Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2001-03-07 ARC Agenda Packet
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIItPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA are 7, 2001--Large Conference Room 1. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Welcome to new ARC Commissioner Vern Edstrom 4. Approval of February 14, 2001 Minutes 5. UnSnished and New Business: a. Continued Revision of Airport Noise Video Script 6. Acknowledee Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence: a. Notice of Cancellation of February 27, 2001 MASAC Meeting b. Memorandum from City Administrator Lindberg regarding February 27, 2001 MASAC Municipal Caucus a Invitation to February 27, 2001 Meeting of the MASAC Municipal Caucus d. Letter to Jeff Hamiel, MAC Executive Director from Charles E. Mertensotto, MASAC Chairman dated March 1, 2001 regarding MASAC Dilemma e. Draft November 2000, December 2000, and January 2001 MASAC Technical Advisor's Reports f. Draft November 2000, December 2000, and January 2001 MASAC Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analyses g. Letter to City Administrator Linderg from FAR Part 150 Program Manager John Nelson dated January 26, 2001 h. Notice of February 14, 2001 Meeting of the Aviation Policy Plan Task Force i. Agenda of February 21, 2001 MAC Rescheduled Regular Meeting j. Notice of February 21, 2001 Special Meeting of MAC Planning and Environment Committee k. Notice of March 6, 2001 Regular Meeting of MAC Planning and Environment Committee L February 22, 2001 Briefing on MSP 2010: Building a Better Airport m. Airport Noise Reports Other Comments or Concerns 8. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at (651) 4524850 with requests. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO are 5, 2001 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Welcome to New Airport Relations Commissioner Vern Edstrom and Congratulations to Returning Commissioner John Roszak! Discussion The City Council, at their regulaz meeting on February 6, 2000, appointed Vern Edstrom and re -appointed John Roszak to the Airport Relations Commission. The Commission should congratulate both of them appropriately at the March 7, 2001 Commission meeting. Action Required Congratulate both new Commissioner Vern Edstrom and returning Commissioner John Roszak! CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 2001 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, February 14, 2001, in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Scott Beaty and Commissioners Joe Leuman, Liz Petschel, and Ellsworth Stein. Commissioners John Roszak, Gregg Fitzer and Vern Edstrom were excused from the meeting. Staff present were City Administrator Cari Lindberg and Administrative Assistant Patrick C. Hollister. Mr. Hollister took the minutes. MINUTES Commissioner Leuman moved to approve the January 10, 2001 Minutes with revisions. Commissioner Petschel seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 AIRPORT NOISE VIDEO The Commission reviewed the draft video script provided by Mr. Hollister and recommended revisions. Commissioner Petschel said that former WCCO reporter Dave Nimmer confirmed that he would be willing to lend his voice to the video for a nominal fee, on the condition that he be allowed to "tweak" the language to make it sound better if necessary. Commissioner Petschel added that it would be good to hire a technical writer or professional editor to review and edit the language of the script to make it flow better and to make it more understandable for the general public. Chair Beatty said that at his office he has hired individuals to do that type of editing for $300-$500. Chair Beatty suggested that the Commission should complete the script as far as content is concerned first, and then pay someone up to $500 to polish the script for public presentation. Chair Beatty said that it is also important to have a "fact -checker" for the script to make sure that everything stated in the script is'accurate. Chair Beatty added that the Commission should have a timetable written out for completion of each step in the video -making process to ensure that the project moves along in a timely fashion. Commissioner Petschel recommended that Staff show the MAC Part 150 Video at the next Airports Commission Meeting as an orientation for incoming Commissioner Edstrom and to refresh the other Commissioners' memories on the content of the video. Chair Beaty as Mr. Hollister to write those portions of the video that were assigned tc outgoing Commissioner May (credits, call to action) rather than assign them to incoming Commissioner Edstrom. Chair Beaty said that he was confident that Commissioner Edstrom would make substantial contributions to the video once he gained some familiarity with the air noise issues. Mr. Hollister said that he would also double-check on the MAC's permission to use portions of its video for Mendota Heights' video and try to get that permission in writing. Mr. Hollister also said that he would check on the status of MAC's updated video. RESCHEDULING OF MARCH 14, 2001 MEETING Ms. Gill and Mr. Hollister informed the Commission that neither of them would be available on March 14 and asked the Commission to reschedule the meeting. The Commission decided to reschedule the meeting to March 7. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE The Commission briefly reviewed the following documents: a. January 2001 MASAC Operations Committee Meeting Cancellation Notice b. January 23, 2001 MASAC Meeting Cancellation Notice c. February 9, 2001 MASAC Operations Committee Meeting Cancellation Notice d. Aviation Policy Plan Task Force Agenda for January 17, 2001 e. Letter from Hoffman Homes, Inc. Regarding Augusta Shores Airport Notification, dated January 19, 2001 f. Letter from John Nelson regarding Part 150 Program, dated January 26, 2001 g. News Articles from Chad Leqve, MAC ANOMS Coordinator h. TAC Aviation Committee Meeting Agenda dated January 31, 2001 i. 2000 MASAC Year in Review and Current MASAC Status dated February 2, 2001 j. MAC Notice of Planning and Environment Committee Meeting dated February 13,2001 k. Eagan Airport Relations Commission Agenda for February 13, 2001 1. Articles Submitted by Commissioner Stein in. Airport Noise Reports ADJOURN Motion made to adjourn by Petschel and seconded by Leuman., AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO March 5, 2001 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: Patrick C. Hollister, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Continue Work on Air Noise Issues Video Script Discussion At the February 14, 2001 meeting of the Airports Relations Commission, the Commission reviewed the draft script of the airport noise issues video. The Commissioner recommended numerous revisions to the script, which have been incorporated into the attached draft. Action Required Review the attached script and continue revision of the Airport Noise Issues Video. ®# AIRPORT NOISE ISSUES VIDEO SCRIPT History The Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport has experienced substantial growth in the last fifteen years, now ranking tenth among the busiest commercial airports in the United States. Landings and takeoffs rose from approximately 373,000 in 1985 to 465,454 in 1995. Projections for the year 2001 called for landings and takeoffs. Projections for the year 2005 estimate 1575.3 average daily flight operations which when annualized tota1574,984, As the airport grew in the late 1980's and early 1990's, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, created by the Minnesota Legislature in 1943 to manage area airports, considered the option of developing a totally new airport. Ultimately, a location in southern Dakota County was being considered. Simultaneously, improvements to the existing Minneapolis/Saint Paul International Airport were being considered under the then titled "dual track" planning process. This included the power to construct a new runway if the Metropolitan Airports Commission determined that it was appropriate and reasonable after public hearings. In 1996, the Minnesota Legislature ended the "dual track" planning process by expressly prohibiting the Metropolitan Airport Commission from exerising powers for the purpose of future construction of a major new airport. Further, the Legislature mandated the implementation of a long-term comprehensive plan for the existing Minneapolis/Saint Paul international airport. At the same time, the Legislature mandated that the Commission expend significant sums of money for insulation and air-conditioning of residences, schools, and other publicly owned buildings where there is demonstrated need because of aircraft noise. As a result of this legislation, the existing international airport will be the only major airport in the Metropolitan area to meet the air traffic needs of the region to the year 2020 and beyond. Construction of the new runway has begun with completion scheduled in 2003. Organizations No matter what issues are brought up by the aviation industry the prime consideration by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) is always safety of the system. The FAA is the ultimate authority on all aviation matters in this country. Although most other countries have their own respective agencies, the FAA is the most respected of its type worldwide. Another major focus of the FAA is the promotion of commercial aviation growth. This many times undermines their major purpose of aviation safety, such as in the recent example of the screw jack assembly on the Boeing 737. 4" tJ [Picture of man on tower - too tall]. An interesting comment on the FAA's authority is of a man standing at the top of the Mendota Heights water tower would make that structure too tall and therefore illegal under the FAA's safety rules of flight. The MAC or Metropolitan Airports Commission is the govern ng body of authority for all activities of the airport, which include flight operations, bonding authority, payroll, construction, snow removal, grass mowing and sewer cleaning. The MAC is composed of sixteen members, from the metro azea as well as out -state, to give a balanced opinion. All commissioners are appointed by the governor. Our airport is the only one in the country that is self-sustaining; no taxes are levied by the MAC. The Metropolitan Airports Commission provided this graphic of existing and future airport facilities. North is the top of the graphic. The airport is generally located west of and adjacent to the City of Mendota Heights. As you look at this graphic, please note the two parallel runways designated 12L-30R and 12R-301,. Aircraft departing to the east or arriving from the east utilize these runways and fly over residences and other facilities within the City of Mendota Heights. This figure also shows the new runway that is aligned nearly north and south and located on the west edge of the airport with the designation 17-35. This is the runway now under construction and scheduled for completion in the year 2003. The capacity of the airport to handle additional air traffic will be substantially enhanced with completion of runway 17-35. For residents of Mendota Heights, the construction of runway 17-35 is projected to reduce the percent of operations of aircraft over the City. Residents must understand, however, that the capacity and actual takeoffs and landings at the airport will increase Osteadily in future years. So, while the percentage of operations over the City of Mendota Heights may decrease, the actual number of flights over Mendota Heights may not. [Note: incorporate figures showing actual past percentages of operations on the parallel runways as compared to projected percentages.] According to the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the advent of the jet age in 1960's triggered federal laws to respond to noise issues at large airports. In 1981, federal regulations were adopted to define noise abatement and mitigation efforts at major airports. On April 27, 1987, the Metropolitan Airports Commission approved a comprehensive airport noise compatibility program for the Minneapolis/Saint Paul International Airport. In 1991, that program was updated. In February 1999, a study began to further update that plan. It is now known as the "MSP Part 150 Update", 11 N Part 150 Into the Future On August 22, 2000 MASAC approved the following sound mitigation priorities (in order of priority) as part of the Part 150 Update: 1. Complete the sound insulation of single-family and duplex homes within the 1996 DNL 65 and greater noise contours 2. Complete the sound insulation of multi -family residential structures within the 1996 DNL 65 and greater noise contours in conjunction with priority 3 and then sequencing to 4 below upon FAA approval of the Part 150 Update document. 3. Complete the sound insulation ofsingle-family and duplex homes that fall within the 2005 DNL 65 and greater DNL noise contours 4. Complete the sound insulation of eligible single-family and duplex homes that fall within the 2005 DNL 60 to DNL 64 noise contours 5. Complete the sound insulation ofmulti-family residential structures within the 2005 DNL 65 and greater DNL noise contours in.conjunction with priority 3 above upon FAA approval of the Part 150 Update document 6. Complete the sound insulation ofmulti-family residential structures within the 2005 DNL 60 to DNL 64 noise contours Complete the sound insulation of nursing homes and churches with regular weekday daycare/nursery school programs within the 2005 DNL 60 contour. [Transition Graphic Airport (John)] Corridor The Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor (the Corridor) is an area that contains the Minnesota River and commercial and industrial land immediately east of MSP. The Corridor has the lowest density residential population of any area surrounding MSP. The goal of the Corridor Procedure is to concentrate aircraft overflights over more compatible land use (non-residential), as compared to other areas around MSP. Various adjustments and refinements to the corridor have occurred over the past 30 years. The Preferential Runway System, established in 1969, affirmed the use of the Corridor as the first priority for overflights. Corridor procedures were defined and implemented in 1974, and the existing Corridor Procedures were essentially established in the mid- 1980s. The PRS was replaced by the RUS in 1991. 3 There are many important debates going on regarding the best plan for noise abatement and mitigation as part of the MSP Part 150 Update. Nevertheless, the fact remains that Minnesota, adjacent communities, and the Metropolitan Airports Commission are well ahead of other major metropolitan airports in designing, funding, and actually implementing noise attenuation projects. Fleet Composition Fleet Composition of Jet aircraft at Minneapolis / St Paul airport consist of stage 3 hush kitted and manufacture jet aircraft. The difference you ask? Stage 3 Hush Kit Aircraft are older aircraft that are retrofit to meet the new stage 3 noise levels. Photos of stage 3 hush kitted aircraft/ Stage 3 manufactured aircraft, are newer planes with new technology. They use larger and more powerful engines. These larger aircraft with more powerful engines have lower noise levels than Stage 3 husk kit. Photos of manufactured/ While the transition to Stage 3 is a necessary step in the right direction, it's important to point out that it will not solve all our aircraft noise problems. All things considered, we have seen great progress in recent years. However looking into the future, the elimination of hush kitted aircraft and the step into Stage 4 would reduce noise levels even further. Flight Tracks Every time a plane takes off from an airport runway, its departure from the end of that runway is a carefully orchestrated event. AS aircraft leave the runway they follow predetermined paths that are called "flight tracks". It's easier to understand this concept if you can visualize the end of the runway as the hub of a wheel and the flight tracks as the spikes radiating out from that hub. Each airport runway has its own set of flight tracks or "spokes", and pilots are assigned one of these tracks as they prepare for departure on their particular runway. Each flight track is identified by a "degree" reading like the points of a compass. Using another analogy, the flight tracks spread out from the runway like a Chinese fan. In the City of Mendota Heights the flight tracks spread over an area roughly bounded by Hwy 110 on the north and 494 and 35E on the south. As aircraft fly repeatedly through the flight tracks in this area, it becomes relatively easy to identify the air corridor and where the greatest concentration of air noise will occur. Choice of runway and flight track can be determined by a number of factors. One of the most significant determinants is the prevailing wind. Optimal aircraft performance on takeoffs occurs when planes depart into the wind. For that reason, during the wintertime when prevailing winds tend to be out of the north, the majority of departures will occur over Minneapolis. During warm weather months, when the winds come out of the south, more departures will occur over Mendota Heights and Eagan. With warm weather also comes the chance of thunderstorms and severe weather. These factors may also feed into the choice of runway and flight track. During the period from 6:OOam to 10:30pm when the airport is extremely busy, both parallel runways receive maximum use. Planes take off simultaneously from the ends of both runways using pre -assigned flight tracks. This is called simultaneous departures. Because the runways are close together; the aircraft need to be separated by 15 degrees of airspace. This makes the use of flight tracks even more imperative. Primarily during nighttime hours, the tower may move to what is called head -to -head take offs and landings. This means that both ends of the parallel runways over Mendota Heights and Eagan are being used for take -offs AND landings during the same period of time. A plane taking off on the Mendota Heights runway needs a safe separation from a plane landing on the Eagan runway. It's also important to note that head -to -head operations do not occur on the north end of the parallel runways. It's important to note that every plane that arrives at or departs from the airport has its flight track monitored as well as the aircraft noise it generates. Sophisticated tracking and listening devices make this possible. Each month MASAC makes this information available so that aircraft performance and adherence to assigned flight tracks can be evaluated. The cumulative effect of all this technical information is the ability to identify what is called the DNL contour. DNL is an abbreviation for day and nighttime landings. It really refers to the sum total of every aircraft event that occurs over a particular community monitor and the noise it generates. The airport defines daytime as 6:OOam to 10:30pm and nighttime as 10:30pm to 6:OOam. When every flight operation and the noise it generates is grouped cumulatively, flight and noise patterns can be visualized for each neighborhood adjacent to the airport. These patterns or contours reflect the sound decibel levels that communities are exposed to and determine hose households that are eligible for sound mitigation assistance. These contours refer to average noise level rather than to specific incidents. Sound mitigation is an objective that communities, MASAC, MAC and the FAA share in common. One of the positive results from the collaboration between Mendota Heights and these organizations is what is called the crossing -in -the -corridor procedure. One of 5 the flight tracks over Mendota Heights runs primarily over Highway 494. It's very close44 to a similar flight track coming off the Eagan runway. As both of these flight tracks send aircraft primarily over the freeway, it avoids residential areas and is a tremendous source of noise mitigation when it can be used. When the pace of activity is slower at the airport, and particularly during nighttime hours, the tower can now direct aircraft to "crossover" from the end of both runways and fly on this freeway track resulting in a positive noise reduction for residents. An interesting side issue is the "shape" of the fan coming off the Mendota Heights runway as opposed to the Eagan runway. As the airport has become busier over the years and the ends of both parallel runways have become heavily used, fanning patterns and flight tracks over both areas had to be precisely defined. The flight tracks over Mendota Heights resemble a symmetrical fan, but this is not true over Eagan. The fan area is smaller because of an agreement between the airport and the City of Eagan to restrict the amount of fanning that can occur over this area. It's an agreement that took place in the 1970's and is steeped in history and politics. The downside is that there are fewer flight tracks over Eagan which depending on the weather prevailing winds and number of aircraft that need to depart seems to have an inequitable impact in Mendota Heights. Advocacy Runway Use System The Runway Use System is intended to place aircraft and departures into the Eagan - Mendota Heights Corridor to the maximum extent possible. The next priority is to maximize the use of the crosswind