2021-11-10 Planning Commission Special Mtg. MinutesNovember 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 of 8
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
The special meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Wednesday,
November 10, 2021 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M.
The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Commissioners Patrick Corbett,
Sally Lorberbaum, Cindy Johnson, Michael Toth, Brian Petschel, and Andrew Katz. Those absent:
None
Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as submitted.
Hearings
A) PLANNING CASE 2021-18
ERIK AND SARAH IVERSON, 2452 POND CIRCLE EAST – WETLANDS
PERMIT
Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that the Iverson’s are seeking approval
of a Wetlands Permit to allow the installation of a new flagstone fire pit and patio, a walkout entry
patio, retaining walls, steps, grading and landscaping work, along with some tree pruning and
removal on their property located at 2452 Pond Circle East. This application has been deemed an
“after-the-fact” due to work had already been commenced by the homeowners.
A public hearing notice for this planning item was held at the October 24, 2021 regular meeting,
where this item was tabled to the next meeting. Hearing notices were published and re-mailed to
all properties within 350-ft. of the site; no comments or objections to this request were received.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti provided a planning staff report and a presentation
on this planning item to the Commission (which is available for viewing through the City’s
website). Staff recommended approval of this application based on the findings and with
conditions.
Commissioner Corbett asked if there is an ordinance limiting the height of a retaining wall.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that there is not such guidance outside of
the critical area.
Commissioner Lorberbaum referenced the pollinator friendly policy which is noted in the staff
report and stated that she had difficulty finding the policy.
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 8
Community Development Director Tim Benetti stated that this policy was adopted in 2016, prior
to his arrival. He was unsure if it is available on the website. He stated that any new development
is encouraged to use pollinator friendly and/or native plantings.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that it would be nice if that information is made available on
the website.
Commissioner Petschel noted that while it is recommended, it is not required by policy.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti confirmed that it is encouraged but not required.
Commissioner Petschel stated that perhaps condition five should be adjusted.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti noted that is the typical language used for that
condition, but the language could be modified.
Commissioner Petschel commented that the Commission cannot give the City power it does not
have.
Commissioner Katz referenced the silt sock and asked if those are permanent or just through
construction.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that it is used during construction and until
the yard is established to prevent silt runoff.
Commissioner Katz asked if berms are ever encouraged as a natural barrier for this type of
property.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti replied that the City does not prefer berms as that
can prevent the proper flow of water. He stated that the applicants have agreed not to disturb the
buffer area.
Commissioner Johnson stated that a double row silt fence is mentioned in the conditions, while
the applicant’s narrative suggests use of silt sock.
Community Development Director Tim Benetti stated that he spoke with other City staff, and they
believe the socks work better than the fencing. He stated that the language in the condition could
be modified to state, redundant silt protection measures.
Chair Field opened the public hearing.
Sarah Iverson, applicant, thanked the Commission for holding a special meeting to reconsider this
application. She also thanked staff for their assistance throughout this process. She commented
that the grading information has been provided. She stated that they also added three more trees
to the proposed landscaping plan, although that is not required. She stated that the lot continues
to be heavily wooded, and they are attempting to find balance between greenspace and the wooded
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 of 8
area. She stated that the two rock spills will come out of the base of the north retaining wall and
provided additional details. She stated that they only cleared out two dead trees from the buffer
area and are committed to leaving that area be as it is.
Commissioner Johnson thanked the applicants for removing the buckthorn and being good
stewards. She stated that while she feels that the applicants will continue be good stewards, she
still has questions on the plan. She asked the distance from the rock wall to the pond edge, that
she did not notice on the plan.
Tim Johnson, contractor representing the applicant, stated that distance is about 50 feet.
Commissioner Johnson asked what else would happen below the rock wall in terms of ground
cover or plantings.
Mr. Johnson replied that area would stay as is as they are not working in that area. He stated that
other than the dead tree removal, they have not done work in that area. He noted that most of that
area is mulch or eroded soils. He explained how the wall would be constructed.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the applicant would be willing to plant a native mix from the
buffer to the wall area.
Mrs. Iverson stated that after the buckthorn removal they noticed additional plant growth. She
stated that it would be difficult to access that area for maintenance after the wall is completed.
Commissioner Johnson stated that area looked bare when she visited the site. She asked for details
on the types of plant growth.
Mr. Johnson commented that this is the fall season and noted that he provided photos from the
summer when the area was lusher. He stated that the applicants desire a minimum landscape and
do not want to add additional things that would need to be maintained in an area they are not
disturbing.
Commissioner Johnson stated that if some type of ground cover is not added, that will return to
invasive species.
Mrs. Iverson commented that buckthorn removal is a process and would feel fruitless planting
something that may be overrun with buckthorn.
Commissioner Johnson asked for details on the rock spill.
Mr. Johnson stated that the property currently has downspout collections made from landscaping
tile. He noted that one spout is pointed towards a neighboring property and that would be
redirected to the proper path. He stated that the rock spills would help to slow the rate of runoff.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the rate of flow would be slowed enough to hit the rock spill and
then slowly move to the other areas.
