Loading...
10 07 2025 City Council Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AMENDED CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA October 7, 2025 at 6:00 PM Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights 1.Call to Order 2.Roll Call 3.Pledge of Allegiance 4.Approval of the Agenda The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline. 5.Public Comments - for items not on the agenda Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up. 6.Consent Agenda Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item, the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business. a.Approve Minutes from the September 16, 2025, City Council Meeting b.Approve Minutes from the September 16, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting c.Acknowledge Minutes from the August 26, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting d.Acknowledge Minutes from the July 16, 2025, Airport Relations Commission Meeting e.Approve a Massage Therapist License f.Accept the Retirement of Frank Hazzard from the Mendota Heights Fire Department. g.Approve the Appointment of Mendota Heights Fire Department Training Lieutenants h.Designate Roy Kingsley as Authority Having Jurisdiction for Fire Code Services and Page 1 of 194 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC i.Acknowledge the July Par 3 Financial Report j.Approve Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to Provide Recycling Services k.Approve Request for Proposals for a Geothermal Assessment of the city's Public Works Facility l.Acknowledge Quarterly Budget and Building Activity Reports m.Approve Claims List 7.Presentations a. Badge Pinning of Mendota Heights Fire Department Training Lieutenants 8.Public Hearings 9.New and Unfinished Business a.Resolution 2025-63 Authorizing the Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A, Pledging for the Security Thereof Special Assessments and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof b.Resolution 2025-64 Approving the Adoption of the City of Mendota Heights Amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Planning Case 2025-02) c.Resolution 2025-65 Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 1867 Hunter Lane (Planning Case 2025-17) 10.Community / City Administrator Announcements 11.City Council Comments 12.Adjourn Next Meeting October 21, 2025 at 6:00PM Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals with disabilities upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on NDC4/Town Square Television Cable Channel 18/HD798 and online at townsquare.tv/Mendota-Heights-Streaming Page 2 of 194 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Paper, Mazzitello, and Maczko were also present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS No one from the public wished to be heard. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilor Lorberbaum moved approval of the consent agenda as presented, pulling items B, C, F, and H. a.Approval of September 2, 2025, City Council Minutes b.Approve Minutes from the August 19, 2025, City Council Meeting c.Approve Minutes from the August 19, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting d.Approve Minutes from the September 3, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting e.Approve a Massage Therapist License f.Approve Purchase of Twelve Radar Feedback Speed Limit Signs 6.a Page 3 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 5 g.Adopt Resolution 2025-61 Calling for an Assessment Hearing on the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements h.Approve an Interim Management Agreement for the Courtyard by Marriott to Allow the Sale of Intoxicating Liquor i.Approval of Claims List Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS B) APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 19, 2025, CITY COUNCIL MEETING C) APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 19, 2025, CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING Councilor Maczko noted that he pulled Items B and C as he was not present and needed to abstain. Councilor Mazzitello commented that he was also absent from those meetings. Councilor Paper moved to approve MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 19, 2025, CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND AUGUST 19, 2025, CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AS PRESENTED. Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstentions: 2 (Maczko and Mazzitello) F) APPROVE PURCHASE OF TWELVE RADAR FEEDBACK SPEED LIMIT SIGNS Councilor Maczko stated that he would like to table this item in order to obtain more information on the desired outcome and purpose. Councilor Maczko moved to table PURCHASE OF TWELVE RADAR FEEDBACK SPEED LIMIT SIGNS. Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 H) APPROVE AN INTERIM MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR Councilor Paper stated that he is cautious because of the last hotel that was approved and changed hands in ownership. He noted that this is a transition from a national chain to a small, new operator. He asked what is done to properly vet this new operator that is not local. Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson stated that this would be a temporary license that would allow the new owner to establish their business, at which point a regular liquor license would be reviewed Page 4 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 5 and described that process. She noted that if there are additional concerns, she would invite those during that process. Councilor Paper asked who would have the background checked, as this is an entity and not a person. City Clerk Nancy Bauer stated that the manager of the hotel would have a background check completed when the liquor license application is reviewed. Councilor Paper asked what would happen if the manager were to leave. City Clerk Nancy Bauer replied that the hotel is supposed to notify the City, and a new background check would be run on the appropriate party. Councilor Lorberbaum asked if compliance checks are completed. Police Chief Kelly McCarthy replied that anyone selling liquor receives compliance checks. Councilor Paper moved to approve AN INTERIM MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT TO ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PRESENTATIONS No items scheduled. PUBLIC HEARING No items scheduled. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A) FISCAL YEAR 2026 PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND LEVY Finance Director Kristen Schabacker presented the proposed 2026 preliminary budget and levy, which the Council is asked to consider for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello acknowledged the great work of Finance Director Kristen Schabacker. Mayor Levine echoed those thoughts of appreciation towards Finance Director Kristen Schabacker as well as all the department heads, noting the great work everyone did to hold the budget. Councilor Mazzitello moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-58 APPROVING PROPOSED 2025 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 2026. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Page 5 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 5 Nays: 0 Councilor Mazzitello moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-59 ADOPTING 2026 PRELIMINARY BUDGET. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilor Mazzitello moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2025-60 APPROVING FINAL 2025 TAX LEVY FOR SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT NO. 1 COLLECTIBLE IN 2026. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 B) ORDINANCE NO. 602 – SHORT TERM HOME RENTAL ORDINANCE UPDATES Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a brief background on this item. The Council was being asked to consider Ordinance No. 602 – Short Term Home Rental Ordinance. Mayor Levine thanked Community Development Manager Sarah Madden for the updates. Councilor Lorberbaum moved to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 602 AMENDING TITLE 3: BUSINESS AND LICENSE REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 5: RENTAL HOUSING, ARTICLE A: SHORT TERM RENTALS. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilor Lorberbaum moved to authorize PUBLICATION OF SUMMARY ORDINANCE OF ORDINANCE NO. 602. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson announced upcoming community events and activities. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilor Paper noted upcoming events for the West Saint Paul Police K9 Foundation. Councilor Mazzitello stated that his heart has been heavy for the last several months, and longer than that, noting the recent anniversary of the September 11th attacks and the recent disturbing turn of events. He stated that 33 years ago, he swore an Oath to protect the Constitution, which guarantees that the government will not take away certain rights. He stated that the Constitution does not address when people Page 6 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 5 take those rights away from others, providing examples of recent events. He commented that hate has always existed in the world, and instead of embracing darkness, they need to be the light. He stated that he is also guilty of this and needs to do better, just as everyone does. He recognized that one City Council is not going to change the world, but that change needs to start at home. Councilor Maczko agreed that people need to truly listen to each other and seek to understand rather than hate. He stated that they cannot continue like this as a nation, and people need to be role models at home. He stated that humans were given the power to reason and make choices and decisions, and they should realize that everything they do is a choice rather than blaming others. Councilor Lorberbaum recognized that September is Hispanic and Latin American Heritage Month and recognized the contributions made by those communities. She stated that she heard from the new Metropolitan Council Representative related to Metro Transit. She stated that the plan is to start a new route 354 in December and provided information on the route and related stops. Mayor Levine echoed the comments of the other members of the Council tonight. She also challenged the public to attend the City Council meetings or work sessions in person. She stated that while they have wildly different opinions on the Council and may disagree, they always treat each other with respect. She challenged the community to always do better and be part of the wave to start the change that is needed. Councilor Paper wished everyone who celebrates a happy New Year. ADJOURN Councilor Mazzitello moved to adjourn. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. ____________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Nancy Bauer City Clerk Page 7 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Maczko (arrived at 4:40 pm), Mazzitello (arrived at 4:34 pm), and Paper were in attendance. Others present included: Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Community Development Manager Sarah Madden, Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie, Police Chief Kelly McCarthy, City Attorney Amy Schmidt, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer. Mayor Levine asked that the agenda be revised to add item 2c - Discussion of Radar Feedback Speed Limit Signs. Motion made by Councilor Lorberbaum, seconded by Councilor Paper and carried. ZONING CODES ON RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT Community Development Manager Madden provided an overview of recent discussions between staff and builders regarding updates to residential roof pitch and building height standards in the updated Zoning Code. She explained that there have been questions about how these standards are interpreted and why they were implemented. Her presentation included a summary of the updated standards and the background behind their development. She noted that the previous code included a minimum roof pitch of 3:12, which remains unchanged, but the updated code now includes a maximum pitch of 9:12. The second standard of the new code maintains the overall maximum height limit. However, for infill development in the R-1 Zoning District, the maximum height is based on the average height of the two adjacent residential structures. This calculated average could be less than 25 feet. To build higher than this average, an applicant must apply for a conditional use permit. If the proposed height exceeds 25 feet, a variance application is also required. Mayor Levine asked if a triangulation calculation could be done from the street to get the roof height of adjacent properties. Community Development Manager Madden stated that it could be done that way, but trees or a long driveway may interfere with getting accurate measurements. Mayor Levine stated that the standards may need to be refined for larger lots. These new standards in code were discussed for the infill lots. Page 8 of 194 6.b September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2 Councilor Lorberbaum asked for clarification of a roof pitch. Community Development Manager Madden described how the roof pitch was determined and handed out a sheet that diagrammed roof pitch. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that Council had discussed “character of the neighborhood” standards when discussing roofing standards for the new zoning code amendments. Mayor Levine asked if larger lots could have setbacks for the roof requirements. Community Development Manager Madden stated that in the old code there were increased setbacks from the side property line corresponding with the height and in the new code that language was replaced. Councilor Maczko stated that there were past discussions regarding these issues because of the older homes in the far north end of the city that have smaller lots. Councilor Mazzitello stated that under the updated code, a conditional use permit is required for buildings exceeding the new maximum height, which is capped at 25 feet unless a variance is obtained. He asked whether the 25-foot height is still measured from the midpoint of the tallest gable. Community Development Manager Madden confirmed that this measurement standard remains unchanged. Councilor Mazzitello asked if the previous code had a roof pitch requirement. Community Development Manager Madden stated that it did not have a maximum roof pitch, but it did have a minimum of 3:12 pitch. Sean Doyle, from the audience, commented on the need for clarification of roof pitch standards and expressed concern that the 25-foot height limit may be too restrictive, potentially requiring conditional use permits and causing delays. Mike Fritz, M & M Homes, from the audience, stated he would be happy with a 12:12 pitch for the main body. Councilor Mazzitello asked if the tallest gable, where the highest point of the main structure is measured, has a 12:12 pitch and no ridge exceeds that height, would builders be satisfied. Mike Fritz answered that it would be satisfactory. Mayor Levine summarized the conversation, stating that the questions raised were about the challenges of measuring adjacent properties, if permission is not granted from the other property owner, roof heights and pitch concerns, and the definition of “main body”. Council directed staff to look at a 12:12 pitch maximum for a roof as opposed to a 9:12 pitch. She noted that for the height issue, a conditional use permit is needed for more than 25 feet in height. Community Development Manager Madden clarified from what she heard in the discussion that the pitch should be changed to 12:12 and to clarify the language of main body of the roof versus ornamental or accessory roofs. She noted that the averaging of height and the conditional use permit to exceed the height could be reevaluated in the future. Page 9 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3 Councilor Mazzitello added that the main body ridge cannot be exceeded. Community Development Manager Madden stated she will add that language. REGIONAL COUNCIL OF MAYORS REQUEST FOR SUPPORT Mayor Levine stated that at the Regional Council of Mayors meeting it was discussed for local Mayors to sign a letter supporting the call to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The mayor of Minnetonka, Brad Wiersum, wrote a letter on this issue that was included in the packet. With the Council’s' permission she would like to sign a letter banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Councilor Mazzitello thanked Mayor Levine for bringing the idea forward. Councilor Maczko stated he agreed with the sentiment of the letter. He stated he believes that more needs to be done to solve the problem than just banning assault weapons and that mental health issues need to be addressed. Councilor Mazzitello stated that he was not in agreement with the Mayor signing the letter. The problems being faced are not addressed in the letter. He clarified his position, saying that the problem is hate and that banning something doesn’t help. Mayor Levine stated that the attached letter is not what she would sign. Councilor Lorberbaum stated that she is not comfortable approving the Mayor signing a letter without seeing the letter first. She added that she would like to do something, but does not know what she can do to show her support. Councilor Paper stated that he did not think that gun control was a city issue for the City Council to direct. The Mayor requested Chief McCarthy to comment. Chief McCarthy commented that regulating high-capacity magazines and assault rifles to reduce gun violence would be consistent with other regulatory efforts to reduce crime. She stated that this is a leadership question for the Council. Councilor Maczko stated that the Mayor could sign a letter asking the legislature to ban assault rifles and high-capacity magazines, but that his preference would be that she would sign as herself and not as a representative of the entire Mendota Heights City Council. Mayor Levine stated that it is her prerogative to sign a letter, and while she would like the support of the Council, she does not need it to sign the letter herself. She said that she has heard the feedback and comments from the Council. She stated that she thinks it is important to sign the letter but felt that the topic needs further consideration. Page 10 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 4 RADAR FEEDBACK SPEED LIMIT SIGNS Public Works Director Ruzek stated staff will be asking for Council approval to purchase 12 radar feedback speed limit signs. The total cost is approximately $32,000 and is eligible for 100% funding through Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. In staff’s opinion, these signs are effective in slowing down traffic. He stated that Councilor Maczko has asked for additional information, additional speed studies, and questioned whether the signs are going to be effective. Councilor Maczko stated that his background is in traffic safety and engineering. He was unclear of the problem we are trying to solve with these signs. He said that these signs are not effective if permanently installed. He thought that MSA funds would be better used elsewhere. He asked that this item be pulled from the meeting agenda tonight to allow for further discussion. Mayor Levine asked if this is for a study, what would be the goals and outcomes. Public Works Director Ruzek reiterated that staff believe these signs are effective in slowing vehicles, and they would be installed on some of our State Aid routes. Mayor Levine asked if they would be placed in transitional areas. Public Works Director Ruzek stated some would be. He added that they are data collection devices, and staff would receive real-time data. Councilor Lorberbaum stated that staff believe they are effective and that she also respects the experience of Councilor Maczko. She suggested that it is not worth rushing and a discussion can be held later. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that the item can be discussed at a future work session, but the price to purchase the signs will more than likely increase. Councilor Mazzitello stated that he supports the proposal as is but that he would not object if the Council were to table this item. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that there were other ways to collect pre-data and a consultant would need to be hired, which would add to the cost of collecting and analyzing the data. Councilor Paper stated he liked that data is being collected from the signs and understood that a consultant may need to be hired to analyze the data that is captured. Mayor Levine stated if she heard correctly, they would be used in transition zones. Public Works Director Ruzek stated not right at the transition point, but in the transition zone. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Mazzitello made a motion to adjourn the work session, seconded by Councilor Lorberbaum. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 5:53 p.m. Page 11 of 194 September 16, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 5 _________________________ ATTEST: Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor _____________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 12 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 8 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 26, 2025 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Acting Chair Jason Stone, Commissioners Patrick Corbett, Cindy Johnson, Brian Udell, Jeff Nath, and Steve Goldade. Those absent: Chair Litton Field. Approval of Agenda Acting Chair Stone stated that a revised agenda has been circulated and noted that Item 4B will not be discussed tonight as the applicant has withdrawn Planning Case No. 2025-15. The revised agenda was approved as submitted. Approval of July 22, 2025, Minutes COMMISSIONER NATH MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 22, 2025. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Hearings A)TABLED PLANNING CASE 2025-12 M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1867 HUNTER LANE – MRCCA PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the applicant and owner’s representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single- family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. A duly noticed public hearing was opened at the July 22nd Planning Commission meeting. Two residents representing one household spoke in favor of the proposal, and one resident spoke inquiring about tree removal and any plans for additional utility work for the construction of the home. City staff have received one written comment related to this item, which was included in the staff report. During discussion of the application, the Commission expressed concerns with the available details on the proposed landscaping for the new home site and requested additional information from the applicant. The applicant was unable to attend the July 22nd meeting, but has provided updated landscaping plans and details, which were included in the packet. An updated survey was also provided, illustrating the location of existing trees on the property. Page 13 of 194 6.c August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 8 Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; one written comment was received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson referenced a comment made at the last meeting related to a potential intermittent stream and asked if there was any information on that. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that there is no confirmation of the existence of the intermittent stream. She noted that this is one parcel of three owned by the same property owner, so the stream could be located on an adjacent property if it does exist. Commissioner Johnson asked if the rate of stormwater flow had been reviewed. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that the rates are not factored in for the single- family home construction, and a measure of abstraction is required, and noted that this request meets that requirement. Commissioner Johnson referenced the primary conservation area on the western edge of the property and asked staff to identify that area. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided additional details on the forested area of the bluff that is considered to be the existing vegetative stand on the edge of the property. She highlighted the bluff impact zone (BIZ) and confirmed that the vegetative stand is within the BIZ. Acting Chair Stone commented that the public hearing from the last meeting was tabled and, therefore, is still open and invited comments from the public. The applicant confirmed that he is available to answer any questions. Commissioner Johnson thanked the applicant for updating and providing more detailed information, noting that because this is an MRCCA permit, there are more requirements. Theresa Cosgriff, 1875 Hunter Lane, noted that she and her husband submitted a written comment to the Mayor on this topic. She noted that this lot has sat vacant for many years in rough condition. She stated that the neighborhood has been updating, and people have been reinvesting in their properties, and she believed that the new home would assist in that vision for the neighborhood. She stated that she and her husband built their home five years ago and enjoyed the flexibility of working with the Planning Commission and City Council, and asked that this applicant be provided with the same flexibility. Page 14 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 8 Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Stone asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Johnson commented that it seems the existing bituminous drive is going to be kept and expanded. She asked for more information on the material that would be used for the expanded portion of the driveway. Mike Fritz, applicant, commented that the decision on that material has not yet been made. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MRCCA-CRITICAL AREA PERMIT REQUEST FOR 1867 HUNTER LANE, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.A BUILDING PERMIT, INCLUDING A GRADING PLAN, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK. 2.THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. ALL PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. 3.ALL EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY GRADING AND SITE WORK ACTIVITIES. SUCH MEASURES MUST REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL PROPER SITE RESTORATION PLANS ARE COMPLETED. 4.ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. 5.ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. WEEKENDS. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Acting Chair Stone advised the City Council would consider this application at its September 2, 2025, meeting. B)PLANNING CASE 2025-15 BC MIDDLETON LLC, WENTWORTH HILLS – PRELIMINARY PLAT This application was withdrawn. New and Unfinished Business Page 15 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 8 A)DORSET ROAD – STREET IMPROVEMENTS Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that Dakota County, in partnership with the cities of Mendota Heights and West St. Paul, is planning to reconstruct Delaware Avenue in 2027 between Marie Avenue and Dodd Road. As part of this project, the project team has evaluated the Delaware Avenue and Dorset Road intersection. Currently, the Dorset Road approach to Delaware Avenue has a slope that exceeds the City’s maximum allowable roadway grade of six percent. This condition presents long-term safety and maintenance concerns, and the County project provides a feasible opportunity to address this issue. Commissioner Johnson asked if the proposed length of the cul-de-sac would meet the City's requirements. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that the current length would be 640 feet and anticipated that the new Code would allow a length of more than 500 feet. He stated that the current language in the Code related to 500 feet is not enforceable. He explained that when the new language is adopted, most existing cul-de-sacs would come into conformance with the Code if less than 750 feet. Commissioner Johnson referenced the northwest property that would be proposed to be purchased by Dakota County and asked for more information. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie identified the property, 1211 Delaware, and noted that the property has already been acquired by Dakota County. Commissioner Johnson asked if staff had considered making Dorset Road go through that property. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that it is not something the consultant or County has looked at, noting that he is unsure there would be sufficient space for turning movements. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that it is still anticipated to have a single-family home on that property in the future, as the County only needs about two feet on the eastern border, along with the easement. Commissioner Corbett asked for more information on the location of the right-of-way. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that the right-of-way shown on the map is incorrect and identified the location of the existing right-of-way as well as previously vacated right-of-way. Commissioner Corbett asked if there has been consideration of residents’ land that would be used in terms of funding. Page 16 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 8 Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that without going through the formal negotiations, they have not decided one way or the other. He stated that they are asking for a recommendation from the Commission to forward to the City Council, noting that staff does not favor one option over the other. He also asked the Commission to hear the input from the residents in attendance. Commissioner Goldade asked about the differences between the two concepts other than the cul- de-sac length. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie replied that the true differences are the lots that would be impacted. He stated that each concept would impact a total of three properties, although not the same properties. Acting Chair Stone asked if staff had a preference on the concepts from an engineering standpoint. Assistant Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that, objectively, a cul-de-sac does reduce the issue of conflict and is something that has been identified as a safety concern related to the slope of the road. He stated that he does not have a preference between the two cul-de-sac concepts. Acting Chair Stone asked if staff are aware of any accidents on this road. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that there is no crash data recorded in this area. Acting Chair Stone asked for the recommendation of the Public Works Director. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that he aligns with the comments made by the Assistant Engineer. He noted that the neighbors in this area may have more input on a desired concept. Commissioner Goldade asked and received confirmation that the referenced improved safety would be related to vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that there would also be a benefit for the Public Works staff when plowing. Commissioner Johnson inquired about the construction schedule for the trail along Delaware. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that the trail along Delaware would be part of this project, from Marie to Dodd Road. Acting Chair Stone invited the public to provide input. Scott Swank, ½ Dorset Road, identified mature trees that they would be losing as part of the Delaware project. He noted that option one would remove additional trees from their property, and therefore, he would oppose that and prefer option two, which more evenly takes from all properties. He noted that option one takes 75 to 80 percent of the property from his backyard. He confirmed that he supports concept two. Page 17 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 8 Commissioner Johnson noted that concept two would still seem to impact their trees. Heidi Swank, ½ Dorset Road, commented that concept two would impact one of the two trees. She stated that they will lose all their front yard trees either way, but they see the value in the project and can replant trees. She agreed that the Dorset Road hill is problematic, and they have experienced a driver sliding down the hill into their yard. She noted that they have also watched snowplows have trouble with the hill in the winter. Arthur Miller, 1 Dorset Road, stated that he purchased his lot in 1964 and has seen injuries on the road from children skateboarding and vehicles that cannot make it up the hill in the winter. He agreed that the cul-de-sac would be the better option for safety. Mary and Tim Kirby, 3 Dorset Road, stated that they support this plan, and she prefers concept two. She acknowledged that they would lose some trees, but noted that the trees they would lose are not as valuable as the trees in the Swanks’ yard. She stated that people have run into the tree in their yard coming down the hill, as it is a dangerous slope. Mr. Kirby also commented on the dangerous road conditions in the winter because of the slope. Mrs. Kirby stated that she does have questions about drainage and would like to see a vegetative garden to absorb some of the drainage. Mr. Kirby commented that this change would move some of the cut-through traffic to cut through Mears and, therefore, would encourage some type of traffic calming on Mears as well. Mike Kuenster, 9 Mears Avenue, stated that regardless of whether concept one or two is chosen, he would like to comment on his experience living on the corner of Mears and Dodd. He commented that this is the third time he has been at City Hall to speak on this. He asked if electronic stop signs are used in the city. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that the City currently does not have enhanced stop signs. He stated that there are some speed radar feedback signs, which are limited to collector streets and striped roadways. He commented that the signage was recently replaced at that intersection. He commented that his neighbors have young children, and he has safety concerns. He stated that traffic that would have normally turned onto Dorset to go to Mears would naturally have slowed speeds during that turning movement, but now will turn directly onto Mears. Acting Chair Stone asked if there were thoughts to install speed bumps on Mears. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that staff would never recommend speed bumps, noting that he is not aware of any communities in Dakota County that use speed bumps. He commented on the conflicts that would be created for snowplowing. He stated that other improvements could be considered for traffic calming. He acknowledged that there is cut-through traffic, and the stop signs in that area have been installed as a method to slow traffic. Mr. Kuenster noted that Lilydale senior community has speed bumps, and it was confirmed that it is a private roadway that is privately maintained. He asked his neighborhood to be the test for electronic stop signs. Page 18 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 8 Commissioner Goldade commented that the issue of traffic control seems to be outside the purview of the Commission. Commissioner Nath noted that other traffic calming measures could be considered, other than a speed bump. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the first step would be to collect data, acknowledging that for someone standing in their yard, it would seem fast for a vehicle to pass by at the speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Commissioner Goldade stated that in the staff presentation, it was mentioned that two people opposed the project, but they did not speak tonight. He asked if proper notice was provided. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that the notice area for this project was actually expanded, and every resident who provided feedback was also sent notification of the meeting. Commissioner Johnson recognized that the Swanks prefer concept two, which shows an extension of their driveway that could impact their trees. She stated that from her perspective, in either concept, they would lose their trees. She asked if the Swanks would still prefer concept two. Mrs. Swank commented that they may still lose the trees. She acknowledged that their lot is not very private, but concept one would take more of their land, and therefore, they would still prefer concept two. She stated that they could perhaps rethink the driveway to save the tree. Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that the concepts are conceptual, and it is possible that the driveway width and trail alignment could be tweaked to save trees. He noted that it is also possible that additional trees could be added within the right-of-way. Acting Chair Stone commented that there is a steep hill and all the residents on that street who spoke prefer concept two, and therefore, he will also support that concept. He suggested that the City also complete a study related to the traffic that will be pushed over to Mears and the traffic calming that could be added. Commissioner Johnson agreed that concept two would seem to have the least impact, as it spreads the impact among the neighbors. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, TO RECOMMEND THAT STAFF PROCEED WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE DORSET ROAD CONNECTION TO DELAWARE AVENUE AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CUL-DE-SAC AS SHOWN IN CONCEPT TWO. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Staff Announcements / Updates Page 19 of 194 August 26, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 8 Community Development Manager Sarah Madden noted the next scheduled meeting date of September 25th. She provided an update on recent actions of the City Council related to cases recommended by the Planning Commission. Adjournment COMMISSIONER NATH MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:19 P.M. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Page 20 of 194 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES July 16, 2025 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, July 16, 2025 at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve. 1.CALL TO ORDER Chair Norling called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Commissioners present: Norling, Sharma, Bobbitt, Sloan, Dunn, Neuharth, Hamiel Staff present: City Administrator Jacobson and Administrative Coordinator Desmond Public present: Rose Agnew 2.CONSENT AGENDA a.Approve Minutes from the May 21, 2025 Meeting b.Acknowledge Airport Operational Statistics Reports 1.Complaint Information 2.Runway Use Information Chair Norling approved the consent agenda. 3.PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments 4.BUSINESS a.ARC Update to the City Council Chair Norling initiated a discussion on preparing an update to the City Council and shared a draft presentation, noting that the last update was given in 2015. Commissioner Dunn reported that he had spoken with Liz Petschel regarding the history of the ARC. He noted that she is willing to assist with documenting this history. Chair Norling asked Commissioner Dunn to request her help in drafting a brief written chronicle of the commission’s origins. Commissioners Sloan and Dunn recalled that the commission began when new runways were added. City Administrator Jacobson invited Commissioner Hamiel to provide background on MASAC and its historical role in addressing airport noise. Commissioner Hamiel explained that MASAC was before the NOC and functioned similarly to the current NOC, measuring noise levels and helping, at that time, determine whether the airport would remain in its current location. Page 21 of 194 6.d Chair Norling reviewed the commission’s purpose as defined in the city code and asked for feedback. Commissioner Bobbitt commented that in the bullet point “Actively involved in addressing airport noise issues” the words “involved” and “addressing” may be changed to something more specific and stronger. He also suggested moving the bullet points around and adding one about communication to the City Council. Commissioner Neuharth proposed including examples of monthly monitoring charts and comparisons of past and current noise contour maps in the presentation. Commissioner Sloan suggested highlighting the noise monitors that are in Mendota Heights. Chair Norling acknowledged these suggestions and asked City Administrator Jacobson to circulate the draft presentation to commissioners for review and comment. Commissioner Sloan further asked whether RNAV should be addressed in the slides. Commissioner Neuharth recommended adding future educational opportunities for commissioners and council members, such as tower and airport visits. Vice Chair Sharma inquired about the timeline for the presentation. Chair Norling responded that the goal is to present to the City Council in October. 