07-09-1997 ARC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
AGENDA
July 9, 1997 - 7 p.m. - Large Conference Room
1. Call to Order - 7 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of June 1 1, 1997 Meeting Minutes.
4. Unfinished and New Business:
a. Update Airport Action Plan
b. Discuss Joint Workshop for Northern Dakota County Airport Relations' I
Commissioners �
�
5. Updates �
i
a. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles
b. Eagan Letter of Response to FAA on Non-Simultaneous Departures
c. National NOISE Conference in Eagan on July 23-26
I
7. Acknowledge Receiat of Various Reports/Correspondence:
a. MASAC Agenda for June 24, 1997 and May 27, 1997 Minutes
b. MASAC's Technical Advisor's Report for May 1997
c. MASAC's Monthly Complaint Summary for May 1997
d. MASAC's Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for May 1997
e. Airport Noise Report for June 23, 1997
g. Eagan ARC Agenda for July 8, 1997
h. MAC 1996 Report to the Public and MSP Skyway to 2020 Report
8. Other Comments or Concerns.
9. Adjourn. '
Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a
notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to
provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City
Administration at 452-1850 with requests ',
_
= t t
i•
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
LIT.
AGENDA
COUNCIL
Ge�eral Meetinq
June 24, 1997
7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m.
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Call to Order, Roll Call
Approval of Minutes of Meeting May 27, 1997
Introduction of Invited Guests �
Receipt of Communications
Technical Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and
Summary
ANOMS Update — Chad Leqve, MAC
C�ossing in the Cooridor Update — FAA
Report of the MAC Commission Meeting
Persons Wishing to Address the Council
Other Items Not on the Agenda
Adjournment
�
�`'� %/��'
Next Meeting:
July 22, 1997
int
MINUTES
METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL
GENERAL MEETING
May 27, 1997
7:30 p.m.
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Call to Order. Roll Call
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:40 p.m. and
asked to call the roll. The following members were in attendance.
BobJohnson
Mark Salmen
Jennifer Sayre
Michael Anderson
Mike Geyer
Charles Curry
Dick Keinz
John Smith
Craig Wruck
Steve Minn
John Richter
Joe Lee
Pamela Nelms
Carol McGuire
Dawn Weitzel
Kristal Stokes
Petrona Lee
Jill Smith
Lance Staricha
Jon Hohenstein
Ed Porter
Jim Hollenbeck
Manny Camilon
Dale Hammons
Glenda Spiotta
Advisors
John Aamot
Traci Erickson
Chad Leqve
M BAA
NWA
NWA
Airborne �
UPS
ALPA
MAC (
Minneapolis Chamt
St. Paul Area Chan
Minneapolis I
Minneapolis �
Minneapolis �
Minneapolis
St: Paul ;
Richfield 1
Richfield �
Bloomington �
Mendota Heights �
Eagan
Eagan
Burnsville
Burnsville
St. Louis Park
Inver Grove Height
Sunfish Lake i
FAA
Technical Advisor
MAC
secretary was
of Comm.
r of Comm.
Visitors
None Listed
2. A�proval of Minutes
The minutes of the April 22, 1997 meeting were approved as distributed.
3. Introduction of invited quests
Receipt of Communications
There were no invited guests. Minneapolis Council Member, Steve Minn, introduced himself as
James Serrin's alternate for the City of Minneapolis. C
Chairman Johnson said a couple of letters were received over the past month regarding a block
in Richfield that would like to be considered for the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. �
Chairman Johnson explained that MASAC was not authorized to change or modify the federal
rules regarding Part 150 eligibility. He said the residents' representatives would have a chance
to speak at the end of the meeting. �
4. Technical Advisor's Runwav Svstem Utilization Report and Complaint Summarv
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, presented the April, 1997 Technical Advisor's Report.
The highlights of the report are as follows:
0
➢
Traci apologized for not being able to mail the Technical Advisor's report with the agenda,
but would make a concerted effort to include that information in next month's mailing. �
Traci pointed out that the ANOMS count for April 1996 was not available due to problems
encountered last year when the FAA moved into its new tower location.
➢ Daily Operations from the FAA Airpo�t Traffic Record have increased over last month
(March 1997) from 1306 to 1363. This increase is largely due to an increase in commuter
and general aviation operations, not air carrier jets.
➢ The number of complaints regarding ground noise increased over last month. Traci said
she checked the run-up logs to check if one run-up pad had been used more than the
others and found that the run-ups had been spread out. She said that there had been a lot
of maintenance done during the month.
John Richter, Minneapolis, asked at what time the run-ups had been done. Traci said that
they were primarily during the day. Each nighttime run-up had a written explanation as to
why each aircraft had to be run-up at night, as is required by the MSP field rule. Mr. Richter
asked how many were at night. Traci said she did not have the exact number, but that it
was a handful.
Joe Lee, Minneapolis asked Traci why there were a large number of arrivals over Minneapolis
over the past weekend. Traci said that there were very strong winds that required departures
and arrivals on the 11's.
2
5
�
>
➢
9
➢
i
Traci noted that although the percentage of available time for runway use :on runway 29
over Minneapolis had increased, the actual number of operations was low�according to the
Community Ove►flight Analysis. t
Traci reiterated that the April 1996 data was not available. �
�
Traci noted that that only 4.7 days of ANOMS data was missing this month, which was an
improvement over the 8 days that were missing from last month. �
Traci noted that there was no data available for April 6�' because the network's operating
system was changed and the back-up systems were not set up correctly. �iJoe Lee,
Minneapolis, asked if that day had been figured into the analyses. Traci said that it hadn't.
ANOMS Update
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, briefed the council on the problems with th'�
diskpack reader. She said the system is continuing to lose data. She also sa
had switched over to an optical disk reader two weeks prior (2 months earlier�
Traci said that there is no longer a way to read the data. The two options stai
obtaining authorization to p�ocure direct connect capabilities or using an optic
an optical disk reader is used, the data will need to be converted into a formai
use. Traci said staff is no longer able to impo�t data into ANOMS and the Ma
Advisor's report will not be complete. Traci noted that the MAC fully supports
program because of its impact on a number of projects. i
Chairman Johnson asked Traci to brief the council on the status of the Differe
Positioning System (DGPS) ground station. Traci told members that the com�
DGPS ground station was on schedule for commissioning by the end of June�.
that during the AAAE conference, Honeywell and staff hosted flights on Hone�
flies against the DGPS. She noted that a number of decision makers were inv
Traci said aircraft certified to fly against the system will be allowed to use it.
Continental Airlines is the only carrier to have aircraft prepared for certificat
ANOMS
� that the FAA
han expected).
is looking at is
il disk reader. If
that ANOMS can
Technical
:he ANOMS
tial Global
issioning of the
Traci mentioned
vell's G4, which
�d on the flights.
rrently,
Chad Leqve, MAC, reiterated that there are a number of players that will have to work together
in order to get the DGPS system to a point where it can be used for noise abatement purposes.
He said the FAA, the air ca�riers and the airport will all have to work together to fully utilize the
technology. He said that it will be a big cultural change for the FAA because of how the
airspace could change around the airport. �
Ed Porter, Burnsville, asked what the expected time frame was to have the DGPS system
operating fully. Traci Erickson said that it was in the FAA's strategic plan to li i ve sole GPS by
the year 2010.
Citv of Sunfish Lake and DHL Airwavs Membership Vote
Chairman Johnson introduced the Executive Committee recommendation to
and DHL AinNays to the MASAC membership roster:
3
Sunfish Lake
Article II (4) is hereby emended to adjust #he composition of the Council representation as follows:
Replace "one Representative from the Cargo Air Carriers" with "two Representatives from the Carga Air
Carriers"
And
Add "ane Representative from the City of Sunfish i ake"
Mark Salmen, NWA, mo#ioned and Glenda Spiotta, Sunfish Lake, seconded to accept bath
Sunfish Lake anci DHL Airways as fuli members of MASAC and ta change the by-iaws, as such.
A general discussion ensued regarding membership representatian as it corresponds ta noise
impact. John Richter, Minneapolis, asked Chairman Johnson if a time could be set for an
Executive Committee meeting to discuss passible changes to membership representation.
Chairman Johnson said he was not prepared to set a date at that time but would schedule one.
Glenda Spiotta, Sunfish Lake, tald council members that Sunfish Lake desired to be part of the
aircraft noise soiu#ion and not part af #he repres�ntaiion problem.
A va#e was taken. The ma#ion passed unanimously
7. MASAC Bv-Law Quorum Ret�uiremen#s Vote
Chairman Johnson introduced #he motion far the amendment to Article lV (1) as:
8trike all existing language and replace with the following:
"At all meetings of the Council, attendance by four (4) USER representatives and four (4) PUBLIC
represeniatives shalE canstitute a Guocum for ttse conduct af business, pravided that no action reiated
to an item not on the published meeting agenda or #o the establishment of the budget, or which
wil! �esult in a change in the budget, shall be taken unless there are in attendance and voting thereon
at least sixfeen (16} representatives."
JiIE Smith, Mendota Heights, said she disagreed with the concepi af having less than a majority
of inembers constitute a quorum. She suggested that a quorum constitute one more than half
{18} af the eiigibie vo#ing membe�s in any confguratian. She said she believed eight members
was not an appropriate number of inembers to make decisions.
Jahn Richter, Minneapolis, moved to table the vo#e. A voice vote was taken and the mation
passed.
8. Naise Abatement Depa�ture Profiles (NADPs) Vote
Traci Erickson, Technica) Advisor, presented staff s recommendation in regards to NADPs.
She reiterated that currentiy the distant departure procedure was being used off a11 runway
ends.
Staff recommended that the "clase-in" procedure be adopted for departures aff runway 29 UR
and #he "distan#" procedure be adopted for #he remaining runways {04,22,11 !1R}. Traci said
this recommendation was based on what would benefit the airpork's surrounding communities
as a whoie. Traci said the secand recammencfation was to leave the NADPs as they were
�
( 1
(distant off ail ends). Traci said that the reason for the second recommendation is because the
effect will continue to become smaller and smaller due to the increase in the ni�mber of Stage
III aircraft that will be used. In the year 2000 when there are only Stage III aircraft, the
differences will become negligible. ` •
I
Chairman Johnson then presented a letter from the City of Mendota Heights that included a
�esolution from the City to formally request that MASAC adopt the "close-in" departure profile
for 11 UR. Kevin Batchelder from the City of Mendota Heights said that the city adopted this
resolution because there were 470 residential parcels in Mendota Heights that"; would benefit
from the "close-in" procedure within the 65 DNL. �
i
Jill Smith, Mendota Heights, explained that one of the reasons for the resolution is because the
annoyance level for noise increases logarithmically. She said even a small decrease in noise
levels would have a great affect for those closest to the airport. She also noted that the 470
residential parcels did not include two large apartment complexes and two major schools.
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, said she agreed that the close-in procedurel would benefit
Mendota Heights most, but as a whole, the distant procedure would affect mo�re parcels off of
11 UR fo� all communities to the south and east end of the airport. i
Chairman Johnson asked Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, to give Eagan's position. Mr. Hohenstein
said that Eagan's position was to support staff s recommendation. ,I�
Kevin Batchelder and Jill Smith of the City of Mendota Heights reiterated that those people
closest to the airport should be given priority because they experience the hig�hest level of
noise. I
�
Dawn Weitzel, Richfield, said she did not feel she was prepared to vote on the� NADP issue.
She noted that the information she had from past meetings regarding this issue did not
correspond with the information she received at the last meeting. She said she had written a
letter to John Foggia and had called and left messages for him so that she could get additional
information on the issue. She said Mr. Foggia had not responded. ;�
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, explained that the data being used for the NADP analysis is
parcel data from the individual cities rather than the census data from 1990, which was not
accurate. She said that this was why the numbers from past analysis and the� jpresent analysis
did not add up. I
John Richter, Minneapolis, said that he backed the City of Mendota Heights' rE
it affected those closest to the airport.
Charles Curry, ALPA, said he supported staff's recommendation and that the �
vote on the issue rather than table it once again. �
Steve Minn, Minneapolis, asked for clarification from staff on why the option oi
in procedure for both 11 VR and 29 UR was not a recommended option. �
I
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, said that staff looked strictly at which proce
benefit the most parcels off all ends of the runways, without prejudice to any o
5
because
uncil needed to
having the close-
e would
community.
Steve Minn, Minneapolis, motioned and Jill Smith, Mendota Heights, seconded to recommend
the close-in departure profile for runways11 UR and 29 UR, and the distant departure profile for
runway 04/22.
The motion was voted on with a voice vote. Chairman Johnson then determined that a show of
hands was necessary. Both the Chairman and the Secretary counted the number of hands for
and against. The motion was defeated by a vote of 11 to 8.
Craig Wruck, St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, motioned and Charles Curry, ALPA,
seconded to recommend the close-in departure profile for runways 29 UR and the distant
procedure off 11 L/R, 04 and 22. Both the Chairman and the Secretary counted the number for
and against the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 13 to 7.
9. Report of the MAC Commission Meetinq
Chairman Johnson briefed the council on the May Commission meeting. He said the two main
items discussed were the Balchen Post Award, which MSP won for snow removal this past
winter season, and the lack of fire protection at the reliever airports.
10. Persons Wishinq to Address the Council
Chairman Johnson explained that there were several Richfield residents present who had
concerns with the fact that their block was not intersected by the Part 150 1996 65 DNL
Contour. �
Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, introduced and explained the MSP Noise Mitigation
Committee recommendations as they pertained to the Sound Insulation Program.
Chairman Johnson explained that there are a number of blocks right outside the contours that
are in the same predicament. He said in the next program many of these problems will be
ironed out.
Dick Keinz, MAC, mentioned that the Richfield residents' concerns would be better addressed
at the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting. Chairman Johnson explained that the PAC
helps develop policies on the Sound Insulation Program. He said that the next meeting had just
been set for June 17`�' at 12:00 p.m. and was open to the public. A resident asked why these
meetings weren't publicized better. Chairman Johnson explained that the PAC meetings were
not on a regular basis like MASAC. He said residents should contact their city representative
for dates and times.
One resident noted that he thought he would get a better response if he were to call the
complaint line more often because of the number of reports generated regarding complaints.
Traci Erickson explained that the complaint reports were strictly for informational use. She said
that decisions were not made based on the number of complaints in any certain area.
Residents also had questions about early morning flights (6:00 a.m.) over Richfield. Traci
Erickson explained at that time in the morning there is a big departure push. She said traffic is
normally operates off the parallels either to the Northwest or the Southeast, depending on the
L
11
Weather.
Phii McKeown, a Richfeid resident, tald the council abaut when the MAC man
home (about 6 or 7 years ago). He said the person doing the manitoring left tt
device in his home for one day and came back a# the end of the day ta pick it ��
particular day the planes were operating mainly to the Southeast. He said no';
monito�ing was dane a# his home after that. �'
I
Steve Minn, Minneapaiis, asked about expanding the number af remote maniti
the current number of 24. Traci Erickson, Technical Advisor, explained that th�
noise at the current pofes is nat used in generating the contours. She said the
modeied using a number of generaiized criteria. Traci said that the reason act
noise is not an input for the contours is because not all airporks have the equEp
ac#uai noise. She said additianai pales have not been purchased because thE
in doing so. I �
A Richfield r�sident asked if staff had information on how the actual noise lev
#he current eantours and, ifi so, how they campared. Traci Erie3eson said they
noise data is higher than the contours show. She said the FAA is aware of th
A member of the audience asked if any of the members or staff knew about te
canducted at C�'Hare Airpa�t in regards ta 22-second departure intervals. No�
these tests. John Aamot, FAA, said the FAA does nat use seconds to determ
plane departs. �
�
Ed Porter, Burnsviile, remarked that he felt there needed to be more time to di
regarding voting items. He said he was unaware of same of the issues brougt
meeting. !
Other Items Not on the Agenda
There were no other items.
12. Adjaurnment
Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 9:3Q p.m.
Respectfully submitted
Melissa Scovranski, MASAC Secre#ary
7
red noise in his
monitoring
He said that
ditional
�rirtg towers from
� monitored
contaurs are
�al monitored
nent #a monitor
re is no benefi#
� compared with
d and the actuai
discrepancy.
:s being
�e had heard af
e when the next
:uss issues
up at the
a
MINUTES
MASAC OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
June 13, 1997
The meeting was held at the Metropolitan Airports Commission West Terminal
ANSP Conference Room and called to order at 10:05 a.m.
The following members were in attendance:
Mark Salmen, Chairman - NWA
Bob Johnson - MBAA
John Nelson - Bloomington
Tom Hueg — St. Paul
Dick Keinz — MAC
Joe Lee — Minneapolis
James Serrin — Minneapolis
Charles Curry — ALPA
Mayor Charles Mertensotto — Mendota Heights
Kevin Batchelder - Mendota Heights
AdvjSOry:
Ronald Crabill - FAA
Chad Leqve - MAC
John Foggia - MAC
AGENDA
ilding MAC
John Nelson, Bloomington, introduced Mauhamad Adam who is inteming with"the City of
Bloomington. �I
Chairman Salmen introduced a letter from the City of Eagan that was sent to the�Operations
Committee asking for a study regarding the portion of operations not complying with the
Eagan-Mendota Heights corridor procedure resulting from headings issued �outside the
cooridor parameters in order to avoid unsafe flying conditions, such as storm systems
southeast of the airport. � �
. i
Chairman Salmen said the letter would be referred to the MASAC Chairman for assignment.
M/NNEAPOLIS STRAIGHT-OUT DEPARTURE ANALYSIS OUTL/NE
Chairman Salmen asked Jim Serrin, Minneapolis, and Joe Lee, Minneapolis, to inf�oduce their
proposal regarding straight-out departures off 29R. Mr. Lee and Mr. Serrin said that since
those residences straight off runway 29R experience all arrivals onto 11 L, departures off 29R
1
f � . '
should be directed in a heading other than runway heading. Mr. Serrin and Mr. Lee illustrated
on the 1996 FAR Part 150 Study Update contour map an area north of runway heading off 29R
that experiences few overflights. They proposed that all departures that would normally be
given a runway heading off 29R be given a heading other than runway heading.
Mr. Lee and Mr. Serrin recognized the fact that there could be nothing done about the straight-in
arrivals. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked if Mr. Serrin and Mr. Lee had specific headings in mind.
Mr. Serrin and Mr. Lee said they did not have specific headings in mind, nor did they have any
proposal as to when the turns could take place.
Chairman Salmen said that the issue of where aircraft transition into the national airspace was
important, as well.
Chad Leqve, MAC, introduced the proposed outline of the straight-out departure analysis staff had
developed. (The Straight-Out Departure Gate Analysis Outline is attached.) Chad reiterated only
departures in that area of interest would be analyzed.
Chad also reviewed an earlier analysis done for this proposal that showed, over a ten-day period in
December of 1995, that 23% of departures off the No►th 29 Parallel runway were straight out
departures. The total number of departures for 29L and 29R was 1,811, with 11.6% of those being
straight-out departures. The total number of departures off 29R was 746, 23% of which were
straight out. The total number of departues off 29L was 1065, 4% of which were straight out. Chad
stated that they had to keep in mind the FAA would have to agree with any proposal.
It was agreed that the findings of the gate analysis would be completed by and reviewed at the next
Operations Committee Meeting on July 15�', which was changed from July 11�' due to a schedule
conflict. The findings would then be presented to MASAC at the July 22nd regular meeting.
Jim Semn, Minneapolis, said he had concems about where the gates were constructed. He said
he would like staff to construct an additional gate between 2.5 and 5 miles out to capture some of
the tums. Chad said that since staff would only be studying the straight out departures and the
tums did not have to be analyzed at this point.
Chad reiterated that any proposal would have to be reasonable relative to the FAA (EIS). John
Foggia, MAC, reiterated that an Environmental Assessment (EA) would have to be done, hopefully
with a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
John Nelson, Bloomington, asked what timeframe would be analyzed. Chad Leqve, MAC, said that
the analysis would include timeframes when there is a healthy amount of straight-out departures.
Chad said that although the FAA won't issue headings seasonally, the analysis would analyze
seasonalchanges.
Jim Serrin, Minneapolis, asked if an analysis could be done for runway 29L, as well. Chad said it
could be done easily. A gate could be constructed 20 degrees off that centerline, as with 29R.
" r . r y
John Nelson, Bloamington, motioned and Joe Lee, Minneapolis secanded to
anaiyze the feasibiliiy of adjus#ing departure headings on 29R and 29�.
Committes recommends the ARTS data used to conduct the study reflect s
and include sufficient numbe�s af operatians to accura#e1y depici departure
runways 29R and 29L. The methad' used to review the ARTS data shall
p�apasal presented by MAC staff.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:4Q a.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Melissa Scovronski
Committee Secretary
TOPIC FOR THE JULY 15 1997 MEETING
Minneapaiis Straight-aut Departure Ana(ysis
The'
�
fa
MAC staff
�perations
iai factors
E1CFS Off 4�
� the gate
MSP PART 150 RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAM
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT: As of JUNE 20,1997
As of June 20, 1997, MAC has completed sound insulation modifications on a
total of Z,973 homes since the program began in 1992. An additional 375 homes
are currently involved in either the Pre-Construction or Construction phases. The
following tables summarize a"city-specific" breakdown of these total homes.
� �� � ,� �_ ►I ' : . � 1 � U l7:�►�► i�f►�:1�i ..�i �L1�117�.�i1
COMPLETED HOMES
*HOMES IN PROCESS
2,055 520
342 27
158
�
167
u: ':: I ':� ::►� . u►�::
2
73 2,973
4 375
Year Worlcscope Year y Cost Averaee Cost Per Home (construction & administration costsl
1992 139 Homes $4.4M $28,500 ($22,500 construction, $5,000 administration)
1993 244 Homes $5.9M $24,100 ($20,000 construction, $4,100 administration)
1994 600 omes $10:4M $"17,300—($1-5,000 construction; $2,300 administration)—
1995 840 Homes $14.SM $17,300 ($15,000 construction, $2,300 administration)
1996 1002 Homes $20.7M $19,100 ($16,800 construction, $2,300 administration)
1997 857 Homes $20.7M (Jan-Mar'97 bids) $24,220 ($21,420 construction, $2,800 administration)
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
JUNE 11, 1997
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commiss
on Wednesday, June 1 1, 1997 in the City Hall Large Conference Roorr
Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The foll�
members were present: Beaty, Leuman, Stein, Gross, Des Roches and �
Commissioner Fitzer was excused. Also present were City Administrat
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. �
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner May moved approval of the May 14, 1997 mi
corrections.
Commissioner Des Roches seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
AIRPORT NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
The Commission reviewed a list of Topics of Interest that the C
has discussed over the past three years. The list is as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ion was held
, 1 101
�wing
Vlay.
�r Kevin
with
mission
Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures '
Global Positioning Satellite Technology
Prevention of Third Parallel Runway
Nighttime Restrictions of Aircraft Operations �
Noise Measurement Issues: a. Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour
b. Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise
Operations Monitoring �System
(ANOMS) j
6. Equity of Current Runway Use System.
7. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles.
8. MSP Mitigation Committee.
9. MAC and MASAC Representation.
10. Phase Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft.
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES
�: s
1 1. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of
Existing Airport.
12. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues.
13. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use
Controls.
14. Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of Departure Over Minneapolis.
15. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise.
The Commission prioritized and updated the Topics of Interest. The
Commission was of the consensus that the following topics were of high
interest and should be monitored throughout the coming year:
1. MAC and MASAC Representation.
2. Equity of Current Runway Use System.
3. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles.
4. Global Positioning Satellite Technology.
5. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations.
The Commission was of the consensus that the following topics be
considered medium priority:
6. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of
Existing Airport.
7. Prevention of Third Parallel Runway.
8. Noise Measurement Issues.
9. MSP Mitigation Comprehensive Plan.
The Commission was of the consensus that the following topics be
considered low priority:
10. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues.
1 1. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures.
12. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use
Controls.
13. Phase Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft.
14. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise/Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of
Departure Over Minneapolis.
Commissioner Leuman inquired if the recent change in non-simultaneous
departure procedures is an official tower order. Batchelder stated he would
inquire with Bruce Wagoner, FAA Tower Chief. Leuman stated that an
airplane, on a daily basis, departs over the Mendakota Estates neighborhood
between the hours of 4:45 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. A discussion ensued
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES 2
regrading hours of operation at MSP and how the MAC has agreed to discuss
the hours of operation with airlines other than Northwest Airlines because
Northwest Airlines has voluntarily enforced these hours at MSP:� It was
noted that the other carriers at MSP have not agreed to enforcelthese hours
of operation. {
i
The Commission discussed Global Positioning Satellite Technology and the
fact that it will help shrink the Mendota Heights/Eagan Corridor.�I
Commissioner Gross stated that he is concerned that with this new
technology, a corridor may be maintained. Batchelder stated that the new
technology may allow the aircraft to land more frequently and at� the same
time. Batchelder suggested that the Commission consider inviting a speaker
to discuss GPS at an upcoming Airport Relations Commission meeting. Chair
Beaty suggested that Harold Pierce, of Honeywell, be invited to �speak on this
issue. He stated that Mr. Pierce has spoken to the Commission' in the past.
