2022-12-01 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda Packet- Worksession
Special Meeting Notice
Work Session of the
City of Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission
Thursday, December 1 6:00 pm
Mendota Heights City Hall
1. Call to Order
2. 2023 Commission Work Plan
a. Review Demographics
b. Review Community Engagement Efforts from Commissioners
c. Re-Maneuvering Exercise
d. Practical Visioning Exercise
3. Adjourn
1
________________________ Parks and Recreation Commission Work Session Memo
DATE: December 1, 2022
TO: Chair Klepperich and Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Review Demographics
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
At the work session staff will briefly review the city’s demographics. This presentation was
provided to the commissioners at the September Parks and Recreation Commission meeting,
although a few of the commissioners were not in attendance. Ensuring all commissioners are
aware of the City’s basic demographics is important to understanding who we are as a
community and how best the commission can represent the resident’s needs.
ACTION RECOMMENDED/REQUESTED
The Parks and Recreation Commission should determine how the City’s demographics impact
the City’s park infrastructure and recreational programs now and into the future.
2
City of Mendota Heights
Demographics
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION -SEPTEMBER 13
3
Who are we as a City?
Impact on Parks and Recreation?
4
Current State of Mendota Heights
Parks and Recreation
Strengths
❑Stable Tax Base
❑City Good Will
❑Sustained Commitment to Excellence in Services
❑Existing Partnerships
❑Educated and Motivated Citizens
Weaknesses
❑Lack of Planning Around Funding
❑Insufficient Planning
❑Competing Interests
❑Lack of Indoor Programming Space
❑Lack of Future Park Land
❑Lack of Staff Resources
5
Current State of Mendota Heights
Parks and Recreation
Opportunities
❑Generational Turnover
❑Public Interest in Parks
❑Potential Funding Sources
❑Underutilized Volunteers
❑Bourn Lane Site
❑Additional Resources and Options
❑Regional Partnerships
Threats
❑Neighboring Cities
❑Increasing Costs
6
Total Population in Mendota Heights
❑2020: 11,744
❑2015: 11,172
❑2010: 11,071
❑2000: 11,356
Data: US Census
7
Race
Population of One Race (11,079/11,744)
❑White Alone: 10,420
❑Asian Alone: 261
❑Black or African American Alone: 198
❑Other Race Alone: 164
❑American Indian and Alaska Native Alone: 33
❑Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone: 3
Data: US Census
8
Age
❑Under 18 Years Old=2,466 (21.74795%)
❑18 Years and Older=8,873 (78.25205%)
Data: US Census
9
Age
❑19 and Younger=2828 (24.94%)
❑20-39 Years=1921 (16.94%)
❑40-59 Years=2919 (25.74%)
❑60-79 Years=3133 (27.63%)
❑80 and Older=538 (4.74%)
Data: US Census
10
Age
❑Under 10= 1152 (10.15%)
❑10-19 Years=1676 (14.78%)
❑20-29 Years=749 (6.6%)
❑30-39 Years=1172 (10.33%)
❑40-49 Years=1172 (10.33%)
❑50-59 Years=1747 (15.41%)
❑60-69 Years=1963 (17.31%)
❑70-79 Years=1170 (10.31%)
❑80 and Older=538 (4.74%)
Data: US Census
11
Population Projections-2040
❑2040 Population Projections by Category as Follows:
❑Age 0-5 Years: 4.44% (.03% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 6-12 Years: 6.87% (.57% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 13-15 Years: 2.72% (.52% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 16-17 Years: 2.33% (.41% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 18-24 Years: 6.23% (.55% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 25-34 Years: 7.97% (.54% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 35-44 Years: 10.31% (.53% increase from 2020)
❑Age 45-54 Years: 14.62% (.02% increase from 2020)
❑Age 55-64 Years: 15.49% (2.6% decrease from 2020)
❑Age 65 Years and Up: 29.01% (5.36% increase from 2020)
Data: Metropolitan Council
12
Median Age
❑Median age of Mendota Heights residents is 49.7 years
❑Median Age of Surrounding Cities:
❑Eagan=38.9 years
❑West Saint Paul=38.7 years
❑South Saint Paul=35.9 years
❑Inver Grove Heights=40.1 years
❑Apple Valley=37.8 years
❑Lakeville=36 years
❑Farmington=34.9 years
❑Burnsville=37.1 years
❑Woodbury=37.9 years
Data: US Census
13
Education Attainment
❑High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25+ (2016-2020)=99.4%
❑National average: 88.5%
❑Bachelors degree or higher, percent of persons age 25+ (2016-2020)=62.8%
❑National average: 32.9%
Data: US Census
14
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility
ISD 197
❑Total Students Enrolled: 5,025
❑Free Lunch Eligibility: 1,537 (30.6%)
❑Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility: 425 (8.5%)
State of Minnesota
❑Free Lunch Eligibility: 29%
❑Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility: 8.1%
Data: Minnesota Department of Health
15
Median Household Income
❑1990: $60,514
❑2000: $81,115
❑2010: $92,727
❑2015: $95,353
❑2020: $119,347
❑National average: $64,994
Data: Metropolitan Council
16
Per Capita Income (in past 12 months)
❑2020: $60,562
❑National average: $35,384
❑2015: $59,851
❑2010: $48,813
❑2000: $39,407
Data: Metropolitan Council
17
Percent of Population Below Federal
Poverty Level
❑2020→13.1%
❑Below Poverty Level: 4.2%
❑Between 150%-184%: 4.0%
❑Between 100%=149%: 4.9%
Data: Metropolitan Council
18
2022 Federal Poverty Level
# of Persons
in
Household
2022 Federal Poverty Level for the 48 Contiguous States (Annual Income)
100%133%138%150%200%300%400%
1 $13,590 $18,075 $18,754 $20,385 $27,180 $40,770 $54,360
2 $18,310 $24,352 $25,268 $27,465 $36,620 $54,930 $73,240
3 $23,030 $30,630 $31,781 $34,545 $46,060 $69,090 $92,120
4 $27,750 $36,908 $38,295 $41,625 $55,500 $83,250 $111,000
5 $32,470 $43,185 $44,809 $48,705 $64,940 $97,410 $129,880
6 $37,190 $49,463 $51,322 $55,785 $74,380 $111,570 $148,760
7 $41,910 $55,740 $57,836 $62,865 $83,820 $125,730 $167,640
8 $46,630 $62,018 $64,349 $69,945 $93,260 $139,890 $186,520
Data: Metropolitan Council
19
Average Household Size
❑1990: 2.85
❑2000: 2.72
❑2010: 2.51
❑2020: 2.44
❑2021: 2.43
Data: Metropolitan Council
20
Housing Type
2020:
❑Single Family Detached: 3373
❑Townhomes: 728
❑Duplex, Triplex, Quad: 17
❑Multifamily: 859
Data: Metropolitan Council
21
Homeownership Rate in City
❑1990: 90.7%
❑2000: 92%
❑2010: 88.3%
❑2020: 84.8%
Data: Metropolitan Council
22
Median Housing Value in City
❑1990: $150,300
❑2000: $209,000
❑2010: $343,400
❑2020: $402,600
Data: Metropolitan Council
23
City Land
❑Area: 10.0 Square Miles
❑City: 6,426 Acres
❑Park, Rec, Preserve: 1,042 Acres= 16.22%
❑Number of Parks: 17
Data: Metropolitan Council
24
How do we respond to our
demographics?
