2024-11-19 City Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
November 19, 2024 at 7:00 PM
Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3.Pledge of Allegiance
4.Approval of the Agenda
The Council, upon majority vote of its members, may make additions or deletions to the
agenda. These items may be submitted after the agenda preparation deadline.
5.Public Comments - for items not on the agenda
Public comments provide an opportunity to address the City Council on items which are not
on the meeting agenda. All are welcome to speak. Individuals should address their
comments to the City Council as a whole, not individual members. Speakers are requested
to come to the podium and must state their name and address. Comments are limited to
three (3) minutes. No action will be taken; however, the Mayor and Council may ask
clarifying questions as needed or request staff to follow up.
6.Consent Agenda
Items on the consent agenda are approved by one motion of the City Council. If a
councilmember requests additional information or wants to make a comment on an item,
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Items
removed from the consent agenda will be taken up as the next order of business.
a.Approve Minutes from the October 30, 2024, City Council Meeting
b.Approve Minutes from the November 6, 2024, City Council Meeting
c.Approve Minutes from the November 12, 2024, City Council Work Session
d.Approve Minutes from the November 12, 2024, Special City Council Meeting
Page 1 of 89
e.Approve 2025 Tobacco License Renewal
f.Approve Massage Therapist License
g.Approve Purchase Order for Victoria Road Storm Sewer Improvement
h.Resolution 2024-67 Approving Support for a Noise Wall along Victoria Road
i.Resolution 2024-72 Certifying Delinquent Sewer Accounts
j.Resolution 2024-73 Certifying Delinquent Water Accounts
k.Acknowledge September 2024 Fire Synopsis
l.Approve Claims List
7.Presentations
a.Metro Transit Network Now Concept Plan
8.Public Hearings
9.New and Unfinished Business
a.Accept the Retirement of Fire Chief Dave Dreelan and Appoint Dan Johnson as Fire
Chief
b.Pavement Rehabilitation Approach for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood
Improvements
10.Community / City Administrator Announcements
11.City Council Comments
12.Adjourn
Next Meeting
December 3 at 7:00PM
Information is available in alternative formats or with the use of auxiliary aids to individuals
with disabilities
upon request by calling city hall at 651-452-1850 or by
emailing cityhall@mendotaheightsmn.gov.
Regular meetings of the City Council are cablecast on
NDC4/Town Square Television Cable Channel 18/HD798 and online at
TownSquare.TV/Webstreaming
Page 2 of 89
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Wednesday, October 30, 2024
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilors Mazzitello and Paper, were also present.
Councilors Lorberbaum and Miller were absent.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No one from the public wished to be heard.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval.
Councilor Paper moved approval of the consent agenda as presented.
a. Approval of October 15, 2024, City Council Minutes
b. Approval of October 15, 2024, Council Work Session Minutes
c. Resolution 2024-63 Amending the 2024 Pay Classification Plan for Non-Union Employees
d. Approve 2025 Fourth of July Fireworks
e. Approve Police Department Out-of-State Training Request
f. Accept Grant for the Mendota Heights Police Department Police Cadet Program
g. Approve Purchase Orders for the City Hall AV/Cablecast Room Relocation
h. Approve Plat Correction for the Springman Addition
i. Approve Purchase of a Buffalo Turbine Blower
j. Approval of Claims List
6.a
Page 3 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 8
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
PRESENTATIONS
A) CANNABIS ORDINANCE
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a presentation and stated that the Council is
asked to provide direction on drafting an ordinance regulating cannabis business operations within the
city, in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 342.
Councilor Paper asked about the definition of minor performance standard.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided some examples of what would be use specific
standards, such as signage, lighting, and hours. She stated that those standards would need to be
comparable to other similar uses that are allowed by Code.
Councilor Paper asked if $1,000 is the license fee that can be charged.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden commented that the license fee is either that flat
amount or a percentage of the State fee, whichever is lesser.
Councilor Paper asked why there is such a discrepancy in what can be charged for a cannabis license
versus a liquor license.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that she did not have an answer for that.
Councilor Paper asked if a microbusiness is similar to a brew pub. He asked if any of the potential
businesses that could be licensed would be a place where people could purchase and consume cannabis.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden explained how micro and mezzo businesses are
differentiated by the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), in that micro means one and mezzo means
multiple. She stated that in regard to onsite consumption, she was unsure but noted that there are THC
drinks sold at breweries that can be consumed onsite.
Councilor Paper referenced the proposed buffers and asked how a school is defined, referencing music
schools.
Police Chief Kelly McCarthy stated that typically onsite consumption is not allowed for a retail business.
She stated that consumption could occur under a festival permit. She stated that a school would be defined
as a public institution, or private school, rather than simply a place where children are educated.
Councilor Paper recognized that the City must allow for at least one retail business, even if it chose to
operate a municipal dispensary. He asked if there would be an opportunity for a public/private partnership
that would allow the City to gain funds that could then be used for the park system.
Councilor Mazzitello agreed that it could be an option for the City to diversify its revenues. He stated that
he was not specifically speaking about operating a municipal dispensary but collecting fees and taxes.
Mayor Levine commented that would be limited to what is allowed by the State.
Page 4 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 8
Councilor Mazzitello stated that he would be interested in exploring the opportunity of how the City could
generate revenue from this.
Mayor Levine confirmed the consensus of the Council in just allowing one retail license and not requiring
a specific distance between locations, noting a dispensary across the border in Eagan.
Councilor Mazzitello asked how city boundaries come into play, noting the location of a school near the
Lilydale border and asked if the buffer restrictions for a school would still come into play if the school is
in Mendota Heights and the dispensary is in Lilydale.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided an example of buffering on a map.
Mayor Levine asked if the mixed-use PUD at Highway 62 and Dodd Road could be excluded from
allowing this use.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden confirmed that it could be excluded and the use could
not be listed in the allowed uses for the MU-PUD zoning district. She stated that currently liquor stores
and tobacco shops are allowed as conditional uses within that zoning district, which is why she had
suggested adding cannabis retailers as a conditional use since they would be similar types of businesses.
Mayor Levine commented that she believed that the use would be better suited to the business or industrial
zones. She stated that she would also not want to stop a brewery from coming into Mendota Heights
because they would not be able to sell THC drinks.
Councilor Mazzitello asked if there is a difference in the license required to sell smokable cannabis and
selling a THC beverage.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the OCM outlines the 13 types of licenses
and one of those is the lower potency hemp retailer, which is where THC drinks would fall.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that he would not want to prohibit a brewery from taking the endcap in the
Plaza but would not want a dispensary there. He stated that he would agree with tying cannabis retailers
to the same areas where tobacco and alcohol sales can occur, with the exception of the MU-PUD.
Councilor Paper commented that the City has to let the businesses in and if a business comes to town, he
wants it to be successful. He commented that he also is not the expert on the best location for this type of
business and asked for input from public safety.
Police Chief Kelly McCarthy replied that it makes no difference to public safety officers. She was unsure
ethically how allowing a brewery in one location would be fine, but that location would not be desired for
a cannabis retailer. She stated that both uses are legal. She stated that the destruction that alcohol has
brought to their community is one million-fold over cannabis. She stated that location does not matter
and if there is concern with clandestine activity, the best choice is to keep it in a well-traveled area rather
than tucking it away. She stated that Community Development Manager Sarah Madden is the expert on
where those businesses should or should not be located.
Councilor Paper agreed that it makes sense not to tuck it into a corner.
Mayor Levine commented that there are business parks and industrial areas that are not tucked away.
Page 5 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 8
Councilor Paper echoed the comment from Police Chief Kelly McCarthy that legal is legal, even though
someone may not like it. He stated that if beer, wine and liquor are allowed he was unsure why cannabis
would be different as alcohol is also a mind-altering substance.
Mayor Levine commented that she cannot explain why, but there is a difference perhaps of the history
and tradition. She stated that she has been in cities where cannabis is legal. She commented that a person
could not come out of the store and smoke the product, similar to how someone could not come out of the
liquor store and drink the alcohol. She noted that the smoking of cannabis is also not allowed in parks,
on trails or while driving in vehicles.
Councilor Paper asked if the hours of operation should align with liquor stores.
Councilor Mazzitello asked if there is a difference in the hours of operation for a liquor store and tobacco
shop.
Mayor Levine confirmed the consensus of the Council that the hours of operation should align with liquor
and tobacco sales, whichever is the most restrictive.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that there are signage, lighting and odor mitigation regulations in the
business and industrial districts that could be utilized. He believed that the buffer from schools and other
allowed uses should be maximized. He also believed that the City should limit the number of licenses to
one. He stated that if the City would need to allow a second license at a population of 12,501, he would
then want to see the maximum distance between uses established as well.
Mayor Levine commented that she did not believe the City was at risk of going over the population
threshold. She stated that she would not want to place the distance buffer into effect because that would
limit a retailer from going into the area adjacent to the Eagan border.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that while he would agree the industrial park could use new businesses,
he was unsure how he felt about manufacturing.
Councilor Paper commented that it is a legal crop and would therefore be no different than hydroponic
tomatoes.
Mayor Levine referenced the administrative fines section and asked if cities are able to impose civil
penalties.
City Attorney Amy Schmidt commented that would be allowed in some circumstance and not allowed in
other circumstances, dependent upon the authority provided by the State.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that he would like to set the administrative fines at the maximum
allowed.
Mayor Levine commented that she would like to try to be consistent, to the extent possible, with
neighboring communities. She stated that it is easier for businesses when there are consistent regulations
between communities. She commented that she does not want Mendota Heights to be a community where
you can smell marijuana when you are walking down the streets.
Page 6 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 8
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden referenced the proposed language related to use in
public places.
Councilor Paper commented that the community would want to attract a quality operator that is going to
do things well rather than a small business that thinks they can make a run of it. He stated that the City
would want to have a successful, professional operator.
Mayor Levine commented that it would be helpful to have input from cannabis retail operators.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that he takes objection to the fact that the State is forcing cities to allow this
without providing an option. He did not think that Mendota Heights wants this within their community
and there would still be plenty of options within a ten-minute drive. He stated that because the State is
forcing this on them, he would like to make it as restrictive as possible.
Mayor Levine commented that does not help the community. She stated that they do not get to determine
what the State forces them to do and instead should do what is fair and best. She asked if staff needs
additional guidance from the Council.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that she has received feedback on the questions,
recognizing that two members of the Council are absent tonight. She stated that she feels confident with
the feedback received and that she could bring back a draft for the Council to review at a worksession.
Councilor Paper asked when this would need to be in place.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that the moratoriums are required to expire by
January 1, 2025, and businesses would expect to begin to receive licenses in early 2025.
Mayor Levine acknowledged that Mendota Heights did not enact a moratorium and asked if that would
be an option at this time that would perhaps buy them some additional time, midway into 2025.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden replied that is not an option as the moratorium would
still need to expire by January 1, 2025.
Mayor Levine summarized the items that she would like additional information on including breweries,
how alcohol and cannabis sales work in the same area, and enforcement. She also encouraged residents
to email their thoughts to the Council to aid in the continued discussions on this topic.
PUBLIC HEARING
A) RESOLUTION 2024-62 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Mayor Levine commented that the Council will be holding the public hearing tonight but will not vote on
the resolution tonight as two members are absent, and a super majority of the Council is required for this
item. She noted that the action on this item will take place at the meeting next week.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie explained that the Council was being asked to hold the public
hearing and consider adoption of Resolution 2024-62 adopting and confirming assessments for the
Emerson Avenue Street Improvements. He acknowledged that a super majority vote is needed for this
Page 7 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 of 8
item, so staff would recommend that the action be tabled to next week following completion of the public
hearing.
Larry Poppler, TKDA, provided details on the Emerson Avenue Street Improvement project and related
assessment.
Mayor Levine asked how the final assessments compared to the estimates.
Mr. Poppler commented that there were changes to some quantities, so the residential assessments were
about $100 less and the parking bay assessment increased slightly.
Councilor Paper asked if there was engagement from the neighborhood signs that were posted.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that staff can look at the usage on the website before and
after the signs were installed.
Councilor Paper asked and received confirmation that the parking bay cost is the responsibility of the
townhome owners. He asked for more information on the interest rate and whether that changes.
Mr. Poppler stated that the interest rate is set and does not change.
Councilor Mazzitello asked the length of time in which residents could pay in advance if this is adopted
by the Council on November 6th.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie stated that residents would have 30 days from November 6th to
make a partial or full payment before interest is charged.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to open the public hearing.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Laura Doty, 1129 Ivy Hill Drive, asked how the money paid to the City in interest would be used.
Jim Mulrooney, 1140 Ivy Hill Drive, asked if the ultimate assessment cost would be altered if there were
to be rain or snow in the next few weeks.
Mayor Levine replied that would not change the assessment amount.
Fred Washburn, 598 Maple Park Drive, asked when the payment would be due if the assessment were
paid in full.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that any payment made by December 6th would not
be charged interest.
Mr. Washburn commented that the process has been very disruptive. He appreciated the insight
provided by staff, noting that he was not aware of the project website. He commented that it would have
been nice if residents could have provided their email addresses for updates.
Page 8 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 8
Jackie Ellingson, 604 Maple Park Drive, asked if there would be an opportunity to make payment in full
during year two.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker replied a resident could pay the remaining balance in full at any
time by calling the County as the amount would be certified to the County after December 6th. She
explained how interest is charged each year and the bonds are structured to finance the project and the
interest paid by residents goes towards that debt service payment. She stated that the City holds a AAA
bond rating which means that the City receives a more favorable interest rate on debt that is issued.
Chuck Kloos, 669 Laura Court, asked and received confirmation that this is structured differently than
an amortized mortgage and the balance will decrease each year.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that staff continues to look at additional methods of
communication for projects and agreed that an email list could be a great option.
Ms. Doty asked if she could anticipate that her property tax would increase as a result of this project and
assessment.
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie commented that TKDA has done appraisals in the past following
street improvement projects. He stated that a pre-project and post-project comparison in another
community, observed the property values increasing by about nine or ten percent, consistent with the
assessment amount.
There being no one further coming forward to speak, Councilor Mazzitello moved to close the public
hearing.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Councilor Mazzitello moved to table RESOLUTION NO. 2024-62 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NOVEMBER
6, 2024, CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
No items scheduled.
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming community events and activities.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilor Paper stated that he voted early at City Hall the previous day and commented on what a smooth
and efficient process that was. He thanked all the election workers.
Page 9 of 89
October 30, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Page 8 of 8
Councilor Mazzitello echoed those thanks and also thanked all that assist with election day. He
commented that regardless of who wins and loses in the election, the community is your lifeline and asked
people to be respectful and not to show hate regardless of whether their candidate wins or loses.
Mayor Levine thanked all that came out to the trick or tee event, which was held the previous weekend
and the event was very well attended at the Par 3. She commended the parks and recreation staff for the
great event. She commented that Mendota Heights has one of the highest voter turn outs in the state for
presidential elections and challenged the residents to increase that rate by voting.
ADJOURN
Councilor Paper moved to adjourn.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 3
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine
ATTEST:Mayor
_______________________________
Nancy Bauer
City Clerk
Page 10 of 89
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 6, 2024
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Paper, Mazzitello, and
Miller, were also present.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The council, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Levine requested to amend the agenda to add three prosecution services items to the consent agenda
as Items M, N, and O. Councilor Lorberbaum moved adoption of the agenda.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda as
amended.