5.INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE a.FAA Staffing Articles 6.ANNOUNCEMENTS AND COMMISSIONER COMMENTS City Administrator Jacobson announced that phase II of runway construction will run from August 18 to September 26. Commissioner Dunn commented that the first phase of construction didn’t have much of an impact in the spring. Chair Norling said that the decibels were up a lot in the spring during the construction. Commissioner Neuharth asked if there would be something going out to the residents about the construction and runway shutdown. City Administrator Jacobson said that the city will provide information in city communications, including social media and Friday News. She added that the communications and notifications would primarily come from the MAC. City Administrator Jacobson announced that the FAA’s RNAV implementation was delayed until March of 2026. 7.ADJOURN Motion by Neuharth and second by Sloan to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Chair Norling adjourned the meeting at 7:01pm. Page 22 of 194 6.e REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve a Massage Therapist License ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk ACTION REQUEST: Approve a massage therapist license. BACKGROUND: Kim Sa Ramirez has submitted a massage therapist license to work at Hush Therapeutic Massage in Mendota Heights. She has completed the application requirements, including a successful background investigation, and the fees have been paid. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 23 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.f REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Accept the Retirement of Frank Hazzard from the Mendota Heights Fire Department. ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief ACTION REQUEST: Accept the retirement of Frank Hazzard from the Mendota Heights Fire Department, effective September 30, 2025. BACKGROUND: Frank Hazzard was recruited to the Mendota Heights Fire Department in December 2014. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Frank's firefighter position in the fire department was a budgeted position. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 24 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.g REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Appointment of Mendota Heights Fire Department Training Lieutenants ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City Administrator Dan Johnson, Fire Chief ACTION REQUEST: Approve the appointment of Cory Lane and Dustin Truesdell as Training Lieutenants for the Mendota Heights Fire Department, effective September 16, 2025. BACKGROUND: The City Council recently authorized the Fire Department to hire two Training Lieutenants to assist the training captain with training of existing and new firefighters in the fire department. These roles will support the Fire Academy, which trains new recruits, as well as support ongoing departmental training for existing firefighters to ensure that firefighters continue to be trained and certified to provide emergency services. The Fire Department conducted a competitive internal process for these positions and is recommending the appointment of Cory Lane and Dustin Truesdell as the Fire Department Training Lieutenants, effective September 16, 2025. These positions will serve four-year terms that will alternate appointments every two years. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: When the City Council authorized this posting on August 6, 2025 it was noted that the first of the two positions was budgeted but that the second position was unbudgeted for 2025. The second position has been added to the preliminary budget for 2026. The second Training Lieutenant position would result in approximately $950 in incremental pay in 2025 due to the stipend and hourly pay differential included with the position that will be covered by the Fire Department budget. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 25 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.h REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Designate Roy Kingsley as Authority Having Jurisdiction for Fire Code Services and Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Dan Johnson, Fire Chief ACTION REQUEST: Approve the designation of Roy Kingsley, Owner of Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC, as the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) for performing sprinkler plan reviews and other fire code inquiries on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights, and approve a professional services agreement between the City and Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC. BACKGROUND: The City of Mendota Heights requires expert review and inspection of fire protection systems and compliance with fire codes within its jurisdiction. To ensure timely and professional service, the City seeks to designate Roy Kingsley, owner of Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC, as the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) for all fire code matters, including sprinkler plan reviews and field inspections. Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC will provide plan review and field inspection for all types of fire protection systems within the Mendota Heights Fire Department's area of protection. Plans will be reviewed, corrections noted as needed, and forwarded to the City Fire Marshal. A professional services agreement has been negotiated with Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC, outlining the scope of services, fee schedule, insurance requirements, and other standard contract provisions. The agreement establishes an initial term through December 31, 2026, with options for renewal, and sets the labor rate at $60.00 per hour, with travel reimbursed at the IRS rate of $0.70 per mile. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Services provided by Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC will be billed at a rate of $60.00 per hour, plus mileage reimbursement at $0.70 per mile, as needed. The cost for these services will be fully covered by permit fees collected from property owners and contractors who require fire protection system reviews and inspections. Page 26 of 194 ATTACHMENTS: 1.Professional Services Agreement – Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 27 of 194 1 235985v2 SERVICES AGREEMENT This SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into on this day of , 2025 (the “Effective Date”), and is by and between KINGSLEY FIRE CONSULTING LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, 1971 South Lane, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 (“Contractor”), and the CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, a Minnesota municipal corporation, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 (“City”) (each one, a “Party” or collectively, the “Parties”). The Parties, intending to be legally bound, for good and valuable consideration, hereby agree to the following: 1.Services. The Contractor will provide the Services outlined in Exhibit A. 2.Fees. The City will pay the Contractor for services according to the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B. 3.Term & Termination. (a)Initial Term. The initial term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall end on December 31, 2026 (the “Initial Term”). Unless otherwise terminated early as provided in this Agreement, this Agreement will automatically renew for two consecutive two - year terms (each one, a “Renewal Term”). Each Renewal Term shall be according to the same terms and conditions as the Initial Term, including the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B. Any increase in any fees outlined in the fee schedule shall require a written amendment to this Agreement to be made and executed by the Parties. (b)Early Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement early for good cause shown. A good cause is the other party’s material breach of this Agreement. The City’s failure to pay any fees due and owing pursuant to Exhibit B within 35 days of receipt of an invoice by the City shall constitute good cause for the Contractor to terminate this Agreement. Before either Party may terminate this Agreement early for good cause, that Party must provide the other party written notice of the material breach and an opportunity to cure within 30 days. If the material breach is not cured within said period, the Party may notify the other party that this Agreement is terminated immediately. 4.Independent Contractor. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. The Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. The Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for the Contractor’s performance under this Agreement. The City and the Contractor agree that the Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that the Contractor or any of the Contractor’s agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. The Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for the Contractor’s own FICA payments, worker’s compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment Page 28 of 194 2 235985v2 taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any benefits from the City, including, without limitation, insurance benefits, sick and vacation leave, Earned Sick and Safe Time, workers’ compensation benefits, unemployment compensation, disability, severance pay, or retirement benefits. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership, joint venture or agency relationship between the parties. 5.Subcontractors. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. The Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. The Contractor must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from City. The Contractor must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 6.Insurance. (a)The Contractor shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect the Contractor from claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act, as applicable, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from t he performance of the services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Workers’ Compensation/Employers’ Liability As required by Minnesota Statutes Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence $1,000,000 general aggregate Automobile (owned, hired, and non-owned) $1,000,000 combined single limit The City shall be names as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non-contributory basis. (b)The Contractor shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy to insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out the performance of professional services for the City, in the insured’s capacity as the Contractor, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error, or omission of the insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. The policy shall provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $3,000,000 aggregate, with a deductible maximum of $125,000. (c)Before commencing work, the Contractor shall provide to the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverages in a form acceptable to the City. The certificate shall provide that such insurance cannot be cancelled until 30 days after the City has received written notice of the insurer’s intention to cancel the insurance. 7.Indemnification. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its Page 29 of 194 3 235985v2 officials, employees, agents, and contractors, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of or by a reason of the execution or performance of the services provided under this Agreement, and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim whatsoever character arising under this Agreement. 8. Standard of Care. The Contractor shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, express or implied, is included in this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of the Contractor’s services. 9. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In providing the services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the services to be provided. 10. Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. The Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (“MGDPA”), as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the MGDPA, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the Contractor receives a request to release data, the Contractor must immediately notify the City. The City will give the Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. In addition to the indemnification provisions set forth in Section 7 of this Agreement, the Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, employees, agents, and contractors harmless from any claims resulting from the unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data by the Contractor, its officers, agents, partners, employees, volunteers, assignees or subcontractors. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 11. Records. The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of the services. 12. Authority. The Parties represent and warrant that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement. 13. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable for any reason, all remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Governing Law & Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation between the Parties, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 30 of 194 4 235985v2 15.Entire Agreement & Incorporation. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and each party acknowledges that no representations have been made or relied upon which are not specifically set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any oral or written agreements to the contrary made previously between the Parties. This Agreement includes by incorporation any Exhibits referenced in this Agreement. 16.Modification. No verbal agreement subsequent to the execution of this Agreement shall modify this Agreement. Any modification must be in writing and signed by all the Parties. 17.Attorney Representation. The Parties acknowledge and agree that they either had attorney representation with regards to this Agreement or acknowledge that they understood they had the right to attorney representation and hereby expressly waive that right. Each Party bears its own costs, expenses and attorney’s fees incurred with regards to the Parties’ disputes and differences unless otherwise specified in this Agreement. 18.No Implied Waiver. No waiver by either Party of any rights under this Agreement will be effective unless such waiver is in a writing signed by the Party against whom enforcement is sought. No delay or failure by either party to exercise any right, remedy or power herein shall impair such party's right to exercise such right, remedy or power or be construed to be a waiver of any default or an acquiescence therein; and any single or partial exercise of any such night, remedy or power shall not preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy or power. 19.Remedies Not Exclusive. Any right or remedy of either Party set forth in this Agreement shall not be exclusive, and, in addition thereto, both parties shall have all rights and remedies under applicable law, including without limitation, equitable relief. 20.Assignment. Neither Party may assign this agreement, or any rights or obligations hereunder, to any third party without the other Party’s written consent. 21.Notices. Any notices, required or permitted, under this Agreement shall be in writing. Such notices shall be deemed to be duly given or made if delivered by hand or by certified mail to the addresses of the Parties specified above. Either party may change its notice address or designee by providing the other party with written notice of such change in the manner specified in this paragraph. 22.Ambiguities. Any ambiguities in this agreement shall be interpreted according to its fair meaning and will not be strictly construed for or against any party. As such, the agreement will be construed as if drafted jointly by each party. 23.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, and all counterparts so executed shall constitute one agreement binding on all Parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the Effective Date first written above. Page 31 of 194 5 235985v2 CONTRACTOR: KINGSLEY FIRE CONSULTING LLC Roy Kingsley, Owner Date: , 2025 CITY: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor Date: , 2025 Cheryl Jacobson, City Administrator Date: , 2025 Page 32 of 194 6 235985v2 Exhibit A Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC will provide the following Services for the City of Mendota Heights: Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC will provide plan review and field inspection for all Types of Fire Protection systems within the Mendota Heights Fire Department’s area of protection. Plans will be reviewed, corrections noted as needed, and forwarded to the City Fire Marshal. Page 33 of 194 7 235985v2 Exhibit B The agreed-upon fee schedule for services provided by Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC: Kingsley Fire Consulting LLC will be paid the following rate: LABOR rate of 60.00 PER HOUR and Invoice on the first of the month as needed, and paid within 35 days of receipt by the City. The IRS travel rate of 70 cents per mile, FOR TRAVEL Page 34 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledge the July Par 3 Financial Report ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Trey Carlson, Recreation Facilities Coordinator Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation/Assistant Public Works Director ACTION REQUEST: Acknowledge the July Par 3 Financial Report. BACKGROUND: The Monthly Par 3 Dashboard is attached for Council review. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Monthly Expenditure-July is attached. ATTACHMENTS: 1.July 2025 2.July Financial Dashboard Par 3 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 35 of 194 MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT JULY 2025 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PAR 3 BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT July 2025 (58.33% OF YEAR) July REVENUES July YTD YTD YTD BUDGET 2025 2025 % 2024 GREENS, LEAGUE & TOURN FEES $220,000 $48,771 $176,787 80.36% $147,036 RECREATION PROGRAMS $50,000 $1,227 $43,645 87.29% $39,524 CONCESSIONS $36,000 $11,564 $32,674 90.76% $27,153 SUNDRY REVENUE $0 $58 $141 100.00% $206 INTEREST $1,000 $0 $0 0.00% $0 INSURANCE CLAIM $0 $0 $0 0.00% $0 PAR 3 FUND REVENUE TOTAL $307,000 $61,620 $253,248 82.49% $213,919 EXPENDITURES July YTD YTD YTD BUDGET 2025 2025 % 2024 CLUBHOUSE SALARIES $48,200 $7,550 $22,908 47.53% $26,664 ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES $69,821 $5,115 $28,815 41.27% $20,173 FICA/PERA $21,137 $2,153 $8,812 41.69% $6,562 MEDICAL INSURANCE $18,517 $1,543 $7,372 39.81% $4,401 U/E & W/C INSURANCE $3,900 $0 $8,687 222.75% $4,928 RENTALS $8,000 $1,910 $5,600 70.01% $4,282 UTILITIES $16,483 $833 $7,329 44.46% $6,609 PROFESSIONAL FEES - AUDIT $3,500 $0 $2,674 76.40% $1,536 PROF FEES - CONSULTING FEES $3,100 $0 $1,866 0.00% $696 PROF FEES - GROUNDS MGMT $7,250 $0 $0 0.00% $0 PROF FEES - GROUNDS WAGES $27,000 $3,207 $11,009 40.77% $11,373 PROF FEES - TREE MAINTENANCE $5,000 $0 $0 0.00% $0 LIABILITY/AUTO INSURANCE $5,000 $0 $4,495 89.90% $4,100 OPERATING COSTS/SUPPLIES $17,300 $1,317 $7,839 45.31% $6,787 FUEL $3,000 $380 $1,217 40.57% $1,262 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE $65,000 $4,119 $35,283 54.28% $45,798 SUNDRY/DUES/MILEAGE/CLOTHING $10,250 $63 $3,444 33.60% $3,084 ONLINE REG & CREDIT CARD FEES $11,600 $2,157 $8,353 72.01% $6,653 GREENS ROLLER $16,191 PAR 3 EXPENDITURES TOTAL $344,058 $30,348 $165,705 48.16% $171,099 Page 36 of 194 Mendota Heights Par 3 Community Golf Course July 2025—Financial Summary July—Tee Time Reservation Breakdown: Online Tee Times=2131 (57% of Total Tee Times) Phone/Walk in Tee Times= 1614 (43% of Total Tee Times) Year to Date Budget Overview—July: Current Operating Surplus as of July, 2025: $87,543 Operating Surplus as of July, 2024: $42,820 Monthly Revenues vs. Expenditures Month Revenues Expenditures Net March 2025 $14,117 $10,742 $3,375 April 2025 $35,483 $16,671 $18,812 May 2025 $51,764 $43,983 $7,781 June 2025 $64,636 $30,161 $34,475 July 2025 $61,620 $30,348 $31,272 Golf Round Totals: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 March 748 0 0 261 308 April 1678 896 1181 1923 2078 May 2285 2797 2923 2664 3043 June 2305 2839 3365 3395 3451 July 2673 3213 3753 3093 3565 Total 9689 9745 11222 11336 12454 Golf Rounds by Category: 2025 Regular Senior Junior Veteran Second Round Senior Pass Footgolf Punch Card March 127 8 10 0 1 2 0 160 April 984 129 95 3 36 33 8 790 May 1858 311 131 10 56 23 34 620 June 2011 383 246 12 47 15 27 710 July 2167 440 264 9 47 24 34 580 Total 7147 1271 746 34 187 97 103 2860 Category 2025 Budget 2025 YTD Actual % of Budget 2024 YTD Revenues $307,000 $253,248 82.49% $213,919 Expenditures $344,058 $165,705 48.16% $171,099 Net Position - $87,543 - $42,820 Page 37 of 194 Monthly Notes: o When accounting for total monthly rounds, staff track punch card sales as (10) rounds of golf. For note the following punch cards were sold: o March: 16 o April: 79 o May: 62 o June: 71 o July: 58 o The punch card rounds are then multiplied by 10 to get the total rounds tracked for that month: o March: 160 o April: 790 o May: 620 o June: 710 o July: 580 o When reporting the Tee Time Reservation Breakdown, the tee times booked reflect how the punch card rounds are used, thus, if someone buys a punch card in April, they may only use it four times. They also could use the punch card one time for a call-in tee time and three times for separate online tee times throughout the season Page 38 of 194 6.j REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to Provide Recycling Services ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation/Assistant Public Works Director ACTION REQUEST: Approve the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) between the Cities of Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Lilydale and Sunfish Lake for a shared recycling coordinator position with Mendota Heights acting as the fiscal agent. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved a JPA in January of 2017 with the Cities of West St. Paul and South St. Paul for a shared Recycling Coordinator position. Sunfish Lake joined the JPA in 2018 and Lilydale joined in 2019. Since 2017, the Recycling Coordinator position has been an employee of the City of West St. Paul. Based on increased need for sustainability initiative assistance within Mendota Heights, the City of Mendota Heights approved funding in the Preliminary budget for 2026 to take over the employment of the Recycling Coordinator and increase Mendota Heights' hours from 12 to 20. The additional eight hours will be allocated to the city's sustainability efforts (e.g. Green Steps, Partners in Energy), which have historically been understaffed. This position will also support the goals in the resiliency chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The allocation of hours for the Recycling Coordinator position for 2026 will be as follows: •Mendota Heights (8 Hours Grant Funded, 12 Hours Funded by City=20 Hours Total) •West St. Paul (9 Hours Grant Funded) •South St. Paul (9 Hours Grant Funded) •Lilydale (1 Hour Grant Funded) •Sunfish Lake (1 Hour Grant Funded) The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed JPA, and it has been shared with the partner Page 39 of 194 cities with no concerns moving forward. Upon approval of the JPA by all partner cities, the Grant Contract with Dakota County will need to be approved in November. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The JPA includes a net increase to the Mendota Heights recycling budget of approximately $7,000. This increase was approved in the 2026 Preliminary budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1.JPA - Recycling Services 091225 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 40 of 194 Page 1 of 7 237290v1 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE RECYCLING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made this _______ day of ___________ 2025 by and among the Cities of MENDOTA HEIGHTS, WEST ST. PAUL, SOUTH ST. PAUL, SUNFISH LAKE and LILYDALE (hereinafter individually referred to as a “City” and collectively referred to as the "Cities"). WHEREAS, Metropolitan counties are responsible for waste management policy and programs pursuant to Minn. Stat. §115A.551; and WHEREAS, Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance 110 requires each municipality in the County to have a solid waste abatement program that is consistent with the Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan); and WHEREAS, the Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan) governs all solid waste management in the County pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.46; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes local governmental units to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS, the County and the Cities each are governmental units as that term is defined in Minn. Stat. § 471.59; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits the Cities shall derive from this Agreement, the Cities hereby enter into this Agreement for the purposes stated herein. 1.AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 471.59. 2.PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide recycling services for the Cities. 3.WASTE ABATEMENT PROGRAM SERVICE. The City of Mendota Heights shall implement a waste abatement program (“Program”) as described in the Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Application (“Application”) for itself and the Cities of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake and Lilydale, attached hereto as Attachment A. If either the City of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, or Lilydale desire additional waste abatement services outside of those described in the Application, the City desiring the additional service(s) may enter into a separate agreement with Mendota Heights for those services and pay for those services with funds other than those awarded under any waste abatement grant. Page 41 of 194 Page 2 of 7 237290v1 4.FINANCE. A.The City of Mendota Heights shall act as the fiscal agent for the Cities and shall maintain a separate fund for the purpose of operating the Program. The City of Mendota Heights is authorized to pay Program expenses and receive reimbursements. For each calendar year of the Program, the City of Mendota Heights, following review and consultation with the other Cities, shall submit an application on behalf of the five Cities for a Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant. B.The City of Mendota Heights shall submit a reimbursement request that complies with the Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program Guidelines and Application and in the manner set forth in the COMMUNITY WASTE ABATEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT between Dakota County and the Cities. C.The City of Mendota Heights shall purchase equipment and supplies for the Program through procedures that are most beneficial to the Program. Contracts let and purchases made shall conform to statutory requirements applicable to the Cities. 5.CONTRIBUTIONS OF FACILITIES AND FUNDS BY CITIES. A.Each City shall determine which of its resources will be available to the Program, including specifically any facilities, equipment, funds or personnel to be made available for Program activities. As of the Effective Date, the Cities agree to a Shared Recycling Coordinator for purposes of performing the Services. The Cities shall use reasonable efforts to jointly resolve any work priority or performance conflicts with respect to the Recycling Coordinator, and any conflicts that cannot be resolved jointly will be resolved by Mendota Heights in its reasonable discretion. The Cities agree the Recycling Coordinator oversees the Program and intends to primarily work out of the Mendota Heights City Hall three days a week and West St. Paul City Hall two days a week, with the option to work remotely or flex time as outlined in the City of Mendota Heights Personnel Policy or as otherwise agreed to with the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director. The Cities will cooperate to establish a work schedule for the Recycling Coordinator. B.For such time as the Recycling Coordinator services are shared under this Agreement, the Recycling Coordinator will remain an employee of Mendota Heights. The City of Mendota Heights shall be solely responsible for the payment and provision of all wages, employee benefits, workers’ compensation insurance, and the withholding and payment of applicable payroll taxes relating to the Recycling Coordinator. The Recycling Coordinator will be provided a Mendota Heights city-issued laptop computer and phone. The Recycling Coordinator shall follow all Mendota Heights Information Technology policies. Page 42 of 194 Page 3 of 7 237290v1 C.The Cities anticipate that the Program will be fully funded by Dakota County with some City in-kind waste diversion activity or funding by each City as a percentage match determined by the County to the County’s funding. This funding will support 0.7 FTE of the Recycling Coordinator’s time. To meet their sustainability goals, the City of Mendota Heights will contribute additional funds to support the remaining 0.3 FTE of the Recycling Coordinators’ time. Together, the Dakota County grant and contributions from the City of Mendota Heights will support 1.0 FTE. D.The Cities will attempt to operate within the grant funding provided by Dakota County, but it is possible that the costs to operate the Program could potentially be higher than the grant funding provided. In the case of a grant funding shortage, Cities shall make up the funding deficit in the below manner for each situation described: 1)If costs are higher than funding: Mendota Heights shall alert the Cities as soon as it is aware that the potential exists for a funding shortage and shall attempt to make modifications to the services that still meet the requirements of the Program to offset the shortage prior to the shortage occurring. If measures cannot be taken to address the shortage, the shortage shall be made up by the Cities according to the grant funding percentage allocated to or on behalf of each City in relation to the total grant funding received by the Cities (as determined by the County’s grant funding allocation model). 2)If a City doesn’t provide its in-kind waste diversion activity or funds or accurately report it to Mendota Heights by required deadlines in accordance with County requirements, that City shall be responsible for any funding shortage associated with its lack of reporting or failure to provide its in-kind waste diversion. 6.PERSONNEL. The City of Mendota Heights shall establish standards and qualifications for its personnel. Mendota Heights’ Recycling Services personnel shall be deemed employees of the City of Mendota Heights, not of the other member Cities. Mendota Heights personnel shall be responsible for carrying out the Program and the terms and conditions of the Application and any resulting grant. The Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director will supervise the Recycling Coordinator with input from designated supervisory contacts in West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, and Lilydale. 7.INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION. A.General Liability Insurance. Each individual City agrees to maintain in force comprehensive general liability insurance equal to or greater than the maximum liability for tort claims under Minn. Stat. § 466.04. Each City shall maintain public liability insurance coverage on the Public Resources made available for the Program. If any City is notified that its insurance is cancelled, it will immediately Page 43 of 194 Page 4 of 7 237290v1 notify the other Cities in writing. If any City is unable to obtain or keep in force at least the minimum coverage required by this paragraph, any City may withdraw from this Agreement after giving the other member Cities at least thirty (30) days written notice of its intent to withdraw. Insurance Coverage does not waive any of the Cities’ protections under Chapter 466 of the Minnesota Statutes. B.Workers' Compensation Insurance. Each City shall be responsible for injuries to or death of its own employees. Each City shall maintain workers' compensation coverage or self-insurance coverage, covering its own employees while they are providing services pursuant to this agreement. Each City waives the right to sue any other City for any workers' compensation benefits paid to its own employee or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other City or its officers, employees or agents. C.Indemnification. Each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless (including reasonable attorney’s fees) the other party, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, demands, damages, personal injury, costs, judgments or expenses arising from any act or omission of the indemnifying party relating to the Project. No party shall be required to pay to any other party any amount as indemnification under this Agreement, whether arising pursuant to this Agreement, expressly, by operation of law or otherwise, in excess of the limits of liability applicable to the indemnifying party under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, or in the event that Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 does not apply, the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to the indemnifying party. In those instances in which a party is directly liable for damages as well as for indemnification to any other party, the combined liability of the indemnifying party shall not exceed the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or, in the event that Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 does not apply, the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to the indemnifying party. The Cities agree that liability under this Agreement is controlled by Minnesota Statute § 471.59, subdivision 1a, and that the total liability for the participating cities shall not exceed the limits on governmental liability for a single entity of government as specified in Minnesota Statute §466.04, subdivision 1. To the extent the services provided represent a joint undertaking of the parties, the total liability of the parties shall not exceed the liability limit of a single governmental unit as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59, subdivision 1a. No party agrees to accept liability for the acts or omissions of any other party. 8.DURATION. A.This Agreement shall commence as of the date of the last party to execute it and shall be on-going as provided herein. B.Any City may withdraw from this Agreement on December 31 of any year. Written notice of termination must be given to the other Cities at least ninety (90) days prior thereto. Page 44 of 194 Page 5 of 7 237290v1 C.Upon a City's withdrawal from the Agreement or termination of the Agreement, any resources will be promptly returned to the City that provided a resource to the Program. D.In the event of written notification to withdraw, the remaining Cities shall meet to consider modifying the Agreement to continue without the withdrawing City or to terminate. 9.PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED. This Agreement supersedes and repeals all prior agreements among the Cities related to the recycling service. Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties. 10.APPLICABLE LAW. This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of Minnesota. 12.NOTICES. Any notices required under this Agreement must be personally delivered or mailed to: City of Mendota Heights Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 City of West St. Paul Eric Weiss, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Environment 1616 Humboldt Ave West St. Paul, MN 55118 City of South St. Paul Monika Miller, Associate Planner 125 3rd Avenue N South St. Paul, MN 55075 City of Sunfish Lake Christy Wilcox, City Clerk/Administrator P.O. Box 18281 West St. Paul, MN 55118 City of Lilydale Mary Tollefson, City Administrator/City Clerk/Treasurer 1011 Sibley Memorial Hwy Lilydale, MN 55118 13.SEVERABILITY. Should any part of this Agreement be deemed illegal or non-binding by a court of law, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in effect. Page 45 of 194 Page 6 of 7 237290v1 14.COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 15.INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The Recitals at the beginning of this Agreement are each true and correct, and are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cities hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers. [Remainder of page left blank intentionally; Signature Page follows] Page 46 of 194 Page 7 of 7 237290v1 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE RECYCLING SERVICES Dated: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Clerk Dated: CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Clerk Dated: CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Clerk Dated: CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Clerk Dated: CITY OF LILYDALE BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Clerk Page 47 of 194 1 Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program 2026 Guidelines I.Grant Overview A.Municipalities in Dakota County have responsibilities to establish and maintain comprehensive local waste abatement programs to support implementation of the Dakota County 2024-2044 Solid Waste Management Plan (Management Plan). Dakota County provides educational, financial, and technical assistance to municipal governments to aid local waste abatement programs. The Dakota County Community Waste Abatement Grant Program (Program) assists municipalities with waste abatement expenses. II.Grant Eligibility A.Dakota County municipalities are eligible for the Program, excluding Dakota County townships and the cities of Coates, Empire, Hampton, Miesville, New Trier, Randolph, and Vermillion. B.Municipalities, other than those listed above, with fewer than 1,000 households are eligible for limited funding in specific categories. C.To be eligible for Municipal Facilities funding, municipality must have at least one municipal facility to verify or at least one employee to educate, other than the municipality’s primary contact for the Program (Municipality Primary Contact). D.To be eligible for Multiunit Recycling funding, municipality must have multiunit residential housing. III.Grant Funding Allocation and Match A.Funding amounts are determined annually by the County Board of Commissioners. B.Base Funding: Base Funding is allocated for required grant activities, including administration, residential communications, municipal facilities/parks verification and employee education, and special collections. C.Supplemental Funding: Optional Supplemental Funding is allocated for multiunit recycling, additional special collections, reduce/reuse activities, in-person education, event recycling, organics planning, and gap funding. D.Matching Funds: Eligible municipalities must provide a 25% match of the total reimbursed grant funding amount (Base Funding plus Supplemental Funding) through a cash match, in-kind contribution, or combination thereof, to pay for any activities that are instituted by the grant (i.e., any eligible expenses, whether new or ongoing). Any expenses that are not listed in these guidelines as Eligible Expenses are ineligible for matching funds unless pre-approved by the County Liaison. Page 48 of 194 2 E.Fund Eligibility Limits and Flexibility: a fund allocation maximum is set for each Base and Supplemental Funding grant category to align funding levels with Solid Waste Management Plan priorities, diversion potential, and other criteria, as defined in the Fund Allocation document. Fund allocations may be adjusted from one category to another, up to 10% per category, while not exceeding the total fund allocation for a given year, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. Funds cannot be moved into or out of Organics Planning. IV.Grant Application Instructions A.Conduct a planning process with communications, facilities, and event recycling staff and others who will be responsible for coordination and implementation, to collectively determine that activities included in the Application and Application Budget are feasible, realistic, and achievable. B.Complete the Application and the Application Budget, excluding areas for reporting. C.Include primary contact, secondary contact, and application reviewers for each municipality participating in the grant agreement. D.Use whole numbers for staff hours included in Application Budget. E.If multiple municipalities submit one Application, the Application Budget must itemize descriptions, costs, and funding requests for each municipality. Insert additional rows as needed. F.Submit Application and Application Budget by October 1, 2025 to County Liaison for review. Email to: gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us. G.Finalize Application with County Liaison and collect signature of authorized representative. H.Submit signed Application to County Liaison for approval. Email to: gena.gerard@co.dakota.mn.us. I.Obtain Grant Agreement from Dakota County. J.Execute Grant Agreement. V.Funding Requests Part 1: Base Funding Request (Required) 1.Grant Administration Required Activities: A.Fulfill responsibilities necessary for effective grant administration and demonstrate performance of waste abatement programs. Page 49 of 194 3 B.Ensure named Municipality Primary Contact is properly trained to fulfill grant responsibilities by attending the Dakota County Recycling Ambassador course. C.Participate in solid waste management training to support effective implementation of grant activities, including at minimum: 1.Annual RAM/SWANA conference 2.Association of Recycling Managers (ARM) meetings 3.Annual ARM workshop D.Ensure Municipality Primary Contact attends the six Program meetings hosted by Dakota County. E.Refer businesses, schools, multiunit properties, and other organizations to county Program Managers to coordinate all requests for resources (e.g., education, containers, labels). F.Provide reasonable support to implement the Solid Waste Management Plan, including but not limited to: 1.Share city license list of any vape/tobacco stores with County Liaison for purposes of county education on proper used vape/battery management. 