The URL can be used to link to this page

1994-06-16 Council-ARC Workshop, ; � � CITY OF D�NDOTA H$IGHTS DAKOTA COIINT3t, MINNESOTA CITY COIINCIL / AIRPORT RELATIONS CObmlISSION JOINT WORRSHOP AGENDA JIIN$ 16, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call/Introductions. 3. Review of Process Used to Develop Draft Air Noise P1� Action. 4. Review List of Air Noise Topics for Consideration. 5. Discuss Draft Goals and Action Steps Identified in P 6. Other Comments or Concernse 7 . Adj ourn . Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upo at least 120 hours in advaace. =f a aotice of less hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will ma attempt to provide the aids, however, this may aot be on short aotice. Please contact City Admiaistratioa 1850 with requests. 0 of request han 120 e every ossible at 452 - � t TOs FROM: SIIBJ$CT: CITY OF NlENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO June 13, 1994 Mayor, City Council and Member of the Airports Relations Commission Tom Lawell, City Administ Joint Workshop Discussion - Air Noise Plan of � a Please be reminded the City Council and the Airport Relations Commission (ARC) will be meeting in a joint wor this Thursday; June 16, to discuas the preparation of a P Action aimed at reducing airport noise within Mendota Hei is the intent of this memo and attachmenta to lay the bas the workshop. . DISCIISSION• Given the magnitude of the "airport isaue", it is of difficult to make headway in our fight to minimize commun noise. Easily there are 10-12 broad categories of air no related policy issues which could command our attention a resources. In order to address the "whole", the Commissio the importance of dealing with the "parts" in hopes of ma incremental progress on the air noise problem. By ��chunk air noise problem down into "doable" action steps, we cou the City on course to make meaningful strides for the fut The model the Commission chose to use in developing of Action involves five basic steps. These include: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Identify Focus Issue Identify Specific Goal List What Needs To Be Done - Action Steps Identify Who Will Work On Each Step Determine When Each Step Is To Be Done tion an of hts. It s for en ty air se d noted ing ng" the d set re. he Plan � 9 Based on this model the Commission chose to focus following five policy issues: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Noise Reduction Through Modified Take-Off Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Nois Concerns I�lSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan - Airport Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft Noise Reduction Through Litigation the ion Within these five policy issues the Commission iden ified eleven goals which might be worthy of our pursuit. Atta hed please find a copy of a draft Plan of Action as develope by the Commission at.its June 8th meeting. Please note that a umber of the ideas expressed in the document are just that, ideas which will certainly need further work prior to adoption and implementation. Furthermore, some of the ideaa may be m tually exclusive-- for example, some of the ideas advocate for concentrating air traffic over a amaller defined area whi e other advocate for greater aircraft fanning. The advance circulation of the document will hopeful you some time to review and digest some of the thoughts c within. At the workshop we will briefly review the proce for developing the draft Plan of Action and we will also � each of the nine proposed air noise reduction goals. Loo forward to seeing everyone at the workshop! u y allow ntained s used ng _1 