2022-11-01 City Council Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
November 1, 2022
6:00 pm
Mendota Heights City Hall
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3.Pledge of Allegiance
4.Adopt Agenda
5.Consent Agenda
a.Approval of October 18, 2022 City Council Minutes
b.Approval of October 18, 2022 City Council Work Session Minutes
c.Acknowledge the September 13, 2022 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
d.Acknowledge the August 23, 2022 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
e.Approve Summary of the City Administrator’s Annual Performance Evaluation
f.Approval of Training Assistant Appointment with the Mendota Heights Fire Department
g.Resolution 2022-81 Accepting Parks and Recreation Donation
h.Approve 2022-2023 Insurance Renewal and Elect to Not Waive Statutory Limits
i.Approve Purchase of Radar Feedback Speed Limit Signs
j.Authorize Vacation of Private Watermain Agreement for Mendota Plaza Expansion
k.Resolution 2022-83 Accepting Project and Approving Final Payment for the Ridge Place
Sanitary Sewer and Streambank Repairs
l.Resolution 2022-84 Approving the Re-execution of the Joint Powers Agreement
Establishing a Watershed Management Organization for the Lower Mississippi River
Watershed
m.Approve Massage Therapist License
n.Approval of September 2022 Treasurer’s Report
o.Approval of Claims List
6.Citizen Comment Period (for items not on the agenda)
*See guidelines below
7.Presentations
a.City-Wide Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan
8.Public Hearing
9. New and Unfinished Business
a. Resolution 2022-82 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Commercial Recreation Use
(Twin City Racquet & Squash Club) in the I-Industrial District - located at 1415 Mendota
Heights Road
10. Community Announcements
11. Council Comments
12. Adjourn
Guidelines for Public Comment Period: The Public Comment Period of the agenda provides
an opportunity to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. All are welcome
to speak.
Comments should be directed to the Council. Comments will be limited to 3 minutes per
person; presentations which are longer will need to be scheduled with the City Clerk to appear
on a future City Council agenda.
Public comments may not be used to air personal attacks, to make political endorsements, or
for political campaign purposes. Council members will not enter into a dialogue, nor will any
decisions be made at that presentation.
Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. If appropriate, the Mayor may
assign staff for follow up to the issues raised or occasionally called on to respond.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights,
Minnesota was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Duggan, Paper, and Mazzitello were
also present. Councilor Miller was absent.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda.
Councilor Duggan seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Levine presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval.
Councilor Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar as presented.
a.Approval of October 6, 2022 City Council Minutes
b. Acknowledge September 14, 2022 Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes
c.Acknowledge September 14, 2022 Natural Resources Commission Work Session Minutes
d. Approve Purchase of Snow Plow Blade for Skid Steer
e.Resolution 2022-77 Accepting AAA Traffic Safety Grant
f.Acknowledge August 2022 Par 3 Financial Report
g. Approval of September 2022 Building Activity Report
h. Approval of Claims List
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 1 of 238 5a
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 2 of 7
Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, commented that the previous week he was made aware of adoption of
a resolution that has been circulated over the past year by the League of Minnesota Cities related to
proposed House Bill 3256. He explained that the Bill encourages density, reduces open space, mandates
that duplexes and accessory dwelling units be allowed in single-family areas, and limits the ability of the
City to implement design and other building requirements. He expressed concern that this could limit the
typical requirements and functions of municipalities. He noted that many metro cities have adopted the
resolution and hoped that the Council would refer this matter to the Planning Commission so that a
recommendation could be made to the Council to oppose the bill.
PRESENTATIONS
A) RESOLUTION 2022-78 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $2,030,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2022A, PLEDGING FOR THE
SECURITY THEREOF, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE
PAYMENT THEREOF
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker introduced the case and the representative from Ehlers and
Associates.
Keith Dahl, Ehlers and Associates, explained that at the September 20, 2022 City Council meeting, the
Council authorized the public sale of $2,030,000 in General Obligation Improvement Bonds. The issue
will be financing the Centre Pointe Street Improvement project. Standards and Poor’s affirmed the City’s
AAA bond rating with a stable outlook. He presented the results of the bid opening noting that the bond
amount was reduced to $1,880,000 in order to receive a lower interest rate.
Mayor Levine commented that this is good news for taxpayers, and she remains proud of the City for
having a long history of fiscally responsible behavior.
Councilor Dugan asked if there is any better rating than AAA stable.
Mr. Dahl replied that is the highest rating that can be obtained.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to approve RESOLUTION 2022-79 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF $1,880,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2022A,
PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, AND LEVYING A TAX
FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF.
Councilor Duggan seconded the motion.
Further discussion: Councilor Duggan referenced the work of staff on this matter.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PUBLIC HEARING
A) RESOLUTION 2022-80 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CENTRE POINTE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 2 of 238
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 3 of 7
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek explained that the City contracted with TKDA on the project and
introduced the representative present.
Larry Poppler, TKDA, explained that the Council is asked to preside over an assessment hearing and adopt
the assessment roll for the Centre Pointe Street Improvements.
Councilor Duggan commented that typically the approximate charge to homeowners is estimated prior to
the project and asked how close the estimate was to the actual assessment.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek referenced the assessment calculation information included in the
report and explained that the mill and overlay and reconstruction areas saw savings while the assessments
within the reclamation areas increased slightly. He noted that the reclamation assessments were about
$400 more while the reconstruction areas saw a savings of $800 and the mill and overlay assessments
would have seen a savings of just over $200 but those were capped at $3,000.
Councilor Duggan commented that residents then would most likely not be shocked when they receive
the bill.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that notices were sent to homeowners in early October alerting
them to this hearing tonight. He stated that the numbers within those notices were higher than what is
projected for assessment at this time.
Councilor Paper referenced the cost per foot/per unit and asked for clarification on the commercial and
residential rates.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that those are assumptions that were used based off the average
City lot and provided more details.
Councilor Paper asked the threshold for entire curb replacement rather than piecing together replacements.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that prior to the project staff makes an estimate on what they
believe would be needed for curb replacement. He stated that in areas where a lot of curb replacement is
needed, they ask for quotes on both methods to determine what the better cost would be.
Councilor Paper asked if the work has been completed on Carmen.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the seeding or mulching should be complete, and staff is
working with two homeowners on tree replacement.
Councilor Paper commented that this work was done in one to two weeks and asked why that cannot be
done on every project.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that was the timeline for Carmen Lane, but the entire project
was completed in two to three months.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 3 of 238
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 4 of 7
Mr. Poppler explained that Carmen Lane is the only way in and out for those residents therefore they
wanted to complete that segment quickly. He noted that the entire Carmen Lane project was not completed
in that time, but the actual street work was.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that the incorrect assessment roll was provided but that has
been corrected within the packet and is also reflected online.
Councilor Duggan moved to open the public hearing.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 4
There being no one coming forward to speak, Councilor Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2022-80 ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CENTRE POINTE STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilor Duggan seconded the motion.
Further discussion: Mayor Levine commented that there is no one present for the public hearing and
perhaps there is a better method to engage residents.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) RESOLUTION 2022-79 APPROVING PLANS AND AUTHORIZING AN ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BID FOR THE ROGERS LAKE AND PARK PLACE POND IMPROVEMENTS
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek explained that the Council was being asked to approve plans and
specifications and authorize an advertisement for bids for the Rogers Lake and Park Place Pond
Improvements.
Councilor Duggan asked if there were any steps staff would need to take with the contractors about the
Blandings turtle.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek did not believe that would be an issue as the pond freezes solid in the
winter and therefore would not be suitable environment for a turtle to winter in.
Councilor Mazzitello asked and received confirmation that this project would be funded through the
stormwater utility fund.
Councilor Paper asked if the ponds are pumped prior to doing the dirt work, or whether the water freezes
and then is scraped.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 4 of 238
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 5 of 7
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that the water would freeze and provided details on that
process.
Councilor Paper recognized that these are two different projects and asked how long each would be
anticipated and whether one project would be completed after the other.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that this is being bid as one project and staff would anticipate
moving from one pond to the next. He stated that the previous pond work has taken three to four days
and therefore would anticipate three to four days per pond.
Councilor Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2022-79 APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE ROGERS LAKE
AND PARK PLACE POND IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
B) REVIEW OF THIRD QUARTER CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND SECOND
QUARTER CITY FINANCIAL REPORT
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson provided an update on strategic priorities for the third quarter.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker reviewed the financial progress report for the second quarter.
Councilor Duggan provided comments on the Par 3 bond payments and anticipated payoff of that.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker commented that the last payment will be made February 1, 2023,
therefore an amount for those bonds was not included in the levy.
Councilor Paper referenced the special park fund and asked for clarification on the amounts reflected.
Finance Director Kristen Schabacker replied that the amounts reflected anticipated interest earnings for
that fund. She stated that park dedication fees are not budgeted for as the City cannot anticipate what
would be developed.
Councilor Paper referenced an ongoing program to encourage partnership of programs to support local
business and asked for more details.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson explained that strategy was meant to provide outreach to businesses
in response to COVID and its related shutdowns. She provided the example of takeout Tuesdays and
explained that has taken a different direction now that those businesses are open. She stated that
businesses were invited to participate in the upcoming Trick or Tee event in order to promote their
businesses and make resident connections.
Councilor Paper referenced the lodging tax which is parked and asked for an update.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 5 of 238
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 6 of 7
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson replied that the City has not yet pursued that conversation but noted
that if directed by the Council staff could work on that more. She explained that a lodging tax would be
used to promote the City.
Councilor Paper asked if the lodging tax could be used to support the Police Department that responds to
many calls for lodging.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson replied that the use of those funds are statutorily defined and that is
not an allowed use.
Councilor Paper commented that he would like to pursue the lodging tax. He referenced the replacement
of the Wentworth warming house and asked how much the City is able to use the special parks fund versus
the general fund for that project.
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson provided details on how the special parks fund could be used and
noted that anything above the size of the original structure could be funded from the special parks fund.
Councilor Duggan referenced the protection of surface water quality and asked that staff remain alert
about steps that may be taken with potential restrictions that may be imposed related to water usage.
Mayor Levine appreciated the work of staff.
COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson announced upcoming events and activities.
City Clerk Christine Lusian provided details on the opportunity for early voting.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilor Mazzitello commented that the Fire Department open house this past weekend was a great
event, as was Dog Day held at the dog park. He stated that the Future Cities Program has kicked off its
15th year at Friendly Hills Middle School and provided details on the after-school program. He
commented that there are three teams of students that will be competing the third weekend in January. He
stated that those teams would like to come to City Hall in February to present their cities.
Councilor Paper wished Councilor Miller good luck tonight in the section playoffs with his team.
Councilor Duggan commented that the small village in his home of Ireland lost ten people as a result of a
gas station explosion. He noted that is a huge loss in a community of 400.
Mayor Levine commented that she had a great time at both Dog Day and the Fire Department open house.
She commented that she is looking forward to the Trick or Tee event and encouraged residents to
participate.
ADJOURN
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 6 of 238
October 18, 2022 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 7
Councilor Duggan moved to adjourn.
Councilor Paper seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 7:08 p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie Levine
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Christine Lusian
City Clerk
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 7 of 238
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 8 of 238
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the City Council Work Session
Tuesday, October 18, 2022
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Levine called the work session to order at 4:00 pm. Councilmembers Duggan, Mazzitello,
and Paper were also present. Councilmember Miller was absent.
Staff in attendance included City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson, Public Works Director Ryan
Ruzek, Finance Director, Kristen Schabacker, Assistant City Administrator Kelly Torkelson,
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence, and City Clerk Christine Lusian.
FIELD AND FACILITY USE POLICY REVIEW
Lawrence presented background and history of the field and facility use policy, including human
resources, priority groups, hours of use, users by season, fees, observations, recommendations,
and next steps. The largest user is MHAA with 77.11% of all permitted hours. MHAA is a
priority three group. Users range from 58.7% residents in the fall and 59% residents in the spring
and summer. Fees have not changed since 2019. Discussion included the December deadline
date, event-day field maintenance and city-owned equipment usage by non-employees, and the
collection and privacy of youth names and addresses and the purpose of that practice. PRC will
review proposed fees in November and Council will review at the November 15 meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
CITY ADMINISTRATOR ANNUAL EVALUATION
A motion was made by Mazzitello, seconded by Duggan, to adjourn to a closed session pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.05, Subdivision 3(a)(3) at 4:48 pm to conduct the City
Administrator’s performance evaluation. Motion passed 4-0.
Mayor Levine called to order a closed session at 4:50 pm.
CALL BACK TO ORDER AND ADJOURNMENT
The Council returned to open session and adjourned the meeting at 5:50 p.m.
____________________________________
Stephanie Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Christine Lusian, City Clerk
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 9 of 238 5b
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 10 of 238
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 13, 2022
The September meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held
on Tuesday, September 13, 2022, at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve.
1.Call to Order – Chair Bob Klepperich called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Roll Call – The following Commissioners were present: Chair Bob Klepperich,
Commissioners: Jaffrey Blanks, Stephanie Meyer, and Michelle Muller; absent: Commissioner
Patrick Cotter, Amy Smith, and Dan Sherer. Student Representative: Meg Murphy. Staff
present: Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
Matt Colwell, and Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek.
3.Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
4.Approval of Agenda
Motion Blanks/second Meyer to approve the agenda. AYES 4: NAYS 0
5.a Approval of Minutes from August 4, 2022 Park Tour Meeting
Motion Blanks/second Muller to approve the minutes of the August 4, 2022 Parks and
Recreation Commission Park Tour Meeting.
Further discussion: Commissioner Meyer referenced the tour of Rogers Lake Park where two
members of the public mentioned exploring the idea of having QR code signs to solicit feedback
from park users. She asked that the statement be added to the minutes.
AYES 4: NAYS 0
5.b Approval of Minutes from August 10, 2022 Regular Meeting
Motion Blanks/second Muller to approve the minutes of the August 10, 2022 Parks and
Recreation Commission Regular Meeting. AYES 4: NAYS 0
6.Citizen Comment Period (for items not on the agenda)
None.
7.Acknowledgement of Reports
Chair Klepperich read the titles of the three updates (Par 3, Recreation, and Park Improvement
Updates) and polled the Commissioners for questions.
7.a Par 3 Update
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence provided an update on recent course
aeration and senior golf passes, which will be discussed at the November meeting. She stated
that staff is still awaiting delivery of the three pieces of equipment that had been ordered. She
advised of a recent award the course received for its rebranding efforts. She also provided a
brief overview of the July financial report.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 11 of 238 5c
Commissioner Blanks asked if there is an estimation on when the course would close.
Ms. Lawrence replied that would be weather dependent.
Chair Klepperich congratulated staff for another award. He asked the effect of the lack of
moisture on the golf course.
Ms. Lawrence stated that it has been an interesting two years with the drought, but the irrigation
system has been running properly which has helped the efforts.
Commissioner Muller asked if there are staffing changes from summer to fall.
Ms. Lawrence stated that the maintenance crew remains the same and the clubhouse staff has
remained constant as well.
7.b Recreation Update
Recreation Program Coordinator Colwell provided a summary of the Parks Celebration
weekend events.
Commissioner Meyer commented that the Parks Celebration was well done and a lot of fun.
She asked if staff has considered not holding the event the same weekend at the Dakota
County fair and other municipal celebrations.
Mr. Colwell replied that staff has discussed alternative dates, but the consensus has been to
stay with this date as the event is for Mendota Heights residents.
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence stated that West Saint Paul is changing their
event to June, so staff has scheduled the 2023 event for the same weekend.
Commissioner Meyer stated that she would like staff to consider not holding the event the
weekend of the County fair. She asked if there is assistance needed for the Trick or Teeing
event.
Mr. Colwell replied that they have made a few tweaks to the event this year and there is a
formal volunteer recruitment system, noting that Commission members are more than welcome
to volunteer at the event.
Commissioner Meyer stated that she would be happy to volunteer.
Student Representative Murphy asked if teens could volunteer.
Mr. Colwell confirmed that teens would be welcome to volunteer as well.
7.c Parks Improvement Update
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence provided an update on park improvement
projects. She stated that the City Council did review the requested capital improvements from
the Parks Commission and highlighted the projects that were included in the preliminary 2023
budget. She stated that the City Council denied the Civic Center field project for this fall and
instead included that project in the 2023 preliminary budget. She stated that the scope of the
Wentworth warming house was reduced and included in the 2023 preliminary budget, and the
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 12 of 238
temporary trailer has been approved for the 2022-2023 season. She also provided an overview
of the special parks fund balance as well as pending projects.
Commissioner Muller thanked staff for presenting the Civic Center field projects. She believed
the project had been budgeted for in the amount of $5,000 but noted that the project did come in
with a higher estimated cost.
Ms. Lawrence did not believe any funds had been budgeted for that project for 2022.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that there is a line item for general park maintenance
and supplies that could have allocated $5,000 but there was not a specific line item for that
project.
Commissioner Muller commented that it seemed that some dirt was brought to the site.
Mr. Ruzek replied that some improvements were made to the field, but he has not heard from
MHAA whether that was favorable.
Commissioner Muller stated that she thought it was clear that Civic Center would not move
forward due to the plans and potential reconstruction of City Hall and the Police Station. She
stated that the dugouts were also approved so that seems confusing.
Mr. Ruzek replied that any potential improvements to City Hall would be known before the end
of the baseball season and therefore the field improvements could occur after the summer
season. He stated that if there were conflicts between the projects, they would reconsider
whether the Civic Center field project should occur. He noted that the dugout project would still
move forward and if those needed to be relocated, that could be done.
Motion Blanks/second Meyer to acknowledge the staff reports. AYES 4: NAYS 0
8. New Business
8.a Ivy Hills Park Tennis Backboard Request
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence stated that on August 2nd staff was
contacted by a resident who was interested in the process of installing a backboard at the tennis
courts at Ivy Hills. She noted that another neighbor also made a similar request. She noted
that the residents do live adjacent to the park. She stated that notices were mailed to
households abutting the park boundary on August 15th soliciting input. She provided
background information on tennis backboards, noting that there is one at Marie Park. She
stated that since the Marie Park backboard was installed in 2015 there have only been two
complaints. She noted that the noise generated would be similar to other park activities such as
basketball or even less than pickleball. She estimated a cost of about $2,500 and believed the
project could be eligible for funding through the special parks fund. She provided the two public
comments that have been received in addition to the two requests from residents.
Commissioner Blanks asked if any negative feedback has been received from residents.
Ms. Lawrence stated that it did not appear the email comment was in favor of the request.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 13 of 238
Commissioner Muller stated that when reading the email, it appeared that the resident would
prefer the funds to be spent in a different manner (maintenance) but explained that these funds
would come from a different source.
Commissioner Meyer asked where the backboard would be and where the sound would be
directed. She stated that the resident that emailed asked if it could be placed near the
basketball court but did not believe that would be an option.
Ms. Lawrence stated that the backboard location would be up for discussion. She believed that
placement near the parking lot would be a benefit. She stated that the backboard would need to
be within the fence and stated that she would not recommend placing it between the courts as
that could prevent use of both courts. She stated that she would recommend the parking lot
side.
Mr. Ruzek confirmed that the parking lot side would be the furthest from homes but was unsure
if the sound is generated from the front or back.
Commissioner Meyer stated that it would seem that the board could be moved.
Ms. Lawrence confirmed that the backboard could be moved within the court if needed.
Commissioner Blanks asked if there would be data available from the manufacturer about how
far the sound travels.
Ms. Lawrence replied that she did not see anything, but staff could try to get more information is
that is desired. She noted that this would be a spring 2023 project, therefore there is not an
urgency in the decision.
Chair Klepperich commented that there is a home to the north on the hill, which would be the
side furthest from the parking lot. He was unsure where the property owner opposed lives.
Mr. Ruzek confirmed that the resident that emailed does live in that home to the north.
Commissioner Meyer acknowledged that she might be opposed if she lived in that home but
had no idea the noise level that is generated.
Commissioner Muller commented that it was noted as similar to the noise from basketball and
noted that her family has a basketball hoop in their driveway and do not receive complaints from
neighbors. She stated that it is a reasonable noise in a residential and/or park area.
Commissioner Meyer asked if there were other requests in addition to the original request from
the resident.
Ms. Lawrence confirmed that there was a request from a resident that brought this forward and
identified the location of that home. She noted that another resident also made a similar
request.
Commissioner Muller stated that perhaps the decision is delayed until more members of the
Commission are present.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 14 of 238
Motion Blanks/second Muller to table the request until more information is received related to
the potential noise and until more Commission members are present for the discussion.
Further discussion: Commissioner Meyer stated that she would go with Ms. Lawrence on a
Friday to measure the noise levels from using the backboard.
AYES 4: NAYS 0
8.b Demographics Presentation
Chair Klepperich stated that this information was requested by the Commission and urged the
Commission to think about how this information can be tied to the parks and recreation strategic
plan.
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence stated that when the request was made to
staff there was not specific information requested so if there is additional data requested, staff
could bring that back at a later date. She explained that knowing the demographics of the
community will help to plan for the needs of the community and could help to target programing
to those demographics as well. She reviewed the strengths and weaknesses that were
identified through the planning process the Commission underwent last year. She reviewed the
different demographics with the Commission. She also reviewed the goals for the future of
Mendota Heights parks and recreation that were identified in the planning process.
Chair Klepperich thanked staff for presenting that information, recognizing that it may take some
time to digest all that data, and this could come back for additional discussion in the future. He
commented that the bike and pedestrian plan staff is working on fits well with the demographic
information.
Commissioner Muller agreed noting that she often uses the trail system for her own recreation
but also uses other recreation amenities in the community with her children.
Commissioner Meyer stated that she had similar thoughts as parents use the parks with their
children, therefore it is not just the youth using those facilities designed for children. She stated
that she would be interested in the median ages for some of the other communities (Sunfish
Lake, Mendota, and Lilydale) as that could provide partnership opportunities for seniors and
active adults in the same way the City partners with other communities on youth programing.
She agreed with attempting to plan ahead, acknowledging that it can be difficult to predict what
will happen in 20 years, and noting that those projections did seem to fit the community. She
stated that it could be helpful to overlap the demographics onto a map to identify any gaps in
services that may exist for different user groups.
Commissioner Muller commented that all of the data was specific to Mendota Heights, with the
exception of the ISD information which includes students from other communities.
Ms. Lawrence agreed that is a good point as even though the schools are located in Mendota
Heights, there are students from other communities attending those schools. She stated that
the athletic association has kids that participate from other communities and therefore those
kids are using the City facilities. She noted that the City also benefits from the amenities founds
in other communities, such as the splashpad at Harmon Park. She noted that the poverty level
data was specific to Mendota Heights, which was a surprise to her. She stated that could tie
into the free and reduced lunch data.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 15 of 238
Commissioner Muller noted that could also be seniors on a fixed income.
Ms. Lawrence agreed and noted that would be an opportunity to look at the programing that
could be provided for that demographic that may not have the means to go to Lifetime Fitness
or drive to a senior center in another community.
Commissioner Blanks appreciated this data as he believes it will help in the community
engagement meetings.
Commissioner Meyer asked if there is a way to find out more specific information on the poverty
level data, such as household size.
Ms. Lawrence provided more details on how the federal poverty level is calculated. She agreed
that having more information could better understand where the need is, and even if that
information could be demographically located to determine gaps that may exist in different areas
of the community.
Commissioner Meyer stated that perhaps there could be an opportunity offer free and reduced
programing for seniors in addition to youth.
Ms. Lawrence noted that perhaps offering programing in a park location would also benefit
those that have a barrier to traveling to a location.
Chair Klepperich acknowledged the plan of the City to do more long-range planning, noting that
he gets a bit cautious about planning further than 15 years as it can become unpredictable after
that. He thanked City staff for gathering this information and the Commission for its input. He
noted that this can come back for further discussion in a few months.
9. Unfinished Business
9.a Community Engagement Outreach Update
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence stated that a template was included in the
packet to be used for engagement meetings. She stated that staff would like the Commission
members to provide an update to the Commission following their engagement event and
provide their notes to staff. She stated that staff would then compile that information to review
with the Commission later this year to assist in creating a task list for 2023.
Chair Klepperich commented that he conducted an engagement meeting at the dog park with
Commissioner Meyer. He stated that all the comments made were positive, including a
comment that the staff mowing the grass was friendly and respectful of the people and animals.
The users also appreciated the tree trimming that was done to improve the security of vehicles
for users of the park.
Commissioner Meyer stated that one of the most helpful things for a metric to provide to staff
would be to tally numbers, such as the number of people attending and the number of those that
were Mendota Heights residents. She commented that 15 people attended and only four were
Mendota Heights residents. She stated that all the comments were positive, and everyone
loves the dog park. She stated that the park does get muddy at times because of the rolling
terrain. She stated that a few comments were made in general about the parks as a whole that
they appreciate the balance between amenities and affordable taxes. She stated that the only
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 16 of 238
suggestion received was related to a regular maintenance schedule for the portable toilets and
there is a preference for the larger size.
Ms. Lawrence noted that all of the parks are required to have the handicap accessible portable
toilet and they are cleaned once per week.
Commissioner Meyer noted that a comment was made that sometimes the locks on those doors
are not working and perhaps that could be mentioned to the cleaning crew. She stated that
people also liked the separation between big and little dogs.
Commissioner Muller commented that it is back to school season so she can begin to meet with
the PTA organizations.
Commissioner Blanks stated that the rotary meeting is scheduled for October 5 and the PTA
meeting is scheduled for October 10.
9.b Park and Recreation Strategic Planning Update
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence stated that she will be reaching out to the
Commission to schedule a worksession for future planning. She noted that she will also be
scheduling a joint meeting with the Natural Resources Commission and this Commission to
discuss the link between natural resources and parks. She reported that the volunteer program
is running and stated that they would love to have teen volunteers at events as well.
10. Staff Announcements
Parks and Recreation Manager Meredith Lawrence shared the following announcements:
• Opening of the Dakota County Big River shelter this Saturday from 3 to 6 p.m.
• Two Rivers High School will be hosting a movie night Saturday
• There will be a Makers Market on Saturday, September 24
• Engagement is still open for the bike ped plan
• The City is now looking for warming house staff for the upcoming season
• Other events can be found on the City’s website
11. Student Representative Update
Student Representative Murphy stated that she would be interested in information on teen
volunteer opportunities and will focus on that for the future.
12. Commission Comments and Park Updates
Commissioner Blanks
• Activity is slowing down at the parks, but they are still busy with people walking their
dogs and riding bikes
• Encouraged residents to spend time outside while the weather is still nice
Commissioner Muller
• Rogers Lake continues to be an active park
• Kensington is typically a quite park but did notice three or four trees removed
• A resident was happy with the lilacs that are coming in where brush was previously
removed at Kensington
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 17 of 238
Commissioner Meyer
• The parks remain busy, and people are enjoying the lights for pickleball
• Hopes to attend the Dakota County open house event this weekend
• There is a small portion of trail that goes toward Victoria Highlands Park which has an
awkward 90-degree angle that could be considered in the bike ped plan
Chair Klepperich
• Thanks Student Representative Murphy for her participation
• Thanks to staff for their participation and the background information provided to the
Commission
• Acknowledged a donation from MHAA for the pitching mound at Victoria Highlands
• Commented on the budget process and appreciation for the items from the Commission
that were included in the preliminary budget
• Asked that users of the trails be cautious of other users
13. Adjourn
Motion Blanks/Second Muller to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 PM
AYES 4: NAYS 0
Minutes drafted by:
Amanda Staple
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 18 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 16
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
August 23, 2022
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August
23, 2022 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M.
The following Commissioners were present: Commissioners Patrick Corbett, Sally Lorberbaum,
Cindy Johnson, Michael Toth, Brian Petschel, and Andrew Katz. Those absent: Chair Litton Field.
Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as submitted.
Approval of July 26, 2022 Minutes
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CORBETT, TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 26, 2022.
