2000-10-10 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda Packet (2)CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
October 107 2000
6:30 p.m. -Large Conference Room
Call to Order
2. Roll Call
September 14, 2000 Minutes
4. Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Yeaz 2001 through 2005
5. Playground Resilient Resurfacing
6. Traffic Calming -Decorah Lane
Updates
• September Recreation Report
• Police Reports
Adjourn
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities aze available upon request at least 120 hours.
in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights
will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short
notice. Please contact City Administration at (651) 452-1850 with requests.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 14, 2000
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held
on Thursday, September 14, 2000, in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101
Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.
The following Commissioners were present: Chair Richard Spicer, and Commissioners
Dave Libra, Stan Linnell, and Raymond Morris, Commissioners Jay Liberacki, Ann
Connelly, and Lawrence Craighead were excused from the meeting. City Staff present
were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander, Recreation Programmer Mary Hapka and
Administrative Assistant Patrick C. Hollister. Mr. Hollister took the minutes.
MINUTES
Commissioner Libra moved approval of the July 11, 2000 minutes.
Commissioner Morris seconded the motion.
AYES:
NAYS:
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FOR ROGERS LAKE PARK
Mr. Kullander informed the Commission that there is a small pond adjacent to Wagon
Wheel Trail that drains into Rogers Lake first through a culvert, then along an open ditch,
then into a second culvert that empties into the lake. Mr. Kullander continued that Parks
Leadperson Terry Blum has requested that the Commission consider the installation of a
new culvert that would connect the existing culverts and eliminate the ditch that would be
filled in level with the existing turf. Mr. Kullander said that this would result in a large
level turf area for activities and would make the maintenance of this area easier for the
parks crew.
Commissioner Morris moved to recommend that the Council allow up to $6000 to be
spent from the Special Parks Fund to install the new culvert.
Commissioner Libra seconded the motion.
AYES:
NAYS:
REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A DIRT 'MOUNTAIN BIKE" RAMP
Mr. Kullander presented a letter from Mr. Matt Gregorie of 2452 Pond Circle East
requesting that the City construct a mountain bike ramp on the open field near the
intersection of Mendota Heights Road and Huber Drive. Mr. Kullander also presented
the letter that he had written to Mr. Gregorie in response asking for further clarification.
Mr. Kullander said that Mr. Gregorie had not contacted him further.
The Commission agreed that a mountain bike ramp would be very unlikely to be
approved by the Council and that it would pose significant liability concerns for the City
and visual, noise, dust, and traffic concerns for the neighbors.
PLAYGROUND SITE REVIEWS
Ms. Hapka presented a memorandum detailing her tour with Mr. Kevin Belfanz of the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust on August 18`h to inspect the condition of
park playgrounds. Ms. Hapka said that she and Mr. Belfanz toured the playgrounds at
Valley Park, Marie Park, Wentworth Park, Hagstrom King, Mendakota Park, Rogers
Park, Friendly Hills Park, Kensington Park, and Victoria Highlands. Ms. Hapka provided
a letter and written summary of suggestions for each park from Mr. Belfanz,
Chair Spicer congratulated Mary on her inspection with Mr. Belfanz. Chair Spicer
moved to instruct Staff to make whatever repairs suggested by Mr. Belfanz they could
accomplish in-house and to return to the Parks Commission with any requests to allocate
funds to contract out any repairs that needed outside help.
Commissioner Morris seconded the motion.
AYES:
NAYS:
USE OF LOW OR "0" PHOSPHORUS IN LAWN FERTILIZERS
Mr. Kullander presented to the Commission copies of City Ordinances from the Cities of
Stillwater and Plymouth regulating the use of phosphorus in fertilizers. Mr. Kullander
said that a resident had given him these ordinances and had asked if the City would
consider adopted a similar ordinance.
Commissioner Libra moved to direct Staff to inform the residents of this issue and to
advise them on environmentally sound practices in the City's newsletter.
Commissioner Morris seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
City of Mendota Heights
Memo
September 8, 2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2001 thru 2005
Background:
Development of a current Five Year Capital Improvement Plan was tabled by
the Commission until a determination of funding capabilities from the Special Park
Fund, the City's General Fund or some other source could be determined.
The City Council has directed that for the next three years all income
revenues the City receives from Cell Phone companies with antennas attached to
the Water Tower will go the Special Park Fund. This will result in a $60,000.00 per
year contribution to the Fund.
The City Council requested the Commission develop a Capital Improvement
Plan that will be presented to the Council for consideration.
Discussion:
The Commission has listed, prioritized, canceled, or tabled many projects the
past several years, often because of lack of funding. At the next Commission
meeting I will attempt to compile a complete list of all projects previously discussed
and present them in a format so that those the Commission wishes included in a
Five Year Plan can be prioritized and a year designated for completion assigned.
I will also present an update of the current status of the Special Park Fund
and try to predict future fund balances with inclusion of the new revenues pledged
to the Fund by the City Council.
Action Required:
Be prepared to discuss priorities of various projects under consideration for
nclusion in a Five Year 2001-2005 Park Capital Improvement Plan to be presented
to the City Council for adoption.
September 1 1,2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Parks Five Year (2001 2005) Capital Improvement Plan
Background:
The Commission tabled development of a Capital Improvement
Plan until future funding options to supplement the existing Special
Park Fund had been determined. The City Council has directed that
revenue from Cell Phone Company's rental of space on the City Water
Tower would be directed to the Special Park Fund for the next three
years. This amounts to approximately $60,000.00 per year.
The following data summarizes existing park facilities needs and
conditions. Also included are past proposals for various park
improvements or upgrades.
City Council requests the Commission prepare a current Five Year
Plan that addresses the replacement of aging timber play equipment in
several parks.
The following information is grouped by use or function rather
than by park location. j
Function / headings are: - Warming Houses �r`R
- Ice Rinks U
Play Equipment
Trails
- Ball fields
- Long Range Park Planning
- Amenities, etc.
WARMING HOUSES:
�r4�;
1. Marie Park -Built in 1970-16'x28'=448 SgFt
-2 Metal Doors -Gas Space Heater
-No Windows -Painted in 1999
-Current condition... FAIR
-Replacement cost: 448 sq.ft.x $40 = S 18,000
Needs: a. Re -grade around building. $ 1,000
b. Replace two metal doors @ $600 ea $ 11200
1 c. ADA upgrades: ramps, handrails, paved
path from parking area $ 51000
6%1 d. Outside benches-4 @ $200 $ 800
> e. Exterior lighting $ 1,000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: b. @ $1,200
2. Friendly Hills Park -Built in 1970-16'x28'=448 sq ft
-2 Metal Doors -Gas space heater
-No windows -Painted in 1999
-ADA ramp to doors added in 1998
-New siding installed in 1998
-Current condition: Good to Fair
-Replacement cost 448 x $40= $18,000
Needs: a. ADA: path, hand rails from house to rinks $ 6,000
b. Replace two metal doors @ $600 ea $ 11200
c. Exterior lighting $ 11000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: b. @ $1,200
3. Wentworth Park -Built pre-1970-14'x18'=252 sq ft
-2 Metal Doors -Gas Space heater
-No windows -Painted in 1999
-Current condition: Fair to Good (Cramped)
-Replacement cost: $18 to $40,000
Needs: a. Larger building. (1) Enlarge to 28'x18' @ $101000
(2) Move house from Ivy Park @ $6,000 (3) Build
new 500 sq ft @ $20,000 or more.
b. ADA: paved path to rinks, hand rails $ 61000
c. Exterior lighting $ 1 ,000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE
Users have requested larger building.
4. Ivy Park — Not in use. Identical in age and size as those located in
Marie and Friendly Hills Parks.
ICE RINKS:
1. Marie Park -Small free skating area w/1 light pole
-Hockey rink developed pre-1970
-6 Existing light poles, pre-1970
-Current condition: Very Poor. Boards
and support posts require replacement
-Cost to replace boards: $1 1/000400
-Current condition of lighting system is
poor: Replacement cost $12,000.00
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
Rink is usable but requires continuous replacement of boards and
posts, which is a very difficult task. Posts are out of plumb and
alignment due to frost heaves. Complete removal and replacement
of posts and boards should occur within the near future. Existing
light poles are leaning. Light fixtures are dated and inefficient.
2. Friendly Hills -Largest free skating rink w/ 2 light poles
-Hockey boards replaced in 1998
-Hockey rink paved with bituminous in 1998
-6 light poles cover hockey rink. Poles and
light fixtures are dated and inefficient.
-Current condition: Good to excellent
-Cost to replace lighting system: $121000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
3. Wentworth -Medium size free skating rink w/ 2 light poles
-Hockey boards replaced in 1997
-6 light poles cover hockey rink. Poles and light
fixtures are dated and inefficient.
-Current condition: Good to Excellent
-Cost to replace lighting system: $12,000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
4. Ivy Hills Park -Hockey boards removed in 1993
-Free skating rink removed in 1996
-Warming house still in place. Options are
to move to Wentworth Park or demolish.
-Skating discontinued due to lack of use and
poor soil conditions that resulted in unsafe
and inconsistent ice conditions.
5. Future Skating Possibilities:
' The City Council is currently considering the skating arena
proposal presented by St. Thomas Academy. Council members have
reported positive interest in this idea from many residents. If the City
does participate in such an arena, opportunities may exist for "free
skating" time for residents or youth teams that could reduce the e
for City skating facilities currently provided.
. �b0� •`W" � Op
PLAY EQUIPMENT:
Note: 1. Play equipment installed must include solid surfacing, p/ay
elements and access points to accommodate ADA requirements. The
solid surfacing adds approximately 10 % to 15 % to the cost and
installation of new equipment.
2. Equipment installed in 1990 averaged $17,500 per park. At
today's prices that would be approximately $27,000 which includes
the solid surface areas to meet ADA guidelines.
3. The older timber structures to be removed include an
attached swing(s). Current safety guidelines do not allow swings to be
attached to platform/play structures. The swings must be freestanding
with fall/safety areas surrounding the swing unit(s).•When the existing
timber tower/climber is removed and replaced with equipment that
meets the current guidelines the border area must be enlarged to
accommodate a new double swing unit(s).
1. Ivy Park -New Equipment installed in 1990
-Current condition: Good
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
If no changes or improvements are made to this park it is not
necessary to make immediate ADA upgrades. ADA upgrades would
include installation of a solid surface path from the timber border to the
play equipment, a transfer point platform and additional play
components. Approximate cost: $7,000 to $10,000.-
2. Wentworth -1970 Timber unit modified in 1990-this unit
does not meet current C.P.Safety Guidelines
-New equipment installed in 1990
-In 1995 additional swings & play components
plus resilient surfacing added. Meets ADA.
-Current condition: Good to Excellent
Removal of 1970 timber components can be done at any time with
little impact on current level of service. Most of these play elements are
redundant. Area left open due to removal can be used for new
components suitable for two to five year olds and be installed on
resilient surfacing.
-Removal cost or timber unit: $1,000
-New play structure for tots : $10 to $14,000
-Existing border area adequate for new equip.
3. Valley Park -1970 Timber unit modified in 1990-does not
meet current C.P. Safety Guidelines
-New equipment added in 1990
-Current condition: Adequate —Removal of
timber units and replacement equipment
should be a high priority
-This play area is in a constricted area due to creek, parking lot and
mature trees. Expansion of timber border area is limited. Due to these
restrictions any new components should come from previous supplier
so that new interchangeable modular units can be installed on existing
support posts.
-Removal cost of timber unit: $1,000
New play
components: $12
to
$1 6,000
including
resilient surfacing
to
meet ADA
4. Roger's Lake -1970 Timber unit modified in 1.990-this unit
does not meet CPS guidelines. Timber border
area for this unit is separate from new
equipment installed in 1990. Removal of the
timber units will not lower level of service -most
play elements are redundant.
-Current level of service: Good
-Removal of timber unit: $1,000
New play components: $10 to $151000
including resilient surfacing.
-Existing border area adequate.
5. Marie Park -Timber unit replaced in 2000 with "Tiny Tot"
structure plus double swing (4 swings) unit at
a cost of $17,800. Required enlarged timber
border area.
-New equipment installed 1990
-Does not meet ADA. No resilient surfacing to
components. Cost to add access point and
resilient surfacing: $4,000.
-Current condition: Excellent to Good
6. ' Friendly Hills -1970 Timber units upgraded in 1990
-New equipment installed in 1990
-Current conditions: Fair to Good
Upgrades will require: -Removal of old timber unit @ $1,000
Add resilient surfacing and new components
suitable for tots @ $12 to $151000,
-Border timbers may need to be extended -but
existing area is limited by steep slope and
mature trees.
7. Victoria -Highlands -Park developed in 1992. Large border area.
-Equipment is in three separate areas.
-Does not include resilient surfaced areas that
meet ADA guidelines.
Current condition: Good
Upgrades will require: -Addition of resilient surfacing and new
component modules that meet ADA guidelines. Use of original
equipment supplier would allow easier changeover using existing
support poles. ADA upgrades could all occur at one existing group of
play components. Estimated cost: $7,000 to $10,000&
8. Mendakota -Park developed in 1991. Largest play structure
system. Contains adequate resilient surfaced
area and components. Some components do not
meet current CPS Guidelines.
-Current condition: Good
Upgrades to this park should include removal and replacement of
"spring toys" in pea rock area and addition of "spring toys" in resilient
surfaced area. Replacement of "glide" swing with a Bucket swing
suitable for handicap child is also recommended. Paint touch ups and
general "housekeeping" of area is required. Estimated cost: $7000 to
$9,000,
9. Kensington -Park developed in 1992. Large border area
allows room to add "spring toys".
-Components require paint touchups
-Flexible drain tile should be installed in wet
areas and connected to curb drain
-Resilient surfacing needs repair.
-Current condition: Good
Cost to "spruce up" this play area and add some "spring toys": $5,000
10. Valley View Heights (Curley tot lot)
Timber equipment installed in 1989.
Consists of timber tower with 2 swing
components attached plus a third free-
standing swing unit.
