Loading...
07222025 Planning Commission Agenda Packet CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA July 22, 2025 at 7:00 PM Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes a. Approve meeting minutes from the June 24, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting. 4. Public Hearings a. CASE No. 2025-11 Conditional Use Permit Application of Pot Mama's MSO LLC for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a cannabis retailer located at 1155 Centre Pointe Drive b. CASE No. 2025-12 MRCCA Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit at 1867 Hunter Lane c. CASE No. 2025-13 Conditional Use Permit Application of St. Augustine School for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a middle and secondary school located at 1345 Mendota Heights Road 5. New and Unfinished Business 6. Updates/Staff Comments 7. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aid. However, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Hall at 651.452.1850 with requests. Page 1 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 16 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 24, 2025 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Commissioners Patrick Corbett, Cindy Johnson, Brian Udell (arrived at 7:40 p.m.), Jason Stone, Jeff Nath, and Steve Goldade. Those absent: None Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as submitted. Approval of May 27, 2025 Minutes COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2025. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Hearings A) PLANNING CASE 2025-07 DANIEL MICHEL, 1341 CHERRY HILL ROAD – VARIANCE Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Daniel Michel is requesting a variance to residential fence height standards for his property located at 1341 Cherry Hill Road. The applicant’s existing rear yard fence is nine feet in height, and the existing side yard fence is six feet in height. The request is to replace the six-foot segment of fencing on the side property line with fencing nine feet tall, consistent with the existing rear yard segment, and tapering to six- foot fencing as the fence segment proceeds west. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Page 2 of 83 3a. June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 16 Commissioner Johnson asked if the distance of 15 feet from the property line is referencing the corner of the fence. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the existing fence is roughly located on the property line; therefore, that distance would be measured from the corner of the fence, which is the property line. Commissioner Corbett asked how the dimensions were decided. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained how she created that recommendation, noting that is open to adjustment from the Commission. Commissioner Stone asked if the property owner would be required to maintain the grass on the other side of the fence. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the property owner would be responsible for mowing their own property. She stated that the boulevard between the trail and the fence is currently maintained by the applicant and would continue to do so. Commissioner Corbett asked for more information on the grade changes between the properties. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that the grade changes are east to west. She stated that the prior approval considered the grade changes between the property line and the trail. Danny Michel, applicant, stated that he likes the recommendation from staff to taper the fence as that would flow more with the contours of the land. He stated that the property behind the fence is the Dakota County right-of-way, noting that he has received permission from the County to maintain that area and plant bushes. He asked for clarification on the degree of the taper for the fence, noting that he cannot receive a quote from a fence company without that information. He stated that they enjoy their backyard and just want the property to be safe for their children. He noted a previous tree that needed to be removed and bushes that did not work, which would have provided the desired privacy. He commented that the fence seems to be the best option. Commissioner Goldade asked if there had been a conversation with the property at 1411 Farmdale, as they would see the taller fence. Mr. Michel replied that he had been told by neighbors that the property owner is not currently in the home, so they were unable to obtain his signature. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Page 3 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 16 COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Corbett stated that he mostly aligns with the amended recommendation by staff. He stated that his question was related to where the tapering begins. He stated that someone standing on a deck and seeing into someone else’s backyard would not be justification alone for a taller fence. Commissioner Johnson agreed with the comment that neighbors standing on a porch and seeing into another yard would not be a practical difficulty. She stated that she could agree with a taller fence at the corner, but was unsure that 15 feet was the right length for the taper. She stated that she would like the fence to meet the six-foot height sooner rather than later, as that is the standard. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained how she came to the 15-foot length recommendation. She recognized that the applicant wanted clarification on the type of taper and noted that while she did not specify the method of taper, the Commission could provide input. Commissioner Stone commented that he had a similar fence and elevation change, noting that they installed a six-foot fence that ended up being 4.5 feet. He stated that he does not oppose the request. Commissioner Johnson stated that she could support either the terraced or angled taper, but did not want to see the nine-foot extend for a long stretch into the neighbor’s yard. Commissioner Corbett agreed that the practical difficulty loses its argument at some point, as the practical difficulty is Wachtler. He stated that he trusts the staff recommendation and that the staff and the applicant could decide on the type of taper. Commissioner Johnson referenced the side property line, which abuts 1411, and asked the distance of the property line. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the existing fence in that location is 105 or 106 feet. COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GOLDADE, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST, WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS BASED ON CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT, AS INCLUDED, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE PROPOSED HIGHER FENCE SHALL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT (INSTEAD OF ZONING PERMIT) AS PER MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODES. 2. THE PROPOSED FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED NINE FEET IN HEIGHT, AS MEASURED AT A POINT SIX INCHES BELOW THE TOP OF THE SUPPORTED POSTS. Page 4 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 16 3. THE PROPOSED FENCE SHALL TAPER FROM NINE FEET TO SIX FEET, BEGINNING AT THE POINT 15 FEET INWARD TO THE WEST FROM THE EXISTING FENCE BOUNDARY ADJACENT TO WACHTLER AVENUE. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its July 1, 2025, meeting. B) PLANNING CASE 2025-08 GLENN BARON, 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Glenn Baron represents The Heights Social and Racquetball Club in their request to modify their Conditional Use Permit approval for outdoor commercial recreation, which was approved by the City in February 2024. Outdoor commercial recreation use is a conditional use in the I-Industrial zoning district when accessory to an approved indoor commercial recreation use. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Corbett referenced the recommended condition that the activity would be seasonal and asked if that is necessary. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that was a carryover condition from the previous approval, but agreed that could be omitted. Commissioner Johnson appreciated the lighting information that was supplied. She asked if the lighting is downcast. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden confirmed that all exterior lighting in the city is required to be downcast. Glenn Baron, applicant, and Frank Zenk were present to address any questions of the Commission. Mr. Zenk stated that they are very excited to bring this outdoor padel activity to the community. He provided background information on the planning that has been done to properly plan for this use and welcomed any questions. Page 5 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 16 Chair Field commented that the charts provided were amazing. Commissioner Goldade recognized the value that the indoor portion of the business has added to the community. He asked why the business is interested in expanding outdoors for such a short season. Mr. Zenk replied that they would like to provide an exciting venue for their members in the summer, and people like to be outdoors when they can. He stated that padel also benefits from not having the limitation of a roof. He stated that pickleball players might enjoy the indoor environment because of the type of ball used and to avoid the wind, where the wind and outdoor environment add to the enjoyment of padel. Mr. Baron commented that they have also run out of indoor space. Mr. Zenk commented that they would not intend to use the outdoor courts once the snow falls. He agreed that it would be helpful to remove that condition or clarify that the area will not be used during times of snow. Commissioner Johnson commented that this is an allowed use in the industrial district, and there has been no negative impact on residential properties in terms of noise or sound. Commissioner Udell arrived. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. ALL PARKING FOR THE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING MUST BE ACCOMMODATED ON SITE. ANY INDICATION THAT THE SITE IS UNDER PARKED MAY RESULT IN REQUIRED AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AND/OR THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 2. THE HOURS OF OPERATION FOR THE OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION (PADEL AND PICKLEBALL COURTS) SHALL BE LIMITED TO 6 A.M. TO 11:30 P.M. Page 6 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 16 3. THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED A READING OF .2 FOOT- CANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINES. 4. SITE GRADING, EROSION CONTROL, AND STORMWATER MANGEMENT PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WHICH SHOW EXISTING CONTOURS, PROPOSED GRADING ELEVATIONS, STORMWATER MANGEMENT DETAILS, AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 5. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its July 1, 2025, meeting. C) PLANNING CASE 2025-09 DARREL TUTEWOHL, 2150 AZTEC LANE – VARIANCE Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Darrel Tutewohl is seeking to construct a new three-season porch onto the single-family home located at 2150 Aztec Lane, in the place of a currently existing rear deck. The request requires a variance from rear yard setback requirements for such an addition in the R-1 Zoning District. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson asked if the impervious surface was calculated for the property. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the property still meets the impervious surface calculation as the porch is the same size as the deck. Commissioner Corbett asked if there is an overlay for older homes. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that is incorrect, as that was removed in the recent ordinance update. Page 7 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 16 Commissioner Goldade asked for details on the ownership of the rear property and the plans for development. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the Dakota County Community Development Agency owns that property, and at this time, there is no plan to develop this site. Darrel Tutewohl, applicant, stated that they have been at the property for 53 years. He explained that the deck is starting to deteriorate, and with their age, they would like more protection from the sun and insects. He noted that the porch would be slightly smaller than the deck to be flush with the wall. He stated that they are attempting to obtain to do what they can do on their small lot. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Gary Fischbach, 2150 Fox Place, stated that he also has a three-season patio on his home. He stated that he likes to see people improving their property and enjoying their property. He commented that the neighbors support this project and enjoy the wooded Dakota County property behind this property. He asked that the Commission support the request. Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Corbett commented that the justification of the applicant’s narrative was off, but noted that the explanation of staff was correct, and therefore, his motion is based on the recommendation and justification provided by staff rather than the applicant. COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE 15-FOOT VARIANCE REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PORCH, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS INCLUDED HEREIN, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE 15-FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 10 X 12 THREE-SEASON PORCH IN THE REAR YARD. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL NOT DEVIATE FROM THE PORCH PLAN UNDER THIS APPLICATION REVIEW WITHOUT FIRST SEEKING AND RECEIVING CITY APPROVALS, UNLESS CITY CODE PROVIDES FOR CERTAIN OR ALLOWABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE WITHOUT ANY ADDITIONAL APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS. 3. NO WORK BEGINS ON THE PROPOSED PORCH CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE CITY. Page 8 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 16 Further discussion: Commissioner Johnson stated that even though it is a smaller lot size, the impervious surface maximum is still not exceeded. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its July 1, 2025, meeting. D) PLANNING CASE 2025-10 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY (XCEL ENERGY), 800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY – MRCCA PERMIT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that Xcel Energy (Northern States Power Company) is seeking approval of a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit and Conditional Use Permit, in order to authorize the construction of a new 24 x 24 electronic control center within the fenced compound area at the Sibley Propane Plant facility, located at 800 Sibley Memorial Highway. Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Johnson asked for clarification on the square shown in the overlays and asked if that is the proposed location for the improvement. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that square is a quirk of the Dakota County system and is not a specific part of this request. She confirmed that no tree removal is required. George Wojcicki, Xcel Energy, provided additional details on the proposed structure. He noted that the existing building would remain as file storage. Michael Mohs, Xcel Energy, stated that this plant is a peaking plant and represents a significant load that is required when the coldest weather comes around. He stated that the construction season is very tight. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Page 9 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 9 of 16 Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER UDELL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STONE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED MRCCA PERMIT AND AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FROM XCEL ENERGY AND FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS AND WORK DESCRIBED, ILLUSTRATED, AND DETAILED ON THE “SIBLEY PROPANE PLANT” PLANS, DATED 5-27-2025, AND ANY OTHER PLANS RELATED TO THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE THE ONLY WORK OR IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWED AND APPROVED UNDER THIS NEW MRCCA PERMIT. 2. FULL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION MEASURES WILL BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO AND DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION WORK ACTIVITIES. 3. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE DOCUMENT. THE APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT AND RECEIVE A SWPPP PERMIT AND NPDES PERMIT (IF NECESSARY) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK. 4. ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7 A.M. AND 8 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9 A.M. TO 5 P.M. WEEKENDS. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its July 1, 2025, meeting. New and Unfinished Business A) TABLED PLANNING CASE 2025-103, SPENCER MCMILLAN – 1707 DELAWARE AVENUE – PRELIMINARY PLAT Chair Field noted that he was not present at the last review, and the statement was made that he might have a conflict of interest as he lives in this area. He stated that after a conversation with the City Attorney, it was determined that he does not have a conflict of interest. Page 10 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 10 of 16 Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained that the applicant is seeking a Preliminary Plat approval of the properties located at 1707 Delaware Avenue and two vacant parcels generally located at the north end of Ridgewood Drive. The residential property and the two vacant parcels are all owned by Spencer McMillan, the applicant in this planning case. The proposed plat is titled McMillan Estates, and the subdivision would divide and redistribute the existing land within the three parcels into six new lots of record. Community Development Director Sarah Madden stated that in 2021, an application was submitted to the City for the subject site (by a different applicant and property owner) with a very similar proposal for subdivision of the existing three parcels into three new lots of record (Planning Case No. 2021-19). That prior application was withdrawn before the public hearing at the Planning Commission. Within the prior applicant’s written notice of withdrawal, they indicated that the applicant team was unable to come to an agreement with the seller and property owner regarding a request for dedicated right-of-way along Delaware Avenue for Dakota County. The property sold following this withdrawn application, and the item in this planning case is a separate application by the current applicant and property owner. Community Development Director Sarah Madden stated that this current property owner and applicant submitted a previous application in 2024, known as Planning Case No. 2024-01, which subdivided the subject site into three new lots of record. The Planning Commission reviewed that application at public hearings from March – June of 2024, and the City Council was not supportive of the applicant’s prior request to defer public improvements. Ultimately, the applicant withdrew that prior application in order to resubmit with greater detail and required information to the City relating to the construction of the cul-de-sac extension of Ridgewood Drive. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that this item was presented under a fully noticed public hearing process on May 27, 2025, and nine residents spoke at that public hearing. Written comments have also been received for this item and are included in the report. As of the submittal of this report, there were seven instances of public comment and have been included in the public comments. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a planning staff report and a presentation on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions. Commissioner Stone asked if the wetland impacts would not be approved until August 19th. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that she does not have a specific date that the City will act on that. She stated that the TAC has met and recommended approval. Commissioner Stone stated that he would prefer to wait until that approval is gained. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that this is a preliminary plat, and both matters can run concurrently. She stated that one does not have to be approved before the other, Page 11 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 11 of 16 and the recommendation on the wetland will be provided to the City Council for consideration. She stated that the City needs to take action on both the preliminary plat and the wetland by August 19th. She stated that tabling this would limit the amount of time the City Council can consider and discuss this item. Commissioner Stone commented that the majority of concern from the neighborhood is related to building on wetlands. Commissioner Corbett stated that things can keep moving in parallel, and if the wetland is not approved as recommended, this would not be approved by the City Council. He stated that he would not want to table again, as that would limit the ability of the City Council to have more than one discussion. Commissioner Stone asked if this decision would be part of the review for the wetland. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that those are separate applications and reviews, noting that the wetland decision is not based on the proposed preliminary plat recommendation and is instead reviewed under specific criteria and involves other agencies with that type of jurisdiction. She confirmed that the recommendation of the Planning Commission on this case has no bearing on the wetland decision. Commissioner Corbett asked and received confirmation that the other agencies involved in the wetland review have already recommended approval. Commissioner Goldade referenced the comments made by a resident at the last meeting related to the Comprehensive Plan and asked if staff believes that there should be a comprehensive plan for the development of this area or whether development can be done piece by piece. He wanted to ensure that the Koehlers could develop their property in the future. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the Comprehensive Plan of the City mentioned the R-E properties and the ability for future development if streets and utilities are extended. She stated that residents have stated that they would like an overall plan for all potentially developable properties, but individual property owners have the right to develop their property alone. She stated that the applicant has included the preliminary easement to the north for utilities, which abuts the Koehler property. She stated that City staff does not recommend that to be dedicated as right-of-way and prefers the easement option. Commissioner Goldade asked if the tree replacement would be done onsite. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that there is a related condition recommended that addresses that issue. She stated that an attempt must be made to replace trees onsite prior to providing an alternative replacement measure. She stated that the applicant has stated that not all trees can be replaced onsite, and an arborist would make the determination as to whether it is feasible. Page 12 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 12 of 16 Commissioner Johnson referenced the issue of right-of-way and stated that it is her understanding that the original cul-de-sac did have a right-of-way and not just easements, which allows for Mr. McMillan to extend the cul-de-sac. She commented that if it were just an easement, it is her understanding that the two adjacent property owners could veto the right-of-way that would be needed. She stated that the new cul-de-sac would be 25 feet and would not provide compliant right-of-way; therefore, adjacent property owners could not use that for future development. She believed that a compliant 60-foot right-of-way should be required to allow the northern property owner to develop in the future. Commissioner Udell stated that there is language in the Comprehensive Plan preventing property from becoming landlocked. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the preliminary plat in this application shows a 60-foot-wide easement. Commissioner Johnson stated that she would prefer to have this as a right-of-way rather than an easement. Commissioner Corbett agreed it would be reasonable to request that be right-of-way rather than an easement. Commissioner Udell agreed. Commissioner Corbett referenced lot six and stated that he would like the City Council to consider whether the omission of that lot would placate the neighborhood, as that one home seems to impact the residents more than the others. Commissioner Johnson stated that there are forestry requirements to replace trees on the property, but also recognized potential impacts that could occur to trees on adjacent properties if that lot were developed. She stated that there seems to be agreement that the 60-foot right-of-way should be required in place of the easement. She was unsure how to detail the comments related to the potential elimination of lot six and tree impacts. Commissioner Corbett was unsure of how lot six could be denied, as it would be a preference of the neighborhood and not anything violating ordinance or requiring a variance. Commissioner Udell agreed with the concern related to the trees on the existing lot adjacent to lot six, but recognized that some of that is speculative. He stated that a tree could die in five years, but that does not necessarily mean it is a result of development. Commissioner Corbett commented that there are many driveways in the same proximity throughout the city. He stated that if a driveway could not be closer than 40 feet to a big tree, that would be impossible to enforce within the community, and many properties would be out of compliance. Page 13 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 13 of 16 Commissioner Stone commented that it seems there are different concerns members have on this request. Commissioner Udell stated that, based on the role of the Planning Commission, he appreciates staff following up on the concerns raised at the last meeting. He agreed that the requirement of right-of-way should be included. He recognized that the wetlands review is outside of the purview of the Commission, and everything else complies. He stated that the City Council has more discretion, but the Commission is where it is, as the request meets the requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked how the language could be worded to ensure protection of the trees on adjacent properties. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden asked if the Commission simply wants it communicated to the Council, as she can do that in her presentation and within the staff report, or whether they were looking to add another condition. She stated that the urban forest preservation ordinance does not speak to impacts on adjacent properties, and therefore, she would not recommend adding language to that condition. She agreed that it would be broad to just state construction impacts, as that could be dust, noise, or other code enforcement items. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that for street projects, they require roots to be treated and sealed. He stated that there would be difficulty in stating that a driveway could not be constructed that meets the City Code. Commissioner Johnson commented that there will be impacts to those trees on the adjacent property and wanted to ensure that assisting this resident in moving forward does not cause detriment to another resident. Commissioner Corbett suggested making a new condition stating that an attempt must be made to mitigate damage to trees on adjacent properties. Community Development Director Sarah Madden stated that if the condition is added, she would recommend language similar to what Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek suggested. She stated that the procedure for the tree permit does include those protective measures, and it is implied for off-site impacts as well. Commissioner Johnson stated that, in her opinion, there will be no protection that will help those trees, and she would rather require replacement. Commissioner Corbett stated that perhaps the applicant would potentially be liable for tree replacement on the adjacent property. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden noted that would be outside of the scope of authority within preliminary plat. She stated that there may be some wiggle room on where the driveway could be located as long as the property setback of five feet is met, along with the wetland buffer requirement. She stated that a large-scale adjustment could not be made because of the location of the wetland and its required buffer. Page 14 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 14 of 16 COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NATH, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF SPENCER MCMILLAN FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A SIX-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS MCMILLAN ESTATES, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT AS INCLUDED HEREIN, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE PRELIMINARY PLANS PRESENTED UNDER THIS PLAT REQUEST DO NOT REPRESENT OR PROVIDE APPROVAL OF BUILDING PAD SITES, SETBACKS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, OR DRIVEWAY ALIGNMENTS. FINAL LAYOUTS MUST MEET R-E ZONE STANDARDS AND SHALL BE APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS FOR EACH LOT. 2. A BUILDING PERMIT, INCLUDING ALL NEW GRADING AND DRAINAGE WORK, MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK. 3. THE DEVELOPER/APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT FINAL GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS AND A DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN WITH ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AS PART OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 4. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT SITE AND ON EACH NEW BUILDABLE LOT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. 5. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SHALL BE MANAGED FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AND DEDICATED IN A UTILITY EASEMENT AS PART OF THE FINAL PLAT. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEFERRED TO THE INDIVIDUAL SINGLE- FAMILY HOME LOTS. 6. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATIONS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) AREA(S) MUST BE ESTABLISHED, APPROVED BY THE CITY, AND INCLUDED IN THE FINAL PLAT PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR RECORDING WITH DAKOTA COUNTY. 7. ALL WETLAND IMPACTS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, INCLUDING TITLE 12-ZONING, SECTION 12-4A-4: WETLAND REQUIREMENTS AND TITLE 15-ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4: WETLAND CONSERVATION. 8. THE FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE REPLACEMENT OF TREE REMOVAL IMPACTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 15-ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, CHAPTER 3: URBAN FOREST PRESERVATION. AN ATTEMPT MUST BE MADE TO MITIGATE TREE REMOVAL IMPACTS ON SITE PRIOR TO PROVIDING AN ALTERNATIVE TREE REPLACEMENT MEASURE TO THE CITY. 9. IN LIEU OF LAND DECIATION, THE DEVELOPER/APPLICANT SHALL PAY A PARK DEDICATION FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000 PER UNIT (6 LOTS = Page 15 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 15 of 16 $4,000/UNIT, OR $24,000) IS TO BE COLLECTED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AND BEFORE THE FINAL PLAT IS RELEASED FOR RECORDING WITH DAKOTA COUNTY, AND BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS. 10. ANY NEW OR EXISTING SANITARY OR WATER SERVICE LINES MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND/OR ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT. 11. THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE A BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT) AGREEMENT TO THE CITY AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW PROCESS FOR EACH NEW HOME AND NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. 12. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES SHALL BE EXECUTED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL BEFORE THE FINAL PLAT IS RELEASED FOR RECORDING WITH DAKOTA COUNTY, AND BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS. 13. THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING THE EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC STREET IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAT AT RIDGEWOOD DRIVE AND THE NECESSARY UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS, PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PLAT. 14. THE EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC “BULB” OF THE EXISTING RIDGEWOOD DRIVE MUST BE REMOVED AND RECONSTRUCTED TO CITY STREET STANDARDS PRIOR TO APPLYING FOR ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PLAT. 15. THERE MUST BE A 60-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PLAT. 16. AN ATTEMPT MUST BE MADE TO MITIGATE TREE DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. Further discussion: Commissioner Corbett asked that the Council consider lot six and whether it could be eliminated, and the Commission agreed. Chair Field commented that this is a much more intense development than what was considered earlier this year, and he would have preferred the previous development proposal. He recognized that there is no way this could be denied because it meets all requirements. Commissioner Corbett commented that the previous application had more errors and therefore did not conform with the City Code. Chair Field commented that the previous application would have been better for the neighbors, noting that he agrees with the right-of-way requirement to support the preservation of development rights for the Koehlers. Commissioner Goldade stated that if he were to vote with his heart, he would vote no, but recognizes that is not his job and the request meets all requirements. He believed that the Commission has done its job in ensuring that all requirements are met. Page 16 of 83 June 24, 2025 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 16 of 16 Commissioner Johnson agreed that it is the job of the Commission to ensure consistency with ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan and to protect the rights of those looking to develop and residents surrounding the subject property. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised that the City Council would consider this application at its July 1, 2025, meeting. Staff Announcements / Updates Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided an update on planning cases recently considered by the City Council and other items of interest to the Commission. She noted that she will be planning to hold a worksession in the coming months. Commissioner Corbett asked for information on PUDs and whether they are reversible. Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that is a change in zoning, and therefore, a zoning change would be necessary to remove that PUD. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek noted that approvals for a PUD have a specified timeline for when development must begin. Adjournment COMMISSIONER STONE MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:23 P.M. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Page 17 of 83 4.a Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-11 Conditional Use Permit Application of Pot Mama's MSO LLC for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a cannabis retailer located at 1155 Centre Pointe Drive Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: The applicant, Pot Mama’s MSO LLC, has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a cannabis retailer location, located in the B-1 General Business zoning district at 1155 Centre Pointe Drive. A public hearing notice for this planning item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice letters were mailed to all properties within 350-feet of the subject property. The city has not received any comments or objections to this land use request as of the submittal of this report. Background: The subject property is located north of Centre Pointe Drive and generally west of Lexington Avenue in an office park development. The property is surrounded by similar office and warehousing type uses, all sharing a zoning designation of B-1 General Business, and a Comprehensive Plan guidance of LB – Limited Business. The proposed cannabis retailer use is a listed Conditional Use in the B-1 General Business zoning district, and is subject to a retail registration requirement and performance standards in Title 3: Business and License Regulations, Chapter 8: Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Businesses. A Cannabis Retailer is defined as “Any person, partnership, firm, corporation, or association, foreign or domestic, selling cannabis product to a consumer and not for the purpose of resale in any form.” in Title 3-8, and is subject to licensing requirements by the State Office of Cannabis Management. Analysis: Pursuant to Title 12-5B-5, the city recognizes that the development and execution of Zoning Code is based upon the division of the city into districts within which regulations are specified. It is further recognized that there are special or conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public need for the particular location. To provide for these needs, the city may approve a conditional use for those uses and purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to ensure that the purpose and intent of this chapter is effectively carried out. Page 18 of 83 The City may grant a conditional use provided the proposed use demonstrates the following: a) Use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, b) Use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, c) Use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value, and d) Use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. A-C) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; nor depreciate surrounding property value. Staff Response: The proposed cannabis retailer will be a 3,879 sq-ft. retail space, with secure storage and staff areas. The applicant has provided the business plan for the operation as an attachment to this report. The intention is to provide branding that is neutral and avoids cannabis-related imagery on the visible exterior of the space. The business will be subject to state licensing requirements, and to comply with the Office of Cannabis Management rules, the applicant has noted that professional security and secure storage systems will be in place, as well as strict age verification systems and product testing. The applicant intends the space to be more than a retail business use, and to provide educational programs about cannabis for interested parties, and support group functions to mitigate the stigma surrounding cannabis use. To mitigate traffic impact, the business will be appointment-based and with timed-entry to control the flow of customers. The limited timeframe for each customer visit would also limit any possible congestion or peak traffic issues. The business plan indicates that the maximum number of FTE employees for the flagship store would be 15. The existing site has 175+ parking spaces for the multi-tenant building. The anticipated client and customer demand for the business is for appointment-based, private consultations. Based on the total size of the space, the City Code would require 22 parking spaces for the proposed use. The existing parking is sufficient for the proposed user, and the existing office spaces within the building with no anticipated issues. D) The proposed use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the city code and comprehensive plan, including all applicable performance standards, so as not to be in conflict on an on-going basis. Staff Response: The subject property is guided LB-Limited Business in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan provides the following goal statement: Goal 3: Encourage and support industrial and commercial development in designated areas. 