runway 94-22) in an effort to reduce traffic from the parallel runways (I IL-29R and 11R-29L) to and from the northwest during light traffic hours. The proposed extension of Runway 4-22 will increase the number of hours the RUS can be used: from a current average of three hours per day to as many as nine hours per day, depending on wind conditions. The RUS consists of the following daytime and nighttime use priorities: Daytime Hours (6:fit) am-10:30pm) • When operations require the use of the parallel runways, a configuration should be selected that will place the majority of traffic in the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor when feasible. • When feasible, maximize the use of Runway 4-22 and balance the use at both ends. • Utilize Runway 4-22 in conjunction with the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor as much as possible. Nighttime Hours 1030 m-6:OOam • Maximize use of the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor (head -to -head) when feasible. • If 4-22 is required, use in a balanced manner. The increased use of Runway 4-22 was not achieved, due to prolonged local issues regarding proposed runway use and the subsequent need to update the Runway 22 Extension FEIS. For the 200 Part 150 Update, this measure will be modified with an updated RUS that includes Runway 17-35. Many people feel that the single most important and consistent airport related issue facing the city of Mendota Heights during the past 10 years is the issue of "Equitable Distribution" of aircraft flying in and out of the MSP airport. Said simply - "we want the noise spread out as equally as possible" or "every community benefiting from the airport should equally share the noise". (1) However, because of the current Runway Use System (RUS) deployed at MSP the area know as (2) the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor receives many more overflights than other communities. Let's take a look at this 2000 Overall MSP Average Runway Use diagram to illustrate this point. (3) (4) As you can see the area to the SE of the airport annually receives (26%) of the departures and (26%) of the arrivals. Compare this to the Minneapolis side of approximately (23%) of the departures and arrivals and one begins to get the picture that operations are not fair. Now take a look at the departures and arrivals over St. Paul and Bloomington. Bloomington receives (3%) of the departures and only (1%) of the arrivals while St. Paul is less than (1%) for both departures and arrivals. Percentages like these lead to concerns about inequitable distribution of aircraft. [MAC graphic of last five years' total.] Now let's look at another aspect of the Runway Use System (RUS) that is unfair to the people of Mendota Heights and other communities to the SE of the airport. (5) Believe it or not the RUS instructs that: Whenever possible - meaning weather conditions permit - that aircraft will depart MSP using the Corridor departing to the SE. (6) To further make our point, the RUS instructs that operations at night be conducted in the Corridor whenever conditions allow. (7) To make matters even more unfair the RUS further instructs that "Head to Head" operations be conducted within the corridor during the nighttime hours of (8) 10:30 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. to further protect the communities to the south, west and north of the airport. (9) What this means is that they are departing and landing within the Corridor at the same time! (10) Now some of you may be thinking that the percentage difference seen on this graphic is not that great between the NW (Minneapolis) and SE (Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor) for departures and arrivals. (11) We must point out that when calculating the r� 14P approximate number of overflights between these percentages we are talking about over �" 15,000 flights per year and a significant number of these overflights are at night! Is this an equitable distribution of aircraft? We don't think so! The ARC and Plan Priorities (12) The Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission is a seven person advisory commission appointed by the Mendota Heights City Council. (13) The Commission advises the City Council on matters pertaining to airport noise and operations. This is accomplished by monitoring proposed airport rules, procedures and programs that impact air noise levels within Mendota Heights. The Commission makes regular recommendations to the City Council on strategies that will mitigate air noise exposure. (Footage of Meeting.) (14) Members also address non -noise related issues arising from increased operations and expansion at MSP. These include land use and airport related economic development in communities adjacent to the airport. (15) The commission annually develops and revises its goals and objectives to help prioritize its efforts to mitigate noise in the community. TO this end, the Commission has defined the following issues as important priorities: 1. (16) Equity of the current runway use system. 2. (17) Sound insulation for homes adversely affected by aircraft noise. 3. Aircraft take -off noise reduction through alternative departure techniques (18) (GPS - uses satellite technology to fly planes through unpopulated areas, (19) elimination of head to head operations, (20) fly planes down the center of the Corridor whenever possible) 4. (21) The accelerated conversion from hushkitted aircraft to the much quieter manufactured Stage III and Stage IV aircraft. 5. (22) The reduction of aircraft operations during the nighttime hours. 6. (23) Define and ensure proper use of the established corridor. 7. (24) Ensure that no new runways will be built that will increase air traffic over any portion of Mendota Heights. 8. (25) Monitor the expansion plans and activities MSP Airport. 9. Support other reasonable efforts to reduce the noise generated by airport operations; i.e. (26) ground run-up enclosures, (27) sound barriers, (28) reduced thrust by departing aircraft, (29 & 30) expansion of noise monitoring technology. VIDEO/STILL PICTURES/AUDIO IMAGES (1) Graphic of RUS planes tracking. (Obtain from MAC) (2) Graphic of Mendota Heights Corridor. (Obtain from MAC of documents we have) (3) See picture (3) for example (I would suggest we find a more current graphic) (4) Video with someone manually showing or pointing to these numbers and runways. (NDC 18) (5) Graphic that portrays the stated RUS priorities for the tower order. (On We and create) (6) Highlight the RUS nighttime operation tower order. (On file and create) (7) Highlight RUS tower order for head to head operations. (On file or create graphic or obtain from MAC) (8) Graphic of 10:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. voluntary nighttime hours. (Create of obtain from MAC) (9) Graphic of how head to head operations are carried out in the Corridor. (Obtain from MAC) (10) Go back to graphic (3). (11) Graphic of total operations with calculations showing what 3% difference results in using real numbers - approximately 15,000 operations annually. (Create) (12) Photo or video of ARC meeting. (NDC18) (13) Brief footage of ARC presentation to City Council. (Tape on file) (14) Video of new runway construction and other airport construction projects. (Obtain from MAC ofNDC18) (15) Still picture of Plan of Action. (NDC18 or MH staff) (16) Graphic showing all runways being used. (Not sure how to do this - any ideas?) (17) Video footage of home insulation project. (Obtain from MAC) (18) Graphic or video footage showing how GPS works. (Obtain from MAC) (19) Graphic or video footage showing how head to head operations look and then X it out (no head to head). (MAC may have this or make our own using NDC18) (20) Graphic of plane tracking down the center of the Corridor. (Obtain from MAC) (21) Video with sound of 727 departing and then same with A320 departing. (Obtain from MAC or create with NDC18) (22) Video of people peacefully sleeping with windows open. (Create with NDC18) (23) Video footage showing airplane photograph of industrial area with some pointing out where planes could fly to avoid residential areas. (MH photo using NDC 18 to film footage) (24) Graphic of Dual track Plan that had the 3`d parallel runway as an alternative. (On file in MH office) (25) Still photo of Part 150 book and still photo of budget of proposed expansion plans for MSP to 2010. (On file in MH office) (26) Video footage of run-up enclosure. (Obtain from MAC) (27) Video footage of a sound barrier. (Obtain from MAC) (28) Video footage of plane taking off away from camera with noise (obtain from MAC) (29) Still Picture ofANOMS monitor (30) Graphic of map showing where the monitors are located (obtain from MAC of from MH file) METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION �P'+ �s s ,ti Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport + 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 22 Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 :t t 6 F Qryt wwOP MEETING NOTICE METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL THE FEBRUARY 27I 2001 MASAC MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED Please refer to the enclosed memos for further information.* *If you prefer not to receive further MASAC-related notices, please contact Melissa Scovronski at 612-726-8141 or at mscovron(�mspmac.org. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affixnative action employer. wwn.mspairport<om Believer Airports: AIRLAKE • ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE •CRYSTAL •FLYING CLOUD •LAKE ELMO •SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN 1 JASAC MEMORANDUM MASAC TO: MASAC FROM: Chad Leqve, MASAC Technical Advisor SUBJECT: Cancellation of February 27, 2001 MASAC Meeting DATE: February 20, 2001 Since the November 28, 2000 MASAC meeting, MAC Executive Director, Jeff Hamiel has met with the airlines in an effort to establish the airline representatives on the Blue Ribbon Panel. Since that time the airlines have stated they will not be appointing representatives to the Blue Ribbon Panel. Although the airlines have stated they will not participate on the Panel, MAC staff remains committed to resolving this issue. Discussions are ongoing in an effort to reestablish a dialogue between the airlines and communities and determine whether an organizational structure could be developed to address the various concerns. As a result of the Panel's status, the February 27, 2001 MASAC meeting is cancelled. Future meeting status and updates on the future of MASAC will be provided as information becomes available. Please note that this notice is with respect to the regularly scheduled MASAC meeting and is not related to the proposed MASAC Municipal Caucus meeting scheduled for the same date. MAC staff has continued the production of the Technical Advisor's Report. The January 2001 Technical Advisor's Reports and Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Reports are available on the Web at www.macaysat.org/MASAC/report_table2.htm1. If you wish to receive a hard copy of the report, please contact Melissa Scovronski by phone at 612-726-8141 or via e-mail at mscovron@mspmac.org. If you have any questions or comments regazding this topic, please contact me at 612- 725-6328. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMORANDUM TO: Airport Relations Commission February 27, 2001 FROM: Cari Lindberg, City Administrator SUBJECT: Meeting of the MASAC Municipal Caucus On Tuesday, February 27a I attended a meeting in Eagan of the MASAC Municipal Caucus. The meeting was called by the MASAC Blue Ribbon panel (Barret Lane, Jill Smith and Jamie Verbrugge). There were about 25 people in attendance including four staff members from the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the future of the MASAC group and all of the implications of the recent withdrawal of the airline participants. The three-hour meeting covered a broad range of topics that ultimately resulted in a series of action points. First, there is a strong interest by the community participants to keep MASAC in existence in some form. There was lengthy discussion on the merits of agreeing that MASAC no longer exists and forming some sort of community caucus to take its place. There are a few drawbacks to this alternative however. There is no guarantee that MAC will recognize this new group, which would leave them without funding or staffing from MAC. A new group will also lose the history and credibility that MASAC has gained over its 32-year existence. The alternative would be to amend the bylaws of MASAC to allow the committee to conduct business without the presence of the airlines. To accomplish this, the Chair of MASAC would call a special meeting to amend the bylaws. The legalities of this alternative are being investigated. Mayor Charles Mertensotto is leading this effort. Second, the group agreed that all of the participating communities should pass a model resolution that reiterates support for the Part 150 program and the continuation of MASAC without the presence of the airlines. Barret Lane will be coordinating this effort. Third, the group agreed that each community should use their political leverage to lobby their MAC representatives for MASAC continuation. The individual communities will undertake this on their own. Fourth, it was agreed that input from MAC staff would be necessary on these issues. What role does MAC see MASAC playing in the future? Would they be willing to recognize and fund an additional organization if it were called something other than MASAC? Finally, during this limbo period in which Lite existence of MASAC is in question everyone agreed that some structure is needed for this group of community representatives. The members of the former Blue Ribbon Panel (Barret Lane, Jill Smith and Jamie Verbrugge) were elected to be the Executive Committee. They will organize the efforts of the organization until which time either the continuation of MASAC is confirmed or another entity is formed altogether. The meeting adjourned with the understanding that another meeting would be called in the next month, whether that is a MASAC special meeting or another meeting of the MASAC community caucus. 'City of Minneapolis City Council Barret W.S. lane Council Member, Thirteenth Ward 350 South 51h S(reet -Room 307 Minneapolis MN 55415-1383 Office (612) 673-2213 Fax 673-3940 TTY 673-2157 M E M O R A N D TO: MASAC Municipal Representatives MASAC Staff FROM: Barret W.S. Lane. Jill Smith Jamie Verbrugge DATE: February 5, 2001 U M RE: Meeting of the MASAC Municipal Caucus Tuesday, February 27, 7:00 -10:00 p.m. Community Room (Second Level) Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road You are invited to a meeting of municipal representatives to MASAC to be held this month on the regular MASAC meeting date. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss whether, in the absence of MASAC, we should meet periodically to discuss and respond to airport -related issues which are of concern to our constituents. For instance, we are all interested in the status of the proposed Part 150 program now pending before MAC. We believe that we should be organized to monitor Part 150 and, if necessary, advocate for it before MAC and FAA. We hope that you can join us on the 27t1n and ask you to bring your ideas about what this group might become and accomplish. www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us Affirmative Action Employer Mar 01 01 05:27p Charles E. Mertensotto (G12) 2?2-4755 p.l ROWLAND & MERTENSOTTO, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW l575 West Seventh Street, Suite 103 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-4122 (651) 222-5589 Fax (651) 222-4755 E-mail: rowland(ia?tcinternet.net CHARGES L•. MERTENSOTTO MELISSA KASPROWICZ, PARALEGAL Mr. Jeff Hamiel Executive Director Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28`h Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55450 RE: Dear Mr. I-Iamiel: March 1, 2001 MASAC Dilemma DEh'NIS W McPARTLIN (oFCOUNSEt) JOHNC. ROWLAND (RETrREO) MASAC's municipal representatives held a spirited three-hour meeting at the Eagan City Hall this past Tuesday evening. Representatives from the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Bloomington, Mendota Heights, Eagan, Burnsville, and Inver Grove Heights were in attendance, with the sign -in sheet likely reflecting additional attending city representatives. I[ was readily apparent throughout the meeting that the public members strongly desire the continuation of MASAC, and build on the knowledge and experience gained in the past two years with being involved in the Part 150 update. U.S. Representative James Oberstar was quoted in the St. Paul Pioneer Press within the past two weeks stating that aircraft noise is the major deterrent in the expansion of airports in the lJnited States. 'This clearly is not a startling revelation. However, it supports MAC's ongoing need for MASAC's services as MSP continues its development tinder the 2010 Plan and the opening of the new 17-35 runway. AL the Eagan meeting, the public representatives were informed the I had discussed the corporation's existence with you and that you felt confident that the MAC support staff and the aircraft noise monitoring system (ANOM) would continue to be available to MASAC. The existing dilemma is the equal representation requirement in the Articles of Incorporation and the corporation s bylaws requiring seven user representatives and seven public representatives as a quorum to conduct the business of the Council. MASAC is a Chapter 317 corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, and that chapter contains a remedy for judicial intervention M.S.A. § 317A.751) when the members cannot break a deadlock, and the corporation or the Mar 01 01 05:27p Charles E. Mertensotto 1612) 222-4755 p.2 Mr. Hamiel March I , 2001 Page 2 parties have not provided for a procedure to resolve the dispute. (The formation of Blue Ribbon Panel.) In this case, venue would be in the Hennepin County District Court. and under Chapter 317 the court may grant equitable relief it considers just and reasonable. The MASAC corporation was not involuntarily dissolved by the withdrawal of the airline representatives. Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation or to the bylaws may be made at a regular or special meeting of the Council by a vote of the majority of the membership present at any meeting. (See Exhibits A & B.) Further, the airlines that have publicly withdrawn from MASAC have forfeited their standing to object to any bylaw requirement, leaving the responsibility to the remaining voting members to resolve the present dilemma. Unless prompted by a substantive objection, there is no need to seek judicial intervention, aI lowing MASAC to resume the conduct of its business by the existing voting members making the necessary changes to the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the corporation. The suggested changes retain the existing MASAC membership at 19 user representatives and 19 public representatives. Retaining a voting membership of user and public representatives equal in number would become a mandated priority permitting the Metropolitan Airport Commission to withdraw its financial and staff support at any time that the Council deliberately ignored the equal representation priority. The Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws as amended would also permit the airlines to reappoint representatives to MASAC at their discretion and on a voluntary basis. Interestingly, Tan Del Calzo, who was the MASAC chairperson from 1979-1932 noted at the f:agan meeting that the City of Minneapolis in the late 70's adopted an ordinance restricting flights over the city of Minneapolis when the prevailing winds were less than 15 knots. Though the ordinance challenged the continued existence of MASAC, the Council did prevail through the support and leadership of various MAC commissioners and MASAC members. 