Councilor Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No one from the public wished to be heard.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Levine presented the consent agenda and explained the procedure for discussion and approval.
Councilor Mazzitello moved approval of the consent agenda as presented, pulling items F and M.
6.b
Page 11 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 8
a. Approve 2025 Tobacco License Renewals
b. Approve Appointment of Student Representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission
c. Authorize Posting for Mendota Heights Police Cadet
d. Resolution 2024-64 Supporting the Dakota County 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan
e. Approve Geotechnical Evaluation Contract for the Hampshire Estates Street Improvements
f. Authorize Execution of MN Historical and Cultural Heritage Program Grant Contract Between the
City of Mendota Heights and the MN Historical Society for the Oheyawahi Interpretive Design
Project
g. Approve Purchase Order for Tree Removals on Sylvandale Road
h. Acknowledge September 2024 Building Activity Report
i. Acknowledge the September Par 3 Financial Report
j. Acknowledge the 2024 Third Quarter Financial Report
k. Approve September 2024 Treasurer’s Report
l. Approval of Claims List
m. Resolution 2024-68 Terminating Legal Services by Grannis & Hauge, P.A. and Approving
Prosecution Services Agreement Between the City of Mendota Heights and Campbell Knutson
n. Resolution 2024-69 Approving a Master Subscriber Agreement for Court Data Services for
Government Agencies
o. Resolution 2024-70 Approving State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreement and Court Data
Services Subscriber Amendment to the City of Mendota Heights on Behalf of its City Attorney
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
F) AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF MN HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE
PROGRAM GRANT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND
THE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE OHEYAWAHI INTERPRETIVE DESIGN
PROJECT
Councilor Lorberbaum asked for staff to provide information on this item.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter stated that this is the third phase in the interpretive program
for this site, which began three years ago. She stated that phases one and two were also completed with
grants from the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS). She stated that MHS has provided a grant of
$60,000 for phase three which requires a $10,000 match from Mendota Heights. She advised that the City
did budget for this within the 2025 budget and provided details on the anticipated timing noting that the
project would be completed along with the capital improvements planned that will be using state bonding
dollars.
Councilor Lorberbaum shared a Native American proverb.
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF MN HISTORICAL AND
CULTURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM GRANT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MENDOTA
Page 12 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 8
HEIGHTS AND THE MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE OHEYAWAHI INTERPRETIVE
DESIGN PROJECT.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
M) RESOLUTION 2024-68 TERMINATING LEGAL SERVICES BY GRANNIS & HAUGE,
P.A. AND APPROVING PROSECUTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Councilor Paper asked for information on this item.
Police Chief Kelly McCarthy stated that the prosecutor the City has been using is changing firms and he
is the only person that does municipal prosecution services at the current firm, so everyone agreed that it
would be best for the City to change firms to maintain the current prosecutor. She stated that this would
be a one-year contract with no change in cost.
Councilor Paper moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024-68 TERMINATING LEGAL SERVICES BY
GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A. AND APPROVING PROSECUTION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND CAMPBELL KNUTSON.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PRESENTATIONS
No items scheduled.
PUBLIC HEARING
No items scheduled.
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) RESOLUTION 2024-62 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Assistant City Engineer Lucas Ritchie explained that the Council was being asked to approve Resolution
2024-62 adopting and confirming the assessment for the Emerson Avenue Street Improvements.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that the Council did hold and close the public hearing on this item at its
last meeting.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2024-62 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Page 13 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 8
Nays: 0
B) RESOLUTION 2024-65 DEFERRING ASSESSMENT FOR 781 EMERSON AVENUE FOR THE
EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek provided a brief background on this item. The Council was being
asked to consider Resolution 2024-65 deferring the street rehabilitation assessment at 781 Emerson
Avenue for the Emerson Avenue Street Improvement project.
Councilor Lorberbaum commented that she thinks this is a great thing and perhaps many residents are not
aware of the possibility of deferment. She asked if it was too late for a senior citizen to come forward and
make this request.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that it is too late as the intent needs to be declared at, or
before, the time of the public hearing. He stated that the public notice mailed to the residents does provide
the options and steps for deferment.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2024-65 DEFERRING THE MAKING OF
ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 781 EMERSON AVENUE (PID 27-37676-01-
010) FOR THE EMERSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
Councilor Miller seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
C) CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 595, REPEALING AND REPLACING
CHAPTER 3: URBAN FOREST PRESERVATION OF TITLE 15: ENVIRONMENTAL
STANDARDS OF CITY CODE; AND AUTHORIZE PUBLICATION OF SUMMARY ORDINANCE
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter provided a brief background on this item. The Council was
being asked to consider approval of Ordinance No. 595, repealing Chapter 3: Urban Forest, Significant
Trees and Tree Replacement and replace with Chapter 3: Urban Forest Preservation to Title 15:
Environmental Standards of City Code, and authorize publication of summary ordinance.
Councilor Lorberbaum referenced the applicability section and stated that portion reads awkwardly to her
and suggested that instead of a minimum of seven trees, it should read seven or more trees.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter provided more specific information on how measuring is
done and whose responsibility it is to measure. She stated that the tree replacement is not feasible on site,
the City may approve an alternative tree replacement measure such as planting on an alternate site.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that from the discussion of the Commission, he believes that the intent
is to deter people from cutting down significant and heritage trees. He asked how the escrow amount is
calculated.
Page 14 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 8
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter commented that they have not yet determined that but are
considering that it be a percentage or the full cost of tree mitigation. She stated that they could also go
with a standard amount.
Councilor Mazzitello asked how the escrow is refunded.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter commented that the escrow is held and once the work is
completed and successful, the escrow is refunded.
Councilor Lorberbaum thanked staff and the Commission for this great work. She suggested another
change under safeguarding trees, the current language is “to treat with accepted guidelines” and suggested
that be replaced with “to treat according to accepted guidelines”.
Mayor Levine provided the scenario that someone removes a lot of trees without a permit, noting that the
City would not have an escrow in that situation and asked how that would be handled. She also asked if
the escrow should be determined before adoption tonight.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter replied that it was her assumption that fees are reviewed
and sometimes changed annually, which would provide additional time to determine that amount.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson commented that the fee schedule is adopted in January.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter stated that the ordinance would become effective about
that same time.
Mayor Levine provided the scenario that a homeowner removes five trees and asked if they could wait a
period of time and remove an additional five trees to skirt the system.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter replied that there is nothing in the ordinance to address
piecemealing. She stated that in the case that a property owner removes over the threshold of trees without
a permit, it would be assumed all of the removed trees were heritage trees and proper mitigation would
need to be provided and the typical code enforcement would be followed. She stated that neighbors tend
to monitor each other and involve the City.
Mayor Levine asked if something could be added to enforcement, requiring people to adhere to the spirit
of the law.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that if someone takes action without a permit, the Code allows the City to
double fine. He stated that a timeframe could be set to address piecemealing.
Councilor Paper commented that the person who is not going to follow the rules will play the long game.
Councilor Miller commented that may be the case but perhaps the timeframe is made 12 months as that
would push the timeframe on the length of a project.
Page 15 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 of 8
Councilor Paper commented that his thought was not for a project specifically but for someone who is
opening their view along the river where someone could remove trees little by little.
Councilor Miller commented that he believes that this is a good starting point, and they could always
review and adjust the policy. The Council agreed with adding the language “within one calendar year”.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that there would be a separate ordinance to address tree removal that
would occur along the Mississippi River.
Mayor Levine commented that this is an impactful ordinance and asked how this would be communicated
to the community. She stated that she liked the examples and would also like an example of what would
happen if someone did not follow the ordinance.
Natural Resources Coordinator Krista Spreiter commented that this will be communicated through the
traditional methods along with targeted mailings and posting at City Hall.
Councilor Mazzitello suggested adding real estate agents to the list of targeted mailings.
Mayor Levine stated that perhaps there could be an educational message taped and available on the City
website to communicate this information.
Councilor Mazzitello stated that the Commission thoroughly debated this topic and believed that the end
product is great.
Mayor Levine acknowledged that this has been the top priority since that Commission was formed and
therefore a lot of thought and work has been put into this.
Councilor Mazzitello noted that while they try to do things right the first time, he would like to keep an
open mind that changes or improvements may come forward in the future once this is implemented.
Councilor Lorberbaum moved to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 595 REPEALING CHAPTER 3: URBAN
FOREST, SIGNIFICANT TREES AND TREE REPLACEMENT AND REPLACE WITH CHAPTER 3:
URBAN FOREST PRESERVATION TO TITLE 15: ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS OF CITY
CODE WITH THE CHANGES AS MENTIONED; AND AUTHORIZE PUBLICATION OF
SUMMARY ORDINANCE.
Councilor Miller seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
D) RESOLUTION 2024-66 APPROVING THE DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADMINISTER CITY LOCAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AID
(LAHA) FUNDS
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided a brief background on this item. The Council
was being asked to approve Resolution 2024-66 supporting collaboration with the Dakota County
Community Development Agency to administer the City Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) funds.
Page 16 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 8
Mayor Levine asked who the grants would be aimed at and how they would apply.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden provided details on the income restrictions for the two
programs and stated that residents would apply through Dakota County for these programs.
Mayor Levine asked if there are targeted mailings sent to advertise these programs.
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden stated that the CDA does the bulk of the marketing for
the programs. She noted that not much marketing is needed as there is often a waitlist for the home
improvement program. She commented that the City can advertise the programs through its typical
channels as well. She commented that the program could be mentioned in cases of code enforcement as
well.
Councilor Lorberbaum encouraged staff to include an article in the Mendota Heights Highlights to
advertise the programs.
Mayor Levine thanked Dakota County CDA for working with the City and offering to administer the
programs, which would have been difficult for the small staff of Mendota Heights.
Councilor Mazzitello referenced the Joint Powers Agreement that will be executed between the two
entities and asked how members of the public would view that document.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson stated that residents could contact City Hall to request that
information if desired.
Councilor Mazzitello commented that program details are available at DakotaCountyCDA.org.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2025-66 APPROVING THE DAKOTA
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADMINISTER CITY LOCAL
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AID FUNDS.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson thanked the City staff and volunteers who provided a sound and
successful election process. She announced upcoming community events and activities.
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence provided additional details on the upcoming toy swap.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilor Paper commented that it is Movember, supporting men’s health, and encouraged men to get
checked.
Page 17 of 89
November 6, 2024 Mendota Heights City Council Page 8 of 8
Councilor Lorberbaum echoed thanks to staff and those who served as election judges. She stated that the
previous weekend she attended a Day of the Dead event at Two Rivers and thanked the sponsors that
helped to make the event a success. She commented that it was a wonderful event.
Councilor Miller provided advice for those who may need solace today.
Councilor Mazzitello echoed the comments made thus far related to the election and expressed thanks to
those who assisted. He stated that over the course of the nation, just shy of 150,000,000 votes were cast
yesterday and to have that number counted so quickly is a testament to everyone who volunteers to
participate in that process. He appreciated the high voter turnout the City has and the wonderful staff as
well. He congratulated those who won and consoled those who did not. He stated that on Monday the
community has the ability to thank those who make it possible for the country to have the voting process.
Mayor Levine echoed and thanked all who participated and assisted with the elections. She stated that
she has enjoyed serving with Councilor Miller, who will leave the Council at the end of this year.
ADJOURN
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adjourn.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 8:20
p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Nancy Bauer
City Clerk
Page 18 of 89
November 12, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Short-Term Rentals Page - 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DRAFT Minutes of the City Council Work Session
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a work session of the Mendota Heights City Council was
held at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 6:15 p.m. Councilors Lorberbaum, Mazzitello,
Miller, and Paper were also present.
Others present included City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek,
Community Development Manager Sarah Madden, City Attorney Amy Schmidt, and City Clerk
Nancy Bauer.
CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE
Mayor Levine introduced the discussion to finalize the proposed ordinance on short-term rentals.
Community Development Manager Madden reported that the residency/homestead requirement
needed to be discussed along with the definition of primary residence. Some redundant sections
were removed after the October 1, 2024, work session discussion.
The condition of the licenses section 3-5A-4 paragraph 9 was updated regarding maintaining a
current guest registry for a minimum of one year instead of five years, which is consistent with the
State statute for hotels.
Discussion of the legality of using a homestead requirement for primary residence was discussed.
City Attorney Schmidt said it was not common to have a homestead requirement in a rental
ordinance and if included in the ordinance that it could stand up in a court of law. It was the
consensus of the Council to keep the homestead requirement in the proposed ordinance.
Councilor Lorberbaum asked if the age of the renter should be added to the registry. Sarah Madden
responded that the registry would only be requested by city staff if staff needed to see it. It was
the consensus to leave it up to staff how to enforce the age of the renter. Community Development
Manager Madden said the ordinance requirements for short-term rentals would be listed on the
license application and one of those requirements would be the age of the renter.
The percentage of houses within a certain area that could be licensed as a short-term rental was
discussed, and it was the consensus to not incorporate it in the proposed ordinance and could be
revisited in the future.
6.c
Page 19 of 89
November 12, 2024, Mendota Heights City Council Work Session Minutes Short-Term Rentals Page - 2
Community Development Manager Madden reported that she believed the $200.00 fee for the
short-term rental license would be reasonable and would be included in the fee schedule. The
Inspectron inspection fee would be $75.00 an hour and the initial inspection should not take long.
Enforcement of the requirements of the proposed ordinance would go through the code
enforcement process. Operating without a license was discussed and charging a double fee if an
operator did not get a license was discussed.
The next step would be to present the draft ordinance December 3, 2024, City Council meeting.
The summary ordinance would then be published to go into effect January 1, 2025, and 45 days
after that licenses could be issued.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilor Mazzitello made a motion to adjourn the meeting, and it was seconded by Councilor
Paper. Motion passed 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 5:39 p.m.
___________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 20 of 89
1
Special City Council Meeting November 12, 2024, Minutes
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the City Council Special Meeting
Held Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Mendota Heights City Council
was held at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Lorberbaum, Mazzitello, Miller, and Paper were also present.
Also, in attendance were City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Public Works Director Ryan
Ruzek, Parks & Recreation Director/Assistant Public Works Director Meredith Lawrence, and
City Clerk Nancy Bauer
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
RESOLUTION 2024-77 CANVASSING OF ELECTION RESULTS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2024,
GENERAL ELECTION
Clerk Bauer read the results of the 2024 General Election for the city offices as:
Mayor Stephanie Levine 6,374 votes
City Council Member John P. Maczko 5,187 votes
City Council Member Joel Paper 5,158 votes
Motion to approve RESOLUTION 2024-77 CANVASSING OF ELECTION RESULTS OF
NOVEMBER 5, 2024, GENERAL ELECTION was made by Council Member Mazzitello,
seconded by Council Member Lorberbaum
Discussion: Mayor Levine congratulated Council Member-elect Maczko and congratulated
Council Member Paper on his reelection. She thanked Council Member Miller for his eight
years of service on the City Council. Council Member Mazzitello congratulated Mayor Levine
on her reelection.
