The URL can be used to link to this page

2011-06-28 Planning Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA June 28, 2011- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Approval of the May 24, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes 5. Hearings a. Case No 11-11 (continued from May 24, 2011 meeting): Paul Elias, 2242 Lexington Avenue So, conditional use permit and variance request for a detached garage. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. b_ Case No. 11-13: New Cingular Wireless, 1196 Northland Drive, Mendota Heights, conditional use permit for wireless facility. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. c. Case No. 11-14: White Pine Holdings, 750 Highway 110, amendment to conditional use permit for planned unit development. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. d. Case No. 11-15: David Bergh, 996 Caren Court, critical area permit for a single story addition. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. e. Case No. 11-16: Michael Waldman, 580 Watersedge Terrace, wetlands permit for a fence. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. f. Case No. 11-17: Michael Cornick, 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway, critical area permit to replace a single family home. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. g. Case No. 11-18: John and Rebecca Driscoll, 21 Dorset Road, conditional use permit for a covered front entry. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. h. Case No. 11-19: Beverly Sargent, 1040 Sibley Memorial Highway, critical area permit for a patio. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. i. Case No. 11-21: Dave Albrecht, 1345 Mendota Heights Road, variances to required setbacks for monument signs. Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. 6. Verbal Review 7. Adj ourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 651-452-1850 with requests. Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 24, 2011 etin of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, May 24, 2011, The regular me g 1101 Victoria in the Council Chambers at City Hall, a Curve at 7:00 P. Field Hennes, Magnusson, The following Commissioners were present: Chair Norton, Commissioners n and Viksnos. Those absent: None. Those present Nazzi ellor and NAC Planner Carie Noonan Rosto , Administrator Jake Sedlacek, Public Works Director/City ng Fuhrman. Minutes were recorded by Carla Wirth. Approval ofAgenda The agenda was approved as submitted. Approval o A ril 26 2011 Minutes TED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER D ROSTON, TO COMMISSIONER FIELD MO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 2011 AS PRESE AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Report on New Statute A ectin Variances dum regarding the recently adopted statute Planner Carie Fuhrman presented Planner Grittman's memoran b ittinan advised enacting a new standard for the city's ability to consider and issue ds that reflect Planner ecityrs definition of the city to use variances sparingly and adopt ordinance s an Wanner of use. It was noted the League of Minnesota Cities will be considering how this new reasonable i legislation will' mpact municipalities. were using variances more often than they s Toner Field stated the advice is to use variances a paringly, which is fairly broad. Ms. Fu nnan Commi stated prior to the Krummenacher case other communities have, which resulted in the Kr often, ruling. dC used should had the new standard Heights did consider a variance, which was not ted when Mendota often, rt already y tive. Ms. Fuhrman stated it was effective Commissioner Magnuson asked when the legislation was effec immediately upon signing. Viksnins noted the variance consideration has to be rarectr Commesult of is oner N ksn nature applicant's making. Ms. Fuhrmnique and would continue to ns of Commissioner parcel, not of the appan stated that is when variances were considered, the commission looked for something u make that same consideration. prohibits this nan referenced the second bulleted point indicatingalowed ordinance Commissioner N noordinance. Ms mnner of use" and asked if a variance would allow something 1 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 eet,Fuhrman explained the ordinance would prohibit a building setback at 20 feet instead of the re feet, and a variance application would request something not allowed by the ordinance. required 50 Commissioner Hennes noted there will be an interesting discussion relating to Case No. 11 - conditional use permit and variance, during which the commission will need guidance. 11 for a Commissioner Roston stated he found several problems with the statute because it n circumstances for granting a variance relating to economic considerations, which have n eliminated. He noted the statute was intended to create a process whereby a variance couldarrows the used language from case law on exactions of regular takings, which he believes will now been Commissioner Roston stated he believed the intention was to make it discretionary be granted but variances where it otherwise could not so he does not understand the re be a "disaster. t ionary for the city to grant Legislature. write of the statute by the Hearings PLANNING CASE #11-10 Beverly Sargent 1040 Sibley Memorial Highway Critical Area Permit for a privacy fence Planner Carie Fuhrman presented the request of Beverly Sargent for a critical area permit to a installation of a fence along the side yard of her property at 1040 Highway 13. The 128 -fon e is proposed along the northeast roe allow the property riy line that lies perpendicular to Highway 13 and would het into fentwo existing chain link fence segments, resulting in a complete fence along the entire length of the n property line. The subject site is zoned R-1, one family residential, and located within the Mississippi River corridor. Since work would be conducted within this corridor, a critical a northeast area permit is required. PPl Ms. Fuhrman presented staff's analysis of the request and advised it has come to staff's attention construction of the fence has started as well as a gravel driveway that was not part of this application. Therefore, discussion may occur on code enforcement. Based on the application the that consider approval of the critical area e pp permit to install the fion can ence subject to conditions orcconsider denial ss based on findings of negative impacts to the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area. In addition, the commissi the gravel driveway or require removal. on could require the. applicant obtain a permit for Commissioner Roston asked if there are past examples of a structure being constructed application approval. Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek stated there have been after -the -fact permits but this is the first case he is aware of where the roe Prior to and proceeded with construction prior to approval. several p p rty owner made application Beverly Sargent, 1040 Highway 13, applicant, stated the gravel driveway existed when she Purchased property but she had added gravel so her father, who has Parkinsons, could access the back do have to use the steps. With regard to the fence, Ms. Sargent stated she knew she nee P haled the for the fence but did not realize it involved a 6-8 week process to obtain a critical area or and not already scheduled the fence installation but read the code requirements needed a building permit permit She had designed. to assure the fence was correctly Commissioner Magnuson asked how much gravel was added. Ms. Sargent estimated 2-3ards was laid over the existing gravel surface without expanding its width or length. Y 2 01 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 in Commissione r Viksnins asked if the fence is fully installed. Ms. Sargent ed the fence contractortdative °d stated it was completed five weeks ago. She explained she ' to approval. ernMs- Sargent stated it Commissioner Viksnins stated the application is straightforward buttheconcern is that while the March. Com process, had proceed p resident understood there was a pennitting f the process for a critical area permit• was a timing issue because she didn't know the length od not. Sargentermit. Ms. stated she had it was required Commissioner Noonan asked if �eha been ived a inconnce sistent in that she knew a pe ted the location Commissioner Noonan stated her testimony yet the contractor proceeded to construct the thfence without snot followed.Ms. Noonan argent stated had already of the fence is not problematic; however,at ti e process impression that she could get the fence peg mmissit the day ioner�Noonlan st ted the codefor it and by lis fo'in protecte resident tated signed an agreement with the contractorremove id for she has already p as well as the city, noting the applicant could nnow obes generosity in considering uired toCe s Sargentgt proceed she is aware of that and is hoping for the Com the fence. Commissioner Noonan stated the contractor should have indicated he could no p without the permit. Commissioner Hennes asked if the contractor had been involved with the pen -nit application or left it to Sargent stated she does not know but estimated 15 property owner. Ms. Sargent stated she made application, not the contractor. Commissioner Hennes thep p asked how long the old chain link fence existed. s• g years and clarified that it is her neighbor's fence for their dogs. Ms. Sargent stated she wantedto complete the fence for privacy. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Norton asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES t NAYS 0 short of nks there be rarm Commissioner Roston stated he understands the confusion but thionest mistake.l He asked if the city can tearing down a fence that meets Code and there has been an ineer Mazzitello stated the city uildin constructed without a building permit but he is not aware of that charge a double permit fee as abpenalty. Public Works Director/City Eng has charged a double fee for a g occurring with a fence. Commissioner Roston asked staff to work with the city aafence. He also suggested the application orney to draft a remedy when a fence is Comma constructed prior to permit approval short of tearing own ired prior to construction. Mr. Mazzitel o form be revised to include notation that permit approval is requ estimated the fence permit cost is $50. processwho is not aware of itting Commissioner Magnuson stated she has sympathy forme fence today and yone believed lit was nreaso able so Co Magnuson stated she and ordinance requirements. She stated she viewed Commissioner under typical circumstances she would have voted for approval- lin to consider a double fence pen -nit fee for construction prior to permit approval but hoped would be willing Planning COMMission Minutes May 24, 2011 the commission would be reasonable in its deliberation and take into consideration that not everyone has read the ordinances and knows the number of requirements that need to be met. COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE BY COMMISSIONER HENNES CRITICAL AREA PERMIT AS REQTO NG CONDITIONS: REQUESTED AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWI 1• THE APPLICANT CONFIRM THAT THE FENCE PROJECT SAA LANDSCAPING, PAVING SHALL NOT INVOLVE ALTERATION, GRADE CHANGES, SOIL LOSS, OR SLOPE 2• 3 THE APPLICANT SHALL RECEIVE A FENCE PERMIT, 6THE FENCE SHALL MEET THE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 12-1D- , - - 6, INCLUDING THE 30% OPEN DESIGN RE 2 1D 4. APPLICANT SHALL PAY A FENCE PERMIT FEE TWICE THE NORMAL RATE IN LIGHT OF THE APPLICANT'S FAILURE TO PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO APPLICATIONS. COMPLY WITH STANDARD Commissioner Roston asked if condition #4 can be required given the current ordinance language. Sedlacek stated it is likely the commission cannot but perhaps that will be art o action. �- p f the code enforcement Commissioner Viksnins asked how an additional fee can be obtained in this case. Mr. Sedlacek ex there is a dual tract with the permit process and code enforcement process since the fence was con explained without a permit. If the code allows a double permit through code -enforcement, it will alreadyapply. Commissioner Field stated he would not support the motion with condition #4 included. pp y Commissioner Hennes asked if the council has the abili evening. m ty to impose a double fee. Mr. Sedlacek sated he is unsure but that issue will be reflected in the memoranduto the council regarding the discussion this COMMISSIONERS VHKSNINS AND HENNES ACCEPTED THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT OFFERED BY COMMISSIONER SSIONER ROSTON TO REVISE CONDITION 4 AS FOLLOWS: 4. RECOMMEND CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT, TO THE EXTENT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH CODE, TO ATTACH A DOUBLE PERMIT FEE IF ALLOWED By THE ORDINANCE. Chair Norton stated he does not favor a condition as part of the motion to charge a doubleermit leery of the commission overstepping its bounds to penalize citizens due to a mistake. He p and is Purpose of the planning commission is to review applications before it and if there is already noted ding e p enforcement he would recommend it be allowed to take place without interference. Commissioner Viksnins respectfully disagreed, noting the friendly amendment is a recommendation the council. He believed there should be consequences and the commission should be able to reco those consequences. to mmend Chair Norton stated he does not object to encouraging enforcement action taking place but does not support it as part of the motion. 11 Planning COMMISSlOn Minutes May 24, 2011 Commissioner Field stated his support of the Chair's position and indicated he would not vote u1 favor of the motion. Commissioner Viksnins called the question. AYES 4 NAYS 3 (Field, Magnuson, Norton) lly by the Commissioner Ficant ield noted there was also an issue with h the gravel d clarity m the minutes that thisissue that it existed when she purchased the property. He stated was being dispensed with. Chair No stated if the gravel driveway is a code enforcement issue, it will be addressed by the city. il would consider this application at its June 7, 2011, meeting. Chair Norton advised the city counc PLANNING CASE #11-11 Paul Elias 2242 Lexington Avenue South Conditional Use Permit and Variance request for a detached garage ditional use -nit (CUP) to allow Planner Carie Fuhrman presented the request of Paul f his propeor a rty at 2242 Lexington Avenue South the construction of a detached garage in the rear yard of his p py replace a dilapidated single -stall detached garage. The applicant pppresented the four alternatives sishes to construct a ubmitted fled by the P between 832 and 1,344 square feet in size. Ms. Fuhrman applicant for garage sizes of: 24 -foot by 36 -foot (3 -stall with loft), 26 -foot by 32 -foot (2 -stall), 24 -foot by o requesting a 36 -foot (3 -stall with loft), and 24 -foot by 36 -foot ( app edhe p olydetachedcant is saccessory buildings. to . exceed the maximum 750 square foot area requirementpp ted the rear and side and setbacks Fuhrman presented staff's analysis of theCUP fives may requist. It re a separate height variance. In addition, would be met but garage height of some al the appl the alternatives propose different exterior building materials reco nmicant ended that uasssurances1be made hat the select a specific plan, drawn to scale. Ms. Fuhrma patible With he sprincipal building proposed accessory building is comordinanceallowsonly one private gar gen prop e the staff building in color, roof style and pitch. Becausnd driveway be removed and turf re-established as a recommended the existing detached structure a condition of the CUP. d staff's analysis of the vahe clarified that the upperequest to exceed r Me 11-laximum 750 square foot s. Fuhrman presentelevel s not part of the area area applied to detached accessory buildings. She if it is finished and heated for occupation, it is included in calculation if retained as cold storage; however, the building area calculation. Ms. Fuhnnan presented the city's typical standard for variance approval as detailed in the staff report and or to ce p" with referenced the new legislation recently signed into law Ibation meets n new tesptsa the var a cle can be "practical difficulties." She stated if the city finds the app -it's variance considered for approval. Ms. Fuhrman explained st bhshed that a detached accest in consideration of the sory building measuring ing the commission should consider that the city has, established 750 square feet in size is the maximum or reasonaent couldtbepon deemedd"unreasonable" within the Detached accessory structures exceeding this requiren context of a single-family residential neighborhood. She o ers zed" aced that cessory buuring ildings and believes his applicant indicated his neighborhood is characterized by Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 proposed building would be consistent in size with other area buildings. Ms. Fuhrman indicated that staff reviewed aerial photos of the area and found that is the case with many detached accessory buildings exceeding 750 square feet in size. In addition, many properties in this area have multiple detached accessory buildings. While the existence of large accessory structures in the area may provide a basis to determine the applicant's request is "reasonable," itis important to note that many of the overs buildings likely exist as nonconfize ormities. This raises the questions of whether or not existing conditions should be the basis for further proliferation of oversized accessory structures. Ms. Fuhrman stated the commission may consider approval of the CUP with conditions or denial of the CUP based , a fording the proposed garage would adversely affect surrounding properties. In regard to the variance, the commission may consider approval based on appropriate findings or denial based on findings. She indicated staff is supportive of the CUP with conditions but does not support the requested variance to exceed 750 square feet. Commissioner Field noted a height variance of 15 feet is also required and asked for staff's input. Ms. Fuhrman explained the applicant has not applied for a height variance and if the applicant chooses to pursue a structure that exceeds the height requirement, that application would have to be made. Commissioner Noonan stated one recommended CUP condition requires an attempt to match the architecture and style of the principal building. However, when he visited the site he found the submitted architectural renderings do not match the principal structure and may be out of character. Ms. Fuhrman explained staff is recommending that requirement be placed, if approved. Chair Norton explained it could be required by a CUP condition placed on the application rather than the applicant coming forward with the submittal. Commissioner Hennes stated the issue with the variance boils down to the difference in the size of structure the applicant wants and the allowed 750 square feet. He asked if a three -stall garage can be constructed of 750 square feet. If not, he felt property owners were being penalized if the building has to be constructed as detached. Ms. Fuhrman stated she does not know if a three -stall garage can be constructed under 750 square feet. Mr. Sedlacek stated the council determined the code restriction to limit the size of detached garages and encourages garages to be attached if large in size. Commissioner Roston noted one alternative is 32 -foot by 24 -foot which is 768 square feet and identifies a three -car garage with a loft. He stated he has concern with the practical difficulties component. Paul Elias, 2242 Lexington Avenue S., explained he is trying to improve hisro e garage would make it compatible and compliment the principle structure. The principle ple strso the c ture fthe was built in 1940 and an addition constructed 1950. At this time he would like to construct a garage. Mr. Elias stated he reviewed many garage plans and found several he thought would fit with the roof pitch of the principle building. In addition, dormers would be added to compliment the structure. He agreed the barn -styled garages do not fit as well and stated his preference for alternate 1. storage for vehicles, motorcycles and other things. He noted this is a narrow Mr. Elias stated he needs and long lot so it is not feasible to construct an attached garage. Commissioner Field asked how wide the lot is. Mr. Elias estimated 70 feet in width and 470 feet deep. Commissioner Field concurred it would be impossible to construct an attached garage on this lot rel M Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 configuration. Mr. Elias stated he has wanted to construct a garage for many years and talked with builders about the alternate designs, roof heights, and to add donners. t's plight due to the narrow ot Commissioner Field stated he is sympathimapp, ould be helpful to know thel ot an issue for h exact a size o hetic about the while the appearance of the garage is n the garage. Commissioner Magnuson asked if alternate 1 is the applacsecond story preference. loft and asked how it the dbe affinnative. Commissioner Magnuson noted rt contains ow but would like the option because he needs storage area. used. Mr. Elias stated he does not yet kn be d in the Commissioner Magnuson noted if that loft space is fin�hed� or fir. Elias stated ted hi n it dintent is heat it ll square footage calculation, effectively reducing the garage be used as cold storage but someone in the future may want an office or room. He stated the footprint of the garage would be 24 -feet by 36 -feet. it Commissioner Magnuson stated that is 864 square feet in size and if he loft Hers is finished e it forwould storage intent to finish o r heat 400 square ms int. stead r. Elias of storage on rafters, ted it is not and to have a staircase. of boxed rt Commissioner Magnuson asked if a three -stall garageis needed.Mr. isEnlas stated he storage. In add taonrefer a four he has fve stall garage because there are four cars on the site an motorcycles, a snowmobile and three boats. isited he property hor on Commissioner Magnuson stated she vi r s tenfeet from the property linf he has talked with the e and the thatou e Wagon Wheel. Commissioner Magnuson statedline. hi addition the existing garage would be proposed garage would be 30 feet from the property with that neighbor and a fence could be erected or trees planted. removed. He stated he has spoken w Commissioner Viksnins asked how large the existing garage is. Mr. Elias stated may be be feet wide by 20 -feet deep and if empty it may hold a subcompact car. However, the garage structure is beyond repair. estimated it is 28 -feet by 40- Commissioner Viksnins asked how large the neighbor's garage Lexin on Avenue South feet and noted there is another three -car detached garage insulated garage door so he could install a heater and be Mr. Elias clarified that the garage would have an able to work indoors. Chair Norton asked staff to display the applicant's lot diagram and and asks boneigas Eous lias to identify the location of his house, existing garage, location of the proposed bage ked what is Chair Norton addressed the ability of the applicant to buaki w attached wg h windowsrage and sand dormers above. on the western edge of the house. Mr. Elias stated it is g s added in front of lta e garage, would it eliminate all the windows in Chairman Norton asked if a garage ithe affirmative. the family/living room. Mr. Elias answered in ted it is Chair Norton asked what is located on the east e a araedgee s of tadded to the ackEliashe house. Mr. and eas ern sideewould it bathroom, and a kitchen. Chair Norton asked if g g eliminate the bedroom's egress window. Mr. Elias stated that is correct and also remove a window from 7 PlIn"i779 Commission Milurtes May 24, 2011 the bedroom and kitchen. In addition, that location is not feasible because of the grade and impact to drainage of the lot. Chair Norton asked how long he has lived at this property. Mr. Elias stated it has been 28 years. Commissioner Noonan referenced alternate 1 and asked Mr. Elias if it is his intention to purchase the plan or if the builder will tweak the plan depending on the situation. Mr. Elias stated he looked at Menard's garage plans that can be purchased but in his case adding dormers would change that plan. He noted that due to the 12/12 roof pitch, only one-half of the loft floor area would be usable. Commissioner Noonan agreed that adding dormers would improve the aesthetics. He stated the difficulty with the initial application was which alternate plan would be used and if it is alternate 1, the commissi n can focus on the items that need to be addressed such as square footage and height. Commissioner Noonan noted the greatest justification stated by Mr. Elias is to allow a garage to accommodate all the vehicles and other equipment on site. However, he is not overly sympathetic to that argument and asked if the applicant is trying to put too much on the site, though it is laudable to store them indoors. Commissioner Noonan stated that something may have to be done to miti site. gate having so many things on Commissioner Hennes stated he shares some of these concerns, especially with the height. He noted alternate 4 has a height of 14 feet 8 inches but the other three alternates are much higher, 22-23 feet. Ms. Fuhrman clarified the 15 -foot measurement is not taken to the highest peak but to the average midslo e. Mr. Elias stated all four alternatives are under the 15 -foot height requirement. p Commissioner Hennes asked if a size of 24 -feet by 32 -feet (768 square feet) is an acceptable option. He noted it could be constructed to appear as alternate 1, hold three cars, provide storage, and meet the height requirement. Mr. Elias stated that may be a possibility but that size may not accommodate a staircase or his needs for storage that would include lawn equipment. He stated alternate 1 is 24 -feet by 36 -feet and would allow space for a staircase, work bench, and to work on cars. Commissioner Roston asked if a three -stall garage can be built of 750 square feet. Mr. Elias stated alternate 2 (26 -feet by 32 -feet) is also over 750 square feet and he wants the garage, if built, to be useable. Commissioner Field stated he understands this process is frustrating for both sides and asked if it is Possible to present an application with one plan. He indicated that tonight he would have to vote against the application because he is unsure what is being asked. Chair Norton stated the commission could act on the CUP and variance applications tonight as presented with Mr. Elias indicating his preference for alternate 1, which may or not be approved. Or, the commission could table the application to next month's meeting which may avoid a situation where the application is denied. Then an application can be presented that is specific to the design and size and may not involve a variance request. y Commissioner Roston asked about the 60 -day rule. Mr. Sedlacek stated the application is within the initial 60 days and if tabled staff would issue a letter extending for an additional 60 days. Commissioner Hennes asked if the commission could consider the CUP tonight and table the variance. Staff indicated its preference that both applications be considered at the same time. Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 Noonan noted if the commission supports the CUP then the applicant can address the Commissioner Noon ort for the CUP. concerns expressed. He supported determining whether there is Supp cation because he does not think the applicant if he had questions. Mr. Chair Norton explained the CUP and variance process and asked the Elias stated he wished he had included just alternate 1 in this app li barn-style garages fit the area. Chair Norton stated he appreciates being provided with options; however, the commission is tasked with making a specific decision on a specific plan. He noted that even with alternate 1, a variance is require to d it because the size exceeds 750 square feet. Chair Norton state of requirepPra variaio enit commission Willing to consider the CUP application tonight and if the structure does return to the commission for additional consideration. Mr. Elias stated his preference to move forward with alternate 1 t because Commissioner Noonan onih Commissioner Field stated he does notfavoratinof thJ one garage and others are conce,e CUPtwhich can be addressed in the CUP rned about theappearance conditions. d he wants to improve this house with new saes tding ogodown but he still d windows when the waantts to make ge is under Mr. Elias state contmu g construction. He noted the value of e is property each other. improvements so the house and garage ing consideration Commissioner Field asked Mr. Elias if he would be comforta �1 bmittedlwi h one option, to he next meeting, which would be his preference so the application can n to next month but indicated he wants to get started Mr. Elias stated his willingness to table consideratio on construction as soon as he can. lication with one specific it subm' an Chair Norton stated that Mr. Elias s for working with he ccan then work with ommission ass on and answering its questions. building plan. He thanked Mr. Elia the su orted the missioner Field asked Chair Norton to poll the commissioners whether, in theory, Y pp Com application. issioners and Chair revealed all would support a CUP if not greater than 750 square A poll of the Comm feet. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ONSID 11, CUP AND VARIANNERAT ON OF CAS NO. 11- KEEP THE PUBLIC CE TO THE JUNE 28, 011 MEETING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Commissioner Hennes stated his opinion this application should not have been forwarded to the h four options and so many variables. He asked aaontof C nmrk o WO �issioneth Mr. EHennes blias to rat this commission wit p su orted the obs application. Commissioner Field strongly pc general application should not have come before the commission tonightdefined goals but heshares the tg rt is unfair to "lay this at the feet" of staff when the applicant as 9 Planning Commission Minutes May 24, 2011 observation that in the next 30 days he hopes the applicant will work with staff to proposal. develop a more specific Chair Norton advised this application would again be considered by the 1 28, 2011, meeting. If forwarded to the council at that time, it would be consider on Planning commission at its June Mr. Elias asked how soon he can get a buildingpermit, Pp Mr. Sedlacek explained that building July 5, 2011. permits may be submitted prior to final approval; however, they are not prioritized as h considered on a first-time/first-come basis. ighly and would be PLANNING CASE #11-12 Patrick Costello 2535 Pilot Knob Road Conditional Use Permit for participative athletics in the industrial zone Planner Carie Fuhrman presented the request of Patrick Costello for a conditional locate "Crossfit Mendota," a proposed athletic training business Knot Road. The zoning ordinance allows l participative athletics" b use permit (CUPi to presented staff's analysis of the application, Patin the h m a vacant industrial space along Pilot Y CUP in the industrial district. She to 7 a.m., evenings from 5 g ours of operation would be weekdays from 5 a.m. and Saturdays. p m to 7 p.m., and possibly morning hours of 9 a.m. to 1 Y Ms. Fuhrman stated the planning commission ma recommend approval on weekdays findings and subject to conditions or denial based on findings that the use would Office/industrial nature of the surrounding area and raise concerns related o d b pppatib based on Other issues. be incompatible with the Staff recommends approval, as presented, since the use should be locwerr pony values, or intense than other permitted uses in the district and the zoning ordinance anticipates the industrial district by listing them under the C and less UP allowance. P es these types of uses in Commissioner Hennes asked if the C UP unless hours are limited by the CUP conditilons Of approval imits hours of ° eration. p Ms. Fuhrman stated it would not Commissioner Viksnins asked if hours of operation are being recommended by staff. Ms. Fuhrman stated staff is not making a recommendation; the hours indicated were suggested by the a Patrick Costello, applicant pplicant. representing and is available to answer questions. Crossfit Mendota, stated he has nothing to add to staff's re ort p Commissioner Magnuson asked if this in facility includes music that would Properties, �-. Costello stated there will be music but assured the co impact neighboring excessively loud or cause a disturbance in the building. comm* it would not be Chair Norton stated that would be a code enforcement issue, if it occurred. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Norton asked for a mof hearing. ion to close the public COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED THE PUBLIC BY COMMISSIONER VI HEARING• KSNINS, TO CLOSE 10 Planning Conu.iission Minutes May 24, 2011 AYES I NAYS COMMISSIONER FIELD, TO COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOLD' SECONDED BY REQUESTED BASED RECOMMEND APP ROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS ON FINDINGS DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPO AYES NAYS 0 2011, meeting and Chair Norton advised the city council would consider this application at its June 7, recommended Mr. Costello be in attendance. Verbal Review Mr. Sedlacek gave the following verbal review: Conditional Use Permit PLANNING CASE 411-04 Mendakota Country the PLANK the City Council Club Planning Commission. as recommended by Critical Area Permit Approved by No and Sandra Krebsbach PLANNING CASE #11-08 the Planning Commission. Council as recommended by Wetlands Permit Approved by the City Karry Knoll Commission. PLANNING CASE 4 the Planning Approved by City Council as recommended by th ROSTON, TO •ER FIELD SECONDED BY COMvIISSIONER Comm, THE MEETING AT g� P -M" ADJOURN AYES 7 NAYS 0 Respectfully submitted, Carla Wirth, Recording Secretary 11 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrato` SUBJECT: Planning Case 2011-11, Paul Elias Discussion commission on May 24, 2011. At the May Case 2011-11 was presented to the planning Planning reference for the size and finish o meeting the applicant, Paul Elias, was unable to articulate pion tabled the matter to the June the detached garage he was requesting. The planning 28, 2011 meeting. quest — a copy of additional material Mr. Elias has provided additional detail on his req s submitted er from the May 24, 2011 meeting. t has been attached, as well as the planning memo on this matt The proposed garage is 864 square feet in area. Recommendation p hcation. has not changed with the submission of further detail on the a p Staff, s recommendation A j I 3�1 0 i N 0 v N awram v Line of Loft Above 36'-0" s nrdQr this elan. visit the Menaras 0 3 -Car Garage With -VWUMwd46eft ■ Size - 36'x 24' ■ Building height - 22'-8" ■ Roof pitch - 11/12 (main roof), 4/12 (rear slope) ■ Ceiling heights: First floor - 8'-10" Loft - 10' ■ Three 9' x 7' overhead doors ■ Complete list of materials ■ Step-by-step instructions IIII- ►'r1CiRT'H1hiE5T ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC' suite 202, Golden valley, MN 55422 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, tan ners@?nacplan„1„ "`�` Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.23 1.2561 P MEM®RA_NQU Mendota Heights Planning Commission TO: Carie Fuhrman / Stephen Grittman FROM: DATE: May 19, 2011 MEETING DATE: May 24, 2011 Conditional Use Permit for the construe a requi requif a rement SUBJECT: garage and Variance from maximum are CASE NO: Case No. 11-11, NAC Case: 254.04 -11.10 APPLICANT(S): Paul Elias 2242 Lexington Avenue South LOCATION. ZONING: R-1, Single Family GUIDE PLAN: Low Density Residential Back round and Description of Re uest: a conthe construction of a detached conditional use permit to allow The applicant is seeking located at 2242 Lexington Avenue South. garage garage in the rear yard of his property le stall detached g applicant wishes to replace a dilapidated, sing Specifically, the app application includes four alternative garage with a new, larger garage. The submitted app plans as summarized below: 864 square feet (24' x 36') Option 1 - Three stalls, square feet (26' x 32') Option 2 - Two stalls, 832 eliving area, 1,344 square feet (24' x 36' footprint) Option 3 - Two stalls w/ uppersquare feet (24' x 36') Option 4 - Three stalls, 864 sq Note: Upper level living space included in total building area. es not include an attached garage The home on the property do In conjunction with the conditional use permit request, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance to exceed the maximum 750 square foot area requirement applied to detached accessory buildings. As noted, the applicant wishes to construct a building measuring between 832 and 1,344 square feet in size. Analysis: Conditional Use Permit. A conditional use permit is required for the construction of detached garages. According to the applicant, the new garage would replace an existing single stall garage that is currently in a state of disrepair. As noted, the applicant has submitted four alternative garage plans for consideration ranging in size from 832 to 1,344 square feet in size. The plans differ significantly in terms of size, design (roof style) and apparent finish materials. As shown on the submitted site plan, the proposed accessory structure (regardless of chosen alternative) will meet the required 10 feet side and read yard setback requirement. According to the Ordinance, accessory buildings located within residential zoning districts may not exceed 15 feet in height. Building height is measured from the average grade of the front building line to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. It appears that the height of some of the proposed garage alternatives may exceed such requirement. As a condition of CUP approval, the proposed structure must comply with maximum height requirement of the Ordinance. If the applicant wishes to seek a variance from the 15 foot height requirement, the submission of an additional variance application would be required. The alternative garage plans appear to have differing finish materials including horizontal siding, vertical siding and stone. As a condition of CUP approval, a specific plan alternative should be selected by the applicant. Such plan, drawn to scale, should be modified to specify proposed finish materials, colors and structure height. In consideration of the CUP request, an assurance should be made that the proposed accessory building will be compatible with the site's principal building. To ensure compatibility, it is recommended that the garage match the principal building in color. While not a specific requirement, it the applicant is also encouraged to match the principal building's roof style and roof pitch. According to the Ordinance, only one private garage, either attached or detached, is allowed for each principal residential structure. Thus, it is recommended that the existing detached structure upon the property be removed and re-established in turf and/or driveway pavement as a condition of CUP approval. 2 square riance. The applicant has requested a variance to exceed sh The aimum 750 _n_nI cant has V_a— foot area requirement applied to detached avvvvfrom 832 to 1,344 square feet in size. submitted four building plan alternatives ranging To be specifically noted is that the calculation of eveldisgo be f'area �� hed and used ass not include par T p level cold storage space. If however, the upper I vin area — that is, finished and heated for human occupancy - it is included working or living in the building area calculation. ' 's typical standard for variance approval has been an examination of whether or The City Yp ert to not the property can be put to reasonable use without a variann he proper y or no p + property that creates a hardship in putting there is a condition of the p p Y g applicant to reasonable use. This has been a rigorous standard to meet, requiring an show that without the variance, the property was, essentially, not usable. y the Earlier this month, the legislature passed a new statute languach was signed ge between municipalities palities Governor. This revised statute attempts to make hardship" eferences with the "°p ractical and counties more compatible and replaces sasfo lows difficulties" language. The relevant section i To hear requests for variances from the Rt nirnl dernanstra nh i`+rion ' i - r�nT cgotiar� �°r�+Ft inc ding requirements of the zonshall o lrdinare beluermittedtwhen thelaare in harmonywith nonconformities. Variances the general Pu'Poses and intent of the ordinance amay when the vara when the consistent with the com rehensive Ian. Variances fticulties in a licant for the variance establishes that there are practical n connection with the in with the zonin ordinance. "Practical difficulties as use t r pro to he granting of a variance means that the ro ert ning ordinannce,.the plight of the ed in a reasonable manner not ermitted b the zonin o the propertynot created by the Ian downer is due to circumstances uniquw�ll not alter the essential character off the landowner,, and the variance, if granted, do not constitute locality. Economic considerations alone shat4 -- - -4, , b vsl�es practical difficulties, The receding deletes language requiring "hardship", as well as the a variance lance if it t of T p "reasonable use". Instead, the statute states that the City "may' grant g " ractical difficulties" in using the property in a reasonable manner that is not find p allowed under the ordinance "use" variances are still not allowed — this refers to varying from performance standards in the ordinance). 3 In summary, the City must find the following: • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. • The ordinance prohibits this manner of use. • The proposed manner of use is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and with the Comprehensive Plan. • The ordinance creates "practical difficulties" in achieving the manner of use. • The difficulties are unique to the property and not created by the owner. • The variance will not alter the essential character of the "locality„. Under this standard, the applicant no longer has to show that the ordinance prohibits City finds these tests to be met by the request, the City "may” approve a any reasonable use, only that his/her request is using the property reasonabvariance. ly. If the The new statutory language gives the City, at least in theory, more flexibility as to may consider approval of a variancewhen it . Along with any increase in flexibility, however, comes a less predictable result. In consideration of the applicant's variance request (from the maximum area requirement applied to detached accessory buildings), the following should be considered: The City has established that a detached accessory building measuring 750 square feet in size is the maximum or "reasonable" limit upon residentially zoned properties. In this regard, a detached accessory structure exceeding this requirement could be deemed "unreasonable" within the context a single family residential neighborhood. In informal conversation, the applicant has indicated that his neighborhood is characterized by "oversized" accessory buildings. In this regard, the applicant believes his proposed building would be consistent in size with other area buildings. In review of aerial photography in the area, the subject neighborhood is in fact characterized by detached accessory building many of which appear to exceed 750 square feet in size. Also to be noted is that many properties in the area have multiple detached accessory structures. On one hand, the existence of large accessory structures in the area may provide a basis to determine the applicant's request (for a detached accessory structure in excess of 750 square feet) as being "reasonable". On the other hand, it is important to note that many of the oversized structures (and multiple structures on a single lot) in the area likely exist as nonconformities. In this regard, question arises whether or not the existence of conditions, which fail to meet current Code requirements, should be a basis for further proliferation of oversized accessory structures. 51 Action Requested: Following the p ublic hearing, the Planning Commission may make one of the following recommendations: A. Conditional Use Permit ions based on a finding 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Per eine th the itntent of the Conditional Use that the proposed structure is consistent Conditions may include the Permit clause allowing detached garages. following: uested accessory structure area variance, a. The City approve the req — OR - The applicant revises his request to meet the 750 square foo maximum floor area. b. A specific plan alternative be selected by the applicant. Such plans, drawn to scale, shall be modified to specify proposed finish materials, colors and structure height. C. The garage not exceed 15 feet in height. d. The garage match the principal building in color and show compatibility in materials. licant consider matching the garage's roof style and roof e: The app pitch with that of the principal building. f The existing detached accessory structure on the site be removed e . and re-established in turf and/or pavement as a part of this p j Denial of the Conditional Use Permit based on a finding that the proposed 2. De properties - B. ernes. garage would adversely affect surrounding p p g, Variance A roval of the Variance as submitted based upon the following findings: 1 pp a. The proposed detached accessory building is able into ceeet all other requirements of the Mendota Heights Zoning O b. The proposed accessory structure is of a size common to the neighborhood. C. The proposed accessory building is consistent with directives of the Comprehensive Plan in that it represents reinvestment in the City's 5 existing housing stock and the removal of an existing, deteriorated structure. d. Construction of the oversized accessory structure will allow vehicles and equipment currently stored outdoors to be stored indoors. As a consequence, such vehicles and equipment will no longer be visible from adjacent properties. e. Construction of the proposed detached accessory building will allow the subject property to be used in a "reasonable" manner. The applicant has shown "practical difficulties" in complying with the strict terms of the Ordinance, which would otherwise prohibit the Proposed accessory building size. 2. Denial of the Variance based on the following findings: a. The proposed accessory building is not consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance in that it exceeds the area limit which the City has determined to be "reasonable" within residential zoning districts. b. The amount of accessory storage space proposed upon the subject site could conceivably occur without need for a variance (via a combination of attached and detached garages). C. Approval of the proposed accessory building would set an undesirable precedent in regard to the allowance of future oversized structures. d. The proposed accessory building does not constitute a "reasonable" use of the subject property. Staff Recommendation; While Planning staff is supportive of the conditional use permit to allow a detached accessory structure upon the subject property, Staff does not recommend approval of the associated variance to allow the structure to exceed 750 square feet in size. For the CUP, it has been common for the City to approve ldings in neighborhoods where this type of structure is common, and here the building (meets the code requirements for size, location and setback. The purpose of the CUP provision is to ensure that such buildings can compatibly exist on the proposed parcel under these conditions. With regard to the variance, however, a different review standard applies. One of the key factors still existing in the new statute is uniqueness — a condition must be present that sets the property apart from others that is driving the need for a variance. The applicant's property is not uncommon in Mendota Heights or the R-1 zoning areas. It 0 would not appear to planning staff that even under a new standard, that the �quiements for ��arianr-e roncideration are present. etached sory Although the subject area is characters d reinforces the notion by some dthat structures of such size structures, their nonconforming status are not consistent with the City's long-term vis io eThus, varianceistence of such structures should not justify approval of the reqs SupplementarV Materials: Application materials dated May 2, 2011 7 2242 Lexington Ave S • Site Location Map �x Water/Wetlands City Roads Major Roads p arcels Municipal Boundaries �y �5 � �� rxr6& CEO Heights APPLICATfON FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. H — Y Date of Application —� S 2-jIo Fee Paid �r5v Applicant #ame: FL)etS P LL — _ F PH: (Last) (First) M — — E -Mail Addre s.s: Address: �- EtAl (Number & Street) - (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: (Last) (First) (M) ---- Address- (Number & Street' Cit---- -------�-- ( 0 (State) (Zip) Sti,eei LOcalion Of rroperfyGf c:i� ii t(iEf 1 Legal Lescription & PIN of Property- (Complete Legal from Title or Deed rani st be protided) Type of Request: -----Rezoning Variance ___`_Conditional Use Permit _—Subdivision Approval _Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Wetlands Permit Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Critical Area Permit ---.--Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Other (attach explanation) Applicable City Ordinance Number i` — Section Present Zoning of Property _:'2_ Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property_ 4 -Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect th&.move property during daylight hours. (Signature of Applicant) Date Received f (Signature of Owner) 1101 Wetaida Mendota HeAghts, MIS s 5118 - Q6510 452-1e350 ° FAX (651) 452-89&0 Www.mendrugto-fine6ghts.00BH Notification List — 2242 Lexington Ave PAUL E ANDERSON 2234 LEXINGTON AVE S MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 THOMAS WOHLERS 2218 LEXINGTON AVE S MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 ERIC DOKKEN 2210 LEXINGTON AVE S MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 DEAN HOBBS 1057 WAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 LAURENE BUCKMILLER 1053 WAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 JEROLD & LOIS HOBBS 1065 WAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 TIMOTHY M & DIANE C GILLESPIE 1064 WAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 MARK R & CAROL A CEMENSKY 2250 LEXINGTON AVE S MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 ROGER D TST MANTHEY 2258 LEXINGTON AVE S MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 ST GABRIEL ERITREAN ORTHODOX 1062 WAGON WHEEL TRL MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 CATHOLIC CEMETERY 244 DAYTON AVE SAINT PAUL MN 55102-1802 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING May 4, 20 i i TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of May 24, 201ota 8hts 1 in he meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as p l N possible thereafter, on Tuesday, Minnesota, o City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, consider an application from Paul Elias to request a e at 2242 Lexinton Avenue and a variance for a deta f edo gar S 70 FT of N 440gFT of Lot 5, conditional use permit So. The legal description for this property is as Carolines Lake View (PID #27-16400-00-054). uest for a conditional use permit is to construct a detached garage, the The req larger than 750 square feet. request for a variance is to build the garage of the This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter Ito this regdu to wi Heights he ty Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference at this meeting. Sandie Thone City Clerk re available upon request at least 120 hours Auxiliary aids for disabled persons a in advance. if a notice of less than 120 de theurs ' aids, however this s received, th,mayM not be Heights will make every attempt prov i Please coo ntact City Administrator at 452-1850. possible on short notice. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golders Valley, MN 55422 55 f=acsimile: 703.2.3 1.2601 planners@nacplanning.coiis lelephOne: 763.231.25 MEMORANDUM Background and Description of Request New Cingular Wireless, LLC is requesting approval of Conditional o towerl Use located mit (CUP) P) to allow modification to their existing wireless communicationliwer l wish to upgrade 494 and west of Highway 55 (1196 Northland Drive). The app the communication equipment located on the tower to ensure successful, secure and ongoing operation of their communication facilities. The primary equipment change involves the replacement of six existing he new antennas (affixed to the tower) with a three -sided, nine antenna array. To support antenna array, the applicants also propose to add a platform. Currently, the antennas are supported by a network of steel bars, rather than the more solid platform. The addition of this platform will be the primary visual change to the facility. The existing tower measures 126 feet in height. No changes to the tower height are proposed. Mendota Heights Planning Commission TO: Bob Kirmis / Steve Grittman FROM: DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 Conditional Use Permit for a Wireless Antenna Modification SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 11-13; NAC Case 254.04 - 11.17 CASE NO: APPLICANT(S): New Cingular Wireless, LLC LOCATION: 1196 Victoria Curve ZONING: I, Industrial GUIDE PLAN: Industrial Background and Description of Request New Cingular Wireless, LLC is requesting approval of Conditional o towerl Use located mit (CUP) P) to allow modification to their existing wireless communicationliwer l wish to upgrade 494 and west of Highway 55 (1196 Northland Drive). The app the communication equipment located on the tower to ensure successful, secure and ongoing operation of their communication facilities. The primary equipment change involves the replacement of six existing he new antennas (affixed to the tower) with a three -sided, nine antenna array. To support antenna array, the applicants also propose to add a platform. Currently, the antennas are supported by a network of steel bars, rather than the more solid platform. The addition of this platform will be the primary visual change to the facility. The existing tower measures 126 feet in height. No changes to the tower height are proposed. The Zoning Ordinance allows for wireless communication towers and antennas in all zoning districts upon approval of a conditional use permit. Analysis As noted, the applicants wish to upgrade its communication equipment to ensure successful, secure and ongoing operation of their communication facilities. Specific modifications to the communication tower include the following: • The replacement of six existing antennas with nine new antennas. • The replacement of three tower -mounted amplifiers with six amplifiers. • The addition of three remote radio heads (shoebox-sized devices attached next to the antennas). • The addition of a surge protector. • The addition of related RET, DC power and fiber optic cables • The addition of a platform structure supporting the new antennas As noted, no changes to the tower height are proposed. The new antenna array is to be three -sided with each side measuring 12'6" (horizontal dimension). The horizontal distance of the new antennas from the tower will be slightly less than that of the existing antennas to be removed. The proposed communication equipment upgrades will not result in any significant physical changes to the tower. The visual change will relate primarily to the addition of the platform noted above. Because the tower is surrounded by industrial property, these impacts are considered to be consistent with other mechanical equipment elements in the area. Action Requested Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations.- A. ecommendations: A. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with conditions, based upon a finding that the proposed antenna and accessory equipment modifications meet all of the Zoning Ordinance requirements and is consistent with the intent of the Conditional Use Permit criteria allowing such features. Conditions may include.- 1. nclude: 1. A building permit shall be obtained prior to new antenna and related equipment installation. 2 2 The new antennas and related equipment shall comply with all FCC regulations. 3. The new antennas and related equipment shall comply with all applicable electrical codes. B. Denial of the Conditional Use Permit odif cations ed on a are' ng onsist nthat the pwiph the osed antenna and accessory equipment m Zoning Ordinance and/or the Comprehensive Plan, Staff Recommendation The proposed antenna and related equipment moodieirctaeS nThe addition of the three new s to the communication tower will have no physical impact upon neighboring properties. antennas and the support platform will have some visual impact, but is not considered to be out of character with the industrial area in hick the tower is located. it the in mind, our office recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject preceding conditions. Supplementa►y Materials: Application Materials Dated May 9, 2011 3 Men- duota- N v E � ghts Viu i r7Cwrla :,.un ve Mendint`a Heights, MN 55118; 651 452 1850 e4 5.x. �,ia eiu iLc �B tF�rt 1It APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. 7-011 - 11 Date of Application ffl { ��.?..l.j: Fee Paid C Applicant Name: (Last) (First) (M} E -Mail Address= Com) V 1-- i �0 ce n s 1, ce /q Address: ?`r F/�,` t,' '�/"f �d ✓i.= ✓' .r'i Jtu.� E f 4f t .ti4 aT (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: (,1 Address: (Number & Street) (First) (M) Nerirfi'pTctc�c��it�.. 1�ah1id' (City) `1 (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: /+1 ?6, %A)/Lj JAt,,a bloUj- h(eio,,is Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) '12 VF 'ME 9E 'q uF8-31 UItNt aiF,;u �t i�liN(�t ?� bvt DIt(�('iFl Type of Request: Rezoning X Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. 