The URL can be used to link to this page

2010-10-26 Planning Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA October 26, 2010 - 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Approval of the September 28, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes 5. Hearings a. Case No. 10-30: Daniel and Jodi Saltzman — 1921 Glenhill Road — Critical area permit to enclose an existing second floor deck to add to the square footage on the second floor of their home. Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. b. Case No. 10-31: Richard Nelson — 796 Havenview Court — Wetlands permit for a fence. Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. c. Case No. 10-32: Robert and Katherine Thompson — 979 Caren Court - Critical area permit for a fence. Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. 6. Verbal Review 7. Adj ourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 651-452-1850 with requests. • 0 Planning Connnission Minutes September 28, 2010 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 28, 2010, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Povolny, Commissioners Field, Hennes, Norton, and Viksnins. Those absent: Commissioner McManus. Those present were Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mazzitello, and NAC Planner Grittman. Minutes were recorded by Carla Wirth. Approval of July 27 2010 Minutes COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 27, 2010, AS PRESENTED. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 Hearings PLANNING CASE #10-27 Thomas Ademite 804 Park Place Drive Conditional Use Permit for a fence around a pool Planner Steve Grittman presented the application of Thomas Ademite requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow the construction of a fence surrounding a swimming pool at 804 Park Place Drive. The property is on the southwest corner of Park Place Drive and Wachtler Avenue and is zoned R-1, one family residential. He explained the purpose of the CUP is to ensure the proposed fence will not interfere with the character of the neighborhood or with the general public's health, safety, or welfare. While a three-foot high fence is permitted without approval of a CUP, the city established the CUP process to accommodate requests where property owners have corner lots adjacent to busier roadways and who prefer taller fences to allow for added privacy and security. Staff recommends approval of the CUP for the proposed fence within the side and rear yard setback of 804 Park Place Drive based on the rationale that the ordinance was written to accommodate this type of request and the proposed fence is consistent with others that have been previously approved by the city. Commissioner Field noted with this application, the pool is planned but not yet installed so both are being presented, the pool and the fence. Mr. Grittman stated that is correct. Chair Povolny noted the applicant is not in attendance. Assistant to the City Administrator Sedlacek stated the Commission can still consider the application or postpone it until the applicant is in attendance to answer questions. Chair Povolny asked the Commission if anyone has questions. No one responded with a question. Chair Povolny opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Povolny asked for a motion to close the public hearing. CHAIR POVOLNY MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 2010 AYES 5 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL RECEIVE A FENCE PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE FENCE;AND 2. THE FENCE SHALL MEET THE REGULATIONS ESTABISHED IN SECTION 12-113-6, INCLUDING THE SIX FOOT HEIGHT MAXIMUM AND THE 30% OPEN DESIGN REQUIREMENT. AYES 5 NAYS 0 Chair Povolny advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 5, 2010, meeting. Commissioner Field stated he would like the applicant to always be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting and asked staff to assure it is scheduled on a date the applicant can attend. Or, that the applicant be informed that their application will be laid over until they can attend the meeting. Mr. Grittman stated staff does advise the applicant to attend the meeting. Commissioner Viksnins agreed that the applicant should be in attendance; however, in this case the Commission had no questions on the application. PLANNING CASE #10-28 Karry and Lisa Knoll 1836 Rolling Green Curve Wetlands Permit for pool and fence Planner Grittman presented the application of Karry Knoll requesting approval of a wetlands pen -nit to install an in - ground pool and fence at 1836 Rolling Green Curve. The project involves installing an in -ground pool, concrete apron, fence along the rear yard of the property, and removal of two maple trees in the southwest and southeast corners of the property. The property is zoned R-1, one family residential, and a wetland is located directly to the south of the subject home. Mr. Grittman displayed a site plan to identify the area of the pool, deck, and fence. He advised the improvements are all within 100 feet of a wetland and the zoning ordinance requires a wetlands permit for any work within that buffer zone to assure the improvements do not degrade the water quality or biological function of the wetland. He noted the improvement will encroach within 20 feet of the wetland edge and while it does not violate a specific setback requirement, staff has encouraged the applicant to shift the improvements four to five feet closer to the home, to the north, to retain as much green space and buffer along the wetland as possible. Staff recommends approval of the wetlands permit for the installation of the in -ground pool, concrete area, fence, and landscaping work subject to the five conditions detailed in the staff report that includes moving the fence at least five feet to the north of its proposed location, increasing the setback between the impervious surface and wetland to add additional buffering between the improved area and wetland, which will help filter runoff into the wetland. Commissioner Field asked if the warranty deed was included to identify the applicant's property. Mr. Grittman stated he is unsure why some of the information was included with the application and it was not in response to staff questions. N Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 2010 Commissioner Viksnins asked how strong a suggestion can be made to move the improvements five feet. Mr. Grittman stated staff was not familiar enough with existing conditions to make it a requirement for approval but wanted to raise the option for consideration and discussion. Commissioner Viksnins asked what can be done if the applicant does not agree to move the improvements away from the wetland and if it could be a basis for denial. Mr. Grittman stated staff would not feel comfortable citing it as a basis for denial since it technically meets the wetland code. Chair Povolny stated he has a pool and was told by the city that the pool had to be ten feet from any footing, including deck footings and steps if they have footings. Public Works Director/City Engineer Mazzitello stated that is part of the International Building Code and a requirement of the building permit. Commissioner Field asked if it could not be approved for a building permit if the improvements were within ten feet of a footing. Mr. Mazzitello stated that would be correct and he will confirm the matter with the Building Official. Mr. Grittman stated that may be why the applicant has proposed this location for the pool. Commissioner Field stated there appears to be a handwritten note on the plan diagram to change a dimension from three feet to five feet. Mr. Grittman agreed that appears to be the case. Commissioner Field noted that would be the corner closet to the wetland so the only way the applicant could construct the pool five feet farther from the wetland would be to reduce the distance from the edge of the pool and edge of the steps to the deck. Mr. Grittman answered in the affirmative. Karry Knoll, 1836 Rolling Green Curve, applicant, stated his understanding the pool had to be ten feet from the house. He stated if it is moved more than five feet, he was concerned someone could fall into the pool from the deck. He stated he would agree with several feet because it would be less concrete and a lower cost. Commissioner Norton stated if the distance from the wetland is adjusted by five feet, it would dramatically reduce the size of the patio and may be too small to hold furniture. Mr. Knoll stated they already have an existing patio and could agree to an adjustment of several feet, but not too far. Commissioner Field asked if the measurement on the diagram is three feet or five feet and which dimension the setback calculation is based on. Mr. Grittman stated it appeared to staff that the five-foot deck width between the pool and fence was calculated into the overall setback. Chair Povolny stated his preference for five feet, rather than to reduce it to three feet, to assure safety and adequate access should two people pass each other on the deck area. Mr. Knoll agreed and explained the concrete apron is not intended to be a big area because it is next to the wetlands, which is sometimes foul smelling. Chair Povolny opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Povolny asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER FIELD, MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NORTON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES NAYS Commissioner Norton stated he would support a motion for approval that excluded the condition to move the pool five feet based on the rationale that it would violate the International Building Code. COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A WETLANDS PERMIT AS REQUESTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 3 Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 20JO 1. ADDITIONAL NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE PLANTED BETWEEN THE WETLAND AREA; 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST FOLLOW THE LAND DISTURBANCE DOCUMENT; 3. ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER; AND 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL RECEIVE PROPER BUILDING AND FENCE PERMITS INSTALLATION OR CONSTRUCTION WORK. AYES NAYS POOL AND GUIDANCE Chair Povolny advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 5, 2010, meeting. PLANNING CASE #10-29 Jane Freeman 1166 Kingsley Court Critical Area Permit for a fence Mr. Sedlacek advised that the applicant had indicated she was unable to attend tonight's meeting. PRIOR TO Planner Grithnan presented the application of Jane Freeman for approval of a critical area permit in order to install a fence along the south property line within the common area of the Kingsley Estates Townhomes. The property is located at 1166 Kingsley Court, zoned R-1, one family residential, and within the Mississippi River corridor. Mr. Grittman displayed a site plan to describe the subject property and location of the proposed fence directly south of the applicant's unit. The wooden privacy fence would provide screening between the applicant's unit and the adjacent single family home to the south. Mr. Grittman advised that this area is governed by the Critical Area Ordinance so a critical area permit is required to assure the sensitive bluff regions of the Mississippi River corridor are protected and building materials are natural and blend with the environment. In this case, the applicant is proposing a wood fence which meets the requirements of code and is not within the bluff setbacks. Staff recommends approval of the critical area permit to construct a 6 -foot high, 48 -foot long fence as no landscaping, paving, soil loss, change in grades, or altering of slopes is planned. Thus, the project should not have a negative impact on the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical areas. Commissioner Field asked who is the applicant, the Homeowner's Association or Ms. Freeman. Mr. Sedlacek clarified that the applicant is Jane Freeman and the signature of owner is by Mr. Murphy, the Kingsley Estates Association Manager. Chair Povolny opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Povolny asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES NAYS COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CRITICAL AREA PERMIT AS REQUESTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL RECEIVE A FENCE PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE FENCE; AND M Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 2010 THE FENCE SHALL MEET THE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 12-1D-6, INCLUDING THE 30% OPEN DESIGN REQUIREMENT. AYES 5 NAYS 0 Chair Povolny advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 5, 2010, meeting. Verbal Review Mr. Sedlacek gave the following verbal review: PLANNING CASE #10-12 Troy Troje Conditional Use Permit • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-18 Elizabeth Tetzlaff Conditional Use Permit • Applicant withdrew the variance and CUP request. PLANNING CASE #10-20 Stephen and Jana Patrick Lot Split • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-23 Stephen and Sherry Kampa Wetlands Pen -nit • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-24 Rob and Stacy Hermann Conditional Use Permit • Applicant withdrew variance request and CUP approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-25 Paul Plumb Lot Split • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-26 Peter Opitz Wetlands Permit Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Field asked whether the city will undertake review of its Zoning Code to address the recent Supreme Court ruling relating to variances. Commissioner Hennes stated if the Council is not inclined to consider variance requests, it may be beneficial to hold a joint meeting with the Council, after the new Council is seated in 2011, to discuss the matter. Mr. Grittman stated that question can be addressed with the Council. Commissioner Field stated that variances for garage setbacks for post World War II have been considered because they lend themselves to the narrow size of those lots and perhaps a CUP consideration would be appropriate in those cases. Mr. Grittman stated those lots probably comply with the more rigorous review required by the Supreme Court based on reasonable use. Conunissioner Field stated suggested past cases be reviewed and a detennination made on what is good policy. Mr. Grittman stated staff can prepare a summary of variance applications that have been reviewed. Mr. Sedlacek advised that the League will be lobbying for new legislation, perhaps to find a middle ground between how variances have been considered and the new Supreme Court ruling. Commissioner Field stated since Chair Lally has resigned, the Commission should consider its organizational structure at the next meeting to identify a Vice Chair. Chair Povolny concurred and asked staff to schedule that on the next agenda. Chair Povolny thanked Joe Lally for his years of service to Mendota Heights and stated he will be missed. The Commissioners concurred. 5 Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 2010 Mr. Sedlacek advised that Commission appointments will be available for Chair Lally's term and Commissioner McManus who has termed out. He stated those two openings will be advertised and encouraged interested residents to make application. Adiourn COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:43 P.M. AYES 6 NAYS 0 Respectfully submitted, Carla Wirth, Recording Secretary on NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, l 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 plan ners@nacplanning.cam MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Bob Kirmis / Stephen Grittman DATE: October 21, 2010 MEETING DATE: October 26, 2010 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Home Addition (Deck Conversion) CASE NO: Case No. 10-30; NAC Case 254.04 - 10.33 APPLICANT(S): Daniel and Jody Saltzman LOCATION: 1921 Glenhill Road ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR, Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: The applicants, Daniel and Jodi Saltzman, are seeking a Critical Area Permit to allow the construction of a home addition in the rear (west) yard of their property located at 1921 Glenhill Road. Specifically, the applicants wish to enclose an existing second floor deck, converting it to interior living space (a master bathroom addition). The existing deck measures approximately 200 square feet in size (14'-8" x 13'-6"). While the proposed deck conversion will not expand the existing footprint of the structure, the roofline of the home will however, be extended to cover the existing deck area. The area below the deck is currently utilized as a screened porch. No modifications to the space are proposed. The subject site is zoned R-1, One Family Residential and is located within the Critical Area Overlay District of the Mississippi River corridor. According to Section 12-3-17 of the Zoning Ordinance, any work conducted within the Mississippi River Corridor requires a "Critical Area Permit". Analysis: Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is guided as LR, Low Density Residential within the City's 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The home addition request is consistent with this land use category, which provides for single family development upon the subject property. Critical Area Permit. As noted, any work conducted within the Mississippi River corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. As a part of this project, no landscaping or paving is being considered, no change in grade is planned, no soil loss is anticipated during construction, and no slopes are being affected. As a result, the proposed home addition should not have a negative impact on the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. Setbacks. The proposed home addition will occupy the current footprint of the home's second floor deck. The deck and proposed addition/conversion is well within setback requirements of the applicable R-1 and Critical Area Overly Districts. Roof / Impervious Surface Coverage. As part of the proposed deck conversion, a roof dormer is to be extended from the existing roof over the proposed addition. The roof extension is to be a "hip" style which will match the home's existing roof design. The height of the roof dormer will be less than the high point of the existing roof line and well within the maximum 25 foot height requirement of the R-1 zoning district. According to the applicants, their will be no change in drainage patterns upon the subject property. In review of the submitted application materials, it is unclear if the proposed roof extension (dormer) will replace an existing impervious roof structure (which covers the lower level porch). As a condition of Critical Area Permit approval, impervious surface coverage impacts should be clarified. This issue should be subject to comment by the City Engineer. Vegetation. The proposed deck conversion will not result in the loss of existing on-site vegetation. Finish Materials. According to the submitted building elevations, the proposed addition is to be finished in siding which will match the existing structure. As a condition of permit approval, it is recommended that the addition also match the existing structure in color. Action Requested: After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: Approval of the Critical Area Permit to allow the proposed home addition (deck conversion), based on the following findings: the project shall not involve landscaping, paving, changing in grades, soil loss, or altering of 0 slopes; therefore, it shall not jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area, subject to the following conditions: a) The applicant clarify whether or not an increase in impervious surface coverage will result from the proposed home addition (deck conversion) and associated roof extension. This issue shall be subject to comment by the City Engineer. b) Exterior finish materials of the proposed home addition (deck conversion) match the existing home in color. � 2. Denial of the Critical Area Permit to allow the home addition (deck conversion), based on the finding that the project will negatively impact the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area. Staff Recommendation: Considering that no landscaping, paving, soil loss, grade or slope alteration is planned, the proposed home addition (deck conversion) should not have a negative impact upon the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. As a result, Planning Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit. Supplementary Materials: 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Draft Findings for Denial 3. Application materials dated September 30, 2010 4. Site Location map 3 Draft Findings for Approval Home Addition in the Critical Area 1921 Glenhill Road The proposed home addition (deck conversion) will have little or no visual impact on the critical area or surrounding property. 