2021-03-09 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 9, 2021- 6:30 P.M.
Virtual Meeting-WebEx
MN Stat. 13D.021 - Meeting by telephone or other electronic means: Conditions - MN stat. 13D.021 provides that a meeting of a public
body may be conducted via telephone or other electronic means if meeting in a public location is not practical or prudent because of a
health pandemic or declared emergency.
At its meeting on March 17, 2020, the Mendota Heights City Council declared a local emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a
part of this action, until further notice all Parks and Recreation committee meetings will be held by telephone or through other
electronic means, with social distancing measures in place. All public meetings will continue to follow the requirements of the
Minnesota Open Meeting Law.
With both the log-in or dial-in options, the line will be muted. Observers wishing to make comments on any of the agenda items will
need to contact the Recreation Program Coordinator (meredithl@mendota-heights.com) no later than noon on the day of the meeting,
and provide their contact information and the agenda item which they want to address. Note that any applicable long-distance
telephone charges may apply.
Public Attendance is available via telephone at: +1-312-535-8110
Access Code: 133 869 2779
AGENDA
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3.Pledge of Allegiance
4.Approval of Agenda
5.Approval of Minutes
a.February 9, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
6.Citizen Comment Period (for items not on the agenda)
*See guidelines below
7.Acknowledgement of Reports
a.Par 3 Update
b.Recreation Update
c.Park Improvement Update
d.Park Volunteer Program Update
e.City Council Priorities Update
f.Student Representative Update
8.New Business
9.Unfinished Business
a.Skate Park Work Group Update
b.Asset Management Plan Draft Review
10.Staff Announcements
11.Commission Comments and Park Updates
12.Adjourn
1
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is
received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on
short notice. Please contact City Administration at 651-452-1850.
Guidelines for Citizen Comment Period: The Citizen Comments section of the agenda provides an opportunity for the public to
address the commission on items which are not on the agenda. All are welcome to speak.
Comments should be directed to the Chair. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per person and topic; presentations which
are longer than five minutes will need to be scheduled with the Recreation Program Coordinator to appear on a future Parks
and Recreation commission agenda. Comments should not be repetitious.
Citizen comments may not be used to air personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for
political campaign purposes. Commissioners will not enter into a dialogue with citizens, nor will any decisions be made at that
presentation.
Questions from the Commission will be for clarification only. Citizen comments will not be used as a time for problem solving or
reacting to the comments made, but rather for hearing the citizen for information only. If appropriate, the Chair may assign
staff for follow up to the issues raised.
2
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION MEETING
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
The February meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on
Tuesday, February 9, 2021, via WebEx.
1. Call to Order – Chair Steve Goldade called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Roll Call – The following Commissioners were present: Chair Steve Goldade,
Commissioners: Jaffrey Blanks, Patrick Cotter, Bob Klepperich, Stephanie Meyer, Dan Sherer
and Amy Smith; absent: none. Staff present: Recreation Program Coordinator, Meredith
Lawrence, Assistant City Administrator, Cheryl Jacobson and Public Works Director, Ryan
Ruzek.
2.a Introduction of New Commissioner
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence introduced the newest member of the
Parks and Recreation Commission, Jaffrey Blanks.
The members of the Commission introduced themselves.
3. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence noted that each February the Commission
elects a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for the next 12-month period. She reviewed the
duties of each position and opened the floor for nominations for the Chairperson position.
Motion Klepperich/second Blanks to nominate and elect Steve Goldade as Chairperson of the
Parks and Recreation Commission for 2021.
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Chair Goldade aye
Motion carried.
Ms. Lawrence opened the floor for nominations for Vice Chairperson.
Motion Cotter/second Meyer to elect Bob Klepperich as Vice-Chairperson of the Parks and
Recreation Commission for 2021.
A roll call vote was performed:
3
Commissioner Sherer aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commissioner Klepperich abstain
Chair Goldade aye
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Cotter aye
Motion carried.
4.Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
5.Approval of Agenda
Motion Klepperich/second Sherer, to approve the agenda.
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Chair Goldade aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Motion carried.
6.a Approval of Minutes from January 5, 2021 Regular Meeting
Motion Klepperich/second Cotter to approve the minutes of the January 5, 2021 Parks and
Recreation Commission Regular Meeting.
Further discussion: Commissioner Meyer asked if these items could be accepted by consensus
in order to avoid roll call votes.
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence noted that State Statute requires a roll call
vote for hybrid and virtual meeting formats.
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commission Sherer aye
Commissioner Smith aye
Chair Goldade aye
Commissioner Cotter aye
Motion carried.
7.Citizen Comment Period (for items not on the agenda)
4
None.
8.Acknowledgement of Reports
Chair Goldade read the titles of the two updates (Par 3 and Recreation Updates) and polled the
Commissioners for questions.
8.a Par 3 Update
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence briefly reviewed the update noting that
staff is preparing for the 2021 season. She stated that the course had a very good season
noting that the numbers included in the Financial Report are pending approval through the audit
and provided a brief summary. She stated that staff is happy with the numbers and continues to
discuss ideas for the 2021 season. She stated that the rebranding ideas were approved by the
Council at its last meeting and the new logo has begun to be used. She advised of the policies
she is working to update and noted that the seasonal staff positions for the course have been
released for recruitment.
Commissioner Smith asked if there would be golf camps this summer.
Ms. Lawrence replied that staff is planning to have camps, leagues, and tournaments. She
stated that they are keeping registration capacities low and COVID-19 plans will be necessary,
noting that registration begins on March 9th.
Commissioner Sherer stated that he has seen promotions from other courses offering early
passes and asked if the City has considered that option.
Ms. Lawrence replied that she does not have staff at the course at this time but is something
staff could look into for 2022. She stated that staffing duties are at capacity for 2021 as she still
needs to direct time towards COVID-19. She stated that she would be interested in discussing
options for 2022.
Commissioner Cotter asked if a page will be added to the City website specifically for the Par 3
course.
Ms. Lawrence stated that is on the list for the Communications Coordinator to complete. She
stated that there are some constraints to the website and therefore the Council is discussing
options for that in the near future. She confirmed that the page will be updated.
Chair Goldade asked if the Council selected the logo recommended by the Commission.
Ms. Lawrence confirmed that the navy logo recommended by the Commission was approved by
the Council.