Regarding the prevention of the construction of the third parallel runway, the
Commission felt that this issue needs to be monitored. Administrator
Batchelder stated that this issue needs to be monitored since there is a
concern about MAC action on construction plans that have not been
approved through the Capital Improvement Plan. He informed tlie
Commission of recent discussions at the P&E Committee to extend Runway
4-22 to 12,000 feet. i�
Regarding Nighttime Restrictions, Batchelder stated that Northwest Airlines
voluntarily agreed to fly Stage III aircraft between the hours of 1�1:00 p.m.
and 6:00 a.m. Commissioner Des Roches suggested that the City focus on
requesting all other carriers adopt the same guidelines as Northwest Airlines.
She inquired if other carriers have enough Stage III aircrafts to accomplish
such a requirement. The Commission discussed how most nighttime
operations consist of cargo aircraft.
Regarding Noise Measurement Issues, the Commission felt that this is still an
issue and that the Commission needs to continue to monitor the�usefulness
of Ldn 65 contour and how to incorporate the ANOMS system into these
guidelines. ��
i
Regarding the Equity of Current Runway Use System, Administrator
Batchelder informed the Commission that City staff will continue to publish
information regarding the new north/south runway in its HeightslHighlites
newsletter. The Commission agreed to keep the public relations Yeffort strong
within the community. i�
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES
3
Regarding Noise Abatement Departure Profiles, Administrator Batchelder
informed the Commission that the Council adopted a Resolution requesting a
change in the departure procedures for the Mendota Heights-Eagan corridor.
Councilmember Smith attended the MASAC meeting and the City's request
was voted down, Ayes: 1 1 Nays: 8. The Commission discussed Mayor
Mertensotto's displeasure and how the Mayor is considering no longer being
a member of the MASAC. It was noted how the City of Mendota Heights
only has one vote on the MASAC as compared to the City of St. Paul who
has three votes.
Commissioner Des Roches inquired if the request could be reconsidered at a
future MASAC meeting. Batchelder stated the Mayor would like to discuss
this further. The Commission discussed how the MASAC Executive
Committee needs to review its By-Laws.
Regarding the MSP Mitigation Comprehensive Plan, the Commission noted
that the NDCARC has submitted a letter to Jeffrey Hamiel requesting that he
submit a time line of implementation. It was noted that the NDCARC will
follow up with this topic since implementation is important.
Regarding Phase Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft, the Commission confirmed
that this is in progress and is being implemented through a Federal mandate.
This should be low on the Commission's priority list.
Regarding the MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues, the
Commission discussed the construction of the north/south runway
construction slated to begin in 1998. The Commission felt that this topic is
important to monitor as the EIS will be available soon.
Regarding the Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related
Land Use Controls, Administrator Batchelder stated that the City will need to
update a new noise boundary to keep current with the Metropolitan Council's
land use planning guidelines.
Regarding Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise, Commissioner Gross suggested that
the City send a letter reminding the airlines to monitor this noise.
Regarding new topics of interest, Commissioner Stein stated that he believes
a mistake has been made in not moving the airport. He stated that he
believes the State has overlooked the cost and growth impacting the current
airport.
The Commission directed Administrator Batchelder to revise the action steps
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES 4
T
C-J
within the air noise plan and to submit the revisions to the Comrr
July. It was suggested that "strikeouts" be used and that compl
should be summarized in paragraph form only. j
Chair Beaty reminded the Commission that additional newspaper
should be a goal of the Commission.
DISCUSSION OF NWA FLEET PLANS
ission in
;ted steps
rage
The Commission acknowledged receipt of a report regarding Northwest
Airlines Fleet Plans. Chair Beaty stated he is surprised to see ho �w long
Northwest Airlines intends to use their DC-9 fleet. Leuman inquired if 727's
will be hushkitted. The Commission noted that 2,400 Northwest Airlines
employees live in Eagan, 400 less than Minneapolis. il
ROGER'S LAKE BOUNDARY BLOCK REQUEST
City Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that seven homes
have been added to the Roger's Lake boundary block area numbe� 22.
. f
FAA LETTER OF RESPONSE TO EAGAN ON �
NON-SIMULTANEOUS DEPARTURES ,
�
The Commission acknowledged receipt of a letter from the FAA to the City
of Eagan regarding non-simultaneous departures. The Commission felt that
the letter was excellent. �I
REAL ESTATE MARKET AND AIRPORT NOISE
The Commission acknowledged receipt of a report on Airport Noise Impacts
on Housing Values written by Hammer, Siler, George Associates�I Chair
Beaty stated that he is concerned with creating a problem without one really
being there. He stated that he does not want to create any housing
problems.
MASAC ACTION ON QUORUM VOTING
City Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that Cou
Smith attended the MASAC meeting where she recommended th�
quorum requirement be changed to 17. Batchelder stated that th
failed. He stated that discussion on this item will continue. �
AIRPORT NOISE REPORT
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES
�cilmember
it the
: motion
5
t
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Airport Noise Report - June 2,
1997 edition.
NOISE CONFERENCE
Administrator Batchelder stated that he would place this item on the
Council's agenda. Chair Beaty stated that he is interested in attending the
conference and that he is not able to attend all the seminars.
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS
REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Agenda for May 27,
1997 and April 22, 1997 Minutes.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technical Advisor's
Report for April 1997. Commissioner Stein stated that NWA seems to be
using a significant amount of their DC-9 fleet. The Commission noted that
the number of complaints are up from one year ago.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Corridor Gate
Penetration Analysis for April 1997.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the NDCARC Agenda for May 20,
1997 and Minutes for April 15, 1997.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the South Metro Airport Action
Council (SMAAC) Spring Membership Agenda.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Start Tribune Article of June 4,
1997 - Longer Runways - 4/22 & 1 1 R. Chair Beaty stated that he is
concerned that Laurie Blake, reporter, did not mention Mendota Heights
within her article.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Eagan ARC Agenda for June
10, 1997.
MISCELLANEOUS
The Commission discussed touring the new control tower. Administrator
Batchelder stated he would inquire with Bruce Wagoner.
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT REL4T/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES 6
0
I
�
.f �
Commissioner Gross stated that he would like to have informatio�n regarding
flight schedules of other air carriers servicing MSP. He stated he'is
interested in finding out nighttime procedures of other carriers. ';I
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commissioi
its meeting at 9:16 p.m. II
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
JUNE 11, 1997 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON MlNUTES
adjourned
7
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
July 3, 1997
To: Airport Relations Commission
_ ,
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Admiru
Subject: Airport Noise Plan of Action
DISCUSSION
The Commission annually reviews the Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan o
their June meeting. The Air Noise Plan of Action is intended to serve as a guide
statement to direct our actions, as it relates to airport operations and air noise in �1
community. The Coirunission stated their intent would be to present an updated �,
Plan of Action to the City Council in August. i'�
f Action at
jand a goals
Noise
Attached is a copy of an updated Air Noise Plan of Action based on the C� mmission's
review and discussion in June. Attached with the Air Noise Plan of Action is the updated
Topics of Interest - Updated and Prioritized, June 11, 1997 and an ugdated Focus Issues list.
Changes that have been made to the documents are shown in-s�ee��for deletions and in
.���„�,,..,,,.� �
E„�uufe for additions. �
The Commission should review the proposed changes to the Topics of Int
Focus Issues list and the Action Plan and provide direction to Kun Blaeser, Senic
for any final changes to be considered in August. The Commission will have an�
review and update the Action Plan at the August meetings before it is presented t
CounciL �
The Commission should also consider any issues that need to be added to'
Plan. I would suggest that all the past efforts, accomplishments and completed t�
,
shown in �ee� be summarized in a Report Card that would become part of th
for historical documentation purposes. �
ACTION REOUIRED
Consider the Air Noise Plan of Action provide direction to staff.
�est list, the
Secretary
�portunity to
City
ur Action
ts that are
Action Plan
MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
TOPICS OF INTEREST
Updated and Prioritized June 11, 1997
HIGH PRIORITY ISSUES
1. MAC and MASAC Representation.
2. Equity of Current Runway Use System.
3. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles.
4. Global Positioning Satellite Technology.
5. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations.
MEDIUM PRIORITY ISSUES
6. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of Existing
Airport.
7. Prevention of Third Parallel Runway - Monitoring Contract with MAC.
8. Noise Measurement Issues - a. Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour
b. Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations
Monitoring System (ANOMS).
9. Implementation of MSP Mitigation Committee's Comprehensive Plan.
LOW PRIORITY ISSUES
10. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues.
1 1. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures.
12. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use
Controls.
13. Phase Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft. _
14. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise and Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of
Departure Over Minneapolis.
TOPICS97.INT
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
FOCUS ISSUES
1. Noise Reduction Throu�h Modified Takeoff Procedures
A. -
B. Adoption of "Close In" vs. "Distant" Departure Procedures
C. Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations
D. Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor
2. Heighten Awareness of Mendota Hei�hts Air Noise Concerns
A. Advertising the MAC Air Noise Complaint Line
B. Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information
�
C. Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Comm
1
i
. • -�,,,,,����,,,,,,� ,.�,,,;;.....,�„�,,,., ,,.,,,,,.;,,.. .,; ,,... ,��,.- .�,�,,,,,,:�,,,,�,,,�„��„�, ;
� �'�d�coeate�"a j�table��V�'��.�Cj������e�,iFesentafion i
,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,�,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, �,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MSP Long Term Comnrehensive Plan {
�
„-•,,,,:`.,,��.��.,
.�
A. iiiii",..,iaiii�- iiiiii,.,��,;�...,iiiiiiiiiiiiii ,.i.��QIiItOL%�i.,i
;,,;�;�i�„° ,�/,f,�,�i,,,,�,�,.,,,,,,a�artle�,,;,�,t,�,n,�,� �
i
B. Implement "T^;�s ",r;+;,�^*;^r "T�ar_;n MSP Mitigation Committee'
.- - �,��,�„��,,.��,���.��,�%,,,,,
����e�iensLve Plan �
4. Conversion to Sta�e III Quieter Aircraft
5. Noise Reduction Throu�h Liti�ation
6. ��e �x��and Eli�ibilitv for Part 150 :
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Goal: Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which
Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure '
Action Steas:
�
� 11r..�+ In+t�� +� flA A i� r �� ��n+ir�� ��r��i�te
p^i-9E2'�tlff.'S--�R�f� .
� �@��R.,I�.-. .,.,�� ..h.�,��
,
�,...,..,.� �
¢
..;+� nn n � .,.,a +�,,,��Tn�n_
��. Pursue magnetic shift affect on
105 degree heading for 11 R
�
.-, ,,,�,,,a���ia.�i,,,,,,.�,�„�a� ,.•; ,...,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,...,,,,-��,�,.,,.,.,,,;,•;
:,,'�; ;G�ec�,�;e;st;;�;qp.�;��/'%„�o;,r,Nec�,,��,;d'ec;tEtat�;
fi..ai.�r.�iiiiiiiii.r..�i.i%.,,....;:. �„
,f�? � �e,9;�,�,��%„�� D Pj,s
Who When
��a##�
�#S ��d
dtG�tt �vl'Il�tt
�G:"'�
.�-
��
�
Staff/
ARC
�##
5�8�
- ..,,,,.,.,.:
; -,�,, �,��,,,,.�....,,,�„�,��.,�,,,.,,,��,��.������::,,,.,,,,....,,�,.���---, ,,....,,, ,,.. ,,,,... .
;�; „�o,n�toc�%„C;o;�tpi�anc�,-,,,v�rit,�;,To;wec;,�f;,c�e� St;affl
.;..; ..:.:..:
a;RC
, ,,,,--„���,,,.,�,,,,,�.,..,���....:-�, „�.�,/� „��,,�,,,���„<,.... �,,,,,,,,,,,�-:�.�,,,,- - - ,�„-.�
�� ;,E;ar%�r�,;;tV�oE,�t�,cr�„Ftrg�t5�i��:R`�q�re,st;,Co,�p;France Sta�
,:...,.
��4�C
,,,,,,,,,,,
�
���'
Following NSDP
Decision by FAA
��e�e�
:J�iil••�
,. �
-,,,,<-::�,,,,,.,.-
Cont�nous
A,.,,,,�.,
ugust
: .. , ,
a.
�
�
Issue:
Goal:
�
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures �
�
Adoption of "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to i
Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights. �
Action Steas:
'�, �� C/� A rr�� �iromor�tc�—iw,�+h
�
�
h'+vc�cv-:
4. MASAC reports recommendation to MAC
Planning and Environment Committee
5. MAC Planning and Environment reports
recommendation to MAC.
6. MAC recommends to FAA procedure
���„� -�.��������,�,,,•;,,,�,,,�,�,,,,,,,,��-;
�e-��es-�c-� t��;e�,r,�tpie,�;ented;
7. FAA ��{��-n�eeed, ,.� �.,, +„�+„a
��
► ��a���i��i
�
ceanci'i ,
Staff/ARC
Staff/ARC
Staff/ARC
Staff/ARC
When
8. FAA begins . NADPs; Staff/ARC '
„ 4;
;
9. �it-�q��e e���e-�e�+ .,,�,-�T�^,�,�,-;RT� � �9� �
i
2
3educe
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise
Generation Over Mendota Heights
Action Steps•
�, Q., ....,.,:,.� , nn n � .e���.,r+.,+c.,
.
-- '- = - - ' -"
. �_r_
-- „. _
. .
. . ..
� o,,,.� ���+ +�,:� � , �„ +,. t,� ..i�..o.a ,.
6. Call NOISE and inquire about U.S.
Airport nighttime restrictions.
7.
Pursue cessation of head-to-head
operations.
i.,,,,.:i,:iiaiir.r�ii..iii,/',,'•,ii.i.iiriiiiir�.•ii......iiiiii�iii.ii. ..:iiiii
t�SE� �!f E�rg�t►.o��;�aenpce�iensti�c� �tac�
„,,,,,,;i%,,,,,,,.. ,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,--;,,,,.;;,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,.,,...,,,,,��,,,,,, - ,,,.��„�,,- ,,,,,,,,,
d`esrg���'�c�5tiag ;�ELaEt% , cor:�r
{%���//.. ///r�irUii��i��//�r��i/�i, U///2i.'.�ii�/i/s..//�/...i.z9U/.
%�Q�....(r �v���////, �/.////j�// ////�: ... ...��...., ;.,,.�/�///�//////.
i�::,''/.,�ii%i.' iii:%i,Ci�G��E��'�OF1/� .�71�.
i���� �i r. ;,.;....,, J,,..;Cu�/�� '/���i��r��U����i��i����i �::ii/i�� ..,,,,�„�i�r.ru���/���
�ssE�'=l�/�l�CIJ���piec�ent�n��'oCun aE�
i�i//.�nD� //ii/n�� //��i��///�i /����/�L, z9irii/�iii�ni�nn.iz,. �ii�%i rui.ii.ui����i.L
%///////.i%//////��/////�%��/ j/���.iji%//� � �. "� v�////////�
Ag,��e„�re;n,�s;,�ft;l�;�rcE�,rres;
3
Who When
���5 ��e�ed
���i�� ���
�a#� �6i�F�e�e�
�G� ��ed
6et�i�
u
��
Staff
_- - ••_
September 1996
Staff/ARC Fa111996
l�lt`�/�5�1 � ,� 9 ��
;,,,,,,,, „ -,,,, ,,,,,i
ii�,...
;StafffA,�C ;G9��
e
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures �
f
Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor which Mi i imizes
Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure
Action Steas
1. Investigate potential of Global Positioning
Satellite technology
2. Presentation to Commission on GPS by
MAC or other expert
3. Advocate for Maintenance of 5 mile final
arrivals and 3 mile corridor for departures
4. Pursue the benefit of updating Tower
orders to original intent before shift
in magnetic headings
�
Who
Staff/ARC
Staff
Staff/ARC
Staff/ARC
When
Issue:
Goal:
r
, ,
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns
Produce and Distribute Informative Refrigerator Magnets
Advertising the MAC Air Noise Complaint Line
Action Steps•
�
�- .
�-:
4-
��
� r,..,.,..,;....c,.., +,. . . �c...,i i�++,,.
.,a ,.i„
� I�A�nr��+e. rlir.+►ih� �+.�i-1 +.� rr�e�irler�te�
�
i�i+v {Jnll ..�.�r� r..�� ��e.+
8. Continue to inform the community on
ARC projects and concerns using the
City's newsletter and separate single
page mailings.
5
Who
�##
When
��e�ed
�6 �pEe�e�
Staff/ARC Continuous
�
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns
I
Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information i
Actions Steas:
1. Expand mailing list for ARC agenda
to include State Senators and Reps.
2. Mail letters to State Senators and Reps.
Introducing ARC
3. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings
(i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State
elected officials)
4. Expand coverage of air noise issues.
5. Devote entire page of air noise issues
in the City's newsletter
6. Continue to send press releases to
newspapers, State Senators and
Reps.
7. �i'p;cta;��a;�id Promote air noise
mitigation document.
Who When '
Staff Continuous
�
.I
Staff Continuous
Staff Continuous
(Quarterly)
;
Staff Continuous
I I
Staff Quarterly
�
I
;
Staff Continuous
ii .
Staff/ARC Sept. '
/�%//////�//// ' ��/�%////////�/��//�✓�//////���.. .:�' :/%/����'%/%//�/ l`...,...:"��////:✓%/ •/////...
;,�; ,�?;r��s�re�i;�fac;�atcqc�a�;tll�ee,t�n' ;wit�;Ec�it�o��ai ,,5�;�;�'fIA�E ;;��,��
��ir iii���r� iiiiii� i.i :; 'sii •uv%,. •iii�ii. ,;..
,Sia,�;,s,;,a�„t�ll;a�o,�;Papecs CEt�C;;CourrcEt
0
..�
AIR N�ISE PLAN OF ACTION
Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns
Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission
Action Steps•
�
.
„ . „.
- ' - - = - = '
„.
4.
�
�
r�
Who When
�a�## ��e�ed
�#� ��e�e�
�� ���
�a#€ ��et-e�
Discuss concerns with State Senators ARC/
and Reps. regarding composition of Council
MAC. Pursue legislation to amend
,.,,.��,��..f.,,.,,,,,,,��,�,,,,� �,�
MAC Commissioner ��es a�p�,°�,�;,�e��,,,,,,;
Compare cities affected by air noise ARC
to MAC representatives
Dec. 97/Jan.98
...
Review MASAC representation and ARC/Staff 1997/1998
MAC representation with Northern
Dakota County Airport Relations
.ii�.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiir.•,i.i.iiir.�r,",..i�.,,,„i.i..r. /,..iror �
Commission. �E�Fopos�;-ne�stc�ctr�ce;;and
, �� ..�, . .�.�,,,; .,.,,.,,,.,,�,,,,,,,,,..,,i,,,,,,, ,,,,,: ,,,,.,,,.,,,���,,.�,.,,,;
..iiiiiiiiiiiiii.aiii�,,, ,�- i.iii�ir�r.i,.. .. ,.,,..,.
E2E3�BS�E�%tFOE��6Y;I�Li�i4�A `; �
;
C
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan
Prevent Construction of Third North Parallei Runway
Action Steas:
.
Who When ;
�' � //////.%%�//�///.. �. i. �...� �//�////////"r%//�///!%/�///�////✓ ':�!�(•.,,.///�//////////�//�: ////......... �........
;� ;t�;a�F�a�i,,,���;,i�g;mpt�a�c��nrtth; C'o;c�tca,e;� ��!a��a,E��
,�,,.�,��,��,,.,�,��-;,., ., /�,�,.�.,�,,::��:...::-����.,��,,.�,. -,,,,,,,�,,,�,� �,,.,, ,,,,,...
-� E�eseatic -��1�'a'%��. c4�Esit�oc�o�.Buc�a. a� S a� :�9��
i u/. //iiii/iiii/uidiii/i%U//i //ii/oi ////iii /ii, ruii / n..u.. ii�/r U/�:,.. ./r iii nn%ii//i� i i i o// bi iiiii.or/.
�/////////�/////�////////////�%/// ///////"/,, .....� . �G%///!%///'..:...i�%/%/,%��"../
�ltil[ic�es�aEope��ac�c�,,l�l�a�r�tesest ��a��
iii iuiii oi /r. iiviii. iiiiiiiu.. /ii u i i./n.i,,%u.;: iiiiiirno.iir.. �, ui/iiiidi �aii/
%/:U/U/i/.%/�� ��////O///////////�:%/////// %%' %%' ;"i////U,'/.•%///�i� • u/i//,%///,U.
a�e�,a;,�A,rgp,e,�ttes;t;rr;3cd, run,,v,�ay:,area
, ,,,,.:--,-„�,,,,..,....., ,,,,,,�,,,,,,,-,���:�,,, . .,, ,,,,.,,,,. ,,,...
;�; „NfonE;t'o,r;Ei,S;;f�E,o�ess;for:;�F,�;,E�un;w;ay. S�af;f/AaC. �C99Z
•r^/ �i,ii:r i�iiiiii...,. //,✓iiiiii� .�-. .,.,,.., riiir , . „�iiiriiiia,
�: I�Can�tn�--EiS%taci'E���000 fo�ot: Run.wa�
;,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,i,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,%,,,,,�;,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. .,,,,,,..,
Ez3
,, .............. .....
S`ta�f/ARC ;t:99�
, , ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,. .:,,
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan
Implement Noise Mitigation �eeds Req�iice;�ineri�s in MSP Mitigation
. ;;;,;,,,�,,,---,,,,,�,�-�.,,,,,, ,,,,
Committee's Q^ ^�'�+�� 'Campr•eE�e�s���'E�an
i./ii..� /..i iiiriiiiiiir....irin/i/i//ii....,,
Action Steas Who When
� y4�G �a��e�j�
�- � ���i�� c�,.,.,....,�. � aoa
�
�
�, r,,.,�c,�,,. i,.��.,:..,, .,..,� c+�+� t,,,. �i.,+c.,�
�ttCf-tS
'/' � ii//////'�/i//i////////// %'., „ i,.•(/�//�,i.•,,,•,.,• �•i,,./ :a/�///ir ✓//////// ,.•,�////; i�//ii�•..•.•,.•,,• •,,
�� %p['ec�.ectt;t�'�'�s�t�t�SE�l1'lt�tcgatto ,e a� -S��%��. �
%�% 7/i/2 i/iiiiU/////i/ia/i/////i////ii /iid/UU///i/i/�%Ui/ii�/iU.... i/niiii/r. /id//iiii ii. 7iiaiiiiiiia/d/ii/%i//iU.
��j� . / .. �� � ////'U/////�./ ../////// "%1/////"%///////"/////U//%////�%/.%�%//////
� ��'� ��'c�rv E�a , ��oGC�tpE'e�e�ta�rv�
iiii iiiii%iiiiii%iiii /iliiiii �iiii/�ii/iiriiiii�iiiiiii�iiiii;� iiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiii.ri ii. ii/iii
' // % %//./i/iii ..,•,:,,////�/%/// ////a%„i//„ ,•,..• ,
' i� ;%r��E-�o�'��������'l�rE��
'rii/ iiiiiiiiiiii/iiiii//ii/i/iiiii /iii% iiii{ /ii/iii i//iiii//iiiiiiri i
/iii ii•iiiiiiiiii/ ",/iii/iiiii� iii /iiai�iir�iiiiiiiii/i
� �i'a�a�a��o���,�kssE�ac�c�
,,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, �„�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
/� /iii�✓ir.-/v�aiiiiii aii�iir��iiiaiiiiii,
:,,;; .;C'!egcs,���E;�,,e�,,r,��,,;�;',sf��„��;,�,�
F�7
r
Issue:
Goal:
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft
Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000
Action Steps:
�
�,,..,,.,.,.�, fi.,,,+ .,.. .,+ . .,.c„� �
��.
. , .
, ��.
—— „.
. � . .
•�• _
.�., Dra...,.., .....�,.d�.. ., .,1.,....�,�. .,.,.d
ir��f�rm.�+i.�..� I�++r��n r�l..ir�ir�� ie�e�� �
...� .,..I.i.,.. f... 1.,++.,... .,...J /..► .+.,II�. +..
�@'
6. Work with MAC to assure 1996
legislation to convert to all Stage III
aircraft by Year 2000 is implemented
7. Consider Backsliding of Stage III
Conversion
8. �e�ae��-MASAC Consideration of
/ iii.iiii; .. ,r�r..ii.;�,. � c., , .r.
�aEl�g ;St;ag;e,:;IC�;ca,�npf�anc;e
10
Who When'
l
�� ��
f
�
I
�� ��
���
�
Staff
r_vz�
ARC/Council
Upon response of
NWA
I II
:�e,.,..,.
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation
Goal: Determine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air
Noise Distribution
Action Steps: Who When
1. Review history of legal challenges Staff/ARC Completed
related to air noise
2. Investigate FAA procedures in
effect at time of 1973 corridor
decision - Freedom of Information
Act request?
3.
';
Continue to be kept abreast of other
communities' issues and possible
litigation process
,,..,���.,�.�%.., �������....�.������� ��������� �:,• ,��-�,.��,,,,�����,.:��.�.,.�--�•;,���.��������,,.