Motion to approve RESOLUTION 2024-77 CANVASSING OF ELECTION RESULTS OF
NOVEMBER 5, 2024, GENERAL ELECTION carried 5-0.
Page 21 of 89
6.d
2
Special City Council Meeting November 12, 2024, Minutes
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Mazzitello, seconded by Council Member Paper to adjourn the
meeting at 6:04 p.m. Motion carried 5-0.
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 22 of 89
6.e
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Approve 2025 Tobacco License Renewal
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve 2025 Tobacco License for Mendakota Country Club
BACKGROUND:
Mendakota County Club has submitted their 2025 license renewal paperwork for a tobacco
license. They have paid their fees, passed a background check, and are ready for Council
approval.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 23 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
6.f
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Massage Therapist License
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve a Massage Therapist License.
BACKGROUND:
Kaya Wint, has applied for a massage therapist license to work at Hush Therapeutic Massage.
She has completed the application requirements and passed the background investigation.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 24 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
6.g
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Purchase Order for Victoria Road Storm Sewer Improvement
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve a purchase order for a storm sewer improvement on Victoria Road.
BACKGROUND:
Victoria Road was reconstructed in 2013 which added curbing and storm sewer. The property
at 1645 Victoria Road is built at a lower elevation than the street. In heavy rain events or when
snow is blocking the curb, water runs down the driveway into the yard creating nuisance icing
and erosion. Staff worked with the homeowner on an acceptable solution to install a storm
sewer drain just upstream of their driveway to capture the water into the city storm pipes.
Staff had concrete structures on hand that were being stored at public works from a previous
project that would fit this improvement. A contractor was hired to install the provided storm
sewers as a time & material installation.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The work for this improvement was not pre-approved by the City Council and exceeded the
purchasing policy requirements for small projects by $950. Staff is asking the Council to
approve an after the fact purchase order for Kirchner Contracting for $10,950 for this drainage
improvement.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 25 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
6.h
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2024-67 Approving Support for a Noise Wall along Victoria Road
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve resolution 2024-67 supporting an application to MnDOT for the construction of a
noise wall along Victoria Road.
BACKGROUND:
MnDOT Metro has a standalone noise barrier program which is a solicitation-based process
requiring cities to submit applications to be considered for noise wall funding. Residents
submitted a petition asking the city to apply for a noise wall. The MnDOT program requires a
local match of 10% for the construction costs and an additional 8% of the local match for
contract costs. The city is also responsible for maintenance on the resident side of the barrier.
The location selected spans partially over two MnDOT study areas that rank 97 and 101. The
MnDOT preliminary study results show these segments meet the cost/benefit analysis. City
Council discussed this item at their October 15, 2024, meeting and directed staff to present a
resolution of support.
Additional directions and information about this program are also available on the MnDOT
website: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/environment/noise/metro.html
Timeline for solicitation:
•September 1, 2024 – Applications accepted
•December 31, 2024 – Applications due
•Jan to April 2025 – MnDOT conducts noise analysis for applications received and ranks
applications based on existing noise levels, length of barrier, number of benefited
homes, and cost-effectiveness of a noise barrier
•Spring 2025 – MnDOT announces selected project(s)
Page 26 of 89
•2025 to 2026 – Project(s) are scoped and programmed into MnDOT’s STIP and City’s
CIP (as needed)
•2026 to 2029 – MnDOT designs project(s) and coordinates with selected city
•FY 2030 – Begin project construction
The updated version of the noise study report is available at: https://edocs-
public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs_public/DMResultSet/download?docId=25639592
Information about ongoing and upcoming selected Standalone Noise Barrier projects is
available at:
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/standalonenoisebarrier/upcoming.html
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Staff would need to confirm funding sources but are hopeful the Municipal State Aid funding
could be a potential source. If that is not an option, the city would need to fund the project
through an alternate source. The city could also consider specially assessing the benefiting
properties for the costs as the improvements would not benefit the city as a whole. The City
Council does not need to determine the funding source at this time.
If the city chooses to apply for the program, MnDOT will perform additional analysis of the
area which may allow for a shorter wall is certain areas. Preliminary estimates based on the
MnDOT application are as follows: Wood barrier - 3,500 ft long x 20 ft height x $60 =
$4,200,000 x 10 percent local match equals $420,000 + $33,600 = $453,600
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2024-67 Noise Barrier
2.2024 MnDOT Metro Standalone Noise Barrier Application
3.MnDOT Metro Standalone Noise Barrier Map
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure, Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 27 of 89
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2024-67
APPROVING A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION – NOISE WALL
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation
(MnDOT) and in accordance with Statute 161.125 – Sound Abatement Along Highways,
proposes to study, design, and construct a noise wall improvement along the west side of
Interstate 35E, between Marie Avenue and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) within the
corporate City of Mendota Heights (City) limits, tentatively scheduled in the year 2030; and
WHEREAS, the City supports the continued study and design of this noise wall
improvement, and have agreed to consider the City’s participation in the costs of the noise wall
construction and associated construction engineering in future City Capital Improvements
programming.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Mendota Heights provide this
resolution of support for the construction of a noise wall along the west side of Interstate 35E,
between Marie Avenue and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) within the corporate City of
Mendota Heights (City) limits.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this nineteenth day of November
2024.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie B Levine, Mayor
ATTEST
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I HERBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to
and adopted by the City of Mendota Heights, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, at a duly
authorized City Council meeting held in the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, on the 19th day
of November, 2024, as disclosed by the records of said City on file and of record in the office.
_________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 28 of 89
Page 29 of 89
Page 30 of 89
2069
1960 2031
1780
1060
995
1044
1080
897
1040
1877
2021
989
10261032
1845
1036
1853
897
1861
1869
1084
1000 1861
999
1853
1811
1839
1789
1869
1845
992
1824
1830
999
1775
1841
1017
1045
988
1092
1813
1805
1005
17911794
1940
1795
1936
1015
1084
1087
1016
1944
1001
1824
1815
998
1853
1002
1823
1090
1780
1837
1807
2049
1101
2041
1806
1017
1861
1821
10371041104710511059
1848
1091
1815
1871
1821
1075
1924
1831
1065
1819
1110
1807
1791
1055
1816
1088
1825
1923
1793
1817
1882
1854
1794
1831
1823
1096
1001
1829
1827
2048
1085
1074
1095
1085
1079
1085
1827
1082
1040
1857
1080
1067
1867
1086
2036
1792
1854
1899
1915
1883
1818
1881
2050
1839
1842
1840
1926
1838
1889
1830
1847
1092
1872
1832
1814
1085 1083
1815
1089
1822
1860
1832
1927
1058
1856
1848
1818
1075
1939
1081
1840
1859
1880
1824
1858
1093
10461052
1029
1855
1864
1848
1846
1856
1845
1818
1812
1004
1839
1834
1862
2049
1870
1875
1087
1066
1806
1842
1831
1090
1920
1781
1822
1837
1795
1778
1836
1091
1779
1933
1783
1081
1091
1044
2044 2047
1038
20532054
1081
2058
1094 10501054 1004
1101
2056
1985
1088
934
1813
910
1060 1010
950
1941
902
1780
906 882894
1977
1981
926
2059
942
1101
890
946 938
1877
1813
896
886
2061
894
1861
1901
1861
1895
1120
1895
1901
1795
1835
898
1833
892
1875
924
1833
1916
1859
930
1805
1777
1806
1833
1833
18331833
1833
1804
1794
1814
1800
1789
1833
878
1810
1802
1877
1120
1870
1808
1915
999
1837
1857
1948
1845
1847
1805
1841
1843
1805
1805 1805
20612060
1810
1805
1805
1000
2069
1805
1805
1870
1805
1869
1805
1805
1812
1869
1805
1853
1851
1855
1849
1869
1869
1869
1870
1870
1869
1869
890
1870
1805
1805
1869
1869
1869
1869
1869
1869
1979 986
1934
1890
1910
1918
1960
1858
1877
1787
1854
1775
1875
1094
1850
1836
1805 1805
998
1821
874920
1842 1830
888
1848
1018
MARIE AVE
HIGHWAY 62 VICTORIA RD SWALSH LNLEXINGTON AVEINTERSTATE 35ESUMMIT LNAVANTI DR
DAKOTA DR
HIGHWAY 62 WB RAMPTWIN CIRCLE DREAGLE R
I
D
G
E
D
R
VAIL DR FARO LNHIGHVIEW CIR S
LILAC LNMARY ADELE AVE
CARMEN LN
HIGHWAY 62 EB RAMP
IN
T
E
R
S
TA
T
E
3
5
E
SB
RAM
P ROLLING GREEN CURVTIMMY STOXFORD C
TOVERLOOK LNBWANA CT
WILLIAM CTWEST CIRCLE CT
THERESA STCROWN POI
N
T
D
R
PATRICIA STWIND
W
O
O
D
C
T HIGHVIEW CIR NORCHARD HL
ORCHARD PL
VICTORIA CURV
INTERSTATE 35EHIGHWAY 62
Nearmap U S Inc
I-35E Noise Wall
Date: 10/24/2024
City ofMendotaHeights0510
SCALE IN FEET
GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights.
Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation.
Legend
Homes 1997-Present
Homes Pre-1997
Potential Noise Wall
Page 31 of 89
6.i
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2024-72 Certifying Delinquent Sewer Accounts
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2024-72 Certifying Delinquent Sewer Utility Charges to the Dakota County
Auditor for the Collection with Real Estate Taxes
BACKGROUND:
There are currently 62 delinquent sewer accounts totaling $38,855.84 to be certified to Dakota
County for collection with property taxes per City Code 10-3-7. In 2023, the city certified
$47,347.36 of delinquent sewer charges to Dakota County for collection with property taxes.
Per City Code and City Ordinance, included in these amounts are all balances, interest and late
charges. The total amount of said utility charges shall be paid with general property taxes for
the year 2024 and collectible in 2025. Per City Code and City Ordinance, letters were sent to
property owners of sewer accounts past due in excess of two quarters, notifying them that if
the delinquency was not paid by November 12, 2024, the amount due, plus seven percent
(7%) interest and a $50.00 charge will be certified to Dakota County for collection with
property taxes.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2024-72 Certifying delinquent sewer
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 32 of 89
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2024-72
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SEWER UTILITY CHARGES TO THE
DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITORS FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of City Code 10-3-7 adopted by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights on February 18, 2003, it is provided that if sewer rental charges due to the
City for the use of the City’s sewer system are not paid within thirty (30) days after the mailing
of a billing statement thereof, the same shall be collected and the collection thereof enforced in
the same manner and in all respects as county and state real estate taxes, subject to like penalty,
cost and interest charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that the total sewer rental charges due
to the City as of October 11, 2024, has been sent to the last known owner of said properties and
that more than thirty (30) days has elapsed since the mailing of said statement; and
WHEREAS, said properties are all situated in the City of Mendota Heights, County of Dakota,
Minnesota, and the parcel identification number of said properties, and the total amount of
sewer rental charges due for each said parcel through November 12, 2024, are more particularly
described as follows:
PARCEL ID NUMBER AMOUNT DUE
277640202030 $139.30
273760104030 $113.92
277127502260 $291.68
276970301020 $593.10
274210007070 $463.86
273130003041 $476.22
271981001100 $734.10
272490301010 $701.76
274210008171 $767.80
270380013020 $868.54
276970301070 $372.38
276970104024 $488.08
270420000170 $614.52
277640203070 $814.42
Page 33 of 89
274210001040 $1093.50
271715104010 $430.52
278130000062 $129.56
273860003050 $540.58
273860004070 $527.10
273860004100 $410.36
275750003080 $406.22
275750003120 $707.10
271710001160 $943.70
271710001210 $834.70
273250002050 $615.02
277115013040 $892.26
272920002010 $807.40
277640100050 $904.72
274920001021 $823.96
278330000181 $858.40
274190001210 $544.20
274210005040 $908.04
273767502020 $651.82
277640100200 $697.00
273760006160 $524.24
276470002050 $674.38
274120001070 $355.70
276970303120 $499.98
274495502050 $695.82
271715005060 $595.96
273760002010 $1118.54
272780013030 $524.26
272780019050 $607.94
271985005070 $380.84
272780004170 $437.28
272780005090 $603.22
272780005100 $373.66
271515002030 $932.82
276460002120 $555.22
Page 34 of 89
270360025020 $706.16
272780018060 $985.98
272840004110 $552.38
274478002070 $328.38
274822503080 $589.68
271985003150 $397.04
272780010250 $523.68
274160101090 $753.40
271915000070 $615.68
271830206110 $856.14
270410036011 $129.54
277128605001 $1696.72
270400025010 $675.36
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the total of said utility charges set forth above is hereby adopted and confirmed as
the proper unpaid utility charges due for the above-described properties through
November 12, 2024, for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land shall be a lien
concurrent with the general taxes upon such parcels and all thereof.
2. That the total amount of said utility charges shall be payable with general taxes for the
year 2024 collectable in 2025.
3. That the Utility Billing Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the Dakota County Auditor a
certified copy of this Resolution with the request that each of said amounts shall be
extended upon the property tax lists of Dakota County to be thereafter collected in the
manner provided by law.
4. That a $50.00 service charge and seven percent (7%) interest has been added to each
delinquent utility account in accordance with City Code 10-3-7. B.2.