i� -�;' �', "� > CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHITS AI RPORT NOISE PLAN O�F ACTI ON Draft Plan �-- June 16, 1994 ' �, � `:i � :� F' . j' , Air l�oise Plan oi Action Action I'lan Surnmary A) Action Plan Development Process B) List of Possible Topics of Consideration C) Action Plan Elements: 1 e Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff a) Implementation of Non-Simultaneous T eoff Proced.ures Wluch MiYumize Mendota eights Air ' Noise Exposure � � b) Test of 11L/11R Departure Procedure e�'ined by VOR Navigational Aids c) Test of 11L/11R Departure Procedure D' fined by Distance 1Vleasur�g Equipment (DME) avigational Aids d) Adopt�on of "Close-In°' vs. "Distant" T� Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Mendota Heights e) Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeo �< � Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation ; Mendota Heights , � j �� 2. 3. 4. 5. �:° '�� :� Air Noise Pl�n oi Action Action Plan Sumn�ary Contin Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Ai Noise Concerns a) Produce and I�istribute Informative Ref igerator Magnets Advertising the MAC Air Noi e Complaint I,ine b) Expand Distribution of Air Noise ` Information c) Appointment of City Resident to the t�11�O�S �:OliliYllSSlOri MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan a) Prevent Construction of Third North Runway Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft a) Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline 2000 Noise Reduction � T�irough Litigation it�Il Year �� :,� a) Determine Feasibility of a Lega1 Challen e to Current Air Noise Distribution �� Air 1�Toise I'lan of Action Actiom Plan 1)evelopment * Identify Focus Issue * Identify Specific Goal * List What Needs To Be Done - Action Steps * Identify WXio Will Work On Each Step ��-�� * Determine When Each Step Is To Be Done � DRAFT 0 0 Air Noise Plan of Action Possible Topics of Consideratio * Dual Track Airport Planning � - �Zelocation of MSP - Expansion of MSP �r �C * * � � * * t Stage III "Quiet" Aircraft Mendota Heights/Eagan Corridor IZeview of Noise Reduction Takeoff Profiles iZeview of Noise Reduction Takeoff Headings IVigllttime Curfew Restrictions Part 150 Noise Program 1V�innesota Pollution Control Agency Regulations Part 150 Program Runway 4-22 Extension � �`. �. �:, � Issue; Air 1Voise Plan of A��ion Noise lZeduction '�hrougii Modified Takeoff Caoal: Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Which Muumize Mendota Heights Air Noise � Action Steps: 1. Review previous MAC �epresentations on issue with City Council � 2. Draft letter to MAC requesting � ; update on revised non-simultaneous takeoff procedures - invite�• Mr. Hamiel to upcoming ARC meeting , �, � •� Staff/ARC Staff 3. Depending upon response, chose Staff/ARC appropriate means of advocating rapid implementation of new p�ocedures J� Jt �__ �� ,� ; cedures sure 16, 1994 20, 1994 Jup.y 13, 1994 Air Noise Plan of Action Noise Reduction Through IVlodified Takeoff P� T'est of 11L/11R Departure Procedure Defined Navigational Aids Action Steps: 1 a Review proposal with Council 2. Prepare submittal to MAC 3. Council approves submittal � 34 o MAC refers submittal to 1V�ASAC � 5. MASAC refers submittal to 1VIASAC Operations Committee 6. MASAC Operations Committee reports to full MASAC 7. MASAC reports recommendation to MAC Planning and Environment Committee 8. MAC Planning and Environment reports recommendation to 1VIAC �, � Who Staff/ARC Staff Council MAC MASAC MASAC 1VIASAC MAC DRAFT VOR J e 16, 1994 J y 1994 J ly 19, 1994 A gust 1994? S pt. 1994? Ja�i. 1995? Fe�b. 1995? 