to accessibility identified in
the self-evaluation and the remedy for each identified barrier.
Summary
The self-evaluation field data inventory was completed in the summer of 2025. During this time, project
staff inventoried components of the public environment using the latest GPS technology to collect field
data for pedestrian infrastructure features and site visits at all public buildings and parks. Data was
imported into Esri ArcGIS for analysis, reporting, and mapping as part of the Transition Plan. This data is
Page 100 of 262
5
accurate as of 2025. ADA compliance criteria for the data inventory were based on MnDOT’s standards
and included a thorough quantitative and qualitative assessment of the following:
Pedestrian Ramps: All pedestrian ramps were inventoried and evaluated for compliance. Data collected
for each pedestrian ramp includes condition, dome type, landing size, ramp type, slope, detectable
warning system, and other required compliance information. Maintenance issues include unlevel ground
surfaces, gaps, steep cross slope, cracking, standing water, vegetation, spalling, and others.
Ramps received one of the following condition ratings based on the above criteria:
• Uniform slopes, no noticeable cracks, no vertical discontinuities, no spalling, joints intact
• Uniform slopes, some cracks, vertical discontinuities less than 1/4”, no spalling, joints intact
• Gutter slope beyond flare flows back towards pedestrian ramp at < 1.5%, some large cracks and
minor spalling, noticeable vertical discontinuities, joints beginning to deteriorate
• Gutter slope beyond flare flows back towards pedestrian ramp at > 1.5%, many cracks, multi-
directional, excessive spalling, excessive vertical discontinuities, joints badly deteriorated, > 1/2”
vertical discontinuities
To achieve ADA-compliance, a pedestrian ramp must exhibit the following:
• Running slope is less than or equal to 8.33%
• Cross slope is less than or equal to 2%
• Presence of a landing area greater than or equal to 4-feet by 4-feet and less than or equal to 2%
cross slopes in all directions.
• An ADA-compliant detectable warning is present (i.e., truncated domes)
Pedestrian ramps that do not exhibit the above criteria are not compliant with the ADA and are candidates
for future reconstruction projects. The timeline for modifying each of these pedestrian ramps will depend
on its priority ranking, correlation to planned projects, reasonable accommodation requests, and available
funding. Compliant and non-compliant pedestrian ramp locations are identified in the appendix.
Sidewalks and Trails: Sidewalk and trail maintenance issues include vertical discontinuity, gaps, steep cross
slopes, cracking, standing water, vegetation, and spalling. Barriers to accessibility include items obstructing
the Pedestrian Access Route (PAR), including hydrants, lighting/traffic signal poles, power poles,
manholes/handholes, gate valves, and locations with a narrowed PCR/PAR.
Sidewalks and trails received one of the following condition ratings based on the above criteria:
• Sidewalk is smooth with no vertical discontinuities
• Sidewalk has vertical discontinuities less than 1/2 inch, and the surface is still passable
• Sidewalk has vertical discontinuities more than 1/2 inch
• Sidewalk is crumbling, has many cracks, and is unpassable for wheelchairs in many spots
To achieve ADA-compliance, a sidewalk or trail must exhibit the following:
• Slope is less than 8.33%
• Cross slope is less than or equal to 2%
Page 101 of 262
6
Sidewalk and trail segments with condition ratings that do not meet the above criteria are not compliant
with the ADA and are candidates for future reconstruction projects.
Crosswalks: Crosswalks were evaluated for their general condition. Marked crosswalk locations were
assessed for marking visibility issues and general pavement condition.
Traffic Signals: Available pedestrian signals were inventoried for Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS)
availability, walk signal availability or countdown timers, and push button location. Traffic signals were
categorized as APS and Non-APS locations. Signals without APS were determined to be non-compliant.
The data collection template was built in an Esri ArcGIS geodatabase format to allow for the flexibility
needed to use various software solutions, including Collector for ArcGIS.
Public Parks and Buildings: Public parks and buildings were evaluated at various facilities to understand
accessibility and overall condition. This included playgrounds, the fishing pier, the skate park, courts and
fields, restrooms, picnic areas, and other amenities. Each feature was reviewed to identify barriers to
access, opportunities for improvement and to help prioritize upgrades that will make these community
spaces safer, more inclusive, and welcoming for all users.
Right-of-Way Results
Below are the results of the percentage compliance for the elements within the City's right-of-way.
Table 1 Mendota Heights Self-Evaluation Results
Infrastructure Type Total Number Number Compliant % Compliant
Pedestrian Ramps 488 258 53%
Sidewalks, Trails, and
Crossings
864 435 50%
APS Signals 50 36 72%
City Parks 16 *See Appendix B N/A
City Buildings 4 *See Appendix B N/A
Policies and Practices
Under Title II of the ADA and 28 C.F.R Sec 35.105, Mendota Heights must self-evaluate policies, practices,
and programs. Self-evaluation aims to verify that, in implementing the policies and practices, agencies
provide accessibility and do not adversely affect the full participation of individuals with disabilities. The
self-evaluation identifies policies and practices that affect accessibility and examines agency
implementation of these policies. The self-evaluation examines the condition of the agency’s PCR/PARs
and identifies any existing infrastructure needs. Accessibility barriers identified in self-evaluations are
provided in respective agency Transition Plans in subsequent parts of this document.
Practices
Since federal adoption of the ADA, the City of Mendota Heights has striven to provide accessible
pedestrian features in various capacities as part of its construction practices. As additional information
was made available about providing accessible pedestrian features, the City has updated its procedures
Page 102 of 262
7
and standards to accommodate these methods. Recently, more standardized design and construction
methods have evolved. The City has improved its understanding of available options and ability to assess
the feasibility of implementing accessibility improvements through training on accessible features.
Policy
The City is committed to providing equal access to all its public programs, services, and activities for
anyone in the public with disabilities. City staff will continue to inspect, inventory, and plan any required
improvements to facilities located in their public rights-of-way to ensure compliance with the ADA. The
goal is to continue to provide accessible pedestrian design features as part of all construction projects,
City-owned infrastructure, and programming. The City has established ADA design standards and
procedures, which will be kept up to date with nationwide and local best management practices. The City
will coordinate with other agencies to ensure that all new or altered facilities within City jurisdiction are
ADA-compliant to the maximum extent feasible. The City will consider and respond to all accessibility
improvement requests. Requests should be sent to the ADA Coordinator. All accessibility improvements
will be reviewed by the City and scheduled consistent with construction priorities.
Policy Review
Title 5 Police Regulations
Chapter 5.6.2 Skateboards: Operation Prohibitions and Restrictions
In Title 5, the City Code defines where skateboards can operate, stating:
It shall be unlawful for any person:
A.To operate any skateboard on public property; or
B.To operate any skateboard upon a roadway; or
C. To operate any skateboard on private property of another within the city without the prior written
permission of the owner or person in lawful possession of such property. (1981 Code 915 § 2)
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
The regulation of skateboard use on public sidewalks is relevant to the ADA Transition Plan because
sidewalks serve as key pedestrian access routes for individuals with disabilities. Unregulated skateboard
activity can create safety hazards, physical barriers, and surface damage, which may limit accessibility and
violate ADA requirements. Clear policies that balance recreational use with the need to maintain safe,
unobstructed pedestrian pathways are essential to ensuring compliance with the ADA and protecting
access for all sidewalk users.
The definitions accompanying this policy include defining a “roadway” as meant for vehicular traffic and
“public property” as government-owned property, excluding roadways. So, according to this policy,
skateboards cannot be operated on sidewalks because they are publicly owned, and on roadways because
they are meant for vehicular traffic. Skateboarders are encouraged to utilize the Rogers Lake Skate Park.
If the City intends to ensure that skateboards do not inhabit sidewalks, keep this wording the same. If not,
the City may even want to add language to exclude sidewalks, specifically. If the intent is not to have
Page 103 of 262
8
skateboards in publicly owned parking lots or other locations, add an exception for sidewalks. The policy
could list inappropriate behaviors leading to skateboarders being asked to leave or get fined, such as
reckless behavior, failing to yield, etc. Here is some sample language:
Skateboarding is permitted on sidewalks in Mendota Heights, provided it is done safely and respectfully.
To ensure sidewalks remain accessible and safe for all users, the following behaviors are prohibited and
may result in fines or a ban from sidewalk use:
- Reckless riding or excessive speed that endangers pedestrians
- Performing tricks or stunts in crowded or narrow areas
- Failing to yield to pedestrians or ignoring verbal warnings to pass safely
- Damaging public or private property while skateboarding
- Using skateboards on sidewalks in designated business districts where prohibited
Violations may result in a warning, fines, or a temporary or permanent ban from sidewalk skateboarding
privileges.
Title 6 Motor Vehicles and Traffic
Chapter 6.2.1 Parking Prohibited in Certain Places
This chapter outlines where an individual cannot park. The places relevant to accessible travel are listed
below.
No person shall stop, stand, or park a motor vehicle, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other
traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following
places: (Ord. 513, 9-5-2017)
A. On or blocking a sidewalk, bikeway or pedestrian way or blocking a driveway, bikeway or pedestrian
way entrance.
…
E. On a crosswalk.
F. Within twenty feet (20') of a crosswalk at an intersection.
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
This city code is relevant to an ADA Transition Plan because it helps ensure sidewalks, crosswalks, and
pedestrian ways remain clear and accessible. By prohibiting parking that blocks these routes, the code
supports safe, unobstructed access for people with disabilities. The Transition Plan will reference this as
an existing measure that aligns with ADA goals and recommend stronger enforcement, signage, or public
education to improve accessibility.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. Keep this policy as written.
Page 104 of 262
9
Chapter 6.2.3 Parking for Handicapped Persons
This chapter confirms the need for accessible parking that is only utilized by those who fulfill the following
requirements:
A. Parking Restrictions: No person shall park a motor vehicle in a parking space designated and reserved
for the physically handicapped, on either private or public property, unless:
1. That person is physically handicapped in a manner rendering it difficult and burdensome for such
person to walk, or such person is operating the vehicle under the direction of such a physically handicapped
person; and
2. The vehicle visibly bears or contains the certificate or insignia issued to physically handicapped
persons by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 169.345,
subdivision 2.
B. Signs Posted: Notice of such designation of handicapped parking spaces shall be given by the posting
of appropriate signs.
C. Prima Facie Proof: In any prosecution charging a violation of this section, proof of the identity of the
registered owner of the particular vehicle described in the citation or complaint at the time of the violation
shall create a prima facie presumption that the individual was the person who parked such vehicle at the
point where the violation occurred.
D. Violations: A violation of this section shall constitute a petty misdemeanor. Vehicles in violation may
be removed, impounded, and kept in custody under the direction of the Chief of Police. (Ord. 219, 11-5-
1985)
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
This code should be included in the ADA Transition Plan because it protects access to designated accessible
parking spaces, which are essential for people with disabilities. It outlines who can use these spaces,
requires proper signage, and establishes enforcement procedures, including penalties and vehicle
removal. Including it in the plan shows that the city already supports ADA parking requirements and
highlights the need for continued enforcement, maintenance of signage, and monitoring of accessible
parking availability across public and private sites.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. Keep this policy as written.
Chapter 6.5.1 Operation of Bicycles
Similar to the skateboarding requirements above, this section outlines where bikes can operate. Unlike
skateboards, bikes are allowed to operate on sidewalks with some restrictions.
D. Areas Of Riding:
…
3. Sidewalks:
a. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within a business district.
Page 105 of 262
10
b. Whenever any person is riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk, such person shall yield the right of way
to any pedestrian and shall give audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian.
I. Parking Regulations: No person shall park a bicycle upon a street other than against the curb, or upon a
sidewalk in any manner that might obstruct pedestrian traffic. (1981 Code 1202 § 1; amd. 2003 Code)
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
These policies support ADA accessibility by restricting bicycle riding on sidewalks in business districts and
requiring cyclists to yield to pedestrians elsewhere. They also prohibit bicycle parking that blocks
pedestrian paths, helping ensure sidewalks remain clear and accessible for all users.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. It is recommended to keep this policy as
written.
Title 8 Public Ways and Property
Chapter 8.1.2 Removal of Snow, Ice, Dirt, and Rubbish from Sidewalks
This section outlines who is responsible for clearing sidewalks.
A.….1 . The owner and the occupant of any property adjacent to a public sidewalk shall use due diligence
to keep such walk safe for pedestrians. No such owner or occupant shall allow snow, ice, dirt or rubbish to
remain on the walk longer than twenty four (24) hours after its deposit thereon. (1981 Code 701 § 2)
B.Removal By City; Records Kept: The city public works superintendent or other officials or employees of
the city designated by the city council may remove from all public sidewalks within the city all snow, ice,
dirt, and rubbish as soon as possible beginning twenty four (24) hours after any such matter has been
deposited thereon or after the snow has ceased to fall. Such employees or officials shall keep a record
showing the cost of such removal adjacent to each separate lot and parcel and shall deliver such
information to the city clerk. (1981 Code 701 § 2; amd. 2003 Code)
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
This ordinance supports ADA accessibility by requiring property owners to clear snow, ice, dirt, and rubbish
from adjacent sidewalks within 24 hours. This ensures safe and passable routes for all pedestrians,
including those with disabilities. It also allows the city to step in and clear obstructions if necessary, helping
maintain accessible public walkways year-round.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. Keep this policy as written.
Chapter 8.1.3 Repair of Sidewalks
This section outlines who is responsible for maintaining sidewalks.
A. Responsibility Of Owner To Repair: The owner of any property within the city abutting public sidewalks
shall keep the sidewalk in repair and safe for pedestrians.
B. Repair Specifications: Repairs shall be made in accordance with standard specifications approved by
the council and on file in the office of the city clerk. (1981 Code 701 § 3)
C. Inspections; Notice To Repair: It shall be the duty of the city public works superintendent or other
officials designated by the city council to make such inspections as are necessary to determine that public
Page 106 of 262
11
sidewalks within the city are kept in repair and safe for pedestrians. If they find that any sidewalk abutting
on private property is unsafe and in need of repair, they shall cause a notice to be served, by certified or
registered mail or by personal service, upon the recorded owner of the property and the occupant if the
owner does not reside within the city or cannot be found therein, ordering such owner to have the sidewalk
repaired and made safe within thirty (30) days, and stating that if the owner fails to do so, the city will
have such work done, and that the expense thereof must be paid by the owner, and that if unpaid, the
entire cost thereof will be made a special assessment against the property concerned. (1981 Code 701 § 3;
amd. 2003 Code)
D. Repair By City; Record Of Costs: If the sidewalk is not repaired within ninety (90) days after receipt of
the notice, the city council shall by resolution order the sidewalk repaired and made safe for pedestrians,
all in accordance with law. A record of the total cost of the repair attributable to each lot or parcel of
property shall be maintained by the city clerk. (1981 Code 701 § 3)
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
This ordinance supports ADA compliance by requiring property owners to maintain and repair adjacent
sidewalks to ensure they are safe and accessible for pedestrians. It establishes a clear inspection, notice,
and enforcement process, allowing the city to make necessary repairs if owners do not act. This helps
prevent barriers to accessibility and ensures a consistent standard for pedestrian infrastructure.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. Keep this policy as written.
Title 12 Zoning
Chapter 12-4A-3 Yards and Open Spaces
In the zoning regulations, specifically under Title 12 – Zoning, the code acknowledges the presence of
accessibility ramps:
"Uncovered and/or open terraces, steps, porches or decks, accessibility ramps, stoops or similar structures,
which do not extend above the height of the ground..."
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
This provision indicates that accessibility ramps are considered in zoning regulations, which can be
pertinent when planning for ADA compliance in public infrastructure.
No barriers to accessibility were identified in this plan/policy. Keep this policy as written.
Website Accessibility
Section 508 and WCAG
According to the City website, Mendota Heights works to comply with Section 508 and WCAG 2.0 A and
AA, referring to website accessibility standards. The City provides contact information for a staff directory
on contacting someone if the content interferes with their ability to access information.
Policy Understanding and Recommended Revisions
These are important policies to ensure access to digital information.
Instead of having a link lead to the staff directory, consider a link to a specific email or administration page
so that the public knows who to reach out to.
Page 107 of 262
12
ADA Coordinator
Per 28 C.F.R Sec. 35.107(a), the City of Mendota Heights has identified an ADA Title II Coordinator to
oversee the city’s policies and procedures. Contact information for this individual is located in Appendix E.
Improvement Schedule
Priority Areas
A tiered system categorizing the level of compliance for pedestrian ramps, sidewalks, and signal systems
was developed to assist the City with prioritizing limited funds to improve its pedestrian facilities.
High Priority – Tier 1
These locations are NON-COMPLIANT and in locations and roadway segments serving facilities. Below is a
standard list of possible public facility locations. This list is not specific to Mendota Heights.
•Government facilities (city, county, state);
•Department of Motor Vehicles offices and License bureaus;
•Public libraries;
•Public and private primary and secondary schools (within a one-quarter mile radius from the
school property);
•Hospitals, health clinics, and health centers (public and private);
•Public housing and homeless shelters, including senior facilities and rehabilitation facilities;
•Colleges, universities, and technical schools;
•Transportation hubs (includes bus lines and transit stations);
•Parks
For these high-priority locations applicable to Mendota Heights and roadway segments within the City,
field collection staff measured various detailed accessibility and pedestrian data, as described in Section
III.
Medium Priority – Tier 2
Field collection staff measured a detailed variety of accessibility and pedestrian data for these medium-
priority locations and roadway segments. These locations are non-compliant, but they are not near the
locations identified in Tier 1 above.
Lower Priority – Tier 3
•Other areas not classified as High or Medium. These locations are generally compliant.
Mendota Heights can use the priority ranking outlined above to create a plan and schedule for integrating
ADA compliance projects into future street projects.
External Agency Coordination
Dakota County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) are responsible for some
pedestrian facilities within the City of Mendota Heights' jurisdiction. There are currently no transit facilities
Page 108 of 262
13
on the city's right-of-way. The City will coordinate with Dakota County and MnDOT to facilitate the
elimination of accessibility barriers along their routes and/or associated with their services.
Schedule Goals
The City of Mendota Heights will utilize two methods for upgrading pedestrian facilities to the current ADA
standards. The scheduled street and utility improvement projects are the first and most comprehensive of
the two methods. All pedestrian facilities impacted by these projects will be upgraded to current ADA
accessibility standards. The second method, although rare, is the standalone sidewalk and ADA
accessibility improvement project. These projects will be incorporated into the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) on a case-by-case basis as determined by City staff.
The City anticipates allocating approximately $100,000-250,000 per year toward ADA improvements. This
figure represents a rough estimate of annual funds the City anticipates allocating to pedestrian
infrastructure through dedicated funds and street projects identified in the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). For example, the City may directly or indirectly dedicate $40,000 - $50,000 through the annual
budget for pedestrian infrastructure, while another $160,000 or $170,000 may be allocated through street
projects identified in the CIP and/or the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
The City of Mendota Heights is committed to improving accessibility throughout the community. Based on
prioritization criteria and available funding, infrastructure improvements have been categorized into short-
term (2025–2034), mid-term (2035–2044), and long-term (2045 and beyond) phases. The City recognizes
that accessibility needs and infrastructure conditions evolve. Therefore, this plan is intended to be a living
document that will be updated periodically as new inventories are completed and as infrastructure is
evaluated and improved.
The City anticipates that many high-priority improvements will be addressed in the first 10 years, with
continued progress in subsequent decades. However, it is essential to note that infrastructure may require
re-evaluation and reinvestment over time to maintain compliance.
Implementation will be coordinated with the City’s annual budget, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and
long-term maintenance efforts. As part of ongoing planning, the City will conduct regular reviews of the
ADA Transition Plan to assess progress, update priorities, and ensure alignment with current standards
and community needs.
Planning Level Costs (2025 Dollars)
The following planning-level cost estimates are intended to guide budgeting for accessibility
improvements in Mendota Heights. Estimates are presented as ranges that reflect typical construction
costs, with adjustments for factors such as demolition, grading, utilities, and urban retrofit conditions.
Actual costs will vary depending on site-specific conditions.
Pedestrian Ramps
•Standard pedestrian ramp replacement (single ramp): $5,000 – $10,000
o Includes demolition, grading, detectable warnings, adjacent sidewalk tie-ins, and traffic
control.
Page 109 of 262
14
•Corner with multiple ramps (2–4): $15,000 – $35,000
o This range is consistent with typical construction experience and considered reasonable.
Sidewalks (Concrete)
•New sidewalk (5–6 feet wide): $50 – $100 per linear foot ($250,000 – $500,000 per mile)
o Lower costs are typical in greenfield areas, while higher costs apply in urban retrofits
where tie-ins to driveways, buildings, pedestrian ramps, or outwalks are required.
•Replacement sidewalk: $40 – $80 per linear foot
o Replacement is often cheaper when limited to panel replacements, but costs increase
when utilities or driveways are impacted.