Page 35 of 89
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 19th day of November, 2024.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
___________________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST
__________________________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 36 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
6.j
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution 2024-73 Certifying Delinquent Water Accounts
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Finance CONTACT: Kristen Schabacker, Finance
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Approve Resolution 2024-73 Certifying Delinquent Water Charges to the Dakota County
Auditor for Collection with Real Estate Taxes
BACKGROUND:
City Code 10-5-5, authorizes the City to certify to Dakota County for collection with property
taxes any unpaid costs for water charges that are past due to the Board of Water
Commissioners of the City of St. Paul. There are 72 water accounts with the Board of Water
Commissioners of the City of St. Paul totaling $29,077.04 to be certified this year. In 2023, the
city certified approximately $30,233.58 of delinquent water charges to Dakota County for
collection with property taxes.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Resolution 2024-73 for certifying delinquent water
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 37 of 89
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2024-73
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT WATER CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA
COUNTY AUDITORS FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of City Code 10-5-5 adopted by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights on April 19, 2016, it is provided that if water charges are past due to the
Board of Water Commissioners of the City of St. Paul and are not paid within thirty (30) days
after the mailing of a billing statement thereof, the same shall be collected and the collection
thereof enforced in the same manner and in all respects as county and state real estate taxes,
subject to like penalty, cost and interest charges; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that the total water charges due to the
Board of Water Commissioners of the City of St. Paul as of the middle of October, 2024 has been
sent to the last known owner of said properties and that more than thirty (30) days has elapsed
since the mailing of said statement; and
WHEREAS, said properties are all situated in the City of Mendota Heights, County of Dakota,
Minnesota, and the parcel identification number of said properties, and the total amount of
water charges due for each said parcel through November 5, 2024 are more particularly
described as follows:
PARCEL ID NUMBER AMOUNT DUE
270230050021 $178.92
270410036011 $286.72
270420000170 $352.30
271150001130 $124.04
271515002030 $685.90
271710001160 $145.68
271715005060 $98.88
271715104010 $105.60
271785000110 $68.42
271820000040 $84.92
271830006040 $181.06
271830101060 $139.74
271830201070 $131.46
271985004030 $397.50
Page 38 of 89
272245002250 $134.42
272250001070 $210.34
272336503030 $587.98
272780003060 $266.72
272780004170 $276.70
272780007060 $587.36
272780009130 $527.58
272780011060 $81.24
272780013030 $282.32
272780018060 $759.72
272780019050 $563.32
272780019180 $405.66
272840004110 $702.98
272920002010 $334.98
273130002130 $97.12
273130003041 $433.66
273760002010 $1249.68
273760104030 $192.30
273765005030 $1541.04
273767502020 $139.50
273860004021 $1632.74
273860004100 $131.10
274160101090 $1112.30
274210001040 $523.12
274210002040 $144.58
274210005040 $1065.16
274210008171 $661.96
274440000030 $341.58
274495502050 $434.46
274530000230 $216.98
274530000310 $109.04
274750000063 $228.28
274822502010 $129.34
274822503080 $973.74
274840101080 $218.94
Page 39 of 89
274846001080 $562.32
274860001060 $156.16
274920001021 $210.56
274920003070 $431.60
275420001071 $129.34
275750003080 $251.04
275750003120 $501.92
276400001070 $161.56
276400002030 $407.86
276450000160 $83.64
276470002050 $829.82
276470005010 $194.78
276475001012 $1973.98
276970205041 $124.26
276970301020 $413.10
276970301070 $180.96
277110001050 $548.14
277115009030 $144.58
277115016010 $87.96
277127502090 $133.72
277640100241 $907.34
277640203190 $142.36
278330000181 $220.96
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the total of said water charges set forth above is hereby adopted and confirmed as
the proper unpaid utility charges due for the above-described properties through the
middle of October, 2024 for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land shall be a lien
concurrent with the general taxes upon such parcels and all thereof.
2. That the total amount of said water charges shall be payable with general taxes for the
year 2024 collectable in 2025.
3. That the Utility Billing Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the Dakota County Auditor a
certified copy of this Resolution with the request that each of said amounts shall be
extended upon the property tax lists of Dakota County to be thereafter collected in the
manner provided by law.
Page 40 of 89
Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 19th day of November, 2024.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
____________________________________________
Stephanie B. Levine, Mayor
ATTEST
_____________________________________________
Nancy Bauer, City Clerk
Page 41 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
6.k
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledge September 2024 Fire Synopsis
ITEM TYPE: Consent Item
DEPARTMENT: Fire CONTACT: Sheila Robertson,
Administrative
Coordinator/Deputy City
Clerk
ACTION REQUEST:
Acknowledge September 2024 Fire Synopsis.
BACKGROUND:
Information is included in the attachments.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.09 Sept 2024
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government
Page 42 of 89
September 2024 Fire Synopsis
Fire Calls: 24
For September 2024, the Fire Department paged for service a total of 24 times.
Mendota Heights 21 calls Lilydale 0 calls Mendota 1 call Sunfish Lake 1 call Other 1 call ---------------------------------- Total 24 calls
Types of calls:
Excessive Heat/Scorch Burns: 1- In September the fire department responded to smoke in a restaurant. Upon
arrival it was discovered that a heating wire in the door frame to the walk-in cooler had broken and was
shorting in liquid on the floor. The hazard was disabled, and the restaurant crew was advised to get
maintenance on scene to restore power to the cooler.
Medical/Extrication: 10- In September the fire department responded to nine calls that were medical in
nature, and one elevator rescue call.
Hazardous Situations: 2- The MHFD responded to a cut gas line, as well as to what was called a CO alarm, but
in fact was an activated water sensor.
Service Calls: 1- The department responded to one unauthorized burning complaint.
False Alarms/System Malfunctions: 3- Our team responded to one unintentional fire alarm trip and two
alarms due to system malfunctions.
Good Intent: 4- For the month of September, firefighters responded to one call for a possible hazmat release
(where none was detected), two good intent calls, and one in which a homeowner believed they detected an
electrical burning smell but after investigation, no problem was found.
Dispatched and Cancelled En route: 2- Two calls were cancelled before our units arrived on scene.
Mutual/Auto-Aid Other: 1 There was one auto aid call to West St Paul that was later deemed to be due to
burnt food.
Page 43 of 89
September Trainings
Monday, September 9, 18:30 Mandatory Skills #2 Ladders/Search Option 2
This drill was a test-out opportunity for our firefighters testing their skills in two areas: 1: Their ability to utilize,
deploy and properly climb our ground ladders as well as to deploy and use the aerial truck mounted ladder. 2:
Their ability to search for, locate, and remove a victim from an area when their vision is completely obstructed
throughout, as is the vision of the other search team members in their group.
Thursday, September 12, 07:00
Mandatory Skills #2 Ladders/Search Option 3
This drill was a test-out opportunity for our firefighters testing their skills in two areas: 1: Their ability to utilize,
deploy and properly climb our ground ladders as well as to deploy and use the aerial truck mounted ladder. 2:
Their ability to search for, locate, and remove a victim from an area when their vision is completely obstructed
throughout, as is the vision of the other search team members in their group.
Saturday, September 21, 08:00 Skills Drill Opportunity Elective
This drill was an opportunity to practice and perfect the skills that the department requires each firefighter to pass.
Monday, September 24, 07:00 Mandatory Fire Ground Scenario Option #1
This drill was held at an outside facility where department firefighters and apparatus were deployed in the same way they would be in a real fire scenario. Upon arrival, firefighters and officers were required to assess the situation (via photos) and properly give a size up, assume command, and have trucks properly deploy proper personnel and equipment in a real time scenario-based environment.
Tuesday, September 25, 18:30
Mandatory Fire Ground Scenario Option #2
This drill was held at an outside facility where department firefighters and apparatus were deployed in the
same way they would be in a real fire scenario. Upon arrival, firefighters and officers were required to assess
the situation (via photos) and properly give a size up, assume command, and have trucks properly deploy
proper personnel and equipment in a real time scenario-based environment.
Page 44 of 89
Number of Calls 24 Total Calls for Year 298
FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED:NUMBER STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC.TOTALS TO DATE
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - MH Commercial $0
Structure - MH Residential $3,500
Structure - Contract Areas $0
Cooking Fire - confined $5,000
Vehicle - MH $46,124
Vehicle - Contract Areas $0
Grass/Brush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES
Other Fire 1,000.00$
OVERPRESSURE RUPTURE $0 $0
Excessive heat, scorch burns 1
MEDICAL
Emergency Medical/Assist 5
Vehicle accident w/injuries
Extrication 1 ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH)1,000.00$
Medical, other 4
HAZARDOUS SITUATION $8,500
Spills/Leaks 1
Carbon Monoxide Incident 1 $46,124
Power line down
Arcing, shorting $54,624
Hazardous, Other
SERVICE CALL
Smoke or odor removal $1,000
Assist Police or other agency
Service Call, other 1
GOOD INTENT
Good Intent
Dispatched & Cancelled 3 Current To Date Last Year
Smoke Scare 1 21 221 225
HazMat release investigation 1 0 19 19
Good Intent, Other 2 1 10 6
FALSE ALARMS 1 18 23
False Alarm 1 30 24
Malfunction 2
Unintentional 1 Total:24 298 297
False Alarm, other
MUTUAL AID FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH
Total Calls 24 Inspections
Investigations
WORK PERFORMED Hours To Date Last Year
Re-Inspection
Fire Calls 310 3570 3698
Meetings 16.5 552.75 388 Meetings
Training 297 3263 2842.5
Special Activity 33.5 456.5 726.5 Administration
Fire Marshal 0 0 0
Plan Review/Training
TOTALS 657 7842.25 7655 TOTAL:0
Misc. Grass Contract -
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 2024 MONTHLY REPORT
FIRE LOSS TOTALS
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS
Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights Only Structure/Contents
Mendota Heights Only Miscellaneous
Mendota Heights Total Loss to Date
Contract Areas Loss to Date
Lilydale
Mendota
Sunfish Lake
Mutual Aid
Page 45 of 89
Page 46 of 896.l
Page 47 of 89
Page 48 of 89
Page 49 of 89
Page 50 of 89
Page 51 of 89
Page 52 of 89
Page 53 of 89
Page 54 of 89
Page 55 of 89
Page 56 of 89
Page 57 of 89
Page 58 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
7.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Metro Transit Network Now Concept Plan
ITEM TYPE: Presentation
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Informational. Staff from Metro Transit will present information on the Network Now (draft)
concept plan.
BACKGROUND:
Network Now is Metro Transit’s vision for bus and rail service investments through 2027. The
plan guides improvements to grow ridership, enhance mobility, and meet the travel needs of
our region now.
The full draft Network Now Plan is available at www.metrotransit.org/network-now
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Network Now Executive Summary
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Economic Vitality & Community Vibrancy, Inclusive and Responsive Government, Premier
Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 59 of 89
NetworkNOW | Concept Plan Report | September 2024 1
What is Network Now?
Network Now is Metro Transit’s vision for bus and rail service investments through 2027. This plan guides
improvements to grow ridership, enhance mobility, and meet the travel needs of our region now.
After reviewing customer and community feedback, analyzing network performance since 2019, and reviewing
policy guidance we created the Establishing the Foundation report, which includes a set of principles to shape
decision making.
Network Now Principles
Adapt Adapt service to changes in transit markets and travel patterns.
Prepare Prepare for new METRO and high-frequency routes.
Maintain Maintain the reliability of our scheduled service consistently over time.
Build on success Build on success to grow ridership adding service where people use transit
the most.
Provide access Provide access to opportunities and services with a focus on advancing equity
and reducing regional disparities.
The Concept Plan
The Network Now concept plan proposes service improvements that reflect customer priorities. This concept
plan includes support for new METRO light rail and bus rapid transit (BRT) lines, enhances local services, and
invests in new ways of traveling such as microtransit and frequent, all-day, express corridors. The plan also
resolves the status of bus routes and facilities suspended since 2020 and reinvests those resources to best meet
travel patterns today.
METRO Network Local Bus Express Bus Metro Micro
Green Line Extension
light rail
4 new BRT lines by
2027
Improved frequency
Expanded geographic
coverage
New Key Express
Network provides
frequent trips in major
travel corridors
Maintains most
express routes
currently operating
New coverage in
suburban areas
8 new zones by 2027
SEPTEMBER 2024
NetworkNOW Concept PlanExecutive Summary
Page 60 of 89
NetworkNOW | Concept Plan Report | September 2024 2
Outcomes
The Network Now concept plan achieves the following improvements:
The Network Now concept plan is now available for public comment. To view the full plan and learn how to
provide feedback, visit metrotransit.org/network-now. For more information, subscribe to project updates or
contact Metro Transit staff at NetworkNow@metrotransit.org.
Expands transit
service by more than
35%
Increases access to jobs
by nearly 25%
compared to
pre-pandemic service.
Improves
frequency on60+
bus routes.
Reinvests
commuter and
express service
to meet today’s
travel patterns.
Reduces carbon
emissions by
enabling more
people to
choose transit.
Restores light
rail to service
every 10 minutes.
Improves service
equity for low-
income residents
and communities
of color.
Builds on
workforce
hiring in
real time.
Improves
access by
expanding
micro zones.
Page 61 of 89
This page is intentionally left blank
9.a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Accept the Retirement of Fire Chief Dave Dreelan and Appoint Dan Johnson
as Fire Chief
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Administration CONTACT: Cheryl Jacobson, City
Administrator
ACTION REQUEST:
Accept the retirement notice of Fire Chief Dave Dreelan and Appoint Dan Johnson as Fire Chief
for the City of Mendota Heights.
BACKGROUND:
Fire Chief Dave Dreelan has announced his retirement from the Mendota Heights Fire
Department effective January 17, 2025. Chief Dreelan has been with the department since
1990 and has been Fire Chief since 2017. Chief Dreelan has been a vital part of the City of
Mendota Heights, and we are incredibly grateful for his leadership, commitment, and
unwavering dedication to the community.
With Dreelan's retirement, the position of Fire Chief was posted within the department and the
recruitment process was conducted.
I am pleased to recommend the appointment of Dan Johnson as the city's next Fire Chief. Dan
has been a member of the department since 2015 and has held a number of positions with the
department, including assistant training officer and squad captain. In addition to his firefighter
responsibilities, he currently serves as the department's training officer. To allow for the
transition of responsibilities, Dan and Dave will co-hold the position of Fire Chief. Dan's official
appointment as Fire Chief will be effective January 17, 2025. His badge pinning will take place
at the January 21, 2025 city council meeting.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
The position of Fire Chief is included in the annual budget.
Page 62 of 89
ATTACHMENTS:
None
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 63 of 89
9.b
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
AGENDA ITEM: Pavement Rehabilitation Approach for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood
Improvements
ITEM TYPE: New and Unfinished Business
DEPARTMENT: Engineering CONTACT: Lucas Ritchie, Asssitant City
Engineer
Ryan Ruzek, Public Works
Director
ACTION REQUEST:
Provide staff with direction on the pavement rehabilitation approach within the Friendly Hills
Neighborhood Improvements project
BACKGROUND:
The preparation of a feasibility report for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements,
which is required to follow the Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 process, was authorized by the
Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2024-28 at the City Council meeting
held on June 4, 2024. The Statute 429 process is required because the city intends to assess a
portion of the project.
The feasibility report for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements was accepted by the
Mendota Heights City Council and called for a Public Hearing on September 17, 2024, by
adopting Resolution 2024-45 at the August 7, 2024, City Council meeting. The
recommendation of the feasibility report was to proceed with this project.
The proposed streets to be rehabilitated are Apache Court, Apache Lane, Apache Street, Aztec
Lane, Cheyenne Lane, Creek Avenue, Decorah Lane, Fox Place, Havenview Court, Hazel Court,
Hokah Avenue, Keokuk Lane, Mohican Court, Mohican Lane, Nashua Lane, Navajo Lane, Ocala
Court, Ocala Lane, Pagel Road, Pontiac Place, Pueblo Drive, and Pueblo Lane. Streets proposed
to be rehabilitated are broken out into multiple constructions seasons with roadways
identified north of, and including, Decorah Lane being proposed for rehabilitation in the 2025
construction season and roadways identified south of Decorah Lane being proposed for
Page 64 of 89
rehabilitation in the 2026 construction season. Based on our observations, as well as our
pavement management system, the condition of these streets has deteriorated to a point
where it is no longer cost effective to patch the street and are to a point where rehabilitation is
necessary.
During the public hearing, there was discussion between the residents and council as to the
appropriate pavement rehabilitation approach; specifically, as to whether the roadways should
receive a Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) or a Mill & Overlay (M&O) due to the proposed
watermain replacement and existing material type in areas where watermain is not planned for
replacement by Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Existing watermain within the
project limits consists of both cast iron watermain and ductile iron watermain. SPRWS staff
have indicated that the life expectancy of cast iron watermain has a typical life expectancy of
100 years and can be extended an additional 30 years, typically, with the addition of a
sacrificial anode bag placement at strategic locations along the main. The cast iron watermain
within the project area was constructed in the early 1980’s. Preliminary discussions around the
pavement rehabilitation approach during the public hearing were largely orchestrated around
the pavement rehabilitation approach with consideration for future watermain improvements.
