The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-05-05Y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA � 1. Call to Order. -- 2. Roll Call. — �,Q�� AGENDA MAY 5, 1987,- 7:30 P.M. �; 3� ��'`�/ `�, � C �; sJ r�M � L � 3 . 'Agenda Adoption. _ � � �_ � � � � � �� 4. Approval of Minutes, April 21 Joint Meeting and April 22. 5. Consent Calendar: � /� a. Acknowledgement of April 28 Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgement of March Code Enforcement Report. c. Acknowledgement of HRA Letter on CDBG Funds. d. Acknowledgement of Memo on Divine Redeemer Ambulafice Service. e. Extension of Office Lease. f. Approval of the List of Claims.- rr-�, g. Approval of List of Contractor Licenses. h. Approval of Cigarette Licenses. i. Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses. End of Consent Calendar. 6. Introductions. 7 . Publ ic Comments . � �. � , 8. Bid Awards and Hearings. 9. Y a . Bid �Award ; pri,�g ACreek �es/Val � Curve .�(Re�s�ol � � or�` .. �; No . 8 7-41 yj�,..� -�-�� y/�•o� r�`'� .� b. HEARING CASE NO. 87-03/87-04, TANDEMfKING, REZONING & SUBDIVISION. 7:30 P.M. (Utility, gradinc� & drainage plans will e �jv,� il b e Tuesd y ve in i you w�.sh to C review) . ,%� . -E'� ��. - �a�.�� _- a�� , (1�%�..�✓� . �.1� - � 7 ' y 2� ` �� `'`"'�-: Unfinished and New Business: a. Unisys Parking Lot Expansion Request. — �lf� �i Y /� -� �� b. CASE NO. 87-08, St. Pau 's United Methodist Church,` '�� Subdivision.�— � � - � c. CASE NO. 87-10 Losleben Wetlan s Permit. -� c' i�- `�'.� �`'�,�i` _ � � � t,�,,';�,''�, �� A ' �.�- �.- � � J d. Plans and Specs, The Ponds & Rolling Woods. (Resolution �i N,� � 4 2 � . � . /�� '_ �'vy` ' , . � �.�-.�, ..� ..,..._, a a ��. e. Medical Response Policy.�- �� f. Marriott Liquor License. �—�� /��.�� /�� -. ;�7'�-� � M:� i. RevieGi'of Bart n-Aschman Contract for Study of Riley Park S ite . _. �� 3-a; ,��;.� �.�,� Met Council Fu� P anning Effort. ^' s Appo ntme� of Receptionist. - � �� %�� j. Endo sement of Can d te for LM Board of Directors. - �A;� � �"� �-�.��...� • , 0. Res onse�o Council Comments: 1 p _ 11. 1 2 a. Park Bond Costs Incurred. ��+�� b. Copperfield Clean-up/Dog Training Restriction. ��(` 7 a- �/f/%� . Comments. Adj ourn . ^ �: �p 0 � �, ��e/"r w� . / " V"`� ��C/� O �i�(wy�� " � /�( "� �-� C G' U �' � �. �� `� �� —y , — �� - �� ' .�.� �� . ,�,;� -�'` ��-� 3 ; � yF � . �, , �- � �° . ��.. .�. ��. �� - - �� .� �� . --�-�.� � - � � - � �� -, - �. ��.�.� �� - . � � - �1s.�- �,{ . '�? ��:�,,,.�� -�� . — � 2-� -�G �� Y��. — �. �.�� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 5, 1987 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kevin D. Frazel'ly�� ministrator Re: Add On Agenda for Meeting of May 5, 1987 Five items are recommended for addition to this evening's a�enda, and additional information is submitted for Item 8.a. Bid Award Spring Creek Acres/Valley Curve. 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda with the addition of the following items: 8.c.- Continuation of public hearing on Stratford Woods feasibility report; �9.c.1/2. - Approval of Rolling Woods final plat; 9.d.1/2. - United Properties Request for Sign setback variance; 9.f.1/2. - Permanent Status Appointment for Police Officer Jeff Piotraschke; 9.f.3/4. - Resignation of Police Captain Gene Lange. 8.a. Bid Award Sprinq Creek Acres/Vallev Curve Please see attached memo from Public Works Director Jim Danielson. _ , 8.c. Continuation of public hearina on Stratford Woods � feasibilitv report. As you will see in the attached report from Public Works Director Jim Danielson, developer pobie has requested continuation of this item to the meeting of May 19th. However, as the public hearing was formally continued to this evening, Council should make public note of the continued tabling. � , 9.c.1/2. RollinQ Woods Final Plat See attached report for Public Works Director Jim Danielson. � 9.d.1/2. United Properties request for siQn setback variance. Please see attached memo from City Administrator Kevin Frazell. 9.f.1� Permanent Status AApointment for Police Officer Jeff Piotraschke Please see attached memo from Police Chief Dennis Delmont. 9.f.3� Resignation of Police Captain Gene Lange. Please see attached memo from Police Chief Dennis Delmont. Gene's retirement will, of course, create changes in the Police Department, and the need to promote and recruit. Staff will have an analysis of our needs and recommendation at the meeting of May 19th. We also have in place current appointment rosters for both Sergeant and Patrol Officer. We will begin to evaluate the candidates on the top of those rosters. - " , � , � _ __ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS . ___ _ _ __ _ _. __ . _ MEMO May 4, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City ��n�l`��or � -G � FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Direc�or SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewers and Water Services . Valley Curve Estates Job No. 8617 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 5 _ Sewers, Water, Streets Spring Creek Acres Job No. 8703 Improvement No.�87, Project No. 1 DISCUSSION• Bids were opened Monday, May 4th for the Valley Curve Estates/Spring Creek Acres project, there were two bids received as follows: Orfei Contracting, Inc. $145,403.82 Lake Area Utility Contracting, Inc. 157,520.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $110,000.00 As you can see the bids, although lower, were still about 30% over estimate and will result in about a$21,000 assessment for lots on the cul- de-sac in the Spring Creek Acres subdivision. Valley Curve Estates assess- ments are for sanitary sewer and water services only and will be $14,000. The Developers are currently reviewing their opertions and ask that action on the bids be delayed until next meeting. ACTION REQUIRED• - - Accept the bids and table action on them until the May 19th meeting. a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 4, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Ad ��tor FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director � SUBJECT: Stratford Woods Feasibility Hearing Job No. 8626 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 13 � DISCUSSION• � The feasibility hearing for the Stratford Woods subdivision was conducted by Council on April 7, 1987. The final Stratford Woods plat had not been approved and there were some adjoining property owners present at the hearing to express concern over the property line location. Council tabled the hearing to May 5th to allow time for the Developer, Mr. Dobie, to work out the problems. Mr. Dobie contacted City Hall Monday, May 4th and informed us that he would not have the problems worked out by this meeting. He requested that the hearing be continued again�to May 19th (the next regular meeting). ACTION REQUIRED• Council needs to open the continued hearing and continue it to the May 19th meeting at 8:00 P.M. p 1 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 4, 1987 � T0: Mayor, City Council and Cit .