1995? Page 2 Issue: Noise Reduction Through NTodified Takeoff Pr ced�es Goal: Test of 11L/11R Departure Procedure Defined y VOR Navigational Aids Action Steps: 9. MAC recommends to FAA procedure be tested 10. FAA designs 60-day departure test � � �; � 11. FAA begins 60-day test ., � MAC � :. � pril 1995? ay - June 1 95? J ly 1995? Issue: Cioal: Air Noise Plan of Action Noise �Zeduction Througl� 1Vlodified Takeoff P� Test of 11L/11R Departure Procedure Defined Measuring Equipment (DME) Navigational Ai� Action Steps: 1. Review proposal with Council 2. Prepare submittal to MAC 3. Council approves subnuttal �� 4 o MAC refers submittal to �• MASAC 5. MASAC refers submittal to MASAC Operations Committee 6. I1/IAS1�C Operations Comrnittee reports to full MASAC Distance Staff/ARC J e 16, 1994 Staff J y 1994 Council MAC MASAC MASAC u 7. MASAC reports recommendation NiASAC to MAC Planning and Environment Committee J�ly 19, 1994 gust 1994? 1994? Ja�i. 1995? F�b . .1995? 8. MAC Planning and Environment MAC March 995? �' '�. reports recommendation to MAC G�o t •P ".� � . �Page 2 Issuee Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Pr cedures Goal: Test of 11L/11R Departure Procedure Defined y Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) Navigational Aid Action Steps: Who , en 9. MAC recommends to FAA procedure be tested 10. FAA designs 60-day departure test <<�----�,11. FAA begins 60-day test 5 i � MAC 0 il 1995? ay - Juaie 1 95? J�ly 1995? ;� � Issue: Goal: Air ilTo�se Plan of Action Noise Reduction Through Modified. Takeoff Adoption of "Close-In" vs e"Distant" Ta.keoff to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota HeiQ Action Steps : 1 o Review FA1� Require�nents witli City Council Who Staff/ARC J 2. Continue Participation on Staff/Council MASAC Operations Committee �-`; vvhich is currently rev�ewing issue -, 3 e MASAC Operations Committee reports to full MASAC MASAC J� 4. MASAC reports recommendation MASAC to MAC Planning and Environment Committee � . MAC Planaung and Environment reports recommendation to li�AC 6. MAC recommends to FAA procedure be tested MAC � MAC � �� . .�. 16, 1994 going 1994? . 1995? 1994? . 1994? i , Issue: � ;Goa1: Noise IZeduction �hrougl� I1/Iodi�ied Takeoff Adoption of "C1ose-In"' �s. "i�ist�nt"' Takeoff to Reduce Noise Generaiion Over Mendota �Iei� � �� 1 Actian Stepso � � 1, FAA designs flight procedure ! be tested ; FA.A beg�.ns �igh� test � :. .: 0 '�' �►•, 1994? . 1994? h � Issue: Air Noise Plan of Action Noise Reduction Through 1Vlodified. Takeoff Goal: Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regul ti ; Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights ' Action Steps: ; 1. Review previous MAC � representations on issue � � with City Council : , 2. Research nighttime flight �'; restrictions imposed at other � ' U. S . airports . 3',. Depending upon findings, ; prepare request to MAC � for adoption of more stringent �I requirements t �• Staff/ARC Staff/ARC Staff/ARC J� J A 1 i� 16, 1994 y 1994 .-Sept. , � �, !, . °�. 1 � 1 � Issue: Heigiiten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air No �� . . Goa1: Produce a�d Distribute Informative Refrigerator � Advertisi:ng the MAC A.xr Noise C�amplaint Line �' , Actaon Steps: Investxgate costs of magnet produ�t�on and d�stributaon Comm.