FURTHER DISCUSSION: ACTING CHAIR LORBERBAUM NOTED ON PAGE FIVE,
ABOVE ITEM B, IT SHOULD STATE, “…ADVISED THE APPLICANT THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL…” ON PAGE SEVEN, THE FIFTH PARAGRAPH, IT SHOULD STATE, “…ZIG
ZAG ARCHITECTURE SHOWN IN THE PLAN WOULD…” ON PAGE SEVEN THE THIRD
PARAGRAPH FROM THE BOTTOM, IT SHOULD STATE, “…COMMENTED THAT
ASKED IF…”
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: 1 (KATZ)
Public Presentations
A)City Wide Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan – (Presented by HKGI)
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that the City received a grant from Dakota County to
develop a city-wide bike and pedestrian master plan. He introduced the consultant present tonight
to review the draft plan. He noted that any input from the public could be provided to him or on
the interactive mapping tool directly.
Gabrielle Grinde, HKGI, stated that they have been working with staff on the development of this
plan and are currently in the second phase of engagement. She reviewed the project process which
identifying existing facilities, issues, and opportunities. She also reviewed the plan purpose and
goals including importance and value of a connected bicycle and pedestrian system, plan strategy
and organization. She displayed a map identifying the existing facilities and provided a high-level
summary of the phase one input. She highlighted examples of the system components that will be
included in the recommendations. She also displayed a map identifying the issues and
opportunities. She stated that phase two engagement began and few weeks ago and reviewed the
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 19 of 238 5d
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 16
activities that have occurred thus far, noting that the interactive map tool is available for
engagement. She highlighted the next steps, noting that the draft plan will be presented to the
Council at a workshop in September and then at a regular Council meeting in October.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum recognized that the interactive mapping tool was included in the Friday
News and asked how else this could be publicized to the residents.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that staff has reached out to many groups. He noted
that staff has reached out to a local bicycle shop and an email was sent to their mailing list, ADA
residents to gain that perspective, and because there was a lack of youth perspective in phase one,
they are attempting to solicit more youth comments in phase two. He noted that they are also using
social media.
Commissioner Johnson stated that cross county athletic coaches utilize the roads for training and
stated that she could provide feedback from that group.
Commissioner Katz believed that there is a Mendota Heights bicycle club and suggested staff reach
out to that group.
Commissioner Johnson stated that they could also reach out to the Mendota Heights mom’s club.
Ms. Grinde stated that the interactive tool would be great for providing comments and noted that
additional comments could be provided to City staff.
Hearings
A) PLANNING CASE 2022-14
MICHAEL FRATTALLONE, 1010 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY - MRCCA
PERMIT
Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that Michael Frattallone is seeking
approval of a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Permit in order to approve new
land alterations and vegetation clearing on his personal property located at 1010 Sibley Memorial
Highway.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided a planning staff report and a presentation
on this planning item to the Commission (available for viewing through the City’s website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Commissioner Petschel referenced the soil map and asked if that reflects the state of the land before
work was done by the property owner. He asked how the previous owner was allowed to get away
with this as it appears the entire area was scraped clean rather than select removal of diseased trees.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 20 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 16
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided background information noting that the
site had returned to a natural state.
Commissioner Petschel commented that it would seem there would be room to close a loophole
which allowed that previous property owner to receive his bond back.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that the previous property owner was
allowed to do the clearing as a precursor for development. He provided additional details on the
process with that previous property owner. He stated that Mr. Frattallone then purchased the
property and removed some of the unwanted vegetation and has now presented a plan to fix the
property.
Commissioner Toth asked if there was any follow up between property owners to ensure the
property was properly managed.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that staff met with the previous
property owner a number of times and they believed that enough progress had been made as the
intention was for development to occur, noting that development never occurred.
Commissioner Johnson commented that the previous property owner was required to plant 13
native trees under the previous approval and stated that in an aerial view those trees were planted.
She stated that if that area became overgrown, she could see how Mr. Frattallone could have
thought some of those trees were dead or dying, because tamarack trees lose their needles when
stressed.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti stated that there should be a replacement plan for
the trees that were removed. He stated that staff would like to see more of those replacements
along the east side, of hillside area, or anywhere else on the property. He noted that they have
recommended the same species but welcomed any other suggestions as well. He stated that they
would like to have the property seeded and covered as soon as possible with the trees planted as
well.
Commissioner Johnson noted that all the trees recommended are native overstory trees.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum referenced the three-year restoration plan and asked if staff checks on
the property each year.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that there is no requirement for inspection,
but staff would keep an eye on the property because of its history. He stated that the Natural
Resources Coordinator or another staff member could regularly visit the site. He noted that they
could take photos and continue to provide updates to the Commission if desired.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum suggested that regular updates be provided.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that staff can provide regular visits to
the property, even once per month during the growing season.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 21 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 16
Commissioner Johnson commented that she believes that relates to the three-year maintenance and
management plan. She believed that the trees needed to be planted before those three years.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti suggested that the replacement of the trees be
allowed to occur within the three-year period, while the restoration plan should be implemented
immediately.
Commissioner Corbett asked if there is still thistle remaining onsite and whether the plan accounts
for that.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti confirmed that there is still thistle as staff stopped
them before they got to that area. He confirmed that staff would want that removed as it is invasive.
Commissioner Toth referenced the narrative within the packet which mentions the stop work order.
He stated that there have been a number of situations recently where a resident has begun work on
their property without knowing the requirement of the MRCCA permit. He asked how the City
can do a better job educating residents of the required process.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that there is information on the City
website and included in the newsletters. He stated that he intended to send a direct mailing to all
property owners in the MRCCA but that has not yet happened. He stated that this year has been a
bit odd with a number of wetland violations and this was one of the MRCCA violations that they
caught as well. He stated that Mr. Frattallone has been good to work with and he wants to fix this
and do a good job.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked the chances of the runoff going down the driveway and impacting
the neighboring property as currently designed.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that there is not a change to the historical drainage
patterns of the property. He noted that the property to the west has experienced drainage problems
from this property for years. He stated that this plan will not make that issue better or worse. He
stated that if a new home is constructed on the second lot, it would need to create stormwater
treatment to offset the impervious surface. He noted that this project would not add impervious
surface. He stated that there is a condition to replace the 14 trees and those trees could absorb
some water.
Commissioner Johnson asked if staff has the stormwater flow map for the property.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek described the path drainage takes entering this property from
the east and flowing to the west.
Commissioner Johnson referenced the profile showing the sod and trees. She stated that to the
right of the volleyball court the elevation goes up and asked if there is more grading that would be
done as the profile sketch does not match the grading of the property.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 22 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 16
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that staff stopped the grading halfway
through. He stated that the applicant can provide more details.
Commissioner Toth asked the type of soil on the property.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti described the soil conditions.
Commissioner Toth stated that type of soil naturally absorbs water.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti confirmed that the area will act as a natural
infiltration basin for the water that comes from the east. He stated that staff hopes that the water
would pond or pool in the area of the sand volleyball court.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum opened the public hearing.
Nicole Frattallone, 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway, stated that they are trying to make the
property look better. She commented that the weeds were so thick they were trying to improve
that and were not aware a permit was needed but would like to move forward in the right way.
Stephen Mastey, landscape architect representing the applicant, stated that they are excited to hear
from neighbors and will then provide additional input.
Alan Anderson, 1645 James Court, stated that his property backs up to the Frattallone property.
He commented that there is a significant wooded area that was cleared away. He is thankful that
Commissioner Johnson brought up the replacement of trees as there were a significant number of
mature trees on the southern half of the property that were removed and do not appear to be a part
of the discussion tonight. He recognized that the trees were not on his property, therefore he does
not have control over that, but commented that there was wildlife habitat in that area.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked if the trees on the southern half were removed by the previous
owner or current owner.
Mr. Anderson replied that the trees were removed by the current property owner.
Pat Anderson, 1645 James Court, stated that she was a bit confused by the staff presentation as
most of the work mentioned was in front of the house whereas there concern with what occurred
in the back of the home. She stated that area was heavily wooded, but those trees are now gone as
is the wildlife that used to be in that area. She stated that they were aware of the work the previous
owner did as well as the replacement planting that resident did.
Commissioner Johnson asked the type of trees that were removed.
Mrs. Anderson was unsure but confirmed there were not evergreen trees.
Mr. Mastey commented that there are a lot of boxelders that are diseased and dying. He provided
a quick drainage plan he drew and explained that most of the stormwater comes from the east,
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 23 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 16
moving across the site from right to left. He stated that they are not planning to change the drainage
plan and the only grading would be a few inches. He stated that the profile sketch was not perfect
and meant to show the trees, recreational land, and sloping of the property which is high on the
right and low on the left. He stated that the only grading would be the soil correction that they had
planned. He stated that he was on the site five years ago and provided some photographs noting
that the area was prepped to make way for a future home site, driveway, and associated
improvements. He also provided a photograph of the site as it looks today, noting that they are
not requesting to remove significant vegetation but to manage those areas and complete soil
corrections. He stated that there is class five material, and the drainage moves across that area to
the next property. He stated that they would be loosening that soil up to better drain and then add
native plantings that would benefit pollinators and assist in water quality treatment. He provided
a sketch of what the area would look like with the volleyball court and landscaping as proposed.
Commissioner Toth noted a berm shown in the sketch displayed.
Mr. Mastey provided additional details noting that they would keep the inherited grade of the
property and would just be amending the soils. He provided additional details on the invasive
species that exist on the site and the management that they would like to complete. He stated that
with the plantings they are attempting to increase biodiversity, targeting pollinators. He explained
why the buffer area around the property is important to their plan. He stated that their plan is to
create a habitat for pollinators in that buffer area. He commented that the biggest issue they had
is that there was a requirement to plant trees five or six years ago. He noted that since that time
those trees may have become diseased and dying. He stated that these property owners inherited
landscaping that appeared to be neglected and asked how they could be held accountable for
something that was not in great condition when they decided to try to make it better. He stated
that the time limits for the trees required by the previous property owner has passed, the property
was neglected, and the new property owners are trying to make their property better that allows
them to enjoy their property and incorporate biodiversity that is lacking.
Commissioner Corbett asked if the applicant would address the concerns of the neighbor.
Ms. Frattallone welcomed the neighbors to come over and discuss the trees they were concerned
with.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked if the property owner would be willing to replant trees on the
southern portion of the site.
Ms. Frattallone commented that there were some dead trees on the southern portion of the property
that were leaning towards the home along with invasive. She confirmed that they would be willing
to add trees on that portion of the property.
Commissioner Johnson stated that when she visited the site, looking towards the north there were
many cottonwood trees ranging in size and asked the plan for those trees.
Mr. Mastey identified the small bushy trees that are invasive in that area. He stated that there are
also Chinese elm and buckthorn in that area which are also invasive, and the cottonwoods are
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 24 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 16
mixed in. He stated that in order to manage the invasives, they would need to remove those trees
and correct the soils. He did not believe the invasives could be managed without damaging the
cottonwoods.
Commissioner Johnson commented that cottonwoods are pollinator friendly and desired in the
bluff area, therefore she would like to see some of the six-foot cottonwoods remain.
Mr. Mastey stated that while it would be nice to keep those trees, they are growing on a parking
lot surface and therefore it would be impossible to correct the soils to support the native
landscaping without disturbing those trees. He stated that if a cottonwood were to come up after
the site is stabilized, they could leave it.
Commissioner Johnson commented that while a native planting is good, it does not provide the
same biological and ecological benefit as trees.
Mr. Mastey agreed but noted that there are trees existing on the site while it lacks the biodiversity
that the plantings would provide.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked for a
motion to close the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER TOTH MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KATZ, TO CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Petschel stated that he agrees with the plans for the front, but it sounds like there
was removal of an unknown amount of vegetation in the back without a permit and stated that may
need to be addressed as a second issue.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti stated that under the previous 2017 plan, the
former staff member identified a lot of the areas around the home that would be approved for
removal of dead/diseased/dying trees. He stated that Mr. Frattallone agreed that there was work
in the back to remove dangerous trees. He stated that the homeowner stated that they are willing
to replant in that area and he trusts that staff could work with the homeowner to replace those trees.
Commissioner Petschel stated that he is upset by the work of the previous property owner as that
work was allowed with the preface that a home would be built.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that he believed the previous property
owner had an intention to build a second home or the lot split would not have moved forward.
Commissioner Petschel stated that he feels that he was misled by the previous property owner and
therefore does not want to fall into that same pit. He asked if the City would be allowed to place
a lien on the property for future projects of that nature.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 25 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 16
Commissioner Katz commented that this is beyond the scope of this case.
Commissioner Corbett commented that the presentation mentioned that thankfully nothing in the
bluff impact zone (BIZ) was touched but it appears that perhaps there was work in that area
therefore it seems like this is an incomplete scope of the project.
Commissioner Petschel commented that the property needs to be restored per the MRCCA rules.
Commissioner Corbett stated that data needs to be established related to the trees on the southern
portion of the property in the same manner the trees on the north are being discussed.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that there is nothing wrong with removing
trees in the BIZ if they are considered invasive, or diseased, or dying. He believed that it is fair
for the homeowner to offer the replacement trees.
Commissioner Toth asked if the homeowner removed those trees or whether the contractor
removed the trees.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that the contractor did the tree removal and
staff spoke with the contractor to stop the work.
Commissioner Johnson asked if this could be broken into two permits, requiring the homeowner
to come in for an after the fact permit for the south side.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that staff would like to see the site
buttoned up as soon as possible and would not want to delay that action. He stated that the Natural
Resources Coordinator and Public Works Director can work with the applicant and Mr. Mastey on
the tree replanting.
Commissioner Petschel stated that if there was substantial removal in that area, it could be brought
back as a separate violation.
Commissioner Johnson stated that she would prefer to do an after the fact permit for the south side,
which would allow this to continue to move forward.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KATZ, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MRCCA PERMIT TO MICHAEL FRATTALLONE
AND FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1010 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, WHICH
WOULD ALLOW VEGETATION CLEARING AND RESTORATION, ALONG WITH SOME
EXISTING AND FINISHED LAND DISTURBANCE AND GRADING ACTIVITY, AND
PLACEMENT OF A NEW SAND VOLLEYBALL COURT ALL BASED ON THE FINDINGS
OF FACT THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE POLICIES AND
STANDARDS OF THE MRCCA ORDINANCE AND CITY CODE, WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 26 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 9 of 16
1. THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS AND WORK DESCRIBED, ILLUSTRATED AND
DETAILED ON THE “LANDSCAPE PLAN – FRATTALLONE RESIDENCE – 1010
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY” AND ANY OTHER PLANS RELATED TO THIS
PROJECT SHALL BE THE ONLY WORK OR IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWED AND
APPROVED UNDER THIS NEW MRCCA PERMIT.
2. ALL NEW NATIVE PLANTING WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MNL
SAVANNA MIX – SHORTGRASS SEED PLANTING LIST AS PROVIDED BY THE
APPLICANT.
3. NO EXISTING TREES OR VEGETATION IS ALLOWED TO BE REMOVED UNLESS
THEY ARE IDENTIFIED AS DISEASED, DYING OR DEAD, OR CONSIDERED
INVASIVE OR NOXIOUS VEGETATION. ANY OTHER TREES OR VEGETATION
REQUESTED TO BE REMOVED BY THE APPLICANT MUST BE REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY’S NATURAL RESOURCES COORDINATOR.
4. FULL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION MEASURES WILL BE PUT IN PLACE
PRIOR TO AND DURING ANY NEW GRADING, PLANTING AND
CONSTRUCTION WORK ACTIVITIES.
5. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL FOLLOW APPLICABLE
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL AS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE
DOCUMENT. THE APPLICANTS MUST SUBMIT AND RECEIVE A SWPP PERMIT
AND NPDES PERMIT (IF NECESSARY) PRIOR TO START OF ANY NEW
CONSTRUCTION WORK.
6. ALL WORK ON SITE WILL ONLY BE PERFORMED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF
7:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M.
WEEKENDS.
7. THE CITY WILL ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AFTER THE
VEGETATION RESTORATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.
8. THE LOSS OF TREES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BE EVALUATED
FOR REPLANTING.
9. A THREE-YEAR MAINTENANCE PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED.
FURTHER DISCUSSION: COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL STATED THAT HE DOES NOT
WANT TO PUNISH THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE ACTIONS OF THE
PREVIOUS PROPERTY OWNER. HE STATED THAT THIS RESIDENT IS WILLING TO
SPEND MONEY TO FIX AN EYESORE AND POTENTIAL WATER ISSUE. HE STATED
THAT HE IS NOT THRILLED THAT THIS WILL MOSTLY BE LAWN. HE BELIEVED
THAT THE CITY SHOULD LOOK FURTHER INTO HOW IT CAN BIND PEOPLE TO THE
WORK THEY SAY THEY WILL DO.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT STATED THAT THEY HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME
DISCUSSING THIS AND APPLAUDS THE WORK OF THIS RESIDENT AS IT IS A STEP
IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION BUT BELIEVES THE SAME ATTENTION SHOULD BE
GIVEN TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE HOME.
ACTING CHAIR LORBERBAUM STATED THAT IS INCLUDED IN THE MOTION.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 27 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 10 of 16
COMMISSIONER CORBETT STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER TO TABLE THIS IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE THE DATA ON THE TREES THAT WERE REMOVED.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, TO
TABLE CASE #2022-14 UNTIL MORE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ABOUT THE
SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
AYES: 3 (CORBETT, TOTH, JOHNSON
NAYS: 3
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL ASKED WHAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO MOVE FORWARD
FOR THOSE THAT VOTED TO TABLE.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE 14 TREES
IN THE PLAN THAT ARE NATIVE. SHE STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE
SOUTH SIDE HAVE A SEPARATE AFTER THE FACT PERMIT.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL COMMENTED THAT WOULD BE AN ENFORCEMENT
ACTION BECAUSE THERE WAS NOT A VEGETATION REMOVAL PERMIT. HE
BELIEVED THAT WOULD BE HEAVY HANDED AS THE APPLICANT IS HERE.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON ASKED HOW ELSE THEY COULD ENSURE THE DATA IS
PROVIDED AND THE ISSUE IS ADDRESSED IN THE SAME MANNER THIS IS BEING
ADDRESSED. SHE NOTED THAT WOULD ALLOW THIS PORTION TO MOVE
FORWARD.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TIM BENETTI STATED THAT STAFF WILL
WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THAT AREA AND BELIEVED THE
CONDITIONS PROPOSED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL IS FAIR. HE STATED THAT
HE WOULD LIKE TO GET THIS BACK ON TRACK TO BUTTON UP THE SITE BEFORE
WINTER SETS IN. HE BELIEVED THAT THE EVALUATION COULD BE DONE BY
STAFF AND PRESENTED AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. HE CONFIRMED THE
ADDITION OF 14 TREES BEING ADDED TO THE SITE AS RECOMMENDED BY
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL STATED THAT HE AGREES THAT STAFF COULD WORK
WITH THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE PRIOR
TO PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ACTING CHAIRPERSON LORBERBAUM CONFIRMED THAT SHE WOULD AGREE TO
THAT.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON ASKED HOW THE INPUT WOULD BE GAINED FROM THE
ANDERSONS ON WHAT OCCURRED.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 28 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 11 of 16
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TIM BENETTI STATED THAT STAFF
WOULD MEET WITH THE APPLICANT AND THEIR LANDSCAPING ARCHITECT IN
ORDER TO EVALUATE THE SOUTH SIDE AND COME TO AN AGREEMENT WHICH
WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL. HE STATED THAT HE WILL ALSO
RECOMMEND THAT THE APPLICANT MEET WITH THE ANDERSONS TO SOLICIT
INPUT. HE NOTED THAT THE ANDERSONS COULD REACH OUT TO HIM FOR MORE
INFORMATION OR COULD ATTEND THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS WELL.
COMMISSIONER TOTH STATED THAT AFTER STAFF VISITS THE PROPERTY, HE
WOULD LIKE THAT INFORMATION TO BE SHARED WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TIM BENETTI CONFIRMED THAT HE
COULD SEND THAT INFORMATION TO THE COMMISSION MEMBERS. HE NOTED
THAT WOULD ONLY BE INFORMATIVE AND THERE COULD NOT BE DISCUSSION
AND THERE SHOULD NOT BE A REPLY TO ALL BY ANY MEMBERS OF THE
COMMISSION.
ACTING CHAIR LORBERBAUM REVIEWED THE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS THAT
HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE MOTION.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 1 (CORBETT)
Acting Chair Lorberbaum advised that the City Council would consider this application at its
September 6, 2022 meeting.
B) PLANNING CASE 2022-19
XCEL ENERGY, 944 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY – MRCCA PERMIT AND
VARIANCE
Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that Xcel Energy (Northern States
Power Company) is seeking approval of a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA)
Permit and Variance, in order to replace and install a new ten-foot-high security fence on their
natural gas transfer/distribution site, located at 944 Sibley Memorial Highway.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided a planning staff report and a presentation
on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s
website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum opened the public hearing.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 29 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 12 of 16
Brian Sullivan, Xcel Energy, stated that they are continuing to make improvements to their
facilities and identified that a better fence should be provided at this location. He provided details
on the proposed fence, noting that it would be difficult to crawl to the top.
Commissioner Johnson stated that she visited the website of the fence manufacturer and noticed
that there were clear pictures of the galvanized finish which can be very striking. She stated that
it was her understanding that the fence is also available in black and believed that might be a better
fit for the site given the adjacent uses.
Mr. Sullivan stated that he was unsure. He stated that the initial response would be to stay with
the galvanized finish because it holds up.
Commissioner Johnson replied that it is her understanding that the product would be galvanized
and then painted black before shipped. She commented that a ten-foot tall, galvanized fence could
be visually intrusive.
Mr. Sullivan stated that in his experience galvanized does not reflect.
Commissioner Toth asked if Commissioner Johnson would request the fence to be black on all
four sides, or only the side adjacent to the highway.
Commissioner Johnson stated that the product is shown in black as an option.
Commissioner Corbett stated that perhaps Xcel has qualified this product in other instances. He
noted that perhaps the paint chips off or causes other issues.
Commissioner Johnson asked if a preference could be made for black and if Xcel could not use
black, the galvanized could move forward.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that from a zoning standpoint, he
would not have the ability to dictate color but because this request is different from what is
typically allowed, the Commission could provide that preference.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked if foliage could be recommended in front of the fence to lessen
the impact.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that the purpose and intent of the fence
is to prevent people from climbing the fence but also allow visibility for safety and security and
therefore covering the fence with foliage would defeat that purpose.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked for a
motion to close the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 30 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 13 of 16
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED MRCCA PERMIT REQUEST FROM
XCEL ENERGY AND FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 944 SIBLEY MEMORIAL
HIGHWAY, ALONG WITH THE VARIANCE TO INSTALL A NEW TEN FOOT SECURITY
FENCE ON THE SUBJECT SITE WITH A COLOR PREFERENCE OF BLACK, BASED ON
THE FINDINGS OF FACT SUPPORTING THIS VARIANCE APPLICATION REQUEST AND
CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Acting Chair Lorberbaum advised that the City Council would consider this application at its
September 6, 2022 meeting.
C) PLANNING CASE 2022-20
DICK BJORKLUND, 2511 CONDON COURT – LOT SPLIT
Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that Dick Bjorklund is seeking approval
to subdivide a parcel of property generally located near the southwest corner of Condon Court and
Mendota Heights Road. The property is officially addressed as 2511 Condon Court. This
proposed lot split is actually a division of the lot in order to create two separate parcels for a new
twin home development, thus providing a legal dividing (or demising) line between both
residential units. This lot split/subdivision request requires City review and approval before any
plat or survey can be accepted and recorded by Dakota County.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided a planning staff report and a presentation
on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s
website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Commissioner Johnson noted an update to condition two within the findings of fact.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum opened the public hearing.
Dick Bjorklund, applicant, stated that he began the project in 2015 and provided background
information. He stated that he believes a twin home would look better on this lot because of the
frontage and the additional space that would be available for greenspace and tree preservation.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 31 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 14 of 16
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked for a
motion to close the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVE OF THE LOT SPLIT AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. APPROVAL OF THIS LOT SPLIT CONFIGURATION IS ONLY FOR THE BENEFIT
OF ACCOMMODATING A NEW ATTACHED TWIN HOME DWELLING BETWEEN
BOTH PARCELS. THE SPLITTING OF THIS R-2 ZONED LOT DOES NOT PROVIDE
ANY ALLOWANCE TO DEVELOP A DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING
AND/OR DETACHED TOWNHOME DWELLING ON EACH NEW PARCEL.
2. AS PART OF ANY NEW BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE NEW TWIN
HOME DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANT AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL
SUBMIT FULL GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY STAFF.
3. PARK DEDICATION FEE OF $4,000 (FOR ONE ADDED RESIDENTIAL UNIT)
WILL BE PAID BEFORE THE SUBDIVISION IS ALLOWED TO BE RECORDED
WITH DAKOTA COUNTY.
4. THE EXISTING OAK TREES ON THE SITE SHALL BE PRESERVED.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Acting Chair Lorberbaum advised that the City Council would consider this application at its
September 6, 2022 meeting.
D) PLANNING CASE 2022-21
JEFF SIMEK, 1753 SUTTON LANE – PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that Jeff Simek is requesting
consideration of a preliminary/final plat of three parcels to be titled “B Marie Addition”. As part
of this platting, Mr. Simek is also requesting a conditional use permit to construct a new 26’ x 38’
detached garage. The property is located at 1753 Sutton Lane.
Hearing notices were published and mailed to all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments
or objections to this request were received.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 32 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 15 of 16
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided a planning staff report and a presentation
on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s
website).
Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with conditions.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked if the structure would be called a garage or accessory structure.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that the terms are interchangeable.
Commissioner Petschel asked if a dedication fee would be required for a plat.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that in this case, the lots were originally
platted in the separate developments and therefore park dedication was already paid by each unit.
He stated that this would not create a new lot and would simply be combination of lots.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the drainage from the new garage would impact the adjacent
home.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that there would be a ten-foot side yard
setback and the adjacent property would not be impacted.
Commissioner Johnson referenced the mention of native grasses and asked for a more detailed
explanation.
Acting Chair Lorberbaum opened the public hearing.
Jeff Simek, applicant, stated that it was always his hope to build a second garage and believes that
this setup fits well on the property. He stated that he has spoken with his neighbors to answer any
questions. He provided details on the native grasses proposed and other landscaping elements.
Commissioner Johnson commented that there are differences between decorative and native
grasses and asked that the details be included prior to the City Council meeting.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek provided details on his conversations with a neighboring
property owner that did not oppose the project after finding out more details.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Acting Chair Lorberbaum asked for a
motion to close the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL TO
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 33 of 238
PC APPROVED 10/25/2022
August 23, 2022 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 16 of 16
COMMISSIONER KATZ MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL, TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT OF “B MARIE
ADDITION” ALONG WITH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
OVERSIZED GARAGE NOT TO EXCEED 988 SQUARE FEET IN AREA, AND FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1753 SUTTON LANE, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT
AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THE NEW DETACHED GARAGE MUST MATCH THE OVERALL ARCHITECTURE
AND DESIGN OF THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DWELLING ON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 988 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE (BUILDING
AREA).
2. THE PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODE STANDARDS NOTED IN
SECTION 12-1D-3 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND MINNESOTA BUILDING
CODE STANDARDS.
3. THE APPLICANT MUST OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT PRIOR TO ANY
EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION OS SAID GARAGE.
4. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS PART OF THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND
LOCAL REGULATIONS AND CODES, AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT.
5. THE NATIVE GRASS SPECIES SHALL BE SPECIFIED.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Acting Chair Lorberbaum advised that the City Council would consider this application at its
September 6, 2022 meeting.
New/Unfinished Business
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided an update on projects recently approved
by the City Council that had recommendations from the Planning Commission. He also noted the
workshop occurring the following night.