2. The proposed home addition (deck conversion) will create no issues for grading or erosion. 3. The proposed home addition (deck conversion) will have minimal impact on the land as it does not involve landscaping, paving, grade changes, soil loss, or altering of slopes. 10 Draft Findings for Denial Home Addition in the Critical Area 1921 Glenhill Road 1. The proposed home addition (deck conversion) will have a negative visual impact on the critical area and neighboring property. 2. The proposed home addition (deck conversion) has the potential for creating grading and erosion issues. 3. The proposed home addition (deck conversion) has the potential for having a substantial impact on the land as it may cause grade changes, soil loss, or the altering of slopes. F'1 1827 1831 1830 � 1835 1836 n 1840 1845 1855 1850 1867 1860 M N 1875 Cv 1140 1101 Highway 110 > m Centre Pointe Cv a� c 0 a. CD 2020 1150 1110 2025 .� c m V 2060 ] 1155 b Site Location Map Parcels Water/Wetlands Centre Pointe Dr 1110 1870 1254 1885 1880 1889 N 2 6 1890 1901 �g0 2 X900 90 1905 1907 X242 N 1921 Glenhill Road 1908 0 1916 14 0)rn 1920 T CO 0 370 10 ^ti � titiu igan a `° r r .a 1936 Veronica a 390 W co 0 o m 794 = °' v co00 1942 r' rn � 1310 0 °j U' 1948 1991 °� u7 Cl) 1 30a 1954 N CO 11 32 y 0 1219 rn w 39 Cv 1140 1101 Highway 110 > m Centre Pointe Cv a� c 0 a. CD 2020 1150 1110 2025 .� c m V 2060 ] 1155 b Site Location Map Parcels Water/Wetlands Centre Pointe Dr 1110 In ty of Mendota _ APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION. OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. � � ' • � �° ___-_ Date of Application Fee Paid Applic int Mame:� ��---PH: � �� .�..— - (Last) (First) (M) E -Mail Addres�:� t_�� _'°% (204 / M Address: f�_- (Number & Street) (City (State) (Zip) Owner Name: Address, - (Last) umber & �-treet) W'I (First) (City) (State) (Lip) Street Location of Property in Question: --------- Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request: ___ Rez_oning Conditional Use Permit — _Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. �_— Preliminary/Final Plat Approval — Comprehensive Plan Amendment --..Variance Subdivision Approval _ Wetlands Permit y Critical Area Permit ____other (attach explanation) Applicable: City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property_ Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this request I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect PE Gate Received Section 3 and on the additional meaterial are true. abov19 property during daylight hOW-S. AppiVmt) e 11®1 victoria Curve ° Mendota Heights, Mr -4 55118 ° (651) 452-1B5® PAX (651) 452-8940 www.mendota-heights.com 1921 Glenhill Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 September 29, 2010 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Letter of Intent for Planning Request at 1921 Glenhill Road To Whom It May Concern: This notice is to serve as a letter of intent for construction at our home at 1921 Glenhill Road. In summary, we are remodeling some interior space and enclosing an existing second floor deck to add to the square footage on the second floor of our home. This remodel will not alter the footprint of the existing structure. Furthermore, the enclosure of the second floor deck on the existing structure will not be extended beyond what it is now. The roof of the home will be extended to cover the enclosed deck. Thank you for your time and attention. Jodi and Daniel Saltzman Summary of the Project at 1921 Glenhill Road in response to the Critical Area Permit 4. No change in water drainage to the existing property S. Soil type will not change or be altered 6. No unique plants or animals found on the property other than an obstinate 13 pound white Bichon Frise named Millie 7. There is no historical significance to our home 8. No change to the existing grading is planned 9. No change to the existing landscape is planned 10. No change in the drainage is planned for the site. 11. An erosion and sedimentation control plan is not needed since there is no intent to alter the contour of the property 12. There will be no change to the height of the structure 13. There will be no areas that will be paved 14. There will be no vehicular or pedestrian access to my property 15. No parking facilities will be part of this project 16. No part of my property will be dedicated for public use 17. No soils will be excavated other than footings that will be poured to bolster the enclosure of the second floor deck 18. N/A CKzt _ � a .lam- -' �._ '. -.. ::- . - _;�--_- •.,.-":Oi�p9/`�-1 - - - � Fti :l `� - �" 3.6L;�Z'a 68iV"' �' : ,,%f�/�•crEp _- AW�, b o �.: •. - '0 oa w; .f�sl. Cy j .:. " _- :°:' :. �;::. •' , •- _ ��rM l78 ..�_-c`�'�`t , ; ,�4� `�� , - • ' :� _ r.�;": 'a E3GlL'r. � "" �' L46E%. ""sr_-8F69�'= � � •p - _ '.. "" _ �'� .. _ - _ �+n(-�� ''/." °a n ?. /14 0Zr 9?' ABN . Q� ;� %�:� • _ ;std,-sem-�: _ ��y� �' • "�f�kb.��. - IN _ J .. 2;• ' '`� a_ ' G Q - f `ti-900.1 }. - n;A9,fZ68N -3?-3 1,. L7 �`1' � - � `_-O��•Y.� -�l'' _" q� � :. �,'` �N'OE;SS°�jB�Y~7� IN � � � <n`I ``•--. a/ �% �? � Vit. ..:/,qy \ ` �. r : �r.f �V J' . : Q• t , :d 7x1 (�� 7o I. �` %ij" P;:• .. Job ISS'./ -� tV -.Ott/ "" qr a: . � `°�' - - ?r4SL _,_-•-�_- 6- 6L 'fes%2' - �2� " �O�/. - � . .. � •" i�- "`J ,gyp' QG :Lr?"o.6,9. - o. ,tl,oa,�d-o66,s ,�tj ' 3,.88, �'�`o6�M " •' 044 .. :Qtv �:.. Q 7 tV V! VI y -404 .: � 4t.0- P a• ro: '...' o w a a ro .'... :. 4-1yi tt} 4 TZ4 -0 w.F4 . o U .- " k b Fd Z rY1 Uu f.fa .144 SIS" i� •ri.e� 4-4 4j N -.44 CS Ch �4 Q. .4'V o ; .a) •- o m 0 u - a ni JJ ' a� a) G vi � O Q i ► 4 3 3 tS� t11: 4 t bZ €a . Cd 6 6J - ' G) .4..1. H' Q! .:%' 4-{ ' +' .tom (� }a t-{ a) ,.0 , n n .a �'. 'O. O •H 4J:. _a) ' ^� ,- 0 cl ,0' 3' k uCi' . E-+ : -4 O .0 •ri :CJ Qi• ,C ,. n :� of .,G. fl � .. :n .� ..:U .0 - :.... �. - ^ ^ ^d.:� E^4 , -, .x bfJ, a4: " V O .0 W u ' 4-t vwi Uro' Ci. :at" A ;,4 0 0 U .H � 41 ca J4 ,� t� „k 4-? : A +, 43 A 0 0 fl 0 0 t o -W � of `O t], ,):;7 r+..<O •,� a7 �t Ti. �� `' e1 v) 44- � ; W ' �1 -W'- cn. �. - . •� 10 Q 1J_. -t~ 4t �r1.•ra U) :0 . . G)" b Z. --' ':.-.:. .u1 -p ' tom.7 .cR cf3.:f-a .^ p G CZ U . -" •r-4 ^d { ). r; -r W... . � •� ;i-'_ : •=^'t� �: ca,'CS -''.0 °.C" � .-4:- .:.:.+� .'P- c�i �- � 3 �: � U U O X. ttf F u a u ;.,-•t• ro a) ' . _ 0'r -m+ 4..t 4i ' : C7.':W d) 'T? Ui 'O U. -:a : n� A U a� ro. .. :4-i a� �;: G; w..: .: • 0' '�+- :a�. :.H . � ;..s o a� ( �) y7 4-1 N U G! ls..ri ; +: • :. tT. O 1)..41 : C1.::g. -4j.: err . Q}-:�r{:.G C '. �U 'ua . +: 4-1 'Ls '. O :rn U.?,U : �.':.'a7:...•.l+:.af:�^I tiA. ': ..' ...:r4';),.@'`; .�t.4?.-'.:0 O, V),,_, -� � �-:'ts 'u � U �d .C.- U-:f� A :Fa � :�.+ � �: � :� c�1: = H x' � 44 "U :� 44i 60. a ' " v ev ar : CO ac . - ::a� :: ' , cd :.. _m .; a.:" ....ur ro-., .-v ::, < ;;vi w; . cn.: :f - a� a� t -t at" ro 0 ati:p -;G ro •r 4 � :� f4G:.": . 3.'d ' .n..a) ;j.b:.:..: ,: ..bb O ^ •,-4 O ro +' `3 : '' G. w 0 ... E -o ..� *-+.. c 'Cy ^�3': : ctS- : '': ` :: +.;..::3> -'" ' .0 . :.''' - u .►-a : �a : V. w Z. � -'' rt �: -': � 4v.... a0,� ;" ,.�, ' o-� ' .'': 3 ro ° .".a at 0). .(':-.yoJ, .aja:t- ;/u v ��a.; u{� •f"?- a) �-•� 0)Aj 41 `f'1 T` ��. �y. /a�f (a�}..ten} �V. e.h l.'r'•V- ' /v��.M� %�� i"-,-F±(`•rT .:•4 M`7 •�J -.Q.'•t 'c•:/-�y:r:: ":_.".,V r-+ - :O .a0, "• Q -U •.� A. •rt 44 p a '�-•+: Ps :'c ."i.•.:i�'f'::IY �. ;�,.tn, ° F+ o : n. f::.i .:a'_ :.:crJ =aa : ai :cJ '.sC . ,, �, , .:,4 �; 3 •o :4a .. '3 • - .xu :4. :4 .: O 'U3 "-. ;-�� <.�- .:-. w O : p a 44 O. �+ .�.' :N . U :OC� . .a. ' a: -.a)u :1-1,::•�cnt.:°. .:sc.n�: .. `:n.:' ;an:�::aj U,�.W :,: a:.. ' � - . ,a-' �" 4.4 N .:a:.r-4 " 0'-'- 4 -.0.,•U. w .0 ' Wit ro ca..� k: � . c}c.:cy:':cd_:. , ~O 10 � A 41. -w 4. Cd 14, : , to 44. �+ r;.:: ; a ci - :-. :: °'. '': ds' ;aa. . u a�.::=.. vi:- . ;cu w.r -r . ::ro a.. ' " : v? o ..::.,U • .. : a a u av O sd u� a� vz; ar..a) c:� .� -iw u O . :: 'k a� :v : �s.:.' u' v ^v' a . oa 1::0 ' .': .:.: ' •n � a..� u). _Q<4j: a.'.Q.' : ' ::x 3: ►=a : •� v 'a�':v' : °' w. :.a� ..:.a_...a, ., _ .�►'. ' tb Z a1" Vy ' . {„1 ... 4a :.5i :4 fi . r {. 11. �f N. !r1 11- L3 . t". ;i-7 �r! : �i 1 ; Q_ fir{ . 4- r1=a-? . .0 .1-1 .:ct3. . Q- a ro U U CO 4.j 0 3.1z .G �. Vi i1 C.3'4-1 -4).. 0 .. .ti .-.:fl-W-a : Vr O r-4.-:� .. cv 4 i''ri •Q rl � c 0. --bb urr 4 Q- cd ". t-•.4' . :O :'nff 4ht _�Tf.41 : •�1: O 41.h� c�Gt.. ,-a .�r�iy 4� gin . (�.(' ./ t rj Qi •ri.. !-+ •4�J � `m IR � �'1"'4 ra` ^,\'' �'/�I .F�-' n P�.:�'!'. Mme-, 4+: �cny y.�' y V Y_l-� '�/:�. Vt W M1 ''�••+: wl: �F! T+':�M�f' Q� a} Tl 'C'4 '� N..•a ► a: cd : ^ i '. t�L.,,{ "" 0...0 4.:=. a W ^ .GG a) cn.'N: :: t)t, : ay ...4-4 N a ro: aca. c .r'-4 r-4 4 0 0- � '�, � Z P .ai 4 !!7�' .G a ��4 _a� 4•1..u. _tt3.':N p .r4 .0 . u.:�... .0.. j 41 • 'tf 61 : . r+ - - : - '- •, b.: . u� cu.: a�"'A : •�4 m V) . O -.' �.: 4u w . O �4 A " {-) (] -a) d) L" -.C7 U . • _ n .!_i -ici .. r! .. n ns �•! t� .-t " CSi •.:.. Qi (!y tt.i'6i- r-----------------------� 1 � I I I Rv vv Gln I I WNL LUE ABAG f� I I = I u < — u.-g.. ®� . rmor Twssrs�� sh i WNL LBF AEA'EFp r� I I I is IXSTINGF T RIS NI \♦ ZAPRT. PP- ti GT. A (.IH6 #MR. ll1 (� X 2 T W- O F $y � � � c urrN 2APRr N D F� F We j00 N X N N I M rn A_______________________ a r fn EXISfINb PiLGC FOCFDATL(T! _____________________ li � I II II —-L------- --------�--J1__ IL It I P IIS x I _____________________I 9I1 I. fu i I iI t I i I I i I 70 a II i � II u Ij II 4 �I II II II ll � II IL r m FINAL TOUCH CONSTRUCTION z z DAN AND JODI SALTZMAN $ m O 1921 GLEN HILL ROAD -3 ff ff jj MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN §§ w 2 |$tt|||�� Q�� CONSTRUCTION j}§lool k[k ? § ]&§ g§ , Al' DAN AND JOS SALTZU&N 2 \ rnR` ; o2m GLEN HILL ROAD § j� MENDOTA HEIGHTS, ©N . 