25
________________________ Parks and Recreation Commission Work Session Memo
DATE: December 1, 2022
TO: Chair Klepperich and Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Review Community Engagement Efforts from Commissioners
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
At the June Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commissioners approved a plan for
community engagement. Commissioners approved an instruction sheet, discussion tool,
summary sheet, and contact sheet to be used when the commissioners went out into the
community for their assigned meetings.
The following community groups were assigned to commissioners:
• Mendota Heights/West Saint Paul Rotary: Jaffrey
• Mendota Heights Foundation: Bob
• Linden Apartments: Jaffrey
• CDA Building: Patrick
• Mendota Heights Apartments: Amy
• Tennis Users: Amy
• Pickleball Players: Amy
• Dog Park Users: Steph
• MHAA Softball: Amy
• MHAA Soccer: Patrick
• MHAA Football: Patrick
• MHAA Lacrosse: Michelle
• Heritage PTA: Steph
• Somerset PTA: Jaffrey
• Mendota PTA: Michelle
• Friendly Hills PTA: Michelle
• Garlough PTA: Jaffrey
• High School Students: Michelle
• Master Gardeners: Steph
• MOM’s Club (informal group): Dan
• ECFE Groups: Dan
26
The primary goals for engagement included:
• Provide visibility for parks and recreation offerings
• Introduce community members to Commissioners and provide information about the
Commission and its role/relation to the City Council
• Solicit ideas and feedback for new parks and recreation offerings
• Identify common themes and specific requests for improvements that might be a good
discussion topic at future parks and recreation commission meetings
• Provide opportunities for residents to get involved in the community
• Explain the budget constraints in relation to parks and recreation
Commissioners were then asked to provide staff with a summary of their outreach meetings.
The following summaries are attached:
1. PAN Meeting Summary (ISD 197 PTA groups)
2. Rotary Meeting Summary
3. ECFE Survey
4. Mom’s Club Survey
ACTION RECOMMENDED/REQUESTED
The Parks and Recreation Commission should determine how the City’s community
engagement efforts impact the city’s park infrastructure and recreational programs now and
into the future.
27
PAN meeting 10-10-22 – Community Engagement
12 participants, 9 stayed for most of it – 3 from WSP, 6 from Mendota Heights
Reasons for living in MH area:
Sense of community and seeing familiar faces.
More space/large yards, lower taxes, good schools, parks/trails, everything is 15 minutes away in any
direction
Very safe place to live (low crime)
Features at the parks in use:
Trails used by all
Would like to see ways to give feedback for certain features – e.g. ball fields – when you’re there every
day and playing with your kids you notice things or have ideas you wish were in place for shade or porta
potties or other amenities
Would like to see the City consider the clientele that attends things like ball games – grandparents are
often there and may need shade or access to restrooms, more seating, etc.
Additional programming they’d like to see:
With the closure of the Y in WSP, this has left a gap for teens/pre-teens who now have nowhere to go or
nowhere to hang out
“Destination” things don’t exist in MH – no splash pad, mini golf, etc – We need to create something
that draws others to our city…gives them a reason to be here and spend their money here.
There’s nothing for older kids to do once they outgrow playgrounds and if they are not at the skate park
There are just no options for them to do or place to go. Maybe a community center.
Mendakota park is underused and feels like a dead park – Basketball court and volleyball are not used.
The fields aren’t in use as much because the process is difficult to reserve them and she feels the City is
unaccommodating.
Would like to see updated amenities for concessions at Mendakota and more trust from the City when
residents and groups use the facilities (e.g. granting access to the storage room or helping with solutions
for busy tournament days with lots of people) – general feeling that sports and events draw people into
our community and provide business to surrounding restaurants/Walgreens/etc because people are at
the fields or participating in a sport. MH should feel more welcoming, but barriers make it seem like it is
not wanted to have people using facilities.
28
Practical features from other parks/places:
St. Paul Urban Tennis runs a really good tennis program – coaches/teachers for tennis camps do not like
working with the City because they feel micromanaged; noted that tennis instructors do not return year
over year because they don’t like how the City is running the program – might be worth looking into our
retention of coaches/teachers and what we could do to improve if there’s an issue.
Eagan provides a well-structured Track program for youth. Be great if MH could do something similar
Other trails (along a river in Ohio as an example?) have fitness stations or fitness walks where there are
activities (adult equipment) along an existing trail that can help you with strength training, balance,
agility, etc. More of this type of thing could be available to all ages and could be considered at
playgrounds for older adults who take little kids to the park and would like to get some exercise.
Mini Golf
Sand Volleyball courts
More Shade at Playgrounds within parks
What’s your role/how could we make changes:
General feeling that we need to figure out what we can do that isn’t available in other places
Are there partnerships we could expand upon?
Could we explore business partnerships for advertising and financial backing of parks amenities?
Sponsors…?
Could we get time blocked off at indoor spaces for local leagues to play (like the Dome)?
29
Rotary - Community Engagement Download
Rotary Meeting on Oct 5th 2022
18 Attendees
Reasons for living in MH area:
Duration for living in the area varied from 3 years up to 54 years.
Close knit Neighborhood feel.
Proximity to Big City and Airport
larger yards than STP, lower taxes, good schools, parks/trails, everything is 15 minutes away in any
direction
Very safe place to live (low crime).
Great place to raise a family
Features of the parks that they currently or have used:
Fishing at Rogers Lake
Walking and biking the trails
LOVE the Compost pick up at Mendakota
Dog Park
Skate Park
Golf the Par 3
Pickleball courts at Marie
Music in the Park
Fireworks
Block Party
Kids golf program
Additional programming they’d like to see:
Senior Programming – Cards (Bridge, Cribbage, etc)
Pickleball League and Indoor
Aquatic program (Swimming)
30
Guided Hiking at Valley park or Oheyawahi Trail
Cross country skiing
More programming in the Summer for kids. Feel the current programs fill up to soon and they are not
enough to service all the kids.
