The URL can be used to link to this page

2010-06-22 Planning Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA June 22, 2010 - 7:00 P.M. 1) Call to Order 2) Roll Call 3) Approval of the Agenda 4) Approval of the May 25, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes 5) Hearings a) Case No. 10-18: Elizabeth Tetzlaff — 995 Diego Lane — Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building. Continued Public Hearing b) Case No. 10-21: Brian and Joanne Mullen— 1122 Orchard Circle - Critical Area Permit for a swimming pool. Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. c) Case No. 10-22: Paster Enterprises (McDonalds Corporation) — 2020 Dodd Road — Conditional Use Permit for a new side-by-side drive thru. Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. 6) Verbal Review 7) Adjourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 651-452-1850 with requests. Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 25, 2010 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, May 25, 2010, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Lally, Commissioners Field, Hennes, McManus, Norton (arrived at 7:01 p.m.), Povolny, and Viksnins (arrived at 7:27 p.m.). Those absent: None. Those present were Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek, Acting Public Works Director/City Engineer Ryan Ruzek, and NAC Planner Stephen Grittman. Minutes were recorded by Carla Wirth. Approval ofApri127 2010, Minutes COMMISSIONER MCMANUS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 27, 2010, AS PRESENTED. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: I (Commissioner Povolny) Hearings PLANNING CASE #10-12 Troy Troje 574 Hiawatha Avenue Application Withdrawn It was noted that the applicant had requested this application be postponed so a survey can be completed. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO POSTPONE CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING CASE #10-12 TO THE JUNE 22, 2010, MEETING. AYES: NAYS: Commissioner Norton arrived at 7:01 p.m. PLANNING CASE #10-14 Clear Wireless, LLC 1850 Eagle Ridge Drive Conditional Use Permit to install wireless equipment on an existing rooftop Planner Stephen Grittman explained that Lawrence Coleman of FMHC Corporation, on behalf of Clear Wireless, LLC, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to mount wireless antennas on the rooftop of the South Ridge Condominium building. He used a map to identify the location of this multifamily building and explained the application to install a cellular antenna on the roof, which already has a T -Mobile antenna. He displayed a site map and noted the location of the two towers and ground equipment area. Mr. Grittman reviewed the ordinance criteria for installation of a tower and advised this proposal meets the height requirement. However, the applicant is required to paint the installation, where visible above the roof line, a color similar to the surrounding area, similar to the T -Mobile installation. Staff recommends approval with a number of conditions including the color, receipt of building permit, and an application signed by the property owner. Fencing around the ground Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 installation will be tacked onto the side of the T -Mobile fence and extend just beyond to the hedges. However, it is recommended the fence completely enclose their installation and match the existing fence. Mr. Grittman stated the applicant needs to abide by all technical regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Since it appears to meet all Zoning Code requirements, staff recommends approval. Commissioner McManus asked if the applicant has received applicable Federal, State, and local licenses. Mr. Grittman stated they did not submit that information but it can be verified with the applicant. Chair Lally advised that a resident had asked about safety issues with towers and if there are any known health issues since this is located within a residential area. Mr. Gritttnan stated this issue has been raised over last few years and staff understands there are no adverse health effects. Larry Coleman, representing Clear Wireless, 7400 Metro Boulevard, #260, Edina, stated this is their third application with Clear Wireless who is developing a network and they will make application for a fourth site in several months. He displayed a rendering depicting the difference in size between their equipment compared to that of other carriers and displayed an aerial photo simulation of the current building to show how it will look following the Clear Wire installation and also the view of the T -Mobile equipment. He noted the existing T -Mobile ground equipment fence enclosure is surrounding by large hedges and they would propose to extend that fence to the hedges since the homeowner association's maintenance staff wants access to maintain the hedges. He pointed out that completely fencing their equipment would not provide additional screening because the hedges already provide full screening. Chair Lally asked if they could fence their equipment and still allow space to maintain the hedges. Mr. Coleman described their lease area is a defined seven feet by seven feet to accommodate their 25 -inch cabinet. Chair Lally stated the fencing is for screening and to keep people away from the equipment. Mr. Coleman stated they are willing to fence the leased area but were trying to accommodate the request of the maintenance staff. Mr. Coleman stated they are willing to paint the equipment the color indicated by staff and have secured all necessary licenses, which he will submit to staff tomorrow. He stated he will obtain a signature on the application from the homeowner's association. Commissioner Field stated the fence request poses a problem because the maintenance staff has made the request to not fully enclose the equipment. However, the maintenance staff is not the applicant nor association owner. Mr. Coleman stated they had proposed a gate in the fence extending to the hedges but can make it a complete box with a gate at the hedges, if so directed. Commissioner Field asked about the option of an open fence that allows children and others to gain access to the equipment. Mr. Grittman agreed that the need for screening ability for this fence is less because of the hedges. He noted that if the property owners were not concerned about their own residents gaining access, he could be persuaded that a full enclosure is not necessary. Commissioner Field asked if this could be approved subject to the signed application and an indication from the property owner that the open fence would be preferred. Commissioner McManus asked if there is any danger to animals or people with the equipment should someone gain access. Mr. Coleman stated their equipment cabinet is designed to be vandal proof, similar to traffic control signal boxes. Chair Lally opened the public hearing. An unidentified resident stated she is the co-owner of the building next door where many elderly live who are afraid of storms and lightening. She asked if the tower will draw lightening or cause problems during a storm. Mr. Coleman stated the tower will be fully grounded. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Lally asked for a motion to close the public hearing. P) Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MCMANUS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 6 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION. 2. THE APPLICATION SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND A LETTER FROM THE ASSOCIATION DEMONSTRATING AGREEMENT FOR THE LOCATION OF THE ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL ALSO BE SUBMITTED. 3. OPTIONAL AND AT THE DISCRETION OF STAFF, FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO SURROUND THE ENTIRE CLEAR WIRELESS GROUND EQUIPMENT LEASE AREA. THE FENCE SHALL BE OF THE SAME HEIGHT AND MATERIAL AS THE EXISTING FENCE LOCATED AROUND THE T -MOBILE GROUND EQUIPMENT. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL ABIDE BY ALL REGULATIONS IN SECTION 12-1J-6 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. Commissioner Field stated he would have liked an indication from the homeowner's association whether they agree with the revision to the fence enclosure. Commissioner McManus noted this is an option that can be used by the property owners at any time and it has been indicated there is no danger. Since it is an issue of aesthetics, he thinks it should be handled by the property owner. Commissioner Norton noted if the property owner wants the enclosure, they can make that a requirement of the lease or build it themselves. AYES 6 NAYS 0 Chair Lally advised the City Council would consider this application at its June 1, 2010, meeting. Commissioner Field stated this is the second case in four months that has included insufficient information and lacked the applicant's signature. He stated this is the last case he will vote to recommend approval, even if he supports the application, if it is not complete and signed by the applicant. Chair Lally agreed with Commissioner Field that it would be easier for the Commission to make its recommendation if the applicant were in attendance instead of the applicant's representative. Commissioner Viksnins arrived at 7:27 p.m. PLANNING CASE #10-15 Marl(Johnson 1646 Mayfield Heights Road Critical Area Permit for a shed Planner Stephen Grittman explained that Mark Johnson is requesting approval of a Critical Area Permit for the construction of a 144 square foot detached accessory building in the rear yard of his property at 1646 Mayfield Heights Road, which is zoned R-1, One Family Residential. Mr. Grittman displayed a site plan to identify the subject parcel and location of the proposed 12 -foot by 12 -foot shed. He advised it meets the Zoning Ordinance 3 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 requirements for size and location but requires a Critical Area Pen -nit because it is located within the Mississippi River Corridor. In this case, there appears to be little, if any, impact to the river corridor by construction of this relatively sinall shed for residential storage. Mr. Grittman stated the application is consistent with the Critical Area Ordinance and staff recommends approval. Mark Johnson, 1646 Mayfield Heights Road, the applicant, stated this accessory structure was designed according to the Code. Commissioner Viksnins asked if any neighbors had commented on the application. Mr. Johnson stated he spoke with the owner of 1650 Mayfield Heights Road and the owner of 1040 Sibley Memorial Highway had no objection since she has a similar shed. Chair Lally opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Lally asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NORTON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CRITICAL AREA PERMIT AS REQUESTED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST FOLLOW THE CITY'S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. AYES NAYS Chair Lally advised the City Council would consider this application at its June 1, 2010, meeting. PLANNING CASE #10-16 Dorothy Haffely 1857 Dodd Road Conditional Use Permit and a Variance to the front yard setback to replace two structures (garage and utility building) with one three -car garage Planner Stephen Grittman explained that Dorothy Haffely is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the construction of a detached garage within the required 30 -foot setback on her property at 1857 Dodd Road. The applicant wishes to replace a two -stall detached garage and utility building with a new, three -stall detached garage measuring 748 square feet in size. Mr. Grittman displayed a site plan to identify the subject property, location of two buildings to be removed and new three -stall garage, which requires a CUP to assure it is within the character of the property and neighborhood. Staff finds the request is within requirements for a CUP and complies with the size requirement. The applicant also requested a Variance for the setback from Willow Lane. Mr. Grittman advised that 30 feet is required and the applicant is requesting a 25 -foot setback, which is where the buildings currently sit. To approve a Variance, the Planning Commission needs to find that there is something on the property that makes it impractical or impossible to place the building in a location that meets the 30 -foot setback. The applicant is seeking to build on the same location as the detached building. Mr. Grittman advised it appears to staff that it is possible to meet the required setback, the requested location is a matter of convenience to the applicant, and a hardship is not present to compel 11 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 approval of the requested Variance. Staff recommends approval of the CUP with the condition that the garage be moved to meet the 30 -foot setback, south about 5 feet, and that the setback Variance not be approved. Chair Lally noted if the garage is moved five feet to meet the setback, there is no need for a Variance. Mr. Grittman stated that is correct and described the different standards for the CUP and Variance. Commissioner Field asked about the square footage of the current garage. It was noted the current buildings are 656 square feet and the new structure would be 748 square feet. Commissioner Viksnins asked if the current garage has a Variance. Mr. Grittman stated it has been in place for a long time and is a legal nonconforming structure. Commissioner Viksnins asked if there is a topographical reason to approve the Variance. Mr. Grittman stated there is not, the lot is fairly flat but it would impact the applicant's garden space. Commissioner Povolny asked about the setback of the home. Mr. Grittman stated it is set back 35 feet. Commissioner McManus asked which direction the house faces. Mr. Grittman stated the house faces north and the proposed garage would have to be moved away from Willow Lane to eliminate the need for a Variance. It was noted the address is from Dodd Road and the setback is 30 feet regardless if from the front yard or side yard. Dorothy Haffely, 1857 Dodd Road, the applicant, stated the garage is off the kitchen and she wants the five-foot Variance because otherwise it would cut the yard in half. She explained that she babysits her grandchildren and does not allow them to play in the front yard alongside Dodd Road. In addition, moving the garage back five feet would make the back yard smaller and cut off her view of the gardens from the deck. Mark Haffely, the applicant's son, pointed out that the proposed garage location does not differ from the location of the existing two buildings. The new building would snatch the house stucco. He used a site plan to point out the location of the deck which will be blocked if the garage is moved back five feet. Chair Lally stated the existing buildings are in the same location as the proposed three -car garage. Mr. Haffely stated that is correct and the driveway will be slightly enlarged to accommodate the third stall. Commissioner Field stated he is always concerned with granting a Variance because a new property owner may not babysit grandchildren yet the building would be so located. He asked if using the existing slabs would avoid the need for a Variance. Mr. Grittman stated that the existing construction is relevant to the placement of the future garage and to distinguish this application from future applications. Mr. Haffely advised that the cement slab is 50 years old and not useable. Chair Lally stated it is a case of replacing an existing legally nonconforming use. Commissioner Field stated that once the slab is removed, it is no longer an existing legally nonconforming use. Mr. Haffely stated the other option is to leave the existing buildings, which are an eyesore. Chair Lally stated they are legally nonconforming uses until they have "lived their life" and are removed. The Planning Commission's challenge is to find a hardship in order to consider approval of a Variance. He stated he does not know whether the placement of the existing deck would result in a hardship if the garage is shifted five feet farther back due to loss of current views. Commissioner Hennes asked about the location of the gardens. Mr. Haffely used a site plan to identify the location of the existing gardens and trees. Commissioner Hennes noted that if sitting on the deck, you could still look to the southwest if the garage is shifted back five feet. Mr. Haffely clarified that is not the case because the relative angle will completely block the view and the deck cannot be relocated due to the location of the porch. 