1t is my intent to call a special membership meeting with notice to all existing MASAC members For "Tuesday, March 27, 2001, to be held at the new Lindbergh conference room on 23°i Avenue South. I would only do this with your approval. I will be at the P&F, Committee meeting on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, at which time we could discuss any outstanding questions_ The notice for the special membership meeting would be mailed at least ten days before the special meeting, with the stated purpose of the meeting being to amend MASAC's Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws, and no other. The meeting notice would contain a copy of the proposed amendment to the Articles and the Bylaws. I would rely on Melissa Scovronski to mail out the notices and retype the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws as amended. Our office would undertake the responsibility to record the amended Articles of Incorporation with the Mar 01 Ol OS.e27p Charles E. Mertensotto (6121 222-4755 p.3 Jeff Hamiel March 1, 2001 Page 3 Secretary of State. This would eliminate any financial contribution for attorneys fees and cost on the part of any municipality or the Metropolitan Airport Commission On behalf of the MASAC members, i want to thank you for your efforts in maintaining the history and the continuity of the MASAC organization. Sincerely, �. G- Charles E. Mertensotto C:hairman, Metropolitan,Airport Sound Abatement Council CEM\mjk Enclosures PC: Chairman Charles Nichols, Metropolitan Airports Commission Commissioner Roger Hale. Chair - Planning & Environment Committee Commissioner Alton Gasper, Vice -Chair and MASAC liaison Roy Fuhrmaan, Manager of Environmental Services Barret Lane, Blue Panel Member Designate Jamie Verbrugge, Blue Panel Member Designate Jill Smith, Blue Panel Member Designate 1 01 01 • (612) 222-4755 P.1 p.6 Page S Articles of Incorporation Representatives from the cities. of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Richfield and Bloomington, The village of Mendota Heights, and from Eagan Township; VE provided that the USER REPRESENTATIVES and the PUBLIC REPRESENTATIS shall at all times be equal in number-.. All of said reprosentaei.aa O both USER and PUBLIC, shall have the power and authority set forth in the avlaws of the cnrmoration, and their term Of service shall be as set forth in said Bviews. In addition to the cesignated USER and PUBLIC renresentatives, the appointinq authority may designate an alternate for each auch+represen- tative appointed by it, to act in the absence of the des .nated renre- sentative. (2) The names and addresses of the renresentatives to serve for a two year tern and until their successors are appointed, initially de hated are: NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE ADDRESS APPOINTINr AUTHORITY USER REPRESENTATIVES N. G. Kuitu 6040 28th Avenue Sout:: ;fC Minneapolis, :!inn_ 55450 WA B. G. Griggs, Jr. Northwest Airlines, Inc, M (612) 222-4755 P.1 p.6 Page S Articles of Incorporation Representatives from the cities. of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Richfield and Bloomington, The village of Mendota Heights, and from Eagan Township; VE provided that the USER REPRESENTATIVES and the PUBLIC REPRESENTATIS shall at all times be equal in number-.. All of said reprosentaei.aa O both USER and PUBLIC, shall have the power and authority set forth in the avlaws of the cnrmoration, and their term Of service shall be as set forth in said Bviews. In addition to the cesignated USER and PUBLIC renresentatives, the appointinq authority may designate an alternate for each auch+represen- tative appointed by it, to act in the absence of the des .nated renre- sentative. (2) The names and addresses of the renresentatives to serve for a two year tern and until their successors are appointed, initially de hated are: NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE ADDRESS APPOINTINr AUTHORITY USER REPRESENTATIVES N. G. Kuitu 6040 28th Avenue Sout:: ;fC Minneapolis, :!inn_ 55450 WA B. G. Griggs, Jr. Northwest Airlines, Inc, M `linneapolis-St, Paul nter- naGional Air -part, St_ Paul, tinnesnta 55111 John P. Dow North Central Airlines, NOP. 6201 34th Avenue So., .•inn- eapolis, Minnesota 55450 PUBLIC REPRESENTATIVES Richard M. rrdall 307 City Hall, Minneapolis Minneapolis Minnesota 55415 John T. Richter 4814 Russell Avenue South, Minneapolis ' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 am.es B. Serrin. 4849 Aldrich Avenue South, Minneapolis tinneapolis, Minnesota 55409 Patrick R. O'Neill 1767 :tiuhland Parkway, Saint Saint Paul Paul, Minnesota 55116 Stanley Olson 6420 Vincent Avenue SOuti, Richfield Richfield, Minnesota SSa23 Page Five Mar 01 01 05:36p Charles E. Mertensotto [612) 222-4755 p.2 1 01:Olp EXHIBIT B Page 6 Article IV of the Bylaws \ ARTICLE IV Voting Rights of Membership (7} At all meetings of the councih attendance by seven (7) USER representatives and seven 17) PUBLIC representatives shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of business, provided that no action relating to the establishment of budget or which will result in a change in the budget shall be taken unless �\ there are in attendance and voting thereon at least sixteen (16) representatives. (c( j (2) There shall be equal representation of USER and PUBLIC membership in the corporation, and to that end, tirere,beiriq arrequal Ytumber+4otUSEFLandsP.UBW ves:.toc: u , b P rp_osesrokvritrxdn;alt r#.7aGyrsraqumng'a`vote ufthe;iCooncR each representative, both USER and PUBLIC, shall have one (1) vote, which in the absence of a representative may be his or her duly designated alternate representative. (3) These By-laws may be amended or altered by the vote of a majority of the membership present at any meeting, provided that notice of such proposed amendments shall have been given Ten (10) days prior to a general membership meeting_ ARTICLE V Executive Committee 171 The Chairman, subject to ratification by the membership, shall appoint from [he membership an executive committee which at alf times shall consist of two (2) USER representatives and two (2) PUBLIC representatives who will serve with him as members of said committee for a term of one year, or until successors are appointed. (2) The executive committee may formulate a personnel policy manual, which shall be formalized, presented and ratified by the Council as a whole. The personnel policy manual may be introduced and amended by majority action of the membership at any regular meeting and may be reviewed if necessary at least once a year. 0` p.7 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Table of Contents for November 2000. Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carver Jet Fleet Composition MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by Type 9 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix 10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 11-14 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 15 Carver Jet Amval Related Noise Events 16 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 17 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 18-27 Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircra$ Noise Events Aircraft Ldn dBA 28-29 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report MSP Complaints by City November 2000 of Number of `t °/u of Total �Vwnber =:City Arrival Departure gin: Complaaits .Complainants' Complaints' Apple Valley 0 0 2 2 2 Bloomington 0 0 11 0 <,* 11 7 4 Eagan 42 0 4 �127� 173 9 1 � `:� 26.9% Eden Prairie 0 0 2 t.,,r 4 2 2;�kx :r� 0.6% - ,�2 { Lake Elmo 0 Q 2 0 2 I 4;i 0.3 ��y; � e O�vRr 0 a l = Maple Grove 9 16 25 I 3.9% Mendota Heights 10 '` � 18 � �0 28 14 k��+ 4.3% c* „p% Minneapolis 20 �� 1; 86 37 - 327 40 " 17h - 50.9% _ 0 8 8 0-= = 1.2% Richfield 0 i-s�fl � 1 8 Nature of MSP Complaints Time of Day Complaints by Airport Complaint, Total a r I >me ` Total „vrport Total Excessive Noise 175 233 0000-0559 50 2Q MSP 649 Early/Late 94 m5 0600 - 0659 7 2Cr Airlake 0 Low Flying 1 25 '' 0700 -1159 45,.:,._ Anoka 2 Structural Dist. 1 14 1200 -1559 31 30 = Crystal 0 Helicopter 0 L1 1600- 1959 31 6T Flying Cloud 1 Ground Noise 0 7777 2000 - 2159 32 $2 `- Lake Elmo 0 Engine Run-up ] 3 2200 - 2259 39 43 St. Paul 0 Frequency 3 48 Other 0 0 ''' 2300-2359 40 35 ,,= Misc. 0 Total 649 Total (49 Total- 652 Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints feted via the Internet A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 1 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report November 2000 � Last Year `" Last � t x� ¢'L Arrival/ _z � Count Count Year _� 13WY� `arture. O.verfli ht'`Area _O er`afions O erations� -De' _` , ..Percent ,Percent 4 Arr So. RichfieldBloomington 0 0.0% 137 1.0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 2115 14.5% 2741 20.5% 12R Arr So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 2316 15.8% 2940 22.0%. 22 Arr St. PauVHighland Pazic 179 1.2% 83 0.6% 30L Arr Eagan/Niendota Heights 5272 36.0% 3913 29.2% 30R Art Eagan/Mendota Heights 4765 32.5% 3580 ' 26.7% �TotalArrivals " 146`47 =, 100:(1% 13394 ' 100'0"/os` _, 4 Dep St. PauUHighland Pazk 13 0.1% 7 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2179 15.0% 2849 21.3% 12R De Ea an/Mendota Heights 2308 15.9% 3210 24.1% 22 Dep So. RichfieldBloomington 247 1.7% 326 2.4% 30L Dep So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 5297 36.5% 3877 29.1% 30R De So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 4477 30.8% 3076 23.0% Total De artures 14521 '= 100;0"/0 133'45 .100:.0%. '; �= 29168'a'i '26739 ��'_ ,TofalOperations A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 5 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report November 2000 " Last Year Last ' ' `�' � � "� � ArnvaU z Count - Count Year=�" � `RWY�De �arture. htArea., O Percent" O Percent _Ove'rflt � erations`� eratidns 4 Arr So. RichfieldBloomington 2 0.2% 40 4.1% 12L Arr So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 99 8.9% 103 10.5% 12R Arr So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 203 18.2% 148 I5.1% 22 Arr St. PaullHighland Parlc 42 3.8% 32 3.2% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 559 50.1% 380 38.7% 30R Axr Eagan/Mendota Heights 210 18.8% 279 28.4% `' Arrivals '>: � �-_ l•15 "_° ` -` 982_.i 100s0%+ _ _Total - _l .100.0% 4 Dep St. PauUHighland Park 8 0.8% 9 1.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 147 14.6% 220 27.4% 12R De Eagan/Mendota Heights 213 21.1% 245 30.6% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 52 5.2% 45 5.6% 30L Dep So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 321 31.8% 139 17.3% 30R De So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 267 26.5% 144 18.0% '_ >, Total De artures' "100.0% 802.:• 100.0"!0:'; ,`=;1008" =Total O erations. 2123.' '� 1784 . A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 7 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report November 2000 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet O erations b Hour �= Hour Count ' ,- 2230 517 2300 514 2400 166 100 46 200 8 300 8 400 86 500 203 '=` -=TOTAL, <s 1548 Airline', :..ID ;. .` Sta, e •T e. ' Count ;; American AAL 3 F100 36 American AAL 3 � MD80 29 Airborne ABX � 3 DC8 15 Airborne ABX 3 DC9 31 America West AWE 3 A319 3 America West AWE 3 A320 37 Cham ion CCP 3 B72Q 23 ComAir COM 3 � � CRJ1 45 Delta DAL 3 B72 29 Delta DAL 3 B733 I - Delta DAL 3 MD80 17 FedEx FDX 3 B72 29 FedEx FDX 3 A306 9 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 61 FedEx FDX 3 A310 I Northwest NWA 3. A319 11 Northwest NWA 3 A320 302 Northwest � NWA 3 B72Q � 32. Northwest NWA 3 B742 2 Northwest NWA 3 B752 160 Northwest NWA 3 DC10 10 Northwest NWA 3 DC9Q 208 Omni Air OAE 3 DClO L R an RYN 3 B72 87 Sun Countr SGX 3 B72Q 83 Sun Coun SCX 3 DCIO 4 Air Tran TRS 3 B712 26 Trans World TWA 3 B712 22 Trans World TWA 3 MD80 7 United UAL 3 B72 3 United UAL 3 B735 3 United UAL 3 B73Q 28 United UAL 3 B752 5 UPS UPS 3 6752 7 UPS UPS 3 B763 1 UPS UPS 3 DC8 58 Total : <: 1437< - Note: The top IS nighttime operators represent 92.8% of the total nighttime operations. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Le end Remote Monitoring Tower A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 15 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events November 2000 Departure Departure Departure Departure RMT, - Events Events Eventsr ;Events ID • ;` City ' Address; >65d1 >80dB >90dB >100dB „ 7 - 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 1299 160 1 0 2 Minnea olis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1677 330 11 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 3556 467 40 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Ave. & 49th St. 4540 875 43 - 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 8366 2888 573 12 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave_ & 57th St. 10110 3594 1199 61- 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 5297 1577 141 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 3511 920 32 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 129 11 3 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 88 20 12 2 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 78 16 7 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 113 3 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 2028 198 1 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St. 2881 598 45 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullen St. & Lexington Ave. 2517 421 16 0 . 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 2956 883 147 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 416 64 21 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 697 182 66 10 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 399 92 12 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 824 38 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 862 67 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 808 57 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 3312 1136 305 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 2107 307 4 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 1280 22 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 1125 86 1 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 3056 531 26 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 6182 451 6 1 0 29 Minnea olis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 2339 1 362 5 0 :Total Departure Noise Events .:V 72553 16356 2717 85 . A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 17 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Nov-00 (RMT S1te#4) nakland Ave R. 49th St Minneannlis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) I1/2/009:57 UAL1801 B72 D 30R 96.9 11/29/00g SCX715 B72 D 30R 95.9 11/27/00 UAL1801 B72 D 30R 94.9 11115100 DAL1683 B72 D 30R 94.9 11/29/00 DAL1624 B72Q D 30R 94.6 11/17/0017:54 DAL1624 B720 D 30R 94.4 11/27/007:13 - SCX511 B72Q D 30L 94.2 11/25/0020:01 DAL1683 B72Q D 30R 94.2 11/8/0017:50 SCX743 B72Q D 30L 94.2 11/2 0010:11 SCX715 B72Q D 30R 94.1 (RMT Site#5) 12th Ave. & 58th St_ MinneannNs Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/9/00 6:23 CCP104 B72Q D 30L 102.6 . 11/13/0011:17 CCP230 B72Q D 30L 102 11/8/0016:33 CCP220 B72Q D 30L 101.5 11/26/0012:41 SCX715 B72Q D 30L 101.5 11/8/00 8:55 CCP203 B72Q D 30L 101.3 11/2/0010:20 SCX785 B72Q D 30L 101.1 11/18/0010:39 SCX715 B72Q D 30L 100.7 11/9/009:14 CCP106 B72Q D 30L 100.7 11/9/0015:45 CCP201 B72Q D - 30L 100.4 11/11/007:59 NWA570 B72Q D 30L 1 100.3 (RMT' Site#6) 25th Ave. & 5I St_ Minnennnlis DatefTime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 11/9/0019,23 SCX714 B72Q D 30R 105.5 11/4/0011:35 NWA1543 B72Q D 30R 104.1 111910010:21 SCX715 B72Q D 30R 104 11/24/0011:22 NWA1271 B72Q D 30R 104 11/26/0013:50 NWA566 B72 -D 30R 103.5 11/23/0011:26 NWA1271 B72 D 30R 103A 1112/0011:37 NWA1271gB72 2 30R 103.4 11/17/0022:40 NWA12732 dND 30R 103.2 11/9/0013:48 NWA6242 30R 103 11/16/0015:13 DAL1731 30R 102.9 i A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 19 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Nov-00 (RMT Site#10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St, Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/12/0012:58 NWA83 B742 D 4 101.3 11/12/0013:02 NWA19 B742 D 4 100.4 11/11/0013:01 NWA83 B742 D 4 99.1 11/9/0013:08 NWA19 B744 D 4 99 11/11/0013:57 NWA19 B744 D 4 98.2 11/29/0013:09 NWA19 B742 D 4 98.1 11/16/0013:03 1 NWA19 B744 D 4 97.1 11/2/0015728 NWA967 'DC9Q A 22 96.6 11/7/0018751 SCX792 B72Q A 22 95.8 11/13/0013:31 NWA19 B744 D 4 95.2 (RMT Site#1 l) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ _ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/29/00 13:09 NWA19 B742 D 4 99.8 11/13/0013:32 NWA19 B744 D 4 95.9 11/6/0014:11 NWA19 13744 D 4 95 11/29/0020:41 NWA376 DC9Q D 4 93.3 11/16/0013:03 NWA19 B744 D 4 93 11/11/00 13:01 NWA83 B742 D 4 92.8 11/9/0013:09 NWA19 B744 D 4 91.6 11/20/000:03 NWA308 B72Q D 30R 86.6 11/9/00 6:46 BMJ48 BE80 D 30R 85.8 11/12/0012:58 NWA83 B742 D 4 85.5 (RMT Site#12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 11/7/00 6:47 BMJ48 BE80 D 12L 84A 11/11/0014:15 NWA1847 DC9Q D 4 801 11/11/0013:57 NWA19 B744 D 4 79.9 11/10/0014:30 NWA624 B72Q D 30L 79.5 11/22/0017:22 NWA1252 DC9Q A 12L 79.2 11/22/0014:55 MES3052 SF34 D 12L 79.1 11/12/0012:58 NWA83 B742 D 4 78.8 11/14/0015:08 NMS3086 SF34 D 30R 78.3 111510017:02 MES2831 SF34 D 12L 78.1 ll/l/00 6:59 BMJ13 BE80 D 12R 78 A Product of the Metropolitan AirportsCommission ANOMS Program 21 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Nov-00 (RMT Site#16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas lane. RaPan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type AmvaU De ariure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/6/0011:10 CCP230 B72 D 12R 98.3 11/1/0021:17 NWA56 B742 D 12R 98.1 11/7/00 8:10 SCX227 B72 D 12R 97 I1/1/0010:25 SCX79t B72 D 12R 96.9 11/5/0010:11 CCP106 B72 D 12R 96.5 11/11/00 9:20 CCP220 B72 D 12R 96.2 11/30/0015:23 CCP104 B72Q D 12R 96.2 Il/12/0013:53 NWA446 B72Q D 12R 96.1 ll/22/00.13:22 NWA19 B742 D � 12R 95.8 I1/12/0019:32 AMT334 B72Q D 12R 95.8 (RMT Site#17) 84th St. & 4th Ave.. Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Amval/ De ar[ure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/I/0013:47 NWA19 B742 D 22 98.2 11/8/0013:09 NWA19 B742 D 22 97.7 11/5/0012:58 NWAI9 B742 D 22 95.3 11/7/0012:57 NWA19 B742 D 22 94.4 I1/2/005:18 CCP106 B72Q D 22 94.1 ll/17/0015:27 NWA19 B742 D 22 94 I1/3/0013:13 NWAI9 B742 D 22 94 ll/14/0013:21 NWA19 B742 D 22 92.8 11/4/0013:04 NWA19 B744 D 22 92.7 11/17/0013:32 NWA83 B742 D 22 92.7 (RMT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave. Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arriva]/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) II/I/0013:47 NWA19 B742 D 22 103.8 11/5/0012:39 NWA83 B742 D 22 103.1 I1/7/0012:56 NWA19 B742 D 22 102.6 11/5/0012:58 NWA19 B742 D 22 102.2 11/2/0018:23 NWA19N B742 D 22 102.2 I1/17/0013:32 NWA83 B742 D 22 101.5 11/17/0015:27 - NWA19 B742 D 22 100.9 11/3/0013:13 NWA19 B742 D 22 100.7 11/15/0013:20 NWA19 B742 D 22 100.7 I1/7/0017:11 NWA580 B72 D 22 100.1 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program - - 23 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Nov-00 (RMT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heiehts Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 11/11/0013:13 SCX748 B72 D 12R 85.8 11/22/0010:12 MES3240 SF34 A 30R 84.9 I1/2/0020:33 UAL1238 B72Q A 30L 84.5 11/3/0013:47 NWA1470 DC9 A 30L 84.4 I1/12/0019:27 NWA327 B72Q D 12R 84.4 11R8/0021:31 NWA56 B742 D 12R 84.1 11/14/00 7:45 NWA1078 Unlmown A 30L 83.6 11/5/00 6:15 SCX463 B72 D 12R 83.3 11/5/00 8:06 SCX227 B72 D 12R 83.2 11/12/G022:29 NWA308N B72Q D 12R 83.1 (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Avemte_ Mendota H�eivhts Date/Time � Flight Number Aircraft Type Amval/ De ariure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/]3/007:25 AMT304 B72Q D 12L 99.5 1128/0019:01 SCX784 B72 D 12L 98.7 11/12/0015:40 NWA186 B72Q D 12L 98.6 II/7/0014:13 NWA624 B72Q D 12L 97.7 11/28/0019:23 NWA628 B72Q D 12L 97.7 I1/1/0019:08 NWAI272 B72 D 12L 97.7 11/6/00 6:51 AMF304 B72Q D 12L 97.3 I1/1/0010:21 SCX715 B72 D 12L 97.2 11/23/009:31 NWA962 B72Q D 12L 97.2 I1/30/0013:38 NWA624 B72 D 12L 96.9 (RMT Site#24) Chanel i,ane Xr Wren T.ane F.aaan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Amval/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 11/5/00 7:16 CCP104 B72 D 12R 91.7 11/7/00 8:10 SCX227 B72 D IZR 90.7 11/12/00 7:06 CCP104 B72 D 12R 90.3 I1/13/0010:39 SCX785 B72 D 12R 90 II/4/0015:39 NWA765 DC9 A 30R 89.1 11/1/0014:55 NWA446 B72 D 12R 89 11/4/0021:15 NWA44 DC10 D 12R 88.9 ] 1/5/00 6:14 SCX463 B72 D 12R 88.9 11/11/00 13:12 - SCX748 B72 D 12R 88.8 I I/I/00 6:27 CCP101 B72Q D 12R 88.6 i A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 25 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Nov-00 (RMT Site#28) 4.5 16th Avemie.R Richfield Date rime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/10/000:31 RYN710 B720 D 30L 92.7 11/13/0017:44 SCX537 B72Q D 30L 91.9 11/24/0017:40 SCX537 B72Q D 30L 91.6 11/10/0011:31 NWA1265 DC90 D 30L 90.2 11/13/0021:31 DHL142 B72Q D 30L 90.1 11/17/00 039 RYN710 Unknown D 30L 89.9 11/20/00 7 19 FFT653 B73Q D. 30L 89.8 1111610014:58 UAL1801 B72Q D 30R 89.7 11/9/00 21:31 DHL142 B72Q D 30L 89.4 1W7/0014:01 UAL373 B73Q D 30L 89.] (RMT Site#29) . Ericsson Mementxry Schnol. 4315 91.et Ave .R Min-near,nikc Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 11/21/0019:53 SCX408 B72Q D 30R 91.2 11/4/0011:51 Unknown Unknown D 30R 91.1 11/10/0019:30 SCX792 B72Q D 30R 91 11/2410015:24 SCX741 B72Q D 30L 91 11/10/0019:18 SCX408 B720 D 30R 90.1 11/3/0017:20 UAL1876 B73Q D 30R 89.9 11/20/0020:09 SCX408 B72Q D 30R 89.8 11/2/0019:40 SCX408 B72Q D 30R 89.3 11/3/0017:29 NWA746 B72Q D 30R 89.2 11/3/0013:10 UAL373 B73Q D 30R 89.1 November 2000 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for November 2000 were comprised of 92.4% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the Boeing 727 Hushed with 70.3% of the highest Lmax events. Note: Unknown fields are due to data unavailability in FAA flight track data. November 2000 Technical Advisor Report Notes Note: Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the month of November 2000. A Product or the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 27 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events -Aircraft Ldn dBA November 2000 Remote Monitoring Towers ,Date r, ,#16 '#17 #18 '#19 #2Q #21- #22:. #23 '#24 #25 #26 #27. ��8, #29- 1 70.7 57.3 60.7 53.3 42.7 59.9 59.5 72.7 66.4 65.2 60.7 45.6 58 30.9 2 67.2 65.9 72.5 65.1 61.3 47.1 60.7 58.9 64.4 52.6 56.5 64.7 66.8 64.5 3 69 58.3 63.7 60.5 55.8 45.9 61.4 57.8 65.5 45.8 53.8 63.5 65.6 63.7 4 67.3 56.3 57.8 54.5 50 56.2 57.1 67.6 62.7 53.6 58.1 64.8 60.7 59.4 5 69 54.8 61.4 51.9 41.2 59.9 59.9 71.7 65.5 59.8 62.3 33.6 56.7 31.1 6 68.6 42.6 44.2 34.2 47 � 54.5 SS 72.4 60.9 66.4 58.6 50:2 62.9 39 7 70.9 58.6 66.9 60.9 49.7 60.1 59.5 73.6 65.7 64.9 61.8 38.1 59.2 33 8 68.1 62.3 65 59.3 51 n/a 61.2 58.8 64.4 47.9 53.4 65.9 64 61.6 9 68.9 51 53.7 43.9 53.3 41.9 58 S4.S 65 46.1 53.7 65 657 62.9 10 68.5 53.5 56.8 50.2 54.9 n/a 61.4 51.9 64.7�.33.7 52.3 60.5 67.3 61.5 11 683 44.2 46.7 35.5 37.6 58.2 58.1 68.8 63.2 58.2 60.1 S8.S 60.5 45.5 l2 70.2 n/a 35.4 31 n/a 58.4 59.1 72.4 64.3 59.5 58.8 44.5 60 n/a 13 69.4 41.8 50.6 48.1 50.8 54.2 61.1 67.7 64.9 53.6 55.2 59.9 65 61.3 14 68.1 55.9 59.1 � 49.9 55.7 48.1 60 55.9 64 48.8 52.3 63.2 65.9 63.8 IS 67.6 51 � 57.9 46 49 44.9 60.2 57.8 63 53.1 56.5 65.4 65.1 60.8 16 68 46 53 ? 