Loading...
09 02 2025 City Council Agenda Packet CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA September 2, 2025 at 6:00 PM Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of the Agenda The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline. 5. Public Comments - for items not on the agenda Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up. 6. Consent Agenda Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item, the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business. a. Approve Minutes from the August 13, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting b. Approve Minutes from the August 19, 2025, City Council Meeting c. Approve Minutes from the August 19, 2025, City Council Work Session Meeting d. Acknowledge the Minutes of the July 22, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting e. Authorize Signer for Solid Waste Abatement Grant from Dakota County f. Accept Parks and Recreation Commissioner Resignation and Authorize the Advertisement of the Commission Opening g. Approve the Promotion of James Walrath from Police Cadet to Police Officer Page 1 of 109 h.Authorize Installation of Garage Door at Public Works Facility i.Approve Resolution 2025-54 to Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising Project j.Approve Resolution 2025-55 to Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project k.Approve Reimbursement for Storm Sewer Relocation at 1770 Dodd Road l.Adopt Resolution 2025-53 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $2,820,000 in General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A m.Approve July 2025 Treasurer's Report n.Approve Claims List 7.Presentations 8.Public Hearings 9.New and Unfinished Business a.Traffic Revision at 750 Main Street b.Resolution 2025-56 Supporting Removal of the Dorset Road Connection to Delaware Avenue and Construction of a Cul-De-Sac Along Dorset Road c.Resolution 2025-57 Approving a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane (Planning Case 2025-12) 10.Community / City Administrator Announcements 11.City Council Comments 12.Adjourn Next Meeting September 16, 2025 at 6:00PM Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals with disabilities upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov. Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on NDC4/Town Square Television Cable Channel 18/HD798 and online at TownSquare.TV/Webstreaming Page 2 of 109 August 13, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1 6.a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session Tuesday, August 13, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Mazzitello and Paper were in attendance. Councilor Maczko was absent. Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie, Community Development Manager Sarah Madden, Park and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer. FY 2026 PROPOSED BUDGET REVIEW City Administrator Jacobson began with a review of the Administration budget, noting a 6.61% increase in the budget from 2025. The increase reflects investments in staff and core operations. Councilor Lorberbaum asked about city hall rent. Finance Director Schabacker responded that it was for the various departments to pay into the city hall fund to help cover the costs of utilities, maintenance, etc., for city hall. Mayor Levine asked about the auditor costs and whether it was time to go out for an RFP. Finance Director Schabacker responded that the increase for auditing services included the cost for the actuarial company for one of the footnotes of the audit. She added that it would be up to the council if an RFP was requested. Mayor Levine asked about the salary reclassifications for administration. City Administrator Jacobson responded that there were two positions in administration that were proposed to be reclassified. City Administrator Jacobson noted the IT budget is down from 2025. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson added that some projects were deferred for 2026, and hardware upgrades occur on a cyclical schedule. Page 3 of 109 August 13, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2 Councilor Lorberbaum asked when new computers were purchased. Assistant City Administrator Torkelson responded that computers are on a five-year replacement schedule. City Administrator Jacobson stated that the proposed City Hall budget is down nearly 19%, with no major changes to the budget for 2026. City Administrator Jacobson reported a 15.31% proposed increase in the Community Development budget, including funds for the 2025 Comprehensive Plan update and increased code enforcement prosecutions. Community Development Manager Madden noted the Comp Plan update will take at least three years. Councilor Paper asked about a consultant, and Community Development Manager Madden said that it will be decided in 2026. Councilor Paper asked about the cost of the large packets produced that had gone out recently and if the costs were recovered with application fees or through the required escrow. Community Development Manager Madden stated that the fees will be revisited when reviewing the fee schedule. City Administrator Jacobson stated that Council could move towards electronic packets as part of an efficiency and sustainability effort. Councilor Mazzitello offered to switch to electronic packets when staff were ready to move forward. City Administrator Jacobson stated that the proposed building official budget had a minimal increase and covered contracted inspection services through Inspectron. Councilor Mazzitello asked how the contracted inspection services were going. Community Development Manager Madden responded that she has had very few complaints. City Administrator Jacobson stated that Engineering is proposing a 5.41% increase and highlighted the request for asset management software. Assistant City Engineer Ritchie provided background on the proposed asset management software, noting that the system would be utilized by multiple departments. Public Works Director Ruzek reported on the budget request to replace a 2013 F-150 within the Engineering Department. City Administrator Jacobson stated that the Streets Department has a small increase of 2.3% and noted that the salt budget has decreased. City Administrator Jacobson stated that there are a number of capital requests coming from the Streets, Parks and Utility departments. Public Works Director Ruzek reviewed public works budget requests, including the replacement of the city’s oversized wheel loader, a new truck- mounted message board, replacement of the existing aprons and bollards at the public works building, and installation of a building access control system at the public works building. Public Works Director Ruzek reviewed the utility fund, noting that the software support line item is for the SCDA system that had been added to all the lift stations. Page 4 of 109 August 13, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3 Councilor Mazzitello asked for the balance of the utility fund. Finance Director Schabacker responded that there was $2.2 million as of December 31, 2024. City Administrator Jacobson reported a proposed 3.29% increase to the stormwater utility fund, aiming to improve one pond per year. Public Works Director Ruzek added that a consultant inspected 60 ponds this year, a task done every five years. Public Works Director Ruzek reviewed the streetlight maintenance budget, noting it covers the industrial park and is charged back to the districts. The budget is down 21.51% due to pole replacements and LED conversions. Finance Director Schabacker reported the fund balance is just under $75,000. City Administrator Jacobson stated that the parks budget was proposed to increase 1.52%. Capital requests were reviewed. City Administrator Jacobson reviewed Special Parks Fund budget requests. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence reported that the Parks Commission reviewed capital projects. Their top priorities were adding water to the dog park and tot lot. After discussion, it was the consensus not to add water to either. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence reviewed the remaining budget requests, including the replacement of hockey boards at Wentworth Park, expansion of the Wentworth basketball court, Valley Park playground replacement and a refresh of the Valley Park picnic shelter. Staff and council discussed the possibility of applying for a MN DNR matching grant to offset some of the costs of these projects. Mayor Levine asked if Dakota County could help fund Valley Park improvements. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence said funding would require designating the park as a trailhead, which involves meeting certain conditions. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence discussed the Commission’s recommendation to add a bocce ball court to the city’s park system. Councilor Mazzitello asked if it would be one or two courts. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence stated that one or two courts were being considered and noted that funds could be used from the Special Parks Fund to fund the bocce ball court(s). Assistant City Administrator Torkelson stated that Park AEDs are a budget request coming from the Employee Safety Committee. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence described how the park AEDs would work. City Administrator Jacobson stated the AEDs are recommended for Wentworth Park, Friendly Hills Park, Kensington Park, and Mendakota Park. She stated she had discussed with the Page 5 of 109 August 13, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 4 Mendota Heights Community Foundation if they would consider funding the park AEDs. Councilor Lorberbaum reported they would be interested but did not have the funds currently. City Administrator Jacobson stated that there is a budget request for the Oheyawahe Interpretive Plan – Phase IV. It is a $10,000 request as part of the larger Oheyawahe project. City Administrator Jacobson stated that a John Deere Gator was requested by the Parks Department, and it would be a new piece of equipment. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that it is a versatile piece of equipment. It is proposed to have a plow attached to assist in plowing snow. It could also be outfitted with a tracked machine in the winter to groom the trails for cross country skiing at the Par 3. City Administrator Jacobson stated that the Recreation budget is proposed to increase just under 10%. The increase reflects the expansion of existing offerings. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence stated that nature-based programming is being added to the recreation budget. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence stated that there is about a $50,000 operating surplus at the Par 3. She highlighted that rounds played this year are up, as well as camp attendance and concessions. She relayed that the tee time software is working great. City Administrator Jacobson stated that there is a proposed 6.53% increase to the budget for the Par 3. Mayor Levine asked for the fund balance of the Par 3. Finance Director Schabacker responded that at the end of last year it was $158,000. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence discussed a request to purchase a standby generator for the golf course maintenance garage. Mayor Levine asked about the irrigation system. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence stated that it is working well. In a couple of years, the underground piping will need to be replaced at an estimated cost of $700,000. City Administrator Jacobson reviewed the Recycling budget and its proposed changes. Parks and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Lawrence stated that the city is working through a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of West St. Paul, South Saint Paul, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, and Sunfish Lake for recycling services. Staff propose increasing the hours to 20 hours a week for the Recycling Coordinator. The impact on the budget is about $5,000. It was the consensus to move forward with the request. City Administrator Jacobson reported that Natural Resources has its own budget this year, with a proposed 6.78% increase. Key projects include a climate action and resilience plan and landscape ordinance. Page 6 of 109 August 13, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 5 Councilor Mazzitello asked how the franchise fees collected for natural resources are incorporated into the budget. Finance Director responded that they are incorporated into the general fund. Mayor Levine asked about the cell tower revenue. Finance Director replied that St. Paul Water Regional Water Services and the city split the funds received from the cell tower revenues. Councilor Paper left the work session meeting. Councilor Mazzitello asked about the Community Development budget request stating there is a request for the 2025 Comprehensive Plan and asked if that was included in the budget figures. Finance Director Schabacker replied that included in the budget numbers were the Minnesota Paid Family Leave expense, the 2025 Comprehensive Plan expense, and the Recycling Coordinator position expense. Mayor Levine asked about the timeline for approving the budget. City Administrator Jacobson explained there is one more work session scheduled for further budget discussion with the preliminary budget to be approved at the September 16, 2025, City Council meeting. It was the consensus to hold one more work session on September 3 at 4:00 pm. City Administrator Jacobson reviewed the entire list of budget requests and confirmed the council’s direction for inclusion in the 2026 preliminary budget. After discussion regarding the 2026 levy, Finance Director Schabacker stated the preliminary levy showed a 3.44% increase. Councilor Mazzitello stated this number showed fiscal responsibility. Finance Director Schabacker stated the proposed levy tax rate would be 38.362. The median home of $551,000 in 2026 will see approximately $78.62 in an annual increase with the proposed budget. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Mazzitello made a motion to adjourn the work session, and the motion was seconded by Councilor Lorberbaum. Motion carried 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:04 p.m. _________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 7 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum and Paper were also present. Councilors Mazzitello and Maczko were absent. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Lorberbaum moved adoption of the agenda. Councilor Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 PRESENTATIONS A)SWEARING IN CEREMONY FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIREFIGHTERS Fire Chief Dan Johnson commented on the process that firefighters complete, including the in-house fire academy, all certifications, and their 12-month probationary period, as well as continued training. Training Captain Becky Johnson introduced new firefighters Brandon Rebhan, Joe Fabiano and their guests who attended the meeting. They were then sworn in. B)RECOGNITION AND PRESENTATION OF LIFE-SAVING AWARD Police Captain Wayne Wegener provided information on a situation that took place on June 2nd when the department received a call related to a person in crisis attempting to jump from the Mendota bridge. Officers responded and, with the help of others, were able to rescue the individual and bring them to safety. The Officers and residents who responded were presented with Life-Saving Awards. PUBLIC COMMENTS No one from the public wished to be heard. Page 8 of 109 6.b August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 3 CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilor Paper moved approval of the consent agenda as presented. a.Approval of August 6, 2025, City Council Minutes b.Approval of August 6, 2025, Council Work Session Minutes c.Acknowledge the June Par 3 Financial Report d.Approve the 2025-2026 Seasonal Compensation Pay Matrix e.Approve Resolution 2025-51 for a Joint Powers Agreement with the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Financial Crimes Task Force f.Approve Resolution 2025-52 for a Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for Social Services Embedded Social Worker g.Award a Professional Services Contract for the Cherry Hill Pond Improvements h.Approve 2025 June Treasurer’s Report i.Approval of Claims List Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 PUBLIC HEARING No items scheduled. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A) METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISTRICT 15 REPRESENTATIVE VICTOR OBISAKIN INTRODUCTION Victor Obisakin, the Metropolitan Council representative for District 15, introduced himself and provided information on his committee assignments and the Metropolitan Council. He noted that he plans to meet with mayors, commissioners, City development staff and will maintain open lines of communication to bring Metropolitan Council resources to the communities he serves. The Council welcomed Victor Obisakin and looked forward to working with him. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming community events and activities. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilor Lorberbaum thanked all heroes who were recognized tonight for saving a life. She also congratulated and thanked the two new firefighters and their families for their commitment to the Page 9 of 109 August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 3 community. She commented on Heights Fest, which included wonderful events. She commented that a number of people attended the most recent Coffee with the Council. Councilor Paper commented that Mendota Heights has amazing people in its community, which is part of what makes the city great. He stated that he is eager to work with Mr. Obisakin and looks forward to working with him. Mayor Levine thanked the two new firefighters, recognizing their commitment to the community. She also recognized the four Officers and two community members who stepped in when someone needed help. She thanked City staff for their work on Heights Fest, noting that the food truck fest was her favorite event. She hoped to see residents at the concert in the park the following night, which will feature a local group from Mendota Heights. She commented that she received a letter from the League of Minnesota Cities, stating that Senator Matt Klein was recognized as a 2025 Legislator of Distinction. Councilor Lorberbaum noted that typically the City sponsors the concerts in the park, but this week the event is sponsored by the Mendota Heights Community Foundation and thanked the organization. ADJOURN Councilor Paper moved to adjourn. Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 6:37 p.m. ____________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Nancy Bauer City Clerk Page 10 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 1 6.c CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:30 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum and Paper were in attendance. Councilors Maczko and Mazzitello were absent. Others present included: City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Community Development Manager Sarah Madden, Police Captain Wayne Wegener, Park and Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, and City Clerk Nancy Bauer. Also in attendance was Scott Buell of Buell Consulting. CELL TOWER ANTENNA PROPOSAL – WENTWORTH PARK Public Works Director Ruzek reported that the city was approached by a representative from a third-party consultant to install a new cellular antenna at Wentworth Park. Buell Consulting later joined in to work on the proposal. The consultants represent Vertical Bridge, which is a partner of Verizon Wireless, and they construct cellular tower antennas and then lease the space back to Verizon Wireless. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that the last cell tower antenna application the city received was in 2007 for Wentworth Park and City Hall. The applicant was T-Mobile, and the application was withdrawn due to public engagement during the process. Public Works Director Ruzek reviewed the map that was included in the packet, showing two possible locations at Wentworth Park for a proposed cell tower antenna. The impacts on park activity, potential rent and terms of a lease agreement were highlighted. S. Buell stated he is with Buell Consulting, which has been in business since 1991 and is local to the area, and then explained his company’s role in locating and negotiating the installation of cellular towers. Page 11 of 109 August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 2 Mayor Levine asked how cellular service works. S. Buell explained that devices connect through cell tower antennas and that coverage can be affected by obstacles and antenna placement. Mayor Levine asked about cell phone connections. S. Buell reported that voice data is also digital data and uses similar frequencies. For digital voice, you do need a constant connection. Public Works Director Ruzek explained that cell tower antennas require fiber optic lines underground to work. He also noted that the shape of the land, such as valleys like near Valley Park, can affect cell coverage. Director Ruzek asked if coverage maps were available. S. Buell said coverage maps are considered proprietary information. He added that open-source data online may show coverage gaps. Mayor Levine asked what area would benefit from the new antenna. S. Buell said it would mainly serve the north end of the city and relieve pressure on nearby overused towers. Councilor Lorberbaum said she spoke with a resident in the Avenues and asked if that resident would notice an improvement. Director Ruzek responded that the new antenna would make a major improvement. Councilor Lorberbaum asked if the property owners were aware of this discussion. Public Works Director Ruzek stated not directly since a formal proposal had not been received. Councilor Lorberbaum asked how tall the cell tower antenna could be. S. Buell responded as tall as would be allowed. Mayor Levine asked how tall the existing trees were by the proposed sites. Public Works Director Ruzek responded 60 to 80 feet tall. Councilor Lorberbaum asked if other consultants were being considered. Director Ruzek said no and noted that a cell tower antenna is not critical to providers’ networks. Councilor Paper thanked S. Buell and said the project addresses a major coverage gap in the north end. He noted concerns from Avenues residents about cell service and stated the antenna will be a significant benefit for the community. He emphasized that the antenna is needed more by the community than by the cell companies and described the project as a major benefit for the city. Councilor Paper asked about moving the proposed antenna closer to the Williams property and what space is needed for installation. S. Buell said the full 75x75 feet may not be required but could be needed during construction. Councilor Paper asked about an estimated timeline for the project. S. Buell stated that if the project goes as planned, the Verizon equipment would be installed in early 2027. Page 12 of 109 August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 3 Councilor Paper asked what was needed to complete the project. S. Buell stated the first step would be to have a fully negotiated lease agreement. Councilor Paper asked what could stop the project. S. Buell replied that it could be stopped if a lease agreement could not be negotiated. Councilor Paper asked when other carriers would be approached to locate on the cell tower antenna. S. Buell stated that it usually happens when the site is ready for construction and explained how that would work. Councilor Paper asked if small cell tower antennas would be placed on the proposed cell tower antenna. S. Buell stated he did not think they would be needed. Councilor Paper asked if the proposed antenna would help with coverage in Valley Park. S. Buell stated he did not know if it would. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that a post coverage map would be beneficial. Mayor Levine stated that this is a Council priority. City Administrator Jacobson asked if the difference between a monopole and a monopine pole could be described. Images were shown of the different types of poles. S. Buell described the differences between the two types of poles and offered locations where they could be seen nearby. He also stated that a monopine pole is more expensive to construct. The different pole types were discussed along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Mayor Levine asked if Wentworth Park was the best spot to install a new cell tower antenna. S. Buell stated that after studying the area, it was determined to be the best spot and fit. It would be located on city property, on a large parcel, and it would not be too close to any owner’s property lines. Mayor Levine stated that it seemed to be the consensus to move forward in good faith and to prepare for the next step. City Administrator Jacobson asked about rent, pole type, and the lease. S. Buell explained the lease would be with Vertical Bridge (Towers LLC), the proposed tower owner, with Verizon as the first tenant paying rent and encouraging others to join. It was discussed what type of pole was preferred. It was the consensus to use a monopole, but more discussion was needed as two council members were absent. Councilor Paper asked if notices sent to residents regarding this issue could be extended beyond the 350 feet. Public Works Director Ruzek stated that it could and has been done in the past. Councilor Paper asked if notices set at 1250 feet would reach First Avenue. Different boundary lines were shown on a map to show the intended recipients of the notices. Page 13 of 109 August 19, 2025, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Page - 4 S. Buell explained the initial terms of the agreement and stated that carriers prefer lower annual rent increases, around 1.5%, as higher rates over time make sites harder to sustain. Councilor Paper asked if 2% was unrealistic for an annual increase. S. Buell responded that it was not unrealistic. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Paper made a motion to adjourn the work session, and the motion was seconded by Councilor Lorberbaum. Motion carried 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:37 p.m. _________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 14 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 8 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 22, 2025 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, July 22, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Commissioners Patrick Corbett, Cindy Johnson, Brian Udell, Jason Stone, and Jeff Nath. Those absent: Steve Goldade. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as submitted. Approval of June 24, 2025 Minutes COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 2025. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Hearings A) PLANNING CASE 2025-11 POT MAMA’S MSO LLC, 1155 CENTRE POINTE DRIVE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Pot Mama’s MSO LLC has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a cannabis retailer location, located in the B-1 General Business zoning district at 1155 Centre Pointe Drive. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson asked if there is a maximum size for retail space in B-1. Page 15 of 109 6.d July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 8 Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that there is a maximum size for accessory retail use within the industrial zone, but there is no maximum in the general business district. Commissioner Johnson asked if there would be consumption on site, noting the reference to a social boutique within the Commission packet. Commissioner Corbett commented that a retail use would not allow consumption on site. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden confirmed that this would only be retail sales. She explained that the social aspect would be through engagement and community building, which is found within the business plan. She explained that the event license would be a separate process through the State. She commented that an event within the retail space would be allowed and would be different. She explained that the business plan mentioned things like women’s groups as an example of social events. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Andrew Katz, 1960 Walsh Lane, asked if any data was provided related to whether there would be increased police activity or police calls from this type of business. Chair Field commented that there was no information of that type within the staff report. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the level of data was not provided as part of the application. She stated that the majority of security requirements and review will be done through the State license review through the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM). She reviewed the role of the City in reviewing this type of license. Vicky Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, commented that she has conflicting feelings as she believes there are benefits to regulation that would allow this type of business, but this also brings to mind a stereotypical image of potential customers. She stated that Mendota Heights is a family-oriented community, and she would not want to see this business bringing in unwanted customers from other communities. She asked the Commission to ensure that the request is well vetted before allowing the business into the community. Scott Van, 1870 Hunter Lane, commented that he was not aware that this type of business was allowed in Mendota Heights and believed that the applicant should be present. Commissioner Corbett stated that there is no subjectivity to this decision as the State regulations cannot be changed. He stated that the application complies with all regulations. Chair Field commented that this would be the only cannabis retailer allowed. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden confirmed that if the licensee fully completes the process, this would be the only retail business allowed in Mendota Heights. She explained the Page 16 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 8 State law related to this type of business and the regulations the City was able to enact. She commented that the City will be involved in compliance checks. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 1155 CENTRE POINTE DRIVE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS-OF-FACT AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.ALL PARKING FOR THE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING MUST BE ACCOMMODATED ON SITE. ANY INDICATION THAT THE SITE IS UNDER PARKED MAY RESULT IN REQUIRED AMENDMENTS TO THE SITE PLAN AND/OR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 2.CANNABIS BUSINESSES ARE LIMITED TO RETAIL SALE OF CANNABIS, CANNABIS FLOWER, CANNABIS PRODUCTS, LOWER-POTENCY HEMP EDIBLES, OR HEMP-DERIVED CONSUMER PRODUCTS BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 A.M AND 10:00 P.M. ON MONDAY-SATURDAY; AND BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 A.M. AND 9:00 P.M. ON SUNDAYS. 3.ANY NEW REMODELING OR INTERIOR WORK (INCLUDING BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING/COOLING, AND OTHER RELATED WORK MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR STANDARD BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING STARTED. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its August 6, 2025, meeting. B)PLANNING CASE 2025-12 M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1867 HUNTER LANE – MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA (MRCCA) PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the applicant and owner’s representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single- family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. Page 17 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 8 Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no written comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Chair Field asked about the location of the prior home that was demolished. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden identified the location of the previous home, noting that the prior home was a different style of home. She commented that the setback of the prior home is generally consistent with the proposal. Commissioner Johnson commented that it seems that the new home would be closer to the bluff than the previous home, and similar to the home at 1875 Hunter. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden confirmed that the new home would be slightly more setback and generally centrally located on the lot. Chair Field noted that the applicant is not present. He stated that the Commission could open the public hearing or consider other action. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the public hearing was noticed for tonight. She stated that if the Commission desires to table the request, she would still ask them to open the public hearing tonight. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Chair Field cautioned that the applicant is not present, and their input may change the input of public speakers. He noted that members of the public are only allowed to speak once, and therefore members of the public may want to hold their input for a time when the applicant is present. Commissioner Corbett stated that members of the public can speak tonight, and if they want to speak again at the next meeting, they could still do that. Commissioner Johnson stated that residents chose to attend tonight, and they should be allowed to speak again at the next meeting if this item is tabled. Commissioner Stone agreed that members of the public who chose to attend tonight should speak. John and Theresa Cosgriff, 1875 Hunter Lane, commented that they are supportive of the build and are looking forward to having neighbors. Page 18 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 8 Andrew Katz, 1960 Walsh Lane, commented on the trees and vegetation that exist on the west end of the lot. He commented that there is a small spring that runs down through the area identified in yellow. He wondered if there was information available relating to tree removal and whether that could include a tree inventory. He asked if solar panels would be planned for the home and whether that would include utility work to the street. Commissioner Corbett confirmed that they would be leaving the public hearing open as the applicant is not here to address questions. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, TO TABLE CASE #2025-12 AS THERE ARE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT IS NOT PRESENT. Further discussion: Chair Field asked that staff advise the applicant about the concern that was raised relating to trees and landscaping. Commissioner Johnson commented that she feels that this application is incomplete as details are missing from the landscaping plan. Commissioner Corbett asked if there is a requirement for a detailed landscaping plan as part of the application process. Commissioner Johnson confirmed that it is part of the requirements provided to the applicant that a detailed landscaping plan must be included. Commissioner Stone commented that he would think that a house of this scale would have more landscaping than two trees and would hope that the landscaping plan would be provided at the next meeting. Commissioner Corbett agreed that there should be a plan, but also recognized that this is a crude layout and the type of flowers someone is going to plant is not a detail people often plan for at this level of planning. He stated that he wanted to ensure that there is an actual requirement for that level of detail. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that the Commission has debated this issue before, and it comes down to a difference in interpretation of the minimum requirements. She stated that while minimal, the applicant has provided a plant schedule that identifies two swamp white oaks as the two trees. She stated that it is not a full landscape schedule of all perennial beds, which would be a preference of the Commission, but the minimum landscape requirements of the City would be for two overstory trees, and the applicant has met that requirement. Commissioner Johnson stated that while she understands and appreciates that, the intention of the applicant is to plant more. She stated that if the intention is to have just two trees and sod, then Page 19 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 8 this would be acceptable. She noted previous applications that sailed through smoothly because of the level of detail that was provided for landscaping. Commissioner Corbett commented that there seems to be a discontinuity between the requirements of City Code and the desire expressed by Commissioner Johnson. He stated that he would not want to base the process on a preference for a previous application that included very detailed information about landscaping. Commissioner Stone asked why every little detail would need to be decided if the minimum requirement has been met. He noted that anyone can install additional landscaping on their property after the minimum requirements are met. Commissioner Corbett commented that he does not want this to be subjective. He commented that changes can always be made to landscaping after the fact. Commissioner Nath commented that without written requirements in Code, the issue is very subjective. He stated that he would see this to be a complete landscaping plan as it meets the requirements of the City Code, although Commissioner Johnson would like to see more information. He noted that while Commissioner Johnson would deem this landscaping plan as incomplete, he would consider it to be the bare minimum. He stated that while he would love a more detailed landscaping plan, it is not required under Code. Commissioner Johnson stated that a tree inventory would be important. Commissioner Corbett asked if it is required. Commissioner Johnson was unsure and asked that staff follow up on that. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 C)PLANNING CASE 2025-13 ST. AUGUSTINE SCHOOL, 1345 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that St. Augustine School is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the property located at 1345 Mendota Heights Road. The CUP would allow for the use of space as a middle and secondary private school, or 6th – 12th grades, at the former Sanford Brown College site, within the space previously used by Interim Use Permit in 2017-2019 for Minnehaha Academy. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Page 20 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 8 Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Corbett asked if this is a conditional use allowed in both industrial and business districts. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that the use is only listed within the business district and not the industrial district. She noted that the previous trade school use was listed. She stated that the property is currently zoned B-1, general business. Chair Field believed that there were regulations for small class sizes with the previous user, Minnehaha Academy. He asked if there would be an ability to cap the number of students. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that if the expansion of the school were necessary to occupy additional space in the building, an amendment would be needed for the CUP. She commented that a condition could be added, but was unsure of the language that would be used and the onus that could be placed on the applicant and staff. Chair Field stated that perhaps a cap on the number of students could be added to the conditions that would trigger a review. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that it could be written as a condition, but there could be enforcement issues. She noted that the enrollment could expand past 40 students and still be within the fire code occupancy for the building. She noted that there would be other triggers that would require a review/amendment, including parking and the need for additional space. She stated that the applicant can provide additional information on the vision for the school and small classroom size. Bill Faulkner, representing the applicant, stated that the vision for the school is to keep the classrooms small. He stated that they would love to have that issue with expanded enrollment, but in that case, they would prefer to expand the size of the school rather than the size of the classroom. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Page 21 of 109 July 22, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 8 COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FROM ST. AUGUSTINE SCHOOL FOR A MIDDLE AND SECONDARY (PRIVATE) SCHOOL AT 1345 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE POLICIES AND STANDARDS OF THE CITY CODE AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1.ALL PARKING FOR THE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING MUST BE ACCOMMODATED ON SITE. ANY INDICATION THAT THE SITE IS UNDER PARKED MAY RESULT IN REQUIRED AMENDMENTS TO THE SITE PLAN AND/OR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 2.ANY NEW REMODELING OR INTERIOR WORK (INCLUDING BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING/COOLING, AND OTHER RELATED WORK) MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR STANDARD BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING STARTED. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its August 6, 2025, meeting. New and Unfinished Business Staff Announcements / Updates Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a review on recent City Council actions on cases previously reviewed by the Commission as well as other items of interest to the Commission. Adjournment COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:23 P.M. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Page 22 of 109 6.e REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Authorize Signer for Solid Waste Abatement Grant from Dakota County ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation CONTACT: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation/Assistant Public Works Director ACTION REQUEST: Authorize the City Administrator to be the authorized signer for the Solid Waste Abatement Grant from Dakota County. BACKGROUND: With Mendota Heights becoming the fiscal agent of the Solid Waste Abatement Grant from Dakota County beginning in 2026, the City will now be responsible for being the authorized signer of the grant documents. The grant includes the following timeline for documents that will need to be signed by the City: •July: Mid-year report of the grant activities and a reimbursement request for expenses from January-June of the current year •October: Preliminary grant application for next year is due to Dakota County for review •January: Year-end reporting of grant activities and a reimbursement request for expenses from July-December of the previous year Staff recommends that the City Administrator be the authorized signer for the Solid Waste Abatement Grant Documents listed above. The City Council would remain the designated signer for the final contract agreement between the City of Mendota Heights and Dakota County--which is a requirement of all cities participating in the grant program. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Page 23 of 109 None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 24 of 109 6.f REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Accept Parks and Recreation Commissioner Resignation and Authorize the Advertisement of the Commission Opening ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Noel Mills Ford, Administrative Special Projects Coordinator ACTION REQUEST: Accept the resignation of Daniel Sherer from the Parks and Recreation Commission and authorize the advertisement of the commission opening. BACKGROUND: Commissioner Daniel Sherer has resigned from the Parks and Recreation Commission. Commissioner Sherer has served on the Parks and Recreation Commission since February of 2019. His term is set to expire on January 31, 2028. The City is grateful for Dan’s years of service and commitment to parks and recreation in Mendota Heights. In addition to accepting his resignation, staff are seeking authorization to advertise the open commission seat. Once the City Council appoints a new person to the seat, they will fulfill the remainder of the term. With the authorization of the City Council, staff will post the opening from Sept. 3-Sept. 19 with interviews of candidates occurring in late September and an anticipated appointment by the City Council at the Oct. 7 meeting. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 25 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank 6.g REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve the Promotion of James Walrath from Police Cadet to Police Officer ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Kelly Torkelson, Assistant City Administrator Kelly McCarthy, Police Chief ACTION REQUEST: Approve the promotion of James Walrath from Police Cadet to Police Officer. BACKGROUND: The Police Cadet program maximizes the city's recruitment efforts by attracting top candidates who are still in the process of completing the required training to become a licensed police officer. With the completion of his program requirements, staff are recommending the promotion of James Walrath from Police Cadet to Police Officer with the City of Mendota Heights effective September 10, 2025. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: This position was authorized by the City Council to allow the city to leverage available funds through the State's IC POET program that provided $50,000 of funding to support the training of the police cadet. The City Council authorized this position when the position was initially authorized for posting and again with the authorization to hire the police cadet position. This position has been included as a temporarily budgeted item in the 2026 budget meaning that in the case of turnover of an existing staff member, the department will not replace the position. Costs for the 2025 salary will be covered by the Police Department budget. James Walrath will be compensated at step 1 of the pay schedule set forth in the 2024-2025 LELS Labor Contract with a pay rate of $38.13 per hour. ATTACHMENTS: None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 26 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank 6.h REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Authorize Installation of Garage Door at Public Works Facility ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Public Works CONTACT: John Boland, Public Works Superintendent ACTION REQUEST: Authorize the installation of a new garage door with services provided from Mahowald Services, Crawford Door, Devito, Mid-Northern Electrical and special inspections by an outside contractor. BACKGROUND: As part of the 2025 Capital Improvement Plan, the City budgeted $80,000 for the installation of a new garage door on the west parking garage area for access to this space. Staff received two quotes for this project, along with quotes for the installation of the door and moving existing mechanicals and electrical conduits. There will also be fees for special inspections that are outside the scope of the regular building inspections. Crawford Door does all of the overhead door maintenance at City facilities, and as such, staff did not solicit a second quote on the garage door portion of this project. Cutting and Masonry Work Mahowald Services LLC: $44,160 Frandrup Masonry: $52,990 Garage Door Crawford Door: $16,750 Electrical and Mechanical Work Devito: $5,100 Mid-Northern Electrical: $1,250 FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The total project will be $67,260, plus an estimated $2,000 for special inspections. This project will come in under budget by $10,000. ATTACHMENTS: Page 27 of 109 None CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 28 of 109 6.i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Resolution 2025-54 to Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising Project ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUEST: Approve Resolution 2025-54 to accept bids and award a contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising Project. BACKGROUND: The City of Mendota Heights maintains approximately 77 miles of sanitary sewer pipe, including 6.5 miles of Sanitary Interceptor Line. Much of this system is aging, with many pipes approaching 60 years in service, and will require ongoing maintenance and future repairs. To extend the useful life of the system and identify needed improvements, the City follows a regular maintenance program that includes a combination of cleaning and televising. Televising provides detailed condition assessments, allowing staff to identify locations in need of immediate or future repairs. City policy establishes a goal of televising the entire sanitary sewer system on a 10-year cycle, with cleaning performed as necessary based on inspections and condition assessments. To meet this goal, staff typically inspect and televise 7–9 miles of pipe annually. For 2025, the Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising Project includes approximately 8.8 miles of sanitary sewer, primarily located in the northern portion of the City. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Six (6) bids, detailed below, were received in the Mendota Heights Council Chambers on Thursday, August 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & Televising project: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Pipe Services $45,896.40 Page 29 of 109 MainSaver North Central Inc $57,167.55 Hydro-Klean LLC $74,992.23 Visu-Sewer $86,259.70 Redzone Robotics, Inc $242,252.50 National Power Rodding $433,991.00 The City’s Capital Improvement Plan identifies a budget of $62,000 for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & Televising Project. The lowest responsible bid was submitted by Pipe Services in the amount of $45,896.40, which is below both the project budget and the Engineer’s Estimate of $65,195.25. Funding for this project is available in the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-54 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & Televising Project 2.2025 Sanitary Sewer Cleaning & Televising Project Bid Abstract CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 30 of 109 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-54 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2025 SANITARY SEWER CLEANING AND TELEVISING PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed cleaning and televising of sanitary sewers to serve the area referred to as 2025 Sanitary Sewer Televising and Cleaning Project (City Project No. 202504), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Pipe Services $45,896.40 MainSaver North Central Inc $57,167.55 Hydro-Klean LLC $74,992.23 Visu-Sewer $86,259.70 Redzone Robotics, Inc $242,252.50 National Power Rodding $433,991.00 and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommends that the low bid submitted by Pipe Services of Shakopee, Minnesota, be accepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1.That the bids for the above project are hereby received and accepted. 2. That the bid of Pipe Services of Shakopee, Minnesota, submitted for the cleaning and televising of the above described project be and the same is hereby accepted. 3. That the contract be awarded to Pipe Services of Shakopee, Minnesota, and that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of September, 2025. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor _________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 31 of 109 PROJECT: PROJECT #:BID ADVERTISEMENT DATE:7/28/2025 BID OPENING DATE:8/21/2025 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:9/2/2025 By:_______________________________________________________8/21/2025 2025 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance District 2 Televising & Selective Cleaning ITEM NO.UNIT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED UNIT PRICE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT 1 Project Mobilization L.S.1 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $850.00 $850.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $10,097.96 $10,097.96 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 Clean & Televise 9" Sewer in Easements L.F.270 $3.50 $945.00 $4.48 $1,209.60 $3.45 $931.50 $2.45 $661.50 $5.50 $1,485.00 $21.70 $5,859.00 $100.00 $27,000.00 3 Clean & Televise 15" Sewer in Easements L.F.549 $3.50 $1,921.50 $4.48 $2,459.52 $3.45 $1,894.05 $2.45 $1,345.05 $5.50 $3,019.50 $21.70 $11,913.30 $100.00 $54,900.00 4 Clean & Televise 18" Sewer in Easements L.F.140 $3.50 $490.00 $4.48 $627.20 $3.45 $483.00 $2.45 $343.00 $5.50 $770.00 $21.70 $3,038.00 $150.00 $21,000.00 5 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 4" Sewer in R.O.W.L.F.116 $1.25 $145.00 $0.78 $90.48 $0.95 $110.20 $2.36 $273.76 $5.00 $580.00 $3.70 $429.20 $4.00 $464.00 6 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 8" Sewer in R.O.W.L.F.11,685 $1.25 $14,606.38 $0.78 $9,114.30 $0.95 $11,100.75 $1.18 $13,788.30 $1.55 $18,111.75 $3.70 $43,234.50 $4.00 $46,740.00 7 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 9" Sewer in R.O.W. L.F.24,120 $1.25 $30,149.50 $0.78 $18,813.60 $0.95 $22,914.00 $1.18 $28,461.60 $1.55 $37,386.00 $3.70 $89,244.00 $4.00 $96,480.00 8 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 10" Sewer in R.O.W. L.F.2,048 $1.26 $2,572.66 $0.78 $1,597.44 $0.95 $1,945.60 $1.18 $2,416.64 $1.55 $3,174.40 $3.70 $7,577.60 $4.00 $8,192.00 9 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 15" Sewer in R.O.W. L.F.2,355 $1.25 $2,943.75 $0.78 $1,836.90 $0.95 $2,237.25 $1.18 $2,778.90 $1.55 $3,650.25 $3.70 $8,713.50 $4.00 $9,420.00 10 Televise Only (City Clean 7/25) - 9" Sewer in Easments L.F.465 $3.00 $1,395.00 $1.48 $688.20 $1.60 $744.00 $2.36 $1,097.40 $2.55 $1,185.75 $3.70 $1,720.50 $25.00 $11,625.00 11 Televise Only - 6" Sewer in Easements L.F.26 $1.25 $32.50 $1.48 $38.48 $1.60 $41.60 $2.36 $61.36 $5.00 $130.00 $3.70 $96.20 $10.00 $260.00 12 Televise Only - 8" Sewer in Easements L.F.1,359 $1.25 $1,698.38 $1.48 $2,011.32 $1.60 $2,174.40 $2.36 $3,207.24 $2.55 $3,465.45 $3.70 $5,028.30 $10.00 $13,590.00 13 Televise Only - 9" Sewer in Easements L.F.2,857 $1.25 $3,576.59 $1.48 $4,228.36 $1.60 $4,571.20 $2.36 $6,742.52 $2.55 $7,285.35 $3.70 $10,570.90 $10.00 $28,570.00 14 Televise Only - 10" Sewer in Easements L.F.1,153 $1.25 $1,441.50 $1.48 $1,706.44 $1.60 $1,844.80 $2.36 $2,721.08 $2.55 $2,940.15 $3.70 $4,266.10 $10.00 $11,530.00 15 Televise Only - 15" Sewer in Easements L.F.422 $1.25 $527.50 $1.48 $624.56 $1.60 $675.20 $2.36 $995.92 $2.55 $1,076.10 $3.70 $1,561.40 $10.00 $4,220.00 Engineer's Estimate $65,195.25 (1) Pipe Services $45,896.40 (2) MainSaver North Central Inc (Pipe Detectives) $57,167.55 (3) Hydro-Klean LLC.$74,992.23 (4) Visu-Sewer $86,259.70 (5) Redzone Robotics, Inc.$242,252.50 (6) National Power Rodding $433,991.00 % of Estimate = 100%% of Estimate = 70%% of Estimate = 88%% of Estimate = 115%% of Estimate = 132%% of Estimate = 372%% of Estimate = 666% RRInc Bid 8/21/25 =$241,279.30 Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director To be on City Council Agenda 9/2/25 2025 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance District 2 Televising & Selective Cleaning TOT LF 47,565 Engineer's Estimate (1) Pipe Services (2) MainSaver North Central Inc (Pipe Detectives)(3) Hydro-Klean LLC.(4) Visu-Sewer (5) Redzone Robotics, Inc.