Loading...
1996-04-09 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 9, 1996 6*30 p.m. - City Council Chambers Call to Order 2. Roll Call Approval of February 13, 19961�imutes Mendota Heights Athletic Association T-Ball Update • Norm Gellerman, Executive Director MHAA • Sue Hanson, MHAA T-Ball Commissioner 5. Bethel Baptist Church Request for Mendakota Field • Pastor Don Delich, Bethel Baptist Church 6. Saint Thomas Request for Tennis Courts 7. Dakota County Annual Information Sharing Meeting Fort Snelling State Pazk Advisory Committee Update • Chris Esser, Recreation Programmer 9. North Urban Regional Trail 10. Updates • Dakota County Parks and Recreation Council Committee meeting • Proposal for Partnership - Mississippi River Coordinating Commission • Parks Report • Police Report • Mendakota Lights Task Force 11. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for disabled persons aze available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 12, 1996 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, March 12, 1996 in the City Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. The following members were present: Liberacki, Libra, Spicer, Norton, Linnell and Damberg. Commissioner Kleinglass was excused. Also present were Interim City Administrator Kevin Batchelder, Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander and Recreation Programmer Chris Esser. KENSINGTON SOCCER FIELD Commissioner Libra inquired if the Kensington soccer fields would again be top dressed this spring. Parks Project Manager Kullander responded yes, that the soccer fields at Kensington had already received two or three applications of top dressing at this stage and that a fourth top dressing will occur this spring including over seeding. INTRODUCTION OF NEW RECREATION PROGRAMMER - CHRIS ESSER Chair Spicer introduced the new Recreation Programmer, Mr. Chris Esser to the other members of the Parks and Recreation Commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Linnell moved to approve the February 13, 7996 minutes with corrections. Commissioner Liberacki seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 MENDAKOTA PARK LIGHTS TASK FORCE Interim City Administrator Batchelder stated that the City Council had s` considered a feasibility study for lights at the Mendakota Park ballfields at their February 20, 1996 meeting. Batchelder stated the City Council WENTWORTH PARK Parks Project Manager Kullander stated the 1996 Capital Improvement Plan had scheduled $20,000 to be budgeted from the Special Park Fund for improvements in Wentworth Park including a picnic shelter, grills, enlarged warming house and enlarged free skating area. Kullander stated that at the Park Commission's last discussion of this issue they had stated their intent to provide one shelter similar to the picnic shelters existing at Kensington Park. Kullander stated that if we go with a larger size than the 16' x 16' shelters in Kensington Park we will incur the costs of an architect to design the building. Kullander stated that if we go with a 16' x 16' picnic shelter then we can use the Kensington plan as is without the need to hire an architect. Kullander estimated the cost of this to be approximately $1100000 Kullander described where the grills would be installed and stated that it was a possibility to place some stone benches in the picnic area. Kullander stated that the Commission had expressed an interest in brushing out the trees in the area north of the parking lot and that this could be done and a woodchip trail could be placed through these trees to open this area. Kullander stated the purpose of brushing out this wooded area would be to help the pine trees and significant trees thrive. Kullander described the enlarged free skating area. He discussed enlarging of the warming house and the potential that an enlarged warming house could also be used in the summer for recreation classes. The Commission discussed the appropriate size and number of picnic shelters for Wentworth Park. The Commission agreed that extra picnic tables should be placed around the picnic shelter as a place for people to congregate for picnics. Commissioner Damberg moved to recommend that a 16° x 16' shelter similar to the design at Kensington Park be placed in Wentworth Park in 1996. Commissioner Norton seconded the motion. Commissioner Linnell expressed a concern that a 16' x 16' shelter might be too small for Wentworth Park. Linnell stated that both Valley Park and Fioger's Lake Park have 20' x 24' picnic shelters that are capable of holding four picnic tables underneath the roof. The Commission discussed the appropriate size of a picnic shelter in Wentworth Park and the appropriate amount to budget for a shelter that is of a similar design and size as Kensington Park. The Commission discussed this constituent's request and instructed Recreation Programmer Esser to invite the T-ball Commissioner to visit with the Parks and Recreation Commission in April so that the Parks Commission could review the T-ball program, its costs and the City's annual subsidy. Chair Spicer stated that Mendota Heights Athletic Association T-ball program has age restrictions because of safety issues and the abilities of children at those ages. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 8:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Batchelde.� Interim City Admi ator TO: Parks and Recreation Commissioners FROM: Chris Esser, Recreation Programmer RE: Mendota Heights Athletic Association T-Ball Update DATE: April 3, 1996 The City of Mendota Heights has been subsidizing the Mendota Heights Athletic Association for their T-Ball program since 1988. The subsidy was created when the City no longer sponsored youth T-Ball, and the program was turned over to the Athletic Association. Norm Gellerman, Executive Director of MHAA, and Sue Hanson, T-Ball Commissioner of MHAA, have been invited per Commission's request to present an overview of the current T- Ball program and policies. The purpose of their presentation is to answer any questions and/or concerns the Commission may have in regards to the T-Ball program. Discuss Mendota Heights Athletic Association T-Ball program and its policies. TO: Parks and Recreation Commissioners FROM: Chris Esser, Recreation Programmer RE: Bethel Baptist Church Mendakota Fields Request DATE: Apri13, 1996 Pastor Don Delich of Bethel Baptist Church has requested the use of all four Mendakota Fields for Fridays, May 3rd to August 16th. The fields are available due to the cancellation of the Friday City -sponsored Co-Rec league. The concern of granting the request is the issue of residency status of the church softball league. Pastor Delich, who submitted the request, is a Mendota Heights resident, however, the sponsoring organization, Bethel Baptist Church, is not located in Mendota Heights. Also, stated in Pastor Delich's request, fewer than 50% of the league participants are Mendota Heights residents. These factors raise resident vs. non- resident fee issues. Pastor Delich has requested to present his league information to the Commission, and will attend April 9th. Resident or non-resident fee recommendation for Bethel Baptist Church softball league. I. SHELIER/BUILDING RENTAL (continued) E. Reservations will be tentatively recorded in the reservation book when called in. Applicants will have hree working days to submit deposits and fees or their reservation may be canceled. F. A damage deposit of $100.00 will be required by all roues reserving picnic shelters in the parks, with the exception of nonprofit youth service organizations. The deposit is due when making the written reservation. The facility will be inspected immediately after the event and provided there are no damages, or clean-up costs, the deposit will be returned promptly. G. The Mendota Heights Police Department and Parks Maintenance crews will be notified of all reservations. 11 H. Groups wishing to reserve shelters shall abide by the attached rules and regulations and a copy of the park permit will be issued by the City to the sponsor setting forth the terms for the use of the shelter. The attached rules and regulations are identified as "Exhibit A". I. Mendota Heights schools, nonprofit civic organizations and City of Mendota Heights employee organizations are fee exempt. These groups must, however, pay a damage deposit. There will not be a park attendant on duty. The reserving group is responsible for supervising the event and for cleaning the reserved area. K. The refund policy for canceled reservations shall be: Cancellation 14 days in advance 100 % refund Cancellation 1 to 13 days in advance 50 refund Refunds due to inclement weather on the day of the event will not be considered. There will be no additional charge for rescheduling of events postponed due to weather. A. Volleyball Nets $ 5.00 per day B. Extra picnic tables $ 5.00 each (limited quantity available) C. Horseshoes $5.00 per set A deposit of $10.00 will be required for equipment rentals excluding picnic tables. IV. FIELD/SITE RESERVATIONS (continued) All requests for field reservations will be made in writing between January 1 and March 15. Field reservations will be confirmed by April 1 and any requests received after March 15 will be handled on a first come, first served basis. The field reservation priorities are identified as Exhibit "C". B. Soccer $35.00 per field for non-residents Field preparation $25.00 per field for weekend tournaments All requests for field reservations for the summer season (May 1 through August 15) will be made in writing between January 1 and March 15. Field reservations will be confirmed by April 1 and any requests received after March 15 will be handled on a first come, fast served basis. All requests for field reservations for the fall season (August 16 through October 31) will be made in writing between 7tine 1 and July 15. Field reservations for the fall season will be confirmed by August 1 and any request after July 15 will be handled on a first come, first served basis. The field reservation priorities are identified as Exhibit "C". C. Ice Rinks $20.00 per site per hour for non -residents $5.00 per rink per hour for lights. There will be no reservations between 12:00-6:00 p.m. on weekends and School Holidays. D. Volleyball Courts First come, first served, except City sponsored programs E. Basketball Courts First come, first served F. Tennis Courts -Tennis courts are available on a first come, first served basis for Mendota Heights residents and are not to be reserved. The following community groups may reserve tennis courts with the permission of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council - Mendota Heights Athletic Association, the Mendota Heights Senior Tennis Association, and all public and private schools in Mendota Heights, G. The following groups are exempted from the above described fees, excluding field preparations which willbe determined and negotiated on a case by case basis: Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Department, Mendota Heights Athletic Association, Sibley Area Girls Fast -pitch, Sibley Sting Soccer and nonprofit* organizations within Mendota Heights city limits. *Proof of non-profit status is required. EXIiIBII "C" 1 1. First priority will be given to programs sponsored by the Mendota Heights Recreation Department, 2. Second priority will be given to organized youth programs of Mendota Heights, including, but not limited to, Mendota Heights Athletic Association, Sibley Area Girls Fast -pitch, and Sibley Sting Soccer. Organized youth programs are those programs with the following characteristics: a. The program is offered on a community wide basis for open participation by the general youth public; and b. The program is offered on an on -going, annual basis; and c. The program is targeted to similar age brackets on an annual basis; and d. The intent of the program is to serve a broad range of youths in the community and not be exclusive in nature. e. Community is defined as pertaining to Mendota Heights residents. 3. Third priority will be given to youth programs of Mendota Heights that are not considered organized youth programs. 4. Fourth priority will be given to organized adult programs in Mendota Heights. The larger the number of Mendota Heights residents in the organized adult program, the higher the priority for field reservations. 5. Fifth priority will be given to Resident/1?rivate Groups. 6. Sixth priority will be given to non-resident youth or adult programs. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Apri14, 1996 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission and Interim City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern SUBJECT: St. Thomas Request for Tennis Courts Discussion Mr. Jack Zahr, Athletic Director for St. Thomas Academy, has made a request to reserve tennis courts in Mendota Heights for the upcoming spring tennis season. Specifically, the request is for the reservation of Roger's Park and Valley Park courts from April 1, 1996 to June 1, 1996 from 3:15 pm to 5:15 pm, Monday through Friday. According to Parks Reservation Policy, tennis court reservations must be made through the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. Last year a similar request was made by St. Thomas Academy. The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council approve a request by St. Thomas Academy for the reservation of Roger's Lake Park and Valley Park tennis courts from April 1, 1995 until June 1, 1995, from 3:15 pm to 5:15 pm, Monday through Friday, under the condition that if a reservation at Valley Park proves to be problematic, then St. Thomas would use Marie or Wentworth Park instead. The Council followed the Planning Commission's advice. Recommendation If the Commission wishes to recommend approval of this request to the Council, it may want to once again apply last year's condition. Action Required Discuss St. Thomas Academy's request and advise the City Council. TO: Parks and Recreation Commissioners FROM: Chris Esser, Recreation Programmer RE: Dakota County Annual Information Sharing Meeting DATE: April 2, 1996 The Dakota County Parks and Advisory Committee has extended an invitation to Commissioners to attend their annual information meeting. The meeting is scheduled for 4:30 p.m., Thursday, May 16, 1996 at the Spring Lake Park Reserve Youth Camp Lodge. The purpose of this meeting is to "promote communication and understanding of our unique and complimentary roles as park agencies within Dakota County." Each agency will present a short description of their department's mission/vision, current projects, initiatives, and issues. I will be attending the meeting and request a volunteer commissioner to accompany me. Dinner will be provided. Attached is a copy of the letter from the County describing the purpose and details of the meeting. Thank you for your consideration. DAKOTA COUNTY 8500127TH STREET EAST- HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 Deaz City Pazk Director: PARKS DEPARTMENT (612)438-4660 FAX (612) 437-4560 March 22, 1996 On behalf of the Dakota County Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PARAC), I am pleased to invite your park committee and director to what is becoming an annual information sharing meeting. This meeting is scheduled for 4:30 PM, Thursday, May 16, 1996 at the Spring Lake Pazk Reserve Youth Group Lodge. (Directional map enclosed.) The purpose of the meeting is to promote communication and understanding of our unique and complimentary roles as pazk agencies within Dakota County. Time has been scheduled for each agency to provide a 5 - 8 minute presentation on your department's mission/vision, current projects, initiatives and issues. If you are unable to make a presentation, could you make arrangements with someone within your agency to do so? Also, to facilitate discussion, we ask that you mail or fax a copy of your agency's mission vision statement to: Dakota County Pazks Departrnent, 8500 127th Street East, Hastings, MN 55033. Our fax number is 437-4560. Enclosed you will find a copy of Dakota County Pazks Mission Statement for your review. Thanks for your assistance regarding these items. Lastly, the agenda provides one hour for an informal inter -agency discussion of our roles as park agencies and for whatever other subject matter the group finds important. Supper will be provided, so please RSVP Deb Peters at the Dakota County Park Department Office at 438-4665 by Monday, May 13, 1996, so arrangements can be made. I look forward to meeting with you and your park committee members. Sincerely, Bob Doffing, Chair Dakota County Park and Recreation Advisory Committee Enclosures c: Park Committee Members BD/jjf o:parjoint t Printed on recycled paper, 20%posl-consumer n AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOVEfl Philosophy: Dakota County believes that accessible recreational opportunities and the preservation of the natural environment are important elements which contribute to a high quality of life. Dakota County believes that all of its citizens should have opportunities for recreation and be able to enjoy nature in settings unhindered by the pressures of development. Dakota County believes that the well-being of its residents requires land be set aside for preservation and recreation. Dakota County is commuted to developing parks with high quality facilities that provide a variety of natural resource - oriented recreational and learning opportunities. Dakota County believes that parks are a legacy to be left for future generations. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Apri14, 1996 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission and Interim City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern SUBJECT: Fort Snelling State Park Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion Recreation Programmer Chris Esser will attend the meeting of the Fort Snelling State Park Advisory Committee and will update the Commission at their April 9 meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Apri14, 1996 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission and Interim City Administrator FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Intern SUBJECT: North Urban Regional Trial Discussion Attached is a copy of the revised draft development plan for the North Urban Regional Trail. In October of last year, the City of Mendota Heights clearly expressed its objection to any significant changes to Valley Park (see attached letter by Kevin Batchelder and accompanying Resolutions.) Dakota County does not appear to have made any concessions to the City in regards to Valley Park in this most recent addition of the development plan. The only significant changes from the previous draft relate to the West Saint Paul portion of the trail. Dakota County held an Open House to review the development plan on April 4, 1996 (see attached letter.) Staff will provide a verbal update of what happened at the Open House at the April 9 meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission. An Open House for public comments on the Revised Draft Master an for the North Urban Regional Trail will be held on Thursday, April 4, 1996, at the Wentworth Library, 199 East Wentworth Avenue, West St. Paul, Minnesota. Interested citizens are invited to attend the Open House anytime between 4:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m, to meet informally with County staff. No formal presentations will be given. Complete copies of the revised draft Master Plan will be available at the Open House and will also be available for review at the Wentworth Library. At their August 151 1995 meeting, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners adopted a trail alignment for the North Urban Trail. After the alignment had been adopted, Staff from the Office of Planning was approached by Mrs. Olivia I. Dodge to investigate a possible trail alignment alternative. On November 7, 1995 the County Board authorized a reevaluation of the North Urban Trail alignment. County staff has met with the consultant retained for this project, Barton-Aschman, Associates; staff members from the affected local units of government, Lilydale, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, and South St. Paul; Mrs, Olivia I. Dodge; and representatives from the Dodge Nature Center. A Revised Draft Master Plan for this east -west connection, the North Urban Regional Trail, has been completed. All comments on the Revised Draft Master Plan for the North Urban Regional Trail will be taken at the Open House. Written comments are also welcome and will be included as part of the public testimony. Written comments will be accepted until Friday, May 3,1996. Please send written comments to: Dakota County Office of Planning NURT Comments 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124-8579 PdNCTAPNTC-PPR 1 I 1 I 1 1 O Wil IWO 0 U F91a Q101' 91 I I 1 Dakota County Division of Physical Development 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124-8579 June 1994 Revised February 1996 Revised March 1996 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 TABLE OF CONTENTS �►.� r u �uw : ; 1. NORTH URBAN REGIONAL TRAII....................................... 1 Description..........................................................1 Purposeof Plan.......................................................1 Scopeof Plan...............................:........................2 PreferredCorridor....................................................2 2. NEED AND JUSTIFICATION ........................................... 2 Introduction......................................................2 Regional Trail Service Area ............................................. 3 Recreation Trends....................................................3 Local Park and Trail System Access ...................................... 4 Transportation Functions...............................................4 3. PROJECT AREA ...................................................... 5 4. FACILITY PLAN.....................................................6 Users...............................................................6 DesignCriteria.......................................................6 Trailhead Facilities...................................................7 5. PREFERRED TRAIL CORRIDOR ........................................ 9 Segment 1—Lilydale Road (CSAH 45)..................................... 9 Segment2--Valley Park...............................................11 Segment 3--TH 110........................................ ........13 Segment 4-01ivia I. Dodge Property ..................................... 15 Segment 5- Charlton Street .. 17 Segment 6- Garlough Park/Marthaler Park ................................ 19 Segment7wmWentworth Avenue.........................................20 Segment &-Oakdale Avenue (CSAH 73).................................. 22 Segment 9—Thompson County Park ...................................... 24 Segment 10--Kaposia Park/Simon's Ravine ................................ 25 6. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES .......................................... 27 7. OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT ..................................... 27 Trail Ownership.....................................................27 Public Safety and Security.............................................28 Stewardship..# .....................................................28 Trail and Right -of --Way Maintenance. 