5 Plmining Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Ms. Haffely stated she has lived in this house for 37 years. Commissioner Viksnins asked what is located to the south of the structures. Mr. Haffely stated there are gardens and lawn behind the existing buildings that would be removed and relocated. Commissioner Povolny asked what is the actual hardship, noting it cannot be personal or financial. Mr. Haffely stated resale of the house would be higher if there is a view from the deck. He noted this is almost an acre of land and more than half could not be viewed if the garage is moved back five feet. Mr. Haffely stated if the Variance is not approved, the existing buildings will remain and be repaired. Commissioner McManus stated he understands the buildings are very old. Mr. Haffely stated the structure is built directly on the slab so water is causing the base plates to deteriorate and the stucco to crack and yellow. However, if needed, he can replace the base plates. Ms. Haffely explained that in the winter, the snow melts and runs into the garage and freezes. Commissioner McManus stated from an aesthetic point, he would like the buildings replaced. However, the Variance cannot be considered without the existence of a hardship. Commissioner Hennes stated he finds the Variance process to be very inflexible, noted the applicant has lived in this home for 37 years and wants to improve her property. Commissioner McManus asked what could be done with the garage so it remains an existing legally non- conforming structure. Mr. Grittman stated it can be removed and replaced, but not expanded. Mr. Haffely stated he called staff several times and was told that if the slab or building are removed, the building location has to conform to the required setback. Commissioner Field stated he has also seen cases where part of the old foundation has to remain to eliminate the need for a Variance. Mr. Grittman agreed that used to be the case but Variance regulations have changed and the current law is that you can remove the entire nonconforming structure and replace it as long as it is done within six months and is not expanded. Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek stated the expanded area needs the Variance so if that (expanded) area is setback, it would be compliant with State law. Commissioner Povolny noted this is a nice flat lot and if the proposed garage is moved back five feet and west 15 feet, it would retain the view from the deck. It was noted that the driveway would then have to be removed and relocated. Chair Lally stated the options are to move the entire garage back five feet, construct only a two -car garage on the existing slab, construct a three -stall garage with the third stall set back, or construct a three -stall garage that is set back five feet but also westerly to open the view. Commissioner McManus asked about the option to tear down the shed and relocated it. Ms. Haffely stated his mother would like to have only one building. Chair Lally noted hardships may be the placement of the existing deck, moving the garage back five feet would severely diminish the use of the deck, and the existing driveway is off Willow Lane, moving the garage 15 feet to the west would require the driveway to be replaced, and it is likely that street access would not change. Mr. Haffely stated if the garage is moved to the west it would impact two very large 60 -year-old Silver Maple Trees Chair Lally opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Lally asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Planning Convnission Minutes May 25, 2010 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 The Planning Commission agreed to consider the CUP and Variance requests separately. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE DETACHED GARAGE SHALL BE LOCATED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. 2. AN UPDATED SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. 3. THE DETACHED GARAGE SHALL MATCH THE HOME IN COLOR AND MATERIALS. Mr. Grittman suggested the Variance request be considered first since a condition of the CUP is to comply with setback requirements. Commissioner Field withdrew his motion from the floor and Commissioner Hennes removed his second to that motion. COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER POVOLNY, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE AS REQUESTED, BASED ON THE HARDSHIP WITH THE PROPERTY IN ITS TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE DETACHED GARAGE SHALL MATCH THE HOME IN COLOR AND MATERIALS. 2. THE ACTUAL SETBACK OF THE EXISTING GARAGE SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. Commissioner Field noted everything was constructed around the location of the deck and porch Commissioner Hennes stated the applicant is requesting to rebuild on the same site but the new building is obviously larger. Commissioner Povolny pointed out that the existing buildings were constructed in 1948 and, at that time, Willow Lane may have been a one -lane dirt road. However, now Willow Lane has a regular road width. He stated he does not believe allowing a five foot Variance results in a negative impact. Commissioner Hennes stated he cannot support a Variance since no hardship has been found and it relates to an aesthetic issue to view the garden and have continuity of the yard. Commissioner McManus explained that he supports the project because it will improve the area; however, will withhold his vote because he believed the request did not meet the requirement of hardship. Chair Lally stated he thinks the applicants have looked at all alternatives and found that none will work. He stated he can support the finding of hardship since the application involves a combination of replacing the two -stall garage and attached utility shed with a three -stall garage in the same location, the requested location would allow use of the deck, and due to the limitations surrounding the current access to Willow Lane. Commissioner Hennes stated he thinks there are enough findings to support a Variance. 7 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Commissioner Field asked about input from neighbors. Mr. Grittman stated none provided commented. Commissioner Povolny stated the existing buildings are old and now the Willow Lane is wider so the 30 -foot setback is no longer there. He pointed out this is a nice clean property and this would be an improvement. AYES 4 NAYS 2 (Commissioners Norton and Viksnins) ABSTAIN 1 (Commissioner McManus) Commissioner Field noted that several months ago, the Planning Commission considered an application where the road condition had changed. Mr. Grittman asked whether Variance approval is to construct the new building at the existing building setback. The Planning Commission indicated that is correct. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED, AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. AN UPDATED SITE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. 2. THE DETACHED GARAGE SHALL MATCH THE HOME IN COLOR AND MATERIALS. Commissioner Viksnins stated that while he has no objection to the construction of a three -stall garage, he does not support the location since it is not consistent with the required setback. Commissioner Field stated that is why he had supported considering the CUP prior to the Variance. AYES 4 NAYS 2 (Commissioners Norton and Viksnins) ABSTAIN 1 (Commissioner McManus) Chair Lally advised the City Council would consider this application at its June 1, 2010, meeting. PLANNING CASE #10-17 Crystal and Tracy Crocker 665 Hidden Creek Trail Wetlands Permit to plant two Weeping Willow Trees Planner Stephen Grittman explained that Crystal and Tracy Crocker are requesting approval of a Wetlands Permit to plant two Weeping Willow Trees in the rear yard at 665 Hidden Creek, which is within the required 70 -foot wetland buffer. He displayed a site plan to identify the subject site, noting the property is zoned R -IA, One Family Residential, and guided for RR, Rural Residential. Mr. Grittman stated this applicant received a Wetland Permit to allow for improvements within 100 feet of the existing wetland. Staff had reviewed that application to make sure the nature of the improvement did not negatively impact the function of the wetland. That permit was approved and specific to a landscape plan. Mr. Grittman advised that the applicants have now proposed to slightly amend the landscape plan to accommodate two additional tree plantings. Mr. Grittman presented the landscaping plan and noted the location of the two trees on the northwest corner of the property that will screen activity in the rear portion of their yard. Staff feels the plants will survive given the soil conditions, the planting would present little or no impact to the wetland function, and is compliant with the City's wetland regulations. Commissioner Viksnins asked how close this is to the wetland and how much soil will be moved to plant the two trees. Mr. Grittman stated it is within about 50 feet of the wetland. Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Crystal Crocker, 665 Hidden Creek Trail, the applicant, stated they have four children, a pool, and active back yard. She advised that Oak Trees on the property to the west were removed, which opened the view so people can see into their back yard from the hill. Ms. Crocker assured the Planning Commission that they want to keep the wetland healthy and believe Willow Trees will do that and grow fast. She explained that their tree contractor has Willow Trees from three inches in diameter to ten feet high. Commissioner Viksnins asked about the degree of the slope. Ms. Crocker explained there is a gradual slope and the buckthorn is very thick so some was cleared to snake room for the trees. There is reed grass on the other side of the buckthorns and the tree contractor has indicated the tree planting will result in very little disruption. Commissioner Field stated it is his driveway that goes up the hill. Ms. Crocker stated they would like to remove some of the buckthorn and replace it with native plantings. Commissioner Field stated it is unfortunate the Oak Tree was removed and agreed that a Willow Tree is the perfect species to plant in a wetland. Chair Lally opened the public hearing. Seeing no one corning forward wishing to speak, Chair Lally asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MCMANUS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE WETLANDS PERMIT AS REQUESTED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST FOLLOW THE CITY'S LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. Commissioner Field stated he has been a bit contentious about approving Wetland Permits but in this case, it is good stewardship and he supports the motion. AYES NAYS Chair Lally advised the City Council would consider this application at its June 1, 2010, meeting. PLANNING CASE 410-18 Elizabeth Tetzlaff 995 Diego Lane Conditional Use Permit for a 10 -foot x 20 -foot shed Planner Stephen Grittman explained that Elizabeth Tetzlaff is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a detached accessory building on their property at 995 Diego Lane that is over 144 square feet on a parcel that is less than four acres in size. The proposed 200 square foot, 10 feet by 20 feet, accessory building will be utilized as a storage outbuilding. Mr. Grittman noted that the applicant proposes a building that by size is construed to be a garage but will have a utility door so it could not be used to store cars and will be a storage building by design. To meet guidelines that the structure is a reasonable use of the property and will not impose on neighboring properties, the applicant has suggested building materials that are consistent with the single-family home. Staff has found that the building is consistent with the CUP standards if it is set back ten feet from the westerly property line and recommends approval. 0 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Commissioner McManus asked if the setback is from the side yard or back yard. Mr. Grittman stated the requirement for a building of this size is ten feet from any side or rear lot line and a five-foot setback is proposed. Commissioner Hennes asked if they looked at the concept of a ten -foot setback recommendation. Elizabeth Tetzlaff, 995 Diego Lane, stated they requested a five-foot setback so the shed does not obstruct anyone's view and they will plant tall shrubs along side to provide screening. She noted if the shed is required to be set back ten feet, it will impact a large Ash Tree. Dan Stoven, 995 Diego Lane, stated when they made application, staff said the setback requirement was five feet to the side lot line and ten feet to back lot line. Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek stated he misinformed the applicants because he forgot that if the structure is over 144 square feet, it is required to have a ten - foot setback to both lot lines. A five foot setback, as being requested, would require a Variance. Ms. Tetzlaff stated they proposed to construct a 10 -foot by 20 -foot shed instead of a 20 -foot by 20 -foot shed to protect the view and not impact trees. Chair Lally asked if a different sized shed would work since it would not impact the Ash Trees or need a Variance. Commissioner Norton explained the need for a Variance application which would not be considered until next month and have to meet the hardship requirement. Commissioner Povolny asked if a slab will be under the building. Mr. Stova stated there will be a slab but they will also have a Class V base. With the five-foot setback they will be 17 feet from the 50 -year-old Ash Tree that has a higher root system. In addition, there is a Maple Tree at the same distance. Commissioner Viksnins noted the applicant has not made a Variance application so the consideration tonight is for a CUP. Mr. Grittman stated that is correct. Commissioner Viksnins stated if approved tonight, the setback requirement would have to be met. Commissioner Norton asked if they want to stay with the same size building and location. Ms. Tetzlaff answered in the affirmative because she does not want to block a view or impact the trees. It was noted the CUP can be considered tonight and the Variance considered next month. Commissioner Povolny stated a preference to consider both the CUP and Variance at the same time. Mr. Sedlacek advised that the Variance application fee is $100 to cover staff time. Commissioner McManus noted the building configuration could change, retain 200 square feet, yet met setbacks. Mr. Stoven stated that is why they applied for a 10 -foot wide building, because otherwise it will impact the tree's root system. Chair Lally recapped that with a 144 -square foot shed a CUP and Variance are not needed. If the structure is larger than 144 -square feet, a CUP is needed. If the structure is located too close to the lot line, a Variance is needed. Chair Lally stated if the application is for a 10 -foot by 20 foot shed located five feet off the property lot line, then it would be easier to layover this application to the June meeting and deal with both requests at the same meeting. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED TO POSTPONE CONSIDERATION AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE JUNE 22, 2010, MEETING. Commissioner McManus requested that residents in attendance be allowed to speak to the application prior to postponement. Commissioner Field withdrew his motion from the floor. 10 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Chair Lally opened the public hearing. John Murphy, 547 Winston Court, stated he is the neighbor to the west and requested that the CUP and Variance be denied. He displayed pictures of his garage and the proposed building location. He explained that he and the applicant's father had talked about planting three trees between their property line and he had measured the base of the trees which is usually 12 feet or wider to assure egress between the two properties. Mr. Murphy detailed the utility companies that have often used the ten -foot easement and expressed concern that the proposed building would block access to the ten -foot utility easement. Commissioner Field asked about the utility easement on the property line. Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Ruzek stated the easement is five feet on each property for a total of ten feet and is probably a platted easement. Commissioner Field noted if access is needed, the applicant would be required to move the shed at their own expense. Mr. Murphy stated he does not want a building of this large size because it will not enhance his property. He believed the applicant wanted to build this shed on his side because the other side has a big porch and looks nice. He displayed pictures of the beautiful Evergreen Trees that would be cut down to make room for the proposed shed. Mr. Murphy asked about egress to the shed, and displayed a picture showing the applicant's deck, the two trees they mentioned, and their garden. He stated he has no argument with the applicant about the appearance of their property but thinks the Evergreen Trees look nicer than the two trees they don't want to impact. Commissioner Field asked if the Evergreen Trees will be removed if the shed is approved. Mr. Murphy stated that is his understanding. Commissioner Viksnins asked if the concern is the view or location of the shed. Mr. Murphy stated it is both and he believed there were other locations for this shed. Commissioner Hennes asked if he would still object if the shed is 144 square feet with a ten -foot setback, noting it would need no City approvals. Mr. Murphy stated he would still object. Chair Lally asked if he would support approval if the Evergreen Trees are maintained. Mr. Murphy stated he would be more comfortable but still does not want to see a building this size. He displayed as picture of the back of his house, noting the small deck, garage, Evergreen Trees, telephone poles, and stated a large storage building would not enhance his property. Commissioner Norton stated the applicant has property rights that the City has no control over and one may be a building of this size if it meets setback requirements. Mr. Murphy asked if there has to be a legal need for the use before it is approved. Chair Lally explained that with a Variance consideration, a hardship must be proven. But, with a CUP consideration, if the conditions are met it is a permitted use. With this application, the size requires a CUP and the placement too close to the lot line requires a Variance. However, if the building is 144 square feet, then no permits are required. Mr. Murphy stated it is a hardship for him and he does not support this application. He asked if a survey is required for this application since no one knows the exact location of the property line. Chair Lally stated that would be the obligation of the person constructing the building. Commissioner Field noted the City has a metal detector that a resident can borrow to identify survey stakes, if desired. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NORTON, TO POSTPONE CONSIDERATION AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE JUNE 22, 2010, MEETING. 11 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 AYES 7 NAYS 0 Chair Lally advised the applicants of their options and that this matter will be considered again by the Planning Commission at its June 22, 2010, meeting. Mr. Grittman stated if vegetation is relevant to the Commission's considerations he would request the applicant submit a site plan identifying the location of the trees. Commissioner Povolny asked if the five-foot utility easement is a consideration. Commissioner Field noted that by State Statutes, every property has a five-foot easement. Mr. Grittman stated as long as the building is off the easement, they have maintained the rights of the easement holder. PLANNING CASE 910-19 William Stein 2465 Westview Terrace Wetlands Permit to install a ground source heat pump Planner Stephen Grittman explained that William Stein is requesting approval of a Wetlands Permit to install a ground source heat pump at 2465 Westview Terrace, a property zoned R-1, One Family Residential, and guided as Low Density Residential. He noted that at a previous meeting, the Planning Commission had considered the installation of a ground source heat pump and expressed interest in additional information related to the installation. The applicant is requesting reconsideration of the Permit and indicated they will do some reshaping of the rear yard, maintain the mound portion of the back yard, and re -grade it slightly to lower the height of the mound. Additional landscaping information was requested and is in process. Mr. Grittman advised that staff believes the installation of the heat pump is consistent with the requirements of the Wetland Ordinance and would have very little impact on the function of the wetland. In addition, the project would result in restoration of the existing topography and vegetation is consistent. Mr. Grittman stated staff recommends approval with conditions including submission of additional information on the landscaping. Chair Lally asked if the installation of the ground source heat pump is not an impact to the wetland but a question remains regarding whether the landscaping will preserve or degrade from the wetland. Mr. Grittman stated the heat pump would not impact the wetland since the ground will be restored. However, it now appears the ground will be restored to some other landscape than currently exists. Commissioner Field stated that the Planning Commission usually allows staff to deal with compliance of the final landscape plan. Mr. Grittman stated staff is comfortable working with the applicant on the final landscaping. Commissioner McManus asked if there will be no impact from this project. Mr. Grittman answered in the affirmative and explained that staff wants to see additional detail on landscaping within the 100 -foot wetland buffer. Commissioner McManus asked if the Planning Commission typically relies on staff to assure landscaping is adequate. Mr. Grittman stated that has been the common practice when additional buffering or landscaping has been requested. William Stein, 2465 Westview Terrace, the applicant, apologized for not being able to attend at the last meeting to answer the Commission's questions. He reviewed geothermal heat systems and cost savings, and advised that Federal and State cost incentives make it more affordable so the timing is good. Mr. Stein stated the trench will be 125 feet long, 18 feet wide and 8 feet deep and will be "slinky" coiled pipe that lies flat to the bottom of the trench. Commissioner McManus asked about the landscaping. Mr. Stein stated the geothermal system is costly so they propose minimal landscaping with regrading to the same topography and changing turf areas to mulch with native plantings. He used a site plan to identify the location of the fence and grass areas that used to be mowed but are now left unmowed and natural. He stated they would like to reduce the amount of turf to create more area for perennials. They do not plan pavers or hard landscaping at this point. 12 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 Commissioner Norton asked if the contractor is present. Mr. Stein stated he is not present. Commissioner Norton asked if the system can be put in the pond. Mr. Stein stated it cannot because the system needs a minimum depth of six feet and the average depth of the pond is 5.9 feet. Chair Lally opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Lally asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NORTON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE WETLANDS PERMIT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE PROPOSED RESULTING CONTOURS BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. 2. A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY STAFF. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION/EXCAVATION WORK MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PLATTED EASEMENT AREA. 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST FOLLOW THE LAND DISTURBANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Chair Lally advised the City Council would consider this application at its June 1, 2010, meeting. Verbal Review Mr. Sedlacek gave the following verbal review: PLANNING CASE #10-07 Aaron and Sarah Macke Critical Area Pen -nit Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission, PLANNING CASE #10-08 Hayley Heidelberg and Roy Bester Conditional Use Permit Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE 410-09 Karen Pimentel Conditional Use Permit • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-10 Maureen Haggerty Wetlands Permit • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE 910-11 Julie Rosga Conditional Use Permit • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. PLANNING CASE #10-12 City of Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance Amendment Withdrawn until FEMA provides new map in June of 2011. As requested by Commissioner Field, Mr. Sedlacek provided an update on Mendota Plaza and reconfiguration of the McDonald's drive through that will require a Conditional Use Pen -nit. COMMISSIONER NORTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER FIELD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:08 P.M. 13 Planning Commission Minutes May 25, 2010 AYES NAYS Respectfully submitted, Carla Wirth, Recording Secretary 14 FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administra"r .' SUBJECT: 10-18: Conditional Use Permit, Tetzloff Discussion At the May 25 Planning Commission meeting Elizabeth Tetzloff made application for a conditional use permit for an accessory building larger than 144 square feet. It was realized through discussion that the project, as proposed, also requires a variance to the rear yard setback. The Ms. Tetzloff expressed her intent to request a variance for consideration at the June Planning Commission meeting. The application for a conditional use permit was tabled for one month, so the applicant could complete an application for variance before the June planning submission deadline. Ms. Tetzloff did not submit the variance application before the deadline for June consideration, but has expressed her intent to request the variance to staff. Recommendation Staff recommends tabling the application for one more month, which would require an extension of the 60 day review period. Action Required If the commission wishes to implement the recommendation, they may pass a motion tabling planning case 10-18 to July 27, and extending the 60 day review period, making any changes the commission deems appropriate. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners @ Dnacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Carie Fuhrman/Stephen W. Grittman DATE: June 17, 2010 MEETING DATE: June 22, 2010 SUBJECT: Critical Area Permit for Swimming Pool and Fence Installation CASE NO: Case No. 10-21; NAC Case 254.04 — 10.20 APPLICANT(S): Brian and Joanne Mullen LOCATION: 1122 Orchard Circle ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR — Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: The applicants are seeking approval of a Critical Area Permit in order to install an in - ground swimming pool, concrete patio, and fence in the rear yard of their property. The property is located at 1122 Orchard Circle, is zoned R-1, One Family Residential, and is located within the Mississippi River corridor. According to Section 12-3-17 of the Zoning Ordinance, any work conducted within the Mississippi River Area Corridor (MRCA) requires a Critical Area Permit. This typically includes any building or land alterations. Analysis; The property owners are proposing to install an in -ground swimming pool in the rear yard of their property. A concrete patio is also planned to be installed surrounding the pool, along with a 5 foot black aluminum fence. Swimming Pool Standards. The applicants are proposing an 800 square foot (20 ft by 40 ft) in -ground swimming pool behind their home. The pool is proposed to be setback about 21 feet from the east property line and contain a powered safety cover with the motor on the south side of the pool. The pool equipment is proposed to be located near the southwest corner of the home. Private swimming pools are a permitted accessory use in the R-1, One Family Residential District. A concrete pad is proposed to surround the pool on all four sides. According to the site plan, the concrete shall total 1,197.55 square feet. The total percentage of impervious surface is proposed to equal 22%. A breakdown of the proposed impervious surface on the lot is indicated below: Item Area House and Garage 2,607.28 SF Driveway 804.75 SF Sidewalk 188.07 SF Pool Concrete 1,197.55 SF Total Impervious Surface 4,797.65 SF % Impervious Surface 22% 4,797.65 SF/ 21,708.90 SF Fence Standards. The applicants are proposing a five-foot tall black aluminum fence to surround the pool and concrete area in the rear yard (see attached site plan and attached fence picture). The fence is planned to contain two self -latching gates — one on the north and one on the south side of the pool area and shall be 189.25 feet in length. Section 12-1D-6 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for fence construction and location, requiring the following: • A fence permit be obtained for any fence six feet (6) or less in height; Comment: This shall be added as a condition upon approval. • All fences shall be located entirely upon the private property of the property owner; Comment: This condition is being met according to the submitted site plan. • No less than 30% of the plane between the ground and the top of the fence shall be open; Comment: This condition appears to be met according to the submitted fence photograph. • Fences up to and including 6 feet in height may be erected on interior lot lines behind the front yard setback line and on rear lot lines. Comment: This condition is met as the fence is located behind the front yard setback line and within the rear yard of the parcel. Critical Area Permit. This property is located within the Mississippi River corridor. Any work conducted within this corridor requires a Critical Area Permit as special guidelines have been adopted to protect and improve the River's natural, cultural, historic, and recreational resources in this area. 151 It is evident that the proposed project will have some impact on the land as it involves the excavation of an 800 square foot in -ground pool, along with the addition of nearly 1,200 square feet in impervious surface. The amount of dirt being excavated has not been provided by the applicant, but they have indicated that the dirt will be used in the landscaping and existing gardens. Although the parcel is not adjacent to the bluff and the lot is relatively flat, it appears that the proposed work will likely create some changes to the grading of the site and may ultimately have an impact on the condition of the land in the Critical Area. Staff would suggest a more detailed analysis be performed in regards to the proposed grading changes, any altering of slopes, and stormwater runoff. The City Engineer may wish to review the improvements and make any additional recommendations for drainage and soil erosion control necessary to ensure that the project has no impact on the area. Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is guided as LR — Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Installation of a fence and swimming pool for residential use appears to be in compliance with this land use designation, which provides for single family development. Letter of Intent. According to the property owner, the pool is being placed in between the existing trees on the property and so no trees will be destroyed or removed. The applicants own the parcel to the northwest of their home, and so it is planned to have the contractors utilize that parcel to enter and exit the site. According to the applicant, no trees, plants, or other flora or fauna will be displaced, removed, or destroyed; no "unique" plant and animal species will be displaced or removed; and all perennials that the applicants have planted and maintained over the years will be replanted and utilized in the backyard as landscape materials. Action Requested: After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: 1. Approval of the Critical Area Permit for installation of a swimming pool, concrete patio, and fence, based on the attached draft findings of fact and subject to the following conditions: � a. A more detailed analysis shall be performed in regards to the proposed grading changes, altering of slopes, and stormwater runoff. b. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. C. Any recommendations suggested by the City Engineer for drainage and soil erosion control necessary to ensure that the project has no impact on the area. d. A fence permit shall be submitted and approved prior to fence installation. e. A building permit shall be submitted and approved prior to construction work on the swimming pool and patio area. 3 2. Denial of the Critical Area Permit for installation of the swimming pool, concrete patio, and fence, based on the attached draft findings of fact. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approval of the Critical Area Permit for installation of an in - ground swimming pool, concrete patio, and fence. As long as the suggested conditions are met, and the project is approved by the City Engineer, it appears that the project will not have a negative impact on the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi Critical Area. Supplementary Materials: 1. Application materials dated 05-28-10 2. Site location map 11 Draft Findings of fact for Approval Swimming Pool & Fence Installation in the Critical Area 1122 Orchard Circle The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Critical Area Permit: 1. The swimming pool and fence will have little or no visual impact on the Critical Area or surrounding property. 2. The project will not create issues for grading or erosion. 3. The project will have minimal impact on the land as the project does not involve grade changes, significant soil loss, or altering of steep slopes. 4. The construction will not jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi Critical Area. 5 . Draft Findings of Fact for Denial Swimming Pool & Fence Installation in the Critical Area 1122 Orchard Circle The following Findings of Fact are made in support of denial of the above Critical Area Permit: 1. The installation of the pool and fence will have a negative visual impact on the Critical Area or surrounding property. 2. The project shall create issues for grading and erosion. 3. The pool and fence will have major impacts on the land through grade changes, soil loss, and altering of slopes. 4. The project will jeopardize the aesthetic integrity and natural environment of the Mississippi Critical Area. Ic Site Location Map ?� Water/Wetlands City Roads Major Roads U parcels ®... �r MunicipalBoundaries CRY W Mendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. Z Date of Application ,5 Fee Paid U Applicant Name:�PUS �_ PH: 6L, (y ?`J Paeq ( (M) E -Mail Address: I �� ir` t.f Address: � 2. � �.�'� � 1•fMevk Jo� � '� SA � - (Number & Street) (City) (S' e) (Zip) Owner Name: Y� (Last) (First) Address:122- r"' 31 11�= (Number & Street) (Ci Street Location of Property in Question: Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Comp 9 Type of Request: Ni''..1 Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval _Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number t2 r E (M) (St te) (Zip) i' A _ to Leg I from Title or Deed must be provied) I I f '�' i t n, I . - Al Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit X- Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section 2 Present Zoning of Property 2t Present Use �I Proposed Zoning of Property r—I Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. (Signature of Applicanq r Date Received -" (Signature of Owner 1101 Victoria Curve a Mendota Heights, MIN 55118 0 (651) 1452-1850 o PAX (651) 452-8940 www.mendota-heights.com JOANNE JIRIK MULLEN ATTORNEY AT LAW 1 122 ORCHARD CIRCLE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 May 27t' 2010 City of Mendota Heights Planning Commission 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Application for Consideration of Planning Request Lot 4, Block 2, Vals Addition Parcel # 27-81275-040-02 Dear Planning Commission; My husband, Brian Mullen and I, are planning to put in a below ground swimming pool at our property at 1122 Orchard Circle, Mendota Heights, Mn 55118. We plan to place the pool in our backyard (see attached documents) and in doing so, will not intentionally destroy, cut down or remove trees on the property. In fact our goal is to place the pool between the existing trees on the property_ Since we also own the adjoining property, Vals Addition, Lot 6, Block 2, Parcel # 2781275-060-02, we will utilize that property for entrance and egress of the pool builders and landscapers. No trees, plants or other flora or fauna will be displaced, removed or destroyed All perennials that we have planted and maintained over the years will be replanted and utilized in the backyard as landscape materials_ There are no "unique" plant and animal species that will be displaced or removed. We will be surrounding the pool with a five foot black aluminum decorative fence (see attachment), and will be using the dirt dug from the pool in our landscaping and existing gardens. You will see from the diagram attached the drainage direction. When not in use, the pool will be covered with a "Coverstar" powered safety cover. If you have additional questions, or need any other supporting documentation, do not hesitate to contact me immediately. Otherwise we look forward to presenting our plan at the public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission on Tuesday June 22nd 20'10_ Very truly yours, a �r Joanne Jirik Mullen Enc. PHONE: (651) 688-2757 • FAx: (651) 688-2757 • E-MAIL: jbmullen@comcast.net 1122 Orchard Circle May 24, 2010 City of Mendota &A &A & Al Heights w 4illill :7 ki d l � tZ nt s i • Y ,4 FID,. .�.'' PRIIE �� ; i r �yyj i Lot = 21,708.90 sq. ft. House & Garage = 2607.28 sq. ft Driveway = 804.75 sq. ft. Sidewalk = 188.07 sq. ft. Pool Concrete= 1197.55 sq. ft. ImperviousSurface = 22%'" Driveway IEauiomentl Self Latching Gate House Concrete= 1,197.55 sq.ft. Fence = 189.25 ft. Valley Pools & Spas Customer: Mullen Scale: 1"=20' Date: 11-6-09 Revised: 5-21-10 •� 1 Self Latchina Gate IDivinq Board (Auto Cover .... . ...... ............ 81 C3 I, Not A PPROV ;:'D i4 I, -,NSF•.. Snap -In Weir Adjusts Autornaticall 4%" PIPS DESCRIPTION Variation in Nva -ter -Level SIZE jz Heavy duty body, frame and integral Flo -Control Slide Plate Complete with gaskets and Screws. -k optional Skirnmer-Main Drain Valve Ai5ambl "P2 IA" Bottom connection and Plug. Optional Spring-Loadad By-Pass/Equalizar Valve AMS! 43L e COLt.A A i.i,&- ro i 179 — I , mmi I lass .' Ili:! �, I � ` . ---- ,� i.� ml 2" S7aAIGH t .'%P' "aE+o LACE :+P'rI '. I 3.sKst .1MODEL N0. tp' qY sp-loai-1 A33 3�juSt able cov?r collar. Tampir-Proot r0v2(, bas',+_-,. Plo-Convol Pil--e- 12,/-.1' long throat and 15:'x wide s-ki-Mmer OPEning. Face rim, 1a;kaU and szrz!ws. SP. 1085.1 R I V, Sam=- 3; r Io85 i, but with 9-1/3" diarn!12r Round Cover. (not SP. 1085.2 Sam! as S'•1085•1. but wih 9'4 12 33 m, -n) long throe: and mc.. -.:ng flange for up to I"thick W31ii. I, "'.k 1-1-111 01 Standard scr2,vs 3r! for ]ill a-' -i-fli Ehic'<n!!5. L-0-'19 .. 77 i iF SSla-Rttils proud to expand on.its,p rove ri. [� T SK -SERIES.. �� Posl-Flo°cartridge deslgrt,-andrbrjngyou,the product:lhat makes Ultra Capacity Filtration - a:reality. Np'Iongar s'impl.y'. ' F I L. T R A T ! O t8 .,cartridges," Sla-Rlle's'sdvanded technology has rough- entlrely new class.of fllf�atlon to the -'Y. y. 5la Rite's modu MODULAR. MEDIA. iermedfa concept Inedroorates the latest In media sclance, prfectlblacfow, and an Integral manifold !esi;': FILTER-.. namely, Ultra Cepeciry Filtration. This llitratlon con=apt puts tatally care-free.opjratf.on within reach of today's pool owners. CERTIFICATIONS – The filter shall be tested and certified by a natlonallyr eecognized•testing laboratory to conform to- •5 Get. .. '�'. • .'�Ni 120 28 5' 42" ! : �.:+. •. 6 -:. - '-'` S�'.•. • S7 d'.• ' . S8M 150 02 5' x2.25 g ; . ;•:;: 40 y� A = width . 'llllllllllll ,. `. '3 = height - :: •.: C = number of clamps 0 = area (width) needed to !a'<e oN ciao = area (height) needed !o remOve_lol I all dimensions shown in incl -9s. • • :y E t., uAx: Hato 7' STS -RITE UNIO4 (OWHI`1104S la .o so w 100 . soft * 7aLL'-NS'e4 41HUr! 11. slow Turnover Rate (Gallons) Tank Approt. Filler Optimal' Flow Rated" (Flow Rate x 60 x Hours) Port Ship. Weight Catalog Number Area Performance GPM At 10 Hrs. (sq. tt.) at this GPM per sq. h. At 6 Hrs. At 9 Hrs. ibs 1 _ size (lbs-1- -- ------- 576,1120 000. 50 90 SJ 100 19 30".000 24 -4 3,000 30-50-000 2" 120 Sah.t 130 430 50 - 110 50 - 124 19 - 43,000 24 • 60,000 30 7 .000 2' 147 'oovaang ai +n,s „PM will pro,ide the longest filter c7cles cornbin9d with the best and gr9atsst dirt loading caoa-�N 9a;ed on u5c -ared flow range 31 333 GPM per squara too! for the 971-0 20 and .275 GPM for the S8M150. :: • ::acu, a;n . al.•e 1equlred Nor:: Oeelaonq i un,ls - maamum eon!inuai ocarating orae>ure of 50 PSI fool/;pa (balherl aopliea!iens. morn cr.. 7e=raPng v a!'r Iemo�ra!ure +,ne,• I 0 FraO `CI' Catalog 177 + Apprat. Ship. Number Oescriptlon Weight "!bs.) Union x 2" Slio Adapter – Pkg. of 2 1 �KG. 139 Union x 2" FRT Adaoter _ Pkg. of 2 -%70.]-0100— --- Union x I.1'2•' F?T Adapter – Pkg. of 2 7_.",03-0:0 :0 + -- Union x I • I r2-' Slip Adapter – Pkg. of 2 t 5021'0200S t 30 sq. '1. Inner Reolacemenl Mcdule [or 57NI120 g 25022.0201 S 200 so. M. Outer Reolacemant Modula for S7M120 21 23021-0202S I g I sq. it. Innar Raolacemenl Module for S3M 150 13 Drain.safe DS 360 Anti—Entrapment Type, Submerged Suction Outlet Cover Read these instructions in their entirety prior to starting installation ANSI/ASME A112.19.8 (2005) Certified. Safe Flow Rate 123 (GPM) Gallons Per Minute For use with suction outlet sumps up to 8 inch in size Note: read all instructions prior to installation. It is recommended this product be used in conjunction with an ANSI/ASME A112.19.17 Certified (SVRS) Safety Vacuum Release System, properly installed by a licensed pool professional. Important Information: • Do not exceed DS 360 Safe Flow Rate: 123 gallons per minute. Post safe flow rate in an obvious location in pump room. • Acceptable connecting pipe sizes: up to 2S". • Inspect this unit for proper attachment daily, inspect for fractured or damaged parts daily. • Never operate any pool/spa facility if drain cover is damaged, cracked, fractured, loose or missing. • Use supplied 316 Grade S/S (12 per kit) security screws to install this anti -entrapment type drain cover. • Ensure existing sump screw attachment holes are clean and free of debris prior to attachment. • Carefully tighten screws to secure cover. Do not over tighten screws. Damage to the DS 360 could result, causing serious injury or death. If the DS 360 is damaged, do not start pump(s) until a new DS 360 unit is properly reinstalled. • After slowly tightening supplied screws, be certain DS 360 cannot be moved side to side, vertically or horizontally to ensure secure attachment. Do not over tighten screws. !!! Read these instructions in their entirety prior to starting installation. Keep these instructions for future reference!!! ► Attempt this operation in a dry environment. ► Do not install this product on seating or backrest of seating area. ► Do not place this product within three feet of another suction outlet on the same suction line or mounting plane. ► If one suction outlet should become blocked, the remaining suction outlets shall be capable of handling the flow of the system. ► Be certain pool/spa pump.