-Timber border edging is too close to play
elements -does not meet CPS Guidelines.
Current condition: Fair to Good
Upgrades to this play area should be removal of swing units attached
to tower. These could be reinstalled in a location with correct safety
zones. Timber border area must be enlarged near third free standing
swing unit and to accommodate re -installed swings. Play components
that meet ADA guidelines with resilient surfacing would also require
enlarged timber border areas and a paved access path (30 to 40 feet)
from existing trail. Estimated cost: $10,000 to $14,000. Remaining
timber structure should be cleaned, wood dressed, and touch up
painting.
11. Hagstrom-King -Park developed in mid-1980's by housing
developer as part of Park Contribution.
-Timber structure is dated some components do
not meet CPS Guidelines. Does not meet ADA
requirements.
Current condition: Fair to Good
Upgrading this play area presents some "special" options. Some of the
existing timber equipment can, with minor modifications, can be kept in
use. Those elements removed that do not meet CPS Guidelines could
be replaced in the same location with an enlarged border area...
OR...
New equipment, with resilient surfacing, could be installed at a new
location or on the existing concrete half -basketball court. Benches and
other amenities could be added to make this a specialized tot play area.
The basketball court could be reinstalled south of the existing location
in an open area that was leveled for a possible tennis court. The only
other full basketball court in now located in Men Dakota Park.
Note: This much of an alteration in the park should be presented to the
neighborhood before proceeding with specific plans.
12. Future Play Areas
The Town Center development at the corner of Dodd and Hwy
110 is proposing 145 housing units (60 senior & 85 residential).
Several inquiries requesting a park or play area be developed in the area
east of Dodd, north of Hwy 110, west of Delaware, and south of
Wentworth have been discussed during the past ten years. Lack of a
suitable site and cost have been the main factors that have tabled
discussion on these requests. The Town Center project will probably
awaken this issue.
Trails:
1. Expansion /extension of bituminous paved trails.
Extending existing trails, connecting "missing" segments, and
development of new trails has been routinely discussed by the
Commission. Following is a brief description and comments regarding
past trail discussions.
a. Trail along Delaware south of Hwy 110, The City
constructed widened shoulder from Hwy 110 to Huber. Construction of
separated trails must wait until Dakota County upgrades (widens)
Delaware, which is a County Road. At that time they will buy additional
right-of-way thus allowing the installation of a separated path.
b. Victoria Rd. south of Marie at Celia Road. This is a County
Road which has been upgraded by the County this year in preparation
of "turning back" the jurisdiction of this road to Mendota Heights. Once
this is done the City can use State Aid Funds to install storm sewers
along the road, fill in the ditch, and install the missing trail link from
Celia to Celia Rd.
c. Lexington from Mendota Heights Road to Wagon Wheel and
Wagon Wheel from Lexington to Hwy 35E Bridge. These two segments
have been approved by City Council and currently plans are being
prepared for construction. Acquiring easements has slowed the project,
but progress will pick up this fall and construction should occur in
2001.
d. Dakota County has proposed construction of the North
Urban Regional Trail, which will begin in Lilydale and extend to South
St. Paul. In Mendota Heights the trail will go along the existing Valley
Park trail, along Hwy 1 10 beginning at Dodd, and along the Hwy 110
frontage road to Delaware and into West St. Paul, etc.
The trail segment next to Town Center will be enhanced as a sort
of "gateway" to Town Center, Park Fund contributions from the Town
Center Development may be used to enhance the trail amenities in this
area.
2. Cross County Ski Trails
A beginning trail segment has been planned for Valley Park in the
area north of the parking lot/ball field, which would make a connection
point at Bachelor Avenue and link up to a possible trail on the Par 3
Golf Course. The Council does not want cross-country ski trails to use
existing bituminous trails or bridges in Valley Park. The beginning
segment, estimated to cost $5,000, follows a double loop course
without crossing existing streams in the park. Extending the trail
beyond this area will required culverts or bridges over stream in the
park, which will add to future ski, trail development. The beginning first
cross county ski trail segment has not been approved by City Council.
Ball fields:
1 . Softball: There have been no requests for additional softball
fields in the past several years.
2. Baseball: The commission has received requests for the
development of full size baseball field(s). Currently the only City
developed full size field is located at Sibley Park. The City also
constructed two youth size baseball/adult softball fields at Sibley Park.
These fields do not have permanent mounds nor grass infields.
The Mendota Heights Athletic Association has proposed that two
of the four full size softball fields at Mendakota Park be converted to
baseball fields with permanent mounds and grass infields. This proposal
has not been discussed by the Park Commission but this will be on a
future meeting agenda for discussion.
The Commission did consider developing a full size baseball field
at the Friendly Hills Marsh Park (off Apache St), but this proposal was
tabled due to lack of interest and the desire to find a more accessible
site.
Another possible, affordable, site that may become a future
option would be the St. Thomas land south of Mendota Heights Rd.
This has been mentioned in conjunction with the building of an Ice
Arena on the parcel.
3. Soccer Fields
The City currently has four youth overlay fields in neighborhood
parks, a dedicated youth field at Mendakota Park, one large size field at
Sibley Park, and two full size fields at Kensington Park.
There have been no recent requests for the City to construct an
additional soccer field.
Long Range Planning
1. Park Plans.
The City commissioned the first Parks Plan in 1971.
Recommendations from this study guided the parkland acquisition and
development during the 1970's when the pace of residential
development had increased. In 1985 the City Council hired the firm of
Barton-Aschman to prepare the "1985 Park and Recreation Facility
Needs Study". This study outlined the park needs, which were
presented to residents and finally resulted in the passage of the Parks
Referendum in 1989.
The Commission on several occasions has discussed the value or
need for a Park or City Natural Resource Plan, which serve as a guide
for re-establishment on native plant species to City Park and open
spaces.
A preliminary proposal requesting the City Council to hire a
consultant to prepare DNR grant applications was presented to Council.
Council did not discuss this proposal at the time, requesting additional
information or a funding source other than the Special Park Fund,
Park Amenities /Needs
1 . Bleachers for Kensington Soccer Fields
Four bleachers for this park were purchased and placed in the
park in 1993. At some point they were moved to Mendakota Park for a
softball tournament and have remained there since providing seating for
the many games played at this complex. One drawback the park
maintenance crews encountered with the bleachers was weeds and
grass growing where they could not mow. They have requested that if
bleachers are again to be purchased for or moved back to Kensington
Park that concrete pads first be installed. Each concrete pad,
approximately 12' by 25', will cost $1 ,500, four are required.
Bleachers, three tiered, cost $1,000 each. Total for four locations
would be $10,000.00 if four new bleacher units were purchased.
2. Park Storage Building at Mendakota Park
This is not an amenity, but where else could I include this item.
Parks Leadperson Terry Blum has annually asked that a storage building
be constructed in this park. The idea has not been well received by the
City Council nor has it been fully discussed by the Council. One new
thought is that the Fire Department is requesting the Council fund
construction of a storage / training building on the Fire Hall site in
2002. If this idea is approved by the Council, perhaps the Park
Commission could ask that space for use by the parks maintenance
crew be provided in this building.
3. Safety Netting over Hub area in Mendakota Park
Safety netting was recommended by the Commission in 1994 to
the City Council and was soundly rejected. The Commission
recommended it a second time and again was rebuffed. In 1995 the
Council decided to extend the height of the backstop to prevent foul
tipped balls from hitting people on the Hub building second level.
Recently, on several occasions various Council members have stated
that netting over the Hub area should be installed to protect spectators
from foul balls. Cost for this installation is approximately $25 to
$30,000,
4. Security devices for restrooms in Kensington and Mendakota
Acts of vandalism to the restrooms at these two parks has
occurred several times each year for the past three years. These
senseless acts "call out" for some way to prevent them or catch the
individuals responsible. Other cities are also experiencing the same type
of damage and some have installed alarms, cameras, time locks, etc.
If the Commission desires to try some of these methods they should
establish a budget and direct staff to research and suggest what
method should be employed.
5. Pumps in City ponds to "clean water"
Installing pumps in City ponds to disperse duckweed and algae
growth is a suggestion offered to staff numerous times each summer.
The pumps do not clean the water only disperses the growth to the
edges leaving the center water clear. Installation costs run in the $5 to
$10,000 per pump and electric consumption can be several thousand
per year per pump. There are about five ponds most cited by callers. If
we do one, we will have to do them all.
6. Pedestrian Bridge in Friendly Hiils Park by Tennis Court
This wood bridge has stood well beyond its useful life. The parks
crew would like a culvert installed rather then a replacement bridge so
that they would have a drivable access point to the other side for turf
maintenance. This is a good idea and is less expensive then a bridge.
Estimated cost for this culvert and restoration work: $2,000.00.
City of Mendota Heights
MEMO
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: .Special Park Fund
Discussion:
The balance in the Special Park Fund has "historically" been maintained at a
level in excess of $300,000.00. Do to the dwindling increases to the fund from
park contributions from development of single family lots or re -plats in the
Industrial Park the fund has been drawn down below this level. Balance as of
December 31, 1999 was $262,822.00.
The City Council has pledged to direct approximately $60,000.00 for the
next three years to the Special Park Fund. The following is my attempt to project
the fund balance for the next several years.
Balance as of January 1, 2000 $263,000.00
Park dedications during 2000 $ 79,000,00
Interest Income in 2000 $ 20,000,00
Balance as of December 31, 2000 $3621000.00
2001, 2002, & 2003 Fund Increases
Cell Tower Rent $ 60,000.0O
Interest $ 20,000.0O
Fund Increase December 31, 2001 $ 80,000.00
Fund Increase December 31, 2002 $ 80,000.00
Fund Increase December 31, 2003 $ 80,000,00
Accumulated total does not include additional dedications....... $602,000,00
Possible dedication from various projects (next 5 yrs):
1. Town Center -145 residential units x $750.00 = $108,750,00
Town Center - Commercial est. $ 75,000.00
2. End of Pilot Knob Road (Office or Housing) est. $ 75,000.00
3. Infill single family lots 50 x $750 = $ 37,500.00
$296,250.00
Mendota Heights
Parks System
llde Ceder
LexbWm & Trunk Bd
Frieday HBh
Pueblo lane & AoWw
F rufly Marsh
laea
Hajaerom Ring
Mendoh Road, F of Hubu Dore
t m Park
Butler Avenue & W "Dane
Kenlincom
Stockbeida & Cmmed Way
Muie PIA
Betweae Vt7aea &
Mendakoh Park
Dodd Road & Mmdakoh Driae
Rogers We
Wagm Wheed TnB
Sibley Park
Hare & Dehwre Avenue
Valley Park
Fag of k3 m W Awue
VWOo HI hhnds
Victoria & Dm&s flood
Wentworth
wentxvth A
City of Mendota Heights
��lC-Ti'd.7
October 6, 2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Playground Resilient Surfacing
Background:
In my memo "Parks Five Year Capital Improvement Plan" dated September
11`h, 2000 1 estimated the cost of resilient surfacing at 10% to 15% per play area.
In recent discussion with play equipment suppliers and installers I believe this
estimate should be raised to approximately 25% per play area.
In existing play areas the City has installed eight inches (average depth) of
pea gravel for the general play area and rubberized matting on compacted gravel or
concrete in those areas where a more accessible solid surfacing was desired.
Installation of a rubberized surfacing on a concrete base costs from $8.00 to
$10.00 per square foot. In our play areas that currently do not have rubberized
surfacing, when upgraded, will require from 400 to 600 square feet of surfacing
material at a cost of $4,000 to $6,000 per area.
The City of St. Paul is currently bidding new or upgraded play areas with
50% accessible components per play area and are now specifying twelve inches of
wood fiber for resilient surfacing. Personally I am not a proponent of using wood
fiber because of the high maintenance required.
Attached is some information regarding ADA compliance in playground
design.
Action Required
No action required. This is for information only.
PLA.YGUIDEm BULLETIN NO. 2>
PlaygroundAccessibility/
ADA Compliance
In 1992, the Amer cans with D sab lit es Act
(ADA) of 1990 became effective. This federal
law prohibits disability -based discrimination
by states, local governments and private entities
(such as restaurants or child-care centers)
that provide public accommodation. The law
expands and helps clarify Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. It applies to new
and existing play areas — meaning that
you must bring all playgrounds into ADA
compliance.
The Americans with Disabilities Act offers no
specific definition of what makes a play-
ground "accessible." How -eve; a nationally
recognized industrial standards organiza-
tion, the American Society for Testing and
Materials, has written guidelines in response to ADA.
Published in 1993, the ASTAI F1487-93 Standard is a 26-
page document that provides specific guidance on designing
playgrounds and play equipment for accessibility and safety.
[n 1994, the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers
Compliance Board (ATBCB) took a major step toward
clarifying ADA rules by appointing a Recreation Access
Advisory Committee to develop specific acces-
sibility guidelines for all recreational areas;
All ng playgrounds. This committee's
recommendations have been reviewed and
modified by a regulatory negotiation com-
mittee established in 1996. If accepted, their
recommendations will add requirements
beyond the ASTM standards for accessibilim
The public has given their comments on the
proposed desigrr guidelines to the Access
Board. After review of these comments, the
Board is expected to make changes as neces-
sary, then publish the final guidelines by
early in the year 2000. These guidelines will beco
standard of pract ce and the legal bas s for
de[emrining compliance with the ADA. Only
new or altered play areas will be affected -
The guidelines, as proposed, require look ng
at play areas as a collection of individual
play components to determine the minimum
amount required to be accessible. Minimum
requirements are based on the number of
ground level and elevated play components
prow ded.
Access to ground level components is
required to at least one of each type provided
and in a number equal to at least one-half
of the number of elevated play components
provided. An accessible surface to each com-
ponent is required.
Access to at least 50 percent of the elevated play components
s equired. Access by way of a transfer system is acceptable
when less than 20 elevated play components are provided. If
20 or more are provided, then a ramp is required to at least
25 percent.
A simple chart can be used to show minimum
accessibility
requirements:
co
; ay P :: s 9M n,; 1e e
- ee
_
_ -
.-.