47 52.7 43 59.5 57 63.3 47.8 49.2 63 66.7 62 17 67.2 55.7 61.5 52.6 49.5 48.3 57.9 54.5 62.1 42.6 52.1 64.9 65.2 61.1 t8 66.5 55.6 60.8 53.6 57.7 33 S9 56.7 67.8 47.6 46.3 62.9 62.2 59.9 19 68.2 40.2 43.8 37.3 54.3 38 60.3 62.3 65 50.7 56.2 64.2 64.9 61 20 65.9 59.3 49.5 56.4 6t.4 n/a. SS.4 54.3 61.3 47.1 43.9 57.8 64.8 64.2 21 66.7 59.3 61.6 55.7 51 40.1 55 60.1 60.6 52 46.9 59.8 62.3 62.4 22 69.8 52.9 60 59.6 39.4 59.2 57.9 69.6 62.9 54.8 57.5 63.2 58.8 52.8 23 68.2 54.5 59.1 55.2 52.4 54.2 57.9 64.9 63.8 51.1 56.8 54.2 59 57.4 24 65.3 42.7 43.6 33.2 44 53.9 55.1 69.5 59.7 54.3 55.8 62 60.6 60.3 25 66.2 43.1 44.9 42 45.9 46.7 55.2 57.1 61 48.3 52 66 62.3 58.4 26 682 64.9 70 65.4 51.6 40.3 57.9 53.4 61.4 SO 45.1 58.5 b0.4 54.9 27 68.8 44.6 472 48.4 53.7 41.2 59.2 58.8 63.6 56.4 513 61.9 65.1 64.4 28 72.1 51.3 45.7 51.6 48.3 59.6 59.8 74.5 64.7 62.3 60.5 47 60.6 31.3 29 68.8 49 47.7 39.4 SO 49 60.6 64.3 63.9 42.8 51 � 65.6 65.7 61.6 30 70 46.1 4S � 45.9 42 � 59.9 60.6 69.7 64.9 59.9 61.4 58.6 62.3 59.9 Mo. Ldn 68.7 57,2 .62.2 56.6 S3.S $4.7 59:2 fi7.8 63.8 `58.0 57.Q:: 62 2 637 60:5 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program - 29 �� wavy. � � ©� »° � � <� � ` 2 � t��� 2- 3�� � dz»2 � � \� »,� � � �� z/� i � «:az������ »!«« � � � �� � � � �� �� �� «»«: m / _- � +:w« «w: �� � � � � y.v�� y:� «� _\_»: - ��� m£�:. . � < d� �� « »_\� A :�:� � �� ?b% ©-\ � :« �� x:v >s� _ � « :� � a . « ..�.», y- ,:� .:. z Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Table of Contents for December 2000 Complaint Summary Noise Complaint Map FAA Available Time for Runway MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6 MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Carver Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Carrier Jet Deparhzre Related Noise MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft LdndBA 28-29 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report MSP Complaints by City December 2000 Nature of MSP Complaints I .Time of Day Complaints by Airport Excessive Noise 103 234' ;`- 0000-0559 10 R; MSP 478 Early/Late 32 59 0600-0659 8 0 Airlake 0 Low Flying 1 9 0700 - 1159 17 0 Anoka 3 Structural Dist. p 10 _ ., 1200-1559 15 f539 Crystal 0 Helicopter 0 '0� 1600- 1959 19 45 --_- Flying Cloud 2 Ground Noise 2 0 = 2000-2159 38 Lake Elmo 0 Engine Run-up p _ 0 _ '_ 2200 - 2259 16 St. Paul 3 Frequency 1 26 2300-2359 16 50 Misc. 0 Other p 1 -.Total 478 Total 478 Total: 486 , No[e: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Interne[ A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program * 1 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report December 2000 4 Arr So. RichfieldBloomnigton 4 0.0% 32 0.2% 12L Arr So. Minneape/No. Richfield 2474 16.8% 2798 19.4°/u 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 2733 18.6% 3129 21.6% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 17 0.1% 71 0.5% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 5061 34.3% 4533 31.3% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 4457 30.2% 3906 27.0% Total Arrivals . 14746 100.0"/0' 144W 1.16090%' 4 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 5 0.0% 13 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2478 17.0% 2919 20.4% 12R Duep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2725 18.7% 3216 22.4% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloon nigton 46 0.3% 88 0.6% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 5127 35.2% 4548 31.8% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4198 28.8% 3542 24.7% Total Departures 1409,7. J. t' 100AO/0 44326 - 100:0%_ Total 'Operations : 29325 28795 _. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program " 5 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Nighttime All Operations 10*30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report December 2000 Last Year Last t ArrrvaU ' Count t, Count Year `' ` 'Overih 13WY De'arture. - htArea O erations: Percent" O er'ations Percent' 4 Arr So. Richfield/Bloonungton 1 0.1% 28 2,4% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 130 9,9% 91 7.8% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 214 16.3% 157 13.5% 22 Arr St, Paul/Highland Park 9 03% 21 1.8% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 552 42.1% 555 47.8% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 404 30.9% 310 26.7% Total Arrivals 1310 '- 100.0%u 1162- ,100:b%<% 4 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 3 0.2% 13 1:16/0 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 209 14.7% 242 20.8% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 252 17.8% 256 22.0% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloormg7ton 38 247% 22 1.9% 30L Dep So. Minneapofis/No. Richfield 472 33.2% 321 27.5% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 446 3144% 312 26.7% Total De artuxes z. 142C `-' 100600 1166' . : TofaTO erations =-2730 '2328``.{ , A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 7 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report December 2000 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Hour V� Count `c 2230 599 2300 719 2400 260 100 98 200 46 300 16 400 54 500 205 TOTAL 1997,6 Airline ; .ID ' Sta a =: Type ; "Count `-' American AAL 3 F100 40 American AAL 3 MD80 28 Airborne ABX 3 DC8Q 10 Airborne ABX 3 DC9Q 22 America West AWE 3 A319 4 America West AWE 3 A320 44 Champion CCP 3 B72Q 37 ComAir COM 3 CRJI 49 Delta DAL 3 B72Q 2 Delta DAL 3 B733 2 Delta DAL 3 MD80 10 FedEx FDX 3 A306 5 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 8 FedEx FDX 3 DCIO 69 FedEx FDX 3 MDI1 2 Northwest NWA 3 A319 24 Northwest NWA 3 A320 367 Northwest NWA 3 B72Q 64 Northwest NWA 3 B742 9 Northwest NWA 3 B752 248 Northwest NWA 3 DC10 14 Northwest NWA 3 DC9Q 346 Omni Air OAE 3 DC10 14 Ryan RYN 3 A320 4 Ryan RYN 3 B72Q 90 Sun Country SCX 3 B72Q 114 Sun Country SCX 3 DClO 13 Trans World TWA 2 DC9Q 1 Trans World TWA 3 B712 1 Trans World TWA 3 MD80 7 United UAL 3 A320 2 United UAL 3 B72Q 34 United UAL 3 B73Q 22 United UAL 3 B752 4 UPS UPS 3 B752 3 UPS UPS 3 B763 1 UPS UPS 3 DC8Q 54 Vanguard VGD 3 B73Q 27 Total _<. = 1795 Nore: The top IS nighttime operators represent 89.9% of the total nighttime operations. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System 0 Les: end Remote Monitoring Tower A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program , 15 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events December 2000 RMT ID City Departure ;vents,._s.Eyents Departure , Departure _ Events , Departure ; Events t >100dBAres I Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 1025 75 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1259 138 1 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 2629 323 16 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Ave. & 49th St. 3143 451 16 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 7M2 2117 413 1 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 8635 2552 664 14 7 Richfield IIIIIIIqI Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 4793 1085 92 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2599 485 5 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. &Hartford Ave. 109 3 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 55 5 2 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Sclieffer Ave. 73 6 2 D 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 115 3 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 2084 118 0 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St. 3269 590 36 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullen St. & Lexington Ave. 2615 265 4 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 3305 853 124 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 207 17 4 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 293 59 15 2 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 150 17 1 2 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 477 17 2 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 918 49 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 998 46 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 3689 1051 203 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln, 2481 258 2 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 1432 21 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 344 B 98 1 0 27 Minneapolis AnthonySchool 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2248 256 5 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 5021 299 5 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 1563 118 1 0 Total De artare Noise Events -63881 11375 1615 17. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � ]7 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Dee-00 (RM'I' Site#4) Oakland Ave. R. 49th St Minnennnlis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/17/0014:01 NWA19 B742 D 30L 94.9 12/14/0013:08 NWA304 DC10 A 12R 93.7 12/6/0010:05 UAL1801 B72Q D 30R 93.1 12/26/0018:13 DAL1624 B72Q D 30R 92 120/0022,06 NWA56 B742 D 30L 91.6 12/31/007:44 UAL1473 B72Q D 30R 1 91.5 12/31/0019:57 NWA1272 B72Q D 30R 91.3 12/31/0013:55 NWA1296 B72Q D 30R 91.2 12/31/G021:14 DAL1683 B72Q D 30R 91.1 12/18/0017:20 DAL1624 B72Q D 30R 90.8 (RMT Site#5) 1 nth Ave. R. SRth St Minneannlic Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival] Departure Runway Lmax (d6) 12/7/0012:40 CCP201 B72Q D 30L 100.7 12/17/0012:45 NWA83 B742 D 30L 99.7 12/7/0012:35 CCP104 B72Q D 30L 99.6 12/19/0013:35 NWA19 B742 D 30L 99.5 12/24/0013:40 NWA19 B742 D 30L 99.3 12/24/0013:56 NWA83 B742 D 30L 99.2 12/8/0010:34 CCP101 B72Q D 30L 99 12/6/0013:42 NWA19 B742 D 30L 98.7 12/26/0013:25 NWA19 B742 D 30L 98.6 12/30/0010:39 SCX715 B72Q D 30L 98.2 (RM'I' Site#6) 25th Ave. & 57th St.. Minneannlis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 12/6/0013:52 NWA624 B72Q D 30R 101.9 12/6/0011:59 NWA1271 B72Q D 30R 101.6 12/19/0013:42 NWA1296 B72Q D 30R 101.1 12/12/0011:36 NWA271W B72Q D 30R 100.9 12/18/0012:21 NWA1271 B72Q D 30R 100.9 12/2/00 8:14 SCX791 B72Q A 12R 100.8 12/7/0013:26 NWA624 B72Q D 30R 100.5 12/10/0020:53 NWA1273 B72Q D 30R 100.5 12/6/007:56 NWA148 B72Q D 30R 100.5 12/11/00 8:56 Unknown BE18 D 30L 100.4 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 19 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft IN Events for IvSP Dec-00 Site#1011 Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type At -rival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/1/0014:42 NWA19 B742 D 4 95.9 12/10/0013:15 NWA19 B742 D 4 94 12/3/0018:29 SCX464 B72Q A 22 93.5 12/3/00 23:47 AMT258 B72Q A 22 92.4 12/3/0017:58 NWA1272 B72Q A 22 91.7 12/3/001232 NWA150 DCIO A 22 91.6 12/3/001225 AMT758 B72Q A 22 91 12/3/00 13:10 NWA146 DCIO A 22 90.9 12/3/0020:04 NWA755 DCIO A - 22 90.6 12/3/00 22:37 SCX744 B72Q A 22 90.4 (RMT Site#I1) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St, Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/10/0013:15 NWA19 B742 D 4 98.7 12/1/0014:42 NWA19 B742 D 4 97.7 12/7/00 10:49 NWA1271 B72Q A 12L 89.2 12/7/0013:56 NWA19 B744 D 4 85.4 12/17/004:08 SCX521 B72Q D 30L 84.3 12/30/00 6:57 SCX623 B72 D 30L 82.5 12/9/00 8:47 BMJ72 BE80 D 4 80.8 12/29/00 8:00 NWA1506 DC9Q A 30R 80.5 12/23/00 9:13 BMJ66 BE80 D 12L 79.8 12/25/0022:29 NWA612 DC9Q D 30L 78A (RNl'I' Site#12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 12/13/00 7:43 Unknown BE18 D 12L 87.7 12/15/00 7:55 BMJ75 BE80 D 12L 86.7 12/17/0016:23 USA1088 A319 D 30R 84.1 12/20/009:25 Unknown BE18 D 12R 79.8 12/23/00 9:24 BMJ52 BE80 D 12L 79.5 12/7/00 9:27 MES3322 SF34 D 12L 1 79.1 12/9/007:35 NWA1530 A320 D 12I, 78.3 12/23/009:18 HKA1016 SW4 D 12L 78.3 12/2/0018:30 UAL1238 B72 A 12L 77.7 12/11/0012:06 NWA419 DC9Q A 30R 77.7 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 21 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Dec-00 (RMT Site#16) Avalon Ave. & Was Lane. Eaean Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type - Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/l/0010:06 SCX406 B72Q D 12R 95.7 12/3/0014:56 SCX748 B72Q D 12R 95.7 12/1/008:07 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 95.6 12/23/0011:20 VGD412 B73Q A 30L 95.5 12/23/00 9;55 CCP402 B72Q D 12R 95.5 12/13/0015:53 CCP101 B720 D 12R 95.4 12/28/0011:15 CCP201 B72Q D 12R 95.1 12/27/0015:47 CCP402 B72Q D 12R 95 12/1/006:37 CCPI01 B72Q D 12R 94.6 12/20/0014:00 NWA644 B72Q D 12R 94.6 (RMT Site#17) 84th St. & 4th Ave.. Bloomineton Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/3/00 13:04 NWA83 B742 D 22 93.8 12/3/0013:17 NWA19 B742 D 22 92.1 12/26/0023:36 NWA677 B72Q D 22 91.2 12/4/0013:00 NWA19 B744 D 22 90.6 12/2/0012:44 ABX353 Unknown D 22 89 12/8/0013:06 NWA83 B742 D 22 88.4 12/9/0013:03 NWA19 B744 D 22 87.2 12/8/0013,42 NWA19 B742 D 22 86.9 12/3/0012:17 NWA945 DC10 D 22 85 12/18/0021:35 Unknown Unknown D 30L 84 (RMT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave_ Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De ariure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/8/0013:41 NWA19 B742 D 22 102.6 12/22/0013:20 NWA83 B742 D 22 100.8 12/3/0013:16 NWA19 B742 D 22 99.5 12/8/0013:06 NWA83 B742 D 22 99.1 12/9/0012:46 NWA83 B742 D 22 98.9 12/3/0013:03 NWA83 B742 D 22 98.1 12/9/0013:03 NWA19 B744 D 22 97.5 12/2/0012:43 ABX353 Unknown D 22 97 12/3/0023:52 NWA56 B742 D 22 96.9 12/24/0022:42 NWA1273 B72Q D 22 96 i A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 23 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft IN Events for MSP Dee-00 (KNIT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail_ Tnver C,rnve Heiahtc Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/7/00 6:35 CCP104 B72Q D 12R 85.9 12/3/0018:53 NWA1072 B72Q D 12R 84.5 12/3/0011:39 DAL1057 B72Q D 12R 84 12/13/0022:11 NWA625 B72Q D 12L 84 12/9/0011:25 DAL1057 B72Q D 12R 83.9 12/1/00 16:51 NWA580 B72Q D 12R 83.7 12/15/0019:04 NWA327 B72Q D 12R 83.2 12/2/00 8:10 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 83 12/3/0014:04 AMT255 B72Q D 12R 82.9 12/13/0011:45 NWA627 B72Q D 12R 82.6 (RMT Site#23) F.nd of Kenndon Avenue Menrinm Haiahts Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/3/0020:56 NWA1273 B72Q D 12L 100 12/25/0020:02 NWA1272 B72Q D 12L 98.1 12/27/0010:39 SCX715 B72Q D 12L 97.6 1225/0017:26 DAL1624 B72Q D 12L 97.6 1228/0021:31 DAL1624 B72Q D 12L 97.5 12/1/0010:06 AMT555 B72Q D 12L 97.5 12/7/009:57 UAL1801 B72Q D 12L 97.3 1220/0011:53 NWA673 B72Q D 12L 97 12/3/0011:58 NWA1271 B72Q D 12L 96.7 12/l/0019:25 SCX408 B72Q D 12L 96.3 (RMT Site#24) Chanel Lane & Wren T Ane. Fagan Date/Pime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 12/9/0021:47 NWA56 B742 D 12R 91.2 12/3/00 8:27 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 90.6 12/2/0012:11 DAL1057 B72Q D 12R 89.6 12/1/0021:10 NWA56 B742 D 12R 89.3 12/3/0011:38 DAL1057 B72Q D 12R 89.3 12/7/00 7:13 SCX501 B72Q D 12R 89 12/2/00 8:10 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 89 12/25/0012:27 NWA921 B742 D 12R 88.5 12/7/0013:12 DAL1859 B72Q A 30L 87.7 1213/00 9:27 CCP201 B72Q D 12R 87.6 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 25 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Dec-00 (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Avenue S.. Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/16/0010:27 NWA561 B72Q D 30L 94 12/30/0017:39 NWA1272 B72Q A 30L 92.3 12/22/00 0:27 RYN7102 B72Q D 30L 92 12/4/00 22:00 ABX353 DC8Q D 30L 91.4 12/16/0011:17 KHA3771 Unknown D 30L 90.8 12/26/0012:28 UAL690 Unknown D 30L 90.8 12/21/000:43 RYN7102 Unknown D 30R 8M 12/4/0010:07 AMT555 B72Q D 30R 89.5 12/16/0015:29 NWA558 DC9Q D 30L 89.5 12/27/0017:53 CCP240 B72Q D 12R 89.5 (RMT Site#29) Ericsson Elementary School. 4315 31st Ave. S.. Mirmeanolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 12/20/0019:42 SCX714 B72Q D 30R 92.3 12/6/00 7:16 SCX623 B72Q D 30R 89.5 12/7/0018:46 NWA746 B72Q D 30R 89.3 12/29/00 8:24 NWA680 DC9Q D 30R 88.8 12/29/0018:22 SCX743 B72Q D 30L 88.7 12/4/0014:56 NWA686N DC9Q D 30R 88A 12/4/0017:53 SCX743 B72Q D 30R 88.2 12/4/0013:28 NWA964 DC9Q D 30R l2/4/0013:18 NWA84 B72 D 30R t87A 12/4/0018:50 NWA628 B72 D 30R December 2000 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for December 2000 were comprised of 87.2% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the Boeing 727 Hushed with 62.1 % of the highest Lmax events. Note: Unknown fields are due to data unavailability in FAA flight track data. December 2000 Technical Advisor Reoort Notes Note: Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the month of December 2000. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program i 27 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA December 2000 Remote Monitoring Towers Date= 4 #16 #17' #18' #M #20' #21 #21: #23 #24'-_ #25 :#26 #27 :#28 #29 1 71.9 1 48.8 56.2 49.6 41.1 59.9 60.6 69.7 66.2 1 62.8 62.5 53.1 63.2 35.8 2 69.1 52.2 56.6 47 36 53.5 56.6 67.6 63.7 53.6 57.9 56.4 54.7 36.3 3 67.5 55.9 65.4 54.5 60.8 58.7 58.4 71.2 64 56.5 62.9 44.9 47.5 32.3 4 67.1 54.8 53.5 49.2 55.5 49.5 58.7 56.8 623 53.1 51.6 59.3 66.8 61.5 5 66.7 53.4 60.1 50 49.3 34 52.8 49.9 1 59.1 48 47 58.3 1 61 58.9 6 67.7 43.9 51.9 42.3 44.6 56.1 60.1 68.1 633 54.7 57.2 62.1 62.1 58.8 7 69. 39.1 49.6 37.2 47.7 52.5 61.1 66.3 65,7 55A 58.3 58.9 63.2 59.7 8 66.6 53.7 61.3 56.1 53.6 39.8 57.1 56 60.6 50 46.9 63.6 62.6 59 9 69.1 47.5 58.2 53.7 37.2 57.4 57.6 69.8 64.7 57.8 61 n/a 48.7 35.1 10 65.1 55.2 61.6 53.5 49.6 37.9 52.3 49.6 58.4 41.2 48.1 60 60.5 56A 11 64.5 44.5 54.5 56.8 39.2 36.8 54.2 50.7 59 43.7 49.9 58.2 62.6 53.7 12 66.3 55.2 50,9 54 57.3 40.7 53.1 52.9 58.6 50.2 48.9 60 59.9 56.5 13 70.3 38.5 47.8 37.4 n/a 58.4 62.1 69.6 65.6 57.6 60.1 40.3 51.4 31.9 14 68.3 43 43.5 41 45.8 56.9 61.9 70.1 643 52.9 59.9 589 58 49 15 69.9 44.5 48.4 46.7 31.6 59 61.5 71.3 64.8 62.1 62.7 41.8 56.3 36.7 16 67.1 45.8 39.8 45.5 55.7 44.2 582 56.6 61 47.1 48.7 58.2 64.3 56.4 17 65.6 41.7 34.6 34.4 43.5 43.3 53.4 50.6 59.1 39.8 47.1 592 59.2 56.5 18 66.3 46.2 44.2 32 462 45A 57.7 61 59.7 48.3 48.6 62 64 56.2 19 66.3 48 50.8 46.7 51.6 45.6 53.6 49.5 57.9 49.8 51.9 61.1 62.6 56.3 20 68.2 43.6 45 39 49 55.4 56.3 67.2 63 54.3 57 61.4 61.8 58.1 21 64.1 51.5 45.2 47.3 53.6 n/a 48.5 52.9 56.9 43.1 36.4 56.9 63A 57.4 22 69.6 36.6 57.7 42.1 51.6 55.3 56.2 67.6 61.3 50.5 54.6 583 63.2 51 23 67.9 31.5 31.8 32.1 51.1 47.4 552 62.2 59.9 54.3 53.1 1 59.1 61.7 54.5 24 65.5 48.8 64.8 49.9 59.9 34.7 51.2 50.8 56.9 43.5 38.6 60.6 61.9 54.7 25 66.5 48.7 41.8 n/a 49.1 54.8 56.8 68.6 62.4 51.3 57.2 55.4 57.1 54.6 26 65.5 59.8 61.8 49 56.3 1 33.5 54.3 54.8 59.7 48.7 46.5 61.3 63.4 56.2 27 70 42.7 49.3 39.1 39.9 58.3 57.9 1 69.3 63.6 55.2 58.2 35.8 58.3 n/a 28 68.7 43.7 53.3 52.3 44.4 51.1 59.3 67.8 62.5 55.7 60.3 63.1 63.2 54.9 29 66.3 36.8 45.2 40.6 46.3 38.6 57.3 54 60.6 43.1 49.5 64.3 64.9 56.6 30 65.5 39.6 46.8 42.2 49.4 n/a 552 51.5 58.6 40.9 40.5 62.8 62.9 55.8 31 65.4 35.3 39.4 33.8 47.8 37.3 57.3 47.5 58.5 37 37.8 62.9 61.5 59.7 Mo. Ldn 67.8 50 8 51.0 49:6 52.5 53 6 57.8 b5:9 62.2 54 4 56:Si A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 29 d$ / � �-� f'r3-* �� 1' Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Table of Contents for January 2001 Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition_ MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage $ MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by Type 9 MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 11-14 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 15 Carrier Jet Amval Related Noise Events _. __ _ 16 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 17 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 18-27 Analysis of DaIly and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft LdndBA 28-29 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Cot�imission ANOMS Program Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAQ Technical Advisor's Report MSP Complaints by City January 2001 Nature of MSP Complaints Time of Day Complaints by Airport Natnre of -- Excessive Noise 254 25S 0000 - 0559 19 25 MSP 714 Early/Late 57 42 }< 0600-0659 66 -- Airlake 0 Low Flying 1 27 ._ 0700 - 1159 67 63 Anoka 3 Structural Dist. 0 16 1200-1559 55 41. = Crystal 0 Helicopter 0 0 1600 -1959 60 66 Flying Cloud 2 , Ground Noise 2 .0 2000 - 2159 51 104 , , Lake Elmo 0 Engine Run-up 0 .0 2200-2259 46 37 St. Paul 1 ,% Frequency 7 53 -,�- 2300-2359 16 Other 0 0 = Total 714 Total.. 