771 � � � \ � \ ! $ . w 2 |$tt|||�� Q�� CONSTRUCTION j}§lool k[k ? § ]&§ g§ , Al' DAN AND JOS SALTZU&N 2 \ rnR` ; o2m GLEN HILL ROAD § j� MENDOTA HEIGHTS, ©N . O 0 U2 L6 CD LU CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING October 6. 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, October 26, 2010 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Daniel and Jodi Saltzman for a Critical Area Permit to enclose an existing second floor deck to add to the square footage on the second floor of the home located at the following described property: Lot 7 Block 1 Valley View Oak (PIN #27-81250-070-01) More particularly this property is located at 1921 Glenhill Road This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 3 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this Critical Area Permit will be heard at this meeting. Nancy J. Bauer Acting City Clerk Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-1850. 1921 Glenhill Road Dakota County, MN Disclaimer.' Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, 1 inch = 119 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. 124- 24-125•t 1254 N 725.5 ,i` 12.1 i' -_.. I... _ r• _`- .ri Jit. -. r'� ? 1,75 .. .. ... 1932 1213 i ! 1 r?i 19-0•g I 4 r --I` i s it 12351- 1242 _! — A� . 1G cv 1it IR 1205 51921 �r •, i G, 48 1923 t - = � � - & ^139 �1 32 123J 2^ 2 CULLI: �.N LN 1224 3 13� 12 11 T 3rJ #--J -- L (r l 936 _J Y44 r � 1206 1941----_- L -42 1749- N ry 1- 1949 1 Disclaimer.' Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, 1 inch = 119 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Rruestle Robert H Jewell Kathryn Lovaas Tste Gavin Thomas C & Sara H G St 1948 Glenhill Rd 1199 Culligan Ln idota Mn 55150-1427 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4164 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4102 Krisko Brian E & Jennifer L Whitcomb Joel C Means Steven B & Catherine 1205 Culligan Ln 1200 Culligan Ln 1889 Hunter Ln Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4101 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4110 Van Joy R Tste St Michel Rodney J & Pamela K Juliette Joseph W 1885 Hunter Ln 1903 Hunter Ln 1920 Glenhill Rd Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4110 Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4164 Commers Clement & Molly City Of Mendota Heights Lacina Laura 1942 Glen Hill Rd 1101 Victoria Cury 1914 Glen Hill Rd Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4164 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Mcevoy Patrick H & Renee L Swanson Richard E & Nancy Johns1902 onErrk W Glenhill Rd 1936 Glen Hill Rd Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4164 1908 Glenhill Rd Saint Paul Mn 55118-4149 Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Connelly Evans E Jr & Ann M Roszak John M Saltzman Daniel A & Jodi G 1921 Glenhill Rd 1901 Glenhill Rd Saint Paul Mn 55118-4149 1235 Culligan Ln Saint Paul Mn 55118-4151 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4165 Roszak John M Ciresi Dominic M Lachenmayer Richard & B M 1235 Culligan Ln 1247 Culligan Ln Heights Mn 55118 1253 Culligan Ln Saint Paul Mn 55118-4151 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4151 Mendota Olsen David & Gloria Sethna Michael & Ruth L Sethna Michael P 1242 Culligan Ln 1254 Culligan Ln Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4150 1242 Culligan Ln Saint Paul Mn 55118-4150 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4150 Krebsbach Norbert J & Sandra Arlandson John R & Ivalee C Vannelli Thomas P & Teresa D 1230 Culligan Lane Saint Paul Mn 55118-4150 1224 Culligan Ln Saint Paul Mn 55118-4150 1935 Glenhill Rd Saint Paul Mn 55118-4165 Culligan Lawrence J & Mary M Culligan Lawrence J Mckay Jane 8990 Bay Colony Dr #903 8990 Bay Colony Dr #903 1949 Glenhill Rd Naples FI 34108-6704 Naples FI 34108-6704 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4165 Wilcziek Tracy Edelstein Richard & Roberta Shaughnessy Gerald J 1264 Sibley Memorial Hwy 1206 Culligan Ln 1248 Culligan Ln Mendota Mn 55150 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4101 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4150 NORT ASSOCIATED C• T A 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners(�?,nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Carie Fuhrman/Stephen Grittman DATE: October 21, 2010 MEETING DATE: October 25, 2010 SUBJECT: Wetlands Permit for Fence Installation CASE NO: Case No. 10-31; NAC Case 254.04 — 10.34 APPLICANT(S): Richard Nelson LOCATION: 796 Havenview Court ZONING: R-1 — One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR — Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: Richard Nelson has applied for a Wetlands Permit to install a fence in the rear yard of his property located at 797 Havenview Court. The subject site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The Wetlands Ordinance requires that any land alteration or construction within 100 feet of any designated wetland requires approval of a Wetlands Permit. Analysis: The applicant received approval for a wetlands permit back in 2006 for the restoration of the shoreline and eroded areas in the rear yard of the property. This included landscaping and installation of native Minnesota wildflowers. (The applicant has provided the scope document and photos from the installation and finished product of that project). The applicant is now proposing to install a 4 -foot high vinyl fence in the rear yard. The fence will be of the "Rothbury Concave" style and almond in color with pickets spaced 2- 15/16" apart (see enclosed photo of fence style). The fence is proposed to enclose the rear yard of the property and will contain three 4 -foot wide self -latching gates. The Engineering Department has reviewed this permit request and has suggested that a condition be added upon approval that the area between the fence and wetland edge remain as a buffer area with native vegetation. Fence Standards. Section 12-1 D-6 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for fence construction and location, requiring the following: • A fence permit be obtained for any fence 6 feet or less in height; Comment: This shall be added as a condition upon approval. • All fences shall be located entirely upon the private property of the property owner; Comment: This condition is being met according to the submitted site plan. • No less than 30% of the plane between the ground and the top of the fence shall be open; Comment: This condition appears to be met according to the submitted fence photograph and details. • Fences up to and including 6 feet in height may be erected on interior lot lines behind the front yard setback line and on rear lot lines. Comment: This condition is met as the fence is located behind the front yard setback line and within the rear yard of the parcel. Letter of Intent. According to the letter of intent from the applicant, the fence is to be installed on the property lines and across the upper edge of the hill leading down to Pagel Pond. The letter states that the fence will be set back 50 feet from the wetland area. Wetlands Permit. The Wetlands Ordinance requires that any land alteration or construction within 100 feet of any designated wetland requires approval of a Wetlands Permit. The purpose of the Wetlands Ordinance is to ensure that alterations within the buffer area adjacent to wetlands do not degrade or threaten the water quality of the wetland area and to provide for the protection, preservation, and maintenance of the City's wetlands and water resource related areas. Action Requested: Regarding the request for a Wetlands Permit at 796 Havenview Court, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following options: 2 1. Approval of the Wetlands Permit based on a finding that the proposal will not result in any negative impacts to the wetland and that the request is consistent with the Wetlands Ordinance, subject to the condition that the area between the fence and wetland edge remain as a buffer area with native vegetation and a fence permit be obtained prior to installation. EA 2. Denial of the Wetlands Permit based on a finding that the application is inconsistent with the intent of the Wetlands Ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approval of the requested Wetlands Permit for the installation of the fence as the project will not result in any negative impacts to the wetland. The proposed location of the fence appears to meet the intent of the Wetlands Ordinance and will not degrade or threaten the water quality of the wetland. Supplementary Materials: 1. Application Materials submitted October 4, 2010 2. Site location map N Findings of Fact for Approval Wetlands Permit 796 Havenview Court The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Wetlands Permit: The project meets the intent of the Wetlands Ordinance. 2. The project has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. The grading and vegetation surrounding the pond will be unchanged. 4. The shape of the pond will be unchanged. 