�d 'm��ator FROM: James E. Danielson ' Pub�ic Works Director SUBJECT: Rolling Woods Final Plat :+Y DISCUSSION: Mr. Floyd Unruh has submitted the attached final plat and grading plan for his Rolling Woods subdivision. During the final surveying for the plat it was discovered that the Houchen's house was actually farther west than was shown on the preliminary plat and it caused some minor adjustments to be made. The Anderson house, that is located on the lot to the north, was shown platted as a flag lot fronting on Wesley Lane on the preliminary plat. This lot had to be changed to front on Mager Court. The w:idth of the access part of the flag lot needs to be increased to at least 30 feet and the Developer has agreed to make that change. , � Staff has also at`tached Mr. Unruh's executed Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that subject to State and County concurrence and the width of the flag lot access being increased to 30 feet that the Developer's Agreement be executed and the final plat be approved. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor and Administrator to execute the De- veloper's Agreement and pass a motion appxoving-Resolution No. 87- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE ROLLING WOODS SUBDIVISION. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS .___ _ _ .. __ _. _ Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 87- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE ROLLING WOODS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS', a final plat for the Rolling Woods Subdivis.ion has been sub- - mitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat and f inds the same to be in order. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, as follows: 1. That the final plat for the Rolling Woods Subdivision sub- mitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the f inal plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of-.Mendota.Heights this 5th day of May, 1987. • CITY COUNCIL CITY' OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 0 DEVELOPER'.S_ _AGRED�'IENT CONCERNING SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPNIENT ON THE 9.54 ACRES LOCATED IN THE NORTH PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (� 1/4) OF SECTION 25, T28N, R23id, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - This Agreement made and entered into this ,3 Z> day of� Q►�� 1987, by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,'Minnesota,� (hereinafter called the "City") and Donald V. Mager and Floyd Unruh, 2111 Delaware Avenue, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, 55120 (hereinafter called the "Developer"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for a single family development in Mendota Heights to be known as Rolling Woods Addition, consisting of 16, single family lots on approximately 9.54 acres in the northwest quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 25, in Mendota Heights; and WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Developer from Mendota Heights in order to proceed with said development; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between�the two parties as f ol lows : l. Developer will petition the City for needed public improvements (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermains, and Streets). Developer agrees to pay $2,400.00 escrow to the City as per Ordinance 1503. Escrow to be refunded upon successf ul completion of a project. 2. Developer will provide at no cost to the City all needed temporary construction easements to install said i.mprovements and those per- manent, right of way and easements, necessary for said public improvements. 3. Mendota Heights will proceed as expeditiously as possible with hearings or 100% petitions and such additional proceedings as may be required to cause public improvements to be installed. 4. Developer will proceed immediately to commission a registered land surveyor to place enough lot corners so that street centerlines - can�be located by City staff. 5. Developer agrees to grade site according to the grading plans dated November 6, 1986 and protect the environment by the�use of good erosion control methods. Minimum erosion control require- ments will consist of top dressing, seeding and mulching of dis- turbed areas within 30 days of site work completion, as well as the use of a sump area followed by a double row of staked hay bales or silt fences where concentrated surface water runoff takes place (per grading plan). , _ _ _ 6� Develaper acknawledges �hat there will be a park contribution due to the Ci�y as per Ordinance 301, Section 6 as ammended by Resolu- tion $0-16. That contribution is ta be $b00 per io� or $9,600 .QO r and is payable before the Ci�y will sign the final plat. 7. Developer understands that al1 deferred as�essments need to be gaid; Hauchens -$6,731 and Andersan -$3,847 befare the City will -• execute the final plat. .� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �. Charles E. Mertens�tto, Mayor Kevin D. Frazell, Ci�.y Administratar DEVEIA R Donald V. Mager 1 a .��.