The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-05-16 Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA May 16, 2017 – 7:00 pm Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adopt Agenda 5. Consent Agenda a. Approve May 2, 2017 City Council Minutes b. Approve May 8, 2017 Council Work Session Minutes c. Approve May 9, 2017 Joint Council/Park-Rec Commission Work Session Minutes d. Approve Sub-Contract Agreement for Back-Up Building Inspections Services e. Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Beth Jacob Congregation f. Approve Resolution 2017-38, Regarding Support for Local Decision Making Authority g. Approve Administrative Interim Use Permit – 750 South Plaza Drive h. Acknowledge Building Activity Report for April 2017 i. Acknowledge April 2017 Fire Synopsis j. Approve April 2017 Treasurer’s Report k. Approve Claims List 6. Public Comments 7. Presentations – none 8. Public Hearings – none 9. New and Unfinished Business a. Resolution 2017-36 Accept Bids & Award Contract for 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project b. Resolution 2017-37 Accept Bids and Award Contract for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements 10. Community Announcements 11. Council Comments 12. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, May 2, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Garlock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmembers Duggan, Miller, Petschel, and Paper were also present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Garlock presented the agenda for adoption. Councilmember Petschel moved adoption of the agenda. Councilmember Paper seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Garlock presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilmember Petschel moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein, pulling items a) Approval of April 18, 2017 City Council Minutes, b) Approve Personnel Action – Acceptance of Police Officer Resignation, e) Rogers Lake Aquatic Weed Treatment, and with the correction of the typo in g) Approve Ordinance 509 Amending City Code Section 7-2 Fire Code. a. Approval of April 18, 2017 City Council Minutes b. Approve Personnel Action – Acceptance of Police Officer Resignation - Jennifer Fordham c. Approve Resolution 2017-34 Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation d. Approve Resolution 2017-33 Calling for Public Hearing on MnDOT Highway 149 Rehabilitation Project e. Rogers Lake Aquatic Weed Treatment f. Approve Out of State Travel Request – Fire Chief g. Approve Ordinance 509 Amending City Code Section 7-2 Fire Code page 2 h. Acknowledge March 2017 Building Activity Report i. Approval of March 2017 Treasurer’s Report j. Approval of Claims List Councilmember Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEM A) APPROVAL OF APRIL 18, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Councilmember Duggan noted that he felt that a lot of material shared at the meeting was omitted from the minutes, in particular comments made by Councilmembers and the audience that should be recognized. Councilmember Petschel requested that Councilmember Duggan work with staff to have the comments he felt should be included added to the minutes. Councilmember Duggan agreed. Councilmember Petschel moved approval of the minutes with amendments to be made by Councilmember Duggan. Mayor Garlock seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 B) APPROVE PERSONNEL ACTION – ACCEPTANCE OF POLICE OFFICER RESIGNATION Councilmember Petschel commented that it is with much sadness that the Council accepts the resignation of Police Officer Jennifer (Fordham) Larrive effective May 12, 2017. She noted that Officer Fordham has been one of the finest school resource officers that this City and school district have had. Councilmember Miller, having worked with Officer Fordham in her capacity as a school liaison officer at Henry Sibley, echoed Councilmember Petschel’s comments and noted that she will be missed by staff and the students at Henry Sibley. Councilmember Petschel moved to accept with regret the resignation of Jennifer (Fordham) Larrive as Police Officer for the City of Mendota Heights, effective May 12, 2017. Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 E) ROGERS LAKE AQUATIC WEEK TREATMENT Councilmember Miller asked Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek to comment on why the Rogers Lake homeowners association was dissatisfied with the previous year’s water treatment. Mr. Ruzek replied page 3 that he had spoken with the president of the Rogers Lake Property Owners Association, who reported that they felt that some of the treatments on their individual lots were lacking. Mr. Ruzek said that as a City, staff has noticed good weed prevention in some of navigable waters and along the fishing pier. The City received quotes from licensed applicators through the DNR; those quotes were provided to the Rogers Lake Property Owners Association. The homeowners association chose to go with a new company to see if it would work for them. Councilmember Petschel stated that this is a line item in the City’s budget and is something to review this year depending on satisfaction with the treatments and costs. Mr. Ruzek noted that the water quality of Rogers Lake is being monitored and if staff starts to see deterioration, the City would immediately cease the treatments. Councilmember Miller asked if the City has looked at expanding a similar program to other ponds. Mr. Ruzek replied that ponds are green because of nutrients which get into them. He said that previous Councils have discussed expanding the treatments, but have limited it to three lakes and not individual ponds due to budget constraints. He said that homeowners are welcome to form their own neighborhood groups and apply for a DNR permit, but they would not be sponsored by the City on local ponds. Councilmember Miller asked if the ponds abutting parklands could be considered for treatment by the City. Mr. Ruzek replied that residents could approach the City in those situations and that would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Councilmember Duggan noted that 10 to 12 years ago, a survey was completed of all of the ponds and the total came to approximately 96. The Council considered treatment to the top 25 (approx.) and that was not desirable either. It was decided to treat only the three lakes. Another question raised at that time was where to start the treatments--closer to the river, or closer to the beginning of the water flow? That was never answered satisfactorily. Councilmember Petschel clarified that approximately six years ago, the City completed random pond testing. If a pond is functioning as it should, it may not look as attractive as someone thinks it should but from a water quality testing aspect it could be functioning quite well. The ponds tested were all functioning with a passing grade. More recently, she said that there have been changes at the state level as far as possible regulations to impose on cities. The Council has been reluctant to spend money on ponds until we know what the state mandates are going to be. When new state guidelines are set, that is something the City will have to deal with. Councilmember Petschel noted that the residents around Stone Lake did their own treatments. Councilmember Duggan noted that the organization that does the treatments, uses a natural enzyme that does not degrade the water quality, and that the lake is now not too bad. Mr. Ruzek added that consultant WSB and Associates is completing a surface water management plan for the City. Part of this surface water management plan is evaluating the efficiency of every single pond in the City. Once this report is finished, it will be presented to Council for comment. This report is timed with the Comprehensive Plan updates. page 4 Councilmember Petschel moved to continue the weed control program with the cost share proposed by the RLPOA, as proposed by Lake Improvement Consulting, LLC, for the total cost of $4,535; with the city paying $1,535, and the homeowners association paying $3,000 Councilmember Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PRESENTATIONS No items scheduled. PUBLIC HEARING No items scheduled. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS RESOLUTION 2017-35 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE CREATION OF A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR THE MENDOTA MOTEL/LARSON GREENHOUSE SITE City Administrator Mark McNeill explained that this Redevelopment District is for two adjacent properties; the Mendota Motel and the former Larson Greenhouse. The properties are located at 2160 and 2180 Highway 13. The properties would be consolidated into a single Redevelopment District. The City has been working with a potential developer, Michael Development, towards renovation of the site that would involve site acquisition and soil cleanup. The development costs make this financially unfeasible; therefore, the developer is requesting assistance from the City by way of tax increment financing. Staff anticipates that there would be 10 years of tax forgoing on the part of the City, the school district, and the county. Those dollars would go to reimburse the developer for his up-front costs in redeveloping the property. The action before the Council is a request to pass a resolution calling for a public hearing. The public hearing would take place on June 20, 2017, with a notice sent to the school district and to Dakota County so they are able to submit any comments. Councilmember Duggan asked, referring to “the proposed modification to the Development Program for Municipal Development District No. 1, the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2” as stated in the proposed resolution, if maps would be made available so the Council knows page 5 where is District 1 and where is District 2. Administrator McNeill pointed out the location and explained that whatever maps the Council needs would be provided. Referring to the Schedule of Events that reads, “City Council approves the Modification to the Development Program for Municipal Development District No. 1”, Councilmember Duggan asked if Council would receive a copy of the development program. Administrator McNeill replied in the affirmative. Councilmember Duggan suggested that somewhere along the line, referencing to the schedule of events, that someone create a seven to ten history of the taxes on both properties for consideration – to help the Council make a determination. Administrator McNeill replied that this information would be provided as requested. Councilmember Duggan, referencing the schedule of events, asked what an Inter-fund Loan is. Administrator McNeill replied that an Inter-fund Loan would allow the City to set up tax increment financing and get reimbursed for some of its expenses. Councilmember Duggan would also appreciate it if the Finance Director could keep separate records of all of the legal costs involved that the City would pay. Administrator McNeill replied that this is why the City is establishing a tax increment district, so that the City can get reimbursed for its costs. Councilmember Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2017-35, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR. Mayor Garlock seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Petschel moved to call for a Council work session to be held at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 16, 2017, to discuss this item further. Councilmember Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RESOLUTION 2017-31 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RANDY AND BECKY PENTEL, 815 DEER TRAIL COURT Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that this request was for a Conditional Use Permit by Randy and Becky Pentel, 815 Deer Trail Court. The Pentel residence consists of just over 0.67 acres with a 4,670 square foot dwelling with a 784 square foot, 3 car attached garage. The Pentels are looking at adding a 690 square foot addition to their existing garage from 784 square feet to 1,473 square feet. As part of the City’s ordinance, a single family home is allowed up to 1,200 square feet of page 6 garage space without any special provisions or permissions; 1,200 – 1,500 square feet requires a Conditional Use Permit. Director Benetti explained that the plan is to add the additional space on the east side of the existing garage. They intend to remove the 9-foot wide door, add