(s).are secured. ► Use battery operated drill (if need be), or a "yankee type" manual screw diver to pre -drill holes. ► Use supplied security tool and S/S 316 grade security screws. ► Do not increase flow through system by'increasing pump size or horsepower. ► Do not allow children to sit, play or interact with main drains or suction outlets. Optional tools: awl, 1/16 inch drill bit, battery operated drill or a "yankee type" manual screw driver to predrill holes, brush and or dust pan to clean surface area prior to installation. Installation: 1. Remove existing main drain cover. Clean area and prep for DS 360 install. 2. Install this product in a right side up position. ANSI/ASME Al 12.19.8 (2005) labeling is on the top of the unit. Set DS 360 on sump and align existing screw holes with DS 360 screw ports (5.5 to 7.5 inch bolt centers) this configuration fits most common sump screw patterns. Outer edges must be flush with existing poolispa liner. Do not start pump if the edges of the DS 360 are not flush and tight to the existing liner be it; plaster, exposed aggregate, fiberglass, coated surface or vinyl. 3. Insert the two supplied screws into the existing holes in the sump, (6 sets of screws included to match original OEM screws) hand tighten. (Do not overtighten!) 4. Then, using a 1/16 inch drill bit, drill approximately (2)1/4 inch deep holes, at a 90 degree off -set (screw holes pre drilled in DS 360 cover) into the existing mud ring plastic, as close to the sumps frame as possible. 5. Use all four (4) screw ports to mount DS 360. Insert the other two matching OEM supplied screws, hand tighten only using the supplied uni-screw security tool. DO NOT O ICER TIGHTEN SCREWS, AS THIS MAY DAMAGE THE DS 360 OR THE EXISTING SUMP!! 6. Do not install DS 360 if screws are. not secured properly. Install the next screw size larger (supplied). It is important all four screw attachment openings are utilized. In some cases it may require you to predrill four new screw ports for a secure fit. 35 30 Cn UJ 25 z cL 20 UJ 15 � 10 f. 5 C DS - 360 FLOW TESTS / Cv VALUE 60 100 140 180 220 260 300 340 380 420 460 500 FLOW RATE (GPM) THREE YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY. Model DS 360 This product is warranted to the original purchaser to be free from defects in material or workmanship. During the warranty period, under normal use the DS 360 will be replaced (proof of purchase required) upon our option providing the DS 360 was properly installed as per manufacturers instructions. This warranty is void and shall not apply if the DS 360 has been altered or installed with other products outside of New Water Solutions, Inc. manufacturing. This product is warranted for a period of 3 years from date of purchase. Use supplied hardware or equipment This unit shall be replaced every three years. Original Date of Installation: by DS 360 Anti -Entrapment Type Submerged Suction Outlet Cover Manufactured by: New Water Solutions, Inc. P.O. BOX 360 Topton NC 28781 Any questions or suggestions: 561-433-2580 www.drainsafe.com R. -P. 21-00 As Smart A's It Looks EXCL US! VE'F EA.&T V R. E S: • Guaranteed to Operate in the Wind with Integrated Stackless. Top • tj -on No More Heat Sinks, Thanks to an Alumliia.Si * 11ci Fibre Comb st! Chamber and Re-deisigjp of H.et'-E'-kdhq ngde.:&� Turners & Internal Service Diagnostics1 :his"-'' 9 00 & Easy Off and On Door a Contemporary Fore . st Green and Charcoal Grey Colors 0 Field Repairable, User Friendly Cabinet • Unitherm Governor Eliminates Condensation, Sooting and Scale ADDITIONAL FEATURES: • 81 Percent -Eificien:cy • t Pressure Drop . . . . . . . . . . . " 125 GPM Water Flo w with Lowes e Headers Cast Iron or Bronz .......... • External Home Own6rs-SQrvice Indicator Lights -A • Longest Lasting Pblytu.f -Powder Coating 4. • 5 Year Smart Warranty r7 -M 'q CL 651 Cliff Road 9 SVJLL� NJ "1 55337 BURNSVILLE NIN 55337 '00 606F F113ERGLASS S7#APJD- APPLICATION T'ne 606E Fiberglass Sr;-r.d is intended for light to moderate duty use with either the Frontier III or Glas-Hide Boards in only the G,boc 11 .83m) lengt�s on residential pools. Them ar= no unusual climatic restrictions for this stand's use. TANE)ARP FEATURES h FRgided �cpylic o, irer hady in.Radiafic White which has been reinforced and strengt-eneh Stand eonsis'cs 8i a stand and a r J our-poirt, Jg. mounting sYs Ern, coat e- -®r I Featuring a pair of opposing force steel springs on either side of the -026) are powder -coated art the body's interior. F_ a very strong deck mount. The sp6ngs of il�� unic 60rdered se . pai�acely as the 69-202 stand's Body whsle experience strong board action with in Radiant White to match the accenting the chosen board color. The 606E Fiberglass Stand is intended for use Only with a ' 6 -Foot (1.33rni Frontier III or Glas- Hide Board (a jered separaL T1 -,e stands come completz v with.a v 3�aunt"' jig and hardware to sim Uni-i'vi pjify, easeand speed installation. Except spacers and washers which are provided wid� the- springs (see. above), hardware neces sary-'fot the mounting of the board to the VU t stand is provided with the board. .._-S-PEc[AL NOTE S n rn Diving boards (including spring boards., . ump boards and starting placfor s) shall be installed only on pool njeat;ng or exceeding the minimumminimumrequir2mancs for the various Pool types as- -outlin'pcl in the current edition of ANSVNSPI DECK END WATER ENO (for F-ublic Fools). ANSbNSPI-S (for Residential -Pools). in addition, all installations must meet or 3- - JUMP . HOW .. exceed applicable local codes with installation BOARD accomplished in accordance with S.R.SMITH written instructions. LENGTH: a'- (MIN.) WA (Fi1CKNESS: 6- (MIN W1 0 TH. JV (MIN.; GUARnNiEE CUSTOMER'S CONCRETE OR h+�CKNESS RECOMMEND compressive strength of concrete to be 5soo poi oe.greater -F& r%, rd% HA R T, ANSIAPPI-5 1995 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD F -UH RESIDENTIAL .. .. ..... ........ Z:M� i�m•jn 4,, P b 6 1. 7�-p q��!t Z,P= 'qVa tW . . � � _1.1;1UKNF_ - - - -DIVING_ acw-5L. '"' ;, - , IF + V Bn l. 2 2 •F ONTI'EIF01 R V 4 LAS -H O�: ANSWNSPt-5-1995 STbt4o Ai;O To BE USED REFER TO 'TH* AT FqINT A. FOR. TYPE POOL AND ED -rr4 MIN. OEP �7 IN L;UN0bNJVI pq vm in ONVf c6i, Refer Co Schemadr, shown below'% INGROUND SWIMMING POOLS POOL/SPA PUMP s.-if-prk-n:ng, rnedlu:n n33d p;.rnp !^3A (Irougn 2.112 MPF SERIES Min an extra la!ga, In:alral h3ir and !irit strainer. Pre-.(slOn- -molded of a propr'etary bland of glavi-raInto, -ad tharmoplav!c mp--. SVIS3 UL mat Is hlgnly rraslan ras`swi(, The Ideal pumps where high E IS A a y EFFICIENT flow and quIal operVlori are raqulrad, Union fl; Ings optlon3l, not Included. I j j I TTQ fW ltrox ?.4f[ two. (Imul 1111. -10 JA(MaX1,190LAO Ilinal, 1,110. laTTIMIQ io Affln N.&JI119A "otut All I.W. 5:31 EFFICISNCY SIZING r:f(l I I I fill [KC(IMIX400 lQI[I ill HP INION ;IIw,'nliror 50 - — - — - — - — - -- 40 2 HP A Hp lit 2. , JJ2 - Ill HP I HP 3i4 'rip 113 Hp It lilt - IA HP 10111 0. --------- 20 40 60 80 100 120 WWI U.S. C A LL 0 N S p M I N 1j, T z- 111.11 01. me n a ion Catalog Na. JL 11 M. PR A 6 0 L 25.1;3" App , M FRA 5 rox 4 3. 112 Catalog we!g]v NIPRASFIL 25. 1/2" Nu nn be r D e i rl P 1 (0 11 . I I," =PT "- E 77'C3-01130 2" Union Hai. x , ) NiP.RA6GL 27" P Ick ag -3 of 2 ,NI P.9 A 5 Y.: L 25.11'2" 111111 7703 —r,, joi 2" Union Hall x i •112' 5;1.0 ,MPEASDL 25.5118" I Package of 2 MPEAdEi- 23" PKK 138 2" Union Hall Y, 2" SII? M -PEA 5 F;- 25.5/9" Packaga of 2 M i3=-A5G(- 28-315- WX K G 2" Union Ha!I x 2" FRT - R.K 1 3 9 .MP --: AA 5 0 L 27.1;4" 1! AIM Pac,,age of 2 acrylic Trap Lid MPEA6YGL 25-518` (aiguanids ReSiV3,10 fy1F`=-AA5YGL 27.1/4" 1 1?3.11 T, as 1.1d Wreinc, 17330.0008 Rubber PQMP Base Pad r]:I,l 4:11 H -I !,'1771777 i Catalog Na. Catalog No. Standard Enargy-Etflclent No.-ninil M%XI.-n-Arn '--Old A-7nQ3 Approx 5'11:3- Oyna-Gias Dyna -Max H? SHP voltaga Dyna -Gras 0-1r,34y13x Ora-,U;al 0'r, 3Ai a SINGLE SPIED MPRA .5 OL d t,,i P -A 6 D L 3/4 .95 1 l5i230 5 35 NIPRASEL N11 R EA 3=- 1.23 11512 30 15.17 6 13 3 15; 9 3' ,1,!RRA5r-L tvi P!-:* A,3 Fi- 1!2 1.65 115i230 19.2.1 6 13 YI -D 42 -NIRRA301- M P EA3GI- 2 2.20 230 12.0 4 43 23) 230 - - S4 TWO SPQR - I i/2 - 1,4 1.65 230 9 2.-'2.5 45 NIP:-:A3Y01- 2 - 113 2.20 230 7 MP::- A6Y 0 2.1;2 - 1/3 2.5.3 230 1 11 3.:3 5 n • ` Specir�am.�Amerli:te (SAm}- L-�' rr.—Swrmmrng Pao.s an�I AvaPlabie January 2000 Pr6duct Na. I Oescriptian Spectrum Amerlile (SAm) Light 600015 1 SAm, 120V, 30 fl. 0 000016 V, 60 It. 0 ;E50 V, 100 11. o , Is fl.o , 60 ft. 0 SAM, 120V, 2511. e' 0 JL listed. 0 CSA aporaved. Pac , ):;Rb I N: a. R "P 0'..R. { r! 6 Pas The Spectrum Am'rlite (SAm) is the world's first submersible color light for sw mming pools, Transform backyard ambiance with the flip of a switch. The Spectrum Amerlite delivers a nearly wa er co ors, Custom mix a color to match the evening's mood or lat SAm slowly:waltz your customer's pool from color to dazzling color. With twin 3,000 hour tungsten halogen bulbs, SAm delivers white light comparable to the 30OW Amerlite you have relied on for decades, SAm- color synchronizes with other SA -ms and is power and color controlled by a single toggle or Compoo! switch in the house or by the pool equipment, SAm can also cooperate with other controllers including plug in X-10. Flt; all full size Pacrab/American/Purex niches Brilliant colors ° Exclusive: Spectrum Color Roll Hold on custom color Controlled by'a single switch ° VVhite light of 300'x! Amerlite ° 3,000 hour halogen bulb life Same 3 -wire installation Calor synchronization standard Three-year, Limited Warranty Date: January B, 2001 To: To Whom it May Concern From: Harold MEMO Re: Coverstar safety covers: UL and ASTM standard F 134591 for safety covers for swimming pools All Coverstar covers fully certified by UL and meet the ASTM standard for safety covers as specified in ASTM standard F 13413-91 when they are installed and maintained properly according to the installation and homeowner instructions which have been provided by Coverstar. On several different occaslons, the Coverstar covers, both automatic and manual have been tested by independent testing laboratories and have always been found to be in compliance with all the ASTM requirements for safety covers. Our cover is also listed by UL (Fite E 164833) and classified by UL as a power safety cover in accordance with ASTM F 1346-91 If you wish to verify either of the UL certifications, take the following steps: Go to www.ul.com Once there click on Search UL.com Click on Online Certifications Directory. Under General Search click on UL File Number Type in E164833 and hit enter You should now see Coverstar's listings. If you have problems, you can also leach by company or by Automatic Pool Covers If more information is required about ASTM and its standards, you can go to their website at www.astm.org. Shown below is the UL authorized label that is attached to the automatic cover system that we ship. If you have any further questions about our covers, the UL.certifications or the ASTM standaWs, please call or Email me. L0127 3-08-04 COVERSTAR YM 1T95 West, 200 North, Lindon, UTM2 Phone 8OW17-1283 Fax8OW73-5M Eniailhr@coversUr.com U-) z z O C) o z P a Q N V 0 O OW _._ 0-,L 0-,LLU „0-,9 w W LIJwLo V) 2 U) n- 4 II n-0 0 Qo IEo w O z 1 w . 0_, Ua 1 I 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i M _ �O N oO -LC) LL � N 'o Cr w O U Z: V) o 0 Q W zZ z Z N O o n f= 0 WUU\U W UQ L, zU OM WZO _SW 0 d' O o Q O U < W J:2 wit o, MQ �22W QO J(jZ,F UW U =zaQ� UW 5Z1.O. OO N m Q 0 m zJ WoZ U iQZWaf im a=-Inp wo Q UJ Q Q Z ''z\ate U N 0QZviz oz Q 0 ZQ O M hoar O \a w Uw Q Z U F t W S_z W° O W w U w LJ.. o _ Fn o o �I w W o oio i W W W J IL oU) o 0 W z/ Q ` m 0 ULL ° W � W �Q> w U Q O W LL ol Q z [a X O r U) N r ej N � (0 9 N •• Lo (� N U co W W Xk 2 /] O O D > > O N LL � N 'o Cr w O U Z: V) o 0 Q W zZ z Z N O o n f= 0 WUU\U W UQ L, zU OM WZO _SW 0 d' O o Q O U < W J:2 wit o, MQ �22W QO J(jZ,F UW U =zaQ� UW 5Z1.O. OO N m Q 0 m zJ WoZ U iQZWaf im a=-Inp wo Q UJ Q Q Z ''z\ate U N 0QZviz oz Q 0 ZQ O M hoar O \a w Uw Q Z U F t W S_z W° O W w U w LJ.. o _ Fn o o �I w W o oio i W W W J IL oU) o 0 W z/ Q ` m 0 ULL ° W � W �Q> w U Q O W LL ol Q z [a X O r U) N r ej N � (0 9 N •• Lo (� N U co W W Xk 2 /] O O D > > N IV O 1 0 I 0 a I 0 4 X H w ao 0 m O 0 m O 4 6'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" O U) x r m M C) r- --A m D 24'-0" Z m m I 6'-0" 8'-0"LT 6'-0 " C D 20'-0" � Cl G) I o o --I I O Ol .p I , O m m n mC4 o N o 0 o D 0 O N V (n m N> v� m N r O _ vRo > o�ml _V6*6*�rl 6+f r' TI ANO YOOi � � y0 y0 y0 y� ik 1 0 I 0 a I 0 m I 0 m o ti w ao 0 m O 0 m O 6'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 2. 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Brian and Joanne Mullen for a Critical Area Permit for a swimming pool located at the following described property: Lot 4 Block 2 Vals Addition, Dakota County, MN (PIN #27-81275-040-02) More particularly this property is located at 1122 Orchard Circle This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 3 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this Critical Area Permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-1850. 114 1122 Orchard Circle Dakota County, MN Ix 1 1144-.'