Practical features from other parks/places:
Playgrounds need more SHADE
Bathrooms at parks
Playground should have a Unique Feature or Theme (Boyd Park, Pirate playground,
Adult playground equipment like at Eagan Comm center
Would like there to be a public map that would show where all of the other parks are in Mendota
Heights
Community Center
Zipline at one of the parks
Indoor Opportunity to play Pickleball
More Sidewalks for walking and biking – would like to see more sidewalks and increased accessibility to
get to the parks. Bike lane or Sidewalk on Dodd
Bike Stations on the trails
Transportation /accessibility (equity)
WELCOME to Mendota Heights Packet (mailer)
Splash Pad
What’s your role/How would you like to get involved:
Adopt a Park
Willing to pay more to have more
Sponsor a Park ‘clean up’
31
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
32
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
33
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
34
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
35
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
36
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
37
Discussion Tool for Parks and Recreation Commission Community Outreach
How long have you lived in Mendota Heights? What is your top reason for living in this community?
What features of Mendota Heights parks do you primarily use (playgrounds, trails, ball fields, other
features)? And is there anything you’d like to see change?
What Mendota Heights recreation programs have you participated in? Are there additional programs or
activities you’d like to see?
Given that we need to be fiscally responsible and funding does have limitations; what practical features
have you observed at other parks that could potentially be incorporated into our Park system.
What do you see as your role in making changes happen in Mendota Heights parks? Is there a specific
way in which you’d like to participate in the future (volunteering, helping to organize community events,
offering suggestions for programming/activities, etc)?
38
________________________ Parks and Recreation Commission Work Session Memo
DATE: December 1, 2022
TO: Chair Klepperich and Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Re-Maneuvering Exercise
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
In June, 2021 the Parks and Recreation Commission participated in 12 hours of strategic planning
with Hue Life, the City’s consultant. At the strategic planning sessions members of the
Commission and City Council discussed goals for the future of Parks and Recreation in Mendota
Heights.
Commissioners will be asked to discuss the recent parks and recreation accomplishments, in-
progress projects, and current barriers and setbacks. Staff will lead commissioners through the
attached exercise to gauge the current status.
Attachments:
•Re-Maneuvering Exercise
•Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan
•Hue Life Documentation from Strategic Planning, 2021
ACTION RECOMMENDED/REQUESTED
The commissioners should prepare for the discussion by reviewing the attached re-
maneuvering exercise.
39
RE-MANEUVERING OF ACTION PLAN
(REFLECTING BACK ON 2021)
Accomplishments
Things that have been completed aka checked off the list
In-Progress
Actively being worked on
Barriers/Setbacks
Things preventing progress aka what has gotten in the way
40
City of Mendota Heights
Parks & Recreation
STRATEGIC PLAN
41
INTRODUCTION/CONTEXT
The City of Mendota Heights offers a robust system of recreational and open space options,
which includes regional trails, lakeside parks, scenic bluffs, and nature preserves. The City’s
facilities provide unique features that shape the character of Mendota Heights beyond the
ordinary. The City’s parks provide a visual identity to the City, in addition to contributing to the
quality of life for those who recreate in the community.
Mendota Heights provides both active and passive recreation areas, along with other state and
private parks. The City’s 33 miles of trails offer an excellent opportunity for exercise and
relaxation. Opportunities for walking, bicycling, bird watching, cross country skiing, golfing and
nature hiking are sprinkled throughout Mendota Heights. The City has 17 public parks
throughout the community, including Oȟéyawahe/Pilot Knob Preservation Site. These parks
contain over 295 acres of land area.
The City’s parks are supplemented by three golf courses: Mendakota Country Club, Somerset
Country Club, and the Mendota Heights Par 3 Community Golf Course. These contribute to open
space views and recreational opportunities for residents.
Throughout the last fifteen years the city has made improvements and developed new parks. It
has also made efforts to maintain existing open space such as purchasing the 17-acre Mendota
Heights Par 3 Golf Course. The City recently joined in partnership with other public entities and
purchased the 25.5-acre Oȟéyawahe/Pilot Knob Preservation Site, which will be retained as
open space. Protection of the Pilot Knob area as an important Dakota site has been identified as
a critical issue for many residents within the City. Oȟéyawahe/Pilot Knob Preservation Site was
placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2017. A task force has been formed to
pursue short and long-term goals for the preservation of and improvements to Historic Pilot
Knob.
In the 1990’s, the majority of park upgrades were made due to a voter approved parks focused
referendum. While the need and interest for recreational opportunities has increased over the
years, the improvement of park equipment and infrastructure has not occurred due to
inconsistent funding and a lack of proactive planning.
Over the last thirty years the way residents recreate has also changed. Recreational interests
have evolved to include new opportunities such as skateboarding, pickleball and cricket. The
City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, and staff must evaluate the current parks
infrastructure and recreation programming along with the proposed recreational and park
improvements from a 21st century lens.
42
GOVERNANCE
The Parks and Recreation Commission is appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the
majority of the members of the City Council and has the following responsibilities:
• Advise the City Council on matters pertaining to parks and recreational development
programs and shall cooperate with city personnel in implementing the parks and
recreation programs
• Advise the City Council on the establishment of written rules and regulations for the
use, management, and operation of public parks and recreation facilities, the same to
be approved by the action of the City Council before being put into effect
• If requested by the City Council, prepare plans for the acquisition, development and
improvement of the City public parks and recreational facilities and shall, if requested by
the City Council, develop a comprehensive plan for future park development and open
space
• If requested by the City Council, prepare a capital improvements program for the
purpose of determining priorities and apportioning costs of scheduled improvements
• In performing the aforementioned duties and responsibilities, exhibit the initiative in
formulating policies which will be responsive to the anticipated needs and objectives of
the community.
The City Council reviews the recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Commission to
approve the annual budget, finalize the scope of park improvement projects, institute policies,
establish fees, and address long-term planning in regards to prioritizing initiatives.
43
STRATEGIC PLAN PURPOSE/PROCESS
To start the discussion regarding the future of Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation, Parks and
Recreation Commissioners and City Councilmembers along with key staff underwent strategic
planning sessions to discuss the current conditions and desired future of the park system and
programming. This process articulated the needs and wants of residents and how that is
different from the facilities and programs that are currently offered within the City. The
resulting strategic plan includes information and data from following areas:
• Inventory of Existing Park Amenities
• National Metric Comparison Research to Current Facilities (in progress)
• Community Engagement Results to Determine Needs
• Discussions Surrounding Future Goals of Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
• Policy Direction and Implementation Planning
The plan serves as a road map to how and where park and recreational improvements should be
developed in both the immediate future and in the long-term.