the addition, and install a second 16-foot wide door. Currently, the code says that a resident can have up to 36 linear feet of garage doors. Director Benetti also noted that the garage would have an upper level and a lower level. They plan to excavate under the existing garage space and under the new garage space, allowing for additional storage under the garage. It was indicated that no part of the bottom level could be used as ‘garage’ space. The plan is to add an access point to the bottom level from the basement level of their home. Councilmember Miller asked if the neighbors were notified. Director Benetti confirmed that the neighbors had been informed and staff has not received any comments, either for or against. Councilmember Duggan asked if this requires an earth movement permit. Director Benetti replied that usually that type of permit would be required if they were spreading the excavated dirt out, changing the grade or elevations around the new addition. However, this could be easily handled under the requirements of the new building permit. Councilmember Duggan noted that on the east side, the land drops off. He asked if this would cause a problem. Director Benetti replied that it does not at this point. Councilmember Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2017-31, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RANDY & BECKY PENTEL AT 815 DEER TRAIL COURT. Councilmember Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RESOLUTION 2017-32 APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF THE OAKS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, 2511 – 2525 CONDON COURT Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that this request was submitted by Mr. Dick Bjorklund. The property is located at 2511 and 2525 Condon Court, consisting of two parcels. On July 27, 2015 a Preliminary Plat had been approved to accommodate for two twin-home parcels and a single- family parcel. The only change added was a request to Mr. Bjorklund to modify the corner of the parcel from the northern lot that he plans to keep and build his own home on, to accommodate for additional utilities. He said that the delay from 2015 to now was that the owner needed to bring utilities to the site. He has worked that out, so all of the sanitary, electrical, and utilities will be provided for as part of this project. Councilmember Duggan asked for clarification of item 2 in the resolution that reads, “The proposed final plat meets the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code, including proposed uses, lot size, lot width and setbacks”; however, the next sentence reads, “The lot widths for Lots 1, 2, and 3 meet the intent of page 7 the Code in terms of access and adequate spacing, even though they do not meet the letter of the Code definition.” Director Benetti replied that he believed that the access points onto Condon Court were smaller than the code requires. However, the approval was made back in 2015 to allow for developer to acquire a segment of land from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) in order make the individual lots meet the minimum lot size, and which also provide adequate frontage space along Condon Court. Staff believes that this is still consistent with the Preliminary Plat. Councilmember Duggan moved to adopt RESOLUTION 2017-32, APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE OAKS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2511 AND 2525 CONDON COURT. Mayor Garlock seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Dick Bjorklund came forward and expressed his appreciation to the Council for approving the Final Plat as it took four years to get to this point. He also noted that it was a pleasure to work with Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek and Community Development Director Tim Benetti. COUNCIL DIRECTION OF A PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW PYLON/FREESTANDING SIGNS IN THE B-1 AND B-1A COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Community Development Director Tim Benetti explained that this was a request from staff for Council direction. Staff received a request from a local business owner located in the B-1A zone. He owns an office building and has requested a pylon or free-standing sign for his business. Staff realized that the code does not allow free-standing signs in the B-1A district. However, there are a number of these signs located in the B-1 and B-1A districts. The current code does allow pylon or freestanding signs in the B- 2, B3, and B-4 districts. Director Benetti shared an image of where the B-1 and B-1A zoning districts are located and shared images of various pylon/free-standing signs. If the Code change is recommended, approval of this would be presented at a public hearing at the May 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting and, if approval is recommended, it would be brought back to the City Council for adoption on June 6, 2017. Councilmember Petschel commented that there has been growing pains in the City in regards to signage and gave various examples. She expressed her hope that Director Benetti would address size, materials, setbacks, and lighting as part of this ordinance change. Councilmember Duggan requested to see what other areas of the City include B-1 and B-1A zones that would be impacted. Director Benetti shared the City’s Official Zoning Map and pointed out the five areas. Councilmember Duggan asked if there was a way of distinguishing between a pylon or freestanding sign and a monument sign in the ordinance. Director Benetti replied that the ordinance could be written in any way chosen and be amended in any way chosen. Councilmember Petschel moved to direct staff to proceed with a proposed zoning ordinance amendment to certain parts of City Code Title 12-1D-15: Signs, specifically allowing pylon or freestanding signs in the B-1 Limited Business and B-1A Business Park Districts. page 8 Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 AUTHORIZE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE COMPLETION OF A JOB CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY Assistant City Administrator Cheryl Jacobson presented a request to authorize a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the completion of a classification and compensation study. She further noted that as part of complying with the Local Government Pay Equity Act, the City is required to maintain a Classification and Compensation Plan to serve as the basis for pay equity. She said that every three years the City is required to analyze its pay structure for evidence of inequities and to report to Minnesota Department of Management and Budget the results of this analysis. The City’s next pay equity report is due in January, 2018. While the City has been in compliance in previous pay equity reports, a comprehensive classification and compensation review has not been completed for a number of years. The City is currently using a job evaluation system that was retired in the 1980’s. As new job classifications and job descriptions have been received, staff has modified the job evaluation system incrementally to account for those changes. The RFP would invite qualified consultants to submit responses for the completion of a study. The scope of the services include review of the current job descriptions as well as the classifications, the establishment of a job evaluation system, a review of its internal equity, as well as its market competitiveness with comparable cities within the area. The RFP also asks the selected consultant to complete the City’s Pay Equity Report for submittal in January 2018, which would allow the City to test out the new job evaluation system and the new points system for classification against the pay equity requirements. If approved, the project would start in June, 2017 and be completed in October, 2017. Assistant Administrator Jacobson noted that any changes recommended from the study would need to be implemented by the end of the year. Councilmember Petschel asked if the Pay Equity R eport is due in January 2018, then when would salary adjustments become effective? City Administrator McNeill replied that if the City does have to make modifications, it can be done as late as December 31, 2017 and still be in compliance for the January reporting time. An allocation for salary adjustments will be put into the 2018 budget. He also stated that the four unions are up for negotiations later this year. Councilmember Duggan asked if the evaluation would only be for non-union positions or for all employees. Assistant Administrator Jacobson replied that the RFP is looking at non-union positions. The City is required to inform and be transparent with the labor unions with any changes that are made. The pay structure for the union positions is a result of negotiations. page 9 Councilmember Duggan asked if the Employee Demographics, under the section titled Background, that indicates that the City currently employs 38 full-time employees and 6 part-time employees – are these the people that are being addressed in relation to this RFP. Assistant Administrator Jacobson replied that that is the full count of staff and is an overview of what the City employment looks like. Councilmember Duggan suggested a ‘not to exceed’ built into the RFP. Administrator McNeill noted that staff would like to ensure that they get a functioning project. Assistant Administrator Jacobson noted that under the cost proposal description, a ‘not to exceed’ cost breakdown of the firm’s rates is included. Councilmember Petschel moved to authorize the Request for Proposals for the completion of a Job Classification and Compensation Study. Mayor Garlock seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 SET CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DATE FOR GOAL SETTING SESSION City Administrator McNeill recommended the Council have a facilitated goal setting session, to identify and prioritize goals through December 2018. He noted that a colleague of his has offered to facilitate this goal setting session for the City at no cost. That individual has done this for another city and produced a product that Administrator McNeill feels the Council would be happy with. Mayor Garlock noted that since three Councilmembers are relatively new, this goal setting session would be a good idea. Administrator McNeill noted that the suggested timeframe for this meeting would be four hours. The Councilmembers set the date/time for this goal setting session for Monday, May 22 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Duggan applauded the Council for the in depth discussions that were had over the last three months. He met a couple of Police Officers that came to his house. He was very impressed that the officers showed up to check on his home. He acknowledged Police Chief McCarthy for the progress in the Police Department. Councilmember Duggan suggested that staff give an update on the Mendota Plaza construction. He said that he has paid close attention several times to the discussion on the group homes and he felt that a lot of comments were made were not included in the minutes. It’s a challenging situation and the Council is somewhat limited in what they can do. He pointed out that the City can make changes to these ordinances and languages that come from the state; they just have to be done in the right way. He suggested a letter be sent to our legislators expressing the City’s concerns. page 10 He pointed out that Mr. Tom Novitsky has gone through a lot of trouble to review state statute language. Councilmember Duggan has gone to many Metropolitan Council meetings and this has always been a bone of contention; however, no one seems to be willing to take a leadership role. He believed something could be done to alleviate the situation. He believes the City does have a case – especially when the concept of neighborhood is thought of. He said that limits on the number of residential facilities could be set; however, the City has to work through the legislature to get that to happen. He believes Minneapolis has a separate agreement whereby group homes cannot be closer than a quarter of a mile apart. Councilmember Duggan expressed his thoughts on The Village development. He was glad that the Council had the fortitude to say no to a five-story building in a residential area. If the character of a neighborhood is going to change dramatically, as he felt that a five story building would