1995-10-11 ARC Packet1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3.
r�
;
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
AGENDA
OCTOBER 11, 1995
Approval of September 6, 1995 Meeting Minutes (Available Next Week1.
'i
Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence• �
11
a. MASAC General Meeting Minutes and Technical Advisors Report for
July, 1995. � '� i
I'
i
b. MASAC General Meeting Minutes and Technical Advisors Report for
August, 1995. i
c. MASAC General Meeting Agenda Packet for August, 1995.
,
il
d. Part 150 Policy Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes for Septe�nber,
1995. � : I I
li
e. Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Commission Minutes for
August, 1995. �
f. Richfield Part 150 Buy-Out Updates for August and September, 1995.
f
g. Stop the Noise! and National Helicopter Noise Coalition Newsletter for
September, 1995.
h. NDCARC Letter ao NWA Dated September 1, 1995.
i�
� � I
5. Unfinished and New Business: �
a. Discuss Mendota Heights MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs
Statement.
b. Discuss Dual Track Airport Planning Matters.
c. Discuss GPS Presentation Scheduled for October 25, 1995.
6. Verbal Updates:
a. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures.
7. Other Comments or Concerns.
8. Adjourn.
� Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120
hours in advance. If a notic� of less than 120 hours is received, the City of
Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this
may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at
� 452-1850 with requests.
: °'
�
S t' ;i ! i .i . . : �' ,.. .. , . .
1�.�:�jJJ�i �,i 7�F/_'{�%�'i��l.i_1. ._ ' ..
,l.•�ill'�4J .:C ��S r' i�_ r, �Yt �L� t ,
j",•'t+��:,�t `, r:.�._?.: i:j."..iF.:�. � � . .. .
i
nE-ii_.),.- j•)� %��.�., u' ... .+ : •,•,. ,.
.:'1ti.l��i * . .r�� . �; ' t . .. �.. . � r
;E ... . ;.. � `•�� :� r .�,s ..�- : �,� ;
�u�f:S"s " : ' : t'�, :3 . . . •� " � � ' . � ..
\
1
,r �...�
�_�
CITY QF MENDOTA HEtGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNE50TA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMM13S10N MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
The regular meeting of fihe Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was
hetd on Wednesday, September C, 1995, in the City Hat! �arge Canfeience Room,
1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 8:07 o'clock P.M. The
following members were present: Beaty, Fitzer, �euman, Surrisi. Commissioner
Olsen had informed the Commission that he would be late. Cammissioners Olin
and Stein were excused. Also present were City Administrator Tom lawell and
Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. �
APPROVAL OF MINUTES �
�
;
Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the July 12, 1995 mi� utes.
Commissianer Fitzer seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
�
Commissioner Leuman moved approvat ofi the August 9, 1995 �
Commissioner Fitzer seconded the motion. I
AYES: 4
NAYS: 4
AGKNOWLEDGE REGEIPT OF VAR[QUS
REPl7RTS/CORRESPONDENCE
The Commission acknawledged receipt of the MASAC Agenda Packet �rom
August 22, 1995.
i
Chair Beaty pointed out that the MASAC �ommissior� acknavutedged receipt
of a letter addressed to Mayor Tom Egan, City af Eagan, from Mark Salm�n,
af Northwest Airlines, responding to the Northern Dakota �oun#y Air�part
Relations Coalition's request to address the "distar��" and "close-in"
departure procedures as outlined in FAA ,Advisory Cir�ular No. 91-53A.
Beaty stated that Mr. Salmen responded that the MASAC Operations
Committee will be evaluating the benefits of the NADPs, and that the finai
�I
determination wili be made by the MAC, not the air carriers. Beaty informed
the Commission that the Coalition disagrees with Mr. Salmen"s approach to
this issue. The �rst set of decisions related to estabiishing NADDs were
made by the air carriers, and the Coalition would like NWA to reevaluate the
decisions they have aiready made relative to this issue.
Chair Beaty noted that the ANOMS report has not been submitted for
Commission review dus to technicai difficuitiss.
Administrator laweli submitted the Operations and Complaint Summary for
July 1995. It was noted that 100 complaints were received from Mendota
Heights citizens. The Commission pointed out that 13 4 caiis were received
from St. Paul citizens. Administrator Lawell reviewed a Compiaint Summary
map. It was no#ed #hat the area south a# the Cucley Addition registered
over 10 complaints.
The Commission felt that this summer's camplaints were low due to
weather canditions being hot and humid and that most people had their
windows clased with their air conditioning on. The Commission also
discussed the possibi[ity af citizens getting tired af putting forth an effort in
complaining about air noise.
Administrator Lawell submitted a copy of the July 17, 1995 5pecial Meeting
� Minutes of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The minutes nated that
improvements of $300 million were made at Denver's Stapteton after the
decision had been made to build a new airport and that these improvements
were critical #o #he continued operation of Stapleton. The minutes also
summarized discussion about the new Denver airport and that 80 major
contracts i� the design area and 90 major contracts were involved in the
construction management. The entire project experienced 14.000 change
orders. !# was noted that general airport revenue bonds were the major
funding source with the first issue in 1989.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the July 13, 1995 MASAC
r 4perations Committee minutes. The Commission discussed a tetter of
' request from the City of Eagan's Airport Relations Commission asking far
,fitight track analysis for operatians southeast of MSP €ar the weekends of
���' April 29-30 and May 6-7. It was noted that the first weekend had
`'��' extremeiy [oud aircraft noise white the second weekend was quiet. The City
of Eagan is interested in an analysis of these two weekends in terms of
�'� '��� compliance with current corridor boundar�es and gate analysis. The City of
Eagan asked the MAC to discuss conditions of those weekends with the
FAA to determine operations or weather conditions which caused the
F'�
.4 - �:
t
4
difference in noise on the eastern edge of the Eagan. �
�
Th� Commission discussed requesting from the MASAC Clperations
Committee a special report comparing huskitted and non huskitted aircraft
fiight paths over the City of Mendota Heights. Administrator L i �weil stated
that he wouid inquire with the Committee. �
The Commission acknawiedged receipt of the South Metro Airp� rt Action
Council letter dated August 17, 1995. �j
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the NWA Letter to In�ver Grove
Heights dated August 4, 1995. Chair Beaty informed the Comm�ss�on that
the NDCARC �will continue to send carrespondence to the attention of Mr.
Salmen at NWA.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of #he Me#ropoGtan Airports
Commission "1994 Report to the Public. �
DISGUSS DUAL TRACK AtRPORT PLANNING STATUS AND
STRATEGIES FUR EFFECTIVELY PARTICiPATINC IN �
THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS I
�
Administrator Lawell explained that the Commission has been discussing the
� status of the Dual Track Airport Planning process and th� fast approaching
deadlines which wil! decide this important issue. �
Lawe!! explsined #hat Mendota Heights' position is to not give aln opinion on
the Duat Track process until the result of the study are fully known.
Lawell summarized that Dakota Coun Commissioner Bata lia h� d informed
tY 9 , ,
the Cities of Mendota Heights, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights and Sunfish �ake
that an organized group known as SOAR would be making a presentation to
the Dakota County Baard of Commissioners on the status of their efforts to
keep the new airport out of southern Dakota County. Lawell exp�lained that
SOAR`s presentation conctuded by having the County Commiss�oner who
. represents the Hastings area present a resolution which would formally
deciare that Dakota Caunty is opposed to a new airport and the� very idea af
land banking for the future. Lawell explained that representatives from the
northern Dakata County cities were able to conv�nce the other �
commissioners that this topic requires further discussion prior to the Cot�nty
taking a formal posiiian. j� "'
Lawelt exptained that this matter was tabled unit the September�'26th �
3
. �
G ' �
Dakota County Physical Development Committee meeting. He stated that
the Commission should spend time discussing the City's position before
appearing before the County Board on September 26th.
With respect to long term lobbying efforts, Chair Beaty stated that the
Commission should consider taking a position on whether the airport should
stay or be moved. He stated that Mendota Heights' real frustration is the
air noise issue. Beaty suggested that the City consider being in favor of
moving the airport unless specific terms are met such as narrowing the
existing corridor and equitable distribution noise.
The Commission discussed the County's concern for selective land banking
and commercial land banking.
Commissioner Surrisi inquired if the City is aware of the community's
opinion on whether the airport should stay or be moved. She stated that a
number of Mendota Heights residents have moved to this community due to
the proximity of the airport. Commissioner Beaty stated that a survey could
be conducted but that he is concerned about uninformed opinions and that
the community needs to be educated more about the air noise problem.
Administrator Lawell explained that the City has conducted surveys in the
past on other non-airport related topics. Commissioners Surrisi and Olsen
agreed that a survey may prove useful.
� Chair Beaty stated that if the �airport stays in place, we need to know how
the community of Mendota Heights be protected from air noise.
Administrator Lawell reviewed biographical information on key legislators
who are involved in transportation matters. Specifically, legislators who are
involved on the House Transportation and Transit Committee, the Senate
Transportation and Public Transit Committee and the Senate Transportation
and Public Transit Finance Division Committee. Chair Beaty noted that there
are several out state committee members. The Commission discussed the
possibility of hiring a professional lobbyist. Chair Beaty suggested that the
City Council consider pursuing a professional lobbyist who specializes in
transportation issues. Commissioner Olsen suggested that the NDCARC
'" " should become involved and should be the organization to pursue a
professional lobbyist. He stated that a common position amongst the Cities
makes for a better stand. Commissioner Surrisi concurred. Chair Beaty
stated that the Cities of Sunfish Lake and Inver Grove Heights may be close
to Mendota Heights' stand on moving the airport. -
The Commission suggested that if the airport stays, then the following
4
shauld accur:
1. Shrink corridor as new technotogy permits.
2. Equitable distribution of noise i
3. NAPD standards, better use of Stage III aircraft '
4. Nighttime standards ;
5. Define corridar boundaries and implement fines for naise violation
fi. Move general aircraft to reliever airpart �
7. Not construct #hird parallel runway until 2015 �
�
Commissioner Surrisi wondered if the MAC is of the opinion that the airport
will never be moved. �he also stated that same people believe�that in the
future, people will be traveling less due to increased technology.
Commissioner Surrisi stated that the airport will probably have ��o be moved
and that if that airport does stay, then we will have to live with{ it. She
stated that she is convinced that the MAC cannot meet our canditions.
Chair Beaty stated that the City should try its best to require tFiat these
conditions be met and that the media should be informed. �
t
The Commission discussed that by modifying the corridor departure
pracedures, overflights wouid be limited over papuiated areas. �
�-
The Commission discussed inciuding other surrounding� City interests and
not just focusing o� Mendota Heights interests. I
I
In response to a request €rom the Commission, Administrator �aweli stated
he would get a progress report on the mediation process and expenses from
Metropotitan Council staff member Nacho Dias. �
i
The Commission discussed how the City needs to be mare asse,rtive in
dealmg with the mequitable distr�bution of no�se and that fihe C�ty needs to
be more specific in letting the MAC know that Mendota Heights' is receiving
the brunt of the air noise.
The Commission discussed better use of the carridor during nan{ peak haurs.
Chair Beaty suggested that nan peak hours be defined as 10:30�p.m. to
6:00 a.m. The Commission discussed day time operations and how Chair
Beaty's suggestian woutd not include these operations. Commissioner
Surrisi suggested that the corridor could best be defined and used when
there is no potentiai conflict. ;�
Commissioner Surrisi was excused at 10:28 o'ctock P.M.
5
The Commission discussed noise abatement departure procedures and how
Stage 3 aircraft will help minimize the noise impact on populated areas. The
Commission discussed implementing nighttime restrictions and how fines
could be incorporated if the restrictions are not adhered to by the airlines.
Commissioner Olsen stated that he does not want to see a growth in
nighttime procedures. The Commission was of the consensus that Stage 2
aircraft should not be allowed to fly during nighttime operations.
Commissioner Olsen stated that the airport should not stay if the north
parallel runway is to someday be constructed. He stated that a north
parallel runway should not be considered until the capacity on the
north/south runway is maximized.
DISCUSS UPDATE OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
AIRPORT NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
The Commission was of the consensus to table this discussion until their
October 11, 1995 meeting.
VERBALUPDATES
Administrator Lawell discussed the status of implementing the non-
simultaneous crossing procedure. Lawell stated that he has requested
Y copies of the recently modeled contours from HNTB.
Administrator Lawell stated the City Council will be reviewing the
Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport Area Community Protection Concept Package at
their September 13 workshop.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commission moved to
adjourn its meeting at 10:50 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
�
9
�
J
s�
,� Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airport �
.._ ......._.
MOIVTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Airport Sound Abatement Council
cna;,�,wn•
RoberlP John.00
Vice CMirman:
s�e e„nto
Techniml Advuor:
Jahn Fo�a
Secxtmy:
ra+c �i,wo
er.eo,� �.,,:
e� sac�
AisTinmporf Ar:oeiation:
ewi tK�c.o..
��:
c�.�n w. caRy �R
cy cjEroom;,�gron:
Petrma Lee
v� wu�:
c;� �e�tra:
Jm Rfvr
�a ��a�:
nn.em nftdd�
Ciy cflmerGroveHeighLr:
Demt� Maddm
Ciry cfMe�domHeighLr:
JtI1 SmIfh
,("ity ojMinneapo!'v:
l�a B.9eze�
loho Rkhter
Joe Lee
Judith Dodpe
Ciy ejRid��e(d:
c�o.� s.rn..
n� ra�
c� ysr.t�x.ra,�:
Roeae �d,�,..
�ry cf St. PeuL•
9ood H�mia
cr.� c. w�d�
Caml Am MeCnire
Del1a Airlinnlne:
�� ��
F��i�.::
To� Rhdnmdc
Fedemt Aviation AdmfnirhnHon:
Beuce Wasooa
�a cmn
MACSfod`r
Didc I{dus
MBM:
Robat P. Johosm
MuaGa Narthveat Ai�IG�F
I.awrmce MeCabe
Metropoliran A;rpa.tr conuntr.rien:
Commiaima Alioa Ga�
MNAbNa�iaal Gmd:
M�jor Mart !. IV�r
Nortlwut A(rUra:
Ma�t s.�m�
I.�cr� s.�
s�. r� cr�,�c��:
Jxk Baektry
s� c�r,y �;�rt,�..:
c�a �. c��
UrutadAirlinulx.:
Allao Tamlinsoa
Uniled Paml Serviee:
i.md no.�
us.�;�F�R�:
Capmio sea.m chapm.n
us.s�a�,�wrca,.r�:
e�nRt �. n�
Metropolitan Airports Commission
� Declaration of Purposes
1.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve public interest, convenience.
and necessity; promote sir navigation and transportation, intemational, national; state,
and local, in and thraugh this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical
handling of air commerce: assure the inclusion of this state in national and international
programs of air transportafion; and to those ends to cievelop the full potentialities of the
metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center. and to correlate that area with all
aviatiaai facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and
e£fective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area;
2.) Assure the residents af the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact
from air navigation and transportatio�, and to that ead pravide for noise abatement.
control of airport aiea land use, and other protective measures; and
3J Pr�ote the overall goals af the state's envu'onmental policies and minimi�P �
public's exposure to noise and safety hazards azound airports.
Metropolitan Aincraft Sound Abatement Council
Statement of Purpose
This cc�rporatian was formed in furtheran�e of the general welfare of the communities
adjoining IVTinneapolis-S� Paul Inbernati�al A�ort - Wold-C�amberlain Field. a
public sirport in the Crnmty of Heanepin, State of ' , through the alleviati� of
the problems created by the sound of aircraft using the airport; through study and
evaluatian on a continuing basis of t}�Se problem and of suggestiaa for the alleviari� of
the sam�; thraugh initiation. coordination and pr�motian of reasonable and effective
procedures, control and regulatians. consistent with the safe operation of the airport and
Of i11I�[Sft 11S1Dg th� SBID�: SIId �ll�1g�1 d1SSen13IIAtlOII Of ]IIfOitIIACIOII t0 t� 8ffCCt�
communities, their affe�ted residents, and die users of the sirport respecting the
problem of sincraft noise m�isance and 'm respect to suggestions mAde and scdons
initiabed and talaen to alleviate tl�e prablem: '
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
Representation
The membership shall inrlude representatives appointed by agencies. corporations.
associati�s and govesnmental bodies wh�ch by reasan of their statutary authority and
respomsibility or control wer tt�e sirport. o� by reasoa of their status as airport users,
have a direct interest in the operation of the sirpork Such members will be called User
Representatives and Public Represe�tatives, pravided that the User Representafives and
Public Representatives shall flt all timeS be equal in IIumber.
The Airpoct ?�l-l�our Noise Hotline is 726-9411.
Complaints to the hotline do not nsult in changes
in Airpon activiry, but provides a public sounding
board and airport information outlet The hotline
is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday
This repart is prepared and printed in house by
Roy Fuhrmann and Traci Erickson
Questiona ar comments may be dimcted to:
MAC - Aviafion Nadse Program
l�finntapolis / St Paul International Airport
G040 28W Avenue South
M'inneapolis, MN 55450
Tel: (612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) 726-5296
Metropolitan Airports Commission Aaiation Noise Programs ,�
,
ontents
Operations and Complaint Summary I
-. Operations Summary - All Aircraft ..................................................!!.................................1
MSP July Fleet Mix Percentage ........................................................ �!.................................1
� Airport July Complaint Summary .....................................................! �.................................1
July Operations Summary - Airport D'uectors Office ......................! �.................................1
Minnea olis - St. Paul International Air ort Com laint Summa 2
p P P �'3'
ComplaintSummary by City ............................................................. I.................................2
Tower Log Reports 3
AllHours ...........................................................................................!!.................................3
Ni8� �
ttime Hours ..................................................................................................................3
� AllOperations 4
RunwayUse Report July 1995 ........................................:................: �.................................4
Carrier Jet Operations 5 � i
RunwayUse Report July 1995 ........................................................ I...............................5
' , �i I �
Nighttime - All Operations 6
Runway Use Report July 1995 ..........................�....� ....................
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 7
�
...............................6 •
RunwayUse Report July 1995 .........................................................! �.................................7
� � i �
Carrier Jet Operations by Type 8 '
Aircr.aft Identi,�er and DescriptionTable 9 !�
_ I
Runway Use - Day/Night� Periods - All Operations 10
Da' e Hours ...................................................................................f
Y� . ' .............................10
_ �i'
Community OverflightAnalysis 11
Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours ................................................... � �.............................11
..I ..
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (l lpm - 6 am) ...:......................... �...............................11
Aviation No�se Programs
�
Remote Monitoring Site Locations 12
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 13
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 14
Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identi, fied
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identifzed
15
16
l7
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise E�vents Identified 18�
z
�� Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
�.:
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
Flight Track Base Map 21
�
20
- f
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring Systems Flight Tracks 22
Carrier Jet Operations - July 1995 .....................................................................................22
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 23
Carrier Jet Operations - July 1995 .....................................................................................23
Analysis of Aircra, ft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
Analysis of Aircraft Npise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
�
Aviatian Noise Programs �
24
25
r
n
r
�
�
. Metropolitan Airports Commissian
�
Operations and Complaint 5ummary
� July 1995
Operations Summary - All Aircraft .
.;::::;...:.::::::......> ::::.....::.:.:.:...: :...::::::::...:: ..::.:::::: ,:;;�>.::.::.:��:::........,, :.....: ......-.::;�>;::�:;;:.....::.::::........: .
�::, :.::.::�::: �.;. ., .,:
...:..: ;:.:;;;..;.;::.. ...
> :: .::. :, . . . .....
:; :. :: : . ......... :.:. :.:...:..:..:....::
.:::::::::.::: ::::::� �::;���r..: ��. . .: : ��:::;:::`:�::::�.�'��� .: :::� �::��:..::.:.:...�::..�:..�:: ::::. .:.���><��': :;
;. ::.
��:�..:{ . ::
::.: ..:.::� : .... ...:: � � ::..:: :. : :: :: .::. .::..:.::.: ::::.:.:.:.:: .. :. . . ..
04 203 1.2% 38 0.2% � 1
22 333 1.9% 836 5.0°Io li �
11 5724 33.8% 6239 37.3% �
29 10698 63.1% 9601 .575%� I
MSP July Fleet Mix Percentage j�
Stage 2 61.0% 53.0°Io 61.3%
Stage 3 39.0°l0 47.0°!0 38.7%
Airport July Complaint Summary
53.7% �
46.3%i
July Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office
� Aviati� Naise Programs . , .
�
' �,���+� y.Y.hf' u . ,
rr
. , aa•.z��_.� . , , .
Page 1
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport Complaint Summary� +
July 1995
Comptaint Summary by City �
Page 2
.:::::::::::::.:.:::.::::::::::..:::::.:.::�:::::::..::::::::..;:;;:::.::�.:; ;.:::::::,;::::::::.:.:.:.:.�..:..:.::.: ::.....�.:;:� ;::::::::.:.::...:.;:.:. .>�::::..:::�::::..:.:::..�....::::::,: ::�::;;::::.:::.....:::.......::::::,:
. .. :.::. . :: :::
: .: ... ::: :.::.:.: ::.:;:.;:. :, ;: ;���:,,:.::.:..::..:.:�::::<..,:;... :: :: .
.:.> :..�:�: ::.::..: .:.�:. . .::_.,::<.::,::<���., : ::.. :.::::..:.::.::.: . :.::..:..:.:
�. :.:..;::::. :::°:.:;;:::.::;:::�rt: ::: :.: :::::::::. ::.::.. :.:. :::.:: ::......;;�;�r��:::::...:: :..:: :. . . � ::tr��<..;: ::........:.'�.o...�::..:..:..:: :>.:�'e���� �...:
A le Valle 0 19 19 0.9%
Arden Hills 11 31 42 2.0%
Bloomin ton 2 29 31 1.4%
Burnsville 0 27 27 1.3%
Circle Pines 0 1 1 0.1%
Columbia Hei hts 0 1 1 0.1%
Ea� an 53 309 362 17.4%
Eden Prairie 0 4 4 0.2%
Edina 0 47 47 2.2%
Falcon Hei hts 0 1 1 0.1%
Inver Grove Hei ts 3 56 59 2.8%
Little Canada 0 1 1 0.1%
Medina 0 1 1 0.1%
Mendota. Hei hts 8 92 100 4.8%
Minnea olis 103 1023 1126 54.2%
Minnetonka 2 4 6 0.3%
Oakdale 2 6 8 � 0.4%
Pl mouth 1 5 6 0.3%
Richfield 5 96 101 4.9%
Roseville 1 2 3 0.1%
Shoreview 0- 1 1 0.1%
South St. Paul 0� 2 2 0.1%
St. Lottis Park 5 5 10 0.5%�
St. Paul 91 23 ;' 114 5.4%
W. St. Paul 0 1 1 0.1%
Wa zata 1 1 0.1%
:;:.:>::<:<:.;;>:::�::::.:.�:;:::`>���:�::;:��::::::��:::�;:>.::�:.::::>�::>:��<:>::::::<:�:: ::>::��:::>::::::.:>:.:::::;.:::::::::::•��:: ::�:;:::::>:<:>::::::<.;r.:>.;::::.;»;;::.> :::: �.:>:::::.>:;:;.:;<:.:;.:;::>.:::.:..; :;�:.:.::::> ::::::.::::::.::,:>�:�::::::�:�:.:::
.,;;.;..;:� .:.. . .: :. ... .:.:: :..;:.: . :.::.:;:� �: :> :::;�:>:::-::;�::::.>: :::. � <::::>:;::. :::::::<:�<:::<::::� :;. >:
:::<::::::::: ::�:��.:. .::�:���1.:: �:::::;.�::.<: ::::: ::::::::: :::>. ::::<::>�:��`.. .:. :. .:;.�....: .:�� :..�;::.; ; :.:..:.:::�::�.: . . :;�;. :: :::::<::::>�::> :. ::>:>:�� ::
� .. t .. ..... � . . ........ �.... .. :..:.�:::: ��?�`a.:.:..
Time of Day • Nature of Complaint
Aviati� No�se Programs " � � � '
.', '
�
Tower Log Reports
July 1995
Alt Hours
;� ��:1:�a�::
�. �
Nighttime Hours
�
� Aviatia� Naise Programs
Metr I litan Airports Commissian
�
1
Page 3
All Operations
Runway Use Repor
t July 19 5
.,.:.:�`:�:�
P� 4 Aviatian Noise Programs
Garrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Repor
t July 19 5
�..: �� Q:�::�
� �..:...
Aviati� Noise Programs
Airports Commission
Page 5
�a
t,•
Nighttime - All Operations
Runway Use Repor
t July 19 5
.;.:::�:�:�:
Page 6 Aviation Naise Programs
.
�
Metropolitan Air�arts Co�mmission
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report July 19 5
,:::«:-:�:�
P�� �
�
��.
F••
Carrier Jet Operations by Type
July 1995
,.:.:::�ic��ir�,i��:�.::~:;.:::::�::.'>:::; <�::>:�:.:..,..:.,:::::::::::::; :::.:..::.::::.. .. . ..
. .: : : : . . .: : . : . : ::; :: � :. : :.;;.: : . .: : .. :
:.. .:..:�:: :: : .�.:�:.:: `�.'�`tx: :, :: ...<:..�`s��.. :: ;:�:'�'�i�i��:::;
B727H 202 0.9%
DC9H 1498 6.8%
B707 2 0.0%
B733/4/5 1177 5.4%
B747 171 0.8%
B74F 12 0.1%
B757 1787 8.2%
B767 1 0.0%
DA10 6 0.0%
DC10 800 3.6%
DC87 138 0.6%
EA32 1964 9.0%
FK10 1067 4.9%
L1011 13 0.1%
,
NID11 57 0.3%
NID80 " 1236 5.6%
BA10 5 0.09'0
BAll 0 0.0%
B727 4066 18.6%
B737 558 2.6%
DC8 64 0.3%
DC$6 2 0.0%
DC9 � 6990 32.0%
FK28 52 0.2%
:;>:�.:�..;;:;;<::<.::.;.:;;>�.;:.,.:r:.:::.::::.:; .:
.;:,:.;. .
.::t.;,..: : .
:::�'��::
. .... .....:......:.::.:.
............. ..
<:<<:��':�`�::�.:.::::�'?? ::: :<;::��.�::: �:.�.:.:; ::
:.:.:.: .. ..
:.,.::::. :.::.:
:.::,
:;.::;:; . .. :::::
.:... ..... :.;�, :
,.:;::<.:. ,.::. ._:..:
..:<;::;,:::,:.:
P� 8 Aviati� Naise P,rograms ,-., �
46.3% Stage �
�
53.7°/a Stage II
�
.;
�
B�z�
B727H
B707
B733
- B737
B73S
B747
B74F
B757
B767
BAII
BEC
BEl
BE80
BE99
CNA
DC10
DCS
DC8S
DC86
DC87
DC9
EA32
FK10
. FK28
FK27
r---
L1011
1VID11
IVID80
SW3
SW4
SF34
Aircraft Identifier and DescriptionTable
:� �. � ::�;�����::�;�.��:�>. .:::�:':: �:�_.
BOEING 727
BOEING 727 - HIJSH KTT
BOEING 707
BOEING 737-300
BOEING 737 �
BOEING 737 200 S�.S
BOEING 747
BOEING 747 FREIGHTER
BOEING 757
BOEING 767
BRTITSH AIItOSPACE 111
BEECHCRAFT (ALL SERIFS)
BEE(�iCRAFT 1900
BEFCCH(�1FT KIl�TG AIlt °
BEECH(�tAFT QUEIN AIIt
CFSSNA (ALL SIItIF.S)
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC10
M(�ONNELL DOUGLAS DCS
MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 STREIY�i
M(�ONNELL DOUGLAS D�8 GO-SERIF.S
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 70-SERIFS RE
M((�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC9
AIItBUS INDUSTRIF.S A320
FOKI�[t 100
FOKI�[t F28
- FOKI�t F27 (PROP)
LOf'I� TRISTAR L1011
MCDONNELL DOUGL.AS I3C11
Mc�orrivII.L nouc�.�s � sas�s
SWEARINGEN METROLINER 3
� SWEARINGEN METROLINER 4
SAAB 340 .
Aviati� Noise Programs �
Airports Commission
� Page 9
►Q
t.•
Runway Use - Day/Night Periods - All Operations
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport July 1995
Daytime Hours
Nighttime Hours '
Page 10 �� Aviatian Naise Programs p�� �
i
Metrogolitan Airports Commzssion
Community Overflight Analysis ��
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport Juiy 1995
Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours �
Over So, Minneapolis/
No. Richfield
Over So. Richfield/
Blaomington
Over St. Paul -
Highland Fazk
Over Eagan/
Mendota Heights
Over So. Minneapolisl
No. Richfield
Over So. Richfield/
Bloomington
Over St, Paul -
Highland Park
Over EaganJ
Mendata Heights
.. ...� ,::.::...:
: : .::.
. : ,:::::
' .'��::: .:;:
a
3701
110
197
7004
6172
S97
�7
4080
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (11pm - b am)
33
28
46
418
�
�
54
26
4
��
Aviation Naise Programs
$7
54
�
SQ
513
45.2°
I' 1
,
3.2 �I
�
Q9 I
SQ.7°
:i
12.4 �o
7.6%
t�
,
7.1%
I�
��.� !O
��
:
:
..
�
.
f s •
Pa,ge 11
Remote Monitoring Site Locations
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System
Page 12 Aviation Noise Programs �--- '.
• � Metrapt
I
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events ;
" July 1995
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
?A
Count of Arrival Aircraft Naise Events for Each RMT
Minneapolis
14tiuneapaiis
Minneapolis
' apolis
Minneaperlis
Mauneapolis
Richfield
� M'inneapalis
St Pau2
St. Paul
St. Paul
Mendata F%ights
Eagan
Mendota H�eights
��
Bloamington
Richfield
Blaomington
Richfieid
Inver Grave �3eights
Inver Grwe Heights
Mendota Heights
��
Xerxes Avenue & 41st Sbrcet
Fremont Avenue�& 43rd Street
W Elmwood Stre�et & Belmant Avenue
Oakland Avenue & 49th Street
12th Avenue & 58th Street
25th Avenue & 5'7th Stre�t
Wentworth Ave & 64th Street
Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Strcet
Saratoga Street & �IArEfard Avenue
Itasca Avenue c� Bowdoia Street
Finn 5trcet & Sch�.ffer Avenue
Sou#i�ast ead of Mohicau Court
First Street & NI�Kee Street
Cullen Stre�t & Lexingtao. Avenue
Avalon Avenue & V'�las La�e
84th Street & 4th Avenue
75th Street c� 17th Avenue
16th Avenue & 84th Street
75th Street St 3rd Aveaue
Barbara Aven�e & 67th SEreet
Ann,� Marie Trail
End of Kendan Avem,�e
{�anel Lane & Wren Laue
* Site 12 is curnendy being relocated due to city street impravements.
1794
1431
1622
1537
1345
1150
153
230
192
232
48
176
2596
708
3516
; i48
144
36
41
203
2207
1370
2207
�
37
236
722
473
937
792
23
14
122
161
2
7
41
17
1761
4b
31
3
4
6
10
•22
252
Airports Commissi�
1
Q
24
3
23b
247
1
0
s
5
1
Aviatian Naise Programs I I � Page 13
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
Juiy 1995
Count of Departure Aircraft Naise Events for Each RMT
::;::>:<::::.;.:;:; :....:::::::::.::........:.:..:.........::;:::::: .-;.:;;.;:.:.....,.;,;;,;.:......:::�:;:::.......;::..�:........;::.�::.:....:.;;:;:>:::..:...:>:::::>�:::•::��;::::....,...::::..::::::..:�::.:.;..:.,...:.>:..:; :.::.,.:.�:.: .:<:.:.;.,...:...,::.,:....._:;:;.:.
:.>:.:�. ::::..:. . . .
:::::: ;,. .:: ... . : .
::....� .. .:.. :.:.:.... .. :;: ::<:: >;::::;�
:.
:.:r::. ; : .:...: ......... .. ::....: . ..
. .� .:::. ... .... . .. , ..
;<::.:::� : . :: :::. > ::: ::::::::. ,. :: :::::::.:.: : . ;:::::::::::::::. ::: . ...: :.:. .: :�:;.:.: :: :�
,;:::::.:..:. <::::::: . . . . ::::::::;;:; ::..... ::::::.;{::;.,:.. ;>:<::>:.::�::::.:::::>:::::::::: �:.::>. . . <:: :: > :;�:..:�::.::��:.:::::�:: �: .:��en ....... ::���..r�'::;;::.:
:::.:.�.�'�`.:. : ..::� ..:::::. . ..:.:::. ...�:::.>� :.:: .: :..::::..:::...,.:.�.....:..: ..... .. ......:...:. ..:..:...... .:..:....:::....;:,��+e'�: : <:>::::'���.:: .:::.::::::::::.:�:.:...::.::::::.e:::�:..:
:>::...::.::�: <.:� :.:.:.:.:.:: :.:�:. ::::::;::.::: .... : ;..:: ::.;:.::.:>:.::.:.. :.::._ <
:. ��:���::�:��>`:;.::::;:;<:::>::_.:::::»:::;::>::::::::::;:::::>::.::.::;:;:.;:;::;:>::.::::=:::>:;.:,.::.;:_;:;:;:.::<:::::=::::::<:�;:;:.::.:::;._,:::.::::;;.
;:::_::::::>:�:_:::;:>_::>::»:::::;::;� ::::::::::::.:>::>: :� ..:;:::::<::>:<:::::»<:>:::.:::::>:-: . �o�� . ..
:::::, ::: . . .::::..:... .:.::.::::: :..:.�: ��� :::.:::.::::..::.... :...:���.�: :.::.:::::::::::.::::.::.�:::::::::::...:._:..�..�:.::::.r::::::>::. : .:. ... ::.�: .:::. ...
:.:.:..�:: � ::::::: ::::::::..:.::::. ::::.�.:.:�.:::,:..::::.:.:.::. .::.::...................::::.:.:......:.:::........:::.: .:::.:.::.::.:.�:::::.::..�::, : ::. ::<:_ :>:�::.. .. . �::::::>: ;:::: : : .::
.. .. ...
:.� :::::: : :..:::::.:. .::::::. ..::::::.::::::::::.:::::::.::: <.:::.::. ::::. ::::.::::-._:.:<:.;:.::::::..,.:»>:..:::::.:.::.;:.::.:.. .. .�.::::::::.. .:::;:.:::: : :,. .. .. . :;:.;:. .: ... .���<::.: ::..:�-�.�i���.:<::.::..��.�.i���;.:
..::::.�.�:::.... : :.� ..::. .::.:::::.. .: :.�:.:::. .. :.:::.::;.:: .::<.>;:�:::..::::::.:... :..�:.:.. .:.�,.:::�. :::.:.._: ::::;..:.:: ::�:��.;..�.::. �>::.:�...:::::.:.. .. > ...::.::.:::...::.�::...:: . .:.:::::. .:..:..:::..:...
1 N�'inneapoiis Xerices Aveuue & 41st Street 926 253 2 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue•& 43rd Street 1251 �29 12 0
3 M"inneapolis W Elmwaod Su�et c� Belm�t Avenue 2725 655 125 6
4 M'znneapoiis Oakiand Avenue & 49th Sireet 3354 1144 2b6 19
5 Nlinneapolis i2th Aveut�e & 58th Str�et 5957 3519 1532 355
6 M'wn.eapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Stre�t 7021 3853 1723 750
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 3287 1112 145 3
8 Minneagalis Laugfallow Avenue & 43rd Street 23 i2 Sb2 89 6
9 S� Paul Sarawga Street cR� Harlfard Avenue 54 10 Q 4
lp S� Paul Itasca Avenue � Bowdoin Sireet 1312 37 3 1
11 S� Paul Finn Street 8c Scheffer Avenue 343 IS 4 0
...:.......... ....:....... :::.:.::.....:.:.: ::.:........:::.�::::::..:.::,,; ..... .....:.... ............,.::..:�.:...::...:.......:.:: :.:.. .: . ...... ......
p :::::{:i:::;;:::::'>:
`<.:>{:f:::'.:;:::€ `:::
:;:�:;� r:::: ::: :<�:::>:
< .::.....:....... ....... ..... . ...:....... .. .. . . . .
{ {. .:-��r;=�:::::>'s�:;;: �:� :<:::.�: ::r:.:.:;:.. :: :?�>�:::<<r::��;::::- �:::>-:� �<:: .
��,..:•;:::>;>,� .� �,>�::.;:<:::>: :.:.; .... .:.::.::: ..:..::::.;:..,..:::::..::.::::>;:<: ..;.;;,:.:;.::.;:.<::;;:;.:�:.::::.;:::;.;:; �.;:.:::<F::;,��:>:::::,<:,:,;:.,::::.:<:::::::::»;::::;::.,.:.:
;........... .......:::::::::. .:: .. :.. .:., . . ,. ..
.......... . .,:.::.:._::::... ..:.
:....:.:, .: .. ...,... . �::.:.:;
:>:: ... :...:: :: :.::::::::: .::.>:::.;:->:.»>.>:. :::. .. :.:::::::.:.:::.: .,:.rr.. . :. �.. y.: . _ .., .::::f.::::-......n.... ..
.. .. ... ,. .. ..........:,:: �:�-
y . :::: .....,,.. .
:::.:..
.::<.:.:.:
:::r.:.:,-�.. . ,:.� ::.::....::..:..:.......:: . ... . .,.:.......r:., .:-.. :.: . . . :. ..:.:::. ..:::•:
. ...... .....�..r.. .. . ..... . :::;::.:=•�:: :.:::::..:x}.::. .,.::�:•.t:..:::;r.;r•:.: ;::. ... ............" ';':::x: �...
.... ._..i[�......... r.::::zxt�>:�:::�kr.�4.�bi:::�:x-:i:•:::�:.a:.:::.:n•:���.��. .�...`.i7V..�Ei��i���,.�����::::,:::...:.:.�..a .:........... .... .:..... ........:....,........,...............;...: .........,-
:ry .� :...... .......:.. .... :.. ................................. ......... ............:: ......
.. rr . .... . . ....... .. . . . . . .. . . �.........:.t�::: •::::::::::....w. r::. v.: :r�::::.:.. ::::.::� }s:::: �:
rr/.; .r
�:i{i:
�
'} 13 . Men�ota Heights Southeast end of Mohican. C�rt 1974 S68 37 0
14 Eagan First Stre�t & McKee StY+eet 2246 362 59 3
15 Mendata Heights G`�tllen Street &. Lexington Avenue 3191 69i $9 7
16 Eagau Ava2od Avenue & Y�Ias Laue 340Q 1345 29� 2G
17 Bloomingkon 84tlx Stieet & 4th Aven�e � 724 121 21 1
18 Richfield 75th Strcet & 17kh Avenue 1185 344 136 13
19 Bloamington lbth Avenue & 84th Stz+�t 774 339 12b b
20 Richfie2d 75th Street c� 3rd Avenue 631 86 17 1
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue 8c 67th Strcet � 1333 . 305 0 0
22 Inver Grrne Heights Anne Marie Trail 1316 200 2 0
23 . � Meadata Heights End of Kend� Avem�e 3880 1287 6']2 94
24 Eagsn Cbapel Lane & Wir�n La�e 1573 21$ 55 1
* Site 12 is curm,ntly being relacated due to city street unprwements.
Page 14 Aviakion Na�se Pragrams
0
Metropolitan Airports Commission
I
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
I
RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S�
Minneapolis
... ........ .. : :: � � .:��:::::.., .,.:.. `:��:.:.>', ;:::: :.... .... .
°��� . �:�<�ii�i�::::. .:.
: ::: :
.,...
:: . ..:..... :.: :. : : :�;�:;:: :;
. :: ;; ..�:�::.>::�:::<:: `:'��::�'r�:`�.<: .>:::�:.::: :::::::;.::
. ::�.::: ..� :
:s::>;:�;;::;:::::::;::::`:;:>}:�;:�:�:;.>�:..:<.:>::: :::::::.:;:;;...:....; <...:�:�::::::;;::::..•:::..:� :::...........:.::
.. ...... . .. .............. ...................... .....................
07/15�'9516:11:11 B727 91.7 � ��D
07/30/95 20:41:08 B727 90.8 D
07/�02/95 21:27:34 DC9 905 A
07/Z4/9513:03:28 B727 88.5 D
07/09/9516:22:28 B727 88.1 D
07/30/'95 20:11:24 B727 87.6 D
0721/'9519:54:15 DC9 87.0 D
07/30/9517:05:16 B727 86.9 D
07/19/'95 8:13:40 B727 86.8 D
07/08/95 21:02:39 B727 86.7 D
RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
Minneapolis -
....... . . ....... .......;.:.::: ..::::.:.....
. �:::.���:���::<::`:<::�:::;:<;;:.:.>:. �:.
:::���:��'�:
. >.:.>.....:: :: ..
. .`��.i�i�:`:��� .;.>:::: :::;�:;
:: ::.
.::�:::��� �
: ::.:::: ..:......... :.,:.::. : ...<:
. ....
..._,. � .:..
: ..... :.:....:. � ..::. ::: .:.
: .. : : . . :. .: :; : � .;: ..; . . .