However, based on the year of installation with the existing cast iron watermain and additional
improvements included with the Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements, there is no
guarantee that SPRWS would see the benefit or need to replace to existing watermain that is
being left in place at the time of the next rehabilitation project, regardless of the pavement
rehabilitation approach at this time or with a future rehabilitation project.
Staff had additional geotechnical evaluations performed by Braun Intertec throughout the
project area to provide a recommendation toward the pavement rehabilitation approach.
Braun’s recommendation includes support for a M&O along certain roadways within the
project area not receiving utility improvements, as identified within the attached geotechnical
report and project maps, and note that the expected life expectancy for these roadways is 12-
15 years. This would require an additional pavement rehabilitation project, likely an additional
M&O, at that time. It is anticipated that the streets proposed for an FDR would receive an
additional pavement rehabilitation in the 25 year range, likely a M&O, to prolong the
pavement to the next FDR cycle in the 50 year range.
Providing a mixed pavement rehabilitation approach to the neighborhood would result in
inconsistent pavement needs within the neighborhood over time, as well as inconsistent
assessment amounts to residents within the same neighborhood receiving the same roadway
benefit.
FISCAL AND RESOURCE IMPACT:
Street improvement projects are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.
Pursuant to the City’s Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, the benefiting
properties should be assessed 50% of the street reconstruction and rehabilitation costs. The
following tables show the estimated unit assessments based on the City policy. The following
tables are further broken out based on the alternative pavement rehabilitation approaches, as
Page 65 of 89
well as the applicable assessment amount. Including multiple pavement rehabilitation
approaches within the same neighborhood would be inconsistent with the city’s historical
practices and staff are seeking direction as to how the assessment would be split, if at all,
among the residents.
The following tables include total cost estimates for an FDR approach throughout the entire
project area and include an equal assessment amount for all residents within the project area:
Project Total Total Estimated
Costs (2025 and
2026)
Street Improvements $
4,251,095.50
10% Contingency $
425,109.55
Indirect Costs for Street
Improvements (20%)*
$
935,241.01
Total Costs for Street
Improvements
$
5,611,446.06
Park Improvements $
142,000.00
10% Contingency $
14,200.00
Indirect Costs Park
Improvements (20%)*
$
31,240.00
Total Costs for Park
Improvements
$
187,440.00
Storm Sewer Improvements $
638,275.00
Water Improvements $
15,500.00
Sanitary Improvements $
985,328.00
10% Contingency (All Utility
Improvements)
$
163,910.30
Total Cost for Utility
Improvements
$
1,803,013.30
Saint Paul Regional Water $
Page 66 of 89
Service Watermain
Replacement
1,399,640.00
10% Contingency $
139,964.00
Indirect Costs for SPRWS
(15%)*
$
230,940.61
Total Cost for SPRWS
Improvements
$
1,770,544.61
Total Improvement Cost $
7,431,838.50
Total Contingency Cost $
743,183.85
Total Indirect Costs* $
1,197,421.62
Total Cost $
9,372,443.97
Rounded Total Cost $
9,372,445.00
Funding Source Project Total
Municipal Levy $
2,505,723.03
City Assessment (Municipal Levy) $
169,112.07
Park Fund (Municipal Levy) $
187,440.00
Total Municipal Levy $
2,862,275.10
Municipal State Aid Funds $
300,000.00
Residential Assessments (50%) $
2,636,610.96
Utility Fund - Storm Sewer $
702,102.50
Utility Fund - Sanitary $
Page 67 of 89
1,083,860.80
Utility Fund - Water $
17,050.00
Saint Paul Regional Water Services $
1,770,544.61
Total $
9,372,443.97
Assessment Calculation Total
Total Project Cost $
9,372,443.97
Assessable Amount $
5,611,446.06
Assessment Amount (50% of Assessable Amount) $
2,805,723.03
Total Units - Residential* 343
Assessment - Residential $
2,636,610.96
Total Units - City of Mendota Heights* 22
City Assigned Assessment Amount $
169,112.07
Total Units 365
Unit Assessment (Assessable amount/ XX Units) $
7,686.91
Total Assessment Amount $
7,686.91
*1 unit = 100 frontage feet
The following tables include total cost estimates for a M&O approach throughout the entire
project area and includes a table identifying an equal assessment amount for all residents
within the project area under the assumption that all residents within the neighborhood utilize
the roadways equally and receive the same benefit, as well as a table identifying split
assessment amounts for all residents within the project area based on the pavement
rehabilitation approach in which the driveway access stems from:
Project Total Total Estimated
Page 68 of 89
Costs (2025 and
2026)
Street Improvements $
3,422,484.50
10% Contingency $
342,248.45
Indirect Costs for Street
Improvements (20%)*
$
752,946.59
Total Costs for Street
Improvements
$
4,517,679.54
Park Improvements $
142,000.00
10% Contingency $
14,200.00
Indirect Costs Park
Improvements (20%)*
$
31,240.00
Total Costs for Park
Improvements
$
187,440.00
Storm Sewer Improvements $
638,275.00
Water Improvements $
15,500.00
Sanitary Improvements $
985,328.00
10% Contingency (All Utility
Improvements)
$
163,910.30
Total Cost for Utility
Improvements
$
1,803,013.30
Saint Paul Regional Water
Service Watermain
Replacement
$
1,399,640.00
10% Contingency $
139,964.00
Indirect Costs for SPRWS
(15%)*
$
230,940.61
Page 69 of 89
Total Cost for SPRWS
Improvements
$
1,770,544.61
Total Improvement Cost $
6,603,227.50
Total Contingency Cost $
660,322.75
Total Indirect Costs* $
1,015,127.20
Total Cost $
8,278,677.45
Rounded Total Cost $
8,278,679.00
Funding Source – Mill &
Overylay w/ Equal Assessment
Amounts
Project Total
Municipal Levy $
1,958,839.77
City Assessment (Municipal Levy) $
136,149.25
Park Fund (Municipal Levy) $
187,440.00
Total Municipal Levy $
2,282,429.02
Municipal State Aid Funds $
300,000.00
Residential Assessments (50%) $
2,122,690.52
Utility Fund - Storm Sewer $
702,102.50
Utility Fund - Sanitary $
1,083,860.80
Utility Fund - Water $
17,050.00
Saint Paul Regional Water Services $
1,770,544.61
Page 70 of 89
Total $
8,278,677.45
Assessment Calculation – Mill & Overlay w/ Equal
Assessment Amounts
Total
Total Project Cost $
8,278,677.45
Assessable Amount $
4,517,679.54
Assessment Amount (50% of Assessable Amount) $
2,258,839.77
Total Units - Residential* 343
Assessment - Residential $
2,122,690.52
Total Units - City of Mendota Heights* 22
City Assigned Assessment Amount $
136,149.25
Total Units 365
Unit Assessment (Assessable amount/ XX Units) $
6,188.60
Total Assessment Amount $
6,188.60
*1 unit = 100 frontage feet
Funding Source – Mill &
Overylay w/ Split Assessment
Amounts
Project Total
Municipal Levy $
1,958,839.77
City Assessment (Municipal Levy) $
82,616.57
Park Fund (Municipal Levy) $
187,440.00
Total Municipal Levy $
2,228,896.34
Page 71 of 89
Municipal State Aid Funds $
300,000.00
Residential Assessments (50%) $
2,176,223.20
Utility Fund - Storm Sewer $
702,102.50
Utility Fund - Sanitary $
1,083,860.80
Utility Fund - Water $
17,050.00
Saint Paul Regional Water Services $
1,770,544.61
Total $
8,278,677.45
Assessment Calculation - Split Total
Total Project Cost $
8,278,677.45
FDR Assessable Amount $
3,745,987.08
M&O Assessable Amount $
771,692.46
FDR Assessment Amount (50% of Assessable Amount) $
1,872,993.54
M&O Assessment Amount (50% of Assessable
Amount)
$
385,846.23
FDR Total Units - Residential* 249
M&O Total Units - Residential* 94
Assessment - Residential $
2,176,223.20
FDR Total Units - City of Mendota Heights* 2
M&O Total Units - City of Mendota Heights* 20
City Assigned Assessment Amount $
82,616.57
Page 72 of 89
Total Units 365
FDR Unit Assessment (Assessable amount/ XX Units) $
7,462.13
M&O Unit Assessment (Assessable amount/ XX Units) $
3,384.62
FDR Total Assessment Amount $
7,462.13
M&O Total Assessment Amount $
3,384.62
*1 unit = 100 frontage feet
The tables above identify a varying total Municipal Levy and total project cost based on the
pavement rehabilitation approach and assessment split determination.
It is presumed that the City would secure bonding for the Municipal Levy and Assessment
portions of the project. The assessment amount also varies and is equivalent to 48.0% to
49.4% of the bond amount depending on the pavement rehabilitation approach and
assessment split determination. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 Special Assessment Bond
Issue requires that a minimum of 20% of the total bond issue amount be recovered through
special assessments. The Assessment Hearing for the project is proposed to take place
following construction of the overall project in 2026 and anticipated for the October
timeframe for all parcels includes, regardless of construction in 2025 or 2026.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Revised Geotechnical Evaluation Excerpt
2.Total Project Cost Alternatives
3.Pavement Rehabilitation Approach Exihibits
4.Existing Watermain Type Exihibit
CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY:
Inclusive and Responsive Government, Premier Public Services & Infrastructure
Page 73 of 89
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
AA/EOE
November 1, 2024 Project B2402483.00
Luke Moren, PE
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
14800 Galaxie Avenue, Suite 200
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Re: Addendum 1 to the Revised Geotechnical Evaluation
Friendly Hills Neighborhood – Cores and GPR
Multiple Streets
Mendota Heights, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Moren:
This letter serves as Addendum 1 to our Revised Geotechnical Evaluation Report for this project, dated
July 29, 2024. This Addendum addresses updates for pavement rehabilitation for the Friendly Hills
Neighborhood streets based off the pavement cores and ground penetrating radar (GPR) collected for
the project.
We performed our work in general accordance with our revised proposal for an Addendum to the
Revised Geotechnical Evaluation (QTB203836), dated September 25, 2024.
Background
Braun Intertec completed a Revised Geotechnical Evaluation Report for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
(KHA), titled Friendly Hills Neighborhood Improvements, under Braun Intertec project number B2402483.
The geotechnical recommendations from that report provided recommendations for the design and
construction of pavement rehabilitation and spot utilities (pipe bursting) on several streets in the
Friendly Hills Neighborhood.
New Information
Based on email correspondence with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., we understand the City of
Mendota Heights was looking for additional pavement data to provide updated pavement
recommendations for street rehabilitation within the Friendly Hills Neighborhood. We understand the
City is interested in determining the feasibility of a mill and overlay approach on some or all of the
streets.
Page 74 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 2
Our scope of services for this Addendum included the performance of GPR and performance of
seventeen (17) pavement cores and hand auger borings through the existing pavement section, with the
provision of supplemental geotechnical recommendations.
Results
Ground Penetrating Radar Results
GPR was used to approximate pavement layer thicknesses along the various residential road sections for
the Friendly Hills Neighborhood project. The data was collected at a nominal 1-foot interval. Where
“ground truth” data (cores and hand augers) were performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan
were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the cores/hand augers, to validate the
accuracy of the GPR analysis.
Based on our analysis using the RADAN 7.0 software program, Table 1 shows summary statistics of the
bituminous pavement layer thicknesses, while the Appendix presents the entire results in graphical
format. We can provide complete results electronically at your request. Areas where larger variation in
measured bituminous thickness can be attributed to potential interference or previous work done on the
roadway being observed in the scans.
A second layer (probable aggregate base) was not visible in some of the scans (i.e. it was difficult to
identify/discern as a distinct layer due to ambient interference with the GPR signal). A lack of a visible
second layer in the GPR scan does not imply an absence of one within the pavement section. Refer to our
pavement core and hand auger boring results for pavement and approximate apparent aggregate base
depths.
Table 1. Statistics of GPR-Estimated Pavement Thicknesses
Segment Cores (Dir*)
Bituminous Thickness
(inches)
Average
Standard
Deviation Min. Max.
10th
Percentile
Creek Ave (Dodd Rd – Aztec Ln) PC-1 (WB) 3.4 0.5 2.8 4.4 3.0
Fox Pl (Creek Ave – Aztec Ln) PC-2 (NB) 3.3 0.4 2.4 4.7 2.8
Hokah Ave (Dodd Rd – Aztec Ln) PC-3 (EB) 3.2 0.7 2.5 4.7 2.8
Pagel Rd (Dodd Rd – Havenview Ct) PC-15 (SB) 3.6 0.5 2.3 6.0 3.1
Page 75 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 3
Segment Cores (Dir*)
Bituminous Thickness
(inches)
Average
Standard
Deviation Min. Max.
10th
Percentile
Pueblo Dr (Keokuk Ln – Cul-de-sac) PC-9 (NB) 3.4 0.9 2.7 5.6 3.0
Apache St (Decorah Ln – Pueblo Ln) PC-10 (NB) 3.7 0.6 2.9 5.3 3.1
PC-8 (SB)
Navajo Ln (Pontiac Pl – Pueblo Ln) PC-6 3.6 0.6 2.7 5.0 3.1
Decorah Ln (Apache St – Huber Dr)
PC-5 (WB)
4.4 1.0 2.5 7.1 3.4
PC-14 (EB)
Ocala Ln (Pontiac Pl – Decorah Ln) PC-4 (SB) 3.6 0.8 2.5 6.2 2.9
Cheyenne Ln (Pontiac Pl – Huber Dr) PC-12 (WB) 4.2 0.6 3.4 5.7 3.8
Hazel Ct/Havenview Ct (Cul-de-sac to
cul-de-sac) PC-16 (WB) 3.9 0.8 3.0 6.2 3.1
Pueblo Ln (Mohican Ln – Decorah Ln) PC-7 (SB) 3.6 0.8 2.6 7.1 3.0
Ocala Ct (Ocala Ln – Cul-de-sac) ---** 3.8 0.7 3.0 5.0 3.3
Nashua Ln (Decorah Ln – Cheyenne
Ln) PC-13 (SB) 3.5 0.5 2.5 5.3 3.0
Apache Ln (Cul-de-sac – Apache Ct) PC-17 (EB) 4.5 1.1 2.5 7.4 3.5
Apache Ct (Cul-de-sac – Huber Dr) ---** 3.3 0.6 1.8 4.9 2.7
Mohican Ln (Pueblo Dr – Cul-de-sac) PC-11 (NB) 3.6 0.8 2.1 7.1 3.0
*Travel Direction (Dir) the pavement cores were performed in.
**Pavement core was not performed on this specified segment.
Pavement Core and Hand Auger Boring Results
We performed pavement coring and hand auger borings at 17 locations along the various residential
segments on the project, as shown in the sketch in the Appendix. Hand auger borings were also
performed through the aggregate base layer and into the shallow subgrade in core locations.