(6) National Power Rodding SCHEDULE 'A' ITEM DESCRIPTION I certify that I have personally opened and read all bids, verified this abstract and find it correct. BID ABSTRACT 2025 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance District 2 Televising & Selective Cleaning MH202504 SCHEDULE 'A' Page 1 of 1 Page 32 of 109 6.j REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Resolution 2025-55 to Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUEST: Approve Resolution 2025-55 to accept bids and award a contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. BACKGROUND: The City of Mendota Heights maintains approximately 77 miles of sanitary sewer pipe, including 6.5 miles of Sanitary Interceptor Line. Much of this system is aging, with many pipes approaching 60 years in service, and will require ongoing maintenance and future repairs. To extend the useful life of the system and identify needed improvements, the City follows a regular maintenance program that includes a combination of cleaning and televising. Televising provides detailed condition assessments, allowing staff to identify locations in need of immediate or future repairs. When repairs are necessary, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining is an effective method to extend the useful life of the system without full excavation. The 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project consists of lining approximately 10,144 feet of sanitary sewer pipe and reinstating 141 lateral connections within the Friendly Hills Neighborhood. This project area was identified through the City’s routine inspection and assessment program. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Five (5) bids, detailed below, were received in the Mendota Heights Council Chambers on Tuesday, August 26, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project. NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Visu-Sewer $401,647.00 Insituform Tech. USA, LLC $424,808.22 Page 33 of 109 Hydro-Klean LLC $443,198.41 Veit & Company, Inc. $462,451.89 National Power Rodding $607,878.00 The City’s Capital Improvement Plan identifies a budget of $350,000 for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project. The lowest responsible bid was submitted by Visu-Sewer in the amount of $401,647.00 which exceeds the Engineer’s Estimate of $350,571.00. The project is proposed to be funded through the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund, which has an adequate balance to cover the project costs. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-55 to Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project 2.2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Bid Abstract CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 34 of 109 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-55 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2025 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed cleaning and televising of sanitary sewers to serve the area referred to as 2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 202505), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Visu-Sewer $401,647.00 Insituform Tech. USA, LLC $424,808.22 Hydro-Klean LLC $443,198.41 Veit & Company, Inc. $462,451.89 National Power Rodding $607,878.00 and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommends that the low bid submitted by Visu- Sewer of Oak Grove, Minnesota, be accepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1.That the bids for the above project are hereby received and accepted. 2. That the bid of Visu-Sewer of Oak Grove, Minnesota, submitted for the rehabilitation of the above described project be and the same is hereby accepted. 3. That the contract be awarded to Visu-Sewer of Oak Grove, Minnesota, and that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of September, 2025. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor _________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 35 of 109 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS BID ABSTRACT DATE:8/26/2025 PROJECT:2025 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation PROJECT #:MH202505 I certify that I have personally opened and read all bids, verified this abstract and find it correct. By:8/26/2025 SCHEDULE 'A' - 2025 CIPP LINING ITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED UNIT PRICE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATED AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT 1 6" CIPP L.F. 150 $35.00 $5,250.00 $86.50 $12,975.00 $67.00 $10,050.00 $220.40 $33,060.00 $75.00 $11,250.00 $100.00 $15,000.00 2 8" CIPP L.F. 1,776 $28.50 $50,616.00 $34.80 $61,804.80 $31.50 $55,944.00 $38.70 $68,731.20 $39.00 $69,264.00 $43.00 $76,368.00 3 9" CIPP L.F. 8,218 $32.50 $267,085.00 $35.40 $290,917.20 $39.00 $320,502.00 $39.20 $322,145.60 $44.00 $361,592.00 $45.00 $369,810.00 4 Lateral Reinstatements (any size)Ea. 141 $120.00 $16,920.00 $200.00 $28,200.00 $44.00 $6,204.00 $50.00 $7,050.00 $80.00 $11,280.00 $500.00 $70,500.00 5 Protruding Tap Trimming (any size)Ea. 14 $300.00 $4,200.00 $375.00 $5,250.00 $722.00 $10,108.00 $75.00 $1,050.00 $300.00 $4,200.00 $800.00 $11,200.00 6 Mobilization L.S. 1 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $11,161.61 $11,161.61 $4,865.89 $4,865.89 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 2025 SANITARY SEWER CIPP LINING GRAND TOTAL:$350,571.00 $401,647.00 $424,808.00 $443,198.41 $462,451.89 $607,878.00 Visu-Sewer Insituform Tech. USA, LLC Hydro-Klean Veit & Company, Inc. National Power Rodding Corp. Apparent Low Bid #1 Submitted Bid #2 Submitted Bid #3 Submitted Bid #4 Submitted Bid #5 BID ABSTRACT Page 1 of 1 Page 36 of 109 6.k REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Reimbursement for Storm Sewer Relocation at 1770 Dodd Road ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director ACTION REQUEST: Approve a reimbursement of a storm sewer relocation cost at 1770 Dodd Road. BACKGROUND: The City of Mendota Heights installed a 24” storm sewer culvert in 2014 in response to flooding at 1760, 1762, and 1770 Dodd Road. These properties are part of the Pine Creek Estates, which was developed in 1997 and included an undersized 15” culvert that discharged into a drainage ditch. The 2014 culvert installation followed the existing drainage ditch and included a bend at the property line between 1770 and 1780 Dodd Road. A plat application was approved for the 1770 Dodd Road property in 2022 titled the Audrey Addition, which subdivided the property into two parcels. The application data only included the two ends of the pipe and did not capture the bend. Due to this issue, portions of the storm sewer were outside the platted drainage easement on private property (see attached map). A new home was constructed at 1770 Dodd Road, and the homeowner intended to install a swimming pool. The storm sewer outside the easement would need to be relocated into the easement to allow for the pool construction. Staff consulted with the city legal department and were advised to work with the homeowner to relocate this line. The homeowner provided an engineered plan to the city and is asking for reimbursement of 50 percent of the relocation costs. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The final invoice for the relocation is $22,614. The Council is asked to approve a reimbursement of $11,307. The reimbursement will be funded by the storm water utility fund. ATTACHMENTS: 1.1770 Dodd Road Map 2.Invoice Urban Escapes Page 37 of 109 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 38 of 109 (G!.666666666666666666666666666666666 6 66666666* !66666666666666!!2 !!2 !!2 1770 1780 1760 1762 679 1768 702 334 452 310 244 13481124149403614310 140 501DODD RDThis im agery is co p yrighted an d licen sed by Nearm ap U S In c, which retain so wn ership o f the im agery. It is bein g p ro vided by Dako ta Co un ty un der theterm s o f that licen se. U n der that licen se, Dako ta Co un ty is allo wed top ro vide access to the “Offlin e Co p y Add-On fo r Go vern m en t”, o n which thisim age services is based, at 6-in ch reso lutio n , six m o n ths after the cap turedate, p ro vided the user ackn o wledges that the im agery will be used in theirn o rm al co urse o f busin ess an d m ust n o t be reso ld o r distributed fo r the 11 22 11 22 City Base Map Date: 3/25/2024 City o fMen do taHeights050 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 39 of 109 Urban Escapes dba/Urban Services 7664 Addisen Path INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55077 +16129644283 urbanescapes@gmail.com Urban Escapes Invoice BILL TO Steve Benz 1770 Dodd Rd Mendota heights, mn 55118 INVOICE #DATE TOTAL DUE DUE DATE TERMS ENCLOSED 10113 06/25/2025 $22,614.00 07/01/2025 Due on receipt P.O. NUMBER Culvert Move DATE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT Landscaping 3 Concrete Sewer Manholes with base. County materials custom designed to engineering specs 1 7,150.00 7,150.00 Landscaping 3 Lids for concrete Manholes per engineering specs 1 2,100.00 2,100.00 Landscaping 24" Pipe and couplings.1 3,180.00 3,180.00 Landscaping Installing pipe 2 days 2.50 3,400.00 8,500.00 Landscaping misc materials needed to install. concrete, hydraulic concrete, 16 yards of gravelfor proper bas 1 1,684.00 1,684.00 SUBTOTAL 22,614.00 TAX 0.00 TOTAL 22,614.00 BALANCE DUE $22,614.00 Page 40 of 109 6.l REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2025-53 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $2,820,000 in General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A ITEM TYPE: Consent Item DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-53 Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $2,820,000 in General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A. BACKGROUND: The City ordered the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements at the September 17, 2024, City Council Meeting. This project is a two-year project that will be completed in 2026. Tonight begins the process of issuing general obligation improvement bonds to finance this project. Ehlers & Associates will assist the City with the issuance of these bonds. We will have the proceeds of these bonds invested with Ehlers. This will be done because it is a multi-year project. The proceeds will be placed in a dedicated account for the project and will be drawn down as project expenses are incurred. The schedule is as follows: •Pre-Sale Review by Council September 2, 2025 •Conference with the Rating Agency Week of September 22, 2025 •Distribute Official Statement September 25, 2025 •Award Sale of Bonds October 7, 2025 •Estimated Closing Date October 28, 2025 Ehlers has prepared a Pre-Sale report that is attached for council review. The City will be issuing $2,820,000 General Obligation Bonds for the street project with a term of 10 years. The assessment rate will be 2% over the true interest costs of the bonds issued. The special assessments will be certified this fall for both phases of this project. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Page 41 of 109 The bonds will be paid with a combination of special assessments and an amount levied each year for the bond payments. ATTACHMENTS: 1.PresaleReportMendotaHeights.2025A 2.Mendota Heights 2025A Presale Resolution CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 42 of 109 September 2, 2025 PRE-SALE REPORT FOR City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Prepared by: Ehlers 3001 Broadway Street, Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55413 Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor Keith Dahl, Senior Municipal Advisor BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Page 43 of 109 Presale Report City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota September 2, 2025 Page 1 Proposed Issue: $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Purposes: The proposed issue includes financing for the Friendly Hills street rehabilitation and water main replacement, a project to completed in two phases during 2025 and 2026. Debt service will be paid from special assessments and taxes. The City intends to levy a total of $1,916,582 in special assessments to benefitting property owners, of which $745,892 is anticipated to be collected in pre-paid assessments. The remaining assessments will be collected over a 10-year period from 2026 through 2035. They will be repaid at a rate equal to 2% over the True Interest Cost of the Bonds, using an equal principal repayment structure. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters: •429 – Improvement Bonding Authority •475 – General Bonding Authority Because the City is assessing at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds can be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City’s debt limit. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. Term/Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for a term of 12 years. Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2028 through 2037. Interest will be due every six months beginning August 1, 2026. The Bonds will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2034 or any date thereafter. Bank Qualification: Because the City is expecting to issue no more than $10,000,000 in tax exempt debt during the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as “bank qualified” obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower interest rates. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DEBT Page 44 of 109 Presale Report City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota September 2, 2025 Page 2 Rating: The City’s most recent bond issues were rated by S&P Global Ratings. The current rating on those bonds is “AAA”/Stable Outlook. The City will request a new rating for the Bonds. Basis for Recommendation: Based on your objectives, financial situation and need, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, experience with the issuance of Bonds and long-term financial capacity, as well as the tax status considerations related to the Bonds and the structure, timing and other similar matters related to the Bonds, we are recommending the issuance of Bonds as a suitable option. Method of Sale/Placement: We are recommending the Bonds be issued as municipal securities and offered through a competitive underwriting process. You will solicit competitive bids, which we will compile on your behalf, for the purchase of the Bonds from underwriters and banks. An allowance for discount bidding will be incorporated in the terms of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the transaction. If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to reduce your borrowing amount. Premium Pricing: In some cases, investors in municipal bonds prefer “premium” pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered “reoffering premium.” The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.00% of the face amount of the issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000. For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the net premium to reduce the size of the issue for the project. The resulting adjustments may slightly change the true interest cost of the issue, either up or down. The amount of premium can be restricted in the bid specifications. Restrictions on premium may result in fewer bids, but may also eliminate large adjustments on the day of sale and unintended impacts with respect to debt service payment. Ehlers will identify appropriate premium restrictions for the Bonds intended to achieve the City’s objectives for this financing. Page 45 of 109 Presale Report City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota September 2, 2025 Page 3 Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that there are no refunding opportunities at this time. We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City’s outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt subject to a continuing disclosure undertaking (including this issue) and this issue does not meet an available exemption from continuing disclosure, the City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statement annually, as well as providing notices of the occurrence of certain reportable events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports. Arbitrage Monitoring: The City must ensure compliance with certain sections of the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations (“Arbitrage Rules”) throughout the life of the issue to maintain the tax- exempt status of the Bonds. These Arbitrage Rules apply to amounts held in construction, escrow, reserve, debt service account(s), etc., along with related investment income on each fund/account. IRS audits will verify compliance with rebate, yield restriction and records retention requirements within the Arbitrage Rules. The City’s specific arbitrage responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate (the “Tax Compliance Document”) prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. The Bonds may qualify for one or more exception(s) to the Arbitrage Rules by meeting 1) small issuer exception, 2) spend down requirements, 3) bona fide debt service fund limits, 4) reasonable reserve requirements, 5) expenditure within an available period limitations, 6) investments yield restrictions, 7) de minimis rules, or; 8) borrower limited requirements. An Ehlers arbitrage expert will contact the City within 30 days after the sale date to review the City’s specific responsibilities for the Bonds. The City is currently receiving arbitrage services from Ehlers in relation to the Bonds. Investment of Bond Proceeds: Ehlers can assist the City in developing a strategy to invest your Bond proceeds until the funds are needed to pay project costs. Page 46 of 109 Presale Report City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota September 2, 2025 Page 4 Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We have assumed a portion of the special assessments will be pre-paid and we have assumed that assessments will be levied as projected. If the City receives a significantly higher amount of pre-paid assessments or does not levy the assessments, it may need to increase the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than the expected assessment interest rate. Other Service Providers: This debt issuance will require the engagement of other public finance service providers. This section identifies those other service providers, so Ehlers can coordinate their engagement on your behalf. Where you have previously used a particular firm to provide a service, we have assumed that you will continue that relationship. For services you have not previously required, we have identified a service provider. Fees charged by these service providers will be paid from proceeds of the obligation, unless you notify us that you wish to pay them from other sources. Our pre-sale bond sizing includes a good faith estimate of these fees, but the final fees may vary. If you have any questions pertaining to the identified service providers or their role, or if you would like to use a different service provider for any of the listed services please contact us. Bond Counsel: Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP Paying Agent: Bond Trust Services Corporation Rating Agency: S&P Global Ratings (S&P) Summary: The decisions to be made by the City Council are as follows: •Accept or modify the finance assumptions described in this report •Adopt the resolution attached to this report. Page 47 of 109 Presale Report City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota September 2, 2025 Page 5 Pre-Sale Review by City Council: September 2, 2025 Due Diligence Call to Review Official Statement & Conference with Rating Agency: Week of September 22, 2025 Distribute Official Statement: September 25, 2025 City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: October 7, 2025 Estimated Closing Date: October 28, 2025 Attachments Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds Estimated Proposed Debt Service Schedule Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed with Bond Sale EHLERS’ CONTACTS Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor (651)697-8506 Keith Dahl, Senior Municipal Advisor (651)697-8595 Emily Wilkie, Senior Public Finance Analyst (651)697-8588 Alicia Gage, Senior Financial Analyst (651)697-8551 PROPOSED DEBT ISSUANCE SCHEDULE EHLERS’ CONTACTS Page 48 of 109 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates plus 50bps Sources & Uses Dated 10/28/2025 | Delivered 10/28/2025 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $2,820,000.00 Prepaid Assessments 745,892.00 MSA Funds 593,482.00 Utility Franchise Fees 23,039.00 St. Paul Reg Water 2,236,149.00 Utility Revenue Funds 1,550,737.00 Total Sources $7,969,299.