Mendota Heights Vision Statement:
Mendota Heights will be recognized as a high quality, family-
oriented residential community, with a spacious natural feel
and the amenities of a city.
Mendota Height Mission Statement:
Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of life in
Mendota Heights by providing quality public safety,
infrastructure, and planning for orderly and sustainable growth.
44
CURRENT STATE OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARKS AND RECREATION
STRENGTHS
1. Stable Tax Base
The City of Mendota Heights is comprised of a strong tax base consisting of
formidable income and economic activity within the City. Mendota Heights
features high median property values and incomes, which provide strong financial
support for City goals, initiatives and projects. The City also boasts a AAA bond
rating, which reflects the City’s financial strength and stability.
2. City Good Will
The City has established strong relationships with residents which has resulted in
trust and respect between elected and appointed officials, staff, and the
community. By properly engaging stakeholders, the City has established
connections to discuss wants/needs and next steps moving forward. Relationships
with residents are imperative to ensure a successful Park and Recreation operation
into the future.
3. Sustained Commitment to Excellence of Services
The City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission holds staff to a high
standard in regards to programming, park planning, community building and
engagement. Staff works to implement best practices in their work and deliver
process improvement and policy changes to best serve the residents of Mendota
Heights.
4. Existing Partnerships
The City of Mendota Heights values its positive working relationships with the
Cities of West Saint Paul, South Saint Paul, Inver Grove Heights, and ISD 197. These
existing partnerships enable large scale programs and events that would be
difficult to host singularly. By working together each city’s budget is stretched
further and human capital is shared. Discussions regarding current and future
partnership opportunities are ongoing and staff is working to form partnerships
with other local organizations for optimized opportunities for our residents.
5. Educated and Motivated Citizens
The residents of Mendota Heights care about their community and are passionate
about their park system. Garnering community engagement is important as
residents and stakeholders ask educated and intellectual questions surrounding
programming and park planning. The Mendota Heights community wants to be
involved in providing high quality programming and facilities within the City.
45
WEAKNESSES
1. Lack of Planning Around Funding
Many of the City’s amenities and facilities within the Park System have not been
replaced or updated since a Park referendum in the late 1980’s. Adequate
funding for the upkeep and maintenance of exiting infrastructure has not been
budgeted for or properly planned. The Special Parks Fund has restrictions for use
and with a lack of land for development, future funding from this revenue source
will not be reliable.
2. Insufficient Planning
Proactive park improvement project planning has not been a priority. A rolling
Capital Improvement Plan has not been regularly reviewed in order to properly
schedule projects and ensure funding is available. Moving forward, dedicated
staff to supervise this process as well as regular review of the process/strategic
plan is necessary to ensure proactive forethought is developed.
3. Competing Interests
The Mendota Heights community consists of passionate individuals surrounding
recreational opportunities. This results in differing priorities for park
improvement projects and programming. Prioritizing park project requests, field
and facility usage, and the utilization of funding available has been challenging.
4. Lack of Indoor Programming Space
The City lacks indoor gathering space to hold differing and unique programming
opportunities. Currently, all indoor programs are conducted in partnership with
the City of West Saint Paul. In the future, West Saint Paul’s programming may
increase and there may not be an opportunity for partnership. This could restrict
the type and number of programming Mendota Heights can offer in the future
unless ample indoor space is added in the City for programming.
5. Lack of Future Park Land
The City of Mendota Heights is 95% built out, resulting in a lack of new
recreational park land for development. The redesigning of existing park spaces
will be crucial in providing modern and contemporary park amenities. With a lack
of land, properly prioritizing projects will be imperative to providing an equitable
park system.
6. Lack of Staff Resources
The current Mendota Heights organizational structure provides one dedicated
administrative employee working on parks planning and recreational program
organization. With the current staffing model, being proactive on park projects
and increasing recreational offerings is difficult to achieve.
46
OPPORTUNITIES
1. Generational Turnover
The demographics of Mendota Heights have changed since the 1989 parks
referendum. The median age of Mendota Heights residents is 51.2 years, which is
considerably higher than surrounding cities.
Median Age of Surrounding Cities:
• Eagan: 38.2 years
• West Saint Paul: 37.3 years
• South Saint Paul: 35.1 years
• Inver Grove Heights: 39.7 years
• Apple Valley: 38.2 years
• Saint Paul: 33 years
• Lakeville: 36.6 years
• Farmington: 33.7 years
• Burnsville: 36.8 years
Mendota Heights’ 2020 population by age category are as follows:
• Age 0-5 Years: 4.47%
• Age 6-12 Years: 7.44%
• Age 13-15 Years: 3.24%
• Age 16-17 Years: 2.74%
• Age 18-24 Years: 6.78%
• Age 25-34 Years: 8.33%
• Age 35-44 Years: 10.84%
• Age 45-54 Years: 14.42%
• Age 55-64 Years: 18.09%
• Age 65 Years and Up: 23.65%
Mendota Heights’ 2030 population projections by age category are as follows:
• Age 0-5 Years: 4.43% (.04% decrease from 2020)
• Age 6-12 Years: 6.97% (.47% decrease from 2020)
• Age 13-15 Years: 2.84% (.4% decrease from 2020)
• Age 16-17 Years: 2.51% (.23% decrease from 2020)
• Age 18-24 Years: 6.58% (.2% decrease from 2020)
• Age 25-34 Years: 7.78% (.55% decrease from 2020)
• Age 35-44 Years: 11% (.16% increase from 2020)
• Age 45-54 Years: 14.43% (.01% increase from 2020)
• Age 55-64 Years: 14.61% (3.48% decrease from 2020)
• Age 65 Years and Up: 28.84% (5.19% increase from 2020)
Mendota Heights’ 2040 population projections by age category are as follows:
• Age 0-5 Years: 4.44% (.03% decrease from 2020)
• Age 6-12 Years: 6.87% (.57% decrease from 2020)
• Age 13-15 Years: 2.72% (.52% decrease from 2020)
47
• Age 16-17 Years: 2.33% (.41% decrease from 2020)
• Age 18-24 Years: 6.23% (.55% decrease from 2020)
• Age 25-34 Years: 7.97% (.54% decrease from 2020)
• Age 35-44 Years: 10.31% (.53% increase from 2020)
• Age 45-54 Years: 14.62% (.02% increase from 2020)
• Age 55-64 Years: 15.49% (2.6% decrease from 2020)
• Age 65 Years and Up: 29.01% (5.36% increase from 2020)
Source-Metropolitan Council: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metc-
trans-anlys-zones-offical-curent
With these changing demographics the City must offer programs and provide
facilities that enable adults and senior citizens to be active. Equity within a park
system is imperative to ensure all residents have equal opportunities to recreate
near their home. Engaging the senior population will be important in order to
better understand our community’s wants and needs.