28 Dakota County is evaluating development of a regional trail across northern Dakota County. Exiating and planned regional recreational facilities will be linked by the proposed Dakota County North Urban Regional Trail. Development of the trail is included in the County's 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Program. Implementation of the trail is subject to approval of this Development Plan and funding approval. The Metropolitan Couacii's current Recreational Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan identifies a proposed regional trail corridor across northern Dakota County. The trail corridor is intended to be planned, acquired, or developed by 1996, and is included in the Capital Improvement Program for Regional Recreation Apen Space, Fiscal Years 1994-1999. The Metropolitan Council's policy plan states "Trail corridors are intended to provide for recreational travel along linear pathways throughout the metropolitan area. They are selected to follow natural or man-made features that traverse areas of scenic appeal and/or historical architectural and developmental interest. The regional trails are selected to pass through or provide access to elements in the regional park and park preserve system. The parks and park reserves perform the important function of offering places for parking, comfort facilities, safe water supplies, etc. Trails are also selected for their ability to intersect with local trail networks, with the regional trails functioning much like regional highways that interconnect with more local arterials and collector streets." The Dakota County North Urban Regional Trail ie intended to provide an off -road trail connection across northern Dakota County. The trail will traverse the communities of Lilydale, Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, and South St. Paul, and provide a link to two regional trails being developed along the Mississippi River. The trail will connect residential areas with parks, schools, libraries, government offices, recreational facilities, and commercial areas. This plan identifies a preferred regional trail corridor for northern Dakota County. Aa evaluation of the feasibility of constructing a regional trail across northern Dakota County and the public need is included. The objectives of this plan are: • To define a preferred route for a regional trail across northern Dakota County. The trail is intended to provide a connection to the northwest aegmeat of the Big Rivers Regional Trail at Lilydale Regional Park and the South St. Paul riverfroat segment of the Northern Dakota Regional Trail. • Identify natural and manmade features that can be linked by the trail. • Identify existing physical features, land use, conflicts and opportunities, and a development program for each segment of the trail. • Gain input from cities, agencies, organizations, and the public to guide the formulation of the implementationtmaster plan for the trail. This report contains a description of the proposed North Urban Regional Trail, an overview of recreation needs and required facilities, an evaluation of the proposed trail corridor, and a description of the implementation plan. The trail corridor is divided into 10 segments for description and analysis. Existing physical features, land use, conflicts and opportunities, and a development concept are described for each trail segment. Implementation issues for the regional trail plan are identified with proposed solutions. The attached appendix contains a capital improvements summary, comments from public agencies and citizens, and other relevant documents and technical data. Development of a regional trail across Dakota County will provide many challenges. Northern Dakota County is substantially developed and has areas with rugged topography. Any trail corridor will traverse areas with steep slopes and limited public right -of --way. There is an expressed need to provide trail facilities for recreation and transportation purposes. The trail corridor provides a link for a variety of public facilities. A variety of potential corridors across northern Dakota County were evaluated. Corridors considered are shown on Figure 2. A preferred corridor was selected based on physical features along the corridor and input from the staff of the affected communities. The preferred corridor uses a substantial amount of existing trail, passes through five different public parks and is intended to mmn=e impacts to private property. Figure 3 shows the preferred corridor. 2. NEED AND JUSTIFICATION The need and justification for a regional trail in northern Dakota County has been assembled from a variety of different sources highlighted in this section. The corridor's natural, physical, and cultural characteristics support its designation as a regional public use resource. Justification for its development and operation is established by the following items: • Primary and secondary service area characteristics • Local and national recreational trends • Relationship to regional park and open space facilities • Relationship to local parks and trail access • Linkages to other regional open space systems • Transportation functions 2 O M M : O N M f N n O O 1I] t[) ti co .--i N N K) L d' ^r N M O t00 O O O O O O i O M N O [� 00 M O N 00 0 w eq co N .N+ N N H w m �: N 0 �a o. 0 C. OD O O N O N O G N O O N b .Z O O O ti CV M t� h M ti pj i M h O N .-� N N Ifs CD N O: N M EE a 0 w aw 6 00 L� v rn ti o m c O- Op M- N N UT CO N cc dCO CC QOi M ~ 5 O N v N 0 N M a W E• z � O c i d d ., m x o m > Ix a N� y CQ co 0 z a > m F Commuter connections to employment centers would be improved such as the Mendota Heights office park, Robert Street businesses, and Concord Street commercial area In combination with existing local trails, the North Urban Regional Trail provides a network for alternative transportation. 3. PROJECT AREA The project area in northern Dakota County is bordered on the south by TH 110 and on the north, east and west by the Mississippi River. In this area, the Mississippi River Valley is characterized by wide floodplain, wetlands with lakes and marshes, floodplain terraces, and high bluffs with steep slopes. The native landscape along the trail corridor has generally been developed, with the exception of the parks identified on'Figure 3. The preferred trail corridor is 7.7 miles long, with 3.8 miles traversing park land, 3.2 miles within public roadway right -of --way along residential or commercial frontage, and 0.7 miles through public school property. Because the project area is substantially developed, a trail corridor that does not traverse areas with, existing residential or commercial frontage is not feasible. The corridor passes through the following public parks: • Lilydale-Harriet Island Regional Park • Valley Park (Mendota Heights) • Garlough Park (West St. Paul) • Marthaler Park (West St. Paul) • Thompson County Park (Dakota County) • Kaposia Park (South St. Paul) The corridor provides direct access to the following public facilities: • Garlough Elementary School • West at. Paul City Hall • Dakota County Northern Service Center • Wentworth Library • West St. Paul Sports Center (ball field Complex) • Proposed West St. Paul Golf Course Site right -of --way existing trails have been constructed much closer to the curb than six feet. These locations should be reviewed for specific clearance requirements. See Figure 4 for illustration of typical trail cross section. Surfacing: Proposed trail surfacing is bituminous pavement for the treadway with turfed shoulders. Crushed limestone could be used for the shoulders in locations where heavy pedestrian use may occur along the trail edges. Vertical Alignment: Generally, longitudinal slopes should not exceed 5 percent (5400t rise over 100400t distance). Where the trail traverses the river bluffs to connect with the regional trails along the Mississippi River, longitudinal slopes of 10 percent for a distance of about one quarter mile are necessary. Flat rest stops should be provided about every 200 feet along segments with slopes exceeding five percent. Approaches to trail and roadway intersections should have slopes under 2 percent. Design Speed. Maximum design speed for bicycles and roller blades on the trail is 15 mph. Adequate curvature and sight distance should be provided in accordance with AASHTO criteria to meet the design speed. Due to physical constraints exceptions to the design speed may be necessary at specific locations. Design speed exceptions should be properly signed to warn users. Signing and Lighting: For the safety and convenience of the trail users the trail corridor should have a uniform system of signs and pavement markings. Guide signs sad route markers should be used to give information and identify the trail. Traffic control signs and markings should be used to alert users of intersections, design exceptions, and regulatory requirements. Traffic control devices are also needed to alert motorists at trail crossings. Traffic control devices should conform with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Lighting should be provided at trail/roadway intersections and trailhead parking lots. Trailhead Facilities Within the public park land along the trail corridor, trailhead facilities will be provided. These facilities could include the following items: • Rest Rooms UI ® o 0 2' 8' (EXISTING TRAIL) 2' SH. 10' MIN.(NEW TRAIL SH. I I `" I ® - I BITUMINOUS 1 �j�i 1 1 �/./ i �� � \�2 . \ �M q 1O 8' MINIMUM WIDTH IF EXISTING TRAIL IS USED. 10' MINIMUM WIDTH FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. 12' OR WIDER MAY BE NEEDED TO ACCOMADATE ALL USE. O2 2' MINIMUM BOULEVARD WIDTH TO PROVIDE SPACE FOR SIGNS AND POSTS. 5' MINIMUM WIDTH IS DESIRABLE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND CLEAR ZONE TO FIXED OBJECTS. GENERALLY SHOULDER IS TURF. CRUSHED ROCK MAY BE USED IF HEAVY USE OF SHOULDER IS EXPERIENCED. O3 6' MINIMUM BOULEVARD WIDTH IS DESIRABLE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE SPACE FOR SIGNS, POLES AND SNOW STORAGE. ® LONGITUDINAL SLOPE SHOULD NOT EXCEED 5�, IF FEASIBLE. TYPICAL CROSS SLOPE IS 2�. NORTH URBAN REGIONAL TRAIL DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DESIGN CRITERIA Bartoa-Aschman Associates, Inc. . i�� na,a .... t. sw. sso wM.w�.. �� awe Po�aa Figure 4 Development Plan: • About 1,400 feet of new trail with rest stops must be constructed along the south and east sides of Lilydale Road behind the guard rail. Retaining wall is necessary at some locations. • Trail signing and markings should be installed. • Trail head facilities may be provided at Lilydale-Harriet Island regional park in conjunction with the Big Rivers Trail. 10 Deout ipfion: Valley Park is a city park adjacent to Interstate 35E. At Marie Avenue just east of I-35E, Valley Park has a parking lot, picnic shelter, portable toilet, tennis courts, and playground. An existing eight -foot wide bituminous trail exists in Valley Park. This trail runs from Lilydale Road south to the intersection of TH 110 and Dodd Road. This trail was built by and is currently maintained by the City of Mendota Heights, and could serve as the regional trail. Physical Features: Topography of this segment is characterized by rolling Terrain with mixed hardwood forest and wetlands in the low areas. The native landscape has been partially disturbed by I-35E, Marie Avenue and adjacent neighborhood park facilities, and a high voltage power line corridor that exists within the park. Native soils identified in the "Survey of Dakota County" are generally characterized as loam or sandy loam within the upland areas and silt loam or muck within the drainage ways and upland depressions. The loam and sandy loam soils are moderately well drained to excessively well drained. The silt loam and muck soils are poorly. drained. Soils disturbed by development can not be generally characterized. Land Use: Area land use bordering Valley Park is generally residential. Along TH 110 at the south edge of the park commercial uses exist. Commercial use at TH 110 and Dodd Road includes fast food restaurants, convenience stores, and strip retail. Opportunities and Constraints: Valley Park facilities will be available to trail users, but may need to be expanded to accommodate both trail users and city residents. An underpass exists where the trail crosses Marie Avenue. The existing trail has some short segments with longitudinal slopes exceeding five percent. These segments should be reconstructed with flatter slopes. The existing eight -foot trail needs to be widened in the future to accommodate all users. Development Plan: • About 1,600 feet of the existing trail should be reconstructed to provide flatter slopes and repair cracked pavement.. • Trail signing and markings should be installed. 