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 of 8
Mr. Johnson confirmed that is the intention. He noted that currently flows from the retaining wall
towards the neighboring property, with nothing to slow it down. He stated that they need to protect
the natural area of the pond, but also need to protect the retaining wall and integrity of the wall, as
well as protect the neighboring home.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the light grey area on the plan is trap rock.
Mr. Johnson confirmed that decorative rock would be used in those areas. He stated that they are
replacing that material that already exists and are attempting to protect the trees they are attempting
to save.
Commissioner Johnson asked if shrubs and other things will be planted.
Mrs. Johnson confirmed they are intending to place additional plantings on the property.
Commissioner Johnson asked if any other ground cover or trees are planned in the area shown in
white.
Mr. Iverson commented that area is already heavily treed.
Mr. Johnson noted that area is not being worked on.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the contractor is familiar with the prevention measures for
invasive jumping worm.
Mr. Johnson stated that he is not.
Commissioner Johnson provided additional details on that process.
Commissioner Corbett thanked the applicant for coming back with an updated plan. He referenced
the comment of Commissioner Johnson that the plan misses the water line and asked the applicable
requirement of the City that would apply to that.
Commissioner Johnson stated that the wetlands permit requires a detailed plan.
Commissioner Petschel stated that the Commission has typically accepted Google Earth images
provided in the packet to satisfy the 500 feet.
Commissioner Corbett stated that he was simply wondering where the ordinance requirement was
for that element.
Commissioner Johnson stated that because it is a wetlands permit, she would want to know what
is being done to the wetland, in items F and H.
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 of 8
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that she welcomes the residents to Mendota Heights and
recognizes that they were not aware of the regulations when they purchased the property. She
stated that sharing the requirements in the newsletter would help advise residents of the
requirements. She stated that there was mention that the landscape plan is not complete, but the
Commission would need the plan to be complete in order to make a recommendation. She noted
that if this is the completed plan, additional items could be added in the future. She asked if the
landscape plan is complete.
Mr. Iverson replied that the plan is complete, and this item was added to the agenda because staff
deemed the application complete.
Commissioner Corbett stated that he would assume the applicants met with staff following the
previous meeting and asked what was given as guidance for the updates to the application.
Mrs. Iverson stated that she re-watched the meeting to use the questions and concerns as items that
needed to be addressed. She stated that staff also provided assistance.
Commissioner Corbett stated that he is simply attempting to find out where the gap is, which is
why the Commission is holding a second meeting for an application.
Jim Neuharth, 2450 Pond Circle East, commented that he was unable to attend the previous
meeting. He stated that he was one of the first to move into the development and paid a premium
in order to have the wooded lot near the pond. He provided background information on the work
he has completed on his property, with the proper permitting, along with his work with wetlands
during his retirement. He stated that he is concerned that the demolition work began before the
applicable permit was received. He was also concerned with shade trees that were removed
between the properties and with potential damage that could occur to trees near the property line.
He stated that perhaps he should have been more proactive with the applicants about making them
aware of the proper permitting that was necessary. He stated that he would also like to see a
notification process that addresses new residents near wetlands along with existing residents to
spread education about the protected areas.
Joe Slater, 2464 Pond Circle East, stated that he and his wife love living in the City and hope the
same for the Iverson’s. He stated that his complaint is with the City and the process that was not
followed. He believed that this process is much better than what occurred at the last meeting. He
hoped that the Iverson’s can make the desired improvements, following the parameters of the
City’s ordinances and regulations.
Commissioner Lorberbaum asked the contractor to address the concern mentioned with the oak
trees.
Mr. Johnson stated that they brought in an arborist before the project started and have treated those
trees to help them recover from the construction stress. He stated that when utilized
preconstruction, the success rate is great. He stated that they would minimize any construction
street over the top of the roots to the extent possible. He noted that if the wall is not replaced, that
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 6 of 8
will fall and cause additional damage. He provided additional details on the construction process
that would be followed.
Commissioner Toth asked the distance of the equipment to the oak trees mentioned.
Mr. Johnson provided additional details on how the equipment would work to replace the wall.
Seeing no one further coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close
the public hearing.
COMMISSIONER KATZ MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL, MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LORBERBAUM, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A WETLANDS PERMIT FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2452 POND CIRCLE EAST, WHICH WOULD ALLOW
CERTAIN BACKYARD IMPROVEMENTS AND TREE/VEGETATION REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF
FACT AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. ANY NEW REMOVALS, EXCAVATING, GRADING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE NEW BACKYARD IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING
THE FIREPIT PATIO, RETAINING WALLS, STAIRS, AND PATHS, SHALL BE IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE
DOCUMENT.
2. FULL EROSION/SEDIMENT MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF WORK AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE
DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. A DOUBLE ROW OF SILT
FENCE WITH SUITABLE FABRIC MATERIAL OR OTHER EROSION MEASURES
APPROVED BY THE CITY’S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUST BE IN PLACE
PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION OR
REMOVALS. EROSION BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE OUTER
EDGES OF THE SIDE YARDS, AND THE LOWER EDGE NEAR THE POND
BUFFER.