2.Update local codes as appropriate to be consistent with and no less restrictive than County Ordinance 110. G.Demonstrate Program compliance and waste abatement metrics in mid-year and final reports that include information for all Base and Supplemental funded projects, as described in Reporting and Reimbursement below. H.Submit reimbursement requests by county deadlines with substantiating documentation, as described in Reporting and Reimbursement below. Optional Activities: I.Participate in the annual RAM compost bin sale. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage of municipal personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Solid waste training and professional memberships to support effective implementation of Base Funding or Supplemental Funding activities. C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news, printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement standardized messaging. D.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. Page 50 of 194 4 2. Residential Communications Required Activities: A.Mail county-developed articles on each of the following themes to all residential households, with a half page minimum per topic: 1.Home recycling 2.Household hazardous waste management (The Recycling Zone) 3.Food scraps reduction or management 4.Reduce/reuse opportunities B.Post at least one county-developed waste abatement social media message per month using county-provided messaging (e.g., county messaging toolkit, share county media posts). C.Request county approval of any proposed modifications to county-developed articles or social media posts at least two weeks before the municipal deadline for printing or publishing. D.Stock brochure racks at city-owned/operated facilities with county-provided waste abatement print materials (i.e., What Goes Where guides, Fix-It-Clinic flyers, etc.). E.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents including use county translated waste abatement messaging/materials as appropriate. F.Maintain waste management information on the municipal website following county guidance in coordination with the County Liaison, keeping information and links current. G.Serve as a resource to residents on waste abatement-related inquiries (e.g., email, phone). H.Provide funding source credit on all print materials, written as: Partially funded by Dakota County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Percentage of cost for design, production, and postage for municipality newsletter devoted to waste abatement articles on topics listed in Required Activities above using county standardized messaging articles and images. C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news, printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement standardized messaging. D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. E.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. Page 51 of 194 5 3. Municipal Facilities Required Activities: A.Provide verification of best waste management practices and recycling compliance at least once annually, by visually inspecting and reporting status using the Municipal Facilities Recycling Tool. B.Provide county-required recycling educational messaging to each municipal employee, volunteer, tenant, and custodial/housekeeping staff who generates and sorts trash and recycling, within 30 days of hire and at least annually thereafter. C.Conduct in-person training on recycling requirements for municipalities with city personnel who are responsible for (a) recycling container placement and monitoring on city-owned/operated property, (b)emptying trash, recycling, and organics containers on city-owned/operated property, (c) handling event permits or facility rental applications, and (d) staffing events subject to city recycling requirements. Optional Activities: D.Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to educate municipal leaders and employees about the local recycling and waste management system. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Copying and printing waste abatement education materials for municipal employees and vendors, using county messaging standards. C.Fees for tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities. D.Interpretive services. E.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 4.Special Collections Required Activities: A.Implement collections of all of the following materials that are challenging for residents to recycle or compost, using the method specified, with an independent collection for each city having 1,000 households or more and a co-collection for each city having fewer than 1,000 households (i.e., in collaboration with an adjacent city): 1.Holiday lights: free collection for recycling during and after winter holidays Page 52 of 194 6 2.Mattresses and box springs: drop off discount for recycling and reuse, curbside pickup discount for recycling and reuse, or one-day collection, with reuse required for materials in good condition 3.Paper: free collection for shredding and recycling confidential documents 4.Pumpkins: free collection for composting after Halloween 5.Scrap metal: free or partly-subsidized collection for recycling if city hosts a cleanup day B.Implement a free collection of yard signs for recycling after fall elections, as a single-city or multi-city event (i.e., in collaboration with one or more adjacent cities). C.Promote all city-led special collections through social media, videos, e-news, print media, or other outreach/media channels, specifying how materials will be managed (i.e., recycling, reuse, or both). D.Request and report weights, cubic yards, or number of units for each material collected, as specified on the county reporting tool. E.Coordinate timing of special collections with County Liaison to prevent duplication of effort, timing overlap, conflicting messages, pricing conflicts, and confusion for residents. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities (i.e., for collection of materials listed above). B.Vendor services, less resident fees, to collect materials listed above with confirmed delivery to a reuse location or to a licensed recycling/organics facility, or to another facility approved by the County Liaison. C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news, printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement standardized messaging. D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. E.Equipment (e.g., grabbers) and personal protective equipment for volunteers working on collections for materials listed above. F.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County Liaison. Part 2: Supplemental Funding Request (Optional) 5.Multiunit Recycling Required Activities: Page 53 of 194 7 A.Provide technical assistance for participants in the Dakota County Multiunit Recycling Program by: 1.Conducting broad-based outreach through multiple communication channels 2.Reaching out to an agreed-upon number of potential new participants and past participants in coordination with the County Liaison 3.Responding to requests for assistance 4.Completing needs assessments, applications, and data-collection mechanisms 5.Implementing infrastructure and education plans 6.Advancing site-specific solutions for increased waste diversion, waste reduction, and reuse B.Maintain an annually updated list of addresses and contacts for multiunit properties that are eligible for the Program, and share with Dakota County. C.Provide an annual mailing about Program resources to multiunit property managers and/or owners in coordination with County Liaison. Optional Activities: D.Coordinate with the County Liaison to revise multiunit recycling mechanisms (e.g., business license renewals, rental license renewals, rental inspections, fire inspections, and property manager meetings) and municipal planning and construction procedures to support recycling in new or remodeled buildings (e.g., recycling chutes, adequate space), consistent with city recycling codes and county ordinances. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 6.Reduce/Reuse Activities Required Activities: A.Host a free drop box for donations of reusable athletic equipment if there are no permanent physical locations to reuse (e.g. donate, buy, sell, exchange) within the city. B.Promote existing reuse opportunities for athletic equipment, furniture, and building materials (e.g., curbside pickup, drop-off, online exchange, other), through two or more of the following: social media, videos, e-news, print media, or other outreach/media channels. C.Promote city-led reuse opportunities for optional materials in (H) through at least one outreach/media channel. Page 54 of 194 8 D.Obtain and report weights for each material collected, donated, or exchanged, as specified on the county reporting tool. E.Ensure that usable leftover items are donated or reused after each city-led reuse opportunity, to the extent possible. F.Track and report number of people participating in all staffed reuse activities by monitoring participation using a sign-in sheet or clicker. G.Provide updates to the online Dakota County Reduce & Reuse Map. Optional Activities: H.Implement free or low-cost reuse opportunities (e.g., swap event, collection for donation, curbside pickup discount, drop box) for materials that are challenging for residents to reuse, along with an interactive educational activity for in-person events (i.e., as described in 7A), using the best method of reuse based on data available. Preference must be given to materials and methods that meet all of the following criteria, with priority given to building materials and furniture, and a limit of one activity per city for materials that do not meet these criteria: 1.Significant diversion – at least 0.5 ton per event or activity 2.Fills a gap – no permanent physical location to reuse (e.g., donate, buy, sell, exchange) within the city 3.Convenient and accessible – including consideration for transportation and physical barriers 4.Confirmed reuse outlet and end use 5.Does not duplicate, interfere, or compete with private sector services I.Attend Reuse Minnesota meetings. J.Attend Responsible Public Purchasing Council meetings. K.Switch to reusable dishware (e.g., washable dishes and silverware) at permanent city-owned facilities. L.Provide and collect reusable dishware (e.g., washable baskets, cups) at community events on city property with at least 300 attendees to reduce single-use products use. M.Provide assistance at Dakota County Fix-It Clinics held in the city, if applicable. N.Host residential reduce, reuse, or repair education classes using county messaging, ensuring all hired educators are approved in advance by the County Liaison, and reporting on outcomes by monitoring presentation attendance (e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar attendance (e.g., number of people who log on), table interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet). O.Facilitate changes to municipality policies to increase reuse opportunities in the community (e.g., clothing drop box prohibitions, rental companies, and secondhand stores) or internal operations (e.g., office supplies, equipment). P.Other as approved by County Liaison (e.g., repair event or coupon). Page 55 of 194 9 Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities described in Required and Optional Activities above). B.Vendor services, less resident fees, to collect materials listed above at a residential drop-off day, event, or permanent collection option (drop-off site, curbside collection) with confirmed delivery to a reuse, recycling, or organics facility. C.Fees for production or usage of outreach media and materials (e.g., social media, videos, e-news, printing, graphic design, advertisements, billboards, television, radio) using waste abatement standardized messaging. D.Reuse training and professional memberships to support effective implementation of reduction/reuse activities. E.Fees for county-approved professional educators and performers who help implement required education activities on topics listed above and comply with county messaging standards. F.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. G.Washable dishware to replace single-use products, as described in Optional Activities above. H.Dishwasher up to $2,000 at city-owned facilities, including dishwashing carts and racks; must be Energy Star qualified. I.County-approved promotional items or professional services up to $500 in value that create minimal waste and engage residents in reduce/reuse activities described above. J.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 7.In-Person Education Required Activities: A.Provide resident waste abatement education at events or gatherings, in person or online, to educate at least 1% of the municipality’s population through interactive activities between city staff and residents (e.g., ed kits, games, conversations, teaching, presentations), on all four of the following topics, with a focus on one or two topics per event; does not include display views or brochure distribution: 1.Home recycling 2.Residential food scraps drop site(s) 3.The Recycling Zone services 4.Local reduce/reuse opportunities (e.g., repair) Page 56 of 194 10 B.Promote city-led education opportunities in (A) through at least one outreach/media channel. C.Ensure all staff and volunteers who implement In-Person Education activities are properly trained to fulfill responsibilities by attending the Dakota County Recycling Ambassador course and using current county messaging. D.Ensure all professional educators who implement In-Person Education activities are approved in advance by County Liaison. E.Use county education materials, display materials, and presentation slides. F.Coordinate with County Liaison for any education requests in schools, businesses, and multiunit residences. G.Expand waste abatement outreach to engage diverse/underserved residents including using county translated waste abatement messaging/materials as appropriate. H.Track and report number of people educated in person by monitoring presentation participation (e.g., sign-in sheet or head count), online webinar participation (e.g., number of people who log on), verbal tabling activity interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet), and game interactions (e.g., clicker or tally sheet). Optional Activities: I.Conduct tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities to educate residents about the local recycling and waste management system. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities (i.e., only activities described in Required and Optional Activities above; does not include brochure distribution, or any activities lacking an educational in-person or online face-to-face interaction and direct learning experience). B.Tablecloths, table runners, banners, signage, sign boards, stands, brochure holders, and other materials needed for engagement and education. C.Event, booth, and room rental fees. D.Fees for county-approved professional educators and performers who help implement required education activities on topics listed above and comply with county messaging standards. E.Fees for tours of recycling, composting, or landfill facilities. F.County-approved promotional items or professional services up to $500 in value that create minimal waste and engage residents in education activities described above. G.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. Page 57 of 194 11 H.Interpretive services. I.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 8.Event Recycling Required Activities: A.Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection, or both, at events, tournaments, and festivals held on city-owned property: 1.Contact and assist city event coordinators to plan and implement recycling collection. 2.Provide an appropriate number of co-located recycling and trash containers in strategic locations to prevent overflow, along with proper bags and signage. 3.Provide required county waste abatement messaging to educate vendors, volunteers, and custodial staff about event recycling requirements. B.Offer resources for recycling, back-of house organics (food scraps) collection, or both, at household parties (i.e., non-city events) upon request. C.Update two or more municipal forms (e.g., event permit, event vendor agreement, facility rental agreement) using county model messaging to include recycling requirements for events, tournaments, and festivals, consistent with city codes and county ordinance. Optional Activities: D.Add waste abatement infrastructure (i.e., recycling and organics containers, lids, labels, and signage) in municipality-controlled facilities (e.g., buildings, parks, and roadways) where containers are needed and have not yet been placed, (i.e., replacing containers is an ineligible expense) using the county-developed container purchasing checklist. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.X-frame containers, X-Frame bags for recyclables, grabbers, green five-gallon buckets, signage, promotion, and other materials necessary for successful project implementation at events. C.Recycling hauling services of collected materials from city events, tournaments, and festivals, with confirmed delivery to a facility licensed to manage the material. D.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. E.Recycling and organics containers or multi-stream containers, lids, lanyards, and labels/signage necessary to fulfill Optional Activities described above, consistent with the county-developed Page 58 of 194 12 container purchasing checklist. Trash receptacles are only eligible as part of a multi-stream container (i.e., the Program does not fund stand-alone trash containers). F.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 9.Organics Planning Optional Activities: A.Support research and planning for residential curbside organics collection. B.Support research and planning for new organics drop sites. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage of municipal personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Consultant services or stipend for an individual, organization, or group to provide assistance. C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities, with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 10.Gap Funding Required Activities: A.Complete, or make progress toward completing, one or more waste abatement projects included in eligible grant categories above, for which additional funding is needed, with first priority given to filling funding gaps in Base Funding categories, second priority given to filling gaps in Supplemental Funding categories, and third priority given to conducting waste abatement activities that are not included in Base Funding or Supplemental Funding, with prior written County Liaison approval. Eligible Expenses: A.Salary, benefits, and mileage for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working directly on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. B.Expenses for completion of projects that are eligible, as defined in Required Activities, Optional Activities, and Eligible Expenses sections. C.Other expenses to administer grant-funded activities with prior written approval from the County Liaison. Page 59 of 194 13 VI.Ineligible Expenses The following expenses are ineligible for funding: A.Expenses that are not specified as an eligible expense above, unless written approval has been obtained from the County Liaison. B.Expenses related to non-waste abatement waste issues (e.g., energy, water, sustainability). C.Expenses related to land disposal of materials, and collection and management of banned materials, trash, hazardous and household hazardous waste and business waste, unless specifically identified above (e.g., residential compact fluorescent bulb collection, multi-stream containers). D.Expenses related to city code amendments and enforcement (e.g., code compliance administration, inspections). E.Municipality-generated waste management. F.Infrastructure purchases (e.g., containers, bags) as part of Organics Planning. G.Dishwasher replacement, electrical costs, and plumbing costs related to dishwasher installation. H.Design/print of education and communications print materials not described above, unless prior written approval has been obtained from the County Liaison. I.Translation services. J.Out-of-state meals, travel, and lodging. K.Office supplies and equipment including phone charges, website host fees, and consultant fees. L.Installation and labor costs related to equipment purchase, service costs or plans such as extended warranties, and replacement of existing equipment such as dishwashers, refrigerators/freezers, and water filling stations. M.Extended leave, defined as a formal leave of absence for a special circumstance (e.g., childbirth, caring for an ill family member, health condition, military leave) approved by the city, for voluntary or mandatory (e.g., performance) reasons. VII.Reporting and Reimbursement Required Activities: A.By July 15, 2026, municipality shall submit a mid-year report and reimbursement request form for the first six months of 2025, on forms provided by the County Liaison. B.By January 15, 2027, municipality shall submit a final report and reimbursement request form for the last six months of 2026, on forms provided by the County Liaison. Page 60 of 194 14 C.Mid-year and final reports shall include time spent on each category, and for each city if applicable, for municipality personnel, both permanent and temporary, while working directly on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities during the reimbursement period. D.Report and reimbursement request forms must be signed by the Authorized Representative (i.e., contract signatory) for the grant agreement, or by other designee who is independent of municipality personnel who work directly on the planning, implementing, promoting, and reporting of eligible activities. E.Reimbursement requests must be for eligible expenses, less revenues or other monies received, incurred in connection with the performance of grant activities. F.Reimbursement requests must be supported by documentation that includes expense dates, vendors, items purchased, and amounts – such as vendor invoices, receipts, or detailed financial reports produced using municipal accounting software – itemizing all expenses related to the grant, including salary and benefits, with photos of purchased containers and placement, in-person education events with tables, and special collections for recycling, organics, or reuse. Any reimbursement request for multiple municipalities must separately itemize the request for reimbursement for each individual municipality. G.Salary and benefits cannot exceed the total amount budgeted for salary and benefits in the Application unless reasonable justification is provided and approved by County Liaison in advance. H.Activities outlined in the Application and contained in the Grant Agreement represent municipality’s obligations, and it is the county’s expectation that the Grant Agreement will be fully implemented. Municipality must contact County Liaison to make workable adjustments as needed during the contract period and proactively address any implementation challenges as they arise. I.Changes to Application activities and related expenses require prior approval from the County Liaison, as described in the Grant Agreement. Page 61 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.k REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Request for Proposals for a Geothermal Assessment of the city's Public Works Facility ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator ACTION REQUEST: Approve the Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Geothermal Assessment of the city's Public Works Facility and authorize staff to release the RFP to qualified consultants. BACKGROUND: On March 4, 2025 the City Council approved a letter of authorization for a Geothermal Planning Grant Application from the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The program provides financial assistance to local government units to examine the technical and economic feasibility of geothermal energy systems. The City was notified that the City has been awarded up to $150,000 for the feasibility and planning of a potential future geothermal energy system that would heat and cool the city's Public Works Facility. A Request for Proposals (RFP) has been developed to hire a consulting firm with experience in the field of Geothermal Energy to help fulfill the requirements of the project as well as grant requirements and procedures. The consultant will be required to conduct the following work for the City: 1) An analysis of the heating and cooling demand of the Public Works facility that would consume energy from the geothermal energy system; 2) An evaluation of the equipment that could be combined with a geothermal energy system to meet the building's heating and cooling requirements; 3) An analysis of the geologic conditions of the earth in which a geothermal energy system operates, including the drilling of one or more test wells to characterize geologic materials and to measure properties of the earth and aquifers that impact the feasibility of installing and operating a geothermal energy system; and 4) Preparation of a financial analysis of the geothermal energy system for the project By releasing the Request for Proposals, the City has no obligation to implement or install a Page 62 of 194 geothermal system. The RFP simply seeks proposals from qualified consultants to move forward on this study. Request for proposals will be due to the City on November 5 and will be brought back to the City Council for consideration on November 18. The approximate project start date is January 1, 2026 and has a final content deadline from the consultant will be January 1, 2027. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: There is no cost associated with the release of the RFP. ATTACHMENTS: 1.2025_9_22 Geothermal Planning DRAFT RFP 2.Authorize Letter of Approval for Geothermal Planning Grant Application 030425 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 63 of 194 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Geothermal Assessment CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS October 8, 2025 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Page 64 of 194 CONTENTS A. Purpose of Request B. Background C. Project Description D. Project Deliverables E. Project Management F. Sharing of Information G. Project Schedule H. Selection Criteria I. Proposals J. Other Terms and Conditions K. Proposal Submittal A. PURPOSE OF REQUEST The City of Mendota Heights hereby solicits and requests proposals for Geothermal Planning and Analysis Services at its Public Works Facility. These services will be funded, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Proposals are being solicited from consulting firms with experience and the ability to fulfill the requirements of the project as well as grant requirements and procedures. The consulting firm should have the staff expertise and capability to provide complete, comprehensive, data and services to fulfill the requirements of the project for the City of Mendota Heights. B. BACKGROUND The purpose of the scope of services is to plan for the future installation of a geothermal energy system for the heating and cooling of a 25,262 square-foot public works facility, located at 2431 Lexington Avenue South in Mendota Heights, MN. The ultimate goal of this project is to convert the building’s systems for heating and cooling to a geothermal energy system. Eligible planning activities (DELIVERABLES) for this proposal include: 1) Analysis of the heating and cooling demand of the public building that would consume energy from the geothermal energy system; 2) Evaluation of equipment that could be combined with a geothermal energy system to meet the building's heating and cooling requirements; 3) Analysis of the geologic conditions of the earth in which a geothermal energy system operates, including the drilling of one or more test wells to characterize geologic materials and to measure properties of the earth and aquifers that impact the feasibility of installing and operating a geothermal energy system; and 4) Preparation of a financial analysis of the geothermal energy system for the project. C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Overview The City of Mendota Heights is seeking consultation and implementation services to complete the requirements described in Section B. of this Request for Proposals. Page 65 of 194 D.PROJECT DELIVERABLES Project deliverables must include all planning activities described in Section B. of this RFP, as well as complying with all requirements of the MN Department of Commerce Geothermal Planning Grant Program (attached). E.PROJECT MANAGEMENT The project manager is Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator for the City of Mendota Heights. All direction to the consultant will be delivered through the project manager. The awarded consultant may also work with Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director for the city, Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City Engineer, as well as John Boland, Public Works Supervisor for the city, as needed. F.SHARING OF INFORMATION The consultant shall host a permanent file sharing site to allow the project management team to share and receive files. G. PROJECT SCHEDULE 1.RFP Issued October 8, 2025 2.Question Period October 8 – October 22, 2025 3.Proposals received by City of Mendota Heights at 5PM on November 5, 2025 4.Review of proposals upon submittal – November 5 – November 10, 2025 5.Execution of Contract November 18, 2025 (Upon City Council Approval) 6.Approximate Project Start January 1, 2026 (Project start must occur after grant contract execution between the City and the State of MN) 7.Final content delivered January 1, 2027 H. SELECTION CRITERIA Submitted proposals will be rated on how well a firm has demonstrated: 1.Understanding of project requirements and proposed approach. 2.Familiarity with the requirements of conducting a full site assessment for geothermal energy system installation, as well as experience taking an active role in the installation process. 3.Experience in similar projects. 4.Qualifications of project staff. 5.Ability to meet the timeline. 6.Proposed fee for each of the final deliverables and total project fee. I. PROPOSALS Proposals provided shall include: 1.Statement of understanding stating the requirements of the project and a description of services to be provided. 2.Description of your firm’s familiarity with the work required as part of the project. 3.Relevant project experience, and list of any comparable projects or services that the consultant has recently completed as well as any provided references and how they may be viewed. 4.Identification of Staff to be utilized throughout the project and their specific roles, as well as related experience and qualifications. Page 66 of 194 5.Identification of any outside firms, contractors, or subcontractors that your firm may utilize throughout the process. 6.Description of your proposed strategy, work plan, and budget for achieving the project objectives. 7.Timeline and schedule of work for your firm’s proposal, including periodic progress review. 8.Detailed, proposed cost estimate for completing the project, including any time and materials. Proposals shall include proposed compensation for the work with proposed hourly rates and total costs for each specific deliverable identified within this RFP. J. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1.All proposals and related materials become the property of the City upon receipt and shall not be returned to the proposer. 2.The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. The City also specifically reserves the right to negotiate with proposers to modify the scope of the work. 3.All materials submitted in response to this RFP shall ultimately become public record. 4.Work is not to begin until Notice to Proceed has been given by the City’s Public Works Director. 5.Upon contract finalization, assignment of the work to others beyond those identified must be approved by the City in writing. 6.Any and all potential conflicts of interest shall be identified. 7.All work will be compensated at hourly rates subject to a not-to-exceed-without-prior authorization limit proposed by the consultant. 8.No compensation is provided for development or submission of the proposal. 9.Contract will be executed between Mendota Heights and a prime consultant firm. In the case of a project team of multiple consultants, a prime consultant firm shall be responsible for subcontracting with other consultant firms. There will be no legal relationship with Mendota Height sand the subcontracting consultant firms. 10.Parties to the Contract: A contract will be executed between Mendota Heights and a prime consultant firm. In the case of a project team of multiple consultants, a prime consultant firm shall be responsible for subcontracting with the other consultant firms. There will be no legal relationship with Mendota Heights and the subcontracting consultant firms. The prime and subcontracting consultant firms shall be responsible in providing the required submission information via a single proposal. 11.Reimbursable Expenses: Reimbursable expenses are expenses attributed directly to the project and will be billed at actual costs up to, but not exceeding the estimate given in your Fee Proposal. No mark-up is allowed on these costs. Internal printing costs and local transportation/travel are to be included in the fee proposal and are not reimbursable expenses. 12.Payments: Billing for completed services shall be based upon a monthly invoice submitted by the Consultant. 13.Addenda/Clarifications: Any changes to this RFP will be made by the City through a written addendum. No verbal modification will be binding. 14.Contract Award: Issuance of this RFP and receipt of proposals do not commit the City to the awarding of the contract. The City reserves the right to postpone opening for its own convenience, to accept or reject any or all proposals received in response to this RFP, to negotiate with other than the selected Consultant should negotiations with the selected Consultant be terminated, to negotiate with more than one Consultant simultaneously, or to cancel all or part of this RFP. 15.City Rights: The City may investigate the qualifications of any consultant under consideration, require confirmation of information furnished by the consultant, and require additional evidence of qualifications, to perform the work described in this RFP. The City reserves the right to: a.Reject any or all proposals if such action is in the public interest; b.Cancel the entire Request for Proposals; Page 67 of 194 c.Issue a subsequent Request for Proposals; d.Remedy technical errors in a Request for Proposal process; e.Appoint evaluation committees to review the proposals; f.Establish a short list of consultants eligible for interview after evaluation of proposals; g.Negotiate with any, all, or none of the RFP consultants; and h.Reject and replace one or more subconsultants. 16.Independent Price Determination: Applicants are held legally responsible for their information and fees. Applicants are not to collaborate, for the purpose of restricting competition, with other applicants or competitors in developing proposals and fees. 17.Independent Contractor Status: The Consultant will be an independent consultant, and nothing contained in any contract awarded shall be construed to create the relationship of employer and employee between the City and the Consultant. The Consultant is not eligible for workers’ or unemployment compensation benefits. The Consultant understands that no withholding or deduction for state or federal income taxes, FICA, FUTA, or otherwise, will be made from payments due the Consultant and that it is the Consultant’s sole obligation to comply with the applicable provisions of all federal and state tax laws. 18.Public Records and Requests for Confidentiality: Pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 13.591, the names of all entities that submitted a timely bid/proposal to Mendota Heights will be public once opened. All other information remains private until Mendota Heights has completed negotiating a contract with the selected Responder. After a contract has been negotiated, all information received is public information except “trade secret” information as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 13.37. All information submitted by a Responder therefore shall be treated as public information by Mendota Heights unless the Responder properly requests that information be treated as a confidential trade secret at the time of submitting the bid/proposal. Any request for confidential treatment of trade secret information in a Responder’s proposal must sufficiently describe the facts that support the classification of information as confidential trade secret. The request must include the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the Responder to answer any inquiries by Mendota Heights concerning the request for confidentiality. The envelope or mailing container of any documents submitted with the proposal that the Responder believes contain confidential trade secret information must be clearly marked as containing confidential trade secret information. Each page upon which trade secret information appears must be marked as containing confidential trade secret information. In addition to marking the documents as confidential, the Responder must submit one paper and one digital copy of the proposal from which the confidential trade secret information has been excised. The confidential trade secret information must be excised in such a way as to allow the public to determine the general nature of the information removed while retaining as much of the document as possible. Requests by the public for the release of information held by Mendota Heights are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. Responders are encouraged to familiarize themselves with these provisions prior to submitting a proposal. Page 68 of 194 By submitting this bid or proposal, Responder agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action relating to the City’s withholding of data based upon reliance on the representations that the information is a trade secret as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 13.37 and therefore is not public, including the payment of all costs and attorney fees incurred by the City in defending such an action. K. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL This Request for Proposals (RFP) document is available upon request to respondents in hard copy and/or PDF formats. Submittals and requests for the RFP documents should be made to: Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 (651) 255-1123 KSpreiter@Mendotaheightsmn.gov Any questions regarding the proposal may be directed to Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator using the contact information provided above. Proposals documents should be submitted as one (1) digital copy and must not exceed twenty (20) pages (font size 11). Work guaranties will be in the form of a signed contract between the awarded consultant and the City of Mendota Heights. Certificate(s) of Insurance must be furnished as a part of the final contract negotiations. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS ARE DUE BY November 5, 2025, AT 5:00 PM. Page 69 of 194 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: March 4, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Authorize Letter of Approval for Geothermal Planning Grant Application ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Natural Resources CONTACT: Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator ACTION REQUEST: Authorize signing of letter of approval for the pursuit of a Geothermal Planning Grant. BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Commerce is seeking proposals from local government units for geothermal project planning throughout Minnesota for the Geothermal Planning Grant Program. The intent of the program is to provide financial assistance to local government units to examine the technical and economic feasibility for installation of geothermal energy systems. The Sustainability Committee of the City's Natural Resources Commission recently began conversations regarding the program and how it fits with their goal of achieving sustainable initiatives for the city. The city is in the process of implementing its Energy Action Plan as part of its partnership with Xcel Energy through the Partners in Energy program. The Energy Action Plan was developed in partnership with Xcel Energy and the city's Energy Action Team, consisting of residents, business owners, students, Natural Resources Commission members, and city staff. Exploring the possibility of implementing a geothermal system at one or more of the city's public facilities fits well with the goals of the city's recently adopted Energy Action Plan. The city is requesting $130,000 from the MN Department of Commerce as part of its geothermal planning grant application. City staff met with Darcy Solutions, a geothermal system installer, to learn more about geothermal energy and details of installation. Darcy Solutions completed a preliminary assessment of the city's Public Works facility, and determined that a geothermal project would be feasible at this facility. The city has also reached out to other municipalities and government agencies that have had experience with installing geothermal systems. If accepted Page 70 of 194 Attachment 2 into the grant program, project implementation would be assessed after findings of the investigation are reported to, and discussed with City Council. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The city will not offer grant match funds as part of the application unless the council wishes to include matching funds. Matching funds are not included in the 2025 city budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Authorization CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship Page 71 of 194 March 4, 2025 MN Department of Commerce RE: Letter of Authorization –Geothermal Planning Grant Program Application The City of Mendota Heights authorizes the Primary Contact, Krista Spreiter, Natural Resources Coordinator to pursue the Geothermal Planning Grant Program Application. The Sustainability Committee of the city's Natural Resources Commission has recently begun conversations regarding the Geothermal Planning Grant program and how it can work towards their goal of achieving sustainable initiatives for the city. The city is in the process of implementing its Energy Action Plan as part of its partnership with Xcel Energy through the Partners in Energy program. The Energy Action Plan was developed in partnership with Xcel Energy and the city's Energy Action Team, consisting of residents, business owners, students, Natural Resources Commission members, and staff. Exploring the possibility of implementing a geothermal system at one or more of the city's public facilities fits well with the goals of the city's recently adopted Energy Action Plan. This grant opportunity would allow the city to explore the possibility of installing a geothermal energy system and therefore continue to work towards its goal of implementing sustainable energy practices whenever feasible. Thank you for your consideration. The City of Mendota Heights is excited about the opportunity to partner with your efforts and is confident in our ability to meet its energy goals. Sincerely, Stephanie Levine Mayor Page 72 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 6.l REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledge Quarterly Budget and Building Activity Reports ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director ACTION REQUEST: Acknowledge Quarterly Budget and Building Activity Reports BACKGROUND: The city's budget is based on a calendar fiscal year. Attached are the first and second quarter Budget to Actual and Building Activity reports for city council review. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1.1Q 2Q budget to actual 2.1Q 2Q building activity CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 73 of 194 Page 74 of 194 Page 75 of 194 Page 76 of 194 Page 77 of 194 Page 78 of 194 Page 79 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank Page 80 of 1946.m Page 81 of 194 Page 82 of 194 Page 83 of 194 Page 84 of 194 Page 85 of 194 Page 86 of 194 Page 87 of 194 Page 88 of 194 Page 89 of 194 Page 90 of 194 Page 91 of 194 Page 92 of 194 Page 93 of 194 Page 94 of 194 Page 95 of 194 Page 96 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 9.a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-63 Authorizing the Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A, Pledging for the Security Thereof Special Assessments and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-63 Authorizing the Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A, Pledging for the Security Thereof Special Assessments and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof BACKGROUND: At the September 2, 2025, City Council meeting, the Council authorized the public sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds. This issue will be financing the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements. The proposal opening will be held on October 7, 2025. The results of the opening will be presented and Council will take action on the sale at the October 7, 2025, City Council meeting. A representative from Ehlers will be present to provide a tabulation of the bids received. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The bonds will be paid with a combination of special assessments and an amount levied each year for the annual bond payments. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Mendota Heights Resolution 2025-63 Authorizing the Issuance and Awarding the Sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 97 of 194 176670284v1 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA HELD: OCTOBER 7, 2025 Pursuant to due call, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on October 7, 2025, at 6:00 P.M., for the purpose, in part, of authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member _______________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-63 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND AWARDING THE SALE OF $2,820,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2025A, PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF A.WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "City") has heretofore determined and declared that it is necessary and expedient to issue $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A (the "Bonds" or individually, a "Bond"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 429 to finance the Friendly Hills street rehabilitation and water main replacement project in the City (the "Improvements"); and B.WHEREAS, the Improvements and all their components have been ordered prior to the date hereof, pursuant to the procedural requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and C.WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the sale of the Bonds and was therefore authorized to sell the Bonds by private negotiation in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9) and proposals to purchase the Bonds have been solicited by Ehlers; and D.WHEREAS, the proposals set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto were received by the City Clerk, or designee, at the offices of Ehlers at 9:30 A.M. this same day pursuant to the Preliminary Official Statement for the Bonds, dated September 25, 2025; and E.WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City that the Bonds be issued in book- entry form as hereinafter provided; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: Page 98 of 194 176670284v1 2 1.Acceptance of Proposal. The proposal of _____________________________ (the "Purchaser"), to purchase the Bonds in accordance with the Preliminary Official Statement, at the rates of interest hereinafter set forth, and to pay therefor the sum of $_____________, plus interest accrued to settlement, is hereby found, determined and declared to be the most favorable proposal received and is hereby accepted and the Bonds are hereby awarded to the Purchaser. The Finance Director is directed to retain the deposit of the Purchaser. 2.Bond Terms. (a)Original Issue Date; Denominations; Maturities; Term Bond Option. The Bonds shall be dated October 28, 2025, as the date of original issue, be issued forthwith on or after such date in fully registered form, be numbered from R-1 upward in the denomination of $5,000 each or in any integral multiple thereof of a single maturity (the "Authorized Denominations") and mature on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2028 $ 2033 $ 2029 2034 2030 2035 2031 2036 2032 2037 As may be requested by the Purchaser, one or more term Bonds may be issued having mandatory sinking fund redemption and final maturity amounts conforming to the foregoing principal repayment schedule, and corresponding additions may be made to the provisions of the applicable Bond(s). (b)Book Entry Only System. The Depository Trust Company, a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York or any of its successors or its successors to its functions hereunder (the "Depository") will act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to this end: (i)The Bonds shall be initially issued and, so long as they remain in book entry form only (the "Book Entry Only Period"), shall at all times be in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond for each maturity of the Bonds; and for purposes of complying with this requirement under paragraphs 5 and 10 Authorized Denominations for any Bond shall be deemed to be limited during the Book Entry Only Period to the outstanding principal amount of that Bond. (ii)Upon initial issuance, ownership of the Bonds shall be registered in a bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar (as hereinafter defined) in the name of CEDE & CO, as the nominee (it or any nominee of the existing or a successor Depository, the "Nominee"). (iii)With respect to the Bonds neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to any broker, dealer, bank, or any other financial institution for which the Depository holds Bonds as securities depository (the Page 99 of 194 176670284v1 3 "Participant") or the person for which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds shown on the books and records of the Participant (the "Beneficial Owner"). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, neither the City, nor the Bond Registrar, shall have any such responsibility or obligation with respect to (A) the accuracy of the records of the Depository, the Nominee or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, or (B) the delivery to any Participant, any Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (C) the payment to any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds, or (D) the consent given or other action taken by the Depository as the Registered Holder of any Bonds (the "Holder"). For purposes of securing the vote or consent of any Holder under this Resolution, the City may, however, rely upon an omnibus proxy under which the Depository assigns its consenting or voting rights to certain Participants to whose accounts the Bonds are credited on the record date identified in a listing attached to the omnibus proxy. (iv)The City and the Bond Registrar may treat as and deem the Depository to be the absolute owner of the Bonds for the purpose of payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to the Bonds, for the purpose of obtaining any consent or other action to be taken by Holders for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all purpose whatsoever. The Bond Registrar, as paying agent hereunder, shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to the Holder or the Holders of the Bonds as shown on the bond register, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (v)Upon delivery by the Depository to the Bond Registrar of written notice to the effect that the Depository has determined to substitute a new Nominee in place of the existing Nominee, and subject to the transfer provisions in paragraph 10, references to the Nominee hereunder shall refer to such new Nominee. (vi)So long as any Bond is registered in the name of a Nominee, all payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, by the Bond Registrar or City, as the case may be, to the Depository as provided in the Letter of Representations to the Depository required by the Depository as a condition to its acting as book-entry Depository for the Bonds (said Letter of Representations, together with any replacement thereof or amendment or substitute thereto, including any standard procedures or policies referenced therein or applicable thereto respecting the procedures and other matters relating to the Depository's role as book- entry Depository for the Bonds, collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Letter of Representations"). Page 100 of 194 176670284v1 4 (vii)All transfers of beneficial ownership interests in each Bond issued in book-entry form shall be limited in principal amount to Authorized Denominations and shall be effected by procedures by the Depository with the Participants for recording and transferring the ownership of beneficial interests in such Bonds. (viii)In connection with any notice or other communication to be provided to the Holders pursuant to this Resolution by the City or Bond Registrar with respect to any consent or other action to be taken by Holders, the Depository shall consider the date of receipt of notice requesting such consent or other action as the record date for such consent or other action; provided, that the City or the Bond Registrar may establish a special record date for such consent or other action. The City or the Bond Registrar shall, to the extent possible, give the Depository notice of such special record date not less than fifteen calendar days in advance of such special record date to the extent possible. (ix)Any successor Bond Registrar in its written acceptance of its duties under this Resolution and any paying agency/bond registrar agreement, shall agree to take any actions necessary from time to time to comply with the requirements of the Letter of Representations. (c)Termination of Book-Entry Only System. Discontinuance of a particular Depository's services and termination of the book-entry only system may be effected as follows: (i)The Depository may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving written notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. The City may terminate the services of the Depository with respect to the Bond if it determines that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its functions as securities depository or the continuation of the system of book-entry transfers through the Depository is not in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners. (ii)Upon termination of the services of the Depository as provided in the preceding paragraph, and if no substitute securities depository is willing to undertake the functions of the Depository hereunder can be found which, in the opinion of the City, is willing and able to assume such functions upon reasonable or customary terms, or if the City determines that it is in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners of the Bond that the Beneficial Owners be able to obtain certificates for the Bonds, the Bonds shall no longer be registered as being registered in the bond register in the name of the Nominee, but may be registered in whatever name or names the Holder of the Bonds shall designate at that time, in accordance with paragraph 10. To the extent that the Beneficial Owners are designated as the transferee by the Holders, in accordance with paragraph 10, the Bonds will be delivered to the Beneficial Owners. (iii)Nothing in this subparagraph (d) shall limit or restrict the provisions of paragraph 10. Page 101 of 194 176670284v1 5 (d) Letter of Representations. The provisions in the Letter of Representations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of the resolution, and if and to the extent any such provisions are inconsistent with the other provisions of this resolution, the provisions in the Letter of Representations shall control. 3. Purpose. The Bonds shall provide funds to finance the Improvements. The total cost of the Improvements, which shall include all costs enumerated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, is estimated to be at least equal to the amount of the Bonds. Work on the Improvements shall proceed with due diligence to completion. The City covenants that it shall do all things and perform all acts required of it to assure that work on the Improvements proceeds with due diligence to completion and that any and all permits and studies required under law for the Improvements are obtained. 4. Interest. The Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing August 1, 2026, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, at the respective rates per annum set forth opposite the maturity years as follows: Maturity Year Interest Rate Maturity Year Interest Rate 2028 % 2033 % 2029 2034 2030 2035 2031 2036 2032 2037 5. Redemption. All Bonds maturing on February 1, 2035, and thereafter shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City on February 1, 2034, and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the maturities and the principal amounts within each maturity to be redeemed shall be determined by the City and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected registered Holder of the Bonds not more than sixty (60) days and not fewer thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Registrar prior to giving notice of redemption shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers so assigned to the Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of each Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it Page 102 of 194 176670284v1 6 shall be surrendered to the Registrar (with, if the City or Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the City and Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the City shall execute (if necessary) and the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of the Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations, as requested by the Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. 6.Bond Registrar. Bond Trust Services Corporation, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, is appointed to act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (the "Bond Registrar"), and shall do so unless and until a successor Bond Registrar is duly appointed, all pursuant to any contract the City and Bond Registrar shall execute which is consistent herewith. The Bond Registrar shall also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor paying agent is duly appointed. Principal and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the registered holders (or record holders) of the Bonds in the manner set forth in the form of Bond and in paragraph 12. 7.Form of Bond. The Bonds, together with the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication, the form of Assignment and the registration information thereon, shall be in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto. 8.Execution. The Bonds shall be in typewritten form, shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of its Mayor and City Clerk and be sealed with the seal of the City; provided, as permitted by law, both signatures may be photocopied facsimiles and the corporate seal has been omitted. In the event of disability or resignation or other absence of either officer, the Bonds may be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the officer who may act on behalf of the absent or disabled officer. In case either officer whose signature or facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, the signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. 9.Authentication. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless a Certificate of Authentication on the Bond, substantially in the form set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto, shall have been duly executed by an authorized representative of the Bond Registrar. Certificates of Authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same person. The Bond Registrar shall authenticate the signatures of officers of the City on each Bond by execution of the Certificate of Authentication on the Bond and by inserting as the date of registration in the space provided the date on which the Bond is authenticated, except that for purposes of delivering the original Bonds to the Purchaser, the Bond Registrar shall insert as a date of registration the date of original issue of October 28, 2025. The Certificate of Authentication so executed on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. 10.Registration; Transfer; Exchange. The City will cause to be kept at the principal office of the Bond Registrar a bond register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as the Bond Registrar may prescribe, the Bond Registrar shall provide for the registration of Bonds and the registration of transfers of Bonds entitled to be registered or transferred as herein provided. Page 103 of 194 176670284v1 7 Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration (as provided in paragraph 9) of, and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations of a like aggregate principal amount, having the same stated maturity and interest rate, as requested by the transferor; provided, however, that no Bond may be registered in blank or in the name of "bearer" or similar designation. At the option of the Holder, Bonds may be exchanged for Bonds of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations of a like aggregate principal amount and stated maturity, upon surrender of the Bonds to be exchanged at the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Whenever any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration of, and deliver the Bonds which the Holder making the exchange is entitled to receive. All Bonds surrendered upon any exchange or transfer provided for in this resolution shall be promptly canceled by the Bond Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. All Bonds delivered in exchange for or upon transfer of Bonds shall be valid general obligations of the City evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this resolution, as the Bonds surrendered for such exchange or transfer. Every Bond presented or surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the Holder thereof or his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of any Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regulations of the City contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar, including regulations which permit the Bond Registrar to close its transfer books between record dates and payment dates. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute the terms of said agreement. 11.Rights Upon Transfer or Exchange. Each Bond delivered upon transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried by such other Bond. 12.Interest Payment; Record Date. Interest on any Bond shall be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name the Bond is registered (the "Holder") on the registration books of the City maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder thereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder thereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for Page 104 of 194 176670284v1 8 payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the Holders not less than ten days prior to the Special Record Date. 13.Treatment of Registered Owner. The City and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the owner of such Bond for the purpose of receiving payment of principal of and premium, if any, and interest (subject to the payment provisions in paragraph 12) on, such Bond and for all other purposes whatsoever whether or not such Bond shall be overdue, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. 14.Delivery; Application of Proceeds. The Bonds when so prepared and executed shall be delivered by the Finance Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof. 15.Fund and Accounts. There is hereby created a special fund to be designated the "General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Fund" (the "Fund") to be administered and maintained by the Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The Fund shall be maintained in the manner herein specified until all of the Bonds and the interest thereon have been fully paid. There shall be maintained in the Fund the "Construction Account" and "Debt Service Account": (a)Construction Account. To the Construction Account shall be credited the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, plus any special assessments levied with respect to the Improvements and collected prior to completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs thereof. From the Construction Account there shall be paid all costs and expenses of making the Improvements listed in paragraph 16, including the cost of any construction contracts heretofore let and all other costs incurred and to be incurred of the kind authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65; and the moneys in the Construction Account shall be used for no other purpose except as otherwise provided by law; provided that the proceeds of the Bonds may also be used to the extent necessary to pay interest on the Bonds due prior to the anticipated date of commencement of the receipt of the collection of taxes or special assessments herein levied or covenanted to be levied; and provided further that if upon completion of the Improvements there shall remain any unexpended balance in the Construction Account, the balance (other than any special assessments) may be transferred to the Debt Service Account or the fund of any other improvement instituted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and provided further that any special assessments credited to the Construction Account shall only be applied towards payment of the costs of the Improvements upon adoption of a resolution by the City Council determining that the application of the special assessments for such purpose will not cause the City to no longer be in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 1. (b)Debt Service Account. There are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to, and there shall be credited to, the Debt Service Account: (i) all collections of special assessments herein covenanted to be levied with respect to the Improvements and either initially credited to the Construction Account and not already spent a permitted above and required to pay any principal and interest due on the Bonds or collected subsequent to the completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs thereof; (ii) all collections of taxes herein or hereafter levied for the payment of the Bonds; (iii) all funds remaining in the Construction Account after completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs thereof; (iv) all investment earnings on funds held in the Page 105 of 194 176670284v1 9 Debt Service Account; and (v) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the City to the Debt Service Account. The amount of any surplus remaining in the Debt Service Account when the Bonds and interest thereon are paid shall be used consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 4. The Debt Service Account shall be used solely to pay the principal and interest and any premiums for redemption of the Bonds and any other general obligation bonds of the City hereafter issued by the City and made payable from the account as provided by law. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments, except (1) for a reasonable temporary period until such proceeds are needed for the purpose for which the Bonds were issued and (2) in addition to the above in an amount not greater than the lesser of five percent of the proceeds of the Bonds or $100,000. To this effect, any proceeds of the Bonds and any sums from time to time held in the Construction Account or Debt Service Account (or any other City account which will be used to pay principal or interest to become due on the bonds payable therefrom) in excess of amounts which under then applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested without regard to yield shall not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield restrictions imposed by the arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary periods" or "minor portion" made available under the federal arbitrage regulations. Money in the Fund shall not be invested in obligations or deposits issued by, guaranteed by or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause the Bonds to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). 16.Assessments. It is hereby determined that no less than twenty percent (20%) of the cost to the City of each Improvement financed hereunder within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, Subdivision 1(3), shall be paid by special assessments to be levied against every assessable lot, piece and parcel of land benefited by any of the Improvements. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will let all construction contracts not heretofore let within one year after ordering each Improvement financed hereunder unless the resolution ordering the Improvement specifies a different time limit for the letting of construction contracts. The City hereby further covenants and agrees that it will do and perform as soon as they may be done all acts and things necessary for the final and valid levy of such special assessments, and in the event that any such assessment be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land due to any error, defect, or irregularity in any action or proceedings taken or to be taken by the City or the City Council or any of the City officers or employees, either in the making of the assessments or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and the City Council will forthwith do all further acts and take all further proceedings as may be required by law to make the assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The special assessments have heretofore been authorized. Subject to such adjustments as are required by conditions in existence at the time the assessments are levied, it is hereby determined that the assessments shall be payable in equal, consecutive, annual installments, including both principal and interest, with interest at a rate per annum set forth below: Page 106 of 194 176670284v1 10 Improvement Designation Levy Years Collection Years Amount Rate See Attached Schedule in Exhibit C At the time the assessments are in fact levied the City Council shall, based on the then current estimated collections of the assessments, make any adjustments in any ad valorem taxes required to be levied in order to assure that the City continues to be in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 1. 17.Tax Levy; Coverage Test. To provide moneys for payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general property taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: Year of Tax Levy Year of Tax Collection Amount See Attached Schedule in Exhibit C The tax levies are such that if collected in full they, together with estimated collections of special assessments pledged for the payment of the Bonds, will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. 18.General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other funds of the City which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. 19.Defeasance. When all Bonds have been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the registered holders of the Bonds shall, to the extent permitted by law, cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Bond Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full, provided that notice of redemption thereof has been duly given. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a suitable banking institution qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities described in Minnesota Page 107 of 194 176670284v1 11 Statutes, Section 475.67, Subdivision 8, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without regard to sale and/or reinvestment, to pay all amounts to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. 20.Compliance With Reimbursement Bond Regulations. The provisions of this paragraph are intended to establish and provide for the City's compliance with United States Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2 (the "Reimbursement Regulations") applicable to the "reimbursement proceeds" of the Bonds, being those portions thereof which will be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure which the City paid or will have paid prior to the Closing Date (a "Reimbursement Expenditure"). The City hereby certifies and/or covenants as follows: (a)Not later than 60 days after the date of payment of a Reimbursement Expenditure, the City (or person designated to do so on behalf of the City) has made or will have made a written declaration of the City's official intent (a "Declaration") which effectively (i) states the City's reasonable expectation to reimburse itself for the payment of the Reimbursement Expenditure out of the proceeds of a subsequent borrowing; (ii) gives a general and functional description of the property, project or program to which the Declaration relates and for which the Reimbursement Expenditure is paid, or identifies a specific fund or account of the City and the general functional purpose thereof from which the Reimbursement Expenditure was to be paid (collectively the "Program"); and (iii) states the maximum principal amount of debt expected to be issued by the City for the purpose of financing the Program; provided, however, that no such Declaration shall necessarily have been made with respect to: (i) "preliminary expenditures" for the Program, defined in the Reimbursement Regulations to include engineering or architectural, surveying and soil testing expenses and similar prefatory costs, which in the aggregate do not exceed twenty percent of the "issue price" of the Bonds, and (ii) a de minimis amount of Reimbursement Expenditures not in excess of the lesser of $100,000 or five percent of the proceeds of the Bonds. (b)Each Reimbursement Expenditure is a capital expenditure or a cost of issuance of the Bonds or any of the other types of expenditures described in Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. (c)The "reimbursement allocation" described in the Reimbursement Regulations for each Reimbursement Expenditure shall and will be made forthwith following (but not prior to) the issuance of the Bonds, and not later than three years after the later of (i) the date of the payment of the Reimbursement Expenditure, or (ii) the date on which the Program to which the Reimbursement Expenditure relates is first placed in service. (d)Each such reimbursement allocation will be made in a writing that evidences the City's use of Bond proceeds to reimburse the Reimbursement Expenditure and, if made within 30 days after the Bonds are issued, shall be treated as made on the day the Bonds are issued. Provided, however, that the City may take action contrary to any of the foregoing covenants in this paragraph upon receipt of an opinion of its bond counsel for the Bonds stating in effect that such action will not impair the tax-exempt status of the Bonds. Page 108 of 194 176670284v1 12 21.Continuing Disclosure. The City is the sole obligated person with respect to the Bonds. The City hereby agrees, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 (the "Rule"), promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking") hereinafter described to: (a)Provide or cause to be provided to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB") by filing at www.emma.msrb.org in accordance with the Rule, certain annual financial information and operating data in accordance with the Undertaking. The City reserves the right to modify from time to time the terms of the Undertaking as provided therein. (b)Provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB notice of the occurrence of certain events with respect to the Bonds in not more than ten (10) business days after the occurrence of the event, in accordance with the Undertaking. (c)Provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB notice of a failure by the City to provide the annual financial information with respect to the City described in the Undertaking, in not more than ten (10) business days following such occurrence. (d)The City agrees that its covenants pursuant to the Rule set forth in this paragraph and in the Undertaking is intended to be for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds and shall be enforceable on behalf of such Holders; provided that the right to enforce the provisions of these covenants shall be limited to a right to obtain specific enforcement of the City's obligations under the covenants. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City, or any other officer of the City authorized to act in their place (the "Officers") are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City the Undertaking in substantially the form presented to the City Council subject to such modifications thereof or additions thereto as are (i) consistent with the requirements under the Rule, (ii) required by the Purchaser of the Bonds, and (iii) acceptable to the Officers. 