1994-11-011. Cal.l to Order
2. Roll Call
3.
4.
�
�
"7 .
C�TY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNSSOTA
AGENDA
November 1, 1994 - 7:38 P,M.
Agenda Adoption
Conseat Caleadar
a. Acknowledgment of the Buildin.g Activity Report for
October,
b. Approval af RESOLIITION N0. 94-75 - A Resolution Providing
for the Tssuance and Sa1e of Refunding Revenue Bonds
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to
469.1651, on Behal� af Northwestern Natiorial Life
� Insurance Campany.
c. Adoption of St�reet Namea for Unnamed Streeta -
ORDINANCL NO. 299
d. Authoriza�ion to Release Phase II of the Hi hway 55
Corridor Study. E
e. Acknowledgmen�. of the October 27 Planning Commission
Minutes.
f. Approval of the List of Contractors.
g. Approval af the List of Claims.
End of Con�ent Calendar
Public Commeats
IIafiaished aad New Susiaess
a. Discuss Friendly Hills�Taak Force Report. � '� G�--��
b. Discuss Pentel Antenna Issue. �
c. Case No. 94-34: Schneeman - Variance
d. Case No, 94.31: Mendota Heights United Church
of Chri�t - Variance
e. Case No. 94-32Y Heaver Design - Lat �pli� -
RSSOLUTION N0.
f. Case No. 94-33; General Pump, Inc. - Variances
g. 'Discuss the Purchase of Fransan/Perron Property.
h. Discuss GIS PragramjFunding.
1
'
T0:
� FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Mayor, City Council and City
Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr.,
October 25, 1994
Administr
Treasurer t�'� `
, ,
SUBJPCT: Dakota Business•Plaza
�' ;
DISCQSSION
�
In � 19 87 the City provided Industrial Revenue f inancinc
Dakota Business Plaza building. The bonds were issued a
;when interest rates were high. The bonds can now be refir.
; the owners at a reduced rate . The attorneys for the borro�
;have submitted the attached resolution which has been rev
'Tom Hart.
City Resolution No. 79-10 requires two fees in connect
the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds. The first is
�deposit;of which any unspent balance is refunded to the b
:In this;case we will have no publication expenses, and
expense'should be the City Attorney review. I would r
waiving�this fee with agreement that our legal expense
directly by the borrower.
, The second fee is for the City accommodation in
�Industrial Revenue Bonds. As provided in the resolution,
!would be $14,000. At the time the original issue was aut
� the borrower paid the full fee, and in view of our past pra
refunding issues, I would recommend that one half the fee x
� for this issue.
t
'ACTION RLQIIIRED
; Approve the fees as discussed and adopt Resolution No.
iA RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF R
:REVENUE;BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 46
�469.1651, ON BEHALF OF NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE I
�COMPANY:
�
�LES:kkb�
�
I j .
for the
a time
nced by
r NWNL ,
�wed by
ion with
� $2,500
�rrower.
�ur only
be paid
issuing
his fee
orized,
tice on
waived
94- ,
FUNDING
.152 TO
RESt3LUTI{}N NO.
A RESOLUTION PROVSDING FOR TFiE ISSUANCE AND SALE
OF REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS PURSU,AN"I` TO
MINNESOTA STAZ'UTES, SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469.1651,
ON BEH[ALF OF NORTF][WESTERN NATI4NAL LIFE INSUR�SiNCE COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci�.y af
Mend.ota Heights, Minnesota {the "City"?, as follows:
1. Au�horitv. The City is, by the Constitution and
laws of the State of Mi.nnesota, incl.uding Minneso�a Statutes,
Sec�ions 469.152 to 469.1651, as amended (the "Act"), authorized,
to issue and sell its revenue bonds and refunding revenue bonds
for the purpose of financing and refinancing costs of authori�ed
project� and to enter into agreements necessary or convenient in
the exercise o� the powers granted by �he Act.
2. Authoriza�„ion of Pro-ic�ct; Documents Presented.
Northwestern Na�ional Life Insurance Company, a Minne�ota stock
life insurance campany (the °Borrower�}, has propased to this
Council tha� the City issue and sell•i�s $2,300,Op0 City af
Mendota Xeights Industrial Develapmen.t Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Dakota Business Plaza Project), Serie� 1994, in subs�anta.ally
the form set forth in the hereinafter-mentioned Trust Indenture
(the "Bands"} pursuant to the Act and loan the praceeds thereof
Go the Borrower in order to reiinance cosCs incurred in the
acqua.sitian, construction and equipping of a commercial facility
in the City (the "Project"), owned by the Borrawer. The Bonda
are to be issued for the speci�ic authorized purpose of causing
�o be refunded �he City's auts�anding Gommercial Development
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1987 {Dakata Business Plaza
Project}, i�sued in the original aggregate principal amount of
$2,300,000 (the "Re�unded Bonds"l, and currently outstanding in
the aggregate principal. amount af $2,300,000. Forms of the
following documents relating to the Bonds have been submitted to
the City and are now on file in the office of the City Clerk:
{a} Loan Agreement {the "Loan Agreement"} dated as of
Sep�ember 1, 19�4, between the City and the Borrower, whereby
the City agrees to make a loan to the Barrower of the gross
proceed� af sale of the Bonds and the Borrower agrees to
cause the Refunded Bonds to be refunded in fu1.1, and �o pay
amounts in repaymen� of the I.oan sufficient to provide for
the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Bonds; and
{b} Trust Indenture {the "Trust Indenture") dated as of
8eptember 1, 1994, between the City and First Tru�t National
Association, as Tru�tee, authorizing the issuance of �.he
Bonds and pledging certain revenues, including those �o be
derived from the Loan Agreement, a� security for the Bonds,
I
i
�
�
�
;
and set�ing forth
relating thereto;
�
propased recitals, cavenants and
and
; (c) Bond Purchase Agreement
Agreementtt}, by and be�ween Dain
"Underwriter"), the Borrower, and
purchase of the Bonds from the Ci
setting the terms and conditions
(the "Bond Purchase
Boswarth Incorporated {the
�he City, providing for the
ty by the Underwriter and
of purchase; and �
�{d} Preliminary Official Statement and final
Statement, (together the "Official Statement"), des
the'offering of the Bonds, and cer�ain terms and pr
of the foregoing documents.
;
; 3. Findincrs. It is hereby found, determined
declared that;
' (a) The Proj ect, based upon info:rmation furnisYi
thelBorrower, canstitutes a project authorized by and
described in the Act.
;
� �(b) There is no litigation pending or, to the b
its,knowledge, threatened against the City� relating t
; Project ar �o the Bonds, the Loan Agreement, the Bond
Purchase Agreement or the Trust Indenture or ques�ion
; organizati.on, powers or autharity of the City.
;
(c} The execution, delivery and performance of
E City's obligations under the Bonds, the Trust 2ndentu
Bond Purchase Agreement and the I,oan Agreement do not
� wil2 not vio7.ate an.y charter provision, or any order
� cour� or other agency of government of which the City
; aware or in which the City is a party, or any indentu
agreement or other instrument to which the City is a
by which it or any of its property is bound, or be in
� conf].ict with, resul� in a breach of, ar canstitute (
notice or lapse of �ime or both} a default under any
indenture, agreement or other instrument.
�
� +{d} It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by
' City,upon the terms set for�h in the Trust Indenture,
' �he provisions oi which the City's znterest in the Lo;
i Agreemen� wiZl be pl.edged ta the Trustee as securi�y
j paynient of princa.pal af, premium, if any, anci interes
1 Bond�.
ficial
�ibing
�isions
a
ed by
est of
a the
ing �he
�he
re, �he
and
af any
is
re,
party or
�rith due
�uch
the
under
�
Eor the
� on the
�te} The Loan Agreemen�. provides for payments by�the
Borrower to �.he Trus�ee for the accoun�. of the City o:
amounts as will be sufficien� to pay the principal of
premium, if any, and interest on the Bands when due.
Loan;Agreement obligates the Borrower to pay for or c�
be paid a11 costs o� operation and ma.intenance of �,he
�
� -2-
i
i
1
�
i
�
�
such
The
.use to
Project
Facilities, including adequate insurance, taxes and special
assessments.
(fj Under the provisions of �he Act, and as provided in
the Loan Agreement and Trust Inden�ure, the Bonds are not to
be payable �ram nor charged upon any funds other �han amounts
payable pursuant to the Loan Agreement and moneys in the
funds and accounts held by the Trustee which are pledged to
the payment thereof; no owners of �he Bonds shall ever have
the right to compel the e.�cercise of the taxing power of the
City to pay any of the Bonds or the in�ere�t �hereon, nor to
enforce payment thereoi agains�. any property of the Ca.t�
{other than the�Ci�y's a.nteres�s in the Loan Agreemen�
assigned to the Trustee pursuant to the Inden�ure); the Bonds
shall. not cons�.itute a charge, lien ar encumbrance, legal ar
equa.tabZe, upon any praper�y of the City (other than the
City's interests in the Laan Agreement assigned to the
Truatee pursuant to the Indenture); and each Bond issued
under the Trust Indenture shall recite that� the Bond,
including interest thereon, sha2l not constitute or give rise
�o a charge against the general credit or taxing powers o�
�he Ci.ty.
4. Approval and Execution af .Documents. The forms of
Loan Agreement, Trust Indenture, and Bond Purchase Agreement,
referred to in paragraph 2, are approved. The Loan Agreement and
Trust Inden�ure sha11 be execu�ed in the name and on behal.f o�
�he City by the Ma.yor and the Gity Clerk, or other officers o�
the City, in substantially the farm on fiie, but with all such
changes therein, not� inconsistent with the Act or other law, as
may be approved by �he officers executi.ng �he same, which
approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execut'ion
thereof, and then shall be delivered to the Trustee. The Bond
Purchase Agreement shalZ be signed on behalf oi the City as
provided therein. Copies oi all doczunents shalZ be delivered and
filed as provided therein.
5. Approval, Executian and Delivery of Bonds, The City
shall prcaceed forthwith to issue the Bonds, in an aggrega�e
pr�.ncipal. amount of not to ec�cceeed $2,300,000, in the form and
upon the terms �et �orth in the Trust Indenture, which terms are
�or �,his purpose incorporated in this resolution and made a part
hereof; provided, hawever, that the intere�� rates to be borne by
the Bonds and the rights of opti.onal and mandatory redemption
with respect thereto shall aI.3. be as set forth in the final. form
of Indenture to be approved, executed and delivered by the '
officers of the City authorized to do so by the provisa.ons of
�his Resalution, which approval sha].l be conclusively evidenced
by such execution and delivery; and provided further that, in na
even�., shall such rates of interest produce a net a.nterest cos�
(to and until the Mandatory Purchase Date, as further provided in
�.he Indenture} a.n excess of 6.50o per annum. The Underwriter has
-3-
' agreed`pursuant ta the provisions of the Bond Purchase A
' and subject to the conditians �herein set for�h, �o purc
; Bands at the purchase price set forth in �.he Bond Purcha
� Agreement, and said purchase price is hereby �ound to be
favorable and is hereby accepted. The Ma.yor and City Cl
, other City officers are autharized and directed to prepa
execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Trust Zndenture a
� deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certa.fied c
this Re�olu�ion and the other documents required by Sect
of the Trust Indenture, for au�hentication, registration
delivery to the Underwriter. As provided in �he Trus� I
' each Bond shall conGain a recitaZ �hat it is issued purs�
� the Act, and such recital �ha11. be conclusive evidence a
� validity and regularity of the issuance thereof. ��
�
� 6. OfEicial St�atemen�. The City hereby con.�en
circu3ation by �he Underwriter of :the Official. Statement
offering the Bonds for sale; provided, however, that �he
: not participated in the preparation of the Official Stat+
independently verified the infarmation in the Official S�
and takes no responsibility for, and makes no representa1
warranta.es as to, the accuracy or completeness af such
information.
7. S10 Million Election. The Ci�y hereby eleci
the �10 mill.ion election with respect to the Bonds and c�
;capitaiiexpenditure� f.or the Project, as provided under :
' 144 (a) (4) o� the In�ernal Revenue Code of 1986, as amendE
,any appl.a.cahle predecessor Sectian of the Internal Revern
�of 1954; as amended prior to the enactment of �he Tax Rei
;of 1986}, shall apply to the Bands and the Project,
' 8. Certificates etc. The Mayor, City Clerk an
'officers of the City are au�hora.zed and directed to prepa
�urnish'to bond counsel. and the purchaser of the Bonds, w
issued,`cer�ified copies af ali proceedings and records o
City rel.ating ta the Bonds, and such other affidavits and
,certificates as may be required to show the facts appeari
�the book� and records in the o�ficers' cus�ody and con�ro
otherwise known to �hem; and all such certified capies,
certa.ficates and affidavits, including any heretofore fur
sha1.1 constitute representa�ions of the City a� ta the tr
all �tatements contained therein.
� ,
I '
I `
MF'�'15AB6 . WP5
i
f �
�
, i
.
-4-
�.11 L f
the
�rk and
�e and
�d to
�pg of
,on 2.08
and
.denture,
.ant to
the
� ta the
in
City has
ment or
atement
ions or
a that
: tain
;ction
i (or
: Code
�rm Act
t other
�e and
ten
: the
�g from
. or as
�ished,
�th of
CITY OF 1VIII�TDOTA HEIGHTS
;
TO: Mayor, City Council and City
; �
i FROM: �
; 1
,
� 1
' SUBJP.CT:,
�� �
���
Admnu -
Marc S. Mogan, P.�
Civil Engineer
Adoption of Street Names for
Unnamed Streets
October
�
DISCUSSION•
'� Th � eity Council solicited potential street names from Mendota Heights
,
, owners for five unnamed streets within the City for reasons of public health, sa
� convenience. City Council received many suggested names which were considE
� September�20, 1994 meeting. At that meeting, Council adopted the following :
'; identified by the appropriate number on the enclosed map.
1
, Strcet Nwnber Adopted Street Name
� �
1 Penon Road West
2 Penon Road East
3 Waters Drive
4 LeMay Iake Road
5 Centre Pointe Curve
Property owners whose properiy addresses would be changed as a result of
� street names were notif'ied, and instructed to fill out an enclosed postal service cha�
address form, which would become effective on Decemher 1, 1994 upon adoption
; publication of the appropriate ordinance. At this point in time we have recieved nc
� response oi claims of undue hazdship from those property owners who are directly
' these changes.
I 1
1 In a related matter, City staff has contacted MnDot, Dakota County, the Ci�
Mendota and St. Peter's Church for comment on the City's desire to rename that p�
� o1d existing State Trunk Highway 13 between Mendota Heights Road and the new :
i Interchange, Galtier Road. The only concern expressed by these parties came fron
� on behalf of the City of Mendota. Mendota needs this section of roadway to remai
ithrough traffic and is concerned that renaming this roadway might somehow influe�
; issue in the future. Fier concern is that Mendota Heights might assume some impli
1994
and
at the
t names
�e adopted
;e of
nd
negative
�ffected by
r of
rtion of
Zendota
7oan Olin
. open for
ce that
ownership or interest in this section of road by virtue of renaming it. She questions whether
this section of Highway 13 might revert to Mendota. Heights for the reason mentioned, if and
when MnDot turn back occurs. Knowing that Mendota Heights is on record suggesting that
their entire section of madway is not necessary, the concern is that through trafFic access might
cease if the roadway reverts to Mendota Heights. As this point, it is our opinion that this
section�of roadway will be turned back to Dakota County, which would insure that through
access remain intact. The other parties contacted had no objection to renaming that section of
roadway Galtier Road.
REC011�IlV�NDATION•
I recommend that Council adopt the proposed street names for the five (5) streets
identified per the enclosed exhibit, that the section of old existing Highway 13 between
Mendota Heights Road and the new Mendota Interchange remain on the MnDot highway
system or be turned back to Dakota. County, and that this section of roadway be renamed
Galtier Road.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council agrees with the recommendations, they should adopt Ordinance No. ,
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR 1'� CHANGE OF NAME OF PERRON ROAD
TO PERRON ROAD EAST AND WF.ST; STATE ffiGHWAY 110 FRONTAGE
ROADTO CENTRE POINTE CURVE; OLD STATE TRUNB ffiGHWAY 13 TO
GALTIER ROAD; AND NAIVIING OF STATE TRUNB ffiGHWAY 55 FRONTAGE
ROADS TO WATERS DRIVE AND LEMAY LA� ROAD and direct staff to publish
ordinance.
MSM:dfw
w
4 a i
� �
f �
� ;
� j .
� +
,
! � ; ��
f � ;�. ��•� 4�,. CZTX OF lfENDOTI!
� � �
�'� �
t�
{ �'
' �� ���
'�ry - _..,.
� .
I ��r'
' �a'�~� � .�,4�' �
`�y � ,�w�'' °a ,.,
i �. I ow �o "
�v`� ' � z
i ��� � �� � �
i GS� � 11CACIA
t �.� { a HLVD.
I . }
} '
i �
FINAL DESIGN FOR
HWYS 55, i�i0, and 13
MENDOTA BRIDGE AND ROADWAYS
TO BE COMPLETED IN LATE
1994 (OCT / NOV)
«eacorh
seicass.
• crrr
arrzces
� vZ�Y1RI� �,pgVE
I
0
�� 11 �,,,,a� ar�. ar. a� ,� aa4.
` ,,i���I�GE � +
1�p � '�
�� � � a �
�J � �
� CENTRE p4=�E
V � ORIVE
� tu�ncz � `� •� Qg`�'�,�.-
• FURL4NG / y4 r
� 4�' �
� � x
� ICEtTDpN � t�
��RCE „(�` �
, 4.
{ pgIVE� �. i3 � L71lCEf/IEW • /� %- � t��d
; � � �
, .� � �
I ' �� � ��
' � �
� ��
11 �a'���.� `�� r^-
r ���.. �,� 1
� �� .
p�xxoN Ru "�ya
�C x : d�,
, � � �
� �`�'?� � a, `. � MEDALLION
� � � �'a � � DRIVE
A4 �
i 1 � � ss �
� 1 H •�Ml�
r a
"'� � MEf3DOTX HEIGftTS ROAD
i
� �
a
e0
1 x
! 1 � ��
H
H
C
i �
I NORTHLANU DRIVE �
� t �
t I2dfiERSTAfiE 494
— __. i �i
i
I
'�"� �+'w► INDIGATES
�`� UNNAMED
� ROADWAYS
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY,II�IINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CHANGE OF NAME OF PERRON ROAD
TO PERRON ROAD EAST AND WEST; STATE ffiGHWAY 110 FRONTAGE ROAD
TO CENTRE POINTE CURVE; OLD STATE TRUNK ffiGHWAY 13 TO
GALTIER ROAD; AND NAA�IING OF STATE TRUNK ffiGHWAY 55 FRONTAGE
ROADS TO WATERS DRIVE AND LEMAY LAKE ItOAD
The City Council of the City of Mendota. Heights, Minnesota, daes hereby ordain:
SECTION 1. The name of the street situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota heretofore known and designated as "Perron Road" shall be and
hereby changed and renamed to "Perron Road West" from Old State Trunk
- Highway 13 (Sibley Memorial Highway) to the eastern terminus of the cul-de-
sac, and "Perron Road East" from Pilot Knob Road to the western terminus of
the cul-de-sac, and therefore shall hereafter be know as "Perron Road West and
"Penon Road East", respectively.
The name of the street situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota theretofore known and designated as "State Trunk Highway 110
Frontage Road" on the south side of Highway 110, between Lexington Avenue
and newly constructed State Trunk Highway 13, shall be and is hereby changed
and renamed to "Centre Pointe Curve".
The name of the street situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota. theretofore l�own and designated as "State Trunk Highway 13"
(Sibley Memorial Highway) between St. Peter's Church and Mendota Heights
Road, shall be and is hereby changed and renamed to "Galtier Road" and shall
hereafter be known as "Galtier Road".
The name of the street situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota. functioning as a frontage road on the south side of State Trunk
Highway 55 from approximately 0.34 miles north of Mendota Heights Road to
the northern terminus of the cul-de-sac near the newly realigned State Trunk
Fiighway 13 shall be and is hereby named "Waters Drive" and shall hereafter be
known as "Waters Drive" .
The name af the sl�t situated in the City of Mendota Heights, Dal
Minnesata, functianing as a firontage road on the north side of State
H3ghway 5� between Mendata Heights Road and the connection wi
realigned State Trunk Highway 13 north of Kendon Lane, shall be ;
named "LeMay Lake Road" and shall he�,after be known as "LeIVI�
Road" .
4
�
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
} according to 1aw.
Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 1 st day of November, 1994.
I
z
� crr� cocnvca.
� CITY OF MENDOTA
:
ATT'EST: �
�
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
!
i
�
�
�
�
{
�
,
t
Charles E. Mertensotto,
zata County,
: Trunk
th new
�nd is hereby
�v Lake
r
;
�
�
F
TO:
FROM: •
SIIBJLCT:
CITY OF biEI�TDOTA HEIGHTS
�� •
October 28, 1994�
Mayor and City Council
Tom Lawell, City Administr
Highway 55 Corridor Study - Phase II
DISCIISSION I
�
On September 20, 1994 the City entered into a contract with
Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc. (DSU) for planning services
related� to updating the Highway 55 Land Use Corridor Stu�.y. The
contract is divided into four phases, each of which must be
authori�zed by the City Council prior to commencement.
Phase I of the study is now complete and on October 24, 1994
the City Council and Planning Commission conducted a joint
workshop at which the results were presented. Based on that
meeting, it was the consensus of those present that Phase II of
the study be authorized. •
;
Attached please find a release form authorizing DSU to begin
the "Phase II - Land Use Options" portion of the study. Work on
this phase will be billed on a time plus materials basis at a
cost not to exceed $3,250.00.
�
I
ACTION REQIIIRED
i
s
A motion should be made to authorize Dahlgren, Shard�ow, and
Uban, Inc. to begin Phase II of the Highway 55 Land Use Corridor
Study Update at a cost not to exceed $3,250.00.
i
;
CITY OF �TDOTA H�IGHTS
HIGSWAY 55 CORRIDOR STQDY
DABLGREN, SHARDLOW AND IIBAN, INC.
As per the terms of the Contract for Professional Planning
Services between the City and Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, Inc.
regarding the Highway 55 Corridor Study, DSU is hereby authorized
to begin work on Phase II _ Land Use options
of the study.
Work on this phase of the study will not exceed a cost of
$ 3,250.00 without prior written authorization from the
City.
Signed this day of , 1994.
By
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
�
CITY OF N�NDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA CODNTY, MINNESOTA
j PLANNING CONIl�lISSION
� OCTOBLR 25, 1994
�
The regular'meeting of the Mendota Heighta Planning Commi,
held ori Tuesday, October 25, 1994, in the City Hall
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to
7:30 o'�clock P.M. The following members were present:
Friel, Betlej, Dwyer, Lorberbaum, Duggan and Tilsen. Alsc
were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Planning Consult
Uban, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and
Secretary Kim Blaeser.
,
INTRODIICTION OF NE�'� ���LR
�
� Chair Dwyer introduced new Planning Commissione
Lorberbaum to the Commission and community.
!
�,NNOUNC�NT
, Ch�ir Dwyer announced that on October 26, 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission will conduct a public
on�the MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Alternative �
He�announced that the hearing will be held at Washb
School, 201 West 49th Street, Minneapolis at 7: 00 0' c7
and that all interested community residents should att
hearing as it relates to the future expansion option
including the possible future construction of ad
runways and terminal facilities.
,
1
APPROVAL OF MINII'PLS
i
, Commissioner Duggan moved to approve the September
� minutes with corrections.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
i �
,
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: 1, LORBLRBAIIM
;
CASE N0� 94-34:
, SCffi1E�N -
�VARIANCE TO FRONT YARD '�
� FII�TCl3 BEIGHT '
, � �i
' Mr� Chris Schneeman, of 1561 Park Circle, was pr�l
I discuss his request for a front yard fence height
' which would allow the construction of a fence 40 incY:
inches in height within his front yard.
i
�
i
1
�
i
aion was
Council
order at
Roll,
present
ant John
Senior
r Sally
a94 the
hearing
�cument.
zrn High
ock P.M.
end this
s at MSP
3itional
7, 1994
�
�sent to
Tariance
�s to 48
f
Planning Commission
October 27, 1994
Page 2
Mr. Schneeman explained that his home is situated on a corner
lot on an interior cul-de-sac in the Park Place neighborhood.
He explained that due to his need to properly contain the
family dog and to satisfactorily enclose his backyard area
which contains gardens, a swing set and compost area, a fence
of 48 inches will be necessary. He noted safety concerns
regarding neighborhood children frequenting his yard to viait
his dog. He further explained that the existing restriction
creates a hardship on the full use of his property that
property owners of other similarly sized lots enjoy.
In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Schneeman
explained that the rose arbor gate will be eight feet in
height with a four foot wide gate. He stated that the color
will be the same as the fence and that he will plant climbing
roses.
In response to a question from Commissioner Koll, Mr.
Schneeman stated that they are constructing the fence around
a blue spruce tree and that they have no specific plans to do
additional landscaping. Commissioner Koll suggested that Mr.
Schneeman consider planting shrubbery to help soften the
appearance of the fence.
Chair Dwyer noted that signatures of consent had been
received.
Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Roll moved to recommend that the City Council
grant a fence height variance to allow a forty-eight inch
(48") fence with an eight foot (S' ) high rose arbor, as -�---�����
proposed on site plans dated October 18, 1994.
CASE NO. 94-32:
HEAVER DESIGN AND CONSTRIICTION -
SIIBDIVISION/LOT LINE ADJIISTD�I�TT
Mr. Keith Heaver, representing Mr. Jay Salmen owner of Lot 3,
Sutcliff Circle, was present to discuss his request for a
subdivision/lot line adjustment which would change lot lines
to accommodate adjustments in the utilities that serve Lots 3
and 2 and building orientation which will allow more rear yard
view orientation for Lot 3. (Mr. Heaver is the owner of Lots
1 and 2, Sutcliff).
,
i a
� ;
�
I
� Planning Commission
� � October 27, 1994
, Page 3
� �
Mr. Heaver explained that with the realignment of the lot
lines, all the lots will still meet the minimums in both lot
size and setback requirements. He explained that the
utilities were originally offset to the west on Lot 3 and the
lot line shift will correct this and line up the utilities
� better.
1 I
Commissioner Tilsen noted that he would not be in favor of any
encroachments, especially the corner lot on Sibley Memorial
�Highway, which will be compressed as a result of the lot line
adjustment. He stated that he does not want to see a variance
request for this corner lot in the future. He further stated
that he does not want to create a hardship situationland that
the developer should conaider this when planning the
' construction of a home. Mr. Heaver responded that the width
of; Lot 1 will be 112 feet. He stated that he does not
� anticipate any problems in placing a house on the footprint of
the lot. I
Commissioner Lorberbaum noted that the desirability of the lot
should be considered and not just the marketability.
� I
Commissioner Friel inquired about the vacation of easements as
, a result of the lot line adjustment. Mr. Heaver stated that
new easements of five feet on each side of the property line
- will be created. Commissioner Friel noted that the drainage
and utility easements should be clarified on the map prior to
! Ci�y Council review.
Chair Dwyer stated that all signatures of consent have been
received. ,I
�
Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing.
, Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
1
I AYSS : 7 "
� NAYS : 0
i
, Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend that the City Council
� grant the subdivision/lot line adjustment as �equested
conditioned that the proper easements be provided for the new
lots lines.
� Co� issioner Duggan seconded the motion.
; AYES : 7
� NAYS : 0
� #
f
Planning Commission
October 27, 1994
Page 4
HEARING: .
CASS NO. 94-31:
N�I�TDOTA HLIGHTS IINITED CHIIRCH
OF CHRIST -
VARIANCL
Ms. Jeanne Lufkin, representing Mendota Heights Church of
Christ located at 680 Highway 110, was present to discuas a
requeat for a sign variance which would allow an additional
message board to the exiating sign.
Ms . Lufkin stated that they are proposing to add a message
board to this sign so that events at the church can be
publicly noted on the sign. She stated that many churches
have message boards in addition to typical signage.
Commissioner Duggan noted that he drivea by the church daily
and that if the right colors were chosen, the sign would be
more visible from the highway.
Planner Uban explained that the proposed addition to the
church's permanent signage is two by eight feet for sixteen
square feet on two surfaces for a total of thirty-two square
feet. He stated that with these message boards attached to
the existing signage the overall perceived impact on the
neighborhood should be lessened. Planner Uban clarified that
the church has already received a variance on the existing
sign for size.
Commissioner Friel stated that the Ordinance permits a 12
square foot sign in the "R�� District and the church already
has an 80 square foot sign and is now adding another 32 square
feet. He stated that a hardship has not been presented,
although he understands the problem.
Commissioner Friel stated that churches within t�he '�R�� -----��•�
District should have sign standards instead of an ad hoc
approach with variances. He further stated that the City
should focus on revising its sign ordinance.
Chair Dwyer stated that the Dodge Nature Center is the only
abutting property owner and that Dr. Gregory Lee has informed
the City that the Dodge Nature Center is not opposed to the
proposed sign addition.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Tilaen seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
Planning Commiss
October 27, 1994
Page 5
Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend that the City
Council grant the requested sign size variance to allow a
temporary sign (Message Board) of thirty-two square feet, as
proposed.
Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion.
�
' AYES : 6
',NAYS: l, FRILL
HEARING:
CAO 94-05:
�RTSAIISER -
CRITICAL AREA VARIANCE
i
, Mr� Art Werthauser, owner of 1024 Sibley Memorial Hig�
present to discuss his requeat for a Critical Area
which would allow the construction of a wall within f
of�an existing wall with materials consisting of inte
pre-cast concrete (Vers-Lok).
Ch�ir Dwyer explained that Mr. Werthauser received a
Site Plan approval to construct a single family home
Sibley Memorial Highway at the October 4 Council meet
explained that Mr. Werthauser desires to enhance acce�
rear yard with the use of retaining walls. He stated
� proposed wall does not comply with some of the
standards for retaining walls as stated in Section 2.
the Critical Area Ordinance. He explained that accc
the Ordinance, retaining walls are required to be sep�
twenty feet (20').
� Ch� ir Dwyer stated that the Planning Commission is
I with only reviewing the request for the Critic
, Variance. He further stated that apparently the
property line dispute between Mr. Werthauser and his
and that the Planning Commission should not be inv
, this matter.
a
i
Mr: Werthauser explained that his home is being place
' hillside and that retaining walls are needed. He st�
� his property slopea from east to west. Werthauser e
; that the home will be twelve feet (12') above the
which allows for a better view of the bluff and that t
will be high enough so he will not have to look
retaining walls on Victoria. He stated the house wi
the same elevation as the house to the east. He
; explained that this property was originally owned b
; and that they gouged the area out when fill was need
ray, was
ariance
�ur feet
locking
Kodified
at 1024
ing. He
�s to his
that the
existing
5A(5) of
rding to
rated by
charged
l Area
e is a
eighbor
lved in
. on the
ed that
plained
oadside
.e house
at the
1 be at
further
Shiely
.._�� ,.
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 6
Mr. Werthauser submitted pictures of the retaining wall to the
Planning Commission. He stated that by constructing the
second wall, this will allow for removal of snow, handicap
access and mowing.
Commissioner Tilsen stated he had visited the site and noted
there were six trucks hauling in material. He inquired how
much material is needed to raise the house. Werthauser
responded approximately 1,200 cubic yards. Tilsen inquired if
a grading permit is needed. Public Works Director Danielson
stated yes.
Tilsen noted his concerns for drainage. He inquired if the
walls are being constructed within the natural drainage area.
Public Works Director Danielson stated no. Tilsen noted his
concern for the Critical Area bluffline. He stated that there
will quite a few trees removed. Werthauser responded that
most of the trees are diseased and are also scrub treea. He
further stated that he intends on replacing trees. Tilsen
inquired if there are any other options other than
constructing a second wall. He stated the house could be
lowered which will require less fill. He noted that this
would then lessen the view.
Commissioner Duggan stated he visited the site and that he
questions the concept of how well the view is from thi� site.
He stated that he could only see condominiums and a water
tower. He stated that by raising the house four feet, a
better view is not being accomplished. He further noted his
concern for drainage. He stated that the neighbors to the
west have informed the City that they had water problems until
drain tile was installed. Mr. Werthauser responded that all
of the drainage from his property will flow down his property
line. Werthauser stated that the retaining wall is located
two feet from his property line.
_ ...-.�_:..
Duggan stated that the second wall will be four feet back from
the first and three feet high. He stated that there will be
another four feet to the garage. He stated that with the two
walls there will be a drop of twelve feet (12') plus the
garage wall. He stated that this will be a severe wall to
look at . Commissioner Duggan stated that according to the
Critical Area Ordinance, "the need for a variance should not
be created by the applicant's design solution°.
Duggan suggested that evergreen trees are needed between the
wall and garage. He atated that with this suggestion, there
would no longer be a pathway. He further stated that the
submittal of a landscape plan is required by the Critical Area
Ordinance and that he had not seen a plan.
� ;
�
' Planning Commiss'
� , October 25, 1994I
� Page 7
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated she had visited the
that she is concerned a.bout changing the cont
drainage. She inquired if the retaining wall will c
drainage and if so, where will the drainage go. S
that the neighbor�s yard is level and there was a 1
near the wall area. Planner Uban responded the natu
is from the east to west and that the water comes a
property to the west . He stated that with the constx
tlie house, the drainage will be directed around the
wa�ll. He stated the overall drainage amount will n
but will be concentrated around the retaining wall.
there will be minima.l impact with water. He furth
that the muddy condition could have been created
construction of the house and that erosion control
sYiould have been done. Mr. Werthauser stated t�
should not be mud.
I
,
In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej
Uban stated that the Ordinance allows a setback of
(2,') from the property line. He stated that this re
is more than a fence setback requirement but less
dr�iveway setback requirement. Commissioner Betlej ;
concerns for drainage with the possibility c
accumulation near the wall area. He further st�
procedurally, this process appears to be handled in
and with the substantial grading taking place, th:
ha've triggered Planning Commission review prior
bu�lding permit.
Commissioner Koll stated the Critical Area Ordinanc
that natural stone and wood are the allowable materi
stated that over the years, ma.terials have been impro
inquired about the aesthetic value of poured concrE
verses boulder and wood retaining walls. She further
if; the Commission should be concerned, when referei
Critical Area Ordinance, in monitoring aesthetic
engineered value. Planner Uban responded that stone
la"rge boulder walls need concrete footings . He expla
wood walls tend to rot. He stated that the integrii
bluffline ma.y be more important. He further stated
new wall systems such as inter-locking decorative bl�
some aesthetic appeal. He further stated that these�
beistepped or terraced and include landscaping. F
that these new wall systems have a longer life span
they are better engineered. Chair Dwyer stated t
several walls similar to this request on Mendota Heig:
Planner Uban stated that retaining walls do help
slopes.
site and
�urs and
.ange the
e stated
t of mud
�al slope
ross the
.ction of
�t change
3e stated
:r stated
with the
measures
at there
Planner
two feet
�uirement
than the
ioted his
f water
ted that
:orrectly
s should
to the
e states
�ls . She
red . She
te walls
inquired
cing the
Talue or
ral 1 s and
.ned that
y of the
that the
�cks have
ralls can
� stated
and that
zere are
�ts Road.
control
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 8
Commissioner Koll stated that the original rationale behind
the ordinance was to use natural materials. She stated that
the new concrete systems can be used to look natural. Roll
further noted her concerng with the amount of fill and
potential drainage problems.
Mr. Werthauser stated with the construction of his home, there
will be two homes on six acres in this area. He stated there
is not a lot of runoff and that a lot of the drainage will be
absorbed. He stated the water will go down hill to the
highway storm sewer system. Commissioner Friel stated Mr.
Werthauser has a steep lot and that he is proposing to replace
the absorption with a driveway, house and swimming pool.
Planner Uban atated that he was requested to review the
variance request for a second retaining wall. He stated that
with the construction of the second retaining wall, the
drainage will not be changed but re-routed. He stated that he
did not review the drainage as it had already been approved
when City Council approved the house construction.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. and Mrs. Moore, 1028 Sibley Memorial Highway, submitted
pictures of Mr. Werthauser's first wall to the Commission.
Chair Dwyer acknowledged receipt of a letter from Mr. and Mrs .
Moore. Mr. Moore stated the Council ma.de a mistake in
approving the building permit. He stated he would prefer no
building on thia site. Commissioner Tilsen stated there has
been a building permit issued and that Mr. Werthauser has a
right to construct the one retaining wall. Tilsen inquired
what Mr. Werthauser would prefer, two retaining walls or one
which would lower the elevation of the houae. Mr. Moore
inquired why the house cannot be lowered. He further atated
he would like to see additional landscaping.
Commissioner Duggan noted that according to tn�- plans
submitted, there appear� to be a significant amount of woods.
He sta�ed that after grading the woods only exist on the east
edge of the property.
Commissioner Duggan inquired if Mr. Werthauser is using his
neighbor's property to drain. Public Works Director Danielson
stated that the conditions previous to construction of the
house still exist. He stated that the contours on the map
show a pre-existing low area. Mr. Moore stated there is
standing water in his backyard. Commissioner Duggan suggested
that maybe the existing drainage pipe does not work. Chair
Dwyer stated that the proposal/issue is the retaining wall and
that the Commission can express dissatisfaction with the City
Council preempting their review.
-..... �..
� 3
� ' Planning Commiss:
� ' October 25, 1994
� ! Page 9
� �
. Mrs. Moore inquired if Mr. Werthauser needs to z
pe'rmit for hauling dirt. Commissioner Tilsen stated
City Council will need to address this issue. N!x
inquired if the marketability of her house �
j eopardized with the construction of the retaining wa
stated that the walls are nice looking.
�
Mr. Max Hill, neighbor to the west, noted his cor
drainage coming across the Moore's property to his �
stated there has been water in his basement since �
installed the pond. He further stated he does no
problem with the second wall.
' Public Works Director Danielson stated that if th
problem, the City will work with Mr. Werthauser. N!�
stated there were some water problems in 1985 and s:
time, drain tile has been installed and they :
' experienced any problems.
Co� issioner Duggan moved to close the public hearii
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
�
A7tLS : 7
NAYS: 0
� Commissioner Friel moved to recommend that the Cit�
' deny the variance request as it does not meet the reqt
set forth in the Critical Area Ordinance - Section
further stated that Mr. Werthauser consider othe
, solutions.
� Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
�
, �
I Commissioner Tilsen stated that the applicant did inc
would correct any drainage problems if created
construction. He further noted that a grading perm�
required by City Council. �
I
on
�ceive a
that the
a . Moore
�uld be
.ls . She
rn f or
�d . He
e City
have a
: is a
Moore
e that
�e not
Council
rements
.4. He
design
cate he
by his
may be
Commissioner Friel amended his motion to suggest that Ithe City
Council consider reviewing the neighborhood issues of drainage
and to further review grading permit issues. Com
Tilsen added that Council consider placing a divers
' along the property line.
� i
� AYES a 7
NAYS: 0
;
' i
HEARINGi
;CASL NO: 94-33:
� GENER.AL � POMP, INC . -
jVARIANCES
i
� �
i
� {
i �
sioner
swale
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 10
Mr. Del Erickson, representing General Pump, Inc. - 1174
Northland Drive, was present to discuss a request for three
variances which would allow the construction of a shared
driveway and adjustment of the driveway to better accommodate
truck turning movements and a sign setback.
Mr. Erickson stated that it was the desire of the City Council
that General Pump construct a shared driveway as General Pump
owns both lots. He further stated that normally the setback
requirement for the truck turnaround area would be ten feet
but the site has frontage on the Interstate 494 and that is
why a variance is needed. He further stated that there will
be berming and landscaping completed for this area. He
further added that a twenty foot (20') sign setback variance
is request, similar to other signs in the business park.
Commissioner Tilsen inquired about the proposed use of the
other lot. Mr. Erickson responded he does not know. He
further stated there will be 35 evergreen placed along the ten
foot setbacke
Chair Dwyer acknowledged receipt of a plan submitted by Mr.
Erickson regarding sign dimensions. Mr. Erickson described
the sign material to be stone aggregate.
In response to a question from Commissioner Friel, Mr.
Erickson stated two lots were purchased by the owners and that
the lot line runs through the center. Commissioner Friel
inquired if there will be easements to control the shared
driveway. He stated that with two separate platted lots, an
easement or dedication .will be required. Planner Uban
concurred. Commissioner Friel stated that this is just the
kind of circumstances that will need variances for undeveloped
lots in the future.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. •�
There was no one present to discuss this request.
Commissioner Tilsen moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
Commissioner
driveway be
granted for
Tilsen stated that with any approval of a shared
predicated upon the fact that no variances be
Lot 4 due to the driveway.
, Commissioner
the fo].lowing
�
Pl.anning Commissian
Oc�ober 25, 1994�
Page 11
Friel. moved to recammend �ha� City Coun �a.1 grant
variances:
1.� A ten foot t10'} driveway setback variance along�I-494 ta
' � allow "bump out" £or truck maneuvering.
,
2.
i
3.
A twenty £oot (2p') �ron�. yard sign �etback
A ten foo� (10') driveway side yard setback va
allow for a common drivewa.y between Lots 3 and
1, Northland Plaza Addition all subject to the
an eaeement or dedication which establi�hes t:
driveway with the understanding that should the a�
, � de�ire to use the o�her parcel, a vacation c
� sough�.
' AYES : ?
NAYS: 0
Ch�ir Dwyer called a recess a� 9:25 o'clock P.M.
Ch�ir Dwyer recanvened the meeting at 9z32 o`clock P,
�
Ct}NT�NIIII�D HBARING:
CASS NO .� 9 4- 2 5:
MENDOTA 80M8S -
REZONING AND
CUP FOR PIID
�
i Mr.� John Mathern, of Mendota Homes, and Mr. Bob F
' Childtime Day Care, were present to di�cuss their reqi
a Rezoning and a Conditional Use Permi� far Plann
� Development which would allow the construc�ian of 36 t<
and' day care �acility at the sou�heast quadrant of
Heights Road and Dodd Road.
� �
Chair Dwyer explained that the Mendota Homes PUD h
before the Planning Commissian previously and h<
. con�inued so that the developer can mak� plan adji
reflecting concerns o� the Planning Commission and
� additional infarma�.ion requested in the orda.nance.
� e�lained that a petition was received by the City f
Bri'dgeview Shores neighborhood in August. He ackn<
� receipt of letter� received from Roxanne Wodarczy
Lockwoacl Drive and Renton Ra.nker, of '782 Pondhav
; regarding Mendota Homes' application.
�
.ance to
6, Block
L1ing of
: shared
>plicant
ould be
�
�rs, of
�est for
�d Unit
�v�rnhomes
Mendota
- ._.-..,�.�.
�s been
�s been
.stments
provide
Dwyer
rom the
�wledged
�, 2593
�n Lane
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 12
Mr. Mathern explained that he is proposing a thirty six
townhome development with one day care facility. He stated
that both he and Childtime Day Care have responded to comments
from the Planning Commission and Planner Uban's report.
Chair Dwyer reviewed the October 24, 1994 report from Planner
Uban regarding the Barton-Aschman traffic report and the
concerns with stacking and turning movement delays. Mr.
Mathern stated that this is not an uncommon traffic situation
and that Barton Aschman is nationally recognized for its
expertise in traffic analysis. Commissioner Duggan inquired
if the driveway could be moved. Mr. Ma.thern responded that
there is some flexibility to move it towards the townhomes.
Commissioner Duggan stated he is concerned that this will
still be inadequate.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan regarding
Barton-Aschman's traffic study and peak hours, Mr. Ma.thern
stated that the identified peak hours, for the day care
traffic, will be 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and from 4:00 P.M. to
6:00 P.M. He stated that Barton-Aschman has indicated 61
trips, per hour, during peak hours. Planner Uban stated that
he questioned Barton-Aschman's analysis and that Barton-
Aschman provided him with an amended analysis. He informed
the Commission that Barton-Aschman's analysis has been amended
to Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation at 97 trips (45 in, 52
out) and Morning Peak Hour at 96 trips (52 in, 44 out).
Planner Uban stated that these revised numbers do not change
the perception of a traffic problem.
In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej, Planner
Uban stated�that some of these trips include people already
using the roadways. Commissioner Betlej stated that there may
be a heavier traffic situati.on with the commercial trade area
to the south of the day care. Planner Uban stated that people
like to have their day care near their home and no'� their �--- �
work.
Commissioner Duggan stated the Commission should focus on the
number of trips generated by the day care. In response to a
question from Chair Dwyer, Planner Uban stated that there
would be 100 cars in and out of the day care in peak period.
He stated that peak hour periods are identified as two hours.
He explained that when the traffic number is doubled, it is
assumed that that number is split over each hour.
In-response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Planner
Uban stated there are 26 parking stalls. Commissioner Duggan
inquired if there is a formula for calculating parking.