Trails (Bituminous)
•New trails (8 feet wide): $40 – $90 per linear foot ($210,000 – $480,000 per mile)
o Lower costs are typical in greenfield corridors or along open rights-of-way, while higher
costs occur in retrofit situations that require grading, retaining walls, utility adjustments,
or drainage improvements.
•Replacement trail: $30 – $80 per linear foot
o Replacement is often less expensive when limited to mill and overlay or partial trail
removal, but costs rise if the underlying base aggregate needs replacement or adjacent
features such as fences, utilities, or drainage structures are impacted.
Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS)
•APS at a typical crossing: $25,000 – $40,000
o Represents costs for APS signal system revisions at a single crossing.
•Full intersection retrofit with APS on all legs: $200,000 – $300,000
o A full retrofit involves controller upgrades, mast arms, ADA pushbutton placement, and
pedestrian ramp tie-ins.
Other Considerations
•Mobilization and traffic control
o Typically add 10–20% to construction costs.
•Design and administration
o 15–30% depending on scope
o If the percentage covers design and construction administration/inspection, 20–30% is
appropriate.
Page 110 of 262
15
o If it covers design only, a narrower range of 15–20% is more accurate.
•Contingency
o 20–30% is recommended for planning-level budgeting.
Summary
These ranges provide a framework for estimating accessibility improvements in Mendota Heights. They
align with MnDOT average bid prices and recent project experience, with higher ranges applied for
complex APS retrofits. These estimates should be revisited during preliminary design to refine costs based
on site-specific conditions.
Public Outreach
Requirements
Under the 28 C.F.R Sec. 35.105 (b), “a public entity shall provide an opportunity to interested persons,
including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities, to
participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments.”
Additionally, the 28 C.F.R Sec. 35.105 (c) states, “a public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall, for
at least three years following completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for
public inspection:
1.A list of the interested persons consulted;
2.A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
3.A description of any modifications made.
Engagement Summary
The City of Mendota Heights invited residents, employees, and visitors to share feedback through an
online and paper survey as well as an interactive map. The purpose was to better understand community
needs related to accessibility, walking, biking, and mobility throughout the city. The City also held an Open
House for public comment with the release of the Draft Plan.
The survey and map were available online, with printed versions available at City Hall, and promoted
through the City’s website and communication channels.
Who Mendota Heights Heard From
•Survey Responses: 77 survey respondents
•Mapped Comments: 12 map comments received
•Open House Attendance: One City Councilmember attended and participated in an informal
discussion with project staff. No formal public comments were received.
Page 111 of 262
16
Demographic Information
•Age:
o Most respondents were 55 years old or older. See Figure 1 below.
•Disability:
o About 29 percent (22 people) identified as a person with a disability, and 65 percent (49
people) did not.
•Relationship to Mendota Heights:
o The vast majority were residents (73 people), with smaller numbers of visitors (2), City
employees (2), and business owners (1).
Figure 1: Age Distribution of Survey Respondents
Key Takeaways
Common themes identified through both the survey and interactive map include:
•Accessibility varies across facilities: Sidewalks, trails, and pedestrian ramps were most often rated
“Somewhat Accessible” or “Very Accessible,” though several people noted challenges.
•Policy awareness: More than half of respondents (29 people) were unfamiliar with the City’s
accessibility policies. Several participants suggested the City review and expand biking,
skateboarding, and winter maintenance policies.
•Mobility and safety concerns: Respondents highlighted sidewalk/trail gaps, unsafe intersections,
and the need for safer crossings.
•Winter maintenance is critical: Snow and ice on sidewalks and trails were cited as significant
barriers to accessibility.
Survey Highlights
Accessibility of Facilities
•Sidewalks: About 48 percent (27 people) rated sidewalks as very accessible, while four
respondents felt they were not accessible.
•Shared-use trails: About 43 percent (24 people) rated trails as very accessible, while three people
said they were not accessible.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Under 18
19-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Page 112 of 262
17
•Pedestrian ramps: About 56 percent (32 people) rated ramps as very accessible, though four
people found them inaccessible.
•Programming and Recreation: Six respondents stated that programming was inaccessible, and
five respondents ranked parks and recreational areas as inaccessible.
Policy Opinions
•Skateboarding on sidewalks: Skateboarding is currently not allowed on sidewalks. Sixty percent
of respondents supported the current policy, fifteen percent wanted improvements, and eleven
percent thought it should not be regulated.
•Bicycling on sidewalks: Biking is currently not allowed in business districts. Currently, bicyclists
should yield to pedestrians and give an audible signal when passing. Bikes cannot be parked on
sidewalks. Sixty-two percent supported the current policy, 34 percent wanted changes to the
policy, and two percent felt it should not be regulated.
Open-Ended Input
•Other policies: Thirteen respondents offered ideas, including expanded trail maintenance,
improved winter policies, and stricter enforcement around accessible parking.
•Additional comments: Seventeen respondents provided detailed feedback, focusing on sidewalk
gaps, crossing safety, and consistency in snow removal.
Responses from the online survey provided valuable insight into the public’s lived experiences and
priorities related to accessibility. This feedback was reviewed alongside technical data and used to
prioritize improvements throughout the city. In particular, survey responses helped identify areas of
concern not previously captured in existing inventories and shaped the development of short-, mid-, and
long-term improvement strategies.
Online Map Feedback
Through the interactive mapping tool, participants shared location-specific comments.
•Number of mapped comments: 12 comments
•Most common themes:
o Missing sidewalks and trail connections
o Dangerous or high-speed intersections
o Lack of pedestrian crossings and signals
o Winter maintenance hot spots
These mapped locations were compared with the sidewalk and trail networks present within the City to
help prioritize future accessibility improvements.
Page 113 of 262
18
Summary
The online survey and interactive map provided valuable insights about accessibility and mobility from
Mendota Heights residents and stakeholders. While some felt sidewalks, trails, and pedestrian ramps are
generally accessible, participants pointed to gaps in connections, unsafe crossings, and challenges with
winter maintenance. Awareness of City policies was limited, and respondents expressed interest in more
straightforward, updated biking and sidewalk use guidance. The mapped feedback highlighted areas for
improvement, helping the City prioritize future investments. The engagement emphasized strong
community support for enhancing safety, connectivity, and year-round accessibility.
Grievance Procedure
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, each agency is required to publish its responsibilities regarding
the ADA. If users of the City of Mendota Heights facilities and services believe the City has not provided
reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance.
In accordance with 28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.107(b), the City has developed a grievance procedure to prompt and
equitably resolve the public's complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances. This draft of the
public notice and the City of Mendota Heights’ grievance procedure are outlined in the Appendix H.
Monitor The Progress
This document will be updated to reflect the City of Mendota Heights’ approach to complying with the
ADA and providing accessible pedestrian infrastructure. The appendices will be updated periodically to
account for improvements, while the main body will be updated within three to five years, with a future
update schedule to be developed at that time. With each main body update, a public comment period will
be established to continue the public outreach.
A parks and facilities review was conducted in 2025. Infrastructure updated after this time may not be
reflected in this Plan update.
Page 114 of 262
19
Appendices
Appendix A – Glossary of Terms
ADA Transition Plan: A plan that identifies accessibility needs, the process to fully integrate accessibility
improvements into the Highway Improvement Plan, and ensures all transportation facilities, services,
programs, and activities are accessible to all individuals.
Accessible: A facility that provides access to people with disabilities using the design requirements of the
ADA.
Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS): A device communicating information about the WALK phase in audible
and vibrotactile formats.
Alteration: A change to a facility in the public right-of-way that affects or could affect access, circulation,
or use. An alteration must not decrease or have the effect of reducing the accessibility of a facility or an
accessible connection to an adjacent building or site.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act is civil rights legislation passed
in 1990 and effective July 1992. The ADA sets design guidelines for accessibility to public facilities, including
sidewalks and trails, by individuals with disabilities.
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG): contains scoping and technical
requirements for accessibility to buildings and public facilities by individuals with disabilities under the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.
Architectural Barriers Act (ABA): Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered, or leased with
Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access
to the built environment.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): The CIP includes an annual capital budget and a five-year plan for funding
construction of City infrastructure projects.
Condition Rating for Pedestrian Ramps
Tier 1: Several elements are non-compliant – Poor
Tier 2: substantially compliant and working well – Fair
Tier 3: largely or fully compliant – Good
Condition Rating for Signalized Intersections
Tier 1: Two or more signal elements for the intersection are non-compliant – Poor
Tier 2: No more than one signal element for the intersection is non-compliant – Fair
Tier 3: All signal elements for the intersection are largely or fully compliant – Good
Detectable Warning: A surface feature of truncated domes built in or applied to the walking surface to
indicate an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way.
Page 115 of 262
20
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): This branch of the US Department of Transportation administers
the federal Highway Program, which provides financial assistance to states to construct and improve
highways, urban and rural roads, and bridges. See Federal Highway Administration
Pedestrian Access Route (PAR): A continuous and unobstructed walkway within a pedestrian circulation
path that provides accessibility.
Pedestrian Circulation Route (PCR): A prepared exterior or interior passage provided for pedestrian travel.
PROWAG: An acronym for the Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way issued in 2005 by the U. S.
Access Board. This guidance addresses roadway design practices, slope, and terrain related to pedestrian
access to walkways and streets, including crosswalks, pedestrian ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian
signals, parking, and other components of public rights-of-way.
Right of Way: A general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for
the network of streets, sidewalks, and trails creating public pedestrian access within a public entity’s
jurisdictional limits.
Section 504: The section of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination by any program or activity
conducted by the federal government.
Uniform Accessibility Standards (UFAS): Accessibility standards that all federal agencies are required to
meet, which include scoping and technical specifications.
United States Access Board: An independent federal agency that develops and maintains design criteria
for buildings and other improvements, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and electronic
and information technology. It also enforces accessibility standards that cover federally funded facilities.
United States Department of Justice (DOJ): The United States Department of Justice (often referred to as
the Justice Department or DOJ) is the United States federal executive department responsible for enforcing
the law and administering justice.
Page 116 of 262
21
Appendix B – Self-Evaluation Maps
Page 117 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
East
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 118 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northeast Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 119 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northwest Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 120 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southeast Corner
Legend
N
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 121 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southwest Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
N
Page 122 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
East
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 123 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northeast Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 124 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northwest Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 125 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southeast Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 126 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southwest Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Compliance 2025
No
Yes
Page 127 of 262
LegendMendota Heights BoundaryPedestrian SignalsCompliance 2025NoYesMendota Heights ADA Transition PlanNPage 128 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
East
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 129 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northeast Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 130 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northwest Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 131 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southeast Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 132 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southwest Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Curb Ramps
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 2 - Fair
Tier 3 - Good
Page 133 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
East
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 134 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northeast Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 135 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Northwest Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 136 of 262
NMendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southeast Corner
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 137 of 262
Mendota Heights
ADA Transition Plan
Southwest Corner
N
Legend
City Trails and Public Sidewalks
Mendota Heights Boundary
Sidewalks
Tier 1 - Poor
Tier 3 - Good
Tier 2 - Fair
Page 138 of 262
Mendota Heights ADA Transition PlanNLegendMendota Heights BoundaryPedestrian SignalsTier 1 - PoorTier 2 - FairTier 3 - GoodPage 139 of 262
44
Appendix C – Park and Facility Evaluations
Page 140 of 262
CIVIC CENTER
PARK /
MERTENSOTTO
FIELD
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
• Ball Field
• Batting Cages
• Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
The field shares a parking lot with the City Hall building. There are no accessible
spaces near the park/field.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Stripe an accessible parking space and aisle near the ballfield along the
accessible pathway. Make sure to provide compliant signage. See MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4 for requirements. Ensure that the
access aisle has a “No Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
A sewer cap near the ADA-accessible restroom runs
parallel to the traffic direction, and the cap gaps are
too large. The pathway to the restroom from the
trail requires stairs.
Picnic Area
There are tables provided; however, none are
accessible.
Sports Field
Although there is a concrete path to the field from
the parking lot, the pathway from the trail requires
stairs.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Consider adding a ramp to the restroom/field. ADA 206.2.1.
• Add picnic tables that are ADA-compliant. ADA 4.32.2
• Replace the sewer cap with one that does not have large gaps. ADA 403.3
TOILET ROOM
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
Figure 1 Route requiring stairs
at Civic Center Park
Figure 2 Accessible Restroom
at Civic Center Park. Sewer Cap
with large spacing.
Page 141 of 262
COPPERFIELD
PONDS
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
650 Huber Drive
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Walking Path
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
No parking lots provided. No accessible spaces are provided at the on-street
parking.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide at least one designated parking space near the park trail. For
requirements, see MN Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Several locations along the pathway are too steep or have too steep a cross-
slope
Accessibility Recommendations
•Regrading the sidewalk is likely unnecessary, but an 8 percent slope could
be considered a ramp. Providing a handrail and ensuring other accessible
components could make this route compliant. MN Accessibility Code 504
Page 142 of 262
FRIENDLY HILLS
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
2360 Pueblo Lane
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
• Parking Lot
• Playground
• Ball Field
• Picnic Shelters
• Portable Toilet
• Basketball Court
• Hockey Rink (Winter)
• Pickleball Courts
(Summer)
• Warming House
• Overlay Soccer (Fall)
• Tennis Courts
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
The parking lot has three designated parking spaces. The northern lot has an
access aisle with no parking designated. The central lot does have a parking
space allocated, but the access aisle is too narrow. It also does not connect
to an accessible route. The southern lot does not have a sign to indicate no
parking in the access aisle. It also does not connect to an accessible route.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Restripe the central lot access aisle section for an 8-foot access aisle.
Provide compliant signage. See MN Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4
for requirements. Ensure that the access aisle has a “No Parking” sign at
the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Tree roots create uneven surfaces in some
places. The picnic pavilions have no accessible
route and a steep grass path.
Picnic Area
The picnic area did not have accessible seating.
Basketball Court/Ball Field
Although there is no concrete path to the field or court, pathways to the ball
field are through grass and are generally flat. At the time of the evaluation,
the weather was good. Grass pathways can become unstable and slippery in
adverse weather.
Figure 1 Southern Parking Lot at Friendly Hills
Figure 2 Picnic Tables at Friendly
Hills Park
Figure 3 Access Route to Baseball Field from the Basketball Court at Friendly Hills Park
Page 143 of 262
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the ball field and to the upper
playground area. MN Accessibility Code 302
• Add picnic tables that are ADA-compliant. ADA 4.32.2
TOILET ROOM
Accessible Portable Toilets
There are accessible portable toilets near the warming house and the tennis
courts.
Accessibility Recommendations
• There are accessible restrooms; however, the walk from the playground/
baseball field area is far. Consider adding a third restroom on the
southern side of the park.
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The swings are on an inaccessible tiered surface. The addition of the rubber
surface is great for accessibility; however, it is only in one portion of the
playground.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add an accessible route to the swings that does not involve stairs and
follows accessible route requirements. ADA 1008.2.1
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 4 Restroom at Friendly Hills Park
Figure 5 Tiered Swing Area at Friendly Hills Park
Page 144 of 262
FRIENDLY MARSH
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
2191 Apache Street
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Trails
•Natural Area
PARKING
Parking
There is no designated parking. Only street parking is available.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider adding an accessible parking sign at the cul-de-sac so that there
is a designated parking space. ADA 502
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Several sidewalk segments on the trail’s northern end (towards South Plaza
Drive) are non-compliant because of a steep slope of 7.8 percent. The curb
ramp leading to the trail does not have truncated domes. There was utility work
at the time of inspection.
Accessibility Recommendations
•The slope of the sidewalks is within the range of being considered
a “ramp,” so adding a compliant handrail would put the sidewalk into
compliance without leveling the ground. ADA 405.8
•Ensure that truncated domes are present after utility work is completed.
ADA 406.8
Figure 1 Cul-de-sac at Friendly Marsh Park
Page 145 of 262
HAGSTROM-KING
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
555 Mendota Heights Rd.
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Playground
•Ball Field
•Picnic Tables
•Basketball Court
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
The parking lot has a designated parking
space, is flat, and accommodates
accessible needs. Parking spaces and
aisles are marked. However, the ball field
has no paved path, so the best parking
would be on the street. There is no
designated ADA parking on the street.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide on-street designated
parking near the ball field.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The curb ramp at Watersedge Terrace does not
have a level landing. The sidewalk running to
Watersedge Terrace has a running slope of 8
percent.
Picnic Area
There are several picnic tables provided, but
none are accessible.
Sport Field/Court
Although there is no concrete path to the
basketball court or ball field, pathways are
through grass and are generally flat. At the time
of the evaluation, the weather was good. Grass
pathways can become unstable and slippery in
adverse weather.
Figure 1 Compliant Parking Lot at
Hagstrom-King Park
Figure 2 Picnic Table at Hagstrom-
King Park
Figure 3 Basketball Court at Hagstrom-King
Page 146 of 262
Accessibility Recommendations
•Regrading the sidewalk is likely unnecessary, but the 8 percent slope
could be considered a ramp. Providing a handrail and ensuring
other accessible components could make this route compliant. MN
Accessibility Code 504
•Add an accessible picnic table. Ensure a clear path to the accessible
portion. ADA 4.32.2
•Regrade the sidewalk near Watersedge Terrace to have a level landing
at the top of the curb ramp. ADA 406.7
•Consider adding a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the ball field and
court. MN Accessibility Code 302
TOILET ROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is one accessible restroom, an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements, many
accessible components, and a great variety of types of play.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 4 Restroom at Hagstrom-King Park
Figure 5 Playground at Hagstrom-King Park
Page 147 of 262
IVY HILLS
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
645 Butler Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Tennis Courts
•Ball Field
•Basketball Court
•Portable Toilet
•Playground
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
The parking lot is flat and has designated spaces, and it accommodates
accessible needs. Parking spaces and aisles are marked.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The walkways are clear, stable, and slip-
resistant.
Picnic Area
There are tables provided; however,
none are accessible.
Ball Field / Courts
Although there is no concrete path to the field, the pathway to the ball field is
through grass, which is generally flat. At the time of the evaluation, the weather
was good. Grass pathways can become unstable and slippery in adverse
weather. The tennis courts are compliant, and there is an accessible concrete
path to the new basketball court
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider adding a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the ball field. MN
Accessibility Code 302
•Add picnic tables that are ADA-compliant. ADA 4.32.2
TOILET ROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number
of accessible elements, many accessible
components, and a great variety of types of
play.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Although Engineered Wood Fiber is
an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the
wood shifts when used. Ensure this
playground is inspected regularly, raked
out, and maintained to meet accessible
requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 1 Picnic Area at Ivy Hills
Figure 2 Accessible Restroom at Ivy
Hills
Figure 3 Accessible Diggers at Ivy Hills
Page 148 of 262
KENSINGTON
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
2627 Concord Way
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
• Parking Lot
• Playground
• Soccer Fields
• Picnic Shelters
• Concession Stand
• Restrooms
• Drinking Fountain
• Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
The parking lot has designated parking spaces, is flat, and accommodates
accessible needs. Parking spaces and aisles are marked. However, the access
aisle for the spaces adjacent to the soccer fields is too narrow.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Restripe the soccer field access aisle section for an 8-foot access aisle.
Provide compliant signage. See MN Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4
for requirements. Ensure that the access aisle has a “No Parking” sign at
the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Pine trees adjacent to the walkway at the
playground create an uneven walking surface.
Picnic Area
Although an accessible table is provided at
one of the shelters, only three percent of the
seating is accessible (five percent is required).
The concession stand window is too high.
Soccer Fields
Although there is no concrete path to the fields,
pathways to sports fields are through grass and
generally flat. At the time of the evaluation,
weather was good. Grass pathways can become
unstable and slippery in adverse weather.
Figure 1 Compliant Parking Lot at Kensington Park
Figure 2 Access Route at Kensington
Park
Figure 3 Picnic Table at Kensington Park
Page 149 of 262
Drinking Fountains
The drinking fountain itself is accessible; however, it is within the pedestrian
travel path and not detectable by a cane.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Regularly sweep the sidewalk surface during the pinecone shedding
season to stabilize the route. Consider adding a stable, slip-resistant
pathway to the soccer fields. MN Accessibility Code 302
•Add an accessible picnic table to the other picnic shelter. Ensure a clear
path to the accessible portion. ADA 4.32.2
•Add a temporary concession surface that is 36 inches from the floor.
Consider an accessible window when it is reconstructed. ADA 904.3.2
•If possible, recess the drinking fountain or provide bollards so a cane
can detect the drinking fountain. Ensure that bollards comply with
accessible route requirements. ADA 307.2
TOILET ROOM
Indoor Single-User Toilets
There are two indoor single-user toilet rooms. The restroom signs are not
tactile and do not have Braille. The doors close too quickly and are heavy (18
pounds). The toilet paper is mounted too far from the front of the toilet (12
inches).