Page 76 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 4
The pavement cores and hand auger borings were used to measure pavement layer thicknesses for the
bituminous and aggregate base layers, to assess bituminous conditions, and verify the shallow subgrade
soil type. The results are provided in Table 2. Photos of the pavement cores and apparent aggregate
base, as well as shallow subgrade soils encountered are also included in the Appendix.
Table 2. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Boring Results
Core Number Location
Bituminous
Thickness
(inches)
Apparent
Aggregate
Base
Thickness
(inches)
Total
Thickness
(inches) Core Condition
PC-1 Creek Ave 3 1/2 5 8 1/2
Low to moderate severity stripping;
Debonding at 2 inches below
surface.
PC-2 Fox Pl 3 1/4 4 7 1/4 Low severity stripping.
PC-3 Hokah Ave 4 5 9 Moderate to high severity stripping
throughout.
PC-4 Ocala Ln 3 3/4 7 10 3/4 Good core condition.
PC-5
Decorah Ln
5 7 12
Upper 1 1/2 inches good condition;
Moderate to high severity stripping
in bottom 3 1/2 inches.
PC-14 5 3/4 11 16 3/4 Good core condition.
PC-6 Navajo Ln 4 1/2 8 12 1/2 Highly deteriorated; Debonding at 2
1/2 inches.
PC-7 Pueblo Ln 3 7 10 High severity stripping throughout.
PC-9 Pueblo Dr 3 6 9 Highly deteriorated; debonding at 1
1/2 inches.
PC-8
Apache St
3 6 9 Low to moderate deterioration.
PC-10 4 7 11 Moderate to high severity stripping;
surface deterioration.
PC-11 Mohican
Ln 4 5 9 Surface deterioration; low core
deterioration.
PC-12 Cheyenne
Ln 4 1/2 8 12 1/2 Good core condition.
PC-13 Nashua Ln 3 4 7 Highly deteriorated.
PC-15 Pagel Rd 3 1/2 7 10 1/2 Low to moderate severity stripping.
PC-16 Havenview
Ct/Hazel Ct 3 1/4 7 10 1/4
Moderate to high core
deterioration; debonding at 1 1/2
inches.
PC-17 Apache Ln 3 1/2 5 8 1/2 Highly deteriorated.
Page 77 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 5
As noted in the table, most of the cores were observed to have underlying stripping and even
deterioration. Stripping is the deterioration of the asphalt/aggregate bond in a bituminous pavement due
to the presence of moisture. Stripping often begins at the bottom of the bituminous layer, where it may
be in contact with saturated aggregate or soil and proceeds upward.
Low-severity stripping is common in bituminous pavements over time. However, those that have
stripped to moderate to severe degrees would typically not be considered for rehabilitation methods
that may leave any damaged portions of the pavement in place, such as mill-and-overlay.
Pavement Recommendations
The results from the GPR, pavement cores and hand auger borings collected for the Friendly Hills
Neighborhood provides additional information regarding the in-situ pavement section (bituminous and
apparent aggregate base). The results indicate the pavement section is generally in fair to poor condition.
Our pavement recommendations for the Friendly Hills Neighborhood are unchanged from the Revised
Geotechnical Report.
However, we understand the City is interested in determining the feasibility of a mill and overlay
approach on some or all of the streets. We have provided recommendations for mill and overlay for the
City to consider on some of the streets, with the understanding that pavement life expectancy should be
anticipated to be reduced as compared to full depth reclamation.
Mill-and-Overlay
If the City elects using a mill and overlay option, the streets listed below could be potential candidates
with the understanding that anticipated pavement life expectancy should be limited to 12 to 15 years:
Creek Avenue
Decorah Lane
Pueblo Lane
Apache Street
Mohican Lane/Court
Pagel Road
We recommend milling these pavements, to a depth of about 2 inches, in accordance with MnDOT
Specification 2232.
Page 78 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 6
In addition, the following streets could be potential candidates for an edge-mill and overlay option, with
anticipated pavement life expectancy of 10 to 12 years:
Fox Place
Hokah Avenue
Ocala Lane
Navajo Lane
Cheyenne Lane
Following the milling, place a 2-inch bituminous overlay meeting bituminous wear course mix
SPWEA340B (MnDOT Material Specification 2360). Pavement depth can vary between the boring and
core locations. The contractor may need to adjust the mill depth to account for unexpected conditions
such as areas of thin pavement.
The surface condition prior to milling can indicate where deeper repairs to the milled surface may be
necessary to improve the life of the overlay. This includes distresses such as severe longitudinal and
transverse cracking, alligator/fatigue cracking of any severity, potholes, edge cracking, and similar
failures. MnDOT defines these distresses in their surface rating procedure as follows:
High-severity transverse cracking: Any crack running transverse to the centerline of the
roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), have large
areas of spalling, missing material and/or potholes.
High-severity longitudinal cracking: Any crack running parallel to the centerline of the
roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), large areas of
spalling, missing material and/or potholes.
Alligator cracking: A series of interconnected cracks forming many-sided, sharp-angled
pieces, 6 inches or less in size, typically located in the wheel paths and under concentrated
traffic loads.
We recommend an experienced engineer walk the milled surface to delineate areas for these repairs
based on conditions exposed by the milling process. We recommend performing the full-depth mill to at
least 1-foot beyond the edge of the visible distresses where present.
Page 79 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 7
Procedures
GPR Data Collection
GPR data was collected on October 15, 2024. GPR collection occurred at posted speed limits and data
was recorded continuously along the pavement to a depth of up to 2 feet. Analysis of this data provides a
continuous estimate of layer thickness for identifiable layers.
Scans of the pavement were collected according to GSSI, Inc. (manufacturer) SIR-20 processor settings at
a specified interval of approximately one scan per lineal foot in the outer wheel path. A calibration file,
required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing. The RoadScan system from GSSI,
Inc. allows for the entry of user marks to note events. This capability was used to mark and tie in core
locations. Distance along the pavement is measured using a Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI).
GPR Analysis
Data collected by the GPR unit was returned to our office and analyzed to estimate the pavement
thickness. Pavement layer interpretation was accomplished using RADAN 7.0, a software package
included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement
layer transitions and automatically calculates their depths from the pavement surface using the
calibration file(s) collected prior to or following testing.
Where “ground-truth” data (cores and hand augers) were performed, the interpreted layers from the
GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the borings to validate the accuracy
of the GPR analysis.
Pavement Coring and Hand Auger Borings
We performed pavement cores on October 15, 2024. Exploration locations were selected based on GPR
results and were conducted using a 4-inch core barrel. The bituminous pavement was repaired with a
cold-mix bituminous patch immediately after coring.
The cores were measured to obtain approximate bituminous thicknesses, and their material conditions
were noted based on visual observation. A sample of underlying base material was obtained at each of
the exploration locations and was sent to our laboratory for review by a geotechnical engineer.
Page 80 of 89
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Project B2402483.00
November 1, 2024
Page 8
Remarks
This Addendum should be attached to and considered a part of our Revised Geotechnical Evaluation
Report. With the exception of any results or recommendations changed by this Addendum, the
information contained in our Revised Geotechnical Evaluation Report remains unchanged.
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
If you have any questions about this Addendum, please contact Zach Semlak at 651.788.5071
(zsemlak@braunintertec.com) or Chris Kufner at 651.248.2850 (ckufner@braunintertec.com).
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Zachary T. Semlak
Staff Engineer
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Christopher R. Kufner, PE
Associate Director, Principal Engineer
License Number: 40897
November 1, 2024
Attachments:
Boring, Pavement Coring, and GPR Testing Location Sketch
Ground Penetrating Radar Data (Graphical Plots)
Photographic Core and Apparent Aggregate Base Log
Page 81 of 89
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.Hokah AveHokah Ave
Alice LaAlice LaCreek AveCreek Ave
Apache StApache StC
h
e
y
e
n
n
e
L
a
C
h
e
y
e
n
n
e
L
aAztec LaAztec LaMend
a
k
ot
a
Dr
Mend
a
k
ot
a
Dr
Fox PlFox Pl¬«149
ST-1 ST-2
ST-3
ST-9
ST-7
ST-13
ST-10
ST-11
ST-5
ST-4
ST-6
ST-8
PC-1
PC-2
PC-3
Cleveland Ave S
Missi
s
s
i
ppiRiver7thSt WHi
g
hway
5
5
Mendota
Heights
Inver Grove
Heights
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:o
0 200100
Feet
Project No:
B2402483.00
ZS
6/27/2024
ZTS
10/29/2024
Boring,
Pavement Coring,
and GPR Testing
Location Sketch
Boring Coring GPR Sketch
Drawing No:
Sheet:
1 of 2F:\2024\B2402483_00\GIS\B2402483.00.aprxMendota Heights
- Friendly
Hills Neighborhood
Improvements
Multiple Streets
Mendota Heights,
Minnesota
1" = 200 Feet
!.Pavement Core Location
!(Sanitary Sewer Soil Borings
!(Watermain Soil Borings
Denotes GPR Testing was
Performed
Source: Google Earth Imagery
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
Page 82 of 89
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.Pueblo DrPueblo DrLake DrLake Dr
Pond View TerPond View TerPond View DrPond View Dr
Ocala
Ct
Ocala
Ct
Hampshi
r
e
D
r
Hampshi
r
e
D
r
Quail Ridge CirQuail Ridge Cir
Pueblo LaPueblo LaHazel
Ct
Hazel
Ct
Bluebill DrBluebill Dr
Apache CtApache CtHampshire CtHampshire CtWagon Wheel TrWagon Wheel Tr Bent
T
ree
LaBent
T
ree
La
Cheri LaCheri LaAlice LaAlice LaPontiac PlPontiac Pl
O
c
a
l
a
L
a
O
c
a
l
a
L
a
Mohican
C
tMohican
C
t
N
a
v
a
j
o
L
a
N
a
v
a
j
o
L
a Nashua LaNashua LaHavenview
C
t
Havenview
C
t
Apache LaApache La
A
p
a
c
h
e
S
t
A
p
a
c
h
e
S
t
Deco
r
a
h
L
a
Deco
r
a
h
L
a
Huber DrHuber DrK
e
o
k
u
k
L
a
K
e
o
k
u
k
L
a
Mohican LaMohican La
C
h
e
y
e
n
n
e
L
a
C
h
e
y
e
n
n
e
L
a
Pagel RdPagel Rd¬«149
ST-12
ST-27
ST-28
ST-30
ST-29
ST-26
ST-24
ST-16
ST-25
ST-23
ST-22
ST-17
ST-18
ST-21
ST-20
ST-19
ST-14
ST-13
ST-11
ST-15
ST-31
ST-32
ST-34
ST-33
PC-15
PC-16
PC-9
PC-11
PC-8 PC-7
PC-10
PC-6
PC-4
PC-12
PC-13
PC-14
PC-5
PC-17
Hi
g
hway
5
5
Mendota
Heights
Inver Grove
Heights
Project Information
Drawing Information
Drawn By:
Drawn Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified:o
0 300150
Feet
Project No:
B2402483.00
ZS
6/27/2024
ZTS
10/29/2024
Boring,
Pavement Coring,
and GPR Testing
Location Sketch
Boring Coring GPR Sketch
Drawing No:
Sheet:
2 of 2F:\2024\B2402483_00\GIS\B2402483.00.aprxMendota Heights
-Friendly
Hills Neighborhood
Improvements
Multiple Streets
Mendota Heights,
Minnesota
1" = 300 Feet
!.Pavement Core Location
!(FDR Soil Borings
!(Sanitary Sewer Soil Borings
!(Watermain Soil Borings
Denotes GPR Testing was
Performed
Source: Google Earth Imagery
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
952.995.2000
braunintertec.com
Page 83 of 89
ROADWAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ROADWAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST 2021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM1520,000.00$ 520,000.00$ 0.3156,000.00$ 0.0526,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.3156,000.00$ 0.0420,800.00$ 0.015,200.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 2101.610PRUNINGEACH20200.00$ 4,000.00$ 102,000.00$ 102,000.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOXEACH31500.00$ 15,500.00$ 189,000.00$ 136,500.00$ 2104.502REMOVE HYDRANTEACH11750.00$ 8,250.00$ 86,000.00$ 32,250.00$ 2104.502REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH6750.00$ 4,500.00$ 64,500.00$ 2104.502SALVAGE CASTINGEACH18350.00$ 6,300.00$ 62,100.00$ 51,750.00$ 41,400.00$ 31,050.00$ 2104.503SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT6372.50$ 1,592.50$ 4851,212.50$ 152380.00$ 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT90415.00$ 13,560.00$ 90413,560.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT21016.00$ 3,360.00$ 2103,360.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT147220.00$ 29,440.00$ 147229,440.00$ 2104.503REMOVE CURB & GUTTERLIN FT181638.00$ 145,304.00$ 593847,504.00$ 9367,488.00$ 281022,480.00$ 2702,160.00$ 745459,632.00$ 5754,600.00$ 1801,440.00$ 2104.504REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ YD16710.00$ 1,670.00$ 67670.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66415.00$ 9,960.00$ 1582,370.00$ 821,230.00$ 1321,980.00$ 2483,720.00$ 44660.00$ 2104.504REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD4666.00$ 2,796.00$ 126756.00$ 120720.00$ 138828.00$ 82492.00$ 2104.518REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282001.50$ 42,300.00$ 2720440,806.00$ 9961,494.00$ 2104.602REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLEEACH61,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 2104.603ABANDON WATER MAINLIN FT78620.00$ 15,720.00$ 78615,720.00$ 2104.603 SAWING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYLIN FT10683.00$ 3,204.00$ 325975.00$ 299897.00$ 279837.00$ 165495.00$ 2104.603SAWING CONCRETE DRIVEWAYLIN FT10174.00$ 4,068.00$ 2641,056.00$ 137548.00$ 220880.00$ 3961,584.00$ 2104.618SALVAGE BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2030.00$ 600.00$ 20600.00$ 2106.507EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD1222030.00$ 366,600.00$ 4788143,640.00$ 782,340.00$ 153546,050.00$ 20600.00$ 5739172,170.00$ 471,410.00$ 13390.00$ 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADECU YD311430.00$ 93,420.00$ 137041,100.00$ 174452,320.00$ 2106.507GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD311420.00$ 62,280.00$ 137027,400.00$ 174434,880.00$ 2106.507COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD10010.00$ 1,000.