Loading...
2021-07-20 Council MinutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Pursuant to one call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, CALL TO ORDER Mayor Levine called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Councilors Duggan, Paper, Mazzitello, and Miller were also present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. MOMENT OF SILENCE — IN MEMORY OF SCOTT PATRICK (EOW DULY 30, 2014) Mayor Levine asked for a moment of silence in memory of Officer Scott Patrick, end of watch July 30, 2014, Councilor Paper commented that there will be an event honoring Officer Patrick on July 30th at the intersection of Smith/Dodd at 12 noon. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Levine presented the agenda for adoption. Councilor Mazzitello moved adoption of the agenda. Councilor Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Levine presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilor Mazzitello moved approval of the consent calendar as presented, pulling item h. for a separate vote. a. Approval of July 6, 2021 City Council Minutes b. Approve the May 11, 2021 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes c. Approve Resolution 2021-61 Accept Donation to Marie Park Playground Grand Opening d. Acknowledge May 2021 Par 3 Financial Report e. Approve Ordinance No. 570 Amending 2021 Fee Schedule f. Approve Resolution 2021-62 Accept Park Bench Donation — Rogers Lake Park, Ivy Hills Park g. Approve Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Holy Family Maronite Catholic Church for September 11, 2021 h. Approve Cooperative Agreement with Great River Gr eerring for Valley P i. Approve Resolution 2021-63 Fire Hall Final Payments j. Approve the June 2021 Building Activity Report k. Approval of Claims List Councilor Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS H.) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH GREAT RIVER GREENING FOR VALLEY PARK Councilor Miller asked if additional context could be provided on the third stipulation related to revegetation of native species. He asked the contents of the seeding. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek commented that he did not have the answer at this time but could provide that to the Council once determined. Councilor Miller commented that it has been stated that the broadcast seeding should be a diverse woodland mix. Mayor Levine commented that this is a great example of how the City works in partnership with other organizations, noting that Great River Greening has been a wonderful partner. She stated that Great River Greening is contributing $57,000 and the City is contributing $9,000 for this project. Councilor Miller moved to approve the COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH GREAT RIVER GREENING FOR VALLEY PARK. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS No one from the public wished to be heard. PUBLIC HEARING A) RESOLUTION 2021-59 SWEENEY ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek explained that the Council was being asked to hold a public hearing on an easement vacation in Sweeney Addition commenced by petition. Councilor Paper commented that there is a catch basin next to the pedway near lot four and asked who owns that basin and who is responsible for maintenance. Mr. Ruzek commented that was privately installed by Mr. Sweeney and is privately maintained. July 20, 2021 �llendota Heights City CaunciL Page 2 of12 Councilor Paper asked where the water is coming from. Mr. Ruzek commented that the catch basin handles drainage from a small portion of the County road. Councilor Mazzitello moved to open the public hearing. Councilor Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0. There being no one coming forward to speak, Councilor Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilor Mazzitello moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2021-59 APPROVING AN EASEMENT VACATION WITHIN SWEENEY ADDITION. Councilor Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 B) RESOLUTION 2021-58 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION FOR EUGENIA AVENUE Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek explained that the Council was being asked to hold a public hearing on a right-of-way vacation commended by petition for Eugenia Avenue, Councilor Duggan asked if there would be enough land for 591 and 606 to allow lot splits if this is approved. Mr. Ruzek stated that 591 would not have enough square footage but 606 would exceed 30,000 square feet and could be split into two lots. Councilor Duggan asked the likelihood of MnDOT accepting a pathway across Sibley Memorial Highway from this potential vacated property. Mr. Ruzek stated that the City does not have a trail improvement plan in this area. He confirmed that Saint Paul has not reached out in desire of extending a trail. Councilor Mazzitello referenced the grade change in the right-of-way, specifically from the old alley between 591 and 606 and asked if an ADA compliant trail could be constructed with the grade changes. Mr. Ruzek stated that with grading a trail would be possible, perhaps with retaining walls. Councilor Miller asked the