-5accesc:*M
3=Ssa11
go
7-19
sc°°
Sfj°°
None
for example
2
c
e
C
20 wus
se°.°
2530
o.°
For Exa..,ple
zc
io
Anything else is cutting corners:`
Knou, pour responsibilities
gander the AAA.
Before we look at specific ways to achieve equal play access
for all children, it's important to understand your legal
responsibilities under the ADA
The ADA specifically requires hat "each env ce, progra or
activity conducted by a public entity. when viewed in its
entirety, be readily accessible to, and usable by, individuals
with disabilities."
The law covers ''both indoor and outdoor areas where
human -constructed imprc ements, structures, equipment or
property have been added to the natural environment "
Any individual or group can file a complaint that charges
discrimination on the basis of disability. The Department of
the Interior is responsible for administering the law as it
relates to parks and recreation areas.
"igual" doesn't always aaaean "identical."
An accessible playground is one that offers a range of "like
or similar' play experiences to children of varying abilities.
This does not mean that each and every feature or event
must be usable by even child.
For example. a playground that offers swinging, sliding.
climbing and manipulative or interactive experiences must
provide comparable experiences for all. But, if it has several
slides and tvvo or more swings, it is considered accessible if
children with disabilities can use one of the slides and one
of the swings.
Siart yaur design aritb ara aeressibla path.
..
ZIP
DWIPA
In designing a playground, your first step is to provide an
accessible route of travel to the play area. This should
nclude an accessible protective surfacing to each structure
or freestanding event that is intended to be used by children
with disabilities.
- MINIMUM USE ZONE
PERIMETER
T)picataccessible play area EDGER
witb similar opportunities -
available to al! - _� `CLIMBE-fj' _
-
`
SWINGS (' - - - - - -, ,
NO '.C-_ _ - , I''`I .'c i
IN
OPPORTUNITY - - -' - _ ,LOQS E"PNCO i TIV€'SURFACING /
TRANSFER
SPACE , �� 56
5 DIAMETER'
IT
PARKING - - - 4e.
SPACE - y.
30'TO 48' - _ -- 40"
OUT OF
PATH OF j -
TRAVEL ACCh�SSiELE ROUTE
OFTAVEL 32
5' MINI" WIDTH 24 � � -
L i e„
16
SPRING RIDERS
HOCKING OPPORTUNITY
PARKING OUT OF THE PATH
OFTRAVEL
P L :A Y G U I DE" BULLETIN
COMPOSITE
PLAYSTRUCTURE
CLIME ING AND SLIDING
OPPORTUNITY
rivim
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
RAISED 30" WITH A
RETAINING WALL
ACTIVITY PANELS
AT GROUND LEVEL
TRANSFER POINT
ADJACENT PARKING/
TRANS FER SPACE
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
�-- TO OTHER FACILITIES
5' h11NIMUM1t WIDTH
Combining loose and synthetic surfaces is a common solu-
tion. If you choose this approach. be aware of potential trip
hazards where the wood fiber, sand or other loose material
meets the unitary surface. Also, take steps to prevent wheel-
chairs from dropping off the access path's edge and tipping
over (Gradually sloping — 300 or less — the transition
edge is a common solution.) If possible, use loose materi-
als along only one side of the unitary surface to further
minimize risk.
Your access route should be at least 5 feet Hide to allow two
wheelchairs to pasts. In addition, a tumaround/parking
space at least 5 feet in diameter should be provided neat to
any playstructure that requires transferring from a wheel-
chair onto the structure. The tumaround/parking area must
be off to the sik out of the accessible route of travel.
Ptan for age -appropriate transfer points.
The act of transferring onto a playstructure is similar to
transferring onto a toilet or perhaps a bed. Physical thera-
pists estimate that 40 to 60 percent of wheelchair users can
and will transfer out of their chairs onto a playstructure.
Some children may need help initially Depending on age,
children in wheelchairs need a transfer point between 14
and 18 inches in height to make this transfer by themselves.
Grab bars or other devices should be prodded.
Once these children are on the playstructure, steps no high-
er than 8 inches will let them move about and play with
their peers. Such steps should be at least 14 inches deep and
24 inches wide to accommodate children of various ages
and sizes.
Give rnre, find tbaugP3t la ramp design.
Ramps provide another way for children to access an elevat-
ed deck. They should be at least 36 inches wide, at no more
than a 1:12 slope, and they must have handrails and curbs.
To reduce circulation conflicts and abuse, ramps should be
no more than 12 feet long between level landings. Landings
should be at least 5 feet in diameter to let two wheelchairs
pass and to allow a child in a wheelchair to turn around.
Accessing the structure from an earth bean with a ramp can
minimize the number of ramps and landings as well as the
space and amount of surfacing needed to gain height. The
accessible route of traces can begin outside the play area,
continue up the berm at no more than a 1:20 slope, and
finish with a short rump or bridge to the playstructure. This
design approach is less expensive and more attractive than a
network of ramps and landings. (See 7jpical Accessible
Pla}l Areaplan.)
1'rYdife su, j xlenl d4et3k space on the plapslrudure.
If children can roll their wheelchairs onto an elevated deck,
he deck must be at least 5 feet in diameter so the wheel -
its can turn around. If a transfer point is available on
the deck, provide a space of at least 30 by 48 inches beyond
the timing space for parking. However, leaving an unoccu-
pied wheelchair on an elevated deck is a potential hazard to
other users, and is not recommended except in special
supervised areas.
Exanaise casts early to at�okd comnurn mistakts.
The cost of building an accessible playground varies sub-
stantially, according to the design approach and the materials
used. For example, a structure with ramps, large areas of
accessible safety surfacing, and many equal -access play
events will be more expensive than a playstructure that
meets only the minimum standards for accessibility.
Finding the right balance between accessibility goals and
your budget should be done early in the planning process,
to avoid shortcuts that can lead to expensive mistakes later
on. Many "accessible'' playgrounds fail to meet accessibility
standards for reasons that include:
Users with disabilities were not invroketf in the design process.
No accessible route of travel to the plat area.
Transfer points that are too high for the children using
the playground. (As stated '
earlier, an appropriate height for
a transfer point is 14 to'18 inches, depending on the age of
he user.)
No
means of returning to the transfer deck after
descending as (To avoid this humiliating trea men t of
children with limited lower -bode mobility. steps of an age -
appropriate height — 8" maximum — and size — 24'7
wide. 14" deep — should be located in close proximity to
the slide exit and be available at ground level.)
The playground focuses only on wheelchair access,
ignoring users with impaired vision. hearing loss. decelop-
memal disabilities and other physical or mental challenges.
PLAY GROUN 11 ACCESSIBI
Don I neglect safety.
Safety shouldn't be compromised for accessibility. For
nstance, tactile warnings in loose protective surfacing or
guide rails within the use zone may help the visually
mpaired, but will be a hazard to the majority of users.
There are other ways of orienting a visually impaired child
to playground activities. Much of this orientation
responsibility lies with the care giver.
It's important to note that many amen t es intended for u ers
with disabilities will contribute to an overall improvement in
safety and "user-friendly" design. Ramps, shorter step
heights, roomier decks, hand rails and grab bars can enrich
the play experience for children of all ages and abilities.
Encourage community inrola�ement.
Design ng a playground that provides an ntegrated play
experience for children of all abilities is a real challenge.
Involving Deis with disabilities is perhaps the most impor-
tant step in creating a successful playground for all children.
Docnm$rzt erer}step.
The proposed federal ATBCB access regulations may require
on to document the process and results of making your
playstructures accessible. Your records would need to show,
who was involved in the design, the number of play events
offered, and the access methods provided.
Although these regulations aren't yet in force, it clearly
makes sense to begin documenting your accessibility efforts
now instead of later.
Look to yozdr equipment mannfacturc r for
professional assistance.
W
hether you are looking at your total play area or at specific
equipment needs, your play eqenuipment manufacturer
should be able to help you sure similar plav opportunities
for all users. An accessible playground design from
Landscape Structures is likely to combine ground level activ-
ties, transfer modules. access paths. ramps or earth berms if
needed. and play events designed to be available to all.
're been a leader in defining
anri promoting plr{Seround accessibility.
Landscape Structures has a long history of involvement with
playground accessibility issues since the passage of the ADA
Chairman Steve Bing is the task group chairman of the ASTM
committee that developed the 1993 standards concerning
accessibility in public playground equipment, and he was also
the only manufacturer to serve on the Recreation Access
Adv sort' committee that worked to further define accessibility
standards for the ATBCB.
SOURCES
ASTMF148793, Standard Consumer Safety Performance
Specification for Playground Equipment forPublic Use.
Federal Register, Department ofJusttce, Parllll. 28 CFR Part 36,
July 26, 1990.• Non-d&criminattbn on the Basis of Disability by
PublieAccommodations and in Commercial Facilities Final Rule
Includ&ADAAG (Americans ulitb Disabilities Act Accessibility
Guidelines).
federal Regiser, Department ofJustice, Part D, 28 ffR Part 35, Iuh'
26, 1990: Son -discrimination on theBasLs ofDrsa Vuy in State
and Local Government Seances Final Rule. -
Report oftbeRecreation AccessAdvisory Committee. Arcln'tecture
anQTransportation Compliance Board, 1331 FStreet SW.", Suite
1000, Wasbington, DC20004-1111.
Gn:Form FederalAccessibiliTy Standards, Arebitecture and
Tmnsportah'on Barriers Compliance Board, 1337 F Street <y. W.,
Suite 1000, Wasbington, DC 20004-1111.
f
ISO
Lip
Certified 9NUM :.
Anything else is cutting corners.'
EFAEarl F. Andersen, Inc.
9808 James Circle
OttFAX (612)
1-800-862-6026
:d on
Fax(612) 9�-its>�u"�;:ptapLi-corn
Rac/.led Paeer
Public Playground Safety Checklist
Here are 10 important tips for parents and community groups to keep in mind to help
ensure playground safety.
Make sure surfaces around playground equipment have at least 12 inches of
wood chips, mulch, sand, or pea gravel, or are mats made of safety -tested
rubber or rubber -like materials.
2 Check that protective surfacing extends at least 6 feet in all directions from
play equipment. For swings, be sure surfacing extends, in back and front,
twice the height of the suspending bar.
3 Make sure play structures more than 30 inches high are spaced at least 9
feet apart.
4 Check for dangerous hardware, like open "S" hooks or protruding bolt ends.
5 Make sure spaces that could trap children, such as openings in guardrails or
between ladder rungs. measure less than 3.5 inches or more than 9 inches.
6 Check for sharp points or edges in equipment.
7 Look out for tripping ha:.ards, like exposed concrete footings, tree stumps,
and rocks.
'� Make sure elevated surfaces, like platforms and ramps, have guardrails to
prevent falls.
9 Check playgrounds regularly to see that equipment and surfacing are in
good condition.
1 ® Carefully supervise children on playgrounds to make sure they're safe.
For additional copies, write:
Playground Checklist,
CPSC,
Washington, DC 20207; call
CPSC's toll -free hotline at I-800-638-2772;
or visit
CPSC's
web site at www.cpsc.gov.
009719
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NIEIVIO
October
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FRONT: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Traffic Calming -Decorah Lane
Discussion
Please see the attached memorandum from Interim City Administrator Jim Danielson to
the Planning Commission and the minutes from the September 26, 2000 meeting of the
Planning Commission. The Council intends to discuss this issue at their regular meeting
November 21, 2000. While this is primarily a traffic engineering and planning issue, the
Council felt that the Parks Commission might also wish to comment on the desirability of
traffic calming.
Action Required
' The Parks and Recreation Commission may add any comments on this issue for Council
consideration on November 21, 2000.
with neighboring re
Commissioner Vitelli suggested meetingsidents along Decorah before these
recommendations were enforced to gain support. Public Woilts Director Danielson noted this
would be done over the next couple of months.
Commissioner Friel stated he remembers three permanent stop sians were added to the Decorah
Lane and Ocala Lane intersection as well as a crosswalk' He noted a light was also proposed for
this area but was denied after signatures were gainll over residents -that drive in
ed from we
the area Commissioner Friel stated felt the crosswalk at this intersection was not necessary as
he has not seen a pedestrian in all his drives past this area.
Commissioner Friel asked if the suggestions before the Commission were comments or
recommendations. Public Works Director Danielson indicated the suggestions were
recommendations for the Commission to review and revise.
The Commission concurred with recommendations two through six. Chair Duggan suggested
Council determine item number one at a future meeting.
Commissioner Betlej moved to approve the recommendations w traffic calming along Decorah
Lane as submitted and that they determine if item number one was necessary.
Commissioner Friel seconded the motion.
AYES: _ 7
NAYS: 0
At`tTENNA ORDL`lANCE AIVLE`iDMENT
Chair Duggan explained this was a public hearing for the purpose of discussion on the Antenna
Ordinance Amendment addressing antennas on buildings.
Public Workks Director Danielson indicated this item arose from a request for a han radio tower
request in the past. He noted the Zoning Ordinance needs to address building mounted antennas
which was not covered within the current language.
Planner Grittman stated he did an initial draft of the Ordinance language, which was reviewed by
staff and legal counsel. He indicated the review by legal counsel recommended satellite dishes
riuman noted satellite dishes under one meter are exempt
be left out of th s Ordinance. Planner G
from the limitations set within this Ordinance as set by the FCC.
Planner Grim: rt noted the height above the rooiline has been increased from ten feet to vveive
feet or reasonable height, which leaves the burden on the applicant. He stated the new language
allows for one �acrina and one tower per lot. Planner Grittrnan indicated the loca,ion could not
be unreasonable restricted by the City but that the City could restrict use in the pudic right of
�Nr ay.
1 i 5/2E/00
3. Add the following sign:
20 MPH
4 Paint edge lines establishing a 12 foot wide driving lane. Painting edge lines
helps restrict cars to their lanes and causes them to drive slower (this
recommendation was already completed because Decorah Lane was being
resurfaced and restriped this summer).