�ssian to review design Qrder delivered to City Hall Ma.gnets distributed to Council and Airport R�Iations �ommission Magnets distributed Soutli af TH110 l�agnets available ta �.11 other �ity residents and businesses. Staff - Com�missxon J, J� Staff J� Staff J� Staff � �� °� 1' Concerns ay 1994 ne S, 1994 ne 1f , �994 ne 16, 1994 e 22, 1994 til �one Issue: i C7oa1: � , i A�r Noise Plan of Action Heighten Awareness of NTendota Heights Air No Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Aetion Steps: 1 � 1. Expand mailing list for ARC agenda i to include State Senators and Reps. 5' Mail letters to State Senators and Representatives introducing ARC Invite guests to monthly ARC �neetings (iea, M�. Hamiel, IVIro Wagoner, State elected. officials) Expand coverage of air noise issues in City newsletter Continue d.istribution of refrigerato� magnets advertising MAC ai� noise complaint line Who ` Staff J� Staff Staff Staff Staff �� Concerns 1994 J�ly 1994 going . 1994 going Air I�Toise Plan of Action Issue: Heighten �iwareness of Mendota Heights Air N� � C�oal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolit; ; Commission � ; Action Steps: Who 1. Review current distribution of � MAC Commissioners witli ARC , 2 o Discuss City concerns with our '; current MAC representative Prepare letter to gubernator�al candidates asking for �iieir position on MSP expansion, corridor use, MAC representation Monitor gubernatorial election tlus fall 5: Discuss concerns witli State t , Senators and Reps. regarding composition of MAC � 6` Draft legislation to amend '� number of commissioners �'; � and districts boundaries � '� ` ; represented Staff Council Staff Staff Staff/ARC Staff `�.r �. 'fi�' �f Concerns Airports J�ly 1994 . 1994 . 1994 Nbv. 1994 J J 1995 1995 � t Ai� 10Toise Plan oi Action � � ;Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan , � Goal: Prevent Construction of Tl�rd North Parallel I �� Action Steps: � �� - 1 o Update Commission on status of MSP LTCP study E � � - 2. Continue participation on MSP ; Technical Working Committee , 3. Respond to public commeiit j request on Draft Alternative Environmental Document for 1VISP , � 4. Retain experts to assist in efforts '� to prevent the designation of the i third north parallel runway as t11e �� preferred MSP expansion �ternative i Staff Staff Council Council 0 Respond to public comment Council request on Fina1 Alternative Environmental I�ocument for MSP ay J�ily 13, 1994 going . 1994 Needed . 1994 � Issue: � Goal: � � Air Noise Plan of Action Conversion to Stage ffi Quieter Aircraft Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Y Actio� Steps: 1 e Review NWA obligations to � MAC regarding Stage II phaseout , : 2. Prepare letter to MAC regarding ' ongoing contract talks with NWA ; i to request inclusion of language �; specifying phase out date �- � 3. � i , 5: � Who Staff/ARC Staff J �'. �' 1 2000 1994 J�ly 1994 Work witli MAC comrnissioners Staff/ARC A who are supportive of effort to help build consensus amongst MAC Letter to NWA asking for �lieir cooperation in committing to Year 2000 phaseout. Prepare media news releases and information letters explaining issue and asking for letters and/or ca11s to IV�AC in support of contractual language Staff Staff 0 . 1994 . 1994 . 1994 � Issueo � � Cioa1: � �r Noise Plan of Action Noise Reduction Through Litigation �� Deterr�iine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Noise I�istribution Action Steps: �� 1, Review liistory of legal 4: � �t challenges related to air noise Investigate FAA procedures in effect at time of 1973 corridor decision - �reedom of Information Act request? , Who Staff/ARC Staff Information to be presented to AI�C Staff and recommendation formulated Council considers recommendation Council and determines desired course of action 0 �. ,;: : Air S�pt. 1994 O t. 1994 - A r. 1995 y 1995 J e 1995 0 � . . . . �� /��%'hi ° � � ��f/�r ji� r-^--��,.._..��^'�/ / / � f / / ----� �� ,,,, -- ,.._....... / i %��i'�I % i .�- --�''—`� —� / r / �/ / � -' / �� . ---� '—',,,� �./ // / / � -+ -- " / /�� f�� // /j '�'� �� Y f // . i �` � - rr.r / �/ �,EI'�'� j,'.� .-"� ,� - � ,�� r i r-� ,,� .- .• _� � i ' � / /i''/// /� " �/ / // // � • ,,.. 9t� - .,,, l . ; ''� /r / r ,,i / i .% . ,.� �� •�'f /',�i�,,� � �r�►G. 0�°, /�/j /i /�/r,, �, 3 � � �r� � � �-�- y � t /��j � �� t � ` '� � } � � � /!i, i �� FG/,//'�� / ��f %� : �! ,'' � ! � � %, r, j �"r' �� . -� � ��-j'� ��,� , . ,,,, ,�T .►, �,~a� ' ^22� C,t��'NE�D � .� y .�. � �N, •,, -`W �`.%� �...� << • � „�� '/Y� ,/...� .� � ♦ �� -�' �■.,5� �;y�,, , �;sy,,, F ��+li''��• Y',,,�,y r`"";,��f;'`�� ;y;,��;sy � � '� � � /. // � ;• , . , { � � 2�ti� / /•% /� j f �l� �j / �,f."�,�.i�o $ •��r'' , • ` ' - ,� � f /�� x •/ t - o `� . �. � 1 ��` j�I - f jJ11 • J I , a� o '� ' eany�tN� t,�w� Aac.� � '\ / l�/ l� �/ f � ' f � � � � x� r r . ' . 1 �y� f f� � � � j j� �:. � j� . o ,�-.� , .,. c� t/ f /1 �/ flf/j f / /��; °o'` � r - ' i ---� . . - '�� /%j/ /j/ // l f •I j ��.�, ! - . ' , r 1� �� -� � f jf �I I I � � � x � f ' � � �, � .-'—'""�� . f�� _ _- / �/ � . O 'NEW y �--^"'� 0 � + sLiAG� Atz�S Ai�' �li� �i�'F�� - • AG1c3Rt, ��e�tl:�, j��'y�Ci'1oh�i' 15�%1vio� TF'+(Ai'� 2�._�i�oNl �,tlF�' �•. ,,�,n � � r . o �-~ , � .. �_....—..._ . _ . -�';� � � . ,, ,r '\ , . . _ ."_ -_--- ---- ---�:-.-_ . j_,,._ ' �~._.� . , -- ;,.c _. i _. _, 'C. l / �'� . , `"' � . -._. j/ jf l, � � f�X � �.",� �� ,�,,`�,.?,,'' • -�-�--� �i� �� a �. � � �/ t � +",►�.sZ.n t�►�'�� aaja I � % % � , % � '� ^` �-' « :�- - _ �.�„ l. ,.�l�T% � t '�.' � / N�.J�G � k f � � t1N1��i'l1�� . • ' t�r��'��c�wT�a . . .. x � / . � � , ; �/ �� l ��'"-•� � ",,.�_----' �,,,r � �r �.--- - ) _ J�/,f"9 �r��,,,,..,.� ..--- —'� J `.� �,.._�� • � 9,�� / y u � . ----._ .tcc=___,_.r"t�aYEV.tzY�� - _.�`-�"'��'_7�:-.,_` . _ a ~� _`� ....� i00—�^•.,--- . � . •� 2' Y!' � J,� ---- , �� ~ � , � � � � ♦ - . ., ,;: . 1 ♦ 1 � � ♦ .iil��'' �...�..'�`�� - - �' i��■ " � v � ♦ '''"` _,:v::..�� "' .�.� �M`i -v'� . ,. � i.ij�'��'° , i . � � .+g a� �tl .,, � ,I � _� � ... . , , � .. . . .: � � � Oc1l.'V' �;,1�,� _ . .. �„r,rT�;;�"��t �.� ,' a--� '' ' � .,,r . ir� �XA�IIIIII .- ; , I1„' II � - _....._ _ __ _ ="!i�=`-..__ __— �J , a � `'�_ � . _ 1 .� . ,�q"�.a � � ,� ..nr�w� � � '�� rlt� �i� �.. . . � / �� ,, �'"�'�r��.x��Ei� ��F� i�I':."F i 1 �i ' L� ��iii .. .. -, gt �� •_— `�" `� ""�sCs�sl :._--s._ _ .�� ----------- � . �► .� 4..1r}�J� ' —_r,�._ i4 ��i . � _ � . . • _ � .." -'�c�,.. - � __'" ' --_ ..—�r _ �'i�� '— � I�Iilll��. � -.S� fy = � y ..- � -� ` �� •ir ` � � � ^ �` j rr4��;�� . � _�� -��., �' .,- .. ., , . �• �� . -� , � �� r -::�,:*. -._::.. ., �i � .�% � .. � : , .... . �i � .._:.... / � >s::. �� L.lG+-!T5 ti' �. �"----- 5�E S�t�ERA7F DRAtYitiiG�'i FROM 50C.`a ENC�R us ccEo ue Foa �rravG �r,a,�y , "�°"`� � � FENC'..E NOTES ADP�D 6/13/l994 ��, : ' � -REPLAGE �?USTNG 6FT FENC'�E WITH � 8FT FENGE -Rt�t..AGF EX15T GA1� WJ7'N 8FT E�lE,1-1 GATE, lZ�i WGE ' ° � nlorr� Lar��cat� our� �FNGES FOR ZOI�VG AAPGlGATION a �. 6A T � r �°o : �n V �e�.'�� N � � 2lll-O � t _ ::.. rtw e�a, Ivart � � aN. � XH :�:: :::::• .•• �,�Y � OuS7A1G �AG�� : .�" w.at.K •� ' � b1�"� � (�- ��y��/�y�� t A CER Po4 4T �y � 1.YCL +vllJ41 w Ay@'a 4T , � N � " POF�@_EEC:d-�R---5eap �� lt .. b�� M� FUTU4� TRAGK AG7'lVITES ��Pa � AG77 5 ,S � W , . . . � �p O 0 OCRtD W5T@NIX?GKE � 7V 1WiQ�G AT �i777�T �� "NN• � '{ � {`� 1 ,D/ 5G l.%,�• wE'r'.oTs�in ��V �7k�63^'P� �, � norF ne crnfrr-� � � „�\��"`a+or�'o�r�ttir•�n ser�i�v�r��rur�, � 6/13/94 �v auv�nov wn. ,�au enw» r r�..s�cc �� FENC�E SETf.iAGK AT $, � t�W 8FT F�NGF � e-ra 50UTN 6ATE 6/!3/44 �,,�T �T�� e� 8�a ��p��\ � � �o.o e� � 1,� � ��_ �". _"""�- � ,,, �� S1T� PLAN �NOWIN� TlG1��T BUOTNS AND GONG�E��ION 5�.��l�q� ET `.�T TF-iflMA� AGADEMY STAOCUM � �,� �