Duggan noted his concern for not enough parking as parents
Planning Commiss
October 25, 1994
Page 13
' will be escorting their children into the building ai
peak hours, with one child every minute being escox
� the building, there will be traffic congestion with
parking stalls available. Planner Uban stated that r
� all staff inembers will be at the day care during pe
: and therefore more parking will be available. Comn
Duggan stated that Mendota Heights Road is a dangerou:
and that it is not a nice crossing as it exists now.
Mr� Ma.thern stated that Childtime Day Care and Bartc
' have analyzed the traffic, signal lights and park:
stated that there are a few variables in the analysis
Ba'rton-Ashman did not specifically focus on the intex
In;response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Ma.the�
there will be three lanes into the day care and two 1�
Heistated that he feels the proposed number of lane
out is reasonable and that movement through the inte
will work. Chair Dwyer stated that he travels thr
Mendota Heights Road/Dodd Road intersection daily anc
� is�an unpleasant intersection. He stated that he
have'a lot of confidence in Barton-Ashman's report.
Commissioner Friel stated that he has difficulty �
Ba'r,ton-Ashman analysis. He inquired how to di�
between the percentage of traffic already on the stree
�� and the percentage generated by the immediate area
� atated with only 285 feet established for stacking, tY
� be ;stacking in the parking lot also. Planner Uban st�
' no matter how many people leave the day care, stackir.
same. Planner Uban stated that the sequence of light
r miriutes and that most people will be going left to I-
, stated that people will be leaving the day care and
� the stream in its sequence. He stated to leave the
; may only take 30 seconds and as Barton-Ashman is re
the stacking'problem does not seem severe. He statec
; will not know until the signal lights are installed.
�
Commissioner Friel stated that fifty percent more
will stack into the parking lot. He further stated
does not believe that there is less density in the s
area than originally planned.
;
Commissioner Duggan briefly discussed a 1993 report fx
j estimating the number of trips for one hour to be :
� stated that is a twenty five percent increase, v
i substantial. He stated that since 1993, there has b
+ units constructed on Mendota Heights Road and
I additional 36 townhomes and a day care, the traffic
� will be substantial. Planner Uban responded that
j these trips exist today and that the Barton-Ashman r
l during
ed into
only il
.ybe not
k hours
ssioner
roadway
n-Ashman
,ng . He
and that
section.
n stated
nes out.
s in and
rsection
�ugh the
that it
ioes not
iith the
tinguish
t system
Friel
ere will
ted that
g is the
s is two
494. He
j oining
iay care
�orting,
that we
�ehicles
that he
utheast
�m MnDOT
00. He
hich is
�en more
�ith an
.ncrease
some of
:port
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 14
discounts this and assumes the worse case scenario. Uban
stated that there will not be a 25 percent increase in
traffic, that the increase will be in circulation with the
left turns being increased. In response to a question from
Chair Dwyer, Uban stated there will be an increase in
congestion and that Barton-Ashman's report indicates it will
be manageable.
Chair Dwyer stated that an additional market analysis summary
was submitted. He stated that the ChildTime, Inc. had denied
review of the full market study as it is considered
proprietary information. He stated that the City needs
assurance the market is viable to maintain the day care's
occupancy.
Mr. Fors submitted background information from the 1990
Census. He indicated the main market in 1990 was over 340
children under the age of five and that 80 percent of adults
in the community have Bachelor's Degree. He stated the City
has highly educated people with families. He stated there is
well over 400 children, now, under the age of five. He stated
the day care would have difficulty serving a large area as the
demand would be too great. Commissioner Duggan stated that by
the year 2000, those children will be over 12 years old and
then the day care's demographics will no longer be there. Mr.
Fors responded the School District projects a continued growth
in family. Commissioner Duggan stated he disputes the School
District' projections and that the number of children under
five will not always be there.
Mr. Mathern stated that he believes people will like the site
and that the market is viable for this type of facility. He
stated that Childtime feels the market is reliable.
Commissioner Tilsen acknowledged receipt of information
submitted by Jackie Easton, Bridgeview Shores r�e�ident, �--�-�
regarding other day care facilities in the area.
In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Mr.
Fors stated that Bright Start's capacity only allows for SO
children and that they do not provide full service meals. He
stated that Childtime will be a larger facility with more
services available.
Commissioner Lorberbaum stated that if 13 parking spaces are
available and during the winter time parents are undressing
toddlers for about fifteen minutes, there could be only 52
people parking in an hour. She inquired how 100 arrivals
will be handled. Mr. Fors stated that he believes the
assumptions on the amount of time is inadequate. He further
i �
�
; �
i �
�
!
± Planning Commiss
i + October 25, 1994
� � Page 15
� t
stated that other day care facilities similar to �
; offer less parking than what is proposed at this si
Chair Dwyer stated that some information has been
� regarding financial viability of Mendota Homes. Conn
7 Betlej stated that if Mendota Homes intends to take
land with cash and close on it, Mendota Homes' bala�
' does not give the appearance that this is feasib
' Mathern responded that he is in the process of app:
construction loans and that at the time of final appr
financing becomes final. He further stated that at
, of� final platting, the project will move forward
Putnam will convey the property to Mendota Homes. H�
� stated that with public street improvements, assessm
be;charged against each property.
{ CoJ issioner Betlej inquired about how many project;
Homes is currently developing. Mr. Mathern respor
there are two projects currently underway, one in In�
; which is thirty percent complete and the other in ]
� He'stated that the Mendota Heights project will be tl
project. Mathern further indicated that he will fu:�
City with letters of credit for grading and landsca�
ldtime
e.
.issioner
down the
ce sheet
.e. Nlr.
ying f or
�val, the
the time
and Mr.
further
nts will
Mendota
3ed that
�er Grove
ilydale.
eir next
nish the
ing.
In�response to a question from Commissioner Betlej regarding
rising interest rates, Mr. Mathern stated that most buyers of
these townhomes are on their third or fourth home. He stated
that these people have equity within the community and that
they sometimes put 100 percent down on their new hoie.
Chair Dwyer briefly summarized the development schedule as
submitted by Mr. Mathern. He stated that development may
commence in January of 1995 with completion in 1996. He
further indicated that the day care hopes to begin operation
as:early as 1995. I
,
In�response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Fors :
is'Childtime's intention to purchase the property
Putnam.
�
In�regards to the revised grading plan submitted, Comn
Tilsen stated that some softening has been included
he;would like to see more. He stated he would like t<
swales softened by 1/2 percent and that the driv�
flattened. Mr. Ma.thern stated he has no difficu:
accommodating the grade changes as suggested by Comn
Tilsen. Tilsen further stated that he would like tc
units tucked more into the rear of the property whi
create more natural berming along the freeway. He
stated that the landscape plan shows the driveways d
than the grading plan. Mr. Mathern responded that t
ted it �--?`-=-•
�m Mr .
Lssioner
�ut that
see the
ways be
ty with
Lssioner
see the
:h would
further
_fferent
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 16
landscape plan is only a concept and that the intention was to
provide information regarding numbers and types of trees.
Commissioner Tilsen stated the plan has improved but that he
would like to see everything lowered so there is a berming
effect along the freeway.
In response to a question from Chair Dwyer regarding drainage.
Mr. Mathern stated that berming along Mendota Heights Road may
cause a drainage problem. He stated that more trees than
berming may help the situation. He stated that his first
priority in developing the plans was to include backyard
space. He further stated that people interested in these
types of townhomes do not want steps . He stated that he would
like to include backyard space without grades caused by
berming. Commissioner Tilsen stated the question is whether
or not walkouts or berming is wanted. Mr. Mathern responded
that there is no reason for units to be walkout and that he
can eliminate this idea with no problem. He stated that Lots
5, 6 7 and 8 could be non-walkout and Lots 1, 2 3 and 4 berm
could be extended along Mendota Heights Road.
In regards to the landscaping of the daycare, Mr. Mathern
stated the daycare will be landscaped. He further stated the
building has been moved to save some trees . He further stated
there will some lower plantinga around the exterior of the
building and fence area. He stated that visibility is a key
factor when landscaping a day care facility.
Chair Dwyer inquired if the City Attorney has reviewed the
Homeowner's Association documents.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Mathern stated the play area will be located south and west of
the building. Duggan responded that some of the property is
sloped in the southwest corner. Mathern stated that a�ea will ��--?=
have to be fenced and can be modified to accommodate the
sloped area.
Mr. Mathern briefly explained the number of trees which will
be removed and replaced. He indicated that 17 trees will be
destroyed and that some will be moved to be saved. He further
stated that the backdrop trees will likely be saved and that
the building area trees will be lost. Commissioner Duggan
stated that there will be significant changes in the area and
that a great effort in landscaping should be accomplished. He
stated the replacement of trees should be monitored.
� Chair Dwyer stated that stree
changed. Mr. Mathern stated
appropriate. He explained that t
lines on the western access.
� access is pointed at the side of L
� the north side of the street.
Planning Commiss.
October 25, 1994
Page 17
t locations have
that street locat
he exits are at the
He stated that the
ot 5 with full pla;
Coinmissioner Tilsen inquired if a full service da�
needed in the City. He stated that the availabilit�
; care within the City should be valued. He further in
the City wants to encourage home care providers. He
�, if�15 staff inembers for 177 children is a direction
wants to pursue.
� Pl'anner Uban explained that for comparative infornu
' noted the impact on density if the 10,000 square
average is met and if the 25 percent impervious si
me't. (Density allow 33.5 lots and 30 units are a:
the requirements for 25 percent impervious ;
Commissioner Duggan briefly reviewed the calculat
density. He stated that the maximum is 33.5 and not
on� density.
Commiasioner Friel that the calculations for ii
, surface comes up dif ferent . He stated that the 2�
requirement is a hard number that neither the
Commission or City Council can grant a variance tc
Dwyer stated that Mr. Mathern is aware of this requir
per the October 12, 1994 letter from Mr. Mathern,
despite the plan being good, it does exceed the ii
surface requirement. Commissioner Friel stated thai
a variance were juatified, no hardship has been p�
' Friel further noted that the corrections to th
Planning Commission minutes include that Mr. Mather�
� the Commission with information on the underlying su}
variances. Mr. Mathern inquired if the City Cou
` Planning Commission have no authority to grant a va�
increase the units to 36. He inquired if this wa
"stone". He stated that he would not be wasting evE
time if he had been aware of this. Commission
responded that there is no authority to grant a
according to Section 22 of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr
; stated he does not have the ability to reduce the ir
surface .
I �
� Commissioner Tilsen stated that a fifty five foot (55
iof;way ma.y allow some gain in land. Mr. Mathern inc
, this would work in his favor. Planner Uban respondE
� �
�
1
!
i
�
on
iot been
_ons are
property
eastern
itings on
care is
of home
�uired if
inquired
the City
tion, he
°oot lot
rface is
lowed by
urface) .
.ons for
6, based
�ervious
percent
Chair
ment, as
and the
?ervious
even i f
asented.
August
provide
iivision
.cil and
tance to
set in
�ybody' s
r Friel
rariance
Mathern
�ervious
right-
red if
yes.
.._� .,
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 18
Mr. Mathern explained that he is providing heavy landscaping
with underground irrigation. He stated that he is providing
one level units which use up land with large footprints which
are marketable. He stated that he would like 36 units and he
believes that this makes good use of this site. Commissioner
Friel inquired if there is an economic advantage in keeping
the development at 36 units. Mr. Mathern stated yes.
Chair Dwyer opened the meeting to the public. _
Mr. Kent Rinker, 782 Pondhaven, apologize for his late
delivery of his letter dated October 21, 1994. Rinker stated
that the language within Sections 22.iB, 22.3(1) and 22.3(6)e
are clear in that a variance is not allowed. He stated that
even if a variance is allowed, it is not a five percent
variance but a twenty percent variance. He further stated
that according to Sections 22.1, 22.2 and 22.3(6)f, a density
variance is prohibited for financial benefit. Rinker further
inquired if there is really 10 acres of land. He further
stated that Section 22.ib clearly states that PUD should
consist of entirely residential, therefore a day care cannot
be considered. He stated that another variance would need to
be granted.
Rinker stated that evidence of financial status has not been
accurately met. He stated that the traffic report assumptions
are questionable. He further stated that according to the
Subdivision Control Ordinance land dedication or cash
dedication be submitted. He stated that the day care site
equals 10 percent of the site and that that site could remain
open and serve as the park dedication.
Mr. Kenneth Severson, 2496 Westview Terrace, stated he
conducted a two hour survey of traffic on Mendota Heights
Road. He stated he counted 525 cars in two hours. He noted
his concerns for increased traffic. --- �--��r
Ms. Jana Patrick, 2536 Arbor Court, stated that Bright Start
has problems with parking and that they offer different types
of programs on a regular basis. She further inquired if
Childtime's report include stay at home children. She stated
she would like to see single family homes constructed on this
property. She stated this would generate less traffic.
Commissioner Duggan inquired if there are parking restrictions
enforced on Mendota Heights Road. Public Works Director
Danielson responded not at this time. He further stated that
a no parking zone should be considered with the construction
of a new left turn lane.
� i Planning Commiss:
� ; October 25, 1994
� � Page 19
, � .
� Ms�. Jackie Easton, Bridgeview Shore resident,
information she submitted regarding day care faciliti
� area. She commented that Visitation is the only
� facility with no openings. She further discussed
� Metro II site which serves as Extended Day for Kinde�
� from ISD No. 197. She further stated that therE
� individual day care providers in the area, which
! he'rself. She stated that cars come at scattered tim�
� at;the same time. She further stated that Childtime
� research the use of Nanny's in the area.
,
� Mr'. Mike Dumer, Arbor Court, stated he does not war.
the day care with the townhouses. He further statec
� feels that people buying the townhouses would not wa�
heavily trafficked day care next to their place of re
� He� further stated that the City should review f
' statements more thoroughly.
i .
' Mr? Doug Rickert, 550 Abbey Way, stated that the
report does not include traffic from throughout the
stated that there are at least 300 cars between the
9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. He further noted his con
sight distances. He noted his concerns for families :
related to traffic increase. He noted his concerns
developer's financial ability in completing the work
, �
Commissioner Tilsen moved to close the public hearir.
� 1
Ms� Easton inquired if emergency vehicles would hav
� access in and out. Mr. Mathern stated the fire marsk
� review this information.
� ,
�
, ,
' Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion.
�
,AYSS: 7
NAYS: 0 -
Co� issioner Friel moved to recommend that the City
deny the rezoning request from R-1 to MR-PUD. He sta
, it;is unnecessary to rezone as all the applicant :
accomplish can be accomplished by proceeding as a P�
� Section 22 of the Ordinance and that application for a
a PUD is before the City.
I
;
� Commissioner Frie l fur t her move d to recommen d denia:
CUP for PUD because based on the record before the
� will adversely affect the public health safety and wel
is,not in compliance with the PUD Ordinance Section 2
�, following specific requests:
reviewed
�s in the
3ay care
the new
gartners
are 12
includes
s or all
did not
to see
that he
a loud
... j .
ial
traffic
�ay . He
�ours of
ern f or
�fety as
�ith the
enough
would
Council
:ed that
eeks to
rD under
CUP f or
. of the
City it
Eare and
� in the
Planning Commission
October 25, 1994
Page 20
a. It fails to meet the impervious surface requirements of
Section 22 and in fact exceeds them by 20 percent
(22.1B) .
b. It fails to meet the density requirements of Section 22
utilizing for that purpose the calculation process of
Section 22.3 (3) and applying the NIlt-PUD requirement of
not more than four units per calculated acre.
c. Even assuming that a variance from the impervious surface
requirements and/or the density requirements of Section
22 was permitted, the applicant has presented no evidence
of hardship and in fact has advised the Planning
Commission that his failure to meet those requirements is
entirely for the economic advantage of additional units
which our Ordinance clearly indicates is not a
justification for variance.
d. It is the finding of the Planning Commission based on the
evidence before it that the traffic generated by a
proposed day care center to serve 117 children and the
proximity of its entrance to Highway 149 is inconsistent
with the maintenance of public safety and health at the
intersection of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road, and
in fact creates a public safety problem.
e. There is a clear lack of any hard evidence before the
Planning Commission to support the requirement of Section
22 that adequate funding is available to the applicants
to complete the project.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 7
NAYS: 0
- -- ..-.�.:..
DISCIISS ORDINANCL RLVISIONS
DLTACHED GARAGES AND STADIIIMS
IN R-1
Due to the lateness of the meeting, the Commission continued
this discussion to their November meeting.
VERBAL REVIEW
Public Works Director Danielson informed the Commission of
City Council action on previous planning cases.
,
1
� Planning Commiss
October 25, 1994
� � Page 21
I
ADJOIIRNMENT
! There being no further business, the Planning Commiss
to'adjourn its meeting at 11:52 o'clock P.M.
�' Respectfully submitted,
� _
�
Rimberlee R. Blaeser
� Sen.ior Secretary
I �
i
. ,
, I
moved
_�
i
1
�
;
LIST�OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCI:
November 1, 1994
, 1
i
iMasonryfiContractor License
Killian'Masonry & Concrete
Excavation Coatractor License
Engstrom Excavating Inc.
Fischer,Stapf Construction Inc.
I
�General�Contractors Licease
'D & B Construction
Patio Town
�
, ;
!
,Gas PipinQ Coatractor License
Del Air i Inc .
� ':
�
,
SVAC Contractors License
Spriggs,Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc.
�Del Air Inc.
; i
' Rubbish�Haulers License
Aagard Environmental Services
. � .�� .
a�f�i�Y.,',�'<;.: ��. ;���'�`+' - � � '' �
' uo.•.1: .
�L' �S}�� Y �:'JG''y, "J:�t'�:y�'r :.i..z:�.. 1j'•:' .A`.;�:..'�� . � •
; y+�i�'�r,'�"�.,,��N� . CiG�:�l:C, ,?':"...z{.• . e.t'+,:o. .
':�;:.. e,� :�i% `:�j: �'.l , _ `r � ' .
�,4� d . ,
; �,:: -
,.%4:'•' R . -
.�
�.k:'i� .
'!� V . .
. . =1
. �Y:. iij•.is:ji "J�. . _ � • . .
. • r°.;�;�::�:::°�;,- - , _ � NQvember 1, 1994
:�;��:: Kr�.�;:,�;,r.:' . • • . . '.. � .. � .
' ��N:,�;S:: .�.;� .
:%i' . 'a � . ';'£'e ' :•p =,.�.°: '�,y: `. " , , .
: : : �c ;j1y..ty;.: �.,i{;.'. .
:. .�.:_ . ; ; . • 7(ry-'J;".:_,
� ; �; ;,;r4; �. �'i, i? `f;;•�•;'�:;:.. : .
� • �' i�'�� F'• 'i3.•1 s" .��:•. : .�t� •.: ;�: ' � ' �
:�..�<•:� :;<.<' _.._. ___.__ .�=_Mayor and City Co�nctl _ �_.� �
... • ' ' � :z✓'. � -- .. .- _ . : , , . ..: ,-. ....I
,, - . � I
... . .S,'3.: , ' ' '
'":`;'. ` ., r •
isi_•,��."• i�:'- ' .. , • . .
::�� ".s�- . �• � S ; -, i;• • , :r:. " �- . �
�.�'�^�:''•C- ' �`��,, �'v;� �-� . . � ` j.
� „`uy:>/:; '� �?;� .i;:, .
Y'�3:� .ts-• ::t:' = fi,{:- '.. ::�
y� ':s•• ;''y�.i;:•"<; F,:.:'�^.t'-;; `'.-..
v,. . �i5�i!H'1�11i:�;• �:.':i'.. .. 2..1`:'i� iir't'`, rii'4•,'+: >�:e: �:yt r : a.hy � .. ( : ri � �
r� C �'.i� : :��: y`�,-�-'Ay't t �i�`0`i+.1��••!i ,;: �{��S 'f :+ , •�i, � ,u'�h': �`� ��".' �
'�, " S � �� :�'' {�:::'i+��:� 7 a�F f'� ?�,�5 y ��s.,.
��ff ;� �,; � 1r.,3� �+ ',� ;i� �;;�`��r
: �.� �� '"•.�•= ^� `t l;�,';`�x'!%�i;��`��,.,'�i::;'4ii:i;��.' ...�'.�; '{'•d'.2;�:Til .�" �r 3i��'�� G:•: •.�
.l? ',^;E' ii �.(4"�Z'�'>t'..!�'":'6'��y'�".`�: •k, .
'•k.;y;G�. � k;:,�r.. ; � fiFii�iii:%il:'s• .g:" �' �' ",�;�;:';.,•ry.. rF. :;; �4:; �.'.1 ' ,.
r . r.9r� 'u ' ii .b( .. ::i;;.t '.i ,Y,.. ;n•.'e"..:ti44°�f^�S��K�';�"'�'�i?�
:�i• �.i���: - ; � •, .. ..':s.''� �.
, ' �-1;,r: '�:: . `:�;�.•:''... �.t:. . •':.:,: ;��M1�� ',,.•
' .! +�y - �`^: :>�i�.:{.��;�:�;�'rY.2=til�'�:�;
: �_� .n• ::i::::.:
. .��`� . ��'�± .
`,�: :, � . ��;'`�:''�'�;+'.`.:.. `:;
� ::�:� ,� j ' ' �� �• � s:::.,;,:.��:';:�•.:_` _'
�:�3-;� ``:.i, r `�:i;.; .;,�.::;�;,.,_:,,::;,,;-;. ::+;3.
.. r`I�_: 'i�: C%;'�4r�l� _ '.>%:'`:'%' 5,.;...;.�.. c�. ,,���.r.,..; ;:s,.,
. i<• ��sif,' a. c3�;j; ``;� 3's;<:::'� ;:c:: l?;, 1t.i.f •..,{t,".�;,'�i3;.�` :%':::::;
;'�•
;s'*" . ,, �, ,••�. .. . - • s�:;€�=:�.-:.:>'�'�?':: z�.;.. .�.:
; �,.;�;. :y:k;, . :i � �. �` - ..r,:�,,:;�:.}.',q'�...v: .'=�'''
"a::f•.!r•• •�f^'G, i�' �:y,'.�:�.:�:•:"'>;t:'�'�y�,'•.�.%?�'c%<i•:
' :� `J;�.,,t;.y � ?,z'��'f `k> ' , , : 5� .... 'yy ,,..a,
�:3`�-.:�• �?'S'r ,y.i:` .{�f�.; ':i� .. ; ;s^�.:.�?,�'••3:f•t?�iw�1;n,:�y'�A, 3�,:�:
,�:� 3� ' '.'t: •:7.: } -di.r�,.{. �Y::i : "'y�3:'�.^,� ��'�S�{;f ; •"� :
+ ;• c�,i,s. � . t - . ii : �'+` : s �. . 3'':^,S�c
•.`1' • 7.�.
=x1:yi:',��`.�3js_ 'iti� ": � . ,:.k.�: •�:` - � • . . - . 7c .. •
h:�;.` ; ti;..�, }.}�. ' , _ .. .^.�s.�= �:�':'_,
'�'5�4�:ri� �*;��. V✓ti? ����' `�TS:..' ' .
i � f.`� _ �ti �• •� ~•� )r���'�•'•,:�• • a . ',<•.` . .
. ';' �,•'. S-�•��.'�••'• .
�.� , -�,,�.;- • , .. •-
:'a' - , . �:�~;:�::Ys..�' . •, . . �
. ' :�,k:�s�:�';>�;. .. . .
� ' ` . Z,.; ,: 2,•• �,., : .
: � . •�•;:�.•. ;:;- .
.S•�;' : ,,7, `:•ri+t�'r'z:�-: . :.- .... . � .
,�. .:;n "� ` � s� i•``.5H' < ;y;� �,� .:,�: • :�i, •�:'•' �;� •�
� �� . ;\;
• �" " �;'.. . •1 . � .,Y.,. `hk..: .h.. �;c�....
. jE�.•..
• � , � ' {�."`�-��Q�'',�.',^�� `�' " . . . .. ,. - r _ . .. , I
:f . .. ' f't:��:�r::Yi�y. , � • � ' � � . � I
.. � ' • Y'....�: �: +���^. Y � ' � " �
���,,'� �=:ai-� � _ .. �=?;{r'�.�Ek. ., - . _ . : , f _
' �?:��. s' ' r``" . . - - .. . . - '. ' . . .
.;;,••,ra . :;�:: , . : , '
� ��. � . �Y: • , '�2� , , .. . . . .
;i?K,+.����n,i.i;:,�:.,. i , , , . .
� � ".��w.'��,+,�".', �,�'�:i+.�'.' �i�+�,+e� • ; . . ^ , . . .
'r, �4'i':'�:. •s "� ' � :%];,i . . . , .
.�lK .�+v':�'` .," .r'`�"G: ' . . _ . .
's.:y��_:r.: ....._ ...:%:;....,. �' `s:'s'r;i.... . .. . _ . ._-�,... . . . __. ..... . .. _..�. . . _ . 'i
�; Yi�' �,'Sy± -; y.�:. ' ;,I '::?;;'SS,; , .. � _ _ . �.e, � i-• : ' � " i
^a�S; �'+��:�: ¢�t' ' , . . ` '; ... .. • _ w . i ,
�`��:rf;:A};�i;.:" ;;�•'.k :�`v: ^'�'� :'C. , �
';';,'`•:� i � G,-•y`:f : ' ..,�py'c � %"�:� •tX'•"t.%i%?,.SS?' : j : j
.i:Yj )e ^i�ii «,?� : q.. :::�,tic!: w ...1a.. :'i:;�. �r`e; y �` ~ : �?> . I
,.;1,. 'ti;l .�',� ��'I.. ::�;.` ,€.�: �.,r
t•�t; • �'��;, : %�y �'v �
:,z�`•` r �Y� s ..� � `3'' '���•'
'�ti' `." :4' ..�<:<.,-:;`+i:;'+'c. •:cy{��Yr•%°`k:il'i;: "r �':Y;
p .�::', j . �.;�' +a� �YCC�
:,`'S'` ..r2 ! ��.t,r.�:., + _
:itl�'.,'tj�?r: ^.:h'• i �v ':;K :. � µ'�'�.�;:,�i't>"�i..�a �,� �' �' � '
�r:+r.���..-+-.'..r`::a+i+:�i= �;ii!•%'.�...ti.r•'r:�++.i.H1�:�'i2..:...:� •,,. h �'ti��� �,••�...d.... `�!r
. . . _ � . ,.,�� � .Ky'wr�;�.��'-�--�=;}ti-'-.�+rF1+1-1?� w�.. .�„ �'�'1�. i'�.:+`
• . . . �• ,. � . . . . • . , .......,.... . . .. `'` .. ,.
CLAIMS ISST 571M1NARY:
�pt,�zz. cz�s
Signif3cant C2aimc
Med Centers
MWCC
NSP
�/4T:$�G1 4.iOJJYS
Blaeser Landscapnng
John Du Bois
Guy Engr
Health ina
sewer
utilities
Tree planting
Pentel
Pentel
122,557
11,642
60,738
4,245
13,284
2,437
2,500
(•l =d ucti 1 4 I1/ 1/ y4 � 1� x ri�s L � st Uept 10-Adm Dept 50-ROdds F'aoe 1 �
Fri 3:� City af hienciota Hei� 15-Engt' 60-Utilities �
20-Police 70-Park
ti: � Ternp Check Number i 30-Fire � 80-Planning �-
, 40-CEO 85-Recycling
Temp.---- — � - - . � � 90-Animal Control - --- - - - �—
� Check .
N�unber Vendor• Narne Account Code Carnrnents Amo�int �
� 1 Earl F Anciersun & Assoc 01-4305-070-70 • splys z62_99 �
_ 1 262.93____�
� Totals Ternp� Check Number � 1 � � ^ � ` � ` � - - - " � � ' i � � _ ` �
Temp Check IVumber 2
�-? 2 AT&T 01-421@-@5@-50 act/nav svc �1. m,�, n
2 AT&T @1-4210-070-70 act/nov svc �1.@5
-� P AT&T 15-4210-Q60-60 oct/n�v svc 21.06 �
� 2 AT&T 01-42i0-050-5@ 4th qtr 14.62
�'1 8 77. 78
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 2 �
<<F Temp Check Number 3
r• �
3 A R C Rentals @1-420@-61@-50 eq'rental 38.88
� 3 ' 38.88 �
Totals Temp Check Number 3
� Ternp Check Number 4 - �
� 4 Rlbrechts 01-4305-05@-50 disposal fee 5@_Q�@ • Q
4 50. @0 `
:� Totals Ternp Check Number 4
. (l
Temp Check Nurn6er 5
"� 5 All Fire Test @8-4335-@@@-00 re fire ext insp 144.40 ��
5 AI1 Fire Test 01-4335-310-50 re fire ext insp 9.0a
� 5 All Fire Test @1-4335-31@-70 re fire ext insp 9,@@
5 All Fire Test 15-4335-310-60 re fi're ext insp 9.@0 �
:..� 20 2 71. 40
Tat�Is Ternp Check IVumber 5 (,,,)
-� Temp Check Nurnber 6
�.�
6 American Hiking Saciety Q�5-44@2-105-15 publ g,Q��
_l - ----
•• 6 ,
5.000 ( ,:1
Totals Temp Check Number 6 ,
•- Ternp Check Number 7 �}
� 7 Hituminous Roadway 08-4480-@@0-@@ re parking lot cle�nup ' S1_68 � �
,
� � 51. 68
:� Tatals 7ernp Check Num6er 7 •
f'?
...� � ( ;
�::r=`:'t:ci', ` `�:1' .-ti:�-:t;,::�=.:d`-!`� -�•�°p:.; • :,.: � :�:ari •' 1%S3s :::va�+.�4;fist:s;:p.:.•1 - .teti <?, �.,.. - -
�� �. �'lt:Kw. I'• �f.. . .�.� .!�C:
. . - ��•, h .+.�.�_.,'�•-•-•—�- Ky7.'i++iJ;+;".., �1+-�^'^�:�i. '..3��: .q: �i. .f:^lw., .i`i:�`�.`.�'V"4�}?.',..'4o+.�+yij,>:!',�'.�':.
. . . . .. . :'f . . .'�.'"?.:..�v. ,f'�.:' �,.lJ:.� �,.ti,�,rN . . .
. � . ' ` w 4. � . ��'x'.., . ' . . . ' ' . • . . � ' . ... ♦..,.�';.�':�' . • . ..... ' ..y. . ♦ . . .
i t cts uct i'�+'�a
• Fri 3:' 1
,--�•� Terap Ghecx Nuraber
Tentp. _
Check '
` � Nurnber Versdor Name
r7
Claims Lisi
City of Menciata Heic
Account Cvde
Comrnent �
Amaunt
�„' -
~� Terop Check Nurnber $ �
' - -
�y = 8 B R� J Ruto Supply -. _ . 4t2-4330-460--30 - . • __ "' parts" �`" " _ .__ - 13. 09 ._._._. _ �
8 B R J Auta Supply �i1-4330-49�D--50 parts • 99.98
...1 i6 1 i3. 07 �
• iatals Ternp ChecSt Number 8
-•� Temp Check 1Vumber � �
. � .�
9 Batteries F�lus Q�1-43@5-030-30 splys 39.46
-� 9 �aiteries Plus @1-4305-030-30 splys 74.44 ��
K.. -- ------
� 18 113.90
;� Totals Temp Check Numtaer 9 �
Temp Check Number iQl '
--� i@ L�auer Built @2-433@-490-5Q parts 303 ' ��.3�+ ,'�
10 Hauer Huiit 01-4330-490-70 ' parts 3Q�'3 20.30
10 Etauer k'�uilt 15-4330-490-60 parts 309 20.23
� 10 Sauer Built @1-433Q�-460-30 ' parts 8.85 �
10 Bauer BuiFt 01-4330-490-50 parts �S.ik
� 5Qa 94.$� ��
Tatals Temp Ci�eck Number f0 �
� �
' Temp Check lVumber 11 ��
-,� 11 Baard of Water Cammissa:onera 1�-442�-310-60 3rd qtr 8_90 �Y,�
11 $. $tD ,
� 7otals Ternp Check Number 11 • �
Temp Check Number 22
' 12 E�laeser Larrdsc�pirrg @1-4268-�50-50 tree planting . 13,284.0Qt f�-''
:� 12 . ' 13� 284. 00 �
�� Totals Ternp Check Number 12 �'
Temp Check iVurnber 13 �
�l ' �.`
13mGi�ty-Mot-cr-Sa'pP`1`y ¢�"1=�30=49ID=50 part s 193. 73
, 13 City Motar Bupply 05-4330-490-k5 parts 42.66
• 13 City Mc+tor Supply Q�1-4330-460-30 parts 57.46 �-� �
39 � � ' �93. 85
� 7ota15 Temp Check Number 13 , ' �
•� Semp Ghecic hEurnaer 14 • ,r�•�
., +..
-} . . . �'; 1
�''- a r.�' .�x• : S: z. pti .> ,ryl...,�.. .. .n .•l" ^t' :^, i - : T:' . r'� - x'�'� L.*.. '�+�i+✓�.�^�w'�,,�::-."i"�'4 i ......_
'.h., t�y ' 4^c;::F^.Tc:?r.�--^r+-.�--^1�,-�t"�:`;--.�r,`;�vr�;..�:y.�:'y'�`,•h�':;;;,
- � 4-�:: :>'��-'' �:i:i'v:.i:%'' '.33y.�W1cYl��tiyi:%:4:=j?�t;+7,.'� `3�'.-�Y.•t�:5:is.V ` r3�'�.�`y,. „L-.�.s3kx".'rSA �ri��'.r����ti��:::r-:.�:.+.!:+±..:..'+.�aSiv'.;'•ii.i:`S=Ms^.�i..r '�w'.,�":-w, � . . . .
�.�-._�..`q ; �_ _ — __de^^..�^^r-.'.� - i.....- w,...of:'a�-�'.'�.:':�.":-� . 7'• il�;....:N:!,s^'—�,'?'-.t. .
'i'""J .. . ,. -. . . .. ... . . . .. . . • . T;jf.;?...... . � . .,.. • � ' �`+i`'%.':.~.. ,�.., � . . . . . , . .
Ctl VC'G ,t ^+`-�4 ijllltti5 L15T, e-�clgE :5 r"`
Fri 3: M City of hier�dota Hei '
4•�•f Temp Cherrc Nurnber 14
�
Ternp. ._ - - _ --- ._— �
...,{ Check
' Number Veridor hiarne Account Code Cc�rnrnents Amc��rr�t �3
.�-� 24 City af St F'auI 0i-442Q�-td50-5@ signs �38.?3 �
14 2�8. 7a �
� _ - - . Tatals _Temp Check Number - _.-- - — i4 - - .._ _ � ._� - -- _ _ _.,� __ ...__ _ _ _ _-.--�. -- - � Q
T�mp Check Nurnber 15
� 15 Cc�mmercial Aspha2t QtS'�t11t'�i.'G~��D.�JQ�"'JQ� wear rnix 47.a1 �
.-y i5 47.31 �
Satals Temp Check Numbe�^ f5 -
.1 Temp Check Number 16 � �
ib Cantinental Safety Eq 15-4330-490-60 rprs 364.41
-1 -- ------ {.�
-- i6 . • � . 354.41
�� Totals Ternp Check Number 16 '
� ' �,.)
Tetnp Gheck Nurntrer 1?
-•� 27 Dakota Courity Chamber af Cr�mrn 21-44'�0-Q�00-00 re firewtarks rnend bridge ly Q1@0_0Q1 a
37 • 1, 000. 00
•.t Totals Temp Check Number 17 �
-. �
Temp Check Number 18 `
18 Jarnes Danielscm 05-441.�.�-105-1� nov �llow 120. Q�0 �
i 8 12@. @0 �)
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 18
� Temp Check Number 19 �
19 Da��ner Land�caping f5-4330-49�t-60 sad 2#.30
19 � 1. .�@ �•'�
Zt�tals i'emp Check Nutober 19
Ternp Check Number 20 �-�
20 Dennis Delmant @1-4415-020-20 nav allaw , 120.0Q1
,..' -- ----__ �"i
z� • z��. ��
Tcttals Temp Check Number^ cQl
... �,.!
Temp Eheck IVumGer �1 . .
� ��
21 John Du Bai� Q�1-4220-135-8@ re pentel 2� 4.;7. 02
�# � 2, 437. 02
•• Totala Ternp Check Number 2i , ��-1
. {�.i
=.�, sx::,:.r; ••b:� ... .. ,_ � .. � cr�, :s� ...... . .,M -r�:•••:: x+:.< .,� .R,_.
, . . :?,�.' . . ?, .. i;';•'••• • -
' 1ri`j'{'X.. �'r,�. :'i-?: :i%;`.;i.:',.;,«:t ,��yw,w�+c�i��
�iv7'.+n:'� `y�"'�`M� .. - . t-<i';LSt" ."".��
_ �,iy.t.�,�..__.�,tXt�i;�:M . -'• �t�...L'r �: �� - +-�e . . . . . • . . . . . . . '� , ' . . ' .. � � . . , . . . .. , : .
� . - , , . _ �""'�-�.+ .. � ' . ' .. . .. . . .-.. . . , . . ., .
�ti uct 7 • •• �4
' Fri 3: '�
�-� Temp Check Nurnoer
- ---Temp. --
\-� Check
Number Vendor Narne
2i
Clairns List
City of �iendota Hei
Accaunt Code
Cornmer�ts
F'aoe 4
Arnount
�..
; - ,-
:•-'1
' Ternp Check Nurnber 22 ' ("1
,� -- 22 Fielstone Cabinetry Inc --� - - 01-4131=@2@-20 '- -' - � "' �r�ov prern; garlack � 78_0@ � a
•.:,�•
22 78.00
, Totals Ternp Check Nurnber �Z
(�l
Ternp Check Nurnber ^c3
'� 23 First Irnpressiuns 01-4268-65@-SQ� newsletter 1,037.6� �
23 First Impressions 01-4268-65@-85 newsletter 1i9.00
23 First Impressians SS-4268-650-60 295.70
1 newsletter
23 First Impressions 21-4268-65@-00 newsletter 297.45 �
e;;� 92 1� 749. 80 �
Totals Temp Check Num6er 23
:� Temp Check Number 24 �
• 24 Fortis Rer�efits Ins Co Q�1-�FS32'�Q�3S-30 nav prem 154.8@
� 24 154.80 � �-!
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 24
'� Temp Check Number 25 U
-� 25 Globe Rublishing @1-4300-@2@-20 splys 31.31 ` �.
25 Glabe Publishing 01-4300-020-20 splys 25.33 '•-�
50 . ;,6. 64
• Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 25 (}
� Temp Check Number 26 �
26 W W Grainger 08-4480-00@-00 shelving ' 1,283.3@
� �`6 1, c^83. 30 � �
Totals Temp Check IVumber 26 �
� Temp Check Number �7 �;:: �
_� 27 Guy Engineering Corp @1-4220-135-80 re pentel ' 2,500.@@
!' s
27 2, 50@. Q�0
-� Totals Temp Check Numtrer 27
Temp Check Number Z8 '
�...�
� 28 Group Health Inc 05-4131-1@5-15 nov prern kull�nder 195.30 �
..1 28 � • 195.30
Totals Temp Check Nurntrer 28 ;� .�
��1
.. • , �, i
..:i�'7�:��(,.`.�'fi'�' ,i e�•�•�:C, NW, i•i'i..
,n �:'i:. `.'C. .,�� � R.. �i.ii'" ::!" � �f� 1.� .-'i•.! � ' f.n
�:M,'l�+r+4�i.'S � . y'" ' .. r y:# .rw.:. ��.�..Y.,��-•M �� .�y�����a�S`r%itM°+'i� :f�: ' � �•.�'�M��+e+�qwy.+'tiw' _ _
N°'`r+.--^i.c,�':w+�,.n-i�..::6:;e„i�'� `�;eey�w,N '.�h:•>a��.'�A',••.i?�':� �" �.[r'A •:....t.�:.�. '•..........�: .+:1:" �sti '.G;f:.. ra'«+i
-�e!�•;�3�;'.^� , .,..`��rii+�..- �;�w ,. �,�'•3,�....J_�,:r.!.n .. . , ;,�,:: '"�
f . .. ;�Y..�b�-�n-T!jnYr�.l'+'��r- �� � �!. � � �: •.1 �� ^ /w'! �JY��'44e;r.'i+�r..;+.,�;+' , .Tn,!�r . .Z'.�.: t. , .�.iVh:M1l'.�'.,�'�',r'+1+:.; . , . . .
. . . .�.�... . . � . n. .. . �. =�i=. .... . ..9.`vZ4\v�.i.._ . . .� . .. • ..5.��'- . ' ' . . _. ' .. . .. . . . � �. .. � . ♦ . -.. �.•f1�� ..• . . .
r '
• Fr3u�3: �'M
f-� Ternp Cherx Number
Ternp. �
- - Check " - -
�� Nurnber Vendar hiame
�8
41 ci'1 fft5 1_ i 5'C
City of Kier�data Hei
Account Cc�d�
Carnrnent s
Page 5
�
- — - -- - _ ` _._.__ �
Amaunt �
� 3emp Ct�eck Number �� �
29 Hdwe Hank _ _. _ � � _ Qti-434J5-Q�.�,O-5@ - - - - _ �-- di ecount ' .' - -' -- - --..» � `. _-.2. 03cr' ` �'._ _ _ -�
-� �9 F{dwe Ftank sDi-4305-054t-50 sp2ys � 13, fd7
�9 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-QS@--SQ� splys 8.51
�'� ---_-
- 87 19.55 �
Tutals Temp Check Number • 29
£~� Ternp Check t�turnber 3Q+ �
30 He�ny Rental 01-4200-610-70 eq rental 187_28` �
� --
3@
187. 88
Q 7otals Temp Check Nurnber 30 _ �
Temp Check Number 31 •
� 31 Hoffers I»c 01-43@5-050-5Q sp2ys b3.40 �
� 31 63. k0 �
Tatals Temp Gheck Nurober 31
Temp Check Nurnber 32 �
<:� '
32 F'aul Kaiser 0f-4�68-150-30 oct svc 1�324.40 `•
-,� 32 P�ul F4aiser Q11-4415-030--30 act mi __��7.25 a
b4 i � 331. 65
� Tcrt�15 Temp Check Number • 3� �
Temp Checit Number 33
� 33 K�plan Bros 01-43¢��-05¢�--50 glaves 38.90 '`�
� 33 38. 90
••' Totals Temp Check IVurnber 33 i �.�
;:� Temp Check IVumber 34 • ��
34 K»utsan Rubbish Se�^vice Qt8-4335-00?�-00 oct svc 68.86"
"� 34 ,6.8..8.6 (-)
T.at.al.s�i'emp�Check SVumber ----^�4
�w� Temp Check IVumber ' 35 �
� 35 Tharnas t{r��eth 88-4415-704-0@ mi exp 61.77
35 7homas Knuth 88-4415-702-00 mi exp 8,70 �
:? r� >
�:� . � �':..
�<,c'C.•.,r�C�t.�'<-;-"'��j=,;;-yt5'�'',",R..^�.."' :': .�'r'j.""_:� ;'n, wx.,.:.: .�„r _
. .. . . �.. . .. . . `•`:{i ,t`r" ..+�. '.?.:y..::..i=:<;::: :»k,. 'f; "'Y;;,3i5�f:., zri-�..i�r.sr.... '.a.:�:k" -:,F;'
- ,;.�t ^'"'.ec`�.::t=_i.e:t' "�'."�w+vr.�. .�4t•;;..,.i+.'�Eix:;2;. •,.c's•, •t ut.. . e:yo .:r:"'' t:wY< . . . �-"? ,
:.>:';s" '•' .,
.
. : ,c..;:::::. .
. . ,. ..: . . . . ''� ' . � ':'•�.; "'iK�:�';� .
:��• ,
,.. ,.,
, . . . J:
: . . �
. ... . : .. . . . , � �i,
' �:a. . � . ., �. --.• _.-_ ' .��.,.�.�..,:.� �e:+:« rf+--'��`-�' � —'—� 4�. � Y:;'-*f{t;;b'�`,�..` �...�,.::, -��.rc^ ,. ;-.�•--^�"'''. s- .7^`tt.7;•"•
_ "".`�"�' , .._�____..��. ,+ . . ' .. . . , � . • .. "`'''�%'_� r:.r.": ..� ... "�7k"�'. . . _i � . .. . ' ..... ' . .
cts ucs 1�'-��+ Giairns L.is� �+age B �
} Fri 3: 'M City of hiendata Hei '�••
i� Temp Che�x lUumher 3S � 4?
Ternp. - - - - � - - - - - - _...— ._ ^ �
� Check
`r t�urnber Vendar Narne , Accaunt Code Carnmenta Amatint �
� 35 Thomas Knuth iS-4�i0-tB6Q-60 rni exp f6.82 - �
�• 35 Thamas Kr�uth c9-4415-834-00 rni exp 34.8� .
