Loading...
2019-01-02 Council Work Session PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA January 2, 2019 6:00 pm Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Open Session--Call to Order 2. Discussion with MNDOT - 2018 Changes Made To Dodd Road, at its Intersections with Pagel Road, Decorah, And Wagon Wheel Trail 3. Adjourn To: Mayor and City Council From: Mark McNeill, City Administrator Subject: Workshop— MNDOT Dodd Road Presentation Date: January 2, 2018 Comment: There will be a workshop to precede the regular City Council meeting on Wednesday, January 2, for the purpose of discussing recent traffic engineering changes on Dodd Road. At the December 4th meeting of the City Council, two Mendota Heights residents spoke regarding safety concerns that they see will result from changes made during the 2018 improvements to TH 149. This involved pavement striping, and the construction of a traffic island on Dodd, in the vicinity that road’s intersections with Decorah, Pagel, and Wagon Wheel Trail. As a result, the City Council asked that MNDOT attend a future City Council meeting to explain the reason for the changes. MNDOT representatives will be present at the January 2nd workshop. The meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers. It will begin at 6:00 PM, and must conclude by 6:50 PM, so as to accommodate the start of the regular meeting which begins at 7:00 PM. Mark McNeill City Administrator s xiC t -'t �`"}..�«F:l�. A� x"71 /. ! ✓ -. -- 5%, M Highway 61 North Shore of Lake Superior FHWA Minnesota Division FHWA Minnesota Division r v x 1 t �.� II�� Bypass lanes 180` 50' 200` 180' 1 : 15 Taper Stripe 1 :15 Taper Stripe — 7---1*25 111111-1111Z111111111 777-77 ---------------- ----------- TURN — LANE �— — _ 1 ' I o ' Federal Highway 3 Administration MnDOT Road Design Manual 5-4.01.04 Left-Turn Bypass Lanes If a left-turn lane is not warranted, or if the construction of a left-turn lane is not practical (due to RIW, terrain, etc.), leaving no left-turn treatment as the only other alternative, designers should consider left-turn bypass lanes. The bypass lane shown in figure 54.O1A is for use at "T" intersections. The combination right- turn and bypass lane shown in figure 54.0113 is for use at four-legged intersections. Because of the higher volumes associated with four-legged intersections, left-turn lanes are a more appropriate solution. Bypass lanes at four- legged intersections should only be used after all other solutions have been found impractical and where the cross street volume is love. Exclusive left turn lanes are the most effective and safe way to separate the left-turning from the through traffic streams. Bypass lanes are a convenience or an emergency measure, and are designed for lower speed maneuvering. If a left turn is warranted and practical then it should be built. Bypass lanes are a quick and inexpensive way to make intersections (that would otherwise have no left-turn treatment) more efficient for traffic operation. Designers should take into account that pavement markings for bypass lanes will infringe on the availability of the passing zone. MnDOT Road Design Manual 5-4.01.04 Left-Turn Bypass Lanes If a left-turn lane is not warranted, or if the construction of a left-turn lane is not practical (clue to RIW, terrain, etc.