� Floyd Unruh 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAY 5, 1987 � TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fraz , ity Administrator SUBJECT: United Properties Request for Sign Setback Variance Attached is a letter from United Properties Assistant Vice President, D�le_Glowa, requesting Council authorization for a 20 foot setback variance for a sign at the Cray Research building on Mendota Heights Road and Enterprise Drive. Normally, variances are processed through the Planning Commission. However, United's request for these sign variances have become rather routine, and because of the precedent, staff agreed to send this directly to the City LCouncil. In fact, we have attached a copy of a May, 1985 'memo which made recommendation for a similar setback on this same property. Mr. Glowa will be present to answer Council questions. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the request, it should pass a motion authorizing a 20 foot setback variance to United �� Properties for a sign to be'located at the entrance to Cray Research near Mendota Heights Road and Enterprise Drive. KDF:madlr - -� attachments a , � May 1, 1987 Mr. Howard Dahlgren President Dahlgren, Shardlaw & Uban, Inc. 300 First Avenue Narth, Suite 2I.0 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 RE: MHBC VI - Cray Research 1340 Mendata Heights Road Dear Howard: ��Y - 5 t9�'t WRI S DIR�N E � As you requested, this memo is �o review with City staff the necessary approval proce�s for the r�ew Cray Research manument ta �. bc� located at the property entrance along Mendota Heights Road. This sign will be an exact dup3icate of the internally I.it monument that is located at �he Nor�hland Drive entrance a� the two-s�ory building. The sign will sit an a handsome brick base with landscapa.ng around it. We know from our experience with �he o�her sign that placing it 20 feet aff �he property line does not create any traffic hazards or ather related visual prablems. I have enclosed a capy af Jim Danielson's memo to staf� da�ed May 30, 1985. Additionally, I have enclosed a copy of the specific location and plan for said sign. Minimizing the approval process will be greatly appreciated; hawever, we are prepared ta caopera�e with your reguiremen�s. Please advise as soon as it is canvenient. The tenant is anxiaus for the installa�.ion af �his new sign. Yaurs truly, G�t.�L�_ � ale . lowa Assi ant Vice President Pro j�e t Manager DJGfymc Enclosures � �. . . ' �� . « t:1•c , .. � _ � Northland Executive Qf#ice Cenierl3500 West 8Qth StreetlMinneapolis, Minnesota 554311(612� 831-1OQ0 � : .. . _ � _ ' � ' • �5•'� : � , � '� �� .. '-}=.jt, . , .. . • ' . � / ' � , •'..-.• . . . .T:;;�r�. . .. j . ' • . . `. ' * , ' . .. .•r�',',��,! r• ' . � � ' . . ' � ... . • , \ • . `y,., `! :a' • ' . . .. , :' , • ... •• _ . ;. • . /I ' � ' '�,-; • • • .. . .� , : . . • .. '�>.��,, .,'�- . . . . : � , ' • � . = . , . � ., �.t.^ . . . . � - Q ' .. . . . . . . .. � • . ... . , : . ,�� . . . .. � �� . . . � • . • �cw, • cc.� , � ' . .. � • � . . , . - - �� . . . . . . . : r �p � U�y� � . . . _ . . . �,n c�W, GGf�rT-� ,4� G�, . - - � .- - • . .: �k �G2� :� iT�O � (.��4 ��Y,i�'_ ; ::-;"..��.: '. . - ►u�T'b.(-�i�.�(�� JUtJI� O},1L�, � .. . - .,,. . � . . ��A1L P.LANTII�tG'"AREAS'RECFIYITJ��i,tt�:':',_., • � --- �' 'TLi�G�ili:li�w7� r'!1{1WW�7--Y .•.�r��. . ��:. .. � • ' . �—_-SHA11 R�CEIYE .A._ � � . . � 'r--OF- �tT,"�NG�SOIL ��T0 �S�IL.�- .��'='-:' , � , . . - Sl�t+mP�A1./3.PfAT OR MAtJi�tEJ, . ;.,,:.- :�f�,��- .; . � �u �� .G f} '�" - .,�. � .- IJil�c f� L-Jg�2 ti�_-_� � :' : : :. .. . - _(_�._. . G.�� . , . � � . �--� : _ -_.�... � . _. � _ .._____.__ ._._-. . �_______ __ , . �. _ _ _ �-�� - _ � �.-_ �__ .4-Z��.: � � U�n-� � _ . � �� ._. =.=-__.. - _ __----. --..--_- . - . . =. .. __ ___� ._ . .. .. . -. . - -� Frnst A:�sociates --- , - .: __ p . . . ...� --- . ._ . __ - _.::�i+� � N � � ,+'O � . . � �/'iii",�„f . . .,�nd.e.,:.reNt.ctur.. Ivd pi�rrrnp ....____---�---- --_ �- - —:_ �`S/� 1 1 122 w�st �bctfl �wet � chasfca, rtwnn. � 6b3/8 ■ 6t2/4<i�4044:: � •• ��• .�• w �v� �'9► _1�� l�►� ;` • �T��a� t �. �. s ��r�� i��Sjc.�� _ +��'`� �..! �p■�iA��i � �. T ' ` . � 7 `� , ; . .r f� .yi J� ' , - ' � " r, • ' . • - < -, . . •" L� .�- . � _ '� �. . • ...� � , � . . y 1.� ��:\�. • . .�. �:., : . _.• . .•� �� • ��. �'... • • ' �• r . . .' . ) � . ( . . , ' .. . . ` . _ .�� 'l � .. ' - ). � �•�\ , � ... '1. .a � / - . . � 5• - 4 _ - 4 S • . ' ` . ' . . �J. � -�. ,. 'h . > •' • • • . • . .. :� � . •!�� . �� . . � � �� . .- � � .. •:' . . � � _ . . � � . � . .. . , 'q . A � . > .� '.. ♦ .� �^ ( ' .. . -� M � . � h . . . :. . . • .. l • '. . . . ' '"'. ., .- _._- i......: ._....r^.i.� _ ..': :._ _�.'" " ` .. _ '� ':, .... � ' ' ".. .... . . _ .. .- i 8 .;w;:_. � _ �y� C 0 � CITY OF MENDOTA IiEIGI�TS M�MO � T0: Ma or , Cit Council and City Adm' is Ta�"or � Y Y � FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director ' SUBJECT: tinited Praperties Variance Case No. 85-14 DISCUSSI01�': � May 30, 1985 JUN 0 31Ag� U1�t1fFD P`RCx,��:�;� United Properties desires to construct a building identification sign for their new two story o�fice building that is ta be occupied b}= Cray Research. The building i.s located at the intersectian of Northland Drive and Transport Drive. United would like ta have the'sign be a low ground sign af a simi3ar design to zheir office park monuments located along Pilot Knob Raad. They have constructed a plywood mack up of the sign and placed it in its proposed location along Northland Drive for anyone desiring to view haw it would appear. The sign canforms ta all the City ordinances except that it is prapased to be set back only-20 feet from the pro�perty line, 40 feet is required. Several years aga United gresented a proposed ordinance change to tY�e Gity that would allow for a 2Q foat setback f or law ground signs a.n the Industrial Park. The Council agreed with the cancept but has yet ta�adopt the ordinance. Instead we have been rou�.inely granting the variances f or the 20 foot setback: RECOMMENDATION: Staff and Pianning t;ommission recomm�nd that the Gity Council grant ilnited Praperties a 20 foot variance ta the 40 foat front yard sign setback requiremenL. ACTIQA' REOUIRED: , Iz Council k�a.shes to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion granting a 24 faat variance ta the 40 foat front yard sign setback requirement far Lat l, Black 2, Mendota H�ights Business Center. 1 e ..�� '' g Y �4 �',' �„ d`�' �, ! ... - �' .. . � 1 � .� � , . . � ' y� �'" �' N�� '' �'" . ' __ � + N . , " �� {� T' "� ` �• � � , n ,r_� �� - , 3 � (� ' } Y i ; � ��d� � �. . .. :, � � . br�>>� '� j W � � + r��r� �. � � � m . �� >�c ._....._�.