11 GMQment 3mmTH 110 Description: This segment is located along the north side of TH 110 from Dodd Road to Charlton. From Dodd Road to about one -quarter mile east, vacant land exists within the TH 110 right-of- way. There should be adequate space to locate the trail along TH 110 east of Dodd Road if Mn/DOT does not plan to use the right -of --way. Further east where the TH 110 frontage road is located immediately north of TH 110, the trail may be located between the frontage road and westbound TH 110 ,if a design acceptable to Mn/DOT can be developed. An alternate location would be along the north side of the frontage road. Construction along the north side of the frontage road would impact the front yards of approximately 13 homes. Physical Features: Topography of this segment is characterized by rolling terrain and suburban development. The native landscape has been modified by construction of highways and buildings. Native soils identified in the "Survey of Dakota County" are generally characterized as loam or sandy loam within the upland areas and silt loam within the drainage ways and upland depressions. The loam and sandy loam soils are moderately well drained to excessively well drained. The silt loam is generally poorly drained. Most of the soils along this segment of the corridor have been disturbed by development and can not be generally characterized. Land Use: Area land use along the north side of TH 110 is generally residential. Commercial use at TH 110 and Dodd Road includes fast food restaurants, convenience stores, and strip retail. Opportunities and Constraints: The trail will cross Dodd Road on the north side of TH 110 at an existing signalized intersections with cross walks. The trail will provide improved access to Valley Park. Construction of the trail along the south side of the TH 110 frontage road will require filling the ditch and installation of storm sewer, construction of fence and Mn/DOT approval of the design. Shifting the frontage slightly north and addition of curb along the south side should be considered during design development. Single-family residential homes exist along the north side of the TH 110 frontage road. If located on the north side of the frontage road, the proposed trail corridor would impact the front yards of 13 homes. About 35 feet of right-of4ay exists north of the edge of the frontage road. This width is adequate for trail construction, but clearing of vegetation and grading is necessary to construct the trail. Temporary easements may be needed, so driveways and yards 13 Development Plan: • About 3,800 feet of new trail must be constructed within the Olivia I. Dodge Property. • Acquire three -acre parcel adjacent to the Olivia I. Dodge Property. Acquire from the Dodge Nature Center. • Trail signing and markings should be installed. Additional regulatory signage may be required within the Olivia I. Dodge Property to facilitate trail user activities within this segment of the trail. • Privacy fencing or landscaping may be required along the utility easement section to buffer the trail from the adjacent homes. • Drainage swales within the Olivia L Dodge Property may require installation of culverts under the trail to facilitate drainage requirements. megment 5--Charlton Street Description: This segment involves construction of a new trail along Charlton Street in West St. Paul. This segment would connect the Olivia I. Dodge segment to Garlough Park. The trail would cross Charlton Street and Marie Avenue. Physical Features: Topography of this segment is characterized by gently rolling terrain aad suburban development. The native landscape has been modified by construction of roads and buildings. The Dodge Nature Center property along the north side, of Marie Avenue is a large undeveloped parcel that previously was farmed and has been converted to open space for interpretive use. Native soils identified in the "Survey of Dakota County" are generally characterized sandy loam within the upland areas. The sandy loam soils are well drained. Most of the soils along this segment of the corridor have been disturbed by development and can not be generally characterized. Land Use: Area land use along the south side of Marie Avenue is residential. Open space exists within the private Dodge Nature Center along the north side of Marie Avenue. Garlough Park is located along the east side of Charlton Street north of Marie Avenue in West St. Paul. Opportunities and Constraints: The privately owned Dodge Nature Center is located along much of the north side of Marie Avenue. The proposed trail would not cross any driveways along Chariton Street. The trail would cross Charlton Street, and Marie Avenue at intersections controlled by stop signs. Existing six-foot walk along Charlton Street north to Garlough Elementary School would need to be widened or replaced to function as the trail. At the back of the existing sidewalk, there is a steep embankment that would require clearing and a wall to widen the walk away from the street. 17 Description: This segment consists of existing walk and trail that connects the Charlton Street segment with Marthaler Park near the West St. Paul City Hall on Wentworth Avenue. Within Garlough and Marthaler city parks there is existing trail segments. Physical Features: Topography of this segment is characterized by rolling terrain and suburban development. Native landscape exists within Garlough and Marthaler Parks, and consists of mixed hardwood forest wetlands in low areas and park open space. Native soils identified in the "Survey of Dakota County" are generally characterized as sandy loam within the upland areas and silt loam within the upland depressions. The sandy loam soils are well drained. The silt loam is poorly drained. A large area of Garlough Park consists of poorly drained soils. Soils disturbed by development can not be generally characterized. Land Use: Area land use along bordering Garlough and Marthaler Park is generally residential. Open space exists within the parks. The intersection of Wentworth Avenue and Humboldt Avenue is located at the northeast comer of Marthaler Park. Land use along Wentworth Avenue is mixed commercial and residential. Opportunities and Constraints: From Garlough Elementary School, there is an existing eight -foot trail that passes through a wooded area of Garlough Park, and connects w Kraft Road. The existing trail crosses Kraft Road at a mid -block location and connects witha trail through Marthaler Park. The existing eight -foot trail passes through a wooded area of Marthaler Park and connects with the parking lot and picnic shelter in Marthaler Park. Existing facilities in Marthaler Park will be available to trail users. New facilities maybe requires to meet the needs of trail users. A new trail needs to be developed from the Marthaler Park parking lot to the intersection of Wentworth Avenue and Humboldt Avenue at the northeast comer of the park. 19 Development Plan: • Existing eight -foot wide trail in Garlough and Marthaler Park needs to be widened in the future to accommodate all users. • Some short segments of existing trail should be reconstructed to flatten slopes. • Trail signing and markings should be installed. • About 1,000 feet of new trail must be constructed in Marthaler Park to connect with Wentworth Avenue. • Trail head facilities in Marthaler Park may need to be improved. Seffm+ent 7»Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) Description: This segment consists of existing eight -foot trail along the north side of Wentworth Avenue from Humboldt Avenue east to Oakdale Avenue. Physical Features: Topography of this segment is characterized by rolling terrain and suburban commercial development. The native landscape has been modified by construction of roadways and buildings. Native soils identified in the "Survey of Dakota County" are generally characterized as sandy loam within the upland areas and silt loam within the upland depressions and drainage ways. The sandy loam soils are well drained. The silt loam is generally poorly drained. Most of the soils along this segment of the corridor have been disturbed by development and can not be generally characterized. Land Use: Area land use along Wentworth Avenue consists of a mix of commercial uses. West St. Paul City Ball and the Dakota County Northern Service Center are located at Humboldt Avenue. A variety of retail businesses exist near the Robert Street intersection including auto services, restaurants, strip retail, and discount department stores. The Dakota County Wentworth Library is located east of Robert Street along with a single family residences, medical offices, and a photo business. Opportunities and Constraints: There is existing eight -foot wide trail along the north side of Wentworth Avenue. This trail segment provides access to the Dakota County Northern Service Center, the Robert Street commercial area, the Wentworth Library, and the West St. Paul Sports Center. Development Plan: • In the future, existing eight -foot trail along Oakdale Avenue may need to be widened to accommodate all users. • About 1,200 feet of the existing six-foot trail along the east side of Oakdale must be widened to eight feet. This may require right -of --way acquisition from some properties. • Trail signing and markings should be installed. • Screening may be required along residential yards (vegetation and/or low walls). 23 Opportunities and Constraints: The route along the bottom of Simon's Ravine requires moderate grading, drainage considerations, and stabilization embankment requirements. A portion of the route along the ravine may require a grade of about.10 percent. Flat rest stops should be provided along this segment at about 200400t intervals. This segment will not be suitable for wheel chairs or skaters. The route within the ravine will require the need for a trail crossing at 19th Avenue. Opportunities exist for trail users to experience a unique natural setting. At the location where Simon's Ravine crosses Concord Street, homes were removed due to flooding concerns. A large open space exists that could be used to construct trailhead facilities. A connection to the Northern Dakota County Regional Trail along the riverfront could be provided by crossing Concord Street and the railroad tracks. Concord Street has average daily traffic of about 9,000 to 10,000 vehicles and good sight distance, so a mid -block cross- walk could be considered. The railroad crossing is not part of this plan and will be included with the riverfront regional trail. Development Plan: • About 5,200 feet of new trail must to be constructed. • The segment near the bottom of Simon's Ravine will require some retaining walls and a culvert or bridge to cross under 19th Avenue. • Culvert(s) or pedestrian bridge(s) may be required along segments of the ravine depending upon the trail alignment. 4 A pedestrian crossing of TH 56 should be provided. Q 6. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Major issues resulting from development of the trail and possible solutions are summarized below: • Rugged topography at each end of the trail presents challenging conditions for trail construction and trail users. Long and relatively steep grades are necessary to connect with the regional trails along the Mississippi River. Proper signing should be used to warn trail users of steep grades. Signs should limit the use of these segments to bicycles and pedestrians. Flat rest stops will be provided at approximately 200-foot intervals. Trailhead facilities should be provided at each end of these segments. • Minimal impacts to private property will result from construction of the trail. The preferred corridor was selected because it minimizes the number of front yards disturbed by the trail. For yards that are impacted vegetative screening and low retaining walls will be provided to reduce impacts. • Trail operation and maintenance will require efforts from both the cities and Dakota County. Cooperative agreements will be developed to clearly define operation and maintenance responsibilities. • Project phasing is an important consideration. Segments of the trail and trailhead facilities will be developed as funding becomes available. Segments should first be developed to link the existing trail segments. Initial development will consist of link ezasting eight -foot wide trail segments. Depending on the amount and type of use experienced, the trail may need to be widened in the future to safely accommodate all users. Generally, the trail will be located within public parks and public right -of --way, with the exception of the Olivia I. Dodge Property segment. Ownership of the land where the trail is located could remain with the public agency that currently controls the right -of --way or property. An agreement and acquisition of property will be necessary for the Olivia I. Dodge Property segment. Agreements between Dakota County and the municipalities will also be needed to create an understanding of the trail's ownership, maintenance, and operation responsibilities. 