1 further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. (Signature of Applicant) Date Received . (Signature of Owner) Conditional Use Permit Checklist Wireless (modified 212011) Page 1 of _EXHIBIT Lease Tract AT&T Description of Lease Tract and of Access and Utility Easement (page one ast A lease tract; and also, access and utility tracts lying in the South hOne-halfa described aof the s follows: Quarter of Section 34, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, Transportation of Commencing at Monument B-] ght of 1 as shown 54on minutesSnnesota D6se ondstE� (b s of bearings: the Way Plat No. 19-33; thence North 73 degreesPlat No. 19 - line 47 minutes 16 seconds West) along the South line from Monument B-11 to Monument B-12 as shown on MN -DOT Right -of- aY 33 has an assumed bearing of North 19 degreesas'described in line of the utility easement benefitting Northern States Power Company, alongthe easterly line of said Document Number einem , a distance of 100.21 feet to the southeast corner easterly said utility easement; thence north 19 degrees 47 minutes 16 seconds Weiof the Lease Area to be utility easement, a distance of 5.57 feet to the point of beginning 19 degrees 47 minutes 16 described; thence continuing onthe Last described coursece of 75.39 feet; thence second degrees t °11 the minute sel9 seconds East 34 2 fee thence South 30 d grees 48 minutes 41 ly line of said utility easement, a North South 59 degrees 11 minutes 19 seconds West 46.84 feet, more seconds East 74.00 feet; thence or less, to the point of beginning• over, under and across) 10 feet on either side of the Together witji an easement for access (over and across) and utility purposes, 10 access easement being 20 feet in width and lyingsement, the easterly line of which, following two described centerlines and a 6 foot wide utility lies 10 feet westerly of and pazallel with the following described centerline Number 1: Centerline Number 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Commencing at Monument B-11 as shown on Mmn shown DOT R/W Plat No. 19-33 has an Way Plat Commencing No. t Mo thence NoRh 73 degrees 54 minutes 56 seconds East (basis of bearings_Ahe line from Monument B-11 to Monument B-12 as 16 secondon s West) along the South line of the assumed beating of North 19 degrees 47 min described in Document utility easement benefitting Northern States Power Company, easement; Number 628272, a distance of 1, 00.21 feet to the southeast comer of said utility utility thence North 19 degrees 47 6 feetethence North s 16 seconds 3,9 degreeest s 9eeal rri nutes 47 secondsterly line of s West 167.40 easement a distance of 80.9 feet, feet; thence North 29hdeo weay line of Northland Drivinutes 19 seconds e,and lsaid centerline there ore or lterrnmatiness, to agint on the southerly Rig Continued on next page Letter of Intent New Cingular Wireless, LLC, (aka AT&T Mobility) is requesting a Conditional Use Permit regarding the approaching modification work taking place at an existing wireless communication facility located at 1196 Northland Drive Mendota Heights, MN. This property is owned by the City of Mendota Heights. As a result of technological improvements, Cingular/AT&T will be upgrading its communication equipment to ensure the successful, secure and ongoing operation of its communication facilities. The specific upgrade activity will involve maintenance and upgrading of antennas at the telecommunication site by replacing the existing six (6) antennas with nine (9) new antennas, replacing the three (3) existing Tower Mounted Amplifiers (TMAs) with six (6) new TMAs and adding three (3) RRHs (TMAs and RRHs are small shoe box size devices attached next to the antennas), adding one (1) Raycap Surge Protector, adding one 3/8" RET cable, one %" DC Power Cable and one (1) W' fiber optic cable. New Cingular Wireless, LLC respectfully requests that this Conditional Use Permit request be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval. r j n� June 3, 2011 City of Mendota Heights Attention: Jake Sedlacek 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 p,ue1j Consukt.;ing, .Inc. 2324 University Avenue West, Suite 200 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114-1854 (651) 225-0792 www buellconsulting corn Site Acquisition Permitting Established 1991 Re: Planning Case File #2011-13 AT&T Request for Conditional Use Permit tower: 1196 Northland Drive, Mendota Heights, MN Antenna change at existing Dear Mr. Sedlacek: Pursuant to your request in your letter dated May 13, 2011, 1 enclose revised construction drawings that include the additional information and details you requested. I understand that this matter will be scheduled for a public hearing and planning commission meeting on June 28 and will be on the agenda of the City Council on July 5. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Renee Fontaine Consultant to Buell Consulting/AT&T (t) 773-530-1708 rkzco�in°Pmsn.com 9 0 C)= O W W n tj _Zo� EW 00 p W m � ZOw (D DOF J In Z m K FF W Q = W 0 O O Z Z WN 0 N Z Q �M W Noo\ oog N I- U 171 r U II I 1 I Ll uu u u u uuulwlulul0lulul NOTE I. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE THE TOWER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS/DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR DIRECTIONS ON CABLE DISTRIBUTION/ROUTING. EXISTING DIPLEXERS TO BE vc REMOVED AND REPLACED PER REDS PROPOSED LTE C-9 EQUIPMENT INSTALLED / IN EXISTING FIF RACK— ST PROPOSED 4A GPS ANTENNA �(FIELD LOCATE) C-7 ^ E>:ISi O cv,15i:xG EXIST N-1cc W LOU7_%.cN" crLTEF \ V G N N P I tr I V1, ~ J �5 IJJ®IJJ® Iw LTE: FIF: TDMA: CDMA: GSM: UMTS: SITE PLAN LONG TERM EVOLUTION RRH: FACILITY INTERFACE FRAME RET: TIME DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS TMA: CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS CMU: GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS GPS: UNIVERSAL MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM HVAC: ACRONYM LEGEND REMOTE RADIO HEAD REMOTE ELECTRICAL TILT TOWER MOUNTED AMPLIFIER CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM HEATING VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING SCALE: 1 /4' =1'-0' PROPOSED EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PRDPOSEO 'A GPS ANTENNA C ,� (FIELD LOCATE) SCALE:. 318'=]'—Cr ,In � 4300 MARKETPOINTE DR - BLOOMINGTON . MN 55435 BLACK & VEATCH 10950 GRANDVIEW DRIVE OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 66210 (913) 458-2000 PROJECT NO: 169619 DRAWN BY: ADS CHECKED BY: GAH I 05/31/11 REVSm PER [ C04WEHM 0 03/21/11 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION REV DATE DESCRIFDON r' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: BRUCE GOCKEL SIGNATURE: DATE: 5 3/ LICENSE # 45038 IT 15 A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON. UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PRDFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT, M N L03071 _ 17 42 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1196 NORTHLAND DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 LTE - MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN & EQUIPMENT LAYOUT SHEET NUMBER C-1 EXISTING MOUNT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY /A\ / I I_.._ .- . c c C D PROPOSED LTE ANTENNA & MOUNTING PIPE C-7 (1) PER SECTOR -� MAX. ANTENNA TIP 1 O ELEVATI N 1 6' 120 - PROPOSED AT&TLTE RRH To BE MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE 1 EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW ANTENNAS. REPLACE EXISTING TMA'S WITH POWERWAVE TWIN DUAL BAND TMA'S CL O ELEVATION 122' PROPOSED SURGE H SUPPRESSOR BANDED C TO MONOPOLE Irl ( EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS AND ! I MOUNTING ARMS TO BE REMOVED -��---_ CL O ELEVATION 95' I THE EXISTING TOWER IS CURRENTLY BEING ANALYZED BY OTHERS TO DETERMINE ITS STRUCTURAL CAPACITY TO CARRY THE PROPOSED NEW COAX AND ANTENNAS, THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN CREATED BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS WILL SHOW THAT THE TOWER HAS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED NEW LOADS. INSTALLATION OF THE COAX AND ANTENNAS SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN APPROVED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN RECENED BY THE ! OWNER OR AT&T HAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 1/2"0 U -BOLT 31/8"0X4-_" P.. 1/2'0 DOUBjEBOLT 1.9'0X12' -6 5/B-0 U -BOLT A THIS PIPE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A LONGER PIPE IF NEEDED FOR ANTENNA MOUNTING LATE AND HANDRAIL SUPPORT -L�. • ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPES IF AeVKUAIMAIt ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAIL NO SCALE A (1) PROPOSED DC POWER / C e BUNDLE AND (1) FIBER U BNDLE FOR PROPOSED / �.- L7E ANTENNA EQUIPMENT NOTES ;12) EXISTING AT&T 1 5/8' :OAX TO BE REMOVED AND ?EPLACED WITH (12) 1 5/6" COAX PER RFDS ROUTED INSIDE MONOPOLE 1. WEATHERPROOFING OF ALL COAX CABLE SHALL BE PERFORMED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, 2. FIBER TO BE ROUTED WITH LONG SWEEPING BENDS. NO 90' BENDS ARE ALLOWED. SITE ELEVATION I SCALE: 1/B'=I' CC I COAX ROUTING DETAIL NOT 70 SCALE GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CABLES SHALL BE GROUNDED WITH CABLE GROUNDING KITS. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. A. GROUNDING AT THE ANTENNA LEVEL. B. GROUNDING AT MID LEVEL, WHEN TOWERS WHICH ARE OVER 200', ADDITIONAL CABLE GROUNDING REQUIRED, C. GROUNDING AT BASE OF TOWER PRIOR TO TURNING HORIZONTAL. D. 'ROUNDING OUTSIDE THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT ENTRY PORT. E. GROUNDING INSIDE THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT THE ENTRY PORT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GROUNDING BAR DOWNLEADS ARE TO BE TERMINATED TO THE EXISTING ADJACENT GROUNDING BAR DOWNLEADS A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 4'-0" BELOW GROUNDING BAR. TERMINATIONS MAY BE EXOTHERMIC OR COMPRESSION. 3- THE SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE ANTENNA AND THE CABLE CONFIGURATION, MAKE AND MODELS, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. ANTENNA CONTRACTOR SHALL PURCHASE A 12-6" LOW PROFILE PLATFORM MOUNT WITH HANDRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY SUB -CONTRACTOR - 5. ALL CONNECTIONS FOR HANGERS, SUPPORTS, BRACING, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER TOWER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION & RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE THE TOWER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS/DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR DIRECTIONS ON CABLE DISTRIBUTION/ROUTING. COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE NOTES 1. TYPES AND SIZES OF THE ANTENNA CABLE ARE BASED ON ESTIMATED LENGTHS. PRIOR TO ORDERING CABLE, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LENGTH BASED ON CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT AND NOTIFY THE PROJECT MANAGER IF ACTUAL LENGTHS EXCEED ESTIMATED LENGTHS. 2. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE DOWN -TILT OF EACH ANTENNA WITH A DIGITAL LEVEL 3. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM COAX COLOR CODING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO 'ANTENNA SYSTEM LABELING STANDARD" ND -00027 REFER TO THE LATEST VERSION. .. - 4. ALL JUMPERS TO THE ANTENNAS FROM THE MAIN TRANSMISSION UNE WILL BE 1/2- D!A. LDF AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 6"-0-. - 5. ALL COAXIAL CABLE WILL BE SECURED TO THE DESIGNED SUPPORT STRUCTURE, IN AN APPROVED MANNER, AT DISTANCES NOT TO EXCEED 4'-0' OC. 6. CONTRACTOR MUST FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING BOTH THE INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING OF ALL COAXIAL CABLES, CONNECTORS, ANTENNAS, AND ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT. 7. WEATHERPROOF ALL ANTENNA CONNECTORS WITH SELF AMALGAMATING TAPE. WEATHERPROOFING SHALL BE COMPLETED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH AT&T STANDARDS. ANTENNA MOUNTING NOTES 1. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANTENNA SUPPORTS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ANSI/TIA-222 STANDARDS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL STEEL MATERIALS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A123 "ZINC (HOT -DIP GALVANIZED) COATINGS ON IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL BOLTS, ANCHORS AND MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153 -ZINC-COATING (HOT -DIP) ON IRON AND STEEL HARDWARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4- DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES SHALL BE REPAIRED BY COLD GALVANIZING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A780. 5- ALL ANTENNA MOUNTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCK NUTS, DOUBLE NUTS AND SHALL BE TORQUED TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS., 6. ANTENNA SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPES ARE PLUMB AND LEVEL. 7, MULTI PORT ANTENNAS: TERMINATE UNUSED ANTENNA PORTS WITH CONNECTOR CAP & WEATHERPROOF THOROUGHLY. JUMPERS FROM THE TMA'S MUST TERMINATE TO OPPOSITE POLARIZATION'S IN EACH SECTOR. B. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD THE SERIAL ;f. SECTOR. AND POSITION OF EACH ACTUATOR INSTALLED AT THE ANTENNAS AND PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTATION TO AT&T. 9. LINES I & 2 TO HAVE TMA'S MOUNTED ON PIPE BELOW ANTENNAS AS CLOSE TO ANTENNA AS FEASIBLE PREFERABLY IN A VERTICAL POSITION. 1D. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANTENNA PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING. 11. ANTENNAS TO BE PRE -SWEPT PRIOR TO INSTALLING ON TOWER. 12. ACTUATORS TO BE PRESET PRIOR TO INSTALLING ON TOWER, 13. BOOM AZIMUTH TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO CURRENT RFDS, 4300 MARKET POINTE DR, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55435 I a]. BLACK & VEATCH 1095D GRANDVIEW DRIVE OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS _66210 (913) 458-2000 PROJECT NO: 159619 DRAWN BY: ADS CHECKED BY: GAH (1) PROPOSED DC POWER ' BUNDLE AND (1) PROPOSED FIBER BUNDLE FOR PROPOSED LTE ANTENNA EQUIPMENT A ChRR ER L4 IF —r?:KTL�r, aTn: Irl'i 7 STEL E4 I , jml 1/2"0 U -BOLT 31/8"0X4-_" P.. 1/2'0 DOUBjEBOLT 1.9'0X12' -6 5/B-0 U -BOLT A THIS PIPE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A LONGER PIPE IF NEEDED FOR ANTENNA MOUNTING LATE AND HANDRAIL SUPPORT -L�. • ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPES IF AeVKUAIMAIt ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAIL NO SCALE A (1) PROPOSED DC POWER / C e BUNDLE AND (1) FIBER U BNDLE FOR PROPOSED / �.- L7E ANTENNA EQUIPMENT NOTES ;12) EXISTING AT&T 1 5/8' :OAX TO BE REMOVED AND ?EPLACED WITH (12) 1 5/6" COAX PER RFDS ROUTED INSIDE MONOPOLE 1. WEATHERPROOFING OF ALL COAX CABLE SHALL BE PERFORMED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, 2. FIBER TO BE ROUTED WITH LONG SWEEPING BENDS. NO 90' BENDS ARE ALLOWED. SITE ELEVATION I SCALE: 1/B'=I' CC I COAX ROUTING DETAIL NOT 70 SCALE GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CABLES SHALL BE GROUNDED WITH CABLE GROUNDING KITS. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. A. GROUNDING AT THE ANTENNA LEVEL. B. GROUNDING AT MID LEVEL, WHEN TOWERS WHICH ARE OVER 200', ADDITIONAL CABLE GROUNDING REQUIRED, C. GROUNDING AT BASE OF TOWER PRIOR TO TURNING HORIZONTAL. D. 'ROUNDING OUTSIDE THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT ENTRY PORT. E. GROUNDING INSIDE THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT THE ENTRY PORT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GROUNDING BAR DOWNLEADS ARE TO BE TERMINATED TO THE EXISTING ADJACENT GROUNDING BAR DOWNLEADS A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 4'-0" BELOW GROUNDING BAR. TERMINATIONS MAY BE EXOTHERMIC OR COMPRESSION. 3- THE SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE ANTENNA AND THE CABLE CONFIGURATION, MAKE AND MODELS, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. ANTENNA CONTRACTOR SHALL PURCHASE A 12-6" LOW PROFILE PLATFORM MOUNT WITH HANDRAIL TO BE INSTALLED BY SUB -CONTRACTOR - 5. ALL CONNECTIONS FOR HANGERS, SUPPORTS, BRACING, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER TOWER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION & RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE THE TOWER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS/DESIGN DRAWINGS FOR DIRECTIONS ON CABLE DISTRIBUTION/ROUTING. COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE NOTES 1. TYPES AND SIZES OF THE ANTENNA CABLE ARE BASED ON ESTIMATED LENGTHS. PRIOR TO ORDERING CABLE, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LENGTH BASED ON CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT AND NOTIFY THE PROJECT MANAGER IF ACTUAL LENGTHS EXCEED ESTIMATED LENGTHS. 2. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE DOWN -TILT OF EACH ANTENNA WITH A DIGITAL LEVEL 3. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM COAX COLOR CODING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO 'ANTENNA SYSTEM LABELING STANDARD" ND -00027 REFER TO THE LATEST VERSION. .. - 4. ALL JUMPERS TO THE ANTENNAS FROM THE MAIN TRANSMISSION UNE WILL BE 1/2- D!A. LDF AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 6"-0-. - 5. ALL COAXIAL CABLE WILL BE SECURED TO THE DESIGNED SUPPORT STRUCTURE, IN AN APPROVED MANNER, AT DISTANCES NOT TO EXCEED 4'-0' OC. 6. CONTRACTOR MUST FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING BOTH THE INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING OF ALL COAXIAL CABLES, CONNECTORS, ANTENNAS, AND ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT. 7. WEATHERPROOF ALL ANTENNA CONNECTORS WITH SELF AMALGAMATING TAPE. WEATHERPROOFING SHALL BE COMPLETED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH AT&T STANDARDS. ANTENNA MOUNTING NOTES 1. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANTENNA SUPPORTS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ANSI/TIA-222 STANDARDS OR APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL STEEL MATERIALS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A123 "ZINC (HOT -DIP GALVANIZED) COATINGS ON IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL BOLTS, ANCHORS AND MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A153 -ZINC-COATING (HOT -DIP) ON IRON AND STEEL HARDWARE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4- DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES SHALL BE REPAIRED BY COLD GALVANIZING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A780. 5- ALL ANTENNA MOUNTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCK NUTS, DOUBLE NUTS AND SHALL BE TORQUED TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS., 6. ANTENNA SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPES ARE PLUMB AND LEVEL. 7, MULTI PORT ANTENNAS: TERMINATE UNUSED ANTENNA PORTS WITH CONNECTOR CAP & WEATHERPROOF THOROUGHLY. JUMPERS FROM THE TMA'S MUST TERMINATE TO OPPOSITE POLARIZATION'S IN EACH SECTOR. B. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD THE SERIAL ;f. SECTOR. AND POSITION OF EACH ACTUATOR INSTALLED AT THE ANTENNAS AND PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTATION TO AT&T. 9. LINES I & 2 TO HAVE TMA'S MOUNTED ON PIPE BELOW ANTENNAS AS CLOSE TO ANTENNA AS FEASIBLE PREFERABLY IN A VERTICAL POSITION. 1D. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANTENNA PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR INSTALLATION AND GROUNDING. 11. ANTENNAS TO BE PRE -SWEPT PRIOR TO INSTALLING ON TOWER. 12. ACTUATORS TO BE PRESET PRIOR TO INSTALLING ON TOWER, 13. BOOM AZIMUTH TO BE FIELD ADJUSTED BY CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO CURRENT RFDS, 4300 MARKET POINTE DR, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55435 I a]. BLACK & VEATCH 1095D GRANDVIEW DRIVE OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS _66210 (913) 458-2000 PROJECT NO: 159619 DRAWN BY: ADS CHECKED BY: GAH 1 05/31/:1 R£NSED PER CRI' COW-MS 03/2 t/11 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION REV DATE I DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: BRUCE GOC EL SIGNATURE: DATE: - j �'/ T I LICENSE p 45038 R IS A NOTATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. MNL03071-1742 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1196 NORTHLAND DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 LTE - MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE SITE ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER C-2 6-0 APPROXIMATE, BASED UPON ANTENNA ROTATION ON VERTICAL PIPE MOUNT (TYPICAL EACH SECTOR) G%dlV SEC7C? EXISTING ANTENNA & PIPE MOUNT TO BE REMOVED (TYP) ANTENNA LAYOUT AT ELEVATION 95' EXISTING `ANTENNAS / .i PIPE .: DUNTS TO BE REMOVED (TYP) r 29 `EXISTING SUPPORT ARMS TO BE REMOVED (TYP) AND REPLACED WITH 13' PLATFORM I � tt� SIC, OP. 16G ANTENNA LAYOUT AT ELEVATION 122 EXISTING ANTENNA LAYOUT D A PROPOSED LTE ANTENNA & C-7 C -a PIPE MOUNT GAMMA c A PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA SECTOR c-7 C -a & PIPE MOUNT (TYP OF 2) G2 AZIMUTH G1 AZIMUTH 320" D C PROPOSED LTE ANTENNA & 1 �1 II( 41 1 1 �I ITI TRANSMISSION CABLE REQUIREMENTS c-7 c -a PIPE MOUNT ° II SECTOR EXISTING 63 ABOVE BELOW SIDES AZIMUTH PROPOSED COLOR CODE 145' ANTENNA MODEL RAD AZIMUTH ANTENNA MODEL (LTE) RAD C c PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA & PIPE MOUNT (TYP OF 2) B2 A3 AZIMUTH CENTER 18' 169 BETA SECTOR NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS WILL BE REMOVED & REPLACED. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS FOR HANGERS, SUPPORTS, BRACING, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED PER TOWER MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD DETAILS. 3. REMOVE TOWER MOUNTED DIPLEXERS. 4. SEE ANTENNA & TRANSMISSION CABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTENNA POSITION. (SHEET C-3) 5. RRH'S TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN 16.4' (5.0 METERS) OF THE SURGE SUPPRESSOR, (SUBCONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY) G3 AZIMUTH 345' (LTE) 81 AZIMUTH 160' PROPOSED ANTENNA LAYOUT 'ZiMi H ee N v /27]0' 90'® IRO' NOT TO SCALE AT PROPOSED SURGE H AZIMUTH SUPPRESSOR BANDED 99 TO MONOPOLE [-7 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA fl C B �& PIPE MOUNT (NP OF 2) A2 ALPHA AZIMUTH SECTOR 99 PROPOSED AT&T LTE�RRH D E AN BE MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ANc-7 c-7 TENNA MOUNTING PIPE PROPOSED LTE D B _--ANTENNA & A3 PIPE MOUNT AZIMUTH 90" (LTE) PROPOSED PLATFORM N ANTENNA MOUNT �tq P �J4A IRO` NOT TO SCALE NOTES TO CONTRACTOR 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO REFER TO AT&T'S MOST CURRENT RADIO FREQUENCY DATA SHEET (RFDS) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2, CABLE LENGTHS WERE DETERMINED BASED ON A VISUAL INSPECTION DURING SITE WALK. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL LENGTH DURING PRE -CONSTRUCTION WALK. 3. CONTRAC70R TO USE ROSENBERGER FIBER LINE HANGER COMPONENTS (OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL). IA■ SURGE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REMOTE RADIO HEADS (RRH'S) ANTENNA AND TRANSMISSION CABLE REQUIREMENTS (VERIFY WITH CURRENT RFDS) DC CABLE 1 SECTOR EXISTING (MAX. DISTANCE FROM ANTENNA) ABOVE BELOW SIDES ON PROPOSED COLOR CODE SECTOR ANTENNA MODEL RAD AZIMUTH ANTENNA MODEL MECH. ELEC. AZIMUTH RAD FlBER TRUNK FIBER JUMPER RED/BlK A3 ALCATEL - LUCENT (700 MHz) CENTER 18' 8" TILT TILT CENTER 72 RED TRACER w At POWERWAVE 7752 90' 122' KATHREIN 800-10766 90'- - 122 X X 0 A2 16.4' 16� 8" KATHREIN 800-10766 90' - - 122' X X ALCATEL - LUCENT (7DO MHz) 16.4' 16, B 0 t BLUE TRACER rn A3 POWERWAVE 7752 99 122' KATHREIN 800-10766 99 0 7 122' FS -1-980-002-50000 FB-L98B-OD5-5000 B1 POWERWAVE 7752 1617 122' KATHREIN 800-10765 169 - - 122' X X a o m w B2 KATHREIN BDO-10765 169 - - 122' X X N 63 POWERWAVE 7752 169 122' KATHREIN 800-10765 1957 0 6 122' FB-L98B-002-50000 FB-L9BB-005-5000 G1 POWERWAVE 7752 329 95' POWERWAVE P65 -17 -XLH -RR 329 - - 122• X X POWERWAVE 320• - - 122• X X v G2 P65 -17 -XLH -RR G3 POWERWAVE 7752 329 95' POWERWAVE 0 D 722' FB -198B-002-50000 FB -L988-005-5000 P65-17-XLH-RR345 IA■ SURGE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM REMOTE RADIO HEADS (RRH'S) CITY LOCATION RAYCAP DC6-48-60-RM RRH LOCATION MINIMUM CLEARANCES DC CABLE 1 SECTOR RRH TYPE (MAX. DISTANCE FROM ANTENNA) ABOVE BELOW SIDES ON AWG COLOR CODE RED/BlK A3 ALCATEL - LUCENT (700 MHz) 16.4' 18' 8" 0 1 72 RED TRACER w mo 63 ALCATEL - LUCENT (7DO MHz) 16.4' 16� 8" 0 1L12 WHTEDTRACER GBLK 3 ALCATEL - LUCENT (7DO MHz) 16.4' 16, B 0 t BLUE TRACER IA■ SURGE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM MANUFACTURER PART NUMBER CITY LOCATION RAYCAP DC6-48-60-RM 1 MOUNTED INSIDE EXISTING PIF RACK RAYCAP DC6-48-60-18-8F 1 MOUNTED ON EXISTING TOWER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES NOT TO SCALE If 13 It 4300 MARKET POINTE DR. BLOOMINGTON, MN 55435 rr BLACK & VEATCH 10950 GRANDVIEW DRIVE OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 66210 (913) 458-2000 PROJECT NO: 169619 DRAWN BY: ADS CHECKED BY: GAH 1 05/31 11 REVISED PER Ct �YEHTS 0 03/21/11 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION REV I DATE I OESCRIPTIDN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE DF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: BRUCE GOCKEL SIGNATURE: DATE: LICENSE # 45038 R IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, NUTS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. MNL03071_ 1742 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1196 NORTHLAND DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 LTE — MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE ANTENNA LAYOUT & SCHEDULE SHEET NUMBER C-3 POWERWAVE ANTENNA P65 -17 -XLH -RR KATHREIN ANTENNA 800-10766 KATHREIN ANTENNA 800-10765 RADOME MATERIAL: PVC, IP55 RADOME MATERIAL: GRP RADOME MATERIAL: GRP RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY DIMENSIONS, H%W%D: 2438x305x152mm 96'x12 x6" 2438x300x152mm (8'-0"X11.8"x6) I I I I ( ) I I I I DIMENSIONS, HxWzD: DIMENSIONS, HxWxD: 1918x300x152mm (75.5x 11.6'x6') WEIGHT, WITH PRE—MOUNTED BRACKETS: 70 Ibs WEIGHT, WITH PRE—MOUNTED BRACKETS: 61.7 lbs WEIGHT, WITH PRE—MOUNTED BRACKETS: 62 lbs WIND LOAD, FRONTAL/LATERAL/REAR WIND LOAD, FRONTAL/LATERAL/REAR WIND LOAD, FRONTAL/LATERAL/REAR SIDE 42 mpS. Cd=1: 1840 Ibs SIDE 95 mph, Cd=1: 750 Ibs ri CONNECTOR: SIDE 95 mph, Cd=1: 150 Ibs .n x 7/16 DIN FEMALE CONNECTOR: 7/16 DIN FEMALE 1` CONNECTOR: 7/16 DIN FEMALE o�0..00 2" PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NO SCALE PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NO SCALE B PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NO SCALE C I NOT USED I NO SCALE I _ I NOT USED I NO SCALE NOT USED I NO SCALE I _ I NOT USED I NO SCALE NOT USED NOT USED NO SCALE NO SCALE 430D MARKET POINTE DR. BLOOMINGTON, MN 55435 BLACK 11 VEATCH 10950 GRANDVIEW DRIVE OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 65210 (913) 458-2000 PROJECT NO: 169619 DRAWN BY: ADS CHECKED BY: GAH 7 05/JI/ft REVISm PER CfFF COMMLMS U 0]/21/11 ISSUED FOR WMSTRVC7IDN REV DATE DESLRIPTgN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PRINT NAME: BRUCE GOCKEL SIGNATURE- IV. LIZ DATE: 5 J) h' UCENSE # 45038 R IS A ADLATION OF UW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. MNL03071_1742 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1196 NORTHLAND DRIVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 LTE - MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE EQUIPMENT DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C-8 TO: Planning Commission <L FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator. , 'a SUBJECT: Planning Case 2011-14 White Pine Holdings Discussion Attached you will find a copy of the planner's report for planning case 2011-14, an amendment to the conditional use permit for planned unit development approved for Mendota Plaza Redevelopment. Our city attorney has raised two concerns for your consideration in addition to those matters raised in the planner's memorandum. The first concern is making sure that the procedure for this planning consideration is clear. As taken from the Planned Unit Development Agreement (Agreement), the following outlines the city's authority regarding changes to the approved plans: Modifications to Approved Plans. After final approval of the Plans, the Developer shall not make any changes in the Plans or the Project without the prior written consent of the city, which consent may be given or withheld in the city's sole discretion. The attorney also wanted to point out that the Agreement ownership. While it appears thata transfer of some sort has taken place, the city has yet to receive information requesting consent to the transfer as required in the Agreement. The planning applicant should clarify the status of ownership. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsinnile: 952.595.9837 plarnersCiiacpla^iinir .g...C)m MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen W. Grittman DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Mendota Plaza — PUD Amendment for Housing Component on Lot 6, Block 1 CASE NO: Case No. 2011-14, NAC Case 254.04 - 18 APPLICANT(S): White Pine Holdings LOCATION: SE Part of Mendota Plaza PUD, near South Plaza Drive ZONING: MU -PUD GUIDE PLAN: MU -PUD Background and Description of Request. The applicants are seeking a PUD amendment and final PUD approval to accommodate the construction of a four-story, 100 unit senior residential facility. The housing proposal has been an integral part of the PUD approvals granted to Mendota Plaza over the past few years. The proposed site is 2.0 acres in area, and was designated for multiple - family housing as a part of the approved concept plan for Mendota Plaza. The project itself consists of 49 apartment -style units on the upper two floors, a combination of primarily one -bedroom apartments and some efficiency units. The lower two floors contain 51 assisted -style units without kitchen facilities. The basement level of the building accommodates 37 covered parking spaces, along with some storage and mechanical rooms. The first level contains the primary kitchen, office, and a commons area. The second and third levels include serving kitchens and commons areas. The fourth level includes a "lounge", but otherwise does not include common dining area. The site plan orients the building north -south along the easterly property line, adjacent to the open space areas to the east. Driveway access is provided from South Plaza Drive, and provides 26 parking spaces, 2 of which are handicapped accessible. The north end of the parking area provides access to the underground parking garage. Retaining walls protect the driveway as it descends to the lower level of the garage, with a grade differential of about 11 feet. The plans also provide a patio area to the rear (east) of the building. The patio sits above a retaining wall of up to five feet in height overlooking the open space to the east. The application materials include a landscaping plan consisting primarily of open lawn, with some trees and limited shrub plantings. A sidewalk connects the building areas to the patio and to the public sidewalk along South Plaza Drive. Building plans for the project show elevation drawings of a four-story building with a gabled roof or varying peaks, and a total overall height of 65 feet from grade to the peak of the highest gable. The building appears to be clad with vertically-oriented hard -board siding, with the exception of a wainscot wrap along the ground level of brick or cultured stone. The height of the masonry wainscot is not detailed on the plans, but appears to be approximately 3.5 feet in height. Analysis: Since the inception of the City's consideration of the redevelopment proposals for Mendota Plaza, housing has been an important component of the anticipated plans. A portion of the site of the proposed White Pine building was originally zoned R-3, multiple family, and the land to the east and southeast is designated and/or used for high- density residential by the Dakota County housing authority. As the plans evolved for the residential development on this property, the City expressed a number of objectives for the project. These included (1) A building that equaled or exceeded three stories, although unit count was not specified in the approval; (2) Meeting reasonable setbacks to provide adequate green space on the property; (3) Parking that could accommodate the anticipated use and needs of residents, visitors, and employees, including underground parking to limit surface paving, and documentation to support the proposed parking count (assuming that it would vary from the City's basic zoning requirements); (4) Site design that incorporates the project into the surrounding neighborhood and to the commercial project of which it is a part; (5) Building materials that are complementary to the materials being used on the commercial portions of the PUD; (6) Masonry materials that equal or exceed 25% of the building wall surface; (7) Willingness for potential housing developers to accept responsibility for the terms of the development agreement signed with the Mendota Plaza developers (Paster Enterprises); (8) Handling of utilities, including stormwater, that addressed existing utility configurations and open space/wetland issues At this point, there appears to be a number of issues that will require modification to meet the understanding of the City officials. While building height and density would not appear to be at odds with the City's expectations, several site and building issues are either unexplained or inconsistent with previous City directives. These include- Parkinq count. The City's zoning ordinance requires 2 parking spaces per residential unit. The City has indicated, consistent with other standards, that parking for senior - oriented buildings may supply a reduced amount of parking from this standard. However, the applicants are required to document their expected parking needs, based on similar uses or other materials. The applicants have proposed a total of 73 parking spaces (above and below ground) to serve the 100 unit complex. No documentation has been received at this point to verify that adequate parking has been provided with this plan. Pedestrian circulation and access. The project includes some sidewalk access to South Plaza Drive from the main entrance area, which would connect to other sidewalks in the development. An additional sidewalk is shown exiting the north side of the building and leading to the Mendota Plaza commercial areas. Staff would suggest that a stronger pedestrian link is designed from the main entrance to the rest of Mendota Plaza, consistent with the City's intent that the housing component is integral to the mixed-use concept. Building materials. The building materials are not specified in the submitted drawings. However, the illustrations show masonry wrapping the building to a height of 3.5 feet out of a total exposed wall height of 42 feet (the additional 23 feet of height is comprised of roof). The 3.5 foot high masonry constitutes only about 8.3 percent of the wall area, whereas 25 percent is the City's expectation based on previous approvals. This will need to be addressed and modified to comply with the PUD requirements. Signage. The plans show wall signs over the main entrance of the west side and on both north and south end walls of unspecified sizes. In addition, the proposal includes a monument sign near South Plaza Drive and its intersection with the Mendota Plaza access road. In Mendota Heights, setbacks for freestanding signs in residential districts are to be no more 12 square feet in area. The proposed monument sign is approximately 90 square feet. The PUD approvals may grant larger sign areas, however, a rationale for such approval should be provided by the applicant. Lighting details or other aspects of the sign construction also have not been provided at this time. Utility connections. The City has notified the applicants that the proposed building sits over an existing sanitary sewer line which will have to be relocated if the building is to be constructed as proposed. Relocation of the sewer line is the responsibility of the developer of this site. In the alternative, the applicants should design the site to avoid the sewer line and provide adequate access to it for maintenance. The plans submitted by the applicants do not address the necessary changes to the utilities. Development contract. As noted, the applicants will be required to agree to the terms of the development contract affecting the residential portion of the project. A statement to this requirement should be provided by the applicants, prior to City action on the amendment. Action Requested: Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following actions: A. Approval of the PUD amendment with conditions. Conditions would include the following: 1. Verification of parking demand for residents, visitors, and employees to the satisfaction of the City. 2. Additional pedestrian circulation on the site plan that integrates the main entrance area to the remainder of the Mendota Plaza pedestrian system. 3. Clarification of the proposed building materials, including an increase in masonry exterior materials to meet the 25% coverage requirement specified by previous PUD approvals. 4. Additional detail on signage area, materials, and lighting, including reduction of the monument sign to a maximum of 12 square feet of message area, consistent with City zoning requirements. 5. Provision of utility plans illustrating how the applicants intend to provide for relocation of the existing sanitary sewer line, along with other utility access. 6. A statement indicating acceptance of the terms of the development agreement as applying to the developers of the subject site. B. Tabling of action on the PUD amendment, based on the need to submit additional materials demonstrating compliance with the terms of the controlling PUD approvals, as specified in this report and the comments of other City staff. C. Denial of the PUD amendment, based on findings that the applicants have submitted plans that are inconsistent with the terms of the approved PUD documents for the subject property, and inconsistent with City zoning regulations. Inconsistencies are identified in this report and other staff comments, and include the following: 1. Inadequate parking supply. 2. Pedestrian circulation inadequately integrates the residential building into the mixed use PUD as directed by previous PUD approvals. 3. Building materials do not meet the specified requirements of the previous PUD approvals, including amount of masonry exterior, and are otherwise undesignated on the plans. 4. Signage for the project exceeds the zoning ordinance allowances for residential property. 5. Utility plans do not show how the project will connect to the City's sanitary sewer system, among other utility issues, and do not show how the applicants will redesign the project or the sewer to avoid conflicts between the building and City's utility. 6. Lack of acceptance of terms of the original PUD approvals as required by the PUD development contract. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval at this time. There are a number of inconsistencies between the submitted plans and the approved PUD documents, and there are some, particularly the parking, sidewalks, and the sewer line access, that could alter site and building design significantly. If the project is tabled, the applicants should agree in writing to extend the timeline for zoning approvals under Minn. Stat. 15.99 to avoid any issues with dates and review. If the Planning Commission recommends denial, the findings above, and any other findings made that result from information at the public hearing, should be incorporated into the Commission's resolution. Supplementary Materials: 1. Application materials dated 5-10-11 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _►, MEMO DATE: June 28, 2011 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator SUBJECT: Planning Case 2011-14 White Pine Holdings Included in your agenda packet are the application materials for planning case 2011-14, a request by White Pine Holdings on behalf of Mendota Mall Associates. At the time of packet distribution, staff analysis is not yet complete. The staff report will be distributed as soon as it is completed. "F" 'w._ - ✓ rtF �,,� NMendota ffelqhts APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Date of ApT.� oon %i0i i 1 Fee Paid Applicant Name: �Pvv 11(1LJ �� (Last) (First) (M) E -Mail Address: Address: 7 Z'-0 6,ja (NuXb-Street)O,/vner Name:� G (Last) Address: 1��u?l�� (Number & Street) Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Co ` (City).' u (First) 5 C .. (City) (State) - (zip) j (M) d - (State) (Zip) fete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type.of Request- Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Prelirninary/Final.Plat Approval Comprehensive. Plan Amendment Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit =Other Other (attach explanation)�� Applicable City Ordinance Number / V Present Zoning of Property /V Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property � __Proposed Use I hereby declare .that all statements made in this quest I further authorize City Officials and agents to i p e Date Receive Section on additional material are true. 4/prqlperty du.drrg d8* ylight hours. (Signature of Owner) 1101. Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN 55118 • (651) 4S2-1850 FAX (651) 452-8940 S / TTEMM W� m! L T VVV11 Ulf !l L� �11 VLA =§VV§Um VV Ull v\1 u SOoU TH PL A"' ZA DR0V--E GENERAL NOTES: A. TOPOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY SURVEY, INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, EXISTING UTILITIES, SITE TOPOGRAPHY WITH SPOT ELEVATIONS, OUTSTANDING PHYSICAL FEATURES AND EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATIONS WAS PROVIDED BY THE FOLLOWING COMPANY, AS A CONTRACTOR TO THE SELLER/OWNER: TOPOGRAPHY: RLK INCORPORATED BOUNDARY: 6110 BLUE CIRCLE DRIVE, SUITE 100 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 PH: (952) 933-9072 CEI ENGINEERING AND ITS ASSOCIATES WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE SURVEY OR FOR DESIGN ERRORS OR OMISSIONS RESULTING FROM SURVEY INACCURACIES. B. ALL PHASES OF SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE OWNER / DEVELOPER SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, RELATED UTILITIES, PAVING, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND ANY OTHER EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED. SEE SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. D. CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND OTHER MATERIALS RESULTING FROM PREVIOUS AND CURRENT DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. DISPOSAL WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND/OR FEDERAL REGULATIONS GOVERNING SUCH OPERATIONS. E THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. F. WARRANTY/DISCIAIMER• THE DESIGNS REPRESENTED IN THESE PLANS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESTABLISHED PRACTICES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOR THE DESIGN FUNCTIONS AND USES INTENDED BY THE OWNER AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER, NEITHER THE ENGINEER NOR ITS PERSONNEL CAN OR DO WARRANT THESE DESIGNS OR PLANS AS CONSTRUCTED EXCEPT IN THE SPECIFIC CASES WHERE THE ENGINEER INSPECTS AND CONTROLS THE PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTION ON A CONTEMPORARY BASIS AT THE SITE, G. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS OF THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ANY CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION BY THE ENGINEER OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES, IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. T H l lZE�S�C* .1 Vicinity Map Not to Scale PLAN INDEX: 1. COVER SHEET 2. SITE PLAN 3. GRADING PLAN 4. UTILITY PLAN 5. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6. EROSION CONTROL NOTES k DETAILS 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN B. DETAIL SHEET SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS: 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BEFORE Y� U � C Engineering ss, Associates, Inc_ 'LANNERS SURVEYORS S ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 (651) 697-0800 ROSEWLLE, UN 55113 TAX. (651) 697-0804 RESOURCE LIST: WHITE PINE SENIOR LIVING CITY OF MENDTA HEIGHTS 720 MAIN STREET, SUITE 205 1101 VICTORIA CURVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PHONE: (651) 287-0265 PHONE: (651) 452-1850 FAX (651) 287-0266 STEVE GRI TTMAN CHUCK ROTHSTEIN CITY BUILDING DIVISION ARCHITECT CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS RIVER VALLEY ARCHITECIS, INC. 1101 VICTORIA CURVE 13513 COUNTY HWY S SOUTH MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 JIM FALLS, WI 54748 PHONE: (651) 452-1850 PHONE: (715) 382-4700 JAMEY BOWS .IC TY FN IG NEFR/p�B�C_WOR))_DIRESS.OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR CITYOF MENDOTA HEIGHTS HOEFT BUILDERS, INC. 1101 VICTORIA CURVE 310 PINNACLE WAY, SUITE 301 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 EAU CLAIRE, WI 54701 PHONE (651) 452-1850 PHONE: (715) 833-1761 JOHN MAZZITELLO FAX: (715) B33-1720 ASST. TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR PETER HOEFT CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1101 VICTORIA CURVE CIAL CONSULTANT CEI ENGINEERING, INC. MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PHONE: (651) 452-1850 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36 SUITE 200 JAKE SEDLACEK ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 PHONE: (651) 697-0800 FIRE MARSHALL FAX: (651) 697-0804 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT ALAN CATCHPOOL 1101 VICTORIA CURVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PHONE: (651) 452-1850 PAUL KAISER APPROVED DATE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FLOOD CERTIFICATION: THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN AN UNMAPPED FIRM AREA ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Arkonsos * Colifornio * Georgia * Minnesota * Pennsyl vonic * Texas II0 SITE BENCHMARK INE BEST Ao4nNi PRw[Fiv, Y AS RaRM 6 TK SMN-aFsf PR4�FFIT I1H OEv-d6.Y IDRxw¢ 1E181'c snrm� annNo 9asl IauTlos ANo PARKING RATIO SITE DATA SITE AREA (NET) 87,290 S.F. 20D Ac ZONING BSI -SHOPPING IMPERY)OIIS 43,806 S.F. 50.18% GREEN SPACE 43,484 S.F. 49.82% PARKING RATIO STANDARD PARKING (9'X201 • REQUIRED (WYE GROUND) 24 PROVIDED STANDARD PARKING (9'X20') REQUIRED (UNDERGROUND) 37 PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE PARKING (8'X20') 2 REQUIRED 2 PROVIDED TOTAL PARKING 63 PROVIDED 'USE NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED UNDER LOCAL ZONING CODE BffORE YTk7 7\ Qc ss F3 F i Rn q ONE GTil-\' 0 20' 30' 40' SCALE IN FEET EASTING FOUND IRON SANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY UNE ------- EASEMENT UNE ._ WATERMAIN VALVE ... ..... _______ _______ ADJACENT LOT UNE ---- -- SANITARY SEWER UNE FIRE HYDRANT STORM SEWER UNE :-• WAIERMAIN STORM MANHOLE ...._,,1;.-.. .__._.. GAS UNE CATCHSASIN FIBER OPTIC UNE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED BOUNDARY UNE RIGHT OF WAY UNE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL IA. ® CURB INLET BUILDING CONTROL PONT 32 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES OMITS OF SIDEWALKS AND CONCRETE APRONS RETAINING WALL (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) GENERAL SITE NOTES A. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHER.SE NOTED. B. ALL CUR" RETURN RADII SHALL BE 2' OR 10', AS SHOWN TYPICAL ON THIS PLAN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. C- UNLESS OTHERMSE SHOWN, CALLED OUT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS ALL CURB AND GUTTERADJACENT TO ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL IA. PAVEMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL BA OVER THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT AREA AND ALL APPROACH DRIVES ALL PARKING LOT STRIPING INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES SHALL BE PAINTED AS SHOWN. D. ALL PARKING LOT SIGN BASE SUPPORTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 12F. E ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SHALL HAVE SIGNAGE INSTALLED PER DETAIL 95 ❑ SITE DETAILS 1A TYPE 'A' CONCRETE CUR" AND GUTTER 3D CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3K CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3M WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK 3N WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDWALK (TYP. AT EACH DRIVEWAY CURB RETURN) BA STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 9S ACCESSIBLE / VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SGN RU ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL (SEE PAINT COLOR INDICATED AT SYMBOL) IDATRAFFIC FLOW ARROW (TYP-) 108 STOP BAR (TYP.) 11A DO NOT ENTER SIGN 124 SIGN BASE O SITE NOTES 20TRANSFORMER PAD 3DFENCE ENCLOSED PATIO AREA WITH GATES (PER ARCH. PLANS) 48EXIT PORCH (PER ARCH. PLANS) BBOVERHEAD CANOPY - (TYP.-PER ARCH. PLANS) 12A4' TRAFFIC MATE LANE STRIPE (SEE LENGTH INDICATED AT SYMBOL) 12D 4: WIDE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES, ZO' O.C. 0 45' (SEE SIZE INDICATED AT SYMBOL) 13C LIMITS OF RUNNING WALL (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) 15A STOP SIGN 16E MONUMENT SIGN IBA EXISTING TO BE REMOVED 21ATAPER GIRD TO MATCH EYSTING CURB 218 TAPER CURB FROM 6' TO0 OVER 10' 73A VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY OF MENDOTA HFIGITS STANDARD DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS INITIAL DESIGN I D4D-A-UPARaN PALMG s W WHITE PINE SENIOR LMNG r Engineering Associates, Inc. ENGYNEERS PLANNERS SURVEYO45 OSG N M AL 5 2277 NEST HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 (651)697-L4`09 ROSEM(LE MN 551IJ (651)697-D804 S%TE PLAN 5%4/11 N( SOUTH PLAZA DMVE II:56 AM 2 cF 8 La=ArY'rALJCY`J.J7L JMMJ=CY A PRELIM A' / A BENCHMARK fig `� F 2' "�$ aP TOPMl7-HYIXi4M ,s BEV�56.3G -� 4n.��' Tj SD IF 13. ARK / RCP .O 3pX TNH=856.36 FL 2840 6 I 40' . B50 RCP o 100X MH -� xM-11511E p ` INV(Wj-841.86 '.INV(I AN.961 ? 650.6E TC 3 5`•j55 T�( x nV,ul 86$1 6.5 3 hry roy _ �O� , 4? 0 p00Y r hry.0 rya oQC ,F \BSE\ SITE BENCHMARK V+�Qj ss\ .,Isr wum0 msEerc, •.n _ . .�' 851.50 C:_ 0 20' SCALE IN FEET I A' / A BENCHMARK fig `� F 2' "�$ aP TOPMl7-HYIXi4M ,s BEV�56.3G -� 4n.��' Tj SD IF 13. ARK / RCP .O 3pX TNH=856.36 FL 2840 6 I 40' . B50 RCP o 100X MH -� xM-11511E p ` INV(Wj-841.86 '.INV(I AN.961 ? 650.6E TC 3 5`•j55 T�( x nV,ul 86$1 6.5 3 hry roy _ �O� , 4? 0 p00Y r hry.0 rya oQC ,F \BSE\ ®'NE .851.20 C - 951.45-L,.... _.., 375-00 lux SWqTH PLAZA DRIVE 56.42 ;- 1?=270.00 - d=1158 24 " C. 8RG=&' /j 4E �y WORE y� cF' 7\ SITE BENCHMARK V+�Qj ss\ .,Isr wum0 msEerc, •.n _ . .�' 851.50 C:_ 0 20' SCALE IN FEET 82 LF 10 -------------- EASEMENT UNE .. WATERMAIN VALVE --------- - --- ADJACENT LOT UNE S89'5728 W .- FIRE HYDRANT I W I ..._----- . ----- 207 c I 851m C I MANHOLE SH,0.00 W GAS UNE - -... rA _ .. 1 ng RIM 840 SID �N INV(S) B3d40 1 STREET UGHT SUMP 836,40 I 951.45 FG .l t,,I✓ n - x a .DD —645 - I D.oD fG 0 I � 0 Wi .551 i MH 351.15 C RIM=85130,.......' I '',IN V(11)-643.82.......... . PROPOSED '=`= x Ba OD B SENIOR B5 — i B ASSISTED LIVING 96,000± -,S -F. 1,SO C FOU.R-� STORYWITH UNDERGROUND PARKING``c x� FIRST FLOOR FFE 851.50 BASEMENT FFE 840.50 'C 851.50 C i\ " 85130 C 1.20 _ 851.20. FG 1 ; _ I 7 20 .. r INV(SWj-84b.56 ... 130 FC ®'NE .851.20 C - 951.45-L,.... _.., 375-00 lux SWqTH PLAZA DRIVE 56.42 ;- 1?=270.00 - d=1158 24 " C. 8RG=&' /j 4E �y WORE y� cF' 7\ ss\ \ �cD •.n _ . .�' 851.50 C:_ 0 20' SCALE IN FEET — -- EASEMENT UNE .. WATERMAIN VALVE --------- - --- ADJACENT LOT UNE SANITARY SEVER UNE .- FIRE HYDRANT -. .. .... _ .__ M1 STORM SEWER UNESTORM ..._----- . ----- WATERMAIN MANHOLE -- -- -- GAS UNE - .__ _.._ _ .. I Z 7 /1300 - STREET UGHT \ I 951.45 FG .l t,,I✓ n ®'NE .851.20 C - 951.45-L,.... _.., 375-00 lux SWqTH PLAZA DRIVE 56.42 ;- 1?=270.00 - d=1158 24 " C. 8RG=&' /j 4E �y WORE y� cF' 7\ ss\ \ �cD ". SANITARY MANHOLE .q CINE CPQ 0 20' SCALE IN FEET EXISTING FOUND IRON ". SANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE — -- EASEMENT UNE .. WATERMAIN VALVE --------- - --- ADJACENT LOT UNE SANITARY SEVER UNE .- FIRE HYDRANT -. .. .... _ .__ M1 STORM SEWER UNESTORM ..._----- . ----- WATERMAIN MANHOLE -- -- -- GAS UNE CATCHBASIN .__ _.._ FIBER OPTIC UNE ------ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STREET UGHT CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED -- BOUNDARY UNE ---- RIGHT - WAY UNE --- --- GRADE BREAK —XXX— CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ===== STORM DRAIN X7LXX SPOT ELEVATIONS TC - TO' OF GURU G - GUTTER C = CONCRETE TW - TOP OF WALL BW - BOTTOM OF WALL FG - FINISHED GRADE ALL SPOT EIEVATONS ARE GUTTERLINE OR FINISHED GRADE UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. ® PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) GENERAL GRADING NOTES A, PRIM TO INSTALLATION OF STORM OR SANITARY SEWER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, VERIFY, AND CALCULATE ALL CROSSINGS AND INFORM THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER WILL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THE ENGINEER IS NOT NOTIFIED OF DESIGN CONFLICTS B. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY COHSTRUCTON SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH AND 4" CF TOPSOIL APPUED. IF ADEQUATE TOPSOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL. APPROVED BY THE OWNER, AS NEEDED. THE AREA SHALL THEN BE SEEDED, FERPUZED, MULCHED. WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY CRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SEED MIX AND PROPER APPLICATION RATE. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE GONTRACTDR AT NO AODIDONAL COST TO THE OWNER C. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND MERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD, ME INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTUTY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCARON OF UTILITIES. D. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED WT OR SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN THE SPEOFICATONS ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIF1CATONS. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPES ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURES AND ENDS OF FLARED END SECTORS. O GRADING NOTES 9C CONNECT WEST SDE DOWN SPOUTS TO 10' PVC DRAIN PIPE WITH 1X MIN. SLOPE AND 4' MIN. WVER. PERIMETER ROOF DRAIN PIPE TO CONNECT TO MH'S 92 A, 3. (SEE ARCH PLANS FOR EXACT NO. AND LOCATION OF DOWNSPOUTS) 9D FLARED END SECTION 13C LIMITS OF RETAINING WALL (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) IBD MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS LBF CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE ❑ GRADING DETAILS 20A JUNCTION BOX 21A CURB INLET 278 TRENCH DRAIN 27D DOWN SPOUT COUECTOR INITIAL DESIGN DATE PRN 1 PM DES ORW WHITE PINE SENIOR LMNO 34:77 Engineering Associates, Inc. 2277 NEST HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 (651)697-09DD ROSENLLF MN 55113 651 697-0604 ATE D GRADING PLAN 6HEET ND. 5ATEi SOUTH Pf -47A DR)W 1:56 Au 3 OF 8 TOP AVT HYDR4MT ELEY —856,36 N ARK TNH=856.36 Y FL- 533 82 CH PVC 0 4,)X 0 SITE BENCHMARK 11W DEV -EXE Alk PROPOSED SENIOR , ASSISTED LIVING --rri 96,000± S.F. DIP WATERMMN FOUR STORY WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING FIRST FLOOR FFE 851.50 J-K!�,p. BASEMENT FFE 840.50 0 SITE BENCHMARK 11W DEV -EXE r) Alk ONE CPLD"20' , --rri r) EXISTING FOUND IRON SANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE WATERMAIN VALVE ADJACENT LOT UNE ----- - --- - _ SANITARY SEWER LINE FIRE HYDRANT .. ...... . --- ----- STORM SEWER LINE f ------ WATERMMN STORM MANHOLE — - I - - GAS LINE - ----- FIBER OPTIC LINE CATCHBASIN ---------- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF WAY UNE STORM DRAIN —GAS— GAS SERVICE ---- X'SS— SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ----JOE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE —x`W WATER SERVICE — UGE&T — UNDERGROUND ELECTRICS TELEPHONE AND CABLE GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DIP WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL PLASTIC WITH 7.5' MIN. COVER. B. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SCH 40 PVC WITH 6' MIN. COVER C. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MY DISRUPTONS To E.—NG UnUTY SERVICES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. D. ALL ELECTRIC TELEPHONE AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNATED UTILITY COMPMIE-1, E. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT START ON ANY PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHDRTY AND CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE ENDNEEJL F. PRIOi TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF OR CONNECTION TO ANY STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN OR ANY OF THE DRY UTU-11ES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE VERIFY AND CALCULATE ALL POINTS OF ODNNECTONI AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND INFORM CEI ENGINEERING MO THE OWNER/DEVELOPER OF MY CONFLICT OR REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM! THE PLAN. NOTUTCAnDN SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM Of 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DO ENGINEERING AND ITS CLIENTS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO MAXE: SUCH NOTIFICATION. G UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OJT M SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS, ALL WATER UNE FITTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THRUSTO BLOCINC PER TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ALL WATER UNE PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD spEcincAmoNs 0 U11UTY NOTES 2ZA POINT OF CONNECTION - WATER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES) +5 M.1 BEND WITH THRUST BLOCKING (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET) iJX SPRINKLER ENTRY PER ARCH. PLANS (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET) METERED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ENTRY ENTRY PER ARCH. PLAINS 22X INTERIOR WATER METER (PER LOCAL CODES) INTERIOR BACK FLOW PREWNTER (PER LOCAL CODES) 23A PUNT OF CONNECTION - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WITH DROP (PER LOCAL CODES) Z3E SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ENTRY (PER LOCAL CODES) 23JCONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE 24A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PER ELECTRICAL COMPANY REQUIREMENTS) 240 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER 26A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE (PER TELEPHONE COMPANY REOUIREMENTS) 27A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR GAS SERVICE (PER LOCAL GAS COMPANY REQUIREMENTS) 27B GAS SERVICE PER LOCAL GAS COMPANY 27C PROPOSED GAS METER 29A MAINTAIN MIN. 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION 31A LOCATION FOR THIS UTUTY AS SHOWN IS FOR DRAWING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION IN FIELD PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY LINE TO BE CONNECTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GET ENGINEERING ASSOCJATES. INC- IF THE DESIGN AS SHOWN IS NOT ACHIEVABLE - INITIAL DESIGN - PINE SENIOR LMNG Engineering Associates, Inc. 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 (651)617-04I00 RO-ILIMLE- UN 551I3 (651)697-0604 Lr17L ITY PLAN On. ISHEET N,l Alk ONE CPLD"20' 30' 40' SCALE IN FEET EXISTING FOUND IRON SANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE WATERMAIN VALVE ADJACENT LOT UNE ----- - --- - _ SANITARY SEWER LINE FIRE HYDRANT .. ...... . --- ----- STORM SEWER LINE f ------ WATERMMN STORM MANHOLE — - I - - GAS LINE - ----- FIBER OPTIC LINE CATCHBASIN ---------- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF WAY UNE STORM DRAIN —GAS— GAS SERVICE ---- X'SS— SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ----JOE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE —x`W WATER SERVICE — UGE&T — UNDERGROUND ELECTRICS TELEPHONE AND CABLE GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DIP WRAPPED WITH 8 MIL PLASTIC WITH 7.5' MIN. COVER. B. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SCH 40 PVC WITH 6' MIN. COVER C. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MY DISRUPTONS To E.—NG UnUTY SERVICES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. D. ALL ELECTRIC TELEPHONE AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNATED UTILITY COMPMIE-1, E. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT START ON ANY PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHDRTY AND CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE ENDNEEJL F. PRIOi TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF OR CONNECTION TO ANY STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN OR ANY OF THE DRY UTU-11ES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE VERIFY AND CALCULATE ALL POINTS OF ODNNECTONI AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND INFORM CEI ENGINEERING MO THE OWNER/DEVELOPER OF MY CONFLICT OR REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM! THE PLAN. NOTUTCAnDN SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM Of 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DO ENGINEERING AND ITS CLIENTS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO MAXE: SUCH NOTIFICATION. G UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, CALLED OJT M SPECIFIED HEREON OR WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS, ALL WATER UNE FITTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THRUSTO BLOCINC PER TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ALL WATER UNE PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARD spEcincAmoNs 0 U11UTY NOTES 2ZA POINT OF CONNECTION - WATER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES) +5 M.1 BEND WITH THRUST BLOCKING (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET) iJX SPRINKLER ENTRY PER ARCH. PLANS (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET) METERED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ENTRY ENTRY PER ARCH. PLAINS 22X INTERIOR WATER METER (PER LOCAL CODES) INTERIOR BACK FLOW PREWNTER (PER LOCAL CODES) 23A PUNT OF CONNECTION - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WITH DROP (PER LOCAL CODES) Z3E SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ENTRY (PER LOCAL CODES) 23JCONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE 24A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE (PER ELECTRICAL COMPANY REQUIREMENTS) 240 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER 26A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE (PER TELEPHONE COMPANY REOUIREMENTS) 27A PUNT OF CONNECTION FOR GAS SERVICE (PER LOCAL GAS COMPANY REQUIREMENTS) 27B GAS SERVICE PER LOCAL GAS COMPANY 27C PROPOSED GAS METER 29A MAINTAIN MIN. 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION 31A LOCATION FOR THIS UTUTY AS SHOWN IS FOR DRAWING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION IN FIELD PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY LINE TO BE CONNECTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GET ENGINEERING ASSOCJATES. INC- IF THE DESIGN AS SHOWN IS NOT ACHIEVABLE - INITIAL DESIGN - PINE SENIOR LMNG Engineering Associates, Inc. 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 (651)617-04I00 RO-ILIMLE- UN 551I3 (651)697-0604 Lr17L ITY PLAN On. ISHEET N,l BENCHMARK #1� TOP mff hEYD"mw ELEV-&N6.36 ARK TNH=856.36 GENERAL EROSION NOTES A� .4LL- Ilk a im ®® 0 20, 30' 40' SCALE IN FEET EXISTING FOUND IRON SANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE WATERMAN VALVE - ----- - ELLE. ADJACENT LOT LINE ELLE._.-_.. -SANITARY SEWER LINE FIRE HYDRANT - ____ ISTORM --------- -- SEWER UNE WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE GAS LINE CATCHBASIN - ----- ... .... -------- FIBER OPEC LINE ---------- -- - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STREET EIGHT PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE -------- MADE BREAK CONTOUR ELEVATIONS STORM DRAIN 0 EROSION DETAILS CE TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE — 3 — SF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE P6 INLET PROTECTION (PRIM TO PAVING) IP INLET PROTECTION (AFTER PAVING) CWA TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT GENERAL EROSION NOTES CONTD A. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER =CE PROPOSED POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER MU. MEASURES STATED � THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT XNTRU_ SHALI. BE MAINTAINED IN EUI -Ly EUNCTIONAt- �NTUR UNTIL FINAL POLLUTION PREVENT)ON PLAN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NA71CNAL STABILRATIM OF TH STE ALL EROSION MD SEDIMONTATON CONTRIX. SENIOR ME—RES � BE CKED BY A EVAUPELD — AT LEAST OHM POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATIO14 SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS i RAINFALL EVENT. AND SHOULD BE �W AND �MRM IN fl-, EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WTHIN 2+ HOURS OF THE END OF A B. WE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL ALSO BE USED AS ACCORDANCE W THE FIXI-OWN. ASSISTED LIVING THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AREA, EQUIPMENT MEANING AREA, Cis `np. EMPLOYEE BREAK AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES. 96,000±,-S. _'A 10 �CE TRAILERS AND TOILET FACILITIES- THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL I. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REP- OR FOUf,?�15TORY D' THEY — ..S OF ETER(ORAR— v BE COORDINATED MW THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, M SHALL BE REPLACED G ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS� VEHICLE �ANING, EQUIPMENT WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING Z ALL SDUDED/=ED AR— SHALL BE CHECKED R—LARLY TO SEE THAT MEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER R TS MO STORM WATER P E� A GOOD STAND LS MkNTANED- AREAS SHOULD BE FERILTZED AND CONTACT BETWEEN THESE MATERIALS R THAT IS RESOLDED AS IESUED. DISCHARGED FROM WE STE fp FIRST FLOOR FFE 851.50 & SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORQNA_ CONDITIONS IF Aix D. MAINTAIN ON THE STE OR HAVE READILY AVAILABLE SUFFICIENT UL AND DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WE SET FENCES WHEN IT -WIRD TO ONE -HA WE HLIGHT OF WE SILT FENCE. GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTAIRON BOOMS To CONTAIN AND REACHES ONE BASEMENT FFE 840.50 CLEM UP MEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. A WE I—STRUCTON ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A GUNUTON WHICH MM WEVENT TRAMLNG OR FLOW OF MUD ED PUBLIC F DUST ON THE STE SHALL BE CONTROLIE3 BY SPRAYING WATER Y PETRO ON DR A THIS MAY REWIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSOF' WE T AREAS OF THE SITE THE USE OF MOTOR OLS AND OTHER OLEUM ON ENTRANCES AS OUNDITURS DEMAND. B OR TOMC UOUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS " N " PROHIBITED. S WE TEMPORARY PARKING AND SIGNAGE MEA SHALL BE KEPT LN COW CONDITION (SURABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REWIRE F. NO RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE M OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEMAND. PONON C TOP DR— OF WE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONUT04S DISCHARGED INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE- D. e G. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON SEQUENCE OF CCNSITRI1CTgN IPS Ip THIS PLAN, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE - 1. INSTALL STANL.m C411PUCnON O,_N_ Z PREPARE TEMP Y PARIDNG AND STMAGE AEM H_ DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THESITE MME CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL WE SILT FENCES - WE SITE, STOPPED FOR At LEAST 21 DAYS, SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED S. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING PAD AND STERUCNRES J C.. — SIM WTHIN 14 DAYS. SEED DENUDED AR_ 7, INSTALL UMUIEr, UNDENURAINS, STORM SEWERS, IRES All - 1. DISTURBED PORTONS OF WE STE WERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY H.% THESE H AR INSTALL UET PROTECTION DEVICES. PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED. NSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUT -ET STRUCTURES. -SHALL BE SEEDED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE LAST ID. PREPARE STE FOR PAYING. CCHSTRUCPDN ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS. REFER TO THE 11. 1AW TE. LANDSCAPING PLAN. �Z CUMNLETE GRADNG AND INSTALL PER ARENT SEEDING AND P—G. 11 1 — AU- TEMPORARY ER—ON AND SEN.MT CONTROL OVA— (ONLY 11 �WV 4a Brg. =N14 J. IF THE ACTION OF VEHICLES TRAVELING OVER THE GRAVEL SITE S —U—). C CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO REMOVE THE MAJORITY W A=49'J759 OF DIRT GN MUD, THEN WE TRES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE THE VENICLES ENTER A PUBLIC ROAD. IF WASHING IS U. ONS MUS BE MADE TO INTERCEPT ME WASH WATER ANDSEDTRAP THE R=60. 00 SEDIMENT BEFORE IT IS CARRIED OFF THE SITE. THE EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WTH THE OWNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. (D K. ALL MATERIALS SPILLED. DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLESOTO ROADWAYS OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED iifl-, IMMEDIATELY. L CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT IN WE DETENTION POND AFTER WE STABIUZATON Q OF THE SITE AND ALSO ANY SEDIMENT THAT MAY HAVE COLLECTED IN jJ WE STORM SEWER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS� IP6 IP E M. IF SOL STOCKPILING IS EMPLOYED ON THE STE SET FENCES SHALL BE i! !-2:i i SF USED TO HELP CONTAIN WE SEDIMENT. N. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONOI ON DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSIDN_ 850 GE D� ALL TEMPORARY EROSON AND SEDIMENT CU4TRD_ MEASURES SHALL BE t A, DISPOSED OF WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABJLJZA7101,L FINAL S-TAB UZATON HAS OCCURRED WHEN ALL SUL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES 6.42 ARE COMPLETED AND A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A 1? DENSITY OF = OF THE COVER FOR UNPAVED AREAS AND AREAS NOT ONCR --��70. 00 SI COVERED By PERMANENT STRUCTURES HAS BEEN EMPLOYED. WASHOUT DUE TO THE GRADE CHANCES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 5324 ES PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, STRAW BALESETC) TO C_ /1? =A/ HELP PREVENT EROSION AND STORM WATER POLLUTION. < P. ALL OFF-STE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF 0 u EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES BACKFIWNG OF TRENCHES FOR STORM DRAINS & UTILITY CONSTRUCTON AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR -07-111 1 1 1 IP 04 ACL AEC RIS RTS TIAL. DESIGN BITUMINOUS PAYING FOR ROAD CDNSTRUCTDN. N[ ------- DATE I PRN I PM I DES I DR- I ------ ---- .. . ....... ... _ ------ W14M=7 PIMP= QI=A//(-)R I MAI('� SF F � OVTH PLAZA DRIVE . .... ...... . .. itEngineering Associates, Inc. ENUMEERS . PLANNERS . SUWET'QRS L"USCARGNMENTAL SCiENnSIS 2277WEST HIGHWAY 36, SWIE 200 (651)697 -MOD 'ROSE -OER)4 VILLF WN 55113 651 97 DA TE -ROSION CONTROL PLA514111 SHEET N' SOU71"1 PLAZA DME 11:56 AM 5 Cr 8 r DES CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS ORM WATER POIUTION PR VENTION P N ERMITTEE(S) MUST IMPLEMENT THE EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP ANO THE REMENTS GE THIS PART. THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (amps) REDINTHE PUNS AND IN THIS PERMIT MUST BE INSTM ED IN AH PRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES THE PER.,TTEE(p) MUST PUN FOR AND IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE SLOPE CL?NSTRUOTOM . H.ASHG. VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS u�c:Z'_".'T _'. GRApIM ANp OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART W.E. ARE COIMPUED WITH. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (EG WITH FUCS STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT STE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. 2 ALL EXPOSED SOL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF A SURFACE WATER, MUST HAVE TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVEN FOR THE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS YEAR ROUND, ACCORDING M THE FOLLOWING TABLE OF SLOPES AND TME FRAMES TYPE DF SLOPE TIME (MAXIMUM TIME AN AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN THE AREA STEEPER THAN Y1 7 DAYS IS NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED.) 101 TO 3:1 14 DAYS FLATTER THAN 10:1 21 DAYS THESE AREAS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POND SIDE SLOPES, AND ANY E)TDSED SOIL AREAS WITH A POSITIVE SLOPE TO A STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM, SUCH AS A CURB AND (:NITER SYSTEM, STORM SEWER INLET, TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR OTHER NATURAL OR MAN MADE SYSTEMS THAT DISCHARGE TO A SURFACE WATER TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (_ _ CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES SAND STOCKPILES) ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COAIPIY WITH PART IV -05. 3 ADDITIONAL BMP'S TOGETHER WITH ENHANCED RUNOFF CONTROLS ORE REWIRED FOR DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THE BMPS IDENTIFIED FOR EACH SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER ARE REWIRED FOR THOSE AREAS OF THE PROJECT DRAINING TO A DISCHARGE PONT ON THE PROJECT THAT IS WITHIN ONE MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER AND FLOWS TO THAT WATER 4. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH THAT DRAINS WATER FROM A CONSIRUCTON SITE OR O VERTS WATER AROUND A SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE OR FROM THE PUNT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. 5. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WTH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION BEFORE CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 6. WHEN POSSIBLE, ALL SLOPES MUST BE GRADED IN SUCH A FASHION SO THAT TRACKING MARKS MADE FROM HEAVY EQUIPMENT ARE PERPENDICULAR TO TIE SLOPE T ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RESTORED AS DETAILED IN THESE REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE OF PERMANENT RESTORATION SMALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOD. SEED, IMPERVIOUS COVER AND STRUCTURES A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PERMANENT RESTORATION. AREAS IN WHICH THE TOP SUL HAS BEEN PLACED AND FINISH GRADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND OTHER GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY MUST BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY RESTORED AS SET FORTH IN ME FOLLOWNG REQUIREMENTS A MEAS WITH SLOPES THAT ME LESS TUN 3:1 MUST BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE AREA NOT BEING ACTIVELY WORKED. 8. MEAS WIN ER SLOPES THAT ME GREATTHAN 3:1 MUST BE SEEDED AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PLACED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE AREA NOT BEING ACTIVELY WORKED, C ALL SEDED MEAS MUST BE EITHER MULCHED AND DISC ANCHORED. HYDRO -MULCHED , OR COVERED BY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO REDUCE EROSION AND PROTECT THE SEED. TEMPORMY OR PERMANENT MULCH MUST BE DISC ANCHORED AND APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE AND HAVE 90.5 COVERAGE D. IF TIE DISTURBED AREA WILL BE RE-DISNRBED W I NIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD, TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER SMALL BE REWIRED CONSISTING OF M APPROVED SEED RE AND APPLICATION RATE E IF THE DISTURBED AREA WILL NOT BE RE -DISTURBED WITHIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD. PERMANENT VEGATATIVE COVER SHALL BE REWIRED CONSISTING OF M APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND APPLICATION RATE F. ALL MEAS THAT WILL NOT HAVE MAINTENANCE DOVE SUCH AS MOMNG M PMT OF THE FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE PERMANENTLY RESTORED USNG AN APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND APPLICATION RATE- G- ATEG. RESTORATION OF DISTURBED WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE ACCOMPUSHED USING M APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND APPUCATION RATE B. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATON HAS BEEN ACHIEVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. IF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE Y47H MY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES• THEY LL SHABE RESTORED TOSERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. 9. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ADDED AS NECESSARY TO EF F ECTIVELY PROTECT THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE CITY, TIE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PLODS SHALL BE REVISED AS NEEDED BASED ON CURRENT STE CONDITIONS AND TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPUCMLE REQUIREMENTS C, 5MIMENT CONTRIX PRACTICES 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTCES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FINAL STABILIZATION. Z IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED. ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES 3. THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER TAH 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WHIN POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABIUZED. THESE DEVICES MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL STABRUATION IS ACHIEVED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLWD)NG/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 5.TEMPORMY SUL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS ON THE DOWN GRADIENT SIDE OF ME STOCKPILE AND g SHALL NOT BE PLACED AT LEAST TWENTY FIVE (25) FEET FROM MY ROAD. WETLAND. PROTECTED WATER. DRAINAGE CHANNEL OR STORM WATER INLETS STOCKPILE LEFT FOR MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS MUST BE STADIUM WHIN MULCH, VEGETATION, TARPS OR OTHER APPROVED MEMS &VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE PROJECT SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY m APPROVED BMP'S THESE SHALL BE INSTALLED MO MAINTAINED AT THE OTT APPROVED ENTRANCES. INDIVIDUAL LOTS SHALL EACH BE REWIRED TO INSTALL 9 AND MAINTAIN ENTRANCES THROUGHOUT TIE CONSTRUCTION BUILDING UNTIL A 5 PAVED DRIVEWAY IS INSTALLED. r 7 -SEDIMENT THAT HAS WASHED OR TRACKED FROM THE STE BY MOTOR 7J VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED FROM THE PAVED SURFACES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. a BSILT FENCE OF OTHER APPROVED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE o INSTALLED IN ALL AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP. I 9.SLT FENCE OR OTHER APPROVED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE 3 REWIREDALONG ME ENTRE CURB UNE EXCEPT FOR APPROVED OPENINGS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED OR DRAINAGE FLOWS AWAY FROM THE CURB. THIS DEVICE MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED. 10.DUST CONTROL MEASURES, SUCH AS APPLICATION OF WATER MUST BE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY DUE TO WEATHER, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY 11 -FLOWS MGM DIVERSION CHANNELS OR PIPES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) MUST BE ROUTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR APPROPRIATE ENERGY OISSIPATERS TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OUTFLOW OR LITERAL CONVEYORS AND TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT BUILDUP WHFN RIINOFF IT OWC —TNF rrwl,E , NPDES CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS (CONT.) IZA CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE THE USE OF CONCRETE ALL LIQUID AND SOUR WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FADUTY TO INFORM OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES 13.ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED AND MAINTAINED FOR ME DURATION OF ME PRG.FCT UNTIL FINAL STAETUZATON HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS IF CDNSTRUCI) H OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE YATH ANY mnv CONTROL MEASURES, THEY MUST BE RESTORED TO SERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. 14.ADDITONAL SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ADDED AS NECESSARY TO EFFECTIVELY PROTECT THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE CITY. THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE REVISED AS NEEDED BASED ON CURRENT SIE CONDITONS AND TO COMPLY WITH ALL MPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS 1SRESTRICT CLEARING AND GRADING WITHIN 20 FEET OF AN EXISTING WERAND BOUNDARY TO PROVIDE FOR A PROTECTIVE BUFFER STRIP OF NATURAL VEGETATION. O. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAIMMIl 1, DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING [E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATON BASIN ON THE PROSECT STE WHENEVER POSSIBLE IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASH PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMPS. SUCH THAT TME DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE PUNTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SNEETNG OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REWIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOUDS 2 ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES MUST BE DISWARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS EROSION IN RECUNNG CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES ON INUNDATION IN WEILANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. E INSPEIIONS ANO MAINTENANCE I. THE PERMITTEE(S) (EITHER THE OWNER OR OPERATOR, WHOEVER IS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP) MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN (-M) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS ZAlL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTON MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP IN ACCORDANCE WIN PART IIID. RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SHALL INCLUDE ADATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; RNAME OF PERSONS) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; GFINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; O.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); EDATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS AND FODCUMENTATON OF CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP AS REWIRED IN PART III.A4. 3.WHERE PMTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, B'JT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PMTS OF THE SITE, INSPECTIONS OF THE STABILIZED MEAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MUST TAKE PLACE AS SOON M RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 4.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT BMPS SHALL BE INSPECTED TD ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS ALL NUNFUCNTIONAL BMPS SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WIN A FUNCTIONAL BMP. THE PERMITTEE SHALL INVESTIGATE AND COMPLY WITH THE FOLLWNG INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. S.ALL SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUCNTONAL OR THE .SEDIMENT REACHES j OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE THESE REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE WITH 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOCK AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS 6.SURFACE WATERS INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, MUST BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF SEDIMENT BEING DEPOSITED BY EROSION. THE PERMITTEE SHALL REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPORTED IN SURFACE WATERS. INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASNS AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTASIUZE THE MEAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOLS THE REMOVAL AND STABIUZATON SMALL TAKE PUCE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS THE PERMITTEE SHALL USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. If PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND 5TABIUZATION SHALL TME PUCE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYSOF OBTAINING ACCESS THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL REGIONAL SLATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING MY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING MY WORK. 7.CONS EMUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF-STE SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. TRACKED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL OFF-SITE PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR IF APPLICABLE WITHIN A SHORTER TIME &ME PERMITTEES) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SIZE THE PERMITTEE(S) ARE RESPONRBLE UNTIL MOTHER PERMITTEE HAS ASSUMED CONTROL ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5 OVER ALL AREAS O THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY STMIUZED OR THE SEE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABIUZATION, AND A NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA 9 -IF SEDIMENT ESCAPES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OFF-STE ACWMULATONS OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF-STE IMPACTS (EG., FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC SIR=), iO.ALL INFILTRATION AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACnATES IS REACHING THE INFILTRATIONAREA AND THESE AREAS ME PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSERU AREA EQUIPMENT DRIVING ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREA TON F. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANISUM NT M ACI RFS THE PERMITTEES) SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTON PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON ME SITE 1.SOUD WASTE COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATNG DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASEIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOUTON DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WIN MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS ZHAZMDOUS MATERIALS UL GASOUNE PAINT AND MY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILL$ LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDAUSM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WTH MPCA REGULATIONS 3.EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CWSERUCTON VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SIE RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENONE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE 4.THE OTT OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PROHIBITS DISCHARGES OF ANY MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORM WATER, AND DISCHARGES FROM DEWATERING OF BARN DRAINAGE ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED DISCHARGES INCLUDE BUT ME NOT LIMITED TO VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING, MAINTENANCE SPILLS, WASH WATER, AND DISCHARGES OF OIL AN OTHER HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES. NPDES CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS (CONT.) G. ETNAI STABILIZATION 1.THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST ENSURE FINAL STABIUZATION OF THE ?RO,IECT. FINAL STABILIZATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS ZALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL SOILS WILLS BE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VECITAT)W OVER )AM A DENSITY OF AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS OR EITHER EQUIVALENT MEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS AND: MALL DRAINAGE DITCHES, CONSTRUCTED TO DRAIN WATER TRAM THE STE EROSAFTERION; CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE MUST BE STAEIIUZED TO PRECLUDE BALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, AND STRUCTURAL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SMP'S (SUCH AS SILT FENCE) MUST BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE SITE FINAL STABIUZATON; CTHE PERMITTEE MUST CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM WASHING BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES OR DRAINAGE WAYS DISCHARGING OFF-SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS THE CLEW WT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN TINE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. H. TRA1R Its 1.TRAINING IS REQUIRED FOR THOSE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION OF THE STWPPP, MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION STE AND INSPECTIONS ZTHE SWPPP MUST PROVIDE A CHAIN OF COMMAND SHOWING WHO PREPARED THE SWPPP, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION STE AND INSPECTIONS 3.ME TRAINING SHALL CONSIST OF A COURSE DEVELOPED BY A LOCAL- STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY, PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION, WATER m.mT ORGANIZATION, OR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND MUST CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS RELATED TO EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL OR PERMANENT STORMWATER MGMT AND MUST RELATE TO THE WORK THAT YOUR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING. WHITE PINE SENIOR LIVING SITE INTRODUCTION PRO IF T DESCRIPTION THE PROPOSED WHITE PINE SENIOR LIVING SITE IS ZOO ACRES (LOT 6 OF MENDOTA PLAZA PLAT) LOCATED ALONG SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE IN MENDOTA HEIGH"S, MN. PROPOSED IS A }96,000 SF FWR-STORY BUILDING WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING. STORMWATER FROM THIS SITE CURRENTLY DRAINS NORTH TO AN ALRFA]Y CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER BASIN. THIS STE DOES NOT DRAIN TO ANY IMPAIRED ON SPECIAL WATERS. THIS SIF. IS LOCATED IN AN UNMAPPED FIRM AREA ACCORDING TO FEMA PER PREVIOUS REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT, THE PROJECT SITE DOES NOT INCLUDE SITES OF HISTORIC OR ARCHEOLOGICAL RCNIFICMCE AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ENDANGERED k THREATENED SPECIE$ RARE NATURAL COMMUNITIES, COLONIAL WATERBIRD NESTING SITq MIGRATORY WATERFOWL CONCENTRATION S AREASDEER WINTERING AREAS OR WWDUFE CORRIDORWETLANDS EXIST TO THE EISi OF WR LOT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED DELINEATION REPORT. THE IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SWPPP WILL PROVIDE THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER WITH THE FRAMEWORK TO REDUCE SOL ERLL EROSION AND MINIMIZE POUTANTS IN THE STORM WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE SENIOR LIVING ST THE SWPPP WILL DEFINE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE AND THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO OCCUR, INCLUDE A STE PLAN SHOWING THE MNS(RIJCTON; DESCRIBE THE PRACTICES THAT WILL BE USED TO CONTROL EROSIONAND THE REIEASE OF POLLUTANTS IN THE STORM WATER, INDICATE A SCHEDULE TO HELP ENSURE TE THAT 1H PRACTICES INDICATED ME IMPLEMENTED AND TO HE1P EVACUATE THE EFFECTHATVENTHE OF THE PRACTICES IN REDUCING EROSION AND POLLUTANTS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE; AND TO DESCRIBE THE FINAL STMIUZATON MEASURES REWIRED TO HELP MINIMIZE EROSION AND OTHER STORM WATER IMPACTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. aTOR�WAMPO I ON PR l��O�P AN IMP) FI TA�Oh PLM COORDINATION: THE STE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE OWNER, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE FIELD SUPERVISOR FOR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING AND MONITORING THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS WILL INCLUDE OVERSEEING THE MAINTENANCE OF THE BMPS THAT ARE IMPLEMENTED, PROVIDE INSPECTIONS AND MONITTURING OF THE BMPS, IDENTIFY AND CORRECT MY DEFICIENCIES IN THE SWPPP, AND MONITOR THAT ANY CW/ CM TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE ADDRESSED BY THE STORM WATER POLLUIIDI PREVENTION PLM. PROJECT INFORMATION SITE LOCATION: TIE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON LOT 6 OF THE MENDOTA PLAZA PRO_,ECT ALONG SOUTH PLAZA DRIVE IN MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN. PER VICINITY MAP ON ME SWPPP PLM. THE MENDOTA PLAZA IS TO OUR WEST, OPEN LOT NORTH AND EAST, AND RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT QNTROI S TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEA.SUREQ A UST OF STABILIZATION MEASURES HAS BEEN TABULATED BELOW AND TIE LOCATIONS OF THFSE MEASURES ME SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EROSION CONTROL P'.AN. THIS PROJECT WILL USE A NUMBER OF BMPS M HELP CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT. THOSE MEASURES INCLUDE L STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Z SILT FENCE 3. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION 4. CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAILS FOR THESE CM BE FOUND ON THIS SHEET. THE FOLLOW TABLE PROVIDES A SCHEDULE FOR STASIUZING DISTURBED AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION: DISTURBED AREA YroRKING DAYS TO TARII IIF 3 TOI AND STEEPER SLOPES 7 DAYS SLOPES FLATTER THAN 3 TO 1 14 DAYS ALL DITCHES. WITHIN 200' OF OUTLET 1 DAY ALL OUTLETS 1 DAY ALL INLETS 1 DAY TEMP5 MY SEDIMENT BASINS M. TRAPS t DAY SOIL STOCKPILES 7 DAYS SEE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL PLANT AND TURF COVERAGE OF THE SITE CONSTRUCTION IYPE THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A ±96.000 SF FOUR-STORY BUILDING, ALONG W IN E ASSOCIATED UNDERGROUND AND SURFACE PARKING LOT. ROADWAYS, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. DRIVEWAYS. SANITARY SELLER, WATER MAIN AND STORM SEWER UTIUTES ALL OF THE RUNOFF FROM IMPERY�WS SURFACES WILL BE COLLECTED AND ROUTED 70 THE EXISTING STORMWATER BASH NORTH OF WR SITE PREVIWSLY DESIGNED/SIZED TO HANDLE OUR SITE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS ANTICIPATED TO BEGIN IN THE SUMMER OF 2011 WITH COMPLETION OF THE STE IN SPRING 2012 EXISTING DRMNAGE/SUL CONDITIONS TBD SITE WIDE CONTROL MEASURES TO PREVENT ERORON SEDIMENTS ETON LEATINC THE SITE THE FOLLOWING BMPS WILL BE USED: - SILT FENCE TO BE MACHINE OR HAND INSTALLED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF AREAS TO BE CRABED BEFORE GRADING BEGINS ADDITIONAL SLT FENCE SHOULD BE KEPT ON-STE FOR REPAIRS REPLACEMENT OR PROTECTION OF ADDITIONAL AREAS SLT FENCESHALL BE INSPECTED ONCE A WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF MY )i" RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT REMOVAL REWIRED WHEN SEDIMENTS REACH 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE _ SILT FENCE CM BE REMOVED WHEN VIEGLTATON FOR FINAL STMIUZATON HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY ESTABUSHED (7010. - ALL EXPOSED AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER MUST BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTON OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. WHITE PINE SENIOR LIVING SITE INTRODUCTION (CONT.) • AFTER ALL AREAS ARE FINAL GRADED, ME ENTRE STE SHALL BE SEEDED AND FERTIUZED. SLOPES WIN GRADES GREATER THAN 3 TO I. OR WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOWS WILL OCCUR EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS AND FIBER LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED (MAXIMUM SPACING 75 FEET). . MEAS FLOWING INTO THE STORM WATER OwHWYANCCE -xTEM M E STABILIZED THE DAY THE STRUCTURES ARE INSTALLED. CATCH BASIN SEDIMENTSAGSWILL BE INSTALLED THE SAME DAY AND LETT IN PUCE UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED - SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF WHEN X THE CAPACITY IS REACHED. • TOPSOIL STDCKPILES WILL BE STABILIZED WIN TEMPORARY SEE., MULCH AND FER IUZER WITHIN 7 DAYS ENCU THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT CREATED THE STOCKPILE • DUST WILL BE CONTROLLED BY WATER APPLICATION ANO/OR SWEEPING AS NEEDED. VEGETATVE BUFFERS WILL BE MAINTAINED AT THE PERIMETER OF THE SM • GRADING OPERALIDNS SHOULD INCORPORATE HORIZONTAL SLOPE TRACKING WHEN POSSIBLE EO HELP REDUCE EROSION. • CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO START GE CONSTRUCTION. • ALL UQUID AND SCUD WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAD( -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACULTY OR IMPERMEABLE UNER A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER GROUND WATER IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE UNER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE STORM WATER CONTAMINATION: ALL NON -HAZARDOUS WAST: MATERIALS WILL BE COLLECTED AND STORED IN A SECURE LOCATION, PREFERABLY A LOCKABLE METAL DUMPSTER, AT THE END OF EACH DAY. ALL TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHOULD BE DEPOSITED IN THE DUMPSTER AT THE END OF EACH DAY AND WILL BE EMPTIED AS NECESSARY. NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE BURIED ON-SITE A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANY WILL COLLECT ALL SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS GOOD HOUSEKEEPING AND SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES SHOULD BE FOLLOWED TO MINIMIZE STORM WATER CONTAMINATION. THE FOLLOWING BMPS WILL BE USED: - FERTIUZER SHALL NOT BE STORED ON-STE. ALL UNUSED PORTDNS SHALL BE PLACED IN A SEALED BIN AND REMOVED MGM THE STE BY APPLICATOR • ALL VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT USED DN -SITE SHALL BE IN 6000 WORKING ORDER AND REGULARLY INSPECTED FOR LEAKS • PETROFl)M PRODUCTS SHALL BE STORED IN LABELED AND SEALED CONTAINERS • SPILL KITS SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL METING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD ALSO USE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MEASURES ON-SITE • ALL ASPHALT PRODUCTS USED DN STE SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE PAIN THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS - ALL PAINT CONTAINERS AND CURING COMPOUNDS WILL BE KEPT IN TIGHTLY SFAL CONTAINERS AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AFTER USE EXCESS PAINT CANNOT BE DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM WATER SYSTEM. - SPILL CONTAINMENT MATERIALS (SAW DUST, KITTY UTTER OIL ABSORBENT PRODUCTS GLOVES, TRASH LINERS) SHALL BE KEPT M -SITE INCASE OF A SPILL ALL SPIVS SHALL BE CFANED UP IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. • CONCRETE TRUCKS WILL BE ALLOWED TO WASH OUT ONLY IN DESIGNATED AREAS, OR ME NOT ALLOWED ED WASH OUT ON-SITE - ALL WORK AREAS SHOULD BE KEPT GRADED RELATIVELY SMOOTH TO PREVENT CONCENTRATED FLOWS AND THE FORMATION OF RUES AND GULLEYS AND THE COLLECTION OF STORM WATER. • A STUIBIUZED ROI( CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED. • ALL ADJACENT PAVED SURFACES AND SIRE= SHALL BE SWEPT DAILY TO REMOVE ALL DUST AND SEDIMENTS. OPEN-AIR BROOMS WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY IF THE OUST AND SEDIMENTS ME WET. • TRUCKS HAULING SULS TO AND FROM THE DIE SHALL COVER THEIR LOADS M'ni iE°""�gpM m.ER OMm (N Y?�NMRDAvcp Apt MP6014D�Ew/4 TEMPORARY SILT SILT FENCE m EAw PosT tr ns a fASIDmS (� Np,E t) tC D_ -iD✓�� sTAK¢ rm S lmt m O1HEq tWAR AHTM 1HE WOv01� iDICE m FwU REST Alm IN, ®lExiaf m TIC tIm01 r� iFNLE (( A® EYFRY OR") w Icv1NLY t+maa TIgnXN TI'EDFA�aeC vnH FAp1 WNcv£ AT— I- FWx 1Y ^TMS EAaH lE An,oH�A ¢g w ff sE�T�m w, mAnmH FAa onoE >�' suu eE vw.Anvm Arnaa reo Rut£ wHE-HNT LIE KDaR W TRE FAa c u sww. oEVM 6 fm,w.tArzo muwrs w A u�l aT AFw¢ MELS Ref �NouK � Ma��T(. 10INF 6 ME sFI FEN¢ W1Ele/19Pp ABo'.£ aU[E SILT FENCE I`°M X"`~ INLET PRTECTION 4mEXnIE MmFm.IHRR-� `R((��1' �3 TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C 10' MIN.' A A 10' MIN'* srAl¢ <Tm.) 2 LATUS PLAN �iTYO sTACI® B 4iL PLA6TC LENIN � N.T.S 2"xl2" RWM]{ MCW FAME WOW FRAME SEWPF],Y ��'�TTT�L�LWEEEMTTjjjTTD77��I, FASTENED MOUND ENTRE I W I PEMMETBR Wtnr lle0 IUEIIVII aPPp�INc sTAK6S SECTION A -A PUHA, n H-T.S / WHITE PLTXOOD HORSE 3' e" HDWT 1. IEHOTIS THE INTERIOR DW.SM. 2 WMICRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE AT lElsT b FT. FROM ANY STCNM SEWIIi N ET 3' 1 THE CWITEIE WASDUT 541 91ALL WOOD POSITS INSTALLED WITHIN b FT. 6 THE 4"x4"+e' TDMPORARY CLYN4zElE WASHOUT FAQLItt. CONCRETE WASHOUT SIE DETAIL (4t WrvAtl]RT TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT ABOVE GRAD NTS. INIT)AL DESIGN L'�D7-LI ACL• .LLC RES DAIS PRN PM I DES WHiTE PINE SENIOR LMNG Engineering Associates, Inc. I2277 WEST HIGHWAY JS SUITE 200 (651)697-0.900 (ROSpE/M�L[[y MW .55fl.1'�7� ,I / FAX(651)697-0804 E/7Va7O N /LS/DE7ALS 5/4/,1 1 'BEET NO S89 5128 "w � // /z/ JI .>• 7y. // / II 1 77 �� \ / �! I �T fi%r _ _ Q PROPOSED L %' �l -- :�?. --- SENIOR . :: /f ' �=ti::<., ASSISTED LIVING 11. 0.LYI _ _ , . 96,000± S. F. �`� y �3 �a �� - FOUR STORY f�6�"" _ p � j �' %� "W ' '`L,_. 11 WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING �_ . . r±l�i I s F .'.4-' _ 4 , n . FIRST FLOOR FFE - 851.50 �1. if ; �, 4 j y? BASEMENT FFE = 840.50 T �Viy r _ j'.j its, .,�.. ,.^.:5.. 'p, r o .P''- ''. � A'' +oat , .: -, .r` 'z ' ' Y`4T� �� 4 �} ! >. _ 1Y I 31 tF ti4 f �� y�� :I T r ; d R b .;. 3 � . , 9 LL .: /Y C7 Al . �)1 �`� * a , i �� T ) "x-1'1 i j s y _ Al l� 1/ \ �.� ,1Y7. 31 LF a / a 1 C I �- 4 N I_ I -11111Y o+.11 - -- :c O I ilT�\ tr c� �` G 41 + s ``� �_�. g I ( Y it _. i/ j \i I N' _1 , ._.. e . _. .. - Y _ _ ,f - ...... _._. __..... _ .._ _.. _ 3 �' RE 1. R - — X ° -, . �\ I5 --. .. f. ::. ` �`)OUTH PLAZA DRIVE ..__... .......... _.. ,._.__ __.__ _..... ______ .._._ _._.._ ... _ _. _ _ __.__ I 0 <r : 56.42 —R= 70. A=11 5, C. BRG= SORE y�AL - 0 SITE BENCHMARK �Q) `s3, =_T �m :�T-.T,EP�YA I , - pd 4 zMARY ]0.S — 6 - sAfMWE4T przt,PWrt S1 1HH QEV-650..TE Nb bl j ® 7 As�nmu+Az. PINS rw vAer wnras ww Muomas oe q �E Gplr• S 6 fb' 30' 40' N1Y� I. �6 /J:�FIEnZaAtwa �9aC. SCALE IN FEET EXISTING FOUND IRONSANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY UNE -- -- EASEMENT UNE WATERMAJN VALVE - - - _ -- ADJACENT LOT LINE -- - SANITARY SEWER UNE ONE HYDRANT .-- -_ ._ STORM SEWER UNE STORM MANHOLE ror t st[ AaEA z.m A - at e, ss. --- - --. WAIERMAIN __ ux � TmK u+m Ate. --- .. - CAS UNE CATCHBASW -- - - --- FBER OPTIC UNE -- - - -- UNDERGROUND E]ECiRiC STREET LIGHT c PqO _ -- S tR u ea[ .. I��ro m s ntua+c Mrt CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION '° nANr.,os _ mcPr�n L.,mvff — PROPOSED . --- BOUNDARY LINE --— RIGHT OF WAY UNE O TYPICAL PLANTING PATH OUANTITY AND KEY (SEE PLANT LIST) ® e MULCHED AREA 4' TOPSOIL AND SODDED AREA LANDSCAPE DETAILS GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 50A TREE PLANTING (TYP.) A. LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND SITE LIGHTING CONDUITS BEFORE LANDSCAPE 5W SHRUB PLANTING (TIP.) CONSTRUCTION BEGINS B. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF O LANDSCAPE NOTES ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES PRIGS TO ANY PLANTING. 50A 5" POLYETHYLENE EDGING C. ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS DESIGNATED ON THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE SODDED. PLANT UST D. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS AT THE TIME OF PLANTING WITH A TIME RELEASE FERTIUZFE PER MANUFACTURERS SPEGFlED APPLICATION RATES COMMON NAME/ - E SEE GRADING PLAN FOR APPUCATIDN OF TOPSOIL AND MAINTENANCE KEY OTY SIZE W.IMENTS OF SODDED AREAS BOTANICAL NAME w1uel _ �,vt>= zr cu. F. HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE USED AS A FOUR INCH (4') TOP DRESSING . e..,,aa IN ALL PLANT BEDS AND AROUND ALL TREES SINGIE TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE MULCHED TO THE OUTSIDE EDGE - �tiE OF THE SAUCER OR LANDSCAPE ISLAND (SEE PLANTING DETAILS). } rx MATCH EXISTNG ROCK MULCH ON-SITE s eea G- CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM ` ��a y Tru- CAPABLE OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE COVER AGE TO ALL SODDED ^"^ Sbv°"' AND LANDSCAPE AREAS. PROVIDE DESIGN TO ENGINEER FOR A+,b � M..dEo Yddo,M' � uL zs AT-, vtA , REVEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL --- I ,mb• X — CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS (p PI AN e s,xr mreaAx — A wu+a __ rvmRc c_J v[E — -— I surmt pI — - Pmt- l Eit4nvm AT - 4- wry _ a _TT _ u�lrtm _ 9.ullNa TREE_PLAN-1ING TS tL "a-A � me,un ) Ad — _ — o��ct _irPAtbtoof — ^- b �=APeas .A-..A-.�t .wu-nwem �o _ — __ — CtTAA —. — ro ,I— SHRUB PLANTING A ALL SITE AREAS NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS. PARKING LOTS, DRIVEWAYS PATIOS OR SMILAR HARD SURFACE MATERIALS SHALL BE SODDED, EXCEPT THOSE AREA TO BE PRESERVED IN A NATURAL STATE: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT AREAS RESERVED FOR FUTURE BUILDING EXPANSIONS MAY BE SEEDED. B. MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING THE OWNER, TENANT AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPING IN A CONDITION PRESENTING A HEALTHY. NEAT AND ORDERLY APPEARANCE AND FREE FROM REFUSE AND DEBRIS PLANTS AND GROUND COVER WHICH ARE REWIRED BY AN APPROVED SITE OR LANDSCAPE PUN AND WHICH HAVE DIED SHALL BE REPLACED AS SOON AS SEASONAL OR WEATHER CONDITIONS ALLOW. G WHEN SCREENING, LANDSCAPING OR SIMILAR IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTY ME REWIRED BY THIS CHAPTER, A PERFORMANCE BOND SHALL BE SUPPUED BY THE OWNER IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO AT LEAST ONE AND ONE-HALF Cl D TIMES THE VALUE OF SUCH SCREENING LANDSCAPING OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ME BOND WHICH SECURITY SAMSFAC TO G B CONDITIONED UPON TALL THE N, SHALL E REIMBURSEMENT OF ALL EXPENSES INCURRED THE TY FOR ENGINEERING LEGAL OR OTHER FEES IN CONNECTION I MAKING OR TH COMPLETNG SUCH IMPROVEMENTS.E LEGALAL 011Oft OTHER FEES IN CONNECTION WITH MAKING OR COMPLETING SUCH IMPROVEMENTS,BUILDING THE BOND SHALL H LL BE VA PRIOR A THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE VALID FOR A PERIOD IN TIME EQUAL THE FULL CAPING. SEASON AFTER THE DATE OF IN57ALIJ TON OF SH LANDSCAPING. THE LEN MAY ACCEPT A LEITER OF CREDIT, CASH ESCROW OR EQUIVALENT IN LIEU OFA 80N0 IN ER AMOUNT AND UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS AS THE CITY MAY DETERMINE TO JBE E APPROPRIATED THE EVENT TIME PRESCRIBED OF A THE PROTECT IS NOT COMPLETED IN TH TIM COMPLETE ME WO THE GTT CW NP PLETE WITHIN E E P L. THE CITY MAY. AT ITS OPTION. D METS THE WORK REWIRED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE OWNER AND THE SURETY. D. THE CITY MAY ALLOW AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ALL LANDSCAPING IF THE DELAY IS DUE TO CONDITIONS WHICH ARE REASONABLY BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE DEVELOPER. EXTENSIONS WHICH MAY NOT EXCEED NINE (9) MONTHS, MAY BE GRANTED DUE TO SEASONAL OR WEATHER CONDITIONS WHEN AN EXTENSION IS GRANTED. THE CITY SHALL REWIRE SUCH ADDITIONAL SECURITY AS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE INITIAL DESIGN PINE SENIOR LMNG Engineering Associates, Inc. 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36, SATE 206 (651)697-0600 LL& WN 55113 804 RDSENC>SSCAPE PLAN 5/6511697-G GATE J�Fll StOM PLAZA DFiNE 11:56 Au 7 Ta' e 1 _IDOTA HEKWYM 14gNINESOTA PRELIM ,� � , , , ..,,. , _ � 1, � . . .. - __ r7- I I .-,_ , .. ti �_� ,v � 4 9 l /f - `\ / y N B :i O t 1. / f ;, ,s em ti % t ,� . _ r ,. �fs ��' a r -.- �.' . ,:.: -. -: ....: :. �.. .. .J 1j -. - t �, G_d �'. - ' ... ....-. .. .:. : -.... ... 1A y J i las IF .y,d :, w� .EYP- yyy ti i 9 , 1. / - - .JI - 52 LF (I / .✓ 'A !7, r lq BENCHMARK w ,ie ,4�..VV 6'6 �, e� 11'1 f1 j' 1 e i .�, ?4i. -4' l \ �. .. iGl"NlJiffYGw.4NT � �, u . -. J i,l'' , 2,, `�� ARK // �-; , TRH=856.36' // >! i! S89 5128 "w � // /z/ JI .>• 7y. // / II 1 77 �� \ / �! I �T fi%r _ _ Q PROPOSED L %' �l -- :�?. --- SENIOR . :: /f ' �=ti::<., ASSISTED LIVING 11. 0.LYI _ _ , . 96,000± S. F. �`� y �3 �a �� - FOUR STORY f�6�"" _ p � j �' %� "W ' '`L,_. 11 WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING �_ . . r±l�i I s F .'.4-' _ 4 , n . FIRST FLOOR FFE - 851.50 �1. if ; �, 4 j y? BASEMENT FFE = 840.50 T �Viy r _ j'.j its, .,�.. ,.^.:5.. 'p, r o .P''- ''. � A'' +oat , .: -, .r` 'z ' ' Y`4T� �� 4 �} ! >. _ 1Y I 31 tF ti4 f �� y�� :I T r ; d R b .;. 3 � . , 9 LL .: /Y C7 Al . �)1 �`� * a , i �� T ) "x-1'1 i j s y _ Al l� 1/ \ �.� ,1Y7. 31 LF a / a 1 C I �- 4 N I_ I -11111Y o+.11 - -- :c O I ilT�\ tr c� �` G 41 + s ``� �_�. g I ( Y it _. i/ j \i I N' _1 , ._.. e . _. .. - Y _ _ ,f - ...... _._. __..... _ .._ _.. _ 3 �' RE 1. R - — X ° -, . �\ I5 --. .. f. ::. ` �`)OUTH PLAZA DRIVE ..__... .......... _.. ,._.__ __.__ _..... ______ .._._ _._.._ ... _ _. _ _ __.__ I 0 <r : 56.42 —R= 70. A=11 5, C. BRG= SORE y�AL - 0 SITE BENCHMARK �Q) `s3, =_T �m :�T-.T,EP�YA I , - pd 4 zMARY ]0.S — 6 - sAfMWE4T przt,PWrt S1 1HH QEV-650..TE Nb bl j ® 7 As�nmu+Az. PINS rw vAer wnras ww Muomas oe q �E Gplr• S 6 fb' 30' 40' N1Y� I. �6 /J:�FIEnZaAtwa �9aC. SCALE IN FEET EXISTING FOUND IRONSANITARY MANHOLE PROPERTY UNE -- -- EASEMENT UNE WATERMAJN VALVE - - - _ -- ADJACENT LOT LINE -- - SANITARY SEWER UNE ONE HYDRANT .-- -_ ._ STORM SEWER UNE STORM MANHOLE ror t st[ AaEA z.m A - at e, ss. --- - --. WAIERMAIN __ ux � TmK u+m Ate. --- .. - CAS UNE CATCHBASW -- - - --- FBER OPTIC UNE -- - - -- UNDERGROUND E]ECiRiC STREET LIGHT c PqO _ -- S tR u ea[ .. I��ro m s ntua+c Mrt CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION '° nANr.,os _ mcPr�n L.,mvff — PROPOSED . --- BOUNDARY LINE --— RIGHT OF WAY UNE O TYPICAL PLANTING PATH OUANTITY AND KEY (SEE PLANT LIST) ® e MULCHED AREA 4' TOPSOIL AND SODDED AREA LANDSCAPE DETAILS GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 50A TREE PLANTING (TYP.) A. LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND SITE LIGHTING CONDUITS BEFORE LANDSCAPE 5W SHRUB PLANTING (TIP.) CONSTRUCTION BEGINS B. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF O LANDSCAPE NOTES ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES PRIGS TO ANY PLANTING. 50A 5" POLYETHYLENE EDGING C. ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS DESIGNATED ON THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE SODDED. PLANT UST D. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS AT THE TIME OF PLANTING WITH A TIME RELEASE FERTIUZFE PER MANUFACTURERS SPEGFlED APPLICATION RATES COMMON NAME/ - E SEE GRADING PLAN FOR APPUCATIDN OF TOPSOIL AND MAINTENANCE KEY OTY SIZE W.IMENTS OF SODDED AREAS BOTANICAL NAME w1uel _ �,vt>= zr cu. F. HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE USED AS A FOUR INCH (4') TOP DRESSING . e..,,aa IN ALL PLANT BEDS AND AROUND ALL TREES SINGIE TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE MULCHED TO THE OUTSIDE EDGE - �tiE OF THE SAUCER OR LANDSCAPE ISLAND (SEE PLANTING DETAILS). } rx MATCH EXISTNG ROCK MULCH ON-SITE s eea G- CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM ` ��a y Tru- CAPABLE OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE COVER AGE TO ALL SODDED ^"^ Sbv°"' AND LANDSCAPE AREAS. PROVIDE DESIGN TO ENGINEER FOR A+,b � M..dEo Yddo,M' � uL zs AT-, vtA , REVEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALL --- I ,mb• X — CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS (p PI AN e s,xr mreaAx — A wu+a __ rvmRc c_J v[E — -— I surmt pI — - Pmt- l Eit4nvm AT - 4- wry _ a _TT _ u�lrtm _ 9.ullNa TREE_PLAN-1ING TS tL "a-A � me,un ) Ad — _ — o��ct _irPAtbtoof — ^- b �=APeas .A-..A-.�t .wu-nwem �o _ — __ — CtTAA —. — ro ,I— SHRUB PLANTING A ALL SITE AREAS NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS. PARKING LOTS, DRIVEWAYS PATIOS OR SMILAR HARD SURFACE MATERIALS SHALL BE SODDED, EXCEPT THOSE AREA TO BE PRESERVED IN A NATURAL STATE: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT AREAS RESERVED FOR FUTURE BUILDING EXPANSIONS MAY BE SEEDED. B. MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING THE OWNER, TENANT AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPING IN A CONDITION PRESENTING A HEALTHY. NEAT AND ORDERLY APPEARANCE AND FREE FROM REFUSE AND DEBRIS PLANTS AND GROUND COVER WHICH ARE REWIRED BY AN APPROVED SITE OR LANDSCAPE PUN AND WHICH HAVE DIED SHALL BE REPLACED AS SOON AS SEASONAL OR WEATHER CONDITIONS ALLOW. G WHEN SCREENING, LANDSCAPING OR SIMILAR IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTY ME REWIRED BY THIS CHAPTER, A PERFORMANCE BOND SHALL BE SUPPUED BY THE OWNER IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO AT LEAST ONE AND ONE-HALF Cl D TIMES THE VALUE OF SUCH SCREENING LANDSCAPING OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ME BOND WHICH SECURITY SAMSFAC TO G B CONDITIONED UPON TALL THE N, SHALL E REIMBURSEMENT OF ALL EXPENSES INCURRED THE TY FOR ENGINEERING LEGAL OR OTHER FEES IN CONNECTION I MAKING OR TH COMPLETNG SUCH IMPROVEMENTS.E LEGALAL 011Oft OTHER FEES IN CONNECTION WITH MAKING OR COMPLETING SUCH IMPROVEMENTS,BUILDING THE BOND SHALL H LL BE VA PRIOR A THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE VALID FOR A PERIOD IN TIME EQUAL THE FULL CAPING. SEASON AFTER THE DATE OF IN57ALIJ TON OF SH LANDSCAPING. THE LEN MAY ACCEPT A LEITER OF CREDIT, CASH ESCROW OR EQUIVALENT IN LIEU OFA 80N0 IN ER AMOUNT AND UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS AS THE CITY MAY DETERMINE TO JBE E APPROPRIATED THE EVENT TIME PRESCRIBED OF A THE PROTECT IS NOT COMPLETED IN TH TIM COMPLETE ME WO THE GTT CW NP PLETE WITHIN E E P L. THE CITY MAY. AT ITS OPTION. D METS THE WORK REWIRED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE OWNER AND THE SURETY. D. THE CITY MAY ALLOW AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF ALL LANDSCAPING IF THE DELAY IS DUE TO CONDITIONS WHICH ARE REASONABLY BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE DEVELOPER. EXTENSIONS WHICH MAY NOT EXCEED NINE (9) MONTHS, MAY BE GRANTED DUE TO SEASONAL OR WEATHER CONDITIONS WHEN AN EXTENSION IS GRANTED. THE CITY SHALL REWIRE SUCH ADDITIONAL SECURITY AS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE INITIAL DESIGN PINE SENIOR LMNG Engineering Associates, Inc. 2277 WEST HIGHWAY 36, SATE 206 (651)697-0600 LL& WN 55113 804 RDSENC>SSCAPE PLAN 5/6511697-G GATE J�Fll StOM PLAZA DFiNE 11:56 Au 7 Ta' e 1 _IDOTA HEKWYM 14gNINESOTA PRELIM sm<dYl< Downspout PVC P a au 9AIDPtc �I Y . Y n�Y iqu�m Bax�wr� ARa l I 4E R �J asearnw ¢ �� N) VnmmE"°PXS�inmae'�vP�Y i eE R i P c 2) "W w"'`�1Ouvc` vim%`o,r�ixYP"r"�' iiPE.•,x Axr rxusnw wmww� » �o'�'vcnane�P""w°" • Axc q �xsrAu nPa: arAR n' PORo+rx e4+AY� A+o otNw ewnws APPuxrwANr�, DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR NG CURB lit OVERFLOW LS Y cF TfE CURB BOX HFlGMT 0 Elm WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CC -21• HICH FLOW INLET PROrECrION CURB AND CURER MODEL .—c— PLATE OR CRT `-Ra,ED EQUAL a"ERRDW IB .i CF THE atRe sox NDwT OVERFLOW AT ruP OF FlLTDi Ass -BLT aRe FlL1ER P SEMBLT ouuETFR. s" ut-cRADE 1C AT IDYI —T Hlai-FLOW FABRIC FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANCARD CASTING, IN5 AU MMCO ROAD D"N CC -329D Oft CRY APPROVED EQUAL PAVED ROADAOT INLET PROTECTION hTS P Vi 1: ELEVATION JUNCTION BOX 24-x36" slab opening for casting as specified. Dimension from back of curb tocenter of pipe. 4' Dia. MH - 9' in from Back of Curb 5' Din. MH - 3' in from Back of Curb 6' Dia. MH - 3' behind Back of Curb 7' Dia. MH - 9" behind Back of Curb 8' Diu. MH - 15" behind Back of Curs Costing and adjustment rings as specified. 6- prgcast reinforced congete slab. Ear 6 die. manhole, an 6 precast slab is required. Top of barrel section under top lab to have flat top edge sealed with 2 beads of Ramnek or equal. W joints in manhole to have 'O" ring rubber gaskets. 'recast concrete section loghouses shall be grouted on both he outside and inside, lonhole steps, Neenah R1981J or qual, 16' .- a block structures are allowed. 'inimum slob thickness, 6" for 14' epth. Increase thickness 1" for och 4' of depth greater than 14', nd reinforce with 6"%6" 10/10 mesh. out bottom CURB INLET NTS ' <r 9`m"w,w a ru;`rs ,s uv� rA,rm�r 9�Lor,utxNs r Yw PA,ew.r 8 k or,4aTc wl6 ¢v T tf �9«rNx No�,or A � A � YA% A � aAss I� STANDARD DUTY m J ASPHALT PAVING TYPE "A" CONCRETE SPA m NTs CURB AND GUTTER to t.tz AWC AT PLAN v D A � Lttr)trn) JTA vm rs ug scow nx aox�s,P.m P4rnw Ate, N VI W B SECTION OF SIDEWALK mim � ianxatw Bw�n � 9w1�'eE Yew-xF.�iu mxuR-cr-vAT � WHEN BORDERING PAVEMENT rlaYmm s¢ 9rt nAN T r �-' a uAx LT- � num nu o vtH ff soc.wc �) s,nae a u ssss uAx � Y) �a-n (rn) SECTION A—A )� iTM� =-- WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWALK `p""�Y x�°"P== tom) SECTION A -A .ov—,P=SEC.i10N B -e .w s o�rx'�"so�n s uAntau DA�i �c or vAix. (TYPICAL AT EACH DRIVEWAY CURB RETURN) ems„ CONCRETE SIDEWALK D i+o+rrmu.n mm �.T Ass, Doo« � mn,) krs �— mcwNx 9BLwALK —} I _ 5�-I '.•"^:. r"' I "."tea '�� wnw A� w� NOTE4 ILL 9v6 9w.lDiFSEAAL NwrAT AOYeaSmArgNy I I S I Y I 9Z 91E RAN I I 5 Yff "LN6a'al lxAfT% OaaNcl GE .S. (OGL 9SOFFlt wNi 946 N Atlz.TiBAN¢ NEYtnED t wtnl YANIFACnMa15 ws RelCig6 � m�E P "uewT < RTb atw9 gnNw .Aa= /tL 9µw TNKN_ AT YA�NenxiNK �v Owren ,r x Y g wa«a Nr WHEELCHAIR RAMP IN SIDEWAUC v�Axra1 Pm -r Y '? r, < tai% rniu9 >7 4 P rj m+a asimc reP ea" 1A rum or mxT¢rc e' r/oma b tTNnrx1 tnutPicNxt¢ nv y� � �-{ o<��tC Pc 4woatE P..' r tf lvNVRIE _ S � eS '-� : y I I STNmNm rED ANo MnE 9w i' NOTE6: LOCATE AT EDGE OF PARKING sPACE UN= ACCESSIBLE VAN ACCESSIBLE ACCOMPANIED BY -VAN- LETIvaNG SIGN BASE PARKING SIGN "DO NOT ENTER' N.T: SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 9u x.rs 11A N.Ts Pui b Y-ff lliF�A rnAIE rPEn I e TIP. r -s r -s 71' AoA.mrrVA—c12- WIN. {� 4,.aE MtwrH YARVS �46pANiAev�E x,il£rnK B STOP�BAR tm TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW la c oo ol,r, .O ' DIMENSION TARLF A - 2 5- C - 10 - TRENCH DRAIN INITIAL DESIGN Engineering Associates, Inc. 3277 WEST HICHWAY J6, S IIE 200 (65))W-0600 ROSEWLLE AIH SS11J FAX -(651 697-0804 DETAILS DATE 5�4�11 SHET T N, SOUTH �A DME 1:5 AN B or a 4 _ADOTA AWNESOTA PRELIM RAS TER EAI TERRHISES LOT 6, BLOCKY, ak r ME/VOOTA PLAZA EXPA1VS1OIV MENOOTA HE10"TS, M//VNES(DTA rJ 5s 4 tp�1O o.a z. . . i a M ndota Mall / Associated LLP Address Not Assigned 'e /n Mentlofv Height, MN 55118 \ .. t y I —= ` 836.05_ _ < 8366-14 — x 83 6.06_—_—_ 838 _.•� L � / 7 i846.6� 1 `1\ �. \` /�� \ \ 45.41 e A"Yo re``\ gee c h 1 + //'\g,<e�l I t- 41.49 TOWNSHIP NORTH—RANGE, 23 -WEST $9 s $ DAKOTA;COUNTY,MINNESOTA / S '' `\ ^ I I xg4]_26 .P.E �s 850.06 J�E�e.Q" e <s' l Mendota75D HI ghsY llot— LLP: e_. c.,,, ! //�/ / 846.92, S ` 1 I Ix8 Eo$- - 8 .I 14 n66to Hnghte. MN 55118 _ 848.41 I \ ( 41.46 - - Tt, NOTES. �:_. - BENCHMARK-- 3rP x641.39 1. Fee Wimple ewn.rshp Is vested h 4ondoty Mall Axso 101 LLP, ay Minnesota emlted llabnity partnershlp. ,TNH 856.36 i i t"3 /� / /X \\ I , 1,, 1 C m 2 Area of pne i ty Ie 87,290 a¢R or 200 acres - / \ 1 `y �o _ I �. , —, 1 1 � � P�\ a Prro<ny U abntraaL .. Property le zoned MU—PUD (Mlxad Use Planned Upx Doral t under o Il.bl. x1 in - � •t..{^ / � / \ � 1'-` e opmem) PP n g requlotims 848-3 1 t Tj i _. \� 5.. BUNdin9 aetbackn vary pa proposed lot and ¢e negatkted on on M610dual bvnls. 848.87 I I ` �-84z--� \ 6. The Pn P, ty hoe arcass to South PI.- Dries, a dodknted publly street � � 7. The oddr— f the property hon not ba Ignad - fn & Above you d utllltlea hove been field Jowled' ere shorn. NI underground utility —k. wh'dr serve Ne.proparty by attempted f ee field located through the p' of Gopher Stvfe One Coll pa ti ket numea 100540.308. However, same of Me utility compantee {.fled -to field locate underyyrwnd uhlily IecoUrn. Inihoe. w uMltteo shown an trate Qty at Mendota Hdghts and previous records The vurwya makre no guorvnieee Mat M. underyr.und-ukliHfaa. shown wmprine all such uUilttcs d . area, thM t h eeMw ¢ abantlone6 Tie svney.r further does not wamont that the underground uUHt- shown are M Me exact I—Uk inafcolad although he' : dose cern Mat Me Iomted on aoounitel INe from Int—tier .voluble. The suns has n t h koll bested Me under d uITIUa Prta tv a., �y B \ O a Y ¢e y as pass ;)—pr a P Y° Y 9roun ony 849.38 \ ( \ 0. Tree Lim mvaUvn Elgghg eont.et Gopher St.te One Cell for od orsltn I—dtj.n (651 454—GDO . \, vp— "47 rt 844,32 g. Ste a .Ie utlllty (SbeeiR-IIY — Sanitary sewer stubs, Can the 1—tion, Ueetrk and wmmunirntbn Ihee and verNea) lowtbn b pending find' des(gn f ' Lot 6: UNIty Information shown hereon Is frmn; dove mmUened Gopher Stat. One colt Tcket No. 1G0544308.Rdd I-0— and —L-11. pions 1vt 0 Du LLl�iu`S 10. Ste Brnchmark is Top Nut Hydrant MN) on west side of pdto ddi ere ahowo. It. Surtvice IaoNrn wer+ nof�.ccassibie In Me SE & SW patios of the property on dote of aney (snow storage esus). u! ' 654.031 x 849.89 / x 850.39 p ,4y��yYr1 Jti r - '`/.6�� x65288 I•.IrSTr `J� C k .r , u o x 850.58 v ' I �% F'`<.7ct*#.R"`I'S' f= Uj Mendota Mall �s--e d LLP / vK .pq' r r s �•'c.,'' y� 'i 7 1 -...+ Mend to Moll A cl.ted LLP- I ' \ Address ��'aat Assigned / /- / / / `� y"VeA¢ �}✓ yt Iy2 LfS f a) = - Add 's N t A signed -- I \ _ \ Mendota HdFghti, MN 55118�/f\ /Y Mmd.fa Heights MN 55118 r I ;I x852.36\\ \\\ / �J j/ ( \ ( 4 y •.�)' � i' 2'#t N a_ 85270 'SCAj's}ir`1.� ;ti q a -C4+% to (Prerio' s.hedwyd—� ' 851.09 / / /. E•'s h 1 v x f �..'- QST�I \\to be re ved) \\ __ u � 1 0 <, e. _ \✓ r Q � aTi JN4. m CL c --)0� a W NORTH o- so so S�A�LE IN FEET PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - '�C . •,:,z >a L .' : L .....rte_ ':�_ .. .: ns :.::.. -.. , r?i (A p sdiedub A t Commlbn L t ilU f Commercial partnere Tltl , L1L oe agent !or Old Republl Notlond T1Ue InsurencaCompany, Flle No 334,30, dated Ssptamb'a 33, 2010) let 6, Block 1,, Mt7400Th PLAZA IXPAN90N, according M M. recorded plat thereof, Dakoto Cwdty, Minnesota , Together With the benefiln of evsemrnts contained in Deckratlon a( Easements, Cev<no its Conditlona and Realrictione dvleE Decnmba i6, 2009, fled Narrh 2I. 2010, as Doament Na 272049& Dakoto County; Mu;neeota Abshact Roperiy III IRON MONUMENT FOUND O s SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE I = WATERMNN - 9°e a HYDRANT UE - UNOFRCROUND ELECTRIC O — sTCRM SEYhTt MANHOLE -- EO — p18ER OPTIC TELEPHONE OQ� � CATCH BASIN - UG � UNDERGROUND CAS s+ -GATE VALVE # =LIGHT POLE �� BItUMiN0U5 SURFACE - Contour Interval= 1 Ft CONCRETE SURFACE- : BASIS OF BEARINGS F M p rpoe f thi rvay lh t 11 i L t 6 Block i, ME1lDOTA PLAZA EXPAN9GN, d g t M rded plot fh voF, Doknt. County.