22.Certificate of Registration and Tax Levy. A certified copy of this resolution is hereby directed to be filed with the County Auditor/Treasurer of Dakota County, Minnesota, together with such other information as the County Auditor/Treasurer shall require, and there shall be obtained from the County Auditor/Treasurer a certificate that the Bonds have been entered in the County Auditor/Treasurer's Bond Register, and that the tax levy required by law has been made. 23.Records and Certificates. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to bond counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as are required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 24.Negative Covenant as to Use of Bond Proceeds and Improvements. The City hereby covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to use the Improvements, or to cause or permit Page 109 of 194 176670284v1 13 them to be used, or to enter into any deferred payment arrangements for the cost of the Improvements, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 25.Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds; Rebate. The City shall comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income under Section 103 of the Code of the interest on the Bonds, including without limitation (i) requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, (ii) limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and (iii) the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued and outstanding at one time in this calendar year) exceed the small-issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements for governmental units issuing $5,000,000 or less of bonds, the City hereby finds, determines and declares that (i) the Bonds are issued by a governmental unit with general taxing powers; (ii) no Bonds are a private activity bond; (iii) 95% or more of the net proceeds of the Bonds are to be used for local governmental activities of the City (or of a governmental unit the jurisdiction of which is entirely within the jurisdiction of the City); and (iv) the aggregate face amount of all tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all entities subordinate to, or treated as one issuer with the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 26.Designation of Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City hereby makes the following factual statements and representations: (a)the Bonds are issued after August 7, 1986; (b)the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (c)the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (d)the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds, treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all entities treated as one issuer with the City, and all subordinate entities whose obligations are treated as issued by the City) during this calendar year 2025 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (e)not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during this calendar year 2025 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; and (f)the aggregate face amount of the Bonds does not exceed $10,000,000. The City shall use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designation made by this paragraph. Page 110 of 194 176670284v1 14 27.Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Ehlers is hereby approved and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement. 28.Payment of Issuance Expenses. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, San Francisco, California, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by Ehlers. 29.Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. 30.Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____________ and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 111 of 194 176670284v1 15 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A. WITNESS my hand on October 7, 2025. _______________________________________ City Clerk Page 112 of 194 176670284v1 A-1 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS [To be supplied by Ehlers & Associates, Inc.] Page 113 of 194 176670284v1 B-1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF BOND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS R-____ $_________ GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 2025A Interest Rate Maturity Date Date of Original Issue CUSIP ____% February 1, 20___ October 28, 2025 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (the "Issuer"), certifies that it is indebted and for value received promises to pay to the registered owner specified above, or registered assigns, unless called for earlier redemption, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing August 1, 2026, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve thirty-day months) until the principal sum is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond are payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at the Bond Trust Services Corporation, in Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar"), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the Issuer. Interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder") on the registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not less than ten days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. So long as this Bond is registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee as provided in the Resolution hereinafter described, and as those terms are defined therein, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond and notice with respect thereto shall be made as provided in the Letter of Page 114 of 194 176670284v1 B-2 Representations, as defined in the Resolution, and surrender of this Bond shall not be required for payment of the redemption price upon a partial redemption of this Bond. Until termination of the book-entry only system pursuant to the Resolution, Bonds may only be registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee. Optional Redemption. The Bonds of this issue (the "Bonds") maturing on February 1, 2035, and thereafter, are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2034, and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the maturities and the principal amounts within each maturity to be redeemed shall be determined by the Issuer; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected registered Holder of the Bonds not more than sixty (60) days and not fewer thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. Prior to the date on which any Bond or Bonds are directed by the Issuer to be redeemed in advance of maturity, the Issuer will cause notice of the call thereof for redemption identifying the Bonds to be redeemed to be mailed to the Bond Registrar and all Bondholders, at the addresses shown on the Bond Register. All Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest on the specified redemption date, provided funds for their redemption have been duly deposited. Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers assigned to the Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of such Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of the Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations, as requested by the Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Issuance; Purpose; General Obligation. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $2,820,000, all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to number, maturity, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the Issuer on October 7, 2025 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing money to finance the Issuer's Friendly Hills street rehabilitation and water main replacement Page 115 of 194 176670284v1 B-3 project in the jurisdiction of the Issuer. This Bond is payable out of the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Fund of the Issuer. This Bond constitutes a general obligation of the Issuer, and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of its principal, premium, if any, and interest when the same become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the Issuer have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. Denominations; Exchange; Resolution. The Bonds are issuable solely in fully registered form in Authorized Denominations (as defined in the Resolution) and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other Authorized Denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Transfer. This Bond is transferable by the Holder in person or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal office of the Bond Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar. Thereupon the Issuer shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in exchange for this Bond, one or more new fully registered Bonds in the name of the transferee (but not registered in blank or to "bearer" or similar designation), of an Authorized Denomination or Denominations, in aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of this Bond, of the same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate. Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Treatment of Registered Owners. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided (except as otherwise provided herein with respect to the Record Date) and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. This Bond has been designated by the Issuer as a "qualified tax-exempt obligation" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law; that the Issuer has covenanted and agreed with the Holders of the Bonds that it will levy a direct, annual, irrepealable Page 116 of 194 176670284v1 B-4 ad valorem tax upon all of the taxable property of the Issuer, without limitation as to rate or amount, for the years and in amounts sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds as they respectively become due, if any sums irrevocably appropriated to the Debt Service Account are insufficient therefor; and that this Bond, together with all other debts of the Issuer outstanding on the date of original issue hereof and the date of its issuance and delivery to the original purchaser, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, by its City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of its Mayor and its City Clerk, the corporate seal of the Issuer having been intentionally omitted as permitted by law. Date of Registration: BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within. Bond Trust Services Corporation Minneapolis, Minnesota Bond Registrar By: Authorized Signature Registrable by: BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION Payable at: BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA [DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM OF BOND] Mayor [DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM OF BOND] City Clerk Page 117 of 194 176670284v1 B-5 ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA - ___________ as custodian for ______________ (Cust) (Minor) under the _____________________ Uniform (State) Transfers to Minors Act Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________________________________ the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________ attorney to transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:_________________ ____________________________________________ Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: ___________________________ Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges or any other "Eligible Guarantor Institution" as defined in 17 CFR 240.17 Ad-15(a)(2). The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the transferee requested below is provided. Name and Address: ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ (Include information for all joint owners if the Bond is held by joint account.) Page 118 of 194 176670284v1 C-1 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULES [To be supplied by Ehlers & Associates, Inc.] Page 119 of 194 This page is intentionally left blank 9.b REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-64 Approving the Adoption of the City of Mendota Heights Amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Planning Case 2025-02) ITEM TYPE: Resolution DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-64 Adopting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from I-Industrial to B- Business and corresponding changes to Chapter 2: Land Use and Growth of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND: City Staff prepared a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application request to complete both a Text and Map Amendment to the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, modifying the ‘Future Land Use Plan’ and guided land use of 99.23 acres of land. This Amendment was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on March 31, 2025, at which a public hearing was held. The City Council reviewed and approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposal at their April 15, 2025, regular meeting, contingent upon Metropolitan Council approval. The 99.23 acres in the subject area to be changed consist of 26 different parcels, owned by 15 different property owners. All but one parcel (2.22 acres) are developed with existing buildings and uses. In addition to the change in guided land use, there are also changes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically within Chapter 2 – Land Use and Growth, to update zoning district types and titles to be consistent with modifications made during the Zoning Code Update Project, as well as other text updates needed to accurately reflect the effect of the proposed guide plan changes. Some of the text updates to the plan included an employment forecast adjustment based on the revised amount of available acreage for industrial and business land use categories. During the Metropolitan Council's staff review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, it was determined that a revised employment forecast would be needed, different than what was originally submitted by the City of Mendota Heights. Metropolitan Council staff found employment was overprojected in the 2040 planning cycle, and should be re-leveled. Also, Page 120 of 194 Council staff considered more capacity possible than the City had estimated in table 2.5 of the Plan. City staff and Council staff agreed upon a growth of +600 jobs, from 11,998 jobs at the recent peak level in 2022 (per Minnesota DEED) to 12,600 jobs in 2040; and 13,200 jobs in 2050. Both the employment forecast in the City’s 2040 Plan and Met Council’s Imagine 2050 forecast will be revised as follows: The Metropolitan Council reviewed and approved the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment September 24, 2025. The City received a letter from the Metropolitan Council dated October 1, 2025, approving the changes to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The final step to implement the amendment is for the City Council to approve and formally adopt the attached Resolution to place the plan amendment into effect. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify the guided land use of 99.23 acres of land from I-Industrial to B- Business and implement corresponding changes to Chapter 2: Land Use and Growth with the Plan, by adopting the attached Resolution 2025-64. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: n/a ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-64 Adopting an Amendment to the Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan to Change the Guided Land Use of 99.23 Acres From I-Industria 2.Notice of Council Action 3.City of Mendota Heights Business and Industrial Park Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Committee Report 9/24/25 4.2040 Plan - Chapter 2. Land Use & Growth - Redline Text Amendment 10-1-25 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 121 of 194 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-64 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE GUIDED LAND USE OF 99.23 ACRES FROM I-INDUSTRIAL (I) TO B-BUSINESS (B) AND IMPLEMENT CORRESPONDING CHANGES TO CHAPTER 2: LAND USE AND GROWTH OF THE PLAN [PLANNING CASE NO. 2025-02] WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025 the City Council of Mendota Heights adopted Resolution No. 2025-20, an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to modify the guided land use of 99.23 acres from I-Industrial to B-Business and corresponding text changes to Chapter 2: Land Use and Growth of the City’s Plan subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and found that the amendment conforms to the regional system plans for transportation, wastewater, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 and Metropolitan Council policies; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council authorizes the City of Mendota Heights to place the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan into effect; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a meeting on October 7, 2025 to consider said Comprehensive Plan Amendment and found that the application request is reasonable and is not contrary to the public interest; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the proposed amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to modify the guided land use from I-Industrial to B-Business and revise corresponding changes to Chapter 2: Land Use and Growth as presented under Planning Case No. 2025-02 is hereby formally approved and placed into effect. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on this 7th day of October, 2025. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor Page 122 of 194 Mendota Heights Res. 2025-64 Page 2 of 2 ATTEST: ________________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Drafted by: City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Page 123 of 194 Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer October 1, 2025 Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: City of Mendota Heights – Business and Industrial Park Land Use Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Notice of Council Action Metropolitan Council Review File No. 22395-2 Metropolitan Council District No. 15 Dear Sarah Madden: At its meeting on September 24, 2025, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the City’s comprehensive plan amendment, based on the staff report (attached). The amendment re-guides 99.23 acres from I-Industrial to B-Business. The amendment is located north of TH 494 and west of TH 55. The purpose of the amendment is to amend text and the future land use map in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, modifying allowable uses and providing clarity in the Business Future Land Use District. The Council found that the amendment conforms to the regional system plans for transportation, wastewater, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 and Council policies; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. Therefore, the City may place the amendment into effect. Please refer to the advisory comment regarding forecasts that is contained in the Review Record. A copy of the staff report to the Council is attached for your records. The Council will append the amendment, submission form and supplemental information to the City's plan in the Council's files. If you have any questions regarding the review please contact Patrick Boylan, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602- 1438 or via email at patrick.boylan@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance Attachment CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Victor Obisakin, Metropolitan Council District 15 Patrick Boylan, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Mendota Heights\Letters\Mendota Heights 2025 Business and Industrial Park Land Use CPA Notice of Council Action 22395-2.docx Page 124 of 194 1 Metropolitan Council Committee Report Community Development Committee Committee meeting date: September 15, 2025 For the Metropolitan Council: September 24, 2025 Business Item: 2025-230 City of Mendota Heights Business and Industrial Park Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File 22395-2 Proposed action That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record and take the following actions: 1.Authorize the City to place its comprehensive plan amendment into effect. 2.Find that the amendment changes the City’s forecasts as described in Table 1 of the Review Record. Summary of Land Use Advisory Committee discussion/questions The Community Development Committee unanimously recommended approval of the proposed action as part of its consent agenda at its meeting on September 15, 2025. Page 125 of 194 2 Metropolitan Council Business Item Community Development Committee Committee Meeting Date: September 15, 2025 For the Metropolitan Council: September 24, 2025 Business Item: 2025-230 City of Mendota Heights Business and Industrial Park Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File 22395-2 District(s), Member(s): District 15, Victor Obisakin Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. § 473.175) Staff Prepared/Presented: Patrick Boylan, Planning Analyst (651-602-1438) Angela R. Torres, Senior Manager (651-602-1566) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record and take the following actions: 1.Authorize the City to place its comprehensive plan amendment into effect. 2.Find that the amendment changes the City’s forecasts as described in Table 1 of the Review Record. Background The City submitted the Business and Industrial Park comprehensive plan amendment on July 18, 2025. The Council received supplemental forecast material on August 4, 2025. The amendment re- guides 99.23 acres from I-Industrial to B-Business. The amendment is located north of TH 494 and west of TH 55. The subject area was evaluated during an update to the zoning code and the City believes commercial is more appropriate than industrial zoning. The purpose of the amendment is to change future land use guiding to “B-Business” as a more appropriate use than “I-Industrial” and which will ensure future land use and zoning consistency. This is the City’s first amendment to its 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Rationale The proposed amendment conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with Council policies, and is compatible with the plans of other local communities and school districts. Thrive Lens Analysis On February 12, 2025, the Council adopted Imagine 2050, which builds on policy direction in Thrive MSP 2040. Under the Thrive lens, the proposed amendment is reviewed against the land use policies in Thrive MSP 2040. To achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive, the metropolitan development guide defines the Land Use Policy for the region and includes strategies for local governments and the Council to implement. These policies and strategies are interrelated and taken together, serve to achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive. Page 126 of 194 3 Metropolitan Council REVIEW RECORD City of Mendota Heights Business and Industrial Park Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review File No. 22395-2, Business Item No. 2025-230 BACKGROUND The City of Mendota Heights is located in northern Dakota County. It is surrounded by the communities of Mendota, Lilydale, St. Paul, West St. Paul, Sunfish Lake, Inver Grove Heights, Eagan, and Bloomington. The City is also bordered by Fort Snelling to the west. Thrive MSP 2040 (Thrive) designates Mendota Heights with a “Suburban” community designation. The Council forecasts from 2030 to 2050 that the City will grow from 11,800 to 12,900 population and 4,900 to 5,500 households. The Council also forecasts that between 2030 and 2050, the City’s employment will increase from 12,100 to 13,300 jobs. The Metropolitan Council reviewed the City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Joint Business Item No. 2021-150, Review File No. 22395-1) on July 14, 2021. This is the first comprehensive plan amendment since the 2040 Plan was reviewed. The Council adopted Imagine 2050 in February 2025. Consistent with the procedures adopted in Business Item 2025-113, the Council is reviewing this item under both Thrive and Imagine 2050. REQUEST SUMMARY The amendment proposes to re-guide 99.23 acres from I-Industrial to B-Business, on a site located north of TH 494 and west of TH 55. The purpose of the amendment is to amend text and the future land use map in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, modifying allowable uses and providing clarity in the Business Future Land Use District. The subject area was evaluated during an update to the zoning code and the City believes commercial is more appropriate than industrial zoning. The purpose of the amendment is to change future land use guiding to “B-Business” as a more appropriate use than “I-Industrial” and which will ensure future land use and zoning consistency. OVERVIEW Conformance with Regional Systems The amendment conforms to the Regional System Plans for Parks, Transportation (including Aviation), and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these plans. Consistency with Council Policies The amendment is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040, consistent with Imagine 2050 Land Use policies, with the Housing Policy Plan, with water resources management, and is consistent with Council forecasts with the proposed changes. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Jurisdictions The amendment will not have an impact on adjacent communities, school districts, or watershed districts, and is compatible with the plans of those districts. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIONS •The Council acted on the 2040 Plan on July 14, 2021 (Joint Business Item No. 2021-150, Review File No. 22395-1). ISSUES I.Does the amendment conform to the regional system plans? Page 127 of 194 4 Metropolitan Council II.Is the amendment consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 and other Council policies? III.Does the amendment change the City’s forecasts? IV.Is the amendment compatible with the plans of adjacent local governmental units and affected jurisdictions? ISSUES ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Conformance with Regional Systems The amendment conforms to the regional system plan for Regional Parks, Transportation, and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these system plans. Additional review comments are included below. Wastewater Service Reviewer: Roger Janzig, Environmental Services (ES) – Wastewater Planning and Community Programs (roger.janzig@metc.state.mn.us) The proposal conforms with the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for this project location. Consistency with Council Policy The amendment is consistent with Council policies for forecasts, land use, housing, sub -surface sewage treatment systems, and water supply. Additional review comments are detailed below . Forecasts Reviewer: Todd Graham, CD – Research (651-602-1322) The submittal states that an employment forecast adjustment is needed. Mendota Heights has the additional expectation of 597 additional jobs, based on the calculations in table 2.5 of the submittal. Council and City staff have communicated about a revised employment forecast timeseries. Council staff find employment was overprojected in the 2040 planning cycle, and should be re- leveled. Also, Council staff consider more capacity possible than the City has estimated in table 2.5 of the Plan. However, the Council and City can both agree to growth of +600 jobs, from 11,998 jobs at the recent peak level in 2022 (per Minnesota DEED) to 12,600 jobs in 2040; and 13,200 jobs in 2050. Both the employment forecast in the City’s 2040 Plan (table 2.1) and Met Council’s Imagine 2050 forecast will be revised as follows; adjustments are underlined in Table 1 below. Table 1. Metropolitan Council Forecast: Mendota Heights Category Current Published Forecast Census Imagine 2050 Forecast 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 2050 Population 12,000 12,000 12,000 11,744 11,800 12,300 12,900 Households 4,900 5,000 5,110 4,787 4,900 5,200 5,500 Employment 12,600 12,900 13,180 10,544 12,200 12,600 13,200 Advisory Comments The table above will be the revised employment forecast in the City’s 2040 Plan; also the Council will adopt this as the revised Imagine 2050 forecast, simultaneous with action on the amendment. Thrive MSP 2040 and Land Use Reviewer: Patrick Boylan, CD – Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1438) The proposed amendment is consistent with land use policy within Thrive MSP 2040. The City is designated as a “Suburban” community and future land use is consistent with regional policy. The amendment proposes to re-guide land designated as I-Industrial to B-Business. The submittal does not propose any changes to residential land. Page 128 of 194 5 Metropolitan Council The City submitted a text and map amendment to the 2040 Plan, modifying the ‘Future Land Use Plan’ and guided land use of 99.23 acres of land from I (Industrial) to B (Business). The City has idenfied areas for redevelopment, particularly areas that are well-served by transportation options and nearby amenities and that contribute to better proximity between jobs and housing. The purpose of the amendment is to reflect anticipated changes to the zoning of the area. Future land uses are required to be consistent with adopted implementation policy. The subject area was evaluated during a recent zoning code update and City staff found a majority of existing uses are more consistent with commercial than industrial zoning. The purpose of the amendment is to change land use guiding to “B-Business” as a more appropriate guiding than “I-Industrial” for the existing landscape. The site does not affect residential land; however, Thrive policy states that Suburban communities must plan for a minimum of 5 units per acre. The City has guided land and expects residential projects to develop between 5.3 and 7.9 units per acre. The site is 99.2 acres and therefore is required to be reviewed by Community Development Committee as the proposed land use change affects more than 80 acres and cannot be administratively approved. Table 2. Planned Residential Density Mendota Heights 2020 - 2040 Change Density Category Min Max Net Acres Min Units Max Units Low Density Residential 2 2.9 25.2 50 73 Medium Density Residential 3 5.9 8.2 25 48 Mixed Use 21 30 6.4 134 192 TOTALS 39.8 209 313 Overall Density 5.3 7.9 Housing Reviewer: Olivia Boerschinger, CD – Housing (651-602-1327) The amendment is consistent with the Council’s Housing Policy Plan. Neither the existing nor the proposed land uses are residential and therefore do not impact the City’s Land Guided for Affordable Housing (LGAH) nor housing policy consistency. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts The proposed amendment is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Systems Figure 2: Location Map Showing Community Designations Figure 3: Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding Page 129 of 194 6 Metropolitan Council Figure 1. Location Map Showing Regional Systems Page 130 of 194 7 Metropolitan Council Figure 2. Location Map Showing Community Designations Page 131 of 194 8 Metropolitan Council Figure 3. Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding Page 132 of 194 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 2: Land Use & Growth REDLINE OF TEXT BEGINNING PG. 10 Page 133 of 194 This page is intentionally blank. Page 134 of 194 1 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 2 LAND USE & GROWTH Most of the developable land in Mendota Heights is completely developed and the city maintains its low-density and open feeling due to substantial areas of public and private open space, wetlands, lakes, bluff and wooded areas. The developed land use pattern is dominated by strong residential neighborhoods throughout the city; business and industrial developments in the southwest corner of the community; major institutional uses such as cemeteries, schools, and golf courses spread out intermittently; and protected natural areas such as Dodge Nature Center, and the bluffs and ravines along the Mississippi River corridor. The city’s natural resources, open spaces and recreation areas define the character of the community and are reflected in both the Existing Land Use and Future Land Use Plans contained in this chapter. Further details regarding the city’s plans to maintain and enhance these systems can be found in Chapter 4. Parks and Trails; Chapter 7. Natural Resources; and Chapter 9. Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area of this Plan. This chapter focuses on creating a sustainable balance between protecting the community’s high quality natural resource systems while enhancing and supporting the built environment. Residents identified protection of the quiet, secluded feel of Mendota Heights’ mature neighborhoods as a priority, and understand that to maintain its neighborhoods it is important to preserve natural features and the environment. To achieve this vision, overarching community goals and policies such as working to reduce airplane noise and protection of the Critical Area underly much of the land use direction described in this chapter. The Future Land Use Plan presented specifically identifies areas planned to stay the same and areas planned for change. The distinction between these two areas allows for targeted development and redevelopment that is intended to support the long-term sustainability of the community, while protecting existing neighborhoods and high quality natural areas that define the character of Mendota Heights. The subsequent sections of this chapter will first describe the city’s land use context within the region. Since Mendota Heights is within the 7-County Metropolitan Area this Plan must be consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s regional plans. The regional context provides the guidelines, while the city’s specific land use plans provide the roadmap and direction for the future of the community. As such, the majority of this chapter focuses on existing land use patterns, the Future Land Use Plan and areas planned for change within this Planning Period. Page 135 of 194 2 Regional Planning Designation The City of Mendota Heights is located within the Metropolitan Council’s jurisdiction and is required to update its Comprehensive Plan for this Planning Period (2020-2040) to be consistent with the regional plan. The following narrative and policies (in gray italic type) are excerpted and paraphrased from the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 Plan which provides the applicable guidelines to Mendota Heights based on its designation: The regional planning area designation and related policies identify the Metropolitan Council’s expectations for the amount, location, and standards for development. A community’s planning area designation is based on its location, amount of developable land, existing development patterns, planned land uses and availability of infrastructure. The Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 Plan designates Mendota Heights as “suburban.” Suburban communities experienced continued growth and expansion during the 1980s and early 1990s, and typically have automobile-oriented development patterns at significantly lower densities than in previous eras. Community designations are intended to guide regional growth and development for areas that have urban infrastructure in place and the capacity to accommodate development and redevelopment and establish land use expectations including overall densities and development patterns. The Metropolitan Council forecasts that “Suburban” communities will account for 22 percent of the region’s population growth, 27 percent of its household growth, and 43 percent of employment growth over the next three decades. The 2040 Thrive MSP policies for Suburban communities are available on the Metropolitan council website, and include the following: Burnsville Bloomington Eagan Mendota Mendota Heights Minneapolis Inver Grove Heights Lilydale South Saint Paul Sunfish Lake Richfield Saint Paul West Saint Paul Fort Snelling (unorg.) Community Designation ANOKA DAKOTA HENNEPIN RAMSEY SCOTT WASHINGTON CARVER Extent of Main Map 0 1 2 3 4 50.5 Miles City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County Community Designation Urban Center - Core City Urban Center Urban Suburban Suburban Edge Emerging Suburban Edge Rural Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential Agricultural Outside Council planning authority County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Lakes and Major Rivers Map 2-1. Community Designation Map for Mendota Heights Source: Metropolitan Council Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Page 136 of 194 3 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update •Orderly and Efficient Land Use •Plan for new growth at overall average densities of 5 units per acre1 Look for development and redevelopment opportunities that link jobs, housing and transit •Plan local infrastructure to accommodate future growth •Natural Resources Protection •Integrate natural resource conservation and restoration into the comprehensive plan and ordinances •Identify contaminated land for reclamation. •Plan for restoration of natural features and functions •Water Sustainability •Implement BMPs to control and treat stormwater in redevelopment •Housing Affordability and Choice • Support the community’s share of the region’s affordable housing need •Support a mix of housing affordability •Use various sources of funding and financing tools to facilitate the development of lifecycle and affordable housing, including the needs of multi-generational households 1. The Met Council policy applies only to new residential development in the city for this Planning Period and does not affect existing development or neighborhoods. All new single-family, medium density and high density residential development combined is planned to be 5 units/acre or more as shown in subsequent sections of this Plan. Existing residential development across the whole city is approximately 2.3 dwelling units/acre. Metropolitan Council policies for Suburban Communities: https://metrocouncil.org/ Planning/Publications-And- Resources/Thrive-MSP-2040- Plan-(1)/7_ThriveMSP2040_ LandUsePoliciesbyCD.aspx Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan June 2019 Introduction & Background 1-10 •Water Sustainability o Implement BMPs to control and treat stormwater in redevelopment •Housing Affordability and Choice o Support the community’s share of the region’s affordable housing need o Support a mix of housing affordability o Use various sources of funding and financing tools to facilitate the development of lifecycle and affordable housing, including the needs of multigenerational households •Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice o Focus growth, if possible, around regional transit o Support improved pedestrian and bicycle circulation o Consider policies that reduce reliance on single-occupancy vehicles o Adopt Complete Streets policies Lemay Lake Lemay Lake Page 137 of 194 4 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update •Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice •Focus growth, if possible, around regional transit •Support improved pedestrian and bicycle circulation •Consider policies that reduce reliance on single-occupancy vehicles •Adopt Complete Streets policies •Economic Competitiveness •Identify appropriate areas for business and industrial expansion •Support the cleanup and reuse of contaminated land •Preserve the industrial base for higher-intensity employment and new industries •Protect sites for highway-, river-, and rail-dependent manufacturing and freight transportation needs •Plan for land uses that support the growth of businesses that export goods and services outside the region •Preserve locations for employment, manage growth, and minimize land use conflicts •Building Resilience •Identify potential vulnerabilities in local infrastructure as a result of severe weather •Participate in programs that incentivize wind and solar power •Consider a property-assessed clean energy (PACE) program for conservation and renewable energy •Promote community solar gardens •Encourage travel demand management (TDM) policies and ordinance •Consider development standards that increase vegetative cover and increase the solar reflective quality of surfaces. •Participate in urban forestry assistance programs Village at Mendota Heights Centre Pointe Business Park Page 138 of 194 5 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Population, Household & Employment Forecasts In 2015 the Metropolitan Council issued a System Statement to the City of Mendota Heights which provided population, household and employment forecasts for the community for this Planning Period. The past five years has provided greater direction to the city with respect to anticipated growth and as a result requested adjustments to the forecasts initially provided in 2015. The adjusted forecasts for population, household and employment as agreed to by the Metropolitan Council and the City of Mendota Heights are provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1. Population, Household, and Employment Forecasts 2010 – 2040 2010 2018 2020 2030 2040 Population (% change)11,071 11,340 (2.4%) 12,000 (5.8%) 12,000 (0%) 12,000 (0%) Households (% change)4,378 N/A 4,900 (12%) 5,000 (2%) 5,110 (2.2%) Employment (% change)11,550 N/A 12,600 (-9%) 12,900 (142.4%) 13,180 (3 2.2%) Source: Metropolitan Council, US Census, City of Mendota Heights, SHC As demonstrated in Table 2-1, the city is planning for some household growth between 2020 and 2040. Most of the household growth is anticipated to occur in areas designated for mixed- use, which is likely to be primarily multi-family development. As a result of this development pattern, the population is expected to remain generally constant as the number of persons-per- households shrinks. The city’s employment is anticipated to grow over this Planning Period but not quite as significantly as contemplated in the 2015 forecasts. While there remains land capacity to support increased business and light industrial development, the growth trends over the past 5-years indicate a slightly slower rate of employment growth adding approximately 580 jobs over the next 20-years to the community. GOALS & POLICIES The goals and policies set the direction for the community and describe the land use aspirations that the city hopes to achieve for this Planning Period. An important part of this Plan is to communicate to residents, business owners, and stakeholders the vision using a combination of goals, policies and maps. To that end, the goals and policies that follow focus on existing and future land uses and are intended to directly support the Future Land Use Plan contained in subsequent sections of this chapter. 