8.b Recreation Update
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence reported that warming houses are now
open at Friendly Hills and Marie Parks. She stated that ice rinks have been well-used this
season. She stated that recreation registration opens on March 9th at 9:00 a.m. on the website
or in-person at City Hall. She noted that all programs will have COVID-19 plans as required and
will be updated based on guidance from the Governor. She stated that, as directed by the
Commission, she met with the regular user groups for field and facility use to answer any
questions those groups may have, advise them of deadlines and process, and receive
feedback.
5
Chair Goldade thanked staff for meeting with the user groups as requested. He hoped that
helped to get the groups off to a positive start.
Commissioner Sherer asked if it would be possible to receive an update on the requests
received and the schedule for granting permits.
Ms. Lawrence replied that requests were due February 1st, but she has not yet had a chance to
review those. She stated that the typical users have all submitted requests. She noted that she
will meet with maintenance staff the following week to determine capacity and hopes to have the
allocations completed by the end of the month or early in March.
Motion Cotter/second Blanks to acknowledge the staff reports.
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Chair Goldade aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Motion carried.
9.New Business
9.a Rules of Order
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence stated that she provides the rules of order
each February as required in the bylaws and provided a brief overview.
Chair Goldade asked for information on attendance and how members should report an
absence.
Ms. Lawrence noted that a Commission member is allowed to have up to four excused
absences within one year. She stated that if a Commission member is not able to attend, they
should alert both herself and Chair Goldade by 4 p.m. the day before the meeting.
Commissioner Cotter commented that perhaps staff should review Section 1.3 to determine if
additional language should be added related to virtual meetings because of the current
situation.
Chair Goldade stated that he and Commissioner Klepperich have begun meeting with Ms.
Lawrence one week prior to the meeting date in order to set the agenda in attempt to make the
process efficient and more productive. He welcomed any input from Commissioners prior to
that time if they have an item they would like to appear on an agenda.
9.b Assign Commissioner Parks
6
Chair Goldade stated that historically each Commission member has been assigned two parks
with the task to visit the parks between meetings and express any comments or concerns. He
asked that members of the Commission choose their parks for the year.
Commissioner Blanks chose Valley Park and Mendakota Park.
Commissioner Sherer offered to swap park choices with Commissioner Smith as they live near
each other.
Commissioner Smith agreed and her assigned parks are now Friendly Hills and Kensington
parks.
Commissioner Sherer agreed to Hagstrom King and Market Square parks.
Commissioner Cotter agreed to take the Dog park and Rogers Lake park.
Commissioner Klepperich agreed to take Civic Center and Ivy Hills parks. He reminded the
Commissioners to report any safety issues to Ms. Lawrence immediately to ensure that can be
addressed by Public Works.
Commissioner Meyer agreed to keep Marie and Victoria Highlands parks.
Chair Goldade agree to take Valley View Heights and Wentworth parks.
9.c Marie Park Playground Recommendation
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence stated that information was included in the
packet related to the Marie Park playground remodel. She stated that the subcommittee worked
with her heavily on this task. She stated that the RFP was approved by the City Council in
October and reviewed the items which were approved be included in the RFP. She stated that
the budget was $125,000 and each of the nine proposals met that budget. She stated that the
subcommittee reviewed the proposals and narrowed down the proposals to three, which were
then made available for public input and review tonight as options A (Finnegan), B (Midwest
Playscapes), and C (Northwest Recreation). She stated that each proposal has a similar cost
and is at the allowed budget. She stated that a virtual open house was hosted on January 26th
with five residents participating and preferences for options B or C. She stated that an in person
open house was also hosted on January 28th with the majority of those residents choosing
options C and A. She stated that a survey was also posted on the community’s engagement
platform, as well as other platforms, noting that those results were included in the packet with
option C gaining the most support. She stated that option C has a very large container, which
almost doubles the size of the current playground, and does not fit within the topography of the
map included in the RFP. She stated that staff met with the contractor and felt comfortable that
they could keep the same equipment in a different arrangement to better fit the space and
address any safety concerns. She stated that updated layout was included in the packet and
still encroaches further into the baseball field than planned. She asked the Commission to
consider that as there is not a fence for the outfield. She asked the Commission for a
recommendation as this will move forward to the Council next week in order to meet the
timelines within the RFP and installation.
Chair Goldade provided clarification on the business representing each brand of play equipment
as outlined in each option.
7
Commissioner Cotter stated that he reviewed the applicable contracts and compared those to
the RFP, noting that he has concerns with the contract language.
Commissioner Klepperich asked for information on warranties and installation.
Ms. Lawrence replied that necessary documents for each company’s warranty were included in
the RFP as required, which appear to be standard.
Commissioner Sherer stated that he reviewed the options with his children, who selected option
C as did the majority of the community that provided input. He asked for input from staff related
to the encroachment of the outfield, noting there could be a conflict depending upon the user.
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek replied that there is a marker post of 180 feet in right field
from home plate, and in left field the marker is 200 feet. He stated that staff would not want to
encroach further than that marker.
Commissioner Blanks asked how viable option C would be, noting that the footprint, features,
and cost caught his eye. He asked if that additional cost could be supported.
Ms. Lawrence clarified that option C had a bid alternate and stated that without the shade
structures the total would be $125,000 and with the shade structures the cost would be
$133,004. She provided background information noting that the City submitted the RFP before
it found out about the change in how special parks fund dollars could be used. She stated that
depending upon the size, some special parks fund dollar could be used but the majority would
need to be funded in another manner, and therefore the budget would be tight at $125,000.
Commissioner Cotter commented that in reviewing the RFP it states the contractor shall pay
sales tax and each vendor has stated that is not their responsibility and that the taxes would be
billed separately. He stated that sales tax would be a significant cost that increases the cost
above the budgeted amount. He stated that there are other issues as to who would be
responsible for different items in the process that would also need to be addressed.
Ms. Lawrence stated that the City is a tax-exempt entity and does not pay sales tax on items
purchased, with the exception of the golf course. She stated that she could look into that further
to gather additional information before this moves to the Council.
Chair Goldade asked if site prep would be funded through the $125,000 or whether there are
other options for that.
Ms. Lawrence noted that the site prep, demolition, and disposal were included in the RFP and
the only expense the City will pay for outside of the RFP was the tree and stump removal.
Commissioner Klepperich stated that option C includes a note that it has been assumed that the
site will be prepared, which would then seem to place that burden on the City.
Commissioner Cotter stated that the contract does include demolition and site work, but the
remaining language is not consistent with that and provided examples. He stated that language
would need to be addressed.
Chair Goldade confirmed that those issues could be worked out with staff prior to the City
Council meeting.