- k(nnesofa w wmed to bear ND0'14'04'W. CONTACT INFORMATION ONWER: WHITE PINE SENIOR LIVING 120 MAIN STREET, SUITE 205 MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PHONE: 651.281.0265 - FAX: 651.281.0266 ARGHITEGT: RIVER VALLEY ARGHITEGTS, 1.. 13613 GTY. HWY. 5 - 5OUTH JIM FALLS, WI 54148 PHONE: 115.382.4100 - FAX: 115.382.4101 GIVIL GONSULTANT: GEI EN6INEERIN6, ING. 2211 IAE5T HIGHWAY 36, SUITE 200 R05EVILLE, MN 55113 PHONE: 651.611.0800 - FAX: 651.6g1.O8O4 PLUMBING HVAG $ ELEGTRIGAL: DE516N-BUILD BY OTHERS GENERAL GONTRAGTOR: HOEFT BUILDERS, ING. 310 PINNACLE WAY, SUITE 301 EAU CLAIRE, WI 54101 PHONE: 115.833.1161 - FAX: 115.833.1120 WHITS PINE SENIOR LIVING s TFE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RE5PON6IBLE FOR VERIFYING, ALL EXI5TIN5 • CONDITIONS INGLUDIFU LOGATION5 OF EX15TIN6 UfILITIE5 AND EASE�IENT5. . ALL WORK 5HALL BE IN COMPLIAWGE WITH LOCAL, 5TATE AND NATIONAL CODE5 FOR RESPECTIVE TRADES- . DO NOT 56ALE DRAWINGS. . THE CONTRACTOR 5HALL VERIFY ALL DIMEN61ON5. . PROVIDE ILLUMINATED EXIT 1-16HT5 AT ALL EXTERIOR DOOR5 PER PLAN. PROVIDE FIRE EXTIW15FIER5 AT THE LGCATIOh5 5HOWN ON TFE PLAN5. EXIT DOOR5 _k ALL HAVE SUCH FA5TENIN6 OR HARDWARE THAT THEY CAN BE OPENED FROM THE IN51DE BY TURNIN6 A 51N5LE LEVER (U51N5 A CL05FD F15T) WITHOUT THE U5E OF A KEY. PROVIDE ACCF55 FOR THE 1215ABLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERIGANS WITH D15ABILITIE5 ACT. IWAN51 A111.1-2003. E6015 d52.,d A- 13613 :M H n S 5—h RIVERVALLEYH -'"J1y F.11,.154NZ ARCHITECTS,..,. F , t White Pine, Senior Lining TFE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RE5PON51BLE FOR PROVIDING EXPAN5IOWCONTROL JOINT5 IN ALL MATEWAL5, 5Y5TEM5 AND BUILDIN6 GONFIGURATION5 INCWDIN6 CAULKING A5 REQUIRED. JOINT5 SHALL BE PLACED NO MORE THAN 12'OL- BOTH DIRECTIONS IN COW -RETE SLABS, 20' TO 25O.G. FOR MASONRY AALL5 AND 20' TO 30' OL. BOTH DIRELTION5 FOR 6YP5UM 130ARD WALL5, 50FFIT5, CEILIN65, ETC. TFERE 15 5OtlE OVERLAP BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND 5TRXTURAL PLANS. REVIEA COMPLETE PLAN5 FOR ARGHITEGTURAIJSTRUGTURAL WORK. PROVIDE A DE516NATED SPACE ADJACENT TO THE BUILDIN6 FOR THE 5EPARATION,TEMPORARY 5TORA&E AND COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. DRAKW- AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE C01,5IDERED A5 5UPPLEI-MIN6 EACH OTH R WORK SPEGIFIID, WT NOT SHOWN OR SHOPN, BUT NOT SFEGIFIED BE PERFORMED A5 THOUGH MENTIONED IN BOTH 5FEGIFIGAT1Oh5 AND DRAM W55f NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION sri _ w � 1 1 DATE: 9 MAY'li 0 SHEET INDEX AO TITLE SHEET Al LOWER LEVEL 6ARAC-E PLAN A2 Irt FLOOR PLAN A3 2nd FLOOR PLAN A4 3rd FLOOR PLAN A5 4th FLOOR PLAN AG, WE5T AND EA5T ELEVATIONS Al NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVAT10W5 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION sri _ w � 1 1 DATE: 9 MAY'li 0 -A ISM FFZD-ErT 37 PARKING STALLS HORTH 0 V-4" 10'-f5" 21'-4' 5r -ALE, 5/52" = I' -O" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UMMARY OF VNIT5 MAIN FLOOR = 22 9 MAY 'll • .2nd FLOOR = 29 • 3rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR =. 25 TOTAL - 100 A '-, 'j'2 -coil 1203 C[, HVy G - S—l' , PJVP-R VALLEY C.zl.,,. A 64730Jim F�As. Vill 54748 715,7(14.5057 APCHFI-ECTS, 715„337A00 7.-5,70, 215.132.4707 0 V-4" 10'-f5" 21'-4' 5r -ALE, 5/52" = I' -O" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UMMARY OF VNIT5 MAIN FLOOR = 22 9 MAY 'll • .2nd FLOOR = 29 • 3rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR =. 25 TOTAL - 100 A I L DO 16 W2,d A,= 13613 CIX H,v:, S - S-th RIVER VALLEY Corl- M 54,'Yj JlmFans.VA6448 5.1-1 W57 ARCHITFC-FS,;., --5,704.fl D7� L15.302.4707 I L loo ------------------- J i Fo ol F(D—B] I F- ------ -- I I 1st ------------------lst FLOOR F *FDEC�T 22 UNITS NORTH 6%mmmmmmm,J SGALE: 5/32" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UWARY OF UNIT5 • I MAIN FLOOR = 22]9 MAY 'll 2nd FLOOR 2`1 I • 3rd FLOOR 24 4th FLOOR 25 TOTAL 0 T AL - 10 I I --- F ------------------- I 1 I I I 1 2nd FLOOR I I I I PROfCT 29 UNITS I I NORTH I I I I I I I . nc,nerm 12CIS av Hne$ -sa,m RJJYER VALLEY cc a� Wi 54730 Jn Faii=_; km 54748 ARCHITEGTS.tu� 715.704.505? ;1s,:az.4iec F:5.704.E.;75 wu,n nv�nal`e� Fez 715.:30_.4707 .1;. dY :a:m 51-4' 10'-8" 21'-4' imm 5GALE: 5/32" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UMMARY OF UNIT5 SATE: MAIN FLOOR = 22 9 MAY II • 2nd FLOOR = 21 5rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR = 25 • » TOTAL - DO F— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —_ — — — — — - I I 3rd FLOOR MO.ECT 24 UNITS NORTH -j' 51-41 jol-al 21'-4' Aummmmmmmiiil Sr -ALE: 5/32" = I' -o" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UMMARY OF LNIT5 MAIN FLOOR = 22 9 MAY 'll 015�52nd A- '20 is ax Hvj 5-5;-!h . 'IV 154730 RWER VALLEY .l.' -v154730 F I yq W48 1 _�j jjn: 5,704.6057 ARCHITECTS,?— 712A700 r-17-5,704.617-- Frei n5.3a2.4707 51-41 jol-al 21'-4' Aummmmmmmiiil Sr -ALE: 5/32" = I' -o" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5UMMARY OF LNIT5 MAIN FLOOR = 22 9 MAY 'll 2nd FLOOR = 21 3rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR = 25 TOTAL - 100 F— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 4th FLOOR FRO -ECT 25 UNITS NORTH 0 5'-4" 10'-5" 21'-4' 6%?mmwmmaz� Sr -ALE: 5/32" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY OF UNIT5 • MAIN FLOOR = 22 • 2nd FLOOR = 21 5rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR = 25 TOTAL - 100 016852/4 A- 1-61.3 '-'tX HwvS - South RIFER VALLEY c.ti..,. I'vi 54730 . v, r.11, Wi 54748 APcHITI=-CT,s,Z— 715.'-12A700 5 r -a, T15.382 4707 0 5'-4" 10'-5" 21'-4' 6%?mmwmmaz� Sr -ALE: 5/32" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY OF UNIT5 • MAIN FLOOR = 22 • 2nd FLOOR = 21 5rd FLOOR = 24 4th FLOOR = 25 TOTAL - 100 ev om w�imrmn-�imtr�n�mt �c-�imr�n�imr�c-��m� mn�m�n imumn Yvt�iA��—iQi8ot�4iD.e�t��ste �:in��iPe �rs�sriR SIGN ELEVATION ,: - _ O ,., NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ION _GOi68;,'. JAS.=. i',iG 13:.ty Hvv�•j �ovll': RIVFR VALLEY Gvj i'JI'_F4?SG � n e F21is. V:i 54?48 ..715.392A760 ARCWTECTS,luc ?i5.?(l0.FA5? r,x ?ss.�o..c_; r,x?is.saz.4;o? ,: - _ O ,., NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ION --- — — A—L— Ca ;ax, 1,141 �4720 JJmFiU,IV05,744 Rl%tE-R VALLEY 715.382A-013 White Pine ARCHfTECTSt,4c Fax 715.iO,.FO75 FIA 715-382'4,07 Senior Living rom NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2581 plan ners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Home Addition CASE NO: Case No. 11-15; NAC Case 254.04 - 11.15 APPLICANT(S): David Bergh LOCATION: 996 Caren Court ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR, Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request The applicant, David Bergh, is seeking a Critical Area Permit to construct a single story addition to the home located at 996 Caren Court. The addition is proposed to be located in the rear (west) yard of the property and measures 168 square feet (12' x 14') square feet in size. According to the applicant, the addition is intended to provide an expanded sitting/eating area adjacent to the home's kitchen. In conjunction with the home addition, the applicant also wishes to construct a144 square foot (12' x 12') concrete patio. Like the home addition, the patio is proposed to be located in the rear (west) yard of the property. The subject site is zoned R-1, One Family Residential and is located within the Critical Area Overlay District of the Mississippi River corridor. Section 12-3-17 of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that any work conducted within the Mississippi River Corridor requires a "Critical Area Permit". Anal osis Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is guided for low density residential use by the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Thus, the request to construct the home addition request is consistent with this land use category, which provides for single family development upon the subject property. Critical Area Permit. As noted, any work conducted within the Mississippi River corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. Combined, the home addition and concrete patio will add an additional 312 square feet of impervious surface upon the property. While the amount of impervious surface to be added is considered minimal and not expected to negatively impact the site or adjacent properties, potential impacts should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. No change to the existing grades are planned in association with the proposed site construction (the patio will occupy a location that is relatively flat, with a current slope of less than ten percent). The steepest portion of the property is in the northern third of the rear yard, at approximately eighteen percent. No construction is proposed in this area. Construction on slopes of less than twelve percent is permitted by the Critical Area Ordinance. According to the applicant, excess soil which is left over after excavation activities is to be spread in the rear yard and leveled as necessary. Pending City Engineer comment regarding impervious surface coverage impacts, the proposed addition and patio should not have a negative impact on the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. Setbacks. As shown on the submitted site plan, the proposed addition is to be "centered" on the rear of the home. The addition is to be set back approximately 80 feet from the west property line. Such setback is well within the minimum 30 foot rear yard setback imposed in the applicable R-1 and Critical Area Overly Districts. Moreover, there are no bluff impacts for this parcel. The closest portion of the bluff (continuous slopes of more than forty percent) would be off-site, more than 200 feet to the north of the building site. As such, there are no bluff setback requirements that impact this request. Vegetation. The home addition will overlay an area currently occupied by a rear yard patio. Thus, the home addition will not result in the loss of existing on-site vegetation. Finish Materials. In review of the submitted building elevations, the home addition is to be finished in horizontal siding which will match the existing structure. Shingles, facia/soffits and gutters/downspouts will likewise match the existing structure. 2 As a condition of permit approval, the addition should match the existing structure in color. Action Requested After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: A. Approval of the Critical Area Permit to allow the proposed home addition and patio, based on the following findings: the project shall not involve landscaping, paving, changing in grades, soil loss, or altering of slopes; therefore, it shall not jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area, subject to the following conditions: The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation regarding impervious surface area and drainage impacts. 2. The proposed home addition match the existing home in design and color. -OR- B. Denial of the Critical Area Permit to allow the home addition and patio, based on the finding that the project will negatively impact the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area. Staff Recommendation Considering that no landscaping, soil loss, grade or slope alteration is planned, the proposed home addition and patio should not have a negative impact upon the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. As a result, Planning Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit. Supplementary Materials 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Draft Findings for Denial 3. Application materials �j Draft Findings for Approval Home Addition and Patio in the Critical Area 996 Caren Court The proposed home addition (and patio) will have little or no visual impact on the critical area or surrounding property. 2. The proposed home addition will create no grading or erosion issues. 3. The proposed home addition will have minimal impact on the land as it does not involve landscaping, paving, grade changes, soil loss, or altering of slopes. 4. The proposed addition and patio are located on the subject property in a way that meets the eligibility requirements for slopes and setbacks. M Draft Findings for Denial Home Addition in the Critical Area 996 Caren Court The proposed home addition will have a negative visual impact on the critical area and neighboring property. 2. The proposed home addition (and patio) has the potential to create grading and erosion issues. 3. The proposed home addition has the potential for having a substantial impact on the land as it may cause grade changes, soil loss, or the altering of slopes. N7 CIRCcxf F-4 e - , i�doa H - e I q �, h is APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Date of Application Fee Paid Applicant Name: be w� L�&_A_ L)'[ j 6- PH5 12 -} (Las (First) (M) Address: ecl( Cca-Y,e C (Number & Street) E -Mail Address: 9ey �Aov',� s LtVn6,a Y -h MP -1 SS l I (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: ICAC azr 6-C® _Y _ V� 1 ot ----- (Las (First) Address: _ C&kve (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: Ce�-ef-'r\ (®\.-, ( _ Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request: _Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property 7=� Present Use Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit _Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. further authorize City Officials and agents to inspec e abovepro erty during daylight hours. (Signature of A rit) Date Received (Sig June 3, 2011 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission Re: Letter of Intent for 996 Caren Court Addition Planning Commission, Berghomes LLC has proposed to construct a 12' by 14' single story addition with a crawl space off the back of the Bergh residence located at 996 Caren Court. The primary function is to add a sitting/eating area to the kitchen which currently is very small. All siding, roofing, windows, and paint will match existing. In addition, we will add an approximately 12' x 12' stamped concrete patio off the back of the home serving as an outdoor eating/relaxing area. Excavation will be a minimum. Any and all dirt will be spread and leveled in the back of the property if necessary. All exposed dirt will have new sod laid preventing erosion. Thank you for your consideration. David Bergh Berghhomes 1361 Interlachen Drive Eagan, MN 55123 996 Caren Court May 23, 2011 ... ....... City of Mendota 0 40 Heights SCALE IN FEET A 992 ....... ............... J A 992 ....... ............... Id' -6 ' I_ i' -I%' ,- 2'-r,%' "1 Y-5 ' 2'-5W I" 12'-F,/,' I'-1➢➢' I NOOK \ lO1 2X10 RAFTERS, D O.C. 4/124/12 PITCH. T, Qsf I (� n 5 I�( 1 I I I 1"L41N LEVEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN IGEN' NOTES O SEAL JOINT BETWEEN NEW 4 EXISTING, USE NON -SHRINK GROUT AS REQUIRED. DOWEL 03 X 1'-6' s 16' O.G. DRILL E GROUT 5' INTO EXI5TING. O TYPICAL FOUNDATION WALL: 8X20 CONCRETE FOOTING W/ 2 04 CONTINUOUS. 12' CMU FOUNDATION WALL. O RELOCATE HOSE BIBB, VERIFY LOCATION W/ OWNER ® ACCESS PANEL m EXISTING WINDOW LOCATION. VFY. 517E REQUIREMENT. 5O ENGINEERED FLUSH BEAM, O6 EXISTING- KITCHEN TO REMAIN. O PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL BEHIND EXISTING, CABINET. OS CORNER CABINET, 2'-6' X 3'-611. O9 EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THI5 AREA VERIFY AND RELOCATE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. ® NEW WOOD FLOOR TO MATCH EXISTING. FOIUE R 4 LIGHTING LEGEND Oc CEILING/ SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (,% RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE LO WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. w VERIFY MOUNTING HEIGHT. Z CEILING FAN W/ LIGHT KIT 0 DUPLEX OUTLET Ike WEATHER PROOF OUTLET I TYPICAL LIGHT SWITCH DIMMER 5WITGH A ALL DEMOLITION WORK IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL FFROVIDE ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION AS REQUIRED FOR NEW COvSTFZUCTION SPOULN O`I THE FLOOR PLANS,_ G IF TEMPORARY 5HOR.?,t- OR IS REQUIRED IT ML155T BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO REMOV.INr. ANYTHING STRUJCTURAL TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF BUILDING. D. ALL UTILITIES SERVING THE EXISTING RESIDENCE ARE TO BE MAINTAINED IN WOF2KING ORDER DURING DEMOLITION. E. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION VERIFY THOSE ITEMS TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED, OR ITEMS TO BE TURNED OVER TO OWNER DEiIOLITION KE't' NOTES REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION IN ITS OENTIRETY AS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MASONRY, STONE, PLASTER OR DRYWALL, WOOD STUDS, SHEATHING, INSULATION, ELECTRICAL, AND THE LIKE. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW IN ITS ENTIRETY AS REQUIRED FOR ONEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WINDOW 5A5H AND FRAME, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR TRIM, AND THE LIKE. OFaEMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR STEPS IN THEIR ENTIRETY. REMOVE EXISTING DOOR IN ITS ENTIRETY AS REQUIRED FOR ONEW CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE DOOR FRAME, CASINGS, THRESHOLD, HARDWARE, AND THE LIKE. SAVE DOORS AND HARDWARE FOR P0581BLE REUSE, 3 I REM 5 O REQUIRED BIBS AS RED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION- l 5 O ® REMOVE EX15TING POSTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY. g - _ �\/ O I\✓ OREMOVE EXISTING ROOF IN IT'S ENTIRETY INCLUDING BUT 1 L I NOT LIMITED TO FINISHED ROOFING, UNDERLAYMENT, FRAMING, INSULATION, ELECTRICAL, AND THE LIKE. O EXISTING GNEW ELECTRICAL METERCONSTO BE LOCATEDAS REQUIRED CTION- REMOVE EXISTING PATIO AS REQUIRED FOR NEW TRUE CONSCTION. NORTH �� 1,rLNPLA PLAN NORTH I CONSTRUCTION 5rTIE30LS NEW WALL \ NEW DOOR EXISTING WALL EXISTING DOOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES I_ THIS PLAN AND ITS DETAILS HAVE BEEN DRAWN AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE. THE OWNER ANP/ OR CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL PLANS AND VERIFY ALL INFORMATION PRIOR TO ONSET OF CONSTRUCTION" DUE TO P05515LE CONFLIGTING CIRCUMSTANCES ON THE JOB 517E ANDERSON DESIGN, INC. TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY ONCE BUILDING HAS STARTED" 2. DUE TO THE LACK OF CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES USED, BUILDING MATERIALS AVAILABLE, OR THE CONDITION OF THE BUILDIN(-- SITE ITSELF, ANDERSON DESIGN, INC. TAKES NO RE5PON5181LITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING- OF THI5 BUILDING. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CALL FOR CLARIFICATIONS. 4. AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PREMISES FREE FROM WASTE MATERIALS AND RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE Wbi;Rt-' 5- CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. 6. INSTALL BLOCKING AS REQUIRED IN ALL PARTITIONS TO RECEIVE COUNTERS, SHELVING, ETC. -7. ALL OPENINGS TO EXTERIOR MUST BE CAULKED AND FLASHED. FLASHING IS REQUIRED WHERE ALL ROOF AND VERTICAL SURFACES MEET, OR WHERE SIDING MATERIAL CHANGES. ' 6. LEGIBLE SET OF MANUFACTURE, -R5 ENGINEERED TRUSS DETAILS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE BY PERMIT. '3. PROVIDE SOLID BEARING 14'-6' UNDER ALL BEA415, HEADERS, AND GIRDERS TO THE 5'-"1y;' 2'-5-V 1'-1W FOUNDATION. 22.5_` _ _ _ 10. SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH LEVEL 4 2 EACH BEDROOM. Il. ALL LUMBER THAT IS IN CONTACT in / 2 \ ;, \ _ `n WITH CONCRETE OR CMU TO BE _ _ - PRES5URE TREATED. \ 12. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS, OR NEW I 135.0° I DIMENSIONS BASED ON EXISTING I I "• ARE LISTED WITH 'P. CONTRACTOR I I I I B TO VERIFY IN FIELD. 13. ALL 1345E MOULDING AND - I I O - I . _•- I - WI1NDcLU/ DOOR CASINGS TO MATCH EXISTING. m I I 4L e I 2 ..,. I 2' CONC. SLAB OVER 2' RIGS D I INSULATION_ Revisons Project Number: 11-107 Drawn by: Checked by: Date: 4/10/11 Scale: Sheet Number An �qd1w Al ',moaiCID Iz LO _ _ _ _ _ Z — — — .— _ _ _ _ _ _ I la r��/� �o I I Revisons Project Number: 11-107 Drawn by: Checked by: Date: 4/10/11 Scale: Sheet Number An �qd1w Al ',moaiCID LO Z E Z � cov! � � r��/� �o 0. Revisons Project Number: 11-107 Drawn by: Checked by: Date: 4/10/11 Scale: Sheet Number An �qd1w Al 12ASPHALT SNITCHES ITO S Marco EXISTING. SOFFIT d FACIA TO t.MATCH EXISTING. CUTTERS t DOU,15POUTS TO MATCH EXISTING. mini �� _� � ■ �1� X11 ! �, � ti - 14 0��I� SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING. 12'-0' ADDITION 2 XTERIOR ELEVATION - S(DE 1/2, = I,-0' 12 ASPHALT 4L-- ........... SHWN LES TO MATCH EXISTING. SOFFIT d FACIA TO MATCH EXISTING_ CUTTERS t DOWNSPOUTS TO v ..__.._._.. MATCH EXISTING_ \ 1 i i \ l.J / "�--- SIDING TO MATCH / - EXISTING. CURVED STONE STEPS. 12'-0' ADDITION EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SIDE CONSTRUCTION NOTES I. THIS PLAN AND ITS DETAILS HAVE BEEN DRAWN AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE. THE OWNER AND/ OR CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL PLANS AND VERIFY ALL INFORMATION PRIOR TO ONSET OF CON5TR.ICTION. DUE TO POSSIBLE CONFLICTING CIRCUMSTANCES ON THE JOB SITE ANDERSON DESIGN, INC. TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY ONCE BUILDING HAS STARTED. 2. DUE TO THE LACK OF CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES USED, BUILDING MATERIALS AVAILABLE, OR THE CONDITION OF THE BUILDING SITE ITSELF, ANDERSON DESIGN, INC. TAKES NO RE5PONSiBiLITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OF THIS BUiLDING. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CALL FOR CLARIFICATIONS_ 4. AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PREMISES FREE FROM WASTE MATERIALS AND RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE WORK. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VI51T THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. 7. INSTALL BLOCKING AS REQUIRED IN ALL PARTITIONS TO RECEIVE COUNTERS, SFIELVING, ETC. 5. ALL OPENINGS TO EXTERIOR MUST BE CAULKED AND FLASHED, FLASHING IS REQUIRED WHERE ALL ROOF AND VERTICAL SURFACES MEET, OR WHERE SIDING MATERIAL CHANGES, S- LEGIBLE SET OF MANUFACTURERS ENGINEERED TRUSS DETAILS TO BE POSTED ON JOB SITE BY PERMIT. 10. PROVIDE SOLID BEARING UNDER ALL BEAMS, HEADERS, AND GIRDERS TO THE FOUNDATION - 11. SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE PROVIDED AT EACH LEVEL t EACH BEDROOM_ 12. ALL LUMBER THAT 15 IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR CMU TO BE PRESSURE TREATED, 13. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS, OR NEW DIMENSIONS BASED ON EXISTING ARE LISTED WITH 't'. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN FIELD. 14. ALL B45E MOULDING AND WINDOW/ DOOR CASINGS TO MATCH EXISTING. i�EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SACK EXISTING GUTTERS. RELOCATE EXISTING DOWNSPOUT AS REQUIRED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING SIDING. Revisons ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING_ SOFFIT d FACIA TO MATCH EXISTING. CUTTERS t DOWNSPOUTS TO MATCH EXISTING_ SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING, RELOCATE EXISTING ELECTRIC METER AS REQUIRED. CURVED STONE STEPS, Project Number. 11-107 Drawn by: Checked by: Date: 4/10/11 Scale: Sheet Number A-201 a: .pr 00 � L C) 63 L0 Z m ICU Z U v/U n O a` Revisons ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING_ SOFFIT d FACIA TO MATCH EXISTING. CUTTERS t DOWNSPOUTS TO MATCH EXISTING_ SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING, RELOCATE EXISTING ELECTRIC METER AS REQUIRED. CURVED STONE STEPS, Project Number. 11-107 Drawn by: Checked by: Date: 4/10/11 Scale: Sheet Number A-201 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: /63.231.2555 Facsimile: 63.23 1.2561 piartrtersl��nacpla,-,n,.-,gco^: MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Wetlands Permit for Construction of Fence CASE NO: Case No. 11-16; NAC Case 254.04 - 11.13 APPLICANT(S): Michael Waldman LOCATION: 580 Watersedge Terrace ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: Mr. Michael Waldman is seeking approval of a Wetlands Permit to allow the construction of a fence within the rear yard of his property located at 580 Watersedge Terrace. The fence is proposed to be located within the 100 buffer area of an adjacent wetland (pond). The wetland lies primarily within the adjacent Hagstrom King Park but does encroach into the rear yard of the subject site. The fence is to be constructed of wood ("board on board" style) and measure 6 feet in height. At its closest point, the fence would lie 60 feet from the edge of the wetland resulting in a 40 foot encroachment into the 100 foot wetland buffer area. AnalVsis: The purpose of the Wetland Ordinance is to protect the City's water resources from projects that will have a negative impact on the quality of the wetland. As indicated, the applicant wishes to construct a 6 foot high privacy fence in the rear y.,r.J . f his r,r�r� r+w Ar nrrvimotoly do feet of the fence would encroach Ilton the 100 ard yr rrio Nr%JV ILy. "VVIviniruts. Y -r-- foot wetland buffer area. The applicant has indicated that wetland grasses currently exist between the proposed fence line and the wetland and that such area will remain "untouched". A consistent City objective in consideration of similar Wetlands Permit requests has been that areas along wetland boundaries be retained (or modified to be) in a natural vegetative state. It is the applicant's intent to continue to allow natural vegetative growth the area between the fence line and the wetland. Such intention is considered consistent with City's wetland buffer objectives. Should the applicant, at some future point, choose to add plantings within the natural area, an assurance should be made that such plants are suitable to the provided planting environment. Action Requested: The Planning Commission may make one of the following recommendations: A. Approval the Wetlands Permit with conditions, based on a finding that the proposal generally meets the intent of the Wetlands Ordinance, but requires certain conditions to ensure consistency. Conditions may include: The area between the fence line and the wetland remain in a natural vegetative state. 2. The SWCD finds the proposal to be acceptable. B. Denial of the Wetlands Permit, based on a finding that encroachment into the Wetland buffer zone will have a negative impact on the water resource. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the Wetlands Permit, with condition that the area between the fence line and the wetland remain in a natural vegetative state. Supplementary Materials; 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Application Materials 2 Draft Findings of Fact for Approval Wetlands Permit 580 Watersedge Terrace The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Wetlands Permit: The project meets the intent of the Wetlands Ordinance. 2. The project has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, subject to the above-mentioned conditions. 3. All construction activity will be at least 40 feet from the wetland, and no part of the wetland itself will be disturbed. 4. The area between the fenced in pool area and the wetland will be maintained in its natural state with additional native vegetation to serve as a buffer. 3 City of Mendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. 2-ot .� Date of Application Fee Paid Applicant Name: IA kpM&A i r_gAeu fl PH: 6 � I - 2 -7 y 26 (Last) (First) (M) E -Mail Address: Address: �90 GJ,16ws >�, 'fie �lE�► �ci�o-g�t '��12p (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: VV41-w"'9A WIC1140L-H (Last) (First) (M) Address: S-90 TZC 040'j Bila ,&Hrs W -A-1 Z� (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: 0 L -) -ms's 0,06,6 1 i2C Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. ( ignature of ppplliccant Date Received r G��✓ (Siggature of Oyuner) 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN 55118 • (651) 452-1850 • FAX (651) 452-8940 www. mend ota-heights.com Letter of Intent To Whom it May Concern: This letter is states our intent to build a privacy fence on the property owned by Michael and Erin Waldman at: 580 Watersedge Terrace, Mendota Heights, MN, 55120. This fence will be constructed of wood materials with manicured grass on the inside of the fence and the existing trees, shrubs, and pond grasses outside the fence. The fence will have no impact on the wetlands on the property as it will be set back from the pond and we intend to leave all wetland grasses untouched. Construction will follow all applicable codes related to height, set backs, and property lines. Respectfully Submitted by: Michael and Erin Waldman Jake Sedfacek I- N .. om: michael waldman <the_waldman@ otmai .cont - Sent: Monday, June 06, 20112:45 PM To: Jake Sedlacek Subject: RE: Site Plan Request Hi Jake - this is the style of fence we are plannin g to build ... I believe 6 foot is the standard and maximum height please let me know if we need anythign else. Michael Waldman From: jakes@mendota-heights.com To: the_waldman@hotmail.com Subject: FW: Site Plan Request Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:41:23 +0000 Michael -- I apologize that I was not able to get this to you sooner. Please let me know what further questions you may have about the planning process. Jake. Jake Sedlacek Asst. to the City Administrator City of Mendota Heights www.mendota-heights.corn Th;c communication may contain confidential and/or otherwise proprietary material and is thus for use only by the irded recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments. WN L From: jakes@mendota-heights.com To: the_waldman@hotmail.com Subject: FW: Site Plan Request Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:41:23 +0000 Michael -- I apologize that I was not able to get this to you sooner. Please let me know what further questions you may have about the planning process. Jake. Jake Sedlacek Asst. to the City Administrator City of Mendota Heights www.mendota-heights.corn Th;c communication may contain confidential and/or otherwise proprietary material and is thus for use only by the irded recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments. 