�'a��sr.c�ev�'EeecY.'o�����f�arrnatroc�Re4� est
i iiiiii/ii iiiiiiii /i /�i/ii/iiiiiiiiii i///iii ///i/iiiiiiri/ i ii i i iiiii/i//iir i ii.. � ii iiiiiii
'%///// ••,• / ///�/// ,,••,.••,••• •••• ,%// ///,%// '%/////////////.%////////'
�or�iE�S�✓a��/ �����,/o ,��ccease •,
iii/��//iii///ii�iii%///�//ii%i//i//ii//�i////riiii/i/ii//i/i//�r/i.i /ii/ii/�
%"i////////////ii///////////.
ii//.:i/i� j����0��
,,.. /ioiiarri iiaii ' /a/iiai� ii/ii•�/iiiiiioi/a/ -..,�iii�:iriiaiii,:' �
�a�src�e���ga���at�e�g,i�iptto��;r�
iiiiiiiiiiii iiiii/ii i/iiiiii, iiii //iiiiiiirrriiiiiriii.. i//i.i . iriiiiiiiii, i:i /
//////i,// ,,,•/////// '/// ... /////////////��////.%/i//...i/.":'/////////'
;�1;��,�,�,��„�,�,��,�;r�ca ,,;Es;;F};eray„e„�
11
Staff Completed
Staff/ARC Continuous
;�,�;�
t
0
AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�.
Issue: �e Expact;,,Eligibility for Part 150 Sound Insulation
Areas Affected by Air Noise Exposure
Goal: Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation
Action Steas: Who When
� nn.,,,+ ,,,,;+M ...,t,.,,.i „a.,,,�.,��+..,+,.... �� ��
+„ a�.. .,a
� ���� ��
�� I
I
3. Continue to monitor changes in the Ldn Staff/ARC On-goi'mg
contours and monitor the Part 150
Sound Insulation program completion
process.
4. Advocate expansion of Part 150 ARC/Council
program through MSP Mitigation
Committee.
5. Advocate for the use of ANOMS data ARC/Council
for Noise Contour Generation for qualifying
Part 150 area
6. Examine the feasibility of purchase or ARC/Council
acquisition through Part 150 for severly
impacted areas
•,,.�„���,,,�,��,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,, „ ,,.,����� ��.���.�,.--.�•,,.�,,.....:,,:,,,��,�,..,,�,���,,,.,,;,., „�,,.,..,; ., ....,...
� � E�nsur��t�C��lE�iiat��s.ec��oci�iais ; ���a�touE St����kf�C
i%ii .. irniii iii/.ii/ii/iiiiiiiii i iiiii i'///in.... ;ri i%�iiiiiriiiiii /ii�iri/iiiii.� iiiiiiiii///iii�iiiiiiiii.,....✓/, i ii ii iiir..iriiiiniii n
%////i/////////% :/i////////'.%///��....,..i,,.,,.�/,.,,//./rii/.....,,.....�....,..,,,�/.....,.;
��n,e���ra;�;fa%„�C���act�;,�5;,%;�;��;;�„�
* Updated July 3, 1997
,
�Fa
am in
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Juiy 3, 1497
To. Aizport Relations Conunission
,
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Adn�iru
Snbject: Discuss Joint Workshop for Airpt�rt Cammissianers
DISCUSSIC}N
The Northem Dakota County Airpart Relatians Commission (NDCARC)� �as been
discussing a joint meeting for officials from each of the communities to meet and� discuss
common auport noise issues, Our Commission should consider date on the calendar works for
them and what topic(s) should be covered at the Joint Workshap. } �
The tentative plan is to meet on an evening in August. Please see surveys from Inver
Grove Heights, Eagan and Sunfish Lake. Remember, we hope to present our Action Plan to
Council on August 19, 1997. If City Council adopts the plan, then we would be Npregared to
present it to the other cammunities. � j
ACTION REQUIRED ,
Provide staff with direction for an appropriate meeting date far the Joint '
witi� NDCARC communities. i
. •�
06-13-97 01;49PM FROM CITY OF EAGAN TO 945289z0
P001/001
;
;
� .
i
Cit' o�
,1��.
1Vie�dota Hei�hts
June 2, 1997
To: Northern Dakota Counry Airport Relations Coalitian
�
From: KevinBatchelder,GityAdministra �������
Subject: Joint Workshop for Air Noise Commissioners
� ,
DISCUSSION � • �
� .
i
For the last several months, the NDGARC hac discussed � joint :�vorkshcg meeting in
which the Corr�missioners from each cities' Airport Relations Commission wouId have ari
opportunity to meet, network and exchange ideas. In order to get an idea from each
community about what date� would work, I am asking that each of you please fi11 �ut the'
following survey, ff you w�uld please return this survey grior to JunF 17, 1�97, I w�ul� br
able to r�port to iJDEAR� at tbeir regularlv sr,heduled meetin� that daj�. '
� ' . � , . .- • . ., � . . � . •. ... i .
J. Woulci you Iike Tc,� h��l� u:is snezti:�� en �he sarr.� nigh� a= YC��r re�ul?�!y ;ch�u.i�Je�
�ueeting��nisht? Please �ircie an.e_ , .
�
3
Yes 1Vo
Whe�yQur regularly scheduled meeting?
rJd
Wouid th month o ugus e a convenient date to attend this meeting?
OR�.
�C'�s No
4. Assummg an evening meetir�g, what day of the week would be preferred?
all appropriate evenings.
5.
�
� .
Please cir�:le
I
, ..
i
�
N�eBSe°CllCle
� :
Monciay Tuesday Wednesday Th2�rsday � �
�
What dac�s in August, or the last week in September, do not work for S��ur certun�.nity?
. � ��- .�� 1���� � ���:19�:� � � z�* . . � ,
.���..�; ,, t�: , . , . . . . . . .._ _ ... � . ',:;. .., !
Wh�t topics would you like to have for this joint workshop? ���� � i
��� ��,:. �t _ _. .. � ��: �
. ;.;
� �� � ,i
1101 Vietoria Curve •ltiiendota Hei¢hts. 1ViI� • 55118 452•18�0
�
�S
C ity o�
1Viendota Heights
�
June 2, 1997
To: Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition
-�
From: Kevin Batchelder, City Adminis t�or`�
Subject: Joint Workshop for Air Noise ComA-nissioners
DISCUSSIi)�
For the last several months. the NDC.AP�C ha� discussed a joint workshop meeting in
which the Commissioners from each iities' Airpert l�elations Commission would' have an
opportunity to meet, network znd exchange ideas. In order to get an idea from each
community about what cla�es would work, I am asking �at each of yoL please fill �ut the
fallowing survey. If y�u would please ret�r� this survey prior to �une ??, 1997;� i w��ald be
a�lr to report to NDCARC at their regul�►rri;� sche�ul�d meeting that day. i '
�
i
1. �Vould you like to neld this me�.:r�'� : thc :ar.;:: �ight as your rPgularly s'c.l-,edu�ed
meeting rright? Plcase circle or��. '
- I
Yes No � �
I
2. When is yoiir regularly schedule� �,�c:�:���" ��� w ecl� e.►� 't ; 3 d� �°''
��
3. Would the month of Aug�ist be a cc�n•r�nieLt cate to attend this meeting'? �Please circle
one. � �
�i
5
�
av-c� cQ C�eclL �4�..5 I�
iZS _ ��.;
Assuming an evening meeting, what day of the week would be pr
all appropriate evenings.
Monday Tuesday ednesda Thursday
Please circle
What dates in August, or the last week ii� September, do not work for your community?
..• - p �.� 13 , • • ' 1/a�� ,,� { I s'y3 �3 �G . �. �s �a �. � ;
What topics would you like to fiave for this joint workshop?
_ �
1�, � 6' i!(, (L - pa�e,r Q,p� C� eoQ
-. Q t � ed o' � G t
�aMci�.. �t,Scl P(aa�non�
I
R.ur� �:�.. Sy s-��
�
LCs�e. n �;rv�r'D't'� P�+-�'�'"`-
1101 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 ;452 • 1850
� fR r �-� c,• � � �;�i � � T ��.,-�.+ ,
U s-t a f ���.h��o.�,tic'. �a �fs .
City o�
��,,., ,1�iendota Height�
June 2, 199 i
To: Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition
From: Kevin Batc:helder, City Administr t�ir �;
Subject: Join� Workshop for Air Nois� Conuuis;:iune�s
DISC,SJSSION
�����
��` :��.
� i
For the iast several months, d►e Nl)CARC has discussed a joint workshop meetin� in
which the Commissioners f.rom eacli ��ties' Airport Relations Commission would have an
opportunity to meet, network and exchange ideas . Xn order to get an idea from each
coriunui�ity abou! what dates wo�ild work; I am; �skin� chat each of you pleas� fill ��ut the
toliowing suFve�. If you would please rerirn ihis,survey prior to June 1?. 1497, I r��uid be
able to report to NDCARC a►. �hair regi�Iariy scjieduied mceting t,h:iE day.
I. Would vou like to hold this meerin� �n Fhe zamt niglu as ya►�
2.
3.
meeting night? Pleasc circJe onc.
Yes
/
No
When is your reguiarly schedule,�i rre�cing'�
� reguIarl. sc:�e�ule �
�''a .�'
.,✓ � ,
��},,�'� �J
�t�'
�
Would the month of August be a c��nverie��c date t�� atterr� this meeting:' Please circle
one. �
Yes
No
4. Assuming an evening mee[ing, what day af the �uez.k would be prefeired'? Please circle
all appropriate evenings.
Monda Tues Wednesda Tliursda ����'`'� � ���
Y �Y Y ,e..� 7=30
5. ' What dates in Atigust or the last week in Sept�mber, do not work fur your commun:ty''
�x-�-l�.� a�e ��� �� ClJ.c���• ,c�
�-�r,�, �/�
6. What topics w�iuld you like to have fbr this j�int workshop7
I '�
1101 �Jictoria Gurve -1Viendota Heights, 1KN • 55118 452�1850
Z0 �9Vd ��lu-SS3 E66866ZZT9 Ob�ZZ L66T/CT/90
;r
,�
�'
1Viendota
June 2, 1997
Ta: Northem Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition
�,,��
From: Kevin Bat�helder, City Administr �"r
Subject: Joint Wurkshop for Air Noise Cumm.issior�ers
DISCUSSION
�
C ity O�
Hei�hts
. ► :. :
� �� l� ��� -�- .
�;`����}f O� ,�g_
�� ... �.�,__ �
I -- �:,,q 4 - � �<...,... �s �
I ���w.4,� �� : 1 '�'«.=.� Y I
`�.•. „" i`•':
�) � 4 µ,w�'��
i ' T
I' � ��
�
For the last several months, the N�CARC has ciiscussed a joint workshop meeting in �
which the Commissioners from each cities` Airpor .Relations Commission would� have an
opporninity to meet, network and exchange ideas. In order to get an idea from each
community about what dates would wc�rk, 1 a�- asking tihat each c�f you please �iil out thE
following survey. If you wou�d please retum thi� surve.y p�iu� t� June 17, 1997,� I would he
able to report to NDCAI�C at thexr r�gula��� �cheu�.�lyd meetin� that day. I
<. . ... .- •- � .: � • ;: .. _ ... : - �- - �'. : : • .: �._ . .�_..... .- _. I
i. `vi�'c.�uld you like .i.p ��id i.his �eet�n� en ��:e sume :..i�ilt as your regulari}r s�h�rluied ��
meeting night? Flease circie one. �� �� , �
� — �(� ��� �i_�J,'' ;; o,J
Yes ��j�i ��*+ �le k. , � �.
�� �t/�9;,.�-d ` p u-� �.-ts,. �� 1' 1'�
7 ..� [ I
2. When is your regularly scheduled meeting� �� G,k� o��dN1�
I
I
3. Would the month of August be a con��enient dai� ta atterid this meeting? Please circle
one. � �
Ye
No
4. Assuming an evening meeting, what day of *he ;��eek �Nould be
all appropriate evenings.
Monday Tuesd � t Wednesda Thursday
5. What dates in August, or the last week i�t Sep+ember, d� not work for ;
. ,�:�.� �� _ �� ,. - :� . -
5. What topics would you ]ike to have i�r �h:s jc;��� ;�or.ishup7 �.
Please circle
community?
�i �a r.¢� r rr�..0 1 —C� /�J �: ��.b�( c�v.- T.r f-� , t w d � i
(�I /— ` � � ' yLJ1 /1 "� �i �c� C � �� � i✓ f ��'�,'"r ��`T-i'�i �/,/d �� �.��r. ��'�
,' / i(� �%`� /7�'c.i� t'y C a�+� I o�� ?
�y��,�fi�� , Jr�� � d.� �..� s�
!
1101 Vietoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 ;452 • 1850
;�.
r� r
,f
�
,�
� .�.��.
July 2, 1997
1Viendota
Mr. John Himle, Chair
Planning and Environment Committee - MAC
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799
Dear Mr. Himle:
i�
City o�
Hei��l�ts
This letter is to appeal the action taken by the Metropolitan Airport Sound Abate;
(MASAC) regarding the Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) procedures.�
1997, MASAC, on a vote of 13-7 recommended that MAC establish a"Close-9
profile for runways 29 L/R only. The action taken by MASAC was contrary to the
resolution, a copy of which had been forwarded to Mr. Robert Johnson, the MASE
in sufFcient time to be forwarded to all members with their meeting agenda. f
�.... - I
nent Council
On May 27,
n" departure
city's formal
.0 chairman,
In addressing noise impacts in communities surrounding MSP, the Metropolitan Airports
Commission has established a practice of giving prime consideration to those areas �most heavily
impacted by aircraft noise, in particular, those properties with the LDN 65. The MAC analysis
on NADP's demonstrates that noise would be reduced for over 470 residential and school
properties inside the LDN 65 in Mendota Heights with a change in procedures to tlie "Close-In"
option.�� �
. ;
Since the City of Mendota Heights receives a majority of all departures emanating from MSP
it only makes sense to implement the same procedure for 11 L/R that is being im lemented to
provide noise relief in south Minneapolis off of 29 L/R. ��
The City Council at its regular' meeti.ng last evening directed me to promptly '�
respect to the city's position as it relates to the NADP procedures. Accordingly, I �
that the MAC Planning and Environment Committee recommend that the "Close-�
procedure be implemented for runways 11 L/R. i
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Qt� � ����--�-
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
Enclosure
tify you in
►uld request
" departure
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1�iN • 55118 452 • 1850
CITY OF NIENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, NIINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 97- 22
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING A CHANGE IN T'HE DEPARTU�RE PROCEDURES
FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS-EAGAN CORRIDOR
WHEREA.S, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is considering the
establishment of Noise Abatement Departure Profile procedures to provide noise mitigation to
communities surrounding Minneapolis-St. Paul International Auport; and
WHF'�2EAS, the MAC has an established practice of giving prime consideration to
those areas most heavily impacted by air noise; and
WHF.REAS, the Mendota Heights-Eagan corridor receives a majoriry of all departures
from the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport; and
VPST.REAS, the MAC analysis demonstrates that 470 residential or school properties
within Mendota Heights would experience a reduction in noise levels within the DNL 65 noise
contour if the current Distant departure procedure was switched to a Close-In departure
procedure.
NOW, TAFRF.FQRE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, that Mendota Heights formally requests that the Metropolitan Airports
Commission immediately implement the Close-In departure procedure for the Mendota
Heights-Eagan corridor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20th day of May, 1997.
CTTY COUNCII.
CITY OF NIENDOTA I-�IGHTS
gy ��,,.� � GG/�-►�-.zz'
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTFST:
�
� � _ �7'�/.1i�� . %�? �,_ -.t-� -��
k�athleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
city oF eac��n
June 20, 1997
MANUEL TORRES
ACTING MANAGER OPERATIONS BRANCH
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMII�IISTR.ATION
GREAT LAKES REGION
2300 EAST DEVON AVENUE
DES PLAINES, IL 60018
Dear Mr. Torres:
,;�;� ? � 1997
THOMAS EGAN
Mayor
PATRICIA AWADA
BEA BLOM9UIST
SANDRA A. MASIN
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Adminisirator
E. J. VAN OVERBEKE
City Cterk
T'r,�.'� ��u f�r ��:� ���t�: �f June � respc:�diag to the cng:,u-�g c:,r�ce�r�s �f t�'�e City
concerning your agency's decision regarding revised air traffic control procedure's in the
Eagan-Mendota Heights comdor. I appreciate the points that you make and the effoi
that you went to to respond to our concems. Nonetheless, several issues remain.' I ThE
most significant is the suggestion that it is an obligation of the City to perform DNL
analysis to substantiate the effectiveness of less dramatic alternatives. I am unaware
any environmental review process where an obligation is placed on commenting agei
or individuals to perform the analysis that is the responsibility of the reviewing agenc
In addition, if it was our obligation, the reviewing agency would likewise have tlie
obligation of informing us of that fact so that we could undertake the work necessary
meet your needs. I I
of
to
I also appreciate your sensitivity in suggesting that misunderstandings or inaccurate
assumptions are the basis for certain comments, but it would likewise appear that if your
agency's analysis identified such misunderstandings that further discussions with� the
affected communities prior to a decision would have been warranted. j
I am sure you appreciate that the City actively pursues its issues with the MAC
MASAC. I also appreciate your assurance that the FAA is interested in cooper
the develonment of ineans to mitigate noise effects for the City of Eagan. I wo
that future efforts in this regard would involve closer interaction with the affect
such that all parties can fully appreciate the perspectives of the others and that 1
considerable work which your agency puts into such reviews can be used to be�
lazgest number of people possible.
S' ely,
�
Thomas L. He ges
City Administrator
cc: Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights
John Foggia, Metropolitan Airports Commission
MUNICIPAL CENTER
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897
PHONE. (612) 681-4600
FAX.(612)681-4612
TDD• (612) 454-8535
THE LONE OAK TREE
THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNIN
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
ig in
hope
cities
the
MAINTENANCE FACILITY
3501 COACHMAN POINT
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122
PHONE. (612) 681-4300
FAX. (612) 681-4360
TDD:(612)454-8535
• Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airport
- =•=•-�� �
MONTHLY MEETING - Metr�rolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
c�,�„�.
Rnbert P. Johrcon
w« c�.,�,,,:
Thanas HueR
TitMiucal Ad�isnr
IYxI Eriekvon
Arnng Srrnran•.
Ndt$a ScarroncW
Airbnrnr Erpirss:
Brlan Batcc
Air Ticnspnn Assncianm:
�i ���
ALPA.
Chrries W. Curry Jr.
Ciq• of BlnommRmn:
Pemwa Lee
vem w�mx
r�� o�e�mr;u�:
Fd Porter
Cirv ojFi;¢m�:
Tom Egan
Cin• ajlm�rr Gim�r Htiglus:
D�le Hamrtom
Cin• of Madara Hei,qNs:
JW Smlth
Cin• ajMinncapdis:
�.� s. s�M,
bhn Rkhler
��
Jodlth Dodge
c��� otR��nh�w:
Krbul Sbk�s
n.,.o w.�cei
c��• �fs�. ra;� �„�:
iinbert Adrcws
cr�� o�s�. ��:
G Scon Bunlu
'i'homas H. Hues
Carol A�o NeGulrs
Drlm Air [Gntt fnc.
Rkh KldweU
Fedtrd Erpnrx:
Dao DeBord
Fedtrd A�mnan Mnwuswnan:
6rnce wa�oner
(toarid Glaub
MACSmg:•
Dkk Ksiu
MBM.
RoDert P. bhmon
Mesalw Northwsr� Ai�Vink:
DanklS6ahao
Mtrmpdiran Airynns Commis:im:
Cammi$looer Alma G�per
MN Air N(uin�nl Guarti:
Nqjor Ruy J. SheUcn
Nnnh��trr A�diner.
Nark Salmeu
Jennlfer Sayre
Sl. Ptml Chtmhrr �i/Cummerrr.
Cra1R Wruck
Sun GwNn•A�rllnrr
Dak Karlra
Unurd AvLnra lnr.
su v�u$
c•��«d ��� s�,,,<•�:
110ce Geyer
U.S .lir Fnrtz Resen•r:
CapWn Dav{d J. Gerkeo
Metropolitan Airports Commission '
Declaration of Purposes ;
1 J Promote public weifare and national security; serve public, �interest, convenience,
and necessity; promote air navigation and transportation, intemauonal, national, state,
and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, �safe, and economical
handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in nationa! and intemational
programs of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the
metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center, and to correlate that area with all
aviation facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the' most economical and
effective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area; � I
II
2.) Assure the residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact
from air navigation and transportation, and to that end provide for noise abatement,
control of airport area land use, and other protecdve measures; arid
3.) Promote the overall goals of the state's environmental F
public's exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement
Statement of Purpose
This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general wel
adjoining Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport - Wolc
public airport in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, ti
the problems created by the sound of aircraft using the airF
evaluation on a continuing basis of the problem and of suggesti
the same; through initiation. coordination and promotion of r
procedures, control and regulations, consistent with the safe ope
of aircraft using the same; and through dissemination of infc
communities, their affected residents, and the users of the
problem of aircraft noise nuisance and in respect to suggesi
initiated and taken to alleviate the problem.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Ca
Representation �
ies and minimize the
: of the communiues
hamberlain Field, a
igh the alleviation of
; through study and
for the alleviation of
�nable and effecdve
on of the airport and
ation to the affected
�port respecting the
s made and actions
The membership shall include representatives appointed by agencies, corporations,
associations and governmental bodies which by reason of their statutory authority and
responsibility or control over the airport, or by reason of their� status as airport users,
have a direct interest in the operation of the airport. Such members will be called User
Representatives and Public Representatives, provided that the User Representatives and
Pubtic Representatives shall at all times be equal in number. i�
The Airport 24-hourNoise Hotline is 726-94/1.
Complainrs to the hotline dv not result in changes
rn Airport activitr, but provide a public sounding
board and airport information outlet. The hotline
�s staffed during business haurs, Monda}• - Frida�:
Metropolitan Airports Commission Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
This report is preE
Chad Leqve, ANS
Questions or comi
MAC - Aviation
Minneapolis / St.
6040 28th Avenu
Minneapolis, MA
'TeL• (612)•725-6:
A,�SP Home Pat
�red and printed in house by
' Specialist
�ents may be directed to:
loise & Satellite Program
�aul International Airport
South
55450
I I. Fax: (612) 725-6310
:: http://www.macavsat.or2
m
�
Operations and Complaint Summary 1
Operations Summary All Aircraft .................................................:.. !! ..,.........................1
MSP May Fieet Mix Percentage .......................................................... ��......,.,..................... t
Airport May Carnplaint Summary ...................................................... !� ............................1
May Operatians Summary - Airgort Liirectors Office ................. ' ....1
....... � � ........................
. . . . ..I I..
Minneapolts - S�. Paul Internaizonal Airport �"orriplaznt�Summary 2
Com laint Summary by City .... . ...... ................ ...... ....... .. ... .'! .. . ... . .. ..2
P
. .. ... .. .... .. . .. . .. ... . ..... ....... .
Availahle Time for Runway Ilse .3 i
Tower Log Reparts - All Hours .......................................................... :............................3
Tower Log Reports - Nighttime Hours ............................................... �i ............................3
AllOperations 4
,
RunwayUse Report May 1997 ............................................................4.. ...............4
Carrier Jet O erations 5 !
� I
RunwayUse Report May 1997 .......................................................... '............,...........,.....5
Nighttime = All C)peratians G
Runway Use Report May 1997 ........................................................
Nightlime Carrier Jet Operations 7
Runway Use Repart May i997 ..........................................................
Carrier Jet Operai�i'ons by Type 8
Aircra, fi Ider�ta zer and Description Table 9
..............................6
............................7 �
Runway Use - DaylNight Periods - Alt ()perations 1 D
. �
' ...... i 0
Daytime Hours .....................................................................................�........,...............
I
Community f)verflight Analysis ll '
Carrier Jet Operations All Hours ..................................................... '........................... I I
.....
Carrier Jet U erations - Ni httime 11 m- 6 am � ......11
P g i P } ...............................',.......................