1. The city will use available resources to identify redevelopment needs. This will include cooperation with Dakota County and the Metropolitan Council to achieve redevelopment objectives. 2. Transitions between adjoining land uses will be required for adjacent residential uses, and will be encouraged between compatible land uses (e.g. transition between a general manufacturing and retail use will be encouraged). 3. Amenities within the industrial and commercial districts will be encouraged to promote a more vibrant and attractive place for workers. Staff believes the proposed project is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan that encourages redevelopment of the industrial areas. The proposed use also supports a new business type within the business and office park, and within the community as a whole. The Limited Business land use category generally includes Page 19 of 83 uses with a daytime office use, which is compatible with this proposal. Specific to a cannabis-related business, the City adopted an ordinance which requires a retail registration for a business of this type, and overall the City has a maximum of one (1) retail registration which will be issued. If this Conditional Use Permit is approved, the applicant will proceed with pursuing the retail registration. The Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Retail Businesses ordinance has performance standards specific to cannabis businesses, as noted in the following section: 3-8-5: REQUIREMENTS FOR A CANNABIS BUSINESS: A. Minimum Buffer Requirements. 1. No cannabis business shall be located or operated within 500 feet of an existing lawful cannabis business. 2. No cannabis business shall be located or operated within 500 feet of an existing daycare, residential treatment facility, or an attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, including a playground or athletic field. 3. No cannabis business shall be located or operated within 1000 feet of a school. 4. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 462.357 subd. 1e, nothing in Section 3-8-5 (A) shall prohibit an active cannabis business or a cannabis business seeking registration from continuing operation at the same site if a daycare, residential treatment facility, attraction within a public park that is regularly used by minors, or school moves within the minimum buffer zone. B. Zoning and Land Use. 1. A cannabis or lower-potency hemp business licensed or endorsed by the OCM must be in compliance with the City’s Zoning Code including Title 12: Zoning, Chapter 3: Allowed Uses, Table 12-3B-1.1 Table of Uses. C. Hours of Operation. 1. Cannabis businesses are limited to retail sale of cannabis, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on Monday-Saturday; and between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on Sundays. (Ord. 597, 3-4-2025) The subject property is compliance with all buffer requirements detailed in Section A of the above ordinance, and this Conditional Use Permit application will, if approved, allow the business use in compliance with zoning parameters. Staff has determined that the proposed use has met the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit under the Zoning Ordinance, and is consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. With the conditions provided herein, the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor cause any serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor depreciate surrounding property values. Alternatives: 1.Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a cannabis retailer at 1155 Centre Pointe Drive with certain conditions and based on the findings of fact contained herein; or 2.Recommend denial based on the findings of fact(s) determined by the Planning Commission, that the Conditional Use Permit Amendment requested herein is not consistent with the City Code or Comprehensive Plan and may have negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood and/or properties; or 3.Table the application and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant. Page 20 of 83 Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days in conformance with Minnesota Statute 15.99 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for 1155 Centre Pointe Drive, based on the attached findings-of-fact and with the following conditionals of approval: 1.All parking for the multi-tenant building must be accommodated on site. Any indication that the site is under parked may result in required amendments to the Site Plan and/or the Conditional Use Permit. 2.Cannabis businesses are limited to retail sale of cannabis, cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on Monday-Saturday; and between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on Sundays. 3.Any new remodeling or interior work (including building, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling and other related work must be submitted for standard building permit review prior to any work being started. Attachments: 1.Findings of Fact for Approval 2.Site Location Map 3.Letter of Intent 4.Proposed Floor Plan 5.Pot Mama's Social Boutique - Business Plan Page 21 of 83 Planning Case 2025-11 (CUP for 1155 Centre Pointe Drive)Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Planning Case No. 2025-11 Conditional Use Permit for 1155 Centre Pointe Drive The following Findings-of-Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit request for a cannabis retailer: 1. The Proposed cannabis retailer use is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance for property in the Industrial district. 2. The proposed cannabis retailer use is consistent with the performance standards of the Title 3-8-5: Requirements for a Cannabis Business ordinance. 3. If approved, the proposed cannabis retailer use will be eligible to submit for a Retail Registration with the City. 4. With the conditions included herein, the site will provide adequate parking for the multi-tenant building. All parking will be accommodated on-site and no adverse impacts off-site are anticipated. 5. The property on which the proposed use is located is currently in compliance with all applicable City Code standards Page 22 of 83 4a1. 6666666666666666 66 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 666 6666666666666 6666666666 6 66666666666 66666666666666" ³ "" ³³³ " ³ ³ ³ ³ " " ³ !³³³! ³ ³ * * ! ! * * * ! * ! * !³ "" ³ ³³ " " "" " " ³ ³ ³ ³" ³³ ³ " " *** !³ ³ ³ ³ " ³ ³ " ³ ³!""³³ 6 6666666666FMFM66 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 1110 2060 1155 112011601140 1180 2025 2020 1150 1175 1101 11101179 HIGHWAY 62 CENTRE POINTE CURV CENTRE POINTE DRCENTRE POINTE BLVDHIGHWAY 62 Nearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial Map1155 Centre Pointe Drive Date: 7/18/2025 City ofMendotaHeights0210 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 23 of 83 4a2. Page 24 of 834a3. Page 25 of 83 Page 26 of 83 Page 27 of 83 Page 28 of 83 Page 29 of 83This page intentionally left blank. Page 30 of 834a4. Page 31 of 834a5. Page 32 of 83 Page 33 of 83 Page 34 of 83 Page 35 of 83 Page 36 of 83 Page 37 of 83 Page 38 of 83 Page 39 of 83 Page 40 of 83 Page 41 of 83 Page 42 of 83 Page 43 of 83 Page 44 of 83 Page 45 of 83 Page 46 of 83 Page 47 of 83 Page 48 of 83 Page 49 of 83 Page 50 of 83 Page 51 of 83 Page 52 of 83 4.b Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-12 MRCCA Permit Application of M&M Home Contractors for a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit at 1867 Hunter Lane Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: M&M Home Contractors is the Applicant and Owners’s Representative of the property located at 1867 Hunter Lane, and has requested a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit to construct a new single-family home located at 1867 Hunter Lane. A public hearing notice for this item was published in the Pioneer Press and notice letters were mailed to all surrounding properties within 350-feet of the subject property. No public comments were received as of the submittal of this report. Background: The subject property is located on the west side of Hunter Lane and generally southeast of Sibley Memorial Highway and adjacent wooded vacant lots. The subject property is part of the Colliton Place subdivision, and the prior home was demolished in 2023. The prior home was accessed from a long driveway that remains in place today which crossed from Hunter Lane to a point generally centrally located within the lot. The subject property is located within the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA), and therefore the construction of a new single-family home requires a MRCCA permit. Analysis: The existing lot is vacant, but previously was developed with a single-family home. The proposed project is to construct a new 8,907 sq-ft home on the property, generally located centrally on the lot and consistent with neighboring existing homes and the prior constructed home. The proposed home will be accessed by a reconstruction of the existing driveway, with a proposed circle drive closer to the new home. The proposed improvements are located outside of the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) and bluff setback, located at the rear of the property. The applicant is also proposing to construct two rock infiltration trenches on site; one at the rear of the property, and one north of the existing driveway in the front yard. The applicant has also indicated that they will be planting two new overstory trees in the front yard, consistent with zoning requirements. The proposed site plan, and layout of the home is consistent with the base requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets setback requirements for the R-1 zoning district, and 21.5% of the site would be covered by impervious surface, meeting the City's zoning requirements. Page 53 of 83 5.MRCCA Critical Area Permit Per Title 12, Chapter 6 Critical Area Overlay District a Critical Area Permit is required for the subject project. The following summary of the site is provided as reference: Standard Subject Property Conditions MRCCA Sub District Separated from River Bluff on Site? Yes, at the rear of the property Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) Yes, the Bluff Impact Zone crosses the west line of the lot, approximately 40-ft into the rear yard of the property. The proposed home is setback 102-ft from the BIZ. Significant Vegetative Stands or Primary Conservation Area (PCA) No. The proposed home is located more than 100-feet from any PCA or significant vegetation. The proposed rock infiltration garden is located 10-ft from the BIZ, and approximately 40-ft from the nearest significant existing vegetative stand. Subject to Section 12-6A-9 Vegetation Management No, does not meet criteria as no significant vegetative removal required as part of the proposed improvements. Subject to Section 12-6A-11 Land Alteration Standards and Stormwater Management Yes. A new home construction is permitted but stormwater must be diverted from any BIZ area. The demolition and new construction are both subject to the Land Alteration and Stormwater standards. Subject to Section 12-6A-12 Site Plan Requirements Yes. Must include Site Plan and Landscape Plan As described in Section 12-6A-4 C.3., the Separated from River (SR) sub-district describes the management purpose as, “...provides flexibility in managing development without negatively affecting the key resources and features of the river corridor. Minimizing negative impacts to primary conservation areas and minimizing erosion and the flow of untreated storm water into the river are priorities…” As indicated on the attached GIS maps, the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) crosses and covers the far western end of the site, within the first 40-ft of the rear yard. As shown on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, the