2. Public Interest in Parks
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mendota Heights park system saw
record setting usage. Parks became one of the only places people could visit when
restaurants, stores, and entertainment venues were forced to close. Our park
system was recognized as an essential resource for the physical and mental health
of residents. This realization sparked an interest from residents to determine how
parks could be improved and better utilized moving forward.
3. Potential Funding Sources
The City of Mendota Heights has been approached by residents and groups
wanting to financially provide support for ongoing improvements in the parks.
Finding proper channels and processes to receive these donations will be
important to successfully upgrading the park system. Opportunities regarding
grants are also available. Staff time needs to be allocated to this function.
4. Underutilized Volunteers
The City has many talented and passionate residents who want to give back to
their community. Currently, the City of Mendota Heights lacks a formalized
volunteer program. The need for a formal volunteer program to solicit volunteers,
ensure proper backgrounding, provide work direction, and track hours in order to
provide recognition is necessary.
5. Bourn Lane Site
The City has one remaining parcel of land in the Southwest portion of the City
that the City Council will need to advise staff in the future of how they want that
land utilized. This 14.75 acre parcel is being considered for park usage, in addition
to being considered for other uses within the City.
48
6. Additional Resources and Options
With an additional Parks and Recreation staff planned in FY2022, Mendota
Heights can expand opportunities in regards to programming and infrastructure
improvements. Discussion and decisions regarding funding allocation in future
years will also be important to determine the need for better communication,
extensive maintenance, and other public services to the community.
7. Regional Partnerships
Mendota Heights has many local businesses, non-profits, and neighboring
governmental organizations that provide opportunities for joint programming and
partnership on facilities. Each neighboring jurisdiction providing unique amenities
enable the community many recreational options in close proximity. Duplication
of unique amenities is not necessary, if proper planning is developed.
THREATS
1. Neighboring Cities
Neighboring cities to Mendota Heights currently have more facilities and better
indoor space for programming and rentals. The reality is larger cities typically
have larger budgets, which results in larger and more diverse facilities. As a
smaller City this is something that will need to be understood and accepted by
the community.
2. Increasing Costs
With the reality of the economy, the cost of services, goods, and equipment is
going to continue to rise. This is something that will need to be considered when
discussing new capital projects, as well as budgeting the cost to maintain existing
infrastructure.
49
FUTURE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARKS AND
RECREATION
In the next five years the following will be accomplished based on the desires of the City Council,
Parks and Recreation Commission, and staff.
Guiding Principles explain the vision of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation and provide
the basis for goals, actions, and outcomes.
Goals provide desired results that are planned and committed to.
Action Items provide the steps necessary for staff, commissioners, and councilmembers to
complete in order to achieve the stated goals and guiding principles.
Outcomes state the end result of completing the action items.
Guiding Principle:
Sustained Funding for Parks and Recreation
Goal: Secure Sustainable Funding for Projects
Action Items:
Staff will provide the City Council with funding options to ensure there is financing for
future park improvements and recreational programming for future generations.
Policy recommendations regarding field and facility naming rights for donations as well
as identifying corporate partners will be provided to the City Council.
A relationship with the Mendota Heights Community Foundation will be formed to
enable private donation opportunities for residents who want to financially support
park and recreation opportunities.
Staff will research grant opportunities available for projects included in the City’s Capital
Improvement Plan and will work with the City Council to submit applications.
The City Council will discuss the conversion of the Par 3 bond payments into a park
improvement levy starting in 2023.
A referendum will be researched and information provided to the City Council in order
for an educated decision to be made on next steps moving forward.
Outcome:
Long term Parks and Recreation dedicated finances will be identified and will be utilized to
fund projects under the parks Capital Improvement Plan. The Capital Improvement Plan will
be well developed to ensure projects are following the recommended useful life timeframe
50
outlined in the Asset Management Plan, while ensuring all parks have adequate funding to
ensure equity within the City. The City will have developed and maintained strong
public/private partnerships within the Community to provide optimal recreational
opportunities to our residents at a reasonable taxing rate.
Guiding Principle:
A Leading Community Agency
Goal: Mendota Heights is a Model Organization
Action Items:
Staff will provide the City Council with recommended policy changes in regards to the
allocation of fields and facilities reservations, special events, donations, etc.
Staff will form a successful volunteer program that helps to provide more human capital
within community initiatives.
Staff will work with the City Council to follow the organizational recommendations and
standards of the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Commission of
Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) program in order to provide
continued high-level services to the residents of Mendota Heights
Mendota Heights staff will chair a group consisting of neighboring cities to discuss
projects to ensure duplication does not occur, opportunities for partnerships on
programming and facilities, and to provide a basis for policy recommendations.
City staff will submit initiatives to be considered for the Minnesota Recreation Park
Association (MRPA) awards of excellence, which are awarded to Cities that have
outstanding achievements in the following categories: administrative or management
strategies, marketing and communications, park and facility projects, programming and
events, sponsorships and partnerships, and volunteer initiatives.
Outcome:
City Staff will work closely with the City Council to make strategic decisions that ensure the
City is a recognized leader throughout the industry on best practices. This will include being
innovative and creative in regards to constructing new amenities, implementing new and
emerging trends nationwide, and developing policies to ensure equitable practices.
Mendota Heights will be a recognized leader in the Park and Recreation field in Minnesota
51
Guiding Principle:
Greater Connection to the Natural Environment
Goal: Manage Park Natural Resources
Action Items:
A Natural Resource Commission will be established to provide the City Council with
recommendations on sustainability, environmental stewardship, and preserving
natural habitats. Recommendations will be made on policies and initiatives that
enhance and preserve the environment and natural resources within the
community.
Staff will determine locations that grass areas can be converted to no-mow areas to
provide more native spaces within the park system and community as a whole.
Joint meetings between the Parks and Recreation Commission and Natural Resource
Commission will provide opportunities for the two advisory commissions to ensure
they are working together for the betterment of Mendota Heights parks.
Opportunities for nature-based recreation and nature play areas will be researched.