have, then that is against all of the people that have come to live in Mendota Heights. He felt that that has to be taken into consideration. The answer he gets from most people is that they like the design of The Village; the challenge is how to fit in the rest of it. He believes the Council needs to establish a traffic report of Dodd and 110; particularly north of 110, so the Council could then compare what is now and also take into consideration a large development at The Village. “Livability and Walkability” is how and why The Village was developed initially. He continued by stating that ‘misinformation’ was mentioned during the discussion about The Village and noted that one of the things that should be remembered is that if someone were to establish a business, they should be expected to expend funds for studies, feasibility, and other reports in relation to establishing a business. That is part of the cost of doing business. It would be reflected in the rents they charge or however they sell their product. He said that Mr. (Greg) Konat and others made excellent points at the previous meeting, and he has asked the Council to review and work with the comments that were made at the meeting so that everyone could have them going forward to another meeting. He asked what the Council is going to do to preserve and maintain the city that they love. The Council needs to be thinking along those terms; and the community needs to be invited to join in those discussions. Sometimes developers do not like what the City tells them they have to do or should do. He believes it is appropriate for the City to do that because it is ‘our’ city. Councilmember Duggan stated he still believes Mendota Heights is a ‘gem of a city’. However, he does not believe it is the task of the City to provide retirement homes, active homes or otherwise, in the community for everyone who wants to retire there. He said that that is not the goal, the job, or the challenge of a city. Councilmember Paper congratulated Henry Sibley High School for making the top 30 in the US News & World Report in academics. He also expressed his appreciation to Police Officer Jennifer (Fordham) Larrive for her service and wished her luck at the state level. page 11 Councilmember Miller echoed Councilmember Paper’s comments about Officer Larrive as she will be missed and he wished her the best as well. He pointed out that Friday is Cinco de Mayo and reminded residents of a great Mexican restaurant just down the street, Teresa’s at The Plaza. Mayor Garlock commented that he worked with Police Officer Jennifer (Fordham) Larrive for 13 years. She served at Henry Sibley for ten years. Her work at Henry Sibley High School and with Special Olympics should not go unnoticed. She will be deeply missed. Councilmember Petschel mentioned Jimmy Reagan, and his parents Brian and Peg Reagan who live in our community. She said that Jimmy was diagnosed with autism when he was two. After many years of struggling with his physical and mental health, almost completely by accident, he was introduced to painting. Through painting, Jimmy found his voice. He loved painting and studying various painters. If one sees his work they will see that he has been very much influenced by Vincent Van Gogh in terms of the way he lays paint on his canvases and the way that he uses color. His works have been displayed locally, nationally, and internationally. There is also a Facebook page that is called “Through Jimmy’s Eyes”. This is the way for him to tell everyone this is how he sees the world. She announced that as of May 18, at a store called Debut in the Mall of America, there are various accessories for sale that have been created using Jimmy’s artwork. She encouraged everyone to stop in. She also expressed her appreciation to the legal team of Eckberg & Lammers, who put on a wonderful seminar on April 27th, which encompassed everything the City has been dealing with – code enforcement, street assessments, and guidelines on how to deal with these issues and making dealing with them perhaps in a more uniformed way. The nice thing was that the other cities they represent were all present. She noted that there is nothing that Mendota Heights has experienced that is not experienced in other cities. She took notes and there are a couple of things she would like to follow-up on in terms of code enforcement and assessments during the goal setting session. Councilmember Petschel also shared that a number of years ago (2014), MSP airport was struggling with the whole concept of Area Navigation, which is precision navigation – flying by computer and GPS. The FAA had some ideas for implementing precision navigation departures here and it was met with resistance from the surrounding communities. However, that is a federal mandate. The Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) drafted a document of what the FAA needed to accomplish if they were going to implement Area Navigation. The FAA was also asked to consider implementing ‘continuous descent approach’, which is precision navigation on the landings. The MAC is very proud of this document; it passed unanimously at the NOC, passed unanimously at the MAC, was not unanimously supported by the ARC (Airport Relations Commission) and was not unanimously supported by the City Council. Since that time, that document has become a roadmap for every other city in the United States in terms of how do we implement Area Navigation over their city. As of today, 80% of the planes approaching our airport are using continuous descent procedure. The belief is that since they are gliding, they are using less fuel and it reduces the carbon footprint. page 12 She said that the Noise Oversight Committee had charged the MAC staff with finding ways to prove the fuel savings and the reduction in the carbon footprint. MAC developed a “Slope Tool”, which is now going to be used nationally, to assess who is using continuous descent approach, which aircraft, and how much fuel is being saved, and how much carbon is not being put in the atmosphere. The results are out and the information can now be quantified. As a result, the slope tool itself and the efforts made by the MAC staff received an award from the Airports Council of America, an international award from the Airport Council International, and the Environmental Achievement Award. They are now saving 2.9 million gallons of fuel a year and they are burning 28,465 fewer metric tons of carbon emissions in to the atmosphere surrounding the airport. She said that she is very proud of this accomplishment. She said that it is a story of – do you really have convictions and are you willing to see those convictions through despite push backs, if you really are convinced this is for the great good of the metro area or the City of Mendota Heights. She expressed her admiration for the staff or elected representatives that she served with. It was one of the most honorable, honest, candid, talented group of people that she has ever worked with. Councilor Petschel said that she is a different person because of that experience. ADJOURN Councilmember Petschel moved to adjourn. Councilmember Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mayor Garlock adjourned the meeting at 8:27 p.m. ____________________________________ Neil Garlock Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Lorri Smith City Clerk page 13 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Council Workshop Monday, May 8, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a workshop of the Mendota Heights City Council was held at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Garlock called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Councilmembers Duggan, Miller, and Paper were also present. Councilmember Petschel joined the meeting at 2:45 p.m. Staff in attendance included City Administrator Mark McNeill, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Community Development Director Tim Benetti, City Attorney Andy Pratt and City Clerk Lorri Smith. VILLAGE LOTS Administrator McNeill provided background on three vacant City-owned lots which are part of The Village at Mendota Heights development. Representatives from Trammell Crow Company were present including John Carlson, Principal; Mary Lucas, Associate Development and Investment; Gretchen Camp, from ESG Architecture and Design. Vern Sling, representing Spack Consulting, joined the meeting at 2:40 p.m. Trammell Crow Company has provided the City with a purchase and sales agreement for this property. Mr. Carlson updated the Council on where Trammell Crow is at with the development of this site. They addressed the Council’s and the residents’ concerns of size and scope of the proposed building, and the impact of additional traffic on Dodd. Representatives from Trammell Crow have set a meeting with the residents of the Linden Street Homeowners Association to hear their concerns and answer their questions about the proposed development. The community meeting that was scheduled for May 15, 2017, has been postponed, and will be rescheduled to a future date. The site plan for the development was discussed. The representatives presented a change to the proposed five-story apartment building, and showed how it would look if it were four stories. They stated they would be willing to pay for or share the cost for a traffic study to be completed on Dodd Road. The building will have two stories of underground parking available for the tenants and their guests. There are eleven parking spaces located near the front entrance. The parking ratio for this development will be 1.3 stalls per unit. Councilmember Duggan questioned if the developer had considered two buildings, instead of one large building. John Carlson replied that they did consider this and found that the costs increase significantly with this approach. He stated that they have found that the vacation of Maple Street would not have a significant impact on the traffic counts on Dodd Road. page 14 Councilmember Duggan questioned the age restriction for the residents. John Carlson stated that the residents will be 55 or older. John Carlson reviewed other changes made to the plan. The building will have approximately 150 units as proposed before, but the units will be slightly smaller. The Councilmembers requested that the fourth floor units be stepped back from the third floor, to soften the look of the building. Mr. Carlson said that the average rent will be from $1,800 to $3,000 per month. The elevation of the four story building will be at 923.5 feet, and that the elevation of the five story building had been proposed to be at 934 feet. Councilmember Miller requested a drawing of how the four story building would look from Dodd Road. The Councilmembers discussed the closing of Maple Street and how the intersection will need to be controlled. A roundabout was discussed. Councilmember Petschel emphasized that the Council must find a solution for the heavy traffic on Dodd Road, and that the City may have to pay for the solution. She questioned if the Council could consider moving Maple Street to the north. Mr. Vern Swing, from Spack Consulting, was present to discuss the preliminary information from a traffic study that his company was conducting on Dodd Road. He has collected some data at the intersections in this area. He stated that Maple Street is used mostly as a cut-through for residents to get to The Village. It is used by approximately 200 cars per day. He stated that the intersection of Dodd and Market Street may warrant a traffic signal. He stated that a traffic signal is more manageable than a roundabout. He has a call in to MnDOT to discuss the possibility of a signal at this intersection. Mr. Swing stated that it would take approximately three weeks to finalize the traffic study, and if the City wants to have a peer review of the study completed, that may take approximately one additional week to do. John Carlson stated that they realize the project needs to make sense, and Trammell Crow is willing to get the answers needed for the Council. They hope to have the answers needed before convening a community meeting. ADJOURN Mayor Garlock adjourned the meeting at 3:20 p.m. ____________________________________ Neil Garlock, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 15 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Joint City Council / Parks and Recreation Commission Workshop Tuesday, May 9, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a joint