}, leaving no left-turn treatment as the only other alternative, designers should consider left-turn bypass lanes. The bypass lane shown in figure 54.01A is for use at "T" intersections. The combination right- turn and bypass lane shown in figure 5-4.0113 is for use at four-legged intersections. Because of the higher volumes associated with four-legged intersections, left-turn lanes are a more appropriate solution. Bypass lanes at four- legged intersections should only be used after all other solutions have been found impractical and where the cross street volume is low. Exclusive left turn lanes are the most effective and safe way to separate the left-turning from the through traffic streams. Bypass lanes are a convenience or an emergency measure, and are designed for lover speed maneuvering. If a left turn is warranted and practical, then it should be built. Bypass lanes are a quick and inexpensive way to make intersections (that would otherwise have no left-turn treatment) more efficient for traffic operation. Designers should take into account that pavement markings for bypass lanes will infringe on the availability of the passing zone. FHWA Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse 1:11113 . .ut the CMF Clearinghouse Using CMFs Developing CMFs Additional CRASH /1 1N FACTORS CLEARINGHOUSE Search ■ CMF Webinar in Countermeasure Name CMF Tune Up: Resources, methods and real-world applications of CMFs The webinar will take place from 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. ❑n Monday, December 17, 218. Registration can be found HERE. -•� - Search CMFs 0 p crash modification factor (CMF} is used to compute the expected number of crashes Recently Added CMFs after iimplementing a an a rand ar intersection. The Crash Modification Pro�ride a rased meduan Install bicycle lanes Install an intersection Factors Clearinghouse proWides a searchable conf�ict.warnn�.system CMF: {1.49 CI++�F: fl.77 ICINS with ost online database ❑f CMFs along with guidance {...... ) P and resources fln us��� �.i��r-s in road safet cRF: si CRF: 23 mounted..signs...[various Current studies (CMF Clearinghouse) • Bypass lanes - 5% decrease in total crashes - 19% decrease in property damage only crashes - 25% increase in fatal and injury crashes • Dedicated left turn lanes - 42% decrease in total crashes - 29% decrease in fatal and injury crashes /T-% US Dep&*n0ntd1mnWada1ioA F;Merallfthway Administration About !! Resources Briefing Room Contact in Safety About Office of SafetyPrograms Initiativ- Resources C. Search Safe#y FHWA Home I Safety I ProvenCountermeasures Proven Countermeasures, Office of Safety 5�rel ralrasartffoure In 2008, FHWA began promoting certain infrastructure-oriented safety treatments and strategies, chosen based on proven effectiveness and benefits, to encourage widespread implementation by State,tribal, and local transportation agencies to reduce serious injuries and fatalities on American highways. This became known as the Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative_ The list was updated in 2012 and again in 2017. This list of Proven Safety Countermeasures has now reached a total of 20 treatments and strategies that practitioners can implement to successfully address roadway departure, intersection, and pedestrian and bicycle crashes.Among the 20 Proven Safety Countermeasures are several crosscutting strategies that address multiple safety focus areas. Transportation agencies are strongly encouraged to consider these research-proven safety countermeasures. Widespread implementation of the Proven Safety Countermeasures can serve to accelerate the achievement of local, State, and National safety goals. 