Adjournment
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:34 P.M.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 34 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cheryl Jacobson, City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Administrator Performance Evaluation Summary
INTRODUCTION
Under Minnesota Statutes 13D.05, subd. 3, the City Council may close a meeting to evaluate the
performance of the City Administrator and shall summarize its conclusions regarding the
evaluation at its next open meeting.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the terms of the employment agreement with City Administrator Cheryl
Jacobson, the City Council conducted a performance evaluation during a closed meeting held on
October 18, 2022.
The city council evaluated the City Administrator in the following areas and found that the City
Administrator: 1) exceeds performance standards in the completion of essential job functions; 2)
greatly exceeds or exceeds performance standards in management core competencies including
strategic agility, community vision and purpose, analytical thinking and planning, decision making
and impact on results; 3) greatly exceeds or exceeds performance standards in interpersonal core
competencies including communication, handling conflict and difficult situations, organizational
expertise, working with others and community; and 4) greatly exceeds or exceeds performance
standards in the overall performance of the city administrator position.
BUDGET IMPACT
The City Administrator’s annual salary is a budgeted expense. Effective October 1, 2022 the
City Administrator’s new annual rate of pay is $149,563, which is step 6 of pay grade 20 of the
city’s compensation plan.
ACTION REQUESTED
If the City Council concurs, it should, by motion, approve the summary of conclusions of the
City Administrator’s performance evaluation for the time period of October 1, 2021 to
September 30, 2022.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 35 of 238 5e
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 36 of 238
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Dave Dreelan, Fire Chief
Dale Stein, Fire Department Training Captain
SUBJECT: Fire Department Training Assistant Appointment
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to approve the appointment of Rebecca Johnson to the position of
Training Assistant for the Mendota Heights Fire Department.
BACKGROUND
The Mendota Heights Fire Department Training Assistant works under the direction and
supervision of the Training Captain. The position helps to plan, create, organize, evaluate and
coordinate fire and emergency medical training for the Department. During an emergency the
Training Assistant assumes the duties of a regularly appointed firefighter.
The Department has completed the internal recruitment process to fill the position and
recommends the appointment of Rebecca Johnson to the position. Rebecca is a valued member
of the department and brings a wealth of administrative and educational experience to the
position.
BUDGET IMPACT
The position of Training Assistant within the Fire Department is a budgeted position. The position
has an annual stipend amount of $1,738 (2022 rate).
ACTION RECOMMENDED
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appointment of Rebecca Johnson to the
position of Training Assistant for the Fire Department.
ACTION REQUIRED
If City Council concurs, it should by motion, approve the appointment of Rebecca Johnson to the
position of Training Assistant for the Fire Department.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 37 of 238 5f
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 38 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Parks and Recreation Manager
Matt Colwell, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Resolution 2022-81 Accepting Recreation Event Donations
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to formally accept donations received from Petco—West Saint Paul and
Cub Foods—Inver Grove Heights.
BACKGROUND
By state law, all donations to the City must be accepted by the City Council by means of a
resolution.
The City hosted its first ever Mendota Heights Dog Day event on October 15. Petco—West Saint
Paul graciously donated a gift basket, valued at $115 for the event. On October 22 the City hosted
a Trick or Teeing event and Cub Foods—Inver Grove Heights donated thirty pumpkins valued at
$210.
The City is grateful for the generosity of these donations and a thank you note will be sent to both
business owners.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve Resolution 2022-81.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Council concurs, it should, by motion adopt RESOLUTION 2022-81, FORMALLY
ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF RECREATION EVENT DONATIONS.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 39 of 238 5g
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2022-81
A RESOLUTION FORMALLY ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF
RECREATION EVENT DONATIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights desires to follow Minnesota Statute 465.03
“Gifts to Municipalities”; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Statute requires a resolution to accept gifts to
municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously acknowledged gifts with a resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights have duly considered this
matter and wish to acknowledge the civic mindedness of citizens and officially recognize their
donations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights is accepting the following donations for the City’s Dog Day event on October
15 and Trick or Teeing event on October 22.
DONOR DONATION VALUE
Petco—West Saint Paul Gift Basket $115
Cub Foods—Inver Grove Heights Pumpkins (Quantity: 30) $210
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of November, 2022.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Stephanie Levine, Mayor
ATTEST:
Christine Lusian, City Clerk
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 40 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Insurance Renewal
BACKGROUND
Each year the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) requires the city to decide if
we wish to purchase additional liability coverage and a waiver of monetary limits on claims. The
base coverage is $1,500,000 which is the basic statutory limit. In the past, the city has not
purchased additional coverage and elected not to waive the statutory tort limits. Our insurance
coverage period runs November 1, 2022 to November 1, 2023.
BUDGET IMPACT
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council pass a motion to not purchase additional
liability coverage and elect not to waive the statutory tort limits.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 41 of 238 5h
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 42 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Purchase of Two Radar Speed Limit Feedback Signs
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to approve the purchase of two radar feedback speed limit signs.
BACKGROUND
The city has installed four radar feedback speed limit signs, two on Marie Avenue and two on 1st
Avenue. The Council also recently approved the addition of a fifth sign which will be located on
Marie Avenue near Two Rivers High School.
The areas where the signs have been installed are major city roadways or high volume cut thru roads
in residential districts. All existing signs are located on roadways where centerline striping exists.
DISCUSSION
Staff has been in discussion with residents on Emerson Avenue which is proposed for rehabilitation
in 2024. This project was originally identified for rehabilitation in 2023 but is proposed to be
delayed until 2024 due to Saint Paul Regional Water Service identifying a need to replace the
watermain as part of the project.
Emerson Avenue is a cut thru street for vehicles traversing between Wachtler Avenue to Dodd Road.
The typical route is along Emerson Avenue and then either heading south to 1st Avenue or north
along Sylvandale Avenue to Ivy Falls Avenue.
The city awarded a contract to TKDA to develop a feasibility report for this project. Questionnaires
have been mailed to the residents. Staff is proposing to add the radar feedback speed limit signs
ahead of the project to assess their effectiveness in traffic calming along this route. The proposed
project is also anticipated to add additional traffic calming elements such as bump outs and an on-
street or off-street trail.
BUDGET
Staff received a quote from Traffic Logix for the purchase of these signs which match the existing
city owned signs for uniformity. The signs are available on the Sourcewell contract. The signs are
$3,185 each. Staff is recommending to purchase the signs from the Streets sign budget which is
currently under spent for 2022. The total cost of the two signs is $6,370. The attached quote is for
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 43 of 238 5i
four signs. Staff will be ordering three signs if approved. Two signs being requested from this
memo and the third was approved on October 18, 2022 at the Police Departments request.
RECOMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve the purchase of two radar
feedback speed limit signs.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion to approve the purchase
of two radar feedback speed limit signs for $6,370.00. This action requires a simple majority vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 44 of 238
Traffic Logix Corporation
3 Harriett Lane
Spring Valley, NY 10977 USA
Tel: (866) 915-6449
Fax: (844) 405-6449
www.trafficlogix.com
Page | 1
Quote Number QUO-24807-W7D2J3
Created Date 9/14/2022
Expiration Date 10/14/2022
Prepared by Jim Entwistle
E
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
:
1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
2
QUOTATION
Special Notes
Sourcewell pricing including freight: City of Mendota Heights ID#120096
Logix ITS 070821 LOGX
Quote Line Items – All Prices shown are in $ US Dollar
Product Product Code Quantity Sales Price Total Price
Universal Bracket (Full Set) SP1BK2 4.00000 $211.00 $844.00
SP100 English White Large with
Solar
SP100EWL-SOL 4.00000 $2,974.00 $11,896.00
Totals
Subtotal: $12,740.00
Freight: Included in price
Sales Tax (if applicable): $0.00
Grand Total: $12,740.00
Terms: 1% - 10 days – Net 30
Payment: MC, VISA, AMEX. Credit card payments over $10K will include an additional 2% fee.
Tax: IF TAX EXEMPT, Please Provide Tax Exempt Certificate with Order
Freight: Freight quotation is valid for a period of 21 days after it is issued. Beyond that, freight
quotations will require confirmation or adjustment.
Changes/Returns: 30% for standard orders and 50% on custom orders.
Delivery Requirements
Please Indicate the availability of the following as this determines the freight costs:
1. Do You have a Loading Dock? - Yes/No
Contact: John Boland
Phone: (651) 255-1155
Email: jboland@mendotaheightsmn.gov
Mendota Heights Police Department, MN
Shipping Address:
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
United States
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 45 of 238
Traffic Logix Corporation
3 Harriett Lane
Spring Valley, NY 10977 USA
Tel: (866) 915-6449
Fax: (844) 405-6449
www.trafficlogix.com
Page | 2
Quote Number QUO-24807-W7D2J3
Created Date 9/14/2022
Expiration Date 10/14/2022
Prepared by Jim Entwistle
E
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
:
1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
2
2. Do you have a Fork Lift and Pallet Jack to unload? - Yes/No
3. Can access be gained by a 53 foot truck for delivery? - Yes/No
4. Is the delivery address a Construction site? - Yes/No
5. Is the delivery address a Military site? - Yes/No
6. If shipping to Military site, is a U.S. Driver required? - Yes/No
Quote Acceptance Information
Signature _____________________________________
Name _____________________________________
Title _____________________________________
Date _____________________________________
Thank you for choosing Traffic Logix. Please sign and return to:
Please complete to set up new account: https://trafficlogix.com/business-application-form/
jentwistle@trafficlogix.com
Jim Entwistle
Regional Sales Manager
+12177411639
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 46 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approving Vacation of Private Watermain Agreement for Mendota Plaza Expansion
Second Addition
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to approve the vacation of a private watermain agreement between the Board of
Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul and Mendota Mall Associates and Mendota Plaza
Apartments.
BACKGROUND
The city of Mendota Heights approved vacating drainage and utility easements on Lot 1, Block 1,
Mendota Plaza Expansion Second Addition at their June 7, 2022 meeting. New easements have been
dedicated to encompass the revised utility layout on the property.
DISCUSSION
In addition to the Public Easement held by Mendota Heights for the drainage and utilities, Saint Paul
Regional Water Service also held a Private Watermain Agreement. The Board of Water
Commissioners for the City of Saint Paul approved to terminate the existing private watermain
agreement and entered into a new private watermain agreement.
Saint Paul Regional Water Services has sent the attached Private Watermain Agreement to the city of
Mendota Heights for approval. The Agreement includes a signatory page to be signed by the Mayor
and City Administrator for “Consent to Terminate”.
BUDGET IMPACT
Mendota Heights City Council is asked to process the Consent to Terminate page of the agreement.
There are no costs to the City of Mendota Heights to process this agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council approve the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the attached
Consent to Terminate page of the Private Watermain Agreement.
ACTION REQUIRED
Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator
to execute the Consent to Terminate the Private Watermain Agreement.
This action requires a simple majority vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 47 of 238 5j
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 48 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 49 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 50 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 51 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 52 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 53 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 54 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 55 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 56 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 57 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 58 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 59 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 60 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 61 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 62 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 63 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 64 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 65 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 66 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 67 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 68 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 69 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 70 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 71 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 72 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 73 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 74 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 75 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 76 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 77 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 78 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 79 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 80 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 81 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 82 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 83 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 84 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 85 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 86 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 87 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 88 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 89 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 90 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 91 of 238
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 92 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Final Payment and Acceptance of the Ridge Place Sanitary Sewer and
Streambank Repairs
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to approve Resolution 2022-83, to accept the work and approve the final
payment for the Ridge Place Sanitary Sewer and Streambank Repairs, Project 201612.
BACKGROUND
The City Council awarded the contract to Urban Companies at their September 23, 2021, City
Council meeting for their low bid of $367,310.00.
The contract work for project has been completed, inspected, and approved. The project is ready
for final payment. This will start the one-year guarantee period. All required paperwork needed
before the final payment can be issued has been submitted.
BUDGET IMPACT
The Ridge Place Sanitary Sewer and Streambanks repairs are financed by Sewer Utility Funds
and Storm Sewer Utility Funds and funding from the American Rescue Plan.
The final contract for the work was $407,743.25. City Council approved a change order at their
February 2, 2022 meeting to approve additional tree removal and repair of a sanitary sewer
connection ($12,923.25). The change order approval memo also identified an average of
restoration costs estimated to equal $30,310.00, the final additional restoration costs totaled
$27,510.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve the attached resolution.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution
No. 2022-83, “ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE
RIDGE PLACE SANITARY SEWER AND STREAMBANK REPAIRS” by simple majority
vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 93 of 238 5k
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-83
ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR RIDGE
PLACE SANITARY SEWER AND STREAMBANK REPAIRS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Mendota Heights on
September 23, 2021, with Urban Companies of St. Paul, MN, has satisfactorily
completed the improvements for the Ridge Place Sanitary Sewer and Streambank
Repairs, Project #201612, in accordance with such contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted
and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of
$29,507.16, taking the contractor’s receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of November,
2022.
ATTEST CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY____________________________ BY___________________________
Christine Lusian, City Clerk Stephanie Levine, Mayor
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 94 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution 2022-84 Approving the Re-execution of the Joint Powers Agreement
Establishing a Watershed Management Organization for the Lower Mississippi
River Watershed
INTRODUCTION
The Council is asked to approve Resolution 2022-84, authorizing the proper city officials to
execute a Joint Powers Agreement for the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management
Organization (LMRWMO).
BACKGROUND
The Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization was established in 1985 and
includes the cities of South Saint Paul, Inver Grove Heights, West Saint Paul, St. Paul, Sunfish
Lake, Lilydale, and Mendota Heights.
The LMRWMO has been instrumental to the city storm water management regulations, and
implementing projects and programs within the city. The LMRWMO assists in improving water
quality of the water resources within the city and provides a valuable forum for the member
cities to evaluate and resolve drainage issues within the watershed.
DISCUSSION
The re-execution of the JPA is due to the expiration of the current JPA, which forms the
organization and expires on December 31, 2022. The original JPA and amendments from the
past 20+ years were digitized from copies and combined by the LMRWMO legal counsel to
create this document. The LMRWMO then made some minor clarifying language changes and
provided all member Cities the ability to comment on those and to make their own changes.
There are not significant changes to the structure or operational duties of the LRMWMO
proposed in this JPA from the previous/existing one.
BUDGET IMPACT
Member dues are calculated based off of a percentage of the total land value and total area the
member city has within the watershed district area. Mendota Heights has the second largest land
value and the second largest acreage within the district. The annual dues to the Lower
Mississippi Watershed Management Organization from Mendota Heights is $23,178.34 for 2023.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 95 of 238 5l
Inver Grove Heights has the highest annual dues at $55,746.14 and Lilydale has the lowest at
$2,001.49.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve Resolution 2022-84 as
attached.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting
Resolution No. 2022-84, “APPROVING THE RE-EXECUTION OF THE JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
FOR THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED” by simple majority vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 96 of 238
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-84
APPROVING THE RE-EXECUTION OF THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING A WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION FOR
THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED
WHEREAS, in 1985 the City of Mendota Heights entered into a joint powers
agreement (JPA) with the Cities of South Saint Paul, Inver Grove Heights, West Saint
Paul, St. Paul, Sunfish Lake and Lilydale establishing the Lower Mississippi River
Watershed Management Organization; and
WHEREAS, the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization
implements projects and programs in partnership with its member Cities, including
Mendota Heights, to improve the water quality of the water resources within its boundary
and provides a valuable forum for the member cities to evaluate and resolve drainage
issues within the watershed; and
WHEREAS, a Revised and Restated JPA was entered into by the Cities in 2001,
which expired on December 31, 2011: and
WHEREAS, an amendment to the revised and Restated JPA was approved by the
Cities in 2011 which extended the term thereof to January 1, 2013; and
WHEREAS, a second amendment to the Revised and Restated JPA was
approved by the Cities in 2011, which extended the term thereof to January 1, 2023; and
WHEREAS, a third amendment to the Revised and Restated JPA was approved
by the Cities in 2014, which added additional land area within Mendota Heights to the
Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization; and
WHEREAS, the current JPA is set to expire on January 1, 2023 and requires re-
execution; and
WHEREAS, the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization
has combined and digitized the original JPA and amendments, clarified language with
minor edits, and propose no changes to the current structure of the organization; and
WHEREAS, the City representatives and legal councils of the seven Cities have
reviewed and approved the proposed JPA; and
WHEREAS, the City has been presented with the re-execution of the Joint
Powers Agreement Establishing a Watershed Management Organization for the Lower
Mississippi River Watershed; and
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 97 of 238
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of
Mendota Heights hereby approves the aforesaid re-execution of the JPA and authorizes
the proper City officials to execute, on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights, the “Joint
Powers Agreement Establishing the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management
Organization”.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of November,
2022.
ATTEST CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BY____________________________ BY___________________________
Christine Lusian, City Clerk Stephanie Levine, Mayor
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 98 of 238
1
221536v7
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING THE
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") are Members of the Lower
Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization and have land that drain surface water
into the Mississippi River. This Agreement combines and replaces the following documents in
their entirety: (i) the original Joint Powers Agreement that established a Watershed Management
Organization for the Lower Mississippi River which became effective in 1985; (ii) the Revised
and Restated Joint Powers Agreement executed by Member Cities in 2003; (iii) the Amendment
to the Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement which was executed in 2011; (iv) the
Second Amendment to the Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement which was executed in
2013; and (iv) the Third Amendment to the Revised and Restated Joint Powers Agreement that
was executed in 2014. This Agreement is made pursuant to the authority conferred upon the
parties by Minn. Stat. §§ 471.59 and 103B.201 - 103B.252.
SECTION 1. NAME AND LEGAL BOUNDARY. The parties hereby establish the
Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization, hereinafter referred to as the
"WMO." The "Revised Legal Boundary Map of the Lower Mississippi River Watershed
Management Organization" is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
SECTION 2. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide an organization
to regulate the natural water storage and retention of the Lower Mississippi watershed to:
A. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and ground water storage and
retention systems;
B. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water
quality problems;
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 99 of 238
2
221536v7
C. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and
ground water quality;
D. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and
ground water management;
E. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems;
F. Promote ground water recharge;
G. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational
facilities;
H. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of
surface and ground water; and
I. Carry out all the duties and responsibilities in Minn. Stat. §§ 471.59 and
103B.201 - 103B.252.
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS.
"Allowable Flow" means the rate and volume of flow, according to the design criteria set
forth in this Agreement and the Watershed Management Plan, at which a Member community
may discharge into the drainage system without financial obligation and at the rate and volume
of surface water runoff from a tributary area under natural conditions, with a drainage system in
place which has been designed and constructed according to the criteria stated herein, excluding
diverted waters. Current topographic data that exists on the enactment date of this Agreement
shall be used for the determination of the natural conditions and calculation of the allowable
flow.
"Board" means the Board of Managers of the WMO.
"Council" means the governing body of a governmental unit which is a Member of this
WMO.
"Drainage Facilities" means any improvement constructed for the conveyance or storage
of surface water.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 100 of 238
3
221536v7
"Drainage System" means the combination of drainage facilities required to safely
control or convey runoff water from a major tributary drainage area(s) to a point of final
discharge into a water body.
"Excessive Flow" means that rate and volume of flow, calculated according to the design
criteria in the Watershed Management Plan, from a Member which is in excess of the allowable
flow of that Member.
"Governmental Unit" means any city.
"Lower Mississippi River Watershed" or "Watershed" means the area contained within
the "Legal Boundary Map of the Lower Mississippi River Water Management Organization"
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
"Manager" means the representative appointed to the Board by a Member.
“Manager-Alternate or Alternate Manager” means a person appointed to the Board by a
Member to serve as a representative in the absence of the Manager.
"Member" means a governmental unit which enters into this Agreement.
"Natural Conditions" means the characteristics of the land on the date of enactment
without regard to any urban development including structures, parking lots, or other artificial
improvements.
"Rate of Flow" means the discharge of surface water runoff as a function of time which
has been calculated according the design criteria identified in the Watershed Management Plan.
The rate of flow shall apply to the design and construction of open channels and storm sewer
conduits.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 101 of 238
4
221536v7
"Volume of Flow" means the total discharge of all surface water runoff which has been
calculated according to the design criteria identified in the Watershed Management Plan. The
volume of runoff flow shall apply to the design and construction of detention facilities.
"Watershed Management Organization" or "WMO" means the organization created by
this Agreement the full name of which is "Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management
Organization." It shall be a public agency of its Members.
"Watershed Management Plan" or "Watershed Plan" means the current adopted 10 year
Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan including any subsequent amendments created by
and approved by the Board of Managers meeting the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 103B.231.
SECTION 4. MEMBERSHIP AND WEIGHTED VOTING. The Membership of the
WMO shall consist of the following governmental units, with each entitled to the following
number of eligible weighted votes:
Member Votes
City of Inver Grove Heights 3 votes
City of Lilydale 1 vote
City of Mendota Heights 2 votes
City of Saint Paul 2 votes
City of South Saint Paul 2 votes
City of Sunfish Lake 1 vote
City of West Saint Paul 2 votes
No change in governmental boundaries, structure, organizational status, or character shall
affect the eligibility of any governmental unit listed above to be represented on the WMO, so
long as such governmental unit continues to exist as a separate political subdivision. A majority
of all eligible votes shall be sufficient for all matters, unless otherwise provided for in this
Agreement. A majority vote of all Members, with each Member having one vote, shall be
required for Section 7. A Member may not cast a split vote. Any Member that fails to contribute
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 102 of 238
5
221536v7
their share of the WMO annual administration fund or their allocation of a capital improvement
cost, shall be declared ineligible for voting on all matters before the Board, until such
contribution is made to the WMO.
SECTION 5. ADVISORS.
A. Technical Advisory Committee. The following governmental
subdivisions or agencies shall be requested to appoint a non-voting advisory Member to the
WMO: Member Cities, Dakota County, Ramsey County, and Dakota County Soil and Water
Conservation District. The advisory Members shall not be required to contribute funds for the
operation of the WMO, except as provided in Minn. Stat. § 103B.231, but may provide technical
services.
B. Citizen Advisory Committee. The WMO may establish a citizen
advisory committee ("CAC") from the public at large to provide input on Watershed
Management Plan revisions and other matters as deemed appropriate. The CAC shall be
appointed by the WMO considering individuals nominated by each Member. The WMO will
notify each Member of its intent to establish a CAC, will specify the purpose and duration of the
CAC and, will request each Member to nominate candidates to be considered for appointment by
the WMO. At the time of establishment of a CAC, the WMO will appoint a chair of the CAC, a
board member liaison to the CAC, establish a time for submittal of any comments, and specify
the support the WMO will provide to the CAC.
C. Other Advisors. Each Member City may designate a non-voting staff
advisory member to the WMO Board. The Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District
(SWCD) shall designate a non-voting staff advisory member to the WMO Board.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 103 of 238
6
221536v7
SECTION 6. BOARD OF MANAGERS.
A. Appointment. The governing body of the WMO shall be its Board. Each
Member shall be entitled to appoint one Manager and an Alternate Manager on the Board,
consistent with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 103B.227. The Alternate Manager shall have the
right to vote in the absence of their Manager representative. Vacancies in the office of Manager
or Alternate Manager shall be filled for the remainder of the term by the Member which
appointed or had the right to appoint the Manager. Manager vacancies shall be filled within
ninety (90) days after they occur.
B. Eligibility or Qualification. The Council of each Member shall
determine the eligibility or qualification of its representative on the WMO.
C. Term. The Managers shall not have a fixed term, but shall serve at the
pleasure of the Member appointing such Manager to the Board.
D. Compensation. Managers shall serve without compensation from the
WMO, but this shall not prevent a Member from providing compensation for its Manager.
E. Organizational Meeting. At the first meeting of the Board each year, the
Board shall elect from its Managers a chair, a vice chair, a secretary/treasurer, and such other
officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs. The Board shall adopt rules of
order and procedures governing its meetings and affairs as it deems appropriate. The rules of
order and procedures may be amended from time to time at either a regular or a special meeting
of the Board provided that at least ten (10) days' prior notice of the proposed amendment has
been furnished to each person to whom notice of the Board meetings is required to be sent. A
majority vote of all eligible votes of the Members of the WMO shall be sufficient to adopt any
proposed amendment to such rules of order and procedure.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 104 of 238
7
221536v7
F. Annual Meeting Requirement. The Board shall meet at least annually,
at times and places selected by the Board. If the Board changes its regularly established meeting
place or time, it shall place a notice of the change on a bulletin board at least three (3) days in
advance in the building where it was scheduled to meet.
G. Committees. The Board may establish committees as it deems
appropriate.
H. Action. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, action by the
Board shall require a majority vote of the Managers present with a minimum of four (4)
Managers representing a quorum to take action and conduct business.
SECTION 7. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE WMO. The WMO, acting by its
Board:
A. Shall prepare, adopt, and implement a Watershed Management Plan
meeting the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 103B.231.
B. Shall review and approve local water management plans as provided in
Minn. Stat. § 103B.235.
C. Shall exercise the authority of a watershed district under Minn. Stat.
Chapter 103D to regulate the use and development of land in the watershed when one or more of
the following conditions exist:
1. The local government unit exercising planning and zoning authority over
the land under Minn. Stat. §§ 366.10 to 366.19, 394.21 to 394.37, or
462.351 to 462.364 does not have a local water management plan
approved and adopted in accordance with requirements of Minn. Stat.
§ 103B.235 or has not adopted the implementation program described in
the plan.
2. An application to the local government unit for a permit for the use and
development of land, requires an amendment to, or variance from, the
adopted local water management plan or implementation program of the
local unit.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 105 of 238
8
221536v7
3. The local government unit has authorized the WMO to require permits for
the use and development of land.
D. Shall adopt an annual work plan.
E. May employ such persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its duties
and powers.
F. May contract for space and for material and supplies to carry on its
activities either with a Member or elsewhere.
G. May acquire necessary personal and real property to carry out its powers
and its duties.
H. May make necessary surveys or use other reliable surveys and data, and
develop projects to accomplish the purposes for which the WMO is organized.
I. May cooperate or contract with the State of Minnesota or any subdivision
thereof or federal agency or private or public organization to accomplish the purposes for which
it is organized.
J. May order any governmental unit to carry out the local water management
plan which has been approved by the Board, or if the local unit of government fails to do so, in
addition to other remedies, in its discretion, the Board may implement any required action or
improvement in accordance with this Agreement.
K. May acquire, operate, construct, and maintain the capital improvements
delineated in the Watershed Management Plan adopted by the Board.
L. May contract for or purchase such insurance as the Board deems necessary
for the protection of the WMO and its Board.
M. May establish and maintain devices for acquiring and recording
hydrological and water quality data within the watershed area of the WMO.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 106 of 238
9
221536v7
N. May enter upon private lands within or outside and adjacent to the legal
boundary of the watershed with the consent of the landowner to make surveys and investigations
to accomplish the purposes of the WMO.
O. May provide any Member with technical data or any other information of
which the WMO has knowledge which will assist the Member in preparing land use
classifications or local water management plans within the WMO, or in other water resources
related to the functions of the WMO.
P. May provide legal and technical assistance in connection with litigation or
other proceedings between one or more of its Members and any other political subdivision,
commission, board, corporation, individual, or agency relating to the planning or construction of
facilities to drain or pond storm waters or relating to the powers and duties of the WMO.
Q. May accumulate reserve funds for the purposes herein mentioned and may
invest funds of the WMO not currently needed for its operations.
R. May collect money, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement,
from its Members and from any other source approved by the Board.
S. May make contracts, incur expenses, and make expenditures necessary
and incidental to the effectuation of its purposes and powers.
T. Shall cause to be made an annual audit of the books and accounts of the
WMO and shall make and file a report to its Members at least once each year including the
following information:
1. The financial condition of the WMO;
2. The status of all WMO projects and work within the watershed;
and
3. The business transacted by the WMO and other matters which
affect the interests of the WMO. Copies of the report shall be
transmitted to each Member by June 30 of each year.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 107 of 238
10
221536v7
U. Shall make the WMO's books, reports, and records available for and open
to inspection by its Members or the public at all reasonable times.