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2106.601DEWATERINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 2123.510 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610TRACTOR MOUNTED BACKHOEHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610SKID LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR50250.00$ 12,500.00$ 256,250.00$ 256,250.00$ 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5TON507130.00$ 152,130.00$ 162248,660.00$ 822,460.00$ 270581,150.00$ 19570.00$ 58217,460.00$ 471,410.00$ 14420.00$ 2215.504FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONSQ YD874825.00$ 437,410.00$ 41089205,445.00$ 46393231,965.00$ 2360.509TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON7600100.00$ 760,000.00$ 3590359,000.00$ 4010401,000.00$ 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON1264095.00$ 1,200,800.00$ 5970 567,150.00$ 6670 633,650.00$ 2360.609TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C) (DRIVEWAYS)TON702120.00$ 84,240.00$ 19823,760.00$ 16219,440.00$ 21625,920.00$ 12615,120.00$ 2451.609GRANULAR BACKFILLTON10060.00$ 6,000.00$ 1006,000.00$ 2502.602 PROTECT, SALVAGE, RESTORE, OR REPLACE IRRIGATION, PER LOT EACH50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 25 12,500.00$ 25 12,500.00$ 2503.50324" PVC PIPE SEWERLIN FT1432125.00$ 179,000.00$ 1432179,000.00$ 2503.601TEMPORARY SEWER BYPASSLUMP SUM150,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 2503.602RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICEEACH171,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 1717,000.00$ 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREACH22,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH91,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 710,500.00$ 23,000.00$ 2503.602PVC WYEEACH182,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 1836,000.00$ 2503.602ODOR CONTROL UNITEACH250,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 2100,000.00$ 2503.6036" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPELIN FT25065.00$ 16,250.00$ 25016,250.00$ 2503.603 RC PIPE SEWER (12" TO 18")LIN FT167785.00$ 142,545.00$ 1095 93,075.00$ 582 49,470.00$ 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH162,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 918,000.00$ 714,000.00$ 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH1051,500.00$ 157,500.00$ 75112,500.00$ 3045,000.00$ 2504.602HYDRANTEACH115,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 840,000.00$ 315,000.00$ 2504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOXEACH62250.00$ 15,500.00$ 369,000.00$ 266,500.00$ 2504.6021" CORPORATION STOPEACH1051,200.00$ 126,000.00$ 7590,000.00$ 3036,000.00$ 2504.6026" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH113,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 824,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 2504.6028" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH203,500.00$ 70,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 2504.602SACRIFICIAL ANODE BAGEACH453,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 2781,000.00$ 1854,000.00$ 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPELIN FT20065.00$ 13,000.00$ 1006,500.00$ 1006,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT162075.00$ 121,500.00$ 1620121,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN (PIPE BURST)LIN FT509085.00$ 432,650.00$ 2871244,035.00$ 2219188,615.00$ 2504.608DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND230420.00$ 46,080.00$ 154830,960.00$ 75615,120.00$ 2506.602 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (SANITARY)EACH82,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 510,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 2506.602CONST SANITARY MANHOLEEACH912,000.00$ 108,000.00$ 9108,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (SANITARY MANHOLE)EACH811,000.00$ 81,000.00$ 4949,000.00$ 3232,000.00$ 2506.602CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (STORM MANHOLE)EACH26,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 212,000.00$ 2506.602CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (CATCH BASIN)EACH175,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 1260,000.00$ 525,000.00$ 2506.602 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM MANHOLE)EACH12 1,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM CATCH BASIN)EACH931,000.00$ 93,000.00$ 5252,000.00$ 4141,000.00$ 2506.602FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (STORM)EACH102,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 612,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 2506.604CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDENSQ YD500110.00$ 55,000.00$ 25027,500.00$ 25027,500.00$ 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282002.50$ 70,500.00$ 27204 68,010.00$ 996 2,490.00$ 2521.618CONCRETE WALKSQ FT150020.00$ 30,000.00$ 901,800.00$ 81016,200.00$ 60012,000.00$ 2531.503CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT446422.00$ 98,208.00$ 48810,736.00$ 281061,820.00$ 59113,002.00$ 57512,650.00$ 2531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66485.00$ 56,440.00$ 15813,430.00$ 826,970.00$ 13211,220.00$ 24821,080.00$ 443,740.00$ 2531.601 DECORATIVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ALLOWANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 2531.603CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 (SPOT CURB)LIN FT1369925.00$ 342,475.00$ 5938148,450.00$ 44811,200.00$ 2706,750.00$ 6863171,575.00$ 1804,500.00$ 2531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT16065.00$ 10,400.00$ 966,240.00$ 644,160.00$ 2540.601MAIL BOX MAINTENANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 2540.618 INSTALL BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2070.00$ 1,400.00$ 201,400.00$ 2563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM140,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 0.520,000.00$ 0.520,000.00$ 2564.601SIGNINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 0.510,000.00$ 0.510,000.00$ 2573.501STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM110,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 0.55,000.00$ 0.55,000.00$ 2573.601EROSION CONTROLLUMP SUM175,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 0.537,500.00$ 0.537,500.00$ 2574.507BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD134550.00$ 67,250.00$ 44022,000.00$ 693,450.00$ 20810,400.00$ 201,000.00$ 55227,600.00$ 432,150.00$ 13650.00$ 2575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD807312.00$ 96,876.00$ 263931,668.00$ 4164,992.00$ 124914,988.00$ 1201,440.00$ 331339,756.00$ 2563,072.00$ 80960.00$ 2582.50312" SOLID LINE MULTI COMPLIN FT17815.00$ 2,670.00$ 1602,400.00$ 18270.00$ 2582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT75003.00$ 22,500.00$ 578017,340.00$ 17205,160.00$ 2582.503 4" BROKEN LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT3503.50$ 1,225.00$ 3501,225.00$ 2582.5034" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT28903.50$ 10,115.00$ 289010,115.00$ 2582.518PAVT MSSG MULTI COMPSQ FT3025.00$ 750.00$ 30750.00$ 7,431,838.50$ 2,026,671.50$ 398,806.00$ 941,078.00$ 9,000.00$ 912,295.00$ 126,016.00$ 2,224,424.00$ 239,469.00$ 44,250.00$ 6,500.00$ 487,345.00$ 15,984.00$ 743,183.85$ 202,667.15$ 39,880.60$ 94,107.80$ 900.00$ 91,229.50$ 12,601.60$ 222,442.40$ 23,946.90$ 4,425.00$ 650.00$ 48,734.50$ 1,598.40$ 966,481.01$ 445,867.73$ 27,723.52$ 489,373.28$ 3,516.48$ 230,940.60$ 150,528.68$ 80,411.93$ 9,372,443.96$ 2,675,206.38$ 438,686.60$ 1,035,185.80$ 9,900.00$ 1,154,053.18$ 166,341.12$ 2,936,239.68$ 263,415.90$ 48,675.00$ 7,150.00$ 616,491.43$ 21,098.88$ 4,325,319.90$ 5,479,373.08$ 3,276,579.46$ 3,893,070.89$ 5,611,446.06$ 2,805,723.03$ 7,686.91$ ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - ALL FDR ALTERNATIVESUBTOTAL10% CONTINGENCY20% INDIRECT COSTS (CITY) CP 202407 2025 PROJECT AREA 2026 PROJECT AREA TOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTASSESSMENT AMOUNT (50%)PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER UNIT15% INDIRECT COSTS (SPRWS)TOTAL2025 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)2025 PROJECT TOTAL2026 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)2026 PROJECT TOTALASSESSSMENT SUMMARY - 365 PROPERTIESPage 84 of 89
ROADWAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ROADWAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST 2021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM1520,000.00$ 520,000.00$ 0.3156,000.00$ 0.0526,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.3156,000.00$ 0.0420,800.00$ 0.015,200.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 2101.610PRUNINGHOUR20200.00$ 4,000.00$ 102,000.00$ 102,000.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOXEACH31500.00$ 15,500.00$ 189,000.00$ 136,500.00$ 2104.502REMOVE HYDRANTEACH11750.00$ 8,250.00$ 86,000.00$ 32,250.00$ 2104.502REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH6750.00$ 4,500.00$ 64,500.00$ 2104.502SALVAGE CASTINGEACH18350.00$ 6,300.00$ 62,100.00$ 51,750.00$ 41,400.00$ 31,050.00$ 2104.503SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT6372.50$ 1,592.50$ 4851,212.50$ 152380.00$ 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT90415.00$ 13,560.00$ 90413,560.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT21016.00$ 3,360.00$ 2103,360.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT147220.00$ 29,440.00$ 147229,440.00$ 2104.503REMOVE CURB & GUTTERLIN FT101358.00$ 81,080.00$ 499739,976.00$ 9367,488.00$ 281022,480.00$ 2702,160.00$ 3672,936.00$ 5754,600.00$ 1801,440.00$ 2104.504REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ YD16710.00$ 1,670.00$ 67670.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66415.00$ 9,960.00$ 1582,370.00$ 821,230.00$ 1321,980.00$ 2483,720.00$ 44660.00$ 2104.504REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD4666.00$ 2,796.00$ 126756.00$ 120720.00$ 138828.00$ 82492.00$ 2104.518REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282001.50$ 42,300.00$ 2720440,806.00$ 9961,494.00$ 2104.602REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLEEACH61,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 2104.603ABANDON WATER MAINLIN FT78620.00$ 15,720.00$ 78615,720.00$ 2104.603 SAWING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYLIN FT10683.00$ 3,204.00$ 325975.00$ 299897.00$ 279837.00$ 165495.00$ 2104.603SAWING CONCRETE DRIVEWAYLIN FT10174.00$ 4,068.00$ 2641,056.00$ 137548.00$ 220880.00$ 3961,584.00$ 2104.618SALVAGE BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2030.00$ 600.00$ 20600.00$ 2106.507EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD900030.00$ 270,000.00$ 3895116,850.00$ 782,340.00$ 153546,050.00$ 20600.00$ 3412102,360.00$ 471,410.00$ 13390.00$ 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADECU YD214830.00$ 64,440.00$ 110233,060.00$ 104631,380.00$ 2106.507GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD214820.00$ 42,960.00$ 110222,040.00$ 104620,920.00$ 2106.507COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD10010.00$ 1,000.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2106.601DEWATERINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 2123.510 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610TRACTOR MOUNTED BACKHOEHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610SKID LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2123.610STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR50250.00$ 12,500.00$ 256,250.00$ 256,250.00$ 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5TON507130.00$ 152,130.00$ 162248,660.00$ 822,460.00$ 270581,150.00$ 19570.00$ 58217,460.00$ 471,410.00$ 14420.00$ 2215.504FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONSQ YD584955.00$ 292,475.00$ 33049165,245.00$ 25446127,230.00$ 2232.504MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD285873.00$ 85,761.00$ 804024,120.00$ 2054761,641.00$ 2360.509TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON8433100.00$ 843,300.00$ 3821382,100.00$ 4612461,200.00$ 2360.509TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON847395.00$ 804,935.00$ 4814457,330.00$ 3659347,605.00$ 2360.609TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C) (DRIVEWAYS)TON702120.00$ 84,240.00$ 19823,760.00$ 16219,440.00$ 21625,920.00$ 12615,120.00$ 2451.609 GRANULAR BACKFILLTON10060.00$ 6,000.00$ 1006,000.00$ 2502.602PROTECT, SALVAGE, RESTORE, OR REPLACE IRRIGATION, PER LOTEACH50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2503.50324" PVC PIPE SEWERLIN FT1432125.00$ 179,000.00$ 1432179,000.00$ 2503.601 TEMPORARY SEWER BYPASSLUMP SUM150,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 2503.602RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICEEACH171,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 1717,000.00$ 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREACH22,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH91,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 710,500.00$ 23,000.00$ 2503.602PVC WYEEACH182,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 1836,000.00$ 2503.602 ODOR CONTROL UNITEACH250,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 2100,000.00$ 2503.6036" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPELIN FT25065.00$ 16,250.00$ 25016,250.00$ 2503.603RC PIPE SEWER (12" TO 18")LIN FT167785.00$ 142,545.00$ 109593,075.00$ 58249,470.00$ 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH162,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 918,000.00$ 714,000.00$ 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH1051,500.00$ 157,500.00$ 75112,500.00$ 3045,000.00$ 2504.602HYDRANTEACH115,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 840,000.00$ 315,000.00$ 2504.602ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOXEACH62250.00$ 15,500.00$ 369,000.00$ 266,500.00$ 2504.6021" CORPORATION STOPEACH1051,200.00$ 126,000.00$ 7590,000.00$ 3036,000.00$ 2504.6026" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH113,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 824,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH203,500.00$ 70,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 2504.602SACRIFICIAL ANODE BAGEACH453,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 2781,000.00$ 1854,000.00$ 2504.6031" TYPE K COPPER PIPELIN FT20065.00$ 13,000.00$ 1006,500.00$ 1006,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT162075.00$ 121,500.00$ 1620121,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN (PIPE BURST)LIN FT509085.00$ 432,650.00$ 2871244,035.00$ 2219188,615.00$ 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND230420.00$ 46,080.00$ 154830,960.00$ 756 15,120.00$ 2506.602FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (SANITARY)EACH82,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 510,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 2506.602CONST SANITARY MANHOLEEACH912,000.00$ 108,000.00$ 9108,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (SANITARY MANHOLE)EACH811,000.00$ 81,000.00$ 4949,000.00$ 3232,000.00$ 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (STORM MANHOLE)EACH26,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 212,000.00$ 2506.602CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (CATCH BASIN)EACH175,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 1260,000.00$ 525,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM MANHOLE)EACH121,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM CATCH BASIN)EACH931,000.00$ 93,000.00$ 5252,000.00$ 4141,000.00$ 2506.602FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (STORM)EACH102,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 612,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 2506.604 CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDENSQ YD500110.00$ 55,000.00$ 250 27,500.00$ 250 27,500.00$ 2521.5183" BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282002.50$ 70,500.00$ 2720468,010.00$ 9962,490.00$ 2521.618CONCRETE WALKSQ FT150020.00$ 30,000.00$ 901,800.00$ 81016,200.00$ 60012,000.00$ 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT446422.00$ 98,208.00$ 488 10,736.00$ 281061,820.00$ 59113,002.00$ 575 12,650.00$ 2531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66485.00$ 56,440.00$ 15813,430.00$ 826,970.00$ 13211,220.00$ 24821,080.00$ 443,740.00$ 2531.601DECORATIVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ALLOWANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 2531.603CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 (SPOT CURB)LIN FT626225.00$ 156,550.00$ 4997124,925.00$ 44811,200.00$ 2706,750.00$ 3679,175.00$ 1804,500.00$ 2531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT16065.00$ 10,400.00$ 966,240.00$ 644,160.00$ 2540.601MAIL BOX MAINTENANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 2540.618INSTALL BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2070.00$ 