4 0 AE I= 796 Havenview Court Site Location Map WaterMetlands /\/ City Roads /�/ Major Roads parcels ®mo®m� Municipal Boundaries e. Of Mendota H ' APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. / & ` - )i Date of Application .00 PV- Pa/G Fee Paid Applicant Name: N4.1.54 I e UO Com PH: &I;- ?I S - CV351 (Last) (First) (M) E -Mail Address: Address: 7f(ofA06NV(EW Cy#47 f 1ZWVaTA*,cWT.f 00"J Iyo (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name: ?116_604 '�Rdt HA(17> L (Last) (First) (M) Address: _'4 H4 ()CNU / cE W coy kr #4,--N 0-P ,4MF1CKrj M /� (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: 7N #4(&N V fez --0 COU P'T Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) �–�-6%/. ar. O�A-- 3I2 i 7a13e u i eu,/ 5*(0t to S '2 R h 4 a m -77V-O-,/ -- eI �A1 0r,� 4 Mt0, 4'T"Cora &I �V — Type of Request: _ Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Wetlands Permit Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Critical Area Permit Comprehensive Plan Amendment Other (attach explanation) Applicable City Ordinance Number Z Section Present Zoning of Property k Present Use ve" . Proposed Zoning of Property L� Proposed Use SF 9cs - hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the aodj nal material are true. v �6 I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the abo; p.erty during daylight hours. Date Received Si ignAture of Owne nt) 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN 55118 ^ (651) 452-1850 ^ PAX (651) 452-8940 www.mendota-heights.com meets-heights.com Richard E. Nelson 796 Havenview Court ]Lot 92 Block #2 Bridgeview Shores Yd Addition City of Mendota Heights/Dakota County] Mendota Heights, MN 55120 October 4t" 2010 To W]ZOnt It May Concern, I wish for Midwest Fence to install a vinyl fence [style "Rothbury Concave" — see enclosed] on my property yet thisall. The dimensions of the installation are outlined on the enclosed estimate from Midwest Fence. My property has been evaluated and received a "wetlands permit" in 2006 [case #06-041 for the landscaping and installation of native Minnesota wildflowers on the hill behind my home, directly on the edge of Pagel Pond [scope document and pictures of installation and finished project enclosed]. The site map of the 1106 project is enclosed and the topographic map should be part of the application for that project. The fence is to be installed on the property lines and across the upper edge of the hill leading down to Pagel Pond [50' set back from pond]. I have enclosed the following: Application for Consideration of Planning Request Application for Permit Check in the amount of $135 I can be reached on my cell [612-735-23311 should any additional information be required. Encl. ��;�• � ou, �,��-��i�� 'sr� ' �� - � - - 1 rt'�+f tom. - a ,.e�`t`�� _ s 1 r •� ,., - „fes � f � � �`-. _ . i � � �. - vim• S rz f� �� ,E -' -J..-t..l` �Y�w5� I i',•r r�s�� _ ^...Tri-. aC-•....... __ b :1-.'^ - F�-'�'u.•fSc rey 1 aao - - T .�'R~� .�,_ z�LZ^-.��..� ��i�M�•� + j...'.^S_ .. �`.�sr .=.... ry"2� i_ � _yn .. - z-..:�^^!C+ /'P-•: - - f -+�' w;,t1-T.!--�'i�.:• .S•v:.'/;''^nS�.9...-�P••-.: -'>R 4 4.-. ,�.,.�, c7 v, :,,. ESi ai,z '� ..•tom{ -i�r it "S r, JJ ��'GG t - "� II t II _ .,� t ,�I!I• 9 I I II h 1 ! 1 Sr47x }. � ISI:!: 1 L i{,{�� I. = I �� .� ':kilr�� f ��f � 1$!' �'� ��• + I: ,i `� °� �'�-1 I 7+ �• � � �� Y �il 1 -,y arST I � tE I I. I.I i" �i I 'j f ' ! II � J 1{�I I� �'F� L7 !I �'� C _ I ��' r��•� 3-,; ,I'" Iii: o � I 1 � � , 1�t, j�:[d ,, � 1 ` I �II• '' �. 11 �; `�� f 1 x {E} ' ( � F,� � ' � � � � o. ! � 1 V 'l! ; �� l I ` i @@ tt•_�.e - �a I I u; � !� I I( i t els I � ,. �. tom; "� I t� � I ` �� ' ' Si• I I � � C� F T'� I ! 1'I��Y +l'•� �I 4 i� �� 1F 1 t ?<� I`'ll _.l ��! £ E� ° - � � 1 ItLi � .5'• I� f + ' Il�,i;� �.3 , h t I ! c•� ��1 ,' Z4. r �.i.-' � I� ' �. I''� 1 I � �' iti L 16 � � i ' � � I � � + 1/'� � !i all vf 01 'o OTT Ila - • � �. � , I , d ,C� y., t�.., � ��1 � �� I L�� :1 � 1 ��I , ? �I I ► !; 1 ,, 1 1 ,i F �I :. [I 1 • " s � 'tf�� LLl .� ' � 1 1 + I t � , . l , l ' ��r4�-� r "�'. r: I I �,� � `s yx .:�1 !i- - Y i a: I1 ` g � ; 6[� I . L I I � 1 h - _. '.:..,-��.. ;� r.�.•.,a,.,-'-". n +; I! y1 �? 4 � G � •Y �..-•-,.�-r--�',- ,,,,,w-�,.,3 ter= , '�", ��•£I�iS�17i� �� 1. II - �_-F.�...I �..�. s. �;r [.. +�-'}1 .- �as�,�,. _,.... � ^�� s rs _._ , . + 1, ,.•�„iS;: �^� ., ... TRADITIONAL A timeless look that's alway in st; le available in 7.1, S11100th finish: 7,.A White Almond CAPE COD CONCAVE/CAPE COD Heights: 3', 4' & 5' Colors: White Picket Style: 3" Pointed Picket Picket Spacing: 2-7/16" YORKSHIRE CONCAVECYORKSHIRE Heights: 3' & 4' Colors: White Picket Style: 3" Dog Ear Picket Picket Spacing: 2-7/16" ROTHBURY CONCAVEIROTHBURY Heights: 4' Colors: White & Almond Picket Style: 3" Dog Ear Picket Picket Spacing: 2-15/16" J ESTIMATE ORDER ANN Ora— ��♦�.► � v�l.�f+�-:-vim 1.r'��`"p�',►��y�� (451) 451-2221 Fax (651) 451-6939 me Gopher State (1) Call ID X464 Ticket -t Nearest Intersecting Street - Hudson Paye # _ Township Hudson Grid # r t Range Corner Loi ❑ Section/Quarter )use dress y rr f ., County State Zip iployer Home Phoned ) b Site Address Work Phone � Work Phone (Spouse) nail: Cell Phone' QUANTITY DESCR IPTION _,1 z%�. y r i ii �• l l i j -71 �.-i i_ Iii t f ,} iA. J - - It Jl. - Down Payment: Check # -redit Card # Amt. Date Expiration Date DP F-] PS ❑ BC n ALL ❑ A SERVICE CHARGE of 11/2% per month (18% pnnuaily) will be applied on all past due balances. The purchaser shall be responsible for any and all collection and legal costs incurred by Midwest Fence in the event of this bill becoming past due. Midwest Fence reserves the right to lien the improved property if payment in full as agreed to in this contract is not received. Date i' ` 20 t Job No. Salesperson " iz• r' ` P' Oy Picture No. Terms: 10% Down 50% Stark Up Balance To Installer on Compieti= Customer Indtiaala tvJ I'- • t � t -.z.. WAtERIA, AND INSTALLATION THIS ESTIP71ATE. VALID FOR 30 TAX D�AIYS FROOM ABOVE DATE T OTti L Owner responsible for establishing correct property and fence lines. Any Permits required shall be the sole responsibility of the owner. Owner responsible for removal of obstructions of every nature which will interfere with the installation of the fence. This contract assumes normal ground conditions. Should rocky or excessive hard digging be g. Co. shall furnish only the material and labor specified in this contract. Any changes made encountered, owner agrees to pay additional costs of such work. Midwest Fences 8 Mf from the above specifications will be billed at Midwest's current retail prices. This order vvill become binding only upon M&, -fest rrenca Managers approval. Customer Signature -, i r` Date Form 2 — Rev. 2-05 Manager Salesperson's Signarure Data Ar tvJ I'- • t � t -.z.. WAtERIA, AND INSTALLATION THIS ESTIP71ATE. VALID FOR 30 TAX D�AIYS FROOM ABOVE DATE T OTti L Owner responsible for establishing correct property and fence lines. Any Permits required shall be the sole responsibility of the owner. Owner responsible for removal of obstructions of every nature which will interfere with the installation of the fence. This contract assumes normal ground conditions. Should rocky or excessive hard digging be g. Co. shall furnish only the material and labor specified in this contract. Any changes made encountered, owner agrees to pay additional costs of such work. Midwest Fences 8 Mf from the above specifications will be billed at Midwest's current retail prices. This order vvill become binding only upon M&, -fest rrenca Managers approval. Customer Signature -, i r` Date Form 2 — Rev. 2-05 Manager Salesperson's Signarure Data APPLICATION FOR PERMIT City of Mendota Heights ....t.. 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 (651) 452-1850 • Fax (651) 452-8940 DIRECTIONS: APPLICANT MUST ES I THROUGH (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) RETURN ALL COPIES 2. DATE OF APPLICATION 1. SITE ADDRESS c &' /' 4:-:7 hd L >> 1010 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (,0T /L, �l' j�l�`+r�Ci I,`il_''`av9C-5 epPi o i i - 'i � C- n u B �p�1 •r ly ?� �2 • � �-ae yy a --.�,° - r ' - f � way; rb � t ", z P ;f•-. - __ - i = y F::•r-� I . d 'r1 '�1•a ts�p-j�^:+,� Y 1,r'f,KJIti''�sJ' s ew i �r 1atrra}r r� �}T. € hvp �ylirfd�lr 41 R. a '+a _ 3 '� ,t it , _. ss�•�"'-`'' f ltd'- E = Y,� A �. �. ,t'd-�� t� r _ e {id4t qo Tv � _ •mss t .!, j � �. h ��. r T'tir !,' , � ,L t ,� y - i' F1•r�t� !�'�£ � c�.. �-F +'f"�G �� t f S I :1-:` d;7� 1�. - _ ,p ,'' �� 3 Ltd . .� •Y 1 � r y y: r ii 1 "hi t � t Ak 44 4W. � � �-`�f1J`'r�,r 6 C5 y it til l VI i 1. i". f� }�trt r � • � { � e �y�'�s _ t P t. - e - t ' I a I'd FM �f sl ��Y 1 a k r ri a_ io Z.,, ARI �r. s s 'M.. 4.46Z_ � tS 1 iQ= t . rrx 11 u4 it h ~Y. r '�fti :,''"� !. X1..7'4 ti't'•.: �: l:.,Y . ,.�\t1 C -:i l..;�4r4�•, y-ti?S:a4: ,,.i -, l:4' 4 --� e - 4 - yT�i� tca -•- �_ ,ete . ih f#4 47-z 3 'Kit S, 7�7 z rsz4a� Richard E. Nelson 796 Havenview Court Mendota Heights, MN 55102 January 4b 2005 Dear Neighbors, My long delayed landscape project is nearing the final stages of approval. I have appeared in Dakota County Court on two occasions and am now in the process of applying for a permit to implement the attached landscape plan. I have sent my proposed plan and project scope to you in advance of a public hearing so you are aware of my intentions up front. Mendota Heights will be placing my project on their public hearing agenda; I am sure that you will be notified of the time and place should you wish to participate. If you have any questions regarding this proposed plan please contact me for clarification. Thank you! Encl. Cc Jim Danielson Steve Grittman William Bernard Sincerely, Rick Nelson Restoration guidelines prepared by: John Garry Using Native Plant Communities to Enhance Your Environment AN OUTLINE OF SUGGESTED PROCEDURES AND MATERIALS TO BE USED TO ESTABLISH NATIVE GRASSES AND WILDFLOWERS FOR THE NELSON RESIDENCE 796 HAVENVIEW COURT - MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN Project Overview: This project consists of restoring the shoreline and eroded areas in the backyard of the Nelson residence in Mendota Heights. The goal is to restore the area and create an ecologically correct landscape that will prevent future erosion and allow for a buffer zone between the waters edge and the lawn. The area is approximately 5,750 SF in size. Currently the site contains some vegetation that will be completely removed including Plum Trees (Prunus sp.) and Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as well as some non-native vegetation that will be transplanted. The project also includes installing native grasses and wildflowers around the exiting trees and waters edge and installing the correct erosion control measure during and after construction. The following is our proposal based on the site design. Site Preparation: The most important aspect of preparing a site for native plant community restoration is to begin with as clean of a seed bed as possible. Removal of non-native vegetation, whether it be bluegrass turf, perennial, biennial or annual weeds or exotic trees and shrubs is often accomplished thru the use of Roundup® herbicide or a combination with other selective herbicides. If necessary, following herbicide die -back, vegetation is typically removed from the project area with the use of controlled burning or mechanical scraping to rid the project area of stalks and stems which may impede proper seedbed preparation. On sites that are exceptionally weedy or have well established old -field or turf growth, two or more herbicide applications along with tillage are often recommended to ensure the best possible seedbed prior to seeding. Once a weed free site has been achieved, a quality seed or planting bed is created using appropriate tillage equipment. The following site specific steps are being recommended to prepare your project for seeding & planting. 