Outcome:
Through partnership with the Natural Resource Commission and Natural Resource staff
our parks will provide a clean and safe space with natural areas. Passive recreation areas
will be reviewed and prioritized for refurbishment to ensure residents have easy access
to nature play locations and programming.
*A Natural Resource Management plan is being written. Many natural resource initiatives within
parks will be included in the Natural Resource Management Plan. Those policies and practices
were not included in this plan to reduce duplication and to hone in on priorities. *
* The City Council will continue to work with the Oȟéyawahe/Historic Pilot Knob Task Force to
protect and preserve the natural space and sacred history the space provides.
Oȟéyawahe/Historic Pilot Knob Task Force initiatives were not included in this plan, as their own
future planning is developed in a separate document. *
52
Guiding Principle:
A Safe, Connected, Walkable and Bikeable Community
Goal: Improve Trail Connectivity
Action Items:
A bike and pedestrian plan will be completed to determine gaps within our trail system.
Staff will work with the City Council to address these gap locations and provide plans for
improvement.
Staff will work with the City Council to rehabilitate existing low-quality trails to improve
connectivity.
Staff will continue to advocate for residents by encouraging partners to add sidewalks
on state and county roads.
Encourage the prioritization of safety when making decisions regarding trail
connectivity.
Outcome:
With renovated trails residents will be encouraged to walk to parks, shopping areas, and
other local destinations. Residents within Mendota Heights will have the ability to safely
bike and walk within the community. This work will proactively provide better neighborhood
connectivity to bring the community together for social interaction and morale building. The
overall safety of Mendota Heights residents will be greatly improved by this initiative.
53
Guiding Principle:
Vibrant and Diverse Community Programming
Goal: Expanded Programming
Action Items:
Staff will provide the City Council with a yearly calendar of programming ideas
during budget development to determine the necessary costs needed for execution.
Staff will increase the amount of community events.
Outcome:
The City will organize programming for residents that provide opportunities for all
residents regardless of age, race, ethnicity, income and skills to participate. New,
innovative program offerings will be provided in addition to the regular offerings
currently provided. Staff will work to collaborate as much as possible with neighboring
cities in order to minimize costs and staff needs.
Guiding Principle:
Recreational Facilities for All Ages
Goal: Prioritize Projects and Initiatives
Action Items:
A rolling Capital Improvement Plan will be reviewed bi-annually and updated by
staff, the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council. This list will be formed
utilizing the Asset Management Plan in relation to useful life, community needs
based on resident engagement, and national trend research and comparisons.
If directed by the City Council, staff will explore the utilization of the Bourn Lane site
for recreational use in the form of a Master Plan/Concept Plan to determine if the
proposed recreational space is the correct use for the community.
The City will look for opportunities to form local partnerships that ensure our
community is involved in and has access to regional facilities.
Staff will regularly compare our park amenities to the national park delivery
standards for cities our size.
Engagement with the residents, stakeholders and user groups will be conducted to
get feedback on features, amenities, and layouts desired in new facilities.
54
Outcome:
The City will have a roadmap for the next five years on plans to properly provide safe
and equitable recreational facilities for residents. With a defined process for reviewing
capital improvement project requests, astute financial planning will work hand in hand
with our Capital Improvement Plan and Asset Management Plan to ensure an organized
process moving forward.
Guiding Principle:
Effective Two-Way Communication with
an Informed Community
Goal: Know the Community
Action Items:
Staff will continue to find creative ways to provide the community with information
surrounding Parks and Recreation. A survey will be conducted to determine what
are the best forms of communication for our community.
In collaboration with other city departments (Police and Fire) our staff will be
present in the community and form relationships to better understand the wants
and needs of our residents.
Listening sessions will be conducted regularly with groups of the community by the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
A new website will be completed and launched with better Parks and Recreation
information easily accessible to residents.
Outcome:
By better understanding our community, decisions surrounding park improvement
projects and programming will be made to best serve the Mendota Heights community.
Information will be more readily available to residents and new information and
updates will be better communicated to reach as many residents as possible within
reason.
55
Guiding Principle:
Human Capital
Goal: Attract and Retain Qualified Employees and Volunteers
Action Items:
Add a Parks and Recreation Manager to the City’s organizational structure to
manage park improvement projects and planning and lead golf course operations in
collaboration with the Recreation Program Coordinator (1 FTE) and an Office
Support Assistant (.5 FTE-Park and Recreation Time Allocation).
Establish a City volunteer program where volunteers can help on projects and at
special events. A formal policy for volunteering will be written and presented to the
City Council.
Bring recommended updates to the seasonal pay matrix to recruit and retain
qualified staff for programming, park maintenance, and Par 3 operations.
Provide training and education for park and recreation employees to ensure a
qualified and engaged team of employees is developed.
Conduct a yearly review of staffing to determine if adequate resources are available
to implement the priorities of the strategic plan by the City Council.
Outcome:
By properly utilizing volunteers and empowering staff to think outside past practices,
the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Department will consist of high-quality
employees dedicated to serving the residents of Mendota Heights and surrounding
communities.
56
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Our Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) are a set of quantifiable measurements that will be used
to determine the Park and Recreation staff’s achievement of the City Council approved Strategic
Plan. These KPI’s will be tracked throughout the year and provided in the annual report.
Quarterly updates will be provided to the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission to
ensure organized execution. Each year these will be compared to previous years to determine
resources and direction needed from the City Council for the upcoming year.
1. Number of Recreation Program/Event Participants
2. Number of Special Events Planned and Held
3. Amount of No Mow Areas Utilized in Parks
4. Number of Volunteers Processed and Approved to Volunteer
5. Number of Volunteer Hours Utilized
6. Hours of Fields, Facilities and Picnic Shelters Allocated
7. Number of Capital Projects Completed on Time and on Budget
8. Number of Partnership Projects Initiated
9. Number of Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA)
Standards Completed
10. Number of Listening Sessions Completed
11. Number of Grants Applied to and Received
12. Amount of Grant Funding Received
APPENDIX
A. 2040 Comprehensive Plan
B. Asset Management Plan
C. Capital Improvement Plan
D. Current Planning Calendar
57
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS: PARKS AND RECREATION
STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT
What needs to happen in the next 3-5 years for Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
to be financially sustainable and engaging, while encompassing the needs and wants
of all residents?