: <.:�
: ::::....,..::::. .:,:; ..:: .:...: :::: � ��:.;.:::
07/ll/95 21:23:14 B727 101.9 D
. 07/16/'9511:46:32 B727 101.8 D
07/16/9516:51:57 B727 100.9 D
07/17/'95 9:38:35 B727 100.8 _ D
07I'l2/95 17:19:57 DC9 100.8 - D
07/19/'95 7:16:43 . B727 100.7 D
07/Ol/'95 9:51:31 B737 99.9 D
07/Ol/'9517:05:45 B727 99.7. D
07/ZO/9513:04:50 DC9 99.6 D
07I20/9510:17:44 B727 995 D
RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
�� � ::�#e:�'ii��:>:�
07/31/95 9:27:39
07/22J95 11:45:24
07i05/'9519:04:28
07/10/9510:32:17
07�28/9519:49:41
07r24/95 13:03:15
07l20/9516:10:06
07I21I95 10:48:49
07r13/9519:45:31
07/13/'9514:05:01�
B727
B727
B727
B727
B727
B737
B737
B727
B727
B737
97.5
95.2
93.7
93.6
93.5
93.4
93.3
92.8
92.0
90.6
RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St.
11
Minneapolis �
ii
07/18/95 9:38:14
07/Z2/95 9:33:37
07/l3/95 9:46:22
07/L9/95 9:30:43
�07I23/9517:10:46
07I2()/9511:49:44
07I23/95 9:54:55
07I20/'9519:46:30
07/�6I'9517:42:34
07�21/95 20:11:43
Aviation Naise Programs
�
B727
DC9
B727
DC9
B727�
B727
B727
102.8
102.3
101.9
101.9
101.8
lO1S
101.4
101.3
101.2
101.1
Page 15
Ten Loudest Aircra�t Noise Events Identified
RMT #5: 12th Ave. & S8th S�
Minneapolis
RMT #7: Wentworth Ave, & 64th S�
Richfield
Page 16 � Aviation Noise Programs
RMT #6: 2Sth A�ve. & 57th St.
Minneapolis
RMT #8: Longfeltow Ave. & 43rd St.
Minne2tpolis
i
M�tiO�011��Il ��lI�}ItS �OIl1IIliSSIOIl
I
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #9: Saratoga S�. & Hartford Ave. RMT #14: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St»
;
St. Paul S� Paul,
. :��:;�:��>::` `�.::.;;:<>��:�'��"::::::s
:;?:�.��;;;:�itli'`:�;;:;:,.;..:'»:;:; .�
.:.:��:`>:::< �<:..:. ..
::i f•.:::f:::::��:��:�:�:
i;.:::::::::::;. •:
...�..:�:•:::::�::�::•:::�:::::. �. '�''.�„
.. .'•.�'r.��^��'<� �. `t':ii4G��'i �' �
:: :.:::::.:.:
. '��.:
..k:: •`
...........:..... ...........
i:'t:;:::
07102195 22:h0;48 B721 96.8 A
07C3Ql951Q:47:44 DC9 91.4 A
0'7/US/'9511:Op:21 B727 90.9 A
0'7I05!'9510:57:28 B73'7 90.7 A
071"Z1195 2f}:{?4:31 DC8 9Q.4 A
07/03/9510:44:22 B727 902 A
07l30/9512:41.30 DC1Q 89.8 A
07l1419S 20:50:06 B72'7 89.7 A
07/Z9/9515.16:4& B727 89.3 A
0'l�ll/9512:56:01 B727 87.8 A
RMT #11: Finn Si. & Scheffer Ave.
S�. Paul .
0710819S2i.02:39 B'727,� 102.4 D
47/l5/95 8:57:13 B'73? �, I 99.6 D
07R0/9�5 0:12:55 B727 �� 98.1 D
07l2419518:52:30 DC9 i� 9b.2 A,
07R1195 4.29:26 DC1U � 96.0 A
07/30/9S 12:42:08 DC10 � 96.0 A
07/ll/9S 5:23:47 DC10 � 95.5 A
Ofil24/'�5 20:50:41 B'737 �� 95.5 D.
07112/'95 4.25:47 B?27; � 95.4 A
p7/12�95 10:18:27, B727 �� 89.5 A
i�
R;MT #12; Alton Si. & Rackwood Ave,
Aviation Noise Programs
Page 17
�:r
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court
Mendota Heights
::::::: ...: .:: ....::::: ..:.: � .:: ..:::::::: .: .::: ...: ..:: ...: ....:;. �,:::.:::; :> ::::. �:: �::::::::::::, ::: .: .: .::::::::::::..:
:..>:. � �:;.
: .,�> �` �;; :: ::3.�:; :? ::: `�:::...::.,,..,. :`
.:<� ��:�a��:":`Yiiiitie::�'::�� .:.::: :.>:;�:;:.:.::,.:.::: ::> :�:::.:.�: :.:�::.:::.::; �; . . . ; :.
,..;,.
. . ..:: � :: :..�::::: ..: �.; . . . .:� .:
: ;::<�
���� ;.;:... >:'�'�'�,,��:.;..:�.T�'.��s:::.;:_:':�.���,;:�'� ;;
0720/9517:30:03 B727 1U2.9 A
07/ZO/9517:33:18 B727 102.6 A
07/OS/9513:14:53 B727 96.8 D
07l30/'95 9:54:17 B737 96.8 D
07/19/'95 9:49:50 DC9 96.7 D
07/OS/9513:24:33 DC9 9E.6 D
07/OZ/95 9:30:09 B737 95S D
07/21/9518:21:16 B727 95.1 D
07/15/9512:04:12 DC9 95.0 D
0729/9516:49:13 B727 95.0 D
RMT #15: Cullon St. & Learington Ave.
Mendota Heights
... . ... .:.:'�:'�..;`:::>s�;�;t.;>;:�::�;:::+;':; ;.:;:.;:.;:;.:;<:::.:::
...�....:: .
: �::�8���: �:
. ><:.:� ,
�, :Tl�::
. :.: ... .;:; ..
. .. :>,:�>.
� � �::Y:�?P:�':::>::
; .::. .:.
,. .. .:.:
:: .;:�.:�. � .:.
..;.: . . . . . . .;:-; . >� .
. ::. . .::. .......: . �.:::<:..:: .::,. ;;.
:: ::..:.
.::::: :
:....
�::«'.
::�>°�:� ��
07/OS/9513:29:05 B727 102.4 D
07/US/'9511:25:57 B727 101.8 D
07/OS/'95 9:41:38 DC9 101.7 D
07/12/95 8:14:07 B737 101.6 D
. 07/04/'95 9:29:16 B727 101.5 D
07/OS/'95 7:1220 B727 101.4 D
07/ZS/95 13:32:07 DC9 100.9 ' D
07/19P95 9:49:15 DC9 995 D
07/�02/95 18:13:46 B727 982 � D
07/Z1/9513:51:43 B727 97.9 D
Page 18 Aviatian Noise Programs
RMT #14: lst S� & McKee S�
Eagan
; ...:::::::::.::: >::.:::::::::.:::.�::::::::::::::.:..:..: ;::.:....:.::;�:: :::..; ;.::::.::::........::.: .: :::::.....:::::..:
: �:>
:�.:::��:::�::`::`.:::::� ::>� �:::�`::>:.::t�:: ::;'. �:,;..;.� �, �': �.
.:
r . ..: �gx : :
�::: :� >�.. .
::: �:� ::.::::: �..::� : �:;; ;#��:: �;
> .:::: ::.::.:::�: �.. �::� .::�. :.. .
>.:... ..
: .:.:: .... ....... . .
� ..;�::�' ; ,,,.��:.:.: ; ... .
07/14/'95 21:25:18 B727 102.4 D
07r16/'9513:50:04 B727 101.7 D
07fO51'9514:36:56 B727 i00.7 A
07�25/9513:26:42 B737 100.2 D
07/19/'95 9:38:38 B727 98.7 D
07�30/95 9:56:58 B727 98.6 D
07/14/95 23:43:55 B727 97.2 A
07/19/'95 9:19:17 DC9 96.8 D
07/15/'95 21:36:27 B727 95.7 D
07/10/9510:04:43 B737 95.5 D
RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
Eagan
.. ::::::::::::':::::::>::�:: .'-: . ...,
...... .. .. :.... ...:. . :::::::::::::: ...: .: :::,._:.;•::. �:: ..: �:::. ;.. :.
..�.. �
. `::;�:<>::::=::;:::;:•;•::::>:•:.:;>::�::�:...,••::
•>:.:�>�' �:' s:'.:.:�..�::.•::,. . ::
�. .
.r._}:..:.;..
.:: �:�'��::�>;�;:<; :; : ��� :
, .�>.::::
.. ��:.��:``:�: �' �
; ..�..
: .:.:.. .
: :..:: ,: .................:::::::.�..: �
: : ,: .;:.:; :..; . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
: ....: .::�
. . . , . :. ..:.;::; .. .: .
; <::��:
::: :...: ;:>.,.� ..::. : : �� : �:
�:.;:::.: >:.:
07IZ6/'9512:01:19 B727 102.7 D
07/19/'9513:38:09 B757 101.9 D �
07/26/9513:40:59 B737 101.6 D
07/l9/'9513:26:59 B727 � 101.4 D
07/10/95 9:39:27 B727 101.1 D
07/15/95 20:29:45 � B737 100.9 D
07/30/95 9:40:50 B727 100.9 D
07i051'95 14:28:41 DC10 100.8 D
07IZSI95 13:38:15 � B727 100.4 D
07l30/95 9:44:31 B727 100.3 D
�
II
' Metrogoliian Air��arts Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft �Noise Events Identified
�
�
RMT #17: $4th St. & 4th Ave. RMT #18: 7Sth St. � 17th Ave.
Btoamington Richfield�
G
,
RMT #19: i6ih Ave. & 84th S�.
Bloamington
U7129/�5 7:12:51
07r24NS 16:02:20
07/26I'�5 6:11.09
07I09t'�5 22:35:42
07i1219S 16:24:15
07l24I9513:16:20
07IZ1/9►5 6:03.45
fi7l281951b:22:53
07lQ4/95 22:56:4U
47l18I9S 16:30:55,
B727 ! �
B727 �I �
B737 � �
B727 �� �
B727 � �
B727 �
B727 I �
B727 , �
DC9 �' �
B727 i �
I��
1Q3.6
103.0
IO2.5
102.3
1Q2.1
102.0
101.7
101.6
10Q.8
100.7
RMT #2Q: 75th S�. & 3rd Ave.
ii
ti7112/95 7:43:24
U7112t9S 16:47:21
p7l24/9S 16:42.42
mn��s a2:ao:o�
071Ib195 22:hG:45
6
07i�2�95 21:31:Q$
47i18/95 16:16:07
Q7IZI/9�5 4:59:38
07i06!'�517:14:33
07l04l9S 21:08:14
Aviation Noise Programs
B727 i
B727 i
�
B727 �
B727 i
B�a�'
B72?'�
B727 �
B�z�,
B727 i
B727,
I
102.2
141,2
99.9
98.9
97.2
97.0
96.2
95.9
9{}.5
9Q.4
�
�
�
�
�
M �,.'
E r�
�
�
Page 1,9
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
Inver Grove Heights
RMT #23: End of Kendon Ave.
Mendota Heights _
Page 20
RMT #22: Anne Marie 'I�ail
Inver Grove Heights
Aviatian Naise Programs
RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
Eagan
(` ♦
Flight Track Base Map
' Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring S
�
�;�
� 9 •
I
tatixan Airparts CommiSSi�
;
�
Aviation Naase Prog�rains :�.eu:" � ' �� �Page 21
•" Y - \4.\'"' � '
t/" ��• ^ � , �
' �
:•t '`�
. � �
� 1 .. . >tti. v►, !
�f
' �� tA ��
. .� �; �
. ,..y yC-i7
- '� e
' G y� �
' r '"� rc�.i. ?..
. !y i�� a�� �.
- :� � -a �.��"1' Q{,�.�4�'+ ,` .
rirY � ,� , . .�f 1�N���o��� M� .
� ,�v,�.�� ��ti-�>.�� �r►`"�"�,'r' �;�,�s
... N `c',������ti, �.'�'.tiA��t 'A
�w�,...��
�
` i'a �.r��'�,�9�{312'�'�,,.�rr�.<-
� `�"T� ����xi'af � f9y
.. .;a`*�'J, �N� ,�,
� � . �� � y �'ti�^' .sF� � r ;i
�;.��?����.. � ' , t.c`i. 'O �s,i ►'EN�:'�I� 5 -
��i�
.�c ��'�� , � ti"��i'i3���lE Y� }-�.
��� �'``',, .�'..���d:��B°3�t,
,1°isbt �� ..}�a��YG�' ��� �
, � ka,tl�,} e � ♦� �!�L'I
�:�'.6�t\a \ • ��y � : � i 1 s
���2'`4. � > � "h; a �\ \ < < � 4
,(� yY
�1'f'�i' G�'��1 a " � t V.�-�a�"�
1��� t�` �? { j Mk � < ��M,� .�� �y��V4,�� '�
�� 1 �,1i ; ' , ; �/ ~ �', ����� .
a � ��
�;�� � � � t : . \.�� , r
�:. ,,, o. �.: ,� � � . , � �. `s , •�
�w� �� .;� � ;, ? , , � �''�. �
�� �2�i' .
�1�� i y��Ey� ` `4
� '•'t� �u� �c ' �
�:.\>�� j�� � Fa�t� �, �. � �t•" i�rt�,��
. i �"i�
"`.� t i�T
� �3.- � u � R�lt N' . ��
� � � . V�� ��- �
�9 � �-s� - y
.; � �
_ ,
�'.�i'hQ�� !��i� �wy �'�'�'�T-�ty�� .�f,j `� '
' p s'.` � �yj� . �'t�'� h+
- ��:2 � j�1�� s ��� i'1 j�p.Y ��2V S M ..
.. �, .. ; ; � /E,rc T ��.J���k`a`r y y� y„v y.- t ..
�,Ys �� � s ��.�Ka .
'yC,�yj� `� �,t111►��h7�wa�,',�is`s �a. >_ � :
.''y '(�j� .:. ,.. ��.. Y+Q��►Y1s��i�� � .. • _ .
p��`�'�. .-. �'�xais�yl�.Yi�. , .
�`���� ����;�2�r�.��.:
� � �.'�.e � ' ,.
�:� � "-�i..'�w •.� . . � . � • Y� �G J�y 4 ^
+, ' ��"�.� �.�, ` M�f .�•�i�� '� '
t
� �,� ' �� `��l�� `� a, � .�, � � �
��{,'~� �,; _�'.��/i��!���l/��`, �4 , �
' K � x j � ru.+�r.�.. > '� :
.1.Y n� , �lr/tl'S4�',c�Cl�� \ . `; i 4, � '
r �.
i, `( �` /�:►�` A ..��.� �
, �� �,,�i ������+��:.� ° �`�.U,...�:. �. ... _. . .:�x..
a^ y "az¢ , x � cA r.'Ct`A. � . � A �1 .+i �t � � `1 � ' ��
Eg �?� e a � � d '�\ : �, 4> , `s � s � '� . o�,� . . .,
�o� %j� �'`^�� a r ? � v � i a + y'' < *�C �yy�, ` �,
l�� i�,�> S`i'o.+r s...�} �c \ "}�, �:. '�,�.� � �t " � r �. } �^ i9�d �` '�
� 3 1: tt\t �s ,.�`" q,{ ' . � �
\'*t� .r � (� ` �. d."\ ` ! +�1L ♦� .. � f � �` '� xl.�r s'yt'/"''.. f
� +ry6,�>�� 1 > ,� '! ' '" > �. , �. `� �+� •; � / a � ` ` ! �• \ �i� . �iY.r��rYM�i
' �c f��t� i;i . - . y � 4 , � Z ; , � .. ♦1� `+ � £�'` �+ ■ ,� ,� � , :�.v 'Y��'�v.q. -�iy ^RY�,
�. T i � y Sy s . � . '•. > >�� ,xY..�i�h. .. a{� �a .. . . � a "° �'� 3'+r''�L''''�+:�ta'�nl
� �' �l; i ; 4. -�i"t � ��.� = � �. -. t '�2hi=� � e�� • 4 i "'ii`i'fi���,�,*tiif�ii
� `,,.�° ' ���Y�ti Y+'` �^� . � �a��li,h�; b � i -. , �"'��C��;
� r � � ��`i►� �„ �y3 �� , }�. 4 . f
s .;" i�i+ , fi+-� ,..- " ' .c4 `�"q�{�t:`- 't: a `o, a
^ • iE �xS -'�h�t Q �' ' �'V + h�`j lr .�.�f Mt �S b , . . i%
� .����sti'i��S's,,�-ya,� �:�, '� '�� a ;�� '•- 4 ,,� ��ri�D� �.; r'a,+�„n `'a
� K fV,T,/i.t��� � � .,,�` � •� � :� rPyL�' �„ (e `
° `��� ���j".�� ,-..'F�'"3�.Sns� .�"`,.:����� , .�-:pf � �4 ��� 1!�''»3 � �'y
� f L�i� *� ♦ r< : ♦ �' ..�t. `t'�` �M«.ii���
-�l � � ..5c 'v �`3� :� � 1I�i �> n� � - t < . o .a �i°� ir 4 I Yr„ aT. .
��. c t"" % 3".r`',n��} ik p�yh a�'�t�.'�+�1'�y'��i�py4�Xr . ' � ��yq t��} N�� �rl��ys'�jt�'i�� . -
�i �, • . _ .: �''w+""�.CiaA d�.+t`;ii..a?�� py,'� �'' .�s. � "�'S�,�f- ic�`� 4 0F � .. ��E
.. .�'�i� t #� .�.3svt�4ia�+lyr� : � _�: ..,�, . ���..r?;'rv�•r�'���s,� S�� <s .,
"....v `{��k���lh}t}�F;." r� ".. ', . . . .. .�N�.v r _'"av�� , • .
..
.::' .
,. .f�.'� ,
..
V✓�..y. � $ � 1 .'"—� . . .-+<• - � o t �
_� .. �,� . . 't � �y��1�,- . ' �j � . . ' .
.<s, � . �(���.� �. . � .^'�w y 3 0
..'4'�r�S`K �` . .1�1 \,'q.� 'YY
��"' "�'1 . %.'? „o t ir+ If' �� �?"�. �ti � 6j �.p�'�'
�-�"�"-_'_*.�'c�s.'��O't < . ,a �g,l� • r .„.,>:?„w, , �' �ft y �J .
��"' � ` � -: jr' .�d'" „, +" %
�n. . �
.
�w, . '. =`L ��,�q
� ..5�c . ,
� ��o-z,Ma-� .-_: , .. '�Z�aw , .
�'-'��/���,�t�` r �.. i�C���-���"*�� � � . :
'�,.�,n ��' '�a,� � ' . • �,.'+'� �.b � w,
�
�!�yi �GS�,\ � . � `� a. a' � , � " .: . �•' -G•.t� _�� „� � fA \� '� ; . .
�'yyy��y��} � .� t ^
�'i�11��,�������,lri.'��t3 � � �41�0! �" ., , . n a� � � � . . . . � ,. .
�Yl�� �. 1 �cl:'�i�:,..r-., _ :.� - - �tji�A��.. _1�uw �a.,.r .,
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
Ju1y 01 to Juiy 31, i995
Noise Monitor Locations
.,. .:.:;:.:"�.;.::.....,., ; :.::::.::+:�:::�:..:: >:::::.,.;:.:�::::>::�::::.:::�::�><;.::::�.�.�:::::::�:�::.;;,:::.,.,. ::::: �::; :::.::::::::.>:::::;: <��� �:::::::::�:::.., :.:::�:::z::�;:�:�.::•: ::::::�.,;;.::�.:�::..;:.:.:.:�::::::;;>r:: >�:�...��:::.::::.:: �::.:��:;:::.::>��:�.
.� r+� :.,: :::: r`'.:.::: .; : : ...::..::�... :: :; •:�� �"::�.:% •.
. .:::. :`� , �: :�:;': :: :::� �.'��:::�. :: :: :....�: �:: •i;::: �:. , .1� .::� '�"::::::::::: ,'`�,.i�;� �Q .�f (} .�+� .+ .
; .:���: �• • :: i'::•iT�. : ,. .;'iL'�I y ; �� .,: , ��. .: i:.::: �T�: :; 'i ;�: `:i? i' 23F:i: , : .:7�!I�' . ; :; :�' i? ; `.�L��it.i: i. iif i�.�:>::i i; I��iii:.`
1 57.3 58.4 65.3 66.9 76S 79.3 67.5 64.6 51.8 49.1 52.7 *
2 57.2 57.9 65.1 61.4 69.9 69.6 49.7 54.7 68.0 69.9 51.9 *
3 55.8 56.9 62.6 61.2 69.0 69.8 45.7 51.6 63.9 67.2 55.6 *
4 61.4 62.8 68.2 64.4 73S 70.8 56.0 57.8 50.9 56.1 54.2 *
$ 59.5 60.7 66.2 67.3 75.7 79.7 68.0 64.7 57.1 58.2 55.8 *
6 * * 48.1 52.0 655 62.1 49.6 * * * * *
'7 49.7 42.8 46.8 50.6 66S 67.1 58.9 53.9 40.6 425 * *
$ 52.7 54.7 56.9 61.7 71.2 73.3 57.0 55.6 40.9 552 44.7 *
9 57.1 59.2 65.7 68.0 77.2 80.0 67.4 65.4 47.0 46.1 482 *
10 54.1 57.3 62S 65.3 74.6 76.3 64.6 58.9 47.1 51.9 53.8 *
11 54.0 56.6 63S 61.0 71.4 70.1 49.9 47.2 40.0 545 44.0 *
12 56.4 59.2 65.6 64.8 75.2 74.6 62.3 61.8 57.0 64.3 49.1 *
13 45.9 49.0 51.4 51.0 * 68.2 55.3 53.3 `* 52.8 58.3 *
14 55.4 � 57.4 68.6 66.9 80.4 81S 67.6 68.9 52.7 612 54.1 *
15 55.9 58.7 65S 63.2 79.4 78.3 65.5 59.3 49.8 55.8 51.3 *
16 57.3 60.7 67S 69.6 79.0 81.5 68.3 66.8 , 51.0 44.0 53.2 *
17 58.6 59.6 65.6 67.4 78.1 81.1 71.1 66.7 49.7 50.2 55.7 *
1$ 58.8 60.0 64.0 69.6 772 80.6 66.7 65.7 54.6 45.7 54/1 *
19 56.7 60.1 662 68.3 76.7 79.8 67S 64.6 61.0 672 56.8 *
2p 57.6 60S 66.6 69S 78S 80.6 68.2 63.0 63.1 70.8 51.7 *
21 61.9 63.0 70.8 69.2 78.8 80.6 65S 63.4 65.3 69.7 66.8 *
22 58.7 60.7 68.0 70.3 78.0 80.3 68.2 63.7 49.9 48.2 50.7 *
23 SSS 59.9 65.8 71.4 77.7 81.0 65.3 65.6 45.9 51.3 50.7 *
24 55.7 59.2 62.1 69.8 77.1 80.2 673 61.4 49.0 54.7 55.0 *
25 57.9 60.0 67.4 682 77.0 79.7 65.8 64.2 44.4 57.8 52.8 *
26 58.6 61.2 65.8 635 71.6 70.7 56.8 51.4 47.7 � 48.1 47.0 *
27 61.1 62.1 69.3 67.6 77.6 78.4 66S 64.8 512 59.1 54.2 *
28 56.2 59.2 63.9 67.9 76.3 79.8 65.1 64.3 45.3 52S 49.9 *
29 54.9 58.1 .642 65.0 73.4 74.2 60.4 58.6 62.0 64.8 43.7 � *
30 55.3 58.8 66.1 66.8 77.9 78.2 60.8 62.3 ' 69.0 71.4 52.8 *
31 59.8 60.3 64.7 71.0 78S 80.4 69.8 67..7 48.3 52.3 54.9 *
Mo. Ldn 59.0 60.4 66S 682 76.1 792 66S 64.7 60S 64.8 55J *�
" Less than lwenty four hours of data aNailable
P� � Aviation Noise i�rograms ,
•i
�
Metropolitan Airports Commissi�
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn �dB(A)
July Ol to July 31,1995
Noise Monitor Locations
1 57.3 64.9 59.9
2 65.8 59.8 68.4
3 63.5 57.7 66.2
4 63.4 59.9 68.4
$ 67.2 67.6 71.1
( 48.7 44.0 *
'7 * 44.8 45S
$ 42.6 465 50.0
9 46.4 58.0 48.5
10 59.6 60.2 61.9
11 61.9 56.8 63.4
12 64.3 61.0 67.3
13 55.3 53.4 56S
14 54.9 68.4 62.2
15 66.2 68.3 65.6
16 52.9 59S 47.9
17 51.7 62.6 55.8
1$ 48.2 66.1 59.3
19 625 61.3 65.1
2Q 58.1 61S 52.9
21 67.1 65.1 68S
22 54.6 64.7 58.4
23 48S 63.9 53.9
24 52.9 * 58.0
25 60.2 61.7 63.7
26 63.9 * 65,0
27 65.3 67.7 66.6
2$ 47.3 68.0 55.4
29 61.9 * 63.6
30 59.6 65.7 60.3
31 57.6 63.2 60.0
Mo. Ldn 61.9 • 68.8 6�.8
# Less lhan twenty four hours of data atai[able
70.4
70.0
69.8
70.1
74.7
59.9
52.3
61.9
69.0
71S
69.9
71.6
67.0
70.0
745
685
68.8
70.7
71.0
68.6
73.0
69.0
67.7
66.6
72.3
73.9
�---
71.6
72.0
72.3
71.0
67.8
�
71.6
65.8
59.2
61.1
44.4
58.8
*
42.8
S1S
65.1
612
47.3
56.3
*
59.7
59.8
57.3
592
62.3
61.6
62.0
59.6
61.4
62.6
62.9
54.0
62.9
57.0
59.3
62S
56S
65.1
�
62.1
*
*
64.1
40.0
34.3
63.1
73.4
68.4
605
*
*
58.2
60.6
71.1
62.7
72.9
70.4
70.4
68.4
73S
*
*
59S
73.9
71.8
71.6
70.3
*
*
71.1
73.3
54.3
60.3
51.1
63.0
*
*
65.6
70.4
68.4
52.1
50.7
46.1
55.6
47.3
67S
61.6
722
71.0
71.8
67.0
75.3
71.1
735
58.6
69.2
67.1
72.6
73.8
61.4
68.7
�
69.7
Aviatian Naise Progratns
56.9
55.6
54.5
46.8
57.4
44.6
48S
44.3
63.1
49.8
50.7
64.3
54.1
61.0
47.3
66.7
56.9
58.2
57.3
53.6
64.8
60.0
57.7
60.8
56.5
58S
69.0
58.0
52.6
55.0
64.3
�
61.3
56.6 * '�
62.0 6U.�
60.2 58.F
59.3 57.E
602 62'
* 48.?
* 49. i
40.9
54S
55.9
57.0
58.0
42.2
52.7
60.8
,45.2
465
535
57.7
54.6
62.6
54.3
55.4
46.7
605
62.3
61.6
50.3
58.1
55.3
51.8
59.1
57.�
55.8
59.
58.6
�
58.9i
�,
57.4
55 �
C
�,
�
60.3
60.8
60.2�
58.1�
56.4
�
�
60.7;
69.8
76.6
74.6
75.3
75.9
*
56.8
51.3
59.7
71.9
71.9
74.2
68.6
64.8
75.8
56.2
61.7
62.$
72.4
57.0
76.2
66.5
56.8
61.3
71.7
75.1
74.4
61.7
73.7
71.2
63.8
7�
71.1
65.4
58.3
65.7
67.7
51.4
58.3
58.1
61.8
62.1
49.0
58.7
52S
66.7
62.8
63.3
65.2
64.4
61.8
62.0
632
49.6
52.6
55.0
63.8
59.3
63.4
58.1
57S
51.9
66.4
G6.9
Page 25
Metropolitan Air�orts Commission • � �
Proposed North Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis �
�
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
July 1995
1.0% (40) Carrier Jet Departures North of Proposed 095° (M)
Corridor Policy Boundary
P� 2 Aviatian Noase Programs :.� �
�. '� i
'� Meiropolitan Airports Cammission
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airpo�rt
' July 1995 �
�
40811.,. Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
33 ... Carrier Jet Departures (0 %) �
Narth af Proposed �9�° (�I} Corridor Foucy Boundar�
_ . f�
�
.� . �.�... ......... .�-..... ;�
: �- >: .. �
_:, . . �, . :�< . . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . , . , :,.
�.t'. ' , � I
• . , . �
. . . �
• ' i .
c,'> � '
... � • e •
•. • ' ; .
. � � ; ,
• ; . _
• : i �
� • • . : , �
• . '
� c,:.� : • . � • • • • :
• t.'::: �. � � • :
• . . .
:" ..., � . : • .
, .... : :
... � � : ' . ' ,
� . • �: ' I
• • �� � �
• . . ' .
.... . . � .
.. • ; 'i .
; i
• . ' .
<��� , . , .
. .. .... , . ' '• �
- . , :# '
� ' �
. ; . �
. . . �
r:_: ; .
. ... ; ; � .
� � .
; , r, •� ;i r, ? .
, � • . � v � .r � . ��: .. • . ' .. . .. r . r .. . i . . v .
I
� .. . . . . . . . •• . • � ' .. • • � . .. ' �
. V
. j
Aviation Noise Programs �� Page 3
Metropolitan Airports Commission �
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
July 1995
0
4080 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
_ 7... Carrier Jet Departure - Early'I�urnout .2%)
(North 5ide Before Three Miles}
s . . .
....> � � • . ., .. . . � iJ ' :f . .. . . , , . , , " , •• „
•
:•'' � i
... •
.... ........... ......................................... '
..... :....r ......................................... •
' • . . •
• . .
. � � .
.... t.. � .
. .. �, : :
0
: '
�
.....
,_ u' . .. . .... . . .. . .... . ... . . .. . .... . . ... . . .. . .. . . ..
.. ,� Y. ;�
• . . ,. , . . ., q . ., .. . .
Page 4 . Aviation Noise Ptograms
�
" il
Metropolitan Airports Commissio�n
I
5outhern Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
July 1995 I
�
- 12.3% (501) Carrier Jet Departures . �--
South of Corridor (South of 29L Localizer);
i� • ' � ;.. ,. i ; ' %��,
, .. • '• �' y :�.;�,
' � ��F��,,' . ��.,i
j`;� '.•�:
.
j :'�.:• ; .
. , . ; �'�
\�+ ` !.. ., :i i .f:, `�`-_....J ..
: •
`` 3 , .__ �, ... ..,�.••_.... ` . \
, ,S ! %
� `! /i.� . ' -...._
l
' 1Jt� ' i � •'._--'' -' j "'j .
`� . � � i ; i
\_ ,, \'Y` , � �� :�
.. ,
:
., , . � i
� ._�-; -._. ....i.
.... � --�-- ..�......--
. , ___ ',� - �
. �_.. .
`�'�,1 t ` ;'t
+ !
�.., , , {
� .;..`i ' I. j
.._ �i i �•� f ~ "* c,. ..__. .��– - --.... .�• -':..••••-•••—
/' �•. • :jj'1`. ```�`\�'•:. )i �
... ; � t � ` �: .,` �\ .��
�j' '.ry- ._..._... ` �..�`. •'e'' • .....~
: , �X�... '; :�
. � � S.'.
•" , .1" ��.�:rws;�,_+i_.
� w. � '6 v ) }�.. �' �!}<
� , .. . • i�:r. •• . ..... _.�r:. �'•'' ,: .r"'Yi. • V.:�y.
......... � \ � � ,- :v'S . ...p-.n=.;.Aw : ;... :.. �`q .
`� �' _ .. ���`7r ":f ��.:� � �,7
. K� ..:'' �'•. :...- �•E�„�
•.•ia>Y-�%`-~
r,.. -'�',�-i��;,c�<
. _1':^=-'•"_�"`:'''.� -i' ,o:, r:� /:;�''•:
.,, . .,r^>�, �....<<� :a'a-o,�.;.
• . ��`.., L.: ,_...,-,. �1�''��•�� . %'"�"•'rf�:�.�e'�';r"'�
.. ..: ��..::<;-..,�"::%Y- .- ..•r'.. � ':�.
.. . : ,� , �. }i ACY,' ,/. .. .'9'e'
. '� �_ ,.r-= ,�:i�� 'lC�e.. � . ��p�•=% �
• . ..K'=• . ..:t": ..•"'y.�:a?.:�:"��'.�tiFd
_ _ _ _ . . '.er.�" n.: ��1`.b�.r.0 !`k._:+....,
%'\. r�:r '..v�' /..:�:,.y3
. .,^"J_ .._cr:.os..•-_ ._ .
. ' ?3.�=i`1`.". . _
1
B
.�
, f...�;,,`•t�, � _•'
... _ • .�J ��
.. -t,
I•–�...
�........_...... i � � I ..
� , i: ../� �� i
.................. % � Ij I
� _ ..��i"�G/�.. � '�
�_ �, y,r � J, .._---}---._--�._._'- , ,.-�_
j r__ / .�,. J,1': •. " :" •. , \
I-J ' � ,' ,\` ``,i� \ • �.
� � ' .�:%� i`��_,�..,: ; ;� i/
I % `• •• � � l\� %'' .f''' `,l i /
' ���/ ' � �:��.� • / ..
''i � "� � `, •:� ' �i ,
� ! � I �r '. r;
�, ., `,},
'i i 4 '� � ii ..�-- ;
1 �i;. / � ,.`'
,, \ f ,f� ' � .` .I't �` ;''
� t�� l i' i � t� i •
a . .:f�``; –^--..i � � i � :;{ ��y
'�`;�r ` .I,, f \\
v-• .� ��"� � q, .�\' j �,, .
t`• � • `i��'�* \ i �:r':
. �, �� �
�'ar ; `\' • � � '�: � j •'F� i
' �.Ha"'� . ,, , `� \`�.� �r%`:y...: �.� � .
�.."Qa�UTs�.... .. `.A . . �`,\c�JC'C�'.. _: i" � � . . "
Aviation Naise Programs
Page 5
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
July 1995
Page 6
4080 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
�.- 427... Carrier Jet Departures (10.G%)
South of Corridor (South of 29L Localizer)
f� . �
�:.. � ... . . . .'��. ����.. .��..... . . . � . . . .���� . .. � .:
r::�.
..� , .
. . .
-� � � .
. . .
.
�::> .
..... . � �
. ,
�-� , .
-. .. �
.. . . . • .
. �
--� : s r� . • . .
... . � ���• • • � , � .
• •
• • •
.. :..- �� •••� • • � • •
.... c:_�• � �� � • � •. •• •
� • •
�+�i • � � �:
� M� � ti • : •
.. ��� � .
y��� • • ! •
. •
, �::� �� ��s . �• •. ' . , �
�.... �• : • . :
... �
� • .,,, �- `.;��. --�... , . ...,; ?,...
Aviatian Noise Programs
:f
�
i
� v �trOpO11f3II l�lIpO17S COlIIII11SS10II
Minneapolis - St. Paul International �iirport
, (
July 1995
4080 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Depa
74 ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early �urnout
(South Side Before Three Miles)
�I
< S ; �
. . . . :�. v .. .. " .. .. . . . • . .
!�. ) .. . . . . � .. . . . . . . r. . .. . . � , � . , ,
Cd,:) '
..... • .
�, �
• ♦ i •
� • . , I
• • • � .
� � � � • •
C�.:] • '
.... �-: �
G"..
. :�
• � .
• •
• �
• • � � • • .
• � �
• � � �
•
• � ` . •
• • • • t � �
• � � .
• • • • • • •
•
•• � �
� • •
• � � •
• . •
}
.. , f•
. . ♦ v � ♦ � v �: � . . .r .. . �
Aviation Naase Programs
Page 7
�
� Metropolitan Airports Commission
Southern Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration �Analysis
f Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
July 1995
I
�
4.0% (164) Carrier Jet Departures S° South of Corridor
(5° South of 29L Localizer)
i
; � �, : i � ,.r ; _ : .
� '. }:':, : i :' : � i
\' f Y r':'' i : t
' � \�r.� ;:' I`:1 : ; . : . . . ';��..;�:. � t i ..---._
�yY� : 3 i � i! .. . � ... ; ;
' `7 j; j j � �� j , ,�.�—.�c:.�.""�"'��—�"^'_
1 � �� i 1 i � ' ��
� i , �::� ,i`: `_, j / .. i �jl % � '.
.' `., � t \ j ' ' , ;; :,; , .'
�(!.�.\ ' .4 \ ; f' •'•t"'.....�• _ -�r,.�•s�;c,i....""""—•-'_.._..�`�
1 �` ` ,. .� j � _..." "7 ; � �+1"r�i �' i ' <J;•\; r' l,�y .�—•-
� ._ ` � ; ? � `• � i' ._,�...... ' f �:
:: � •-. . � �-' �•••••••..._.....•�••••••••—•••••-
�- ;-----._.._--�••••......:..,-i.-•........:�..,�%:�.,_�,' � 3 �
i _ � — \ 'S' : 'i \` Y�`::ZC��` . ? � '�'�
�—.....'- � '-""••'_.. ._ _f.�. % � y� '1 i � �
i ������ �.t '�/i_ _.T_�.��5,,_�.-�.��`` � t, � I�,I 'l;'�
. i � '' ;� ; •. ; : j x ��' ' ? ' �i �! �
t : .:; • ': ; � ' � • _• ••...........� i;` G_
E � �..._j.—•�_--_....�a.� �„l i�-.... I i':
' i ��.'�:>••i....�.._;:.......—t_• .:...........•••^' •••........s. �,_ 14.. —�''---•_�_-
� 1! j `��.. . � �` i �.�.a%: `•••",.. I ♦ � ,
��'� .�-•�--_ � � � �� � /�' ; '��\� � I `�`
i % � � .�./ . .S `t� :� '•.\ :
�.., � � \ i°. � j :li : .� ; '� f
'� t f i . , ,� : ! ;/ '! �� �� `�t /
t ; .�;_ c_'...:.........••••• � '.;r 1 ' � 'i ,
i� ;� ` � ,.. ,�t L� •; • i \ ;, s .
; • � . `j ; '•' - � ; ../ :. � ;` �: t �•.. � �..
•`.' � \ , i:; '�-` _ ; .y, , ; \;.., • ;. ,.
�� �' . �... ` ;.
i f • , —•— --'��:s: / '''t . ; � ��• r
. �• - �T ^ '•— _.__ , �—......: �, i••••••.� ; \.7''r'::.:�' :.� � 1 � � .; � s•. i
a: _ _ r �-- -• � ��•--• f �i� � �� , .. i i� � i M1-="''�
'��`.:. ! • �` ; t i ">. . , .
, ;.
_}a. -,1 ` •. ! �� 1 `:°, �` '� ��' � : iI i ' ' < ,
'•� i ,� �':.'.•,. �;
•- ��' .?.� ' �,.�� � -. _... ' `�'�.� � rw � ., / � I•- :�� %. :
1 ��.....-....-�. _.---:`' - '` • �._••- : r •„'
i � �.� • •,� • r�� ^---••,�: � � � Q ` ';
' � '� ` ,`} `` . \ ,i; '�'}{S•,ta"• � I `{ \ � �':�
. �`' � �`�'�r�. � � .,�`�!'••i iJ i .
fJ. 1 \ : . . ���. ' �^` � : \
.. � V \ 4'a+ \ \, : � tt 'iJ .�!!`,� �����,i � . �� ' �� \�,i-� � •.:
ti i \ y���,p ,� ,if . `�• � '` ~ ^. �t � i
� � ., ,t 'i. '?'•" ' .- • c �' i.:f'�,. �yy' ` •°: `�\ e £;.
, �.y� 'f,-n''�.� .�i•� �C•. ��5�. �. `�.4 `` t. �
� _-F.. ��. ,✓.. ?,s...'. � 2. 4 ` i , �
.✓..�a..�/.�`� � �..Y. t �� kf >, V � .
. _.._..._.... ..�.. ,�.- �,,:� f li; ��.: �5-� �i � �:\
j '' ` �� "1. : . ' �' `. ,
.. `�^.._ = .=-Y ,�+' ` �;.,.��{�;�i,•,�� 3•• v ;3�, ,�,,. `• �;,;�
_ j'•� . ..t:.��s .�, ��'r. •;r: ��1�•'��''�'�€.`,;•�' .:;�t��,�. �,; ```�._....
� ... . ' .:t' 1�!"``'f:.,r;.�'r..,.�v:,,:± Y; �f:����%S. • ^y .�;�� ,.: �.��`... ..�•••'..'�'`�. .
.. :c ,.�C �.' i �% i. �y�y C' /y� ��:�`••':t%! ':,�t,$�° .yp{ �y`,�i��f S•' i• �5 p,. � � � � � Y•I 1 � .
". ...... �•�'• % ' ••r. '..._... ..'• • � x,r • ! ,ih '��.' � �' 7 �� �<� :.aYv� y'.L} � ',�', �� pK?j ��'F �. Q� �. \. � � � �. .. : �S
\ ~ ^~ ; }, -„' `��� �a,K:r:� �� � ,!��j j J�: �i '«.`•^,�i'•4�� ��i h+t� 2�d��.�< ���.y.'t ♦ � . �'�. �.:1�,�
_ \ �.ti..^'" ti.:•""..• ��•'•.:v' + N.• '��rd'/�Y )'� y"� c^'%.�f:. . °`��'4 ,?�����`i�-�j• �+`�S: �,y� :. ��cY 1 ''y; \ 't
.' .�., ....:Y.-:.:--�• ; �. - .r�. .�!;:^.,��: �>• � ;; `�i. �� �t ��y�.--':r ,.:� _ �.:,� � .;
� � f, . � r�� � '�'.::: l . �� • )`� :. . a;\ ., :,vt.. i .