5. The Police will more closely monitor the traffic at the intersection and record
the speed for further analysis.
6. Other traffic calming considerations we felt were either in place or
inappropriate. I have attached the list of 25 considerations as determined by the
North Central Section - Institute of Transportation Engineers.
We drove through the curve several times ourselves and parked in the lot and watched many
other cars drive the curve. We were convinced that there is not a serious safety problem. We
feel that if all of the above suggestions are followed the Decorah/Ocala intersection is and will
CC
continue to be a safe one.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review the Decorah/Ocala intersection and make recommendations to the City Council
on traffic calming.
Paz No.
Auvust 1, 2000
Q. Adoption of Resolution No. 00-60, "A RESOLUTION
DESIGNATNG THE CIT'�"S OFFICIAL
REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES ON THE
METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT
COUNCIL".
h. Adoption of Resolution No. 00-b 1, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR SIGNAL
NSTALLATION (PILOT KNOB ROAD AND TRUNK
HIGHWAY IJ)."
i. Approval of a cigarette license for the Mendota Heights Amoco.
j. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated August 1, 2000.
k. Approval of the List of Claims dated August 1, 2000 and totaling
S61? 3d9.49.
Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Aves: J
Nays: 0
SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Council acknowledged a memo from Engineer \•Iarc iVlogan
regarding the 2000 Slurry Seal Project,
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council and the audience
on the streets that will receive slurry sealing this summer.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to authorize advzrtisement for
bids for the 2000 Slum Seal Project.
Councilmember Huber seconded the motion.
Nacs:O
DECO
RaH L.-��E STOP Council acknowledeed a memo from Police Chief Johnson rep*arding
S[G\ the stop signs at Decorah Lanz and Ocala Lane. Council also
acknowledged associated historical information.
Police Chief Johnson 2a %e Council and the a.,�..,.�. a brie: hiswrti.
He stated that �ti'hen the stop signs �cere authorized. s.afi noted that
installing the signs ma} make ot::er streets kss sae and the t Council
directed staff to monitor the situstion. The pat-, i ofnce-s used
marked and unmar:,ed squads to monitor traftic 'c _..een yla. 1 and
ht1% 17 and recorded their obser: ations. Ot the ='S, .ei:ic[es
obseraed_c the
m: nd fi% e dro, e
Page �o.
August ". 2000
summer months. He stated that he originally agreed strongly that
Council should defer to the city's professional staff when the signs
were approved. He feels the same today. The citv's staff is
recommending removal of the Decorah sign and the Police Chief is
concemed about safety because people are ignoring the signs. He
stated that he would support the recommendation to remove the
Decorah sign and Mayor Mertensotto's suggestion that limited
visibility signs be installed.
NIs. Janet Aune, 708 Decorah Lane, stated that residents on Decorah
Lane have been concerned about the safety on Decorah for a long
time. With Decorah running nest to the park and trails; traffic is in .
close proximity to those activities. There are also children who use
Decorah, and speed is a big problem. The curve on Ocala makes it
very unsafe. People often exceed the speed limit on the curve,
creating a hazard for pedestrians. Four to five years ago, there were
wo accidents in front of her house in two weeks. She stated that she
lives across the street from the hockey rink. She felt -that the curve is
dangerous if people do not stop at Ocala and hopes that the people
who oppose the stop sign will join with the Decorah residents to
keep the park safe. Nis. Aune also read a statement from Mr. Bill
Burke in support of retaining the stop signs for safety -
Mr. Tim Baumgartner, 685 Ocala Lane, stated that the reason he
thinks the police department has not seen many children crossing the
intersection is because the children in the area are very young and
are accompanied by their parents. They will be growing up and
crossing on their own. There is no good wav to cross the street. He
supported keeping the stop signs for safety of the children and stated
that there are several tall trees near the intersection and someone
cannot see from Ocala until he is half way through the intersection.
He felt that the intersection would be unsafe at 20 miles per hour and
most people drive through it at 00. Traffic goes cer}fast through the
intersection and there is no safe place to cross.
Mawr Nlenensouo stated that a thirtn foot setback is %er'� close to a
residential street and that most people recognize that one ne%er
kno«s %then a child could dari out onto the street. He stated that he
deplores that speed in the ci[%'s residential districts. the %ray
alon_ Decorah the homes are %ery close to the s'tre.t_ and for that
reason Council restricted parking on one side of tit. street. People:
must be conscious that children mad be runnim_ out onto the street
after a ball. for example. but that does not soi e iLe oroM.:n. There
is no pedwn� on the north side of Decorah. and it nr_r. help to install
a pedestrian walkwav on the other side with a r•.:I=::. cross��ail .
Pave No. 6
August 1, 2000
Cheyenne since the stop signs were installed. In the last three to five
years there have been accidents at the intersection of Cheyenne and
Apache. Many studies have been done, and people must realize that
traffic control manual was put together after much study and
thought. The City of St. Paul initiated a program 20 years ago to
install stop signs every two blocks. That was done on residential
streets but not on collector streets. The city now has requests to
install four way stops because no one was stopping at intersections
that were signed. The situation on Decorah has been made worse by
the stop sign. A driver is supposed to stop at a stop sign but they do
not and that is making the situation worse. Children anticipate that
people will stop for a stop sign.
Mayor Nlertensotto pointed out that the slop sign was installed for
safety purposes and for children crossing.
NIr. Niaczko responded that he understands the safety issue and also
understands this is an emotional issue, but a stop sign is not intended
to be a speed control device. Instilling in children that there is a stop
sign and people will stop is not safe. Children need to be taught how
to properly cross streets by looking and listening. In this case he did
not believe the stop signs will have a positive effect and may in fact
make it worse. The State of Minnesota says that streets cannot be
signed less than 30 mph except in a school zone. Speed studies have
been done in this area. People aren't really violating the speed limit.
but 30 mph is too fast. The state law requires that vehicles to yield
to pedestrians whether a crosswalk is painted or not. If a crosswalk
is painted here. they should be painted all over to be consistent.
Nothing is a substitute for good enforcement. The stop sign was
conditionally installed to determine if it would work. Decorah at
Ocala is not a good place to cross_ He suggested that installing a
blind intersection sign would be more appropriate.
Mayor Mertensotto agreed that spied on Decorah from Dodd is the
problem. but the cit} eannoi police it all the time. People in the
neighborhood must be cautious as they drive. Council discussed
painting a crossv�alk so that children could be gi%e❑ a safer place to
cross.
�lr. John Campbell-2 l Apache Court, stated that he belie%'es a
crosswalk in that location «ould be horrible. There is a path along
Friendly Hills park that comes out naturally on the south side of
Decorah. People talk about the speed on Decorah. but stop signs are
nappropriate for controlling speed. Traffic calminc is much more
appropriate. 1f Council wants to solve the proble.n on Decorah- then
Pace N o. 3
August 1. 2000
The only other option is to allow parkin_ on the curve to restrict
people and make them slow down. Something needs to be done on
Decorah. The streer task force wanted it narrower.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the city constructed the street
as narrow as it could be.
Nlr. Blake stated that there is a stop sign by the first comer and the
cars slow down, but within two houses they are up to 40 mph.
Something needs to be done before someone sets killed. He
suggested a "slow curve" sign and enforcing the speed. He stated
that he drives Decorah at 20 mph and people ride his bumper and
pass him. Perhaps a flyer should be sent out to adjoining neighbors
to tell them the police are monitoring speeds and will enforce the
limit.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she would like to take the
police chief s recommendation and also that the city closely monitor
the intersection over the ne:ct five months and really invest some
time and resources to monitor and enforce the speed limit. She
further stated that something must be done to reduce speed. She felt
Council should look at what else can be done to signal to people that
they are coming into a residential neighborhood. She stated that she
would like the issue revisited in five months for speed, safety issues,
and what the city can do. She felt that the city could support moving
the trees from the property at the intersection, where the berm and
the evergreen reduce visibility. Council should also look at what can
be done to calm traffic.
Mavor Mertensotto stated that the city should install appropriate
traffic signs within 120 feet of the intersection mar'.ked limited
visibility ahead. Also, there should be a pedestrian crossing to alert
drivers who are not from the neighborhood.
ivliichell 'V ittenberg. 687 Ocala. stated that there is no doubt there is
a saEen issue. IEstop signs are not appropriate. people will ignore
blind intersection sisrs_ The suggestion someone made to reduce the
speed at the curve to I mph is excellent. There are a number of car
hat do not do a complete stop. but in the months the stop sign has
been pisced. it has ::ever been safer.
�Ir. k[acz:o stntad that there is a need to raise a..a....ess that tI-sere
are pedestrians cross�m� t� ere. Une of the thins t.,�: ma�work here
s painting a cross"aik and installing a velloo: a.. _ men pedestrian
crossing sign.
Paae No. 10
August 1. 2000
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that her support of the motion was
based on Council's directing the commissions to review and make a
recommendation on a plan to calm traffic, such a landscaping and
signage about entering a residential neighborhood at both ends of
Decorah because of the unique problems on Decorah.
Mr. Maczko responded that he is a resident on Cheverme and that
Cheyenne should be addressed also in terms of the impact.
Something done on Decorah would have an impact on Cheyenne.
Councilmember Huber stated that when Council directs staff to
review something and come back with a recommendation. Council
takes some action. He does not recall that Council has committed to
spending any money in the past without knowing what staff
recommends. It has been this Council's history that when Council
recognizes there is an issue that needs to be addressed, Council
always looks at all of the issues and the pros and cons. He would
prefer to direct staff to work as appropriate, including the
commissions if need be, and to come back with a recommendation or
a series of options. He would rather direct staff to keep looking at
the issue rather than committing Council to spending money.
Council is in the budget process now and if something is not set
aside, the issue cannot be addressed until next summer. Council
must be aware that whatever is done may impact city resources. _
Nlavor Nlertensotto stated that the commissions and staff should
know that if something is going to be done by narrowing. etc., it is
not being done for beautification and they should come up with a
standard recommendation that can be employed universally in the
city.
Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the goal is to use other means
to slow traffic other than signage.
Councilmember Krebsbach moved to direct staff to «ork with the
Parks and Recreation and Planning Commissions io corm up with a
plan for calming the traffic at Ocala and Decorah as a first priority
and that standard could also be applied to other areas in the city
where there is concern about speed and pedestrian crossings, with
he intent that a contingency be set aside in NO1.
\la%or lertensotto seconded the motion.
neighborhood did not provide their input to the City Council and that people are diverting
to other neighborhood streets to avoid the stop signs on Decorah Lane. The Council
reiterated that the matter would be reviewed in August.
DISCUSSIOti
The recommendation to place a 3-way stop at the intersection of Decorah Lane and Ocala
Lane was not done to reduce the speed of vehicles. Stop signs should be utilized to
control the flow of traffic, not the speed of traffic. The recommendation for the stop signs
was based upon a sight line restriction for drivers that are proceeding southbound on
Ocala.
Throughout the course of the spring and summer months officers of the Mendota Heights
Police Department randomly monitored the traffic at this intersection utilizing both
marked and unmarked squad cars, while engaged in both stationary and moving patrol.
This took place at all hours of the day.
On twelve days, between May I" and July 17 f , officers were asked to record their
observations. Of the 282 vehicles observed, 22 rolled through the eastbound or
westbound stop signs on Decorah Lane and five drove through without slowing. In all,
17% of the vehicles recorded did not come to a complete stop at the stop signs.
Officers have reported that when stopping motorists some have expressed their opinion
that the stop signs are not warranted. Officers report that it appears that most motorists
are not avoidinz this intersection due to the stop signs but that clearly some are, as traffic
does appear to have increased on Cheyenne.
I have received several letters and telephone calls from residents stating that they believe
the stop signs should be removed. Most state their reason as simply, "They are not
needed... too many stop signs."
RECO�I�IENDATION
There is not a history of accidents at the intersection of Ocala Lane and Decorah Lane.
Accident statistics do not indicate that this is a dangerous intersection; but there is a sight
line concem to the east. An all -way stop does make the intersection safer if people stop at
the stop signs. A random sample obseraation of vehicles showed that 1 7° o of those
observed did not o'oey the stop suns on Decorah Lane. which males this mtersecuon less
sale %Oren motorists and Pedestrians on Ocala Lane expect Them to do so.
Decorah Lag: is a collector street and is designed to handle a lar_er volume of tra:c
than Cheese^�:e. If traffic is being displaced onto Cheyenne then an effoiT to address one
concem ma% ha% e created another on a street that is not designed as a coltecter.
ACTION REQUIRED
Residents will be in attendance at the August 1st Council Meeting who wish to provide
nout on both sides of this issue. After receiving input, the Council should direct staff as
to what action to take.
If the Council decides to remove the eastbound and westbound stop suns on Decorah
Lane at Ocala Lane, the Council should adopt the attached Ordinance No. "An
Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 113."