V. May recommend changes in this Agreement to its Members. Any
amendments shall require ratification by all parties to this Agreement.
W. May exercise all other powers necessary and incidental to the
implementation of the purposes and powers set forth herein and as authorized by Minn. Stat.
§§ 103B.201 through 103B.252.
X. Must solicit proposals for all legal, engineering, auditing, and other
technical services in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.227, subd. 5.
Y. Shall coordinate its planning activities with contiguous watershed
management organizations and counties conducting water planning and implementation under
Minn. Stat. Chapter 103B.
Z. Shall designate one or more legal newspapers of general circulation which
are published in the county(ies) in which the watershed is located.
SECTION 8. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICERS OF THE BOARD.
A. It shall be the duty of the Chair of the Board to:
1. Attend and preside at all meetings of the Board;
2. Assist in the preparation of meeting agendas and the annual work
plan;
3. See that orders and resolutions of the Board are carried into effect;
4. Sign and execute documents as may be required for the Board's
exercise of its powers, except as otherwise required by law; and
5. Perform such other duties applicable to the office as are necessary
to fulfill the powers and duties of the Board as set forth in this
Agreement, and as provided by law.
B. It shall be the duty of the Vice Chair of the Board to:
1. Perform the duties of the Chair in the Chair's absence; and
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 108 of 238
11
221536v7
2. Perform other duties as assigned from time to time by the Board.
C. It shall be the duty of the Secretary/Treasurer of the Board to:
1. Keep and post a true and accurate record of the proceedings of all
meetings of the Board;
2. Keep a record of all amendments, alterations and additions to this
Agreement;
3. Prepare and process all correspondence;
4. Prepare and file all reports and statements as required by law and
this Agreement;
5. Keep all financial accounts of the WMO, and prepare and present
to the Board full and detailed financial statements of the WMO
prior to its annual meeting; and
6. Perform other duties as assigned from time to time by the Board.
The Board may delegate powers and duties of the Officers to WMO staff as
necessary to accomplish the work of the WMO.
SECTION 9. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS.
A. Capital Improvement Projects. All construction, reconstruction,
extension, or maintenance of WMO improvements, including outlets, lift stations, dams,
reservoirs, or appurtenances of a surface water or storm sewer system ordered by the WMO
which involve potential construction by and assessment against any Member or against privately
or publicly owned land within the watershed shall adhere to the following procedures set forth in
this section. The Board shall secure from its engineers or some other competent person a
preliminary report advising it whether the proposed improvement is feasible, whether there are
feasible alternatives, whether the proposed improvement shall best be made as proposed or in
conjunction with some other improvement, a determination of the quantity and/or quality of
storm and surface water contributed to the improvement by each Member, the estimated cost of
the improvement(s), including maintenance, the estimated cost to each Member, and evaluating
the consistency of the improvement with the Watershed Management Plan capital improvement
section. The Board shall then hold a public hearing on the proposed improvement. Notice of the
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 109 of 238
12
221536v7
hearing shall be mailed to the clerk of each affected Member and shall also be published in the
Board's official newspaper(s). The notice shall be mailed not less than forty-five (45) days before
the hearing, shall state the time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement,
the estimated total cost, and the estimated cost to each Member.
To order the improvement, a resolution setting forth the order shall require a
favorable majority vote of all eligible votes of the Members of the WMO. The order shall
describe the improvement, shall allocate in percentages the cost allocation among the Members,
shall determine the method of financing, shall designate the engineers to prepare plans and
specifications, and shall designate the entity that will contract for the improvement. The Board
shall not order and no engineer shall prepare plans and specification before the Board has
adopted a resolution ordering the improvement. After the Board has ordered an improvement, it
shall forward the preliminary report to all affected Members with an estimated time schedule for
the construction of the improvement.
The Board shall allow not less than 90 days, nor more than 270 days, for each
Member to conduct hearings as provided by law or applicable charter requirements, to approve
the construction and the method of financing of the improvement which the Member will use to
pay its proportionate share of the costs of the improvement.
If the WMO proposes to use Dakota County's and/or Ramsey County's bonding
authority, or if the WMO proposes to certify all or any part of an improvement to Dakota and/or
Ramsey County for payment, then and in that event all proceedings shall be carried out in
accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.251.
The Board may order advertising for bids upon receipt of notice from each
Member which will be assessed that it has completed its hearing or determined its method of
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 110 of 238
13
221536v7
payment, or upon expiration of 270 days after the mailing of the preliminary report to the
Members, whichever occurs first.
B. Appeal. Any Member aggrieved by the determination of the Board as to
the financing of an improvement or allocation of the costs of an improvement shall have thirty
(30) days after the WMO resolution ordering the improvement to appeal the determination to
arbitration. The appeal shall be in writing requesting the arbitration and shall be addressed to the
Board in c/o City of South St. Paul, 125 3rd Ave. N., South St. Paul, MN 55075. The
determination of the Member's appeal shall be referred to a Board of Arbitration. The Board of
Arbitration shall consist of three (3) persons: one to be appointed by the Board, one to be
appointed by the appealing Member, and the third to be appointed by the two so selected. In the
event the two persons so selected do not appoint the third person within fifteen (15) days after
their appointment, then the chief judge of the District Court of Dakota County shall have
jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either or both of the two earlier selected, the third
person to the Board of Arbitration. The third person selected shall not be a resident of any
Member and if appointed by the chief judge, shall be a person knowledgeable in the subject
matter of the dispute. The arbitrators' expenses and fees, together with the other expenses, not
including counsel fees, incurred in the conduct of the arbitration shall be divided equally
between the WMO and the appealing Member. Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with
the Uniform Arbitration Act, Minn. Stat. Chapter 572. Arbitration must be completed within the
270 day period provided for in paragraph A of this Section.
C. Contracts for Improvements. The bidding and contracting of the work
may be let by any Member or by the WMO as determined by the Board, in compliance with state
statutes. Contracts and bidding procedures shall comply with all legal requirements.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 111 of 238
14
221536v7
D. Supervision. All improvement contracts shall be supervised by the entity
awarding the contract. A WMO representative shall also be authorized to observe and review the
work in progress and the Members agree to cooperate with the WMO representative in
accomplishing the WMO's purposes. Representatives of the WMO shall have the right to enter
upon the place or places where the improvement work is in progress for the purpose of making
reasonable tests and inspections. The WMO representative shall report to the Board on the
progress of the work.
E. Land Acquisition. The WMO shall not have the power of eminent
domain. All easements or interest in land which are necessary for an improvement will be
negotiated or condemned in accordance with Minn. Stat. Chapter 117 by the Member where the
land is located, and each Member agrees to acquire the necessary easement or right-of-way or
partial or complete interest in land upon order of the Board to accomplish the purposes of this
Agreement. All reasonable costs of the acquisition, including attorney's and appraiser's fees,
shall be a cost of the improvement, and shall be allocated according to the formula for allocating
Capital Improvement cost in Section 10, paragraph G. If a Member determines it is in its best
interest to acquire additional rights in lands for some other purposes, in conjunction with the
taking of lands for the improvement, the costs of the acquisition of additional rights in lands will
not be included in the improvement costs. The Board, in determining the amount of the
improvement costs to be assessed to each Member, may take into consideration the land use for
which the additional lands are being acquired and may credit the acquiring Member for the land
acquisition to the extent that it benefits the other Members. Any credits may be applied to the
cost allocation of the improvement, or the Board, if feasible and necessary, may defer the credits
to a future improvement.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 112 of 238
15
221536v7
Members may not condemn or negotiate for land acquisition to pond or drain
storm and surface waters within the corporate boundaries of another Member within the WMO.
SECTION 10. FINANCES.
A. Disbursements. The WMO funds may be expended by the Board in
accordance with this Agreement in a manner determined by the Board. The Board shall designate
one or more national or state bank or trust companies authorized to receive deposits of public
monies to act as depositories for the WMO funds. In no event shall there be a disbursement of
WMO funds without approval by the Board and the signature of at least two (2) Board Members,
one of whom shall be an officer. The Board may require the secretary/treasurer to file with the
Board a bond in the sum of at least $10,000 or such higher amount as shall be determined by the
Board. The WMO shall pay the premium on said bond.
B. Budget. On or before July 1 of each year, the Board shall adopt a general
fund budget ("Budget") by a majority vote of all Members (with each Member having one vote)
for the ensuing year and decide upon the total amount necessary for the general fund. The
secretary/treasurer of the Board shall certify the Budget to the clerk of each Member, together
with a statement of the proportion of the Budget to be provided by each Member, computed in
accordance with Section 10, paragraph E. The council of each Member shall review the Budget,
and the Board shall upon notice from any Member received prior to August 1, hear objections to
the Budget, and may, upon notice to all Members of the time, date, place of and right to
participate in the hearing and after a hearing, modify or amend the Budget, and then give notice
to the Members of any and all modifications or amendments. Each Member agrees to provide the
funds required by the Budget by February 15 of each year.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 113 of 238
16
221536v7
If a Member fails to provide its share of the funds required by the Budget by
February 15 of each year, the unpaid balance of the funds shall accrue interest at a rate of eight
percent (8%) per annum commencing the day following February 15 of the year in which the
funds were due. The WMO may take whatever action, at law or in equity, it deems appropriate
to collect any amounts due from a Member under this Agreement. The Member agrees to pay
the cost of collection.
C. Maintenance. The Board shall have the option of funding maintenance
work through the Budget, or funding as a capital improvement in accordance with paragraph F of
this Section. Maintenance costs that are associated with an improvement in the approved Capital
Improvement Program shall be allocated according to the same formula as is applicable for
allocating capital improvement costs as identified in Section 10, paragraph G. The Members
affected by the improvement shall decide on the level of maintenance to be applied to the
improvement. If the Members cannot agree, the Board shall make the determination.
D. Tax Levy. If authorized by law, the WMO may levy a tax. The proceeds
of any tax levied under this paragraph shall be expended only for the purposes authorized by law.
The WMO may accumulate the proceeds of levies as an alternative to issuing bonds to finance
improvements.
E. General Fund. Each Member agrees to contribute each year to a general
fund to be used for general administration purposes including, but not limited to: improvement
projects, salaries, rent, supplies, development of an overall plan, insurance, bonds, and to
purchase and maintain devices to measure hydrological and water quality data. The funds may
also be used for any other purpose authorized by this Agreement. The annual contribution by
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 114 of 238
17
221536v7
each Member shall be based fifty percent (50%) on taxable market value (for the preceding year)
and fifty percent (50%) on area in accordance with the following formula:
Annual Watershed Levy = L
Taxable Market Value of a Member's Property in the Watershed = MV
Taxable Market Value of All Property in the Watershed = TV
Acres of Property a Member Has in the Watershed = A
Total Acres in Watershed = TA
Member Required Contribution = C
½ L x MV + ½ L x A = C
TV TA
F. Capital Improvement.
1. All capital improvements ordered by the Board must be included in
the WMO's adopted capital improvement program. An
improvement fund shall be established for each improvement
ordered by the WMO. If ordered by the Board, each Member
agrees to contribute to the funds its proportionate share of the
engineering, legal, and administrative costs as determined by the
amount to be assessed against each Member as a cost of the
improvement. The Board shall submit in writing a statement to
each Member, setting forth in detail the expenses incurred by the
WMO for each improvement.
Each Member further agrees to pay its proportionate share of the
cost of the improvement in accordance with the determination of
the Board, under Section 10, paragraph G, H, or I. The Board or
the Member awarding the contract shall submit in writing copies of
the engineer's certificate authorizing payment during construction
and the Member being billed agrees to pay its share of the costs
within thirty (30) days after receipt of the statement. The Board
may also require payment from Members before awarding a
contract based upon an engineer's estimate of cost. Billings will
then be adjusted when actual costs are known. The Board or the
Member awarding the contract shall advise other contributing
Members of the tentative time schedule of the work and the
estimated times when the contributions shall be necessary.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 115 of 238
18
221536v7
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph F(1) above, of the
Capital Improvements, the WMO may also fund all or any part of
the cost of a capital improvement contained in the capital
improvement program of the plan in accordance with Minn. Stat.
§ 103B.251. The WMO and Dakota County and/or Ramsey
County may establish a maintenance fund to be used for normal
and routine maintenance of an improvement constructed in whole
or in part with money provided by Dakota and/or Ramsey County
pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103B.251. The levy and collection of an
ad valorem tax levy for maintenance shall be by Dakota and/or
Ramsey County based upon a tax levy resolution adopted by the
WMO and remitted to the county(ies) on or before October 1 of
each year. If it is determined to levy for maintenance, the WMO
shall be required to follow the hearing process established by
Minn. Stat. § 103D.921. Mailed notice shall also be sent to the
clerk of each Member at least thirty (30) days prior to the hearing.
3. The WMO may also fund all or any part of the cost of a capital
improvement contained in the capital improvement program of the
plan in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.241.
G. Capital Cost Allocation of Improvements in the Board's Watershed
Management Plan. All capital improvement costs of improvements designated in the WMO's
adopted watershed management plan for construction by the WMO pursuant to Section 10,
paragraph F(1) of this Agreement shall be apportioned by the following methods or a
combination of these methods:
1. For improvements related to water quantity:
a. A Member shall be responsible for the costs of construction
of that portion of a drainage system that is located within
its borders and that is necessary to accommodate its
Allowable Flow and the Allowable Flow of all other
tributary Members.
b. A Member shall also be responsible for its share of
construction costs of a drainage system, whether or not that
system is located within its borders that is necessary to
convey Excessive Flows originating within the Member's
borders.
c. Increased costs of construction incurred for acquisition of
lands, easements and rights of way within natural
watercourses shall be the obligation of the Member in
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 116 of 238
19
221536v7
which the land lies and shall not be apportioned to other
Members to the extent that such costs exceed costs which
would have been incurred if there had been no
improvement on such lands, easements, or rights of way.
d. Costs of construction shall include all costs associated with
a WMO approved improvement (whether trunk sewer or
natural conveyance) and whether or not actually
constructed, including, but not limited to, costs for design,
administration, construction supervision, legal fees,
acquisition of lands and improvements and actual
construction and maintenance costs.
e. The WMO shall consider any grant money received or to
be received by a Member for sanitary sewer/storm sewer
separation or for the construction, reconstruction or
replacement of storm sewer facilities before making cost
allocations among Members and may consider the
application of any grant proceeds toward the cost of the
improvement before allocating costs between or among the
Members involved, provided that such allocation would not
violate the terms and conditions of the grant.
f. For water quantity projects and maintenance, the cost
sharing will be based on the cost allocation methods in the
attached Exhibit “B” incorporated by reference and
serving as a compilation of general examples of cost
allocations under this Agreement for hypothetical
circumstances stated in the examples.
g. Members may enter into individual joint powers
agreements with one another for mutually agreed upon cost
allocations for water quantity projects and maintenance as
an alternative to those outlined in Exhibit “B”.
2. For improvements related to water quality:
a. For water quality projects and maintenance, the cost
sharing will be based on the cost allocation methods in the
attached Exhibit “C” incorporated by reference.
b. Members may enter into individual joint powers
agreements with one another for mutually agreed upon cost
allocations for water quality projects and maintenance as an
alternative to those outlined in Exhibit “C”.
c. Other cost sharing method approved by the Board.
d. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103B.251.
H. Capital Cost Allocation of Improvements Delineated in Local
Watershed Management Plans. All capital improvement costs incurred by the WMO for
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 117 of 238
20
221536v7
improvements delineated in local watershed management plans that benefit only that Member,
which the WMO undertakes because the Member fails to do so, shall be apportioned entirely to
that Member.
I. Other Cost Allocations. Members may enter into individual joint powers
agreements with one another for mutually agreed upon cost allocations for capital improvement
projects as an alternative to using the methods outlined in this agreement.
SECTION 11. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. The WMO shall not have the power to
levy special assessments. All such assessments shall be levied by the Member within which the
land is located.
SECTION 12. DURATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the written
agreement of a majority of the Members or pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103B.221.
SECTION 13. DISSOLUTION. Upon dissolution of the WMO or termination of this
Agreement, all property of the WMO shall be sold and the proceeds thereof, together with
monies on hand, shall be distributed to the Members. Such distribution of WMO assets shall be
made in proportion to the total contribution to the WMO required by the last annual Budget.
SECTION 14. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect
when all seven (7) Members file a certified copy of a resolution approving this Agreement and
have executed this Agreement and filed the executed Agreement with the Board. All Members
need not sign the same copy.
SECTION 15. COUNTERPARTS. The parties may sign this Agreement in
counterparts, each of which constitutes an original but all of which together constitute one
instrument.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 118 of 238
21
221536v7
SECTION 16. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The parties agree that the electronic
signature of a party to this Agreement be valid as an original signature of such party and shall be
effective to bind such party to this Agreement. The parties further agree that any document
(including this Agreement and any attachments or exhibits to this Agreement) containing, or to
which there is affixed, an electronic signature shall be deemed (i) to be “written” or “in writing,”
(ii) to have been signed, and (iii) to constitute a record established and maintained in the ordinary
course of business and an original written when printed from electronic files. For purposes
hereof, “electronic signature” also means a manually signed original signature that is then
transmitted by any electronic means, including without limitation a faxed version of an original
signature or an electronically scanned and transmitted version (e.g. via PDF) of an original
signature. Any party’s failure to produce the original signature of any electronically transmitted
signature shall not affect the enforceability of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units, by action of their
governing bodies, have caused this Agreement to be executed in accordance with the authority of
Minn. Stat. § 471.59.
Remainder of page intentionally left blank.
Signature pages follow.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 119 of 238
22
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
__________________, 20____.
By: _______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 120 of 238
23
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF LILYDALE
__________________, 20____.
By: _______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 121 of 238
24
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
__________________, 20____.
By: ________________________________
Attest: _____________________________
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 122 of 238
25
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF ST. PAUL
____________________, 20____.
By: ______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
By: ______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
By: ______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
Approved as to Form:
By:
Assistant City Attorney
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 123 of 238
26
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL
____________________, 20____.
By: _______________________________
Attest: _____________________________
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 124 of 238
27
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE
____________________, 20____.
By: ________________________________
Attest: _____________________________
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 125 of 238
28
221536v7
Approved by the City Council CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL
____________________, 20____.
By: ________________________________
Its Mayor
By: ________________________________
Its City Manager
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 126 of 238
29
221536v7
EXHIBIT “A”
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 127 of 238
30
221536v7
EXHIBIT “B”
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 128 of 238
31
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 129 of 238
32
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 130 of 238
33
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 131 of 238
34
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 132 of 238
35
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 133 of 238
36
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 134 of 238
37
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 135 of 238
38
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 136 of 238
39
221536v7
EXHIBIT “C”
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 137 of 238
40
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 138 of 238
41
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 139 of 238
42
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 140 of 238
43
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 141 of 238
44
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 142 of 238
45
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 143 of 238
46
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 144 of 238
47
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 145 of 238
48
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 146 of 238
49
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 147 of 238
50
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 148 of 238
51
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 149 of 238
52
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 150 of 238
53
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 151 of 238
54
221536v7
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 152 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Christine Lusian, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Massage Therapist License
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to approve a new massage therapist license.
BACKGROUND
Massage therapist applicant, Nikita Rae Schanzenbach, has completed application requirements,
paid the associated license fees, and secured employment at licensed massage establishment
Hush Therapeutic Massage.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends the Council approve a massage therapist license for Nikita Rae
Schanzenbach effective through June 30, 2023.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 153 of 238 5m
This page intentionally left blank.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 154 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 155 of 2385n
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 156 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 157 of 2385o
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 158 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 159 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 160 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 161 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 162 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 163 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 164 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 165 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 166 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 167 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 168 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 169 of 238
This page intentionally left blank.City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 170 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Accepting City-Wide Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to accept the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan.
BACKGROUND
City Council awarded a professional services contract to HKGi at their February 15, 2022
meeting for development of a city-wide Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. This plan is funded
through a grant from Minnesota Department of Health’s State-Wide Health Improvement
Partnership (SHIP) administered through the Dakota County Public Health Department.
DISCUSSION
The city is developing a comprehensive plan for recommendations and improvements to bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. The planning process included evaluating where current trails,
sidewalks, and on-street facilities are located and where there are gaps and barriers to bicycle and
pedestrian movement throughout the city. Dakota County also owns and maintains regional trails
in the city to provide non-motorized connections within and outside the community. The final
plan will aim to identify strategies to increase access to and participation in bicycling and
walking throughout the community, as well as identifying and prioritizing physical
improvements that will make the system safer and more connected.
The benefits of improving walking and biking capabilities within the community are many.
Walking, bicycling, and other non-auto modes of transportation are less expensive; especially
with rising gas prices and the cost of vehicle ownership. Additionally, connecting and improving
routes expands accessibility for those who may not be able to drive a vehicle, improves overall
community health and wellness, and provides environmental benefits.
In the first phase of input, people were asked how they use existing bike and pedestrian facilities
in the city and what improvements they would like to see in the system. People could respond to
a survey questionnaire and also to an interactive mapping tool where they could list open-ended
comments.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 171 of 238 7a
Almost 300 people responded to the survey and almost 70 people left 183 comments on the
interactive map. Many people also “liked” or “disliked” the map comments, which provided a
list of popular comments.
Most of the feedback received in the first phase of engagement related to safety of bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. Many people identified a desire for multi-use trails separated from roads
rather than on-street facilities, especially along Dodd Road. People also mentioned a desire to
make trail connections and improve safe crossings of busy roadways.
During the second phase of engagement, a series of issues and opportunities for the bike and ped
system were presented on an interactive map and people were asked to comment on which
opportunities they see as the highest priorities.
A State Health Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grant is being used to fund the project process,
which supports improvements for seniors, children, low-income populations, and those who may
be experiencing a health disparity. Strategies and initiatives in the plan will focus on
improvements that include education, encouragement, enforcement, evaluation, equity, and
engineering.
The city consultant, HKGi, will be giving the council a presentation on the plan.
Supported by the Statewide Health Improvement Partnership, Minnesota Department of Health
and the Dakota County Public Health Department.
BUDGET
The SHIP grant amount was $30,000 and required a local match of $6,000 funded through the
general fund. Implementation of the plan will require additional funds which will be identified
and added to the Capital Improvement Plan as feasible.
RECOMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council accept the Bike and Pedestrian Master
Plan.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion to accept the Bike
and Pedestrian Master Plan. This requires a simple majority vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 172 of 238
DRAFT
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
October 27, 2022
Pedestrian Plan&Bike
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 173 of 238
ii MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
01 INTRODUCTION 1
Project Purpose 1
Importance and Value of a
Connected Bicycle & Pedestrian
System 2
Project Process 3
Public Engagement 4
02 ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES 10
Summary of Related Planning 10
Existing Conditions 14
Issues & Opportunities 16
03 RECOMMENDATIONS 22
Plan Strategies & Organization 22
Education 23
Engineering 24
Encouragement 36
Enforcement 37
Equity 38
Experience 39
Ethics 40
Evaluation 41
04 IMPLEMENTATION 42
Project priorities 42
Implementation Strategies &
Funding Sources 47
CONTENTS
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 174 of 238
1 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT PURPOSE
WHAT IS A BIKE & PEDESTRIAN PLAN?
A Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan looks at existing facilities, evaluates
issues and opportunities within the system, and identifies plans for future
investments in the system.
In early 2022, the city received a grant through the Statewide Health
Improvement Partnership (SHIP) from the Minnesota Department of
Health and Dakota County in order to develop a plan for bicycling and
walking improvements in the community. The master plan will be used to
guide decision-making regarding future investments in and prioritization
of improvements to the bike and pedestrian system, will provide a
foundation for seeking funding assistance for improvements, and aims to
result in a more bikeable and walkable Mendota Heights.
INCLUDE THE 6E’S:
EVALUATION, EDUCATION,
ENGINEERING,
ENCOURAGEMENT,
ENFORCEMENT, AND
EQUITY IN THE PLAN
PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT
OF AN INTERCONNECTED
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
SYSTEM CITY-WIDE
INTEGRATE COUNTY
GREENWAYS AND TRAILS
ALONG COUNTY HIGHWAYS
INTO THE SYSTEM
E
E
E
E
E
E
PLAN PURPOSE AND GOALS
• Plan for development of an interconnected pedestrian and bicycle system city-wide
• Integrate County Greenways and trails along County Highways into the system
• Include the 6 E’s: Evaluation, Education, Engineering, Encouragement, Engagement, and Equity in the plan
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 175 of 238
2 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & RECREATION
Trails for walking, biking, and rolling offer access to a variety of
urban and natural environments. Destination trails bring people into
communities for leisure and recreation opportunities and enhance the
local economy.
SUSTAINABILITY
Walking, biking and rolling are simple, cost-effective ways of being
active. Walking is an essential part of all journeys. It is accessible and
affordable, and socially equitable. Cycling is among the most efficient
and sustainable means of transportation. Together, walking, biking and
rolling have economic, social, environmental and health benefits.
HEALTH & COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE
Walking, biking, and rolling allow people to experience the outdoors,
see others’ faces, promotes community engagement and connections,
and encourages active living and healthy lifestyles.
ECONOMICS & COST
Bicycling and walking are less expensive than driving, take up less space
on roads, and require less area to park at destinations.
Bikes and feet create less wear and tear on roads and trails than motor
vehicles; long-term this costs taxpayers less money for maintenance and
repair.INTRODUCTIONIMPORTANCE AND VALUE OF A CONNECTED
BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM
In addition to providing necessary transportation infrastructure for multiple non-motorized modes
of transportation, a connected bicycle and pedestrian system provides other supplemental benefits
for the community.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 176 of 238
3 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
TASK 1
Organize the Effort
TASK 2
Inventory and Analysis
TASK 3
Plan & System Recommendations
TASK 4
Final Plan and Approvals
PROJECT PROCESS
The project kicked off in March, 2022, and held two phases of public
engagement--one in the spring and one in the late summer. Stakeholder
meetings were held in the fall of 2022, and meetings with the Advisory Park
and Recreation Commission, Advisory Planing Commission, and the City
Council were held in August, September, and October.
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOVMAR
Survey #1 Survey #2
City Staff Meetings
Listening Sessions
Community Survey
Community Open House
Advisory Park and Rec Commission
Advisory Planning Commission
City Council
Existing multi-use trailExisting crosswalk
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 177 of 238
4 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTPUBLIC ENGAGEMENTPHASE 1 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
In the first phase of input, people were asked how they use existing bike and pedestrian facilities in the
city and what improvements they would like to see in the system. People could respond to a survey
questionnaire and also to an interactive mapping tool where they could list open-ended comments.
Almost 300 people responded to the survey and almost 70 people left 183 comments on the interactive
map. Many people also “liked” or “disliked” the map comments, which provided a list of popular
comments.
Most of the feedback received in the first phase of engagement related to safety of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. Many people identified a desire for multi-use trails separated from roads rather than on-street
facilities, especially along Dodd Road. People also mentioned a desire to make trail connections and
improve safe crossings of busy roadways.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
At the onset of the project process, a Community Engagement Plan was developed to describe the goals, audiences,
methods, and phases for community engagement during the project. The objectives of the engagement process included:
• Provide project information to the public, especially residents of Mendota Heights
• Solicit and obtain feedback from the public and stakeholders for potential improvements and additions to bike and pedestrian
facilities in the city
• Engage the public and stakeholders to comment on issues and opportunities related to priorities for implementation
• Discover potential partners that may be involved with project implementation
• Reach out to and respond to the needs of SHIP priority populations: people 60 or older, children, and people with low incomes
or others experiencing a health disparity
SHIP PRIORITY POPULATIONS
During the process, project team members used methods to reach out to SHIP priority populations: outreach to all schools
in the city with a request for engagement in the process; project information posting in city newsletters and mailers; a
meeting was held with the Thompson Park Activity Center Advisory Council; a booth was set up at the city’s Community
Open House.