workshop of the Mendota Heights City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission was held at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Garlock called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Councilmembers Duggan, Miller, and Petschel were also present. Councilmember Paper joined the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Parks and Recreation Commission members present included Chair Hinderscheid, Kipp, Levine, Toth, Miller, Klepperich, and Goldade. Staff in attendance included City Administrator Mark McNeill, Finance Director Kristen Schabacker, Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek, Recreation Program Coordinator Sloan Wallgren, and City Clerk Lorri Smith. PARKS FUNDING STATUS Administrator McNeill provided background information on short term funding for parks and reviewed the funding sources for the Special Parks Fund. It was noted that the City increased the amount of the park dedication fee in 2015 from $2,700 to $4,000 per unit of housing. The current balance in the Special Parks Fund is $650,000. New development in the City is the source of funding for the Special Parks Fund. The long term funding for the Special Parks Fund is a challenge. Two current bond levies related to parks will expire in the foreseeable future. The City Council could choose to continue to levy at those amounts for a source of funding for the parks. CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Capital improvement projects were reviewed. This year, the plan includes upgrading or replacing the tennis courts at Marie Park, ballfield fence at Victoria Highlands, and a warming house at Friendly Hills Park. Next year, the plan includes lights at Friendly Hills and Wentworth Hockey Rink, and tennis courts at Wentworth Park. The members discussed the options for replacing or upgrading the tennis courts at Marie Park, the need to add the skate park to the CIP, the possible installation of lights at Mendakota Park, and a possible splash pad. Councilmember Petschel noted the possibility of creating a Community Foundation for raising money for completing special projects in the City. page 16 Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek updated the members on the status of the trails in the city. It was noted that a trail along Lexington Avenue may not be completed by the County for some time, and users are encouraged to make their way through the neighborhoods for a safer route. Councilmember Petschel suggested more signage along the designated trail routes to make it easier for users to find their way. A possible tunnel under Dodd Road, just north of Highway 110, is being considered by the County. Director Ruzek stated that the Council will see the Dodd Road Trail Feasibility Study in the near future. It was noted that funding for trails does not come out of the Special Parks Fund. Questions were asked about how inspections are done on the City’s playground equipment. It was noted that Parks personnel are frequently checking on the equipment, and Parks-Recreation Commissioners are also inspecting the playground equipment and parks for safety hazards or improvements that are needed. OFF LEASH DOG PARK It was noted that the temporary off leash dog park is located on Acacia Boulevard, near Pilot Knob. In 2015, this property was designated a temporary dog park for a period of five years, or until another site is found. Councilmember Petschel stated that there may be an opportunity in the future to partner with the City of St. Paul for a dog park to be located off Highway 13. Improvements to the current dog park were discussed, including a wider gate to allow for a larger mower to gain entrance. A larger gate is estimated to cost $1,000. The condition of the turf was also discussed, and how to make it smoother for the users. Commissioner Miller suggested getting usage data from the dog park to find out how many residents are making use of it, which will help the City know how to plan for it in the future. Kimberly Franzen, a neighbor to the dog park, was present to inform the members that the users of the dog park are always very friendly and they obey the rules of the park. She sees it as a social area for our residents. She stated there is no bad smell coming from the park. Recreation Coordinator Sloan Wallgren stated that he has received complaints about a bad smell from another neighbor of the dog park. The members of the Council and Park and Rec Commission were in agreement to look into the cost of a new larger gate for the dog park. HISTORIC PILOT KNOB Wiley Buck, Ecologist from Great River Greening, presented an update on the restoration of Pilot Knob. He reviewed the three phases that have been completed in the restoration of Pilot Knob from 2005 through 2013, which will restore the land to oak savanna. The 2017-2022 proposed work plan and potential costs associated with the plan were also discussed. He stated that since Pilot Knob has now been named to the National Register of Historic Places, there may be more opportunities to obtain grants for the maintenance of the area. page 17 Gail Lewellan, co-chair of the Pilot Knob Preservation Association, spoke about the designation to the National Register of Historic Places. The brochures explaining the site are being updated and the Association may request funds from the City for the printing. ORGANIZED SPORTS NEEDS Recreation Program Coordinator Sloan Wallgren updated the members on spaces in Mendota Heights that could be used for additional soccer fields. He stated that be dispersing the fields around the City into the parks may help with the congestion that is currently seen at Friendly Hills Park during the soccer season. It was noted that the registrations for soccer have been increasing. JOINT FACILITIES UPDATE Coordinator Wallgren noted how gym space is hard to lease in Mendota Heights. Partnering with the schools for use of space was discussed. Commissioner Goldade stated that he is a member of the School District’s Facility Task Force, which will next be meeting on Monday, June 12. At that meeting, they will be discussing athletic facilities. The public is invited to attend. Mayor Garlock stated that partnering with other agencies is the way of the future. RECREATION PROGRAMMING Coordinator Wallgren asked the group if there was a desire to add more programs in recreation? He stated the City was exploring the idea of adding an archery range, but that there are currently no grants available. He explained that Thompson Park Activity Center in West St. Paul already offers a variety of senior programs. The City of Mendota Heights has offered limited senior programs at the Par 3 and Mendota Elementary during the winter months. The members discussed the Mendota Heights Athletic Association and their relationship with the City. It was noted that a representative from the City should attend their meetings to keep the communication open with that group. Councilmember Duggan left the meeting at 9:00 p.m. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Leslie Pilgrim was present to discuss with the members the creation of a Natural Resources Commission for the City. The Commission would be charged with monitoring and maintaining the natural resources that are in the City. She stated that the first step for the Commission would be to update the Natural Resources Management Plan. Councilmember Paper suggested that a portion of the parkland dedication fees be dedicated toward natural resources. Councilmember Petschel reminded the members of steps taken by the City Council to help our environment; i.e. street sweeping two times per year, and when barrier curbs had been installed. She page 18 said that these are decisions the prior City Councils have made to protect the local natural resources. She agreed that the City should have an updated Natural Resources Management Plan. Councilmember Jay Miller stated he felt there is a need for a Natural Resources Commission. Commissioner Goldade suggested a standing item for Natural Resources on every Park and Recreation Commission agenda. City Administrator McNeill suggested that the City get an estimated cost to update the Natural Resources Management Plan for the City. ADJOURN Mayor Garlock adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. ____________________________________ Neil Garlock, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 19 Request for City Council Action MEETING DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Tim Benetti, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Approve Sub-Contract Agreement for Back-Up Building Inspections Services COMMENT: Introduction The City Council is asked to acknowledge and approve a separate sub-contract agreement (attached hereto) between the City’s current contract consultant A to Z Home Inspections and MNSPECT, LLC, in order to provide back-up building inspections services for the city, as needed. Background The City of Mendota Heights is required to have a designated Building Official, and for the past 3+ years the City has contracted with Michael Andrejka with A to Z Home Inspections for Building Official Services. On January 5, 2016, the Council approved an Independent Contractor Agreement between Mr. Andrejka and the City. Under the terms of the contract, it states: “A to Z shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the services to be provided under this Contract without prior knowledge of the City.” Discussion Mr. Andrejka is a self-employed building inspections services operator, and does not employ any other inspectors or persons, other than his wife (as bookkeeper). Mr. Andrejka suggested any time he wished to take a vacation, or in cases of an emergency, long-term illness or disability, the city would be covered under this sub-contract agreement to continue building inspection services for the city. MNSPECT is another contractual building inspection service. In any instance where MNSPECT is called in to provide temporary services, MNSPECT will track and record all work hours performed, and A to Z will invoice the city at his own regular (approved) hourly contracted rate. A to Z would then directly reimburse MNSPECT for any and all work performed. Budget Impact A to Z Home Inspections will continue to be paid hourly under the approved (original) contract. There will be no changes to the original contract agreement or rates, or impacts to the city approved budget. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council pass a motion to approve the attached sub- contract agreement between A to Z Home Inspections and MNSPECT, LLC. This action requires a simple majority vote. page 20 page 21 page 22 page 23 DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Lorri Smith, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License COMMENT: Introduction The City Council is asked to approve a temporary on-sale liquor license for Beth Jacob Congregation for an event to be held June 11, 2017. Background Pursuant to City Code, no person shall sell or give away liquor without first having received a license. Temporary on-sale liquor licenses shall be granted only to clubs or charitable, religious or nonprofit organizations. The licenses are subject to final approval by the Director of Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. Beth Jacob Congregation, located at 1179 Victoria Curve, is planning to hold a fund raising event on Sunday, June 11, 2017 at the Congregation during the hours of 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. They have requested a temporary on-sale liquor license to allow for the sale of alcohol. Security will be present during the event. A completed application has been received, along with the license fee and a certificate of insurance for liquor liability. It should be noted that temporary on-sale liquor licenses have been issued in the past to charitable, nonprofit and religious organizations within the city with no incidents or negative reports. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve a temporary on-sale liquor license for Beth Jacob Congregation for June 11, 2017, subject to final approval of the Director of Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement. page 24 DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting Local Decision Making Authority COMMENT: Introduction The City Council is asked to consider passing a resolution in response to state legislative proposals that restrict or remove the decision making authority of local elected officials or that are preemptive in nature. Background In this session of the Minnesota Legislature a number of bills have been introduced which would interfere with local decision making authority in several policy areas. The bills, if passed, could significantly hinder local City Councils’ ability to effectively serve their communities as they are expressly elected to do so. Bills being considered would directly or indirectly impact local decision-making ability across a broad range of policy and funding areas by: • Constraining local law enforcement authority • Restricting a city’s ability to set local ordinances • Allowing certain businesses unfettered access to public rights of way while eliminating a city’s ability to manage them • Restricting a city’s ability to use allowed fee structures Other bills would penalize cities for passing certain local ordinances by reducing or eliminating Local Government Aid (LGA). While Mendota Heights does not receive LGA, a troubling precedent would be set if those bills pass. The proposed resolution, drafted by the League of Minnesota Cities, supports local decision making authority, and opposes legislation that removes the ability for local elected officials to respond to the needs of their constituents. If adopted, the City would join approximately 60 other cities who have expressed similar support by calling on the Legislature to stop advancing bills that place limits on local decision making authority. The approved resolution would be forwarded to the League of Minnesota Cities. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of the resolution supporting local decision making authority. page 25 Action Required If the council concurs, it should by motion, adopt the following resolution: Resolution #2017-38 A Resolution Supporting Local Decision Making Authority. Mark McNeill City Administrator page 26 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #2017-38 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LOCAL DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, local elected decision-makers are in the best position to determine what health, safety and welfare regulations best serve their constituents; and WHEREAS, just like state legislative leaders, locally elected officials are held accountable through Minnesota’s robust elections process; and WHEREAS, ordinances at the local level are enacted only after a comprehensive, legal and open process; and WHEREAS, local units of government are required to publish notices about meetings where policies will be discussed and decisions will be made; and WHEREAS, under the state’s Open Meeting Law, public policy discussions and decisions must occur in meetings that are accessible to members of the public; and WHEREAS, cities are often laboratories for determining public policy approaches to the challenges that face residents and businesses; and WHEREAS, preservation of local control in Minnesota has yielded statewide benefits such as the 2007 Freedom to Breathe Act, an amendment to the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act; and WHEREAS, more than two dozen bills that restrict local decision-making have been introduced in 2017 to date. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that this Council supports local decision-making authority, and opposes legislation that removes the ability for local elected officials to respond to the needs of their businesses and constituents. Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 16th day of May, 2017. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________ Neil Garlock, Mayor ATTEST ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 27 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Administrative Interim Use Permit – 750 South Plaza Drive COMMENT: INTRODUCTION The Council is asked approve an administrative interim use at 750 South Plaza Drive. BACKGROUND The City Council adopted Ordinance 479 on July 7, 2015 which allows for permits to be granted for interim use in any district. Interim Use Permits (IUP) require a public hearing at a planning commission meeting and recommendation for approval by the City Council similar to standard planning applications. Conditions can be applied to the permit and the permit can be revoked if the conditions are not met. DISCUSSION The contractor for the MnDOT Highway 110 project and Dakota County Pedestrian Trail project, S.M. Hentges, has leased space in the Office Building at 750 South Plaza Drive. The contractor is also proposing to bring in a semi-trailer which will act as the field and lab office for the State and County construction project. The semi-trailer in the parking lot is not a standard allowed use in a business district and would require an IUP. Due to the limited amount of time between the contractor being awarded the project and immediately starting construction activities, there would not be time for them to be granted proper zoning approval. The property is located between the Dakota County CDA building, White Pines Senior Housing and residential properties along Creek Ave & Aztec Lane. In discussions with the contractor, the trailer is only to be used for meetings and some minor gradation sampling during normal business hours with minimal noise and activity. Per the required meeting and submittal dates for a planning application, the earliest an IUP could be approved would be at the June planning commission meeting and the July 3rd City Council meeting. The project will have been under construction for a month by that date. The City Attorney’s office feels that an expedited approval is warranted, given the fact that this is a state contract. Again, there was not the normal preparation time, as S. M. Hentges was page 28 relatively recently awearded the contract, and therefore would not have had the normal time in which to seek an IUP. BUDGET IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of an Administrative IUP with following conditions: • The Administrative IOP will expire on November 16, 2017 (six months) • Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday • Any use producing noise shall be in conformance with the minimum standards as adopted and enforced by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and shall be conducted in such a way as to avoid constituting a nuisance. (Ord. 429, 8-3-2010) ACTION REQUIRED If Council desires to implement the Staff recommendation, pass a motion approving the Administrative Interim Use Permit for S.M. Hentges at 750 South Plaza Drive. This action requires a simple majority vote. page 29 311 759 422 8985 240200182175232 738260 97131 129 111117121 11411210810264 25667595851 5046 4339 3 7 24922 2 212018 9178 83 1 0 450111 10885 4 750 750750 759765 2106771 2112 SOUTH PLAZA DR CREEK AVE AZTEC LNDakota County GIS Administrative IUP750 South Plaza Drive City ofMendotaHeights0100 SCALE IN FEET GIS Map Disclaimer:This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat,survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information containedin this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errorsor omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. 5/12/2017 Semi Trailer Location page 30 5/10/2017 Mendota Heights Building Activity Report Mike Andrejka, Building Official April 1, 2017 thru April 30, 2017 January 1, 2017 thru April 30, 2017 January 1, 2016 thru April 30, 2016 January 1, 2015 thru April 30, 2015 Building Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Building Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Building Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Building Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected SFD 2 1,415,000.00$ $14,831.03 SFD 4 1,920,000.00$ $21,337.81 SFD 2 972,850.00$ $11,049.53 SFD 5 2,513,000.00$ 27,008.45$ APT 0 -$ $0.00 APT 0 -$ $0.00 APT 0 -$ $0.00 APT 0 -$ -$ Townhouse 0 -$ $0.00 Townhouse 2 450,000.00$ $4,516.88 Townhouse 6 1,465,000.00$ $16,170.54 Townhouse 0 -$ -$ Condo 0 -$ $0.00 Condo 0 -$ $0.00 Condo 0 -$ $0.00 Condo 0 -$ -$ Misc 69 703,890.76$ 11,889.25$ Misc 164 1,915,179.16$ 29,569.81$ Misc 146 2,249,001.56$ 31,179.84$ Misc 145 2,719,453.84$ 40,142.55$ Commercial 1 14,985.00$ $315.50 Commercial 11 5,195,880.00$ $43,694.93 Commercial 10 1,313,255.00$ $13,920.09 Commercial 14 1,243,563.00$ 17,605.84$ Sub Total 72 2,133,875.76$ 27,035.78$ Sub Total 181 9,481,059.16$ 99,119.43$ Sub Total 164 6,000,106.56$ 72,320.00$ Sub Total 164 6,476,016.84$ 84,756.84$ Trade Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Trade Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Trade Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Trade Permit No.Valuation Fee Collected Plumbing 15 $1,125.00 Plumbing 51 $4,253.13 Plumbing 79 $7,202.25 Plumbing 79 6,657.21$ Water 0 $0.00 Water 0 $0.00 Water 1 $10.00 Water 2 20.00$ Sewer 1 $75.00 Sewer 13 $988.00 Sewer 9 $675.00 Sewer 3 225.00$ Mechanical 33 $3,723.33 Mechanical 110 $12,639.81 Mechanical 113 $9,875.09 Mechanical 104 8,961.04$ Sub Total 49 4,923.33$ Sub Total 174 17,880.94$ Sub Total 202 $17,762.34 Sub Total 188 15,863.25$ License No.Valuation Fee Collected Licenses No.Valuation Fee Collected Licenses No.Valuation Fee Collected Licenses No.Valuation Fee Collected Contractor 10 $500.00 Contractor 220 $11,000.00 Contractor 207 $10,350.00 Contractor 219 10,950.00$ Total 131 2,133,875.76$ 32,459.11$ Total 575 9,481,059.16$ 128,000.37$ Total 573 6,000,106.56$ 100,432.34$ Total 571 6,476,016.84$ 111,570.09$ NOTE: All fee amounts exclude SAC, WAC and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan review fee and valuation totals page 31 Request for City Council Action MEETING DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Scott Goldenstein, Assistant Fire Chief SUBJECT: April 2017 Fire Synopsis Fire Calls The department responded to 34 calls for the month. As of the end of April, we have had 94 calls for service as opposed to 64 calls by the end of April last year. Location wise, we had 24 calls that were located in Mendota Heights, one in Mendota, three in Sunfish Lake and four in Lilydale, (as well as two calls outside of our coverage areas). Of the calls received, we responded to three structure fires (including two fires that were virtually back to back), an oven fire, two homes with smoke in the residence, and three grass fire related calls (one in Mendota Heights and two in Inver Grove Heights). We also responded to an underground explosion from a powerline that had shorted causing a manhole cover to be lifted into the air. In addition, the department was called to three calls that were medical in nature and an auto accident with injuries requiring extrication. Eight of the thirty-four calls were either good intent or false alarms and four calls were coded as utility checks. We also responded to a request from Inver Grove Heights for mutual aid assistance. Live Burn Training On Saturday, April 8th, the MHFD had the opportunity to do live burn training at a former home at 1189 Bourne Lane. The department had used the home for numerous training opportunities with the burn being the final event. Live burn training requires an immense amount of preparation and effort from the training department. Firefighters receive a learning experience that is nearly impossible to duplicate in any other environment. The weather was excellent and the burn was done safely and effectively. Monthly Department Training Our monthly department drill covered primarily fire and smoke flow paths. It was done by using a custom built miniature home prop. Our training department was able to start a fire in the miniature home prop. This demonstrated the importance of our controlling the oxygen that the fire has available to it and it also provided safer conditions for our firefighters to work in and hopefully minimize the fires size and growth. The drill also drove home the importance of closing bedroom doors at night for everyone’s safety. At this month’s drill we also had an opportunity to practice the deployment and use of our new Floto Pump. The Floto Pump gives us the capability to pump water from water sources (such as a pond or swimming pool) when we cannot get our regular equipment where we need it. Monthly Squad Training For April, our Squad Drills all focused on the ground ladders that we carry. Each of our first out engines carry four different types of ladders and this drill allows our firefighter to practice their skills including ladder carries, extending the ladders and the correct ladder placement depending on what we