applicant will construct a new single-family home and seed/sod the entirety of the site, install two rock infiltration trenches, add additional circle drive immediately in front of the home, and plant two new overstory trees. As proposed, the new home will be setback approximately 102-ft from the BIZ boundary, with the proposed rear deck approximately 78-ft from the BIZ. There is an additional Primary Conservation Areas on the site, as the nearest significant vegetative stands are located directly west of the property in the large vacant wooded hillside. The attached MRCCA Map illustrates the boundary of a Significant Existing Vegetative Stand of Midwestern White Oak – Red Oak Forest, which crosses the rear of the property approximately 10-ft in, and more than 100-ft from the proposed new home. The infiltration area in the rear yard is outside of all Primary Conservation Areas, and has been proposed to Page 54 of 83 comply with the City’s stormwater and land disturbance requirements which are requirements of the Building Permit process. Per Code Sect. 12-6A-12, the Detailed Site Plan must be drawn to scale and the proposed project accurately described through narrative and supporting maps and/or plans. The plan set for the new home is attached to this report, and the Site Survey and Landscaping Plan are included. The proposed new home location is sited on a relatively flat area of the lot, consistent with the prior home on site, and there are no significant grades. As noted on the attached plans, there are retaining walls proposed north of the new home, and west of the rear of the home in areas where a change in grade is present. Restoration of the site once the construction is complete is planned and described as sodded and irrigated. The Applicant did not include final planting details for any perennial beds or home perimeter landscaping on site, but did provide a landscape schedule indicated 2.5” overstory trees to be planted in the front yard consistent with R-1 Zoning requirements for a new home construction. Interagency Review Under the MRCCA Ordinance, the city is required to submit the MRRCA permit request to the MNDNR and the National Park Service (NPS). The plan set and project information was transmitted to both agencies for their review and comment. At the time of this report the agencies have not provided written response, and Staff will provide a verbal update of their correspondence at the Planning Commission meeting. Alternatives: 1.Approve the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, which would allow for the construction of a new single-family home and associated improvements based on the findings-of-fact that the proposed project is compliant with the policies and standards of the MRCCA Overlay District and City Zoning Code standards, with certain conditions; or 2.Deny the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, based on the revised or amended findings-of-fact that the application does not meet certain policies and standards of City Code as determined by the Planning Commission; or 3.Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant; Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota State Statute 15.99. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the MRCCA-Critical Area Permit request for 1867 Hunter Lane, with the following conditions: 1. A building permit, including a grading plan, must be approved by the City prior to the commencement of any site work. 2. The proposed project must comply with all requirements of the City’s Land Disturbance Guidance Document. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 3. All erosion control requirements must be put in place prior to the commencement of any grading and site work activities. Such measures must remain in place for the duration of the construction activities until proper site restoration plans are completed. 4. All grading and construction activity must comply with applicable federal, state, and local Page 55 of 83 regulations and codes. 5. All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekends. Attachments: 1.Findings of Fact for Approval 2.Site Location Map 3.MRCCA Map 4.Letter of Intent 5.1867 Hunter Lane Survey 6.1867 Hunter Lane Landscape Plan 7.Construction Plans - Cover Sheet 8.A1 - Front Elevation 9.A2 - Left Elevation 10.A3 - Rear Elevation 11.A5 - Right Elevation 12.A6 - Foundation Plan Page 56 of 83 Planning Case 2025-12 (MRCCA Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane) Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL MRCAA -Critical Area Permit for 1867 Hunter Lane The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed construction of a new single family home and associated improvements meets the general purpose and intent of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Separated from River Overlay District. 2. The proposed work and disturbance to construct the new home and associated improvements are low-intensity with no anticipated impact to Primary Conservation Areas within the MRCCA Plan, and the project includes restoration of the area once developed with sod cover and native trees. The proposed project is within the spirit and intent of the MRCCA Separated from River Overlay District that provides for flexibility within the management purpose. 3. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; should not cause any serious traffic congestion nor hazards; will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and said use appears to be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The construction of the home is shown in the plan to comply with all standards and regulations of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay District and Zoning Ordinance and other applicable ordinances; represents reinvestment in a residential neighborhood that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for residential land uses; and is consistent with current single- family development pattern of the neighborhood. Page 57 of 83 4b1. 6666666 6666666 66666666666666666666666666! "" ³³³³! ³ ³ ³ ³ ³³" """ " " "" "³³ ³³" ³* ³ ³³ ³ ³³** * ³ * ! ³ * **6666666666666 6 FMFMFMFMFMFMFM 6 6 6 66 66666!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 1885 1253 1889 1875 1881 1860 1880 1890 1870 1850 1254 1819 1845 1855 1867 1154 1827 1903 1175 1840 1833 1901 1247 1905 1831 1885 1907 1835 1911 1830 1836 1902 1838 1235 1908 1908 1914 1151 1916 1841 1851 1859 1865 1871 1875 1199 118712051921 11551171 1145 1242 1892 1919 1838 1248 1145 1920 1840 1230 HUNTER LNORCHARD PL SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYHUNTER CT ORCHARD CIRGLENHILL RDNearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial Map1867 Hunter Lane Date: 7/18/2025 City ofMendotaHeights0210 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 58 of 83 4b2. Page 59 of 83 4b3. Page 60 of 83 4b4. Page 61 of 83 4b5. Page 62 of 83 4b6. Page 63 of 83 X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXHUNTER LANE90'(1) SWO(1) SWOROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHROCK INFILTRATION TRENCHDRIVEWAY EASEMENTL-101LANDSCAPE PLANDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 06/19/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-101.dwg ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:6/19/2025 8:12:25 AM SUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANE HOUSE BUILD 1867 HUNTER LANE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM06/19/20250106/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 01GROUND COVER LEGEND1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.PLANT LEGENDOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREEDENOTES AREA TO BE SODDEDAND IRRIGATED.TOTAL AREA (0.6 AC)PLANT SCHEDULESYMBOL QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAMESIZESPACING O.C MATURE DIMENSIONSOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREESSWO 2Swamp White Oak / Quercus bicolor2.5" BBAS SHOWN H 50'-60' W 40'PLANTING NOTES1. PRIOR TO TREE STAKING AND PLANTING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONECALL (WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.COM OR 811) TO VERIFY UNDERGROUD UTILITIES. WHERE PRIVATEUTILITIES EXIST ON-SITE THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THOSE LOCATED AS WELL.2. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK: ANSI Z60.1 LATEST EDITION.HTTP://AMERICANHORT.ORG/DOCUMENTS/ANSI NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS AMERICANHORT 2014.PDF3. NO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CITY.4. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE FIELD REVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY TREE PROTECTION INSTALLATION.5. ALL TREE LOCATIONS TO BE FIELD STAKED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIELDREVIEW OF PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS WITH THE CITY AND PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOANY TREE INSTALLATION.6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE. NO PLANT MATERIAL IS TOBE LEFT OVERNIGHT ON THE PROJECT SITE WITHOUT BEING INSTALLED UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL BYCITY.7. IRRIGATION DESIGN TO COVER ALL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN AS IRRIGATED TO BE COMPLETED BY IRRGIATIONCONTRACTOR .LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSTOTAL PROJECT MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENTS 2 TREESSEC 12-4B-2 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ATTACHED BUILDING REQUIREMENTS:2 TREES3.a NEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING TEARDOWN AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE_FAMILY DETACHED ORATTACHED STRUCTURES ARE REQUIRED TO PLANT A MINIMUM OF ONE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREEPER 50-FEET OF LINEAL FRONTAGE OF PUBLIC STREET.SEC 15-3-2 TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 TREESNO TREE REMOVALS PROPOSED.NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.1. ALL LOTS MUST BE PLANTED WITH AN ACCEPTABLE GROUND COVER WHICH SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTEDWITH A NATIVE GROUND COVER.2. ALL NEW OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BE 2.5" CALIPER BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES.Page 64 of 83 PRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHCONTAINER GROWN MATERIALS SHALL HAVE ROOTS HANDS LOOSENEDUPON PLANTING; PRUNE ANY DEAD OR DESICCATED ROOTSBACKFILL AROUND ROOTS WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.HOLE SHOULD BE EXCAVATED SUCH THAT ROOTS ARE VERTICAL ANDFULLY EXTENDED. SCARIFY BOTTOM OF PIT (6 IN. MIN.)SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLANPRUNE ANY DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. DO NOT CUT LEADER.ROOT FLARE MUST BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE WITH MULCHLOOSEN SIDES OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE ANY DEAD, DAMAGED,OR GIRDLING ROOTS.BACKFILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH LOOSE SOIL. WORK SOILTO SETTLE AND REDUCE VOIDS OR AIR POCKETS.PLACE ROOT BALL ON SOIL BACKFILL SO TOP OF ROOTBALL IS ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE2 SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAILL-101 NOT TO SCALE3 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAILDRIP LINE OF TREE.L-101 NOT TO SCALE4 TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL4' HIGH SAFETY FENCE ATTACHED TO STEEL POSTS ATDRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO BE PROTECTED.SPECIES AS SHOWN ON PLAN2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.2X ROOT BALL DIA. MIN.18"4'L-102LANDSCAPE DETAILSDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.: 52856 06/19/2025LUCIUS JONETTDWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:B0026-0004D:\Midwest Wetland Improvements, LLC\Midwest Wetlands - OneDrive - MWI\Projects\0026 M&M Home Contractors\0004 - Hunter Lane\5_DESIGN\2_CAD\3 PLANSHEETS\L-102.dwg ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:6/19/2025 8:12:28 AM SUB CONSULTANT:CLIENT:M&M HOMECONTRACTORS1867 HUNTER LANE HOUSE BUILD 1867 HUNTER LANE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PROJECT TITLE:HRMCHK'D BY:LNJAPP'D BY:LNJP.O. BOX 448VICTORIA, MN 55386PHONE: (952) 261-9990WWW.MIDWESTWETLANDS.COMDESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:CERTIFICATION:413 PAUL AVE SCOLOGNE, MN 55322PHONE: 952-797-3720WWW.MANDMQUALITY.COM06/19/20250106/19/2025 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 01 Page 65 of 83 F.D.RADON -UPUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGWOOD10'X10'STAIRCASEFEATURESFURNACEWATER HEATERSUMP BASKETFLOOR DRAINWASHERDRYERLAUNDRY SINKFIREPLACESINKDISHWASHERREFRIGERATORVANITY/SINKTOILETSHOWERTUB/SHOWERUNITDOORWINDOWCLOSETSHELVINGSUPPORTPOSTSTRUCTURALBEAMSTAIRCASEINFORMATIONROOMNAMEATTIC ACCESSNOTE: KEY SHOWS INFORMATION/DETAILS THAT ARE NOT TYPICALLYNOTED, REFER TO PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/DETAILSSQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONSFINISHED SQ. FTG.3190 SQ.FTUNFINISHED SQ. FTG. 147 SQ.FT.OVERALL BASEMENT SQ. FTG. 3337 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG.2318 SQ.FT.GARAGE SQ. FTG. 1195 SQ.FT.OVERALL FIRST FLOOR SQ. FTG. 3513 SQ.FT.FINISHED SQ. FTG. 2057 SQ.FT.TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FTG:7565 SQ.FT.GRAND TOTAL SQ. FTG: 8907 SQ.FT.