714 Total 721 i , Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 4 1 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report January 2001 4 Arr So. RichfieldBloomington 72 0.5% 99 0.7% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 1621 10.8% 2546 18.9% 12R Arr So. Minna olis/No. Richfield 1831 12.2% 2930 21.7% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 4 0.0% 6 0.0% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 5952 39.7% 4243 31.4% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 5519 36.8% 3676 27.3% Total Arrivals 14999 > 100.0% 13500 100i0%' 4 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 6 0.0% 8 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1670 11.2% 2604 19.2% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1878 12.7% 3043 22.5% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 77 0.5% 88 0.7% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 6059 40:8% 4398 32.5% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No, Richfield 5180 34.80/. 3387 25.0% Total Departures 14870 - 100.0% 13528 1WO0/6 Total Operations 29869 27028 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program ; Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report January 2001 4 Arr So. RichfieldBloomington 2 0.2% 54 4.8% 12L Arr So: Minneapolis/No. Richfield 84 7.2% 81 7.2% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 151 12.9% 125 11.2°/o 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 6 0.5% 3 0.3% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 517 44.2% 494 44.1% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 410 35.0% 364 32.4% Total Arrivals " 1170 100]0"/0 1121 . ioo pko ' 4 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 5 0.6% 8 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 127 14.1% 176 12R De Eagan/Mendota Heights 163 18.1% 213 428,60% 22 De So. Richfield/Bloomington 56 6.2% 28 30L Dep So. Minna olis/No. Richfield 277 30.8% 303 30R De So. Minna olis/No. Richfield 272 30.2% 331 Total Departures 1900' 100000% 1059 -100.0%` Total Operations 2070 '. 2180 ' A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program ' 7 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report January 2001 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Hour 2230 496 2300 449 2400 122 100 37 200 11 300 9 400 90 500 273 Airline 1I) stage - I e Count -' American AAL 3 F100 29 American AAL 3 MD80 32 Airborne ABX 3 DC8Q 17 Airborne ABX 3 DC9Q 34 Trans Air AMT 3 DCIO 1 Trans Air AMT 3 B72Q 25 America West AWE 3 A319 4 America West AWE 3 A320 44 Champion CCP 3 B72Q 44 Com Air COM 3 CRJI 50 FedEx FDX 3 A310 t FedEx FDX 3 B720 23 FedEx FDX 3 A306 26 FedEx FDX 3 DCIO 43 M Hawk YHA 3 '. B72Q 17 Northwest NWA 3 B744 2 Northwest NWA 3 B757 3 Northwest NWA 3 DCIO 7 Northwest NWA 3 A319 12 Northwest NWA 3 B742 13 Northwest NWA 3 B72Q 54 Northwest NWA 3 DC9Q 182 Northwest NWA 3 B752 190 Northwest NWA 3 A320 219 Omni Air OAE 3 DCIO 24 Ryan RYN 3 A320 4 Ryan RYN 3 B72Q 80 Sun Country SCX 3 DCIO 8 Sun Country SCX 3 B72Q 97 Air Tran TRS 3 B712 30 Vanguard UAL 3 B735 2 United UAL 3 B73Q 8 United UAL 3 B72Q 15 United UAL 3 B733 16 UPS UPS 3 B752 7 UPS UPS 3 DC8Q 59 TOTAL 1422 `- Nore: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 95.6% of the total nighttime operations. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program ^o itan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Le end Remote Monitoring Tower A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 0 15 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events January 2001 RMT ID r` `City Address 1 Departure Events-- >65dB Departure Events >80dB Departure Events' >90dB Departure Events >100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 1258 116 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1527 215 3 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 3247 404 21 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Ave. & 49th St. 4006 601 30 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St, 8838 2441 438 2 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 10908 3334 971 26 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 5952 1248 88 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. &143rd St. 3546 756 10 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 88 3 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 57 10 7 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 55 6 3 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 79 . 4 1 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1405 105 3 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & Mckee St. 2285 440 43 0 15 Mendota Heights Callon St. & Lexington Ave. 1774 223 5 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 2428 601 105 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 274 23 5 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 397 76 22 1 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St, 211 33 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 663 15 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 648 23 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 689 20 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 2593 780 232 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 1653 174 2 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 1036 16 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 952 63 1 0 27 Minneapolis AnthonySchool 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2838 313 6 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 4909 340 6 0 29 Minnea olis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 2391 240 1 0 Total De arture Noise Events 66707 12623 2003 29 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 17 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Jan-01 (RMT Site#4) Oakland Ave_ & 492h St_ Minneannlia Date/Pime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/2/200110:26 SCX715 B72Q D 30L 95.1 1/12/2001 7:44 UAL1453 B72Q D 30R 94A 1/6/200114:05 UAL1155 B72Q D 30R 93.9 1/30/200116:22 UAL339 B72Q D 30R 93.8 1/10/200115:56 DAL1624 B72Q D 30R 93.4 1/14/2001 19:26 NWA1272 B72Q D 30R 92.9 1/121200110:23 SCX407 B72 D 30R 92.9 1/5/200122:20 NWA677 B72Q D 30R 92.6 1/121200110:28 SCX403 B72Q D 30R 92.1 1/21/20019:38 NWA671 B72Q D 30R 91.9 (RMT Site#5) 17th Ave. Q SRth .Ct Date/I'ime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/r Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/26/200114:45 SCX748 Unknown D 30L 100.9 1/30/200118:18 SCX783 B72Q D 30L 100.5 1/18/200113:48 NWA19 B742 D 30L 99.8 1/26/2001 13:16 NWA83 B742 D 30L 99.3 1/21/2001 13:30 NWA19 B742 D 30L 99 1/21/2001 10:48 CCP954 B72Q D 30L 98.7 1/31/20015:29 CCP205 B72Q D 30L 98.6 1/10/2001 12:53 NWA673 B72Q D 30L 98.5 1/15/2001 13:09 NWA19 B742 D 30L 98.3 1/8/20018:36 CCP201 B72Q D 30L 98.3 (RMT Site#6) 252h Ave. & 57th St Minneannlia Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/l De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 1/21/200115:42 NWA720 B72Q D 30R 10341 1/10/200111:19 NWA1271 B72Q D 30R 102.6 1/12/20017:44 UAL1453 B72Q D 30R 102.6 1/6/200111:28 NWA1271 B72Q D 30R 102.4 1/5/200122:19 NWA677 B72Q D 30R 101.8 1/4/200111:36 NWA722 B72Q D 30R 101,5 1/3/20015:37 CCP107 B72Q D 30R 101.3 1/12/200117:30 NWA724 B72Q D 30R 101.2 1/30/200113:23 NWA624 B72 D 30R 101.1 I/20/200120:58 NWA677 B72Q D 30R 101 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program t 19 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAQ Technical Advisor's Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Jan-01 (RMT Site#10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Datefrime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/11/200113:06 NWA19 B742 D 4 99.2 1/5/200114:20 NWA83 B742 D 4 96.7 1/19/200113:01 NWA83 B742 D 4 96.5 1/5/200113:29 NWA19 B744 D 4 95.9 1/19/200113:33 NWA19 B742 D 4 93.9 1/13/200115:24 NWA42 DC10 D 4 91.5 1/9/20019:11 BMJ48 BE80 D 4 91.1 1/4/20015:05 RYN610 B72Q A 22 90.2 1/6/20016:54 BMJ48 BE80 D 4 88.5 1/4/20014:12 UPS556 DCBQ A 22 87A (RMT Site#11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St, Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/19/200113:01 NWA83 B742 D 4 97.8 1/19/200113:33 NWA19 B742 D 4 97.1 1/5/200114:20 NWA83 B742 D 4 93.5 1/11/200113:06 NWA19 B742 D 4 88.1 1/4/200110:39 Unknown Unknown D 12R 86 1/5/200113:29 NWA19 B744 D 4 85.6 1/16/20016:48 BMJ48 BE80 A 30L 82.9 W6/200122:53 NWA1062 DC9Q D 30R 79.5 1/14/200117:29 NWA1429 DC9Q A 12L 79A 1/27/200122:10 NWA612 DC9Q D 30L 79.4 (RMT Site#12) Alton St. &Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number - Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/26/20016:52 BMJ48 BE80 D 12L 90.9 1/22/20018:22 Unknown BE18 D 12L 83.1 1/22/200113:54 Unknown C310 D 12L 78 1/11/20019:28 GLA611 B190 D 12L 77.8 1/14/200117:28 NWA1429 DC9Q A 12L 77 1/4/200110:07 UAL715 B73Q A 12L 76.9 1/11/200115:11 MES2814 SF34 D 12L 76.3 1/26/200112:28 NWA446 A320 A 30R 75.9 1/6/20016:55 BMJ48 BE80 D 4 75.7 1/2/200123:39 NWA688 DC9Q D 30L 75.3 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program t 21 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Top it Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Jan-01 (RMT Site#16) Avalon Ave. &.. Vilas T.ane. Faun Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/4/200110:07 NWA671 Unknown D 12R 97.3 1/29/200118:23 SCX229 B72Q D 12R 96.8 1/13/200112:39 NWA83 B742 D 12R 96.5 1/14/200110:19 CCP101 B72Q D 12R 96.3 1/14/200111:33 CCP954 B72Q D 12R 95.8 1/11/20018:36 CCP201 B72Q D 12R 95.6 1/10/2001 22:12 NWA726 A320 D 12L 95A 1/14/20018:09 SCX789 B72Q D 12R 95A 1/26/20017:16 CCP160 B72Q D 12R 95.3 1/12/20015:14 CCP109 B72Q D 12R 95 (RMT Site#17) Roth St_ X. 4th Ave - Rlnominsrtnrn Date/Time - Flight Number Aircraft Type AmvaU Departure Runway Lmaz (dB) 1/6/2001 12:48 NWA83 B742 D 22 96 1/6/200113:19 NWA19 B742 D 22 95.3 1/10/200113:36 NWA19 B742 D 22 92.6 1/4/2001 13:17 NWA19 B742 D 22 92A 1/10/20015:18 RYN610 B72Q D 22 90.1 1/25/200113:11 NWA19 B742 D 22 89.8 I/2/200112:55 NWA19 B742 D 22 89.6 1/10/2001 15:16 NWA42 DC10 D 22 89 129/200120:02 CDR8685 F28 A 4 88.1 129/200118:10 SCX408 B72Q A 4 87.6 (RMT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave_ Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/30/200116:59 NWA19N Unknown D 22 102.2 1/4/200113:17 NWA19 B742 D 22 99.5 1/25/2001 13:10 NWA19 B742 D 22 97.9 1/6/2001 12:48 NWA83 B742 D 22 97.8 1/2/200112:55 NWA19 B742 D 22 97.5 1/27/200114:55 NWA673 B72Q D 22 97.2 120/2001 13:02 NWA19 B742 D 22 97.1 1/10200113:35 NWA19 B742 D 22 96.5 1/6/2001 13:19 NWA19 B742 D 22 95.7 1/12200121:28 Unknown Unknown D 22 93.2 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program I 23 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top it Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Jan-01 (RMT' Site#22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights Date/1'ime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/6/20016:06 SCX345 B72Q D 12R 86.7 1/10/20015:30 CCP240 B72Q D 12L 85.5 1/4/200110:15 SCX791 B72Q D 12R 85.3 1/10/20017:10 FDX1581 B72Q A 30L 84.3 1/11/200110:10 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 84 1/16/20016;13 Unknown Unknown A 30L 83.5 1/29/200110:34 NWA450 B72Q D 12R 83.3 1/6/20015:36 RYN610 B72Q D 12R 82.9 1/10/2001 21:27 NWA56 B742 D 12R 82.8 1/4/200110:42 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 82.5 (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Avenue, Mendota Heights DatelI'ime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/11/20019:39 NWA671 B72Q D 12L 99.9 1/14/200115:06 NWA720 B72Q D 12L 98.7 1/11/2001 15:09 NWA720. B72Q D 12L 98.6 1/11/200119:09 NWA1272 B72Q D 12L 98.2 1/10/200120:59 NWA1273 B72Q D 12L 97.3 1/11/200120:52 NWA1273 B72Q D 12L 97.1 1/2/200116:56 NWA1245 B72Q D 12L 97 1/26/20017:26 SCX625 B72Q D 12L 96.9 1/4/20019:55 AMT525 B72Q D 12L 96.7 1/13/200110:10 NWA671 B72Q D 12L 96.7 (RMT' Site#24) Chapel Lane &Wren Lane, Eagan Date/1'ime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/6/20016:06 SCX345 B72Q D 12R 91.1 1/11/200111:28 CCP954 B72Q D 12R 90.5 1/4/200110:16 SCX407 B72Q D 12R 90 1/11/200110:09 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 89.7 1/11/2001 9:42 CCP101 B72Q D 12R 89A 122/200110:11 SCX407 B72Q D 12R 89A 1122/200110:18 SCX403 B72Q D 12R 89.2 1/12/20015:15 CCP109 B72Q D 12R 89.1 1/25/200118:36 SCX783 B72Q D 12R 891 1/4/200110:41 SCX227 B72Q D 12R 89 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program k 25 Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Jan-01 (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Avenue S., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type - Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/26/200113:11 DAL1889 B72Q D 30L 94.4 1/12/20016:28 AMT304 B72Q D 30R 92.4 1/26/200111:57 RYN738 B72Q D 30L 92.1 1/29/200117:05 NWA656 DC9Q D 12R 91.1 1/5/200114:37 AAL2022 FI00 D 30L 90.5 1/2 0012130018 KHA1772 B72 D 30L 90.5 1/31/20012221 NWA211 DC9Q D 30L 88.1 1/16/2001 22:17 NWA1462 DC9Q D 30L 87.9 1/14/20018:02 NWA1025 A319 A 12R 87.9 1/24/20010:37 RYN710 B72Q D 30L 87.9 (RMT Site#29) Elicsson Elementary Schnel 4315 31 at AvP C M; Pa h� Date/I'ime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 1/20/200115:24 NWA1644 DC9 D 30R 99.7 1/31/200117:26 CDR8682 F28 D 30R 88.7 1/31/200122:35 KHA1772 B72Q D 30R 88.1 1/23/200118:04 SCX743 B72Q D 30L 87.8 1/18/200120:00 SCX408 B72Q D 30R 87.6 1/31/200113:08 NWA672 B72Q D 30R 87.5 1/24/20017:26 SCX623 B72Q D 30R 87.5 1/7/200113:32 NWA672 B72Q D 30R 87.5 1/22/200119:35 SCX792 B72Q D 30R 87.2 1/5/20018:12 UAL690 B72Q D 30R 87 January 2001 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and. the event ranges at each RMT for January 2001 were comprised of 91.4% departure operations.- The predominant top ten aircraft type was the Boeing 727 Hushed with 61.0% of the highest Lmax events. Note: Unknown fields are due to data unavailability in FAA flight track data. January 2001 Technical Advisor Report Notes Note: Missing FAA radar data for 1.6 days during the month of January 2001. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program � 27 Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) Technical Advisor's Report Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA January 2001 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 1 64.8 49 44.5 42.9 52.1 51.4 53.8 57.4 58.1 44,4 42,9 62.3 61.5 57.2 2 67,8 54.4 56.8 52.1 56.9 51.7 58 68.3 61.9 53 53.8 59.1 65.6 57.1 3 67.9 48.8 60.4 55.2 48.2 42.2 57.9 56.8 62.3 44.8 49.2 63.4 64.7 57.7 4 68.2 67741 54.8 54.6 57.1 59.8 70.6 63.1 56.1 61.7 58.9 62.5 62.1 5 67.6 57.2 64.1 58.5 56.2 39.7 56 55 61A 51.7 46.9 60.6 61.5 57.9 6 67.6 57.3 61.1 57 51.4 47.3 61.5 60.1 65.7 48.1 57.3 60.3 59.6 59 7 65 43 36.51 32.7 1 48.5 42 1 54.3 1 49.9 59.9 349 1 46.3 61 58.4 59.7 8 63.9 52.2 58,9 52 48.9 43.9 53.7 55.5 60.1 45.7 50.5 61.7 59.6 60.1 9 66.2 41.9 45.1 40.1 43.6 46.8 53.5 64.6 60.4 54.5 51.6 61.4 56.6 57.9 10 69.9 60.3 64.5 57.9 48.3 59.5 60.8 71.8 63.6 59.5 63A 59.9 56.7 55.4 11 69,7 47.7 54.5 46.7 n/a 56.4 59.2 72.2 65.1 62.3 58.9 49A 56 n/a 12 69.3 48.3 51.8 44.9 35.5 52.8 55.4 68.1 62.5 51.7 53A 61.5 60 51.7 13 68.7 1 40.9 47.3 33 37.6 53.6 55.2 67.6 56.4 41.3 58.5 n/a 14 69.6 50.6 33.1 44,7 50.5 55.6 55.6 68 57.1 54.4 59.6 54.4 15 67.1 49.9 52.5 54.5 57 33.6 57.2 54.1 56.3 59.7 61 61.3 16 65.5 58.7 53.4 53.2 59.9 38.5 58.2 53.3 160,745,6 48.7 59.8 63 60.1 17 66.2 61.5 64.2 60.8 522 47 55.4 58.1 54 62.4 62.7 61.6 18 68.1 46 51 46.7 58 n/a 58.6 65.4 56,9 62.5 65.7 59.9 19 66,5 49.2 47.4 44.8 52.3 42.1 51.3 53.5 54.5 60.5 61.4 60.7 20 65.9 49.2 58.8 55,6 47.6 49.2 51.4 62.2 59.6 51.1 55.5 59.5 57.5 57.8 21 67.6 58 56,61 43.4 51.5 46.2 56.9 59.8 63.6 52.8 53.6 58.8 60.4 58.1 22 68,9 34.6 49A 42.6 53.2 53A 54.9 69.2 62.3 59A 57.2 56.3 64.7 59,6 23 68.8 5448 60.1 55,1 57.8 43 56.7 61 62.3 55.4 54A 59.2 64A 63.3 24 67.7 49.5 58.5 54.8 47.8 41.1 54.7 53.9 60 46.8 44.8 60.1 64.6 59.2 25 66.5 52.2 60.1 54.1 43 53.8 55.5 68.6 61.2 51.3 58.9 60.2 55.7 54.1 26 70,51 45.7 49A 46.6 54,71 51.4 56.5 62.8 63 55.6 52.8 60.1 64 58.2 27 66.4 51.1 55.9 49.2 53.7 56.3 57 58.9 60.7 51.8 50.6 61.8 61.7 59.3 28 66.6 56.5 65.5 62.5 46.2 55A 56.1 68A 60.7 51.4 57.1 56 57.9 53 29 70.3 59 56.7 43.3 40.2 56.9 57.2 67.9 62.9 59.5 62.2 1 49 1 64.2 144.3 30 69.3 48.8 58.6 44.5 50.7 48.7 56.5 70.2 63 52.4 55 581 61 69.5 56.4 52.2 49.3 58.4 32.8 58.7 58.5 63 52.7 50 64.3 66.3o. H57.631 Ldn 68.0 54.6 59.0 54.1 53.5 52.3 57:0 66.1 62.1 54.9 56.4 60,2 62.2 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program t 29 MASAC Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis K'Ui JLL 090 Heading J. \ 1!: d (' lr�l N� e:_• f I _ _ Metropolitan Airports Commission 4487 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in November 2000 4122 (91.9%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor 4437 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 4122 (91.9%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St, Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In Corridor 11/01/2000 00:00:00 - 12/01/2000 00:00:00 4122 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1779 (43.2 % ), Right = 2343 (56.8%) d 6000 LL 5000..................:...................:.................................... •° q p0O m 4000 ..� O .... I ut 3000 .. ..... ®� EL 2000 .. ......... �✓a ...... ....... a c c _ - > U 1000 ..... b.. :+................ O a 0 -2 -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) + Arrival O Departure ❑ Overflights Pay*e L Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis an Airports Commission Paee 2 �.5%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were orth of the 0900 Corridor Boundary During November 2000 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate NorthCornuor 11/01/2000 00:00:00 - 12/01/2000 070:00:00 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1 (4.5 % ), Right = 21 (95.5 % ) a a� 6000 LL 5000 0 4000 -.._. ._... ................ ................. d w 3000 ........_.. ...... ........ ..__..:. 2000 -. O C _ o > 1000 0 _....................... a 0 -2 -1 0 1 2 (Runway End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End) + Arrival _ Departure ❑ Overflight3 L --.,Kmlty " . uirvrenuo[a neients 1Jeparture Corridor Analysis COMMiSS 7e6%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 'on of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During November 2000 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South_Corridor 11/112000 343 Tracks Crossed Gate: OLeft 184 (53 60%),ORight 0159 (46.4%) 6000 d 5000.................................... ......... 0 m 4000 ...0 .... O ........... 0 3000 V O GD0 ®....p _........ ° 2000��� O 0 1000 MO ..... 0 O -2 _1 (Corridor End) 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid-Pom) + Arrival O. Departure ❑ Overflight: Monthly EaeanNfendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Pale PuQe 4 vn Airports Commission %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 50 \f the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) During November 2000 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South_ Corridor 11/01/2000 00:00:00 - 12/01/2000 00:00:00 12 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 12 (100.0 % ), Right = 0 (0.o%) d 6000 LL 5000 0 4000 ... .0....0.. ..: O w 3000 ........... `o O O O O: ° 2000 ...... .00..... Q ..o...O........:... .. . o 1000I. ............ .... a a 0, -2 -1 0 (Corridor End) 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid-Poinol r Arrival O Departure ❑ Overflights - - � ••-�•„-�«<�� � UCpanure k�orndor Analysis Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for November 2000 ORD Chicago - O'Hare 1240 282 6.3% STL St. Louis 1600 134 3.0% DEN Denver 2370 123 2.7% DTW Detroit 1050 112 2.5% DEW Dallas - Ft. Worth 1930 111 2.5% MDW Chicago - Midway 1240 97 2.2% ATL Atlanta 1490 92 2.1% EWR Newark 1060 87 1.9% CVG Cincinnati 1270 83 1.8% SEA Seattle 2780 77 1.7% FAR Fargo 3120 76 1.7% IAH Houston 1850 73 1.6% MKE Milwaukee 1140 72 1.6% MCI Kansas City 1880 68 1.5% LAS Los Angeles 7430 67 1.5% Monthly EaganNlendota Hei=hts Departure Corridor Analysis Page 5 1• • �• tit MASAC Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis mot....... ,.;,. All =2 Al \ d fIff- •., \, If OE rf Metropolitan Airports Commission 5203 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in December 2000 4868 (93.6 %) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor 5203 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 4868 (93.6%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In -Corridor 12/01/2000 00:00:00 - 01/01/2001 00:00:00 4868 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1955 (40.2 % ), Right = 2913 (59,8%a) 6000 L c 5000..................:...................:..................:.................. 0 w3000 e 2000 4444 r dd 0 1000 ....44b. 1. 1 1 1..+ . u i ........ _ - a 0 -2 -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) + Arrival Departure ❑ Overflights Monthly Eagan/Nlendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page I Metropolitan Airports Commission 26 (0.5 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were North of the 0900 Corridor Boundary During December 2000 ra_ �., =_ a Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate North_Corridor 12/01/2000 00:00:00 - 01/01/2001 00:00:00 26 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1 (3.8 % ), Right = 25 (96.2 %) 6000 m 5000 c 0 m 4000 m w 3000 0 ° 2000 a 1000 0 a 0 -z (Runway End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End) + Arrival Departure 0 Overflight Page 2 D[onthly Eagan[ivlendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Metropolitan Airports Commission 309 (6.0%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During December 2000 09 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left 180 (58.3%) Right cccb s000 5000 c 0 m 4000 m w 3000 `o °- 2000 > 1000 n° 0 —2 2 (Corridor End) Deviation Prom Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY b(id-Poinq + Arrival Departure El Overflight Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Pave Metropolitan Airports Commission 15 (0.3%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° South of the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) During December 2000 Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor 5deq s000 5000........................................... 