- 1146 125 EJ ca F W87 76 .325 1.5 17-95 54- Ila 36 1 JE CoLh T127-1 45 ["".11 113.3, 39 1-38. . . L L -- - - ------ 231 68 52 146 132 100 g5 ORCHARL N.. 120 2 -4— -L- 141 t1j 1--1-124 1849 237 141 120 > 1140 1-554 1853 M 171'33 -4 4 Disclaimer Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, I inch = 135 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. —43— 07 F� ,x1143` 1135 .1127 112- : I.l KJN1--SLEY UP s! 96 ORCHARD CIR 120. .58 II nor j - F : .''Llj 4 L-1 134 1128/ LJ .'25 120 95 116 113 EJ ca F W87 76 .325 1.5 17-95 54- Ila 36 1 JE CoLh T127-1 45 ["".11 113.3, 39 1-38. . . L L -- - - ------ 231 68 52 146 132 100 g5 ORCHARL N.. 120 2 -4— -L- 141 t1j 1--1-124 1849 237 141 120 > 1140 1-554 1853 M 171'33 -4 4 Disclaimer Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, I inch = 135 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. —43— F� TTT-A�7 1135 .1127 112- : I.l KJN1--SLEY UP s! .40 EJ ca F W87 76 .325 1.5 17-95 54- Ila 36 1 JE CoLh T127-1 45 ["".11 113.3, 39 1-38. . . L L -- - - ------ 231 68 52 146 132 100 g5 ORCHARL N.. 120 2 -4— -L- 141 t1j 1--1-124 1849 237 141 120 > 1140 1-554 1853 M 171'33 -4 4 Disclaimer Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, I inch = 135 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Chavez Eduardo Perleberg Paul G & Elaina K Phillips Jay C & Jane Marie W 1813 Lexington Ave S 42111 Fremont Ave S 1127 Orchard PI Saint Paul Mn 55118-4115 Minneapolis Mn 55409 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Mosvick Roger K & Nona 1133 Orchard PI Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Hughes Robert J & Susan A 1117 Orchard PI Unit 1117 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Hinsch Ruth W 1125 Kingsley Cir S Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4161 Osmon Nancy S Tste 1144 Kingsley Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4162 Alden John F & Meredith B 1156 Kingsley Ct Saint Paul Mn 55118-4162 Prodahl Thomas J & Julie A 1124 Orchard PI Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4118 Daly Kevin W & Margaret R 1851 Orchard Hill Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4168 Strommen Gerald A & Marilyn F 1128 Orchard Cir Saint Paul Mn 55118-4146 Fogt Robert G 1145 Orchard PI Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Malloy William J Tste 1115 Kingsley Cir S Saint Paul Mn 55118-4161 Camp Matthew C 1127 Kingsley Cir S Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4161 Lane Miles I & Harriet K 1146 Kingsley Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4162 Dawson Northrop Jr & Erna G 1164 Kingsley Ct Saint Paul Mn 55118-4162 Abelovitz Martin H & Karole K 1850 Orchard Hill Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Roscher Michael J & Margaret 1140 Orchard Cir Saint Paul Mn 55118-4146 Mullen Joanne & Brian 1122 Orchard Cir Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4146 Nordstrom Ralph W & Pamela 1139 Orchard PI Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Fonfara Allan E & Geraldine 1117 Kingsley Cir S Saint Paul Mn 55118-4161 Evans Edward T 1137 Kingsley Cir S Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Johnson Thomas E 1154 Kingsley Ct Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4162 Olin David & Joan 1136 Orchard PI Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4118 Kelly Thomas C 1849 Orchard Hill Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Bertrand James J & Sharon W 1134 Orchard Ave Mendota Heights Mn 55118 Mikelsons Ralfs H & Mary Lou 108 Union Ct Ne Renton Wa 98059-5239 Aullen Brian E & Joanne J Dorn Paul G & Lisa M B Gordon Fred & Karen 1122 Orchard Cir 1129 Orchard Circle 1135 Orchard Cir Saint Paul Mn 55118-4146 Mendota Heights Mn 55118-4146 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4146 Deutsche Bank National Trust C Seldon David J Tste Hughes Robert J & Susan A 7700 W Parmer Ln 1301 158Th St W 1117 Orchard PI Unit 1117 Building D Burnsville Mn 55306-5480 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4119 Austin Tx 78729 IR am_�s_Rd� Douglas-Rd- LIF �6 0\ oo on\ / elook- .d �- 1122 Orchard Circle ,� r -- ---- arie- ve_ Orchard P l ate-'- ------ I -1 K If — ana t —� ---- ----- `---- ,IEj L_ J _ Ava kDr_-.— -X- �-../ Hunter C# — 1 Oir_c l e__ t Site Location Map j Water/Wetlands City Roads Major Roads parcels ®... ! MunicipalBoundaries NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED +, 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 plan ners@nacplanning_com. MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Carie A. Fuhrman/Stephen Grittman DATE: June 17, 2010 MEETING DATE: June 22, 2010 SUBJECT: McDonald's Conditional Use Permit Amendment CASE NO: Case No. 10-22; NAC Case 254.04-10.19 APPLICANT(S): Paster Enterprises & RLK Incorporated LOCATION: 2020 Dodd Road ZONING: B-4, Shopping Center District GUIDE PLAN: MU -PUD Background and Description of Request: Paster Enterprises and RLK Incorporated, on behalf of McDonalds Corporation and Jane McKay, are requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment in order to update the existing drive-through at the McDonald's Restaurant at 2020 Dodd Road. The property is 2.26 acres in size, zoned B -4 -Shopping Center, and is designated as MU -PUD on the future land use plan. Drive-in and fast food restaurants are listed as conditional uses in the B-4 District. McDonald's has an existing CUP, and therefore an amendment is required. Analysis: The project includes a realignment of the existing tandem, in-line drive-through with the construction of a new side-by-side drive-through at the existing McDonald's restaurant. The project is proposed to include the replacement of the drive-through islands, relocation of existing signage, and installation of new signage. In addition to the drive- through and signage improvements, McDonald's is also planning to paint the building as part of the plans for the site. The plan is for construction to take place in the summer of 2010. Site Circulation. The site is located on the southeast intersection of Dodd Road and TH 110. As it currently exists, there are two main driveway accesses into the McDonald's parking lot off of the Mendota Plaza parking lot. A service lane is located directly to the east of the building and one drive-through lane is located to the east of the service lane. (See aerial photograph). The proposed update includes creating one main driveway into and out of the southwest corner of the McDonald's parking lot off of the Mendota Plaza site (directly to the east of the existing Amoco building). Then, a separate driveway is being proposed to branch off of the new main driveway to access the drive-through lanes and enter the parking lot further southeast. A second drive- through lane and drive-through island are being proposed to the southeast of the existing drive-through lane. The service lane directly next to the building is proposed to remain. In addition, the trash area in the southeast corner of the property is proposed to remain. Access to the trash area will be provided from the drive-through access lane, exiting north adjacent to the second drive-through lane, around the building, and exiting out the main driveway in the southwest corner. Parking. Nineteen (19) parking stalls are being eliminated in order to accommodate the new drive-through layout and the updated access constructed with the Mendota Plaza improvements. 54 parking stalls (51 standard stalls and 3 handicap -accessible stalls) still remain on the property. Staff would suggest that the vacant area in the northwest corner of the parking lot be striped in order to provide additional parking stalls as replacement for the eliminated spaces. Lighting. According to the applicants, the site will continue to utilize the existing pole - mounted fixtures, but there will be minor relocations on the south side of the site to accommodate the updated entry and stacking lanes. Signage. The proposed sign locations are shown on the site plans. Separate sign permits have been applied for and are being reviewed separately. City Engineer. The City Engineer has reviewed the requested Conditional Use Permit and has no comments. Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided as MU -PUD, Mixed Use PUD. Improvements and upgrades to an existing commercial site are in compliance with this designation. Conditional Use Permit Review Standards. Section 12 -1L -6.E1 outlines the conditional use permit review standards. The following shall be taken into consideration when reviewing a conditional use permit: • the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and welfare of occupants or surrounding lands; • existing and anticipated traffic conditions including parking facilities on adjacent streets; and • the effect of the proposed use on the comprehensive plan. 2 The following standards shall also be met: • the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community; • the proposed use will not cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards; • the proposed use will not seriously depreciate surrounding property value; and • the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the comprehensive plan. Action Requested: After a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider one of the following recommendations: 1. Approval of the conditional use permit request to update the existing drive- through lane at the McDonald's fast food restaurant, based on the attached findings of fact, and subject to the following condition: the vacant area in the northwest corner of the parking lot shall be striped in order to provide additional parking stalls and make up for the eliminated parking stalls. 2. Denial of the conditional use permit amendment to update the existing drive- through lane at the McDonald's fast food restaurant, based on one of the following findings: the proposed use will have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding lands and community; or the proposed use will negatively influence traffic conditions and parking facilities on adjacent streets; or the proposed use is not consistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance; or the proposed use will seriously depreciate the surrounding property values. Staff Recommendation: When considering a request for a conditional use permit amendment, there are numerous factors that must be taken into account, including the possible effects on traffic, parking, and property values; its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance standards; and its possible impacts on the surrounding lands and community. Planning staff believes that the proposed drive-through update is compliant with the review standards; and therefore is recommending approval of the proposed conditional use permit amendment. Supplementary Materials: 1. Application materials dated 05-28-10 2. Site location map 3. Aerial Photograph 3 Draft Findings of Fact for Approval Conditional Use Permit Amendment 2020 Dodd Road The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Conditional Use Permit: 1. The updated drive-through should not affect the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands; 2. The revised drive-through alignment will improve traffic flow in the adjacent shopping center parking lot by consolidating access; 3. The proposed drive through layout is a compatible use within the designated land use district of the Comprehensive Plan; 4. The updated drive-through would not appear to have any impact on surrounding property value; and 5. The proposal meets all other Zoning Ordinance requirements M - -- ( HIGHWAY 110 —� Site Location Map Water/Wetlands /\/ City Roads /\ l Major Roads U parcels L®...®! MunicipalBoundaries McDonald's Site — Aerial View 2020 Dodd Road NIP Source: Dakota County GIS L city of Mendota He5ghts APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: Paster Enterprises (Last) (First) Attn: Ken Henk Case No. / 0 Date of Application Fee Paid _P3`501 PH- 651 / 646 - 7901 (M) E -Mail Address: khenk@pasterent.com Address-. 2227 Universit_AvP w _fit._—pall MN 551_14 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Owner Name-. McDonalds Corporation Attn: Ray Croastan ---- (Last) (First) (M) Address_ 1650 West 82nd Street Bloomington MN 55431 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: SE Quadrant of Dodd Road & TH 1 1 0 Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed crust be provided) Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota_Plaza__ 27-48400-01.0-01 Type of Request- ---Rezoning equest: _Rezoning X Conditional Use Permit Conditional User Permit for P.U.D. Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number 295 Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Critical Area Permit Other (attach explanation) Section Present Zoning of Property B4 _Present Use Restaurant Proposed Zoning of Property B4 __Proposed Use Restaurant _. hereby declare that all statements made in this req U st and on the additional material are true. (Sig_nature of AVlicant) Date Received' ` (Si are of Owner) E103 3/®ejoE-ja Curw:' o Mendota Heights, Mrd 55(98 (651) 45B-fl850fa PAX (651)452-8940 Proiect Narrative McDonalds at Mendota Plaza 2.26± Acre Site SE Quadrant of TH 110 and Dodd Road - Mendota Heights, Minnesota May 28, 2010 For Conditional Use Permit Application Introduction On behalf of McDonalds Corporation and Jane McKay, Paster Enterprises and RLK Incorporated are pleased to submit the enclosed plans and documents for Conditional Use Permit for the updated drive-thru at the 2.26± acre McDonald's at 2020 Dodd Road. The project proposes a new side-by-side drive-thru to replace the existing tandem, in-line drive through_ Project Request ■ Approval of Conditional Use Permit Background The McDonald's has been at this location since around 1950. The site has required several Conditional Use Permits for the drive-thru use and upgrades, with the most recent Conditional Use Permit obtained in November 2004 to add a cash booth to the existing building. Access to the site is from a shared access from Dodd Road, through the Mendota Plaza site. Currently the site is zoned B-4 and guided MU -PUD. This application does not propose to change the comprehensive plan or zoning. Project Description The project is a realigmnent of the existing drive-thm to convert from a tandem, in-line system to a side- by-side system_ The project will include replacement of the drive-thru islands, relocation of existing signage and installation of new signage_ The proposed signage package is being submitted for permit concurrent with this Conditional Use Pennit application. In addition to the drive-thru improvements, McDonald's has plans to paint the building as part of their revitalization plans for the site. Timing The drive-thru realigmnent will be started and completed in the summer of 2010, with construction to start upon approval of this Conditional Use Permit application and corresponding signage permit. Parking Parking will continue to be provided similar to the existing conditions, with 19 stalls being eliminated to accommodate the new drive-thru layout and the updated access constructed with the Mendota Plaza improvements. The majority of McDonald's business is served through the drive-tiuu. The current parking layout has excess capacity, so the loss of stalls is not anticipated to have a negative impact. Project Narrative McDonald's at Mendota Plaza May 28, 2010 RLK Project No. 2005-484-M Page 1 of 2 However, should there be a need for additional parking in the future, there is capacity in the northwest corner of the site where striping can be added to provide additional parking stalls. Site Lighting The site will continue to utilize the existing pole mounted fixtures, with minor relocations on the south side of the site to acconunodate the updated entry and stacking lanes. Signage The proposed signage locations are shown on the site plans included with this submittal. The signage has been submitted for a separate permit concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit application. Hours of Operation McDonald's currently has no plans to modify the existing hours of operation. Submittal Package • Project Narrative • Conditional Use Permit Application Checklist • Pen -nit Application and Fees • 1 full-size plan set (folded) 1 11"xlT' plan set Applicant and Development Team Owner McDonalds Corporation Telephone 952-884-4355 1650 W. 82"d Street Fax 952-885-4769 Bloomington, MN 55431 Ray Croaston Email ray.croaston@us.mcd.com Applicant Mendota Mall Associates Telephone 651-646-7901 2227 University Avenue Fax 651-646-7900 St. Paul, MN 55114 Ken Henk Email Kihenk@paster-enterpi-ises.com Civil Engineer RLK Incorporated Telephone 952-933-0972 6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Fax 952-933-1153 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Aaron Hemquist, Professional Engineer Email ahemquist@rlkine.coin Project Narrative McDonald's at Mendota Plaza May 28, 2010 RLK Project No. 2005-484-M Page 2 of 2 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING June 2. 