The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-12-15CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA DECEMBER 15, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Agenda Adoption. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. � Approval of the Pre-Meeting Minutes of December 1 and the Regular Minutes of December 1. Consent Calendar: a. Acknowledgement of December 1 Special Joint Meeting Minutes. b. Acknowledgement of Letter from Mn/DOT Regarding Dodd/I-494 Interchange. c. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's Report for November. d. Acknowledgement of November Fire Dept. Report. e. Approval of Wetlands Permit for Case No. 87-38, The Ponds of Mendota Heights. f. Approval of Final Plat for Kladis 1st Addition. (Resolution No. 87-118). g. Delinquent Sewer List (Resolution No. No. 87-119). h. Approval of the List of Licenses� i. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar. Introductions. Public Comments. a. Comprehensive Land Use Designation on School Forest Property. � Bid Award and Public Hearinct: a. Case No. 87-24, Centex Homes, Sketch Plan Approval, Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, HEARING, 8:00 P.M. (Resolution No. 87-120 & 87-121, and Ordinance No. 246 and 247). � Unfinished and New Business: a. CDBG Block Grant Application for 1988. 11. � 12. b. Sign Permit Application, 1960 Dodd Road (FINA Gas Station). c. Fire Dept. Purchase of Portable Radios. d. e. f. Citation Authority for Certain City Employees. (Ordinance No. 248, 249, 250 and 251). Upcoming Appointments to City Commissions. 1988 Salaries & Benefits for Non-Organized Employees. (Resolution No. 87-122 and 87-123). g. Victoria Highlands Assessment Deferments. h. Update on TH 55 Corridor Study.� i. Bream Feasibility Report. Response to Council Comments: Council Comments. Adj ourn . (Resolution No. 87-124). � , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA DECEMBER 15, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Cal l to Order .-�; 3� 2 . Roll Call . -- � �y��, _,7�` ��' 3�� -r� 3. Agenda Adoption.- �� J�� 4. Approval of the Pre-Meeting Minutes of ecember�l �� and the Regular Minutes of December 1.� 5. Consent Calendar:-� a. Acknowledgement of December 1 Special Joint Meeting -�� Minutes . �� b. Acknowledgement of Letter from Mn/DOT Regarding Dodd/I-494 Interchange. c. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's Report for November. d. Acknowledgement of November Fire Dept. Report. e. Approval of Wetlands Permit for Case No. 87-38, The Ponds of Mendota Heights. f. Approval of Final Plat for Kladis 1st Addition. (Resolution No. 87-118). g. Delinquent Sewer List (Resolution No. No. 87-119). h. Approval of the List of Licenses. i. Approval of the List of Claims. * End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. /�,. //o . -- �� 7. Public Comments. - �� • - -u.�.i. a. Comprehensive La Use Designation on School Forest Property . * - �,..�.,�� . - , - ? . �.,/ ;�,.�,- � 8. Bid Award and Public Hearinct: a. Case No. 87-24, Centex Homese Sketch Plan Approval, Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit .�� Development, Preliminary Plat, HEARING, 8:00 P.M. � 246solatio� No. 87-120 & 87-121, and O dinanc No. S 7-1 a o- Y-I; . a�' �a�� 7°.�,. i�f�,:.._��:.� ,/� "�` ,�.� ,�.-,� ��,,,� (,.�,�, aY4'�-�8.q-j?Unfinished and New Business� ' �"'�' a�� ^��-� a. CDBG Block Grant Application for 1988. �-- �'7_ ��- �al - � 7�-2 . �'a� %. � �� . � � �� -��_ �.�� ..P� "� � h' . � 11. 12. Sign Fermit Application, 1960 Dodd Road (FINA Gas Statian). � Fa.re !De t. Purchase of Portable Radios. �- j� -� ��-�"`� �" � � � Y S yl'. 3 j`r Gitation A h rity for C�ertazn City Employees. (Ordinan No: 248, 249, 250 and 251). -, � � Upcom''�`�nJ'g Appa�.n ents to ity Commissions. - '^' " 27C` .� -'��'�- _ :1^'�" ; �?�f�yr.y - 1988 Salaries & Benefzt� for Non-organized Emplayees. (Resolution No. 87-122 and 87-123). �� Victoria Highlands Asses�ment De�erments.-",�az . h. Upda e on TH 55 Corr'dar St y. *� �J� -- �-�..� .�;� ,�-.....�, - �..-�.x.,,�,.- i. Br �easi�ili�y eport.,, (Resol�on No. 87- 24} , � i�, r i I p.y�� t� G��FI�,,.,,,�_ , 7i- ( ....-v ��i Respans o ounail ammen�s: �'` � • Council Camments. Adj ourn . - � � � '� ti � �.�._ . � �- -- ,S":� oo� . ,�►� _ MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS December 15, 1987 To: � Mayor and City Council ; / From:; Kevin Fr �ity Administrator Re: ; Add-On Agenda for December 15th � � Additional information is submitted for three previouslx scheduled items:(all denoted with * on the attached revised agenda); no additions are recommended. We realize that some of the attachments are lengthy, and Council may not have time to read them all,before the meeting convenes. Staff is �repared to give a brief verbal presentation of the new information as needed. . I i 3. Actenda Adoption � • i The agenda is the same as previousl� prepared, but a blue copy denoting those items with new information is attached. 5.i. �List of Claims The list of claims is attached. ; : 7.a. ;Comprehensive Land Use Designation on School Forest �Propertv School Board member Lee Bakewell is unable to attend this evening�s meeting, and the District will request further discussion at a subsequent meeting if there continues to be a �roblem. Marvin Anderson Homes, however, has asked that the items remain on,tonight's agenda, so that they can offer a few comments about their proposal. 8.a. �Case No. 87-24, Centex Homes Staff has been working even this afternoon, to prepare revised documents as necessary. Those will be handed out and explained at the meeting. � 10.h.; Update on TH 55 Corridor Studv Please see attached memo. � . Dept 10-Admin Dept 5U-Rd&Bridge 15-Engr 60-Utilities .� 3 :�� ec ;�a� 12/15187 Claims uti�n�id �e�z. 20-Police 7Q-Parks • �az 4:44 F�M C=Ly �aT n'•er�c� �:-Y�� 30-Fire 80-Planning . t/ 40-CEO 90-Animai Cantrol ��s�� Acct Dese� C�sh D�k Cty Hanrc Ter.�p Check Nunrber 1 _ Ver.dar Ir�v�ice F�.O. A�cr�ur�t Code Rat� Carnrn Inc . 6v�..�,�7 �D E V'J1-433S-31S-3+Z+ Tot�ls Temp Check Nurnber _ , ._....._1 . _ _ -erna Check Number 4 ��er 1 F Ar�der^son Assoc � E 4,:,-4�t'iv�-84�—Q��D E�r:. F Anderson As�ac 75'�98 �� 4�+—'�� Earl F Anderson AsSoc 759�6 7 E 8:�-442�-8'��—�D� Ear-I F Anderson Ass�c 76187 � E v1-44��-83'�—+d0 Tatals Temp Cneck Number W i errio Cheak Number a �Tc�i rZ+ E Q+1-4�2�-07�-7� AT&T 0 E V71-4^c20—v7�'V5—ca Tota3s Terap Check hiurobet^ ... Ternp Check Nurnber 4 Bc,ard of Water Cc�mrrt 2E81� �c E 31-446�-839—��d b«ard of Water^ Comm c6614 � E 31-4460-839—�V� �o�rd of Wazer Cca�3rn c£815 +�'� E ,;c3-4%�c��+-844—v�¢a Tatals Ternp Check Number 4 Tem4 Check Number 5 Ci�cy Matc,r� Sup¢ly � 134�$v7 �il F +�2—�t33k'�-492+—�� 7ata1� Temo Check Nurnber 5 �eain Check Nurnber 6 Cv�y Ec} tc i p Ca i 74769 k"� c 4 T-43Q�,:i-85;�:—QfZi Cc�py Equip Co 174769 0 E ��-43�Z+�—f�75-15 Ttstals Tenip Check tUuraber 6 iemp Check Number 7 Executar� �aysterns 479�t:, � E Q�'1-433kt-43k�-1+� Tutals Ten�p C;�eck IVur��ber ' Teuip Gheck, NiunbeT� , 8 IC."ta RC � 0 G 0z-2�b72 . . - . .�� Descr i pt i � r� Teleset �tr-ee�c sigrts 87-4 5tr-eet sinrt� Street sign� 79-3 St si�ar�s 86-7 4th qtr A�c Svc 86-1'� svc cor��rss 66-9 svc c,�r�ns 1" air vent 80-1� Misc par�ts My3ar Misc sp3ys Rprs ��a 5 & i5 1�1i8 R�yroll As�cturt�c �_ - 92. Wa 92. 0S� 191. 9ti"t s83.85 1i9.4k� 118. @8 _ . - 813. �� 7� .JG k:7. 84 �J. G�D 1'3, 9�Zt4. 50 17,799.0� CJ��G. ' J 38, :»95. 85 4E. 98 46. 98 3'�. 59 4. 8::, 44. 4� 183, Q�@ 183. �+� 69. 5� � 7ec 1987 Unaaid Reoi� i2t 4:44 GM City �:�r' �!er�dr_�y� i nts ;xsrs Acet Descr Gash D�k Cty Bank 'arts� Check �urnber 8 ter�dc�r Ir�vc�ice r=i.0! Hecour�t Cude :C�A RC +d E �1-4134--litZa-32t Tatals Temp Check Nurnber - -- 8 - - ._ i et.t� Check Nurnber '� "t�:n Knuih a E 8�-4415-82B-2�a iorrt Knuth �D E sl-44f5-839-�V� r��rn Knuth � E �8-4415-844-�0 �c�m Knuth t� G 44-�1�.5 i��m Kt'�uth ' -. � - �t1 E +Z+5-4415-1rZt�-15 ., Tc,tals Temp Checit tVunyber� 9 �ern� Check Nurnber 1� _eer Bros Ine � E r2t'l-4.�3,�'.,-32��5�c� _eef Hr�s Inc @ E �DX-'�FJ�rJ�'.:10-7� _e=r' Hr��s Inc � E l.�i-433.�'i-.�i�d-6k� Totals Temp Check Number 10 t'eaip Cfieck Number 11 4ed Ce�,ters H� 37c63B � E �i-4!31-130-1+� 4ed Centers HR 37�f�8 0 E �S-41sI-3�5�-15 �ed Centers HR 372638 � E @1-4131-�20-,=:Q ded Centet^s HP 37�638 @ E 01-4131-�40-40 Oed Cer�ters NF� 37�638 c� E �1-4131-�75�-5� �ed Genter^s H� 37�?638 0 E 1�-4131-060-E� Red Cerzt�t^s t-t�+ 37�63B � E �1-4131-@7�1--7�c� de�+ Centers HP 37�7638 ¢r � �ii-2+Z�74 Totals iemp Check tVunlber 13 fe:n� Check Number 1� ' 4en�ota Nghts Rubbish 2� 1/� � E Z1-4�8k1-31�-3� +ie•r:�c�ta Hohts Rubbiah 37 W 0 E 01-4^c80-310-5@ �?eri�ota Nghts Rubbi�h 37 U 0 E �1-4�8�-310--7� �!enduta Hgi�ts ftubbi5h 37 U iD E 15-kc8�-31v�-60 ''Cotala Temp Check tVumber 1� femq Check N�unber 13 +�e'sro Waste Cc�ntrol � E f.:,-4448-�E�v�-6+Zi +lezra Waste Control 0 E 08-446�-00¢�-�O TQtals Temp Check N�_imber � 13 '• -.- . . " • . , b�scri �t ior; ._ _ i�l18 F'ayr+�il Mi leage tnr�.i 12/9 1+lileaae thru f�lE9 Mi leage tnr�.� 1^c/� Mz leaoe thr��_i 12/'3 Mi leaoe thr�.t 12I3 i7ec Svc Dec svc Dec Svc Dec prern I?ec orer�t Dec prern Dec grem Dec prern Dec or,ern Dec orem Aec Prer�i Nav Svc Nov Svc Nov svc Nrj�r�V 5VC h{�v sac chg S�c chos City Hal.l Attt� r.trrt 73. �5 143. 55 ^c7. : �d J. �8 3. 15 J. �J # 1. '37 �v. JJ 14. 52+ 14. 5�D 14. 5� 43. 5�d 9k�?. 7'D EsS�. 9� 1 � 68'3. c5 7k1Q1. 0�D 7c�='. �h5 141. 6� �u7. 99 4$8. �6 J7 .J��.'i. 3J 34. 5�l �4. 9fi1 24. 90 u�F. }� SVJ9. 25 5, 717. �� 3, 118. 5Q $, $?,S. 75 e c :c Dec i�87 Un�asQ Ree�s 3.3t 4:44 F'M City �at Nlencata h ;nts �as� Acci Descr Casn Dak Ctv Pank Ternp Ct�eck Number 14 _ Vendc�r Inv� ice F'. O. Acc�unt CGde +licwest Sirer, Service 1�Q�62 � E �D7-43:0-Q�v7-0�r Tr�tals Terno Check Number . 14 ,_ . _ . . , _ iemp Check Nurnber iS Midwest Wire Steel S�Z+3�5 � E +Z+i-44'�V�-�5�-5�+ Mi�west Wire Steel 1�357 �D E kli-4305-iD5!d-5�b Midwest Wire 8tee1 is�ti8 0 E @1-430�-07k�-7¢� M:dwest Wire Stee2 1078� rZt E 01-43c�5-�75Ql-5v� Midwest Wire Steel 1�8,?,3 Q� E @1-43Q��-c�54�-5�1 Tcttals Ternp Check Number 1.�'., iernp Check Number 16 Mi� ler Printing 17: 26 fd E ¢�2-43�kt-11�-1� Miller Rrintir�g 17�16 � E �5-43�0-1aS-15 Tatals Ternp Check Number 16 Ter,�o Check Nun�ber 37 Minn Deot of Revenue Q+ E �i-4320-05�--50 T�it�ls Temp Check Number 17 ?en3o Check Nut+�ber 18 �linriesota--C�r�way 224�t� 0 E +c�2-463�-��b-30 Minnesr_�ta-Canway �6.=:u�� 0 c 02-43�7..�,-�3�D-3@ htinrresota-Ccrr�way �74k8 � E +Zt1-4�3�+-40�-3� Tntals Temo Check 3tiiumbet- 18 Terno Chec� Number 19 ' Mirmesota Tearnsters Lac 3^crD 0 C, �1-2�7,.�., Tatals Teroo Check Nua�ber 1� :ernp Check Number c� Northern 8tate� Gower +Z� E 01-4�1�-315-3a N��rtherr� �tates Pr�wer iD E 01-421�-31�-50 Uarther�a 8tates F�awer � � i:�-4'i1�-31��-E�h Nur•thern States Power 0 E 01-421.2-31�-7@ Nur•t hern 5t at es F�+�wer 0� E 01-4? 1�-320--7k7 Descr i. pt i c�n Dec Mtcn � ��US�S T F'�st5a l:� 1/� gauge T prstslg3oves T post s Er�veloqes Envelopes N�v f�.tel tax Hc�se Ac+aoter Etrac�cez Dec dGtes Dec Svc D�c Svc Dec Svc T]ec Svc Dec Svc Arni_�unt 6�. 40 5c. 40 � 98. 00 86. �� 62. 50 116. 6St 58. 8Qt 442. 9� f 89. 72+ 18�. 7S 379. 45 3� 6B4?. fclst 3t�5. @� 345. �tZ� 4, 13�. Q� 169. ^c5 163. ��S ::.36. �'3 25�. 5L� �5�. 58 ^c -�'�'' 3. 59 1�3. 46 e v l^c �ec 1987 iat �t:44 PM :ash RceL Bescr� Cash Dak Ciy Barrk "erno Check Numoer � ^c@ lBriC{OY` I YiV C� 1 CE +tar-}herrs �tate� P�wer- � Jor• � herr� 5t at es Pnwer, �!c�r^thern �atate� Pc+wer .- . -- - ._ dc;�thern States Pawer� vcar-�Mern �ata�es P�war Vrrthern St�te� Pc�wer� i ot�ls Temp Chec}t N�_vnber 20 , femp Ghec4t Number 21 Uorthwestern Hell 7elephc�ne �;orvhwestern Bell Teleohc,ne U��rtfiwestern He12 Te2eohone Var�hwestern Bell Telephone Vr_�rthwestern Rell Telephc+ne �;orthwestern EleI2 Telephone Totals Ten�p Check Nurnber 21 Ternp Check Number 22 Jrfei Contracting Inc 5fZr1 iqtals Temp Check N!_�naber �� Tenip Check Number- 2.:, 7xyger� Service Co. 886.�, 7xyoen Ser^vice Co. 8866 Tatals Temo Check Nttmber 23 iemp Check Nuniber� �4 Pine 5end F�aving 45.c., Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 24 Temp Cheek Nursber �S =�ublic Ernpl Ret Assn 6c44 �ublic Ernpl Ret Assn 6244 ��.iblic Empl Ret Assn 6'c44 - �ublic Ernpl Ret Assn 6244 jual3c Ernpl Rex Assr� 6�44 �ublic Empl Ret Assn 6�44 ?ublic Empl Ret As�n 6244 Unoaid Reois City af Menc�ota t ,nts F°.II Accaunt Code 0 E i.�`.�-42l�-4+U+Zt-6�D 0 E Q�1-4�11--s15-.;tZr 0 E 01-4211-420-5� � E 'Z+I-4�31-�k��Z+-5'Z� � �D E �? -4'c:i 1-.;��-7f1 � E 1..�'i-4ci 1-4a�-Er� O E �.:i-�4clkJ-iQ�5-15 � E t?1-421�-0c0-;'0 � E i.�'.�-4� i Q�-fd6tit--6� 0 E ai-421�-05�b-50 D E 15-4�IQ1-0E�--6� �l E � 2 -4� 1 Q�-�Z+7aD-70 0 E �ti-4332�-Qt�DQ�-l��Zt � � (L��1FJQ�J^Ch.�J�'�a`J� 0 E �d1-430,�.��-@30-3ib � E �1-442'�-S�St=,.�,�h rb G ¢�1-2�6� � E QJ1-4134•-22ad-10 Qt E 01-4134-��-�� Ql E Q1-4134-�D�Q--2@ Q+ E 01-4i34-�3�-3� 0 E 01-4 i 34-�4�+-4�Zr � E Q11-4134-05�Zt-5rd Descripti�r� D�C SVC � Dec svc Dec svc Dec svc i}ec svc Dec svc Dec Svc Dec Svc Dec Svc Dec Svc Dec Svc I?ec Svc Stm darnage a '�.{"tY`Cl 1 �, %J S/16 thru 11/iS/87 Mc rnix 1�/4 Payroll 2�/4 Rayrall 1214 Payroli 12/4 F�ayr�all 1�l4 �'ayr�all 12/4 P�yrail 1�/4 F'ayrall flmaunt �.'�t. 0�T 342. �,�� 115. 3'3 _ _ �. .. JJ�'J. �1 4�. 88 337. 92 �c7 2$4. 59 19. S� u�i.^'�. �J '�TS. f 8 34. :,6 34. 58 34. 56 482. 33 1, :.�59, t�t�Zt 1, 35'3. 0Qr 1�. 6@ 16. 80 ;'9. 4dt �SL. a.:, 2f2.33 2� 358. ^c6 1�1.93 �, idi'9. 57 57. 73 8. 5ti �4. 83 z�i. z��. e 4 .: 1�C i��7 � .?YS�a_� �'��'8 ia:: 4:44 r'yl y..�,;v �;�� :er;ccca ,a�7 Acr_v Descr C2si, �a�c ��y ��an�c . an a C:�eck i�i�_unber� �� J�r,dot, Irivc�ice F'.O. Acc�_��_ir�t G��ce �j;ciic Ernol Rei Rssn 6�44 �cl �z �Z1-4i34-v?7i�-7�c'� �F.«iic �rnwl Rei: �ssr� b�G4 �7 E 1;�-k�3�+-u�cv"_�-6�c� =�a�•iic Erna? k�e�G Assr� E��4 . �� M�.1"�Fl.:�"I"—��J'�.Y.J = u.z_ _ �. �r�t;�l ^��c Assrr ��44 ;�t c ��,_,� s �,�._.c��_.. ,y� :"�atals Tern� Check N�_�niner^ c� � erno Ctieci< N�unner^ '�6 3Lven t;��t�r�er�s 4ce i�dwe 33!c't`�v�7 i� E 3:=,-�r.:�a-fZ�E i-6� Tc�tais Ternp .r.hec4 N�.�mber, � c6 -ern� CSeck :Vurnb�r� �? _ � Sna#_sgttr.essy Jr� �t E sZ�i-4,_'�ut-luc-1 � _ E 8ha�_ig�nessy Jr � E 0�-4'�ci7-f3�-i5 _ E �ha�_tghnessy Jr � E �c:i—�:ti��"1 �c-kt0 _ � SE�a�aai-�nessy .Tr- � E i6-4c;_�-f.:�'_-�ri3 _ t 8haug�r�essy �r^ �cz � �3-4��-i3�-!ZiL"+ - c 5haughr�essy Jr^ � E i4-422�-1�'�-�0 _ c S'rt�a_tahr�essy Jr � E 2�-4:_'�=+Zs-i3�'-6�h �o�als 7emn Check N�.u�ioer^ 27 i ar:1a Check. ttif+.trn'saer� '�8 I� Sh i e 1 V Cv 17834 �c� E Q: i-4u��-��7:;�-5i� i�-r�als `iernu Check. Nurnber- 26 � et:�o �;�ectt �Si�miaer �� t^��11 Car^ Wash � .= i 14 �f� .� '� i-4�t. ;�ct-tZt�2-::'tl ic�tals Tern� Chec:�. Iti�_�m�er '�'3 ' f�_:ao CSerk Number 3� 3r�;_rder� Dr�.tg St�,�res 23E 593 �Z� E �:_4�,�i��-�:c�c7-::� :rryder Dr�_ig S��_�r�es 136 5�3 � c k�1-43�ti,�'.,-�7!c7-7� Totals 7en�p Chec?t tU�.cnlber �� i erau Chec;t N�unber� 31 �un Newsnaner�s 7A4fa6 � c 2�i-4�4kt-t7,3+�1-8��7 Tc�ta3.s 'i'emo Check l�iur�zber 31 fer�7a Check �I�_inrber 3� fwzri City Testir�g 83@w� +Z+ E 3a-4,�3.t-i344--�L1 � Jesr_r� x oti a � �r� :'�%is �=.��r+� �.i .L ?:::l�+ �=avr��.! S=:/4 �'�yr^��i i n."'.�� "'ei..v"� ... I'rzsc 5aivs Vvv svc Nc�v svc ti7r_�v SVC N��+v svc '�tc�v svc Nvv svc �nv SVC t.l 5 key ,vs��v wa�nes �il�„ pracessir�a �l.tiSl RY'r'�CC-�553itG REV2LW YIQf'.iG`B cl^I�/ ciS�"atil��'. cy3inaer� �easino � ;; - AEii�=��dY�L '_ �'t�3. GH �9, 09 `?�.�.n �� :�, 4'3:.. �5 27. �4 17. 94 1, ��r+. 6� BE. �J 14�. �:� 214. 9k E7. c',�t 7X�.7� '17A. 7S 2� 41�. G�"1 7 :, =.''�t� 7;., b3 .33 6. 87 x �. Ls �� :�ec i'�;�7 � ur;nazd 3ecx= o•�': <t;�F''+ .-l�n f..,':�Y _ .'?MG'!7va :fl�>; �u s"'i �CC: t�. GSCY" �_.c�5i2 i.�}. c�.K `��`! i�ci'i"�K �5,^.7'v 1,�+;'iBCH �Iltftl�P_'r' .�� J�r:d�+r� Ir�v�,ica �. .�'s :�cc� �,_tr��c vc�cp ?'��tals Terno Check. N�.cri;i�er^ ��:' —w..,� r:�ec�t :tii�_t:naer� ,.,.... :3�'�a � �_rt^ms Un: ir�tited 877G9 �l � Z�1-4�'+:;ui—•'l�,_�Z�—;_'t'• Taials Ter�Tp C�eck I��_�mber- .,� s nrno Check tiurnber� 34 ur�i�ced Cer,ir-a1 TruS�cee 1697F �t G �I—��71 1er�i�ed Cer,�r�a1 Tr��_isvee �_6`�i� tZ� - �Z1-41�i—'v7��,—c� '_3r�:,ted Ce»tr-al 3rustee 16�76 +i7 L �1-41.;1—�1,=,Y�—�� !r.; wed Centr,al Trus�ee 16�7G iZ� c i,�'.,-4131—Z�6w�-5� Ur�iced Cer�trai 7r-ustee i6'?`76 Qi � �'�w-413i-4,72-7%� Tw�tals Ternn Check Nurnber 34 � �e<�� Ciec� ;V�_crni�es^ 3.�,� ilniver�sity � �f ;+'lir,nesata � G �+1—i�i� intals Terna Check Nurnber� 35 'en�o Lheck :til�_uneer- 36 J. S. P��st Of�'ice � C, �1—'1�1� Totals Ter:i�, Check !Vur�iber �6 ': emn C;��eK Nur�ioer 37 :Ji.,tinrc,a i� Weinst ir�e k'� � u�x—%+cc? —i�p�—i'�7 +�ir:L'rtr�ac� & ��ieit�s�irce �c's r_ �11—Y4S�2�—'_'_�T_:—:.�c� air�thrao R� weinsti;�e ti7 �. i�.l—%+.=•��Z:—i��-3�c1 :d>r:thr-��p � Weinstine Z� r 34-4�;=:�-84;:'—k�w :3s:-ethr��o & Weirrssine �cl ` ll-4�'�'�='—:='+c'�—'c":'� i�tais Terap Check lifunz5er� 37 � �-no Check N�_tmner 30 = �+ S 19.;7� �Z� E sc"�3.-433�1t-4'3�-21t T�stals 'rerafl Cnecit N�.irnber� 38 T'�r�7o Check N�_�rnber 33 '�?e�r�a Ar,e� WSgr Aesrr �S E �Zt2-44tZ:�d-12�—IL T,�'sals Tecap Check l�I�_ir�tber� 3� it�sera �i i�_�n '�a�o ,'��yes Dec pr^�ra 7�c .�rer�: z"l�e �r�ea� I)ec �'r�em �ec �re;n �nnl E� 0 Ir,st 1'?86 'r'�a i 1 ;aerrn i � :.."4L Y'QLc'12Y1�Y' L7c � ex oe•r�s� Z�� r_v:.si=�r, �" i_xC C�Satt�v �C.. t3ci o;-��s s�.�c rn:cri 1'W!� ktt g 0 :=t:�tr, �-tY� y l�. �l%1 _': c. �? ��. �3 48. 95 �:7„ 73 _ a. �:4 8. 4� G3. JC; 1 1 �7!. 7::� 18k7. @Q1 ' 81. �k� � �ic7. �i�T 1 Jk`J. VJIzI �tSi�. [��U �r��. 7'� �?�. t'..l Gi.J. �L�� : �.�..��. 3' _, 41.4. 81 6�. iZ•� C �r�. V�� '`4. �+Zti 4.4. 0� " e c=, _._ jor� :��s? � �:7 �c��e : �ez< :�� 4:44 �'M �_��• _. *:er:c_;a _ ..� �as ; �;cc� �esc:^ �,asn �a� !,- �{ar„1 -e:�o Checit :v�_�rober 4V+ `Jeri�W�r^ �nvr_�ice 1='.O. taccr��_ir�t Coc� 'ci :R � �i _ �l'! —.i41C•L't'-'? a ILi"_%L� To�ais "emo Chec!{ !V�_irn�er 4� . -..ta C.�ec.t 'V�_tra��r^ u' r�C:'e-_� ;�1ZY�Yf@5r�'Gd � i;,1t �:� 7 t aG i^4,�'L'::G�—s i�Gl—i'G5 T�atai� Tern�s Checit IVur�rber, 41 � at:�p Chec;; 1t�_trnber� 1F� • 3rc,tvr� c� C��i^is �r,c �i; ; 8U-44E;d�-3L='-'�� Total� Tem❑ Cn�ck N�_trnber� 4'� Tern� C�eok �i�_�enbar� 43 =c•yu�� Eq inc k"�2'.:� 7 0 E i;�-4c«fi�-K��3f4t-��;p 1"crtals Temo ChecK N�_�r�iber- 4� Te;:za Cnecit i�St�ntber- 44 L�I1C�ct�PSi�1"12 (�Ja:/:. tL�l ._ L'y--L}:;.�rL�—:�.'GS—i.Z� T�hials Tern4 Check N�.tntoer� 44 . E.:1A Ci�2crr, :\1r_tr�7CYpr' 4:� ��;:e� Do�arc G:��.trr•cy Rec�_�r^cier tia G c`:'�-'c:.'"� i�i:�ls Temo Ctiack iVumoer, �r -�r•�� C:�ee:�. i1i�_Rri�cer ��, ��r_<r:ar�d Erroa^eser� �Z! E �2�1-�r43:�t-±Z<4�-4+'c'• �e_,r�aT�d Endr�eser� � � �71-45�.t�-��-c:�R i��ais Ter,�n Cl�eck N�_�mber 46 i erno C�ec4� iV�_tmaer^ 4"� =4c'�r�al Gicer�sir�g 3 V rZ C iZ+.:i-�t-��1�-_rZ�S-i:r ic�tals Temo Ciiecit N�_;ra6er 47 Te:no Chec�. Nurnber 4f3 = i r�e Re i i ef Assr� � E ��-449+C�-� �Z+k�-k'�Z� }�'GL-1iS �2ft1�7 �.'�'7@C`f{ iU�_iEfti3E7' 1t� L�esc�� t �t � _ re 1 �:1 L :>t t c i�1i �t r.�� i YS .�.rC�Ctil '1"ii':t'it �1�—u r'1� �w �anaer� �zc il1C':Ei.it9iv� � . __ir:n feE ;�e•. U�r�i�:e t-`c'l7.YYt SCLtEtt7 YC.0 ?'E'RS 298r City c�rr�r- -:;n; ��:r� � ! '7. !�� .�..�. �1K.� �4i.94 �i=' �t i . `3 LF �+7M :+L-• C_J .3:j, �'Ci . ��-.�.W ��. G37. :u� 26. �37. �i� ��F7. Lti u�F � . �:19 :. �D_2�Z: : �'�. i� �t /: �u. L�'Z� 1�:!Z�. ��Z+ i�v�. wv� f v � L'+I?zt 15. 470 3i,�87.St73 12, �87. 5� f f [ t t _ .:ec :'387 � 'L.�n��c zecis': .�... 4:44 c�M �icy ��r iner,dc�sa Y 3is : a;� !�ec: ��escr, Ca�� Dar�. Cty ban:� 'er.:� �h�ck ?4�_irnber 4� ' +�r:cor Invr_�ice F'.O Accr�ur�t Cc�de ' _Y'�L 1 ECFi S'�L$� � E �I-'4E'�iZ�'"�.:��L!—.5� "'��tals 7emo Checif Nr.�niber� 49 , ��r7� Chec:< Nurcic�er� r� aen�ral Cufnr��u��icati�r�s Ir�c 9:�'156 V� E r1�2-43.��-45k'�-cv� 3ener-aZ Cumm�_inicati��tts Ir�c 8493� 0 E Q�1-43�0-450-cV7 i'� �tals Temp Check N�.vnt�er 50 "en*o Check Nurnber 51 zoi�t Excavatir�cr 4� E �1--44�±-v7�Q�-�� ic�tals Tentp Check Nurnber �3 i ernn Cfiecit Number �2 a�_�man Resr_��.irce Assc�c 0 E �1-44'��-110-10 Tc,tals Ter�Ta Ct�eck ht�sraoer� 5c "emo Check i�i�trnber� �U {��rne L�_imher^ 144266 � E �1-43��t-49�-�Z� :ame Lur�iber^ c�877 � E �D2-43�C�5-05�-�v� 9rr�re l.uraber 43885 � E �Z+I-4 ;3�.1--43�-,�k� `rc�tals Ter�io Checi+. N�.imoer^ 53 'etn� Checit ivuraber �4 ianns S�tiF�tA Rer��.�va3 � E �i-4��-�s7k-'7� ?�_�t�ls 7emp ChecK N�.irnber ,.�.�4 '=:no Check N�.tniber JJ i-te J4seah Cv � E ��t3-446�-�Zt�Zt-�� Tatals Temp Chec:� Ni.tmber� ,.�,5 "�:�:o Check Number �6 F�.,�rr Henr�y Fc�ster� i+tirrr� Ir�c. i0�3457 kt E ��-433;�-.�z5-.��.t Totals Temp Check Ntunber 56 'erno Checis N�unber �7 i�t';'�t'ss^a Kt^ei�sbach ' tZ+ E u�'l-449kt-�i3�-8r� Dc=_CY'1 oc ic�r� Como�.iter, ea Rors Ror �:c4� Icing s�nd Limited cc�ntac�t rprs c�qier^ �tt7Ab�Y" T^OY`5 Cr�{�7.GY` S'�ttC+3p 3"2i�lOVEt�. SYC r=�ymt �_�ne City Hall Safeiy va?ve D :t! R o�rticioati�ri �'�qe � Amo�_�nt 1, �EIZ1. 00 1 ? k"l5V7. k�� i s�+. �m 7�. StZ� , c56. 7�0 46c. 8E 46�. 86 30. �4� 30. 00 i:Ji:. J8 ��. 8tZ� 11i. 1� �9�. S� 7'3. ��:'Qi 7`�. ::=Z� J%� �g�. �� 57, '388. V3� �J. 1 G J��.t. iG .;a. �� .: :•ec 1`�8� ' ��no�.i� Kee+s� a� 4:44 r�M i:i �v :r :far�c�c�s �, i�s ;a�n Acew L�escr^ Ca�� Dnk Cty E�ar�:c 'a�,t� Chec"st Nurnoer 57 �encar Ir�vr_�ice �'.O. Accr_��tt"i$ C�ae iar:�r-a Kr^ebs'tt�en } Z� L Y,`tl—�4� L—�Zs�k—�s� Totais Terno Chec� N�.drntier^ 57 `�n:a CSec:< :�lunzae•r� �� recns Office s�'t�enine ?�u49w'� � � ��1i-43FZ��1—i2+�—,i. T��tals Ternp Check N�_imber 58 'e;:�� C;�eck Nur,iber 59 , ,rer.ier Sor-ir,a R Aii.gn i1,:,9 �1 � ��:-4.=;3t-4'3�e;—�:�t Totals 7emp Check Numoer 5� 'erna Chec:c Nttmber� E�� f � 5ia�� Ca ,?3453 +� � 4�+—ci�� #2 BiQt� Cr =845.; 0 E ,:;2-44c�d-83'�—tZ��d I R 5i gn Ca 38453 0 E� 33-44;�rb-844—�� Total� Ten7p Checit N�.irnber 6u� er:�� C�eek N�inioer E1 or��Gri Tt-ic�kai 4rd'��.�.� 7 E �i-44�I—ic��-5� :sr'�c�rc T!-ta �k.r_�l Er98;'3 tZ� E �«1—Ft4�::±—�5�'tt-5+2s _�r•�c�ri ;tit�i��2 7��5u i7 � Q.:-44�i—�Z�,=,i"ts-5'�7 ':'c�va3s `t'et�tp CheeK Iv�tn��er 6i =ra� C:-rec:� h!�unber E,� �c•.,,_��aiicar, Cauncii �'1 E �2.-4�s46—�d�-8.� �c�t�i� Tern� CnecK �i,_iu��er 6c eer,� Cneck Nurnber 63 �i5tm R�.�cie R Ass�,�c r�� L '~. --�� ,. _ —4,_::�c'�—�t, ;'�-4t+c� l"r_�tals Ten�o C;�ecic Nur�iber 6:; arn� Check N�_irnber G4 sr�therri Hydr,atclic� 72901 k� t k"��-43�Z�5-4�7i�-7�u Tc�tals `E'ernp Check Nur�iber , E4 aa7o Check N�_imber' 65 ' �r�ther�r, Landsc�fle R Desien 3�187 � E „t-446Z�-839—�� DeScri �t ic�n 4+li?eace D:UR iuner i='�r,ws .=t�3 Le c t �t�s Letters Le�cLers 5ar"e T Saic Sai=e . �aai � 8a�'= t �alt .-ir�a'! 56 :="<r:r:zr�❑ �r,❑ ; �e t3c—: 1 .: acit si ar:d Lanescaair�o 8b--� ArnC��.�ns J . r FS 41. 78 .:I�C.. J�G� .:I�[1C.� JK� 21'c":. i� 11:�. �� llc. f5 33G. 46 47�. 3;' G$: . 6� __1+9'3`S!Zi , . L,:��. 7�7� 7, '��t �u. ;c � 7. ��:2t. :�s�� 44. 78 44. 7L-' 4, $9.�'.,. �� t ��C ' 'jS% , � :Yir'ce:. 7 �iPG 2 � :_� � 4:.:}!} C�M �.... �� _. roM�C _�L d �'1'G S ; �5� Hecz Descr ::as�r �a�c �t.� �ar��c "�;:�a �:iec!t N�.unber� �:� !e'r:cior- Fr�vc*ice t='. Ct Acccturec C�,tie ic�tals Ternp Check N�_irnoer� �`� -�ar� Giecdt �2iun�er, �6 -- Plurnbirig Place c8�:'8 0 R �1-��.�.+4 T�.�tals 3em❑ Cfieci+. IV�_ir+ibe�^ 6c s erofl Checlt N�_�mber c�? =rc,�x Ph�t� 6k"137� ti� E �1-43Q��-��k-3�c'� Toials iernp Check �3,_trt�ber� 6'7 Ternn C:-ieck N�_uaber 68 =� E R A 6^c44 � G �1-c:z174 � F� = R A 6:'44 �D E 01-41�1-11V1-1�Z� Tatals Temo Check N�imoet, 66 ' 7et:�a Check hir_�r�zber� Es� �ez iabie 46882��1 k7 E 0:,-4.:w�L�-1-�Zi--2�� 7c�t�1� Temp Check N�_iri7ber, 69 Te��o Cfiec�t Ni�mi�er 7� teisinaer� Exc Ir�c +� � '2�=-4„��t"�-ti.�k-��@ Tutals Ternp Cl�ec�c N�_trnber 7�Zi � �:f1� Check iuumber 7'! Si�r�al Sys•terns 11453 k� E �7z-4:..;k�-49�Z�--Sk� Si�rial Sy�terns f 14,.�.ri �e1 E �1-4.�3�-45�-7� Si�r��l Sy�ter�i� ? 1�+5i � E 1.�'.,-4,:3�h-49�-5� T�rt�ls Terno Check N�_truber- 71 i a:7p Check. N�.iraber 7� S= I Fr^inLinc� K Granhic� 17835 i� E '�1-430:�-'�7�i7-3k7 Tc�ta25 Temp Check N�_vnber 7.:: 3 L�iiO Check Ne.tmi�er- 73 T..in City Saw & Svc ? 6E��1 � E �l-4J�G1J—�J�C�^J�L� irescs�i �s i�_�r� �fe fee cancei2�c r'�"li_it� OT'r�C�551YiCl l]ec ar�ern , Dec ='r^ern L�a I�nce 11 / 16 ar^Cer -a'�`trn damaae i�irae ciac:� tnticr� t 1Q72 CzC�CKi'el'�CS'7 Time cloc4 rnt�n h�rin�cina svc ��1c:lYi SclW/qt'lYiCi@Y' Rr,t+%i�ns 4. �335. �� ..� 1 . J�L� 31. ��+ 4�. 0� t�. ;. st�o7 �::7. �Z+� 18. arC 45. �0 S. 4�Z� 5. 4t� ,3� 'cF��. 2Z� , c:�,5. l�Qt f E. �!� 16. 5� .� b. J'� 4`�. S� 41. 4� 4f.4st . i � � . �i7� w � j ' � �ec 1'�87 lir�naid :�e_is- ta� 4:44 1='M� Ci �v r�? :�:enoc�ta � ncs :asti Acct Descr Ca�n DaM rty Bar,k ; �a�� CFieck Numoer T3 lerrd�r Irsvoice F'. fl. Acco�inz Cocie I':vs.r� City Saw & Svc 166�1 � E G"1i-<t��5-�7t2+-7� iwar� City 5�w R Svc 166�h1 � E 15-43�5-k�6�-6Z� - -- ---- - - ._-_____.- -----. .------•--- -• "c�tals Temp ChecK :V�_inroer- 73 .._..- - - ___... __-- .•-- fem� Check Nurnber 74 � � - aa�a. ..... �.��•w,a3t�.a� � T t� T, iz� E �1-4::1�-�v�-3vJ Tatals Ternp Check N�.cmbe�^ �4 I'er�n Ghec4 Nurnber^ 75 3v^�rff Ir�c � �754 k"� E c�-43��d-��d0-��l Totais Terno Check Number 75 T�ia2s Cash Acct Descr Casn D�k Cty Har�it ldANUAL CHECKS: 3t'and Tota1 11549 .1,053.00 Paui Kaiser . 11554 4J.25 Qave Sorb,}� . 11551 150.00 Soo Line F R . 11552 25.00 St. Pau] 4:ate r 11553 484.42 City M H Fetty cash 11554 .175.OQ t4inn Benefit Assn . 11555 200.00 Bernard Kzran . 11556 5,540.32 QERA 11557 5,460.34 Co�nissior.er of Revenue . 11558 9,,ll5.92 Dakata �aunty Bank . 11559 625.00 " 11560 3,484.52 SCCU i1561 28,682.9Ci City F'.'i. Paryoll Acct .11562 3,121.7$ DC ST Ban�. 11563 21,425.71 City M.H. Payrall Acct 79,591.16 G.T. 313,300.33 � � ii Descrioci�n - - - ',. Amount . ='< . Ghairr sawlarincter^ . .;�1.'3k! Chairi saw/grir�oeT^ „�1.90 �-_ _--_ __--_ _.------------ -- ��`�. 74't. 'T�1iw,--:+niulw.x �h.... .. }'Iht1A.r�.�ST.iY.r .� • . L D Calls Strn darnace Nav Svc Glothing Allowance Easement Fleter City Ha31 site Reptenish petty cash Sept premium D. Ward reimburse expense 11/2Q Payroll 11/20 & 12/4 Payro1l 12J4 FIT, FICA, tAEDICARE 72f4 Payroll deductions �� 5214 Net Payroll FIT Fire payroil Net Fire payro7l 4. �4 4. 04 78s�. �Qi 78�. �rb c..,3, 7'�t1'�. 17 G.d�y 7�9. 1% MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � November 15, 1987 To: • Mayor and City Council , From: Kevin F��ty Administrator Re: i Progress on Highway 55 Study I � City Planners Howard Dahlgren, Tim Malloy, and I met with representatives of Resurrection Cemetery yesterday to bring them up to date on the Highway 55 Corridor stud�, and to inquire as to their possible interest in releasing some of their;land north, east, and south of the Furlong Addition for a redevelopment project. They were very interested in our study; and in the �ossibilities redevelopment would provide for their corporation. They are currently completing a long- range'development plan for the cemetery, and indicated that by May 1st, they would be able to tell us how much land, if any, they would be interested in releasing. The purpose of this.memo is to provide a brief (because it is on the add-on agenda) synopsis of staff thinking,on how we should proceed with the Highway 55 effort. We will be prepared to discuss our thoughts further at the meeting. Staff;suggests that we begin with the following actions: l. Furlona area redevelopment - The key is attracting a major development so as to create a viable tax increment district. Marketing the pro�er�x should wait until we know how much land Resurrection is willing to offer. Therefore, we should plan to prepare and distribute a Request for Proposals next summer. 2. o ers Road redevelopment - Redevelopment of this area should ideally be a�art of the larger Furlong Area redevelopment, but financially can stand on its own as a part of the City's existing tax increment district. Staff suggests that we attempt to integrate this area into the RFP next summer, but make a commitment to the neighborhood that even if that effort does not succeed, we will begin to purchase their homes by a specified date, perhaps sometime in 1989. i 3. Mulvihill redevelopment - Redevelopment of this area is almost entirely separate from the above parcels, and is included in the City's existing tax increment district. United Properties has previously indicated its desire to 4. 5. , I r ultimately acquire the area, as an addition to the MAC property. Therefore, staff proposes that we begin to work with United and the neighborhood. This would include coming up with a plan for guaranteed purchase of properties by a specified date. ; Utilities - Extension of sanitary sewer and water lines from Enterprise Drive in the Business Park to the � Brooks/George's Golf Tee pro�erty, and on across Highway 55 to the Furlong Addition, is included in the City's existing tax increment district. Council may recall� that we previously designed and let for bid the � extension to Brooks. However, the project was dropped when Brook's developer went away. � � i We know that the trunk lines will ultimately be needed, regardless of whether the Furlong area is redeveloped, or remains as a single family neighborhood. Therefore, staff suggests that we proceed to complete that portion of the project next year. It will be necessary to come to some agreement about what the level of assessment� will be to the Furlong residents if the neighborhood' remains. ' Hiahwav Improvements - As discussed at our public ; information session, the big "unknown" holding up our plans is when the Mendota Interchange improvements wi,ll be constructed by MnDot. Simultaneously to all of the above, we should be strategizing with MnDot officials and our legislative delegation to insure that the � �roject gets a priority position in MnDot's capital � improvement plans, and adequate funding is provided. ACTION RE4UIRED To react to the above staff proposal, and give any direction Council desires. • � It would probably also be a good idea to invite the area ; residents and landowners back for another information ses�ion to discuss our plans with them. j e CITY OF MENDCITA HEIGiiT5 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNE50TA ORDINANCE NO. 246 Ari ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NC1, 901 � The City Counail of the City of Mendota Hei.qh�s, Minnesota ordain� as follows: �Sectiion 1. Qrdinance No. 401, known and referred to as the ��Mendo�a Heights Zaning ordinance," is hereby amended in the following respects: ; � A. The following described paroper�y, aommanly referred to ; ag 1{ensington Planned Uni.t Davelopment, �hase I, � situa�ed in the City af Mendota Iieights in Dakota i Caunty� Mi,nnesota, is hereby rezoned from an "R-1," Ane �' Fami.ly Residential District, as the c�se may be, to an "HR-PUD" hi.gh-den�ity residen�ial Planned Unit � Develapment, to-wit: ` f . . ;'11�at par� ot' the Sauthwest Quarter af Sectian 36, Tocanship 28, Range 23, Dakata County, Minnesota, described as follaws: Commencing � at the southeast corner af said SouChwest Quar�.er; thence Narth : Q°-26'-53" West, assurned bearing, along the east line af said Southwest � Quarter, a•distance oF 386.12 �eet Go a northerly rxght-of-way liae of Minnesota Department af Transportation Right-of-Way Plat . � No. 19-56; �hence Narth $9°-52'-47" West, alang said nartherly � zight-of-way line, a distance af 568.83 Eeet ta the actual point '' nF beginning; thence Narth $9°-52'-47" West, cantinuing along said northerly Ri�ht-of-Way line, a distance�oE 284.04 €eet; thence North 86°-03 -56" West, a distance of 469.40 feet ta the northwest � corner of said Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-Of-Way � Plat Na. i9-56; thence North 86°-03'-56" West, along a northerly ! right-o�-way line o�' Minnesota Department o� Transportation Right-Of-Way Plat No, 19-55, a distance of 241.14 feet; thence North 0°-00'-00" East, a distance of 337.9Q feet; thence North 89°-23'-32" East, a distance qf 200.00 £eet; thence North 12°-21'-32" East, a disGance of 321.70 �eet; ther�ce North 30°-56'-20" East, a distance o� 206.63 feet to a southeriy right-af-way l.ine of Mir�nesota Department o� Transportation Right-oE-Way Plat No. 19-56; thence easter�.y, along said right-of-way line, along a nan-tan�ential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central. angle of 22°-00'-1$' and a radius of 676.62 feet for a distance af 259.86 feet, the chard o� said � curve bears North 72°-33'-05" EasG, to a southeast corner of said Minnesota Department o� Transportation Right-Of-Way Plat No, 19-56; thence northeasterlY, continuing alang said curve, having a cen�ral angle of 11°-27'-59' and a radius of 676.62 �'eet for a distance of 1.35.41 feet; thence North 50°-04'-57" EasG, a distance of 262,$1 feet; thence Narth 69°-31'-24" East, a distance of 49Q.27 feet; thence South 7°-34'-29" West, a distance af 197.93 feet; thence Sauth 18°-51'-12" East, a distance o� 21Q.00 feet; thence South �.4°-11'-11" West, a disCance oE 485.00 �'eet; thence Sauth $3°-57'-05n West, a distance of 32S.OQ Eeet; thence South 0°-07'-13" West, a distance of 475.4Q feet to the paint of beginr►ing. EXCEPT that part of the above described tract lying within the Plorth One-half oE said SoutEiwes� Quarter. t✓ . � Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 247 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Council of the City of Mendota iieights, Minnesota ordains as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 401, known and referred to as the �'Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended in the following respeats: A. The following described property, commonly referred to as Kensington Planned Unit Development, Phase I, situated in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned from "R-1 " One Family Residential District, as the an , case may be, to an "MR-PUD" medium-density residential Planned'Unit Development, to-wit: __..._.__ __.. . •, . � ..,._. . •• - ---�- - --�— 'I�at part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Cormiencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence North 0°-26'-53" West, assuned bearing, along the east line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 386.12 feet to a northerly right-of-way line of Minhesota Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Plat Nv. 19-56; thence North 89°-52'-47" West, along said northerly right-of-way line, a distance of 568.83 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 89°-52'-47" West, continuing along said northerly Ri�ht-of-Way line, a distance of 284.00 feet; thence North 86°-03 -56" West, a distance of 469.40 feet to the northwest corner of said Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-Of-Way Plat No. 19-56; thence North 86°-03'-56" West, along a northerly right-of-way line of Minnesota Department oE Transportation Right-Of-Way Plat No. 19-SS, a distance of 241.14 feet; thence North 0°-00'-00" East, a distance of 337.90 feet; thence North 89°-23'-32" East, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 12°-21'-32" East, a distance of 321.70 feet; thence North 30°-56'-2U" East, a distance of 206.63 feet to a southerly right-of-way line oE Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Plat No. 19-56; thence easterly, along said right-of-way line, along a non-tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle oE 22°-00'-18' and a radius of 676.62 feet for a distance of 259.86 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 72°-33'-05" East, to a southeast corner of said Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-Of-Way Plat No. 19-56; thence northeasterlY, continuing along said curve, having a central angle of 11°-27'-59' and a radius of 676.62 feet for a distance oE 135.41 feet; thence North SO°-04'-57" East, a distance of 262.81 feet; thence North 69°-31'-24" East, a distance oE 490.27 �eet; thence South 7°-34'-29" West, a distance of 197.y3 feet; thence South 18°-51'-12" East, a distance of 210.00 feet; thence South 14°-11'-11" West, a distance of 485.00 feet; thence South 83°-57'-05" West, a distance of 325.00 feet; thence South 0°-07'-13" West, a distance of 475.00 feet to the poin� of beginning. �X�f:PT that part of the above descr.ibed tract lying caithin the S��il•ti One-half of said Southwest Quarter. � Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in•this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor a) The project can be planned and develaped to harmonize with any existing and proposed � develapment in the areas surrounding the projec� site. d) The project has density in accordance with the City's comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o� Mandata Heights, that Case 8?-2�, Centex Homes Inc. proposal far the Kensington planned unit development is hereby given sketch plan concept approval as shawn �n ' drawings dated �� ./5- � I�y� � and subj ect ta the execution of a develapers agreement af form and substance acceptable to the City. r Adopted by the City Council o� the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day af December, i987. ATTEST: m Kathleen M. Swansan City Glerk CITY COUNCTL f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS , By ' , t Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayar i � ; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 87-120 RESOLUTION GIVING SKETCH PLAN APPROVAL TO CASE NO. 87-24 KENSINGTON MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Whereas, Centex Homes, Inc. has proposed a planned unit development multifamily housing project of 500 units in the southeast area of the City of Mendota Heights; and Whereas, the Planning Commission has reviewed said proposal, and recommended its adoption by the City Council; and : Whereas, the City Council makes the following findings with regard to the proposal: 1. The proposal is consistent with the goals, intent, and purposes of Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the community: a) To provide a diversity of housing types within the multifamily residential areas of the Southeast Area. b) To encourage development which will be sensitive to the natural beauty and terrain of the Southeast Area. c) To encourage development at an appropriate scale for the area. d) To encourage development which provides the opportunity for property ownership by its residents, this being recognized as beneficial to the community as a whole. 2. The proposal is consistent with the goals, intent, purposes, and planned unit development provisions of the City's zoning ordinance: a) The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the community. b) The proposal is an effective and unified treatment of the development possibilities the project site and the development plan provisions for the preservation of unique amenities. [:3 i1 natural 6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKC7TA CQUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-121 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PL�INED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CASE 87-24, KENSINGTON MULTIFAMILY PROJECT, PHASE I Whereas, Centex Homes, Inc. has propased a multifamily residential planned unit develapment project in southeast Mendota Heights; and �lv � Whereas, by Resolution No. 87-�1�-�the Ci�y Council has given overall sketch plan concept approval to that plan; and Whereas, Phase I of the proposal is consistent with the approved sketch plan; and Whereas, Phase I is also consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance af the City of Mendota xeights. � NOW THEREFt�RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Height�, that a canditional use permit for a planned unit development be granted to Centex Homes to allow the develapment of 136 manor homes as shown on drawings dated December , 1987, subject to the executian o� a developers agreement of form and substance acceptable to the City. Adapted by the City Counci.l of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of December, 1987', CITY COUNCTL Cl2'Y OF MENDOTA HEIGFi`I'S By Charles E. Mertenso�ta ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Fr M E T R 0 P 0 L I T A N C 0 U N C I L 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Pau2, M3.nnesota 55101 DATE: December 10, 1987 � T0: Metropolitan and Community Develapment Committee F'ROM: Lang Range Planning Program {Barbara Senness} SUBJECT: City af Mendota Fieights' Comprehensive Pian Amendment Southeast Area Plan Metropoli.tan Couneil Referral Fi1e No. i166b-9 Metrapolitan Gouneil D3.strict 15 BACKGROUt1D Mendota Heights first submitted this amendment to the Cauneil in Aecember� 1}85. The eity withdrsw the amendment after the Counezl indieated that it would approve the amendment onc� the Council received a modifica�ion to ensure satisfaetary complianee with ihe Couneil's G'uideliries f�r Land Use Conpatibili�j� W��h Aircra�t Noise. AUTIiORIfiY i'� REPIEW The MeiraDo�i.�an Land ?'�ar.*�:.ng Aci of 1976 requires �ha� a��.ndsenis to 3ocal conprehensive p].ans be p^epared� sub�.it�ed to �he Metropo�' ;.,� Couneil for re�iew �.nu adop�ed in the s�e �.nner as the e^_��3 p'=ns i?V`��. Stat. �73 •�6�, subd. 2, 1978 ). Gti:.idelines 2dopted pu^su:_rat �ca M.�nn. S'-�t. �i73. $6�} i02' :'$Y7.@K� j�Z'ODQSSt� 2II?II "{.'�@IIt.S �?'OY? C�� 2��r...:� :•avjpw D@_^iQG{' iOZ' 2.�DIlCtT�IE'.It.S poientia.a.lq 8i='eC�`.�.II� O�@ OI" ID02""� Oi �2 11M�^OpC�=i.2.i'. S�Si.°iL'.,'�. ''c21� 2�7Q—C12�' review period for amendments that do not have a po4enw�?1 �ae� o� m� �ropoi �'-�zn spste�. Mendo 4a Heig�x�s t SLIbiII� lii 4L� �.LS i2"t�Oa�C amenc�ent oa Novern�er 2�;, 1987. On December 10, 1987, the Ch2._r d��e �� hat the �endment presented no po�ential impaeL on me4rapo�Y �^. sps�e�s; ;�erefore, the 60-daq review period applies. The 60-dap dea��...�e �o^ ^�v�ew oi Lhe amendmen� .is Janua:y 27j 19$$. :DjSC'.?L°T?'Q2d 0�' PL�..�t AHLI�'DN�'NT 'T'ne 2..m�ndment proposes to change the land uses on C~.�L�"Oi�r.u�G LG, Y 5Q0 aeres of �.Jndevalope� la.nd � �he southeast are2 of Mandc� �e�h�s (r��er ta A�taehmen4 '1). The changes were initiated in response ta the co�ie�ion o� �-�9�4 znd the c�on4inuing iIIpaets of a�^era#'v noise. ��Nt9L.�'S?'S �'he follat�-ing analqsis addresses aireraft noise �d �nd usp �amva`ib� 1itp, t:r�nspo^�a�ion and housing. ��TMer�#`t 14a� se and Land �ise CdIILic.ry-.tlb'! 3.7.'�Y x3p adap��.*�g ihe Council's model noise ordin��ee, �4e:��u;a �e;.�.Ys h� �.deauatel� a,ddressed the concerns expressed by the Cauncil in i�s -��_�'�' rec�sw of t�s amendmen�. Mendota Heights is the first ea�uun?vy :�*? the resior_ ta adepL �he , ordinance, and in so doing has helped identify implementation problems. For example, the city, builders and developers have pointed out the difficulty of findin� windows that meet the specifications of the noise ordinanee. The Council is working and will continue to work with Mendota Heights and others to correct such problems (see Attachment 2). The change in location of the athletic complex noted in the amendment is within Aireraft Noise Exposure Zone IV and therefore, does not pose a problem in land use compatibility. � Couneil staff is pleased with the responsiveness shown by Mendota Heights in addressing noise/compatibility concerns and hopes that an ongoing cooperative relationship can be maintained. Transportation The amendment proposes both residential and limited business uses for the southeast portion of Mendota Heights. The metropolitan highway facilities serving the area, I-494 and the interehange of I-494 and Dodd Rd., can , aecommodate the traffie generated by the proposed residential uses. However, traffic generated by the nearby Northwest Airlines headquarters site in Ea�an does pose a potential peak hour capacity problem at the Dodd Rd. interchange. This may affect the city because the Minnesota Departnen� or Transportation (Mn/DOT) has informed Mendota Heights and Eagan that correcting any capacity deficienc�es at this interch2nge will be a loc� respon��b'_?itp. Housi.ng The amendment proposes residential areas of low, nedium and high de�ity a� two, four and eight uni�5 peT` acre, respec�ively.• The med�� and h.�� eeasi�y zreas are in�ended fo^ z variaty of housing �ypes, wzich W��? increase � opportunities for a greater choice of housin� in Meado�a Heights. i:oweJe^, the �y want to cons�der even hi�her densities or up to 20 w*+�ts ps:^ acre �. promotir� affordable honsi.ng. , F'T�1DIh'GS OF F9CT �ND CONCLIISIONS 1. Mendota Heights h2s adopted a no�se ordin2nee that suf_"iciently addresses �he con�itions ror single-�am.ily residential development in A=.rcr�� Noise r�xposure Zone IV. � 2. Mendo�a neights is �he �irst co�unitp �o adopt a comprehensive a� craf"t noise ordinance as proposed in the Council's adopted Aviat�on Cha�ter. The city is working with the Council to correet problems associated with • implemen�z�ion of the ordinanee. 3. Additional non-residential. development near the Dodd Rd. interch2�e w'_t� I-49�+ m2y cause tr��fic problems in t,he peak hour which Mn/DOT has • indicated must be ad�rsssed loc2Zly. For this reason, Mendota Heights should monitor the development of t.ne area west of Dodd Rd. wr.ich is planned for l�ited business. �4. The city may want to consider ailowin3 densities of up to 20 units �er acre to allow even greater flexibility of housing types and the potent�l �or ` nore affordable housing. � f .� ' � �• � RECUi�'IENAATIONS That the Metrapolitan Council: 1. Adopt the Findings of F'aet and Cone�usions as part af this recommenda�ion. 2. Inform the city of Mendata Heights that the Southeast Area P3.an is in confc�rmity with metropolitan system plans and consistent wi�h the other ehapters of the Me�ropo3.itan I�evelopment Guide. � 3. Commend the eity of Menflata Heights for adopting the ordinanae for aireraft noise attenuation and for its efforta to �uceessfully implement the ordinance, 4. Direct staff to continue working with Mendota Heights �o ensure successful. imglementat�an af land use eompatibility abjee�ives, BGS203, PHLPA1 � , � .� - r� �,_.�_�:,•� � �_ �� • � �:� �:, ��._,.: ,r _ __.--_•- �c u. � : - --,�_. :�• f � �� . :'=!7 ce`._NIQIwwI I' . .:..:�� __= �_ �:..�- _ _ , � _� ,�,;��:_ -:,�_�.::.ti l _:. � . ,. . � ��I�lll�l=��,,�� i. �. � -- _ �� , . _..� t "�� ! ; • , -- n� ^� ( �`.u�1 =;��:..'•`._ :h:_,�+y..�>�:.�ii�_��i�'�-r--'�.1"y'- —T � ! � '- . ' I i ; ,,� ' �; %' �`�� I � ►.J i ,'. �•I I-• � _ -tJ�� _ .,.-�. ' . �:r " wEND�KO7a GOtF COURSE O CWiNINr [1�� i \ �_ � I % � � � ) • t •�_ _ _ : �1 w �^` (Mrv�iC! I� � -- � - ,�--- `~,- Menclot�� I-1��11�t� � - .'=- - - � : , -� . -- -� ----- - --- . -- -- - . - � � .. � . /�� _ - i----- ------ '� ; � _ - �\ � Sc�utlla� ,l Ar�� _ �' - � --- - � ' �al��u �r. � � _ a ... . � y •.,�r4 _ y ... I /� + �� _ —�:�L:.� �� I� ��f�'J1 � 1 __.. _.._ " '` � � !.,..5' � �Jy' � �\�I I: I I �1 �� 1..��' 1: � �' �• \ ( ai • � . � � � .�� _ � _ I _� � .�. .��. � � � f11� iro C � ,-. -_�=- �� :� �; �. So�il.l�e�sk �1re� '�'. - � _� � ,�` �-_:, �' ,� � `� ,• - I_ancl lase Pian„�.,,�, i;��;. _ � =__�_�� : � ! � . . - � -Li. = ' •� � �. { I � . � uu •�� . , , T _ ;�- < .' : : 1a � ,� . . -� , „ :� . �... .. ... ... �_� :::.:.� .� � I-��LYr_. �4 ��...h�Y�l�—.I \ 1 �ua�..._�_ � �.�•-�-�� _.s •1� i.y- �S ct''__ .f:: - - � i � 7 �� -- . 'i`�� ` - --�----�-1h ` � � ` �� ._ , ? _ � _`�_; ��r ..(\�. . �.�u� , • , , . - : ' i • - - '.' - u• �� + ►'nN � � �VII ` � i 1 ` ` � � `. ' �. �.: �� , ,� ! �� - .�� . � �� ;; . <<-- -,; ; -� �::1�� -�- : _ z �. Y —�-��: , � _� . � � � ; �,� < < —z �- = • � - - =..o --.� �- _ _ . :, �.__ , \ � ,��a,: , . �� —�� r = •,:• �, : �- �� , w�� 1 �� ,� ;�• .. . � . �¢' r� I��_�, _ - _ :i��<< :.��: r_rr•� � , ,�,. � , �,�: _� `,t; --' �I T '� ; a - U': q � (: ., � � : . �(- � �r �- ` �' i .L� 1 C� M:. . � -• ;�• • ^ .o��.� _ _ _ . _ • • � . � �. < < . ; .�� r � '1 �•. � ` 11—•"`Ctl � � .,,. 1 � � i►� I - "-Ls - — - - �-- � �. 1^`j ��r�, ;`. • �f +,,,F � _ 4 �'��X��:��,,.,-. 1 �~,�� \`'� �,\��1 �•i: �� - _ _ :5. � � r .-� � � `� „ � _ _ _ _ _ ` � - - J I =._� f �� .}� ' ' 1� F � t _ � �. '•. _,,i. �-• �� •. r; - �s ' - - - � i �• `• :l: • K � "� � (' ,�" 1• r�=�� t � "' ^': � •' � ' '2 ' �� ._ - _ - � r� ._: .• _ _ - ' • � / - � '� ` � • '�' 1! •`� '� �{•�'�� M�� ` I�1 i ^�1,,,�, `�.� ; �,i�y� Y '- �l_ � � O� `-� _- T�' � _ _- � •� � �� `• V �• .� � •�• �`i �� % - �_1�M .-__ r- � 1��,, ;�l}s�.�" sr : / I � _ �• �•�� . / � i {' ,. � �� \� r' -- -� . _s ..- _ _�. ; ' . �` .�' .� • • r, , �-=�- ��'� C _, , ^ �' �� ts,z,,- 1 � ��: � '� ,___ _ _ _ _=r.' - — _ : / ' �� r II � F� � ic s .- _ G,tr. _ _ —C - - _- __ __ ' / 't - • I `. [��f'`C�• • �•' t�• 1 � ��-f♦( ��1`��-��^�I �-1 �f\L `� �. " �a �� :�r. j < _ _ -� � _ —_ _ ' — / �• I C ••� ��• • %/ �� , M �.��aOl % y ( �1 � ^ �� - r I � �ul _ - ' • • • � ri � ! i ��f ��1/� ( �. .T�l • � � �/ � ��" a'�E� i� \..-��` = ' � �:.Tp. � � ' • � _ ' " •'� � •�ft�� +- ) . 1 {.1j77 � �,s'1�;�� ' � le � —'_ - _ '_ _: ' _ � '� �1 � _ � 1 a i'` l. � i i 1 i -J` G ! ��, 1 �_•� � "_��'�l ``�` • .'. • r,/ /'"-a, � 1 _ ,� - - � -= -� �,. r � .... , � _-�-- . � �y� /�-- r— - _ ` � ' � rC' - ---� i�r r� - —� �1 '�� -M, �:'� ,•=-- � � _ -• �� .�^�;�+' . 1 1`� ^�ijl� j�>� r� r •! •� �� r��.1�� ',i' ..�``•ti ii'�� `� ��(�` .r/�� I-�-j.-� •'•1. � ' c.'�� l � .c.�i d � �r' 4l �ls �� ,�r�l �� 1 i� � 1 ' ` �'� �,\x � � �� r ri ..... K... � � ��,.i (- _ ^tr 'i" t ► � � ��„'S �. : � i ;'� /" � - - � , � /,�...K�.•�� , _ . � �� r, •._ ��1/ . � 'S�' C I, � '�'�, .r_f � �-u°' � ''�`• f� � � :. .u- , � t � , , •_ ,� <> ;-. . � � � , .--.u� �. ., � �:'�•: .� , _ > � �.3, . �.�.o,. —fi� (� _ �" �= -- . � . ::'•.: 7 � � � � , i: w �� • , � � !', �� `ii ' ° ` .h - -- -- - — — � ( :.' -� � � ,` � �- � � �' � � � t . i y1� •,"� •' f. � `�'X.:iIU(�� . � .._ _ ._ J' �'�y'l��` _` - � -q yr I -' - �!�� .� ` � ; ��'2 /�� ' � �` .�� ` �i' \ ` ��) �ll II �, � : Q��'',!or(� �� .� �, V ; � ��` ..��i:�� ; _��. �` � � '1 r �)��j:. I� � � N) (/� % � , ` � � ��\�.` j � �� = ;i,�. / I ' ; `� I ��.f` �� `J �,� �1 �y / . �� .. "Y% �;+�)/1��i� ` - ; X�y1 'Fi'��"�.� 1, , , ��D � •�,� T/ � � - � � �� 1 i � - _ — ' ` - �' � /) � 1`��' � � ��/r �• �+..i__ �� I �! � ^ If �- .�` (1��(� 1 ( CI�A � ( fi��(i v ^'�'� i�111��J1��I(}�U �..� � ' � I �� `� � f �j V I / '�. �fsl 1 � .s � _"1 i+` 1 t � � ii ,, ;I.: „ . ; , , , �'�. , _ ; � ;,�- �,, ,� � �� 1 ��a� ' _ � V, ``. �' � � r � •� 1` � Iyi �� i� � i� � �� 11 �z� � r 1 r �f��R � � � -_.--�� / 1 ,�/ �.-,, � �i• � �� (� �•.`_ �.• � . ; -r_,z, � ��.._ s� P_� � �� ti r � - ,_ �._I � ' -.., ::•�� _ . � , , , �, � J � � r }., ,( , , ; '''-�, � ,,� c..�.. ; � _ .:� , I '� 4 � � � ; � � �, �' � ` �� i� � � l -` _p , � � .� . . I�� ,� � � , • �7. � ��``�_jF•1� , I �� l ac t j ,,� �) � ^ _J I11�C-t'�t'.` \,�♦ (!i`.�/i..� ; `_y�'" '.�.. �3 ` ,� �� ;. - ' — -- -- - -- ' \-_�. ` pr ` � !- `, ��'` ;r�i� �_ `�"'�. • -F.-.�r� __ �_. - _ ._._ _. ....1 H'T'E ft � 7 Il'T•!!=11r1'p�11:1F 14'�`1�1 __ _.•_.�=•-lL�•=�-�-1_�_ `' �� - •� -- - -- ��cs--- •' � � � � ` �: L �� - -•- - �awa � lllf"T3f�_1L1=� -�-':+-*-;rr n ,,� � � �,t•. ` --q--- - , _ - -�_.-_ --- /'-- .'''r� ' 1 , '�%':�• •.� ,''' ��?;i �' �=_S l��',•.•�"� ��-=; �, ' 1 • ' '.% � ' • . �, . .. . `,��'.. _��rL� . � . . • . . „ ... .. .. �/'�' . � :\• . .•I:i �r'�ie\�•�' � .. / r. , o .P�� . ..• � I�"'�, t � � CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Pre-Meeting Held Tuesday, December 1, 1987 Mayor Mertensotto opened the scheduled pre-meeting o� the City Caunczl at 7.15 o'clock P.M, The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Cauncilmembers Bl.esener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. Council discus�ed 1988 compensatian reque�t o� City Administrator Kevin Frazell. Council consensus was that Frazell"s 1988 salary would be $48,000, approximately a 6 percent increase over 1987, and would be included on the resolution setting aIl saJ.aries far non-union employees on the December 15 agenda. Justification for the increase i� salaries being paid City Administrators in camparably sized metropolitan area communities, and the result� of the pay equity study campleted earlier in the year. Council also indicated its approval for Frazell to attend the National League of Cities Legislative Con�'erence in Washington, D.C. in March, 1988. Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M. to the regular].y scheduled Council meeting. CITY OF MENDOTA HESGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNE54TA Minutes o� the Special Jaint Meeting af the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission Tuesday, December 1, 1987 The special joint meeting of the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission, City of Mendota Heights, was he2d at 7:15 o'cloc� A.M. at City Hall, 75Q South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. The meeting was called to order at 7:25 o'clock A.M. The fallow�ng members were present: Mayor Merten�otto, Councilmembers, Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. Parks and Recreation Commission members: Stein, Lachenmayer, Owens, Katz. �A1so present were Bab �offing, 8chaal District 197 Board Member and City Administrator Kevin Frazell. Parks Chair Stein said that he felt that the Council had mad� a bad decision in choosing the Southeast Area site for the Parks Bond Referendum, in essence �rashing a three year study process by the Commission. He indicated that the Commission probably would not be helping on the Referendum, and asked how the Council intended to handle th� marketing. Councilmember Cummins responded that he had agreed ta work an the Sibley sit� because of the ecanomic benefits. Hawever, he had been concerned about the ability to work with �chool District 197, and also thought it would be better for the City to have its own site. He felt that the Schoal Board really wanted to control the iacility, but nat gut much inta the praject financially. He disagreed wi�h S�ein that this meant dropping a three year processf and said tha� he did not see it as repudiation of the work previously done by the Parks Commi�sion. Parks Commissianer Laahenmayer said that she felt �ersonal pride and politics had taken over a rational decision. She felt that the Southeast Area site was not safe for children trying to bicycle to activities, and thought it was pre�erable to have it near a schooi with which children can identi�y. , Councilmember Hartmann responded that he thought adults were impvrtant too, and that the Sibley si�e was primarily for children. Jim Stein responded that he did not think that was the case. Councilmember Cummins said that he thought the entire Council was united in endorsin� the need for a park, and that there were only two alternat�ve sites left. Commissioner Lachenmayer said that she felt like the Counail was dealing with the desires o� a special interest graup, with which Commissioner Katz agreed. Bob Doffing said that the School Board was receptive to the City's proposal in continuing discussions. Mayor Mertensotta said that selling the band referendum was always tough, and that it was impartant ta get a�acility establzshed somewh�re. Stein responded that he thaught there was a real ques�ion whether the Cit� could possibly sell a bond issue to the voters. He indicated that last Spring everyone seemed to be united on �he S�bley site, and naw there was no cancensus at all. He said that he had equal questions as to whether a referendum for the Sibley site wauld pass, and raised the possibility of not including the athletic complex in the upcoming bond issue. Councilmember Blesener said that she couldn't personally support the Southeast Area for the complex, and a�reed it was prabably impossible to pass a referendum an any s�te now. She agreed that perhap� we should just do the trails and parks. • Cit� Administrator Frazell added that it would b� possible to divsde the question on the referendum ballat, separating neighborhoad park and trail improvements �rom the athletic complex. Councilmember Cummins said that he supported going with the Southeast Area site now, and that if that failed he wau�d be willing to work toward an athletia complex at the Sibley site. Commissioner Katz said that she thau�ht the whole process looked rather absurd to the public rlght now. Mayor Mertensotto suggested that a blue ribbon promotians committee be appointed, consisting of people who have not participated in the di�cus�ions to date, and so are not caught up in the controversy. . Chair Stein pointed out that the Council itself is less �han unanimaus on the propo�al. There was then some general discussion about the role the Parks Commission, and its recommendation in the process. It was noted that the Cauncil would be voting that same evening (December 1j on development plans for the Southeast Area, but . that those development plans had been construed such that it would not �'areclose po�sibilities for either constructing or el.iminating the Southeast Area park site. Chair Stein indicated that tha� put everyane under less ta.me pressure, and perhaps �here was still an opportunity to take a laok at both sites. � There�being no further disaussion, the meeting adjourned at appro�imately 8:45 o'clock A,M. 0 s Page No.2224 December 1, 1987 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, December 1, 1987 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember�Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Witt moved approval of the minutes of the November 19th meeting. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.� Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the consent calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda, amended to include item 9c, Poore variance application, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. . a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the November 24th Planning Commission meeting. b. Approval of a request from the Planning Commission to conduct a joint meeting on January 26th to discuss proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments. c. Acknowledgment of a letter from Mr.& Mrs. Douglas Geier, 1309 Kendon Lane, regarding the November 19th Council discussion on the Highway 55 Corridor Study. d. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for November. Page No.2225 December 1, 1987 e. Approval of the list of Contractor Licenses dated December 1, 1987 and attached hereto. f. Approval of the List of Claims dated December 1, 1988 and totaling $132,196.60. g. Approval of an application from Mr. Richard Poore, 1660 Dodd Road, for a variance from the rear yard setback requirement to allow construction of an attached garage within 25 feet of the rear property 1'ine at 1660 Dodd Road. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS School District Business Affairs Director Lois Rockney and School Board Member Bakewell were present to comment and ask for clarification on Council action of November 19th stipulating Comprehensive Plan�language relating to development of the School Forest property. Their concern related specifically to = stipulations on the use of the water area in calculating density for the property. As the result of the discussion, staff City Planner were directed to meet with School District representatives and the prospective developers of the property, if the concerns cannot be resolved, to the matter on the December 15th agenda. and the the and, place STREET LIGHTS The Council acknowledged a report from the Public Works Director recommending the award of bid for installation of commercial district street lights, along with communications from J. Sander of Davis & Associates, Inc and City Attorney Tom Hart regarding Mr. Sander's position relative to Hitech versus Sterner lights. � � Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 � After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-113, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS TO SERVE THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 11)," awarding the contract to Collins Electrical for a low bid of $321,198.00 for Alternate A. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Page No.2226 December 1, 1987 Councilmember Blesener asked why Sterner lights are not being installed at new City Hall. Staff was directed to notify the architects that Sterner lights should be installed. EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES Treasurer Shaughnessy reviewed the tabulation � of quotations received for the sale of $380,000 in Equipment Certificates. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-114, "RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $380,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF 1987, AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF," awarding the.sale to Norwest Securities for ' its low net rate of 6.176�. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEARING - HILLSIDE Mayor Mertensotto�opened the meeting for the CREEK IMPROVEMENTS purpose of a pub•lic hearing on proposed public improvements to serve the Hillside Creek Addition and adjacent areas. � Public Works Director Danielson reviewed the proposed project. He informed Council that the developer plans to do the grading within the plat area in the early spring and that the City would install the public utilities during the summer of 1988. He stated that while the project could be constructed to serve only the Hillside Creek plat, which would result in construction of a cul-de-sac at the end of Hillside, the Planning Commission has recommended that the street and utilities should be extended easterly, to Laura Lane. Mr. Danielson stated that the lots within the plat area could be assessed approximately $12,000 because the grading by the developer will create considerable savings for the project. With reference to the properties east of the plat, Mr. Danielson informed Council that the properties which would be affected are six platted 60 foot lots owned by the School District, and facing on the Brookside Lane right-of-way, which could be assessed about $63,000 -$21,000 per lot if the lots were combined into three 120 foot lots. He explained that the improvements to the properties outside of the plat are considerably greater because grading of the � Page No.2227 December 1, 1987 right-of-way and tree removal must be included in the City's construction contract. Mr. Danielson further stated that if the project is extended easterly,the platted lots on the south side of the Brookside right-of- way would also be assessed. He stated that if the lots were�combined into 120 by 120 foot lots, as recommended by staff, the assessments would be approximately $18,000 per lot. He pointed out that the Robinson lot already is served by sewer, water and street but has not been served by storm sewer. It was suggested that the lot be assessed for 25� of its frontage for street and storm sewer, for approximately $3,500. Councilmember Blesener asked why the costs are separated and why the two projects should not be considered as one even though the developer is doing his own grading. She felt that regardless of the developer grading the total project cost should�be divided by the number of lots affected. . Mr. Danielson responded that it is a single� project but that what makes it more costly for the easterly properties is the cost of grading that portion of the project --- this is a small project and the cost of grading and significant tree removal will be high. In response to a comment from Mr. Anderson that one excavator should be hired for the entire project, Mr. Danielson stated that if Mr. Anderson could work out an agreement with the other land owners to share an excavator it would be a good solution. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr. Blum stated that he owns a 60 by 125 foot lot which will be combined with the Schomaker lot in the future to create a single 120 by 125 foot lot Mayor Mertensotto felt the proposed assessments were very high for the lots outside of the plat, particularly for substandard lots. School District Director of Business Affairs Lois Rockney stated that the District has no plans for its lots at this ti}ne and that she Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No.2228 December 1, 1987 and Board Member Bakewell are present just to see what is planned by the City. Mr. Bakewell stated that the School Board is not crazy about the possibility of $60,000 in assessments for the project. Councilmember Blesener stated that she would like to see what the actual costs could be before taking action on the project. Public Works Director Danielson suggested Council order plans and specifications and bidding so tha� costs can be known, and further suggested that extension of the services to the properties outside of the could be treated as a deduct alternate. that plat Mr. Schomaker asked whether the Council would consider vacating the alley right-of-way. It was the consensus of Council that staff should initiate the process necessary for vacating the unneeded rights-of-way and alley easements in the area. t Council discussed the desirability of continuing the street name Brookside Lane through the Hillside Creek plat rather than using Hillside Avenue as shown on the proposed plat. Mr. Anderson stated that he would have no objection to changing the street name to Brookside. , There being no further questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed at 8:36 P.M. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-115, "RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS, AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE HILLSIDE CREEK AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 87, PROJECT NO. 2)," on the basis that extension of the public improvements to the property east of the plat and construction of a foot bridge across the creek to the Somerset School be specified as "deduct alternates." Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Page No.2229 December l, 1987 Mr. Anderson stated that he will get a cost estimate from his excavator for grading of the total street right-of-way and will contact the affected property owners. , CA5E NO. 87-29, Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the LEARNING TREE purpose of a public hearing on an application from Learning Tree for conditional use permit. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: o Council acknowledged a report from Public Works Director Danielson informing Council that the applicant again requested that the hearing be continued and recommending that the hearing be closed and readvertised when the applicant is prepared to bring a proposal to Council. � Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no Councilmember closed. • Councilmember questions or comments, Witt moved that the hearing be Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved to direct staff to notify the applicants that the hearing has been closed and that they must reapply for consideration when they are ready to proceed. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. HEARING - CENTEX Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on applications from Centex Homes for rezoning, conditional use permit for planned unit development and preliminary plat approval for Kensington. Administrator Frazell reviewed his reports and recommendations. Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern over considering approval of the requests contingent on Metropolitan Council approval of the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Administrator Frazell responded that the Metropolitan Council approvals should be back by the December 15th meeting. Councilmember Blesener stated that she must leave the December 15th meeting early and that Page No.2230 December 1, 1987 she would prefer to deal with the requests tonight. Mr. Dick Putnam, from Tandem Corporation, reviewed the history of the project, stating that Sketch Plan A had been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and that subsequently the Council asked the developers to prepare alternatives which would prbvide area for a community recreation facility on the property. He stated that Sketch Plan B was then prepared. Mr. Putnam reviewed Plan A, which provides for 540 units on 81 acres, and Plan B, which provides 500 units and incorporates approximately 23 acres of additional land to the east of the original project, and includes 40 acres of park and 62 acres of developable land. He stated that Sketch Plans A and B are being submitted to the Council, that both have been recommended by the Planning Commission who suggested that both plans be kept active because a referendum would be necessary before the City could acquire the community athlet�c complex land area. He stated that keeping both plans active is acceptable to Centex and that Phase I of the development works with the Plan B park alternative and also with the Plan A alternative. Mr. Tom Boyce, from Centex Homes, reviewed the proposed unit types. Mr. Putnam reviewed the site characteristics and street locations. He stated that the Planning Commission has suggested that the entire road be built at once but that the developers would prefer not to do that because they are planning to begin the project with three units in the west side of the site. He stated that the first phase will be a mix of 4 and 8 unit condominium buildings ranging in unit size from 1072 square feet to almost 1500 square feet and that some of the units will have walk-out basements. He informed Council that in the planning report for the project, the City Planner expressed concern over the number of parking spaces and asked that proof of additional parking capability be shown on the drawings. He then explained how the proof of parking was incorporated into the drawings. Mr. Boyce reviewed sketches of the buildings and the units, stating that the developer will Page No.2231 December 1, 1987 mix 4 and 8 unit manor homes throughout the site and that all of the units will have at least one attached garage. He explained that the provision of walk-outs in the units around the ponds is a new concept,untried in condominium developments. He explained that base purchase prices will vary from $70,000 to $82,000 and that various options could average $10,000 to $15,000. He stated that it is anticipated that 30 � of the buyers will be in management, 25� in sales, 25� professionals and 15 to 20� retired. In response to a question from Councilmember Blesener, Mr. Boyce stated that approximately half of the buildings will have basements and that if there is a demand, more may be added. Councilmember Blesener asked whether the buyer proportion is specific to this project and asked how the development will get by with one car, one garage per unit. Mr. Boyce stated that there will be at least one enclosed parking space for each unit an� that a percentage of the buyers will be empty nesters and single people. He stated that two-car garages will be proposed in another phase of the development but that because a garage must face the street, the buildings in this phase would get too long if all units had double garages. He stated that it is definitely a trade-off for the buyer and that many could not afford the additional expense. He explained the experience he had had with a Manor Home project in Edina where detached garages had been constructed to respond to a Council request for additional enclosed spaces. Councilmember Blesener objected to parking proposed off the public streets, and stated that she does not see the need for providing as much guest parking as is shown in the proof of parking. Mr. Putnam stated that while the City regulations allow guest parking on the street, he feels it is safer to provide spaces off-street and that the spaces will be plowed by the Association. He stated that, not counting spaces in front of the garages, there are 213 parking spaces and that there are 161 garages. He stated that he has tried to address the Planner's concern that there be Page No.2232 December 1, 1987 1.5 parking spaces per unit, not counting the spaces behind the garages. Councilmember Cummins stated that there are only 15 of the 136 units which have 2 garages and that he feels that up to half of the project could have double garages occupied by vehicles. He and Councilmember Blesener both indicated that they would rather give up some of the guest parking to provide for more garages. Mr. Putnam responded that Centex has not yet built a building with a 2-car garage and that if Cente.x finds that there is a demand for two-car rather�than single car garages they could be added to the buildings. He stated that he is concerned that it is not known whether people would be willing to pay an additional $4,000 to $5,000 for the extra garage space, and that the buyers must make that decision. He pointed out that the model units would have two car garages on one end of the building and one-car garages on the other end. t There was brief discussion over street right- of-way widths and front yard setbacks. Councilmember Cummins asked whether the City could require, in approval of a PUD, that 25� of the units (34 units) must be constructed with two-car garages. He stated that he feels it is a public safety issue. He also stated that if the developer is going to pursue the market he identified, more people will want two car garages than are provided. Mr. Boyce responded that the question is whether the buyers will want to pay the additional cost. Councilmember Blesener suggested that since the project will be phased, the two-car garages could be tested in the first phase reconsidered in later phases if necessary. Mr. Boyce stated that if people want two garages he would have no objection to building them but that he would prefer not to be required to do so. Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the Council must be very careful in what it requires since it does not want to get into the position of Page No.2233 December 1, 1987 getting rental housing rather than owner- occupied. Mr. Boyce stated that he understands the Council's desire, that if people want two-car garages he will be glad to build them and will make sure to push for them in his marketing efforts. Councilmember Blesener felt that the guest parking provided in the proof of parking is overkill. Mr. Boyce stated that he would prefer to build the plan as originally proposed, with 2.4 spaces per unit, that additional spaces can be added to increase the ratio to 2.9. He suggested that this could be a stipu].ation in the developers agreement - that more spaces be available if needed, and indicated that he would be willing to bond for this requirement as part of the developer's agreement. Councilmember Blesener stated that the guest parking should be off of private drives and� not off of public streets. She also suggested that the developers show proof of the possibility that additional garages could be added. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mrs. Celia Kennedy asked whether there is a possibility of reducing the number of units to allow for two-car garages. Mr. Ultan Duggan suggested that 50� of the first units be required to have two garages. Mr. James Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, reminded the Council of petitions submitted in the past in opposition to any increase in density on the property. He also strongly recommended that the Council require two-car garages. Mr. Bruce Richall, 2374 Apache Court, stated that he just moved to Mendota Heights from a similar type of development in Roseville where everyone had double garages and the entire development looked like garages. He felt that there must be some kind of compromise or the development will look like a sea of garages. Page No.2234 December 1, 1987 Mr. Putnam stated that multi-family developments typically include one garage per unit. He pointed out that the townhouse development in a future phase of the project inaludes two-car garages for each unit, but that the units are considerably more expensive. He stated that the developers are trying to appeal to many different people and is not tryinq to have each of his projects appeal to everyone. Mr. Boyce stated that he plans to build a model building and then pre- sell into buildings and that the buyers will determine what they want. He indicated that the buildings will take about five months each to construct. Mr. Putnam stated that the developers are experimenting to some degree: where the buildings have a walk-out level it is more costly and many people don't want walk-outs. He stated that the developers will experiment with what the market wants and that the largest unit, basement included, will be about 2300 square feet. He expected that the buyers of those units will want two-car garages. � Mr. Losleben stated that in all past discussions he has not seen manor homes and that all the townhouses had double garages. Mr. Putnam responded that he has shown slides of every project Centex has built and that perhaps the reason Mr. Losleben has not seen the proposed manor homes is because at one of the earlier meetings Council asked him to add basements and two car garages and larger units to what Centex had proposed. He stated that to say that he has not shown condominium units as well as townhouses is not true and that he has represented precisely what Centex has built. The only changes made to the buildings were done to respond to what Council has asked. - Mayor Mertensotto suggested continuing the hearing until a response has been received from the Metropolitan Council on the Comprehensive Plan amendments. He pointed out that the Council options are to table action or to make action contingent on Metropolitan Counc'il approval and that what is before the Council is consideration of a conditional use permit for Phase I of Kensington and sketch Page No.2235 December 1, 1987 plan approval for the entire Kensington development. Councilmember Cummins felt that some of the parking spaces should be removed. He also stated that Council hasn't made any changes in the comprehensive plan for the housing areas south of Mendota Heights Road since the Southeast Area amendments were made two years ago. He pointed out that there is high density indicated in the sketch plan where the comprehensive plan shows MR. He asked whether the Council would be backing into a change by approving the proposed sketch plan. Administrator Frazell stated that Council could either go through a comprehensive plan amendment process but that Planner Dahlgren has stated that combining and averaging the district, if the total density is consistent with the density in the comprehensive plan, is allowed in the PUD ordinance. In response to a concern expressed by Mayor Mertensotto, Administrator Frazell stated that both he and Planner Dahlgren are confident that what the process being followed is consistent with the comprehensive plan. City Attorney Tom Hart concurred with the statements made by Administrator Frazell and stated that he would be prepared to document his support in writing should the Council so desire. Councilmember Cummins noted that Plan A includes 540 units on 81 acres of land and that Plan B indicates 500 units on 102 acres or 62 acres after park space is excluded. Regarding Plan A, Mr. Putnam stated that there are 540 units proposed on 80 acres, 10.5 acres of which is park property and 10 acres of which is trails, leaving 60 acres of land on which to construct the 540 units. Plan B is approximately 100 acres, 60 acres of which is developable and on which 500 units are proposed. Councilmember Cummins noted that density under Plan B is roughly 25� less than Plan A in terms of overall acres. Mr. Putnam responded that while the statement is true it is unfair in a sense since a g'reat deal of the property is taken out of housing and put into park. He pointed out that Plan B Page No.2236 December 1, 1987 is actually more dense than Plan A in the area that is being developed. He stated that the developers had planned on lower density units, more single family and townhouses, on Plan A, and that the simplest action would be for the City to buy the park land at the price the developer pays for it and the developer could then develop Plan A with MR and LR types of housing. Mr. Ultan Duggan stated that as a Planning Commission member he voted against Plan A and for Plan B. Mr. Bernard Friel stated that during the discussions on the Southeast Area amendments several years ago one of the motivations for multiple family rather than single family was aircraft noise and among the items discussed was that there are less entrances and fewer outdoor amenities in multiple family developments. He stated that he does not see that that is present in these plans. He asked whether an EAW was prepared and if one had been submitted to the Metropolitan Council.� Responding to the density issue, he stated that it doesn't matter if HR and MR are next to each other, the City must stick to the comprehensive plan, and he disagreed with Administrator Frazell and Attorney Hart on the issue. With reference to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Administrator Frazell responded that the EAW has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council and all other agencies as required. Councilmember Cummins stated that Council is being asked to approve Plan B which shows a community park. He informed the audience that there was a great deal of concern at a joint meeting with the Park Commission this morning over whether a bond issue c�ould be passed in the spring. He stated that before Council proceeds any further with Plan B he would like to have an assurance from Mr. Friel of his support for a community park in this area, as submitted in Plan B. Mr. Friel stated that without respect to what happens to the remainder of the area he will do everything he can to support a bond issue Page No.2237 December 1, 1987 to raise funds to provide a park on the subject property. Mr. Losleben stated that he would strongly support the proposed location of a community park and that he would spend more time in support of the bond issue than he has spent in getting petitions against development of this proj ect . Mr. Duggan agreed and stated that if the City approves Plan A it will be a loser and he will work very strongly in support of the recreation area. There being no further questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be continued to 8:00 P.M. on December 15th. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ' Administrator Frazell suggested that Council . adopt the proposed ordinance number 245 to implement the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment. � Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Ordinance No. 245, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ZONING ORDINANCE." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Mr. Putnam expressed concern over timing. He stated that there are a number of legal details that must be accomplished between any approvals and January 1st, that if what Centex is proposing is acceptable to the Council a number of agreements must be drafted. He stated that if he must start again from ground zero on December 15th he may run out of time in drafting and getting agreements to the Council. He stated that there has been a great deal of discussion over the development and asked whether Council wants him to proceed with what he believes Council wants. Administrator Frazell stated that the City's staff and the developer should proceed with drafting agreements now so that they are ready for Council review on the fifteenth. He stated that Council has raised many good issues tonight and that staff can proceed to draft what he believes Council wants. RECESS Page No.2238 December 1, 1987 Mayor Mertensotto called a recess at 10:35 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:44 P.M. DAMAGE CLAIM The Council acknowledged a Bernard Karon, 1781 Summit incurred as the result of which occurred during City July storm. Council also associated report from the Director. Ayes: 5 Nays: o claim from Mr. Lane, for'damages a "water hammer" clean-up after the acknowledged an Public Works Mr. Karon, present for the discussion, informed Council on the damage and the damage repairs which were required. He explained that he is asking to be reimbursed for his time and that of his wife because they chose to do the clean-up rather than hiring it done commercially at estimated costs of $180 to $250. After discussion on the matter, Councilmember Hartmann moved that Mr. Karon be reimbursed $200 for damages subject to his submission of a release to the City. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. PARK PLACE 2ND ADDITION On the recommendation of the Planning Commission, Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the preliminary plat for the Park Place 2nd Addition. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CRAY RESEARCH Mr. Mark Merrill, from Architectural Alliance, was present to request approval of the issuance of a building permit for an 8300 , square foot computer facility addition to the southwest corner of the Cray facility adjacent to Highway 13. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CITY HALL FINANCING Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the issuance of the requested building permit subject to staff review and approval of the plans. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. •Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-116, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FUND TRANSFERS FOR CITY HALL �ONSTRUCTION." Ayes: 5 Nays: o AMM POLICIES Page No.2239 December 1, 1987 Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Council briefly discussed the proposed 1988 ANII�I Legislative Policies. BOARD OF REVIEW Councilmember Hartmann moved that the annual Board of Review for 1988 be conducted at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 12, 1988. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 RAILROAD CROSSING On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-117, "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SOO LINE RAILROAD PERMIT NO. 27743," to allow the City to auger a watermain casing under the tracks at Northland Drive and T.H. 55. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PERSONNEL The Council acknowledged and briefly discussed a report from the City Administrator responding to a Council request concerning Public Works use of overtime hours. YORKTON IMPROVEMENTS The Council acknowledged a report from the Public Works Director and letters from Robert J. Huber, representative for Brown & Cris, � Inc., relative to a claim from Brown & Cris for compensation for extra costs in connection with the Yorkton Centre Pointe South contract. City Attorney Tom Hart stated that the claim is in the amount of $6,130. It was noted that litigating the issue could be more costly than settling the claim, and after discussion, it was Council consensus to direct Attorney Hart to negotiate the matter with authorization to settle the claim for an amount not to exceed $3,000. MISCELLANEOUS Council acknowledged a request from Mr. & Carey, 976 Douglas Road, for waiver of the building permit fee for remodeling work required as the result of storm damage to their home. It was Council consensus that permit fee should be waived. Mrs. f��L Page No.2240 December 1, 1987 . COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Hartmann informed the Council • that he would be late for the December 15th meeting. Councilmember Blesener informed the Council that she must leave the December 15th meeting early. Councilmember Blesener asked that staff check the condition of the streets in the Furlong area in response to the letter from the Geiers. There was brief discussion on noticing the Furlong area residents that pumping of septic systems.onto streets and yards is illegal. ADJOURN There being no further business'to come before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:10 P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF GONTR.ACTOR5 TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 1, 1987 Cancrete License: Tom ostertag Masonry . Excavatinct License: Dakota Plumbing Gas Piping License: Air Flaw Systems, Inc. Bruce Nelson Plumbing & Heating General Contractors Licenses. Christ Construation, Inc, C.J. Hames The Joseph Company, Inc. Kingswood Etuilders, Inc. RK & T Construction, Inc. Heatina & Air Conditionina License: Red Wing Heating & Air Conditzoning, Tnc. i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ' MEMO � December 3, 1987 � T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. az�-� ty Administrator SUBJECT: Letter from MN Dot District 9 Regarding Dodd/I-494 Interchange Attached is the letter we requested from MN Dot District 9 staff, rec�arding the potential upgrading of the Dodd/I-494 intersection. As you can see, the letter doesn't make a very definitive commitment to MN Dot's needs one way or another. However, the need for the letter was first raised by the potential redesignation of land at this intersection for the Dodd Corners Commercial Center. Since Council has declined to amend the Comprehensive Plan to accommodate that project, the issue is moot for the time being. . ' KDF:kkb � 0 0 t1'��4 '�' �o_ � a F- �'� ��rOfi TRP�� Minnesota Department of Transportatian District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55109 November 24, 1987 Telephone ��-1175 Mr. Jar�es E. Danieison, P.E. Public Works pirector City of Mendata Heights � 750 South P1aza Drive Mendata Meights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Danielson: As you requested in yaur letter of November 3, 1987, District staff has exar�3ned the plan attached to your letter regarding ihe interchange of TH 149 and I-494. At this time, it is difficult to predict whether or nat any future upgrading of the interchange will require additional right of way in the vicinity of the proposed Dodd Corners. Trips generated by the Mendota Heights pro- posal, in combination with trips generated by proposals in the city of Eagan, may overload the present canfiguration of the interchange. The city of Eagan has stated via phone conversations with District staff that deveiop�nent praposals far the area southeast af this 9nterchange may not be finalized until January of 1988. Therefore, the number of new trips using the interchange that are generated by development proposals in bath Mendota Heights and Eagan is tao difficult to determine at this time. Equa1ly difficult to determine is what configuratian a redesigned interchange would take, and whether ar not it wouid require additionaI right of way. Costs af any reconstruction deemed necessary would probably have to be borne by the City(ies), or passibly, by developers making proposals in the area that will 9r�pact the interchange and the regianai roadway network. Any modifications to existing interchanges are subject to the Metropo]itan Cauncil`s Metrapalitan Highway Interchanqes paiicy and pracedures for appro- val. Mn/pOT supports this policy. . S' ly. ...._ �� Richard A. Elasky, .E. Assistant District Engineer Traffic and Planning An Equai Opportunity Emptoyer CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, NOVEMBER, 1987 DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5 1/2� Savings Account 5 1/2� , Savings Cert. 3-88 @ 6.64� Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 12-4-87 @ 6 3/8� Savings Cert. 3-1-88 @ 6.65� ' Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. U.S. TREASURY BILLS Treasury Notes: January 31, 1988 March 31, 1988 July 31, 1988 BALANCE $32,750.08 442.96 25,000.00 $58,193.04 200,000.00 125,000.00 $425,000.00 13,952.59 438,952.59 1,100,000.00 100,000.00 7.12 (lmm) 7.50 (500m) 7.66 (200m) GOV'T, SECURITIES FUND, 10.7� $1,003,437.50 499,687.50 198,250.00 $1,701,375.00 COLLATERAL $ 325,000.00 $1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $3,398,520.63 MENDtITA NEIGEiTS FIRE aEPARTMENT NOYEMBER MONTHLY REPORT Fih.. �ALLS 87-243 Thru 87-265 . � �t FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER STRUCTUItE CONTENT5 MISC. TOTALS TU DATE CAMMERCIAL � • � �2�� ,� � . RESI DENTIAL ' 2 $250,000 $12�,00� � 100 $414,Q30 1 � $2�,1 �p . $0 z �z�a�oao � � z�,oaa � � o0 5 MONTNLY LOSS TOTALS MENflUTI� NEIGHT5 i ACL Fi RES, ALL ARE�S $375,1 �0 $441,23� MEND. NTS. ON1.Y SiRtJC:T1CONTENTS $41 �,Q�O MEND. HTS.ONLY MIS�ELLANEO�tS ��'6,�01? 2 MEN�. HTS. TOTAL COS� TQ GATE $�41,2?C� S � StLL1liG fQR SERYiCES 2 AGENCY TNF� MOlITN TO DaTE QTHER � 2 TOTA� CALLS 23 MN,�DOT �0 � MIl1N. RR �C� L�QCATIOM OF fIRE ACARMS: TO QATE LA5T YE�MR CNR RR $2,3�'? � OTHERS: MENDOTA NfIGHTS ` 16 2f 9 159 $0 MENDOTA t � 12 TOTALS: $0 $2,329 SUNfiSN LAKE 15 i 3 Ff RE MAR5H�L'S TI ME FOR MONT#f P�UMBER �lF CALLS 23 YEHICLE FIRES CONTRACT FIRES (ALL) RESCUE MEDICAL ASSISTS GRASS,BRUSH & NU YAtUE NAZARDOUS SI1U�Ti0N FALSE Al,Af2M �CRIMINAL �" �E ALARM - COMMERCIAL FALSE Al.ARM - RES1flEt�CE �� L1iYDALE 5 17 25 OTNER 1 8 2 7UTAL 23 265 211 WDRK PERFURMED � HUURS TO DATE LAST YEAR � CALLS 614 5724 4005 .._�TINGS 58 681 4$2 pRILLS � 79 888 564 4�tEEKlY CLfpN-UP 54 642 697 SPECIA4 TRRINING 92 355 147 ADMlNI$TATlYE ' 169 1400 47b FtRE MARSNAI 81 752.5 607 T[1TA1 S 1 l.r,7 1 ft44�' � 7fi?A ' 1 NSPECTIONS i N�lESTIGATIONS RE-iNSFECTIDN MEET! NGS ADMlNISTRATION SPEClAL PRQJECTS TOTAL �.� 1 t�.5 SYNOP�IS The Fire aeptartment respond to 23 cslls during the month of No�aember. Onl� one of the calls resulted in fire los�. This cali was on �+edrtesdey �lovember i 1 to 1171 Hunter Ler�e. The Disp�tcher recieved the flrst cell trom the nwner of the residence et Midnite and he stated that the whole house w�s on fire. The first police offi�cer erriving on ihe scene reporied thet �he house w�s fully involved. Three pumpers end �wo hydrants were needed t� control the fire end West St. Paul Fire �ras put 4n stand-by to caver aur city. it toak the department better th�n 1 hour to bring the flre under control. Mlhii�e the Department did an excellent job contralling the fire end not �liowing any fire damege to the first ftoar of the residence, heevy smake end water damage to thet level has caused the insursnce company �o lebel the house e#.otal ]oss. The mas�. recent dallar value wss gfven as �454,040.04. The caus�e of the fire wes 1nu�stlget�d by Pnul K�fse�r �nd the State Fire Mershal's atfice and de#ermfned to be spvntaneous cambustinn. On Navember 34, �t 4340 h�aurs, Y�est S#.. Feul requested us to move up #o their station for st�nd-�y. Their department h�d respon�ded to a Mutual Aid fnc#denE in South St. Peui where e tractor-tr�iler unft carrying hazardaus materials had cr�shed into a structure on Concord sireet end sterted to burn. Units from inver Grove Heights, South St. P�ui,l�esi St. Pau1 snd the State of Minnesots Department vf Public 5afety Handied the situation. r r An explenation of the use nf our new pumper iengine 2282} was mad� by Jim Kirvida af Custom Fire, the msnufecturer 4f the pumper. The cl�ss was held on the spperatus floor af the stetion, Using 2282 as the prop, Kirvido explained the chassls and power trairr of the unft and the cnrrect opersting prv�cedures fnr the fire pump. For the maksup drill, firefighters viewed a video tape of Jim Kirvide's Thursd�y night presentetion. Flrefight�rs also vlsited 1477 Highway 13 to preplsn ha�r to fighx a fire ir� th�t building. Thirteen Members of the Deparim�nt elso started ihe 1fi ho�ur first Responder r�efresher course et our st�tion. This course is needed to keep their First �espand�er Certificatiar� current. '`FIRE DEPARTMENT M4NTNLY WORK P£RFORMANCE �OR liOYE#"1BER i 987 ` ........................................... :t....................� ................ ..T........................... .............. ........................ ....... ..................... ................... ....................j.........»...... . . ..........................................�:......................,j.................... :............. .. ..�i....,.............. j.............................i.... ..... j,.........................s........................:.........................;.................. , ... ........... ii.�.� FOR ��1QidTN :: f i RE ; f 1 RE � PERCE NT ::CLfAN: MONTHLY : GEN : Q�f ICER :SPEC1�1.� ftRST =SREC1� ...�.�.......�3 .................:'••CALLS..�CALLS�ATTENDE,D� ...UP. ..DRILL.....�MTG:....MTG"...�LEANUP�....RE5P....�.....ACT. ..............................................::......................;.....................:........,.................... ...; ...................¢.............................;................,.........................,............................................. �...._.........,.. ..... `tErR TO DATE :: ATT'D ; ATT`D = TNIS :: 2: 2 2.: 2 5 3 ...........................................................................:.................................;....... . . .........................................:........... . ..:........................:.................. ,.26,5 ' ' ::MOHTH: YEAR : YEAR ::HOURS� HOURS :NRS.��NOURS � HOUR� : NOURS HOUR .... .... .............................,............................................,......................,....................:...............,............ ;.............;..........................;............_......._.._........�._....�. .._.._.__.. ..... ....................................... �q...................,. �.....................�...»........................,.� �....... ... ...................».. ...... ...... ..... ....».+«......................�.....»............ ....... ...:... ...�.......»..,.:... • �=HIEF �Ir�hn Maczku:: 11 : 10? : 40� :: � � : 2 ; ...2.. ._... ...�.. : 3 . ............... �r;:�ST.��E�iii I.er�s......,'. ....� �............7$, . ......2��.......,.......�......,...........�........ .z...:..........2..........;........� ...... .......�..... ........_.. ..............................................:�..................... ;.....................:...............................: ;................... ; ....._.....................;............ :............_.......... ................... ._..._....._......;.... , ..:.. ..:; ...................:.............................€,,....2................ 2...........:...................,....:...........3 ._.._�.;_......._...,... i=�f'T. i�..eitt� �t��.�...i:. .....�.2......,.. .-i_38 ..... `2� .... ... � ... .._.... �. .........; .............�..........................�....._.................:._......._...._.��.:.__..___... P9Ul L!t'�Yl�r� ............ .::._....�.3... ..f 07. .:.. ..4U�& ... ... � ... ........ � ....... � ...... ........:.....,....`�..........:...._...................�...._.__._... ..;:.. ..:.. ..;... Jarnle�ter�b3.......;.......;;......,�.�......;. ..�.Z�...�. ...,.4696 " ..2. _ ..�. ..i..2. j ..z. 5 , 3 : --..._ ....................................... :;......................;.....................:........., ................... :.:...... ... ....... .........:..... ......�............ ........ ..... .......;._.......... _........,..._...... ..... tlike Cuunan ' 13 ' 1 f 4 439� _� 2 � 3 2= � �5 3 ..;: ...................:,,...........................:.............;..........................;....,................� :........................ :..__.__...�. ...............................................::......................;.................... ;.......:.................,... : : 2 3 2 4 Gr�r�J�d.S�',}er.vFr�.........::.......14.......�......1.27 ;,........48� ..........:.:...... ... ........ ._.......;.........,..:........_.._.......... ..... ...._.:....................._.:.__........�.. ........... . ........ ........ ...:... .. .. , ..._ .. ... ... Ed Adr�iarr �: 12 � 1 i 8' : 459� :' 2: 2 ; Z� ` 3 ; 3 .................. ........................... ........................................... :...............................,...................,...............,.............; ............,...............�.........;......................... .........._......... ........_.. F'�t t;r�iqht '• 1 U 112 '• 429� . 2.... ..._ ................... ' .Z.. _................... ........._....... ` ....�............ ' .............. ................... ..............._........ €,.....................:........,............;...............................;;........... . ..:... ... ...;... ..,:... Peter Vili�rd :: l� : 26 = � �ra:1.�aJ .;.. .;.. ...�.. ' ..��,. ...........................................�:...................... �,....................�...... �........................��................�r.C�,,...........................:.............+..........................+........................:....»...................i......«. ; ... ; . : : Dar�iel Earret# :: 0 : 65 € � �N IN.E/�v�. _ � '• � ° ................................................:.......................:...................................................--� :... ........;.............................;........... .:.......................... : .._..._.......,..._.:............___..__;...._.......... :... ...........................................ii......................o.................... :................. .......pe...................q....:........................i..... ...3..................,.......�...................«...:........................ '...«.._.»...« ....... ;CkPT. John Neska ;: 7 : 148 : SE�9b :'s ... 2 ... ..........�'......... � 2 � � � ..3........ .................. ...�........, ...: ............:................................... ... ..:... ..;... '8il�i Ct�islrt' ............... ..,.......,.�... ...1 �.�. ..,..... .57� .... ... �� .. ........ .... ....... _............_..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..........._. �........... ........... . .......... ... ... .. ...... .... . ..; j.. ..;.. .. j». ..;... �Marc�Cr�nr►oll. ..:�. .12. ..:....123� �409&. .2. ..3. .z. .3. _. .3. �. ��,#�tre Gnr�luon ......... .�;.........�..... . .��....q.........JIItY...... .....� .... ..........�...........q.....�. ..................... .......�........�.....................�,;..............., ' .... ........................... ' ... . ... � . .. ..... ....... .......ap...................j.......................,.....:.............�........................,.j.......................:........«....»....»...:................. �Gick.��wirn ..,�. .1.Z. ..:......70. �... ..269& :: 2 = 3 = 2 : : 3 � _ .... . . .... . ................ :;..... . .. . ..� .�...r�... ..;.. ... . � J� � .... .,� . �. ... ........ . .,��... ...... ..g.. ..� . ...... ..� . ...... ..... ...�.�.... ....... j.. ...,. . �. ......y.. .......»..... �;Yr�r�� .Lpwe .................;€. .....�.�.. ....:... . ..... ::... . . ...... . .. . : . ......._............_.......;........._...........�;........_......_......:..._.�..._... ,.:. ...................;.............................;..... 2 .... i rn F�e r r�a n : .14.. ..1.3 7. :. ..S 2 9� 2 3 � ..,... .. ........... � ................... � .............. ............................................ ::..................... ;............. .. ....:................... .... .............. ........ .........:............,:............ ...... . ..... ..:... ..;... M� I�p Maryc.ul�a :. S • 39 � : �.. ._.:.. ...:.. ..3... : 2 : ...:._ : �....�.._. ..............................................e;......................�...................,.:.,........................,....ai...................�............................. ..... ....i.....................,....�....................... :...................... . .. ............................................i�..................... :..................... j.....,.,...................... j.;........ ... ........ ........ ... ..................... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. ...... .. ,.„... C.aPT..�Fff Stenh�u�:........�.3.......:......}.�.� .....:.........45� ......*:.......`�........;......_....�............�.....�....;..........................6..........5....�.,.'•...........3.........';•,..._..._.�... ............... ..., . ,,..... ... . ...... . . �F.�'4�..hJu�vk ..................€: 15 ; 124 € 473� :� Z � ....... �'. ...... ` Z � � ................. � 3 = . .. .t ...................... ....... $ 4......,..........3 2 9� .......... ....... .2........; ... ,. ... ...;,............, ..........................,.... ...;........................;..........._... Grt+t:9F t�to8ck at`. � t f � :: ' = 3 '' 2 : : ; : ..::....._............: ..................._....... :...........,.;....,.....................:........................:...............,........ :....__......... .......... .................................:�._...................,.....................;..........................._ . . . Lbmbert Derks :€ 12 : 114 : 43� :: 2 3 � 2: 5 � � GEa ra...� .t1os�� k J r..... .'...... ..1.5 . .. . ..� .� 3 . ..... .... . f� � � . .... ... ..� . ... ........ ..3. ..........:.. ..2 . ..........,.......... .....................:.. .............._..._;.. ..._..._.... .. . . ....... . . . . . . .. : ....� :......................�....................:...........................,.,,� `•........_.........�. �..... ....... .,.... .........+........................:...,................,....'_....._.......... .�i.. 4� t • �. ..q... . . Te+��Husr�ik.. ........ �� ' 74 � 289� � .3. � .2. .2. 4 : : ..:.. :...................:......... .........:........................:..............,. �1�1ikE M��zko ............ ...--.....1.4... ...�.7�.............669�..... ....2.... .........�......... ..2. . . ... ... ....... .............. ..y� ...................p...................«........5............y................... ..�......... ......... .........» . t:e�iri Fert-c�n .............;;. ....�.�........4.._..�a... ......359b... 2 .. ........3.......... .�.. ..................... ................... ................... ............. ..............................................: ;...................... :....................;...............................:.;...... . . ..... ..;... ... ..:... ..;... : : ..; j........0........+ .............................:.............�p..........................�........................:..................»..,..:..........,.....� ...............................................j:......................j.................... �............................. �:�,�'T. i:efi �+iiryGk �: 7 ; i �I�S � �i � : 2 : 2 : 2 : = : T��r��r'��eir�zettpj.....:...........4...... ....9�,....;........3?.�...... ; .....Z.... '...........�...........;....0 . .. ..................... : .....................;.......................:.._........... ...............................................�:......................*.....................:................. . ....».;q....«.«............�.............................3.... ....j...........».............j................,...... � ....,.»».........» .........»., .... .. . ...:.... T� rI ;E : �� : 24� ;; � ; {� : �a ' • . : a rr�.... l u n� .......................e......... �.........;....................................................._ :...... ... ........ ..........:............ ;..,............�....... ..._...............:........................:......._....... _Ir�rin L��V.k.n............ ` ... � �' ... ' . 193 ......73� .... " ... � ... ` ....... 3 ....... 2 ' .................... '' ...... ..... ..... 3 ..... ............. ..�:. .... ».�.. ..o�.. ,.;... ..+... ..*.. ._�irr� Kilt�E�r�1 � L. ..115 43�. ..2.. ....... .� ...... .2 ..................... .......� �. . . .�..�.. __...._... ..: ............ :... ..... , _:... _ ... �..;... Ran�i�a Mchlam�ra,. .'z.......,.�... ....�.�.....:.......34�..... _......... .3. 2.. . . C�j ..a: ...................:.............................:......... ..:...... ......,............;................,.......':........................ ; _.... ........ ft'irk �c#'�rtridt...........;:. ....��......q....�.��. ......JL�..... .., ... ...»... O .....» .........«....»».. .,,.....« ......... .....«».......... ».......».. .. e ............. J... .:. ..;... .. �... Aaron Coa#es ............. ::........,.$.... ..1.7�...„.......679�.... .2� . .......3 ....... 2 ...........,......._ ..... ,,.. ..., ..... _........... ..e:.... ......;... .. ., ......�; ..................;... . ..+... ..;... �l�rn Y�Gisenbur*.�r ..�.�. ..�g. ..�.. 2.. ..........�......... .2 . .................._. .......�........ .......3........ ,........_., .. . . .. . ...... . . . . .....................................�.......:l......................:.....................;......«.......................� "............. ......�.« .... ...¢... ... ... ..;.» .... ..p._. ...............................................p:...................,,.w.................... :...............................�0..................,�..........................«.:......... ...,j..............,............ j.,.....�.......»......I............. .......... ..... �` TOTt�� ATTENDED :: 27• ; 3'�.� : 30 : 6 � 15 : 1.1 �... ..0.. ..............................................':s..............................._.........................._................_...................................................,...� �...............�.� ...................5 �........:.........3 3.....,_;..........p .. TUTAL MAN HGURS �: 54 : 7'� � ' ` .............................................;:...,........................._.............;........................�.....,..,.................,.............................,_.._.......;................._.......:..................,._. :.......,_......_... ..._........ ...............................................::. :..................s.........._.�......;...............................: :................... ;.... ,. .;..._.....,. ;........................ ............�.......;............_...._....:......_._.... . ..................... ._:... ...................... THI"a r10NTH :L�►5T MONTN:: : LAST YEA�t ; : ' = .... ... ........._.. �;1'E. kU��l�lt•IAN 11.47 . ............... €XXXXXXXXXX'�...................��XXXXXXXX. ...................................:.................... ....�.... _ .. ............................................::........,............ :...............................................�.... :..._............ .. .. .. ...;....._..... :...........................:........................;........._.............,............... aVE. rlEta/RUN � 16.96 ' 14.8i �'• � 1$.45 ' ' ....................�...,.............,,......�;....................,.�.....................:...............................o f...................�............................,; ..._.......o............,.............�..............,......_ :........................ ......,... AVE � FOR YEAR . Q3.96 . 43.53 .. . 48.43 _ . . - ,� � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO , December 9, 1987 . � TO: Mayor, City Council and City A��i. trator FROM: ; James E. Danielson � Public Works Director SUBJECT: The Ponds of Mendota Heights - Wetlands Permit ; Case No. 87-38 DISCUSSION• The Developer of The Ponds of Mendota Heights, Mr. Mike Kurtz,: visited the City Planner to discuss obtaining a wetlands permit for Lot 7, Block 1 of his subdivision. He had developed a site plan, using the plat�drawing and�showed a house location within 97± feet of the pond. Using this drawing�the encroachment, if there was any, would have been *3� and only at one small corner of the house. Staff told him that it was such a close call that we would not waste the City's time and his time and that we would give him the benefit of the doubt and not make him obtain a wetlands permit. } The builder who Mr. Kurtz sold the lot to, then obtained a certificate of survey from a different surveyor than from the one who did the plat and this new certificate showed the home within 84 feet of the pond (still with one small point of the home intersecting with a point of the pond). Staff feels that this now reduces the doubt to a point where a wetlands permit should be considered. The time of the year is to such a critical point for construction that we told the builder that we would not run his application through Planning Commission and City Council and delay his start until January (he told us he would have to back out of the deal if we did). ' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council in development waive the requirement for requirements for Planning Commission permit. ACTION. REQUIRED: the case of this minor a public hearing and the review and grant a wetlands If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion waiving the requirement for a public hearing and Planning Commission review and grant a permit to construct a home on Lot 7, Block 1, The Ponds of Mendota Heights according to the site plan submitted, dated 11-17-87. 1 SUR1iEYC3R'S CERTIFIGATE RELIAB�E NOMES � . �,, ., � t � ;,. r ! 1 r�'� s� r,� N . � ., � SCAIE� t IMGH=30 FEET ��so�'t� , s�F � P� N D •. ; � ` . + � N � '� � i . ' �M n i M �� N � ' , % , r / . '/ � �` � W %' W � /" � : i � .i J �+� � Ci jYY8.0 � r `2� O ( , N ,,�� ,,q'p1 � Q I-` ( � ::,. .;:33 � ... t*} s;. �`r' �[ s � -�- i ° ''.''� � B►r`� f �. �� `a80 �ffJ � `) , Z :� 1 � t��u oD � ", O¢�,N�p,G� a� ' Z L� r ; i �, PER _�� i_' _ ;1 � � � LQT ? � � � �� , � _ �, _�' d' +��o . r� �a i� ' . ' xsss.a �.� � • �-J 1 t� �t^ t 1 ' ' i saaa x �`�"� aae. 936.0} (936.O�saos I i sae,ix ,,e.o, x9a�,o `� Y�� r h.�21.0 �� y 26.0 '' 19.97" `I� i . ' o i � � � / M I � I M� i N PROP8SE0 M ' �..�� so � I1.0 � NOUSE /M � .. � � �Q r � "� a OAR. {3.I7N 10.84 �t I4.0 M d t �`� it.o ° (987.8 j ' �aa.�i _ c� 2i.33 so - - - - - • 18.22 -. ' ; o((sa = i937.8i � ae.s I `ase,t� .' 0 3, I 3 " 5 a) � �� W � m! � � O . � � � / . a � aae.:x �- 99.42 (V 0°20"40" W -• %�S7.D . f s3a.n aae.� oa�.o � d M M � S4UTH LANE � _ ,o _ �ames f�. Hi1l,�inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS ! SURtIEYORS 9A01 JAMES AVE. S. + BLOOMINQTON, MN. 55431 • 812-68d-3029 i i{ ' a �� ;y , . . . . . . �i+ , �:'• •` '! . Case No. a 7� 3 a �j.l Gf 4 1. 'r • ( �� '� .' ��, j; , j+' , C ITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � ' � & �E;�,!i;. DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA � ' , � . � �,;, s:.. ,�.. . , + °�v., . '�`' � �� + '� � APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION � ��'1+, � ' �� ( F' �, _. , OF t � � ' . � � � . _ . PLANNING REQUEST ,',, �5,�, ��f � � � j, ��f;, � � � - � Date of Applicatio �/-�.L l �� i �, k. .��'� ' � Fee Paid �-- ��' ,, ,.�� , Applicant � � //� , /� , , , , V l/�/► �� . � . � , • Name : � � � �� ;' ' , r 'j'°�' Last First � Initial _ � ;�,� . „ , , � ; �,.. . - � � � � d�7 l�� a,c.�-e 1MTr� (�'s l�t�t ,v s � � 1 S � ' ' Address: � � '� 1 .;��e�.:; �;�, i Number & Street City State Zip ,! , ..,.; ., , �• , , } :; } . �: � . � � Telephone Number: `� `a 3 �J�� U ', : .'.' Qwner . .. , � . . Name : l�.r � 2 � V��l l�.� , '' ' " ! ' Last First Initial S 1 1. ; i ' � , i `; Address: ,. ."�� Number & Street City State Zip . , , . � Street Location of Property in Question: � �aU� �a�s-e , � ��a, , Legai Description of Property: ,•� �Gyc 1'O J�c�t S��C N C� 0�� S r G�ofi "7 ��oG�' ( - v � Type of Request: :r �,, ` r . `, J; '' 1;1.'+�. eC�'(� ^7.� . � , � �,;, � ��.1,,�.: , ,, . , ;,; �,; ,, ;:;i a �,o lf:;.. .�? r �f�. �., c ii"` ,'�i �P. , � { � � j= 1 ��i�'� A � � , �� f i•^ `y � • {, ``'• Rezoni.ng ' Variance ' ' Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for�P.U.D. � Minor.Conditional Use Permit' � Subdivision Approval � � Plan Approval ' �(' Wetlands Permit � Other + �e &P n�"��Q �� l' t �_ �cM_� !� cc � �� V � �� ., p�CCErI � w� a. 0 (.�.�,Q AO� (��S � GU � f.�-� Wt-e d�t a� . �� , � � ; . � � t� '�v _ � \ � � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 11, 1987 / TO: Mayor, City Council and City in�a r FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Kladis lst Addition - Final PLat DISCUSSION: Council approved the preliminary plat for Kladis lst Addition at their September l, 1987 meeting. Mr. Kladis has now submitted the final plat for approval. RECOMMENDATION: ' Staff recommends approval of the Kladis lst Addition plat sub- ject to receipt of the $1,800 park fee. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 87- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR KLADIS 1ST ADDITION. CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS DAKCITA COt3NTY, MINNESO'i'A RESGILUTTON N0. 87- RES4I,UTIOi3 APPROVING FINAL Pi,AT FOR KI,ADIS 1ST ADDITTON WHEREAS, a final plat for Kladis lst Addition has been submi.tted to �he Council; and WHEREAS, the City Gouncil has reviewed said final plat, � NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendo�a Iieights, Minnesatar as fa3.lows; l. fihat the final plat af Kladis lst Additian submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved subject to the following condition: � a. Payment of Park Dedica�ion. 2. That the appropriate Ci.ty officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute �.he �inal plat on behalf af the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Counci7. of the City�of Mendata Heights this 1.5th day of December, 1987. , , CITY GOUNCIL t CITY C?F MENDOTA HETGHTS ' By Charles E. Merten�otta, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � i k KLADIS� .. ti 't' 7 B I.;IGK 1 r`,/;:RvREE i'. K�;�?L1.8 64 I z � � w a � , I �,; �, � . am � �. m ,Yi7 �0 ~�� $j� ♦ a" "�\ �' � � oOTRuyk �7� � t� � �0 kNr ♦�, � � \ �?��, Ja� r N� /*�� : • , Y�. r �ts �, ��, og?,.w � � � �..� Jr�� ,qsleRCr 8 � � ""'\ `I ��(r " ,� C�p i/*� f� i u 4.}� ��, Lo t r�� "�, I' �l r� �.. •:.��s� ' ,pr_'n r� t o M � �. `�`�.� - � $ i . ,� � ,� �! FI RST ADDITION, � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 11, 2987 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City C1erk SU&7ECT: Delinquent Sewer Billings DISCUSSION The attached resolutian asking to certify delinquent sewer accounts is forty-six names lang and totals nearl� $6,990. While the volume may seem very high, delinquency letters were sent an 130 utility accounts a manth ago; roughly 83 accounts have been made current and several of those still remaining on the list have cantacted us to promise payment be£ore certificati.on. Although the delinquency list ineludes all of the �"perennials," there are several accounts which have never been past due. We anticipate that perhaps as many as five of the accaunts will be c].eared, and if so, there wiJ.l be an amended version of the resalutian available on Tuesday. ACTION REQUIRED IE there are no amendments necessary, Council should � apprave the attached Resolutian Na. 8'7- "Resolution Certifying Dela.nquent Sanitary Sewer Rental Charges to the Dakota Caunty Auditor �ar Collection With Real Es�.ate Taxes.�t KMS:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, under the provisions of Ordinance No. 803 adopted by,the City Council of Mendota Heights on August 6, 1974, it is provided that if sewer rental charges due the City for the use of the City's sanitary sewer system are not paid within thirty (30) days after the mailing of a statement therefore, the same shall be collected and the collection thereof enforced in the same manner in�all respects as county and state real estate taxes subject to�like penalty, costs and interest charges, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that the total sewer rental charges due the City as of December 17, 1987, for sanitary, sewer service furnished the properties hereinafter described situated within the City have not been paid, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has further advised the City Council that a written statement for said sewer rental charges due the City as of December 17, 1987, has been sent to the last known owner of said properties and that more than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the mailing of said statement, and WHEREAS, said properties are all situated in the City,of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and the legal description of said properties,' the name and address of the last known owner thereof, and the total amount of sanitary sewer rental charges due for each of said parcels through December 17, 1987, are more particularly described as follows: Name and Address Judi Hanson 522 West Annapolis Bernard Abramson 688 Arcadia Drive Paul M. Esch 776 Bachelor Avenue Dean Fagen 1089 Bwana Court Legal Description 27-57500-030-01 27-37600-040-05 27-71102-060-03 27-44955-070-01 Total Amount $102.00 102.80 134.10 103.80 Robert J. Emery 1183 Dodd Road Carl Seivers 955 Douglas Road Bevan Marvy 970 Douglas Road Gec�rge Mikrut 1823 Faro Lane Gary Kopp � 1846 Faro Lane Mr. and Mrs. Zapata 536 Fremont Avenue Neil Baker 680 5outh F'reeway Road Thomas Sirek 1219 Highway 110 Gael Forsman 620 Ivy Falls Avenue James iiahn 1.132 Ivy Hill Drive Resident 1147 Ivy Hill Drive H. Sl.obof 1016 James Court Lewis Blustin 1685 Lilac Lane Paul Richtman 1670 Mayiiel.d Heights Raad Wm. Tumine�ly 1400 Medora Road . Eugene Engel.mann 1779 Overlook Lane Henry Abramowicz 1053 Overlook Road Roy Henderson 1495 Overlaok Road 27-03800-Q20-13 27-764Q0-071-02 27-7640Q-050-02 27-�4950-050-02 27-44950-110-p2 27-57500-110-Q2 27-38600-070-Q4 27-15600-012-04 2'7-13350-027-00 27-17850-530-00 27-17850-460-00 2'7-76402-190-03 z�-��aoo-�.aa-o2 2?-02300-484-52 27-37675-010-03 27-32800-040-02 27-32$00-080-01 2?-328Q0-410-01 136.50 62,80 135.60 loa.ao 264.60 102.00 102.00 394.04 2?9,20 229.00 54.00 258.40 161.80 54.00 a��..2a 254.Q1 341.40 215,20 � Jack Gohl 924 Rae Court Ramedo J. Saucedo 525 Simard Street Milton Nichols 1794 Summit Lane A.J. Mathe 1722 Sutton Lane Lee E. Hannah 1738 Sutton Lane Richard Dunst 645 Third Avenue N.T. Krebsbach 1832 Twin Circle Drive C. Lange 779 Upper Colonial Drive Jody Annestad 1824 Victoria Road Walter Bonfe 1875 Walsh Lane V. Christoffersen 800 Wentworth Avenue West Michael Coonan 2237 Apache Street Steven Baker 2163 Aztec Lane James Farnsworth 1090 Cullen Street Robert Reynolds 2305 Dodd Road I. Kanevsky 750 Keokuk Lane Leo Christianson 731 Mohican Lane Mrs. D. Anderson 751 Mohican Lane � 27-71275-180-02 27-31300-050-01 27-16500-010-01 27-71102-050-03 27-70900-030-03 27-69703-130-03 27-44955-160-01 27-17150-140-06 27-02600-020-05 27-8300-130-01 27-03800-060-36 27-27800-090-07 27-2800-110-04 27-19150-130-0 27-64600-140-02 27-27800-060-18 27-27800-300-22 27-27800-190-19 197.70 61.00 153.60 96.50 180.60 205.90 129.60 50.00 138.60 248.30 66.30 110.40 118.50 102.00 65.00 71.60 123.60 117.00 Terry O'Rourke 714 Pontiac Place Jerome Peterson 2Q56 Theresa Street . , John J. Liska 216fl Timmy Street William Ya3e 2165 Timmy Street Mark Sterling 810 Wagon Wheel Trail Gerald Neisan 894 Wagan Wheel Trail 27-27800-030-15 27-191Q0-220-03 2i-191.50-260-Od 27-45600-020--00 2'7-45300-150-00 1p7.31 a�$.sa 121.10 258.90 108.60 102.Q0 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Iieights, Minnesata as follows: t 1) That the total of said sanitary sewer rental charges set forth above is hereby adopted and confirmed as the praper unpaid sanitary sewer rental charges due far the above de�cribed properties through December 17, 1987, for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of Iand respectively, and the current charge against each such parcel of land shall be a lien cancurrent with general taxes upan suah parcels and all. thereof , 2) That the total amount af said sanitary sewer rental charges shall be payable with general taxes for the year 1987 collectible in 1988 (naw designated by Statute as real estate taxes payable in 1�88). 3) That the City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified copy of this resolution with t�he request that each of said amounts shall be extended upan the praper tax lists of the county to be thereafter collected in the manner provi.ded by law. 4) That a$25.00 service charge will be added to each delinquent sewer account in accordance with Ordinance Na. 157 amending Ordinance No. 803. � Adopted by the City Council of the Gity of Mendota Heights thi� ISth day of December, 1987. _ CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGiiTS By C ar es E. Mer ensa o Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson C�.ty Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCSL QN DECEMBER 25, 19$7 Excavatina License: Ralphs Plumbing & Heating General Con�ractors Licenses: Klemmensen Builders, Inc. McGaugh Construction Company, Inc. Sap2etal Construction Western Cedar/North Face 0 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 11, 1987 i TO: Mayor, City Council and ' yG��f�s'trator FROM:� Shirley Shannon, Accountant SUBJECT: December 15, 1987 List of Claims i Since this is the last meeting in 1987, I would like to include as many 1987 ex�enditures as possible in this report. Therefore, the claims list will be available in the add-on agenda on Tuesday evening. ; ; SS:madlr � � ; MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS December 9, 1987 To: � Mayor and City Council From:� Kevin Fra 1�C�y Administrator � J�� Re: � Comprehensive Land Use Designation on School Forest , Property I INTRODUCTION At th� meeting of November 19th, Council approved a Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation change for the portion of the School Forest property being sold by School District 197. At the meetinc� of December 1st, representatives of the District appeared to question Council action, and whether it had affected the value of the prope"rty. The matter is scheduled for further discussion this evening. . BACKGROUND The property in question (some 46+ acres) was previously shown'as School (S) and Low-Density Residential (LR). The underlying zoning is R-1, single-family homes on 15,000 sq. ft. lots, or whatever conditional uses may be allowed by the ordinance. A significant amount of the property, roughly 25� is wetlands. With the understanding the District no longer wished to hold the property for a school, and was in the process offering it for sale, Council voted on November 19th to change the designation to LR. However, Council also directed that some additional restrictive language be included: Councilmember Blesener moved to revise the Southeast Area Com�rehensive Plan Amendment to reflect a change designation of the School Forest site from Park to School and from School to LR and to provide language in the Comprehensive Plan amendment that allows onl single familv residential development without transfer of densitv - free-standina homes on 15�000 square foot lots without use of water in the calculation of density. Staff!prepared a Comprehensive Plan amendment incorporating all of the Southeast Area changes, and submitted it to the Metropolitan Council on November 24th. The subject property �. was labelled LR-Restricted, and the Comprehensive Plan 1 language regarding the praperty i� attached. In discussing the issue at the December 1st meeting, Council indicated that its intent is to a11ow only single-family homes an lots that each have at least 15,040 sq. ft. of land autside the water area. School District 197 has recently received bid� on the praperty, and is concerned as to whether the above , restrictian may have reduced the value af the land. They are also cancerned that they were not given prior notice that the City was contemplating this type of change. The high bidder on the land is Marvin Andersan homes, and� their offer is contingent on being able to plat 75 single family lots on th� praperty. City staff and Planner met with them on December 7th, to review the concept. The initial plan looked "tight" with many of the lats apparently having le�s than 15,000 s�. �t. above water. They have prepared a secand concept, wh�ch is attached for your infarmation. Anderson representatives indicated that they anticipate homes of a quality and value similar to Copperfield. The fundamental c�uestion seems to be whether, by incorporating thls special re5trictive language in the Comprehensive Plan, the School Forest property has been • treated diiferently from ather property in the City, or the awner has been deprived of some prapert� rights that it would otherwise en�o� under the R-1 zaning designatian. Answering this questian requires a loak at the City Cade, and at past precedent in ather developments. � CITY CODE PROVISIONS Section 7 af the Zoning Cade sets forth the requirements for an R-1 District, which is single-family homes on 15,000 sq. ft. m�nimum lots, pius set back restrictions. This section of the code is silent as to whether a portion of that required sqtxare footage can be wetlands. '• There are two sections of the Code that deal with density� transfer from water areas. The first is Sectian 7 0� � Ordinance 301, the Subdivision Ordinance (see at�ached). This provision allows far public dedication�of ' environmentally sensitive areas, and in exchange, allows for the transfer oi density from the dedicated area. The second relevant pravision is the PUD ordinance, Section 19 af the Zoning Code, Ordinance 401. While the PUD section of the' ordinance does not specifically reference wetlands, it grants general latitude to the Council and Planning Cammissian to allow variances from �trict application af zoning regulations, �or the purpose af promoting more pleasing develapments '"and to preserve the natural and scenic qualities for open areas." These two ordinance provisions 2 combined have been used by the City to allow water area density transfer, i.e. Somerset 19. I think the im�ortan��point to remember about both of these ordinance provisions is that they are discretionarv. In other�words, it is.up to the Council and Planning Cammi�sion ta decide whether it is in the public interest to apply them to a particular parcel a� property. They are na� a right o� entitlement to the property awner. . � In my`opinion, what Cauncil did on November 19th, in placing the restrictive language in �he Comprehensive Plan ior �he Schaol Forest site, was to make a determination t�up frant" that it•would not be appropriate to grant such a discretionary vara.ance from the �oning code for the subject property. ' 1 TREATMENT OF SIMTLAR PROPERTIES The questian has been raised as to whether we are treating the School. Farest property da.fferently than we �reated Copperfieldr iiampshire Estates, and Warrior.Pand, three recent developments that employed the PUD provision of the zoning ordinance.' , The Warriar Pond project had no lots with less than 15,000 sq. ft. a�' dry land. � The Capperfield development, Phases I, II, and III, had two of its approximately 185 lats with less than 15,000 sq. ft. o£ dry land; the smallest was 14,580. Averaae lot size in Copperfie3d was in excess o� 18r000 sg. ft. Hampshire Estates has four lots at less than 15,000 sq. ft. dry land; the smallest zs 14,0�0. Again, the averaae lot size in the entire develapment was in excess of 15,q00 sq. ft. AC2'ION REQUIRED To discuss with representatives of School District 197 and Marvin Anderson Homes implications and effects af the Council decision to p].ace this re�trictive language in the Comprehensive Plan amendment. 3 � Southeast AreaJ Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4 LR-II' Law Density Residential (2 units/�cre) The LR-It areas are intended far singie family homes at a relatively !ow density. This designatIon is between the existing LR Law Density Residential and RR Rural ResidentIal in intensity. , The developments shauld work with the natura! features of the land in : the placement of the lots and the homes should emphasize quality design and materlals. ' The overall de�sIty is gulded for two unitsJacre. The specific density � and develapment standards wi!! be outlined in the Zoning Ordinance, under the R-1C �istrict. . LR-Restricted Low Density Residentia! ,(2.32 units/acre) The LR-Restricted. areas �re intended for detached single family homes et standard city density. These areas serve as a buffer hetween existing single family neighborhoods to the narth and pianned mutti-family aress to the south. Development shouid work wlth the natural feaiures af the land snd the placement of the lots and the homes shoutd emphasize quality design and materials. The overall density is guided at 2.32 units per acre. . The ' specific density and de�elapment standards will be as outlined in the City's Zoning Urdinance under the R-1 distrtet. , DeveEapments In the �R-Restricted area shall nat be eligible for use or density trensfer variances under the City's PUD ordinance, ar for �use of water area in calculatian of allawable densitles. 0 � O O� 4 O O � I .. ; , _ _ � . ____1 _ � 4 � I c i• r / � W . � �----�------; � , : ; ! : .� ' , ' ` I f�t , , ; 1��.; MAZELG��', 1 � - --r; ; . :' ( � I �� J �. 1 ♦ • � /`. � � �� . � MENDOTA SHORES '\ ` ' ' ' ' ' ' � ` - 4.�_ �-- � i , � � \ i S'� ' - CO.NCE�T PLAN �� , � , ,. � 1 ,,., , _ --- - ; ��--� ---�---1--! --�---- �� ;�-- , � ;. �, . . , -f � ,. , • . , �.,� u. = -, :' � i -'�-._J �, � : � - -�; � �`,, �r,�,�. f. -. ; ---�---,- - ;----�� -� i ''i. —j-- ; , ,, ,� , f FAi�NQLY HtLLS �' � � � \ 74 �, j � � � � i � i � I � ` � � ' `%�• �VACATEID] ` i �? , �� i FpIENDL'f HILLS �iE-ARR � 1 � j ! � � r I � I_ I I I i -_ � INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 197 -� -,`_ �' ��'� _��`"�,��' .' .�� -� ��i �,. \ �`� / \ , • . � � �`,/ �� , s.'�j % .! :�Ur' � � �'=;' ; �= / =�{= �� ; �; '�-y � ��,`� /' � \ ♦ � F�r ,� `�- .�""� •� �i: .� � , y► �. %'�r ' �� =�:�i� � ♦ ��, � �� °•-. _ " I''' � ,>� � � ��I� 'll ��al: � ��r�� ` � � '�,j � �� ' a;� }��ii � �� % fi-� ' +�. .. �� ;•' � �s� i �! II �II � �/ �!• �. f �- � • • • • N � � ,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, r-1 ,� ,oa � OATE: DECEWEII 16. 1�/7 su�: r— �oo• nev: ar: /�!�'D�.11ii�D �+�+�'�9 �+9 �xJ� f SFCTION 7 DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TRANSFER As dediclti�n of stPep slopes, drainage ways, and wetlands may suhstintiall.y reduce the tota�. number of lots platted within a development, the City Council may cansider the transfer of deveiapment rights from that area which is to b�: dedicat�d, to an abutting developable area within the same pZai:. The Ci.ty Couneil,may consic3er the transfer of develc�pment rights when the £ollowin7 conditions exa.st: � I 7.1 The need for dedication o�' saic3 envirc?nmentally sa.gnificant physical featureG is greater. than can be accommodated throu�h the public (park and open space) dedicati.on requirements c�f this Ordinance. i 7.2 The area fram which the development r.ights havp been tr.ans�erred is permanently deed restric�ed to allow no development of. commercial, industri_a:E ar residentS.al structures, where the c�eed is helc� by an of£icially xecognized Homeowners Asso�iata.on. 7.3 The propnsed development must conform to the approX�riate parking restr:i.ctions as,outlined in the Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance. 7.4 Ti�e prapased development must conform to the estalalished pennitted or conditional uses of the appropriate zoning district for which the pro�er�.y is so �esi.gnated. . r�.., � �� MEMO , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS , December 11, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin FrazJ' `�y Administrator Re: ,Case No. 87-24, Centex Homes, Kensington Planned Unit � Development INTRODUCTION At the meeting of December 1st, Council-opened the public hearing on the application of Centex Homes for sketch plan approval, rezoning, conditional use permit for Planned Unit Development, and preliminary plat on their proposed development of 500 multi-family units in Southeast Mendota Heights. However, Council declined to take action because Metropolitan Council approval to implement the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan amendment had not yet been received. The hearing was continued to 8:00 p.m. December 15th. Metro�olitan Council approval has now been received, and Council can proceed to take the remaining actions necessary to implement the Kensington plan. A new issue of metropolitan significance review has arisen during the past week, and is discussed below. Also discussed are the attached implementing documents which have been prepared by City staff and legal counsel. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL APPROVAL Attached is the letter from Metropolitan Council Chair Steve Keefe�notifying the City that the Southeast Area plan amendment has been determined to have no potential impact upon a regional system plan, and that we may place the amendment into effect. Hallelujah!! � � A more complete staff report discussing the details of this finding is being presented to the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, and the full Metropolitan Council next Thursday. We should receive a copy of that report in Monday's mail, and I will provide a copy at the meeting Tuesday evening. I understand that the only "red flag" raised is to encourage us to work with Eagan in monitoring the capacity of the Dodd/494 interchange. The aviation staff plans to strongly commend us for our efforts to promote land uses and restrictions that address the aircraft noise issue. 1 METROPOLITAN S�GNIFICANCE REVTEW Last Monday evenin�, the Sunfish Lake City Council passed a resalutian requestZng that the Metropolitan Council conduat a metropolitan s�gni�icance review af the develapment plan. A copy o� the resolution is attached. , Metropolitan significance is a proces� far raising issue��of impact on regional system� �i.e, airparts, freeways, sewers, etc.), or an land uses in communities other than the situs local government. It is a rather detailed and somewhat � legalistic procedure that potentially invo3ves public , hearings, the introduction of evidence, etc. The practical effect of a full-blown significance revlew is a 90-day suspension of site alteration during the review, and at worst a pro�ect suspension of up to one year to resolve the � negative impacts. The Metrapalitan Council has never invaked the one year suspensian provision, even an projects as large as the Mall of America. Ratherr the Cauncil usually prefers to operate in a mediator role. ; The Sunfish Lake resolution raises two patential impacts af metropolitan significance as defined in �he rules and regula�ians. The first, referred to on page 2 as MC �A4 ' concerns traf�ic impacts on a regional system. The �� Metropolitan Council has already addressed regional �ystem impacts in its review of'our Comprehensive Plan amendment,' and found no impact. Therefore, this issue cannat be raised anew under the metropolitan significance process. ; The second assertion raised in the resolution, and referenced to 8ectian MC 2B, concerns the general belief that our Plan amendment and development project will create pressures to rezone land in Sunfish Laker as well as affect..property values and the quality of life in that cammunity. The Metropolitan Council staf�'s reaction to this assertion is that it is awfully vague and nebulaus, and would not, in ; it�elf, likely lead to the initiation of the significance. review prooess. ' Nothwithstanding a11 of.the above, the Council staff has ; also determined that the 5unfish Lake resolu�ion is an � incomplete submission; in that the assertions are not adequa�ely backed u� with substantiating evidence. � Therefare, they believe the Chair will decline to initiate the review procesS. They did indicate that he will likely offer to host a meeting af the two mayars ta discuss the issue. If, after that meeting, Sunfish Lake wished to pursue its request for signficance review, it wauld have to submit the required substantiating �vidence. At this point in time, the application for signiiicance review by Sunfish Lake does not in any way preclude Council fram proceeding ta act on the planning application before it. E IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS The Kensington project is our first experience to rezone land under the new, special PUD procedures which were incorporated into the zoning Qrdinance by Council on December 1st. Staff and legal counsel have prepared a series of documents (attached), which will have the effect of implementing both the overall concept approval for the whole 500 unit Kensington project (Plan B), as well as accomplish rezoning and platting for Phase I, consisting of 136 units. Among other issues, the documents address the sale of the land to the City for the community recreation complex for an agreed upon sum of $750,000. The documents are as follows: � • 1. A'resolution giving sketch plan approval for the entire Kensington PUD pro�ect. This resolution sets forth the findings required in the new ordinance for approving this type of development. It also references and adopts an attached develo�er's agreement, covering issues germane to the entire PUD, including park dedication and sale of park property to the City., • 2. Two ordinances rezoning the propertx for Phase I from R-1 to HR-PUD and MR-PUD, consistent with the land use designations in the Comprehensive Plan. Council adoption of these ordinances should be contingent upon execution of the developer's agreement discussed below as No. 3. 3. A developer's agreement setting forth the detailed agreements between the City and the developer for Phase I. This agreement provides for developer construction of the �ublic improvements (as has been done in Copperfield and Hampshire Estates), along with addressing other issues of general and usual concern to the City. 4. A resolution approving a conditional use permit for a Planned Unit Development for Phase I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The public comment period for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) does not close until December 30, 1987. The Metropolitan Council has indicated that it will not have any substantive comments. However, Council will need to make all other actions on this item this evening contingent on a finding of negative declaration for an Environmental Impact Statement, and reserving the right to incorporate mitigation measures that arise as a result of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet review. 3 ACTTON REQUIRED Council should reopen the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. aMd receive any public camments afiered. If, after that hearing, Cauncil wishes ta praceed with the Kensington Sketch Plan and Phase I approvals it should take the following actians: 1. Pass a motion indicating that all following aations on the Centex Homes, Kensington multi-family residential project are cantingent an a finding af negative declaratian for an Environmental Impact Statement, and on reserving the right to incorporate mi�i�ation measures that arise as a result of the Environmentai Assessment Worksheet review. 2. Pass a mation adopting Resolution 87-1��, A RESOLUTION GIVING SKETCH PLAN APPROVAL TO CASE 87-24, KENSINGTON MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTTAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. 3. Pass motions adapting ordinances No, 246 and 246, Ordinances Amending Ordinance No. 401. 4. Pass a motion adopting Resolution 87-12ji, A RESOLUTION APPR4VING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FQR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CASE 87-24, KENSINGTON PHASE I. 5. Pass a motion adapting the developer's agreement between the City of Mendota Heights and Centex Homes, Inc. for construction af Kensington Plannsd Unit Develapmentf Phase I. 6. Pass a motion approving the preliminary plat for Case 87-24, Kensingtan Planned Unit Development, Phase I. 4 ?�'trv crrt� Deeemb�r i0, 1987 Kevin F'razell, Administrator Gity of` Nlendata Heights 750 S. Pla2a Dr. Menda�a Fieights, MN 55i20 RE: Ci.ty of Mer�dota Hei�hts ' Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Southeast Area Plan i Metrapolitan Counei2 Distrie� 'f5 Metropolitan Couneil Reierral No. 11666-9 Dear Mr. Frazell: Metropolitan Council 30Q Metro Square Buiiding Seventh and Roberf Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephane (b12) 291-f,359 The Metropolitan Council ataff has reviewed Mendota Heightst proposed comprehensive plan amendment received by the Council on November 2�, 19$7. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no gotential impaet upon any of the metropalitan system plans. The city may place the amendment into effeet at any t3.me . , . Cauneil staff has alsa eomp].eted a review af the apparent consisteney af the praposed amendment with ather adopted chapters of tlae Metropol3.tan Develop�nent Guide and will farward its comments under separate caver. The Metrapalitan and Cammunity Develo�ent Committee wi1.I consider these eomments at its meeting on December 17, 1987. ' If you have any questions� please con�aet Barbara Sennessa Council staff� at 291-6�i19, wha is the prineiga2 reviewer for this amendmerzt. SineerelY, s�� Steve Keefe Chair SK:ms Enclosure ce: Mary Martin, Metropolitan Council District No. 15 John Rutfard, Metropolitan Couneil StafF Harbara Senness� Metropo],itan Council Staff An Ec�ual Opf�oriunity Empioyer � MEl'R4POLI�AN COUNCIL ` DEC 0 f' 1�87 � RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE CHAIRPdAN'S dFFIC� REQUESTING METROPOlITAN SIGNIF'ICANCE REVIEW WHEREAS: OF ANTIGiPATED IMPACTS OF TNE PROPOSED CHANGES IN TNE COMPRENENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF MENqOTA NEIGNTS A. The City af Mendota Neights has proposed to amend its Comprehensive Plan so as to change permitted uses in a large partion of the Sautheast area of Mendata�Heights immediately adjacent to the City of Sunfish Lake frQm low-density, single-family housing to medium-density and high-density, muiti-family housing; B. A developer has presented a plan now under consideration by the City of Mendata Heights to build hi4h-densitv, multi-family units in both the areas prapased by Mendata Heights ta be medium- density and high-density, multi-family housing areas; and . C. It is believed that the prapased Comprehensiva Flan Amendments will have adverse impacts an land use in the City af : � Sur►fish Lake, a11 as more fully set forth herein.� fal l ows : NOW THEREFORE BE Ii' RESOLVED by ihe City of Sunfish Lake as l. In accordance with MC 5 of the Rules��and ReQulations for the Review af Matters All��ed to be af Metrovolitan Si�nificance of the Metropolitan Cauncil, (hereinafter the "Rules and Regulations"), this Council hereby adapts this Resolution requesting the Metrapalitan Council to undertake a Metropolitan Significance Review af the proposed Comprehensive Pian Amendments by the city of Mendota Heights. 1 2. In compliance with MC 5B of the Rules and Regulations, this Cauncil advises as follows: a. The name and address of the initiator of this metropolitan significance review request is the City of Sunfish �ake, Minnesota whose mailing address is: cjo the Honorable Duncan H. Baird, 2144 Charlton Raad, Si. Paul, Minnesota 551i8.' b. A descriptian of the proposed Comprehensive Pian Amendments is contained in an EAW and in a City of Mendota Heights request for Approval of said Comprehensive Plan � Amendments, both af which are already in the possession of the Metropolitan Council. c. This Council alleges th.at ihose standards contained in MC 2, which it believes to be of inetrapolitan significance are thase set farth in MC 2A4, and MC 28. The Council does not believe that the exemptions described in MC 3 and 4 do appiy�in this case. ' 3. In compliance with MC 5B4 af the Rules and Regulations ihis Cauncil hereby finds that the metropolitan systems effects, among others, of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are as'fallaws: a, The iand in Sunfish Lake adjacent to the site is all residentially zoned and if the Comprehensive Plan Amendments are approved and implemented by the Gi�y of Mendata Heights there will be pressure to re-zone and revise the Sunfish Lake Comprehensive Plan and zaning ardinances in ways which the Council finds are detrimentai ta the health, E , fi safety and we�fare of the city of Sunfish Lake and its residents. b. Such praposed Camprehensive Plan changes will adversely affect the value of property in Sunfish Lake and adverseiy affect the quality of life of those residents af the city who already have dwellings proximate to the area. c. Based upan ihe fioregoing the City Cauncii af the City af Sunfish Lake hereby requests that a Metropalitan 5ignificance Review be initiated and to facilitate that action this resaluiion is hereby adopted. Adopted the seventh day of December, 1987. K? CITY QF UNFISN LAKE _ By vu.1 �. / l,� Its Mayor ` S CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHT5 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 87-1�0 RESOLUTION GIVING SKETCH PLAN APPROVAL TO CASE NO. 87-24 KENSINGTON MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Whereas, Centex Homes,jInc. has proposed a planned unit development multifamily housing project of 500 units in the southeast area of the City of Mendota Heights; and i Whereas, the Planning Commission has reviewd said proposal, and recommended its adoption by the City Council; and � Whereas, the City Council makes the following findings with regard to the proposal: ' 1. The proposal is consistent with the goals, intent, ' and purposes of Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the commun ity : . a) To provide a diversity of housing types within the multifamily residential areas of the Southeast Area. b) To encourage development which will be sensitive to the natural beauty and terrain of the Southeast Area. c) To encourage development at an appropriate scale for the area. , d) To encourage development which provides the opportunity for property ownership by its residents, this being recognized as beneficial to the community as a whole. 2. The proposal is consistent with the goals, intent, purposes, and planned unit development provisions of the City's zoning ordinance: a) The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive • Plan of the community. � � b) The prapasal is an ef�ective and unified . treatment of the development possibilities on the project site and the develapment plan provisions for the preservation of unique natural amenities. c) The project can be planned and developed to harmonize with any existing and proposed development in the areas surrounding the project site. d) The project has density in acaardance with the City's comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o� the City ai Mendota Heights, that Case 87-24, Centex Homes Inc. praposal for the Kensington planned unit development is : hereby given sketch plan concept approval as shown an drawings dated , and subjeat ta the execution of the developers agreement attached and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the developer's agreement attached hereto, and entitled � is hereby appraved and authorized for execution by the Mayor and City Administrator, . • Adapted by the City Cauncil of the City af Mendota Heights this 15th day of December, 1987. CITY COUNCIL . CITY OF MEND4TA HEiGHTS � By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: � Kathleen M. Swansan City C1erk � CITY �F MENDOTA HEIGNTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEV LO T T L ENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of December, 1987, by and between the Gity af Mendata Heighis, Dakota County, Minnesota ( hereinafter cal led the "City" ) and Centex Homes, ( nc. , c jo Tandem Carparatian, 6440 Flying Ciaud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (hereinafter caiied the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City fior Planned Unit Devefopment Concept approval for approximately one hundred two (102} acres, lacated north of Interstate Highway 494, east of the Interstate Highway 494 Interchange at Dodd Road; south of Mendota Neights Road and west of Delaware Avenue, situated in Dakota County, State of Minnesata, and more� fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereihafter calied the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Developer proposes ta develop and maintain on the Property a planned development consisting of five hundred (500) residential units and approximately forty {40) acres of park land and recreational facilities in accordance with the illustration shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof {hereinafter caifed the "Kensington Planned Unit Development"); WHEREAS, the Kensington Planned Unit Develapment was reviewed and approved, subject to certain canditions, by the City Planning Commission on November 24, 1987; WHEREAS, the Deveioper has agreed to fuily camply with and conform the Kensington Planned Unit Development to the conditions specified herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, in cansideration af the City approving the sketch plan for the Kensingtan Planned Unit Oeveiopment, 1. Sketch Plan Approval: The City agrees to grant sketch plan approval in accordance with City Zoning ardinance 401 for Plan B of the Kensington Planned Unit Development as iliustrated in Exhibit B(hereinafter ca4led #he "5ketch Pian B"}; notwithsianding #he foregoing to the contrary, approval of Sketch Plan B shall be conditioned upon purchase of the "Community Park" (as hereinafter defined) by the City as hereinafter set fort.h. Developer hereby acknowledges that, upon failure of such condition, such approvai shall lapse and be af no further farce and effect. 2. Phaseci Deve{opment: Subject to the conditians set forth herein, Developer shall develop the Kensington Pianned Unit Develapment on a phased basis, in generai conformance with Sketch Plan B, each phase being subJect to preliminary and final plat approvai by the City in accardance with appiicable ordinances. Fhase 1 of the Kensington Planned Unit Development is outiined in red on Exhibit B. The remaining portion of the Praper-ty shall be developed, at Developer's discretian, as one or mare separate phases. Q'� 3. Campiiance with Qrdinances: The Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and City Subdivision Ordinance and other appiicabie City cades and ordinances affecting the develapment af ihe Property. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the preliminary and fina! plat approvals are contingent upon, arnong ather things, each preceding phase af the Kensington Planned Unit Development being in compliance with ai) applicabie City ordinances and City code requirements. Q. Area Specia! Assessmer�t: Developer agress to accept an Area Speciai Assessment far Developer's share of the cost af constructian af Mendata Neights Road and related 'rmpravements thereto, inc{uding, but not limited to, paving, curb and g�tter, sidewalks, trunk water main and storm sewer, The cost of construction of Mendota He'rghts Raad and related improvements shall be determined by the procedures and standards of City codes, ordinances and staie law. 5. Purchase af Cammunity Park Property. Subject to the conditions set forth herein, the Oeveloper agrees to sell, transfer and convey to the City gaod and marketable fee simpie title to that area designated as P-1 Park - Community Recreation {hereinafter called "Community Park") on Exhibit B for Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Doliars and OOj100 {$750,000.00) in accordance with the purchase agreement attached hereta and made a part hereof as Exhibit C (hereinafter called the "Park Purchase Agreement"). Unless waived in writing by the City, Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City's abligatian to purchase the Community Park is cantingent upon the passage of a Band Referendum by the citizens of Mendota Heights on or before June 30, 1988, for -3- acquisition and development of the Community Park. Notwithstanding the above, City reserves the right to tender payment for the Community Park on or before September 1, 1988. In addition, Developer agrees to grade the Community Park at its cost in accordance with grading plans approved by the City. 6. Neighborhood Park Dedication: Developer agrees to dedicate, transfer and convey to the City, without cost to the City, that area designated as P-3 Park-Neighborhood Recreation on Exhibit B (hereinafter called the "Neighborhood Park") upon (i) the sale of Community Park from the Developer to the City, or (ii) if the City does not tender to the Developer the purchase price for the Community Park on or before September 1, 1988, then upon final plat .approval by the City of Phase II of the Kensington Planned Unit Development. Notwithstanding the above, should the Developer fail to receive approval of a final plat for Phase II within eighteen .(18) months of the date of this Agreement, Developer agrees to either: (i) dedicate an amount of land for park and recreational purposes consistent with the City Subdivision Ordinance, based on the total acreage of Phase I of Kensington Planned Unit Development at a location mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the City, or (ii) if the Developer and the City cannot mutually agree upon the location of such dedicated park land within days after the expiration of said 18-month period, the Developer shall immediately pay to the City the cash equivalent park contribution, consistent with the City Subdivision Ordinance. - -4- 0 0 7. Title ta Park Property: Priar to the dedication, sale, trar�sfer or canveyance of any real propsrty or interest therein by th� Developer ta the City as pravided herein, the Developer shaii deiiver to the City an opinion addressed to the City by an attarney, and in the form acceptable ta the Cityr as to the candition of the title of such property, or, in (ieu af a title opinion, a tit(e insurance policy insuring interest therein and the condition of the title of any real property ar any interest therein to be dedicated, sold, transferred ar eanveyed as majr be pravided herein by the Developer to the City shall vest in the City good and marketabie title therean, free and clear af any mortgages, fiens, encumbrances or assessments. 8. Plan A Alternative: Developer and City mutually agree that should the City fail to purchase the Cammunity Park pursuant to the Park Purchase Agreement, the City shaU consider in good faith and in a timely manner consider the sketch plan for that alternative Pianned Unit Developmenfi referred ta as Plan A(hereinafter called "Sketch Plan A"), which is iilustrated and mare fully described on Exhibit D attached hereto ar�d made a part hereof. Notwithstanding the above, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that as of the date hereof the City's Comprehensive Land llse Pian designates a partion of the land submitted for development pursuant to Sketch Plan A as "PARK." Any sketch plan approval of Sketch Plan A by the City shall be conditioned upon, in addition to preiiminary snd fina! plat approval, amendment of the City's Camprehensive l�and Use Plan and rezoning of the subject praperty to compiy therewith, in the City's discretion. �� 9. Binding Effect af Agreement: The Developer acknowledges and agrees that upan entering this Agreement, the City in no way waives its right of approvai, both preliminary and final, of the materials and submissions required herein, including, but nat iimited to the preliminary and final plat af .any phase of the Kensington Planned Unit Development and the City expressly reserves its right to deny approval of any pians, the plat and any building permits shouid the Develaper fail ta proceed in accordance with this Agreement and/or fa's) to perform in totai compliance with the obiigations herein. 1C?. Miscellaneous: A. The Develaper acknowledges that the rights of the City to performance of the obligations of the Develaper contempiated� by and specif'red within this Agreement are special, unique, and of extraordinary , character, and that, in the event that the Devalaper vialates, � fails, or refusa to perform any covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy of (aw. The Develaper agrees, therefore, that in the event it via{ates, fails or refuses to perform any � covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may, at its aption, institute anc{ prosecute an action to specifically en�force perfiormance of such covenant. No remedy referred in this Agreement is inten'ded ta be exciusive and shaii be cumulative and shall be in addition ta every other ; remedy. The electian of any one ar more remedies sha{f not canstitute a waiver of any other remedy. . J . B. Any term of this Agreement that is illegaf or unenforceable at law or in equity shall be deemed to be void and of na force and ef#ect to the extent necessary to bring such term within the provisions of any such � r. appiicabie iaw or laws, and such terms are sa modified in the balance of the terms of this Agreeme�t shall be enforceabie. C. Provisions of this Agreement shaii be binding upan and enforceable against the Developer, its successors, and its assigns af the Property herein described. D. The Developer shall pravide written notice to the City of the name and address of potentiai purchaser, assignee, successor or transferee thirty (30) days prior to any saie, conveyance or transfer of the Property. E. The Developer agrees that Develaper shall reimburse the City immediately upan demand for any and all City administrative time and labor, costs ofi consult'rng engineering services, casts of lega! services and ather 4t1t-0�-�OC�C@!" expenses incurred by the City arising out of or in cor�nection with this Agreement ar the enforcement thereof. IN WITNE�S WHEREOF, Reveloper and the City have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date and year first above written. SIGNATURES FOR DEVELOPER S{GNATURES FOR THE ClTY OF MEND�TA HE(GHTS By Its N{ayor Attest its ity er �� `v'i"�-: �. � G�� Hfgh Deruity �8.fi5 Acrcs 'b�� ry J3.6p Acras 62.25 Acres F'a� �0.00 Acres TaLaI 142,25 Acros �� +�j � � � � �_ ` --' --_.....�.� / '�/ ('''� .�'� I � ��-«�c ,%r , } � ,,/ P 3 PARK - Neigt�bnnc�wd ��y , j S a �.3, �4+'�Slp RacreaLEme � � �"A !� � �..� J ir� _��.C�% '�1. i! .�./' �!/� � � � � � �� i t � � O .--�.---. � O� � , ,�, � � ST7'E A � � HigA Dena{ �136 tlntis, 22.1 Acr+at � &•l�„UnitslAcre � �/�-� i.,r�� „' e`�I ..�''�:.-r' �pW �j / S7TE C V i / High Lk� '"� $8 U�+its, � 5 Acns f\ I1.7 UniislAcr� w ►,.. }�% srJE D High p��, 4� �ni�, 3.5 /3.7 Units/Ac .... . � �„�,,..��. •--�--�..�.-r�,.�,� -�.l �� -'� /r � 4„r/�► ! �� a� �% � s't �� "' S77'E E �il � 1,S1+uDrrtsi,ty re! M �,, a--- � - -- ��-^-,. �----��. SlTE B � t _p�n:�c ;.:; ;' P 1 P�IRK Commae�ity liec+�e:atiae $'Ah Laartttty , � �.s�c�'(;;�; ' w:l:_ 24.6 Aores::,,� „� �.+e ':`^ '., t 1 :�. S. untts, ! A C+ t C s � -'.•:: � �n�. t` ar*�' . Y Units/Ac+t w'.�.��';��{ �� ; �ca�l�f� �;•' t�.t � ..`:�;�.� ' r . M�,��` ' r. �a� '��*��,� r . f�� . �rr.� � � ','e' ^-: +'!'�,`•. """+.rrr,��an.% �'`-` � . • .X.'i�rt� . ' s. �►-ta. - � ` `J t\ �\, �� 1� (; S7TE F �i � ) /"'��`-��"""�i �� f. 1 Htgh � '� �� ...:. �IN 94 Unt�� SS Acr+es � �� y.p_f� . �+--., '!1 l s•� tlnitSlAcre j "-�•�E � .. �,/ •r•,��y�a, `��, ",Si7'E" ' C - ` `' _� ," �-- � `Y ��dwm D+artsiLy ++r� � 65 UrtiLs, 13.8 Acr+e� 4.8 ilnfts/Acne � , P S PARK - Lalcrahox ��/ � ��''�,/ � ��•--"^^��.�+� � s.�q Acres Tntal ' �� y� !! (4.4 acre pondl ��t,,�i � ~� /I ( � �- l ? � � i � �- � �-�•,� �'',.�,,,,�( �,.�. � i � w. �„ i ` ""..r...a..�.�vi�.iaw�w�w�.w�r'��• - �-- ---- . ... - :�.._ ._..,..�-_�.."`�'�" . _ - _ •• • ----� �. . _ . . - - �- - -- --� , � �� , i`•. '� : \�► ,.`�.��`; . � •� �i•. . i •'� , ;,1.�. ^��,�: Y , . �-.r�^' � • � '• �. � �i .. . � ^ ••Il�•��'~ �.� , O • . � '�'• .; �' ' \ ,� 1' ��+ � • � � � : , � �.. �� : s � �r�"",-- -_111�� .- �- �y . . , . . � r �j � i : • i /�7i�c I ; �. ( ; i •. � . " 4 //•��. 7 �i•IiI�\�\1 �,/. '� ��.. �F•�.::3.F_-_ - -.t,,,.:+�:'.�.::1a d w:«a. +►�,►��'-::.�..�.. - .-.�+i+�::cz.�r�'-. 1 q—�—�—eer.�r� .w t , _� � .� _, � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVEL�PER'S AGREEMENT FOR A P�AhlNED UNiT �DEVEL G MENT Kensington Development: Case No. 87-24 THlS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of December, 1987, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota (hereinafter called the "City"'} and Centex Nomes, 4r�c., e/o Tandem Corparation, 6440 F{ying Cioud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (hereinafter called the "Develaper"). W I T N E S S E T N: WNERfA5, the Developer has applied ta the City for (i) Zone District Changes fram One Family Residential (R-1) to High Density Residential - Planned Unit Development (NR-PUD) and Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development (MR-PUD) and (ii} piannec{ Unit Development Concept Approval for approximately one hundred two (102 +) acres, located narth of Interstate Nighway 494, east of the Interstate Highway 494 Interchange at Dodd Road; south of Mendata Heights Raad and west of Delaware Avenue, situated in Dakata County, State af Minnesata, and more fully described in Exhibit A aitached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter called the "Property"); _ WHEREAS, the Deveiaper proposes to develop on the Praperty a plar-�ned development consisting af a five hundred (5(?0} r�esidential unit anc! appraximately forty {44 +} acres af park land and recreationa) facilities in accordance with the illustratian shown on Exhibit B, attached hereta and made , a part hereof {hereinafter cailed the "Kensingtan Planned Unit Development"); WNEREAS, the Developer has appiied to the City for prsliminary plat approval of Phase I of the Kensington Planned Unit Development; WNEREAS, Phase I shall consist of one hundred thirty-s,ix (136) residential units on approximately twenfiy-twa (22 +) acres located on the west end of the Praperty and be developed in accordance with the iilustration shawn on Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereafter called "Phase 1") WHEREAS, Phase 1 was reviewed and approved, subject to certain conditians, by tne City Planning Commission on November 24, 1987; WHEREAS, Phase 1 was.. reviewed and appraved, subject to certain conditions, by the Ci#y Council on Qecember 15, 1987; WMEREAS, the Developer has agreed that Phase 1 shall fully camply with and conform to the conditions specified herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adap#ing Ordinance Nos. 246- 247, Ordinance amending the City Zoning Districts; and Reso{ution 87-121, Resolution approving conditionai use permit far Phase 1 of Kensingtan Planned Unit Deve{opment, the Developer covenants and agrees to develop and maintain the Property, subject to the foliowing conditians: � Preiiminar� Piat Approvai: 1, The Qeveloper shall develop and maintain Phase 1 in conformance with the Development plan received, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 15, 1988, anci attached hereto and made a part hereaf as Exhibit D, st�bject ta such changes and modifications provided herein. The Developer shall f10t LI�Y�I0�7 j construct upan or maintain Phase 1 in any other respect or manner than pravided herein. 2. Develaper acknowiedges that pUrsuant ta the City's Zoning Qrdinance, canstruction af Phase 1 must commence within one (1) year fram the date of approval; unless the City Council, at its sole discretion extends the construction period for an additional one (1) year. 3. The Developer agrees that it sha!! submit to the City for approval a written schedule indicating the progress schedule and arder of completion af the Phase 1. 4. Prior to the release of a fine) plat, the Developer shall submit to the Gity for appraval five (5) copies af a development plan (1"=100' scele) showing any existing and proposed contours, proposed streeis, and lot arrangements and size, minimal flaor elevations of each lot, preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, v+ratermain, and storm sewer, 1IX?-year flood plain contours, panding areas, tributaries to catch basins, arrows showing dii•ection of storm water flow on all lots, location af walk, trails, and any property to be deeded, solci, conveyed or transferred to the City. Said plans are hereby made a part af this Agx•eement. -3- 5. Priar to the release of a final plat, the Developer shall submit ta the City for approval, final pians for ali sanitary sewer, watermain, and starm sewer faciiities, drainage facilities, concrete curb, gutters, sidewalks, streets, and other miscellaneous work (hereinafter called "improvements") to be made and constructed on or within the property ta be dedicated to the City. Said plans are hereby made a part of this Agreement. Developer further agrees • that all lmprovements shall be designed by a registered professionai engineer in compliance w'rth City, State and Federal siandards. The City reserves the exclusive right to apprave ar request modifications to the improvements. All such fmpravements shaii be campleted by the Deveioper and shaii be free and ciear of any (ien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including any for work, labor or services rendered in connection therewith, materials or equipment supplied therefore, on or before the later of two (2} years fram the date hereof. 11�74h completion and acceptance, the Qeveloper warrants and guarantees that the Improvements will be free from any defects of materials or workmanship far a period of two (2) years fa}iowing said completian and accepiance. In the event any defect in materials o# workmanship within said two year period, warranty ar guarantee shall be a period of three (3} years foiiowing said campietian and acceptance. Defects and materiais of workmanship shal! be determinsd by the City. f 6. Prior ta the release of a final pEat, the Developer shal) submit to the City far approval, final plans for grading, drainage and (andscaping (hereinafter called "l.andscaping improvements"} of Phase 1. Said pfans are hereby made a part of this Agreement. Developer further agrees that all Landscaping Improvements shall be designed by a registered prafessionai engineer in compliance with City standards. The City reserves the exclusive right to Z� ,� approve or request modifications to the Landscaping Improvements. Ail such l,andscaping Improvements sha11 be completed by the peveloper and shali be free and clear pf any lien, ciaim, charge or encumbrance, including any for wark, labor or services �rendered in connection therewith, materials or equipment supplied therefore, on or before the fater of two (2) years from the date hereof. Upon completion and acceptance, the Developer warrants and guarantees that the Landscaping Improvements against any defects of materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years foliawing said comp4etian and acceptance. In the event any defect in materials of workmanship within said two year period, warranty or guarantee shail be a period of three (3} years following said completion and acceptance. Defects and materials of warkmanship shal! be determined by the City. Development of Phase 1: 7. Developer agrees that, anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, the City of Mendota Heights City Council and its agents or employees shaii not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Deveioper, the Developer's contractors or subcontractars, materiaimen, iaborers or to any ather persan ar persons whomsaever, for any claim, demand, damagesJ actions or causes af action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this Agreement or the performance and compietion of the work and the improvements provided herein. The Developsr will indemnify and save the City harmless from all such claims, demands, damages, actions or causes af actions or the cost af disbursement, and expenses of defending the same, specifically ineluding, without intending to limit the categories of said costs, cost and expenses for City administrative time ar�d labor, costs af consulting , -5- engineering services and casts af legai services rendered in connection with defending such claims as may be brought against the City. In addition, the '� Developer shali aiso reimburse the City immediately upon ciemand for any and aii City administrative time and labar costs of consulting engineering services, costs of lega! services and other out of pocket expenses incurred by the City arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. $. Unti! acceptance by the Gity of any such deed of conveyance of any improvements, the Developer shall be sale4y responsibie far all maintenance and repa'sr of the streets and other public improvements constructed hereunder. The City shal! be respansible for all maintenance and repair after acceptance of seid deed(s) of canveyance. Priar to conveyence of the public improvements to the City, the Developer shall cause warning signs to be placed on and around such streets and ather improvement whenever any dangerous ar hazardous condition exists an such property and shall establish any rtecessary detour routes. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shail be barricaded and cbsed. in the event residences are accupied prior ta completing s#reets, the Develaper shal! maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and withaut the subdivision swept clean o# dirt and debris that may spill or wash onto the street from his operation. If the streets are black-topped, the Developer may request, in writing, that the City k�ep the streeis open during the winter manths by plowing snow from said stree#s priar fio fina! acceptance of said streets. The Developer shali save the City harmiess from any and all damages or injury, whether to person or property, caused by or relating to the snow plowing operations provided by the City prior to conveyance of titie to the pubiic improvements by the � Deve{aper ta the City. The pravision by the City of snow plowing service does not in any way constitute final acceptance af the public,improvements. 9. The Deveioper covenants, warrants and agrees tF�at ail labor and work sha11 be �done and performed in the best and mast workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the p#ans and specifications approved by the City. Na construction shall begin until final plans and final plat are approved by the City. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications shall be permitted unless approved in writing by the City. . 10. The City sha!! not issue any building permit for the construction of any building, structure, or improvement, on or in Phas� 1 until all conditions of this Agreement have been satisfactorily addressed by the Developer and the Phase 1 has been inspected and accepted by .the City. ' Conditions: 11. The Developer agrees ta construct ai) sidewalks in Phase 1 to a width of five feet (5'). 12. The Developer agrees that in addition to providing one (1} garage per residential unit, Developer shaii pravide proo# of the availability, ta the City's sole satisfaction, of su#ficient off-street parking spaces such thafi the total number of parking spaces shall be equivalent to one and one-half (1.5) spaces per residential unit (including garages as a parking space). Natwithstanding the above Developer acknowlec#ges the City's desire for two-car garages per _�_ residential unit and agrees to use its best effort ta market and construct residential units with twa-car garages far each residentia! unit. 13. The Developer agrees to construct a lawn irrigation system in Phase 1. The Developer shall submit to the City for approval plans of the lawn irrigation system. Developer further agrees that the irrigatian system shal) be designed by a professionai registered engineer. The City reserves the exclusive right to approve ar request madifications to the lawn irrigation system. The lawn irrigation system shail be completed by the Developer and shall be free and ciear of any lien, ciaim, charge ar enct�mbrance, including any far wark, labor or services rendered in connectian therewith, materials or equipment supplied therefore, on or before the iatter of two (2} years fram the date hereof. Upon compietion end acceptance, the peveloper warrants and guarantees that the Improvements agair�st any defects of materiais or workmanship for a period of twa {2) years fai}awing seid compietion and acceptance. in the event any defect in materials of workmanship within said twa year period, warranty or guarantee shall be a period of three (3) years following said compietian and acceptance. Defects and materials of warkmanship shai) be determined by the City. 14. Prior to release of a finai plat, the Develaper shaf{ dedicate to the City a sixty foot (6Q'} wide right-of-way, subject to approval by the City of exact location and legal description, for the Phase 1 roadway designated on Exhibit C (hereinafter called "Loop Road"). Deve}aper agrees to dedicate said right-of- way free and clear af all liens, encumbrances and mortgages. � 15. Prior ta release of a€inal plat, Reveloper shall compiete construction of the �oop Road. 16, Rrior ta release of a finai piat, Developer shaii dedicate, or have � dedicated, to the City an eighty foot (80') wide right-of-way, subject to approval by the City of exact location and (egal description, on Mendota Heights Road from its beginning point on the westerly border af the Property easterly to Deiaware Ave. The Developer agrees to dedicate said right-of-way free and ciear af aii liens, encumbrances, and mortgages. 17. The Developer agrees that all lots in Phase 1 shail have a front yard setback of twenty five feet (25'). Binding Effect of Agreement: 18. The Developer acknawledges anci agrees that upan entering this Agreement, the City in no way waives its right of final approva# of the materials and submissions required herein, including, but not limited to the final piat and th� City expressly reserves its right to deny approval af any plans,; the final plat and any building permits shauld the Deveioper fail ta proceed in accardance with this Agreement andior fail to, perform in total complianee with the abligations herein. 19. The Deve(oper acknowledges that the rights af the City to performance of the obligations of the Developer cantempiated by and speci#ied within this Agreement are special, unique, and of extraordinary character, and that, in the event that the Developer viplates, fails, or refuse to perform any � covenant, condition or provisioh made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy of law. The Developer agrees, therefore, that in the event it violates, faiis or refuses to perform any covenant, conditian or provision made herein, City may, at its option, 'rnstitute and prosecute an action to specificaily enforce performance af such covenant. No remedy referred in this Agreement is intended to be exciusive and sha!! be cumulative and shali be in addition to every ather rsmedy. The election of any one or mare remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any ather remedy. ' � 20. Any term o# this Agreement that is iliegal or unenforceable at law or in equity shall be deemed ta be vaid and of no force and effect to the extent necessary ta bring such term within the pravisians of any such applicable law or laws, and such terms are sa madified in the balance af the terms af this Agreement shall be enforceabie. ' 21. Provisions af this Agreement shal! be binding upon and enforceable against the Developer, its successors, and its assigns af the Prope`rty herein described. ' ; 22. The Deve4aper shall pravide written notice to the City af the; name and address of any potentiai purchaser, assignse, successor ar transferee thirty � (30} days prsor to any sale, conveyance or transfer af the Property. 23. Developer sheii reimburse the City immediately upan the demand far any and all City administrative time and iabor costs af consuiting engineering services, costs of legal services and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by � the City arising aut of ar in connection with this Agreement or the enforcement thereaf. � SIGNATURES FOR DEVEI.OPER 't , ; Subseribed and sworn to befare me this � day of , 1987. , ' atary u �c � ' SiGNATURES F�R THE CITY OF MEND4TA HEIGHTS By ts ayar attent lts 1ty er QtltC fI�I� iii�i �+EfiSt�t Mt+dLtm Dputty Pcrk � Toml s8. BS Aer+es aa.so wcns 62.25 AcreD 4p. DD Acrea 102.25 Acna �t. � � � �1` J .... �'��'�'�� `� � j r�-,� ��,;"�-""' II " � i ''.�-�--+' �-----�--�` -'.--- --�-1 �-�'" � � �'4 ,1 ��K,�`�°'`E�u,, �j �1 _ �,.� '.�-,' ��. ---_. �,..� -. ��'' �,� l!..1z'�unzi�i.i n `�,.' t �j� � � / �.6►'"' � �� ..ra► � l+rtira � � `WJ PARK - Nei� tt� {�..1'� I.I fi ACres ��Q� ;i 1 �` � 5.hw�. , L� � w�s1 '� f ��. �"Y�„�,� �i_/`` � 1 � , * � ^: • SRE D J `t �"'+;�„reT�� ,' iltpA flt+lst �� f�—�`'`j � �,� {�t8 Untts, 3 5 Ii��r _.,--1 4 �`��' 'ti_ \��:7 UntWAc � STlE C � � HipR p��, 88 t/n(u, � S Acns � \, �j\ Il.� UntGslAcrY �w �' L. \ `_•,� v � � . ,� , a..-- + - : �_---�-.-,• � �:.�� =,� � �g g � p�a �;.. : :, � 'y = P-] PARK - Comm�nity Reere Niph p�yT��, %tc�e•�y,y��.'. _ - ': • 1: 24.6 ACe+Es ; .,� ,.- 25 Untts, t � � •ti;wt • �� ! :;'•.. ' ' . 6.7 thlttyAa �nes � �..:� �� : � •�..- •Sw,�? �,�ea:r •'� , w+t� ,.� � , •��,■y �z�/ �� ': �!_�` `% ?.;:�+�„;� • �.�`' * i`.Ir+a; �. k ...._a„ � ,- �- _ �� '�: ""�r�..,w�.�..r�,t�� y.~ . • �.99� . ' S.4sa. - ,I/ 'S7TEE� t� High p��, t 92 Llnits, 7.8 A ( 1J.8 UnitsJAc►t \ ( `� ; !�) �. � �. P'-S PARK - Lake�hon� 9.tt Acrcs Total , a., ,��►� �„�r, L_� .� �, w 4 �•. �;�� '`��+'''�� `r _• _ . h11-1� � �� \ --._�� '�� Yaditua Dens� 3�•••.0• ; � ♦'""�w�r��i��w�r��s��w.�� 0 ��1�� i r.��.�.r �.�..�. r.ri+�w.�.� 0 • � ✓ ', r ��f� � � . .,` �'.1 ' '� , � f� !'� .t �t vr ,'(r � i �!� �t `t �'•�\r� /'�i jr :i,;l: � _, ,�`• �` '�C� ' ! � • )'�` �1� 1t��.. �'✓'✓�r'�I,r �'• ,j `Y ,� ��a � '�• '`•,�' • � � ;� ' �'' �- .i'i� j',;� �1:�;'>, _ � �,1 ,;:.,;. �.. ,•f �� ( � . .�, .','.�'' . �� •` `. .�� , ��i ��r � � = i��t �"ji/ : t �`�`,� 1 ` .i,`. �"� �i � ' � � � ,�� ' i'�:i :�. i �r! ,e i' �;: t � � .\.•�� . • . ';��. i• � 1t �'� ' �` :1 , ., .. �, , , �l ..� .. .. � 1;� �,t �� : f; �; fF;r� �,'� . . � �.',�. ` . :, '„;l�;.. `.�:., , , r, , � f � :.. ,.. �. �r �;I'r'�'I �_�'Q,�(�'a'��'� , . `:,�;�..� �� .,� :t ,.. ;' � ' �t .-.�� / ; � t �'� . , r � � . � . j� ! 1 ��f •i i ` �' '`"' �i %f i�. � •,� � � � ��. .� ri . . j: Fn � �y�L� • ;�, • , �}�,�l,' ; ' .�:,� . , . �,. j ; '"—' �i . '� �lii ' � u ��f :;' i e r'- ��,,;" � '+ j � �• , '''. � j i��t�� , � �' . r. .., j • `� � � '' � . . ; `== :_ • - _ . _ . ,` � ; ___. ��_-'% 'i";�'•�n�z fr�(n r!Nrriijs;�, �r�n!li� ��; . : / �(� 'f,f,%' �• `�•�'� t , J � i�h�+' ��' �� 14��: {� �;i��.{�I��i� �� . �� , t �' . '�., � '' � ' � �a�, i��4� �ji� j�••r��i; ��.l�t�t��F'I(rr��s��y�' � r ,, , �, •.. ;:�t�(•� ,. � ., ,. ' ' i � �s(. ,;. i �.7•�,r� �',ri1 �; �,I;!, f / r ;;r�. . .>� . •,:,. '� �. � ��hl1i'( (i11i �r�(.�-�J�,,�„�,Iit ��!.,,<<�,�f . �,,, � ,,. � •.� . . �'� t,,. 'r, i,• � � f, hi. �.� l��r !�� l1i ! � � ��1 �� .�. �� .� . � � +�i it�y � ��•ii� �.+ ��'i,�+t i� r a I# 1 , .. ` 1� �Is it�J �! r,,4r�H•t�� p� i,�a ��. � t �et i � l: • ,,• ``� � • � r j11�� i� 711��(�. �(ti: �i��'�;�,��i{{{� J ,, ,�, /' ' �j} . • � d' ^, i's"j�jf I ;,t�l «�i:{•(;�t+,�ft�l+�!�;;��;�t, tl( , `� �j � '�+ �i� ( .l � +A _,i � �� i jjl�` �..r�I�j � . �� "1��!'i:'' ��;�,{�'t��' ,j: � �� i i�! 1� �� + ,� . . �•,�� ` � `�1� ., . . , �r �k' f . ' ! �i � � '� ' tt :, t' ; —__. 7 �! /..� / 'W r ^� / • � ia l �._. _. . • � i j /j' • i 1 Ij % fl i_ 1 ~ �' �-t'� ��,� i � , .�, i �I f � _" ,,:t'r:�:.''' � t ! � �� . dA1 *..... / t 1 ' �� 1 t � � �,,,-:' r�� .� �'�-�._.� ,.�11 ' �`� ��.. - 7, � ��1�� li � � . �;.._„�_____ '/ ___ _ Y i•` r � �i j '� � � j ,..�,.. ; ' '/NG� � -- , � � .' �� t I 't � �: ``�'i .._ , r/. � — �. '•�,,. � i i? : � . 1 i��(` �' � '`� f.,'�'� / � ,' } � t ' � ( 1 � ` `1 :_..� s �• �' _ , ; t `1: �� ;�� 'i{ r' , t' �,; ', w �� •' r � ;,,1 a ,� I — ; _ �, � � x ; �'�,,,,i s� •,, , � _ _ y =`� � � � d�l , 1�� _._} - � �r'`•t 1 i "1` • �� ` � .* ! r'� ; \\` O w - .. _',i' ` _ -- � C� I'i \ ' .,' - Y' � r ^ = ��„� _: - � • • 7Ca� � '1� f—ry _~`� • � :• ' �! �,, .�� ' ,� � 3 N � � � � � �� " � "� r �4�'� I t , {`� 1 � io 1�� i i s .�i �� t t �m• + �•;, � '"- .. �` Q ; i M F" .• � } � � ' ��; '%� " , . • ;c '� � r� �� ' � � � ��, . � . . i _ . �_ ' �� ! a�` � ��° � ,' '+ ' y �'' �� ^� �� ` �� i, s ..� � `. -•' • �:_ .. ,.�� g � i � ' 'r+ _ — �� ti � �1` `• �� • � t � �oy� � ' �� '. �� ♦ . , r '' y N � : l� .. `�� • . .. � I.� � , . .,� �„ + - �� t � � -. - � `� .. . �; :. � � .. �:_: i,�' ``,` . •i � •,' ' ; '�• . . _ {i: !! `' �� ( � . � r' � � a� � r!I -�"� I �L _.._.J, f�'�) _ .� : .,,,___ 'I i �i . i�� 1 � �, � .!-;�' � '` 4 HIEEa t I�i " -._`—_ � i • '• `i i � � � { — OQt�'I � ~'` , ', '^ � t r • � , � `� '�`4 j .�' , �. ` f ( �� /"""'♦ � \f � I ,f� � ; "� � i \\;a . � . � i �i; j __.,. �� ••j ' 1 ' �� —�� . � I � j .3 � � .�` � . • , � . • . +.r.� - +�■ �.�.�.....r.�... - " CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNE50TA ORDINANCE NO. 246 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota ordains as follows: Section 1. Ordinance No. 401, known and referred to as the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended in the following respects: A. The following described property, commonly referred to � as Kensington Planned Unit Development, Phase I, situated�in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota ' County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned from an "R-1," One Family Residential District, as the case may be, to an "HR-PUD" high-density residential Planned Unit � Development, to-wit: NOTEi Legal descriptions will be available by Tuesday evening. Staff will prepare a revised Ordinance including legal descriptions for d'istribution with the revised meeting agenda. �The above described property contains acres, more or less. Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Mendota Heights referred to and described in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning herein- above inabove provided for in this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. 5ection 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 247 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota ordains as follows: � and referred to hereby amended 5ection 1. Ordinance No. 401, known the "Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance," is the following respects: as in A. The following described property, commonly referred to as Kensington Planned Unit Development, Phase I, situated in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned from an "R-1," One Family Residential District, as the case may be, to an "MR-PUD" medium-density residential Planned Unit Development, to-wit�: NOTE: Legal descriptions will be available by Tuesday ! evening. Staff will prepare a revised Ordinance including legal descriptions for distribution with the revised meeting agenda. ' The above described property contains acres, more or less. Section 2. The'Zoning Map of the City of Mendota; Heights referred to arid described in said Ordinance No: 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of Mendota Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning,�but the City Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information,shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. i Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force�and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAK4TA COUNTYr MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NQ. 87-12� � RESOLUTIQN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CASE 87-24, KENSINGTON � MULTIFAMILY PROJECT, PHASE I � Whereas, Centex Homes, Inc. has proposed a multifamily resi.dential planned unit development project in southeast Mendota Heights; and Whereas, by Resolution No. 87-12d�� the Ci�y Council has given;averall sketch plan concept approval ta that plan; and Whereasr Phase I of the is consistent with the approved sketch plan; and . Whereas, Phase I is also consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zaning Ordinance of the City of Mendata Heights. NaW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci.ty Cauncil of the City of Mendota Hea,ghts, that a conditional u�e permit for a planned unit development be granted to Centex Homes to al,low the development of 136 manor homes as shown on drawings dated December , 1.987, subject to the following canditions: Adopted by the City Council of the Ci�y of Mendota Heigh�s this 15th day of December, 198'7, � CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � By Charles E. Mertensatta ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk n CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA , DEVELOpER'S AGREEMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVEI. NT A K N T VE MENT Kensingtan Developmeni: Case No. 8?-24 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of Qecember, 1987, by and between the City af Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota (hereinafter called the "City") and Centex Homes, Inc., c/o Tandem Corpora�ion, 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (hereinafter called the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has applied ta the City for (i} Zone District Changes from One Family Residen#ia) �R-1} to High Density Residentia! - Planned Unit Qevelopment (HR-PUD) and Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development (MR-PUD) and (ii) Planned Unit Development Cancept Approval for approximately one hundred two (102 +) acres, located north of Interstate Highway 494, east of the Interstate Highway 494 interchange at Dodd Road; south of Mendota Heights Road and west of Deiaware Avenue, situated in Dakota County, State of Minnesota, and more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto ar�ct made a part hereof (hereinafter called the "Property"}; WHEREAS, the Developer pro�aoses to develop an the Property a planned development consisting of a five hundred (500) r•esidential unit and approximately forty (40 +) acres af park lancl and recreational facilities in l _ accordance with the illustration shown on Exhibit B, attached hereta and made • a part hereof (hereinafter called the "Kensington Planned Unit Development"); WHEREAS, the Developer has appiied to the City for pretiminary plat approvaf of Phase I of the Kensington Planned Unit Development; WHEREAS, Phase i shall cansist af one hundred thirty-six (136) residential units on approximately twenty-two (22 +) acres located on the west end af the Property and be developed in accardance with the iliustration shown an Exhibit C, attached hereia and made a part hereof {hereafter cailed "Phase 1"} i WHEREAS, Phase 1 was reviewed and approved, subject to certain conditions, by the City Pianning Cammission an November 24, 1987; WHEREAS, Phase 1 was reviewed and approved, subject to certain conditions, by the City Council an December 15, 1987,• WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed that Phase I shal) fully comply with and conform ta the canditions specified herein; and NOW, TNEREF�RE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance Nas. 246- 247, 4rdinar►ce amenclir�g the City Zaning Districts; and Resolution 87-121, Resolution approving conditional use permit for Phase 1 of Kensingtan Ptanned Unit Development, the Developer cavenants and agrees to deveiop and maintain the Property, subject ta the following conc4itions: � f Preliminary Plat Approval: r 1. The Deve(oper shall devefop and maintain Phase 1 in conformance with the Development Plan received, reviewed and approved by the City Council or� December 15, 1988, and attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit D, subject to such changes and modificatians provided herein. The Developer shall not deveiap, construct upon or maintain Phase 1 in any other respect ar manner than provided herein. 2. Developer acknawledges that pursuant to the City's Zoning Ordinance, constructian of Phase 1 must commence within one ('I} year from the date af approvai; unless the City Council, at its sole discretian extends the construction period for an additional one { 1) year. 3. The Developer agrees that it shall submit ta the City for approval a written schedule indicating the progress schedule and order af completion af the Phase 1. , 4. Prior to the release of a final plat, the Developer shall submit ta the City for approval five (5} copies af a develapment plan {1"=140' scale) showing any existing and praposed contours, proposed streets, and lot arrangements and size, minimal floor elevations of each Iot, preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer, 100-year fiood plain contours, ponding areas, tributaries ta catch basins, arrows showing direciion of storm water flow on all lots, 4ocation of walk, trailsJ and any property to be deeded, sold, conveyed or transferred to the City. Said plans are hereby made a part of this Agreement. � 5. Prior to the release af a final platJ the Developer sha!! submit to the City far approval, final plans for all sanitary sewer, watermain, and starm sewer faciiities, drainage facilities, concrete curb, gutters, sidewa(ks, streets, and other misc�ilaneaus work (hereinafter called "Improvements") to be made and constructed on or within the property to be dedicated to the City. Said plans are hereby made a part of this Agreement. Develaper further agrees that all Irnprovements shail be designed by a registered professional engineer in compiiance with City, State and Federal standards. The Gity reserves the exclusive right to approve or request madifications to the Improvements. All such Improvements shall be completed by the Developer and shall be free and clear of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including any for wark, labor or services rendered in connectian therewith, materials or equipment supplied therefore, on ar l�efore the later af two t2) years from the date hereaf. Upon completian and acceptance, the Developer warrants and guarantees that the lmprovements will be free from any defects of materiais or workmanship for a period af twa {2) years fallowing said completian and acceptance. In the event any defect in materials af workmanship within said twa year periad, warranty or guarantee shall be a period of three (3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects and materials of workmanship sha11 be determined by the Gity. � 6. Prior to the release of a final plat, the Developer shall submit ta the City for approval, final plans far grading, drainage and landscaping (hereinafter calfied "l�andscaping Improvements"} of Phase 1, Said plans are hereby made a part af this Agreement. Developer further agrees that all Landscaping Improvements shall be designed by a registered professianal engineer in compliance with City standards. The City reserves the exclusive right ta approve or request madifications to the Landscaping Improvements. All such Landscaping Improvements shail be completed by the Developer and shall be free and clear of any iien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including any far work, labor or services rendered in cannection therewith, materials or equipment supplied therefare, on or before the later of two (2) years from the date hereof. Upon completion and acceptance, the peveloper warrants and guarantees that the Landscaping Improvements against any defects of materials or warkmanship for a periad af iwa {2} years failowing said completion and acceptance. In the event any defect in materials of workmanship within sald twa year period, warranty or guarantee shall be a period of three (3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects and materials of workmanship shall be determined by the City. Development of Ph�se 1: 7. Deveiaper agrees that, anything to the contrary herein natwithstanding, the City of Mendata Heights City Council and its agents or employees shal! not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the peveloper, the Developer's contractors ar subcontractors, materiaimen, laborers or to any other person ar persons whomsoever, for any ciaim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind ar character arising out of ar by reason af the executian of this Agreement or the performance and completion of the work and the improvements pravided herein. The Developer will indemnify and save the City harmless from all such claims, d�mands, damages, actions or causes of ac�ions ar the cost of disbursement, and expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without intending to limit the categaries of said costs, cost and expenses for City administrative time and labor, casts af consulting -5- engineering services and costs of legal services rendered in connection with defending such claims as may be brought against the City. In addition, the Developer shall alsa reimburse the City immediateiy upan demand for any anci all City administrative time and labor casts of consulting engine�ring services, costs af legal services and other out O'� �?OCItB'C expenses incurred by the City arising out of or in connectian with this Agreement. 8. Unii) acceptance by the City af any such deed of conveyance of any Improvements, the Deve{oper shall be solsly respansible for all maintenance and repair of the streets and other public improvements constructed hereunder. The Ciiy shall be respansible for al1 maintenance and repair after acceptance of said deed(s) af conveyance. Priar ta canveyance of the public impravements to ihe City, the Developer shall cause warning signs to be placed on and around such streets and other improvement whenever any dangerous or hazardous condition exists an such property and shali establish any necessary detour rautes. If and when streets become impassable, such streets sha!! be barricaded and clased. In the event residences are occupied priar to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dir� and debris that may spill or wash anto the street frorn his operation. If the streets are black-topped, the Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from said streets prior to finai acceptance af said streets. The Developer shall save the City harmless from any and all damages or injury, whether to person or property, caused by or relating to the snow plowing operatians provided by the City prior to conveyance of title to the public improvements by the � Developer to the City, The provision by the City of snow plowing service does not in any way constitute final acceptance of the pubiic improvements. 9. The Developer covenants, warrants and agrees that a41 labar a�d work sha{i be done and performed in the best and most warkmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. Na construction shall begin until final plans and final piat are appraved by the City. No deviations fram the approvec! plans a�d specifications shall be permitted unless approved in writing by the City, � 10. The City shali not issue any buiiding permit for the constructian of any building, structure, or improvement, on or in Phase 1 until all conditions af this Agreement have been satisfactorily addressed by the Developer and the • Phase 1 has been inspected and accepted by the City. Conditians: 11. The Developer agrees to construct all sidewalks in Phase 1 to a width of , five feet (S'). 12. The Developer agrees that in additiQn to providing one (1) garage per residential unit, Developer shall provide proof of the availability, to the City's sole satisfactian, af sufficient aff-street parking spaces such that the tatal number af parking spaces shal) be equivalent to one and one-half (1.5} spaces per residential unit (including garages as a parking space). Notwithstanding the above Develaper acknowledges the City's desire for two-car garages per � residentiai unit and agrees ta use its best effQrt to market and construct residential units with two-car garages for each residential unit. 13. The Developer agrees ta construct a lawn irrigation system in Phase 'i. The Developer shall submit ta the City for approval plans of the lawn irrigation system. Developer further agrees that the irrigation system shall be designed by a professional registered engineer. The City reserves the exclusive right ta approve or request modifications ta the lawn irrigatian system. The lawn irrigation system shafl be completed by the Developer and shal) be free and clear of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including any far wark, labor or services rendered in cannectivn therewith, materials ar equipment suppiied therefore, on or before the latter af twa {2} years from the date hereof, Upon campletion and acceptance, the Developer warrants and guarantees that the Improvements against any defects of materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years folfowing saici campletion and acceptance. In the event any defect in materials of workmanship within said two year period, warranty or guarantee shall be a period af three (3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects and materials of workmanship shall be determined by the City. 14. Prior to release of a final plat, the Developer shall dedicate to the City a sixty foot (60') wide right-af-way, subject to approval by the City of exact location and legal description, for the Phase 1 roadway designated on Exhibit C (hereinafter called "Loap Raad"). Developer agrees to dedicate said right-of- way free and clear of a!{ liens, encumbrances and mortgages. � 15. Priar to release of a finai plat, Developer shali campiete construction of the Loop Road. 16. Prior to release of a final plat, Developer shall dedicate, or have dedicated, to the City an eighty foot (80') wide right-af-way, subject ta approval by the City of exact locatian and iegaf description, on Mendota Heights Road from its beginning point on the westerly border of the Property easterly to Delaware Ave. The Developer agrees to dedicate said right-of-way free and clear of al1 (iens, encumbrances, and martgages. i 17. The Developer agrees that al! lots in Phase 1 shall have a front yard setback of twenty five feet (25'). Binding Effect of Agreement; 18. The Develaper acknowledges and agrees that upon entering this Agreement, the City in no way waives its right of final approvai of the materials and submissions required herein, incfuding, but not limited to the final plat and the City expressly reserves its right ta deny approval of any plans, the final plat and any building permits should the Developer fail ta praceed in accordance with this Agreement and/or faii ta perform in total compliance with the obligatians herein. 19. The Developer acknowledges that the rights of the Gity to performance of the obligations of the Developer contemplated by and specified within this Agreement are special, unique, and of ,extraordinary character, and that, in the event that the t?evalaper violates, fails, or refuse to perform any � covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy of (aw. The Developer agrees, therefore, that in the event it violates, fails or refuses to perform any covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce performance of such covenant. No remedy referred in this Agreement is intended to be exclusive and shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of ahy other remedy. 20. Any term of this Agreement that is illegal or unenforceabie at law or in equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force and effect to the extent necessary to bring such term within the provisions of any such applicable law or laws, and such terms are so modified in the balance of the terms of this Agreement shall be enforceable. 21. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Developer, its successors, and its assigns of the Property herein described. 22. The Developer shall provide written notice to the City of the name and address of any potential purchaser, assignee, successor or transferee thirty (30) days prior to any sale, conveyance or. transfer of the Property. 23. Developer shall reimburse the City immediately upon the demand for any and all City administrative time and labor costs of consulting engineering services, costs of legal services and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by -10- the City arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the enforcement tfi�ereaf. SIGNATUF2ES FQR DEVE�OPER Subscribed and sworn ta before me this day of , 1987. otary Pu �c � SIGNATURES FOR THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By {ts ayor Attent Its �ty er � -11- ��Y �� ; �� Nigh Derta{ty t8,65 Acrrs .,�-- �� ty 1�.60 rlcres ./� 62.25 Acrea . � �� Pa►'k 40. 00 Acres / / Tatat IO2.25 Acr+ss r � ' � , / �.!»"� �, � � � �l � r � 1�'°�' � � � —'� v �\ i � � i > � � � ��'�....r.. iF�IF O� � � � ` �� g��gA pe.utty � �l36 Untts, 223 Acnrs a 8.1 t�Fn, itslAcra �+�`ri �' �� C�,r/ �pK � ��.._ �—�.`�___,_ __.! --- E � � i .''`' � �.____.._._ _—___..____a��-- � �.: � �+ ^-��. ,�' .,...,.,... � (� � -f�� P 1 PARK - Nti�fiDmiioocJ � � . �� ! � RecreaUa� � ti / WJL{. � � High D�� Ea unrts, 7 s Acrea 1,1 _1� 11.T Units/Ar�e f � �`p.,�� :t,.% Vi"� �� r�,��`'i �\ — S1T6 D Hrs►, r�iY 48 Untis, 3.5 �3.T Units/,�c V . � r�t a--�- - - �.- • � �..�_. �� t�,� g iir� �� _� �'•., :•;. �r= P'1 PARK - Comr�anity Recet I Hipih ��, 'ck��,t _ ''�' J: 24.6 Acrea: y,� p ,..,.- ?5 0 i�. � ..' • t t ��•.. I �Units, t Ac�+ss � ; ; � _= ""�,,; �cy.,;��,; • s. unrw�sn y .. � M:� ..,s�ac�tr h�J =:i :4' S�..rii � /� .(,: i:�� • �'�'w`' r `i..Fwi.� � � ."„` +s.,, �1 /i �'' _ :�� +� �-��r ,- � �' � ~` .,. � 1 �..�. .. +�: � �'� ""�r�r+rrara�+j�.�r. , . � .�. 94� . . �. Ma. . . ��I � �; ' STJ'E E � t N�Bn au��, , 92 Untts, � 8 A� `l1.8 Unfts/Acrt ` _ V `` I 1, ■ \\. // l\ � , { � S77"E F � � � i 7" �� t � 4� �� S Acr+ts �/!_ [�.�+ �� * Ui1lWAcryr r (� J" y • ��{�, �,,. � . � �. �,.� �� P 2 rARK - Lclaeatan �i� � 9.t4 Acres Tatai � �,.4 0�� vo„a, 1 �.�. �,... .�,: w..� ��-- �""� p�.��"�,,,.—�� {/.�-�� + ., .. .r*+' it�A .+ .,� ; . �� ;� �� r Mtdium D� � � 85 UnfLs, 13,6 Acr+e� � , � ! ! 4 �1 �1 �r � � � � r1 � r � � � r � � � i r � i � f � n r .-,...;, ;gi:; . � . . ..;... :, , N . . . . ` . � ' exn�i�ic c -- . . . -` .,,: . � �. ` , �-' � f „ I � � . �. I . /. ' . ''•:�. . • • ' , _-�---_-• '-�--• � • - . i�.: � ••` r. _ •'_• . 1 ' . , i . \�� / � �^ , t • . e' ' }= , . +�. - �' i �� " + - -•-- _ • Propos�d LiW asuWtb^` �_ •,` yer.. r..+r , � � _. ' �:_� - _ - =T{-+ `: `�' . /� � � . WrdoVnrnt wu E:- - _ �-c 3 ; •• , . • ' j� • rrr w�� p��w �`^7 ��T—=� �:.,`, � / � � .�..r � .��..� G =":��s�''_'t �. � '� / ,(�P�1Q ' L'� J`:Y' jrA'�G'"` ti� � �+ ' 11 S ' '' AIFi� ��•�� r�"_ � . -- ` 1r,� �' `��• � � . ' � s' r ,_ ' �= � ! ,• -~�i • \ 2 � . "_T-'^:_:�.`s •^=5 � .'' „i.' ii.�� ' �� •�. �i ,/ ,a� ��Li�'�.''r':D.i` ' I ' r � ` /' 1\, `�' � � I �+ �� ' � •'/ � � � ' • ��' ..._ � w� � I� 'I � .` � i '�\�- � '�' `--.r�-�" ��' � n��• �� ;1� • �I, ' i� o ''�i `�."!"?�� - �� y.��\\\ .w. `.1 (� 1^ 1 I ; 1 � • _"� \�,. ` - _� __' �`; • ,` �'. � t • `�� 1 II ` � %� � . � � � � - �� ' �'. � � �' ` � � � � \ � / 1 r ' f ,, _ `�\ . �� j i '� r. / � � _ � ,' i , . -= � -�� • � > � �.� , , • �'+� . .� � \ ; ;, i a : . . � � � i � . � ��'`'- � . i � t�w ' f � ��` Y \�\ �•� L � � �� '+0' ''--- i . Mv''» ,�` i � � ` � `�. � " "��:i i ' ' • � �. -e_^-,- � �� s j y/ •i �-• ' � , , � -- � + ;�� j • ' f' -'- ' " � ' � � • .... . �� i�� `�:�y ! � .�� \ . •. �` ' � �:��' �; �� `�� `�� ' � ' � ��• �.� �l � � �! � ` +��` � 1 �� --- � �' �. _.. ��. ' � i 7 •w �� \ 1 . , . , �_ .. ` y' i sl \ � � �1 ��'' �\ 1 � � . Ir� Ir�r �.l�t. �tY�W�lI ` ' � ,• 4 _ ��, . . ,� . � � - �,,.o... ir,r� , ��..-_ ; `� ,, , � '�, ,�� . ,; � .w , , �_ � .. _ � �� --- � � -;-- .:� �� . : �\\ ;�. ,- ,; . .. , . .Ji � . . ;I 1 � � � _ • - ,��"z` - ti. • ----- �' • --, � � �.' � , , " ,- . , , , �� --�- ; ; ,:� , , r-�+-�„�::_ _ - �\ ; 1 � r i � j w.� �. : ::` -+r:`A _ �, '` ;, � � • f• I �\,�`�� 1 � Q I , � � , � �_�w.__, .�,� .� •-.��_. •\�•� .('i' :.b • ' t ��__��\ \;; •\``� _.`� �' ' _ •� ' r�' � . . _ � � i S� ,�� • ��,, IM' � _ \ '�.�_ � � � � 1i i ' \ � 1 � �: � ., '. '�' ; � � � `. � �^\ .' , �' ); ( i;�� , � �. '. � ;` , � � ,� ; ; : . i f(`, � �... � � � � `� , -L_ � `. . , �;:� r ,: � . , � :` � r �" J ► �., . :��-:� ^ . � . , i � , �. .� : i � " %T , .- � , � , --_�_-�� _'�' -�-- ` ` ``; � � , r,/r'i 1� ` '� _ /j , '---' ; :� i . � �� _-- , � �:-' - � = -----" --_ __ �� • ' � !. 1 I • _ =-__ _ -__V J 1., L �:'` _ .'"�,'-----=- - ,''.^i ' ' ' ', ; I � ' - --___ '��=�-- -==_ � ---------_-`-�=====_- �. ..- ' ` --____�_ _ ---- --- ----.-,_ -- ____-= :___=-=-- ��-_`_'� � ��'%� �_ __ �--__-- ---- •-- _�-' ` � • W.e. h1�� _-= = - I � h ��r ��wbPmalt Pl�n `\!\ ^`^- �»,� . _ - ;�:� 'L:rCC' C�nt�x Mom� Corpont . . . . � ----��_ -- ��---, � 6�59 8�lur Ro�d. �. �' Kensin�ta� ,�.,,, M., w � '_ --"_-__- r a.- __ ua MlrwNbNu. M1nrN�o ES��S �fIr1C(� VYllt � 1 � �1 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 8, 19$7 TO: Mayor and City Council � FROM:; Kevin D. ��e r'' City Administratar SUBJECT: Cammunity Develapment Block Grant Application for 3 1988 Funding Cyc1e The City of Mendota Heights is eligible to request a portion of Dakota County's Community Development Block Grant entitlemen�. This federal program, designed to meet the needs of low and moderate incame residents, has �reviously been used bX the City for asse�sment abatements in the north end street zmpravement pro�ect, and for housing rehabilitation and weather�za�ion programs. We aurrently have about $68,044 left over fram these previaus projects, which �he Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authorit� is holding in an account for u� toward housing rehabiZitation prajects. Housing and Redevelopment Autharity Direotor Mark U1£ers ha� suggested that the City apply far an additional $35,000 for housing rehabilitation. This will enable HRA.,to rehabilitate about four homes. They anticipate that matching funds can be obtained from th� Minnesata Housing Finance Ag�ncy, so that the total project would enable eight Mendata Heights' homeowner� to receive rehabilitatian and weatherization assistance. City staf£ has been unable to think of any other eligible uses for CDBG funds in the cammunity. There�ore, I have asked Mr. Ulfers to prepare a hausing rehabilitation grant�application for us. That application is attached. Mark will be present at the Council meeting af December 15 to�discuss the application with Council, and ta seek your approval af the autharizing resolution. ACTIQN REQUIRED; , AEter discussing the program, if Council wishes to participate, it should pass a motion adopting th� resolu�ion approving the application �or Fiscal Year 1988 Community Development Block Grant Funding. KDF:madlr attachments CC�I�NTY � � � Serving People and Communities � November 24, 1987 Kevin Fra2e11, Ci�y Administrator City af Mendo�Ga Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendo�.a Heigh�Gs,. MN 55120 Dear.Kevin: DAKC►TA COU�1r� HOUSING & REDEVELOFMENT AI:f7['H13RITY 249b - 145th STREET WE5T ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-48p0 Enclosed, for your considera�ion, please find 3 copies of the Mendota Heights Hausir�g Rehabilitation Project application. The application requests $35,000 af the CDBG Entitl.ement money for hausing rehab. It is estimated that four (4) homes would be able to be rehabilitated with an average cost af $7,500. For your information, we have enclased a map and list of hames in yaur community that have received housing rehab or energy loan assistance. The deadline established by the Community Development Committee requires the application be approved by the City Council by December 15th. I� you have questions or concerns, please call. Since ely, Mark S. Ulf rs Executive Director MSU:12 Enclosures �,�.r,��,'� "AN FCJl1A) C1PP(')RTIINITY CAApIlIY�D" a City of Mendota Heights RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR.ANT FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as follows: 1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year 1988. 2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. 3. That the Dakota County HRA be designated as the administrative entity to carry out the program on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this - day of , 1987. ATTEST: � Mayor � Dakota county Community Development Slack Grant Propasal Fiscal Year 19$8 City ofi Me�dota Heights 2 �egai Name of Appiicant Community Deveiapment District 750 Snufih P1aza,�,�ive Legal Address of Appiicant Mendota Heights Minnesota 5512Q City State Zip Kevin Frazell Cantact Ferson City Adminjstrator � 6].2 � 452-1850 7itle Phone Number Mendota Neights Housing Rehabilitation Project Project Name i"he city-wide project consists af loan & deferred loan funds for rehabilitation of singie family, awner-occupied dwellings. Srief Description of Project $35,000 Amount Requested I, Nas this praject received funding COBG before? � Yes � No 2, Project duration: � One Year � Other (Specify}: _ 18 months Proposed beginning date: 5-1-88 Proposed completion date: 1I-1-89 3. Grant funds will be used for: � ' Acquisition . � Clearance Activities � �1S�OS7�10� Q Economic Development � Planning f� Public Faciiities , � Pub]ic Services ` � Rehabilitation � Other (Specify): 4. Federal abjective addressed tattach documentation}; p Benefit to low and maderate income persons p Aid in the preventian or elimination of slums and blight � Alleviation of urgent community development need 5. General description of the project (inciude project gaais and impartance ta� - community): Provision of law interest and deferred loans for low and maderate ineome homeowners. Any form of owner-occupied housing wauld be eligible. For more infarmaiion see Attachment A. The HRA may be able to ieverage ._ additional funds thraugh the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. �'� 6, Description af project area (attach map): The �ro,'Lect area consists of the entire coprporate limits of the Citv of Mendata Heiqhts. (See attached map) 7, Persans benefiting: Total number of persons benefiting: 4 households Percentage of lowlmoderate income: 100 � 8. Construction scheduie: � � Not Applicab7e � Applicable If applicable: Estimated date constructian will begin: May_j,., I988 Estimated date constructi on wi 3 i be campl eted : ovemb r.�� ,98g 9.` Project cost: Total project cost: Amount af C.D. Grant requested: $ 3��. (Percentage of tatai project cost): `_. 50 � Source and amount of other revenue: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency $35,000 1Q. Budget surnrnary by dC�'i V1ty: Activity Hausin4 rehabilitation and',.rel�ated . ,�r.o�j ect ._ _ administra�pn. Total � � �� , CDBG OtherJList Source Total � 35.000 $ 35,000 MHFA $70,000 '� f/1 '� i!i ', i /ii � �� 21. Additianal supporting items submitted with proposat (check if attachedj: Benefit dacumentation (see questian 4) Resolution of governing body requesting grant Additianai project information Map or sketch outlining praject area � ProfessiQnal's certificatian of feasibility and accuracy of scope and budget (engineer's, architect's, etc.) I�I i �!J Letters in support of project/or letters of commitment Other {Specify}: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification I certify that the statements and appiication requirements of this afficial pra- pasal are carrect and that this propasal contains no misrepresentaiion or falsi- ficaiians, omissions or concea3ment af material facts and that the informatian given is true and camplete to the best of my kna�vledge and belief, and that no bids have been awarded, contract executed, or constructian begun on ihe prapased project. Signature of Autharized Officiai Title � � � Date � Attachment A Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1988 City of Mendota Heights 4. Documentation in Support of Federal Objectives a. Benefit to Low and Moderate Income Persons The housing rehabilitation program will only be available to those households in Mendota Heights within 80� of the median income for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area. (See income limits listed below.) The program funds are only available for persons in this low and moderate income bracket who maintain owner-occupied, single family dwellings. Program benefit to this income group is 100$. Family Size 1 . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8+ INCOME LIMITS Loansl $13,500 - $21,300 $15,450 - $24,300 $17,350 - $27,350 $19,300 - $30,400 $20,850 - $32,300 $22,400 - $34,200 $23,950 - $36,100 $25,500 - $38,000 Deferred Loans� $13,500 $15,450 $17,350 $19,300 $20,850 $22,400 $23,950 $25,500 1 Households between these income ranges would be eligible for loans. � 2 Households below these incomes would be eligible for deferred loans. 1 � � Attachment A (con't) Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1988 City of Mendota Keights 5. General Description af �he Project a. Project Description The design of the �r�gram wi11 be a combiration of loans3 and deferred loans to awner-occupied, single-iamily homes. With a Cammunity Developmen� Black grant o� $35,pOQ, four {4) loans of $7,50Q would be available. Four (4) additional Ioans o� $7,5fl0 would be availabie through Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Hame Impravement Laan and Rehabilita�ion Laan Programs. Low-income househalds with incomes less than 5Q% a� the Metrapolitan Statistical Area (MSA) median incame (see Attachment A, page 1} will be eligible for deferred loans. Moderate-incame households with incomes be�ween 50� and 80� of the MSA median income who demonstrate adequate capacity ta repay �he loan, and give evidence of acceptable credit risk will be eligible for 3� low- interest rate loans. The maximum loan amount �or both deferred and 1ow-interest loans will be $15,000 with a maximum term of ten {10} years. Rehabilitation laans and deferred loans may only be used to improve the property by increasing the structure's energy efficiency, ar ta remove health, safety, or other de�iciencies and to bring the strueture inta compliance with the property rehabilitation standards used by the � The maximum loan available wauld be $15,000 far rehabilitatian. To secure the loan, a promissory nate for the terms and conditions agreed to and a mortgage deed shall be signed by all parties listed on the title of the praperty �o be improved. The mortgage shall be recorded with the County; copies oi all recorded �ocuments will be forwarded to �he homeowner. � The maximum deferred loan available would be $15,000 for rehabilitatian. If the property is sold, transferred, or no langer the principal residence af the applicant, all funds must be repaid. A repayment agreement stating these terms and conditions shaZl be �igned by all parties to the title of the property to be improved. This agreemen� shall be recorded with the County; capies of all recorded documents will be forG�arded to the applicant. 0 Attachment A (con't) Housing and Redevelopment Authority. These loans may also be used to modify or rehabilitate the housing unit to make it accessible for a handicapped or disabled member of the household. The improvements financed by these loans must be completed within nine (9) months from the date of the issuance of the Proceed to Work Order. Rehabilitation loans and deferred loans may not be used to finance freestanding or built-in kitchen appliances, landscaping, or work begun or completed before the date of the Proceed to Work Order. It is estimated that the funding of about $35,000 in CDBG dollars will allow the HR.A to leverage an additional $35,000 in Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Housing Rehabilitation Funds. MHFA Home Improvement Loans will be awarded to households, with incomes less than $27,000. The maximum loan amount will be $15,000 for fifteen (15) years with a variable interest rate of 3� - 9� depending on the households income. MHFA Rehabilitation Deferred Loans of up to $7,500 will � be granted to households with incomes less than $7,000. MHFA Local Participation Loans of up to $15,000 for a maximum of fifteen (15) years will be granted to households with incomes less than $31,500 at an interest rate of 9.75$. MHFA Home Energy Loans of up to $5,000 for a maximum of five (5) years will also be available with an interest rate of 8.78�. There is no income limit for this program. B. Project Need The need for housing rehabilitation in Mendota Heights has been moderate in the past. In Dakota County since 1976, 29 of the 795 (4�) total Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Loans and Community Development Block Grant loans have been awarded to the Mendota Heights area. Of the 45 households on the Dakota County HRA's waiting list for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Loans 4(9�) are residents of Mendota Heights. The current waiting list of Mendota Heights residents and previous experience with utilization of housing rehabilitation funds would seem to indicate a moderate need for additional housing rehabilitation funds in the community. 3 a C. Implementation a Attachment A (con't) The Dakota County HRA will act on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights in administering these funds. The HRA will provide the following staff functions: 1. Program advertising and outreach. 2. Loan intake and processing. 3. Housing inspections, work write-ups, bidding, wor�ing with contractors, and final inspections. ' 4. Program fund requisitions, record keeping, and auditing. 5. On-going loan servicing and program income accounting. � . 4 0 � b�M ..R �,�„� +. 0 k��`y,;� i . , �:�.,,. _ i� • � E�i .i. . . ,�:r= ;:.� �� "3'�.x ,,e;�,�� `�`��/��,r��' =' �j '� �_� F�%..% % -1 � Qy''�._ G"• � �� '�''''r is�; `�`'`�' � �� `9'�'.-...�. +.. ; `=�+E 't �] � `' �� S � r''` '� � w.' ��..,.T, „ � S�!-„� � ..�;,n � �� 'v �� =� ;-y ` � 1 S �� :� '^� � la�� 3r � C .✓ aa n� p � � � �t� C•� F ��.4 � /' ' `� ' R � `°�� ' �� :�.�' :� � �`� i Mw.�A.l�! ,1�, � � �1�� _ " �_- ' N �c ,ne Fb � .'� �,;; ;_ � �r � -c '' � 4: ' 'i� M /+�' , _ � � l =' `��- i `�;.'0 ':� � `�:,` �♦ � y '!•� '� � _ VNvF��^ ��,%N � +.o �" ^' �" � �,�:' �'� �'=� : / i.,�``��C. � ; ' , � /'� �;�,—._. � .••s. �' ,,, � Yj /' /' l ��fYp. \ N� � ��/5� ; r�`• 'o.�..` TJ''�� `.i ~� � '.- � a�_"'-� _ � \ � "�'�,�� ry!"�:;� �� .. �,.iy ! • 'T'��'-��.�,�' C %t�a'. , ` , � 4 w � � ; - _ n � =-.�:��'SL� ��%�;�.• "� �.`l.3•/ / �� :��: �i�. _ti7''.;;.'=`•=a 1 ;� M ��C�' .iT}' �.r -..;�..�•` �-�; �I �� OTA �Fi.E � Vi ,�1r.�:F.�, � D£FAH ^• � � t�•fr.� i,.�� us �A �fR h?u„N JN '..! ` ! t ;��u r�uc w�:M,OF,� ilr��ATi � ,y✓'�y.•t4� �" �'ts?�M� +� � ' `�'''i—t._.V a'° n _ �� t� ,,,,, ' 1981—�`" „?; � ��+ `��•+, �(.'r- -� . - �� ~-�,: �...m � � y , I I ' � � ��C� �� """'""'_=-oo I � �'""� __ '---o � � -.,.;-�� -... ��JJ�:I r • �� ,�` d � „, .:�- _ �xlyn P3tk . . • � � � �, F\ � �f° -�•.��_--T `.tounds ' ISnortview .t"`7 � VVNIT��Et�,R ' "h _ .• . � : ��.�r Ll ` j:.►: ..w.„,. I�` ,,,,� � _ View • .� Jd?*��kS ',,,,,�, .: �� '�'tif,�.*'_' .. ._ ` ST L�YJA r� �� f � � . + ` �-�' � : --- t � ” �� i 't+ � ' 1� ` '� rtcdtey o .._ Y�: ,�1' ,�y Nlhltr= ',"� GnANT�� `•�► •r�, v • . � Brooktyn j � :. - Arderi ' ' 8ear- ' Centcr - � , c�•: i r r ;,�1i5 ti'y.�'�j' 'r+• .� l,dK9 =� . cr ^'' � , � `�?} . � Vadna�s � ; •' II � • � � .�t ... ^,�. � Q >> _ ; � tqnts ... ^ - � �`= c' ... � �i, i Ls.+'. J � ^"Y G': •�, �„�. . .. ^ . . � � Q.. , f � .="*^-' � � � `f' � 'i.lii}2 �..+w�� ' � � N �— + .7.� � _�• - " vditdClB "� �' iVOtih Q 1 • j � �,,� ..-_ : �- .�i- ' _`.,.RoSEvii(� �t' � i► • �... ._ SL �~ " ^� . ��t�-'ti-�,,, �,`_,.�'t � ._ .=r>L- -'��' � �� , :.taaiewood P3ut }� .�!`?"r� BAYT{�Cj'�J� j a 1 t _.1 j • �'_„� ' ''� : �G '4� _ � � ' � 7 . Lake clma r '� Z � otCr'I Vaiiey ' ;l i �f• .:. -:�' � . _ s � y 1 � `''-^ �:. ':-: j;�k»'Z�-'�,i�,l',. •,� � ,�• � t } "� . • }, "—{ � � ...�,�,�._ _ ..- • . . ,,� .�� ..� _l.x. �r• ,-„�� 1'= WESiz; � �. � „�..M "� { • �.*5..:-�: t' ~ •t't:.+-' .��.:' ..'t ,+�j: � t;,..�,�, �:�..�i _ �._ . - _ ��-�--�;r: .�r, __ _ --. caK��,rvo � '. �� , �h �'�. :, - M'snneapoliss �. '� �^ r, •�-+. • .�_.t. . ti. •�o . . �, � ' LC�is Park .,,, �.-.,..� . '_:. ; I \ � .. " �' _� •.._...cj � '7'.%/�....:.-".�'.,.. � 3 � `- s ^ , e . . ' , . - : , -•� ; , . .. • �, ,a - .'"'�w.• , �".. • • 'r� �' s�� }�. �_� ; _. -r. : t • . r t_. � , .^r, ,: � `"""'�►a� � .� . f� ,.y y.�•_. . _—' 'i';':� ..;�'_.i�.• ' : ��"'� :� � . �: a ;1 'Tc='�'"\.�." � „'�! � y t C" � EL �.�a�-rr,_��_••• '"'•�"' .�7�--y�M1'� • :,' / +• S . •` �'.. _.z �,~�r,.�r ,... ,��s,f;°.�� ,-"`'^ � �`' �"��^ `? . �;� t 3': - g 1 , : �. ;. -, � .�,...-- - . �:., ��,' :. .. ��1C �� J . • ' � � � a • �� . . . `�. � 1 y t , i � ` �� • „ �~ � ! '—c-�;r.t''''"'.."�•4 .,t. ::�.��c West ►��\.�'; . �b oc4urys^1 �' ;t5��-� . l.,.� "'i` c_'�- ' .;� > Paui -� � � . � • =_ :{ � � r . %�.. „ : St. '�. } t, � - �� .+�'" t.�^dina ' •'' ''-r "=�' y .' South• �i:_:...�. ' _.,_� . ___ , -. `�5 : �� s - . • , �l' ` St. � ..r'_, ~� - • v ,t � 4 ! ' �.. ! Ri htield - - �� , .1� . • ? ' . � Paut ~ . . ..«T-. __ �r�, � ',.�� ` ' '� ' ' • h;endota Heights �� _ � � �-,.,, .� L. ._:'^�'.��r "';� i i.��r s .. `,� '.`� j ' ; .r' i �' • � , � � J ��C ''� SL L ' -- �i'' -,- �-� � �r` �''� � i • ; .""'_ - a: j��_ • 2 .~ r • 'b � 'G -• r ,:i .. : ; Paut � �` +� . :r .,..,-re.l•�' -a i -�"i 6t-t^"'; . ... .'_ �f �' ,�t_ 't'`„ P3rk �9 F. ,'Blocmin ton- • • r -�,,. ` ^r�-`. � s nver Grove _ t OE:Jth.,-�.s,� -- �'f/�: . - ' . + i • � n '"' " i . /''�� ., 3 _ -'' ,.� ' � :i►..��ag� 't'�'.'C, ; c,� ig Ss �.%. � •. _:Cott. gC�G�";'re . .,.,.r-:,:,: = � i . •,r+ `. �� :. _ � „� •'Zti •s �� T,•, .J � . tti''�•^ t • � ► f - � r . . . . . . .. , t�_ ... s'X � � :u. ��: b,,� {J . '. _ . - _ , Y ° � - �f Ct� 1, '.✓"~'t"t r' r � . I ,ti �r'�"� � � p�y i:'oTr'i S�." '� �„�t'� �-� • � +' � • r~ - t� Y` � •/`� ~• � •�s�`,= ,,} ix" } � � w/ r/ bI•; y ' _• r L � �,' q-'^I �c .! n i` r � ��r�',...••� � '�'.��.�. /"�`�"� � . "h `G,.+'� ��,f L:r '` �'Y��f�� ;'v�`.iYr'•r.rn^'r »''� . • �� 3 .{�"+,_' � �""�� ,.rr'"'!� + ' �. �� .a�• w"'�s� . r �'� � � �i,, �, .. .:.:i ti �� .t ' Sumsvifie� ,+ =7�� }''� �y� ' r'6a' r ,�, � ,t, *� , .""`,�`�'"^: ' �� y,� � Y„ • T , �. • r �-`.\ � `~ : �».. ! y . �`� '?. /�a�G�:�.- f'Sa�a'�e �"s'�'' �x c'� t F. � 1�, yr,- <F,.,.,,�•�.,.,�� " ;�,. �'"°�, + ( � � ;.,pp�e VaiiC�r�'l �, Rosemount .. ft•lG�:�i� � .'� . a - ` � �' . „., �-x.:s. y,� _ � ,� i._.. . ' '��. _. �� .,r► �_' _ � � �"p� _ , '.'' W` . '+ � �' � � ts-+ ~, � r _ .�.}iaSt ��lf;_�. . �T �""'', .. 'f �T ."_ r+. Y � �V%�. .� ='. '' �~�.i,�,''.._ ��3'�,` «�.i�c. ' � ' � 1' �:-',-� -- �, � •v"_ .. � ' ` - -f ' � M'` '�',.• � : 1� ��'-`�.�-..'c �_ � ��:.�. � ��,;- � `„r.;�,;� � ` � =- r L r . ^ L� � . • �i� �j �� y .Lt.�:.. , � �r _ . � . ; `�r� � 1 • },� � , i �. � _. � ..,_. � . ' .ar's:.�r ,._�� 1'x 3�� .,,,t i1-'� Vc= :i��t: �� ' - . ; ' RF,:/EN� . 4.�C=;��T ,,� •�akevine� -,r'� : � ' - - _- - MAR ri � ;:.. � G►�t?Ic;� # �r ). '„� J* t�{V ��' FtiV�; �' {��,�'j "��-�; • . s---- - � � r '� ' '' - • "" - ` , sI Ml� , �• `- St�' � V�. ' w�i`,�£ "aC�y�^-�+ -.. I , ' ":' ! d `•� ,,`\�\� � ..0 � •� � v � . �....r � '• � - +/ } ..y j'{�. - `�."_ 3-i "', _ •' ;,,:-. � �� i r 4 � - r • `� _ ... >"�-"""� •i- �' �,. -. " ) r� �� . - 4 • "n"'�"'� t_ •^, �,._. -'"= �.. .'.�.,. ~ ^"7 1' �- � � �'� ' - � 1 •' . } � � �� ` ��.,.—% � •�IIC�Z�'y,,.^'�_'�1�.._• .�3'i � �� ... ; �'�"?� �1 ' � .�,(y � � ~�• �:•:♦ i w.j---�� _ � �«' � �A ""' �� :.' :.'`; � .. , � , .. . t�.._ -" ----`, - c ;5 .' = . �.. ' ", • i �`-i1 � �, '' � :"' : i i' ; �c�� • ' i .�,� , •, fi '�:�• �,--�,.� . , `:-r_ - i . ; r�; .,� �' � +:a � � �`- ' � i ��y f .��'ai' ��-- 1 � .'"� '' y, ,. '. t , � --� �. / r f' � �+-� �'^ ' � x � 7 ,~..+ ' �,'+ • ,� .. f � � • �' +:' -✓ ,M �,7---,._, _,t •'�1 ['� '� �:`i'L kJ r' . , "1� tw . I* ' J' �f �1 . . ,,••. �,+. ,', : -. t . • �A, a ..� ,-t =o— Y1. • - 'fl��i. ."_ •� • .. • " "".,..',. _' '?iC,"j �.t,? � ' 1 � ,. =1�„�,�;a��irT • � =UFc::, +� . �:CnS i �C.?•.� ,N%•' � .L_ j .,._ . _� "�-' . r_- �. _ - �=' ".a�)� � .i. t �,/' �' `�� ' t ',i� � ' . .. ... •L �K � ,�`. 1'! .�+CiuuLrl�J • i, � . .i . �- [�' .t . �� `� ^'? �' :tt�' y�?+ � � t.r �. r. � � a ` 'tr r1� �� ♦ • • ^�4� �� t'. 1 .f / r�\. �. • � ��y ' .i .'~� .,� 'r'�• � � . 4� I � _ . ., y � r l � � `� t: .. r . . ♦ i \ . �. ...�!'[a � �.+. _ j�,,, ��}T •t-y. ,' � � ~i �. 1 ` -� '+' � -.,�..r.'✓ � : � �?�� , . i ..+� S., v i - f- t�- V _LA � `y.�. � " fi.- ''" � !' r�Ai�i�uLr`ci �� 5pring, 1973 .' � -��: � vr=` "•�-.`: ''�G�,ctii tvnLC,�'t. ', ^ �� `• �".'r•%7 ,,,� �i , _:..''''�'-;�' �` 3' �. ,' �`:'` j j%i •:,S ' =� ." I = �c� . : �". �.' �� . �.� `r� f_ J� � � � . � , � . . 1r: � . _r.`1' Decorah Lane 1 - MHFA Rehab Delaware Street 1 - MHFA Home Improvement Dodd Road 1 - MHFA Home Energy Fremont Avenue 1 - MHFA Rehab Furlong Avenue 1 - Mod Rehab Hilltop Road 1 - MHFA Home Energy Kirchner Avenue 1 - MHFA Home Improvement Knollwood Lane 1 - MHFA Home Energy Marie (West) 1 - MHFA Home Energy Pueblo Drive 1 - MHFA Home Energy Simard 1 - MHFA Home Energy Wagon Wheel Trail 1 - CD Deferred Loan Walsh Lane 2 - CD Deferred Loan 3rd Avenue 1 - MHFA Home Improvement Highway 55 1 - CD Deferred Loan � � MENDOTA HEIGHTS � MENDOTA HEIGHTS 7VV � 6W 5W 4W 3W 2W 1 W' ,,_ � MHFA Home Improvement , , , MHFA Rehab � - � - �. - . . ,?;; ' .� , - � � , - � ` '��` �.• . - � ,. � . . �. ��r . • ' .• . • . ` , .' . ;� - _� ;,. ' ' - ". ••'i� .- . .� "�� , �. MHFA Home Energy • � ';� ' ,. • - � �. . `t� • � ,� ., . , '::�� . . .. • •. - „� � ' �:�. , � CD Loan • � . , , - ', � ., : • �� .,, .� u � 3 . . � � � O � I � S�. y I! E. CD Deferred Loan ; , , • . � ' ', . o �" � � �i', . 1 � �Ma� Ma�;;o~ .� � a � �„ s�. • � , . r �• � ,, 4.�n ��. ��. � 'L. : r � 312 Loan � �_ ' � _ o a �. q� �;��., � . r .a,� ;� • •; r. i : 'w �...�. ,.�� . ,. r : : SI SI /q, g WR[4 � �, , � Bu ` (/ 1 ' 8. t}" �vLi � 'f . � � ; • � � ��{.� .o`� 1 ��4• d, �• S o 1 a r 6 a n k . .�':. , .� �1� � •�`«� ;;..� � ..� o : a. � �¢ � �.�,, � o ' 6'�� .,. . u� - a � +. R.. �✓��J 4� Iv.'"ru�s v[. Y4J d�p. �t. �� Rental Rehab . . . S � `�:a� ` d.,�,�.� �.'°�^ �•. ,�«„�,r � w:, � . �� ;.; ' lst ' : .n �i c' � / * � �`�o �"; i`i��` � cas� w� .vt. i� i � o '" � „ : Q �V'S nn. �.�a •.�. ..�. ' 3 . a s a � [w�sa rt' ,� u �'' . t. g �u�nsan 'mn. m•vr. • � �„ "&y yQ: i.�.vi.'S:: �,u � g ,,• + A n�ny, mu� a. uxuenn. 11 fIPY U�1 f Y w N .-+ 1M�� Vf. � � }4 naist�w u. Sf - �S g "a. ' �.r.nar� �rL• � . . ._ - «. ._..._.. �..... .-< - . t - � :. rn �vi r.c .oi� �.. �nowi �v[. : . ._ .I � d ,., ca w ryy �..i...r,. .rt. . . `• . . -. • �.n' ', <awtu � �am� Si w [. .�i...o ��. "" � : „ Q' � s.utxt•�ti. 'Mst[ ' i�. r ' • � ■ 61 Y V� M o`� w' Jg � � y i: L �..u.ciia u. / [�1 % �� p t � ,.,u« s�. � � y ,� . .� . �i � .��,.o��. �.�s��. �.. Q ir. , /��j//// .Y �q�9�N ��1 IS�U�nw+��a / ''v 1. a`1 � `y � ` o O �`� • • 7^;Y$ 'k, �9 .� ' 4` �wtis�� i,G�'* 011�/�� .0 . :' � � �� [v[MC��Ih i. rieL • , • , , •� , f;l � ';LI - r . :� .A ' �u. c,� �S a�o ew. qaa�"'�. . � aMals � a 5 . .�.0 � � �'� ',' � I FORT SNELLINC `'� 3 � � � � c�. e.c�c�w'E ��c � � .nury �+r� � ✓uicr �.. , . ' „ .ti..,;j:Y- • ,. STATE PARK y, � .+ ��, "q .7",a � ��. B J s� r �� FORT y �\ $NELLING • � ��", ' '� S�tu E�� " e � � wc �n� �a . ^ • � .• ' J � R��•� Ov[x�00a �0. I.IIICSU1vL /�IM ' �� STA7E � '.� ri,e. ., : ; ./ ` a�urn�[v � '� : d' g a�uiw[ vtn �• PARK . PIk9 IsIOnC . c� _ Y� �'4a v.n¢ M .vc. o �w¢ .K. _ ,nrt . J^'Eona.�o .,. € . �. e �T ''��:�w��.� . 55 / � e.ar. u. : ` � 7� uiu..w r•. J c,o ua�.g • ..u;�ecr Yy � qn. � ' q � �a � 'u6 � p ,d V �n• . . uac�. . :�d' � � �vw i � j � e�..p`!'> "ac � ar+��.. .ran . � . •n � �� s'• `� Q � ..cwni c� � �� wo. °pa � en. 4q � � .�w c v¢. cr. �� • ' d ` ,a ¢. ,r f. ao�x roix� w. y � a� K INLL�1� en. �•�p � � �' ' Y � � v[NOMIC� l�. v�l� � � Y ` f E � l`.C�N a / OfG 11W fll. �' � y�. y _ �� co ' Y ^°• r��.. r �o. °� : \ i'° "�''�• � .l(3i��au :vtr` ��o•" ,cno.a `�.. • s. nrn•` � f u�m� cr. . O � .1( ~ n �,a,.'� i �i w. �nouoc� �9� vtaont• xo....� ��. ,; cu. w,om On. no. �� r ou .o. Iw�n 'o. ' ��o rnont.c � Q • r .onc �w `. � . � ( . Y ! �wn��. iq .. 1 � tt.iu roai� '� r g s.o�.r� �'� � � 4 .�C+ 7ti1 i'iQlilfltS °�] n� ry Q� SS � � 7� � . • e, I i s ca[+ � 1Pe �..ia .ow�[ e�. � I :.sro.c �. � � [<k. 1 cw[r y Y.. `. f `Nn f� xcrovcaru�o on. ' , .cui. eiva ,�,�,.,m < <. � ..or.a� S � � �.xiW rowrz �o. b Ld�. �•, .�a� 8 s.a.a etx[ ati ' , ' QPQ� \ � .ic�a. .n. �.rou rnHe aw. � V �o..h ..i. cy. : � LIAI[N �Y[. y DA. • Y � _ i � y +� � * S ' 1. '1� .[�.. .+�' runow .rc .�:Y ..cw .Kn _ j P Y � Y y S r4` �. � - � 4ti O .cwooM •v�. Y � �in. � � �^',�� 4 �?" a^ r. `y.: � u.�ri�. - Q .. � • ,�.� i /(�Y/Y/ �a, /�, ," @ .,�. t.mer a�e� . .�o. ` '•3 v V , o^ e. •'�Y � �, awen� w. � . 4t � � J��4 Gun G! Rq�.� Lo4r Y S' Y �� Y � 1 . � ��cV 1� S 1! � S � � ' S ui ou. � � �� aS'�< t �raM i .�� ' �. r•� r� Q �.�'�' 2 vtxnax xo. � [�+. • N �M ` � g • �� . �r „��u,i�•iin �'y+ r y'2' . [nrtnrN� R 'e € � :� si. ' �/ a ��ta��D V • •� • �� Q� J _ s� G '�ti�o• �aouua ou. � • d 8 pt�' ~ r4` � , ..� _ ... . , S } � 4�-' ^ '- • V - - .c'oe'�-- a ' r Kiars : $ no. � �ty S+ � i - v'^�-° p g g} j" �u � t. / � Y'� 11 wa.n.w w. 5 / cd J� � rwwnw i�nw � /� r .owvn. n. /i "'.�•-.ti-.-..�.._'_��. �nuunuwu /� �� ' � +. .' ' • ""' �"". �11 \'i i, ~ ( n�� .... n �. ._�� _ . ... •'- � GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � DECEMBER 10, 1987 " TO: Mayor, City Council and City ��.�istrator � FROM: �Paul R. Berg, Cade Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: 5ign Permit Application, 1960 Dadd Road � {FINA Gas Station} DISCUSSION: � Suburban Lighting, Ina., has made application to install twa new signs at the FSNA station at 1960 Dodd Roaci. This station was owned;by Texaca and FINA has bought out same 30 Texaco statians in the metro area. FINA has hi.red Suburban Lighting to install a 3' x 30' (90 square foot) FINA sign on the building and a�.0' x 5� (50 square foot� FINA sign and gas prices on the existing pylon pole (see attached drawings). Council may recall that this site was at ane time Sur�co, Getty, Texaco and now FINA. Each time the awner has changed, sign permits were granted by the City Council to accammodate oil company name changes. Suburban Lighting has always been the sign cantractor for this site. The existing pylon will be reduced in square faotage from the present 72 square feet to 50 square ieet. Bob Sherlock �rom Suburban Lighting was in ta meet with Planner Dahlgren and staff about the sign permit request. Upon completion of our discussion with him, it was determa.ned that these signs are in compliance with zoning ordinance requirements. In the case of the pylon, �his has been approved for changing sign information three times in the past 5-6 years. � RECOMMENDATSON: Staff and Planner the two FINA signs as ACTIdN REQUIRED: Dahlgren recommend Cauncil approval af requested. If Council wishes to implement staff and Planner Dahlgren's recammendation �to approve the sign permits, it should pass a motion adopting staff's recammendation. PRB:madlr attachments r, � :; 0 I�ATL��YF�� H(Vi�lOf/ �I[�:tiND ' �- - -- - � . l�_.__t _ �'- I n" 5' - 0'� � :i'- 0" ' -----.._ -__ . _ _--.-- . ^ — ' . �, �� 2 � � f ;I�LO f I��I�f {-�- ` . ' � - _ - --- - —_ _ — ......:. - _.. -� - c cn c_ � cn - ' � �_ -' � Sti' N n ;�' u� � ]. �� #�� {� - � � ^ t� ��' � 1`•� _ �� j r7 c n _, �: t�. a � -q ^� �='`� t,7 -A i .�. � �� 1 � r� t �%�"� � n ii1 ( l7 f] Cl �) �.�, �`� I � ' ,_ _,. _ ��, � o o � � �n_� ��-y �; ___.__ __ �� _� _ . . , _. � � �_ �� -� .__._� �._J ��/� �" f�L'. �� crn (�7 ��(+c�� _ - - ______._ ._._ �r �-1-i � -i�==- =�— �-1 1 � � I-�I c� , � 2 -n .!� .� � u . _ ., L -- D N � �.- in To�_crc�ricEs ��,/� SC(��EN G��P{-iICS I�1C. ��Ncc►t w■ Hor�o� ��f..�.lV IUY �� 3� V.J./-cJCJVC7 ❑tCIMAL o�:AL� UAnws� �Y ^ ^O��' rt � 3/a'�=J�� wrrtiuv�u rr 1NAGilur�nl- . ��irr��cn�_ r-�ir��,�zY sic-�,�� t�-�ur�_c �,�,c�� 'x �� "s ,�� .�, n�,� �„�..�,�„�. �.��.��„ ' �:.... s�. .r.r � � �. ` � � . ir�t � � �.. � +� � . ��" __.,� ._ �.. ....�i.,r;��,� � 1 i _� Z , � �11�'f I`�� l , • �. . 7� s�c%�'cN 13 �'8� � 96� MIN. STRIPE gq � ALL WFi'fE FlLLER AFTER � 4��8■ �� 168° MAX. STPoPE �� REApiNG MAX. STRIF£ � �r � � �� } I �� 0/%IB� '�TI%"CiYP.1 � i .� � e 4 �/g' � �4 7/8• 2■ l..— I �� —.J �103/g� MW. SPACaVG AT END CF CANOPY. ::-�--=—�'- 24" CANOPY GRAPHICS "Y^.._ __________��, ---- �- � 4 --�---��--�_— .•'' 6��er I20 �2 {44" MIN. STRIPE '� 3/4" AlL WHRE FIILER AFTER' REACMNG - `1:��} � ,1 � � 20' 252" MAX. STRIPE I MAX. OF STRIPING I i 36� 2 �4x I - .':RER.:�_r.%.. :. •: �•i�:,. _ - - �" ' � '' ��D = � " " I / I TYE I 3 � �J� - � � ��if_I -; �� 4 , „ : , I� I ,- 1 r 76 ��8r T'�i �/q� � 3 . �f � r !• 6/g i I �5 �/Z MW. SPACING AT END OF CANOPY..�,,.-°' �'''b�,_ 36" CANOPY GRAPHICS ��"''` r 1 2T �/q_'.�-,..,r..--�-� ..�-.._.�-,-....a-,.__ _._ ,_.. s...,_� 192"�. MIN. STRtP�,�..T.,o-,.�._--�. ___�._�-- .._.�__ --- 6g "sj8� ALL WHITE FILLER AFTER e�� I_ I 336" MAX. STRIPE REACHING MAX. STRIPING � ' 20' �� `� :^"�. �...y.��^o-�� _ '•':i : .. ,�, -� �L_/ ��U� ! 5 8 1 2 3 8 fl'YP) .;a..,.;� , � '1c�3�e;,X.�"'.: r 14 / / � I -4--- ^ BIUE • �� J4 5�g„�� u �e �• „ I 10� 3�8r i�95/8 ° I� u � ��p 5j8 MN. SPACING AT END CF ,'�6 ^ 48�� CANOPY GRAPHICS � CANOPY. TOLER�NCES �� screen graphlcs, Inc. ��.o��. if�CE�l�yrqTEDi b�`.+�BINGIERD • HOUSTON.TX77092 • 71�-890�6E66 P O BO%+�65 • MOUSTON TX Tl10 OEC�MAL MATERIAL SGALE DMWNBY R.C�ITI ■ PRESStF� SENSITIVE �/Q" c �� APPROVED V � .0625 VRJYL GRAPHICS .1KS FRACT�ONA� TITLE �� Z� �� p �� V�+ 24 � JV ��t� CANOPY F!-LSCIA GRAPHICS ♦NGIiLAR pATE DAAWING NUMBER °F�� "p' ITEM COOE DATE SVMB REVISION RECORD OR APS : I� �- �o�� I GRS — CFl OTY DESCRIPTION ,.oE copt MA7ERIAL LIST REVISIUN BLOCK TITLE BLOCK N 9/� %�07if� /�'rX� �� h� '�� Dl��7T��/j' , � . 5xor � �° � �r��1s�'`� � a� � 2� . � N�i� �`�� s�d��d �ry � 7,f>/J �G✓��' �H1 C '�� O �� 1 , , �C /� � iV%r/ � :�7�1S�I �� O11 �-., ---�--- _�--� BUILD►NG lq'f11GM � . .�.��: %�µ =5�: \ .. \ \ � � \ - � ' \ � \ \ � � � � \ \ \ \ \ �: , � �� \ L� � --- -� C2' 4`s6r-�� F�l GEADlN6 ELI� oF s�c,�v. - ODD,O �PD, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 8, 1987 TO: Mayor, City Council, and Cit�.�d�ii i�trator FROM: John P. Mac �f�Y�`e Chief SUBJECT: Purchase f Portable Radios HISTORY Throughout the last couple of years, the City has been involved in purchasing new mobile radios, pagers, and base stations in a join�t effort with the City of West St. Paul, under the direction of Dr. John Dubois. The project, for the most part, is now complete with one exception. It has recently come to my attention that our old portable radios that were to be converted to the new system can not be converted. Therefore, we need to purchase new portable radios. . DISCUSSION The new radio system operates on several different radio channels and two different tone frequencies. In a radio, the tone is similar to a telephone number, only radios that have the same tone frequency can talk to each other. The reason that a multiple tone system was choses was to allow the dispatchers to tune into only Mendota Heights and West St. Paul radio units when we are operating on the fire channel. Under current policy, the fire departments in both cities operate off the same channel as the police departments in both cities. This channel is the new channel that was installed with a repeater to clear up radio transmission problems that were occurring in both cities. The current policy of our department is to change to the old fire channel when we get to a scene that is going to require more than a minimal amount of radio traffic that is not critical to any other department except ours, such as conducting fireground operation and tactics. This policy was developed so that the repeater channel could be freed up to the other three departments for emergency operations. Both police departments concur that this policy should be followed whenever possible. Currently the department owns five Wilson brand, six- channel radios that o�erate on three of the six channels. These radios are carried on each of the main pieces of fire apparatus and are used by entry personnel in fireground and rescue operations. As part of the radio project, Dr. Dubois stated that our portable radios could be upgraded to the new system with three additional channels added relatively inexpensively. The additional channels were needed to allow us ta cammunicate with Inver Grove Heights, Eagan, and a fire ground operation chanriel, aIl of whiah are needed in mutual aid situations. ' Two weeks ago, the portable radios were given to GenComm Electronics to have the work dane. Mr. Bill Schmidt, of GenComm, has informed me that the old radios could be re- crystalled to have either the new repeater channel that was installed, or the old fire channel, but not both. This is because the old radios are not capable of multiple tane , programming, Mr. Schmidt alsa infarmed me that it would be relatively expensive to install crystals to obtain the additianal channels when aompared to the cost of the newer radios. Since the department ztself works off two different radio channels and the additional channels are needed when working with other departments on mutual aid inaidents, we cannot af�ord to have radios that are not capabie of operating on all channels. ' Due ta the fact that we were anticipating s�ending a minimaZ amount af maney ta make the existing rad�as compatible, there was no money budgeted in either the 1987 or 1988 capital budget requests. I have received�a quotation from Mr. Chuck Maas, of Gommunicatians C�nter, on the purchase a� six King portable radios. The sixth radio would be carried on the new �umper {thi� radio was to be purchased out of aur 1988 operating budgetj. The King radios that were quoted are the same radio� that were purchased by both police and fire departmants eariier in the year on the Hennepin : County consortium bid.. The Hennepin bid is still open � through the end of the year. The quoted price is for $756.89 each, bringing the total funds needed ta $�,541.34. RECOMMENDATION It is my recommendation that we purchase replacement. radios for the radias that ware to be re-crystailed •and also the additional radio for the new pumper so that �ireground o�erations will not be jeopardized due to lack �f radias.; City Treasurer Larry Shau�hnessy recommends adding the � expenditure to the 1987 Fire Department budget. � ACTION RE4UIRED ' If Cauncil a�rees with the above recommendation, they should pass a motion authorizing purchase of six King portable radios from Cammunicatians Center under the Hennepin County consortium bid, and reappropriate $4,541.34 from General Fund balance to the Fire Department Capital Outlay line item. - JPM:madlr MENDOTA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPAR,TMENT MEMOI�.ANDUM DATE: 9 December,1987 TO: Mayor and City Council City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police� SUBJECT: Citation AuthoritY For Certain City Emplovees INTRODUCTION In an attempt to more clearly define the duties and authority of Peace Officers in Minnesota, the Legislature has passed a law requiring city, councils to specifically authorize anyone other than a full-time, licensed Peace Officer to issue citations. • At the present time, our police officers are the only city employees that are authorized to issue citations. This results in court cases where the complainant is not the best available witness. A police officer who issues a ticket for a violation of the Zoning Ordinance is a bit out of his/her element. This arrangement also deprives the Code Enforcement O�cer of the full authority to effectively discharge his duties. A citation, as referred to in this statute, is what we normally call an Ordinance Summons. It is a "ticket" issued for a violation of an Ordinance that regulates something other than traffic. It is a method of reporting a violation to the court and "invites" the accused to appear, at a given time, to respond to the charge. If the accused fails to appear, or specifically requests it, a more complete and detailed complaint is drawn up by the City Attorney and sworn, by the complainant, before a judge. DISCUSSION The Fire Chief, Fire Marshal, and Code Enforcement officers are the appropriate complainants in matters that pertain to their areas of expertise. Their effectiveness is also enhanced by the specific authority to issue citations for violations of certain Ordinances. In the case of the Public Works Superintendent, our "snowbird" Ordinance allows him to remove vehicles that are in violation, but does not allow him to issue a citation for that same violation. For him to do a good job of clearing the Citation Authority ........ Page 2 snow, violators must be dealt with, particularly repeat violators. At the present time he must stop his operation, call for a squad car, and wait until the squad arrives and handles the problem. Obviously, this�can be a tiresome task when there are many illegally parked cars on the street after a heavy snowfall. �ECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Ordinances granting the outlined authority to the involved individuals. Adopt the attached Ordinances amending Ordinances 101 (Establishment and Regulation of Fire Department), 219 (Codified as 1101, Motor Vehicle Ordinance), and 401 (Zoning Ordinance), authorizing the City Fire Chief, Fire Marshal, Code Enforcement Officer and Public Works Superintendent to issue citations in certain instances. � :; .. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 219 (Codified as Ordinance No. 1101) The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: SECTION l. Ordinance No. 1101, entitled "AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC," is hereby amended by the addition of the following paragraph to Section 4: 4.14(4) The City Public Works Superintendent is authorized to issue citations for violations of Section 4.14 of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk F Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA CaUNTY� MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N(7. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 401 The City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Heights, Mi.nnesota, ordains as fol,lows: SECTION l. Ordinance Na. 401, entitled "THE ZONING ORDINANCE QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS," is hereby amended by the addition of the following paragraph to Sec�ion 5.10: 5.10(2) The City Cade Enforcement Offi.cer is hereby autharized ta issue citations for vialations of or refusal to comply with the provi�ions o�' the Zoning Ordinance. SECTICiN 2. This 4rdinarzce shall. be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 101 The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 101, entitled "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHING OF A VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MAKING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SAME," is hereby amended by the addition of the following paragraph to Section 13: 13.2 The fire chief and fire marshal are authorized to issue citations for violations of the State Fire Code and City Ordinances that relate to fire suppression, prevention or safety. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its publication according to law. Enacted and ordained into an ordinance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk e Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor t E 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANGE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PART 5 OF THE CITY CODE (BUILDINGS) The City Cauncii af the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordain� as fo].low�: SECTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 501, entitled "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF BUILDINGS WITHIN TI-IE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTSj" Ordinance Na. 502, "AN ORDINANGE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CdDE, PROVIDING FtJR ITS ENFORCEMENT AND REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATIQN, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, CONVERSION, DEMOLITION, OCCUPANCY AND MA.INTENANCE OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURES AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS," and Ordinance No. 503,"AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SWIMMING POOL CQNSTRUCTION," are hereby amended by the addition of the �'ollowing paragraph as the final sectzon in each af said ardinanGes: " The City Code En£orcement Officer is hereby authorized to issue citations far violations o�' or re�usal. to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance." SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in �ull force and effect - � from and after its publication according ta law. Enacted and ordained into an ord3.nance this Fifteenth day of December, 1987. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk Charles E. Mertensotto Mayar Q 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 10, 1987 i TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: � Kevin ,,,��e�l, City Administrator ; � SUBJECT: Upcominc� Appointments to the Planning & Parks . Commissions � � Two positions on each of the Commissions expire at the end of January, 1988. �In addition, I understand that Marsha Knittig intends to submit a letter of resignation to the Council from her position on the Parks Commission. Therefore, Council.will need to make five appointments and/or reappointments at its second meeting in January. � The expiring terms are as follows: I NAME APPOINTED Jerry Morson (PLANNING) 7-20-82 Dorothy McMonigal " 2-1-85 I Bev Lachenmayer (PARKS) • 10-21-86 ' Carol Damberg ," 5-21-85 As you can see, all except Jerry Morson have completed only one term of office. We currently have on file the following applications for appointment, which were previously submitted to the City: Judi McArdle and John Huber for Parks Commission. Charles Banc�asser, Paul Katz, and Robert Emery for Planning Commission. Darrell Str.aumann is interested in either Commission. ACTION REQUIRED: Council should give staff whatever direction it wishes in soliciting applicants for appointments to the Planning and Parks'Commission. cc: Planning & Parks Commissions � MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS December 7, 1987 To: ; Mayor and City Council From:; Kevin��, City Administrator Re: � 1988 Salaries and Benefits for Non-Organized Employees INTRODUCTION Attached are two resolutions necessary to implement 1988 cost-of-living pay and benefit increases for em�loyees not covered by a labor contract. The purpose of this memo is to briefly describe the contents of those resolutions. PAY MATRIX The first attached resolution adopts an amended pay matrix for 1988, increasing all figures by 4�`. I am recommendirig a 4� adjustment, based on trends in the Consumer Price Index, running in the 4- 5� range, and on salary trends in other metropolitan area suburbs for clerical, professional, and managerial groups. • Council adopted a revised pay matrix last August 1, to implement the requirements of the comparable worth law, and will recall that we are phasing in comparable worth adjustments over a three-step process. Al1 employees below Step C were moved to that step on August 1, 1987. They will be eligible to move to Step D on August 1, 1988, and to Step E, the final adjustment, on August 1, 1989. However, the current action before Council is to merely adjust the pay matrix in recognition of cost-of-living: The second step of pay equity implementation, moving salaries to Step D, will occur , next summer . INDIVIDUAL SALARY ADJUSTMENT5 The second attached resolution sets forth a schedule of individual 1988 salaries for employees not covered by a labor contract. All adjustments, except for that of City Administrator, are 4� over what the emplo}�ee is earning for 1987.! The salary for City Administrator is as discussed with Council on December 1st. Employees whose salaries don't fit exact steps on the matrix as discussed above are either in a temporary "in between" status on the way to full �. ^ implementation of comparable worth. The two part-time positions of Fire Chief and Assistant Fire Chief are extended a 15� increase, based on the number of hours they are putting in on the job. This is as was discussed with Council during budc�et review this Fall. The hourly schedule for firefighters is increased $.25 for each class. This is as recommended by Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmember Cummins, and I, after meeting with the Firemen's Compensation Committee; we declined to recommend an increase in the level of City contribution to the pension program, as originally requested by the firefighters. � INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION The resolution increases the City's maximum contribution for each employee's insurance program by $10, to $185 per month. MedCenters Health Plan, the program used by most employees, is increasing their monthly rate from $197.30 in 1987 to $224.90 in 1988. Therefore,'even with a City contribution increase of $10 per month, employees will see an increase of $27.60 in their own monthly deduction for insurance. $185 is the amount already set in the second year (1988) of the , public works contract. BUDGET IMPACT The cost of the salary increases, compounded by variable fringe benefits (i.e. FICA, PERA, etc.) is approximately $27,600. The cost of the insurance increase is $2,400. Adequate funds are included in the 1988 budget adopted by Council. CA TION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the 1988 salary and benefits changes as outlined and recommended above, it should pass a motion adopting each of the two attached resolutions. 0 r� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87 - RESOLUTION AMENDING PAY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE FOR NON-ORGANIZED EMPLOYEES TO REFLECT A 4� ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FOR 1988 WHEREAS, by Resolution 87-67, the City Council has adopted a grade-and-step pay system for non-organized city employees that meets the requirements of MSA 471.991, the Pay Equity Act; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to annually review the,pay matrix that is a part of that system for adjustment in recognition of increases in cost of living; and WHEREAS, based on salary trends in the metropolitan area suburbs, and budc�eted funds available, a 4� adjustment in the matrix for 1988 is reasonable. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the Grade and Step Pay Matrix attached hereto as Appendix A, is hereby adopted as Appendix A of Resolution No. 87-67, adopted by the City Council on July 7th, 1987. ATTEST: Ka een M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By C ar es E. Mer enso 0 Mayor . � CItY OF MEHD07a HESGNTS, MINNESBTA EMPLOYEE POSITION PLACEMENT RND PdY CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE RESOLUiION N8. 87- , ATTACHMENT A GRAdE - A B C D E* F G i Cterk-Receptianist 15,344 16,117 '16,923 17,7b9 18,657 19,540 20,570 II 15,733 16,520 77,346 18,213 19,124 20,p80 21,08t► III 16,126 16,933 17,774 18,668 19,602 20,582 21,611 IV 1b,530 17,356 98,224 'l4,135 20,442 2i,09d 22,151 V 16,9k3 17,790 18,679 19,613 20,594 21,624 22,705 Vt 17,366 18,235 14,446 20,1Q4 21,t09 22,164 23,273 VII 17,801 18,691 19,625 20,606 21,637 22,719 23,854 VIII 18,246 19,158 20,116 21,12z 22,178 23,28b 24,451 IX Secretary 18,702 19,637 20,619 21,650 22,732 23,$b9 25,062 X � 14,169 20,128 21,134 22,391 23,300 24,465 25,689 X[ Seniar Secretary 19,648 20,631 21,662 22,746 23,883 25,077 26,331 XFI 20,9G0 21,147 22,204 23,314 24,480 25,704 26,484 XIII 20,b43 21,675 22,754 23,897 25,092 26,347 27,664 XIV 21,154 22,217 23,328 24,494 25,719 27,005 28,355 XV . 21�6$8 22�7T3 23,911 25�107 26�362 27�680 29�Ob4 ' XVi Accauntant, Engineering Technician 22,230 23,342 24,509 25,735 27,421 28,372 24,741 XVII 22,786 23,926 25,122 26,378 27,69? 29,482 30,536 XVIti 23,356 24,524 25,750 27,037 28,389 29,809 31,299 � XIX 23,948 2S,137 2b,344 27,713 29,099 30,554 32,0$2 XX 24,538 25,765 27,053 28,406 29,826 31,318 32,884 XXI 25,152 26,409 27,T30 29,116 30,572 32,101 33,70b XXtt 25,781 27,070 28,423 24,844 31,336 32,903 34,548 XXItI 2b,G25 2?,74b 29,134 30,540 32,120 33,72d 35,�+12 XXIV Sr. Engrg Tech, Cade Enf Off, Engineer 27,086 28,440 29,&52 31,355 32,923 34,569 36,297 X7{V 27,7b3 24,i53 34,b08 32,134 33,74b 35,433 37,205 XXVI 28,45T 29,880 31,374 32,442 34,589 36,319 38,135 XXVII 24�1b8 30,b27 32,158 33,76b 35,454 37,227 39,088 XXVIII 29,897 31,392 32,9d2 34,610 36,341 38,158 40,065 XXIX 3d,645 32,177 33,786 3S,475. 37,249 39,132 41,Ob7 XXX Public 4lorks Supervisor 31,411 32,982 34,631 3fi,362 38,180 40,089 G2,094 XXXI Sergeant 32,14b 33,806 35,49b 3T,271 39,135 �.1,042 43,146 XXXII 33,p01 34,651 36,384 38,203 40,113 42,119 44,225 XXXIII 33,82b 35,518 37,243 34,158 41,11b 43,372 45,330 XXX1V 34,672 36,406 38,226 40,13T 42,144 44,251 46,464 XXXV Police Chief, P.W. Director,City Clerk 35,539 37,316 39,181 41,141 43,198 45,357 47,625 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES FOR 1988 AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN OTHER BENEFITS WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a grade-and-step pay system for certain full-time employees of the City; and WHEREAS, based upon recommendation of the City Administrator, Council has determined the appropriate placement of each City position on a Grade, and the incumbent employee on a Step; and WHEREAS, it is also necessary to set salaries for certain part-time employees, as well as fringe benefits for full-time employees. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following, schedule of salaries be implemented effective January 1, 1988, for full-time employees: Employee Nancy Platz Rebecca Birch Kimberlee Blaeser Carol Bakka � Diane Ward Mary Ann DeLaRosa Shirley Shannon Guy Kullander Klayton Eckles Tom Knuth Richard Gill Paul Berg Tom Olund Larrie Mack Donn Anderson Dorance Wicks Kathleen Swanson Dennis Delmont James Danielson Kevin Frazell Position Clerk/Receptionist Clerk/Receptionist Secretary Secretary Secretary Senior Secretary Accountant Engineering Technician Civil Engineer I Sr. Engineering Technician Code Enforcement Officer Code Enforcement Officer Public Works Superintendent Police Sergeant Police Sergeant Police Sergeant City Clerk Police Chief Public Works Director City Administrator 5alarv $16,117 16,117 19,637 20,619 20,619 22,666 24,509 27,550 29,862 31,892 28,440 31,892 36,920 37,523 38,766 38,766 39,181 44,877 44,877 48,000 2. That the follawing schedule of salaries be implement�+d ef�'ective sanuary 1, 1988 for part-time employees: Employee Position Salarv John Maczko Fire Chief $ 6,000 Bil1 Lerbs Assit. Fire Chief 3,600 Charle� Whelan Eng. Technician $9.88/hr Gregg Gund Eng. Technician $9.88jhr 3. That the foilowing hourly rate of pay for valunteer firefighters be implemented effective January 1, 1988: Q - 1 years $b.25 1 - 5 years 6.75 5 years and aver 7.25 Captain 7.75 , 4. That the City's maximum contributian toward in�urance premiums for full-time emplayees nat cavered by a labor contract shall be $185 per month for 1988. Adapted by the City Cauncil o£ the City of Mendo�.a Heights this 15th day of December, 1987. CiTY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charies Mertensotta; Mayor ATTEST: Ka�.hleen M. Swanson City Clerk a r o� _, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 10, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council, City ��s�_rator � � FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Victoria Highlands Assessment Deferments INFORMATION The property currently being platted as Victoria Highlands, more commonly known as the McCloud/Allstrom property, has been affected by several improvement projects in the past. The McCloud family had no desire to develop the property, and requested and was granted approval of significant deferments for sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street improvements. The McClouds transfered half ownership of their portion of the property to the Wilder Foundation a number of years aqo, and Council approved the continuation of the deferments notwithstandirig the change in ownership. .Since the total property has now changed hands and is in the process of being developed, the City must address the collection of deferments and accrued interest. DISCUSSION An assessment search was prepared and submitted to the developers prior to their acquisition of the property. The search reflected principal deferments totalling $80,664.39, and accrued interest amounting to $69,357.86. The statute governing deferred assessments provides that the option to defer payment of special assessments terminates and all amounts accummulated plus applicable interest become payable upon the sale or development of the property. Reference was made in the developers agreement to a requirement for payment of $150,022.25 at the time of plat execution. After reviewing the draft agreement, the developers contacted us in the hope of spreading payment of the amount due over a period of time. We then reviewed the information from the cards on which the deferment records were recorded and determined that, since two of the projects (Improvement 73-2 and 77-9) still have a number of years remaininc� to be collected, $31,075.21 of principal must be levied, either by adoption of a new assessment roll, or by folding that amount into the new project. The immediate cash outlay to the developer would thus be reduced to $119,447.04. Because of the significant dollars involved, I decided to'research the original assessment rolls before preparing a written response to the developers. This research uncovered an omission in the assessment search. �The assessment roll from which the deferment cards were evidently prepared showed that an assessment had been levied for Marie Avenue street improvements. To the adopted assessment roll was attached the original draft of the roll, which indicated that, while the property had been assessed $5,625 for street improvements, it was to have been assessed significantly more than the adopted roll reflected. There was no notation on either the original or draft roll that-deferment , consideration had been given, nor was there a resolution of deferment. Research of Council minutes confirmed that $16,875 in street assessments had been deferred but the deferment had not been recorded in the adopted roll. $12,252.60 in interest has accrued on the original street assessment deferment since adoption of the assessment roll. I had originally informed the developers that their � request for a variance from past policy over payment of the deferments should more appropriately be directed to the Council. Because the assessment search was in error to the extent of an unanticipated $29,130 liabilit� to the � developer, I felt obligated to try to negotiate some type of compromise over payment of amounts due. They have agreed not to contest the additional $29,130 and in consideration thereof, have asked that their cash outlay at the time of plat execution be limited to outstanding accrued interest�and the principal amount of the street assessment, a total of' $98,485.46. The� have further asked that the total amount of assessment principal for utilities, $80,664.39 (which includes the $31,075.21 referred to in the second paragraph of this discussion),�be included within the new�assessment roll. If the devel'opers' request is approved, the $80,664.39 could be added to the new pro�ect's construction costs and assessed against each of the new lots; that amount could then be added to the project costs for bonding purposes, and when bonding occurs a transfer would be made to the funds which financed the original improvement projects. ALTERNATIVES There are alternatives which could be considered: 1. Approve the request of the developer and ; .•absorb $80,664.39 in deferred assessment � principal into the new project. 2. Deny the request, conduct a public hearing to assess the $31,075.21 in deferred assessment' principal not currently due and require cash' paxment of $148,074.64 in deferred assessment principal and accrued interest at the time of final plat execution. 3. Al1ow phased payment of the $148,074.64 as had originally been requested by the developer. If either of the second alternatives is considered, it must be recognized that $29,127.60 of the amount was unanticapted costs to the developer. i RECOMMENDATION I recommend ap�roval the first alternative, subject to the developer agreeing to submitting a cash payment of $98,485.46 at final plat execution as payment of Marie Avenue street improvements and accreed interest on all deferred assessments. I do not believe that Council would be setting a precedent should it exercise the recommendation. Council has the right by statute to find that a hardship exists in � the payment of the deferred principal: this is by far the largest assessment deferment collectible to date, and it- includes nearly $30,000 in unanticipated cash outlay which the developer has,accepted and agreed not to dispute. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should authorize the inclusion of $80,664.39 in deferred assessment principal in the Victoria Highlands improvement project costs and direct staff to prepare a revised developers agreement. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 8, 1987 TO: Mayor and City o cil FROM: Kevin D. �City Administrator � SUBJECT: Update on TH 55'Corridor Study City Planner Howard Dahlgren and I are meeting with officials and planners for Resurrection Cemetery on Monday afternoon, to discuss their long-ran�e plans for the unplatted cemetery propertx, and their interest in working with the City in redeveloping in the Furlong area. For the Tuesday night add-on agenda, staff will prepare a brief outline of how we propose to proceed with the Highway 55 area redevelopment effort. If Council concurs with that direction, we can then invite the residents back for an update session early next year, and begin working toward accomplishment of our plans. KDF:madlr 1 c CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO December 11, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Klayton H. Eckles Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Feasibility Report Victoria Highlands Job No. 8714 Improvement No. 87, Project No. 7 DISCUSSION The Victoria Highlands development consists of 38 single family lots, 32 townhome units,.and a city park. The project is scheduled for Spring grading and utility construction. Installation of Sewer, Water, Storm, and Street utilities is necessary as part of this project; each utility is'discussed separately below, followed by a discussion of the assessments. Sanitarv Sewer The attached Drawing No. 1 shows the proposed layout of the city utilities. Sanitary sewer will serve the townhomes via Marie Avenue, and the single family homes via Diane Road. Note that all costs associated with serving the townhomes will be separated from the costs to serve the single family homes, and all assessments likewise will be separated. The cost of serving the townhomes with sanitary sewer will be approximately $64,950, The cost to serve the 38 single family lots will be approximately $98,690 $2,597 per lot. Watermain The townhomes and single family lots will be served by separate water extensions (as shown on the drawing). The cost of serving the townhomes will be $88,090. The single family lots will be served with city water for a total cost of $110,590. Storm Sewer There are several different portions of storm sewer (See Drawing No. 2). One portion (Part A) serves the townhomes only. Another (Part B) serves the single family lots only. A third part serves both the townhomes and the single family lots, and drains the park as well (Part C) . ; !',�71��[�7j1 Townhome� {Part Aj S.F. Lots (Part B) Comman portion (Part C) TOTAL DEVELOPMENT ST4RM SEWER COST $30�940 $39,910 $51,430 $122,280 In addition to these storm sewer casts there are other starm costs possible for an upgrade af a presen� system. When the Marie and Burraw pond were designed �'or �torm water retentian, a storm water li�t stata.on was installed to keep the level of Marie Park Pand fram floading the adjacent homes. However, the liit station was in�talled as a temporary salu�ion until the McCloud property, now under consa.deratian, was develo�ed and so a�ermanent c�ravity storm system could bed.'Staf� has examined the existing situat�.on, taking into account the pending iaw suit, and has aome up with several optians {see Drawing No: 2). , • "Marie Pond Op�ion I" i.s to da nathing, leave the system as i.s. The problem with this is that there is the possibi].ity of further flooding af the Carey hame on Douglas Road'. "Marie Pand Optian II" is �o fi11 in the yard of this home. The home is walk out, but the yard is really only suitable for an at grade house, so this has created the problem. By filling in the yard the hame would lose it's walkout capabilitx, but all risk of further flaoding would be eliminated. The cast of f311ing in the lot, and modifying the home wou].d be about $30,000 if the homeowner were cooperative. Anather option, "aption III", wauld be a less camplicated option to im�rlement. Th3s option invalves building a berm along city praperty w�.th a one way flow valve. This berm wauld l�eep all �ond water on City praperty, and allow the resident's lot to retain zt's own water until the storm pa�sed. The cost of this option woul.d be abaut $10,000. The problem with all these optians is �hat the lift statian must remain in service, which means cantinual yearly maintenance and aperating casts. The final option, "Option IV°, wauld entail pipinc� the water from the Marie Park Pond ta the new pond created in Vic�oria Hic�hlands Park. This is the ultimate plan configuration from back when Mar�.e Park Pond was designed. With this aption the li�t statian could be abandaned or �alvaged. The anly drawback. is the cost. It will cost a proximately $92,000 for extra storm pipe and oversizing, but raughly �30,000 of this would,be offset by the reduction in annual lift statian costs. * s � I, Do Nathing II. Fill Carey Lot TII.Berm Carey Lot IV. Gravity Starm C4ST $3d,000 $10,000 Swr $92,404 ADVANTAGEIDISADVANTAGE Nane/Passible Future Flooding No future fioodsjCooperation n n No floads or L. StationJGost Council must decide which option is best; note the funding options avail.able under the Assessment section of this report. Streets Th� townhomes and the single �amily lats have separate stree� s�stems. The townhomes will be served by a private street system. The City will canstruct the streets and assess the developer, then the streets will revert back to the developer and become private. The cost of constructing the private street system as shown on the drawing, will be approximately $106,570. The streets serving the single family lots will be standard city s�reets, 33 feet wide, The cost of constructing the streets for the single family lots as shown will be $151,000. Victoria Highlands Cost Summarv. UTILITY Townhome Sanitary Sewer 5ingle Family Sanitary Swr Townhome Watermain Single Family Watermain Townhame Storm sewer (ptA) 'Single Family Storm Sewer (ptB) Common Storm Sewer {ptCj Townhome Streets Single Family Streets • TOTAL HIGHLANDS COST Marie Park Pond $64,950 $98,690 $88,090 $110,590 $30�940 $39,910 $51,430 $106,570 $151,000 $742,170 0 to $�2,000 Assessments In addition ta the pra�ect casts, there are some deferred �assessments that mu�t be paid aff ar brought current. There is $98,435.46 in deferred assessments and interest on the developed property that are naw due. In addition there is $80,664.39 in de�erred assessments of �uture paXments that staff recommends be reassessed (see Kathy Swansan's memo, "Victoria Highlands Assessment Deferments", enclosed in this council packet for additional infarmation). All the sanitary sewer, watermain, street, interior storm sewer and deferred as�essment costs will be assessed to the townhomes and single family lots. The deferred assessments and common storm sewer cost� can be split pro�ortionately based on the number of lots in the townhome and S.F. partion of the development. The total assessed amount and per unit or lot assessment for each por�ion is shown below. P4RTION CONSTRUCTI�N DEFERRED TOTAL � UNITS CO�T PER COST ASSESSMENT UNIT COST Townhomes $314,060 $36,875 $350,935 33 $1Q,970 �.F. Lots 428,110 43,790 471,900 38 12,420 TOTAL $742,170 $80,665 $822,835 70 . ; The different options far addressing the Marie Park Pond i�sue each have a different me�had for covering the costs. Option I, the Do Nothing option, wi11 not require any additional funding. Option IS or Optian III, �illing ar berming of the Carey lot will require between $10,000 and $30,000 of �unding. This funding could mast easily be covered by General Obligatian Fund. The drainage district consist� of over 300 lots, so it would be a majar task to assess far this work. Option IV, the gravity storm system, will have roughly $62,000 of needed funding a�ter realizing the cost savings from remaval of the lift station. This additional funding could come from assessments to the property owners in the drainage district.� Alternatively, it could be realized �rom a combinatian of funding sources. About $25,000 of the required $62,000 could come from a special Park fund, due to the enhancement of the p�rk from reduction iri flooding. The remaining $37,000 could be covered by general obligation bonds. This is justified by the fact that the City charges 2� over the actual interest rate on the project bond; the additional interest charges of.. 1� o� the entire principal will more than cover the $37,400 taken fram G.O. The advantage of this is that'the very difficult and expen�ive task of assessing 300+ homeowners (many who have been previausly a�sessed �or storm sewer on up ta three separate optians) cauld be avaided. RECOMMENDATI�N Staff recammends Cauncil do the fallowing: * Approve the reassessment of the deferred assessment� on the property to be develaped {as discussed in Kathy Swanson's Mema) * Select an option for addressing the Marie Park Pond {Staff leans towards aption IV, the gravity storm sewer option). * Select a Funding method for the �elected Marie Park Pond option, and order a Feasibility Hearing if the option chosen requires it, * Approve the Feasibility Report. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendations and selects option IV for Marie Pond with no assessmants they �hould pass a motian adopting Resolution No. 8?- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, �TORM SEWERS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VICTORIA HIGHLANDS (TMPROVEMENT N0. 87, PROJECT N�. 7j. Tf Council desires to implement th� staff recammendatian but wishes to use asSessmen�s ta cover storm sewer costs they should pass � motian adopting Resolution No. 87- , RES4LUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE VICTORIA HTGHLANDS SUBDIVISION (TMPR4VEMENT NQ. 87, PROJECT Nfl. 7} City of Mendota Heights Dakata County, Minnesata RESOLIITTON N0. 87- RESOLUTIQN ACCEPTING ENGTNEER'S REP4RT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SFECIFICATIONS F4R SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS, AND STREETS TO SERVE VICTORIA HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION {IMFROVEMEN'I' N0. 87, PROJECT N0. 2) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his repart to the City Cauncil with respect to the proposed construction of the followa,ng improvements to serve Victoria Highlands Subdivision, to-wit: The construction of an extensian to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and inciden�als thereto, and the acquisition of easemen�s, and the reconstructian where necessary of streets and ease- menC in the areas hereinafter more particularly described. The construcCian of an extension ta the City's storm sewer system, including appurtenances and incidenGals Chereto, and Che acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and ease- ment in the areas hereinafter mare particularly described. The construction of an extension to the City's wa�er distribution system, including appurtenances and incidentals there�o, and the ac- quisitian of easesnents, and the recanstruction where necessary of streets and easement in the areas hereinafter more particularly des- cribed. The construction street improvements consisting oi the acquisition of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminaus surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter mare garticularly described. WHEREAS, Marvic Company, develaper of the praperty, has heretofare in writing getitioned the Ci�y Cauncil. of the City of Mendota Heights requesting the above described improvemen�s and in said petition requested that the entire cost of said improvements be assessed against said property; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construc- tian thereof were feasible and desirable and further repar�ed on the gropased costs of said improvements and consCruction thereof; and WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City af Mendota Heights in Dakota Caunty, Minnesota and is more parCicularly described as follows: Victoria Highlands Subdivision NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLV�D by �.he City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. Tha� it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct the abave described impravements, and it is hereby � ordered that said improvement be made. 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed to , prepare plans and specificatians for said improvement. 3. Tha� said improvement shall hereaf ter be known and designated as Im- provement No. 87, Project No. 7. ; Adopted by the Ci�y Cauncil of the City af Mendota �eights this 15th day af iDecember, 1987. i � � CITY C4IINGIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �� ' BY AT'TEST: Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk City of Mendata Heigh�s Dakota County, Minnesota RES4LUTION N4. 87 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT ' AND CALLING F4R HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WA'TER, STORM SEWER, AND STREET IMPRQVE- MENTS TO SERVE VICTORIA KIG�iLANDS SUBDIVISION AND � � ADJACENT AREAS (TMPROVEMENT N0. 87, PROJECT N0..7) ' WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with respect ta the grogosed construction af the follawing improvements to serve VicGoria Highlands Subdivision and adjacent areas, to-wit: The construction af an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including�appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisi�ian of easements, and the reconstruc�.ion where necessary of streets and easementsin the areas hereinafter more particularly • described. The construction of a storr� sewer system including appurtenances and inca.dentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for ' the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of an ex�.ension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisi- tian of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in �he area hereinafter more particularly described. WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed far said improvements is situated within the City af Mendota Heights in Dakota Coun�y, Minne- sota, and is more particularly described as follows: oi15 Areas north of Trunk Iiighwy 11Q, North Frantage Road, ease of Lexington Avenue, west of I-35W, and south af Douglas Road. WHEREAS, in �aid report said City Engineer reported that the proposed impravements and constructa.on thereaf were feasib�.e and desirable and furCher reported on the proposed costs af said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY`RESOLVED by Che City Council o� the City af Mendota Heights, Minnesota as �ollows: 1. That the repart of said City Engineer be and is hereby re- � � ceived, 2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tuesday, January 5, 1987 at 7:45 o'clock P.M. at the Mendota Heights City , Hall 750 South Plaza Drive in the City of Mendota Heights. �, 3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City ; Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a notice ` of said hearing and to cause said notice to be published and mailed to the owners of the property situated within said area, all i� accordance with applicabl� Minnesota Statutes. ; ' Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th ; day of December, 1987. ; . CITY COUNCIL ' • � CITY OF NIENDOTA HEIGHTS r By • • Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson � City Clerk .