benefit that the City would earn from giving the easement away. Mr. Ruzek commented that he is not aware of the City investing resources into this area. He commented that the area has been maintained by the property owners. Mayor Levine stated that many well thought out written comments were received and she expressed appreciation for them. She stated that some residents referred to this as green space and asked if this fits that definition. Mr. Ruzek commented that he would consider this undeveloped right-of-way, noting that it was platted with the intention of being a roadway and not as green space. He stated that one of the July 20, 2021 Mendota Heights Ciry Council Page 3 of 12 conditions for vacation of this area would be that the right-of-way would be covered under a drainage and utility easement which would restrict certain activities. Mayor Levine asked if there would be enough room for another home if 606 were split into two lots. Mr. Ruzek provided additional explanation on where a building pad could be located on the property. Councilor Paper asked if it would be reasonable to have a trail come out at an uncontrolled intersection of a highway. Mr. Ruzek confirmed that the City does not favor a trail unless there is a destination for it. He did not believe staff would recommend construction of a trail that goes nowhere. Councilor Paper commented that currently 606 is not large enough to be split but this vacated right-of- way would make the lot large enough to split. He asked if a condition could be added stating that the lot could not be split. Mr. Ruzek commented that the City would not have legal means to restrict that. Mayor Levine asked if the Council could vacate only a portion of the right -of --way. Mr. Ruzek stated that the Council could vacate the right-of-way on 591, but there would still be an undeveloped portion of right- of-way remaining. Councilor Duggan asked if MnDOT would provide a driveway curb cut if a new lot were split off from 606. Mr. Ruzek commented that MnDOT would have to approve a curb cut for a new lot. He stated that currently the property owner has stated that they do not have a desire to split the lot. Mayor Levine invited the applicant to address the Council. Brian Burnett, 591 Hiawatha Avenue, stated that he requests that the City vacate Eugenia right -of --way. He stated that the other side of the right-of-way has already been vacated. He stated that he has regularly maintained the right-of-way since 1994. He stated that he would plan to install a fence and improve the area. He noted that the fence would eliminate nuisance during late hours of the night and dumping of trash. He reviewed incidents that have occurred over the years beginning with a burglary of his home in 1996 along with other attempted break ins and police reports related to nuisance activity within the right- of-way area. He asked if the right-of-way is still needed and requested that it be vacated. Natalie Fiscus, 606 Sibley Memorial Highway, spoke in support of the vacation of the right -of --way. She stated that she became the primary homeowner in 2013 after her parents passed away and has done her best to clean up trash in the right-of-way area which has been a constant problem. She stated that the right-of-way is used as a dumping ground. She hoped that if the area is no longer needed for public purposes, that it could become private property. She stated that she does not have the desire to split the lot or build another home and would not desire to hinder the ability for the City to maintain an easement. She stated that she would hope to put something up to deter people from coming onto her property. It would allow her and her siblings to feel safer in their home. Councilor Mazzitello moved to open the public hearing. Councilor Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 July 20, 2027 Mendota Heights Ciry Council Page 4 of12 Ed Meisinger, 572 Hiawatha Avenue, stated that during the 16 years he has lived at the home, the Burnetts have been excellent neighbors and he fully supports the request. He stated that if the property could be vacated it would be a definite improvement for the neighborhood and the city. Maureen Dunagan, 597 Suttcliffe Circle, commented that she has never seen negative activity in the right-of-way. She commented that her home was also burglarized but that had nothing to do with the right-of-way. She stated that the residents on her circle use that right-of-way as a walkway to their home. She stated that she has offered to maintain the lot between her home and the Bumett's. Bill Dunagan, 597 Suttcliffe Circle, stated that he is opposed to this vacation of right of way. He stated that the people to the north would win as they would gain additional property, but the people south of the right-of-way have also maintained this area. He stated that people in their area access the neighborhood by walking through this right-of-way. He stated that he was burglarized in 2010 but that had nothing to do with this area. He stated that he served on the Saint Paul Park and Rec Board and their policy was that land should not be given up unless it can be replaced with something