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25SHEET INDEX::::C COVERA1 FRONT ELEVATIONA2 LEFT ELEVATIONA3 REAR ELEVATIONA4 RIGHT ELEVATIONA5 ROOF PLANA6 FOUNDATION PLANA7 FINISHED BASEMENT PLANA8 FIRST FLOOR PLANSA9 SECOND FLOOR PLAND1 BUILDING SECTIONSD2 BUILDING SECTIOND3 BUILDING SECTIOND4 BUILDING SECTIOND5 DETAILSD6 DETAILSR1 RADON DETAILSS1 BASEMENT WALL BRACINGS2 1ST FLOOR BRACINGS3 2ND FLOOR BRACING & DETAILS1. ALL CEILINGS ARE TO HAVE 5/8" NON-SAGGYPSUM BOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. ALL WALLS ARE TO HAVE 12" GYPSUMBOARD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. GARAGE CEILING AND WALLS THAT ADJOINHOUSE WALLS ARE TO BE 58" GYPSUMBOARD PER CODE.1. ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS TO BE DOUBLE PANEGLASS PANELS WITH LOW-E RATINGS.2. ANY WINDOW WITHIN 24" OF A DOOR SWING MUSTBE TEMPERED PER CODE.3. ANY WINDOW ABOVE A TUB/WET AREA MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.4. ANY WINDOW WITHIN A STAIRWAY MUST BETEMPERED PER CODE.5. WINDOW GLAZING MUST BE AT LEAST 18" A.F.F.WHEN WINDOW IS ABOVE 6' FROM GRADE. IF WITHIN18", WINDOW MUST BE TEMPERED.6. ALL BEDROOMS TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE WINDOWTHAT HAS A CLEAR EGRESS OPENING OF 5.7 SQ. FT.WITH MIN. DIMENSIONS OF 24" IN HEIGHT AND 20"IN WIDTH, SILL HEIGHT NOT TO BE GREATER THAN 44"A.F.F.7. WINDOWS WITH SILLS WITHIN 3' OF THE FLOORTHEY SERVE AND ARE 72" ABOVE GRADE MUST EITHERHAVE A FALL PREVENTION OR OPENING LIMITERDEVICE PER CODE.1. ALL ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TOBE VERIFIED AND INSTALLED PER CODE BY APPROVEDTRADES AND INSTALLERS.2. HVAC CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LAYOUT FORDUCT-RUNS BEFORE INSTALLATION, IF MODIFICATIONIS REQUIRED, REPORT INFORMATION/CHANGES TOCONTRACTOR & LITTFIN DESIGN.1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 16" O.C. WITH ADOUBLE TOP PLATE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2. WALL FRAMING SHALL BE S.P.F. STUD GRADE ORBETTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (U.N.O.)3. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE PER PLAN4. ALL EXTERIOR HEADERS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 BEARING STUD & (1) 2X6 FULL HEIGHT KINGSTUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O. (REVIEW PLANS)5. ALL INTERNAL HEADERS & BEAMS SHALL HAVE(1)2X6 OR (1)2X4 BEARING STUD ON EACH SIDE U.N.O.6. EXTERIOR SHEATHING SHALL BE 7/16" MATERIALCONSISTING OF ORIENTED STRAND BOARD (OSB).-ALLFLOOR AND CEILING SYSTEMS TO BE CHECKED ANDDESIGNED BY THE DESIGNATED MANUFACTURER.FLOOR PLANS TO BE ON SITE.7. HEADER SIZES ARE TO BE USED PERPLAN AND DEVIATION FROM ANY SIZE MUST BEAPPROVED BY DESIGNERS.8. PRESSURE TREADED WOOD IS TO BE USED WHEREWOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE AND AT 2X6MUD SILL. TREATED MEMBERS TO BE S.Y.P.#2 ORBETTER.9. FOR OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS (OR WALLS W/LATERAL LOADING:a. 0'-0" - 4'-0"= 1 JACK STUDb. 4'-0" - 8'-0"= 2 JACK STUDSc. 8'-0" - 12'-0" = 3 JACK STUDSd. GREATER THAN 12' = CONSULT ENG.10. POSTS CALLED OUT ARE NUMBER OFTRIMMER/JACK STUDS REQUIRED PER SIDE OFOPENING.1. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONSYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED FOR A 2000 P.SF. SOIL.2. FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE FULL HEIGHT ATUNBALANCED FILL GREATER THAN 3'4".3. 1/2" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 7" MINIMUM @ 6'O.C. MAX. 12" MIN, FROM EACH END. MINIMUM OF 2BOLTS IN EACH SILL PLATE (REFER TO STRUCTURALPAGES).4. PAD FOOTING REINFORCEMENT IS TO BE LOCATED(3") FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING TYP. (WHENREQUIRED)5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PAGES FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING RE-BAR/ETC.6. CCOVERSHEETSCALED PRINT @ 24X36SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION TYPE IRC-1-2020 MINNESOTA STATE RESIDENTIAL CODE-2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE MECHANICAL&FUEL GASCODE-2020 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE-2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODEDESIGNED WITH 2000 PSI SOILS, ALL FOUNDATIONCONSTRUCTION MUST FACTOR IN THIS AT A MINIMUM.DESIGNED WITH "EXPOSURE B" CLASSIFICATIONS ANDWINDGUSTS OF 115 MPH PER 2020 MN RESIDENTIAL CODEREGULATIONS.-ALL FOUNDATION WALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATIONUSED TO CONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM IS TOBE ON SITE WHEN POURING OR BUILDING WALLS.-ALL STRUCTURAL BEAMS, POSTS & TALL WALLS ARETO BE BUILT PER I-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSES ARETO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERSSPECIFICATIONS.-ALL MANUFACTURED FLOOR & ROOF TRUSSSPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE ON SITE DURINGINSTALLATION.-SH3050 EQUALS SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2646 EQUALS FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"1. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-20.2. ALL ATTIC SPACES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUMRATING OF R-49.3. ALL FLOOR SPACES OVER UNCONDITIONEDSPACE OR CANTILEVERED ARE TO BEINSULATED TO MIN. R30.Page 66 of 834b7. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION1R 5 '-6 "4'-0"2'-8 1/4"SMART PANEL DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARE CMUBASE W/STONE VENEER & 3" PRECAST CAP PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.R7'-3 1/2"4'-0"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"10'-0"8 1/4"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEMSMART PANEL DETAIL12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.12" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM PER SPEC.EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"8'-6"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4'-9 3/4"2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.HANGING PORCH LIGHTBELOW ROOF.21'-11 3/4"PANEL MATERIALPER SPEC.PITCH CHANGE1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A1FRONTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 67 of 834b8. 4'-0"4" TRIM PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIM6X6 DECK POST PER SPEC.NOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A2LEFTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 68 of 834b9. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REAR ELEVATION1PITCH CHANGE4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"36" CODE RAILING12" DECK RIM12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILINGDECK POSTSPER PLAN8'-7 1/8"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"6'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"5'-3"1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0"12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A3REARELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 69 of 834b10. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION14'-0"2'-8 1/4"4" TRIM PER SPEC.4" TRIM PER SPEC.(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER(2)2'6"X4' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKER4" TRIM PER SPEC.DECORATIVE CEDARBRACKET PER DETAIL4" TRIM PER SPEC.6" TRIM BOARD PER SPEC.METAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOFMETAL ROOF8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4"SHADOW BOARDPER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.6" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.8" FRIEZE PER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.1'X1' SOLID COLUMN ON 1'8" SQUARECMU BASE W/STONE VENEER& 3" PRECAST CAPPER DETAIL3" PRECAST CAPPER SPEC.8" FASCIA W/ 4" SHADOWBOARD PER SPEC.PITCH CHANGEPITCH CHANGESMART PANEL DETAIL5'-3"4" TRIM PER SPEC.5 1/2"10'-9 3/8"6"11'-0"EPDM FLATROOF SYSTEM5'-3"10'-1 1/8"8'-0"9'-1 1/8"8'-0"1'-8 3/4"6"3'-4"8'-9 1/2"1'-6 3/4"7'-0"12" DECK RIM36" CODE RAILING2'6"X5' FIXED WINDOWW/ BLACK BACKERNOTE:GARAGE WINDOWS TOHAVE PRIVACY TINT.36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILING8'-6"6"3'-4"5'-9 1/2"4'-3"20'-4"8'-5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"5 1/2"5'-0"3'-0"6'-0"4'-0"DECK POSTSPER PLAN1. ICE AND WATER BARRIER @ BOTTOM 6'OF ALL ROOF LINES, EXTEND BARRIERMIN. 3' ON EACH SIDE OF VALLEY,COVER ENTIRE FACE OF ROOFSADDLES. VERIFY ADDITIONALLOCATIONS OF ICE AND WATERBARRIER AS NEEDED IN FIELD.2. PROVIDE ROOF AND SOFFIT VENTS PERIRC CODE REGULATIONS.3. ALL FURNACE FLUES, PLUMBING VENTS,FIREPLACE VENTS, AND OTHERPENETRATIONS THROUGH ROOF ORWALLS TO EXTEND THROUGH REAR OFHOME WHENEVER POSSIBLE.4. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGHEXTERIOR WALLS OR ROOFING MUSTBE SEALED AND FLASHED PERMANUFACTURE. SPECIFICATIONS ANDIRC CODE REGULATIONS.5. SUPPLY AT LEAST 6" OF SPACEBETWEEN BOTTOMS OF WINDOWS ANDROOFS.ROOFS.6. ALL BEAMS HOLDING UP PORCH ROOFSARE TO BE DROPPED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.7. SUPPLY DRIPCAPS ON ALL WINDOWSAND DOORS.8. ALL EXTERIOR TRIM TO BE FLASHEDPER CODE.9. SUPPLY SEPARATION BETWEEN WOOD,COMPOSITE WOOD, AND ANY OTHERWOOD MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS.10. HOLD STONE OFF GRADE MINIMUM OF3" OR PER TRADE SPECIFICATIONS.11. REFER TO MANUFACTURESPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE.12. GARAGE BUCK BOARD MATERIAL IS TOBE COMPOSITE WOOD AND SIZED TOCOVER THE EDGE OF STONE.13. GRADE CONDITIONS MAY VARY ON SITE.BASE3" PRE-CAST CONCRETECAP EXTENDED 2" PASTEDGES OF STONE BELOWMIN. (1)#4 REBAR DOWELEXTENDED THROUGH BASE12" CMU BLOCK, FILLED (OR)POURED IN PLACE BASETO HEIGHT NOTED ONEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTEND DOWEL 4" INTO FOUNDATIONOR SLAB BELOW (OR) ANCHORPER MASON DETAILSTONE FINISH AT SIDESOF COLUMN PER EXTERIORS3/4" = 1'-0" 12"X12" COLUMN OVER 1'8" SQUARE STONE BASE DETAIL3CEILING/DROPPEDBEAM PER PLAN8" TRIM BOARDMETAL CONNECTOR@ TOP12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.SECTIONTOPCENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN.12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.METAL CONNECTOR@ BASE8" TRIM BOARD12" COLUMN FINISHMATERIAL PER SPEC.@ ALL SIDES.2X FRAMING AT MIDDLETO SUPPORT FINISHES.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.CENTER POST, VERIFYWITH PLAN, MAY BE ATCORNER.2' X 2' BRACKET MADE OF6" X 6" CEDAR W/ 45o ANGLEDCENTER ELEMENT, W/ 2" 45oCHAMFER ENDS AS SHOWN- PER SPECSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2'X2' DECORATIVE BRACKET245.0°-MATERIAL: SMART-SIDING,VERIFY W/ SPEC.-MATERIAL: COMPOSITE,VERIFY W/ SPEC.DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A4RIGHTELEVATIONSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 70 of 834b11. 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)P.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACING36" CODE RAILING36" CODE RAILINGUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGNOTE:DECK FOOTINGS SIZED TOACCOMODATE FUTUREROOF OVER PORCH.FTG/POST A: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST B: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 24" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FTG/POST C: 6X6 POST W/ SIMPSON BASE CONNECTION &METAL CONNECTOR TO BEAM ABV. W/12" SONO-TUBE W/ 26" SPREAD BASE TO FROST DEPTH.FOOTING NOTES:BACKFILL W/ GRAVEL/SANDCOMPACTED FILL BELOW FOOTINGSUP (17) EQ. R.& 10" TREADSW/ 1" NOSINGF.D.RADON -UP 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C.SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)F.D. 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.) 18" FLOOR TRUSS, MIN. L/480,19.2" O.C. SPACING (VERIFY W/ TRUSS MANUF.)C JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC J6"8"8"6"8"8"8"8"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"6"10"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"10"6"8"6"8"10"1'-0"6"8"4'-3"3'-2"36'-3"43'-8"1'-0"57'-2"22'-0"15'-9 1/4"6'-0"2 3/4"123'-10"9'-8"6'-6"6'-6"2'-0"1'-10"18'-0"1'-10"8"9'-0"1'-4"8"9'-0"1'-4"21'-8"11'-0"11'-2"6'-0"11'-0"1'-0"11'-10"16'-0"10'-6"1'-0"2'-8"55'-10"6"6"8"10"5'-10"6'-0"10'-1"5'-11"5'-0 3/4"5'-5 1/4"4'-0"101'-10"24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.9'-0"9'-0"10'-9 1/4"11'-3 1/4"4'-8 1/2"12'-3"16'-11 1/2"22'-0 1/2"39'-0"2'-0"18'-0"59'-0"9 1/4"7'-6 1/2"2 3/4"8'-0"12'-4"15'-9 1/4"2 3/4"4'-0"16'-0"2'-0"4'-0"13'-9 1/2"9'-4 1/2"11'-5"8"2'-8"2'-6"1'-1 1/2"2'-6"3'-10 3/4"8'-0"18'-5 3/4"6'-5 1/2"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"8"9'-8"12'-0"3'-11"3'-6"3'-6"2'-2"5'-7"36'-8"61'-4"6'-7"5'-0"8"7"17'-4"2'-6"8"11'-11"6'-0"17'-3"4'-8 1/2"11"5'-3"2'-2"1'-1"10'-11"6'-1 1/2"8"2'-10"7'-7"2'-6"8 1/2"5'-4"11'-1"3'-7 1/2"7'-10"3'-10"10"11'-6"1'-2"8"8"8"23'-9"8"8"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.36" CODE RAILING20'-4"37'-8"1'-0"2 3/4"7'-10 3/4"9'-8"2 3/4"18'-0"20" X 8" CONT.SPREAD FTG.7 1/4"5 1/2"7 1/4"4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULARCOMPACTED FILL4" CONCRETE SLAB W/FIBERMESH REINFORCEMENTOVER COMPACTED FILL4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER DROPPED 1'-4 3/4"6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIEROVER 6" GRANULAR COMPACTED FILLSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3190 FINISHED SQUARE FEET / 147 UNFINISHED SQUARE FEET FOUNDATION PLAN1MIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERMIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERFOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE, ORWALKOUTS HAVE CANTILEVEREDSILLS.FOUNDATIONS @ LIVING/BASEMENTAREAS ARE HELD IN 2" WITH A 2X8SILL PLATE OVER 2" EXT. FOAMINSULATION PER DETAILS. AREASADJACENT TO STOOPS, GARAGE,OR WALKOUTS HAVECANTILEVERED SILLS.REFER TO SECTIONS FORADDITIONAL SPANCRETEINFORMATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION8" SPAN-CRETE FLOORING ABOVE4" FOAM & 6" TOP COATING ABOVE W/2X FRAMING BELOW FOR INSULATION1D11D22D11D3/D4(3)2X6 STUDSBETWEEN WINDOWS(2)11-7/8" 2.0E LVLDROPPED BEAM ABV.28"X28"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL DROPPED BEAM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVL FLUSH BEAM ABV.XPOINT LOADSFROM ABV.