12,60012,20010,544 Page 139 of 194 6 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update GOAL 1: The Future Land Use Plan will provide the foundation for all land use decisions in Mendota Heights. Policies 1.Development and redevelopment of housing, businesses, transportation systems, parks and community facilities shall be done in accordance with this Plan. 2.This Plan shall be reviewed and amended as necessary to ensure development policies are consistent with the city’s vision for current and future development decisions. 3.Any zoning and/or rezoning decisions shall conform to the Future Land Use Plan. 4.The Future Land Use Plan should be periodically updated to reflect changing priorities and conditions of the city, or if needed to conform with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. 5.The city will strive to create a balanced land use pattern that provides appropriate designations that meet projected growth and market demand. GOAL 2: Preserve, protect, and enrich the mature, fully developed residential neighborhoods and character of the community. Policies 1.Subdivision and zoning standards will require high quality site and building design in all new developments. 2.The city will emphasize quality design, innovative solutions, and general focus on aesthetics throughout the community, including within existing developments and buildings. 3.Future parks, trails and open spaces will be planned within walking distance of all residential areas, both existing and planned. 4.Development and planning of land will be encouraged to provide reasonable access to the surrounding communities. 5.Public buildings and properties will be designed, constructed and maintained to be a source of civic pride and to set a standard for private property owners to follow. 6.A mechanism will be developed to allow for the maintenance and reinvestment in identified non-conforming properties. Page 140 of 194 7 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 7.Redevelopment of existing MR-Medium Density Residential and HR-High Density Residential properties are to be limited to densities consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. 8.LR-Low Density Residential development and redevelopment shall avoid creating new “flag lots” if the “flag” has less than 100-feet of frontage. Goal 3: Encourage and support industrial and commercial development in designated areas. Policies 1.The city will use available resources to identify redevelopment needs. This will include cooperation with Dakota County and the Metropolitan Council to achieve redevelopment objectives. 2.Transitions between adjoining land uses will be required for adjacent residential uses, and will be encouraged between compatible land uses (e.g. transition between a general manufacturing and retail use will be encouraged). 3.Amenities within the industrial and commercial districts will be encouraged to promote a more vibrant and attractive place for workers. Goal 4: Work to reduce the impact of aircraft noise throughout the community. Policies 1.Increase public participation and representation on the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) and with the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). 2. Achieve noise reduction through advocating modified takeoff procedures and corridor compliance. 3.Monitor the continued implementation of the Minneapolis/St. Paul (MSP) Airport Comprehensive Plan. 4. Advocate for specific noise control measures through operational changes and advanced technology. 5. Notify and work with Federal Aviation Administration and other appropriate agencies in the event that potential airspace obstructions are encountered. 6.Consider aircraft noise and safety issues in applicable land use and zoning decisions. Page 141 of 194 8 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update EXISTING LAND USE The city’s developable land is nearly fully developed with a mix of low-density single-family uses, pockets of medium and higher density multi-family housing, commercial nodes and light industrial development. The existing development pattern is expected to remain through this Planning Period, with targeted opportunities for development or redevelopment which are described in subsequent sections of this chapter. The following table indicates how the existing land use is distributed within the city which illustrated on Map 2-2. Existing Land Use. These categories are not the same and do not necessarily correspond to the Future Land Use categories identified later in this chapter. Table 2-2. 2017 Existing Land Use 2017 Existing Land Use Gross Acres % Total Net Acres *% Total Rural Residential 147.36 2.29%115.86 1.80% Low Density Residential 1,792.12 27.86%1,727.75 26.86% Medium Density Residential 63.79 0.99%59.80 0.93% Medium Density Residential - PUD 14.17 0.22%14.17 0.22% High Density Residential 127.19 1.98%126.52 1.97% High Density Residential - PUD 6.42 0.10%6.42 0.10% Business 21.78 0.34%21.78 0.34% Limited Business 98.38 1.53%96.71 1.50% Mixed-Use - PUD 38.66 0.60%37.20 0.58% Industrial 386.17 6.00%384.76 5.98% City Facilities 37.79 0.59%31.99 0.50% Schools (Public/Private)288.06 4.48%282.21 4.39% Churches Synagogues 32.59 0.51%30.53 0.47% Cemetery 239.67 3.73%238.47 3.71% Park/Open Space 1,032.68 16.05%526.46 8.18% Golf Course: large/small 292.47 4.55%281.95 4.38% Right-of-Way 1,222.47 19.00%1,202.42 18.69% Open Water 591.03 9.19%551.02 8.57% Wetland 0.00 0%696.80 10.83% Total 6,432.81 100%6,432.81 100% * The net acreage calculations reflect the gross acreage of each land use less wetland areas. Source: Metropolitan Council, City of Mendota Heights, Stantec, SHC Page 142 of 194 9 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA R DHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE Existing Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017 FIGURE 2-2 Park/Open Space Mixed-Use - PUD Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Mixed Use - PUD Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Parks/Open Space Golf Course Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland City Boundary City Boundary Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public/Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Golf Course: Large/Small Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland Map 2-2. Existing Land Use MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVERMINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMARIE AVE W MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RDHUBER DR SI BL EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND DR WENTWORTH AVE WWACHTLER AVEWAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA RDHUNTER LNORCHARD PL VICTORIA RD SIVY FALLS AVE Existing Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017 FIGURE 2-2 Park/Open Space Mixed-Use - PUD Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Mixed Use - PUD Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Parks/Open Space Golf Course Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland City Boundary City Boundary Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Golf Course Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland Created June 2019, Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017 MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE Existing Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017 FIGURE 2-2 Park/Open Space Mixed-Use - PUD Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Mixed Use - PUD Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Parks/Open Space Golf Course Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland City Boundary City Boundary Rural Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential - PUD High Density Residential High Density Residential - PUD Business Limited Business Industrial City Facilities Schools (Public Private) Churches Synagogues Cemetery Golf Course Right-of-Way Open Water Wetland Page 143 of 194 10 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update FUTURE LAND USE The Future Land Use Plan describes the city’s plan for its future land use and development patterns. As previously introduced, Mendota Heights is almost fully developed and the majority of the land use pattern is anticipated to remain the same as it is today. Existing single- family neighborhoods are planned to stay the same, while opportunities for development and redevelopment are concentrated in areas more recently developed such as key transportation nodes and mixed-use areas. This section describes 1) the overall planned future land use pattern of the community; 2) key considerations for areas planned to stay the same, with specific interest on existing neighborhoods; and 3) areas planned for change focusing on areas where new residential and commercial uses may be developed or redeveloped over this Planning Period. Future Land Use Plan The following table summarizes the city’s Future Land Use which is depicted on Map 2-3. Future Land Use Plan (2040): Table 2-3. Future Land Use Acreage by Decade 2040 Future Land Use Density Range (DU/Ac) 2020 Acres % of Total 2030 Acres % of Total 2040 Acres % of Total RR - Rural Residential 0.1-1.45 322.68 5.02%308.88 4.80%218.88 3.40% LR - Low Density Residential 2.0 - 2.9 1,680.4 26.12%1,691.10 26.29%1,781.10 27.69% MR - Medium Density Residential 3.0 - 5.9 187.64 2.92%187.64 2.92%187.64 2.92% HR - High Density Residential 6.0 - 9.0 65.57 1.02%65.57 1.02%65.57 1.02% LB - Limited Business N/A 143.86 2.24%143.86 2.24%143.86 2.24% B - Business N/A 16.07 0.25%30.87 0.48%30.87 130.1 0.48% 2.02% MU - Mixed-Use 21.0 - 30.0 47.41 0.74%47.41 0.74%47.41 0.74% I - Industrial N/A 388.8 6.04%401 6.23%401 301.77 6.23% 4.69% P/S - Public/Semi-Public N/A 539.41 8.39%515.51 8.01%515.51 8.01% P - Park/Open Space N/A 1,227.47 19.08%1,227.47 19.08%1,227.47 19.08% Right-of-Way N/A 1,222.47 19.00%1,222.47 19.00%1,222.47 19.00% Open Water N/A 591.03 9.19%591.03 9.19%591.03 9.19% Total 6,432.81 100%6,432.81 100%6,432.81 100% Page 144 of 194 11 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE 2040 Planned Future Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2017 FIGURE 2-5 LandUse 2040Plan LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public P - Park & Open Space Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) P - Park/Open Space Map 2-3. Future Land Use Plan (2040) MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVERMINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMARIE AVE W MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RDHUBER DR SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND DR WENTWORTH AVE WWACHTLER AVEWAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA RDHUNTER LNORCHARD PL VICTORIA RD SIVY FALLS AVE 2040 Planned Future Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2017 FIGURE 2-5 LandUse 2040Plan LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public P - Park & Open Space Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) P - Park/Open Space Created June 2019, Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2017 MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE 2040 Planned Future Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet June 2019 Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2017 FIGURE 2-5 LandUse 2040Plan LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public P - Park & Open Space Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) P - Park/Open Space Page 145 of 194 12 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Land Use Designations The following definitions are provided to describe the Future Land Use designations identified on Table 2-3. Future Land Use Acreage by Decade. Residential Uses The city’s land uses are predominantly developed with low density single-family uses, with small pockets of multi-family housing located at key transportation corridors and nodes. The trend towards a more balanced housing pattern is recent with eight percent (8%) of the residentially- designated land in the city utilized for multiple family homes or medium to high-density development, which marks a significant increase from one percent (1%) in 1979 and five percent (5%) in 2002. The Future Land Use Plan identifies five categories with residential uses: rural, low density, medium density, high density and mixed-use. •RR – Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Acre) This land use is generally located in the east central part of the city. This designation is intended for large lot single-family residences and includes properties with and without city sewer. The Rural Residential areas are planned with a density not to exceed 1.45 units per acre. The corresponding zoning district classification is R-1A (One Family Residential). •LR – Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Acre) This land use is the most prevalent land use category in the city and generally allows development of single-family principal and accessory uses. This designation corresponds to the R-1 zoning district, which requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 100 feet. •MR – Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Acre) This land use generally allows townhome and attached housing development at suburban densities. New areas of Medium Density Residential are added in this update to include existing townhouse and duplex projects that were previously designated Low Density and zoned R-1, but are actually developed consistent with this land use designation. The corresponding zoning district classifications are: R-2 (Medium Density Residential District) and MR-PUD (Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development). Page 146 of 194 13 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update •HR – High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Acre) This land use provides for multi-family and apartment development at suburban densities. Most of this land use is in a few large apartment projects. The corresponding zoning district classifications are: R-3 (High Density Residential District) and HR-PUD (High Density Residential Planned Unit Development). City Code includes Planned Unit Developments (PUD) regulations that allow for a varied and compatible development of property by encouraging reasonable flexibility from applicable standards, including higher densities than would be allowed under the underlying zoning district and/or future land use designation. Mendota Heights has approved three (3) high-density residential PUD’s in the community. •MU – Mixed-Use (21.0 - 30.0 DU/Acre for Residential Uses) Undeveloped land guided mixed-use is planned to develop approximately 75% of its acres with residential uses at the densities identified, which is consistent with existing mixed-use projects in the city. The northeast quadrant of the Highway 62 and Dodd Road intersection has been developed into a mixed-use center known as The Village at Mendota Heights. The southeast corner of this includes the Mendota Plaza shopping center which has seen renovation and redevelopment in recent years, including a new Walgreen’s pharmacy; White Pine Senior Living, a 50-unit assisted living complex, and a 4-story 139-unit apartment project developed by At Home Apartments. The current residential development has developed at densities between 21 and 30 dwelling units per acre, and adjacent undeveloped outlots are guided to develop at similar densities. Commercial Uses Commercial land uses are typically divided into three general categories; (1) office, (2) retail, and (3) mixed-use. The office category includes land uses generally considered to be of a limited business nature, typically a daytime office use. Map 2-3. Future Land Use Plan identifies these areas as “LB - Limited Business”. The current and corresponding zoning district classifications are is B-1 (Limited Business), B-1A (Business Park) and B-2 (Neighborhood Business). Retail and mixed-use are similar, but the mixed-use designation includes compatible residential uses in proximity. Page 147 of 194 14 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update •LB – Limited Business There are presently four locations where most Limited Business uses in Mendota Heights are currently located or planned: -In the southwest quadrant of Highway 62 and Lexington Avenue; -Either side of Mendota Heights Road, between I-35E and Dodd Road; -On the south side of South Plaza Drive, east of Dodd Road near the Mendota Plaza area; and -On the south side of Highway 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway) at the northern city boundary, east of I-35E. The second category of commercial uses expands the uses to include retail, restaurants, hotels and other commercial uses. This includes neighborhood type convenience stores and shopping centers. Map 2-3. Future Land Use Plan identifies these areas as “B - Business” and “MU - Mixed-Use”. The current and corresponding zoning district classifications are B-1 3 (General Business), B-4 (Shopping Center) and PUD - Planned Unit Development. • B – Business There are four locations where Business uses are planned: -The southeast quadrant of Highway 62 and Lexington Avenue; -The northeast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Mendota Heights Road; -The area between Highway 55 to the west, Mendota Heights Road to the north, and Northland Drive to the east/south. -The area between Highway 55 to the east, Mendota Heights Road to the north, Pilot Knob Road to the west, and Interstate 494 to the south. -The 14.6 acres assemblage of city-owned parcels, located east of Highway 55, north of Bourne Lane and south of Lemay Shore Drive. The properties are commonly referred to as the “Bourne Lane Site”. Similar to the Business land use designation, the Mixed-Use designation allows for neighborhood types of retail, shops, and includes service businesses such as restaurants, salons, professional services, etc., that are compatible with residential uses. •MU – Mixed-Use The city’s largest concentration of commercial or business uses are located at Highway 62 and Dodd Road, in the Mendota Plaza and The Village at Mendota Heights developments which are both guided mixed-use. Page 148 of 194 15 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update The northeast quadrant of this intersection has been developed into a mixed-use center known as The Village at Mendota Heights. The southeast corner of this includes the Mendota Plaza shopping center which has seen renovation and redevelopment in recent years, including a new Walgreen’s pharmacy. The intent of the district is to allow for mixed-use developments that combine residential, retail, and commercial uses into a coordinated, planned development project. This land use designation is located both north and south of the Highway 62 and Dodd Road intersection, the city’s only significant retail area. These two commercial/residential developments are zoned as MU-PUD Mixed-Use-Planned Unit Development. Industrial Uses • I – Industrial The Industrial land use category is concentrated in the city’s industrial and business park in the southwest part of the city, north of I-494. The vast majority of the 400-plus acres of Industrial land is west of Highway 55,north of Mendota Heights Road, and west of Pilot Knob Road with a portion east of Highway 55 and west of I-35E. This land use includes manufacturing, office, and warehousing uses, but also hotels, and other commercial uses. Public and Open Space Uses •P/S – Public/Semi-Public The Public/Semi-Public land use designation includes various land uses that are generally outside the commercial, industrial and residential categories. Among these are city buildings, such as City Hall, public works and fire stations; schools, both public and private; churches and synagogues; and cemeteries. •P – Park/Open Space The Park/Open Space land use designation includes city, State and regional parks, golf courses and nature preserves. Page 149 of 194 16 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Areas Planned to Stay the Same As a mostly developed community, Mendota Heights expects the existing land use pattern to continue through this Planning Period with a few exceptions that are discussed in the next section of this chapter. While the city expects existing neighborhoods and commercial nodes to remain, it is important to plan how the city will maintain and preserve existing uses to ensure a high quality of life for all of the community’s residents and businesses. Guiding Properties Accurately To address and protect the city’s single-family uses, and to accurately identify pockets of non- conformity the Future Land Use Plan must reflect accurately the existing and planned uses in the city. A major effort of this planning process was to review the 2030 Plan and to update the Future Land Use Plan so as to reflect either 1) the actual use or development of the property; or 2) to guide the property consistent with the city’s vision for the future. A list of more than 20 properties of various sizes were identified as guided incorrectly since the last Plan update, and all of the identified properties have been appropriately re-guided as part of this planning process (See Appendix F for full list and map location of properties). The process to update the Future Land Use Plan provides the foundation from which the city can determine what areas should stay the same, and what areas provide opportunities for change. Non-Conforming Single-Family Uses Through this planning process the city identified the most significant existing land use pattern issue is that of non-conforming single-family uses. As described throughout this Plan, the city’s dominant single-family land use has resulted in a low density residential development pattern. While the single-family use is broadly consistent across the city, the individual neighborhood patterns vary based on the decade in which the neighborhood was developed. Design and architecture trends change over time and the neighborhoods reflect the market demand of each particular decade resulting in varying housing styles, lot sizes, and configurations. Fast forward to today, and the city is filled with single-family neighborhoods of different character depending on the decade in which it was developed, yet the city applies a uniform zoning and land use standard that results in non-conforming lots and uses all over the city. The city recognizes there are certain areas of the city where single-family lots are generally smaller (mostly platted pre-1985) and have less than the minimum lot size standard of 15,000 square feet per Zoning Code. Many of these lots and structures do not meet current setback standards that result in a property being deemed non-conforming. To fully understand this issue, a mapping analysis was completed as part of this Plan and is shown on Map 2-4. Lot Sizes for 2020 Single- Family Uses. Page 150 of 194 17 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Over time the city has updated its zoning ordinance affecting lot sizes, setbacks and other dimensional standards. These changes have resulted in single-family parcels becoming legally non-conforming which can pose problems and legal hurdles when homeowners want to improve or expand their dwellings, and in some cases run into setback or lot coverage issues. The city has identified protection and enhancement of existing single-family neighborhoods as a priority in this Planning Period and it is important for property owners to be able to improve and maintain their properties. As a result, the city supports updating the Zoning Ordinance, as part of the Implementation Plan, to provide mechanisms for assisting these legal non-conforming uses, which may permit said uses to be improved or updated without extraordinary measures, such as a variance. Created June 2019, Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2016 Map 2-4. 2020 Single-Family Land Use Lot Size Page 151 of 194 18 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Areas Planned for Change While the majority of the city is planned to stay much the same as it is today, there are opportunities in the community where new development or redevelopment may occur during and in this Planning Period. The city has identified 22 focus areas, each with different characteristics land use designations and planned future land uses. The city acknowledges that development or redevelopment of these properties may be dependent on market conditions and has made its best estimate as to the timing of development activities. The tables that follow summarize the information contained in the narrative for each property identified in the section titled Focus Areas. Table 2-4 estimates the anticipated residential development or redevelopment of the Focus Areas by decade. As shown, the city anticipates that approximately 210 new households will be developed over the next 20-years, consistent with the revised forecasts shown in Table 2-4 of this chapter. Table 2-5 shows the estimated employment projections for development or redevelopment within the Focus Areas, as well as expansion opportunities of existing businesses. Map 2-5 identifies all Focus Areas overlaid with the Future Land Use Plan. Development and redevelopment opportunities comprise diverse land use designations allowing for a variety of potential land uses to be developed in this Planning Period. There is no “staging” plan because infrastructure and utilities are generally available throughout the city. Any site development or redevelopment will likely need site specific improvements, but utilities will either already be on-site or adjacent to the site. As such development or redevelopment could occur anywhere within the city and still be contiguous to infrastructure. The city does believe that the mixed-use areas are most likely to develop within the 2021-2030 time period given current market demand and proximity to existing mixed-use development in the city. This is indicated by the anticipated household development shown in Table 2-4. Page 152 of 194 19 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Table 2-4. Anticipated Residential Development or Redevelopment by Decade Land Use Total Net Developable Acres (Residential)* 2020 2021-2030 2031-2040 Total by 2040 Net Acres HH Net Acres HH Net Acres HH HH (Min)HH (Max) LR (Low Density Residential) 2.0-2.9 DU/Ac 25.2 --15.0 30 10.2 21 50 73 MR (Medium Density Residential) 3.0-5.9 DU/Ac 8.2 --4.1 12 4.1 12 25 48 Mixed-Use** 21.0-30.0 DU/Ac 6.4 --6.4 135 --135 192 Total 41.99 --25.5 177 14.3 33 210 313 Net Density Estimate of Areas Planned for Change 5.0 DU/ Acre 7.5 DU/ Acre * “Total Net Developable Acres” excludes wetlands, arterial right-of-way, park, and 10% parks dedication. ** Mixed-use Residential Acres calculated as 75% of Total Net Developable Acres. Table 2-5. Employment Projections (New Development or Redevelopment) Land Use Planned Acres F.A.R.SF Yield SF/Job 2040 Employment Business 14.8 17.02 35%225,641 322,227 3,000 75.21 107.41Limited Business 36.14 35%550,990 4,500 122.44 Industrial 18.46 16.24 25%201,029 104,443 6,000 33.50 17.41Mixed-Use*9.46 25%103,019 3,000 34.34 Subtotal New Development or Redevelopment 265.50 281.6 Business 4.0 35%61,098 3,000 20.37 Limited Business 26.49 35%403,828 4,500 89.74 Industrial 95.47 25%1,039,641 6,000 173.27 Mixed-Use*35.59 25%96,894 3,000 65.60 Subtotal Expansion Opportunity for Existing Development 315.68 Total Projected 2040 Employment 581 597 * Mixed-use Commercial Acres calculated as 25% of planned acres. Page 153 of 194 20 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Focus Areas In the city’s previous comprehensive plans, a number of specific properties in the city were mapped that were either vacant, under-developed, under-utilized or identified as either potential infill or redevelopment areas. Infill means that the property has the opportunity to develop or redevelop beyond its current level. The city is not recommending any land use or rezoning changes on these sites at this time or as part of this Plan. A summary of these sites are provided below, along with Map 2-5. Focus Areas with Future Land Use Overlay. 1.SE Quadrant of Highway 55 and Acacia Boulevard: This 9.1- acre city-owned site is bounded by Pilot Knob Road on the west, Acacia Boulevard on the north, and Highway 55 on the east. The site was approved under an interim use permit in 2015 as an off-leash dog park for a five year period, but is located in the industrial park and guided for future I - Industrial use. 2.2359 Pilot Knob Road: This area consists of a 3.1-acre property currently used as a single-family residence plus a 0.4-acre site owned by the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Both are guided for I - Industrial use. 3.NW Quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Mendota Heights Road: This vacant 5-acre site is bounded by Highway 13 on the west, and an unnamed extension of Perron Road right-of-way to the north. The property is owned and adjacent to Lloyd’s BBQ business to the south. Site is guided for I - Industrial use. This property is being developed. 4.Highway 55 and Northland Drive: This 2.2- acre site is vacant and guided B-Business I - Industrial. 5.Bourne Lane Site (city-owned properties): This 14.8-acre area on Bourne Lane and Lemay Lake Road consists of nine separate parcels, all owned by the city. The site is guided for B - Business use. 6.1179 Centre Pointe Circle: This 3.6-acre site is one of two vacant parcels in the Centre Pointe Business Park. The site is guided for LB - Limited Business. 7.Centre Pointe Curve and Lexington Avenue: This 2.1-acre site is currently vacant and located on the south frontage road to Highway 62. The site is guided LB - Limited Business. Page 154 of 194 21 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 8.Victoria Curve and Glenhill Road: This 6.3-acre site is vacant and guided LR - Low Density Residential. This property is in the MRCCA Overlay district. 9.Lexington Avenue and Highway 13: Three single-family parcels totaling 3.1 acres are surrounded on three sides by multi-family development. The site is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 10.2015 and 2021 Victoria Road South: Two large single-family parcels totaling 3.5 acres on the north frontage road to Highway 62. The site is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 11.1026, 1032, and 1036 Dakota Trail: Three single-family parcels totaling 2.5 acres on Dakota Trail, the south frontage road to Highway 62, are adjacent to commercial parcels and are guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 12.Lexington Avenue and Wagon Wheel Trail: Bounded by Lexington, Wagon Wheel Trail and I-35E, and adjacent to the Lexington Heights Apartments. The site is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 13.SE Quadrant of I-35E interchange and Mendota Heights Road: This 2.4-acre vacant parcel is guided for LB - Limited Business use. 14.Vacant Parcel – South of Visitation School: The Sisters of the Visitation Monastery own this 28.1-acre vacant parcel on Mendota Heights Road and I-494 just west of Dodd Road. It is one of the largest vacant parcels in the city and is guided as P/S - Public/Semi-Public use. 15.750 Mohican Lane: This property consists of three parcels (two vacant/one developed) containing 7.34 acres of total land area in the Friendly Hills neighborhood. Both are located behind residences on Mohican Lane and Pagel Road. The property is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 16.2455 Delaware Avenue: This is a 2.5 acre, single-family parcel, and is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 17.Dakota County CDA: This area consists of two separate parcels totaling 11.9 acres owned by Dakota County, part of Page 155 of 194 22 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update former reserved highway right-of-way that was never used. The property is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use. 18.Mendota Plaza Area: There are three (3) vacant parcels in and around the Mendota Plaza: (i) a 2.05 acre parcel located northwest of the new The Reserve of Mendota Village apartments; (ii) a 2.1- acre parcel on South Plaza Drive and South Plaza Way; (iii) a 2-acre parcel at the end of South Plaza Drive, owned by Dakota County CDA. All three parcels are guided and zoned MU - Mixed-Use. 19.Village Lots (city-owned properties): These city-owned properties consists of four vacant parcels totaling 1.7 acres, which are located in The Village Center development on the east side of Dodd Road (Hwy 149) and north of Maple Street. The city has been actively marketing the property as a site for high-density residential or mixed-use development. The city recently sold this property. 20.Wachtler and Wentworth: This 2.7-acre residential property in the NE quadrant of Wachtler and Wentworth Avenues adjacent to Wentworth Park is guided for LR - Low Density Residential use (under development). 21.Somerset Area: This area has been referred to as the “Superblock” due to its collection of large residential lots. It consists of over 20 separate parcels on approximately 90 acres located directly south of Somerset Country Club and Golf Course. The area is developed with single-family homes on large lots with private septic systems. The neighborhood is bounded on the east by Delaware Avenue, the north by Wentworth Avenue, and the south and west by smaller single-family lots. The neighborhood contains significant wetlands and woodlands. The area is guided RR - Rural Residential use. Due to the existing large lot configuration, the area has the potential to be further subdivided, provided public sewer, water and road systems would be extended to the area. 22.1170 Dodd Road: This property consists of approximately 3.7 total acres. The property is guided LR - Low Density Residential use. Page 156 of 194 23 Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Map 2-5. Focus Areas with Future Land Use Overlay MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BL EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA R DHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE 2040 Planned Future Land Use Map City of Mendota Heights µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet Legend 2040 Future Land Use RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Open Water LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public P - Park/Open Space FocusAreas Dakota County CDALands Infill Somerset "Super-Block"Area Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water P - Park/Open Space Focus Areas RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Dakota County CDA Lands Infill Somerset "Super-Block" Area MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVERMINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RD1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 9 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 21 20 22 10 11 17 DODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMARIE AVE W MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RDHUBER DR SI BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND DR WENTWORTH AVE WWACHTLER AVEWAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA RDHUNTER LNORCHARD PL VICTORIA RD SIVY FALLS AVE Focus Areas Map µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet Infill Sites and/or Redevelopment Areas City of Mendota Heights Source: Dakota County, 2016 City of Mendota Heights, 2018 June 2019 FIGURE 2-7 Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water P - Park/Open Space FocusAreas RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Dakota County CDA Lands Infill Somerset "Super-Block" Area Created June 2019, Source: City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, 2017 MENDOTA LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESO T A RI V E R ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA LA K E L EMA Y GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RD 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 9 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 21 20 22 10 11 17 DODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MARIE A V E W MENDOTA H E I G H T S R DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD HUBER D R SI BL EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND D R WENTWORTH A V E WWACHTLER AVE WAGON W H E E L T R L MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN ORCHARD P L VICTORIA RD S IVY FALLS AVE Focus Areas Map µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet Infill Sites and/or Redevelopment Areas City of Mendota Heights Source: Dakota County, 2016 City of Mendota Heights, 2018 June 2019 FIGURE 2-7 Legend 2040 Future Land Use LB - Limited Business B - Business I - Industrial P/S - Public/Semi-Public Open Water P - Park/Open Space FocusAreas RR - Rural Residential (0.1 - 1.45 DU/Ac) LR - Low Density Residential (2.0 - 2.9 DU/Ac) MR - Medium Density Residential (3.0 - 5.9 DU/Ac) HR - High Density Residential (6.0 - 9.0 DU/Ac) MU - Mixed-Use (Res. 21.0 - 30.0 DU/Ac) Dakota County CDALands Infill Somerset "Super-Block"Area Page 157 of 194 9.c REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-65 Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 1867 Hunter Lane (Planning Case 2025-17) ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-65 Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for M&M Home Contractors to allow for a residential building height of 21-ft 11.75-in at 1867 Hunter Lane. BACKGROUND: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners’ Representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 21-ft 11.75-in for the construction of a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. The subject property is located on the west side of Hunter Lane and generally southeast of Sibley Memorial Highway and adjacent wooded vacant lots. The existing lot is vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home which was demolished in 2023. The proposed project is to construct a new 8,907 sq-ft home on the property. While the R-1 district permits a maximum building height of 25-ft, infill development is subject to additional height restrictions per Section 12-4A-7 of the zoning ordinance, which limits residential building height to the calculated average height of the principal structures on adjacent lots. The calculated average height for this property is approximately 19 feet (based on an estimated 13-ft height of the structure to the north and 25-ft height of the structure to the south). The applicant is proposing a height of 21 feet, 11.75 inches, requiring a CUP to exceed the calculated average height. At the September 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, a planning report was presented. A duly noticed public hearing was held, and three persons spoke in support of the application. The applicant was present and available to answer questions of the Commission. A copy of the 09/25/2025 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the unapproved minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff Page 158 of 194 recommended approval of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning Commission affirmed the staff recommendation and voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend to the City Council approval of this CUP with findings-of-fact and certain conditions, as outlined in the attached [draft] Resolution. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-65 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Residential Building Height at the Property Located at 1867 Hunter Lane 2.Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes 9-25-25 3.Planning Commission Staff Report 9-25-25 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy Page 159 of 194 Resolution No. 2025-65 Page | 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-65 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1867 HUNTER LANE PLANNING CASE 2025-17 WHEREAS, M&M Home Contractors, (the “Applicant and Owners’ representative”) made an Application for a Conditional Use Permit for residential building height at the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and legally described in Exhibit A (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided LDR-Low Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, and is situated in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Title 12-4A-7: Structure Height Standards, a Conditional Use Permit is required for new single-family home infill development which exceeds the calculated average height of adjacent structures, and the proposed 21-ft 11.75-in height requires these approvals; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit request, whereby planning reports were presented and received by the Commission, and comments from the applicant and public were allowed, and whereupon closing the hearing, the Commission recommended unanimously (5-0 vote) to approve the request from M&M Home Contractors for the Conditional Use Permit, which would allow the proposed height for a new single-family home at 1867 Hunter Lane, as proposed and presented under Planning Case No. 2025-17, with certain conditions and findings-of-fact to support said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the recommendation from the Planning Commission on Planning Case No. 2025-17 is hereby affirmed, and may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact: 1.The proposed construction of a new single family home is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for property within the R-1 Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 160 of 194 Resolution No. 2025-65 Page | 2 3.The construction of the home as shown in the provided plans represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the Conditional Use Permit requested for the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane is hereby approved, with the following conditions: 1.A building permit must be approved and issued by the City prior to the commencement of any work. All applicable zoning, building, and MRCCA requirements shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 2.The building height shall not exceed 21 feet, 11.75 inches, as measured per definition of Building Height in City Code. 3.The building shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and dated 9/5/2025. 4.Street-facing ornamental roof elements exceeding a 9:12 pitch shall be permitted as subordinate features, provided they do not contribute to the overall building height measurement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of October 2025. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 161 of 194 Resolution No. 2025-65 Page | 3 EXHIBIT A Address: 1867 Hunter Lane PIN: 27-18200-00-040 Legal Description: Real property in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows: The North 90 feet of Lot 4 in Colliton Place, except: Commencing on the South line of the tract above described at a point 316 feet West of the Easterly line thereof which is the point of beginning of the description of the tract to be excepted from the above conveyance; thence running Westerly along said South line of said tract to the Westerly line of said Lot 4; thence running Northerly along the Westerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 26.55 feet to a point; thence running in a Southeasterly direction to the point of beginning, Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Page 162 of 194 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES EXCERPT FROM DRAFT/UNAPPROVED 9/25/25 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES A) PLANNING CASE 2025-17 M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1867 HUNTER LANE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the applicant and owner's representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 22 feet, 11.75 inches for the construction of a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Two additional comments were received this afternoon and provided to the Commission at tonight’s meeting, along with a printed copy for meeting attendees. Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Mike Fritz, M&M Home Contractors, commented that he was present to address any questions of the Commission. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, commented that he lives to the north of this property and has lived there for 41 years. He stated that he is very happy that this empty lot will be developed for families. He stated that Mr. Fritz approached him to ask his opinion on the development, and he appreciated that. He supported the request. John Cosgriff, 1875 Hunter Lane, stated that he and his wife live south of the development and are also supportive. He asked that the Commission revisit the new rule related to evening of heights based on surrounding residences, as he believes that the rule creates harm to residents. He stated that this will diminish the number of builds, lower property values, and result in existing residents paying higher taxes. He believed that the policy could be improved and asked that the Commission consider that as a future adjustment. Matt Collins, 543 Abby Way, commented that he is an attorney for M&M Home Contractors and referenced the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, one of which is to improve the housing stock. He also commented on the intent and purpose of the zoning related to orderly development. He believed that the request met the criteria for the Conditional Use Permit. He noted that the previous home on this lot was a 1960s rambler and spoke of how the proposed new home would be an improvement for the property. He stated that both Page 163 of 194 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES neighbors support the request. He asked that the Commission not table this request, as the project had already been tabled at a previous meeting, and commented on the hardship that has been placed on the buyer for the property. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) BY M&M HOME CONTRACTORS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1867 HUNTER LANE, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED AND ISSUED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. ALL APPLICABLE ZONING, BUILDING, AND MRCCA REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 2.THE BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 21 FEET, 1175 INCHES, AS MEASURED PER DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT IN CITY CODE. 3.THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED AND DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2025. 4.STREET-FACING ORNAMENTAL ROOF ELEMENTS EXCEEDING A 9:12 PITCH SHALL BE PERMITTED AS SUBORDINATE FEATURES, PROVIDED THEY DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT MEASUREMENT. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 7, 2025, meeting. Page 164 of 194 Planning Commission Meeting Date: September 25, 2025 Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-17 Conditional Use Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for residential building height for a new single-family home at 1867 Hunter Lane Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners’ Representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for a residential building height of 22-ft 11.75-in for the construction of a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice letters were mailed to all surrounding properties within 350-feet of the subject property. No public comments were received as of the submittal of this report. Background: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a new single-family home to exceed the calculated average building height required for infill development in the R-1 Low Density Residential zoning district. The subject property is located on the west side of Hunter Lane and generally southeast of Sibley Memorial Highway and adjacent wooded vacant lots. The subject property is part of the Colliton Place subdivision, originally platted in 1946. The existing lot is vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home which was demolished in 2023. The proposed project is to construct a new 8,907 sq-ft home on the property. The home is proposed to be located in the general center of the lot, which is consistent with neighboring existing homes and the prior constructed home. While the R-1 district permits a maximum building height of 25 feet, infill development is subject to additional height restrictions per Section 12-4A-7 (listed below), which limits building height to the average height of the principal structures on the immediately adjacent lots. The calculated average height for this property is approximately 19 feet (based on an estimated 13 feet to the north and 25 feet to the south). The applicant is proposing a height of 21 feet, 11.75 inches, requiring a CUP to exceed the calculated average height. "12-4A-7: STRUCTURE HEIGHT STANDARDS: C. Height Standards for Infill Development in R-1 Zoning District. The following height standards are established for any infill lot in the R-1 Zoning District: 1. The permitted maximum height shall be determined by taking the average of the Page 165 of 194 two adjacent principal residential structures, but in no case shall the maximum be set lower than 15-feet. 2. To exceed the maximum height established in C.1, a Conditional Use Permit must be obtained. In no case shall the permitted height exceed 25-feet unless a Variance is also obtained." The applicant has revised the roof design to comply with the maximum 9:12 primary roof pitch now required by City Code. The primary roof structure, as illustrated on the provided plans A4: Right Elevation, contains roof pitches of 9:12 and 4:12. Ornamental roof elements exceeding a 9:12 pitch are located on the street-facing facade, with a 12:14 roof over the garage doors. This roof structure is secondary within the design, and the peak of this roof feature does not exceed the height of the primary roof structure at 9:12 pitch. There are also additional ornamental roof features over dormers with a 12:14 pitch. These features are subordinate to the primary roof and are consistent with previous staff interpretations allowing such architectural elements when they do not affect the height calculation of the primary structure. The City will be considering clarifying language to maximum roof pitch in the future to make it clear to applicants that the intent of the maximum roof pitch standard is to regulate overall residential structure height. Analysis: Pursuant to Title 12-5B-5, the city recognizes that the development and execution of Zoning Code is based upon the division of the city into districts within which regulations are specified. It is further recognized that there are special or conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public need for the particular location. To provide for these needs, the city may approve a conditional use for those uses and purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to ensure that the purpose and intent of this chapter is effectively carried out. The City may grant a conditional use provided the proposed use demonstrates the following: a.Use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, b.Use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, c.Use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value, and d.Use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. A-C) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; nor depreciate surrounding property value. Staff Response: The proposed building height remains below the R-1 district’s maximum permitted height of 25 feet and meets all applicable zoning, building, and MRCCA standards. No adverse impacts to health, safety, or welfare have been identified. The proposed height increase does not alter the single-family residential use or generate additional traffic. Access and on- site parking remain consistent with code requirements. The proposed structure is compatible in scale and character with surrounding development. One adjacent home is 25 feet tall, and the proposed height (21 feet, 11.75 inches) is within that context. The home is also proposed to be setback 14.7-ft from the north side property line and 14.1-ft from the Page 166 of 194 south side property line, which exceeds the minimum 10-ft setback for single-family development in R-1. Staff finds no evidence that the height request as proposed in this CUP application would negatively impact property values. D) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: The project supports the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for neighborhood reinvestment and compatibility in infill development. The applicant has revised the design to conform with roof pitch standards, and the proposed height is modest, reasonable, and consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance. Alternatives: 1. Approve the CUP request for 1867 Hunter Lane, which would allow for the construction of a new single-family home based on the findings-of-fact that the proposed project is compliant with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, with certain conditions; or 2. Deny the CUP request for 1867 Hunter Lane, based on the revised or amended findings- of-fact that the application does not meet certain policies and standards of City Code as determined by the Planning Commission; or 3. Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant; Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota State Statute 15.99. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by M&M Home Contractors for the property at 1867 Hunter Lane, with the following conditions: 1.A building permit must be approved and issued by the City prior to the commencement of any work. All applicable zoning, building, and MRCCA requirements shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 2.The building height shall not exceed 21 feet, 11.75 inches, as measured per definition of Building height in City Code. 3.The building shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and dated 9/5/2025. 4.Street-facing ornamental roof elements exceeding a 9:12 pitch shall be permitted as subordinate features, provided they do not contribute to the overall building height measurement. Attachments: 1.Findings of Fact for Approval 2.Site Location Map 3.Certificate of Survey and Site Plan 4.1867 Hunter Lane Architectural Construction Plans (9/5/25) 5.Packet Addendum - Pubic Comments Received as of 9/25/25 Page 167 of 194 Planning Case 2025-12 (MRCCA Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane) Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 1867 Hunter Lane The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1.The proposed construction of a new single family home is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for property within the R-1 Low Density Residential Zoning District. 2.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 3.The construction of the home as shown in the provided plans represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood. Page 168 of 194 6666666 6666666 66666666666666666666666666! "" ³³³³! ³ ³ ³ ³ ³³" """ " " "" "³³ ³³" ³* ³ ³³ ³ ³³** * ³ * ! ³ * **6666666666666 6 FMFMFMFMFMFMFM 6 6 6 66 66666!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 1885 1253 1889 1875 1881 1860 1880 1890 1870 1850 1254 1819 1845 1855 1867 1154 1827 1903 1175 1840 1833 1901 1247 1905 1831 1885 1907 1835 1911 1830 1836 1902 1838 1235 1908 1908 1914 1151 1916 1841 1851 1859 1865 1871 1875 1199 11871205 1921 11551171 1145 1242 1892 1919 1838 1248 1145 1920 1840 1230 HUNTER LNORCHARD PL SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY HUNTER CT ORCHARD CIRGLENHILL RDNearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial Map1867 Hunter Lane Date: 7/18/2025 City of Mendota Heights0210 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 169 of 194 Page 170 of 194 Page 171 of 194 Page 172 of 194 F.D.RADON -UPUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGWOOD10'X10'STAIRCASEFEATURESFURNACEWATER HEATERSUMP BASKETFLOOR DRAINWASHERDRYERLAUNDRY SINKFIREPLACESINKDISHWASHERREFRIGERATORVANITY/SINKTOILETSHOWERTUB/SHOWERUNITDOORWINDOWCLOSETSHELVINGSUPPORTPOSTSTRUCTURALBEAMSTAIRCASEINFORMATIONROOMNAMEATTIC ACCESSNOTE: KEY SHOWS INFORMATION/DETAILS THAT ARE NOT TYPICALLYNOTED, REFER TO PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/DETAILSSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG.3220 SQ.FTUNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 171 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 3391 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG.2324 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 1266 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3590 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2057 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:7601 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 9038 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25SHEET INDEX::::C COVERA1FRONT ELEVATIONA2 LEFT ELEVATIONA3 REAR ELEVATIONA4 RIGHT ELEVATIONA5 ROOF PLANA6 FOUNDATION PLANA7 FINISHED BASEMENT PLANA8 FIRST FLOOR PLANSA9 SECOND FLOOR PLAND1 BUILDING SECTIONSD2 BUILDING SECTIOND3 BUILDING SECTIOND4 BUILDING SECTIOND5 DETAILSD6 DETAILSR1 RADON DETAILSS1 BASEMENT WALL BRACINGS2 1ST FLOOR BRACINGS3 2ND FLOOR BRACING & DETAILS1. ALL CEILINGS ARE TO HAVE 5/8" NON-SAGGYPSUM BOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS ARE TO HAVE 12" GYPSUMBOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. GARAGE CEILING AND WALLS THAT ADJOINHOUSE WALLS ARE TO BE 58" GYPSUMBOARD PER CODE.1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE DOUBLE PANEGLASS PANELS WITH LOW-E RATINGS.2. ANY WINDOW WITHIN 24" OF A DOOR SWING MUSTBE TEMPERED PER CODE.3. ANY WINDOW ABOVE A TUB/WET AREA MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.4. ANY WINDOW WITHIN A STAIRWAY MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.5. WINDOW GLAZING MUST BE AT LEAST 18" A.F.F.WHEN WINDOW IS ABOVE 6' FROM GRADE. IF WITHIN18", WINDOW MUST BE TEMPERED.6. ALL BEDROOMS TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE WINDOWTHAT HAS A CLEAR EGRESS OPENING OF 5.7 SQ. FT.WITH MIN. DIMENSIONS OF 24" IN HEIGHT AND 20"IN WIDTH, SILL HEIGHT NOT TO BE GREATER THAN 44"A.F.F.7. WINDOWS WITH SILLS WITHIN 3' OF THE FLOORTHEY SERVE AND ARE 72" ABOVE GRADE MUST EITHERHAVE A FALL PREVENTION OR OPENING LIMITERDEVICE PER CODE.1. ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TOBE VERIFIED AND INSTALLED PER CODE BY APPROVEDTRADES AND INSTALLERS.2. HVAC CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LAYOUT FORDUCT-RUNS BEFORE INSTALLATION, IF MODIFICATIONIS REQUIRED, REPORT INFORMATION/CHANGES TOCONTRACTOR & LITTFIN DESIGN.1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 16" O.C. WITH ADOUBLE TOP PLATE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. WALL FRAMING SHALL BE S.P.F. STUD GRADE ORBETTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (U.N.O.)3. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE PER PLAN4. ALL EXTERIOR HEADERS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 BEARING STUD & (1) 2X6 FULL HEIGHT KINGSTUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O. (REVIEW PLANS)5. ALL INTERNAL HEADERS & BEAMS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 OR (1)2X4 BEARING STUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O.6. EXTERIOR SHEATHING SHALL BE 7/16" MATERIALCONSISTING OF ORIENTED STRAND BOARD (OSB).-ALLFLOOR AND CEILING SYSTEMS TO BE CHECKED ANDDESIGNED BY THE DESIGNATED MANUFACTURER.FLOOR PLANS TO BE ON SITE.7. HEADER SIZES ARE TO BE USED PERPLAN AND DEVIATION FROM ANY SIZE MUST BEAPPROVED BY DESIGNERS.8. PRESSURE TREADED WOOD IS TO BE USED WHEREWOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE AND AT 2X6MUD SILL. TREATED MEMBERS TO BE S.Y.P.#2 ORBETTER.9. FOR OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS (OR WALLS W/LATERAL LOADING:a. 0'-0" - 4'-0"= 1 JACK STUDb. 4'-0" - 8'-0"= 2 JACK STUDSc. 8'-0" - 12'-0" = 3 JACK STUDSd. GREATER THAN 12' = CONSULT ENG.10. POSTS CALLED OUT ARE NUMBER OFTRIMMER/JACK STUDS REQUIRED PER SIDE OFOPENING.1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONSYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED FOR A 2000 P.SF. SOIL.2. FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE FULL HEIGHT ATUNBALANCED FILL GREATER THAN 3'4".3. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MINIMUM @ 6'O.C. MAX. 12" MIN, FROM EACH END. MINIMUM OF 2BOLTS IN EACH SILL PLATE (REFER TO STRUCTURALPAGES).4. PAD FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IS TO BE LOCATED(3") FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING TYP. (WHENREQUIRED)5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PAGES FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING RE-BAR/ETC.6. CCOVERSHEETSCALED PRINT @ 24X36SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE IRC-1-2020 MINNESOTA STATE RESIDENTIAL CODE-2023 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE MECHANICAL & FUEL GASCODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE-2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODEDESIGNED WITH 2000 PSI SOILS, ALL FOUNDATIONCONSTRUCTION MUST FACTOR IN THIS AT A MINIMUM.DESIGNED WITH "EXPOSURE B" CLASSIFICATIONS ANDWINDGUSTS OF 115 MPH PER 2020 MN RESIDENTIAL CODEREGULATIONS.-ALL FOUNDATION WALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATIONUSED TO CONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS TOBE ON SITE WHEN POURING OR BUILDING WALLS.-ALL STRUCTURAL BEAMS, POSTS & TALL WALLS ARETO BE BUILT PER I-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSES ARETO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERSSPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSSPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE ON SITE DURINGINSTALLATION.-SH3050 EQUALS SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2646 EQUALS FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-20.2. ALL ATTIC SPACES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-49.3. ALL FLOOR SPACES OVER UNCONDITIONEDSPACE OR CANTILEVERED ARE TO BEINSULATED TO MIN. R30.Page 173 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION1R 5 '-6 "4'-0"2'-8 1/4"4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZEPER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARE CMUBASE W/STONE VENEER & 3" PRECAST CAP PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.R7'-3 1/2"4'-0"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"10'-0"8 1/4"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"8'-6"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4'-9 3/4"2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.HANGING PORCH LIGHTBELOW ROOF.21'-11 3/4"PANEL MATERIALPER SPEC.PITCH CHANGEMETAL CORNERSPER SPEC.17'-8"20'-6"14/12 ROOF PITCHW/ 2' OVER HANG14/12 ROOF PITCHW/ 2' OVER HANG14/12 ROOF PITCHW/ 2' OVER HANG12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.SMART PANELMATERIAL PER SPEC.SMART PANELMATERIAL PER SPEC.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A1FRONTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 174 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION14'-0"4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIMDECK POST PER PLANNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"METAL CORNERSPER SPEC.METAL CORNERSPER SPEC.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.5 1/2"SECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0" 6"X6" COLUMN DETAIL4CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTMETAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.P.T.(OR)CEDAR POST-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A2LEFTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 175 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REAR ELEVATION1PITCH CHANGE4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIM12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILINGDECK POSTSPER PLAN8'-7 1/8"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"METAL CORNERSPER SPEC.METAL CORNERSPER SPEC.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.5 1/2"SECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0"6"X6" COLUMN DETAIL4CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTMETAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.P.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTDRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A3REARELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 176 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION14'-0"2'-8 1/4"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER4" TRIM PER SPEC.DECORATIVE CEDARBRACKET PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.METAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOF8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4"SHADOW BOARDPER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARECMU BASE W/STONE VENEER& 3" PRECAST CAPPER DETAIL3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.PITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGE5'-3"5 1/2"10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM5'-3"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILING2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"6"3'-4"5'-9 1/2"4'-3"20'-4"8'-5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"DECK POSTSPER PLANMETAL CORNERSPER SPEC.SMART PANELMATERIAL PER SPEC.1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°5 1/2"SECTIONTOP3/4" = 1'-0" 6"X6" COLUMN DETAIL4CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLANP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTP.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTMETAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ TOP8" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.P.T.(OR)CEDAR POSTDRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A4RIGHTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 177 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN1RADON -OUT 1'-0" TYP4:12SLOPEVALLEYRIDGE VENT14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPERIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENTRIDGE VENT7:12SLOPEPITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPE9:12SLOPE9:12SLOPE4:12SLOPEVALLEYVALLE YVALLEY14:12SLOPE14:12SLOPEBARREL VAULTPER EXTERIORSVALLEY2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP6" TYP6" TYP6" TYP6" TYP6" TYP6" TYP1'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP6" TYP6" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP2'-0" TYPVALLEYVALLEY1'-0" TYPVALLEY2'-0" TYP2'-0" TYP1'-0" TYPVALLEY9:12SLOPE9:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE7:12SLOPE9:12SLOPE9:12SLOPEVALLEY2'-0" TYP14:12SLOPE6" TYP1'-0" TYP1'-0" TYP14:12SLOPE1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6' OF ALL ROOF LINES,EXTEND BARRIER MIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY, COVERENTIRE FACE OF ROOF SADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATER BARRIER AS NEEDED INFIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PER IRC CODEREGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS, FIREPLACE VENTS,AND OTHER PENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF OR WALLS TOEXTEND THROUGH REAR OF HOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS ORROOFING MUST BE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS AND IRC CODEREGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOMS OFWINDOWS AND ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFS ARE TO BEDROPPED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHED PER CODE9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD, COMPOSITE WOOD,AND ANY OTHER WOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF 3" OR PER TRADESPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TO BE COMPOSITEWOOD AND SIZED TO COVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A5ROOFPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 178 of 194 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)P.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILINGUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGNOTE:DECK FOOTINGS SIZED TOACCOMODATE FUTUREROOF OVER PORCH.FTG/POST A: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST B: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 24" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST C: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 26" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FOOTING NOTES:BACKFILL W/ GRAVEL/SANDCOMPACTED FILL BELOW FOOTINGSUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGF.D.RADON -UP 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C.SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)F.D. 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)C JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC J6"8"8"6"8"8"8"8"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"8"6"8"10"1'-0"6"8"4'-3"3'-2"36'-3"43'-8"1'-0"57'-2"22'-0"15'-9 1/4"6'-0"2 3/4"123'-10"9'-8"6'-6"6'-6"2'-0"1'-10"18'-0"1'-10"8"9'-0"1'-4"8"9'-0"1'-4"21'-8"11'-0"11'-4"11'-0"1'-0"11'-10"16'-0"10'-6"1'-0"2'-6"56'-0"6"6"8"10"5'-10"6'-0"5'-0 3/4"5'-5 1/4"4'-0"101'-10"24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.9'-0"9'-0"10'-9 1/4"11'-3 1/4"4'-8 1/2"12'-3"16'-11 1/2"22'-0 1/2"39'-0"2'-0"18'-0"59'-0"9 1/4"7'-6 1/2"2 3/4"8'-0"12'-4"15'-9 1/4"2 3/4"4'-0"16'-0"2'-0"4'-0"6"23'-2"8"9 1/2"3'-2"8'-8 3/4"8'-3 3/4"13'-4 1/2"7'-4"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"9'-8"11'-8"4'-1"3'-6"3'-6"2'-2"5'-9"36'-8"61'-4"8"17'-4"2'-6"8"11'-11"6'-0"17'-3"4'-8 1/2"11"5'-3"2'-2"4'-3"4'-3"6'-1 1/2"8"2'-10"7'-7"2'-6"8 1/2"3'-10"10"11'-6"1'-2"8"8"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.36" CODE RAILING20'-4"37'-8"1'-0"2 3/4"8'-9 1/4"8'-9 1/4"2 3/4"18'-0"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.7 1/4"5 1/2"4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULARCOMPACTED FILL4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER DROPPED 1'-4 3/4"6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULAR COMPACTED FILLSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3220 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 171 UNFINISHED SQUARE FEET FOUNDATION PLAN1MIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERFOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE,OR WALKOUTS HAVECANTILEVERED SILLS.REFER TO SECTIONS FORADDITIONAL SPANCRETEINFORMATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION1D11D22D11D3/D4(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEEN WINDOWS(2)11-7/8" 2.0E LVLDROPPED BEAM ABV.28"X28"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL FLUSH BEAM ABV.XPOINT LOADSFROM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVLFLUSH BEAM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGSPOINT LOADFROM ABV.28"X28"X12" PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12" CONC.PAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4'S EACH WAY, MIN.XPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12" CONC.PAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4'S EACH WAY, MIN.XPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGXFUTURE POINTLOAD FROM ABV.POINT LOADS FROM ABV.52"X52"X16" SPREAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4REBAR DOWELS GOING BOTH DIRECTIONSIN BOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING40"X40"X16" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTINGX28"X28"X12" PADFOOTINGSP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGFTG/POST"A"(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"A"FTG/POST"C"(3)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"B"FTG/POST"B"8"8"8"32"X32"X14" SPREAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS IN BOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING4'-8"HATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 6"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSFLOOR DRAIN UNDERDROPPED BOWLING ALLEY TOBE CONNECTED TO SUMPCONFIRM BOWLING ALLEYTROUGH SIZE WITH BOWLINGALLEY MANUFACTURER86'-0"1'-8 1/2"1'-6"12'-7 1/2"STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.TEMP.10" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLL W/ #5'S VERTICAL@ 18" O.C. AND #4'S HORIZONTAL @ 24" O.C.,MINIMUM. (OFFESET TO INSIDE FACE, TYPICAL.)2"2'-6"10"6"(3)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAM5 1/2"(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWSCONTINUE STEEL COLUMNS FROMLEVEL ABOVE TO FOUNDATIONCONTINUE STEEL COLUMNS FROMLEVEL ABOVE TO FOUNDATIONMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVER5'-4"11'-6 1/2"11'-0"3'-5"7'-7 1/4"8"8"8"2'-0"9'-5"23'-9"7"98 101112131415161724"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.5'-10"2"30"X30"X12" PADFOOTINGSPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.X9 3/4"(3)14" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV.32"X32"X14" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING6" CONCRETE SLAB OVER WATER BARRIER INSTALLED "SHINGLESTYLE" AND EXTENDING 6" ABOVE SLAB ON FRONT WALL AND OUTTO FRONT SIDE OF PORCH FOUNDATION WALL. 3/4" TREATEDPLYWOOD OVER 7-1/4" 2.0E LVL JOISTS SPACED 16" O.C.,CONNECTED TO 2X8 TREATED LEDGER BOARDS ON EACH SIDE,BOLTEDINTO WALLS W/ (3) 1/2" MIN. SIZE BOLTS ANCHORED INTOWALLS EVERY 12" O.C., INSTALL R-49 INSULATION BETWEEN JOISTSW/ VAPOR BARRIER & SHEETROCK AT INTERIOR SIDE OF CEILING.3'-2"HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOILCONDITION- VERIFY ON SITE.2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FANSDSD1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING, GRADE AT FRONT ORFRONT OF GARAGE DOORS IS CONSIDERED 0'0" ON THISFOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER. (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARETRIMMERS, MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONSTO BE INCLUDED AS WELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREASAND DOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAMEMATERIAL AS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE,BLOCKING MAY BE "BROKEN" BETWEEN LEVELS U.N.O.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER, SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB ORPLYWOOD SHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BEREFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKINGW/ CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD. ATL: 16 GA 1-34",3" @ EDGES/ 6" AT FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILEDOR SCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C.@ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10.REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONALFRAMING INFORMATION.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A6FOUNDATIONPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 179 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3220 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 171 UNFINISHED SQUARE FEET FINISHED BASEMENT PLAN1F.D.CONCRETELVP23'4"X21'11"TILECARPET11'X12'10"LVPUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGRADON -UP6'-0"5'-2"6"6"8'-5 1/2"16'-0"11'-2"10'-6"2 1/2"2 1/2"4'-9 1/4"4 1/2"5'-9 1/2"2'-1 1/2"4'-8 1/2"7 1/4"11'-3 1/4"10'-9 1/4"9'-0"8'-0"6"6'-10"22'-0 1/2"17'-0"39'-0"2'-0"6"4'-0"2'-0"1'-0"3'-8 1/2"8'-1 1/2"3'-6"6'-10"6 1/2"9'-9"8 1/2"4'-4"4'-0"2'-0"11'-7 1/2"5'-4"7'-9 1/2"10'-10 1/2"2'-6"2 1/2"2 1/2"1'-0"7 1/4"11'-3 1/2"5'-3"4'-8 1/2"11"4'-5 1/2"5'-10"4'-10"23'-10"8'-0"FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL@ FULL FOUNDATION WALL,HOLD OFF WALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS.2 1/2"6"15'-4"(1)SHELF/(1)ROD5 1/2"36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING15'-9 1/4"6'-2 3/4"8'-0"13'-4"22'-0"21'-4"4'-0"2'-0"16'-0"7 1/4"17'-0"Curtain Wall (opening spans11'-6" across bowling lanes)Ball ReturnTouchscreenRegulation size bowling lane(60' from center of head pin to foul line)87'4"X16'3/22'3"7'-10"3'-8"11'-6"7 1/4"7 1/4"NOTE:DECK FOOTINGS SIZED TOACCOMODATE FUTUREROOF OVER PORCH.16'-6"GUTTERGUTTERGUTTERGUTTERBALL RETURNLANE 2LANE 1Foul Line Foul Line28'-3"70'-4 1/2"1'-4 1/2"6'-0"4 1/2"4 1/2"42'-0"58'-0"46'-5 1/2"11'-6 1/2"4 1/2"4 1/2"4 1/2"21'-0"2'-0"4 1/2"4 1/2"4 1/2"20'-0"11'-0"11'-4"18'-6"9'-4"4 1/2"4 1/2"4 1/2"4 1/2"1'-6"2'-0"4'-4"7'-4"10'-10 1/2"1'-2 1/2"3 1/2"5'-1 1/4"7 1/2"9'-10 1/2"6"12'-1"8 1/2"16'-6"2'-0"22'-8"6 1/2"UP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING36" CODE RAILING1D11D22D11D3/D46"6"FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ FULLFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFFWALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS.FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL @ FULLFOUNDATION WALL, HOLD OFFWALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS.FRAME OUT 2X4 WALL@ LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALL,HOLD OFF WALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS -FINISH W/ WOOD CAP AS NEEDEDFRAME OUT 2X4 WALL@ LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALL,HOLD OFF WALL 1" & SHEETROCKFINISHED SIDE PER DETAILS -FINISH W/ WOOD CAP AS NEEDEDFRAME OUT 2X4 WALL@ LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL, HOLD OFF WALL 1" &SHEETROCK FINISHED SIDEPER DETAILS - FINISH W/WOOD CAP AS NEEDEDTEMP.11'-6"2'-6"5 1/2"1'-6"12'-9 1/4"5 1/2"2'-0"13'-0"3'-4"6'-2 3/4"7'-6 1/2"5'-9 1/2"TILE4'-4"5 1/2"2'-6"3'-0"2'-11 1/2"TILECONCRETE10'-5 1/2"16'-6"5 1/2"TILE8'6"X10'VENTILATION REQUIREDTILE5'-6"4'-4"5'-9 1/2"5 1/2"2'-6"2'-10"98 10111213141516171'-1 1/4"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOILCONDITION- VERIFY ON SITE.2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FANSDSD1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING, GRADE AT FRONT ORFRONT OF GARAGE DOORS IS CONSIDERED 0'0" ON THISFOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER. (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARETRIMMERS, MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONSTO BE INCLUDED AS WELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREASAND DOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAMEMATERIAL AS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE,BLOCKING MAY BE "BROKEN" BETWEEN LEVELS U.N.O.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER, SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB ORPLYWOOD SHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BEREFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKINGW/ CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD. ATL: 16 GA 1-34",3" @ EDGES/ 6" AT FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILEDOR SCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C.@ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10.REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONALFRAMING INFORMATION.DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A7 FINISHEDBASEMENTPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 180 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2324 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 1266 GARAGE SQUARE FEET FIRST FLOOR PLAN1CONCRETEWOOD26'8"X21'9"WOODTILEWOOD15'8"X16'WOODCONCRETE54'X22'/24'WOOD11'x11'8"F.D.WOOD16'3"X17'WOOD12'10"X17'WOOD9'7"X9'TILEWOODDN (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGUP (19) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)RODRADON -UPTEMP.TEMP.TEMP.6"6"5'-1 1/4"6'-6"4'-4 3/4"6'-0"6"6"6'-0"6"6"16'-0"12'-0"10'-6"6"6"6"6"5'-0"5'-0"6"6"6"6"2'-0"3'-6"10'-0"3'-6"9'-8"7'-2"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"5 1/2"6"6"6"6"7 1/4"16'-10"4'-2"6"10'-6"1'-6"9'-0"6"2'-0"18'-0"2'-0"6"9'-0"1'-6"17'-0"11'-0"22'-0"11'-0"6'-6"1'-6"2'-0"2'-0"8"5'-4"6'-0"8"10'-8"8"12'-0"8"5'-4"6'-0"1'-0"1'-0"6'-6"5'-0"5'-0"10'-0"6'-6"38'-0"6'-0"2'-6"9'-7 1/2"20'-5 1/2"3'-9 3/4"6'-1 1/4"30'-1"9'-11"6'-6"10'-6"8'-6"8'-7 1/4"11'-1 1/2"10'-9 1/4"9'-0"9'-0"17'-1 1/4"21'-10 3/4"39'-0"18'-0"57'-0"44'-0"25'-0"36'-6"61'-6"2'-0"61'-6"98'-0"102'-0"2'-6"10'-0"6'-7 1/4"1'-6"5'-6"6'-8"2'-6"5'-3"5'-3"1'-2 1/2"4'-0"13'-8 1/2"7'-11 1/2"9'-6 1/2"5'-1"1'-11 1/2"3'-4 1/2"6'-0"6'-0"6'-6"10'-0"2'-0"4'-0 1/2"7'-8 1/2"5 1/2"5'-11"5 1/2"7'-3"7 1/4"7'-6 1/2"5 1/2"9'-10"5 1/2"6'-6"2'-6"1'-0"5 1/2"5 1/2"6"58'-6"ASSUME STONE TOCEILING FOR FLOORLOADING @ F.P.FLOOR MANUFACTURERTO ASSUME ADDITIONALWEIGHT @ COUNTERTOPSASSUME STONE TOCEILING FOR FLOORLOADING @ F.P.GIRDER TRUSS ABV.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.(2)11-7/8" 2.0E LVL FLUSH BEAM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV. 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)5'-3"W16X50 (A992) ASTM STEEL FLUSH BEAM ABV.GIRDER TRUSS ABV. 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 20" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)(2)X10 FLUSH BEAM ABV.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM ABV. 24" O.C.(OR) PER TRUSS PER MANUF.7 1/4"3'-9"COMPOSITE16'X18'22'-0"8'-0"13'-4"16'-0"2'-0"4'-0"36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILINGCOMPOSITE6'X8'18'-0"POST AT CENTEROF STAIRCASE2'-0"5'-8"2'-4"5'-10 1/2"1'-8 1/2"2'-9"5'-4"9'-8 1/2"2'-0"DN (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING1D11D22D11D3/D45'-10 1/2"2'-6"5'-3 1/2"3'-3"7'-6"5'-9"3'-6"(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEEN WINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(2)X10 FLUSH BEAM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV.7 1/4"(2)X10 DROPPED BEAM ABV.(2)X10 DROPPED BEAM ABV.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.23'-4"GIRDER TRUSS ABV.HATCH INDICATES 2-PLY EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS (2X6 1.3E LSL OR EQ.) SPACED AT 16"O.C. TIMBERSTRAND MATERIAL OR BETTER(2-PLY TIMBER-STRAND KING STUDS @EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS IN WALL)HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.HATCHED AREA INDICATESSPECIAL FRAMING PERNOTE #5 UNDER FLOORPLAN NOTES ON THIS PAGE.CANTILEVER FLOORSYSTEM 2'-0"(2)X10 FLUSH BEAM7 1/4"(2)X10 FLUSHBEAM ABV.POST TO SUPPORTFUTURE DECK ROOFPOST TO SUPPORTFUTURE DECK ROOFBOLTED CONNECTIONSAT BOTH TOP AND BOTTOMBOLTED CONNECTIONSAT BOTH TOP AND BOTTOMHATCH INDICATES 2-PLY EXTERIOR WALL STUDS (2X61.3E LSL OR EQ.) SPACED AT 16" O.C. TIMBERSTRANDMATERIAL OR BETTER (2-PLY TIMBER-STRAND KINGSTUDS @ EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS IN WALL)2'-6"1'-0"EPDM/ TPO FLAT ROOFSYSTEM CONSTRUCTEDW/ 2X10 JOISTS.BARREL VAULTTRUSSES ABOVEPER TRUSSMANUFACTURER1'-0"GIRDER TRUSS ABV.GIRDER TRUSS ABV.CONTINUE STEEL COLUMNSTO FOUNDATION2'-4"3'-7 1/2"(1)S./(1)R.1'-8"5'-0"10'-1 1/2"5'-0"7 1/4"7 1/4"7 1/4"2'-6"1'-6"3'-11 1/2"5 1/2"987654321543211011124' WIDE CEDAR STAIR W/ 7-3/4"MAX. RISERS & 10" TREADS -INSTALL 3' TALL CODE RAIL WHENMORE THAN 3 RISERS OR 30"POINT LOADFROM ABOVETEMP.TEMP.TEMP.1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER.2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.4. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREAS ANDDOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAME MATERIALAS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE.5. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER,SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.6. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB OR PLYWOODSHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BE REFERRED TO AS1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).7. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKING W/CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD.8. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILED ORSCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ ADHESIVE PERSPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12" O.C.@ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).9. REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMINGINFORMATION.1. ALL NON-BEARING FRAMING IS TO BE 16" O.C.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS TO HAVE A DOUBLE TOP PLATEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X6 WOODSTUDS WITH 7/16" OSB SHEATHING, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.4. ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X4 WOODSTUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5. ALL COLUMN SIZES ARE TO BE CONTINUEDTHROUGH FLOOR TRUSS SPACES WHENSPANNING MORE THAN 1 FLOOR.6. ALL WOOD MATERIALS ARE TO BE PROTECTEDPER CODE & MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS WHILEBEING STORED ON SITE. 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FAN1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING GRADE ISCONSIDERED 0'0" ON THIS FOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARETO BE ILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE ATALL STAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TOCONTINUE TO LANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OFSTAIRS. CONTRACTOR & INSTALLER TO VERIFY IFADDITIONAL GRASPABLE HANDRAIL IS INSTALLEDOR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAIL TO CONTINUE.4.12" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDEOF STAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARINGWALL, 16" O.C. STUDS6. INDICATES EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS SPACED AT 12" O.C. TIMBERSTRANDMATERIAL OR BETTER (2-PLY TIMBER-STRANDKING STUDS @ EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS INWALL)7. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOORSYSTEM PER IRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12"GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38" STRUCTURAL BOARDADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4 MIN. MATERIAL,PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING, SEPARATINGAREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.SDSDPROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 47507-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALLDRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A8FIRST FLOORPLANSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 181 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2057 FINISHED SQUARE FEET SECOND FLOOR PLAN1CARPET15'8"X16'TILEIN-FLOOR HEATTILETILETILECARPETWOODCARPET12'6"X12'8"CARPET12'8"X11'2"CARPET14'1"X17'WOODDN (19) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)RODRADON -UPTEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.TEMP.6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"5 1/2"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"6"14'-2 3/4"2'-5 1/4"16'-8"11'-1 1/2"10'-8 1/2"38'-6"1'-0"39'-6"8'-6"8'-3 1/2"4'-0 3/4"4'-0 3/4"9'-0"9'-0"16'-9 1/2"8'-1 1/2"7'-7 1/2"39'-0"18'-0"59'-0"2'-0"2'-3"4'-2 1/2"3'-9"2'-3"6'-1 3/4"6'-10 1/4"6'-5 1/2"6'-0"14'-6 1/2"12'-5 1/2"13'-0"5'-0"5'-0"7'-7"3'-11"3'-6"11'-6"13'-1 1/2"13'-2 1/2"10'-0"3'-6"40'-0"2'-0"59'-0"5'-3"5'-3"1'-2 1/2"5'-0"6'-8"6'-7 1/2"7'-11 1/2"8'-1 1/2"6'-4"9'-11 1/2"3'-6"3'-6"1'-3 1/2"6'-3"5'-6"1'-0"6'-3"8'-10"6'-0 1/2"6'-0 1/2"14'-10 1/2"8'-0"1'-0"4'-3 1/2"7'-8 1/2"4'-2"2'-6"10'-8 1/2"2'-6"2'-6"11'-0"2'-6"8'-11"2'-6"5 1/2"3'-3 1/2"13'-2 1/2"3'-6"4'-7"5'-7"7'-7 1/2"1'-5 1/2"1'-5 1/2"6'-3 1/2"GIRDER TRUSS ABV.GIRDER TRUSS ABV.GIRDER TRUSS ABV.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEM ABV. 24"O.C. (OR) PER TRUSS PER MANUF.TILE2'-2"2'-6"(1)SHELF/(1)ROD6'-3 1/2"4'-0 1/2"6'-11 1/2"4'-3 1/2"(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD(1)SHELF/(1)ROD1'-8 1/2"CARPET5 1/2"2'-0"2'-5 1/2"5 1/2"5'-6"5'-3 1/2"7'-8 1/2"1'-6"2'-4 1/2"1'-0"1'-0"1'-6"2'-0"1'-6"2'-0"4'-0"1D11D22D11D3/D4ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.ROOF TRUSS SYSTEMABV. 24" O.C. (OR) PERTRUSS PER MANUF.HANGER AT FACEOF GIRDER(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWS(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEENWINDOWSHATCH INDICATES 2-PLY EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS (2X6 1.3E LSL OR EQ.) SPACED AT 16"O.C. TIMBERSTRAND MATERIAL OR BETTER(2-PLY TIMBER-STRAND KING STUDS @EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS IN WALL)HATCH INDICATES 2-PLY EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS (2X6 1.3E LSL OR EQ.) SPACED AT 16"O.C. TIMBERSTRAND MATERIAL OR BETTER(2-PLY TIMBER-STRAND KING STUDS @EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS IN WALL)3'-6"5"2'-4"4'-0 1/2"5 1/2"2'-0"5 1/2"7'-8 1/2"5'-6"4'-8"4'-6"3'-1"5 1/2"5 1/2"3'-1"4'-6"1'-1 1/2"6'-8"36" CODE RAILINGEPDM/ TPO FLATROOF SYSTEMCONSTRUCTEDW/ 2X10 JOISTS.ASSUME STONE TOCEILING FOR FLOORLOADING @ F.P.40'-0"5 1/2"3'-0"98765432110111213141516171819GIRDER TRUSS ABV.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 475071. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1)TRIMMER.2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESSNOTED).3. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSSMANUFACTURER.4. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREAS ANDDOWN TO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAME MATERIALAS COLUMN SUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE.5. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER,SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.6. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB OR PLYWOODSHEATHING & NAILED PER CODE (MAY BE REFERRED TO AS1/2" NOMINAL THICKNESS).7. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKING W/CLIPS, NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD.8. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILED ORSCREWED TO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ ADHESIVE PERSPEC. (OR) MIN. 6d COMMON NAILS 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12" O.C.@ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).9. REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMINGINFORMATION.1. ALL NON-BEARING FRAMING IS TO BE 16" O.C.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS TO HAVE A DOUBLE TOP PLATEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X6 WOODSTUDS WITH 7/16" OSB SHEATHING, UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.4. ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE 2X4 WOODSTUDS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5. ALL COLUMN SIZES ARE TO BE CONTINUEDTHROUGH FLOOR TRUSS SPACES WHENSPANNING MORE THAN 1 FLOOR.6. ALL WOOD MATERIALS ARE TO BE PROTECTEDPER CODE & MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS WHILEBEING STORED ON SITE. 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FAN1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING GRADE ISCONSIDERED 0'0" ON THIS FOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARETO BE ILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE ATALL STAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TOCONTINUE TO LANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OFSTAIRS. CONTRACTOR & INSTALLER TO VERIFY IFADDITIONAL GRASPABLE HANDRAIL IS INSTALLEDOR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAIL TO CONTINUE.4.12" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDEOF STAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARINGWALL, 16" O.C. STUDS6. INDICATES EXTERIOR WALLSTUDS SPACED AT 12" O.C. TIMBERSTRANDMATERIAL OR BETTER (2-PLY TIMBER-STRANDKING STUDS @ EACH SIDE OF OPENINGS INWALL)7. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOORSYSTEM PER IRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12"GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38" STRUCTURAL BOARDADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4 MIN. MATERIAL,PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING, SEPARATINGAREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.SDSD-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALLDRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25A9 SECOND FLOORPLANSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 182 of 194 CONCRETELVPWOODWOODPOST ATCENTER OFSTAIRCASE17 EQUAL RISERS TOTAL10'-4 1/8"19 EQUAL RISERS TOTAL11'-9 7/8"17'-9 3/8"6"10'-0"5'-3"ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD7 5/16"10"7 7/16"10"CODE RAILING SETBETWEEN 34" AND 36"ABOVE TREADSCODE RAILING SETBETWEEN 34" AND 36"ABOVE TREADSMAINTAIN MINIMUM 6'8"HEAD HEIGHT CLEARANCEPER CODE AT ENTIRESTAIRCASE20" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.18" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINTMIN. R-492X8 JOISTS2X8 JOISTSWOODR-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)REFER TO FLOOR PLANS ANDRADON SECTION FOR FLOOR DESIGNDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANSSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION THROUGH STAIRCASE11'-0"HEEL HEIGHTMIN. R-201'-0"14:12 INTERIOR PITCHCONCRETE54'X22'/24'MIN. R-4987'4"X16'3/22'3"11'-6"6"1'-4 1/4"FLOOR DRAIN1'-4 3/4"- 6" TOPPING LEVELER ON TOP- SLOPED OVER 4" OFFOAM INSULATION- 2X10 FRAMING W/ MIN.- R-49 INSULATION10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"8'-6"ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINTFLOOR DRAINMIN. R-49HEEL HEIGHTHEEL HEIGHTMIN. R-20MIN. R-20GARAGE BUMP-OUT BEYONDR-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)R-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)DRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANSDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANSSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION THROUGH GARAGE & BOWLING ALLEY29'-4"8"BOWLING ALLEY CONSTRUCTION& DETAILS BY OTHERS9'-4"8"DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D1BUILDINGSECTIONSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 183 of 194 CONCRETEWOOD26'X21'9"WOODCONCRETELVP23'4"X21'11"TILEIN-FLOOR HEATWOODCARPET12'8"X11'2"FIREPLACE BEYOND6"X6" DECORATIVE BEAMDECORATIVESOFFIT BEYONDARCHED OPENING BEYONDRADIUS CEILING AREAROUNDED ROOF SYSTEMPER TRUSS COMPANY ATPORCH AREA8"10'-1 1/8"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"10'-0"8 1/4"ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD20" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.18" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.MIN. R-49HEEL HEIGHTMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20R-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)REFER TO FLOOR PLANS ANDRADON SECTION FOR FLOOR DESIGNDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANSDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANSSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION THROUGH HOUSE & COVERED PORCH1R-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAMINSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATINGOVER EXPOSEDAREAS (PER DETAILS)6" CONCRETE SLAB OVERWATER BARRIER INSTALLED "SHINGLE STYLE" ANDEXTENDING 6" ABOVE SLAB ON FRONT WALL ANDOUT TO FRONT SIDE OF PORCH FOUNDATION WALL.3/4" TREATED PLYWOOD OVER 7-1/4" 2.0E LVL JOISTSSPACED 16" O.C., CONNECTED TO 2X8 TREATEDLEDGER BOARDS ON EACH SIDE, BOLTEDINTO WALLS W/ (3) 1/2" MIN. SIZE BOLTS ANCHOREDINTO WALLS EVERY 12" O.C., INSTALL R-49 INSULATIONBETWEEN JOISTS W/ VAPOR BARRIER & SHEETROCKAT INTERIOR SIDE OF CEILING.DROP FLOORFOR IN-FLOOR HEATMIN. R-49FOAM FILL AS REQ.CONCRETEEXTEND (1)#4 REBAR 3' INTO TOP OF FOUND.WALL. ANGLE TOP PORTION AND EXTEND INTOPORCH FLOOR MIN. 12" FROM EDGE OF WALL,SPACE REBAR EVERY 16". INSTALL (1)#4 REBARWITHIN TOP 12" OF WALL & ALSO AT CENTER OFWALL & WITHIN 3" OF SIDE OF WALL ADJACENT TOSOIL/BACKFILL.8'-0"7'-0"7'-7 3/4"6'-0"ARCHED OPENING BEYOND9'-0 3/4"7'-0"-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINT9'-0 3/4"7'-0"DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D2BUILDINGSECTIONSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 184 of 194 36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING32'-2" 7'-6" MIN.FOUL LINEDECORATIVE SOFFIT BEYONDWOOD16'3"X15'WOOD12'10"X17'WOOD9'7"X9'TILECOMPOSITE16'X18'COMPOSITE6'X8'TILETILECARPET12'6"X12'8"CARPET14'1"X17'P.T. 2X12 JOISTS PER PLANP.T. 2X12 JOISTS8"- 6" TOPPING LEVELER ON TOP- SLOPED OVER 4" OFFOAM INSULATION- 2X10 FRAMING W/ MIN.- R-49 INSULATIONFLOOR DRAIN1'-4 3/4"1'-4 1/2"ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD20" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.18" FLOOR TRUSSES PER MANUF.DECK POSTBEYOND-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINTMIN. R-49HEEL HEIGHTMIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20REFER TO FLOOR PLANS ANDRADON SECTION FOR FLOOR DESIGNDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANS87'4"X16'3/22'3"STAIRS BEYOND10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"BOWLING ALLEY CONSTRUCTION& DETAILS BY OTHERSR-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION @ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)7'-6 3/4"6'-0"4'-1"2'-6"42" HALF WALL & BAR TOPSCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION THROUGH OPEN DECK, HOUSE, GARAGE, & BOWLING ALLEY1DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D3BUILDINGSECTIONSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 185 of 194 87'4"X16'3/22'3"6'-0"32'-2" POWER DROPFOUL LINEWOOD9'7"X9'TILECONCRETE54'X22'/24'CARPET12'6"X12'8"-EPDM OR TPO ROOFING W/FLASHING PER OTHERS-BUILT-UP INSULATION AS REQ. TOSLOPE FLAT ROOF TO EDGES-3/4" OSB ROOF DECKING-2X10 JOISTS-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD8"FLOOR DRAIN- 6" TOPPING LEVELER ON TOP- SLOPED OVER 4" OFFOAM INSULATION- 2X10 FRAMING W/ MIN.- R-49 INSULATIONFLOOR DRAIN1'-4 1/2"MIN. R-49MIN. R-4910'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"9'-7 1/8"8'-6"ROOF TRUSSESPER MANUF.-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD-FIBERGLASS SHINGLES-15# (NOT#15) TAR PAPER/ICE-WATER BARRIER-15/32" OSB ROOF DECKING-MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES-R-49 INSULATION-POLY BARRIER-5/8" GYPSUM BOARD-FINISH MATERIAL PER ELEV.-HOUSE WRAP-7/16" OSB SHEATHING-2X6 FRAMING, 16" O.C.-R-20 INSULATION-VAPOR BARRIER-1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD-LATEX BASED PRIMER/ PAINTMIN. R-49HEEL HEIGHTMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20MIN. R-20 SPRAYFOAM @ RIMMIN. R-20R-5 FOIL FOAMINSULATION@ INTERIORR-10 RIGID FOAM INSULATION W/PROTECTIVE COATING OVEREXPOSED AREAS (PER DETAILS)REFER TO FLOOR PLANS ANDRADON SECTION FOR FLOOR DESIGNDRAIN TILE AS NOTEDON FOUNDATION PLANS1'-8"9'-4"BOWLING ALLEY CONSTRUCTION& DETAILS BY OTHERS7'-6 3/4"6'-0"SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION THROUGH OPEN DECK, HOUSE, GARAGE, & BOWLING ALLEY1DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D4BUILDINGSECTIONSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 186 of 194 3/4" = 1'-0"TYP. WALL SECT. @ 1ST FLOOR23/4" = 1'-0"EGRESS WELL SECTION53/4" = 1'-0"FLOOR CANTILEVER DETAIL73/4" = 1'-0"TYP. WALL SECTION @ EAVE13/4" = 1'-0"TYP. WALL SECT. @ FOOTING33/4" = 1'-0"STONE VENEER93/4" = 1'-0"SIDE GARAGE WALL DETAIL63/4" = 1'-0"SILL @ GARAGE DR.43/4" = 1'-0"STONE TO MASONRY CAULK DETAIL103/4" = 1'-0"LOOKOUT WALL SECTION83/4" = 1'-0"WALKOUT WALL SECTION11DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D5DETAILSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 187 of 194 NONEROOF TRUSS CONNECTION DETAIL4NONEOUTSIDE CORNER DETAIL53/4" = 1'-0" TUB/SHOWER 1/2 WALL23/4" = 1'-0"FIREPLACE CANTILEVER33/4" = 1'-0"DRAFTSTOP @ TUB11-1/2" = 1'-0"ENERGY CODE RIM DETAIL61-1/2" = 1'-0"STOOP RIM DETAIL71-1/2" = 1'-0"STOOP STEP DETAIL (as req.)8DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25D6DETAILSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 188 of 194 -SEAL ALL JOINTS, CRACKS OROTHER OPENINGS WITHPOLYURETHANE CAULK ORELASTOMERIC SEALANT ACCORDINGTO MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.-INSTALL PIPE AS STRAIGHT ASPOSSIBLE TO HELP CONDUCTIVEFLOW. ELBOWS ARE ALLOWED, BUTSHOULD BE AVOIDED IF POSSIBLE.-INSTALL LABLE READING "RADONREDUCTION SYSTEM" ON THE VENTPIPE AT EACH FLOOR AND INACCESSIBLE ATTICS.-MINIMUM 3" ABS, PVC OREQUIVALENT GAS TIGHT PIPE.1/2" = 1'-0" PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM DETAILS (REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATIONS)1-INSTALL PIPE INSULATION AT PIPEWHEN RUNNING THROUGH ATTICAREA, MIN. R-4 WRAPPED AROUND PIPE FROM CEILING TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK.-RADON VENT PIPE TO BE TERMINATEDAT LEAST 12" ABOVE SURFACE OFROOF.-MINIMUM 3" ABS, PVC OR EQUIVALENTGASTIGHT PIPE.-ROOF PENETRATION SEALING AT ROOF.-MIN. 24" DIAMETER CENTERED ONTHE AXIS OF THE VENT STACK.-MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 5'-INSTALL LIVE OUTLET IN ATTICNEAR WHERE FUTURE FAN MAY BEINSTALLED.-4" POURED CONCRETE SLAB-MIN. 6 MILL POLY BARRIER W/ 12" LAPPED SEAMS BELOW ENTIRE SLAB ON TOPOF GAS PERMEABLE LAYER-MIN. 4" GAS PERMEABLE LAYER BELOW BARRIER (CLEAN, COURSE AGGREGATEABLE TO PASS THROUGH A 2" SIEVE & BE RETAINED BY A1/4" SIEVE.-INSTALL PIPE AS STRAIGHT ASPOSSIBLE TO HELP CONDUCTIVEFLOW. ELBOWS ARE ALLOWED, BUTSHOULD BE AVOIDED IF POSSIBLE.-INSTALL LABEL READING "RADON REDUCTION SYSTEM" ON THE VENT PIPE AT EACH FLOOR AND IN ACCESSIBLE ATTICS.-MINIMUM 3" ABS, PVC OR EQUIVALENT GAS TIGHT PIPE.DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25R1RADONDETAILSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 189 of 194 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3220 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 171 UNFINISHED SQUARE FEET BASEMENT WALL BRACING PLAN14'-0"8'-0"3'-10 1/2"3'-10 1/2"4'-6"8'-3"10'-9"22'-8 3/4"22'-8 3/4"5'-9 1/2"9'-8"21'-4"10'-6"3'-0":1. ALL WALLS DESIGNED PER METHODCS-WSP OF THE 2020 MN CODE.2. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BECONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED WITH AMINIMUM 3/8" THICK WOOD PANEL.3. CONNECTION OF WOOD PANEL TOSTUDS SHALL BE 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. AT EDGES & 12" O.C. ATFIELD OF WOOD PANEL.4. STRUCTURAL PANELS (BRACEDWALLS) SHALL BE LOCATED AT EACHEND & AT LEAST EVERY 20' BETWEENPANELS.5. EXTERIOR BRACED WALL LINES SHALLHAVE A BRACED WALL PANEL AT EACHEND OF THE BRACED WALL LINE,EXCEPT FOR:-BRACED WALL PANELS AREPERMITTED TO BEGIN NO MORETHAN 10' FROM EACH END OF THEBRACED WALL LINE PROVIDEDTHAT A 24" PANEL MATCHINGTABLE R602.10.7 IS APPLIED.-THE END OF EACH BRACED WALLPANEL CLOSEST TO THE CORNERSHALL HAVE A TIE-DOWN DEVICEFASTENED TO THE STUD AT THEEDGE OF THE BRACED WALL PANELCLOSEST TO THE CORNER AND TOTHE FOUNDATION OR FRAMINGBELOW. THE TIE- DOWN DEVICESHALL BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDINGAN UPLIFT ALLOWABLE DESIGNVALUE OF AT LEAST 1800 LBS. THETIE-DOWN DEVICE SHALL BEINSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS.6. INTERIOR BRACED WALL LINES SHALLBE DESIGNED/BUILT PERINTERMITTENT METHOD "GB".-MINIMUM 1/2" GYPSUM BOARDAPPLIED TO EACH SIDE OF 2X4 (OR)2X6 STUD WALL @ 16" O.C.SPACING OF STUDS W/ DOUBLETOP PLATE AND SINGLE BTM.-ATTACH GYPSUM TO STUDS W/1-1/4" SCREWS (TYPE W OR S), 6"O.C. AT EDGE & 6" O.C. AT FIELD.-ALL GYPSUM BOARD JOINTS TO BESOLID BLOCKED W/ 2X MATERIAL7. () ALLFLOOR SYSTEMS BETWEEN BRACEDWALL PANELS TO HAVE A MIN. 2X4TOP & BOTTOM BLOCKING BOARDPARALLEL TO BRACED WALL PANELSW/ MIN. (3)16d NAILS ATTACHINGBOTTOM/TOP OF BRACED PANELPLATE TO FLOOR SYSTEM AT BRACEDPANEL WIDTH ONLY. 2X4 BLOCKINGTO BE SET BETWEEN FLOOR SYSTEMMEMBERS. SOLID RIM MAY BE USED(FIG. 5 & 6).8. () APPLY2X SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN ROOFSYSTEM MEMBERS OVER BRACEDWALL PANELS W/ 8d NAILS AT 6" O.C.ALONG LENGTH OF BRACED WALLPANELS WHEN HEEL IS 15.25" OR LESS(FIGURE 3, REFER TO FIG. #4 WHENOVER 15.25").9.NOTE: NOTES 7 & 8 ABOVE APPLY TOPERPENDICULAR FRAMING, WHENPARALLEL FLOORS/ROOF SYSTEMSARE PRESENT, THE FLOOR/ROOFSYSTEM IS TO HAVE BLOCKINGMATERIAL ALLOWING FOR NAILING OFBRACED WALL PANEL INTO SYSTEMABOVE/BELOW SAID WALL (FIGURE 6).BRACED WALL PANELS LOCATED ATEXTERIOR WALLS THAT SUPPORT ROOFRAFTERS OR TRUSSES (INCLUDING STORIESBELOW TOP STORY) SHALL HAVE THEFRAMING MEMBERS CONNECTED INACCORDANCE WITH:1. WHERE THE NET UPLIFT VALUE AT THETOP OF A WALL EXCEEDS 100 PLF,INSTALLING APPROVED UPLIFTFRAMING CONNECTORS TO PROVIDE ACONTINUOUS LOAD PATH FROM THETOP OF THE WALL TO THE FOUNDATIONOR TO A POINT WHERE THE UPLIFTFORCE IS 100 PLF OR LESS. THE NETUPLIFT VALUE SHALL BE ASDETERMINED BY ONE OF THEFOLLOWING:a. THE BASIC WIND SPEED DOES NOTEXCEED 115 MPH, THE WINDEXPOSURE CATEGORY IS B, THEROOF PITCH IS 5:12 OR GREATER,AND THE ROOF SPAN IS 32' OR LESS(OR)b. THE NET UPLIFT VALUE AT THE TOPOF A WALL DOES NOT EXCEED 100PLF. THE NET UPLIFT VALUE SHALLBE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCEWITH SECTION R802.11 AND SHALLBE PERMITTED TO BE REDUCED BY60 PLF FOR EACH FULL WALLABOVE.2. WHERE THE UPLIFT FORCE DOES NOTEXCEED 200 POUNDS, RAFTERS ANDTRUSSES SPACED NOT MORE THAN 24INCHES ON CENTER SHALL BEPERMITTED TO BE ATTACHED TO THEIRSUPPORTING WALL ASSEMBLIES INACCORDANCE WITH TABLE R602.3(1)a.: MINIMUM (3) 16d BOXNAILS OR (3) 10d COMMON NAILS. (2)TOE NAILS ON ONE SIDE AND (1)TOE NAIL ON OPPOSITE SIDE OFEACH RAFTER OR TRUSS. (MANUF.METAL CONNECTOR MAY BESUBSTITUTED, VERIFY W/ MANUF.DETAILS).b.:CONNECTION OF WOOD PANEL TOSTUDS SHALL BE MIN. 6d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. AT EDGES & 12" O.C.AT FIELD OF WOOD PANEL.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25S1BASEMENTWALL BRACINGPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 190 of 194 39'-3"5'-3"22'-0"37'-3"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2324 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 1266 GARAGE SQUARE FEET FIRST FLOOR WALL BRACING PLAN155'-0"11'-6"3'-6"6'-6"6'-6"3'-6"8'-4"6'-8"3'-0"3'-0"2'-4 3/4"2'-10 1/2"2'-10 1/2"2'-10 1/2"DASHED BOX INDICATESLOCATION OF EXTENDEDHEADER, EXTENDHEADER TO ENDS OF BOX,PER DIMENSIONS SHOWNDASHED BOX INDICATESLOCATION OF EXTENDEDHEADER, EXTENDHEADER TO ENDS OF BOX,PER DIMENSIONS SHOWNDASHED BOX INDICATESLOCATION OF EXTENDEDHEADER, EXTENDHEADER TO ENDS OF BOX,PER DIMENSIONS SHOWN4'-0"4'-0"6'-0"4'-6"6'-0"6'-0"2'-0"2'-0"1'-6"1'-6"4'-0"8'-0"8'-0"1'-10 1/2"1'-10 1/2"DASHED BOX INDICATESLOCATION OF EXTENDEDHEADER, EXTENDHEADER TO ENDS OF BOX,PER DIMENSIONS SHOWN3'-6":1. ALL WALLS DESIGNED PER METHODCS-WSP OF THE 2020 MN CODE.2. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BECONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED WITH AMINIMUM 3/8" THICK WOOD PANEL.3. CONNECTION OF WOOD PANEL TOSTUDS SHALL BE 8d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. AT EDGES & 12" O.C. ATFIELD OF WOOD PANEL.4. STRUCTURAL PANELS (BRACEDWALLS) SHALL BE LOCATED AT EACHEND & AT LEAST EVERY 20' BETWEENPANELS.5. EXTERIOR BRACED WALL LINES SHALLHAVE A BRACED WALL PANEL AT EACHEND OF THE BRACED WALL LINE,EXCEPT FOR:-BRACED WALL PANELS AREPERMITTED TO BEGIN NO MORETHAN 10' FROM EACH END OF THEBRACED WALL LINE PROVIDEDTHAT A 24" PANEL MATCHINGTABLE R602.10.7 IS APPLIED.-THE END OF EACH BRACED WALLPANEL CLOSEST TO THE CORNERSHALL HAVE A TIE-DOWN DEVICEFASTENED TO THE STUD AT THEEDGE OF THE BRACED WALL PANELCLOSEST TO THE CORNER AND TOTHE FOUNDATION OR FRAMINGBELOW. THE TIE- DOWN DEVICESHALL BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDINGAN UPLIFT ALLOWABLE DESIGNVALUE OF AT LEAST 1800 LBS. THETIE-DOWN DEVICE SHALL BEINSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS.6. INTERIOR BRACED WALL LINES SHALLBE DESIGNED/BUILT PERINTERMITTENT METHOD "GB".-MINIMUM 1/2" GYPSUM BOARDAPPLIED TO EACH SIDE OF 2X4 (OR)2X6 STUD WALL @ 16" O.C.SPACING OF STUDS W/ DOUBLETOP PLATE AND SINGLE BTM.-ATTACH GYPSUM TO STUDS W/1-1/4" SCREWS (TYPE W OR S), 6"O.C. AT EDGE & 6" O.C. AT FIELD.-ALL GYPSUM BOARD JOINTS TO BESOLID BLOCKED W/ 2X MATERIAL7. () ALLFLOOR SYSTEMS BETWEEN BRACEDWALL PANELS TO HAVE A MIN. 2X4TOP & BOTTOM BLOCKING BOARDPARALLEL TO BRACED WALL PANELSW/ MIN. (3)16d NAILS ATTACHINGBOTTOM/TOP OF BRACED PANELPLATE TO FLOOR SYSTEM AT BRACEDPANEL WIDTH ONLY. 2X4 BLOCKINGTO BE SET BETWEEN FLOOR SYSTEMMEMBERS. SOLID RIM MAY BE USED(FIG. 5 & 6).8. () APPLY2X SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN ROOFSYSTEM MEMBERS OVER BRACEDWALL PANELS W/ 8d NAILS AT 6" O.C.ALONG LENGTH OF BRACED WALLPANELS WHEN HEEL IS 15.25" OR LESS(FIGURE 3, REFER TO FIG. #4 WHENOVER 15.25").9.NOTE: NOTES 7 & 8 ABOVE APPLY TOPERPENDICULAR FRAMING, WHENPARALLEL FLOORS/ROOF SYSTEMSARE PRESENT, THE FLOOR/ROOFSYSTEM IS TO HAVE BLOCKINGMATERIAL ALLOWING FOR NAILING OFBRACED WALL PANEL INTO SYSTEMABOVE/BELOW SAID WALL (FIGURE 6).BRACED WALL PANELS LOCATED ATEXTERIOR WALLS THAT SUPPORT ROOFRAFTERS OR TRUSSES (INCLUDING STORIESBELOW TOP STORY) SHALL HAVE THEFRAMING MEMBERS CONNECTED INACCORDANCE WITH:1. WHERE THE NET UPLIFT VALUE AT THETOP OF A WALL EXCEEDS 100 PLF,INSTALLING APPROVED UPLIFTFRAMING CONNECTORS TO PROVIDE ACONTINUOUS LOAD PATH FROM THETOP OF THE WALL TO THE FOUNDATIONOR TO A POINT WHERE THE UPLIFTFORCE IS 100 PLF OR LESS. THE NETUPLIFT VALUE SHALL BE ASDETERMINED BY ONE OF THEFOLLOWING:a. THE BASIC WIND SPEED DOES NOTEXCEED 115 MPH, THE WINDEXPOSURE CATEGORY IS B, THEROOF PITCH IS 5:12 OR GREATER,AND THE ROOF SPAN IS 32' OR LESS(OR)b. THE NET UPLIFT VALUE AT THE TOPOF A WALL DOES NOT EXCEED 100PLF. THE NET UPLIFT VALUE SHALLBE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCEWITH SECTION R802.11 AND SHALLBE PERMITTED TO BE REDUCED BY60 PLF FOR EACH FULL WALLABOVE.2. WHERE THE UPLIFT FORCE DOES NOTEXCEED 200 POUNDS, RAFTERS ANDTRUSSES SPACED NOT MORE THAN 24INCHES ON CENTER SHALL BEPERMITTED TO BE ATTACHED TO THEIRSUPPORTING WALL ASSEMBLIES INACCORDANCE WITH TABLE R602.3(1)a.: MINIMUM (3) 16d BOXNAILS OR (3) 10d COMMON NAILS. (2)TOE NAILS ON ONE SIDE AND (1)TOE NAIL ON OPPOSITE SIDE OFEACH RAFTER OR TRUSS. (MANUF.METAL CONNECTOR MAY BESUBSTITUTED, VERIFY W/ MANUF.DETAILS).b.:CONNECTION OF WOOD PANEL TOSTUDS SHALL BE MIN. 6d COMMONNAILS, 6" O.C. AT EDGES & 12" O.C.AT FIELD OF WOOD PANEL.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25S21ST FLOORWALL BRACINGPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 191 of 194 : 800 LBS CAPACITY FASTENED TO THE EDGE OF THE BRACED WALL PANEL CLOSEST TO THE CORNER AND TO THE FOUNDATION OR FLOOR FRAMING BELOWSOLID BLOCKING BETWEENRAFTERSATTACHED TO TOP PLATESWITH 8d@ 6" O.C. ALONG LENGTH OFBRACEDWALL PANEL (ONLY REQ. @BRACEDWALL PANEL LOCATIONS)ROOF SYSTEM2" MAX OPENAREA BETWEENBLOCKING &ROOF DECKINGMAXIMUM HEEL HEIGHTTO BE 15.25" OR SHORTERBRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTIONTO PERPENDICULAR ROOF SYSTEM2X BLOCKING PLACEDHORIZONTALLY, ATTOP PLATEROOF SYSTEM2" MAX OPENAREA BETWEENBLOCKING &ROOF DECKINGMAXIMUM HEEL HEIGHTTO BE 48" OR SHORTER,WHEN OVER 48" USEWALL FRAMING NOTATIONSBRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTIONTO PERPENDICULAR ROOF SYSTEM(WHEN OVER 15.25")2X BLOCKING VERTICALLYATTACHED BETWEEN ROOFSYSTEM (TRUSSES)2X BLOCKING PLACEDHORIZONTALLY, BETWEENROOF SYSTEM (TRUSSES)EXTEND SHEATHING UPBETWEEN ROOF SYSTEM(TRUSSES), NAIL TOBLOCKING AS NOTEDUSE 8d NAILS, SPACED 6" O.C.FOR CONNECTION OFBLOCKINGTO ADJACENT FRAMING &SHEATHINGBRACED WALL2X RIM BOARDPER TRUSS MANUF.TRUSS SYSTEMMIN. 8d @ 6" O.C.ALONG BRACED WALLPANEL LOCATION(3)-16d @ 16" O.C.ALONG BRACED WALLPANEL LOCATION2X RIM BOARDPER TRUSS MANUF.SILL PLATE W/ANCHOR PER PLANSCONC. FOUND. WALLMIN. 2X4 HORIZONTAL BLOCKING PLACED@ TOP & BOTTOM OF FLOOR SYSTEM W/MIN. 2X4 VERTICAL BLOCKING BETWEENFLOOR SYSTEM W/ MIN. 3/8" OSB ORPLYWOOD NAILED TO BLOCKING W/ MIN.8d @ 6" O.C.(NOTE: @ BRACED WALL LOCATIONSONLY)NAIL BLOCKING INTO TOPPLATE W/MIN. 8d @ 6" O.C. ALONGBRACEDWALL PANEL LOCATIONSMIN. 2X4 HORIZONTAL BLOCKING PLACED@ TOP & BOTTOM OF FLOOR SYSTEM W/MIN. 2X4 VERTICAL BLOCKING BETWEENFLOOR SYSTEM W/ MIN. 3/8" OSB ORPLYWOOD NAILED TO BLOCKING W/ MIN.8d @ 6" O.C.(NOTE: @ BRACED WALL LOCATIONSONLY)NAIL BLOCKING INTO BOTTOMPLATE W/MIN. (3)-16d @ 16" O.C. ALONGBRACEDWALL PANEL LOCATIONSBRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTIONWHEN PERPENDICULAR TO FLOOR/CEILING FRAMINGBRACED WALLTRUSS SYSTEMMIN. 8d @ 6" O.C.ALONG BRACED WALLPANEL LOCATION(3)-16d @ 16" O.C.ALONG BRACED WALLPANEL LOCATIONTRUSS SYSTEMSILL PLATE W/ANCHOR PER PLANSCONC. FOUND. WALLMIN. (2)2X4 HORIZONTAL BLOCKINGPLACED @ TOP & BOTTOM OF FLOORSYSTEM W/ MIN. 2X4 VERTICAL BLOCKINGBETWEEN FLOOR SYSTEM W/ MIN. 3/8"OSB OR PLYWOOD NAILED TO ALLBLOCKING W/ MIN. 8d @ 6" O.C.(NOTE: @ BRACED WALL LOCATIONSONLY)TOE-NAIL BLOCKING INTO TOPPLATE W/MIN. 8d @ 6" O.C. ALONGBRACEDWALL PANEL LOCATIONSNAIL BLOCKING INTO BOTTOMPLATE W/MIN. (3)-16d @ 16" O.C. ALONGBRACEDWALL PANEL LOCATIONSBRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTIONWHEN PARALLEL TO FLOOR/CEILING FRAMINGNAIL BLOCKING INTO TOP &BOTTOM OF ADJACENTTRUSS SYSTEM AS SHOWN W/MIN. (3)-16d @ EACHCONNECTIONMIN. (2)2X4 HORIZONTAL BLOCKINGPLACED @ TOP & BOTTOM OF FLOORSYSTEM W/ MIN. 2X4 VERTICAL BLOCKINGBETWEEN FLOOR SYSTEM W/ MIN. 3/8"OSB OR PLYWOOD NAILED TO ALLBLOCKING W/ MIN. 8d @ 6" O.C.(NOTE: @ BRACED WALL LOCATIONSONLY)NAIL BLOCKING INTO TOP &BOTTOM OF ADJACENTTRUSS SYSTEM AS SHOWN W/MIN. (3)-16d @ EACHCONNECTION12' MAX. TOTAL WALL HEIGHT10' MAX. HEIGHTFASTEN SHEATHING TO HEADER WITH 8D COMMON ORGALVANIZED BOX NAIL IN 3" GRID PATTERN AS SHOWNHEADER TO JACK-STUD STRAP PER TABLER602.10.6.4 ON BOTH SIDES OF OPENINGOPPOSITE SIDE OF SHEATHINGMIN. DOUBLE 2x4 FRAMING COVERED WITH MIN. 3/8"THICK WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING WITH8D COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX NAILS AT 3" O.C. INALL FRAMING (STUD, BLOCKING, AND SILLS) TYP.MIN. LENGTH OF PANEL PER TABLE R602.10.5MIN. (2) 12" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTSINSTALLED PER R403.1.6 WITH 2"x2"x316"PLATE WASHERTENSION STRAPPER TABLE602.10.6.4 (ONOPPOSITE SIDEOF SHEATHING)BRACED WALL LINECONTINUOUSLYSHEATHED WITHWOOD STRUCTURALPANELSIF NEEDED PANELSPLICE EDGESSHALL OCCUR ANDBE ATTACHED TOCOMMON BLOCKINGWITHIN 24" OF WALLMIN-HEIGHT. ONEROW OF 3" NAILINGIS REQUIRED INEACH PANEL EDGE.TYPICAL PORTALFRAMECONSTRUCTIONMIN. DOUBLE 2x4POST (KING ANDJACK STUD).NUMBER OF JACKSTUDS PERTABLES R502.5(1)& (2).ANCHOR BOLTSPER SECTIONR403.1.6OVER CONCRETE OR MASONRY BLOCK FOUNDATIONFASTEN TO PLATE TO HEADERWITH TWO ROWS OF 16DSINKER NAILS AT 3" O.C. TYP.MIN. 716" WOOD STRUCTURALPANEL SHEATHINGWOOD STRUCTURALPANELSHEATHING TO TOPOF BAND OR RIMJOISTNAIL SOLEPLATE TOJOIST PERTABLER602.3(1)WOOD STRUCTURALPANELSHEATHING TO TOPOF BAND OR RIMJOISTNAIL SOLEPLATE TOJOIST PERTABLER602.3(1)WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHINGOVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOISTWOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHINGOVER APPROVED BAND OR RIM JOISTOVER RAISED WOOD FLOOR - FRAMING ANCHOR OPTION(WHEN PORTAL SHEATHING DOES NOT LAP OVER BAND OR RIM JOIST)OVER RAISED WOOD FLOOR - OVERLAP OPTION(WHEN PORTAL SHEATHING LAPS OVER BAND OR RIM BOARD)(2) FRAMINGANCHORS APPLIEDACROSS SHEATHINGJOINT WITH ACAPACITY OF 670 LBSIN THE HORIZONTALAND VERTICALDIRECTIONSATTACHED SHEATHINGTO BAND OR RIM JOISTWITH 8D COMMONNAILS AT 3" O.C. TOPAND BOTTOMAPPROVEDBAND ORRIM JOISTNAIL SOLEPLATE TOJOIST PERTABLER602.3(1)APPROVEDBAND ORRIM JOISTNAIL SOLEPLATE TOJOIST PERTABLER602.3(1)FIGURE BRACED WALL PANEL 1METHOD CS-PF-CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED PORTAL FRAME PANEL CONSTRUCTIONMIN. OVERLAP 9-1/4"MIN. 3"x11 14" NET HEADER, STEEL HEADER PROHIBITEDFOR SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm.EXTENT OF HEADER WITH DOUBLE PORTAL FRAMES (TWO BRACED WALL PANELS)EXTENT OF HEADER WITH SINGLE PORTAL FRAME (ONE BRACED WALL PANEL)2' - 18' FINISHED WIDTH OF OPENING FOR SINGLE OR DOUBLE PORTALPONY WALL HEIGHT12' MAX. TOTAL WALL HEIGHT10' MAX. HEIGHTFASTEN SHEATHING TO HEADER WITH 8D COMMON ORGALVANIZED BOX NAIL IN 3" GRID PATTERN AS SHOWNHEADER TO JACK-STUD STRAP PER TABLER602.10.6.4 ON BOTH SIDES OF OPENINGOPPOSITE SIDE OF SHEATHINGMIN. DOUBLE 2x4 FRAMING COVERED WITH MIN. 3/8"THICK WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING WITH8D COMMON OR GALVANIZED BOX NAILS AT 3" O.C. INALL FRAMING (STUD, BLOCKING, AND SILLS) TYP.MIN. LENGTH OF PANEL PER TABLE R602.10.5MIN. (2) 3500LB STRAP-TYPEHOLD-DOWNS (EMBEDDED INTOCONCRETE AND NAILED INTO FRAMING)TENSION STRAPPER TABLE602.10.6.4 (ONOPPOSITE SIDEOF SHEATHING)IF NEEDED PANELSPLICE EDGESSHALL OCCUR ANDBE ATTACHED TOCOMMON BLOCKINGWITHIN 24" OF WALLMIN-HEIGHT. ONEROW OF 3" NAILINGIS REQUIRED INEACH PANEL EDGE.TYPICAL PORTALFRAMECONSTRUCTIONMIN. DOUBLE 2x4POST (KING ANDJACK STUD).NUMBER OF JACKSTUDS PERTABLES R502.5(1)& (2).MIN. 1000LBHOLD-DOWNDEVICE(EMBEDDED INTOCONCRETE ANDNAILED INTOFRAMING).FASTEN TO PLATE TO HEADERWITH TWO ROWS OF 16DSINKER NAILS AT 3" O.C. TYP.MIN. 3/8" WOOD STRUCTURALPANEL SHEATHINGEXTENT OF HEADER WITH DOUBLE PORTAL FRAMES (TWO BRACED WALL PANELS)EXTENT OF HEADER WITH SINGLE PORTAL FRAME (ONE BRACED WALL PANEL)2' - 18' FINISHED WIDTH OF OPENING FOR SINGLE OR DOUBLE PORTALPONY WALL HEIGHTMIN. FOOTING SIZE UNDER OPENING IS 12" X 12". ATURNED-DOWN SLAB SHALL BE PERMITTED AT DOOROPENING.MIN. (1) 5/8" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLED PERR403.1.6 - WITH 2"X2"X 3/16" PLATE WASHER.FIGURE BRACED WALL PANEL 2METHOD PFH-PORTAL FRAME PANEL WITH HOLD-DOWNSMIN. REINFORCING OF FOUNDATION, ONE #4 BAR TOP ANDBOTTOM OF FOOTING. LAP BARS 15" MINIMUM.CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED BRACEDWALL LINEHOLD-DOWNDEVICEFIRST BRACED WALL PANEL58'-0"39'-9"SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2057 FINISHED SQUARE FEET SECOND FLOOR WALL BRACING PLAN14'-0"6'-0"4'-0"6'-0"3'-8"5'-5 1/2"4'-0"4'-0"3'-6"4'-0"2'-10 1/2"3'-10 1/2"4'-0"4'-0"PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips7-25-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:9−5−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25GIRDERS & ROOF PITCH UPDATED PER TRUSS PLANS7-25-25ROOF PITCH CHANGED & FLOOR PLANS ADJUSTED9-4-25S32ND FLOORWALL BRACING& DETAILSSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 192 of 194 Packet Addendum - Public Comments received as of 9/25/25 Page 193 of 194 Redford Law PA 7201 Ohms Lane, Suite 210 Edina, MN 55439 olson-law.com Shaun Redford shaunr@olson-law.com 952.224.3644 ext.2 September 25, 2025 VIA EMAIL Mendota Heights City Council Mendota Heights Planning Commission Mendota Heights, MN Re: CUP Application for 1867 Hunter Lane, Mendota Heights Case No. 2025-17 Our File No.: 15434 Dear Council Members and Commissioners: I am legal counsel for Joshua and Haley Metellus, owners of 1867 Hunter Lane, Mendota Heights (the “Property”). Josh and Haley are incredibly excited to be part of the Mendota Heights community. Josh and Haley closed on the purchase of the Property on August 18, 2025 and expected that construction of their home by M & M Home Contractors (“M & M”) would begin shortly after closing. However, we recently learned that the City recently revised certain code requirements regarding the height of homes that directly affected their construction plans and has caused a delay in construction. M & M revised the plans and promptly submitted an application for a CUP. We appreciate the hard work of City Staff in reviewing and recommending approval of the CUP application. It’s my understanding that there is no objection to the CUP from neighbors or anyone else. Accordingly, on behalf of Josh and Haley, I respectfully request that the Planning Commission and the City Council promptly approve the requested CUP with only the four numbered conditions identified in the Staff Report. Sincerely yours, Shaun Redford SDR/nrm Cc: Clients Packet Addendum - Public Comments received as of 9/25/25 Page 194 of 194