58
Sustained Funding From All
Sources
Spacious and Gracious Facilities and Programming
For All
Communication
Sustainable
source of
funding for
Parks and Rec
A leading
community with
invested
partners
Greater
connection to
the natural
environment
A safe,
connected,
walkable and
bikeable
community
Vibrant and
diverse
community
programming
Active
recreational
facilities for all
ages
Effective 2-way
communication
with an informed
community
Long term P&R
dedicated finances
Be recognized for
best park and rec
prac�ces
Park of larger
community
(regional)
Public/private
partnerships (and
inter-agency)
Clean and safe
environment
Natural pollinators in
full bloom
Historic Pilot Knob
Interpre�ve Center
New/ replacement
fishing pier
Rehab trails improve
connec�vity (new
trails)
Trails for
neighborhood
connec�vity
People walking to
the park
Sidewalks on
state/county roads
All can bike/walk
safely to retail
Weekly summer
evening concert
series
Concert/
Entertainment series
in park
Art in the park
Iconic winter fes�val
Community dog
show
U�lize Par 3 bocce
outside cards/board
games inside
Teen and pre-teen
ac�vi�es and
programming
Golf! Golf! Golf!
Farmers Market
Community Center
(sr area/ teen center)
Sr Ci�zen
programming
Regional Sports
Complex (Bourne)
Outdoor Sports
Complex
Community Center
Bourne property rec
fields plus ice ska�ng
trail
Lights at one park
fall/spring sports
All ages community
space
A new regional park at
Diamond Jim’s (Dakota
Cty/ Partnership)
New, expanded, well
landscaped skate park
Updated and improved
fields
Accessible playgrounds
(disabili�es)
Communica�on that
engages the community
PRACTICAL VISION
What do we want to see in place in 3-5 years as a result of our actions?
59
BLOCKS WORKSHOP
Key Focus Area: Sustained Funding From All Sources
Includes vision elements:
- A leading community with invested partners
- Sustainable source of funding for Parks and Rec
What are the possible reasons this is not
happening for us right now?
- Unclear funding sources
- Uncoordinated outreach
What issues are we experiencing that
keep us stuck?
- Compe�ng interests- internal and external
- Changing the funding structure
What is preven�ng or blocking us from
achieving this today?
- Poli�cal will
- Unavailable resources
- Compe�ng interests-internal
What is going well for us in this area?
- Stable tax base
- Special park fund management
- City good will
What opportuni�es are presen�ng
itself?
- Genera�onal turnover
- Public interest in parks
- Poten�al other sources
What are the risks to consider if/when
we are successful?
- Property values increase
- Maintenance costs
- What about everything else?
60
Key Focus Area: Spacious and Gracious
Includes vision elements:
- A safe, connected, walkable and bikeable community
- Greater connec�on to the natural environment
What are the possible reasons this is not
happening for us right now?
- Communica�on
- Commitment to resources, money, staff
What issues are we experiencing that
keep us stuck?
- Deferred Maint
- Lack of space
What is preven�ng or blocking us from
achieving this today?
- Under u�lized residents/volunteers
- Lack of priori�zed plan
- Lack of resources
What is going well for us in this area? - Recent hires
- Historical planning
- Sustained commitment to excellence of services
What opportuni�es are presen�ng
itself?
- Bourn site/OHEYAWAHE
- Dakota County trails greenways
What are the risks to consider if/when
we are successful?
- Complacency
- Extra wear and tear
- Safety/overuse
61
Key Focus Area: Communica�on
Includes vision elements:
- Effec�ve 2-way communica�on with an informed community
What are the possible reasons this is not
happening for us right now?
- Informa�on overload
- Timeliness of informa�on
- Communica�on channels/sources
What issues are we experiencing that
keep us stuck?
- Medium selec�on-how do people want informa�on?
- City calendar-other partner calendars (i.e. MHAA field use)
What is preven�ng or blocking us from
achieving this today?
- So�ware limita�ons
What is going well for us in this area? - Heights Highlights, Friday News-2500 sub
- Outreach opportuni�es and engagement
e.g. listening sessions
What opportuni�es are presen�ng
itself?
- Text messaging
- Expanded social media
- New so�ware-website development
What are the risks to consider if/when
we are successful?
- Unsubscribe- informa�on overload
62
Key Focus Area: Facili�es and Programming For All
Includes vision elements:
- Vibrant and diverse community programming
- Ac�ve recrea�onal facili�es for all ages
What are the possible reasons this is not
happening for us right now?
- Restricted space
- Poli�cal will to make difficult decisions
What issues are we experiencing that
keep us stuck?
- Conflic�ng interests
- Narrow scope of funding sources
- Reluctance to change
- Historical preserva�on- always the same way
What is preven�ng or blocking us from
achieving this today?
- Absence of resources
What is going well for us in this area?
- Good ideas- many of which have come from our
engagement with community
- We do an awesome job with what they have
- Meredith!!!
- Exis�ng partnerships work well
- Good planning in the past
- 95% voter turnout
- Well educated and mo�vated ci�zens
What opportuni�es are presen�ng
itself?
- Explore op�ons to expand resources
- Renewed interest in the city parks
What are the risks to consider if/when
we are successful?
- Increase in golf course interest
63
Manage Park Natural
Resources
Secure Project Specific
Funding
Priori�ze List Establish Predictable
Sustainable Funding
• Convert grass (mow) to na�ve grass
• Establish a natural resource
advisory comm. (implement cc
priority)
• Create a natural resource
commission
• Natural resources- plant pollinator
in parks
• Naming rights for dona�ons
• Mendota Heights Founda�on for
special projects like music in parks
• Iden�fy funding sources/
community corporate
• Take natural resource to capital
• Apply for a grant for new R. Lake
fish pier
• Partner with Dakota County on
projects
• Develop project list
• Rolling CIP plan
• Priori�ze improvements (CIP)
• Create priori�zed list of what’s
funded by tax increase/referendum
• Explore purchase of
community/regional park space (w/
neighbors)
• Establish project “possibility” list to
know ideas
• Make the easier trail connec�ons
happen
• Weekly events and ac�vi�es e.g.
walks-n-talks
• Referendum-research and create
building blocks
• Sustain funding- Par 3 bond
con�nue as dedicated parks money
• Ins�tute franchise fees
• More support for the MH
founda�on (former Mayor K)
• Carry Par 3 levy forward
• Switch Par 3 purchase levy to
general levy
• Stop cu�ng user fees
Improve Informa�on Delivery Engage Community To Create
Buy-In
Create Sense Of Community Know Our Community
• Update parks trail map for gaps
• Communica�on-hire so�ware
consultant – solve problem
• Heights Highlights bi-monthly
• SMS reminders
• Invest in beter park and trail maps
• Update www mobile capacity park
info
• New website
• Community survey on tax increases
(property)
• Go to voters- explain
needs/wants/whys
• Proac�ve community
outreach/communica�ons
• Priori�ze and implement expanded
programming offerings
• Define community events- winter
fes�val, summer concerts
• Community bike rides
• Expand outreach (social outreach to
underserved) partner in services
and opportuni�es
• Equity study- iden�fy who is
underserved by P&R
• Beter understand and forecast the
demographics in MH linked to parks
needs
Increase Human Capital
• Hire addi�onal staff, i.e-write
grants, 60+ programs, maintenance,
etc.