else. He stated that this action would give benefit to two property owners but would take away from the enjoyment of the other four property owners in that area. He believed that vacating the right-of-way would be taking away value to the properties on the south side. He stated that vacating this does not benefit the City. Therese Radford, 613 Suttcliffe Circle, stated that they purchased their home in November and did the research to determine the right-of-way was public property. She stated that is a buffer to Highway 13 and is the only access they have to safely walk in the area. There being no one further coming forward to speak, Councilor Mazzitello moved to close the public hearing. Councilor Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Burnett stated that no one has ever offered to help him maintain this area. He stated that his police report states that this area was used for the burglary of his home. Hes e picious activity in the right-of-way in the evenings. Ms. Fiscus, 606 Hiawatha, stated that she has not seen anyone else maintaining the area. She stated that when she walks her dogs, they walk on the highway to access the park and do not use the right -of --way. Councilor Mazzitello asked if the City issued a license agreement for a neighbor to plant and irrigate within the right-of-way. Mr. Ruzek stated that he was not aware of such. He noted that many times people have irrigation within right-of-way. Councilor Mazzitello asked if a license agreement would be needed in this case because there is no curb line or street in that area. Mr. Ruzek commented that he tends to assume that if someone installs something in a public right-of-way if it is damaged it would not be replaced or repaired. ,7uTy 20, 2021 Mendota Heights City Cortnci[ Page 5 of 12 Councilor Mazzitello referenced a recent vacation where a neighbor was allowed to plant within an easement. Mr. Ruzek commented that in 2009, half of the right-of-way was vacated. He stated that a new homeowner wanted to plant trees and the City issued a license agreement to plant the trees with a second easement being provided to ensure access. Councilor Duggan commented that this is a vacation request for 30 feet of right-of-way. Mr. Ruzek commented that the other side of the right of way was never platted. Councilor Duggan asked for the last time the City denied a right-of-way vacation request. Mr. Ruzek noted that in 2009 the vacation of this right-of-way was denied. Councilor Miller commented that he is sympathetic to all residents that experienced crime in their lives. He stated that he is not convinced that if the land is vacated by the city, that would solve that issue. He stated that while there is no immediate need, there could be a need in the future. He stated that retaining the right-of-way would allow for the possibility of a trail in the future. Councilor Paper commented that he walked the right-of-way, and it seems odd that when you get to the portion that is dense and overgrown, it is a skinny trail. He stated that if it was getting more use, as it has been stated, there should be more disturbance. He could not recall the last time the Council did not approve a vacation request. Councilor Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2021-58 APPROVING ARIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION COMMENCED BY PETITION. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Further discussion: Councilor Mazzitello commented that there is a distinction between aright -of --way and easement. He stated that a right-of-way is owned by the governmental agency while an easement is owned by the private property owner with access rights granted to the governmental agency. He stated that in his 13 years with the City, he is only aware of one denied vacation request which was this request in 2009. He stated that in 1924, the first 30 feet was platted and 60 to 70 years later the second 30 feet of the intended roadway did not get platted. He stated at that time Eugenia Avenue was not going to be constructed. He stated that he could not find an ironclad definition of green space but read the definition provided by the dictionary and other entities. He did not believe this right-of-way constitutes a green space, noting that it was not intended to be such and has not been maintained as such. He stated that he would guess there are hundreds of these around the city and previously worked to develop criteria that would be used to evaluate whether right-of-way is needed. He stated that this right-of-way does not provide benefit to the City but acknowledged that it could potentially provide an option in the future. He noted that he spoke with MnDOT and there are no plans to construct a trail along Highway 13. He stated that there is litter, vandalism, potential contribution to property damage and theft and therefore believes that this right-of-way causes a liability to the City. He stated that the only issue he is concerned with is that 606 would become a splitable lot but noted that he would be okay moving forward. Mayor Levine commented that she is unsure of the future purpose of the right -of --way but does not want to pretend that there