^"` 1"':'.--T %'.>..... f%f.�ii"'y�'�,� �•a i��;��;:, q���;!s ��'\ �� \ .. :,�,�x...
. =y;,,: r' "�y'�•�'.." '� i::;• •Y.'i. `,h,.�;'; . �o�.
t'; �j7�a'�'. /s.u�.� �;� � .i :Gi ��.f• 2. �'�'�.� � �"� ;�' � �......:.
_ - �_�:� •. _ � ��f''..x- � .o`:�: . `.` .K�C�' �, '� t d:�.:2� .� . ,�.,:�"'•'•:,''�."'
� '�r! "' __ y/ 'S�r. • �',.A�o; `�?,' \ -S.`_' I'^.` `.
_ •• ..�. .. :�9.,r'.,y,..ei''��v.•{''� H' �..f"„c�>'sS)s<•' ,l�5"„\`;;'��:E�� �: -� ' ��i,..--��
,���.. _.. '� �.:.;� �. x` ..f.`•.�,'.. ���.;''n �' �. �S, {••} \. .,
�.. �� .�:i 9w'''�,� % �4:I✓. +Sfi.i..1 t �t id;��a��.:� .4,` "I .\��'s \��..�
� i ` Y. �,���.�,�i .. <:•..: '�•, '�'� ` •.
� . --;.�;.. .: -: '=-,,�. -f�=/.s��•_,c ""�..,;�,�,. i.,..;�•:. �:.y� °,, �./ �•-'�- i i �7[� :,'�•:.�''•
Y: '` :.. �_+.2�.. t...�. iS..n� •,�'.- :7%�Iyl,.�.':'�' YVC s �"SY:,��\�,l� A ``�A\�\
\..^ "• ..� ... ��4:(:siE�':'�:�.v 4"`� r' ,��C �i:. `.����.,`,j ,�� ����
•r:3•' �9*- �^+ � r' �'� �,�2�.' l,• �.?i :��� :�' x. \;�•�'
._...... ..:..•�. _ "�': �� � .,:cf'•�!�"'1i.�9:�.� �r••a'` :'�';,",%.:"l,,,,;�, , ...��f:: .�SV�'`.>{�; �,;��; �� . ` �S)/ e� �2`ti. � �� �\; �.
';.. �' '�r.7 '�?��-Yi,'y ,J• a I4i�w" :�` +.! ^ ii•LV r i� `'� �Y'-l. �`.4: %���v�'��. �Y.`t �t �"1�'f� �'� ` �.
.".�� ;r_ .a;. <Y•;�.�i �:- � (� �p� f�e aY.; ��� r : Y `i �, t ,` :�,` ` \ �� i;,�..,\�c.�
^4 •'- ,�;.' �...�r; l��s��'Y:. J�`�.#..°;. 'i ��:�1.i��Cn�';���:�'. '��?�� �lt• yv '-�.
'^ ' >.� Y ` . ....:. / ,•�..;• `::a''".o�� '� " Z. �+.; c . • �'! ' �
� f' �`,����,'�r' •�, y' ��r�'G^ , ' �._..3v�. '¢���_�•y•:%. ::� ,.:yfi� a3 F" �.C�i' � �,i.��i:4'� • T:fj.:�:� �1�%'��i 1�;\ C ' � t•• �
Qii:QQ:'��:. :;�?�3�.,..�..- a� °�-. y ��'/NC.-'' � i•ti��.,.�,`,�� f,,„^'% .;.` • ' .��'
`'• '; "' y.. �.;• " �Y T�'.�',:'' /� ''Y`
.at: �:•^ .t �. /3>.s . i.. J' .d_ 1�f... � .T' r ,�^y•', t ��� `'i�' :£`\ �t c ti� � � �^��• ,�r ``\\
• -,,.%`::::^'r.a�::.•-...... ' ,r• ��Av-. ' ''£��;�juj,! f•c .Cf -�'`i. :��', : .7.
J ,} �,2'� �:.,r-. • � ^7 ,,/ 1=�=i .:1•^� /. C.s-.. , � �T'�',�, �.`•���< �:i' C 1� �v �;�c• �
�. .. ./: • sy.r'� Y:�-/...r�S>'. h�� 4" � ` . .Y'� ���� T,:iYs%� ?'�;`c S��• ?'��4 •\ �t� w\\ •.
'.:i"+f" •);,r c/i: ,C'.. �<<{. „}�'.. r '+ � ' �,�(i' yv;�•� �:`�•` :�...� j . ��
�r.�j!• •:�'•• `_A� ,/ •�-� � \ :•l ::�::s ' �. `� t : t3 ,. . . t��� � ��`• `. \'-
.✓...�...r.:: i�. �� Syr i" .c.ri: .y' I /r� , _ ti�: •. _ . _'.'{•l.�`. : ��`. . �� Z� \. �;';•, s�;�l�' ,.I'�_ : "`..�`'. A`'��� `.
P� 8 Aviatian Naise Programs
c:: �
Metropolitan Airports Commis`si� �
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
�
July 1995
4080 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
2Q ... Carrier Jet Departures (2.2%)
5° South of Corridor (5° South of 29L Localizer)
; .. <
• '.,r� . . • . . .. . . . .. . u. .. . ♦ . . ..
.. J . • t . • . • i � . . . . . . .� . . . !�[ . •• • , . • ,
. ♦
. _ : • • �
•
• � • �
• � . .
♦ . . .
� ' �r .
• �
• • • � �
� •
• � � � ' '
�� • : � � .
• � • � • •:� • • � ;
�• • � . ' •
i• • y � ' .
• �
� y • * :
�� • • � • �• '
��
• �
��i •• • :; :
f � �1 �� h, :
.. . ' .. ti :
I . : . \ ♦ . . �. l • J : I .. .
7
Aviatian Noise Programs
Page 9
4 ^ '.� �
� �� Mebropolitan Airports Commission
. . . .
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airoort
' July i995
4080 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet
74 ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early Turnout
(South Side Before Three Miles) �
,
.° .. ..... ..�....... ... ..�. �1..
t _�, � .. . . . . , . . �� � . . . . , �. , . .. � . . . . . �� . . � . <., ; ,
... . �
:.i'. I
::')
.... C.. . :
C::.?
c� :I
• �
• •
• � •
� � � � • •
• �
• � � .
• �
� • � � •
� • •
• • •• •
• • � •
• • • � � ' � �
• � .
• • • • • •
•
••
• � •
• .
� � ^ ' •
•
.. ,. i.
. . , , , , .. ., y . .. . ,
Page 10 Aviatian Noise Programs
•
J�
�r� Minneapolis / St. Paullnter►cation��Airport
.._.. .......,_.
MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolrtan Airpa�-t Sound Abatement Council
cna.,,,an
xobR+ r. lohn.00
�ce CMirman:
s�a�e�
Teehnicn! Adv'vor.
lohn Fo�a
s���•
r� ��
Air6ome Exprcaa:
s.� eow
AirTmmport Ataoeialion:
P�1 MeGraw
,+cr�:
Choila W. Carry Jc
c;y cfaloo,ni,�qron:
Pe6aoa L«
Vem Wiloox
City ejBiomvf!!e:
J� x�,��.
cn ���,:
� ��a�
cuy grn,K. c,o�eHda�:
n�, i�taaam
c;n ynr�,�wax��gnu:
J� 8mith
Ciry cfMinneapo!'v:
J�a B.9erria
Iohu BkMer
���
Jud11h Dodge
Ciry cfRie!{�eld:
��
n� r�
ciry of sc [,ord, vant:
s�, eaR,..
c��y ysr. pa„t:
s�a a�
c�c.w�a�
G�ol Aom MeG�iro
DeflaAirLi�xtfne_
�� �m
F���:
T� �mdeea�
Fedemf Aviatlon Admt,ri.rnnNon:
Benae Wu�pona
�a cm�,
MACS1�•
Didc Kdnc
MBM:
Robat! Joha�a
Mua6n Nathwvl Afrlint:
IrwrmoeMcGbe '
MetmpoGfan Airywtr conmiiraion
Cov�ai�ima Alba Ga�Qer
MNAbNational Guard:
�rnt.,tt�N�.
No�Nnvut AiNim:
nL,� s.�
7�tra s.y�e
sr. P�cn�e�.�c�,n:
J.ck Barklq
s,�c«�ay,u.�;,,�,:
�e �. c��
urtir�eA;rlu�c,rro.:
A�an Tomliwon
Uidtad Pamr/ Serviee:
r��. no.�o
US.AirForneRuervs:
' cavede ak.m e�pmw
us.s���„w��m�:
ito�: �.�
MetropoGtan Airp�=rts Commission
Declaration � �€' Purpases
1.) Promote public welfare and nafional se�:;,riry; serve public interest, convenience,
and necessity; promote sir navigation and tr�:asportation, international, national, state,
and local, in and thraugh this state; prou.s ;ze the effic'rent, safe, and econa�ical
handling of sir commerce; assure the inclusio. ���f this state in national and intemational
programs of air transportation; and to th�;se ei :=: to develop the full potentialities of the
metropolitan area in this state as an avi�s�ion .•• r�r, and to correlate that area with all
aviatia� facilities in the entire state scs �s t: ::rovide for the most economical and
e£fective use of aeronautic faciliti�s and �.�:vic .,� that area;
2.) Assvre the residents of the metropolitan are ~��� the minimum environmental impact
from air navigation and transportaaaa, and G: :aat end provide for noise abatement,
contral of aitport azea land use. and other protec:ive measures; and
3.) Promote the werall goals of the state's er��ilonn�ental policies and min�mi�p �
public's expasure to noise and safety hazazds az�sand airports.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sounci Abatement Council
Statemeut of P��rpose
This corporatian was formed in furth:eranc�e af t�'�e general welfare of the communities
adjoining 1Vfinneapolis-St Paul Intemato�al ��irport - Wold-Cbamberlain F'�eld, a
public sirport in ths Crnmty of Hennepin, Siate o: ?�nnesota, thraugli the alleviati� of
the prablems created by rhe sam.d of arcrafc :zsing the siiport; through scudy and
evaluation an a co�tinuing basis of the pmi,9p.m �r,.d of suggestia� for the alleviati� of
the same: thraugh initiation, caordinafion �ad �r:�;mo�ian of reasonable and effective
procedures, control and regulations, consis�:::t w�� : fiie safe operation of the airport and
of siraraft using the same: and through �:�s-�.....:��on of infoimation to the affected
cammunities. their �ected residents, an;� de� �ssers of the sirport respecting tt�e
prableu� of ai�raft noise mrisance and i� resp��,�t W suggesdons m�de and scrions
initiated and taloen to alleviate the proble�m. �
Metropolitan Aircrati Sound e�batement Council
Representatia;i
Tl�e membership sUall include representaaves aogointerl by agencies. corporations,
associatioas and gwernmental bodies which by re.ason of their statutary authority and
respoasibility � c.antrol wer tl� sirport, or by raasaa of their status as airport users.
have a direct interest in the operati� of the airparc. Such members will be called User
Representatives aad Public Represeatatives, provi � that die User Representatives and
Public Representatives shall at all times be ecu��r sff numbea:
a �
The Airport 24-hour Noise Hotline u 726-9411.
Complaints to the hotline do not result in changes
in Airport activity, but providcs a public soundiag
board end airport informafioa outlek The hotline
is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday
s
This repart is prepared and printed in house by
Roy Fuhrmann and Traci Erickson
Questions or comments may be directed to:
�fAC - Aviation Naise Program
ATinneapolis / St Paul Inteinational Airport
�G040 28th Avenue South
.iianeapolis, MN 55450
2e1: (612) 725-6331. Fax: (612) 726-5296
e
Metropolitan Airports Commission - Aaiation Noise Programs ��, ,�
�f
y
�Dperaiions and �'amplaint Summcary I
flperatians Summary - All Aircraft ..................................................: i...............,................. l
!VISP August Fleet Mix Percentage ................................................... � � .........................,.....1
AirP' ort Au st Com laint Summ !{ .................................1
8u p a�`Y ...............................................
August Uperat�ons Summary Airport Directors Office ...................� �
- ............................... i
. . . . . `�..
Manneapalzs - St. I'aul International A�rpori Com�laznt Summary 2
;
�
c�m ��� su�m � c� ! ...............2
P a�'Y Y tY .............................................................1...........,.......
�'�wer Lag Regorts 3 � '
�. x�u�� . ........................................................,.........,....,,....,.,...... � .....,.........................3
... ...,.
Nighttime Hours � � ..........................3
.. '
AllOperations 4
. ,
Runway Use Report August 1995 � ..........4
.................................. , ..............t . ,.,................,,
Carrier Jet Operations 5 '
�
Runway Use Report August 1995 ........................................... ..... ...............................5
. . ', '
,
Nighttime - All Operations 6� �
-
Runway Use Report August 1995 ........... �
.....................�.................. . � ..........,....................6
. ` ��
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 7 ' �
Runway Use Report Augvst 1995 .......................................................................................7
Carrier Jet Dperations by Type 8 �
�
Aireraft Identi,�i'er and Descriptio�tTable 9 � -
� i �
Runwuy Ilse�= DuylNight Feriods - All Operations 10
, . ;
� .
DaytimeHoiazSs ..........:.......................».................,..............................:.....:.............:...,.......10
�'ommunity Overflight Analysis Il
Carrier 3'et Operations - All Hours ....................................................: j..............................11
Carrier Jet erations - Ni ttime 11 m- 6 am ..� ..11
� 8h ( P ) ....:...................... ..............................
. -.. � • - Aviati� Naase Progrzms
• a�
�
Remote Monitoring Site Locations l2
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events l3
Count of Arrival A�: craft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13
Carrier Jet Departure �elated Noise Events 14
Count of Departure �.ircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14
Ten Loudest Aircraft 1�'�ise Events Identifzed
Ten Loudest Aircraft 1���ise Events Identified
Ten Loudest Aircraft 1V���ise Events Identified
IS
16
l7
Ten Loudest Aircraft Nr�ise Events Identified 18
z
Ten Loudest Aircraft N�ise Events Identified 19
Ten Loudest Aircraft Nc��se Events Identified 20
,
Flight Track Base Map 21
�
AirportNoise and Opera��'ons Monitoring Systems Flight Tracks 22
Carrier 7et Operations - August 1995 ................................................................................22
Airport Noise and Opera��ns Monitoring System Flight Tracks . 23
Carrier Jet Operations - :�ugust 1995 ................................................................................23
Airport Noise and Operat�vns Monitoring System Flight Tracks 24
Carrier 7et Operations - t�.�gust �1995 ............................................................................... 24
. . i
Analysis of Aircr.aft Noise .�vents - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 25
Analysis of Aircraft Noise �vents - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) � 26
Avi�tion Noise Programs
•� "
Operations and Com� laint Summary
� . August 1�`�5
� Operations Summars All Aircraft
:;.:.� .::::.::::...;:.:.....:::::.:::>::;....::::::�:�::........::.:::,:�.:::::.:�.�::::.:::::;::::::,.,.- ::;,;::;:;.::...:�::'::�::::::::::�:..::...,,:::....::::::.;..:<
;. , ......:::.:.:.:::;:::<.::::::.. .:.:::�� ��.:.,:�..,:: :.::.:.::::::... ._::..::: .:. :� ��:.:: ��: �.<:.::. ..
;.:
:: .:����>.� :::::::. � ��.�r:x��i :>::��:::::�::��. ��iri���ir�:: ::::. ��s::�
�
04 465 1.9% 46
22 277 1.2% 626
11 13968 59.3% 14644
29 8855 37.6% 7889
MSP August Fleet Mi ° �ercentage
Stage 2 59.8% 52.7% 61.0%
Stage 3 40.2% 47.3% 39.0%
Airport August Compl�snt Summary
0.2% !
2.7% �
63.1%'
34.0°Io
53.2%
46.8%�
August Operations Summary - A;°�port Directors Office
- Aviation Na�se Programs � . .
olitan Airports Commissi�
�
...�_ . . •
� = Page 1
Minneapolis - St. Paul Interr�=�tional Airport Complaint Summary' "`
A�.� �;uust 1995
Complais:; Summary by City �,
►�,
;::
Page 2
• •• . :::"`;::i:i.:.,..� ��'�'''>'.:.':.:.:::;:.. ... . . .
i_�' :: .
.:�
............ .....::: ,:
�`1��::. � ���M���::`: `:': :' .t��`: #..?���'�1��`'>:�::,:
...���;::;:.���� ....:�' �.'��:::��:��<.:.;:: :
::............... ..,: . .....::... .
:' .� ::. :, �.;:.. .
. . ...
.::. :. :
.:: : <
... : .
; ... <��: ... ... .: .:.
A le Valle 3 10 13 0.7%
Arden Hills 1 0 1 0.1%
Bloomin on C� 8 8 . 0.4%
Burnsville C' 20 20 1.1%
Ea an 2: 497 522 29.0%
Edina C; 10 10 0.5%
Falcon Hei hts C 1 1 0.1%
Ho kins G 1 1 0.1%
Inver Grove Hei hts � �7 105 5.8%
Lakeville C 1 1 0.1%
Ma lewood 2. ._ 1 3 0.1%
Mendota Hei ts ` 187 192 10.7%
Minnea olis 2E�� 515 775 43.0%
Minnetonka 2 5 0.3%
Oakdale � 13 16 0.8%
Richfield G � 49 53 2.9%
Roseville � 1 2 0.1%
South St. Paul (: 10 10 0.5%
St. Louis Park �' 3 11 O.fz%
St: Paul 4'= 3 46 2.6%
Sunfish Lake C� 2 2 0.1%
Shako C 1 1 0.1%
W. St. Paul � 1 1 0.1%�
Wa zata C. � 1 '� � 1 0.1%
White Bear Lake ? 1 0.1%
:....:::.::.�::.::::::.:�<.::.;:�.:.;:.;:::::::;:;:. :::::::::::......,.....::::. ;::.:;�:::.:... :..............�,:�:............:..:;::. .
... .<.:. .:. ... . .... ...; .. :..:.:: .:.: : ::>�..: r .......:.:..�.
: ....:<:. ..:..::. �:.:.,:.:.:r,::..:�.:..:�::.� :.......:.:.. . <�:.:..::::.::...::.....:..
.. ......::. ...:: .:::. : ��� � . ...::.. .........::::::....::,r ::.:r . � ,. .: : ....::.::.. :. . ,.�. .;:�::; ::
..:.:...:.. ........ ...,......::..... .:... ... � :.:, ::::::.. ....::..:.:.:
.. :... ..: : ..:... ..:. :.... :.;::<;...:> ::: .:..:. .::. �, . .. .:;... ::.�,::.,,,,. :
.::::;;:;;:��:
. ... ..:�` .. .h, .: . .. . ... <: :��::.:::>::::>:>:: :: . ;:r;;.<: ���
. . .... .... b�::::.. : :::.;.:., . .. . ... :.. :.�8��:: �� `:::����:: `��>..:��;
�J C
Time of Day Nature of Complaint
Aviatian Noise Programs • -
Tower �..og Reports
August 1995
Atf Hours
� � �"Q'�.�a:<.;:
�
Nighttime Hours
E
. �
29�'
� - - :�:>:.:... .
����::�'s�:�>����
. �:: ;:�::::��� �
::� ::�
Aviation Na�se Programs ' '
I
olitan Airports Commissi�
�
Page 3
��
All Oper�.tions
�: � � nway Use Repo�~t August
Page 4 Aviation Naise Progcams
Airports Commissia�n
Carrier Jet ��perations
Aviatian Noise Programs
Page 5
5
Nighttime - �.11 Operations
Runway Use �e�ort August �9
�`'�;�:�:.. ��
:::;
>:::�
::: �..�
. > �:�:�::;��>::. `�:::
�k
Page 6 � Aviaaion Naase Programs
i
Metropolitan Airports Commissio�
Nighttime �arrier Jet Operations
� ' � Runway U:�e Report August
Aviatio� Noase Programs
Page 7
�
Carrier Jet Operati����s by �pe
August 199 n
. . . . . - . ? ,`•���...•• �,,:,•.. Ei
''.:>.::�Il'��:`�1;�,`'.>.' <.".:'':'.''��::: .:: ... . � .: ��::�I��:.
....::::::::::::..:.:::.:::�`�?`1� .. . . .:::.::.:..::::.: ::: •::.::;..•::.:::::�..�..�....�..:.:
B727H 219 0.8%
DC9H 1881 7.5%
B707 3 0.0%
B733/4/5 120I 4.8%
B747 18E 0.7%
B74F 8 0.0%
B757 2005 8.0%
8�6� i o.o�o
DA10 14 0.1%
DC10 904 3.6%
DC87 242 0.8%
t
EA32 2362 9.4%
FK10 1232 4.9%
L1011 14 0.1%
NID 11 63 0.3%
IVID80 " 1444 5.8%
BA10 0 0.0%
BAll 2 0.0%
B727 4643 18.5%
B737 538 2.2%
DC8 86 0.3%
DG86 0 � 0.0%
DC9 8033 32.0%
FK28 48 � 0.2%
.......:.......h,....,...:............::.... :.,:::::::,:.:,.::.�.�:.r::.�:::.,:� ..
: ..... ....:.. :.: ... . ..::....... .
..... ...:
: . ..>:.:�;{�:.. -;.: :::::;.:;:: ;. : [� ��(} Q�,
.•���V��::4'.�J`�:;:}•..'�•:� ��1.'•:'::.::��\F:�?�;5�::;::.^:�: � "�?�Ri#l:�•l.�R:�:;:;•:::.:;
•;',+.}.;�;;��:`•`;:•�;;•`:: S
Page 8 Aviatian�Noise Programsr . .
46.8% Stage III
!J
53.2% Stage II
9
0
�
. ;
Me�opoiican �irpO�ts commiss�o�
Aircraft Identifier and � .iescriptionTable ; I
:�a���:�����.
�
8�2�
B727H
B707
B733
B737
B73S
B747
B74F
B757
B767
BAIl
BEC
BEl
BE80
BE99
CNA
DC10
DC8
DC8S
DC86
DC87
DC9
EA32
FK10
FK28
FK27
L1011
IvIDll
NID80
SW3
SW4
SF34
BG u'�TG 727
BOEING '' - HLTSH KTT
BG .�TG 707
BO� ;r 737-300
BC; �vG 737
BOEING . �7 200 SERIES
BG::_�TG 747
BOEING " ? FRIIGHTIIt
BO��.=NG 757
BOI�: ��TG 767
BRTITSH A: ROSPA(� 111
B�IC� �- T (ALL SERIFS)
BEE(�i�.:.�FT 1900
BEEQiQ? `. � T KING AIIt °
BEE(�iQL•=�.='T QUEEIV AIIt
CESSNA :.�LL SERIFS)
MCDONNII..I. DOUG7 AS DC10
MCDONNELt. DOUGLAS BC8
+ MC�ONNELL DCi�: GLAS DC8 STRETQi
Mcvortrr�[.L nc::�.,As �c8 6o-S�s
MCDONNELL DOU: ''.AS DC8 70-SIItIF.S RE
MC�ONNEL ... DOUGLAS DC9
AIRBUS II� : � JSTRIES A320
FO� �IIt 100
FOz� ::IIt F28
_ FOI�L: r27 (PROP)
I.00Ki�.s ;"RISTAR L1011
� '
MGC'DONNII,.. JOUGI.AS DCII
MCDONNELL D0� :GI,AS DC9 80-SIItIFS
SWEARINGE?'S METROLIlVER 3
SWFARINGE?�: METROLINER4 ,
SA. �,B 340
Aviati� Noise Pro�?rams •
1
Page 9
Runway Use - Day/1�:� �;�ht Periods - All Operations
Minneapolis - St. Paul I�:� :�rnational Airport August 1995
��,• ;-• iime Hours
1�T5�;��ttime Hours
Page 10 Aviation Noi;ie 3'rograms •:�•
Community Uverflight Ar���lysis
Minneapolis - St. Faul International Air� =�vrt August
i�
Metropolitau Airgorts Commissia�n
��
Jet Operations - All Hat: :-s
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime t_Ilpm - 6 am}
Aviation Noise Programs
995
�$
� Remote Monitoring Site Locations
Airport Nois� and Operations Monitoring System
R � I' ? �:. ^
Page 12 Aviation Noise Programs �
�
�
• ,
Metrap
�
Carrier �iet Arrival Related Noise _�,vents'
August 1995
13
14
15
I6
1?
1$
19
20
21
22
23
�4
Caunt af �rrival Aircraft Naise Events for Each RMT
Minneapolis
Iv�Gnneapolis
Minneapolis
DTnneapolis
Minneapotis
l��inneapalis
Richfield
Minneapolis
S�. Paul
s� Pau1
S� Paul
Mezzdota Heigh#s
��
Mendota Heights
��
BloomingGon
Richfield
Bloomington
Richfieid
Inver Grove �ieights
Inver Grave Heights
Men�iota Heights
Eagan
Xences Avenue & 4lst Street
Fremant Avenue�& 43rd Street
W Elmwood Street & Helmc�nt Aveuue
Oaklaad Aveni�e � 49th Street
12th Avenue & SBth Sfieet
25th Aven�e & 57th Stc�et
Wentworth Ave & 64th Street
Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street
Sara#aga Si�eet & �Iartford Aveneie
�e
Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street
Finn Street & Sch:�ffer Avenue
Sautheast ead of Mdiicau Ca�t
First Strset & MrfKee Street
Cullen SGrcet & Lexingtan Avenue
Avalr,� Avenue & V'�las Lane
84th Street & 4th Aveaue
75th Street & lith Avenue
16th Avenue � 84th Strcet
75th Street 8c 3rd Avenue
Bazbara Avenue & 67th Street
Anne Marie Trail
End of Kendon Avemke
xe
{�a�ei Laae & Wren Lane
* Site 12 is curc�c:ntty being z�Iocated � to city street im�aveuieats.
Aviation Noise Programs
4006
i77$
3276
289'7
3739
3312
268
198
$3
&8
50
b2
360:
234....
271.=�
} ��.�.
15..
52�
�r.
ia.:'
1?:'.`�
1�� �'
1£�_=7
� 77
� �47
r---Lp
; 1V05
i 1005
27b3
2891
53
42
30
45
21
19
179
58
I920
60
73
24
9
27
16
83
106
1�.iz�arts Commissicxi
1
3
12
27
603
836
4
1
b
7
0
3
11
5
2�r
2
4
3
3
0
6
14
7
Page 13
Carrier �:=et Departure Related l�oise Events
August 1995
Co�mt ::+ Departure Aircraft Noise Events fc��• Each RMT
; ��� �.:: ::;;::;:.:;:::::� ........ ....: ...:..:.::...::.:.........::.:.. .:::.:..:.::�:..::..�::..:::.::::::......:......: :...:...........:...: ... „..... ...::.. .
. �.
. .:; .��:: `:::.:::� :'�. :�:.;:::.:�..::;`:�� ��� :::,.:::..::.:.:<.:.�..::.;�:� :..::..::.:::::::�`:<��::>;:::��:::.;:'::;:;::�:< ;���s �:
:: �� � � .. . .; ::� . . . . . :. .:.: .:::..: . �. ::: :: .�x�..n...:�::, , ._..�.�'.���:�. ; . ,�i � t�:;:`:
:. ; .. : �: . : .: : : :.;. .: . : .: . .: : .. . : : .:: : . : ::: : .
:.::..:.:.:.:.�:.,.... �:::�� :; :::: � �.:::� <��� ;:;::: .:;: ::; .�. :....����:��::���t��<::> :: ...:;�... . :..; . :: :: ...:...:::...:::: :.:;::.> :: ::::�:,:�..,,:::..;.. > : ..�: ..� . �� �::::
:; . . . . . :: :: .:. :,..,.....:.�;. .: { :: .�::: �� �� ::::::: . :.:.::::::;.::>>::; :::.:::;.::.. .::::.:..: :.::.:.:::�::::. :: ; .._ ... . <. :: >�.<:<. �, <:::.:: :: ::, :. . .:; .:: ; ..;�:.� � a :
�:�:. . �:; <� �:� . ::.. .,; .�f�.�� ; ;:;:�#�.�:;:;: :: ..��d�: ; ::�l�sf��.�::::
� 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 2?�i , 88 0 0
2 . Minneapolis Fremont Avenue•& 43rd Str�eet 268 123 5 0
3 Mumeapolis l�. �.?Imwood Street 8c Belmaat Avenue 1055 392 62 0
�
4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Sbreet 1346 703 130 11
5 M'inneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th St�eet 2872 1431 785 206
6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 3053 1643 854 403
7 Richfield "JVentwarth Ave & 64di Street 1528 305 81 5
8 Minneapolis ".:xigfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 891 127 32 3 i
9 � St. Paul :� ;: atoga Street & Harlford Avenue 81 32 0 0 i
10 St. Paul ;:sca Avenue & Bowdoin Stre�t 98 61 1 0
11 S� Paul ='• r.�n Street �& Sche,ffer Aveuue 62 14 3 1
� � �':>.>::::
::>�;�:::
�.
":;�;:'::':::"� �:::: ::.
., .......................:......:.� ..
::.;. ..::...... .;�...: :... �
: �;: ...;_ : ... .,::. : .:::: . �.; � ��
..... .....
.. :....:. :::
. : .: : .:. .... : � ..
,:,;: .
�:::::> :. •.::: ::::.,:;;�.:>���>::.:.,::::��:::::;:::::;: . . ... . .... . ... :. :.:..:: . . ... . . . . . . . ::::..
. . :: : .. . . .:,;:; . � . : ; : < .::;: .::>:;.: ::� <:>: . ::::.:.::....:�:� . :: :::::::: � . �
.:� ::: . . . . .:. ..
. .: .:.�:�:�:�>:>:� ��:: ::;>:::::::�,:::::�::..:�::::::::::::;:: ����:::::��: .:::::�:»>
:>:::::. :::..:�2: �::;� :::: .::::.;�:: �:�.:��..�t. .:::..: �.;:: :::.:�.._�:;�:�:�t��::�r�:: �<:>:.:::�:::> :::::::::.:::;«.;:::<:.;::« :. ..�:.�.�:: ..:::._:.�: .:::.: ..:. .::::. :.. ...:.:::
i: :...:.:: .:::: . .: .. . . .:..:.� ....,......: :
13 Mendota Heights �n�=.heast end of Mohican Crnut 511 327 47 1
14 Eagan �<rst Stroet & McKee Street 2860 730 166 3
15 Mendota Heights CL:S�:�:� St�eet � Leacingtoa Avenue 2302 508 98 2
16 Fagan :�ealoa Aveniae 8c V'ilas Lane 3406 1561 SOf 11
17 Bloomington ,:�4th Street & 4th Avenue '' 177 69 11 0
18 Richfield ':�th S�+eet & 17� Avenue 344 130 64 12
19 Bloomington ti�th Avenue 8c 84th Street 299 78 46 6
20 Richfield �� �th Straet & 3rd Avenue � 218 23 11 1
. 21 Inver Crrove Heights Bv�aza Avenue & 67th St�+eet 862 176 0 0
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1236 117 0 0
23 Men:dota Heights ::.zd of Kendon Avemre 3904 1994 919 36
24 Eagan C:: .pel La�e & Wren Lane 589 289 105 1
* Site 12 is currendy lieing relocated dne €;s city s�t improvements.
Page 14 Aviation Noise Programs
0
0
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noi� y Events I
RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S�
Minneapolis
............ . ,.:,:>;.:�.:�>�..:;:�..::�.::;:�.��.:�.:..;;
; :..: �.::..;. ..:............::..::...::.::; �::::;:.:. ::�.;..>.;�.>::;:.;::;:
.: :. ........... .
: ::. .. .
:>: ::;:.;> :::..::....::::.;::,::::.:.::::::. ::::. �:::::�:�::?�:.;:.... ...............:.:::.: .:::..:
:>:<�::.�. ...>:�.�:�t�r.�.�.�..�.�.;. �.... .::�:: ::��:>:::��:::.:;::�.<:; .>::..,.,;._;;:<:;:::<.: �:::�<. ;;�>:��;;;
. . T�::. �:;;:::;�+�:. ::
08/04/9515:13:54 B727 90.6 A
08/l8/�516:02:13 B727 88.7 D
08/12/9512:2�:26 DC9 88.6 D
08/04/9515:29:28 B737 88.1 A
08/14/95 20:00:41 B727 .88.1 D
08/08/9511:02:17 B737 87.8 A
08/�OS/9519:45:13 DC9 87.6 A
08/18/'9512:46:54 DC9 87S A
08/20/9515:56:28 B727 87.0 D
08R0/9511:10:42 B757 86.7 D
RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
Minneapolis '
:::............:...................................... .
: .... .:.,:. .........:
: �� ::: . : ..::, :..:.: .. . :..: »{:...:.:.
.:. ..: .... . ...... .:::::. :: ::.::::::;:.. .
<.t::.
; t >; �. �.>..>>:: ; . .' :', . � � �:
:::.. ..:. .:.. . ...... ::::
:.r_.�:�:. :' :::::...
::.::��"<;`.::`�� .
..�..
.'�iiu���<<::.
:.:..::... ... :.
::.:. .:: ::.... .
..... ;:�
...::::
::::.. :. .... :
:.: :.. . .:. ...:::.. :......... .::::
:�.:...::.:;.....:.:..r
`::.�:;�<:.:;
;:;;:�:
:. ..: ..:::...... . :....::.;: ....
::�'�'�>.'>:,..
:..�a�l'�:«;:>
:...:... :: ::>:::. .:.......:..�
. .:.�.:::�:
,:: :.._. .;:.;::::-;. �:.::. .,..,;:.::�.::..:..:. :: � �:.<.:::.::::.:
08/n6/9514:20:17 B727 100.3 A
08/03/9516:59:34 B727 995 D
08/10I95 7:19:03 B727 99S D
08f03/'95 9:44:52 DC9 98.8 D
08Ib9/9510:07:18 B727 98.7 D
08fa8/'9516:25:38 B727 � 98S � A
08Ib9/9519:56:26 B727 97.7 D
08/�03/'95 13:26:15 B727 97S . D
08/09/'95 7:12:43 B727 97S D
08/12/'9512:32:02 B727 975 D
Airports Commission
RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
i�
Minneapoli s
i .
. � .: �� .`.;:?��:; ;::> :: .�:�:�
��::7E��f�:'�aa�:<�:::::>::. ::: ,::�.::::.;::::�::::::��..::<:::::.
:. � :::::.::.: ::.:..::,::.��.:. ��<.;..:; ���`�',��; ::.:;<::��
:.. : :. :.. : : : . : : : ::.: . .. . : : . . . . . . . . . : : : :.: .:. :.: : : : : : :.:: ;:::.;: : ;:.:: .;;:..: : ;: :.: .
r�wrwr�rrrrri ......... :.::
ti8/12/'95 12:24:18 B727 � I 98.5
+.i8/10/95 9:35:34 B727;I 97'8
08R1/95 9:45:35 B727 , I 95.5
U$/31/95 1(�:15:16 B727 i� 92.2
08/11/'95 1.;:03:37 B727 �'I � 91.6
08/'24/95 1:::03:04 B727 i I 91.1
08/03/95:�:12:00 B737,� 90.8
08/19/95 i�:05:33 DC9 �� I 90.7
08/12�'95:s):28:22 B727�i 90.0
08/11/95 ;�:55:54 B747 i 1 89•8
il
I
R14RT #4: Oakland Ade. & 49th St.
!I
Minneapolis �
, I�
����.<:::;;:..
:,z_
::: .<. ;. .� ., :;` :: � <
�
.�3 .���:;..:.
... ::>�::
08l24tA5 14:52:16
08/C' : r9511:25:29
08i : �/95 9:43:13
08121/95 9:34:10
08C11/95 21:07:05
osro3�s 9ss:3s
08/19/9517:05:05
08l31/9510:06:31
08I�09/'95 8:57:58
tiSf03/9517:03:59
Aviation Noise Pro;: �ms
B727 � 1 1025
�
B727 j I 101.9
B727 ; � 101.6
8�2� �, l 1�1.5
B727 �, 101.0
B727 � I 100.8
Bn�; � ioo.�
B727 , � 100.4
B727 � 100.4
B727, � 100.1
Page 15
�;.
Ten Loudest Airc�•:�sft Noise Events Identified
RMT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th S�
Minneapolis
. :::<«<:�til����''::• ;."''�:`
• •->.<•:;•:
:.:...
:;. ; .
.....� .. .
08/19/9513:25:01
08/11/'95 9:09:48
08/31/9513:20:53
08/10/'95 9:59:13
osno�s zo:so:s2
08/12/95 11:07:18
osn2�s Zo:ao:ss
08/12/9512:29:22
082.1/95 17:23:08
08/10/95 09:46:20
B727
B727
B727
B727
B�a�
B727
8�2�
B727
B737
B727
108.3
107.�
107.�
107.�
107. ;
107.3
107. .�
�07.�.
�p6,,.
106.t,
D
L'
D
r•
rl
II
LZ
D
D
D
RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. �: 64 r;, S�
Richfield
... � �.,�:'
:. �:;; �: i : :: {: ::' � � �,.:: � � �' � : : �
..�:;�`:::`.
::.:.�`;`:�"`�'�:.
���.
�".,i�i�:�"��<:�:`'`����:�.�: �
=`�:���:::>:
>'.:�'.���; �:
�,��:;.;>� :
08/19/'95 8:24:53 B727 101.6 D
08/14/9512:10:16 B727 101.1 D
08/10/'9513:12:27 B727 100.6 D
08l31/9513:12:43 B727 100.3 D
08/19/'95 9:34:41 DC9 100.2 D
08/19/9513:16:15 B727 99.8 l�!
08/19195 9:14:39 DC9 99.6 ° I)
08/Zl/9513:10:29 � B727 99.6 B
08/10/9518:37:19 B727 99S � D
08/n9/9513:27:26 B727 99.4 D
Page 16
Aviation Nois� Programs
RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th St.
Minneapolis
::: .;:: ..: � :::: ..: .:: .: ..::::. �.;::: �:::.,_:;:...:.::: .. �:: ., ,.:::::;;:::;�:;:::�::::::: ::. �:::;:::�;:;� .:...::..:: ,: .....:: .: .:.:;:: .::.:
:••.:::::::::::;;:�'::'•::::<:��:•:: ::::��';:f��:::.;:;`:':':.::��:�:::;::::>: :;:::..:.;:::.. `'
`•.:�%,�,��,�,,,t:�`E��> '�' :::::::'�';i��:::�::>
= ::;: �:: :: : :e ``::� � :: .... :: >:�::: :.; � : � :::
. ``:::> �::::�::�.,��. �.. : : :: .
:::: .:�>:�::::::: .
:; .. ::.
.;>�� :::.;:.:� :::.:::.:..: .. :: :� :
�� .::.�<:� �>�>>::>::,:.:. :.. .:.
.:.:
....
...................................................... ..................... ...................... .......:. :..:..:...:.
08/10/'95 21:28:45 DC9 1102 D
08/Zl/95 9:33:50 B727 109.8 D
08/21/'9513:33:53 DC10 109.5 D
08l20/'9513:35:11 DC9 109.1 D
08/10/9518:09:38 DC9 109.0 D
08J19/'9513:14:44 B727 108.9 D
08/10/95 7:18:17 B727 108.8 D
08/10/95 9:34:44 B727 108.7 D
08/12/9512:23:11 B727 108.7 D
08/12/9512:30:49 B727 108.1 D
RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
Minneapolis
�
..f.: .. . .. :.,:�:::«:�: �::�.: �:>::.:::::::>.;, ::•;:::<�;<:�:::::..,...:.....::.;:;;;:;:::;:�::>;: >.:::, .:.::.....::.:::::
::.:�>,�.�.v;.::...
.:.:::.:.:.::.. .
, �..�::,;r.:: ;:
;<::��t:: `�::�::�,,::;..;. :::.......::.:
>:�.
>:�';::::``<.
:::>�:��:::<:
. :.. ...
.:>:
. .<:«:::: �
<:;.,::::��?�'>::: :'
>�:�`::>::
: . ...
. ::.�::
: . . . :.. � . : : <: : .,.: . .: : .: ..: .: ;; � �.;: . .
: .:..;�..:::::.. � �:�,: . . .<.
. . � :::`; `:
�
08/06I95 21:03:13 B727 102.9 D
08/30/'95 3:07:04 B737 101.3 D
08IZ1/9513:34:17 B727 101.1 D
08/1OP9518:10:05 B727 99.9 D
OS/30/9517:04:33 B727 98.5 � D
08/09/9514:15:29 B727 98.3 D
08!'l0/'95 i8:51:50 B737 98.1 D
08ROI'9518:19:36 B727 98.0 D
08I28/9517:09:40 B727 97.8 . D
08/03/9513:28:05 DC9 97.6 D
il' ' I
' Metropolitan Airports Commission
.
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #9: Saratoga S� & Hartford Ave. RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
I
St. Paul St Paul I
� �: :' ����<�> :':: '�::�::. ::::. .`':::<:;,,:°.:::' .
���� �:��::'�`.�uuir:�:: :�:� '��::
:;:
.:.