580 Watersedge Terrace February 24, 2011 h1 �= y k c1 tk - d.a �f City of Mendota 1-Hoinhfc 1�Jy„L%-; NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 elephone: 952.595.9636 Facsirrnile: 952.595.9837 pial ri ers,' a±f ann.nZJ MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen W. Grittman DATE: June 24, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Construction of New Single Family Home CASE NO: Case No. 2011-17; NAC Case 254.04 — 11.20 APPLICANT(S): Michael Cormick LOCATION: 1175 Sibley Memorial Highway ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: The applicants are seeing a Critical Area Permit to remove an existing single family home, and replace it will a new home, attached garage, associated sidewalks, patio, landscaping, and a shed. As a part of the project, the applicants would improve a driveway that will provide better access to the garage location, avoiding an area of steeper slopes. Because the property is located within the Mississippi River Critical Area, a Critical Area ermit is required for all of the improvements proposed. At 1,440 square feet, the new home will be slightly larger than the existing structure, and will add the garage of 672 square feet as well. The design of the home will be a "look -out" design, with a full level at the main grade, a basement level that "looks out" toward the front (meaning about half of the basement level will be below grade), and will also include a half story above the main hnw,=1 of the hnwise as well. Analysis: In the critical area, new construction and other land disturbance is required to comply with the terms of the Critical Area Ordinance, and includes the following standards applying to this application: • Maximum building height of 25 feet (as measured from average front grade to average roof height). • No construction on slopes of greater than 18%. • No construction within 40 feet of the top of the bluff (defined as land that exceeds 40% slope). • Use of natural, or natural -looking, materials wherever practical. • Minimize visual impacts of the construction from view of the river. The proposed home is measured by the applicants at just over 23 feet in height. There are some discrepancies in this measurement, since there is a gable end which is measured higher. However, the baseline grade is also higher than the applicants have used. Staff's estimate of building height, applying the City's definitions, measure the height as just over 24 feet. In either case, the building height is consistent with the applicable zoning regulations. In this case, the proposed home will be located on an area of the lot that shows slopes of approximately 6-8 percent. The driveway grade (on the west side of the lot) will be as much as 8% at its steepest point (current driveway access grades exceed 15% in some places). The buildable area on this parcel is at the based on the bluff. There is no encroachment on the top of the bluff, and as such, should not impact erosion in that area. The applicants proposed to use vinyl shake siding, a durable material design to simulate the look of natural wood, as well as cultured stone at the base. Both of these materials are consistent with the intent of the Critical Area Ordinance Finally, the site itself is visible from Sibley Memorial Highway, although it is obscured by existing vegetation, most of which is to remain on the property. Due to the elevation of the building site, it is not visible from the river itself, and as such, does not raise issues for impacts on the river. Action Requested: Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: A. Approval of the Critical Area Permit for 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway, based on the draft findings attached to this report. With this recommendation, staff would suggest the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance Document 2. Any further recommendations of the City Engineer regarding grading, erosion and stormwater control. B. Denial of the Critical Area Permit, based on a finding that alterations to the property raise concerns over consistency with the Critical Area Ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit as proposed, with the conditions cited above. The proposal makes use of the property consistent with the R-1 zoning regulations, and utilizes the property with the least impact on the vulnerable parts of the property, such as the steeper areas to the rear. Relocation of the driveway will also provide better access to the property, again reducing impacts on the land. Supplementary Materials: 1. Application Materials dated June 3, 2011 Draft Findings of Fact for Approval Critical Area Permit 1176 Sibley Memorial Highway Maximum building height of 25 feet (as measured from average front grade to average roof height) is met by the proposal 2. No construction will occur on slopes of greater than 18%. 3. No construction will occur within 40 feet of the top of the bluff (defined as land that exceeds 40% slope). 4. Use of natural, or natural -looking, materials wherever practical. 5. There are no visual impacts of the construction from view of the river. I - Y Mendota, Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: CD YWCAL (Last) Address:�lZ� S 5 �f (Number & Street) Owner Name: (20 Y" (Last) Address: E (Number & S G et) C (First) Case. No.a I Date of Application _ Fee Paid L' P H - / (City) (First) t (First) E -Mail Address: r. /V• (�. ft �Ic4 OV�V Street Location of Property in Question (City) X171 s,b( (State) (M) (zip) (State) (Zip) Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) _PIN_ _j�7L3 570®00 a 70 — f q r ----------- Type of Request: _—Rezoning ______Conditional Use Permit __Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. __Preliminary/Final Plat Approval —Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Variance _ Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit _Critical Area Permit _Other (attach explanation) Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. 1 further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during dpylrg t hours. ei�gnature of .pplicant. Cate Received _�.,, �6� (Signature of Owner) 1101 Vic tolria* carve ° Mendota Heights, FTI 55118 ® (65 1) 452-1850 o MX (651) 452-8940 Letter of Intent Critical Area Permit June 2, 2011 Michael Cornick 117.6 Sibley Memorial Hwy I submit this letter of intent for Critical Area Permit with the intent to improve the property located at 1176 Sibley Memorial Hwy located in the city of Mendota Heights. Improvements include replace existing house and foundation with new construction, one -and -a -half story single family home. The exterior will have a combination of vinyl rough shakes, vinyl horizontal siding, and cultured stone. Relocation of the current drive way, replacing with a concrete and asphalt shared drive way. Improvement to existing storm water drainage, installing necessary culvert with landscaping as required using native plants, shrubs and trees. This proposed construction plan will be occur in two phases. Phase one will include the relocation of the current driveway with landscaping for the storm water culvert installation. Phase two would include removal of existing home followed by construction of proposed single family home. See attached proposed home and landscaping plans. Thank you for your consideration of this letter of intent and application for the Critical Area Permit. Sincerely, Michael Cornick 13956 Eagle Street N.W. Andover, MN 55304 1 � � } [ � .. ' � 1 � ; �. ( � 1, f 4�1 m MIKE 4 MARY CORNICK lllro SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY 48 X 30 HOUSE (1,440 SQ FT) W1 28 x 2d nA@AezE E -Age� r' f, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 telephone: 63.231.2555 Facsimile: 76.3.23 1.2581 Nianriers@i,acpiaiiiing.c.^+m MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Bob Kirmis / Stephen Grittman DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for a Front Yard Setback Encroachment (Porch Addition) CASE NO: Case No. 11-18; NAC Case 254.04 - 11.16 APPLICANT(S): John Driscoll LOCATION: 21 Dorset Road ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: Low Density Residential Backqround and Description of Request: The applicant is seeking approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a covered porch (entryway) upon his property located at 21 Dorset Road. Such covered is proposed to extend five feet into the required 30 foot setback along Staples Avenue. According to the Zoning Ordinance, covered and/or enclosed entryways (porches, decks, stoops, or similar structures) that extend into the front yard setback require the approval of a conditional use permit. The subject property is a corner lot which is bordered on the south by Staples Avenue and on the east by Dorset Road. While the east side of the home (along Dorset Road) is technically considered the "front yard" (as a lesser amount of street frontage exists than along Staples Avenue), both yards are considered "front yards" in terms of applying setbacks along public streets. Thus, a 30 foot setback is imposed along both streets. The subject site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. AnalVsis: The applicant is proposing to construct a 64 square foot (8' x 8') front porch addition on the south side of his home. The addition is to match the eave height of the existing home. According to the applicant, the porch is intended to improve the "curb appeal" of the home. As shown on the submitted site plan, the porch encroaches 5 feet into the required 30 foot setback imposed along Staples Avenue. According to Section 12-1 D -4.C.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, covered and/or enclosed entryways (porches, decks, stoops, or similar structures) that extend into the front yard setback require the approval of a conditional use permit. In this regard, the Ordinance imposes the following conditions: (1) Such structure may not extend into the front or side yard more than five feet (5'). (2) Such structure shall be limited in size to fifty (50) square feet. (3) Such structure may not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with all of the preceding conditions. Just 40 square feet of the proposed structure would encroach into the setback area, with the remainder meeting the setback requirement. Also to be noted is that the porch is to be generally "centered" on the south side of the home. In this regard, the addition will not impact traffic visibility at the nearby Staples Avenue/Dorset Road intersection. Action Requested: Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: A. Approve the conditional use permit to allow a covered porch (entryway) to extend into a required front yard setback, based on a finding that, with conditions, the addition will not jeopardize the health safety and general welfare of the area. Conditions may include: The porch (entryway) be located no closer than 25 feet from the adjacent Staples Avenue right-of-way. 2 2. The site plan be modified to illustrate the location of the sidewalk connection between the porch and driveway. B. Deny the conditional use permit, based on a finding that the proposed porch addition will have a negative impact upon traffic visibility and on neighboring properties. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the construction of the porch addition with the conditions specified above. Supplementary Materials: 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Application Materials 3 Draft Findings of Fact for Approval Conditional Use Permit for Front Porch Addition 21 Dorset Road The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Permit: The proposed porch addition (and setback encroachment) will not impact traffic visibility at the Staples Avenue/Dorset Road intersection. 2. The proposed porch will visually improve the home. 3. The porch will not negatively impact any neighboring properties. 4. The proposed porch encroachment meets the terms of the zoning ordinance for such structures. CI ulty of Mendota HoE�i�ghts APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF .PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Date of Application Fee Paid Applicant Name: (a5 (_0 kk PH: ®g 6-7 (Last) (First) (M) E-MailAddress- 4� C'�*as ca I Q W' a; Address: _ 2.f IV (Number (Number & Street) (City). (State). (Zip) Owner Mime: (Last) (First), Address: (1Dvcs (Number & Street) (City) Street Location of Property in Question M ssf- -- (State) (Zip) Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed mast be provided) L LQ a 1< s �� ®2 m � It50 - ti — _d—a0__ Type.of Request _ Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional User. Permit for P. U. D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Comprehensive Pian Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property 1;`�': Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property << Proposed Use Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true I further' authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. Date Received (Signature of Applicant) (Signature of Owner) 1101. Victoria Curve a Mendota Heights, MN 55118 • (651) 452-1850 ° FAX (651) 452-8940 www.meandota-heights.com June 3, 2011 Dear Mendota Heights City Council, We are requesting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a small porch on our home at 21 Dorset Rd. It is required as the porch will extend 40 sq ft beyond the set back of our property line on the Staples side of our corner lot. (As you can see from our attached plans, our front door faces Staples.) We are anxious to upgrade our home to improve on our curb appeal that is in keeping with the other homes in our lovely neighborhood. An aerial view of our home and the surrounding properties will show that our project sets back much farther from the property line than many of our neighbors' homes, garages, and tennis court. We love our neighborhood and get along well with all of our neighbors and do not feel anyone would object to our project as it will only add to the attractiveness of the neighborhood as a whole. We have already spent a great deal of time and money on landscaping our property in past years. We respectfully request approval of our conditional use permit so we can move on with this much needed upgrade. Sincerely, John and Rebecca Driscoll NORTHWEST ,CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Tele hone: 7163.23'! .2555 Facsirnlle: 763.221-2561 planners@nacplannincl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Bob Kirmis / Stephen Grittman DATE: June 23, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Patio Installation CASE NO: Case No. 11-19; NAC Case 254.04 -11.14 APPLICANT(S): Beverly Sargent LOCATION: 1040 Highway 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway) ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR, Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: Recently, the City Council approved a Critical Area Permit to allow the installation of a fence along the side yard of property located at 1040 Highway 13. As a follow-up to such approval, the property owner (Beverly Sargent) has now requested approval of a Critical Area Permit to allow the construction of a 400 square foot (20' x 20') patio on the east side of her home. The patio is proposed to be surfaced in brick pavers and connect to an existing paver walkway located along the south side of the home. The subject site is zoned R-1, One Family Residential, and is located within the Mississippi River corridor. According to Section 12-3-17 of the Zoning Ordinance, any work conducted within the Mississippi River Corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. Analysis: Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is guided as LR, Low Density Residential in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The request to construct a patio is consistent with this land use category, which provides for single family development, including accessory structures and uses. rr�+„-moi eros ppr�,,it. This ___J ct p.roperty is located within the Mississippi River Critical Area . e .. , corridor. Any work conducted within this corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. According to the applicant, dirt which is removed for the patio construction will be relocated around an existing tree near the proposed patio area and used in a flower garden. While minor changes to the existing vegetation/landscaping, topography and/or drainage patterns (as a result of the patio construction) are not expected to adversely impact the subject site or adjacent properties, it is recommended that the volume of dirt to be relocated be specified by the applicant and the proposed soil relocation area be illustrated on the site plan. Setbacks. The Critical Area Ordinance specifies that no structure may be constructed within 40 feet of the bluff line of the river. The proposed patio lies well beyond the bluffline and normal high water mark setback requirements and also complies with applicable R-1 District setback requirements. Vegetation. It has not been indicated whether or not the proposed patio construction will result in the loss of any vegetation (other than turf). This should be clarified by the applicant. Impervious Surface Coverage. As a result of the patio construction, an additional 400 square feet of impervious area will exist upon the site. While the proposed coverage increase is not expected to adversely impact the site or neighboring properties, impervious surface coverage impacts should be clarified a condition of Critical Area Permit approval. This issue should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. Action Requested: After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: A. Approval of the Critical Area Permit to allow the patio construction, based on the following findings: the patio shall not involve any significant, grade changes, soil loss, or alteration of slopes; therefore, it shall not jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area, subject to the following conditions: 1. The volume of dirt to be relocated be specified by the applicant. 2. The proposed soil relocation area be illustrated on the site plan. 3. The applicant specify whether or not the proposed patio construction will result in the loss of any vegetation (other than turf). 4. Impervious surface coverage impacts be clarified. This issue should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. 2 B. Denial of the Critical Area Permit to construct a patio, based on the finding that the patio will negatively impact the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area. Staff Recommendation: Assuming associated landscaping and grade or slope alteration are minimal, the proposed patio construction should not have a negative impact upon the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. As a result, Planning Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit to construct the proposed patio subject to conditions. Supplementary Materials: 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Draft Findings for Denial 3. Application materials 141 Draft Findings for Approval Patio Construction in the Critical Area 1040 Highway 13 1. The proposed patio will have little or no visual impact on the critical area or surrounding property. 2. The patio will create no issues for grading or erosion, based on review and any comments from the City's engineering department.. 3. Construction of the patio will have no negative impacts upon the land as minimal landscaping, grade changes, and alteration of slopes 2,4e proposed. M Draft Findings for Denial Patio Construction in the Critical Area 1040 Highway 13 The proposed patio will have a negative visual impact on the critical area and neighboring property. 2. Construction of the patio has the potential to create grading and erosion issues. 3. Construction of the patio has the potential to have a substantial impact on the land as it may cause grade changes, soil loss, or the altering of slopes. k" APPLICATION FOR Cc.:.jNSIDERA T iON OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Date of Application Fee Paid e' �. �. Applicant Name:,`�e.}� _ '.�� _PN: (Last (First) (M E -Mail Address:------_ Address: - (Number & Street) (City) (State) Owner Name: v..__ �r --- --— (Lase ( first) (M) Address: � -- (Number & Street) Street Location of Property in Question: (City) (State) (Zip) Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title o 6 Deed must be provided) zt17 —6c' Type of Request _—__ Rezoning _______Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval -Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Proposed Zoning of Property Present Use Proposed Use Variance _Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on th bdditionai materia! are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to insr, _qt the above piaperty during daylight hours. Date Received nature of A(ppli6Writ) (Signature of Owner) I101 Wkloria Curve - Mendota Hehahts. MN 55118 1 (651) 4252-1850 ^ FAX (651) 452-8940 Bevelry Sargent Lot i Mayfieica' heights 27-47500-00-010 I propose to build a zo X zo patio next to my home. The patio will be a final destination for the paver walkway that currently runs behind my home. I will be putting the dirt I take out to build the patio into a flower garden that will be put in to hold the dirt back from around the tree that is next to the area. I will ring the patio with flowers. The patio will be made from brick pavers. Beverly Sargent Highway 40 20 0 40 Feet A Ak A 7 2,3310 7 City Of I Mendota Helchts 816 1032 18 I _ _ LL 4 816 1032 18 �V 1646 I _ _ �V 1646 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.96:36 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 piaritiers@ iaacpla^ .n;l iCJ..com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen W. Grittman DATE: June 24, 2011 MEETING DATE: June 28, 2011 SUBJECT: Variance to Setback for Freestanding Signs CASE NO: Case No. 2011 - 21; NAC Case 254.04 — 11. APPLICANT(S): Dave Albrecht on behalf of Brown College LOCATION: 1354 Mendota Heights Road ZONING: I - Industrial GUIDE PLAN: Industrial Background and Description of Request: The applicants are seeking a variance to permit the location of signs within the required setbacks from both Mendota Heights Road and Northland Drive, one sign at the entrance to each of these roads. The sign along Mendota Heights Road is proposed to be located 15 feet back of the existing curb, while the sign along Northland Drive is proposed to be located 12 feet of the existing curb. The general zoning ordinance requirement for freestanding sign setbacks along roads is that no sign is to be located within the building setback, which for the Industrial District is 40 feet. When this area was developed, the City had granted a blanket PUD approval cutting this setback requirement in half, to twenty feet. As such, most of the signs in the area are set back 20 feet. This setback is measured from the property line, rather than the curb line. As such, the sign setback as measured from the curb tends to be approximately 35 feet or so (depending on the width of the constructed street). Pnr +L.ho rirr%nosed signs, placing them 12 -15 f -Pt hi -hind the curb would result in their location being right at, or even on, the right of way. Essentially, the request is to place the signs with a "zero" setback from the right of line, rather than the 40 foot requirement or the 20 foot PUD allowance. Analysis: As a first comment, it is important to note that no private signs are permitted to be constructed on the public right of way. This is a use issue, and a variance may not be granted for use. Based on measurements using the Dakota County aerial photographs of this area, the width of the right of way from curb to property line appears to be approximately 15-16 feet (measurements on these photos are not precise). With this estimate, the signs may be located no closer than 15 — 16 feet to the curb, even if a setback of zero feet were to be considered. In this report, we will consider the setback variance request as being an application to place the signs with a zero setback. When considering variances, the revised standards in state law require the following analysis: The City must find that an application for variance is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner, not inconsistent with the manner in which other property in the neighborhood may be used, and where there are unique conditions on the property, not created by the applicant, that constitute "practical difficulties" in using the property in such a way. The applicant in this case is suggesting that existing vegetation obscures visibility of existing signs, and that placement as proposed is necessary to provide visibility. To approve the variances as requested, the City must find that the zero setback for signs constitutes a reasonable manner of use, and that the conditions leading to the variance are unique to the property in question, not created by the applicant, and would be consistent with the character of the neighborhood in which the property is located. The purpose ofsignage is to provide information to travelers about the location of a particular land use. Visibility of signs would be necessary to achieve this purpose. To support this purpose, the City has previously approved a blanket 20 foot setback for the area, and the properties in the area have been constructed to that standard, with only a few exceptions. While landscaping can clearly obscure the view of sign locations, landscaping can be maintained in a way that permits better visibility through pruning, tree relocation, or other methods. Moreover, landscaping is a common condition on the properties in the area. If it is to be cited as a reason for approving variances whenever it obscures sign visibility, the industrial park area will soon have a common condition of signs with zero setbacks. Action Requested: Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: A. Approval of the variance to sign setbacks for Brown College to a zero setback from Mendota Heights Road and Northland Drive, based on findings attached to this report. B. Denial of the variance to sign setbacks, based on findings attached to this report. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff does not support the variances as proposed. As noted in the report, the conditions cited to support the variance request relate to landscaping on the property. While landscaping is an important element in the attractiveness and aesthetics of the industrial park area, and in fact is often a required amenity, it is not required in such a way as to interfere with the functional use of the property. Moreover, because landscaping is a common condition of the property development in the area, it does not, by itself, meet the test for "uniqueness" required by the variance analysis. As such, staff recommends that the applicants make other modifications to the property if necessary, and place the proposed signs consistent with the 20 foot setback applied to this and other property in the district. Supplementary Materials: Draft Findings for Approval Variance for Sign Setback 1354 Mendota Heights Road 1. Sign visibility is obscured by pre-existing vegetation 2. Removal or modification of the existing vegetation would negatively impact the property. 3. Location of the signs in the proposed "zero -setback" location is necessary to resolve traffic safety concerns due to lack of visibility. Draft Findings for Denial Variance for Sign Seback 1354 Mendota Heights Road 1. The conditions raising issues for sign visibility are not unique to the property in question, but are common throughout the district. 2. The City has set a standard for sign setback by previous PUD approval at 20 feet which has become the common condition in the area. 3. Vegetation obscuring visibility of the signs can be modified or removed to resolve the difficulty. 4. Grant of this variance would be establishing a privilege for this property which has been denied to others in the district. City of W A AMe ndota He ghts APPLICATION. FOR CQN,SIDERAT1 , N. OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No, LtO Date of. Application; iI I l I Fee Paid.. ApplicantName.i4,red,�` "' 1, '-) 0 (Last) (First) (M} Address: zrA , er t h) (Number & Street) (City) (State) (zip)d I ��') Owner Name:. D (Last) (Firs, (M) Address: (l/ f 5 (Number Sireef) (Cit (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Questior` Legal be, cnptt.on & PIN of ,Property: (. .Property ID 27-48251-020-01 MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS CENTER 2ND ADDITION 21 e provjded) i Type of Request: f Rezoning I Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Wetlands PerrYiat Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Critical Area Permit Comprehe* Wve Plan Amendment Other (attach explanation) Applicable City Ordinance Number Section Present Zoning of Property present Use Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use - hereby declare that all statements made`in this request and on the additional matedbl are true. I further authorize City Officials and agen to 'Hsps t the above property during daylight hours. alt �Z 7-7777777 TR Mendota Heights LLC Date Received By: Cornerstone Real Estate Advisors LLC, its Manager NorthMarq Real Estate Services LLC, its Agent 1101 Victoria Curve'. Mendots By: Date:�� Letter Of Intent The reason we are applying for a variance is so that the signs are visible from Northland and Mendota Heights Road. This particular property has trees surrounding the entire perimeter and under normal guidelines they would not be visible to drivers. We will be keeping the signs as far back as possible from the property line but to still remain visible to drivers. Also with this packet is an overhead view of where we are proposing to have these signs placed. Dave Albrecht Northland Dr. Mendota Heioht� R� z 0 h 43" I F5 z 0 C) 0 O O F5 z 0 C) 0 O Esp."" Mwai I