(2)9-1/2" 2.0E LVLFLUSH BEAM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGPOINT LOADFROM ABV.28"X28"X12" PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.36"X36"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.30"X30"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGXFUTURE POINTLOAD FROM ABV.POINT LOADS FROM ABV.42"X42"X16" SPREAD FOOTING W/ (4)#4REBAR DOWELS GOING BOTH DIRECTIONSIN BOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING40"X40"X16" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTINGX28"X28"X12" PADFOOTINGSP.T. 2X12 JOISTS12" O.C. SPACINGFTG/POST"A"(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"A"FTG/POST"C"(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAM(2)P.T. 2X12 FLUSH BEAMFTG/POST"B"FTG/POST"B"8"8"8"28"X28"X12"PAD FOOTINGXPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.34"X34"X14" SPREAD FOOTINGW/ (4)#4 REBAR DOWELSGOING BOTH DIRECTIONS INBOTTOM 1/3 OF FOOTING24"X24"X12"PAD FOOTINGPOINT LOAD FROM ABV.X4'-8"MIN. 4" DIA. FTG DRAIN TILEW/ 2" MIN. GRANULAR BASE& 8" MIN. GRANULAR COVERHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 8"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSHATCH INDICATES MID-HEIGHT 6"CURB, REFER TO CROSS SECTIONSFOR ADDITIONAL DETAILSFLOOR DRAIN UNDERDROPPED BOWLING ALLEY TOBE CONNECTED TO SUMPCONFIRM BOWLING ALLEYTROUGH SIZE WITH BOWLINGALLEY MANUFACTURER86'-0"1'-8 1/2"1'-6"12'-7 1/2"STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP FULL FOUNDATION WALLDOWN TO LOOKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.STEP LOOKOUT FOUNDATIONWALL DOWN TO WALKOUT HEIGHT.VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD.24" X 12" CONT.SPREADFTG. W/ (2) #5 CONT., MIN.TEMP.10" CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLL W/ #5'S VERTICAL@ 18" O.C. AND #4'S HORIZONTAL @ 24" O.C.,MINIMUM. (OFFESET TO INSIDE FACE, TYPICAL.)2"2'-6"10"6"1. FOUNDATIONS TO BE POURED PER SITE SOIL CONDITION2. ALL REINFORCING IS TO BE INSTALLED PER IRCREGULATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY CONCRETETRADES.3. PROVIDE 12" ANCHOR BOLTS EMBEDDED 8" MIN., SPACEDPER CODE AND 12" MAX FROM EACH END OF SILL PLATE,MIN 2 PER SILL. REFER TO COVER SHEET.4. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS PER PLAN, JOIST TO CONSISTOF HIDDEN ZIP STRIP EMBEDDED INTO THE SLABS.5. ALL ANGLED WALLS ARE TO BE 45 DEGREES UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.6. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS WITHIN 5' OFDRAINS.7. ALL WOOD MATERIAL CONTACTING DIRECTLY TOCONCRETE MUST BE TREATED.8. PROVIDE DRAIN TILE AROUND PERIMETER AS SHOWN.LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE ASSUMED TO BE 30 PSF/FT.9.-SH3'X5' =SINGLE HUNG 3'0" BY 5'0"-FX2'6"X2'6" = FIXED 2'6" BY 4'6"-CASE3'X5' = CASEMENT 3'0" BY 5'0"-2'8"X6'8" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL-2'8"X8'0" @ DOOR =2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR 110V, INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTOR / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR COMBO EXHAUST FANSDSD1. FOR EASE OF UNDERSTANDING GRADE IS CONSIDERED0'0" ON THIS FOUNDATION PLAN2. ALL STAIRWAYS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) ARE TO BEILLUMINATED AT EACH LANDING PER CODE3. SUPPLY CONTINUOUS HANDRAIL PER CODE AT ALLSTAIR LOCATIONS, CODE HANDRAIL IS TO CONTINUE TOLANDINGS/ TOP & BOTTOM OF STAIRS. CONTRACTOR &INSTALLER TO VERIFY IF ADDITIONAL GRASPABLEHANDRAIL IS INSTALLED OR IF DECORATIVE HANDRAILTO CONTINUE.4. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TO BE APPLIED TO UNDERSIDE OFSTAIRS PER CODE.5. INDICATES INTERIOR BEARING WALL,16" O.C. STUDS6. PERMANENTLYATTACHED LADDER PER CODE & MINIMUM 3'X3' EGRESSAREA BUILT PER IRC7. FILL EGRESS WELL W/GRAVEL BACKFILL & INSTALL DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONTO DRAIN EGRESS PROPERLY.8. INSTALL DRAFT STOPPING WITHIN FLOOR SYSTEM PERIRC CODE SECTION 302.12, MIN. 12" GYPSUM BOARD (OR) 38"STRUCTURAL BOARD ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY 2X4MIN. MATERIAL, PARALLEL WITH FLOOR FRAMING,SEPARATING AREAS WITH MAXIMUM SPACE OF 1000SQ.FT.-SEPARATE INTO EQUAL SPACES.1. ALL HEADERS TO BE SUPPORTED BY A MINIMUM OF (1) TRIMMER.(UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)2. ALL HEADERS TO HAVE AT LEAST (1) KING STUD (UNLESS NOTED).3. ALL STUD CALLOUTS @ SIDES OF WINDOWS/DOORS ARE TRIMMERS,MINIMUM (1) KING STUDS @ SAID LOCATIONS TO BE INCLUDED ASWELL.4. BLOCKING @ ROOF & FLOOR PLAN PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER.5. POINT LOADS TO BE CARRIED THROUGH FLOOR AREAS AND DOWNTO FOUNDATION FOR SUPPORT. USE SAME MATERIAL AS COLUMNSUPPORTING MEMBER ABOVE.6. ALL HANGERS & CONNECTORS PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER,SUPPLIERS & CONTRACTOR.7. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO BE 7/16" OSB OR PLYWOOD SHEATHING& NAILED PER CODE (MAY BE REFERRED TO AS 1/2" NOMINALTHICKNESS).8. ROOF DECKING TO BE 12" NOMINAL (OR 1532") OSB DECKING W/ CLIPS,NAILED TO ROOF FRAMING W/ MIN. 8d COMMON NAILS, 6" O.C. @EDGES/12"O.C. @ FIELD.9. FLOOR DECKING TO BE 34" PLYWOOD DECKING, NAILED OR SCREWEDTO FLOOR SYSTEM PER CODE W/ ADHESIVE PER SPEC. (OR) MIN. 6dCOMMON NAILS 6" O.C. @ EDGES/12" O.C. @ FIELD (CODE MINIMUM).10. REFER TO WALL BRACING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMINGINFORMATION.PROJECT # PROJECT # 25328www.SafeHavenSE.comDerek O Phillips5-28-2025 47507DRAWING TITLE:5−28−25LOCATION:PAGEPAGE DESCRIPTION:L DLITTFINDESIGN.COMMLITTFIN@HOTMAIL.COM320−224−7844WINSTED, MNCURRENTDATE:REVISION:REV. DATE:©ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWNARE THE PROPERTY OF LITTFINDESIGN. USE OF THESE PLANSON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOTOTHER THAN NOTED ON THISTITLEBLOCK WITHOUT THEWRITTEN CONSENT OF LITTFINDESIGN IS PROHIBITED.REVISED PER BUILDER/ADDED SPORT COURT2-20-25BOWLING ALLEY DETAILS UPDATED5-15-25LOOKOUT FOUNDATION WALLS UPDATED5-21-25THIS PLAN PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR A PROJECT TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AS WELL AS ANY LOCAL CODES. CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR TRADES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, PENALTIES FOR CODE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION OR BUILDING PROCESS VIOLATIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORSMADE DURING DESIGN, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION PHASES. ANY AND ALL SITE REVIEW IS TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS SUCH AS THE CONTRACTOR, OWNER, SURVEYOR, OR OTHER TRADES RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. LITTFIN DESIGN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTOR/TRADE ERRORS, UNKNOWN CODE ADJUSTMENTS AT THE TIME OF PLAN CREATION OR CONSTRUCTION.STRUCTURE UPDATED PER ENGINEER'S REDLINES5-28-25A6FOUNDATIONPLANSCALED PRINT @ 24X36Page 71 of 834b12. 4.c Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 22, 2025 Agenda Item: CASE No. 2025-13 Conditional Use Permit Application of St. Augustine School for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a middle and secondary school located at 1345 Mendota Heights Road Department: Community Development Contact: Sarah Madden, Community Development Manager Introduction: St. Augustine School is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the property located at 1345 Mendota Heights Road. The CUP would allow for the use of the space as a middle and secondary private school, or 6th-12th grades, at the former Sanford Brown College site, within the space previously used by Interim Use Permit in 2017-2019 for Minnehaha Academy. This item is being presented under a duly noticed public hearing process. A notice on this item was published in the Pioneer Press newspaper; and notice letters of this hearing were mailed to all owners within 350-feet of the affected parcel. No public comments have been received as of the submittal of this report. Background: The former Brown College site consists of two separate legal parcels of 2.74 and 2.72 acres, or 5.46 acres total. The entire site is owned by Mendota Tech Center LLC. The property contains an original designed office building of 56,650 sq. ft., which was leased and occupied entirely by Brown College as one of its metro wide college facilities up until 2017. In 2017, following the damage to Minnehaha Academy, they moved into this space under an Interim Use Permit and made modifications to the space to accommodate their school use. The space has been vacant since Minnehaha Academy returned to their permanent home. The site is bounded by Mendota Heights Road to the north, Enterprise Drive to the east, and Northland Drive to the south. Various warehouse uses and office uses surround the site. The subject property is zoned B-1 General Business, and is currently guided I-Industrial in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The site is part of the overall area proposed to be reguided to Business in the City’s Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Planning Case 2025-02) which is currently pending Metropolitan Council review. Staff does not see a conflict with the Comprehensive Plan for the proposed school use to be reinstated. The building is currently set-up for a typical classroom arrangement, and the applicant has indicated that no major modifications to the building are needed for their anticipated school use. The subject site contains up to 270 surface parking spaces. St. Augustine School is a new school initiative and has an anticipated total enrollment of 40 students which would attend school at this site. Page 72 of 83 Analysis: Pursuant to Title 12-5B-5, the city recognizes that the development and execution of Zoning Code is based upon the division of the city into districts within which regulations are specified. It is further recognized that there are special or conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public need for the particular location. To provide for these needs, the city may approve a conditional use for those uses and purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to ensure that the purpose and intent of this chapter is effectively carried out. The City may grant a conditional use provided the proposed use demonstrates the following: a) Use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, b) Use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, c) Use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value, and d) Use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. A-C) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; will not cause serious traffic congestion or hazards; nor depreciate surrounding property value. Staff Response: The proposed conditional use permit at the subject property would not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community, as an upper level grade school has successfully operated in this location previously, and would function or operate very similarly to the prior Interim Use, and the previous Brown College use. The applicant has indicated that the proposed use is a small school engaged in general education activities within the existing office-style building, and has no anticipated detrimental impacts. The City anticipates that traffic levels will be less than what was experienced when Minnehaha Academy took use of the space with an estimated enrollment of 350 students, and significantly less than when the Brown College classes were in full session with a larger number of commuting attendees. The applicant has indicated that no bussing will be taking place, and that given the small number of students, the allocated parking spaces for drop-off/pick-up are sufficient for their anticipated demand. A school typically has an early morning and mid-afternoon peak hour or traffic. The subject site has access points from all three abutting roadway systems, allowing for an ease of access to the site, and the applicant has indicated 22 parking stalls which would be set aside for regular school use. There is ample parking on site for the proposed use and anticipated enrollment. Staff does not believe that these peak travel movements by parent, teacher, or student drivers, will cause any negative impacts to the existing traffic in this office and warehousing based area; nor pose a threat to the surrounding business/uses. City Code requires all schools, including high schools, to provide at least 1 space for each 7 students, plus 1 space for each 3 classroom. The applicant has indicated that St. Augustine School will serve up to 40 students at this location, meaning that eight spaces would be required for the use, including the calculation for the six classrooms illustrated on the Space Use plan within this Suite 700 allocated for the school use. With the number of existing parking spaces on site, there is no concern for a need to provide additional dedicated parking Page 73 of 83 or student drop-off areas beyond what has been provided by the applicant. D. The proposed use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the city code and comprehensive plan, including all applicable performance standards, so as not to be in conflict on an on-going basis. Staff Response: The subject property is within the overall area which was rezoned from I- Industrial to B-1 General Business as part of the implementation of the City’s Zoning Code Update project, which went into effect on January 1st of this year. Following the completion of that project, the City initiated a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application to re-guide the corresponding area to B-Business in the City’s 2040 Land Use guide plan. This amendment application is still pending the Metropolitan Council’s review. Staff does not see any conflicts within the existing or proposed land use guidance for this school use. Currently, the subject property is guided I-Industrial in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan provides the following goal statement: Goal 3: Encourage and support industrial and commercial development in designated areas. 