The plan identifies the need for connected, off-road facilities throughout the entire community, especially in areas where
there are schools and retail areas. These areas are most in need of safe, non-motorized access. Safe roadway crossings were
a highly mentioned element throughout the engagement process and especially for those who identify as SHIP priority
populations.
The public engagement process included two phases of outreach and engagement as described in the table below.
PHASE PURPOSE/GOALS OUTREACH METHODS INPUT METHODS RESULTS
Phase 1:
April 2022
Inform residents of the
project; Solicit broad input
on how people bike and
walk in the city today and
what issues or desires they
have for the system
City website info; social media;
press release; postcard
Survey Monkey
questionnaire; Social
Pinpoint interactive map
297 survey
responses
Phase 2:
August-
September,
2022
Seek input on draft
opportunities
City website info; social media
posts; Community Open House;
Friday news; OneTen Cycles; Park
Commission meeting; Planning
Commission meeting; City
Council work session
Social Pinpoint interactive
map; Thompson Park
Activity Center Advisory
Council meeting; Visitation
High School student
meeting
105 map
comments
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 178 of 238
5 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
k
o
l
q
g
m
n
p
e
hdb
f
j
i
c
a
(i)“Make trail connection from Trail Rd to Wachtler to make it easier to go N/S by bike and foot through the community.”
PHASE 1 SOCIAL PINPOINT MAP
SUMMARY
PARTICIPATION
X This works well X This needs improvement X This is a barrier X Ideas and suggestions
(q)“It would be really great if there was a small path connecting Hampshire Dr. street to the existing path at Hagstrom park. That way kids and others would not have to go through a parking lot on bikes, or make essentially a u-turn around on the edge of busy Mendota Heights road (causing cars to slow and stop thinking the crosswalk is used when it really isn’t).”
(p)“This pedestrian island is an important piece of infrastructure for pedestrian safety. The problem is that motorists on Dodd seem to struggle with it. Additional crossing lights or signage would help.”
(l)“The vehicle turn lanes at the Dodd /Marie intersection force pedestrians into the travel lanes.”(m)“Bike/ped path simply ends with no good place to divert cyclists or pedestrians other than right on to Dodd. Dangerous and unpleasant.”
(n)“The tunnel is a fantastic connection for the northern and southern half of MH. I use it regularly when jogging and cycling.”(o)“This crosswalk is not well marked. Additional signage is needed.”
COMMENT TRENDS
• Comments are at odds about bike and pedestrian facilities along Dodd Road. Many state it’s too busy and dangerous of a road to add facilities and will inconvenience current residents and vehicles. Those in favor say Dodd could act as a great connection to surrounding trails and destinations if done safely.• More safe connections needed for kids traveling to schools -add more lights and ped signage, address crosswalk gaps, traffic calming needed.• Better trail maintenance - replace/fix poor pavement, be more conscientious about snow removal and placement.• Wide shoulders are used by school athletic teams, bike clubs, runners, and families - need more infrastructure/design to make them safe.• There are limited locations to safety cross the larger, higher-use roadways These larger barriers discourage users from exploring surrounding parks and trails. • More connections from neighborhoods to parks and outdoor recreation points like sledding hills and athletic fields for families and students.• Users appreciate amenities like bike repair stations, trash cans, and seating. More wayfinding signage is desired.
TOTAL SITE VISITS879
UNIQUE USERS305
UNIQUE STAKEHOLDERS68
COMMENTS183
(a)“Bike path ends here at a steep hill with narrow shoulders.”
(b)“Please add a path/sidewalk along Dodd!”
(c)“Crossing this freeway requires 4(!) crossings with “beg buttons” and long waits at signals. Cars often do not stop or look when turning right. Debris on road. Uncovered expansion joints make the bridge treacherous for bikes.”
(d)“The pedestrian path here is awkward and kind of just ends. I tend not to use it as a result.”
3
(e)“Well done on the new pedestrian crossing with the flashing lights.”(f)“Upon entering Bachelor Ave from Dodd there is a 30 MPH Speed Limit sign. 30 is way too high for a residential street, and since it’s a straightaway, motorists often speed. I suggest removing the sign (easy fix which would then imply a 25 MPH speed limit) and even better would be to add speed bumps. Pedestrians and kids are often put in danger by speeders on Bachelor.”
(g)“Shift the travel lanes east, and reduce to 11 feet. Then add removable bollards on the west side of the road to create a ped/bike lane, separated from the travel lanes. No road reconstruction needed.”
(h)“Dodd Rd is really unsafe for bicyclists. I worry when I see kids biking on the shoulder and tons of traffic/speeding cars.”
(j)“I don’t see how Dodd (between Smith and 62) can be called a local trail. There are no sidewalks or bike lanes, only a narrow shoulder really. It is unsafe for bicyclists. Need to reduce speed limit, add stop signs, and add protected bike lanes to improve safety.”
(k)“Dodd needs a sidewalk all the way to 62. Kids walk and bike here, unsafely, all the time.”
9
34
15
8
14
27
37
24
28
27
19
25
14
9
11
7
POPULAR
COMMENTS:
The following
comments are
a representative
display of over 180
comments.
#= Number
of Likes
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 179 of 238
6 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTPUBLIC ENGAGEMENTPARTICIPANT DEMOGRAPHICS
What is your age? (297 Responses)
17 years or younger
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75 years or older
0.7%0.3%
3%
30%
21%
20%
19%
6%
How do you identify your gender? (297 Responses)Do you experience disabilities that affect your
comfort with walking or biking? (297 Responses)
How do you describe your ethnic or cultural
heritage? (297 Responses)
Male Female
35%64%
PREFER
NOT TO
SAY
1%
White/European
American
Black/African American
Asian/Asian American
Native American
Hispanic or Latino
Other
92%
94%
No, I do not experience
disabilities
Yes, I experience other
disabilities
I use a mobility aid, such
as crutches, a walker, or a
wheelchair
I am hearing impaired
I am seeing impaired
3%2%1%
Which of the following
best describes your
association with Mendota
Heights?
(297 Responses)
I live in the
City
I work in the
City
I go to school in
the CityI visit the City Other
During the warmer months of the year, how often do you walk or bike for the following reasons?
(297 Responses)
1%91%1%5%2%
For exercise For pleasure/recreation To visit friends/relatives
To go shopping/run
errands To go to restaurants
and/or bars
To go to cultural, religious, or
community eventsTo go to work To go to school
5+
Times
Per
Week
2-3
Times
Per
Week
Once A
Week
Never
To connect with public
transportation
52%35%
11%
2%
44%
40%
13%
3%
6%
22%
32%
40%
7%
27%
65%
1%
6.5%
33%60%
0.5%
7%
2%
5%
86%
3%3%3%
91%
1%1%
98%
2%
13%
85%
1%
1%
0.3%
0.7%
5%
The survey was open online during the month of April, 2022, and there were 297 responses submitted.
PHASE 1 SURVEY SUMMARY
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 180 of 238
7 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
“More bike lanes on roadways,
especially on the roads directly
connected to schools.”
What are the most important destinations to
walk or bike to? (297 Responses)
Parks and trails
Shopping, dining, and
entertainment
67%
Schools
Residential areas
Other
Places to work
Transit stops or stations
Community or civic
buildings
9.5%
8%
6%
6%
2%
1%
0.5%
Based on the descriptions about how often you walk or bike
during warmer months , how would you characterize your attitude
towards biking? (297 Responses)
What keeps you from walking or biking in Mendota Heights?
(258 Responses) (All that applied selected)
How important are each of the following to you when
planning for the future bicycle and pedestrian network?
(297 Responses)
Please share any ideas you have for
improving conditions for biking and walking
in Mendota Heights:
(207 Responses Received)
I don’t feel safe
walking or biking
near motorized
traffic
Trails and
sidewalks
are too icy
or snowy
in winter
months
There are no trails or
sidewalks where I want to go
I don’t feel safe
crossing busy
intersections
My destinations
are too far apart
None of the
above
Other
The trails and sidewalks
are in poor condition
I have too much to carry or transport
It’s difficult to find my way
around while biking or walking
I don’t have any incentives
or encouragement to bike
or walk
Sidewalks and trails are not handicap accessible
Safe roads for all
roadway users
Safe intersection
crossings and
facilities
Having off-road trails
for walking and biking
separate from
motorized vehicles
Having scenic and
comfortable bike and
walk routes near parks
and natural corridors
Getting to my
destination as fast as
possible
89%
9%
88%
11%1%2%
77%63%
7%
18%32%
60%
5%5%
33%
Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important
“There are no trails
or sidewalks where I
want to go.”
Strong and
Fearless
13%
36%40%
11%
Enthusiastic
and Confident
Interested but
Concerned
Not Able/
Interested
“Other” response themes included:
• Issues with trail or sidewalk maintenance
• Gaps in the trail, sidewalk, or bikeway network
• Safety concerns; coyotes, dogs, traveling with small
children, poor lighting, paths close to vehicular traffic,
unsafe crossings
• Lack of connections or inconvenient routes
• ADA accessibility for both adults and children
Top response themes included:
• Trail or sidewalks should be added to Delaware and Dodd• Keep up maintenance of existing trails• Make safety improvements, especially for young and old bicyclists• Desire for sidewalks throughout the community• Desire for better bike and ped connections around schools• Connect sidewalks and trails that don’t connect• Improve wayfinding throughout the community• Add lighting along trails and sidewalks for safety
“Fix drainage for water and
ice, enlarge paths for bike
and pedestrian use, install
trails where there are gaps.”
“Preserve the natural areas that the
paved paths already go through...it is
beautiful to walk and bike on those
paths but the environment needs to
be protected in these natural areas. We
also have so few of these areas (Valley
especially important) that we should
really take care of them.”
“I would love to see more
bicycle friendly innovations.”
“Repair trail
surfaces
yearly.
Clear and
maintain
surfaces
year-round.”
“Better bike access to the
middle schools and TRHS
for kids to use, especially
as those high schoolers
who live less than 2 miles
from TRHS.”
“ Very concerned
about people waking
and biking on Dodd
Road. It is not safe,
especially large groups
of students or people
with strollers or dogs.”
“More connections!”
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 181 of 238
8 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
Thompson Park Activity Center Advisory Council
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENTPHASE 2 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
During the second phase of engagement, a series of issues and opportunities
for the bike and ped system were presented on an interactive map and people
were asked to comment on which opportunities they see as the highest
priorities.
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
The city also reached out to several local groups to hold stakeholder meetings
to discuss potential improvements in the plan. Meetings were held with two
organizations:
THOMPSON PARK ACTIVITY CENTER ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING
A summary of the Issues and Opportunities was presented to the group along
with a request for input on the bike/ped system. Attendees mentioned the desire
for walking loops (one mile to three mile loops) and trail amenities (benches,
shade, trash, signage). Members of an existing walking group like walking on off-
street trails, like the River to River Greenway.
VISITATION HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT MEETINGS
Social media and web posts
Visitation High School presentation
Project board at event
ECONOMICS AND
COST
Bicycling and walking are
less expensive than driving,
take up less space on roads,
and require less area to park
at destinations
Pedestrian Plan&Bike
WHAT IS A BIKE & PEDEST
R
I
A
N
P
L
A
N
?
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
WHAT’S GOING ON ?
Include the 6E’s: Evaluation, Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
Engineering, Encouragement,
Enforcement, and Equity in th
e
p
l
a
n
Plan for development of an
interconnected pedestrian
and bicycle system city-wide
Integrate County Greenways
and trails along County
Highways into the system
PLAN PURPOSE AND GOAL
S
An online survey was open durin
g
t
h
e
m
o
n
t
h
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
,
2
0
2
2
,
a
n
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
a
l
m
o
s
t
3
0
0
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
was promoted to Mendota Heig
h
t
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
a
s
k
e
d
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
a
b
o
u
t
b
i
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
community. A selection of res
p
o
n
s
e
s
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
h
e
r
e
.
WHAT HAVE WE HEARD
S
O
F
A
R
?
What are the most important d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
l
k
o
r
bike to? (297 Responses)
Parks and trails
Shopping, dining, and
entertainment
67%
Schools
Residential areas
Other
Places to work
Transit stops or
stations
Community or civic
buildings
9.5%
8%
6%
6%
2%
1%
0.5%
Based on the descriptions about ho
w
o
f
t
e
n
y
o
u
w
a
l
k
o
r
b
i
k
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
warmer months , how would you
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
e
y
o
u
r
a
t
t
i
t
u
d
e
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
biking? (297 Responses)
What keeps you from walking or b
i
k
i
n
g
i
n
M
e
n
d
o
t
a
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
?
(258 Responses) (All that applie
d
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
)
How important are each of the fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
o
y
o
u
w
h
e
n
planning for the future bicycle a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
?
(297 Responses)
I don’t feel
safe walking
or biking near
motorized
traffic
Trails and
sidewalks
are too icy
or snowy
in winter months
There are no trails or
sidewalks where I want
to go
I don’t feel safe
crossing busy
intersections
My destinations
are too far apart
None of the
above
Other
The trails and sidewalks
are in poor condition
I have too much to carry
or transport
It’s difficult to find my way
around while biking or walking
I don’t have any incentives
or encouragement to bike
or walk
Sidewalks and trails are
not handicap accessible
Safe roads
for all
roadway users
Safe
intersection
crossings
and
facilities
Having off-
road trails
for walking
and biking
separate
from motorized
vehicles
Having
scenic and
comfortable
bike and
walk routes
near parks
and natural
corridors
Getting
to my
destination
as fast as possible
89%
9%
88%
11%
1%2%
77%
6
3
%
7%
18%32%
60%
5%
5
%
33%
Very Important Somewhat
Important
Not Important
Strong and
Fearless
13%
36%40%11%
Enthusiastic
and Confident
Interested but
Concerned
Not Able/
Interested
“Other” response themes includ
e
d
:
• Issues with trail or sidewalk ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
• Gaps in the trail, sidewalk, or b
i
k
e
w
a
y
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
• Safety concerns; coyotes, dog
s
,
t
r
a
v
e
l
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
s
m
a
l
l
children, poor lighting, paths clos
e
t
o
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
unsafe crossings
• Lack of connections or inco
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
r
o
u
t
e
s
• ADA accessibility for both adult
s
a
n
d
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
Component Pedestrian
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
Dakota County Greenways
(off street, bituminous, 10’ wi
d
e
trail, destination trails)
X X
Mendota-Lebanon Hills Regional
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Minnesota River Regional Greenw
a
y
(
i
n
c
l
.
B
i
g
R
i
v
e
r
s
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
)
River to River Greenway
Off Street Bituminous Trail
(6’-8’ wide paved trail)
X
X
Trail along Mendota Heights Rd
Trail along Wagon Wheel Rd
Trail along portions of Lexington
A
v
e
Wide Shoulders On-Street X Shoulders along Dodd Road
Shoulders along Hwy 55
Sidewalks (4-6’ wide concrete
walks)
X
Sidewalks in front of business in Th
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
a
t
M
e
n
d
o
t
a
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
Southeastern MH, along Field Ston
e
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
W
a
t
e
r
s
e
d
g
e
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
Grade-separated crossing X X Tunnel under Hwy 62, east of D
o
d
d
R
d
At-Grade crossing X X Painted markings on street, cross
w
a
l
k
,
y
e
l
l
o
w
a
l
e
r
t
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
,
f
l
a
s
h
i
n
g
l
i
g
h
t
s
Currently, Mendota Heights has a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
8
m
i
l
e
s
o
f
p
a
v
e
d
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
n
d
5
m
i
l
e
s
o
f
w
i
d
e
shoulders or on-street bicycle fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
W
h
e
n
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
i
l
s
b
u
i
l
t
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
by Dakota County, the City of
f
e
r
s
a
m
o
s
t
l
y
w
e
l
l
-
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
s
o
m
e
areas of the community lack easy
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
r
a
i
l
s
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
r
o
a
d
s
a
c
t
a
s
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
between neighborhoods and n
e
a
r
b
y
t
r
a
i
l
s
.
In early 2022, the city received
a
g
r
a
n
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
H
e
a
l
t
h
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
(
S
H
I
P
)
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Minnesota Department of Health
a
n
d
D
a
k
o
t
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
improvements in the communit
y
.
T
h
e
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
g
u
i
d
e
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
-
m
a
k
i
n
g
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
future investments in and prio
r
i
t
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
b
i
k
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a foundation for seeking funding
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
a
i
m
s
t
o
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
m
o
r
e
b
i
k
e
-
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
walkable Mendota Heights.
ISSUES & OPPORTUNIT
I
E
S
SYSTEM COMPONENTS
The map on the following pag
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
i
s
s
u
e
s
,
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
b
i
k
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
system in Mendota Heights. Ma
j
o
r
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
r
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
t
a
b
l
e
b
e
l
o
w
.
‘E’ Category
Definition
Recommendations
EDUCATION Teaching people to walk and bike
s
a
f
e
l
y
;
t
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
motorized movers to watch for n
o
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
movers; informing law enforcement
;
i
n
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
legislators of the importance and
v
a
l
u
e
o
f
b
i
k
i
n
g
and walking
Wayfinding signage; Etiquette si
g
n
a
g
e
;
B
i
k
e
R
o
d
e
o
;
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
a
m
p
ENGINEERING Identification of physical barriers
t
o
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
biking; infrastructure improveme
n
t
s
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
walking and biking, such as cro
s
s
i
n
g
s
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
sidewalks, on-street facilities, bike
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
e
t
c
.
Develop crossing improvements,
N
e
w
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
throughout the community; De
v
e
l
o
p
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
;
Maintain the ped/bike system
ENCOURAGEMENT Programs that get people excit
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
or biking, advertising and promoti
o
n
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
s
,
outreach, events, etc.
Develop an online map of ped/bike
r
o
u
t
e
s
a
n
d
l
o
o
p
s
;
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
information about destinations a
n
d
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
b
y
p
e
d
/
b
i
k
e
;
F
o
l
k
s
on Spokes (city program, partne
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
W
S
P
a
n
d
S
S
P
)
ENFORCEMENT Law enforcement support for both
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
a
n
d
non-motorized users; appropriat
e
l
y
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
r
u
l
e
s
and laws to keep people safe
Work with law enforcement offi
c
e
r
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
follow the rules of the road or is
s
u
e
p
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
;
D
o
g
w
a
l
k
e
r
s
n
e
e
d
t
o
control their dogs while walkin
g
o
n
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
EQUITY Traffic codes and rules that trea
t
n
o
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
movers as equal users of the tra
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
system; equal access to facilities an
d
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
for all movement types
Review rules within the commu
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
community members of all ag
e
s
a
n
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
b
l
e
t
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
bike and ped facilities
EXPERIENCE Making transportation an experien
c
e
b
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
for both motor and non-motor ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
F
o
c
u
s
o
n
safety, views, destinations, etc.
Promotion of outdoor recreation;
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
g
o
a
l
s
;
U
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
that MH is a dark community, w
h
i
c
h
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
(
l
a
w
enforcement recently made re
f
l
e
c
t
i
n
g
s
a
s
h
e
s
f
o
r
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
a
n
d
walkers)
ETHICS Values-based decision-making p
r
o
c
e
s
s
t
h
a
t
i
s
centered on ethics, empathy, a
n
d
e
q
u
i
t
y
Elected officials should value
b
i
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
n
a
n
equal level with motorized facilitie
s
EVALUATION Determine if the system is prov
i
d
i
n
g
v
a
l
u
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
accessible facilities; evaluate the nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
u
s
e
r
s
of the ped/bike system
Currently evaluating the system
w
i
t
h
s
u
r
v
e
y
s
/
e
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
;
Metrics (do complaints go down?
)
;
L
o
o
k
a
t
S
t
r
a
v
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
s
f
o
r
usership of trails; Evaluate Street
L
i
g
h
t
d
a
t
a
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
b
i
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
walking
HEALTH AND
COMMUNITY
EXPERIENCE
Bicycling and walking allow
people to experience the
outdoors, see others’ faces,
promotes community
engagement and connections,
and encourages active living
and healthy lifestyles
SUSTAINABILITY
Bikes and feet create less
wear and tear on roads and
trails than motor vehicles;
long-term this costs
taxpayers less money for
maintenance and repair
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AND
RECREATION
Trails offer access to a
variety of urban and natural
environments; destination
trails bring people into
communities for leisure and
recreation opportunities and
enhance the local economy
IMPORTANCE AND VALU
E
O
F
A
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN S
Y
S
T
E
M
PLAN STRATEGIES & ORG
A
N
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
The following “E” categories are
u
s
e
d
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
n
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
implement strategies in the Bik
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
.
HELP THE CITY PLAN BY
REVIEWING AND COMMEN
T
I
N
G
ON THE INTERACTIVE MAP
!
https://hkgi.mysocialpinpoint.com
/
m
e
n
d
o
t
a
-
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
-
p
h
a
s
e
-
2
-
m
a
p
/
m
a
p
#
/
E
E
E
E E
E
Scan!
Students were presented with a summary of the issues and opportunities
and asked for input on recommendations. Many students mentioned the
importance of safety for biking and walking and the desire for separated
trails and sidewalks, rather than on-street bike or walk facilities. Students also
expressed the feeling that the experience of a trail or bikeway
is very important to the usability, and that a connected
bike and ped system is important for families and kids
in a community.
Students filled out a survey that asked about
where they walk, why they walk, and top
improvements for bike and pedestrian facilities.
Many students indicated that they walk in
their neighborhoods and on loop trails. The
most common reasons the students walk
are for fun/exercise and to meet up
with friends. Top improvements
that were listed include: Improve
busy intersection crossings with
wider crosswalks, more warning
signage, and more vibrant paint
or surface treatments; Build more
off-road trails that are separated
from vehicular traffic; and Build
more sidewalks in neighborhoods
and along city streets.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 182 of 238
9 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
g
f
a
d
e
kj
ib
c
h
X High Priority X Low Priority X General Comment
(b)“A trail connecting Wachtler to Trail Rd/Valley Park via the western edge of the Par 3 golf course would be a great link. It would more safely connect residents between the Highway 13/Ivy Falls area with Valley Park and its nearby network of paths. It would allow pedestrians to stay off of Dodd’s dangerous shoulder by using a “shortcut” through the golf course.”
(f)“It is a major gap that the path just ends at Wesley Court. This section of Dodd is treacherous for adults and children alike to walk or bike. The shoulder is narrow or non-existent in several places. If a path were added for bikes/pedestrians, both could more easily walk/bike to the MH Village and Plaza or up to shopping at Smith and Dodd. I also believe it would be safer for some kids who walk to Somerset School.”
(g)“We desperately need to have a trail path on Dodd Road leading from Emerson to the City Center. We should be able to walk or bike without using the street.”
(a)“This is a hazardous crossing for bicyclists. Motorists move quickly to enter and exit the freeway ramp and often do not look for bicyclists crossing the road where it intersects the path. There needs to be more/better signaling to motorists about the bike crossing and better traffic control to sort out the use conflicts.”
(d)“Please, please, please consider adding a separate bike path along Dodd from the Village/62 to at least Somerset Elementary. As both a motorist while others are biking and a parent to kids who want to bike to school/ friends’ houses, the current shoulder is not safe enough/ wide enough given the number of blind spots on this portion of Dodd Rd.”
(e)“There needs to be a path along Dodd. I watch kids walk and bike on this area all the time. It’s unsafe. Town Center to Somerset should be connected in some form. We are disconnected from walkable or bikeable methods to get to town center or even the paths at Marie.”
(k)“Bike/ped lane should be added on Delaware south of 62 to Mendota Heights Road.”(j)“Motorists are confused about this intersection, which seems to give them more excuses to not yield to pedestrians. I’d like to see a push-button LED flashing crosswalk light installed here to help minimize the confusion for motorists.”
(i)“A trail here should be built to connect to the trails along Wentworth in WSP. This section of road is very dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians due to 40 mph speed limit and no shoulders. There is plenty of space for a separated trail.”
(c)“This path is at the same grade/height as the road and only separated by less than 1’ in places; the speed allowed on the road makes it feel unsafe on this section of path. In the winter when there is ice and snow build up on the path it is even more dangerous for pedestrians. A new curb would be helpful for both the drainage and pedestrian safety.”
(h)“The Emerson/Delaware intersection continues to be a hazard to both vehicles and pedestrians.”
SOCIAL PINPOINT MAP SUMMARY
PARTICIPATION COMMENT TRENDS
• Narrowing the road and decreasing traffic speeds on Dodd to add pedestrian facilities. Trail needs to be along all of Dodd and connect to major interest points.• Safer connections to schools, parks, and other POI for families needed.• More signage - wayfinding, pedestrian crossings, speed limits, etc.• Problems with vehicular traffic speeding, not looking for bikes and pedestrians, running lights and stop signs, or failing to yield. More design elements to keep bikes and peds safe from vehicles, more enforcement of the rules.• Too much focus on making pedestrian facilities fit in with vehicular traffic, instead of designing trail routes the way bikes/ped would use them/desire them to be (avoiding steep hills, busy roads, scenic routes, etc.)• Trails gaps and lack of safe connections to schools, neighborhoods, parks, athletic fields, and other trail networks need to be addressed to make everything work.
• More visibility for bikes and pedestrians.
TOTAL SITE VISITS970
UNIQUE USERS368
UNIQUE STAKEHOLDERS54
COMMENTS105
POPULAR
COMMENTS:
The following
comments are
a representative
display of over 180
comments.
#= Number
of Likes
44
39
36
36
36
18
16
23
22
20
16
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 183 of 238
10 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTISSUES & OPPORTUNITIESISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
SUMMARY OF RELATED PLANNING
2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan mentions the importance of multi-modal
transportation planning at a high level and the value it has for attracting
residents and families to the city. The plan includes a list and description of
existing and planned regional trails in the city, but it does not include a detailed
list of recommendations for bike and ped facilities.
VISION STATEMENT
Mendota Heights will be recognized as a high quality, family-oriented residential
community, with a spacious, natural feel and the amenities of a city.
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of life in Mendota Heights
by providing quality public safety, infrastructure, and planning for orderly and
sustainable growth.
DAKOTA COUNTY PLANNING
Pedestrian and bicycle safety are addressed in Dakota County plans:
DAKOTA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The county’s transportation plan identifies the goal of providing a multi-
modal system for county residents. The plan lists gaps in the system
related to the countywide greenway system, the RBTN, state highway
trails, and state trails.
BIKE PED STUDY
This study identifies important pedestrian and bicycling gaps in the city.
Delaware Ave and Lexington Ave are identified as pedestrian and bicycle
gaps in Mendota Heights.
cp v:\1938\active\193803569\reports\mendota hts dodd road tra
i
l
s
t
u
d
y
f
i
n
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
6
1
1
0
7
.
d
o
c
x
Dodd Road
Trail Feasibility
Study
Prepared for:
City of Mendota Heights
Prepared by:
Fay Simer, AICP
November 7, 2017
Dakota County
2040
Transportation Plan
July 2021
DODD ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY
This study was completed in 2017 and includes a recommendation for a
shared-use path along the entire length of Dodd Road within the City of
Mendota Heights. The path would need a 20-foot wide corridor, which would
include buffer area between the road edge and the path, a 8-10 foot wide
path, and additional width for utilities. As the Dodd Road right-of-way width
varies throughout the city, easements and acquisition would be needed to
achieve the 20 foot trail corridor. This is especially challenging in the northern
part of the city.