Accessible Portable Toilet
The accessible portable toilet is fully compliant.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide signage with tactile letters, braille, and contrasting letters
mounted at a compliant height. ADA 703.1
•Ensure that the closer on the door closes no quicker than 5 seconds.
ADA 404.2.7.1. Although there is no required exterior force for a door
in the MN code, the recommendation is 8.5 to 10 lbs of force. Consider
altering the closing mechanisms to lighten this effort.
•Move the toilet paper dispenser to be located seven to nine inches from
the front of the toilet to the centerline of the dispenser. ADA 604.7
PLAYGROUNDS
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements. However, the
entrance into the play area has a lip. The addition of a rubber surface is great
for accessibility, however, it is only in one portion of the playground.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 4 Restroom at Kensington Park
Figure 5 Playground at Kensington Park
Page 150 of 262
MARIE PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1780 Lilac Lane
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
• Parking Lot
• Basketball Court
• Playground
• Tennis Courts
• Ball Field
• Hockey Rink (Winter)
• Pickleball Courts
(Summer)
• Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot with the correct number of accessible spaces; however,
there is no sign to discourage parking in the access aisle.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Make sure to provide compliant signage. See MN Accessibility Codes
502.2 and 502.4 for requirements. Ensure that the access aisle has a “No
Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The route to the pickleball courts/hockey rink
has a ten percent slope with a lip.
Picnic Area
Accessible picnic tables are provided.
Courts/Field/Rink
The routes to the tennis courts, pickleball
courts/hockey rink, and playground are paved,
but the route to the basketball court is not. The
warming house seating is compliant.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Consider extending the existing ramp at the hockey rink to create a ramp
that is six percent or less. ADA 206.2.1
• Consider adding a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the basketball court.
MN Accessibility Code 302
RESTROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number
of accessible elements. However, the play
surface is engineered wood fiber.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is
an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the
wood shifts when used. Ensure this
playground is inspected regularly, raked
out, and maintained to meet accessible
requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 1 Accessible seating at
Marie Park
Figure 2 Accessible Restroom at
Marie Park.
Page 151 of 262
MENDAKOTA
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
2111 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Playground
•Volleyball Court
(Grass)
•Picnic Shelter
•Restrooms
•Basketball Court
•Ball Fields
•Soccer Field
•Overlay Football
Fields (Seasonal)
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot available. With 154 parking stalls, there should be six
accessible spaces, and only four are available. Current access aisles do not have
“no parking” signs.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide two additional parking spaces. For requirements, see MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4. Ensure that the access aisle has a
“No Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The walkways are clear. One stair near the ball fields
was loose. The rubber flooring at the playground has
been patched well when holes have occurred.
Picnic Area
Although an accessible table is provided at the
shelter, there are not enough accessible spaces
available.
Fields/Courts
Pathways to fields/courts are paved and generally flat. Several locations along
the trails were identified as having a steep running slope.
Drinking Fountains
The drinking fountain is too high and does not provide clearance for knees.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Replace the wooden step at the raised picnic area to avoid a trip hazard.
MN Accessibility Code 302
•Ensure there are accessible seating spaces dispersed throughout the
park. ADA 902
•Replace the drinking fountain with a maximum height of 36 inches from
the ground. ADA 602.4
Figure 1 Step in Raised Picnic
Area
Figure 2 Picnic Table at Mendakota Park
Page 152 of 262
TOILET ROOMS
Ball Field Toilets
The ball field area also has two gender-neutral accessible restrooms. Both
have doors that close quickly. Neither of them has tactile signs that have
Braille. Inside, the restrooms are fully compliant.
Portable Accessible Toilet
The accessible portable toilet is fully compliant.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Provide signage with tactile letters, braille, and contrasting letters
mounted at a compliant height. ADA 703.1
• Ensure that the door closer closes no quicker than 5 seconds. ADA
402.2.7.1
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements. However,
the sand table area does not provide a space for a wheelchair underneath.
The rubber patching jobs are well done to avoid trip hazards. Most of the
playground is available on the rubber ground and ramps. However, some
areas are sand and Engineered Wood Fiber.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the sand table. ADA 1008.2.1.
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 3 Restroom at Mendakota Park
Figure 4 Accessible Play Ramp at Mendakota
Page 153 of 262
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS DOG
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1360 Acacia Blvd
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Fenced Large Dog
Area
•Fenced Small Dog
Area
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is no parking lot available. There are no designated on-street parking
spaces.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider adding an accessible parking sign to the on-street parking so
that there is a designated parking space. ADA 502
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The walkways are clear. Some areas have a
bumpy surface. Class 5 gravel is loose and has
divots.
Picnic Area
There are tables provided; however, none are
accessible.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Ensure regular maintenance of the gravel
walkways to ensure they are stable and slip-resistant. ADA 403.2
•Add picnic tables that are ADA-compliant. ADA 4.32.2
TOILET ROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
Figure 1 Picnic Table at Dog Park
Figure 2 Accessible Restroom
at Dog Park
Page 154 of 262
OHEYAWAHE /
PILOT KNOB
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
2100 Pilot Knob
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
• Trails
• Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is an unstriped gravel parking area that can fit about eight cars. None are
designated as accessible.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Stripe an accessible parking space and aisle near the trailhead along the
accessible pathway. Make sure to provide compliant signage. See MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4 for requirements. Ensure that the
access aisle has a “No Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Several points along the walking trail have non-
compliant running slopes, though they would
not be considered severe.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Consider adding a compliant handrail to
put the sidewalk into compliance without
leveling the ground. ADA 405.8.
TOILET ROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
Figure 1 Walking trail at Pilot
Knob
Figure 2 Restroom at Pilot
Knob
Page 155 of 262
ROGERS LAKE
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1000 Wagon Wheel Trail
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Playground
•Volleyball Court
(Sand)
•Picnic Shelter
•Portable Toilet
•Fishing Pier
•Skate Park
•Basketball Court
•Canoe Rack Rental
Spaces
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
Two parking lots are available: one near the fishing pier and playground, and
the other near the skate park. The playground lot has a painted space, but does
not have signage to distinguish accessible parking. The skate park does not
have an accessible space provided.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide compliant signage and spaces. For requirements, see MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4. Ensure that the access aisle has a
“No Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Roots near the fishing pier make for an uneven
walking path.
Picnic Area
Although an accessible table is provided at the
shelter, the accessible portion of the table is
not on the accessible route.
Courts
Although there is no concrete path to the basketball or volleyball court,
pathways are through grass and are generally flat. At the time of the evaluation,
the weather was good. Grass pathways can become unstable and slippery in
adverse weather.
Figure 2 Basketball Court at Rogers
Lake
Figure 1 Playground Parking Lot at Rogers Lake Park
Figure 3 Picnic Table at Rogers Lake Park
Page 156 of 262
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the basketball court and fishing
pier. MN Accessibility Code 302
• Ensure a clear path to the accessible picnic tables. ADA 4.32.2
TOILET ROOMS
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet. The skate park area does not have a
close restroom.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Consider adding another portable accessible toilet near the skate park.
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements. However, the
entrance to the swing area has a lip and no accessible pathway. Adding a
rubber surface is great for accessibility; however, it is only in one portion of
the playground.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the swings. MN Accessibility
Code 302
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 4 Restroom at Rogers Lake Park
Figure 5 Swing Set at Rogers Lake Park
Page 157 of 262
VALLEY PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
821 Marie Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Ballfield
•Basketball Court
•Playground
•Tennis Courts
•Picnic Shelter
•Trails
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot with the correct number of accessible spaces; however,
there is no sign to discourage parking in the access aisle.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Make sure to provide compliant signage. See MN Accessibility Codes
502.2 and 502.4 for requirements. Ensure that the access aisle has a “No
Parking” sign at the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
A majority of the walking trail is too
steep.
Picnic Area
Accessible picnic tables are not provided.
Courts/Field
The route to the basketball court and
baseball field is compliant. The path to
the tennis court entrance is not paved.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the tennis court entrance. MN
Accessibility Code 302
•Add ADA-compliant picnic tables both by the playground and the picnic
area. ADA 4.32.2
RESTROOM
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
Figure 2 Restroom at Valley Park
Figure 1 Unpaved route to the tennis court
Page 158 of 262
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements. However, the
play surface is engineered wood fiber. There is an accessible digger, but it is
not on an accessible route.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the accessible digger. MN
Accessibility Code 302
Figure 3 Accessible digger at Valley Park
Page 159 of 262
VALLEY VIEW
HEIGHTS PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1056 Cullen Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Playground
•Basketball Court
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is no parking lot available. There are no designated on-street parking
spaces.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider adding an accessible parking sign to the on-street parking so
there is a designated parking space. ADA 502
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
The walkways are clear. One trail area near the highway has a running slope of
6.1.
Picnic Area
There are tables provided; however, none are accessible.
Court
The pathway to the basketball court is paved and generally flat.
Accessibility Recommendations
•The slope of the sidewalks is within the range of being considered
a “ramp,” so adding a compliant handrail would put the sidewalk into
compliance without leveling the ground. ADA 405.8
•Add picnic tables that are ADA-compliant. ADA 4.32.2
TOILET ROOM
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet. The threshold on the floor spans a gap, so
someone in a wheelchair would have difficulty getting into the restroom.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Level the threshold by moving the restroom or providing a flat surface to
span the gap. ADA 404.2.5
Figure 1 Raised Lip at Accessible Restroom
Page 160 of 262
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground has the correct number of accessible elements. However, the
Engineered Wood Fiber creates an unstable walking/rolling surface when not
adequately maintained.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
Figure 2 Playground at Valley View Heights
Page 161 of 262
VICTORIA
HIGHLANDS PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
1700 Diane Road
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
• Ball Field
• Basketball Court
• Playground
• Parking Lot
• Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot with the
correct number of accessible spaces.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
ACCESS TO GOODS AND
SERVICES
Walkways
Some of the walking paths are too steep.
Picnic Area
Accessible picnic tables are provided;
however, there are not enough ADA
seats, and they are only available at
the ball field.
Field/Court
The route to the basketball court is
compliant. The path to the baseball
field is not paved.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the baseball field. MN Accessibility
Code 302
• Add ADA-compliant picnic tables both by the playground and the picnic
area. ADA 4.32.2
RESTROOM
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
Figure 3 Restroom at Victoria Highlands
Figure 2 Accessible table at Victoria Highlands
Figure 1 Accessible parking at Victoria
Highlands
Page 162 of 262
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground does not have the correct number of accessible raised
components. The play surface is engineered wood fiber. There is a sand table,
but it is not on an accessible route.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
•Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the sand tables. MN Accessibility
Code 302
•The tunnel system that reaches most of the raised elements is not
considered a ramp or transfer system. Consider swapping the tunnel
for a transfer system (a series of accessible steps). ADA 240.2.1.2
Figure 4 Sand tables at Victoria Highlands
Page 163 of 262
WENTWORTH
PARK
Mendota Heights
ADA Parks Evaluation
739 Wentworth Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN
Amenities:
•Ball Field
•Basketball Court
•Playground
•Picnic Shelters
•Tennis Courts
•Pickleball Courts
(Summer)
•Trails
•Parking Lot
•Hockey Rink (Winter)
•Portable Toilet
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot with the
correct number of accessible
spaces; however, there is no sign to
discourage parking in the access aisle.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide compliant signage.
For requirements, see MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and
502.4. Ensure that the access
aisle has a “No Parking” sign at
the head.
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways
Most of the walking paths are
compliant.
Picnic Area
Accessible picnic tables are provided,
but are not dispersed amongst the
picnic areas. Compliant tables in the
picnic area are not spaced so that a
wheelchair can access the accessible
portion of the table.
Field/Courts
The routes to the fields/courts are compliant; however, the seating to view the
fields/courts is not paved. The areas beside the existing benches are flat and
could support a level seating area. The bench in the warming house is only 18
inches in depth.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider adding a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the seating areas. MN
Accessibility Code 302
•Add ADA-compliant picnic tables to both picnic areas. ADA 4.32.2
•Replace the seating in the warming house with one 20-24 inches deep.
ADA 903
Figure 2 Accessible table at Wentworth
Figure 1 Accessible parking at Wentworth
Page 164 of 262
RESTROOM
Accessible Portable Toilet
There is an accessible portable toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
• None
PLAYGROUND
Main Playground
The playground does have the correct number of accessible components. The
play surface is engineered wood fiber. There is an accessible digger, but it is
not on an accessible route.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Although Engineered Wood Fiber is an accessible play surface, it does
require the most maintenance as the wood shifts when used. Ensure
this playground is inspected regularly, raked out, and maintained to
meet accessible requirements. See ADA 401.
• Add a stable, slip-resistant pathway to the digger. MN Accessibility
Code 302
Figure 3 Accessible parking, restroom, and
walkway at Wentworth
Figure 4 Digger at Wentworth
Page 165 of 262
CITY HALL /
POLICE STATION
Mendota Heights
ADA Facilities Evaluation
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
• Parking Lot
• Restrooms
• Drinking Fountains
• Council Chambers
• Conference Rooms
• Service Counters
PARKING
City Hall Parking Lot
One parking lot is available, shared with the
Civic Center Ball Field. Recent patchwork
makes the parking spaces slope over five
percent in some spots. There is no sign
to discourage parking on the access aisle
(which should be restriped with the patch
job), and the parking space sign is too high.
Police Parking Lot
There is no sign to discourage parking on
the access aisle (which is too narrow).
Accessibility Recommendations
• Lower City Hall signs to 60-66” from
the parking surface. MN Accessibility
Code 502.4.4
• Regrade the parking spaces and
aisles to have a level landing. MN
Accessibility Code 502.5
• Stripe access aisles and ensure they
are 8’ wide for both the stall and
the access aisle. Include signage that
discourages parking on the aisle. MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and 502.4
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways and Entrance
City Hall’s curb ramp from the access aisle
has a too-short cross-slope and running
slope. One of the flares is broken. The
Police entrance curb ramp has a too-short
running slope. Both entrance doors are fully
compliant.
Elevator
The elevator was fully compliant at the time
of evaluation.
Conference Rooms and Gathering
Spaces
In City Hall, most conference rooms’
doorknobs were not operable without
grabbing and twisting. The City Council
Chambers did not have a way for wheelchair
users to access the councilmember or
staff seats. Seats in conference rooms are
movable for a variety of seating options.
In the Police Station, the forms table and
the reporting table were both compliant.
The reporting table does have a pinch
point issue for someone in a wheelchair to
navigate.
Figure 1 Parking space at City Hall
Figure 3 Broken flare at City Hall
Figure 4 Council Chambers at City
Hall
Figure 2 Parking space at Police
Entrance
Page 166 of 262
Drinking Fountains
The City Hall drinking fountain was fully compliant, but not detectable by a
cane.
Service Counters
The City Hall and the Police service counters are mounted too high at 42
inches.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Replace the curb ramps at each location with ramps compliant with MN
Accessibility Code 406.1.
• Provide door hardware that is operable with one hand and does not
require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting the wrist. The hardware
outside the door was not present during the inspection. ADA 404.2.7
• Provide a ramp, even if movable, that complies with MN Accessibility
Code 303.4 for the Council Chambers Seating.
• Ensure that the Police Reporting station only pinches to a minimum of
32 inches for a length of 24 inches. ADA 403.5.1
• Ensure that something below the drinking fountain would be detectable
by a cane. ADA 204.1
• Lower or replace the desk so the top is 36 inches from the floor. ADA
904.3.2
TOILET ROOMS
City Hall Restrooms
The City Hall provides both men’s and women’s restrooms. Both have tactile
signs, but they are not mounted on the latch side of the door. The doors are
heavy to operate, requiring ten pounds of force to open. The coat hooks in
both restrooms are mounted too high at 65 inches. The sinks in both locations
are not insulated. The men’s room stall is not wide enough to accommodate a
wheelchair. There is no rear grab bar in the men’s or women’s rooms. Neither
side grab bar is long enough. The toilet flush (men’s room) is not on the open
side of the toilet. The men’s stall door is not self-closing, and the door locks
cannot be operated without twisting/grasping.
Police Station Restrooms
The Police Station provides both men’s and women’s restrooms. Both have
tactile signs, but they are not mounted on the latch side of the door. The
doors are heavy to operate, requiring ten pounds of force to open. The coat
hooks in the women’s room are mounted too high at 65 inches. The sink in
the men’s room is not insulated. The toilet flush (men’s room) is not on the
open side of the toilet.
Figure 5 Drinking Fountain at City Hall
Figure 6 Doorknob at City Hall
Figure 7 Men’s restroom at City Hall
Page 167 of 262
Accessibility Recommendations
•Alter the door closer so the maximum pounds required to open the
door is no more than five pounds. ADA 404.2.8
•Provide signage mounted at a compliant height on the door’s wall (latch
side). ADA 703.1
•Insulate the sink pipes. ADA 606.6
•Lower coat hooks so they are a maximum of 48 inches from the floor.
ADA 604.8.
•Provide a grab bar at least 36 inches long on the rear wall. Ensure it
is installed so that 12 inches are available on the wall and at least 24
inches are on the open side. ADA 604.5
•Move the stall walls to ensure a 60-inch clearance around the stall
measured perpendicular from the sidewall. ADA 604.3
•Replace the existing grab bar with one that is 42 inches long on the side
wall. Ensure that it is no farther than 12 inches off the rear wall. Ensure
there is still a vertical grab bar available. ADA 604.5
•Replace with a toilet that has the flush on the open side of the toilet.
ADA 604.6
Figure 8 Men’s restroom at Police Station
Page 168 of 262
FIRE STATION
Mendota Heights
ADA Facilities Evaluation
2120 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Restrooms
•Conference Room
•Drinking Fountain
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot available. It does
have the correct number of accessible
spaces. The spaces are compliant; however,
there is no sign indicating not to park in the
access aisle.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Include signage that discourages
parking on the aisle. MN Accessibility
Codes 502.2 and 502.4
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways and Entrance
The walkways are clear and slip-resistant.
The entrance is fully compliant.
Drinking Fountains
The drinking fountain is compliant.
Front Desk
The front desk counter is compliant.
Conference Room / Kitchen
The conference room and attached kitchen
are compliant.
Accessibility Recommendations
•None
TOILET ROOMS
Main Toilet Rooms
There are men’s and women’s restrooms
provided. Both doors are heavy and require
ten pounds to open.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Alter the door so that the maximum
pounds required to open the door
is no more than five pounds. ADA
404.2.8
Figure 1 Parking space at the Fire Station
Figure 3 Men’s Restroom at the Fire
Station
Figure 2 Conference Room at the Fire
Station
Page 169 of 262
PAR 3
COMMUNITY
GOLF COURSE
Mendota Heights
ADA Facilities Evaluation
1695 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
•Parking Lot
•Restrooms
•Drinking Fountain
•Par 3 Golf Course
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot available.
It does have the correct number of
accessible spaces. However, the slopes
at the spaces and access aisles peaked
at five percent, outside the required two
percent level surface. The “no parking”
signs are mounted too high at 80 inches.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Consider regrading the parking
stalls and access aisles to have a
maximum slope of two percent. ADA 502.4
•Lower signs to 60-66” from the parking surface and centered on the
parking stall. MN Accessibility Code 502.4.4
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways and Entrance
The walkways are clear and slip-resistant. Entrance is fully compliant. ADA
accessible seating is dispersed.
Drinking Fountains
The drinking fountain is compliant.
Sales Counters
The sales counter has a height of 42 inches, while the maximum height allowed
is 36 inches for the accessible portion.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Lower or replace the desk so the top is 36 inches from the floor. ADA
904.3.2
TOILET ROOMS
Main Toilet Room
No tactile signs have Braille, and the
sign is mounted on the door. Inside, the
restrooms are mostly compliant. The
mirror is five inches too high, and the
toilet paper is twelve inches from the
front of the toilet.
Accessibility Recommendations
•Provide signage with tactile letters,
braille, and contrasting letters
mounted at a compliant height on the pull side of the door. ADA 703.1
•Lower the mirror to a maximum height of 40 inches. ADA 603.3
•Move the toilet paper dispenser to be located seven to nine inches from
the front of the toilet to the centerline of the dispenser. ADA 604.7
Figure 1 Parking space at Par 3 Golf Course
Figure 2 Restroom at Par 3 Golf Course
Page 170 of 262
PUBLIC WORKS
Mendota Heights
ADA Facilities Evaluation
2431 Lexington Ave
Mendota Heights
Amenities:
• Parking Lot
• Restrooms
• Drinking Fountain
PARKING
Main Parking Lot
There is one parking lot available.