.......... ::::::;;:.:;:.:.:.. :::::�:<:.:::>:.;:�::::::�::::::�� ,
.... ..... :.....: ::: :: �� . e:: :: :: :: ��. . . ::. ; :::.:.....?,:... : ,_
.;. ;:., .:.
.:.. .::. .:.:�3E� :: :.:. .:::.:::.::.�� :::;. :.. : _
. . ... .
:. : : : : : : : : : :. : ::. : : :.: : : : :.: : : . : . . : : :.: : : : : : : : : : : : :. .;: . : ::.:; : : :.;: : . : . : :.: : : :.: : : : : : : : : .; : : � : : : :. : :.: : : : : ::.. :.: . . . .
�s
08/Z3/9515:48:37 B727 97.8 A
08/30/9512:46:35 B727 91.4 A
. .;
08/30/9512:55:07 B727 90.9 A
08/15/9512:32:53 B737 90.7 A
08i08/95 5:41:10 DC8 90.4 A
.08/03/'951:48:01 B727 90.2 A
08/l3/9516:15:39 DC9 89.8 A
08r24/95 9:27:52 B727 89.7 D
08/�U3/9511:13:50 B737 89.3 A
08/06/95 8:40:09 B727 87.8 A_
RMT #ll: Finn S� & Scheffer Ave.
St. Paul _
:���:.}�:;:�<::
':��::�a�e�:<::.;
.:.+���. .>
' �`:�:;':"::, ::�;:;��;:>:.:.�::::>::;:�::::
'.�>: �
:::;e�3r.:::.�:�
� �:��:e�; :
:<.�
e.
: ... .::
>:>::;:: �.
: �:; ::.. .:. .:::..:::.;::.::..�:::�.
: . . .::: .. :,.. .::;: .:
..�.. .
.::..:...:
.:«.>::
.:::
: ::. . .;»�.:.. :;.::� :.:: ::::....:::. .
... ...
: :: �.�
08/12/95 10:42:37 DC9 101.7 � D
08/04/'9515:06:55 B727 98.1 ��
08/+02/9512:59:48 B737 94.9 �
08IO2/9513:01:48 DC8 91.1 �
08In3/9511:07:22 DC9 90.4 A
08/30/95 3:08:49 B737 89.7 D
08f06/95 6:55:38 B727 89.3 D
08/18/9513:25:48 DC9 89.1 D
08/18/9513:21:36 B727 88.6 D
08/2A�/95 9:28:47 B737 85.1 D
.:. :. . :.; . :. .:
.. ... . . � � :>:��:��:: � �
.:: ..; ..
:.;. . ; : ,...:: :..:�:..:.:::::;. ,; . .
,:. ...:�.. .:.:.�...:: :..>;...:� � ��:� ;; .;:::...;:::
.: :. . .
08l10/9511:10:42 B727 ', , 99.0 D.
08/30/95 4:27:13 DC10 j I 96.0 A
08/08/95 5:41:49 DC8 '; i 95.5 A
08f08/'95 23:58:01 B727 I� 95.3 A
08/03/�S 1:48:39 B727 93.6 A
08f07/'95 23:10:51 B727 �' 93.4 A
08/09/95 0:09:54 B727 �� 93.1 A
08fU7P95 22:45:45 B727 I 93.0 A.
08/0.4/'95 15:08:36 FK10 � � 89.9 A
08/03/�5 3:50:26 : B727 �, 89.5 A
�
RMT #12: Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
S� Paul I
; �
Aviation No�se Programs I I p� 17
�
Ten Loudest Aircraft lrTcR�se Events Identified
RMT #13: Southeast End oi Mohican Court
Mendota Heights
s .::::,� :::.........:::::.::.:..::::.::::::::::.::::... .:....:::.:.::.:�::::..:.:. ...::::::::::.::.,:.:::::..:,.::.;:.,,::.,
. .. ..�:1��::�;:>:; :.•;• :•••:�:;>'.•. :;
j'�� cy�! :� <:': >�G>�::>. : . . .
'. .:37"is..::.�il::i�$�'; .:..:::
.. � . .. ;.,Ar,. .. . :.�;y•:.:y:�. �i%';':•;' ..�;..�`. ''`` ::A�::
. .:.J•� �:
08/Z9/'9511:39:03 DC9 100.1 D
08/ZS/9513:26:21 B727 99S D
08/L8/9514:14:42 B737 97.7 D
OS/06/'95 9:32:41 B737 97.1 D
OS/15/95 18:19:07 B737 97.1 D
08r281'95 9:42:27 B727 96.3 D
08/17/'9511:40:56 B727 96.4 D
08I06/'9511:39:51 DC9 96.0 D
08f02/95 9:48:26 DC9 95S D
08/13/'9511:35:36 B727 95S D
RMT #15: Cullon St. & Leadngton Ave.
Mendota Heights _
Page 18 Aviation Noise Programs
�
RMT #14: lst St & McKee S�
. Eagan
...':i'.`..i:':'K:w.:':. i': .%�' ::'....::::'::�L{;If:.. ::jt;i:.
... :� �. :� i I�,� s,,�, t
.... � .. ..... � :. : ..: : .: .[.
.. ... ...: .: . ...:......: ::�{ ::#:Y.�Ek:: •.::'�:. <iiL.V�L�::::::[�: ':'
3/l8/'9518:03:47 B727 100.4 D
�/31/'95 21:02:35 B727 100.2 D
.ir21I9513:45:21 B727 100.1 D
.?8/30I'9519:57:54 B727 99.8 D
��8/15/95 8:02:06 B727 99.7 D
";8/17/9518:39:40 B727 99.6 D
�;8/16/'95 7:13:38 B727 98.2 D
r,?/18/9513:07:47 B727 97.8 D
:::'Ol/'9513:56:00 B727 95.7 D
�:: :-16I'95 13:56:02 B737 95.5 D
i2MT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
Eagan
:.....::.............................................. ...................
;:;::::>;�:>::>>� ..
�:.��:: �«:�:.:::::;.;�:.:<>:::
::::<;:::..���
::..:;>::>:><:... .. �:::�i�::�::�:� :;���::::��t:: :�:><::':::::�:: �.::���� �.:.=:.:::
.:.:.:..:.. .
��i�:':i��;:.<:�;��,,'::.���:�
.�:.�:;::::� ��
<:::�:::>::::
. .:.:.�:...
.: ..::::...
. .:.._::
: .::.:::.:: ......:::.::.: . ...............
...............:..:
: ....:::.>.. . .:::.:. . .:::::..:.:: :..
: ...:.. .::. ..... .. ��
�<::::.'�:<:::� �� ..
0&; ! 3/9517:55:16 DC8 102.7 A
O8 � �'�513:28:47 DC9 101.9 D
08 °•? 15:39:54 B727 101.6 D
08; :==5 10:30:56 B727 101.4 D
08/ -+� .y 13:36:35 B737 101.1 D
08/: i�%i 13:23:31 B727 100.9 D
08r �.�95 8:07:09 B727 100.9 D
08/1;;:"�512:00:42 B727 100.8 D
08/15;�513:45:52 DC10 100.4 D
08f02/9513:24:04 DC8 100.3 D
�
Ten Loudest Aircraf't Naise E� ��nts I
RMT #17: $4th St. & 4th Ave.
Bloomington
RMT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St.
Bloomingtan
i�
rlitan Airports Commission
I� �_
�2MT #18: 7Sth St. & 17th Ave.
Richfield, �
081� 9S 11:05:58
08/s':�95 9:19:(18
Q8h: � /9S 7:16;53
08fL'-:.�95 i1:11:38
48/4;,'�5 22.22:48
08/��f9S 21:06;39
08/I:'•;95 20:15.28
081t�''195 8:5b:47
08/Q3Ig5 13:45;14
0$/C�/'9513:OS:C15 .
B72? i iO3.6
B727 �.', 103.0
B727 i , 1025
B727 ; 102.3
DC9 �' 1Q2.1
B727 � � 102.0
B727 I 101.7
B72'T � , 101.6
B72? � lIX?.$
B727 ! 100.7
I
�
I�;MT #20: 7Sth SG & 3rd Ave.
Richfield
f .
081�3/951I:06: i6
08112/}5 9:21;10
08/03/95 21:43:02
08/12/9510:37;U7
081�6195 20:29;57
G$f09l95 22.28:OQ
0$/12/5�5 9:19:31
OSJ11/95 8:46:57
(}�/0319512.�b:19
0$/121'9S 21:18:14
Aviation Noise Frograms
B72'7 � 100.2
DC9 �' 95.1
B727 . � , 94.3
B727I' 9�4.0
I?C'�1 � , 93.5
B72? � 93.1
B727 ; 92.9
DC9 I 92.4
I}C9 , �f}.5
DCV9 I 9U.4
Page 19
Ten Loudest �: �.��craft Noise Events Identified
RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th �- f.
Inver Grove Heights
:.....:.>: ::::::::.:....::.:.::.::::.;:;.:....._:..:::.:. ::.::::::::::.:.:::::.:.:�::;.::::..:.::. .;_, ::.
� '':' :'• �:`�:: ::: ::. {�
.....,. .,
{�q��.+ > :' �::::���,s . . . ... ....... . .
:':c�, ::�::::':•':l�:i;i::<`'•:.:: :?i:::`��'•:::::::.::;:;.:..::?.;:::::r:::>>'•<'<':�>:.i::..�::=:r•. -:%3;F+. :':
.... ;:��"'..:::: i�.Pr,. ...
:; `
•:.. . ... : :•.
: . �. � • . ....,- .. ... • • ::::: ':
. • : .;.:.. , .:. ;:: •; :'+;: :; •:';; �: . �,�.'.;;;:;; :;; • :;,::.•>:`: •..; ...' �;: ;:.' �.:.
...................................................... ..................... ............... . . . .... .........
08/.11/95 22:02:52 B747 89.8 �� �
08/08/95 21:44:29 B727 89S ��
08/25/95 4:23:41 B727 87.6 J
08/29P9519:11:11 B747 87.6 :a
08/17/9519:16:55 B727 87S !7
08f02/95 7:15:17 B727 87.4 J
08f05/'95 7:34:37 B727 87.3 U
08I23I95 7:17:44 B727 87.1 J
08r24/'95 9:30:38 B727 87.1 D
08/31/9513:59:26 DC9 87.0 �
RMT #23: End of Kendon Ave.
Mendota Heights
Page 20 Aviatian Noise Programs
RMT #22: Anne Marie �ail
Inver Grove Heights
:::::::.:::::::::::..:�:::::::::::::::::�::>.::::.:.:.::.::.;.:::::::.::...::.:.;: �.>�::::::.::;:::::::::::>;.:..:::::.:�: :::
:'�::::���:::cW::::;:::'�'>:. . :':: ;1�; .:`':' �::��7[::.;:::':::'::�:.`•j�;_;'t•���y�>.: .>
t�,'„�,,,i:�2�Ii�.,�,�.ii .:. �'�.:.i?;? ..•:::::::°:;i::... '?i: ;":::`::•::?:`2�'}7::':i?'�f;2STtJ% ii
' E: i: ::���.4:: :i ; i' �:'�' .:'
: •i• '�:::.':.::i� .:: :?:j •.;�!�'' ::
....................................................... ..................... ...................... ....................
08/30/'9516:37:27 B727 101.2 A
08l30/'9516:54:01 B727 98.3 A
08/30I9516:41:36 DC9 97.4 A
08/30/9516:39:09 B727 97.4 A
08/30/'9517:04:07 DC9 96.3 A
08/31/'9514:28:42 DC9 96.2 A
08/30/9517:03:05 DC9 91.6 A
08/OSI'9515:36:43 B727 88.6 D '
08/17/'95 20:22:19 B727 89.5 D
08lZ9/95 20:42:35, B727 89.3 D
RMT #24: Cha�el Ln. & Wren Ln.
E-agan
'::::::�::'�:::::<:::'::: �
.:> ....: : : :.: : ¢: : .; :
. .......
:�:�#�:::;::`:� >::���`:;��:>::. �:: :';� ��:.;::.;�:'>:::�.:'�>:�:
.:_� .
������ . �:t�:::�:��� �::;;::::�<:: "
:;�::':�:::
;'��:�:�; �'
;: . ...
.:���:�:�::.::
08/31I'95 20:17:35 B727 101.4 D
08/31I95 20:14:03 B727 99.6 D
08I28/'9518:44:52 I}C;9 98.8 D
08/31/95 20:34:01 F3737 98.7 D
08rL4/9516:48:45 �3727 98.6 D
08121/'9515:43:33 8737 98.5 D
08/30/9519:03:41 3727 98.5 A
08/30/9517:10:22 Fi27 97.4 A
08l21I9518:14:50 �"'27 97.2 A
08l31/'95 21:01:20 � f27 97.2 D
• � I
� IVT2tfOj?O11t8II i�llnOl�S COIIIII11SS10II
Flight ����k Base Map
; Airport Noise and Ope�•ations Monitoring S
�
�
,.
Aviatia�n Noise Pro�!•ams . _
Page 21
, v5�' v ,�C����
• ,y, ,.
t % � '� ^.c� < ` i.��oCt
t •". `\�\
y)��." r .. . ,�. ti�
1',�.� � . � � `
�� . . \.` .'.1�� �
� � . ..( � y'�Y.�
. .. , f > � �` �t����
� t.� s�r"r .� �
_� � �ly� �',`�y�'�1'L S--'.. � � �^�
' '' � Y +d1/�v.d,Tt ..'
t �y r �` � � 4 ^.��-�� �F��►���f�i ��
a,� i�, �°���}� •�,�� � � � �. s °r,�'pa �
•°'r . y� �'�` g? r��y 1� �.. -:.
cv �
; �I `*'����:� d . �q6 '3z -+� -� °
'�,y. �.. . Er 1� A �i�a x r...
ero .hF1^I. c. r� " 1
` •.:K���.�. - c� }� �S1i�7�•V', . .
.. '-.c� lY:U� .: ..
..��, . . . a., � �. .a ' � " _
. '��,�.- _,, � . _ ' ��,���y ; a
'�,�'�- � \',i � w •� � Y �1Y� J Y ,
s ^ V e C .
� � � �` 2 t i.R 'Fri�� � �.
� � `�,`Z � h4 - �N � 1 � 7
�� g{;tiL��`;. y Y.� rra "r s �.
�'.t y�y ,f,�, 1 1 T M �
_ ��;�L�Z o �s � � , `t ',
�i�7,�►`,��.� �, � ' a.,�
t9���►.'`ev . Z�'.;�ir.�...-•.. _ . - . /.. �?i:
' fi `�
i ;, '��"
. �� �
♦ �
- Z �
. \\.
:,y � �
r �k +
�,n/��s,y ,.
3j�1 i7�} l �• �`
• . �� �L � �� �;a N }� J , .
•. ; � � r�, �� „� � .;,L a t�
..,.- --
�
�i �
G' ° * a #'ts ``° E% t _
�i r
��'� ,�, i 9�ild�!ii ���rl� �4 ,
.o.,�r�4�N.'� f�' e � ,y :�: :
F s x
F��i+ �, .. � ' _..
... ' Y t.. . . �
c °'� t � �2 .. '
�1 �� o- % F �:} '
4� , ,.
s
ay .
. � .
, 4 / '.
i " tT t �� i .��: •K �}h.
. '���. . .5� � i . n. _ . . : v"ai:5�....
�''� � �
� .
� �. ,y� l
�ai»�, ,
. ����
; .' � �
. + � a �
• i h. �
, `. �. � . },�,,,., e e
,P 1 � t a�: '��'�i. ' �
�' ��� 4 �tt., �' .� �r�: �. �1 � .
� � < 4�if �`.t :��� _. �'�. ; A.:t�r
; ... .w �V;f'h�U �Qr�AI �1'�1 '�� - ��.
:f i� N `'" : rj ti �,td+ ii , +�+m^"`# • � .
�. Z,� , g �yJT1 A:
''ybl r'�rNft��,�,1/-t t).o =,J3'L*'T Y u
4 1 � pn� r(� �W
� � ���� t� r ��1"����
�F�' B r
. �,"y,�-�:1fiti ac'. "-� �'� � ` �
• � - . , � �..�i . s .
, �� - � r , . t'�'6',� ..r � � .
. , r r <) �
�s �ji �•
� 1 t .> '"� "r � �j^�!. _
� �
�
� � , � /'�,�,f .
- ^��5� � � `�p��.• v.
`,.��>'�
b: � t .. i . .....
. `
, �ki1l ���,, , y� . "4 I�F . 1 �.
y � < b
� �tl1N�„ � , ;, i �. 1�3 � r ,�� rt ,t,
�����+•� ��,�i� ��l�t �1 . `=i4 ,� l
Il Ii1��4�h4•...�. . iI�{�� . ,.y. .. �..,. �..��_.�
� L � �� � 1
, • , ?3 r: �i�:w..r.
. .. ' ��`�_ ya� + �I
��
. .. ' r � ' � ' '„ 2P9�i.r.�l}I'' :
_ �'.� .. t � �.\v���
. ;
•��°ZY � V ~ . � ''���``#�.�
rj� y"`���_,�, ,z . ♦ <i:�°�
��. , „'!� ���t �.,�
, � �„ � M � ��tp " �'�� ` -
': SS r 1:.. ✓ /' -.. '�y i � . .
' ���''r°� e � r�L,' � �r�a q .
�� ��� '"� '
', :��� yt� �;�� �.�--�.�.��. - St � r �� -
. '�.i.�iRf r M�i. ..+�',y..- --�f, . t, ..
� ' '�y�r< �j.jf� JG �id ��: :..� �1 .s n! 4'•j
. �'.... t��� �Y � } _ _ 'fe.
¢Y�.r �»�>� .
�M ' •
r �` ,, <' . . �%f�`,�cs _
_ �.�� ���, ��,�,���
+ `�o� ouw�j��
. a �
�� � ��y�'� �� � ,;�•�
?.�� is �ti ' . S.c'sr • � .} .
� ' S '��L , � \ .
�
�� R����i'i.� ; . . - t `. .,
s�� n�a i ���� �1 � `�� �
!e��t{�Y1Ql�c`�.��\a�y�,�` �L�1� �i=fl' .e � ' 7 tlfi�."
��l�11��,{� � c1 �i+ t` w~ .. . . . _ "�7 iZs �:
y 1�?1i�') ` "� 5 . v .... � � / .:
r �4'�� ���i�WR
y � ���� � ^ �' . :
r : . �.;;
. ; . ��� ;�
'1, +" �
r
' � ����'g ^??
x�: �+z� �.. . Y
. , , . �l rut's .� . ' . , �
r .+ �','yM.�}^''�
\� i "c'•j�, �.� �'
. i ___ . .. _ .fYSN:� . t'��� � . ..,
+. . .'M .' �'7
U�� _
• ����<.t •.
�`ii� ���� ♦
►._ �. .. �_,.. . .
�rFL� �;t 'i
.k;, r � ,
\ � '� . ^��� 'nI
�� 1 �, f�•�c
a�.� .. ,. .. ��.~:_�_., .�<
0
':.'-'�
.•
�
. i, I
• . Metropolitan Airports Commission
i
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn' dB(A)
August Ol to Aug�st 31,1995
Noise Monitor .�.�ocations
1 _ 58.4 60.4 63.1
2 60.1 61.7 64.8
3 55.4 61.3 67.0
4 57.9 62.7 65.6
5 54.9 * 63.2
6 60.7 * 70.4
7 60.2 * 66.0
$ 63.1 * 69.2
9 57.4 * 67.4
10 55.8 61.6 65.7
11 57.8 615 63.3
. 12 59.6 63.1 67.9
13 59.4 59.7 *
14 57.0 * 64.3
15 58.4 * 60.6
16 58.2 * 63.3
17 60.4 * 65.4
18 59.8 * 64.1
19 582 59.7 *
2p 56S 58S *
21 58.4 59.7 *
22 58.2 58.8 *
23 56.0 58.4 63.2
24 ' 60.1 64.0 685
25 565 62.1 66.2
26 58.8 61.4 65.3
27 57.4 61.3 67.4
2$ 58.2 58.9 67.3
29 58.7 59.9 673
30 59.4 60.8 66.2
' 31 575 582 63.6
Mo. Ldn 592 615 � 65.8
«Less than lwenty four hours of dala aHailable
69.9
70.8
71.3
662
62.8
66.6
62.7
662
685
69.4
63.3
672
64.3
68.4
64.7
652
66.6
67.0
70.1
70.1
68.6
63.2
63.3
*
66J
62.6
70.3
71.0
70.6
68.0
�
68.1
72.4
71.0
72.3
71.6
69.0
69.1
70.3
70.9
78.5
79.7
74.0
76.1
76S
77.6
70.9
71.7
73S
73S
78.2
77.7
77S
70.3
73.8
73.7
72.8
76.3
*
*
*
76.3
76.9
�
75.8
70.�i 66.1
73 {� 63.3
7� ? 67S
7".S 66.0
7�.2 66S
7f1.7 57.9
8t3.1 52.2
69.4 52.6
8U.4 692
5�.5 67.8
?�S 62.8
r �.3 60.6
��.5 65.8
8�.3 67.7
� :.6 57.8
,., :2 56.8
: �#.0 , 56.8
'��'.3 59.0
:�;).8 71.3
.. �? .0 66.3
'�J.7 67.1
• 4.0 55.7
: =�.7 61.6
- 3S 53.0
; 3.8 50.0
%3.6 64.2
�z9.1 49S
, 7.2 65.9
:�25 64.7
�9S 68S
•ti�.2 69.0
772 65.2
62.4 60.0
61.6 63.4
66.9 62.3
60.7 55.6
59.1 52.2
66.2 61.8
58.6 62.8
60.7 61.3
64.0 57.1
63.4 50.9
64.1 47.1
61.8 53.6
t
62S 52.6
66.0 45.6
60.1 59.4
59.4 ti46.0
59.1 45.3
60.8 54.2
63.7 43.7
64.3 55.4
65.3 58.8
57.4 *
60.0 *
62.9 . 52.2
55.4 62.4
52.4 50.6
51.0 � *
62.1 *
612 *
66.8 *
649 49.6
63.2 61.3
Aviation Nai;� Programs •
57.3
�
�
64.9i
67.7�
66.OI
��
60.7,
57
502
57.7�
�
S1Si
545�
,
59.1 �
,
53.1
�
57.4
57S
44.3
56.9
55.1
565
56.0
56.3
53.7
59.1
52.6
48.9
50.2
46.1
49.8
60.0
52.0
52.6
47.9
53.3
44.9
48.4
512
49.7
49.4
47.6
55.4
52.8
45.6
45.6
565
47.7
55.3
�435
55.1
Page 25
Analysis of Aircraft Noi�e Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
August Ol t�� August 31,1995
Noise 1V��:�itor Locations
; .::.::::.::.:.::::::::::;. ;:..:::::..;....::: .;::::.:.:.:::::.; :::::.:.:.:.......:.:...:::::::::: ;..;. : .. ..:.:�. .::::.:,:.:.::::: ; >�:..:::::::::::::: ::;:>:.: ,,:.::..:: :;�:::::.::::::::.: ;�:::::::::::.;;:�; ;�:::::::::::::::.: ;�:::.:.� ..::.>�: >
:: .:::.:.:..:::.. •::::.: :::..::.:. ..:.:::.....:. ::::::>:..:•..:::....:::: .:•:•:...:•�•::.:::
'.: ::'�:i� :::::::� ..:::::.:::.:::: ;.:....,:�..; :::::>:;��,�.'�:,•4:::> :",."..:'�:: :;:: .:r:.::.,:.: :::: ::�:.:..,,'.:::s: :' : '::�:;::;:
.
.>�'::: :>. :�� �:.f ��•>:. ; > .> :: :. .: :.. :� :: :: ::. > . :. ;: :: ':. .' '.: :: :: :: � � > :: : . •: .: ,: ;.:.: :: :. : � .. :� �:
:::. ;�&���� �'::: :: <::.::��::.;;: ::"`<��:�:':�::' :; �;����':� ::�'�:��..��. . ... ..�. .. :�'�� . . �,�,.� . .....�,�.Q.. . . ...:��.. . . .� `.�r�. ..... . ?�.��. . . � .
. i
1 61.4 67S 65.7 72.8 60.1 ; * 63.1 57.3 * 61.3 71.1 *
2 63.0 69.8 68.6 71.6 59.8 i * 59.1 60.0 60.7 63.7 72.4 *
3 44.2 64.0 58.8 69.0 f4.2 : 75.6 72.8 63S 50.4 58.7 58.7 *
4 645 68.9 68.4 73.6 :;5.2 ~ 682 68.3 55.2 61.0 61.3 76.7 *
5 635 71.3 65.6 74.8 �3.1 ; 71.3 72.8 52.7 61S 61.4 75.7 58.8
. 6 67.0 71.1 71.6 75.3 ti2.9 . 63.3 60.3 57.3 60.4 64S 78.9 64.3
'7 66.2 69.7 67S 73.6 . 58.9 .�i1.7 47.3 49.0 60.8 63.8 77.0 57.1
$ 64.9 68.9 68.0 72.9 49.2 ; * 50.9 49.2 61.3 * 74.8 63.5
r•
9 51.2 69.7 56S 70.3 66S ; * 73S 64.7 505 * 59.1 63.3
10 52.7 665 57.6 70.0 64.8 : * 73.0 63.2 54.6 58.4 66.7 54.8
.11 64.7 69.7 66.0 74.3 56.3 i�7.7 51.4 52.4 64.0 61.0 75.6 61.9
12 63.0 69.8 68.7 75.6 57.5 t�.`tb.7 54.0 58.9 61.0 61.4 75.9 59.7
13 66.0 71.8 68.6 76.1 59.6 '��.7 62S 57.7 61.4 61.8 78.0 62.8
14 49S 64.8 56.9 69S 64.0 `:'32 73.3 572 61.2 58.1 61.1 64.1
15 65.7 71.7 66.3 74.0 63.8 * 58S 55.1 61.9 62S 76.3 58.3
16 63S 72.0 65.1 74.9 . 58.0 � 49.8 43.6 60.8 61.9 75.3 59.8
,
17 65.8 70.6 675 , 74.8 52.1 * 522 51.6 63.3 63S 77.7 59:8
18 662 70.3 69.1 73.1 * �:-:s.7 48.2 52.4 62.3 61.7 76b 60.9
19 47.1 64.6 47.3 69.6 50.3 �;.0 46.3 }56S 46.7 59.1 55.8 *
2Q 50.4 662 54.1 69.0 60.1 1?3 69.6 51.4 53.0 57.4 58.8 *
21 44.6 612 53.1 67.0 57.b t,=,a.9 72.0 56.3 53.7 542 57.1 *
22 65.2 68.7 66.6 72.1 52.3 z_ :.0 562 52.3 615 60.4 76.3 69.9
23 64.6 71.3 65.4 73.7 62.1 " �r �.4 48.7 46.7 62.1 61.1 75.6 70.6
24 66.0 * 69.3 71.4 63.4 �::.8 51.2 425 63.8 62.4 75.6 72.8
25 66.4 65.3 65.2 71.9 56.b :=S 52.0 56.3 60.4 59.4 73.6 66.6
26 61.3 69.8 63.9 73.6 � 61.8 ;�?,5 50.7 . 47.8 58.9 60S 74.1 *
2'7 61.4 * 64.1 70.3 58.8 ��F3: �i 46.3 40.4 57.4 57.7 72.8 *
28 61S * 64.3 72.0 56.1 :� '�. i S1S 50.6 57.9 60.6 73.6 *
29 65.9 69.4 67.8 71.7 47.6 �;' �� 53.1 50.7 60.1 * 75S *
30 62.6 662 68S 70.6 53.3 ��3.�c 68.3 492 57.9 * 73.7 *
31 41.1 63.3 53.4 68.3 65.2 `%"�.5 71.7 56.7 61.4 61.6 58.6 73.9
Mo. Ldn �� 71.4 67.4 732 62.0 ��i.7 67.3 58.3 612 61.8 75.0 74.1
• Less lhan twenty four hours of data avaitable
Page 26 Aviati� No�se Progrsms
Metropalitan Airports Commission
��
6 .
�
Froposed North Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis `,�
Minneapalis - St. Paul International Airport �
August 1995
0.5 %(48) Carrier Jet Departures North of Proposed 095° (1V�
Corridar Paliey Bvundary
Page 2 Aviation Noise �'xograins - - '
il
Ntetropoiican ,4irports commission
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
�
August 1995 �
�I�
8089 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
28 ... Carrier Jet Departures %) !I
North of Proposed 095° (1Vn Corridor Policy Bouridary
I I
.... ... �.....:. .. : ... .��.s.. ��
�::� .. .. .. } .. .. . .. : . .. . . . . . .. . . . . ��� : � - �. ° . � �:> .
:.<= . � . .
. . : i .
:::' ' � I �
., . � :
• �. I .
' ' I '
• • •
•• . .
t:�� • . :
� •� c:L-• • • I
.... ' • • . .
.... � • �
... • • . • I �
� � .
•
�• � �
..... • •
.... � • • , I
� • � ' .
c„>
� ... • • I �
. .. ' ; I
c::: . ' .
c::� • . ' .
� ' I .
• I .
.. • I
, I
� . . . � �� � . , . " .. ., . . .. . . , �. . .. . . .. .. .
j, .
Aviatian Noise Programs "` i
Page 3
�•
Metropolitan Airports Commission .
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
August 1995
8089 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
20 ... Carrier Jet Departure - Early �rnout (0.2%)
(North Side Before Three Miles)
t t
�:-� ...... . .... .. ... , .... .. .. . .......
.... , . .
. . .
....
:::: ............ ................ ......................... ...:,............................. .... ......... . ....
.... , . . . .
�. . . . .
.. . �
. .
. , .
. •
.
.. , .
-�� . . .
... . . :
.... f:::' . : .
c'� I .
..... ' : �
Y. t' •
♦ ♦ v � ' .� .. t ♦
Page 4 Aviation No�se Programs
�i
MetrapoliEaui �►irparts Commission
��
Southern Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
August 1995 �
. �
,
�
;
13.2% (1066) Carrier Jet Degartures ,
South af Carridor (South of 29L Localizer)
Aviatian Noise Programs �� Page 5
Metropolitan Airports Commission
� Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
August 1995
8089 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
979 ... Carrier Jet Departures 12.1%)
South of Corridor (South of 29L Localizer)
. . .�.4 . � . ' . . . . • .. . . �� • . . . ..
C:�� . .. . . . � ��� � � r' .. , •4 . . . . .. . . . . .� •'S , . `: . • ' �
:.C'. , '
• .
c.:�
r_: +
•
. �
� •.
�• •
: �
•�
y `• • •
�/ N � • • �
11� .���� �•
'a►'
r•
j• .�• .
;_"..`'� �l . .
. •..
; ; ;.. .
���! �~ i
�� �� •
�•• '
••
. ����`
�r�.� •� • •
� • � • � • = •
� • r
. � � • .
: . : •
� . .
• • •' .
. �� •
.
: • • .
i
-. ...,, .. `;.. --4:...� . . .... ; t'....
Page 6 Aviation Naise Ptograms
•, � Metropl
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airpoi
� I
August 1995
8089 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Depa
87 ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early �rnout
� (South Side Before Three Miles)
� . : . , s� •. � . , � � .. . .. • . .. .. . . �� . ` • .. i I .
�^: � v u . , .
..a • . I
i_�� •
..�.. • .
� • � �
� •
. • • • .
•
•
•
•
� � . I
�
• � � : •
• � � �
� �. • .
• �
♦ � M • • •� •
• �
� • •
• • � •: �� � . � �
• • • • � • � • • � •
•
� • � •
• � • . _ � • • :
� � •
• . • � �
•
. ;
r;
� � .. �r� . .. .. . �
Aviation Naise Programs
Airports Commission
Page 7
:.
�
�' Metropolitan Airports Commission
,.
Southern Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis
` Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
� August 1995
I
�
3.2% (260) Carrier Jet Departures S° South of Corridor
;
(5° South of 29L Localizer) �
�
Page 8
� Metropolifan Airports Commiss�i� �
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport ,
August 1995 `
8089... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
174 ... Carrier Jet Departures 2.2%)
5° South of Corridor (5° South of 29L Localizer)
. .� �: � . . :.; �. . . . . . . . : . .. . . ..
c;_> . � • . ., , . . . . � , . • : . . .. . • . .. . . �� . .. . ' .. . �
..c'
. •
• . .
�C�> ° .
•
� � •
•
• •
•
• ♦• •
� �� � • •
�� � • • •
:. �� • •
��Y• � • • �
, �� •
1� �
����
� ��
•���
�.• •
+ � • � � +
� . • � .
: • • � •
•• � :
��
. �
• •
0
<.;�,
..,. �..... . .....
Aviation Noise Programs
Page 9
r`.
L ' • �
' Metropolitan Airports Commission �
,. Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
� August 1995 .
. 8089 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departure
84 ... Carrier Jet Depaxtures - Early �urnout (1 Q
(South Side Before Three Miles) �
< < `. ` �
.. ...,... .. .... ... .••.. .. i
��-� . � �� .. .. '� � �� .. . . `. . . . . .. � . . . '•; . � -- � . , • .
�•.:�
�: :>
� I
. .
: � .
• � , � .
. . .
� � .
.
. . .
. • • . �
. ' " �' . �
.
.
. . � � .
, � + � . .� . � • �
. • . . • .
� � � • . . . �. . � . .
. � � � ,.
� t� � I
. .. .
.
� . , �. . . . �
• • .. .
. •
_ . .. .
• � .
a �
Y.
l ♦ v : � , . .. .. . ♦
Page 10 Aviatio� Noise Programs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
AG E N DA
�
AUGUST 22, 1995
t
7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m.
k
6040 28th Avenue South
Mirineapolis, Minuesota
i
Call to Order, Roll Call �
i
Approval of Minutes of Meetiag July 25, 1995
f
Introduction of Invited Guests
Receipt of Communications
Report of Eagan Neighborhood Informational Meeting i
�
Technical Advisor's Ruuway�System Utilization Report and Complaint Sui
, '
Persons Wishiug to Address the Couucil
Report of MAC Commissioni'meeting '
a I
Other Items Not on the Age'da
Adjournment
Next Meeting: September 26, 1995 ,
Note: Jeff Hamiel will present an update on MAC at the September 26 MASAC m
i
- .NO�.L'� ::.
.:. . .. � .. .
i M�SA�::
.a`t.. the::
o vii�e_ '
..... i
I
� i �
f
1 •
� MINUTES
METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL
GENERAL MEETING
� JULY 25� 1995
7:30 p.m.
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis� Minnesota
1. Call to Order, Roll Call
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p�m. and the
secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members were in attendance:
I
Marlc Salmen Northwest �
Jennife� Sayre Northwest
Brian Bates Airbome ;
Shawn Erving Sun Country '
Bob Johnson MBAA '
John Smith Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce
Ron Johnson ALPA - j
John Richter Minneapolis 'i
Jim Serrin Minneapolis I
Mike Teegardin Minneapolis
Gordon Wagne� Minneapolis I
Craig Wruck ' St. Paul
Carol McGuire St. Paul
Thomas Hc�eg _ St. Paul !
Don Priebe Richfield � �
Vem Wilcox Blooini�gton
Tom Egan Eagan �
Jon Hohenstein Eagan '
Jill Smith Mendota Heights I
Ed Porter Bumsville ',
Dale Hammons Inver Grove Heights i
Advisors i
Denis Comell FAA �
Ron Glaub FAA �
Joe Gasper MAC Commissione� �
John Foggia Technical Advisor I
Roy Fuhrmann MAC Supv.Aviation Noise Programs
Traci Erickson � • MAC ANOMS Specialist
Guests �
Bo .rys M. Polec Minneapolis �
Mike Wozniczka Minneapolis ;
0
1
2. A�provai of. Minutes
The minutes of the June 27, 1995, meeting were approved as presented.
Jim Serrin, Minneapolis, relayed a point of information from the MAC Commission
meeting June 19, 1995, which was not mentioned at the June 27, 1995, MASAC
meeting. Two members of MASAC attended the Commission meeting and spoke in
response to the consultant's report on the remote runway concept. The final report
did not include a number of costs which would be incurred by either moving the airport
to Hastings, o� staying at the cuRent location.
3. Introduction of Invited Guests
Receiqt of Communication
No invited guests.
Chairman Johnson recognized Shawn Erving, Sun Country Airlines, substituting for
Dale Kariya.
Chairman Johnson received a copy of a letter addressed to Mayor Tom Egan, from
Mark Salmen, Northwest Ai�lines, responding to the Northem• Dakota County Airpori�
Relations Coalition's request to add�ess the "distant" and "close-in" departure
p�ocedures as outlined by FAA Advisory Circular No. 91-53A. Mr. Salmen responded
that the MASAC Operations Committee will be evaluating the benefits of the NADPs,
and that final determination will be made by MAC, not the air carriers. MAC's final
decision will be based on the recommendation received from MASAC.
4. Reqort of the Operations Committee Meetin4 Julv 13. 1995
Operations Committee Chairman, Mar1c Salmen, reviewed the agenda items which
included: (1) City of Eagap request for flight track analysis, (2) NADP analysis status,
and (3) Nighttime Runway 22 SID. A copy of the Operations Committee minut�s are
attached. ; -
The target date to complete 22 SID and NADP analysis is mid-September. MAC
approved funding and implementation of GPS: MSP will be the first airport to install
(September 1995) a Differential GPS ground station.
The agenda for the August Operations Committee meeting will include discussion of
nighttime hours, introduction to nighttime shoulder hour analysis, and an update on
HNTB analysis.
5. Report: Destination Studv
t •
Roy Fuhrmann, MAC Superviso� Aviation Noise Programs, completed a study on MSP
aircraft destinations. A copy of this report is attached to the minutes.
2
The study was separated into all possible directions that can depart MSP. These
directions were then divided into Stage 2 and Stage 3 aircraft. Two I thirds of all
operations out of MSP head to destinations east, southeast, and south. (T'his
information is #aken from the "Official Airline Guide" - July 1995.] It is because of the
southeast predominant directions that an industrial comdor was planned and located
in Eagan and Mendota Heights. Mr. Fuhrmann further reviewed destination analysis
north versus south, and destination analysis east versus west, for July 1 i i 95.
The Desi�nat�on Study shows the relationship between where the planes are going and
how the airport is functioning with our parallel n.inways. The majority of destinations
for departures at MSP are southeast and south (approximately 62%) ; I It is not a
random factor that determines where aircraft go. The direction of the flow is a function
of the wind, and the RUS. Flight tracks show northwest departures have more of a
fanning pattem. The study shows: (1) more tums to the south and southeast causing
a greater fan off the northwest side of the airport than we do on the southeast side
because that is the direction where the aircraft are heading, (2) runways are used
relative to the destination of the ai�craft to the greatest extent possible in the interest
of safety and expediency.
A discussion session followed. i
Jim Serrin, Minneapolis, asked if the flights o�t of MSP could operate any differently
if destination were not a prime factor? What other methods could be used to more
equally distribute traffic? Chairman Johnson referred this consideration to the
Operations Committee for review. _
Report: ANOMS Technical Difficulties �
Traci Erickson, MAC ANOMS Specialist, presented an overview of the problems,
effects and solutions of the MASAC reports due to technical difficulties. I'
Svstem Modifications
* Tracor hardware - new hardware installed at Air Traffic Control Tower.
* Tracor Software - format change of flight data received from Tracor
� ANOMS module failure - new flight track data fom�at unrecognized by�
* Network Problem - diskdrive failure, purchase of additional equipment
Svstem Outqwt '
* May Technical Advisors Report
Partial report from May 1 to May 19, 1995
Tracor hardware installed
Tracor software change
` June Technical Advisor's Repo�t
Partial report from June 12 to June 30, 1995
Further system deterioration
Tracor flight trackeformat •
Network reconfiguration
Outcome
* Tracor hardware successfully installed
,NOMS
* Tracor software change addressed
* Format recagnizable ta ANOMS scripts
* Fligh# track dafa reprocessed
* Network to be completely reconfigured
The abbreviated June 1995 Technical Advisors Report distributed at this mee#ing does
not contain ANQMS data.
The follawing reporks wil4 be campleted when the ANQMS network is repaired: May
Corridar Repo�t, June Technical Advisor's Report, June Comdor Repart. A comp(e#e
set af July repo�ts wi!! be distributed at the August MASAC meeting.
6. Technical Advisor's Runwav Svstem Ufiiixation Report and Camqlainf Summarv
See above repart.
7. Persons Wishinq to Address the Council
Borys Polec, Minneapolis, reiterated noise complaints, On July 14 electricity was out
for 44 hacars {opert windows}. All MSP nighttime operations were very loud Stage 2
aircraft.
John Richter, Minneapolis, relayed that the Ciiy af Minneapolis naw requires ail new
employees and executives to live within the city limit. Mr. Richter mentioned three
� individuals he knows af that do not live in �outh Minneapo(is because�of the pounding
�:� aircraft noise. The aircraft noise. is negatively impacting praperty values in Minneapolis
and affecting the tax base in Hennepin county.
8. Report of MAC Cammission Meetinq - Julv 1i. 1995
Chairman Johnson reported that a special commision meefing was he(d in the mdming.