• Form volunteer program
Atrac�ng And
Retaining
Qualified
Employees And
Volunteers
Building A
Connected
Community
Priori�zing Needs,
Securing Funding,
And Execu�ng
The Plan
STRATEGIC
DIRECTIONS
64
Implementation Workshop
Strategic Direc�on: Priori�zing Needs, Securing Funding, And Execu�ng The Plan
Current Reality First-Year Accomplishments 2-Year Success
• Insufficient funding
• No comprehensive parks CIP
• No natural resources commission
• Commit to alloca�ng Par 3 expiring funding to parks
and rec
• Research referendum
• Form rela�onship with Mendota Heights Founda�on
• Priori�zing wants and needs
• Establish natural resources commission
• Sufficient and sustainable parks funding
• One comprehensive parks CIP
• Func�oning natural resources commission
Strategic Direc�on: Building A Connected Community
Current Reality First-Year Accomplishments 2-Year Success
• No bike trail plan
• Outdated website
• Limited programming
• Lack of community engagement
• Need to iden�fy demographics
• Plan ini�ated with consultant
• Secure funding and hire contractor
• Develop calendar of events and funding
• Establish list for mee�ngs
• Obtain data and start analyzing
• Have bike trail plan
• Responsive website
• Host 2 community events per month
• Monthly commissioner, staff, council listening
sessions
• Use data to provide decision making framework
Strategic Direc�on: Atrac�ng And Retaining Qualified Employees And Volunteers
Current Reality First-Year Accomplishments 2-Year Success
Staff:
• Program Staff
• StaffProgram
• “able and stable” could be impacted by re�rement
and space need
Volunteers:
• Girl Scouts
• Great River Greening
• Moms Club
• Undefined opportuni�es leading to under u�lized
volunteers
• No “onboarding” process for volunteers
• Natural resources
• By April 30, 2022, establish a volunteer program
including an applica�on, onboarding
elements/documents and …
• Add staff to address addi�onal programming need/
wants
Staff:
• Increase # of staff in response to projects/ programs
• Increase # of hours for communica�ons
• Increase staffing for recrea�on programming
Volunteers:
• Establish a sustainable, organized volunteer program-
i.e. adopt a park etc.
• Establish onboarding process for volunteers i.e
background check
• “Best prac�ce city”
65
STRATEGIC PLANNING CALENDAR 2021-2022
Priori�zing Needs, Securing Funding, and Execu�ng the Plan Building a Connected Community Atrac�ng and Retaining Qualified Employees and Volunteers
What Who When
2021 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Beyond Update
Rela�onship w/Mendota
Heights Founda�on
City Administrator,
Parks and Recrea�on
Manager
The Founda�on presented to the City Council on January 18. A link of the mee�ng
presenta�on was provided to commissioners in order to beter understand the
Founda�on’s mission, vision, and goals.
Establish Natural Resources
Commission
Public Works Director,
Natural Resource
Coordinator
The City Council appointed the members of the Natural Resource Commission on
April 19. The Commission is up and running and is meeting monthly. A joint work
session will likely be scheduled in early 2023.
Priori�ze wants and needs Parks and Recrea�on
Manager,
Commissioners, City
Council
Joint work session was conducted on February 17 to review the strategic plan and
priori�ze wants and needs. Another work session took place on April 25 to review
the Park Improvement Project List. At the June mee�ng the PRC made a 2023
budget recommenda�on to the Council based on the commission’s priori�es.
Research Parks Referendum City Administrator,
Parks and Recrea�on
Manager
Staff is working to research details for a park referendum. Staff is scheduling
mee�ngs with ci�es that have conducted recent referendums for park
improvement projects. City Council will need to determine if this is moved
forward.
Commit to alloca�ng Par 3
expiring funding to Parks and
Rec
City Council The City Council has allocated funds for park projects in the 2023 Preliminary
Budget based on the Commission’s project priori�es.
Community engagement list
of mee�ngs
Parks and Recrea�on
Manager,
Commissioners
The Commission conducted community engagement sessions with local
stakeholders over the last six months. Results will be discussed when determining
the 2023 Commission Work Plan.
Bike and pedestrian plan
ini�ated with consultant
Public Works Director The Bike and Pedestrian Plan was presented to the City Council on November 1.
Website remodel-secure
funding, hire contractor
Assistant City
Administrator
The City Council approved a contract on July 11 with CivicPlus to construct the
City’s new website. Staff is working on project implementa�on. The website is
proposed to launch in January, 2023.
Demographics-obtain data
and start analyzing
Parks and Recrea�on
Manager
A general demographics presenta�on of the City of Mendota Heights was
presented at the September mee�ng.
Programming-develop
calendar of events and
funding
Recrea�on Program
Coordinator
Funding was approved in the 2022 budget along with addi�onal staff to carry out
this ini�a�ve. New events and programming have been added for 2022. Staff will
provide a 2023 schedule of events at the December mee�ng.
Establish volunteer program Assistant City
Administrator
The City Council approved a volunteer program on April 19. The City has
successfully onboarded 28 volunteers as of October 5, 2022.
Add staff to address
addi�onal programming
needs/wants
City Administrator The City Council approved the hiring of a new Recrea�on Program Coordinator on
April 5. The new employee began employment with the City on April 18.
66
________________________ Parks and Recreation Commission Work Session Memo
DATE: December 1, 2022
TO: Chair Klepperich and Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Manager
SUBJECT: Practical Visioning Exercise
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
At the work session, the commissioners will take part in a practical visioning exercise, similar to
what was conducted at the 2021 strategic planning sessions.
Commissioners will provide goals for the next three to five years in the following categories:
1. Sustainable source of funding for Parks and Recreation
2. A leading community with invested partners
3. Greater connection to the natural environment
4. A safe, connected, walkable and bikeable community
5. Vibrant and diverse community programming
6. Active recreational facilities for all ages
7. Effective two-way communication with an informed community
ACTION RECOMMENDED/REQUESTED
In preparation for the work session, the commissioners should brainstorm five goals in terms of
the practical vision (What do we want to see in place in the next three to five years as a result
of our actions?)
67