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Paster Enterprises to request a Conditional Use Permit to replace the existing tandem, in-line drive through with a new side-by-side drive-thru at the following described property: Lot 1 Block 1 Mendota Plaza (PID #27-4840-010-01) More particularly this property is located at 2020 Dodd Road This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 1 of the Mendota Heights City Code.. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this Conditional Use Permit will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administrator at 452-1850. i.., 1!`332 2020 Dodd Road -Dakota Countv, MN 790 707 I CD Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, I inch = 196 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. 32 A c TIS 2020: 20.3 0- 01. 7 49 159, 54 J 47 333 I CD Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not Map Scale guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, I inch = 196 feet appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Tc Country Club Inc Wieland Jeff & Dawn Mendakota Countryclub Inc 2075 Mendakota Dr 2030 Dodd Rd 12075 Mendakota Dr Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1335 Mendota Heights Mn 55120 Saint Paul Mn 55120-1300 Mendota Mall Associates Lip City Of Mendota Heights Mcdonalds Real Estate Co % Edward J Paster 1101 Victoria Cury 2020 Dodd Rd 2227 University Ave Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Mendota Heights Mn 55120-1501 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip Mendota Mall Associates Lip % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster % Edward J Paster 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave 2227 University Ave Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Saint Paul Mn 55114 Mendota Mall Associates Lip Minea Marjorie R Tste City Of Mendota Heights % Edward J Paster 772 Ridge PI 1101 Victoria Cury 2227 University Ave Saint Paul Mn 55118-4339 Saint Paul Mn 55118-4167 Saint Paul Mn 55114 M AQI RLK OgMMNN - - Ag LEGEND PROPOSED EXISBNG 0 Pb— 952 933 0972 -- \ , F X529 1 53 / ` PROPERTY LINE---�--� - v EASEMENT LINE --------- ----- -- -- 6110 Hlue r..a_ Drivc • SMitc 100 • MMmclnoly, ll1N 55343 _ . I . — CURB UNE — --__— v CURB TO 6E REMOVED -' CONCRETE PAVEMENT L__,. p O � LIGHT POLE — — /_ SIGN NOTES: \ Si ARCHED MIDONALD'S DIRECTIONAL SIGN ON 4'-O HIGH POLE, SEE 7/McD 1.3 FOR BASE DETAILS. \ \ WEST FACE BLANK AND EAST FACE WITH -THANK YOU AND ARROW POINTING LEFT TOWARDS EXIT SUPPLIED BY EVERBRITE CORPORATION. W ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS 130 AMPS 12GV 60HZ. POWER REQUIREMENTS 1-AMPEROR ANP90-30, ARCHED MIDONALD'S DIRECTIONAL SIGN GN 4'-0' HIGH POLE. SEE 7/McD 1.3 FOR BASE DETAILS. BOTH FACES TO BE "DRIVE THRU' WITH ARROW ' \ POINTING TOWARDS DRIVE THIRD ENTRANCE. _ SUPPLIED BY EVERBRITE CORPORATION. ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS 130 AMPS 120V 60H Z. - / / \Ll POWER REQUIREMENTS 1-AMPEROR ANP90-30. ARCHED .,,DONALD'S DIRECTIONAL SIGN ON 4'-0' OT _ O 56 �\ , \ HIGH POLE. SEE 7/MID 1.3 FOR BASE DETAILS. 0 0 \\ OJ i EAST FACE TO BE 'DRIVE THIRD' V/I TH ARROW � POINTING TOWARDS DRIVE THIRD ENTRANCE, >E `u \ WEST FACE TO BE 'THANK YOU G,i SUPPLIED BY EVERBRITE CORPORATION. \ T' •_ / / �``.� \ ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS 130 AMPS 120V 60HZ. POWER REQUIREMENTS 1-AMPEROR ANP90-30, f E `� �\ A g ® \ \ S4 McDONALD'S SINGLE ARM GATEWAY SIGN '.// SEE EVERBRITE SIGN DRAWING IN449186S REV B WPG r /'� ` \ FOR DETAILS. PAINTED DRIVE THRU GRAPHIC. SEE 5/McD 1.1 ¢ 3 a A ©\\� 56 PAINTED THANK YOU GRAPHIC, SEE 7/MID 1.1 I bP •/� / S7 PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING GRAPHIC, SEE B/MID 1.1 X SIGN EASEMENT AREA a cy O D COD CONSTRUCTION NOTES DI LL m / II (R O \\� C RETAOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. D i'IV REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MENU BOARDS. REMOVE BASE AND WIRING. �.. PEMOVE AND RELOCA c EXISTING coo, Z / �I 'o CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER DETAIL SEE DETAIL PWT -14 ON SHEET MCD I.I. OO RELOCATED LOT LIGHTS PER MENDOTA PLAZA EXPANSION, - p NEW BIIUMIN(VS PAVING. PATCH AND MATCH INTO ADJACENT BITUMINOUS PAVING. SS �� \ I. i / O DISCONNECT AND ABANDON EXISTING DETECTOR LOOP. U612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL PWT -03 ON SHEET MID I.I. poa� E EXISTING CON1tElE LURE AND GUTTER i0 REMAIN. O , O RESE LOCATED MENU BOARD. E SHEET MCO 1.3 DETAILS. 1,4,5 AND 6 api,no� B FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DETAILS. \ _.. Y\ a o 3 B \ ��•" \� O HIGH IMPACT CANOPY AND COLOCALE 117'-10'f OM CL OF COD TO D. FR CL OF CASH MDO. MEASURED ALONG CL OF TRAVEL PATH - RE BE ATH.REUSE EXISTING COD PARIS FROM 1 OF 4z ME RELOCATED COD'S. CONVERSION KIT IS REOUIREO AND TO HE PURCHASED FROM ttQ O'2 EVERBRITE SIN COMPANY BY PASTER ENTERPRISES. CONTACT MCDONALD'S TO CONFIRM REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INS ALONG COD PARTS AND MENU BOARD. p SEE MID 1.2, DETAILS 1. 2 AND 3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DETAILS. HIGH IMPACT CANOPY AND COD. LOCATE 14'-0'± FROM CL OF COD TO I UA z j SIGNAGE INSET (1 "-20'} �� \ \� NO OF CONCRETE ISLAND. MEASURED ALONG CLO TRAVEL PA H AT AN O Ip. � <� BE 23' FROM THE BASELINE AS SHOWN. REUSE EXISTING COD PARTS FROM 1 OF O < \ ME RELOCATLD COD'S. CONVERSION KIT IS REQUIRED AND TO BE PURCHASED FROM EVER BRIIE SIGN COMPANY BY PASTER ENTERPRISES CONTACT MCDONAUYS TO CONFIRM NORTH RED UM PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLING COD PARTS AND MENU BOARD. SEE MID 1.2, DETAILS 1, 2 AND 3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND RETAILS. 6 INSTALL NEW DETECTOR LOOP. SEE Mcp1,3. DETAILS 1. 2 ARE 3, W 0 INSTALL NEW DETECTOR LOOP 2'-0• FORWARD OF CL OF COD. FLIP LOOP FORWARD. N z �I 0 20 40 SEE MID 1.3 DETAILS 1,2, AND 3 FOR ADaDONAL INFORMATION ANP DETAILS / / \ O DOUBLE ARM GATEWAY SIGN. SEE WEVERBRITE DRAWING T14492DOS REV D DOUBLE WPG SCALE IN FEET FOR DETALLS. .0 SITE DATA ONFlRM AND VERIFY PAVING SPEC W/McpONAtD'6. AWNS SHEETOL )MIID \\ O PPVIJT . PARCEL AREA: 2.26 AC. SEE DETAIL 18 ON 11 SITE NOTES BUILDING AREA: 3,960 SF SHEET INDEX Q 1-6 INCH WIDE PAINTED STRIPE. PMS 12.1 YELLOW. DINING AREA: 675± SF .0 McDONALD'S SITE PLAN M= CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES GO MCD1,1 SITE DETAILS PARKING REQUIRED: 54 (675/15+9 EMP) Mc1)1.2 COD DETAILS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) F McD1.3 SITE DETAILS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD STALLS 51 SIGN DETAIL (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) ACCESSIBLE STALLS 3 SIGN DETAIL (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) TOTAL 54 SIGN DETAIL (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) [O Q C / / \ O DOUBLE ARM GATEWAY SIGN. SEE WEVERBRITE DRAWING T14492DOS REV D DOUBLE WPG SCALE IN FEET FOR DETALLS. .0 ^O ONFlRM AND VERIFY PAVING SPEC W/McpONAtD'6. AWNS SHEETOL )MIID \\ O PPVIJT SEE DETAIL 18 ON 11 SITE NOTES Q 1-6 INCH WIDE PAINTED STRIPE. PMS 12.1 YELLOW. D. 4<„ CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES GO ©`� AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE SO SOD DISTURBED AREAS R F "OD CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR r WIDE -o' PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW. PMS 123 YELLOW. VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. O B4 y vM o rn RACK MULCH I1N ISLANDS [O Q C p O ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O 4 INCH WDE PAINTED WIDE S RIPES STRIPES - 4 lo to p q < Q zm ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O 1'-0' WIDE POINTED MERLE POINT. B4 o z ED f€z�i o < p CJ Ol �+ X O MATCH EXISTIRC PAVEMENT GRACES. EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON AN ALTA SURVEY PREPARED BY RLK, INC, z DATED MAY 4, 2010 AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO MENDOTA PLAZA PER PLANS O EXISTING TRASH AREA TO REMAIN. PREPARED BY RLK, INC. AA REMOVE EXISTING LOT STRIPING AND RESTRIPE AS SHOWN. MCD 1 . O UN MN MN �K M.. 0.kdal5 MN 0 Ph— 952 933 DM \ / PAc 952 9331153 6110 Blue Gavle Die - Sade 100 - MmucmRb, MN 5530.3 PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES 3" PAD. SLOPE GUT(CR (}/°' PER Fl. TYP.) RP GUTICR CUT AS REDO PER PLAN 1 3" RAO- a ] ec a r Pe f/4 " . / SE d e e F` MIN. OF MINIMUM 6" BEHIND GG RASE BACK DF CURB ONOER CURB TYPE .L• A B 8612 '2 ZD" L 8618 8 2fi 86x9 x1 ]2" /1 PAVEMENT K PVMT-03 B6 SME CONCRETE NRB AND CUTTER A RARP SURFACE AS PER MATCH SIDEWALK WRFR� ADA STANDARDS W/ TRUNCATED DOMES FRONT FACE OF CURB NRB RADIUS ° NRB 4' fi LURB� A PLAN VIEW OF RAMP APPROX. ROOND ALL SLDPE 10:1 SLOPE INTERSECTIONS ((! CUrRB) (("CrRB )6•B) AnNfirCUR ELEVATION NOOF. RAMP O.DB" PER FT. A" CONCRETE WALK OR RATTER CONCRETE CURB —�_ BASE AND GUTTER NOW, RAMP SHALL BE SECTION A -A TONTHE LATEST ADARowc REOURCUENTS l\ PAVEMENTRLK •°� ul o Nl AMP PVMT-14 PCOESTRIAN R 6' RE�FERENCC TO UnDOT SPEC. 2511 CONTRACTION HINTS AT 5' SPACING EXPANSION JDINTS EVERY 6D' OR LESS PAVEMENT Cn�A"�+ -� CONCRETC PAVEMENT SECTION. r`m, 18 6'-0 RIVE-,' THRIF--, NOW: ALL TEXT AND ARROW SHALL BE PAINTED YELLOW (PMS 123) s AINTED 'DRIVE TNRU' cDl. WITH ARROW NO 5GALE PRI THRU----J" NOTE: ALL TEXT SHALL BE PAINTED YELLOW (PMS 123) s PAINTED 'DRIVE TNRU' cDl. NO 5GALE G,-8- THAM( YOU NOTE: ALL TEXT SHALL BE PAINTED YELLOW (PUS 123) v PAINTED 'THANK YOU' cDl. NO SCALE S' 3' 3' YI N IB 19 PAINT SOU YELLOW (PMS 123) XI ONL Y NOTE : ARROWS AND WORDS CAN BE ARRANGED IN OTHER COMBINATIONS THAN THOSE ILLUSTRATED HERE TO ACHIEVE DESIRED RESULT. e TYPICAL PAVEMENT eDl. MARKING NO SCALE At. p3JWuvl"i TNa T. O QU Q - �3Qa oFwZu� I1.7®fls'01.'i'` l E- 0 E U a W LA a A p lz F Q w 3 A W Fx W O m w 0 < z N0. MCD1.1 LIGHT BOX FOR DOWN HGHTNG 4-F72T12 HOCW LAMPS BOLTS (4) 81' 5/B' MWN71N8-� BOLTS THUSS }25 \ O p O O 90. ) -- INSIDE ARM COD CLADDIN OUTLINE OF COD. BASE PLATE SUPPLIED I BY COD SUPPLIER. AFTER PULE IS LEVELER I I BOLTED INTO PLACE. FILL UNDER PLATE NT ALI-EMBU XFIR NON SHRINK METALLIC GROUNT. ("CURB I I / SEE 91E PLAN 2- 1-1/2' Dt CONDUITS PAVING p 1" DIA X 30' LONG w L AN-. BLOTS (4) n t t_J AUGER FMENG.. W/6 {4 VERT. REBARS AND- OU.RESORB 12 AT . SEE SOILS REPORT FIX RECOMMENDED DEPTH. JO' 3 SIDE ELEVATION cDl. NO SCALE 727 AWAY VICE ARM. RUN WARES AND CONDUIT II II FROM CANOPY II TO LEFT POLE. COD CLADpIN i Ijr II 2- Xs- X 1/4' I II II I SU- TUBE TN1N POLES. CLADDING BEHIND C II II I I WALL BE REMOVABLE II II TO ACCESS A: SERVICE RINE THE C00 & SPKRS. I I I OF COO I I I I REUSE PARTS FROM 1 RELOCATED COD UNIT. CONVERSION KIT I I II II I REWIRED. I w( i FRONT ELEVATION `)RCD1.2 NO SCALE 5' DIA HOLE IN BASE PLATE FON CONDUITS. PROVDE 120 V. PRIMARY AND SEPARATE CONDUIT FOR LOW VOLTAGE COMMUNICAII RUN SEPARATE PO CIRCUITS FOR It / AUGER FTC. CCD ANN CANOPY BASE PLATT FACE OF 1 TWIN POLE WITH INTEGRAL COD, SWINC�; ARM AND GNOPY DETAILS INSTALLER INSTRUCTIONS: 1. STAKE FOUNDATION AREA AND CONFIRM GRADE REQUIREMENTS N1TH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 2. EXCAVATE FOUNDATON AREA - 3 . INSTALL CONDUIT STISS, ANCHOR BOLTS AND POUR CONCRETE. (PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BASE BY C.C.) NOTE. COMBINED CONDUIT SHOULD NOT EXCEED 5 INCHES IN DIAMETER. 4. ALLOW CONCRETE CURE TIME AS REQUIRED. LL POOLE 5. INSTALL AND ENSURE PIS LEVELED. S. MOUNT CANOPY ON POI -E.7. INSTALL "ORDER HERE- ARM TO POLE AND LEVEL e. MAKE FINAL ELECTRICAL HOOK UP TO PRIMARY IN WATHERPROOF MN NON BOX SUPPLIED BY INSTAIlElt (ALL ELECTRICAL TO MEET LOCAL CODES.) 9. IF THERE IS A CW, MAKE ELECTRICAL AND POS CONNECTIONS. 10. ATTACH CLADDING TO POLES PER INSTRUCTONS WITH UADDING. ll. PULE IS SUPPLIED N1TH PONDER -COAT PAINT FINISH. INSTALLER TO PERFORM TOUCH UP PNNTNG AS REWIRED, PAINT IS SNIPPED WITH THE POLE FOR THIS PURPOSE. 12. TEST LIGHT CANOPY AND TOUCH UP FRAME AS REWIRED. 13.REMOVE UFRNG BOLTS AND REINSTALL HEX BOLTS. 14. CLEAN UP AREA AND REMOVE PACKAGING. OUTLINE OF COD, T PLAIN NO SCALE DESIGN NOTES: 1. CANOPY HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO MEET ROCA CODE 100 MPH NINDLOAD EXPOSURE C AND SNOW LOAD OF SO LBS/S.F.- 2- ALL CONCRETE EXCEPT CONCRETE USED FOR BACK FILL SHALL BE A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI. 1 CONCRETE BASE DESIGNED USING GOOD TO AVERAGE SCILS WITH AN ALLOWABLE COMPRESSION OF 200 PSF. 4. ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE FREE OF WATER AND FOREIGN MATERIAL BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. 5. IF (HESE CONI TIONS DO NOT EXIST. A NEW BASE MUST BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. ELECTRICAL DATA: UNELOAD : 3.64 AMPS (1) 15 AMP 120 VOLT CIRCUIT ENCLOSED BALLAST FULLHAM WORKHORSE 7 LAMPS: F72T12 CW/HO (4 REWIRED) MCD1.2 27' IF 3 AMP LOAD 3 AMP LOAD 11.8 S0. FT. 11.8 SO. FT. PRE SELL BOARDS 0 4.8 AMP LOAD o IIOV 4}.8 S0. FT. ( 4) FP -43 MENU BOARD ELEVATIONS cDl. No SCALE NUT & LOCK NUT FACE OF MENU BD IN POOR SOL CONDITIONS (SOL TYPES 1 & 2, WET SOFT CLAY, LOOSE SILT), INCREASE MENU BOARD FOUNDATION DIAMETER TO 24" AND DEPTH TO 5'-6'. L_L'3IIH:191 c&uNc CP 215.02E4 INSIDE } OUTSIDE 4 9 8 5 6 coo FP -43 MUNU BOARD MERCHANDISER 7 TRAFFIC FLOW OPTIONAL SECONDARY DOUBLE DRIVE THRU 3' so. X 1/8' 24' X 5/8' DIAMEI S HO BOLT PWOK 3/4' DIAMETER 12-i/4' (SUPPUED BY THE GOND FOR SPEAKER AND DATA. THIS SIDE W/4 5/8•-11 x 1-1/2 - OF CENTER. BOLTS. NUTS AND WASHERS. FACE OF MENU BD. OR \ C6.;POST FOUNDATION DIAMETER 5/DTI D - SFi , LOOPDET(SEEAIL DETAIL BELOW) GOND FOR POWER . $ELF LEVELLING GROUT THIS SIDE OF CENTER BUII.)INC FOR DETECTOR ' BAFFLE IN POST LOOP:A, COD AND: TO SEP AM B POWER AND DATA CABLES 1gA4' IN POOR SOL CONDITIONS (SOL TYPES 1 & 2, WET SOFT CLAY, LOOSE SILT), INCREASE MENU BOARD FOUNDATION DIAMETER TO 24" AND DEPTH TO 5'-6'. L_L'3IIH:191 c&uNc CP 215.02E4 INSIDE } OUTSIDE 4 9 8 5 6 coo FP -43 MUNU BOARD MERCHANDISER 7 TRAFFIC FLOW OPTIONAL SECONDARY DOUBLE DRIVE THRU 3' so. X 1/8' CEJ (COD A STL TUBING FRAME SUPPORT. 6.25 x 6.5 X 28.5 SIL PLATE W/4 5/8•-11 x 1-1/2 - BOLTS. NUTS AND WASHERS. OR 6' S0. X 1/4' C6.;POST FOUNDATION TOq SIL TUBING FRAME SUPPORT. 