8
Commissioner Meyer commented that there are a few things she is concerned with. She stated
that when these were presented to the public, she was unsure that it was clear the giant tree will
be removed, as that is a source of shade, and the public would most likely want to see some
option for shade included. She stated that when presented to the public, the layout for option C
was different, noting that there were concerns with the layout. She stated that the
rearrangement that has been done is great, but it now encroaches on the outfield which would
appear to make that not a valid option. She stated that residents have asked about getting
around the pond and that was not discussed in relation to the footprint. She stated that they are
putting effort into keeping the walkway and slab, but on the other side there would be further
encroachment towards the pond that would further disturb the wildlife in that area. She noted
that option B is fairly close to the pond and was unsure how important it is to keep the walkway
and cement slab and whether there would be an option to shift to the southeast. She stated that
if the layout for option C, with the encroachment, is not viable it should simply be removed from
the table for consideration.
Mr. Ruzek commented that a buffer around a pond is not necessarily for wildlife and nesting but
is meant to help filter runoff. He stated that the City does not fertilize the park and therefore the
surface water runoff would not contain a high amount of nutrients. He stated that he has not
selected a planned trail layout between the trail and park and therefore the buffer could be
increased to the playground container and/or a fence could be added to further buffer the areas.
He did not believe the entire asphalt path needs to remain in place, but he would prefer more
than one ingress into the park. He believed that trail could be shorted by 20 or 30 feet. He
stated that the concrete pad is only one or two years old and did not believe that would need to
move. He stated that the playground could shift only slightly without impacting additional trees
or encountering additional challenges with topography.
Chair Goldade asked if the Commission could recommend option C with a smaller container.
He asked the type of flexibility the Commission would have.
Ms. Lawrence stated that staff feels comfortable with the way the RFP was written and that the
features could be moved around as residents provided input on features and not necessarily
where the features are located. She stated that the City received a good response from bidders
because some municipalities have chosen not to move forward with CIP projects. She stated
that she would like a recommendation from the Commission tonight in order to move forward
with the timeline for installation this year.
Commissioner Smith commented that when the subcommittee chose the three vendors, these
were chosen because of the equipment that was included noting that each had a unique piece
of equipment with a good distribution of equipment for both older and younger children. She
stated that it is unfortunate that option C encroaches into the field as fields are in high demand.
She stated that options A and B have similar features and provide a lot as well. She recognized
that shade was a concern but noted that trees will grow and eventually provide additional shade.
Commissioner Klepperich commented that option B specifically says that no site restoration and
extra material left on the site will be the responsibility of the City to remove, which also conflicts
with the RFP.
Commissioner Cotter agreed that there are inconsistencies in each of the contract and noted
that there would need to be additional negotiation on the terms of whichever option is selected.
He asked for input from Commissioner Smith and Meyer as to whether the footprint issue can
9
be fixed without substantially changing what the playground will look like. He also asked if the
Commissioners would be comfortable moving forward without the shade option. He noted that
option C seems to jump out at everyone as the number one choice for amenities and therefore if
the footprint and shade could be addressed it would seem to solve the issues.
Commissioner Meyer agreed that if the footprint issue and shade could be solved, C would be
the clear winner as that was the preferred choice by the public. She stated that if there are no
other options for the footprint, she does not believe that option could move forward.
Commissioner Blanks commented that he feels that the shade aspect is also important in the
summer months. He stated that it is easy to appear as the number one choice when you do not
meet all the requirements such as size, shade, and cost.
Ms. Lawrence stated that C did follow the requirements as the RFP allowed for a bid alternate,
which is what that vendor did with the shade. She agreed that the shape would not follow
topography, but the shade was allowed to be an alternate.
Chair Goldade asked if there is a possible solution to the encroachment of the baseball field.
Mr. Ruzek stated that the container would be slightly outside of the baseball field, with the
biggest fear being that playground users would find the area unsafe for their children if a ball
comes near the playground area. He stated that perhaps there would be a way to configure the
container and alignment, removing the walkway and shifting to the west, to better utilize that
space. He noted that perhaps the size could even be increased slightly to the east to pull
further away from the baseball field. He stated that as long as the features are included,
reorganizing the layout would not violate the RFP.
Commissioner Cotter asked if the Commission could provisionally approve that option with the
direction for staff to attempt to configure the container size and contract language. He stated
that if that could not be done to acceptance, perhaps the item come back before the
Commission.
Commissioner Klepperich stated that a recommendation needs to be done tonight in order to
meet the timing and completion for this upcoming season. He stated that the Commission could
make a recommendation of C as the preferred choice, contingent upon those items being
completed and provided a backup suggestion if those contingencies could not be met. He
stated that he would not want the playground and baseball activities to overlap.
Commissioner Sherer stated that there was a discussion on whether to use Marie or Friendly
Hills for 9- or 10-year-olds. He asked if the traveling team puts up their own fence for use.
Ms. Lawrence stated that a playground has a typical life of 15 years and therefore field use
within that time could change and it would not just be used by 9- and 10-year-olds. She stated
that she does plan to clarify the contract language for whichever choice is made, along with
assistance from the City Attorney. She confirmed that the RFP has a deadline of which the City
must take action on in order for that to remain valid. She stated that this is scheduled to go to
the City Council next week. She agreed that a fallback option would be helpful in the case that
the contingencies could not be worked out for option C.
Chair Goldade provided background on the temporary fencing, noting that it was not installed at
Marie in 2020. He stated that there could be a motion that states that the playground does not
10
impact the baseball field. He stated that two motions could be made identifying options one and
two.
Motion Cotter to recommend to the City Council playground C for Marie Park, if the footprint is
able to be reconfigured to not encroach on the baseball field as is and in a manner that does not
cause a safety concern for playground or baseball field users.
Further discussion: Commissioner Blanks asked if the shade option would also be addressed.
Ms. Lawrence asked for clarification on whether the bid alternate in the amount of $8,004 is
meant to be included in the recommendation or whether the recommendation was to move
forward with the bid price of $125,000.
Chair Goldade asked if Commissioner Cotter would consider including the bid alternate for the
shade.
Commissioner Cotter confirmed that he would accept that with the motion as follows.
Motion Cotter/second Blanks to recommend to the City Council playground C for Marie Park, if
the footprint is able to be reconfigured to not encroach on the baseball field as is and in a
manner that does not cause a safety concern for playground or baseball field users, and to
include the bid alternate option for shade with a total price of $133,004.
Further discussion: Commissioner Sherer stated that it would need to be decided as to what
would encroach on the baseball field.
Ms. Lawrence stated that staff measured the foul ball post near the playground, which was
measured at 180 feet, while the post on the other side of the field was marked at 200 feet. She
stated therefore there was already slightly an encroachment on that side of the field because of
the existing container.