Aviation ?�oise & Satellite Pro�rams
Remote Monitoring Site Locations 12
Carrier ,Jet Arri val Related Noise Everzts 13
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each l2MT .....................................................13
Carrier Jet Lleparture Related Noise Evenis 14
Count of Degarture Aircraft Naise Events far Each RMT ................................................14
Ten Loudest Aireraft Noise Events Identi, f'ied
�'`en Laudest Aircruft lYoise Eve�ts Idenl�` ied
fien Lvudest Aircraft Noise �vents Ir�entified
fien Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Ident%fi`ed
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
Ten Loudest Aircra, ft Noise Events Identified
Flight Track Base Map 2.1
15
1�
1�
18
19
20
Airport 1Yaise and C�pera�'ons .��ot�i�oring Syst�em Fl%ght Traeks 22
Carrier Jet {�perations - May i997 ....................................................................................22
Airport Noise and f.�perati'ons tl�oniioring System FZi,ght �'racks 23
CazrierJet Operations - May 1997 ....................................................................................23
Airport Noise and fl�erah'ons Mvnitoring System Fli,gh� �'raeks 24
Carrier .Tet Operations - May 1997 ................................................................................... 24
Analysis of Airera, f� 1�oise Events - Aireraft Ldn d8{A}
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB�A}
Ariation Noise & Satellite Pro�rams
zs
m
. i
Metropol i�
- Operations and Complaint Summary
May 1997
Operadons Summary - All Aircraft (
Runway Arrival % Use Departure
04 85 0.7% 83
22 118 1.0% 613
11 3019 25.9% 3231
29 8431 72.4% 7435
MSP MayFleet Mix Percentage
Stage
Stage 2
Stage 3
% Use '',
�
0.7%
5.4%
28.5% I
65.4°k �
Scheduled Scheduled ANOMS ANOMS i
•� 1996 _. .: ,--1997 �--:. Count 1996 Count 199'
- ,
52.4% 42.0% 50.6% 44.8% j
47.6% 58.0% 49.4% 55.2% �
Airport May Complaint Summary
� - .Airport :�= " : --` 1996 • 1997
MSP 1039 995
Airlake 0 0
Anoka 5 2
Crystal _ 0 1
Flying Cloud 5 2
Lake Elmo 0 1
St Paul 0 1
Misc. 1 1
TOTAL 1050 1003
May Average Daily Operations Summary - FAA Airport 'h�affic
Aviation Noise & Sateliite Programs
Airports Commission
Paae I
Mesropoiitan Airports Cammission
1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International Airgort Camplaint Summary
May 1997
Campiaint Summary by City
City Arrival Departure Tatal Percentage
Apple Valley Q 4 4 0.4%a
Bloornington I 12 13 1.3�1a
Burnsville 1 14 15 1.5%a
Eagan 16 29 45 4.6%
Eden Prairie 3 10 13 1.3%
Edina 1 11 12 L2%
Hastings 0 1 1 0.1%
Inver Grove Heights 7 277 284 28.8%
Mendota Heights 3 43 46 4.7%
Minneagalis � 111 310 421 42.7%
minnetonka 1 0 1 0.1 %
Plymouth 0 2 2 0.2%
Richfieid 5 28 33 3.4°l0
Roseville 0 1 1 0.1%
South St.Paul Q 1 1 0.1%
St.Louis Park 2I 16 37 3.8°l0
St.Paul 19 24 39 4.0%
Sunfish Lake Q 17 17 1.7%
Tatal 1$9 796 9$5 i00%
Time o� Day Nature af Campiaint
'ISme Total Nature of Compiaint Total
00.00 - OS:59 26 Excessive Noise 94(}
06:00 - Qb:59 13 EarlylLate 37
07:00 - 11:59 141 Low Flying 4
12;00 - 15:59 127 Swcturai Disturbance 2
lb.(}� - 19:59 242 Heiicapter l
20:OQ - 21:59 252 Ground Noise 9
22:00 - 22:59 166 Engine Run-up 1
23:00 - 23:59 28 Frequency t
Tatal 995 Total 995
Page 3 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
� Available Time for Runway Use �
Tower Log Reports - May 1997 '
All Hours
i
0% �
I
I
�
37% 1% j
33% � ;
w w I
v:
1%
8%
9%
17
Nighttime Hours
0%
0%
�l r�. ,L `l2
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
82%
an Airports Commission
Page 3
�Ietrapolitan :�irports Cort�mission
All Operations
Runway Use Report May 1
Runway A��'� Caunt Percentage May 1996 May 199G
Departure Count Percentage
04 A� $5 0.7°1"a 185 l.�%
1 I L A 1472 12.6% 302 I 25.1 %
11R A 1547 13.3% 2626 21.8%
22 A . 118 1.0% 29 0.3%
29L A �512 38.�% 3278 27.�%
29R A ' 3919 33.?% 290Q 24.1 %
Total Arr. 11653 100%a 12Q39 100%a
04 D $3 0.7%a 16 0.1 %a
l l L D 1485 13.1 % 3090 25.7%
11R D 1746 15.4% 2942 24.5%
22 D 613 5.4% 245 2.0%
29L D 38$b 34.2% 2981 24.7%
29R D 3549 3I.2%a 2773 23.0%
Total Dep. 11362 ].00% 12047 100%
Note: ARTS riata missing for 12.5 days
Page 4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
� � Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report May 19 7
0.2%
�
65.2 % 0.4%
26.6 0
v-*
0.4%
\
5.8%
Runway ArrivaU
Departure
04 A
11L A
11R A
22 A
29L A
29R A
Total Arr.
04 D
11L D
11R D
. 22 D
29L ' D
29R D
Total Dep.
Connt Percentage May 1996
Count
32 0.4% 23
984 13.2% 2783
995 13.4% 2995
33 0.4% 0
2866 38.4% 1945
2551 34.2% 1175
7461 100% 8921
10 0.2% 0
945 13.1 °Io 2491
1132 15.7% 2824
421 5.8% 12
2628 36.4% 1862
2079 28.8% 870
7215 100% 8059
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 dm�s
Aviation ivoise & Satellite Programs
in Airports CommissioR
1996
�,
0.�
�
31.2%
33.6%
�
0.0%
21.8%
13.2%
�
100%
, � .., ,,,
30.9%
35.0%
'� �0.2%
�
��23.1%
j10.8%
��
� 100%
Paae �
�ietropalitan Airpcirts Commissian
Nighttime - All CJperations
Runway Use R.eport May 19 7
3.8%
Runway .�p�re Caunt Per�centage ��unt� Fercey ntage
04 A 22 4.7% 26 4.4%
11L A 5 l.l°l0 62 14.5%a
11 R A 29 6.3% 141 24.0%
22 A . 15 3.2%a 5 0.9%
29L A 341 �3.7°l0 30I S I.2%a
29R A 51 1 LO% 53 9.0%
Total Arr. 4�3 100% S88 100%
04 D 9 3. $% 3 I.4%
1 I L D 15 b.4% 34 i 5.7%
11 R D 97 41.3% 101 46.5%
22 D 5� 24.3% 5 2.3%
29L D 55 23.�% 55 25.3%
29R D 2 4.8% 19 8.8%
Total Dep. 235 1.00% 217 100%
I+Iote.• ARTS data missing for 12.5 da)'s
Page 6 Aviation Noise & Satellite Proerams
i
�Setropoli
Nighttime Carrier Jet Qperations �
Runway Use Report May 19 7 E
�
,
0.0% �
,
i
Runway
04
11L
11R
22
29L
29R
��
Total Arr.
���
04
lIL
11R
22
29L
29R
��
Tatal Dep.
ArrivaU
Departure
�.�.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Count Percen e M$ ��
� Y
Caunt
15 49% 9
3 1 A% 40
19 6.2% $9
3 1.0°lo Q
22S �3.5% 216
41 �13.4% 36
30t5 100% 390
0 O,Q°lo 0
8 7.0% 24
43 37.7% 51
44 38.6% 0
17 14.9% 20
2 i.$°lo i0
114 100% 105
Note: ARTS data missing fQr 12.5 days
A��iatian Noise & Satelfite f'rograms
tan Airports Commission
199G
��
..r�
;12.3%a
�
i i 0.3%
; 22.8%
� � 4.0°l0
�
' S5.4%
� � 9.2%
.�..
( �104%
.�.
! � 4.4%
, � 4.6%
� �77.0%
� I 0.0°l0
� � 19,0%
; ( 9.5%
..��
i�100%
Paae 7
Me[ropolitan ?�irports Commission
Page 8
Carrier Jet Operations by 'I`ype
May 1997
Aircraft Type Count Percentage
B707 0 0.0%
B727H 200 1.4%
B733/4/5 462 3.1%
B747 87 0.6%
B74F 28 0.2%
B757 1393 9.5%
B767 4 0.0%
gA46 1 0.0%
CL65 198 1.4%
DA 10 0 0.0%
DC 10 607 4.1 %
DC87 73 0.5%
DC9H 1933 13.2%
EA30 19 0.1%
EA31 19 0.1%
EA32 1655 11.3%
FK10 683 4.7%
L1011 24 0.2%
MD 11 2 0.0%
MD80 711 4.8%
sAio i2 o.i%
BA 11 0 0.0%
B727 1376 9.4%
B737 897 6.1%
DC8 43 0.3%
DC9 4249 28.9%
FK28 0 0.0%
Total 14676 100%
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
A�•iation ivoise & Satellite Programs
55.2 % Stage III
44.8 % Stage II
�
0
Idendfier
B 707
B727
B727H
B733/4/5
B737
B74?
B74F
B757
B767
BA10
BAII
BAMS
CL65
DA 10
DC 1Q
DC8
DC87
DC9
DC9H
EA30
EA31
EA32
FK 10
FK27
FK2$
L1011
MI} 11
MD80
SW3
SW4
SF34
i
Metrogoi i
Aircraft Identifier and DescriptionTable �
f
�
Aircraft Descriptian
BOEING 707
BOEING '727
BC}EING ?27 - HUSH KIT
BOEING 737-300/400/S00
BOEING 737 1001200 SE�RIES
BOEFNG 747
BOEING ?47 FREIGHTER
BOEING 757
BC7EiNG 767
$RITISH AEROSFACE 125
BRTTISH AEROSPACE 111
BRITISH AEROSPACE 146
CANADAIR 650
FALCON 1Q
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 10
MCDUNNELL DOUGbAS DC8
MCD()NNELL D(}UGLAS DC8 70-SERIFS RE
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9
MCDONNELL DQUGLAS DC9 HUSH KTT
AIltBUS INI}USTRIES A300
AIItHUS IIVDUSTRIES A310
AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A320
Ft)KKER 104
Ft�KKER F21(FROP}
FOKKER F28
LOCKHEED TRISTAR L 1011
MCD{31�iNELL DaUGLAS DC I 1
MCDQNNELL DOLJGLAS DC9 80-SERIES
SWEARINGEN MBTROLINER 3
SWEARINGEN METROLiNER 4 -
SRA$ 344
A�•iation Noise & Satellite Programs
�
i
fiiij}OttS COTCiiFiYSSi011
Page 9
�
1�letropolitan Airports Commission
Runway Use - Day/Night Periods - All Operations
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 1997
Daytime Hours
Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals Percentage Total Day
Name Day Use Day Use
04 74 0.7% 63 0.6% 137
11L 1470 13.2% 1467 13.1% 2937
11R 1649 14.8% 1518 13.5% _�-- 3167
22 556 5.0% 103 0.9% 659
29L 3831 34.4% 4171 37.3% 8002
29R 3547 31.9% 3868 34.6% 7415
Total ll127 100% - ll190 100% 22317
Nighttime Hours
Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals Percentage Total Night
Name Night Use Night Use
04 9 3.8% 22 4.7% 31
11L 15 6.4% 5 1.1% 20
11R 97 41.3% 29 6.3% 126
22 57 24.3% 15 3.2% 72
29L 55 23.4% 341 73.7% 396
� 29R 2 0.8% 51 11.0% 53
Total 235 100% 463 100% 698
Nore: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Page 10 Aviation ;voise & Satellite Programs
� Metrapo(il n Airpo�ts Camrnission
. Community Overflight Analysis ��
Minneapoiis - St. Paul Internationai Airport May 1997
�
Carrier Jet Operations - ALI Hours �
(
N b N b Tot,al Percent Number of
Overflight Area A�,�� �p �� Carrier Jet Carrier Jet Operations
Uperations Operations per 24 Hours
�
Over So. Minneapolis/ 1979 4707 6686 45.5% 361.4
No. Richfield �
Over So. Richfield/ 32 421 453 3.1% � 24.5
Bloomington i
' Over S� PauI - 33 14 43 0.3% � 2.3
Highland Park �
Over Eagan/ 5417 2077 7494 51.1 % 405.1
Mendata Heights �
Total . 146'76 100%� I 793.3
�I
Overflight Area
{�ver Sa. Minneapolisl
No. Richfield
Over So. Richfield/
Blaomington
Over St. Paul -
Highland Park
Over Eaganl
Mendota Heights
To#ai
Carrier Je# Uperahans • Nighttime t11pm - 6 am) i
I
Number Number Total Percen
ArrivaLs Departur�s Carrier Jet Carrier ,
Operations Uperatic
�
22 19 41 9.8%;
I
15 44 59 14.0%
3 0 3 0.7%�
� t
I
, �
266 51 3I7 75.5%
' • �
' 420 100%.
,
Nore: ARTS dara missing for l2.5 days � I
I
�
(
Number of
Opera4ons
per 24 Hours
1.5
2.2
0.1
1 I.6
15.�i
A��iation ivbise & Sateltite Programs �I PaQe 1 i
Metropalitan Airports Commission
Remote Monitoring Site Locatians
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System
Page 12 Aviatian Noise & Satellite Pragrarfls
RMT
ID
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
14
11
t2
13
14
15
I6
I7
18
19
20
z�
22
23
24
Metropali I n Airports Commission
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events �
May 1997 i
i
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT
City
Minneapotis
Minneagotis
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Richfield
Minneapolis
St. Paul
SL Paul
St Paul
S� Paul
Mendota Heights
Eagan
Mendota Heights
Eagan
Blaamingtan
Rich6eld
$loomington
Rict�fie3d
Inver Grove Heights
Inver Grove Heights
Mendota Heights
Eagan
Apgm�mate Streei Locatian
Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street
Fremont Avenue & 43rd Streei
W Elrawood Street & Belmont Avenue
Oakland Avenue & 49th Street
I2th Avenue & 58th Street
25th Avenue & Slth Soreet
Wentwath Avenue & 64th S�eet
Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street
Saratoga Stre�t & Hartford Avenue
Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Strcet
Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue
AIton Streat & Rockwooci Avenue
Southeast end of Mohican Court
First Street & McKee Street
Cullen Street & Le�ngton Avenue
Avalan Avenue & vias Lane
84th Street 8c 4th Avenue
75th Street & 17th Avenue
16th Avenue & 84th Sueet
�Sth Streei & 3rd Avenue
Bazt�aza Avenue & 67th Street
Anne Marie Trail
End of Kenndon Avenue
ChapeI i.ane & Wren Lane
Events
>65dB
��
602
738
84Q
86Q
928
9$1
169
I1$
62
147
25
119
i57
3570
3W
2509
21
97
�0
36
7?
1845
982
i993
Note: ART� data missing for 12.5 duys
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Events
�S(i�dB
��
28
i 1'T
287
316
A� 13
425
19
19
29
28
3
16
2
129
26
9$0
6
S
1
2
5
23
13
58
�
Pase 13
Vletrogolitan Airporv Commission
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
May 199"7
Caunt of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT
p;,�T Events Events Events Events
ID City Appmximate Street Location ��dB >SOdB >9adB >100dB
i Minneapoiis Xerxes Avenue & 4ist Sireet 557 F30 2 0
2 Minneapalis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 9b3 3Q1 6 0
3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street 8c Belmont Avenus 1321 177 17 0
4 Minneapolis Qakland Avenue & 49th Street � 1993 544 57 I
5 Minneapotis i2th Avenue & 58th Stre�i 3344 1544 �59 34
6 Minneapoiis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 3794 1915 $37 139
7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Soreet 236$ • 864 9Q 2
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 290 91 10 0
9 S�. Paui Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue iS 9 4 0
10 St Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 157 1'7 9 5
11 St� Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 4$ � i l Q Q
I2 St. Paul Alwn Sareet 8c Rockwood Avenue 1Q2 27 i Q
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Motucan Court 842 205 1 0
14 Eagan F'ust Street & McKee Street 1063 395 38 2
15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 1562 366 14 0
16 Eagan Avalon Avenve & YIas Lane 1217 4'71 � 1 13
i7 Bloamingtan 84th Street & 4th Avenue 486 81 12 1
18 R.ichfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 1239 280 96 8
19 Bloomingtan 16th Avenue & 84th S�eet 446 150 23 0
20 Richfieid 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 537 29 4 0
21 Inver Grove Heights $arbara Avenue & 67th Street 535 79 1 0
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 734 I 12 0 0
23 Mendota Heights End af Kenndon Avenue 2176 614 222 12
24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 9$0 tIX} i 0
Note. ARTS dasa missing for I2.5 dnys
Page 14 Aviation tiaise & Satellite Programs
I I
• Metropal�itan Airports Commissian
, . Ten Laudest Aircraft Noise Events Identifie�d
RMT #l: Xeraces Ave. & 41st St.
Minneapolis
I}ate 'I'ime � � - A!D
OSi! 81'97 ! 2:54:35 B727 94. i D
05J0719713:04:17 B727 90.1 A
05/ 14/97 12:43:08 DC9 89.8 D
OS/07/9717:52:59 B727 89.3 A
OSI1 tt97 1 i:47:02 B727 89.3 D
OS/11l9719:38:42 B727 883 D
05/03/9711:34:10 DC9 8"l.9 D
05/11/97 20:19:4$ B727 8�.9 D
OSl1419719:09:37 B727 87.6 D
OSl17/9712:38:34 B747 $7.5 D
RMT #3: W. Elmwood S� & Belmant Ave.
Minneapotis
Date Time AlC Maa �
'I�pe Lcvel
OS/1819712:53:5$ B727 99.3 D
05106197 12; I 1:47 B721 96.4 D
fl5/Obl9719:38:24 B727 96.1 D
05/20/97 $:20:2Q DC9 95.8 D
05/20/9714:55:51 DC9 95.4 A
Q5ll8n}717:22:41 B727 94.7 D
OS/20/9711:34:40 DC9 94.6 D
05/17/9711:31:24 DC9 93.7 D
OS/ I$197 16:08: S 1 B?47 93.1 D
05118i97 20:32:28 B 72? 93.1 D
;�
RMT #2: Fretnont Ave. & 43rd S�
�
Minneaaolis
Date 'Tirne
AS108147 4:49:36
45/O7197 I5:12:06
OS/18/97 16:09:23
05/18/97 12:54:32
OS114191 19.04:34
OS/07/97 12:13:37
OS/07/97 15:02:12
OS/11/97 I6:15:42
OS114197 i6:48: i9
05/03/97 16:40:57
,
,
��
A!C !
1�'Pa !
�.
B74'� �
8727 �
B747 j
B727 �
B72�'
B747;
B727i
B72'7 �
DC4�.
B727 ; i
RMT #4. Oakland
Datt Tgme
05/19197 11:56:33
osn��� �7:zs:oa
05/14/97 19:08:52
OS/08/97 11:31:13
05/14f97 11:21:39
45JO It97 I 12I:5$
05/OS/97 20:28:17
OS/03/97 21:05:08
0511$!97 18:37:00
45i 18197 16:4$:24
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 da��s
A�•iation Naise & Satellite Programs
A!C �
�j
�
B72'7,
B727i
B72'7;
SW3 ;
B72'7,
D7�7k
B727
B727 I
B72�
B727; I
I
!
�
Max
Levet
�
+& 49th S�.
Max
Level
.�
1aa.2
94,4
99.1
98.9
98.9
9$.2
97.8
97.5
97.3
97.2
�� �
Page I S
Metragolitan Airgorts Cammissian
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #5: 12th Ave. & SSth S�
Minneapolis
Date Tirne 1 � Max �
Levci
05116l97 t I:S5:12 B727 I05.7 D
OS/1S/97 8:52:56 B727 105,4 D
OS/17/9711:31:05 DC9 104.6 D
O5/02i9718:55:1� DC9 104.5 D
Q5I08147II:37:24 8727 104.1 D
OS/08l9713:14:47 8727 104.1 D
OS/O1/9711:34:42 DC9 103.5 D
45117i97 I2: i$:52 B727 103,3 I}
QS/17/9? 13:21:Q9 DC9 1Q3.1 D
OS/17/97 9:31:24 B727 102.7 D
' A;MT #"7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St
Richfield
Ds�#e 'Iit�ne � I.�vel �
OS124/97 7:15:02 B727 102A D
OSl14/47 9:38:54 B727 101.1 D
OS/11/9716:27:2$ B727 99,9 D
05I1619718:36:21 B727 99.'7 D
45119t97 7:55:34 8727 94.7 D
OS/19l97 9;37:43 DC9 99.6 D
OS/14/9717:20:10 B727 99.3 D
05/16l'97 1S:OO:S I B727 99.2 D
45l14147 16:25: I4 8727 49.0 D
OS/14/9716:15:32 B727 98.9 D
RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th S�
Minneapolis
�� ,�� A/C Max �
'I�=pe Lcvel
45lI819716:4$:OQ $727 108.6 D
OS/06/9718:28:48 B727 107.8 D
OS/�08/9'i 17;10:45 B727 1q7.5 D
05115197 9:3�:43 B727 1ff1.5 D
OSt'08/'97 i'1:30:49 B727 107.4 D
OS/13/9712:10:59 B727 107.4 D
OS/14/9711:2I:10 B727 10'7.1 D
051161'9711:57:50 B73i 106.4 D
OS/0+5/9719:37:48 B727 106.7 D
OS/17/'97 9:24:49 B727 1Q6.7 D
RMT #8; Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St�
MinneapoLis
�� ,�� A!C M� �
'I�+pe Level
OS! 16t'47 7:27.40 DC4 9?.4 D
OS/11/9? 11:32:06 DC9 96.0 D
OS/13/97 4:07:42 DC9 94.2 A
05/i4/97 i6:17:18 B737 93.9 D
OSli6l97 15: i9:08 B727 93.5 D
OS/11/97 9:39:37 DC9 93.2 D
OS/OS/97 9:27:35 B727 93.1 D
O5t141'97 6:27:14 DC9 93.0 D
45J 14/97 9:17:54 DC4 93.4 D
OS/13/9711:21:O1 DC9 91.9 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 da}�s
Page 16 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Mevapol�itan Airports Cammissioa
i
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #9: Sarataga S� & Hartford Ave.
S� Paul
Uate T`une Ty� Max �
I.cvd
05103J97 12: I0: t? B747 97.9 D
QS/17/'9? 16:?A:04 8747 97.0 D
OS/ 16/97 22:06:28 DC 10 91.4 D
OSl03/9715:12:14 B747 91.2 D
O51i7197I2:24:3'T B737 88.5 L}
OS/17/97 23:43:13 B727 88.3 A
OS/ 16P97 19:08:02 DC 1Q 88.1 D
45/1b197 1 t:04:18 DC9 86.7 A
45i171'9712;38:59 B74? 86.7 D
OS/17l'97 21:42:4q B727 $S.9 A
R;MT #llr Finn Sti & Scheffer Ave.
S� Paul
AlC Maz
/ Date Tinne �� I.cvd �
05l t 51ti7 $:11:34 B737 89.2 D
Q5116197 i6:05:58 B74? 8$.l D
OS/02/97 5:49:20 DC9 &S.3 D
OS/07/97 9:14:04 DC9 $S.4 . D
05107/97I0:06:12 DC9 84.7 A
45!!8l97 l9:18:24 DC 10 $4.7 D
OS/2Q/9710:29:23 MD80 &�.2 A
OS/13/97 7:51:13 DC9 83.7 D
05103t9712:1�.47 B747 83.6 D
OS/ I5l97 11:23:2$ CL55 83.1 D
RMT #1Q: Itasca Ave. & Bawdoin St.
St. Paul �
�
i}ate "ISme � i � A1D
Ltvel
OSIi 7i97 12:38:34 B747 ;� 102.8 D
O5/17/97 16:19:34 B747 3� 102.0 D
OS/03/97 12:09:53 B747 �� 101.3 D
Q5/031�7 15: i 1:4b B74'� {� l Od.9 D
05116l97 16:05:38 B74? �� 100.5 D
OS/17/97 21:43:21 B727 �) 95.7 A
OSI16197 19:07:36 DC 1Q i� 94.1 D
05118197 19:18.08 DC 10 � I 93.0 D
OS/36l97 22:06:05 DC 10 �� 92.2 D
OS/21/97 13:OO:Q3 B727 ' � 90.5 A
g;MT #12: Alton St� & Rockwoad Ave.
I
� S� Paul;
i
Date 'IYme �C i � AlD
1�He � Level
05I20147 �:53: I9 SW3 ;� 98.4 D
45/06197 24.52:11 BFA2 �� 88.5 D
OS/15/97 7:47:40 B757 ;� 86.1 D
OS/13/97 13:44:0$ B737 i� 85.8 D
05J05/97 21:�17:30 DC9 �� $4.9 D
45l07/97 l6:18:55 875.7i� 84.8 A
OS/10/97 13:15:29 DC9 I� 84.g p
OS/ I7/97 6:10: l4 B727 �, � $4.6 A
OSl2 i197 ?:30:36 BE80, � $4.4 D
O5l17/97 6:53:41 B737 � 84.3 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 du��s
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
Paae 17
:1�tetropolitan Airports Commission
Ten Loudest Aircraft Naise Events Identified
RMT #t3: Sout6east End of Mohican Court
Mendata Heights
Dste Time .�,� uvel `�
OSl1$!97 l2:19:56 B727 96.0 D
05102/97 6:09:dS B�27 89.8 D
OS/16/97 9:50:31 B727 89.7 D
05/18197 9:3$:09 DC9 89.5 D
OS/16/97 9:47:10 B727 88.6 D
051211971I:25:56 L7C9 $8.6 D
05107/9717:15:05 SF34 8$.0 D
OS/02197I6:14:35 B727 87.3 D
05/07!'97 22:16:47 B'I27 $7.2 D
QS/21l9717:30:11 B727 86.6 D
RMT #15: Cullon St� & Le�ngton Ave.
Mendota �Ieights
A1C Msa
I}s�te'ISme Z� Levd `�
OS/1fi197 9:50: ! 1 B72? 99.7 D
OS/16/97 9:46:23 B727 97.7 D
OSl07/97 6:34:44 DC9 97, i D
05/07!'9715:19:57 B737 96.9 D
OS/16/97 9:25.24 L7C9 96.9 D
OS/t35J97 6:09:IS DC9 96.1 A
QSlQ8l971Q:32:44 DC9 94.9 A
QS/08/9713:02:26 DC9 93.9 D
OS/0$/9710:4b:13 DC9 93.6 A
05/0719715:09:14 B75? 93.3 D
RMT #24t lst St. & McKee S�
Eagan
�� ,� A!C Ma1c �
T;yge I.evel
OS/02J9716:16:2I B727 101.2 D
OSl�219715:10:43 B727 1Q0.4 D
OSI17/97 20:25:17 B72'i 99.4 D
45l02t9715:34:05 B747 99.1 D
OS121i'97 9:40:01 B72'7 98.7 D
OSl10/97 t6:59:16 B727 9$.6 D
OS/02I97I7:16:18 B72"I 98.1 D
05/17/9714:53:17 $72"7 97.4 D
OS/17/471�:25:40 B72� 97.4 D
OS/17/9717:33:53 B727 97.4 D
RMT #26: Avalon Ave. & �ias Lane
Eagan
�� ,� AIC Max �
'IjTpe Ltvel
QS/1$/9717:05:11 DC9 103.0 D
O5/i 1!'4� 8:0I:54 DC9 102.5 D
OS/11/97 4:35.25 B727 101.9 D
QS/ 11197 8:00:42 DC9 t O t.8 D
OS/08/9714:52:42 DC9 101.4 D
OSJl 8/9� 17:41:04 DC9 I O t.3 D
OS/08/97 21:06:26 8727 101.2 D
05J11J9T 8: �o:sa B727 101.0 D
OS/l8/9717:11:52 B737 IOQ,4 D
Q511$i97 16:54:35 DC4 140.3 D
Nore.• ARTS data missing for 12.5 dati�s
Page 1$ Aviatian Noise & Sate!lite Pragrams
� Metropolitan Airports Commission
. Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
!I
RIVIT #17: 84th S� & 4th Ave.