8 Roadside Design Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Systemic Application of Multiple Leading Pedestrian Interval Local Road Safety Plan Improvement at Curves Intersections Low Cost Countermeasures at Stop-Controlled Intersections 004 SPEED LIMIIT '1 1 USLIIVITS2 Enhanced Delineation and Longitudinal Rumble Strips and Median Barrier Safety Edgegp�q Friction for Horizontal Curves Stripes on Two-Lane Roads 4D 4t P (: C Backplates with Corridor Access Dedicated Left- and Roundabouts Yellow Change Intervals Retrore'lective Borders Management Right-Turn Lanes at Intersections lit .0 1-0edians and Pedestrian Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Road Diet Walkways Road Safety Audit Crossing Islands in Urban and Suburban Areas Medians and Pedestrian Crossing Islands in Urban and Suburban Areas :e x Median and pedestrian crossing Islands near a roundabout Source: www.pedbikeimages_arg!Dan Burden SAFETY (BENEFITS: Raised Median 46% Reduction in pedestrian crashes Pedestrian Crossing Island 56% ° Reduction in pedestrian crashes Pedestrian, steps oul, doesn't see second car not slopping First carstops forpa& ` a'"' ' "' too close blocking visibi lane Cir A AL r n „�,,,v, i��. �� _ � ; .. �� �. .r . . , �,, .�_��w..�,•: � ,. .� � - � - � � �, W � .� ,� 1�' ® '� d e � ��— �- ..,� ., � .m - . � �.. �.: ����� � .. �.�—.W r. Yi a rz � ii�."°°'.,�'d7w1 e � � , ..�,� �� � O,. . �iiY� .'� � - _ ti. �.. a, �; �� ., u � � r W�� M °� ,� �. � ,w t:;r r �<' �, � � t, r, � � ��'�, w r ... _. _ A. — •'-. �� yly i ,� k � . �� _ ��. � �.,rya ... �w. .T, .— ,,.�, � R.. ,a. .u, •� _ am .� �,. ..... ,..—..� .z _._,. �...— � -4. -`- —.r ,� .�.. FF "� , W� m n r �i��.. 1 Y - -- - - ,� :�''�.�d' .. . M}f AY �•• fix; 1 �F P A r Before Road Diets (Roadway Reconfiguration) A ''Road Diet, or roadway reconfiguration, can improve safety, calm traffic. provide better mobility and access for all road users, and enhance overall quality of He. SAFETY BENEFIT: 4-Lane -Lane After 19-47% Reduction in total crashes 14 Benefits of a 3- lane Read A e%b Safety: 4 Lan�Road :Lare R�aJ 3-Lane rcao,`yp col',;se=a 23-5C'c reductio,P�o os =:.oor owed:a L A 4Laneu,div�aeo•a ac a. y; r -s rW f � � i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIII�IlIIIII�I ' Speed: oeo,elhave fou�d e2,4rohAt at_na2,L-ie Recent Hennepin Count} Conversions to 3-Lanes oec•eose 3�4 rroh�,.^=r�a 3�La�e__ I01.,ne,,teo 11 ®■ _ 4 T IialD1Y¢ � Turning. 1 f -- d �., 3 � - z A2-a,ehe•derse,.•es'� a r a r=o,voe:oor.gero veoµi ` 8 mane..e°e•_.ano reo•-=,a a s-^ea. rix P Multimodal -.r Y 4. - 03 0 m �� Transportation: la .. a d 5 � c• .. ,�„. � to' ,Vri t 7 es o VIII Familiarity: ~ Initall .so-ngeor _ r a-r :--rfuse-d raora rqt,t kf=r^e � rf 12 s�o nxr.ar�a,cr.ar.aa d bee,c,t. Traffic Capacity: a 60 , 411 7 •'� I- - 3r: - Wo- de ore a5. }._, � � � _ 2i � �r :To,ie e=:}.. - j.:, ,-e,:eotc�s P A 3 orhigh.a.oy in ::: �=3 Vane _- 4 �,.a y,eeds c ...c'Ie�-e�fle��a:i`, '� . :.,. ,.. ddi+ono ihro- c�torr+o,esfor �� rof-lo-:acao ty reOso, M .;Winona County►A First Baptist Chuchhsto-rical Society. r P WknonaDMV Office t"IMS Donald Windom Park MII� S Li bvMy , « . u 11-0 Iwv.1' Y 21 'r god Winona Public I ibrar err ; B. rN +ir X �� United States C3 y w _ Posta Service sh � J n �� .'-. yyay,� as a 'W a o r a w. c Central l u#heran ChLirch -.>{ .