Chair Goldade stated that perhaps the language should state that the marker for right field not
be less than 180 feet.
Commissioner Meyer asked if all the plans go past the 180-foot marker. She asked if the
Commission is asking that this plan be reduced by 20 feet. She noted that all the plans
encroach into that area to some extent.
Ms. Lawrence provided additional explanation on the containers proposed for the different
options, noting that option C would encroach.
Mr. Ruzek clarified that he would not want to see the container closer than the 200-foot mark.
He stated that closest point for the existing container is 199 feet.
Chair Goldade suggested that the additional language be added that the container never be
less than 180 feet for the distance as measured for right field rather than using as is. He
confirmed agreement with the motion maker and seconder to amend the motion as stated:
Motion Cotter/second Blanks to recommend to the City Council playground C for Marie Park, if
the footprint is able to be reconfigured to not encroach on the baseball field as is with right field
measured at 180 feet, and in a manner that does not cause a safety concern for playground or
11
baseball field users, and to include the bid alternate option for shade with a total price of
$133,004.
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Chair Goldade nay
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Klepperich nay
Motion carried.
Chair Goldade asked if there is interest in putting forth a second recommendation in the case
that the contingencies for option C cannot be met.
Motion Smith/second Blanks to recommend to the City Council playground B for Marie Park as
the secondary recommendation.
Further discussion: Commissioner Blanks commented that he sees this as a great option as it
meets all the needs and includes the option for shade. He stated that the majority of discussion
focused on option C, but option B is a great option.
Commissioner Meyer asked if there would be an issue with the distance from the container to
the pond, as she received input from residents concerned about decreasing that distance. She
noted that the option for a trail around the pond would not be an option if the playground
encroaches too far in that direction.
Mr. Ruzek stated that the eastern border of the boundary would have been a minimum of 25
feet from the waterline and he would like a minimum of 25 feet for the buffer from the waterline.
Commissioner Meyer asked if the area that currently has cattails would be filled.
Mr. Ruzek replied that he will majorly destroy the pond before a buffer is installed. He stated
that he would most likely dig the pond out and then install a buffer around the edges in one or
two years. He confirmed that he would be comfortable with this plan as well.
Commissioner Klepperich asked and received confirmation that option B would take the same
footprint of the existing playground.
A roll call vote was performed:
Chair Goldade nay
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Smith aye
12
Motion carried.
Chair Goldade thanked staff and everyone that participated in this process.
9.d Dakota County Big Rivers Regional Trail Improvement
Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that Dakota County operates the Big Rivers Regional
Trailhead, located at the end of Mendota Heights Road to the west of Highway 13. He stated
that there are historical features within the park and the County is looking to make upgrades to
the park. He reviewed the proposed improvements that are anticipated, noting that the project
will tie into the City’s sewer and water utilities. He also provided details on the intention of the
State to turnback Old Sibley Highway to the City of Mendota Heights in the near future. He
provided details on the proposed structure which would include a restroom and picnic area. He
confirmed that this item is simply informational and does not require action from the
Commission as this is a County project. He stated that the City would be able to display
materials in one side of the new kiosk.
Chair Goldade thanked staff for teaming with the County, noting that this is a well visited park
and he looks forward to the additional trail connections.
10.Unfinished Business
10.a Park Volunteer Program Concept
Chair Goldade asked if Items A and D could be moved to the March meeting.
Recreation Program Coordinator Lawrence stated that she would like to gain input on this item
tonight but stated that if time is a constraint, she could push that item back. She provided
background information stating that there have been a lot of requests from residents, the
Commission, and other groups for a park volunteer program. She stated that other departments
within the City have shown interest in partnering on this type of program and therefore staff
would like input on the vision for this program to determine how the strengths of different
departments could be used to create a successful program for the City.
Chair Goldade welcomed input from the Commission tonight to allow staff to continue to move
forward. He asked if there are specific questions from staff or whether the intent is for general
feedback.
Ms. Lawrence stated that she used the plans of other cities in order to develop a model
program.
Assistant City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson commented that in putting this concept together
staff attempted to keep it broad in order to get the best of all worlds and not exclude different
groups that would want to sponsor an event for a park. She stated that in hearing input from the
Natural Resource Technician there are different volunteer opportunities from that department,
along with the Police Department. She stated that the attempt would be to create a unique
program for the City that is broad enough to allow for different opportunities. She asked if the
Commission agrees with keeping this broad to allow for more opportunities or whether it would
like to be more focused on an adopt a park type program.
13
Commissioner Cotter stated that he likes the broad concept as it is more inviting. He stated that
the point is to engage people in the parks. He stated that it could even be broadened to be a
parks and trails program.
Chair Goldade agreed that he likes the broad concept noting that it could become more specific
as time goes on if desired. He stated that volunteer programs do require staff time and
therefore that should be acknowledged as well. He believed that the benefits would outweigh
that additional staff time that would be needed.
Commissioner Smith asked if the City does any events in conjunction with Earth Day, such as a
clean-up event as that could be used to introduce the program and increase awareness.
Ms. Jacobson stated that the Natural Resources Technician has spearheaded Earth Day events
in the past and she could follow-up with her to discuss that opportunity.
Commissioner Klepperich asked if there is a volunteer coordinator staff position.
Ms. Jacobson stated that there is a staff person that designates a few hours per week towards
that duty, noting that employee has previous experience as a volunteer coordinator.
Ms. Lawrence welcomed any additional input Commissioners may have in the next few days
prior to the staff meeting.
Chair Goldade asked that the City be purposeful in how Commissioners could be involved in the
program.
10.b Student Representative Update
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence stated that an update was included in the
packet. She stated that three applications were received, and staff is working with the Council
to review the applications and bring a Student Representative on board. She stated that they
are looking at the possibility to have three representatives rather than one.
10.c Skate Park Work Group Update
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence stated that a memorandum was provided
in the packet as an update.
Commissioner Klepperich stated that that subcommittee is made up of five individuals that have
interest in the park along with he and Commissioner Smith. He reviewed the report he provided
in January and noted that the renderings, as directed, were presented to the subcommittee at its
last meeting with the intention of the next step to be presenting those renderings at a
presentation to the Commission, then Council with hopefully construction to occur this year. He
noted that some subcommittee members have changed direction and want to use a different
vendor and exceed the allotted budget, therefore the group has come to a stalemate. He hoped
that additional discussion and consensus could be gained at the group’s February meeting.