35 7horna� Knuth i6-44i5-842--00 rni exp 22.68
� .-._ _. 3S Thamas Knuth _ _._.__ . _ - 0a-4415-f45-15 .. _ - _ .__. ......_ �ni' exp `- - - �- - ` _ _4.06__.�.._ __ _ � - - �
35 Thorna5 i{nuth 0S-44i�-i+ii5-15 nc,v allaw 10. QiiD
...} ^c45 158.7? �}
Tatals Tet�p Check Number 35
;� Temp Check IVum6er 35 �
�6 L E L 5 01-�075 nav dues 275.00
� s6 C75. Q�0 �
Totals Ternp Check Number 36
� Temp Check iUurnaer 37 � �
^-� 37 L.atfe U S A 0l.-4131-020-20 nov prem 322.3@ �
37 �ife U S A 01-4131-QJ50--50 nav p�^em 185.68
37 L.ife U S fl 05-4131-305-15 nov prern 221.57
;•� 37 Life U S A 15-4131-060-60 ' nav prem 252.'70 �
`- 37 Life U 5 R Q�1-4231-070-70 s�:ov prein 1�0.65
37 Life U S A 0i-4131-110-10 nav prern 144.70
� 2z2 i, 317. Si. , �
� Totals Temp Check Number 37 • ;
� Temp Check Number 38 �
38 M 7homas Lawell 0i-4415-110-10 nav allaw 175.Q�0
`� -- ------ �_)
38 175. Q�0
� Totals Temp Check Nurnber 38 . �
Ternp Gtreck Nurnbe�^ 39
•�� 3� L.awtan Printing 01-4300-310-10 splys 30.?5 �-�
39 30.?S
'�� 7otals Ternp Cheok Number 39 �•�
Ternp Check Number 40 �
�i c..�
�O=L-incoln�BeMefi�t @1=c@74 nav prem . 40.00
40 Lincoln Benefii 01-413f-ID2@-20 nov prem 363.8� �
�� 40 L3ncalrr Benefit 01-4131-110-10 nav prem 127.J4 �'
i2@ � 531.'76
� Totals Temp Check Nurnber 40 �
Ternp Check Nurnber kl
,_1 . �.)
.r:.� , , �,
�, .r: c-- , rss; c : -s�rst�:.;t�...�,�,,: . n:c• ..% ^t ::r.."'-ra;,,i,;'rn;'-r--�--- �. ,; �sx --�c �.:, . _ . .
.l• ':Y4. -{ �'� r.A. �%3` tiv:�:::' =.�4.
�t .� . A - - -- `:�.a:..:ti
ir,,. �) fi% �w'�� . �; �:4ii � �., �>•�"-? i.`As''-�'.�: r► -ea+«i+-r--' ' _ '
" _ Y+. ''i :G:." "` .r<%%..•.F� „!� ...`� . . . . .:•.�.�+; ' ., .--{-�'-,"_'..,::. s.^.,;�•:'
••�«.'+w1i:--.-�.-..�� -':Y;yn�w�'.'Ws. :ir . i �f:,�.:.. :`�•.y.i.uc' i.�.�=�-.��,.�;.as . � . � .. . �.
, , , . .. .. , _ . . . . . . ^ _. 5..:�i�,ri'f�'?" , . " " w't y . . . � � . . . � .� .
co uL� i- � Vi�lrns Llst �� e 7 "
� Fri 3:? 1 City of Mendota Heic g �
Temp Check�Nurnber 41
-- Temp. - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Q
•� Check �
Number Vendar Name Account Code Cornrnents Arnour�t
-� 41 Lillie Suburban News 01-4490-07@-70 ernpl �d ice rink att 59_90 �
41 59.90 ,
�.,� " -' Totals Temp Cfieck Number � � 41 ' " - Y - •- - � __�_._ _ - _ - . _- �- ---_ •-,-- _— _ � _
. ` ��Ternp Check Nurnber 42
' 42 Maier Stewart & Assc�c 37-433@-479-0P re water tc�wer 7Q�,@Q�� �
.., p2 70Q�. @0
Totals Ternp Check Number 42 �
-.y Temp Ct�eck Num6er 43 Q
43 Med Centers H R 01-2074 nav prern 2,744.35
;� 43 Med Centers H P 01-4131-110-i0 , nov prern 1,293.22 �
43 Med Centers H F� Q�1-4131-02Q�-20 nov prem 2, 587. 68
43 Med Centers H P 01-4131-040-40 nov prern 648.00
••� 43 Med Centers H R @1-4131-@50-50 nov prern 1,457.28 ' �
43 Med Centers H P 0i-4131-070-70 nav prem g87,84
43 Med Centers H P Q�5-4131-105-15 nov prern 1, 4�7. 28
-� 43 Med Centers H P 08-4i31-000-00 nov prern 161.28 Q
43 Med Centers H R 15-4131-Q6@-6@ nov prern 485.28
387 11 � 642. 11
•• Tutals Temp Check Num6er 43 • �j
1
••a Temp Check Nurn6er 44 a
44 Metrc Waste Cantral 15-4449-Q60-60 nov svc 63,534.00
44 Metr� Waste Cuntrol I7-3575 nov svc _2,796_00cr a
Bfl 60, 738. 0@
� Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 44 �
Temp Check Nurnber 45
45 Midwest Busirress Rrc�ducts 0i-4300-110-10 splys 189.35 «
45 Midwest Business Products 0i-4300-040-40 splys 81.15
45 Midwest Rusiness Rraducts 05-4300-105-15 splys 189.3I ��
• 45 Midwest Business Products 15-4300-060-60 splys 81.15
45 Midwest Business Rroducts @1-4300-11@-10 splys g,97
•� 45 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-11@-1@ splys 3,1g
270 t.)
554.12
•� Tot�ls Temp Check Nurnber 45
Temp Check Number 46 ` � ' u
�� 46 M R G @1-43@5-03@-30 fire permit forrns 243.89 �
i
r" ;
f
• ('. ;
�•}� �r;. � - .:s: � "'�%i d;�•:w� W��.'.itl :�.._ pv .rt..:iaU .�+K 'Y�;. a
�+• wii .i�r:+�.::i�� ;T- r•• ' � J k�-='� � �•7!`:.u'r;::.y.�"". . ',�FS.='i+NY. ?4 �--"�:ti � ' ' _ �
. . - . . . . - . . •..�-.�.?��•,. . . . . . . �Q. � r,N,;i .. .,i'1-l-r i'h:;ft: �i.,�f y�t,✓-,. yi?';1., .t
� . . . . ... ` i. r � • � . � • . . r . .. . .. . ' . .. . .. . . � - " • .. . .. .. - �:�:ti��a�... . � .. . .. . .. .. .
�a uct i• Ciaims List p�9e 8
�• Fri 3:] City of Mendata Heig � �
-� Temp Check IVumber 46 . ' � .
- -Ternp. -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - -
;-� Check . �
� Number VencJor Name Account Code Comrnents Amount "�
-� 46 M P G , 01-4305-030-30 discount __4_58cr ;,.�
�` �- _ . _ _ _ _ _ � �39,. 32 �_____
� Totals Temp-Check Number 46 � � W` 'V � � � � � '� - � � " `� -
Temp Check Number 47
'.}
' 47 �linn Cellular Tele Co @1-4210-020-2a nov svc gi,gi ?-)
47 Minn Cellular Tele Ca 01-42i@-030-30 nov svc 2i.48
-� 47 Minn Cellular Tele Co @1-421@-@20-20 nav svc i2.52 �.-�
•� 47 Minn Celiular Tele Co 01-42i0-030-30 nov svc 10.74
47 Minn Cellular Tele Co 01-4210-110-10 r�ov svc 10.74
� 235 137.39 r�
• Totals Temp Check Number 47
� Temp Check Number 48 (�)
•-� 48 Minn Dept of Revenue @1-4320-@50-50 SERT fuel tax 4, 8Q� ' �,.�
48 � ` • 4.80 ...
� Tc+tals Temp Check Nurnber 48 , �
Ternp Check Number 49
.�
�' 49 Minn Mutual Life Ir�s 01-2074 nov prern 197.20 �
49 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-110-10 nov prem 43.6@ '•
.} 49 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-02@-2@ nov prem 10.20 �
• 49 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-4131-070-7@ nav prern 4,1� �)
49 Minn Mutual Life Ins @8-413i-OQ�Q�-00 nav prem 1,7Q�
� 245 256.8� �••}
Tatals Ternp Check Number 49
� Ternp Check Nurnber 50 �
••� 50 Minnesata Benefit Assn 01-^c074 nov prem 641.09
• 50 Minnesota Benefit Assn @i-4131-1i0-10 nov prern 3g,g1 t �
5Q� Minnesota Benefit Assn @1-4131-02@-20 nov prem s61.17
.i 50 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-050-50 nov prern 44.52
•• 50 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01-4131-@7@-70 nov prern 211.06 �•••f
50 Minnesota Benefit Assn 05-4131-105-15 ' nov prem 53.5s
.� _50 Minnesota Benefit Assn 15-4131-@60-62� nov prem � 45.51 � �
� �5@ 1 � 395. 69
.� Totals Ternp Check Number 50 '
{...''
Temp Check Nurnber 51 '
� 51 Minn State F C Assn 01-4490-03@-30 ad 65.Q�0 �
� 51 • 65. Q�0
Tatals Temp Check Number 51 +!
.)
' (._ i
.vY cs r. . . ..,��-,< •
�a>iw. �.Y."�^'7:�•.:;�:-�" ��—�i" �-'"''.�'_'+�`'-..= . C?i\'L'�..: 'tr`$4?'>ce •,�.4e^�q'+4�:ai4:wi�. _ �' . �. ;+;i;:' .ivv11'r��.t• �l.i,.- .. •�1:.ru . .+�y a:�w'�T,,k;a; � .�ls.: . �raa,� t. ---
, - , ���!hr:�•�n� : :...:..: ,.c�..a: ..�rt,4,�.._-. . . - f-.r,--.>r,r?i,^�+�!,.;.+;...-�-�-�-:�-�-.-=at% ,..,`i'.+-.....- �•+�-'--�.�'.�.-�'...i:-+._..�—�::,��',�.-�,-e.+,-ir'-i''i'`'+.. !:. ..�. ..k. 7,'.
, , . •:��::,.i�: cr:: v, :=�:,� ;G%?.+ '3"�'?=-'�.n . - . . ,G."'t : v.. . .. . . � .
.. . . . . . ' _ o . .. :•`4,.'�' . , .. , . . . . , - . . . .
...... . . . •'fr"r'.i..... . _ .: . . . .., , . .. .. ... � ... . • . . .. ... . .
�. ,�
cco u� � � v
Fri 3: h
Temp Check Nurnber
Temp. ---
Check
Nurnber Vendor Narne
JI
�iairns List
City vf Mendota Hei.
Account Code
Comments
Page 9
Amo�int
�
�
c7
�� Temp Check Num6er 52 Q
52 Motor F��rts Service - - - ' -- Q�1-433@-46@=30 - `226. 41 �
� _. __ _ _ _ -.-�_.�Parts�2281 —' — — ._. _. __ ..-. --_ - -. _�., _ __
52 Motor Parts Service 01-433@-490-50 parts 14.3� �
52 Mcrtor F'arts Service 01-4330-490-7@ p�rts 32.3
_52 Mator F'arts Service 01-4330-445-4@ parts _il_13 �
:.j
208 284.29
r� Tot�ls Ternp Check Number 52 �
Temp Check Number 53 .
� �
53 R E Mooney & Assoc 37-4330-479-@@ re w�ter tower 522,g9
� 53 522.89
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 53 (�
Temp Check Number 54 �
�
54 John Neska 01-44@@-030-30 exp reirnb fc�canf 99.52
� _54 John Neska 01-4415-@30-30 mi fc conf _48_14 a
108 14•7. 66
� Tot�ls Ternp Check Number 54 Q
Temp Check Numbzr � 55 • � ;
� 55 Northern State Rower Q�i-4212-315-3@ nov svc it4.56 Q
55 Northern St�te Power 01-4212-310-50 nov svc 79.06
� 55 Northern State Rower @1-4212-310-70 nov svc ' 79,@6 �
55 Northern State Power 15-42i2-310-60 n�v svc 79.05
55 Northern State Fower 01-4212-32@-70 nov svc �3.17
� 55 Northern State Power 08-4212-000-00 � nov svc 114.48 . �
55 Northern State Rower Q�1-4211-325-30 nov svc 47g,27
55 Northern State Power• 0i-4211-310-50 nav svc 155.38
� 55 Northern State Power 01-4211-310-70 nov svc 155.38
55 Northern St�te Power 15-4Z11-310-60 nov svc 155.39 �•�•�
55 Northern State Power 28-4211-000-00 nov svc g7-7,9�
� _55 Northern State Power 0i-4211-3@0-50 nav svc __39g�pg {`�
660 a 2� 7�D6. 85 �
47 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 55
�...?
Temp Check Nu'mber 56
� 56 Northern State Power @1-4211-42@-5@ nov svc 49.66 �
56 Northern State Power 08-4211-000-00 nov svc 897.1i
� 56 Narthern St�te Power @1-4231-320-70 nov svc 165.54 Q
56 Northern State�Power 15-4211-400-60 nov svc 425.90
224 I--
•�� •Tatals Ter6p Check Number g6 �538.21 �.:�
~�, / �.. �
�:'7�1�. wti�: .��f` Cv '�f,.' t:!Y�.t„+. , h,. � t .� R.. ..ctv^n•.•.;•, v � r,y _
— :a' ',..::i:iw:+�-''c'•X•3: :K>..•. '%.�.�r: ....-.:..w:�:kw:� r . ! '{4 !.,R '.f •, •.�;c=,.:_ .':t d-: ;c�i._.�.
, s ���w4^� r.•,s. S� . `�..a ,�5.✓... .y .;i.��•:r s+._+4 .n'�� :q•':� '�:4. - ..e:. .��:L:+:::<i4:+ia�c'.. •�rs.. ::,u.�.�
. ... .�.T�a.. . �'^.yr:.Y _ ',v:.c�rrl•iMpt.�..:-:. �•�y �,�rt:H:���n+.e%x:. W�.p 0W, :M'i�l%?Is`Li+`y-e= .'r�-+�' �-rL"e` .. ++ � . :,r.-.`b ^�.`ra^.r—
. . L ..w,o,u , . . i^_*;G•/:_..c>h ..tir.t::j.;'�s��.:' i 'F .. :,sry.: �. „�':e++i+'�s; . . .t�'ai?<�•.: ' .. ` • '
' . ... . . . .. . ... .. . . ... .. . ... . . .. . . • � . . . . . `.:j::�i'::i+�:. �. .. . � .... . . �.ri . . ' . � . . .. . • .
� '-" "�0 j`�'' C:lairns List Page 10 �
Fri 3:' +1 City of Mendota Heii Q
(�
Ternp Checec Number 56 • •
- - __Temp. - - - - - - � - - -- 0.
,-� Check �
Nurnber Vendor Name Account Code Comments Amount
`1 Temp Check Nurnber 57 �
cn� --- — 57 Oakcrest Kennels= - - - @2-4221"=80@=90 -' � -- �"-oct svc"- -.` ` - `� _ ��� 255. @0 ' - - � -- . 0
57 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4225-800-90 oct svc • 3g2,�5 ,
114 647.75 �
' �otals Temp Check Number 57 •
•-� Temp Check Number �8
58 Office M�x 05-4300-105-15 splys 55.38 �
5B Office Max 01-4300-070-70 �
1 splys 169.30
58 Office Max @1-4301-110-10 splys 51.31
58 Office Max 01-4300-110-10 splys 57.21
, 232 333.00 Q
Tota2s Ternp Check Nu�ber 58 •
� Temp Check Number 59 (�
� 59 Mark Olsen . Q�1-4�c68-Q50-5@ rnowing svc 77Q�_@0 �
59 ' 770. 00
-� Totals Temp Check Number 59 �
Teinp Check Nurnbe� 6@ � • � �
� 60 F�ete Pappler & Sons 01-45Q�0-@70-70 tree rernoval 3Q�@, Q�� ��
60 Pete Poppler & 5ons 01-45@@-@70-70 tree removal g@,@�
..� 120 350.00 �)
Tatals Ternp Check Number 60
� Temp Check Number 61 . � �
61 Rower Rrake Er�trp @1-433Q�-490-50 p�rts � 117.66
61 �`
117. 66
::a Totals Temp Check IVumber 61 • �
Ternp Check Nurnber 62
-� 62 Frincipal Mutual @1-2071 nov prem 189.84 ��
—�-62�Pri�ncipal�Mut�ua'1 01=�►1`32=02-0=�0 nov prem gg,gi
Xti 62 Principal Mutu�l @1-4132-Q�5@-50 nov prern _28_52 �'�.
186 � ' 307. 27
� Tatals Ternp Check Number 62 �
Ternp Cherk Nurnber 63
•� 63 Road Rescue P�1-4�D��-Oi.;Gt-'20i , ......�.J<1 .... �� 4 I
'� • _ ` � 1
.:t.�1.: ��;. .c, - ;�, ; �"n, � r`vas, c.:,ir;::.9 :�:=. • .;r; k : '..�<.•;i.�r.. i r �.�r:"n>+,•, ;-^".,��,'..,,,.�,��, ..,^�±.�:t^m:?.?-�+-� ,r^cR+-
�I:j�� ��s�:j:. e�%'y� 4 — �.. _ :•'... - .'�•.�"�T.?:'r;•.••'r-`�-�.'T.�K
�::,wi:'+iiii. .JiY. ::sfi.'a' -s.3=:'ti::i:a'a:.� ��je�� '•;�� '.+et�.. '•tw+++:►•-,�-• ;w++: `.:..:.'"'.'�„" ,,r''„�".`ii %Fw�ii:'tcs:=�a:N.�:::��:Yr.w:��::� so-:�
.a.s _ ,::� .i.,_es,�` 3�. .4si}t1'.+'.s."a.e%-%':a+'' %T _ tn'.... �T'.+�w�+:i.i.Iw...+.�+.:..-..v..a::�.1,F� . .-:
' __ Fh`}..�..cH�N?�:��� }......-�vr;2� .�'•����� r,��• .. . �i+%: ,f c5 .� 1 i � f 1 � 1
� . . . . . : a .. - �'>..:)'�. .� <:i � � � . . • . • • , ., . . � . ' ' .. :� >.:� . . ' ' _ • ' ' •
�.. .. „ , - � �.�dirns �zsti Pa e 11 �
• Fri �3: +1 City of Mendota Hei 9
-••.� Temp ChecK Nurnber 63
_ y Ternp. — - - - - - - - - - — — Q--
•� Check
Nurnber Vendar Name Accaunt Code Cornrner�ts Arnount �
•--� 63 Road Rescue 01-43�5-030-30 splys 18.96 �
63 Road Rescue 0i-43Qt5-@30-3@ splys 38.34
63 Road Rescue 01-43�5-030-3@ splys 170.57
_ _63 Road Rescue --.__ _- _ -- 01-4305-03Q�-30 - - -- —"� splys - "'-- 38. 16 �
,,. �. . 315 ` ' � � ------ _ _. _ . _ .
••.� Tatals Ternp Checit Nurnber 63
241. @3
Ternp Check Number 64 �
�'1
' 64 Brad R�g�n Inc 01-4330-49Q�-50 tires 3@9 70.23 �
64 Br�d Ragan Inc 01-4330-490-70 tires 303 70,z�
-� 64 Rrad Ragan Inc 15-433Q�-490-60 tires 3ID9 70.23 Q
192 ------
210. 69
-� Totals Temp Check Number 64 �
Ternp Check Number 65 .
•� 65 Rails to Trails Conservancy 05-4402-1@5-15 handbook �
__ 3@. 57
-,� 65 • - 30.57 ' Q
Totals 7emp Check Number 65 �
-.� Temp Check Number , 66
66 Ruff Cut Q�1-449Q�-040-4@ ' weed cut 480.00 ; �
•� 66 . ------
Totals Temp Check Nurnber 66
480. @0 d
� Temp Check Nurnber 67 Q
� 67 St Joseph Eq 01-433@-490-50 parts 95.26 , �
67 ----- '
Tatals Temp Check Number 67
� 95. 26
'",
Temp Check Nurnber 68
�.�
�� •68 S E H 22-4220-712-00 re mh rd traf sign�l 508.28 �
..) 68 508.28 �.�
Totals Temp Check Number 68
•:� Ternp Check Number 69 '
Ca
69 Schumachers Inc Q�1-4305-Q�30-30 splys 127.80
� 69 Schumachers Inc 01-4305-030-30 discount 2,4@cr �
69 Schurnachers Inc 01-4305-070-70 splys 76,79
.�
� �..J
...a ' �:
.•i; +;� �:.>: � ' , „r� r�e � -.,
'•`-�a�e%�+..+n�++e-.-�-��--���.%:�i:�'•.^�::+! .�?. ., • ��t•: r. .a,.
_ ..r;e+��irjy.' .Y:i+!:+.4+..!....v. .a. HKx 't�r: �a yi y•rr,° _ ..r., ;:u;+'.,� _ ?+. ..�s
—]----^�^-��r+..+-- �' . . . , .: r+� �'� .. . .�.�.--�;+r,r, ir--�.+,'t.. �:W.�;*^^,:�,� . •:�: M:::-.�.�.�---�+.-.--r,,•.`'�. ' � �:r?�:• ='�JL''. ,si.:� �ki!+: �. � •.1•. ' � ' K`.. '�.}, .
. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ;t.A h}jc,:/,. SQ%`y:e=� re!� :- ��i.+�'.+,ya, e ... . �`''w;�, +.:n+;; ^` _ T
� . .. . .. .. ,.. .. . ' • . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . �.,�;..r.'c�:;:4'.... . • . _. .
� cd ucs �• Clairns List Page i� �
Fri 3: 4 City of Mendota Fiei E.,
Ternp Check Nurnber 69 �
't.) -
- ------Temp.— - - - - - -- -- - -- - ----- --- -
� Check
Number Vendor Narne Accaunt Cade Cornrnents Arnount ��
69 Schumachers Inc 01-4305-@70-70 � 1.44cr
i"� ___ d i scaunt
.. ------ �
276 • 2@@.75 --
� Totals'Ternp Check Numtier `- -" 69 " V �''- "'"""` "f " ` "" ' � - ` " " � �
Temp Check Number 7@
...�
•' 70 Sh�rnrock Cleaers @1-4410-�120-20 • sept cing 98.28 ��
70
�� Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 70 98.28 �
-� Ternp Check Nurnber � 71 - - �
71 Seven Corners Ace Hdwe 08-4335-000-00 splys 95.@6
� 71 � • 95.06 �-)
Totals Ternp Check Number 71 , � .,
� Temp Check Nurnber 7z �:}
� 72 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-422@-132-10 oct svc 3,@71.65 U
72 L E Shaughnessy Jr 05-4220-132-15 oct svc 306.65
72 L E Shaughnessy Jr 15-4220-132-60 act svc 484.00
_� 72 L E Shaughnessy Jr 21-4220-132-00 oct svc 364.20
'�" 72 L E Shaughnessy Jr -� Q�3-4z2@-132-00 oct svc 402.50 , U
_72 L E Shaughnessy Jr 2'3-4220-132-@0 oct svc 162.95 1
� 432 4� 791. 96 . (..)
Totals Ternp Check Number 72
~•� Temp Check Number 73 (�
i
� 73 Shels Auto Electric @l-433@-49e-50 rprs 3@3 175_75 �
�� 175. 75
:� Totals 7ernp Check Nurnber 73 ' {._�
Ternp Check IVumber 74
•�? 74 Shieley Co • 01-4422-05Q�-50 gravel g@,gg U
. } 74 90. 88 �-�
Totais Temp Check IVurnber 74
, .
:.� Temp Check Number 7;,
75 Spectrum Busir�ess Systerns @1-4330-490-1@ rprs 257.03 U
� 75 � 257.03 Q
Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 75
,� � �ti: �
_.) �... �
�+�.-r^+�ii+'.=�?-:rT "'a%�i"�'�i.i�w'��`r:�`.i-'ni'ito' ' :?;a„y,•.;�'a:.::�ti�.�......�2�.::G:��, .s�"•:t'•Y:::•"..�v::ii`Y%i'�#:'.c�::�Fr+:r�2ti!:::+:.u+,•-.4:•��n';'M':�`a ;e•��. r�.. .r,r.----•r��
.. . . : +2'.<-.. �c. . >:r,?^.•:{ � . .. ..w"�!i + J - t. . . . r w:..;•«�.; ` ' `'�'�§•• _ - , . .
_ '_^• C .�i•.: �_ ,.�% . _ .y.., ,.� �-s;.i,—.�..�_'«----!,4++;.v;��.,.:..--�'+�:,�'.. r" . .'ar�, .i%S!".f,�N•;He'.
. :..L. •'� ' � . ' . . - ' . . . . .. . ; ;•,. .
. _ . ...�'ic%:; r .i�. . .w "��it?>.. : . =%:•. . . . , . . . • • . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . • ... . . .. •� ` •. , . . - .. . . . . , . . . . . . ..
�� ��� , - ��airas �,a.sz F'age 13 �•
`-�} Fra. 3: 7 City of Mendotd Hei
� Temp Check Nurr�ber 76 • �
--�- - Ternp. - - . - - -- - --- ----- - - _ _
Cheek
�� Number Vendor Name Acco�mt Cade Cammer�ts Amaunt �
�-� 76 Ilavid 5a�^by �k-4410-�50-50 baiance 94 aliow 4i_98 Q
76 - - - — - —. _._... 41. 96 _ - --- .._. ._�
'fatals Temp Check�fU�imber 76 - - -• - --- -- - - .�---____ _...
� ,. ._ �
Temp Ch�ck IVumber 77
,
� 77 Southview GYtev ¢�1-433@-49Q�-50 parts 29.31 �
77 �9. 3i
�.) Tatais Terop Cheek Numbe�^ 77 � �
� Temp Check Number 76 � ` �
78 State Muival Ins 01-2074 nov prern 143.11
t„� 78 �tate Mutual Ins 01-4131-02@-20 r,av prem 140iQ�@ �
� ___
156 ' 283. 11
ti� Totais Temp Check Nurnber 78 �
Temp Check Number 79
7 79 8un Sa].es 01-43tb5-050-50 splys 141. �5 �
7�'3 8un. Sales 01-4305-070--�0 splys 141.55 '
..� �79 Sun Seles 15-4305-060-60 splys 141 57 �
237 . k24.6'7 '
,� Total� Temp Check Number 79 • �
Terap Check Nurnber 80
--� 80 U S West Cornmunic�tiar�s 02-4210-110-20 oct svc '345.78 �
8@ U 8 Weat Carnmu»icatia»s 01-4210-020-20 oct svc 533.3i
80 U S We�t Cammunicatians @1-4210-04@-A0 oct svc 61.57
� 80 U S West Communicatians @5-4210-105-15 oct svc 176.49 �
80 U S West Gamrnk�nic�tions G�1-4210-034+-3Q+ act svc 146.58
80 U S West Camm�inicatioris QI1-42f0-050-50 act svc 38.40
•••� 80 U S West Communicatiarrs 01-4210-Q�7@-70 act svc 90.54 �••��
8rd i1 8 L1est Cammur�ications 15-42i0-iIl60-60 � act svc 352,@?
� 640 1, 725. 6� �.�
Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 80 �
•� Ternp Check Number 81 � -- -�'��
.� Sf United Way St ��ul Q�1-�07@ nov cantr 126_75 �
ti
82 126. 75
� iotals Temp Check Number 81 �
.�
-� $568 . 122y 557. 0B �� 3
.� . �.,: �
�u.r :i- .'�t . •,t: y:+a;•'` ' %�c .. a, :t? �q ' ' . � ��:, .x q � •�fi ; .:� 'rsa�+' .�l:.,: _ ,-.,-r. . ,t - i, .'ti�i.n+' '��........,..:.�_
- 'x •`+%+.�:�:i%9::- . '''i:::r-;i:::- .'�'�.ti:.�_..i;i:�E : : y,.; . ;;;:.:, . <.ro ,z• , 4-"-;+.,-�-r»�r.st.�:{• � a. a:«a�%:'ir,G��... '�` ��^.. •. . :
:.�'�' --r-,.':.�.'wE='�"---'""'*-:-b�-.j::,+. -.-.+.—...t�,. .%r�'"'.+F�. `v;. ",r. ;i k;, .�"?... �-., .�..:�. �. , . � . . .. .
� ,�s. � r, . h'i''•"-'"� c . . . . y �?�```.,x:;:'''; :. ;ryi:-;`�":''•w{> 1: -..
\L r ^ �' . f.. . � � e >,:;"�. :l:'n
„�, , , . . 'rG 6";.� i `,.� �•'•: ,..! ri�'`.�. ^✓y' :�i: � . . ., . . . ..
. . .. �• ... • . .., _ ..,. . .. ... . , . ";i<,�.,i.��l:^:sh`.:L'.•,!:+..:..:a..y. . , :f�';tn'
. .
.: �
n . . �.
� n
MANUAL CHECKS 11/1/94
�' - • � Ci
14952 3,274.08_ State,Capitol C U ._ __10/14 payroll �-- ------- --- -- -- - - -
,.;� -- ----- - - — -.. __.._ _ �. . _ .__ - - - t4953 .I3,84 PERA . +� � �
14954 8,701.11 " H
. 14955 750.82 ICMA ��
, 14956 788,00 Minn Mutual W ()
14957 405.00 Minn State Retirement �� -
14958 256.80 Dakot� Coiunty � H
r� 14959 555.00 Dakota County State Bank " �
14960 3,588.75 Comnissioner Revenue "
14961 15,543.06 Dakota County State Bank - "
.7 14962 46,4$9.86 Payroll a/c� N (7
14963 � 503.33 U S Post Office newsletter
14965 180.00 �eu Claire Cty FC llssn regr
� • 14966 . 329:28 NSP • utilities E7
14969 '297.41 Dennis Delmont � Police chief conf '
14968 62,547.70 American Natl�Bank lease payment
.� 14969 � 100.00 Great Western Life 10/14 payroll �
7 144,234.02 Q
l G.T. 266,791.08 �
� . . . .. . '
• �
� �
y
:� ' G
� � �
.:�
[7
� �
� . C_7
.:? � - (J
� . •
��s � � �
� I t �;
� - . C.i
::3'li:T.i:;iC;:i':,- �X.:!:i'. :vS:.. ..�,a.a!�wr ._.�,� _.. .ti: . • .
!Ya : ti ' i:.� •'
:-:��.. ..4.. 1 � .
r
:�
:y::"
sy..
- _ si�:u: � "
t�.�•. ..�rc. .—.'-,...��.`=ri'��
'•.o%:`` '4.L•.�: �:%w�" i:iixe :
'%s: � � �i:+.:t' .�.�:�� °+4>:.i:%:�.;s.
.::i4E;•;�:�l.ui+''-,:; :�:�%�:,•:�"'i:iu...-:�:.�+-:-==�+'''�`r ra+t^+ ha^�:-�.-; �:-«= .-�:�-r+X:�.
t � � - ', 'F � . . . . . . -.:;:titi . . .. ,..[':r�:ti . .. . ...
• . . . . _ , , . � , ;��'C' . . . Jri . . .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
October 26, 1994
- �
I
� TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: Marc S. Mogan, P.E., Civil Engineer�"�.�
SUBJECT: Friendly Hills Task Force Report
{ Job No. 9221 �
;
DISCUSSION:
�
The Friendly Hills Task Force was established by the City Council and ch;
identify issu�s, concerns, and goals, relative to drainage, speed confxol, traffic vo
�
jthe repair � r reconstruction of streets in the Friendly Hills neighborhood.
Members of the Friendly Hills Task Force had their first meeting on Septe
1994. After the issues were identified, the Task Force went on to select and supp
of solutions wluch they believed best addressed the street and diainage problems c
Friendly Hills neighborhood. Subsequent meetings were held on October 13 and
finalize and formalize the task force findings and recommendations contai.ned in tl
' presentation to City Council.
;
The enclosed report identif'ies the issues identified and discussed by the Ta
,
and presents recommendations for a course of action which was believed by the T
; be in the best interest of the neighborhood, and to be a sound long term solution b
, addressed.� As a result of drafting this report, City staff has taken the opportunity
previous feasibility report and has developed updated information which could be
� preparation of a revised feasibility report.
,
The Task Force is cognizant and sensitive to the time element inherent wit;
public improvement project, and consequently has established the following propo
deadli.nes. �
� �
� Task Force Report Presentation Novemb�
� Ordering Feasibility Report & Calling for Hearing
a
�
Accept Feasibility Report Novemb�
: i
�
+ Friendly Hills Public Hearing
; ;
�
; i
� ;
# '
�
� �
+
to
and
er 28,
a number
the
i, 1994 to
� report for
: Force,
�k Force to
the issues
� revisit the
sed for the
type of
1, 1994
15, 1994
6, 1994
RECONIlVIENDATION:
I recommend that Council review, accept and adopt the findings and recommendations
of the Friendly Hills Task Force report, and order the preparation of a feasibility for the entire
neighborhood
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting
Resolution No. 94- , RFSOLUTION ACCEPTING FRIENDLY HII,LS TASB
REPORT AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
FRIENDLY HII.LS 1ST, 2ND, 3RD ADDITIONS AND PAGEL ROAD STREET
RECONSTRUCTION.
MSM:dfw
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NOa 94-
� RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FRIENDLY HILLS TASK REPORT A
' � ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
F �FRIENDLY HILLS 1ST, 2ND, 3RD ADDITIONS A1�TD PAGEL RO
� STREET RECONSTRUCTION
� 1 (IlVIPROVIIVIII�TT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. �
i �
; WHEREAS, the Friendly Hills Task Force has submitted their report to the City
respect to the proposed reconstruction of Friendly Hills lst, 2nd, 3rd Additions, a
Road , to-vvit:
i �
j The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of ea;
the' grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, construction
; curbs and gutters and storm pipes on the streets to be situated in the area h�
� moi� particularly described.
� �
' WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated w
City of M j ndota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more particularly d
follows:
! Friendly Hills lst, 2nd, and 3rd Additions and all property
{ abutting Pagel Road
i
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the (
Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
a
1. That the report of said Friendly Hills Task Force be and is hereby received,
2. Th � t the Ci En ' eer be and is hereb authorized and directed to are
, tY � Y P�P
report as to whether said proposed improvements are feasible, and as to the
cost of said improvements.
Adopted b� the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of Noven
CITY COUNCII.
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
:
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
!
�
�
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
�uncil with
Pagel
nents and
concrete
inafter
in the
:ribed as
of
feasibility
, 1994.
FRIENDLY HII�LS TASK FORCE REPORT
FRIENDLY HII,LS TASB FORCE INTRODUCTION:
The Friendly Hills Task Force was established by the City Council and charged to
identify issues, concerns, and goals, relative to drainage, speed control, traffic volume, aad
the repair or reconstruction of streets in the Friendly Hills neighborhood.
Members of the Friendly Hills Task Force had their first meeting on Septemher 28,
1994. After the issues were identified, the Task Force went on to select and support a number
of solutions which they believed best addressed the street and dra.inage problems of the
Friendly Hills neighborhoad. Subsequent meetings were held on October 13 and 26, 1994 to
finalize and formalize the task force findings and recommendations contained in this report for
presentation to City Council.
This report identif'ies the issues identified and discussed by the Task Force, and
presents recommendations for a course of action which was believed by the Task Force to be
in the best interest of the neighborhaod, and to be a sound long term solution to the issues
addressed.
ffiSTORY:
The streets in the Friendly Hills neighborhood were constructed 25 years ago. They
have outlived their expected 20 year useful service life and need reconstruction or resurfacing.
The condition of the existing stxeets are such that typical preventative maintenance practices no
longer provides an acceptable driving surface.
Some members of the Friendly Hills neighborhood presented a petition to the City for
street reconstruction in the Fall of 1992. A feasibility report was prepared and presented at a
public hearing on September 7, 1993. That hearing was continued until November 16, 1993
to accept fiurther public comment. At that meeting, City Council acted to defer any action on
the entire Friendly Hills feasibility report, and instead ordered a feasibility report for Friendly
Hills lst Addition. City Council accepted that report on December 7, 1993 and a public
hearing was scheduled for January 18, 1994. After considerable discussion on the subject,
Council adopted a six month moratorium on street reconstruction. Following that moratorium,
Council in 7uly of 1994 deemed it appropriate to establish a seven member task force to
address the Friendly Hills Street Project. The primary goal of the Task Force was to develop
a course of action for the project and present it to the Council for their action. A group of
1
I properiy owners in the neighborhaod volunteered, or were approached by Council
1 Staff to serve on this task force. From this group of 10 individuals the following �
i to serve. i
� �
� Seven Member Task Force:
, ,
�
Name Address Addition
i
� ,
Mike Blake 2204 Aztec Lane 1 st
r
Robert Gilbert 777 Keokuk Lane 3rd
! Don Harrington 2147 Aztec Laae 1 st '
, Fred Lambrecht 2182 Aztec Lane 1 st ',
' � 7ohn Mazcko 751 Cheyenne Lane 2nd '�
Ralph Myhrman. 736 Navajo Lane 3rd �',
� Doug Wenzel 739 Pontiac Place 3rd �
Th� following three (3) individuals were appointed to serve as alternates.
' Three Member Task Force Alternates:
Naine Address Addition
. �
Debbie Evenson 2130 Fox Place lst
Beinie Friel 750 Mohican Lane 3rd
,
; Ruth Hipp 2124 Aztec Lane 1 st
Council stipulated that the three Task Force Alternates would not have any ,
� privileges, but they were encouraged to attend the meetings and offer their input on
1
; DEFINITIONS:
;
iKey Termis:
i ,
i i
'' �
�
�
�
� �
City Standard Streets
City Non-Standard Streets
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street
Reconstruction Project
Overlay Project
Infrastructure Replacement �und
Tag Increment �nancing (1'I�
Park �nd
Special Assessment
Project Assessment Policy
2
City
�e chosen
the issues.
City Standard Strcets
Gity Standard Streets are streets which are classified as either Iaca1 ar collector
streets, City Standard local streets are of a 7 ton design capacity, constructed 33 feet
wide, face to face, with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. City Standard
collector streets are streets which are � ton design capacity, and are otherwise
constructed to Municipal State A►id (MSA) standards.
City Non-Standard Streets
City Non-Standard Streets are streets which da not meet the foregoing criteria
for City Standard st��eets. The exi.sting streets in Friendiy �[ills are deiined as Non-
Standard streets because they are genexally 30 feet wide without concrete curb and
gutter, and have culverts and ditches, as apposed to a storm sewer system network.
Municipai S#ate Aid {�vISA} Streei
� T'his is a street which has been designated by Council resolation as a roadway
listed on the community's Municipal State Aid Street Irnventary. If a designated street
is constructed to MSA Design Standards, all of the street project cost and a
praportionate share af the storm sewer pmject is paid with State Aid funds. Decoarah
Lane has been, designated as a Municipal State Aid Street. Current MSA stawciards
require that streets in this functional classifi.catian be cansttucted a minimum of 28'
wide, face to face, with no parking; 32' wide, face to face, with parking an one side;
or 38' wide, face ta face with parking on both sides. Utilization of these funds is
permitted to reduce the assessable cost of a project.
Reconstruction Project
This is a project which would upgrade existing Non-Standard Streets to meet the
requirements of City Siandard Streets, or MSA Streets, including starm sewer, and
concrete curb and gutter.
Overlay Project
As used in this report, an Overlay Froject is a project which wauld provide a
new dnving sa�ace, and minor ditch and culvert repairs to the existing City Nan-
Standard Streets in Friendly Hills and would result in a Non-Standard Street.
Inirastructure Replacement Fund
This is an item in the City Budget which was established to fund capital
impxovements to the City's infrastructure. One hatf af any project cast which qualifies
3
for funding under the City's policy for upgrading of existi.ng Non-Standard
City Standard Streets could be paid for from this fund and therefore would
assessed to the individual property owner. Most recently, this fund was uti
defray one half of the cost of the improvements necessary to upgrade the st
London/Downing neighborhood to reconstruct them as City Standard Streel
i
Ta� Increment �nancing (TII�
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a funding source which has been i
to facilitate development or redevelopment of property which might not be
economically feasible to develop or redevelop otherwise. Any full or pro�
share, of any project cost, which qualifies for TIl� funding would be exclud
improvement costs assessed to the individual property owner, and those pro
would be paid from TIF funds. The old fire station and commercial propert
Dodd Road are parcels which would be eligible for TIF funds.
Park �und '
The Park Fund is a budget item in the City Budget to fund capital in
or maintenance of the City Park and Trail System.
S ecial Assessment
P
;
�
� This is a procedure established by State Statute whereby any project
associated with a proposed improvement which does not qualify for fundi.ng
combination of alternative funding sources would be levied against the bene
properties.
�
Project Assessment Policy
!
� The assessment policy for a Reconstruction Project would require t�
nnproved or buildable property fronting a street which obtains concrete cui
gutter, be assessed a proportionate share of the street project cost by the un
The Reconstruction Project Assessment Policy would require that all prope�
the area of the project (those properties which contribute storm water) not �
assessed for storm sewer be assessed a portion of the storm sewer project G
assessment policy for a Reconsttuction Project would require that all impro
buiidable property fronting a street, which obtains concrete curb and gutter
one unit for storm sewer assessment purposes. Property which does not rec
coricrete curb and gutter, but is withi.a the contributing (or "tributary") drai
the�project, would be assessed a proportionate share of the storm sewer cos
basis of an equivalent residential unit in accorda.nce with City policy.
4
Streets to
aot be
lized to
�eets in the
i from the
ct costs
east of
by any
;all
and
method.
i within
�t. The
ed or
be assessed
iage area of
on the
Fifty percent (50 �) of all assessable costs for a complete Reconstauction Project
would be paid for by the City, and 50 °b would be assessed against benefitted property.
The assessment policy for an Overlay Project would require all improved or
buildable properiy fronting a street be assessed a proportionate share of an Overlay
Project cost by the unit method. Zero percent (0�) of all assessable costs for an
Overlay Project would be paid for by the City, and 100 °lo would be assessed against the
benefitted properiy.
ISSUES IDENT�3iED BY TASK FORCE:
The Task Force identif'ied the following issues and made certain specific
recommendations with respect to some of them as indicated.
a. Need.
The Task Force agreed that the streets in the Friendly Hills
' neighborhaod have seriously deteriorated and are at the point now where
replacement is imperative.
b. The estimated cost of the improvement.
The estimated cost of the Reconstruction Project has been re-examined
by City staff. An in depth prelimi.nary construction estimate was performed,
and it appears that the currently estimated construction quantities may be less
thaa those estimated originally because there has been an opportunity for more
careful analysis. Furthermore, there are storm sewer savings to be realized by
specifying high density polyethylene pipe (HDPE) instead of reinforced concrete
pipe. Finally, additional savings may be realized by design and construction
methods not previously considered.
c. The economic burden of the improvement to individual property owners.
The majority of people in the neighborhood hold the view that the streets
need to be resurfaced. Thus, even if the storm sewer system is not installed
there will be a cost to the homeowners as a result of a Reconstruction or
Overlay Project. Furthermore, the City has a special assessment deferral policy
on the basis of economic hardship due to old age, or low income. Under this
policy, special assessments may be deferred. � However, such deferred special
assessments would continue to accrue interest on the outstanding principal until
the property is sold, at which time the assessment would be paid.
5
d.
e.
f.
Quantifiable benefits vs. asse.ssments.
The issue of whether a property is benefitted by an improv�
economic, and not a subjective issue. By State law, a property ca�
assessed for an improvement in an amount greater than the benefit
properiy owner retains a right to challenge the amount of an asses.
period of thirty (30) days after the Council adopts the assessment t
However, the Courts in this state have already determined that the
benefit from storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter re�
this type increase property values by two to three percent
increase for reconstruction of streets).
Real affect on assessed valuation, property values, tages, and
marketability.
A property owner's assessed valuation will likely increase as
ANY special assessment. Such a valuation incmase would likely, b�
always, result in an eventual actual increase in real estate taxes. Th
valuation probably will not occur immediately. Reconstruction proj
type have been shown to increase the marketability of properiy, and
increase and maintain property values. Conversely, failure to proce
reconstruction project will likely contribute to a deterioration of real
values.
F�pansion of funding sources andlor assessment area.
�ent is an
�t be
�eived. A
ent for a
resolution.
n projects of
of the value
the result of
�t not
s increased
;cts of this
help to both
d with a
property
; There was previously some perception that not all properiy v�ihich
; ; contributed to the problems within the project area were contributing to the cost
g•
of the remedial improvements. The proposed assessment area for s
now includes all such properties within the drainage area not alread
This increases the number of assessable properties and reduces the i
be assessed because of certain economies of scale and other factors,
of the old fire station property east of Dadd Road, it also makes av,
source of funding property which is properly within the assessment
the effect of inclusion of that property is to further reduce the total
cost.
Loss of rural aesthetics in conversion to City Standard Street
The issue of the loss of rural aesthetics when converting to C
Streets is subjective. The facts are, however, that the Priendly Hills
neighborhood contains generally the smallest lots within Mendota He
making it the most urbanized area in the City.
0
rrm sewer
assessed.
ut costs to
In the case
lable as a
istrict and
Standard
h. Management of surface water ruaoff.