1. The city will use available resources to identify redevelopment needs. This will include cooperation with Dakota County and the Metropolitan Council to achieve redevelopment objectives. 2. Transitions between adjoining land uses will be required for adjacent residential uses, and will be encouraged between compatible land uses (e.g. transition between a general manufacturing and retail use will be encouraged). 3. Amenities within the industrial and commercial districts will be encouraged to promote a more vibrant and attractive place for workers. The former Brown College use (and the adjacent Le Cordon Bleu cooking school) functioned and operated successfully for a number of years within this Industrial guidance category. The Industrial land use category is described in the existing 2040 Comprehensive Plan as a concentration within the city’s industrial and business park and includes manufacturing, office, warehousing, hotels, and other commercial uses. This area has previously supported educational uses, thus staff has determined that this location for the middle and secondary school use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the City Code and Comprehensive Plan and performance standards. Alternatives: 1.Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit request, based on the findings of fact that the proposed school use complies with the policies and standards of the City Code and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, with conditions; 2.Recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit request, based on the findings of fact that the proposed school use is not in compliance with the City Code and is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan; or 3.Table the request and request additional information from staff and/or the applicant; Staff will extend the review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota State Statute 15.99. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit request from St. Augustine School for a middle and secondary (private) school at 1345 Mendota Heights Road, based on the findings of fact that the proposed project complies with the policies and standards of the City Code and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, with the following conditions: Page 74 of 83 1. All parking for the multi-tenant building must be accommodated on site. Any indication that the site is under parked may result in required amendments to the Site Plan and/or the Conditional Use Permit. 2. Any new remodeling or interior work (including building, electrical, plumbing, heating/cooling and other related work must be submitted for standard building permit review prior to any work being started. Attachments: 1.Findings of Fact for Approval 2.Site Location Map 3.Letter of Intent 4.St. Augustine School - Supplemental 5.1345 Mendota Heights Road Suite 700, Mendota Heights Floor Plan 6.St. Augustine School Space Usage Mendota Heights 7.St. Augustine School Parking Map Page 75 of 83 Planning Case 2025-13 (CUP for 1345 Mendota Heights Road) Page 1 of 1 FINDINGS-OF-FACT FOR APPROVAL CUP – Conditional Use Permit for 1345 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 700 The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed requests: 1. The proposed school use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor will cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor depreciate surrounding property values. 2. The proposed school use conforms to the general purpose and intent of this code and comprehensive plan, including all applicable performance standards, provided all conditions are met and upheld by the property owner and applicant. 3. With the conditions included herein, the site will provide adequate parking for the proposed use and existing building. All parking will be accommodated on-site and no adverse impacts off-site are anticipated to traffic flow on the surrounding roadway network. Page 76 of 83 4c1. 666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 666 6666666 66666666666666666666 66666666666666666666666666666666666666! !!! " " " " "" " " !"" " ³³ " ³ "" ³ ³ ! ³ ³ ³ ³ ³ ! " "" ³ * * " " " " " "" ! ³" " ³ ! " " ! " " " " " " " !! ³ * ³³ ³! ³ ³ * *** *" ! " ³³ ³ ³³³³³³"* * * ! !! 6 6 6666666666666FMFM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM FM F M FM FM 666666!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !.!. !. !. !!2 !. 2520 1380 1352 1355 1333 1312 1345 1340 1335 1370 1369 1330 1300 1295 1385 2520 NORTHLAND DR MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD ENTERPRISE DRPILOT KNOB RD RAMP Nearmap US Inc, Dakota County, MN Site Location/Aerial Map1345 Mendota Heights Road Date: 7/18/2025 City ofMendotaHeights0200 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 77 of 83 4c2. 24 June 2025 To Whom it May Concern, Thank you for considering our conditional use permit for the 1345 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 700 (former Minnehaha Academy space). Below is an overview of the school, as well as an analysis of key items outlined in the “Conditional Use Permit Application Checklist” supplied online at the City of Mendota Heights website. St. Augustine School is a 6th-12th grade classical, liberal arts school in the Catholic tradition (launching with grades 6th-10th). It is a co-ed school with single sex instruction, focused on a pedagogy that goes slower and deeper into its curriculum, inculcating in its students a love of learning that sets them up to lead joyful, flourishing lives. It is led by Head of School Dr. Matt Briel, and Deans Mrs. Ellie Peters and Mr. Steve Hendrickson. More information can be found at www.staugustineschoolmn.org. It is a Minnesota LLC, with approved 501(c)3 non-profit status with the Internal Revenue Service. Here is an overview addressing specific concerns / topics outlined in “Conditional Use Permit Application Checklist”: 1.The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community a.The use, as outlined above, is a small (micro) school that will be engaging in standard educational activities that are not detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. 2.The proposed use will not cause serious tra]ic congestion nor hazards a.There will be no serious tra]ic congestions or hazards associated with the operation of St. Augustine School. 3.The proposed use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value a.The St. Augustine School will not have a detrimental e]ect on the surrounding property value 4.The proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the comprehensive plan. a.Use of the space as a school is allowed under the current zoning guidelines (with a Conditional Use Permit), and will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the comprehensive plan. As you prepare to review our CUP, please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, William Faulkner Board Chair, St. Augustine School www.staugustineschoolmn.org • info@staugustineschoolmn.org Page 78 of 83 4c3. www.staugustineschoolmn.org • info@staugustineschoolmn.org 2 July 2025 Ms. Sarah Madden Community Development Manager City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms. Madden, Thank you for considering our conditional use permit for the 1345 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 700. Per the questions in your email of 2 July 2025, please find answers below in red. At this time, we are marking the application as incomplete, based on the following items from the Conditional Use Permit checklist: •Dimensioned “typical” floor plan and “typical” room plan Please see attached “Saint Augustine School Space Usage Mendota Heights - (Gray Area).pdf” •Vehicular circulation on site, and use of available parking spaces Please see attached “St Augustine School Parking Map.pdf” Specifically, we need additional detail on the plans to evaluate this proposal and make a determination on the minimum parking which would be required for just this use within the shared parking in this development, and overall traNic impacts from additional trips and the potential for any bussing or drop- oN queues (there is no bussing taking place. Given the small number of enrollees, the allocated parking spaces for dropoN/pickup are believed to be suNicient for our use and to manage dropoN/pickup dynamics). Parking demand is calculated based on the occupancy of individual rooms and uses. The graphic illustrating the leasing brochure for 4,825 square feet is not suNicient for reviewing this information. Has your architect prepared preliminary floor plans for the space? (we are using the space “as-is” and so do not plan any changes to the space). I understand this space was remodeled as part of a prior Interim Use Permit, but this would be for a permanent use – are there walls or rooms that are proposed to change? (No proposed changes to the space). •Please provide a Floor Plan of the proposed space detailing the use of each room. What modifications are proposed to the space to accommodate the school? See attached “Saint Augustine School Space Usage Mendota Heights - (Gray Area).pdf”. No modifications are proposed. •Are there cafeteria or food preparation needs? No •Please provide a parking and/or drop -oN plan for the school. Currently you are proposing 10th grade in the upcoming school year, but this Conditional Use Permit approves the entire lifespan of the school. Where will students park if they are driving themselves to school? Note Page 79 of 83 4c4. www.staugustineschoolmn.org • info@staugustineschoolmn.org any reserved or designated parking areas that the building owner will provide. If students are being bussed into the school, what route through the property will they take? Will there be a drop-oN or unloading zone? Please see attached “St Augustine School Parking Map.pdf”. No bussing will be used. •What are the projected enrollment numbers at capacity for the space? The Fire Marshall will need to evaluate the occupancy of this space, and the Building ONicial at a later building permit date. Enrollment is planned for no more than 40. Current enrollment is significantly less than that. Also, thank you for letting us know about the retail cannabis site. We do not have concerns at this time. Please let me know if you have any additional questions, including calling me at 651-343-6370 William Faulkner Board Chair, St. Augustine School Page 80 of 83 Direct Entry, Newly Remodeled Office Sublease 1345 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights MN 55120 Mark Young D: 651-233-2435 | M: 651-307-2371 Zac Houle D: 651-209-0520 | M: 651-248-7567 7250 Hudson Boulevard N, Suite 160, Oakdale, MN 55128 www.crossroadspropeties.net FOR LEASE FLOOR PLAN – SUITE 600 & 700 (9,939 SF) SUITE 600 MAIN ENTRANCE (5,114 SF) SUITE 700 MAIN ENTRANCE (4,825 SF) COMMON EXIT 5,114 SF 4,825 SF Page 81 of 83 4c5. reception coatroom storage meeting / common purpose room conf. roomclassroom study space common lounge student ccommons faculty offices classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom Page 82 of 83 4c6. Imagery ©2025 , Map data ©2025 Google 20 ft 12 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SAINT AUGUSTINE SCHOOL PARKING MAP E n t r a n c e Student Drop offFaculty ParkingMisc. Parking Misc. Parking Page 83 of 83 4c7.