Loading...
1989-11-14 Parks and Rec Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA November 14, 1989 - 7:00 P.M. Large Conference Room 1. Call to order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of October 24th Minutes. 4. Verbal Updates: a. Referendum Summary b. Barton-Aschman c. Sibley d. Mendakota e. Recruitment of New Parks Commissioner f. Friendly Hills Tot Lot g. Parks Commission Bylaws h. Valley View Heights Park 5. on Wheel Trail - Bike Trail Referral from City Council - 7:30 P.M. 6. Parks Referendum - Guy Kullander a. Ivy Park Land Acquisition b. Play Equipment Base Material c. Friendly Hills Park Storm Sewer Improvement d. Handicap Access e. Collapsible Outfield Fences f. Trails - Plans and Specifications g. Somerset School Bike Trail h. Landscape Improvements i. Victoria Park's Design 7. Adjourn. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, OCTOBER 24, 1989 A special meeting of the Mendota Heights Park and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, October 24, 1989 in the City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Commission Chair John Huber called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. The following members were present: Damberg, Huber, Katz, Lundeen and Spicer. Lachenmayer was excused. Absent: Owens. Staff members present were Parks Project Manager Kullander and Administrative Assistant Batchelder. Dave Ayers and John Nowlin were in the audience. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Spicer minutes of October Chair Huber seconded. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Lundeen minutes of September Spicer seconded. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 UPDATE ON CONSULTANT SELECTION moved approval of the 10, 1989. Commission moved approval of the 12, 1989. Commissioner Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander gave a brief update on the progress of the contract being worked out between the City and Barton- Aschman. Kullander stated that the City Attorney and Barton-Aschman should have the details worked out soon and that as soon as the Council has awarded the contract, he will let commence the design work for Victoria Highlands Neighborhood Park and the landscape design work Hagstrom-King, Ivy Hill and Rogers Lake parks. Kullander stated that the City was beginning negotiations with Mendakota after receiving its appraisal. He stated the city 's appraiser had valued the land at $583,000, which included $100,000 in current assessments. / Administrative Assistant Batchelder stated that the City Council had agreed to appoint a five member committee to negotiate with the School District on the Sibley site, if it was AYES: NAYS: phase it is apparent that they are high and that there is little room to maneuver within the budget. Commissioner Spicer made a motion to advise the committee working on the negotiations with Mendakota that they realize the budget is tight and that any contingency monies are extremely limited. Commissioner Damberg seconded. Parks Project Manager Kullander inquired of the Commission that if City Council approves the contract with Barton-Aschman, should the City staff release the work listed in the contract and discussed earlier. Commission Spicer stated that he believes it to be a priority to begin this work. Commission Chair Huber polled the Commissioners and they were in unanimous agreement that this work should be released. CURLEY TOT LOT Parks Projec about what dedicated to Heights was to t Manager Kullander inquired the $4,000 in enhancements the tot lot in Valley View be spent on. Dave Ayers, Valley View Heights resident and representative, stated that the neighborhood wanted landscaping that included regrading, black fill dirt, removal of large rocks/debris, sodding and seeding and some shrubs or trees towards the back of the park. Kullander and Ayers discussed the enhancements including signs, picnic benches, bike racks, fencing, benches, fitness stations, open areas, and cautionary measures to keep children from sliding in the winter. Mr. Ayers prioritized the enhancements as: 1. Split rail fence to define the front and side. 2. Minimal landscaping. 3. Picnic benches. 4. Bike rack. Kullander stated that fixing the drainage problem would come out of the Parks maintenance budget, as well as the picnic Commissioner Lundeen seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 SUPPLIERS OF PLAY / EQUIPMENT Parks Project Manager Kullander explained that he was in contact with five suppliers of play ground equipment and that they had all stipulated the City should give them a price and they would design an optimum set .of play equipment for that price. Kullander explained that this was a favorable situation for the City because it would eliminate a competitive bid situation and that each supplier would give a little extra in the hopes of getting more parks. Kullander explained that this also saves the City on contingency as we only have to design limited specifications and the play equipment companies incur most of the design costs. Kullander asked the Parks Commission for direction in the type of base material they would like to have with the play equipment. He explained the differences in sand, pea gravel