Surface water runoff would be managed by a system of storm sewer
pipes, catch basins, concrete curb and gutter, and concrete valley cross gutters.
Each component plays an important function within the system. Not every
intersection or home will have storm sewer constructed in its vicinity, either
because it is not warranted, or is not good economic engineering desiga.
Concrete curb and gutter by itself is an efficient and economic storm water
conveyance facility.
i. Management of lugh ground water.
High groundwater is a difficult problem to solve. Elimination of wet
basements by a proposed reconstruction project due to high ground water
conditions is not a likely result. The proposed storm sewer system included in a
Reconstruction Project would be constructed to a relatively shallow depth within
the street. In all likelihood, this storm sewer will be constructed above the
ground water level and would therefore have no effect on it. The only possible
way to deal with this ground water problem would be to construct a perforated
storm sewer system at an elevation some distance below the basement floor
elevations wherever this ground water condition e�cists. This would add quite
considerable cost to the pmject, and wouldn't necessarily guarantee a solution.
A Reconstruction Project would help to reduce the effects that surface water
runoff has on groundwater recharge through the separation and conveyance of
runoff within a storm sewer system.
j. Traffic and speed control on Decorah Lane.
There is a perception that a great percentage of vehicles are speedi.ng on
I3ecorah Lane relative to the total traffic volume. Previous tcaffic studies have
shown that even though speeding was observed on this roadway, it was no
greater than what would be expected theoretically. Lane width, traffic striping,
parking, and landscaping have been shown to have a slowing affect on traffic
speed, and should be designed into this section of roadway.
k. Decorah Lane street width and parking needs.
The consensus of the Task Force is to construct Decorah Lane as an
MSA street in accordance with MSA standards. Utilization of MSA funds to
construct this section of roadway is advocated to reduce the total assessable cost
for the entire project. The Task Force recommends that Decorah Lane be
constructed 28 feet wide with no parking between Dodd Road and Apache Lane.
The Task Force also recommends that a short dedicated right tum lane be
7
!
m:
n.
o.
constructed on Decorah Lane at the intersection of Dadd Road. 7
recommends that Decorah Lane be constructed 33 feet wide, face
parking on one side between Apache Lane and Pueblo Drive in oi
consistent with City Standard Streets even though MSA Standards
32 foot width.
Possible relocation of the Decorah lane intersection at Dodd
From a purely theoretical traffic engineering standpoint, it
desirable to realiga Decorah Lane with Wagon Wheel Trail. The
work could be paid with MSA funds and therefore would not be a
Task Force is of the opinion that this realignment might increase t
on Decorah Lane, and for that reason is not recommended.
Possible elimination of the Pagel and Dodd Road intersection
construction of the cul de-sac on the north end of Pagel.
� The removaUor abandonment of Pagel Road was discussed
Dodd Road and Keokuk Lane. The consensus is that this section c
should remain open as it has not been shown to be an unsafe inters
is perceived to provide convenient traffic access to the neighborha
Possible lowering of the intersection of Pagel and Keokuk.
There was some discussion about lowering the intersection c
Road and Keokuk Lane. There is a gas main at the intersection wh
affected. This work would increase the total cost of the project, m�
materially affect the intersection, and, ia fact, may adversely affect
private property. The Task Force recommends that this issue be ad
during fmal design.
Construction of a bus turnaround or a Park and Ride facility
Pagel and Dodd Road adjacent to Keokuk Lane.
There was discussion about the possibility of providing some
parking at Keokuk in the vicinity of Keokuk Lane and Pagel Road t�
Park and Ride location for MTC bus riders and whether or not the r
be willing to share in those costs. The Task Force is of the opinion
the close proximity of the South Plaza Park and Ride facility, that tl
wananted at this location.
�'3
Task Force
face, with
r to be
quire only a
ld be
for this
ed. The
� volumes
and it
Pagel
h would be
not
automobile
i provide a
iTC might
that given
us is not
p. Management of surface water runoff from the old fire station site.
The Task Force recommends that storm sewer should be extended to
this property which would allow future redevelopment of the property. A
proporkionate share of the storm sewer cost of that system would be paid out of
Tax Increment Financing and would thereby reduce the assessable storm sewer
project cost.
q. Site restoration and preservation of significant trces.
Lawns and driveway aprons would be restored to the extent they are
disturbed. Every effort would be made to save significant trees. Where trees
could not be saved on public right-of-way they would be transplanted or
replaced with as large a tree as is practical from a choice of varieties offered to
the homeowner at a location of his choice. A homeowner would be afforded
the options listed above for trees removed from private property, or the
homeowner could seek actual compensation which could offset any proposed
assessment.
r. Possible street removal and conveyance of right-of-way on Pontiac Place
north of Cheyenne, and Pueblo Lane south of Mohican at Mohican Court.
The Task Force is of the opinion that it may be desirable for the City to
consider the conveyance of right-of-way north of Cheyenne on Pontiac Place
and also of the easterly most Pueblo Lane right-of-way south of Mohican Lane
to the adjacent property owners. This would sa.ve reconstruction costs and future
maintenance costs.
s. Historical cost comparison of similar projects.
Residents within the London/Downing Street Reconstruction Project
indicated that the neighborhood was pleased with the results of that project.
The costs for that work were split on a 50/50 basis between the City aad the
homeowner. The homeowner's share of those assessments were $2,336 of
which $1,913 was attributable to street reconstruction and $423 was for storm
sewer construction.
t. Project Management
Project planning methods e�st whereby a network of activities and
durations can be diagrammed to produce a plan which can be used to maintai.n
an updated status for the completion of a project. Any of several network
planning methods may be used, with the "Critical Path Method" being the
�
preferred method. The Task Force recommends that to the extent �
reasonable and feasible, City staff working with the Contractor see:
in the project specifications a provision which calls for developing
maintaining a progress diagram and the appropriate supporting repc
progress diagram shall show the relationship of all of the activities
construct the project, with durations for each. Status reports shall 1
dated, and will show planned starting and completion dates for the
activities as well as the total project, and will show if the project is
extend over more than one consttuction season.
;
� The Task Force explored three ways to reduce the cost to the homeowner c
' reconstruction project. One is to reduce the total cost of a Reconstruction Project.
I is to increase the assessment area to include properties which benefit from the recc
� the project, and the third option would he for other funding sources to contribute t
,
i for reconstruction. By using a combination of these three cost reduction methods,
' of the project cost assessable to the individual homeowner can be reduced significz
� Th� Task Force recommends inclusion of the entire tributary drainage azea
,
Hills lst Addition, which would include properties not previously assessed. These
include the park property, the fire hall property west of Dadd Road, the propertie�
Dadd Road between Creek Avenue, and the properties which abut lots in Friendly
Addition south of Hokah Avenue. This would increase the actual number of propE
� assessed for storm sewer and thereby decrease the storm sewer assessments. It wo
make 1'� funding available for a proportionate share of the storm sewer project cc
� of the storin sewer system.
� �
��
In aa effort to reduce the overall cost to the properiy owner, the Task Fora
recommends that Decorah Avenue be reconstructed as a Municipal State Aid Stree
costs which qualify for MSA participation be excluded from the proposed assessmE
i levied agai.nst an individual property owner. By so doing, a significant portion of
� reconstruction cost is eliminated from the total assessable improvement cost.
i'
, Based on the above assumptions, City staff has projected that a property oR
; assessment for a Reconstruction Project, which meets the criteria of City Standard
� which receives concrete curb and gutter, to be approximately $2,700 (assuming thE
� significant' soil conection costs associated with the proposed construction) per lot.
properties {which are not on a Reconstructed Street but which are fully tributary to
storm sewer system, would be assessed approximately $800 per equivalent residen�
10
�at is
to include
>. Such a
�uired to
calendar
�
this
The second
struction of
the cost
hat portion
in Friendly
properties
east of
EIills lst
l also
for some
and all
it to be
r's estimated
eets, and
are not
proposed
lot.
TASK FORCE FINDINGS:
The Task Force finds that an improvement project designed to upgrade the streets to meet
the requirements of City Standard Streets, instead of simply an Overlay Project, would have the
following effects on Friendly Hills property owners:
a. Higher overall cost of construction.
b. More serious construction impacts on the neighborhood.
c. Longer relative construction period.
d. Greater relative neighborhood inconvenience during reconstruction.
Nevertheless, after consideration and discussion of all the issues presented at several
meetings over a periad of weeks, the Friendly Hills Task Force finds that the following are
compelling reasons to support a proposed Reconstruction Project to upgrade to City Standard
Streets.
a. City payment of 50 � of the cost of a Reconstruction Project as contrasted with 0°b
of the cost of any Overlay Project.
b. Revitali7.ation of neighborhood and improved aesthetics.
c. Encouragement .of residents to initiate and complete improvements to their private
residences. �
d. Increased property values and prevention of property value deterioration.
e. Elimination of boulevard ditches and dangerous damaged culverts.
f. Visual and physicai definition to roadways which aid driving and parking
movements.
g. Reduction of damage to property from vehicles and consequent reduction in
mai.ntenance cost.
h. Creation of a storm water drainage way within the road.
i. Extension of pavement service life for streets with concrete curb and gutter.
Facilitation of street maintenance activities and associated cost reductions with
concrete curb and gutter.
11
k.
Affording an opportunity to conect unsuitable subgrade conditions. �
Reduction in ice problems cluring cold weather.
; TASB FORCE RECOn�IlV�NDATIONS:
,
�
� Upon careful consideration of all the concerns expressed by the neighbo
Hills Task Force recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council prompfly
Reconstruction Project, consistent with Task Force Findings, to upgrade the str
� Friendly Hills neighborhood to the requirements for City Standard Streets, incli
; and gutterf and storm sewer.
� i
�
i
MSM:
;
;
12
od, the Friendly
�ler a street
�� ia the entire
�i� concrete curb
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 94
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FRIENDLY HII.LS TASB REPORT,
ORDERING PREPAI�TION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR HEARING FOR
FRIENDLY HILLS 1ST, 2ND, 3RD ADDITIONS, PAGEL ROAD
AND HAZEL COURT STREET RECONSTRUCTION
(IlVIPRO`'IIVIENT NO. 92, PROJECT NO. �
WHEREAS, the Friendly Hills Task Force has submitted their report to the City
Council with respect to the proposed reconstruction of Friendly Hills lst, 2nd, 3rd Additions,
Pagel Road , and Hazel Court, to-wit:
The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of ea.sements and
the grading, stabilization, diainage and bituminous surfacing, construction of concrete
curbs and gutters and storm pipes on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter
more particularly described.
WHEREAS, the area. proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated withi.n
the City of Mendota. Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, .and is more particularly descrihed
as follows:
Friendly Hills lst, 2nd, and 3rd Additions and all property
abutting Pagel Road and Hazel Court
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVFD by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, Minnesota. as follows: �
That the report of said Friendly Hills Task Force be and is hereby received.
2. That the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a
feasibility report as to whether said proposed improvements are feasible, and as
to the estimated cost of said improvements.
3. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Z�esday, December 6,
1994 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter, at the Mendota
Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve in the City of Mendota Heights.
4. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City Attorney, be and is
hereby authorized and directed to prepaze a notice of said hearing and to cause
said notice to be published and mailed to owners of the properiy situated within
said area, all in accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes.
i
� �
t
1
Adopted by the City Council of the City of 1Vlendota Heights this lst day of
i
��
Alirai:
�
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HIIGHTS
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
, 1994.
i
I TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
i i� •
Mayor and City Council
Tom Lawell, City Administ
October 28, 199
SIIBJSCT: Pentel Antenna Discussion
I
i
I
DISCIISSION
�
Ori October 4, 1994 the City Council further conside:
application of Sylvia Pentel, 556 Fremont, for a free-st;
ham radio antenna/tower. At that time, Council discusse�
safety;issues surrounding the antenna/tower request and �
that the health, safety and welfare of the community cou;
best pr"otected in this instance with a roof mounted ante�
tower.�
Mr. John Bellows, legal counsel for Ms. Pentel, was
at the,meeting and agreed to investigate the feasibility
an installation. In addition, Council directed our stru�
enginee.ring expert, Mr. Geoffrey G. Jillson, P.E. to ana:
feasibility of this installation as well. Attached plea;
reports from both Mr. Bellows and Mr. Jillson.
�
It appears from the reports that commercially avail<
mounted antenna towers are available, but at heights whi�
less than Ms. Pentel's requested 68 foot height. Additi�
public safety concerns, related to the proximity of eleci
powerlines, are raised in Mr. Jillson's report and shoulc
discuss`ed by Council at the upcoming�meeting. It is ant:
that Ms�srs. Bellows and Jillson, City Attorney Eric Nyst�
radio expert Dr. John DuBois will be present at our Novei
meeting.
1
ACTION RS4IIIRED
�
�
Council should review the two attached reports and :
discuss'with Mr. Bellows and Mr. Jillson their findings �
relate to the minimum safety criteria necessary to erect
antenna/tower.
I
d the
ding
the
ncluded
be
a/
present
of such
tural
yse the
e f ind
ble roof
h are
nal
ical
cipated
om, and
ber 1st
�hould
.s they
the
Oct 18�1994 02�15PM FROM LAW OFFICES TO 94528940 P.a2
; � ,
JOHN B. BELLOWS� .�R.
ATTORN£Y AT LAW
600 CAPIT/►� CENTRE
366 WABASHA STREET NORTH
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �5102
{6I2} 227•875i
October 18, 1994
Mr. Eric J. Nystrom
Winthrop and Weinstine
3200 Minnesota World Trade Center
30 Seventh Street E
St. Paul, MN 55101
RE: Sylvia Pentel v. city of Mendota Heights
Court File No: 3-91-123
Dear Mr. Nystrom:
At the request of Mayor Mertensato and the Council, I have
inquired as to the availability of roof toWers capable of
supporting an antenna for amateur radio purposes. My research
indicates that there are two manufacturers of such towers: Create
Design Company, Ltd. and Glen Martin Engineering. It is my
understanding that Create Dc�ign Company, Ltd. is a JapanQSQ
company whose main U.S. dealer is Electronic Distributor�s
Corporation at 325 Mill Street, Vienna, virginia 22180. Glen
Martin Engineerinq is located at Rt. 3, Box 322, Boonville,
Missouri 65233.
The tallest toWer available through Create Design is their model
CR45 - a 14 foot 9 inch toWer base to top. According to the
manufacturer, this to�er Nill withstand 90 mph winds.
Unfortunately, Create Desiqn was unab2e tv provide any
information as to the enqineering data supporting the.ir claim.._�_
Furthermore, thair towers do not�have any radial ice ratings.
The tdllest Glen Martin Engineertng roof tower is 17 feet 5
inches base to top. This tower is rated as handling 12 sq. feet
of antenna at 85 mph. Again, the manufacturer was unable to
provide any engineering data supporting their claim and had made
no calculations as to the capability of the tower under the
conditions of radial ice.
Notwithstanding the absence of engineering data as to these
towets, it should be noted that the tallest of the two towers is
17 feet 5 inches. This to�aer'together with the heiqht of Ms.
Pentel's h�me would only yield a height of 40 feet. Forty feet
is a height inadequate for reliable amateur communications.
Based upon the information available, it does not appear that a
.
f �
i IOct 18�19j4 02�15PM FROM LAW OFFICES TO 94528940
1
� ,
. +
#
. ,
i
i
� �
! Mr. EriC J. Nystrom
i october 18, 1994
• Page Two
, �
; '
i
1
roof-mounted tower is commercially available which
; reasonably reliable amateur cominunicatians.
! Yours truly,
i
JOHN; 8. BELLOWS, JR.
JBB:tal
Cc: Ms. Pentel
', Mendota Heiqhts - T. Lawell, City Administrator
i i
f
P.03
permit
10/2i/94 13:05 F.� 612 933 3�36
C1U�
El�[GIIVEERING
CORPORATFp1�t
1 Q02 Mainscreec
Hopkins, MN 55343
612-933-&'t 6'f
GUY ENGINEERING -►-�-� h1ENDOT� HEIGHTS C�'002 '
MECHANtCAL
STRUCTURAL
G.EOTECH NICAL.
MACHtNES
FOREIVSIC
EYALUATiON OF
PROPOSED HAM RQDIO ANTENNA INSTALLATION
RE: PENi"EL
CITY OF MEND07A HEIGHTS
SUPPLEMENT�41. REPORT NO. i
GUY ENG[NEERI11tG CORP. Ft�E No. 94-002-024
OCTOBER 26, 9 994
.._��,
GUY ENGiNEERlNG CORPORATION FILE No. 94-002-024
SUPPLEMEM"A! REPORT NO. l; PRQPOSFD RAD10 ANTENNA INSTALLATIO
RE: PENTEL APPLiCATION O
f
1 �-
; i .
��, Pursuant to your request �rve have reviewed ihe information provided by Mr. Bell
� Ms. Penteli as relates to proposal to install a roof movnted anienna_ We have re
ber 18, 1994 letter from Mr. Betlows, regarding roaf movnt antenna instaliation
; preliminary investigation into these types of towers. Our comments folfaw;
i '
Mr. BeElflws indicates that his research finds that there are two manu�Factc�res o�
� mounted applications. Mr. Beilows cites company's "Gten Martin E�gineering" �
sign Company, LTD". The two manufiacturers noted by Mr. Bettows provide #ov
rePorted by him to be 14 foot 9 inch tower and a 17 foot 5 inch tower. These �
carry an antenna of the size proposed in the amended application at a height on
af approximately 40 feet. We find an additional manufacturer, "ROHN" which i:
turer of towers. There may be add�t�onal manufacturers as roaf mounted antern
' common. � '
The reference io the 90 mile per hour w�nd speed far the towers cited by Mr. Bi
take into account the considera#ion that the antenna would he located at a fowe
mounted situation which wauld accordingly resuit in a reduction irt wind loads_
Proposed Antenna; �
The propased antenna, Modei "TH11 DX", mancrFactured by "Telex Hy-Gain" is c
ing and transmitting on 10,12,15,'[ 7 and 20 rneters. The original pTopasai was
; with twa separate smaifer antennas. "Telex Hy-Gain" maices numerous multi-ba
antennas for HAM radio operations. The proposed modei is the largest multi-bar
manufactured by "Tetex Hy-Gain". This results in the highest wind loading and 1
cupied by the antenna.
; .
Review Of�Te(ex Hy-Gain Antenna Lrterature;
, We teviewed technical materiais provided to this of�ce by Telex Hy-Gain of Linc
posed antenna is a model "TH11 DX" antenna. We find in the iiteratvre prov;dec
that there are numerous antennas mancrfactured by Hy-Gain (9 antennas) which
bands prop`osed in the subjeci appS'rcation. The mode� "TH1 � DX" is the largest �
type antennas manufactured by Telex Hy-Gain and has a wind surface ioading r�
square feet. The remainir�g models with the exception of "Log Periodic" antenn�
antennas b'oth dimensio�ally and in surface area for wind laading purposes.
� f
TF�e other models of mvlti-band beam antennas manufactured by "Telex Hy-Gair
smaller and serve the same bands. For exampte, the "Tetex. Hy-Gain" model "TF
band beam� antenna which captures 10,'15 and 20 meters. This antenna has a �
rating of 7.'4 square feet, approximately half of the wind laad of the proposed m
modei, the ;TH3JR has a surface wind load �ating of 3.4 square feet.
PAGE2of4
BER 26, Z 994
ws on behaTf of
iewed the Octo-
and have made
cowers fior roof
nd `Create De-
ers which are
No towers could
:op of the house
a U.S. manufac-
a instatiations are
ows does not
height in a rooi
�able of receiv-
• an instaltation
beam
beam arrtenna
�est spaCe OC-
�tn, NE_ The pro-
to this office
;ervice the fnc�..�:.
F the vi-band
:ing of 7 2_5
s are a1f smatier
are generalIy
MK2" is a tti-
�d surface load
lel. Another
�00� � SZH9I3H �ZOQu3IQ ��-t 9uI2I33NI9h3 Til9 9tfiL LC6 '.Ts Ik,-T So�r.'[ fifi/L7./(1T
10/27/9� 13: 06 F.� 612 933 3436 GUY ENGINEERING -+-►-� �iENDOT3 HEIGHTS � a0� �
GUY.ENGINEERIrIG CORPORATION FIE.E No_ 94-002-024 ' PAGE 3�of 4
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT NO. i; PROPOSED RA�IO ANTENI�IA 1tItSTALLATI�N •
RE: PENTEL APPL(CLLT1011t OCT06ER 26, 1994
According to "Tefex Hy-Gain", alt of their '[ 5 and ZO meter antennas can be canfigured to receive
i 2 and 17 merers as we(I. Therefora the tri-band antennas manufactured by Telex Hy-Gain which
a�e smailer antennas with substantiaity lowe� wind Ioading are atso capabie af servicing bands
which are serviced 6y the proposed antenna.
VYin� Loads;
Wind foading, as we have indicated in prior reports and City Counci( meetings, is the critical con-
sideration with these type of. structc�res (antennas and towers}. Ice accumulatian on the antenna
and the supporting strtrc#ure adds weight and increases the surface wind load rating. Wind load-
ing is reduced at tower heights. At 40 feet and befow, the wind pressure is reduced such #hat the
ability of antennas and towers to carry ice is increased. The effect of Iowering the height of the
antertna to tRis levei at this partieular instaitation makes it practical to instail comrriercia{Iy avaif-
able towers on the roa'F of a house.
Proximrty Of Electrica[ i.ines;
The propased antenna tower is made of steel. Stee[ is a conductor of eiectricity. L:ocation of a
tower in close pro�amity ta electrical iines creates a situation where in tE�e event of either the
antenna or tower fai[ing, contacting with power fines cou(d occur. This woutd resuft in an ex-
tremeiy dangerous condition. The potential'danger lacating towers within faliing distance of
power lines is well recognized as is nated in the follawing;
Review Of Instal(ation Instructiorts And Wamings By 'ROHN'; .
"Rohn" is a major manufactu�e of towe�s ranging from smal[ towers avaifable for amateu� pur-
poses t�rough very iarge commercial towers_ Review of the technicai literature and drawings pro-
vided to this offce by Rohn Towers finds the folEowing warning on all of their tvwer drawings;
"Do not instaIl or dismantEe towers within falling distance of
electrical andlor telephone lines".
Review of the proposed tocation for the installation afi the antenna and supporting structure finds
ti�at tF�e power tines wE�ich serve the house and tetephone wires enter fram the r.�ar or south yard:.
and attach to the raof Ievel southeast corner ofi the house. The locatiort of �ower wires retati�e
ta the propased Iocation the tower is approximatety t 5 feet and certainfy within range ot contact
of tfie tower in the event af a failure.
Gfen Mactin Engineering Roof Mount Tower;
Glen Martin Engineering, Boonvil(e, Missouri, manufactu�es three roaf mount antenna towers. The
largest is there '[ 8 foot madel which is �ated at approximately 12 squar� feet antenna wind load-
ing at 90 rrtph. With ice Ioading, the surface wind loading wvuid ir�ctease such that the proposed
antenna would be too Ia�ge for the tower. This would require seiec#ion of a smaller antenna such
as tiie "Telex Hy Gain" TH5MK2 with surface wind [oad rating of 7.4 squara feet or ihe "Te{ex
i i
10/2i/9� 13:Oi F_� 612 933 3436 GLrY ENGINEERING ��� 1�ENDOT� �
�GUY ENG[NEERINtG CORFORATiQN FfLE No. 94-Q02-024
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IItO. 1; PROPOSED RADIO ANTENNA INSTALLATION
RE PENTEL APPLICATION �C�
I �
IHy Gain" TH3JR with suriace wind toad rating of 3.4 square feet. 8oth of these
band beam iantennas which cauld be instailed on the referenced roof mount towE
I[oading. +
� �
Summary; {
�Ou� invesrgation regarding roaf mounting af HAM radio antennas has found the
,, 1
1) There are numerous combinations of antennas and towers avaitabie for HAl
{ rons whici� can be mounted on the roof of a house and which conforrn witJ
heam �type a�tenna proposed. A roof maunted towe� which is anchored an�
roof of the structure wit� no attachment to the ground could carry multi-ba
antennas sim�tar to t{ze antenna under consideration at heights of approxim<�
' this location_
; ! •
2) Ou� investigation finds that there are mul�ipte manufacturers Q# roof mount�
towers and that there are numerovs antennas avaiiabfe which service the f%
i that wouid be served by the instailation currently under consideration. '
;
3) instatlation of beam antennas at heights of 40 feet or less reduces the load
wind and the wind 'effects of ice accumvlat►on. The 40 foot leve{ is a brea!
wind load tabtes o# the� buitding code.
4) ii is ��commended by major manufacturers of a�tenna towers that towers i
, locations whera the tower or antenna is within fa1[ing distance af power an�
Tower iiterature wam that tawers falting against power lines Could result in
5] The p�oposed i�stallation would place the tower and antenna welf within t[�
tF�e tower ar antenna wouEd contact power lines in the event of a fall.
�
� I
6) instal[ation of a roof mounted towe� af approximately 18 feet in height suci
; tured �by "Gien Martin Engineering" with an antenna of the size of the "Tele
madefs TH5MK2 OR TH3JR is practical in this application. The antenna co
� a[ocation on the roof of the house an adequate distance away from the po
� enter at tF�e southeast comer.
I I �
IGHTS �005
PAGE 4 of 4
ER 26, 1994
antennas are tri
:r and carry ice
owing;
radio opera-
the muEti-band
guyed to the
3 beam
efv 40 feet in
d antenna
�auencv bands
ngs imposed by
: point in the
ot be installed at
I telephone lines.
injury or deati�.
range in which
as manufac-
Hy Gain"
!d be instalted in
�er lines wf�ich
.�
To:
From:
Subject:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
��� �
October 7, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis t�
Planning Case No. 94-34: Schneemaa - Variance to Fence Height
Yard
DISCUSSION
, �
Mr. Chris Schneeman, of 1561 Park Circle, appeared before the Planning
Commission at their October meeting to request a Variance to the fence height in a
; yard. Mr. , Schneeman is proposing to fence his rear yard, includi.ng a gate with an
�(8') rose arbor. Because Mr. Schneeman lives on a corner lot, one of his side yard
treated as a front yard. Any fence in a front yard may only be thirty six inches (36
; height. Tlie proposed fence is forty eight inches (48") in height, thus requiring a fe
; height variance. A variance is also necessary for the proposed rose arbor. (Please
attached Planner's Report and Application.)
.
The Planning Commission expressed no concerns with Mr. Schneeman's prc
fence his rear yazd. The Planning Commission suggested a finding of fact that this
fence is a legitimate improvement to the yard and the neighborhood, and that it pro�
screening and safety for the yard. The Commission suggested that the rose arbor is
� considered unique and should not be confused as a precedent for a fence height.
; ;
! RECONIMENDATION
;
� +
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to waive the required public heari.ng, a
; Schneeman had submitted all the required signatures of consent. The Planning Con
, voted 7-0 to recommend that City Council approve a fence height variance to allow
; eight ' h " fence with aa eight foot (8') high rose arhor, as proposed on site p]
cto r 18, 1 9.�� � ���,
, �
ACTION REOUIItED
� �
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to implement the
1 recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should pass a motion to establis
, proposed findings of fact and to approve a fence height variance to allow a forty ei
:(48") fence with an eight foot (8') high rose arbor, as proposed on site plans dated ��
i 18, 1994. �
��
i
�
�
�
��� � � 1�e.0.�
Front
foot
0
1Vir.
a forty
ans dated
the
rt inch
mcoierc,i:.�rr.i�
CONSULTING PLA[VNLRS
LANDSCAPE ARCFIITECTS
30Q FIRST AVENUE IJORTH
SUITE 210
MINNEAI'OLIS, MN S;ia01
G12•339•3300 ,
PLANNING REPORT '
DATE:
CASE NO:
�
APPLICANT: , -
� �,
)l:Al1V1V: :
�
;TION REQUESTED:
PREP
BY: - .
� CONSIDERATIONS
October 24, 1994
94-34
Chris Schneeman
1561 Park Circle
Variance Front Yard
C. 7ohn Uban
i +
� Background � , _
� Mr. Chris�Schneeman desires to place a fence around his rear yard, which is a corner
I already has raised planted gardens, play equipment, and compost bins extending beyo
the house `in the side yard. As viewed by the neighbor to the south, much of the rear ya�
be clearly seen from the road and adjacent area. The combined lot frontage on Par]
comer lot condition is approximately 245 feet. All of the frontage is considered fron
proposed fence extends into about 33 feet of that front yard condition. Front yard fenc
� to 36 inclies in height and the applicant is proposing to construct in the front yard area
� 48 inches' in height with decorative caps on the fence posts that extend 6 inches abov
�
i Some photos and information have been submitted showing the views of the back
I� proposed picket fence. The fence has 2 inch spacings between 3 inch wide boards in
area. Also in the front yard is a gate with a rose arbor over the top of the gate. Sinc
� front yazd its height must be noted in any variance given. The height of the structure
1 approximately 8 feet high. The applicants were going to submit additional drawing
Commission review clarif3ring the type of fence and azbor in the front yard.
When the fence location is not in the front ard setbac it chan es to a 5' 4" hei h1
Y �, g g
boards and 1" spacings. .
( �
�
i
Height ,
ot. The yard
id the face of
3 activity can
Circle in the
yard and the
�s are limited
a fence 40 to
; that.
yazd and the
he front yard
; this is in the
�ppears to be
for Planning
6" wide
;
. . , S . , m 2 "%p� "�• - . ` �+o., , _; o . _ 6 = � - �
� Q` /�,av.S� �°j �6.65 ��9o.sg ��M 150 153 �
� ' � �� 36.5.1 , o �r; •�
4�+�i.�_N r,�° q, o� R 0 A D � J'
-.o � o a �; 6"'� 6 u ._. I O � �; '2��3 8 � i e? i a � I—
., w � ,
''�s . � � , i;i .. ' J• _��:. -�' � o OC � 2 �o -� N U
� _ :� iS.0 _ LL) 16 �' Q
c' 7 � Q::J � � o �, i N I4Q �
` �-� -
.! - � 7� �-' �50 o g � V`' 3
. . � - --•-- � � ------ ,, �50.1.:• :+�� -- 34.0�� p�� 4 � �
, o g ' � � �; ( ? � 3 N . o.� . o ,� . - o
' 17 i � � 5� � 166 ��O b� c- I 4 G
- j .. - -- � ��• •--
. ,� p � ` 7 �+ � .' �,N � �
' �� � 9 � '� � 3 � fo � �% o � y r Ir.
- / - 17�1 6.; 150 95 218 �8�,� � 2�3C °i 5
T i�`77 85 -� 123 108 108 108 108 108 ����
� � - S --EAST 930.�6-- � - � �
00 9- ,4 3 : '
i77� � 2 3 4 �5 ,� 6 7
� , Y ? o- - � ' �
.9c, s- ` 1� 1• A`. J' � rD- I ��
, � p .<
I �If1 N
+ � �. �oio-e � : iss.s� m ,`p�p,CE j ORIVE, " � .
� ..,.. - -- -- 375 . 6 � �� �
�' ws�s N.�arzo'et1�. azs.�i : ��692 QP` • 4 ( Z
� 3T • --1
;' , - .
� � 4 • 5 � 5 �
' q 6
,_ �. 3 _ . 3 2
F/D w - - � .
- � BLUFF CIRCLE ---- -- 7 . � �.
. „ �
q � � t fo� � D
� 0
. a �, �-' (9 Lp �� v,
E� o
�= N 2 9 D p`8'�� �°� 22 �
D 18 �
,. �4 ` .
�
r =0 4` � � . - PARK . o _
.Q `:� I - P ., ' 9_ , '� 23 � � -
h 8 ' �
° ' SUBJECT PROPERTY °D
. .o o,� _
�
s �`' ' c� 24
� J
i y ° 7 NORTH m �
� ���:�; . SCALE 1"=200' 13 I4
�;° � 25
,; �. ,
.�
� - w �` ' � � .
,
� � . 6 � { . E:.�•,��s�••w. sZ..• � - � -
_ �_ - - �
D s, , m , - - : 2�.r^:• _ �
i� � a"� yT,• 5 4 D .....: ,' ; .�7c�Gt Z1YaC/7 ( _ �
�, °�o� � . 7� ' � �� / Ac. , � �
�, ,� � , ..Q.» p4,0-07 i i
�
. a </ ' ••,r i 'tdc . ,
V T5�1[• �i��� ,���
s�•� �,. ^
. �+'
'z9.ly � M 2 -
, � �?' .
0
� 5.09�40� S�'L 2
. • � _
C
\ . .
Vi�L�G� oF V _ ,
�I MEt�C7vTA H6�VHTS � �
�` 2� AG � " ' 4
FU � � �
N~,' ,Z'^•,�.2� .
A1 �� G
3
,TD i. `
� �ti; G/47-E
STf! TE
:p w � R�v e a OF
_ j,� • � r+
: �:�J/NN•
= i�6.z. � o�.4c
5.69910'37W. '
} w.n9°
�f '
• «h
'O'
_ .' � h .
��� E. • / .
� i-IEAN Sm N
� / Ac •
a 03!-O7, �•� ' j
�
/� 90�� .
L. Abvi. f .�' � 1,
SHRur- a - I ,;'
� b ' . .
, •• ,�`^o QI
= Q
2� E. • 60 �
�
1 � I
2 [`
� 7 � C.�• 1 ,
Letter of Intent
Variance Request for
Christopher K. and Catherine H. Schneeman
1561 Park Circle
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
, � �
' The purpose of this letter is to explain our interest and need in obtaining a variance f
Heights ordinances. We are including with this letter the following:
�
� 20 copies of blueprints (to size) as prepared by our professional landscape �
� 20 copies of our fence bid from Viking Fence specifying materials to be us�
� Signahues of consent from our nine (9) surrounding neighbors,
' � Photographs of the area, and of a"to scale" template,
�$50.00 variance application fee and application.
I
`, Our home is situated on a corner lot on an interior cul de sac in the Park Place neighl
Mendota Heights. After living for four (4) years on Theresa St. near city hall we fin
new home and moved in September 1990. We have five (5) children ages 12 throu�
We get along marvelously with our neighbors and are proud of the area. We are inti
maintaining the open and friendly look and feel of the neighborhood.
� ' •
We are requesting a variance from the restriction on "front" yard fence heights of 36
more. We feel that due to our need to properly contain our dog, and to satisfactoril
back yard area (gardens, swingset, compost, etc.) we will need a fence of 48 inches ii
area. Also; the dog is currently tied with a rope when outside, which has caused prot
' and 3 yeaz old neighbor children who frequent the yard, and are prone to becoming t�
rope. This has become a safety issue. Finally, we feel that the existing restriction cr�
hardship on the full use of our property that property owners of other similazly sized
' you will see from the photographs, the azea in consideration functions as our backya
� The fence style we plan to use should improve the look of the yard for those approa
; enclose aspects of the yard that are not so attractive while adding a pleasant "finishe
, not take the look or feel of a privacy fence as it will be of picket (lx3) style, and sc�
downward four (4) to eight (8) inches. The non restricted area style will also be sca
be lx6 cedar boazds with 1 inch separations. This azea will be 1 foot higher than th
Four by fow cedar posts will be used that will rise above the top of the fence appro
inches. Posts will be topped in a"french Gothic" style. The entire fence will be sta
; grey to match the home.
;
An important highlight of the fence and landscape will be a rose azbor and gate that
' main entry,to the back yazd. Architectural drawings of the azbor aze enclosed for re
; the arbor will not be installed until spring 1995 it is currently situated in the restricti
requesting that the council also consider including the arbor in the variance.
t
� We aze taking caze to make sure that this fence is of top quality and com ements th
' neighborhood. We are open to helpful suggestions. Thank yo r yo considerati
,
�
,
�
i
a �,
I Catherine H. Schneeman /o —/� -�� 'st pher K. S
�
1 j
, ,
I ,
Mendota.
rhood of
ly built a
5, and a dog.
;sted in
ncnes or
enclose our
the restricted
lems with 2
n�led in the
�a
enjoy. As
1ing. It will
" look. It will
lloped but will
e�picket section.
ximately six (6)
ined in a light
ui serve as a
�w. Although
zone. We are
City oi
.,..,.,� 1��i+�ndota Heigh�s
- - APFLICATION FOR CONSIDERATXON
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. �-t-.� �
Date pf Appiication . ��- /�-�`�`�
Fee Paid lca-11- 9u1 lb SO. o� �
Applicant Name:
aaa��: /5�
z�--f2.-h..� i'Y�c.� �'7
(I-ast)
f'"t,t Y� �� v'e./
(Number & Street}
Owner Name: �1� �P�.•Y1�uz.. i2..
(I,ast? '
Address: ��� % ,F�Ct �
(Number & Street)
Street Location of Praperiy in (luestion:
Legal Descriptian af Froperty:
T�pe of Request:
Rezoning
Conditionat Use Pernnit
Ccanditianal Use Permit for P.0 D.
Plan Approval �
Comprehensive Flan Amendment
Applicable City Ordinance Number
F'�resen#. Zo�ing. a�f-Propert� Present Use
S �7 �Y'
t�
_,rrt• _-� _� �c — c.v u ~,�-
�- �� � �s��l,
tstate� (Zin)
i,�t_��Eai'�f�.. �
�
�°� .�. ��U S�'"1 / �
(State) (:Zap)
� Vazian.ce
Su'bdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
Section
Froposed Zoning of Property ; Propased Use
.
I hereby declaze that a2i s"tatements made in this request a e addi anat
materiat a� true. „ �
(Signature of A ii t}
,._. /
. (�ate)
(Received by - Titte) - .
11U1 �lictoria Curve � 1N,endota Heights, 1�I'�I •�5118 452 • 1850
u
1Q107/94 �15:54 FAX 612 452 8940 MENDOTA HEIGHTS
� � ,
i 1
� �
� 1,
�
; ,.,, , 1��e,ndota Hei
� # 8It3IQATQREB OF CQNSENT $QA V'ARIANCi3 REOIIES�.'
t ,
i T8: � The P�.anning Camm�.ssion, City of Mendota He3.ghts
.
FROM. � Property �wners o� 1�4a f ��-c-�- C��-4 e
.
� �L'r1S �tL►Ke�r+�a.y�
RE:
a'�, o�.. � c h-a r t.r.�'�` l,� �n �c L-,
� i-e.y v tv'�S e�. ��•r lo. W t,12. �
s {+
Vl CJ1,� I l/� �_ '�c'6 � � '
�
I
i
�
�
We the unders�gned have reviewed the plans for
� : and understand the �
cand txans af the reauestec� variance for� �'en
we nave no on�eczxons �o r.nis requesc ana ao ne
written consent and consent ta waiver of publ.ic
�
sincerely.
,
r
NAME (P].ease Prin.tj
i
v T`t+. 4��G1 LrGtSSeE.WQ a-sy �L�S'Y�V
i �
�� ci�l d..�.�9 Mx(�5�sa���e.ke.�
�.��r-�- �� ! �,ec�.�, Swe.v�sa r.
��-w�S �:.tS'�v� 'S4*.�.Q.� (�,s+��.+
���.�.�� 5� �.-�-
_`��_
�-E�-�'-v� v� k�-{�,�,,�n �..�-e 1
< —r
1 �
lsa$` l� $� ; �-lcµ��r�we C1>-'�"SCS+�►
�..� ,� 4 � �-y �� � �.� h
��."
t�... ii n rt�' a� ��csN ��oc35sL
� 403
��
Y�L.ty �n T,'j l v� :
�
► g�ve ur
�ring.
�,DDRESS {2NCI,. LOTj
��' ��""��"k t�lo.caz. lif -
��i�' j�aa'k t�la-Ce. (7r_
7S-s�t � i'd`-k G'�.-t c�
� S j`"iS � �c�. r � <` � r�c (.Q
lS�o � �'�-r k �', v-c (.e
t� �o� (o-r-�- �crcCr�
i�iuiu� �i�.rk� �crc�
i "S�� �� C- k � cr�c(r�
�S Z� ��-r�. �� c�.tQ
� �
$ "
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, 1Vily' • 551i8
,
; _
: �
C ity o�
.�.,,, • 1Viendota Heights
0
October 26, 1994
Mr. Christopher Schneeman
1561 Park Circle
Mendota Heights, N� 55120
Dear Mr. Schneeman:
Your application for a Variance will be considered by the City
Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, November 1, 1994. The Council meeting starts at
7:30 o'cloek P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
that your application will receive Council consideration .
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Asaistant
RLB:kkb
£nclosures
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
��� Ci�
..., ��. • 1Viendota Hei
;
�, ;
� �
�
October;20, 1994
�
I
Mr. Christopher Schneeman
1561 Park Circle
Mendota�Heights, N�T 55120
I
Dear Mr. Schneema.n:
i ;
�Your application for a Variaace will be considered by the
� Commission at their next regularly acheduled meeting, whicl
held on Tuesda.y, October 25. 1994. The Planning Commissioi
atarts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here are City Hall in the
Chambers. You, or a representative ahould plan on atten
'meeting; in order that your application will receive Cc
consideration.
� {
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assiatant
a
�
i f
i
;RLB:kkbi
�Enclosures
' T (
y o�
�htS
will be
meeting
Council
ing the
anission
� 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 4�2 • 1850
' ' �
m
P��N v��
e
.. N d,��', .
_ .
..�..`I, .ow�t�R �r�w b.E.'f�I�rc11i3�--���A�f �
. . �Gir� e / ��s�. �-�w � ��� i� �.
.. 1., �'1U� I/t�00fJ ol� c,EdHR �(�AUB 2
q�- r�'(s�. • �Iv rr�M`�IDu�I� K�Jo'is,
_3. A�Li. �h�fG FJE�, �11S�W l� �A{.U,
��'�+ � . . _..: :.:. _: ._ ... .
,���F� CL04rjW 6..�'� r�is�
I�' Wl.ti� WI-(}I .p1�Gi�, {�VY -
I,A'T'f I� PAN�� .i'�GrNI�`"
��R�t rv wr�'N � K z�u. �•� _.
. . !C�dpR �w/o..'f.H.Fa�I�. KNo �_.....____.
4' Wio� �
�ANr� Pn�rH (N. .. �,j .�_�
-1��' v i��
v
��� nO� I`4 �'' . .p...
� /�'� IS
, � �oc1"Ev �°a5rs i�j ;; � � ^
J'- w�+.�. coMr� ur�o . . ��.: I�_ .�
' .U,A� 5 _' �/`�
. . .
. _ ��-� { o N ��i� , E��o AK o �T �s-� y3
p�Ts �s��� �z�� �r�oy�j
�
���
� ��'-ri��EMfit�l F�I��I�►
Pr���.� � pll�il� W►'T� r�17�
' � .... �fZ �� �. i ��all
', ,
� N � �� n�rc�J ,a�e���o�a�r', ��G.
, : . .. . . Jc�W� f�-. IRq�'�
GEUAt� s�A'f5 • ZX 2'S ,� � : , : .
� Do�IG�E z�.• �R� . � ...: �._ • ;; •
!
_.... .��fVING 0��?.�. AtJD � jC -
' ' ;
. (oxlo !3�'��'C oN /�K�oti . :_ ." :.:: �.
� ' : • ; '
. `� : . ! ; .
�
. : . . . � � s� -T
<, � � . x
!`L!� �r �1 _ _.... _.�. � -- _ - . _.__� : c
.. �r
V s .... �•�.�' '• � AO
���u�.
.__�• . �R�'cK i'�rl-�
i
Fj� �', �ir � /:� �� f � r .
� r
. � i.
; :����: /����::�,� 1�.► :�� ; -
���.� ���r.
� ►% ;� �J � -� ,
' r� -,l I�,r, I� � r .
.:� �� i•;,1 ;r t• .y ± � ��
/ "`� �/ � •i ,� r� y, ' ,..
i•�I' � �i �� • �a� .`l�('��I'� � ^ " i
,I(�:., , rl� .�,;.,,,� L[���/�►� �► , � � i
I � � . rl � �rr �� 1� IM � �
" _ ' '�' ' _
•� i� • � 1
-� , ;
�� :
. ,
i
� �
, l.
; t
j FENCE & CONS7RUCTION
i 250 FremoM Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55405
,
Rhone: (612) 377-2860
FAx: �s�2> sn�on
Date: � � / �'
,
CUstome�: �/"�7 �` !, r � �r7`��� ,_ �
Address: �- "S�.G ��a .� k C"' i.�
City; %�1 ts,Jo�o �"�: .�f �'` r ,�'''i
Fhot18: (hame} �. �.? f!S-c.� 7' {wark}
-.
Salesman: �%' c-� .x � � �--5 � �r_ .
Installation Address:
SPECiFiCATtCiNS: / fx,,� ��,�,�/c �f e �
S�i@ 'r c.il2f�C'� � f� .t � l�i'�Rf �P!'"'�� riC f� �� i� Or'%a �. .�� _ Height�� -�r.�'.
..; . � P � � i� � t „ ..�.v�r� / =� b
Spacing .� � t�p '` �'– Ceatiqg.s�c�ccr� Wir�suage.r.,�rx <-
� � � �-
Mesh Size ' Waii Thickness Line Posts -� "'
Gate Posts '� X`� Ends & Carners '�"� '` L1 Top RaiC �' "`
Bottom Rail � �` `� Gate Fra�te �� " `� �� tf� /-" °' � "`
�, _� , 4.AYOUT AND FENCE MEASUREMENTS �� ��'� ' J � �
j J � i
MATERIAI. DESGRIPTIOIV �'� l � � '
styte � ' - �. � � ! � � f�ap 7'0�
�
, End or Extra Post (number) � r,,.
�
ComeilBreaker �'osts {number.}, . . � . - � _...
�
Hook Ups;(number) ��G.vs" _,.,
� Gates {nurnber & sizes} �r � ..t �" -- �: % �-3 � ..0 � � 2.. _,.
� ��}c (,� – / –,,� ' �,u r��/ .�,. . MateHai Costs: _,
' J ^��'�.t�7,�.�( � Y �`t/t.eo'4'�.��..
� u��oR `� � n . .
, Linea! fest {includes gate areas� � `� � .� 1� {�Yj, +��-�l ��' . �s��S�
Hard hoies (concrete/btacktop) N�+Ne 'p�. �
Clearing/Other ,r�'� G•� e �-- �'�.A �,,�u.-+c� ��{5"; �'.: c �f,�
1 `-' )7-::l
t �.� L. �t .,2--L�'�t�or Cast:"—...
; i ha r & unde�stand the terms & conditions on the ` Total �
� r Ger ide af this cantract.
` ; 1/3 Down �'
, � }�
�
� ,-•--r � � ' � � "" t � Bat, on Comptetion. -�•�
; � ' : A r"r"._.... ,
� �-�'"`� �8uyers Signature Date
,
, ,
� '�:x ' f ' ,�
..S�=a%%vf�,
rJ'� ''Yi 7,� '
.,,�
# `'�„�t_e_
r��:. C t7
:,~ �7 i .�r ( <� .
, �`'���'"''� `�r,a. :y._��r .
�� ;�; ��. �`a"
� ti. ,: � ,.
..w..rK t �. - .._.._: � ..wo--�....�
Y
�� . :,�, � . � * �= � .� . . y�" '
.. t:,; �ry�.. t ii5d-�t �� , .ar'
Z ��• � ��/�!�`����_ �5.,�' ���i� h � , � ��Nt :. •
'`s. £ � }
� 1��� � �
" c � �• tt�'"� . � .s _..�. � ?�i 1 ,
; �, ���„�,+N.,
� `� �F�'��a�.ayy�.,��,.�• { �'r'' N
, ���'.!"'*'�h-�,`y�°!� ����1r�.
.��
. ��_ ��..b t" .. � rr"�'.,,�,.i�, - _ '
� �� , �::-- ....�-- � l I "�
11 -ti'.�
�.,���,;� � r�s�ii`f�"'r�
. I � ��`i.� .J y� . ..Y•,��( _ � . t �7'nT ,• � � _ • _
1 � , ' � �j r �f. _ � `i��. . .W
i •'7 �- �'�t W� _ �:-.-�i•, �•;�"� '�� � � -� � -
� ,_ _ _> _ � ' -. . . . t ,.": ' , " . .,
� .r ... - a ,�,,,,,Sk�oC.., -
t � ,'t :w-;:��'_ .
., pj��,�:�
� ; , . � k�a
....v_.:� s �'r�C��� ,�, ' ` • +�.�- , � �}� + �k� �`' t ,t
�i-,�..�.,.�n`"Y • ., +�'�G`Sn�'Y� f:t'�'.4Pr ��'1' � �*F' Y ?�'"� �.. ,�.y y,�+�'i ��+�'� ' �.
. r Y " ` �7 r.�c � � ```r e ���'t`'� i�i'���� ,y��'�.,�� � f�. x¢'�.',n _ .
� a 9.w G2� P w�.r J��'}� ��.�1 �K� ��r�� �Y rik l.� x ro{'z ?' �' . ,
. a ��`tt e�i' vxh�,:`+4�..�X`:`�3' y+ri'*�+.iL°''���r����'`'�' >��_ .-.
�.
:'
_,
•�,, `i. yw .�a i� d c�•�tl r '+-'�' �K4.���"x� iy,w�.j t�
. � � ..,. .:: _ s „ �� � -. r o' r .
> �> , «F` t `y� t ,��.� .
. .. � r
. .. , _.. .,� �. . � `
;
,. - �. , ' . . � .�:�. ..�, 1 J �:K a��' Pr,� . .
G
���
... . • ,+ `�b k i ,. �^ �T .
� � �. � r � � �� ,
Q. , `tt . �'.' . z �' tr,� ��� � ..�i
�' "� �kn�.f.�ii�` +tsi�� � �.5`+.',f.� �' � ,
'��'r., � �.i',r � � �,r. , �,
� , rs ,?
.� � nw hi" j.y,F=`�,.'�_„gl+�x, . ^ , e�
.1�s
�� `�"� � ,� . -._ � - r
�,� =� � •'=A� ._... -�-�
-.,, . µ, _ " i, l ,
I u � � ,; p -'
c+<-..,.�--i�= --�'---. _ -- .- ,.,_:���
��' �:"'"" _
'"s�3: ,+.:•>'-� _s��r'i;'-,w�'-'�"�-� -•
,y:,_it^`•• _
..' ,�.a�.
F�.'.�'r_ :,�.�: r-�....
� �...'�. � '�,�,t� "t:t��:t:�y.x %:�t'. `�' �H'� :
�� . .« ��
.�;._�,,,;3 �, "�`�:�.`���x�� >
� ��:��'��-: !� . � .u- 1
i �
�
This photogxaph sh
$tyle in �ws a "temp1ate��
propo�lon to the f�nce to illustrate the sca11� e
high and the high�st Yard. The cross bar sup ort
cedar fen�� p°int of the scallo � �� �6 inches� d
6 inches above h hi 1 su P is 48 inches. Fo�,
pport the fence and will exten� a by four
1 gh paint if the scallo „
�' p in a French pp��Xzmatly
Gaihic s�yje
f
�
� To:
, ? CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
j
� � MII��O
� 1 October�7, 1994
i
From:
�
Subject:
Mayor, City Council and City
Kevia Batchelder, Administrative
Planni.ng Case No. 94-31: United Church of Christ Siga Variance
DISCUSSION
1 ;
,
� Ms. Jeanne Lufkin, Moderator for Mendota. Heights United Church of Chri
appeared before the Planning Commission at its October 25, 1994 meeti.ng to requ�
variance to allow the addition of a message boazd to their existing sign. The churc
located at 680 Highway 110 and has received a variance in the past for its present ;
and lacation. Temporary siga regulations allow a sign of twenty five (25) square
; the applicant is proposing a message board that totals thirty two (32) square feet. I
attached Planner's Report and Application.)
Th� Planning Commission e�cpressed no serious concerns with the ro sed
P Po
board addition to the existing sign. They felt that the highway access, the high rat�
automobile speeds and the grades made it difficult for the Church to advertise thev
One Commissioner felt that the ordinance did not address the sign needs for non-rE
uses (churches) that are located in a residential district (R lA).
�
RECONIlVIENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to waive the required public hearing a
church had submitted all the required signatures of consent. The Planning Commi�
6-1 (nay: Friel) to recommend that the City Couacil approve the requested siga siz
to allow aftemporaiy sign (message board) of thirty two (32) square feet, as propo:
' ACTION �REQUIRED
� '
� Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to implement the
; recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should pass a motion to app
requested sign size variance to allow a temporary sign (message board) of thirty
square feet, as proposed.
t a sign
is
;a size
et and
lease see
message
of
events.
the
�ion voted
variance
the
(32)
r
1
� �•�•�� �� "
4 • � � •
�
�
{ INCOi:PUI:n'fCil
1 CONSULTINC PLANNERS
� + LANDSCAPE ARCIitTECTS
I 300 F[RST AVENUE NORTH
� � •• - SUITE 210
MINNEAPOLIS, MN >i.lpl
612•339•3300
j
'; PLANNING REPORT
;
DATE: October 24, 1994
I
, CASE NO: 9431
I
APPLICAI�Tr: Mendota Heights United Churc
!
LOCATION: 680I�'ighway 110 �
, I�
ACTION REQUESTED: � " Sign Variance
i
�
PREPARED BY: C. 7ohn Uban
� -
PLANNING CON5IDERATIONS
I
, Background
�
The Meadota. Heights United Church of Christ is located on the south side of H'ighR
surroundecl by the Dodge Nature Center. The church is not served by a local roa�
depends upon direct access to the state lughway system Because of the large highway
the lugh speed of traffic, and the grades around the church and road system, the normal
� setbacks required in the ordinance reduces the rea.dability of inessage signs for the ch
� The church has received a variance in the past for its present sign size and location 7
, is located ia an area that is more readable by the passing motorists and is a monument n
� the appropnate entrance to the church The applicant is proposing to add a message
� sign so that events at the church can be publicly noted on the sign. Many churches h
i boards in addition to typical signage. The effectiveness of the sign for tlus particular c
� location is the subject of the variance request. �
i
' The only �djacent land owner is the Dodge Nature Center and the City has received
i Gregory I�ee, the executive director of the Nature Center, that the center has no obj
` change in the church's sign. The Planning Commission may waive the public hearing.
' of Christ
y llo and is
but instead
- -- -� ��
sizes and
str�ucture
er noting �
rd to this
message
�h in this
letter from
�tion to the
October 24, 1994 Case 94-31 Page 2
Sign Variance
The property is zoned Rl-A and the proposed sign exceeds the size allowed for signs in the
residential district. In the past, the City has given temporary sign permits which permitted large
temporary signs to be placed in the otherwise open front yard of the church. There have been some
complaints to the City on the appearance of that particular sign solution. What the church is
proposing now includes integrating their messages on their existing sign which is aesthetically much
more appealing than the temporary sign solution. In residential districts, the sign height is limited to
ten feet and a name plate surface area. of twelve square feet is allowed. Also, temporary signs of three
months or less, are regulated to twenty-five square feet. The proposed addition to the church
pernianent signage is two by eight feet for sixteen square feet on two surfaces for a total of thirty-two
square feet. �th these message boards attached to the existing signage the overall perceived impact
on the neighborhood should be lessened.
A hardship for this variance could be viewed as the churches specific location and access to a major
highway without the benefit of local roads and that the church has received complaints about the
normal temporary signage that is allowed. Also, the signage has not been successful based on the
speed of traffic and the large right-of-way separation to the signage.
Although this is not a commercial activity, it is important that signage be kept in scale with the
building and the surrounding area. The area. surrounding the church is all open space and the sign is
reflective of the church architecture.
Action
The Planning Commission should review the applicant's request and make a recommendation to the
City Council.
,
--1 vi•' xp � � .:.�— . , . — _ . -1
�7C � `' . 1 � . . • � � � �--�_ . -i- ._ J — -�' '•�':: :
�- -• � • • � • • � � Q!� r �/ .1 _ � ' � • , v�::
•
• • ♦ • � � • . _.... � � �I.� r �. : ;.
� \ ��� , • • � . . • . � • . ' . . _. ..�� ; `• .1 � p •:.:i
� � p
` ,,— • � � � . . . . � -� ,..r
\ • • �N
• . . � -� .i • � � fQ . :';.f:
�� -- . � � . . . _ . �•;•:•, .
�o� w� . . � � . • .
� � • . � • . • • ' _ ; , • wi•. •s
-� / � • • I • • �f , � �
_ t i � • . / • • • • • • • • 7 • • • . � . � � • � • • � • • � • fj�'. . � ��.
� : •
�� N
( • •. • � � � • � • � • • • • � � • • • !: �'� . I � � ', N
' � NI _��• . ` ' � � •� . � � • '. .t: '��` :;�::
. '' . • '� - �i I •M; ...
� � • . ; • � . . . . - . . • . � il I �
- . . . .• � '�: •'
� . � � . � ' � � � . . . . . . . • • � ' ` i i. i _ �t[i •:.
� ■ : �' :
. . A
. . � • �tt; • . ' ' I' ��i�
• • � r• � • • ;'•: �
• T . � I . :"'
• • • � ♦ � � • � � 2 '. �
•
� � � • � � 1 I � s • • � . • f3 = ". -T+,—
• • • • (ItM�
�� • • • • , �, : �
• � .
�• � � � • • � • • ' � • � - ' i
• • i • � ' � • • � 'Q'
� 1.i'
�urt �.1 � M • • ��t't i " • • ; N
. • , � I;t:� • • . • • • • • • _
.
' t ' • � • �. �� � 1. • ' • H
� I � • • • • i • • • etwn s�r ' •': ;�.
. _, ' •
• � • � • � • 'o scr�o� «icH se�oo� j� .:
� .� . • �n��a •1•w •.
• • (�
1 ' i •' � � ���� • � • � .� � �•',
.� .� � • • .
•. • • �
� • .
., � � . . . . . . . • � • . "s
,. �r'_. ' ' .� + . = t' .�
..•. . ...;, -. . • .t
' �.
—� — _ — - o .�
IAY cs �— , ..•••�
, � + ( � �1. ��:;: •::� ' , � •_ 1 O• � � � ; ;, :=
, C SUBJECT PROPERTY . . :, :�
n -�.�8 . . � �:::��•��:��::::i :
.��. 1. �:;: :..� � • • .'
, ..,. . .... . .
� 1 -• e::;'�'•�'�:::� .
� . �:a �NORTH , ���
� � -1 SCALE 1"=200'� � ' :.p,�=
�. , � �
:m���� ; ' OODGE �\�� � NATIlIIE�� � CENTE • -�'
.� S � � ::;:; '
i , � ■ - _ _, � .;� .. . .. . � ,
(�.� � .�....... . �. � - __` ! . . ::�:�
� - -- - �� - = . ..
i - � � � � . �� ll`� .. - L � .:
• :� � � • • • • � ' • :•
( �� • • � • � � � `` � �' �.�/t� :
�/ • _� `J,� �' � � �� - - �- '.
• • •� • � - _ ` . S.� . - � � � • , • ••"" �'1
. �
• • . • 1 ��--, - • ����� ����
� ..•. . -._ .�� � � _. 1in��
. . , _,.. � , � ._.
�. . . :
. ,. �. � -
� ■ . . . - - ..- � , � :::..:.
` �- •. • _• ' � _ _ _ � I . . . _�.
I< • 1 • • •4' __ rowc� ea �urcM_�� ... 'J.. � .p ��r•••
rr. • • • .. _ _ 1 .
• _� • � ' ' � _ N Y.. . MARSH •a • • • • � � • � � � • I • � i :
� � I • � . —_ . . . . ! • A • •
�� • } • � � �� -PARK ' � • • • tn • • � • R. 1 •
• � 'i • • \ � • • • .'� ', -
� � . . . � � • • • I � . ...
. :. � _. I . • • � • -- : -• . • . • � � � i � . .
• � � • '1 . ';, � . -• � • . • . �.��,
� . � � • . • `_• _ . . • � . �..
• - .
. ,. . �. L_�.. . . .... •�. •. � . ..•�. , . � _ .� � • � ti'i..:
�- . _ -� _ . .
� � . ..• • • � •� � • • • • • � • � � i '� •���� � � ti.
• • • • • • , • � • • • • •• • � � '/• J - - �' • -- - � � * "�.'
1 i . . . , . . . . . • . '-�.. - = - . . � • .
/ � � • .� • • � • 4 � : - _ �� ��,,� -� a � i ; ��••� �
�• ��� • • � • • • • - `V" ."r • ! �
• • • • � � 1
• + � • ' • • • • � � • �• • Q � • � � � � /% � / • • �' • ��, �..,+•�'..
�� � � • • J � ! , • i � • • � � � � � � � � • • • � • •� Q��/ _ �� ' % � • � • � � ' t � • • • • �
• � • • • • �� • Qr �• � �.
� • / •
• • • • .�I�' � • '� • • •. •'• • • � • • .• . � ( • • � � • � .. S�.E��
i( • � • � i� ". _ • � •
• . . I/�I . . . •. ' � 6, �. • � _-•:'•-' .• � -• : _ �J�` •. ' ' -
• • • • • � � � �. _ . i , " ,,� . �,�:
•
• ' Q • � �' � i . � • t/ 4. _ :, ' •
� ~ � • � � • �, • • i a� ' .1 � ' • - " / �', � _ . � g �• ' - '•
� • � � • l � � . � � • � � • • • • � ' /'.� � � - ���� • �. i :' ;'
• • �� • • • � � 1 � � � - • • , � • . � ` `�- , `�•
• � / � • � • � ' g 1 � _ W •\ • ' • / • �' • _. �� � .
� I • � � "' ��•�' �/.� � � P � � � ... � _ • � . � .�-�. . � G � • �� \ ' � . � �. , `
,� � .
, I
REASONS FOR REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR TI� MENDOTA HEIGFTI
�
Mendota Heights United Church of Christ has a real and legitimate need to publicize
and fund-raising functions such as dinners, concerts, rummage sales, and other special o
� rules for te � porary signs are such that a temporary sign of the allowed size and positio
: be seen.
� �
� Going East on Highway 110 the road rises from Dodd Road as it passes our churcl
� know the sign is there, the message will not be seen. Please refer to the photogr�
, These were taken for our Rummage sale. The sign was up for 2 days. We estimat
abaut $600 on ow sale due to the lack of visibility. This sign was located 50 feet back f
of-way. #
Upon meeting with Paul Uban and Tim Danielson we discussed our various options ar
decided to �request a variance to our present sign as opposed to the use of a temporar
l
Mendota. Heights United Church of Christ is located on a very busy highway which is
speed limit�is 55 miles per hour. At this rate of speed a sign, to be useful needs to be
easily and safely seen. The right of way is 100 feet which automatically recesses the sign
We are proposing an additional sign boazd which will be attached under the sign already
would be capable of 2lines of inessage using 9" letters. Please note the attached drav
The space between the sign and the ground is 4 feet. The new sign will be 8 feet wi�
high. The plantings under,the sign will be trimmed to accommodate the sign.
i
I have spoken to Dr. Greg Lee of the Dodge Nature Center about the proposed sign.
problem with it but will need to bring it up to his board which will be meeting before
Commission Session. He is willing to come to the meeting on October 23 to sign t
papers. i
�
; ,
� If I can answer any other questions regarding this addition to the existing church sign, plE
�
to contact me at 455-8915.
, J
� Submitted by:
I " �%� /L' /L(' ,-t,L ��iL
v'� �
�
' Jeanne Lufl�in, Moderator
� Mendota Heights UCC
� �
� �
UCC SIGN
arious social
;asions. The
can scarcely
Unless you
hs atta.ched.
that we lost
�m the right-
lthe church
sign.
and the
•e it can
place that
and 2 feet
He sees no
he Planning
e necessary
feel free
C ity o�
,�,�,,,� 1��ic�nda�a Hei�,h��
�
" APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
CaseNo. a�'`�`��
Date of Application
I?� cr.��.r'a�vY �.�'e� n rl �, X.�, t� r,r��.ca y65 =$-9 � Paid ` t���z (����3 " Q i�.__..
Applicant Name:
Address:
(I-asc>
r�
(F'�) (MI)
� {.�"`���
tNumber & �treet) ' tC�ty} `(Statei t�P)
Qwner NaYue:
tLast) (F'irst) {M� �
Address:
(Number & Street) (G�ty) (State) CLiP)
�: s ..�� • ' .�- � ! �tt r. f .i .. ..
LCg1I DCSCII�'ltlOil Of PTOj�I'[j�:
Type of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Pemut
Conditional Use Pemut for P.0 D.
Plan Agp�val �
Comprehensive P2an Amendment
__,.� Vaiiance
Subdivision Approval
Wedands Permit
t�ther (attach explanation)
Applicable City Uradinance Number Section
Present Zoz�iag. o�•PmPertg '' 1g"' Present Use � r1 j'�',�! �
Proposed Zoning of Property : Proposeci Use �
I hereby dec�ar+e that at3 stai�nents made in this request and on the additional �
materia2 a� t.rt�e. ., ' �
(Si of Applicazrt) .
��� �,/r 1� �
c��� '
(Received by - Tit1e} • .
11U1 Victoria Curve •.�.endota Heights, 1�N • 55118 452•185U
, .i ;
' c�c�r oF r�rmoTa $�=ca�rs
; NCt'TICE OF ��ING
i
,
t
Qctober 17, 1994
1
I
TO �80M IT MAY GONCERN:
NOT'ICS is hereby given that the Planning Commissian o
Heights. wz].1 meet at ?:45 o'clock P.M.� or as soon as
thereaf�er, on Tuesday, Oc�ober 25, 1994, in the City Hal.
Chambers, 1101 Vic�oria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minne
conside'r an application from Mendota Heights Un.ited. C
Christ 'for sign size variance which would allow the
temporary, free standing signs ta advertise speciaZ eveni
following described property:
Section 25, Twn 28, Range 23, W 390 ft of E 599.5 tt
of',: SW 1./4 Ex S 56Z.5 �t
More particularly, th3s property is located at 68a
110.
�
This notice is pursuant to City af Mendota Heights t
No. 401; Such persons as desire to be heard with referenc
`proposed Varia.n.ce will be heard at this meeting.
;
;
� Rathleen M. Swanson
' City C2erk ..
�
t
�
Auaciliary aids for disabled persoas are available upo�
at,least 12Q houra ia advauce, If a notice of less
� hours ia received, the City of Meadota 8eighta wil]. mE
atte.mp� to provide the aids, hawever, this may uot be
an ,short notice. Please caatact City Aclmiuistra�3.oi
� i850 with requests.
, a
T
f
` Mendota
passible
. Council.
�ota, to
zurch of
use oE
s on the
f NE 1/4
Highway
to the
request�
»haa 12 0
!ce every
at �52-
FOUNDER
OLIVIA IRVINE DOD(iE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FRANK 8. TIFFANY
PRESIDENT
INORID CONANT
ALMA DERAUF
KIMBERLY DODOE
OL'IVIA I. DOOC;E
THOMAS DODQE
ELIZABETH S. ORISCOLL
CLOVER EARL
OLIVIA C. FOHD
WILLIAM HUEG
HORACE H. IRVINE, 111
CATHERINE NICHOLSON
TIMOTHY M. OBER
HOWARD OLSpN
DANIEL PENN�E
OEORaE C. POWER, JR.
dINNtE RECORD
ROBERT RICK
VICENTA �. SCARLETT
HUGH SCHILLINCi
STEVEN TOUREK
WILl1AM WEST
OREOORY J. lEE
EXECUTIVE OIRECTOR
�c� i��- � � 9 �
Zlto�as ,7rv«e �od�e �a�ure G'e�r�er
1795 CHARLTON STREET
WEST SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55118-3800
16121 455-4531
FAX 16121 455-2575
14 October 1994
Thomas Lawell .
City Administrator
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear TOm
The Dodge Nature Centex has received a request from the Mendota Heights
United Church of Christ to support their request to the City of Mendota Heights
for a change in their sign adjacent to Highway 110 (see enclosed copy of
information provided to the Nature Center). I am writing on behalf of the Dodge
Naturn Cen#er to inform you that the Nature Center has no objection to the
proposed change in the church's sign. What the church is requesting appears to
be extremety benign, and if helpful to the church, should be approved in the
interests of the church and the Mendota Heights residents which it "serves.
Sincerely,
��_�r ► -�o-7 �
Grego�r�,�� Lee/
Executive L�irector
�_�
C� Reverend Robert Henderson
Frank Tiffany .
� Recycled Paper
� � . �� � . I r ^� /T-. I 11 _ � ' .
yfl: f��-�' '�':� �1�f� . 1
�i � �.�►�i I.
�y��{ h / �\ 1 t:
Y ♦ y �a � ' ��
. 1�r . � ` �� . 4� `i� •,t .,�i �A�.r1Q � � y�i�
(��, � ` , f' A��� �7 ��7 ' T r , I
� ^ � r �+.���e. �'' i i � , '�� .�(
�, � '�`% ,��, .�, ,..�!�_��.':tir�'�{ j�.}r! i: •�l���+ 9�',' " �F � . ,!
,�+L����., � L�VI _ . ib� ~_.� ,a-..
t�� ���,�` DOT��.N�IGHTS . , �_
�i,r`.., .r� MEN � ��'–` _ ,•s
� �r�������� UNITED f - ... :=��_
;.�,� � �;�!'�:..; . ' �._ .
�_ �f�,����u}..��R�` CNURCH OF CHRIST ��:.::s:. � �°�fi:;
;i� :�;;,��,z- y ,��. ,..
�,._ .:
. � . ,4 �. K�. ` . � �
,�:s:��� . �.:.:,;;,� ._ _ CONGREGATIUNAL � .hT �, ''t'�`'�;�;•=�
�-�. � 10 A •, �. �j � �>=t�'
M� � . �::��,} ��;;;��;.�� ,
�r': �, _ . .,, .,.. .._ �• . . i�..,r :; ;�w•y?�;���'^r'�'a ,�;:i
V .1 � � �, 'x� �
� � �,1'� . . °'. t'Fr'_.%r. • � yflf�T � 7 .' S`A ,�!rtL .' � ,� s j ��� w �•, � '�a �t
J^ ��! .. .y,. �Q,6'' . I� , � y) "14T� J .�` Y;�
� va' • r.�' ��' '�. QC •.�.,,,�i..a...,*.,a?�.;. �..91.��r Zf•�y'�,.J
,f�.� , ` •��L ��9�.. . v".f �i\
i;. .;� � �� b ��' .•''�1r�J`'" � '� .�. ��
�' �ur i `� c.. . . �
� 'a� f����"'f ` ���i,�� �� ' �a 4�� i �. � •K.� � • , � K i• •.:
� �� ~ .�M ��a�+J � � � 'L' {',• . P� S�:l
.L` . �� *�T ..h' `.' '.� j. � ,
. �.. ::�� . , i ,1.:
..� . � ' Si`: i� y
.. ' �l✓�..�,�>y+�. ..t' � : ' .. . . .
//+, ' . . • ; . ., ^
Ti/;___yR� y�.. ��R'l .:. .� �4 '.� �Y 'J..�,:/xC�" .��. i ,,.... ... ...._..�,.teif
}��
„ Sx .� ��
.� �,
� �i6:01A HEIGNIS
' � U' fil0
�, `= -��+ CII'"fHOfCNR151 �;,
,,� � �...,�,
� ;n %�i
r � ,
. �,
;> y ; , y
. + :.- � .
� � a "�.a.�'r <"
t, �
Y�•. . `)..� .r �. ��V'
' 1'r ='. ���" �y �'�4��e1'.�
� •,f : �/.'1 .'� � Yt.y''{',
� .:/r'.b��^.wrv.
i
�e:: � ,, �,�r •
;,. i,, T �,� ',
, � '��aCn ��'��, .�.
,. � _ _ <7' - .
�j•f••{�• •, �• • • �
ii.('`'� �
.�.r'��Y, ''�;.r•.,.�
��v.'F''�'� /:• '�..
.,`�.': ,..tiiw :, f i
ii: � �'C,.�: '.y ,
�;����.. "Y•
��, . J'�.�� ;... . i
♦
. y^�. ' • ��7 �
. . 'S,�:C� ' ,
, �.
�,tµ � � ��� . -
�� • .
: ' '•''. � :'� • 'j , � `�
�- �.��--,.�-- .�� �-
. ti ` -t�>> �� "•
'S;�'id��� j !' ' *� l� - �;'
'� r'1 "� 1 �' i E
a r
�� `.�.'�' ~ ,�� ;yj ,. �o''a�: �ZV
i�r � 1-` a�, • �' � : � � �
.�,• „� 'G� r,�',f• '. �!�:s ��;
• �+. ,� . �
. '�,� C:; .
��: : , , r. y �' ' ky ' : <�; • �� • y . € t
I1 r�', . . ..' , � � • `,, .v�:.
•"R i� ,�• � � ',����
. � � : �',.` � . . �ro ".r, .. . : . ' f � � - �S � � # . _
�J�•��I � �• � X�1��`�n �•'^ _ •..•w..:.��. ..�..: .� �-...._...,.. �.
■��.. �. ' ^,..A,,. ��z s�.�, {'�' , _.M3u r �,,,,�,�,��.� ..... ....__
w ., .� • . ' ~ � � h r T'._'� _ ._ ' .'t . —
, ..,-
. �,�.:::.r •.- .. , .
:-
t.
t=c;cTrr��s
L�q 1�I — S t �-!�l . .
��N r�o�'� f-�TS. �nl�:r�c�
cc� u1�c�{ O� CHR�s�T
Co/t� CrI��C�F��'t Dnt � L
� . tY' ' ` ! � i ' �J
Z � i � � ... . ... : _ S��.sr�:�:�_',/ � j � � I
Pr,,, a j.'�'-,,� ,� . �.'.� ` 1
M
_ r �t � � � � � : . ��„�.! 3 ;1 � � ; t 1 f, r,�z �'
.. �� � • , { I'
' I
�.. �� � .. i ` �t
�,, � � ` l
� � ► ti
�
. � s k
� �
; � !
� �,
. , } i
a
} — — — — — -— — r — — — — — — — — — � , . •
_ ��� � �� ��� � � ��t
— � — _ �� � { .�
_�� _.. _ �� _ � �1� ��.�._.. � .. � •
�..
.. �. ,, . . _.
�
, ,� .� �
. . i , . , . ;._..._.
w ' .
' ' i .......�.,.�....�.�.«.�....�....�...+ • �
. � ,
. . .-i -.«.��.t _.. .... . «.,F,� �
� ' � . t ' .......�.,..�.».�.... ... ....� .��...... � • \
� � � • � . f
� .w. ' .. �...� .�.,. �.-�..�. ..�... . ._ �
�' �' }
C7 U I ){7'� � • . � . _ ... . .. � • , " .
.- r ,., . ;
���77�1(.! '���r�� .�%-^""''`r^ . ^ ._. __ ' J . .
�� � � �
• �_ . ... _._... .. ..._....,.._._ l$ - .
. _.,_
. �
. . .� 1 /~ � v�
. .
• � .
. �, �
�
� 'r I �1i'ry p} �"d � W
� �t���1,�' i � •t:
,t��,,t�- . ' i ,�
,
� �l' } � - _
'T �t`t�'O1.�.7��.�'�I.�JAl0�3 •,
�..S��t�� :�� �la�n �� �
G1.�...t�IlV�1 `.�l.N �:.�.c�c� N,��'r�1
-� 1 � — l�l.
. . . . �!
. . �i'L� t�'� l/ i � �s.J
t
2' ,
��1� � t't� � �"v � �, �S�` � �, S,� h :
� �
1��N�7'�` }��iG � rS �L.C.�
9
I �
�October�20,
1994
C ity o�
1Viendota Hei�hts
�Ms. Jeanne Lufkin
�Mendota�Heighta United Church of Christ
680 Highwa.y 110
Mendota iHeights, NIl�T 55118
Dear Ms: Lufkin:
� .
Your application for a Yaria.ace will be considered by the
�, Com�ni.saion at their next regularly scheduled meeting, whicY
'held on �'uesday, October 2�, 1994. The Planning Commiesion
'starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here are City Hall in the
Chambers. You, or a repreaentative should plan on atten�
meeting,! in order that your application will receive Co�
consideration.
i
If you Yiave any questions, please feel free to contact me
+
'Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
Enclosures
will be
meeting
Council
iing the
nmi.esion
�
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights,lViN • 55118 452 • 1850
i �
1 �
� � Ci1
i ...... � 1Viendota Hei;
�
►
!October�28, 1994
i
�
�Ms. Jeanne Lufkin
IMendota�Heights United Church of Christ
�680 Highway 110
Mendota �Heights, NIlJ 55118
Dear Ms: Lufkin:
Your application for a variance will be considered by
,
Council`at their_next regularly scheduled meeting, which
i
held on�Tuesday, November 1, 1994. The Council meeting s
, �
7:30 o'cTock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chamber
' !
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting
�
that your application will receive Council consideration
,
If you have any c�uestions, please feel free to contact me
F
Sincerely,
� •
��s� �X� �J � :
Revin Batchelder �
Administrative Assistant
�
RLB:kkb!
Tnclosures
f
y o�
he City
will be
arts at
� . You,
n order
1101 Victoria Curve • 1V�endota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
1� ,
. / '
� � ��' ` O � Q �+-�ti.� �7
,�,��� � `�� �-
� ,��, r"' --� �s
� �~�� �'`�" • -` � , ..
\�.`1 0
� Q ��'`` Q � d .��.;,_� � �
_ o � --� � ,� .
_ � � � �=�� -pE. .�.---- � �. a
'�' '.•-....,,,, s M �,� '# -
� --=--��.-----r.-- - �- �: •
:s,,..,;,,,,,.,..,.-- ' _ ; -
• - _.,,--
._. _ _ _ _____..______._ _ .�
--� -�. .., ��-=� -� �. _
0
- - �. , �
�.4 G �'� I C��! � �
a�` ���?�C�SEi"�i . �
� S ��i s� �.�.
- � �
--.--, - �-� � __ _ .. . �..i_
� �
�
S 1?'� ��'L��1 � �:
.�
-------,-�''ror F'�.Ot"''a5 S .__:_. � � �� �
��� i�N� .
.:
. - • � r
, /�1ENao�t� H�.1�1�T5 �
- -- �.
c���-r�.� cHuRc��_�_ c»��sr . --
�
� i0a 2a6 3po �
'•.
.,
_��� -..�
�
.�
� "'r`. N . i �' � ,l
4 � .�..�'�^--�— �" --': :.
-� �----» � � RST�oc�ND L.�c� �
� :�.,�._..�..�.. -
� ___--.��`t��
�-�.a°b► . . � �;:
�%j1,����� ;r �_ _ —
, ,
. _�" r ',
cKuRGl�
�
�
�
,�
{
r�/' . .. _.�_.__ J!: _...�� _�
� AsSun�Ct� � — - -
� . ��op��� . x.
-ti. � . i �, i �`��� � ...--.
ti
' To
� From:
Subject:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�� �
October 27�, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative
Planning Case No. 94-32: Subdivision/Lot Line Adjustment
DISCUSSION
�
Mr. Keith Heaver, developer, appeared before the Planning Commission a
October meeting to request adjustments to the lot lines for three lots in the North l
Second Addition (Sutcliffe Circle). Mr. Heaver desires to make these changes to :
Lot 3 with more rear yard and view orieutation. Each side lot line is proposed to
adjusted ten feet (10') to the west and all lots will continue to meet the minimum
requirements of both the subdivision and zoning ordinance. (Please see attached F
Report and Application.)
i
The Planning Commission expressed a concern that Lot 1(the corner lot at
Circle and Highway 13) would become pinched and that variances might be neces;
future development. The Planning Commission requested that Mr. Heaver provid
plans that better detail the new easements required for any adjusted lot lines and tb
describe the old easements that will need to be vacated.
Mr. Heaver will also have to apply for a vacation of the old easements at a
City Council meeting.
;
RECOMMENDATION
�
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to waive the requirement for a public
Mr. Heaver had submitted all the signatures of consent from surroundi.ng neighbo�
Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that City Council approve the requ
Subdivision for lot line adjustments, as proposed with the condition that the prope�
be provided for the new lot lines.
�
�
ACTION REQUIRED
!
Meet with the applicant. If the City Council desires to unplement the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, they should pass a motion to appro�
Resolution No. 94-_, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION TO AI
PROPERTY LINES IN NORTH IVY HII.LS, 5ECOND ADDITION.
its
ry Hills,
Sutcliffe
ary for
; revised
�t better
as
The
easements
� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINIVESOTA
j i RESOLUTION NO. 94-
i �
� A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION TO ADN5T PROPERT!
, � NORTH IVY HII.LS, SECOND ADDITION
j
� WHFREAS, Mr. Keith Heaver, owner of Lots 1 and 2, of North Ivy Hil
� Addition, and Mr. Jay Salmen, owner of Lot 3, North Ivy Hills, have requested f.
' City to adjust property lines for Lots 1, 2, and 3, North Ivy Hills, Second Additic
subdivision, said subdivision as proposed on Site Plan Survey printed on October
file in Plauning Case File No. 94-32; and
� I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said subdivision at their
25, 1994 meeting; and
�
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that City
approve said Subdivision for lot line adjustments, as proposed with the condition i
, proper easements be provided for the new lot lines; and
�
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed said subdivision at their Novembe
meeting and finds the same to be in order.
i
NOW THF1tEFORE , IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Counci
City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the subdivision, as proposed on Site Plai
dated October 4, 1994, be and the same is hereby approved with the following co�
LINES IN
, Second
�m the
by
. 1994 on
the
1, 1994
of the
Survey
That the proper easements be provided for the new lot lines and recorded ati the
County with the subdivision. I
�
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of N�
1994. ;
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA
Bv
Charles E. Mertensotto,
ATI�ST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
, ;
' ' t
t
� �
' C ity o�
' .�. �i.� 1Viendota Heights
�
� ;
� October 28, 1994
I � •
i � •
�
; Mr. Keith Heaver
Heaver�Design
! 875 Mendakota Court
` Mendota Heights, NIl� 55120
1
Dear NIr. Heaver:
Your application for a Subdivision will be considered by the City
�
Council� at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
;
held on,Tuesday, November 1, 1994. The Council meeting Itarts at
;
7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You,
�
or a representative should plan on attending the meeting in order
i
that your application will receive Council consideration .
�
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
. �
; Sincerely,
� �`�� � ��
� �
�
Revin Batchelder
Administrative Assiatant
�
�
' KLB : kkb
Enclosures
;
1 4
I
I �
I �
I �
i j
, ;
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
� PLANNIl�TG REPORT
�
� DATE: �
l
�
CASE NO: `
i i
,APPLICA�'T:
f
LOCATI4N:
� �-
ACTION R.� QUESTED;
PREP.A.RED BY:
� .
�
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
1
, Background
��c:q�:l�� f ieAT�:�)
COiVSili,TitVG PLANNERS
LANDSCAI'L• ARCHITECTS
30{? FIKST AVENUE IdURTI-i
Si3tTE 21{i
MINNEAPC7Llti, MN �Salll
6l2 •339 •3.30(1
October 25, i994
94-32
Heaver Design aad Canstructian
Lats 1, 2, and 3 SatcliffCircle
North Ivy H"ills, Second Edition
Subdivision/L�ot Line Adjustment
C. 7ohn Uban
; Mr. Jay Salmeai is the owner of Lot 3 af the pmposed Iot line adjustrnents by Heaver Constnicti�
two lots, Lots 1 and 2, are owned by Heaver Constructian. The cl�anges in lot lines are to
adjustrnenis in�e ut�ities tbat sesve Lots 3 aad 2 aad be�ilding orieutatian wbic,h. will allow more �
orientation for Lot 3. A11 of the new propased lat dimensions and lot siz�es meet the criteri
, Subdivision attd Zoning Ordinance.
�
Since this s��bdivision has gon� �gh all the review and construciion far a normai subdivisian th+
of all th'e subdivision. info�ati� is not n�essary. The enclased plan shaws the proposed adjus6m
lines which are appmuimately tea foot changes to the west for each Iot No#ice has been mai2ed to
and a hearing will be required. Thrce of the adjacent neighbors did not sign the public heair%ng w
Subdiwision�Review �
� `
The praposed adjustx�aents� are to the benefit of Lot 3, which will allow urilities and a transfarmet
: tb be more advantageausly located an tt�e property. Lat 3 will also benefit fram additional land adc
� yard where the primaiy views far the home arientafion are located Lots 1 and 2 are owned by the i
� no other lots,will be affected hy the progosed subdivision change.
� All drainage easemeuts witl be recorded aiang with the Io# iine adjushnents and no actual utiIities v�
` relocated All of the lots will be over 18,000 square f�et in size.
1
Action �
E �
� Hold pablic hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. �
The other
ur yard view
of the City
re-submi#taI
nts to the lot
xe neighbars
particular,
ta tlze rear
eloper and
have to be
/� __ -'��=�1
���� ; , -"' " -
. ' ---- -
� �l. t---
� � I � ��' +( � '% '' �i
� �> ; ; �� • ^,
', '� ,y`
; ` I ; , 'Yi \ � /
i�
'' j �; y� �4` �; � � ` .
:^{ �� � �' '.�
� � f;' ' .
� � / `\ �Y � � , � � �
I N `� <, � 1 �� � �
�� � � � I •, '��' �
�A �` �, ��`; .
JL .�-►`�1��,] 1 /� i .� i
'7���________ •` �. < � � '
I/ . ' Y .l � �i�' i
� �Errrrrrrsry � , � ; � j � �
.������ � �J I/� 1 / i � ���T
, ; „ ., --
` .�.-- � : � • . ��_
N / V� 7
��(/ � � , I , � " �
s� �.•� � % yy ----- :
� � �� N v�' ♦ ,
i ... s» __ . .S' . ^rc t!
� v _
� " _J� _
' ',dT � ' _ J���� _
=y�� T,� ,' ' 1
'\� 7 `— � �` � �
\ }�� . �i j �� �
/.�� — : .�G = _ =-
T \ ,� I T --
� � . �- -_
i i� , - " -_ '• - _
� d• [ � .
♦ I .� ' S/ Y. i.
�:�_ _r�.= � ;::
�_ . _ L: _._ ; '.�.�:...Jr:
� ' � •
��'-- •':'.:':� � . � %�
_ . » :�. . .^ � •.1^`T�: (`
� L � I
� �1 � �� � • • • � �� � � . �
� ` � T"'�� —
:'� 4 . ,.,. .. .. .
. � � �E _
• A •• •�• �• • l� i . ..
' . ' � SUBJECT PROPERTY
� �.� NORTH T
SCALE y"=800'
. i ' _ :
� � � �.� �• • ��_•��)f'
• • � � • �-1---11�' '
_ �. . ._
r////i�'Ar�'��0����VIY� ��-����.•.�����wll�0��
�� , �-i�' I o�o- " ._.� : �af �eo�~4��=as01� '�' �
� � � • d�4� �rri,�.�i�O�Q�::^-:r; �►� �,�
� �-._ �,�'� W p - a � " �-oo��.ava�4 ��i�O•,e n�
--;.•�� yf.�` � �"e�`!pQ'd��ifiA��;,ll�
� a� �' y � � s�a i i,a.
�� ��,,�� - e�::�� a^ =a.;o�� aQ ;�►�-■ ��a
. 0�:..� .� . ,�� o� o� �..�
.� �;;,�.•� se ,.o a� . ���. ov .... y;�
,���,, ��p . o o�� �, e o::� ��
�,, .�;����. a fo ^, -.� �� � ,, �r� m =
. .,' �
`/, ��j`,��� L'� ,� w a
,%�"t '� /y � o �
�°�'i �. �r- � a,� � -.� ��:
b
r-' ��'�%:,�- a�dee�� ��.��� ~� ea=� ��
� ���': R�i��•J,�.�!'• � ;►.�:13T:i•:.ii: � �� �ii
� �'�� . ' � -'• •�I�R?
� . ��i 1► 0�l�01 ��I,�i �oodo l,, e� � ��
,� � �►i'�.�..�. ._, ssee� ... � �o ��.
� � v 1'i�Y_��bl.\7�:14 . O � -� � � '
, � � . � �/ v 1•O ��!i.. O� � �
�! . :..: de �o � e� � ��
�'�► � � � � �o aee=e �1�
.��' , �� ♦ :� �0�� o,� 0; �000 _
;� � � ss� _ �����ae��o�o ��oo�eo �
;� ';� d p� �� ;�.:�:»�,.TT o � e: p. o��
� ;,� � o � �e oo� �� _,�
�5;::����►�� � ���; �� ���i�� �. �_v � ��
e�• s �_ o�, _ �s :.v _ �
�oYoo.��A�� Q�v,��: -- �!�.s����o�;��
���.e �� ��.�o��. aa� ... ...._: �o ��d
.�'� �i�.;.�... ......,. � �-- �•., .�►- �r�
' � ��aO��OO �! � �11
p��Or�Oo�=�� t� �_-- � � �1
��ev oss v� �� �� �� -� . � .
a� Sa��r.�o d ����---� _ - �
� �� : ��`�' I1r[,� fi \7i•'�� �'�d� _ /'
; po�4�0�'9o�ioo':��:�sc ,
Q. a� �s�0.�o,
`:.0 0 ��i000=�1 yl�a� ._
�Tv� � � �"4�0 �4 � o��o � _
��a o0���0 �a,�� s 0000 !!� .
� �..,..� r:,� Sl7s�1�
ad0�,o,�� e f :�� ���o .
'� � ii�o�iiOP� �'Q, ���n ��i�o �^
'_ , � - 000�00�� s.o io
;_, �e � _,.
.� ��
�,:= y.:a. s•�►.�.��v � . �I� �� �
� ' 0�00���.�1 �;�.�: y�:tu • � • • `r
� i' T * �� ,� �
� _ n����
� /� ' � m A
� ••�s:��•c.�.ic ��•�--�._a•�a:m
p 1�� � �-� :� o r
�' o � �
. �o. o��s . •
� '
/ • / � ' o� ``=�B �-� v � M � �
,1 �. � I � lGZ29
� � i �� • � ��,�, G� t`:
6 � • 0 � 6 �� /� �
���0``� o�Z � o� .L
� .}• � � � Lof -¢ ��
L � .�,s 3 a� Ac �
� ' �a � d ry � ,yb QQ ,
� _ Lo� S GQ` M
V :�.
� Ti►�i �v Ci r Y Beicie - -
, �.jG ' p �c . co
co. �
� � k � Z�, � � z.
/' I��t1, �y j 8G qc. S° •�P� a.� � �
zo4 � lt� F
1 � :I , i/ t � < , :
I � pJ�q �� , I �e ,� '9,y
' I �
S ' (p i ' I
f� � � I �
,• � s
! -. T � � �-
�• a g ,
+ ` . . •
� � -f713 Y. T. L T , s' + •�. `
; 1 . � . � N ,,� :� � -
�o� •• - z b � `� � �' , � � �� �
� -- .• 1t, G i1 � �y'' = i � Q� 3'
T w �. v C i�' Y B. e i c K G�' o. r�r . Q � P ,• ',G. . :� . q. 1�,�,!� �, z r
� . s c z rsa.�s
• I � 9� �'- ' EVG¢•NtA .I.. � � • dT: �
� �SUBJECT PROPERTY .'� � ��� �:.:,;.:. • .;, t.Y;�:_��; i: �. ,�x�.�,
, , o� �` �,. :... �-. t + ��`�j �� . A ti , x ; �:� n�+ ti►
, � � :.,�.,�,�,,�.�,'r,�}� '.;`.;�" • ��:v:e_'�.i'', �. •�.� � k r.acst s • .
+ 'iJ�: . 77: . • l0 � _ , � .
. � NORTH �• L•: '''::�:: t::::::�:��;: ��rt 4 � ���_ -
' SCALE �1"=200'l� �c • •• :.'. . :• . `.". T "
, ;x;:::c;v,�:i•: '�';'i�, �::iti'� � �
; I" ; ''�:'• �' :, � .7i ci i?r c
� �• zy
, �'f ' y' r•-.s••, ,. `(rl'x;;��q`.
• '� ••• `M �.M1 I�F
' � �.t ::�.._ i••� co• �r.�..s.•:.` �::.
' , . .rR;
! 0"' • • P • ,:�.; +��...:• ,.� • . .:, [��'?'4 y F
' � . `!� � ' ' ����RYf . � . '../'F�i ... . , CiThbf .. �� • ti „y� N
..! _ �! :
�� a� B�e�cE : ..� ' , � . + •'��:-• �� , 's � �s �+ ,s
• -„�Ljo ��. sr • rtv� • I .. �
• �U~ { � � ) ' • •
� J.. : • • ..
P, .,,,,, „r., / e � 0 ' . �. ��ri; .. ��:�; _•� - . �
� � � � .. :h �!� . � � �-.T.!. e.:rw '. . ..j _ •���" . ... ..s'Y.. ;N'�� � o is
:. � • ..
� j'!`- i�e,9/ ts �s eo .�...5 zo� zs • ./i �oG �a r �c
ti '�' '����' ��A° '�' �° .• 4 y '�` • � .�,'''
ti �c� 's�i� � ��c, �.�� ``o �lo �'►� o ° � •.+� � � 3 `xw � � o �
�'�,� �i-o,' 0 3 g 4 �p ' y tj�� � .4 y N.8 ` y« G
?��, �`0 1 ' .. 16 —o� � cRs �'be' 2 � !� w s . tv�:
, 7C2 ' �� { �f" ,q� -sr, •'L •ry �v .i !Z,
C I 7� �� • R�p• v < <
t � f 4
�� � � . �•� c. � �0 ` d�or hs '�t � ��� / R� Z�� f �` '� � Q, K eo�
� � t ^ � � ; 1 G Sy ,� Ls �N , �.- � � 1� : - W � s �
A � � I 'ti` � � 4 y ,�,� �NS w�' _ e�;•� I
� � � ,� �. >—� `I'� �s+.» u 3e � • s� do
n �`y� �� kp .l � . s 3 . i 5 �4 ,.s.� S . ,�� ir� `% •. � 4k*ti � '
�?c�►�'4�a, , . � v � �o � ; � _ ..` � � � S o"� ` � � L A�s � a v o
�1r� oiM e S j �? '_- � �h � � � `i � ! . � ss �' � 4 K ,, q � �,
L �, � � O � tD IZ'S 4 � �j�� W N / q l� l�
, ' y�' ' � ,� -L 2 iz* s' - \ • 2 � ,' '� ;'�
0 `
± •R '�' � ,��. 0 � � � e i e I +ties a1 � to a4
i S �1 • t�' 9 � 4 !,� ... ,.r ` ..r: .,.5 �o
��� j � f �' '. p � �'� � I . N 9a
�
' �' 'o�''r� � � �_Z. s :
>� a� � ' -� v Z4 P' a 5 y .�S , .'' y r
• �N r � c� �o� 9 t g I ` 3
�5 �'9-���,�„���� i�t � � $y� 3 �� - s .� �o . _ �
� to • „ �
.
o � o �-,� � • � .s9'. 3s� s * '3 ,,. • P,�/ � • ' � „ �t'
N �/ 0 2 s ,�r ;
: � � `��' � •� ! � ,, �xs "'� � �i
� /BS; { /,S `h /S9 � GO /32 /GZ.7G � '� t�s A N w /i�
� ��e .�.�di .A+. .�, �i5.42 —_ Me O�NALA tT. - :L�� � 4 I _ ...
4 . �
1 � �
� �
i �
� �
k" !
I , 3
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, INC.
�
�
I �
;
�
4
�October ,4, 1994
� ,
� �
�City of -Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
}
1
1
RE: Slock 1, Lots 1, 2, & 3
Nor�th Ivy Hills 2nd Addition
Dear Planning Commission Members, Council Members and Mayc
1
This letter will serve as written request for City approv�
redescribe the above referenced property and easement line
proposed�changes would improve orientation of the lots anc
improvements allvwing homes to be more appropriately posil
for optimal views. The proposed changes would greatly bet
all three homeowner's of said lots and should not have an3
on adjacent property.
, �
I have attached a plat showing the proposed changes and aF
preciate�your consideration in this request.
Sincerely, ..
Keith W.�Heaver
President
, ;
1
� i
f
�
� `
� -
. j
�
;
,
i
r
�
We design to your needs Build to perfection.
j 875 Mendakota Court, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120, (612) 687-0882
�
i
r:
1 to
s. The
ioned
efit
effect
♦l.i�►1♦
� ity a�
1��ie�,data Heights
- APFLICATI4N FQR CQNSIDERATI4N
OF
PLANNIlr1G REQUEST
Applicant Name.
Case No. ��7' �� 1
Date of Apptication O—`���
_ � - s�} � 7� ��-.
Fee Paid � • Tt?Q,1'���
.
0
t�i ��) �)
Address: �• Wll�l 2.c�
(Number & St,reet) f CitY) <5tate) C�P)
__--
owner rtame: . ..� �..r �'a1 me�►n
(L.asc) {First) (MI)
Address: _� �C� �c.�---� � i � �. T�-t �= �i��1o� ��-�..,,�V)''L�
(Number & Stireet) (City) (State) (Zip)
Street Lacation of Praperty in Questian:
. ����_�.��..� �� �.r�..� �
Legal i7escription of Property: j-. o'"t'S � l, o� -t- "� �,t C�C %
T�rpe of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Pemait
Cc�nditianal Use Pemnit for P.0 I�.
Plan Approval �
Compreh�nsivc Plan Amendment
Vaziance
,,.,�_ Subdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanatioa)
Applicable �ity t�rdinance Number 3Q 1 Section
Presen�zo�gof�PmperE� 'l� i PresentUse �c'��� .- '���T
�
Proposed Zoning of ProPertY �,� Pt�oPosed Use �t. �� c��, `�.
I hereby der,Iare ihat ali s'tatements mad� in this request n the additianal
materi� are fcue. , � � ,",,
' - ' �v �..
{ of Appiir,�i) .
���
�������
�.C.�
11U1 Victaria Curve •N�endota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452•
�"�end.o�a
�a�f�Y�i(f `j
�x�+y a�
T • Iw I .
� _ _ __
� f3IG2�ATLlR�Es OF CGINSEN'1` lY?R V,AR�N� R.�OUES'J.'
i .
2t�: T�ie P1�nnY?ig Commission, Ci�y o� Mendota BeigIats
�
FROM: ProperEy t"�wnexs of '" ��'s 1 2 � (a c
� � 1 V �r � �v v �'c i � 5 '� " ��C;���'Cd i-,
� � u '�'C � t C �C �� rrc.C.Q ,
�
W
' � . ' .
RE: �,..o�" �iWt. c7�.c� �uS'�`�.�. �S
, � .
� � � t Ce.�. �" C p V'� � v" �T' _„S��s � t '�`
!
, •
1• .
s . • , .
, � • � ,� -
i�Ie �ze undersigne8. have reviewe8 the : p2ai�s for S:.b�r u tSfan
' � • : .ana ••vndeZ'st.ana the #�..zms. ana � .
coa �.ons af fihe rec,�ues�ed� vm�.��- 1of t c w4. �4. �5,� u s f-w�
� _ . .., ` 1
We have no' ob ecttons • i:o �h�.s xeque�t , and do hereby ve awc
wri��n consea� and cottsen� ,�o' �taives o� pub3.ic �ite.ar3r.ug.
; • . - -
Sixtc�re2y� i � � .
ri� �Please 1?rrit�t} srGz��TURE AnnREss � i
i ' 1
.e �
...,aw�wvt �-j�atncy� r"aSG � ��i �u�
a i� q- ��.._.f �.w. ' tah ' � • 'S 7!0 : `..�cal
� N�2 � �"� � LuQ�f'�rjV1 ' • � �j �
—r ,_.�.,_. . , �_.._�.�
��� S � ��
�.+n�c.5s�'(r ��-'�i"(Gtc. E? ' �. " [ S �'C"ft
.��lcaG� l � Ldf' �� � ..�NU'�'r�
�`t�-�t'^' � � c}'�.1 l g-• �ouS � (,s, {3 ( � •
• -�� Sa � w�..Q.' c..� (rst'�� �j�
"� �
�y4 ; . �� SU �
� t� b� ��y '� li'"'-c�2.rc Q� ��2 s' t C L-� �i'J�G� y 'J�� 7
� 1 {
t� " '.� q� 1 �a�r�e �'lsc.v� (00{� S�toG
�-- ; -
�yt� �6 ��oora.{� i�{nt�s4v�'L ' " �I � �t�
T'_..___""_ �'_ .
� ! z � .
� � � �
,'�`r �r �C�
�f���,�e .
t� �'�'e. ,
r YY�i^'�o c`t c�. � T� y
f
��������
+�i.�� o�
�,,� �,� ,� � 1��.endo�a �+�i��.��
.�.._, �.
. �IGNA'L't7RE5 t�F Ct31YSEI� I�`8R VA'R2�NCE; �OUES�' �
TO: The Plaxuvi.ng Cammissian, Ci�y ct Mendata Seigh�s
�R�M: Proper�y Owners of "��S i � 3 ( c� c�. �
_l�lr�r �L�. �v �t %�t � � 5 � „" r'�4'�.`tc�h "
.
�j U�"C f t�' �C? �t r-G C,.�p '
i2E: ' �..G��' � � w2 a,.� �uS'�i�we.� �"S .
f ' _ '
� L CC� �" C
.�
We the vndersi.gaed have rev%�red the;plai�s for s�.b��u�Sio,a C.c�f' �(c�f
' : ,artd •-vnders�d �he '�e:�; and � . }���_
COx'ld1'�.OIiS C� '�h�P �'eC,�LiE�:S'rEd` V"��� jd"F �t �,R c�.� �� S��'!�
i . • ' .�.�� � .
. . . •
L4'e ita.ve sto' o�ij e+�ions� �.a ttu.s xec,�nes� , aaa ao ne;
wri��n c:�usent and couseat ,�o` �taiver o� Public
Sirtc�lY.
NB�E {Please Pr32i�}
' �w-c..,.ori a-�ja�c� �rox.
°'�'S�-C.� �+ t4- � u�l.. '�a. w. P t c, h
, ----�--:- .
' vt t e �- (vl �r � � ��tQst.�"'Sdtn
���,�'- ��`-�'r'tcto. �-�.�te.S
���%� i + t,.af €,� i�
t�2�-�vt'' � 2 �;�t �t" C'c�u S ,
'� .�� S ct t tn.�.p. r-,
.,....�.
�� a y�1Q `�" t�i�rc r�� �i� a- t c tr,
�a..�"ry q- l}Q �rE e�t Sc.v S
T
�%1,��(G�- '� .��oarci.� ��''►wc�tv�'L
T t
�
_ _ r '�
• l.
�� y t0..� �
i �Wr • '
.
ann�ss ��rt'cL. r�oae� .
�6�; 5yf�t���"c
�7�. Sc��-�t��'e
� � C,,�, � � Ez i� ��e • .
� [�OG�s 1�'�-t�.r c'�-�, �
µ• tr e,� C��+-ovt � .y'�d7?
�� � �2,� �Y r rC>
���' S�.,������'�' .
�� �7 S�, -� i � ��'e..
�O(3{c � c Za�.Y yt�i,¢wco r�� � �
� 7 i Ef cr�.c.,-►a �{,•� -
�
�IAd 'i�''S...L�...!�. i'��..�...,.��. ii�..�.f.�1.w if.���G''�4��a �X�T � .CL"�•f�A /�I+�+'�u+n►�
0
!
i
'
i I
� } .
i
I
�
�<<4�� ��
� ��
���1�C�O�c�, �+�1
� SIGI�'ATQRES flF' +CUNSEN�.` FQR VARIANC� �RS�UES'i
2'0: The Plarming commissian, C�.�y of Mendota Seights
FROM: Pxape:rty Owners o� ' � fs � ..t 2 .-;. 3' ,� � {ti c �- �
c7r � �v v �c �
'�'C � c � 1rG �c
�if�"�([`j
�
� �� �. ��,;���'ta i-, � .
. . �
�C+351 �rwi-K I 3 . .
� � s . - � .
i�r �" .n�i'�
. �
.. . I
� � . . .� .
Re �he v.udersigned have reviewe� �.he:plans for SLb�.culsion
��
' i � . : .ana ••understat�a �he f�e�,�ns: ana � . �
CO22d1'C.t021S G� '�18 �t,�E'.S"t�.'� �TB��� �a"� � t yti2 c�.� w 5 1
� s ' `
�..�..� 'Q} ,
We b,ave no' ob ec�zans• �.o �s a�:�qa,es� ,atid do hereby ve o�
wr3�.�t�n consea� and conseati ,i;o" tisaf.ver c� puhlic hearing.
i •
Sauicel�3.y�' � � . .
# . ..
rt�E �Please ,nrint3 s=GxA2�iRE ADDREss { �
�w�Gvovt a- �atrt c � q'�'S� ' �� �v�
i �`�'� S .
o S-c-P �'+� �t- � u�. �`�'ciu'" p' t c h � �1 �o . 5�
„ -t_. .
f vt t e q- (►�la�ri ' �.StfSdvt ' � � �, ��'
i T � . � . • `� �CoG�S �
.� W-t_Sw�' � ��GtQ ���/+L.'� ., ..
�
} '�� �t��- � � �.df �L,� .� N V 2 r �
�
� �
i
;��'�-"' ���� °c- l��S. �''� � � i
� � • '�"�' � a � w�-�. c-'► �,c�'S- c�i
��..._ ., �" . ' ' �
q hc i�, Lj- 1i-^c�rc�� �e s"<c1.�. • �� � �+'
G
� � 'y 4 � �Ct �i"t e ' �t SGv S �C){o � � SaC
� Gc,..p- � «V�-�o4rci.�� ��ir-�QV1� �i U ��
Y
i z � ' .
i
i . , -
c�f s� t�'�
��
w •
uz � ,'
;
iZ1'CL. I,�} - �
'{'C1tT�
"�"� � c �
�&�-�ct�
�x�y C�►�
,,,�,�,� �,,� � � 1t��nd o�a �ei��i.�s
r �q - � ��lill�ll����� M , _
}�IGNATIIREB dF CQNSENT FOR VA12t�,NCE R�OUES�'
�`O: The i�2anning Comm3.ssion, Ci�:y oE Mendo�a. 8eights
FROM: P�opest�r Qwners of ' � �s ! t Z , � � ic�c � �
w
RE:
Gr �1.,. �v v �c �
c't'Cc71� "
�j,�, u �"c t � � �e �c r-�t,.p . ' -- - —
. ��
We the vndexsigned have reviewe8 �he:plsn,s for 5�.b�-w�sion C.a�" �, It��
' • : . atid ••unde�stand �he te�ms: and � .
eanc'i�.�a.ons of �he rec�uesi�e8° v�a��.�o�- bf tc v� �.� t� s�-$. ��'�
: . •
. -
We �e no' ob �• �o thzs ar�eques� ,attd do hereby ve our :
wr�.f:t�n c�nsen� and. cans+�t� ,to' wa�.ve�t of publ�.c hearing. �
SiitCP..relY.
r. us. � - - .
C..aw�t..vov► a- %�cctn c� ��-�'�.
'(._Gi: y
�S-CO�n a1- �V�'�n ti"^{J�4�..1
,. .��� .�.
� r.��r� �- ,M�rtys` r`C�n�.r5a�n
.�cN-�-S��i- G-�"(Gta l��
��i (�k l , (.�sf �►�
�'�2.o�.t.,t r' i�3 � �} �t �- �'r�u S .
_ �- '��( � a � w�-.�- h
.
� ta y� ( � l�'c�E.rc �� �,2 4" t G�
Cc�`� 4� �}l.i �r't e�t SG.v Z
VV�y�c�-� bd�-aG� '�.hwa��
:
,
�f � ►t . 4�}�
Ax1DRES5 {INCL. IATj .
_ �� sv'�`��t��
� 7{t� . St,s��tt'�
� CcA � `"7 t, � l� ��.
� ���s ��-�e�- ��-fZ., ' .
�. u e.�- G�-ove �S .�'Sc377
�.L's{� l i Z i'� `j' ! i1
(�,c�S '���c� i'�-'�
S`�'7 S�#� f� ��'e.
taob S� bt�,� yv��� �« f�
'�7 i Efta�..��-�-
•, 1'IM Vi��ttla C'"_iYrvo .K1[nrrcic�fa Nn:�rst.f� IIJIN. �C�t�a �.,�c. •..,r...
,c �
� ��,�,� ,�� .��.+�i�C�t�►��►. �f�
........._..�....�...�,_.�..� -
' i S2�NA2QRE8 flF C'�?NSE�N2` F'flit 4ARI�NC:F, R�OUEix�.*
! .
:CU: '�he Pl.anning Comm�.ssion, Cit�y ot l�tendo�a Heigh�s
j
FROM: Pzoper�y Owners of ' ' � � � �- � ( c� c
� � � 5 `Z -- .�� '�-
� 1\/ ce�r �5.�. �v v t� c Cc"a1�►
u �"C � c � K �t r`G�..Q— _ '
I
�: � ' (.o�- � t
. I t � ��
�
;
;� .
.
� , - • - � !
We �.e undersa.gaed ilave reviewed �he : plans for S,�b�.� u �slort C
' I : . and ••vuc%a��axtd �he '�erms • and � . �
cond.i�c�s of the rec,�ues�ed° va��.s�e�- �f t� v�a. 'ta.�9,�t � s�, �
� : • . _ '. , _`_` 1
we nave uo� Qn3e�r.i.c�s• r.o r.ru.s arec,�u,es� ,aaa aa r�e�
wri�� ccnsent and canseu� ,�o' wa�.ver a� publ%
, . '
Sincer�.y; � . .
,
r�S (P3.eea�e Prin�� s2GNA2toRE
Z
,�s i •
t.� wtvta vt at- /U atn c Y't�S�C �
�;` . •
;,�o �t'+ �1- ��,�1�, ��Ca.+�^�►to►-ti • '. .
,���e � �- M��--�.�.��'Sa�cn ' .
___.___.
�v�-��ti�- TG-�'rtcia �-�.� ' j.
��$(�� f , L.�f �►�
�
�2t�-.�rt �" � t c� �� _'�" G`r�tis. S � .
t.F {
�..__.___.__
�. -�'�,� S� c�.�, .
� n►� ( � i,�i� � c e��Q a- c c t�, .
�' �� Va �, e � �i scv s
_,�
�-- ,
tA,_ � �1�t �''`y� �
V��G�.�- C6 .s+4 W 4ra. (�� x, Y'1l+sCkv1 �. � �
y z t
� , �
i i
k. • { '
( '
,
�cu, �.aay .
ADDRESS �� C�
J U p Sv,'�C � t
. s � �-t lt �
S' � t�-c 1 � �'�e •
�
i�vil�-�l( 5
�x�y oi
,,,�,�,� ,�� 1��Le�►dLoi�a �c�i���s
_...�.��� -- -�
SIG21A2+IIR�S t�F CaNSEN`I.' FC1R. VAR'I�I.NCE �OIISi;2t �
x'O: The Planning Comm,ission, C�.t�r aF Me,ndo�a. Seights
�'ROM: Property Qwners of '��S f�2 �'� � ('j {dc
�.
i2E:
a
c�,r� � �v v �'t { ! 5 ""Z�
�ju�-ct��� LcQ •
�
0
.�
We fi�ce uudersigned have reviewe$ t.tze:p3.ans �or S�.•b��v�Sia� Ga�` � t��i'
' : .�ud •�pa�'ierstaad �b.e �erm,s . and � .
concia.�.�.ons of �he reques�ed•' v��2�- �f tc v+� � ra,.9 � � s ft�-e. h�S
s . ,
. •
I�Te have �,ta' ab cuYs• '�a th�.s �request ,and do hereby ve our :
Wl",�.�:�1 CCIIS�I'i�..' Sti$ COZx.aP.�Ii'�` �'�"'O� i�E+ l�.YP.�" Ci.�'. �.1..�.C! �2P3�"�.ill�w •
S12tCP�'�.y'r
N� (Please Pr'iu'�}
; LAW��.wYi �4-%Ua1n�`'i �Y'�5�,.
`�'�.'
' �io �� <4- {���. �aw� f' ia�
�
', ����e�r �- i(�!�-��yS� fCUt�dv�
----�_____
�t�.e.g,�lr- ��-�rtc�r�. �'F�`;�`?
' � ��(c,�c� ( � �af 5s� �
�'�?.�w�c. •" �3 t �i�'i Qi" �osrtS .
'�. ��� Sa t w�-Q c-, .
.
�,nv�fr� `� t,�{r��ce- �`2a-<ct,,
�r',ry ck �R �ri � �tSGv S
� r
�1�._yG�- '� �ta ora.11 �� 4savti `�.
�— z
c�R►; 4��; ✓I
ADDRESS (aiCL. 2�'�j .
0
�6� S��#-cEt�'�"c
.. .�7� � Sc��t(��'e
� � (.� '� c� (� �! �i�-�' -
r �{0�5 1��r C^''��
.�h Uer Grt�c}VC„ Cr i.5 .�7%
C.sSi� t, 2,'� �`� t J C>
(�,d,s S��c�� k-'�e
�� 7 S� � f � �'�'e..
rQC)lo � t�aCa. � yY12,�to r�c� f't�'`
�T i {� tc�c.,Je� � -
..�..�....
1.�. �rr__f__ _�_ r+___�__ trr_,�r_�._ �t_7�',.�.NLL.._ =K?►T ........�+ _...._ ._ -.-
. . � .
I
�
I �;1'
` 16�.e�do�a, g�eY
�, ���� �J�
iSiGNAT1TRES t"}�' CONSSI�.' T�`dIt VARI�NG"� R�"sY�UES�
T4: 2�he Pla�uti�tg Commi.5sion� City o� i�e.�do�a Seights
F�tQM. Prape� Owne�rs of ''�� � 2 � ( a c
� � l�i�r �. �v v �c { � 5 2. " .���'�'tca�-,
� `�uf-���
, � .
�: La�-
� ��G
a
i
�� � rG {�s �
( t w2 a.� luS'�rv�.K �"'i
. -� _._...._...�.L .
t c c�. �-cc,v� 4— Co#- S��,_�___
�'o&� -� t t �",`
�
i •. • • �
�, ; �
Re �b,e w�dersignec� have �evies�ed �he ; piaas for S�.b�t v►sio n
' i • : .�nd �undexs�aud �he �ezm�. and � .�/
eond.ztsons og the reqttestec�r ���e�- ia_�_ f_ tc �,�a '_ �S, } � s�
, . x . • r �
We have no' ob e ams- �o thLs �ec,�ues� ,a�ud do hereby ve otu
wri�� cousent and causeati+tia'waiver of publ% heasing.
� '
SiYteetr..�.y, � . .
�
ri� (Pzease Pr` iu�} szGNA2�ORE annl2Ess (�1
1
C. �� °F�a�ncy�j rUs�G. �� `�Ju'
�.,_t , � �� �.
,fio s�c.�► U+ �- � uki>. � a+�.p i a �, � • ' - Sc;
'� �
.��(e �- (v1�.r-i� r�' ,� �vt ' . CcQCQ ``�'.
c� ,� �
` � �� '
�.1�+,-r_S.-4' �G..'(�r`tGta �-�.�/E..'S ` ' �. " � S /cT
� � lcs��- { + L.6'�' �►��__ •(-'�'� l! 2 r �
��-�'' �3 t �� °t-� l•��S , � Ca �` t � �
, � . �
�' •"�-�[ � ct � vv�.e r.1 (,oc� S 5
�
��� hCt �t9 g- l,+-�^c�.rc�� ��.? c'tG.� � �J l � ��
f �4 Ua �-s ���c sc.0 s ta o� S t t�c
. ^�T � �
�Yc�..� �b .D�t�a a��. t1' �c.l� wa�n Z ' " �! � � t�
`r—' � t ; .
�
I �
,���c4`�
�
' ' .
CL. I�(}Tj .
' <<��
L F t Y'{{'
A
�'v �l!? - �r c r S
� 1�y C�►�
�,��,� ,�,� �e�,do�a I-�eig�i.�s
�.,,_..�..,_.�.�.� --- .
s=�rrA�zEs og earrs�r �cni v��.xc� �ou�s� �
�O: The Planning Comm3.ssion, Ci�y oi Mendota Height.s
�'R�M: Prope;rt�,r awners
RE:
't�r 'i'� �c.4 tr CTt �
t.2
�
�ct���'e ��r�C..� .
W
Y't
' � �o�" �c�.�2.. c�� �Vs'�i•wt.h. �"S `
� • .
�tCu�G
.
, �
we the vzzdersignea. have reviewe�t �:he: plai�s iar 5�.b�.tu;sion Ga�" �► t��f
' • : .aad •;unders�and the tezms. and � .
eoncl�.t�a,oas o� �he rec,�ues�edr �rar�:a��i�a�- lo� t c wQ ' o�S � � s f�•�. K�-s
: , • �
. •
We Ytave nq' ob ons •�.o �s areqtite� , attd do hereby ve our :
wri'E.'t�. consen� and consen� ,ta' �tai.v+�x og pubZic �xeari�ng. .
S�Ztce�t.�e].Y.
NAME (Please Print}
E {�aw^�t.varn a-,�atncY �roS�C
_ `t�,
.�^' n�f�» �
� ��''1 �" FU�'V� 'C�Q'y�",Pt {Q�"1
. .
.
.
: ��u+�te� � r��� s' �nd�.Q.rSavt
�In„-e. .�i- �'`�'(C Q �.
�► - '� ._,-,_. � y;„_
' ��i (��- t � L6f �,�
- ��'S�-u-t'' � t �} f'1 �" �c�u � .
. -�.� � � �-�►
- � �
�, �� � i
v�tr9 q� l��r�e �+�a-<cl.,
� �"r'.� 4 �Ct �-�v~� e �t �Gv S
�yt� � �(o o�-a[1 � l�t #+�a�t Z.
t
R
r •�
' �.
..�. ; �--...
��� -
AUD�tESS �INCL. LQT� �
�� "rJu'E-c.tc'��5�.._
�.�_
��A+f �'1'S.�/..._�!_ /"'��.. _�.._ tiT _ _ .1_L... "M"T,.! ..i. �._ _��� w�..+�.+ - .__ • . - ' -
1��e�:da�a
�IGI+tATIIR'Et� O�' CONSE�N'i 2'OR 4ARTANGE Ris,�,iI3ES',�
�e glanz�,ixzg Commission, City ot l�endota Seigh'ts
Prope:zty t3wuers of '�� � 2 � iac
jc�r �. � �c � � 5 2. ` �'�-CoM
i� U T�C t c t" FC �i Y'G�,p ' _
.�
i
We filie undersiqaed hav�e reviewed the : pians �'or ��b�� u
' i . : .aud �unde�s�axtd �ha '�ms`�. ano
conda.t�a.ous of �he reques�ed•' �cr�i.���- k�f tc s,,va '0.9
� s . •
We have xto' ob e�#-a.cnts- �a thts request .and do hereby v
writ-�e.0 consen� and cvn�nti ,�o' waf.ver b� pubZic hearirtg
Sinc�.y, ' � ' . .
� �
►SiC►YC � Ga� �Q !t�-�
,s
�s��^�
� f
.�. ,
e ovr • _ '
. �;
� {P3.ease Prixr�j S ADDRESS (�
I /��
.�`A.w-t,.w,n ar �a�n c 4 r�5x, r•. `�'" a��. C✓c,�i
"'""'"_''"�t ""_: • �
;
�o ,Sr.c.p,�1-� �k- � � � �^!Pr o � ' _• S '? (o Sc.�
>"�u�te � �- M�rt ,��n�.r�avt - � �
ei � �
,�+'".t-s�-� „��`-'�-tctc�: ��,`�'e:`? • �. � �tc�S �
� �
• �� ic�G�- ( r!_a'�, is� �..�.-K v e r- G
j���,,�� �
1�.�,t. •- ,�3 t r} � ; �- c.'cau. s . �" {� t , '
. �-�` Sa w�.c~� (s„C)S �
� � .
� 10 � i� �� q� t���� e� �� s- c'c 1�, � 'S`� 7 S�'
��,
E-c 1{ �'�e.
��r ��� .
�►e. E� 3�'zs7?
, ,
, , .
r d A� i�% �`'i ��i SGv S �0 0�0 ���sCo. yVl2wto rt�. � Y
_ �..� �
v0.yc,� � A�t� a�-a!� S�Inwrz�'�.. � • S t I � c� ��- %-
z- _ ,
� t � •� " .
, �
�
� � . �
Clty O�
.�.. .�► � 1Viendota Heights
October 20, 1994
Mr. Reith Heaver
Heaver Design. and Construction
875 Mendakota Court
Mendota Heights, NIl�T 55120
Dear Mr. Heaver:
Your application for a Subdivision will be considered by the
Planning Commission at their next regularly acheduled meeting,
which will be held on Tuesday, October 25, 1994. The Plan.ning
Commi.ssion meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here are City Hall
in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Commission consideration.
If you have any queations, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Revin Batchelder
Administrative Assista.nt
RLB:kkb
Enclosures
6
�
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vlendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850
T0:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
October 27, 1994
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
SUBJFCT:' Case No. 94-33: General Pump, Inc.
1
DISCIISSION
Mr! Del Erickson, Architect representing General F
'appeared before the Planning Commission at their October
request;the following variances:
1.
2.
3.
>, Inc. ,
�ting to
Driveway setback variance for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1,
Northland Plaza to allow a shared driveway. �
A ten foot side yard variance to improve t�e truck
turnaround area.
A twenty foot front yard sign setback variance.
�
The Planning Commission's main concern on this re
that an;appropriate easement be established and filed
County to provide for the shared driveway's use and that
variances�be applied for that are a result of the shared
i
RECONIl�2LNDATION
,
I
The Planriing Commission voted unanimously to �
following variances:
�
st was
th the
future
.veway.
t the
1. � A ten foot (10' ) driveway setback variance along i-494 to
� allow a"bump out" for truck maneuvering.
2.
3. �
�
n
A twenty foot (20') front yard sign setback variance.
A ten foot (10') driveway side yard setback variance to
allow for a common driveway between Lots 3 and 4, Block
1, Northland Plaza Addition all subject to the f�.ling of
an easement or dedication which establishes the shared
driveway with the understanding that should the applicant
desire to use the other parcel, a vacation eould be
sought. �
ACTION RE4IIIRED
�
If City Council desires to implement the Planning Comm
recommendation, a motion should be passed granting:
i
1.; A ten foot (10') driveway setback variance along
2.
3.
JED:kkb
allow a"bump out" for truck maneuvering.
A twenty foot (20') front yard sign setback var
A ten foot (10') driveway side yard setback var
allow for a common driveway between Lots 3 and
1, Northland Plaza Addition all subject to the f
an easement or dedication which establishes th�
driveway with the understanding that should the a;
desire to use the other parcel, a vacation c
sought.
ssion's
-494 to
�nce to
, Block
ling of
shared
�licant
►uld be
>' �
DELANO ERICKS
���-�.�� ti �;�_.1�
� 7416 1
1 M
�..._. .:
October 4, ` 1994
!
;
�
City of Me� dota Heights ,
1101 Victona Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Re: Gen�eral Pump
Commission Number 9422
Gentlemen:�
This letter � f intent is in conjunction with application for variance on the above Y
P
defined on attached Drawing Sheets A-1-R, A-2-R, A-3-R and A-5. Specific item
approval aze as follows:
1. Relocate driveway to be centered on property line as a shared drive and acc
both parcels. The hazdship of installing two driveways on the nanow fronl
the ,tight curve of Northland Drive makes a shared drive a better, safer solu
2. Revise setback to truck maneuvering drive azea to vary from 20' to 10' to 1
with{ dock, along south property line. The hazdship of maintaining 20' cr�
tighter truck maneuvering to east requiring double movement by truck. Sc�
area to freeway will be maintained by height of berm and plants.
3. Sign� variance of 20' setback as shown on Sheet A-5. Hardship of topograF
curve provides for poor visibility and a higher elevation above street at 40'
We propose an 8' high pylon with logo and a company name plate sign on
retaining wall (backdrop which transitions the slope).
Please con �
tact us if you have any questions or reqiure more informatton.
Sincerely, �+
i
,-DELANO E�I�KSON ARCHITECTS
Del Eric�lEson, AIA /
DE/t1t
f �
Attachments
cc: ' Mr. Mike Christoferson
General Pump, Inc.
w b j�cFCS� /Q BC,N/ rL�=y�j .
ARCHITECTS
Y2ATA BOULEVARD
�EAPOLIS MN 66426
612 - b44-8370
ect as
for
ss for
;es on
on.
; parallel
;s a
�ning of
y and
;tback.
.ce of
r�
♦l,►llll
� .1�� O�
1��ie�►do�a Heig�ts
� AFPLICATION FOR CONSID►ERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case Na. a �- ��
Date of Ap licatioa lU - �} -
Fee Paid O • C:
Apglicant Name; G��-� �ii is,c� t NC1. PH•
(Lasc) (F'ust) (�'�
Adclress: _ � i'l �{ MQ�"F(C.au�l �(b(U'�,✓ .j.�/Z.d
(Numher & Street) {{�ty} {State) (Zip}
Owner Name: � �.S' � �`'�� —''
(I,asc} (F'ust} (Mn
Address: � �"-� "
(N,umber 8c Street) (City) (state) C�P)
Stceet Location of Property in Question: i i�7�{ � b�l.hu.�) ��,i121U �.
I.egal Description af Prt�perty:
'I�pe of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Pemnit
Conditivnal Use Peimit for P.0 D,
Plan Appmval �
Comp�ehensive Plan Amenc2naent
Agplicable City Ordinance Number �DI
_..s� van��
Subdivision Appr+oval
Vtretlands Permit
Other (attach ezplanation)
Section
Present Zo�ng. o�f•ProPerE� � Fresent Use • V A c.�w �i"' �
Propased Zoning of Pmperty ,; � Ptaposed Use -�
I hereby dedart ihat ali statements made� in this requ and 1
materi� � tcue. .
ignature of plic,an;
. ��. � g �
��� �
(Received by - Titte) " •
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, .1ViN • v5118 452 • 1854
•r
! �
i
' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
� NOTICE OF BEARING
,
October 17, 1994
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of
Heights�will meet at 8:15 o'clock P.M., or as soon as
thereafter, on Tuesday, October 25, ].994, in the City Hall
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnef
consider, an application from General Pump, Inc. for
variances to allow the construction of a ahared driveway
Lota 3 and 4, to enlarge the truck turnaround at the sout
the site and a sign on the following described property:
Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Northland Plaza
More particularly, this property is located at 1174
Drive. �
This notice is pursuant to
No. 401.� Such persons as desire
proposed Variances will be heard
1
�
r
,
Cit�r of Mendota Heighta
to be heard with refere
at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
Mendota
�ossible
Council
ota, to
setback
between
iendof
i
�
�
Auxiliary aids for disabled peraoas are available upon
at least 120 hours in advaace. =f a notice of less t
hours is received, the City of Meadota Heights will mal+
attempt to provide the sids, however, this may aot be p
on short aotice. Please coatact City Admiaistratioa
1850 with requests.
�
�
l
I
i
i
!
�
I
1
to the
�equest
�aa 12 0
: every
rssible
�t 452 -
0
October 20, 1994
Mr. Del Erickson
Delano $rickson Architects
7415 Wayzata Boulevard•
Minneapolis, NIlJ 55426
Dear Mr. Srickson:
Clty O�
1Viendota Heights
Your application for �Tariances will be considered by the Planning
Commisaion at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be
held on Tuesday, October 25, 1994. The Planning Commission meeting
starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here are City Hall in the Council
Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the
meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission
consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Revin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
RLB:kkb
Enclosures
cci Mike Chriatoferson, General Pump, Inc.
a
�_
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850
e
�
REPORT
DATE:
CASE
�:.� ����•�,�::.r����
CONSLILTINZ: PLANNE.ktS
LANL?SCAPE ARCHITECTS
3{l0 FiRST AVEiVtJE IdC?R�'H
SUITE 2td
MINNEAP(JLIS, MN ��aO1
G12•339�330�
APPLICANT:
�
LOCATION:
#-
ACTION REQUESTED:
�
i
�
PREPARED BY: �
i
�
PLANNIItiTG CCINSIDERATIONS
�
Background
�
October 24, 1994
94-33
General Pump, Inc.
11�4 Narthland Drive
Variance Driveway
Sign Setback
C. John Uban
Generai Pump received a building permi# from the City Councit in September after a r
site plan. GG�nneral l'ump owns the adjacent 1ot ta the west wluch is not being develope
The Gity Cauncit wanted a common driveway on the praperty line between the h
requires a va�riance. The permit was granted initially without a variance and General Pc
back ta reqizest the variances that they had discussed with City Council. The other varia
is for an adjustment to their driveway in the loading area to better accommodate
movements for loading activity. Also they are requesting a variance in the sign set
consistent with other sign setbacks in tha Northland Industrial Pack
�
�
1'he General Pump building now under construction and their adjacent lot front on Nc
and I�ighwa.y 55. The site aIsa has frontage on Interstate 494 where the truck docks are
City Council has approved a hernung and landscaping plan far the building and loadi
perforrnance of that screening is proposed to stay in tact.
!
� �
Mailed notice has been sent by staff to the surrounding landowners and a public h
required.
attd
ew of their
t this time.
Iats which
� has come
; requested
!ck turning
;k which is
dand Drive
�ated, The .
area. The
will be
October 24, 1994 Case Page 2
Requested Variances
The common driveway requires a variance for zero lot line setback for driveways. The ordinance
requires a ten feet setback from the side yazd. Both lots can be well served by a common driveway
while allowing a better utilization of the properiy and since the properiy is under the control and
ownership of General Pump, the shared drive conditions do not present a hardship to the adjacent
property. When the property is sold, a common maintenance easement should be placed over the
common driveway.
The variance is also requested for the driveway accessing the loading dock on the southern edge of
the properiy. This is along the right of way line for I-494. The site plan shows a ten foot bump-out
at one point to allow trucks to make a better turning movement to get in and out of the loading area. .
The rest of the driveway maintains the 20 foot required setback. Also the Landscape Plan and
Grading Plan have been adjusted to accommodate the required bernung and landscaping as approved
by the City Council. If the trucks do not have enough room to maneuver, they will sometimes plow
into the planted trees along the driveway in order to make their turning movements. In this case
providing ample turning room and adjusting the landscaping will have a long term benefit to the
healthiness of the required screening.
Sign Variance
The proposed sign is a low profile monument sign consistent with other signs in the Northland Park
area. Although this development is not under the control. of the restrictive covenances of United
Properties, it is by design, maintaining the general sign design appearance. The detailed plans for the
sign show a landscaped area. around the sign terraced into the sloping gade down to Northland
Drive. The sign includes the inirials "GP" on a decorative concrete background. The sign appears
to be approximately 8 feet long and 8 feet high, the dimensions were not fully expressed on the plans.
The requested setback is 20 feet consistent with other signs in the industrial park where there are well
landscaped monument signs integrated into the design of the overall area. The Planning Commission
may want to confirm the sign dimensions, height, and materials since they were not noted in the
application.
Action
Hold public hearing and make recommendation to the City Council.
(�' � - � �/ - � ---- � - �. �!/ y — -- - -- ---- � �� Ap 11► VI' . .y .,
�.• ; •� ,1 i' �j. � . i! 1���' •.t`�`
�.' . I � `'� r�l ��� ''' �.�'II, � � � ...+,�ey:.;�•t:
,, � ,r1 . �, r �, ; ..,��y, , , , � .,, .i� ,.,, •, �t :._., }.;�t..
-• -- -- -�- — - -- - - _ _ I 'I t �i � , . _ . . � ., .;•. �;; :,,..>. .
� �I� ��� � ��I'�, �•i � ����,,1 '� � �; �•
- - - ,�: EXEC TIVE DR � �I � �u -' ` � � h � (; �� j, �I N
� � I ,� '� � ' t� �� r � 1 � � , I � 1 � •��.� �
. .. V� Z N � • �',,I. I ���,I ��, ' � i�q,�!. �;' �,''�••
n O C � � � �, ,r ..�,
a a0 W � � _f . . • � � ���� i �
._a '�%.
— - -m. _ —m-.'• - - : f --"'—'-- , ( _ �- -. ------•-, — �'s�= _.,..�� fn�1-...—� "'.1- ' C `,,— � - - - - --- - -
_ � � I ' . • � � �� � �A �o �` •
• � � � ' I • .. � • J . ' � �''r � � • �� �� � C n
o O 1 • i �..�jf 2 .� z
- -p ` . ` . � �,� �
m . � � � �•�.
.
-�0i \ `• � � z
�{ ' ! � � m'.
:���`� �•;�:� . . •
•/ . '% ,.� � ��' O s
•` � ' � • •,�/
�� � �.-� � � � F =� Q .
/ �; : _ \ �.� , __ t � � • • • • • • � • • �• �• � • • • • .
RM TAi / � �
_ _ � 11� � • • • • � • • �
` � ���� � � • •
• • • • • � • � � '� • ••
� � ,� � � .... _�� —�� • • t � • • • • • • • • • • • � •
• •
�� • • ,•.• i • . . . • • • � • • • • • • • • • • � •
► .� \ �
•,� � � � t , . .•. , . . . .
/ . � .� •. � r I I i • �I� lU 1 ., . � • • • •
�I • •
.f•.'� • ' � . I�� \`) I � � ��I�) (� I I I��'I�I11 . _ .
. . I I ( � • •
:;' • � � i. _� . � j1 �. ��� �� q�ll � III'II�I � �IN • ` • . • •
•, , — }�-},-�, � I�f I�IIIt I I , I ��
: � i ��l��l ( ����� �I � �� '�
� ,•: .'� t� I�� �� �� ���'II�'��' I�+I���Ij� �. �1 `• �� �
.. m • �� �� I.�I II�I ') '±I I�I (� ( �'lll f I'�I , • I� . , .