DAKOT
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
PEDEST
R
I
A
N
A
N
D
BICYCL
E
STUDY
DECEMB
E
R
, 2018
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 184 of 238
11 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
River to River Greenway
Master Plan
adopted by the Dakota County Bo
a
r
d
o
f
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
s
a
u
g
u
s
t
2
5
,
2
0
1
5
approved by the Metropolitan Coun
c
i
l
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
7
Mendota-Lebanon H
i
l
l
s
Greenway
MASTER PLAN
ADOPTED BY THE D
A
K
O
T
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
B
O
A
R
D
O
F
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
E
R
S
A
U
G
U
S
T
2
0
,
2
0
1
3
Adopted by the dAkotA County boArd of Commissioners oCtober 18, 2011
Approved by the metr
o
p
o
l
i
t
An CounCil JAnuAry 25, 2012
Minnesota River
Greenway
mAster plAn
DAKOTA COUNTY RIVER TO RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN
The River to River Greenway connects the Minnesota River to the Mississippi
River through the communities of Lilydale, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul,
and South St. Paul. The greenway has an urban character and follows several
roads, except for the portions through Valley Park in Mendota Heights, and
through Kaposia Park in South St. Paul.
DAKOTA COUNTY MENDOTA-LEBANON HILLS GREENWAY MASTER
PLAN
The Mendota Lebanon Hills Regional Greenway begins at the Village at Mendota
Heights, where it intersects with the River to River Greenway. A short segment of
the trail is built as an underpass of Hwy 62 and a trail to the south. The planned
route would follow Dodd Rd south into Eagan. The southern end of the greenway
corridor is at Lebanon Hills Regional Park.
DAKOTA COUNTY MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN
The Minnesota River Greenway Master Plan identifies a trail corridor that includes
the Big River Regional Trail and continues south along the Minnesota River and is
parallel to Hwy 13. The trail connects Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Eagan,
and Burnsville.
DAKOTA COUNTY GREENWAYS
The Dakota County Greenway
network includes 15 existing,
planned, and proposed regional
trail corridors. The trails connect
parks, schools, civic destinations,
and commercial areas. Greenways
are designed to provide non-
motorized transportation corridors,
habitat restoration areas, water
quality improvements, and passive
recreation opportunities. The City of
Mendota Heights is home to several
existing and planned greenway
segments: River to River Greenway,
Minnesota River Greenway, and the
Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway.
Dakota County Comprehensive Plan, DC2040
Chapter 4: Park System, Page 71
Figure 4.2: Existing Parks, Natural Areas, and Greenways
Source: Dakota County Office of Planning, 2018
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 185 of 238
12 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
April 2021
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLANS
SCHOOL TRAVEL SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR DAKOTA COUNTY
(APRIL 2021)
School properties located immediately next to county or state right-of-way were
included in the assessment, resulting in a total of 48 schools within Dakota County.
Of these, the following (4) schools were assessed in Mendota Heights:
• Two Rivers (formerly Henry Sibley) High School (CR 63; High Speed, 2-3 Lanes)
• Visitation School – private (TH 149 – Dodd Road; High Speed, 2-3 Lanes)
• Somerset Elementary (TH 149 – Dodd Road; Low Speed)
• Heritage STEM Middle School (CR 4, Low Speed)
Recommendations are based on the type of county or state roadway adjacent to
school.
Note that during the online engagement phase 1, Somerset Elementary School
reported the second highest number of responses of all of the schools (56
responses).
SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS BY SCHOOL IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS:
Two Rivers (formerly Henry Sibley) High
School:
• Sidewalk and Trail Infrastructure:
-Construct sidewalk or trail on east side of CR 63
(Delaware Ave) to connect to school crossing. Install
street lighting on CR 63 near school. Connect school
directly to CR 63 with sidewalk
• Major School Crossing:
-Develop a walking and biking route plan that supports
the need for a school crossing on CR 63. Construct a
school crossing on CR 63 between Deer Run Trail and
Preserve Path. Include high visibility crosswalk markings,
median refuge, street lighting, pedestrian activated
devices (RRFB recommended).
• Evaluate School Speed Zone:
-Evaluate school speed zone after crossing improvements
are made
• Enforcement:
-Enforce school speed zone if implemented
• School and District Considerations:
-Develop a SRTS Plan, provide walking and biking safety
education.
Heritage STEM Middle School:
• Sidewalk and Trail Infrastructure:
-Construct sidewalk on CR 4 between CR 63 and Smith
Ave.
• Major School Crossing:
-County to install crossing enhancements (advance stop
bars, street lighting) at the existing school crossing on
CR 4) at Heritage MS
• Evaluate School Speed Zone:
-School and District to provide a current school route
plan.
-County to conduct a speed study to determine if a
school speed zone is needed on CR 4.
• Enforcement: Enforce school speed zone if
implemented
• School and District Considerations:
-Develop a SRTS Plan, provide walking and biking safety
education. ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIESCity Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 186 of 238
13 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
DRAFT
Somerset SRTS
Program Action Plan
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs include non-infrastructure
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
e
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
encouragement, and evaluation. The following program
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
f
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the Somerset Rapid Planning Workshop and responses
t
o
t
h
e
c
a
r
e
g
i
v
e
r
s
u
r
v
e
y
.
SRTS Partners
Implementing a successful and sustainable SRTS program
d
e
p
e
n
d
s
o
n
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
a
m
o
n
g
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,
s
c
hool and
school district staff, parents, teachers, students,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
,
a
n
d
b
e
y
o
n
d
.
T
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
a
v
e
a
role to play in supporting SRTS implementation moving
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
.
STAKEHOLDER DETAILS
School District (ISD 197)●Operations:
●Transportation:
●Safety Training:
Somerset Elementary ●Administrators:
●Teachers:
City of Mendota Heights ●Planning:
●Public Works:
●Law Enforcement:
Dakota County ●Public Health:
MnDOT ●Metro District:
●State Aid:
●Office of Transit and Active Transportation (SRTS):
Parents ●PTO:
●Fusion Lab:
●Volunteers:
Students ●Live Green Team:
Other ●Dodge Nature Center:
●Community Members:
Somerset SRTS - Program Action Plan 1
Somerset Elementary
• Sidewalk and Trail Infrastructure:
-MnDOT construct sidewalk on TH 149 as opportunities
arise (long-term recommendation)
• School Crossings:
-Consider a school crossing guard at the school
driveway.
-Consider crossing guard at TH 149 and Emerson Ave
intersection
• Evaluate School Speed Zone:
-City and District to work with MnDOT to implement
flashers on the school speed zone.
• Enforcement:
-Periodically enforce school speed zone on TH 149
• School District Considerations:
-Provide walking and biking safety education
-Construct sidewalk on Emerson Ave between TH 149
and CR 63 if there is a project opportunity or if funding
becomes available.
Visitation School
• City Considerations:
-Request to MnDOT to update the left-turn indicators at
the traffic signal at TH 149 and Mendota Heights Road
to reduce delays during school drop-off and pick-up.
SOMERSET SRTS PROGRAM ACTION PLAN
Program recommendations primarily point to continuing or building from existing
programs that are happening today at Somerset Elementary School, such as:
• Walk & Bike to School Day
• Remote Drop and Walk
• School Communications
• Crossing Guards
• Walking Field Trips
• Walk! Bike! Fun! Pedestrian and Bicycle Curriculum
FRIENDLY HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL SRTS
PLAN (2010)
Recommendations from the Friendly Hills SRTS
Plan include enhancing and improving crosswalk
markings, adding a speed zone, and constructing a
new trail or sidewalk to provide better access. Some
improvements have been made, but additional trail
connections are still desired.
DAKOTA COUNTY PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
ASSESSMENT
This assessment does not identify specific recommendations for locations in
Mendota Heights, but it can be used as a guide for some of the challenging
crossing locations noted in the plan. An outcome of the assessment was
a diagram and list of needs, improvements, and considerations, for each
studied intersection.
https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/Transportation/TransportationStudies/
Current/Pages/pedestrian-crossing-safety-assessment.aspx
H:\Projects\14000\14242\Design\Graphics\14242_Design Exhibits.dwg : DODD BLVDJob #142429/14/2021 - 11:57AM
Dodd Boulevard Crossing
Dakota County Pedestrian Crossing Safety AssessmentLakeville, MN
Figure 5
Wentworth Avenue and Humboldt Avenue
11.3'
180'10.7'H:\Projects\14000\14242\Design\Graphics\14242_Design Exhibits.dwg : WENTWORTH & HUMBOLDTJob #142429/14/2021 - 10:04PM
Wentworth Avenue & Humboldt AvenueDakota County Pedestrian Crossing Safety AssessmentWest St. Paul, MN
Figure 2
Improvement Need.
Low yield compliance for people crossing
Wentworth Boulevard at the existing marked
crosswalk and long, multi-lane crossing distance.
Proposed Temporary Improvements.
- Pedestrian island refuge (median)
- Enhanced crossing signage
- Ladder crosswalk markings
Other Considerations.
- The addition of in-street pedestrian signage
is shown to increase yield compliance between
motorists and people crossing.
- Use in-street signs on the main roadway at a side-
street, stop location.
- Overuse of in-street signs can reduce
effectiveness as motorists become accustomed to
the signs thereby reducing compliance.
- The median width should be maximized to
increase the comfort of people waiting in the
middle of the roadway to cross and must be six feet
wide at minimum. Resources.
Minnesota Best Practices for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety (2021), MnDOT
Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crosswalk Quick Reference Guide (2020), Minnesota Local Road Research Board
Area Where Applicable.
- Three-lane roadway
- Speeds of 35 mph or less
- Location where the crossing distance could be
prohibitive due to the number of lanes or overall
width of the roadway.
Painted pedestrian
island refuge (median)
with poles
Pedestrian Crossing Ahead
Sign
Enhanced pedestrian crossing
signs Pedestrian Crossing
Ahead Sign
nmTRINITY SCHOOL
nm
FRIENDLYHILLS PARK
COPPERFIELD
PONDS PARK
FRIENDLY
MARSH PARK
MENDAKOTAPARK
HAGSTROMKING PARK
KENSINGTON
PARK
123:
1239
1239
FRIENDLY HILLSMIDDLE SCHOOLDODD RDONEILL RD DELAWARE AVEHUBER DR
WAGON WHEEL TRL
NORTHWEST PKY
BLUEBILL DR APACHE STDE
C
O
R
A
H
L
N
CHERI LN
PAGEL RDAZTEC LNCOP
P
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
D
R
CHEY
E
N
N
E
L
N
L
O
N
E
O
A
K
P
K
Y
LONE
O
A
K
D
R
KE
O
K
U
K
L
N FIELD STONE DRPUEBLO LNO
C
A
L
A
L
N
ABBEY WAYVISITATION DRMO
N
E
T
C
T
LONE OAK PTAMES CROSSING RDHAVERTON RDAPACHE LNALICE LNM
O
H
I
C
A
N
L
N
C
O
M
M
E
R
S
D
R
NORTHWEST PKWYSWAN CTSTONE RDROGERS CTAPACHE CTWHITFIELD DRBRIDGEVIEW
C
T BENT TREE LNPOND CIR EARBOR CTKRESSIN AVEPOND CIR WCYGNET LNCONDON CTWESTVIEW TERPUEBLO DRHERITAGE
DRMENDAKOTA CT
HAZEL CT
PONDHAVEN CIRHAMPSHI
R
E
D
R
Eagan
Mendota Heights
Sunfish LakeInver Grove HeightsFRIENDLY HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS¯0 960480
Feet
Æó 89:wÅÆÇ
ÅÆÇÅÆÇÅÆÇ
ÅÆÇ
89:w
89:w
%&'(494
èëìì
èëìì
èëìì
149
ÅÆÇ
¯°³´
èëìì
SCHOOL CROSSING
SIDEWALKPATH
CROSSWALK
BICYCLE RACKS
ÅÆÇ89:wÆó
!"$
1.0 MILE RADIUS AROUND SCHOOL
Legend
SCHOOLnmALL-WAY STOP
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PARK
ON-SITE SIDEWALK
Æÿ63
123;
Æÿ63
1 - RESTRIPE CROSSWALKS IN PARKING LOT
AND DRIVEWAY
2 - CONSIDER SCHOOL SPEED ZONE WITH DYNAMIC SPEED DISPLAY SIGNS
3 - CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK/TRAIL
3
1
3
2
3
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 187 of 238
14 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
Existing underpass of Marie Ave.
Existing marked crosswalk
Valley Park trail
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Currently, Mendota Heights has approximately 28 miles of paved trails and
sidewalks and 5 miles of wide shoulders or on-street bicycle facilities. When
combined with existing regional trails built and maintained by Dakota County,
the City offers a mostly well-connected and accessible trail system. However,
some areas of the community lack easy access to trails because highways and
arterial roads act as barriers between neighborhoods and nearby trails.
Existing facilities in the city include:
BIKE AND PED SYSTEM
• City or County Paved Trail
-Paved multi-use trails located along city or county roadways (typically 6-8’ wide)
-Located in Valley Park, along Marie Avenue, and along Mendota Heights Road
• Wide Shoulders/On Street
-Shoulders along Dodd Road that are striped and identified for bicycling
-Width of shoulders varies between 6’ and 10’
-There is no separation between vehicle traffic
• Sidewalks
-Concrete walkways in neighborhoods meant for pedestrians only
-Typically 4’-6’ wide
-Located in the far north and the southeast corners of the city. Most residential streets
in the city do not have sidewalks along them.
• Lilydale Pedestrian Trail
-Outside of Mendota Heights
-Paved trail along Hwy 13
-Meant exclusively for pedestrians
GREENWAYS
• Dakota County Greenway
-Greenways are regional trail corridors planned and operated by Dakota County.
Many of the greenways are built in segments, so the full routes are not fully
constructed or connected.
-The River to River Greenway is a regional trail that starts at the Lilydale Trailhead
in the northwestern part of Mendota Heights, follows the trail through Valley Park,
crosses Dodd Rd at the Village at Mendota Heights, and continues past Two River
High School along Marie Ave. and into West St. Paul continuing on to Kaposia
Landing and the Mississippi River Greenway in South St. Paul.
-The Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway starts at the Village at Mendota Heights,
travels under Hwy 62 and continues south. The trail is planned to follow Dodd Road
south into Eagan.
-The Minnesota River Greenway and Big Rivers Regional Trail start at the Lilydale
Trailhead and follow Hwy 13 to the south. Most of the trail within Mendota Heights
is constructed along this route.
STATE TRAIL
• A shared-use path is located on the Hwy 55 bridge over the Minnesota River.
This trail connects to Fort Snelling State Park on the north/west side of the
river.ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIESWide shoulders and a multi-use trail along Dodd
Rd.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 188 of 238
15 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 189 of 238
16 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
BIKE AND PED SYSTEM
• Planned Trail
-Paved multi-use trails that are identified as planned projects
-Located along Delaware Ave, Emerson Ave and Sylvandale Rd
• Trail Gaps
-Gaps in the trail system that would help connectivity or have
been asked for by citizens
-May not be planned projects
-Located along Dodd Rd, Wentworth Ave, Delaware Ave (south
of Hwy 62), Lexington Ave, and Pilot Knob Road
• Desired Trail Connection (Feasibility Issues)
-Trail gaps that are likely not able to be constructed due to
significant cost because of physical, topographic, land use or
land ownership issues
GREENWAYS
• Potential Future Greenway
-Corridors or routes that have been identified by Dakota
County for future greenway trails
-The planned Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway is located
along Dodd Road (south of Hwy 62)
-The proposed Soo Line Greenway is a potential future
greenway corridor. It is not designed or planned, but it is
envisioned to be located along a rail corridor (southwest
of Hwy 55). Development of this corridor would improve
connectivity and walk, bike, roll options in the city.
• Existing City Trail (Future Greenway)
-Dakota County has identified some existing city trails as ideal
corridors for county greenway routes. The county would take
over operations and maintenance or create an agreement
with the city in order to improve these trails and identify them
as part of the county’s greenway system.
MAJOR ROAD - BARRIER
Highways and arterial roads in the city are identified
as barriers to pedestrian and bicycle movement. These
facilities typically don’ t have ped or bike facilities along
them, and they are difficult to cross as the traffic moves
freely and there are many lanes of traffic to cross.
MNDOT highways lack pedestrian and bicycle paths
throughout the city and act as barriers for bicycle and
pedestrian crossing. These highways include:
• Hwy 149 – an RBTN corridor that provides a strategic
connection to the high bridge and St. Paul
• Hwy 13 – a heavily traveled corridor that is surrounded by
high density housing in Mendota Heights and LilydaleISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES• Hwy 62 – a major barrier to pedestrian and bicycle travel,
absent of trails and leading to the Mendota Bridge, MSP
airport to the west and Robert Street commercial corridor
to the east
• Hwy 55 which provides critical connections to major
employers in southern Mendota Heights and in northern
Eagan
Grade-separated crossings (tunnels or bridges) and highly
marked crosswalks are recommended to improve mobility
in the city. The type of improvement recommended is
dependent on the surrounding context. Each site should be
evaluated for the proper treatment.
CROSSINGS / IMPROVEMENTS
• Existing Tunnel
-A tunnel under a roadway meant for bicycle or pedestrian use
-Two ped/bike tunnels are located in the city: under Marie Ave
and under Hwy 62
• Existing At Grade Crossing
-Crosswalks or other marked crossings at roadway intersections
• Existing Bridge Crossing
-Locations where roadway bridges separate traffic and trails
from busy roadways
• Proposed Dakota County Tunnel
-Dakota County is planning to construct a ped/bike tunnel
under Dodd Rd, just north of the intersection with Hwy 62. This
is part of the River to River Greenway corridor.
• Proposed At Grade Crossing Enhancement
-These are sites where improvements, such as enhanced
crosswalk markings, warning signage, and flashing lights are
recommended to improve crossing safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
• New Wayfinding Sign
-Wayfinding signs would include information about directions
to trail connections and destinations, and could include trail
maps. Several wayfinding signs are suggested around the Hwy
62 ped/bike tunnel to make walkers and bikers aware of the
grade-separated crossing.
ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES
An analysis of the existing system includes planned bike and ped projects and potential opportunities for new facilities in
the city.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 190 of 238
17 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES MAP
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 191 of 238
18 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
LAND USE
RETAIL AND EMPLOYMENT DESTINATIONS
Trails and other non-motorized facilities are located mainly in residential destinations in Mendota
Heights. Existing retail and employment destinations in the city and in nearby cities lack sufficient
walk, bike, and roll access to encourage residents to commute to work without a vehicle. Village at
Mendota Heights, Mendota Plaza, and Two Rivers High School have the most trail access, as they are
within the major residential context. Other office and industrial areas in the southwest part of the city
lack trail access.
MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Multifamily housing locations in the city indicate potential concentrations of SHIP priority populations.
These areas are particularly important for providing safe and connected walking, biking, and rolling
facilities. Multifamily housing are scattered throughout the community and in adjacent communities.
Several sites are located along Hwy 13, Dodd Rd/TH 149, along 35E, and along Hwy 55. Improving
crossings of barriers (major roadways) within the community will improve connectivity for multifamily
housing sites.
ESSENTIAL CONNECTIONS
Pedestrian and bicycle access between multi family housing/senior housing, schools, grocery stores,
and parks, are essential for addressing the needs of SHIP priority populations.
A trail facility along the entire length
of Dodd Rd / TH 149 would greatly
improve connectivity for many
of those land uses listed above.
Additional connectivity could
be achieved by improving road
crossings throughout the community
as there are several barriers.
Chapter 1 - Introduction & Background
City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
18
Table 1-1. Public School Enrollment for K-12 Schools within the City of Mendota Heights:
2007-08 vs. 2018-19 School Years
School Grades 2007-08 Total
Enrollment
2018-19 Total
Enrollment
Percent Change
2007-08 to
2015-16
Mendota Elementary School K - 4th 360 388 8%
Somerset Elementary School K - 4th 318 419 32%
Friendly Hills Middle School 5th - 8th 597 727 22%
Henry Sibley High School 9th - 12th 1,462 1,477 1%
There are six public and private schools offering kindergarten through 12th grade located within
the City of Mendota Heights: Mendota Elementary School, Somerset Elementary School, Friendly
Hills Middle School, Henry Sibley High School, St. Thomas Academy, and Visitation School.
The previous table provides a breakdown of enrollment of the K-12 public schools located within
the city at the start of the 2007 - 2008 school year compared with the 2015-2016 school year.
Table 1-2. Private School Enrollment for K-12 Schools within the City of Mendota Heights:
2007-08 vs. 2018-19 School Year
School Grades 2007-08 Total
Enrollment
2018-19 Total
Enrollment
Percent Change
2007-08 to
2015-16
St. Thomas Academy 6th - 12th 695 632 -10%
Visitation School Montessori - 12th 600 585 -2.5%
Source: St. Thomas Academy and Visitation School websites
The number of students enrolled in private schools within the city was 1,201 during the 2015-
16 school year, down from the 2007-2008 school year, when 1,295 students were enrolled in
private schools.
SCHOOLS IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND THEIR ENROLLMENT
(from the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan)
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 192 of 238
19 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Retail and
Employment
Destinations
Multifamily
Housing
MSP
AIRPORT
INDUSTRIAL
& OFFICE
USES
ST. THOMAS ACADEMY &
VISITATION
SCHOOLS
TWO
RIVERS HIGH
SCHOOL
VILLAGE AT
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS
MENDOTA
PLAZA
OFFICE
USES
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS LAND USE
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 193 of 238
20 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
REGIONAL BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (RBTN)
The Metropolitan Council has identified priority RBTN corridors throughout the metro area. In Mendota Heights, Dodd
Rd, south of Hwy 62, identified as a Tier 1 Priority RBTN corridor.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 194 of 238
21 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
POPULATION IN POVERTY BY CENSUS TRACT
This map identifies areas of the city that have higher concentrations of people living in poverty. These areas include the
northern area where there is older housing stock and a few sites of multifamily housing. More emphasis and priority
should be placed on providing safe connections from this area of the city to destinations within the city.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 195 of 238
22 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
EDUCATION
Provide educational opportunity for people to learn to walk,
bike, and roll safely; Provide opportunity for motorized movers
to learn to watch for non-motorized movers; informing law
enforcement; informing legislators of the importance and
value of biking and walking
Wayfinding signage; Etiquette signage; Bike Rodeo; Safety
Camp
ENGINEERING
Identification of physical barriers to walking and biking;
infrastructure improvements to facilitate walking and biking,
such as crossings, trails, sidewalks, on-street facilities, bike
parking, etc.
Develop crossing improvements, new trails, and sidewalks
throughout the community; Develop Safe Routes to School
Plans within the city and implement them; Maintain the
ped/bike system
ENCOURAGEMENT
Programs that get people excited about walking or biking,
advertising and promotional campaigns, outreach, events, etc.Develop an online map of ped/bike routes and loops;
Provide information about destinations and distances by
ped/bike; Folks on Spokes (city program, partnership with
West St. Paul and South St. Paul)
ENFORCEMENT
Law enforcement support for both motorized and non-
motorized users; appropriately enforce rules and laws to keep
people safe
Work with law enforcement officers to ensure drivers and
bicyclists follow the rules of the road or issue penalties; Dog
walkers need to control their dogs while walking on trails
and other facilities
EQUITY
Traffic codes and rules that treat non-motorized movers as
equal users of the transportation system; equal access to
facilities and destinations for all movement types
Review rules within the community and access to ensure
that community members of all ages and abilities are able
to access bike and ped facilities
EXPERIENCE
Making transportation an experience by design for both motor
and non-motor vehicles. Focus on safety, views, destinations,
etc.
Promotion of outdoor recreation; Greenway goals;
Understand that Mendota Heights is a poorly lit community,
which impacts safety (law enforcement recently made
reflecting sashes for cyclists and walkers)
ETHICS
Values-based decision-making process that is centered on
ethics, empathy, and equity Elected officials should value biking and walking facilities
on an equal level with motorized facilities
EVALUATION
Determine if the system is providing valuable and accessible
facilities; evaluate the number of users of the ped/bike system Currently evaluating the system with surveys/engagement;
Metrics (do complaints go down?); Look at Strava numbers
for usership of trails; Evaluate StreetLight data regarding
biking and walking
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONSPLAN STRATEGIES & ORGANIZATION
The following “E” categories are used to identify various types of projects and programs that can be used to implement
strategies in the Bike and Pedestrian Plan.
EDUCATION
ENGINEERING
ENCOURAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
EQUITY
EXPERIENCE
ETHICS
EVALUATION
DEFINITION RECOMMENDATIONS
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 196 of 238
23 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Etiquette signage
Wayfinding
Bike classes
EDUCATION
The city’s bike and pedestrian system must include efforts to:
• Educated people to walk and bike safely
• Educate motorized movers to watch for non-motorized movers
• Inform law enforcement of new city laws and policies
• Inform legislators of the importance and value of biking and walking
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Collaborate with Dakota County to install Wayfinding Signage to direct
bicyclists and pedestrians to Hwy 62 underpass (see map below). Public
engagement indicated that many bikers and walkers are not aware of the
tunnel under Hwy 62, just east of Dodd Rd. Signs should be placed at all
potential locations, north/east/south/west of the tunnel to direct people to
access the tunnel safely.
• Install Etiquette Signage along busy trail segments
-Signs along trails that inform users to share the trail with multiple users, yield to
pedestrians and those with disabilities, alert people on the trail when passing (on
bikes), and to pick up after pets
• Bike Rodeo:
-Bike safety fair or event to demonstrate safe riding to children, bike on a designated
course or loop, and get free helmets and other bike gear
• Explore and utilize “Walk! Bike! Fun!”
-MNDOT’s curriculum targeted to youth walking and biking safety
• Safety Camp:
-Many communities offer half day to full day safety camps for kids where they can
learn about bike safety and helmet use, as well as general safety tips from police and
Safety camp
RECOMMENDED WAYFINDING SIGN LOCATIONS
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 197 of 238
24 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
ENGINEERING
This section includes the physical pieces of the bike and ped system: physical barriers to walking and biking
and recommended infrastructure improvements to facilitate walking and biking, such as road crossings, trails,
sidewalks, and on-street facilities, etc.
BARRIERS
Physical barriers to walking and biking include major highways and arterial roads that lack pedestrian or bike
facilities or crossings, gaps in trail connections, and other major land or water features that are not crossable by
bike or by foot. The map below identifies major barriers to walking and biking in Mendota Heights:
SYSTEM BARRIERS DIAGRAM
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Major Road - Barrier
Crossings / Improvements
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Major Road - Barrier
Crossings / Improvements
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Major Road - Barrier
Crossings / ImprovementsRECOMMENDATIONS• Interstates 35E and 494
• Hwy 62
• Hwy 55
• Segment of Hwy 13 where there
is steep topography and there is
no trail
• Segment of Delaware Ave. where
there are steep shoulders and no
trail facility
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 198 of 238
25 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS & SYSTEM COMPONENTS
• Develop crossing improvements, including at-grade
improvements, such as signage, signals, and surface
treatments. Consider artistic crosswalk markings to slow
traffic and call attention to bicyclists and pedestrians at
crossings near schools and parks.
• Build new trails and sidewalks throughout the community
• Develop Safe Routes to School Plans and follow through on
recommendations from existing plans
• Maintain the ped/bike system
• Urge MNDOT to follow through on trail on Dodd. Consider
upcoming road projects that could be paired with trail
development.
• Mendota Heights will consider adding sidewalks and trails
to existing roadways at the time of re-construction or
replacement.
COMPONENT PED BIKE FACILITY EXAMPLES
DAKOTA COUNTY
GREENWAYS
(off street, bituminous,
10’ wide trail, destination
trails)
• Mendota-Lebanon Hills
Regional Greenway
• Minnesota River Regional Greenway (incl. Big Rivers
Regional Trail)
• River to River Greenway
OFF STREET
BITUMINOUS TRAIL
(6’-8’ wide paved trail)
• Trail along Mendota Heights
Rd
• Trail along Wagon Wheel Rd
• Trail along portions of
Lexington Ave
WIDE SHOULDERS ON-
STREET
• Shoulders along Dodd Road
• Shoulders along Hwy 55
SIDEWALKS
(4-6’ wide concrete walks)
• Sidewalks in front of business
in The Village at Mendota
Heights
• Southeastern MH, along Field
Stone Drive and Watersedge Terrace
GRADE-SEPARATED
CROSSING • Tunnel under Hwy 62, east of Dodd Rd
AT-GRADE CROSSING • Painted markings on street,
cross walk, yellow alert
signage, flashing lights
PROTECTED BIKE
LANE
• On-street bike lanes that are
separated by plastic bollards
or concrete curb to provide
visual separation from traffic
Dakota County Greenways
Off Street Bituminous Trail
Wide Shoulders On-Street
Sidewalks
Underpass
At-Grade crossing
Protected bike lane
SYSTEM COMPONENTS
The physical infrastructure that makes up the bike and pedestrian system in Mendota Heights include the
following types of facilities:
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 199 of 238
26 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTRECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDED CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
Make improvements at the following recommended locations in order to improve
safety throughout the city. Employ elements, such as: enhanced crosswalk markings
and artistic crosswalks, pedestrian refuge islands, HAWK signals and lighting, warning
signage, speed bumps to slow traffic ahead of crossings, and other surface treatments.