1. Removal of material to be transplanted. 2. Installation of 210 linear feet of silt fence around property boarder and waters edge. 3. Conduct site prep herbicide application using Rodeo herbicide. 4. Remove unwanted woody vegetation. 5. Remove unwanted posts in project area. 6. Move boulders to be re -used in final landscape. 7. Prepare soils and final grade by moving eroded soils back to the upland portions of the site. 8. Transplant material specified on plan and install hardwood mulch around plantings. 9. Install boulders from existing landscape as indicated on plans. 10. Seed native seed mixes as per design (see below). 11. Install two sided straw erosion control blanket over all seeded areas. 12. Conduct one year of management on newly installed vegetation. Seed & Seeding: A Native prairie grass seed installations can be conducted in Minnesota during two periods of the year. The first window of opportunity is from the time site preparation work is concluded in the spring, until approximately July 15. The second period is in the fall between September 20 and freeze-up. The latter of the two approaches is considered a dormant seeding. Dormant seedings do not germinate until soil temperatures reach approximately 65° F the following spring. On this project site the seed will be broadcast into the prepared soils and covered with erosion control blanket. Suggested Native Grass & Wildflower Mixes For Dry (Xeric) Sites Where Some Vertical Texture is Desired MNL MIX (G2) - Mid -Height Xeric Prairie Grasses (3 to 4 feet) Big bluestem Andro 0 on erardi 3.0% Side oats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula)........................30.0% Prairie Onion (Allium stellatum).......................................2.0% Blue grama Boutelouagracilis) 10.0% Prairie brome (Bromus kalmii)..........................................6.0% Butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa)..........................6.0% Canada wild rye (Elymus canadensis)...............................10.0% Smooth blue aster (Aster laevis)........................................2.0% Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium)......................37.0% Azure aster Aster oolentan iensis Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans)....................................3.0% Partridge pea (Cassia fasiculata)......................................2.0% Prairie dropseed (Sporobolus heterole is) ........................ 1.0% Suggestedrate/acre......................................................... 12lbs. PLS MNL MIX (F2) - Mid -Height Xeric Wildflowers Fragrant giant hyssop (Agastache foeniculumn) ...............2.0% Prairie Onion (Allium stellatum).......................................2.0% Leadplant (Amorpha canescens).......................................4.0% Butterfly milkweed (Asclepias tuberosa)..........................6.0% Smooth blue aster (Aster laevis)........................................2.0% Azure aster Aster oolentan iensis 2.0% Partridge pea (Cassia fasiculata)......................................2.0% Stiff tickseed (Coreopsis palmata)....................................2.0% Pale purple coneflower (Echinacea pallida) .....................5.0% Creamy gentian (Gentian flavida)...................................1.0% Common ox -eye (Heliopsis helianthoides) .......................5.0% Round headed bush clover (Lespedeza capitata) ..............3.0% Rough blazing star (Liatris aspera)...................................6.0% Dotted blazing star (Liatris punctata)...............................1.0% Wild lupine (Lupinus perennis).........................................4.0% Wild Four -O -Clock (Mirabilis nyctaginea) ......................1.0% Wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa)..................................2.0% Showy penstemon (Penstenion grandiflorus) ...................3.0% White prairie clover (Petalostemum candidum)................12.0% Purple prairie clover (Petalostemum purpureum) .............11.0% Yellow coneflower (Ratibida pinnata)..............................3.0% Black-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta).................................9.0% Stiff goldenrod (Solidago rigida)......................................2.0% Showy goldenrod (Solidago speciosa)..............................2.0% Prairie spiderwort (Tradescantia bracteata) .....................2.0% Hoary vervain (Verbena stricta)........................................5.0% Heart -leaf golden alexanders (Zizia aptera)......................1.0% Suggestedrate/acre..........................................................3 Ibs. PLS Erosion Control: The downhill areas of the site will have silt fence installed at the time of construction. 2. All seeded areas will be covered with two sided straw erosion control blanket. Management: First Growing Season During the first growing season this project will be cut as needed to control annual weed development. First year cuttings are important! Typically annual weed species are very aggressive during a first growing season. If allowed to grow too tall, annual weeds can have an adverse effect on newly emerging native plant species. Other possible management procedures during the first years will include spot spraying herbicide or hand weeding. Subsequent Growing Seasons 1. During the second full growing season and beyond the site should be monitored for persistent weed problems. In years following the second growing season, management services might include controlled burning, spot spraying, spot mowing, and hand weeding. It is of great importance to monitor and care for a native plant community restoration during its developmental period. Beyond first year cuttings management services can be contracted separately from this installation contract. Project Costs: Site Preparation Spraying- per Round -up Application ............................ Silt Fence Installation (210 LF) .................................... Tree Removal, Post Removal, Rock Placement .......... Potting of Shrubs & Perennials ..................................... Grading/Tillage............................................................. Seed ............$220.00 .............$577.50 ..........$1,265.50 ............. $960.00 ..........$2,000.00 Nativegrasses......................................................................... Wildflowers........................................................................... .$140.00 .$252.00 Seeding $1,133.50 Erosion Control Blanket........................................................................$812.50 Planting/Transplanting (120 shrubs & perennials) ..........................$1,930.00 1St Year Management............................................. ................................. $650.00 Total....................................................................................$9,941.00 This quote is good for- 60 days from 12/19/05. Minnesota Native Landscapes Inc. (MNL) reserves all rights to the information contained within this outline/proposal. This information may not disseminate to third parties without written approval, especially other potential bidders. MNL guarantees the successful establishment of its perennial wildflower and grass seeding and planting work after a development period of threefiAl seasons. After tl2is development period passes, if it is determined that our restoration efforts have not been successful, MNL will re -seed and re -plant for the cost of the materials only, labor will be provided at no charge. This guarantee applies only if MNL is sole supplier of labor and material as outlined in this proposal, including maintenance as recommended. It is understood that MNL shall not be held responsible for occurrences outside of its control such as drought, flooding, grazing of wildlife (especially geese) orproperty damage or disturbance caused by others. If the decision is made to have MNL implement this plan, our payment terms are as follows; Payment in full will be due upon completion of installation work as outlined. Any amount remaining unpaid beyond 30 days shall incur a 1112% monthly finance charge. Future maintenance work beyond the first growing seasons work included in this bid will be billed separate as it is completed and will be subject to the same 1112% monthly finance charge. The customer agrees that upon customer's failure to make payment in full in accordance here with, customer agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney fees. Customer Signature Minnesota Native Landscapes, Inc. date I y�� g fig_ h �3e W S i � n Zz W h R E LO � z # I O y�� g fig_ z �3e W II neg N IL U W gg n s LO � z # flu�y2 3n &g� ss g k OOF U) Z p2iU_' `c 8 FSE? w > _ u q �z¢ co3 0& LU B a: O=0 Wcow z rO1— IL Z od gg9 3 z b O ? a Q 0 z <E ry O �3g QW m o O . Q €oEs Z O'd£c b Wuj0 S U Q �oatl3 a 38vb k g'e 2i: ®6 dT. dz 32 ¢ O 6x� b�s c �a LL � m i � b � a � O y�� g z W II neg 3� g5 €-s IL U W gg n # flu�y2 3n &g� ss g k O b U) `c 8 u q co3 0& B Z od b O 3 Q 0 z O �3g OOZO O . Z 0 J F Fn O O'd£c b Wuj0 S 38vb k g'e 2i: ®6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING October 6. 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, October 26, 2010 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Richard Nelson for a Wetlands Permit to construct a fence at the following described property: Lot 2 Block 2 Bridgeview Shores 3rd Addition (PIN #27-15152-020-02) More particularly this property is located at 796 Havenview Court This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 2 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this Wetlands Permit will be heard at this meeting. Nancy J. Bauer Acting City Clerk Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-1850. 