need it for. Nearly all working fires that we go to require ladder usage of one type or another and keeping firefighters sharp on their deployment is of paramount importance. page 32 MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT APRIL 2017 MONTHLY REPORT FIRE CALLS NO. 17061 -17094 NUMBER OF CALLS:34 FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED:NUMBER STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC.TOTALS TO DATE ACTUAL FIRES Structure - MH Commercial $0 Structure - MH Residential 3 $40,500 $35,000 $75,500 Structure - Contract Areas $0 Vehicle - MH $2,000 Vehicle - Contract Areas $0 Grass/Brush/No Value MH 1 Grass/Brush/No Value Contract TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES MEDICAL Assist 3 $40,500 $35,000 Extrication 1 HAZARDOUS SITUATION FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS Spills/Leaks 1 Arcing/Shorting ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH)$75,500 $77,500 Chemical Power Line Down MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS $75,500 FALSE ALARM Residential Malfunction MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS $2,000 Commercial Malfunction 1 Unintentional - Commercial 2 MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE $77,500 Unintentional - Residential 3 Criminal BILLING FOR SERVICES GOOD INTENT Smoke Scare 2 AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE Steam Mistaken for Smoke Other 15 MN/DOT $0 MUTUAL AID 2 MILW. RR $0 CNR RR $0 TOTAL CALLS 34 OTHERS: $0 LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS:TO DATE LAST YEAR TOTALS:$0 $0 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 24 71 47 MENDOTA 1 3 3 FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH SUNFISH LAKE 3 6 3 LILYDALE 4 10 6 INSPECTIONS OTHER 2 4 5 INVESTIGATIONS TOTAL 34 94 64 RE-INSPECTION WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE LAST YEAR MEETINGS FIRE CALLS 500 1287 1021 MEETINGS 28 159.5 139 ADMINISTRATION DRILLS 135.5 638 682 WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 30 131.5 159.5 SPECIAL PROJECTS SPECIAL ACTIVITY 308 834 834.75 ADMINISTATIVE 0 0 TOTAL 0 FIRE MARSHAL 109.5 194.5 TOTALS 1001.5 3159.5 3030.75 REMARKS:SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS page 33 page 34 page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 page 39 page 40 page 41 page 42 page 43 page 44 page 45 page 46 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Resolution 2017-36 Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project COMMENT: INTRODUCTION The Council is asked to approve Resolution 2017-36 accepting bids and awarding a contract for the 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. BACKGROUND Our sanitary sewer system is aging. Many of our pipes are 60 years old and will soon be in need of repair. Cleaning our sewer system on a regular cycle will help extend the life of the pipes. Televising of the system will show where immediate repairs are needed. Lining pipes in need of repair with cured-in-place-pipe will extend the life of our system. DISCUSSION The 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project consists of lining approximately 1700 feet of sanitary sewer pipe and 70 feet of storm sewer pipe. The recent collapse of the city’s sanitary sewer interceptor has increased the priority of protecting the backbone of the system. The interceptor starts near Highway 55 and Mendota Heights Road and collects sewer from adjacent properties as it heads north to the MCES pump house on Lilydale Road. In 2015, the city installed a Cast In Place Pipe (CIPP) liner from the start of the interceptor to approximately 2000 feet east behind RJ Ryan. It is staff’s goal to line the entire length of the interceptor as the interceptor is made from concrete pipe that has deteriorated due to the bacteria in sewage. Staff is proposing to line the largest diameter and deepest section of the interceptor with the 2017 project. This portion runs through the parking lot of Mendota Plaza. A collapse to this section of the system would be catastrophic, as the pipe is under a developed parking lot and is up to 40 feet deep. Six bids (see attached resolution) were received and opened on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 for the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. Insituform Technologies submitted the low bid of $430,728.40. Their bid was higher than the Engineer’s Estimate of $274,810.00. The higher costs are due to the large diameter pipes for the interceptor line, a high capacity bypass system, page 47 and the need to excavate and remove the top portion of the manhole to get the necessary room to install the liner. The City has not lined many large diameter pipes with the high flows on past projects resulting in limited data for estimating unit costs for this project. Staff has negotiated with the contractor to reduce the project quantities to better align the project with available funds in the utility account. Approximately 600 feet of pipe will need to be removed from the project which would result in a reduction of the contract amount to $339,300.80. The completion date for the project is October 31, 2017. Insituform Technologies is capable of meeting the completion dates and implementing the project in accordance with the plans and specifications given. BUDGET IMPACT The project costs will be funded through the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund. The 2017 City budget includes $110,000 for sanitary sewer maintenance and a carryover from 2016 of approximately $172,000. The 70 feet of storm sewer pipe is proposed to be funded through the Storm Water Utility fund totaling approximately $55,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council accept the bids, and award the contract to Insituform Technologies for their bid in the amount of $430,728.40. Staff also recommends reducing the project quantities. ACTION REQUIRED If City Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, it should pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2017 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201705). This action requires a simple majority vote. page 48 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017-36 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2017 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT #201705) WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for bids for the proposed lining of sanitary sewers to serve the area referred to as 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 201705), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Insituform Technologies $430,728.40 Lametti & Sons, Inc. $447,840.00 Michels Corporation $503,944.00 Veit & Company, Inc. $577,210.00 SAK Construction, LLC $589,804.00 Visu-Sewer, Inc. $637,354.00 and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommended that the low bid submitted by Insituform Technologies of Chesterfield, MO, be accepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. That the bids for the above project are hereby received and accepted. 2. That the bid of Insituform Technologies of Chesterfield, MO, submitted for the 2017 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation of the above described project be and the same is hereby accepted. 3. That the contract be awarded to Insituform Technologies of Chesterfield, MO, and that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of May 2017. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Neil Garlock, Mayor ATTEST _________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page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page 50 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTSInsituform Technologies USA Lametti & Sons, IncMichels CorporationVeit & Company, IncSAK Construction, LLCVisu-Sewer, IncPROJECT:2017 Sanitary Sewer RehabilitationPROJECT #:201705DATE: 4/13/2017I certify that I have personally opened and read all bids, verified this abstract and find it correct.By:__________________________________________________________________ITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNITENGINEER'S ESTIMATED QUANTITYENGINEER'S ESTIMATED UNIT PRICEENGINEER'S ESTIMATED AMOUNTBID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNTBID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNTBID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNT BID UNIT PRICE BID AMOUNTSCHEDULE 'A' - LINING124" CIPPL.F. 244 $110.00 $26,840.00 $201.10 $49,068.40 $135.00 $32,940.00 $180.00 $43,920.00 $255.00 $62,220.00 $265.00 $64,660.00 $450.00 $109,800.00227" CIPPL.F. 190$122.50$23,275.00 $252.70 $48,013.00 $205.00 $38,950.00 $200.00 $38,000.00 $315.00 $59,850.00 $315.00 $59,850.00 $284.00 $53,960.00330" CIPPL.F. 1,346$135.00 $181,710.00 $207.60 $279,429.60 $225.00 $302,850.00 $205.00 $275,930.00 $290.00 $390,340.00 $289.00 $388,994.00 $284.00 $382,264.00442" CIPPL.F. 70$550.00$38,500.00 $678.30 $47,481.00 $750.00 $52,500.00 $449.00 $31,430.00 $430.00 $30,100.00 $540.00 $37,800.00 $546.00 $38,220.005Lateral Reinstatements (any size)Each 1$185.00$185.00$127.60 $127.60 $300.00 $300.00 $500.00 $500.00 $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 $250.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.006Protruding Tap Trimming (Any Size)Each 1$300.00$300.00$518.00 $518.00 $300.00 $300.00 $550.00 $550.00 $600.00 $600.00 $250.00 $250.00$10.00$10.007Grout 42" Storm Sewer CMP prior to CIPP InstallationL.S. 1$1,000.00$1,000.00 $4,454.50 $4,454.50 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.008MobilizationL.S. 1$3,000.00$3,000.00 $1,636.30 $1,636.30 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $110,114.00 $110,114.00 $26,500.00 $26,500.00 $37,500.00 $37,500.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 TOTAL$274,810.00 $430,728.40 $447,840.00 $503,944.00$577,210.00$589,804.00$637,354.00BID ABSTRACTPage 1 of 1page 51 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: May 16, 2017 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Resolution 2017-37 Accept Bids and Award Contract for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements COMMENT: INTRODUCTION The Council is asked to approve Resolution 2017-37 accepting bids and awarding a contract for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvement Project. BACKGROUND Council ordered the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements at their February 7, 2017 meeting, and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for this street reconstruction project. The plans were approved and authorized to bid at the March 28, 2017 meeting. DISCUSSION Five bids (see below) were received and opened on Wednesday, May 10, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Improvements. NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Valley Paving, Inc. $1,650,939.72 McNamara Contracting, Inc. $1,663,470.01 Hardrives, Inc. $1,670,022.91 Max Steininger, Inc. $1,699,364.16 Arnt Construction $1,925,657.90 Valley Paving, Inc. submitted the lowest responsible bid of $1,650,939.72. Their bid was less than the Engineer's Estimate of $2,136,000. Valley Paving, Inc. is a contractor with many years of experience with an office in Shakopee, Minnesota and has completed projects in Mendota Heights in the past. Staff recommends them for this contract. The base paving on Mendota Heights Road must be completed by September 1, 2017 and all other base course paving must be completed by October 1, 2017. Final completion will be in June of 2018 for final wear course paving. We expect Valley Paving, Inc., serving in the capacity page 52 of General Contractor, is capable of meeting the completion dates and installing the proposed improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications given their experience and the amount of equipment and manpower they have at their disposal. Staff will mail out a general notice to the residents about the project if council awards the contract, including information regarding the construction schedule. BUDGET IMPACT The Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements are proposed to be financed by Special Assessments, Municipal Bonds, Municipal State Aid, and Utility Funds. The total cost for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements is $1,650,939.72, not including indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the council accept the bids and award the construction contract to Valley Paving, Inc. for their bid in the amount of $1,650,939.72. ACTION REQUIRED If city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD AND KENSIGNTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS. This action requires a super majority vote. page 53 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017-37 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD AND KENSIGNTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, trail improvements, street paving and related appurtenant work of rehabilitating Mendota Heights Road from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road, including Condon Court and rehabilitating Concord Way, Lockwood Drive, Bedford Court, Stockbridge Road, and Whitfield Drive and reconstruction of Claremont Drive referred to as the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with said advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER AMOUNT OF BID Valley Paving, Inc. $1,650,939.72 McNamara Contracting, Inc. $1,663,470.01 Hardrives, Inc. $1,670,022.91 Max Steininger, Inc. $1,699,364.16 Arnt Construction $1,925,657.90 and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommended that the lowest responsible bid submitted by Valley Paving, Inc. of Shakopee, Minnesota, be accepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. That the bids for the Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements project are hereby received and accepted. 