The formet Di�ector of the Denver Stapletan Airport; and the curren# City of Denver
Planning Director, were asked by the Commission to provide background, politica{
implications, and process, which led to the decision to develop a new, major airpart i�
Denver. Some of fhe experiences #hey gained throughaut the developmen# process
af the new airport were -"all forecasts are wrong'", and strong, dynamic political
leadership is needed. C}veraEE, the presentatian was a positive review o# the whaie
situatian. An interest ta this group is a statement made: 'The noise does not go
away". Since the airport opened, 13�700 noise camplaints have been reparted, and
most af the complaints came from 17 to 22 miles south of the airport. Building a new
ai�poct daes nai ge# r�d of #he noise.
Jan Del Galza added that part of•the noise camplaint problem is there is some mis-
communication betwee� the FAA and the Airport over what fhey thought were going
to be the ilight tracks. They are nat using the fligh# tracks that everybody thought they
agreed to. �
A discussion session followed. j
i
- the 17-mile out noise complaints will go away after a year.
- people's perception of noise �
- effect of property values around the old airport �
- a special commission meeting will be held July 26 regarding sc
opening of the new Northwest Ai�iines maintenance base. �
9. Other Items Not on the Aqenda
None.
10. Adioumment
Chairman J�ohnson adjoumed the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Jean Deighton, Secretary
UPCOMING MEETING DATES
Full Commission
September 18, 1995
1:00 p.m.- Room 303
Planning & Environment Committee
September 5, 1995 _
1:00 p.m. - Room 301
0
5
MASAC I
September 26, 1995 �
7:30 p.m. �
�
heduling the
1
��
MINUTES
MASAC OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
JULY 13, 1995
The meeting was held at the Metropolitan Airports Commission General Office Boardroom, and
cailed to o�der at 1:35 p.m.
The following members were in attendance:
Mark Salmen, NWA - Chairman
Bob Johnson - MBAA
Chuck Curry, ALPA
Gordon Wagner - Minneapolis
Craig Wruck, St. Paul (Tom Hueg, Alternate)
John Nelson, Bloomington
Dick Keinz, MAC
Tom Lawell, Mendota Heights
Jon Hohenstein, Eagan
vi :
John Foggia - Technical Advisor
Bruce Wagoner - FAA
AGENDA
City of Eagan Request of June
NADP Analysis Status
Nighttime Runway 22 SID
The minutes of the July 7 meeting were approved as presented. � �•
�
EAGAN REQUEST
A letter of request dated June 8, 1995, was received from Jon Hohenstein, City of Eagan, and
acknowledged at the MASAC meeting June 25, 1995. The Eagan Airport Relations Commission
asked for flight track analysis for operations southeast of MSP for the weekends of April 29-30 and
May 6-7. The first of the two weekends had extremely loud aircraft noise, while the second
weekend was quiet. Eagan is interested in an analysis of these two weekends, in terms of
-compliance with current corridor boundaries, and a gate analysis following Wescott Road from the
eastem boundary of Eagan to a point one mile west of that boundary. The letter also requested
the same tracking analysis for the weekend of June 3-4 due to extremely high levels of traffic
reported in both northem and eastem Eagan. The City asked MAC to discuss conditions of those
weekends with the FAA to deter me operations or weather conditions which caused the difference
in noise on the eastern edge of�agan.
A discussion followed:
{
�
I
I
�
Jon Hohenstein relayed that the residents of Eagan are asking why noise is so noticiably different
on those dates. Th�community has very real, and serious concerns regarding aircraft noise in this
area. I �
John Foggia �esponded that ANOMS data is not available for June 3 and 4. Analysis will not be
able to be completed for these two days. Data was lost (erased) when the system was being
repaired and it cannot be recovered. Roy Fuhrmann added that ANOMS is having network
/software problems and the equipment needs to be updated. August 7-11 Larson Davis will be in
to work on the system. There will be upgrades on the software and new equipment arriving.
John Foggia informed the committee that a noise monitor has been placed in the Ilrea (Eagan -
Hawthorne Woods) by request of the MASAC Chair. The monitor is temporary,� and data will
gathered for a period of one month. I
Bruce Wagoner, FAA ATC, relayed that it would be more helpful to the FAA if requests, such as
the above, were made at the time it happens. � I, �
� I
MASAC agenda as an information item. The committee and staff concurred.
NOISE ABATEMENT DEPARTURE PROFILES (NADPs)
John Foggia reported that HNTB will be completing contours for a variety of projects'requested by
this group. The HNTB stafF is currently in transition regarding personnel. Some delay is expected
on the following contour analysis requested by this group: ! I
� Crossing proposal under non-simultaneous departure conditions of
� NAOP analysis -
� Nighttime Runway 22 SID single event contours '
�
An information package was distributed to all committee members containing:
-� Operations summary midnight to 5 a.m.
-� Wind analysis midnight to 5 a.m.
-� Altitude analysis at equivalent 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 DME flight distai
-� Chuck Curry, ALPA, was asked for written comments on NADP
11 UR
Chairman Salmen said that Northwest continues to receive correspondence on the NADPs. If the
communities a�e also getting requests on the NADP issue, please forward them to appropriate
MASAC representatives for channeling through the Operations Committee. He reiterated that the
airport authority will ultimately determine the correct and best procedure for MSP. This body will
only make a recommendation. All carriers will use the method determined. I
i
�IADP data will be reported to this group upon completion, and then forvvarded to MASAC.
RUNWAY 22 NIGHTTIME SID
John Foggia relayed the FAA Great Lakes Regional office is hesitant and concerned to move on
any issues relating to the Runway 4/22 extension while a lawsuit is pending. The FAA Region is
concerned about the lawsuit in general, and on all Runway 4/22 issues. They prefer not to put
another variable onto 4/22 by adding a SID. This group can continue on the analysis on a lower -
priority basis, but the FAA will most-likely not act on a 22 SID with a lawsuit pending.
John Nelson, Bloomington, referred to the FAA check list document N7210.360 which may request
a contour (application requirements are listed on page 3). Mr. Nelson stated that the contour being
done by HNTB should provide FAA criteria requested in this document.
A �eport package was distributed to all members containing the following data analysis �equested
at the last meeting. John Foggia reviewed the material.
O erations: A summary was done by month for 10 months in 1994, between the hours of midnight
- 5:00 a.m. for jet carrier only, and for all operations. Fluctuations in number of operations from
month-to-month are due to non-scheduled flights and seasonal activity.
Wind analysis: A summary was done ftom October 3, 1994 through June 21, 1995, midnight - 5:00
a.m. depicting the wind-favored runway during those hours, taking into account 0 tailwind or up to
10 knots on the "any runway" column. One-half of the time, operations can use any runway.
Approximately 70% of the time, Runways 11 and 29 are favored.
Altitude analysis: Average altitude by gate was completed for equivalerit flight distances of: 6.0
DME, 6.5 DME, and 7.0 DME. The analysis used the months of March, June, September, and
�� December 1994. Temperature definitely affects aircraft performance and altitude.
John Foggia reported that an investigation of using an MSP Terminal VORTAC radial vs. heading
was completed. Using a radial off the MSP VORTAC is not viable because of various sector
limitations on radial information reception. The VOR portion of MSP VORTAC is unusable below
3000 ft. in altitude, and unusable.from R205-R235 at all distances and altitudes. The TACAN
portion �of the MSP VORTAC, which provides distance information (DME), is not restficted.
Therefore, the proposed SID is valid as wo�ded: "Bs soon as rtraciical after takeoff. furn left to a
180' (M) heading. At 3.5 DME from the MSP VORTAC turn ri�ht fo a 240' (M) headinp Ex�
vec%rs on course after a2 ssina 6.5 DME".
Destination Analysis Runway 11 UR and 22 The majority of departures from Runways 11 UR,
(61.86%), depart to the northeast, east, southeast, and south. The majority of departures from
Runway 22, (55.77%) depart to the northwest, north, �ortheast, and east. The destination study
showed 77.39% of all air traffic heads west, southwest, south and southeast. The top five
destinations departing MSP are: (1) Chicago (2) St. Louis (3) Denver (4) Detroit (5) Dallas/Ft.
wortn.
Chuck Curry, ALPA, requested a change to the final 22 SIO wording to include altitude. ALPA
would be against an�y turns below 500 feet. He recommended to delete the "As soon as practical
after takeoff° verbiage and replace it with "At 1400 MSL". A discussion followed� The actual
departure plate will take into account all necessary parameter wo�ding for the SID. Bob Johnson.
taken and carried unanimouslw.
John Foggia info�med members that mid-September (60-days) is the target date to complete 22 SID
and NADP analysis and check list. Staff will advise HNTB of this timeline. � I
Information item. The MAC Planning and Environment Committee approved the New Noise
Management Methodology. The MAC Management and Operations Committee approved funding
and implementation of GPS. Both items will be forvvarded to the July full Commission meeting as
consent items. In September 1995, MSP will be the first airport to install a Differential GPS ground
station - "excellent noise abatement benefits". ! �
Chairman Salmen relayed that this group will continue with the next topics on the 1995 MASAC
Goals and Objectives schedule. The agenda for the next Operations Committee meeting will be
'(1) discussion of nighttime hours, (2) introduction to nighttime shoulder hour analysis and (3)
update on HNTB analysis. j �
The next Operations Committee meeting was scheduled for August 24, 1995 at 1:30 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Jean Deighton
Committee Secretary
4
3
•` i`
. . . t+
�� ��� ����
� �� � � �
� � �
� e� ��a ��►� �
_________;___,____;_____,_____ _
���c �� z�� �i e a a
. � �
-' ------ •-• •"--� . _. . _ ..__.�.__��..'--- "--�_._...- "_....__. _. _.' ' -.. ». "--"_"'--"-'-----
Direction of Travel I Departures
, F.�at
1
% of Dep
'7"t.2��6
��.78°�b
- _ .., - :. .... . .. . : ..
� V Vy�
a
0
� -�
'_�, v
f
�-
�
:�
�e
�
:, i
. . � ;
MEETING SUMMARY �
Y,
, .
�
PART 150 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION DESIGN
POLICY ADVISORY COMMITT'EE
SEPTEMBER 8, 1995
The meeting was held at the General Office of the Metropolitan Auports� Commission, MASAC �oom. The
following voting members.were in aitendance: Dore Mead, Janue Verbrugge, .Jon Hohenstein, Tom
Lawell, Bob Johnson, Garol Kummer, Bob Johnson; Richard Keinz. Consultants: Colin Campbell-CEE,
Mary Raasch-CEE, and Pat Goodwin-Goodwin Communications. Advisorv: Steve Vecchi � Tom Brown,
Roy Fuhrmann, John Foggia, Glen Orcutt-FAA I
Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 12:15 p.m. �
. . . � ,
Beview of Non-Participants 1992-1995 Grant Year ' �
Steve Vecchi reviewed the "Part 150 Sound Insulation Program Non-Participant" report which was
distributed at the meeting. The report totaled eligible homeowners by city who chose not to participate in
the program: � Minneapolis 64, Bloomington •16, Richfield 30, Eagan 6, and Mendota Heights 1.�
Approximately 10% of homeowners selected for the program are "non-participants". F
. . ' � . . . : �•' ,� - , -
Mr. Vecctu asked the �committee to discuss policy on how to handle future "deferred" non-participants
wanting to get back into the prograin. Steve relayed that the small amount of homes�involved will riot haveY, �.
a major effect on the yearly-city-specific workscopes. Since tlie Part 150 Program will only involve �the ' `
ciries"of Ivlinneapolis and North Richfield by 1997, the PAC should reach an agreement regarding homes ,' " �
that wish to be re-activated in ciries that have already concluded their� worl�scope �(such � as Eagan and ,� �
Mendota Heights). � . . . . , . : . . ;. = _ .- - � . - , . .. . .., . ... � a , i � � .. � � . - i .
. . ; .
The committee felt the non-participant homes should remain eligible. Defenals for medical reasons�should .
be reserved for future program participation.' Members agreed that �at this time, a policy 4is' not needed.' " '�
Staff will continue to handle the issue in the same good manner in which they have.been. Chairman
Johnson added, that policy can be established at a later date if needed. ' f :
F�onosed DNL Contour Edge Policy (as it relates to "contingency" blocks� '' " �� �
Steve Vecchi opened discussion today by asking members to revisit the block eligibiliry issue and to �
develop an official recommendation for MAC Commission consideration. The decision �made today will
be presented to the MAC Planning and Environment Committee, and full Commission. After approval, staff
will submit an official eligibility request'to the FAA.- �" _ . ' � ` � ,� � � - . ,
� , . , `�R,.. .- �. . , . , , . ... � : , �� .. . -�: • • ; :�' . . ',�. • . : .
� � -��,. � •� ... � - . -::: : -' ..� �-:- ' = ., �.
Recently the FAA requested that MAC submit�an official�recommendation regarding the eligibility policy
for boundary blocks in the MAC Part1150 Residential Sound Insulation Program. Once approved by FAA,
this policy would define � Part'� 150 eligibility for blocks� intersected � by the outermost DNL65 contour
boundary� of the certified Noise Exposure Map (NEM) for the remainder of program implementation. �Since •�
�. . . , • .. . �.. . ., r - ' . . - ' " . • . ,I� . ' `
_ - , ". ' .. . � - " �.�s " ' , . . � _.. ' , . ,.z . , . . - .t . , ' .
_ ;
• i . -
.. . . . • 1 . . ' � - ' . .
. • J
, . ' .� !. i' ' r � ,K' � _•Y 4 • x .. ., 1 . , .� ' ' . . , .�. a . ' .�.�+L".._r'�° ' + . ^ ' .. . .
i . " ` . • • . . .. , V�'� �� �.4� ' + '
.a . - ^ t . . .. - n ^ , � 'L i. . : � : � , a. ` .! � , :•� �•y•4'• - _ .
the 1992 "pilot" Sound Insulation Program, MAC has based Part 150 eligibility on the cert�ed 1996 Noise
Exgoswe Man.
Since the origin of fhe MSP Part 150 Sound Insulation Program in 1991, the Policy Advisory Committee
(PAC) assumed that Part 150 program eligibility would include blocks that were intersected by the
outermost 1996 DNL65 contour line. This assumption was included in staffs original Part 150 Sound
Insulation Program cost projections (8,900 homes at an estimated cost of $1501Vp. The PAC based this
block eligibility assumption on the following rationale: ,
—� Level of accuracy in the DNL contour methodology (±SdBA).
� Due to the lack of geographical boundaries that exist within a typical block, it �is not
feasible to determine "eligible" and "in-eligible" homes within a block that is intersected
� by the outermost boundary of the certified Noise Exposure Map.
—� Since city streets and roads serve as acceptable geograplucal boundaries, they can be used
to separate "eligible" blocks (blocks that are wholly contained or intersected by the DNL
65 contour on the cerrified Noise Exposure Map) and "ineligible" blocks (blocks located
entirely outside the DNL 65 contour on the certified Noise Exposure Map's boundary).
During the 1992-1994 time period, the FAA approved the eligibility of eight (8) blocks in the city of Eagan
and Minneapolis that were intersected by the 1996 DNL65 contour line on a case-by-case basis. In a letter
dated July 31, 1995, the FAA iaformed staff that they wuld no longer be making case-by-case eligibility
decisions and asked that MAC make an official request for a methodology for dealing with all remaining
blocks that aze intersected by the outermost boundary of the 1996 Noise Exposure Map.
�R It should be noted tl�at this planning assumption differed from Commission's 1992 eligibility request W the
4': �
FAA in the submittal of, the Part 1 SO Study Update (Mazch 1992). In addirion to the blocks intersected by
the 1996 Noise Exposure Map contour, the Commission's recommendation included a 65 block area (794
homes; $13.7M cost) located entirely outside the contour boundary wluch were considered to be
geographically "inseparable" with other eligible blocks. The PACs origina11991 assumprion did � include
these biocks. � _
Roy Fuhnnann, MAC GIS Specialist, presented various eligibility op�ions including:
OpHon 1 All blocks intersected by the outermost boundary of the
certified DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map (1996 DNL
NElvn would be eligible for participation in the MSP
Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. �
Optioa 2 Only blocks that contained a percentage (50%, 70%,
. 80%) of block azea within the outermost boundary of
. the certified DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map (1996 DNL
NEIvn would be eligible for pazricipation in the MSP
Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. ,
' ' , . .
Option 3 Only blocks fully contained (100%) withiii the outermost
, boundary of the certified DNL 65 Noise Exposure Map
(1996 DNL� NEM) would be eligible for participation in
the MSP Part 150 Sound Insulation Program.
2
�
�
i�. 'Y I
. ;
, . - �
, .
For each option, Mr. Fuhrmann presented conesponding information such as total blocks, total homes and
total cost (see attachments). � !
�
After a lengthy discussion, Jamie Verbru�ge, Rchfeld, moved� and Tom Lawell, Menr�nta uPj��
seconded. to recommend to the full Commission and the FAA_ full �ncl��cinn anrt el;gj�ty'for any�]�kY .
intersected bv the outermost DNL65 contow boundarv of the 1996 Nois� Exnoct��P Man i'n the Part 1 Sn _
•�ound Insulation Proeram. A vote was taken and unanimousl,�passed. � •
The following is a summary of the PAC's Part I50 eligibility recommendation based on the 1996 Noise
Exposure Map: '
• PAC ELIGIBILITY
RECOM1ViENDATION: �
PAC Totai B{ocks Total Homeg ToNal Cost Homes Remaininy Cost .
Recommended Completed ,
1992-1995 j
Blockc 406 5,720 s99.OM 1,493 57.3.1M
' Completely I
within the ,
65 Ld� contour
Biocks 122 2,256 S39.OM 30 538.5M
intersected by , ; �
the 65 Ldn
contour ' �
i
TOTAL 528 7,976 �138.OM 1,523 5111.6M
_ ELIGIBILIIY � I
BLOCKS . • -
I ,
i
� Regarding MAC's 1996 Capital Improvement Plan, the PAC expressed the need to pnepaaze an�fficial .
request to the Commission regard'wg 1996 Part 150 Sound Insulation'}Pragram funding levels. •
taken and unanimously_passed. (Staff has estimated that the yearly cost of the pmgram wil
The meeting was adjoumed at 2:05 p.m. .
- ;
>f � i
Respectfully Submitted: `
' Jean Deighton, PAC Secretary , �
1 . .
i
3
;�20.7M.)
e�
� , s
� � ` . � � - � ' � , ' i_ � ` � • + '
�`i: . _tl:'.. .�� ..1` _ •. . " " ' :.. �.... � .. ..yr. .+.,. , ..
� • • • � • . '- ` . ` r ..� . f • ., .� l . 1` .
�
' e i , � .. ' � ' , .,r.. ' + , � F��� .f'J�> .-�` d - , ` • . . ' .. � �
� . , .. . � . . �. . '�. � S.Fr. '+}. � ��LB. 'a • .
_ . }
F . . • .
. ' .. � . ... 1 ....... ._ � . ' � .. .
\ . . �. .. . ^ . ' ..� ' a. . . t .
, . ♦ • . � �'. .. . ' .
. � � i . � .
` '• M1 I , , • � , • � � ' � , ' � ♦.. . � , l. . � 1
.� � . . {'�t� . ' � . ' . .
, .. , �. .�'� . .. . '- . .. - � 'J ' � , . - . _. � , .. . " �
' • , � _ ' � � ' ' ' '''- � .
- . �'� - � { .. - .. , � ,�;, • ' • .
- .. . c � .
` . ti • ' ' • .. , . = i -�. , , , � •
. �� � _,. ' �• ., - . _ , = '
. .. . , . � ,' . . � . . .
' • ' . i: , . ` - . . , - . " .
} • ' , ,,. . , ' . " i •�,• - - ::� - ` ,
� �r-.x.r• > , .•:�, ; - , *• . "! .�. - , ., - � �:'%,:. . . ._
gj . ' ' . ' r . r•„ . • '., r' .'. , ` . '� •._ -�e; ' ,. , .
{ .. • _ .� . ",,r'���:i- • �. ., • • :.• - ,'✓•. • . w'�-`3~ „C•.`, . � � , ' _ . '
� . .._ . ' � "}" - .. •.s. .� . , . � ... { .. < '•� ^- - • ^ - . � .. ; y , , . - ` • .
t
i
NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY AIRPORT REI.ATIONS COALITION
MEETING MINUTES
AUGUST '1 C, 1995
The August meeting of the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition
(NDCARC} was calied to order at 7.35 a.m. in the Large Conference Room at the
Mendota Heights City Hall. Presiding over the meeting was Tom Lawell, Mendota
Heights, with the follavtili�g representatives present: Sunfish Lake, Mayor Frank
Tiffany, Glenda Spiotta (arrived 8:20 a.m.); Inver Grove Heights, Pete �,Amish,
Steve Hughes, Will Eginton and �inda Cummings; Eagan, Jon Nohenstein;
Mendota Heights, Ellsworth Stein. ��
i
�
Appraval Qf July 19. 1995 Minutes !
i
Coalition members reviewed the minutes of the meeting held on July 19, 1995.
Upon a motion by Ms. Cummings, seconded by Mr. Hohenstein, the minutes were
approved as written. � �
Global Positioning Satellite Presentation � � �
I
Mr. L.awetl noted John Foggia, MAC Noise Abatement Qffice, was unabte to
attend today's meeting ta provide a presentation on the capabilities and
imptementation schedule of gtobal positioning satellite technology at MSP, Mr.
Foggia wauld be willing to schedule a presentation before the group sometime in
the future. It was suggested this be an evening presentation where each City
could invite its full Commission membership to attend. Mr. Lawell indicated 4�e
wauld chec[c with Mr, Foggia on possible dates for th� presentation. Mr. �.awell
also indicated he had available a video tape which shows GPS approaches being
ftown along the Potomac River into Washington Nationai Airport. The group
decided to view the videotape at the end of the meeting. '(
Letter to Northwest Airlines Regarding Departure Profiles
The Coalition members present reviewed the letter from Mark Salmen, NWA
Manager, Airport Operations dated July 7, 9 995, and the draft Coalitio,n response
dated July 24, 1995. A number of suggested revisions were discussed, including
an expanded "carban copy" distribution tist. Mr. Hohenstein agreed to make the
recommended changes and send out for �Mayoral signature an original copy o# the
letter.
C��
NDCARC Meeting Minutes
August 16, 1995
Page 2
City Updates
Mr. Hohenstein noted that the City of Eagan is currently preparing its position on
the Dual Track Airport Planning Process. Several of their City Commissions are
currently working on this issue, including their Planning Commission and Economic
Development Commission. They intend to work on this issue this Fall, in hopes of
issuing their formal City position in November, 1995.
Mr. Hohenstein also updated the group on the status of the Runway 422
Extension issue. Due to the direct impact an extended 422 would have on the
southern portion of Eagan, they are closely following this issue and are
participating in the Metropolitan Council-led mediation discussions. It now
appears as if the runway extension will be built, but that a decision on the noise
' redistribution plan for the runway will be postponed. The Metropolitan Council has
formally approved the extension. The noise redistribution issues will be discussed
later this year and into 1996, in hopes of reaching some agreement in May 1996.
In general, the extension of 422 could help alleviate some of the departures using
�; runways 11 L and 11 R, but could mean a slight increase in the number of arrivals
using runways 29L and 29R.
Mayor Tiffany noted Sunfish Lake remains interested in airport related issues, but
has no separate airport related_commission or committee working on the issue.
�
Mr. Amish distributed a letter dated August 4, 1995 vShich was received by the
City of Inver Grove Heights from Mr. Salmen in response to a letter they had sent
to him dated May 25, 1995. The letter involved the subject of noise abatement
departure profiles and read similar to the one Mr. Salmen sent to the NDCARC in
early July, 1995.
Mr. Eginton stated Inver Grove Heights continues to be unhappy with the structure
of the MASAC organization and its lack of progress in dealing with airport noise
issues. Structurally, he expressed concerns about the off-setting membership
requirements of MASAC which ensure that the group has an equal number of
community and industry representatives. This approach renders the group
ineffective and inefficient, and therefore �structural changes to MASAC are
necessary. Mr. Hohenstein noted that in recent years, most airport noise issues of
importance have by-passed MASAC altogether. Those present discussed the
application of the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition model to
other quadrants around the airport. It was agreed that this topic should be further
discussed at an upcoming NDCARC meeting.
NDCARC Meeting Minutes
August 16, 1995
Page 3
Mr. �aweii brought the group up-to-date on the status of the Dual Track Process
and related issues currently being addressed by the Dakota County Board of
Commissioners. On August 22, 't 995, the County's Physical Development
Committee, which is comprised of all Dakota County Commissioners, �met to hear
a pcesentation by a southern Dakota County group apposed to havi�g4 the airport
located in their area. The County Board was asked ta endarse a position opposing
airport relocation and/ar IandbanEcing in Dakota County. Thanks to the� effarts of
Commissioner Bataglia, the Board held off making such a decision to allow cities a
chance to let their concerns be known prior ta the decision being made. The
Physical Development Committee will again discuss this issue on September 26,
1995 at 1.00 p.m.
Mr. Laweli also informed the group of discussions underway between the
Metropolitan Council, the MAC, and the cities of Minneapolis. Bloomington, Eagan,
Mendota Heights, and Richfield on the subject of a Community Protection Concept
Package. The purpose of the package is to assist these cammuni#iss in dealing
with MSP expansion impacts, should a decision be made to expand the airport in
its present location. Many of the community stabilization and redevelopment tools
contained within the draft package would require State approval to make them
available. The draft package currentty makes no mention of aperational changes
which would need to be made to accommodate future airport expansion. Mendota
Neights wi!! be arguing that operational changes are mandatory if th� airport is to
stay put. The group discussed the noise monitoring system in use in Denver+
where monetary fines are tevied for noise #evet viola#iohs: It was the consensus of
the group that the implementation of such a system should be explored at MSP.
Future Meeting Date
The Coalition established Wednesday, September 27, 1995 as the datei of their
next meeting. The meeting will begin at 7:34 a.m. and wiil be held in the City af
Sunfish Lake. As one agenda topic, the CoaGtion members decided to �review the
original list of airport issues for possibte additions, detetions, and reprioritization.
The group then adjourned to the City Council Chamber to video the global
posi#ioning satellite flight approach videotape. �I �
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:�0 a.m.
I
�e����������������������i���i��t��t���1�t111�1t11111111111111111111111ti11�11
—� AUGUST 1995 I��
BUYOUT
UPDATE
issv� 2i
NOTE: As this issue is being mailed the
fourth auct(on is befng conducted at the
Richfteld Legion liall. Thirty-one (31)
houses are to , be auctioned. The
September Buyout Update�will inform
you of money generated, to go bagk tnto
the Part 150 program.
I111111111111111111111111111111�111111111111111111111111111�111111111111�1111111
RICSP'II�LD SUN-CURRENTs INACCORATE property. Once your second appraisal
VALIIS REPORTgD has been completed, the homeowner or
Recently hameowaers within the buyout the appraiser will need to deliver
area have indicated that the Richfield three (3) copies of the apprais�l to
Sun-Current has reported grossly WDSCO. Your consultsnt will arrange to
inaccurate dollar valuea paid for their have both the MACa appraisal attd your
acquired hanes. This data ie listed in �ppraiesl sent to the review appraiser
the Homes And Living section of the for aimultaneoua Ireview. This will
Sua-Current. These errors have caused help to expedite the offer process for
some homeowners to asaume that a each homeowaer. i)
neighbor in the bt�yout area h�ls �
received as much as $16,000.00 more for PH]�SS IIs ]1CQIIi3ITION AND RSLOCATION
their property than they actually CLo82NCi IIPDATS
received. � The acquiaition and relocation cloaing
progresa for thoae haneowners and
Accurate information can b� obtained tenants in Phase I= will continue to be
fram the tax assessora office. Please reported through Ithe Buyout update,
remember that the dollar amounta that until the entire� Phase nears 100�
are recorded for the buyout propertiea completion for all acquiaitioa and
are reflective of the improvement relocation closings. Your�WDSCo team�s
(building) price, plus aay additional goal is`to ensure�each homeowner and
lota (extra lattd) inconnection with the tenant that their closing is conducted
property. � in a emooth snd �itimely manner. To
date, thie goal has been achieved.
PE1,9S III s INITIAL INTSRVISDP PRO(�R8S8 i �
The initial interview prxesa is nearly Ae of August 29, T995, there have been
completed for those hanaowners and a total of 60 acquiaition cloainga
approved hardshipe in Phase IZI. To •coaducted in Phase�ii. The acquiaition
date, 63 iiomeowners have been contacted cloaing procesa iis •now near 85�
and 58 initial interviewa for Phase III completion. InI addition to the
have been conducted. As of August 29, acquisition cloaings, a total of 47
1995, there are etill 3 homeownera homeownera have il clos�d on their
remaining whom WDSCO has not been able relocation homes. This brings the
to coatact to schedule an initial �'elocation cloaing process near 66�
interview. This Auguat iesue of the completion. ;�
Buyout Update will be the last ieaue to i
report the Phase III initisl interview To date, 39 properties in Phase II have
progresa. WDSCO will begin reporting been vacated. The total number of
the acquiaition and relocation offer properties now vacated for both Phase I
statua beginning with the September and Phase II is 182.
iaeue of the Buyout Update. - ',I
P8718$ III t APPRAISIIL IIPDATS PH118S I s DBMOLITION IIPDATS
As of Auguet 29, 1995, the appraisal Bids for both demolition and asbestos
process for Phase III is now 39� abatement were submitted to MAC on
completed. Lyle Nagell Company has Tueaday, Auguat 22; 1995.
completed 26 field appraieal studies ae �,�
of August 29, 1395. WDSCO hae received Ten (10) companies submitted bids for
16 appraisal reporta fran Lyle Nagell the demolition contract. Veit &
Company, and to date, no environmental C�p�Y, Inc., a Minneapolis-based
reporte have been�received fran PSI. demolition company, aubmitted the
' lowest bid and has been chosen by MAC
WDSCO hss forwarded 12 appraieals to staff oa a preliminary baeis subject to
the review sppraisal firm of BCL approval by the Metropolitan Airports
Company. To date, no appraisal Co►taniesion. . �
certificatione have beea received.
Six (6) companies,auhmitted bids for
Please remember to contact your WDSCO the asbestos abatement contract.
consultant if yo� choose to have a EnviroBate Metro, inc., a Twia Cities
second appraisal completed on your based abatement campany, aubmitted the
lowest bid and has�beea chosen by WDSCO
• The Part 150 Buyout Update ie a newaletter by thilMetropolitan
Airports Commisaion and�W.D. Schock Company, Inc., containing
information on the MSP Land Acquisition and Relocation Projects.
• I�
oa a preliminary basis subject to
approval by the Metropolitan Airports
Commisaion. Both bida came in below
the projected budgets aet for
demolition and asbestos abatement for
this Part 150 project.
Both contracts will be reviewed by MAC
with a detexmination made to award both
the demolition and asbeatos abatement
contracta by September 18, 1995. The
demolition and asbestos abatement
process may begin as early as mid-
October.
MAC and WDSCO look forward to the
completion of this demclition proceas
by the end of 1995, however eite
reclamation may continue until the
spring of 1996, depending on weather
conditione. This will decrease the
number of vacant homea within the
neighhorhood and create a park-like
aetting for the remaining homeowners
within the project.
BIIYOUT FEEDBACR
Q.: Will WDSCO help me obtain a
mortgage on my new home?
A.: WDSCO can provide each
homeowner/tenant with a
. resource liat of mortgage
lendera and loan officera to
asaist with financing. However,
there are a.great many lendera
in the Twin Cities area, and
you will need to contact a
lender yourself to obtain the
�� necessary financing. Your WDSCO
team will work closely with
your mortgage loan officer to
provide all neceasary
information regarding your
relocation benefits for
approval purposes. Please
W.D. SCHOCK COMPANY, INC.
'��5844 28th Avenue South
Miaaeapolis, I�i 55417
(612�J724-8898
(800)260-7062
contact your WDSCO consultant
ahould you have any questions
or concerne about applying for
a mortgage or if you are having
difficulty obtaining financing
due to credit or employment
problema. �
Q.: Will WDSCO pay for the expense
to reconnect all my utilities
once I move into my new home?
A. : If a homeowner chose the• actual
moving expenae payment and had
a moving company perform the
actual move, there are certain
one-time utility company
reconnection feea that may be
reimbursable. Theae are the
one-time feea charged for new
service connection. Please
note these fees must be non-
refundable. The homeowner must
pay for these fees and then
forward copiea of thei; paid
utility billa to their WDSCO
consultant for reimbursement.
Gas, electric� telephone and
cable are the most common
companies to charge one-time
fees. If a homeowner muat
incur special charges due to
reconnection of a atove or
dryer, please discusa these
feea with your consultant first
regarding poseible
reimburaement. If a homeowner
chose the fixed moving expense
and conducted the move
themselvea, all �' one-t3:me
reconnection feea that need to
be paid to the utility
companies will be paid by the
homeowner from the lump eum
• moving expense payment they
received to conduct the move.
�
'_. .--._� � «
, �6A,o.'��i.z = =�t
� �� °� i; U`S.aOSiAG� �
Y � AUG--95N ��5��
� /�^ � i b a�`
.`y1N �'��IIN S
.: 3:S yS 33 �__...; •
Tom Lawell
1101 victoria Curve '
Mendota Hghts, NIDi 55118 �—�
�� s ", j .
0
' f�
�r�re�r�aa�sMsa*�ra��raa��a��ar������ra���r���Naa��a�a�raa��N�l�111I/�i�t�{l111
SEF'I`EMBER i995 �
; M j � ! ISSUE 22
QUAR,TERLY PRt3JECT STATUS
(end of September 1945) I I
�T T� �T T� 0 NUIVIBER�F HO�UI 2U0 250L 3005 35�
�..% \�,,,!
UFDATE
PRQJECT STEPS
Camptacd Acquisitians
Campleud Reiocations
Vaeited Pmperties
Houses Moved
Honses Demalished
I�
[��������i�����l�li���������l����l�������E�l������ii������l�����������li��#�!
FOURTB AUCTION CONLIUCTED
MAC, WDSCQ aad Kl�ur Indaadriad Anctiaaars
caaducted the fa�rth pablic anctioa on Wednesday,
Angust 30,1995. Ont of thirty (30} hom�es avaittt6te far
auction. t3iirt5' (30) were sold. The Saund iaaalation
home %ea�ed at 63I4 Stendiah Avenue Sonth was aLsa
inclnded ia this faarth wction, and �id for S23,S80.00.
The Soaad Insala6ioa home ia aot pact of the name A�P
Gtaat as tha haraea acquiied in New Fard Toam aad
Rich Acrea, md is thcr�fon nat inclnded 'm the bota!
aac�oa doflars generatod. Thia anctioa waa the firat in
which i00'/. af tho homas wero sotd.
iianses and Qetached gara,ges were solQ as aae unit, thc
same as tho two previona pubtic auctioaa. Tho iiighest
bid for a home wua S24,OOO.OQ. The bid waa also tha
highes# dallar amaunt rtaliud for aay home ta data,
including the du�ao pmvioas auctiona hold. Tho lowest
bid at this auctioa for s homo w� 525.00, with aa
average price calcalatai at S6,E27.i0 far dt hamcs
parchasad. This fonrth anction u!!so produced the tughest
average purchases pricx of alE fonr auctioas combiaed.
Onco sgain, therv will bo increasted sdaivity ie t%e area
with hanse mcvers be8��8 p�Paratiun fQr s Doambor
28, 1993 deadlino to move the pn�heasod hames and
B�Sss. All sixty-five (63� homes greviowly euctianod
have now been moved fmm tha pnoject as af Saptember
19, 1993. �
'�"� ` As with r,�ch aaction to data, tha S204,825.00 gtneratod
. '_� � J;
.•`Y L:: fmm thia fonrth anction will go b�ck into the fzmding far
..,_...
:''��'�:
;:�;, ihe Part 154 Laud Acqniaitian auu� Retocation Pragram.
�.` This creates additional fnmda for the at an�, whilo
r.�;;. �y3'o
:''� �'� c�oclacing propa�ty maaagrmeat focs aad domolidon coats.
�"�` . Tiie aea# pablic auctiaa will bo schednleci for tha apriag
�' . of 1996.
=m�.. •
iuu�yasot,wcuon oay R�
THE BUYOUT PROJECT
TWQ YEAR'ANrtNERSARY
�I
The New Fo�+d Tawa amd Rich Acres Part iSQ Pmjt;ct
haa now beea in proc�ss i'or two yeaca a of Septem'btr
21, 1995. MAC and � WDSCO caatinna to woik
diligea#ty to enscu+e aach hom�awnt�a aad teaaa�s
acqni�ition and rolocatioa pmcwa ia condnctod ia a
carin8, Professional aad '� aly maaner.
i
This Stptembtr iasae af the Hrtyont Update arGport� the
cuirent quarteriy stataa gragh af varians activities for the
thitd qaerter of 1995 (aa graph above). Within the nczt
thirtY (9q) day�, the rcmainiag Phaso [II fnnding atatus
shauid bo dctecmiaed. Oace that @etGrmiaation is made,
the ability to incorporate Priority 16, aad inalndo thase
hameownaa as part of the Phase BI aeqaisition and
reiocatioa ptcceas wilt allslo be deteamined.
If the cumnt fiwding tz�te �continnea, MAC aad WDSCt?
aaticipate ail acqnisitiona to bo camptebed wit'�ia the 3.S
Y� P�.lected time frame:
�� �
PHASE III; ACQUISTTI4N AND
RELOCATIqN
Maay Phase IIf ham�ownem ane consiaeciag haviag a
sxond appraiaal dono on their property. WDSCO
cncaurages �ach homeowner to coatrect with tha
appzaiaGr af yanr choice st appmximaDely tho aame tim�
the MAC appraisal is being complobed. Obtaining a
sa;aad sggreisal affords 'each hameawaer tha ability to
obtaia two appraisers' opinions for tha markat valne of
their pmpeity. Both tppiansala cm t3�en bo aeat ta the
z+eview a�praisar at tho same time. The review appiaiser
will thcn certif'y which appraisal mom accurtttoly zetlacts
the mmice! vaiva af the' givperty. The:z is aa r�ai
financiel beaef"it to waiting nntii yoar �ittcn offer has
baa presentad bo kam� in yoar �a�ond tppraisal.
+�F��Y arith ngard to yaar ntocstioa 6taefita. Pla�sa
aote thet the compareble home aelecood tn detamine
your Rclocatioa Eligibility ia saflectivo of tha fnnctional
chmac�a�a of eac� homeowae�s actaai hamo, aad aat
the appraised valae of W� hame.
As of Septcmbor 2I, 1493, the appraisal procxss for
Phme III is naw 82'/� comploted. To data, 54 fiold
apgraisai s#udies havt beea eampietad by Lyie NageU
The Part 150 Bayont Update ia a newstetoer by the Meuropolitan Aicports Commissioa aad W.D. Schack
Compaay, Inc.; cantaining infocmation on the MSP Gand Acquisition and Rolocation Pcojxts.
��
Campany. Lyle Nageil Companp haz fonvardcd 37
campictcd a{sprusai rcpacu ta t6c o�zce of WDSCO. As
af Saptember 2!. 1493, WDSCQ has received 38
environmental repc►ns completed by PSI.
WF3SC0 has focaruded 36 apprsisat ceports tu tha
cevicw appraisa! fum of $CL Appraisals, Iac. Tu date,
13 appraisal ccr 'h�ications have baen c+eceivod.
Offer procesa �aa�
T6is Saptcmber issne of the Buyaut Updat� wilt begin
reporting the nnm6er af affers preseated aad the genceat
of +rll those offo�s acccpted for homsowaars in Phase lII.
Ptea4t remember each hameowncr will havo aixtY i�)
dsys to consider aad secept their writtea offer. Qace the
offer has becn �ccepted ia writia�, tha a�cqoisitioa
closing wiil be schedaled for aPPro��3' �Y i�a)
daya fmm tha dste of acceptaaca. Shouid there be m
urgeat aad ta coadact a alosing ia less dua thiriY day:,
pl�ase notify your WDSCO team consultank Evcry
effart wiIl be made ta accommodatC tiuis ahochx time
frame.
As of September 21, 1995, 4 offtr meetings hava bcen
heid, with 3 hameowneca accopting their qffaia.
The acquisitiaa and relacation ela�ing pracesa far thase
homeocvaas aad toaaat� in Ph�sse III ia aaw aader wsy.
The fust Phaao III acqnisition and relocation alosin�s m
sFhedut�d for September 29,1995. The October istaa of
t}ic Buyant UpcEa#o will btgia report3ng all acquisitian
and nlocatiaa closia� siaciatica.
PHASE II: ACQUISITIUN A1�tD
RELOCATION
�Iosin , U�date•
Tha acquisitian c2osing praccss for thase hamoawuens is�
Phase II is now 91Y• camplzio as of tLia Sepumber isane
of tho Buyout Updmte. As of September 21,1995, thero
have bcen a taW of 64 acquisition cIoain� conductod.
Tha rolocatioa clossn� pmcess is now ?U'l• comgkte,
with a totnt of 49 Phase II homeowaen aho have closed
on tfieir nlocatian hamea. Ta dato, 44 praperties in
W.D. SCHC�CR COMPANY, INC.
_ -p5844 2$TS AVBN�3E StJUTB
rsn��z,�s, Mr�r �s��.�
{612�724-8$98
(800)260-?Q62
Phaso [I hace been �•acated. The total aumber of
praperties.now vacatod foc bodt Phase t iad Phase it is
187.