Although there is a striped access aisle,
there are no designated accessible
parking spaces.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Include signage that discourages
parking on the aisle. MN
Accessibility Codes 502.2 and
502.4
• Provide designated parking
spaces for those with disabilities. Include signs 60-66” from the parking
surface and centered on the parking stall. Signs need to include
information about fines for violations. MN Accessibility Code 502.4.4
ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
Walkways and Entrance
The entrance doorway is fully compliant.
Although carpet rugs can create a less
slippery floor, they can also cause tripping
if not properly installed. At the time of
evaluation, the entrance rug was bumpy
and raised in some places.
Drinking Fountains
The drinking fountain is mounted too high
at 40 inches.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Ensure rugs are stuck to the floor to
avoid a tripping hazard. ADA 302.1
• Lower the drinking fountain to
ensure that the drinking spout is a
maximum height of 36 inches from
the ground. ADA 602.4
TOILET ROOMS
Unisex Toilet
There is one unisex restroom provided. Signage is present but mounted on the
door, which requires ten pounds of force to open. The coat hook is mounted
too high, at 65 inches. The sink pipes are not insulated. The paper towels are
mounted too high on the wall. Although the rear grab bar is too short, the wall
is too short to continue to the required length.
Accessibility Recommendations
• Alter the door closer so the maximum pounds required to open the door
is no more than five pounds. ADA 404.2.8
• Provide signage mounted at a compliant height on the door’s wall (latch
side). ADA 703.1
• Insulate the sink pipes. ADA 606.6
• Lower the mirror to a maximum height of 40 inches. ADA 603.3
• Lower the paper towels to be 15 to 48 inches from the ground
Figure 1 Parking space at Public Works
Figure 2 Drinking Fountain at Public
Works
Page 171 of 262
(unobstructed). ADA 308.3.1
•Lower coat hook so it is a maximum of 48 inches from the floor. ADA
604.8.
•Provide a grab bar at least 36 inches long on the rear wall (would need
to extend the wall surface). Ensure it is installed so that 12 inches are
available on the wall and at least 24 inches are on the open side. ADA
604.5
Figure 3 Restroom at Public Works
Page 172 of 262
77
Appendix D – Agency ADA Design Standards and Procedures
Design Standards
Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines
Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), developed by the Access Board, are draft
guidelines that address accessibility in the public rights-of-way. Sidewalks, street crossings, and other
elements of the public rights-of-way present unique challenges to accessibility for which specific guidance
is considered essential. The Access Board is developing these guidelines that will address various issues,
including access for visually impaired pedestrians at street crossings, wheelchair access to on-street
parking, and various constraints posed by space limitations, roadway design practices, slope, and terrain.
PROWAG can be found at https://www.access-board.gov/prowag/.
In 2010 and 2015, as a part of the development of MnDOT’s Transition Plan, MnDOT Issued Technical
Memorandum 10-02-TR-01 Adoption of Public Rights of way Accessibility Guidance and Technical
Memorandum No. 15--02-TR-01 Adoption of Public Rights-of -Way Accessibility Guidance (PROWAG),
respectively to their staff, cities, and counties. These memorandums, which have both expired, make the
PROWAG the primary guidance for accessible facility design on MnDOT projects. In addition, these
technical memorandums can be found on MnDOT’s website.
See https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/adaprojectdesignguide.pdf
Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way
The Access Board is proposing these accessibility guidelines for the design, construction, and alteration of
pedestrian facilities in the public right-of-way. The guidelines ensure that sidewalks, pedestrian street
crossings, pedestrian signals, and other facilities for pedestrian circulation and use constructed or altered
in the public right-of-way by state and local governments are readily accessible for pedestrians with
disabilities. When the guidelines are adopted, with or without additions and modifications, as accessibility
standards in regulations issued by other federal agencies implementing the ADA, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act, compliance with these accessibility standards is
mandatory. These proposed accessibility guidelines can be found on the Access Board website
(https://www.access-board.gov/) under Public Rights-of-Way or at https://www.access-
board.gov/prowag/
Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Planning and Design for Alterations (August 2007)
This report and its recommendations are the work of the Public Rights-of-Way Access Advisory Committee
(PROWAAC) – Subcommittee on Technical Assistance and are intended to provide technical assistance only.
The report is not a rule and has no legal effect. It has not been endorsed by the U.S. Access Board, the
Department of Justice, or the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation. Still it
can be a technical advisory source for engineers and technicians who are planning and designing for
alterations to pedestrian elements. This document is on the Access Board website (http://www.access-
board.gov) or at https://www.access-board.gov/prowag/
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Building on the adoption of PROWAG as planning and design guidance for accessible pedestrian facilities,
MnDOT has developed additional planning, design, and construction guidance that is available to local
Page 173 of 262
78
agencies. Listed below is information on additional design guidance available. This is not intended to be
an exclusive or comprehensive list of ADA guidance, but rather an acknowledgement of guidance staff
should consider and a starting point for information on providing accessible pedestrian facilities.
The MnDOT Accessibility webpage, which has good information in a variety of subject areas related to
ADA and accessibility, can be found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/index.html. The webpage also
provides the ability to sign up for ADA policy and design training classes when available and to review
material from previous trainings.
Pedestrian ramp Guidelines: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/curbramp.pdf
ADA Project Design Guide Memo:
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/adaprojectdesignguidememo.pdf
ADA Design Guide: https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/adaprojectdesignguide.pdf
Pedestrian Ramp Details Standard Plans 5-297.250 can be found on MnDOT’s website at
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/5-297-250.pdf
Driveway and Sidewalk Details Standard Plans 5-297.254 can be found on MnDOT’s website at
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/pdf/driveway-sidewalk-details.pdf
MnDOT’s 7000 series Standard Plates, which are approved standards drawings, provide information on
standard details of construction and materials related to curbs, gutters, and sidewalks are on MnDOT’s
website at https://www.dot.state.mn.us/design/design-standards/standard-plates.html
The MnDOT Facility Design Guide serves as a uniform design guide for engineers and technicians working
on MnDOT projects. The document is available to others (such as Dakota County) as a technical resource.
Chapter 11 – Special Designs, includes information on the design of pedestrian facilities. The Road
Design Manual can be found at https://www.dot.state.mn.us/design/design-standards/facility-design-
guide.html
MnDOT’s Pedestrian Accommodations Through Work Zones webpage,
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/apr.html contains information on providing
accessibility during impacts due to maintenance or construction activities.
Design Procedures
Intersection Corners
Mendota Heights intends to construct or upgrade pedestrian ramps to achieve compliance with its Capital
Improvement Plan projects. There may be limitations that make it technically infeasible for an intersection
corner to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted, and
those intersection corners will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise,
those intersection corners shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless of whether full
compliance can be achieved, each intersection corner shall be made as compliant as possible by the
judgment of City staff.
Page 174 of 262
79
Sidewalks / Trails
Mendota Heights will coordinate with municipalities and/or government agencies responsible for
sidewalks and trails located within the city's right of way to evaluate and attempt to construct or upgrade
sidewalks and paths to achieve compliance as part of Capital Improvement Plan projects. There may be
limitations that make it technically infeasible for segments of sidewalks or trails to achieve full accessibility
within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted, and those segments will remain on the
transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those segments shall continue to be incorporated
into future work. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved, every sidewalk or trail shall be
made as compliant as possible by the judgment of City staff.
Traffic Control Signals
Mendota Heights will attempt to work with agency owners to construct or upgrade traffic control signals
to achieve compliance as part of Capital Improvement Plan projects. There may be limitations that make
it technically infeasible for individual traffic control signal locations to achieve full accessibility within the
scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted, and those locations will remain on the transition
plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those locations shall continue to be incorporated into future
work. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved, each traffic signal control location shall be
made as compliant as possible by the judgment of City staff and road authorities.
Public Buildings and Parks
Mendota Heights will evaluate and, where feasible, construct or upgrade park and building facilities such
as playgrounds, fishing piers, skate parks, courts and fields, restrooms, picnic areas, and other public
amenities to achieve compliance as part of Capital Improvement Plan projects. There may be limitations
that make it technically infeasible for certain features to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any
project. Those limitations will be noted, and those facilities will remain on the transition plan. As future
projects or opportunities arise, those facilities shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved, each facility shall be made as compliant as possible
by the judgment of City staff.
Other policies, practices, and programs
Policies, practices, and programs not identified in this document will follow the applicable ADA standards.
Page 175 of 262
80
Appendix E – ADA Coordinator
City of Mendota Heights ADA Coordinator
Ryan Ruzek | Public Works Director
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Phone: 651-452-1850
Email: rruzek@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Page 176 of 262
81
Appendix F – ADA Public Notice
As part of the ADA requirements, the City has posted the following notice outlining its ADA
requirements:
Public Notice
According to the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Mendota Heights
will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities based on disability in city services,
programs, or activities.
Employment: The City does not discriminate based on disability in its hiring or employment practices
and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Effective Communication: The City will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services
leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally
in the City’s programs, services, and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents
in Braille, and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have
speech, hearing, or vision impairments.
Modifications to Policies and Procedures: The City will make all reasonable modifications to policies and
programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all City programs,
services, and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City offices, even
where pets are generally prohibited.
Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication or a modification of policies
or procedures to participate in a City program, service, or activity should contact the office of the ADA
Coordinator (see Appendix E) as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event.
The ADA does not require the City to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its
programs or services or impose an undue financial or administrative burden.
The City will not charge a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with
disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable policy modifications, such
as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use
wheelchairs.
Page 177 of 262
82
Appendix G – Public Outreach Materials
The following pages include the PowerPoint presented at the Open House and City Council Meeting.
Page 178 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ADA TRANSITION
PLAN OPEN HOUSE
Discussing accessibility improvements for community inclusion
1
Page 179 of 262
ADA
TRANSITION
PLAN
OVERVIEW
2
Page 180 of 262
WHAT IS AN ADA
TRANSITION PLAN?
Americans with Disabilities Act Law
Overview
The ADA prohibits discrimination against
individuals with disabilities and mandates
equal access to public services and
infrastructure.
Community Commitment
The plan reflects Mendota Heights’
dedication to equity, safety, and inclusion for
all residents and visitors.
3
Page 181 of 262
WHAT DOES IT
INCLUDE?
Components of the Plan
Includes evaluating existing infrastructure,
prioritizing improvements, and scheduling
implementation for full accessibility.
•Pedestrian Ramps
•Sidewalks/Trails
•Crosswalks
•Pedestrian Signals
•Parks and Park Amenities
•Public Buildings
•Policies and Practices
4
Page 182 of 262
PLAN PURPOSE &
GOALS
Purpose of the Plan
Ensure safe and comfortable access to public infrastructure for all residents, workers, and visitors.
Compliance and Integration
Align with federal ADA standards and MnDOT guidelines while integrating upgrades into the Capital Improvement Plan.
Enhancing Mobility and Safety
Improve pedestrian safety and mobility for all individuals through infrastructure/policy/practice evaluations.
Community Engagement
Use public engagement to inform decision-making and foster an inclusive culture in Mendota Heights.
5
Page 183 of 262
INFRASTRUCTURE EVALUATION AND FINDINGS
6
Page 184 of 262
WHAT WAS
EVALUATED?
Comprehensive Infrastructure Assessment
Mendota Heights evaluated public infrastructure,
including ramps, sidewalks, trails, Accessible
Pedestrian Signals (APS), parks, buildings, policies, and
practices, for ADA compliance.
Use of Advanced Technology
Data was collected using GPS technology and Esri
ArcGIS software to assess condition and accessibility
accurately.
Detailed Accessibility Criteria
Pedestrian ramps, sidewalks, and APS were assessed
with specific criteria such as slope, tactile warnings,
obstructions, and signal timing.
Foundation for Future Improvements
Evaluation results informed the ADA Transition Plan,
prioritizing improvements in accessibility across city
infrastructure.
7
Page 185 of 262
KEY FINDINGS
INFRASTRUCTURE
TYPE TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER
COMPLIANT % COMPLIANT
Pedestrian Ramps 488 258 53%
Sidewalks, Trails,
and Crossings 864 435 50%
APS Signals 50 36 72%
City Parks 15 N/A*N/A*
City Buildings 4 N/A*N/A*
*Due to the complexity and scale of these facilities, a simple pass/fail rating is not applicable.
8
Page 186 of 262
PRIORITIZATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
9
Page 187 of 262
PRIORITY AREAS Tier 1 - High-Priority Areas
This includes non-compliant ramps located near
government facilities, schools, and parks that are
essential for vulnerable populations.
Tier 2 - Medium-Priority Zones
This includes non-compliant ramps not near the
locations listed above
Tier 3 - Lower -Priority Locations
This includes compliant ramps that could diminish
compliance over time.
Data-Driven Prioritization
Field data and community feedback inform the
prioritization to reflect real needs and technical
insights.
10
Page 188 of 262
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
SUMMARY
Community Engagement Methods
Surveys (77 received) and interactive mapping (13
comments)gathered valuable input on
accessibility priorities from residents.
Demographics and Feedback
Most respondents were aged 55+, with nearly 30%
identifying as individuals with disabilities,
highlighting diverse accessibility needs.
Key Accessibility Concerns
Concerns included inconsistent accessibility,
winter maintenance challenges, gaps in
sidewalks, unsafe intersections, and the need for
better crossings.
Impact on Planning
Community feedback shaped improvement
priorities and emphasized clear communication in
the ADA Transition Plan development.11
Page 189 of 262
POLICIES, COSTS,
AND
IMPLEMENTATION
12
Page 190 of 262
POLICY HIGHLIGHTS
Policy Language to Maintain
•Sidewalk Maintenance and Snow Removal
•Property owners must clear sidewalkswithin 24 hours of snowfall to ensureaccessibility and safety for all pedestrians.
•Accessible Parking Enforcement
•The city enforces designated accessibleparking spaces and prohibits unauthorizeduse to support individuals with disabilities.
Policy Language to Improve
•Pedestrian Safety Policies
•Policies regulate skateboarding and biking toprotect pedestrian safety, includingrestrictions in business districts and cyclistyielding rules
•Digital Accessibility Compliance
•City website adheres to Section 508 andWCAG standards, ensuring accessibility ofonline information for all users.
13
Page 191 of 262
IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE AND PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS
ITEM COST RANGE
Pedestrian Ramp Replacement $5K–$10K
APS Revisions (single crossing)$25K–$40K
Full APS Intersection retrofit (4 legs)$200K–$300K
Replacement Sidewalk (per foot)$40-80 ($50-$100 for New)
Replacement Trail (per foot)$30-80 ($40-90 for New)
14
Page 192 of 262
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
AND NEXT
STEPS
15
Page 193 of 262
HOW TO STAY
INVOLVED
Encouraging Community Input
Share your thoughts, concerns,
and suggestions on accessibility
improvements to shape the ADA
plan.
Report Issues
Reach out to the ADA
Coordinator to report
accessibility issues and request
accommodations
Ongoing Updates and Reviews
Stay tuned for regular plan
updates.
16
Page 194 of 262
97
Appendix H – Grievance Procedure
In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City has developed the following ADA grievance procedure to
promptly and fairly resolve the public’s complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances.
The City understands that public members may desire to contact staff to discuss ADA issues without filing
a formal grievance. Members of the public wishing to contact the ADA Coordinator should reference the
contact information in Appendix E. Discussing ADA issues with staff is welcome and does not limit a
person’s ability or right to file a formal grievance later.
Those wishing to file a formal written grievance with the City of Mendota Heights may do so by one of the
following methods:
Telephone
To submit an oral grievance, contact the City of Mendota Heights’ ADA Coordinator listed in the Contact
Information section of Appendix E. The ADA Coordinator will use a form located in Appendix I to submit
the grievance on behalf of the person filing it.
Paper Submission
A paper copy of the City’s grievance form (available in Appendix I) is also available by request from the City
of Mendota Heights’ ADA Coordinator (contact information in Appendix E). Complete the form and submit
it to the City of Mendota Heights ADA Coordinator at the address listed.
Grievance Timeline
The City of Mendota Heights will acknowledge receipt of the grievance to the individual within 10 working
days of the submission. City staff will then provide a response or resolution to the grievance or will provide
information on when the citizen can expect a response. If the grievance filed does not fall within the City
of Mendota Heights’ jurisdiction, staff will work with the individual to contact the agency with jurisdiction.
When possible (typically within 60 calendar days or less of the grievance submission), City staff will
investigate the alleged violation's validity. As part of the investigation, internal staff will be consulted to
understand the complaint and possible solutions fully. The City of Mendota Heights staff will contact the
individual to discuss the investigation and propose a resolution.
The City of Mendota Heights will consider all grievances within its particular context or setting.
Furthermore, the department will consider many varying circumstances, including access to applicable
services, programs, or facilities, the nature of the disability, essential eligibility requirements for
participation, the health and safety of others, and the degree to which a potential solution would
constitute a fundamental alteration to the program, service, or facility or cause undue hardship to the City
of Mendota Heights.
Accordingly, the resolution by the City of Mendota Heights of any one grievance does not constitute a
precedent upon which the City is bound or upon which other complaining parties may rely.
Complaints of Title II violations may be filed with the Department of Justice (DOJ) within 180 days of the
date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by
Page 195 of 262
98
the DOJ. The DOJ may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve
violations.
For more information, contact:
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Disability Rights Section – NYAV
Washington, D.C. 20530 http://www.ada.gov
(800) 514-0301 (voice)
(800) 514-0383 (TTY)
Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. Before going to court, it is not
necessary to file a complaint with the DOJ or any other Federal agency or to receive a “right-to-sue”
letter.
File Retention
The City of Mendota Heights shall maintain ADA grievance files on behalf of the City for seven years.
Page 196 of 262
99
Appendix I – Complaint Form
See the following three pages for the complaint form.
Page 197 of 262
100
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and - Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 Discrimination Complaint Form
Instructions: Please fill this form completely, in black ink or type. Sign and return to the ADA Coordinator as
specified in Appendix E. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Complainant Name:
Street Address:
Telephone (Home):
Telephone (Business):
Person Discriminated Against (if other than the complainant):
Address:
Telephone (Home/Business or Both):
Government, organization, or institution that you believe has discriminated:
Name:
Address:
State and Zip Code:
Telephone Number:
Page 198 of 262
101
When was the issue discovered/when did the problem occur? (Date):
Describe the issue in detail, providing the name(s) of the individuals contacted, where possible. (Add
additional pages if necessary):
Page 199 of 262
102
Have prior efforts been made to resolve this complaint through the grievance procedure? Yes
No
If Yes, what is the status of the grievance?
Has the complaint been filed with another bureau of the Department of Justice or any other Federal, State,
or local civil rights agency or court?
Yes No
If Yes: Agency or Court:
Contact Person:
Street Address:
City, State, and Zip Code:
Telephone Number:
Date Filed:
Do you intend to file with another agency or court? Yes No
If Yes: Agency or Court:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Signature:
Name:
Date:
Return to:
ADA Coordinator as specified in Appendix E of the Transition Plan.
Page 200 of 262
103
Appendix J - Notice of Rights
Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (13.04 subd. 2), we are required to inform you of
your rights before collecting any private or confidential data from you. The data you provide in this
complaint form is being collected to evaluate and investigate your complaint. The information provided
will be used by the appropriate staff and designees to evaluate and process your complaint/concerns
within the public right-of-way. You are not legally required to provide this information; however, failure to
provide sufficient information may limit our ability to investigate your complaint. The data you provide is
classified as private under Minn Stat. 13.44 or other applicable law. The data you provide may be shared
with authorized staff, Mendota Heights officials, or designees authorized by law to access it or other
parties as required by law.
The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act requires that you be informed that the following
information you are asked to provide is considered private.
The purpose and intended use of the requested information is:
To assist Mendota Heights staff and designees in evaluating and responding to accessibility concerns within
the public right of way.
Authorized persons or agencies with whom this information may be shared include:
Mendota Heights officials, staff or designee
Furnishing the above information is voluntary, but refusal to supply the requested information will mean:
Mendota Heights staff may be unable to respond to or evaluate your request.
MINN. STAT. §13.04(2)
Page 201 of 262
9.b
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-72 Approving the application of M&M Home Contractors
for a MRCCA Permit for a residential addition to a single-family home at
1122 Orchard Circle (Planning Case No. 2025-19)
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community
Development Manager
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-72 Approving a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit
for M&M Home Contractors to allow for a residential addition at 1122 Orchard Circle.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is requesting a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to allow
for the construction of a sunroom and porch addition to the existing single-family home at
1122 Orchard Circle.The property is located within the MRCCA Separated-from-River District.
Within this district, a MRCCA Permit is required for most new construction or expansion of
principal structures, including additions to existing dwellings.The property is part of a
developed residential neighborhood and is located near the perimeter of the MRCCA District
boundary, where impacts to scenic views and river corridor character are minimal.