may not be a connector to the brickyards in the future. She felt that the right -of --way is an access point for properties to avoid using Sibley Memorial Highway. She stated that her other concern would be potential for lot split. She stated that while the current property owner is not interested July 20, 2021 Mendota Heights Ctty Council Page 6 of 12 in a lot split, a future owner could. She stated that people purchased homes with the thought that the right- of-way would remain. She stated that she would be okay vacating a portion of that leaving a little trail along. She suggested vacating half of the property. Mayor Levine moved to amend the motion to vacate the right-of-way behind 591 and leave the right-of- way in place behind 606. Councilor Duggan accepted the amendment. Councilor Mazzitello stated that the resolution makes no mention of a drainage and utility easement and suggested it be included in the now be it resolved statement. He asked for opinion from legal counsel. City Attorney Elliot Knetsch stated that it would be preferred to have that included. Councilor Mazzitello commented that if the right-of-way for 606 is vacated, there would be a 30-foot easement that would remain in place. He stated that the lot would remain splitable, but it would be up to a builder as to whether it would be buildable. He stated that he does not accept the amendment to the motion. Councilor Mazzitello moved to amend the motion to include a fourth condition that prior to the vacation being enacted a drainage and utility easement shall be enacted to cover the entirety of the right-of-way area. Councilor Duggan asked if a path were desired from Hiwatha to Sibley would it need to be larger than 30 feet. It was confirmed that a path would not need to be wider than the 30 feet available. He asked if additional space would be needed for a roadway and where that space would come from. Councilor Mazzitello confirmed that additional space would be needed for a roadway. He noted that traditionally a trail is about eight feet. Mayor Levine commented that while there is a possibility for a trail in the future, only eight feet would be needed. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek noted that while trails are eight feet in width, additional space is needed for construction and typically a 20-foot easement is desired. He stated that if the Council chooses to vacate a portion of the right-of-way, a section could remain along the southern edge and the remainder could be vacated. Councilor Mazzitello commented that his motion to amend stands as stated. He explained that would provide the property to the owners at 591 and 606 but it could not be built upon. Councilor Duggan noted that he would support that action. Mayor Levine commented that the other homes purchased with the wooded area behind them, and it would be unfair for those property owners to have the uncertainty of a splitable lot that someone could build on. She stated that currently there is a motion to vacate the right-of-way behind 591 and not 606. July 2Q 2027 Mendota Heights City Council Page 7 of 12 Councilor Mazzitello commented that the motioner accepted the amendment made by Mayor Levine, but the seconder did not. He then made an amendment to the motion to place an easement across the entire right-of-way. He stated that the property at 606 would gain the 30 feet of right-of-way but it would be in an easement and could not be built upon. Councilor Paper as if there is away the Council could find out the amount of frontage for that lot. Councilor Mazzitello commented that the lot is currently three feet short of the frontage required for lot split. Councilor Duggan asked if there is suggestion from legal counsel as to whether restrictions could be placed upon building on the lot. City Attorney Knetsch commented that if the minimum lot size and frontage are available, the lot would be considered buildable. Councilor Duggan asked if it would be possible to only vacate the right of way along 591, or whether a separate notice would be needed for that type of action. City Attorney Knetsch commented that the hearing was for the entire right-of-way and therefore state law would allow for vacation on any part of the right-of-way. Councilor Duggan asked if there would be legal liability on the City for denying the request for 606. City Attorney Knetsch commented that the right-of-way has been in place for almost 100 years and therefore there would be no risk to the City for that right-of-way to remain. Councilor Duggan asked if there would be support to only vacate the right -of --way for 591 and not 606 Councilors Duggan and Mazzitello withdrew the motions on the table. Councilor Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2021-58 APPROVING ARIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION COMMENCED BY PETITION FOR THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF 591 WITH A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE APPLIED OVER THE VACATED RIGHT-OF- WAY. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Councilor Duggan asked if Mr. Burnett is comfortable with this action. Mr. Burnett confirmed that he would be comfortable with the drainage and utility easement. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 (Miller) NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS A) DISCUSSION OF USE OF LIGHTS AT MARIE PARK Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence explained that the Council was being asked to consider a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the use of the existing rink lights at Marie Park for nighttime pickleball and basketball play. July 2Q 2021 Mendota Heights City Couixcil page g oj12 Councilor Duggan asked where the pleasure rink is located. Ms. Lawrence commented that they flood a basketball court for a pleasure rink, which does not have nets or goals for hockey. Comments from the public: Tony Ruiz, 1775 South Victoria Road, commented on the use of Marie Park, noting that he supports pickleball courts and kids using the parks. He stated that he is concerned about the noise that would be generated. Councilor Duggan moved to DIRECT STAFF TO IMPLEMENT THE PILOT PROGRAM FOR 2021 FROM MID-SEPTEMBER TO OCTOBER 311T AT MARIE PARK FOR NIGHTTIME BASKETBALL AND PICKLEBALL PLAY UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Mayor Levine seconded the motion. Councilor Miller commented that he has spoken with residents that live adjacent to the pickleball courts and their primary concern is the noise. He stated that he liked the idea of the lights but after speaking with residents he will not support this action. Councilor Duggan commented that the pilot program would only use the lights until 8 p.m. Councilor Paper commented that pickleball seems to be successful and the courts are full. He commented that it is terrific but that is a lot of pressure on the park. He stated in the winter people are generally not sitting outside. He stated that he did not want to see additional pressure on the park and neighborhood and would prefer to have play limited by daylight hours. Councilor Mazzitello stated that one of the smallest parks in the community has been chosen for the pickleball epicenter. He noted that this would draw pickleball players to this neighborhood park which then creates more of a community park- setting. He stated that he is concerned that this would conflict with the desire to mitigate against light pollution and the impact on pollinators and wildlife. He stated that he would not support a pilot program. Mayor Levine commented that this park has lights on for hockey until 10 p.m. and it is not a quiet park, nor has it ever been a quiet park. She commented that people are at this park from the time its open until it closes and did not think the noise from pickleball is any more disturbing than the noise from any other park activity. She stated that the Park and Recreation Commission is tasked with doing this type of work and is recommending approval. She noted that this would be a pilot program that could be revoked at any time and therefore believed this would be a good method to try it out. She stated that neighborhood parks are not intended to exclusively be for those neighbors and were intended to attract people outside of the neighborhood. She stated that many people play in the evenings and therefore the lights would create more opportunity. She asked that the pilot be allowed to move forward and if there is a problem, they can shut the lights off. Councilor Duggan commented that a park is a park and people do not view it differently whether it is a neighborhood or community park. July 20, 2021 Mendota Heights City Comicil Page 9 of 12 Councilor Miller commented that he is not against pickleball but is merely suggesting that everything should be allowed in moderation. He commented that while keeping the lights on longer would allow for additional opportunity to play, it would also impact the adjacent neighbors. Mayor Levine stated that she hasalso spoken with members of the community, noting that there are strong advocates on both sides of the issue. She asked for input on the number of letters received. Ms. Lawrence commented that two households were in favor and four households were against. She noted that she has received many calls from residents asking when the lights would be turned on. Mayor Levine commented that she received many more comments in support from residents than against. She stated that the Student Representative to the Commission also made comments about the basketball court and that it would be nice to have that lit. She stated that she has spoken with all the neighbors that live directly across from the basketball court and pickleball courts and she is not aware of a neighbor in that area that does not want the lights on. Councilor Paper asked how it would be determined that there is a problem if the pilot program moves forward. Ms. Lawrence commented that she would work with staff to determine how the pilot program would be run. Councilor Duggan commented that this seems similar to when there was discussion related to the skate park. He stated that the City will be aware if there are issues from the comments they receive. Mayor Levine noted that the lights during September and October would provide the ability for people to play a quick game