0 m4000..................:....................................:.................. O O w 3000 . g �......... _ :................. . 0 00 O ° 2000 . 0.......0........................;..................;.................. 4 O O � 1000 ........................ 0 a 0 —2 —1 0 1 2 (Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point + Arrival 0 Departure ❑ Overflights M Pave 4 onthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for December 2000 o Percent of ORD Chicago - O'Hare 1240 148 2.8% DTW Detroit 1050 114 2.2% ATL Atlanta 1490 103 2.0% STL St. Louis 1600 99 1.9% MDW Chicago - Midway 1240 90 1.7% DFW Dallas - Ft. Worth 1930 79 1.5% PHX Phoenix 2310 77 1.5% MKE Milwaukee 1140 75 1.4% EWR Newark 1060 74 1.4%o MCI Kansas City 1880 72 1.4% SEA Seattle 2780 _ 72 1.4% LAX Los Angeles 2380 69 1.3% DEN Denver 2370 68 1.3% PHL Philadelphia 1110 68 1.3% IAH Houston 1850 61 1.2% Monthly Ea�anMendota Heights Departure Coaidor Analysis Page 5 January 2001 MASAC Eagan/1Vlendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis mil( qq 090 Headrng' j� AGO olio. A. Cyr:'•.. J' 3 r l Metropolitan Airports Commission 4 (0.1 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were North of the 0900 Corridor Boundary During January 2001 Penetration Gate Plot for Gate North Corridor 01/01/2001 00:00:00 - 02/01/2001 00:00:00 4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 0 (0.0 % ), Right = 4 (100.0 % ) 6000 m d 5000 0 4000 m w 3000 `o a 2000 1>1 1000 0 to a 0 -z (Runway End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End i Arrival 0 Departure 0 Overflight Page 2 Monthly EaganMendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Metropolitan Airports Commission 268 (7.6 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During January 2001 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor 01/01/2001 00:00:00 - 02/01/2001 00:00:00 268 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 125 (46.7 %), Right = 143 (53.3%) d 6000 m a5000....._...........:.__.............;._............... ......... c o Ta4000.._......_._.....................:...............,..;.. ......_ . o O O wa 3000 ...O...._ ...... '0Oo ... . C ^>' 1000 O 0Q . ^ O _..... °o O 0 a 0 —2 —1 0 1 2 (Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point) + Arrival O Departure Cl Overflights Monthly Ea,oan/Nlendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Paoe 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission 9 (0.3 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° South of the Corridor (5° South of 30L Localizer) During January 2001 a ]m N 0 0 {,, �. Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South_ Corridor_5deg 01 /01 /2001 00:00:00 - 02/01 /2001 00:00:00 9 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 9 (100.0 %), Right = 0 (0.0 % ) 6000 ai LL 5000 ' C O w3000 .............:..................:..................:.................. 0 0 Q 2000 ..CD- + - +.. Q 00 > 1 000 ............... ...:.................................................. .... 0 a Q n _2 (Corridor End) -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid-Poin Pace 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for January 2001 irport city (deg.) i, Total i, ORD Chicago - O'Hare 1240 220 6.2% DFW Dallas - Ft. Worth 1930 104 2.9% DEN Denver 2370 103 2.9% STL St. Louis 1600 93 2.6% DTW Detroit 1050 90 2.5% MDW Chicago - Midway 1240 72 2.0% PHX Phoenix 2310 71 2.0% IAH Houston 1850 65 1.8% MKE Milwaukee 1140 65 1.8% EWR Newark 1060 64 1.8% MCI Kansas City 1880 59 1.7% LGA New York - La Gaurdia 1050 56 1.6% CLE Cleveland logo 55 1.6% CVG Cincinnati 1270 53 1.5% LAX Los Angeles 2380 52 1.5% Monthly Eagan/Niendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 5 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS CONLNIISSION ?" F2� t o 3 2 t t N � f t,Aao Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 f Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 Cari Lindberg City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms. Lindberg: January 26, 2001 The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is entering the final eighteen months of implementation within the certified 1996 DNL65 Noise Contour. Certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1991, the 1996 DNL65 Noise Exposure Map is the currently approved noise contour that defines eligibility in the MAC Part 150 Program However, as you know, the MAC is in the process of completing a Part 150 Program update requesting approval from the FAA to expand the current program area (2005 DNL60 Noise Contour). This update will be based on forecasted 2005 airport configuration and use, airline fleet mix, airspace use and proposed noise reduction measures. It is important to know that if a new contour is certified and approved by the FAA, the current boundaries of the program area may change, and homeowners may lose their eligibility to participate. MAC wants to be sure households that declined the original invitation to participate in the program, or started the process but then put their project on hold, are afforded another opportunity to take advantage of the program. Over the next several weeks, MAC will mail letters of final invitation to approximately 450 households in the communities of Eagan, Mendota Heights, Minneapolis, and Richfield. Enclosed for your information are samples of the letters, as well as a list of Mendota Heights homeowners to whom the letter will be mailed. We anticipate mailing the letters starting February 5, 2001. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 612-726-8133 or Mary Raasch, Center for Energy and Environment, at 612-725-6251, S-inc`erely, c3Y44j�s John Nelson FAR Part 150 Program Manager Metropolitan Airports Commission r e lIatropolievr Airports Commission is an aftiunatiee action employer. �� r� r�.mspairportcom Relic�rr :\irp„rts: .-11 P\L\k:E •.-\\'OI:.\ COU\TY/6LAt\E • CRYST.-1L • FLl'1.\'G CLOUD • L.\l;E f:L CIO • SAI\T P-\L'L UOit-\TCIt\:\ SIP FILE NO. H0100 H0097 H0098 H0099 H0101 H0104 H0094 H0102 H0077 H0056 H0095 H0103 H0058 H0085 Grand Total = 14 MAC PART 150 SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM FINAL LETTER OF INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS OWNER LAST NAME ADDRESS BLOCK PRIORITY MCNEIL 1455 E. PERRON ROAD 2 BILLMEYER 2311 WATERS DR 2 BUROW 2351 PILOT KNOB ROAD 2 KREITZ 2359 PILOT KNOB ROAD 2 BHAKPA 2180 HIGHWAY 13 8 WILLIAMS 2401 LEXINGTON AVE SO 14 GAUW 1189 ROGERS ROAD 17 PABST 980 WAGON WHEEL TRAIL 20 CEMENSKY 2343 SWAN DRIVE 22 PALME 1053 WAGON WHEEL TRAIL 23 BOHRER 1057 WAGON WHEEL TRAIL 23 ANDERSON 1062 CULLEN AVE 23 WOHLERS 2218 LEXINGTON AVE SO 23 KULHANEK 953 WAGON WHEEL TRAIL 24 Note: Mailings will be addressed to "Current Resident" as well as to the names listed above to assure that the letters get delivered to the address. 1/26/01 Page 1 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION is Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport t 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis,MN 55450-2799 a �: Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 0 t„ Letter 1 Mailed to Homeowners Who Were Invited to Orientation - Did Not Attend or Did Not Sign Up Dear Homeowner: The purpose of this letter is notify you that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is entering the final eighteen months of implementation within the certified 1996 DNL 65 noise contour. Certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1991, the 1996 DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map is the currently approved noise contour that defines eligibility in the MAC Part 150 Program. However, you may be aware that MAC is in the process of completing a Part 150 Program update requesting approval from the FAA to expand the current program area (2005 )NL 60 noise contour). This update will be based on forecasted 2005 airport configuration and use, airline fleet mix, airspace use and proposed noise reduction measures. It is important to know that if a new contour is certified and approved by the FAA, the boundaries of the program area may change, and you may lose your eligibility to participate. Our records show that some time ago the MAC sent you (or the previous homeowner) a written invitation to participate in the program, which was declined. The MAC would like to extend a final invitation to you to resume participation. Please respond no later than <<30 days from mail. date>> by completing and mailing the enclosed postage -paid "Final Invitation RSVP" postcard. If you are interested in the program, staff from MAC's consultant, the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) will contact you within the next few months to initiate the process. If MAC does not receive your RSVP by <<30 days from mail date>>, MAC can not guarantee your future participation in the program. Please be advised that program participation is voluntary. If you have questions regarding the Sound Insulation Program, Mary Raasch -CEE Manager of Homeowner/Community Affairs, can be reached by e-mail at mraasch(c�mncee.oro or by phone at 612-725-6251, Sincerely, Iohn Nelson Part 150 Program Manager Metropolitan Airports Commission The YlNropolitan Airports Commission is an aEfirmaHve action employer. �� o r�.mspairport.mm Relic�er .-\irporc.: .a'R_YKE •.-1 \'OI:.Y COLFiTY/6LA(YF • CRYST.�L • FLYI\G CtOUD •LAKE EL\(O • SAIVT ['AUL COt\'�-i06V\ *,sSAY *t�o METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue Sou[h • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 LEtter 2 Mailed to Homeowners Who Did Not Make IAQ Corrections in 70 Days The purpose of this letter is notify you that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is entering the final eighteen months of implementation within the certified 1996 DNL 65 noise contour. Certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1991, the 1996 DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map is the currently approved noise contour that defines eligibility in the MAC Part 150 Program. However, you may be aware that MAC is in the process of completing a Part 150 Program update requesting approval from the FAA to expand the current program area (2005 )NL 60 noise contour). This update will be based on forecasted 2005 airport configuration and use, airline fleet mix, airspace use and proposed noise reduction measures. It is important to know that if a new contour is certified and approved by the FAA, the boundaries of the program area may change, and you may lose your eligibility to participate. Our records show that your project is in "inactive status" pending the correction of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) deficiencies that resulted from an IAQ PreTest conducted some time ago. If you are interested in receiving sound insulation modifications, the MAC would like to extend a final invitation to you to resume participation. Please respond no later than <<30 days from mail date>> by completing and mailing the enclosed postage -paid "Final Invitation RSVP" postcard. If you are interested in the program, staff from MAC's consultant, the Center for Energy and Environment, (CEE) will contact you within the next few months to discuss the best way to resume the process. After <<30 days from mail date>>, MAC can not guarantee your future participation in the program. Please be advised that program participation is voluntary. If you have questions regarding the Sound Insulation Program, contact Mary Raasch -CEE Manager of Homeowner/Community Affairs - by e-mail at mmasch�ir�.mncee.oro or by phone at 612-725-6251. If you have questions about your IAQ PreTest or how to correct deficiencies resulting from the PreTest, contact Paul Morin — CEE Senior IAQ Technician at pmorinia.mncee.oro or 612-726-5943. If you are ready to schedule an IAQ Retest, contact Janet Fisk — IAQ Administrative Coordinator at 612-726-5940. Sincerely, John Nelson Part I50 Program Manager Metropolitan Airports Commission the klrtropolitan Airpor!s Commission is an affirmative action employer. !. n w.mspairporsom 2elie.er Airpor!s: AIRLAKE • A�OKA COLIiV'TY/BLrllVE • CFYSTAL • FLl'l\G CLOI'D •LAKE EL\IO • Ss\f�T PALL De�W\"TO�V\ METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMNIISSION + tj� F r 't t 0 Dear Homeowner: Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 Letter 3 Mailed to Homeowners Who Are Remodeling or Maldng Repairs The purpose of this letter is notify you that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is entering the final eighteen months of implementation within the certified 1996 DNL 65 noise contour. Certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1991, the 1996 DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map is the currently approved noise contour that defines eligibility in the MAC Part 150 Program. However, you may be aware that MAC is in the process of completing a Part 150 Program update requesting approval from the FAA to expand the current program area (2005 )NL 60 noise contour). This update will be based on forecasted 2005 airport configuration and use, airline fleet mix, airspace use and proposed noise reduction measures. It is important to know that if a new contour is certified and approved by the FAA, the boundaries of the program area may change, and you may lose your eligibility to participate. Our records show that your project is in "inactive status" pending the completion of remodeling/repair work you had scheduled to be performed on your home. If you are interested in receiving sound insulation modifications, the MAC would like to extend a final invitation to you to resume participation. Please respond no later than «30 days from mail date» by completing and mailing the enclosed postage -paid "Final Invitation RSVP" postcard. If you are interested in the program, staff from MAC's consultant, the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) will contact you within the next few months to discuss the best way to resume the process. After <<30 days from mail date>>, MAC can not guarantee your future participation in the program. Please be advised that program participation is voluntary. If you have questions regarding the Sound Insulation Program, Mary Raasch -CEE Manager of Homeowner/Community Affairs can be reached by e-mail at mraaschmm�cee_or� or by phone at 612-725-6251. Sincerely, John Nelson Part 150 Program Manager Metropolitan Airports Commission The .Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. wa m.mspairportcom C.eliever Airports: .-\12La. [<E •.a.\OK-\COUVTY/6LAL�E •CRYST.a.L •FLYI\G CLOIiD •L4KE EL�IO •SA!\T P.-\l.'L E`OlV\'I(�1t'\ ppt 5 a,HT h � r z _r o 11 t„ a t T Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Phone (612) 726-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 Letter 4 Mailed to Homeowners Who Put Their Project On Hold for No Specific Reason The purpose of this letter is notify you that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is entering the final eighteen months of implementation within the certified 1996 DNL 65 noise contour. Certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1991, the 1996 DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map is the currently approved noise contour that defines eligibility in the MAC Part 150 Program. However, you may be aware that MAC is in the process of completing a Part 150 Program update requesting approval from the FAA to expand the current program area (2005 )NL 60 noise contour). This update will be based on forecasted 2005 airport configuration and use, airline fleet mix, airspace use and proposed noise reduction measures. It is important to know that if a new contour is certified and approved by the FAA, the boundaries of the program area may change, and you may lose your eligibility to participate. Our records show that your project has been in "inactive status" for some time. The MAC would like to extend a final invitation to you to resume participation. Please respond no later than <<30 days from mail date>> by completing and mailing the enclosed postage -paid "Final Invitation RSVP" postcard. If you are interested in the program, staff from MAC's consultant, the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) will contact you within the next few months to discuss the best way to resume the process. If MAC does not receive your RSVP by <<30 days from mail date>>, MAC can not guarantee your future participation in the program. Please be advised that program participation is voluntary. If you have questions regarding the Sound Insulation Program, Mary Raasch -CEE Manager of Homeowner/Community Affairs, can be reached by email at rnraaschna.mncee.ore or by phone at 612-725-6251, Sincerely, John Nelson Part I50 Program Manager Metropolitan Airports Commission The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. www.mspairport.com Reliever Airpors: AIFLAKE • A�'OKA CO[J�+TY/SLAI,\E • CRYST.\L • FLYI\G CLOID • t:1KE ELMO • S.\IVT P:1tl. DON' �TOlV\ O m Z�aZ mWz�l D a O m oy—mn O2 Z-A G C mr, ZU)D4 Z - om O� pZ G0 Dm 3Z 0 z Z 9 m z y O � n z�oZ m z -i O mn = Z mi n < r m Zu1 iz O m � ;u z U o ;o O > Z 7o D m 3 z G X O Z 3 m z -i iu z ZZ z_mmo m ZKov O y>Wm ym�m> y y O x c) m ' m N m Qy CIO H cn 3 Z rm 1: N ti a T ' N O m O =_z o Q AVIATION POLICY PLAN UPDATE 2000-2020 February 14, 2001 8:30 to 10:30 a.m. Council Chambers Metropolitan Council Offices Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 AGENDA 1. Call to Order —Review Minutes of January 17, 2001 Meeting 2. Presentation on National/Local Air Cargo Developments (Steve Anderson — Twin Cities Airports Task Force/MAC) 3. Review of Revised General Aviation Draft Forecasts 4. Review of Revised Issue Paper on Land Use Compatibility for Noise 5. Background Information: Airline Competition -Consolidation Hubs of Commerce — Air Cargo World Squeezing the Heartland — Air Cargo World 6. Other Business: - Overview of FAA Class B Airspace Expansion Proposal for MSP - Presentation on Farmington & Gopher VOR Protection. 7. Public Appearances: Barbara Haake —Environmental Issue Presentation AVIATION POLICY PLAN UPDATE 2000 — 2020 TASK FORCE MINUTES MEETING OF January 17, 2001 Call to Order: Meeting was called to order by chair Todd Paulson. Minutes of November 29, 2000 meeting approved. 2. Aviation Forecasts: Pat Kennon of HNTB gave a presentation on results of both the MSP Forecast Evaluation effort and the General Aviation system forecasts. This presentation touched upon the key forecast elements, the forecast process, inputs and performance, and also the short and long-term forecast factors. He highlighted that the 1993 Combination 2 [high) forecast scenario has become the new baseline forecast as used in the MSP FEIS for the 2010 airport development plan. The scenario is characterized by expectations that — economic growth is 50% higher than projected, no decline in connecting ratio, high international growth, and low diversion of regional airline activity. Graphs of regional income and employment indicate high growth. Airline yield in MSP market shows slight decline due to effect of new low cost carrier service. Domestic originations show growth above high forecast due to new Sun Country service activity. Ratio of originations to enplanements is not increasing as much as in the 90's, growth is slowing while cost of service [e.g. fuel is causing increase in fares. Projected aircraft operations have followed high forecast with some temporary dampening due to NWA pilot work action. The increase in operations comes at a time of very high load factors and introduction of regional jets replacing turboprop aircraft; additional growth spurt could occur depending on how fleets are utilized. FAA 1993 terminal area forecasts on passenger enplanements show a good correspondence with the high local forecast and their 2000 forecast projects continued high growth through 2015. For comparison with aircraft operations, the FAA forecasts also indicate a high level of activity. There is some definitional issues with FAA counting of some airline flights as general aviation that needs to be sorted out. Near Term Forecast Factors: • Rate of economic growth —appears to be slowing. NWA investment in Detroit and Memphis — implies significant growth. NWA fleet renewal — DC-10 replacements ordered, DC-9 replacements to be selected. Scope clauses — determines how many regional jets serve MSP. Low cost carriers — new carriers in service. • Slot relaxation at ORD—allows additional competition to city pairs. • Airline consolidation/alliances— major proposals in play, under government review. • National airspace system — if it does not get done will constrain forecasts. Long Term Forecast Factors: • Rate of economic growth —appears positive. Aging of baby boom generation — question of replacing workers to sustain economic growth. • Changing settlement patterns — potential for urban to rural shift. • Limits of yield management — very high load factors, and pressure to increase market share. National airspace system — an on -going issue. Capacity at other airports — new runway capacity added between 1991 — 2007 at many major airports, but what is on MSP city -pairs. Advances in aviation technology— on -going. Alternative transportation modes— possible specialized airports for new aircraft types, high speed rai 1. • Changing attitudes towards travel — change in peoples interest, change in disposable income. • Fuel cost and availability— how far ahead of time is effect felt on flying. Environmental factors —potential re -regulation. • Globalization — changing business connections from the historical experience. 