Attachments:
Diagram of intersection
Correspondence dated September 24, 1999: Wittenberg requesting stop signs
First page of petition: Requesting placement of stop signs
Staff Memo for the November 2, 1999 Council Meeting recommending stop signs
Council Minutes: November 2, 1999 discussing stop signs/tabling until Chief present
Council Minutes: November 16, 1999 discussing stop signs/authorizing installation
Correspondence dated November 17, 1999: Wittenberg
Correspondence dated February 23, 2000: Campbell (to Police Chief)
Correspondence dated February 24, 2000: Reply to Campbell (from Police Chief)
Correspondence dated February'.)"), 2000: Campbell (to Public Works Director)
Correspondence dated February 23, 2000: Reply to Campbell (from Public R'rks Dir)
Correspondence dated March 14. 2000: Baier requesting removal of stoo suns
Correspondence: Godes requesting removal of stop suns refers to petition
First page of petition dated February 27, 2000 requesting removal of stop signs
Council Minutes March 21, 2000 accepting petition and discussing stop suns
Correspondence dated April 27, 2000: Breher requesting removal of stop signs
Stop Sign Request for N E
m
Decorah Land and Ocala Lane s j
200 0 200 400 Fit Gty Of
9/30/99 Nkz�ndota Heights
"jat t
-11
'"Ga�R _41,
,It�.% Is`_ r
at
17
3 moo, at
,
Ate
ti �` �U �Z�`
.-
Ft
�.MLI
L�\s:
le
00
Three Way Stop
G.:
---._ - -
n
- F171
"
-- _
6ST De,onin l .e
Sc^ mber2 iS
Jim Danielson. D rzcwr of rauiic Wor
City of Mendota Heights
City Hall
1161 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heighu_ NCN� » 113
Dear \-Lr. Danielson_
I wanted to than_•c you again for your prompt at zntion and action following nv recent
phone coot ct with Police Chief Johnson. As you are aware, I have had numerous
conversations with Chief Johnson and other ofncer over the past seve al years apout nv
concerns. and r osc of nv neighbors, related to s:gat-tine and speed problems along
Decorah L ne near the into section with Ocala Lane across from Friendly Hills Pa-ri One
need only send seve al anxious minutes at this location to understand my fe` . Cars
speed by we'll in excess of the posted 30 mph linii_ and given the relatively sha-o ct-:ve on
Decorah bepvzen tiashua and Ocala. it is vinzly i,upossbtz to see oncor. ing Yves•oound
t:raF11c from the north side of Decorah. I cannot tell you how nano tines I have vvt�:essed
near -accidents invoIYing cars pulling out of Ocala onto Decorah, almost been rear -ended by
speeders as I've pulled into my drivevvav (or hit by cars IIaveling too fast as I pull out of
my driveway).d perhaps most imporandy, how of zn I have seen cars need io bP ie
suddzniv or veer to avoid unsuspzcnng children and their fz-uIzs as they cross Decorh
O
L
heading towards the pa:'.c. erroneously believin_ t.it was Safe to do so. There is a tmglc
accident wiring -to happen here, and I am only glad that none has occurred to daie-
We hati'e c sc!sszd szvz l potential solutions to my concens. I: appears [`:a .. C;ng
tie 30 -ph =enz is rculi as speed limits are rtaLL zd by the s ster and wh ie th. police
el to s pep r r=d patrols of the area. Lis does not heap provide along-tz.—
` I o °revers, it gems io ne that there isrI vya io
solution to =%;n the rzignboraced s zr.
solve th_ let ^r,d I'r zcaullt; submit the idea of piacang three-way stop• gr.� a.
pros s - .
e Deco Oc a inierseceor, (with a pedesc an cross:eal'.< acro_� Decorah?). Sec:. a 11
ply:
h from Oc a'e, . _•: iv2 to cross to a:a iron
would io nt )hce onto Decora r
pJ',;,.._ io nnra_enble levels
par:raffci
< r
s- i zlp s;o: ;c in t,
L. �1. - -
Le ,., .:_ fCi tSlot�CiS.
T .._... _ .. ;•c rd tF: Cit% Cc:;
_ e r:c,r _ _1 -
_ . e -
Cv" t oec �e auuut the si�hc-line znd ; e= prouie ::s on Decor Ise a. -oss
i roC'il Fr;ecdIv r��iIs Pari<. Ord aiso request naat inre_-.gay scoo si uns biz!erected _t i=.�
nte.;ection ei DecOr.:h and Ocaia Lanes:
Narne (Please Prjnt)
si
U�c
Address
Giirl—JifL�lLri(
N. ,e (Please Fin:)
lit
Si�atnre �-
Address
Post-W Fax Note
7671
(cafeIFeses�
From
CITY OF NIL` L A
TO: Nta%or. Cir. Council and Cic: Admklao
'-
PROM: Scot A. Johnson. Chief of Police 5
REF: Consideration of Stop Siens: Decorah Lane at Ocala Lay
1t
DISCUSSIO\ X
v�,kL
City.' sta=� has been contzctzd by ti1r. ivti[chell tivirtznberg of 687 Decorah Lane who has
exorreSsed concern for the safety of pedestrians and motorists [sing the intersection of
L
Ocala Lane and Decorah Laze. over the tours: of the summer ouiczrs have pzrodicaliv
set un ra az on Decorah Lane. The results indicate that most mo[orists are ocevina [he
speed limit; however, an occasional violator has been noted. We have had nor _nt
motor vehicle accidents on Decorah Lane.
T hzre is presently' a yield sign for traffic travelling southbound on Oca1.a Lzn_z at Decorah
Lane. Public Works Director Jim Danielson and I have examined this intersection and
noted that there is a sight line concern. Trafnc entering Decorah Lane from Ocala Lane
L 4
has limited visibility to the east. Visibility is restricted due to t_ie curve in the road%%a% on
Decorah east of Ocala as well as the vegetation in the yard located in the noaheas coiner
of Ocala Lane and Decorah. This vegetation is riot on cin rigght-of-way.
It should a.so bz noted tha: pede-trians, including children, r:ho mug cross Dece:a_- La...
o access Fcz c H;Ps Pai a and the pedestrian trail ca s:ate-:. use [his int o-:.
\Ire �''iaenbz-= has presented ciiv staff"ith a pe[ition signed by 27 resident :ho
.sidine i,. (hie c. of this intcrsecdon reauesiinJ the Cii Council consider .�_: oe
oPa the._-.. o he in. on of Decorah L ne and Orla Lane.
c:.
_ __.._
L..::
CITY COUNCIL vIEETIPiG MINUTES
RE: STOP SIGNS
November 2, 1999
Page No. 16
November 2, 1999
Councilmember Dwyer stated that he is familiar with this area, and
that the intersection gets quite a bit of use. He had several concerns
about the request. If a stop sign is installed, there is less than 2/10ths
of a mile where there is another stop sign. That would be chopping
up the road quite a bit. Because of that, he felt that people might
elect to avoid Decorah and start traveling on Cheyenne and up to the
four-way stop. He noted that 27 residents signed the petition, and
asked Mr. Wittenberg how many people are opposed.
NSr. Wittenberg responded that all of the immediate neighbors are in
agreement that this is a concern_ The intersection is across from the
park, and there are a lot of kids crossing to the park.
Councilmember Huber stated that as a matter of practice, a good
practice, Council turns requests for traffic signs over to the Police
Chief for an assessment of the intersection and a recommendation.
He informed ivir. Wittenberg that requests for stop signs are taken
out of the political arena and are turned over to the experts for a
recommendation.
Councilmember Schneeman stated that the memo to Council was
prepared by Chief Johnson. She asked if he and other city staff
members recommended the three wav stop.
Vtr. Wittenberg responded that Chief Johnson and Public Works
Director Danielson were in agreement that a three way stop is
needed because of the sight lines.
Councilmember Dwyer stated that he has a bad feeling about the
recommendation. He further stated that it does not seem logical to
have stop signs so close together. He noted that there is a city park
across the street and the city could install a street light.
Mayor Mertensotto staled that unless there is something to alert
people to the sign, people aho are nut familiar with the intersection
will go through it_ He felt that perhaps a pedestrian crossing should
be marked on the street instead.
Councilmemher Sehneeman poinied out that theree is a % i"d s non
Ocala now.
CITY COUNCIL 1VIEETING I�LINUTES
RE: STOP SIGNS
November 16, 1999
Page No. 8
November 16, 1999
Councilmember Dwyer pointed out that there is a stop sign at Huber
and Decorah. If this request approved, there would be three stops in
less than one-third mile. From Huber to the proposed stop sign is
less than one -tenth mile. He felt that it would possible that people
will take Cheyenne rather than Decorah to avoid all of the stop signs.
He asked whether a compromise would be to replace the yield sign
with a stop sign on Ocala.
Chief Johnson responded that most people azz stopping on Ocala
noW. and he would definitely change the yield sign to a stop sign.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked how faz back tries are supposed to
be from a comer.
Public Works Director Danielson responded that there is a sight
distance triangle on comer lots and there are not supposed to be any
sight obstructions thirty feet from the comers.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the city be interested in
participating in helping the home owner move the tree closer to the
house.
The property owner, present for the discussion, stated that there is
nowhere to move it to.
Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that he has asked
NSP for a quote for a street light at the intersection but has not
received a response yet.
viayor Mertensotto suggested marking a pedestrian crossing in
addition to the street light and stop sign. He stated that going east on
Decorah, people will not expect a stop sign at the intersection.
�4rs. 'b"itrenberg stated that people turning from Ocala cannot see
until they are already on Decorah.
Councilmember hrebsbach staled that no matte; there is a
� isbility issue. �chich reail� is a safety issue.
ytacor j%lertensotto tell that lights are �imll%imporan[ at the
intersection so that people can see the step si«n_ as .: ell as a
cross«alk. He %could support the stop signs it i;_l:iin and t :z
crosswalk are installed.
Correspondence dated November 11, 1999
Wittenberg
John M. Campbell
2348 Apache Court
Mendota Heights, MN 5j 120-1634
23 FebruaR". 3001)
Scott A. Jo'nnson
Chief of Police
City of Mendota Heights
Multiway STOP signs at Ocala Lane and Decorah Lane
Dear Chief Johnson,
We have had several conversations concerning the justification for the installation of the
Multiway STOP signs at Ocala Lane and Decorah Lane. You have been courteous and candid
with me and I auoreciate that. I have read your Memorandum (October li, 1999) which you
addressed to the Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator. It is my understanding from our
conversations and your Memo that, other than for an occasional violator, you have not found a
speeding problem on Decorah. I also understand that there have been no recent motor vehicle
accidents on Decorah Lane. Again, from out conversations and your Memo, I understand the
only two reasons you feel that a multiway STOP sign installation at this intersection could be
jusufied is a possible sight -line problem and the proximity to Friendly Hills Park.
This leaves me with more questions than I have answers. So that I can fully understand your
reasons please be kind enough to provide me with any Traffic Engineering studies that were done.
Also, please include copies of your notes, measurements taken, and computations you made that
helped you decide that placing stop signs on Decorah Lane was warranted. In addition, how
many times, in the past three years, have you sent one of your Police Officers to monitor an
alleged speeding problem on Decorah Lane at the requestof Mr. Wittenberg or ethers. I believe
you told me that you did speed studies twice last year. I also know that, from driving on Decorah
Lane, you had a 'Speed Trailer' brought out and set up near the tennis courts. It is my
undersandima that these studies never showed a speeding problem.
I have lived in this area for the pas fifreen years and do not ever recall an accident at Ocala Lane
and Decorah Lane. Has there ever been one at this lecation? Has there ever been an iniur'.to
anyone at this intersection° Finally, how many traffic accidents or injuries has here been
anywhere on Decorah Lane, between Huber Drive and Dodd Road in the past ten %ears°
lour tin;ei% %%-rizten response to my inquiry will be very much appreciated.
John N1 Campbell
CC C;_% A.-'mtnistraor
John :II_ Campbell
Z;-13 Apache Court
Mendota Heights, Nf\' >5120-1634
'_3 Fzbruan. 3UU0
Jim Danielsen
Public Works Director
Ciry of Mendota Heights
Lighted Pedestrian Crossing at Ocala Lane and Decorah Lane
Dear Mr. Danielson, -
I have read your Memo (December 15, l g9) that was sent to the Mayor, City Council, and City
Administrator concerning the proposed lighting at Decorah Lane and Ocala Lane. I find that I
still have a few questions related to that project. To help me understand the full impact of this
project, please provide written answers to the following questions:
• In vour Memo you state that the City could get MSA funding for the light. Please explain
how that would wor',c_ Is there an approval process or does the City just makes a
recommendation and then some agency pays'
• How many pedestrian crossings are therein Mendota Heights and how many are lighted'.
• Because the perceived benefit of installing this light will be for a few people, will those
people pav for the upkeep and maintenance of this light if it is installed or will all of Mendota
Heights be expected to pay out of general maintenance funds.
• Who will pay for the electricity that this light will use year in and year out' Will it be the
people in the immediate area of the light or will we all pay'
• There is a sated policy of no streetlights n Nlendota Heights. Doesn't this proposed light
conflict with that policy''.
• installing lights at all pedestrian crossings°
Is Mendota Heights planning on
• Did anyone consider placing a pedestrian crossing one block up at the comer of Pueblo Lane
and Decorah Lane near the hockey rink where there are no perceived sight -line problems and
there is enough ambient light that an additional light would not be necessary°
• e residents that will be affected by the glare ofthis light
Finally, have you contacted any of th
burning all night°
Your timel% rzsponse to my inquiry will be very" much 3oo2ciated
Sincerer.
IA �� �
_ :t
_ John ir1. Campbell
23?8 Apache Court
l�Sendota HeiShts, itii�i 55120-1634
Dear Mr. Campbell:
Please find below my responses to the eight written questions in your February 23, 2000 letter.
1. In your memo you state than the Ciry could get eLiS? funding for the li; ht. Please
ezplain how than would work. Is there an approval proczss or does the Ciry just make a
recommendarion and then some a;ency Pays:'
l�1SA is the acronym for tilunicipal Sate Aid. Decorah Lane is an itiiSA street; and
street lights are an eligible expense for funding by MSA. In order for i�SSA �!nding to be
used, the City would prepare a fcrmal request, MSA staff members would review it for
compliance with their standards and if it meets them, provide the fuudin_.
?. How marrj pedestrian crossings are there in tLiendota Heights andnow many are
lighted?
These are 35 pedestrian crossings in :ilendota Heiah[s 1S are lighted.
3. Bzcause the perceived benejrt of installing this light roa'i11 be for a fz�,v people, ',4'ill those
people pc, for the t�D:-eep end maintenance of this light i{ it is installed or tiuz?1 all of i>nendata
Heights be eroecred to pay out of general maintenance finds?
S[reet lights ins[alled on collector streeis for safety reasons are ftr.i ed out of t:;z Ci[v's
general itnd. Decorah Lane is a collector s[ree[ and [he lint is being [ns[alle� for safety
P1S0 C:�.
r -� ,
— j�•%_o i:�il! p��' for rh.e electricity d[nt tuts light �:%!1 u�� �'e �, to erg'_ _•�e::r oa; ? ti'vi?l it e
rite reo i� ir: rile in;n:ediate area of rile I; .,lit cr i�:i?? r.�e a%:` pa.•: '
St.�et i��h [s ins:allee on coliecror streeis for safety rcisons a-e h_r.ce: cc[ of t:�z
�e�e......�:d.