The applicant proposes to construct a 399-sq.ft. sunroom addition extending from the side of
the existing home, with a future 328-sq.ft. attached screened porch, extending north-northeast
from the side wall of the home. As part of the main floor addition of the sunroof, the
basement level will be excavated to accommodate additional living space beneath this
addition. The proposed improvements are located entirely outside of the Bluff Impact Zone
(BIZ), bluff setback, and any identified Primary Conservation Areas, minimizing potential
impacts on sensitive land, vegetation, or slope stability.
At the October 28, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, a planning report was presented. A
duly noticed public hearing was held, where no residents spoke relating to the application. The
applicant was present and available to answer questions of the Commission.
A copy of the 10/28/2025 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the
unapproved minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff
Page 202 of 262
recommended approval of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning
Commission affirmed the staff recommendation and voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend
to the City Council approval of this MRCCA Permit with findings-of-fact and certain conditions,
as outlined in the attached [draft] Resolution.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-72 Approving the application of M&M Home Contractors for a MRCCA
Permit for a residential addition to a single-family home at 1122 Orc
2.Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes 10-28-25
3.Planning Commission Staff Report 10-28-25
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship
Page 203 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-72 Page | 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-72
RESOLUTION APPROVING A MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA
(MRCCA) PERMIT TO M&M HOME CONTRACTORS AND FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
PLANNING CASE 2025-19
WHEREAS, M&M Home Contractors, (the “Applicant”) made an Application for a
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to allow for an addition to a single-
family home and associated site improvements, located at 1122 Orchard Circle, and legally
described in Exhibit A (the “Subject Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided LDR-Low Density Residential in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan, zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, and is situated in the Mississippi River
Corridor Critical Area Overlay District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Title 12-6A-3: Mississippi River Corridor Critical
Area Overlay District, a permit is required to approve any new development activities involving a
building permit, land disturbance, vegetation removal, or special zoning approval, and the
Applicant is seeking permission to make site improvements under the rules and standards
established by the R-1 District and the related Mississippi River Corridor Critical Overlay District
ordinance and standards; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the proposed MRCCA Permit, whereby a planning report was presented and
received by the Planning Commission, and comments from the applicant and public were allowed,
and whereupon closing the hearing, the Commission recommended unanimously 6-0 to approve
the MRCCA Permit, which would allow a residential addition on the subject property, with certain
conditions and findings-of-fact to support said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that
the recommendation from the Planning Commission on Planning Case No. 2025-19 is hereby
affirmed, and may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact:
1.The proposed addition of a sunroom and screen porch meets the general purpose and
intent of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Separated from
River Overlay District.
2.The proposed work and disturbance to remove the existing egress and steps, and
construction the sunroom and screen porch addition to the existing home are low-
intensity with no anticipated impact to Primary Conservation Areas or Bluff Impact
Zones within the MRCCA Plan, and the project includes restoration of the landscaped
Page 204 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-72 Page | 2
area of the yard with turf and new perennial beds. The proposed project is within the
spirit and intent of the MRCCA Separated from River Overlay District that provides
for flexibility within the management purpose.
3.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare
of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will
not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in
harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive
Plan.
4.The construction of the addition is shown in the plan to comply with all standards and
regulations of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District and
illustrates consistency with the Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances;
represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current
single-family development pattern of the neighborhood.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the MRCCA
Permit requested for the property located at 1122 Orchard Circle is hereby approved, with the
following conditions:
1.A building permit must be approved by the City prior to the commencement of any site
work.
2.The proposed project must comply with all requirements of the City’s Land
Disturbance Guidance Document. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Director.
3.All erosion control requirements must be put in place prior to the commencement of
any grading and site work activities. Such measures must remain in place for the
duration of the construction activities until proper site restoration plans are completed.
4.All grading and construction activity must comply with applicable federal, state, and
local regulations and codes.
5.All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM
Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekends.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of November 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Page 205 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-72 Page | 3
________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 206 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-72 Page | 4
EXHIBIT A
Address: 1122 Orchard Circle
PIN: 27-81275-02-040
Legal Description:
Real property in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 4, Block 2, VALS ADDITION
Page 207 of 262
DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EXCERPT FROM DRAFT/UNAPPROVED 10/28/25 PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
A)PLANNING CASE 2025-19
M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE – MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA (MRCCA) PERMIT
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the
applicant and owners’ representative of the property located at 1122 Orchard Circle, and
has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to allow for
the construction of a sunroom and porch addition to the existing single-family home on the
subject property.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a
presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing
through the City’s website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Chair Field opened the public hearing.
Mike Fritz, M&M Home Contractors, was present to address any questions.
Commissioner Johnson thanked the applicant for the extensive landscaping plan, along with the
use of native plants. She provided input on different species of native plants and their likes.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close
the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE
PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER __, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MRCCA PERMIT REQUEST BY M&M HOME
CONTRACTORS FOR 1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT
FOR APPROVAL AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1.A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK.
Page 208 of 262
DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES
2.THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. ALL PLANS MUST BE
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.
3.ALL EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY GRADING AND SITE WORK ACTIVITIES. SUCH
MEASURES MUST REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL PROPER SITE RESTORATION PLANS ARE
COMPLETED.
4.ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST COMPLY WITH
APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES.
5.ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00
A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M.
WEEKENDS.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its November 5, 2025,
meeting.
Page 209 of 262
Planning Commission
Meeting Date: October 28, 2025
Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-19 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA)
Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a MRCCA Permit for a
residential addition to a single-family home at 1122 Orchard Circle
Department: Community
Development
Contact: Sarah Madden,
Community Development
Manager
Introduction:
M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners' Representative of the property located
at 1122 Orchard Circle, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA)
Permit to allow for the construction of a sun-room and porch addition to the existing single-
family home on the subject property.
A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice letters
were mailed to all surrounding properties within 350-ft of the subject property. No public
comments relating to this application have been received as of the submittal of this report.
Background:
The applicant is requesting a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to allow
for the construction of a sunroom and porch addition to the existing single-family home at
1122 Orchard Circle. The subject site is 21,402 sq-ft. in size, and is located within the Vals
Addition plat. The property is located at the south-eastern terminus of the Orchard Circle cul-
de-sac, within a well-established residential neighborhood. The existing home was
constructed in 1989, and the lot is developed with a single-family dwelling, attached garage,
and associated landscaping.
The property is located within the MRCCA Separated-from-River District. Within this district, a
MRCCA Permit is required for most new construction or expansion of principal structures,
including additions to existing dwellings. The purpose of the MRCCA District is to identify
development standards and considerations for land uses that have potential to affect primary
conservation areas and public river corridor views, and to establish design standards that
protect those primary conservation areas and public river corridor views from development
impacts, including protection standards for the biological and ecological functions of
vegetation, natural character and topography of the MRCCA, bluff and shoreline stability,
water quality, and other resources identified in the MRCCA Plan.
Proposed Improvements
The applicant proposes to construct a 399-sq.ft. sunroom addition extending from the side of
the existing home, with a future 328-sq.ft. attached screened porch, extending north-northeast
from the side wall of the home. As part of the main floor addition of the sunroof, the basement
level will be excavated to accommodate additional living space beneath this addition.
Page 210 of 262
To accommodate the addition, existing steps and egress from the lower level of the home will
be removed. The proposed improvements are located entirely outside of the Bluff Impact Zone
(BIZ), bluff setback, and any identified Primary Conservation Areas, minimizing potential
impacts on sensitive land, vegetation, or slope stability. The lot currently contains mature
landscaping near the addition area. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan showing
which existing plant materials will be removed and replaced with a new planting bed that
complements the site’s existing vegetation. This approach aligns with MRCCA standards
emphasizing preservation and enhancement of natural vegetation.
The property is part of a developed residential neighborhood and is located near the perimeter
of the MRCCA District boundary, where impacts to scenic views and river corridor character
are minimal. The proposed addition is modest in scale relative to the existing dwelling, and the
siting preserves established setbacks and open space around the home. Because the site is
already developed, the project primarily involves modification to an existing structure and
associated landscaping, rather than new disturbance of previously undisturbed areas.
Analysis:
Per Title 12, Chapter 6 Critical Area Overlay District a Critical Area Permit is required for the
subject project. The following summary of the site is provided as reference:
Standard Subject Property Conditions
MRCCA Sub District Separated from River
Bluff on Site? No.
Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) No. The subject property is located over
500-ft from the BIZ.
Significant Vegetative Stands or Primary
Conservation Area (PCA)
No. The proposed home is located more
than 500-feet from any PCA or significant
vegetation.
Subject to Section 12-6A-9 Vegetation
Management
No, does not meet criteria as no significant
vegetative removal required as part of the
proposed improvements.
Subject to Section 12-6A-11 Land
Alteration Standards and Stormwater
Management
No. The proposed improvements are not
within the Bluff Impact Zone, at or below
the Ordinary High Water Mark, or the
Water Quality Impact Zone.
Subject to Section 12-6A-12 Site Plan
Requirements
Yes. Must include Site Plan and
Landscape Plan
As described in Section 12-6A-4 C.3., the Separated from River (SR) sub-district describes
the management purpose as:
“...provides flexibility in managing development without negatively affecting the key
resources and features of the river corridor. Minimizing negative impacts to primary
conservation areas and minimizing erosion and the flow of untreated storm water into the
river are priorities…”
The MRCCA Map of the subject property illustrates that the subject property is greater than
500-ft away from the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ), and no Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) are
Page 211 of 262
present. The proposed configuration of the sunroom addition and screen porch will not impact
the bluff line or encroach into the BIZ, nor will it adversely impact identified PCAs within the
MRCCA District.
Per Code Sect. 12-6A-12, the Detailed Site Plan must be drawn to scale and the proposed
project accurately described through narrative and supporting maps and/or plans. The plan set
for the addition is attached to this report, and the Site Survey and Landscaping Plan are
included. The proposed location for the addition and screen porch are consistent with required
setbacks for the R-1 Zoning District. The addition is proposed above the location of an existing
egress and steps, which will be removed as part of the building permit for this work. The
existing landscaped area within the improvement area includes one (1) Spruce tree which is
scheduled for removal to accommodate the addition. The removal of this tree falls below the
Forest Preservation Ordinance removal threshold and so a Forest Alteration Permit and
Management Plan is not required. A new landscape bed will be installed following completion
of the addition including both native and pollinator-attracting perennials. The landscape design
and plant schedule is provided on the L-102 Landscape Plan attached to this report. The
applicant has also provided details on the survey of the property indicating that with the
proposed improvements, the site will have a proposed impervious surface coverage of 34.8%,
which is consistent with the maximum 35% required within the R-1 Zoning District.
Overall, the proposed sunroom and screened porch addition is compatible with the character
of the surrounding neighborhood, maintains required setbacks, and includes a landscaping
plan to mitigate temporary and permanent impacts to the established turf yard from
construction. Staff finds that the project meets the intent of the MRCCA regulations and City
standards for development in this district.
Interagency Review
Under the MRCCA Ordinance, the city is required to submit the MRRCA permit request to the
MNDNR and the National Park Service (NPS). The plan set and project information was
transmitted to both agencies for their review and comment. At the time of this report, the
City's Area DNR Hydrologist has responded that they have no comments on this application,
but we have not received any comments from the NPS. Staff will provide a verbal update of
their correspondence at the Planning Commission meeting.
Alternatives:
A.Approve the MRCCA Permit request for 1122 Orchard Circle based on the findings-of-
fact that the proposed project is compliant with the policies and standards of the
MRCCA Overlay District and City Zoning Code standards, with certain conditions; or
B.Deny the MRCCA Permit request for 1122 Orchard Circle, based on revised or
amended findings-of-fact that the application does not meet certain policies and
standards of City Code as determined by the Planning Commission; or
C.Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant;
Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota
State Statute 15.99.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the MRCCA Permit request by M&M Home Contractors for
1122 Orchard Circle, based on the attached findings-of-fact for approval and with the following
conditions:
1.A building permit must be approved by the City prior to the commencement of any site
Page 212 of 262
work.
2. The proposed project must comply with all requirements of the City’s Land Disturbance
Guidance Document. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works
Director.
3. All erosion control requirements must be put in place prior to the commencement of any
grading and site work activities. Such measures must remain in place for the duration of
the construction activities until proper site restoration plans are completed.
4. All grading and construction activity must comply with applicable federal, state, and
local regulations and codes.
5. All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM
Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekends.
Attachments:
1. Findings of Fact for Approval
2. Site Location Map
3. 1122 Orchard Circle Survey
4. 1122 Orchard Circle Landscape Plans
5. A1/A2 - Proposed Elevations
6. D1 - Addition Building Sections
Page 213 of 262
Planning Case 2025-19 (MRCCA Permit for 1122 Orchard Circle)
Page 1 of 1
FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL
MRCAA -Critical Area Permit
for
1122 Orchard Circle
The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests:
1.The proposed addition of a sunroom and screen porch meets the general purpose and intent of the
Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Separated from River Overlay District.
2.The proposed work and disturbance to remove the existing egress and steps, and construction the
sunroom and screen porch addition to the existing home are low-intensity with no anticipated
impact to Primary Conservation Areas or Bluff Impact Zones within the MRCCA Plan, and the
project includes restoration of the landscaped area of the yard with turf and new perennial beds.
The proposed project is within the spirit and intent of the MRCCA Separated from River Overlay
District that provides for flexibility within the management purpose.
3.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the
community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously
depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
4.The construction of the addition is shown in the plan to comply with all standards and regulations
of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District and illustrates consistency with the
Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances; represents reinvestment in a residential
neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and
is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood.
Page 214 of 262
666666666666666666666666
6666666666666666
66666666(
*
*
*
!*
"
"³
"
³
*
**
³
(
"
*
³
³(
**
*
³³³³³³³³
³
"
""""
*
³
³
³
³³
"*
"
"666666666666 666666
6
6
666
6666666
66666666!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2 !!2 !!2
!!2!!2
!!2!!2
!!2
!!2 !!2
!!2
!!2 !!2
!!2
!!2
!!2!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2
1787
1795
1127 1813
185018331851
1149
1854
11201849
1125
1094
1122
11171133
1140
1145 11351139
1128
1830
1794
1134
1143 1135 1129
1124
1095
1838
1813
1853
1120
1091
1091
1176
1151
1089
1127
1758
18441841 1089
1167
1165
11171133113511391145
1775
1154
1088
11151117
1128
1146
1127 11251144115611541164
1157
1145
1136
1135
1138
1147
1137
1166
1155
1126
1094
1794
1775 1118
1095
11161775
1085
1840
1147
1855
1768
1858
1160
ORCHARD PL
LEXINGTON AVEORCHARD CIR
KINGSLEY CIR S
KINGSLEY CT
ORCHARD HEIGHTS LNOVERLOOK RD
Nearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN
Site Location/Aerial Map1122 Orchard Circle
Date: 10/24/2025
City ofMendotaHeights0170
SCALE IN FEET
GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights.
Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation.
Page 215 of 262
AREAS & IMPERVIOUSPROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY INFORMATION
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY and EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