Commissioner Smith commented that there were two other vendors added to the contract and a
few of the subcommittee members wanted to ensure that the group looks at all options. She
hoped that a presentation could still be made to the Commission in the near future.
14
Ms. Lawrence confirmed that she would have final renderings available for the subcommittee to
review at its February meeting with the intention to present to the Commission at its March
meeting.
Chair Goldade thanked all members of the subcommittee and Ms. Lawrence for their continued
work on this matter.
10.d Funding of Projects - CIP
Chair Goldade asked if this item could begin the March meeting agenda.
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence stated that she shared the information that
she had as a baseline in preparation for the next budget year. She stated that this item will
appear on the March agenda.
11.Staff Announcements
Recreation Program Coordinator Meredith Lawrence shared the following announcements:
•Commissioner training is scheduled for February 24th at 7:00 p.m. in conjunction with the
City Council
•Programming registration opens on March 9th at 9:00 a.m.
•Golf and tennis positions have been posted of the City website
•Other events can be found on the city’s website
12.Commission Comments and Park Updates
Commissioner Meyer
•Marie Park continues to be popular and she looks forward to the new playground
improvements
Commissioner Smith
•Friendly Hills continues to be well used during the winter months
•Market Square has not had much use with the cold weather
Commissioner Cotter
•No report
Commissioner Sherer
•It has been fun to see outdoor winter activities, such as hockey and ice skating
Commissioner Klepperich
•Marie Park has seen use from ice skaters
Commissioner Blanks
•He looks forward to being a contributing member of the team
Chair Goldade
•Congratulated the City for the wonderful news story on winter pickleball at Marie Park
•Kids are skating at Wentworth and he continues to be impressed with the beauty of that
park
•Valley Park continues to be well used during the winter months
15
13. Adjourn
Motion Klepperich/Second Sherer to adjourn the meeting at 8:28 PM
A roll call vote was performed:
Commissioner Smith aye
Commissioner Blanks aye
Commissioner Cotter aye
Commissioner Sherer aye
Commissioner Meyer aye
Commissioner Klepperich aye
Chair Goldade aye
Motion carried.
Minutes drafted by:
Amanda Staple
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
16
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Par 3 Update
2020 Annual Report
Staff is working on finalizing the Mendota Heights Park and Recreation/Par 3 Annual Report. Staff
anticipates to present this to the commission at the April Parks and Recreation Commission
Meeting.
Preparation for 2021 Season
Staff is preparing to open the course and start the 2021 season by conducting staff interviews,
ordering necessary materials and small equipment, preparing the irrigation scheduling system
and rewiring the irrigation boxes, updating the staff’s maintenance schedule, finalizing COVID-19
protocols and procedures for the clubhouse, and updating the course’s COVID-19 plan. Once the
weather turns, staff will be ready to open the course.
Well Rehabilitation Project
Staff received approval from the City Council at their March 2 meeting to replace the well’s pump,
motor and component parts. The cost of the project is $17,135.25 which was included in the
FY2021 budget.
Registration Opens for Programming
The City opened registration for recreation and Par 3 programs at 9:00am on March 9. Staff can
provide an update at the meeting on the current state of registrations.
17
7a.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Recreation Update
Summer Recreation Programs Registration
Registration for Summer recreation programs will open on Tuesday, March 9 at 9:00am on the
city’s website and in person at City Hall. Information regarding offerings was mailed to residents
via a postcard and more information is available on our website and in person. All programs will
have a COVID-19 plan that will be provided to participants prior to the first day of the program.
Adult Softball
Registration for Summer adult softball is open. Returning teams had priority, but after the March
1 deadline, the City opened registration to new teams. The City offers both men’s and women’s
softball leagues at the “D” level. Staff can provide an update on how many openings still remain.
Field and Facility Permits Issued
Field and Facility permit requests for use between March and July were due on February 1 for
first priority. Staff received over 6,200 hours of requested field space. Permits were reviewed by
Recreation and Public Works staff and were issued to user groups.
Canoe Rack Rentals at Rogers Lake
Staff opened up the application process for canoe rack rental spaces in February. The deadline
for resident first priority was March 1. Nine of the twelve canoe rack spaces were accounted for
by the March 1 deadline. Canoe rack rental spots will now be taken on a first-come, first-serve
basis for residents until the process is opened to non-residents on April 1 if any spots remain.
18 7b.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Park Improvement Update
Marie Park Playground Renovation
At its meeting on February 16, the City Council approved a playground redesign for Marie Park.
The design selected is from Northland Recreation (Little Tikes) and features a play structure for
ages two-to-five years, a play structure for ages five-to-twelve years, two sand diggers, a two-
person grasshopper spring rider, a revolution spinner, track ride, five swings, climbers, slides,
and two benches. The design was a community favorite in feedback received through the City's
Polco poll, and virtual and in-person open houses.
The City Council approved the cost for the playground structure, installation, and shade
structures for a total of $133,004. The proposed playground replacement is approximately
double the size of the existing playground at Marie Park, and it is anticipated to be complete by
June 1 of this year, weather permitting.
19
7c.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Park Volunteer Program Update
Staff took the concept feedback provided by the Park and Recreation commission from the
February meeting and is continuing to refine the program concept. When more information is
available staff will bring back this topic to the Parks and Recreation for review prior to bringing it
to the City Council.
20
7d.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Cheryl Jacobson, Assistant City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Council Priorities
Background
During February, the City Council met to establish priorities and strategies to pursue over the
next two years. Attached is the summary document.
As noted, there are a number of parks related strategies and example action items included in
the plan ranging from very specific park improvements (e.g. dugouts at Mendakota Park) to larger
planning discussions (e.g. the development of the Bourne Lane Property). Many strategies and
resulting action items are interrelated and outcomes will depend on funding and how the City
Council will want to proceed.
Staff will be working to accomplish identified action item examples in support of fulfilling the
council’s strategies. Progress updates will be provided to the City Council on a quarterly basis,
but work will occur continuously throughout the next two years.
Requested Action
Informational Only.
21
7e.
Priority: Enhance City Governance and Services
Strategy Action Item (Examples) Action Priority
2021 2022 Parked
Enhance connections with community
partners, businesses and residents
•Offer and/or support community social events and programming such as summer and winter
festivals, additional concerts, 4TH of July Fireworks, fall bonfire, etc.