It is very imporkaat for eac6 homwwncr to notify their
Wam coasu[taat si�cutd the date ar time of their
schedulai ratocatioa closing change. Relocatioa fuads
as well ms the requic+ed FAA Cleim Eotms must bt
deTivered the day of the homeowaet'a �tocatioa closing,
to the schaiuted tido compaay. Eseh cansultaat caa thea
makc suzo that relacatioa funds are dcliveted on time,
aad the celocation closing pmcess is completed in a
smooth aad timety manner. '
PBASE I: DEMOi.ITION,i'ROGRESSES
{}n Maaday, Stpumber IE� I993, the MetropoGtac►
Aicporta Cammisaion approva! tt� cant�acts for both
damolitioa and asbasaoz abatement tabmiaed foc ntview
by WDSCO. Veit dt Company, Inc., witl ptxfozm aii
rtquired� daaotiriaa activiria for t�e vacsat Phue i
homes in New Forj! Towa and Ricb Ac�s. EavimB�ds
Metra: Tnc. wiU perfoim all the n�ce.t�cy ubesW�
nbatemeat far eech home priur W ies demotitiea.
,As zegocted ia the Angust isssie of t3�a. Baycut Updaic,
tho a�besto: abatemcnt aad domolitioa activily aall be�in
in mid Octaba: The Octabdr usae of the Buyout
Updaza will kap esc3� hamoowntr npdxted s= esch
ptvicess prograsses.
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
'[`he Octo6cr dnmp�tta� availa6iUt1 data are.
SatNrday. Oetober "f.1995, and Satnrda�. Odobar 21.
1995. fram 4:00 a.m. to S:i10 p.m,
BUYOUT FEEDBACK
��
Q. Do i hadb ta taka mY apPtiacc,os whea I vacatsa
my homa? � �
A.� it is nat aeccasary w take a1l of yonr spplimcw,
if yon do IIat wmat them, if yast Qo aoi wit6 w
movo them to yonr aaw homa or ay to eoQ
them, Yau may leave them behind. Pleaso lat
your WDSCO team coaauitaat kaow yonr
dccision, so the Froperty Managemart tesm mry
be notifiod if applianr,a m+o gain� to nmaia in
the home.
L..._... —� i�=�='-.::��: �.J.' `
�.��Qa.,r,wG.,v.� .: ....._.�"1.`�
� a. pr`'""" /.^(J.S.�U�iAGE�;
� SEP--'9S N ��'J�;� .2 2 ���
� �''� �
:4.MiiCS y r *
?��N a.:scaa-s -
Tom Lawe11
1101 Vi.^,toria Cuxve .
Menclata Fights, MN 55118
-, . .. . . . . !
�
. �
� Annual Membership , ' ' ��'�� . �%., � ��J /���//� �i
�25.40 � "`7„` t
.�� Ma�� �he� �aye�,� to� � Natianal Helicopter Noise Coalition (NHNC)
;. � Homeowners of Encino , i
..:: Y- �o �ox zaa2os � E,�� L��� E R
Encino, CA 91428
�..... •.
�!
Number 5 � Encino, Califomia ;` September 1995
..�.
•':�� �
;�:;:
.�:�
� i::�.
.;r:% �
:��� .
';:�:
�'.;s�
::�;: .
:s�o-: '
,�,�,�; :
.:;; ;.,
"�i :`
•%�5::
. s:� �.
.'Y.'.t .
'.'J.
..� • .
:'�` ;
;'�;°
::� = ,
,':C �.Y
."_'� `
.�.;�.
�:r �
';;:,, '
�
,{
FAA AGREES TO RECONSIdER HELICOP'�ER
MINIM�M AL1'ITI�dE--Wi�11'E 1'0 F�1�A TI�dAY#
� ,
As a result of a petitian Sled by clustering af inedia helicopters at aperate as often as desircd. it wouid
klomeowners of Encino, tlte FAA crime scenes, accidents, etc. also place no limits on itinerant aircraft
b�s a�ed to ae�aside; a peti- If the FAA faila ta approve the ru2e comin,g in for cheep fuel, acrvice and
tioa #ha�t wou2d �tabttsh a 1000' chaxige, tht pub2ie will be unpro- eve of the�aircr�aftl�eaa ofage or noise
minimam �Itttnde tor helioop- tected from the aoise and safety �oa even the watcrad doaa aon•ad-
ters flyla� over coa�ested u�as. ' hazards of low flying haiicopiers. At Qition 8tage 2 measure is beiag �n#-
Fiameawt�ers of Encinds getition present there are na minimum atti- ted. Jet operators want to expand their
for a rule change was denied on tudes for helicopters. Pilots can fly fleet of older jets. Thcy have threatened
June $, l99S, but will now be at any a2titude they deem safe, re- to sue, and this is the anly raccusa that
reconsidertd b,y David Hinsarn, FAA g�e� of the noise and other en- Mayar Riordan needa. we are toid by
Administrator. vironmental impacts on residents. reliable sources that Mayor Riordan is
The xcconsideration reoptns the Every resident and elected off:cial•is �hind the effort to kill ihe non-additian
issue, at�d ailouns residents dir�hxrbed urged to write to the FAA taday. • of srage 2 noisy �ecs at van Nuys Ais-
by helioopter noise to appeal, di- � port, regardless of what the residents
rtc#ty tize FAA's tag adsainistrstor. 11AN llifYB AORPQR"�' OFQATE ��G �'he word on the strset is "�ill
tt is crutaal to atreas safety iesues The L.A. Board ofA' �e non�dditiaa rnle at Vaa Ruys
, , u�portCommission- �
r�ther than merely rAising noise 'era met on JuYy 25, 1995, in Van Nuys, ��°� it axty cost! To hell aith the
matters on the reconsidezatian. after ayear and a hs2f of inactian an the �i4ent s aompleiats! The Aizpost is
A 60 day comment period 'began Van Nuye AicpQrt Noisc I2egutatian. Many g°od for busiuess, and tiiat s al2 #htit
rroaidenta at4ended the m demand- constts. ,
an August 23, 1995, when the re- �� Unless Commission PresidentTed Sxin;
�o�����gQ � p�� ��� ing heficoptor curfewa and a Naise �ity Attamey Jim Hahn and Jack Dris-
Fedtral Registe� [60FR43726j. Wrtt- Regu2ation thak wan3d ban edding any coll,AirportExecutivaDirector, takeac-
ten oo�antaenb will be accepted more Stage 2(read noisy, outdated jets) �an Ca approve the non-addition rule,
by the FAA, nnti2 t2te c%se af the from using trec airQort Alao attending ��re will be a substantisl increase in
the meeting were many pilata and pra- nois S` e g y
woriia,�dayoaOctober23,199b. a�g�on interesta that aupport airport �uncilman M carvin BraudC's lack of
Elected offici&ls, individuals and expanaion and oppose effective noise ;tadership leaves much to bc desired.
oTgani2aLions must again write 2et cantmLs. A battte lxtween the rights af He refuses ta a
ters in support of the 1000' mini- residents and the aviaHon Jcorporate jet PPo�x gomeonc who rap-
mum for heliCopters. A massive iatereet is at hand. resents aesociations made up of resi-
amaunt af letta�s and phnnt Calls ta �n ����' �. 1992, the Cammissian- ��nts living sauth of the airport to the
Mastcr Plan Advisory Committee.
the FAA will send a mes.sagC, that �ra approved a Noisc Regulation that Mayor Ftiordan's{pppularity has fallen
would have aet a mexicnum naise limit
the rights and conce:rns of those af ?? dBA far arrivais �nd departures from 73%o to aniy 44°fo with Valiey resi-
on the graund matter as muoh as dents. Riordan, Hahn and i3raude aza
those of inedia ai sight sFeing heli- ��°een 7 a.m. and iQ p.m. and hase �lupfbrieelection. Iftheyaretowin re-
copters.Don'tdelay,writetoDoCket ��e noisy Stage 2 jets over several election; they will nesd Valley and hiU-
yeara. {He2icopters werc nat included in side votes. A black mark beeause af air-
2?371 todayf theregutation.jButaRcranewoommis- �
���1� m� �+�� �� sion waa puf in place by Mayor Naiordan, P°rt aoise cauld cost them the election.
Federal Avfatian Admiaistr�►tioa they rtscsnded the ectiori, an a mation H�° is.ahRt must be done-demand
Qf!%e of the Chlef C4usisel by fied Stein, Commisaion Preaident. �at the non•additian of Stagc 2 jets be
Attas Rales Docket Ifo. Z7371 The aM►iatioa lobb� lutd Ha�os Rior- Put inW place immedia.telyt-call or writc:
daa exesclsed nadne controt over'the Richard Riosdua, M*�os� 20p N. Spri»g
800 Iadapeadeaoe Are., S.W. . SL, LA, CA 90di2, {213j485-33I2
Wnsh. DC 2059i Cammiesion at the July 2S, 3945,
Phone 202 Z67-9677 meeting. Ratherthanapprovetheprcvi- '� HR}ia, C�t� Attasae�, 1800 City
$tress eafety issues related to low °us Naiet R ��,��gpAC Pres.,t i1Warsid Wayg
egulation, as promised, and
phaae aut nosay Stage 2 jeta, tha Com-
flying heticopters, the recent crash LA CA 90009, (310j646-6263
misaionets only apprwed a wabere+d dovan
irt the Cahuenga Pass ia LA, the non-addition nile. This supposedly would Jadc Llrlseoll, I.ADOA �.SoecDir., 1 Workl
numeraus crashes of Sight seeing � a���g marc naisy Stage 2 jets to Way, LA, CA 90009, (310}546-6250
he2icapters in Hawai's, tht unsafe the Aeet, but aUow existiiig nois eta ta �'�4�n Bsaud°' C°un°iim�a' 200 N'
�J SPring SC, LA,CA 90Q12 (81$)756-8150
��' ` ����ir�w����������w��w��iw���w��? ��.w�
��`'�F2ease join us, and hetp with the cost of this mailing and in our efforts to limit helicapter and jet noise. �
� �'�to� �ie Nc:%e! ("�' �I/V!) r� I � I
E National Helicopter Noise Caalition (NHNC) +
� ✓ Ye�c, I want to helgi ❑ New Meniber� 0 Reriewat I
��
� Please make your check for $25.00 payable to:, Homeawners of Encino-Noise �
� Mail to: PO Box 260205, �ncino, CA 9�1426 j I �
� Name � � G I
I Address II �
� City " State Zip �' Phcine i
L,�.._��_____..--�__.,__._—_._.—_..___..._—.�._— -'---^--'---'!
���
2
NHNC and STN! NEWSLE7TER
!QFlER t4YttS'i tAl� RESIQEMTS
A helicopter tour company has
Ureen doing businass at 'Burbank
A,isport for just oxze w+eatc, but ai-
ready has residents complaining
about naise and intrusion into thcir
privacy, officials saict.
KF' Aviation began offering 35
minute helicopter ridas aver Bur-
bank, and the northeast sectaion of
Los Angeles last week, but Burbank
CouncilmanTed McConkey saidhis
constituents are startitig ta com- ,
plaiti..,
"We received several complairtts
about noise and intrusions af privacy,"
said McCankey, lt's s qucstian of noise
and eafety. Do we want them flying
aver residentisl neigtiborhoods when
their anly purpose is aightseeing?"...
Koye Fernandez, the preaident of ICF
Aviation, inaiated that his helicopters
have not been havering over anyone'a
property...
«y�le hev� designed a syatem that ia
sefe and that is neighborly and tttat is
af�eient,"Fernandez said. "itws�i not be
changed by anY bureaucrat My busi-
neaa ie carrying the tourista of Los
Angetea. No counciiperson or Angeleno
i:a going to atap me."... '
'You don't necd tn get pernnia�aioa to
use the airwqya,' he said. "It'a like
drivirtg an the 101 freeway. The airpnrt
authority is not who wa ans'wer to. We
follow what thc FM eaya•"
Through ib "Angcl'a E�+e View," KP`
takea partios af ug to four geopie in a
1�twin-jet helicopur on a tour over Uni-
venai Studios, through tise Cehuen8e
Paaa, over Hollywood antl the Wil:hire
Diatrict mnd paat the akyscnpert dawn-
taveci.
jArUck sriortcned end �eprtntcd froa► the
Oaily News, 8/iiJ95)
EleCted of#icials.'ladivldnals
W1� Olj�triiZ��OAf •�IlIIft l,�tt
wrtta letteis �ia suppart of a
tbe 100G' miaimnm for hell-
copters. A massive �uaonnt of
Ietters and phoae c�its ta thc
FM are necded. Doa't dalaq.
Rrite tod�►yi
. i."O7J21ltEllt� tt2U#L i�tE iE3'iZ b0:
Faderat Avlatioa Ad�n
Oftias of tlie Chlef Conasei
Attas Rn2es Doc%at No. �73?I
800 Iadependeaoe A�a., B.W.
W,�sh.� DC. 20591 '
Phane (202j-267-967'7
1995
�H�ce��s �o���H� ���� �� � FRpM tHE SENATOR...
Rre are nawori the Interr.fet. Ifyou A��� 4r ��$
haye aa e•mail addr�ss. and want. s Mr. Barry Stokes; Ci�. Against Noisc
' to•receiva no-char�e32;ielicoPttr :. . P.O. Box 36�Volcaao, HI 96'785
updates. ple;ase sendaddress Yo; .�h� y�,u for cantacting me re-
�silva�,�cello.�ina.+�alntwtes•edu ��ding the poseiblc ramificatiana af
, the pasasge of regutatory.r�form leg-
�OPlERlOyRS QPPOS�O ,. ��lation on the air tour induatry.
The atate'e tour helicopter industry . As You maY know, the Senate re-
is hopefulthe.FMwillre�}uceits 1,5.00�',� centty apent Il daya coasidering S.
R min.ilight ckvati�s; Fiui Citizens Against ` 343; the Gamprehensivc Regulatory
Noise want it increased, to two miles. Ftetortp. Act of 1995� introduced by
� Bath'reacfe� to a Nationai'i`��tispor- :• �Seri. Majonty I.r,�der Robert Dale (R-
tation Safaty Board report lasi vaee'k an KSj: Ifl the en@. Sen. i?ole wa:�s foreed
the U.B. air tour industry. It made dr ta pull the biU ftom thc IIoor after a
tailcd recdmmandations for making third cloture vate failed, aad it ap-
sat�r air tour operationa 6y helicopters p�ed �t neither propon�nUs or
and fixed wing aircrait.: .' � opponenta di the' meaaure had the
The isaua rhat h,as r�ised the most ��� ��ntroT #toor actian.'
concern in Hawaii has bcen the FM's Hawever, duririgconsideration of the
apcc;at �uy�g iaat year that wur, rn�u�� �ro amendmentm were
aircraft maintain a 1,5t?Q-fboi ctevatian �op� arhich cautd pote�tislty af-
andatand-offdistancefromthegrouad. fect the sir tour indu�try and the
Th�t maaas a heiicapter must be �plemtntationof SFAR-71.OnJuly
i,auo t,iy�es thaa tthe �rouae ar,.a�er � 1, ��ss, chc screate saaptaa {s3-as)
below, and at leaet f,5Q0 laterally ���ndment introduc�edbySen.J.
frarn any land, such ea a� c2iff cr valley �nnett Johriaon (D-iJ►) which woutd
wall... Citlzens A�aiait Aoise, said r usre cneieaYoundertakeriskas-
thRt a+�ea at 1,E00 feet, �Ehe uaiso acsaments, cost-benefita enalyaes>
Erom ttiur tiraxatt is excassiva.
'The minimum aitihide and stasxdoif ��►d athcs proceduraa aniy far thoae
distances for taur aircraft shouid be e�daLing rcguiationa with an annual
increaaed ta two miles (or 1�q,560 feetj," e�onomic ca:st of � 100, muillion, r�ther
aaid CAN'e Barry Stokea. •. .. thar► the �50� millian in thc bill. In
�prtscks, stxsrte�ud, rcpsintat finm 'iy� additian, the Sezsaicadopted {60-36}
Honnbdu Adveniseq d/.7(95J � Elll amendment introduced by Sen.
PLEASE 30lN AMp BEC4M� � Nunn (D-C3A) which wouId re-
quirt fedcrai agencies io c�nduct cast
AMO A!ilYE NEMBER benefit. , anmlyaea ,ancl �othef proc�-
Join NHNC/Stop the Noisel by �'�� ��� for ariy .ttgvlation
sending a checY for $25:00 payable �at haa a signifecant ecanomic im-
ta Hom�eows�ets of EnciatrNoise, P.O. l�ct on a aubstantia! numbcr of �maU
Box 260205, Enr.ino, CA 91426. We �u'��' �; ��O �'� aO�
not mect thc bill a threahold for over-
, need your financisl support to' pay ���ct an the nation'a economy.
forasrailingsofthisncwsletters,.aad A� auch, it ia conceivabte that SFAR
for the coet of postage, P��B ��' ? i couid bc axcnipted frozn compli-
telephone calls. ' ancc deprndin,� upon the interpreta-
Ouar members work on locai and � af S. 343. '
national noise isssues by attending A�� ���0 f4f C4ritetCtiti$ IDC.
h��r�xy88� speakin8 btf re grouPs, ` I appreciate your taking the time to
an�i cammu�n�ng �� � ahare.you thoughts on thie importa.nt
A11 wor]c is do�e by vohaaGeexs. P1�.ase iasue. If i may be of further asaia-
sead a check today and assiat us in ��, please let me know.
cantmllingthe sgreadafhalicopter A2oha gnmehana, .� •�
II078C. �i�i �iII� �0111d IIOt jf0 I?ANISrL F{. AiiAli�ie' BCII. �Fi/lW��}
possible withont halp fro�t PeoPk' M���AM MYYS �AIRP011i ���
such as yon. The more money we I MOISE �OMPWIR MOMBER: �
IECCiYC�themorefrequentourmait � I 800 660-0010
ings, .and tlie greater aumber of � � �
peaple we cau nach. .', $c�r. t,hi+ nur�b�z�znd�catt 41�-�
� �...+.,:.�.�.�.,-�.�..��...-i��s�����',���w�J
- �� #� /V�! ('�'�N!,� �
Nafional Helicopter Noise Coali#ion {NHNC)
� PQ Box 2b0205, Encino, CA 91Q�26
: �
Impor�an� Newsle�er!!! � �
FAAAGREES!"0 RE�OlISIOER __: _
HELt��M'ER MtNiMYM ALlttYQE GITY
WR11'E �0 TNE EAA TO�iAY! i io i�
MElti1D
• t3'u�H_''�,��,
� �,.
• � �
,� . j
. � �ALt�s- f
OF t1ENDO7R tiETGliTS
=NSOTTO, CHARLES E.
VICTORIA CURVE ,
3iA MN 55118-4i67
�
�
NORTH�RN aA��TA �OUI�T�Y
. �a
AIRPC3RT RELATIONS COALITiON
,
Cities of Eagan, inver Grove Heights, Mendota,
Mendota Heights and Sunfish �ake
September 1, 1995
MARR SALMEN
MANAGER, AIRPORT OPERATIONS
NQRTF3�WEST ASRLINES
N731Q .
5101 NORTHWEST DRIVE
�t�t`�t'v, ru: ��iii-3v� s
Dear Mr. Salmen:
Thank you for you letter af July ? regarding issues about noise
abatement depar�ure proiiles raised by the Northern Dakota County
Airport Relations Caalition. The process which you outlined for
airport selectian of departure prafiles is extremely helpful�and
Coalition cities intend to participate in it. !�
1
However, the purpose af our initial letter was to discuss the
assumptions of �rie profiles�themselves, rather than the pracess.
When Advisory Circular 91-53A was being developed, a�aany of us
believed that it would represent an apportunity for airlines to
better utilize noise compatible areas, such as the corridor at MSP,
to the benefit of distant communities and neighborhoods down range
fram airpar�Gs. As such, we had expected that the preexi�,sting
Northwest noise abatement departure prafile would be designated as
fihe cicse-in procedure and that a new distant procedure would be
developed and analyzed. I�
�
We realize tha� the purpase of the Advisory Circular is to
standardize and reduce the number of depar�ure gr4cedures around
#he United States. We know that there are means of better using
the perfarmance of aircraf�, especially Stage III aircraft, to
climb more rapid3y than the NADP'.s permit. In areas where noise
compatible land use exist, steeper departure profiles may present
the opportunity of reducing impacts far substantial popuiations.
We understand that where noise compatible land use does �not exist,
t�here is benefit in a no�.se abatement departure procedurek like t�hat
used by Northwest for more than twenty years. Where naise
campatible land use is avai2able, such procedures mayi actually
underutilize the noise abatement potential of those uses and result
in aircraft being unnecessarily law and intrusive when they
inevitably need to leave the noise compatible area. ;�
Getting and keeping aircraft higher is likely to reduce the
population impacted by noise and reinforce Northwest's reputation
as a front-runner in the use of noise abatement techniques and make
it an even better neighbor to all of the communities it serves.
As a consequence, we ask that Northwest revisit the assumptions on
which the proposed distant and close-in procedures were designed
and that we be involved in the review process. We look forward to
discussing this matter more fully. For your convenience, you may
again direct your reply to Mayor Egan, City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot
Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122.
Sincerely,
�` ' `/1i .
��..� �, l���
� Tom Egan Charles Mertensotto
City of Eagan City of Mendota Heights
�' e Atkins
ity of Inver Grove Heights
Jim Toye �
City of Mendota
�
Frank Tiffany
City of Sunfish Lake
cc: John Dasburg, NorthWest Airlines
Sandy Grieve, MAC
Robert Johnson, MASAC
Richard Anderson, Northwest Airlines
Clay Foushee, Northwest Airlines
John Kern, Northwest Airlines '
David Jacobs, Northwest Airlines
. c w �• t at
CITY OF MENDOTQ HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 4, 1995
TO: Airport Relations Commission Members
FROM: Tam Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Discuss Mendota Heights MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs
Sfiatement. I
I
�
DISCUSSION
At our tast meeting the Commission discussed the status of the IMSP Airport
Area Community Protection Cancept Package, and the need to define Mendota
Heights' position relative to our current and long term air noise mitigation needs.
During our discussion, the Commission members outiined a number of operationat
changes they ses as necessary, especially if the State eventually makes the
decision to expand MSP in its current tocatian. j#
Attached please find a four page document enfitled "City of Men�do#a
Neights - MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs" which seeks to capture� the
thoughts expressed at our last meeting. A draft of this document was "reviewed
by the City Council on September 't 3th, after which Council member Smifih and 1
finalized the needs statement. On September 14th, the document was� farm�lly
submitted to the MSP Communities Group working on`the Community Pratection
Concept Package.
The needs statement, although short in length, provides a very j
comprehensive statement of those items judged mast important to Mendata
Heights in its campaign against air noise. Because the needs statement will likely
guide a number of our future air noise mitigatron e�F�forfis, I fett it was important to
for us to spend some time on October 11 th discussing, and perhaps fine tuning,
some the elements contained within the statement. i�
The statement was broadty written so that other Northern Dakota County
cities could buy into the stated objectives. The Northern Dakota County Airport
Relatians Coatition will discuss this possibitity at a special meeting they have catled
for October 13th. � �
� s • �
TF�e Commission should discuss the attached MSP Airpart Noise Mitigatian
Needs statement, and should offer any comments and/or revisions. This matter
will be discussed by the NDCARC at their upcoming 4ctober 13th meeting.
�
CITY GF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MSP AIRPQRT NC?!SE MITIGATlQN NEEDS
As a community directly and severely affected by aiccraft operations at
Minneapolis-St, Pau! Intemationa! Airport {MSP), the City of Mendota Heights is
very concerned ovec the futuce confguration and operation of the airp�ort. � As part
of the Duai Track Airport Planning Praeess, the City has been approached by the .
Metropolitan Councii to discuss ways in which our community is impacted by the
airport, and strategies for mitigating these impacts. j
The MinneapolislSt. Paui Area Community Protection Concept Package
prepared by the Metropotitan Council represents the producfi of these discussions
and attempts #o provide a number of tools and techniques by which Mendota
Heights and other nearby communities witt be abie to address airport retated
impacts. The City of Mendota Heights supports the adoption of the Metropolitan
Councit Community Protection Package based upon the following justification of
need and operational considerations. I
I
As the number of MSP aircraft operations has grown, air noise impacts
within Mendota Heights have increased dramaticaUy. Many o# the noise im acted
areas within our City are older residential area built in t e 1940's, 50''s and 60's
=- which clearly pre-date #he surge in air traffic exper�enced at MSP during #he
1980's and 90's- As a result af increased no�se exposure, these older Mendota '
Heights residen#ial neighborhoods have experienced disinvestment and �decline. in
order to s#abilize #hese areas and maintain their viability, the use of pmperty vatue
guarantees, tax credits for housing rev�tat�zation, aggressive sound insutatior�
programs, and other described community stabilization programs is necessary and
warranted. ��
i
Residential neighborhoods potentially elig�ble #or these programs �, inctude
the Furlong Additron atong State Trunk Highway 55, Curtey Addition aiong
Lexington Avenue, Rogers Lake Addition atong State Trunk Nighway 149, Friendly
Hills Addition aiong State Trunk Highway 149, and ofiher scattered neighborhoods
tocated in identified noise impacted areas. ��
I
Revitatization of industrial properties within the City's Business Park will
similarly require substantiai resources over time. In order to maintain tfie long
term economic health of this area, the City Council would consider the �selective
use of community stabilization and revitalization tools described in the Community
Protection Concept Package. �
I
I
�
City of Mendota Heights
MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs
Page 2
The Community Protection Concept Package also discusses a number of
airport protection measures designed to prevent incompatible land devetopment in
airport impacted areas. As a community incorporated in 1956 and comprehen-
sivety ptanned in 1959, the City of Mendota Heights has a number of established
land use patterns which limits its ability to make sweeping tand use modifications
for the sake of airpart .expansion. For instance, the City of Mendota Heights is
aire�dy 94-95% devetoped. Nonethetess, the City of Mendota He�ghts has for
many years cooperated with the Metropolitan Council in adapting and enforcing
land use controls related to the airport.
in 1987, the City of Mendota Heights became the first and only city to
adopt the Metropolitan Council's Aircraft Noise Attenuation OrdBnance and has
strenuousty enforced the Metropolitan Counci['s Guidelines far Construction Within
Aircraft Noise Exposure Zones. In addition, the City has made a concerted effart
#o limit the total number of new residential units located in areas overflawn.by
aircraft, and has experienced substantial costs in support of litigation to achieve
#hese gaals.
The City #akes seriausly its responsibility to control the development of
noise incompatible land uses within Me�dota Heights. As such, the City doss not
support the creation of another regulatory body, such as the Airport Zaning Board,
to usurp the land use authority vested in our duly elected public officials. If
"teeth" are to be put into the enforcement of land use patterns, #he cities �
themselves should be the enforcing authorityr not som� distan#, �on-representative
board such as the Airport Zoning Board.
This is nat to say that the Legislature, the Metropolitan Airports
Gommission, and the Metrapolitan Council do not have important rotes to play in
regulating air noise generation and exposure. If MSP is to continue to exist in its
present location, it is essential that "testh" also be put into the regulatrons
affecting the operation of the airport. Long term community compatibility with
MSP is premised on the fo[towing:
1} Ti�e aiccraft departure corridor should be �arrawed over Mendota Heights
and Eagan to take full a`dvantage of the latest air traffic cantrol technology.
The introduct�on of a Global Pasitianing Sate[[ite navigation system at MSP
in Fall 1995 should greatly improve the safety of airspace management, and
will alsv lessen the distance aircraft need to be separated ftom one another
to ensure passenger safety. Other precision air traffic control advancements
on the horizon wilt onty help the MAC and FAA better utilize #he airspace
surrounding MSP to minimize air noise impacts �over� residentia! areas.
• _>
City of Mendota Heights
MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs
Page 3
2) The inequitable reliance on the Mendota Heights/Eagan corridor �should be
eliminated. The capacity of the corridor is finite, and communities
overflown by aircraft using the corridar ought not be expected to er�dure air
� noise exposure beyond a fair limit. All communities surrounding � MSP
receive signi�cant economic benefit from its close proximity. Si,milarly, all
should be expected to bear a reasonabEe and equitable share of the
� associated noise burden as well.
;
3) Over the Mendota Heights/Eagan area, depar.ting aircraft should be directed
to utilize, to the fuiiest extent passibie, iess noise sensitive areas, such as
industrial park property and highway rights of way. These areas have been
� planned in canformance with existing and approved airport runway
con�igurationsr are in con#ormance with Metr�politan Gounci! guidetines,
and have been approved by the Metrapotitan Council. To fully accomplish
this goal, aircraft during non-busy hours should be directed to fly a crossing
pattern in the corridor, rather than being given departure headings which
overfly close-in residential areas. This crossing procedure during non-busy
times has been approved by the Metrapolitan Airports Commission and is
� currentiy awaiting imptementation by the Federal Aviation Adminis�t�ratian.
I� ,
4} Once modified to take advantage o# the tatesi air traffic control iechnology
and adjusted to correct for air noise distributional inequities, the boundaries
of the aircraft departure �nd arrival corridors shou[d be specificalty defined,
and air naise exposure standards should be established along this corr�dar.
�• Aircraft operators violating these standards should be subject to; �substantial
monetary fines� ' y put �n o p
Denvec (nternationa Air{�tt.,. �
5i Nighttime aircraft restrictions shoutd be put inta place immediatety to ensure
that only Stage III quieter aircraft are flown between the hours of 11:00
p.m. and 6:04 a.m. Such restrictions should be mandatory and �violation of
the standards should result in a monetary fine to the offending air carrier.
6} Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (related #o how quickly a�ircraft gain
attitude upon departure� should be, reviewed and adjusted to ensure that the
full pertormance capabititiss of Stage 111 aircraft are being utilized. The
abitiiy of these aircraft to rapidly gain altitude, thereby minimizing aircraft
noise levets experienced on the ground, should be quantified and made part
of air traffic d�parture procedures at MSP. �
I
I
.
I
':�n C;,y
City of Mendota Heights
MSP Airport Noise Mitigation Needs
Page 4
7) In its MSP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC has identified a future runway
construction project located on the west side of the airport property. This
new North/South runway, if built, is expected to accommodate air traffic
needs well beyond 2020. The face of aviation will be considerably different
by that time and will hopefully include later generation aircraft which will be
substantially quieter than the current Stage III quiet aircraft, and high
precision air traffic control technology which will ensure safe airspace
management with a minimum of aircraft separation. With this in mind, the
MAC should commit that any airport expansion identified in subsequent
MSP Comprehensive Plans will be "noise-neutral", meaning that no new
noise impacts over residential areas will be generated off of the airport
property as a result of the future addition of new runways.
8) Also related to the MSP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC should establish
measurable criteria by which the performance of MSP is to be judged in
deciding whether or not airport expansion is warranted: These performance
criteria should be frequently and regularly reported to allow interested
�a . parties to monitor the need to undertake the improvements described in the
Comprehensive Plan.
�
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 4, 1995
TO: Airport Relations Commission Members
FROM: Tom Lawell, Cifiy Administr
SUBJECT: Discuss GPS Presentation Scheduled for October 25, 1995
. I
�
DISCUSSION i
�,
Several months ago the Commission received a presentation from
Mr. John Foggia, MAC, and Mr. Hal Pierce, Honeywell, on the capabilities and
implementation schedule of a Global Positioning Satellite system at MSP. Those
present found the presentation interesting and informative and it was suggested
that this presentation be scheduled for an encore before a broader audience, the
Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition (NDCARC), and associated air
noise commissions. �
�
I
I have confirmed with Mr. Foggia the date of Wednesday, October 25. 1995
at 7:00 p.m. for the presentation. The location will be at Mendota Heights City
Hall.
_ {
Although our Commission has already seen the presentation, the meeting
will serve as a good opportunity for us to meet those who are active on airport
related issues from Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota and Sunfish Lake. We
have invited to the meeting all Air Noise Commission members, and other
interested parties, from the five cities which make up NDCARC. j�
ACTION REQUIRED
Check your calendars to see if Wednesday, October 25, 1995 is open for
you to attend the GPS presentation, and meet members of the other airport
relations commissions. � � � �
��
,� V �+"''•� �tlines.
goein9i2�.�13C of A�iana Af9han A t�
'"--` . ^' --•".
� ����..
medium-�nge MO�te { r
/'�l�:...-,xs� a.. ..w
i•"'-�.� Boein9-s Sh°� W as developed to �
pteS adyancedwin9 h Speee Se isin9
�j N dassic ai�iinefs. ali�tudeihig • w�ng
H1StorY a� the w°r�d�s r196��A��`''economictow- ��Stallation t ewreduced'
_�„_..- �y�m�red amon9 5 Qecert�be rovide ine buc a n,�he d�sign
- f�eld oPeras�eleCtion � ae1107 �sela9ee pa e�was needed.
was iust announced on
low-SP�edIsL bsou9ht also of the oiba99a9 uz�NaN P�we� �ni1. aliowin9
�apabiiitY� the �Peewas used as tess �arg {irst usin9
devetoqment. a venirai airsta�r an� a� A�r linea con�ertible
', imp°�antfeatures 1963. Eastern edbY 727-
� height �oy�er fusela9 aU airports. 9 Febr�aN follow et Modei
inco��ated n" eTat�on at s Was f�o",�� °n Versionwas assen9 , a f�seiage
endene op� 196q.�hisbasic e car90 °� P by hav�n9
in �?h8 firsi M e� 7�e o�Febn�aC and a Q�ick-�han 204. a�fferin9 ed trie cuaent
'���' e� pAod p similar Modei 196? F�om it was develop introd��ed in
,,,� Modei72�s'nSeN ei727-1� 12'1-2 eiT27sof
�; �arg ssen9 196 entered �_�a�90 Advan taiai of 1.�2 M� M 1
� i oipa service a or
�1 1��the nedh Y�� fb�3 pg ml. ��ucti on ended �n 19� wiih some 100 a�dines=irlines
b ht Aava�ced "l2? eUa Atr l'�nes• Eastetn A
t ten9 ross We�� Croely. When p. osc 1.��rilnes. �
,� `' 1973 a nd 1981�t bee °l��� a°c aft, are Amecican A
� ' ail ve��o�s With o
1 operatois�ea0d�ries.
� and United P: Rdvanced727-200
tiOn: BOei�9 ����fans
Specifica �o�89Passen9�hitneY��8�•9A ml;
pti9�n�USA of3:uP Ihlac24,700iti�53ewithfuei
'fYPs��om�'{tetcial fii�htcrew k ed699mPht p if tg145m1:tYR'�Iran9
pccommodation: ��.50a,ibt6577- 9
PoWerritantCBhmaX�mea542SmP (812km1at30,� cake-oSf20g.5�1b195028k9�
n ht3Q StOin
Performa� opplbt k 1 maxim�m69mt;hei9
econom«°ru15�mitest3,�06ktn1 45,359 9 � fc2int46•
�t reseN�s2.303 �a�in9��. ml:ten th153
WQ1 �n�onSpsP�^�OBft� Osaf9�57.93R'�`i
d�m •Win9a�ea1.��• r-rI�
+ ��p.36mL C� �
iZi����,�
goein972�-2� t�Pper side viei�
�
. j�F,�".>� `�
, h k
�
t
Douglas DC-8 Super 60 and 70
Douglas DC-8 Series 70 of Overseas National Airways.
� .........�..�__..rl.. ..."".
History and Notes
The basic DC-8 design showed great potential for growth and on 5 April 1965, Douglas
announced a new stretched series based on the DC-8 Series 50. The first member of this
new series was the Super 61, which featured a massive stretch of 36 ft 8 in (11.18 m►,
offering a maximum capacity of 259 passengers. Second in the series was the Super 62
which sported a new wing of increased span and a fuselage stretch of 6 ft 8 in (2.03 ml.
Fuel capacitywas increased and this became the long-range version of the OC-8. The Super
63 combined the fuselage stretch of the Super 61 with the new wing of the Super 62 for a
high-capacity, bngrange airliner. All these aircraft were available in all-cargo (AF) and
convertible (CF) versions.
In 1979, Douglas announced details of a plan to upgraue DC-8 Series 61, 62 and 63 aircraft
by the installation of advanced-technology turbofans, the resulting conversions being
designated Series 71, 72 and 73 respectively Chosen powerplant is the General ElectriG
SNECMA CFM56, with the Pratt & Whitney JT8D-209 optional.
This programme is managed by Cammacorp of Los Angeles, Califomia and in addition to
engine conversion an optional auxiliarypower unit and environmental control system can be
installed. The first modification of a DC-8 Series 61 was completed in 1981, the resulting
Super 71 making its first flight on 15 August. Since then the company has received about
130 orders and options for conversions. Douglas claim these to be the quietest large
four-engined transports in service, offering a true noise reduction of some 70 per cent
without any loss of performance.
Specification: DouglasDC-8Super72
Origin: USA
Type: extra long-range transport
Accommodation: flight crew of 3; up to 189 passengers
Powerplant: four 24,000-Ib (1088&kg) thrust General Electric/SNECMA CFM56 turbofans
Performance: maximum speed 600 mph (966 km/h); cruising speed 531 mph (855 km/h)at
35,000 ft(10670 m); range with maximum payload 7,220 miles (11619 km)
Weights: empty operating 152,600 Ib (69218 kg); maximum take-off 335,000 Ib
(151953 kg)
Dimensions: span 148 ft 5 in (45.24 m); length 157 ft 5 in (47.98 m1; height 42 ft 5 in
(12.93 m); wing area 2.927.0 sq ft (271.92 mZ)
I
� ..
OO
� m ��
��� - - --- _ _ �
%I ..�� � � � �
i7 �_71
o a :: �- � o �-
� -r� IIIb�I�I�_ ��
� 134
. Douglas DC-9
Douglas DC-9 Series 32 of the Spanish flag-carrier, Iberia.
f'
History and Notes
� The Douglas DC-9 was a completely new design with rear-mounted engines, the first
prototype flying on 25 Feburary 1965. It was followed by the 80/90-seat Series 10, which
was powered by Pratt & Whitney JTSD engines and entered service first with Delta Air
Lines on 8 December 1965, production totalling 137. Next came the Series 30 with a
fuselage lengthened by 14 ft 10�/n in (4.54 m) to seat up to 119 passengers, increased wing
span and other improvements. They were used first by Eastern Air Lines on 1 February
1967.
� To meet the needs of SAS Douglas developed the Series 20, combining the Series 10
fuselage and increased-span wing of the Series 30; this entered service on 23 January
' 1969. SAS also inspired the high-capaciry short-range Series 40 which entered service in
March 1968. Derived from the Series 30, it has more fuel and a fuselage lengthened to seat
up to 132 passengers. Last version is the Series 50, with a'stretch' of 14 ft 3 in (4.34 m) to
seat up to 139 passengers in a modemized interior, which entered service with Swissair in
� August 1975. All versions were available in passenger (DC-9►, cargo (DC-9F1, convertible
� (DC-9CF) and passengedcargo (DC-9RC) configuratrons. Military versions include the C-9A
Nightingale and VC-9C transports ofthe USAF, and C-98 Skytrain II bgistictransportof the US
iNavy. Orders for DC-9s totalled more than 1,100 before production was terminated in favour
, of the DC-9 Super 80 series.
I Specification: DouglasDC-9Series50
� Origin: USA
+ Type:short/medium-rangetransport
� Accommodation: flight crewof 2; up to 139 passengers
' Powerplant: two 15,500-Ib (7031-kg) thrust Pratt & WhitneyJT8D-15 turbofans
Performance: maximum speed 575 mph (925 km/h1; economic cruising speed 510 mph
(821 kmlh); rangewith 97 passengers and fuel reserves 2,065 miles (3323 km)
Weights: empty 61,8801b (28068 kg); maximum take-0ff 121,000 Ib (54885 kg)
; Dimensions: span 93 ft 5 in (28.47 m); length 133 ft 7�/a in (40.72 m); height 28 ft 0 in
(8.53 m); wing area 1,000.75 sq ft (92.97 mZ)
t '`"' •
a
Douglas DC-9-30
�
.n .. ..�—.�,.. ....,. ,.�.o,. .,�
135
Boeing Model 747SP
Boeing 747SP of the Taiwanese line, China Airlines.
CHINA AIRLIN@s
Boeing Model 757
Boeing 757 of Eastem Airlines, one of the launch customers.
History and Notes �� History and Notes
^ On 3 September 1973 Boeing announced thatthe company intended to develop a lighter- _ Boeing announced in early 1978 its-intention of developing a new adyanced-technology_
weight bnger-range version of the Model 747 for use on lower-density routes. News came short/medium-range commercial transport. Identified as the Model 757, it has a new wing,
a week later than Pan American had ordered 10 of these aircraft, identified as the Model makes use of the Model 727 fuseiage and is powered by two advanced fuel-efficient
747SP1SpecialPerformance). i turbofanengines.FollowingthefinalizationofcontractswithBritishAirwaysandEastemAir
The Mode1747SP is basicallysimilarto the Model747-100B, the majordifference being a Lines for 19 and 21 aircraft respectively, Boeing announced on 23 March 1979 that
reducCron of 47 ft 1 in (14.35 m) in overall length. This provides seats for 299 passengers on production had been initiated. The first of these aircraft (N757A) was rolled out on 13
the main deck and 32 on the upper deck, with a maximum high-density seating capacity of January 1982 and made its maiden flighton 19 February 1982. The initial production version
440. Fuel tankage is aiso increased. One Model 747SP with 50 passengers established is the Model 757-200, and first deliveries were made on schedule, Eastem Airlines operat-
during 23/24 March 1976 a worid record for nonstop distance by a commercial aircraft of ing its first revenue flight on 1 January 1983.