27 Municipalities where the trail is located will enter into.cooperative agreements regarding construction, operation and maintenance of the trail. To the extent identified within the cooperative agreements, public services will be required to operate and maintain the trail. The trail is located along and crosses public roadways controlled by the municipalities. Dakota County Dakota County will enter into cooperative agreements regarding construction, operation and maintenance of the trail. To the extent identified within the cooperative agreements, public services will be required to operate and maintain the trail. Dakota County Highway Department is responsible for segments of roadway along which the trail is located and crosses. MnLl2QT The proposed trail corridor is located along Trunk Highway 110 within Mn/DOT right-of- way, and will cross TH 56. Mn/DOT approval is required for these portions of the trail. MetroWlitan Council The Metropolitan Council is responsible for administering the major funding source for the proposed trail. The master development plan must conform with Metropolitan Council requirements, and must be approved by the Council. 9. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Public participation is development of this plan occurs through a variety of public meetings held to provide information and hear comments on the proposed North Urban Regional Trail. Anticipated public meetings are listed below: • Lilydale City Council Meeting • Mendota Heights City Council Meeting • West St. Paul City Council Meeting • South St. Paul City Council Meeting • Dakota County Board Meeting • Public Information Meeting on this document 10. PUBLIC AWARENESS Consistent with other Dakota County Regional Parks, the County will promote public awazeness of the North Urban Regional Trail through various forms of media information 29 SEGMENT 1 LILYDALE ROAD PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION JUNE 17,1994 COST ESTIMATE QUANTITY NEW 10' TRAIL 1 L.F. 1, 400 30.00 42,060 RETAINING WALL <10' w FENCE L.F. 300 100,00 30,000 SIGNING k MARKINGS • L.S. 1 2000.00 2,000 S IMATING CONTINGENCY - 2 2ff 14, 800 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $880800 $22,200 R SEGMENT 2 VALLEY PARK PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION JUNE 17,1994 COST ESTIMATE i NEW 10' TRAIL 1 L.F. 1, 600 30.00 48,000 SIGNING h MARKINGS L.S. 1 2000400 2, 000 ES IMATING CONTINGENCY - 207. 2 10000 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 11 $60 r 000 O $15,000 Eslimale bored on conceptual pMn. Prajetl Adminisfrolion, design fees, engineering dr lestinq services, permits, elc. am by 9snao cc man Asacc: as. Ine. 1 SEGMENT 6 GARLOUGH PARK / MARTHALER PARK PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST JUNE 17, 1"4 REVISED FEBRUARY 22,1996 ESTIMATE NEW 10'TRAIL (1) L.F. 1100 $30 $33.000 SIGNING & MARKINGS L.S. 1 $2.000 $2.000 RETAINING WALL p1(T) L.F. 200 $200 $40.000 ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY - 20% (2) $15.000 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $909000 NON -CONSTRUCTION COSTS - 25% (3) SY2400 S112S00 1 ngaumed typical trail construction cost with minor grading. DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAIL HEAD FACII 2) Estimele basal on conceptual plan. 3) Project Adminislralion, design tees, engineering 8lesting aervkes, permits, ate • esaumed to ha 25X SEGMENT 9 THOMPSON COUNTY PARK PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST JUNE17,1994 ESTIMATE :..... . y. NEW 10'TRAIL (1) L.F. 1400 $30 WOOD TH3-PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE S.F. 3000 $120 $360,000 SIGNING & MARKINGS LS. 1 $2.000 I52 000 ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY - 20% (2) Ste• TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $48000 NON -CONSTRUCTION COSTS - 25% (3) $121.200 SEGMENT 10 KAPOSIA PARK / SIMON'S RAVINE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE JUNE17,1994 REVISED FEBRUARY 1.1996 3 sqqq r "55 ^F'F. s, UNM R . MAT "WIIF s K 4diP+MITYz al k 3 f�°�%' PRtC��4 ... `"5,�5 �yH H NO .<.T. NEW 19TRAIL (1) L.F. 6200 $30 $156.ODO SIGNING & MARKINGS L.S. 1 $2.000 S2,DOO STORM SEWER L.F. 500 S30 S15.ODD RETAINING WALL (d0') L.F. 1000 $100 $1000000 PED. BRIDGE S.F. 120D $120 $144,OD0 ESTIMATING CONTINGENCY - 20% (2) S148.1100 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $496,400 NON -CONSTRUCTION COSTS IF 25% (3) $124.600 s:.. 5623,000 1) Assumed rypiw hail comlruetion cod with minor grading. DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAIL HEAD FACILITIES OR R.O.W. 2) Fslimda bawd on concapluel pion. 3) Project Administration, design loos, apinwrinp & tasting sW*8$, permits, do - assumed to be 25% PeeEared bx Barton-Aschmon Assadatm In& 5.3 DAKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT CObII�ITITEE OF THE WHOLE REQUEST FOR COMIKTITEE REVIEW DIVISION: PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: Office of Planning Contact Person: Jack Ditmore Telephone Number: 891-7030 Prepared By: John Forrest\Chaatell Public Comment: ITEM: NORTH URBAN TRAIL UPDATE MEETING DATE: EXPENDITURE: Budgeted: Non -Budgeted: Kadin Other Funding: N/A. Informational: X X At the June 23, 1993 meeting, the Physical Development Board Committee recommended that 'the County Board direct staff to begin the development of plans for an east -west connection between the Northwest (Soo Line Corridor) and the Northeast (Mississippi Riverfront) Regional Trail segments in Dakota County. The master plan for this connection is to be completed in June 1994. County staff has been meeting with the consultant retained for this roject (Barton-Aschman, Associates) and staff members from the affected local units of government to discuss optional approaches to an east -west trail connection. The potential trail has been divided into four segments -- Lilydale to Charlton Street, Charlton to Livingston Street, Livingston to Trunk Highway 3, and Trunk Highway 3 to Concord Street -- for analysis. From three to six options for routing a trail in each segment are under study. (See Attachment l.) The alternatives were shared with City staff on Wednesday, March 9. City staff will be taking the alternative trail routes to their city parks commissions for further discussion and advice to the County and its consultant. These comments will be considered in the draft plan. A draft of the "Master Plan for the North Urban Trail" is expected to be complete in late May. After County Board approval, the draft plan can be released for public review in a June or July timeframe. Ne action is recuired on this item. Louis J. Breimhurst, Director PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Jack Ditmore, Deputy Director PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION $randt COUNTY n:jfa3-22 ou000s BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Motion by Commissioner Maher RESOLUTION NO. 93-579 Seconded by Commissioner_._ Turner WHEREAS, an east -west trail connection in northern Dakota County is identified on Metropolitan Council Concept Maps and in the Master Plan for South St. Paul Riverfront and Regional Trail Concept; and WHEREAS, an east -west trail linkage between the two established regional trail corridor segments is an important and necessary connection; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners finds that planning for 'the development of an east -west connection between the Northwest (Soo Line Cooridor) and the Northeast (Mississippi Riverfront) regional trail segments in Dakota County should begin immediately; and WHEREAS, the immediate development of an east -west connection between the regional trail segments in Dakota County was not anticipated in the 1993 budget of the Physical Development Division/Office of Planning and budgeted resources are fully allocated in 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Dakota County Board of Commissioners directs that staff immediately begin_ development of a plan for zn east -west trail connection between the Northwest (Soo Line Cooridor) and the Northeast C' ,sissippi Riverfront) Trails in Dakota County, with completion of the plan 1993; and 3E IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a budget amendment to the 1993 Physical development Division/Office of Planning budget be authorized in the amount of a25,000, with the funds to come from the Parks Reserve Fund balance; and YES Harris X Maher X 8ataglia X Richards X Turner Z Jensen Z Loeding State of Minnesota County of Dakota Harris Maher 8ataglia Richards turner Jensen Loeding NO 1. Joan L. Kendall. Clerk to the Board of the County of Dakou. Stan of \Lnnesota. do hrreoc ceni;'y thaz 1 have compared toe foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of Countc Commissioners. Dakota County. Minnesota, at char session held on the 29th day of June 15 now on 61e in the Count: Administration Department, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal of Dakota Countv this v day of ��� September 9, 1994 Dakota County Office of Planning NORT Comments 14955 Galaxie AVe. Apple Valley, MN 55124-8579 To Whom It May Concern: The Dakota County Board has apparently gone off the deep end once again in believing we taxpayers must have and pay for another boondoggle, aka "North Urban Regional Trail". I have some questions that should be read aloud at the hearing on September 222 1994 with request that answers be given to each at the meeting. r 1 - Who on the Board proposed this trail? r 2 - How much did you pay the consultants for this plan? 3 - Why do you hire consultants when you have Director, Deputy Director and numerous others in the planning department? Are they not capable? ;i 4 - Why does the description and notice of hearing containing well over 1000 words describing the project but only 11 words relating to costs to build? '• 5 - What" will be the annual cost in maintaining this blacktop path, i.e.- snow plowing, weeding, sweeping, patrolling, patching, etc.? Black top deter orates from extremes in weather alone and requires regu;ar sealing and re -surfacing. # 6 - What are the "estimated" usage of such a path which meanders in and out of extremely high density automobile traffic? " 7 - Where will the monies come from to pay for this fiasco? Please do not answer "...federal or state grants, etc." since those "grants" are our tax dollars. Each Commissioner who pushed this idea should be made to walk the entire "trail" in order to actually see the stupidity of the project.The Commission should kno�•: country is 4 trillion dollars in debt, much of it caused by politicians and bureaucrates who spend monies that do not exist on unnecessary, unplanned and just plain dumb projects. Taxpayers are no concept of fed up fiscal with wacky responsibilities. ideas from politicians "Politicians and are the bureaucrztes who hat:e san2a11 over. They promise to build a bridge where there is no river." (N. Khrushchev) Ms. Chantell Kadin August 2, 1994 Page two In addition to the discussion that evening, the staff memorandum prepared for the City Council meeting included a number of issues that the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed at their meeting on July 12, 1994 or are the results of staff meetings. This includes: 1. A review of a fence or concrete barrier between the trail and Highway 110. 2. The possibility of a safer, more adequate, landing approach for the Valley Park trail as it approaches Dodd Road. 3. Maintenance agreements following construction and costs for lighting, telephones and trail widening. 4. Upgrading the Marie Avenue underpass and the possibility of an overpass for Highway 110 near its intersection with TH149. Again, thank you for the presentation to City Council on the draft plan. Your cooperation and assistance have enabled the City to focus on the issues that may arise with this project and our City Council is generally supportive. It is our understanding that the Dakota County Board of Commissioners will consider the draft plan and possibly schedule public hearings in September. -Please keep us informed of any progress on the Draft Plan for the North IIrban Trail. In the meantime, if you desire any clarification, or further information, please contact me as soon as possible. Sincerely, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant CC: John Forrest, Dakota County Tcu. ;, «ell, %i�y'Adnunistrator Guy Kullander, Engineering Technician CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL 1616 HUMBOIDT AVE., WEST ST. PAUL, MN 551183972 ADMINISTRATION 552-0100 POLICE AND FIRE 552-0200 EMERGENCY 911 � TDDJt 552.4222 June 30, t994 Mr. John Forrest Division of Physical Development Dakota County 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Dear Mr. Forrest, Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed plans for the North Urban Re��ional Trail. Our written comments essentially echo our verbal ones: 1�'e would suggest that the existing trails be�accepted into the system at their current widths. Our citizens would not favor any tree removals along our park trails; we doubt that the volume of travel will require such work. Likewise, the residents along Oakdale were extremely sensitive about the width of the trail on that narrow ritht-of-way. That said, the proposed trail links should be very beneficial for our citizens, and the County staff is to be commended to the Board for their active effort to obtain re��ional fundin�� for the proposed work. WPC:dkm Yours very truly, William P. Craia! City Manaecr AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITYlAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Ms. Chantell Kadin Page Two April 21, 1994 The City of Mendota Heights appreciates the opportunity to provide input and desires to be kept informed on any .:decisions or directions that the County is taking with the North. Urban Trail and its location. We would especially appreciate an opportunity to review and comment on the draft plan that is being prepared. Thank you for your time and consideration. . Sincerely, bit000tt bat., Revin Batchelder Administrative Assistant cc: Bill Craig, City of west St. Paul Randee Nelson, City of South St. Paul to 4 IF A At OF At' 4 - h r it Alt��. .JId&dwL It se.wz ` a• IV too. j `` E Y !: i. ` F � ' > AAA r. .:. YT _ pp, �II,�� Cleo.': '�� 'C'} i `„+. 