•Continue to inform residents about COVID-19 and the city’s response to the “new normal” post
pandemic
•Encourage and partner on programs to support local businesses (e.g. Takeout Tuesdays)
•Create a City Ambassador Program
•Work with Minnesota Grown to determine feasibility of locating a farmers market in Mendota
Heights or alternatively establish a location with available plots for community gardening
Cultivate civic engagement and
participation •Establish a resident Civics Academy
Attract, retain and develop a qualified
workforce
•Assess the morale of employees by conducting an employee survey
•Conduct a “table top” exercise practicing emergency management operations and test the
functionality of the Mendota Heights Emergency Operations Center (Fire Station training room)
Promote recognition of Mendota
Heights through area brand
development
•Work with the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce and area businesses to study
costs/benefits of implementing a city hotel lodging tax
Priority: Create a Vision for City Development and Redevelopment Areas
Strategy Action Item (Examples) Action Priority
2021 2022 Parked
Analyze options and decide
development of Bourne Lane property •Determine desired use of the property (i.e. park, regional sporting venue, tax base).
Create a clear and understandable
Zoning Code in order to meet
projected growth and market demands
•Conduct a comprehensive review and revise, as needed, Zoning Code Ordinances to reflect
changes made in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (e.g. MRCCA, Institutional Zoning, general text
revisions)
Support worker mobility and resident
technology use by addressing the lack
of cellular capacity in the city
•Investigate the feasibility and benefits of cellular network providers installing small cell network
coverage nodes within Mendota Heights
22 7e2.
Priority: Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure and Assets
Strategy Action Item (Examples) Action Priority
2021 2022 Parked
Address City Hall and Police
Department Building Safety and
Functionality Improvements
•Decide timing of recommended improvements from the City Hall/Police Department
building/space needs assessment
Revise long range infrastructure
management and improvement plan
•Update City Capital Improvement Plan to expand sections on equipment, facilities, parks and
Public Works (e.g. rolling 5-year plan)
Manage traffic congestion and improve
high use roadways
•Continue to participate in regional discussions and solutions for Dodd Road, Delaware Avenue and
the Viking Lakes development impacts
Priority: Encourage & Support Park Opportunities and Improvements
Strategy Action Item (Examples) Action Priority
2021 2022 Parked
Determine dedicated funding source(s)
to support Mendota Heights parks
•Research a proposal for resident consideration of a Parks Referendum
•Determine future use of Par 3 bond payment dollars and plan for 2023 availability
Upgrade existing park and recreation
facilities
•Replace Wentworth Warming House
•Decide and complete skatepark renovations
•Add dugouts to baseball/softball fields at Mendakota Park
•Add lights to Civic Center Park
•Add lights to baseball/softball fields at Mendakota Park
•Add markers and other signage to the city trail system
Reimagine Park/Public space to
maximize use
•Create use plan for vacant Friendly Hills Tot Lot (e.g. as community garden)
•Consider feasibility of Bourne Lane property as future park space/regional sporting venue
23
Priority: Conserve, Protect and Enhance Natural Resources
Strategy Action Item (Examples) Action Priority
2021 2022 Parked
Establish a Natural Resources Advisory
Commission
•Formally approve the creation and develop new commission bylaws and structure; advertise and
appoint commission members
Determine dedicated funding sources
to support Natural Resources policies
and activities
•Establish annual city budget for natural resources for FY22
•Determine future use of Par 3 bond payment dollars and plan for 2023 availability
Join Minnesota GreenStep City
Program
•Determine city process and take actions needed to complete organizing steps to becoming a
recognized GreenStep City
Develop seasonal maintenance
strategies and policies that support the
environment
•Continue to implement road salt reduction practices including maximized use of a brine system
for snow and ice control
Retain and reclaim natural sites
throughout the city
•Evaluate mowing standards within Park Maintenance and develop natural areas plan and
standards to further promote pollinator friendly habitat
Continue to assess City tree/shade
canopy and re-evaluate/revise
response strategies
•Reevaluate and update Emerald Ash Borer Tree Replacement and Treatment Policy
•Establish standards/specifications to continue to diversify tree species used in tree inventory
replacements
Protect Surface Water Quality •Implement priorities identified in the existing plan
24
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Student Representative Update
The student representative application period ended February 1 and there were three applicants.
Staff has been in contact with the three applicants and has scheduled interviews for Monday,
March 15. Chair Goldade and Vice Chair Klepperich will conduct the interviews with staff and will
make a recommendation for the filling of the position to the City Council on April 6. The student
representative selected will be invited to the April 13 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
25
7f.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks & Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Skate Park Work Group Update
The skate park work group has been meeting in order to address operational issues at the skate
park. Staff will provide an update to the commission as well as answer any questions the
commission may have.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Informational Only.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Informational Only.
26
9a.
DATE: March 9, 2021
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Meredith Lawrence, Recreation Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: Asset Management Plan Draft Review
BACKGROUND:
Staff has started working on a Park Asset Management Plan that lists the city’s current park
amenities and when replacements will need to be completed due to end of useful life and for
safety purposes. Currently, the plan includes items that have been discussed as possible park
capital improvements.
The goal is for the City’s Park Asset Management plan to be a tool that forecasts the city’s needs
over a five-year rolling period based on city-adopted long-range plans, goals, and policies. Staff
plans to update this document annually to ensure consistency and reflect trends, changing
demands, and financial resources.
In the next few weeks staff plans to conduct an in-depth park inventory to determine what other
ongoing maintenance projects should be included in this plan. Items that will likely be added
include projects such as irrigation maintenance, shingles on the picnic shelters, and backstop
replacements. Although some of these projects may be further out than five years, it will be
important information for staff to document in order to start planning for future funding and
forecasting.
City staff will work with the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council to execute the
organization of this plan. Staff will utilize the details from this plan in order to organize the Budget
Improvement Packages (BIPs) in June for the following year’s budget. Those Budget Improvement
Packages will be submitted to the City Council for preliminary review in August. The final budget
is adopted in December for the next year.
Attachment: Asset Management Plan Draft
ACTION REQUESTED:
The commission is asked to provide direction to staff on specific details they would like to see
included in the Asset Management Plan in order for the plan to provide sufficient information for
the Commission to make recommendations in the future.
27
9b.
2021-2025
PARK ASSET
MANAGEMENT PLAN
28
9b2.
OVERVIEW OF PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEM
The City of Mendota Heights enjoys an extensive park system. In 1989, a voter approved park referendum
was passed, which funded upgrading eight existing neighborhood parks, constructing five new parks, and
constructing 7.8 miles of trails. In addition to city parks, the City purchased the 17-acre Mendota Heights
Par 3 Golf Course by a separate referendum in 2007.