A more detailed evaluation of each location is needed to identify the most effective
improvement. The locations in the table below were identified by public input and city
staff identification of proposed and planned projects.
Crosswalk reflectors
Pedestrian refuge island
HAWK crossing system
Artistic crosswalk design
ID PROJECT STATUS
PROJECT
PARTNERS
2 Crossing improvement at intersection of Chippewa
Ave and Annapolis St W
Planned City
3 Crossing improvement at intersection of Highway 13
and Annapolis St W
Pl;anned MNDOT
10 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Dodd Rd
Planned City / Dakota
County
12 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Emerson Ave
Planned City / Dakota
County
13 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Wentworth Ave
Planned City / Dakota
County
14 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Marie Ave
Planned City / Dakota
County
16 Crossing improvement at intersection of Emerson Ave
and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
Planned MNDOT
20 Crossing improvement at intersection of Sylvandale
Rd and Wachtler Ave
Proposed City
21 Crossing improvement at intersection of Riverside Ln
and Highway 13
Proposed MNDOT
23 Crossing improvement at intersection of Wentworth
Ave and Wachtler Ave
Completed City
26 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Preserve Path
Planned City / Dakota
County
27 Crossing improvement at intersection of Hilltop Rd
and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
Proposed MNDOT
28 Crossing improvement at intersection of Delaware
Ave (CR63) and Highway 62
Proposed MNDOT
31 Crossing improvement at intersection of Victoria
Curve and Highway 62
Proposed MNDOT
35 Crossing improvement at intersection of Lexington
Ave and Wagon Wheel
Proposed City
36 Grade-separated crossing improvement at
intersection of Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) at Highway
62, tunnel under TH 149 as part of River to River
Greenway
Planned City / MNDOT /
Dakota County
37 Crossing improvement at intersection of S Plaza Dr
and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
Proposed MNDOT
38 Crossing improvement at intersection of Wagon
Wheel Rd and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
Proposed MNDOT
41 Crossing improvement at intersection of Mendota Hts
Rd and Huber Dr
Proposed City
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 200 of 238
27 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
23
10
12
13
14
16
20
21
23
26
27
2831
35
36
37
38
41
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 201 of 238
28 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
Side slopes should be
vegetated with native
plantings to provide habitat
and visual interest
GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING
Tunnels and bridges can provide safe crossings for cyclists and
pedestrians under or over busy roadways. This facility is used
frequently along Dakota County greenways and provides a
continuous trail experience.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 202 of 238
29 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Pedestrian crossing signal
Intersection lighting
Pedestrian awareness signs
High-visibility crosswalk pattern with reflectors
Buffer separates
pedestrians from vehicular
traffic. Keep well-
maintained for turning vehicles
sight line
Pedestrian
refuge with
solar-powered crossing sign
STREET LIGHTING
Adequate lighting is important to pedestrian and bicyclist safety. This is
particularly true at intersections and road crossings that should be well lit
to improve safe crossings and reduce crashes with motor vehicles. Lighting
should be installed at all intersections and particularly at those intersections
that have regular pedestrian and bicycle crossing activity.
AT GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
Depending on the street configuration, street width, and whether or not
the crossing is at an intersection or mid-block location, a variety of at grade
crossing improvements may be utilized: highly visible crosswalk markings,
pedestrian refuge/island, lighting and HAWK signals, among other
improvements.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 203 of 238
30 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTRECOMMENDATIONSMultiuse paved trails
Striped paved shared use trails
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Local Bike Ped System
Offstreet Bituminous (6-8')
Planned Trail
Trail Gaps
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Local Bike Ped System
Offstreet Bituminous (6-8')
Planned Trail
Trail Gaps
Greenways
Potential Future
Greenway
Ex City Trail (Future
Greenway)
Local Bike Ped System
Offstreet Bituminous (6-8')
Planned Trail
Trail Gaps
RECOMMENDED TRAIL PROJECTS MAP
ID PROJECT STATUS PROJECT PARTNER
1 Future sidewalk on east side of Delaware Ave (CR63) connecting ex sidewalk to Dodd Rd Planned City / Dakota County
4 Future sidewalk on south side of Annapolis St W between Chippewa Ave and Delaware Ave Proposed City
7 Future trail connection from Ivy Hills Park to Brompton Pl cul-de-sac Not Feasible City
8 Future trail connection along Highway 13 from Sylvandale Rd to Annapolis St W Proposed MNDOT
11 Future trail connection along Delaware Ave (CR63) between Dodd Rd and Marie Ave Planned City / Dakota County
15 Future trail connection along Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) between Delaware Ave and Wesley Ln Proposed City
18 Future trail connection between existing trail at Somerset Elementary and Sylvandale Rd Proposed City
22 Future trail connection along Highway 13 from Riverside Ln to Lilydaye Rd bridge Proposed MNDOT
24 Future trail connection along Wentworth Ave between Delaware Ave and Dodd Rd Proposed City / Dakota County
30 Future trail connection along Victoria Curve from Hunter Ln to Highway 62 intersection Planned City
32 Future trail connection along Pilot Knob Rd from Acacia Blvd to Sibley Memorial Highway Proposed City
34 Future trail connection along Lexington Ave from Cullen Ave to Highway 62 Proposed City / Dakota County
39 Future trail connection along S Plaza Dr from Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) to N Plaza Dr Planned City
42 Future trail connection Delaware Ave (CR63) between Highway 62 and Huber Drive Proposed City / Dakota County
RECOMMENDED TRAIL PROJECTS
The following projects are planned or proposed off-street trails that would enhance connectivity in the
city. These projects will be completed by the city, or in partnership with Dakota County, or MNDOT as
appropriate. Planned trails have been identified as an upcoming project, while proposed trails may fill trail
gaps or be otherwise desired, but have not yet been identified as an upcoming project.
Protected bike lanes are not specifically recommended within this plan, but could be considered as a
facility option where there is not space for a physically separated trail facility.
1
4
7
8
11
15
1822
24
30
32 34 39 42
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 204 of 238
31 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
SIDEWALKS
Local Bike Ped System
Existing Sidewalk
Lilydale Pedestrian Trail (outside Mendota Hts)
Dodge Nature Center Trails
Local Bike Ped System
Existing Sidewalk
Lilydale Pedestrian Trail (outside Mendota Hts)
Dodge Nature Center Trails
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
SIDEWALKS
Few sidewalks exist in the city today due
to several housing developments having
been constructed without them. New
sidewalks are proposed at two locations in
the northern, urban part of the city.
As sidewalks are meant to be used
by pedestrians and not cyclists,
recommended investments are focused
on providing more multi-use trails in the
community. In general, as redevelopment
or new development occurs, the city
should recommend sidewalks be installed
to add connectivity to the city.
The Lilydale Pedestrian Trail is a City of
Lilydale project.
School crossing with patrol
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Recommendations from previous Safe Routes to School planning are listed
on pages 12 and 13 of this report. Collaborate with school partners to
continue implementing completed Safe Routes to School Plans.
Crosswalk striping
Winter trail and sidewalk care
BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
Several comments from the public engagement process indicated a desire
for better trail maintenance in the city. Throughout the spring, fall, and
winter, weather may affect trail surfaces and impact the usability for some
user groups, especially those who bike or roll. It is recommended that the
city make it a priority to routinely evaluate trails, and other bike and ped
facility conditions and make improvements where necessary.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 205 of 238
32 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTRECOMMENDATIONSFigure 1. New Trails
2’ mown edge/clear zone
on both side os the trail
for maintained feel
Wayside Rest Areas could
consist of wayfinding signage,
shade structures, trash and
recycling bins, pet waste
stations, restrooms, bike
parking, seating, bike repair
stands, and other amenitiesWhen used, trail
striping can help direct
the flow of traffic and
illustrates allowed uses
DAKOTA COUNTY GREENWAYS
Off-street bituminous trails, multi-use
trails, and shared-use paths are paved
routes, typically 10 feet wide that can
be used by bicyclists, walkers, runners,
rollerbladers, and other non-motorized
users.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 206 of 238
33 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Vegetative trail buffer
helps separate bikes
and pedestrians from
vehicular traffic, instilling
a greater sense of
safety while offering
opportunities for
landscaping, lighting,
and signage
Pedestrian-scale lighting
helps trail users feel secure
any time of day
SHARED-USE PATHS
Off-street bituminous trails, multi-use
trails, and shared-use paths are paved
routes, typically 8-10 feet wide that can
be used by bicyclists, walkers, runners,
rollerbladers, and other non-motorized
users.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 207 of 238
34 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTRECOMMENDATIONSPROTECTED BIKE LANES
These facilities can be used in road
corridors where there is not sufficient
right-of-way to add a separate shared-
use path.
Bollards help separate bikes and
pedestrians from vehicle traffic,
increasing sense of safety and
security along the trail
High-visability road
markings
5’ PROTECTED BIKE LANE
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 208 of 238
35 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
DESIRED TRAIL CONNECTIONS
Local Bike Ped System
Desired Trail Connections
(Public Identified as Desired Future Trail Connections,
Areas Contain Feasibility Issues)
Local Bike Ped System
Desired Trail Connections
(Public Identified as Desired Future Trail Connections,
Areas Contain Feasibility Issues)
Crossings / Improvements
Existing Tunnel
Existing At Grade Xing (East/West)
Existing At Grade Xing (North/South)
Existing Bridge Crossing
Existing At Grade Xing (Both Ways)
Proposed Dak Co. Tunnel
Proposed At-Grade X-ing Enhancement
New Wayfinding Sign
ID PROJECT PROJECT TYPE STATUS
6 Future trail connection along Butler Ave W between Chippewa and Ivy
Hills Park
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
9 Future trail connection along Highway 13 from Wachtler Ave to
Sylvandale Rd
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
25 Future trail connection along Wachtler Ave from Wentworth Ave to
existing Valley Park trail
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
27 Crossing improvement at intersection of Hilltop Rd and Dodd Rd (Hwy
149)
At-grade crossing
enhancement
Challenging
29 Future trail connection along Lexington Ave from Douglas Rd to Highway
13
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
33 Future trail connection along Lexington Ave from Wagon Wheel Rd to
Cullen Ave
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
40 Future trail connection along Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) between Mendota Hts
Rd and Interstate 494
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
43 Future trail connection Delaware Ave (CR63) between Wagon Wheel Rd
and Interstate 494
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging
DESIRED TRAIL CONNECTIONS
Due to several potential physical challenges, such as topography, land ownership/narrow right-of-
way, and others, the following projects are identified as desirable, but challenging to construct. This
list is included in the plan as these trail connections were identified by community members during
the public engagement process. If in the future, there is potential funding or other opportunities to
construct these trails, they may shift to proposed or planned trails.
6
9
25
27
29
33
40
43
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 209 of 238
36 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
ENCOURAGEMENT
Encourage community members and visitors of Mendota Heights to
participate in walking, biking and rolling though advertising and promotional
campaigns, outreach, programs and events.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Develop an online map of ped/bike routes and loops: post the information at
local bike shops, in the lobby of City Hall, and at local retail destinations
• Provide information about destinations and distances by foot and by bike
throughout the city to encourage residents to make local trips without
vehicles.
• Encourage community-wide Bike to Work or Bike to School days to encourage
those who may not typically bike commute to give it a try and potentially
continue the practice.
• Work with employers, schools, or retailers to offer incentives for those who
bike or walk commute.
• Continue to organize and promote local bike events, such as Folks on Spokes,
where community members gather to participate in a monthly bike ride. The
rides are casual and social events with routes that range between seven and
15 miles.
• Partner with adjacent communities (Lilydale, Mendota, West St. Paul, South St.
Paul, St. Paul, and Eagan) to provide and promote information and programs
about biking and walking throughout the area.
• Continue ongoing communication with the Thompson Park Activity Center
walking group to encourage walking in Mendota Heights and to respond to
desires for facilities and amenities.
Bike or walk to school days
Bike to work days
Encouragement via marketing materials
Reward programsRECOMMENDATIONS City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 210 of 238
37 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Pet control
Enforcing rules of the road
ENFORCEMENT
It is important that local law enforcement provide support for both motorized
and non-motorized users and appropriately enforce rules and laws to keep
people safe, while keeping in mind that enforcement can impact specific
populations disportionately.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Work with law enforcement officers to identify methods that will ensure
drivers and bicyclists follow the rules of the road or issue penalties.
• Evaluate speed limits within the community to identify corridors where speed
limits should be reduced to enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety.
• Promote the policy that dog walkers need to control their dogs while walking
on trails and other facilities. Dogs should not be off-leash while walking on
public trails.
• Post trail etiquette signs along trails that identify penalties for not following
local laws.
• Develop a policy for E-bikes on trails.
Pet rules signage
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 211 of 238
38 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
Addressing language barriers
Following ADA standards
Public transportation access to facilities
Map of the Existing Transit System from the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan UpdateRECOMMENDATIONSEQUITY
Communities must create traffic codes and rules that treat non-motorized
movers as equal users of the transportation system to motorized vehicles.
There should be equal access to facilities and destinations for all movement
types and abilities.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Review policies and practices within the community to ensure that community
members of all ages and abilities are able to access bike and ped facilities.
• Evaluate access to non-motorized transportation facilities, including transit
routes and stops (see map below from the city’s Comprehensive Plan update),
especially near senior housing and multi-family housing.
• Adopt a Complete Streets policy and follow it for all new locally constructed
roads in the city.
• Follow the 8 to 80 rule. Design local roads to work for all members of society,
from age 8 up to age 80 and everyone in between.
• Ensure all facilities are designed to meet ADA accessibility standards.
• Consider signage with symbology or multiple languages where appropriate.
• Prioritize areas around schools and high density residential housing when
implementing bike and pedestrian facilities.
Accessible design details
Chapter 3 - Transportation
City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
20
Transportation services for seniors and persons with disabilities is provided by Dakota Areas
Resources and Transportation for Seniors. DARTS Loop Transportation services are provided in
the neighboring communities of West St. Paul and South St. Paul, which offers transit options
for residents tailored to the community preferences, with affordable all-you-can ride fares, and
allows riders to get on and off any stops along a continuous one-hour LOOP route. The City of
Mendota Heights should explore or seek reliable transit and transportation alternatives for its
residents, especially as the community’s population ages.
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVERMINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RD417
417
415446
436
436
446
415 470470446
452
452
480
484
489
446
75
417
436
446
446
417
446
417 DELAWARE AVEDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMARIE AVE W
LEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RDHUBER DR
SI
BL
EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND DR
WENTWORTH AVE WWACHTLER AVEWAGON WHEEL TRLHUNTER LNORCHARD PL
VICTORIA RD SIVY FALLS AVE
Existing Transit Mapµ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
Transit Stops
Transit Routes
Planned Express Bus Corridor
City of Mendota Heights
Open Water
City of Mendota Heights
Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016
June 2019
FIGURE 3-3
Created: June 2019, Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016
Map 3-3. Existing Transit System
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER
MINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RD
417
417
415446
436
436
446
415 470470446
452
452
480
484
489
446
75
417
436
446
446
417
446
417 DELAWARE AVEDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
MARIE
A
V
E
W
LEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD
HUBER
D
R
SI
BL
EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND
D
R
WENTWORTH
A
V
E
WWACHTLER AVE
WAGON
W
H
E
E
L
T
R
LHUNTER LN
ORCHARD
P
L
VICTORIA RD S
IVY FALLS AVE
Existing Transit Mapµ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
Transit Stops
Transit Routes
Planned Express Bus Corridor
City of Mendota Heights
Open Water
City of Mendota Heights
Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016
June 2019
FIGURE 3-3
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER
MINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RD
417
417
415446
436
436
446
415 470470446
452
452
480
484
489
446
75
417
436
446
446
417
446
417 DELAWARE AVEDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
MARIE
A
V
E
W
LEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD
HUBER
D
R
SI
BLEYMEMORIALNORTHLAND
D
R
WENTWORTH
A
V
E
WWACHTLER AVE
WAGON
W
H
E
E
L
T
R
LHUNTER LN
ORCHARD
P
L
VICTORIA RD S
IVY FALLS AVE
Existing Transit Mapµ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
Transit Stops
Transit Routes
Planned Express Bus Corridor
City of Mendota Heights
Open Water
City of Mendota Heights
Source: Metropolitan Council, 2016
June 2019
FIGURE 3-3
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 212 of 238
39 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Safe trails and sidewalks in all developments
Bench seating
Shade trees
Vegetative buffer
EXPERIENCE
The experience of walking or biking to destinations for transportation,
exercise, or leisure, should be enjoyable. Making transportation an experience
by design for both motor and non-motor vehicles is important to encouraging
use of trails and bikeways. The design of bike and pedestrian facilities should
include considerations of safety, views, destinations, shade, noise, and other
factors, as appropriate.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Promote outdoor recreation by designing high quality trail experiences
within the community. Include amenities along trails to provide supportive
experiences:
-Shade trees that provide protection from the sun and buffer noise from traffic
-Bench seating at trailheads, parks, and along the trail to support long walking and
biking trips
-Vegetative buffers and native plantings that provide habitat and stormwater
management in urban and developed areas
-In narrow street corridors, provide a physical barrier between bike lanes and traffic in
order to create a safer experience
• Work with Dakota County to develop, enhance, and promote the greenway
system:
-The greenways are a connected network of off-road, multi-use trails.
-Greenway trails connect to other local, regional, and state trails in order to provide
loops of various distances for users of all ages and abilities.
-Greenways connect schools, parks, civic locations, and commercial and retail
destinations, in order to provide corridors for commuting and recreation.
-Greenway corridors provide habitat restoration areas and water quality
improvements that benefit the environment.
• Recognize that Mendota Heights is a poorly lit community, where there are
few streetlights. The lack of night time lighting impacts early morning and
evening walkers and cyclers in the spring and fall seasons. Consider the
following:
-Install additional safety measures, such as warning signage for vehicles to watch
out for non-motorized users.
-Encourage night time walkers and cyclers to have their own lights and wear
reflective clothing.
Hardscape buffer
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 213 of 238
40 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
Campaigns
Making decisions
Sharing the road
Complete Streets PolicyRECOMMENDATIONS ETHICS
Community leaders and decision makers should prioritize all members of the
community, all ages and abilities, all income levels, and all backgrounds –
with special attention to historically marginalized communities – in order to
provide comprehensive community services. Ethics includes a values-based
decision-making process that is centered on ethics, empathy, and equity.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Transparent decision-making and public engagement will encourage
community members to encourage public officials to value biking and walking
facilities on an equal level with motorized facilities.
• When developing city budgets, give equal weight to developing, repairing,
and maintaining bicycle and pedestrian facilities as to streets and roads.
• Develop and implement policies that support walking and bicycling in the city.
•
9
Chapter 2 - Land Use & Growth
City of Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER
MINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
MARIE
A
V
E
W
MENDOTA
H
E
I
G
H
T
S
R
DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD
HUBER
D
R
SI
BL
EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND
D
R
WENTWORTH
A
V
E
WWACHTLER AVE
WAGON
W
H
E
E
L
T
R
L
MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN
ORCHARD
P
L
VICTORIA RD S
IVY FALLS AVE
Existing Land Use Map
City of Mendota Heights
µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
June 2019
Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017
FIGURE 2-2
Park/Open Space
Mixed-Use - PUD
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Mixed Use - PUD
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Parks/Open Space
Golf Course
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
City Boundary
City Boundary
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public/Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Golf Course: Large/Small
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
Map 2-2. Existing Land Use
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVERMINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMARIE AVE W
MENDOTA HEIGHTS RDLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RDHUBER DR
SI
BL
EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND DR
WENTWORTH AVE WWACHTLER AVEWAGON WHEEL TRL
MENDOTA RDHUNTER LNORCHARD PL
VICTORIA RD SIVY FALLS AVE
Existing Land Use Map
City of Mendota Heights
µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
June 2019
Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017
FIGURE 2-2
Park/Open Space
Mixed-Use - PUD
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Mixed Use - PUD
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Parks/Open Space
Golf Course
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
City Boundary
City Boundary
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Golf Course
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
Created June 2019, Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017
MENDOTA
LILYDALE PICKEREL LAKEMISSISSIPPI RIVER
MINNESO
T
A
RI
V
E
R
ROGERS LAKELAKE AUGUSTA
LA
K
E
L
EMA
Y
GUN CLUB LAKE DODD RDDODD RDDELAWARE AVESIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY
MARIE
A
V
E
W
MENDOTA
H
E
I
G
H
T
S
R
DLEXINGTON AVELILYDALE RDPILOT KNOB RD
HUBER
D
R
SI
BL
EYMEMORIALNORTHLAND
D
R
WENTWORTH
A
V
E
WWACHTLER AVE
WAGON
W
H
E
E
L
T
R
L
MENDOTA RDHUNTER LN
ORCHARD
P
L
VICTORIA RD S
IVY FALLS AVE
Existing Land Use Map
City of Mendota Heights
µ0 3,000 6,000 Feet
June 2019
Source: City of Mendota Heights, 2017
FIGURE 2-2
Park/Open Space
Mixed-Use - PUD
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Mixed Use - PUD
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Parks/Open Space
Golf Course
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
City Boundary
City Boundary
Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential - PUD
High Density Residential
High Density Residential - PUD
Business
Limited Business
Industrial
City Facilities
Schools (Public Private)
Churches Synagogues
Cemetery
Golf Course
Right-of-Way
Open Water
Wetland
Map of the Existing Land Use, including High Density Residential areas and schools, from the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 214 of 238
41 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Trail use statistic tracking
Strava map
User surveys
Trail construction oversight
EVALUATION
Evaluation can include measurement of physical infrastructure and how
it is working, assessment of the community’s thoughts and desires for
improvements to existing facilities, and metrics related to use of facilities. This
Bike and Pedestrian Plan is an example of an evaluation method.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Continue to periodically survey the community and engage users to
determine if there are issues and opportunities for the bike and ped system.
• Quarterly measurement of the number of complaints or requests to city staff
regarding bike and trail facilities. Determine if complaints go up or down
during certain times of year or if there are particular issues that rise to the top
that are high priorities for investment.
• Consider utilizing digital tools, such as Strava or StreetLight, to determine
usership of particular routes within the community. Use the data to make
recommendations for improvements or follow up with surveys to understand
the data.
• Conduct Walk Audits regularly to assess pedestrian safety, accessibility, and
comfort in certain areas of the community. Choose different areas each season.
Include public officials, city staff, and local community members of differing
ages and abilities to attend and conduct the Walk Audit.
-Utilize the tools and resources provided by the organization America Walks,
including videos on how to conduct a Walk Audit: https://americawalks.org
• Determine if the system is providing valuable and accessible facilities; evaluate
the number of users of the ped/bike system.
Trail use statistic tracking
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 215 of 238
42 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFT
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATIONPROJECT PRIORITIES
A number of physical infrastructure projects have been identified in this plan to create a
connected bike and ped system in Mendota Heights. The projects are organized by the
following priority levels:
• High Priority projects are easily implementable/feasible, or highly desired by the public and
stakeholders, or already planned or funded by the city or other agencies.
• Medium Priority projects may need more planning or aren’t as highly desired by the
community.
• Low Priority projects could include high cost infrastructure improvements or technically
challenging projects to implement.
As opportunities arise, such as a road construction project that can include trails, or new
funding, some projects may shift priority levels.
Within each project priority list, supplemental information is provided about the projects:
• ID: This number is used to locate the project on the Priority Projects Map on the following page.
• Project: Description of what and where the project is.
• Project Type: This correlates to the project types in the recommendations section (At-grade
crossing enhancement; New paved ped/bike connection, off-street; New wayfinding signage,
etc.)
• Status: This identifies how far along in the planning and implementation phases the project is.
-Planned projects have been identified by the city or another agency as a project that will be
implemented within a certain timeframe. Many of these projects have funding sources identified.
-Proposed projects have been identified by staff, community members, or elected officials as projects that
are desired, but they have not been officially funded or listed in a timeline for implementation.
-Challenging projects are desired for community connectivity, but have challenges associated with
physical constructability, high cost to implement, land use, or other issues.
• Project Partners indicates whether the City of Mendota Heights or another public agency or
organization will be responsible for implementing the project. Many of these projects will require
collaboration and partnership among agencies because they involve multiple ownership and
jurisdiction of existing rights-of-way and public space.
-City = City of Mendota Heights Public Works
-County = Dakota County Physical Development Department
-MNDOT = Minnesota Department of Transportation
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 216 of 238
43 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
PRIORITY PROJECTS MAP
(SEE TABLES ON FOLLOWING PAGES FOR NUMBERED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS)
1
23 4
5
67
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16 17181920
2122
23 24
25
26
27
28
29
3031
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 41
42
43
44
45
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 217 of 238
44 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTIMPLEMENTATIONIDPROJECTPROJECT TYPE STATUS PROJECT PARTNERS
PRIORITY LEVEL
10 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Delaware Ave (CR63) and Dodd Rd
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned MNDOT / Dakota
County
High
11 Future trail connection along Delaware Ave
(CR63) between Dodd Rd and Marie Ave
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Planned City / Dakota County High
12 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Delaware Ave (CR63) and Emerson Ave
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned City / Dakota County High
13 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Delaware Ave (CR63) and Wentworth Ave
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned City / Dakota County High
14 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Delaware Ave (CR63) and Marie Ave
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned City / Dakota County High
15 Future trail connection along Dodd Rd
(Hwy 149) between Delaware Ave and
Wesley Ln
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Proposed City High
16 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Emerson Ave and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned MNDOT High
19 Future trail connection along Sylvandale Rd
between Ivy Hills Park and Wachtler Ave
On-street trail markings /
signage
Proposed City High
26 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Delaware Ave (CR63) and Preserve Path
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned City / Dakota County High
30 Future trail connection along Victoria Curve
from Hunter Ln to Highway 62 intersection
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Planned City High
33 Future trail connection along Lexington
Ave from Wagon Wheel Rd to Cullen Ave
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Not Feasible City / Dakota County High
36 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) at Highway 62 / tunnel
under TH 149 in coordination with River to
River Greenway trail
Grade-separated crossing Planned City / MNDOT /
Dakota County
(greenway
coordination)
High
37 Crossing improvement at intersection of S
Plaza Dr and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
At-grade crossing enhancement Planned City High
39 Future trail connection along S Plaza Dr
from Dodd Rd (Hwy 149) to N Plaza Dr
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Planned City High
44 New wayfinding signage at intersection of
S Plaza Dr and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
New wayfinding signage Proposed City High
45 New wayfinding signage at Apache St cul-
de-sac
New wayfinding signage Proposed City High
HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS LIST
High Priority projects are easily implementable/feasible, or highly desired by the public and
stakeholders, or already planned or funded by the city or other agencies. Coordination and partnership
will be needed to accomplish these projects.