� Central px—t W� t ' h ffi. n e r 'w4 w Admissions Office lj �# 410 cti Cathedral of S ` ° Goog'�� ► acred Heart � . • ' • . 111 • � 11 • • � • X11 • • Safer streets, safer people : Winona looks at improving safety of major corridors ",IARC APrTLIF==ai t' 4Ew5. Maya.":_= 0,E • Donate$100 p ." uw Astudyeariierthisyearfnur,, __ _ c FH L rocs r u _7s=�_ tdtvay,Huff,andMainstreetscanbeunsafefarpedestrians BUY NOW and bicalists..The IAISis+w,:_ :;eia:erasas,<e e:itytocreate anEwgrouptostudy safety measures along the _s' _ =_e's =_ __ =_amus follming�; Mct.l4crash that left astudent pedestrian with critical injuries_ e., RECOMMENDED f $ p ,- Corridor study presentation WHAT:A presentation onthe Drivers can go too fast on Broadway,Huff and Main streets in BroadwsyfHufffMainStreet Winona,resulting less-than-Ideal conditions for pedestrians and 17 Corridor Study toimprove V-.-+7h-.L -Cc, bicyclists. P a The Latest:Thm Georgria'd pedestrianandbicycVe ................1� Cii 7n�JC nn Pnrl in h,ICS(-nn, 4-3 vote • move forward Winona City Council • 4 � .�,�4r ■� .,r PPPPPP .� y Proportion of Fatalities by Road User, 1975-2017 10 $0% 9C% 71% 80% 70% 102 We V0101e:00CUpanto of cars. Iight trucks, Iarip trucks,bl,jses and other wehIola& say OulsideVehicle; Motorcycl I sts. pedestrIane, bIopIists anal other non-occupants OX 4 1 31y% 20% 10 % 0% 1975 1977 1979 1951 19M 1195 19&7 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 7003 2009 2007 2409 2011 2013 2015 2017 Inside Vehicle -&-Outside Vehicle Source: FABS s r, : t � .. " k Highway Highway 65 (Central) g Y 47 610 fi5 n Creek a7 <Reserve 10 Lexington 81 16 61 9 fOi Northtown Mall 4 610 Rice Creek North North Osseo Regional Trail Corridor h Hennepin 2s2 Y Community s Spring 0 , k of 0 College � Lake Park Mounds View ❑ ❑ 'ove ,69 Brooklyn Park 66 North Oaks ib Brooklyn Shoreview 169 C252Fridley Center 65 10 to New Brighton a Vadnais Heights Columbia 0 ® Arden Hills Heights New Hape19 _ Sl ❑Q Crystal Robbinsdale ss � Little Canada 164 NOR1H ASI nthony MINN EAP©LIS Gdr<igleST 36 35 en rr.uwcn�ni rc r.___..ru_ 21 e, � r1 ,o- A -- s- „ r J o cr » y, ■, � \ ( } . e f . Va ... Ammon& . , . 40ma low, \ ¥ /Ll ' � I ■�° � 1 » � Teens hit in St. Francis crash remain in hospital , community ells for safer intersection Teens - hospital h I - By;Courtney Godfrey POSTED:NOV21 2C ___--="I CST VIDEO POSTED:NC';_'__'3-_:13PKI CST UPDATED.NOV 22=- _-_-_F.1 CS ST FRANCIS,Minn_(KMSP)-Two teenagers,are recuuering after they were hit by a vehicle in St. Francis Tuesday night. According to the Anoka County Sheriffs Office,Annie LaMotte and Kaia Bollman. bath 14,were crossing Highway 47 at Pedersen Drive NW around 6 p.m.when they were hit. LaMotte has been upgraded to stable condition. while(Bollman is still in critical condition. The crosswalk bridges St. Francis Middle School and a shopping center. It crosses four lanes of traffic 24 where the speed limit is 50 miles per hour. - � . ,. ;�.e,,.... n _ ,. �f��--fir / • St Francis Rlv NW St Francs Blvd NW n F„ .. ffiy 234Ave NW, p•:�a° 3�'dl i 233rd L;N .;' St.Francis t3pttl Sh4 - ` &Reiliy,Au o Pa wJe , . 