Park and trail facilities maintained by others located within or near the City boundaries are Fort Snelling
State Park, Harriet Island-Lilydale Regional Park, Dodge Nature Center, Big Rivers Regional Trail, and North
Urban Regional rail, renamed the River to River Greenway (Mendota-Kaposia Trail).
This Park Asset Management Plan is a planning tool that forecasts the city’s needs over a five-year rolling
period based on city-adopted long-range plans, goals, and policies. This plan includes detailed descriptions
of park improvement projects and maintenance projects the city anticipates to initiate during the five-year
period. The plan is updated annually to ensure consistency and reflect changing demands and financial
resources.
City staff will work with the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council to execute the organization
of this plan. Staff will utilize the details from this plan in order to organize the Budget Improvement
Packages (BIPs) in June for the following year’s budget. Those Budget Improvement Packages will be
submitted to the City Council for preliminary review in August. The final budget is adopted in December for
the next year.
The goal of this plan is to:
• Provide a balanced program for park improvements given anticipated funding revenues over a five-
year planning period
• Enable the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council the ability to
evaluate the needs of the entire city
• Anticipate needed park improvements in advance, rather than being overlooked until critically
needed
• Provide a plan for park improvements that can be used in preparing the budget for the coming year
29
SUMMARY OF CITY PARKS
PARK NAME: AREA (ACRES):
Civic Center (Mertensotto Field) 17.6
Dog Park 8.2
Friendly Hills 15.5
Friendly Marsh 34.5
Hagstrom King 9.6
Ivy Hills 9.1
Kensington 14.5
Marie 6.6
Market Square .24
Mendakota 19.7
Rogers Lake 8.7
Sibley 10.8
Tot Lot .9
Valley 93.5
Valley View Heights .6
Victoria Highlands 6.7
Wentworth 10.4
SUMMARY OF REGIONAL PARKS
PARK NAME: AREA (ACRES)
Dodge Nature Center 162.3
Fort Snelling State Park 800
Lilydale Harriet Island Cherokee Park 374
30
SUMMARY OF PARKS COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES
PARK NAME: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Civic Center (Mertensotto Field) $180,000 $180,000
Dog Park $0
Friendly Hills $25,000 $20,000 $45,000
Friendly Marsh $0
Hagstrom King $0
Ivy Hills $135,000 $135,000
Kensington $0
Marie $134,008 $134,008
Market Square $0
Mendakota $75,000 $790,000 $865,000
Rogers Lake $125,000 $20,000 $140,000 $285,000
Sibley $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $110,000
Tot Lot $0
Valley $130,000 $130,000
Valley View Heights $95,000 $95,000
Victoria Highlands $0
Wentworth $265,000 $85,000 $15,000 $185,000
Total: $646,008 $1,192,000 $187,000 $157,000 $162,000 $2,164,008
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $201,508 $970,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,171,508
Other Government Fund/Levy $382,000 $222,000 $187,000 $157,000 $162,000 $1,110,000
Grants ($180,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 ($180,000)
Other $62,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,500
Total: $466,008 $1,192,000 $187,000 $157,000 $162,000 $2,164,008
31
TOTAL COST: $180,000
PARK NAME: Civic Center (Mertensotto Field)
PARK SIZE ACRES: 17.6 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Baseball Field and Natural Area located at 1101 Victoria Curve
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth baseball field (250 feet) with pitching mount, irrigation, and turf infield
• 2 batting cages with electric (backstop safety netting)
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Lighting (2022)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Add Lighting $180,000 $180,000
Total: $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $180,000 $180,000
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $180,000
32
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Dog Park
PARK SIZE ACRES: 8.2 Acres
DESCRIPTION: The Off Leash Dog Park is located at 1360 Acacia Drive in the Industrial Park on an interim term basis.
The City has committed to this interim use through December 31, 2025 or until another date has been determined
by the City Council.
PARK AMENITIES:
• Fencing with double access gate (separate small and large dog areas)
• Waste bags are provided
• Sun shelter and wider gate was installed in 2019.
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Park Sign-Explaining Pilot Knob significance (no digging)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
33
TOTAL COST: $45,000
PARK NAME: Friendly Hills
PARK SIZE ACRES: 15.5 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Friendly Hills Park is located at 2360 Pueblo Lane
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth softball field (220/250/225 feet), not fenced
o Utilized as youth soccer field in the Fall
• Backstop replaced in 2020
• Hockey Rink (192’x80’) with asphalt surface, lighting, and warming house (replaced in 2017)
o Adjacent pleasure skating rink
• Two picnic shelters-no electric (additional picnic area next to tennis courts-future maintenance TBD)
• 2 tennis courts (asphalt surface replaced in 2009)
• Concrete basketball half court
• Paved walking trail, open space, pond
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Pickleball lines installed on hockey rink for multi-purpose use (2021)
• Tennis court resurfacing (2022)
• Playground equipment replacement (2026)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Pickleball Lines Addition $25,000 $25,000
Tennis Court Resurfacing $20,000 $20,000
Total: $25,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $25,000 $25,000
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$20,000 $20,000
Grants
Other
Total: $25,000 $20,000 0 0 0 $45,000
34
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Friendly Marsh
PARK SIZE ACRES: 34.5 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Friendly Marsh is located at 2191 Apache Street
PARK AMENITIES:
• Paved walking trail
• Natural area
PARK IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS:
• Potential site for additional park use (soccer, archery, etc.)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
35
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Hagstrom King
PARK SIZE ACRES: 9.6 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Hagstrom King is located at 555 Mendota Heights Road
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth baseball/softball field (240 feet), fenced, backstop safety net, pitching mound, dugout covers
• Playground area (half updated 2019, half updated in 2003)
• Concrete basketball full court (updated in 2020)
• Pond, natural area, paved walking trail
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• None
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
36
TOTAL COST: $135,000
PARK NAME: Ivy Hills
PARK SIZE ACRES: 9.1 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Ivy Hills is located at 645 Butler Ave
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth softball field (180,240,180 feet)-not fenced
• Playground equipment (replaced in 2007)
• Concrete basketball half court
• Pond, natural area, paved walking trail
• 2 Tennis Courts-Sport Tile Surface (Replaced in 2015)
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Playground equipment replacement (2024)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Playground Equipment $135,000 $135,000
Total: $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$135,000
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000
37
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Kensington
PARK SIZE ACRES: 14.5 Acres
DESCRIPTION: North Kensington is located at 640 Mendota Heights South. South Kensington is located at 2627
Concord Way
PARK AMENITIES:
• North Kensington
o Pond, natural area, paved walking trail
• South Kensington
o 2 adult soccer/lacrosse fields (330x230’ and 360’x234’)
o Concession building with restrooms
o 2 picnic shelters
o Playground equipment (updated in 2011)
o Pond, natural area, paved walking trail
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• None