2/I4/0I AGENDA ITEM 4 AVIATION POLICY PLAN UPDATE 2000-2020 Background: Land Use Compatibility for Noise: Attached is a copy of the proposed changes to the land use compatibility guidelines for aircraft noise. The potential effects of this proposal varies by airport since implementation is tied directly to the type and location of the aircraft noise impact zones specific to the particular airport. The issue paper addressing this proposed change to the aviation guide was previously mailed to all potentially affected communities for their information and potential input to the task force. The issue paper is being mailed again to the communities prior to action by the task force at the February meeting. For those communities that need additional time to review the document there will be further opportunities for input during the policy plan update process. Recommendation: It is recommended that: 1. The attached issue paper be accepted by the task force; 2. The document be submitted for formal consideration in the update and adoption of the Aviation Policy Plan. sound level as it rises and falls over the stated time period. Leq is ofren presented for consecutive one - hour periods to illustrate how the hourly noise dose rises and falls throughout a 24-hour period as well as how a few loud aircrafr significantly affect certain hours. Day -Night Average Sound Leve1(DNL) The Day -Night Average Sound Level (DNL) represents noise as it occurs over a 24-hour period averaged over a year. It is the same as a 24-hour equivalent sound level (Leq), with one important exception: DNL treats nighttime noise differently from daytime noise. In calculating DNL, it is assumed that the A - weighted level from an aircraft operating at night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) is 10 dBA louder than it actually is. This penalty is equivalent to 10 simultaneous flights by that same aircraft in the daytime. The nighttime penalty is applied to account for the sensitivity of residents to nighttime noise. An aircraft event at night is generally perceived as more intrusive and annoying than a comparable event during the day because it is more likely to interrupt sleep, relaxation or other activities and the background noise level is lower. DNL is therefore not the sound level that people actually hear — it is an average of the cumulative sound levels over a 24-hour period. The DNL metric was developed under the auspices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure the impact of multiple noise events in an average day. It is the logarithmic average of sound levels in dBA and is based on a 24-hour Leq. DNL (also known as Ldn) has been equated through social surveys with public reactions to different noise levels. The DNL metric is recognized by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Department of Defense as the proper basis for land use planning around airports. The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) evaluated DNL as a noise measurement tool. The FICON 1992 report noted that there "aze no new descriptors or metrics of sufficient scientific standing to substitute for the present DNL cumulative noise exposure metric," and that DNL methodology "is considered the proper one for civil and military aviation scenarios in the general vicinity of airports". The FICON report noted that "aircraft noise predictions below DNL 65 dBA can be less accurate and should be interpreted with caution". The FAA has developed the Integrated Noise Model (INM) for the calculation of DNL. The INM mode] takes into account flight paths, number of operations, and the flyover noise associated with specific aircraft types on a given flight path corrected for the duration of the sound. Contours of equal DNL value are then developed and mapped, reflecting the average noise of takeoffs and landings over a year's time. APP Noise Exposure Zones The APP has 4 Noise Exposure Zones (NEZs) for determining land use compatibility. • NEZ 1 contains the land within the DNL 75+noise contour • NEZ 2 contains the land within the DNL 70-75 noise contour • NEZ 3 contains the land within the DNL 65-70 noise contour • NEZ 4 contains the land within the DNL 60-65 noise contour APP Land Use Com�tibility Guidelines The Council's land use compatibility guidelines, as amended February 23, 2000, aze presented in Table i. The definitions of the terms in the guidelines are as follows: 2 New Development A relatively large, undeveloped tract of land proposed for development. Major Redevelopment A relatively large parcel of land with old structures proposed for extensive rehabilitation or for demolition and different uses. lnfill Development Undeveloped parcel or parcels of land proposed for development similar to surrounding existing development. Consistent Land Use ,and use designated as consistent in Table 1 is compatible with aircraft noise and therefore acceptable for inclusion in the city's comprehensive plan within that Noise Exposure Zone. Inconsistent Land Use Land use designated as inconsistent in Table 1 is incompatible with aircraft noise and therefore not acceptable for inclusion in the city's comprehensive plan within that Noise Exposure Zone. Provisional Land Use Land use designated as provisional in Table 1 is consistent if the structure is constructed such that it will provide the indoor sound level specified in Table 2. For example, a single family residence in NEZ 3 (DNL 65-70) must be constructed so that it will provide an outdoor -to -indoor noise attenuation of 25 dBA in order to attain the indoor sound level of 45 dBA. Structures normally occupied by people must comply with the structure performance standards specified in the Minnesota Aircraft Noise Attenuation Act for the metropolitan area, MS 473.192. These standards for the cited land uses are given in Table 2. The proposed land use is acceptable if the city adopts the applicable structure standards in the form of an ordinance. Table 2 Structure Performance Standards' Land Use Interior Sound Level Residential 45dBA Educational/Medical 45dBA Cultural/Entertainment/Recreational 50dBA Office/Commercial/Retail Services 50dBA Services 50dBA Industrial/Communication/Utility 60dBA Agricultural Land/Water Areas/Resource Extraction 65dBA Applies only to structures normally occupied by people. Conditional Land Use Land use designated as conditional in Table 1 is consistent if (a) it will meet the applicable structure performance standard in Table 2 and (b) it can adequately address eight land use review factors. The eight land use review factors are; The specific nature of the proposed use, including extent of associated outdoor activities. . with the windows closed and partly open, respectively. Sleep interference at night can occur at outdoor levels of 55 dBA. Sleep and speech interference from aircraft noise results in varying degrees of annoyance. Social survey data make it clear that an individual's reaction to noise varies widely for a given noise level. Nevertheless, the survey data show that the aggregate response of people as a group is predictable and relates well to the DNL metric. Figure 1 shows the most widely recognized relationship between DNL levels and community annoyance as recommended by FICON.` It is the basis for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for noise -sensitive land uses. DNL 65 is the level at which noise -sensitive land uses are considered incompatible by FAA and other federal agencies; it correlates with 12.29% of the surveyed people being highly annoyed. As previously noted, the DNL metric is an annual average daily value; it does not predict how often the noise level exceeds levels that could interfere with speech communication or sleep. The degree of interference/annoyance varies according to the location of the individual with respect to the location of amval and departure flight tracks and their frequency of use by noisy aircraft. It is not unusual for a person living under a major jet flight track in the DNL 60-65 contour to be as highly annoyed (or more so) as a person in the DNL 65-70 contour that does not reside under the same or similar flight track. The curve in Figure 1 shows that at the DNL 60-65 level, between 6.48%and 12% of the surveyed people are highly annoyed, compared to 12.29 percent highly annoyed at the DNL 65 level. Also, a person living in the DNL 60-65 contour and adjacent and parallel to a runway at MSP, will be subjected to sideline or low frequency noise from large commercial aircraft that can be more intrusive and annoying than overflight noise —because it includes vibration of the stmcture in addition to noise. The degree of vibration and corresponding level of annoyance increases the closer one is to the runway. Based on this discussion, the proposed Conditional Land Use Review Factors for determining the compatibility of conditional land uses around all airports are given in Table 3. The local government would apply the factors to the conditional land use under consideration to assess whether or not to include it in the comprehensive plan. The proposed use would be included if it were found compatible for each factor. � Federal Interagency Conunittee on Noise, 1992 report 3 g & u 2[ 6 u J = } § _ k / - /ro k}(\\( ) a )( )( E ¥ Fri Az£� ( }( R )}}))/\.\ ƒkta3 WJ,: Olt rls Q V Ny Elm m N FEi G z C F ItI'll"U OI C (! O O.. la, d 'OBI; U V Pr U U, l.T U, p y .--. U. O O O C O .N.O V: .G�� .G x Cli[U z ^'i O 0 GI ED G a; a. a c(Ell G7 .�- G G C G G G C C C q L A O\Ell O O r « Ell,O .� .� m mG .... ; .4O O ' C Ell E'llrz _ I,lldt C4 U loll U P GL :0i; . CzU V Ell Ell ^ C G FI C C CCook Cj Ella -6—b 'O 'O 'O 'O U V U U U U CM U U U U r-4 lllEl 6 Q c o 0 o m of It CEP o > ECi c..: > I i G � cF c E a U Ilddl p > c v ;N .� ... .-. .-. .-. er v r L L. C C C C C C y �ii 0 0 O O O O +- U .O .= %= y y m Ell a > C F >O F C' C 0 0 ti ti ti 4 pC 0 G °. w a r U U a a w P. all A c:I �'r .c; ti L L N O O O O m _' O O ,C C O .OS'p E� > G > > E z 2 uci �,' o ° o o o A+ — m o .o VIE•C C C C C G G G >O Ell C C• m .li �� U U P. CJ .�„ FI C "wq �G G T 3 R Ell u aW aWwllq 7 Q m r�R .... �L^ rOi Q. v O P^ C u O a N ti m O U U m X a ay o .a rxj O m U � O U O Oc ,m U a U y .... �. 4. O CO EleE y tE, II C RESCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING' WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2001 =1:00 P.M. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION Room 3040 — Mezzanine — Lindbergh Terminal Building AGENDA Oath of Office -New Commissioners (Consent Hems can be brought down to Discussion) Approval of Minutes - Regular Scheduled January 16. 2001 Lease Actions a - Recommendation Re: Airport Leases Accounts a - Approval of Bills, Expenses, Payrolls, Transfers of Funds, etc. Planning and Environment Committee Al Land Acquisition - Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport a) Army Reserve Property b) Minneapolis Park Board Property c) Department of Veterans Affairs A2 Property Acquisition - Airlake Airport A3 Final Payments - MAC Contracts a) Automated People Mover Tunnel (Finishes) b) Lindbergh Terminal 1999 Mechanical Modifications c) Tug Door Replacement d) Tug Drive Floor Rehabilitation Phase II e) 2000 Utility Modifications f) Parking Expansion: Core Enclosure/Finishes, QTA, Ramp Stair Enclosure g) ParkinglRAC Expansion: NWA Replacement Ramp h) 62nd St, Relocation/Deicing Operations Center Site Work 1) 1999 Landside Bituminous Construction j) Parking Structure Rehabilitation 2000 k) 1999 Runway 17-35 Storm Sewer 1) Runway 14-32 Taxiway P Pavement Rehabilitation - St. Paul Downtown Airport m) Anoka County/Blaine Airport: Sanitary Sewer and Water Installation n) 2000 Part 150 Sound Insulation Program A4 Semi -Final Payments - MAC Contracts a) Airfield Lighting Computer Control System b) Parking Expansion: Snowmelt System c) Parking Expansion: RAC Exit Ramp d) Airlake Airport: North Parallel Taxiway Realignment A5 Bids Received - MAC Contracts a) 2001 Fuel System Extension b) Lindbergh Terminal Elevator Modifications c) 2001 Runway 17-35 Site Preparation d) 2001 Runway 17-35 Trunk Storm Sewer, Phase 3: Water Quality Ponds e) Part 150 Sound Insulation Program - January Bid Cycle A6 Change Management Policy and Project Status Report A7 December 2000 Activity report for Metro Office Park A8 Capital Improvement Program Adjustments PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Roger Hale, Chair Alton Gasper, Vice Chair Coral Houle Dick Long Bert McKasy Paul Weske METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:45 p.m. Room 3040, Mezzanine Level Lindbergh Terminal, Woid-Chamberlain Field AGENDA BIDS RECEIVED —MAC CONTRACTS a. New HHH Terminal Bid Package No. 6 — Miscellaneous Site Work Dennis Probst, Director— Landside Development Materials regarding this item will be forwarded to Commissioners prior to the Special Meeting. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Roger Hale, Chair Alton Gasper, Vice Chair William Erhart Coral Houle Dick Long Bert McKasy Paul Weske METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, March S, 2001 1:00 p.m. Room 3040 Mezzanine Level Lindbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field AGENDA CONSENT 1. FINAL PAYMENTS — MAC CONTRACTS a. Runway 12R-30L Rehabilitation — Segment 2 (Bridget Rief, Airside Project Manager) b. Runway 12R-30L Tunnel Asbestos Abatement (Robert Vorpahl, Program Development Engineer) C. Parking Expansion — Parking APM Tunnel and Center Core Structure (Dennis Kowalke, Landside Project Manager) d. Part 150 Sound Insulation Program — 1998 Asbestos Abatement (Joseph Shortreed, Landside Project Manager) e. Runway 14 Instrument Landing System — St. Paul Downtown Airport (Bridget Rief, Airside Project Manager) f. LeJuene Bolt Building Demolition — Airlake Airport (Robert Vorpahl, Program Development Engineer) g. 2000 Part 150 Sound Insulation Program (Joseph Shortreed, Landside Project Manager) 2. SEMI-FINAL PAYMENTS — MAC CONTRACTS a. Green Concourse Expansion — Phase I (Dennis Kowalke, Landside Project Manager) b. MSP Airport Mail Center — Foundations/Steel (Robert Vorpahl, Program Development Engineer) DISCUSSION 13. PROJECT BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Dennis Probst, Director—Landside Development Gary G. Warren, Director—Airside Development 14. PART 150 SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM — 60-64 DNL CONTOUR Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director — Planning and Environment 15. LRT UPDATE Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director — Planning and Environment 16. MASAC UPDATE Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director To: Kathy Swanson From: Metropolitan Airports Comm. 02-19-2001 10:14AM EST p. 1 MEDIA ADVISORY Monday, February 19, 2001 Contact: Amy von Walter 612-726-8172 BRIEFING ON MSP 2010: BUILDING A BETTER AIRpOI2T The Metropolitan Airports Commission Will host a briefing on upcoming construction activities at Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport that may impact travelers and surrounding communities. The briefing Will last about an hour and will be followed by a question and answer session. WHEN: 2:30 p.m., Thursday, February 22 WHO: Gary Warren, director of Airside Development Denny Probst, director of Landside Development WHBR1;: Commission Chambers Minneapolis -St, Paul International Airport Lindbergh Terminal, Mezzanine Level (Directly above the Chili's Too restaurant) Note: Attendees should use the Short -Term or General Parking facilities and bring tickets in for validation. IT • A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments Volume 13, Number 6 Oakland Int'Z ALAMEDA, TW O CITIZENS GROUPS CHALLENGE FAA APPROVAL OF EXPANSION Fearing increased noise impact from the planned expansion of cargo facilities and passenger operations at Oakland International Airport, the City of Alameda, CA, joined by two citizens groups filed a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in early February challenging the Federal Aviation Administration's Record of Decision approving the airport's development plan. On Feb. 13, Alameda and the citizens groups — Citizens for Airport Safety and Serenity (CLASS) and Berkeley Keep the Jets over the Bay Committee — amended their petition to include the Port of Oakland and the Board of Port Commissioners, along with the FAA. This was the second lawsuit the city and citizens groups filed challenged the environmental studies supporting the airport's development program. In 1997, they challenged the Port of Oakland and Port Commissioners' approval of the Airport Development Program for Oakland International and also challenged the adequacy of the state Environmental Impact Report (EIR). A California Superior Court judge ruled in December 1998 that the state FIR for the airport development program was inadequate and ordered that additional (Continued on p. 23) Atlanta HartsfieZd Int'Z FULTON COUNTY SEEKS CONCESSIONS FOR IMPACT OF FIFTH RUNWAY EXTENSION Fearing its environmental impacts, Fulton County, GA, officials are vowing to tight the fifth runway at Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport unless conces- sions are made to the community. As leverage in its negotiations, the county just released a $230,000, 18-month study it funded, which was conducted by Clough Harbor and Associates, a Roswell, GA environmental planning and engineering firm. The study concluded that a 9,000-foot fifth runway would increase noise levels causing property values to drop and discouraging new business and residential development. It also concluded that the air and noise pollution from the new runway would disproportionately impact the predominantly minority south county, raising environmental justice issues that must be addressed in the federal approval process for the runway. The report provides the data to support a class action lawsuit seeking damages for past environmental impacts from the airport or litigation over the issue of environmental justice. said James Fason, deputy director of the county's Environ- ment and Community Development Department. However, he said that no decision has been made to pursue litigation at this point. A county -sponsored Hartsfield Advisory Committee is in the process of (Continued on p. 24) February 16,2001 In This Issue... Oakland ...The City of Alameda and two citizens groups challenge the FAA's Record of Decision on the development plan for Oakland International Airport - p. 21 Atlanta ...Fulton County officials vow to try to block the fifth runway at Hartsfield unless concessions are made to community - p. 21 Homestead I. Miami -Dade County commissioners are considering whether to join developer's lawsuit challenging rejection of commercial airport at former military base - p. 22 Burbank I. Airport authority amends its grandfathered noise rules to triple the amount of fines levied on Stage 2 jets operating at night. Beginning March 1, the fine will be $3,000 per violation - p. 22 Best Practices ... A report describing best environmental practices being used by airports in Europe and North America is released by the regional govern- ment in Sweden - p. 22 Noise Monitoring ... BridgeNetInternational an- nounces the first installation of a remotely operated airport noise monitoring system at Malpensa Airport in Milan - P. 23 February 16. 