- ' � � � m � - `! j �f �� , � .::_=�-= . � , � � � __ T:�— � � . � �� =--,-- � � � I'� � �,� � - _ -__--• "' �- � i� , � � (a . _ . -j-:-= .- _.. � � � �..., G F��, -�-; ;-_-:._=.._ _ z�"� 1 i ' � � � �-...�_ � i � � � �----= -�—;- M �i s '. ;�. �U ---_.. _ . . � . � . :,-�-,— • � -.-. -- � � . . � � � ! ri �1 -:- - � � • � c! � c � 1 ...._._.—. �, . �-n—r--z� ....,.cr..._�_.—_ .- C � ._-..___._------:- - a i . . � � .,nnn(� ! . Y�uq � i • a�;g� � � , � �� a , _yi r f I . �'. �. Z�� P � i � G ` �1y ' , � C -- - - - � . t r ? � � � Q, . — - � . �� . �� , ' ' = r o`o i � � . ; � �-- .,nnn({� � � • �,,� "7]'L _. .. �� . . _��+'-�--"�„.: _..___. `1 CustorrscY L1t11TL"L- i��: i E1�:i�,= ``�`�le : f4 R�.wisions .rA�S� +�!h,.r-C This drawing is the properkyof Drawn By �N�►�r��T � -0' �+� o.rti• ��516� I:A IKC �, i1 ��fSOt s�z wesr t,ake screet ,.. , +. �ry Daie Cusromer A�xoval Date Minr�poiis, MN 554�C3f3 . F17•A7i•77ni Citv_of Mendota Itei�hts Memor�ndum May 4, 1987 TO: Mayor and City Council City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police ��,', �� SUBJECT: Permanent Appointment of Officer Jeff Piotraschke iNTRnDUCT10N Jeffrey Piotraschke has successfully completed one year's probation as a Mendota Heights Police Officer and I request that Council now appoint him to that position on a permanent basis. DiSCUSSION Officer Piotraschke was appointed as a probationary officer on May lst, 1986. His probation period has now expired and the Department is very pleased with his work. Both Sergeants have indicated that Jeff is doing an excellent job and he has been well accepted by his fellow officers. Jeff came to us with high praise from his former employer and he has reinforced their comments with a year's worth of solid, productive work. ALTERNATiVES Approve permanent appointment. Extend the probationary period. Ternunate the employee. RECOMMFNDATION That Probarionay Police Officer Jeffrey Piotraschke be appointed to the permanent position based on his successful completion of one year's probation. , May 4, 1987 Citv c�f Mendata Hei�;hts Memor�ndum TO: Mayor and City Council City Administrator �� FROM: Chief of Police '�� SUBJECT: Retirement of Captain Gene Lange INTRODUCTiON The attached letter has been given to me with the request that it be transmitted to the City Council and Administrator. It outlines Captain Lange's intent to retire from The Mendota Heights Police Department effective June 30, 1987. HISTORY AND DTSCUSSiON Gene Lange has served the City and the Police Depaztment, for nearly 25 years, in every capacity from Patrol Officer to Police Chief. He has done so with unquestioned commitment, dedication and integrity. Changes in the PERA retirement formula have made it imprudent for him to postpone this difficult decision. It goes without saying that he will be sorely missed and difficult to replace. Captain Lange possesses a work ethic that is becoming harder and harder to find these days. He is a loyal officer who gives the City 8+ solid hours every working day and still maintains a pleasant and helpful attitude. I began my career in the old BCA "rookie school" with Gene and I am very happy to have had the opportunity to spend the past five years working beside him. He has brightened many days in "the cellar" and I regret the fact that he must leave with so many producrive years ahead of him. RECOMMENDATTONS That Council accept the resignation of Captain Gene Lange with regret and appreciation. -� � � � May 4, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator Eugene H. Lange, Captain RETIREMENT RESIGNATION I have served the City of Mendota Heights for almost twenty five years as a police officer. During that time I received a generous amount of training and experience in making snap decisions. I have always felt comfortable with my ability to make such decisions, more often than not I think I have made the right decisions. Recently I found myself in a position to make a decision a snap decision in the element of time or the element of reached the age and time of service where the subject of mind. which was not to be difficulty. I have retirement was on my Several months ago the Public Employees Retirement Association made an announcement that they were going to change the formula for the Surviror's Annuity. When I investigated the results of this change on my account I learned that my 100� survivor's annuity would be reduced by about ten percent. This would mean that after two additional years of service my annuity would be the same as it would be if I retired prior to July 1, 1987. During our recent vacation in Florida, Mrs. Lange and I spent numerous hours talking about the "pros and cons" of retirement. Upon returning to work for several weeks and talking to PERA again we came to the conclusion that I should retire prior to July 1, 1987. This was subject to a personal inter- view with a PERA counselor which we completed on Friday, May lst. Please receive this letter as my offical request for termination of employment with the City as a police officer effective June 30, 1987. I have enjoyed my employment as an officer the past twenty five years, also the seventeen years I served the City as a volunteer firefigher are included in this experience. The friendships made, both personal and professionally, and the experiences, both good and bad, will remain with me the rest of my life. I have enjoyed serving the Members of the City Council, the two City Administrators and the three Chiefs of Police during the past twenty five years. I hope my performance of duties has left a good impression of the Department with the citizens of Mendota Heights, who I also enjoyed serving. I plan to go on with my construciton design business and remain in the area for the foreseeable future. Should my experience be of any use to the City, as limited by law, I would be happy to serve. Respectfully submitted, ( C .,/�%f , f'l%' �� 7-, J ��' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Minutes of the Joint Meeting with City Council-and Park & Rec Commission Tuesday, April 21, 1987 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the joint meeting of the Mendota Heights City Council and Park and Recreation