1,400.00$ 201,400.00$ 2563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM140,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 0.520,000.00$ 0.520,000.00$ 2564.601SIGNINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 0.510,000.00$ 0.510,000.00$ 2573.501STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM110,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 0.55,000.00$ 0.55,000.00$ 2573.601EROSION CONTROLLUMP SUM175,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 0.537,500.00$ 0.537,500.00$ 2574.507BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD89650.00$ 44,800.00$ 39319,650.00$ 693,450.00$ 20810,400.00$ 201,000.00$ 1507,500.00$ 432,150.00$ 13650.00$ 2575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD479212.00$ 57,503.00$ 222126,652.00$ 4164,992.00$ 124914,988.00$ 1201,440.00$ 4505,399.00$ 2563,072.00$ 80960.00$ 2582.503 12" SOLID LINE MULTI COMPLIN FT17815.00$ 2,670.00$ 1602,400.00$ 18270.00$ 2582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT75003.00$ 22,500.00$ 578017,340.00$ 17205,160.00$ 2582.5034" BROKEN LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT3503.50$ 1,225.00$ 3501,225.00$ 2582.5034" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT28903.50$ 10,115.00$ 289010,115.00$ 2582.518PAVT MSSG MULTI COMPSQ FT3025.00$ 750.00$ 30750.00$ 6,603,227.50$ 1,845,262.50$ 398,806.00$ 941,078.00$ 9,000.00$ 912,295.00$ 126,016.00$ 1,577,222.00$ 239,469.00$ 44,250.00$ 6,500.00$ 487,345.00$ 15,984.00$ 660,322.75$ 184,526.25$ 39,880.60$ 94,107.80$ 900.00$ 91,229.50$ 12,601.60$ 157,722.20$ 23,946.90$ 4,425.00$ 650.00$ 48,734.50$ 1,598.40$ 784,186.59$ 405,957.75$ 27,723.52$ 346,988.84$ 3,516.48$ 230,940.60$ 150,528.68$ 80,411.93$ 8,278,677.44$ 2,435,746.50$ 438,686.60$ 1,035,185.80$ 9,900.00$ 1,154,053.18$ 166,341.12$ 2,081,933.04$ 263,415.90$ 48,675.00$ 7,150.00$ 616,491.43$ 21,098.88$ 4,085,860.02$ 5,239,913.20$ 2,422,272.82$ 3,038,764.25$ 4,517,679.54$ 2,258,839.77$ 6,188.60$ TOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTASSESSMENT AMOUNT (50%)PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER UNIT15% INDIRECT COSTS (SPRWS)TOTAL2025 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)2025 PROJECT TOTAL2026 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)2026 PROJECT TOTALASSESSSMENT SUMMARY - 365 PROPERTIESENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - MILL & OVERLAY ALTERNATIVESUBTOTAL10% CONTINGENCY20% INDIRECT COSTS (CITY) CP 202407 2025 PROJECT AREA 2026 PROJECT AREA Page 85 of 89
ROADWAY - FDR (ASSESSABLE) ROADWAY - MILL & OVERLAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ROADWAY - FDR (ASSESSABLE) ROADWAY - MILL & OVERLAY (ASSESSABLE) STORM SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) SANITARY SEWER (NON-ASSESSABLE) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (CITY) WATERMAIN (NON-ASSESSABLE) (SPRWS) CITY PARK, TRAIL, AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS (NON-ASSESSABLE) ITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY COST 2021.501MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM1520,000.00$ 520,000.00$ 0.2104,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.0526,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.2104,000.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 0.0420,800.00$ 0.015,200.00$ 0.152,000.00$ 2101.610PRUNINGHOUR20200.00$ 4,000.00$ 51,000.00$ 51,000.00$ 51,000.00$ 51,000.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOXEACH31500.00$ 15,500.00$ 189,000.00$ 136,500.00$ 2104.502REMOVE HYDRANTEACH11750.00$ 8,250.00$ 86,000.00$ 32,250.00$ 2104.502REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH6750.00$ 4,500.00$ 64,500.00$ 2104.502SALVAGE CASTINGEACH18350.00$ 6,300.00$ 62,100.00$ 51,750.00$ 41,400.00$ 31,050.00$ 2104.503SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT6372.50$ 1,592.50$ 260650.00$ 225562.50$ 80200.00$ 72180.00$ 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT90415.00$ 13,560.00$ 90413,560.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT21016.00$ 3,360.00$ 2103,360.00$ 2104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT147220.00$ 29,440.00$ 147229,440.00$ 2104.503REMOVE CURB & GUTTERLIN FT101358.00$ 81,080.00$ 452736,216.00$ 4703,760.00$ 9367,488.00$ 281022,480.00$ 2702,160.00$ 2722,176.00$ 95760.00$ 5754,600.00$ 1801,440.00$ 2104.504REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ YD16710.00$ 1,670.00$ 67670.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66415.00$ 9,960.00$ 1582,370.00$ 821,230.00$ 1321,980.00$ 2483,720.00$ 44660.00$ 2104.504REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD4666.00$ 2,796.00$ 126756.00$ 120720.00$ 138828.00$ 82492.00$ 2104.518REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282001.50$ 42,300.00$ 2720440,806.00$ 9961,494.00$ 2104.602REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLEEACH61,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 69,000.00$ 2104.603ABANDON WATER MAINLIN FT78620.00$ 15,720.00$ 78615,720.00$ 2104.603 SAWING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYLIN FT10683.00$ 3,204.00$ 325975.00$ 299897.00$ 279837.00$ 165495.00$ 2104.603SAWING CONCRETE DRIVEWAYLIN FT10174.00$ 4,068.00$ 2641,056.00$ 137548.00$ 220880.00$ 3961,584.00$ 2104.618SALVAGE BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2030.00$ 600.00$ 20600.00$ 2106.507EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD900030.00$ 270,000.00$ 3895116,850.00$ 782,340.00$ 153546,050.00$ 20600.00$ 3412102,360.00$ 471,410.00$ 13390.00$ 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADECU YD214830.00$ 64,440.00$ 110233,060.00$ 104631,380.00$ 2106.507GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD214820.00$ 42,960.00$ 110222,040.00$ 104620,920.00$ 2106.507COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD10010.00$ 1,000.00$ 1001,000.00$ 2106.601DEWATERINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 2123.510 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 2123.610TRACTOR MOUNTED BACKHOEHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 2123.610SKID LOADERHOUR50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 168,000.00$ 94,500.00$ 2123.610STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR50250.00$ 12,500.00$ 164,000.00$ 92,250.00$ 164,000.00$ 92,250.00$ 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5TON507130.00$ 152,130.00$ 162248,660.00$ 822,460.00$ 270581,150.00$ 19570.00$ 58217,460.00$ 471,410.00$ 14420.00$ 2215.504FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONSQ YD584955.00$ 292,475.00$ 33049165,245.00$ 25446127,230.00$ 2232.504MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD285873.00$ 85,761.00$ 804024,120.00$ 2054761,641.00$ 2360.509TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON8433100.00$ 843,300.00$ 3128312,800.00$ 69369,300.00$ 2805280,500.00$ 1807180,700.00$ 2360.509TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON847395.00$ 804,935.00$ 4814457,330.00$ 3659347,605.00$ 2360.609TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C) (DRIVEWAYS)TON702120.00$ 84,240.00$ 19823,760.00$ 16219,440.00$ 21625,920.00$ 12615,120.00$ 2451.609 GRANULAR BACKFILLTON10060.00$ 6,000.00$ 1006,000.00$ 2502.602PROTECT, SALVAGE, RESTORE, OR REPLACE IRRIGATION, PER LOTEACH50500.00$ 25,000.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2512,500.00$ 2503.50324" PVC PIPE SEWERLIN FT1432125.00$ 179,000.00$ 1432179,000.00$ 2503.601 TEMPORARY SEWER BYPASSLUMP SUM150,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 2503.602RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICEEACH171,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 1717,000.00$ 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREACH22,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2503.602CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH91,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 710,500.00$ 23,000.00$ 2503.602PVC WYEEACH182,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 1836,000.00$ 2503.602 ODOR CONTROL UNITEACH250,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 2100,000.00$ 2503.6036" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPELIN FT25065.00$ 16,250.00$ 25016,250.00$ 2503.603RC PIPE SEWER (12" TO 18")LIN FT167785.00$ 142,545.00$ 109593,075.00$ 58249,470.00$ 2504.602CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH162,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 918,000.00$ 714,000.00$ 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH1051,500.00$ 157,500.00$ 75112,500.00$ 3045,000.00$ 2504.602HYDRANTEACH115,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 840,000.00$ 315,000.00$ 2504.602ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOXEACH62250.00$ 15,500.00$ 369,000.00$ 266,500.00$ 2504.6021" CORPORATION STOPEACH1051,200.00$ 126,000.00$ 7590,000.00$ 3036,000.00$ 2504.6026" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH113,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 824,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOXEACH203,500.00$ 70,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 1035,000.00$ 2504.602SACRIFICIAL ANODE BAGEACH453,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 2781,000.00$ 1854,000.00$ 2504.6031" TYPE K COPPER PIPELIN FT20065.00$ 13,000.00$ 1006,500.00$ 1006,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52LIN FT162075.00$ 121,500.00$ 1620121,500.00$ 2504.6038" WATERMAIN (PIPE BURST)LIN FT509085.00$ 432,650.00$ 2871244,035.00$ 2219188,615.00$ 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGSPOUND230420.00$ 46,080.00$ 154830,960.00$ 756 15,120.00$ 2506.602FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (SANITARY)EACH82,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 510,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 2506.602CONST SANITARY MANHOLEEACH912,000.00$ 108,000.00$ 9108,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (SANITARY MANHOLE)EACH811,000.00$ 81,000.00$ 4949,000.00$ 3232,000.00$ 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (STORM MANHOLE)EACH26,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 212,000.00$ 2506.602CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (CATCH BASIN)EACH175,000.00$ 85,000.00$ 1260,000.00$ 525,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM MANHOLE)EACH121,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 2506.602ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM CATCH BASIN)EACH931,000.00$ 93,000.00$ 5252,000.00$ 4141,000.00$ 2506.602FURNISH & INSTALL NEW RINGS AND CASTINGS (STORM)EACH102,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 612,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 2506.604 CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDENSQ YD500110.00$ 55,000.00$ 250 27,500.00$ 250 27,500.00$ 2521.5183" BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT282002.50$ 70,500.00$ 2720468,010.00$ 9962,490.00$ 2521.618CONCRETE WALKSQ FT150020.00$ 30,000.00$ 901,800.00$ 81016,200.00$ 60012,000.00$ 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT446422.00$ 98,208.00$ 488 10,736.00$ 281061,820.00$ 59113,002.00$ 575 12,650.00$ 2531.5046" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD66485.00$ 56,440.00$ 15813,430.00$ 826,970.00$ 13211,220.00$ 24821,080.00$ 443,740.00$ 2531.601DECORATIVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ALLOWANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 0.515,000.00$ 2531.603CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 (SPOT CURB)LIN FT626225.00$ 156,550.00$ 4527113,175.00$ 47011,750.00$ 44811,200.00$ 2706,750.00$ 2726,800.00$ 952,375.00$ 1804,500.00$ 2531.618TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT16065.00$ 10,400.00$ 966,240.00$ 644,160.00$ 2540.601MAIL BOX MAINTENANCELUMP SUM130,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 0.39,000.00$ 0.26,000.00$ 0.39,000.00$ 0.26,000.00$ 2540.618INSTALL BRICK PAVERSSQ FT2070.00$ 1,400.00$ 201,400.00$ 2563.601TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM140,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 0.3514,000.00$ 0.156,000.00$ 0.3514,000.00$ 0.156,000.00$ 2564.601SIGNINGLUMP SUM120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 0.357,000.00$ 0.153,000.00$ 0.357,000.00$ 0.153,000.00$ 2573.501STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM110,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 0.353,500.00$ 0.151,500.00$ 0.353,500.00$ 0.151,500.00$ 2573.601EROSION CONTROLLUMP SUM175,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 0.3526,250.00$ 0.1511,250.00$ 0.3526,250.00$ 0.1511,250.00$ 2574.507BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD89650.00$ 44,800.00$ 37018,500.00$ 231,150.00$ 693,450.00$ 20810,400.00$ 201,000.00$ 1256,250.00$ 251,250.00$ 432,150.00$ 13650.00$ 2575.504SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD479212.00$ 57,503.00$ 201224,144.00$ 2092,508.00$ 4164,992.00$ 124914,988.00$ 1201,440.00$ 3354,020.00$ 1151,379.00$ 2563,072.00$ 80960.00$ 2582.503 12" SOLID LINE MULTI COMPLIN FT17815.00$ 2,670.00$ 801,200.00$ 801,200.00$ 18270.00$ 2582.5034" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT75003.00$ 22,500.00$ 10803,240.00$ 470014,100.00$ 17205,160.00$ 2582.5034" BROKEN LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT3503.50$ 1,225.00$ 3501,225.00$ 2582.5034" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP (WR)LIN FT28903.50$ 10,115.00$ 5401,890.00$ 23508,225.00$ 2582.518PAVT MSSG MULTI COMPSQ FT3025.00$ 750.00$ 30750.00$ 6,603,227.50$ 1,612,087.00$ 233,175.50$ 398,806.00$ 941,078.00$ 9,000.00$ 912,295.00$ 126,016.00$ 1,225,782.00$ 351,440.00$ 239,469.00$ 44,250.00$ 6,500.00$ 487,345.00$ 15,984.00$ 660,322.75$ 161,208.70$ 23,317.55$ 39,880.60$ 94,107.80$ 900.00$ 91,229.50$ 12,601.60$ 122,578.20$ 35,144.00$ 23,946.90$ 4,425.00$ 650.00$ 48,734.50$ 1,598.40$ 784,186.59$ 354,659.14$ 51,298.61$ 27,723.52$ 269,672.04$ 77,316.80$ 3,516.48$ 230,940.60$ 150,528.68$ 80,411.93$ 8,278,677.44$ 2,127,954.84$ 307,791.66$ 438,686.60$ 1,035,185.80$ 9,900.00$ 1,154,053.18$ 166,341.12$ 1,618,032.24$ 463,900.80$ 263,415.90$ 48,675.00$ 7,150.00$ 616,491.43$ 21,098.88$ 4,085,860.02$ 5,239,913.20$ 2,422,272.82$ 3,038,764.25$ 3,745,987.08$ 1,872,993.54$ 7,462.13$ 771,692.46$ 385,846.23$ 3,384.62$ 2025 PROJECT TOTAL 2026 PROJECT AREA 2025 PROJECT AREA CP 202407 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - MILL & OVERLAY ALTERNATIVESUBTOTAL10% CONTINGENCY20% INDIRECT COSTS (CITY)15% INDIRECT COSTS (SPRWS)TOTAL2025 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)ASSESSMENT AMOUNT (MILL & OVERLAY PROPERTIES)PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER UNIT (114 - MILL & OVERLAY PROPERTIES)2026 PROJECT TOTAL (CITY)2026 PROJECT TOTALTOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTS (FDR PROPERTIES)ASSESSMENT AMOUNT (FDR PROPERTIES)PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT PER UNIT (FDR PROPERTIES)TOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTS (MILL & OVERLAY PROPERTIES)FDR ASSESSSMENT SUMMARY - 251 PROPERTIESMILL & OVERLAY ASSESSSMENT SUMMARY - 114 PROPERTIESPage 86 of 89
Page 87 of 89
Page 88 of 89
CHERI
LN
A
P
A
C
H
E
L
NDODD RDAZTECLNPUEBLO DRPUEBLO LN
PONTIAC PLMENDAKOTA DR
WAGON
WHEEL TRL
KEOKUK LN
APACHE LN
D
E
C
O
R
A
H
L
N
CHEYENNE LN
HUBERDRO
C
A
L
A
LN
APACHECTOC ALA
CT
APACHE STCREEK AVE
HOKAH AVE
M
O
H
I
C
A
N
C
TPAGEL RDN
A
V
A
J
O
L
N NASHUALNFOXPLM
O
H
I
C
A
N
L
N
Dakota County, Maxar
Friendly Hills Neighborhood Existing Watermain Type
Date: 11/13/2024
0 410
SCALE IN FEET
Legend
Existing Cast Iron Watermain
Existing Ductile Iron Watermain
Page 89 of 89