CERTIFICATION
202430
SISU LAND SURVEYING
2580 Christian Dr.
Chaska, MN 55318
612-418-6828
for M&M HOME CONTRACTORS
REVISED 10/10/2025 MRCCA & SOIL NOTES
LEGEND
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
EXISTING SOILS
SOIL LOSS
FOREST ALTERATION
MRCCA (CRITICAL AREA) PERMIT LAND ALTERATION
MRCCA (CRITICAL AREA) PERMIT VEGETATION CLEARING
MRCCA (CRITICAL AREA) PERMIT SITE PLAN
STORMWATER
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Page 216 of 262
BR BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR BR BR BR(1) EXISTING SPRUCE TREE(6) EXISTING HOSTA(1) EXISTING SPIREA(1) EXISTING ASTILBE(1) EXISTING ASTILBE(1) EXISTING DAYLILLY(1) EXISTING ASTILBE(2) EXISTING HEUCHERA(1) EXISTING ASTILBEL-101LANDSCAPEREMOVALSGROUND COVER LEGENDLEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEEXISTING DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH TO BESALVAGED FOR REUSELANDSCAPE REMOVAL NOTES1.ONE TREE OF THE 26 EXISTING TREES ON THIS PROPERTY IS SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL TO MAKE ROOMFOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION AS INDICATED. AS INDICATED IN THE PHOTO ABOVE, MOST OF THE LOWERBRANCHES HAVE DIED OFF DUE TO THE AGE OF THE TREE AND SHADING BY THE SURROUNDING TREES.2.ONE TREE REMOVED FROM THE 26 EXISTING TREES IS LESS THAN 4% REMOVAL BASED ON INDIVIDUAL TREECOUNT. A FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FOREST ALTERATION PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED.3.EXISTING DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH AND BRICK PAVER LANDSCAPE EDGING TO BE SALVAGED FORREINSTALLATION OF NEW LANDSCAPE BED.EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREEDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 10/13/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0006Z:\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0006 - Orchard Circle\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-101 Landscape Removals.dwg
ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:10/13/2025 1:58:11 PM
SUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
ADDITION
1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118
PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O.BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM10/13/20250110/13/2025 PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL 01CONIFEROUS TREE TO BEREMOVEDHERBACEOUS PLANT TO BEREMOVEDEXISTING BRICK EDGER TO BE SALVAGED FORREUSELANDSCAPE AREA AND TREE TO BE REMOVEDPage 217 of 262
BR BRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBRBR BR BR BR(5) SS(4) SS(4) SS(3) CA(3) CAINTERMIXED, CLUSTERPLANTINGS OF:(6) LC(6) LS(7) RHL-102LANDSCAPE PLANGROUND COVER LEGENDPLANT LEGENDSALVAGED DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH TO BEREUSEDPLANTING NOTESDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 10/13/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0006Z:\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0006 - Orchard Circle\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-102 Landscape Plan.dwg
ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:10/13/2025 1:58:18 PM
SUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
ADDITION
1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118
PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM10/13/20250110/13/2025 PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL 01 HERBACEOUS PLANTSALVAGED BRICK EDGER TO BE REUSEDLANDSCAPE DESIGN INSPIRATIONPLANT SCHEDULESYMBOL QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAMESIZESPACING O.C MATURE DIMENSIONSHERBACEOUS PLANTSNOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.SS 13 Little Bluestem/Schizachyrium scoparium #1 ContainerAS SHOWN 24"CA 6Karl Foerster/Calamagrostis acutiflora #3 ContainerAS SHOWN 30"LC 6Great Blue Lobelia/Lobelia siphilitica 4" ContainerAS SHOWN 3'LS 6Cardinal Flower/Lobelia cardinalis 4" ContainerAS SHOWN 3'RH 9Black-eyed Susan/Rudbeckia hirta4" ContainerAS SHOWN 3'1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE MULCHEDWITH 1 12" DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.1. PRIOR TO TREE STAKING AND PLANTING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONECALL (WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.COM OR 811) TO VERIFY UNDERGROUD UTILITIES. WHERE PRIVATEUTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THOSE LOCATED AS WELL.2. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK: ANSI Z60.1 LATEST EDITION.HTTP://AMERICANHORT.ORG/DOCUMENTS/ANSI NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS AMERICANHORT 2014.PDF3. NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CITY.4. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE FIELD REVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY TREE PROTECTION INSTALLATION.5. ALL TREE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIELDREVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOANY TREE INSTALLATION.6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE. NO PLANT MATERIAL IS TOBE LEFT OVERNIGHT ON THE PROJECT SITE WITHOUT BEING INSTALLED UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL BYCITY.7. IRRIGATION DESIGN TO COVER ALL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN AS IRRIGATED TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRGIATIONCONTRACTOR .8. PLANTING BEDS SHALL GET 3 INCHES OF SALVAGED 1 12 INCH DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.9. PLANTING BORDERS TO REUSE SALVAGED BRICK PAVERS, MATCH IF ADDITIONAL MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED.PHOTO BY RED STEM NATIVE LANDSCAPES, INC.Page 218 of 262
PRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHCONTAINER GROWN MATERIALS SHALL HAVE ROOTS HANDS LOOSENEDUPON PLANTING; PRUNE ANY DEAD OR DESICCATED ROOTSBACKFILL AROUND ROOTS WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.HOLE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED SUCH THAT ROOTS ARE VERTICAL ANDFULLY EXTENDED. SCARIFY BOTTOM OF PIT (6 IN. MIN.)SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE2 SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAILL-101 NOT TO SCALE3 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAILDRIP LINE OF TREE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE4 TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL4' HIGH SAFETY FENCE ATTACHED TO STEEL POSTS ATDRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED.SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLAN2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.18"4'L-103LANDSCAPE DETAILSDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 10/13/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0006Z:\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0006 - Orchard Circle\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-103 Landscape Details.dwg
ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:10/13/2025 1:58:15 PM
SUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
ADDITION
1122 ORCHARD CIRCLE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118
PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O.BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM10/13/20250110/13/2025 PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL 01
Page 219 of 262
A.) SIDING PER PLANB.) WINDOW PER PLANC.) 4" TRIM PER SPECA.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) SIDING PER PLAND.) 4" CORNER TRIM PER SPEC.B.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION38'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"6' STAIR W/ 7 34 " MAX. RISERS & 12"TREADS INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAIL WHEN MORETHAN 3 RISERS OR 30", BUILD STAIRS INTO PORCHEXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION28'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"8'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"EXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES15'-4 3/4"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION18'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"EXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES8'-1 1/2"8'-0"6'-10"11 1/2"8'-1 1/8"6'-8"10"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.'5$:,1*7,7/( ÄÄ/2&$7,21 3$*(3$*('(6&5,37,21 /'.+66(+0&'5+)0%1//.+66(+0"*16/#+.%1/ÄÄ9+056'&/0&855(17'$7( 5(9,6,21 5(9'$7( #..2.#05 &'5+)055*190#4'6*'2412'46;1(.+66(+0&'5+)075'1(6*'5'2.#0510#0;16*'4241,'%6.1616*'46*#0016'&106*+56+6.'$.1%-9+6*1766*'94+66'0%105'061(.+66(+0&'5+)0+5241*+$+6'&6*+52.#02418+&'5$7+.&+0)&'6#+.5(14#241,'%661$'$7+.6+0#%%14�%'9+6*+06'40#6+10#.$7+.&+0)%1&'5#59'..#5#0;.1%#.%1&'5%1064#%614190'4#0&1464#&'5#4'4'52105+$.'(14#0;(+0'52'0#.6+'5(14%1&'14&+0#0%'4')7.#6+1014$7+.&+0)241%'558+1.#6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(141/+55+10514'44145/#&'&74+0)&'5+)0$+&&+0)14%105647%6+102*#5'5#0;#0&#..5+6'4'8+'9+561$'2'4(14/'&$;16*'4557%*#56*'%1064#%614190'45748';141416*'464#&'54'52105+$.'(145+6'%10&+6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(14%1064#%61464#&''4414570-0190%1&'#&,756/'065#66*'6+/'1(2.#0%4'#6+1014%105647%6+10#241215'&'.'8#6+1055%#.'&24+06":Page 220 of 262
A.) SIDING PER PLANB.) WINDOW PER PLANC.) 4" TRIM PER SPECA.) 8" FASCIA PER SPEC.C.) SIDING PER PLAND.) 4" CORNER TRIM PER SPEC.B.) VENTILATED SOFFIT AT OVERHANGSSCREENBY OTHERSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION W/ SCREEN PORCH38" FRIEZE PER SPEC.14" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.SCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERS6' STAIR W/ 7 34 " MAX. RISERS & 12"TREADS INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAIL WHEN MORETHAN 3 RISERS OR 30", BUILD STAIRS INTO PORCHEXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES12" TRIM OVER RIM BOARD8" FASCIA PER SPEC.5:12 INTERIORVAULT PITCH8'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"12" TRIM OVER RIM BOARD-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION W/ SCREEN PORCH2SCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSSCREENBY OTHERSEXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES8'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"8'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"15'-4 3/4"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION18'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"EXISTING AREATO REMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES8'-1 1/2"8'-0"6'-10"11 1/2"8'-1 1/8"6'-8"10"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.'5$:,1*7,7/( ÄÄ/2&$7,21 3$*(3$*('(6&5,37,21 /'.+66(+0&'5+)0%1//.+66(+0"*16/#+.%1/ÄÄ9+056'&/0&855(17'$7( 5(9,6,21 5(9'$7( #..2.#05 &'5+)055*190#4'6*'2412'46;1(.+66(+0&'5+)075'1(6*'5'2.#0510#0;16*'4241,'%6.1616*'46*#0016'&106*+56+6.'$.1%-9+6*1766*'94+66'0%105'061(.+66(+0&'5+)0+5241*+$+6'&6*+52.#02418+&'5$7+.&+0)&'6#+.5(14#241,'%661$'$7+.6+0#%%14�%'9+6*+06'40#6+10#.$7+.&+0)%1&'5#59'..#5#0;.1%#.%1&'5%1064#%614190'4#0&1464#&'5#4'4'52105+$.'(14#0;(+0'52'0#.6+'5(14%1&'14&+0#0%'4')7.#6+1014$7+.&+0)241%'558+1.#6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(141/+55+10514'44145/#&'&74+0)&'5+)0$+&&+0)14%105647%6+102*#5'5#0;#0&#..5+6'4'8+'9+561$'2'4(14/'&$;16*'4557%*#56*'%1064#%614190'45748';141416*'464#&'54'52105+$.'(145+6'%10&+6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(14%1064#%61464#&''4414570-0190%1&'#&,756/'065#66*'6+/'1(2.#0%4'#6+1014%105647%6+10#241215'&'.'8#6+1059+6*(7674'5%4''0214%*5%#.'&24+06":Page 221 of 262
-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIEREXISTING FOOTING,VERIFY LOCATION &CONDITION IN FIELDNEW SPREAD FOOTING PER FOUNDATION PLANEXISTING BSMT.FLOOR TOREMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGESEXISTING 1STFLOOR TOREMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGESEXISTING 2NDFLOOR TOREMAIN AS IS-NO CHANGES-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINT1'-1 1/4"HEELHEIGHTR-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATIONW/ PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)GRADEBEYOND3'-4"6"5'-3"4'-3"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"10"NEW 2X10 JOISTS PER PLANNEW 2X10 JOISTS PER PLANEXISTING 10" FLOOR SYSTEMEXISTING 10" FLOOR SYSTEMMIN. R-49ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.EXISTING ROOFSYSTEMEXISTING FRAMED WALLEXISTING FRAMED WALLEXISTING FRAMED WALLNEW FLUSH BEAMPER PLAN6"MIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMWALL LINEBEYONDWALL LINEBEYOND8'-1 1/2"8'-0"6'-10"11 1/2"6"8'-1 1/8"6'-8"10"6&$/(
6(&7,217+528*+$'',7,21 (;,67,1*+20(START OF NEW &END OF EXISTINGCONCRETE SLABINSTALL SOLID BLOCKINGAT FACE OF BEAM TOCONNECT JOISTS TOINSTALL HANGER AT FACEOF BEAM FOR JOIST SUPPORT8'-5 1/2"6"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"11 1/2"1'-0"HEELHEIGHTWALL LINESBEYONDMIN. R-49ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.NEW 2X10 JOISTS PER PLANMIN. R-20MIN. R-20-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINTMIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATIONW/ PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)R-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIOR6&$/(
6(&7,217+528*+$'',7,21R-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATIONW/ PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)INSTALL SOFFIT AS REQ.FOR DUCTWORK'5$:,1*7,7/( ÄÄ/2&$7,21 3$*(3$*('(6&5,37,21 /'.+66(+0&'5+)0%1//.+66(+0"*16/#+.%1/ÄÄ9+056'&/0&855(17'$7( 5(9,6,21 5(9'$7( #..2.#05 &'5+)055*190#4'6*'2412'46;1(.+66(+0&'5+)075'1(6*'5'2.#0510#0;16*'4241,'%6.1616*'46*#0016'&106*+56+6.'$.1%-9+6*1766*'94+66'0%105'061(.+66(+0&'5+)0+5241*+$+6'&6*+52.#02418+&'5$7+.&+0)&'6#+.5(14#241,'%661$'$7+.6+0#%%14�%'9+6*+06'40#6+10#.$7+.&+0)%1&'5#59'..#5#0;.1%#.%1&'5%1064#%614190'4#0&1464#&'5#4'4'52105+$.'(14#0;(+0'52'0#.6+'5(14%1&'14&+0#0%'4')7.#6+1014$7+.&+0)241%'558+1.#6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(141/+55+10514'44145/#&'&74+0)&'5+)0$+&&+0)14%105647%6+102*#5'5#0;#0&#..5+6'4'8+'9+561$'2'4(14/'&$;16*'4557%*#56*'%1064#%614190'45748';141416*'464#&'54'52105+$.'(145+6'%10&+6+105.+66(+0&'5+)0+50164'52105+$.'(14%1064#%61464#&''4414570-0190%1&'#&,756/'065#66*'6+/'1(2.#0%4'#6+1014%105647%6+10&$7+.&+0)5'%6+1055%#.'&24+06":Page 222 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
9.c
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-73 Approving the application of Cobalt Business Center,
LLC for a CUP for a metal manufacturing use and associated outdoor
storage of building systems equipment at the property located at 1315
Mendota Heights Road (Planning Case No. 2025-20)
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community
Development Manager
ACTION REQUEST:
Adopt Resolution 2025-73 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for a metal manufacturing use
and accessory outdoor storage for Cobalt Business Center at 1315 Mendota Heights Road.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant (Cobalt Business Center LLC) requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) to allow a metal manufacturing use and accessory outdoor storage on the site. Both
uses are listed Conditional Uses within the I – Industrial zoning district. The subject property is
located within the Mendota Heights Industrial Park plat and is approximately 10.12 acres in
size. This property was previously home to Le Cordon Bleu cooking school, and had been
vacant since 2017 until the current construction of a new 174,288 sq-ft. building. The building
permit was issued for this redevelopment project in summer 2025, and future permits are
expected for the build-out of the proposed tenant.
The proposed operation under this CUP request involves aerospace manufacturing processes.
As part of these processes, metal work will be a component of the manufacturing use which
requires CUP approval. In addition to the principal manufacturing use, the prospective tenant
requires a 12,500 sq-ft. outdoor storage area for building systems equipment necessary for the
manufacturing processes. Accessory outdoor storage requests also require a CUP approval.
The applicant has indicated that the facility will incorporate modern manufacturing processes
and rely on both robotics and automation to create the specialized metal parts and
components. All of the manufacturing processes will be conducted within the enclosed
building. Sight line graphics have also been provided, which illustrate that the outdoor storage
area and its equipment will be screened due to the height of the building and the distance
from public right-of-way and street view. The site has been reviewed for adequate access,
Page 223 of 262
utilities, stormwater management, and compliance with City performance standards as part of
the building permit issuance, and the new information of the proposed tenant is consistent
with the anticipated Industrial use of the site.The property is located within the Mendota
Heights Industrial Park and surrounded primarily by industrially zoned properties. The
redevelopment replaces a long-vacant site with a new, modern industrial facility that will
enhance the overall quality and functionality of the district. The proposed use is compatible
with the surrounding area and is not anticipated to negatively affect property values. The
proposed tenant is also estimated to add 200 skilled jobs to the workforce of the City. Staff
finds that the proposed project is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
City Code and Comprehensive Plan.
At the October 28, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, a planning report was presented. A
duly noticed public hearing was held, and no residents came forward to speak relating to this
application. The applicant was present and available to answer questions of the Commission.
A copy of the 10/28/2025 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the
unapproved minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff
recommended approval of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning
Commission affirmed the staff recommendation and voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend
to the City Council approval of this CUP with findings-of-fact and certain conditions, as
outlined in the attached [draft] Resolution.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
n/a
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2025-73 Approving a CUP for a metal manufacturing use and accessory
outdoor storage for Cobalt Business Center at 1315 Mendota Hts Rd
2.Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes 10-28-25
3.Planning Commission Staff Report 10-28-25
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy
Page 224 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-73 Page | 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-73
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A METAL
MANUFACTURING USE AND ACCESSORY OUTDOOR STORAGE
AT 1315 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
PLANNING CASE 2025-20
WHEREAS, Cobalt Business Center, LLC, (the “Applicant and Owner”) made an
Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a metal manufacturing use and accessory outdoor
storage at 1315 Mendota Heights Road, and legally described in Exhibit A (the “Subject
Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided I-Industrial in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
and zoned I-Industrial; and
WHEREAS, Title 12-3B-1 of the City Code allows certain manufacturing and outdoor
storage uses by Conditional Use Permit in the Industrial District, and the proposed use is consistent
with the performance standards of the zoning district and City Code; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit request, whereby planning reports were presented
and received by the Commission, and comments from the applicant and public were allowed, and
whereupon closing the hearing, the Commission recommended unanimously (6-0 vote) to approve
the request from Cobalt Business Center for the Conditional Use Permit, which would allow the
proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage uses, as proposed and presented
under Planning Case No. 2025-20, with certain conditions and findings-of-fact to support said
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that
the recommendation from the Planning Commission on Planning Case No. 2025-20 is hereby
affirmed, and may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact:
1.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use is compatible
with the approved building permit for a new industrial speculative office/warehouse
facility, and the proposed uses are listed Conditional Uses in the I-Industrial zoning
district.
2.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor will cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor depreciate surrounding property values.
Page 225 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-73 Page | 2
3.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use conforms to the
general purpose and intent of this code and comprehensive plan, including all
applicable performance standards, provided all conditions are met and upheld by the
property owner and applicant.
4.With the conditions included herein, the site will provide adequate parking for the
proposed use and existing building. All parking will be accommodated on-site and no
adverse impacts off-site are anticipated to traffic flow on the surrounding roadway
network.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the
Conditional Use Permit requested for the property located at 1315 Mendota Heights Road is hereby
approved, with the following conditions:
1.The Applicant/Developer must obtain a building permit for all new remodeling or
interior work (including building, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling and other
related site work prior to any work associated with this land use approval commencing
on site.
2.A revised parking plan shall be submitted at the time of the tenant build-out permit to
confirm that parking demand is met.
3.All grading and construction activity must be in compliance with applicable federal,
state, and local regulations and codes, as well as in compliance with the City’s Land
Disturbance Guidance Document.
4.Any expansion of the outdoor storage area or metal manufacturing use must be
reviewed and approved by City staff for local code and ordinance compliance, and may
require an Amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of November 2025.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 226 of 262
Resolution No. 2025-73 Page | 3
EXHIBIT A
Address: 1315 Mendota Heights Road
PIN: 27-48300-01-061
Legal Description:
Real property in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, Dakota County, Minnesota.
AND
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTIRAL PARK, lying South of the Easterly
extension of the South line of Lot 5, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, through Lot 7 to
the East line of said Lot 7, Dakota County, Minnesota
Abstract
Page 227 of 262
DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EXCERPT FROM DRAFT/UNAPPROVED 10/28/25 PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
B) PLANNING CASE 2025-20
COBALT BUSINESS CENTER, LLC, 1315 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD –
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that the subject property located at
1315 Mendota Heights Road is owned by Cobalt Business Center LLC. The applicant requests
approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow metal manufacturing and outdoor storage
on the site. Both uses are listed as conditional uses within the I-Industrial zoning district. The
outdoor storage component will be accessory to the principal manufacturing use. The building is
currently under construction and was initially designed as an office/warehouse use shell to be
speculative for a future tenant. This manufacturing user will occupy the entirety of the 174,288
square foot building and will be subject to a future building permit for the build-out of the user.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a
presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the
City’s website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Commissioner Corbett asked if infrastructure is always counted as outdoor storage.
Community Development Director Sarah Madden replied that it can and explained that
mechanical equipment is called out as an outdoor storage component that would need to be
screened. She stated that there would be numerous pieces of equipment, which is why this is
considered outdoor storage.
Chair Field invited the applicant to speak.
Evan Matson, applicant, presented project highlights and information on the potential client, who
is confidential at this time and is seeking to occupy the entire building they are working to
construct. He provided additional information on aerial and existing conditions, zoning and use,
proposed uses, outdoor storage for building systems equipment, and asked that the Commission
consider approval of the request.
Chair Field opened the public hearing.
Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public
hearing.
Page 228 of 262
DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A METAL
MANUFACTURING USE AND ACCESSORY OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR COBALT BUSINESS
CENTER AT 1315 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT FOR
APPROVAL, AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1.THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER MUST OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT FOR ALL NEW
REMODELING OR INTERIOR WORK (INCLUDING BUILDING, ELECTRICAL,
PLUMBING, HEATING/COOLING), AND OTHER RELATED SITE WORK PRIOR TO
ANY WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS LAND USE APPROVAL COMMENCING ON
SITE.
2.A REVISED PARKING PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE TENANT
BUILD-OUT PERMIT TO CONFIRM THAT PARKING DEMAND IS MET.
3.ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL
AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE
DOCUMENT.
4.ANY EXPANSION OF THE OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA OR METAL
MANUFACTURING USE MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CITY STAFF
FOR LOCAL CODE AND ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE, AND MAY REQUIRE AN
AMENDMENT TO THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its November 5, 2025,
meeting.
Page 229 of 262
4.b
Planning Commission
Meeting Date: October 28, 2025
Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-20 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Application of Cobalt
Business Center, LLC for a CUP for a metal manufacturing use and
associated outdoor storage of building systems equipment at the property
located at 1315 Mendota Heights Road
Department: Community
Development
Contact: Sarah Madden,
Community Development
Manager
Introduction:
The subject property located at 1315 Mendota Heights Road is owned by Cobalt Business
Center LLC. The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow
metal manufacturing and outdoor storage on the site. Both uses are listed Conditional Uses
within the I – Industrial zoning district. The outdoor storage component will be accessory to the
principal manufacturing use. The building is currently under construction and was initially
designed as an office/warehouse use shell to be speculative for a future tenant. This
manufacturing user will occupy the entirety of the 174,288-sq.ft. building and will be subject to
a future building permit for the build-out of the user.
A public hearing notice for this planning item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice
letters were mailed to all properties within 350-feet of the subject property. The city has not
received any comments or objections to this land use request as of the submittal of this report.
Background:
The subject property is located within the Mendota Heights Industrial Park plat and is
approximately 440,986 square feet (10.12 acres) in size. The site previously consisted of two
parcels within the Mendota Heights Industrial Park plat. As a condition of receiving a building
permit for redevelopment, the applicant worked with Dakota County to combine the parcels
into a single active parcel, ensuring conformance with subdivision and building requirements.
The site fronts two public streets—Mendota Heights Road to the south and Enterprise Drive to
the west. The surrounding land uses and zoning are I-Industrial to the north, east, and west,
and B-1 General Business/B-Business to the south across Mendota Heights Road.
The site was previously home to the Le Cordon Bleu culinary school, which closed in 2017
and the prior building remained vacant since the school’s closure. In the last few years, the
prior owners of the property demolished the interior features of the building and left the
structure as a shell.
The City was approached early in 2025 about the property by Endeavor Development (the
owner and representative of Cobalt Business Center, LLC). Endeavor shared plans to fully
demolish the building and proceed with a redevelopment of the site with an office/warehouse
industrial building. The building permit for the new structure was issued this summer for a
Page 230 of 262
174,288-sq.ft. industrial building designed as a speculative office/warehouse shell. At that
time, a tenant was not secured. The building is currently under construction.
The new development maintains the existing drive aisle access points, including one driveway
access from Mendota Heights Road serving the primary building entrance, and a second
access from Enterprise Drive to the west serving the rear loading area. As part of the
approved permit, the developer relocated and will reconstruct the site’s existing stormwater
pond to the west side of the property. A Forest Alteration Permit was also issued for the
removal of the site’s prior landscaping features from the first development in 2004-2005. This
work was approved by City staff with the building permit, and the stormwater ponding was
reviewed by the City Council for the vacation of the prior drainage and utility easement and the
approved re-dedication of the new stormwater pond boundaries.
Proposed Tenant and Use
Cobalt Business Center LLC has secured a metal manufacturing user that will occupy the
entire 174,288-sq.ft. building. The future tenant will be subject to a building permit for the
interior build-out to accommodate the manufacturing use, including equipment installation,
interior improvements, and office space. This would have been the case for any tenant
occupying the space once the building shell was complete.
The proposed operation involves aerospace manufacturing processes. As part of these
processes, metal work will be a component of the manufacturing use. The Table of Uses in
12-3B-1 of City Code identifies certain manufacturing uses as a Conditional Use In the I-
Industrial zoning district. Specifically, manufacturing conducted within a completely enclosed
building are considered a permitted use, except for processes involving one or more of the
following:
“Batteries, laundries, metal polishing and plating, paper products from previously processed
paper, rubber and synthetic rubber products, sheet metal work, ornamental iron, welding,
stamping”.
The tenant remains a confidential client, however the proposed use will incorporate metal
work as part of the manufacturing processes. The applicant has indicated that the facility will
incorporate modern manufacturing processes and rely on both robotics and automation to
create the specialized metal parts and components. All of the manufacturing processes will be
conducted within the enclosed building. The applicant has also indicated that the business will
generate an estimated 200 skilled jobs within the community.
In addition to the Conditional Use for metal manufacturing, the applicant is also requesting
accessory outdoor storage component to accommodate building systems functions of the use.