2nd lo raw zazrodar€Nxv ti A6t7e Field ry rl 44 a - { y d To r.ritiou- s a ;aa . -- i Deer Cree . , k •, 2nd Pork Q x Kirig 5 Count81�{@t T 2-32nd Ave Z ,, r I manaetti s Pizza& - Pasta Saint Francis School Subway Restaurants w• :; St. Francis Middle School � r " Rurn Riv81r�-� L F. Casey's G ' Nn.,nsn, St Francis 4L 41r Elementary School 229th c°Ne.' � , X 72er Creek - is Park �w. Trinity Lutheran Schou IN IN F c..i k ',, Martie s Farm Services St Frdn P F no]S Polt m Google DE30 Top 1 0 Leading Causes of Death in the United States in 20115, by Age Group' NHTSA r+laiianal Highway Traffic Safety Admin istrauon�s National Cenaar lar Sta9is9ics and Analysis m R Cause and Number of Deaths Years Zr A Young Young Other Adults of N Infants Toddlers Children Children Youth Adults Elderly Life M� K Under 1-3 4-7 8-15 16x,20 21-24 25-4U 35 4 45414 65+ All Ages Lost' M Perinatal Congenital Malignant Accidental Malignant Malignant Heart Heart Malignant E' 1 Period Anomalies Neoplasms Poisoning Neoplasms Neoplasms Disease Disease Neoplasms rn 11.613 389 360 11,231 10,909 159,17-, 507,133 633,842 23%(0;426,310) i Congenital Malignant Accidental Accidental Heart Malignant Malignant �. Homicide Suicide Suicide Heart Disease 2 Anomalies 329 Neoplasms 2 441 Poisoning 6 947 Poisoning Disease Neoplasms Neoplasms 193°(7.767 386) 4,825 594 2,828 10;580 111,120 419,389 595,938 m Hirt Accidental Congenital Suicide Homicide Suicide Heart Chronic Liver CLRD' CLRD' CLRD1 3 Disease Drowning Anomalies Disease Disease 292 316 168 663 2,4}27 2,798 10,387 22,152 131,884 155;041 5°6(1,880;774) Ei Malignant Accidental Accidental Accidental 4 Homicide Homicide Drowning Homicide poisoning Homicide Homicide Suicide CLRD Stroke Stroke Poisoning T. 263 273 163 307 1,075 '2,601 4,863 6,936 1311,804 120,156 140,323 4%(1,832,709) MY Traffic Congenital Malignant Malignant Malignant Septicemia Homicide Diabetes Alzheimer's Apheimer's Suicide 5 Anomalies Neoplasms Neoplasms Neoplasms 180 136 9-0378261 614 747 3,704 -378 109,495 110,561 4°6(1,553;110) Influenza' Heart Exposureto Heart Heart Heart Heart A��iaental Homicide Diabetes Diabetes Stroke 6 Pneumonia Disease Smoke/Fire Disease Disease Disease Disease 2.895 PoRsoning 142 79.535 4Gc 11.528.047) 6 174 132 70 202 352 607 3,522 19 452 °i Stroke MV Nordraitic Heart Accidental Accidental Accidental Chronic Liver Chronic Liner Stroke Influenza/ Influenza/ MV Traffic ❑ 7 89 Crashes Disease Drowning Drowning Drowning Disease Disease 17423 Pneumonia Pneumonia Crashes 88 61 160 261 218 844 2,861 48,774 57,062 3%(1,349,898) L Nephritis/ Influenza' CLRDS CLRI9a Congenital Congegital Diabetes Diabetes Suicide Nephritis! Nephritis) Diabetes @ 8 Nephrosis Pneumonia Anomalies Anomalies Nephrosis Nephrosis c 85 76 55 1K5 181 159 798 11,986 16,490 41,258 49,959 3%(1,237,459) MIV[➢then! MV Altherr" MV Other! MV'Other. MV Traffic Exposure to Accidental Chronic Liver Nontrafli'c Nantraffic Nantraffic Nontraific Stroke Stroke Septicemia 9 SmokelFire , , , Poisoning Disease 73 Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes 567 1,788 r,� 30,81757 47,478 2%(940,717) Cf I 43 91 101 129 Malignant Perinatal Influenzal Exposureto Accidental Accideq'.al accidental Perinatal HIV HIV Septicemia Suicide 1D Neoplasms Penud� Pneumonia Smoke/Fire Falls Falls Falls Period 53 45 411 69 83 128 529 1,055 8,316 28,486 44,1'93 2%(922,0 ALL' 23-455 3,376 2,096 4,995 12,461 16,942 51,517 73.088 532,279 1,992;283 2,712;630 All Causes 100%(41,462,779) 27 r i iN3.bF?3 FrL L r �eor v 28 n ^� Decorah Ln Iecrafr L, Q alak heel Trail Wagon Wheel Trail _ m 3. O 2 poctiac p 3 ." . Cheri Ln ;0 CL r w - r eO�v1c Ln Keokuk L.n BIuebill Dr Keow-1 � c CL a Goggle T-- 30 n SE Q � 91170 LIar. nL � r lvl'�ndota Heights 6 t °� � ¢"tom•�' ���'� ,�` Po hip ri. a, , ' z� La E # 168 , r