796 Havenview Court Dakota Cojinty_ MN uisciaimer map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, Ma Scale appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. 1 inch = 125 feet -- "labels e A fiend alone Eine to i e 1 iplate 51f 00 rind Pawam expose pop-up Edge'.1x d + � n y Brian P & Kara L Pondhaven Ln endota Heights Mn 55120-1692 Stein William Joseph 2465 Westview Terr Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Maurer Eric W 785 Pondhaven Lane Mendota Heights Mn 55120 City Of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Cury Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Dybdal Kevin K & Wendy F. 793 Havenview Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55120 Deslauriers John S & Kathleen 790 Havenview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1800 Hoplin David G & Carol J 769 Havenview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1800 Friel Bernard P & Damaris 750 Mohican Ln Saint Paul Mn 55120-1633 Edwards Kent R & Catherine 810 Hazel Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1626 i urinus John P& Alison S 767 Pondhaven Ln Mendota Heights Mn 55120 Bedekar Ranjan G & Usha R 2481 Bridgeview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1610 Kampa Stephen J & Sherry L 2464 Westview Terr Mendota Heights Mn 55120 Steveken John G & Lisa A 781 Pondhaven Ln Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1692 Quitter Gregory M 799 Havenview Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1800 Nelson Richard E & Mary T 796 Havenview Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1800 Friel Bernard P & Damaris 750 Mohican Lane Saint Paul Mn 55120-1633 Hughes Douglas 778 Havenview Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Walsh Janet C 803 Hazel Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1626 Losleben James P 815 Hazel Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1626 Wallen Daniel B & Nadine 784 Havernview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120 Olsen Steven R 2469 Westview Terr Saint Paul Mn 55120-1699 Yang Yu Kun 2472 Westview Terr Saint Paul Mn 55120-1699 Kolstad William & Jean 775 Pondhaven Ln Saint Paul Mn 55120-1692 Beaty J Scott 800 Havenview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1801 Majewicz Edward & Jadwiga 783 Havenview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1800 Daniel James P 775 Havenview Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1800 Domler Jeffrey R 772 Havenview Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1800 Obrien John F & Sandra A 807 Hazel Ct Saint Paul Mn 55120-1626 Lane Scott 2390 Pagel Rd Saint Paul Mn 55120-1637 Robbins John M & Jane H 2391 Pagel Rd Saint Paul Mn 55120-1638 > a gtfeelct s "rc3�4� = �� C... 9 �� ,art Revli x i@ la, hadhuve afin Cis asy Pe-�VO' Labels i A Rend along line to I AVER1,11"®r, 5116®R' FIZI._.I Paper LIXpose Pop -Up ease 1 5e A4! ��,,v'� Tomplate 600 1. 1 'ersons David G & Theresa A ;14 Hazel Ct faint Paul Mn 55120-1626 :ti quettes faci les a pe�er RejIflez h la hachure afill de NAC NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 753.231.2561 plannersrnacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Bob Kirmis / Stephen Grittman DATE: October 21, 2010 MEETING DATE: October 26, 2010 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Fence Installation CASE NO: Case No. 10-32; NAC Case 254.04 - 10.32 APPLICANT(S): Robert Thompson LOCATION: 979 Caren Road ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR, Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: The applicant, Robert Thompson, is seeking a Critical Area Permit to allow the installation of a fence within the rear yard of his property located at 979 Caren Road. Specifically, the fence is proposed along the west property line of the rear yard area. Fencing, constructed by neighboring property owners, currently exists along the north and east sides of applicant's rear yard. Thus, the proposed fence would result in the full enclosure of the rear yard and allow the applicant's dog to be fully contained. The subject site is zoned R-1, One Family Residential, and is located within the Mississippi River corridor. According to Section 12-3-17 of the Zoning Ordinance, any work conducted within the Mississippi River Corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. Analysis: As noted, the north and east sides of the applicant's rear yard are currently fenced (by neighbors). The applicant wishes to construct a fence along the west side of his rear yard to create full enclosure of the rear yard area. The proposed fence would be constructed of wood (Cedar) and measure four feet in height. No changes to the existing vegetation/landscaping, topography and/or drainage patterns are proposed as a result of the fence construction. The proposed west side yard segment measures 150 feet in length. In addition to the 150 foot long fence segment, the applicant also wishes to construct a nine foot long segment of the east side of his home which would include a gate. Like the primary fence segment, the gate area segment would measure four feet in height. Fence Standards. Section 12-1 D-6 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for fence construction and location. Section 12-1 D-6.B.1.b requires that fences up to and including six feet in height may be erected on interior lot lines behind the front yard setback line and on rear lot lines. Fences are also required to be constructed in such a manner that no less than 30% of the plane between the ground and the top of the fence is open. The applicant indicates that the spacing between the fence slats would be 1 inch, but other details of the fence dimensions are not available. The applicant will need to verify with the building official that the fence as constructed will meet the 30% openness requirement. Critical Area Permit. This property is located within the Mississippi River corridor. Any work conducted within this corridor requires a Critical Area Permit. As a part of this project, no landscaping or paving is being considered, no change in grade is planned, no soil loss is anticipated during construction, and no slopes are being affected. As a result, the project should not have a negative impact on the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. The Critical Area Ordinance recommends the use of natural materials in building and site construction, including wood fencing. Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is guided as LR, Low Density Residential in the 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The fence request is consistent with this land use category, which provides for single family development. Action Requested: After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: Approval of the Critical Area Permit to install a fence, based on the following findings: the fence project shall not involve landscaping, paving, changing in grades, soil loss, or altering of slopes; therefore, it shall not jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area, subject to the following conditions: a) The applicant shall receive a fence permit prior to installation of the fence; and b) The fence shall meet the regulations established in Section 12-1 D-6, including the 30% open design requirement. 2 G 2. Denial of the Critical Area Permit to install a fence, based on the finding that the fence project will negatively impact the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi River corridor critical area. Staff Recommendation: Considering that no landscaping, paving, soil loss, grade or slope alteration is planned, the proposed fence installation should not have a negative impact upon the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi critical area. As a result, Planning Staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit to construct the proposed rear yard fence. Supplementary Materials: 1. Draft Findings for Approval 2. Draft Findings for Denial 3. Application materials dated October 4, 2010 4. Site Location map 3 Draft Findings for Approval Fence Installation in the Critical Area 979 Caren Road The proposed fence will have little or no visual impact on the critical area or surrounding property. 2. The fence will create no issues for grading or erosion. 3. The fence is proposed to have minimal impact on the land as it does not involve landscaping, paving, grade changes, soil loss, or altering of slopes. S Draft Findings for Denial Fence Installation in the Critical Area 979 Caren Road 1. The proposed fence will have a visual impact on the critical area and neighboring property. 2. The installation of the fence has the potential for creating grading and erosion issues. 3. The installation of the fence has the potential for having a substantial impact on the land as it may cause grade changes, soil loss, or the altering of slopes. 