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)33,840.00 Costs of Issuance 71,000.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 7,861,883.00 Rounding Amount 2,576.00 Total Uses $7,969,299.00 Series 2025A GO Imp Bonds | SINGLE PURPOSE | 8/28/2025 | 8:45 AM Page 49 of 109 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates plus 50bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 10/28/2025 ----- 08/01/2026 --74,138.46 74,138.46 - 02/01/2027 --48,882.50 48,882.50 123,020.96 08/01/2027 --48,882.50 48,882.50 - 02/01/2028 280,000.00 3.000%48,882.50 328,882.50 377,765.00 08/01/2028 --44,682.50 44,682.50 - 02/01/2029 285,000.00 3.000%44,682.50 329,682.50 374,365.00 08/01/2029 --40,407.50 40,407.50 - 02/01/2030 285,000.00 3.050%40,407.50 325,407.50 365,815.00 08/01/2030 --36,061.25 36,061.25 - 02/01/2031 285,000.00 3.200%36,061.25 321,061.25 357,122.50 08/01/2031 --31,501.25 31,501.25 - 02/01/2032 290,000.00 3.350%31,501.25 321,501.25 353,002.50 08/01/2032 --26,643.75 26,643.75 - 02/01/2033 295,000.00 3.550%26,643.75 321,643.75 348,287.50 08/01/2033 --21,407.50 21,407.50 - 02/01/2034 295,000.00 3.700%21,407.50 316,407.50 337,815.00 08/01/2034 --15,950.00 15,950.00 - 02/01/2035 300,000.00 3.800%15,950.00 315,950.00 331,900.00 08/01/2035 --10,250.00 10,250.00 - 02/01/2036 305,000.00 4.000%10,250.00 315,250.00 325,500.00 08/01/2036 --4,150.00 4,150.00 - 02/01/2037 200,000.00 4.150%4,150.00 204,150.00 208,300.00 Total $2,820,000.00 -$682,893.46 $3,502,893.46 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $18,823.50 Average Life 6.675 Years Average Coupon 3.6278772% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.8076525% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.8181686% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.6097424% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)4.2666219% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.6278772% Weighted Average Maturity 6.675 Years Series 2025A GO Imp Bonds | SINGLE PURPOSE | 8/28/2025 | 8:45 AM Page 50 of 109 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates plus 50bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% of Total Assessments Levy/(Surplus) 02/01/2026 ------- 02/01/2027 --123,020.96 123,020.96 129,172.01 184,969.02 (55,797.01) 02/01/2028 280,000.00 3.000%97,765.00 377,765.00 396,653.25 178,179.02 218,474.23 02/01/2029 285,000.00 3.000%89,365.00 374,365.00 393,083.25 171,389.02 221,694.23 02/01/2030 285,000.00 3.050%80,815.00 365,815.00 384,105.75 164,599.02 219,506.73 02/01/2031 285,000.00 3.200%72,122.50 357,122.50 374,978.63 157,809.02 217,169.61 02/01/2032 290,000.00 3.350%63,002.50 353,002.50 370,652.63 151,019.02 219,633.61 02/01/2033 295,000.00 3.550%53,287.50 348,287.50 365,701.88 144,229.00 221,472.88 02/01/2034 295,000.00 3.700%42,815.00 337,815.00 354,705.75 137,439.00 217,266.75 02/01/2035 300,000.00 3.800%31,900.00 331,900.00 348,495.00 130,649.00 217,846.00 02/01/2036 305,000.00 4.000%20,500.00 325,500.00 341,775.00 123,859.00 217,916.00 02/01/2037 200,000.00 4.150%8,300.00 208,300.00 218,715.00 -218,715.00 Total $2,820,000.00 -$682,893.46 $3,502,893.46 $3,678,038.13 $1,544,140.12 $2,133,898.01 Significant Dates Dated 10/28/2025 First Coupon Date 8/01/2026 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $18,823.50 Average Life 6.675 Years Average Coupon 3.6278772% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.8076525% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.8181686% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.6097424% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)4.2666219% Series 2025A GO Imp Bonds | SINGLE PURPOSE | 8/28/2025 | 8:45 AM Page 51 of 109 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $1,170,690 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A SINGLE PURPOSE - Assessments TIC plus 2.0% - Equal Principal Assessments Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/31/2026 117,069.00 5.800%67,900.02 184,969.02 12/31/2027 117,069.00 5.800%61,110.02 178,179.02 12/31/2028 117,069.00 5.800%54,320.02 171,389.02 12/31/2029 117,069.00 5.800%47,530.02 164,599.02 12/31/2030 117,069.00 5.800%40,740.02 157,809.02 12/31/2031 117,069.00 5.800%33,950.02 151,019.02 12/31/2032 117,069.00 5.800%27,160.00 144,229.00 12/31/2033 117,069.00 5.800%20,370.00 137,439.00 12/31/2034 117,069.00 5.800%13,580.00 130,649.00 12/31/2035 117,069.00 5.800%6,790.00 123,859.00 Total $1,170,690.00 -$373,450.12 $1,544,140.12 Significant Dates Filing Date 1/01/2026 First Payment Date 12/31/2026 Series 2025A GO Imp Bds - | SINGLE PURPOSE | 8/28/2025 | 8:44 AM Page 52 of 109 City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates plus 50bps Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 10/28/2025 | Delivered 10/28/2025 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Municipal Advisor $38,000.00 Bond Counsel $16,000.00 Rating Agency Fee $16,000.00 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 TOTAL $71,000.00 Series 2025A GO Imp Bonds | SINGLE PURPOSE | 8/28/2025 | 8:45 AM Page 53 of 109 175966857v2 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA HELD: SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, was duly held at City Hall on September 2, 2025, at 6:00 P.M., for the purpose, in part, of providing for the issuance and sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member ________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-53 22025.53 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $2,820,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2025A A. WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "City") has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A (the "Bonds"), to finance the Friendly Hills street rehabilitation and water main replacement project in the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization. The Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The Council shall meet at 6:00 P.M. on October 7, 2025, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member _______________________ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 54 of 109 175966857v2 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as the minutes relate to providing for the issuance and sale of $2,820,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2025A. WITNESS my hand on September 2, 2025. __________________________________________ City Clerk Page 55 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank Page 56 of 1096.m This page is intentionally left blank Page 57 of 1096.n Page 58 of 109 Page 59 of 109 Page 60 of 109 Page 61 of 109 Page 62 of 109 Page 63 of 109 Page 64 of 109 Page 65 of 109 Page 66 of 109 Page 67 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank 9.a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Traffic Revision at 750 Main Street ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director ACTION REQUEST: Approve a traffic revision at 750 Main Street in the Village/Town Centre. BACKGROUND: A new business, Happy Joe’s Pizza and Ice Cream, is looking to occupy a vacant space at 750 Main Street. This new business is requesting a pickup window for food orders but will not have a drive through to order food. The existing 750 Main Street building has two tunnels for vehicles, which are signed as one-way access. To accommodate the proposed pickup window, the new tenant would like to reverse the one-way configuration of the west tunnel. A traffic study was completed by a registered professional engineer from a local consulting firm. The study involved a 48-hour data collection of existing traffic movements and recommendations to provide for the reversing of traffic in the west tunnel. The east tunnel is not proposed to have changes or improvements completed. Based on the study, there are 12 cars per day that use the west tunnel. Permanent signage and striping, as well as extra temporary signage, are proposed. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: The proposed tenant and property owner would implement the changes to the site. The city would not have costs applied to the changes. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Mendota Heights Site Review CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government Page 68 of 109 DRAFT MEMORANDUM www.sr fconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer SRF Project No. 19569.00 To: Brian Smith Happy Joe’s Pizza & Ice Cream From: Tom Sachi, PE, Senior Project Manager Eric Wurst, EIT, Engineer II Date: August 25, 2025 Subject: Mendota Heights Site Review, Happy Joe’s Pizza & Ice Cream Introduction SRF has completed a site review at the proposed Happy Joe’s Pizza & Ice Cream development in Mendota Heights, MN. The proposed location is part of the existing Village at Mendota Heights development in the northeast quadrant of the Market Street and Linden Street intersection (see Figure 1). The main objectives of the study are to review existing traffic operations within the study area, assess existing circulation patterns at the site, review the proposed changes to circulation patterns, and provide recommendations regarding circulation, signing, and striping to deliver safe and efficient operations for all modes of transportation. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and study findings offered for consideration. Existing Conditions Existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline to identify any potential issues and opportunities, as well as determine improvement alternatives. The evaluation of existing conditions includes a review of traffic volumes, current travel patterns, and existing utilization and compliance of the tunnel one-way functions, which are summarized in the following sections. Data Collection Weekday and weekend 24-hour vehicular turning movement were collected by SRF during the weeks of August 4th and August 11th, at the following study intersections along Main Street: •Main Street and Village at Mendota Heights West Tunnel •Main Street and Village at Mendota Heights East Tunnel Page 69 of 109 NORTHNorth02519569 August 2025 Existing Conditions Figure 1Mendota Heights Site Review City of Mendota Heights Main Str e et Market Street Lind e n St Average Daily Volume: 12 Max Hourly Volume: 3 Average Daily Volume: 70 Max Hourly Volume: 11 Project Location Kar l Hohens te in P l Page 70 of 109 Mendota Heights Site Review August 25, 2025 Page 3 of 6 Existing Site Circulation The site features two (2) existing tunnels that currently serve as one-way connections between the parking lot to the north and Main Street to the south. Existing signage and pavement markings are in place to support and reinforce the one-way configurations. •The west tunnel is currently configured as a one-way road in the southbound direction. Vehicles exit the tunnel at a T-intersection with Main Street, which is a two-way roadway. Note, this tunnel used to have a drive-thru window for a pharmacy in the southbound direction. •The east tunnel currently operates as a one-way road in the northbound direction, providing access from Main Street to the northern parking lot. The tunnel aligns with the one-way driveway to the south, ensuring a consistent and coordinated traffic flow. Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes in the tunnels were used to evaluate usage, direction compliance, and any other potential concerns. Existing volumes are summarized below in Table 1: Table 1 Existing Tunnel Volumes – The Village at Mendota Heights Tunnel Weekday Daily Volume Weekend Daily Volume Maximum Hourly Volume Total Wrong-Way movements West Tunnel 15 9 3 1 East Tunnel 81 59 11 2 The west tunnel currently experiences significantly lower usage compared to the east tunnel, with an average of 12 vehicles per day and a maximum hourly volume of three (3) vehicles. While instances of wrong-way driving were observed at both tunnels, overall compliance was high. Over a 48-hour period, one (1) wrong-way vehicle was recorded in the west tunnel and two (2) were observed at the east tunnel. Proposed Development The proposed Happy Joe’s Pizza and Ice Cream development is planned for the westernmost portion of the building, extending to the west tunnel. A pick-up window is proposed to be installed within the tunnel, allowing customers to pick up pre-ordered pizzas. Note, this window is NOT intended to be an order window for drive-thru traffic and there is not ordering board, it is pick up window only of orders that are ready. To accommodate this feature, the one-way traffic flow of the tunnel would need to be reversed, enabling vehicles to approach the pick-up window on the driver’s side. Note, the tunnel pavement width is wide enough (approximately 16 to 18 feet) to allow for a vehicle to pass, if necessary. Page 71 of 109 Mendota Heights Site Review August 25, 2025 Page 4 of 6 Recommendations After analysis of the data collected as part of the study the following improvements are recommended and can be seen in Figure 2 below: •Based on the minimal existing volumes at the west tunnel, reversing the direction of traffic flow in the west tunnel from the existing southbound one-way configuration to a northbound one-way configuration, would pose minimal operational or safety issues in the study area. o To accommodate a drive-thru, the sidewalk/curb on the west side of the tunnel will need to be shrunk to allow vehicles to get close enough to the pick up window (see below). •It is recommended that the direction of traffic flow in the east tunnel remain northbound to minimize changes to the site layout. The east tunnel currently experiences higher traffic volumes, and reversing its direction could lead to driver confusion and potential safety concerns, especially given that the driveway south of the tunnel is already configured for northbound one-way traffic. •Given the low existing traffic volumes through the west tunnel (averaging 12 vehicles per day), impacts to overall traffic flow are expected to be minimal. Vehicles affected by the change will be able to utilize either Market Street to the west or Karl Hohenstein Place to the east, to route to Main Street or to head off the site. Pick Up Window Page 72 of 109 Mendota Heights Site Review August 25, 2025 Page 5 of 6 •No queuing concerns are anticipated at the proposed pickup window during peak times, as the window is designated solely for order pickup and not for placing orders. Note, the roadway width within the tunnel is wide enough to allow for a vehicle to pass, if necessary. •To ensure a smooth transition and minimize driver confusion, temporary installation of bold signage is recommended at the tunnel access points to clearly communicate the change in traffic direction. This signage should remain in place for six (6) months to one (1) year, allowing drivers time to adjust to the new layout. After this period, more subtle, permanent signage, similar to what currently exists, should be sufficient. •Updated pavement markings, including directional arrows, are also recommended to reinforce the new traffic flow. Page 73 of 109 NORTHNorth02519569 August 2025 Recommended Layout Figure 2Happy Joe’s Pizza & Ice Cream Site Review City of Mendota Heights Main Str e et Market Street Lind e n St -Tunnel Lane -Alternative Route - Study Area LEGEND Happy Joe’s Pizza & Ice Cream East tunnel will remain a southbound one-way roadway Proposed Pick-Up Window Temporary Signage Existing Permanent Overhead “Do Not Enter” and “Drive Thru” signs should be flipped at the West Tunnel to match the new tunnel one-way operation Page 74 of 109 This page is intentionally left blank 9.b REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-56 Supporting Removal of the Dorset Road Connection to Delaware Avenue and Construction of a Cul-De-Sac Along Dorset Road ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Assistant City Engineer ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-56 Supporting Removal of the Dorset Road Connection to Delaware Avenue and Construction of a Cul-De-Sac Along Dorset Road. BACKGROUND: Dakota County, in partnership with the Cities of Mendota Heights and West St. Paul, is planning to reconstruct Delaware Avenue in 2027 between Marie Avenue and Dodd Road. As part of this project, the City has evaluated the Dorset Road intersection. Currently, the Dorset Road approach to Delaware Avenue has a slope that exceeds the City’s maximum allowable roadway grade of 6%. This condition presents long-term safety and maintenance concerns. The County project provides an opportunity to address this issue. In June 2025, City staff sent letters to impacted residents along Dorset Road and Mears Avenue seeking feedback on a potential modification to the intersection. The proposed modification would remove the existing connection of Dorset Road to Delaware Avenue and replace it with a cul-de-sac, bringing Dorset Road into compliance with City roadway standards for maximum grade. A trail connection between the cul-de-sac and the future Delaware Avenue multi-use trail is also being considered. The City received considerable feedback from the letter, with residents expressing both support for and opposition to the removal of the Dorset Road and Delaware Avenue intersection. Alternatively, the intersection could remain in place with reconstruction of approximately 185 feet of Dorset Road to reduce the roadway grade. However, the roadway grade would still exceed the City’s maximum standard for a public roadway. Roadway grades are permitted to exceed the City’s maximum where adjacent topography warrants, as determined and recommended by the City Engineer. There are warranted roadways within the City that currently exceed allowable grades due to existing topography of which will continue to be Page 75 of 109 evaluated as reconstruction and design opportunities present themselves. On August 26, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public meeting and heard additional comments from residents. All residents who spoke at the meeting expressed support for removal of the intersection. Following the public comment period, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend removal of the intersection and construction of a cul-de- sac. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: None at this time. The City’s share of project costs will be funded through Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds, regardless of which intersection alternative is recommended. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-56 Supporting Removal of the Dorset Road Connection to Delaware Avenue and Construction of a Cul-De-Sac Along Dorset Road 2.Dorset Road Cul-de-Sac Concept CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Premier Public Services & Infrastructure Page 76 of 109 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-56 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REMOVAL OF THE DORSET ROAD CONNECTION TO DELAWARE AVENUE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A CUL-DE-SAC ALONG DORSET ROAD WHEREAS, Dakota County began a CSAH 63 Reconstruction Project in 2025, and intends to continue in 2026 and 2027; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights intends to participate in costs associated with the project in accordance with City Council approved Cost Sharing Agreements; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights Capital Improvement Plan shows adequate cost share funding for the CSAH 63 Reconstruction Project in 2025, 2026 and 2027; and WHEREAS, the existing roadway grade of Dorset Road approaching Delaware Avenue exceeds the City of Mendota Heights’ maximum allowable slope for roadways; and WHEREAS, the removal of the existing Dorset Road and Delaware Avenue intersection in the City of Mendota Heights is in the best interest of public safety and shall be replaced with a Cul-de-Sac constructed on Dorset Road; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota supports the efforts of Dakota County to remove the Dorset Road connection to Delaware Avenue, construct a cul-de-sac on Dorset Road, and improve public safety through the CSAH 63 Reconstruction Project. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of September, 2025. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor _________________________ Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 77 of 109 Page 78 of 109 9.c REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: September 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2025-57 Approving a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane (Planning Case 2025-12) ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business DEPARTMENT: Community Development CONTACT: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager ACTION REQUEST: Adopt Resolution 2025-57 Approving a MRCCA Permit for M&M Home Contractors to allow for the construction of a new single-family home at the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane BACKGROUND: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owner’s Representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. The site is located on the west side of Hunter Lane and generally southeast of Sibley Memorial Highway and adjacent wooded vacant lots. The property is located within the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA), and therefore the construction of a new single-family home requires a MRCCA permit. The existing lot is vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home, demolished in 2023. The proposed project is to construct a new 8,907 sq-ft home on the property, generally located centrally on the lot and consistent with neighboring existing homes and the prior constructed home. The proposed improvements are located outside of the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) and bluff setback, located at the rear of the property. The applicant is also proposing to construct two rock infiltration trenches on site; one at the rear of the property, and one north of the existing driveway in the front yard. A full landscape plan has been provided, which illustrates two new overstory trees planted in the front yard, consistent with zoning requirements, as well as foundation plantings and perennials surrounding the new home. At the July 22, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, a planning report was presented. A duly noticed public hearing was opened and three members of the public spoke to the application. The Commission discussed the landscaping improvements on site, and requested additional information from the applicant. The public hearing was tabled while open, and at the August Page 79 of 109 26, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, the public hearing was held where one resident spoke for the application, and then closed after providing the opportunity for any interested parties to speak. The applicant was present at the August 26 meeting and available to answer questions of the Commission. The Commission discussed the revised landscaping plan and thanked the applicant for providing additional details. There was also discussion on the distance of the improvements from the BIZ and other Primary Conservation Areas (PCA). A copy of the 08/26/25 planning report with attachments and an excerpt from the unapproved minutes are attached to this memo. As noted in the attachment, staff recommended approval of the application request. Following their discussion, the Planning Commission affirmed the staff recommendation and voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend to the City Council approval of this MRCCA Permit with findings-of-fact and certain conditions, as outlined in the attached [draft] Resolution. FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 2025-57 Approving a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane (Planning Case 2025-12) 2.Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes 8-26-25 3.August 26, 2025, Planning Commission Staff Report CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY: Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Environmental Sustainability & Stewardship Page 80 of 109 Resolution No. 2025-57 Page | 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2025-57 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA (MRCCA) PERMIT TO M&M HOME CONTRACTORS AND FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1867 HUNTER LANE PLANNING CASE 2025-12 WHEREAS, M&M Home Contractors, (the “Applicant”) made an Application for a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to allow for a new single-family home and associated site improvements, located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and legally described in Exhibit A (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided LDR-Low Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, and is situated in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Title 12-6A-3: Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District, a permit is required to approve any new development activities involving a building permit, land disturbance, vegetation removal, or special zoning approval, and the Applicant is seeking permission to make site improvements under the rules and standards established by the R-1 District and the related Mississippi River Corridor Critical Overlay District ordinance and standards; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission opened a public hearing on the proposed MRCCA Permit, and through their discussion voted 7-0 to table the application with the public hearing open, to request additional information and plans from the applicant to be reviewed and discussed at the next meeting; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 2025, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission continued the tabled public hearing on the proposed MRCCA Permit, and whereupon closing the hearing, recommended 6-0 to approve the MRCCA Permit, which would allow the site improvements on the subject property, with certain conditions and findings-of-fact to support said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that the recommendation from the Planning Commission on Planning Case No. 2025-12 is hereby affirmed, and may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact: 1.The proposed construction of a new single family home and associated improvements meets the general purpose and intent of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Separated from River Overlay District. Page 81 of 109 Resolution No. 2025-57 Page | 2 2.The proposed work and disturbance to construct the new home and associated improvements are low-intensity with no anticipated impact to Primary Conservation Areas within the MRCCA Plan, and the project includes restoration of the area once developed with sod cover and native trees. The proposed project is within the spirit and intent of the MRCCA Separated from River Overlay District that provides for flexibility within the management purpose. 3.The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 4.The construction of the home is shown in the plan to comply with all standards and regulations of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District and Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances; represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single-family development pattern of the neighborhood. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that the MRCCA Permit requested for the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane is hereby approved, with the following conditions: 1.A building permit, including a grading plan, must be approved by the City prior to the commencement of any site work. 2.The proposed project must comply with all requirements of the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 3.All erosion control requirements must be put in place prior to the commencement of any grading and site work activities. Such measures must remain in place for the duration of the construction activities until proper site restoration plans are completed. 4.All grading and construction activity must comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes. 5.All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekends. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd day of September 2025. Page 82 of 109 Resolution No. 2025-57 Page | 3 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ________________________________ Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk Page 83 of 109 Resolution No. 2025-57 Page | 4 EXHIBIT A Address: 1867 Hunter Lane PIN: 27-18200-00-040 Legal Description: Real property in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows: The North 90 feet of Lot 4 in Colliton Place, except: Commencing on the South line of the tract above described at a point 316 feet West of the Easterly line thereof which is the point of beginning of the description of the tract to be excepted from the above conveyance; thence running Westerly along said South line of said tract to the Westerly line of said Lot 4; thence running Northerly along the Westerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 26.55 feet to a point; thence running in a Southeasterly direction to the point of beginning, Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Page 84 of 109 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES EXCERPT FROM DRAFT/UNAPPROVED 8/26/25 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES A) TABLED PLANNING CASE 2025-12 M&M HOME CONTRACTORS, 1867 HUNTER LANE – MRCCA PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that M&M Home Contractors is the applicant and owner’s representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. A duly noticed public hearing was opened at the July 22nd Planning Commission meeting. Two residents representing one household spoke in favor of the proposal, and one resident spoke inquiring about tree removal and any plans for additional utility work for the construction of the home. City staff have received one written comment related to this item, which was included in the staff report. During discussion of the application, the Commission expressed concerns with the available details on the proposed landscaping for the new home site and requested additional information from the applicant. The applicant was unable to attend the July 22nd meeting, but has provided updated landscaping plans and details, which were included in the packet. An updated survey was also provided, illustrating the location of existing trees on the property. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350 feet of the site; one written comment was received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson referenced a comment made at the last meeting related to a potential intermittent stream and asked if there was any information on that. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that there is no confirmation of the existence of the intermittent stream. She noted that this is one parcel of three owned by the same property owner, so the stream could be located on an adjacent property if it does exist. Commissioner Johnson asked if the rate of stormwater flow had been reviewed. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that the rates are not factored in for the single- family home construction, and a measure of abstraction is required, and noted that this request meets that requirement. Commissioner Johnson referenced the primary conservation area on the western edge of the property and asked staff to identify that area. Page 85 of 109 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided additional details on the forested area of the bluff that is considered to be the existing vegetative stand on the edge of the property. She highlighted the bluff impact zone (BIZ) and confirmed that the vegetative stand is within the BIZ. Acting Chair Stone commented that the public hearing from the last meeting was tabled and, therefore, is still open and invited comments from the public. The applicant confirmed that he is available to answer any questions. Commissioner Johnson thanked the applicant for updating and providing more detailed information, noting that because this is an MRCCA permit, there are more requirements. Theresa Cosgriff, 1875 Hunter Lane, noted that she and her husband submitted a written comment to the Mayor on this topic. She noted that this lot has sat vacant for many years in rough condition. She stated that the neighborhood has been updating, and people have been reinvesting in their properties, and she believed that the new home would assist in that vision for the neighborhood. She stated that she and her husband built their home five years ago and enjoyed the flexibility of working with the Planning Commission and City Council, and asked that this applicant be provided with the same flexibility. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Stone asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Johnson commented that it seems the existing bituminous drive is going to be kept and expanded. She asked for more information on the material that would be used for the expanded portion of the driveway. Mike Fritz, applicant, commented that the decision on that material has not yet been made. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MRCCA-CRITICAL AREA PERMIT REQUEST FOR 1867 HUNTER LANE, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A BUILDING PERMIT, INCLUDING A GRADING PLAN, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE WORK. 2. THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. ALL PLANS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. Page 86 of 109 DRAFT/UNAPPROVED MINUTES 3.ALL EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY GRADING AND SITE WORK ACTIVITIES. SUCH MEASURES MUST REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL PROPER SITE RESTORATION PLANS ARE COMPLETED. 4. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. 5. ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. WEEKENDS. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Acting Chair Stone advised the City Council would consider this application at its September 2, 2025, meeting. Page 87 of 109 4.a Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 26, 2025 Agenda Item: Tabled - CASE No. 2025-12 MRCCA Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit at 1867 Hunter Lane Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owner’s Representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. A duly noticed public hearing was opened at the July 22, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. Two residents representing one household spoke in favor of the proposal, and one resident spoke inquiring about tree removal, and any plans for additional utility work for the construction of the home. City staff has received one written comment related to this item as of the submittal of this report which is attached. During discussion of the application, the Commission expressed concerns with the available details on proposed landscaping for the new home site, and requested additional information from the applicant. The applicant was unable to attend the July 22nd meeting and verbally address the Commission's questions and the comments which arose from residents attending the public hearing, leading to the Commission voting to Table the application. The applicant has provided updated landscaping plans and details which are included as an attachment to this report. An updated survey has also been provided illustrating the location of existing trees on the property. As the application was tabled while the public hearing was open, the public hearing will continue at this meeting to allow any interested parties to speak to the application. Background: The subject property is located on the west side of Hunter Lane and generally southeast of Sibley Memorial Highway and adjacent wooded vacant lots. The total area of this property is 2.25 acres and contains three parcels owned in common, however this application's impact area includes the addressed property of 1867 Hunter Lane, an R-1 zoned property .92 acres in size. The subject property is part of the Colliton Place subdivision, and is currently vacant as the prior home was demolished in 2023. The prior home was accessed from a long driveway that remains in place today with access from Hunter Lane to a point generally centrally located within the lot. There is also a portion of the neighboring driveway to the north which is located on this parcel and which is subject to a Page 88 of 109 driveway easement agreement. The subject property is located within the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA), and therefore the construction of a new single-family home requires a MRCCA permit. Analysis: The existing lot is vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home. The proposed project is to construct a new 8,907 sq-ft home on the property, generally located centrally on the lot and with deep setbacks consistent with neighboring existing homes and the prior constructed home. The proposed home will be accessed by a reconstruction of the existing driveway, with a proposed circle drive closer to the new home. The proposed improvements are located outside of the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) and bluff setback, located at the rear of the property. The applicant is also proposing to construct two rock infiltration trenches on site; one at the rear of the property, and one north of the existing driveway in the front yard. The applicant has also indicated that they will be planting two new overstory trees in the front yard, consistent with zoning requirements. The proposed site plan, and layout of the home is consistent with the base requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets minimum setback requirements for the R-1 zoning district, and 21.5% of the site would be covered by impervious surface, meeting the City's zoning requirements. 5.MRCCA Critical Area Permit Per Title 12, Chapter 6 Critical Area Overlay District a Critical Area Permit is required for the subject project. The following summary of the site is provided as reference: Standard Subject Property Conditions MRCCA Sub District Separated from River Bluff on Site? Yes, at the rear of the property Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) Yes, the Bluff Impact Zone crosses the west line of the lot, approximately 40-ft into the rear yard of the property. The proposed home is setback 102-ft from the BIZ. Significant Vegetative Stands or Primary Conservation Area (PCA) No. The proposed home is located more than 100-feet from any PCA or significant vegetation. The proposed rock infiltration garden is located 10-ft from the BIZ, and approximately 40-ft from the nearest significant existing vegetative stand. Subject to Section 12-6A-9 Vegetation Management No, does not meet criteria as no significant vegetative removal required as part of the proposed improvements. Subject to Section 12-6A-11 Land Alteration Standards and Stormwater Management Yes. A new home construction is permitted but stormwater must be diverted from any BIZ area. The demolition and new construction are both subject to the Land Alteration and Stormwater standards. Subject to Section 12-6A-12 Site Plan Yes. Must include Site Plan and Page 89 of 109 Requirements Landscape Plan As described in Section 12-6A-4 C.3., the Separated from River (SR) sub-district describes the management purpose as, “...provides flexibility in managing development without negatively affecting the key resources and features of the river corridor. Minimizing negative impacts to primary conservation areas and minimizing erosion and the flow of untreated storm water into the river are priorities…” As indicated on the attached GIS maps, the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) crosses and covers the far western end of the site, within the first 40-ft of the rear yard. As shown on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, the applicant will construct a new single-family home and seed/sod the entirety of the site, install two rock infiltration trenches, add additional circle drive immediately in front of the home, and plant two new overstory trees. As proposed, the new home will be setback approximately 102-ft from the BIZ boundary, with the proposed rear deck approximately 78-ft from the BIZ. There is an additional Primary Conservation Areas on the site, as the nearest significant vegetative stands are located directly west of the property in the large vacant wooded hillside. The attached MRCCA Map illustrates the boundary of a Significant Existing Vegetative Stand of Midwestern White Oak – Red Oak Forest, which crosses the rear of the property approximately 10-ft in, and more than 100-ft from the proposed new home. The infiltration area in the rear yard is outside of all Primary Conservation Areas, and has been proposed to comply with the City’s stormwater and land disturbance requirements which are requirements of the Building Permit process. Per Code Sect. 12-6A-12, the Detailed Site Plan must be drawn to scale and the proposed project accurately described through narrative and supporting maps and/or plans. The plan set for the new home is attached to this report, and the Site Survey and Landscaping Plan are included. The proposed new home location is sited on a relatively flat area of the lot, consistent with the prior home on site, and there are no significant grades. As noted on the attached plans, there are retaining walls proposed north of the new home, and west of the rear of the home in areas where a change in grade is present. Restoration of the site once the construction is complete is planned and described as sodded and irrigated. The Applicant provided a revised Landscape Plan, dated 8/7/25, which illustrates that there are 15 trees preserved on site, three new trees proposed to be planted, and a number of foundation plantings including native, ornamental, and pollinator-attracting perennials as well as shrubs. Interagency Review Under the MRCCA Ordinance, the city is required to submit the MRRCA permit request to the MnDNR and the National Park Service (NPS). The plan set and project information was transmitted to both agencies for their review and comment. At the time of this report the NPS has responded noting that they have no comments, but no correspondence has been received from MnDNR. Staff will provide a verbal update of their correspondence at the Planning Commission meeting. Alternatives: 1.Approve the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, which would allow for the construction of a new single-family home and associated improvements based on the findings-of-fact that the proposed project is compliant with the policies and standards of the MRCCA Overlay District and City Zoning Code standards, with certain conditions; or 2.Deny the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, based on the Page 90 of 109 revised or amended findings-of-fact that the application does not meet certain policies and standards of City Code as determined by the Planning Commission; or 3.Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant; Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota State Statute 15.99. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, with the following conditions: 1. A building permit, including a grading plan, must be approved by the City prior to the commencement of any site work. 2. The proposed project must comply with all requirements of the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 3. All erosion control requirements must be put in place prior to the commencement of any grading and site work activities. Such measures must remain in place for the duration of the construction activities until proper site restoration plans are completed. 4. All grading and construction activity must comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes. 5. All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekends. Attachments: 1.Findings of Fact for Approval 2.Site Location Map 3.MRCCA Map 4.Letter of Intent 5.1867 Hunter Lane Survey (Dated 8/8/25) 6.1867 Hunter Lane Landscape Plan (Dated 8/7/25) 7.Construction Plans - Cover Sheet 8.A1 - Front Elevation 9.A2 - Left Elevation 10.A3 - Rear Elevation 11.A5 - Right Elevation 12.A6 - Foundation Plan 13.Letter of Support from John and Theresa Cosgriff for CASE No. 2025-12 - MRCCA Permit Page 91 of 109 Planning Case 2025-12 (MRCCA Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane) Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL MRCAA -Critical Area Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed construction of a new single family home and associated improvements meets the general purpose and intent of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Separated from River Overlay District. 2. The proposed work and disturbance to construct the new home and associated improvements are low-intensity with no anticipated impact to Primary Conservation Areas within the MRCCA Plan, and the project includes restoration of the area once developed with sod cover and native trees. The proposed project is within the spirit and intent of the MRCCA Separated from River Overlay District that provides for flexibility within the management purpose. 3. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The construction of the home is shown in the plan to comply with all standards and regulations of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District and Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances; represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single- family development pattern of the neighborhood. Page 92 of 109 6666666 6666666 66666666666666666666666666! "" ³³³³! ³ ³ ³ ³ ³³" """ " " "" "³³ ³³" ³* ³ ³³ ³ ³³** * ³ * ! ³ * **6666666666666 6 FMFMFMFMFMFMFM 6 6 6 66 66666!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 1885 1253 1889 1875 1881 1860 1880 1890 1870 1850 1254 1819 1845 1855 1867 1154 1827 1903 1175 1840 1833 1901 1247 1905 1831 1885 1907 1835 1911 1830 1836 1902 1838 1235 1908 1908 1914 1151 1916 1841 1851 1859 1865 1871 1875 1199 118712051921 11551171 1145 1242 1892 1919 1838 1248 1145 1920 1840 1230 HUNTER LNORCHARD PL SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYHUNTER CT ORCHARD CIRGLENHILL RDNearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial Map1867 Hunter Lane Date: 7/18/2025 City ofMendotaHeights0210 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 93 of 109 Page 94 of 109 Page 95 of 109 Page 96 of 109 Page 97 of 109 Page 98 of 109 L-101FOREST MITIGATIONPLAN..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - Lucius\Signature.jpgDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 08/07/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-100 Forest Mitigation Plan.dwgISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:8/7/2025 6:51:38 PMSUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANEHOUSE BUILD1867 HUNTER LANEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM08/07/20250206/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL0108/07/2025 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL02CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FOREST MITIGATION NOTES1. Significant tree means a healthy tree measuring a minimum of six inches in diameter fordeciduous trees, 10 feet in height for conifer trees, and is not considered hazardous.2. Heritage tree means a tree of any native species or cultivar of a native species that is 24 inchesin diameter or greater, excluding invasive species.3. The applicant shall post a tree replacement escrow with the City. For every heritage treepreserved on site, the escrow may be reduced by $250.00.4. If seven (7) or more total significant or heritage trees on the property are removed, theapplicant shall mitigate all significant and heritage tree inches measured at DBH at a rate of75%. Example: 84 DBH inches removed x .75 = 63 DBH inches required to be replaced.5. Trees shall not be planted within 10 feet of property lines without written permission of theaffected adjacent property, nor shall trees be planted at lot corners in a way that obstructs adriver's line of sight. If compliance with the tree replacement requirement is not feasible, theCity may approve alternative tree replacement measures, including the planting of trees at analternate site. The alternate site must be public land, and at the choice of the city. The city mayrequire post-construction tree care.6. In order to preserve diversity and provide protection from tree disease and pests; where ten ormore replacement trees are required, not more than 20 percent shall be of the same family, notmore than 10 percent of the same genus, and not more than 5 percent of the same species,unless approved by the City. Tree species of the genus Acer shall be limited to 10 percent oftotal replacement trees planted, due to its over-abundance in the City's forest canopy. Aminimum of 50 percent of replacement trees must be species native to Minnesota orrecommended by the Department of Natural Resources or University of Minnesota Extension.7. When replacement trees are required, replacement trees shall be no less than a one-caliperinch deciduous or six-foot height conifer tree unless approved by the City. No more than threeconsecutive trees of the same species may be planted in a continuous row, including aroundcorners and in groupings.FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN1. Contact responsible for tree preservation during the course of the project:Mike Fritz413 Paul Ave SCologne, MN 55322(612) 554-25562. Tree replacement escrow reduction = 4 heritage trees preserved x $250 = $1,0003. No existing trees are being removed, therefore a replacement landscape plan fortrees has not been prepared.Page 99 of 109 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXHUNTER LANE90'(1) SWO(1) SWOROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHDRIVEWAY EASEMENT(1) BCPL-103116117118121120119122112108109110111101102103113115114107105106104ALL EXISTING TREES IN FRONT YARDTO BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED.EXISTING TREE CANOPY LINE.L-102LANDSCAPE PLANDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 08/07/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-102.dwgISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:8/7/2025 6:51:42 PMSUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANEHOUSE BUILD1867 HUNTER LANEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM08/07/20250206/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL0108/07/2025 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL02GROUND COVER LEGENDPLANT LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEDENOTES AREA TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED.TOTAL AREA (0.3 AC)TREE SCHEDULESYMBOL QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAMESIZESPACING O.C MATURE DIMENSIONSOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREESSWO 2Swamp White Oak / Quercus bicolor2.5" BBAS SHOWN H 50'-60' W 40'PLANTING NOTES1. PRIOR TO TREE STAKING AND PLANTING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONECALL (WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.COM OR 811) TO VERIFY UNDERGROUD UTILITIES. WHERE PRIVATEUTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THOSE LOCATED AS WELL.2. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK: ANSI Z60.1 LATEST EDITION.HTTP://AMERICANHORT.ORG/DOCUMENTS/ANSI NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS AMERICANHORT 2014.PDF3. NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CITY.4. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE FIELD REVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY TREE PROTECTION INSTALLATION.5. ALL TREE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIELDREVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOANY TREE INSTALLATION.6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE. NO PLANT MATERIAL IS TOBE LEFT OVERNIGHT ON THE PROJECT SITE WITHOUT BEING INSTALLED UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL BYCITY.7. IRRIGATION DESIGN TO COVER ALL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN AS IRRIGATED TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRGIATIONCONTRACTOR .8. PLANTING BEDS SHALL GET 3 INCHES OF 1 12 INCH DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSTOTAL PROJECT MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENTS 2 TREESSEC 12-4B-2 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED BUILDING REQUIREMENTS:2 TREES3.a NEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING TEARDOWN AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE_FAMILY DETACHED ORATTACHED STRUCTURES ARE REQUIRED TO PLANT A MINIMUM OF ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREEPER 50-FEET OF LINEAL FRONTAGE OF PUBLIC STREET.SEC 15-3-2 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 TREESNO TREE REMOVALS PROPOSED.NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.1. ALL LOTS MUST BE PLANTED WITH AN ACCEPTABLE GROUND COVER WHICH SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTEDWITH A NATIVE GROUND COVER.2. ALL NEW OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BE 2.5" CALIPER BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES.WB 1 Whitespire Birch/Betula Clump Populifolia 'White Spire' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN H 40'-45' W 30'EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREENEW OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREENEW HERBACEOUS PLANT1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE MULCHEDWITH 1 12" DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.Page 100 of 109 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHROCK MULCHMAINTENANCESTRIP(6) SH(6) SH(18) CA(1) BCP(2) HA(4) HA(2) HA(3) TO(3) TO(3) TO(3) HJ(3) HJ(3) CA(6) SH(4) NF(18) NF(18) SS(4) NF(7) CA(4) CAL-103121120122112108109113115114L-103LANDSCAPE PLANDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 08/07/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-102.dwgISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:8/7/2025 6:51:48 PMSUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANEHOUSE BUILD1867 HUNTER LANEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM08/07/20250206/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL0108/07/2025 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL02PLANT LEGENDPLANT SCHEDULESYMBOL QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAMESIZESPACING O.C MATURE DIMENSIONSHERBACEOUS PLANTSNOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.NF 26 Walkers Low Catmint/Nepata Faassenii #1 ContainerAS SHOWN 30"SS 18 Little Bluestem/Schizachyrium scoparium #1 ContainerAS SHOWN 24"SH 12 Prarie Dropseed/Sporobolus heterolepis #3 ContainerAS SHOWN 24"CA 36 Karl Foerster/Calamagrostis acutiflora #3 ContainerAS SHOWN 30"HA 8Annabele Hydrangea/Hydrangea arborescens #3 ContainerAS SHOWN 5'HJ 6June Hosta/Hosta June #1 ContainerAS SHOWN 3'TO 9Little Arborvitae/Thuja occidentalis #5 ContainerAS SHOWN 5'GROUND COVER LEGEND1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. FOUNDATION PLANTINGS TO BE MULCHEDWITH 1 12" DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREEDENOTES AREA TO BE SODDED AND IRRIGATED.TOTAL AREA (0.3 AC)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREENEW OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREENEW HERBACEOUS PLANTPLANTING NOTES1. PRIOR TO TREE STAKING AND PLANTING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONECALL (WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.COM OR 811) TO VERIFY UNDERGROUD UTILITIES. WHERE PRIVATEUTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THOSE LOCATED AS WELL.2. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK: ANSI Z60.1 LATEST EDITION.HTTP://AMERICANHORT.ORG/DOCUMENTS/ANSI NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS AMERICANHORT 2014.PDF3. NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CITY.4. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE FIELD REVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY TREE PROTECTION INSTALLATION.5. ALL TREE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIELDREVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOANY TREE INSTALLATION.6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE. NO PLANT MATERIAL IS TOBE LEFT OVERNIGHT ON THE PROJECT SITE WITHOUT BEING INSTALLED UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL BYCITY.7. IRRIGATION DESIGN TO COVER ALL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN AS IRRIGATED TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRGIATIONCONTRACTOR .8. PLANTING BEDS SHALL GET 3 INCHES OF 1 12 INCH DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH.LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSTOTAL PROJECT MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENTS 2 TREESSEC 12-4B-2 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED BUILDING REQUIREMENTS:2 TREES3.a NEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING TEARDOWN AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE_FAMILY DETACHED ORATTACHED STRUCTURES ARE REQUIRED TO PLANT A MINIMUM OF ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREEPER 50-FEET OF LINEAL FRONTAGE OF PUBLIC STREET.SEC 15-3-2 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 TREESNO TREE REMOVALS PROPOSED.1. ALL LOTS MUST BE PLANTED WITH AN ACCEPTABLE GROUND COVER WHICH SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTEDWITH A NATIVE GROUND COVER.2. ALL NEW OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BE 2.5" CALIPER BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES. Page 101 of 109 PRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHCONTAINER GROWN MATERIALS SHALL HAVE ROOTS HANDS LOOSENEDUPON PLANTING; PRUNE ANY DEAD OR DESICCATED ROOTSBACKFILL AROUND ROOTS WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.HOLE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED SUCH THAT ROOTS ARE VERTICAL ANDFULLY EXTENDED. SCARIFY BOTTOM OF PIT (6 IN. MIN.)SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE2 SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAILL-101 NOT TO SCALE3 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAILDRIP LINE OF TREE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE4 TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL4' HIGH SAFETY FENCE ATTACHED TO STEEL POSTS ATDRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED.SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLAN2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.18"4'L-104LANDSCAPE DETAILSDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 08/07/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-104.dwgISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:8/7/2025 6:51:45 PMSUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANEHOUSE BUILD1867 HUNTER LANEMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM08/07/20250206/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL0108/07/2025 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL02Page 102 of 109 F.D.RADON -UPUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGWOOD10'X10'STAIRCASEFEATURESFURNACEWATER HEATERSUMP BASKETFLOOR DRAINWASHERDRYERLAUNDRY SINKFIREPLACESINKDISHWASHERREFRIGERATORVANITY/SINKTOILETSHOWERTUB/SHOWERUNITDOORWINDOWCLOSETSHELVINGSUPPORTPOSTSTRUCTURALBEAMSTAIRCASEINFORMATIONROOMNAMEATTIC ACCESSNOTE: KEY SHOWS INFORMATION/DETAILS THAT ARE NOT TYPICALLYNOTED, REFER TO PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/DETAILSSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG.3190 SQ.FTUNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 147 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 3337 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG.2318 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 1195 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3513 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2057 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:7565 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 8907 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25SHEET INDEX::::C COVERA1 FRONT ELEVATIONA2 LEFT ELEVATIONA3 REAR ELEVATIONA4 RIGHT ELEVATIONA5 ROOF PLANA6 FOUNDATION PLANA7 FINISHED BASEMENT PLANA8 FIRST FLOOR PLANSA9 SECOND FLOOR PLAND1 BUILDING SECTIONSD2 BUILDING SECTIOND3 BUILDING SECTIOND4 BUILDING SECTIOND5 DETAILSD6 DETAILSR1 RADON DETAILSS1 BASEMENT WALL BRACINGS2 1ST FLOOR BRACINGS3 2ND FLOOR BRACING & DETAILS1. ALL CEILINGS ARE TO HAVE 5/8" NON-SAGGYPSUM BOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS ARE TO HAVE 12" GYPSUMBOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. GARAGE CEILING AND WALLS THAT ADJOINHOUSE WALLS ARE TO BE 58" GYPSUMBOARD PER CODE.1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE DOUBLE PANEGLASS PANELS WITH LOW-E RATINGS.2. ANY WINDOW WITHIN 24" OF A DOOR SWING MUSTBE TEMPERED PER CODE.3. ANY WINDOW ABOVE A TUB/WET AREA MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.4. ANY WINDOW WITHIN A STAIRWAY MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.5. WINDOW GLAZING MUST BE AT LEAST 18" A.F.F.WHEN WINDOW IS ABOVE 6' FROM GRADE. IF WITHIN18", WINDOW MUST BE TEMPERED.6. ALL BEDROOMS TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE WINDOWTHAT HAS A CLEAR EGRESS OPENING OF 5.7 SQ. FT.WITH MIN. DIMENSIONS OF 24" IN HEIGHT AND 20"IN WIDTH, SILL HEIGHT NOT TO BE GREATER THAN 44"A.F.F.7. WINDOWS WITH SILLS WITHIN 3' OF THE FLOORTHEY SERVE AND ARE 72" ABOVE GRADE MUST EITHERHAVE A FALL PREVENTION OR OPENING LIMITERDEVICE PER CODE.1. ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TOBE VERIFIED AND INSTALLED PER CODE BY APPROVEDTRADES AND INSTALLERS.2. HVAC CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LAYOUT FORDUCT-RUNS BEFORE INSTALLATION, IF MODIFICATIONIS REQUIRED, REPORT INFORMATION/CHANGES TOCONTRACTOR & LITTFIN DESIGN.1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 16" O.C. WITH ADOUBLE TOP PLATE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. WALL FRAMING SHALL BE S.P.F. STUD GRADE ORBETTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (U.N.O.)3. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE PER PLAN4. ALL EXTERIOR HEADERS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 BEARING STUD & (1) 2X6 FULL HEIGHT KINGSTUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O. (REVIEW PLANS)5. ALL INTERNAL HEADERS & BEAMS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 OR (1)2X4 BEARING STUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O.6. EXTERIOR SHEATHING SHALL BE 7/16" MATERIALCONSISTING OF ORIENTED STRAND BOARD (OSB).-ALLFLOOR AND CEILING SYSTEMS TO BE CHECKED ANDDESIGNED BY THE DESIGNATED MANUFACTURER.FLOOR PLANS TO BE ON SITE.7. HEADER SIZES ARE TO BE USED PERPLAN AND DEVIATION FROM ANY SIZE MUST BEAPPROVED BY DESIGNERS.8. PRESSURE TREADED WOOD IS TO BE USED WHEREWOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE AND AT 2X6MUD SILL. TREATED MEMBERS TO BE S.Y.P.#2 ORBETTER.9. FOR OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS (OR WALLS W/LATERAL LOADING:a. 0'-0" - 4'-0"= 1 JACK STUDb. 4'-0" - 8'-0"= 2 JACK STUDSc. 8'-0" - 12'-0" = 3 JACK STUDSd. GREATER THAN 12' = CONSULT ENG.10. POSTS CALLED OUT ARE NUMBER OFTRIMMER/JACK STUDS REQUIRED PER SIDE OFOPENING.1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONSYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED FOR A 2000 P.SF. SOIL.2. FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE FULL HEIGHT ATUNBALANCED FILL GREATER THAN 3'4".3. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MINIMUM @ 6'O.C. MAX. 12" MIN, FROM EACH END. MINIMUM OF 2BOLTS IN EACH SILL PLATE (REFER TO STRUCTURALPAGES).4. PAD FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IS TO BE LOCATED(3") FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING TYP. (WHENREQUIRED)5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PAGES FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING RE-BAR/ETC.6. CCOVERSHEETSCALED PRINT @ 24X36SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE IRC-1-2020 MINNESOTA STATE RESIDENTIAL CODE-2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE MECHANICAL&FUEL GASCODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE-2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODEDESIGNED WITH 2000 PSI SOILS, ALL FOUNDATIONCONSTRUCTION MUST FACTOR IN THIS AT A MINIMUM.DESIGNED WITH "EXPOSURE B" CLASSIFICATIONS ANDWINDGUSTS OF 115 MPH PER 2020 MN RESIDENTIAL CODEREGULATIONS.-ALL FOUNDATION WALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATIONUSED TO CONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS TOBE ON SITE WHEN POURING OR BUILDING WALLS.-ALL STRUCTURAL BEAMS, POSTS & TALL WALLS ARETO BE BUILT PER I-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSES ARETO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERSSPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSSPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE ON SITE DURINGINSTALLATION.-SH3050 EQUALS SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2646 EQUALS FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-20.2. ALL ATTIC SPACES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-49.3. ALL FLOOR SPACES OVER UNCONDITIONEDSPACE OR CANTILEVERED ARE TO BEINSULATED TO MIN. R30.Page 103 of 109 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION1R 5 '-6 "4'-0"2'-8 1/4"SMART PANEL DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARE CMUBASE W/STONE VENEER & 3" PRECAST CAP PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.R7'-3 1/2"4'-0"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"10'-0"8 1/4"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEMSMART PANEL DETAIL12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"8'-6"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4'-9 3/4"2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.HANGING PORCH LIGHTBELOW ROOF.21'-11 3/4"PANEL MATERIALPER SPEC.PITCH CHANGE1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A1FRONTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 104 of 109 4'-0"4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIM6X6 DECK POST PER SPEC.NOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A2LEFTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 105 of 109 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REAR ELEVATION1PITCH CHANGE4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIM12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILINGDECK POSTSPER PLAN8'-7 1/8"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A3REARELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 106 of 109 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION14'-0"2'-8 1/4"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER4" TRIM PER SPEC.DECORATIVE CEDARBRACKET PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.METAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOF8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4"SHADOW BOARDPER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARECMU BASE W/STONE VENEER& 3" PRECAST CAPPER DETAIL3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.PITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGESMART PANEL DETAIL5'-3"4" TRIM PER SPEC.5 1/2"10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM5'-3"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILING2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"6"3'-4"5'-9 1/2"4'-3"20'-4"8'-5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"DECK POSTSPER PLAN1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A4RIGHTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 107 of 109 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)P.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILINGUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGNOTE:DECK FOOTINGS SIZED TOACCOMODATE FUTUREROOF OVER PORCH.FTG/POST A: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST B: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 24" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST C: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 26" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FOOTING NOTES:BACKFILL W/ GRAVEL/SANDCOMPACTED FILL BELOW FOOTINGSUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGF.D.RADON -UP 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C.SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)F.D. 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)C JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC J6"8"8"6"8"8"8"8"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"8"6"8"10"1'-0"6"8"4'-3"3'-2"36'-3"43'-8"1'-0"57'-2"22'-0"15'-9 1/4"6'-0"2 3/4"123'-10"9'-8"6'-6"6'-6"2'-0"1'-10"18'-0"1'-10"8"9'-0"1'-4"8"9'-0"1'-4"21'-8"11'-0"11'-2"6'-0"11'-0"1'-0"11'-10"16'-0"10'-6"1'-0"2'-8"55'-10"6"6"8"10"5'-10"6'-0"10'-1"5'-11"5'-0 3/4"5'-5 1/4"4'-0"101'-10"24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.9'-0"9'-0"10'-9 1/4"11'-3 1/4"4'-8 1/2"12'-3"16'-11 1/2"22'-0 1/2"39'-0"2'-0"18'-0"59'-0"9 1/4"7'-6 1/2"2 3/4"8'-0"12'-4"15'-9 1/4"2 3/4"4'-0"16'-0"2'-0"4'-0"13'-9 1/2"9'-4 1/2"11'-5"8"2'-8"2'-6"1'-1 1/2"2'-6"3'-10 3/4"8'-0"18'-5 3/4"6'-5 1/2"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"9'-8"12'-0"3'-11"3'-6"3'-6"2'-2"5'-7"36'-8"61'-4"6'-7"5'-0"8"7"17'-4"2'-6"8"11'-11"6'-0"17'-3"4'-8 1/2"11"5'-3"2'-2"1'-1"10'-11"6'-1 1/2"8"2'-10"7'-7"2'-6"8 1/2"5'-4"11'-1"3'-7 1/2"7'-10"3'-10"10"11'-6"1'-2"8"8"8"23'-9"8"8"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.36" CODE RAILING20'-4"37'-8"1'-0"2 3/4"7'-10 3/4"9'-8"2 3/4"18'-0"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.7 1/4"5 1/2"7 1/4"4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULARCOMPACTED FILL4" CONCRETE SLAB W/FIBERMESH REINFORCEMENTOVER COMPACTED FILL4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER DROPPED 1'-4 3/4"6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULAR COMPACTED FILLSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3190 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 147 UNFINISHED SQUARE FEET FOUNDATION PLAN1MIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERFOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE,OR WALKOUTS HAVECANTILEVERED SILLS.REFER TO SECTIONS FORADDITIONAL SPANCRETEINFORMATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION1D11D22D11D3/D4(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEEN WINDOWS(2)11-7/8" 2.0E LVLDROPPED BEAM ABV.28"X28"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL FLUSH BEAM ABV.XPOINT LOADSFROM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVLFLUSH BEAM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGPOINT LOADFROM ABV.28"X28"X12" PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGXFUTURE POINTLOAD FROM ABV.POINT LOADS FROM ABV.42"X42"X16" SPREAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4REBAR DOWELS GOING BOTH DIRECTIONSIN BOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING40"X40"X16" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTINGX28"X28"X12" PADFOOTINGSP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGFTG/POST"A"(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"A"FTG/POST"C"(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAM(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"B"FTG/POST"B"8"8"8"28"X28"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.34"X34"X14" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.X4'-8"MIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 6"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSFLOOR DRAIN UNDERDROPPED BOWLING ALLEY TOBE CONNECTED TO SUMPCONFIRM BOWLING ALLEYTROUGH SIZE WITH BOWLINGALLEY MANUFACTURER86'-0"1'-8 1/2"1'-6"12'-7 1/2"STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.TEMP.10" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLL W/ #5'S VERTICAL@ 18" O.C. AND #4'S HORIZONTAL @ 24" O.C.,MINIMUM. (OFFESET TO INSIDE FACE, TYPICAL.)2"2'-6"10"6"1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOIL CONDITION2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 8" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FANSDSD1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING GRADE IS CONSIDERED0'0" ON THIS FOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1) TRIMMER.(UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESS NOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARE TRIMMERS,MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONS TO BE INCLUDED ASWELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREAS AND DOWNTO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAME MATERIAL AS COLUMNSUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER,SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB OR PLYWOOD SHEATHING& NAILED PER CODE (MAY BE REFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINALTHICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKING W/ CLIPS,NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMON NAILS, 6" O.C. @EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILED OR SCREWEDTO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6dCOMMON NAILS 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10. REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMINGINFORMATION.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips5-28-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A6FOUNDATIONPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 108 of 109 Page 109 of 109