4 t .A FAA 4 ;oI, it . i �K Mt r ;. F 'i t , CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAU1 December2l, 1993 Mr. lack Ditmore Deputy Director PhyscalDevelopment Division 14955 Galaxie A venue App/ Valley, MN 5312448579 Dear Mr. Ditmore. 125 THIRD AVENUE NORTH SOUTH ST, PAUI, MN 55075-2097 L „q � YSi0A! n E 11 ADhL On behalfoftheCityofSouth St. Paul, please accept thisletterasoursupport oftheDakota County Board's commitment to develop a east -west trail connection to adjoin the South St. PaulsegmentoflheNorthernDakota CountyRegionalTmil. WetrulyapnrwatetheDakota County Board of Commissioners' decision in designating this project as a priority for !be citizens of the northeast section ofDakota County. Wecontinue to appreciate the efforts oftheDakota CountyBoardandilsstall'in assistingour City to acquire and develop a regional trail along the Mississippi River in South St. Paul. Sincerely, Randee L. Nelson Director ofParks and Recreation RLN.LTR:dj cc : Mayor Kathleen Gaylord Doug Reeder, City Adminis[rator Don Maher, Dakota County Commissioner City of .,..., Mendota Heights October 239 1995 Mr. Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Dakota County Administration 1590 West Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033-2372 Dear Mr. Richardson: On October 17, 1995, the City Council of Mendota Heights adopted Resolution No. 95-56, A RESOLUTION OF RM NT REGARDING THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE NORTH URBAN REGIONAL TRAIL. The City Council has asked me to forward a copy of this resolution to your office so that the Dakota County Board of Commissioners can be made aware of the intent of the City of Mendota Heights, especially in regards to the use of Valley Park as part of the North Urban Regional Trail. (Please see enclosed resolution.) ]n February of 1995, the City of Mendota Heights had adopted Resolution No. 95-10 in general support of the North Urban Regional Trail, with the condition that no physical changes or improvements be made to the existing trail in Valley Park. However, the Master Plan adopted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners indicated that a possible parallel trail and other improvements were planned for Valley Park. Therefore, the City of Mendota Heights has gone on record stating its intent for the future of the Valley Park trail in the enclosed resolution. Would you please see that your Board is made aware of our City Council's resolution regarding the North Urban Regional Trail. Should you have any questions, or wncerns, please contact me at 4524850. Sincerely, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant ce: Patrice Bataglia, County Commissioner Tom Lawell, City Administrator 1101 Victoria Curve •hiendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 • I 1 • :I Air 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95- to WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights and its Parks and Recreation Commission have assisted the Dakota County Physical Development Division in its planning process for the North Urban Regional Trail; and of h- North Urban Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, Dakota County has requested the official position of the City of Mendota Heights with respect to the North Urban Regional Trail Master Plan. NOW THEREFORE BE TT HEREBY RESOLVID by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that there is general support of the North Urban Regional Trail Master Plan provided that there are no physical changes or improvements to Valley Park Trail and provided that the location of the trail along Highway 110 Frontage Road be on the south side of the Frontage Road. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 21st day of February, 1995. ATTEST: thlcen M. Swanson, City Clerk • i Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor United States Department of the Interior�r , NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Mississippi National River and Recreation Area ( 175 Fifth Street East, Suite 418, Box 41 I MAR 1�ry 79� St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2901 IN REPLY REFER TO: March 15, 1996 Dear River Enthusiast, We appreciate your participation in preparing the attached Proposal for Partnership between the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area and the Science Museum of Minnesota. The Mississippi River Coordinating Commission will consider this proposal at their meeting on April 1 at 6:30 p.m, in the Metropolitan Council Chambers. We invite you to attend. The Metropolitan Council building is located at 230 East 5th Street in St. Paul. You should use the entrance on the south side of the building. Parking is provided in the ramp south of the building. Sincerely, (i JoAnn Kyral Superintendent Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River and Recreation Area National Park Service Proposal of Partnership 15 March91996 1 Vision To bring together the Science Museum of Minnesota (SMM) and the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) in a partnership that enhances the power A both to interpret the entire Mississippi River and its watershed, particularly the stretch in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Science Museum of Minnesota brings: • a great city location; • a large established general audience; • a research focus on riverine systems; • first -quality exhibit development skills; • a rich array of camps and classes serving schools and families; and • the ability to raise funds from private sources. The Mississippi National River and Recreation Area brings: • a great river -side location adjacent to the Lilydale flood plain forest; • standing connections to interpretive sites along 72 miles of the river plus three other units of the National Park System along the Mississippi (Effigy Mounds National Monument, Jefferson National Expansion Memorial and National Historic Site, Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve); • the ability to raise funding from park service sources; • a potential audience of adults and families interested in natural and cultural history and outdoor recreation; and • its connection to the National Park Service with its world-wide reputation for quality educational programs & visitor experiences. These two organizations propose to form a partnership to create for the public a unique facility focusing on the Mississippi River featuring: • the only national center dedicated to interpreting the Mississippi River; • a one -stop information center for planning trips to places of interest along the Mississippi, to national parks, and to related sites world-wide; • a rich and wonderful exhibition gallery on the history, ecology, and economics of the Mississippi River and Watershed; • a shared, in -town, riverside, group programming center and trailhead; • connections with organizations and individuals throughout the United states that focus on the Mississippi River and its watershed; • increased political and financial potential for developing outdoor exhibits and programming along the river (for instance, River Park); and • enhanced programming to serve families and other diverse audiences. Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 3 Visitors will be able to choose from these resources within the Center to gather information about the Mississippi River and National Parks: Orientation This will be the starting point for visitors who want to learn about the Mississippi River. The range of experiences inside the Science Museum —the Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery, special programs and performances, and the Center itself —will be promoted. Also highlighted will be an orientation to MNRRA and educational experiences about the river. Models will show the three rivers in the metro area and the entire Mississippi River watershed. Interactive stations will provide information about Mississippi River attractions and programs and about National Park areas. Educational experiences will be highlighted. Trip Planning A full range of materials will provide information for those planning a trip through the watershed, to one or several units of the National Park System, or to other areas with a similar focus world-wide. Visitors will be able to send an electronic inquiry to hundreds of sources of information. National Park Rangers will help visitors gather the resources they need to plan exciting adventures. Students can collect resources in this area to prepare reports on the Mississippi and National Parks. Take-home Materials Books will reveal the many aspects of the Mississippi and the diversity of the National Park System. Maps will guide the adventurer by foot, automobile, or watercraft. Videos and software will bring possibilities to life. Brochures from National Park areas, attractions, and river towns will provide site -specific details. Many of these materials will be provided free of charge; others will be available for purchase. Guest Appearances Each week, the spotlight shines on a different river attraction, educational program, park, or resource. Experts on the subject give programs in the Center, the Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery, or elsewhere in the museum. Associated with these programs are special exhibits, audiovisual presentations, and collections of resource materials. This area will tap expertise from across the country and, occasionally, from elsewhere in the world. Twenty-first Century Library This resource area will focus on providing access to information about current river and park issues using the best technology available. It will highlight information for citizens wishing to become involved in caring for the river. Much of this information will also be placed on the World Wide Web. Students will be able to collect specific, up-to-the-minute data for in-depth study of the Mississippi and National Park System sites. They will also be able to communicate electronically with professionals managing these resources. Resource Science Update This area will highlight current river and park research and provide a listing of opportunities for youth and adult science learning. In summary, the Mississippi River National Center will be a dynamic place that provides up-to-date information using technology designed to serve the individual needs of visitors. As compared to more traditional National Park Service visitor centers, the Center will provide a more integrated, service -oriented approach. Up to date information technology will serve visitors' individual needs. Each visit to the Center will be an immersion in the sights and sounds of the magnificent Mississippi River and our cherished National Parks. Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 5 • The character of the Mississippi River in the future largely will be the result of human decision making. Exhibition Location and Character The exhibition will be located in the 5,000 square foot gallery that forms the entrance to the fee area of the Science Museum of Minnesota. This gallery connects to a large outdoor terrace that overlooks the river and river valley. A few exhibit components will be located in free areas such as on the Kellogg Boulevard River Overlook and within River Park, a new public area located on the river bank in front of the new Science Museum building. The exhibition is planned to combine a high percentage of interactive components (that encourage visitors to learn actively through demonstration of phenomena and testing theories) within a rich environment of objects, photographs, and human stories. Over the ten-year lifespan of the exhibition, MNRRA and the Science Museum will implement regular changes to keep the exhibition content current with ongoing research on the Mississippi River and to provide new experiences for returning visitors. Key Concepts and Questions The key concepts and questions will expand on the project themes. They will be used to identify and delineate the particular exhibit components and programs that will comprise the Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery. 1. What Is The Mississippi River? — Where Did the River Come From? How long has the Mississippi River existed? What were the geologic processes that brought it and its watershed about? How do Native Americans explain the origins and existence of the river? How has the river changed from pre -glacial to glacial to post -glacial times? Will there always be a Mississippi River? Peoples of the Great River Archaeologists have found evidence of human occupancy along the Mississippi River going back at least 12,000 years. What is it about the Mississippi that has made it an attraction for human endeavors since people first set foot in North America? From Cahokia of 1100 AD to Minneapolis/Saint Paul of today, why do major cities tend to be found adjacent to waterways? How did peoples of the past use the Mississippi River and how do these activities contrast and compare to how we use the river today? Mississippi River in Our Hearts and Minds The Mississippi River is the subject of a remarkable quantity of music, literature, art, and crafts. It is also an international icon. Why is the Mississippi River known around the world? Why does this river exert such a strong effect on the human imagination? What do these outpourings of human creativity reveal about what we think and feel about the river? The Working River The present-day Mississippi River is a significant locus for human enterprise in the Upper Midwest. From Minneapolis to St Louis, thousands of barge tows every year ply their way along the nine -foot navigation channel. How does the river work as an artery for commerce? How do locks and dams work? What are the "rules of the road" on the Mississippi River? What are the commodities that move up and down the river and why is water the preferred way of transporting such commodities rather than highways, railways, or the air? In what ways does the Mississippi River connect the center of the United States to the rest of the world? Drinking the River The Mississippi River is central to our lives not only for its commercial role but because for many of us it serves an absolutely vital need — a source Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 7 because of human alterations of the river and its watershed? now significant are these changes to the continued ability of the river to sustain its complex ecosystem and maintain those qualities that make the river so appealing to people? What does it mean to say that the river is dying? Can a river really die? What is the Future of the Mississippi? Humans are the most significant agent of change on the globe, and this is no less true in the watershed of the Mississippi River. The Mississippi River of the future will be a river largely shaped by human activity, either inadvertently or by design. What kind of river do we want? The river is home to otters and eagles and is an international superhighway for agricultural commodities. How do we reconcile the diversity of visions for the river? How is society's ever-increasing scientific knowledge and technological prowess shaping the ways in which we envision the river's future? MNRRA and the Science Museum of Minnesota will join with the City of Saint Paul to plan and to raise funds over the next ten years for the development of expanded outdoor exhibits, outdoor classrooms, and outdoor programs about the Mississippi River and the Mississippi Watershed for pedestrians and park users. The exhibits will be concentrated in three areas: on the Kellogg Boulevard River Overlook near the new Science Museum Building and MNRRA's Mississippi National Center; within River Park, the parcel of land lying between the relocated Shepherd Road and the Mississippi River stretching from Head House down river and to the South of the Science Museum; and within Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. The outdoor classrooms will be concentrated within Crosby Farm Park and Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. The outdoor programs will be concentrated within River Park and within Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. Kellogg Boulevard River Overlook Exhibits located off Kellogg Boulevard near the new Science Museum building will orient pedestrians to the river scene they see spread out before them and introduce them to some of the natural and human activity going on there. For instance, a three- dimensional map of the river valley might be used to help users identify both landforms and landmarks. An illustration might show the site when the channel of the great River Warren covered much of the land between the river bluffs. A large windmill/weather vane might identify prevailing wind patterns in the river valley and along the bluffs. River Park Occupying a large wedge-shaped piece of land bounded by the relocated Shepard Road and the bank of the Mississippi, River Park is the terminus of a public causeway leading down from the city center, linked by bicycle and walking paths to Crosby Farm Park and Minneapolis upstream and Pigs Eye Lake and the metro waste water treatment plant downstream. The goal of River Park will be to provide linkages —new connections between the City of Saint Paul and the river that is its reason for existence, between the historical industries that lined the river's edge and the neighborhoods that grew up around them, between park visitors and the full meaning of the place that they are exploring. River Park will bring visitors almost to the point of getting their feet wet in the river; a series of scale maps and reliefs might help visitors see that they are standing on the river's Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 9 The Education Center will be built and operated by the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. A professional staff of National Park Service educators will provide programming at the Center. The Science Museum of Minnesota will provide registration and booking services. The Science Museum and Saint Paul Parks and Recreation will be major programming partners. Other possible partners include commercial boat operators, educational institutions, and not -for -profit neighborhood groups. Programs will be offered individually by these groups or by two or more in partnership. The programs offered will all be educational programs relating to the Mississippi River and MNRRA's interpretive themes. Many programs will charge a fee; others will not. Another major use of the center will be for community meetings, workshops, conferences, and seminars related to the river. Programs at the Education Center are generally aimed at combining indoor instruction with use of "classrooms" located outdoors along the river and in the parks. Since the focus is on the river, almost all of these programs will originate in the open water season between April and November. To enhance its identity as a site for Mississippi River education, the Education Center should be connected to the greatest extent possible by proximity and line -of -sight with the river. MNRRA education staff will be housed within the Mississippi River Education Center but the Administrative headquarters for MNRRA will continue in leased space. Listed below are sample programs that could be offered at the Education Center. Guided Programs on the Mississippi River Participants in these programs would explore different aspects of the river. Trips ranging from one hour to day -long would begin with orientation and instruction in the Education Center followed by on -river experiences from the Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park Dock. Transportation would be provided by commercial boat operators and other private boat owners. Program hosts: MNRRA, SMM, & other partners. Guided Programs to Lilydale, an urban wilderness At the Education Center, these programs would start with orientation and indoor instruction. They would then move to outdoor classrooms at the quarry, flood plain forest, and reclaimed residential area. Program hosts: MNRRA, Saint Paul Parks, & other partners. Mississippi River Science These two hour boat trips offer hands-on-leaming experiences that will foster in student participants a sense of awareness of river ecosystems and connectedness with the river environment. Through interactive learning stations, students organized into cooperative groups will learn first hand about the geological origins of the Mississippi River, learn to identify the principal riverine ecosystems and some of the plants and animals that live in them, monitor the river's health, and learn about current issues related to the river and its watersheds and what we can do about them. Structured learning experiences in the Education Center complement the time on the river. For grades 4.8. Program hosts: MNRRA, SMM, commercial boat operator, & other partners. National Parks Educational Sampler A few of the best education programs from 369 National Park Areas would be offered at the Education Center. These programs would be related to the MNRRA themes and would change yearly. This would offer participants a chance to learn about other National Park areas. Program host: MNRRA. Eye on the Mississippi The Education Center would be a staging area for this program that is connected to exhibits in the Mississippi River Gallery. Volunteers would take daily research trips on the river. The Education Center would be used as a place to process data collected, prepare samples, and store equipment. Program host: SMM. Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 11 Weekend Youth and Family Workshops/Field Trips Each weekend, special family programs would be offered at the Education Center that would incorporate the broad range of river topics of interest to the general public. Sample programs include "Fossil Findings for Families," "Mississippi River Tales," and "Ancient Peoples of the Mississippi — An Archaeological Field Trip." These would be fee -based programs. Program hosts: SMM & MNRRA. Mississippi River Institute for Teachers This two -week, graduate level, institute would bring together environmental educators, university researchers, and elementary/middle school teachers for a summer institute to explore river -based curricular materials, current environmental/ecological research and issues impacting the Mississippi and other river systems, as well as river studies drawn from literature and the arts. The River Institute would be based at the education facility with field trips to research sites and other educational/laboratory facilities as needed. National funding would be sought for this project. Program hosts: SMM, MNRRA, & one or more institutional partners, including Hamlin University's Center for Global Environmental Education and the University of St Thomas. Tri-Rivers Leadership Development Camp This three-week youth camp would enable young people in Minnesota to learn about and develop educational projects focusing on the ecological and environmental issues and concerns regarding the St Croix, the Mississippi, and the Minnesota rivers. The camp would foster increased and active youth stewardship of Minnesota river systems through involving its participants in experiential environmental education activities related to these three river systems. For three weeks each summer, up to 30 high school students from throughout Minnesota (perhaps the region) would camp and learn together in various locations around the state using the three rivers as "outdoor laboratories." Camp participants would study the natural and current physical conditions of these three water resources and would be trained in water monitoring techniques. Rural and urban site visits to industries (agriculture, business, and recreation) that are dependent upon and influence each of the three watersheds would also be at the core of the daily programming. The camp would use the Mississippi River Education Center for its base and would spend approximately one of the three weeks around or at the education center. The camp would be developed and offered initially through a grant, but would be structured to become a self-supporting camp. Program hosts: SMM, MNRRA, & other partners. Riverboat Rendezvous This summer event aims to reveal the economics and lifestyle of river commerce. Towboats, barges, paddlewheelers, and other boats would converge on Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. The public would get a chance to meet and talk with pilots and deckhands during a visit. Many of the boats would be open for a tour; exhibits would link the boat to the economy of the river. Programs of river music, skills, and stories would be provided. The Education Center would be open to the public with special exhibits and programs. Program hosts: MNRRA, SMM, Saint Paul Parks, commercial boat operators, & other partners and sponsors. Summer River Fest Each summer SMM and MNRRA would plan and host a major river festival that would span both sides of the Mississippi. The Celebration Plaza at the riverfront museum would be one performing stage with the Education Center offering a variety of drop -in mini classes, lectures, demonstrations, and exhibits. Program hosts: SMM, MNRRA, City of Saint Paul, & other partners and sponsors. 