2001 Homestead COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEFER VOTE ON LAWSUIT At a Feb. 13 meeting, the Miami -Dade County Commis- sioners deferred consideration of whether to follow ivliami- Dade Mayor Alex Penelas' advise to join a lawsuit filed by developers challenging the federal government's rejection of a commercial airport at the former Homestead Air Force Base. Last month, the Homestead Air Base Developers Inc. (HABDI) challenged the Air Force's decision in January to reject conversion of the air base into a commercial airport because of the impact it would have on the Everglades National Park and Biscayne National Park. They contend that the Air Force was under political pressure from the outgoing Clinton Administration and acted illegally to reverse its 1994 approval of the base conversion project. In the waning days of his administration, President Clinton signed a law with strong bipartisan support to spend $8 billion to restore water flow to the Everglades. Environmentalists had strongly opposed the conversion of Homestead to a commercial airport on the grounds that noise and air pollution and the runoff of jet fuel would have devastating effects on the Everglades. Instead of approving a commercial airport at the Home- stead base, the Air Force will convey 700 acres of the 1,800-acre base to Miami -Dade County for mixed -use development. It is expected that an aquarium will be built on it as well as recreational facilities, hotels, offices, and other commercial development. Mayor Penelas argued in a memorandum to the commis- sioners that a commercial airport at Homestead could handle 600 flights daily within 20 years, taking pressure off of Miami International Airport. He contended that more airport capacity is critical to the county's future. Burbank NOISE RULES AMENDED "I A I rLr NIGHTTIME FINES The Burbank -Glendale -Pasadena Airport Authority voted unanimously Feb. 14 to amend its noise rules originally passed in 1981 to triple the amount of fines levied on operators of Stage 2jets arriving or departing Burbank Airport between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Beginning March 1, the Airport Authority's Rule 9 will impose a fine of $3,000 for each violation of the nighttime ban on Stage 2 jets, up from the $1,000 amount set when the rule was adopted 20 years ago, the airport announced. "Over the years, inflation has softened the impact of this restriction but tripling the amount will definitely send a message that we are serious about enforcing this key rule," said Airport Authority President Carl Nleseck_ "the Airport Authority also amended Rule 8, which predominantly prohibits nighttime general aviation training operations, engine run -ups, and takeoffs from midpoints of the runway instead of the takeoff end of the runway. The amended rule fines violators S I.000 for the first offense and $1,500 for subsequent offenses. The previous penalties were $500 and $1,000 respectively. The rule change also put in place a formal enforcement process that provides any alleged violator with an avenue of appeal if he wishes to contest the fine. There have been 36 nighttime violations at the airport in the past two years. The airport said that the Federal Aviation Administration has determined that noise rule financial penalties in place prior to enactment of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 may be updated at the discretion of the airport proprietor to reflect the impact of inflation. In separate action, the Airport Authority unanimously passed a resolution adding its support for the establishment of a new Stage 4 aircraft noise certification standard that is 14 dB cumulatively below the current Stage 3 standard, rather than the cumulative 10 dB drop recommended by the International Civil Aviation Organization's Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection. The Airports Council International — North America also is ling for -14 dB reduction. Some Stage 3 planes are already 10 decibels quieter than the minimum requirement, and technology will continue to improve," 7vleseck said, adding, "It will take 20 years or more to shift to a newer generation of aircraft, and we feel the new standards should reach as high as possible." Publications BEST PRACTICES MANUAL ON ENVIRONMENT PUBLISHED A repot[ describing the best environmental practices being used by airports in Europe and North America has been prepared by the regional government in Sweden with the assistance of a visiting official of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency. "Best Environmental Practices at Airports in Europe and North America — A Study of Good Examples," was prepared to help airports, communities, govemments, and non- governmental organizations ensure that the airports in their jurisdictions are instituting the eery best environmental practices. "Many airports are striving to respond to the concerns of these stakeholders by improving their environmental performance. Best practices can serve as a yardstick against which progress can be measured," the introduction to the 91-page report notes. It stresses, however, that it is does not capture every best practice at all airports in the North America and Europe. The report considers best practices in the areas of aircraft to high-speed rail. subsidies, public participation, noise abatement, air pollution, deicing. vehicle use, and global Airport Noisy Report 16, 2001 24 ANR EDITORIAL I Atlanta, from p.21 ADVISORY BOARD talking to law firms about litigation, he said, but no decision has been Steven R. Alverson made yet. Manager. Sacramento Office Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Fason said that all the alternatives considered for a fifth runway would disproportionately impact minority and low-income communities near John J. Corbett, Esq, the airport. Atlanta will not consider building a new runway on a 10,000 Spiegel & McDiarmid acre parcel of land it owns that would direct traffic away from these Washington. DC communities, Fason said. James D. Erickson If the fifth runway is extended, some portions of Fulton County would Director, Office of Environment and Energy be in the high noise contours, including 75-80 dB DNL contours, he said. Federal Aviation Administration Over 700 south county residents, many of them members of a local John C. Freytag, P.E. church, attending a Jan. 30 public hearing on an environmental impact Director, Charles M. Salter Associates study for the proposed fifth runway, which is expected to be completed San Francisco this summer. They expressed opposition to the project because they anticipated the Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq. four-year construction process will cause traffic congestion and that the Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance y Carlsbad, CA new runway will bring air and noise pollution. Hartsfield General Manager Ben DeCosta attended the hearing and Peter J. Kirsch, Esq. issued a statement noting that the airport is committed "to being fair" in Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld mitigating the effects of the runway for the communities surrounding the Denver ` airport, the Atlanta Journal reported. Suzanne C. McLean Atlanta already has federal approval to construct a 6,000-foot com- Chief Development Officer muter runway but wants to extend the length to 91000 feet and make the Tucson Airport Authority runway full service in order to reduce congestion and delay at Hartsfield, John M. Meennn the world's busiest airport. Airport officials contend that the new runway Senior vice President for industry Policy also will reduce air pollution because it will reduce aircraft delay on the Air Transport Association ground and in the air. The new runway is expected to cost $869 million and to open by 2005, Vincent E. Nlestre, P.E. if it receives federal approval. The EIS is expected to be submitted to the President, Nlestre Greve Associates Newport Beach, CA Federal Aviation Administration this summer. Harry King, chairman of the Hartsfield Advisory Committee, told the Steven F. Pflaum, Esq. Atlanta Journal that the airport spent years negotiating with Clayton McDermott, will & Emery County and College Park to acquire the land needed to extend the Chicago - runway to 9,000 feet but overlooked Fulton County because none of the Karen L. Robertson runway construction would take place there. Manager, Noise Compaci6ility Office "bVejust want to sit down at a table and discuss what the impact will be Dallas/Fort worth Intemational Airport for residents and how they can help us deal with those impacts," King Mary L. Vigilante told the Journal. "Wc want to form an alliance with this project; we don't President, Synergy Consultants want [o be seen as a 'stop the runway' group." Seattle _ Atlanta Department of Aviation officials did not respond to requests for comment on the Fulton county report in time for deadline. Lisa Lyle Waters Manager. Noise Abatement Program Palm Beach County Department or Airports AIRPORT NOISE REPORT Anne H. Kohut, Publisher Published d6 times a year at 43975 Urbanerest Ct_, Ashburn, Va.20147; Phone: (703) 729-�L367; 1'aA: (703) 729-4525. e-mail: editorrairportnoisereport.com; Price 5624. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of USSI.03 per patio per copy is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, NIA 01923. USA. Airport Noise Report A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological deyelopm ents Volume 13, Number 7 Naples BAN ON STAGE 2 AIRCRAFT VIOLATES FEDERAL GRANT AGREEMENTS, FAA SAYS Ratcheting up the pressure on Naples Airport Authority to rescind its first ever ban on the operation of Stage 2 jets under 75,000 lb., the Federal Aviation Administration has concluded informally that the recently -imposed ban on corporatejets is an "unreasonable restriction on the use of the airport and is not permitted under the assurances in the Authority's grant agreements." The restriction, which took effect on Ian. I, was immediately challenged by the National Business Aviation Association on the grounds that it is unreasonable, arbitrary, and discriminatory and would burden interstate commerce. Naples Airport Authority commissioners unanimously passed a resolution on Feb. 7 deferring enforcement of the restriction following a warning by the FAA that the airport could lose federal funding if the agency moves forward on its informal conclusions that the ban violates grant agreements and does not appear to comply with the agency's Part 161 costfbenefit study process. In accepting federal grant funds under the Airport Improvement Program, airports must commit to providing access to their facilities on fair and reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory terms, Paul L. Galis, FAA's deputy associate administrator for airports, explained in a Feb. 16 letter to Eric west, chairman of the City of Naples Airport Authority. The airport authority has the burden of demonstrating that its restriction meets those grant assurances, he noted in the letter. He said that, in view of the airport authority's recent suspension of enforcement of its ban on Stage 2 jets under 75,000 lb., and the airports long-standing cooperation in providing information to the FAA, the agency "is providing its views in an opinion letter rather than through the grant enforcement procedures." Grant Agreements Violated t,V"hy does the FAA assert that Naples has violated federal grant agreements'? The agency offered several reasons, beginning with the basis cited by the airport authority for its restriction: to minimize residential land within the 60 dB DNL contour, consistent with City of Naples and Collier County, FL. land use policies. Naples airport has no non -compatible residential use in its 65 dB DNL contour, the federal threshold for compatible residential use. The FAA supports planning and other actions taken by local governments to establish noise buffer areas beyond the 65 dB DNL comour. Galis said in his letter. "However, no restriction on access to a federally obligated airport has ever been based on residential impacts below the significant exposure level of DNL 65 dB. Given the FAA's strong interest in maintaining unrestricted access to public use airports in support of a national aviation system, any such restriction would need to be narrow in scope and not overbroad or unjustly discriminatory in its effect, and be directly related to the noise exposure problem identified. Also, the restriction could not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce." 1 Continued on p. 20) February 23,2001 In This Isszle... Naples .., FAA concludes informally that the airport's an on Stage 2 aircraft under 75,000 lb. violates federal grant agreements - p. 25 Cincinnati ... Airport seeking grant to install satellite navigation system to keep aircraft on flight tracks - p. 27 Teterboro . Boeing asks FAA to determine whether aircraft weight limit violates grant agreements - p. 27 Philadelphia I. Airport, township sign agreement on de- icing, noise mitigation - p. 28 News Briefs .. Bush Admin- istration restores cuts in fiscal 2002 budget for aviation pro- grams ... Final EIS on proposed FedEx cargo hub at Greensboro due in spring... FAA approves noise maps for Colorado Springs Airport... FAA an- nounces comment period on draft supplemental EIS for Cal Black Memorial Airport ... St. Lucie County commissioners insist community be represented on master plan update advisory committee ... Phoenix con- cerned that stadium will be in flight path ... St. Paul forms airport relations council to address airport noise, pollution, expansion issues - p. 28 2001 Naples. "Such a rule would be particularly irrational here since the authority lacks zoning or other police power over land use outside the airport proper. ANCA and Part 161 do not require exhaustion of non-restrictive alternatives before imposing Stage 2 restrictions." Naples said the it is FAA's position that "an airport operator's authority to impose a use restriction must be based upon factual evidence of noise liability exposure." "Neither the courts nor the FAA has ever required specific evidence of liability to justify a noise or access restriction," Naples contended. "While concern about liability is an acceptable reason for imposing a noise rule, it has never been a required element under previous federal law, ANCA, or Part I61." Naples said that it is FAA's position that its Stage 2 ban is overbroad because noise complaint data show patterns in the time and location of complaints. "The FAA has never suggested that complaint data should be used as a basis for measuring noise impacts, Naples said. Complaint data provide useful information but "should not be the basis for delimiting the scope of a noise rule." Cincinnati Int'1 AIRPORT SEEKING GRANT TO INSTALL LAAS SYSTEM The Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Intemational Airport has applied for a Federal Aviation Administration grant to fund the installation of satellite navigation technology that will have the dual benefit of increasing airport capacity and mitigating noise by keeping aircraft within agreed upon fli_ghtcorridors. The aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21a Century (AIR 21) established a pilot program under which the FAA will pay 33 percent, up to a maximum of $15 million, to fund 10 airport projects nationwide that are aimed at improving airport capacity and enhancing airspace procedures. Cincinnati[Northern Kentucky International is one of 17 airports that have applied for such funds. It is expected that the FAA will indicate which airports have been selected for the grants some time this summer. The advanced technology sought by the airport is the Local Areas Augmentation System or LAAS. Airplanes equipped with the technology can fly very precise paths, enabling them to stay within noise abatement corridors. Even if the airport does not receive the FAA grant, it intends to install the LAAS system, Barb Schempf, the airport's noise abatement manager, told ANR. The satellite technology was identified as a noise mitigation measure in the airport's Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program, she explained. In related news, the draft environmental impact statement for the addition of a new runway at CincinnatiliNorthern Kentucky International and the extension of an existing runway is expected to be released for public comment next week. Teterboro BOEING SAYS WEIGHT BAN VIOLATES GRANT AGREEMENTS Boeing Corp. has asked the Federal Aviation Administra- tion to determine whether the 100,000 lb. weight limit on aircraft operating at Teterboro Airport — which keeps Boeing Business Jets from operating there — violates federal grant agreements. If the FAA determines that it does, it could force the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, proprietor of the airport, to grant Boeing a waiver of the weight limit which has been in place since 1967 and is strongly supported by the community. The Port Authority, which recently took back operational control of Teterboro, plans to keep the weight limit in place. It is the best way to balance the needs of general aviation with those of the airport neighbors, a Port Author - spokesman told ANR. Local and state politicians, led by NJ Rep. Steve Rothman (D) are adamant that the weight limit remain in effect. In late January, they urged local residents to write the Bush Administration and the FAA to voice their opposition to allowing the Boeing Business Jet, a variation of the B7377 into Teterboro. Boeing contends that its business jet, which can weigh up to 170,000lb., can land safety at the airport and will not be noisier than airplanes currently operating there. Boeing Analysis Steve Barlage, regional sales director for Boeing Business Jets, said he expects FAA's Eastern Region office to make a determination on the airplane weight that Teterboro runways can safely handle within the next few months. Boeing conducted an engineering analysis of the runways, based on data obtained from the Port Authority and using FAA standards, which concluded that its business jet could safely operate there, Barlage said. The Port Authority's conclusion that the runways are limited to aircraft under ]007000lb. was based on a "non -conventional engineering treatment" and not FAA's standards, he told ANR. Barlage said that Boeing has stepped into the issue at the request of customers who have purchased its business jet, which has had much stronger sales than anticipated. The company has sold 71 aircraft in the last three and one- half years, far exceeding the eight or nine sales per year it had projected in 1996 when it joined with General Electric Co. to produce the new aircraft in response to market demand for a larger, more capable business airplane that can tly more than 6,000 nautical miles. Airport Noise Report February 23,2001 29 A N R EDITORIAL consider whether a new runway is needed. The commissioners also approved a $21,620 contract with MEA Group, ADVISORY BOARD Inc. of West Palm Beach to conduct a study to determine whether the Steven R. Alverson airport's Part 150 airport noise compatibility plan needs updated. Manager, Sacramento Office Traffic at the airport has increased markedly since 1999, said Airport Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Manager Paul Phillips, and the number of business jets using the facility John J. Corbett, Esq. also is increasing. The airport also is home to several flight training Spiegel & McDiarmid schools. ` Washington. DC Aviation Funding Restored James Erickson Despite its initial proposal to cut aviation program funding levels set in Director, Office of Environment and Energy Federal Aviation Administration last year's Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), the Bush Administration has agreed to restore $568 million in John C. Freytag, P.E. aviation funding in its fiscal 2002 budget plan, the Washington Post Director, Charles M. Salter Associates reported Feb. 16. ` San Francisco More than half the money that will be restored, $368 million, is Michael Scott G atzke, Esq. earmarked for airport capital improvement projects, and the remaining Gauke, Dillon & Ballance $200 million is earmarked for the FAA's general operating budget, the Carlsbad, CA paper reported. Peter J. Kirsch, Esq. The Bush Administration has come under heavy lobbying from aviation Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld trade groups and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to fully fund aviation Denver programs. Suzanne C. hlcLea❑ Phoenix Concerned about Sports Stadium Chief Development Officer Tucson Airport Authority The City of Phoenix, proprietor of Sky Harbor International Airport, has expressed concern that the site for the new Cardinals baseball stadium John .VI. bleenan selected by the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority is located less than Senior Vice President for Industry Policy Air Transport Association two miles from the airport and may hamper plans to add a fourth runway at Sky Harbor because the stadium will be in the airport's flight path. Vincent E. blestre, P.E. Phoenix Councilwoman Peggy Bilsten has asked officials of the President, blestre Greve Associates tourism and sports authority, the Cardinals, and a riverfront development Newport Beach, CA project in Tempe to pledge not to oppose the airport's expansion. Steven F. Pflaum, Esq. Tempe's redevelopment director said the city, which has been battling McDermott, Will & Emery Phoenix for years over aircraft noise, would never sign a blank check on Chicano airport growth. Karen L. Robertson St. Paul Forms Noise Commission Manager, Noise Compatibility Office Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport The City of St. Paul, MN, recently formed a new 23-member city Mary L. Vigilante commission, called the St. Paul Airport Relations Council (SPARC), to President, Synergy Consultants work with citizens groups on issues related to noise, pollution, and Seattle expansion of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Formation of the commission was applauded by R.T. Rybak, a well Lisa Lyle Waters known anti -noise activist who currently is ruining for mayor of Nlinne- Manager. Noise Abatement Program y Palm Beach County Department of Airports apolis. AIRPORT NOISE REPORT Anne H. Kohut, Publisher ftiblished 46 times a year at 43975 Urbanerest Ct., Ashburn, Va.20147; Phone: (703) 729-4367; FA\: (i0 �) 729-4�23_ e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price 5624. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of USS 1.03 per page per copy is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers. NIA 01923. USA. Airport Noise Report