5/DTI D - SFi , LOOPDET(SEEAIL DETAIL BELOW) Q OF FOUNDATION . $ELF LEVELLING GROUT 1-1) ILTCR . BUII.)INC FOR DETECTOR ' GRACE LOOP:A, COD AND: AUDIO`PAD 3/4'.�. DIAMETER CON SPEAKER E , AND DATA MK SLOE OF CENO':FOR IEIL _ _ - DIAMETER =' E COND FOR POWER THIS SIDE OF CENTER 1-t/2 CONDUIT TO DETECTOR LOOP 8 COD POST FTG. SEE DET. S/OT1.D. FOVNDATOt"DEPM CONC CUR 8E BELOIi MOST UNE P1.68 s ENU BOARD PLAN( MENU BOARD SECTION c! 1.3 NO SCALE cD1.3 No SCALE FP43 MENU BOARD FOUNDATION DETAILS 1ELECRRRI& OY/GOND. 2'50' Y ANCHOR BOLTS O• BY G.C. ES. 4& •" ANCHOR BOLLS (.".%R'18 XTW/3• HK a FURNISHED & INSTALLED c� 0Y G.C. ANCHOR BOLT & FOUND. PLAN (8Y OMENS)I 2._O• I By G c.. ED (24 X 1p) BASE NOSTE,DETAIL TU BE USE➢ SECTION NTH SITE SIGNS RRON: TERCON EVERTE YESCO DIRECTION SIC-sN FTC. DETAIL .D1.3 NO SCALE BEAKER=POST)„ 1 VEHICLE DETEC"-LOOP. I INSTALL PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS SEE NOTES I - I ( .I SEE SHEET C2l FOR DIMENSIONS OF DRIVE-THRU LANE CONCRETE PAD FOR DETECTOR LOOP. NOTE- NO STEEL IS TO BE USED IN CONCRETE SEE D/T PAD DETAIL TRIS SHEET /-COD POST TYP. SEE DETAIL 5/SDI 1/2 PRE -MOLDED EXPANSION /-JOINT MATERIAL CONC. CURB Oft CURB AND GUTTER 1/2' SLEEVE FOR VEHICLE ° DETECTOR LOOP COD POST FOUNDATION SEE DETAIL 5/MCD1.1 LOOP (SEE DETAIL BELOW) NOTE: REFER TO SHE PLAN AND 4 -SDI FOR SECONDARY HE LOOP DETECTOR PLACEMENT SECTION INFORMATION. 1 DETECTOR LOOP `MOD1.3 DETAIL AT G.O.D. NO SCALE CON.. PLAN cEUNG KEY NOTES 1. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ITEM 215.02E5• IN PRESENTATION BOOTH. PROVIDE 2' HOLE & /5.02E5• GROMMET IN JUNCTION BOX COVER PLATE FOR POS DATA CABLES PROVIDE 2 1/2-C ABOVE I CEILING. OQO 2. OPTIONAL DRIVE-THRU WINDOW DETECTOR LOOP FOR ORDER & PRESENTATION WINDOWS - SEE SHEET M01 -1 - GC 01.1.GC TO INSTALL PVC SLEEVES TO FACILITATE POSSIBLE FUTURE LOOP INSTALLATION. 3, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ITEM 1215.02E4 IN ORDER/CASH BOOTH. PROVIDE 2- HOLE & GROMMET IN JUNCTION BOX COVER PLATE FOR 217.11E1• POS DATA CABLES. PROVIDE 2 1/1-C ABOVE CEILING. 4. PROVIDE STEEL CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR PER POS & COD ISOLATED GROUND/DEDICATED CIRCUIT DETAIL 1/2-C-2/12 & 1112 GROUND & 1 112 ISOLATED GROUND. PROVIDE 1 CB PER COD. 5. 1 1/2• PVC CONDUIT FOR REMOTE LOOP DETECTOR &COD AUDIO CABLES. EC TO PROVIDE 3 PULL STRINGS INSIDE CONDUIT. 6. 1 1/2•C FOR COD DATA CABLES. EC TO PROVIDE 3 PULL STRINGS INSIDE CONDUIT. 7. 2 1/2-C FOR COD LOOP DETECTOR, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ITEM 217.11E1' - SEE SHEET C2.3. 8. 1/2'C-2112, POWER FOR MENU BOARD ILLUMINATION. 9. 'ORDER HERE' CANOPY LIGHTS ' SEE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FOR NOTES ON NUMBERED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. No SCALE NOTE: THIS DIMENSION TO BE USED FOR THE REMOTE OETEEl LOOP (SEE DETAIL BELOW) 1 1/2' PVC SLEEVE IB' -24 FOR DETECTOR LOOP MAX SEE SHEET C21 FOR DIMENSIONS OF DRIVE-TRRU LANE CONCRETE PAD FOR DETECTOR LOOP. NOTE;_ NO STEEL IS TO BE USED IN CONCRETE SEE O/T PAD DETAIL THIS SN 1 1/2" SLEEVE FCR -1117 DETECTOR/COOP VEHI ELECTOR LOOP / INSTALL PFR_ MM. RECOMMEND TIONS SIE NOTES 11 ( / i I I / 'j ,/ BE USED FOR THE REMOTE DETEEGTOR LOOP (3_E DETAIL BELOW) 1/2' PRE -MOLDED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL COLIC. CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER r 1 1/2- REEVE FOR VEHICLE DETECTOR LOOP NOTE FOR REMOTE DETECTOR LOOP ADD CONCRETE PAD, ,-BOX AND 247 MAX. D, ST. FROM E CONDUIT TO EDGE OF CURB FDUNOATICH WALL SECTION 2 DETECTOR LOOP DETAIL McD1.3 AT DRIVE TNRU WINDOW NO SCALE 1. THE LOCATION AND ORIENTATION OF MENU BOARDS AND PRE -SELLS WERE DETERMINED BY THE SIGHT LINES OF THE CARS SHOWN. THE CARS WERE POSITIONED ACCORDING TO ME MAX AMOUNT OF CARS DURING A PEAK PERIOD. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON PROTOTYPICAL LAYOUTS SHOWN. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS TO BE BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC CONFIGURATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF NOTES 2,3 & 4. 2 MENU BOARD IS ORIENTATED FOR MEWING BY CAR 6 (PRIMARY USER) AND CAR 7 (SECONDARY USER). 3. PRE -SELL BOARD j1 IS ORIENTATED FOR VIEWING BY CAR 7 (PRIMARY USER ) AND CAR 8 (SECONDARY USER), OR AS DETERMINED BY SITE CONDITIONS. SEE PUN. 4.PRE-SELL BOARD 12 IS ORIENTATED FOR HEWING BY CAR 8 OR AS DETERMINED BY SITE CONDITIONS. 5. ME BOARDS ARE SETBACK X-6' FROM THE FACE OF OUTER CURB. EXCEPT IN AREAS SHOWN. MIS IS TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO BOARDS FROM MOVING VflI1CLE5. 6. PROVIDE TWO CIRCUITS FOR MENU BOARD AND PRE -SELL BOARDS ONE CIRCUIT FOR LIGHTS AND ONE CIRCUIT WITH LUCK FOR MOTOR AND CONTROLLER. REFER TO SHEET El FOR TERMINATION OF CONDUIT RUNS INSIDE BUILDING. 7. ALL GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. GENERAL NOTES: E o W� U McD1.3 Fal C 0 8 ATTACH LETTERS WITH: (3) 1/4-20 x 1" HXHD SCREWS (3) 1 /4" LOCK WASHERS 6.00 SQ TUBE 0.187" WALL CUTAWAY VIEW 14.00 10.0C 7 151 5 4 3 2 1 Rev: DESCRIPTION: DATE: APPROVED ATTACH SWING ARM WITH: (5) 1/2-13 x 1-1 /2" HXHD BOLTS (5) 1/2" LOCK WASHERS (5) 1/2" FLAT WASHERS NOTE 1: CLADDING CUT-OUT TO TOP\ nF SWINC�ARM CI FARANCF DETAIL B SCALE 1 : 8 CUTAWAY VIEW (4) 3/4-10 GALVANIZED //- (4) LONG ANCHOR BOLTS (8) 3/4-10 HX NUTS (4) 3/4" LOCK WASHERS (8) 3/4" FLAT WASHERS 1 I T ; DETAIL A /SCALE 1 :8 1 I 1 1 HINGE SERVICE COVER ATTACH WITH: (9) YELLOW INITIAL RELEASE 12/7/07 CHANGED FOUNDATION FROM 24x48 TO 30x601 20MAR08 CHANGED ANCHOR BOLTS FROM 48 TO 40 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: 1. STAKE FOUNDATION AREA AND CONFIRM FINAL GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITH G. C. (TOP OF FOUNDATION IS 6" ABOVE PAVEMENT (GRADE) 2. EXCAVATE FOUNDATION AREA. 3. POUR FOUNDATION (24" DIA. x 48" DEPTH) INSERT (4) 03/4" x 40" ANCHOR BOLTS (PER FIGURE 1). 4. ALLOW CONCRETE CURE TIME AS REQUIRED. 5. PLACE (4) 03/4" LEVELING NUTS AND WASHERS ON THE FOUR ANCHOR BOLTS TO PROVIDE A 2.00" GAP BETWEEN THE FOUNDATION AND BASE PLATE OF THE POLE, (SEE DETAIL A). 6. POSITION THE POLE ONTO THE ANCHOR BOLTS AND SECURE IN PLACE WITH (4) 03/4" NUTS AND WASHERS, (SEE DETAIL A). 7. LEVEL POLE BY ADJUSTING THE 3/4" NUTS (SEE DETAIL A). 8. INSTALL SWING ARM (SEE DETAIL B) IN TO THREADED HOLES IN POLE, (DO NOT TIGHTEN YET) USING: (5) 112-13 X 1-1/2" HEX BOLTS (5) 1/2" FLAT WASHERS (5) 1/2" LOCK WASHERS 9. ATTACH "DRIVE-TFRU" LETTERS TO TOP OF SWING ARM TO (3) RIVNUTS (LETTERS MUST BE ATTACHED FOR LEVELING) USING: (3) 1/4-20 X 1" SCREW (3) 1/4" LOCK WASHER 10. LEVEL SWING ARM (LIFT OVER LEVEL TIGHTEN SECURELY) LET ARM HANG'- CHECK LEVEL - ADJUST AS NEEDED. 11. ADJUST SPRING TENSION AS NEEDED TO HOLD SWING ARM IN POSITION BY ADJUSTING THE 1/4-20 NUTS ON THE EYE BOLTS (SEE DETAIL B) TIGHTEN JAM NUTS SECURELY WHEN DONE. 12. INSTALL CLADDING PER INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED WITH THE CLADDING. SEE NOTE 1 CLADDING CUTOUT CLEARANCE TO SWINGARM 13. ADJUST THE HEIGHT OF THE BANG TUBE T BE 9 FEET ABOVE THE DRIVE PAVEMENT (GRADE). 13.1 REMOVE CAPS ON BANG TUB 13.2 LIFT TUBE TO CREATE SLACK IN CHAIN 13.3 PULL CHAIN OUT OF END OF TUBE 13.4 MOVE COTTER PIN UP OR DOWN ON THE CHAIN AS NEEDED 13.5 LET TUBE HANG - CHECK HEIGHT 13.5 REPLACE CAPS ON ENDS OF THE TUBE 14. INSTALL HINGE SERVICE COVER -ATTACH WITH: (9) YELLOW 8-18 X 1/2" SL HXWH SCREWS. 15, FILL GAP BETWEEN FOUNDATION AND POLE WITH GROUT (SEE DETAIL A). 16. TOUCH UP POLE AND SWING ARM WITH PAINT SUPPLIED. LANDSCAPE NOTE: Area above the base plate is to remain exposed. No shroud or landscape material should be placed on top of the base plate. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. NAIVE DATE C 1] A r DESIGN NOTES DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES - PRODUCT: MCD ARCADE BUILDING 14.00+ I 1.) ALL CONCRETE EXCEPT CONCRETE USED FOR BACK TOLERANCES: O 010 : DRAWN TRS 121710 WPG ELEMENT FILL SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE FRACTIONAL♦ 118 10.00 5.00 STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. x = • .ob xx= os CHECKED w/ 10" x 10" BASE PLATE A ! 2.) CONCRETE BASE DESIGNED USING GOOD TO AVERAGE xxr.= .ols xxxx=REAM DESIGNED TRS 12/7/0; SOILS HAVING AN ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY ANGULAR MACHINED .5" BEND 1 _ CustSery TITLE: WPG w/ 10" x 10" BASE PLATE 7/8" SLOTTED BOLT HOLE BASE PLATE OF 200 P.S.F./FT. 3.) ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS ARE TO BE FREE OF WATER -- FINISH - - - ENG APPR. INSTALL SCALE 1:16 AND FOREIGN MATTER BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE.,:., . PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL _ 4.) IF THESE CONDITIONS DO NOT EXIST, A NEW BASE i! iE:• THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SIZE DWG. NO, REV MUST BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. _ zAo0II89S isr +#�. .Q, �, `^` DRAWING is THE SOLE PROPERTY OF EVERBRITE. LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN449186S B I$8Lf1i CFflS LIW]�(DSi ➢ NPARTORASAwHOLe 5.) THIS ASSEMBLY AND FOUNDATION IS DESIGNED TO NEXT ASSY USED ON WITHSTAND 150 MPH EXP C WIND LOADS. _ WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NOTES: APPLICATION ooNOT SCALE DRAWING EVERBRITE, LLC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.SCALE: 1:32TYPE: INSTALL SHEET 1 OF 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 C 1] A / 0) c a 0 c 0 c 0) c LLIN U 4) O C) (N rn 0 C 0 A 8 7 6 5 DESIGN NOTES POLE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS: 1.) ALL CONCRETE EXCEPT CONCRETE USED FOR BACK FILL SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. 2.) CONCRETE BASE DESIGNED USING GOOD TO AVERAGE SOILS HAVING AN ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF 200 P.S.F./FT. 3_) ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS ARE TO BE FREE OF WATER AND FOREIGN MATTER BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. 4.) IF THESE CONDITIONS DO NOT EXIST, ANEW BASE MUST BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 5.) THIS SIGN IS DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND 150 MPH EXP C WIND LOADS. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4 STAKE FOUNDATION AREA AND CONFIRM FINAL GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITH G. C. (TOP OF FOUNDATION IS 6" ABOVE PAVEMENT (GRADE) EXCAVATE FOUNDATION AREA. POUR FOUNDATION (030" x 72" DEPTH) INSERT (4) 0314 x 40" ANCHOR BOLTS (PER FIGURE 1). ALLOW CONCRETE CURE TIME AS REQUIRED PLACE (4) 03/4" LEVELING NUTS AND WASHERS ON THE lZiLlIN :E DETAIL A) CURE IN AIL A). A). Rev: €A B C D 8 7 6 5 (4) 03/4" GALVANIZED 40" ANCHOR BOLTS (10" x 10" BOLT PATTERN) 30" x 72" AUGERED HOLE USE (6)#4 VERTICAL REBARS WITH #3 TIES @ 12 O/C (4) 3/4"-10 GALVANIZED 40" LONG ANCHOR BOLT (8) 3/4"-10 HX NUTS (4) 3/4" LOCK WASHERS (8) 3/4" FLAT WASHERS FILL GAP WITH GROUT I --a— 2.00 DETAIL A SCALE 1 :8 ADJUST TO - LEVEL POLE C 0 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED: NAME DATE PRODUCT: MCD ARCADE BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE IfJINCHES TOLERANCES: -7 010 ;DRAWN ILMR ; OAJANOS DOUBLE WPG FRACTIONAL± 1/8 .X = ± .06 .XX = = 03 CHECKED .XXX = ± .015 .XXXX = REAM _ - DESIGNED TRS 9/19/07 A ANGULAR: !MACHINED ± .5° BEND ± I ° __.. .._ .. .,.._ CUSt;Pr„ TITLE: DOUBLE WPG SWING ARM . FINISH ..._.__... __. .._-.. ._.... ....-.. .� ENG APPR. *�iti�R F PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TRIS SIZE DWG NO. REV 1195$ s ® •.. +�.Evoirbrite .... DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF EVERBRITE, LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION I IN4492005 °�`:•+' Idenui .S ems DTvWon ` ` ' Y IN PART OR AS A WHOLE ON + WITHOUT THE VYR TTEN PERMISSION OF .. i _.... .. .. ._.._, .... _ APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING I EVERBRITE, LLC.IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SCALE: 1 :32TYPE: INSTALL SHEET 1 OE 2 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 ri7 C FIGURE 1 B NOTES: Temporarily remove this piece by removing (4) # 10 screws from top and (2) #10 screws from bottom in order to mount swing arm to pole. 5 Remove this cover by removing (6) #8 screws in order to adjust tension in springs. swing arm tension 4 3 2 1 Rev: DESCRIPTION: DATE: APPROVED: A INITIAL RELEASE 04JAN08 B ......... - _ ..._..... ADDED FOUNDATION SPECS. 18FEB08 C CHANGED ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT FROM 1 1 xl l DOUBLE WPG TO 10x10 05JUN08 D ADDED DESIGN NOTES 09JUL08 SWING ARM INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 1 _ REMOVE HINGE SERVICE COVER (SEE FIG.1)(ARM IS SHIPPED WITHOUT LETTERS ATTACHED) 2. SET LETTERS ON TO TOP OF ARM - ALIGN WITH THE (2) RIVNUTS IN LARGE COVER 3. START THE (4) SCREWS FURTHEST FROM CENTER(SEE FIG.2) (LEAVE SCREWS LOOSE) DESIGNED TRS 9/19/07 USING: (2) 1/4-20 X 1 HXHX MS (2) 1/4" LOCK WASHERS 4. LIFT ARM TO POSITION ON POLE 5. MOUNT ARM THROUGH THE (5) HOLES INSIDE THE ARM TO THE TAPPED HOLES IN THE POLE ` c,tsE, (START WITH CENTER BOLT) (DO NOT TIGHTEN SECURELY) USING: (5) 1/2-13 X 1.5" HXHD BOLTS y. .. ... .. (5) 1/2" LOCK WASHERS (5) 1/2" FLAT WASHERS 6. CHECK FOR LEVEL 7. IF LEVEL- SECURELY TIGHTEN THE (5) MOUNTING BOLTS AND (SKIP STEP 8) 8. IF NOT LEVEL - 8.1 LIFT ARM OVER', LEVEL 8.2 TIGHTEN THE (5) BOLTS THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS 8.3 LET ARM HANG REV 8.4 CHECK LEVEL AGAIN DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION 8.5 ADJUST AS NESSESARY 9. CHECK ARM MOTION BY ROTATING ARM; LOOKING FOR SMOOTH OPERATION 10. CHECK SPRING TENSION ON SWING ARM HINGE BY ROTATING ARM APROX 3 FEET AND RELEASING, ARM MUST RETURN TO POSITION (IF IT DOES NOT RETURN TO POSITION; ADD LIGHT OIL TO HINGE) 11. TO ADJUST SPRING TENSION ADJUST THE 1/4-20 NUTS ON THE (3) EYEBOLTS PER SIDE (TIGHTEN SECURELY) 12. INSTALL HINGE SERVICE COVER BY SLIDING IT UNDER THE LETTERS AND INSTALLING WITH: (6) YELLOW 8-18 X.5" HXWHD SCREWS 13. SECURE THE LETTERS - INSTALL (2) 1/4-20 X 1" SCREWS AND (2) 1/4'. LOCK WASHER TO THE INNER MOST MOUNTING HOLES (MUST LINE UP WITH THE RIVNUT IN HINGE SERVICE COVER) 14. SECURLY TIGHTEN ALL (6) 1/4-20 SCREWS ON THE LETTERS 15. TOUCH UP AS NEEDED WITH PAINT SUPPLIED uNLEssorHERwisESPEc1FiEb: NAME. DATE DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES - -- PRODUCT: MCD ARCADE BUILDING , TOLERANCES: F7 .010 DRAWN DAR 04JAN08 DOUBLE WPG I FRACTIONAL* 1/8 .X -± 06 .XX = 03 CHECKED % -XXX = 2 .0I 5 XXXX = REAM r DESIGNED TRS 9/19/07 ANGULAR: -.. .. _. , MACHINED s° _ _ BEND 1° _FINISH ` c,tsE, TITLE: DOUBLE WPG SWING ARM y. .. ... .. ENG APPR. PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL i�+• E THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SIZE DWG. NO, REV ZA0011955 verbrite - - `�y�Bt :•`EVERBRITE, •" • ' Identit S—Ilms DIYL51Dn DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF LLC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN449200S D - NEXT ASSY USED ON i : IN PART OR AS A WHOLE '.. _ WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING EVERBRITE, LLC IS STRICTLYPROHIBITED. SCALE: 1:8 :TYPE: INSTALL i SHEET 2 OF 2 8 7 6 5, 4 3 2 1 C 0 A