Accessory outdoor storage is a listed Conditional Use in the I-Industrial District. The applicant
is proposing 12,500 sq-ft. of area north of the building to support the manufacturing processes
occurring within the building. The equipment includes two (2) silos, one (1) process gas
system, one (1) cooler classifier, and two (2) dust collectors. The applicant illustrates that the
storage area will be located adjacent to the rear building wall (Shown in the attached Exhibit
B). The area will be screened by the building to the south, and tree plantings provide
screening to the north and east. To the west towards the drive aisle entrance, additional trees
will be planted surrounding the north end of the stormwater pond, and a change in grade aids
in screening the storage area from public view at the property line. The outdoor storage area
is proposed to be setback approximately 83-ft from the closest property line. The applicant has
also provided graphics to illustrate the sight lines from Mendota Heights Road and Enterprise
Drive, which provides perspective on how the combination of building and site features will
accommodate screening requirements.
Page 231 of 262
Parking
The approved site plan includes 183 off-street parking stalls, including required accessible
spaces, located along the south and east sides of the building. When the building permit was
issued, parking requirements were calculated for the speculative office/warehouse use,
resulting in a requirement of 177 stalls—a total that is met by the approved plan.
With the identification of a metal manufacturing tenant, parking needs differ from those of a
general warehouse. Based on the base manufacturing use standard of:
4 spaces, and;
1 space per 800 sq. ft. of manufacturing area, and;
1 space per 2,500 sq. ft. of outdoor storage area,
the site would require approximately 202 parking spaces for just the manufacturing use, an
increase of 19 spaces from what was previously approved.
The site provides adequate flexibility to address this potential increase. Once the interior build-
out plan for this tenant identifies the final space distribution of manufacturing, office, and
storage space, the final parking requirement can be confirmed. Should additional parking be
needed, the site includes sufficient undeveloped area within the maximum impervious surface
limits of the I – Industrial district to accommodate future parking expansion. Additionally, since
the original parking space layout was designed with a drive-in truck ramp and several loading
bays, there is additional area within the rear of the property where parking spaces could be
laid out as this tenant would not have a need for the full extent of loading and distribution
space.
Staff does not anticipate parking conflicts, given the size of the property, the expected
staggered work shifts for manufacturing operations, and available expansion area. Staff
recommends including a condition requiring a revised parking plan be submitted at the time of
the tenant build-out permit to confirm that parking demand is met.
Analysis:
Pursuant to Title 12-5B-5, the city recognizes that the development and execution of Zoning
Code is based upon the division of the city into districts within which regulations are specified.
It is further recognized that there are special or conditional uses which, because of their
unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without
consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public
need for the particular location.
To provide for these needs, the city may approve a conditional use for those uses and
purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to ensure that the
purpose and intent of this chapter is effectively carried out.
The City may grant a conditional use provided the proposed use demonstrates the following:
a. Use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community,
b. Use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
c. Use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value, and
d. Use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the
comprehensive plan.
a-c) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of
the community; will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; nor depreciate
Page 232 of 262
surrounding property value.
Staff Response:
The proposed manufacturing operations will occur entirely within the enclosed building. The
outdoor storage area will be screened from public view and located behind the structure,
minimizing any potential visual or operational impacts. The applicant has provided sight line
graphics which illustrate that the outdoor storage area and its equipment will be screened due
to the height of the building and the distance from public right-of-way and street view. The site
has been reviewed for adequate access, utilities, stormwater management, and compliance
with City performance standards as part of the building permit issuance, and the new
information of the proposed tenant is consistent with the anticipated Industrial use of the site.
The site maintains existing drive aisles and access points from Mendota Heights Road and
Enterprise Drive. Adequate truck circulation and loading areas are provided at the rear of the
property, separate from employee and visitor parking areas. The anticipated traffic generation
for the proposed use is consistent with other industrial operations in the area and staff does
not anticipate any conflicts with internal circulation or adjacent roadways. The property is
located within the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and surrounded primarily by industrially
zoned properties. The redevelopment replaces a long-vacant site with a new, modern
industrial facility that will enhance the overall quality and functionality of the district. The
proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area and is not anticipated to negatively
affect property values. The proposed tenant is also estimated to add 200 skilled jobs to the
workforce of the City.
d) The proposed use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the city code and
comprehensive plan, including all applicable performance standards, so as not to be in
conflict on an on-going basis.
Staff Response:
The site is zoned I – Industrial and guided Industrial under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The
proposed use supports the City’s goals for employment, economic vitality, and reinvestment
within the established industrial park. The project conforms to all applicable zoning standards,
including building setbacks, height, landscaping, and screening.
Chapter 2: Land Use and Growth of the Plan provides the following goal statement:
Goal 3: Encourage and support industrial and commercial development in designated
areas.
Chapter 6: Economic Development of the plan provides the following goal statement and
policies:
Goal 1: Promote Economic Development in Mendota Heights through a comprehensive
approach to meeting business needs.
Policy 3. Attract quality businesses consistent with the city’s target market to areas
available for development.
Goal 5: Continue to develop business and industrial park areas that provide jobs and serve
the local and regional economy.
Policies:
1. Provide opportunities for new industrial development and expanded employment
opportunities to create livable-wage positions in Mendota Heights and the
redevelopment of existing industrial uses to serve existing businesses in the community.
2. Provide attractive, planned environments as a means to induce employers to locate
within the city.
3. Continue to provide and enforce standards for industrial developments that improve
the appearance and character of industrial properties.
4. Provide high quality public services and infrastructure in all commercial and industrial
districts.
Page 233 of 262
Staff believes the proposed project is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
City Code and Comprehensive Plan that encourages investment within the industrial areas.
This improvement is compatible with the spirit and intent of the Industrial Zoning District and
provides commercial reinvestment in an existing industrial site.
Alternatives:
1. Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for 1315 Mendota Heights Road
based on certain findings-of-fact, along with specific conditions of approval; or
2. Recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for 1315 Mendota Heights Road
based on revised findings-of-fact supporting such a recommendation as determined by
the Planning Commission; or
3. Table the request and request more information from staff and/or the applicant. Staff
will extend the application review period an additional 60-days, pursuant to MN State
Statute 15.99.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use
Permit for a metal manufacturing use and accessory outdoor storage for Cobalt Business
Center at 1315 Mendota Heights Road, based on the attached findings-of-fact for approval
and with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant/Developer must obtain a building permit for all new remodeling or interior
work (including building, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling and other related site
work prior to any work associated with this land use approval commencing on site.
2. A revised parking shall plan be submitted at the time of the tenant build-out permit to
confirm that parking demand is met.
3. All grading and construction activity must be in compliance with applicable federal,
state, and local regulations and codes, as well as in compliance with the City’s Land
Disturbance Guidance Document.
4. Any expansion of the outdoor storage area or metal manufacturing use must be
reviewed and approved by City staff for local code and ordinance compliance, and may
require an Amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.
Attachments:
1. Findings of Fact for Approval
2. Site Location Map
3. Narrative Letter
4. Exhibit A Proposed Uses
5. Exhibit B Outdoor Storage Area
6. Screening Graphics - Outdoor Storage Area
7. C-1.0 - 1315 Mendota Heights Road - Existing Conditions 6-16-25
8. C-3.0 - Cobalt Business Center Site Plan
9. C-4.1- Cobalt Business Center Erosion Control Plan
10. C-4.0- Cobalt Business Center Grading Plan
11. C-5.0- Cobalt Business Center Utility Plan
12. Cobalt Business Center Landscape Plan Set
13. Cobalt Business Center Circulation and Truck Movements
Page 234 of 262
14.Cobalt Business Center Photometric Plan
15.A200 - Cobalt Business Center Shell Plan
16.A300 - Cobalt Business Center Exterior Elevations
Page 235 of 262
Planning Case 2025-20 (CUP for 1315 Mendota Heights Road)
Page 1 of 2
FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL
CUP – Conditional Use Permit
for
1315 Mendota Heights Road
The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests:
1.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use is compatible with the
approved building permit for a new industrial speculative office/warehouse facility, and the
proposed use s are listed Conditional Uses in the I-Industrial zoning district.
2.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor will cause serious traffic congestion nor
hazards, nor depreciate surrounding property values.
3.The proposed metal manufacturing and accessory outdoor storage use conforms to the general
purpose and intent of this code and comprehensive plan, including all applicable performance
standards, provided all conditions are met and upheld by the property owner and applicant.
4.With the conditions included herein, the site will provide adequate parking for the proposed use
and existing building. All parking will be accommodated on-site and no adverse impacts off-site
are anticipated to traffic flow on the surrounding roadway network.
Page 236 of 262
Planning Case 2025-20 (CUP for 1315 Mendota Heights Road)
Page 2 of 2
Page 237 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 6 66666666
66
6666666666666666
666666666666666666666666
!!!!
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
!
!
!
!
!
!
"
"
""
""
³
!
!
*
*
!!
³
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
*!
**³³
³"
"
*
"³
³
³
""
³
³
³
³
³!*
³ ³
³
"
!
³
"
"""
"
"
"
""""
"
!
!!6666666666666666666FMFM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM F M FM
FM FM666!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2
!!2!!2!!2!!2!!2
!!2
!!2
!.
!.
!.
1315 2475
2425
1255
2444
1335
1300 13101340
2440
1333
2425
12851295
1345 ENTERPRISE DRMENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
Nearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN
Site Location/Aerial MapCobalt Business Center1315 Mendota Heights Road
Date: 10/24/2025
City ofMendotaHeights0210
SCALE IN FEET
GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights.
Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation.
Page 238 of 262
October 13th, 2025
Sarah Madden
Community Development Manager
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Site Address: 1315 Mendota Heights Road, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (“Cobalt Business
Center”)
Zoning: Industrial
RE: Conditional Use Permit Application Narrative and Response Statement
A confldential client is seeking to relocate its operations (referred to as “Project Hot”) to
Cobalt Business Center to modernize its aerospace manufacturing processes. Project Hot
is seeking to make a long-term investment into a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility that
will generate over 200 skilled jobs within the community. To accommodate Project Hot’s
operational needs, Cobalt Business Center, LLC is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
(“CUP”) at Cobalt Business Center for:
1.Manufacturing use, conducted within a completely enclosed building for
metal work
2.12,500 square feet (0.29 acres) of outdoor storage to house building systems
equipment required by the advanced manufacturing processes.
Description of Proposed Use
Project Hot will occupy the entire 174,228 square feet of Cobalt Business Center. The state-
of-the-art facility will feature a combination of office and manufacturing uses as depicted in
Exhibit A. The modern manufacturing processes will rely heavily upon robotics and
Page 239 of 262
automation to create specialized metallic parts. The manufacturing processes will be
conducted entirely within an enclosed building.
Description of Outdoor Storage Area
Project Hot operationally requires 12,500 square feet (0.29 acres) of outdoor storage for
building systems equipment (“Outdoor Storage Area”). The equipment will support
manufacturing processes occurring within the building. The equipment includes, but is not
limited to, two (2) silos, one (1) process gas system, one (1) cooler classifler and two (2) dust
collectors.
The Outdoor Storage Area is proposed to be located up against the rear building wall. The
area is screened from all adjacent roadways and property lines. The building provides
screening to the south and onsite trees provide screening to the north, south and west. The
Outdoor Storage Area would be set back 83 feet from the closest property line. The Outdoor
Storage Area is depicted in Exhibit B.
Response Statement to Standards
Project Hot at Cobalt Business Center would be a long-term asset that would bring many
beneflts to the Mendota Heights community. The beneflts included bolstering the tax base,
creating over 200 skilled jobs and increasing foot traffic to neighboring businesses.
1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare
of the community.
Project Hot prioritizes the health and safety of its employees and community
members. Project Hot will comply with all municipal, environmental and regulatory
compliance standards.
2. The proposed use will not cause serious traffic congestion
Cobalt Business Center and the surrounding roadways feature infrastructure that is
designed to handle Project Hot’s traffic requirements. Project Hot once fully
operational will have 200 full-time employees spread across multiple shifts. Traffic
will primarily be from passenger vehicles. Truck deliveries and pickups will be
minimal and concentrated around the morning and evenings.
3. The proposed use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value.
Cobalt Business Center has revitalized a site that had sat vacant for many years. The
infiux of capital has increased the value of surrounding properties. Project Hot’s
continued investment will only continue to amplify values.
Page 240 of 262
4.The proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City
Code and the comprehensive plan
Project Hot’s manufacturing use is consistent with the intent of the City Code and
comprehensive plan. The use will continue to drive economic growth and generate
jobs within the City’s Industrial district.
The proposed use also aligns with the character of adjacent properties. Tempco,
Tivoli Too and EDM Electri-Cord are examples of manufacturing users located on
adjacent properties with industrial zoning.
We appreciate your consideration of our application and look forward to working with the
City of Mendota Heights on Project Hot’s Conditional Use Permit approval.
Page 241 of 262
Exhibit A
Proposed Uses
Page 242 of 262
Exhibit B
Outdoor Storage Area
Size: 12,500 sq. ft. / 0.29 Acres
Dimensions: 250’ x 50’
Setbacks: 83’ from northern property line
Equipment List: Two (2) Silos (45’ H, 15’D)
Two (2) Dust Collectors (45’ H, 40’ L, 15’ W)
One (1) Process Gas System (20’ H, 8’ L, 8’ W)
One (1) Cooler Classifler (10’ H, 8’ L, 6’ W)
One (1) Process Gas Tank (13’ H, 15’ L, 10’ W)
Page 243 of 262
ENDEAVOR DEVELOPMENT
Screening from Mendota Heights Road
VIEW 1
VIEW 2
OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA
50’
45’
OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA
50’
45’
Page 244 of 262
ENDEAVOR DEVELOPMENT
Screening from Enterprise Drive
VIEW 3
250’
45’
OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA
Page 245 of 262
85485685886086286486686886686888
2
8
8
0
8
7
8
876874
8
7
2
87
08688668648
6
28608588
5
6
8
5
4852 848
850
852
854
856 858
860
84
8
85
0
85
2
85
4
85
6
85
8
86
0
862
864864
862862862852860850
8
5
0 870870872874
876 878880882884886890892874876878880882884868
864
862
860
866866866
N89°52'24"E 881.26 N0°11'53"W 500.03N89°52'24"E 888.46
N0°15'16"W 423.94R=434.70
L=76.50
Δ=10°04'59"
C.Brg=N5°17'45"W
C=76.40
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSITE
C-1.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SETEXISTING CONDITIONS733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
Lot 6, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, Dakota County, Minnesota.
AND
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, lying South of the Easterly
extension of the South line of Lot 5, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK, through Lot 7
to the East line of said Lot 7, Dakota County, Minnesota.
(Abstract Property)
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
1.Monuments placed (or a reference monument or witness to the corner) at all major corners of the
boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or
witnesses to the corner are shown hereon.
2.Address of the property is 1315 Mendota Heights Road and indicated on map.
3.The property lies within Zone X (unshaded - areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual
chance floodplain) of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance
Community Panel No. 27037C0081E, effective December 2, 2011.
4.The area of the above described property is 440,946 square feet or 10.123 acres.
5.Contour lines depicted hereon are based on ground measurements and referenced to North
American Vertical Datum of 1988(NAVD88). Benchmark: Top nut of Hydrant located at the
southeast corner of subject property and has a elevation of 882.97 ft.
6(a). No zoning information provided.
7(a). Exterior dimensions of all buildings are shown at ground level.
8.Substantial features observed in the process of conducting fieldwork, are shown hereon.
9.There are 524 regular parking stalls and 13 handicapped parking stalls on site.
11(a). The locations of existing public utilities on or serving the property are depicted based on Gopher
State One Call Ticket Nos. 250761178 & 250761125, available city maps, records and observed
evidence locations. Lacking excavation, underground utility locations may not be exact. Verify
critical utilities prior to construction or design
13.Names of adjoining owners are depicted based on Dakota County GIS tax information.
16.There was no observed evidence of earth moving work or building construction at the time of our
field work.
17.We are not aware of any proposed changes in street right of way lines or observable evidence of
recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs.
TABLE A ITEMS
The following are survey related exceptions set forth in Schedule B, Part II of the herein referenced Title
Commitment:
Item No. 12:Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of Mendota Heights Industrial Park,
recorded July 22, 1969, as Document No. 363029. Depicted on survey.
NOTE: As evidenced by Declaration Vacating Private Easements dated October 3, 1978, recorded
January 9, 1979, as Document No. 529936, all railway easements shown on the plat which were
not dedicated as a public easement were vacated.
Item No. 13:Declaration of Covenants by Northland Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, dated October
31, 1978, recorded December 21, 1978, as Document No. 528779. Affects property; not
plottable.
As amended by Amended, Extended and Restated Declaration of Covenants dated July 31, 1987,
recorded August 6, 1987, as Document No. 799509. As affected by Waiver Letter dated May 3,
2004, recorded November 17, 2004, as Document No. 2268025. Affects property; not plottable.
Item No. 14:Declaration of Covenants by The Northland Company, a Minnesota corporation, dated December
23, 1986, recorded January 15, 1987, as Document No. 762195.
As amended by Amended, Extended and Restated Declaration of Covenants dated July 31, 1987,
recorded August 6, 1987, as Document No. 799509. Affects property; not plottable.
Item No. 15:Easement for drainage and utility for storm water purposes, together with any incidental rights, in
favor of the City of Mendota Heights, a municipal corporation, as contained in the Easement
Agreement, dated October 15, 1996, recorded November 6, 1996, as Document No. 1386087.
Depicted on survey.
Item No. 16:Memorandum of Ground Lease Agreement by and between CEC Investment LLC, as Landlord,
and CEC Holdings LLC, as Tenant, dated September 30, 2004, recorded December 13, 2004, as
Document No. 2275506.
As affected by Limited Warranty Deed dated February 1, 2011, recorded May 3, 2011, as
Document No. 2798820. Affects property; not plottable.
Item No. 17:Terms, conditions, covenants, reservations, regulations and easements as contained in the Private
Water Main Agreement, dated March 22, 2005, recorded July 12, 2005, as Document No. 2338919.
Depicted on survey.
Item No. 18:Terms and conditions as contained in the Resolution No. 10-103, Approving a Conditional Use
Permit for a Restaurant and Cafe, recorded December 17, 2010, as Document No. 2773148.
Affects property; not plottable.
Item No. 19:Riparian rights of others in and to wetlands crossing or abutting premises. No wetland flags
were observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork.
SCHEDULE B, PART II EXCEPTIONS
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
1.This survey and the property description shown here on are based upon information found in the
commitment for title insurance prepared by First American Title Insurance Company National
Commercial Services, file no. NCS-1253903-MPLS, dated March 13, 2025.
2.The south line of Lot 6, Block 1, MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK is assumed to have a
bearing of N89°52'24"E
3.All distances are in feet.
4.The property has vehicular access to Mendota Heights Rd and Enterprise Dr, public rights of way, via
curb cuts.
NOTES
To Endeavor Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company and First American Title Insurance
Company National Commercial Services:
This is to Certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with
the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established
and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 7(a), 8, 9, 11(a), 13, 16 and 17 of
Table A thereof. The field work was completed on April 17, 2025.
Date of Plat or Map: __________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Daniel Ekrem, Professional Land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 57366
Email: dekrem@alliant-inc.com
CERTIFICATION
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
R Dial 811
0
SCALE IN FEET
25 50 100
N
Page 246 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER POND
PROPOSED BUILDING623' x 280'174,288 S.F.20' FRONT PARKING SETBACK40' YARD BUILDING SETBACK20' FRONT PARKING SETBACK40' YARD BUILDING SETBACK10' FRONT PARKING SETBACK
30' YARD BUILDING SETBACK 10' FRONT PARKING SETBACK50' YARD BUILDING SETBACKC-3.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTER
PERMIT SET
SITE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700Know what's below.Call before you dig.RDial 811SITE NOTES: SITE LEGEND: SITE DATA: Page 247 of 262
854856858860862864
866
868
866
868
8828808788
7
6
8
7
48728708
6
8
8
6
6
8
6
4862860858856854852 848850852854856858860848850852854856858860862864 864862862 862852860850850
870
870
8
7
2
8
7
4876
87
8
880
882
884
886
890
892
874
876
878
880
882
884 868864862860866 866 866STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED BUILDING623' x 280'174,288 S.F.850852852852852850848845856854852850848846845844846838844838
C-4.1COBALT BUSINESS CENTER
PERMIT SET
EROSION CONTROL PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND:Page 248 of 262
8548568588608628648668688668688
8
0
8
7
8
876874
8
7
2
87
08688668648
6
28608588
5
6
8
5
4852 848
850
852
854
856 858
860
84
8
85
0
85
2
85
4
85
6
85
8
86
0
862
864864
862862862852860850
8
5
0 870870872874
876 878880882884886890892874876878880882884868
864
862
860
866866866
N89°52'24"E 881.26 N0°11'53"W 500.03N89°52'24"E 888.46
N0°15'16"W 423.94R=434.70
L=76.50
Δ=10°04'59"
C.Brg=N5°17'45"W
C=76.40
STORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.850852852852852850848845856
854
852
850
848
846845844846838844
838
C-4.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SETGRADING PLAN733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
LEGEND:
GRADING NOTES:
EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE:
EROSION MAINTENANCE:
Page 249 of 262
STORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
C-5.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SETUTILITY PLAN733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
UTILITY NOTES:
LEGEND
STORM SEWER SCHEDULE:
(REFER TO PLAN VIEW FOR CB 4A)
Page 250 of 262
STORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.850852852852852850848845856
854
852
850
848
846845844846838844
838
L-1.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SETFOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
R Dial 811
REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS
LEGEND:
PLAN
NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED
TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. NO HEAVY EQUIPMENT
SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE.