;-
]l0i \� � :� Ct ,�
Correspondence Dated March 14, 2000
Baier Requesting Removal of Stop Sims
Correspondence
Godes Requesting Removal of Stop Suns
Refers to Petition
First Page of Petition Dated February 27, 2000
Requesting Removal of Stop Signs
Page No. 6
March 21. 2000
Mayor ivlertensotto responded that Council received a petition for
the stop sign and it was discussed at two council meetings with no
opposition expressed. The petitioners for the sign were very
nstrumental in aettina something done, and it was not until after the
signs were installed that the city began receiving feedback. That is
why Council scheduled reconsideration for August 1. He informed
vis, Baler that Council hopes that sufficient information gets out the
neighborhood about the August meeting so that Council can listen to
both sides. There will be press releases to notify the residents prior
to the meeting.
Councilmember Dwyer stated that he travels through the intersection
and will bring his experience to the Council table when the issue is
reconsidered. He pointed out that the sign has been defaced and
people are not honoring it.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that one of the concerns of the first
petition was the number of children crossing Decorah to get to the
park. Council has asked the police department to monitor the
situation and see if this is a place where children really do cross.
The crosswalk has not yet been painted; and the proposed street light
has not been installed yet because of weather conditions. He stated
that those items can be delayed until after the August 1 discussion.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the people tivho signed the
petition drive Decorah regularly.
ivSs. Baler responded that they do. She stated that Decorah is a
collector street and people are diverting themsehzs to other routes in
the neighborhood since the sign was installed. which is one of her
concerns.
Councilmember Krebsbach asked iVls. Baler if she has any idea how'
many people who signed the petition did so because then are
opposed to stop signs and street lights as a matter of principle.
yls. Baler responded that she would not be sunrised it some People
signed because they do
not want lights.
She slated that
she k�:o�cs
the level ofpedestrians
on a daily basis.
and [ha. she thinks
['r:e
location is not
be best location
for strew lights. She also
proposed
felt that there are many
intersections that
ha%C a more dire
need for
stop signs.
lavor Mertensotto responded that the cite has a scree_ light
ordinance and if people wan[ [hetn. Council can a[[^,prize [hem. His
Correspondence Dated Apri1273 2000
Breher Requesting Removal of Stop Signs
September 1 1,2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Parks Five Year (200"I-2005) Capital Improvement Plan
Background:
The Commission tabled development of a Capital Improvement
Plan until future funding options to supplement the existing Special
Park Fund had been determined. The City Council has directed that
revenue from Cell Phone Company's rental of space on the City Water
Tower would be directed to the Special Park Fund for the next three
years. This amounts to approximately $60,000.00 per year.
The following data summarizes existing park facilities needs and
conditions. Also included are past proposals for various park
improvements or upgrades.
City Council requests the Commission prepare a current Five Year
Plan that addresses the replacement of aging timber play equipment in
several parks.
The following information is grouped by use or function rather
than by park location.
Function / headings are: - Warming Houses
Ice Rinks
Play Equipment
- Trails
- Ball fields
Long Range Park Planning
Amenities, etc.
WARMING HOUSES:
1. Marie Park -Built in 1970-16'x28'=448 SgFt
-2 Metal Doors -Gas Space Heater
-No Windows -Painted in 1999
-Current condition... FAIR
-Replacement cost: 448 sq.ft.x $40 = $18,000
Needs: a. Re -grade around building. $ 1,000
b. Replace two metal doors @ $600 ea $ 11200
c. ADA upgrades: ramps, handrails, paved
path from parking area $ 51000
d. Outside benches-4 @ $200 $ 800
e. Exterior lighting $ 11000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: b. @ $1,200
2. Friendly Hills Park -Built in 1970-16'x28'=448 sq ft
-2 Metal Doors -Gas space heater
-No windows -Painted in 1999
-ADA ramp to doors added in 1998
-New siding installed in 1998
-Current condition: Good to Fair
-Replacement cost 448 x $40 = $18,000
Needs: a. ADA: path, hand rails from house to rinks $ 6,000
b. Replace two metal doors @ $600 ea $ 11200
c. Exterior lighting $ 11000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: b. @ S 1,200
3. Wentworth Park -Built pre-1970-14'x18' = 252 sq ft
-2 Metal Doors -Gas Space heater
-No windows -Painted in 1999
-Current condition: Fair to Good (Cramped)
-Replacement cost: $18 to $40,000
Needs: a. Larger building. (1) Enlarge to 28'x18' @ $10,000
(2) Move house from Ivy Park @ $6,000 (3) Build
new 500 sq ft @ $20,000 or more.
b. ADA: paved path to rinks, hand rails $ 6,000
c. Exterior lighting $ 1,000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE
Users have requested larger building.
4. Ivy Park — Not in
use.
Identical
in age and size as those located in
Marie
and
Friendly Hills
Parks.
ICE RINKS:
1. Marie Park -Small free skating area w/1 light pole
-Hockey rink developed pre-1970
-6 Existing light poles, pre-1970
-Current condition: Very Poor. Boards
and support posts require replacement
-Cost to replace boards: $1 1,000.00
-Current condition of lighting system is
poor: Replacement cost $12,000.00-
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
Rink is usable but requires continuous replacement of boards and
posts, which is a very difficult task. Posts are out of plumb and
alignment due to frost heaves. Complete removal and replacement
of posts and boards should occur within the near future. Existing
light poles are leaning. Light fixtures are dated and inefficient.
2. Friendly Hills -Largest free skating rink w/ 2 light poles
-Hockey boards replaced in 1998
-Hockey rink paved with bituminous in 1998
-6 light poles cover hockey rink. Poles and
light fixtures are dated and inefficient.
-Current condition: Good to excellent
-Cost to replace lighting system: $121000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
3. Wentworth -Medium size free skating rink w/ 2 light poles
Hockey boards replaced in 1997
-6 light poles cover hockey rink. Poles and light
fixtures are dated and inefficient.
-Current condition: Good to Excellent
-Cost to replace lighting system: $121000
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
4. Ivy Hills Park -Hockey boards removed in 1993
-Free skating rink removed in 1996
-Warming house still in place. Options are
to move to Wentworth Park or demolish.
-Skating discontinued due to lack of use and
poor soil conditions that resulted in unsafe
and inconsistent ice conditions.
5. Future Skating Possibilities:
The City Council is currently considering the skating arena
proposal presented by St. Thomas Academy. Council members have
reported positive interest in this idea from many residents. If the City
does participate in such an arena, opportunities may exist for "free
skating" time for residents or youth teams that could reduce the need
for City skating facilities currently provided.
PLAY EQUIPMENT:
Note: 1. Play equipment installed must include solid surfacing, play
elements and access points to accommodate ADA requirements. The
solid surfacing adds approximately 10% to 15% to the cost and
installation of new equipment.
2. Equipment installed in 1990 averaged $17,500 per park. At
today's prices that would be approximately $27,000 which includes
the solid surface areas to meet ADA guidelines.
3. The older timber structures to be removed include an
attached swing(s). Current safety guidelines do not allow swings to be
attached to platform/play structures. The swings must be freestanding
with fall/safety areas surrounding the swing unit(s). When the existing
timber to is removed and replaced with equipment that
meets the current guidelines the border area must be enlarged to
accommodate a new double swing unit(s).
1. Ivy Park -New Equipment installed in 1990
-Current condition: Good
Improvement required to maintain current level of service: NONE.
If no changes or improvements are made to this park it is not
necessary to make immediate ADA upgrades. ADA upgrades would
include installation of a solid surface path from the timber border to the
play equipment, a transfer point platform and additional play
components. Approximate cost: $7,000 to $10,0000
2. Wentworth -1970 Timber unit modified in 1990-this unit
does not meet current C.P.Safety Guidelines
-New equipment installed in 1990
-In 1995 additional swings & play components
plus resilient surfacing added. Meets ADA.
-Current condition: Good to Excellent
Removal of 1970 timber components can be done at any time with
little impact on current level of service. Most of these play elements are
redundant. Area left open due to removal can be used for new
components suitable for two to five year olds and be installed on
resilient surfacing.
-Removal cost or timber unit: $1,000
-New play structure for tots : $10 to $14,000
-Existing border area adequate for new equip.
3. Valley Park -1970 Timber unit modified in 1990-does not
meet current C.P. Safety Guidelines
-New equipment added in 1990
-Current condition: Adequate —Removal of
timber units and replacement equipment
should be a high priority
-This play area is in a constricted area due to creek, parking lot and
mature trees. Expansion of timber border area is limited. Due to these
restrictions any new components should come from previous supplier
so that new interchangeable modular units can be installed on existing
support posts.
-Removal cost of timber unit: $1,000
-New play
components: $12
to
$161000
including
resilient surfacing
to
meet ADA
4. Roger's Lake -1970 Timber unit modified in 1990-this unit
does not meet CPS guidelines. Timber border
area for this unit is separate from new
equipment installed in 1990. Removal of the
timber units will not lower level of service -most
play elements are redundant.
-Current level of service: Good
-Removal of timber unit: 51,000
-New play components: $10 to $15,000
including resilient surfacing.
Existing border area adequate.
5. Marie Park -Timber unit replaced in 2000 with "Tiny Tot"
structure plus double swing (4 swings) unit at
a cost of $17,800. Required enlarged timber
border area.
-New equipment installed 1990
-Does not meet ADA. No resilient surfacing to
components. Cost to add access point and
resilient surfacing: $4,000,
-Current condition: Excellent to Good
6. Friendly Hills -1970 Timber units upgraded in 1990
-New equipment installed in 1990
-Current conditions: Fair to Good
Upgrades will require: -Removal of old timber unit @ $1,000
Add resent surfacing and new components
suitable for tots @ $12 to $1510004
-Border timbers may need to be extended -but
existing area is limited by steep slope and
mature trees.
7. Victoria -Highlands -Park developed in 1992. Large border area.
-Equipment is in three separate areas.
-Does not include resilient surfaced areas that
meet ADA guidelines.
-Current condition: Good
Upgrades will require: -Addition of resilient surfacing and new
component modules that meet ADA guidelines. Use of original
equipment supplier would allow easier changeover using existing
support poles. ADA upgrades could all occur at one existing group of
play components. Estimated cost: $7,000 to $10,000,
8. Mendakota -Park developed in 1991. Largest play structure
system. Contains adequate resilient surfaced
area and components. Some components do not
meet current CPS Guidelines.
-Current condition: Good
Upgrades to this park should include removal and replacement of
"spring toys" in pea rock area and addition of "spring toys" in resilient
surfaced area. Replacement of "glide" swing with a Bucket swing
suitable for handicap child is also recommended. Paint touch ups and
general "housekeeping" of area is required. Estimated cost: $7000 to
$9,000,
9. Kensington -Park developed in 1992. Large border area
allows room to add "spring toys".
-Components require paint touchups
-Flexible drain tile should be installed in wet
areas and connected to curb drain
-Resilient surfacing needs repair.
-Current condition: Good
Cost to "spruce up" this play area and add some "spring toys": 55,000
10. Valley View Heights (Curley tot lot)
Timber equipment installed in 1989.
-Consists of timber tower with 2 swing
components attached plus a third free-
standing swing unit.
Timber border edging is too close to play
elements -does not meet CPS Guidelines.
Current condition: Fair to Good
Upgrades to this play area should be removal of swing units attached
to tower. These could be reinstalled in a location with correct safety
zones. Timber border area must be enlarged near third free standing
swing unit and to accommodate re -installed swings. Play components
that meet ADA guidelines with resilient surfacing would also require
enlarged timber border areas and a paved access path (30 to 40 feet)
from existing trail. Estimated cost: $10,000 to $14,000. Remaining
timber structure should be cleaned, wood dressed, and touch up
painting.
11. Hagstrom-King -Park developed in mid-1980's by housing
developer as part of Park Contribution.
-Timber structure is dated some components do
not meet CPS Guidelines. Does not meet ADA
requirements.
Current condition: Fair to Good
Upgrading this play area presents some "special" options. Some of the
existing timber equipment can, with minor modifications, can be kept in
use. Those elements removed that do not meet CPS Guidelines could
be replaced in the same location with an enlarged border area...
OR...
New equipment, with resilient surfacing, could be installed at a new
location or on the existing concrete half -basketball court. Benches and
other amenities could be added to make this a specialized tot play area.
The basketball court could be reinstalled south of the existing location
in an open area that was leveled for a possible tennis court. The only
other full basketball court in now located in Men Dakota Park.
Note: This much of an alteration in the park should be presented to the
neighborhood before proceeding with specific plans.
12. Future Play Areas
The Town Center development at the corner of Dodd and Hwy
110 is -proposing 145 housing units (60 senior & 85 residential).
Several inquiries requesting a park or play area be developed in the area
east of Dodd, north of Hwy 110, west of Delaware, and south of
Wentworth have been discussed during the past ten years. Lack of a
suitable site and cost have been the main factors that have tabled
discussion on these requests. The Town Center project will probably
awaken this issue.
Trails:
1. Expansion /extension of bituminous paved trails.
Extending existing trails, connecting "missing" segments, and
development of new trails has been routinely discussed by the
Commission. Following is a brief description and comments regarding
past trail discussions.
a. Trail along Delaware south of Hwy 110. The City
constructed widened shoulder from Hwy 110 to Huber. Construction of
separated trails must wait until Dakota County upgrades (widens)
Delaware, which is a County Road. At that time they will buy additional
right-of-way thus allowing the installation of a separated path.
b. Victoria Rd. south of Marie at Celia Road. This is a County
Road which has been upgraded by the County this year in preparation
of "turning back" the jurisdiction of this road to Mendota Heights. Once
this is done the City can use State Aid Funds to install storm sewers
along the road, fill in the ditch, and install the missing trail link from
Celia to Celia Rd.
c. Lexington from Mendota Heights Road to Wagon Wheel and
Wagon Wheel from Lexington to Hwy 35E Bridge. These two segments
have been approved by City Council and currently plans are being
prepared for construction. Acquiring easements has slowed the project,
but progress will pick up this fall and construction should occur in
2001.
d. Dakota County has proposed construction of the North
Urban Regional Trail, which will begin in Lilydale and extend to South
St. Paul. In Mendota Heights the trail will go along the existing Valley
Park trail, along Hwy 110 beginning at Dodd, and along the Hwy 110
frontage road to Delaware and into West St. Paul, etc.