10,290 miles (16,560 km), on delivery from Washington to Cape Town. , To achieve the simultaneous launch of this programme and of the Model 767, Bceing has
The Model 747EUD (Extended Upper Deck), in 1982 redesignated Model 747-300, has ' had to rely on national and international co-operation. For example, the airframe has
the upperforward fuselage extended aft by23 ft4 in (7.11 m) to increase accommodation in assemblies/components produced byAvcoAerostructures, Boeing Vertol, Fairchild Repub-
this area from 32 to 69 passengers. This conversion is applicable to all current production lic, Grumman, Heath Tecna and Schweizer in the US, and by CASA in Spain, Hawker de
versions except the Models 747-200C, -200F and 747SP. Orders for this option are now Havilland in Australia and Short Brothers in Northern Ireland. The Rolls-Royce RB.211-535
approaching the 20 mark. engines that powered early production aircraft have shown a fuei saving of some 53 per cent
Under the designation E-4 the USAF has acquired fourof a planned six Model 747-2006s per passenger by comparison with the engines of cuRent medium-range aircraft.
equipped as Advanced Airbome Command Post (AABNCP) aircraft, to provide a vital link Ordersforsome 140aircrafthavebeenreceived,themajorbuyerbeingDeltaAirLineswith
between the US national command and its retaliatory forces in the event of an attack on the 60 on order. �
I ISA '
Sp@CIfIC8t1o11: Boeing Mode1747SP
Origin: USA
Type: long-range commercial transport
Accommodation: flight crew of 3; up to 440 passengers
Powerplant: four 50,OU0-Ib (22680-kg) thrust Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7FW turbofans
Performance: maximum speed 609 mph (980 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9145 m); service ceiling
45,1 QO ft(13745 m); rangewith fuel reserves and 331 passengers 6,736 miles (10,841 km)
Weighta: emptyoperating 325,0401b (147418 kg►; maximum takeoff 700,000 Ib
(317515 kg)
Dimensions: span 195 ft 8 in (59.64 m); len�th 184 ft 9 in (56.31 m); height 65 ft 5 in
(19.94m);wingarea5,500.Osqft(510.95m 1
122
Specification: Boeing Model757
Origin: USA
Type: short/medium-range commercial transport
Accommodation: flight crew of 2; up to 224 passengers
Powerplant: two 37,400-Ib (16964-kg) thrust Rolls-Royce RB.211-535C turbofans
' Performance:(with186passengers)cruisingspeedMach0.80;maximumrange2.752
� miles(4429km)
Weights: emptyoperating 127,050 Ib (57629 kg); maximum take�off 240,000 Ib (108862 kg)
Dimensions: span 124ft 10in (38.05m); length 155 ft 3 in (47.32 m); height44 ft 6in
(13.56 m); wing area 1,994.0 sq ft (185.24 m2)
1
�
�il_
Boeing 757-200
� ..............�...... .�....�.�... p............. �
I
123
Air6us A3U4B2-203 of Japan's Toa Damestic Airlines.
,. r-
„ . .e ._......,....__..
History and Notes •
Atthe time that Boeing in the USAwas finalizing its Model747wide-botlytransport, studies
were initiated in the UKfora short range civil aidinerto carry 2017 passengers, a size that BEA
co�sidered ideaE for future requirernents. in Iate 1965 eight European airlines met to
consider proposais, but emphasized that a larger-capacity aircraft was needed in Europe's
crowded airspace. Continuing discussions ted to an alignment of Hawker Siddeley, Sud-
Aviation {laterA�rospatiale) and West Germa�y rspresented byArbeitgemeins�haftAirbus
iIa#er Reutsche Airt}us GmbH} xs tfie designtproduction team. Fakker iNetheriandsy and
Construcciones Aeronauticas SA (Spain) joined later the company established in December
1970 as Airbus industrie,
First ta ftywas the A30{}83, on 28 Ociober 1972, with #he first A3f14B2, representing the
basic production version, on 28 June 1973. The A300B2 entered service with Air France on
30 May 1974; it was sopn found to be quiet in operation, economicai, reliable, and easy to
maintain arrd operate. What had once seemed s gamble became a majar success stary,
with orciers and opfrons for A300s iram 40 airlines in 29 countries totalting mare than 306.
Majoroperators includeAir Franca (19), EastemAir Lines (34), Indian Airlines (10), Saudia (11)
and Thai Intemationa! (10j.
Speaificatian: Airbus IndustrieA300842�0
Origin: Intemational
Type: wide-bodyshorUmedium-rangetransport
Accomrnodetion: flight crewof 3; up to 336passengers
Powe7p�ant: two 52.500-Ib (23814kg) thrust General Electric CFE50C1 turbofans
Periormance: ma�umum cruising speed 566 mph (911 kmfi) et 25,000 ft{7620m);
tong-range cruising speed 626 inph {g47 kmih) et 31.004 f# (945d m}, rangewith 269
passengers, baggage and fuel reserves 3,340 miles (5375km)
Weigh#s: basic empty 176,OQO Ib (79832 kg); maximum take-qff 363,9631b (165000kg)
Dimensions: span 147 ft 1 Y<in {44.84 m}; �rtgth 175 ft i 1 in {53.62 m}; height 54 ft 2�Ja in
ii 6.53 m); wing area 2,798.71 sq ft(260.00 m2)
� Q
�'1 �a_
Airbus A31Q
Airbus A310 of Swissair.
History and Notes
To meet European and worid airline requirements for a large-capaciry short-range airliner,
Airbus Industrie finalized the design and layaut of the A310, which shares much component
cammonality with the A304. A decision to proceed with its development was made in July
4978 and the first oi ihree prototypes tF-WZLHf made its maiden fiight on 3 Aprii i982.
Certification was gained in early 1983 with entry inta service, initially with Lufthansa and
Swissair, following shortly afterwards.
. The A310 ditfers fram the A300 by having a fuselage of reduced Iength to pravide
standard accommodation fpr210 to 255 passengerswith a maximum of 282 in high-density
seating, a new advanced-technology wing of slightly reduced span, new and smaller
harizontal tail surfaces, modified landing gearand new underwing pytons ab�e to maunt any
oi the atternative powerpiants that are avaitable from Genarat Eiectric, Pratt & Whitney or
Rolis-Rayce. The initial production version has the designation A310-200, but an A310C-200
convertible, A3i0E-2Q0 freighter and alartg•range development known as theA314-344 are
ptannetf.
Orders and options for the A31Q total 192 for service with 17 airlines, major firm orders
received from Lufthansa (25), KLM (10), Kuwait AW (10) and Swissair (10).
Specificatian: Airbus (ndustrieA310-200
Origin: I nternational
Type: wide-body shartlmedium-range transport
Accammadattan: flight crewof 2; up to282passengers
Powerplant: two48,000-Ib (21772-kg) thrust Pratt & WhitneyJT9D-7R4D1 turbafans
Performence: maximum cruising speed 556 mph {8g5 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9145 m); bng-
rangecnaisirtgspeed515 mph{g28 kmfija#37.000 ft{11280 m}; rangew�ih218passengers
and fuei reserves 3,224 miles 16448 km}
Weights: empty operating 169,525 I� (76895 kg); maximum take�off 313,055 Ib (142000 kg)
DimensEons: span i44 ft0�/s in t43.90 m}; length 153 it i�h in {46.fi7 m); height 51 ft 14�hi�
{15.81 mj; wing area 2.357,37 sq ff {219.00 mZj
. - . .� ,. � •iw;
i13
RECESS
AIRPORT RELATIONS
COMMISSION
' : � Page No. 4489
' � � � � July 18, 1995
�)
reconstruction, and stated that Council does not want to divide the
neighborhood and can continue the discussion. He stated that there
are two reasons it is important to have neighborhood support - if
there are fewer than 35% of the property owners petitionuig the
project, it must be approved by a 4/5 vote of Council. He further
stated that the other unportant aspect is that Council does not just go
in where there are 30% of the house holds objecting and install a
project. I I
Mr. Kaupaun stated that there are many people who are not present
this evening but support curb and gutter. He informed Council that
he received his letter about the project but obviously other people
did not. He felt that people thought there would b�e discussion
tonight on the differences in the projects and people would discuss
that information and make a decision at a later meeting.
Public Works Director Danielson offered staff seiices for help and
discussion of individual neighborhood concerns. ;
!
Council encouraged the residents to call city engineering if they
want a copy of the feasibility or have any questions or concerns.
� ; II
It was the consensus to continue the hearing to August 15.
��
Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 9:47 p.m. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:02 p.m.
Council acknowledged the Airport Noise Plan of Action and a
a memo from-Administrator Lawell regarding a presentation by the
Airport Relations Commission. Commission Chair Scott Beatty and
Commission members A1 Stein, Dave Olson and Joe Leuman were
present for the discussion.
Mr. Beatty reviewed the Plan of Action for Council and audience
and responded to Council questions. �
Councilmember Smith asked that the Commission request
demographic information on the difference between Stage III aircraft
and hush-kitted aircraft. , �
There was discussion over the FAA's role. Mayor Mertensotto
stated that the FAA's charges to protect safety and to increase
capacity are in conflict from the beginning. He stated that the city's
position should be that the FAA should only be charged with flight
safety. j ` �
GlTY O� MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�'
�ctober 4, 1995
TO. Airpart Relations Commission Memhers
FROM: Tom Laweii, City Administr
�UBJECT: E}iscuss Duai Track Airport Planning Matters
DISCUSSION
As announced in the Friday News, the Dakota County Board of ! I
Commissioners has officially va#ed to oppose the relocation of MSP to, southern
Dakota County. This position was taken despi#e opposition from the cities of
Mendota Neights, Eagan and Sun�sh Lake who argued that such a deeisian shouid
wait unti! the final results of the six year Qua! Track Airport Planning S#udy are
known later in 1995.
Attached please find a copy of the Dakota County staff report to the County
Board which outlines the togic used in making their decision. Ptease carefulty no#e
the adopted staff recommendation on page 9 of the report under the heading
Airport 4ptians - Option 2 which reads in part:
f
"This option would commit the Board of Commi�sioner ta supporting the
noise mitigatian measures in collaboration with northern Dakota County
cities. Specificaliy, Dakota County would ask the affected citieslto define
the noise mitigation program which they desire and the County ,would join
the cities zn seeking such a program though the MAC, Legislature, and other
channels, as appropriate." I
This statement clearly represents an opportunity we should aggressively
pursue. We have learned that the Physical Development Committee of�#he County
Board will meet on �ctober 24, 1995 to consider a funding request from southern
Dakota County interests (SOAR - Stop Clur Airport Retocation) to hetp support their
Dual Track lobbying efforts at� the capitol. Amazingly, SOAR has alsa proposed to
represent the interesis of the whote County, inctuding ours, as part of the funding
requsst. At our NDCARC meeting heid on September 27th, it was evident that
northern Dakota County cities were clearly not in favor of this arrangement. Given
the County's stated position to assist northern Dakota County in its effort to
mitigate noise, it seems only fair to similarly fund our effort as well. �
�
Attached please #ind a draft letter addressed to the Dakota County Board
setting forth our stance on this important issue. Member cities of the NDCARC
have been sent a copy of this letter asking for their input and suggestions which
will be discussed on October 13th. It is our hope to have something ready for
formal presentation to the Caunty Board at their Physical Development Committee
meeting scheduled for October 25th.
ACTtON REQUtRED
, Discuss the impac# of the Dakota County Dual Track posifion taken by the
County Board, and discuss how to best take advantage of their pledge to assist
northern Dakota Caunty cities with noise mitigation needs.
0
,
�
. � u
City o�
��,, ,• � 1Viendota Heights
October 11, 1995
Dakota County Board of Commissioners
1590 West Highway 55
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Commissioners:
On October 5, 1995 the Mendota Heights City Council discussed the recent
action taken by the County Board to formally oppose relocation of MSP to
southern Dakota County. It has always been our position that no conclusion
should be made relative to the issue of relocation until the Dual Track study was
concluded.
Independent of the position taken by the Board, the Mendota Heights City
Council was additionally concerned by the request from the SOAR organization to
fund their lobbying activity on the airport relocation issue. The SOAR organization
has never met with representatives of Mendota Heights to discuss their objectives;
nor do we believe that SOAR represents our interests in the Dual Track debate and
our poise mitigation concerns, given the basis upon which SOAR was originally
founded. ' �
We therefore object to Dakota County spending taxpayer dollars in support
of lobbying costs for a narrowly focused organization. Furthermore, an ,
expenditure of County funds would be totally inappropriate given the limited
objective of the SOAR organization, and would set a dangerous precedent for
other non-governmental entities to seek lobbyist funding from Dakota County.
A motion was made and passed at our October 5th meeting directing the
Mayor of the City of Mendota Heights to inform the Dakota County Board of
Commissioners in writing of the Council's expressed opinion.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�.,.�, �. �G�-...�►�—.-t.�f'
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor � � - �
pc: local area newspapers
_ �; -
� .. - �.�� r��. , 1101 Victoria� Curve � 1Vlendota�� Heights;"1Vi�N.:'S5118 - , A�.452 • 1850 . `�'�� � -
{(
DRAF�'
October 3 9, 1995 i
i
�
Dakota County Board of Commissioners
159Q West Highway 55
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Commissioners:
In action recently taken by the County Board, it is our understanding thafi
you have chosen to formally oppose the relocation of MSP to sou#hern Dakota
County. Additionally, we understand that you have pledged to support the efforts
of narthern Dakota County cities in their continuing battle against aircraft noise.
We appreciate your attention to our needs, and laok forward to workrng with you
coaperatively in making aur communities better places to iive.
�
On t3ctober 25, 1995, the Dakota County Physicai Develapment Committee
of the Whote wi!! consider a request from the SOAR organixation of southern
Dakota Caunty to fund a lobbyist position related to the County's Dual� Track
position. Please be advised that the cities represented by fihe Northern Dakota
County Airport Relations Coalition (NDCARC) are not comfortable being
rapresented by SQAR in matters related ta aur overall noise mitigation;concerns.
�
Clearly the SOAR organization has as its primar}� emphasis the p� evention of
airport relocation, not the reduction of air noise over the northern part�of the
County. As the legislative debate related to the Dual Track process heats up,
these fiwo goals will eventually become mutually exclusive. As such, it will
become impossible for one servant to serve two masters, and northern� Dakota
Counfiy interests will surely suffer.
i
To address these cancerns, we propose two separate options. First, the
County could decide not to fund SDAR, thereby leaving all parties on their own to
labby their respective positions. In the alternative, the County could choose to
pledge an equal amaunt of money to both efforts, ailowing SOAR to more clearly
focus on its relocation opposi�ion efforts; and NDCARC #o focus more ctearly on
«
its noise mitigation efforts. Given the importance of this issue to Dakota County,
we believe the latter option is most preferred. �
I
Dakota County Board of Cammissioners
October 19, 1995
Page 2
�RAFT
Representatives of NDCARC will be present at your October 25, 1995
meeting ta further discuss this issue with you. Should you have questions prior to
then, ptease feel free to contact Mayor Mertensotto in Mendota Heights, 1101
Victoria Gurve, Mendota Neights, MN 55118.
Tom Egan Charies E. Mertensotto
City of Eagan City of Mendota Heights
Jim Toye
City of Mendota
Jae Attcins Frank Tiffany
�� City of Inver Grove Neights City of Sunfish Lake
�
3
4��22,'g5 16�24 ID�DAKQTA CC�VTY PHYSICAL D FAX�612-891-7431
OAKOTA COUNTY
PHYSICAL pEVELOPM�NT COMMRTEE OF THE WNOl.E
REQUESt FOR CCMMiTTEE REVtEiN
�: PHYSICAI.OEVElOPMENT
'MENT: Offtce of Pl�nntn�
Petgoa: .tack Oi�more
rte Nwnbec: 891 4'OOt
t By: Joha Tocha
Public Comment: �_
MEEi1NQ OATE: Septembe�26, i995
�Et�tonvR�: I �
6udgete�d:
Non�uci��teQ: � i
t?thte� Fttndit�g; �
I�ItA: _X____
tnforn�wGonal: �
!1'EM: OuaE T�ack Airport Pla�ning Ptacess: petetmina#iott of Cl�kata Cot�ttiy Pasition
SUMMARY
PAGE 2
� �
The purpose of this item is to provide information an the Duai Track A3rport Planniaq Pror.ess that wilt facilitate a
decision on fhe Counfy's posiYtan with respeot ta the aptior�s unQer oonsideratior� in fhe Planning PrQcess by tt�e 6oard
af Comcriissioners. This informatian was �equesfed by fhe Caunty 6aard at ifs Sepiember 5� 1995 meeting. Options
(ar 6oar�f action are provided, atong wiih a staff rec�mendation.
;
In this paper, stafi suggest six rnaJa� uiteria for a dec�sior� inrith t�espect to the #wo primary a'srpoc# altematives -
Excansion o: the 1Ainn�ap�fis-St Pa;�l lnte.national A�rport arA the bcsii�;� a€ a ne� re�ta�csmant airpoR ir� eas�-c�nirat
' ta County. Each of ihe six uiteria -- the need for a r,ew au�por� aK serv"�ce conskleraf�or�s. grouad access,
� _.,pnmentai impac�, eco�omic and community impac� sr�d cost- are analyzed and suryx�ary conclusion are
'pnavided. These conciusions are reflected in the lotbwu�g table. j I •
� •
In $dditiaa, statF surveyed the pcsifion of Oakota Caunty sites with respect to the a'upott and evatuated 1 n�ssue -
landbanwng - wh[ch it is believ�! wit! emerge in th� ptot�ass, Two cities (Hasbr�gs a�3 Rosemauntj and the t
Association of To�raships oppose �elacation of the a'�aotC the Aircr�f# Noise Com�rtission itt lttver G�ve Heights is
recommending that the City support reCocaGon of MSP, but the City has not acted on this tecommendation; and a!I
other cities have not adopted a formai pasition. (Howeve�, it is kno�vn that Eagaa, for eycample, apposes the 6oaM
makirtg any decision on its pasiiian at this time; a�guing that the BoaM shoutd aurait cornpletion af Dual-Track Plaaning
studi�s.j j �
_ _-- �
The avaitabte evidenc� tends to support: �
�rite a . �.. MSP Expansion New �tjctiort Undecidp,�
Ai�port OperatianslNeed ! i
Ai� Service !
Ground Access � �
Envtrc�nment �
AicCraft �ioise • I
. Sociai tmpacts 5 � , I
Wate� Qusiity i
Water Qua�tiEy t I
Floadplain tmFacts �
F2rm[and Impacts • �
;canomic/Cammuni(y lrnpact � •
� � l
��r'
� �
;i... �. ... ...�. �
= he optiorts suggested far cc�ns+decation afe: (1} dotormi�e that theto is no# sufficient infom�atian at t��is time otte wfiict�
� base a decisionldetay actian uniil ir�formatbrt is availabi�; {2) oppas� retacaztiat� aF ti�e airpaNsuppoR'rto3se
nitige6ion measures as requested by cities affectea by MSP; (3} sup�ort expansian of MSP at a iater datelencaurage
trona Cortsiderafion af suonlcrnental airn�rt nntienc A'v�slna' enfinr� with rnsnF+r_f !n landhankir�n ic nrPsenttd.
49�22 '95 16�24
: : . � '.Z•Z�il!'�
� � _ � • � - •'■�- •� �
-2-
FR}{ �612-891—?�31
PRGE 3
The Duat T�ck A1�praK Planning Procers was c,neatec� Dy tt�e Ma�nesota L.eflislatwre In 1989. It directed both khe
Met¢aapolitat� AirpaRs Commissior� (MACj a�d ttis Metc�opot'� C�wnal to e�cam�ne haw ta best meet the +r�gion's
aviatian demand over ihe next 30 years (f.e., to 2020}. irie age�rtdes wer�e to campare expa�sion o! !he Mlnneapolis-
St.Paut Intemational Aicport (MSP) wtlh constr�udion of s tiew replaaement airpoR.
The state end faderal Environrriental lmpad Statements � for the Dual Track Airport PlaaNng Process belrig
F�Paretf hy the MAC �n� the Fedetal Avist�an Adrnit�tsiratiott {�AA}, rvilt compare thase and ai! othee teasibie
altematives to meet 202o a�iatior� demand,
Tt�e MAC completeQ the MSP Long-Terrn Comprehensive Pian �'inal Altc�mative E�vironmeniat Qioa�meat in
February, 1995. aad the New Ai�►art Camprehensive Pla� Fina1 Attemative Environme�tal Doamont (AEO) in April,
i 995. The Oual Track Airport Plaar�ing Prccess EIS Seao�d Pt�ase Scaping Report was compteted in MaY, 1985. and
a Scoping �ecision w�s reached at a July 26,1995. meetirg of the MAC.
ihe purpase of the Scoping Qecisiqn is to present the deveiopm�nt aiternatives� environmental issues and.impad
cate�ories ihat the MAC artd the FAA propose to study, analyze, ar�Q Cist;uss !n the E!S for the Dual 7rack Airport
Planaing Process. The types af aitematives fhat havc been oansiQered inciuQ�: No Adiam MSP E�ansia�; New
Replacement�Airport; Remofe Runway Concept; Supplemontai Airp�aR Co�cep# (usic�g MSP �nd c�cisting airparts}; and
H�gh-SpeeQ latercity Rai� (Twin C�ties to Gh�ca�o). High-SpeeQ lrrtercity Rail and the Remote Rurrwa�r Conce�t
aitematives have been etirninated from fuither co�sideration as r�ot feasibte.
i. The A1tem$tives
�
The 1la Rction altem�iive .^.os�sisfs o# the �xTs!'sri� 2i+r�art faci�ities at MSP And tfiost� ra�srriftA� proJeds 4viffi func�i�g
a�proved by the MAC i� its cucrent Capitai 1mpt+ovement Pragram. Cornmitted majo,r projecis incic�Ce Runway 4-22
ertec�sior�� a'ne�nr Federal lnspec#ioa Senrices facility, a�ew Sun Country i�angar, at�d an e�artde� Ground
TranspaRation Center. . �,,,,,
'the MSP Facpapsion alternative caasis+Is of eacisting a€rpo:t la�tt'Ries, the ocns#nudion af the Rum+vay 4-ZZ exter►sion,
constivctic�n of � new 8,oao-faot northrsauth n�mvay, a new replacen�eM ierminal building on the west side of MSP.
anQ a par�cin�tdrop-oft tacit�ty on the east siGe of the �atrpart %r tickete� passengers w3ih camy-on ba$gage. fvraund
t�a�spoRaUon access would be p�ovided from TH 77/Ceda� Av�nuc a�d TH 62/Crosstavm to the n�w west-slCe
entra�ce of ttie replacertient terminat.
The New Reptacement Airpart altemat�ve wauld require �oquisition of �t least '14,000 acres in Dakota County. the
co�stcu��on o� si7c runways, a term�rta[, tr�c�rays, internat toaQ�rays* bu�lding ar�as� �iccraft maimenaacc� faciiities�
suppori facilities� mi(itary facililies, parking� a�d new highway aocess from the new replacement airpo�t ta the renionaf
highvtir'ay system. �
The Suppleme�tal Airport Goncept atternative vtirould retain a1! af !he existirt� and committe� facilities at MSP.
utiliZe fhe e�cis#in� ru�waysJfacilitics at anothec ezistir�g airpat in fhe state for somo of the MSP operatians, ar�d
Constr�ud a better tra�sportation link between tho two faci(ilies. The purpose of this aftemattve would be to retaiirs the
oxisting good ground �tccessibit�ty and developme�t related to MSP, vrhtfc� retocating some M5P operations ta a
supRlemental airport (e.g. Rocheste+t, St.Paul Downtown, o� St. Cloud) such that additional rt��ways would not be
req�iired at MSP before 2020,
• � .
Thirty different environmental issuermpact cafegories were Facamined in the Scoping Report. 1t was determined ia
the Scoping Decision that 26 issuetimpact categorics wau[� tequife mote Qetaited analysis of the four altematives �n
!he EIS. Faur environmental categaries wiA nol teceive furthet analysis becausc it was detennined that their impacis
would not be sigt�i#icant oc relevant. They are COasta) barriets. caaStal zorte managemerit �rogram, mincrat cesaurces
and sotid wastc. Oakota County CoeS �ot ag�ec with the elimination oi the soliQ waste impact category,
2. The Prccess
The MAC wi!! prepare a O�aft Er�vir+at�menial tmpact Staterneot {OEiS} for pubiic and �geacy raevivw. 7ho DEiS wtlt
aQa��ss the issues ideMified in the Sco�lq� peGstoa. Prelimi�tsry versions of tt►e OEIS wil( be mado avaitabte to ihe
Policy'and Technical Revicw Committees of the Oual Track A'�rport Plaanirtg P�ucess sta�il�g in Octobe�,1995. The
!'tFSC•�•�Et r
i
' 49�22 '95 16�25 ID�DAKOTA C011�1TY PHYSICR�. D FAX:612-891-7031 PAGE 4
-3-
C and FAA oompleted DElS wili be avallabie durir�g a SQ-Qay puWlc comment period whictt woulQ begin December
�� '. 1995 and cJose Feb�uary 5. 1996. Pubqc hee�ings will ba hetd during January.1996. After the comment period
..�os�s� MAC wi11 pcepare a Fnal Siate E!S for March.1996, with the Minnesata Envinonmental Quality Board
(MNEQB) ta determir�e adequacy of the E(S in May,1996. The MAC and the Metropo(itan�CounGt are to make their
tecomma�dations to the Min�ssoia LeDislature by Jufy 1,1996. � ���
lSSUES ANO CONCERNS ' I '
i
The�e are many issues and concems that impact Oakoia County whether MSP is expanded or a N{ Auport is lwilt.
( O ur ana t y s is b e fow is focus e d o� t hese t w o a ftema t i ves; t hese a l terna tives b�a c ke t t he issues in t he d e b a te,) T he
followinQ areas are those highlighted by County staff as criticai issues for �eview. �
1. Airport Operationa! issues / Need
in Oecembe�, 9993. the FAA completed an MSP Capacity E�ha�ocme�t Plan. The plan examined difforent runway
altematives at MSP with tlie �evise4 2020 operatio�s forecast scenarios prepared by HNTB_ 7he basetioe 2020
toreCast was 530,000 operations; the highest sce��rio forecasted a maximum of 600.004 ope�atio�s,in 2020.
MSP Expaasiort. The FAA analysis pi+esented in the MSP Capaci(y Enhancement Pla� projeds that wltb one
additional NrnNay, MSP would be able to mai�taia or improve operaGonal e�cienaes. In 2820� aj bofh 530.000
a�nual aircraft operations (Future 1) and 600,000 operations (Fulure �, average delay per air+crait would be less than
ls currently experience�d at MSP. (See Ext�iWt 1. Exhibit 1 co�tains average delays for each of severt capacity
enha�cement atfematives.) . i 1
I
IP a it�nr terrr�i��at at MSP is c-0nstructeG on the west side of tl�e exining fzdli�y �c indic�.ted i� tha MSP Long T�rm
IAret�ensive Plan AED. �dditionaf capacity enhaecements could be expectea to be achieve� based on improveci
�•• .sid taxi distances. Funhe�, NNT6 (the primary consultartt to the MAC tor the Dua1-TcacK Pla�ning Pr+�cess) has
�. ;, sed !he FAA's ai�field modeGog prt�gra�ri (knowa as SIMMOD) to derrionstcate the e�denaes achieved by the
9 ;
"'�oombined irnpact of both a new MSP nrm�ray and new MSP.tem�inal. �
" . • I�
' New Airport, The worlcing assumptian by the M9C unQer�y�ng the eomparison of MSP with the NewAi�port in the
bual Track AirpoR Pla�ning Process is that the New AlrpoR will be scaled to accommodate the forecasted 2p20
demanQ. Theretore, by definition. the New AirpoR altemative will meet 2020 needs for operations. ' f
Conclusion. @ase6 on FAA and MAC analyses, MSP can accort�modate future forocasted demand i ti one
additional tunway. (i.e., average defays woutd be tess then cuRently experienced at forecasted demaod levels) The
New Aitport wil! de facto meet demand. Therefore, the nood fot a New Airport based on airport only;ihe need !o
accommodate increased operations is not demonsuated and othet factors {e.g.. cost) must be oonsidered.
2. Air Service lssues ,�
�
Ai� service issues �emain to ba finatized in tho EIS. However, the foltowing is known:
0 8ased on the Metropolitaa Counal's 'Annuat Contingeecy Assessment, Major Ai�poct Strategy' (s report to
the Minnesota legis[ature i� February, 1995) ai� cargo operations at MSP declineQ by 6°� dunng 9894, but aic
• cargo tonnage inc�easea 16°,6 to e total ot 370,000 tons. This represents a continued trer� of decreasing ai�
cargo operatlorts �nd increasing air Ca�o tonnage. Accotding to industry analysts, the cume�t trend in ai�
cargo operatior�s a�d ai� cargo tonnage indicates a healthy ratio of demand/capacity air cargo servlce at
MSP. i I
o Near torm improveme�is at MSP includc implementation of a GPS systcm by Novembe� and a new Air
Tra(fic Controf Tower cunent(y under consi�udion. These im(�rovements wit( enhance air sorvice.
;��?, The total number of flights at MSP increased from 444,000 in 1993 io 450.000 flights in 9994iwlth the
tncrease p,imarily due to regio�at and cha�ier airline catagories. Non-stop service to i4 new maricets was
addsd. This growtt� lails witl�in llie expected range ot forecast sce�arios %r 2d20.
�9�22 '95 16�26 ID�DAiC#�TA COUNTY PHYSiCRI. D FAX�612-891-7433. PAGE 5�
•i-
Ma�or c+Qnoerns v�rt�ich ars continaing to be enaf�rzeci with r�spect ta a new elrpaEt are differer�tisi fsres at�d the
polential t'or iRcrreased feres with the c�onsicud� of a NewAi�wR. Incna�as�d taraes coulc! have a substar�tial negative �
impad oa re�ional sir carrier service io Greater Mina�soLa. Fo� exam�p�te, at Oenve�'s nevv OIA. where approxlmately
KO was a�dde� to ihe cost af a �epion�t caMer �M� senrioe to Narih and Scuth Dakote, Kansas, �nd Wyomtng
d+�nations have been dramaticaity t�e�uced. attd ir� sortte cases eliminated. .
Conctusia�. Whlle anatysts apgciac to suApatt the argum�rtE lha; ihere is a haelthy raiio ai det�att�-ta�apadty for
aic cargo service at MSP and the�e are significant oQncerns wtf.h rosped to the poteatial for hiQheE tat+es and their
potential impact on regional air senrice� �o condusion is warranted unUl this iswe is more tully a�alyzed in the ElS.
3, Grou�nd Aocess tssues (Highways}
Bofh major altemaiives involve major canstrudion costs far ro�dways.
MSP Expatqsion. Accocding to the MSP Long Temt Camptehensive Plan. if MSP is e�►anded ir� its present 1acaGocY
w�th a New Tetminai adjaccnt to Codar Avenue and the Cr�sstown, them will be no Regia�al Higtiway SYstem
improvements r+eguired in Oakoia County� narrviii there be any nocded Dakata Coanty highway impra�ements,
�rom a rsgianaf perspective, TN 77lCe�ar Av�nue 1n Richfietd betweer� t-494 atid TH 621Crosstown wi�l aeeQ an
additiona! fa�e In each directio�; fhe Cedar Ave�tue and Cr�sstown in#et�cliar�ge w1li have to be reEw�lt io
accomrr�odate th� new Wcrsi%rminal; and an additiona! lane wi(! be c�+�eded on the Crosslown betweea Cedar
Avenue on the east and the i•35W comman section on the west.
Tataf �oadway costs for MSP eXpansion �nuuding terminal circuiatian roadwaysj are estirnated at �i01 milE�on
(upclated Sepi�mber 15, 1995 cast estimates).
(�i�rsw Airport. Accorrling io tho New Aicpad Comprehensive Pla�. �f a New�A3cpoR is retar•ated to Dakola Co�sr�ty
substantiat improve�rnents will have to be mado to tt�e Re�tonal Niqhway Syslem in Dakota Counfy. These p�ojects
wantG fiadude: (1j aa interchange and access ramps betw�een TN 55 and i-494; (2) between this new t-a94
ir��er�hat��e and TH 522afayette Freeway. a 6-iane fteewaY. C3) an 8-tane freeway from �TH 5?Ji.afayane Freeway
alon� the TH 55 �f�grar��at to tha New Ai�port +�tcattce; {4) eupansioa of tfte TN 6i bridge ovec ihe Mississippi Rivec
to 4-lanes; (5) capaaty improvement ta the 10tl� Stneet aad TH 55 tntersedians with TH 611n Hastings;'and {6)
capaaty impmvements to TH �16, �
impads to Dakota Caunty highways as forecasted by the MAC in the New Altport Camprehensive Ptan inctude: (1)
re$tigr�ment o! CSAH 4T easf of the New Airport �t�d a� uFg��de ia a 4•laAo divideQ highway; {2} upgrado Caunty
Ro2tQ 48 anc! tmptovec! Co�ncctiot�s wS#b CSAN d7 $t the nocth side of the New Airpc�rt; actd {3} upgtade of the
TH61lCSAH 471ntersection.
Updated September 15, 1995 esiim�ttes of �egional r'oadw�y casts �ncluding lenmi�ai circulation roadways) for ihe
new airport sife s�e �238 mitlian.
!n addiifon, Oakota Gouniy siaff anatys'ss of tepatts prepared %r MnlOOT has cancluded that CSAN 42 wllf need to be
upgraded la 6-lartes with the potential for grade-separated iMorsedians. Thts proJect afene cauld mear� nea�ly 25
la�e miies of construction, substantial right-of-way acquisition, and grade-sepa�ated inte�sadions. The New Airport
wiit atso piace s�gnificant addiiiona! demand on CR23ICeCa�Avenu�, CR 46� CR 38/McAndrews. and CR 31/Pilot
Kriob. The adttitions to CSAf-( 42 cout6 cost in the neighborttood of �2,5 miition per mlte; tural roadway construction
(st�ch as t�ig#tt be dor�e fQr CfZ 4G} wi(1 cost in the neighbotfiaod of �SGti,080 per mii�. (The CSAH 42 Qsfimafe is
�ased on the average cast of a four-laac divi4ed higfiway with typical right-of•way acquisition; the adcfition of la�es
thraugh the develaped areas ot Bumsvitle� Apple Yalley, ac�d Rosemount is exp�cted to make !hc additions af one
tanc in e�ch dlrection irt ttiese segments as expensive as Qevelopment ot four-lane toadways !n Icss devetoped areas,
espociatty Quo to right-of•way casis.} The MAC justified exGudi�c� tfiesc Dakata Cou�ty higi�way improverr�ent neecis
by at�ui�g that they are thc resutt of indirBCt, ir+duced tfevcloprrtent and are n4t ditect et�mponents neCesSary for the
airpoR Eo open.
Conctusion. The estimated tatal rcgional roadway costs are more than twice as high for the new ai�rpatt altemative
�S238 mitiionj ccimpared lo lfic expansion of MSP {�i01 million). Witfi the additian of Oakota Caunty roadway costs
not inctucle� in the regianai estimatcs, the differen#iat grows subs#antiaity targer ar�d a liabiiity is shiHed diredty to
County taupayers.
�:'
t�'t:
�:
!�E F�'•• i t�.-
09�22 '95 16�27 ID�DAKOTA Cat�JTY PHYSICAL D
-5-
�. Enviro�mentai issues
FAX�612-891-7031
A lar+8e number of environmentat issves�impact categories are being studied In ihe EIS. (A oom�
envlronmental issues u�e� study ts at ExhiWt 2.} S(x issu�mpact categorles which have been
' le Oakola Couaty are highlighted be{ow.
PAGE
e list of the
greatesi concem
0
Aircran Noise. Yea� 2Q05 alnxaH adivity was rr�odeted for use in the Dual Track Airport Ptanning Process
tor seve�a! reasons. Flrst, it was esst�rt�ed that the New AirpoA would open aboe�t lhat time. Seconci. the 20Q5 aircraft
fleet mix was anticipated to inGe�de Sl�e 2 aircreft `hush-kittea' to meet stage 3 requi�ements. Tfiese alr+�xaft a�e
typlcatly noisier tha� 'true• Stage 3 oi tho same size, an6 it was desirabJe to measnre thot� impact. � Third, it was the
same year used in Ihe p�evious MSP Long-Tenn Comprehensive P�a� prepa�ed in 1993 and �evised ie �994. Thus�
ihe 2005 noise contours would �epreser�t a'worst-case' impact at bath MSP and the New Airport_ ,The DNL 65 noise
contou� was employed. (CuRently, peo�ie living inslde the ONl 65 contour are those eligible %r paiiicipation i� the
FAA/MAC Pa�t 150 Sound Abatement Program.) (
In Dakota County� outside !he acqulreQ 14.000 acr+e Ncw Airpori site there rcmain app�oxTmately 70 households anQ
200 people inside the ONL 65 noise contour. (See Exhibit 3.} I
According to the MSP lo�g Temt Comprehenstve Plan Final AED (7'abte 2i), tfiere a�e a totai of 5.830 peopte and
2,650 dwefling units inside the ONL 65 noiso contour, i I
Exhlblt 3 indicates the areas pf Dakota County effected by �oise at the.ONL 651evel. Howevor. the�MSP Long Term
Comprahensive Ptan Coes not proJect thaa any people in Mendota Helghls. Eagan, or Inve� Grove Heights wi�► be
added to those afiecEed by noise at the DNL 65 noise levol soteiy as the result of the expansion of MSP. The table
assumes yea� 2000 with year 2005 fleet mix. Cvmently� people living inside ihe ONL 65 contour a�e eligible tor
��ici�ation ia fhe FAlJMAC Part 150 So�nd Ab3(ernent Proyram. ! I
f Voise mitigation costs are estimateQ at S13 mi�lion fo� the MSP expa�sion atternative; no estimates �ar�e ys� avai�able
:_ fot the new sitpott aftamative. ' I �
Social tmpacts� Residential Populatio� Retocated. As shown in the Long-Term Compreliensive Plan Final
AEO. the prefeired altemative for the expansion af MSP witl displaco about 559 residents (206 households}. It wiu
atso resuit in the displacement of 27 off-airport businesses with aUout 1.450 employees. F(fty businasses o� MSP
property wouiQ be dispfaced. ; . �
Between 800 and 1,000 people in DaEcota County will be displaced with !he eonstruction of the New A+rport. (No
Oakota Coaniy �osident will bo displaced with the expansio� ot MSP.) Marshan Townshlp will loso 269'a of its tax base
and Vertnitlion Township over 119�0 of its tax base to a New Airpott. (No Dakota County reside�tt will be displaced witfi
the expansion of MSP. anQ no OakQta County city will lose tax base as a result of MSP expa�sion. )�
Wata� Quality. Pote�tial fot Co�tttmination. Almost the entire 14.000 acres include6 in the New Atmort
site are highly o� very highly sensitive to groundwater cantaminaUon. (See Exhibit 4.} The construction o! a New
Airport in Dakota County �vi[I g�eaqy inerease the possibi[ity of grou�dwater contaminaiion. either th�ough surface
water management difficufties associated with the site or surface/sub•surtace wate�'run-on' onto the sito. 6ecause
Dakota County citiesKownships obtain their water !rom wells, waler quality is direcify linked to the issue ot municipal
water suppty. No Dakota County aty has its wate� quality airectty impacted as a �esult of MSP expansio�.
�
At MSP� the majoc water quafity issue relates to slorm wate� nmoff contaminatioa, cspeclally deicing chemicafs used
du�ing the winter and notice�ble in the spring. The MAC has bcgun lo address ihis situation in its Capital
Improveme�t P�ogram (Ctf�) with the ptovision [or a closed-loop chemical retention and recavory sYstem ta bc
instailed over the next sever�l yc;acs. �I' I
Waier Quaritity� OrawQocvn and lm�acts on M�nicipal Water Supply. 7F�ere is se�ious ± ncem about the
;�,,: cr, term impact of ihc waie� requirements for a majar iacility sucl� as ttte New Airpori on ihe water supplies for ihe
'''•'�'��ea. The water supply tor nea�ty al! reside�is af Dakota County is drawn from aquifcrs. Wittiout the new airport. the
Motropatitan Councal has io�ecast that 46 peroe�t of the addilional groundwater use in the region beiween the present
and 20'10 will occu� ic► ilasemount. Appie Vatley, 6umsville. artC Eaga�; g�ouna water uso in each of these cltles ts
torecast to increase by over 30 percent. Tho atlditionat draw down of the ground water suppty to meet the �dema�ds
I
49f22 ' 95 16 � 27 I D: Dfi�1COTA GO�+lTY PNYS I C�i.. D FA}( . 612-891-?431
. , ' ` � -.....----
-6-
PAGE 7
ot a new airport caulc� potenEialty t�uire aither the cJties or tho Nev+r Airport ta timit expansJed use of ihe grour�4waler
in the #ature. � .
• The pret'ersa� attemaiive fo� MSP e�ar�sion has ihe teast pateMia# €ar Impact cn aquifers wfi�cti ptcvide �rinkin�
wate�.