5 1015 luzc 1020 1032 1040 1646 1034 1650 1030 1666 1037 1670 1041 991 100 / 132 130 128 126 124 122 120 118 /971 974 a -.1;J 949 978 % �,80 1/ t52 8th 1588 982 154 975 969 z 1633 j 995 991 985 1643 996 1642 1632 649 1645 650 55/1666 992 358 1010 1631 1663 1645 1639 1636 1671 1645 1681 1640 1664 1651 920 1648 1011 1657 1652 101 5 916 1679 1680 1665 1 1660 a 1016 1i t 1670 1675 1012 1008 1678 16 'f- 979 Caren Road Site Location Map Water/Wetlands /\/ City Roads Major Roads parcels �_op0� MunicipalBoundaries 1590 , J 1598 1600 1 1606 1614 1591 115951599 960 1636 1643 1642 1632 649 1645 650 55/1666 1653 358 1644 1663 1645 1650 920 915 1671 1672 1681 Site Location Map Water/Wetlands /\/ City Roads Major Roads parcels �_op0� MunicipalBoundaries 1590 , J 1598 1600 1 1606 1614 1591 115951599 1605 1 919 1632 1638 923, FL 1644 924 1637 1645 1650 920 915 1655 1656 919 1663 1664 920 1669 1670 1 916 1679 1680 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Date of Application sn -V-16 Fee Paid/GAG G'� le,.;� a �,� y ;� Applicant Name: 0 iI%P��O/i PH: (Last) (First) q- (M) �q E -Mail Address. Address: 17OQ �i kd `--`�- r' ate (Zip) (Number & Street) (City) ( ) Owner Name: - (Last) (First) (�) Address: q! ! f? (Number & Street) (City) (tate) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: — - -- Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request: _ Rezoning ---Conditional Use Permit _ Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval __Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number k2 Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit _Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Present Zoning of Property—_21 Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property 2k _Proposed Use Section 3 I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. (Signature of App11 ant) /j j l� Date Received _— Zq- `— (Signature of Owr(er) 1101 Victoria Carve ° Mendota Heights, NN 55118 ® (651) 452-1850 ° FAx (651) 452-8940 www- meundota-heiuhts.com October 4, 2010 City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Letter of Intent: Critical Area Permit to build a fence To whom it may concern, We (Robert and Kathy Thompson) would like to build a fence on the west side of our back yard at 979 Caren Road, Mendota Heights, MN 55118. The east and north sides are already fenced by our neighbors and we would like to finish off the backyard with a fence to contain our 10 pound dachshund dog. Dakota Unlimited is the contractor (Rick Fisher) for this project and the fence is to be constructed of premium cedar wood. This project will not change the vegetation, topography, drainage, landscape or grading in any manner. The fence style will be Lincoln Picket style and will have one inch spacing to offer ample airflow. It will not be a privacy fence, but rather a dog containment fence. It will be top of the line cedar fencing and will add to the look and value of the neighborhood. The fence will be roughly 150 feet along the west property line of our property at 979 Caren Road. The fence will be 4 feet high. We will also put in 9 feet of fence on the east side of the house including a 3.5 foot gate with posts between our garage and our neighbors existing cedar fence. Please call us at 612-414-0395 or 612-710-5111 or 651-633-8142 with any questions. Sincerely, Bob and Kathy Thompson 979 Caren Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 y 1 { ` /12 �p It pmt 9 , Y � mroaa�ner• i ��8"�t ��• ivy � F " { M>Waio�[Cgmlp', k1, J 'IbfY�Y i6 - ' =§- City of 979 Caren Rd�. "N Mendota 0 40 _ Heights September 30, 2010 SCALE IN FEET V .�. 980 E �''� '1/2 OD 5 —r EST. 1986 Work Order # ffice: 651-423-3995D©®®©®®®� 24831 ax: 651-423-3996 umdakotaunlimited.com FENCE. GATE. RAIL. IRON. CUSTOM. J IN License # BC -20131577 15953 Biscayne Avenue West Estimate Date Rosemount, MIN 55068 Order Date JJ- -_CATION ADD S: Installation. begin ASAP. Call BILLING ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT) ame ` yF v a<' Name • . • • . • , .. • " ' ddress�°�,f 2' Address ty ,: C fry 1 . tate A.�1," Zips,51 e gone � s� e ✓' 0 (W�7zo; % City State Contact: Phone: ( ) - Fax: ( Zi p ) - udson Pa e/Grids Cross 9 Street HAIN LINK: Residential: Commercial: Wt. ��iitliill��liiiii■ WOOD:9ZITIMM211I Treated Height: ' alvanized Aluminized Black Brown Green Style: jai's Footage: d ` -fight: Gauge: Footage: Pos s: ` Post Tops: :rminal Size: Line Posts: Top Rail: Support Rails:,,j�,! ,t ,f' Boards: 2 alk Gates: Welded: Y N Board Milling: Walk Gates: "ive Gates: Welded: Y N I Drive Gates: : `/u" Trim Boardsr rLr nOIC unt6n ALL i nHi HrrLY Special Install Date:__ f �—.✓" Combination Job E3 Prop. Pins Visible E) Survey Needed El Private Gas or Elec. El New Deve opment ❑ Pool Haul Dirt $ ❑ Tear Out $ ❑ Dumpster ❑ Sprinkler System* ❑ Latch Type ❑ Yard Condition e of Street N S E W Side of Cross Street N S E W Permit Responsibility: WCustomer ❑ Dakota Unlimited ❑ Not Needed Layout Diagram ly w dll duURlU]Idl maienai arm/or iaoor iurmsnea by Dakota Unlimited, Inc. resulting from customer changes to this agreement. 4SE TAKE NOTICE: (A) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A I AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THE CONTRIBUTIONS (B) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE -IT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR TRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE. ota Unlimited proposes to furnish and install in accordance with the above cifications for the sum of $ y Payment: J ince due upon completion: t Card Master Card Discover Card (Circle one) Jit Card # Exp.: ANCES OVER 15 DAYS WILL HAVE A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% PER MONTH (18% !UAL) OR $2.00 MINIMUM CHARGE. Acceptance of Proposal The price and specifications are satisfactory and acceptable: I/we hereby authorize you to proceed with the work as specified. I/we agree to all terms as outlined. Date Accepte `� by Authorized i Representative This proposal va id for days. BUYER AGREES THAT ALL WARRANTIES ARE VOID IF THE PAYMENT TERMS HEREOF ARE NOT MET. Installation. begin ASAP. Call , • lid■ii■il�ii�iii�ii • . • • . • , .. • " ' lii�iiiiiiiiii�ii • . .. 1110AV _ �iiiii��i�i ,�► l ��iitliill��liiiii■ 1 .,.� ly w dll duURlU]Idl maienai arm/or iaoor iurmsnea by Dakota Unlimited, Inc. resulting from customer changes to this agreement. 4SE TAKE NOTICE: (A) ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A I AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THE CONTRIBUTIONS (B) UNDER MINNESOTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE -IT TO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR TRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE. ota Unlimited proposes to furnish and install in accordance with the above cifications for the sum of $ y Payment: J ince due upon completion: t Card Master Card Discover Card (Circle one) Jit Card # Exp.: ANCES OVER 15 DAYS WILL HAVE A FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% PER MONTH (18% !UAL) OR $2.00 MINIMUM CHARGE. Acceptance of Proposal The price and specifications are satisfactory and acceptable: I/we hereby authorize you to proceed with the work as specified. I/we agree to all terms as outlined. Date Accepte `� by Authorized i Representative This proposal va id for days. BUYER AGREES THAT ALL WARRANTIES ARE VOID IF THE PAYMENT TERMS HEREOF ARE NOT MET. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING October 6. 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, October 26, 2010 in . the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Robert and Katherine Thompson for a Critical Area Permit for a fence located at the following described property: Lot 35 Block 3 & Part of Lot 36 Block 3 Com SW Cor N 75 Ft E 5 Ft to Beg (PIN #27-76402-362-03) More particularly this property is located at 979 Caren Road This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 3 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this Critical Area Permit will be heard at this meeting. Nancy J. Bauer Acting City Clerk Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-1850. n r 57 991 979 Caren Road Dakota Countv, MN W. </x rr.i• Ir • �¢1- ��:3 x �. . I "1115 Cic11 N 955 f — t ry5 t 1`J . • 4Y� T N ` 2J3 149f1 992.._" cc i R ED1 RLI 4J • a, �� 152.. _..2' 7 1Fi314 � �' fiy w ` r 4_ in 'jqJj 36fl Vj 183 f y J1636_= __ = 7�GLO = .: -f ^ � �•� 135 r� 1640 r,re 1 fi4Z F ` i F C 1 Q �f 1649_-7 .` 1 4: 7 1 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, 1 inch = 156 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. •,'f. rf;Y'�f :.' 974 - `i - l7 ,•� . r4" G• r 1, d. `78 4•+;: � f, ti c i „� 15:15 � s 983 ii2' t J 1525 1..1 = 1535?ii'";y _ LP d ^^�� Lr 982 •4 1555. ri 1 ?-'1� �JJ 0 _ v . 1 _ n 20r TG JI 4 }' u t . 9r; -f5 `' l. -j r i 1633 LLi c � 1, I -V9; 9 n � )y 4 . I "1115 Cic11 N 955 f — t ry5 t 1`J . • 4Y� T N ` 2J3 149f1 992.._" cc i R ED1 RLI 4J • a, �� 152.. _..2' 7 1Fi314 � �' fiy w ` r 4_ in 'jqJj 36fl Vj 183 f y J1636_= __ = 7�GLO = .: -f ^ � �•� 135 r� 1640 r,re 1 fi4Z F ` i F C 1 Q �f 1649_-7 .` 1 4: 7 1 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, 1 inch = 156 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Devereaux Dennis M & Susan K Voss Holdings LLC Welsch Matthew & Marc 1633 Victoria Rd S 974 Highway 13 1661 Watson Ave Saint Paul Mn 55118-3659 Lilydale Mn 55118-3602 Saint Paul Mn 55116 Kalal Joseph W Brassard Marjorie J Tste Frisch Gerald E Tste 980 Highway 13 1515 Victoria Rd S 2350 7Th St W Saint Paul Mn 55118-3602 Lilydale Mn 55118 Saint Paul Mn 55116 2825 Langness Gary L & Carol J Burch William E & Nola K Conlan Teresa M 1535 Victoria Rd S 1545 Victoria Rd S 1555 Victoria Rd S Saint Paul Mn 55118-3659 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3659 Lilydale Mn 55118-3659 Ettinger Ronald D & Phyllis P Brassard Marjorie Tste Frisch Gail K Rev Tst 1565 Victoria Rd S 1515 S Victoria Rd 960 Caren Rd Saint Paul Mn 55118-3659 Lillydale Mn 55118 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3681 Husak Leesa M Quinn John J City Of Mendota Heights 980 1/2 Sibley Mem Hwy 978 Sibley Mem Hwy 1101 Victoria Cury Mendota Heights Mn 55118-3602 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-3602 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Frisch Gail K City Of Mendota Heights City Of Mendota Heights 960 Caren Rd 1101 Victoria Cury 1101 Victoria Cury Mendota Heights Mn 55118-3681 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Spurr Barney W & Sherry E Specktor Harold & Anna City Of Mendota Heights 1636 James Rd 1643 Lilac Ln 1101 Victoria Cury Mendota Heights Mn 55118-3641 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3647 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 City Of Mendota Heights Garner Anne C Skadron Nancy M Trste 1101 Victoria Cury 1631 James Rd 992 Caren Ct Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3642 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Bergh George Jr & Maxine Herrmann Kenneth A & Camilla Herrmann Kenneth & Camilla 996 Caren Ct 995 Caren Ct 995 Caren Ct Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Todd Alton C & Sandra M Todd Alton C & Sandra M Kirkland James C 991 Caren Ct 991 Caren Ct 985 Caren Rd Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Saint Paul Mn 55118-3603 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-3623 Stockton Anita I Tste Rnley Steven M Thompson Robert W 969 Caren Rd Sox 64523 979 Caren Rd l Mn 55118-3623 Mendota Heights Mn 55118 It Pau[ Mn 55164 Saint Pau