. ��'�r�r�"';+� � 11 �� � � ► ' �c� �' q .— �
, �,�.�u4.::u�*'' �' i i, - � � : , , ' ' I ; • '
.,. i ��� ,sj � •� A _� . � �`, � j • �---_ � • ' �
- — — --�1`� • -:�—�-;1—�- - � --j-�—;� —. - — � . -
\ � � `` ! I (I I. � ' 1 `' �, � � � '�- —r
, .. � � �� .. 1; ' I e i' i � , � �'
� ' � �� �,, �^i , 11 � ' � ,��' � �' �i • , ,�'t1�d �, �I � � � � I' ' " I
— - -- • J� i ���� i�' 1FI � i �� "'� • . �, i ' ;, i : � ; ;.,.,
-� �-- - .� _, � ��� � ii ' ., �� � • I i � ' ��, �ar,;, ,,► �y
' , I 1,•.:' ,'� _ \ I ' ,�; � �„ �� ?I�'�� .,. • � •I11 �(1i'� I�� � I,��,!� �.�� ^zsi
I ' I � I , � i��~ ��� �'� � � I� '' ,'���, I �I) �ill�qlil�•' �I � I�I �
I� � I �� � ''�. t�. � 1. t � ' .I ,• I'i 1 ( I � '��i'� I, • �� � •
� �
I�I�II'� • � �� i< ; • • . � . • '�: ,�' �I'�I���,l I �.1°�� ��� . ��q�,
�I� II�,I��'I � • •• / ��� c � � ' •11!f f''�'•,},d • • • ��:•'
I. I I9�I I.� � � ;.� ,rte� ..�•.,..,..�.� • • I-' , i _ \ � ��',
' � � �. � - i � — ' , I '•'T'� �!' � a SE � 3'��',' � ..1'" _� �7t;':
. I I � `b ��� 1•` 1N��n �aa/' , � � � `
. ' ' be �°`a`�d N�°Y�1 .o''° •i���\ `, � — i D A
i �� d� N �L.o �'� \ � Q .
�-�' .pN L •ya�°. '�` `� z
��. 6Nd�y �0 �,9` " -e>�a '•.�
� ris •���,�+ / . ��,��y N �' b�J.00 ��3a°
� ��'�� 4�''• aAd d N • : » - - ia
��. � • » �
� , • Cv�' � ' � �O h �' OD
•� p_� � ♦, y i o W W �D
� � . � � ��a ,� ,�C. . w ., �
, � �' '�, ' • w w`� � N , � �' .:
O��a � d ' °' � A
O O ` a � 4i y r*i
.. _ .. �� . � __ , �� 6p "�
�� N`��/ I �i ,
� . �, �,
�
. `' �
�
� �
�.,,- 4�8 t�
5.8 :,
^ , '':'.�:': O ' R•aesa� � ��
����.
�,,
N t J
�
•m 24
6 W
' V A`
� .
e
::�+ � �o- � u
\� a
ar
::i
e•
�
0
� �
�
♦ 1 �
�":•::'::: {�'r.{�: �'• �l � ti41)7 � �246
'• •f': ��: �•'�.•:���'�'}•• ti�,' :••�• �.'�:tiY.•.S. . : .•.•� 6 / S
� . . .. . . • - - .._._.. .. . _ '•,•:`: ::•. • . .._ ... .. . ....... . . . . ' .... .: •�. . O w� .. S i3
..•� �
;V
, V �
W
.'`
�
'�
I
� �
A I
,1
�
„
\� , , -
. '
.. 1
0 83.97 �7� r,^,
.
.
�� <
7 w '� ry `~
o�°jn;° w ^
�, � `� �� �
� N y / �, _
• -- -- --- -- � % � voN ���
Ci O C ro ' . r�'v� y co .
�� � • � `� �•w "' �►
""� ����' %�
m= �n � � � .� p ��,, v
Q� �
_ � � � �� A� � (,�a ,�b `�04 � �' ,�. Ci
II � ,��„�f^ �7 GI� � � W ^
N �o N � � � (n v� 'o
r�V �
O � � N - � - n
: � � D
� ,� I — i ,� 413.��
�im <, � � � •, .,o,. � .
. ,r � � - -� .� � �.
+ • . � � �
� '9r9`.`�t.1 * �a �v» � • �A ��f 6.�3,���� N rn � \
Z�.q�6 'fJ•. r,� M� � � :��•, ���., _a .D
so p x p� �/�,j� �,r. �,. ;; c
MINN. OEPT. OF TRANSPOTATION RIG NT ��' ���.r NN oE�'� ��.`'�;
=a'�?c+ n,26.,e.ec.
OF WAY P LAT N0. 19— 42 = .. .T � 0
102.46 ^ !: n%A�iy�, � � [� .� � , 21� - . `
_ _ _p::� . .. . jr� - ' Ry, ?, .
- - _ �z• aas°z��r' _ , ,i . 'c� c.',• `: ,Q '
. -- - — - -- ..F�:���'''�.x,,. ..�..T� N `�'�s'°'—"�,, j—.�
I-35E
' • � '�� �:.x'.�c: : � ,���'°':2 - � �
. .;► _
—r•
u isiQav ��v�
�
5 v.,lhm,� �-�c� c�.�- (—� -
�n+g o�- ��—�-�- � �
�� ��O , .
.__-� - -.___..__._. ....-- -�- ---- �1 �
; ..._____.--- ��(;�7=-�.
_ ���
,, - � ��ti���
,-: �
/ f� I '�
j- � ; .. .. . _ • .
� . • � t � ~`� �`'.. � ��71-�,
. ' .■r�,;, • � �k�G'� �L, �
. � . ■��■/.
� �
� �Q � '�I
� � � : . . . � ����'
_ � � . . --- .
�: .�: - � � _ . . - . . . - . : . ----- -. ..
J�, A �` : �;� .. .. ,h..^�„�:�;,; �. . " • ..
l :;�--` .. k.- � '�� '��'�*;� • • -- . � .
:j..�. .q.�_. � S
. . • . i �!i;.•` . • �
; � • ' ; �' . . .
_ . '' .• . , • � ' • ` • t� �. � .• ' ` - .
-:l�j. � � � ' - .. -- -.-.-.,
;,�� . -���.���� , • . • . - .. •
--�' � ' .� . • ' � �.c • � � ' •
� . _
q; , '' -
� �
. ��
I '� /
� �
o_, _— - -
�.� ---- - -_..-- � -- -- .
� ; .�.
9.i
1
. ; �,
. =e � �
, �� +-- - --�.
.;
. �
�
, � �. -
��-�� � - -- a�r� �
. �� �N��!� �
- ��i���
'��
bi�
_* .._
-1'�
� s�,�'� j,�; � 1 �, � � � I � l.n �, ' .�-�''�� ;
-Yr � %� � �� 1'�J � �, .;;J ''�•.: �•;:
I ��i� ��>/�» �I %� _�___
� r ��-� 'JJx, u._
h ��i���-
,
,� .
J=;
,
;�r (�r"�!'
i
��.ILL♦
�
october1 28,
1994
.
1'
1Viendota Hei
Mr. Del; Erickson
Delano Erickson Architects
7415 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneap� lis, NIl�T 55426
Dear Mr. Erickson:
�Your application for a Variances will be considered by
iCouncil�at their next regularly scheduled meeting,
�
'held on'Tuesday, November 1. 1994. The Council meeting f
7:30 o'�Iock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambe�
'or a representative should plan on attending the meeting
�that your application will receive Council consideration
f
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me
�
Sincerely,
' EJ
� l��
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
�
RLB:kkb�
'Enclosures � �
cc: Mike Christoferson, General Pump, Inc.
I
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118
�
I
o�
ts
�he City
will be
tarts at
s. You,
in order
• 1850
.
k
�1
a,
, TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Mayor, City Council and City
October 25, 1994
Administ
Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECTi Franson/Perron Property
�
DISCIISSION
For sometime, we have had negotiations for the acqui
the two�remaining parcels of vacant land in the Mulvihi
In August, we offered the owners a price of 1.00 per sq
for theiland with the owners paying pending assessments
they countered at $1.10 per foot with the City assumin�
assessments.
We? have continued discussions on the property anc
' revised�offer from the owners at a price of $1.10 per foot
assessments in the amount of $25,370 to be deducted :
purchase price. This amounts to about 15 cents per foot.
i
We�believe that the proposed offer is a fair price
give the City ownership of approximately 7 1/2 acres i�
development location. In the past, Council has expressed
over the eventual development of this property alonc
Boulevard. City ownership of the property will insure
City has the utmost control over the eventual land u�
purchase will be made in the Tax Increment District and a
for the�eventual sale should be discussed if the land is a
'The only remaining property in the area will be the two hc
, along Pilot Knob Road which make up about 1 1/2 acres .
� time no xaction is considered for the purchase of the homes
both owners are aware of the City's interest in purchasi
property.
�
future
LES:kkb
ition of
L ° area .
�re foot
:o which
pending
have a
aith the
rom the
and will
i a good
concern
Acacia
�hat the
e. The
process
cquired.
me sites
At this
although
aa their
ider the purchase offer for the land and the ossible
le of the entire parcel.
���`? �-�-
�i�,7 ��,�.�o
�
Exhibit A
I.ocation Map
�
STATE HWY. 55
NORTH
�"�� .
�
� . -
�
W .:
H �
a
w
e A � �
� -� 3...$$�,aoo a .
a �rrsoN & �orr Q+
� A
� W
H N
U H
� U� -- 1�...$Zo,000 z
�` .,�: . : $66, 000 P�N �
: � � �xs°N ;5...:$so,000
. - > g�rz
� P=LC}T KN4B ROAD � CO . STATE AID RD .. 3 T �
ACACIA CEMETERY
���,!/I F'orm No. !81? -1 ta.�. srezr e�u�•a.Y�. �,s e«�,.
• � VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
� i rn� rom, ��a ay u,� M« �a�, a
, R�Al.'tt�Rs°P Minnasots As�dat�on a REALTqRs
� dlx(aNns anY IIabIWy ulainp aut ot use or misuae d tMa hrrti.
� t oate OCtober 18 1994.
i 2��� . �
I '
3 RECElVED OF �i �� n� Mendota Keights , .�. .
4,�gg�qf �lna H�mclrPtl and'no�100 —— • ppqeig(�'1.Q0.�0 • t
s. by crtEac �s eam�t mot,ey w be deposi6ea upon ao� w P�m�e apre«ment br.a p�Mbs,'on a be�o�e ai. nma
6 Ewdnesa dsy after �, Gt a tru�t eccount of isUr�g bt+oiaer Ewt b bs rehtrtwd b Buyer �t � J�eement is rat �d bY
T.Setter. Satd eazn�t nbray is part payrnent ior the ptxd� a( ihep�o�ty loated at �'7A7 ?"7_5700{�--03i _02„
g 27-57000—OG.0-02 and 27-57000-050-02
&Gityd._.Mend�t�.tiP.igh.fi� �(?aaityoF��,kota ,Sta�edMlrr�om.
1Q IegaA�r destxil�ed a� .*� LI�, raference . ' '
11.
i2 � Ute ioivNing pmp�rt�, Y atryy ownad by Sei�r and b�Ceied On eaid ptapedy. AM Garci�n buba, plert�, eFNtatu Ixld U'ee� �nd Iaao the foAow4tp
13, peraona{ propeny; None .
14. aM oF wt9c11 ptoperly SeMer` has this day agr�ed b seN b 8try�9r fot fhe 8u» of: —
,� - xoo - - �.s��,s�'� °�'�
� wra�: e� a� »�ay h�e t�owr,� r�: ,� nw�ey a s.3 ao . oa ana s 1 .
tz cash an or bekxe De�emb � 1. 1994 tta dela d dos�, end y�e, � ot S 0
i8 by finaraitg in ar,00tdartice w�h the att�cFsed fin�dng addendtxre
i9: Asssusnptian Conteaet for Lteed Corara�i�aiai Pu�chaae Monett 14ftortg,tt�e Other
i •
�l2 Si�EGl1l. COtfE'tNGEF�CSFS: ihfs Pucisase ABreecrierR !s subject ta the ionv�vkig � arid N the faNaNvtnp cAnHnyencies ctreda�d beiow
2i. casnot be �'ied or �,e►ved� h�, tti Bua+er by' Noile. ,�,,,� t�ks P� ly�eement shall becanrns rw1
rd. a„a wta ai,a a11 earr�st ma�ay ahallae refundNd w�e Buyq� eu�+era ena seMo�a apee a eipn e canoetadon a the Pur�ase npsemerx.
23 iSetect ePProPriate qkbns }a�t�}
24. O{a} BUYER� SyEI!_ER ahaN pwide a ce�Uc�aOa cf s�n�ey # the p�operi� ffi BllYER�i � lLER e�ue� not !� than _ .
2a � � 1�..�_. . ' .•
2� O i� w75'� �9 � d+n��P � P� �9 P� $t�d �Oi�s at BUY �� S��.i�Et� �pB[LSfI.�.:'' .
� � ..
21. O(C} BuYe�' ab��g eWprov�d d�bm�aP � P�P� ��� P� et BUY �/ S�sE1LER r�ensa
2a a(c� Buvp�' obteir�g app�o�l d dh�iwrut�ip br ramrang or use pe�rr� ec suYE�t � e�cpen�e:
�
"9. �(e} Btty� ab�ir�irrp ffi BUYER�/ � e�cpets�, pet�rotaik�t� issfs wt�idt ara aooeptebie b Buyec
�
a❑(i} Buye�' abfair�g � BUY �/ 5�F1LER �, soil t�ts wNdt td�ala that the p�operry re�aY �����!�Y �9
3t. r►ietl�ods a ccst. � . � .,
32 Q(g� Buydr obtaY�irSi a�ov�l d bu�ng pt� eutdbr speaCic,�lor�s in accatdarw� Nt�tt �r rt�caddd a�.ibdvEsion caret�at�ls �td apptvn�i d
33 tlie �ual cor�Ld oortwr�ee. '
34. O (h) Ui�iEfC {
35. �
36 Seqei'a � ior tl�ese �g�es (M erM ehaN not �omead S
3T: SeMar � per� d aooeas ta the ptope+ty for tastktp end surveyit�p ptsposes. .
38. P1F1�1.SE NU7E: &ryer tney kxxar addkioc'�ai c�sarges krip�wittg ttte prope�ty ix�acin� 6ut no[ irr�ied ta Fiook�cp andhr a�s d�s, tr�ipai
39l d,arges„ �b br se�ver aooess s�bbk�g aa�s, v� earsss, perk cledic�ion� roea aooe�, ut�tr «xr�Won and � lavs, c�n c�
4Q ard Uee plartJng charges. �
41. To the best ot tlto Sete�e lmo�+Aecf�e ft�e are ra he�cdotts wesEes. ebandot�d w�ela, ar urxlery�ncird ak�@a 1m�f�, e�t.as t��kt ncAad.
42 SPEqIU. WARHAM'IES: Seqerl������� F�^�'property desaf�ed h thl's Puc�e AyreecrretX a�atsffi d
qg, 133r;.812 p� pUppE �� p�y� �� jndustrial .
4a. Seaer vvarre�rb tl�t tha pmperry I��� the design�ed �iao ysar Aood piah en�a.
45� SeGer v�arsat�s thet U�e pto{�erty Di�NOT7„J�eEve pteFeret�tiel tmc ka�#rr�ent (Es:� Cxeett Acres, eiG}.
fl#
4Q �16d 8!@ Cii101' � YYE11C11 8[8 ��8 �ti fli Uli.4 � i�13BtYlt3tk. �ttlBf � Cf p0(�0S Lpi CR191}
I
4T. DEEJD,7tiulFW�EFABt� TITLE: Upon parbm�oe bY Bu5'� SeMer ahel de�var a �enera 1 Vyarrar�ty pegd jdned
48, h b!' Sp�. K�!4 �eY�O � CNe4 subJec� ta • � ' �.
49�(A BultNrg arid la�; «rWu�'�s, etafe and tader�l ►egulallo� Restrictbr�s b use ar hiprou�mer�t d the wMtauC eltectt�e
SQ ia� ptcrrisior� Fieserv�ion d�rty tnhe�ai rigt�s by tlt9 �d t�rnesota,�(C� �d tireis� �senletdsaw� do not hiertete
51. wdh �8 ��� �(El �Sitth o( tenanb as toNoyvs (t� aped8e�d, rwt aut�jed b�� .
52, �
53 {�} OUiets �Nt� be spedf3ed h vv�ng�. . . . .
54� Tti'LE & EXAMlNAiiON: Sei�c �,wkhirt a ceasatiabie tirs9 aliet' $oceptattce d i6�tsagr�em�r�t, kmish en abslrec� of t'tSe: or s tegfsleted
i5. P�Y ebstred, oe�tiCied b dab b�tndudeproper �es ra�e�ing bef�iut�es, ste0e arW lede�l lpmerMs arid , and iev�ed ar�d
56� ���nenis. Buyer shad be aAakued 10 Yusiness days ai6ar tscei�t at absttr�ct for sa�nat�aipaf � artd ��i� ��x� v�i
5l. be marie fn wrkirg ar desmed walvad. M ary abJedbn fs eo made, Seler almN hare W bu�neas deys irom d a wtiflen titla
� objecUau b nabfy Buyer of Se1er'a iatertloc� b maim t113e martaNabie wiWn t20 days kam Selee's� ot such wr#ten abjeetion. t# noNce is
' �� �tteret� teqi,�ed shaM be posWoried penctkig CortecAion c�t 1iHes btR upon conecUun d�t(e and wNhirt 10 days afler �vritlen notice
�orrected wid�n the tirrie w�ide�i foS �S Pixd�ase�g� � tx/ and oold� aplioti FiuYer: netU�er pertY a� be�Qabls kx�darz�g�
�, tieceu,aer ta t(�e ou,�� s�,a eart�st n,a,ey+ ah� be �[u� euyer; auyrir sr�d se�er aQree a aign c�atia, d T�s euyer
63 b�ocept +an owr�''8 tiYtl9 h the ful eunount d fhe pud�se prb9 h ieu of an � ot title Y theprt� is b e ma5ier
sa. � a r ra e� a t�e �s �n°�'s.i�rs po�r� a con�ml. a ts to recanre sucn poicy m the t�e �carr�r�t'an���erioa shalr oa,xn�e
6`�6 d'��ahed,�andg oNy the�additio�ao� d ob� �� �•� a��'s P�� oU �d (�Bt�ye�` �1 p�tlieap�m
67. ior �e laridei's poN��l�. I
1
68. Seqer etid Buyer kkitU21: Seller � Btry�r D�►
� t� vt�t � �
�•::��;:
'>x :
:; ,';:::
' `°:�i�
,��,.
:`_.
. .cw:
.i'
�:v�1� x
:;-,
: �=;;.
..`.;�;
�%-:��:
:'...�
u: �
'f �:_.t :
,.
; �.:.
' : �... -:
•' ;:;<.
:, ��;:
: °���
'D,//I Form No. YB1�J •Z (fter.9187! M(UvD�v4 Lega! FMmz
• VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGRE�MENT
' �q. oate October 1$ , 199 .
T!. Page 2 ot 2 Paggs
72. REAL ESTA7E TAXE3 shaq be pald as tolbws: �' y
T3. Suyer shaft pa}, .prorated trom day ai c�i� 0 t2t eii,_nane reai estate tsxes due arKi payabte In the year 19 94 :
74. Setler shad pay, prorated to day ot clos�ing 12ths ell nane roal estate ta�s due and payable ki the year 1994
75. tn ihe everd the dasing date is changed tha real es pald shall, N Prorated. be adJusted b the new c�Oskp date. Setier wartar�ts
76. tazss due and paye6ls in the yem' 19�,_ wi ESTEAD dassifi�ion. Se� a� ta P$Y �+9'�' ��i9 S�_
7� due 8t�! paysbta tJeEther S�etter na' ABe�(s} maEa� ar�y tB{xeser�b�dng�amotxrt of at�qu�� taroe�s. � becort�e
79 SPECIAi. ASSESSMENTS shaIl be pald as fuAow�
80. BUYER AND SELLER SHALL PRORATE AS OF THE DATE OF CLOSINCi ! SELLER SFIALL PAY ON DATE I�F CLOS! aN
ww..+w
8t. fnstallrt�erks a special as�rtienb oerttrwa ror paymerK wia► are reai es�e mxe�due and � the yeaz *
��.--------�. Assessments estimate ta be 23, 10 shal edu�ted
82 BUYER SHALL ASSUME t�SELLER SFIALL PA'V�pn dffie d t�Osk�g aN otl�er spedal �srner�s levie�f as of the date Of t�Oskig.
'�'"'�` *fram sale proceeds.
83 8!lYER SHAIL ASSUME ELLER SHALl. ?ROVti3� FOR AAYMEN'i 8pedel e� parKArtp ms ot the ciffie aE Ci� kX
�aa. «.j--
sa. rnprovemerMs u,at r,ave beer► oraered by tl,e c�y Ct�ca or ort�er a�skig sutho�ties. {seHers pravision !or payment shalt.ba
h e
85. esaiarv d Mo (7} times the es4rt�ed a+na�rt d tlie a�►�nb. a less as iequired bY 8vyer"s �) BUYEA SHAU. A0.�Y �*�
8& on tiate of t�asirsg anyr de%rred reat estaie ta�s {is.� Green Aaes, e1c.) or speciat essessments paymard of whkh si, required as a restAt at
87. the cbsing of this sala Buyer shaN p real sstate taxes due and paya6le &a the yea�' toflowk� dosing and thereaftar and anY ixspaid special
88. essassmerds payabte tliereudth arrd�tlhereafte+; the payrnent ot rvhkh is not oiheivvise provided.
89 ACCEFfANCE: Buye� utxfatstands and ag�ees that tF�a F'u�chaso is st�bject io ac�p�taitce by SeHer in tinp Agents are not Nabls
90. or respons�le ior any cavenants, obOgaUons or vvarrar�ies mede k►�1�hase A� � br�' �agerKs arew Ila6Te b tetutn or at�our�t
91. tai the earne.st money. itte deliver}r af ali papera end rtwntes shaq be made at
ez tr�sa�cr�ox; euye� n�s me c�M w�a �o�nv ��o ao�•
Q3. GENF�tAL WARRANTIES: SFJ.I.ER WARf3t1NT5 THAT'f'!tE BU1LDti�"3S. � ANY. ARE ENiiRE1X WtTti1N TNE BOUNDARY i�ES O�'iHE
94. PRCIPEHTY. SEL4ER WAARANTS THAT THERE IS A RIGHT OF ACCESS 70 THE PRC}PEF�TY FRGM A PUBUC RIGFiT OF YYAY. THESE
95. WARRANTtES SklALl. SURYfYE THE DEtlYERY 4� iHE QEEE} OR CONiRACi FOR DEED
9& SELLER WARRANT'S THAT PRIOR'10 THE CWSINfl DATE PAYMENT IN FItLL WtLL HA1/E BEEN MADE FdR ALL LABOR, M�RIALS.
9T. MACNtNERY, FIXTURES QR T40lS FURNtSHEd W1THtN iHE 128 DAYS IMMEDtATEtY Pi3ECEDINGi THE CtBSINQ DATE 1N
98. GONNEC�ION WITH CON5THUCf10tJ, ALTERATION OR REPAIR OF ANY STRUCTURE QN QR IMPRQYEMENT TO THE PROPEFiTY.
9�. SELLER WARAAt�iTS TNAT SELLER HAS NOT RECElVED ANY NURit:E FROM ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY AS'I�D VIOLATiON
fQR OF ANY LAW, ORDlNANCE OR EiEGUl.ATfON. !E iHE Pf20PEHIY iS SUBJ�4T TQ RESlHtCillf@ COVENANTS, SEItER WARRAN'ta
f01. THAT SELLER HAS NO? RECEIVED ANY NO�FCE FROM ANY PERSON OR AUTHORtTY AS iTJ A BREACH OF 7NE COVENANiS. ANY
2a2. NQ7{GES RECElVEQ BY SELl.ER WiLL BE PfiOYlDEQ 'f0 BUYER lMMEDtATElY.
t03 RlSK Of l�OSS. � thse Is any bss a dan►aye b�ae belween t�e dala hersof and the dala d ta any teason Ties var�n�
�o�a. nooa, earit,�,�xe or ea or c,oa, u,e �ic a to�s snat t� on � cneproppr � a��a a,�����" 'y da�►�a ne�e a,e d�. aas
i05. pixd�se Agreement st�aN be�.rome nuM ena vaa, � Buye�'a optiort, and e�r� nta�sy be telundea w suyer; 6ur9r ana seNef agrea a sign
10& car�cetfaiian ot Pundrase Agreemert#.
tQT. - ^�9-3t9E
40& ANIf CLAIM OR DEMAND !?F S�Z_ _B�
t49. TQ TFifi PHYSICAt CONDiTiOH O TtiE
11Q UMITATION CLAIMS OF FRAUD, MISREPF
11i. ARBITRATF4N [N /1CGORDl1NCE V{tiTti iHE
112 ANd THE MINNESO?A ASSOCIATION Of F
1f3 THE DATE lH WFiICH THE RECEVANT FAC7;
114. DISC01/ERED. THIS IS A SEPARATE YQUIt�
ti5. S1lRVtVE THE OEtiYF�tY OF THE DEEU Oi
11& TO AGAEE TC1 AABITNA7'E DQES NQC-APt
117. SYSTEM !S ONCY ENFBRC ALL i�
118 BY INRIALS BEI,�l{A/�AA ITRATlON IS BIN
ti9. CIViI. ��
12Q dlfHf£�1----�`aE�R(�i--
C�I_IIP.I l I+r�
BY
AG�IEED T0 AiiBil'RATE AS ACKNOVYLF.D{
ARE GENERA!!.Y WAIYIN(3 TtiE1R RlGNTS
121. qEFAIJLT. N Utle ts mar{aefable a� is axsecfed as �xwkled hereGr, erid Buy�sr defaults h airy d the��� � eppee�This
S?2. fhEs Ptxt�iase Agreerrrent and paymet�ts mads hetetxtidar may be retektied(� SeQer ertdpp�, as
'123. provksbn shaN not deptivs either FJtryer or SeNer ot !he right b t�ower darn9ges �x a brextt OF Sl�i.9 Ag�+Bertaent ot Ot tl19 tigtd af ajpe�C pertonrsance
124. of tfiis ptovkied tl�fs Pur�t�ase Agreetr�ent is not iertr�ied� �d Hxiher provided, as b specifa periomiar�e, euch adioit b a+rtxne�roed
125 rvithkl s� after such dgt�! of aclion arises. .
12fi TIME OF ESSENCE: Tkne b d' the essence fn tl�ls Plxcfiase A�reemerd.
i27. ENT IRE AGAEEMENT: 'ii�is Pu� A�ement, +arN alladted eod�bits end arry addenda, or � signed bY asid Eitiyec Ti�ls Ptxt�sse
129. Apreement�modtied or�ly M vvrkkig��signed bY���dher oYtit69tt or ota! eg�aentetNs bettiteen SOAer
t3a POSSESstoN: SeHer shaN deitver po�on d the property not taier man closing date after c�iosing,
13f. /4M kr6es'sst, hotneowner a�ott ck�.s. rer�ts, tuet dl, Yquid PeUtiteum � arid ai charges for dtY w�»4 c�tY ae�ne� sle�i� and ts�ural flas shalt
132 be baM�een tlte parUa4 8s pf Nnna • � SeMer eprees b rerriow� ALL
�� aE�ANO Att. PERSOtdAt PFiOFEEi2Y NOL i�i{X.130ED. F{EF�lN trom ihe ProP�1Y aS+ P� � .. . .
AOENCY DIBCWSUFiE: None . � 8TIPW.ATE$ Fi� QR SHE IS REPRESENTU�Q
a�•o� . , , • .. . .. . .
TNE �N TlilS 7RANSA�GT'tON.`THE USiiNQ AGENT OR BR4KEFi:&71PULATES NE OR.SHE iS
��esEa�mr�ca mE s� w�us �aewsacnara.,etiv�. t� s� u�tm�U.: euyer{sj �. _. _'seNec(s? .-. -
137. I, thQ owner �
138. autltortze the
19s. tt,e�market� �
140. �`-<' 2....�
�az.
144. OATE t}F PlEtAt.
14a
14G MN: YLPA-2 (3R2y
properry, �t tl�is a►d : � agrea b purdiase fhe propeny for the prke'and on the
b�K�tif�draw &s�propeity from ' iem�a �rd condiUorts set iorth ek�ova •• ., •
ahervvise in CITY OF MII�ID(7�'A�iiE�GIH15' :` ..
. ��r �' . •. . .
ean ransan M +�• r , •� . ' . �
�'n�� �� ns an c+�+w rmw r,r,.r : � � . t�
-t-1----- � .�l�'�''� . . .
erran w� �,�+ . , c�f
_ ' <. � , . . . .
or y erran e�+�i ►,�»► i
�FJTANt� &8!l.tN{i N3Et�T
THIS IS A LEtiALLY BINDINQ CONTAAGT Bfi1WEEN BUYER3 AND SELIERS. �.
iF YOtl dESIRE LEC3At OR 7AX ADVK�, CONSI1tT AN APPFiO?RlATE PROFESSIONAL.
• 4
.......::�._.:.... �.�...�,�:�..-°--- _.
!� ..�'::
r�
r
�
X� `
,.,�
�
.�,f/I Form Na. IBIT -1;(R.v. atsxl MWx�Oav!` LeBJ F«ma
� � �
� � .
VACANT l.AND PURCWASE AGREEMENT
Thia ronm ep�,rored cy u�e W%�xiesom Assadatbn a
EiEAWAS� Mlrnesda Assodelbn d REAWHS°
�'� Nr �v•�+o «� a�«�e a u,� to�,,.
t. pate b r 18 � 1944.
z��a �
3.RECElvEDOF Cit o€ Mendota Hei hts ' "
4, � � � pne Hundred and no 100 — — • poq� {� �� "0(3•. 00 ' • }
a by+ a{ECic�s� es eame�r n,oney w be aepo�oea upon eixea+�ce a purt�e A�eement by i1 parUes, on or betae the nexc
s business aayr aftcr a«xptar�ca, in a trerst aaro�,nt a�SUry� broker aue tn be �etumea co�uye� t� Purchaae a{reemetst is rai.ccepted br
7. Seiior. Said samast ma�ey is part payrtnent br the puchase cf the property bc�tsd at''�PIN 27-57Q00-02Q-02
a i
: i, i,FS.T.[�ii
�
Qxnty of gajcota , St� at h�r�o�,
����'fiD P�PettSS � e�y; owtted ty r end k7cai�d qt said ptopHttyc �! q2�Idett bt#� Ptar�b, tf�1/aS and irea� and at�o tltw ioMk�NM1Q
13 peRsonat property: � None . � � ' '
ia. aA d whkh property SeNer I� �Is day apreerl b aell b Eluyer fa tlia a�m cf; Twentx—nine Thousa�}d .;On� • .
t� Hundred $ Fiftv and no j.,'LQ �,}
76 whbh Buyer agreas b pay h tl�e toAc7wtr�g rt�: � maiey aF S 1Q0. 00 ����t��UO' .�
n��,�� December 1 1994 �,���,����� 0
18 by fnandrg h e000rdanoe with the at�ed �g addar�d�sx
1� AssumPtlon Cotrttact tor Oeed Cunve�,ntf� a1 PuccFiase MoneY M6ot�0Uasr
� • .
20t SPECIAl. tit}DtTtDK�i�ES: Thi$ Pu�d�e l�reecnent Es subJec� b the fotfa�r+i� car��rii'%$ and � the ioAovufrl� 'c.ac�irigarrcies ct:eclaad betaN�
21. caru'at be satisfied ar wai�ed� in bY euyer bY --No}�E= , 19.__, riis Puolt�e A�eets�errt attal be�onte tx�N
22 arrd wid sttd ai eartle�t mOney� retuttcied b the &ry6[ Buyets erld S�llers Npre9 b sipn 8 C9noeAetlon d�Ie Pud�e Apreertlert.
23 {Set2a app�oprtate optiot�s e�hl
24� Q(� BtJYE�� � shal provkla a cert�Ee d�r +ot the qnpetty, at BUY �! � eaq�et�ses, noC !s� �an . .
�1. � � ' . .
� ��s � a �r►�� � a� � a� �a � g suir �r s�� �r�.., :' �
{ • ..
� �s � # �r� � t� �+ � ata„s ac euv �i s�� �se.
� � - .
Buyer obtairdng apprcxai a atyrbwr,ship i�x reaor�ing or u�se pem�ls et euYER�� s,,,�ELLER eoq�,sa � . . .
s
8uyer obmkr�p ai suvER� �f�LER � pe�atffiion i�sts rvhtcn are aocep�bte a suyec
Bi,lj� 17bF3�ii�t10 8l BI3YEf�_, [��I.L�.R � 80�1 1B5b 1AIf1�}1 �ffiff�091�$1110 P(GPB11y ITt� bB kI1p1[MBd WAtM�111� �i801S�(191y �
31. rnettsods cr cost. ' ` °' . � � .
32 0(� suyer o�mM�inc ,apprwa+ a c�dr�p piaru ar�dar �ed�aoro In �o�danoe ,kkn ,any �eo«riea �Nv�a�, oa�,m ma ep�v�l a
�i ihe a�tedual oct�d oorm�Miee. � , • ' '
34. C] {h} {ftt#EF� ;
� � t
3e seaer's �pen*�es ior �,a9e � �f shaA nat �a;eed S -None . '
3T. ^aeler' $tarlts peRft�ssbit d aocese b tlie prop�c�ty ior testkg and �nn3ylnp pupoeea �
36 PLEASE NOTE: &ry�ef Infl�/ klCul' ed�ti0nal cttarpas ATip�ovGg tlt6 ilchirSl'g bllt Ix,t Iki1N9d bC Fiouk�p etldbr �wroB�.R �+ �
3� a�ts r�r s�ner ea:ess, � ec�, wat�r eoca�, paric��ian. roed ao�s, u�iry oamec�un and came�irg fees, axb aag
A0. � planikig diarges_
41. To tlte besc oF tlte SeAet"s laawleclge there ere no F�.iol�s wa�s„ abandoned w6Ms, or uncierp�nd abr+�e t�rJe, eoar�pt 8s f�etefn nofecL
42 SPECWL WARRANTIES: �.aetlet �prop9rty cl�ait�ec! Mt Ws Pud�ase A�teernent oats�b of
43 2£�, 50A �����FE�'"'" is �� I.u�iastr-�a� _.
a4. Seder vvarranls it� the pro�ty Is ��e cfesigt�ted �tUO y�ar Aaod Piaki erea. .;: ..
i
45� SeGer'warta�rXs tF� a,e Prope+ty D(�� rlacF� p�tenenttal m�c tr�rnert {Ge�. c�t�aen•Aaes, elcj..., .,,
46 Attached are ather adder�da whic;h am� rtiede a part af Utits P'tr�t�sse A�eemer�t. (Enier paps or PaQes an Wie, 2} . ' .
a7. DEEDnNAKKETABt.E TiTLE: tJpon Pedatnanoa 6Y SuSre� SeNer shall de�rrer s ..�'rg.neraT V�rtarttY � l�
4&hbY�W�+Y�g���fa: • . .. . .
bQ tu��te�re��Pro�v�ax,' (C1 R���v�on�d eny mk�ral rf�hb�� d. MY�r�o�.�(L� +ar�d �ease t b� � i�
61. wNh �ocl�InC kr�prov�emer�r (Ei Rlpt�l of Mnanb ns lodouv�l(txtle�et �pedAed� �at eubJer� b lenmdeek
52 �
53� (Fj �tltess {Mtist be spaci(ieC! kt vuritlrtg): � � -
54. TITLE & EXAMINA710N: f.r,eAer w�t�Yt a teasa�abla Uttte ffiI�r aocepterbe af �!s . �en4 tuts�sti �att el�reid of� titls� _or n �egk,,i�ed
fr�'a propeity ��trad� certi8ed b daie b i�de pro�� esaud�es obreif�g banlw�qdes, siab �fiedatal and �d �evaa arid �p
5fi as��essrttec� 8uyer at�M be aMov4ed 10 busk►ess days a11er secdipt o[ ah�ad ior d title acz! ot�jectiorx� vrl�di
57. s�I be msde in vrtidr�p or deert�! wr�red. � eny �hjedbn ts so mede�, SeNer eheA have 10 bt� days kan d�a wri�in title
58. abjed3ais b t�otity 8tty�er d SeOer"s krist�lott b mala3 title metiaetabie wNHrt 120 clays $vm SeNei'a d suctt w�iqett ObJectlon. t( ttdk;e ts
59i gi�e�,, pa�nnenis nereurxier req�irea shar be Poslponea pe�xtng oa,+sdion a utle� buc upon coRe�^�on a�end within il1 aays �r wrttien no8oe
1 w Buyer the shaN perlu�m tl�is P� Agreemei�t aa�rtir�g to ics fem�s. � rw a�ach notloe is �i+�en a it ratice is giwen but t�te fs cat
cartec�ed w'�tlrt�e ptovirled � tl�fs Pu�hase shal be nul and ed optiori af &ryvr; r►eUtierp� shaA be iable fa' dantages
.,22. hereunde�' b flta atlter and e�rt�t tr�oney afiaN be ��r� Buy�r; FSuyer and�Se�er ag� b slgs +�artc�ion� d P� Buyer
63 b aoc�t an anrt�ei's 6tlep�y fn the tuN ernax�t d tl►e purdiass price Yt Cieu d an ebs�tr�+ct d tide � thep b b a mastier
64 a�i� ar M no s6sUa�t d•titlo ts h�S�s p�on ar oorkrd � �yer is b �ecetve such po6cy tE} the titls �r�n�ir� perbd st�1 camc�erxe
65t�pon &rya�'s reoeipt d a axtent title Y�r� � and (2�8 SeAe�r sheN pay tlie enlire pterTifun tor �uch poGc.y Y r10 lender's 6c� ts
6ft o 6 t� d. �td aiy the addNonai oost af ob�ing a si�nulmctea.ssly issued oMtet's poR�y � a let�dei's pok.y is a6t�ited (Buyer shei pay it�e p� m i u m
67. %r tlte (endei's po6c,y}. �
68, Selfer' and Buy+x ki1Ual: .'�ietier C1ate � Btryer '- Dees
����� ' � .. .
I ' ' ' � •
r,
r,•
r'�
,J
�
, rz.x� :
::r: .
,...t. `"
.-.: �4
t 7.':�
� >;
z;
.:tz:.
.�:s::�:
:'�,,,.
�.y.l:
.�:
::s
_:r;
�':i'
:t;:
.'-�'
• ",
�
♦'� ' R
�. t-
i�ll) Form No.1617 -2 tn�,,. srozt Mw�.D..0 �a Fo�,
• ' '' VACANT LANp PURCHASE /�C$F�F�EMEN7
. 7p; p� October 28
71. Page 2 of ;.• P'ages
72. REAL ESTATE TAXES shall be paid as tollows: • �• . '.
73 eu�rer shaN pa�; aroraied from day oi c�t 12tha a none . tea! esfafe � dste and papabEe in ihp yesr 19 94 -
74. Seller shali paY, prorated to daV of clos�in , 12 e none real estate fa�s due and payable ki the y+aar•19 94 -
7�. tn ihe evenf the t�osing date ts Changed, the es paid sh2ll, If Prorafed, be e�t�sted b the tiew dos2ng'date. Setler waRants
76 tawas due artd ¢ayabte in the year 19 �%.S_ w➢I be NON-HOMESf£AD da�ific�on. Seder agrees to paY �Y'� e# � S
T/. 9wvatd the narlwmeste�ud portbn af the reaJ estate ta�aes. Buyer agrees b PaY enY remak�k�9 bal�nce o( nonfwmestead ta�oes whan they br�uome
7a di,e and payabla Nefther seaer nor aeer�t{s) meke a„y re�xesentatlon cor�cernN�g u�e amour,t a subsequent �eal es�te m�s.
79. SPECIAt ASSFSSMENTS shaM be paid as iot(aM3:
60. BUYER AND SELLER SHALL PRORATE AS OF THE DA7E OF CLOSIN SELLER SHAL4 PAY 4N DATE.OF CLOSIN
w°'.w .,,,_- �
92 B�UY�ER SHAI.l.�U�wEJ.�LER-� � AY Asd�e a��e �alFer#�'sp�' al � �e� ldate d dosing.
rom s e���as a�e '
&i BUYER SNALL ASSUME "SELIER SHALL PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT O s�ssm�enb per�fr�p es o( the�dffis p( dosinp {or
84. Imprqvemer�s tF�at have been �' ng `�mrthqtit(es, (Seryers ptavision (qr payment
a5 escrtxu a€ riw {2} times !he estirrsaisd arnart d the �es� a less as iet�ied k�Y Bu}t3r`s lendec} Bt;YER SFiAlI. P!A SHA1.G PA
s& w, daxe a aasing any det�med rea� es�e rexes p,�, c�reen acres, eca� or s�ec�ai assessrnerxs payme�,c a wnicr, �"'reyu�rea es a resun or
e'/. u,e obsing ot this sa�e. Buyer st�aM a� �eal estate tr�ces due and payat�le in u,e year ng cbsing and u,ereaft&er and erry unpatd specta!
86. aa,esstnents payable tlteretivtth and� tl�ieteafter, the paytt�ettt of whictt is not oth�tyvfsek�p�r�e�lded. . .
89. ACCEPTANCE: Suyer u�nderstands and &grees tl�at this Pu�chase Agr�emeM IS subject b acceptance by Sedef h wriHl�g. Agents are not NaWe
9Q or responsible kx arry Cuven MYiigations or wartanties made M this purchaseqpr� nt, ex�i the egeMs ere Itable io retum or aGCourtit
91. tor the eama5t monsy. The�dslnrp�r ot aM papers and monfes shaM be made a! hi e�listing 6roker's otittxi.
821NSPECitQN: Buyer has the right 6o inspect PropeAY Prio�' fa cbs(ng.
93 GENERAL WAF�AANTIES: SELLER WAflRAN15 TNAT li�E BU(L.DING$r IF ANYr ARE ENIIRII.Y WRHIN THE BOUNDIARY 1JI�ES OF THE
84. PROPERTY. SELtER WARRANTS TNAT THERE IS A RtGHT OF ACCESS TD THE PROPERiY FROM A PUBL[C RIGHT {}F WAY, 7HESE
95 WARFiAF1TfES SHALL SURVtVE TNE LiQNERY OF THE DEED OR CONTRACf �OR DfEO. � -
9fi SELLER WARFIANTS 7HAT PRIOR'(D THE CWSIN(i DATE PAYMENT IN FULI. WILL HAVE BEEN MADE FOfi ALL LABOfl, MATERIALS,
97. MACHlNERY, FlXTURES OR Tq4LS FURNISHED WRHIN THE i2Q DAYS tMMED1ATEl.Y PRECEDIN{3 THE CtASiNG DA'TE IN
98 COFINECFlON WiTH tX}NSTRUCTIOi�i, ALTERATtON OR REPAtR OF AtSY STRtlC�tlFtE dH OR IMPRdYEMENT l�D TNE PROFEHiY.
'99. SELLER WARRAN75 THAT SE4LER HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY Nf�l'ICE FROM ANY GOVERNMENTA4 AUTHORITY AS 71D VIOLAI'ION
100. OF ANY LAW, ORDINANCE OR REGULATION. IF 7HE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT 7n RESTRICTIVE COiIF.t�WNTS, SELLER WARRANTS
'40t. THAT SELIER HAS Nt7T RECEiYED ANY �CE FROM ANY PERSON OR AUTHQRITY AS TO A BF�EACH OF TNE CQVENAHIS. ANY
i02 NOT'ICES RECEiVED 8Y SEItER WILI. BE PROVtDED TO BUYER tMMEDtATEtY. • �
103. RISK OF LOSS: U tliert� ts arry bs3 or dart�ye b 11te qperty beNueen Ut9 date FiereoC and th9 d�te d fnq, for any 2asat ng fi� �r�dal�ism,
1aa. ttooa> �+3rihquaEse or ed a God, tt,e rislc a toss st,�altt be� on Sertec u the �xoperiy i� y�,� «ss,�ix�u�it3siy dart�aged betors� tl� c�shg t�e, th#s
i05. Pun�ase Agnsemsrt shaA becane nui and wid et Buye�e apkion, ar�d earna�t maieya����hali be tetuxied b 8uyer; 8uyret' atid Seder agtee b sign
tUH cancetlalfon of Pur�hase Agreernent.
'i0d ANY CCAiM 4R DEMAND OF 3 �L�{;
iU9.1�0 ?HE PtiYStCAt CONDITIOEN O�
11Q LIMIiAT10N (:LAIMS QF FRAUp, MIS
111. AR811'FiA7lON IN At;CQRDANCE WITH
'112. AND THE M1NFfESOTA ASS4ClATEOt�t
113 THE DATE iN WHtCH iHE RELEVANT i
114. DISCOVERED. THIS IS A SEPARATE V
115 SURVlYE THE OEUYERY OF THE DEE
11fi'i0 AGREE TO ARB1TFiATE DOE�p[�F
ii7. SY$TEM iS ONLY ENFf,?9CE�SL'� IF A
116 BY (NITIAIS_BEl:OW.'�ARBITRATION �"
.��
Il _.� ►
L PARTIES AND BROKERS/AGENTS HAVE
BINDINQ AND PARTIqPANT3, THEREBY,
� �
.�• •
• L •
TO
�
121. DEFAULT B UNo is martastable or (s oareded aa provide�d hereki� ard Buyer de{aulb in 8nY af iheagreen da herekl� SeYer may �
122 Usls F'txChase Ngtesment attd paytner�fs rrsa�de het�xxler may be tetalried#�y Seqer sttd 8s U�elr �tes�edive kfEeta� ay ap¢eac Thts
123 pravisiori sha� nat deprf�re either Buyer ar SeNer of tha right b recasr darnages fiot e�'sacit af�Agreemer�t ar ##ye right at ary��iC�c Perbnt�u►ce
124. of tl�is Agreertte�lt, ptovk�ad this Ptur�se Agreetnent Is not terrr�fnaEed� and firU�er plovided, as b speCit'�c petfa111Earxe, sudl ed3oit IS cartrl�rlced
12a withkl sbt motXtrs a(ter 8uch righR of aCtfon atises. t ,
12fx TINtE dF ESSENCE: Time is of the essetxe in tl�is Purctiase Ag�eemetN.
127. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: TFds Pur�ase ABreernenf, arry ettadt�d md�IMb end arry t�ddenda ar amendmenb'signAd bY tliep�, shaM oor�titttte
128. ihe er�e Agreernent b�tu�en Seqar and Buy�aS arx! super�edes ofhee vvr�ten or oral &greetne�ts behueen SeMer arid Buyec�'Tftis Pix�chase
129. Agresrrret# c�r► tae modified onty in ws�g signed by SeAer arxi�yec .
130. POSSESSION: Seiler shaA delhrer p�lon of the properly nd lai� than c 1 o s ing da t e � ��g,
131. Ap interest, hotrieom►er 6�ion dues, rer�i, (uel dl, Nquid P���► 9� ����9� ��Y �e5 �Y sev�a� elecUickY, etx! neihMal yes shaA
f32 bep�r�ted betvwen the pait3es a� at Nane . • ' SeUer a�ses to romore ALL
133. C�E:6AiS AND ALL PERSOt�AI. PROPEfiTY NOT INCLUDED, HEREIN from ih9 ProP�Y bY P� � '' •,
�. .
AtiENCY D18GlASURE: N�,tP �� � • 8TtPUl.ATE$ NE OR.8HE fS REPi#ESEi�1Tti
. . �•, , .. .
THE IN 7HIS TRANSACrION. THE LISTINCi AGENT OH 6ROKER �7'IPULATES NE�Ofi $NE
��Es�r�a mE s� � �s �tRausa+cnor�..etir� e s�a tr��r�a�.: Buy�r{aj � . � � ..: ,:�exer{s} `,� � : . �
13.9. the markst, un ��r � � kt �
�K� � �pnoperiy ham .,
rKdse
iaa �'�'��d��.��. r�+ � �P' - 9 �
cswr.�a�+..� on . erron ;
14i. M '
� aMea Martwe)�! ptvkN
14 -�-ra�-x//� �%2�_._-- •�, _ :�'_ ydG �
�w.sa�o�at�y 'I'� ron . ,
t43 . � "
fswr's P�+ed ►tenx) p,y,� '
•� agree b purt�iase u,e p�nperty br ths price•end�on the �
U�
�����.����': ^ti= � '., ' ' .
�fe�Y�r'� _ :a^. ry. _,.-_:., '
'Pd`+�d ) . .�', y�a.;.'• .�.,: .PArwl
' s . . . '-Y," NrH
. '(aMr'+t�r+�a ' . ,r },:•.•....• stm.)
144. DATE l?F FlNAL ACCEPGWCE , �SE1tJNC; M3ENT � . , . . . .�
145. ' TNtS tS A I.Ei3AtLY 8lhtDtNQ COHii3ACT sETWEEN 8ttY6R3 AND 3Eil.ERS: � �:.. ,. ., .
14& MN: V4PA-2 (�2) {F YOU DESIRE LEGAL dR TAX�ADVICE, CONSULT•AN APPRdPRIATE PFtpFESSlpNAL. .�:. .. s . .
. �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
1 �! �
� Octoher 27, 199�
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Ad '
FROM: 7ames E. Danielson, Public Works D' r
SUB�,TECT: Implementing GIS at Mendota Heights
�
B�iCBGROUND•
l �
Mendota Heights along with the rest of the communities in Dakota County �
participated with the County in obtaining new aeriai topography. Dakota County b
information as a springboard for developing a Geographic Information System (GI,
GIS, along with many other capabilities, computerizes all the land da.ta within the 1
Several of �the local communities have also developed their own GIS capabilities wi
information. Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban (DSLn has the compatible GIS capabilit
until now, ;we have used them along with imposing upon the County for any neede�
information. DSU used it for their Super Block study and is now using it for their
Highway 55 Corridor Study.
;
;
The uses for GIS are a great improvement to other methods, and some of th
City could �use it are; obtaining and easily updating all our planning maps, tracking
enforcement activities, all planning activities and quick access to all properiy infon
i
DISCUSSION•
�
The Dakota County Economic Development Partnership is currently seekin�
grant from'the Minnesota Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation to fun�
up costs for developing a county wide GIS data. base. They are currently working �
communities to support their request and to participate on a locai level. Participati�
local level would require the following:
1.
2.
Purchase the needed computer hardware and software =$8,000
Assign one staff person (Guy Kullander?) to assist them in
files into electronic data files. Approximately 1 month.
� used that
. This
h this
, and up
GIS
areas the
an $100K
the start
�ith all the
nona
our local
3. Assist in funding start up costs over next three years =$3,100 per year X 3
years = $9,300 �
RECOMMENDATION•
It would be a quantum leap forward for Mendota Heights' recordkeeping abilities and
would greafly expedite and improve our retrieval process for planni.ng, engineering, and
administration purposes. I recommend that Mendota Heights agree to support the Dakota
County Economic Development Partaership in their grant application and then also agree to
parkicipate in the conversion of Mendota Heights' information to being computerized should
they be successful in obtaining their grant. I recommend that the needed $17,300+ be funded
out of Tax Increment Financing ('TTF) as the TIF district does cover the entire City and having
this data computerized will allow the Ciry to produce quick, easy, high quality maps and
information that can be used to encourage development and enable staff to study proposals that
are offered.
ACTION REOUIRED•
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion
authorizing the City Administrator to sign the Grant application on behalf of Mendota Heights
when it is ciiculated next week.
COUNTY
,conomic Development Partnership
October 25, 1994
I
MEMORANDUM �
�`
To: Paitnership GiS Project Advisors
Fram: Scott Beclanan
RE: GIS Project Maintenance Cost Adjustments
We have rerdesigned the 1996-1998 mai.ntenance cost schedule for rnu GIS Pro
changes do not increase the ongoiug maintenance cost for any community. i
decrease the ongoing costs for eight communities. All other elements of the pmjec
unchanged.
1
As part of the Mianesota Boazd of Governraent Innovation and Coogeration Ser
Grant Pmgram, communities need to show a commitment for ongoing program r
Ftom earlier discussions, we decided to show a commitment of three years beyond
gia.nt start up period. To �his point we have proposed a consisient $ 7,000 a y
community. Ttris was to cover GIS basemap updating and reference map updatin
It has bee� bzought to our attentian that the annuai $ 7,QU0 per city cost is not eq�
the par�el{basemap pracessing for large cities involves significantly more work th�
for the smaller cities. Based on this i.nput, we bave refigured the needs for years
four and now offer a cost tiering stnicture for the program. Following are the sF
l
A. Three �'Iiers of Cities
I. Tier One - Large Communities (Eagan, Burnsville, Apple V�lley, Lakevil;
of, 14,Ob8 hwseholds. In total these eommunities account for 61.6 pe
households in all 11 communities.
1
;
2. Tiar Twa - Moderate Sized Cammunities (West St. Paul, South St. Paul,
Heights, Hastings) - Aveiage of 6,610 households. Accouats for 28.9 pE
hous�holds ia all 11 communiti.es.
3. T'�er Three - Smaller Communities (Mendota Heights, Rosemount, and F�
Aveiage of 2,891 households. Accwnts far 9.5 percent of the househo]
communities.
Achieving Community Potential Through Cooperatiive
iScott Beckman Director
� L�akc>ta Covnty l:conomic Development Partnership
�0iz0'd 90L6 �zb zT9 1NflOW3S0�1 �l3
�. These
.e chan�g,�s
design are
:e Sharing
�intenance.
�e one yeax
�r cost per
table since
� is needed
ro through
-Average
nt of the
Gro've
of the
in a11 � 1�
se:si� b�si-��-i�n
£0'd �d101 ' '
B. Revised Annual Maintenance Cosis and Services
1. GIS Basemap Updating
2. Reference Map Updatin
ti
3. Map Printing
4. Possible Rea1 Estate
Data Updates
C. Cost Structure Assumptions
$ 3,90�0
(4) $ 1,600 {4)
(4) $ 480 (4)
$ 1,000
$ 1,920
$ 1,600
$ 480
$ �sa
$ 920
(4) $ 1,200
(4) $ 480
� soo
1. Only those costs tbat will allow each community to maintai.n its GIS capabilities
established during the first year of the program.
2. One annual GIS basemap update if converting from the full parcel file fmm the Counry.
1�ro annual updates if the County can pmvide an "update only" f�le.
3. In addition ta parcel.s, all city defined geagraphic layers (e.g., zoni.ng, landuse,
planning, finance districts) will be updated as will otl�r regional planning layers (e.g.,
TAZ's, MUSA lines)
4. County Assessors data and the private real estaie data base will be updated quarterly (if
available). '
5. No charge far Counry updated parcels and County Assessor's Office data. The cost of
the private real estate data is estimated at $ 8,500 -�
6. Arc View 2 data�iies wil� be updated for all citi.es as updated geagraphic and attribute
data become available. No new Arc View applications are included in the cost.
7. No training is assumed in these costs.
Addirional needs beyond these maintenance items (i.e., maps, applications, training) will
be available for cities, as requested, at standard consulting fees from Insight Mapping
& Demographics, J.nc. . Cities are not required to use any of these supplemental semrices.
PIease call me if you have any questions.
�0i�0'd 90L6 �Zb Zi9 1Nf10W3S0�1 �.I� �A:ct b��t-c�-i�n
, ;
����
;conomic Development Partnership
ISSLTES BRIEF AND DISCUSSION GUIDE
DAKOTA COUNTY MULTI-COMMUNTI`Y GIS PR07ECT
Praject Description
Ten cities in Dakata County are seeking a grant from the Minnesota Board of Govern�
and Cooperation to fund the start-up costs for developing cooperative GIS data base
training r'esources. If funded, ihe project would give our commanity an iII-house ability
quaiity; �Iarge format coior reference maps, (such as zoning maps, comprehensi
commerciallindustrial parce! inventory mags, redevelopment or financing district ma�
demographic prafiles of select areas in our community), We wouid atso gain imp�
mappabl � Qarcel level Cax data for use in plannitng and development analyses and activit
Key Issue
Shouid ttie Ciry participate in the appiication for these grant fun.ds?
�
Questions €ar Discussian
1. Does the City want ta use GIS to support its planning, zoning, economic develapm
efforts?
2. D� es tlle City have or is it wiliing to purchase ttte foliowing hardware aud softwa�
system (Prices estimated in parentheses)?
�$6 computer with 12 MG RAM? with I'7" coior monitor ($4,500}
Additional hardware upgrades ($2,5(}q)
Arcview 2 saftware package � ($1,000}
3
4.
5
�
?,
�
�
It is estimated that one assigned staff person, {such as an assaciate planner
technician), will need to provide up to one manth's time in 1995 to assist Insig
Demographics to cQnvert local zoning information into electronic data files. Will
this assistance?
i
,
After the one year start-up period, there will be an annual cost of approximat�
participating City to update the data and mapping files. This will rec}uire approxim
of �staff time per year to accamplish the updates. Will the City cammit ta
resources to the project for a period of three years?
To produce high quality maps requires a color printer which some communities d
have. This project assumes that a warkabie program ta produce maps on such a pri
be {provided. Does this plan meet with your approval?
i
GI5 data awnership rights and responsibilities have not been delineated.. What la
or property information wautd we not want to share with other project particig
con.cerns in this area be mitigated. by a cooperative data agreement specify terms
access anc! use?
Do� yau a�ticipate a need for the staff trazniug component included in the project
will the proposed 2 day seminar and 24 hours of individualized support be suffic:
Achieving Community Patential Through Gooperative Actio�
Scott Beckman Director
Dakata Caunfy Economic Development Partrzership
1300145`° Street 1Zosemount, MN 55068 (612) 423-$291 FAX (612) 423-9706
eut Innovation
rnapping, and
� prodace high
e plan maps,
�, and detaileti
►ved access to
and related
to supgort the
r engineering
Mapping and
; City provide
$ 7,i100 per
y two weeks
vidin� these
not currently
�r offsite wili
use, zoning,
s? Cau our
information
If so,
�
Integration And Sharing Of Geographic Information In Support Of Cooperative
Planning And Marketing Activities By Dakota County Communities
An Eleven Community Proposal To The Minnesota BoarrJ Of Govemment
Innovation And Cooperation Service Sharing Grant Pragram
A. Proposed Project
This project addresses a critical municipal problem; the efficient and effective use of
geographically-based infoRnation for planning and economic development marketing.
Integration is achieved using emerging geographic infoRnation system (GIS) technology
and a cooperative regional program that supports the cost efficient development and
use of this technology.
Project Applicants.
This proposal is an outgrowth of more than a year's planning by Dakota County
municipalities. The communities supporting this proposal include Apple Valley,
Bumsville, Eagan, Farmington, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, South St -
Paul, and West St Paul. Collectively, these communities encompass a population
base of more than a quarter million people. This group of communities is surprisingly
diverse. Some of these communities are large and others are small. Some are
urbanized while others are rural. And some are fully developed while others are
anticipating significant future growth. They share a common interest, however, in using
the rapidly developing Geographic Information System technology to their mutual
benefit
The catalyst far this effort is the Dakota County Economic Development Partnership.
The Partnership was created by the Dakota County Private Industry Council in May of
1991 and includes representatives of private business, education, county, city and
township govemments and agencies, non-profit organizations, and citizens interested
in creating a healthy, expanding economy in Dakota County. In framing up the mission
of the Partnership, a market study and needs assessment were undertaken in July of
1992. One of the needs identified as high priority was the development of an
integrated Geographic Information System (GIS) resource for regional planning and the
marketing of Dakota County. In mid-1993, the Partnership convened a committee of
community and economic development directors which foRnulated this plan for an
integrated county GIS program offering significant local and regional planning and
marfceting capabilities.
Other additional participating organizations include: Dakota Electric Association
(participating as a member of the Partnership), Dakota County Survey And Land
Information Office (source for current and updated GIS parcel digital map data), and
Insight Mapping & Demographics, Inc. (contracting GIS consulting firm).
� , . :
The p�oject incorporates a number of objectives:
1. To establish a framework for organizing and applying Geographic Info
System (GIS) capabilities for the mutual benefit of eleven Dakota Cou
municipalities.
2. To produce innovative and cost saving GIS maps and software applic�
support cooperative community planning and economic development
at both the regional and local levels.
3. To provide training and follow up support to ensure productive use of 1
I applications by all participating communities and organizations.
4. To establish procedures for ongoing GIS maintenance and application
I development
5. To produce a model for regional cooperative use of GIS that can be re
� in other settings within Minnesota and across the nation.
GIS is °a computer age tool for organizing, displaying and analyzing geographic
referericed data. GIS creates dynamic links between infoRnation (e.g., propert�
' data, census data, natural resource data, and other data) and features on a m�
land parcel boundaries, planning district boundaries, and other physical and po
features). This connection permits users to create timely, concise, and powerf�
information displays with an astounding variety of practical uses. For example,
or computer display can be produced showing individual parcels, soil drainage
characteristics, and proposed zoning changes. Or a GIS user can display "all o
city's land parcels over 2.4 acres, valued at less than $30,000 per acre, zoned �
Business." It is estimated by the Urban and Regional InfoRnation Systems Ass�
(URISA) that more than 80 percent of all municipal and county data is geograpr
based �and will eventually be tied into G1S data structures.
Planning and development departments are information dependent City Plann
make constant use of property and zoning infoRnation. Efforts to maricet availa
commercial and industrial property also requires access to effective reference n
and property inventory and tax data. Unfortunately, the combination of huge vc
of potential data and complex data systems have forced planning and developn
. departments to "make do" with outdated and inefficient information and mappin
� resources. It is not uncommon for city staff to rely on black and white zoning m
several years out of date. The lack of good infoRnation tools is compounded wl
see that these are also the resources that City Council and Planning Commissic
forced ,to use. The ongoing cost of not having current and effective infoRnation
can noi be overstated.
It is not surprising then that many Minnesota communities and regional organiz<
have been waiting with anticipation for GIS. While GIS has unquestioned planr
marketing applications, the path to its development is difficult Choices are mar
� eqwpment, software, and data costs are high. With few models of a working GI
place and even fewer examples of effective GIS planning and marketing progra
communities and regional organizations are struggling to find a workable and
affordable approach to meeting their growing GIS needs.
2
that
GIS
tax
� (e.g.,
map
the
we
are
g and
and
is
Dakota County has invested five years and miliions of doilars in the development of a
county-wide GIS parcel basemap, and now has one of the first digital property
basemaps in the state. Wth limited county GIS funding available, however, the County
has chosen to focus its ongoing resources on its critical basemap maintenance
responsibilities rathe� than dilute its resources by supporting municipal GIS
development and application. This is expected to be the case in most, if not all,
Minnesota counties.
Dakota County aties, like most othe� Minnesota cities, are facing two altematives.
Cities will either find start up costs prohibitive and will be left out of the GIS picture� or
they will build their own data structures and applications without the advantage of
experience or the benefits of economies of scale. In ou� view, both altematives are
unacceptable.
Project applicants estimate that without an integrated option, communities will need to
spend at least $10,000 to even begin to use GIS and will not develop any of the critical
skills, applications and reference maps of critical importance to planning and
development efforts. To achieve just the lacal capabilities required, communities will
experience $30,000 a year in GIS related expenditures. Given cuRent budget
limitations, this option is unrealistic.
The proposed project defines a new altemative, an altemative that opens up GIS
development to all communities, provides for shared cost efficiencies, and establishes
the necessary framework for the shared networking of community information. The
grant from the Minnesota Board of Govemment Innovation and Cooperation will be
used to meet a portion of the start up costs for an integrated GIS program serving�the
local and regional planning and development interests of all communities in Dakota
County. To our knowledge there is no comparable program undenivay anywhere in the
Minnesota.
B. Benefit
Dakota County communities recognize that demographic and economic change affects
interdependent communities regardless of their boundaries. These communities have
come togethe� with a common interest in managing such change rather than being
managed by it Wth full implementation, all 11 applicant communities will establish a
sustainable GIS capability supporting local and regional planning and economic
development marfceting. A number of important benefits a�e anticipated.
1. All apalicant communities will have the capabilitv to access and use infoRnation
more effectivelv. Staff and elected officials can become better informed and
can apply infoRnation and maps more effectively in support of public
decisionmaking on planning and development issues. It is anticipated that
significant cost savings wi0 be achieved as long, drawn out debaies - that often
occur when accurate information is not available - are reduced.
In addition, information access will not be limited to a single community. By
creating a consistent data structure, region based maps and information will be
available to provide a important context for local planning and decision making.
3
- 2.
3.
4.
`As one of Minnesota's fastest growing counties� Dakota County is an
�appropriate place to demonstrate how a repiicable, integrated GIS syste
facilitates the process of creating and sharing useful information across
boundaries, analyzing regional managed growth issues, supporting pub
�discussion, and facilitating policy making.
'on-demand analvsis capabilities of value to business and economic
'development activities. For example, a firm considering a development site
'might be concemed about attracting qualified labor. The integrated GIS, as
�proposed, will not only list the number of employees that live in the area, but will
�show the neighborhoods where they live. These infoRnation sharing cap�abili6e:
are critical in helping business prospects judge the development potential of
available sites and reduce the risks and community costs associated with
iuninformed Iocation decisions.
iDakota County cities are planning to use the GIS information management
�capabdity as part of a unified effort to market Dakota County as a single
�economic entity rather than marketing each of the eleven communities
individually. This will results in additional spin-off costs savings from this .
�project It will also provide an important model of an innovative, coopera 've
iservice program that is applicable statewide. I
'efforts. Wth the creation of new GIS applications� local and regional analyses
that would normally take many days or weeks to complete will be availab�e in a
matter of minutes or ho�rs. In addition, this program will produce a senes of
�important �egional tools� inGuding five detailed, regional reference maps that
�show the location of developed commercial and industrial property, vacant
'property zoned for commerciai and industrial development, current regional
;traffic pattems� and population and labor force demographics. �
'si4nificant cost savinqs over individuallv developed svstems. If GIS prog
�were to develop individually and were only later integrated, development
�would easily exceed $30,000 per city or $330,000 for all 11 applicant
communities. With no standards in data structure, the later integration w
ivery likely cost another $350,000 or mo�e. Total costs could well exceed
I$680,000.
�By taking a coordinated approach at project startup, we are looking at a
�implementation cost of approximately $225,000 with no later conversion
associated'with establishing regional integration. The cost are in the
�neighborhood of $450,000 and do not begin to address the other efficier
'and cost savings identified eariier. i� ,
� _,., _. .��,
�
C. Woric Product
The proposed project will be implemented in four steps: 9) Development of the Bgiona!
G/S base and development of �ference maps, 2) Conversion of the regional G!S base
for use in communify GIS planning and development applications, 3) Delivery of
failored training suppo�t for prr�gram participants, and 4) Determination of ongoing
maintenance r�quirements and prngram r�frnements.
1. Development of the reaional GIS base and qroduction of reQional pianninq and
development reference maps:
a. A portion of the Dakota County GIS parcel basemap, covering the 11
applicant communities, will be acquired from the Dakota County Survey and
Land Information Office. A process and time schedule for acquiring parcel
updates will also be established.
b. The county parcel basemap will be enhanced by incorporating additional
geographic boundary layers important to later planning and development
applications. (These layers will be obtained from existing digital files or
developed by digitizing from paper maps)
- 1) Planning and finance districts.
2) Metropolitan Urban-Service Area (MUSA) boundaries
3) Municipal boundaries
4) Census areas (i.e., tracts, block groups, census blocks)
5) Pipeline routes
6) Transportation boundaries
� Zoning and land use boundaries •
8) Traffic Analysis Zone (TA� boundaries
9) Wetland inventory
10) Soils
11) TIGER basemap and attributes (covering Dakota County and portions
of adjoining counties)
c. Additional geographic features critical to commercial and industrial
development marlceting will also be added. (Existing digital air photos will be
updated and supplemented by digitizing site and engineering plans.)
1) Commercial and industrial building footprints
2) Hard surfaces (parking areas, roadways, sidewalks, bridges, etc.)
3) Selected utility lines (as required to show unique property amenities)
d. Attribute information pertinent to these geographic features and layers, will be
attached.
1) All geographic features cany a parcel ID number, full address, or some
other identifier permitting database associations to be made.
2) Specific databases selected for use with the GIS system:
(a) Dakota County Assessors Office - CommerciaVlndustrial property
ownership and tax data.
(b) Municipalities - zoning and land use designations
(c) U.S. Census Bureau - full base of population and socio-economic
characteristics.
5
. • .
2.
(d} Metropolitan CounciVMunicipalities - current paputation estin
(e) County/Municipalities - daily traffic counts
{f} Private reat estate infotmation source(s} - subscription data r
commercial and industrial property size, amenities, te�ancy,
vacancy Eevels.
e. Five high quality, large #ormat (36" by 48"}, caiared regionai ptar�ning and
development reference maps will be crea#ed and copies provided fo� each
praject participani Suggesied maps include: �
1) Loca#ion af Dakota Cauntv Commercial and lndustrial Properiv - shows
location of alt devetoped cammercia[ and indusVial property in ihe caunty
color-coded by zoning Gassification. The map includes municipal
boundaries and a table at the margin showing acreage by community
and by type.
2j Buildable Commercial and Industria! Pra�ertv - shaws location of all
property specified by eaci� cammunity to be available for deve(opment ar
redevelopmenk Type oi anticipa#ed development is color-ccaded and
acreage by iype of use is provided in a tabte at the margin.
3) ReQional Traffic Analvsis Map - showing current and anticipa#ed tra�c
� valumes along primary transportation comdors based on tra�c caunts
and projected TAZ volumes.
4} Resident Democ�raahirs.Map - shawing popula#ion concentrafiaans by age
and income ca#egories for small area geographies. The da#a will be
shourm at census biocic and blocic gcoup tevei detait. Municipal �unts
will be provided at the map margin.
5) �abor Force Demaaraphics MaQ - showirtg labor €orce concentraitons by
occupation and industry. The map will also show percentages of�the
labor facce smptoyed in ar►d autside of the countY-
GtS base tayers and data, specific #o each participating cornmuni#y, will be
created from #he regional base and delivered to each community parr�iicipai
1) Communities have or wil! purchase the same G!S software for use in
local planning and deveiopment appiications,
2) All of the GIS data developed at the regional level will be partitioned by
cammunity and delivered for use on that cammunity's GIS softwa�e.
3) The GIS files will be updated at least on a siyc month basis as Co�nty
parcet fiies are updated.
Two or three c�astom applications witl be deveioped, based on pas�i�cipan#
specification, far use with each communi#y's own GIS system. These
cus#om appiications witl support key ptanning and deve[opmeni needs, such
as providing fast access #a property t.�x and ownership information, query
capabilities, and ad hac map production. �
Six to eight large format {24" by 36"}, colared pEanning and develop
reference maps will be produced for each participating community.
ctzoice af maps wiU be made from a list of map aptior�s, permitting �
C=
community to taiior a set of maps appropriate to its own circumstances and
needs. The following are examples of maps that might be utilized
inclependently or in cambinatian wi#h one anather.
1) Zoning map �
2} Comprehensive Plart map
3) CommerciaUlndustrial parcel inventory - citywide
4} Commercialllndusteial parcel inventory - devetopment distrtct
5) Redevelopment plan map
fi} Transportaation comdocs and iraffic pattems
� Environmentaliy sensitive development zones
8) Demographic analyses {e.g., incomes, housing, famity characte�is#ics,
age, occupation, etc.)
3. Deliverv of taiiored traininq suaaart for proqram aarticipants
a. The project wiit offer a two-day G!S training workshop. The wos�kshop wiA be
designed #a supply #he necessary knawledge needed to work with the G1S
data supplied to each city. The worlcshop would be available to County,
Pactr�ership andlor Gty siaff.
b; Two days at on-premise, hands-or� GIS training wiil also be affered to
community and Partnership staff. This personal attention wiil permit GIS
usecs ta review and re'snforce GIS pnnc�pals white warking on tocally retevant
projects or to help worfc through particularly camplex GIS issues.
4. Deterrnination of oncloinq maintenance r�equirements and procfram refinernents.
a. Cornmunity applicant are committed #o a minimum of thcee year additional
suppor# for this projec�. During the first year, a main#enance plan will be
developed and approved by all participants. The plan wiN establish the
requirements and timetabie far alt data updating and conversion� and for
reference map updating.
b. In addition to data and map updating, the maintenance plan will identify
planned enhancernents including addit'sonat custom G1S apptications and
additional reference mapping.
Documentation will be maintained far purposes of administering this projec�. This will
inciude a defaiied project ptan and timeiine, da#a structure tayout, and dacumentation
associated wi#h development of custom GIS applications. This information will be
avaitable foc use by ather communities and regional organizations in#erested in
duplicating this project Copies of reference maps and application programs will also
be availabte for the cost of duplica#ion.
D. !mplementation Process
This project will be developed aver a period of 12 months. !n addition, participants
have committed to maintaining tf�is program for no tess than three additionat years. A
detailed implemen#ation timeline is provided in Exhibit I.
7
_ ' r
The proposed praject will run from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1995. Fu
integration wi!! occuc by the rtinth mQnih, at which point the enhanced regionai'
base wiit have been deveioped and iocat data and applications witl have been
to each applican# community.
Community staff wiil participate in the projec# in finra ways. A technical staff pei
each community's Ptanning and Devetopment Departmen# has been identified.
person will be responsible for ensuring that the developing regional and comm�
bases ace compiete and acr�arate. Tiiese persons witl also become #he princip
operator for community planning and development purposes. Each community
agreed ta commi# 15 percent af a tectynicat staff persar�'s time to this project.
I
!n addition to these individuals, participants on the Datcota County Ecanomic
Development Partnership (i.e., planning and developmen# management) will be
respansibte for establishing GIS application and mapping priorities. A committ{
Econamic Development Direc#ors meets monthly to provide management for th
projec�. Aclditiona! meetings wi!! be scheduled as required to support this proje
lnsight Mapping & Demographic, Inc. wil! be retained as G!S Cansultant to sup�
projecL �insight Mapping has significant experience working wifh Dakota Caunt
the applicant municipalities in GIS development and has particular expertise in
af GIS planning and econamic devetopment applica#aans.
E. Prc►jec# Bcsdget
�
Project deveiapment wi11 cost an es#imated $225,000, Of this total, $127,500 a
kind contributions from the par#icipating communities, including equipmen# and
purci�ases, and staff t�me commiiments. 'ihe remaining $97,500 from the Boar
Gavemmen# Innovation and Cooperation wili be used to suppor# consuitant cos
data a�uisitian. These costs are broken inia the follawing categories: Basem.
development and reference mapping ($78,500), custom applications ($7,500), ;
#raining {$11,5Q0). Detait on the budget is pcavided in Exhibit lt.
�
!t is anticipated that ongaing GIS devetopment ar�d maintenance wiil require coa
commitments of $5,000 #o $7,000 a year. These costs wiil be distributed amon�
commuities based on a flat service fee plus a propor#ionate service fee based c
capita paputafiaon counts.
The applican# communiies are laaking ta the Board of Govemment Innovation �
Cooperation #o p�ovide the necessary additional funds ($97,500) to get this inte
GIS capability estabtished. Discretionary municipal funds are being severely ra
by app`licant communities, particularly the smaller communities with limited tax t
Doftacs that might have been invested in ti�e devetopment o# GIS informatio�n sy
are being diverted to major infrastructure projects critical to these developing s�
communities. Wittzout #I�e availabiii#y of ou�side funds, �is very important infor�
system develapment project will not get underway. Communities tha# can find I.
hands witl begin defining their local needs and the opportuniies io apply develo�
a cost effective integrated environment wiil be lost.
8
�on in
Th`rs
nity
il GIS
has
C�i
>rt this
and
! types
�
of
and
the
per
�
EXHIBIT I: PROJECT TIMELINE
Dakota County Muiti-Community GIS Project
1. Reaional GIS Base Enhancement And Manpina
a. Acquire GIS Parcel Basemap From County
b. Add New Geographic Layers
c. Update Critical Commercial/Industriaf Features
d. Attach Pertinent Attribute Databases
e. Produce F(ve Regional Reference Maps
2. Conve�t Reaional GIS Data For Local Applications
a. Split Up GIS Layers And Data For City Use
b. Develop At Least Two Custom ArcView Applications
c. Produce S(x To E(ght Reference Maps For Each City
3. Deliver Tailored GIS Training Support To Program Participants
a. GIS Training Workshop
b. Hand-On Training For C(ty And Partnersh(p Staff
4. Determine Ongoing Maintenance Requ(rements � Refinements
1995
Jan. Feb. Mar. A r. Ma Jun. Jul. Au . Se . Oct. Nov. Dec.
;:�:; :::;:«v::
. x.:. .
::•,•.:f:::><,
:n;rnvnjf��y:•;• y:C�'�f �'i�'k:
> F.. v f. ;. •S+.`4{k:f'i•.:;:�.�
::;: f � <<�:;t., `�:;;.f,'�>.; . y.
..:.v:::�: ..:..:. . ..x.:..G.••:: `:•:'t
.....,,;,::•{,:�:,•r w•�,c�••: -
•';y1.l.,iw n, t� i p. F,X, ��
\ ' � ri•�
�::.,.�>::
»:<:�<::;:� : .;»:.:.
<::.<�:,:�
r<;;?v`•�`:x '`:�i;>��:;:;;.; x:;3i
f i:�f.:...fi}n�Y�: }•.n4.'•
iY�i,:r� r
i;:;:•:':.���4 y;4•i:S.�:?`:
]C:}: n "'4.}•,y:
: r'F.•iw' '
,,;•:t.zr:�>: �r.w.�;z:� y,�):;4•:x:• >•: �.;,•, •.;�.,:
C+F.iwii: �$: :�i:�:• i i.;i;�Ti.'�i'i'�%:ti}..;ii{:CCi.�
:t.f:::��:�:
•i•$;}+�jT, '�k� �,x'rV$,rii� �: i�:}•Vl,.ii::4:;:''.+iLr;:ti+v'>
}:?•'.:: �:hi:+fl.::ti^:.��i'.��...�.^: '� '?' .
:;.:�$v,.::<:
: .� • , i
Dakota Gounty Multi-Community GIS Project
First Year Startup Fundinq:
� In-�nd Fundinq Grant Funds
r Projed CaorcJination (Partnership � 20%) �22,000
Comput �r Harciware (486 or Pentium PC,
12+ MB RAM, 500+ MB Hard Drive) a50�000
' Additional Hardware Upgrades a25.000
GIS Computer Software (Arcvew 2) �10,OU0
I
, City Assigned Staffing ($30,000 x 10 x 1596) �45,000
I
GIS Database Development and
LocaURegio�al Mapping
Arcvew Macro Applications
Workshop and Hands-on Training
�
Totai First Year Funding $152,000
_ � . ..
City Assigned Staffing
Ongoing � IS Data Development
Ongoing Training� if needed
1
Annual Funding (Years 2 through 4)
�78,500
a7,500
$11,500
$97,500
New Financial
Existinq In-kind Outlav
$22,000
$45,000
$60,000
�� �12,000
�67,000 $72�000
Total
Fundin�
:5,000
0,000
�7,500
11,500
49,500
Total
aoo
12,000
39,000
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
MEMO
TO: Ma Or, Ci Council, City Adminis
Y� �Y
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson ��
City Clerk
Canvassing Boazd Meeting
Asr you laiow, the city election will be conducted on November 8. In accord�
state law, Council must meet as an Election Canvassing Board within two days after
to canvass� the city election results.
For many years, the Canvassing Boazd meeting has been held at 5:00 p.m.
after the election. I recommend that this tradition be continued and that Council s
canvassing board for 5:00 p.m. on November 9.
�
, ACTION REOUIRED
� '
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should schedule the Election
Board meeting for 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 9.
� �
r
26, 1994
with
election
the day
dule the
0
S)
L
N
co
co
N
3SfOH38VM
0
00
II m
O
rJ
N C
-73
m
0
W
to
N
0
m
A
O
G_
O
m
C
0
m
C)
m
D
A
m
II
N
O
0
0)
1
0
A
0
N
(n
902'017 = V3aV 3SfOH3aVM
y)
01
0
a
(0
y)
l
Fri
NJ
C rO
m m
A A
r
m
m
✓
z
z
Mdld 13A31
m
S31fO3HGS
a
NV1d 301330 DVAH
NV1d DVAH
F
N
-o
r
C
F
m
O
z
Z
S
T. HWY 55
co
m
0
D
S311103HDS
TVOINVHDJW
1V01613313
a
N
W
A
0
0
m
NV1d ONIWVad
TI
r
0
0
A
NV'ld ONIWVa1
1n
NV1d NOILVON110a
1Vanl3naiS
'NTERIOR ELEVATIONS & DETAILS
NV1d ONI1133 031031d3
S11V130 — NO1103S SSOaC
11V130 — SNOIID3S 11VM
SNOIIVA313
SNOIIVA313
NV1d d002d
S1IV130 2'
NV1d 6001:
C
A
o
m
A
�8 W002:1 — 13A31
S311103HOS 6000
NV1d 2J00T.J
NV1d 2:1001L
1A1006 — 13A31
S37103HDS 8000
STORM DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN
NV1d 3dVGSONVT
O
A
0
Z
c)
v
z
Z
3115 — VIVO — X30NI — 311T1
0
C
1VaniG3iIHDaV
X3CINI133HS
J
D
l
2
g Z
33 Y
Z
-0
Z
0 D
XI
m
dV(ld 1VUJN3O
9£b9S NW 'vNIda
"3AV NJ1RIHI 9L£17
83131/3IN - - VI1OHA-1I-1
z
C
F
J
2
LILYHOLM - - NIEMEIER
4376 THIELEN AVE.
r
41
99 AMH 1S
ZK-F-4
to Ft
SDE=W
is°QZ
oZQ
QWZoi
_°i�
~>jFO
- Wow
I- Oah
aa
W�F
Wffw
>WOD
tt
aua�_ I
W��QF
13�Qz
0
W
4
z
O
LILYHOLM - NIEMEIER
4376 THIELEN AVE.
co
Q
z
a
GENERAL PUMP
CD
a
aI
2
41 1'
v'•\
4
e/tA-
ID\ERICKSUN\UENPUNP\GENPSTAI 9/22/94 2:04:16 pm
6
g
1
a—
‘13 --
CS
0
J
55 AMH iS
NOTE,
I. EXISTING L'W/ AREA ON MOORE PROPERTY
2. THERE IS A HIGH AREA ADJACENT TO WALL- CUT
TO FORM UNIFORM GRADE TO GRADE.
asio
I
836
6t1,----_ /�
��. t
e,12 ---�'� �,c �------7-
‘9 u/ 1 li
I
I
l �
1 �
—, — �—
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
7-4
I
--1-- -- —
NOTE
SPOT ELEVATIONS (x 822.4)
TAKEN II -7.-94
S.T. Hwy. 13
e22
WERTHAUSER RESIDENCE
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS BY CITY
ENGINEERING STAFF
-94 GK
\\ loijion9
c4ikt; clt ra.oX' Mr?E)
PIeort(iY ,IkJ FtirI SSt>''
D (14 E2Zt1Z'.
Net
:4oAft. :NCE , ¢'.c' r?
wrr, 4 Of- ^jos?S. 5 rt
PrOCE. F4 , i t1 a
PPK L' je,Rtlut../tr- 2
IaR D PAt'grkW. (5LL ' .-)
Cou i'M i G.n t? M40 p
oI¢o9t I'F.+J
oVJ J -$ PRIor, 'To f7b • \._
GOaFiM9 4 O )JEA, ?quo.
lc
ruYrp,L A-noN tIW M TiJtl..(1
kr ►Er,l6fi S7�Fi f. F N
E .+
r3
Cp 6 of
7, V.
mein
4 GhoI�Ghdet.
RF MNG Kr, (�,c.)
Fx Fit ug.
trA
c. hrJ4r114
N
C4
•n
en
5.
(MaJ
-a.o•)
EXI4T44et
4‘;!
I
cc,fr Nis.
icp svt.*Aft
Wrllrpry eCir\
Shrub
1Gos4., -�
(t 1 FL Ark / aIaroEV
® EX r-IoA AAA (
vIA Pak
cat PPrr4C SIS -44.
NA64-00-1 I-I-�1 &ft1%,
$A N - ks' 1 r €6 H &
(Gil) rfi2, oma, o4
14I1.66I4ts o%re,vicl ^"2 tD t, 32-C'.
,71lYISgi ??C$ r+ll,4GNCR w 'E ri"Hrifx/r
41,06 &t,“!4 1,91.19 P I.YM CL y>4 VN q 9441#
W N
64W ,olfkPcR
I 5 W DE (sr'E
i
of C JL.42EilS ijr-
1
t, A X
i e
♦ Z -
!ffl
Ji 6141,4EPoD
'0713 Nltir; :MJ+.UV 0%6 oKfo.
^+- 4 k4 S vU'.J 5"0. F'E,D,
,)Ios as.6 L-0,4 40‘ 'o -re. 44 - r'
4
A s'r,r'
i
L
4
(
Yr a
.-O 4fl - -i4-CP -i'h',"�
AO
ex a H+ -r
`iYPchL')k-
Java Krd
IOLAJ
S I rr TY CC
s
iKIGK. Arlb Irr'n i
Fr-titAD K. cs )-v4 ot. cw•JER (aa)
r�
JUNE G., I'44-
?E: 5 • a' wiCXw
.: tr cLENlr?15
s
0
A Fa
4-
I
tr ..PJJEL
rrol& & t
w i o lx' u/ &tow✓
&y°
EX- AHA
r1p��
cC
-•'S iaUci, ;N U. dE L h46 f -
J' 4x4f FEJIC r SSS
N S'r6Rn ex- ‘At. PS cstq,
1m
a
a
C-)
1
N
\A\ mC
•/% O
LOCATION MAP
(NO SCALE)
A
•
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS
•
AVE.
\o•
44.62 // NW COR OF / 100.00
✓ LOT 2
r
LEGEND
DENOTES AREA OF SUBDIVISION
DENOTES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
TO BE VACATED
• DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND
0
EN r
NI I
1/4J 0 L I V I /--1
N'LY LINE OF LOT 2
S 89° 50' 14" E
DENOTES I/2" X 14" IRON MONUMENT
SET AND MARKED BY R.L.S. NO. 12294
N E COR OF
LOT 2
pr_- n l I Ir
14VLLI\,UC
110.00
DRAINAGE &
PER UTILITYPLAT IgyI5
5r
N
5
LOT
4
FRONT SETBACK
/33
RI 4'420.
/8000 [306„
190 pO „ 00 „ I /
CC\ nR3\Olp° 2op o`' V et
;8.93
N k.7 455' 00" E M 63020$
CIRCLE
S E COR. OF LOT 2
44.56 „
p a
42°32'
58
Rs60.00
SCALE : I INCH = 30 FEET
EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED
P\O LOT 1. BLOCK 1, NORTH IVY HILLS SECOND ADDITION
The easterly 5.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, NORTH IVY HII I S SECOND ADDITION,as platted and
of record, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 5.00 feet and the southerly 10.00 feet
of said Lot 1.
P\O LOT 2. BLOCK 1. NORTH IVY HILLS SECOND ADDITION
The westerly 5.00 feet and the easterly 5.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, NORTH IVY HILLS SECOND
ADDITION, as platted and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota,except the northerly 5.00 feet
and the southerly 10.00 feet of said Lot 2.
P\O LOT 3, BLOCK 1, NORTH IVY HILLS SECOND ADDITION
The westerly 5.00 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, NORTH IVY HILLS SECOND ADDITION, as platted
and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 5.00 feet and the southerly 10.00
feet of said Lot 3.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
A strip of land, for drainage and utility purposesover, under and across Lot 2, Block 1, NORTH
IVY HIJ I S SECOND ADDITION, as platted anc of record, Dakota County, Minnesota. The
centerline of said strip is described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence South 63 degrees 22 minutes 15
seconds West, bearing assumed, along the southerly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 8.93 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 01
seconds West, parallel to the easterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence
northerly to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 2, distant 30.00 feet westerly of the
northeast corner of said Lot 2, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE kND UTILITY EASEMENT
A strip of land, for drainage and utility purposes, over, under and across the westerly 10.00 feet of
the easterly 15.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, NORTH IVY HII I S SECOND ADDITION, as platted
and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota,
DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL A
All except the easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, NORTH IVY HII I S SECOND ADDITION, as
platted and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota.
DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL B
The easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2, all in Block 1, NORTH IVY HII I S SE-
COND ADDITION, as platted and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the
following described line and it's northerly and southerly extensions:
Commencing at the southeast corner of saic Lot 2; thence South 63 degrees 22 minutes 15
seconds West, bearing assumed, along the s utherly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 8.93 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be decribed; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 01
seconds West, parallel to the easterly line ofsaid Lot 2, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence
northerly to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 2, distant 30.00 feet westerly of the
northeast corner of said Lot 2, as measuredhlong said northery line, and there terminating.
DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL C
Lot 3, and that part of Lot 2, all in Block 1, NORM IVY HIJ I S SECOND ADDITION, as platted
and of record, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying>asterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of saidLot 2; thence South 63 degrees 22 minutes 15
seconds West, bearing assumed, along the sutherly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 8.93 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be decribed; thence North 0 degrees 14 minutes 01
seconds West, parallel to the easterly line of aid Lot 2, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence
northerly to a point on the northerly line of aid Lot 2, distant 30.00 feet westerly of the
northeast corner of said Lot 2, as measured long said northery line, and there terminating.
PRINTED
eT
o4 1994
JAMES R. HILL INC.
I hereby certify that this3urvey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and `sat I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the
state of Minnesota.Sig:ed this 3� `` clay of /CC -roe - , 199
By :
Gary R. Ha"'�- Minnesota LS. No. 10943
•
U
(cifi
07
O
LiuU)
cr
W
Z
W
CC
z
J
M
2
w
COJ
J
CO
2
m
0
w
H
2500 W. Cry. Ro.42,
fax 890-6244
i
DRAWN BY
SHP
DATE
9 - 21-94
REVISIONS
BOOK /PAGE
PROJECT NO.
94436
FILE NO.
1 -94-191
SHEET I OF I
Igo l /JJ 99'1
ZCt-F-4
0<w0
V/Di-
I w
- 0UZ
I-o<4Z
<WZOw�
i>oiu.
~WU
>-1--0
- owwow
(rum
U4
at -)-N
J -111
a wpw
Will I
541-
wv)
Zlan.
W
6
LILYHOLM - - NIEMEIER
w
Q
co
z
W
EDINA, MN. 55436
U)
0
cr
U
a_
d
GENERAL PUMP
NORTHLAND PLAZA
w
0
z
z
F—
Q
r