Fioodptaln impacts. The fioo0plaln impads of the e�ansian of at MSP are oonsiQered to be `negligibie`
{long-Term Camprehensive Plan�.
A floodpl�in fringe of the VertniOian River runs diaqonally thrnuph the 14,000 acre New Airpon site. (See E�ct�lblt 5,)
BeCsuse of this concern, in+cr�eases relativt #o sur#ace watet tuc�off manag�ment issuc�s. 7'he patentiat for ttoodictg�
bath upstream in Farmingion and 4ownst�eam �n Hastings poses se�ious risks fo� these communities. Betweon !60
and 320 acces of iloodptain wi![ be lost du� to itew aitpaR c,anstn�ction attd wi!! havo !o be reueated in an atternpt to
mitigate fCaacipiain impacis,
Ptime f�tcmtar�d. The New A1t'p4rt attema#ive would require fhe Yaking` af about '14.fl00 actes af tarm;and
!or construdion of �he �ew airporl. Most of iher land is oonside�ad farmfa�d. The New Airport site would taice 8,28�
acres oi land Ide�tified as 'prirr�e fatmiat�i. {See Exhibit 6.j Abaui �7,181 acr�es af iand �n the Agricuitural Pr�secves
program would �ie atfectad. (see Exhibit 7 j At leas# 45 fatms will be afteded by the development of the new airport
site, a number af these [arnns have operated fot ove� i00 years C.e.. are'century' facros).
Beyond ttYe.Qired loss ot farrnland end thC asso�iated tatm business aciivities would be the new and cantinued
preSw�e on agticuitura outside ti�te t+[ew Airpott site btought on by airport t�tated Qevetopment prrsssures. Consuttac�ts
invotved in process ha�e �at iinalized !he impatct� but have Indicated to Dakota County and the MAC that the impact
wouid be substar�tial and dcamallc, to the point rM�ece associated airpoR deveio,pment ccuid evontuatly threaten the
ai ?scence ot agricuiturat in tho townsfiips imrr.edia+et�r s�rroc!ndin�+ the N�K Ai►port. '
Tttete are no pricnE farmlant! issues relateG to MSP e�ansion. Nowaver, sevoral holeis at Cedat Avenue and �-484 �
will iae tmpaGed. 6loaminpton is,preserttly neQoGatin� wilh the MAC and Metropolitan Council regarding the potential
snrap of Qavetog�nent right$ to rrxitigate sud� a� impact. , . .
Canclusio�. Aircraft noise has a major enviranmenta! Impact uadec e,ther expar�sloa• of MSP o� the new
ascpart altema#ive. More hauses a,na res�dents ln the regian �nrtt! t� i�apacted by noise at th� ON� 65•Ievet zfi�ar the
expa�siorr of MSP than under the constnudion of a new airport. D�kqta County�impacts at the ONl• 6S level are
shcxwn to be gceater u�d�r the r�ew airpart attemative (70 ho�usehotds, 200 peapte}, assumi�g o�ly the dired impact of
ai�poci ex,pa�sian is cansiderod. Noise lmpads on.�otthem Dakota County alies from MSP at tho ONI. 65 levet a�e
signif,,cant a�d must noi discounted.� Stro�rtg support fo� noise mltigat'son moasures �,nll be re�ulced under etthe�
attcrnative.
41het' environmectt�t impact cat�aries tet�d #a show a greaier impact on Oaka#a C�unty with #he caastructio�t af a
new ai�port than iha expansian of MSP. Howover. f�am a regiona( perspective, more disloc.�tion oi cunre�t busfness
wit! cesutt from the expar�sior� af MSP. '
5. Economic and Community Impad Issues
Studics of economic and community impads are still in p�ogress; study conclusions are not yei available. Hawove�,
severa! generat obsenratior�'s �re �rovided below based on disc�ssions af�tttesa issues ta date.
• � .
Ectanomic and cart�munity imp�cts are discussod, first, in temts of Dakota County ancS, seeand, in torms of tho statc.
and fhe cegion.
A. Dakota Cou�tty
MSP Expansion, With the oxpansion of MSP, commuc�ities .adjacent to MSP wili expecience nosseleverflights as
thei�.maiq Communiiy impact.
1n ttie near term, the Cortg Te�rm Camptefiensiv+� Ptan prc��ects fhat thcrc wit� t�e a tass cf businesses -- baih
businesses tocated on MSP property whict� wil! wiih ihe airport a�d aff-airpoR businessos (e,g.; hotels irnpaded by
dxpansioa}. It is esiimated that aboui 2,9t}0 emaoyecs couid be affecied.. #�iawever,•�n tho longer #errr�. it is likely
�"��t;�:
�9r22 '95 I6:28 ID�DRKQTA C0�1TY PF#YSICAL. � FAX�612-$91-?�31 I
• i PRGE 8
-7-
�• ..sat thosa commur�ities adjaoent to MSP wilt be abte to cant�nue to benetft fnor» slEport retated busiaess Qevetoprrier�t.
�+odudng re�ewed ecanomic benefits. , �
�.
�:;
New AirpwR. From a communiiy perspedive, if a New A1rpoR wer+e built in Uakota Cou�ty. in the short term lAe
devetopment w+wtd split the cauMy la lvw. titenstly divi�lr�g Hasilt�s ar�d !he tawnships t�vm the remainder of !he
cities. A�ricutture wouid be uRder si�ni�cant pressuna from afrpart retated i�duaed Qeveiopmen#. tti the la�ger term.
agritwlture may aot be viable in the townships lmr�ed'iatoiy sutr�undiag ihe New I�irpoR. This would s�niticanUy alte�
tt�e set�sa of comr�tc�r�ity in this paR af C�akota CauMy. ��
If is likety that agrta�ttutetiarr�steaGs as lhey ewst todaX irt Qakotg Conr�ty wo�fd begin to be dismaniled by maffcet
foraes into 5 and 10 acro �esidential harhesfeacts, in the longorterm, Oakoia County woutd have to vrreigh the casts af
provxding senrices lo the New Airport induco� deveto�rrrient wlth any iax revenues a5sociated with such deveiapmeni.
It iS expeaed that thc�e would be strong competition betweea the MAC and Pakota Caunty over the Iacatiort af
a�cpc►rt reta#ea tWsi�essjcomrrtcrcial devetapmeat. The MAC wi�C tikety seek ta retain as mu� cornmercial
development as possible wittain its border ir� arclec ta rnaximize its retum as pad of the fina�ce package to buitd the
Naw Aitpart_ The outcome ot such a stn�gle likoly wauld depend in large paR on decisians by tho Metrapolitan
Councit wiih respect to the e�ctensio� of urban services. j�
t� s ititew Airpori were canstsucted iri Oakafa Counfy, it coutd meao business act'tvity t'elacations tv Ind within pakota
County. Such irnpacts will noed to be examinod from a perspedive of net gains to the naglon a�d to Oakaa Gounty.
For ex�;mpte. in Denver, UPS mov�cS tess tttsi� 5 mites tc� be at tfze'frant Gao�' cf the ttew O!A air�iait. The magnitude
and timing of sucfi �etocations in Qakota Couqty are preser�tiy being anaiyzed by the MAC's econamic conwttants.
The poten#ial economic valuo (e.g.� i�creasc�d t,a�c �eveaucs� to Oakota County as the tesult Of a naw airy�ort h�s yet to
be es#�mated.
8. Stata �. Regiana{ Eca��omic and Commuaity lmpact lssues �
�
•rrom the state aad regior�a! perspedive, a new altpoR witl it�crease the,numbetof corutrud.ian jobs,associated with
�ts �ompietion. However, this impact must be evatuated irom the perspedive otthe net itt�pact oa #he sfa#e and
reglo�. as it is likely that construction contractars woutd �eed to import wa►ticers f�+om ont-of-state ta�meet the huge
�efia�t� af the more compact timefrarne assodated with buitdi�tg a r�ew airpo�t. ,
4ve1' the {ongec term. thece Coui� be a sh�ft in #he'certtec -af -gravit� far jabs w€thi�+ the Twi� Citi4s Met�opalitan
Region from i-494 in 6toomir�gtonlEQen Prairia to are:as atang ihe 6- atid 8-lano f�eeways buitt in Clakota County to
accommodate traffic related to the New Airport, Agaln, this impact witl in part be the resutt of declsions by the
Metropoiitan Councii with tespect to the extertsion af urban senrices. TherQ cwatd aiso be �sk to the coce ai the
regian as Jobs cantinued to shift outwards to•ihe suburbs and beyond. i�
In addition. some argue that a new aitpoR is essential to the �egion's successful participation in a�tobat eoonamy.
� ��
Furthe�, as the resuti of the constnackion of a Naw Aicport in Dakofa County, the�e witt not noeessarii,y be reai t�et new
job growth itl the �'egion, but rather the rCMocatian of jObs at MSP to �akota County. Net �ew job growlh wi11 occu� ortly
if it is assumed that the new airport wi�E gor�erate �e# r�ew ecanam`sc devetopment far tho region, as soma� E�eticsve wi14
oeaar. Relacat�on of jobs to suburt�an and exurban areas is not consistent with khe gaals of tl�e Mot�opotitan Counc'r1's
Regittttat Biuep�int. '
Conctusion. Because studies have not bean"Concluded, n6 conclusion is drawn at lhis time. �
6. Financiallssue�s. � , �
The central and largest fin<�ncial issue is the capital construction cost associated with cadt of thc altematives. Based
8c�tember 15, � 995 upciatcd esliriiates, ihe regionat cosls of each of the major altema�ives a�e ouilined b�low.
I
09�22 '95 16�29 ID�DAKOTA COU�VTY PHYSICRL D
��E
MSP F�cpa�sio�
Tatal Fadlity Costs .... ..................................... S 2.989,000�000
Propetty Acquisttions ............................
AirAeld Costs ..................:.....................
Tetminat Costs .....................................
Roadway Costs ...................................
Other Faality Costs ....-• .......................
Majo� Ulilities .......................................
Oes�9n (7�Yo) ... .. ............................ ..
Program Managemenf/inspection (896j
Cost Continge�cies (40°6) ....................
�6.000.000
88.000.000
1.372�000�000
101.000.000
788�000.000
16.00Q.Q00
16T,000.008
19�,OOd,004
239,000�000
FAX�612-891-7031
PAGE
New Airport
S 4,479,000�000
53.0OO.OQQ
301,OOQ.00Q
1,465,000,000
z�z.aao.000
1.439�OOD.a00
as,aoo,aoo
251.00O�aQO
287,00O.00Q
358.000�000
tn summary, it is esiimated that the oow airporl altemative witl oost neariy 51.5 billion more than the expansion of
MSP.
Cune�tly. the MAC's financiai consulfant (E3rown � Co_) is examining s�ch issues as fina�cing alicmatives,
predidabiiity of tur�ding souroes. per passen�er cosls. and tho risk assessmenUsorisitivity to enplanement user fees
and public investment. Tf�ey aro also fooking et the oppottunily to capiure it�dustda! values over tl�e iongec term to
finance the cost oi a New Airy�oR, sottte new version of #'iscal disparitics with tho MAC and cities impacted by the
departure of MSP benefiting most.
As previously noted, tho costs ouUined above are region�(costs a�d do aot inctude additiona[ costs which Oakota
Cour�ty would incur. Thesa oosts are substantial and inGude such Items as upgrading CSAH 42 to 6•lanes. with the
potential forgrade•se{�arated inter:Sections. and lmprovements to CR23/CeQarAvanue, CR 46, CR �/McA�d�ews,
ahd Ck 31/pilot Knob to mee! increased demands. The additions :o �SAH 42 ccsuld cust in the noighborttood ut S31
million (prelimittary estimate), •
Conciusion. 7ho conslruction of a new airpo�t in Oakota County wil! have a siflnificantiy Qreaier cost than the
altematl�e expanding MSP to meet 2020 demands.
7. Community Positions
Staff was asked to SuNey bakota County oommunities to determi�e the positions which have been takun by the
communfties with respect to ltie majo� altomativos in the Oual-Track AirpoR Planning Process. Ttte results of this
survey are p�esented betow. '
Support Support
Community MSP Attemative New Airport Allemative No Positfon
West St. Paul .....................
South St. Paul
Merjdota Heights
Mendota
L+1yda(e
Invor Grove Heigflts..:....
Sunfish Lake
Eagen .............
8u�svif(e
Apple Vaf(ey
Lak�ville
Farmington
..... . ............................................................... ..X
' X
X
X
X
.....................•------......X (Ai�cratt Noise Commission)
+ • X
Ros�mou�t ..,,,,,,,� ...............X ...................
Hastings x
Oakola Co.T�shp.Assoc. X
............ ........................ X
X
X
X
....................................X
Mos� cities t�ave nof adopled a� otfiGal pasition at thls i(mc. It (s known that Somo cities {e.g., Eagan) tavo� waittng to
take a position until ail stuCies are compietod and will likely urge sucf� an ectio� by the Cou�ty.
�
�
�;.
f:::;:::.
09�22 '95 16:29
��� • o. StcgtegiC Issue
ID�DAKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAI. D
-9-
FA}{ : 612-891-7431
PAGE 10
1t is a�ticlpateC that an altemative to ptnceedinfl with efthe� altemative In the Oua!-Track Aicport Planning Process will
be 8 pnoposal to 'Iar�dbank' land in Oakata County tor a new etrport in tha tuture. It is pn�dont fo� the Boa�d of
Commissioners to antiapate and esiabiish a position wlth resped to this issue.
rt�ajor i�temaliona( ai�port wouid be located.
A major concem with •landbanking' is that if 14�000 scxes were'r�eserved' in Dakota County as part. ot a site
preservation option for ihe possiWe locatioo of a new airpoR in the future, tt wouid i�troduce a great deat of
unc��tainty fo� not only ihaso poopte that did not wa�t to �e11 out�' but to thu area sumaunding the 14.000 acnes.
Additionai conoems lncluGe that if the land were aoquiraG by MAC and leased back for farming� the; same sta�tdard af
a9ricultural care wou(d not be ap�lied to the land as eNoRs wete made to squeeze as much production out of the
leased tand wiih highe� rales of fertiAzer and larger amounts of pestiude, the loss in tax base both to !he county and
tawnships (assuming the purchase of land by the MAC), the p�essure to build more county roads to''get ahead' of any
airpoR development curve, and the pressure tot the county !o assume moce of the responsibilitics fo� land usc and
zoning as speculstion increases ar�d land usc demands ir�tensify in antidpation of iuture airport devctopment.
i
tn addition. 'landbanking" doos �ot appear to be a prudor�t investmeni ffom a rcglonal standpoint because ihcre is not
evidence that there wiq �ot be suifdent evaitaWe land in ihe Twin CRy Metropolitan Area !or a� airport in the future.
Fucihe�� development wi11 rnost iikely continue toward the west and south in the Twin City Meiropotita� A�ea. I[Iwhcn
a Qemonstrated need acises for a replacement airpo�t. the irertd in development shoutG be considercd in Ihe locatio�
of such an airport. � •
' �
i
OPTIONS
I
'iors fo� a Cemmittee rscom�r:enCatioa te the Boar� ci CcR�missi�ners arc pr2ser.ted for b�.h the ma;or
mativos in the �ua1-Ttack Airport Plsitning Process and for the conti�geocy of the "la�dbanking' issue emorging
wlthln the Pnocess.
1. AirpoR Options . '
. I •
OPTION 1. INSUFFlCIENT INPORMAT�ONIOEiAY ANY OECISION. This o tion recognizes that the draft
EIS comparing the attemaiives wilt not bo avalfabte until Odober 1995 and that ihe public review peiiod wi� �ot begin
u�til Decembe�. There are signif,cant studies - particularfy economic and cominunity impacts and air service -• which
�re sti11 un6envay and for which lnwfficient information is consiCered by stait be available for suggesting which optior+
the evidenco tc�ds to su�po�t. This is an option likety to be suppo�ted by Eagan end porhaps other northem Dakota
Counly cities. In eftect. ihis is the `status Quo' position for Oakota County (.e., the �osition which the 6oard has taken
to date}. � �
I
OPTION 2. OPPOSE RELOCATION OF THE AIRPORT/SUPPORY NOiSE M1T[GAT[ON FROM MSP.
Tllis option aCCepts that while not all of ihe infomtation from the Ouat-Track Planning P�ocess is cori'iptete, the�e is
sufficient information with wt�ich to condude that the Boa�d of Commissioners should oppose the relocation of the
effort. This option is suppoRed by addiliona! cost of the new airport, the ability of li�e existing airpott,to mcet atrport
operatio�s needs through the planninQ periocf, ground access concems anC costs oi a ncw ai�port, and cnvlronmental
concems. Incomplete economic aad commcrnity impact information and limited information with tespect to air senrice
issues are drawbacks to ri�aking a Qedston at this time. i I
Noise milic�ation is a crucia! concent fo� both iacilities, and a special concem fo� northem Dakota Caunty eities tf MSP
romains and is expanded. i�his option would Commit tt►e Boa�d of Commissioners to supportinc� the �noise mitigation
measures in collabo�atian with northem Dakota County Gties. Specifica[ly. Oakota Couniy would ask the afEected
cities to de�no fhe noise mitigation program which lhey desi�e a�d the County woutd join thc cities in� seeking svG� a
program through the MAC, the Legisfatu�c, and other channels, as apprapriale. i I
I
OPT[ON 3. SUPPORT A DECAYEO EXPANSION OF MSPIENCOURAGE SUPPLCMENTAL AIRPORT
�j��• , �
:;�::7PTIONS. While not cliscussed at lei�gth abovo, tf�e Supplemental Airport Cortcept is considered to be a teasib(e
��'� aliernative which is being addressed within the EIS_ A� option fot ihe E3oard of Commissioners is to�encourage
tetaining MSP. while �eiocating some MSP operations to a supplemental aitport (e.g., RoG�ester�. St� �Pau! Downtown.
St. Cloud, ot Oututh). This option cotild evoid tho adQitiona! cost o! MSP expa�sion (excludirig eominitted proJeUs) in
tha Immediato term. whilc making mora use� of existi�g iacililies etsewhere in Minnesofa. lssues reinain with the
� I I
09�22 '95 16:30 ID�Ilfl1COTA COU�ITY PHYSICAL D FAX�612-891-?031
. �. . r. . _.
-14-
PAGE 11
eftedive�ess of this option. For exampte� iar�cargo� coufd �ust-in-time' delivery sct�edules be matntai�ed? WouIQ
eoo�omic shi(is occur to outstate airpotts do malntain 7ust-indime' schedutes?
2. landba�king
OPTfON 1. aPPOSE LANDBANKINO IF PROPOSED AS PART OF THE OUAL-TRACK PIANNING
PROCES3. The u�certainty introduoed fo� dtizens of Oakota Cou�iy is ihe �imary resso� for opposing arty
la�dba�king proposat. Furthe�. tandbaaking oouid resutt in decreaseC tax hese (if MAC aaquires ihe land} e�d
potentialty lncxeased onviro�montal segraQation as the result of incxeased fam�ing of leased Isnd by persons w+th less
incentive to apply a high slar�dard of ag�icuftural care. �
OPTiON 2. DEIAY ANY POSITION ON LANDBANKING. Since landbanking is not spociFcally an
altemative unGer consi6eratio� in the Oua(-Tradc Airpori Planning Process, the Board af Commissioners oould defe�
any positioa on this issue as specufative at the currer�t time.
OPTION 3. SUPPORT 1AN08ANKING. Landbanking might bc supported as a prudent hedge againsi the
���d !o� a future new airporl and the potenGal absence o( la�d due to continue devefopmeni in the region tor a new
airpoR. �
STAF�_RECOMMENOATIpN • ..
While not all studies in the Duaf-Track Airport Planning Process have been completed. there is suificient eviCence
and raason for the Board of Commissianecs to adopt a position in opposition lo the retocation of a new major .
iatemafional ai�on to Dakola County. There also Is suffletent evidence of stg�lficaat noise mitigaGon �eeds !or
t��tthe�r� Oakota �oLnty communitie; if A1SP remains at its c�srrant siie. Therefa�e. in 8�y opt�on 5elet�ed by fhe
6oard, doise mitigalion to meet tfie �eeds of aorthern Oakata County communities is impetalive. In addnion. ther+e
a�e.su(ficient questions abouf 'laqdbanking' as an altemative to a decision to corislnact a new airpoK at this.time %r
tNe Boab of Commissioners to state ifs opposltion to sud� an attemative, should h be IntroQuced. Therefor+e, sYaff.
recomrr�end Option 2 amo�g the `Airport Opiions' a�Q Option 1 amoag the `Landbankirsg Options.'
Dakota County staff recommend that the Oakata County PhysTcat pevetopmeM Commlttee di�ed siaff to pr�paire a•
' resolatlon fo� action at the Cou�ty Board based on the discussions at the S.eptomber 26. 1995, Physical Deyelopment
Commiriee meeting. ' �
� �
l.oyis J. 8reim u, Director
PHYSICAL OEVEI.OPMENT OIVISION
�, �
.
� - � _. � ��l _! -
��
:, :.. /
. �. .
�
Attachmenfs
..�.. �-•. '�/...�•.....—
Jack Oitmo�e. Depuly Oi�ecto�
PHYSICAL OEVEI.OPMENT DIVISION
n�:na9-2s
.,«.•,,�,..
�•
�
09�22 '95 16�31 ID�DflKOTA COI�JTY PHYSICAL D FAX�612-891-7031
9
PRGE 12
I . I�
� vert� e a s�
e
. . ��.
Capac�ty Enhancem�nt Alternatives
_ ��
Baseline Future 1 �Futu�e 2
�5 . —15
� .{ � ■ r Oo Nothing } -
� � � Prode1on Runwny I�tonhor (PRf� — • �
�"' New •North Aare11�I Runiray 11N/2GN , �♦.
� �3 .... � � �13
� -- _. Now North/South Rry t7p5 f ' �,
� . New South Pardlo! Runway 1!S/?�S �
�-- 12 . . . N�► �,,. „w�H �a „S.� ' . I 12
. . � -
� •.. .� New Rwy� 17/SS and tiN/2�I� • I ♦
°11 i� � � o �"1y
"� �� � � . ' • � � ��
� oi •. � � � . �
�� 9 ' �' � ' .
�:�� , :, , . .. g .
cts � s, . . i � . �
L t �i
p � C � .
� d ' o) • . + I • • � �
� � � , � �J
� � � t •p) � ` � ; I �
� a � o� � 1
Q- 6
� � � -- i ♦ i . � . {�
c� � � � ! .
�;, 5 � , � . � � . . - - ; � 5
� � � � �i . ��
a� 4 ' •' ' � _-- ' ' � 4
� t , , , . ,, -
cts 3 � i _ ..---'�—� � , • •,r �j
L , , - - —� ••.��' � 3
Q`? _ , • -� r r -- s e , �' � +s ;
. , I
! r � r � � s • • �� �� �
� 2 ���rr�.... r' '� � � � i ' _ 2
..r--, �
1 ' ._ �
' 'I
;,,
420 444 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600
�' Total Annua! Aircraft �perations '000'-s at MSP
{ )
��ce: MSP Capacity Enhancement P(an, FAAlMAC, Dec�mber. 1993. • �
- ��hrh_�t 1
Qg�22 '95 16�31 ID�D�lCOTA COUN7Y PNYSIGAL D FAk�612-891-7031 PRGE 13 ' �
� � � � � �
� s s- ar►
Capa�i#y Enhancement Aiternative.�
�aseiine Future 1 � Future 2
�� , 15
� � � M ■ �o Nothing . � /�
� w.�■ P�oclsion Runwa�y lrtooiio� (PRM� � `t
�
�'' New �Nortit Pat�slta Run�ray 11i+il2iiN +
� �r � '� ♦r�
� � �7 .-.` _ . Now NorthJSouth Rwy 1�i35 � t 1 �7
._.
� New South Parailai Runway ttS12�S
�"' � � • • • Now Rwys ltt+t/?AN and !!Sl2QS ; �� . � G
O' w. �. Naw pwys 17/'J5 ttn� t 1 N/21iN t ♦
:� �� �: E � , ij
. ,
� i �! � � ' + � �
�,,, -- . . � .
� "� 1 i O
9 ' .�� _ ... . . .. g
� , � � � ,►
� $ t .�� . , � , . .
� ` � �i � + $
._ � � � � - � .
<t 7 � a � �, � ' • � , M ' ; � 7'
o ! �' E �
Q. o � a � ♦ j
6 �, .., , , 6
�a �
� � , , .
� . t i * ♦ � .•�� 5
� � � � � . � .-
4 � •� ' ' 4
� ,� f t . , ! - � M�, r,,, •
� t .•- � .
�- 3 f � ..�� r�~ .� s. �� 3
� - ' � ,r f. r.� ; # . � � ` � 1
y 1„ • - " ,..y � � . . - �, .r -�
� � �.. r �"� �- ���, � 'i � � • � _ �
.r •�"' � • 1
i
� � � � �
420 440 46t� 4$0 50Ci 520 540 56a 580 600
Total Annual Aircraft Operations (`00�'s� at M5P
�rce: MSP Capacity Enha�cement Plan, FAA/'MAC. Decamber, i993. .�V���t���
.. /t 1
�
:��r,.
I: �S�
09�22 '95 16:32
�
' f
• ��
C. I �
t �
.�� S
ti�.
.•i.
, ?� • �
. {�
����"�tit~ .�''i'��
•'%,•�•} 5�� ^»2�
1•�.��. tiati:
.'
' s
ID:I�KOTA CO�VTY PHYSICRI. D FAX�612-891-7031
2045 D1V'L �65 Noise Contaurs
. �
;
eorraeKr u.� e�m weocrerr
t� t�.�y w�a�.� W�►r+urd�
irL 1�o k a a��wY��twe.�y� M
W 4Mw rrtb� N�O�r��adf.a
�+Ir o.+ow uuwY �.�t.qoMw w i
v�{ �� rnfa t�Y �flca
&KC I�iw1oU�L1 Af I�! Caw�f4N7�
0
PAGE 14
. ' I .
. . I
.' , � •I . .
,l . � t•
..t: ' . .
. �::':':;r:' '-, • `''`'`il .�,
: i.. , �`• :: } :: � 1 '•~ • ' i
,•t�~•,�}�.i��� :..i+'• ��it � i$: �ir1•�:+;.r{� '+ .
�'�',t :1A � . ! '.t! :�1:�� k ' . I
� �`.:•;.ti �' •:tT;f, i :
.t�� :�A' ::1•'yt,�t.�; • , t�;
..• ::� �i�N l =. .
���. .:.l;. ,, � �`r`�.�i�y i. , .
' tr„ a{,. r.. ::i• i}� : �
'i . :?t. � . °
:S � ::S :' : f •V i•••': ' Y. �
��•tti�tt� �5�. ,•y, S, t
�'��. �'r� .
�1
p rr� �ne��l k n.tM..�1 e r I I�� M
�+rl�n �f Nr MnfA N �rW � eAt'�raY �t�
h� wr frrn �f i� s W w0 �V 7(v�ro� Mri
Maraitie�lr.6s.�ir.w. �ho�rRc�[�is
I
I
d
• . . !f'q�Vd iqi 0.kata Co7nLJ aaSot d Rtlt�{ltt�,l9iS. �
i
`l\�
�7� .
.,' � �A '�t a ` w � .� 2 `. . . r . v � 1} i"'�f/�"
1 t. !, l `. } .. t ' t. t � ,. � . [ � � � ,, ��
; +., t:,v-�,js�.43 , i r �e .. � ' t x _ �� �fy � � ''\
•�+,�. � 7'�;}s; 4ilt�f � �,,�� •T t 4.. .o ' . ..�. �.. y � ,�1�'�� � �'f r r � .. . ,�
fi� s ^��•:''� .��.ss �t� � !�a 'r� y�; �4 �,p'`* �} � y�tis.,a�- :�,i�3 `�ocY+ it � �.c�` +-• y .
� � .._ ..>. .t.,. �
� ^�1`:��irtitiT�; 'W.n 1TSl^ 1 �. S � ��}, ..� . ,n,,,. w � �i! �L' ; f.. -
"` � ;, s" t - —��,r � _ 3 � ' `:{� i ��,� p. ,�.' • �.
J�� �i iG�� �""' �1 � .. : + � ; .t^_ ,.�:t _,. r�..,. � �.. , • ; • .
.. _� �,,, � y ��;Ry i r�ri t , � ' ' - } _�� " . . • f
••� .. S •f`^.i.' �,��t..�+�s.� . .tir ,1 � �. F ^ • � , � l.
��: � a1 - : /,3 '4 i: . • �` i � Y� 7� ^r.• r' . '•t ' • . . . �� �'. ..'.
. r�^: .6�"� � 'f . ' �r , � t E »� t � .••`
�� ��v �''� 1 �,c�� ^� .�.`i!-� � � �i%�t..�: .� ���� ( . '".,�%�,
� f �fT� .�,r. .�"a:% r t!_�•.' ``i�I ' .; .� .
;'!r, s �' r �`•:�:'i i s E' j ti .F. _4 �,�t}l ���
5 � '„� �ry}� �. � �'�' .�. 1_,ii �f 1,) .� �.� ' �t1� �� ,'i` _
'• :
.- (
t , o � . 7 „ ` ,� '
�; ,�i �.► i r � . . ., 4 a � � �r! � � 3� , � � � f # � . � � �
l�., � � v
S ,`� k C�-�c'` > ` �
' ) � a� t� 1:J' � . . �. • .��.�. i� �nr � � � �. � r�i . ,"w ��'`� r *£ ...! - v.t _r p i. � '♦ "l -
: !. 1�'+Fi::3�j'?: "� !ti",� _. , 1L, i��� • ib `� C��y�' r F'�, .r. I ♦�'�Z +SAs�.` • c� {'
'!.:_�r,.3 ����a .�::x?�^�72:�r':.J � _t�.f?.i � fr.x:;�SrL�:��1 4•.�_%i�i�i _.3 �. d f ti.Y.. __�..'�•�SL'�..lf,�,G.,,
��IlrnW".'�+1t:4�'F+±aec�wmma-�w.fti�'i�-aw�a��.-.er.m c._a.+��..,�v..�-c�.- .n....A..,� __.�.... rv. , -..._. _,.. . n....,�c�.�rwtf�.�wevro`�
d
� �������
m'� :al,'� �1 .�ir. n�� �
�
�'. �i.r.��l��is�`�11���
� ��:�
:`:; ,�=; �i������p
������i �
'" """'�Y .~�A����9
..: :7fi7 +�i,,, ; �y��IF�1'� �
i::` :'v�.�VII/�fi�i7�1����
��~,�.'�M�'��r�����
.�.'
�:��i=.:� �� '
n����+ a+rwr,-
�1��� �.-��-„•
i
�.�.� : �`�.� �^!!�
■".�����! s.:F:►:4 ..�
� ��..�� ' � .�.� ... '��M�
■■Et�ir�::;.:.:. ' '. ��(;���c�
��i�.+�r,-,"�. s • t�. ' �,�,�,�.�
Q�� ' i 'r- f. i��lsx1 �'�83
+ .,
�� �� ' � �' f�-� ` , MP�` �4 ��`M
���i I� ~ ."'� � w': .L=��1� �r
�1�� `'� ��: �'' `''',� : :��;i
r � ,� � .,-. ,.
��!'��i�.`:�2:�. :.1�,..:��•'•i ����ii
:��/11�' �° "_ ;.: ;. i�
� ''�.b 't, ��
� r a_
�'r�ll�i/ '��°'�"� �„�'"!�
�■t,.�;a �-.1
� � r: •..
�'�.�� �.��1���,�1►'::
,/� '�'�i�i k`,,,� i�rj ���t�•:�� �'�'':: �f'=* ,
r,G'.1Ct�.�e:ow����fL��.�a::."l�v.:...�� ��
�. �r+a}v�.v e::�wr a. �:.; •�•.�:•;�i.�.,rwr�+�.�;�--..:. ti�c �.. c-yS! �1
Ci WSP� ���r �-�h`���Y:;.::C:i�C'u�b:;�ku �G'����..t1'
=�,�; ������� _�, ��;Y:,�o��a����—�
i,� as���� �.� ��:�_:;�;����e !!��
��� 1���:�1
=�f. -=i7TI 7
l. .. �?.a�L<r
�•:��:�: � i•r �
��r�' �:._ �r�
. �;.......
r..i r�
.
�.�
W' �i:. .
09� ' 95 16 : 34 I D� D�COTA CQI�f'f Y PI-!YS I CAI.. D FAk � 612-891-?43i
Agricul�ure Preserve Land withim Praposed Airp►ort Site
�rrarGHY se95, UaKo� CatxYi'Y
k dt�+rittg ic nni�wt a tapsHy eacosdmd map Ao� � sur`aY anQ i4 tt� Iniat�dad Ta ba ased �s asa
� drwri�p ia a oomoMadoe� ot nrordc �sitormeaort a�+d dsa� k�c.ted in wrtocta cTtic cocrnty. ccaoe
;;;;: lS�f11 OHiW G MSI Oti�O� iFQurOe�, #ifoctl�Q tlf� ara� fhaMl�l. 1fld (i Tq EIO iicOd (W �arfO(ERoe yV/pOf�t
��� E►�kataCourrtylsnotnapoe�dhbloranyin�cax�ad�cAanalnoontilr�rd. itdlsaonrtaioc�ro
st�d di:M Coniaci tl�ic ct�taa . ,
ufp: ��kot� County Awe��sa . �888.
. Y
.. . h�•�d 8,�: D,ka4 C.�cx Qti3ce d2t.uata�,1395.
09�22 '95 16:35 ID:DRKOTA COUNTY PHYSICAL D FAx�612-891-7031
Prime Farmland within Proposed Airport�;�i
� r� ��a c� A�� .
� Ofhat� Fara�laad (S,�25 Ac�ea) �
PAGE 18
�•• • y•� •�••.•�. �.••r.•• r•x w� w.� m.v .•w V �n w/ t•u w � �w aqouvofa av w V wv �r wp
iied�awlnp is a eompil�Llon d ncord5lniormation ar� day IoeaLd in wriwa dlx oo�fnty, etata
iQ (�Q��d attlo�s u�d osh�r souroo�. �ttwcip ti�o �ea Q�vwa «►d i� to Oe 4so4 ta ra(wstKw Wryo«•
��a� ��lo� omu dblo fm anr inacwradac h�nin ca+uL+ad. 1! dicciaymncias us
wnr: Oatat� CountY 6at1 Su�wx 188Q.
�
� -�_
I�.
Tr��red bn Dafc�ta Coml� OMca atplmubit. t�/-
0922 ' 95 16 � 36
.�
I D� D�lKOTA CQl�1TY PHYS I C�. D FAX � 612-891-7031
ENVIRONMENTAI ISSUES RECENiNO DETAILEO ANALYSIS IN EIS
o Air Quafity '
o Archaeotogical Resouroes
o Biotic Communities
0 6ird Aircraft Hazards
o Construction lmpacts
o Economic Impads
o Enda�gered ar�d Th�eate�ed SpeGes '
o E�ergy Supply and Natural Resources
o Fam�land _ . .
o Floodplai�slNyG�otogy
o HistocidArchttectura! Resources
o � induced Socioeconomic Impads
� , La�d Use .
o Light Ert�issions •
o Airc,raft Noise '
u M�tor �►'eh;c!e Noi�e
o �' Parks and Recreation
Sedion 4(� l.ands
� Site Prese�vatlon �
� Sociallmpads
�� . Transportation Impacts .
o Major Utilltles _
a Visuat lmpac#s
� Wastewafer
� Water Supply
� Surface Water Qualiiy
o Grou�dwaterlHyd�oQeoiogy
o Wetla�ds
� Wildlifo Refuges
� Wild a�d Scenic Riveis
� ..
EXHIBIT 2.
PAGE 19 '
Q9/22/95 16:22 FAX 612 452 8840 MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�*��*�*:�x�x*s��x*x:�**xs*s$*
s*s� ACTIVITY REPORT *�c�
sx�ss��*ssx**ss�*as�*�s*x��
RECEPTION OK
T%/R% N0.
CONNECTiON TEL
CONNECTION ID
START TIME
USAGE TIME
PAGES
RESULT
.
4
4617
612 891 7031
09/22 16:09
i2fss
19
OR
a
lQ 001 �
Cil
!f,
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLIITION
SIIPPORTING A TIMELY AND PARTICIPATIVE PROCESS
FOR DAROTA COIINTY'S CONSIDERATION
OF A DIIAL TRACR AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS POSITION
AHEREAS, the Dakota County Board has 'expressed an intent to
consider a position in the Dual Track Airport Planning Process
opposing relocation of the airport and/or landbanking, and
WHEREAS, the citizens of Dakota County will be significantly and
differentially affected regardless of the track chosen in the Dual
Track Airport Process, and
WHEREAS, all of Dakota County's citizens and cities should be given
ample opportunity to participate meaningfully in the County's
decision making process, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has actively participated in the Dual
Track Process from its inception and has begun its own formal
review and public comment process which will culminate in December
to determine whether to support either expansion or relocation of
the airport, and
AHEREAS, Dakota County has an obligation to support the interests
and needs of all of its residents and businesses,
NOA, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan:
1. Requests that Dakota County's decision on the Dual Track
Airport Planning Process be delayed until the City of gagan's
position is determined. ;
2. Reiterates its strong encouragement that the County thoroughly
consider all impacts of both airport alternatives including
their costs and benefits for all Dakota County residents
before making a decision. In particular, because significant
attention has been given to the costs and impacts of the
alternatives, the City urges the County to recognize that
certain benefits would accrue to the County in association
with either expansion of the current airport or construction
of a new airport southeast of the metropolitan area.
3. Encourages the County to hold public hearings, conduct public
opinion survey r�search or use other means to engage all
' potentially affected residents and businesses about the issue.
4. Encourages the County to inform the public in a balanced and
unbiased manner regarding the benefits and consequences of
each alternative to provide a reasonable basis for public
input.
5. Encourages the County to support adequate and appropriate
mitigation of financial, environmental and pub�lic service
impacts regardless of the airport alternativei ultimately
selected by the State of Minnesota, such mitigation to include
at a minimum the recommendations developed by the I�Ietropolitan
Council in collaboration with both the communities�adjacent to
the new airport site and the communities adjacent to the
e�cpanded airport site. In addition, the City encourages the
County to support noise abatement operating procedures
regardless of the alternative selected. i
6. Opposes, as a matter of principle, County funding of special
interest groups for lobbying purposes. If the County chooses
to contract with SOAR, equal funding should be provided for
interest groups supporting other alternatives. I�
7. Stresses that more County residents will b�e affected
environmentally by expansion of the current airport than will
be affected by the relocated airport. By distance from a
runway end, approximately 245,000 of the County's 300,000
residents will be closer to an e}cpanded MSP than'the Dakota
County site. In addition, because the ��,�predominant
destinations from MSP are southeast, south and southwest of
the Twin Cities, the most populous portions of the' �County will
be more affected by expansion of the current site than will be
affected by relocation. ;I
8. Urges the County to enact regulations to restrict,development
and preserve the proposed new airport site in perpetuity for
agricultural uses if the preservation of agricultural land is
a.sufficient priority to oppose airport relocation.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By: Signed
Its I f ayor
Attest: Sicrned
Its Clerk
Motion made by: Hunter
Seconded by: Masin
Those in favor: All
�
Those against: None �
Dated: September 20, 1995
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof
assembled this 20th day of September, 1995.
Signed
E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
�f.
�
Dakota County Population by
Proximity to Airport Alternative
{1994 Estima�es}
Closer to Expanded MSP
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lilyda2e
Mendota
Mendata Heights
Sout�h St . Faul
West St. PauZ
Inver Grove Heights
Lakeville
Rosemount
Farmington
Hastings
Townships
Tatals
Dakota Caunty
5
38,261
53,363
54,957
542
166
10,466
20,235
19,304
Za,oaa
20,OQ0
7,040
246,294 (82�)
29$,679
0
b
Closer
�j New Airport
�� 2, 332
}l0,1h9
3,478
'� 6, 574
'15,143
!13,709
�
52,385 (18�}
I�
Board af Commissioners
Connty Commissioner Districts, Baard of Commissioners, Cammittees of the �Vhole, Meetings, and Appointments.
.� �
u
�
r�Es=
sr. v� .
�K SQIJT{'i
'� �x: ST.PAtlL
� � _. D�SYAICi a
�!%,�K�i�TA cC��UNTY
r�t7�ftil�SSl��t�E�' t1��STF'��'TS
t'�3'
Z
��
' _ ��, _ _.�..�� { ._ 1
, �,� � I
r .
vsT�c • � I ; � ' .
. QPIRE � VER�IILLION � � R11YEMtA
i �
t� ��.. _� t WRSFIAN i t
! �
�t
� ' D� ST�l�T f � �
.�....r = — -- — � -- -- '--- ' -- -- __ _
�_� r t
� ' �_ � �� vat�
: �
' � � � � 4� � �.r .�;
� G�S'ILE RQQt � HAIPTUI'i �S j (— �
� � � ! 1
1
� � t
1 �
� � �
1
I �
t f�..� 1
..�.�..�.. ,.��1�...����?...� � �.�..�..����
� � ' i�r�N
` � ( �,� _�
a�mru.� ( � saas�
. :�' � . '_ i 1u►TE�t1RD � � . .
._ . .. . . .r' .... . .i. . . " I ' . ' . . .
� 1 I � .
rw++s�rs acL+r
:v .. ; j ..
: