The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-04-07a` ✓, L CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY�, MINNESOTA AGENDA APRIL 7, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. - � 2 . ,Roll Call . - ��,Q �9,G„ _ i- ��j� � �v� 3. Agenda Adoption. -/�.� - 4. Approval of Minutes, March 17.�� 5. Consent Calendar: - /� a. Acknowledgement of March 24 Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgement of March Code Enforcement Report. c. Acknowledgement of March Treasurer's Report. d. Acknowledgement of Letter from Mn/DOT Regarding Installation of Traffic Signals at Mendota Heights Road/494. e. Approval.of List of Contractor Licenses. f. Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses. Approval of Cigarette Licenses. �; � c� �r��.,��:�. End of Consent Calendar. ��Q �f�,� �'�' �� ,,,�� 6. Introductions. 7. Public Comments . -� �.,� 8. Bid Awards and Hearings . �, a��1 �� `�3 y� ,�`l'a. o/ a. Dum Tru`c} �, Bid Award. �� a�� r�' 4` �,G �? av a L -�p�-� �� 4� . /'i/' �-P..�r-, , �-.-�,..� - G jj°�� 4��-�" ��-�� b? Feasib'lity eport HE RING - S atford Woods. 7:45 P.M. ��-s� c. Easement Vacation HEARING Park P1 ce.G"'�. P.M. (Resolut' on � 87-29) . _�� , '�� d. Kenneli%� -2�ric�� t H�ARING. 8:15 P.M. Ordinance No . 2 31) . - j"� . � . C%,,.l. � G=� � �-- I�� • G��!` �,-- /�� e. Aircraft Noise Ordi anc HEARING. 8:3o P.M. (Ordinance No . 2 3 2 ) • (�,,;�,�-,� �. � ` aa /J . "�/ 9. Unfinished and New Business:' � . a. Case No. 87-01. Schweiger, Variance. -�./�� . b. Case No. 87-06, Adrian, Variance.� 0 R m � yr �G� � c. Cas N_� �7-07 , Kilb Varia ce ,,g� �� '� �E�l ,u, -� -- `��'�SU � •�="��/� • d. Re est for� x�mption of Performanc Bond Re uirement. e. Ma�,/ �� .,..�-.�-,- G rri�tt Li uor L �cens�e�A� i�o � ��` - J ' �q �%i�. -�-� ' ��-w{ - � : / �� . f. Und rata di of Deferr ent for B yd Ratchy Property. ��.� g � ,��'- �� Pa� ond Re e� re u�i (Resolution N'. 8-7 30) .-� g� �� .;�a'�- _ �: 3� h. April 1 orkshop Ses n. y�'�, �, � �� .�-----� (� _ , o.�`- 9;ov — 0 ,T � 10. Response to ouncil Comments. i'' e 11. Council Comments. 12 . Adj ourn . - �. �� J � a � CITY OF MENDQTA IiEIGFiTS �� April 7, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin D��il, Ca,ty Administrator Re: Add On Agenda far Meeting o� April 7, 2987 Three items are recammended for addition to this evening's aganda, two of them for the Consent Calendar. New information is provided regarding Item 9.q. Parks Bond Referendum. ' . 3. Actenda Adaption It is recommended that Council adapt the agenda with the addition of Item 5.h. List af Claims, Item 5.i. Acknowledgment of Timel.ine for Hwy. 55 Corridor Study, and Item 8.a.1/2. Consideration oE Bids for Spring Creek Acres/Valley Curve. . 5.h. List af Claims Please see attached. 5.i. Acknowledament o�' Timeline for HwY• 55 Corridor Studv Please see attached letter and proposed timeline as prepared by City Planner Howard Dah].gren. 8.a.1� Consideration of Bids for Sprinr� Creek Acres/Va11ey Curve Please see attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Dana.eison. , 9.ar. Parks Bond Referendum The Parks Commission met last evening ta considar the future of �he planned referendum and our parks development program in light o� the failure of the School District 197 Board to approve the agreement for joint development and use af the Sibley athletic complex. The Commission concurs with the 0 Paga No. 2514 May 20, 1986 , complete the project. Mr. Danielson informed the Cauncil that Mr. Mickelson is a hamebuilder wha is -- warking with the CZapp Thomssen Company as representatives af Brady High Schao�, the owner af the pzoperty. He�alsa brought up the issue of engineering fess which had been incurred by the City - in�the preparation o� the feasibility report and ' plans and specifications for drainage improvements. He stated that at.a pa�t Council meeting at which Mr. Terry Davern of Glapp-Thomssen wa� present, it was suggested that the $Z,527 in engineering costs be equally divided between the praperty awner and the Ci.ty./ Councilmember Hartmann stated that the engineering casts are for a creekbed project which benefits the subject property and that he would not be in favor of the City absorbing 50% of the costs. Mayor Lockwoad cancurred, painting out that the engineering work was done at the request of the prior owner. Iie felt that a considerabl,y greater portion of the engineering study was for the benefit .of the suiaject property than for upstream properties. - " a Counezlmembe"r Witt pointed out that the engineering work was done not far an area storm sewer project but rather so that the Callahan property could be developed.' Mr. Mickelsan stated that discus�ions over the costs were iieid priar to his invalvement in the project - and referred ta a report prepared by City Engineer Kishel. He fe3t that the cost is excessive just for the rerauting of the stream and �ome drainaqe work. Mr, Danielson responded that the pZans and specificatians had been prepared, bids were taken and the�praject was staked, all in respanse ta Mr. Callahan's request to "fast-track" the praject and his petition and hearing waiver. Mr. Mickelsan asked whether a partion of the cost could be refunded to him if he assumes the total cost now•and an upstream project is completed in the £u�ure. City A�torney Hart indicated that this wauld nat be a prob2em. He pointed out, however, that it would be �ifficult ta establish a benefit upstream by moving the ereek, since it seems that the major reason for the project is to create three buildable lots on the property. Page No. 2515 May 20, 1986 Mr. Mickelson stated that he agrees that most of the costs are attributable to the property and would accept the costs, but asked that they be incorporated into the project costs and assessed against the properties. - • _ Councilmember Cummins moved to confirm approval of the 1984 wetlands permit for Lot 2, Willow Springs Addition, approval of the filling of the property one lot at a time, along with authorization for the Mayor and Clerk to execute the developer's agreement as amended to remove the first paragraph of the third condition and to reduce the escrow deposit in the same paragraph to $3,000. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 :iays : 0 LILYDALE UTILITY The Council acknowledged a memo from the Public CONNECTION Works Director responding to a letter from McGovern Realty requesting approval of the connection of a property on Highway 13 (at Victoria) in Lilydale to the City's sewer and water systems. Mr. Dean Larson, from McGovern Realty was present for the discussion. " Mr. Larson-stated that he represents a developer interested in purchasing the two acre site on which 24 townhouses are proposed to be constructed. Mr. Larson stated that he feels the proposed hook-up charge reflected in the Public Works Director's memo was excessive, particularly the interest calculation, and asked that Council consider reducing or delaying payment on the charge. Public Works Director Danielson informed the Council that staff receives numerous inquiries about connection of properties outside of the City to the utility systems and that most often people choose to install on-site systems because of hook-up charges. � After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to table the matter and to direct staff to prepare a recommended policy for utility connection charges and to prepare a recommended connection charge for the subject property consistent with the policy recommendation. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. es: 5 • . YS� � Councilmember Blesener exp'ressed concern that even '" though Council has :�o contro3 over development outsi% of ' ��...�-.,-.�.:,�w--�-- - _��__.��..__...._---�...�_.__a.�__- ---- . . - � � � � E sta�f recammendatian to cancel the April 22st referendum. They further recommend that the Commission and Council meet in workshap in the near future to discuss issues and identify alternatives. - Commissi�n Chair Jim Stein will be present at the Council meeting. I� Cauncil cancurs with the Commission recommendation, this s�ould be a fairly expeditious discussion; and you might want to mave it up on the agenda a� a courtesy to Jim. ,� ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the Commission and staff recommendation it should pass a motion adapting the RESOLUTIQN RESCINDING RESOLUTIaN N4. 87-23, and set a date for meeting in workshop wi�h the Parks Commission. , - . Dept 10-Admin Dept 50-RdsBridqe -" /3/87 CLi1IM5 LIST %' ';------ --15'Ez�4r - ------60-Utility - ---» �i�f _� � �� 24-Holice 70-Parks � __.,�.__.__ _ __fJnoa`x6-Deca-iF�d-Eheck- Regincer---- 30-Fise--- .-----9�'p�a^^;^q _�, _ Citv uf M�naota Heiarits 40-GE4 44-Anssnal Cantro2 -----•----Paqe - i--- Invoice p.0. Check� � J�� ' � Invoice � y sur "'amoer�—lVuatber-F�r��----Date-•- -Racount Ccrcfa -.._—.qmounb,---.- ----^--"'-----------'--^--"----------------------"------'-------------^--^--"--"--"---'--'^--------------------------------- �» alhinson �------ 37016� -- ----- . --------------- ---- - ' E 054�,0010515 » .� _ 2�8.c9 ice TataY' c�8.'�3 ----.T.''6kb& - 543-a�': ='--" - �2; �.�'.� Invoice Total 26'3.54 �7seaa e ia44�0mm0aa ��.4�n bnw=«ice--Tc'�ta2�- _.--.296:94 ----Ch ec k- Fot a 1---.---.. ._-. ^c'36. 84-- 1? a1i.&T . ' �31-42-1L1tD�470 - ---�.�29 E 03421+Il05flSa 6.73 4::.1ID0Z0.Z0 � ��+- E 154�1�tlrD6rii6Qi 6.74 _ F�ai4.:La,a2a2�+ � a� E PJ2421007@70 7.36 _ r ��+; ce�Iatal �B_82 CI3BCI;.--T^-� �^ 3 .SB:-8� So�K t —c-v4jr�42534-4iS �9f. E Q11442531070 14.9E 51 E 014k2531530 75,11 !6-�"�l�.aBsn 4�3b� b4c83- E�2-'�4240836Q�� 7&:+Dti Invaic� T�ataS 7$.00 Check iotal 78.@0 :� Coay Equio Co 150961 E 10443000000 9.28 nvo-i-�r--Fat � 28-- - — —Etr=cicc-�at-a� � �$— :9• iiER-& •--- — --.—_-E-+3f-42ED�DCs{Ds�i+fi---�---- -t; fs�7t2.-+2Jt3�— E 0142006a@20 905.00 ^- r +5542�D+D6�+Di5� t; 664.-@�_�.. � " Invoice Tota2 4�170.@0 Dennis Delmont Cheak 7atai E k11�42502�D�0 4} 17yD. 0fl 2�0. 00 _._...,_�.--Check-Total--... ___.__ .-�20.00-•--- :ti'T"ksctser<st3as—'— -----__---- .--.-- —E'-iBYa3304kt32 -_�_...-___._,._4;.:'00 ---- • Invoic� Total 4S.v?0 - - ; 7 ' �r ,r.... -'� ; �' ..,�,.w�t> ,-�..- .s•.+..�� •�: _ _ ' . , -'o;.:.v�:'.. � •.�-, '�„��:_�:Ft`:at:�Y4$5��.�Ft3�_'t i..:z;'• - , '-- "-'"-'tTneaid"�etailed'"Cheek Reaister " " City or Mendota Heignts Invoice P,O. Check -'-' -Number ` "-itTumber "FinaI'-' `Date --' ...,-------------------'---------------------------�--------� _�------.��----��_____.�..__._..�-Pacs �___._ Invoice Rccount�de - ` � Amount--- __ _.._,,,�---.--. - -- - . . .--•-- .__._ — ___..._ Check T�tal 45.05 3 Kevin Fra�e12 JW �� E 01441511010 175.00 . ._ --- �---� --- -•---E- 0-F4400Y-i+�4t� —3�2: a2 E ilD4490041000 60.82 - --•-----.__.w_ -�_.._ __.�-�E-@14�0e1t@i0 --- 52:99-- Znvoice T�ta1 290.8: .-__ �_,�.»-•-------- � -�---••- ---._.___.__..- - - -- .__._ .---.�.___..___-___�._ _-_-.--`----• _ _.�_. Check ;ota2 2'3a.B„ i GOR Corp - �----•--- 1a001 ! -- - �- • --»_ _ . .� - ----- � �11�2iD- ---- �--•-- - --- _ - "' ' �Qi. @�dc ,.. - - --_.-.-.---•--- - -•-- ---- Frwoice-Totxt�-------21c�.00c--- • 5290 -._--- -----C7-}h3t230 --419r,50 Invoice Total 399.50 55851 —T---�~ �- G 011210 39.50 -._ _r � .�� b rnrei��ivt e-r —�-4,s9.-00 8fa2 --��.�lc^30 50. �30c Invoice Total 379.00 � Check Total 379.00 i 6rrvdyear Service Stors 50829 - � a143.3Q44020 117.86 — -•---.__.._ - _--- - -_----•-•.._-_— i��a�al--._..-2-17.-8E -------- eck-i�ta . 6J 3-•FCM ---� _..-__ _� __._r. _.. � �..012@�2--...._. � �- - ----L09. 60 ._� E ID1413411010 73•9S _�"_.____. IY�VO�.C� T�,eh'��- 3.B:�SJ . —.�_.._�_'__"�_ . _`__ _'_—..�� ' �'il@Cit-�Q$�S _ '"_..__�.i BiS�rJS��.� M1-i YKSB i.36%S.—'__. _—"--^-�_id}2iL1=tC'c" __'._�t,G517f:0@'_— Invoice Total 25@.0@ _. - - — --- -- --- -----..-_. . � Check Total 250. 0@ : Paul Kaiser � M �J~ E 01426815030 � 721.50 Fnv<�aree-�ota2- -�2d-�54--- , ' ,._��___�..�—+� ---; heck Fatal•--• ---?21.S+II- B -�ottrl4r++rtt�- —.- �.__�_.,�__--------�. _ -E-a544-�51051'S --- � --•_..--- -__.10.00• I E 0544201051.; 50.00 � �,.44-b51�D5b5- - 13.�i 1 6 284k258370td 7.77 ---- ---- -------E--3�44-iS63900 ---.—__..__.._T_�__.__.,�..''«55 _..-_ t E 324415840Qt0 3, 4,:i . ^ �__ _.__�_.__�._�.__.E �b441;.84:4J0..--..- --._------8�0k. `.- , Invoicm Total 128. �:., ._. —._��---- -�---- --- t : .. K. . -. .. ..:...,. r ..3�,.r-C:.K =;�..:�'.'�t., . �.• ,�, .. « ... .., ..,- _ .. .. _. ;•..«e a..�...�:.,._:'.r.: Cb,. .t= ..� �:. �,s ------------Urroa►d Oeteiled Check-Reaister -- •-- _ ____ .. . _.. _. __.- __..- _-� _._paae o -- City ��f Mendota :iai��ss � � _._ _ Invaice ~�-P.O. �--- __ __ Check~ ---- -- •--•---__ .._.�. --- _.. .-... -. Znvoice ar, --Nurntrer ---- Numtrer�-F�inal-----Dat�- - _--._ - --Account Code� -- ----Amount ------ ------------------�^--------"----------^--�-----�^--�---------------`-----'---'--------------------------_______---�--------- Chec!t Total 1'�A.25 c uuy Kullander E 31441�8�300 2.52 - — 'E'Tifi�i4I50D000.. . — �4.57'� E 05426$65�II1S 3.57 - _ �- E�rJSG^c686.�+0I5�"'�- _.�.— SQ.OiD � E 0i44901IaiiD 12.70 _ . -'- .�"�-_E'p1S4rI5I05� 5 ---�_ �_�`��"--- 14. 23 invoxce T��iai 5:,. v'3 ` Ci12CFS TOY.a2 6J.S9 �6 League Mn Cities '� E 0I440031016 y 130.00 E-24f-4400 b t392r9- 52a:-0Sf-- E Q1I440010909 21.75 -Frev�rse--'Fa�aF---'v�-�. ��S _,__ r�., eck-�ota.7.- � 7-1 ��.:,-- � 3.: 1375 , �. n 00 Invoice Total 148.00 Check Total 148.00 �9 ��FT t-iP C/O EBP 04133 G 012Q174 7.38 _ E-Qt i-4131 G?��20 �6'3�4.s G 02G074 140.31 . _.._� _..__ .�—F-tD�141.s1F12@20-- —i?,9:aA Fnvoice iata2 626.86 Gheck Total 626.86 '? M�tro Waste Control 4039 E 15444906�d6�D 49�'s3�.30 ._.__ �._-- ----_.��R 143575.. �_. - ----------833.-.;.3c-� R 17��7.:i 2� 083. 33c .. —.— —Fwv+>iee�:,t�'s -46,r4c0.�6�r fo-f�hr�ier-Pri-rttri-ng—�- —1474 Minnesota-Conway 10841 3t3-Ati rrrc-Mutaaf-�i-fta--�rts�--�---'-- - —�'.h�ck-Tota-� -•--46; 42�04 - E-10rrk9�60�b00� --- fST:-00-- Invaice Tptal 157.00 Check Total 159.00 - E W2453003Qts'�L ----------- Fnvaice T.�tad---� 1 - •--- -----G 012074 •- -------- -.� E 0I41�S1I0IQ --------E 0f4k�2�d20'20 •-----__ T . E 1541�106060 ----- E-+P1433f+3707+D ---- 1� 341. 1Q by-341.-f 0-- ;341:�0- -- - -._-_�_23. B0� _.__. 2�. �'� _ _--- • _.._— -' 2 0.-4 �b---^—` 3. 40 -- -3:-Ai3--�- ' :�.,- :'v::�- a;f` ..,� ;vz...�_ ,�: ,L. _ .. .. � y.,..,..:«-_•' - rr:^� - ' - `'�r.'"� 's:£x:�'"..=.�'�,.,:.'�ctti3.',i3'�'33i:,5S,X�`:::::a:L%f::�'ir''.1NSr+t'�'w�h4` � :��e: � �ro".yi' '"" "-`-'-"Unoaid Detailed Check'Reai'ster "----- �� __ City �f M�ndota Hexqhts N� Invoice p.0. Check -� w____.,_�.._..___ -"--' �'aae �s Invoice _„_� '�"'" -"'-'"iV�irn6er �""'-iSum6er-F"ina'i -Date � "� pecount Cocfe � �� Arno��nt ------, `_�._----"-----------^-----"---'-----"-----^---"-----"----'-----"-----------'^------'-------------------------------"--- E 0541311 �515 ,;. 40 ' -- �--` -- - - —"-" Z»'vo z ce ' Toi a i` -" "- "� 64. b�.l � �-- .� . _ .- _"_-"Cfectt"TtSC�2"'__��"_"54: 60.. � V�wt#�we�b�;>:,-o�i-T-�2rorrortc._-..__.. __ E'0i"422�`fT�i'id-'-" --'-'"-�B6,aa E RI1422�0�td2a 172, :4 --._...-- - ._ _» _ �_..�.._..�__..__.._.___ .___._.___'E'@,i421010515'--------•--------•---57.37----- - �t422GIE35�� 37.87 .— _ _. _._ -- ----- ------•--�------- -� - - • - --E 254�k¢0608t3- --..._..__ .�. .._- --�- -��7.87'---�- B �1422+2�k17�T0 . 's7.88 "`- __ .��-.. _-.----E-1542�006a8@--- —_. ___.__ _!@9: 50".-.__ E Qi1482R307+2t70 29. �3 - ---- - �--E�2�+2•}�d��D30 k-Y6:-70--- Invoice Fatal $85.26 Check Total 885.26 � Oakcrest K�nn�ls E 01422180090 135.00 _'- 2-�rc.'+'�c� —50.-+Dt� Invoice Totai iB5,00 Check Tatal 285.0�D a Offics Products B$�854 E 0543@011d515 � 3.75 ��.�_ _.. -..�_..._�._._ � -�-nv.�tee--=F�ta1----- 3. �5 m 7 Duanm Sela»der .:�190- -�-$.1-430IIV�c^024�- ---- ---;,.-7-1 Z»voics Totel ' 7.46 F3�'7� 1 F::8v50' F41078 F41+D81---- 1 4-5 t5fl3f2- -- -��..-.�. E 1043+D0�D0til0�cl -"_.___-_-��_ i8. 37 �- --_,.--- '�nvoice-Tota. -1-9�.8:� --•- -------E-054a(d4i�8S15 ---- -.-.. 8.47 Invoice Total 28.30 �� E QI1430011�D10 33.72 ----- -- F»w}5ca-�ota�2 ----62.02 - ------E--�IiF430�2iQ+c^Q�ci�} --- �t.-1�- Invaice Total 66.1� � � Check Total 66.19 �� E 014415�@0?0 • 40.a0 ___. �..�_.._�..__ I�nvoice� T�tal -...-.._ ___-40�idd-- --�.,'^eck�ota. �0.�0iD--- ...___-�_.�.�_.... _,E-�D14.�05VJ202�.---.�- --.-----74.-&:,- _-. Invoice Totai 74.8.� W-�- --� Check 7ota2 �--~~ �_�74.8� � � .C'.='.2 � �" 5.�..:'Y.:..:�:. ..n' ^ Il :'r�r •�-'.`.�. F - �:� ' .x ..7 n�tk.. �L'� .� t. .r., . 3."�" .s • f { i -- ----• --- Unoaid Decaxlab Check Reoasaer •---- � City ut Me»aoca Hei�nts _ ---"Invoice --.P. O. �� Check �� ax• —,.Numbar�----f+4umaer�--F�inal ---•- Date --- ..--• -- -- ------ -.. __ _ _._ ._ __. _.__ _._ Paa�� 5-- . Znvoice� -Rec�urrt--Code -----------Amount---� ? �. E 5haugnnessy Jr ` �.. - - - - _ .. - �-- — - - - ... E �1421�01:,.'_32 f-- -• - - -� --M- --9T. 45' -- .... � _. __— E--�4��d1�?Yu -- _'—"Sk.-2.� E 214220132@0 is8.05 . _ --- _—E 2fi4c: 3r3�f ---wIItB.--�- E 034220132a0 65.50 - —�-2�#4�ht'S�-�0 6�Q7-- E 1.:,4:_ti�13�Ea0 273.2Q� �" � --"�� —i nvoice otal 2�340.00 . _. �_ .. _. _-- .----._ ._ T.�----- --C:^.eck -Tota 1------- ^c;'34T: c�Yt— i Siq_r�al C�,ar Wasi� — - ---c-�}24430+D2V724}— '---S�tl:•+arh— E a1443@02Q2v3 i7.37 --�-.,�i�•:�E�-i�._.b �a 3 � 7: �r--- —.�..�ecic Tata.1 6+�.-9.'r = Srs�jcdn» Drua Starcc i02187 —,C.�.,.m14,yp,5m2�D20 ' @,.3� —.— Znvoice Total 1�D.37 102199 E 0143050e020 3.�9 r...,.-•icn r;,+-a1 �L:, S5 �'fi55� c ,aLis ;t3_,fd?ti}20J 29 78- Invoice Total 3s.44 3 Southviea Chevrolet 345578 Check Total E 15433049060 33.44 23» 19 —=:33& ---.----- r n�' k3'0�fG0'�0 �ZA...04� I»voice Fotai �87.Z3 - -- — -- --- ---- Check ToiaS -+�287.2: l St'P�ul Di�patch PP 308662 E 01424a11010 57.6�d _ — ----�.h�cir-3ota3 ---rsz.-6Q! w�-S*tr+-Ne+ra S Y9 f E--43 f 424+32-i+hf0 - �9:-B�A � • Invoice Tatal 3�.�D0 74423 E 314240833410 3."*,.44 .__. ___—..�_.._ _�.------- —.._- Fnvoice�Total-- —.__ 7c'z:4ir 7kktk -�.^cha08@!6 , ' �� invaics Total - 8�.46 744i5 _�� „ - . �� E 444242l84800 �---.�^._---------- .. —.---13. � 0 ------� __�„,. __.___....�_�.�..._�_—. _..._�_._.-..�Erwaice Fata�----- —_—...96. 90 744Y E-44424�D8480@- --�� _ �u.. - - - "'�i�rii:::�.�f � "'�: � _ �..,.s,,._ ��!�� r�.�,..._._ _ : - �:F.� t�. w� �j..�� _ y u4.�:TY' :t � , Yf 0 "'-""'On�azd Detailed C�eck'Reqzscer""__ � _._ �_ �_e..__�__.�_..,__._ __--.---. - �,aae 6 M City af Menaota Heiohts ' - _ Invoice p.0. Check Invoice "'tVumCer--tCumber'-�Snal----Dats -_ ._._� ---i�ecoun£ Cude _ -_�_----- �-- pmounc_�_�.�..— ----_^�---�-----------------W----------------�--____..-------_____--------'------^--------------w------'---- Invoxce Tota: 109.60 74417 E �714'�401b8�8a � 9.86 ---. . — -%rcw#ce =f*a�cai�-----Y23.-Sfr-- '4tr£8- -^-- ---�-02424080+D9D--..- .------.---9.9� -- Znvoice Total 12�.u'6 .�w 74429 � - - - • ------- -� -�-•-- - ---�.. _ +2�i424�:0�t��1 - ---...—.-- - --------" 2_. 66 a --_.._—__,.__ ----- --- -•----•- -- � -- __...--�-------• ---_nvazce-Fata2--- ------...15+it.-7?-�•— �4:�40 ------ — --�----E d!1°421rOQ6iDA@-.�_� »....r��,�6.6iZr---- • Fnvoice Tota2 277.3� Check Tota2 177.�2 S8 Uniforms Unlimited 6�241 E 014420020^c0 � 9�.b0 - — --�- — 'r+v��ice-�cta-1 3�.63-- "5 -<:-<s'��=:�tv�c<r8@- i-70:-2�? Invoice Tatal 262.87 Check Total 262.87 "s'3 _ed Central TrustEe L16976 G 012071 � 4� 67.6;.r _ _.., - —� s._`__.__.��____,.E-m-I-4-is'2�ae.?fl _ tic'�.8�7+ E Ql1413205050 24. 10 .__ .... _...__.._..—.-.��-�..,., Sr. l :�41606@- -- -�^c,, i�7W ' � E @1413^c0707fl 12.ta6 ._ _ �,.__---_.�__�T,._�__.-------- I»vo-ice..Sata1- -------.156�66. . — — — Chac{.-�a�a�� G6�6E�. .v "Ufi'fZ"� --- ----' --- —6-+bb20-7QJ------ _.._ 91. 00__�.. Invaice Total 92.Q�0 � � Check Total 91.a0 � �7 Western Life In�urance Co 32614 E 01413�03130 127.10 .- — —S �vcri-se�-sta i 18�r1iTi - 62'+ack �ata�— ----12•x 1� ,� f1 T 2 T --- E-+D t-rt:= S 0 2 t:b16� ---.-- � 6, : _ � E 01421v�02020 2. 08 ` ----� ...__..._.._._ __..._ —,-F--Ri14k�'3ida4iD43---_.-.._.. _ .�—..4�2:w� .� Znvoice Total 14.94 Check 7ota1 kG.34 ... qcfvance Coro .._------------ E 204k90m�D0�Dt2f _ _._.�. �_ �...�_..--36. 1.� _ . ��-.__. ...__.._ ...-.,- �_._._. Tnvaica Total _...,__.�..__.�^E_1;.�..--. -- - � _ —Chock -Sotal .- --..----36.1� '.+r.n: •,.. - "i,;• - .. . ,.._ �iY':�. _ <,�:..��.. ...�i-�«."'wwsfur..i.;l'rJ�'.;"'�`sii'rs��,�.."--'.�.�.:�irah�i,��'�'.�'�ii�`1:i.i:.4.,)•H:�,..; R: � .._ _�.._..__._,�Lnoaad-.Det,ai=Ie0 G'�ock Aaoistwr.---.-------- �._..,,.._..�---._.�.__�._ ��----- Faoe� 7---- City u� hendata rieaghts .� Invoic� P.O. --- Check �-� -• - -."•----Invoice - :�� "'umGer- -Number-Fi»al--Datt- --Accauntr^-CaaE-. ------Rmo�.tnt"""-' "---'------'--"-----------'�--"--`--------'---'-----^--^-----------�-'-------------^--"--------^-----"-----------"------------ .. r+�1go Blackfelner �� ---.� _._ _ _ _. _ - - -- - ..- _ ..__ _��_� --- E T141�1020'2@ _ _�__..__---. - --» - --- - 3@. c,t� • - Yr�v�iee-T�caT -""'�d:�uIIt_'.'- ..,.- 'arx+,�-B.�ida 3Y'� 0'8e- 3@:'D0' Znvozce 3ota2 s0.�d0 Check 7ata2 ' 30.J0 - �arumissioMer ��f Trsot 5�637 �i � � E @f4: 224c150 � ' � v - .�8 �_. -- • =rnvo x ce- TYs�ai-------2�.'�� heeVt-T�3ta � "^cr^c�- .� !34GS , c T14'?�� ,�!}(}�oj6 Invaice Total 1,044,36 ^ Check Tatal 1,044.�6 .5 Dakota Cou�ty EtVTI E 014k0@03030 370.00 _.. _.._ 7,�,.,.,;,-s Tcatai ��m QU21 _Z Fn,•,�„ysc�lo��*� S.�toms � '"11+�+9004QW:; }Sd'�ORk £ �Z42440303@ � F85.0fd -- -s•nvorc�--FtsCa� -33&.-iB�-- �Yeo{!--7-Ata-1 � ''�8.-¢�0 �^a-z i-re--�9a�sMa��-A�srre� !+9#fler " 01'�'��81E03@�0 =�b.-@l�J Invoice Tata2 20.00 � � � M � � Check Total 20.00 .? ist Trust 8s216 E 1642�60000a 46,�,.75 � - Inv�ice-�•3ta-1 ---=�...��'.7�------ , .__ � __ �_ . ��-Ey�eck- Tota�-- --4bo,�5 Eti-v�:.a; a=-.^�.-.rnra�arrt�at-i�aw�---��-.�a-s66 4640�D@0ta4 - -�.,�.,0.s. .. • Invoice Total 13,SD3.00 75447 �^ E 224640�D0000 W 2� 832. 90 ... - __ __,.._ _._.__.-._�r__invoic�-Fatal--•----16�-335.aQ+- ^�.z.=-ic-Tote�i---� i6;-335:3.7i ti 'r:-ttna�riaQaa-Sp�tams -..-------_..._ _�. _-�..@2440211t2F10 -_..�__..__.__ __�----_,--16.45--- , Invoice Tatal 1£.3S - - -- ------- , _'.. Cheak Total �-•--- - - 16. 9S -_ Fl. _.. r .•'.. . J'� .^^t✓*. �. . . � - ' w:'.�:,:-='.:.«S"..�__'s :..: ya. � • rr: � u+.:..+i,s.:.:,i''.'hS' .?.-...�:.wtiJ�: tSL.: .[.� .M. a.. [�-. _ ,.r 3. " ' �• ' J.. •- -------- --"Unoaid Detailed-Check. Reqister --_._..___.^_.__�_____---- -----_�_ ___ __Paae 9 City or"yM�ndata Hezgnts _ _n+_._._._,..__._..--- ---------_. _�_�_^.._.�,_..�_�_.._ ._�_.. -- --""--'- --- - Invoice P.O. Check Invoic� :+ ---- -Nuruber ---'Nurober "'Fina2' '__i3ate-- -'------r�ecouint'C�de '- ----•----Aeiount .,. �--w_-..._----"'--------------------------------^__'-----------'----'-----------"--'^--------------'--------------------------- :. Dodd Technical Coro '75�$ E 1�."144"��Qi00Q0 385. �@ - ----. �._._--- --- -- —� �aiv��es�as�a ._ �__ ._ . —s2�: w¢r— E ��42Ea6�ais �5.�s _... ..._ ..�_._ .�_..__...��84�6855�36+d�- -----YSEc:�}3--�- c 214268650Q1Q+ 131.25 __ -.__�_...�_ .- --g-�642586�000 -- --��: Sa? Znvoice iota2 1,150.00 ��a� G os�az:a�:.,:a z.�.v� _ ._ ------• -- - -- ,- - . .. __ __ _ _.._ . .� .. _ .. _ - -- _ _... . _- -._..Imioa'ce Tota2 -•--• ----T; �T��'-..": �2-.- _ ��.___.__.__4__---•-------. __.__-�___�_ ___..--------Checx-F-ocai -•----�-1;-.'..2�� SsZr-- 3-C,�+r�-$ttss�i-r+�ss-6}F�tems------66}044 - -.- -----"-� •-E-204490V91L�30lQ ._7?:'-�2--- Invoice Total 272.21 Check Total 272.21 4 Larrie Mack �� E 014131Q12080 30.00 - ---�� razcr-�at a-�-�--��}:-�0- ' _- "�_-�- �-=a3 �8:tb@--�- ,. «ol Mac-Ico - _ ,��.b44-150:0�-,0 ",f8� « + Irtivaioe Total 42.00 v . � y--+--..� ~-��~ Eheck Tatal 4c^. 00 :6 Metro Sales 18S63fa u E 0f430011t320 IS.?tII ------ -^-^-•--E-034.300Qr40kv7•- . -l:.ti�fb--- E �143@005a�0 25.�R1 -._ -..._.. c �",4 ;000�Q7-iD �15 �b E 014300080$ib 15.20 _. .._., _--"--.- -- -- - -.E--'r3S43@02Q152;.-.-_. -�-. 15f2Qt-- E i.:,430006060 15. m5 - •nv-=�izz-rafai ---it�lEr:-c:� - f86283---..-- - -.- -•- - -E-�ti430Qti-E�bO-•- --3:-7�r Invoice Tatal 107.9'3 � Check Total 107.�9 'i Fnsighi E 054Q021051� - 15.00 . ----• - - Tnvoice-�c.ta� tu�u7@ . �.._ .. -...,_�-.._�_._ ^heck- Tc.ta-1 .��_-1��00 .Fa-{y.••., .�:m.rs-�-r:a-�-rv_ln•�-t.eGtr3�3rt- c-�0c.46 � ra,nr.rn�n.-lrn;�a ,�„-.�..r�a 3.:� I»vaice Total ii8.95 �^�--V--- - i-- Check Tota2 ~ � 118.95 � :9 Uavid Qimstend 570J246 � Mi�. E 0? 413102020 �y� � 30. 00 _ ,..�_ . __ -...�_Lssvo.ica.�ata� �__.i0. d0 �_. - 'r',r • ^ _�. ..`s.,. .r.: :F,.: - ' �'' z � _ A:tt,ti �d.o:s:ti �'?`i4:at�fai'•v'�"!'�..Lu.:i�' i'L�d�i.:s'�i:i''..�s'.`rL�.�'raw� - '�.:..� :oii�..:-�*.r�,-`'+. v • --- �-Unoaid Detailed Check Reoister - - -.- -. - - • --.- - __ - _ Paaa 3-•— Cisv of ?tenda�a 'r�iexqnts �, invoice _..--•P.O. �._... . - Check __ __, _��, .._ ___-. - ti - ---- --- -� Zttvoice .-� icr --_N��mb�r-•---Nuraber-Final -Date-.-.._.--._-Acr+unc Eons - - -- -�- Rmo�mt --- .__-�-----^--a--------^--��-------^--^--------------^--^--------�-----------^-------------�-------�---'----------^^--------- Check T��'taa �0. da ,J RMotos Inc 11421 �' a A's_�- 'E 10449QiD�DiD00 r^ 7@,4a � _._ ��_ .. .�_ .-_--.-Fnvoice� F�cal ._---_.. ....----7L�:4�--- _ ___.—__..-_. _ __ .--£hecFc-Tata-3--- ---------7t?: 4�d-- .: ..i3ac.£r_ay�RioYx.aeeka -.------- ._ ._. _ -- -- --- ---'- -. -------_�_..�-.E 014f3t�20Gia---•-------�-- - --�- 3 - 6: ��3'-- inv��?ce Fosai �E7, �@ Check T,�tai 30. �0 c Roger Plath -----W_._..��_...�----------•----`E 034131�Iic^0wca ._.------•-- ----�- 3�i3.@� �-^ - bnv�ice�-�tal ----,'s0.v70- -- --------- ---- —c��—r.,t�i ---.�o.+aa �.s..��ai -- - - - E-+��1+.305�?.i..:� —�Cr.z3� Invoice Tutai i&..:1 ` Check 7ota1 16..:1 w^^^,,•io Reyes T E�141,?.10c�d2a 2�.29 . � T �r:ai.ce.._�+�#ai -�g� 4c� . ___....� ,.._ - rh ak�atal-- _._�._.._ �''.,�.^:.9 5_M-4 G+gr.7-Cn ^6472L_-._�__...__..___ _.�__ ,E-8544^c08^c90J0-- �--f-lzs.-0'3 Invoice Tatal 11�.09 � Check Totai � ii3.09 '6 Fisco 8612P � E Q1i430503030 �1.48c ----- --•--- ----- • -------------•-------I»voice�Tatal- ._.�_--2#.-rlr6e-- • &�tb75._ -r-_ _-w E�134a�50347�'a@--- "#:-2,3-- Invoice Total 6�,73 Check Total � 6'�.7� :' Tractor Supply Co 681,:59 � 4 ` W � E 014305iL7070 �� N 64.48 T ----- ---------�--k:,1.3�#Sa6�Z+6�-- _---b++.48 Invoice Tatal 126.96 Y �� Check Tc.tal 128.96 8 Ed Vai 2 lancourt � � �� .� � � � E 0141310.^_+D2�D � � � �� Y � 30. +a0 ---•Invatc�-Tcta•t- ---3a:-�D0 1 ___.� _-._ _ _. ._ _..�_. . _--------- --.�.--- ----- •--�• - Check-Tota:l - - A.._�@.9i7�, �_. 9--Paactrer-?riTsti-rng- ----._Y890B_�_._ _., _M.....__...__...._.__,_._ �_ -- -- E aiaa�Ga�aa -- _._ .._.�..�._..._. _. __ ..;�p:00-._.__. . Inv+�ic� Tr�ta2 3.:0. t�0 ;s..'" xc ^ s. _ "•;,�.: + i"" <!cr" �i r s.` ':..a � ',i d + ' '-fa ' 't . . . . .:��ti.' ::K,:3i�j��'. �:k+:w•:[..c.a.:.£fi:�rer�.�`� � s-e"t-:v+e"'ivri.:.:.'�.�'..:rsv: : :" �� - �cw..o�.�+.s.k . . -�.�+.w.a.aer-�.... n ._ �_-_� _.._. ..-- - tJnoaiC Det�i:ed Check Reaister --- ---- -_...._�_ _.. _._-------._. - -.-- _ ._ oace 10 -. � Citv ��r MenaOca Hsz�nts Invoac� P.O. Check Invqice ,,.,y,_ r.��__.__ �,1taber ""-- Nun�4er -e=inai ---"D"ate -._---•--Gicco"u'rit-Loce-----.._-._-Arnount � ...,�--------------------'-----'___.,.-----"---------------------'--------"'----------------^---'-----^^--"-------- '-----------'---'- Checx T�:,tai „3�1.'r741 ��7 Ctiarles Whelan �+ y � E 05441510515 i� i� 17.5�^ ._ -------------_._.._._ __ _-----� � -2nvnies-•Tata1___�._'---17.':,?__' . _. ___..-_._.__ ._,.�._- ----.-.�_� �__ _.�.--'Check-T7tar_-_----_._»2?.ST-� �} -�rh�Vvi-ce--.-._.._ __ ._.. . ._.- -- . __ _._. _-- •-,------. - --•---E-014�4�Diital�d"------.._�.._.�_ __ __._.._ ..--3.00" .'-- invt�ice Tazei 9, r�0 " Chacft 7ota1 9.0td '? :Jastern Design & Prtg_-. ....`.�3i.�.7--- _---------------- ----�. E i0449�C10000�f l--------- --f�287.@� +- -- -'-"_----, -.--- -- Irrvoice-Tata2---_-.1; 28�t3-- _-.._ ��_ ._ . --�-Gl�ck-�ota�-----l-y 287: 0 "ul-- 3-rovt-Ft�a#�r�na �6ve ----__.._ __ __�,..._.w _ ....-� 014k+D@�-2-8�k� •i•25. �0 Invoice Tatal 1"�. �d0 + Check Total 12�.00 �4 �-aun Conf Center Y E 014k00110ia � 195.35 -' -------.-_..- .____.�_.. �. --:,.-.-s��e-Te«�ai ----�95.-,�u---- . - " _�____..�---_.--.--__r__.»__.�..�---•-------�.__.__�eheck-Fotaf-- -b9S:35---- 5-Gwq-�lt�b-l.-ake-WMO ---_---..--..- V._-�__._..�...-.E-kH41f0440@�,- .�-.i�,:b$,•6v. Invaice Totai 1,362.63 _...�_y._.__�_.-�------------• --_.__...._____� �.__�-Check Total � i,36�.63 �B Klayton Eckles � � � E 0544FSi41�r25 � 12.60 . _ _._.-_--. --- --- -- -------.____-.__.______��_ �,»uoi-ce Tatal __��.�.12_6iD�_ . _.r _-�. - -- ---------- ------ --Ch eck - '�ot a I- ---12. 60 � ' ----- -.�._� r�_ ^-rand-Total-...� .-- 8Sb15.0� 1 � �_ _. � _T -'�..--"'---' -'------ .� � ~T�T-+S . i�`i3�faLT%CiRYi'2M/Lt1w�i;�i�{�.y44�Y � ,�� "'K•+• •.y r ' y^.^Y:i 'dl i;: .''f�• - Yr-�: C�'� n rj •- y[�'.��'�� (� .[� i• . ~.•-`�'�•�-+fRib��4 iM+yV t��rir��4�4Ywi�ri4�+n�•:.. 0 cau�uaL c�rxs " " 11354 52.92 Road Reseue FD Eq --- " - - 11355 I.00q.00 NSP Rogers Lake Sub-statian ----.__ ___._.� -. ----- --� ._., _ _. -� 13.358 7,908.23 Dakata Caunty Bank 3/13 PST, FICA, MEDZGARE " � -'_- -'-Z3.358-4;832.35 '--" "-C�umissioner of REvenue - 2f27 6 3/13 5IT�------ - -- 11359 600.QQ Dakota County Hank 3/13 Payroll Deductions .�"_""'11360 "-3,524.27 Y" SCCU"------ ---- -- 11361 25,620.55 City M.FI. Payroll Acct 3j13 Net Payrall "-'- --- II362 • --'Y,SOQ.00 '-!- •-V; S:• Post OEfice '-� ------ -Stefill'�eter---- -- 11363 258.55 U. S. Past 4£fice Park Bond Mailing �.. "_-`-------•--IT364 ----2;506.85 -..�NSP -. —_.._ __. __ �--- •- 4f1 Due Date -- "- ---.- - 11365 30.04 No Star Chapter ICBO 4/'7 Meeting _ _.. �..- — - -_ _ _. _ I1366 - - -• 70. 00 _' " IC80 ' -- - -- - - 1987 Dues " -- - --..- -------------. ---.. _ _ 11367 29,172.38 City M.H. Payrall Acct 3j27 Nat Payroll -- --'---'----'". "-. -._`1I368 '" "12.00 -. Mn Police 6 Peace.OEf Assn 1987 Dues'-" - - -�"-- ---_�_�__.._. � I13fi9 102.00 City 5t Anthony Spring Banguet Municipals ` ----IZ378---5; F6S: Z9'"— - "PERA - _� - -.' "--- - - "i3/2.3' Payzoll — 12371 8,200.64 Dakota County Bank 3/27 FIT FICA MEDICARE _- -- - -_.__,._... _�__�1372 --"' 600.00 '""".-` --' ' --. ^ .".-- -"-'---"3/27 Payro2Y' Deductmons - ----- -- 11373 3,501.�7 SCC[J " - - �'95;654.60'----' . . �'T-JIBI ; 465 : 6Z"-'-"- - -- --� _._,_.____-----._j _��_�_.. 1 -- _ . . . _ �y, 0 �..a�'r:�11Fi_.ii�2:b;!«�7vwt;`�_Zr='�:L_ �1'i'iL'S�'iik2'F �`c^�' ii�+UP'^"'i:a.�a1•z�`_'� <^r"�'v.iJ.:.:::.:f.�.?; ii3��:�-�i�:+w' ��,is,{''=�c�'�x.:iC'�;�5:.. = �i:f...�:: �'• _ - — .. -w:w"' �•Q�c. 0 � 3 30 M arch 1987 Kevin D. Frazeli City Adminisirator 750 Sauth Piaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 5512Q lNCORPOAA7ED CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCiiITECTS 30d FIRST AVENUE NtJR?H 5U2TE 210 MINNEAP(JLTS, MN 55401 612•339�330Q RE: Highway 55 Corridor Study Dear Kevin: Attached yau will find a copy of the project schedule as stipulated by your letter dated March 18. This schedule is tentative and we welcome any suggestions or questions you may have as to its content. As you wili note, there are several meetings with the City (inciuding iwa which are joini �ouncii and Planning Cammission) which need to be scheduled. We have shown periods of severa! days ia a wesk �during which these meetings might occur. The exact dates of these meetings can be determir►ed as we proceed with ihe study. Please feel free Go cantact me with any questions or comments you have an this matter. We loak forward to worEcing with the City staff on this project. Sincerely, DAHL . REN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. } _ I .. jA ,� /% . �r`� / H ard Dahigren, President HD/akl ' Attachment: Project Scf�edule 0 -� 3�/�� Date � ;s�'g"�'�'�SE:,� -� ,Yd'�f i�;'�,.na�� .s�.� �Y'�� `'`� Pffe?� .w�. s;� ' ,'Gh�'.• _ ..c��i'e'"i �s ' -,':rb''ar��?? .�`^'-!�"�.«M . : �: ..c.. -.�� i:� rs� _ Y k __�t+e1t � _�`:.w.,.�+'� •h kJ. w8�wr. �;7i,.n:. •rs,.:.,....y-:t:. crti•r-� s , r:�.i'dl �+�:1 ��i.�w. n:.•. a�c.7 .z�..v .w.� y* �Td, ew+r.• , f�w'x..n.-,... p i.�' .�-.��,.�'•'y .-.� '.`*°.,.�.`�.Y'�'�.v,'' ,. . _ ._ . - . . , .,... ._. . a,t�' . �_. �_Z;,_ ..;.��':tF.. .r...�o.l�� .a��,'-..3q,.C. �.,J�'E);A-�?M1" . .�.,.n��:.: .. , �1'.ynw , �e: 14+..i�Ek,, v� �..� .. . . ..... ...... .: �.._._ " .,..wr.a��+......d>.. - . . '_ ._ _ .. . _. . . ''r`•�.` _ `tFix p:a...��,,: y —i I G H W�AY 5 5- TAssc . nnAR APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER ..ORRIDOR STUDY 4 5 1 2 3 1 3 4 1 2 4 1 4 1 ' 1 VIENDOTA HEIGHTS GATHERBASEINFORMATION MA CH 1 :VI I N�I E�S O T A ' PREPARE BASE MAP APRd 15 � MARCH 1987 CONSULTINC PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS i00 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 21(1 MINNEAPOLIS. MN i5i111 G12•339-i.1()(1 � W � Q a �ROJECT SCHEDULE �C SCHEDULED MEETINGS O MEEfWGS TO BE SCHEDULED MONTHLY REPORTS TO �OMMENCE W APRIL AND BE - ISSUED TO THE C[TY ON THE � � THIRD WEDNESDAY OF EACH G MONTH. � [ . . ,, .. _ . �� • . ._ .._ .... . ,,, �. .•- ,,,,,,,,,,,,,r,,,,,,,,. . - ,. .. ,,, „� . � „■,,,,,,,., ,,,,,,,. . .� . � . . ,,, „��,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,. ' �' ' ' ' ' ,,, ,,,,��,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,. . :�. . _ _ . � s�� aaaaaa��e�� II • • ,,, ,,, ,_--�,,,, ,�,,,,' ,,,, ...� _ .._ - � � �� -:�� i��o�1 �� -•� � � � • � �� _ :: . . ... _ . . �� v��0�� . _.�. . ., . . ,. - � �� - . ��nn�� " • ' ' • ,,, ,,, �,,,,,,,�� „",,,. � . . - �� i ��1�� . . . : . .■� -��-�-� '��n�. '�r�iiii�-�-��- �. � :. . . .. �� : . ._ , �� ' • ' ' ' ,,, ,,, �., „ .,.,.,��.,.�,. . , _ ... ��n��:�� : _ . . , - � - - - � - �� ._ .... . . ��u�s��_�u� CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS MEMO April 7, 1987 T0. Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Danielson �- Public Warks Director - SUB3ECT: Bid Rejectian Valleq Curve Estates Job No. $617 Improvement No..•-86, Project No. 5 Spring Creek Acres Jab No. 8703 Impravement No. $7, Praject Na. I DISCUSSION: Bids were opened on Friday, April 3, 1987, for the Spanjer/Swensan. developments. One bid was received as follows: Orfei ConCracting, inc. $1.69,642.10 � ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE _ $105,000.00 As you can see the bid is approximately 60% over esCimate. We rec- commend that it be rejected. There were five other plan�-holders who did not bid so we called them to see what the problem was. They infarmed us that there is amp2e work available for a11 cantractors and tha� this job was a messy (high. water table, deep digging) job with a shor� completion date. They pre- ferred not �o get in.volved with it. Three of them have now indicated that they will bid if we extend the completian date ta August 15th. RE CONIM,ENDATTON : Staff recommends that the project be rebid with a new comple�ion date of August 15, 1.987. ACTI4N REQUIRED: '� If Council desires Co implement the staff recommendation they should pass a mation adopting Resalution Na. $7- , RESOLUTZON REJECTING BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRES (IMPROVEMENT N0. 87, PROJECT NQ. 1} AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES (ZMPROVEMENT N0. $6, PR03ECT N0. �) and Resolution Nb. $7- , RESOLUTION AUTHQRIZING READVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPR4V�MENTS TQ SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRES {ZMFR4VEMENT N4. 87, PROJECT NQ. 1}, READVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VALLEY CURVE ESTATES (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 5). n 0 a City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLiJTION N0. 87 - RESOLUTION REJECTING B�DS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRES {IMPROVEMENT NQ, 87, PR4JECT N0. 1} AND VALLEY CURVE ESTATES - (IMPROVEMENT N0. 8b, PROJECT N0. S} WFIIEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the propased impravements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported R on the proposed costs of said improvements and canstruction-thereof, a nd WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the advertisement for bids on April 3, i987; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that the bid received from Orfei Contracting, Inc., in the �mount of $169,642.10, was 60% over the Engineer's estimate. • , NOW THEREFQRE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED bp the City Council of �he City of Mendota Heights, Minneso�a, as follows: 1. That the only bid received from Orfei Contracting, Inc. be rejected. Adopted by the City Council of the CiGy of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April, 1987. � ' - ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 0 � CITY COUNCIL C3TY OF MEIVI30TA I�EiGHTS By Charles E. Mer�ensotto, Mayar � � City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RFSOLUTION N0. 87 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING READVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRFS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 87, PROJECT N0. 1) WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements and ` construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and `� WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for s aid improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. WHEREAS, the City has previously advertised for bids and the bids received were considerably over•the Engineer's Estimate. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said improvements all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes, such bids to be received at the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights by 10:00 o'clock A.M., Monday, May 4, 1987, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Engineer will then - be tabulated, and wi�l then be considered by the City Council at its next regular Council meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of April, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk ' CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor , City af Mendota He�ghts Dakota County, Minnesota RFSOLUTIQN N0. 87 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING READVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS _ TO SERVE VALLEY CURVE ESTATES (IMPR4VEMENT N4. $6, PROJECT N0. 5) WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the praposed improvements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further regorted on the proposed costs of said improvernents and consCrucGion thereof; and _ WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications far said improvements and has presented such plans and speciiications to the City Council for approval. WHEREAS, the City has previously advertised for bids and the bids received were considerably over.the Engineer's Estirnate. NOW THEREFORE, ZT IS HER�Y RESOLVED by the City Council af the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: l. That the City Cierk with the aid and assistance af the City Engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed �a advertise f or bids for said �.mprovements all in accordance with �he applicable Minne�ota Statutes, such bids to be received at the Ci�.y Hall of the City of Mendata Heights by I0:04 o'cl.ack A.M., Monday, May 4, 1987, at which time they wi11 be publicly opened in the City � Council Chambers of the City Hall hy the City Engineer will then be tabulated, and will �hen be considered by �he City Council at its next regular Council meetirig. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendata Heights this 7th day of April, 1987. � ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY GOUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor , � � Page Na. 2406 March 17, 2987 CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS DAKOTA CQUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA - Minutes af the Regular Meeting � � Held Tuesday, March 17, 1987 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clack P.M. at City HaII., ?50 Sauth Plaza Drive, Mendota Heightsr Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotta called the meeting to arder at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The Pallowing members were present; Mayor Mertensatto, Coutncilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the agenda for the meeting, including items contained in the add-an agenda. Ayes: 5 Councilmember Witt sec�onded the motion. Nays: Q APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved approval af the minutes of the March 3rd meeting. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Cauncilrnember I3artmann xiaved appraval of the consent calendar as submitted and recammended for approval as part of the regular agenda, alang with authorizatian �'or execution o� all necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes af the February 11th Park Gominission meeting. b. Acknowledgment of the monthly Treasurer's report for February. c. Acknawledgment of the Fire Department monthly report far February. d. Adoption of Resolution Na. 87-25, "RESC7LUTION � APPQINTING SPECIAL ELECTION JUDGES." e. Approval of a request from the City Engineer ta reduce the frequency o� the Engineer's Report to a guarterly basis during the off-seasan but on a monthly basis during �he constructian season. f. Approval of the List of Claims dated March 17, 298'7 and total].ing $613,710.84. Page No. 2407 March 17, 1987 g. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated March 17, 1987 and attached hereto. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ANIMAL HOSPITAL Dr. Tom Koepke was present to rec�uest approval of FENCE PERMIT the installation of a six foot high fence to replace an existing three foot fence at the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital site. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he believes the standard kennel fence height is five feet and felt that the proposed fence should be reduced to five feet. After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the issuance of a permit for a six foot high fence for an animal exercise area at 1938 Dodd Road. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 STREET SWEEPING On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, CounciZmember Cummins moved that the contract for 1987 street sweeping be awarded to Knutson Clean ' - � Sweep for their low bid of $46.00 per hour. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 IOS ASSESSMENT Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution ROLL No. 87-26, "RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR I.O.S. PLAZA ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 82, PROJECT NO. $� �u Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-27, "RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR I.O.S. PLAZA ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREA IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, , PROJECT NO. 7)," the hearing to be held on April 21st. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 STOP SIGNS Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Ordinance No. 230, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1113," to add Medora Road, north and south bound, at . Page No. 2408 March 37, 1987 Emerson Avenue as stop streets and Knoliwood Lan�, north and south bound, at Emerson as stop streets, and to delete the yield street designation for Medora Road north and south bound at Emer�on - Avenue, Cauncilmember Blesener seconded the motian. Ayes: 5 Nays: Q SPRING CREEK Councilmember Cummins moved adaption af Resolutian ACRES No. 87-28, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT," for the Spring Creek Acres additian al.ong with authorization �'or executian o�' the developer�s agreement by the Mayor and City Administrator. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PERSONNEL Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays; a The Cauncil acknowledged and discussed a mema fram the Public Works Director recommending the appointment of a temparary Code Enfarcement Intern. Mayar Mertensotta expressed concern over �otential City liability for workers campensation since the candidate, Richarsi Gill, has had a recent back injury. He felt that the City shauld require some type of liability waiver. Administra�.or Frazell explained that the candidate is registered with the second injury fund under'workers campensat�an and there should be no liability question. After discussion, Gouncilmember Witt moved to appoint Richard Gill as 1987 Code Enfarcement intern effective March 18th at the rate af $8.5� per hour, and to increase the Code Enforcement budget for the position by $6,OQ0. Councilmember Hartmann secanded the mation. On �he recommendation af the Public Works Directar Counci].member Blesener maved that Gregg Gund be hired a� a t�emparary, �'uII-time engineering technician at the rate of $8.50 and that staff be directed to prepare an employment agreenzent specifying �Ghe terms of employment, including the length of'employ;nent being 8 months, benefits as recammended in the Public Works Director'� memo, and a waiver of rights to unemployment compensatic�n . . Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged and di.scussed a mema fram the City Clerk recommending that the secretarial Page No. 2409 March 17, 1987 pasition, budgeted ta begin mid-year, be created effective on April 15th and that a new receptionist be hired effective on April 20th. Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize creat�on of an administrative secretary pasitic;n, effective April 15th, to be placed at Step D of Grade V of the pay matri� and that Kimberlee Blaeser be p�omoted to the positian, and that staff be authorized to advertise for and select a Receptionist/Clerk Typist to cammence wark on April 20th at 5tep A, Grade I of the pay matrix. Councilmember Blesener �ecanded the motion. � Ayes: 5 Nays; 0 TH 55 CORRIDaR The Council discussed a praposal fram Dahlgren, STUDY �hardlow & Uban for preparation of a comprehensive study af the Highway 55 corridor area. Cauncilmember Blesener moved to approve executian of the praposed contract conditioned upon submission af a time schedule �or completion of the wark and an the basis that the cansultants submit _ monthly progres� reports ta Council. Councilmember Hartmann secanded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 - ,. LABOR AGREEMENT The Council discussed a memo from the City Administrator relative to the proposed 1987 police bargaining unit contract. There was Some discussion over comparable worth implications. Counci3member Cummins stated that he abjects to pattern bargaini.ng and sugc�ested that perhaps the City shauld go to arbitrat�.on since the comparable � warth study has shawn that many of the positians are overcompensated. After discussion, Counciimember Blesener moved to approve the 198'7 Polic� Bargaining Unit Contract as recommended by the City Administrator. _ Councilmember Hartmann seconded the mofion. Ayes: 5 Naysz 0 EASEMENT Public Works Director Danielsan revieweci his memo CONDEMNATION recammending that the City Attorney be authoriz� to enter eminent domain proceedings to acquire utility and trail easements over twa lots in the Eide Addition. It was noted by Attorney Hart that the property awner is signa.ficantly delinquent in the payment of the park contribution due as part of the platting of Eide Estates. He �uggested that �he Page No. 2410 March 2?, I987 City cou3d exercise the right of eminent domain and apply the park contribution delinquency against the cost o� the easements if other negotiatian fails, � _ or the City could commence action on collection af , the delinquency. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Witt moved to authorize payment of $1�,QQ0 for the necessary utility and trailway easements as recomm�nded, or if the o�fer is unacceptable, to direct the City Attorney to proceed with condemnatian of the easement, the cost of easement acquisition to be of�set by the delinquent park contribution and outstanding interest. Councilmember Hartmann secanded the motion. Councilmember Hartmann moved to authorize the City Attorney, to cammence action ta recover the delinquent Eide Additian park contribution and outstanding interest if there is no favorable reaction to easement negotiations. Councilrnember Cummins seconded the motion. � MEETING CHANGE To avoid conflict over use of the Council Chambers for the pracessing af the Special Park Election, Council�ember Hartmann moved that the Aprii 21st regular mee�ing be resaheduled to April 22nd at 7.3Q P.M. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 REFERENDUM TH I3/VICTQRIA ADJOURN Councilmember Witt secanded the mation. The Cauncil directed the City Administrator to drait a Counci2 letter af support far the Park Ref�rendum. Councilmember Gummins directed the Administrator to be sure that there is cammunity identity in the athletic complex name. Councilmember Witt suggested that there be a question and an�wer page, or flyer insert, in the newsletter or in the local paper�. Administrator Frazell was directed to explore available options far da.st�ibution of a question and an�wer sheet. The Cauncil acknowl.edc�ed a report from the Public Works Director regarding a Mn/DOT/County agreement over relocation of the Victoria/13 intersection. There being no further busines� to come before the Counci3, Caunciimember Hartmann moved that the Page No. 2411 March 17, 1987 meeting be adjourned to a closed session for discussion of the 1987 Public Works labor agreement. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 - TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: C ar es E. Mer enso 0 Mayor e 0 � � Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk 0 0 i LIST 4F CONTRAGTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 17, 2987 Excavating License: ------------------- Bruhn Excavatinc� S.J. Dahn Trucking and Excavating Junek Excavating �- Rumpca Sewer and Water Saint Paul Utilities and Excavating Shamrack Excavatiang Gompany Gas Piping License: ------------------- E.S.P., Inc. Farmer's Heating & Coo].ing Snelling Company General Contractor"s License: ----------------------------_ Artisan Construction %3BS Constructian,^.Inc, Capper Ridc�e Iiomes, Inc. Fieaver Design and Construction, Inc. M.J. Moser Construction ' P1.ane�man Canstruction Cc�mpany _ Quality Exteriars, Inc. D.A. Smith Builder�, Inc. Heating and Air Canditioning License: ------------------------------------- E.S.P., Inc. Snelling Campan�r Masonry License: ________________ Jesca, Inc. R M.W. Concrete & Mas s , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MARCH 24, 198� PLANNING COMMISSIaN MINUTES - The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Morson at 7:30 o'clock P.M.Y The �ollowing members were present: Morsan, Henning, Andersan, Kreb�bach, and Burke. Duggan and McMonigal had natified the Cammission that they would be absent. Alsa present were Planning Cansultant Howard Dahlgren and Public Works Director Jim Danielson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MISCELLANEOUS Commissioner Burke maved approval of the January 22 minutes as submitted previously, Commissioner Henning secanded the motion. Commissioner Henning moved approval February 24 mi.nutes as submitted. Cammissioner Anderson secanded the of the motian. City Administrator gave a shart slide show presentation on the parks band referendum. iiEARING, ZONING Chairman Marson called the meeting to order ORDZNANCE AMENDMENT for th� purpose o£ a public hearing to KENNELING IN B-2 consider an amendment to �rdinance 401, DISTRICT Section 13.2(6}, which would allow kennel.ing of small animals in an animal hospital located in a B-2 zone. No one was present for the hearing and staff advised,that Dr. Koepke, af the Mendata Heights Animal Hospital, presently has 16 indoor'runs nowl with no plans ta expand thern. Chairman Morsan wondered if Dr. Koepke's original conditional use permit could ba amended, rather than amend the Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Burke felt the amendment should state ...,"and which includes kenneling". Commissioner Burke moved to recommeizd approval af amending Ordinance No. 401, Section 13.2(6} to read: Animal Hospi.tal (Veterinary Clinic). As used hereinunder the term '"Animal Hospital" or "Veterinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility for the diagno�is, treatment and � medical. care of smail animals, in which aII prafessional services are conduc�.ed within an enclosed building and which incZudes the _, -2- Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES kennelinQ of such animals. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Anderson suggested granting a variance to the original conditional use permit. Planner Dahlgren stated that changes in land uses can not be handled by a variance, only by a conditional use permit. There being no questions or comments from the audience, Commissioner Krebsbach moved to close the public hearing at 7:59 P.M. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion. Commissioner Henning suggested that Commissioner Burke bring his original motion back to the floor, where he felt he could now second the motion. Commissioner Burke moved to recommend approval of his original motion to amend Section 13.2(6), as stated previously. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 - Nays : "0 HEARING, ZONING Chairman Morson called the hearing to order ORDINANCE AMENDMENT for the purpose of considering an amendment to AIRCRAFT NOISE the Zoning Ordinance to allow for aircraft ATTENUATION noise attenuation in certain zones of the City. City Administrator Frazell gave a brief background presentation and two persons were present for the hearing. Administrator Frazell noted that there would be definite increased costs to builders/homeowners in implementing this proposed ordinance and it would also amend the existing building code. Mr. Larry Shaughnessy, former Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council representative, explained how the noise zone lines were designed, noting that they were designed almost by compromise. Most of the southern portion of the City is designated as being in one of four aircraft noise zones. As part of the discussion, Commissioner Henning stated he could not support the -2- Ayes: Nay�: Aye�: Nays: RECESS � � MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMTSSION MINUTES ordinance until the airport directs and contrals air traf�ic more expeditiously. He felt that the Metropolitan Council needs to go to the FAA and ask their cooperation, since � Mendota Heights ha no clout with the FAA. Chairman Morsan asked for questions or comments �rom the audience. � Mr. Richard Putnam, from Tandem Corparation, stated that with better insulation meth�ds, th� 494 freeway noise would be shut down, since he �elt the freewa� noise was more objectionable than th� aircraft noise. Mrs. Gelia Kennedy, disagreed'with Mr. felt the air noise freeway naise. 2367 Delaware Avenue, Putnam, s�ating that she is much worse than the Mr. Merril Biel, 2363 Delaware agreed that the air traffic noise is worse than the 494 traffic. Planner Dahl�ren felt that i� the City adopts the model nozse ordinance now, it could be on the condition that flight� stay in the proper corridor, � y There being na further questions Cammissioner Burke maved ta c3.ose hearing at 8:40 P.M. Commissioner Henning seconded the or comments, the public motion, Commissioner Krebsbach askect what th� benefits would be to the residents if the proposed ordinance is adopted. Af�er further discussion, Commissioner Henning moved ta recammend adoption of the praposed model noise ordinance and urged that the City Council strongly suggest that the MAC, FAA, and Metropolitan Cauncil raake use af the noise corridors as delineated an the map and that they utilize the Highway 55 corridar, and that air traffic not be directed to bec�in their turns within any of the contaur line�. Commissioner Burke secc�nded the niotion. Chairman Morson called for a recess at 8:45 P.M. , -3- MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES HEARINGS, CASE NO. 87-03 and 87-04, COPPERFIELD III, & KING PROPERTY The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 P.M. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order for the purpose of a public hearing to consider a rezoning and subdivision proposal for Copperfield III and the King property in the southeast area of the City. Mr. Richard Putnam, Tandem Corporation, and Mr. Steve Ryan, Lyman Lumber, were present to explain the proposals. Mr. Putnam noted that Copperfield Phase III corresponds to air zone IV. He also noted that all the lots in Phases I and II are sold. He explained the various concerns with the pond drainage, and the high water marks that were established by the Department of Natural Resources on some of the ponds. He stated that all the properties can be served by sewer all the way to 494. He further advised the Commission that there may be eight lots requiring a wetlands permit, but it is uncertain at this time. Mr. Putnam then went on to explain the King property proposal, to be known as Hampshire Estates, which would be a single family development with 15,000 square foot lot sizes. He noted that 6 1/2 acres of the property is right-of-way for Mendota Heights Road. In this proposal, there may be five lots needing a wetlands permit and the DNR may need to grant a fill permit for the area near the park area contribution, but he was not sure if the DNR would grant the fill permit. He said if the fill permit is not granted, the park area would be reduced to about 1/2 the size of a football field, rather than a full size field. There would be protective covenants nearly the same as in the Copperfi�ld phases, but the home prices would be slightly less, ranging from $140 to $200/$210,000. Copperfield home prices range from $200-$300,000. Planner Dahlgren suggested a continuation of th� public hearing to the April 28 meeting to determine the area of park dedication and other concerns. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to continue the public hearin� for both applications to the April 28 meeting at 7:30 P.M. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion. -4- MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES � Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. A lady asked if all the pipes would be underground and if the water would drain counter clockwise. A�entlemen asked if the placeme�t of Mendota Heights Road was fixed yet and if so, was this causing the crowding of the park area. Dr. Ted Owens noted that the Mendota Heights Road placement originated with the McNulty proposal some years ago. Mr. Rich Gabriel, 670 Apache Lane asked if a fill permit from the DNR had been applied for yet and stated that he felt the residents need more park area. There being no further discussion, a vote was taken on the motion on the floor to continue the public hearing to April 28, at 7:30 P.M. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING, CASE NO. Chairman Morson called the hearing to order - 87-05, ANDERSON, for the purpose of a public hearing to SUBDIVISION consider an application from Carl Anderson for the subdivision of property located in the vicinity of First Avenue and Vandal. Mr. Anderson stated he proposes 17 single family lots and that he would like to extend Brookside Lane to Laura, then to First Avenue. Lot prices would range from $30-$50,000, with protective covenants similar to those in the Ivy Falls area. Chairman Morson expressed concern with the isolated lots that would be landlocked in the proposed plat. Planner Dahlgren noted that the proposed plat conforms to all ordinance requirements, but that problems may arise with the surrounding property owners. Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. Mr. Joseph Bird, 676 Laura Court, felt it -5- MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES would be impossible to develop the property without disturbing other properties. He noted that he has 165 feet alon� Emerson and he �--"�- ,. objects because the area is all peat and unbuildable. Mr. Anderson noted that Twin City Testing's soil borings indicate that the area is buildable. Mr. Bird objected to the use of the drainage ditch in his property. Mr. Ray Burrows, 668-1st Avenue expressed concern with the drainage south of First Avenue. He asked if the platting changed the utilities planned previously for the area. He also expressed concern with access for emergency vehicles. ' Mrs. Joan Robinson, 1375 Laura, noted that Laura Street only has 18 feet of driving area, and Brookside will have 30 feet of driving area. Mr. Pat Hickey, 1334 Sylvandale Road, asked where Clement, Emerson, and Sylvandale meet and if the woods would be wiped out. He expressed concern for the property values in the area. Mrs. Blum, 669-1st Avenue asked if there would be.any access for their back lot in the event they wish to sell in the future. Mr. Vince Becker, 694-1st Avenue asked what the rational was for developing the road system, instead of extending Vandal northerly. Mr. Ralph Hussner, 654-1st Avenue noted that ISD #197 is interested in selling their _ _ 4 1/2 acre property for development. Mr. Ray Christensen, 1356 Clement, noted that he has no idea of selling the back portion of his lot and expressed a desire to kee� the wooded land. Mr. Ray Burrows felt there is a need for a back access to the Somerset School property and asked if a footbridge could be considered. Commissioner Henning moved to continue the public hearing to April 28, at 8:00 P.M., to,.._ � MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES allow time for the developer to work with the neighbors on their concerns. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion Ayes : 5 - ---- - Nays: 0 One of the residents ex�ressed concern with excessive speeding on First Avenue and Public Works Director Daniel�son noted that he would advise the Police Department of the problem. CASE NO. 87-01, Mr. Keith Schweiger was present to request a SCHWEIGER, VARIANCE 2.7 foot setback variance to allow construction of a 12' x 12' three season porch at 2291 Ocala Court. He noted that originally the porch fit on the lot, but his architect suggested tipping the house location to line up with the neighbor's garage on the Court. He had written approval from his adjacent neighbors for his proposal. Commissioner approval of � construction as requested. Commissioner Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Henning moved to recommend 2.7 foot variance to allow of a 12' x 12' three season porch Anderson seconded the motion. CASE NO. 87-06, Mr. Ed Adrian, 1549 Dodd Road, was present to ADRIAN, VARIANCE request approval of a 30 foot front yard setback variance on 4th Avenue to allow construction of an 8' x 20' screen porch to the back of his existing family room, which is constructed right on the property line at a zero foot setback. There was also some question as to whether a wetlands permit needed consideration, but it was determined that the wetlands area did not extend to his structure. Commissioner Henning moved to recommend approval• of a 30 foot front yard setback variance to continue the existing setback which is zero on 4th Avenue. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 87-07, Mr. Jim Kilburg was presen.t to request a KILBURG, VARIANCE variance to allow construction,of a new home -7- e MARCH 24, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES at 819 Cheri Lane. The variance is to save a black walnut tree in the back yard and he had written permission from his adjacent neighbors -�--- to place his home approximately 20 feet ahead of the other homes on Cheri Lane. He noted that if a 20 foot variance to the established setback were granted, his home would be about �- 20-25 feet away from the walnut tree. After further discussion, Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend that a front yard setback variance be granted in this case of 12 feet to move the setback from 72 feet to 60 feet as requested. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 � ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Commissioner Burke moved that the meeting be adjourned. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:06 o'Clock P.M. -8- , r�crio �A�E�: March 27, i987 r �TO: tiayar, City Council and City Admin ��b� G; � FROAi: Paul R. Berg " � Code Enforcement Officer SllBJECT: Buildirtg Activity Report far hlarCh, 1987 CURRENT MONTii� YEAR TO DA�E - 1937 i N0. VALUAT70N FEE COLLCCTED NQ. VALUATION BLbG PERMIfiS � sF� 12 1,876,$32.51 16,600,67 29 4,300,�175.12 apT o 0 o a o CII 4 1,101,653.56 7,6I4.04 I6 2,6$2,503.56 I�fISC. 13 gl 25 SUB TOTAL 29 3,070,133.57 25,905.99 70 7,168,880.10 iRQ PERMITS . plbg I4 363.00 38 Wtr 13 55.QQ 34 Swr 10 I75.00 22 tits, Ac � & Gas Pipel 51 SUB TOTAL 48 � 1,347.00 145 LICENSING Cantractor's Licenses 53 1,325.00 229 i YEAR TQ DATE - 1986 FE� COLL�CTED N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED 35,02#i.27 9 I,105,519.35 7,300.44 p 4 0 0 18'3��4. � 15 17$'�35:71 �' . 56,336.17 28 1,698,755.06 11,812.53 369.00 50.00 122.50 2,077.50 � TOTAL 13Q $3,070,133.57 $28,577,99 444 $7,168,880,10 $69,882,67 262 $1,698,755,06 $18,090.03 NO'TE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and SCate Surcharge. Amaunts shawn wil.l reflect only permit, glan check fee and valuatior► amounts. ❑ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TRESURER'S REPORT, MARCH, i987 DAKC3TA COUNTY STATE BANK � Checki.ng Account $216,490.02 Savings Account 428.42 Savings Cert, 9-24-87 @ 5.55% 25,000.00 $191,518.43 Col.lateral - Bond� 200,OOQ.00 Gov't. Guar. 125,000.00 CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 5-4-87 @ 5.75% $425,000.00 Savings Cert. 8-87 @ 5.41% 13,952.59 $438,952.59 Co2lateral - Bands 2,300,000.00 Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 U.S. TREASURY BZLLS Due 5-24-8? 800,00t} 775,59b.4� 7-30-87 740,Q00 489,667.77 $1,461,237.27 GOV'T, SECURITTES FtTND, 1.d.7� 1,200,400.4f} TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,291,708.29 , � COLLATERAL 325,OQ0.00 1,400,000.00 tl`�t�NES01.4 �O y4 � � �- � 5 0 �� aF TRA� � Minnesota Departrrxent of Transportatian District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North (3akdale, Minnesata. 551{�9 March 12, 2987 r Mr. James Danielson Public Works Directar 750 South P2aza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesata Dear Mr. Daniel.son: a 5512Q SIIBJECT: S.P. 1986-2b I-494 North and South Ramps at CSAii 31{Fi�.at Knob Rd, } in Eagan and Mendata Heights Dako�a Caunty Tra£fic Signal Installations Telephone 779-II7$ We have a project scheduled for let�ing i.n June of 1987, that wi.21 insta2i permanent traffic signal systems at the I-494 North and South Ramps at Pilot Knab Raad intersections. _ We will request federal funds for t'�e canstruc-�ion cast "and, if appraved, �he State wi].l assume the Cota1 non-federal share. We propose that the maintenanee of these signal systems be shared as follows: - Dalcata County will be responsible for cleaning, painting, re7.amping and ane-half of the monthly energy costs for bath signa2 systerns. - The Ci�y of Eagan wi12 be responsibie for orte-half of the mart�hly energy costs at the South Ramps intersection. - The City of Mendota Heights will be responsible £or ane-half of the monthly energy casts at the North Ramps intersection. - The StaCe will provide a11 other maintenance, � Please cantac� either Ms. Mary LaPlante or Mr. Bruce Kastner if you have any questi.ons or coaQnents regarding this traffic signal project: rely, ' �,Kermit K. McRae, P. , District Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer � E LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL QN APRIL 7, 198'7 Excavating License: 2987 Rubbish iiaul.er License�: ------------------- +---------_____----------______ � � . JMS Contracting, Inc. � Action Disposa]. System, Inc. Glenn Rehbea.n Excavating, Inc. � Mendo'ta Hts. Rubbi�h Service Raseville Plumbing and Heating - ( Paor Richard's, Inc. Ryan Plumbing and Heating � Tom Thumb Food Markets Sauve and Parenteau Sewer and Water � Valley-Rich Company, Inc. � General Contractar's License: ------------------------------- Boschee Homes, Inc. ( Crawford-Merz Construction Company � Custom Pool.s, Ir�c, ( Hayes Contractars, Inc. � Industrial Sprinkler Carparation � Midwestern Mechanical Minar Construction Narth Star Services Nu-Home Construction = Providence Builders Corporation Jim 5tevens Construction, Inc. Twin Ci�y Fireplace Company - . Masonry License: . ---------------- E.M. Kjeseth Ma�onry Canstruction, Inc, Sta-Lar Masonry Twin Cities Concrete Systems 1987 Cigarette License� to be Approved by Council ------------------------------------------------- Country Club Market, Inc. Fischer's Tawing Par 3 Golf, Inc. SdS Convenzent Mart Tempco Manufacturing ., Texaco Tom Thumb Food Markets � a �� f I CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 2, 19$7 T0: Mayor, City Council and City �i�.�or FROM; Tom Olund Public Works Superintenden� _ SUBJECT: Bid Award For: Equipment Contract No. 1- Cab & Chassis Equipment Contract No. 2- Dump Body and Appurtenances nzscusszorr • Bids were received on March 24, 1987 for �wo equipment contracts, one ior dump truck cab and chassis, and one f ar dump body, sander, plow and wing. We had three companies bid Che cab and chassist Narth Star Internata.onal Alternate '86 demo w/ box and sander Truck Bid �' $37,996.00 $43,232.00 Alternate Trade-In $3,500.00 $3,5Q0.00 To ta.l $34,496.Q0 �39. 732 . 00�. Lakeland Fard $38,083»00 $2,500.00 $35,5$3.Q0 Boyer Ford $38,950.04 $4,400.00 $34,550.04 The deduct was for our 1970 Internatianal dump trucic. Basis of award was on the straight trucic bid price. North Sta.r In�.ernational was low bidder bath ways. We had three comganies bid the plaw, wing, sander and dump body: MacQueen A. $22,413,00 B. $22,32b.00 , Crysteel _ $23,333.00 Boyum $26,637.OQ Included in the specification forms was a garagraph (see attached) ta protect us from buying a piece af equipment that we didn`t consider an approved equal. MacQueen equipment did nat show us any of their equipment until Thursday, AprzZ 2nd {and then only a wing) which was well after the �. bzd opening. � � h �he plows they are proposing are relatively new ta the area and they did nat have any references. Wha� we saw of the wing and its mounting components we were not completely satisfied with. We didn't feel the wing post should be fully welded. In the �vent of any damage it could not be regaired, it wonld have ta be replaced as a whole unit, others use a balted design. The wing past is something we have had problems with on our present wings. A1so the materia� used for the cutting �dge reinforcement does not meet our specificatians in size and thzckness. _ The sander does not have an adjustable spinner guard, it does not have a single contral lever far easy apening access to auger. The auger bearing mounts use anly 2 ba1�s. The only difference in Alternate B was the front glow, and it was an 11 foat plow. It also did nat have a reversing worm gear. Crysteel only shawed us plaws, the other equipment was not shown, They did nat bid a Polymar mold baard, instead they bid steel with a special sprayed on non-stick coating. The front plow does not have a reversing worm gear. The box understructure design is not the preferred type. In order to meet specifications, material would need to be added, therefore increasing the weight af the unit. Cysteel's sander does not meet th� specifications in the same regards as MacQueens. -= s The past experience with the plows and wings we have now has not been good. We have repaired and- replaced zXumerous pa�ts which means down time during snow plowing, plus the dolZar figure for parts and labar has been high. In.order to staq clear of these problems again, we wrote our specifica- tions arounci a Frink. plow and wing which we feel is the hest available, We have talked to other municipalities that have been using Frink plows, and have had very positive responses. I feel the extra cost initially wil�. be mare than made up in Iess� maintenance costs over the course of many years of owning the truck (remember the�truck we are trading is 17 years old). RECOMMENDATION• Although there were two lower equipment bids our analysis shows they did not meet the specifications. Therefore I recommend we award the bid to Boyum Equ,ipment for plow, wing and sander. Boyum Equipment carries the Frink line of pl.ows and meets specifications on all other equipment. Award bid ta North Star International for cab and chassis. ACTION REQUIR�.'} • If Council cancurs with the staff recommendation they should pass a mation authorizing the purchase of the plow, wing and sander from Boyum Equipment in the amount of $26,637 and the purchase of cab and chassis from Narth Star International in the amount of $34,49b. .-. B. aUALSFIGATIQIV OF BIDDEi�S/APPROVED EOUAL Ta gain cansideration as an "appraved equal"", the prospective bidder must make available to the City for its use the sar�e model of the piece of equipment it inter►ds to bid as an "approved equal". This equipment shall be furnished at least five (5) working days prior to the openir�g date of bitis. A piece of equipme»t tnust be avail- able for demonstratian by the City during that_period 5o the City can evaluate its performance. Zn additian, the pro�pective bidder�shall furnish a list of cities in the State of Minnesota, preferably in ihe seven county metropalitan area who are currently'operating the model of rnachine intended ta be considered as an "approved - equal". Follawing the �^eview of the unit ar�d the i�farmation furnished, the Gity will notify the prospeciive supplier of an "approved equal" unit whether or not it wili be accepted for hiddirtg and whether or na� zt meets speci�icatians. This notification shall be given at least two (2) days prior to the opening �of bids. - ,. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �f7 April 2, 1987 TQ: Mayor, City Council and Cit fl�'�L�ator . � � FROM: James E. Danielsan Public Works Director" SITBJECT: �ewers, Water, Streets Feasibility Hearing Stratford Woods Job No. 8626 Impravement No. 86, Project No. 13 DISCUSSI4N• S�aff completed a feasibility study in Ma.rch ac3dressing Mr. Terrp Dabie's Stratford Woods subdivision (report attached}. Because there is one oCher piece of property that wil1. benefit from this cons�ruction that the develaper could not speak for, a public hearing needs to be conducted. That oCher 1.and is owned by Mrs. Angeline.McDonald (Street Foreman Lenny Kanitz's mother). Staff understood that Mr. Dabie had been keeping Mrs. McDanald informed of the process and that she was in favor of it (she had not been attending the previous hearings?. �After she received the formal notice oi the hearing, she delivered th�e attachecP Ietter ta City Hall abjecting to the assessments. When she delivered the l.etter she stated that Mr. Dobie had led her ta believe that he would be paying far all the assessments. I called Mr. Dobie to confirm this and he told me that he meant to tell her that he wouZd gay far aIl the surveying costs, Mrs. McDonald's land is large enough �o be subdivided i.n�a 1 or 2 new Iats sa assessments shouZd be established for at least one new lot. Those assessments could then be def erred so that she wauld have no zmmediate costs, anlq if she subdivided or sold her property. RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends that assessments be established for ane 1ot far the McDonal.d's property and that those assessments be set at the same rate as Z�rhat ane lot in the Dobie subdivision is paying. We also recommend that those assessments then be deferred until such time as the lot is subdivided or the land is sold. Staff further recommends that the required public hearing be conducted but that na action be taken tQ order the project or that plans and specifica�Gion be prepared until such time as the Developer's Agreem�nt i� signed and the final plat prepared. Mr. Dobze says it will be another 3-4 weeks before that is done. e ACTION REQUIRED• Council needs to conduct the required public hearing and then if they des�ire to implement the staff recammendation, they will take no action until the Developer's Agreement is signed and final plat is approved. 1 e � � 0 � o � � � March 25, 19$7 The Honorable Mayor and City Gauncil of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MI3 55120 ATTENTION: City Clerk RE; NQTICE OF HEAP.Il�G OI� PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 7.45 P.N,. A�ri2 7, 19$7 Please be advised that the undersi�,ned, a property owner being assessed under the praposed.assessment for Canstruction of Sar�itary Sewers, L7atermai.n, Storm Sewers and Street Improvements {Impravement No. 86, Proje-�t No. 13,�, hereb3r objects to said proposed assessments. The basis for said objection is that said proposed assessments as Ghey affect the real property awned by me are arbitrary, capr3.ciaus, unreasonable and exceed any value ta my property pursuant to the improvements proposed to be made. /. ...� � r /f. �Sir`%. /� � _ -,-_ - - - 1. . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 25, 1987 TO: Mayor, City Council and C3ty A ir�� ator / / FROM: Kla�ton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Stratford Woods Job No. 8626 Improvement No. INTRODUCTION Streets �86, Project No. 13 The purpose of this report is to determine the costs necessary to serve the Stratford Woods subdivision with sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and streets. The Subdivision consists of 13 new single family lots. The averac�e lot size is approximately 21,000 square feet in area. In addition to the 13 lots in the subdivision, a 1.4 acre parcel owned by Angeline McDonald will also be served. On the �lat this parcel is shown as an exception. The following is a detailed discussion of the costs associated with each of the utilities, �ollowed by an examination of the method of assessing the costs. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer will be installed to serve all 13 lots and the McDonald lot to the south. The only feasible method of serving the lots is by extending the sanitary sewer at the end of Stratford Road. Approximately 850 feet of sanitary main will be required. The cost to install the sewer main, services, and appurtenances, will be about $49,260, including overhead, fees, and contingencies. Watermain must also be installed to serve the subdivision. There are existing watermains atthe end of Stratford Road, and along ,Victoria Road, and a watermain to serve this development will connect up to both to form a loop. The cost of installing a watermain system to serve the development as shown on the attached plan, will be approximately $48,270, including overhead, fees and contingencies. Due to the existinc� terrain features, an extensive storm water drainage system will not be required. It will only be necessary to install several catch basins in the street, and storm pipes to carry the water north to the existing holding pond. An easement from the narth edge of the deve3apment to the edge af the holding pond will be rec�uired for this storm sewer pipe. The total cast of canstructzng the stozm sewer as shawn on the attached plan will be approximately $25,410. _ In order to pravide access to the development, a through street and cul-de-sac will be constrt�cted as shown on the attached drawing. The streets will be standard design, 33' wide with concrete curb and gutter and a 6Q' right o� way. The position of rthe street allows for future develapment of the McDonald lot at the south east corner oE the subdivisian. The total cost of street construction wiZl be appraximately $69,370. CONSTRUCTION COST SUMM.ARY ITEM ' COST Sanitary Sewer $49,260 Watermain $48,270 Storm Sewer $25,410 Street $69,370 TOTAL $192,310 ASSESSMENTS The entire`�ost of construc�ing the utilities for this development w3ll be assessed against the Subdivision and against the McDonald lot. Standard assessment procedures (total front footage and area) will be u�ed for dividing the as�es�ments among the Strat�ord Waods subdivi�ion and the McDonald property. Based an the calculated front footage, the per �ront foot cost will be $27.21 for sanitary sewer, $26.56 �or watermainf $32.92 for streets. The cost af the storm sew�r, based on the total square �ootage, will be $0.0755 per square foot. The following is a table of the Total assessments; PARCEL Stratford Woods McDonaid Property TQTAL ASSESSMENT $165,820 $25,490 $192,31Q + PER LClT ASSESSMENT $12,830_* 13�lots divide into 2 or 3 In additian ta the above assess�ents, there are deferred assessments already on the Stratford Woods parcel. The total amount due on the deferred assessments is about $9,000 in principle, and $9,�0o in interest. The developer has requested that the these deferred assessments be spread out evenly against the 13 new lots. xowever, City policy stipulates that the total back charges of interest be paid at tha time of replatting, and that all deferred assessments be paid, except for the amaunt that would be the balance i� there hadn"t been a deferment. Thus, the City can spread the final three years of the assessments, which have been deferred for 26 years, but this amounts to only about $1,5Q4. - - RECOMMENDATZON . . - Based on the informatian contained in this report and the attached drawings, it appears that it is feasible and desirable to serve the Stratford Woods Subdivision and surrounding areas with public utilities in the manner shown on the attached drawing�, and Staff recammends Council to arder a public hearing far the project. Staff recommends the public utilities be funded 1004 by assessments, and these assessments be computed based on the frant footage served. ACTION REQUIRED If Council wishes ta implement the staff's recommendation they should pass a mation adopting Resalution No. 87- , RESOLUTIQN ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPQRT AND CALLING FOR HEARING �N PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STQRM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE STRATFORD WOODS AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. $6, PROJECT NO. 23). � _ ..�, ,. .v � Q,,� ., � �E � _ -_ � '� W. �� i E�GLE � re /�� , '� . P�,.r �� ' 3 �: - Z J' ��\ , /; B U R 0 W ' /h/T - � � � ; _ ' " _ I I � . • . :f '_ � !.i\ �:i • I , � � L r Z � � ,�� - ' �� . Q --1 � � i, _ ` �✓' l� . POND • I � N � �-�. 19 _� � - :, � E �p� • I � I ' � , Zj �� , \\` A �'' - i � ,3_ ' � '� __ :;/ _ !� � _ : � E , . . � 14� Cq r�'S rZ�6-� Z�_ > Q� .. I � �. i � I ---� _••J �'Z 9 � �i � 4, , ' l - I - .�;%�'\ `��,a I � C� PL .LE � If�1^.E C � �i� •P S7FZATFJn^G ROq 4�s� I � � � �y,� 2 \ � E ! � U a - - -- I D \ W" ``to � �� L : T � ' ' ��. � �5 -i J ; _ � I � :-. J /4 `',� ._A � � Qo,� :��r��<� � � .a� �1� i' � Z COtCECT i0 ESISiING SANITMT � � , � , � \ _ � � � ,G Fi 0 0 L � �,� � ' QQ 3 � �Gj� � 1O • ---' + Q ' �D � � \ •,i'\ , - � � = q � ,�{\ 3 + 3 6 F `� � �• 16 , ,y 'r , � 1 � J � _ i _ •t. },�P � t � -- ; L� i: \ � I O� — —�\ � � s � ' I � r'' ��a r �•�, ._,— — —�— � i 4 Y' ` � �,�� ' R S i �� y,., � G� P R 0 A ' � _- � . '� 4 � OUTlOT 0 �� `J E i :; ��.. i 3.• a R . • � � '`� , ._ + ; Q � s�,o`� � tycoo�i�� n� � ?L 3 12 `� Z `'a D � ' � ourwr • L D. DuPONT a. 7 � iDITION � ;;••.. 5 i. .. 4 ..... ---•-• 3-•- • � _ ...Y � ' - - � . _ .. I � , : ��- • : . � 2 � �i 1 � �' �y l ..rJ -- - - ' � � ' �'� � 1 �� - - r- - W =--- � I , , )RIA COURT Q r-- K AY AV E� J r.__, % 8- �� j� . L�� _� L.�tr i 1 - I � ''� � . 1 ... � � � � b 9 —1._ _ � ` a 3 .�� . . 12 z _ �• t l �. � , ie �N �t c�° P Q 1 N T . , � �- � . 9 � B I T 6 � i 5 4 � ---�- - �- -�---� ; � � , ! .. � ^ 3 . ' _ �\ Z , - � r --. NONTN . SCALE� fecsibility Report: STRATFORO WOODS ��s 200� SANITARY SEWER ADID WATER iMPRoveMeNr No. CITY OF ME�IDOTA HEIGHTS . 86 — 13 � 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heighcs.Minnao�a . , � `�,�, � , ' — � . � IQ�� u � l�E � _ 1 ` i " ' ,O /! I�`' �� :� ��.� � � � � - + FL:."` ` I oc :, � � . ' . . � �r _ J au�ow � ` � T � /L i �� - / �i \� -•\ - • � Q� i E z ' � � _ ._ : r . _ . � .. . �/ �/ _ � - / . � 2= : ':: . . . . _ � I � Q . � � , � , t - � �� , /� � ,1 t . PON� \ \ � � �' � v) ; ' I - 20� f. I d \� � \ \ � � T I � • __ ..a �` J � p� � �� I --� ��' . --`` \ J/ E q � ' . ��_. , �__ � i — , 5 �� __ ,l\ � -=---�! `� '�, '� , . ` E ' ,4� � ;p ' - I •- ; � � � . . , ' , Ca •— — i �9 %� �—.et�xwren / � � .� � �f � _ � i ; i � i��' � � � _ ! � . � _ _ / � . �lJ `' E�ii _��OG� �� ,� P� STnA1F.::�:C F�qn 'SC'� :y , � �� ' PIL4� y�� 2 . � , �� ' �--- i I .� �. � \ ` — � ( ' � �,� �— - : ;- . • . . L � I� . . � f � °j � = i -� _ , �. 4 �, -z � � � � � � �rz :` ;,r � F. ; 2 � . � , � o �,� �� Q � � � ti �. � . , I � _ ' _ �'_ EI[STING STOPM I4Ua101E ► � , , ; � . , a � , --�--- �- , - � --- \ c C Fi J 7 L ... "' ( J re� urae,iscx crn. J �, � O � � r �� tG —1 I � U � Z � � . i � � -• �_ ' z '� t 3 • e , i -i - , � J�G � � ,t '� � � e , � — - -- —��--- / GJ , i5 .�' 'ci � " • -- _ ; � - � . ��1�� v anvEm �O \ ,\\C ` i � 14 ^�' 9;•: . G R O A • . _4 � OUT�OT e ' E � � ��.- Q (`1 � • exca►no■ \ � g o K�J I '1 1MC00wALD) � � �\ " ' j W S �, '`\" � � �EL D. DuPONT IZ --_ � zQ • , ' - onor . ' �� ` �2 Y --?. � - : .'•'•.. 5 4 3 � � � ADDITION f J ; • � _ �• � - , i - � � ,e N cz 1 - � -. - - ' � r � 4t � W — 2 I �3 — „ i �.. ' � � \ C • �,, P,_ �0 I N �T, (�-- ' i -- �_' . :,t - ` 2 i ' � �� — •--•----- - � ` � 9 � , I w ; • • B 7 � 6 I'� .5 c TORIA COURT Q t--- 1 KAY A!� '�^y^_� ________Ii J � � --- _. , - _ 'I. .�� ? 8 � � � ._. _ ` � .. � � � I f _ � _� ' .. ' i , � �.. 10 9 �' ' �� _ � _ • -- Q -�� - . - � � _ , � : � _ �-- �TH . SCALE� Feasibility Repori: S T R A T F 0 R D W 0 O D S � ��' Z�� STORM SEWER �aovenneNr No. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS $ 6- 13 750 Sauth Plaza Drive Mendota Heights. Minnesota 5 CITY OF MFNDOTA HEIGHTS '1� � April 2, 1987 � T0: Mayor, City Council and City �r��or � FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Utility Vacation Park Place Job No. 8625 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 12 DISCUSSION: � There is a trunk watermain that runs through some new lots platted in the Park Place subdivision (Wachtler site). The City will be relocating that water line out of the easement when we complete the public improvements to serve Park Place this summer. The Developer needs to have the easement vacated so that the lots where the easement runs through homesites become buildable. ' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the utility easement for the trunk watermain on the Park Place plat be vacated (subject to the completion of a public improvement project relocating the line this summer). ACTION REQUIRED• Conduct the required public hearing. If Council then desires to imple- ment the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 87- , RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT. 0 1 City of Mendo�a Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RFSOLUFION N0. 87— RESQLIJTION APPRQVING VACATIDN OF A UTILITY EASF.�ENT WHEREAS, Jeff Schoenwetter and Halley Land Corporatian are the current record owners�of Ghe property inciuded within the plat of Park Place Subdivision, I7akota � County, Minnesota; and tC � WHEREAS, a petition has been duly presented to the City Cauncil of the City of Mendo�a Heights by Che above property owners for the vacation of a 20 foot wide utility ea�ement particularlq described as follaws: � ihat part of ti�e South iwenty four feet (SZ�' } of the North Thiriy (30j � acres af Gavernment Lot Eight (8), Section Twenty 7hree (23), Township Twenty Eigfi� �28� Morth, Range Twenty 7hree t23�, West, Dakata County, Minnesaia, lying east- erly of the centerline of the Northern States Power Campany highline easement (which centerline lies parallel to and is 962.5Q feet more or less westerly of the west line of Wachtler Avenue, and A strip of iand twenty {20) feet in widih over and across the Wesi foriy �40j rods af tfre South 7en (10) acres of Government Lot Eight (8), Section'23, Town- ship Twenty Eighi (28�, Range Twenty Three (23} West, ihe cenieriine of wi�ich is described as follows: � Beginning an the north line of the hereinabove first descri�bed tract"at a point 25 feet east of the centerline of the Northern States Power Company propane iine easement (which centeriine lies parallei to and is 937� feet, more or iess, westerly of the west line of Wacht'ler Avenue); thence proceeding southerly para- 11ei to il�e centerline of said propane iine easement to a point 50 feet north of the south line af said Government Lot Eight (8), thence proceeding westerly paralle] to and 50 feei north af sald south iine io a point 85 feet west of the said centerline of the said propane line easement, t�isnce deflecting�at an angle of 45° to the left and continuing to the said south iine and ihere terminating. � , WHEREAS, a notice oi hearing on said vacatian has been duly publistied and posted more than two weeks before the date scheduled for the hearing on said vacatian, aIl in accardance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held an said vacation on Apri1 7, 1987, at 8:Q0 o'clock P.M., at the City Hal1 of the City af Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded ta hear all persons interested in said vacation an¢ all gersans were afforded an opgortunity to presenC their views anc3 objections to the granting of said petiti�n. . _ NQW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o£ Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: � 1. That the vacation of the utility easement described above, situated in, the City of Mendota He?ghts, is in the best interest of �he public and the City, and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welf are of the communitY• ----- - 2. That the ahove described utility easement be and the same is hereby ' - vacated. " ' 3. That the City�Clerk be and is hereby autharized anci direc�ed ta prepare and presen�. to the proper Dakota Caunty of£icials a notice of completian of these vacatian proceedings, alI in accordance with the applicable Minnesota� S�atutes. Adapted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th day of Agri1 7.987. ` . CITY OF ME�iDOTA HEiGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: ' Kathleen M. Swanson, City Cl'erk - a , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � April 2, 1987 T0: Mayor, Ci�y Council and Cit� �l��l��rator / � FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director StIBJECT: Kertneling at Animal. Haspital. DISCUSSION: The Planning Cammission conducted a gublic hearing at their March 24, I9$7 meeting to cansider an amendment ta the Czty Ordinance Co allaw ken— neling at animal hospita�.s. This ordinance��amendment, when adopted, will now a11ow �he City ta use Dr. Koep%e's faczlity as the City Pound {see attached memos). " ' � ' Staff had prepared recommended Ianguage for the Ordinance that simply removed the sections prohibiting kenneling. The Planning Commission recom— mended changing that language to specifically state that kenneling was now allowed. RECOMI�NDATION • The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend amending �he City Ordinance to a11ow kenneling of animals bp conditianaZ use permi.t at anzmal haspitals. AGTION REQUIRED• Conduct the required public hearing and if, af�er the hearing the Council desires to implement the Planning Commi.ssion recommendatian they should pass a motion adopting the follawing amendment ta 4rdinance 401, Section 13.2(b} to read: Annimal Haspita2 {Veterinary Clinic}. As used hereunder the term "Animal Ho�pital" or Veterinary Clinic" sha11 be deemed to mean a facil.ity for the diagnosis, trea�ment and medical care of smal.Z ani— mals, in which all professional services are canducted within an en— � closed building and which includes the kenneling af such animals. � GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOT� COUNTY, MINNES�TA ' ORDINANCE NO. 231 ORDINANCE AMENDINt� THE MEND4TA xEIGiiTS ZONING ORi}INANCE The City Cauncil af the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: Sectian 1. Ordinance No. 401 known, and re�erred �o as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended in the following respect: � The following paragraph i� hereby amended in. Section 13.2(6) of said Ordinance: I3.2 (6j Ar�imal Ho�pital ('t7eterinary Clinic) . As used hereunder, the term "Animal Hospital" or "Veterinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility �or the diagnosis, treatment and medical care af small animals, in which all professional services are condtzcted within an enc3ased building and which includes the kenneling o� such animals. _ Section 2. Thi� Ordinance shall be in full force and e`ffect frorn and after its publication accarding to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 7th day af April, 1987. a �: •_ Kat leen M. Swanson City Clerk 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By C ar es E. Mertensa ta Mayor 0 �_� Fl � CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS ME1�10 � January 36, 19$7 TQ: Mayar, City Council and City ;, a. � ator - ��'�� FROM: James E: Danielson, Public Works Director Y _ . � SUBJECT. Kennelling for Mendota Heights Dag Catcher _ DISCUSSION• � The i�endota Heights Zoning Ordinance presently daes nat allow for kenneling of dogs wi�hin any district except the B-2 District, and that is only in conjunct�.an w:ith a VeCerinary Clinic and anly' during the time geriad necessary for medica]. care (see a�tached Ordinance). Dr. Koepke, owner of the Mendota Heights Ana.mai. Hospital was not aware af the restriction and has done some kenneling. �He has 16 stalls for kenneling at his facility. His medical buszness has naw increased to �he point where he no longer is able �o prc�vide kenneling except for �he Midwest Animal Services. Midwest is the West St. Paui dog catcher. Chief Delmant would a�.so like to use Midwest and was negatiata.ng with �Chem for use in 1987. In the course of the negotiations he discavered that �C.Y�ey use Dr. Kaepke for kenneling. Being as this is ilZegal under our ordinance Chief ., Delmont would like to have the City modify its ordinance to allow Dr. Roeplce to kennel. S�aff fee3.s thaC there are several good reasons why the City should �F modify its ardinance: 1. Many o£ the dogs captured need medicaZ attention and Dr. Koepke would then be readily available to treat them. 2. Oak Crest Kennels (our existing service) is somewha� remote for our residents and Dr. Koepke is centra3ly loca�ed for easier accessability. 3. Oak Crest has no medical. facilities and is qui�e often not open _ , during the hours our residents need service. 4. Dr. Kaepke alsa makes a diligent effort ta find homes for urzc3a�.meti dogs in lieu of putting them ta sleep. , 1 RECOMMENDATIQN • S�aff would like to use Midwest and Dr. Koepke's facili�y for 198%. ACTION REOUiRID • . If Council agrees they should direct staff to �ake the necessary actian ta modify the Ci.ty's ordinance to allow kenneling by Conditional. tJse Permi,t -.:� �„•.� at animal hospitals. To acce2erate the approval process Dr. Koepke wil.I at �he same time apply f or the a modificaGion to his �onditional Use Per mi.t to al.law kenneling. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO February 12, 1987 � T0: Mayor, City Council and City m��}�s�tor R � - _ i / , FROM: James E. Danielsbn Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kenneling - Mendota Heights Animal Hospital DISCUSSION: Staff requested at the January 20, 1987 City Council meeting that action be taken to modify the City's zoning ordinance to allow for kenneling at animal hospitals. We made this request so that the police could use Midwest Animal Services and Dr. Koepke's services for dog catching in 1987. See memo dated January 16, 1987. . , � At that meeting, Council expressed some concerns about Dr. Koepke's operation and directed staff to invite him to a subsequent meeting to dis- cuss the matter. Dr. Koepke�informed me that he has a class on Tuesday evenings so he will not be able to arrive until later in the meeting (9:30+). He emphasized in his conversation wi.th me that he was willing to do the kenneling for the-City's do� catcher but that he was doing it as a community service not as a money making venture. His treatment and adver- tising efforts to find homes for the dogs more than use up any income he receives. Other� kennels simply put the unclaimed dogs to sleep after the required five day holding period. • - � I have attached a letter of explanation from Dr. Koepke, his State Kennel License and a current inspection report. - i RECOMNNIENDAT ION • �I �� Staff continues to request that Council take the necessary action to allow the City to use Midwest and Dr. Koepke's facility for,dog catching in 1987. i - , �I ACTION REQUIRID: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should direct staff to take the necessary action to modify the City's ordinance to allow kenneling by conditional use permit at animal hospitals. �` � � 6 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO M�RCH 17, 1987 - TO: Planni.ng Commission � FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg P.W. Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment to A11ow Kenneling in B-2 Zone 1 DISCUSSIlJN • . Police Chief Delmont desires ta switch dog catchers and use Midwest Animal Services and Dr. Koepke's Animal Haspital. See attached Cit�r Cauncil memos dat�ed January 16 and February 12. In order to do this, the Gity needs to modify its Ordinance Na. 401, 5ecta.on 13.2(6), to eliminate the language prohibiting kenneling/. 13.2(6) Ani.mal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic). As used hereun.der the term "Animal Hospital" or "Veter�.nary Cla.nic" shall be deemed ta mean a facility for the diac�nosa.s, treatment - ' and medical care of small animals, in wh�.ch a11 prafessional services are conducted witha.n an enclosed - building. (and which excludes the kenneling of such animals except for the time period neces�ary to provide medical care therefor). The word.ing in parentheses wauld be deleted fram the Ordinance. At a recent City Council meeting, the Council agreed to allow kenneling in a B-2 zone and directed that the appropr�.ate hearings be conducted to modi.fy the ordinance. ACTICYN REOUSRED: ,Conduct a public hearing to consi.der the Ordinance amendment ` and make a recom,mend,ation. to the City Council. JED/PRB:madlr attachment u � 5 MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS April 1, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Fraze��C'�/�dministrator / Re: Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation and Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment INTRODUCTION When the City submitted�the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council late in 1985, the Metropolitan Council declined approval because they�felt we had not adequately addressed the requirements of their Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. During 1986, the Metropolitan Council developed a model aircraft noise attenuation ordinance which local communities can adopt to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. At its � meeting of February 17th, the Cit� Council referred the ; ordinance to the Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation. The Commission took that action at its March ; 24th meeting. The ordinance is now before Council (with the ', Planning Com3nission recommendation) for additional hearing � and consideration. DISCUSSION Attached is the staff inemo and proposed ordinance as sent to the Planning Commission. The Commission held the required hearing on March 24th, and voted unanimously (with five Commissioners present) as follows: ; Commissioner Henning moved to recommend adoption of the proposed model noise ordinance and urged i that the City Council strongl� suggest that the i Metropolitan Airports Commission, Federal Aviation ' Administration, and Metropolitan Council make use � of the noise corri.dors as delineated on the map and that they utilize the Highway 55 corridor, and that ' air traffic not be directed to begin their turns ', within any of the contour lines. Seconded by � Commissioner Burke. ' State legislation which would permit us to adopt the ' ordinance has been heard and favorably reported out of � Committee in both the House and Senate. However, at this ! writing (and likely by the Council meeting of April 7th) the � law has not been passed bx either body, nor signed by the Governor. Therefore, it is recommended that Council simply hold the public hearing and decide whether there is a -consensus to adopt the ordinance, then table actual adoption until the statutory authority has been granted. I am further recommending that we proceed to resubmit the Southeast Area Plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council, askinc� that the� grant approval of the plan contingent upon our final adoption of the Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation. I have not attached another copy of the Amendment. If you would like to review it, and no longer have your original copy, please call the City offices. I will also have a copy at the meeting Tuesday evening. ACTION REQUIRED Council should hold the required public hearing on the Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation and discuss the merits thereof. Actual adoption should be tabled until the necessary legislative authorization has been signed into law. If Council concurs with the staff recommendation regarding resubmittal of the Southeast Area Plan, it should pass a = motion directing staff�to send a letter to the Metropolitan Council informing them of our action on the Noise ardinance, and requesting that they approve the Southeast Area Plan amendment, contingent upon final City adoption of the Noise ordinance. � � MEMO' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � . March 17, 1987 t j To: Planning Commission ' � - � From: Kevin Fra ]1/ �ty Administrator � ..�'� � Re: Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation INTRODUCTION As we are all well aware, the impact of aircraft noise is a ! major factor affecting development in much of Mendota I Heights. Last year when we submitted our Southeast Area ! Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council, j they withheld approval because they felt that we should take ! additional steps to insure noise compatibility of future ; development. It appears that the major thing they want us to � do is to adopt an ordinance closely following their model noise ordinance. - o � The attached ordinance is taken almost verbatim from the ^ ' Metropolitan Council's model, and has been referred to the � Planning Commission by the City Council for public hearing, , consideration, and recommendation. BACKGROUND In April, 1983, the Metropolitan Council adopted into the Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide, a section called Guidelines of Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. The purpose of the Guidelines is to promote local regulation of land uses near airports so as to avoid uses that are detrimentally impacted by aircraft noise. j When Mendota Heights submitted the Southeast Area � Comprehensive Plan amendment for approval by the Metropolitan � Council early last year, the Guidelines became an issue. The ; Council commended us for our efforts to promote uses more � compatible with aircraft noise, but said that we had failed ' to adequately address the spacific requirements of the ' Guidelines, and withheld Plan approval until we had rectified i_ , . . . - " - � _ .� . that "deficiency." Specifically, the Council indicated that they would want us to take two additional steps to.insure adequate compliance with the Guidelines. First,, to•adopt an ordinance that would actually regulate landtuses within the defined aircraft noise zon�s, both by limiting types of land uses and by requiring that certain noise attenuation features be built into those structuresthat are allowed. Second, they wanted us to devise some type of notification program for those who move into defined noise impact areas. In response, the City as�ked the Metropolitan Council to develop model programs that we could consider. The Council was supposed to have done this as a follow up to the adoption of the Guidelines in 1983, but for whatever reason, had never completed the task. Over the past year, they have drafted and adopted a model noise attenuation ordinance. The Council has not addressed the notification program, and seems to have backed off that requirement, since according to noise consultants working witYi the Metropolitan Airports Commission, no local governments in the country have adopted notification programs because of unresolved concerns about potential liability. i I Metropolitan"Council staff have indicated to me that they -will recommend approval of our Southeast Area Plan Amendment when we have adopted an adequate noise ordinance. DISCUSSION Attached is a proposed ordinance, draft almost verbatim from the Metropolitan Council's model. The only changes made by staff are those that make it specifically fit Mendota Heights versus being a generic model. I believe that the ordinance_is fairly easy to read and self- explanatory. Therefor�,� I will not reiterate its contents in this memo. However, following are a few comments about policy issues and contingencies surrounding adoption of the ordinance, that should help to focus the Commission's consideration. Appendices - Appendix Zones, and Appendix B, Statutorv Authoritv - A'is the map of Airport Noise Reduction Noise Compatibility Tables 1 and 2. The ordinance is not only an amendment to the zoning ordinance, but also, in effect, an amendment to the provisions of the State Building Code (i.e. it imposes additiornlbuilding standards-on affected structures). By current statue, the State Building Code is preemptive; local governments may neither subtract from.nor add to the requirements of that Code. Attached is a copy of legislation that has been�introduced to specifically authorize local adoption of noise ordinances, and it is hoped that the law will be passed expeditiously. Enforceabilitv - Our building inspector, Paul Berg, has reviewed the ordinance, and feels that it will be enforceable by our Code Enforcement department. INCOMPATIBILITY OF EXISTING OR PLANNED USES - Existing or planned uses (i.e. as reflected in our Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance) appear to be largely compatible with the restrictions of this ordinance. The parcel of property south of Visitation/St. Thomas and south of Mendota Heights Rd. is currently zoned single-family residential, which would be incompatible with a Zone III restriction. However, the Southeast Area Plan changed designation of this property to = Business, which would be compatible. The existing single-family neighborhoods of Furlong and Roge�sr Rd. woul.d be all�owed to continue as grandfathered uses in Zone III, and the ordinance would provide for infill development, reconstruction, and additions to existing structures in these neighborhoods. However, single family "new development and major redevelopment", as defined by the ordinance, would not be allowed in these areas. As the Commission may be aware, the City Council has initiated a major study to consider the future development plans and options for the whole Trunk Highway 55 corridor. NOISE CONTOUR LINES - The noise contour lines, as shown on the map (Appendix A), are from a computer generated model that made certain assumptions about flight patterns and the aircraft fleet mix. The model also included certain technical assumptions about a tolerable level of noise, and how that is defined. As anyone close to the problem knows only too well, aircraft noise is an ever changing issue. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is currently completing work on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 150 noise compatibility plan. That plan meets federal specifications for acceptable compatibility between aircraft noise and land uses. The _ standards af that study are somewhat different than those used in the Metropolita� Council Guidelines, and results in contours that�ar� less extensive in the amount of land area cover'ed. The Cauncil has made some verbal commitment to eventually makes the two sets of regulations compatible. However, we da nat knaw when that would happen, so the anly way to proceed at the current tim� is to adopt contours as defined in the existi-ng Guidelines, recagnizing that we may be revisiting this issue when and if the contours are later amended. Gity Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy has long represented the City on aircraft naise issues� and participated in the deliberation� that l�d up to adoptian of the Guidelines in 1983. Larry will be pre�ent at the Commission meeting to answer questians, and provide the "historical" perspective. SL7NIl�IARY AND RECOMMENDATiON The City has previously expressed certain reservations about � the noise ordinance approach. However, the model ardinance prepared by the Metropoiitan Counci.l does appear to offer a warkable approach ta the legitimate need.to protect compatibilzty in naise sensitive areas. , - .. As the Commission is well aware, the Southeast Area Plan amendments were initiated almost two years aga, and meaningful cansideration of specific develapment plans have been held up since that time. The City Cauncil has recently reiterated its support for the 5outheast Area plan, and its intentian to proceed taward implementatian. It appears that adopting the model noise ordinance, or a close derivative thareof, is a necessary step toward getting the whole issue aff dead center. There�'ore, staff recommends your favorable consideratian. ACTIC?N REOUIRED To conduct the advertised public hearing, discuss the proposed ordinance, and make a recommendation to Council with vrhatever conditions are deemed appropriate. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE FOR AIRCRAFT NOISE ATTENUATION An Ordinance promoting the health, safety"and general welfare of the citizens of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, requiring compliance with noise reduction standards in building construction. SECTION 1. Statutorv Authoritv This ordinance is adopted pursuant SECTION 2. Findinas of Fact � The City of Mendota Heights finds that development within certain areas of the City is impacted by aircraft noise; that said noise is beyond the regulatory authority of the City to control; that certain uses of land are inappropriate in areas of high aircraft noise; that some structures do not adequately attenuate aircraft nose resulting in negative impacts on the '�ealth, safety and welfare of the residents or inhabitants of the �tructures; that, through proper constructiom methodsf the means exist to attenuate aircraft noise to interior levels which alleviate such negative impacts; and that the requirements of this ordinance are necessary to promote and preserve the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Mendota Heights. SECTION 3. Purpose � The purpose of this Ordinance is to require that new or redeveloped portions of buildings within the City of Mendota Heights be constructed with materials and in such a manner that aircraft noise is attenuated by the structure to an interior level which has no adverse impact on the health, safety and general welfare of the residents, all in accordance with the ` Metropolitan Council's Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. , SECTION 4. Definitions 1 For purposes of this Ordinance, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them in this section. AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONE. Aircraft Noise Zone means any one of the four zones identified on the map attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated herein. CONSISTENT: Land uses that are acceptable. dBA. dBA means a unit of sound pressure level weighted by use of the A metering characteristics and�weighting as specified in the American National Standards Institu�e Specification for Sound Level Meters (ANSI S1.4-1983), which is hereby incorporated by reference. dBA is also zeferred to as an A- weighted decibel. - INCONSISTENT: Land uses that are not acceptable even if acoustical treatment were incorporated in the structure. I ' "INFILL DEVELOPMENT" pertains to an undeveloped parcel or parcels of land proposed for development similar to or less noise-sensitive than the developed parcels surrounding the undeveloped parcel (for example, a new house on a vacant lot in a residential neighborhood, or a new industry on a vacant parcel in an established industrial area). i Leq. Leq means the equivalent continuous sound level which over the period of one hour has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time varying sound. Ldn. Ldn means the day-night average level, or the 24-hour equivalent continuous sound level (time-averaged A-weighted sound level) from midnight ^ to midnight, obtained after the addition of 10 dBA to sound levels measured from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. ' "MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT" means a relatively large parcel of land with all structures proposed for extensive rehabilitation or demolition, and '� different uses (for example,�demolition of a square block of old office and hotel buildings for new housing, office, commercial uses; conversion of warehouse to office and commercial uses). "NEW DEVELOPMENT" means a relatively large, undeveloped tract of land proposed for development (for example, a residential subdivision, industrial park or shopping center). � NOISE REDUCTION LEVEL. Noisi reduction level means the difference between the exterior and interior sound level, expressed in dBA, which is achieved by the intervening-structure.� ' . i RECOGNIZED ACOUSTICAL SPECIALIST: A recognized acoustical specialist means a person qualified by education and experience to conduct sound anayysis of buildings and approved for such purpose by the City. The approved individual shall have at least three years of experience in the field of sound control; a degree from a recognized institute of higher learning in the process of sound analysis of buildings. I • . � .r "RECONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES" pertains to replacing a structure destroyed by fire, age, etc., to accommodate the same use that r/ existed befdore destruction, or expanding a structure to accommodate -_ increased demand for existing use. Decks, patios and swimming pools are• . considered allowable uses in all cases. � SOUND. Sound means energy that is trans"mitted by pressure waves in the air or in other materials and is'the objective cause of the sensation of hearing. It is commonly called noise if it is unwanted. SOUND ATTENUATION. Sound attenuation means the reduction in sound level which occurs between the source and receiver. SOUND LEAK. Sound leak means an opening in a structure through which sound can pass. Sound leaks are ofteri extremely small holes or cracks. In general, an air leak is a sound leal. SOUND LEVEL. Sound level means the level of sound pressure measured with a sound level meter and one of its weighting (frequency) networks. When A- weighting is used, the sound level is expressed as dBA. SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS._(STC). Sound transmission class means a single- number rating for describing the degree of sound transmission loss specified for a wall, window, partition or other building element. The higher the 'TC, the more attenuation the building element will afford. _ -o _ SECTION 5. Scope and Effect The Aircraft Noise Zones established by this Ordinance shall overlay � the zoning districts established by Ordinance No. 401, adopted April 3, � 1962, so that any parcel of land lying in an overlay zone shall also lie on � one or more of the established zoning districts. Territory within a given h overlay zone shall be subject to the requirements established by the other � applicable ordinances and regulations of the City. Within each adopted � overlay zone, all uses shall be permitted in accordance with the regulations for the underlying zoning districts, provided, however, that the appropriate t building permit is first obtained, and provided further that no use } designated as inconsistent on the Noise Compatibility Tables, attached • � hereto as Appendix B and incorporated herein, shall be permitted. This ± Ordinance applies to all construction and any reconstructed portion of a �/ M building requiring a building permit after the efiective date of this � Ordinance except decks, patios, swimming pools, garages, breezeways and � similar uninhabitable structures. In the case of conflict between this Ordinance and any other applicable codes or ordinances, the more restrictive � requirement shall be met. SECTION 5. Prerequisite� to Issuance of BuildinQ or Occupancv Permit - Any appiication for a City of Mendota Heights building ar occupancy permit pertaining to land located in an Aircraft Noise Zone mu�t demonstrate campliance �ith-the pravisions of this Ordinance prior to the issuance of such permit. SECTIt�N 7. E�tablishment of Zones _ The following Aircraft Noise Zones are hereby established as part af the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Mendota Heights. Aircraft Noi�e Zone I Aircraft Noi�e Zone II � Aircraft Noise Zane III� Aircraft Noise Zane IV I Th� boundaries of the Aircra�t Noise zones are as delineated on the diagram attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated herei.n. � � SEGTION 8. Naise Compatibilitv Tables ✓� i All construc�.ion o-r—r-econs�truetion requiring a building permit and located within an Aircra�t Noise Zone shaZl. be constructed in such a way that the applicable noise level reduction requirements con�.ained in the Noise CompatibiZity Tables (Appendix B� are met ar exceeded. Where a _ particuiar structure contains different land uses, the more stringent requirements of the applicable table shall apply, except where it is architecturally possible ta achieve the apprapriate noise reduction level far each different use, and the uses are acausticalZy �eparated by a wall or partiti.an with a minimum STC;of 25, � SECTI4N 9. Enforcement i The provisions a� this Ordinance shall. be enfarced pursuant to Sectians IO and I3« ; SECTION I0. _Plan� and SU�CI.�ZC3'tlOTiS A. All�applicants for a building or occupancy permZt shall include with the application aZl p2ans, specificatians or other i.nformatian•required by this Ordinance. The plans and specifications shal]. describe in suffic.ient detail ail pertinent features of the building, building materials, heating and ventilation systems, including but not limited to the STC ratings of exterior roof/ceilings, walls, windows, and doors; and other pertinent data!as may be requested by the City to indicate conformance with the applicab•le noise reduction level reguirements as specified in the Noise Compatibility Tables. Ta assure the el.iminatian i � of sound leaks, the plans and specifications shall demonstrate compliance with the following standards. 1. A mechanical ventilation system shall be installed that will provide ,the minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirements as provided in the State and Uniform Building Code for the proposed occupancy without thc need to open any exterior doors or windows. 2. The perimeter of all exterior windows and door frames shall be sealed airtight to the exterior wall construction. 3. Fireplaces shall be equipped with well-fitted chimney closing devices. 4. All ventilation ducts,•except range hoods, connecting interior space to outdoors shall be provided with a bend such that no direct line of sight exists from exterior to interior through the vent duct. 5. Doors and windows shall be constructed so that they are close- fitting. Weatherstripping seals shall be incorporated to eliminate all edge gaps. 6. Al1 penetrations through exterior walls by pipes, ducts, conduits and the like shall be caulked airtight to the exterior construction. The City may reclucire that .plans arrd specifications be certified by a' Recognized Acoustical Specialist for compliance with this Ordinance. B. Within 30 days of receipt of appropriate plans and specifications, the City shall approve or reject the plans based upon the ability of the proposed materials and construction techniques to adequately attenuate noise. The City shall approve the plans and specifications if: 1. The plans and specifications adequately document the use of construction assemblies that meet or exceed the STC ratings required by the following table: , , STC RATINGS REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEMENTS SPECIFIED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION REQUIRED STC RATING NEEDED FOR COMPLIANCE* dBA Roof/Ceilina Walls Windows Doors 20 25 30 35 40 40 45 50 55 60 40 45 50 55 60 30 20 35 25 40 30 45 35 50 40 *All values +/- 2 STC. The STC laboratory test of construction materials and assemblies must be conducted according to the requirements of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM E90 or ASTM E 336); or t 2. The plans and specifications have been certified by a Recognized Acoustical Specialist as achieving the interior noise level reduction required by the applicable portion of the Noise Compatibility Table'. In the event that the drawings are rejected, the reasons for such` rejection shall be submitted to the applicant in writing. No construction shall occur prior to the approval of the appropriate plans and specifications. Al1 construction shall be performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as determined by the City shall be deemed to meet the noise attenuation requirements of this Ordinance. SECTION 11. Inspections A. All construction or work for which a building permit is required shall be subject to inspections by the City. Inspections of noise attenuation work shall be performed during the required building construction " inspections specified byjthe City of Mendota Heights code. B. Field Testing. When inspection indicates that the construction is not in accordance with the approved plans, the'City may order such corrective action as may be necessary to meet the noise attenuation requirements of this Ordinance. In lieu of performing such corrective action, a building owner'may submit a test report based upon field tests showing compliance with the noise reduction level requirements contained in the applicable Noise Compatibility Table. The field test shall be performed in accordance with the American Society for Testing Materials � I ' � Standard E 336-84, Part A1.2.2. Outside to Inside (Level Reduction). ; SECTION 12. Fees - � The City of Mendota I�ights is authorized to collect fees to cover E administrative and enforcement costs. This fee shall be �� $ p F _ ` SECTION 13. Severabilitv � � t If any part of this Ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or ` otherwise illegal, the remainder of this Ordinance shall remain in force and � effect as if such unenforceable provision had not been included herein. e , NOISE COMPATIBILITY TABLE 1 Noise Reduction Level in dBA Required to Meet Standards For Use IN NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT � - The Noise Reduction Level numb�rs s ecif for each t e.of land use the ( P Y YP amount of interior sound level reduction necessary for the use to be compatible in the applicable Aircraft Noise Zone). � T,AND USE TYPE � AIRCRAFT i NOISE ZONE I II III IV I � ', • Leq(80+) (75-80) (70-75) (65-70) Residential • Single/multiplex with individual entrance INCO INCO Multiplex/apartment with shared entrance 1 INCO 35 Mobile Home ! �INCO INCO Educational and Medical � Schools, churches, hospitals, nursing homes � ! Cultural, Entertainment, Recreational i Office, Commercial Retail Services � Transportation-passenger facilities Transient Lodging j Other medical, health & educational��services Other services '� Industrial, Communication, Utilitv i • • Actricultural Land, Water Area, � , , INCO 35 35 INCO 25 30 25 INCO 25 _ � INCO INCO 25 30 25 20 30 25 CNST 35 30 25 CNST INCO 30 25 20 35 30 25 CNST 35 30 25 CNST 25 CNST CNST CNST n Resource Extraction CNST CNST CNST CNST 2 These uses do not permit "in the wall" air-conditioning units i.n Zanes I, 2I, and III. _� 0 � NO3SE COMPATIBILITY TABLE 2 / Noise Reduction Leve3 in dBA to Meet Standard for Use In ✓ INFILL DEVELQPMENT AND REC�NSTRUCTION QR ADDITIQNS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES (The Noise Reduction Level numbers speci£y far each type of Iand use the amaunt of interior sound level reduction necessary for the use to be compatible in the applicable Aircraft Naise Zone}. LAND USE TYPE � AIRCRAFT ' NOISE ZQNE . � I II III IV Leq ($0+} (75-80} (7d-'75} (65-74} Residential � Single/multiplex with individual entrance 1 Multiplexfapartment with shared entrance 1 Mobile Home 1 J I 40 35 30 25 40 35 30 25 40 35 30 25 =Educati.onai and Medical � i Schools, churches, haspitals, nursing hames3 40 Cultural, Entertainment RecreationaZ 35 Office, Comm�rcial Retail , i Services ; Transportation-passenger facilities Transient Lodging ather madical, health & educational svcs. 4ther services _ 35 35 35 35 35 35 _ . ,. 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 25 20 25 CNST 25 25 25 25 CNST 20 CNST _ CNST � ' Industrial, Cammunication Utilitv 25 CNST CNST CNST Aariculturai Land, Water Area, Resource Extractian ' CNST CNST CNST CNST 1 These uses do not permit "in the�wal]." air-conditioning units in Zones I, II, and III. ! � . SECTION 14. This flrdina�ce shall be in full force and effect �rom and after its publication according to law. , Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this day of , 19$7. ` . CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ATTEST; Kathleen M. Swanson ^ity Clerk 4 By Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor i n 0 ti . ... . . . . . . � - ,�,_�= ` " -- 1 3 5 6 7 . 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 lg 20 21 22 23 ' 24 25 A bill for an act relating to the metropolitan government; authorizing �_ municipalities in the metropolitan area to adopt ordinances related to aircraft noise; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473. BE IT ENACTED BY THE;LEGISLATURE OF TFiE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. [473.192] [AIRCRAFT NOISE ATTENUATION.j . Subdivision l.i [CITATION.j This section may be cited as the "Metro olitan Area Aircraft Noise Attenuation Act." Subd. 2. [DEFINITIONS.] "Metro op litan area" has the meanin iven it in�section 473.121, subdivision 2. "Aviation olic lan" means the- lan ado ted b the metro olitan council ursuant to section 473.145. Subd. 3. [ORDINANCE.] An�uni�ipality in the metropolitan •I area which, in art or in whole, is within the aircraft noise � zones designated in the aviation policy plan may adopt and enforce ordinances and controls to regulate building _ construction methods and materials for the urpose of attenuatin aircraft noise in habitable buildings. Any crdinance adopted by a municipality must be adequate to im lement the metro olitan council's uidelines for land use � atibilit with'�aircraft noise. Section 16B.62 does not i a 1 to ordinances ado ted ursuant to this section. Subd. 4. [PROCEDURE.] Ordinances must be adopted and 1 1 �� - -__... _ _. �.�.....,._,�_ �.__. _ . ----- • ' '_.-- -. . _,_ '_ '•-.-• - ' ^---__ _..-- - ...�. amended in accordance with the procedure in section�462.357, 2 subdivisions 3 and 4. I ; . 3 Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] , • . � 4 Section 1 is effective the day followinq final enactment 5 and a�plies in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, 6 Ramsey, Scott� and Washington. m � � ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - r�a � April 2, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City ratar "' - FRQM: Jame� E. Danielson - Publ.ic Warks Director . . SUB,IECT: Schweiger Setback Variance � Case No. 87-01 DISCUSSION• The Pl.anning Commisszon considered a 2.7 foot rear yard setback vari- ance at their March meeting (see attached staff inemos). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted unartimou�ly to recommend granting the variance. � ACTION REQUIRID • Review the request with �.he applicant and if Council desires to irnple- ment the P1an�ing Commi�sian recommendation they shouZd pass a mo�ian ap- proving a 2.7 foot rear yard �etback variance far 2291 Ocala Court. . • March 17, 1987 To: Mendota Heights City Hall 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota Attention: City Council Dear Council Members: I am requesting a variance at 2291 Ocala Court for 3' at the South West corner of the house �for a 3 season porch. The reason it will go in the setback line is that in placing the house originally on the �ot, it fit with no problems, but in an effort to conform wit�h the court's design, it was in the court's best interest to tip the house to match equally with the next door neighbor's garage line. In other words, I made my garage line and my neighbor's garage line the same making a more uniform court. Also, by doing this, it has increased the visibility around the corner of the Cul de Saa from both directions of Ocala Lane and Ocala Court. However, in doing this our 3 season porch which is a 12 x 12 addition, goes approximately 3' into the back lot setbacks. I have explained this to all the neighbors and asked them to sign a petition, giving their consent to put the porch on. In closing, I hope you can see neighborhood's best interest when I the lot in this manner and request our 3 season porch on our home. Thanking you—in advance, Sincerely, that I had the placed the house on a variance to place Keith Schweiger � G PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINN. -1'HIS PETITION IS IN SUPPORT OF A VARIANCE FOR A 3-SEASON PORCH AT 2291 OCALA COURT, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, THE FUTURE RESIDENCE OF KEITH AND CINDY SCHWE2GER: �tv� A.�Ack�e��t �rP�iH� fiAlNN�SOTA FSL CORPORATION j � n � (�-�i!) L-.� � 2� w1, G�`. Ulh.1 u�J � ' � � Vtce Preside�t f,, , , . �� .-� w��-�� C��t ��r , � � 1-- 0 � �� . � � .et.,�C_e� OI G�- y�' � : e � i � I - _ ~ � ,, -... - --- � ,� Pt�� p`L% ' lr ,�,' �' �`�! O Q �-� ��y�` �j \ �j°�' � _ -- ' "�'" q ` x4 ie � r� _ � � �' � , O ¢� \ '` ` � � 2,�-'�, �� , � � � �� / � • �Pk3o, a�' `�� Aro ➢ � � � �/ -'.. � , �'�s ��{l J� o \ \ r�,a �,�� 3 ��?�l `� � 0' � I t�"��r� � ao�� y� -' �' � �� \ Cr��M�'f1� � _ O � � � �p k D � � '� � r n� a f� � , �k � � / , p! ,'.,�' , i ' ,,�-- 'Sx, ,'`�,�;,.. � 3� �D f. X� �h � � s s � r�r � � \ • � � \ � � �% ' � �;� '' � � � / O, r / • � k,�,a``� `� � ' ,,>' - �a� .' . .� �� Qa - ' � � . 3 - � % 4� / �'� -, / ��`•a. .� . � t4� ' � f'" �r 'o . � � � � ��,� � ��/ ' \ . r, �� , 'lo �i / t��'� . . , ' j� f � � �,� �C�'. � � = O . O. _ --\Q; /y�, �,O � , - 3 , ��, �, .,� .,5 �� ,y �' .� �'a� �9 �� .� ' �auS� �a�A'ria �- �J� �w�R �^�, �y � ��c05S//�(C� MARCH 17, 1987 L CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg P.W. Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Case No. 87-01, Schweiger, Variance DISCUSSION• � I r Keith Schweiger is constructing a new home at 2291 Ocala � Court. He would like to construct an attached 12'x12' three season porch in his back yard that encroaches on the rear yard F setback (see attached map). At the time Mr. Schweiger reviewed � the proposal with staff, he was made aware that there didn't � appear to be a demonstrated hardship. Mr. Schweiger still ; desired to make application for his variance request. � The Zoning ordinance requires a minimum of a 30 foot rear yard setback. Therefore, the applicant would need a 2.7 foot variance granted to allow construction of his three season porch as proposed. ACTION RE4UIRED: Review the proposal with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City Council. , 0 PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER; APPLICANT: LOCATION: ' ACTION REQUESTEQ: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 March 1987 : � Keith A. Schweiger North Corner of Ocala Lane and Ocala Court (sea sketch} Approval of Variance ta Rear Yard Setback 1. Keith and Cindy Schweiger currently live at 1985 Ford Parkway in St. Paul and proposeci to move to a new house under construction at 229i Ocala Court. Attached is a copy af th� site plan indicating the loeation of the house on the site, You wi!! note that their propasal is to add a, IZ feet x 1.2 fieet three season porch an the northwest side of the house. This is the rear yard of this lot, but you wil! note that it is contiguous to ihe side yard oi the tot next door {to the narthwest on Ocala Lane). � 2. Thus, if side yards were contiguous to side yards, each setback would nortnally be 10 feet. _ In this case, the ,r„equired setback is 3Q feet. The Schweiger's propose to extend into that required 30 foot rear yard a distance of 2.8 feet. Thus, the resulting remaining setback wil! be 27.3 #eet. 3. It would seem ihat this minor extensiat� into the yard is not af significant concern. The hardship here is that this lot and others like it in this portian of the replattin � riginal Friendly Hills called ,� ? "Delaware Grossing" averaged abo t 20,000 quare feet per lot. This is ' cansistEnt with mosi of the the ariginal Friendly Hills subdivision. 4. You wiii t�aie that ta the sautheast . a replaiting on ti�e aId Friendly Hills lots to the new Delaware Crossing lots, the new lats are 15,000 sq�aare feet in area. Thus, the problem with the Iot in question is ihat it ,,is a small lot, below the City's normal standards. There is also minimat space for extensions into the back yard area. 5. Members of the Planning Commission and Council may wish to go look at this lot and view ihis' site as it exis�s taday. � + :c. -_�._ - � -""` ��.;''�, �'��" c�.... �.. � . � �;�r-�� ` • . � ,�� . � ... �: i �� ._, a,�1�.��:� �'t � � • • • • _ ��r KY�f�Y Fi,'Z„�k'�s�� t'� �¢� ��✓:;:��`� ��} � —', t,�,, yr;��^r"c ( � '.alt:�:iA:q:��::��%.,.:•ti:;�:r3il rnss.i.::a � t ��;�¢� h � � , d :-� z�.a._ �� i � _� �� y i�QO�" �� '�`� � � � t ��;�� . �`� � - . o �., � � . '��r '',�'Q��:`;"� " �- � ; «. . '��' c'�� q��';�� --1 � • '�i��p«�� a � � � �.ac,Ti�� a � � :�� ,Dil��,�� . L pj ��,i��== f ��■�� 1 IIIIIII . �� —�' ��' i� - : � ��, �� ,,►, �, � � _��"� �ir�a� i�� - ;` �� %��''�� >�� ' � � � ��► �'� i�obi,��. � - �; �/ � �' ��..��■..��I4 � : ��O ��Q •T:L� � _ # � !n� � � �� . --��-.---� • - o ��p � 4► � . � l��-.---.��0��OOPq�� :,�� aQp;'�`4'� �"�� ►�►r ,�„ � , �. � � eeeee�e�r�. �� °�'��o -. � �: _��e��ee�e_ .. o v�o a �_ . _ �.Q�"�'—.�.�.�.- � •�o p,e '� �°o °a'•'°+•,��'" :��000.��lQ00��l��'� ;� � �p �`p� O�p �p�►a t a"�► r �io�a�oo�000000�y� �� oQqo aa .a ` _rl ....,..�,� � ,� � o � � oo v a.-o■�c„� 0 p f_ . ��' vOr� 015� ,�� r��0� � ,� �j'�,,� . E� � � 0.,� ��►r� � OO i � ..� � '� ��--vo;�ra _ � _ �.s_ 4 O O ��Yr� - rs O � ��.� �.��o�� :��s� �.�a ■ ��,p► ��o � � �'.■ . � ��,.�■o � ��.,,, ;d p .1 �Q�O► oM�• �� 10 i��i� � ��,�,. � SdeeD�'�i �� +I''/�r►►° rs�i'�'iii�//`�4� ��: �,��': � • c��. : u _ ,�.., ,. �S � (� � .�, � q _ �� U�` '��Jl_�� ! ' :Y!z...X � � /.�\ .'::...e�:asz5sea+ac�vsTY�:II1^_'..�C.X... � ' � � � . ��I 1 � � T� I � �� d�� .� . _ �.,�. __ .j�', •;•. :'•�.•:... . :�;� J•�:A .�. .... •- . . ... • . . � � . . 3 ��. ,, . � . ,, �, . � o ��=; y� 9 �+. • '`• .: i�_ ;,,avLc ,� ��i �s"%'�'�""'`. J . : � , . • • (.»i-t� � ; s- � `� �"•.:�ta � � . � � .�C' j . r . . (.'.�' ,..�rGn�ws�� f�,�� • .. .. . • • « .. :. .: . • . . 1. , , . _ , . . ('�+;�a,_,�-.d�n.��:�� ' ��s� "� �1'�••• ••• ::.:'a'i • , ^— . - � . ;' - , _ .t� . - � Case Na. D %- O� , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIG''IiTS w ,� � � ' . � DAKOTA COTJNTY , MZATNESOTA � , - � , _ .. _ :� •: , � � . . . ' - ; � .. ._ . _ _ _ .. _.K __�_. ..:} .,.. ,.t . �T _�;.:r��:;:.y .;:,> .,..�'i-. __.+,+.._'.! ...i -• � -` _. , . rn..- . . . . * �t• •• ... �.. ...i.rw�x � sr.� �, ' •w- . APPLICATIQN F4R CONSZD$RATION.�r� �:t:^•,.t.:;�~t ,�r}° t-�'M�=� �,.a=;.a;.;_,'�';-• , 4 , � a' . . ,... /�t� ' '�:::.;w.t yrr�.:�,..'�s4:`K_T�i'..�.xw .yi,.'e••^ �w . �` .�, _ _ x� s,. «,+r � .. ,�-�'....-. a w,.,ic?.n . . - -i.^....��..:....w-:.:........ y "�' 1J C ..'�;:. 5::a.� fi .'.'- T'... �.' .•,� •y •: .. � .. , r . . � . . - _ ' . . - ' - PLANNING REQUEST ' ` . F d . '" ..,.. . ' . ' � .> - . . _ , ___--__,.._._r...�......_.._.__...,._.� ....�. ..., . � ..-#.... , - , , ' . � . • . , • .j, _ ..,� '�,;;Date of Application � - a- � -] , � _ . _____.._..... _ �.._. _ � _..�...:�...... ...._ . .__, �. �; -.�=-= -�.....:.. �ee Paid �S`� �`' _��' � C1� �� Applicant ' . - .. . � �k°.��•= -:,K��.:, . _ . . „ .:�t�:•�;:' - - Name: (�}, ��{�,,, _..___.._ 21 �....-.,T�.,..:��'..�.,,.�, � •� .. - � ' - : Last ,___. . First , „� - ,:;. , ,:t rIni�ial • . -. '_ .. . _. . Address :�. ��S '-� r� rr� i� l�u�,.)1� �c ��P►� � i��. J"rJ�j l tp Number & Street T-, ,CitY.a..��:i:#:��_�=�. State ,�__ .;� _ _. ;Zip . , .. , , _.. . , . . � _ . . ,:.�. . `-ti=•' .. _ . Telephone Number: �p� � - �3 1 7 � - ' , . . �, . �. . w _ _ , Owner ,�.; . - , - � � . - Name . � �� u�2 • �� -S . - � � � c� U ~�'�. � . � Last .._ First Ini�iai . • _ �, L � - Address. �. _ __._._`_ ,_ fi.._ _ �' .� .. �� _. . _ • . Number & Street City State Zip ��• k r t . � ; StreeC Location of Property in Question: ,._ ,. ., � ,. . �� , • .. �� -, _ � � e ��i ,. _ _ .. "�• . . ,... � • ., .. {. , c� v�-� , (� G � � 1=�', � �- L �, �_ . • . , � _ ' Lega2 Descrigti.an �a£ _Proparty: . . .. ; � . � =_� ` „ _�.� f .. . : "=;; `:�.= ".Y .' .... .. . _ . ` , � - .' , .. '.. ' , �,.,p"'�'" - p1. � . . � l..J� � 1�'� �s"C22. .�z�i�fl'�� hilT�.7. _f�.',;� k Y � ""�.f. t. . ='.:e � F� - �,� , , . ' . . R �. -� ' - ' . .' _- _' '_ _ . l � _ _' �- .- '_.� � Y , . .,... . , . .: , ` , - , . ' � _ ____ . . . . . . ,_ . _ . • - . . . . ,. ¢ . ._._. _,._�.._._ _ ..... , . .. `..� ....... - . Y .. ..,. � ., �. .. . _ _ ; • � Type of Request �.�_ } . - _ �--.-._.___._ Rezoning .. .iF . � - .. . ..., .. .�. � ~. -- � - . ' .._ .,. �_�.::. ..._,..'_,_- w...�=..._.. __._X ,., . �. Variance �- �:i .. ��• ��°. � y� ;{:. „ �:��.. - - .Zx . • A -� '�.' � •r • ' � .�:�.;: `� � • -. ', o- - • _ . ` . - Conditional Use Permit � �,.. • - , '-.. � � =' , , � - '. ' - •• CondiGional Use Permit far P.U.D. . ' . '� �� , " : ��-�.-�< -• _ -�-�- -. -� �^-. ---- Minor Canditional Use Permit • ._ . :��:, ; , ��' , , - � i ' . - --.�_, ' _ _�• _-� . � Subdivision Approval � • �,. ' ' t _ . „ _ F�r ��:< . _ . -- - • � , v�..��:,�. . "�;' - . ' . -- =' • _ 't - - " ; _ 4 - _-_`. ,_ . '� _ . Plan'�Approval " .,'^.: � � �� , - , _ .-., . � � _ .�'. � . � - - - - :��'. ;��...�;, �_ ,�, . . Wetlands _Permit �Q;��„�`�,; .,.: . r '=�::.w:, -� • ��' _ :�' . y s . :J. a,.A P �x�r:,,r.. t _ . , . i . r , . - ' " . � ,t1rr..n'a'y- av.M .., «_t. ��.: . ,.. . �Other •��'r,.rt�w:'e!"+b�'}..,ei;.�.t u.Kr� r .; i• > . . _ ' . .- �- � _ ... ',S' . r,; .�.'^«a.� -, ^` ' �� w';�'Yr„�. � . � ' __ ' � . _ . - " _" "~ ;.� , 1 - �i �,.-•t.} •iw�,y,`�� r �'M.� i `'�i'S.�JO`s'�', �" • . e. . _ •y _ . ^�1H::'.f �y � - -S''• _ :r��Y;,r,-arn,� _ .':�,__, �r.� ,'r.r��' I�:;:'d•�;_ta;�` :,�,:i"S:i."'.�....,��u:.°'�zi� .t+:�+�:.+�.: _- ^ . � _ . - > ,..=:�'x= �^r e-' - .:� u- .rn•:�.. � .. � ..c . _ e - • ='- ,. . ' .'R'.• -- , ., - - •r , . 4..n _ _ n T _ _• . . . ' , ' -, ♦ -.• . • ' _ _ 'rF..W� a _ a n. � _ � • �:'}' � . � . _ � a.. . _� ' ., .. �¢µ r .�+ i}i .fi�'.� `y"'R i • _ Yir: n' Y6 r wa -.��I � ry j��L... aM _ � - I - _ s _'" .. __ _ _ �. • ` . ' �� 4r;a�.."'_�.Y.Y, :w, s . . " � , - � .<•-_.- _ �µ: .� _ µ _' � ' _ '...y''__i.s.M 'r'...c �'.��.�r,:.zt -_ L �- " - m��i:r-i:�.i 3i��zti>�Pr ��'iFi�i;.:::. _' - ...: � ' L` _ :'r » _ _ . _.. • -_ - • _. . . '"- 'Gcz_ _ -::"r,�':x,. ._ _.. ��i`�xc,; <;y.!;"':.i,i; -i'_x;_:."':=':«� ... . ; � ` . . .4 .. - � _ ,....... . _ _ - .' ' . ._ - aS.:.ia..i�t.,,_ .d+,Yti'm:'.__�..aa_a - ^�^- �• - - 1 '�iti+; 'aS��.i c _ _ ' ' ' - ' _ ' ,ixr�� - `_ ".:.:3s:i;.Zts::--.�: , .,.�-s� %_ . .-`. __ -� �r.y,�.y..... - _Y � _ . ,. ,.... �r� - � e» . - - � :�c ..','�sa'� - . ,arr. _ :t.+,, ��..� �« j:3: b'=�' � _ . ...-, � _'�e F __. . I . w ..._. � . ... �� . �._ . .. _ .vi+ •T 1' .� Ti..� .. _ -. . � �_ .wki- i<''2�i.t� ^i,�q'i'1s{..'.T.a� __ _��`. ... � �_ .�.? _ .^`.. �^`4;.w � ��.,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _._-_ _ �a. .�r �a T..�.I� :»2:��L: . .. ':..X'.�'� 2C...._ _ .��.vl-.::�. . . a �. - . "_ �. _ ...._ . .. ... _ . . . _ . 4e�a+� •$_:•n-• - " ' ' ' ' _ - �:Y.�F�_.r`: ..�. �KY_""�.""=:.1-.:sE�w_'__- ' - - « '_ _ ' _ '• it� M��^F�df h=�y^.:»=x'l.'• 'i ''.""" c�� . 'a! '�.s� . ' ' ' ' " ' , ' ,;,ry� " " 'Yk_�.T"^ �..�'...��=:.T:. •'3' _ ,`y:! _. -, " '.. "_ ' ..��i='..':�y.a:" . , .... . ._ ' _. _ _ _ - . ' ' _ J . _ i j =�.w�., _ �...�� j3. .. "�., Y%�y ' Y _ _' �^,q«y,^� '' :e " .. Tr _ �LL " r - p. na .. _ -f_ . , _ . _ ' _ � ... �. . .,.. :t�' "�`-f. . �. _ �.. " " . ' - � `� - � I1Y '�'Y . i �"��. ,�, ,,.,, „� . � . .w, ..�.,P .. . ._. . , ... e.. - N^��r•`.;...' . ` .. :TI. .. -.. t ' . .. �',,...�(::�.' �:r:a�_i _ � � ... ._. .�....� _: .k�e_a �..r.a:.e�w..w..r ..w�n.n.+�•- ., v.:4.tY�Y.s�."� . "......`'1%..r:i�.. -- • � �az^,vY�iw�n...rri..��..�-•s- m 3� � ^� e�: g°SYr3" a: f" js'�13' A 1 4 p ��''� Y� 0 J' . J� �= aA� ;• tA .. � � � ::1. W . � �• tl ^1 �� =„or .. �. �� ' o� '� ^^p ��'q1' � d''' ` �O% 9 �/ `'�ap �� .'� �z�� ',Z .,y�,1r4o ' Z op�0 � �� p�d�� t'% •� tp � -; r .t �.• �,.. � `y�!' '-, � � o� p0 t 7� p O' w Nw p' 00 • -f � ' ••,• � `� .., rt O + %, � .�3 p , °},� Fj � � " ` •r� � L..�.S t r:; . '',:i � tp. .-- 4�0..�. ,� r� . ~~�"� � 4iY� � ¢ �' S � �4��'� ••.::.`.i-� ."-- "� � s� �� S oyM 1�� «�O � Nt'O�y p.LT � ��j` ��; 4 l �° w o N/ �iTo ; ��• _ ►pe;._- — ,i f ,2 H' •�� ` `,o c ; A �y j�,; ,Z''p�!' r �. ,�°°'o4W `, tio�.ti��.�-� `� J a �`� �� v�� , �'+ � � a' �'Qo�, + Q Q N / : � � 3. pp""�-� ... ..--' •.- 11 , 'o ¢ aW ^ �� 3 , 4/ p� �tik_.. .n 3}•.�i1.4i �l.16 ( �./� q .� : Q` '• �1 ' � �o,., ph �`' pp � r► 4 s��yp,ao sr � — � N a 0 � 1 g l ' � ^� 1 .� ��; s, .: �- � .. � '—�. � ,n �; �j � �R� o `Z 8 � N � N,� % S o o �, 0 �; r�; ` f`�,° _ .�.t p �j'G. � � h +, .5 " � '` 3 ° � ,, -. �' � !` f o � v ;;: i::�.� �` ^ s�T'oo'�„ �'M Q '%�'}, e � Q` „°°�t ,� l/9,�5 o'w"' 3� r f� 4'•r �C' �1•�y'Qo�� d � 3p,...M, �� ,{1 � Q ►11.ao W� po , ;.� aS s9�``:� � � 30 ,�!,�i p iiL.3t . � �`"s`^s,� d 3p `� �0 / t� �' ,� a� '�' � 4 � �N � `^ st/ / Q �9'r"" `+ N �... � � �, Q� ' �y01: -yQ' 6 a'�' � �. .�f/ Q � S o N � Q S � � pa¢S ` ,,, N ` ;,f~ 6 ,� � � � �` 8 � � d N ' '"� � t ~ �.�'�o ° 0 t `' r' '� 3s' f'S� - ' �� '0 4 .,' • ° M r`�� 0'8 � ' /�� h , �v J � � s4� �,8 0 "_' �t µ � M a � .� � �o•oo�c° �'4=' , o� a:3a•�,�o4.s.co SE. ° 8 ,� ,� ;ru,� ti� 1 o d� rr cF � „ � 3;. �� lt hpNs�00�p� µ ��.�� o �(�� o�('�- � 8�•"' � r'o a `�' �� 4!' �, mQ' ►� /��+�0• \ ok �p� ' t� � Q�H^%� rr ��ff r20+ �O� ! ; 3T"y� d � ` � .1 ��\� �„� .Rso 9 ' � 6i o°Or'W� ^0 4 � k �A �f l4535° � �'► � N ' ` t! �^.'� N �.Q ,Q 4 ± + $�r o t �`�.. o � � �', 30 �` �'� �`�"�-#,\,Q � �74i : �Q � lrq9� �o"W / w. � iA ! � M p d i ' '� � b �� 1 °° h'i 3� � `c� O�' , � � � "i , �'� � � y � ` . � ° v _� i� � �• r .� � ,� � �n r !� � ��'� at r � �% .`':' .00 { r : i l��oeSQ, �" ^, �� n%a v a�v � , ~ n M '�• �� 4 _ ,�;:•� o ° �o'� �a',', • � a�s :�O o' , a �^,i �v 2'�: :' `� � t �i � 4 4 � a `' E, , �y �'y � "'�'m ok i 'y^r� "' �' �' ` �6 v qi � 0 ! � � � .1; o� v� � ya' ,• �� oo . 04 �'�� ti" �o • �s 4.�Oo n o .?2.3.�7 p` N o� x �4 � � � �'��.�� :•• � '�,� s � jo�� o �,,,�, c j,��, /,� ° ktjo ,,, 43.Q o ,� � , 11Q• � ;:r. �� a � 3 ` t ty �� o o �� ..� . : � � , . � ; � � y � 0 3�4� f �y ��8 , .,,� Qo° q � � tn / i Q�sQ o,,� f o 3 _. � � � ��,Q ! a.. �j � 6-d, p,yo. 2 V � , o v v� 0° ��r/ �,4 �' �'- � 2`(� c' Z `� 4a" ,h� o° °� 3pq� -2 0� 0'� �, t �'. � o w' Q � V � � • p� �, J` � t t�• y.��^/ �� ¢ry 3p � � �5 p j �'y � � * � � ,• �� oa `� � 4' °,. N� � � � � �� v ." ;� �,� % i � � o! ? * � �,,. P . S-��o.00:� � �� q. ..-j4a 1b r,� � �a �QS,ay `� � 3 ` N '�3 �$�C � °j �0� . . ~ .. , � ��, � . ��,� �••�o ,:, oo� 4'f '`� � . ., $, . 9 0 �o °� � `�, 25 � �" .1 , . ,`�., '�'�'�, .,, �n � ' s + \ �..--- --- , O - � ` � : P � �-- '0 � � t � � . .op �!�'9.p�s2 �4s� �?'.�C' E, ti �OS �v � ... , i..' • I � N�`o ��, �, � 3p•4' s � �� 3'� '43• �� • ':, �:.• �� °"f .} r`s � � �;� `, , ,.. �� 1' . � �' �. 1 f . � �-� . 3 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Apri1 2, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City s ator Y '' � FROM: James E. Danielson - Public �Tarks Director SUBJECT: Adrian Setback Variance Case No. 87-Ob DISCUSSION: At their March meeting, the Planning Cammission considered a 30 faot front yard setback variance f ar Ed Adrzan {See attached staff inemos}. It was men.tioned in the staff �report that the constructa.on would alsa need a wetlands permit, however subsequent measurements on �he wetlands map proved that a wetlands permit is not needed. . RECC�N[MENUATION � The Planning Cammissian vated unanimausly �o recommend ta the City Council that the requested variance be gran�.ed. - o ACTION REQUIRED• Review the request with the..applicant and if Cauncil desires ta imple- ment the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion ap- proving a 3{} faot front yard setback variance to allow reconstruction af the existing breezeway at 1549 Dodd Raad. , � � N[ARCH 17 , 19 $ 7 � FROM: CITY C}F MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Planning Commi�sian Jim Danielsan and P.W. Directar Paul Berg Code Enfarcement Of�icer SUBJECT: Case No, 87-06, Adrian, Variance and Wetlands Permit DISCUSSIdN: Mr. Ed Adri.an, 1549 Dodd Road, lives in one of the oldest hame� in Mendata iiea.ghts. The hau�e i� situated so that it extends over the lot lines alongc� Dodd Road and Faurth Avenue. Because of that, it does not canform to the City'� current setback requirements and i.s an existing non-confcsrming structure. Befare staff is ab].e to grant a building permit �or major constru.cta.on an a non-canforming structure, a variance wauld need to be granted. Tha house also is within 100 feet of a designated wetland�. Mr. Adrian, along with the reconstructian�of the existing " �amily room, wi�hes to construct a three seasan porch. THe proposed construction is within 40 feet of a drainageway and will enaroach on the wetiands setback by 60 feet, and will require a wetlands permit. The existing�family raom i,s constructed right on the property line (zero �oot setback). To allow reconstruction, a 30 foot frant yard setback variance needs to be cansidered. ACTIt"�N RE4UIRED: Review with the applicant the wetlands permit and variance request and make a recommendat�.on to the City Council. , � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: � APPLICANT: LOCATION: � ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIUERATIONS: 24 March 1987 87-06 Edward J. Adrian Southwest Corner of Fourth Avenue and Dodd Road (see sketch) Approval of Variance to Setback Requirements and Wetlands Permit 1. The property in question is a very old metes and bounds property (not a platted lot) along which there is a very olct red brick house, garage, and breeze way, portions of which appear to be built on or over the lot lines. You will notice in the attached sketch by the applicant that the property is 126.49 feet by 201.07 feet which forms a triangle with the southeasterly leg being contiguous to Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road). Our base map does not indicate the extra wide right-of-way indicated on the applicant's � sketch. However, according to the applicant, there appears to have been some question as to the exact location of the right-of-way as it relates to the Trunk Highway. We suggested that the applicant attempt to determine the right-of-way by working with MnDOT officials and/or a surveyor. In any case, it would appear�that variances to the setback to the north and east would be necessary in order to add on to this structure. 2. The applicant, Mr. Adrian, notes that he proposes to rebuild the existing breeze way which is currently subject to considerable dry rot. He also proposes to add an 8 foot by 20 foot screen porch on the south side of the breeze way. Though the house is located contiguous to or across the prop`erty lines as a nonconforming use, the repair of the breeze way would be allowed without Council action. However, adding to the structure is not allowed (being a nonconforming building) unless variances are granted to eliminate the nonconforming use classification of �the property. 3. Though the existing house is located close to the public highway, it appears that its location does not hinder the function of the roadway itself. Hopefully, prior .to the Planning Commission and Council hearings, more definitive information can be obtained regarding the location of the Trunk Highway right-of-way as it relates to the original house. - � EDWARD J. ADRIAN, CASE 87-06 PAGE 2 4. Obviously, it would appear that adding the 8 foot by 20 foot addition to the existing breeze way does not in and of itself constitute a problem since there is ample land area around the proposed addition. We calculate the approximate land area based o� the dimensions indicated on the drawing to be 14,415 square feet. Unless later locations for the right-of-way indicate that the lot is larger, a varianc.e to the 15,000 square foot lot size would be required to eliminate the nonconforming status of the parcel. 5. The improvement and preservation of ..this home may be a historical significance to the City We are not aware of the exact date of construction of this home, though it would obviously appear to be one of the earlier residences constructed in this area of the City. 6. There has been an application for a wetlands permit in this case. However, it would appear from the examination of the wetlands map that the system. stops approximately 100 feet from the property �on the west side. There is a drainage way which proceeds westerly to the south of Fourth Avenue. The inap, however, indicates it not to extend so as to impact the property in question. . Attached is a copy of the wetlands system. The applicant has indicated the property in question in a shaded tone. • !_� a I �� SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH T SCALE 1"= 800' .:;: :,. : �': �::=� -- :��: . D:�;• n.. .. � , , o .. - , • , , • � Case No. l� �—� � � • .. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � _ � } : Y _. ` ' ... , _.DAKOTA� COUNTY , MINNESOTA 4•�_,. . � � - ... ., .. � - � - . :,:^,,�..�.; ;,, . _ _ ..,_+ _.., „ ,. ;. :.._ , . :: � . -... - , ��w� _ � ''t` �-w'"�='� APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION � � �- '"=-- ��.-� " ' ' � •."'','a. ....:� '.. .�: r . rJ'yS .+: ��/ �jY._ ' .� �.._ "ltiL"a:.1:-e ^,..z . . . .F•_ ..`�..•'. a., - � :� N^ - � - ��"� Jr� -i:f ��:; ,r�,f�...+ a�.>..,..�}' _ � , y•V ,�':'��Y'`Eb.i.�:s:,, - �,:7r.�...:.�i`�...x�E�.��.�1`�i,a.��i,.41ir��f�Y�r'� y�l �+ .:�-'.-�.,.....:�_ i .,,v.,.v�+ s..,� �'ii�k'�} Ys`" . . . ., -` : _ . ry � Q' ,• y�ra,-',� � F.jh.�.�T,�r ''.:.r.x �'`«.'� A 6 "t� �' - � � ...'i.,`.i: • � ..: e �'�; - { . � '_" �' ;"'3' ' . • . � ' •;�; "a; PLANNING REQUEST �`. •,.;';txr�r, � � . .. '.. ' . �...._.,.__.....>_...,..._...� . .,s..«-y.�,_....:....:e.,��:.� :'� :.-�:'7�.,«i�:4., �.. , . ..��,y,. ._. ' , - " - 4 � ,'„ ""_ . _ . _ - _ -_ '" - µ;;,#= f' -','. =s,r'f • ".�.^�- " �:, _ Date of Application 3 �5� � % � ..Y°::}=:..:a�».o�..f�.,..�.,...;f.A;,.�.,;�;�t_ �..::;�,.::,s»�.,:;.::`.::.;.�:'":,:;ti' W,.,•�: .,��-,.:+"..�,;°..,.:...�y.�w;..::a..._._n� Fee Paid ,J,S-0�" • /�vd9o� t - a"N �r 3� . . '�"�i ' �;5�,.. ,.. r'J�'m �A licant a `� "�`� �: '=`-:..� ::;:.�� ;�:�,:-., . ,:�}: � _. " -�=-ti�:��" ; :. -�--�- ' ,.. - � . . i ... � fJO�2I ,�,� z �' _ k.::. �� ..�-,.-� .:-. � _ Y�� _ , ,.. �. ,: �.. � PPName: �- �/!/--�",,.;��,�:;'-�;,n� fj ...,•.�:,,�,.._._- . J . - - . '��`- . ��xk; _;�;u;-.�,�.:,> ,..a,.-<.-First -T� -�-. ,�-4��,. �. Yjlnitial -� ` i - _ - . -. Last ;E _�:_. �� M ' � _ , r� - �� .'R''=' � ' . t' , r . -Y „ - " _ 'f ., jil:t3i:4Yr.T . 'n'i��-Y�"�r, yi ��Zvr .- .._.. . �- � � � P �.. Addre s s : � /� �i%. � � 00.(� � /e0 • /yE.�ll> O//� ��S' • /�/.t��fJ �S �/l� � Number & � City State - . • Zip - , ��;xF:,. _. ... ,�t=Street�:M.:��s�-� �:�s:�: . u.. �. .�C:Fy�.•a'�.M._I 3� _��.: .. . . " '�� ' � Yr."..:,, ;s'; - r . .. . r,.R'�`i'Y :.L� _� :._'v. . . . , " . _ '.k� /�� 7 ' S:' , ` ' � ..'1 :{ : :�i Telephone Number: ?%� }/ -�`c/ t'/7 ' -� "';``.. ~ " . . .• � .s - - . � . , , • ' � ti;. . ._- .. •: .. ,� •. _- . .. . . . Owner n . - � • '. - . Name s � ` /7�ie/�if%� � ` � ��' ��-�-•�,�� - - " J — � ~ . Last - , • • •, First -. � , Initial ' - a .S 5r . . , . � Address: /��%--�0�1� -iC'�• � �/'%EyDvTA /S�T�S.�•��%�/.v.v . SSJ%�' - Number & Street - � ,� �City , , , , State • Zip , � Street Location of-Property �in Question: , - . . " . ' ' '-`, . " _ „ _ _„W..,� . , _ , r:-'� ` " .4•,'1a , �( ..rti, ' = � �" .f� . , . � i �'1�.:.aa.-1 .4 '-f�c�� .�i:7 ' i:!:,j�.: ia ., �� / /// y` � r' .... ' + . _ ." ... , � - Q v�� o. � i .'G D,�,v�,� oF -�y �/ � " : . ` � :.'. � � . Legal Description of Property: �.-�...�-~r,. �,r^;: . . . . ::._� , r :.. `�>�_.-�">:�:"�.` :F:•' ."r:R;_' :�; - .'S��";'•• . _ .. ..,.. 1� - � "Ti�`Ar :�i�,eT -of:i;� vrs '.y % ��.v� z ; �.-;,B.t oc� 5! ..,-j = % ;"�S�I�Ti%s :�,:��.SyB. �o. z � _ _ ... ._ .. ... . . . .. ._ - ._ _ _. _,! yi�Cy - ,� I9�sT Of 7h'� . -. -i�%O�Tf/ - S d � T//~ �Q �l f �h'. Tc � .0 /i(% �� .. <S"t cTio.� --a 5�� % �d'N. --~%� a � u� � �� ' � _ _, - �`R � � � � : �`; � '=�� . _ . - . --.-� ____� . �_.r _.__ --t.__._.._ . . . _ . .�«,�.-.,. _, . - '- - < - - - � - � - ----- . . , . ., a� _, _ _....,,�;��. . . � - .. y� -�.�� _ -_. � . .__ ��. • � - . �--- ---a-.�. . • - ,. . - -- _- � _ -. . , , . , .� , . . . Tyge of Request. -' Rezoning .' _� , -' _ - - ... . _ . _ _ ' _ �, _:.: . _..�. �`'....-.. .. -�- �-�-- Variance ,:._..' = > ' ,-: ' :t�. .� ._ `` � _ , ' - . . .. .� . - ' ;° . ,,:,.- �.,.R� ,:�..; ,� ..c. ., . v:;� l. . ��-�' - -.- . - - Conditional^Use�Permit • ,_ - . . :. : �'�� - ._, . - ' � ` `- ' " � Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. -' .r •. .- . ....- _- , , ----~• --~•��---- rtinor Conditional Use Permit , �.,�z.;� , . ' ' ..: ,_ � - .. . ._ __ ...' _ - - - -.,t _. Subdivision Approval v a, �::-M . .- ,. r. u� � :t . ...... • . .. �,. ..,T :i z - -':�.. . . . ,. :` , °,. _ �;:: -,,• , - . . � Plan 'Approval • - -- _ . - � ''� . • _ � , .� " �' 4 5s..b:' . .:�. � .. � , ' Wetlands Permit��.�.•~� h�� ;��yt� ' ;;' • zf i .�,7' � "`'�i �r;,;��.',� e.'.':i.� , _''rti�=. ,.•- ' - - .. -.:�«'" . _ .. - . .. . -� _� . .. .. . . . Other - - - ,,, . ..�; ' ' ,. . f_ lA.,'�3sY.Y• M14 k - y� ., .��1:..� .. .Ci .f'i:.�i !„'i?� a.�.:+Y.fi�:fy'�,��r:,.'t.l� �'.5%:�?� . `~'qr,.. :.�f=. .+r�..'-T�•-: - _ '?,,..�::�_ ... ��-�":•-`� n • - - , ,. _, . , "` .._ -- . �_ :. -. r-_�u'x��l••r!` - . , Y ' ' ... .. ' '- { - - . - - - . � - + " . . - , c - _ - , ., - . ' , �'r..,.... Y.: - - _ - " " - • ... _ ' ' _ _ � `"-i1s,-: �1_ _12ay_' - ' w'}" ' .. ._ _„ _ . .... _ .. �. .. .. . " � S' . � YJ�•�•;!�' ' ' � z.. " .fi�-- � � ..� .'tiw...:�:r� .4. �.. . �' �� i�` -Y?� t 'S�". ' '>fs ' 'i"'`n�3"� � ..t: _...., _` .. ..,. _ � r ' - . . _ iv . -. .. , r'; y: _ ' ' ^- , .. _. ' . � _ . .. .. «. �-_ . . ' ' _ .. .._ _r , . ...�._r �� .• _ _ - i4i: ��S' -? .._ - _ - _" - ' - .�. , '3r:„�- � .�t, _ - -• ..-. _.... .. _.. .= .�.`-.._ • .� _ • i . � . - ..'. l __.4'."}_;. .._.. _- . _• _ .• �^ - • . ._..` .. . .' : ..._ =^�^ - � i: .' - .ir , ��i- . .:i}"�F�7S'T. ",`( r.�. 't-�"l'• --... .. .� -s'- —� ' - . - -...' ` '`'.f_: ' '_" ' � " - =' - - . ' -.- ' , ; • "' , ' . " -_ "' . � - • '- ' . �_s_ ,� ., . .:, _ -�.. . . .. . ,�.�... . ..� .. �_. " � " " � a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � April 2, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and Cit i is r or ' - FROM: James E. Danielson �- Public Works Director SUBJECT: KiZburg Se�back Variance Case Na. 87-07 DISCUSSION• Mr. Jim Kil.burg purchased a lat fram Mr. John Lappako along the narth side of Cheri Lane adjacent to Dodd Road. According to City Ordinance the required front yard setback an the 1ot is 72 feet. Mr, Kilburg felt that was excessive and requested a 32 foot variance so that he could construct a home at a 4Q faat se�bacic {see attached staff inemos). REC4MMENDATIQN• � Th:e Planning Commission felt the 32 foot variance was no� in keeping wi�h the neighbarhood and voted unanimaus�y to recommend only a 12 foot variance, putting the home at a 60 foo� setback. - ,. ACTION REQUIREU• If Council desires to imp7.ement the Planning Commission recommendation they should pass a motion approving a 12 foot front yard variance for 819 Cheri Lane. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO _.. _ MARCH 17, 1987 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg ` P.W. Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Case No. 87-07, Kilburg, Variance DISCUSSION• Jim Kilburg is proposing to construct a new home for his family on Lot 33, Linden Addition, which fronts on Cheri Lane. Al1 of the houses on the north side of Cheri Lane are setback 60 feet or greater from the front property line (see attached map). There are two existing vacant lots to the east of Lot 33. The lot immediately west of Lot 33 has a home constructed on it at approximately 1�0 feet of front yard setback. The lot depth is 218 feet. The Ordinance provides for a front yard setback to be either at the established setback (130 feet) or 1/3 of the lot � depth (72 feet) whichever is less. Mr. Kilburg feels that the 72 � „ foot setback is excessive and asks that the City grant a variance _ to allow him to have a 40 foot front yard setback. In the � applicant's request, he cites that he would have the hardship of f having to destroy a mature walnut tree. � ACTION REOUIRED: Review with the applicant the proposed variance and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/PRB:madlr attachment , � ■ , � i!'/ �� j �`� ' 1 �� .'_��_ �.�'�L.' i�� 9 i�� ':`-�_:'��c�'� —�:,�+..C"1 a� �w+_�F'.u'.:�'�LCIi`'� 1.'! �= ii : 1��\��t•:: - � _ . . i�F1!f.•.� CJr�� if �" f V' � . ��,�� ,t J We have been as�ed by the City of Meridota Iieights to i.nform you that we have purchased the lot at 819 Cheri. Lane and intend to build a single �amily home for our family. � , The setback requireznents s�.ate that we4 must stay sixty feet ' minimum from the front of the�pro�erty lin"e; Hecause of the con-- tours o� the•.lot and �he iacaiian af a large walnut tree, we are asking �or a thirty to' for�y foot �etback. Thi.s wa.11 allow u� cc►n- side�abl.e savings in excavating costs and enable us to save this � beautiful tree. � , The variance process requires that we�secure your � �.ndicate you have na objections to.our proposal. ` ,' • . ' � " ,, . signature �a . . �"� � -- � /� ' . . . : Y SIG URE DATE � �..,L� %�� "t � � . , ' . . ' ' * ' , - - ' ADDRESS- , � : . _ � ' . ' l%�'/ti��'�'�/i : ��'2""` YOUR SIGNAT E � . �'� � c�.�-2ti.,' �a-� �.:�� . ADDRESS . • .. r. ��"tJ r , YpUR SIGNATURE .� . �Ll�` � C�'.�� -ADDRESS ' . A� • a OUR �IG A'P R �c"�s �C' �•.�"_- � __ _G_ �_��_______._. ��»t��;5:�� -��=/�-�g7 � � .� � � �. DATE . ' , .. `�"' •'_S 1J� ` l.i � 4`• • DATE , '� 0 :� J'� � � � r DATE . �I'hank you, JIM AND SAM KILBURG � . � �.w_..... ---�--. � ♦ �� .�.w..j _ _.._ . ��,.. ...� . � �_. _.�..,�.��. .�,... . t,. � . t:: � . 1 �.' `t�;;: . }{� _ �.._,._.._.. , �-�r�+� ��a-d -�.a �� , r�d a� d� � 4� -----__.___ ��``f's ,'�;, � , ' � �� ' � � � � ---- t - . . . ,�or---i ,� w;� j .� ,a;ov� r j. J }P N� i N �� Q� ! � �� 1� $01 � �` � � ' I �' $ . ��3 �oi .. �t�d • � ' s Pal �r� ; � - - ' ;t�i�x3 � A� ,�, � ` - ' �P •��{ i ' ~ � \ _ "- � ./ �+7 �.i01 .� o%� _.. __.... pjZy fi I..J ,. ` „ "'' kI Nd : {�". ,,.� ' � -�:�rav�d .n �w 3.t�dW� � �l�d. _ �n! . -„�,pN �,. 1_ ; � -�"��1 Za! �aa�y-`o:,v? _ I _ , 'ddt9�� d �� -�' + - �� \ • ' � o •�o� �a.b�-� w tll i�,.,,,,, 2 ru !' �o�lA'��+�1�� _�_� �£ � r��.� �� 0 1 �� -- <�._�. �- , e 0 1 PLANNIN� REPC?RT DATE: CASE NUMBERi APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REGIUESTED: • .. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 March 1987 87-07 James F. Kilburg _ Westerly of Dodd Roaci, Narth of Cheri Lane (see sketch) Approval of Variance to Front Yard Setback 1. The Kilburg's propose to build a house on L.ot 33 af the Linden Addiiion, which includes a series of Iots to the west each of which is - 100 fe�t in width and 218 feet 4 inches in depth. The homes in the subdivisior� were canstrtseted approximately 60 feet back fram the front right-of-way. The City's zoning ordinance requires that in a single-family area, a new hame musi conform to ihe existing setback established in a block of residences even though those residences may be setback more than ihe 30 foot r�inimum required. Thus, in this situation the required setback would be equal to the existing homes in the block. It appears that in this case that distance is 60 feet. 2. Attached is a copy of the statement submitted by Mr. Kilburg indicating his desire to "mave the house fram ihe rrtinimum bF] foat setback farward 20 to 30 feet". He notes that this would eliminate the need io destroy a large walnut tree which he indicates is the only tree on his property. 3. In a case Iike this, the preservation of a significant tree is a ' worthwhiile objective. However, if the result of the location of the home pratrudes farward to the exient that it appears "out af place" this may be a problem. This is a subjective matter and the input from the neighborE�ood can be helpful in deiermining its solutian. � 4. The Kilburg application does not indicate the exact location of the walnut tree and certainly this would be heipful in deter.mining the _ - merits of this case. It would be helpful if inembers of the Planning Gammission and Council couid view this site sa as to ascectain the visual conditions, as they relate to the existing homes and the impact on ihe walnut tree. 5. You will note, from the attached site plan drawing, that the home is proposed ta be setback 16 feet from either side lot line which amply conforms ta the side lot setback requirements. 6. Attached is a copy of the aerial photo of this area of the City which is not easily read; however ifi indicates the locatian of th�; exisCing hames as they relate to this property owner's proposal. �. �, —�- ,. r :�.,� O�\ :."r ��'}� "'w� e y E yv �'`y_ " c'��z.��: . �_a'.� . • • . . . a�_- . ��F �; �� ; ��",'� i i) a 1 � yC �� +�:�II:��Ai�Ia\�::i1�i ..;...��1 hT Z'"'�.n�l - __ _ _ _ � �'�";��i'I�t -�Q--r-� � � ,T.,.� �� .�,:�' � f � �Y�.Zn.`.� T ...�.t.. ( I v ,�;� �,Y � � .� � � t.. . ,�` �� 1i # * f _ _ .�� i 1 _ � } `' ��_ ' �� " _ _ . � s '.� ,�.�� I, � � /� � � , �o� � _ � � � �Z.��.1�� _ , � p �� .. . �u � ''� � ��E?�� A I � � _ ►,� � �rr�,i _.� �; ati �� ,� -�pi�" ,� �� _ - �0��Ir��\��I� • � �a � •� �► �- ��'7�_111�111o0Pa1� . �. . o � oo��H►� �. _ . . ,` �� o a��`�►: � _ _ �- ��res:�ee�eeeeee�e�► o;� �� a,.o = ._ _� ,� o . o.�. _ ��0000��00000�l�� .. �ep��op v��e ��p�4 �zo ■ooi�000000�� ; . h � a's �O�opqO � � �� _ -, '� o �v o:o� . � _� �oo�'��►�. ''� ab � � - �r� v�-v y � v ��vo!� .�!oo ��e��dO�p Op0 �; ��`A �� r�o;;vo� ��.00 z�d � �, OO �, � � ��.��0 �=,,.so < � p �� ab� � � �*ii �- ::,.. �<.,�°o��p s�� IO s�� oo . �:,T , �� I�� s.��''unnrl� �- a� . .., . . , q ' V �_ �;1 .��N�( � � � � �� S � � � �, i i `�� ti� ` _ �,,��"� r;� '� M�.;�� e ��57�..-�%�'�:�� a, � �4� �, V �;,�� ., ��; �:..�-� - 0 �� .=��;. ..� � ��'� �� . �� '�= �� ` �� . � 1�e ��1�.��3-,.�;'•f'-�,�,�'i'i�5�•• �r.�nr.r��"�'.r:� �".�'��I,� ,� ��,�. r � �-- ';��\,�a �<�o'a"^sS3:.'£43"'..ED: . -..�� . ~G'..3.��a�x�+�� " a �`a3+3� � - i. . awaE.7�1�i.�r�'.�'�L��t::c(ax.e*nv.. ��a-�nct��ir�'�'`.iw,✓',C�4�� .�' , x . �K�^•�arasars,v� 9ili�l�l'i+t1'frS"dt�"...L" �s•Y... a a�C,L - .�.!�`d"„��!F.�'+ar�elr�'��"'..�3i�3�'��r,-+•--• �' e ��•..�... � - �.Bi`,�I �- ii'�•`-`i , sw.`:�",��.,�s�..a��' y �.. sst 1 n� � � L�€�a�.�'� . / ��'. , . . '`'�`�� J��" � L 'Sn'�!r �. A Z�;,r�r ;.�c�� R� .�i:r �n ��'��T�'.�'� �/p,,. ~ ^� , • gn . ' �.7'� Sn�i� • •. , . q ��y: ��'"%(a `� �..`�� y.s'r�'/' x � � � �� . ` �t. . � � � � � <. � ��'y � .L. i � , ;� � t�i CITY OF MENDOTA xESGHTs MEMO APRIL l, I987 TO: Mayar, City Cauncil, and City x�trator FROM: Paul R. Berg Code En�orcement Ofiicer SU&TECT: Exemption from Perfarmance Bond Request, Ordinance #501, Section 5 DISCUSSIdN• Gene and Kathy Winge are proposing to move anto their lot located at the intersectian on TH 110 Service Road and Knob Road, a newly constructed home. (See attached letter o� request from the Winges}. This home has been canstructed and inspected by the lacal authorities in Eden Prairie. Documentation will be provided by the Winges for sta�'f review. The purpose o� the performance bond�as required by - Ordinance No. 501 (copy at�ached) is to insure that the moved in structure will be in compliance with current zoning and building code requirements. Past history has been that moved in houses have been 20-30 year� in age and the performance bond becames necessary. In the case of a newly constructed home, the bond requirement doe�n't seem necessary. RECt.3MMENDATSdN • Staff feels that the Winges request is a case in which the waiving of the per�'ormance bond should be considered. ACTIdN REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation to waive the performance bond requirement, it should pass a motion of approval. ` PRB:madlr attachments SECTION 5. PERFQRMANCE BOND - Befare a building moving penni� shall be issued providing far the moving of a building, house or structure to a locatian within the corpora�e limits of the City o� Mendota Heights, the applicant must provide the City with a pe�formance band in ,form satisfactory to the City guaran�eeing that the applicant will promptly complete construc- tion of the house, building, ar structure so maved so that the same will meet al1 of the provisions of the Ci�y Building �ode as well as any ather applicable ardinances of the City. Such performance bond shall be in an amount�equal to 1S0 percent of the cast as determined by the City Code Enforcement O£ficez neces�ary to cover the canstruction af such improvements.. The improvements of said building, house or structure shall include but sha11 not be limi�ed ta the �flilowing : 5.1 Painting: Painting all. ex�eric�r walls, doors.and doar frames, windows and window frames as requa,red by the City Cade En�orcement O�ficer. 5.2 Roofing: Install or cause to be installed new roofing whenever in the opinion of the City Code Enforcement t?ffzcer the existin.g roof is unsightly, dilapidated or leaking. . 5.3 Gutters: Construct, install or cause ta be installed adequate roof gutters and down�pouts•u�on such building, house or structure. 5.4 Grading and Sadding. Install or cause to be insta3led a finish � =grade on a1.1 parts of the premises onto which such building, house or structure is moved including the planti.ng, or install.ation of iive sodding on all parts of the plot or parcel involved. .. - -s 5.5 Landscaping: Install or cause to be installed prnper landscaping _ upon the premises onto wha.ch such buzlding, house or structure : is moved of a type and nature comparable to the landscaping in �M- the immediate neighborhoad o£ the lo� or praperty to which such buildinq, house or structure is maved. tsaZ} � 5,6 Drainage: Con�truct and provide all necessary and proper drainage upan the property upan which such building, hause or structure is to be situated in accordance with a plan , submitted by the applicant and appraved by the City Cade Enforcement O�ficer. 5.7 General Constructionr Update and improve aI.I. plumbing, heating az�d electrical equipment to meet then current specifications as se� farth i.n the Gity Building Cade as well as ather applicable ordinances. SECTION 5. ISSUANCE OF PERMIT 6.]. No building moving permi� shall be i.ssued under the provisions o� this ardinance praviding far �he maving of a bui.lding, house, or structu.re to a locatian within the corporate limits of the City of Mendota Heights unless and until the Code Enfar�cement O�ficer i� satisfied that the buildi.ng, house or structure proposed to be maved con�orms to the gensral character and type o£ architecture consisten�c with the immediate neighborhood of . . _. . . _ , _ . _ . - _ , _. -, - , -- _�__._�,�..�,. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS • April 2, 1987 � TO: Mayor, City Council, City ��ator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SU&TECT: Marriatt Corporatian Liquor License Application INTRODUCTION The Marriott Carporation plans to open its Mendota Heights Courtyard Hotel faciZity on May 18th. In preparation for apening af t�ha fa�i.Iityr they have submitted an application for Limited Serva.ce Hote1 on-sale liquor license and Sunday liquor license. The purpose of this report is to inform Council on the status of the application investigation and ta recommend authorizatian to advertise for the required hearing. • DISCUSSION ' I have reviewed the voluminous license application and find it to be camplete and in aom�l.iance with Ordinance requirements. Chief Delmont has begun the znvestigation an princi.pals of the corporatian and an the individuals who will be responsible for local management af the �acility operations, including property management, food and beverage management. The results af the investigation to date are very pasitive, as was Dennis" visit to the facility with a Marriott representative. The courtyard facility is'the only one of its kind in Minnesata and this is our first experience with processing liquor applications. Far these reason�, Dennis and I believe that we shauld exerci�e extra care in investigating the application. We believe that Dennis should va.sit an out-of-state Marriott Courtyard (there are similar facilities in Chicago and Alexandria, Virginia) to determine that the small-scale restaurantJlounc�e trade volume matches that envisioned b� our Limited Service Hotel liquor license provisions. The ordinance provides for out-of-state investigations, the cost af which will be paid b�r the Marriatt Corpora�ion. We anticipate that the inve�tigation will be camplete and a full repart on the investigation will be available for delivery to Council within the next two weeks. Tn arder to process the applicatian within a time frame which will allaw a May 18th opening, the hearing an the application must be conducted on Apri1 22nd, and approval or denial must be made on May 5�.h. (The ordinance pravides that approval shall nat be made before .- the next regular Cauncil meeting follawing the hearing.) The full report will be delivered to Council at the earliest possible o�portunity after Dennis returns sa that Council will have adequate time to review the report prior to the hearing date. REC�MMENDATIQNjACTION RE4USRED We recommend that Council mave to authorize Chief Delmont to canduct the out-of-state investigation, establish a public hearing-on the Marriott Garporation application for Limited Service Hotel on-sale liquar license and Sunday Liquar License for "8:15 P.M. on Apri1 22nd and autharize staff to publish the required hearing natice in the Sun- Current. � � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 2, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City m��ator FROM: James E. Danielson - ' Public Works Director SUBJECT: Boyd & Jean Ratchye Deferment � DISCUSSION• Boyd and Jean Ratchye own a home adjacent to the Unruh plat and because the home is on a large lot, it has up to $35,000 worth of pending assess- ments against it. The Ratchye's are attempting to sell the property and prospective buyers or their lending institutions who call the City are informed of these pending assessments; when they hear the amount they have been getting cold feet. The Rachye property is not subdivided but has enough area to make 2 new lots. Staff has indicated to the Ratchye's that the Council normally allows deferment of assessments in these cases until the land is subdivided. Staff can not guarantee that the Council will defer any assessments so the Ratchyes have sent the attached letter requesting Council acknowledgement that the assessments will be deferred for them or a new owner until the land subdivides. RECOMMENDATION• � - Staff recommends that Council agree to defer the proposed assessments against f uture lots of the Ratchye property if requested at the time of the assessment hearing. ACTION REQUIRED• No formal action is needed at this time just a concensus of the Coun- cil. The project will not be done until late this year so the assessment hearing will not be done until 1988. , � , 1500 E. FIRST NATIONAI: BANK Bli1LD1iVG SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1391 March-24, 1987 Mayor, City-Council, City Engineer - and Mr. Howard Dahlgren City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Re: Rolling Woods Subdivision IMP. 86 PROJ. 9 Gentlemen and Ladies: We, Boyd H. Ratchye.and Jean C. Ratchye, own the house and existing one lot north of the proposed Mager Court in the Rolling Woods Subdivision. The street address is 1844 Dodd Road; our property is referred to in the second paragraph on the second page of Mr. Eckles' report of January 6, 1987 as "Lots N of Mager Ct. (2 new, 1 old lot)." - We own that prop�erty as one and wish to maintain it as such. On behalf of ourselves and any buyer from us, we jointly request that any pending assessments allocable on the two unplatted lots be deferred until such time as the lots are subdivided or the property is sold by a buyer from us. Ms. Jean C. Ratchye will attend the next City Council meeting and will be pleased to respond to any questions you may ask. We have jointly discussed this request in detail with Messrs. Dahlgren and Danielson while the developer of the Rolling Woods Subdivision made his presentation to the Mendota Heights Planning Commi.ssion: BHR:kb cc: Ms. James Danielson Very truly yours, Jean C. Ratchye Boyd H. Ratchye MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGXTS March 2, 198? To: Mayar and City Council From: `Kevin F e��ity Admini�trator Re: Parks Band Referendum The City has far some time been planning a Parks bond referendum for Tuesday, April 21st, 1987. The referendum pragram included over $1,000,000 for the Henry Sibley athletic camplex to be done in cooperatian with School District 197. Unfortunately, at their special meeting on March 3�st, the School Board failed to ratify the joint agreement between the City and the District which would have made this join� ef�art p�ssible. Given this change of events, it would be almost zmpossib2e to hold a credible re�erendum on April 21st. Previously advertised legal notices, and already printed ballots preclude us from changing the amount of the referendum. Since an alternative athletic facility site would most likely require dollars di�ferent than those reguired for Sibley, we could end up with in`sufficient funds. Further, we could not tell th� vaters what athletic facilities were planned, nar mount an adec�zate informational campaign, since our promotianal materials are all premised on the Sibley approach. Since March 31st, I have been contact by two members of the Schaal Board, Joyce Walker and Herb Strozznsky, wha indicated that they still support th� concept, and could vote for a joint agreement with some rnodifications. I responded that I wauld convey their feelings to �he Park� Commission and Council, bu� that 2 felt it unrealistic try to salvage anything for an �pril 22st referendum. It seems ta me that there are at least two very substantive issue� (i:e. property ownership and alcohol restrict�on) that need to be clearly resolved b� the City and District befare any cooperative agreement i� gaing to work. However, it appears that resurrecting the Sib2ey approach at sometime in the future is one option available. Because af the abave, it is recammended that Council adapt the attached resolution cancelling the April 21st reEerendum. We can then take time to rethink aur program, and the a2ternative� avaiiable to us. The Parks Gommission will be meeting in special session Monday evening, and will �orward a recommendatian ta the Council on how we should proceed. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the above recommendation, it should pass a motion adopting the attached RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO.-87 - 23. The Council should then consider�the recommendations of the Parks Commission on how to proceed. � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-23 WHEREAS, on March 3, 1987, Council ado�ted Resolution" No. 87-23, "Resolution Calling for an Election-on $1,860,000 General Obligation Bonds of 1987;" and WHEREAS, the purpose of the special election was to be to consider issuance of general obligation bonds to finance land acquisition and construction of an athletic facility on the Henry Sibley High School and adjacent properties under joint agreement with Independent School District No. 197 as well as community trail and park betterment; and WiiEREAS, the School Board of District No. 197 determined at its meeting on March 31st not to enter into said joint agreement; and WHEREAS, withdrawal of the School Board from negotiations has significant impact on consideration of park needs and financing; � NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that Resolution No. 87-23 be and is hereby rescinded, cancelling said special election at this - � time. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Seventh day of April, 1987. ATTEST: Kath een M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By C ar es E. Mer enso 0 Mayor � , MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT� � To; Mayor and City Council From: Kevin Frazell,�'��,�n�istrator Re: April 11th Workshop Ses�ion April 2, 1987 We are �cheduled for a goal setting warkshop session for Saturday, Apri.l 11th, at Mendakata Country Cltzb trom 9 to 12. The purpose is to update our two-year list of goal.s, since it was Spring 1985 when we la�t set goals, and we are reaching completian of the list. � � . My presumptian is that we will use a nominal group technique, sim�.lar to that used by Ly1e Sumek two years ago to generate our list. Staff is having a special meeting on Wednesday the 9th to generate our li�� af issues for Council consideration. For Chuck who has not previously been involved, and as a reminder to the rest, tha purpase of the exercise is not only to generate a list of issues and projects, but ta prioritize those into a manageable and doable work program. Therefare, you will want to be thi�nking about the level af priarity you personally would put on di�'ferent issues. Mendakota can serve hreakfast ta whaever is interested in arrivinc� a little early. Please let me know who's caming, and I wzll make reservatians accardingly. I also need to know if Council has any other abjectives it would like to accomplish at our meeting. Attached is a cop�r of the 1985 work program, updated far the second quarter of 1987. , TAiiGET ISSUES: 1987 .. MAYO[t 1�ND CITY COUNCIL • ' � CITY OL•' MGNDOTA IIEIGt1TS ' MAX, i 9tt5 " �. ...' ..�' � ti0. � T A R G E T I S S U E S 7. , t�. _. ...._. ._ _. � Top Prior�.ty TH 149 Task Force & MN/DOT � , i to make decisions Spring, ! 110 - 149 Commercial Development ? t$7. Work with Paster h , � Enterprises on commercial � . Rev iew study ' redevelopment. � . Determi.ne makeup and access to site � ' . Determine future direction . Explore methods af redevelopment - ' � shopping center, old fire station, etc. � . Attract services which reflect identity Growth and Uevelopment ' t . Explore oQtions and strategies - reflect �'alded into �7. � proactive apgroach � , becisions on strategies for city �. � . Study impact on city services � ' �� } City Hall � i . Comglet� stUdy . I Architect retained & budget .•Decisian - build or nat bui.ld adopted. Bidg. Committee . Uetermine site � develaps schemati.c plans & . I f "yes° , go fot i.t p i architects begin Plans & . Uetermine citizen involvement in proces s � Specs. . Itale ai� City Eiall to reflect city image and identity ' � Park Acqufsition and Development , . Update park plan � � Parks Commission & Council . Determine targets, what, when, where to recaasider program 3n � . Develop stages oE development lighC of 5chool District ' . Determine funding strategies decision not to approve , x Sibley agreement. . � Mary Wachtl,er Property - Acyuisition' , . � . Find aut evailability '• Decision made not to hold, � � . Determine whether city can afford it , Halley development pro- � . Decision ceedi.ng. � � . ACtioit Infrastructure � t tP � + StCeets Infrastruature replacement �4 + Storm sewers fund included in 1987 budget. " r ' F + Curbs and gatters _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. - - - r t . Develop fmprovement pragram for old infrastracture . � . Develop policy . Explare funding optfans . Establ3.sh stanctards for stzeets City Direction - Vision and Philosophy � . develop our visl.ott aiid direction Statement adopted by . Develop stateinent of our values and philasophy Councii. Need��to:decide . hlobilize supt.ibrt for visian on slogan. . Determi�e our image . . ` • ,. � ^ ? liigh Yriority Fire Department . Eocus problem areas - Chief, ather Eactian . Stvdy relah.ions to Police Department . Reduce autanomy feeling, develop strategies to bring into city as a de�artment . �aar�ss problem; F I-999 Carridor + Zoning + Planning - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t . DeEermine zoning . Decision an city's rale - reactive and proactive . Determine direction . Explare possible restrictions {e.g., aircraft naise, etc.j City Water System , . Uecide - wholesale or ? . Iteview study ' . Uetermine dir�ction . Action „ Staffing Needs . Determine need Eor expansion within current space . Determirie direction Moderate Priority Zoning Code - Revision . Compl.ete review ' . Revise and update code . Decision Nuisance Enforcement (Comprehensive} . Decision an enforcement . �ravide resources . Determine direction Tax Increment Ffnancinq ��" . Uevelop pol.icy . itevise dis�ricC and plan i Loa Priority � Sanitarv Sewer Svstem ' . Locate problems . �'ix ' • Deterinine casts � Police bepartment j . Identify problems (�eople) . Formulate plan af action . Decision on actions . Implement actions ' Industrial Land in Airport Corridor (Mac Prapertv) , . Ubtain FiAC to release land . Uevelop city strategy . Actian Dept. seems to be operating well. P1an adc;.ted October, '85. � Spring '87 consider noise i ordinance; resubmit plan ' amendment to Met. Council. Decision made during Spring,' '$6 to remain retail. Need ta negoCiate contracC with St. Paul. , On-going as part of budgeC process. Three new pos- itions were included in , 19$7 budget. Qne pasitfon filled full-time; two parC- ' time. I Workshop with PC tentat- ively held 11-12-86. Gity Planner developing revi.sed ordinance per direction. Zn 3rd year of summer code enforcement officer. � Final revision adopted in May, 1986. Problems remain.� $30,000 � inc2uded in '87 budget ta sCudy problem. Revised rat�� approved for Spring '$7 � implementation. � New Sgt. & officer, in place. � � j i ' ; . � � Land approved by MAC for i �sale to Un�ited Propexties, , Anticipate June closing. . �1 � , . 0 � tb. t!. "ZO . 21. 2'l . 23, 2 �1 . w 25 . 'l b . Housing Development . Uetermine city rale ,� . Ueter�nine tyge of deveiopment . Uetermine direct�ion . Uecide on incentives Eor develapers Perkegwin Property Development . Determine type of housing . Acquire park donation , . Approve and implement Permit Eee ScheduLe . Update fee schedules . Review other cities . Uecision Lowest Priority Aircraft Noise . Initiate a proactive rale far city . Active representation for city . Determine link neighbaring cities . Public Information and Awareness � '. Develop strateg3.es for public intormation '. Disemination oE infoemation - best way . Re-examine community newsletter - Erequency, improvements, casts, priority Employee Incentive Bene�irs Program . Promote communication within arganization .� Recoynize emplayees . Uevelop program . . Study possible ideas . Determine philosophy and policy on employee bene€its � - --_._.._ , i ' i Fastponed to '87. Need to � � deaide whether is stiJ.l a priority.�or fixture years. � .r Bream PUD approved 7-1-8b. Decision made in January to adopt `85 fee schedule. On-going issue. Monitor & participate in Part 1S0 and 2nd sirport studies. Consider model noise ord- inance. Appear at April MASAC met. regarding cor- '. ridar. . Needs to be reviewed as time perm3ts. Agendas now an CATV. Need to review & decide on other City uses. ; New personnel code adopted in 1485 and revised in '86. Fending £or 19i35 Senior Hausinq . Comp].ete needs assessment . Determine lacation , •Determine facility . Uevelop funding strategy . Determine direction .._--- - i LeMav Lake Flaoding � . Devel.op interim solution - protect real �state . C►etermine best long-range solution . Act an�interim solution 0 Recreation Service + Seniors + Adults _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. '. Develop senior and adult proyr�ams . Determine direction . Expatid gresent pragrams . Uetermine need �or community facility . Action? � Firet phase ordered on 7/15/86. Feasib311ty for second phase sewer and water under study. Now part of 55 corridor study. FarC of Parks atudy, Additional recreation study needed as an outgrowtt►. r �� S 27. 28' 29. 3U. liuber Drive � . Reassess extension . Determine direction . Action? Intergovernmental Drainaae Districts . Review and approve agreement . Develop watershed plan . Determine direction Niyhway 13-55-11U Plans . Approve final design . ltesolve differences Financial/Revenue Policy ' . Develop policy and philosophy . Link services to finances . Explore alternative sources and approaches . Uetermine services - type and level m 0 Extension adopted in MSA 5-yr. plan. Construction planned for 1987. Agree:�ents adopted. WMO's in orraaizational stage. Attorneys & Engineers retained. Overall plans being developed. - —� , .. Final plans considered at Council meeting of 3/3/87. No changes made. Posptoned to the future. �