Bloomington
Date T'ime � Max �
Level
OS/OS/9710:15:08 B727 101.2 D
OS/11/97 7:08:23 B727 98.2 D
OS/O1/9719:32:49 DC9 97.2 D
OS/15/97 4:57:16 B727 96.9 D
OS/O1/97 8:47:39 B727 96.8 D
OS/18/9? 22:53:05 B727 96.7 D
OS/14/9715:03:45 B747 96.5 D
OS/O1/9710:27:05 B727 95.6 D
OS/03/97 4:59:07 B727 95.5 D
OS/18/9716:16:56 B727 95.3 D
RMT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St
Bloomington
�� ,t� A/C Maa �
Type I.evd
OS/11/97 8:42:32 B727 99.7 D
OS/18P97 23:17:56 DC9 99.6 D
OS/08/97 8:59:37 B727 99.5 D
OS/11/97 7:46:18 B727 98.6 D
OS/l7/97 6:55:45 B727 98.5 D
OS/17/97 8:43:35 B727 98.4 D
OS/19/97 9:10:24 DC9 98.1 D
05/04/9712:47:11 B727 97.7 D
OS/17/97 7:09:49 B727 97.7 D
05/19/97 6:20:30 B737 97.7 D
RMT #18: 75th S� & 17th Ave.
�
Rich6eld
�
i
Date 'Iqme
OS/17/'97 8:50:28
OS/18/97 22:52:49
OS/17/97 8:43:22
OS/OS/97 10:14:51
OS/10/97 12:26:16
OS/10/97 18:21:45
OS/lll'97 7:08:04
OS/O1/97 19:32:34
OS/17/97 12:42:03
OS/04/97 8:41:27
A/C
�'P� i
B�
B727E
B727;
B727�
�
B747i
B747i
B727�
DC9I
DC91
B727 ,
Max
I.eve!
1
102.1
101.7
101.3
101.3
101.2
100.7
100.6
100.0
99.4
RMT #20: 75th S� & 3rd Ave.
� i)
Richfield'
I�
Date T�ime
OS/20/97 6:13:59
OS/17/97 12:42:21
OS/ 17/97 7:09:53
OS/ 17/97 10:54:12
OS/21/97 6:14:47
OS/ 13/97 8:18:23
OS/06/97 5:52:49
OS/ 17/97 7:31:45
OS/ 10/97 7:16:12
OS/ 1 l /97 7:31:37
A/C !
T9P�i
B�
DC9'
B727,
DC9�
EA32
BA3II
MDl 1�
DC 10
DC 10
DC9�
Maa
Level
96.6
93.8
90.8
90.2
88.0
87.5
85.9
85.8
85.5
853
�
A/D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 da�•s
Aviation Noise & Satellite Pro�rams Page 19
Metropolitan Airpores Cammission
Ten Laudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified
RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th S�
Inver Grove Heights
Date Time �� Max �
Ltvel
OS/21N717:28:15 B727 92.8 D
05/ 16/97 1 �:11:13 B727 91.9 A
OS/22J971�:30:52 B727 89.4 D
fl51021'47I7:25:12 B727 89.1 D
OS/17/9715:10:50 B727 8$.6 D
O5/02J97 8:13:25 B72i $$.2 D
05I20/97 t3:27:27 B727 88.1 D
Q5102147 9:45:49 B72? 86.7 D
OS/0219712:21:39 DC9 86.1 D
05/ 17/97 15:42:51 DC9 85.9 D
RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave.
Mendota Heights
i}ate lime � I�vd `�
QSI18197 12:i9:28 B727 I03.4 D
05/21/97 20:52:46 DC9 103.0 D
OS/02/9716:14:Q2 B727 102.9 D
OSJ07/97 1 t:38:40 DC9 102.b D
OSl1319711:25:i6 DC9 101.9 D
OS/16/97 9:49:57 B727 101.9 D
OS/16/97 9:46:q1 B727 l01.4 D
QS102197 t7:29:43 B727 t0i.1 D
QSlQ7/4717:14:33 B727 101.1 D
OS/17/9715:09:22 6737 100.9 D
RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail
Inver Grnve Heights
A/C Max
Date TSme rny� Leve! �
OS/IS/9710:21:17 B727 90.1 A
OS/15/9710:21:27 B727 $9.6 A
OSII5197I0:21:49 B727 84.3 A
QS/Q8J47 i 7.34:20 DC9 88.9 A
05l21/97 7:35:39 B727 $7.7 D
OS/07/9712:17:55 B727 $7.4 D
OS/2 t197 4:40:5$ EA32 $7.4 D
OSf21l9719.06:34 B727 $7.2 D
05/16/97 8:41:49 B72'7 $6.9 D
OS/0219717:I'7.25 B72'7 86.8 D
RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
Eagan
I}ate Z3me A/C Maz �
'I'�pe LeQcl
OSli419714;Q3:32 B737 46.2 A
OS/11/9717:12:49 DC9 95.5 A
QS/14/9714:02:08 B727 95.5 A
05108197 12: i 0.5 i DC9 95.1 A
OS/48l97 11:45: ! 8 DC4 45.0 A
OS/08/9712:17:16 DC9 95.0 A
OS/08/9712:09:45 DC9 94.8 A
OS! 19197 6:25:47 B73? 94.7 A
OS/O1/97 6:50:54 BA31 94.5 A
OS/20l97 6:23:2! B727 93.4 D
Note: ARTS data missing for 12.5 days
Page 20 A�•iation ivaise & Satellite Progtams
i
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Flight Track Base Map
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System
A�•iation tioise & Satellite Pro�rams �I Pase ? I
�^' =:`'. • : � � . '•- ~���\ \,1r��
,:n'•i'�•-••``,+� . :�:\, r,4 � r
:+}rR.r�`��:l:�,.. . �' \���\��.�� ���� �
,�' `?:y t�������'.:.; ` "��;`�1T.r, '�`�
:.,;:� 1{,..},>. . . �.�.,��� � i
_ �;�aS�1 t�,:�E�"". ��� r J
' _ .�. tr�,�i I�t�:.., .��� �
:i:-= _ _• :'v`..����f��.W�[�.�� , �.���Mti�-�1►�� ���,
�;;,r"�.;T=:.>_-�_�`14.,,f4:+��-y�y��►�y �:� i\a,'.�„"c�'.
:%�;,:o:::..'r:a� ..'t�' �i��,'y+a%'--'�':.::�:: - " _
:. -_=s 4.^,�
'R'����� ,^7I'i..:�'4i�J� �r• `•,•�
=�Pi ����i✓.':::::- - ._:..��=�>:c-..
' �4��"+'����%;.�f'%''::.^s:�',�"y'�!�.` t �� �:� �`" .
�\„�'+:,,� �.���i�,�l%'l'i"�i�'�•- - .
•� �„. � �„ ./.f ;�;j i�'.%. .w�
• ,y._ 1�}'.����i!' �'�' •-E✓'" .
,. . ..� � ���w i': f�" ��i/ •i� ^ . ,
� /� ti
i�^" �=1'J'
_.+;a„y . �"j`�Mr������r`�, .
�.�.:c-' �:•W.� " `-�-'^'yC"�,�+'!i i���Jf '
�= ��ti .i.rR.. •:�,:
�'n�. ��1 `� � � `:� v.. � � �' -
► �:`'�� �.:'; : " ' ''•' ` : � v
-.ii�r'r;!�i " Y , _ ..
,�:.',?i��_
.,,r��__'-_.,3..� . . .
:��i'IIw��.�►� ��\\\ • • . . .
in.. � I1\A i ��_'a: '
�,�fJT:.:�Mi�' ,�q,�.� ;�; .� �':`•-.
�.��p +G3`
�`.r�t1��'.F��;.....aa�1 �� 'Y.�.'1U,2�:, . . • . ' .
,;�,� - � . __�,����1���` 4-ws �. - e'
'w,�h ���� . _Yi�� � . A�i
�`���'h\�'-}ai.�l� .lw,•: . . . s . '. � . _ • 1 . =7t
��..��"� ,�ti�`y'`.�w`•\�q1{ �iei - _ �
� ���:.,,-��'.�'tiic:���i; �'' .. � .
' `'^x'"'.::`��ry,{; Fi..-, ' . • . . ., ... �
" - "' ,s',` `�Ai.�� . _ . .. .. .
�1 �� ' `���y� �,'1�'�t �_ �-�::~.�.��� .
-,�_�� .n . •': . '.- l•�-Z ���'!r.� �\' ^ �` . . ' .
���,r�D .'. s�i'"�.,,���,,,' .� ..
=_T �,: � .-='��= � ��''i' �. �1`?`-'-� :, .. . .
-.-;•.:• -► ti• �� '
►;:r.iF:MF, r--' ' - ��'';�.►`.;F1ti ` " � ,
�% �,-� t ,✓'f .. � . .. ���� `�!i/��' K '•r�. .. ..
f, .r-- � �= y�t�r�: � –'<. .
.. � �w��;" .. .r� • , - _
' � »s�t=�:' �' �:s:�`3.' ��; . '
� ���; .:� .l�d��.��•`'.'"-"�� `a ". L;y`
� \"'"1M. . 9j � `
' � "r+`�.i� «r� .,i'` `�`•`,r.: �
, ::,�Z„+ � : - : ` �� 4
, . . , ,.�
. . . .s H:; . `',•, �`��
•�� ` ..�.`� %'i�:: �}���� \
� ; �t°: �.. • j;q`:':.�::
. . - , ' ;y'_ . .t��.�. '
. . • . _ �,�,�:'>a�. `, ti���
. . . ' - . �^i= ~... . �.4,, �. � �\..iS`_.
�4�3��;%fR�y'.,.: \.
,1��`'�� � sp�4-•r, ,� -•�
� ���1���Fr .f:%> c:,• �
\���1 •�ti."' - ,
r\�Z � c �;i=;,''-.:��-' •.,
���;•;1i .�ti;� �•';•fl:
=`�-ti 1�t.�r� :):�:' �
�� _ -,�!.' ���1 •1���r�
=:!'� � ' ' V� ♦
' - �r"': .. N`�'i- '+1��
, i I�I's t'r ,
`j :�i�' X r
.�,.:�: �.�`�:�!:�: {�5�;�'�,"
' :�j:: ':�c'..i�,�1�1\!
-: �'' • {:- .;yiti.'s�.t7��n,....�
� ' • ��<<:(`VL����''�
�. - .�.;,�;�L1
: : =_ ;,.._ .. ;.
. _. _ ., .,�._
; �•_
. _ y ��_ � ' �
��\ -�-`.�����
. ` j�___=i�
��` ' _
Fv' � '. '
i. �•'�D�
i� a _
�� r:' : . �.
��'�G!�._ _�.�R.
������ j�,: v �._ .
:�i�'L�s'�%r'i' �
���.'» _ "— — •• -
--_��-,...IF�,� - . -_
� w� .
�.�i'�j�P:•.
\�: � �`.�� i ; •
�'t� /.!!�•'
� �� � � .
. . �.
� ..
;��._ . , �
`�����'= �l.: �` :^+` ''`�::�<__ _ ' _ ; ��
� ', '
� K� �\ �-.� � . .. �r
.A� `�`\= ��:J �` ' �t` =�.f�'� �
- ����Nti'�-� � � • ` �\:'
.. `\` �`\` ` _=._��.'..`. •`Y� � =�
' `1�� `V (�\: � ' ' ` �.\
_ .�::• �;, .-__ - ; . ..
- . c'��;,� � -'":'� _ , "�' • -
_�' - � . ,. �� =G=` =�.:`'. -"
��;_�_ '�:. =�:� �h:., _':. '� �
�-� =- =��;__�; ' _ \�����: `�,� ,�: _ � .
`-. ;:, _� _ _ ,`- _ ` .'••`�c:� ` � .:..;,''- .
�;.:rs-� - - ��;.;,: ;.`- . ,
'j: :s.wi r . �� _ `��� `% � �'!; � .'>>•: _: �
;i�.: • - �� �i':i.,.. iF�'� .''��''\`;
. V��� �r..�� ..�.�
� 'Cv=�'�—ri '� ��� - 'I.•.�J::
. .�'� � '♦ � �-' ^ � �'��S
•. ;!� �, • '•�`�t:�`- • ..
• � \ ..s � � � �, •• � �.
. . ' . •. r . ..5�� ,:'~� �� � ���: �`'
�'���J . � ::`�`.-�
:�% ��, � .�s� :��`�\_
�., � ��; /: . , �; ��,,;�.•. �
. . • .,,,� ,,,;� �_ q , ,� . • w �;�
� ` . ��._:' !%,..:, f.,,.r�:.�•.�t��
. �K:�:� , �`_,��' \`\ "\
.• ' .. C •. -';C' � 1';y a ��.
. . ;�`��ii.��.:y ���� �.
^•! ' . • . . J= ". � � �i1 �
,� • . `.`^'` ::�.•-�`.``° ?' �\ ���\
. ' - . `=, �%TK �:Y `-',�.�� ��.; :_��� �.
.�.:� • . ' . . �. ..�.:�_•�_,�:��"••\ .
_ _ �l.:a.."
;'4�'''+:;._-.�;'. :`~"�,�. _��,���
.
? .,
���'i ��` , ° ���\` � �v � T �
f t ���`� �,�C;�l'f/.i�/
`�.tii+��• ,,' ` �}' '•+' - ' � �--..`��•n.• a �J
�.c .,b: '.'. ' ��•� ��`
.„,.�_;; ", , r ���� 'r-„`.,��i��7�
+s.-� :4 ' . ' : . �.. . _ ��� ��, /
_ _ -� "+� i �-'� �i�'`�`` �"\�;.`.� "+�„`_.��.��
: %M i . .:����.,
. _ - . _ ' �. ' ".�a�rt,�`= 4'.'!� '`�-...: _
• _ ����. '�:�1"-''--: -, -. -
,' ... :ti , �,u�r:.�„,., _
' r n�:.K�'' ' � «s '�ii�,:� '� �` 'y_. . '
+, .. � �,�r y ' •i-'�.�w.'��� ��:,�::'. - � -
� . ljir t �' y, s �i��7i � a . ` , • .
. + �����,�,,��� 7l►�i'�✓r+i'/ ' . .
' y�,�r�, « ��,�w,,,.-
«'t • f.. �
::a-- - . "` t�a �1-,3la �yj'c'�'�' • - �- , - ,
_ '�f w"` .. P �
_ : cc`�,!{5., _:;;�p�. ,. .. . ,
: . - • , _ �T , `��y't::�.;,. y,I��l'' ,
,-':f='"y�.i:.��* . c%ti•.��'o.�',�•- �"',
���. - y %�. et",. -
�„�-5� ay�+l=..`•� t;:��i,^..:'fL;'r.
.""i..��i'��r+..r�,.. �� ` �: . `4i>...,!
�..�r" '.���wy. 'a . '• ' .
_�-� "�' •.r'�,'•
11M►yw...��.�4.""'`\�i ; �. . .
v�.. .
'!.l��i.,i�a•,,....��c• .:` . . . � .
�����
-�-`�.i;: �,,7t\�;; " r'
�'" ��i1\l�- �1�� '.:_''• - �
^+w —`\�``\�! 4 : .:� :: _ ' :":.��' " " . ._ �".11►, �� �l ' �i
\�v.`G�,�.^ �:_� :AS��?K':�`'..`�ri'�!��, :4�'•"�•'� � .�
v�, �1iF �a S • �I ,
���`y'���``,\'�lra+,:���' ' "'• - , _�,14":'.:',Y`,�,i.
�ay�.� �`•` ti-+i � ' " ';:'M`.iy��
y��~="u�w�.`` l�:1;��� y�y'� ` . , - . � . ,.�:
'�h� ��.�� � F �
' r��y ,`.�i\�t, :`,,, � • . . � .
- _ � � �t� ``"*;"1: ��i.�i,.,.' . _-���'y.�:� _ '`t '
_�c,� ~' ; . •�? `'�. ••� � j ""J' r.!'. :•,::. �'�� ` `�� '
,±, ' . � �F . ;"i_� �.,... -.
•"��-•�c`a„""` ` '�� ,�—��.�.,�,"„�".' ���_..^; , .�.
"�t�"ia= • '` i ,� `�," ;,: . " ,
:��•"'�.!� �.� . , �,,,,,'"t;a�fN' „"'...` v � `• '.
`i__ .��� \�,� -
-;..,;� � `a.�.:� �r � - ..
,��; _;- =�.` -� ... � � � �;�,���„�,.: . �.
'"�- ' = u �(��.11�i��t44���� � °'��'.�'`"•'
:%_ •s b,',
�:-- ,:. '?� '''-'�" �:�! i'r ` :•
M�.. i .` �:�II►•�"''��` :; x��'!�`'
. c������'� ��I'� _, • . :� �"1
' ":,�: i� �~ �'� �4 I . .
:'� �
��.�:;y�`�. ��� �.� i'��'� '� =��`~ �
, . �;�� � 4R� ������,�I1�, .�;M�,�a;
,' ..� �. � �... �':r,���i!d�!''% `.,; �:;,�:
'� - ��w z=-;,,�'%-'`• .:' � � �� a.�.
�'`.I.. .. ' � �` f���v y. ' I : , . ` �
'�, . . � � x„ / �
a . ;�,,�� . l...����`�'.'aiti�F"� .'� '�. \
: •�s�l '�„ �
� j �.'� , �� ''Y::rg�. at `\\� �'':L.
r a� � \l��\`� i� \
y +. S � ��\
'll�� '' K+ '_ ' . .._ \�'� w.. i ��:�u,.�\
. . . . . . :�
Metropolitan Airports Commission �
. � Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A)
May O1 to May 31,1997 '
Noise Monitor Locadons �
Date
��
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
��
Mo. Ldn
#1
G0.3
61.5
56.6
58.1
58.2
57.2
61.9
62.0
58.5
54.2
58.5
58.8
59.1
59.1
60.7
55.4
54.5
60.0
58.8
59.7
57.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
�
59. I
#2
5
57.9
52.1
51.8
*
52.8
60.1
62.8
57.0
51.3
55.2
51.0
52.5
56.8
55.4
49.8
49.8
58.1
54.2
53.1
52.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*•
*
*
5
#3
�
62.1
*
57.3
63.2
57.7
61.1
67.2
66.6
61.2
60.5
57.5
59.9
64.5
59.6
63.9
60.5
61.2
65.6
60.4
63.1
63.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
63.4
#4
�
66.4
66.3
63.5
65.2
64.9
65.4
66.4
67.2
66.9
60.7
65.4
66.4
65.2
66.0
67.0
65.3
64.3
69.3
65.4
65.9
63.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
�
66.0
#5
�
73.5
73.8
71.4
71.5
75.8
70.7
72.5
77.3
74.4
65.8
72.4
73.8
74.2
73.5
76.6
73.7
72.1
743
74.5
74.2
70.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
�
73.1
#S
�
77.5
74.8
75.2
76.1
74.8
77.0
71.6
79.6
76.6
68.8
78.3
76.6
74.8
76.8
79.5
78.7
74.2
79.1
76.8
76.4
69.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
-
76.0
#7
-
67.6
68.8
67.1
62.4
70.4
66.1
57.2
71.6
71.0
55.8
68.4
69.0
65.2
71.1
70.5
*
64.7
67.5
70.5
68.8
*
*
*
*
*_
*
*
*
*
*
*
�
67.6
Page 25 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
#8 #9 #10 #11 #12
68.9 56.2 56.8 ' 49.7 51.3
65.0 523 54.9 , 52.2 51.8
693 56.7 61.0 47.0 51.2
67.5 63.2 64.6 4b.4 50.7
67.9 55.9 57.8 , 53.0 52.9
67.7 41.6 54.6 '' S0.3 53.6
65.8 43.2 59A � 51.4 55.1
70.7 51.0 57.7 � 49.6 56.1
70.6 60.2 58.1 j 58.2 56.1
60.9 50.0 56.9 ; 53.0 53.0
68.0 45.5 51.2 � 47.4 52.9
69.5 50.9 51.8 i 48.8 52.2
63.2 54.9 59.8 i 55.3 55.6
69.7 52.1 54.4 j 47.9 51.0
69.7 523 60.1 � 55.6 51.8
67.4 60.8 64.7 i 56.6 61.6
72.2 63.6 64.8 ' S9.3 62.4
64.5 59.3 589 � 54.7 53.6
68.1 46.2 48.0 i 49.0 53.1
70.1 57.3 59.3 ' S5.8 55.1
66.1 51.2 59.1 i 43.8 51.5
* * * � * *
* * * * *
* * * 4 * *
* * * I� * *
* * * * *
�
* * * * *
i
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * � * *
* * * � * *
68.6 56.1 59.6 � 53.2 55.3
�
' Less thun rxenn• fnur hol rs ��f data avaifahle
Note: ARTS ciara misi �np (or 12.� dars
Metropolitan Qirports Commissian
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Air�raft Ldn dB{A)
May 01 to May 31,1997
Naise Monitor Locations
Date #13 #14 #15 #16 #i'7 #1$ #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24
, � 62.8 5$.0 63.2 71.2 65.2 71.5 70.5 57.3 * 64.0 72.1 62.3
2 64.3 70, t 65.2 73.7 53.8 58.9 ' S�.9 53.5 62.7 62.9 73.7 56.7
3 443 60.4 52.1 67.7 65.1 67.8 63.5 67.6 42.7 54.$ SS.Q 52.8
4 56.5 62.4 59. i 66.4 6Q.3 64.1 67.4 54.6 54.4 54.Q 66.2 b0.3
5 52.1 62.7 * * 61.$ faBZ 67.2 55.7 51.4 57.5 60.2 52,5
� 59.9 b6.9 t54.1 71.0 61.4 f76.8 64.9 58.4 60.1 61,0 f>8.0 58.2
'7 649 67.8 73.I 74.0 61.9 68.3 67.4 50.6 59.9 61.2 �5.1 54.8
$ S63 67.5 64.7 71.3 55.2 62.4 61.4 58,2 56.0 63.7 65.7 65.3
9� 4b.3 639 65.2 72.3 54.0 70.0 68.4 60.3 47.1 59.7 58.7 7Q.5
10 61.5 66.1 68.9 76.9 62.3 68.4 71.2 53.8 61.0 59.8 71.7 7Q.7
11 47.5 65.2 54.3 73.3 6?.2 68.1 b6.2 55.3 57.6 58.6 6Q.4 56.5
12 51.0 64.1 53.8 71.5 58.$ 67.8 67.1 55.8 50.8 58,2 61.0 65. i
13 fr6•2 C�8•7 70•3 77..6 59.7 S6.S 52.0 52.1 63.0 62.7 74.6 61.1
I 4 53.2 6fi.3 60.1 72.9 60.7 � 1.5 58.9 Sb.8 50.4 b i.4 64.6 63.0
15 47.9 64.3 53.9 71.9 66.0 ffl.8 70.6 56.$ * 60.2 57.0 63.2
Ib 5�.1 65,3 * * 61.4 64.6 63,7 52.6 55.I 58.5 67.3 69.6
17 58.2 68.3 60.6� 70.5 63.4 72.1 7Q.0 61.1 5$.5 61.5 IS9.8 60A
1$ 62.8 67.7 60.8 72.2 68.Q ?4.0 70.5 59.0 61.2 60.5 70.5 52.7
19 39.6 64.0 56.5 67.3 66.4� 74.4 72,9 58.0 53.1 59.5 59.2 b49
2Q 58.8 58.6 59.0 72.0 62.1 67.3 64.5 66.1 60.9 61.3 Ei8.8 60.7
21 b4.2 7d.5 65.8 �4.0 6 i.9 7dA 68.2 57.6 64.2 64.6 '74.3 63.1
22 * * * * * * * * * * * *
z� * * * * * * * * * * * *
24 * * * * * * * * * * * *
25 � * * * * * * * * * * *
26 * * * * * * * * * * * :�
27 * * * * * * * * * * * *
28 * * � * * * * * * * * *
29 * * * * * * * * * * * *
30 * * * * * � * * * * * *
31 * * * * * � * � * * � �
Mn. Ldn 6!.5 68.0 65.8 73.6 52.9 68.9 67.1 59.� 60.5 6�.1 71.0 6$.8
' Less than h. enn• fnur haurs �(tta�rt ati•aila6te
Note: ARTS data missing fnr 1?.5 ctn�•s Aviation Noise & 5atelli[e Pro=rams Pa�e 26
it � �ii��
' �� N,���.,, •,•rr,.w'^,
��.pi;.1,'�;�'i�a' pu, ,�. �
k�����4W����u� �;�'i�'��'���� ,��„� �� P Monthl C om lalnt
�, � y p
���� ���� s�� ��'����i '1���;�,�.:.