2. That the bid of Valley Paving, Inc. of Shakopee, Minnesota, submitted for the construction of the above described improvements be and the same is hereby accepted. 3. That the contract be awarded to Valley Paving, Inc. of Shakopee, Minnesota, and that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consummate the awarding of said bids. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of May, 2017. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST ___________________________ _____________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk Neil Garlock, Mayor page 54 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2335 Highway 36 West, St. Paul MN 55113 May 10, 2017 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re:Mendota Heights Road and Kensington Street Improvements City Project Nos. MH2014009 and MH201616 SAP Project No. 140-103-020 Stantec Project No. 193803763 Bid Results Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Bids were opened for the Project stated above on May 10, 2017.There was a total of 5 Bids received. The following summarizes the results of the Bids received: Contractor Total Base Bid Low Valley Paving, Inc.$1,650,939.72 #2 McNamara Contracting Inc.$1,663,470.01 #3 Hardrives Inc.$1,670,022.91 #4 Max Steininger, Inc.$1,699,364.16 #5 Arnt Construction Co., Inc.$1,925,658.58 Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your information and file. Copies will also be distributed to each Bidder once the Project has been awarded. The low Bidder on the Project was Valley Paving, Inc. with a Total Base Bid Amount of $1,650,939.72. This compares to the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Costs of $2,136,000. These Bids have been reviewed and found to be in order. If the City Council wishes to award the Project to the low Bidder, then Valley Paving, Inc.should be awarded the Project on the Total Base Bid Amount of $1,650,939.72. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (651) 604-4913. Sincerely, Chad G. Davison, PE Enclosure page 55 Project Name: City Project No.:Project No.: Bid Opening:Owner: License No. 44177 BID TABULATION Item Num Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $47,128.80 $47,128.80 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $7,707.65 $7,707.65 3 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LIN FT 172 $5.00 $860.00 $2.05 $352.60 $2.00 $344.00 $2.03 $349.16 4 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT 412 $10.00 $4,120.00 $12.25 $5,047.00 $13.00 $5,356.00 $12.08 $4,976.96 5 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 6198 $8.00 $49,584.00 $6.50 $40,287.00 $6.00 $37,188.00 $4.33 $26,837.34 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 797 $2.00 $1,594.00 $1.25 $996.25 $2.00 $1,594.00 $2.69 $2,143.93 7 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT 70 $8.00 $560.00 $4.00 $280.00 $6.00 $420.00 $3.84 $268.80 8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT 1200 $8.00 $9,600.00 $1.50 $1,800.00 $2.00 $2,400.00 $3.84 $4,608.00 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT 9150 $3.00 $27,450.00 $0.80 $7,320.00 $0.75 $6,862.50 $0.93 $8,509.50 10 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 7770 $3.00 $23,310.00 $1.90 $14,763.00 $3.50 $27,195.00 $3.21 $24,941.70 11 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH 9 $500.00 $4,500.00 $470.00 $4,230.00 $475.00 $4,275.00 $462.46 $4,162.14 12 REMOVE CASTING EACH 4 $100.00 $400.00 $75.00 $300.00 $70.00 $280.00 $141.43 $565.72 13 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 152 $5.00 $760.00 $4.50 $684.00 $3.00 $456.00 $4.62 $702.24 14 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 620 $5.00 $3,100.00 $3.00 $1,860.00 $2.00 $1,240.00 $1.90 $1,178.00 15 SALVAGE RC CATTLE PASS LIN FT 80 $20.00 $1,600.00 $48.25 $3,860.00 $50.00 $4,000.00 $47.64 $3,811.20 16 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 74 $100.00 $7,400.00 $187.00 $13,838.00 $100.00 $7,400.00 $70.72 $5,233.28 17 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD 10130 $10.00 $101,300.00 $16.20 $164,106.00 $21.00 $212,730.00 $14.76 $149,518.80 18 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)CU YD 500 $20.00 $10,000.00 $21.00 $10,500.00 $25.00 $12,500.00 $14.43 $7,215.00 19 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 3130 $20.00 $62,600.00 $17.50 $54,775.00 $22.00 $68,860.00 $18.06 $56,527.80 20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SQ YD 7770 $1.00 $7,770.00 $0.60 $4,662.00 $0.50 $3,885.00 $1.26 $9,790.20 21 BASE PREPARATION SQ YD 30830 $1.00 $30,830.00 $0.55 $16,956.50 $0.50 $15,415.00 $1.23 $37,920.90 22 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 16 $100.00 $1,600.00 $105.00 $1,680.00 $125.00 $2,000.00 $156.91 $2,510.56 23 WATER MGAL 27 $100.00 $2,700.00 $40.00 $1,080.00 $100.00 $2,700.00 $5.34 $144.18 24 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 250 $28.00 $7,000.00 $18.00 $4,500.00 $21.00 $5,250.00 $14.19 $3,547.50 25 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (SALVAGED RECLAIM MATERIAL) (CV) CU YD 2143 $25.00 $53,575.00 $8.50 $18,215.50 $7.50 $16,072.50 $9.93 $21,279.99 26 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 30830 $4.00 $123,320.00 $0.85 $26,205.50 $1.00 $30,830.00 $1.19 $36,687.70 27 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5")SQ YD 2200 $2.00 $4,400.00 $1.80 $3,960.00 $2.00 $4,400.00 $2.93 $6,446.00 28 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD 1390 $2.00 $2,780.00 $1.90 $2,641.00 $3.00 $4,170.00 $3.05 $4,239.50 29 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (4.0")SQ YD 9780 $3.00 $29,340.00 $1.60 $15,648.00 $2.00 $19,560.00 $1.50 $14,670.00 30 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2115 $4.00 $8,460.00 $2.20 $4,653.00 $1.00 $2,115.00 $1.46 $3,087.90 31 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON 572 $100.00 $57,200.00 $77.00 $44,044.00 $54.00 $30,888.00 $73.66 $42,133.52 32 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 2310 $75.00 $173,250.00 $54.20 $125,202.00 $48.00 $110,880.00 $54.89 $126,795.90 33 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON 190 $75.00 $14,250.00 $53.60 $10,184.00 $45.00 $8,550.00 $51.28 $9,743.20 34 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 2080 $75.00 $156,000.00 $52.10 $108,368.00 $48.00 $99,840.00 $56.17 $116,833.60 35 TYPE SP 9.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 3830 $70.00 $268,100.00 $53.20 $203,756.00 $46.00 $176,180.00 $53.81 $206,092.30 36 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 3120 $70.00 $218,400.00 $49.75 $155,220.00 $44.00 $137,280.00 $52.33 $163,269.60 37 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LIN FT 1051 $1.00 $1,051.00 $0.01 $10.51 $0.01 $10.51 $0.01 $10.51 38 INSTALL RC CATTLE PASS LIN FT 80 $50.00 $4,000.00 $142.75 $11,420.00 $77.00 $6,160.00 $74.94 $5,995.20 39 6" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 6 $20.00 $120.00 $23.50 $141.00 $24.00 $144.00 $23.15 $138.90 40 8" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 1051 $70.00 $73,570.00 $71.30 $74,936.30 $72.00 $75,672.00 $70.45 $74,042.95 41 12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 380 $40.00 $15,200.00 $48.20 $18,316.00 $49.00 $18,620.00 $47.58 $18,080.40 42 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 187 $55.00 $10,285.00 $49.00 $9,163.00 $50.00 $9,350.00 $48.54 $9,076.98 43 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN)EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $2,625.00 $2,625.00 $2,569.22 $2,569.22 44 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $675.00 $1,350.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $668.00 $1,336.00 45 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,820.00 $3,640.00 $1,900.00 $3,800.00 $1,798.45 $3,596.90 46 8" HDPE PIPE SEWER-DIRECTIONAL DRILLED LIN FT 415 $200.00 $83,000.00 $53.70 $22,285.50 $55.00 $22,825.00 $52.96 $21,978.40 47 HYDRANT EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,150.00 $4,150.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,101.67 $4,101.67 48 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 33 $450.00 $14,850.00 $350.00 $11,550.00 $400.00 $13,200.00 $188.58 $6,223.14 Bidder No. 2 McNamara Contracting Bidder No. 3 Hardrives, Inc.Engineer's Estimate Valley Paving, Inc. I hereby certify that this is an exact reproduction of bids received. Bidder No. 1 Mendota Heights Road & Kensington Street Improvements City of Mendota Heights, MN MH2014009 and MH201616 Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10 A.M., CDT 193803763 Chad G. Davison, P.E. 193803763-BidTab.xlsm BT-1 page 56 BID TABULATION Item Num Item Units Qty Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Bidder No. 2 McNamara Contracting Bidder No. 3 Hardrives, Inc.Engineer's Estimate Valley Paving, Inc. Bidder No. 1 49 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,300.00 $2,600.00 $1,751.00 $3,502.00 $1,289.06 $2,578.12 50 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 5 $800.00 $4,000.00 $1,630.00 $8,150.00 $1,550.00 $7,750.00 $1,614.98 $8,074.90 51 2" AIR VENT EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,660.00 $2,660.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $2,632.38 $2,632.38 52 1.5" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LIN FT 291 $25.00 $7,275.00 $18.60 $5,412.60 $19.00 $5,529.00 $18.36 $5,342.76 53 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 53 LIN FT 545 $35.00 $19,075.00 $46.90 $25,560.50 $48.00 $26,160.00 $46.28 $25,222.60 54 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 188 $6.00 $1,128.00 $6.80 $1,278.40 $7.00 $1,316.00 $6.71 $1,261.48 55 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G EACH 5 $2,500.00 $12,500.00 $2,320.00 $11,600.00 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 $1,639.16 $8,195.80 56 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 4007 EACH 5 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 $6,000.00 $30,000.00 $5,800.00 $29,000.00 $5,137.41 $25,687.05 57 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 EACH 4 $4,000.00 $16,000.00 $2,570.00 $10,280.00 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $1,883.75 $7,535.00 58 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 EACH 2 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,150.00 $10,300.00 $3,800.00 $7,600.00 $4,041.89 $8,083.78 59 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 96-4020 EACH 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,200.00 $11,200.00 $9,400.00 $9,400.00 $8,666.48 $8,666.48 60 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 4 $800.00 $3,200.00 $700.00 $2,800.00 $900.00 $3,600.00 $637.40 $2,549.60 61 INSTALL CASTING EACH 74 $450.00 $33,300.00 $400.00 $29,600.00 $600.00 $44,400.00 $579.62 $42,891.88 62 REPAIR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DOGHOUSE EACH 17 $450.00 $7,650.00 $195.00 $3,315.00 $195.00 $3,315.00 $190.12 $3,232.04 63 REPAIR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INVERT EACH 5 $450.00 $2,250.00 $240.00 $1,200.00 $250.00 $1,250.00 $236.37 $1,181.85 64 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 20 $100.00 $2,000.00 $104.00 $2,080.00 $105.00 $2,100.00 $102.51 $2,050.20 65 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 