In the public engagement process, safety of the trail system, especially safe road crossings, were a
big concern for residents. Therefore, several road crossing enhancements are listed as high priority
projects. For all proposed crossing improvements, the proposed project should be reviewed in the
context of existing or proposed connection trails. Current Dakota County guidance recommends that
crossing considerartions considerations should be part of any trail evaluation using. Depending on the
pedestrian activity, enhancements may not be applicable at all locations noted.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 218 of 238
45 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
ID PROJECT PROJECT TYPE STATUS PROJECT PARTNERS
PRIORITY LEVEL
1 Future sidewalk on east side of
Delaware Ave (CR63) connecting ex
sidewalk to Dodd Rd
New paved bike/ped connection,
off-street
Planned City / Dakota County Medium
2 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Chippewa Ave and Annapolis St W
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed MNDOT Medium
3 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Highway 13 and Annapolis St W
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed MNDOT Medium
4 Future sidewalk on south side of
Annapolis St W between Chippewa
Ave and Delaware Ave
New paved bike/ped connection,
off-street
Proposed City Medium
8 Future trail connection along Highway
13 from Sylvandale Rd to Annapolis
St W
New paved bike/ped connection,
off-street
Proposed MNDOT Medium
18 Future trail connection between
existing trail at Somerset Elementary
and Sylvandale Rd
On-street trail markings /
signage
Proposed City Medium
20 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Emerson Ave and Wachtler Ave
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed City Medium
21 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Riverside Ln and Highway 13
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed MNDOT Medium
22 Future trail connection along Highway
13 from Riverside Ln to Lilydaye Rd
bridge
New paved bike/ped connection,
off-street
Proposed MNDOT Medium
23 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Wentworth Ave and Wachtler Ave
At-grade crossing enhancement Completed City / Dakota County Medium
28 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Delaware Ave (CR63) and Highway
62
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed MNDOT / City / Dakota
County
Medium
32 Future trail connection along Pilot
Knob Rd from Acacia Blvd to Sibley
Memorial Highway
Surface improvements to
existing paved trail
Proposed City Medium
34 Future trail connection along
Lexington Ave from Cullen Ave to
Highway 62
Surface improvements to
existing paved trail
Proposed City / Dakota County Medium
35 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Lexington Ave and Wagon Wheel
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed City Medium
38 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Wagon Wheel Rd and Dodd Rd
(Hwy 149)
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed City Medium
41 Crossing improvement at intersection
of Mendota Hts Rd and Huber Dr
At-grade crossing enhancement Proposed City Medium
42 Future trail connection Delaware
Ave (CR63) between Highway 62 and
Wagon Wheel Rd
New paved bike/ped connection,
off-street
Proposed City / Dakota County Medium
MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECTS LIST
Medium Priority projects may need more planning than high priority projects, they
may cost more, or they aren’t as highly desired by the community.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 219 of 238
46 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTADRAFTRECOMMENDATIONSLOW PRIORITY PROJECTS LIST
Low Priority projects could include high cost infrastructure
improvements or technically challenging projects to implement.
ID PROJECT PROJECT TYPE STATUS PROJECT PARTNERS
PRIORITY LEVEL
5 Future trail connection along Chippewa
Ave between Annapolis St W and Dodd
Rd
On-street trail markings
/ signage
Proposed City Low
6 Future trail connection along Butler Ave
W between Chippewa and Ivy Hills Park
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging City Low
7 Future trail connection from Ivy Hills
Park to Brompton Pl cul-de-sac
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging City Low
9 Future trail connection along Highway
13 from Wachtler Ave to Sylvandale Rd
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging MNDOT Low
17 Future trail connection along Emerson
Ave between Delaware Ave (CR 63) and
Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Proposed City Low
24 Future trail connection along Wentworth
Ave between Delaware Ave and Dodd
Rd
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Proposed City / Dakota
County
Low
25 Future trail connection along Wachtler
Ave from Wentworth Ave to existing
Valley Park trail
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging City Low
27 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Hilltop Rd and Dodd Rd (Hwy 149)
At-grade crossing
enhancement
Challenging MNDOT Low
29 Future trail connection along Lexington
Ave Douglas Rd to Highway 13
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging City / Dakota
County
Low
31 Crossing improvement at intersection of
Victoria Curve and Highway 62
At-grade crossing
enhancement
Proposed MNDOT Low
40 Future trail connection along Dodd Rd
(Hwy 149) between Mendota Hts Rd and
Interstate 494
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging MNDOT Low
43 Future trail connection Delaware Ave
(CR63) between Wagon Wheel Rd and
Interstate 494
New paved bike/ped
connection, off-street
Challenging City / Dakota
County
Low
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 220 of 238
47 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES &
FUNDING SOURCES
In order to implement new programs and construct the recommendations
that are identified in this plan, new funding will be needed. There are potential
grant funding sources, listed below, along with investments by other agencies,
namely Dakota County and MNDOT.
FUNDING SOURCES
Potential funding sources include existing city funds as well as outside grant
funding.
FUNDING SOURCE DESCRIPTION
General
Funds
-Primary source for on-going maintenance, operations, and amenities for the
bike and pedestrian system
-Capital improvements can also be funded through general funds
-Often used as a match for grant funding
Dedicated
Tax Levy
-A city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed
specifically for trails.
-Can be used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance
-Proceeds may be in place of or supplement general funds
-The advantage of a dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation receives a
more stable source of funding and does not have to compete with other city
priorities for funding on an annual basis.
Bonding -General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds provide another source of
implementation funding for new facilities, and in some cases, can provide
funding for repairs and upgrades of existing facilities.
-Residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary
tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway
improvements and maintenance. These funds are usually provided through
bonds approved as part of a voter referendum.
State Aid
Funds
-State aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on state
aid roadways. This funding source is particularly useful at the time of street
construction or reconstruction.
Partnerships -Public and private partnerships can provide funding opportunities beyond
the traditional municipal models. Partnerships with Dakota County have
contributed to the existing trail network. Potential partnerships with the
School District, Community Education, and local businesses can help with
implementation of events and programming, and can support future grant
writing efforts.
-Organizations with partner funding can also provide assistance with
design, outreach, or maintenance/stewardship of facilities. Partnerships and
relationships with local businesses can result in easements, use agreements, or
donated funds for future bike and ped facilities.
Donations -Private donations may be from individuals or area corporations, or donations
of labor from recreation clubs or use agreements. “Adopt-a-Trail” programs,
memorial bench donations, and incentives for local businesses to provide bike
racks are all examples of how organizations, businesses, and individuals could
help with maintenance and funding, while raising awareness and enthusiasm
of the bike/ped system.
Grants • Safe Routes to School Grants (MnDOT) (see sidebar at right)
• Regional Solicitation Grants for Bike/Ped Facilities (see sidebar at right)
• Local Trail Connections (LTC): Administered through the MNDNR; funding
prioritizes projects with significant connectivity, high expected use, and
attractive integration of cultural and natural resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/trails_local.html
• MN DNR Natural and Scenic Area Grants: Projects must align with the State
Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). This grant is typically available annually,
with an application deadline in early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/land/natural-scenic-app-cycle.html
• MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grants: Projects must align with the State
Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). Example projects include internal park
trails and trail amenities. This grant is typically available annually, with an
application deadline in early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/outdoor_rec.html
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS) IMPLEMENTATION
It is highly recommended that the city
applies for SRTS Planning Assistance
through MnDOT to complete a
District-wide plan or individual SRTS
plans for those schools that don’t
currently have a SRTS Plan.
• Next round of grant applications
are due January 11, 2023.
• Link to application:
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/
saferoutes/grants-funding.html
Other MnDOT SRTS grant
opportunities can fund programs
(boost grants) or other infrastructure
improvements (infrastructure grants).
Note that Infrastructure Grant
applications require more effort to
complete and should be closer to
‘shovel’ ready projects. Generally, the
improvements need to be identified
through a SRTS planning process.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL SOLICITATION GRANTS
The Metropolitan Council allocates
federal funds through Regional
Solicitation Grants. Funding priorities
include RBTN priority corridors,
multi-use trails, bicycle facilities,
grade-separated crossings, filling
network gaps, intersection/crossing
treatments, sidewalks, streetscaping,
ADA improvements, and Safe Routes
to School infrastructure projects.
These grants are available on
2-year funding cycle, with the next
solicitation for grant applications
anticipated in early 2024.
https://metrocouncil.org/
Transportation/Planning-2/
Transportation-Funding/
Regional-Solicitation-NEW.aspx
Dodd Road and regional greenway
trails qualify for regional solicitation
and should be included in applications
each year they are available.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 221 of 238
Riding bicycles will
not only benefit the
individual doing
it, but the world at
large.
- Udo E. Simonis
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 222 of 238
Request for City Council Action
DATE: November 1, 2022
TO: Mayor Levine and City Council; City Administrator Jacobson
FROM: Tim Benetti, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution 2022-82 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to Twin City Racquet & Squash
Club - 1415 Mendota Heights Road (Planning Case No. 2022-22]
INTRODUCTION
The City Council is asked to adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit (CUP) to Twin City
Racquet & Squash Club, which would approve a new commercial recreation use in the I-Industrial District,
located at 1415 Mendota Heights Road.
BACKGROUND
Drop Shot, LLC is seeking permission to place a new indoor recreational facility, which will include
pickleball, squash and padel courts, along with a fitness area and indoor golf simulator, to be located in a
vacant warehouse space within the Airport Industrial Center building. This facility is intended to be a
private/members only club. Commercial recreation uses such as this athletic/paddleball club requires a
conditional use permit in the I-Industrial District.
On October 25, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this item, whereby a
planning report was presented and received by the commission, and comments from the Applicant and
public were given. Copies of this report and corresponding Planning Commission meeting minutes are
appended to this memo.
DISCUSSION
The City can use its quasi-judicial authority when considering action on zoning related requests, including
conditional use permits, and has broad discretion. The only limitations are that actions and findings must
be constitutional, rational, and related to protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended unanimously (7-0 vote) to approve the CUP to Drop Shot, LLC
and for the proposed Twin City Racquet & Squash Club facility, with findings-of-fact to support said
approval and with certain conditions.
ACTION REQUIRED
Affirm the recommendation from the Planning Commission by adopting RESOLUTION NO. 2022-82,
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE
(TWIN CITY RACQUET AND SQUASH CLUB) IN THE I-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT
1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD.
This adoption action requires a simple majority vote.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 223 of 238 9a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2022-82
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW COMMERCIAL RECREATION USE IN THE I-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
LOCATED AT 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
[PLANNING CASE NO. 2022-22]
WHEREAS, Drop Shot, LLC (the “Applicant) in conjunction with Lamar, LLC (the
“Owners”) requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) under Planning Case No. 2022-
22, which would allow a new commercial recreation use to be placed inside the Airport Industrial
Center building, located at 1415 Mendota Heights Road, and legally described on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is guided Industrial in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
and is zoned I-Industrial; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 12-1G-2 allows certain “commercial recreation” uses by
conditional use permit in the Industrial District, and the proposed athletic/racquet club meets the
qualifications and definitions as a recreational participative athletic use, fitness center, training
facility and golf simulator, or similar use; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this planning case item, whereby a planning report was presented and received
by the commission, and comments from the Applicant and public were allowed, and whereupon
closing the hearing, recommended unanimously (7-0 vote) to approve the request from Drop Shot,
LLC for the CUP, which would allow the proposed athletic/racquet club facility, located at 1415
Mendota Heights Road, as proposed and presented under Planning Case No. 2022-22, with specific
finding-of-fact to support said approval and with related conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council that
that request from Drop Shot, LLC for the CUP, which would allow the proposed athletic/racquet
club facility, located at 1415 Mendota Heights Road, as proposed and presented under Planning
Case No. 2022-22, may be approved based on the following findings-of-fact:
A. The proposed conditional use allowing the new commercial recreational use (Twin
City Racquet and Squash Club) in the Industrial District will not be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor cause any serious traffic
congestion or hazards, nor depreciate surrounding property values.
B. The new recreational use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the zoning
code and comprehensive plan, including I-Industrial District performance
standards.
C. The proposed recreational use on the subject property should not impact or
negatively affect the required parking needs of the Applicant’s business needs or
the other leased tenant or future tenant needs on the site.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 224 of 238
Res. 2022-82 Page 2 of 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mendota Heights City Council, that the request
from Drop Shot, LLC for the CUP, which would allow the proposed athletic/racquet club facility,
located at 1415 Mendota Heights Road, as proposed and presented under Planning Case No. 2022-
22, is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1. All racquet or athletic activities shall be conducted entirely within the enclosed
building. The outdoor padel court shown on the submitted site plan is not approved
and will not be allowed under this CUP approval.
2. The 24 parking spaces located on the back side of the building and the 16 spaces
located on the east edge of the existing parking area, as illustrated on the site plan
must all be striped.
3. Outdoor storage and display of materials is prohibited.
4. A sign permit shall be required prior to installation of any additional tenant signage
on the subject parcel/building. No banner or temporary signs will be allowed.
5. A building permit shall be required prior to any applicable demolition or tenant
space improvements.
6. No on-street parking or blocking of loading areas is allowed.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1st day of November, 2022.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
________________________________
Mayor Stephanie Levine
ATTEST
________________________________
Christine Lusian, City Clerk
Drafted by: City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 225 of 238
Res. 2022-82 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Property Address: 1415 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights MN 55120
PID: 27-03300-78-070
Legal Description:
THE NORTH 430.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1,750 FEET OF THE EAST 660 FEET OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 1 & 2, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 40 FEET, SECTION 33 TOWNSHIP 28
RANGE 23, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA; AND EXCLUDING PARCEL NO. 46D OF
MINNESOTA DOT R/W MAP 19-93.
[Abstract Property]
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 226 of 238
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 25, 2022
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Tim Benetti, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Planning Case 2022-22
Conditional Use Permit – Commercial Recreation Use
APPLICANT: Drop Shot, LLC / Lamar, LLC (Owners)
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1415 Mendota Heights Road
ZONING/GUIDED: I-Industrial / I Industrial
ACTION DEADLINE: December 6, 2022
INTRODUCTION
The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit (CUP) to place a new indoor athletic club facility inside
a vacant space within an existing multi-tenant building, located at 1415 Mendota Heights Road. The
proposed name of the facility is Twin City Racquet & Squash Club.
The property is generally located at the northwest corner of Mendota Heights Road and Pilot Knob Road
and is situated in the I-Industrial district. City Code Section 12-1G-2 allows certain defined “commercial
recreation” uses by means of a conditional use permit in the Industrial District.
This item is being presented under a duly noticed public hearing process. A notice of hearing on this item
was published in the Pioneer Press; and notice letters of this hearing were mailed to all owners within 350-
feet of the subject property. The city has not received any comments (for or against) this project.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is generally identified as the “Airport Industrial Center.” This property is 5.85 acres
in size, and has approximately 66,000-sq. ft. of multi-tenant office/industrial/storage space, with loading
bays to the rear (north) of the building. The site contains three access points off Mendota Hts. Road to the
south and one access off Pilot Knob Road to the east, with 106 marked or dedicated parking spaces spread
throughout the property.
The property currently houses For the Love of Dogs training facility (9,700 sf. of space, indoor dog diving
tank, 4 employees); BDS Systems (4,400-sf. of leased space, no employees, pallet/cold storage only) and
American Vets (9,600-sf. of leased space, two employees, pallet/cold storage only). The attached
commercial office use (the former Lancer Hospitality offices) on the west end of the building consists of
approximately 8,000-sf. of vacant office space.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 227 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 2 of 7
SCOPE of ACTIVITIES
The new indoor racquet club facility or use will take place inside the 21,200-sf. vacant storage/warehouse
space situated between the existing office space and the BDS/Am-Vets spaces. This facility will consist of
three (3) new pickleball courts, three (3) squash courts (singles and doubles); and three padel courts (note:
padel is described as a mix of tennis and pickleball played inside a plexi-walled court). The facility also
includes a social gathering space; fitness area; and a golf simulator, with locker/changing/shower rooms.
The facility is intended to be a private racquet and tennis club, with secured key-card access to the facility
by members only. Access will be restricted or limited to two separate doors opening on the north side of
the building. Club members will be able to reserve their preferred playing time or courts on-line through a
private membership website, and will be able to enter/exit at their own convenience. The facility does not
provide any stadium or large spectator seating. No food or beverage services will be provided, except for
private (interior only) vending machines.
The proposed club use will have unlimited hours and available to its members at any time. Based upon the
proposed court layouts, the pickleball and padel courts can provide up to 4 players (doubles) on each court;
and the squash can accommodate 1 to 2 or up to 4 players per court. Assuming all courts were maxed out
with players, this would mean up to 28 individuals could be playing or occupying the courts at one time.
The “social area” has space for approximately 30 members to sit or rest before, between or after games.
The fitness area and golf simulator areas are undefined or not detailed enough to gage accurate number of
occupancy or participation in these areas.
ANALYSIS of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Pursuant to Title 12-1L-6, any use allowed by a conditional use permit in a particular zoning district requires
submittal of a complete development or site plan for full consideration by the planning commission and
city council. The [city] council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the planning commission
and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and welfare of occupants or surrounding lands,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets, and the effect of
the proposed use on the comprehensive plan.
As previously indicated, City Code Section 12-1G-2 allows certain “commercial recreation” uses by
conditional use permit in the Industrial District, and such use(s) are defined as follows:
RECREATION, COMMERCIAL: Recreational instruction and participative athletic uses, including
jump/trampoline center, golf range/simulator, fitness center, sports training facility, martial arts
school, dance school, and similar uses.
Staff interprets the use as qualifying for a conditional use permit under the “commercial recreation”
definition as a recreational participative athletic use, fitness center, training facility and golf simulator,
[and/or] similar use.
The City may grant a conditional use provided the following standards are met or proven:
a) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community;
b) will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards;
c) will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and
d) the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and the
comprehensive plan.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 228 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 3 of 7
A. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the
community, nor will cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will seriously depreciate
surrounding property value.
Applicant’s Reponses: a) On the contrary, we believe the creation of our proposed racquet courts
will enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. These sports contribute to a
healthy lifestyle and recreation and will provide an opportunity to local residents to participate in sports
that have an easy entry level and general popularity; and
b) we don't anticipate any serious traffic congestion nor hazards caused by the creation of a racquets
club. Our building as roughly 100 parking spots which is more than adequate to support folks reserving
court time; and
c) we believe that the creation of indoor racquet courts will positively impact the surrounding property
values by bringing something of value to the community.
Staff Response: Staff agrees and does not believe the proposed racquet club use at this location will be
detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community, as they will be simply taking over and
remodeling a vacant industrial warehouse space inside an existing “mixed-use” facility. This building-
like many others in the Industrial Park, is meant to be “flexible” and allow for a mix of uses or activities.
The Airport Industrial Center is currently a 66,000 sq. ft. multi-tenant office/warehouse [flex] building.
There currently exists a vacant office space on the west end of the building, while the remainder is a
mix of warehouse and a fairly new (and CUP approved) animal training facility.
There are no abutting residential zones or uses to the property; so no screening or additional landscaping
is required. The building is a concrete block with tip-up panels, and staff assumes all tenant separated
spaces are adequately constructed or will provide adequate noise attenuation, if needed.
The Applicant will be making interior tenant improvements to the site, and staff (including the Building
Official and Fire Marshal) will ensure that adequate ventilation, air circulation, and restroom facilities
will be in place before a certificate of occupancy is granted.
Per Section 12-1D-16: Off-Street Parking, the following uses and required parking spaces are noted:
USE PARKING SPACE(S) REQUIRED
Golf course, country club, tennis club,
public swimming pool
20 spaces, plus 1 space for each 300 square feet in excess of
1,000 square feet of floor space in the principal structure
Skating rink, dance hall, public auction
house, golf driving range, miniature golf,
trampoline center and similar uses
At least 15 spaces, plus 1 additional space for each 300 square
feet of floor area over 2,000 square feet
Office building and professional office
having 6,000 square feet or more of floor
area, bank, savings institution
At least 1 space for each 200 square feet of net usable floor
area
Warehouse, storage handling of bulk
goods
At least 1 space for each 2,000 square feet of floor area
The racquet club facility was noted as having 21,250 sf. of floor space, with a mix of varying athletic
activities, that may fall under the two upper boxed categories of the Parking Regulation standards,
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 229 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 4 of 7
namely “tennis club” and “golf driving range” (?) and “similar uses”. By applying both to the proposed
use, staff calculated the following:
x Tennis Club w/ 21,250-sf. area: 20 sp. + [21,250-1,000 = 20,250 / 300 = 68 sp.] = 88 spaces
x Golf / Similar Uses w/ 21,250 sf.: 15 sp. + [21,250 – 2,000 = 19,250 / 300 = 64 sp.] = 79 spaces
x Warehouse Uses (BDS / Am-Vets / FTLD): 23,700 sf. (total) / 2,000 = 11.85, or 12 spaces
x Office Use w/ 8,000-sf.(net): 8,000 / 200 = 40 spaces
Based on these calculations, the total number or spaces needed to support this racquet club use and the
existing or future uses on this site amount to 131 to 140 spaces needed.
The applicant was tasked with providing an accurate count of the site’s parking spaces, and where
additional parking(spaces) could be provide to support all uses on this site. The subject property
currently contains 106 marked or dedicated parking spaces. The Parking Plan – Ex. 1 illustrates the
site can accommodate 44 additional spaces, or 150 total spaces. There also appears a potential for
adding more spaces (if needed) along the front yard/Mendota Heights Road frontage. The 24 parking
spaces striped along the back loading dock area was initially a concern with city staff, but the owner
claims the two existing warehouse uses do not use or require all five loading dock spaces, and any
vehicles parked in this area should not interfere with any heavy truck traffic or deliveries.
Upon conferring with the city’s own Recreation Manager, and due to her extensive knowledge of tennis,
pickleball and related court activities, it was her professional opinion this club would only allow (at
most) 28 players on the indoor courts; and possibly up to same in the social area, and 10-15 members
in the fitness area and up to 1-2 in the golf simulator. This would equate to at most 73+/- members,
with similar number of parking based on 1 space/member (assuming each drive/park separately).
It is staff’s opinion that the 64 spaces situated along the back and side yard area next to the offices will
suffice for that space’s parking needs, plus allow for additional club members to park as well in this
area. The club’s remaining parking can be accommodated on other parts of the site, and should not
pose any off-street parking issues or congestion on nearby streets.
While most athletic or fitness clubs may typically see or experience a morning, noon or late afternoon
(after work/business hours) levels of participants, the Applicant has stated this facility will be a private
club membership only, which should help limit the level of service by allowing members to reserve
court times at their own leisure or schedules, so any potential impacts to traffic or parking should be
limited or minimal on the site or to the area.
There are no plans to add any access points in to the site, nor will any on-street parking be allowed.
Staff believes the use will not have any negative impacts or effect upon the health, safety, and welfare
of occupants (of the multi-tenant building) or surrounding land uses; nor will the use be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of the community. Moreover, the use may actually provide a nice
facility for bettering the health and welfare of the community and allow year-round indoor athletic or
fitness activities for the city’s residents. The private club use will likely provide members and
participants the ability to stagger their use hours and not cause any congestion or negatively impact the
parking needs for this recreation use and the other tenant uses.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 230 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 5 of 7
B. The proposed use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the city code and comprehensive
plan.
Applicant’s Response: d) To our knowledge the creation of racquet courts within our facility at 1415
Mendota Heights Road does not violate any provisions within the City Code and instead will enhance
the general we/I-being of the community by bringing recreational and wellness opportunities to
residents of Mendota Heights.
Staff Response: The subject parcel is guided I-Industrial in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan
provides the following goal statement:
Goal 3: Encourage and support industrial and commercial development in designated areas.
Policies
1. The city will use available resources to identify redevelopment needs. This will include cooperation with
Dakota County and the Metropolitan Council to achieve redevelopment objectives.
2. Transitions between adjoining land uses will be required for adjacent residential uses, and will be
encouraged between compatible land uses (e.g. transition between a general manufacturing and retail use
will be encouraged).
3. Amenities within the industrial and commercial districts will be encouraged to promote a more vibrant
and attractive place for workers.
City Code Title 12-1L-6 Conditional Use states:
“The development and execution of this chapter is based upon the division of the city into districts
within which the regulations are specified. It is recognized, however, that there are special or
conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any
district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land
or the public need for the particular location. To provide for these needs, the council may by resolution
approve a conditional use for those uses and purposes, and may impose conditions and safeguards in
such permits to ensure that the purpose and intent of this chapter is carried out.”
The club is planning to install one of the three padel courts outside the building in the front yard area.
As noted, City Code Section 12-1G-2 allows for “commercial recreation” uses as a CUP in the I-
Industrial District, but under said district the use “…must be conducted within a completely enclosed
building.” Furthermore, City Code Section 12-1D-6: Fences: provides language addressing fences for
tennis courts. Since this padel court will likely require the enclosure (note: for the purpose of this
report, the padel court is being treated as or considered similar to a tennis court) and “…any fence used
for the enclosure of tennis courts shall not exceed ten feet (10') in height, and shall not be located within
the required front yard.” Due to the padel court located outside the building and in the front yard area,
and the likelihood of a fence or enclosure needed for this court, this padel court will not meet City Code
and will not be allowed.
Even without this outdoor court, Staff believes the proposed “indoor recreational use” can be
considered in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City Code and comprehensive plan;
and that there is no reason to believe that the proposed use will be contrary to the standard of review
for conditional use permits listed above; and should be compatible with the spirit and intent of the
Industrial Zoning District.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 231 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 6 of 7
ALTERNATIVES for ACTION
Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions:
1. Recommend APPROVAL of the Conditional Use Permit, with certain conditions and based on the
findings- of- fact that the proposed racquet club use will be compliant with the standards and regulations
of the City Code; or
2. Recommend DENIAL of the Conditional Use Permit request, based on the findings of fact(s)
determined by the Planning Commission, that the Conditional Use Permit requested herein does not
meet certain regulations or standards under City Code; or
3. TABLE the request, pending additional information as requested by the Planning Commission and
direct city staff to make certain revisions before final consideration is given on this planning item; with
direction to extend the application review period an additional 60 days, in compliance with Minnesota
State Statute.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Twin City Racquet and
Squash Club facility and commercial recreational use in the I-Industrial District, based on the attached
findings-of-fact that and with the following conditions of approval:
1. All racquet or athletic activities shall be conducted entirely within the enclosed building. The
outdoor padel court shown on the submitted site plan is not approved and will not be allowed under
this CUP approval.
2. The 24 parking spaces located on the back side of the building and the 16 spaces located on the
east edge of the existing parking area, as illustrated on the site plan must all be striped.
3. Outdoor storage and display of materials is prohibited.
4. A sign permit shall be required prior to installation of any additional tenant signage on the subject
parcel/building. No banner or temporary signs will be allowed.
5. A building permit shall be required prior to any applicable demolition or tenant space
improvements.
6. No on-street parking or blocking of loading areas is allowed.
MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW
1. Aerial/Location Site Map
2. Letter of Intent
3. Site Plan / Athletic Club Layout
4. Ex. -1 Parking Plan Layout
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 232 of 238
Planning Report – 2022-22 (TC Racquet-Squash Club) Page 7 of 7
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL
Planning Case No. 2022-22
Conditional Use Permit for Twin City Racquet & Squash Club
Drop Shot, LLC (Applicant)
1415 Mendota Heights Road
The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed indoor commercial
recreation use and conditional use permit request:
1. The proposed conditional use allowing the new commercial recreational use (Twin City Racquet
and Squash Club) in the Industrial District will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of the community, nor cause any serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor depreciate
surrounding property values.
2. The new recreational use conforms to the general purpose and intent of the zoning code and
comprehensive plan, including I-Industrial District performance standards.
3. The proposed recreational use on the subject property should not impact or negatively affect the
required parking needs of the Applicant’s business needs or the other leased tenant or future tenant
needs on the site.
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 233 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 234 of 238
City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 235 of 238
SUBJECTPROPERTYCity Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 236 of 238
Office: 8,000-sf Racquet & SquashClub: 21,250-sf.BDS / Am-Vets:14,000-sf.For Love of Dogs:9,700-sf.City Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 237 of 238
EX.-1Proposed TCRacquet-SquashClubCity Council | Tuesday, November 1, 2022 | Page 238 of 238
End