ELEVATION
4' ORANGE SNOW FENCE WITH
POSTS 8' O.C. AT DRIP
LINE OF OUTER MOST
BRANCHES
DRIP LINE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
NO SCALE2
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES:
Page 251 of 262
L-1.1COBALT BUSINESS CENTER
PERMIT SET
TREE INVENTORY 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700Know what's below.Call before you dig.RDial 811Page 252 of 262
STORMWATER POND
PROPOSED BUILDING623' x 280'174,288 S.F.850852852852852850848845856854852850848846845844846838844838 3 - PO4 - BH3 - SL2 - BH1 - AP1 - RB1 - SW1 - RB1 - SW1 - RB1 - CH7 - BBH7 - BBH1 - AP4 - GLS9 - AWS4 - GLS3 - BBH3 - CH2 - RB2 - CH3 - SL1 - RB1 - PO1 - SW1 - SW8 - GFS6 - BBH9 - BMJ3 - BMJ11 - GFS18 - CLB8 - AFS8 - AFS8 - PBC8 - PBC7 - BMJ7 - GFS5 - BBH7 - BMJ5 - GFS1 - NF1 - NF1 - NF1 - NF1 - NF1 - NF3 - BF3 - AP3 - BF3 - BH3 - BF1 - SW1 - AE1 - AE1 - AE1 - SW6 - AWS4 - AWS7 - AWS7 - BMJ5 - BBH6 - HL4 - SB1 - SB1 - SB1 - SB1 - SB1 - SW1 - SB1 - PO1 - SW1 - PO1 - PO1 - PO3 - AE4 - AP4 - AWS7 - AWS6 - AB9 - PBC6 - GLS3 - GLS3 - GLSGRANITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERSTO BE POSITIONED INTO THEFACE OF SLOPE, APPROX. 30% OFBOULDER SHOULD BE BURIEDINSTALL "HYDROGROW" SOIL AMENDMENT (SUPPLIEDWITH GRASSPAVE2 SYSTEM) AND OVER SEED ORHYDROSEED WITH TURF SEED MIX, SEE LEGENDL-2.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTER
PERMIT SET
LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700Know what's below.Call before you dig.RDial 811LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS LEGEND LANDSCAPE NOTES: LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE Page 253 of 262
L-2.1COBALT BUSINESS CENTER
PERMIT SET
LANDSCAPE DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700Know what's below.Call before you dig.RDial 811L-2.14MULCH AT SIDEWALKNOT TO SCALENOTES:1. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NOTES FORCOLOR AND TYPE OF MULCH.CONCRETE SIDEWALK2" MIN.MULCH TO BE LEVEL AT SIDEWALKMULCH SEE NOTES4" TYP.PLANTING SOILDEPTH VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTESFILTER FABRICMIRAFI OR EQUALL-2.15MULCH AT SODNOT TO SCALENOTES:1. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NOTES FORCOLOR AND TYPE OF MULCH.SOD2" MIN.POLY EDGINGMULCH SEE NOTES4" TYP.PLANTING SOILDEPTH VARIESSEE LANDSCAPEPLAN NOTESFILTER FABRICMIRAFI OR EQUAL12" SPIKEMULCH TO BE LEVEL WITH FINISHED GRADEPERENNIAL PLANTINGNOT TO SCALEL-2.13EQUAL SPACINGPERENNIALS (TYP.),PLANT IN STAGGEREDROWS UNLESSOTHERWISE SHOWN ONLANDSCAPE PLANMIN. 3"-4" DEPTHHARDWOOD MULCH OVERFILTER FABRIC, SEE NOTESFOR TYPE & COLOR.MIN. 12" PLANTING SOIL ASSPECIFIED, SEE NOTES.UNDISTURBED ANDUNCOMPACTEDSUBGRADEL-2.12SHRUB PLANTINGNOT TO SCALEPROVIDE MULCH, DO NOT BURY STEMS ORTRUNK. SEE NOTES FOR TYPE AND DEPTHREQUIRED.UNDISTURBED ANDUNCOMPACTED SUBGRADEPRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHESROOT BALL SHOULD SITDIRECTLY ON TOP OFUNDISTURBED SOIL.BACKFILL WITH TOPSOILFROM HOLE AND WATERTHOROUGHLY. PROVIDEPLANTING SOIL ASSPECIFIED IN NOTES.PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC,MIRAFI OR EQUALPLANT TOP OF ROOT BALL 1-2" ABOVESURROUNDING GRADE.PREPARE PLANTING AREA 3XTHE DIAMETER OF THEROOTBALLL-2.11TREE PLANTINGNOT TO SCALENOTES:1. TREE STAKING IS OPTIONAL.2. DO NOT PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS ANDBROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.3. FOR TREES IN CONTAINERS, REMOVE CONTAINER PRIOR TO PLANTING. FOR BARE ROOT TREES, PLACETREE IN MIDDLE OF PLANTING HOLE, SPREAD ROOTS OUT RADIALLY FROM THE TRUNK AROUND THEPREPARED HOLE.PREPARE PLANTING AREA 3X THEDIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL OR PERPLAN IF PLANTED IN A BIORETENTIONOR LARGER PLANTING AREAPLACE ROOTBALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOILEXPOSE TRUNK FLARE,DO NOT PILE MULCH AGAINST TREE TRUNKMULCH RING, DIAMETER PER PLAN ORLANDSCAPE NOTES. PLACE MULCH SO NOT INCONTACT WITH BASE OF TREE.COMPLETELY REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALLTWINE, ROPE AND BASKETS. DISPOSE INTOPROPER LOCATION.TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOTPRESSURE SO THAT THE ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.PLANTING SOIL, BACKFILL PLACED IN 6" LIFTSGUYING PLANSODUNDISTURBED SUBSOILROOTBALLPRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN BRANCHES16" POLY STRAP, 40 MIL. 1-1/2" WIDE1 FLAG PER WIRE3-GUY CABLES, DOUBLE STRAND, 14 GA. WIRESAT 120° SPACING, SEE GUYING PLAN18" MIN.MACHINE EDGE V-DITCH AROUNDALL TREES IN SODDED AREAS2"X2"X24" WOODEN STAKE AT AN ANGLELANDSCAPE NOTESSEEDING NOTESPage 254 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
COBALT TRUCK MOVEMENTS - IN
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 10-10-25 SK-1
FIRE TRUCK PROFILE:
ORIGINAL SIZE: 22"x34"
Page 255 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
COBALT TRUCK MOVEMENTS - OUT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 10-10-25 SK-2
FIRE TRUCK PROFILE:
ORIGINAL SIZE: 22"x34"
Page 256 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
C-3.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SET733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
R Dial 811 TRUCK MOVEMENT - INPage 257 of 262
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
C-3.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTER733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
R Dial 811 TRUCK MOVEMENT - OUTPage 258 of 262
ENTERPRISE DRSTORMWATER PONDPROPOSED BUILDING
623' x 280'
174,288 S.F.
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 1.5 1.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 1.8 2.5 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.8 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.1 2.7 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.1 1.8 2.9 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 2.4 2.9 2.3 2.8 3.6 3.8 3.5 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.7 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.8 3.7 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.8 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.8 3.4 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.8 2.3 2.8 3.5 3.8 3.5 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.4 3.8 3.7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.5 3.9 3.3 2.1 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 2.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.5 2.5 3.2 3.7 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.9 3.8 3.0 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.7 3.8 3.4 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.5 3.7 2.6 2.1 4.0 3.7 2.3 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.8 4.3 3.3 3.5 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 3.7 6.1 4.0 3.7 2.3 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 3.8 5.9 2.9 3.4 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.6 4.1 2.1 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 2.0 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.8 1.6 2.4 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.3 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.3 2.0 2.1 3.5 3.5 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.8 1.6 4.1 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.9 2.1 3.1 3.3 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.9 3.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 4.4 5.0 2.2 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.8 6.1 2.0 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 4.4 4.7 1.8 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.5 3.2 2.1 2.7 1.9 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.9 2.9 3.3 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.8 1.7 3.9 3.7 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.4 2.1 2.1 3.4 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.9 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.3 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 1.9 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.1 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 4.3 3.9 2.2 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.2 4.3 5.2 2.5 2.9 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.2 4.4 5.0 3.4 3.5 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 3.9 3.7 4.1 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.7 3.5 4.4 2.4 3.5 3.7 2.9 2.9 3.2 2.8 3.1 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.7 4.3 3.9 3.9 4.3 4.9 4.3 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.9 4.3 3.9 4.0 3.0 3.3 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.8 3.5 3.9 3.2 3.9 4.0 3.8 3.7 4.0 3.6 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 4.8 4.2 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.4 3.6 4.0 3.9 3.2 4.7 4.4 2.6 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.8 3.1 3.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.2 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.3 3.8 3.7 2.5 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.8 1.9 2.6 2.7 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.1 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.1 2.9 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.5 2.4 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.6 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.4 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.2 1.3 0.8 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.4 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 1.8 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.3 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BB
BBBB
AA2
AA2
AA2
AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4 AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4
AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4AA4
Luminaire Schedule
Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire
Lumens
Luminaire
Watts
Total
Watts
3 BB Single GARDCO OPF-S-A04-740-BLC ON
20FT SSS POLE 3FT BASE
0.900 10663 90.68 272.04
3 AA2 Single NV-W2-T2-64L-53-40K7 WALL
MOUNTED AT 24FT
0.900 11661 99 297
23 AA4 Single NV-W2-T4-64L-7-40K7 0.900 15301 136 3128
Calculation Summary
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
GROUND CALCS Illuminance Fc 0.35 6.1 0.0 N.A.N.A.
PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.01 0.2 0.0 N.A.N.A.
PARKING LOT Illuminance Fc 1.58 4.4 0.4 3.95 11.00
TRUCK LOT Illuminance Fc 1.67 5.3 0.0 N.A.N.A.
P-1.0COBALT BUSINESS CENTERPERMIT SETPHOTOMETRIC PLAN733 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Suite 700
GENERAL NOTES:
6130 Blue Circle Dr., Minnetonka, MN 55343
Ph 952-217-0400 - Fax 952-930-1632
www.pulseproducts.com
PHOTOMETRIC SCHEDULE:
Page 259 of 262
DN
DN
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
1. SHADING INDICATES AREA THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK.
2. OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS ARE TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION OF
EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH THE OWNER.
3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR & CABLE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY
DAMAGE CAUSED TO WALLS, FINISHES, CEILINGS ETC. IN THE COURSE OF THEIR
CONSTRUCTION. IF CONTRACTORS BEGIN WORK IN AN AREA WITH EXISTING DAMAGE THEY
ARE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
A300
1
A3002
A300
A300
3
4
MECH
WAREHOUSE
A303 1
A303
2
1
2
3
6
A B C D E F G H J K
4
L NM
5
SUB SLAB SANITARY.
OVERHEAD WATER.
5
3
7
OVERALL
GRIDS
FORMS
623'-0"
51'-6"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"51'-6"
623'-0"
51'-6"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"52'-0"51'-6"55'-0"55'-0"55'-0"55'-0"60'-0"280'-0"280'-0"55'-0"55'-0"55'-0"55'-0"60'-0"A302
1
A302
2
A301
1
A301
2
A3013
A302 3
A303
3
88'-0"14'-6" 48'-0"22'-6"48'-0" 14'-6"152'-0"14'-6" 48'-0"22'-6"48'-0" 14'-6"88'-0"
005 006 007 008 010 011 013 015 017 018 020 022 023 024 025 027 028 031 032 034 036 037 038
002001 046 045 044 043 0422'-0"5
40'-0" 7'-6"7'-6" 40'-0"88'-0"20'-0"64'-0"20'-0"88'-0"88'-0"20'-0"64'-0"20'-0"88'-0"9
004
003030
039
040
041
10
10
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391
T: 952-426-7400
F: 952-426-7440
MohagenHansen.com
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF
SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS,
INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED
DOCUMENTS.C:\Revit Projects\25106_MendotaHeightsSpecIndustrial_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtB.HUNKE/ S.OLIVER
J.JOHNSON
06/18/2025
24341
EndeavorDevelopment\MendotaHeights\25106_ShellAndCore
COBALT BUSINESS
CENTER
COBALT BC
1315 MENDOTA
HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN
55120
SHELL PLAN -
OVERALL
A200
47242
STEPHEN M. OLIVER, AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.- -07 18 2025
1" = 30'-0"A200
1 SHELL PLAN - OVERALL
FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES
TAG KEYNOTE
1 FLOOR DRAIN WITH SAND AND OIL INTERCEPTOR.
2 INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN LOCATION - COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION, COMBINATION, AND
SIZING WITH PLUMBING AND CIVIL - SEE ROOF PLAN FOR LOCATION OF ROOF DRAINS.
INTERIOR PIPING TO BE ROUTED AROUND WINDOWS; DO NOT GO IN FRONT OF A
WINDOW OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE.
3 LOCATION OF UNDERSLAB VAPOR BARRIER IN HATCHED AREA. GC AND CLIENT TO
COORDINATE FINAL LOCATIONS BEFORE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION.
4 BOLLARD, TYPICAL AT INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF OPENING.
5 UNIQUE PRECAST PANEL WIDTH.
6 CANOPY LINE ABOVE.
7 WASTE LINE AND EXTENTS OF OVERHEAD WATER. GC AND CLIENT TO COORDINATE W/
PLUMBING.
8 CANOPY DOWNSPOUT CONNECT TO STORM SEWER - SEE CIVIL.
9 STRUCTURAL BRACE FRAME BETWEEN COLUMNS - SEE STRUCT.
10 DASHED LINE SHOWS EXTENT OF REQUIRED BELOW GRADE FOUNDATION WALL
WATERPROOFING FROM T.O. FOOTING TO B.O. GRADE.
11 EXTERIOR STAIR AND RETAINING WALL - SEE CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL.
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 06/18/2025
Page 260 of 262
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 2
137' - 8"CLEAR HEIGHT
132' - 0"
LEVEL DOCK
96' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 4
139' - 8"
T.O. PANEL 3
138' - 8"
1 2 3 645
A301
3
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 2
137' - 8"
CLEAR HEIGHT
132' - 0"
LEVEL DOCK
96' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 1
136' - 8"
ABCDEFGHJKLNM
MATCH LINEA302
1
A302
2
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 2
137' - 8"
CLEAR HEIGHT
132' - 0"
LEVEL DOCK
96' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 4
139' - 8"
T.O. PANEL 3
138' - 8"
123645 A302
3
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 2
137' - 8"
CLEAR HEIGHT
132' - 0"
T.O. PANEL 4
139' - 8"
T.O. PANEL 3
138' - 8"
A B C D E F G H J K L NM
MATCH LINEA301
1
A301
2
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
PCP-1
INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL
COMPANY: FABCON.
FINISH: STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED.
COLOR: P-2.
P-1 PAINT
COMPANY: PPG
COLOR: PPG1011-1 PACIFIC PEARL.
PCP-2
PCP-3 INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL
COMPANY: FABCON.
FINISH: STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED.
COLOR: P-3.
NOTES:
1. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/ CLERESTORY FRAMES: SEE A002 GLAZING TYPES.
2.ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/ CLERESTORY FLASHING: MTL-1.
3.ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/ CLERESTORY SEALANT: TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR.
4.GLAZING: SEE A002 GLAZING TYPES.
5.PRECAST OPENING AT STOREFRONT: PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT PAINT.
6.PRECAST OPENING AT OVERHEAD DOORS: PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT PAINT.
7.PRECAST SEALANT: TYPICAL PAINTABLE SEALANT - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT PANEL.
8.OVERHEAD DOORS: PRE-FINISHED WHITE.
9.OVERHEAD DOOR FLASHING: MTL-1.
10. OVERHEAD DOOR BUMPERS: TYPICAL PRE-FINISHED BLACK.
11. HM DOORS: PAINTED P-2, U.N.O.
12. HM DOOR FLASHING: MTL-1.
13. CANOPY SOFFIT: SEE SOFFIT PLANS.
14. CANOPY FLASHING: MTL-2.
15. CANOPY RAIN LEADER: MTL-2.
16. BOLLARDS: PAINTED: "OSHA YELLOW".
17. SIDEWALK SEALANT: TO MATCH CONCRETE.
18. SIGNAGE: SIGNAGE BY TENANT PERMIT.
19. PRECAST PANEL TYPES AND HEIGHT: SEE A001 FOR PRECAST PANEL TYPES .
20. SAMPLES: PROVIDE SAMPLES FOR CLIENT AND ARCHITECT TO REVIEW BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION.
21. MOCK-UP: PROVIDE MOCK-UP OF EACH PAINT COLOR FOR CLIENT AND ARCHITECT TO
REVIEW ONSITE.
22. LIGHTING: SEE LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE LOCATIONS ON
ELEVATIONS TO BE CENTERED BETWEEN PRECAST OR ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS.
MTL-1 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM
COMPANY: FIRESTONE.
FINISH: UNICLAD.
COLOR: BONE WHITE.
P-2 PAINT
COMPANY: PPG.
COLOR: PPG1011-3 STARGAZER.
INSULATED PRE-CAST PANEL
COMPANY: FABCON.
FINISH: STEEL FORM FINISH PRECAST PANEL - PAINTED.
COLOR: P-1.
P-3 PAINT
COMPANY: PPG.
COLOR: PPG1011-5 IMPROBABLE.
ACM-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL
COMPANY: REYNOBOND.
FINISH: FLUSH.
COLOR: DEEP BLACK.
A0
MTL-2 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM
COMPANY: FIRESTONE.
FINISH: UNICLAD.
COLOR: MATTE BLACK.
ACM-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL
COMPANY: REYNOBOND.
FINISH: FLUSH.
COLOR: SAPPHIRE BLUE.DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391
T: 952-426-7400
F: 952-426-7440
MohagenHansen.com
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF
SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS,
INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED
DOCUMENTS.C:\Revit Projects\25106_MendotaHeightsSpecIndustrial_Master_jjohnson@mohagenhansen.com.rvtB.HUNKE/ S.OLIVER
J.JOHNSON
06/18/2025
24341
EndeavorDevelopment\MendotaHeights\25106_ShellAndCore
COBALT BUSINESS
CENTER
COBALT BC
1315 MENDOTA
HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN
55120
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS -
OVERALL
A300
47242
STEPHEN M. OLIVER, AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE LIC. NO.- -09 22 2025
1" = 30'-0"A300
2 ELEVATION - EAST - OVERALL
1" = 30'-0"A300
3 ELEVATION - NORTH - OVERALL
1" = 30'-0"A300
4 ELEVATION - WEST - OVERALL
1" = 30'-0"A300
1 ELEVATION - SOUTH - OVERALL
SOUTHEAST CORNER - FOR REFERENCE ONLY NORTHWEST CORNER - FOR REFERENCE ONLY
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 06/18/2025
1 CCD #1 07/18/2025
3 CCD #3 09/22/2025
1
1
3 3 3
3
3
Page 261 of 262
This page is intentionally left blank
9.d
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Friendly Hills Street Improvements Assessment Roll Reconsideration for
Parcels 27-27800-21-143 and 27-27800-21-071
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Provide direction to staff on reviewing the adopted assessment roll for the Friendly Hills Street
Improvement Project.
BACKGROUND:
City Council adopted resolution 2025-68 at its October 21, 2025, meeting. The adopted
assessment roll included an undeveloped parcel 27-27800-21-143. This parcel was part
separated from the adjacent 750 Mohican Lane property 27-27800-21-071 in 2009. The
separation was due to bank financing on the property with the underlying deed listing this as
one large parcel with two property identification numbers. An appeal to the assessment was
presented to the city clerk on October 21, 2025, objecting to the assessment on parcel 27-
27800-21-143.
If Council desires to reconsider the assessment on the property, they should direct staff to mail
a notice to the property owner. The assessment would then be discussed at the regularly
scheduled city council meeting on December 2, 2025. If the council chooses not to reconsider
this assessment, no action is required.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The assessment amount for each property in the Friendly Hills Street Improvement project is
$5,086.04. This action would shift the assessment amount from the Residential Assessment to
the to the Municipal Levy.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 262 of 262