The trail segment next to Town Center will be enhanced as a sort
of "gateway" to Town Center. Park Fund contributions from the Town
Center Development may be used to enhance the trail amenities in this
area.
2. Cross County Ski Trails
A beginning trail segment has been planned for Valley Park in the
area north of the parking lot/ball field, which would make a connection
point at Bachelor Avenue and link up to a possible trail on the Par 3
Golf Course. The Council does not want cross-country ski trails to use
existing bituminous trails or bridges in Valley Park. The beginning
segment, estimated to cost $5,000, follows a double loop course
without crossing existing streams in the park. Extending the trail
beyond this area will required culverts or bridges over stream in the
park, which will add to future ski, trail development. The beginning first
cross county ski trail segment has not been approved by City Council.
Ball fields:
1. Softball: There have been no requests for additional softball
fields in the past several years.
2. Baseball: The commission has received requests for the
development of full size baseball field(s). Currently the only City
developed full size field is located at Sibley Park. The City also
constructed two youth size baseball/adult softball fields at Sibley Park.
These fields do not have permanent mounds nor grass infields.
The Mendota Heights Athletic Association has proposed that two
of the four full size softball fields at Mendakota Park be converted to
baseball fields with permanent mounds and grass infields. This proposal
has not been discussed by the Park Commission but this will be on a
future meeting agenda for discussion.
The Commission did consider developing a full size baseball field
at the Friendly Hills Marsh Park (off Apache St), but this proposal was
tabled due to lack of interest and the desire to find a more accessible
site.
Another possible, affordable, site that may become a future
option would be the St. Thomas land south of Mendota Heights Rd.
This has been mentioned in conjunction with the building of an Ice
Arena on the parcel.
3. Soccer Fields
The City currently has four youth overlay fields in neighborhood
parks, a dedicated youth field at Mendakota Park, one large size field at
Sibley Park, and two full size fields at Kensington Park.
There have been no recent requests for the City to construct an
additional soccer field.
1. Park Plans.
The City commissioned the first Parks Plan in 1971.
Recommendations from this study guided the parkland acquisition and
development during the 1970's when the pace of residential
development had increased. In 1985 the City Council hired the firm of
Barton-Aschman to prepare the "1985 Park and Recreation Facility
Needs Study". This study outlined the park needs, which were
presented to residents and finally resulted in the passage of the Parks
Referendum in 1989.
The Commission on several occasions has discussed the value or
need for a Park or City Natural Resource Plan, which serve as a guide
for re-establishment on native plant species to City Park and open
spaces.
A preliminary proposal requesting the City Council to hire a
consultant to prepare DNR grant applications was presented to Council.
Council did not discuss this proposal at the time, requesting additional
information or a funding source other than the Special Park Fund,
Park Amenities /Needs
1. Bleachers for Kensington Soccer Fields
Four bleachers for this park were purchased and placed in the
park in 1993. At some point they were moved to Mendakota Park for a
softball tournament and have remained there since providing seating for
the many games played at this complex. One drawback the park
maintenance crews encountered with the bleachers was weeds and
grass growing where they could not mow. They have requested that if
bleachers are again to be purchased for or moved back to Kensington
Park that concrete pads first be installed. Each concrete pad,
approximately 12' by 25', will cost $1,500, four are required.
Bleachers, three tiered, cost $1,000 each. Total for four locations
would be $10,000.00 if four new bleacher units were purchased.
2. Park Storage Building at Mendakota Park
This is not an amenity, but where else could I include this item.
Parks Leadperson Terry Blum has annually asked that a storage building
be constructed in this park. The idea has not been well received by the
City Council nor has it been fully discussed by the Council. One new
thought is that the Fire Department is requesting the Council fund
construction of a storage / training building on the Fire Hall site in
2002. If this idea is approved by the Council, perhaps the Park
Commission could ask that space for use by the parks maintenance
crew be provided in this building.
3. Safety Netting over Hub area in Mendakota Park
Safety netting was recommended by the Commission in 1994 to
the City Council and was soundly rejected. The Commission
recommended it a second time and again was rebuffed. In 1995 the
Council decided to extend the height of the backstop to prevent foul
tipped balls from hitting people on the Hub building second level.
Recently, on several occasions various Council members have stated
that netting over the Hub area should be installed to protect spectators
from foul balls. Cost for this installation is approximately $25 to
$ 30, 000.
4. Security devices for restrooms in Kensington and Mendakota
Acts of vandalism to the restrooms at these two parks has
occurred several times each year for the past three years. These
senseless acts "call out" for some way to prevent them or catch the
individuals responsible. Other cities are also experiencing the same type
of damage and some have installed alarms, cameras, time locks, etc.
If the Commission desires to try some of these methods they should
establish a budget and direct staff to research and suggest what
method should be employed.
5. Pumps in City ponds to "clean water"
Installing pumps in City ponds to disperse duckweed and algae
growth is a suggestion offered to staff numerous times each summer.
The pumps do not clean the water only disperses the growth to the
edges leaving the center water clear. Installation costs run in the $5 to
$10,000 per pump and electric consumption can be several thousand
per year per pump. There are about five ponds most cited by callers. If
we do one, we will have to do them all.
6. Pedestrian Bridge in Friendly Hills Park by Tennis Court
This wood bridge has stood well beyond its useful life. The parks
crew would like a culvert installed rather then a replacement bridge so
that they would have a drivable access point to the other side for turf
maintenance. This is a good idea and is less expensive then a bridge.
Estimated cost for this culvert and restoration work: $2,000.00.
Mendota Heights
Parks System
gaic GNer
Lax' tan fl Tswk wa lld
Fri<a NWa
Pu<6b fane fl A the
FliendlY Ma*aLa
a Lane
Wdrtrom xmd
Mendda N<i is Roes Fast d xuW Drive
I HIRa Park
Baler AaensK & Me a Park Driess
Rev on
Stackbrid A Conrwd Wa
Marie Park
Retveen Ydaia & ton
Mmdakola Pah
Dodd Rmd & MesdakoG Dries
Ro m lake
Wa Wheel TnR
BIEI< Rrk
Marie & D<laware Aaemsa
VaVe Pah
N at d i35E on Marie Aa<nve
Victoria HI Mavda
Y lorla & Dou less Rmd
WentworW
Wenlxwth Aamsn
CIYIC CENT'.
BAII iIELD
YICTORiA
xlDxuxxR
a� „
xv�::�
G
flDDEfle IAKE
RDGERS LAKE un
wa..s��
WY HILIS
us.xv9 ti`/
EqE
9
WENTWORTN
YALIEY
SINLET ATHLETIC ,
g n snnr LJ'
r�a.n
sr, x.�
iRiENDLY
MARSN
MENDAKDTA
iRIENOLY HRlS
o
lc`e
Q4 4
¢``y�
a
�o
a
HAGSTRGM�NING
KENSINGTGN
City of Mendota Heights
MEMO
September 11, 2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Special Park Fund
Discussion:
The balance in the Special Park Fund has "historically" been maintained at a
level in excess of $300,000.00. Do to the dwindling increases to the fund from
park contributions from development of single family lots or re -plats in the
Industrial Park the fund has been drawn down below this level. Balance as of
December 31, 1999 was $262,822.00.
The City Council has pledged to direct approximately $60,000.00 for the
next three years to the Special Park Fund. The following is my attempt to project
the fund balance for the next several years.
Balance as of January 1, 2000
$263,000.00
Park dedications during 2000
$
79,000.00
Interest Income in 2000
$
20,000,00
Balance as of December 31, 2000
$362,000.00
2001, 2002, & 2003 Fund Increases
Cell Tower Rent
$
60,000,00
Interest
$
20,000.0O
Fund Increase December 31, 2001
$ 80,000,00
Fund
Increase
December
31,
2002
$
80,000.00
Fund
Increase
December
31,
2003
$
80,000,00
Accumulated total does not include additional dedications....... $602,000.00
Possible dedication from various projects (next 5 yrs):
1`: Town Center —145 residential units x $750.00 = $108,750.00
Town Center — Commercial est. $ 75,000,00
2. End of Pilot Knob Road (Office or Housing) est. $ 75,000.00
3. Infill single family lots 50 x $750 = $ 37,500.00
$296,250.00
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 4, 2000
TO: Park &Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary L. Hapka, Recreation Programmer
SLiBJECT: September Recreation Report
Lebanon Hills Stakeholders Task Force Meefin�
Representatives from the Park & Recreation Departments of Rosemount, Apple Valley, Eagan,
Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights met with Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer & Associates,
Project Manager for the Lebanon Hills Masterplan. The grouped discussed types of recreational
uses residents are currently using Lebanon Hills Park for and which types of recreational uses we
would like to see available to residents in the future. The group consensus was that the group
believed its residents currently use the park for a mix of passive and active recreation such as;
walking, hiking,_ running, picnicking, horseback riding, camping, swimming & cross country
skiing. The group advised Mr. Schoenbauer that it would like to see some type of naturalist
center/interpretive facilities and programming opportunities and more paved & unpaved bike and
walkins/hiking trails.
Skating Director/Instructor Position
The Skating Director/Instructor for the 2000/2001 winter season has been hired. Renee Sorenson
who instructed the Learn to Skate program for several years has accepted.a director positionat an
Olympic training center in Colorado. Rebecca Rehn a West St. Paul resident and junior at the
University of St. Thomas will be taking over the Learn to Skate program. Rebecca has sixteen
years of skating experience and is an elementary education major and enjoys working with
children and parents. The Learn to Skate programs will nm on Sunday afternoons January 7 —
February 10, 2001.
Fall Soccer
The City of Mendota Hziahts successfully accommodated five user groups for the 2000 fall
soccer season. St. Thomas Academy, Visitation, The Mendota Heights Athletic Association, The
Sibley Area Sting and Friendly Hills Middle School all made use of the two soccer fields at
Kensington and one field at Mendakota as well as several neighborhood park soccer fields.
Athletic Directors and coaches at Visitation and Friendly Hills Middle School believe they will
be able to use their home soccer fields for the 2001 soccer season.
Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks 2001
Planning for next years park celebration is underway. Entertainment including; Walton's Hollow
Petting Zoo and The Teddy Bear Band have been reserved. If you have any entertainment ideas
or know of any local groups you think might be interested in participating in nest years
celebration please give me the groups name or have them contact me at 651452-1850, thanks!
Rink Attendants
Rink Attendant job postings were mailed to last year's rink attendants and will be posted at area
high schools and colleges. If you know of anyone interested in this position please have him or
her contact me. y
Recreation Program Information Line
The recreation program information line has been programmed for the fall/winter 2000/2001
seasons. The program hotline number is 651-255-1175. - —
MENDOTA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
INCIDENT SUMMARIES - PARKS
CN: 00002936 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Stolen Property Recovered
DATE: 08/01/2000 19:30:0 OFFICER: Anderson, D 2204
LOCATION: Mendakota Park
10-OS-2000
SYNOPSIS:
A purse was found in the Mendakota Park parking lot. Contact was later made with the purse owner's husband who advised the
purse had been stolen at 1830 hours in Apple Valley (CN 400004335). Richard Novak later responded to the MHPD and took
custody of the purse.
I contacted
Apple
Valley PD and advised them of the recovery.
The purse was missing a cell phone,
driver's license, credit cards
and cash.
CN: 00002968 OFFENSEIINCIDENT: In Park After Hours
DATE: 08/03/2000 22:50:Ot OFFICER: Rosse, T 2237
LOCATION: Victoria Hinhlands Park
SYNOPSIS:
On 08-04-2000 at 2250 hrs, I responded to Victoria Highlands Park concerning kids playing basketball in the park. On scene I
spoke with two teenagers who were just playing basketball under the light of their vehicle. Both parties were very cooperative ,
and agreed to leave the park. I advised them of the complaint and regulations pertaining to the park hours.
CN: 00003023 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Criminal Damage to Vehicle
DATE: 08/07/2000 12:14:0 OFFICER: Piotraschke, J 2206
LOCATION: Lilydale Road /Great River Trail
SYNOPSIS:
Complainant reported the R/F window of her van (604LJP) was shattered while parked adjacent to the Great River Trail on
Lilydale Road. The damage, which was done to facilitate entry in order to steal her friend's purse, was done between 1145 and
1210 hours. There was nothing at the scene to indicate the method used to break the window and there were other items in the
vehicle that were left untouched. There is no further information available. (See #00003024) ///jcp
CN: 00003024 OFFENSEIINCIDENT: Theft from Vehicle
DATE: 08/07/2000 12:14:0 OFFICER: Piotraschke, J 2206
LOCATION: Lilydale Road / Great River Trail
SYNOPSIS:
Victim reported leaving her hand bag on the right front floorboard of her friend's van while they used the Great River Trail
between 1145 and 1210 hours on 08/07/00. The van was left parked on Lilydale Road adjacent to the Trail junction.
When the victim and her friend
returned to the van, they discovered that the R/F window
of the vehicle had been shattered,
and
the purse taken. Victim's purse
was described as a light -green cloth (similar to macrame)
and contained her Mn D/L, VISA
Card,
TCF checkbook, house keys and
W cash. Dejarlais said she hid the handbag under another
item, but the suspects) moved that
item and stole the purse. There
was nothing of evidentiary value in or around the vehicle.
No further information available.