3. THE APPLICANT/OWNER SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY TREES OR VEGETATION,
NOR PERFORM ANY UNNECESSARY GRADING OR DISTURBANCE TO THE 25
FOOT WETLAND BUFFER AREA.
4. IF ANY ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION WORK, OR AREAS INSIDE OR BEYOND
THIS BUFFER EDGE (FROM THE NEW BACK WALL TO THE POND EDGE) NEED
TO BE DISTURBED, EXCEPT FOR THE PLANTINGS OF NEW
TREES/VEGETATION, THE OWNER MUST CONTACT CITY STAFF PRIOR TO
COMMENCING ANY WORK, AND REPAIR AND REPLANT ANY DISTURBED
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 7 of 8
AREAS WITH SUITABLE PLANTINGS AND MATERIALS PER DIRECTION OF
THE CITY’S NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICIAN.
5. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ANY NEW TREE OR LANDSCAPING MATERIAL
USED UNDER THIS APPROVED PLAN MUST MEET THE CITY’S LIST OF
NATIVE PLANTINGS AND POLLINATOR FRIENDLY TREES AND VEGETATION.
6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN AND AROUND THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE
RESTORED AND HAVE AN ESTABLISHED, PROTECTED AND PERMANENT
GROUND COVER IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BACKYARD IMPROVEMENTS
HAVE BEEN INSTALLED.
7. ANY NEW SITE CONSTRUCTION OR REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR ONLY
BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS; AND 9:00 A.M.
TO 5:00 P.M. WEEKENDS.
FURTHER DISCUSSION: COMMISSIONER JOHNSON STATED THAT SHE HAS
CONCERN WITH THE ALREADY DISTURBED AREAS AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE
DISTURBED AREAS BELOW THE ROCK WALL REPLACED WITH NATIVE
PLANTINGS. SHE NOTED THAT ERODED SOIL WILL GO INTO THE POND.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL COMMENTED THAT THERE IS SOME LEVEL OF
VEGETATION AND THE BUFFER EXISTS. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD BE FINE
WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION BUT WOULD NOT MAKE THAT A REQUIREMENT.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON SUGGESTED A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE
APPLICANT WITH THE NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICIAN TO REVIEW THE OPEN
GROUND AREAS AND HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT REVEGETATING THOSE AREAS.
COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL AGREED THAT HE LIKES THAT AS A
RECOMMENDATION. HE STATED THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THE INTENT, THAT IF
THAT AREA IS LEFT BLANK, SOMETHING WILL EVENTUALLY GROW THERE AND
MOST LIKELY WOULD BE BUCKTHORN. HE STATED THAT IT IS NOT A
REQUIREMENT THOUGH.
CHAIR FIELD CONFIRMED THAT THE MOTION MAKER AND SECONDER ACCEPT
THAT ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT REFERENCED THE USE OF DISTURBED LAND AND
STATED THAT IT WAS HIS UNDERSTANDING THAT AREA WAS NOT TOUCHED BY
THE APPLICANTS.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON AGREED SHE INITIALLY USED THAT TERM BUT
REPLACED THAT LANGUAGE WITH BARE GROUND.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TIM BENETTI PROVIDED SUGGESTED
LANGUAGE THE COMMISSION COULD USE.
November 10, 2021 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting Page 8 of 8
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON COMMENTED THAT SHE WANTED TO INCLUDE THE
OPEN SOIL AREAS IN ADDITION TO THE DISTURBED AREAS. SHE STATED THAT
SHE WOULD ALSO WANT REFERENCE TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICIAN
BECAUSE OF HER PLANT EXPERTISE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TIM BENETTI AGAIN REVIEWED THE
LANGUAGE PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION. IT WAS
CONFIRMED THAT IT WOULD NOT BE AN OBLIGATION.
COMMISSIONER CORBETT STATED THAT HE SUPPORTS SOME DIRECTION BUT
NOTED THAT THE APPLICANTS CANNOT BE FORCED TO DO ACTION ON AN AREA
THEY HAVE NOT DISTURBED.
COMMISSIONER LORBERBAUM REFERENCED THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT
AND ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION.
CHAIR FIELD STATED THAT THOSE ARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND TRUE
STATEMENTS. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE FINDINGS OF FACT SUPPORT THE
MOTION.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its November 16, 2021
meeting.
B) DISCUSSION OF CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEETINGS/EVENTS
CALENDAR YEAR 2022
Community Development Director Tim Benetti reviewed the 2022 meetings and event calendar.
Staff and the Commission discussed any dates that may vary from the typical schedule.
Staff Announcements / Updates
Community Development Director Tim Benetti gave the following verbal review:
• A ruling was made by the First Judicial Court related to the Culligan case and reported that
the City did not prevail. The City is meeting with the representatives from the League of
Minnesota Cities to determine the proper next steps.
Adjournment
COMMISSIONER CORBETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TOTH, TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:05 P.M.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0