351 $9.00 $3,159.00 $9.00 $3,159.00 $9.00 $3,159.00 $9.97 $3,499.47 66 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 4970 $18.00 $89,460.00 $20.50 $101,885.00 $16.00 $79,520.00 $20.41 $101,437.70 67 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624 LIN FT 1228 $22.00 $27,016.00 $22.50 $27,630.00 $20.00 $24,560.00 $23.72 $29,128.16 68 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 133 $60.00 $7,980.00 $57.00 $7,581.00 $48.00 $6,384.00 $57.23 $7,611.59 69 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 80 $100.00 $8,000.00 $62.00 $4,960.00 $40.00 $3,200.00 $50.87 $4,069.60 70 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $4,069.64 $4,069.64 71 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 350 $4.00 $1,400.00 $2.00 $700.00 $4.00 $1,400.00 $1.93 $675.50 72 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 53 $300.00 $15,900.00 $100.00 $5,300.00 $126.00 $6,678.00 $91.57 $4,853.21 73 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,191.82 $1,191.82 74 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 210 $10.00 $2,100.00 $0.60 $126.00 $1.00 $210.00 $0.41 $86.10 75 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 340 $25.00 $8,500.00 $32.00 $10,880.00 $67.00 $22,780.00 $39.67 $13,487.80 76 SEEDING ACRE 0.2 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $310.00 $62.00 $9,200.00 $1,840.00 $4,069.65 $813.93 77 SEED MIXTURE 36-711 POUND 40 $50.00 $2,000.00 $19.20 $768.00 $8.00 $320.00 $18.82 $752.80 78 SODDING TYPE LAWN SQ YD 2580 $6.00 $15,480.00 $4.50 $11,610.00 $7.00 $18,060.00 $9.36 $24,148.80 79 WATER MGAL 14 $100.00 $1,400.00 $2.00 $28.00 $100.00 $1,400.00 $50.87 $712.18 80 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPOXY SQ FT 300 $3.00 $900.00 $5.15 $1,545.00 $6.00 $1,800.00 $5.16 $1,548.00 81 4" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 5978 $0.40 $2,391.20 $0.30 $1,793.40 $0.30 $1,793.40 $0.28 $1,673.84 82 12" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 555 $5.00 $2,775.00 $4.10 $2,275.50 $4.50 $2,497.50 $4.13 $2,292.15 83 24" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 80 $5.00 $400.00 $7.00 $560.00 $8.00 $640.00 $7.02 $561.60 84 4" BROKEN LINE EPOXY LIN FT 1100 $0.25 $275.00 $0.30 $330.00 $0.30 $330.00 $0.28 $308.00 85 24" DOTTED LINE EPOXY LIN FT 63 $10.00 $630.00 $7.00 $441.00 $8.00 $504.00 $7.02 $442.26 86 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 556 $1.00 $556.00 $0.56 $311.36 $0.60 $333.60 $0.56 $311.36 87 CROSSWALK EPOXY SQ FT 504 $6.00 $3,024.00 $3.70 $1,864.80 $4.00 $2,016.00 $3.72 $1,874.88 88 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPOXY (YIELD)EACH 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 $185.50 $556.50 $200.00 $600.00 $185.92 $557.76 TOTAL BASE BID $2,135,513.20 $1,650,939.72 $1,663,470.01 $1,670,022.91 Contractor Name and Address: Phone:952-445-8615 651-322-5500 763-428-8886 Email:brent@valleypaving.com m.mcnamara@mcnamaracontracting.com danhall@hardrivesinc.com Signed By:Brent Carron Tim Crennen Title:Vice President President Vice President Bid Security:Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Mike McNamara Valley Paving, Inc. 8800 13th Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55380 McNamara Contracting Inc. 16700 Chippendale Avenue Rosemount, MN 55068 Hardrives Inc. 14475 Quiram Drive Rogers, MN 55374 193803763-BidTab.xlsm BT-2 page 57 Project Name: City Project No.: Bid Opening: BID TABULATION Item Num Item Units Qty BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LUMP SUM 1 3 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LIN FT 172 4 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT 412 5 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 6198 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 797 7 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT 70 8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT 1200 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ FT 9150 10 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 7770 11 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH 9 12 REMOVE CASTING EACH 4 13 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 152 14 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 620 15 SALVAGE RC CATTLE PASS LIN FT 80 16 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 74 17 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD 10130 18 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)CU YD 500 19 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD 3130 20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SQ YD 7770 21 BASE PREPARATION SQ YD 30830 22 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 16 23 WATER MGAL 27 24 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 250 25 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (SALVAGED RECLAIM MATERIAL) (CV) CU YD 2143 26 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 30830 27 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5")SQ YD 2200 28 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD 1390 29 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (4.0")SQ YD 9780 30 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2115 31 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON 572 32 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 2310 33 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,B)TON 190 34 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 2080 35 TYPE SP 9.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C)TON 3830 36 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 3120 37 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LIN FT 1051 38 INSTALL RC CATTLE PASS LIN FT 80 39 6" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 6 40 8" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 1051 41 12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 380 42 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 187 43 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN)EACH 1 44 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 45 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2 46 8" HDPE PIPE SEWER-DIRECTIONAL DRILLED LIN FT 415 47 HYDRANT EACH 1 48 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 33 Mendota Heights Road & Kensington Street Improvements MH2014009 and MH201616 Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10 A.M., CDT Unit Price Total Unit Price Total $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 $9,077.77 $9,077.77 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $3.20 $550.40 $1.00 $172.00 $13.01 $5,360.12 $12.50 $5,150.00 $5.05 $31,299.90 $3.30 $20,453.40 $1.13 $900.61 $1.00 $797.00 $4.37 $305.90 $2.00 $140.00 $1.54 $1,848.00 $0.70 $840.00 $0.61 $5,581.50 $0.70 $6,405.00 $4.03 $31,313.10 $2.94 $22,843.80 $498.32 $4,484.88 $480.00 $4,320.00 $110.74 $442.96 $150.00 $600.00 $6.77 $1,029.04 $5.80 $881.60 $2.79 $1,729.80 $3.20 $1,984.00 $51.34 $4,107.20 $24.00 $1,920.00 $83.06 $6,146.44 $150.00 $11,100.00 $14.09 $142,731.70 $22.54 $228,330.20 $16.61 $8,305.00 $22.54 $11,270.00 $9.49 $29,703.70 $20.68 $64,728.40 $2.47 $19,191.90 $0.90 $6,993.00 $1.52 $46,861.60 $0.98 $30,213.40 $139.67 $2,234.72 $125.00 $2,000.00 $38.53 $1,040.31 $48.00 $1,296.00 $23.39 $5,847.50 $14.00 $3,500.00 $13.61 $29,166.23 $26.56 $56,918.08 $1.25 $38,537.50 $2.24 $69,059.20 $2.67 $5,874.00 $4.00 $8,800.00 $3.05 $4,239.50 $3.90 $5,421.00 $2.29 $22,396.20 $3.00 $29,340.00 $2.28 $4,822.20 $1.50 $3,172.50 $63.06 $36,070.32 $78.00 $44,616.00 $57.21 $132,155.10 $56.00 $129,360.00 $52.64 $10,001.60 $53.00 $10,070.00 $53.82 $111,945.60 $58.00 $120,640.00 $54.93 $210,381.90 $55.00 $210,650.00 $51.51 $160,711.20 $54.00 $168,480.00 $0.01 $10.51 $1.00 $1,051.00 $80.75 $6,460.00 $100.00 $8,000.00 $24.94 $149.64 $24.00 $144.00 $75.91 $79,781.41 $74.00 $77,774.00 $51.27 $19,482.60 $49.00 $18,620.00 $52.30 $9,780.10 $51.00 $9,537.00 $2,768.46 $2,768.46 $2,650.00 $2,650.00 $719.80 $1,439.60 $700.00 $1,400.00 $1,937.93 $3,875.86 $1,860.00 $3,720.00 $57.07 $23,684.05 $56.00 $23,240.00 $4,419.76 $4,419.76 $4,300.00 $4,300.00 $276.85 $9,136.05 $380.00 $12,540.00 Bidder No. 4 Max Steininger, inc. Bidder No. 5 Arnt Construction Co., Inc. 193803763-BidTab.xlsm BT-3 page 58 BID TABULATION Item Num Item Units Qty 49 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 50 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 5 51 2" AIR VENT EACH 1 52 1.5" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LIN FT 291 53 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 53 LIN FT 545 54 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 188 55 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G EACH 5 56 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 4007 EACH 5 57 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 EACH 4 58 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 EACH 2 59 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 96-4020 EACH 1 60 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 4 61 INSTALL CASTING EACH 74 62 REPAIR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DOGHOUSE EACH 17 63 REPAIR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE INVERT EACH 5 64 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 20 65 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 351 66 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 4970 67 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624 LIN FT 1228 68 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 133 69 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 80 70 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 71 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 350 72 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 53 73 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 74 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 210 75 BOULEVARD TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 340 76 SEEDING ACRE 0.2 77 SEED MIXTURE 36-711 POUND 40 78 SODDING TYPE LAWN SQ YD 2580 79 WATER MGAL 14 80 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPOXY SQ FT 300 81 4" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 5978 82 12" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 555 83 24" SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 80 84 4" BROKEN LINE EPOXY LIN FT 1100 85 24" DOTTED LINE EPOXY LIN FT 63 86 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE EPOXY LIN FT 556 87 CROSSWALK EPOXY SQ FT 504 88 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPOXY (YIELD)EACH 3 TOTAL BASE BID Contractor Name and Address: Phone: Email: Signed By: Title: Bid Security: Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Bidder No. 4 Max Steininger, inc. Bidder No. 5 Arnt Construction Co., Inc. $1,389.03 $2,778.06 $1,350.00 $2,700.00 $1,740.23 $8,701.15 $1,650.00 $8,250.00 $2,836.53 $2,836.53 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $19.79 $5,758.89 $19.40 $5,645.40 $49.87 $27,179.15 $48.60 $26,487.00 $7.23 $1,359.24 $6.50 $1,222.00 $1,766.27 $8,831.35 $1,720.00 $8,600.00 $5,535.82 $27,679.10 $5,400.00 $27,000.00 $2,029.83 $8,119.32 $1,980.00 $7,920.00 $4,355.34 $8,710.68 $4,248.00 $8,496.00 $9,338.58 $9,338.58 $9,100.00 $9,100.00 $830.53 $3,322.12 $720.00 $2,880.00 $498.32 $36,875.68 $720.00 $53,280.00 $204.86 $3,482.62 $200.00 $3,400.00 $254.70 $1,273.50 $250.00 $1,250.00 $110.47 $2,209.40 $110.00 $2,200.00 $10.47 $3,674.97 $10.60 $3,720.60 $20.40 $101,388.00 $18.40 $91,448.00 $23.87 $29,312.36 $26.80 $32,910.40 $60.08 $7,990.64 $64.00 $8,512.00 $53.40 $4,272.00 $52.00 $4,160.00 $5,873.85 $5,873.85 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $2.75 $962.50 $4.00 $1,400.00 $244.16 $12,940.48 $170.00 $9,010.00 $6,234.06 $6,234.06 $800.00 $800.00 $0.82 $172.20 $1.10 $231.00 $37.30 $12,682.00 $18.00 $6,120.00 $5,490.30 $1,098.06 $5,200.00 $1,040.00 $24.16 $966.40 $32.00 $1,280.00 $6.31 $16,279.80 $19.00 $49,020.00 $38.53 $539.42 $82.00 $1,148.00 $1.20 $360.00 $5.40 $1,620.00 $0.65 $3,885.70 $0.30 $1,793.40 $5.42 $3,008.10 $4.20 $2,331.00 $8.43 $674.40 $8.00 $640.00 $0.65 $715.00 $0.30 $330.00 $18.07 $1,138.41 $8.00 $504.00 $1.30 $722.80 $0.60 $333.60 $5.06 $2,550.24 $3.90 $1,965.60 $361.32 $1,083.96 $190.00 $570.00 $1,699,364.16 $1,925,658.58 651-454-6620 651-426-1296 bobby@maxsteininger.net narnt@arntco.com Taylor Lawrence Nicholas J. Arnt Asst. Project Manager Vice President Bid Bond Bid Bond Max Steininger, Inc. 3080 Lexington Avenue South Eagan, MN 55121 Arnt Construction Co., Inc. 2190 Phelps Road Hugo, MN 55038 193803763-BidTab.xlsm BT-4 page 59