(See
CN 00003023) ///jcp
INCIDENT SUMMARIES - PARKS 10-05-2000
CN: 00003038 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Loose Dog
DATE: 08/08/2000 U:l l:0 OFFICER: Anderson, D 2204
LOCATION: Ivy Falls Park
SYNOPSIS:
Dispatched to the Coley Residence regarding a loose dog report. Contact was made with Nancy Coley and her son Steven
concerning an incident which had occurred earlier in Ivy Falls Park. I also made contact with the owner of the other involved dog
(Usem). See narrative.
CN: 00003172 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Suspicious Vehicle (In Park After Hours)
DATE: 08/17/2000 23:38:0 OFFICER: Lambert, B 2234
LOCATION: Wentworth Park
SYNOPSIS:
Responded to area on complaint. Nobody found in park. Officer cleared.
CN: 00003197 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Check The Welfare
DATE: 08/19/2000 17:18:01 OFFICER: Larrive, J 2233
LOCATION: Wentworth Park
SYNOPSIS:
Dispatched to Wentworth Park to check the welfare of an adult male and a child. The comp reported that the male was asleep
in a car with a child. I checked on MN Lic#786MBN, the owner and male sleeping is Kevin Phillip Fiat. Fiat was sleeping after
finishing work. His daughter was inside the car and was fine.
CN: 00003214 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Theft From Vehicle
DATE: 08/20/2000 18:50:0 OFFICER: Larrive, J 2233
LOCATION: Mendakota Park
SYNOPSIS:
On 08-20-2000 at 1850 hours, I was dispatched to Mendakota at on a report of Theft from Vehicle. I arrived and met the
owner/victim Puvvala who was waiting next to her vehicle (MN Lic#864NKB). Puvvala stated that she parked her vehicle in the
parking lot at approximately 1600 hours, returned at 1845 hours and discovered her purse missing. Puvvala's purse contained the
following items: two checkbooks, one from Wells Fargo, the other from T.D. Waterhouse. Also removed was her MN DL and
approximately $30-40 in cash. The rear passenger window was smashed to gain entry. No suspect information available.
CN: 00003215 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Theft from Vehicle/Scenic Overlook
DATE: 08/20/2000 19:08:0 OFFICER: Anderson, D 2204
LOCATION: Scenic Overtook
SYNOPSIS:
INCIDENT SUMMARIES - PARKS
]O-Os-2000
On 8-20-00 at 1740 hrs., Smith parked her vehicle in the Scenic Overlook parking lot. On her return at 1830 hours, it was
discovered that perpetrator(s)
unknown had broken the passenger side front door window and removed a briefcase which was in the front seat. The briefcase
(value $70.00) contained
a calulator ($30.00), make-up ($50.00) and medical books ($100.00).
There are no known witnesses to this ncident, and this CN is pending any future investigative leads.
CN: 00003237 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Loose Dog
DATE: 08/22/2000 17:32:0 OFFICER: Anderson, D 2204
LOCATION: Scenic Overlook Parkin; Lot
SYNOPSIS:
Squads dispatched to Scenic Overlook regarding a dog at large. On arrival, I observed a large male dog (brown in color) with a
collar & no tags/ID. The breed of dog is unknown, but it appeared similiar to a rottweiler mix. The dog appeared to be stressed
out and would not respond to anybody that was attempting to contain it. The behavior of the dog made it appear that it was
dropped off in the park, as it continually ran over to every vehicle that traveled into the lot. I summoned Forepaws to respond,
and after a long period of time, the dog was finally captured.
CN: 00003253 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Theft from Auto
DATE: 08/23/2000 13:02:Oj OFFICER: Rosse, T 2237
LOCATION: Valley park
SYNOPSIS:
On 08-23-2000 at 1302hrs, I responded to Valley Park concerning a Theft from Vehicle. On scene I met with Elise Schendel the
owner of lic#941KEF, who said that sometime prior to 1125hrs on 08/23 somebody broke out her driver's side window with an
unknown object and stole her purse and contents. The owner did see a tan compact vehicle with juveniles inside drive out of the
park in an unknown direction, unknown if related . No witnesses or suspects at this time
MENDOTA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT
INCIDENT SUMMARIES - PARKS 10-05-2000
CN: 00003427 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Found Property
DATE: 09/04/2000 15:00:0 OFFICER: Larrive, J 2233
LOCATION: Great River Tr
SYNOPSIS:
On 09-04-00 at 1500 hours, Karl Harare arrived at the Mendota His P.D. in order to turn over some found property. The property
is a man's black leather wallet (See Attached Property sheet). Harare stated that he found the wallet near the train bridge in
Lilydale by the bike trail. The owner of the wallet is Mark David Sauer I 1-20-66.1 located a phone number and left a message on
the answering machine reference the found wallet. Sauer called the police department and advised that he would be en route to
pick up the wallet. The wallet and belongings were turned over to Sauer.
CN: 00003430 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Suspicious Occupied Vehicle
DATE: 09/05/2000 06:45:0& OFFICER: Lambert, B 2234
LOCATION: Wentworth Park
SYNOPSIS:
Spoke with adult caucasion male driver of WI license plate AJ 15581. He stated he was waiting for a friend who lives in the area
to get off work. Officer cleared and responded to residential alarm.
CN: 00003521 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Driving Complaint
DATE: 09/11/2000 15:18:0 OFFICER: Rosse, T 2237
LOCATION: Rogers Lake Park
SYNOPSIS:
On 09-1 I-2000 at 1518 hrs, I responded to Rogers Lake concerning a driving complaint. On scene I spoke with the comp , who
said while sitting in his car (#EGZ964) in the parking lot area, a vehicle described as a white Blazer sport utility vehicle
#EMZ524 entered the same parking area in the park and begun to drive in careless manner, spinning circles in the rock- gravel
throwing gravel and dirt against the comps vehicle. The comp at that time exited the vehicle as the driver of the sport utility fled
the scene. I advised the comp that I would call the owner of the vehicle since the information he related was accurate with plate#
and vehicle. The comp said that his phone # may be given out to the violator since he would like the violator to agree to car wash
for his vehicle. I attempted to make contact with the vehicle owner but was unable at this time. A follow up report is pending
further contact.
Follow Up:
On 09-12-2000 at 1330hrs, I made contact with the parent of the driver and vehicle owner, she agreed to contact the complainant
as he requested to make arrangements for a car wash. I contacted the comp, no answer but I left a brief message.End of report.
CN: 00003577 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: D.O.B's
DATE: 09/15/2000 20:53:0 OFFICER: Convery, B 2230
LOCATION: Ivy Falls Park
SYNOPSIS:
Report of D.O.B.'s acting suspicious in the park. Located a groupof neighborhood boys playing basketball in the park.
INCIDENT SUMMARIES - PARKS
lo-Os-2000
CN: 00003667 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: Suspicious Person/ Check the Welfare
DATE: 09/24/2000 10:18:0 OFFICER: Patrick, S 2231
LOCATION: Ivy falls Park
SYNOPSIS:
Dispatched on a report of a person sleeping in a pickup at Ivy Falls Park, Upon arrival I observed a Ford Ranger MN LIc/ CTV
842. The occupent was Ryan Alvarez, who had an argument with his parents and thought it would be wise to leave home for the
night. Everything was/appeared to be ok.
CN: 00003674 OFFENSE/INCIDENT: DOB's / Arson
DATE: 09/24/2000 16:02:01 OFFICER: Piotraschke, J 2206
LOCATION: Bicycle Trail - Aztec Park
SYNOPSIS:
An anonymous pedestrian reported two non-descript juvenile males starting small fires in the middle of the bike path, between the
senior high-rise and Apache. They ran when she came upon them. The fires were stomped out by the comp. I checked the area.
No hazard. NO FURTHER REPORT. //jcp
City of Mendota Heights
Memo
October 10, 2000
Memo to: Parks and Recreation Commission
From: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
Subject: Proposed Project Sequencing for
Parks Five Year (2001 to 2005) C.I.P.
Funding Available for Park Improvement Projects
Following are the projected revenues for the Special Park Fund during the
next five years (2001 thru 2005).
1. Donation from MHAA (matching funds) $ 81000
2. Antenna fees committed by Council ($60k x 3) $180100C
3. Interest (est. $20,000 per year x 5 yrs) $100,00C
4. Residential & Commercial Developments
a. Town Center Residential $100,000
b. Town Center Commercial $ 75,000
c. Pilot Knob/Acacia Area (Res. or Comm.) $ 75,000
d. Infill residential lots $ 37,000
5, Current Fund Balance (Dec. 31, 2000) $360,000
5 Year Total,,",,,.,"*", hem two ago ago E$935,,000
Assuming the City Council will wish to use dedicated fees from Town Center
for park related improvements in the Town Center Development and assuming the
Park and Recreation Commission desires to maintain the Special Park Fund at a
minimum balance of $300,000, the amount available for improvement projects will
be $460,000 or approximately $90,000 per year, less staff time, leaves funding in
the $80,000 per year range for actual project costs.
Recommendation
I recommend that the eleven playground areas be upgraded to meet current
ADA and Consumer Product Safety Guidelines during the next three years at an
estimated cost of $165;000.00 ($144,000 plus 15% contingency). I propose the
following schedule:
2001: Friendly Hills Park $15,000
Roger's Lake Park $18,000
Marie Park $ 51000
2001 Total $ 38,000 + 15% ($61000) _ $44,000.00
2002: Hagstrom-King Park $20,000
Mendakota Park $ 81000
Ivy Hills Park $10,000
Valley Park $18,000
2002 Total $56,000 + 15% ($8,000) _ $64,000.00
2003:Wentworth Park $15,000
Victoria Highlands Park $12,000
Kensington Park $ 81000
Valley View Heights Park $15,000
2003 Total $50,000 + 15% ($7,000) _ $57,000,00
Priority No. 2: Warming House Improvements
I recommend the following improvements be considered:
1. Marie Park:
a. Re -grade area around existing warming house $3000
b. Install paved pathway from parking lot to warming
house doors and to rink areas $4,000
c. Replace posts and boards of hockey rink $12,000
d. Install hand railings along paths and benches near
rink for changing skates $4,000
e. Replace existing rink lighting $11,000
f. Install lighting along pathways and on warming
house $ 2,000
Total recommended improvements $36,000.00
2. Wentworth Park
a. Demolish existing warming house and replace with
one similar in size to other parks $25,000
b. Install paved pathways from parking area to
warming house and rinks $4,000
c. Install hand rails along pathways $2,000
d. Install lighting along pathways and install benches
near rink for changing skates $4,000
e. Replace rink lighting $1 1,000
Total recommended improvements $46,000400
3. Friendly Hills Park
a. Install handrails from warming use to rink,
install safety lighting, and benches near rinks for
changing skates $7,000
Total recommended improvements $7,000400
4. Ivy Hills Park
a. Demolish existing warming house $2000
Total recommended expenditure $2,000000 1
Priority No. 3: Planning
The City commissioned the first Comprehensive Park Development Plan in
1971 and in 1985 Barton-Aschman prepared the 1985 Park and Recreation Facility
Needs Study. The City is now almost totally developed and the opportunity to add
or acquire new acreage is very low and most of the existing parks are fully
developed with no room for new facilities. Now is the time to begin planning how
to maintain or re-establish native plant species and to develop long-range
maintenance plans that will enhance or improve our parklands.
I recommend the City hire a consultant to development of a Park Natural
Resource Plan. Development time for such a plan, including public and commission
workshops and review would take approximately from nine months to one year and
cost in the area of $25,000 to $40,000.00,
Carryover project from 2000 to 2001: Roger's Lake Park
Installation of eight -foot wide bituminous path from fishing dock to existing
bituminous trail and safety and informational signing related to fishing and the
dock. Estimated cost: $ 61000.00
Other priorities...
I have no other recommended priorities, but the following list of projects
have been suggested by Council, the Parks Commission, or interested residents.
I recommend the Commission establish priorities for those projects they wish to
include in the Parks Five Year (2001-2005) Capital Improvement Plan.
1. Valley Park: Cross Country Ski Trails: Phase 1 $5,000
Phase 2 $10,000
2. Trail Signage: Informational & Safety along Phase 3 $15,000
22 miles of trails $6,000
3. Kensington Park: Bleachers (4) with conc. Pads
4• Mendakota Park: Safety Netting over Hub Area $ 5,000
$
5. Mendakota Park; Storage Building ,000
6• Kensington & Mendakota Parks: Security devices for $1100,000
restrooms to prevent vandalism $5,000
7. Friendly Hills Park: Pedestrian bridge to tennis courts -
replace with culvert $2,000
8. Bang Board in an existing tennis court
9• Mendakota Park: Sand volleyball court $3,000
$
10. Mendakota Park: Extend turf sprinklers to sign area $3,000
11. Hagstrom-King: Full size basketball court ,00
$15
12. School Dist, 197: Safety fencing and players benches at 000
Somerset & Mendota Elementary Schools $16,000
13. Fountains in Ponds: Installation cost, per pond $10,000
Yearly maintenance: est. $1, 500
Tennis Courts
The City has six double tennis courts all constructed in the early 1970's.
They are maintained on a rotating basis every six years by the addition of a color
topcoat and new striping. Valley Park was resurfaced in 2000 at a cost of
$4,800,00. The courts at Ivy, Roger's Lake, and Friendly Hills are developing large
uneven cracks, which cannot properly be repaired by adding a topcoat. In 2001 the
City Budget includes $12,000.00 (from the General Fund) for resurfacing one
double tennis court. The entire bituminous surface will be removed by a milling
operation and a new asphalt surface installed. Following this a color topcoat and
striping will be applied. Maintenance of the tennis courts was not include in the
above projects because I assume the City Council will continue to include these
costs in the General Budget.
If the Commission desires to "speed up" this process and rebuild one or more
of the deteriorating courts they may want to add this item to the Parks Five Year
C.I.P.
Action Required
The City Council has requested the Parks and Recreation Commission to
deVeiop a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan with the understanding that
upgrading of the play equipment areas is a prime priority and has allocated
$60,000 per year for the next three years towards this goal. The Commission
should review the above recommendations and establish a list of projects to be
included in the Five Year C.I.P. for Council consideration.