�,�00
� 3,000
E�
Z
� 2,500 — -----
P�-�
O2,000 --� �
U �
w �
p 1,soo -- �
W -�
� 1,000 — �
� ��
' '� 500 �� � �
���b" ., _ � -
- � . £�,�"T�vY . - - ;k ',
s-c'.. t�i�'`����,#: Q� ,�� � `}.
�b����;��'`���,"��<��+ � �`'���e�?'9 V 1a
.
�..,
�:.�� _ ��. E� i.����'��.�t`.
�:�_...,.. . __ _ __ _ :=7;•:'),`�.�.'� :.:�F,�.:
" ' _ "�:R�: _ ' "' _
- - - _ - = __ --,;;�__:;'.;�.
" ` fi:r�::.i;_:=�-.:'.;_
I `C'
,7 "
�: .�:
�. ,��,:_; _ .
' ' `::i''� y'i.a ;;,�i
_ - ' `:;j�:';:1; �'::�'.6�':� '.�F�:� '
� .!i �e�:�.-. t':'""_ k' - �:]. . �t�:j;�5'�.
II'. ���'� � ,'li, � :i� - _ - i.!�;1 :
:t4".�� �� y �i �i:
!'e'�'��.:'. . { :: ��.�
?.t. - � �.�;�=.�''i,:.,�,
�. � e�
��: :� : : _ � . .:'
. , ..��� .. ;,;.�.
, _ ,�;� , ,�;:
- �.,:� �:_.
;,a � ��,,�
`n �� i �
,1d
. ; � ,,..�._ .... ,.,. �..
it:i�� ;�� '�i�:��
��yi;�"a�„
._ .�....�.r_._.�...__..:i_�i_.!.;t'Ed,...�.,.�.��_u3�'"�w:i�ta..�ti.tr:',
"7�;.I�.��': h�:.r�i:�. �t� �R.:y�.(.��Etf�4���q1)�Y�'.i������+t��v'�,ty�F�}F%��i.
's
tl�: ���.i.Ll�.' !!!
.`
Summar
Y
■ (i � � �j� li
� ,
�i i i;l I i�
I! II �
I! �.
Ii��i i�; III I.i�
(�I� 'r ;�': 1i�
.k,�,�*���,��`��f;-"�, ;• l�j`��1 � " 1�jy`,' ' �9`�' ,9y' ,�j`�' �c3N' `cj`�'
t.�"�p�t;,, , i�, . � '�:; bet � t�� bet ,�• _ bei g at`�..,.,, ar1 c'� c�� ay
��e�t'N,x,r. , pc�? . �e�! ��,eta ',..'; ��o.: e�pS� �� P4 1�11
�
. .:..;,.
�"O 4:'
;,,i :,��. - :,:,:::y.; �_�,,,,-�:.-;_. ,:110.., � . .. .fi. - , .,.�..,.
,.:,.:,..�. �,,.,:,..::,..
�4.. :: . .
�. �,n�: R:�h _.,f� __ __ • ..
,F�.:�.
�':i�!� i
" 1t,5 ' -
a��, '
7. � ; C� ;:r`
i�: `:I!
i"j{'
i�;b .
i;".i �. a
��i:; FA i
a
�.I Y';'� ii�fii:� a.�. �
!;: .,... ::
�'� '��� ..,;�
:a.:4�
�ii. �� �.� ip���": H:` i
' �� k��� � �1.��:� Ii�L'i�_.f �.�n.� :Ip !�:�ri} . �..
:��. ,.��..._...�... ,a.._. ._... _�,i:��.�d'.,�.,!.� �_ ¢F,_t!:: .!!4.
i.r....i nr�.�.:�e� .._.,.. u.�.. ���....�:.�
��:-�hy '�-. ' ..a .�
1.,.p;a�,�.: . H':17hc+�l;:.: .J,!. r;�4;������";k�:ra 1 a.�_:I:.;'-:Ta:::�i5� - - v5' ": "1�, 7�4 i;�i;i�!
G��It�.W � �. �4. ..ai � :� , . n: I
r;�1:�Ip�W.,.� �.!a;�:•,I�,..m}�...�.dC�l.4..n;?t.,. ��h,� ,;��:��"�:''`rrvi�41�,.���ly h1iiAP.�i'.
. ,.., , :� � .., �.� .,,. .:.:_,. r ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .� t�,..� , :�,..
: ,., : ,.
. , � ,....r. . �. . _.. _�_��... . �.�. .... ... �„�.:�c,:r: :: � ..n. �: . : ..;, �,�� ii'., "I.�
�i�� �L�
M..�.x._�.� .. ���':�! �..�
�,.��.y':�,:,�i:Fl}�.�..�;.F� _._.9.._.� �;r, Ry." i�_�.�I��.::A,e� .i;..�tti�s,i i,i'���iiy;.i
, . . .�:.,..i„�:,m�g��
� � . ,l,i;7'..S�F�� �ii�� }: ` ` .ei!v� ...�,. 5 .CI �Iu��;,Ay' .
, .� : . .�.... „
94 :��, � ,�._ � .� , il��. '99 �� �' ' I � � 1997 Year .. . .,. .
� °ear:� 995: Year-��' ,�; 1'. f ;Year.�;� , _,. _
�..,,� . ;'. ; � .,, � ��
,;� :{,', ,' � ,� �,�ti6, ��.i ��{'i''�'�� f:.r, . •
t, ��� }1*. '2� ' ��f � it;_� �y��,.�1��'y�' ��� ! � S C:� : : �, •: � .' ! .i;
^ �n�i.�`t��'=,° r�iici��� f o'�:�i:`,�YN�?fiF�„q��'1,�.,�+` v�^iir'��:Zf(���j.ii�ki�; � � a}'�: �'�'r.itA .r
'��.�;;� �� �7,•��,aJ,� ;', iT'•�:i it�:if�..'.kql���rl:;; ni,if 1�f?�.i. •�s!': . �.r,� , , ' ., � .
t � i . . . � , . . .4• -'.3 .t� _,.'�k"� . a�i�.. . .�...r'+. . . . .i��; . . ..
�1�
Fl t Mix Summar
P Monthl ee
y
�� y
:� m
� 60 -- -------
0
lll " '
;�;,�:
W ����`
�I ';.;;,:
V— 40 — '` — — ' � — �'��i,
,;,'F li'.�!� '���ii4;
�.{ .if I'i',1�
_ it',
' r:i�
;i�
� `� ;;,
,:`,, ;,� ':;:; '.
i:.., �,..., '':5 ,���
2� — ' "� :, _
N f';� �
� � ; ���I���
' � , ,
2x, _
?3.�„ '
�_' "
' � 1,
- -- --- - i�,i�: '
_ _ T'
�: '�"'
�.
)� �
�.:
.f -
.s
r:� e :1.
j k
`.s� ., �.
. `M
�`::Y •.?ltvf:' S y - 3. ' .3
i'�•Yyr � � K..��r;.'�'•'>f�:;�ti�br� ��°,j,'`, R' _-
�`a; k �� `„ x :r. �`�� s .� _ - - -
�:. �+ : �' -
c • � h . � � � � . �
� ��.C�Y;e "��•� :+d: q �+� : 3'
�; +�a,j•S�u:y�::;w�3irsti(lyi .��t: 5 � .
, _ �F �l _i r' i: ``f' `'.� :eT�t :'?..i. �!iF 7�
- -, � --- -_- ;; ��`=-,pec�95 �� �Jaii=�4�::��:Feba`96 M.$�
.1` _ . _ `1 ___ - .::'E'�"d' � i �_ �?' � � �dk�.`li�n q�.:.:y ( �.t � _ ��.II� '�i :.il'1,
'.� ' ' _ ��:_ �.rv;: �.r"'+C�:{�.;` �:�:d1r� ��:,
� : �
� .�. : ;. =. '. �z,.
.�.� . .. :.. "' . .; J
' " ' I:yv:'=�;`:'s;;;; ;�iia�.F�.. r.:: �. , ` "'? _, },. :, i i'
-'_S:� i.L3.'.e'aR�:L:ir..;Y,,.. .�I:.L.1�': �:i�'I�.; i:i�yy��.!_:.i
! ' :�: ,
, .1' ':�':_:q .�1�;;., I a;1,i.s''���' �.i;:f.�.,i�,; �� !.`i
. . _ _r.'�_;:(�:- _ ' .`i.�? ., �' !`: � d �
;'i
,. - �,.a..._�'�i n,:�7:'°i ���i:i;ri;�;,,�r,�-p�,r; 'i`�ui�i�..
. .. :.r^�i.;., . ;�h.:s:;-ii�.'-;:::�:�
- _ � � _ .' .v.i : - .� "'A:!!':'.�
�. �.. . ., {..... .
i
� , �..�:
.r -$... ; �I��!1�
� . i` 4';` ` � 'i�.ir!�
. _ .;=�r:�;:;�K'• .,h�' �� �::':L'�;�:�
�. :� �_ : :�,
' = �u=�;,�r ;ii`�'� "r, , _ 6;��,_ :� � ; ait.
: �. � .
,� ; . .. !.:: �
, c . � : : ` :., .: � � _ �.. :e: y, �. . , , � � �, .
;
�.:::: a::..��,:,.�;_�;�a,,.���,::,,.,..::;��,:....�.._...:.:�
,
.�. - w..: ..... ..,.__,.: �... ..
_ � .... _ . r
.ble for the month of April 1996
0
r..�. � ..[. �4.�':�� ij�: �t�-�.•�..ii'f1'+�y..-^:rh: ��ti�l:(�:n-.�;
��� ���'�t ��1 � 1 �� , ^II��
;;;;,.,, ;�,: ;.;�� ,�
�:� ;�:;;: ,,, �
, . ,;,; ,: �.; �„ ;��, �
i; ; _ . � , _ ,: ,;. — — ' `'' — — — = — — —
.::;�i �:4�� ��::I� :�:��. _ "
� I;�.p.: :i::��i�
,;'''' ,�� �� �;�,.
�. ;G!I;� biF,;i� %b;i.
�raf: ;:.;:. �:�il�i: ° ' ��
� �ii� '��:C, '�'C:� �''ii� � :i::�i:� i:�;�!�
' i .:i�t ?'�Si?' :: I::� . o d�i .
2i:�::i�' .la�y ;��i.
if�i;p� :.��.:, .: .�: !:I:�i, ��i� ,
�`�6��r ;�i!4:'� �;p�i� �i �: , '�� n . .
'i' 1 ,'„ I,t' , �,.
!:;f,; �t Ii.... i:�:,;, t:,��
�!;�; �;;li' o:::., ';c'r;, -
,,;,�; '
i;:`. ;',;!,i,j j;:;! "��,; '�i�
�
-. : � i'.. � j�:i;:i �iy;:;i ', ��;I:i!
�:g' ,:�j: ;����.,
_ _ I;! - '�,;i;ii; - — — — --
� A:S �at: — ;;I;i��4 p.: ''r
::: c�i!'' �'�� ':r,:�
;� c:ii. :::;i:a
'" �' .,'I;�
� ='
- !E€:I�:: _
_;�':�: _ ' _ _ __ _ — '_
' _ ' ' ';�'i:�:. ' ' _ _ _ _ _
;y7' ' —
i:�`�; —
µ.-::;
�:. ' ,�r:;:�;
_ ��:_� _
:�::: _ . _ - - -
;:�, i;:
:�.. . _�.. .. . .. „
. �.:� . *��:yga:t ... ��,;i* ��P.F�:F•"_ .
Aug=96 Sep=96 Oct �6 Nov'`-96' Dec-96 Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr-97 May-97
, , _..
_ .:�.i'r„al. . . r
uvSi.'.�q�:.c.� � I .ic::�i.'_�t.e ' i'.
; iF.4;:i r:� �r=:,_;:: -`;':,r.:; °`�.:.;. l a�'; ��2' �5-:! nr - L
- :1„�il�i��+�:.:. '
g,
;� �...�: '�:�: li„�; .� !��i,a.�:l� � .i�i+ 1����.
�•nv
� i���Fyn�:. �a.� . '�'
� .�. �r � :�r, : i
�,
,,, ,.;,; ,:r;;�-, _�',:;;,:.,::.a,,a�'`�'�!i����,i4�;a �o;i.,.:,;i',;��:� .
,,.: ; ,,
�du:;:.s�t;'�.L:� ._ ��eio-a�r . � „�a�����..,.,: -
r � ti " � �i'. �' =�+ �„!.��:.
�:. � a:;::,e; _ .r. e
>tage 2-�_� �'= �Stage �3 ..., :�. � . �..: . .� .
� • ayr`�'ii t_id 1� t,. ' •` —
.� ..y.a; y�:�j" �'e"�'i�`:;;;r J�. c.:z• , ;
��A��a;,;s:����,��:;�S���R���a���'��;•�� .. . , . -� ' :;"�;«
����;1.�!_�TJ., �T���t:`���i1L.TTi�l�T�'�•�
m
�.r
,
.,P, I�rF ;s„a: .,. .�,,,r � •
�� ��i� �� 6������1' rrl als - All O eratlons
LL. �.�. �,a. � P A v
��� ,,,,�,���;��.�N����,���.����; ��,,�.. S
��i���i �I�������� �u��r�����d,� u�����.�,,,, �
�
i oo - ,.
�,�
;
� �
z 80 ! ;
O ,/
1= ,,-
� � ;
W 6� " j'
0. ;
O '
..Q '/,
O 40 -- �,p.
A
.'L _. - , '•�!'�
;� •;"���x ri7�}'r ' -- '.�- •' �,y — —
! h �� Y
V � n � �..' . = t�',.
�,���'�"°??���Qi�;r�n-� �1���i�
;�� - -_ .
- - �;
z- - _---
i.� .
w , ',,;: "
�:: ,.. .a:'�.: ..�. ._. . �.s..
ata unavailable for the month of April 1996
�
�
Over Eagan/Mendota Neights
Over Minneapolis
�. F � � ' ° � Over Bloomington
�
.,•Over St. Paul
•��' ,
���,�����E:�;�.'.�,Y4N ,. . ,� ` �._. .._.._._...._ ._. ... _ _ .._ . .
�R' x�rt..��.''tt;, �•�tj,�} a,.
��� 1 :J�:l� i:!�:L' i_:
. , A'pr,97;,'.,� ,
�
x, � . .�,•j�, 3yr::�,��nr- �p }� �. ,�p • .� . ,� � : • J �i.4; � . .
♦ * r�,• (�. .t:� 'k � �p�:r •lai rI��T{. 7;�p r ^�� '�i�"iL ������' s r�`I' 7��•
se• ae lP.���Q �m .�� � � '^� .-�.���: y' i.}�d•F .J�l, 1�%c.1� .9'• Pt!i��.�� +j'� ,�.d�•i'.'ni��"�:;''b 4!� . :i �'1;' ��Y,2.y;!; ��'�;'Y�j�i
.ifif., •;V1, i f., J i '. i ,j�. I,..
���' ;,ny:. ''s- ,. !� �; �;id'+�lu' S rS,� ,��\. .� �- �tt�i��;i,�,lxly. ` 1• F;' �d-i7T'. f i77i, a �t �.„ • IN, :': .;;'�k!+f�:. s. � i� �`, � �'� •��v �.,Y j
' � � .: , � , 6. � .S { ���.:�� �: }`�.ti� �C..• 1.� ly•�. k�y�, S: ,} � i:.� '� ..r, •' �' f I.' � �
�'1 . ..� .. ' ���': �, .fl ,ti n ( ��{�'� tt'��o i�� � rl• .r ,�. • d�;. �� 5 �
�^ 1,•: lRi��� ' '��}j ?� i ��' � ��� .. !!� ={"�' ' • !!: uR!�l�7tT ��lt!!.1!
�u :r. i�..�^
.q.5 w�
�����N���� �� ���� artures - All O erations
�� , ���� . S P D e
����I i" i� ��,, �
���,������ ��,��,�,�N.��,��.�� p
unavailable for the month of April 1996
�
100 �
; -�'
.�
. , _ ---
cn � ,
0 so
�
� ,.
W 60 -
O _ /
J '
• �,a„ 40 - --.W
„��M���
- - • I_/._rs��l -- — -- ---.--
;;, .,.; .
, ' ,-'.
JI' 'i�
i � �4, �
2''
_ Over Eagan/Mendota Heights
, Over Minneapolis
�������'.
Over Bloomington
,,,� �.
; Over St. Paul
.�:'.�uuiL: �.:.L �...• ....... _.... ...._� . �. � v.� _ _
. '2"J��r_L� ..
MSP arri r '
C e
Jet Arr�val
s
i6i ��� �,a. . , .:. .
,
;
,
ioo "
;�
� �
� so — ; � "
� ,.
,
� . ,
W 60 -- /
O �
_ / .
l
J �
� 40 =
O �'4�:
�i'7.._ __,t ...� _. '.�L•ttittii:!
unavailable for the month of April 1996
Over Eagan/Mendota Heights
Over Minneapolis
� ,� �" � , ,,, ,��� ,,� � �� 6���� Over Bloomington
,�.� Over St. Paul � ' -
yy ,.I . � �a� � �q a' '+ CJ,�'5� 7'?�T'GA Brl� �'i.�yk �� p?i • r � ; J,',� I I • {'
;Iw �, � f+���' ��I��'-�4 '�+� +:}i I:.x .4' ry', ��lib�� �i�� ��, ��� � 1hr �'IF� Ifh��`'t ' �.
� '� T mNy � � r , �'Y ., a,:��,,�'M "" ,s_�'u� , �12� iih '°�`,h+. r �' , f?i� ij'�i4J1,�j�',., : � i '._�.,, + ,� f:. c , - -
6:�.�����A'ue=96�+ ��.��. Oct-9���r��'�Dec-96��,iw�Reh:9T:��F���'n.d�Anr;9'7.!ik,��'�;�a�'�.i:;��,��._.__.�.� �,�.__�.._.,.._�._�__,�_:�T.�L��.._.. .� ,
�
�
L
100 —
/ /:
(A j ` �
O 80 —
f— �
� ;�
W 60 =
O �
_ ;
J %
Q 40 � ,
.O '•��,
��a� .,.�.
,., ,,; �
F' � — ,. . �
� 1 � ,. _ .� � ���is:�u
SP Carrier Jet De art r
p u es
unavailable for the month of Anril 1996
�
Over Eagan/Mendota Heights
� � ry��g� �� . n �� � N .
�H��I� ��� - � u . Over Minneapolis
i!��� '� w� N';�.�„ �„ N,• ;���'. p�'M;eiih;Vl�r�a,"' ���, � ,d
� � ,� . �� �� � Over Bloomington
� . , _ .� -.,.
�:r':�' {_` ..
,�:�Over St. Paul
, .. ...: . . ... . .. h.��;a „ �n ; o" . ��p ^: ,�q "' i� T' �Sb r•; �.p, .�E .�,,,r� e„r - .�, :,:dh ��,,� i.
� f. �Nr;Ki �; �6:i � "�. 3 ur ' -
�� f, ��ePN :"f; � F ;l i 'r.�.: �`�: ,I� R:a.Y., '�iS�r�� Ci&!�' Jx,,�1, .�^�'iPtts;,,.„° •;;��;q,.r�;,;; t•:
i . , ,�t'�t i. �� �,�1rA,. �+., �.3, �yG .�:rJc� +� , i 1�1� .� .�: �y�i .�hb�, ��' ..E;,� ,
� -i,�, �ir � ��I �� � ��� b� ;��r. �::-,
�_ �,�dkr.; iLWL� C'90'��`h-•`'r�une-Q d�f � �' S� y.�Ct'%�6����.in��;i.b�. '!y�'t .�9''.:L"I.u.i.,a.. ,.iu:lp�.iyc:u;�_��_� .�. __... w.=_..__..�...-" '-.. _. .�..
�.,•r; i ::�,Li S , P ;. !:., 6��� ,.I�•":��':'r ;j` =i: �:;?.': � �?'�;5,.9�����;�, ,,E �' �.��„�,.,f .�P r..:�, � � � .
� .,, . �,'f
. . ,:,,
, ., , �
''�, � �� .• .. , r • ...,...i�, J r � �� ;.�;: ..'. •:
;.. ��� �'�' ���..�,� ,. .. ' 96_ � 'Jan-9�'#%'3� Mar"-'97.,:'��. +Mav-97� '
�9 ov- �r" , �� �r�,. •_ "��•.`
�
M P Ni ht im Arri als
g e v
erati n
p os
unavailable for the month of April 1996
;. ,� �
� oo - , '" A
,�
cn �,
O80 , ,',
f-- _ �;
,
� ,� ,
w 60 = /,
o.
O
� ;,
. a 40 �'�
�--- „�
0
— Y�: "e�+�'>s �"" -- :,:, ,,• ..� ' - - - -
—�.;.��'�.., V->'_ ��:.�
4�: �T.��.�,-,i L
��r r��,i.{.+��•i�.i �4 fy�y� � �!
�a'�i.N�p�`�i�i{�'�;�0 �P �oE� •�����P��� ����I�I.�'���4i��up�
�r� . +,sw:' :.\a: a»+`c��,�.��� ��:�+'� �'�iupa,;�4! �h��� � �a
- " O ' _!+-:t;._ �ai;•: ' .i�k�
r:_t : � - -a�
_ ;;. ;:
. ,
.. :. =;'=:
' = O�=i::�;�,;.;,:a;�;k?:k�;:;:5ci•, �5r.�;£s%,;aY;r�':s°.:+:��.I
i „ . c _ ;.�'��: -�s'"��
. �_ .�..,_ . ,_..��� Dec-95=��:�=:�Fe6=9fi-��;�'��;A r=96
- , ' ' - • - p�
se. � a e lite'P�ograms r,��;;�,:r�.i;�: �: �,y;��s,�;i'�`��p:'#TMr��;;.:�
• : �_ � � • - ! : ^ �t , i, ., ... ls': ��:,, ' � �� . ,
�'�'!�� : ,!�l�f�9, I fIPT�11 � � �'!�' ��^ �
�Nov-96 ' � �
' Over Eagan/Mendota Heights
- - - ,�����Ii��°', — - - - - - --- -- -- - --- --- —
' � �a� Over Minneapolis
��dl��h r
, Over Bloomington
:,Over St. Paul
�y }1' ��Biy%.p �"yi y��41������;��r�•,.
��e_ 5y �C�Ji' i t:�I, e� ��y i i �i� �'1,� ,L�,n, �,,.,. .t . r.'1,.
SA' y l�Fyl�l��� L: !h.'1�1:1::'i�i.'�':t u�_::i:`�i1. �vF.
;,97,:..,�, �A'pr=97:y;; _ _. ,. .._,�. ._ ._ _. ' _, ._.
Z' x, ,:i•� R �
7 �;�::� Mar-97 • ''May-97
r:}'j•�;� r.I• •-�
�ti�}..�,�'4�i�.'}Ai3�� �%J.44: � �t . � �. ,r:^; �,�5�,•�5'.d:�� �. ^q.' �• i .��6 't
t. ,e:��• ��(,. t.� . �ii• � � ._iyal ,A • .�1�� ''<
�!SS.�',5,..,P_R'7�_..'...!!L�lLL� :-��.....���l�_�:T'i� _ ..!!!�.'!!T .
i �
.�C�� �
�P
��
h�
t��r�e D
� e artur
p es
: ��
.'
eratl
p ons
unavailable for the month of April 1996
—��!�:�At._�—'.--' - — -
m
. . . h.,�,.�� •i:.4V 4 p- '�' E _. ..� _ ' _ -- "{
;t";;�;°�,��c:=� � �,�;�`� S� s� �-,y I�' � -Over- Eagan/Mendota Hei hts - - - —
�=,�.a�-t��.ak � ��;E�:..:�:� :��...'. � ' in �
9 - :,�` ''",,`M.�; � ��� Over Minneapolis
- -�;: . �o ;�, �'`�'.;;- �s:.; W�-.: w .
. o . �..:. :,�:?,;:., . 1 r ,rriil�lb
� ' ¢;_ :�.,�v.3.rc: zv «:�: «v _ y.� ,� �y�f�.1k
. . �..I,i�i� rv -a. :� : 4.'�'+�,
'#.���..,. :;�:r° '��"'-° J;i'f:t" �p'
; � ::�i,��.
`;`?, : ;;,;�,,� QverBlaomington
_. .;�;t !`:''' ;;"r,:''i: .a'�'�•` t � . "
, � . = Y.: '
. . . ... , ,..;
. y�� t. , �: :<� :
� �. t� ,"���-.:'` O
,- i.�
� � �.:cr��.i:�i�:��_'��v..:��e� m:� - c� x . t
' .. . -•,c,s .. ,.... .. .
� .. . ... . � "
� �, .Ms,�,'� i�`r•',�.w*,i� Rj'�zr�s . �i::-•}� y-,, y�'�.. _ f, ,��"'``�.^`�,: �L�� a:�
.. _..
'
��, .. . �, ,�,.,��s.� .. �,;y .�{ ���:{ v�,s� �„ ,.-. �r .. _ , _ �R;
De ' " ' ""�' " - - 4 _ - - -
� ' �
• ':e• ,.. ,,, .• ,,:,, n..),i w�,�{ tf , ,,.t, f: x� � ;p ,'ry,� '�� � ;..