after they get home from work. Councilor Mazzitello commented that he has been contacted by residents and is not basing his position on the six letters received. He stated that he attempts to make the decision based on the information within the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that he is not totally opposed to having lights on pickleball courts but does not believe a neighborhood park is the proper location. Councilor Duggan stated that perhaps the issue of community park versus neighborhood park should be considered for Marie Park as the park has grown with more recreation opportunities. He stated that he does not see a problem trying out the program. Councilor Paper asked when this would come back if this were done as a pilot program. Ms. Lavnence stated that she would bring it back soon after the pilot program is completed so that it is fresh in everyone's mind. Mayor Levine commented that she believes if the Council wants to do lights, it should go forward with a trial period. This would give the Council the data to know whether lights would work. She stated that lighting could also be tried at Friendly Hills once those courts are completed. Councilor Duggan commented that if this moves forward there should be signage stating that the lighting is a temporary trial period. July 20, 2021 Mendoza Heights City Coa�neil Page 10 of 12 Councilor Paper asked when this would be proposed to start. Ms. Lawrence stated the trial period would begin in mid -September and run through October 31s`. Councilor Paper asked how success would be defined. Ms. Lawrence commented that she would define success as people enjoying recreational opportunities without complaints. She stated that if she receives complaints, she would work with the City Administrator to identify next steps. Councilor Paper commented that this would essentially have lights on for one to two hours past sunset for a period of six weeks. He asked if the lights could be shut off if it is raining. Ms. Lawrence replied that the City would not have that capability. Ayes: 3 (Duggan, Levine, Paper) Nays: 2 (Miller, Mazzitello) B) CONSIDER ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 568 MISSISSIPPI RIVER REVISED CRITICAL AREA PLAN Councilor Duggan asked if this could be postponed to the next meeting Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that the draft has had a public hearing at the Planning Commission and therefore the draft could be submitted to the DNR. He stated that if the Council is accepting, staff could send it to the DNR and it could come back to the Council at a later date. City Administrator Mark McNeill commented that this item could be carried over to the next meeting. Councilor Miller asked if deferring the action would have real time impact on pending litigation. Mr. Benetti replied that it would not. He stated that the City is still under the moratorium, although there are properties interested in development. Councilor Mazzitello asked when this would come back to the Council. Community Development Director Tim Benetti commented that depending on the timeline of the DNR this could come back at the second meeting in August or one of the September meetings. Councilor Mazzitello moved to table ORDINANCE NO. 568 AMENDING TITLE 12 — ZONING WITH THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR CRITICAL AREA (MRCCA) OVERLAY DISTRICT ORDINANCE. Councilor Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS City Administrator Mark McNeill announced that the City received word from Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) that it will begin implementing a voluntary odd/even lawn watering and outdoor uses and that outdoor watering be limited to the hours outside of noon to 6 p.m. He noted that this is the first July 20, 202] Mendota Heights City Caunetl Page 11 of L2 time since 1988 that SPRWS has had to implement such a program. He urged residents to go to the SPRWS website for more information. He also advised of the upcoming summer concerts and noted that other activities and announcements which can be found on the City website. He noted that Night to Unite parties should be registered with the Police Department. He stated that the event will be held on August Yd, and therefore the Council meeting will be moved to Wednesday, August 4`� . COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilor Mazzitello complimented the other members of the Council, noting that there was good debate, which was done professionally. Councilor Paper reminded the group about the July 30s' event at Smith/Dodd to remember Officer Scott Patrick, Councilor Duggan commented that Neighbors Inc is celebrating its 50t1i anniversary next year and he will be helping to plan the event. Mayor Levine stated that Night to Unite. is an opportunity to create community and get to know your neighbors. She encouraged everyone to participate. ADJOURN Councilor Duggan moved to adjourn. Councilor Mazzitello seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Levine adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. St6phanfir&Levine Mayor ATTEST: Lorri with City Clerk Judy 20, 2027 Mendota Heights City Cauneil Page.72 of72