0 0 0 Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 13 Comparison of MNRRA Costs and Attendance Table 1 summarizes estimated construction, staffing, operating costs, and attendance for the interpretive center concept as described in the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan and three other possible scenarios involving a partnership with the Science Museum. Cost estimates were made by comparing the size and functions of the facilities in each scenario with the Interpretive Center proposed in the plan and with other facilities built by the National Park Service (NPS). These are rough estimates developed by the NPS that will need to be revised after additional design work is completed. The attendance estimates for the Mississippi River Education Center were made by comparing it to similar facilities in the Twin Cities and in other NPS areas. Attendance estimates for the Mississippi River National Center and for the Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery were provided by the Science Museum based on past attendance at SMM. Detail on the scenarios in Table 1 is provided in Tables 2 — 5. In all scenarios, the following two components would be located in the new Science Museum of Minnesota (SMM). • Mississippi River National Center • Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery The location and design of the two major components described below varies with each of the scenarios. • Mississippi River Education Center • MNRRA Headquarters Scenario #1: MNRRA Headquarters and 3500 gross square foot Mississippi River Education Center combined into one facility. Scenario #2: A 3500 gross square foot Mississippi River Education Center located within Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. MNRRA Headquarters would remain in leased space in Saint Paul. Scenario #3: A 6700 gross square foot Mississippi River Education Center located within Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park. The expanded education center includes a large room for community -related meetings, programs, and drop4n visitors; a room for resource access through the World-wide Web; and a room in which MNRRA, SMM, Saint Paul Parks, and other partners' staff and volunteers can prepare for their programs. Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 15 Table 2: Cost of MNRRA components in the new Science Museum of Minnesota Component Size Construction Operating Notes Cost Cost/year Mississippi River 2,000 sf $300,000 $65,000 Leased from SMM with National Center NPS completing the interior construction and furnishing the space. Mississippi River 2,500 sf $1,000,000 (to $54,000 Exhibits funded by NPS Exhibition build exhibits in will be integrated with an Gallery exhibits cooperation additional 2500 square feet with the SMM) of Mississippi River exhibits funded by the SMM. Total of 5,000 square feet of Mississippi River exhibits at SMM. Subtotal 4,500 sf $1,300,000 $119,000 Design Costs $260,000 Not Design costs are 20% of Applicable exhibit cost and of interior construction cost. Total in SMM 4,500 sf $1,560,000 $11%000 Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 17 Table 4: Cost for Scenario #2 Mississippi River Education Center at Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park, Headquarters remains in leased space Component Size Construction Operating Notes Cost Costs/year Mississippi River 3,500 gross $1,100,000 $33,100 Two classrooms. Education square feet Multipurpose audit - Center orium space for 75. Wired for connection to the Internet. Headquarters 7,000 sf 0 $115,000 7,000 sq. feet leased at current rate. Headquarters Not $ 75,000 Not Very rough estimate Furnishings Applicable Applicable to outfit remaining offices in leased space. Education Center Not $ 10%000 Not Rough estimate. Furnishings Applicable Applicable Landscape Not $ 202,000 Not Available Decreases as size of development/ Applicable building decreases. site prep. Utility connect. Not $ 14,000 Not Same as in CMP. Applicable Applicable Parking 33 car/bus $ 126,000 Not For education center Applicable only. Subtotal N.A. $12617,000 $148,100 Survey/Design $ 404,000 Not Applicable Totals 10,500 sf $2,0212000 $1489100 Total in SMM 4,500 sf $11560,000 $11%000 (from Table 2) Grand Totals 15,000 sf $31581,000 $267,100 Scenario #2 Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 19 Attendance Estimates To assist in understanding now various partnership scenarios would affect attendance, projections for various NPS facilities within Harriet Island/Lilydale Regional Park and within the Science Museum were prepared. The attendance estimates for the Mississippi River Education Center were made by comparing it to similar facilities in the Twin Cities and in other NPS areas. Attendance estimates for the Mississippi River National Center and for the Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery were provided by the Science Museum based on past attendance at SMM. Table 6 summarizes attendance projections. Interpretive Center/Ilead- quarters on Harriet Island as described in the Compre- hensive Management Plan Scenario 1: Mississippi River Education Center and Head- quarters on Harriet Island; Mississippi River National Center and Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery in SMM Scenario 2: Mississippi River Education Center on Harriet Island; Headquarters remains in leased space; Mississippi River National Center and Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery in SMM Scenario 3: Mississippi River Education Center with offices for education staff on Harriet Island; Headquarters remain in leased space; Mississippi River National Center and Mississippi River Exhibition Gallery in SMM Interpretive Mississippi Mississippi Mississippi Total Center & River River River Attendance Head- National Exhibition Education quarters Center Gallery Center 30,000- 50,000 X I X 30,000- 50,000 X 300,000 — 1,000,000 16,000 — 1,016,000 — 400,000 247000 1,024,000 X 30%000 — 1,0001000 16,000 — 11016,000 — 400,000 24,000 1,0249000 X 300,000 — 1,000,000 28,000 — 1,028,000 — 400,000 40,000 1,040,000 Science Museum of Minnesota Mississippi National River & Recreation Area Proposal of Partnership page 21 of course someone has to operate the lock and dam. Do you all know enough about river navigation to ensure safe and swift movement of boat traffic up and down the river? Also around the pilot house are other boats. An old birch bark canoe helps tell the story of the archaeological sites along the Upper Mississippi and what we have come to know about the people who lived in this area as long 12,000 years ago. You rummage through the beaver pelts and other items in the belly of a voyageur canoe and ponder the role of the river in the fur trade that first brought Europeans to this part of the country. A portion of a keelboat helps tell the story of European migration and displacement of native peoples in this part of the country. You see a large crowd gathering over at the River Lab and stroll over. A volunteer river monitor has just arrived from her morning survey of the Mississippi River in downtown Saint Paulin the Science Museum's lab boat, The River Eye. She begins to set out the things she collected: A sample of beaver musk — she asks how many knew that beavers swim the river here in downtown Saint Paul? Video footage of a Great Blue Heron flying overhead— how many are aware of the large heron rookery only two miles away? A water sample from a storm sewer outflow — how many realize what happens to the water that runs down their streets after a rain? People crowd in to touch, smell, and see all that she has to offer. At another lab window, you try your hand at purifying Mississippi River water. Taking a fresh sample of river water, you pass it through various filters and mix in appropriate chemicals. The end product is a cup of clear water for you to drink. Is it safe to drink? What contaminants are easy for conventional water treatment to remove, which are more difficult? You take a sip as you contemplate all the millions of people that depend on this river for all of their household water needs. After your encounter with the River Lab, you decide to discover more about the forces that shaped the Mississippi River. In particular, you are intrigued by a computer simulation that allows you to move freely back and forth through the past 10,000 years in Saint Paul to see how the river channel has responded to changing geologic and climatic forces. Then you roll up your sleeves and try your hands at shaping a river in a stream table. Increase or decrease the flow of water, raise or lower the slope of the topography, install and/or remove dams and levees — under what circumstances do rivers meander, what are flood plains, where is the fastest water in a river channel? Near the stream table is an incredibly detailed large satellite image of the watershed of the Upper Mississippi River. With the aid of an associated computer program, you get an opportunity to really grapple with the concept of what is a watershed. With the click of a mouse, you can fly over the entire watershed and visit particular points of interest. You can make it rain over a portion of the watershed and watch the water run off the land and begin its journey downstream. You realize that even though you live on land all your actions eventually have an effect on the river. After the stream table and watershed map, you realize that hydrology does not need to be inscrutable and actually is fun, but now it is time to discover more about Mississippi River ecology. Along the windows with their panoramic views of the river are several luxuriant grow boxes. One grow box highlights native prairie plants as would have been found on the bluff lands above the river. A series of grow boxes recreate the cyclical life of a river backwater and the importance of varying water levels on riverine ecology. As you stand over the grow boxes, you wonder what the area outside the windows once looked like and turn your attention to a flip book in front of one of the windows. Maps, oId photographs, historical first person accounts allows you to flip through time. You hear the sound of bird songs and decide to investigate. Nearby under the canopy of a flood plain forest in the spring, you look up and notice songbird species that move up CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS April 4, 1996 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Terry Blum, Parks Leadperson SUBJECT: March Monthly Park Status Report The following maintenance activities were completed by the Parks crew during the month of March. Finished trimming trees along our pedway system. " Started trimming tree in parks. * Work on spring startup of equipment. Prepare equipment for summer. (Change over winter to summer) * Clean out cul-de-sacs after snow storm. TB: kkb ACTIVITY REPORT - MENDOTA HGTS PARKS Reporting Period: 03/01/96 to 03/31/96 INCIDENTS: DATE TIME LOCATION )3/13/96 20:29 KENSINGTON PARK gESCRIPTION: OTHER PARKING COMPLAINTS