,i' ` �,c�,� ,�t°��"'syT•4�f)�r�S �'ii�k �.�n �- k s�4. apSi,wX7.�� 1 . ;�v.,;_�.si�.. �...�_,......�..i.t.�...f:a�ari".._�.._.. � �'t:
.
� .c•. r -,_• e-96'h' 9 �• G f;�i;Dec� , � �p'�i�:�"w �;;�, ,�,:
,.. � ���''.: , '��"�b,i��� �"�i�i� r-97,��,�f�.,; _ '�
. . .r.
, : ,.
.
' "., .u�1 En. .:, . a. .. c .�� 5 • • � • •
r
0
�
�
100 _ �,,..
:�
,
_ /,.
�
80 _ .
F- 40 :
C� '
� ��
:.� .:,:.�� �.
L�,.�� ° �`;' .
�',;_ �. i j j 11 �, �, � .
��'�
�� f� � ���, !�.h.qM 't'.f ,,,.���, , �, ��r�nR � n„H.,ri�4fa � ��
� ' J
e� .
-�'-�'I
unavai �'�
lab�e �4r �he
month of�prl�, �
'----- 99F
Over Ea
-�--_."_`-__g- �
4ver 11�inn�a�olis
�Yer $lootnington
- �.,
C'i b_'_ : y_�_ .. ...
►ghts _
�"'�„�.u'� ,�; y;�i�a �r �� � �
�,.� h'•r�� � ° ��, r � •
G,;.,, , t�1
�`
:�,,. ��� (�'
:.,, a�'�1�1�'
� ����.�. J
���� �t D
��;,�, .�,, ,�7 ,�,�,,, �' :" � ���
�'��1�`�'"��� ,. ; �,�;,,�; � � � ��
ilable for �he .rnon�h of
A.prll 199(,
ao
, / --=---_=_._.� - -
4ver Eaga�endata
-- - -- - Heights
Over Minneapo�is --
, 4ver Bloomington
i' r: x :.
:er St. Paut '
,� . . _ ..._._. .�. ....�. �_ .,.�_ ,.� `.
_ �Y-97 �:�::�.
�
��U��;::�:' ��\?:r �: �./j�i�,��l•': •�.
? � , e.;��;.
',N `�hi': ''�.,C w•�r�:. � � `'r,f '''A �l:d :
�.,::\ i,, T';'�1';. \`. . J� •�.i;. •��, je.: nf,��,l
\\ �i ����� �. �4 1 ���' �ii
`,� � � i §� �I �11
\,�`� `�,\��� � .�,.� . !, .��',�;1�i,i
:I�ii, �,`.It��..'.i'' ����/•�j,►;:.
`� �� . ��; '?►; : :,:�.. . 1' a n. !1
ii���". ..... ' : �!�'���' • � �;' � �/ I
.y=. :�;0:�.�,ti�y �. ; , �''r.. '%�,ti
'-' . ',.,� I
•` :%=, '; . `• '! ��, ' ,�Ri.,��1 ji
,•.�`��.:��;5' � �[ � � i •,{ •.1� j o.�.,
�'1� "; �. ..� � �.. ';�, e :f �hr��
�w ��\'';;: • :,. �,. � ' ,r ." '; +j4/;%
`,�; �s .1� ..� ✓' t
;��.,
�:.:,;�'��,�; ...:d:,:,;�:�,
►:��`.!\ �ii; s • ,l�'� � � �y �ir
j� .�� � ; 1 . . %? '! ; ' .. i'r /��A7�'.
;�� •'h7i. : •. �' ; n. �� .'�.
��i1.�,' y�i�• , � . '�;I`°•? � r,.
��;.; �• , '�'_��;�� ;,:�'-.:.
� %;f� :, '''; � '�;;:;�;c"%
/d� • ''/r`�j�y?�/,/,
„ � 1 . - �,/%i.I. " ,
' ... . ��I"�����Ii
� _ . �'- ``�` _` ;� v\
� _ . .\ - � ._ '.
/�i/,•�'''//�'�'/' '. ' .
/� ��f � ���' ��
�/��/'►ii.y � . ;;.,.:
�� �����/�;`� ��` ,
i-��i�� % =:�= ' =�. �,:- .
_ �. // / .. �' •.�y,:.�� ..
���'w/��///� ',/�!� ���%� ' : �'-
i%I � � .- . � i/ / �i ;•
�j�% _� . �� / / �� i - � , �..1r:.
�% �/� �/ f i % i �/ /;i �
� /j .c� j � � � i.:� � %;; � ��
•�% �/i /.i.:� � .�i .!� , f ��'�
/!1;' :, �/= %,r�: . %%�� �,
� / '' �"v. .. -. . ' � % • �%/,-: r✓ �%%�.%.�
i i ��l• . % . %,.�� �
ii•�'. . jrl� - ..iLi :��%;%�`I�'�
��/' i/i:�.i�i/��� �r'�.
! .--: � is � :=� �� �-%�!� a
�� � ,,� .� � '��•�' � %.; i r /'� d
s /��!,%•� ii
.�_ , .- �+:-%;�... /''��✓,L.� i:�/�4,
• ' �`� � \ ` h
. • � c�,� ` ;,,. j:
, , . • ,, ,;\\ �,
. •, • . •.��
, � `,`. i.'\�8 �
.. ` `i ' . �: � � :�
. � � � ; . � �' � '.; ` ., � � �
� ��
�'t � ' ' „ '1�' 1`� �` � . \\` � ;
' �>,}�•`;� � �.
, � • :��\ � :� t
� ��� � i1 . � �L 9 ♦ �"?.
r� •+`�� N � e ��►�. '�
. �' \ �,��������
•A� � � �� �` , i \ �� \\\\ ( ��.
� f' �,'� � 1 �F� � � ` ,\ \,,� i ���, axa �
I�d��S�.'. , � 1 �: �D. ��F,.?e�.�.'.\'
Metropoiitan Airparrs Commission
Proposed North Boundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis i��:
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
May 1997
0.8% (17) Carrier Jet Departures North of Proposed U95° (M)
Corridor Polzcy Boundary �
Page 2 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
,"�Ietropoi
�
`• Minneapolis - St. Paui International Airpori
May 1997 ,
2n77 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departur�
I� ... Carrier Jet Departures (Q,��%} �
North of Proposed U95° {M) Corridor Poliey Bounc
�
�
O
O
....� �
�..�_. � ^'"'>
16 TRA�KS �R4SSED P-GATE !�
k
LEFT COUNT�O (0.0�) RIGNT COUNT=16 (100.0��)
_ . -- �
i
* I
-------------------•---- --•----------------------- -------------•------------ -•----------- � ----i
� I
.
. {. �
---^-----"----_...----+ .'------�'------"------ ----,_.---^_.--------'---�_.-------� s-y-�-�I
. � #�I
•
Airports Commission
Page 3
Metropolitan Airpor[s Commission •
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport
May 1997
�
2077 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
1... �arrier Jet Departure • Early T�urnaut (Q.0%Q
�North Side Before Three Miles)
1 TRACKS CROSSED P—GATE
LrFT COUNT=O �O.Q�) RIGHi COUNi=1 (100.0�)
�E
. �
i � t
J�� -2��Q � ��1�',u �-'Uvv
DEv�AT�4N ��O+a U�ti1ER C�� GA�� i��i
P�ge 4 Aviation t�Iaise & Sateilice Pragrarrts
, Metropc�lita�� Airports Commission
��
Sauthern Boundary Corridor Gate Penetratian Analysis
�
Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airpart i
May 1997 ;
,
. ,
�
i
1U.9% (227) Carrier Jet Departures ;
South of Corridor (Sauth of 29L Localizer) ;
. �
4� � � C� � ,
�� �
`
0
�
�
9 Q
\ a
a ��
�?
��
�.
�
0
Metropolitan Airports Commission
�
Minneapolis - St, Paul Internatianal Airport
May 1997
2077 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
222 ... Carrier Jet Degartures (1 .7%a
South af Carridor {South af 29L Localizer}
222
�, LEFT COUNT=222
�
TRAGKS CR4SSED P-GATE
(100.0�) RIGHT COUNT=O (0.07)
�
�
. .
; •
.
�' ------------�-« --- � ----- - -------------- ---•------_... __..---------- ---------------
� -� .� �- - -
� 1 ;
;..
.,
. ;� . .
� ,;
*:, .� .
�. . •
•� r� •• r
�M�s•
� � • �� �
.�.�. ----'-----��-�-� � �� �-�-� -�- -'_.------ ---------------- ----'------------ --------...-----
� �•r� �r� �,� � � .
•�
��� • � • �
s '�1i +
� • '. •
0
•
� _..-•-----...---T-------�---------;• -----•-------- - -------------- - -------------- - ---------------
c^„
0
� -----------------z-----------------?- -----•-------- -----•------•••-------•---------- -- •------•-------
-�U�� -4'QQ� -
�
n n r t,
'vtiv Gti�7t1
oft�����o� }�a� c����� o� cAT� ;{�)
Page 6 , Aviation Noise & Sate}Iite Programs
�
� MetroF
�. � Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airpo
May 1997 .
2077 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departur�
5... Carrier Jet Depactures - Early 1�rnout (.2 �
(South Side Before Three Miles) �
S TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �
o �tFT COUNT=S (100.0�) RIGHT COUNT=O (0.0%),
0
o �
;
;
�
i
�
i
i
�
o �
. , . , ,
.: ; ; ; ; ,
� -----------------�-----------------,-----------------�------------------�-----------------=-
----------------
o ,
� ,
�
I
,. . I
. I
A �
' f
O
O �
� � �
� � � � ,
Q'-'--'-'-"----' ---'----------'-'�-'-'-----------"?' ""------"" -'-'---"""--'--- "'--"'._ I. .-'
I
I
�
I
O�
O
O-'-"-'-"""" "-""""""' ' "-'---"""' "--"""--'-- """"""" - --"""-' -� "
�
I�
. � I
� • � �
I � �
( � , � . � �i
-oO�G -4000 -
Airports Commission
�Uilv IIbUCU
GEVIATiON �RJM CtNTER 0� GArE (�l;
<
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs II PaQe 7
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Southern $oundary Corridor �ate Penetration Analysis
Minneapolis - St. Paul Internatianal Airport
May 1997
1.9% {39) Carrier Jet Departures 5° Sout�h af Corridor
(S° South of 29L Localizer}
Metropaiiltan Airpc�rts Commission
I
�t Minneapolis - St. Paul Internationai Airpor�
�
May 1997 �
. �
2077 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departuri
34 ,.. Carrier Jet Depariures (1.6 %
5° South of Corridor {5° South of 29L Localizer
I
�
34 iRACKS CROSSED P—GATE i
o L�� i COUNT-34 � i00,0%} RIGHT COUNi=O (0.0%1
0
o �
�
. �
. a
a i
o-----------------= --------------- - -------------- -------------- ----------------- ----------� -----
. ± � ; • �
i • I
•� • � (
� � r
� "".""'"'."""� � +"" '� ' ""'".."""""�' """.""."' ' '.."""""."' """.."" "'
+ � t �
, � �
K
I
O � • �
O ♦
0 '-'---"'-'-"'-'r'--""-"-"'-"T- '-"'-"'-""' "-'..'-'..'-"-" --'•'--.'--..'--""i""""'-' -"'-....��.
I
c'V I
�
I I
1
�
O �
� __�__`.��_..����_�1.�__..�_..�_...�_..3_ �_���_�����"�_ _"�_':_���_�� __ ��_���_�•__"__���__����'_ �.���
� �
. � � { l
� . . ; ;
-s��o -4000 -
0
DEVlAT14N FRQM CEN I ER OE GAT� ;� 1}
U�
Aviation Naise & Sa[ellite Pro=rams �I Pase 9
Metropolitan Airparts Commission
N�inneapalis - St. Paul Internaiianal Airpart
May 1997
2477 ... Total 11.L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures
S ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early 'i�rnaut ( .3 °�o }
(South Side Before Three Miles)
� IKACKS GKOSSEU I'-GAIE
! Er T Ct�UN i=5 (100.0�) RCGHT COUNT-O �0.0%�
: � ' : ' s
—o�u i -�C�Q -LJl;ii C 200G 4C00 6Cr0
�EVIAiI�� ; �U4f Ct�i1�� QE GATE ,���
Page l0 Aviatian Naise & Sateilite Programs
't
� � �
Az ar� ,�1�o�.se .Re or�
. - �i� �
A biweekiy update on litigation, regulations, and technalogical
Volume 9, Number 10
Blue Grass
RUNWAY FOES ASK CEQ T4 REVIEW
EIS �QNTRACTQR S�LECTIO�T PRt�CESS
Opponents of a proQosed new runway at Blue Grass Airport in Lexingtan, KY,
have asked the Cauncit an Environmental Quality to review the Federal Aviatian
Administration's process for selecting a contractor to prepaze an Environmental
Imgact Statement on the projeci, contending that the process is fundamentaliy
flawed and fails ta ensure a fair environmental review.
They contend that the contraciar selection grocess at Blue Grass Airport was
incqnsistent with a court of appeals interpretation of CEQ regulations and FAA.
orders and guidelines as reqniring the FAA to be the "sole" selectar of the contrac-
tor.
Each of the three consultant teams on the airport's short list submitted to the
FAA inciuded subcontractors with an apgareni "financial or other interest zn the
outcome of the project," which, under CEQ and FAA, regulations is disqualifying,
Gregory S. Waiden af the Washingcon, DC, Iaw fum Meyer, Brown & Plati,
which represents Bluegrass �asrn•Fayette County, Ltd., a horse f�rm that would be
impacied by noise from the new runway, toid Dinah Bear, general counsel of the
CEQ in recent carrespondence. Walden is a fotmer chief counse2 of the FAA.
(Cantinued on p, 7$}
lYatirrnul Parks
!'�1! '� '1 �'1 ' ' •
� • • • 1 1 1 "• ' � '
A nine-member National Parks 4verfiights Working Graup, camprised of
representatives of the aviation industry and environmental b oups hand-picked by
the secretaries of Transpartatian and the Interiar, has begun work to develop a
recammended notice of progosed rulemaking which wilI define a process for
reducing or preventing the adverse naise impacts and other effects of commercial
air tour operations over nationat parks.
Given only 100 days to complete their assignment, the working � oup's recorn-
mendatians are due in early September, evidence of ihe Clinton Administration's
eagerness to issue re;ulations to address the park overflight problem.
Under pressure fram environmentat grougs ta limii air tours aver nationaI parks,
President Clinton in a 1996 Earth Day speech directed the Secretary of Transporta-
tion in consultation with the Natianal Park Service to issue a naace of pragosed
rulezn,aking for "the management of sightseeing aircraft in those NadonaI Parks
where it is deemed necessary to reduce or prevent the adverse effects of such
aircraft."
The recently-formed overflights working o oup has already met two dmes, on
May 20-2I and June I 1-13, in Washington, DC, and plans to meet on July $-9 in
(Continued on p. ?9)
Copyright C� 1997 by Airport Noise Report, Ashbvm. Va. 22011
��
June 23, ] 997
In This Issue. , .
Blue Grass ... Qpponents
of a proposed new runway
ask the Council an Environ-
znental Quality to review the
FAA`s process for selecting a
contractor ta �do the EIS.
They canten� the FAA
process fails� to ensure a fair
environmental review - p. 7"7
Parks ... A warking group
is in the pracess of trying to
develop a no�ice of praposed
nilemaking on limiting air
rour aperatians �ver natior�al
parks - p. 7� �
Burbank .�.. The airport
gets possession of the land it
needs to expand but is baned
from doing ,anythang wzth it
but cieaning lt up - g. 80
Legrslatian ... EPA would
be put back in the driver's
seat on fede'ral noise matters
under bili introduced by N3
Sen. Torricelili - p. 80
RDtl ... Airgort expiains
why it chose�55 dB DNL
boundary fo i noise eYpasure
notices - p. 8:1
FI�AN . . � i Groags affer
research recommendations at
pubIic hear�ng - p. 82
Part l50 Program ...
FAA approves programs for
Boise, Spririgfield - p. 83
News Briefs ... - p. $4
'7$ Airport Naise Report
Blue Grass, from p. �77
He told the CEQ that he objects to several aspects of the
FAA's canduct of the EIS contractor selection process at
Blue Grass. First, he said, the FAA's practice of cedin= to
the airport the authoriry to pre-select a short list at' consult-
ants from which the FAA must make its choice contravenes
the CEQ requirement that the FAA "solely" select the
contractor.
In Citizens Against Burtington, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that, once the
FAA decides not to prepare an environmental iinpact
statemenc directly, it is obli�ed to pick a contractor itself and
not to deiegate that respansibiiity to the airpon, Walden
said.
He alsa criticized the FAA's practice of only reviewing
disclosure statements submitted by conuactors after they
have been selected to conduct an EIS instead af beforehand.
`"The only reading of CEQ guidelines that serves the
purposes of NEPA is that the FAA`s review of disclosure
statements submitted by contsactars must precede, not
follow, the selection of a contractor and the conclusion af
the scapina gracess: '
And Walden asserted that the FAA's disclosure form
pravided to contractars "is clearly inadequate" to identify
confIicts of interest. "`The question of whettter a cantractor
plans to seek future projects `prior to completion of the BTS'
witI not capture any ptans or intentian to seek future
business after the completion of the EIS;' Walden told the
CEQ. "The FAA cannat satisfy itseif that a cantractar does
not have a`financial or other interest in ths outcome of the
project' unless it can canciude that there is no reasanabie
expectation that the contractar will be retained by the airport
to wark on the groject following completian of the EIS,'" he
said.
Pracess Shauid Begin Again
Noting that a CEQ review of FAA's contractor selection
process couid reguire a substantial invesunent af time and
resources, Walden asked the CEQ to request the FAr�. ta
refrain from proceeding with the Blue Grass EIS uncil such
review is completed. He also asked the CEQ to advise the
FAA to be�in anew the cantractar seiectian process for the
Blue Grass EIS.
The CEQ has not officially responded yet to Walden's
request. He met recently with CEQ ofFicials an the matter,
but declined to discuss what happened at that meetinQ.
The attorney toid ANR he does not know haw widespread
the con#7icts af interes[ he has identified with the consultants
involved in th� Blue Grass EIS are. He has confined his
review to only Blue Grass Airport.
But he told the CEQ that the FAA's conduct at Blue
Grass, to date, "has abjectiy faiied ta ensure a fair and
disinterested environmental review as contemplated by
NEPA and CEQ resuiations and �uidance." %ie urged the
CEQ to review the situation at Blue Grass Airport because
"the inte�riry of the EIS contractor selection process and the
objectivity of an EIS are central to the purposes" of NEPA.
The issues raised in the Biue Gr�ss c�se are also likely to
arise in other asencies and thus further guidance from the
CEQ ta federal aaencies may be necessary," he told Bear.
Walden turned ro the CEQ after unsuccessful]y attemptin�
ta resolve the issue with the F�A..
Blae Grass Airport officials defended their action,
contending they have simpiy foltowed the process defined
by the FAA. Donald Sexton, director of operations for the
airport, told ANR that airpon ofFicials met with the FAA
prior to soiicitinD proposa3s far the EIS and went over the
agency's Quidelines for the contractor selection process.
"Those auide]ines were followed," he said.
Sexzon said that, as far as he knew, the process used at
Btue Grass Airport was similar ta that used at other airports.
Blue Grass Airpqrt received solicitatipns from seven
contractors to gerform the EIS on its groposed new runway.
It selected three contzactors from that list of seven and
presented them to the FAA, which ranked them in order of
its preference.
Landrum & Brown was the FAA's first choice to perform
the EIS, foilowed by Greiner, Ine., and HNTBI{1�uest. Each
of these three main consultants, in turn, assembled teams of
subcontractars ta help prepare the IIS.
Walden's initial abjections were with three of the subcon-
tractars on the Landrum & Brown team, but Landrum &
Brown recentiy drapped out of the EIS groject because it
could not reach agreement with the airport on the cost af the
EIS.
The subcontractars on the Landrum & Brown team to
which Walden objected were:
• Newton & Associates, which WaIden toId the CEQ "has
a lon�-standing and ongoing financial relationship with the
airpot�t." Newton & Associates dropped aff of the Landrum
& Brown team last October and recently dropped off af the
Greiner team as weli;
• Kimley-Horn and Associates, which Walden said the
airport retained in I994 ta provide maintenance and repair
work on the runway, A review of Kimley-Horn's disclosure
statement revealed that the campany is cnrrentty under
contract with the airport to provide carao marketing support,
although the company said is currendy is not actively
working to that end.
Walden told the CEQ that "there is every reason to believe
tiiat the airport wauld `reactivate' this cantract if the 9,400
foot runway project were approved by the FAA following
the EIS becnuse the airport has justified a 9,400 faot runway
on the expectation that it would atoract cargo operatians."
• GRW Engineers, Inc., which Walder► said also has a
long-standing re}acianship with the airgort. Landrum &
Brown noted that GRW has done the planning and design
far mnch of the aviation -related facilities at the airport
since 1970. Walden told the CEQ that "there is every reason
to expect that tile airpart wiil turn ta GRW to work on its
expansion project if approved fallowing the EIS."
Since Landrum & Brown is now aut of the running for tl�e
AirpoR Noise Report
3une
7497
EIS project, the airport has turned ta the FAA's second
choice on its list: Greiner, Inc. But Walden aiso raised
objections to members of the Greiner team, includin�:
� Newtan & Associates;
• PDR En�ineers, which prepared a June 1995 Master
Plan Update that Walden contends is "seriousiy flawed,"
and which has done ather work for the airport board over
the years;
• Mr. Bitiy J. Lanaley, manaaer of Greiner's Memphis
Branch, who previously served as mana�er of the FAA's
Memphis Airports Disuict 4ffice and therefare wouid have
been substanually involved with the Blue Grass Azrport's
quest for another air carrier runway, Walden told CEQ.
The FAA infarmed Walden on lune 12 that Newtan &
Associates has dropQed off of the Greiner team; that Bi11
Lan�ley withdrew from the team "far personal reasons,"
and that PDR Engineers remains on the tearn.�
Farks , from p. 7�
Washingtan, DC, and on Aug. 4-5 in Denver.
The workina b oup has been able to quickly reach
consensus on severai broad issues related to the air tour ''
problem, but the July meeting is expected to be pivotaI
because it will be at that point that it will become evident
whether aa eement can be reached on same of the more
thomy issues the working b aup must address.
The tnast difficult issue for the b onp wi3l be how to come
up with a way ta determine when air tours will be allowed
over parks and when they will na� The working grc�up must
develop criteria and procedures that can be used ta make
such determinations. Crucial to develoging such criteria aze
answers to the still unresolved issues of wha controis the air
space over the parks (the FAA or the Park Service) and how
exactIy to define the term "natural quiet" and to determine
when and where is it crucial to have natural quiet.
The aviation industry regresentatives on ihe warking
group are expected to dig their heels in on the matter of who
cpntrols the air space aver national parks. 'I'lsey fear that if
the FAA loses control of some air Space, the system wi11 be
fractured and coutd become unsafe.
The working o oup members a�reed at the autset not to
talk to the press, but Steve Bassett, president of xhe US Air
Taur Assaciatzon, toid ANR chat he has been an abserver at
the first two meetings and is "cautiously optimistic" abaut
the process underway ta devetog a proposed NPRM. "Each
side recagnizes the right of the other side to exist," he said.
Bnt until BasseFt attended the workin� � oup meetin�s he
was very skepticai of what wouid occur. In a mid-May press
release, the US Air Tour Associatian accused the Depart-
ment af Interiar and the Park Service oi "re;uiatory
manipulation," and strongly objected to the structure and
objectives of the warkina � oup set up under the FAA's
Aviadon Rulemaking Advisary Cammittee (ARAC).
The association, which regresents a�r taur operators and
79
associated companies throu�hout the�United States. accused
the Clinton Administration of "setun� up" the air tour
industry and char�ed the Park Service with deiiberateiy
manipulatinQ the structure and scope �of the workin� �caup
to skew the final resuits in favor of mare regulation of air
tour aperators nt national parks and more control of the air
tour industry by federai land managers.
Although Bassett is pleasantly surpC ised with the conduct
of the warking aroup thus far, he still stands by his earlier
press release which said that "the air �tour industry is beinQ
set up by this administratian to ensure that onerous new
resvictions on air tour flights at natiainal parks wiil be the
final result." G
Airport Nois
Working Group
'i'tTe members af the workina �roup are Andrew V.
Cebula, vice president of the National Air Transport
Associaiion; Tam Chapman, vice pr'esident for gavernment
affairs of the Aircraft Owners and Pilou Association; David
1. Chevalier, president and �eneral manager of Blue
Hawaiian Helicopters; Chip Dennerlein, regional director of
the National Parks and Conservatian�Association; Boyd
Evison, a farmer natianai park snperintendent and regional
director now retired; James Host, chief executive o�cer of
the Nationai Tour Associatian; CharIes Maynard, executive
director of the Friends of Great Smokey Mountains National
Park; Alan Steghen, gresident of Twin Otter Intematianal;
and Richard Deertrack of Deertrack & Associates, wha
represents the interests of Native Americans.
The working o oup will submit its final repart ta the
Natianal Pazk Service Advisory Baard and the FAA
Aviatzan Rutemaldng Advisary Committee. These grougs
will then forward capies to their res�ective agencies. The
NPS Advisary Board and ARAC wiil make subsequent
recommendations ta a Senior Interagency Working Group
set up by both degartmentx to coord�nate the development of
the proposal.
p NPRM is expected out by the end af the year, with a
final ruie in place by next summer, zf — and that cauld be a
big if— ihe working a oup can reacli consensus on a
propasal. � �
The task statement for the work�ng o aup sets the fqllow-
in� expectations far the progosed NPRM ttte working �roup
is being asked to develop: ��
• That it be "pracess oriented and � pplicable ta any unit of
the natianal park system where commercial sightseeing air
tour operatians are identified as hav�ing or potentially having
adverse effects on park resources or the visitor experience";
• That is "be designed to faci]itate prablem preventian at
garks where a groblem does not yet exist";
• That it "be desi�ned to resolve conflicts at ar mitigate
adverse effects to those gark units where commercial air
tour aperations are having adverse effects an park resources
and visitor experiences" and; I� �
• That it provide for "apgrapriate public input at the park
i
level."0 �
f
e Report
gp Airport Noise Report
Burbank
AIRPt�RT GETS LAND
NEEDEZ} FOR TER�MINAL
Despite intense last-minute legal maneuverin� by the City
of Burbank and the State af Califarnia, the Burbank-
Gtendale-Pasadena Airport Authority took possession of a
130-aere tract of iand needed for a new airport terminai on
June 8, as scheduied.
But while the airport now has awnership af the land it
needs for a new terminal, it has been barred by caurt order
from doing anythino with the land except cleaninQ it up
until a state court determines whether California law
requires the airpart to Cet approvaI of its expansion project
from the City of Burbank, where the land is located.
On 7une 5, the Second District Court of Appeai rejecied a
petition by the City af $nrbank ta prevent ttte arder af
gossession for the land from taking effect. Qn June 6, two
different Superior court jud�es allowed che order to stand in
response to last-minute efforts by the City of Burbank to
keep the land from changina hands from the Lackheed-
Martin Carp. to the airport.
"We came out better than we haped," said Thamas E.
Greer, executive director of the airport. "We were pieased ta
see aur positian upheid that we had a vaiid caurt order
giving us the land. But Burbank was also trying to keep us
from continuing dematitian and environmental cleanup on
the property. That wasn"t in the public's interest, and the
judge wasn't going to let that happen."
The airport argued the site had been rendeced unsafe by
previous demolition efforts by Lockheed-Martin Corp.,
which farmeriy owned it, and the court aareed to a21aw ttie
airport authority ta continue demolitian af buildin�s as well
as to remove debris and agply caverings to prevent dust
from spreading.
The City of Burbank had sought a temporary restraining
order to block the airport autharity from doing anything on
the land. Superiar Court Judge Carl J. West did not o ant
that but did order the airport nat to take any action on the
tand other than to ciean it up.
Peter Kirsch of the Denver office of t[1e law firm Cutler &
Stanfield, which represents the City of Burbank, disputes
the airport's notion tt2at it fared well in the court groceed-
in�s. "They �at possession of the land but they can't do
anything with it, which is the same as not havin� it," he told
,8,r�.
Attorneys for the City of Burbank and the State of
California toid Judae West at a June 6 hearin� that the
airpart authority's acquisidan of the Lackheed property
withaut Burbank's approval violaies both state law and the
California Canstitution. They told the judge that the airport
authoriry has stated publicly that it will not comply with a
state statute, Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21661.6,
because the airport believes it is preempted by federal Iaw.
The state law requires the airport autt�ority to first Cet the
approvai of the City of Burbank before buiiding iu new
terminai.
Judge West noted that the PUC law has never been
declared invaiid by any court and that the airpan authority is
proceeding ta take gossession of the Lockheed property at
its own risk, accardino to a Burbank press release. The
judne emphasized that no activities related to the proposed
expansion of the airport are to go forward priar ta a rulin�
on the validity of the PUC Section. The jud�e plans ko set a
schedule far a heann� on the PUC case tater this summer.
Joint Pawers Agreement
Meanwhile, one of several af the laws�its between the
airport and the City of Burbank ended June 18 when a
Superior Court judge ruled for the third and final time
against a Burbank challenge to the 1991 amendment to the
Joint Powers Agreemenk formin� the Burbank-Glendale-
Pasadena Airport Authority.
In aimin, to void the 199i amendment, Burbank's
compIaint saught a court interpretation of the 7oint Powers
Agreement which woutd have given the city's airpart
cammissianers voting rights over the propased replacement
terminal at the airport, based on the alleged noise imgact of
the prajecL
The sait was originally filed a year ago against the cities
of Glendale and Pasadena, casigners of the 7aint Powers
A�reecnent, and the airport authority was later added as a
defendant.
Wtrile the court has settled the matter af the Joiat Powers
Agreement, there aze stil2 10 ather tegal cases pending on
ihe issue of the airpor's expansion. In an effort to aet the
dispute over the expansion aut of the courts, the City of
Burbank and the airport authority recendy a�eed to once
again try mediation to resolve their differences over the new
ternunaI. They dropped th� twa mediators they had been
using, under which na a� eement was reached, and Irired
I?ana Peterson, of the Stanford Law Schaal faculty as a
mediator.
The California Attomey General had offered to have his
office mediate the matter, but the airport authority rejected
that proposal because the attorney general has sided with the
City of Burbank in its interpretation of the PUC statute,Q
Legislation
BILL WCiUI.D PUT EPA IN CHARGE
OF NOISE RESEARCH PROGRAM
On June 25, Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) introduced the
Quiet Communiues Act of 1997, which would autharize
funding to revive the Environmental Protecdan Agency's
long-darmant O�ce of Noise Abatement and Cantral
(ONAC) and put it once again in charge af federai noise
mitigation efforts.
T`he legislation would authorize to be appropriated for
ONAC $5 million for each af fiscal years 1998, 1999, and
20f10, and $S million for each of fiscal years 2001 and 2002.
Airport Noise Report
r
�
�
June 23,1997
Similar lesislation was introduced in the House by Rep.
Nita Lawey�{D-NY) at the end of the last sessian of
Can�ress and again early this year.
Torricelii's bill wautd require the EPA naise office,
unfunded since 1982, to coordinate ali federal noise
abatement activities, to update or develop noise standards,
ta provide technical assistance to locai communides, and to
promote research and educatian on the impacts of noise
pollution, inciudin� but not lirnited ta aircraft noise.
"In the past the Federal Aviation Administration has been
responsibie for monitorina noise gaIIution standards. This
leaislation will place this task upon the agency designed to
grotect the pablic's intereszs, the EPA, and take it from an
asency designed to pramote the airIine industry," Torricelii
stated at a May 19 news conference in Scotch Plains, NJ, to
announced the bill.
With airplanes roaring overhead, Sen. Torricelli aad NJ
Rep. Bob Franks applauded the efforts Pamela Barsam-
Brqwn, executive director of the New Jersey Coalition
Against Aircraft Naise {NJCp�AN}, which has been fighting
the FAA for 10 years to solve the noise problem created in
19$7 when ttte FAA extensively rerouted aircraft over
northern New Jersey under its Expanded East Coast Plan.
The press conference announcin� the bill was hosted by
Barsam-$rown and hetd in front flf her home.
"We know that there is real evidence that people subjected
to cantinuaus air noise expasuze suffer reat health coase-
queaces," Torricelli said. He said that studies have shown
noise pollution can result ia sleep deprivation, hygertension,
and has been linked to cardiovascular problems.
He said that New Jersey residents are particularly suscep-
tible ta the effects af noise poiiution due to the praximity of
three major auports: Newark, LaGuazdia, and Kennedy, as
weii as regionai airparts across the state. Newark A,.irpart, he
said, is naw ranked the third busiest airport in the country
with 140,104 flzghts per year.
Flanked by represenUatives of enviranmental oraanizations
from 13 New Jersey counties and New York Cicy, Tbrricelli
said that "noise poilutian is a problem not oniy for those
communities affected by the flight paths of Newark,
LaC.�uardia, and Kennedy Airports, but for communities near
any smali landing strip. This legisladon will help pravide
relzef to aII communicies pla�ued by air traffic noise."
Centers Would be Reopened
The legislation would reopen 10 centers across the
country, inciuding one located at Rutgers Universiry in New
Brunswick, NJ, ta gather scientific data and anaIyze the
impact of air noise on nearby communities. Most impor-
tantly, Tarricelli stressed, the Quiet Communiaes Act wouId
put the EPA at the center of air noise studies and assure that
enviranmental impact wouid be a grimary cancern instead
of a secondary issue.
Tarricei3i's bill also would require the EPA noise o�ce to
submit to Congress and the FAA, within 18 rnonths of
enactment of the legislation, a study on airQart noise. Ttze
Airport Noise R
$1
study must examine the FAA's selection of noise measure-
ment methodolaaies, the threshaid �of noise at which health
impacts are felt, and the effectiveness of noise abatement
pro�rams at airports around the Uni�ed States.
Franks Bill on Hald �
r
Meanwhile, NJCAAN is publicly deridino Rep. Bob
Franks {R-NJ) for delaying introduction of a bill, entitled
""iiie Bi-State Air Noise Correctian Act," that wovId require
the FAA ro reduce noise levels from� aircraft arrivins and
departing frotn Newark Irtternaaanal Airport 6y b d$ aver
80 percent of khe affected re�ion. �
The legislation would leave it up to the FAA to determine
how ta make such a noise reduction,� which is intended to
miti�ate the impact of the aircraft noise problem caused by
the Expanded East �oast Plan. i 1
Franks first pled�ed to inuoduce ttie bill in Can�ress last
Sep.tember and has znade five promises since then to
introduce the measure, accacding to NJCAAN.
Tarricelli said that he has delaying# incroduction af his
legislation because of concerns express to him by Rep.
Raberi Menendez (D-NJ}, whose constittzents Iive ciose to
Newark Airport. Rep. Menendez feacs the legislation will
only make the noise problezn for his cons�ituents worse.
Franks and Menendez are scheduIed ta meet with FAA
Acting Directar Barry Valentine on 7uly 15 to discuss the
znatter. � �
Delaying introductian of the Franks' bill means that
NJCAAN "has no Iegisiation in the 1�,O5th Congress ta
reference for negotiation or lobbying� on this 10 year
controversy" over the Expa�ded East Coast Plan, the
coaIiuon said in a press release.d i�
Raleigh-Durham Int'l
.AIRPORT EXPLAINS CH(JICE
OF 55 DNL CONT{JUR �FOR N(JTICE
In April, the Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority mailed
out natices of "potential aircraft noise impact" ta aver 9,000
awners af praperty near the 12aleigh,Durham Internatianal
Airgort in an effart to lceep naise-sensitive people from
inadvertendy buying homes near the`airport.
But why did the airport autharity ciiaose ia send its notice
to residents as faz out as the 5� dB DIVL contour instead of
stoQping at the 65 dB DNL cantour vsed in federal land use
guideIines as the threshatd of compat�bie land use around
airports? I
John C. Brantiey, directar of the airport, answered th2s
question in recent correspondence ta,ANR following up on
an article on the natices that agpeared. in the Aprii 2I issue.
Armando Tovar, noise officer for the airport, acknowled�ed
in that article that some of the owners� of property lacated in
the area between 55 and b5 dB DNL coutd chaIlenge their
inclusian in the distribution because their property is ]ocated
outside the 65 dB DNL cantour the feideral government used
�
egart �
i
i
I
82 Airport Noise Report
as the threshold of compatible land use around airports.
"What appears to be missin�= from the article is the basic
reason the authority elected to use the composite 5� dB
DNL contour as the notification boundary." Brantley said.
He noted that in June 1989 the airport authority was sued by
approximately �I50 residential property owners, some of
whom lived outside the 5� dB DNL contour, alleging
inverse condemnation due to the increase in aircraft noise
that was associated with American Airlines establishin� a
hub operation at RDU two years earlier. North Carolina law
does not permit lawsuits to be filed on the basis of nuisance
and/or trespass for allesed dama�e due to noise, Bentley
explained. �
"In order to resolve the multiple suits which were filed
after the state couR refused to cenify the oriQinal class
action pleadinQ, the court consolidated the suits and
appointed an arbitration panel. The panel considered and
ruled on eioht of the cases, findin� that there had been a
taking to some extent with respect to properties as far out as,
but not beyond, the 5� dB DNL contour. The remainder of
the cases subsequently were settle based upon the panel's
findings in the first eight cases. The panel's findin�s and the
settlement were confirmed by the court, which awarded the
Authority avi�ation easements over the properties for which
a taking has been determined."
Thus, Bendey said, there is now a finding under state law
that residential property located as far away from the airport
as the 55 dB DNL contour may be adversely affected by
changes in aircraft noise su�cient to be considered a taking
under the theory of adverse condemnation. `"That is pre-
cisely the reason distribudon of the notices was not confined
to property within the composite 65 dB DNL contour, but
was extended to include property within the 5� dB DNL
contour." Bentley stressed that the airport authority "did not
take that step arbitrarily nor without �ood reason," but did
so because of the outcome of the earlier IitiQation in which it
had been the defendant.�
FICAN
CITIZEN COALITION URGES
LIMITS ON AIRPORT POLLUTION
A coalition of citizen or=anizations fightin� airport
pollution recently called for ti�hter federal re?ulations and
�reater airline coopera[ion to limit the environmental
impacts of the sharp increases in air traffic predicted in the
next 20 years.
`"fhe prospect of a triplin� of global air travel, coupled
with an anticipated decline in U.S. funds available to fund
noise mitigation programs, points to a sisnificant threat of
deterioratin� health conditions for millions living near
airports," said Dick Saunders, a Minneapolis-based spokes-
person for the coalition.
"With many of the lar�est U.S. airports nearin= or
exceedin� capacity, the costs of new runway construction
soarins, and relatively few convenient sites for new airports
available, residential communities near established airports
will likely bear the lar�est share of the pollution burden in
the next two decades," he predicted.
"It is therefore incumbent on sovernment a�encies and
airlines to work more closely with citizen �roups to develop
added safesuards to physical health and community
stability, and to adapt flight patterns to reflect community
inputs," he said.
Saunders outlined a composite list of sug�estions from 10
airport community organizations presented at a public
hearing sponsored by the Federal Interagency Committee on
Aviation Noise (FTCAN) held in Minneagolis on May 13.
FTCAN was established in 1993 to provide a forum for
discussion of aviation noise issues and to allow federal
agencies to coordinate their aviation noise research activi-
ties. The committee is comprised of representatives of
federal agencies concerned with aviation noise, including
the departments of Defense, Interior, Housing and Urban
Development, and Transportation, the Environmental
Protection Agency, and the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
Recommendations
The citizen coalition told FICAN that they wanted to see:
• Development of more accurate ways of reflecting true
aircraft noise levels in present computer models defining
aircraft noise patterns: "' '
• Recognition of the 55 dB DNL (average day-night noise
level) threshold as a starting point for noise mitigation
measures, instead of the present 65 dB DNL threshold;
• More research into the long term effects of noise on
children and senior citizens;
• Re-establishment of the EPA's O�ce of Noise Abate-
ment and Control, which was closed in the early 1980s at
the beginning of the Reagan Administration, ostensibly for
budgetary reasons;
• Revision of federal law to require airgorts to report toxic
emissions such as ozone, volatile organic compounds, and
niuogen oxides just as other industrial polluters must;
• More attention to public health impacts in environmental
impact statements prepared before new runways or airports
can be approved by the FAA;
• Regulation of tiny airborne particles, such as those found
in aircrafr exhaust fumes and soot, which are not covered
under present law;
• Better monitor hazardous chemicals used in de-icing and
other operadons at airports before they leak or are spilled in
�roundwater supplies;
• Greater use of hi�h-speed rail for trips under 500 miles;
and
• Study of cutbacks in the disproportionate share of
pollution impacts borne by residents living in airline hub
cities by dispersing more flights to non-hub cites.
Citizen �roups proposing the recommendations to FICAN
Airport Noise Report
`� June 23,1997
included those located near New York's Kennedy Interna-
tianai Airport, Pott Columbus International Airport,
ChicaQo O'Hare International Airport; Minneapolis-St. Paul
Internatianal Airgon, Denver Internatianal Airpon, San Jose
International Airport, Seattte-Tacoma International Airport,
and Manchester International Airport in Enaland, as well as
northern New 3ersey residents affected by air route chanaes
made under the Federal Aviation Administration's Ex-
panded East Caast Plan.
NOISE Comments
Tom Egan, president af the National Organization to
Insure a Sound-controlled Environment (NOISE), a�n
association of loca3 governments and others concerned
abaut aireraft noise, said NOISE is particularly concerned
that cunent ]aw governzz�a PassenQer Facility Charges
(PF'Cs) includes and exemption which allows airports with
apgroved Part 1S0 Airpart Naise Campatibility Programs to
use PFC revenue without respecring Part 150 plans, even
thaugh the communities surraunding the airport rely on
those pians when making their own land use decisians.
NOISE affered the following recommendation to FICAN:
� Require the FAA ta redefine DNL and to study the
health effects of noise;
• Require manitoring of SEL (Sound Exposure Levei) by
all commercial airports;
• Establish incentives to hasten canversian to Stage 3
aircraft;
• Establish a Stage 3.5 deadline;
• Require meanzngful input by citizens impacted by
aircraft noise in National Enviranmental Policy Act reviews
and require airport grogrzetors to hoid pubiic hearings for all
othec non-rnajor actions that have a noise impact;
• Reassess the validity of tl�e Integrated Naise Model;
• Amend certain federal laws, such as the housing replace-
ment law, that limit lacal governments' ability or increase
the cost of noise mitigadan;
• ClQpose the progosed drastic reducdon in funding of the
statutory 31 percent se-aside for aviatian noise mitigation,
from $144 million in fiscal 199'7 to $21 million in fiscal
1998 and oppose a simiIaziy severe prapased rednction in
overall Airport Improvement Fcagram funding fro $1.46
billian to $ i bilIion, one resvlt of whic� is to further
diminish the funds available to address noise pollution;
• Oppose a propased reduction in research, engineerin�,
and development funds far environment anci ener�y, which
includes the development of quieter aircraft ensine technol-
agy, from �4 miltian to $3 million; �
• Support adequate funding for the new OfFce of Noise
Ombudsman and related commanity advacacy and involve-
ment initiatives;
• Suppart restoratian of fund'zng arifl functianing for the
EPA noise o�ce;
• Support research to develop quieter aircraft engines.
Airport Noise R
,�
Part I50 Program
FAA APFROVED FRCiGRA.MS
FOR SPRINGFIELD, BQISE
On May 14 the FAA announced Nts approval af the Part
150 program for submitted by the City of Sprinafield, 4H,
for Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport.
Qucrighc approvai was �ranted to 2�6 of the 27 praposed
noise mitigatian acdons proposed in �the prosram. One
proposed land use measure, entitled �`Adapt Large Lot
Zoning Policy; ' was not approved for purposes of Pari I50
"unless accompanied by adequate sound insulation durinC
eonstruction,'" the aeency notice in the Federal Resister
stated. �
Seven af the agproved measures fo�r the Part 15Q program
addressed noise abatement and imppsed restrictions on
civilian and military aircraft runups �and aircraft flight
procedures. �
'Thirteen of the approved measures addressed land use
manageznent, inciuding valuntary acqnisition af homes in
noise sensitive areas; purchasing avigation easemenu for
homes within the 65 dB DNL cantour; incarparating land
use policies far the Part 150 program inta local comprehen-
szve pians; discouraging the exEension of saaitary sewer
systems to residential azeas impacted by naise; adopting
plan review guidelines for subdivision, rezoning, special
use, conditionai vse, and variance appiications; adopting
joint airport zoning in the a�irport environs, rezoning noise
sensitive areas as commercial; adapt�ng an infarmal fair
disclosure policy; revising building code regulations to
require sovnd insulation measures for development within
naise cantours; and requiring pIat notes to state that property
lies within a high noise area. !
Seven of the approved measures were Iisted as "program
management measures," including requiring the Qhio Air
Natianal Guard unit located at the aiipart ta particigate in
noise abatement procedures, nodfication of local aperators
of noise abatement procedures at the�airport, gublic availa-
biliry of noise exposure maps, and periodic review and
update of the Part 150 grogram. !
For further information on the program, contact Lawrence
C. King, FAA, Detroit Airports Disuict O�ce, Willow Run
Airgort, East, 8820 Beck Raad, Belleville, MI 481 i I; tei:
(313) 487-7293. j � �
Boise Program Appraved
On May 2, the FAA annaunced its�approvai af the noise
compatibiliry prograrn for Boise AirlTerminal in Boise, ID.
The agency granted autright approvai for a1123 of the
proposed noise mitigation actions cantained in the Part 150
program, but did not identify them i� the Federal Re�ister
notice. �
For further information on the program, contact Denn�s G.
Ossenkap, FAA, Narthwest Mavntain Region, AirgorEs
Division, ANM-611, 1641 Lind Ave�, SW, Renton, WA
9$Q55-4056. �
�
eport �
�
:�
ANR EDITORIAL
; ADVISORY BOARD I
Nlark Atwood,Esq.
Galland, Khar�sch. Morse & Garfinkle
Wa.ehington. D C.
Lee L. Blackman, Fsq.
McDermo«. Will & Emery
Los Angeles. Calif.
Dr. Clifford R. Bragdon, AICP
Dean, School of Aviation & Transportation Dowling
College
Eliot CuUer, Esq.
Cuder & Stanfield
W�shington, D.C.
J. Spencer Dickerson
Senior Vice President
American Association of Airport Executives
Edward J. DiPolvere
Administrator. National Association of Noise
Control Officials
Richard G. "Dick" Dyer
Aicport Environmen[al Specialis4 Division of
Aeronaudcs, Calif. Dept. of Transportaaon
E. Tazewell Ellett, Esq.
Hogan & Hartson
Washington, D.C.
Julie H. Ellis, Fsq.
Managing Dicector
Fedetal Express Corpomtion
Angel M. Garcia
co-cn��
Cidzens Against Newark Noise
E.H. ";4Ice" Haupt
Manager, Aiipoct and Enviranmental Services,
Nadonal Business Aircraft Association
Robert P. Silverberg, Esq.
Bagileo, Silverberg & Goldman
Washington, D.C.
Joanne W. Young, Esq.
Baker & Hosteder LLP
Washington, D.C.
Airport Noise
Noise Maps Approved
• Naples Municipal Airport — On April 11, the FAA announced that
current and future noise exposure maps submitted by the City of Naples,
FL, for Naples Municipal Airport meet federal requirements.
The city also submitted a proposed revised noise compatibility program
for the airport, which will be approved or disapproved by Sept. 29.
For funher information, contact Tommy J. Pickerin�, P.E., FAA,
Orlando Airports District Office; tel: (407) 812-6331.
• Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport — On April 25, the FAA
announced that an updated future noise exposure map submitted by the
Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority for Sarasota-Bradenton International
Airport meets federal requirements.
The agency also announced that it is reviewin� the proposed noise
compatibility program update for the airport and that the review will be
completed by Oct. 12.
For further information, contact Tommy J. Pickering of the Orlando
FAA Airports District Office at the telephone number listed above.�
IN BRIEF ...
New Cargo Facility at Reno
In July, a new 55,000 square foot air cargo facility is scheduled to open
at the north end of the Reno/Tahoe International Airport. Air cargo
activity at the airport for 1996 increased 30 percent — almost double the
national rate, the airport announced. Year-to-date air cargo activity was
up 29 percent with a total of 35,064,334 pounds of cargo.
May 1997 passenger total continued the double-digit b owth trend
experienced last year. Total passengers in May 1997 a ew by 10.2 percent
compared to May 1996.
Howe is New ACI Director General
Johathan Howe has been appointed the new director general of the
Geneva-based Airports Council International, the association announced
June 6. His appointment will become effective on Sept. 15 when he
succeeds Oris W. Dunham Jr., whose term of office, which began in
1991, comes to an end.
In his new position, Mr. Howe will be ACI's principal spokesman and
will be responsible for developing ACI's services to member airports,
reinforcing ACI's relations with other international aviation bodies, and
enhancing liaison with ACI's six regions and the regional staff.
AIRPORT NOISE Ri�PORT
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher Marguerite Lambert, Production Coordinator
Charies F. Price, Contributing Editor; Anne Jacobs, Circulation Editor; Maria T. Norton, Production Editor
Published 25 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 22011; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
Price �495.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is o anted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 27 Congress S[reet, Salem, MA 01970. USA.
Copyright O 1997 by Airport Noise Report, Ashbum, Va. 22011
AGENDA r; �� `��C � � ��'�
REGULAR MEETING `'� i�'2 ��9j
' EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSIOI�f ��. �-►a
EAGAN, MII�TNESOTA �""�
' i
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS j
July 8,1997 '�
7:00 P.M. I
�
�
' I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES '
,I I
I
u . �+T�+'�i'�`iSi�+ ; i��Js,u�i,�� �
�
v. rrEw BusnvEss
ti
11
►
�
A. Airports Legislative Program — Correspondence to (
Delegation
WORKSHOP REPORT I
STAFF REPORT �
A. National NOISE Conference in Eagan - July 2�-26 ;
B. Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor �
C. MASAC Update i
D. Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition �
INFORMATIVE - ;
�
FUTURE AGENDA ;
I
NEXT COMIVIISSION MEETING - 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 12 'I
NEXT COMIVIISSION WORKSHOP - 7:00 p.m. Thursday, July 17
NEXT MASAC MEETING - 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, July 22 '
,
ADJOURNMENT , I
a�
Azailiary aidr for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less
than 96 hours is received the City of Eagcm will attempt to provide such aid �I (