and rubber matting and how they affect liability issues. Kullander discussed the play equipment specifications with the Commission. Commission Chair Huber requested that the Commission be given a range of materials to consider, from wood to metal. Members of the Commission expressed that the new structures should blend in with existing parks and did not desire brightly colored units. The Commission agreed that some accent color would be acceptable but "loud" or "brassy" colored units were not desireable. The Commission also stated that the play equipment should deliver to the whole range of kids, from toddlers to 12 year olds. The Commission reached consensus that only $17,500 should be specified as a price for the play structures in each park. Kullander stated that originally the Citizens Park Review Committee had budgeted $20,000 plus $4,000 in contingency for each play structure. He inquired if it was the the trail or storm sewer it seemed appropriate that money from sale of Friendly Hills Tot Lot could be used for these two items. Vallev Park The need for outfield fence and field improvements were discussed. The locating of the new play structure is difficult due to the limited amount of space. Removing of trees along Marie and filling in of the existing ditch were discussed as a way to get additional area. Locating a halfcourt basketball court will be difficult due to limited space. It was determined that this use could be eliminated from this park since a court will be built at both Marie and Victoria Parks which are both less than a half mile away. Ivy Hills Park Three location possibilities exist for the new play structure. A trail will connect to Butler on the north and Maple Park on the south. Exact alignment will be determined once the play structure is located. The half court basketball can be built in the south portion of the park, as well as, additional off-street parking. Staff was instructed to make contact with the Ivy Hills and Ivy Falls homeowners association to see if they were still interested in the City acquiring the open space adjacent to the park. This area could be developed as a permanent soccer field which would allow fencing and other improvements be made to existing play field. additional landscaping improvements are also planned. Wentworth Park Paving of the parking lot and drive would not be done now. Once location of the new play structure was selected the siting of the halfcourt basketball pad would be done. Existing bituminous trails will be widened to 8 feet and new trails would connect to 1st Avenue and to Wentworth Trail. Additional landscaping improvements will be determined later. FRIENDLY MARSH PARK S NERMAN WINTHROP ROBERT R NSTINE THOMAS J. SEXTON RICHARD A. NOEL ROGER 0. GORDON EVEN C.TOUREK HART KULLER DAVID P. PEARSON TNOMAS M HART W w RROA C.KNUTSON W 0. ALTMAN WENDv ILLSON LEGGE MARK J. BRIOL GIRARD P. MILLER MICHELE D AILLANCOURT MARY M. COLLINS JONJ. HOGANSON ALAN L. DWORSKY JAY R. NAFTZGER VJINTHROPI WEINSTINE & SEXTON ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW IGOO CONWED TOWER (612)292-8110 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAU LI MINNES OTA 55101 April 19, 1983 ( Mr-. (lrvil Johnson nlLllinistrator ?Iundota Heights eh Plaza Drive tlendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 APR "9 19193 Re: The following described property situated in Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota: Lots 3, 9, 10 and 11 in Block 18, Friendly Hills Re- arrangement. Dear Orvil: You have inquired as to the right of the City of Mendota Heights to dispose of the above property which is commonly referred to as the Friendly Hills "Tot -Lot." Hie property in question is in the name of the City of Mendota Heights. According to our information, at the time of the filing of the Friendly Hills Rearrangement Plat, a Declaration setting forth certain covenants and restrictions was also filed which provided that this property was to be used for a "play- ground area or for development as a school location or for a public park or for other public uses or purposes, all as may be permitted under the zoning ordinances of the Village of Mendota Heights, Minnesota." The formal Declaration provides that the covenants and restric- tions continue for a twenty-year period and then are auto- matically renewed for successive five-year periods unless at least 65 percent of the owners of the lots in Friendly Hills Rearrangement agree to their cancellation or modification. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO August 28, 1989 TO: Citizen's Parks Review Committee File FROM: Kevin Do W , City Administrator SUBJECT: Documentation of Final Cost Allocations The final meeting of the Citizeatswhichstimelthe Committee was held on June 5, 19899F ram of park improvements Committee adopted a recommended program to the City Council. This recommendation was subsequently passed by the voters endorsed by the City Council, and set the financial parameters for the bonuriosee fhich thiswag memo is to document for on August 15th. The purpose the various the file the allocation of those dollars among parts of the project. $ Existing Parks - 300,000250,000 — New Neighborhood Parks - 700,000 Trails - 450,000 (; Centex Development - 125,000- Sibley Land Purchase - 325,000 Sibley Development - 0,000 Mendakota Park Ballfield - 550,000 (` Third Ballfield Location - Sub -total $2,700,000 Allocation for future $ 700,000 Development Total $3,40 00 00 * Existing neighborhood parks were originally budgeted for $250,000. An additional $50,000 was added at the June 5th meeting for the purpose of re -grading ball fields in all of the..existing neighborhood parks. KDF:kkb COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Nineteen (19) members of the Committee met on Monday, June 5th to consider options and make a recommendation. (Minutes of the meeting are attached.) After extensive discussion it was decided to recommend that the City hold a parks bond referendum on a Tuesday in August, and that the ballot question consist of two parts. The first question would be for $2.7 million, and would fund the following improvements: 1. Upgrade of 7 existing neighborhood parks and Curley tot lot 2. Development of three new neighborhood parks - Haegstrom-King, Mendakota, and Victoria Highlands 3. Construction of 15 miles of additional pedestrian/bicycle trail 4. Development of the 27-acre "Centex" park, with the land dedicated by the developer 5. Development of the Sibley campus site in conjunction with School District 197, if and when an agreement with the District is reached. 6. Bond authorization for acquisition of a third ballfield at some time in the future when a preferred location is determined. A second question in the amount of an additional $700,000 would provide bond authorization for the development of the third ballfield site, and for future acquisition of additional land for open space and/or general parks purposes. We have check with bond counsel at Briggs and Morgan, and learned that the second question cannot be made contingent on the first. The attached resolution reflects their recommendation for how the ballot should be worded. �X M� pACT City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy has calculated the expected tax impact (beginning in 1991) on various priced houses in the community. The tax impact shown in the second column for the first question of $2.7 million includes the assumption that the City will increase its annual operating budget for parks maintenance by $100,0000 City of .�.,,►.� Mendota Heights NEWS RELEASE - Citizen's Parks Review Committee Recommends Summer Referendum Date - June 7, 1989 For Immediate Release Contact - Kevin Frazell, City Administrator 452-1850 The Citizen's Parks Review Committee, a 27-member ad hoc advisory committee, has recommended that the City hold a parks bond referendum on a Tuesday in August, 1989. The referendum, as recommended, would consist of two questions. The first question, for $2.7 million, would be used to immediately upgrade and expand the city's parks system. The second question, for an additional $700,000 would provide latitude for the City to acquire additional park land as it becomes available in the community. The Parks Review Committee was appointed by the City Council late last year, with the charge to come up with a parks bond referendum that would meet Mendota Height's parks and open space needs while being financially feasible for the taxpayers. The Commmittee, consisting of Councilmembers, Planning and Parks Commissioners, and at -large citizens, has lie been meeting for over five months to work out the details of the current proposal. The first ballot question of $2.7 million would upgrade the City's existing seven neighborhood parks, complete development of three new neighborhood parks, add 15 miles of bicycle/pedestrian trails, develop a 27-acre community ballfield complex in the southeastern part of the City, 1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN 55118 452.1850 ,PARKS A14D RECREATION COMMISSION. Establishment and Composition. An advisory Commission of Parks and Recreation is hereby established. The Commission shall advise the Village Council on matters pertaining to Parks and Recreational development pro roem grains and is to cooperate with Village personrams.guiding in implementing the Parks and Recreation p g The Commission shall.consist of 7 residents of the Village appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the majority of the members of the Village Council. The members shall serve terms nd of 2 years begining the first ofFebruary he termsrofnsuchtmembelrs January 31st of the following Ye shall be staggered so that the terms of 3 members shall expire one year and four members expiring the following year. A member whose term of office expires shall serve until a successor is appointed. ' During the organizational meetingv(the meeting in February) the Commission shall elect, from among its members, a Chairman who shall serve a term of 1 year and who shall not serve more than two consecutive 1 year terms. The Commission shall also appoint a secretary who may or may not be a member of the Com- mission. DU'PI1;S AIdU 12LSPONSI}3ILI'PIES. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall advise the Village Council on the establishment of written rules and regulations for the use, management and operation of the public recreational facilities, the same to be approved by actions of Council before being put into effect. The Co�mnission shall prepare plans for the development and improvement of the public parks and recreational facilities and may, with respect to the Councils wishes, develop a Comprehensive plan for future park developments. The Parks andeRacreation CoCapital imm mission may, with consent of the Council, E p priorities provemen'ts program for the pourpose of determining P and apportioning costs of scheduled imtemeaforementioned duties ntsw The Commission shall, in preforming aand responsibilities, exhibit the initative in formulating policies which will be responsive to the anticipated need and objectives of the community. Peetings. ularl. established and To hod monthly meetings at a time regcc alymeetings as approved b.Ythe Council and to hold such .p- } necessary for the conduct of business. a true Re uq fired Reportse g p of all Po report to the Council, submiother appropriate reports minutes, financial requests and any �C L,C-1 L� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONTRACT FOR PARK DEVELOPMENT This Agreement, made and entered into this 6th day of September, 1988, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota (hereinafter called the "City") and Valley View Heights Civic Association, Inc. (hereinafter called the Association). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Association has requested the City to provide for playground improvements on Lot 10, Block 1 of Curley's Valley View Addition located at the intersection of Cullen Avenue and Timmy.Street and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to prepare the lot for construction of playground equipment by the Association and to provide up to $4,000.00 toward the cost of the equipment subject to the Association maintaining it. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two parties as follows: 1. The City will grade the lot according to the attached plan dated June 1, 1988. Grading will be completed by approximately October 15, 1988. 2. The City will extend the culvert through the park, approximately 175 feet. 3. The City will sod high traffic and erodible areas and or seed the remaining areas. The City will also provide pea rock in the area designated for the playground structure. 4. The Association will select the play structure to be installed subject to the City's approval. The City will purchase the play structure with the city's costs to be limited to $4,000.00I any additional cost will be paid by the Association. The City reserves the right to approve the location of any structures and the City will coordinate the installation of the equipment with the installers. 5. The Association will perform all routine maintenance on the park including, but not limited to lawn mowing, weeding, fertilizing, and routine upkeep of the equipment. 6. The City will provide liability insurance for itself and will have the Association named as an Additional Insured on the City's insurance policy. The Association will annually reimburse the City for the additional premium attributed to the additional Insured provision. 7. In the event that the Association initiates litigation based on or arising out of this agreement, including an action seeking specific performance, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reimbursement from the non -prevailing party of all costs and expenses including attorney's fees incurred in connection with such litigation. 8. For all purposes under this agreement, written notice to the City shall be addressed to the City of Mendota Heights C/o City Administrator at its City Hall address, notice to the association shall be addressed to the last known president of the Association at his residential CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 8, 1989 To: Parks and Recreation Commissioners From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant Subject: Wagon Wheel Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail DISCUSSION At the October 21, 1989 City Council meeting there was an assessment hearing for the residents of Wagon Wheel Trail to discuss street, storm sewer and curbing improvements. Construction of a bicycle trail was included in this project as Municipal State Aid (MSA) funding would pay for it as part of the street improvement package. The residents were opposed to assessments for these improvements, but felt that if there was other funding available to pay for the bike trail portion of the improvements they would be in favor of constructing a bike trail. City Council referred this matter to the Parks and Recreation Commission to explore Park funding options for the bike trail. Construction of the bike trail independently of MSA funding would cost $134,500, including contigencies, overhead, and design costs. MSA funding is not available for the bike trail unless it is part of the whole street improvement package. The Citizens Park Review Committee did not allocate any money for trails along Wagon Wheel Trail, as they felt that it was not fiscally practical to pay the costs of the bike trail when MSA money is available to do so. ACTION REQUIRED Staff expects that some Wagon Wheel residents may attend the Park meeting to hear discussion on this matter. Conduct the meeting with the Wagon Wheel residents about possible funding for the bike trail and make any appropriate recommendations to City Council. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 7, 1989 TO: Park and Recreation Commission FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Ivy Park Additional Land Acquisition Several years ago, the Ivy Falls Townhomes Association approached the City to see if we were interested in acquiring an open area of land (approximately 2 to 3 acres) adjacent to Ivy Park. This land cannot be developed for housing but must remain as open space. The four homeowners associations apparently pay taxes on this area plus any maintenance costs. I contacted Mr. Ralph Ogen of the Ivy Falls Townhomes Association who said that his 36 members were in favor of releasing the property but the homeowners associations for Ivy Keep I and Ivy Keep II, whose units abut the parcel in question, were opposed because of no assurances as to how the land would be used. I feel that if we were to acquire this parcel it could be developed into a permanent youth size soccer field. The existing ballfield/soccer play field could then be improved for softball use only with improvements similar to those installed at the City Hall Site. Action Reouired Discuss this matter with the Parks Project Manager, and if the Parks and Recreation Commission desire to implement this, direct staff to prepare a sketch plan or letter describing the proposed development of the site, to present to the Homeowners Association. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO NOVEMBER 7, 1989 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Play Structure Base Materials I have contacted the City's Insurance Risk Analyzer to get clarification of terms used to describe base materials. Pea Rock or Gravel is from 3/8" to 5/8" in size Coarse sand or Buck -Shot is from, 1/16" to 1/8" Pea Rock can also be ordered in 1/8" to 3/8" size Washed sand is what is used in most concrete products. We will be using either washed sand (what was originally put around existing play structures) or the Buck -Shot or coarse sand measuring 1/16" to 1/8" in size. The advantage of the Buck -Shot over washed sand would be that vegetation cannot take root in Buck -Shot and animals are less likely to soil this material. It also does not compact when wet as regular sand will. Action Reouired For information purposes only. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS fui�15(�] NOVEMBER 7, 1989 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Friendly Hills Park Storm Sewer Enlarging and improving the soccer/softball play field in Friendly Hills Park was a desired improvement recommended by the Citizens Parks Review Committee. To accomplish this would require a storm sewer pipe through the park replacing the current drainage ditch/way to the pond. The engineering department has surveyed the area and estimated a storm sewer would cost approximately $13,500 plus $3,500 for contingencies and engineering. The amount budgeted by the Referendum Parks Committee to improve the play field was $5,000 plus additional funding from a pool of $50,000 to be used to improve play fields in four parks. (Ivy, Wentworth, Valley and Friendly Hills Parks). Because the construction cost is less then $15,000 we are not required to advertise for bidders, but can solicit bids from at least three contractors who have previously worked for the city or include this work with a larger contract. Action Required If the Parks and Recreation Commission desires to implement this improvement, they should request that council order preparation of plans and specifications to replace the drainage ditch in Friendly Hills Park with a storm sewer pipe as recommended by the engineering staff. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 7, 1989 TO: Park and Recreation Committee FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Handicap Accessibility of Park Facilities Federal and State laws require that all publicly financed facilities be designed to accommodate handicap individuals. To address this situation I recommend the Park Commission establish a policy requiring any park improvements to be handicap accessible. As part of the trail improvements we will be providing curb cuts whenever necessary as well as adjusting the level of all foot bridges to match the level of the adjoining trails. Consideration of a trail from the parking areas to the half court basketball courts would seem appropriate. Play structures must also be considered. One narrow bituminous path from the edging to the first low ramp of each play structures should be installed. This hard surface must be located so as not to constitute a hazard. Also, at one of the ten locations where play equipment will be installed an additional play structure designed specifically for the handicap should be included. These modifications to accommodate the handicap were not factored into the referendum budgets, but I feel the costs should be very minor in all instances except the one special play structure. This could range in the $15-30,000 area depending on the size of the structure and type of base material used. Action Reouired Review the matter with the Parks Project Manager and discuss potential policies to address Handicap Accessibility. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO NOVEMBER 7, 1989 TO: Park and Recreation Committee FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Collapsible Ball Field Fencing Use of collapsible fencing on the City ball fields was discussed at the October 24th meeting. The product described by members of the commission is called Carsonite Flexible Fence System (see attachment). The primary use of this product is for temporary fencing on play fields with multiple sport uses. To leave this product in place for an entire season would be inviting vandalism. This would be an inviting target to "wreck-reate". Testing how strong it is, or how far it will bend or can it be ripped or even ripped off are obvious "miss -uses." Installation or dismantling would require a work crew several hours per field. If you have ever tried to install or remove a fence post, buried two feet into dry hard ground you can imagine how willing our park crews will be to want to use this product. An average outfield would require 300 feet of 48" fabric and use about 30 posts. The cost for the materials and installation tools would cost approximately $1,500.00 A wire fabric fence 6' high with warning track would cost $6,500.00 installed and last approximately 20 to 30 years. I contacted the City's Insurance Risk Analyzer, Dave Drugg, who had less than a glowing recommendation for this product. It is new and is effective, but he feels that the best and safest fence is a minimum 6' chain link fence with a 10 to 15 foot warning track. He also said the collapsible fence product does not weather well and must be taken down prior to winter. It also "looses its memory" if prolonged stress or distortion is inflected on the product. Action Required For information purposes only. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 7, 1989 TO: Park and Recreation Commission FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Bike Trails Information has been gathered by the engineering staff along the proposed bike trail routes. With this information we can more accurately determine the location, length and construction difficulties we will encounter. In our opinion most if not all of the following trails can be built next year. 1. Valley Park: Marie to Highway 13 2. Valley Park: Marie to Highway 110 3. Highway 110: Crown Point to Dodd Road 4. Marie Avenue: I-35E to Dodd Road 5. Marie Avenue: Dodd to Delaware Avenue 6. Highway 149 R.O.W.: Dodd Road/Highway 110 corner to Decorah 7. Delaware: Highway 110 to Huber 8. Victoria: Lexington to Marie 9. Wachtler/Wentworth: Emerson to Dodd 10. Laura Court: Extended to Somerset School Trail 11. Trails in neighborhood parks: Rogers, Ivy, Marie, Wentworth, Victoria Highlands and Friendly Hills. Action Required If commission concurs with this list they should request that Council order staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 11 trail sections listed above. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 7, 1989 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Guy Aullander, Parks Project Manager RE: Somerset School Bike Trail In 1989, the Park and Recreation Commission approved the construction of a bridge over Ivy Falls Creek and the installation of a bike trail from First Avenue to the Somerset School playground. The referendum recommended an extension of this trail to the north west to connect to Laura Court but did not address a needed section to the East. The trail ends at the playground and would require an extension of approximately 300' to reach the paved area by the school adjacent to Dodd Road. The cost of this segment would be $3,000-5,000. Action Required If the commission desires the link up of the new trail to the on -street trail along Dodd Road it should direct staff to request the school district to construct the trail or to give the city permission to construct the trail. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA October 24, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. Large Conference Room 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Approval of October 12th Minutes. 4. Update on Consultant Selection - Three Large Parks. 5. Presentation by City Park Manger, Guy Kullander: a. Recap Trails. b. Selection of Play Equipment Supplier. C. Neighborhood Park Improvement Discussion. d. Curley and Friendly Hills Tot Lots. 6. Adjourn 1011,18/89 13:27 FAXX612 337'757,' SOO INTERLINE 2002 E • n •{ f rf �I• � 1 �Ia�taa- FRDM. M HIRER "i ��la Ella M • 11l- li-1c t -.- H ; t da la - E I• E - la i 1 1 �1 FI • E 1' � MI 1 1 i 1I • a It• a t E 7 11'' "[•9a-"�- E t 7 1'7p ' N i PI 1' 11 ii f. I' • S •M is .i'-0at � F •E. 11 6� 1 ry 5 i 1 1. i3 ••a • it ! 1 1 71 i" 1 M`i Ia f' I 71taRAMim I•1' [ .. • t ,• a n e. t 1 la last 1 ( 1 E• E i l ! • ( ' • U 1 II '- ''[[� 1. 1 • rl I 7 1 1' �a [ •1 •7 •'E 1 I I MI 41 1• i I '•1 E! 17 WE ABREED TO BE ON THECOMMISSION RE ALL EXPECTED 1 BE ! • Z It I as a '. . •{ C E...E ,Itl I E. • a i' tNOW, • 1 E IT DIMCULT FOR YOU TOATTEND RMMY YOUSal TO REVIEW HOW1 7' AND THE COMMISSIONS CAN 71 THU YOU 1' PARTICIPATION • II I LOOKFORWARD ( IT CONTINUING IN THE1