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
38
TOTAL COST: $134,008
PARK NAME: Marie
PARK SIZE ACRES: 6.6 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Marie Park is located at 1780 Lilac Lane
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth softball field (180,210,200 feet)-not fenced
• Hockey rink (200’x84’) with asphalt surface, lighting, and warming house (constructed in 2015)
o Adjacent pleasure rink
o Pickleball lines are on hockey rink surface for seasonal use
• Playground equipment (updated in 2005)
• Concrete full court basketball court (updated in 2019)
• 2 tennis courts (asphalt replaced in 2019)
• Pond, natural area, paved walking trails
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Playground equipment replacement (2021)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Playground Equipment $134,008 $134,008
Total: $134,008 0 0 0 0 $134,008
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $71,508 $71,508
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other $62,500 $62,500
Total: $134,008 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,008
39
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Market Square
PARK SIZE ACRES: .24 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Located within the Village Development
PARK AMENITIES:
• Neighborhood commons-open/passive area, fountains, paved walking trails, picnic tables
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Concert venue with stage and sound system (Council goal: “enhance connections with community partners,
businesses, and residents thru community and social events”)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
40
TOTAL COST: $865,000
PARK NAME: Mendakota
PARK SIZE ACRES: 19.7 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Mendakota is located at 2171 Dodd Road
PARK AMENITIES:
• 4 adult softball fields (290’/300’ outfield fences)
• 1 youth soccer field (240’x120’)
• Concession building with restrooms and elevated covered viewing deck
• Double batting cage (30’x80’ with electrical outlets)
• Asphalt basketball full court
• Playground equipment (updated in 2013)
• Picnic shelter with electricity
• Paved walking path
• Grass volleyball court
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Dugouts are being proposed (2021)
• Lighting is being proposed (2022)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Dugouts $75,000 $75,000
Lights $790,000 $790,000
Total: $75,000 $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $865,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $75,000 $790,000 $865,000
Water Revenue Fund
Grants
Other
Total: $75,000 $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $865,000
41
TOTAL COST: $285,000
PARK NAME: Rogers Lake
PARK SIZE ACRES: 8.7 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Rogers Lake is located at 1000 Wagon Wheel Trail
PARK AMENITIES:
• Sand volleyball-timber border
• Skate park-tier 1
• Picnic shelter with electric
• Fishing pier, no swim beach
• Concrete basketball half court
• Playground equipment (updated in 2008)
• Pond, natural area, paved walking trail
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Skate park reconstruction (2021)
• Playground replacement (2025)
• Fishing Pier reconstruction (2023)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Skate Park Reconstruction $125,000 $125,000
Fishing Pier Replacement $20,000 $20,000
Playground Reconstruction $140,00 $140,000
Total: $125,000 0 $20,000 0 $140,000 $285,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$125,000 $20,000 $140,000 $285,000
Grants
Other
Total: $125,000 0 $20,000 0 $140,000 $285,000
42
TOTAL COST: $110,000
PARK NAME: Sibley
PARK SIZE ACRES: 10.8 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Sibley is located at 1819 Delaware Avenue. The park is maintained and scheduled by ISD 197. A
maintenance and use agreement was formalized in 1990 which expires in 2030.
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 soccer field (330’x195’)
• 1 softball field (280’)
• 1 softball field (300’)
• 1 baseball field (330,380,330 feet)
• Double batting cage (30’x80’)
• Concession building with restrooms
• Paved walking trails
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: None
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Maintenance Costs $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $110,000
Total: $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $110,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $110,000
Grants
Other
Total: $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $110,000
43
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Tot Lot
PARK SIZE ACRES: .9 Acres
DESCRIPTION:
• Open space
PARK AMENITIES:
• Open space
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Potential gardening plot site
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
44
TOTAL COST: $130,000
PARK NAME: Valley
PARK SIZE ACRES: 93.5 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Valley Park is located at 821 Marie Avenue
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth baseball field (175 feet)-no fence
• Double tennis court-sport tile surface
• Picnic shelter-no electricity
• Concrete half basketball court (repaved in 2020, bollards installed)
• Playground area (updated in 2007)
• Nature area, paved walking trails
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Playground equipment replacement (2023)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Playground Replacement $130,000 $130,000
Total: $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $130,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$130,000 $130,000
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $130,000
45
TOTAL COST: $95,000
PARK NAME: Valley View Heights
PARK SIZE ACRES: .6 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Valley View Heights is located at 1056 Cullen Avenue
PARK AMENITIES:
• Asphalt basketball half court
• Playground equipment (updated in 2006)
• Paved walking trail
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Playground equipment renovation (2022)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Playground Equipment $95,000 $95,000
Total: $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
$95,000 $95,000
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,000
46
TOTAL COST: $0
PARK NAME: Victoria Highlands
PARK SIZE ACRES: 6.7 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Victoria Highlands is located at 1700 Diane Road
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth softball field (270,285,270 feet)
• Concrete basketball half court
• Playground equipment (2009 update)
• Pond, nature area, paved walking trails
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Playground equipment replacement (2027)
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
None
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund
Other Government
Fund/Levy
Grants
Other
Total: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
47
TOTAL COST: $185,000
PARK NAME: Wentworth
PARK SIZE ACRES: 10.4 Acres
DESCRIPTION: Wentworth Park is located at 739 Wentworth Avenue
PARK AMENITIES:
• 1 youth softball field (220,235,210 feet)-no fence
• Concrete basketball half court
• 2 picnic shelters
• Hockey rink-unpaved (200’x84’) and warming house
o Adjacent pleasure rink
• 2 tennis courts (asphalt)
• Playground equipment (half updated in 2019, half updated in 2005)
• Pond, nature area, paved walking trails
PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED:
• Tennis court reconstruction
• Warming house replacement
• Parking lot reconstruction and pave pedways
• Pave hockey rink
PARK MAP:
Project Costs 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL:
Tennis Court Reconstruction $85,000 $85,000
Warming House Replacement $175,000 $175,000
Parking Lot Improvements $90,000 $90,000
Pave Hockey Rink $15,000 $15,000
Total: $265,000 $85,000 $15,000 0 0 $365,000
FUNDING SOURCES: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL
Special Park Fund $30,000 $30,000
Other Government Fund/Levy $235,000 $85,000 $15,000 $335,000
Grants ($180,000) ($180,000)
Other
Total: $85,000 $85,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $185,000
48