Commission was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, April 21, 1987, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, and Hartmann. Councilmember Witt arrived�late in the meeting. Parks Commissioners present included Chair Stein, Commissioners Doffing, Katz, and Lachenmayer. Mayor Mertensotto began the meeting by asking City Administrator Frazell to list on the board all of the athletic facility options that had been originally considered in the Barton-Aschman study. There was then a group discussion clarifying the needs for an athletic complex. Park Chair Stein indicated that-the " Barton-Aschman study had documented the need for three or four ballfields, a soccer field, parking and a comfort/ storage. It was also noted that a minimum 20-25 acres would be needed on any site. It was noted that several of the sites originally discussed in the Barton-Aschman study, including Wachtler and Perkegwin, are no longer available due to current development. The McCloud/Ahlstrom site was eliminated as being too expensive, and the School Forest site as not readily available and having bad topography for an athletic complex. It was then narrowed down that the two reasonable alternatives are to continue working with School District No. 197 on a site around the Henry Sibley cam�us, or to consider some of the property owned by developer Jim Riley south of Mendota Heights Road and east of Dodd Road. Councilmember Blesener indicated that she is still in favor of working with the School District on the Sibley campus. Councilmember Cummins said that he had originally supported the conce�t of working with the School District, but had a problem with the School Board's attitude and approach, and � was beginning to question whether= or not the �-two -parties � . . -. . . - . . . • r could work together. He also indicated by the fact that the contributions from growing increasingl� unequal, with the more than the District. that he was bothered the two parties were City contributing much Parks Chair Stein said he thought the School District option was still in the best interest of the City, and said that one of the additional costs of the Riley site was taking this valuable property off the tax roll. He said he thought it was easy to take a negative attitude toward the School District because of the problems, but the School Board was ever changing and that the City could now take a more assertive position in the negotiations. Councilmember Hartmann said that he couldn't support putting over $1,000,000 of City money into the Henry Sibley complex if there was a possibility of the City losing all that investment sometime. He said that he also felt there were many people in West St. Paul who opposed the agreement. Chair Stein responded that he felt the proposal would benefit children from alI communities who attend Henry Sible� High School and who are participants in Mend/Eagan athletic programs. It was also noted that the West St. Paul Soccer League would probably use some of the fields. Councilmember Cummins questioned whether it might be possible to consider using a site south of Mendota Heights Road but closer to Dodd Road. _ o Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Court, said that he thought the Henry Sibley approach was bad for both the City and the School District. He highlighted concerns about the District's future financial capability, and whether they could make a commitment�to financing the maintenance of the athletic facility. Parks Chair Stein said that he didn't see finance as being a concern by the Board now, and Councilmember Blesener said she felt those concerns could be addressed in the agreement. Parks Commissioner poffin� said that even without School District financial participation he still felt the Henry Sibley site was the best of all the alternatives. _ Councilmember Blesener said that she did feel the City should take a hard look at the alternatives of both the Henry Sibley and Riley sites. It was agreed that the City staff should solicit a proposal from Barton-Aschman Associates, the Cit�'s parks planner, to do an analysis of the Riley site, including a point by point comparison of the pros and cons of the Riley versus the Henry Sibley site. There was some discussion of the issue of consumption of alcohol in the athletic facility. There was�a general � --concensus that it would be acceptable to ban-�alcohol. use,. but ,.._., .� :.:,, s. an acknowledgement that realistically people were going to be consuming some alcohol. Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 P.M. �� ATTEST: Char es E. Mertensotto Mayor 1 Kevin D. Frazel City Administrator - .. Pa�e No. 2420_ April �22, 1987 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meet�,�ng � Held Wednesday, April 22, 1987 Pursuant to due call and�notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember.Witt moved adoption of the agenda for the meeting, including i�ems contained in the add- on agenda. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 5 'Nays : 0 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Councilmember Hartmann moved approval of the minutes of the April 7th meeting. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda,.deleting 5g, Approval of Rubbish Hauler Licenses, placed on the agenda in error, along with authorization for execution of all necessary documents contained therein. a. b. c. d. e. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the April 6th Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for March. _ _ Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's revised report for March. Approval of the List of Claims dated April 22, 1987 and totalling $266,920.41. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated April 22, 1987 and attached hereto. � _ Pac�e No. 2421 - -- . � April 22, 1987 � f. Approval of the issuance of Cigarette Licenses ; to Snyders Drug Store and Somerset Country Club. � Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes : 5 � - Nays: 0 HEARING �- ALLEY Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the VACATION purpose of a public hearing on the proposed vacation of a 10 foot alley located at the rear of Lots 3 through 8 of the Cherokee Park Heights Addition. Public Works Director Danielson informed the Council and audience that the City initiated the hearing at the request of William Neish, 572 Hiawatha. He stated that City and County maps indicate that the alley has been vacated at some time in the past but that vacation documents have never been recorded with the County. He recommended that the alley be vacated, subject to submission of 10 foot utility and drainage easements by adjacent landowners. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. Mr-. Bill Treuder, 564 Hiawatha, stated that he understood that the alley had been vacated some time ago and that he was present because he thought the City was considering re-acquiring the alley easement. Public Works Director Danielson informed Council that Mr. Neish had planned on being present later in the meeting. Action on the matter was delayed to later in the evening. TARGET ISSUES The Council acknowledged and discussed the 1987/88/89 Target Issues and Priority list determined by Council at its April 11th workshop. Councilmember Cummins moved to adopt the target issues and priority list as changed to move the Highway 110/Lexington Intersection to priority 19 and Ordinance Codification to priority 23. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PERSONNEL The Council acknowledged a memo from the Cit� Clerk recommending that Mary Jean Erickson be appointed � to the Receptionist/Clerk-typist position. _, .. _ � ___ _ Pac�e No. 2422 _ April 22, 1987 ' Mayor Mertensotto moved to c�rant probationary appointment to Mary Jean Erickson as Receptionist/Clerk-Typist, effective April 23rd, at ' Step B, Grade-I of the 1987 pay matrix. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 � Nays: 0 � BLOCK GRANT FUNDS ^�The Council acknowledged and discussed a report from the City Administrator informing the Council ' that if it is still Council's intent to use= Community Development Block Grant Funds to provide assistance for the northend project, the funds must be used for providing grants to eligible homeowners and cannot be used to provide interest free loans under federal regulations. Councilmember Hartmann moved that the Council's intent with respect to the use of CDBG funds for the northend project be changed to reflect that the loan program approved for the �roject will instead be a grant program to comply with new federal regulations and that the residents who will be affected be so notified. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 LEGISLATIVE The Council acknowledged an add-on agenda item from ISSUES the City Administrator regarding the City's position on legislative issues addressed in League of Minnesota Cities Action Alerts. Council directed that the Administrator contact the City's ' legislative representatives by phone, and by follow-up letters opposing the additional levy limit and sales tax on City purchases and , supporting the fiscal disparities bill. PARK PLACE The Council acknowledged and discussed the final plans and specifications for improvements to serve the Park Place Addition and adjacent areas. In response to a Council question, Public Works � Director Danielson stated that the Zwach and Nelson � easements have not yet been acquired and that, if necessary, the project can be done without the � easements. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-34, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR � BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE PARK PLACE � SUBDIVISION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 12)." Ayes: 5 Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Nays : 0 ._ . : . - - • ___ _ _ _ Pac�e_No. 2423 � April 22, 1987 i , Councilmember Blesener felt that the lot which the developer proposes to use as a tot lot should be dedicated to the Cit� or that the City should be given the right of first refusal over the lot ' should it ever be proposed.for development. ALLEY VACATION Mayor Mertensotto reconvened the hearing�on the HEARING � pro�osed vacation of an alle� in the C.D. Pierce CONTINUATION Addition and asked for questions and comments from the audience. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5' Nays: 0' IOS ASSESSMENT HEARING There being no Blesener moved P.M. Councilmember questions or comments, Councilmember that the hearing be closed at 8:02 Hartmann seconded the motion. Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-35, "RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF AN ALLEY," on the basis that the recording documents will not be filed until executed utility easements are received from adjoining property owners. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto opened the purpose of a public hearing - assessment roll for the IOS adj acent areas . � meeting for the on the proposed Plaza Addition and Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. It was noted that no written communicatians had been received from affected property owners. There being no c�uestions or comments from the � audience, Councilmember Cummins moved that the - hearing be closed. i Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 _ Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-36, "RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN TO SERVE I.O.S. PLAZA ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 82, PROJECT NO. 7�.n Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PONDS OF MENDOTA The Council acknowledged and reviewed the final � HEIGHTS FINAL PLAT plat for The Ponds of Mendota. ,Heights .:: ,_The�e ,was =:. =- __... . i -- - ----- � - -- April 22, 1987 --- i discussion over the termination of Warrior Drive. Council directed that it be well documented in all records that Warrior Drive is to terminate in a �ermanent cul-de-sac and that the street is not intended to be extended in the future. Mayor Mertensotto felt that it should �terminate in a dead-end instead of constructing a cul-de-sac at less than normal City requirements. Public Works Director Danielson stated that there is sufficient space within the right-of-way to construct a cul- de-sac to City standards. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-40, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE PONDS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS," and that a turn-around be constructed within the existing right-of-way at the north end of Warrior Pond. ., Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5, Nays : 0 " HEARING,-- MARRIOTT Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the LIQUOR LICENSE purpose of a public hearing on an application from the Marriott Corporation for limited service hotel . ' liquor license and special Sunday liquor license for the Marriott Courtyard Hotel. Mr. Terry Hedlund, the Marriott's regional director for food " , - �nd beverage, was present for the discussion. The Council acknowledged reports from the Police Chief and City Clerk relative to investic�ations completed on the application. Police Chief Delmont, present for the discussion, informed Council that the investigation results are very favorable and that he is planning a trip to Virginia to visit Marriott Courtyard facilities to confirm that the operations will conform to the requirements of the limited service hotel license. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments from the audience. , There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed at 8:24 P.M. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 It was noted that under the provisions of the Liquor Ordinance, action on the application cannot � be taken until the next regular Council meeting. INDUSTRIAL PARK STREET LIGHTS Ayes: 5 Nays: a Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 NORTH END STREETS --_ _ - -. - . _ Pac�e No . 2 4 2 5 Apr'il 22, 1987 The Cauncil acknowledged and discussed the £'easibility study on the proposed business park �treet li.ght project. Councilmember Hartmann moved adapta.on of Resolution No. 87-37,,�"RESOLUTit�N ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REP4RT AND CALLING FOR HEARING FOR STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT NO. $6, FROJECT NO. 11)," the hearing to be conducted an May 19th. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Gouncilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolution No. $?-38, "RESClLUTION CALLSNG FOR HEARING ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT," the hearing to be held an May 19th. Gouncilmember Cummins seconded the mati.on. The Council acknowledc�ed a memo from the Public Warks Director regarding north end street paving. CALI�AHAN The Council acknowledged and di.scussed a report PROPERTY �rom the Public Works Director regarding filling on . the Callahan propert�y on Marie at Dodd. Staf� wa� directed to notify the developer that grading af the �ropert� must be in conformance with the - " provzsians 3n the developer's agreement. PARK STUDY The Council discussed an add-on agenda mema and recommendation from the City Adminzstrator that Barton-Aschman Associates prepare a study and analysis of potential athletic camplex sites south of Mendota Heights Road and east of Dodd Road. Ayes: 5 Nays: Q AIRCRAFT NOISE, C{�MPREIiENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Councilmember Cummins moved to autharize �he Mayor and City Administrator to negotiate and enter a contract with Bartan-Aschman Assaciates for a detailed study of the Riley property for a community athletic complex site. "-� �� D� Councilmember xartmann �econded the motion. Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing an adoptian of the Metropolitan Council"s model ordinance for aircraft noise attenuation. Administrator Frazell informed the Council that the Legislature has adopted enabling legisiation but that the bi1]. has not yet been signed by the - Governor. He also �tated that it has been �-: •Y..:-.::-.�r-. :t•�•_ :_ � Ayes: 5, Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Pac�e No. 2426 April 22, 1987 recommended that the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment be resubmitted to the Metropolitan Council, but that since a study of the area south of Mendota Heights Road and east of Dodd for an athletic complex.site has been authorized, he recommends that only that portion of the amendment which includes the LR designation be resubmitted. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and comments , from the audience. � Mr. Bernard Friel, the City's MASAC representative, � expressed his support for adoption of the ordinance. There being no further questions or comments, Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing be closed at 8:43 P.M. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved that that portion of the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment which is bounded on the north by the Noise Zone 4 line, on the west by Huber Drive, on the south by the planned extension of Mendota Heights Road and on the east by Delaware Avenue be resubmitted for approval by the Metropolitan Council. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. FAA PART 150/ The Council acknowledged and discussed reports from FLIGHT CORRIDOR the City Administrator regarding the FAA Part 150 POSITION noise abatement program and a proposed joint STATEMENT position statement with the City of Eagan on aircraft flight corridors. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 MASAC representative Bernard Friel reviewed the recent MASAC vote on Part 150. The Council discussed the noise contours and also the noise generated by reverse thrust from take- offs over Minneapolis. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-39, "RESOLUTION GIVING QUALIFIED SUPPORT TO METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION PART 150 LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN." Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. The Council discussed and modified some of the , language in the position paper. -Council emphasized. i;- :__ , i - � i E � I I Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 COUNGIL COMMENTS i i � � � Ayes: 5 I�ays : 0 � ATTEST: --_ - _ -- _ . _ . Pac�e No. 2427 April 22, 1987 that it is nat the intention of either City to open discussion on the preferential runway system but rather is a matter �of confining the aircraft within the corridor. Cauncilmember BTesener moved adoptian of the Joint Position Statement on aircraft flight corridors. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. It was �.he consensus of Council. that the City Hall committee meeting be postpaned to 7:15 A.M. on May 5th. � Counailmember Witt �uggestsd that staff contact the League af Cities regarding orda.nance codification. ; Councilmember Cummins stated that hunting dogs are j being trained around the pands in Copperfield and disturbing wildlife. He asked that staff look into i the matter. � There being no further business to come before the i Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved tha� the i meeting be adjourned. � Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. i � TIME OF ADJOURN.M[ENT; 9:23 P.M. C ar es E. Mertenso 0 Mayor i j - - � Ka een M, Swanson City Clerk 0 , ' ! CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS I APRIL 28, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. by Chairman Morson. The following members were present: Morson, Anderson, Burke, Duggan, Henning, Krebsbach, and McMonigal. Also present were Engineer Klayton Eckles and Planner Howard Dahlgren. APPROVAL OF Commissioner Burke moved approval of the MINUTES Ayes: 7 ' Nays: 0 ; CASE NO. 87-03/ 87-04, KING/TANDEM REZONING/SUB- DIVISION I minutes of March 24. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order for the purpose of a continued public hearing on.rezoning and subdivision of property owned by Tandem Corporation and Mr. and Mrs. William King. Planner Dahlgren had distributed revised figures regardinc� the park contribution for the sub�ect area and reviewed those figures, noting that 12.40 acres out of a total land area of 139.6 acres would be dedicated for park area and that the Park and Recreation Commission accepted this dedication as proposed. Planner Dahlgren noted that the park dedication excludes water as well a:s::=. the land area excluding'water. Mr. Dick Putnam arrived to explain the new shore line established by the DNR and its impact on the park area. He noted that one area of park was enlarged to 5.7 acres, and several lots around the park had been adjusted to meet the 100 foot setback, so that now only 4 or 5 lots will not meet the 100 feet setback rather than 10-15 lots as in the original proposal. He pointed out that there will be 68 new lots in Copperfield III plus three lots from Copperfield II, making a total of 71 lots. There will be 61 lots in the Hampshire Estates addition in addition to the park area. Four lots in Hampshire are 14,000+ square feet, with the balance at or exceeding the 15,000 square foot lot sizes. Commissioner Burke asked the length of the longer cul-de-sac and Mr. Putnam responded that it is about 400 feet long. Mr. Putnam noted that there are 5 lots less in the new plan compared to the older plan. Commissioner Henning noted that any approvals -1- Ayes: Nays: Ayes: Nays: 0 7 0 CASE NO. 87-07, ANDERSON, SUB- DIVISION - given tonight are conditioned upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the noise ordinance and the southeast area comprehensive plan amendment. . Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience, and there were no comments . Mr. Putnam noted that the level of the ponds will be regulated by pipes, and that some wetlands permits would be asked for on a few lots that are not deep enough for building 100 feet from the ponds. Commissioner Henning moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Burke asked if entrance to the site from Delaware would be safe due to the rolling terrain along Delaware. Mr. Putnam noted that there will be no site problem once the site is graded, but that the site problem is difficult looking north along Delaware at this time. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion to close the public hearing at 7:58 P.M. Commissioner Duggan asked if the alignment of Mendota Heights Road is changed, does the park dedication change also? Planner Dahlgren said yes, it could, but there could also be additional park land picked up in the area south of Mendota Heights Road. Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend approval of a conditional use permit for a planned unit development, to rezone the land as a PUD in accordance with the southeast area plan, and to approve the subdivision of Copperfield III and Hampshire Estates as submitted, noting that these recommendations are conditioned upon approval of the aircraft noise ordinance and amendment of the southeast area comprehensive plan. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Chairman Morson called the meeting to order for the purpose of a continued public hearing for Carl Anderson's proposed subdivision of;-: _ •� � Hillside Creek, located in the area of First Avenue/Vandal and Brookside. Mr. Anderson was present and noted that he had spoken to Dr. Bruce Anderson of District No. 197 rec�arding Lots 1-16, Block 2, T.T. Smith Subdivision No. 3, which is owned by the School District. Dr. Anderson noted that it is not the desire of the district to sell the property at this time, but they would like the capability-to sell it in the future and do not want it landlocked. Mr. Anderson noted that he had spoken to Mr.- and Mrs. Kalaus, owners of property to the west of his site, and offered to sell them a stovepipe piece of land for $2,000 plus assessments, but they haven't decided what they wish to do yet. He also noted that Mr. Ray Christensen would like to be included in the plat. Mr. Anderson stated that Brookside would extend easterly to Laura Court, but that Laura Court, north and south, would not be improved, and it was his plan to have Emerson Avenue vacated only in this subdivision. He noted that as many trees in the fringe area will be saved. � Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. , Mrs. Kalaus, 1394 Clement, noted that she had � asked for access to her lots, but Mr. Anderson � said there could be no access without buying ' some of his land. She did not feel that she ; should have to buy additional land, since her lots were large enough to be buildable lots, without having to purchase more land. 1 Chairman Morson felt this should be worked out prior to the next meeting. He noted that if ; the cul-de-sac were moved over, it would give Kalaus' and Christensen access, and it would !• j be satisfactory to both parties. Mrs. Kalaus , asked about assessments and was told that ' there would be assessments for water, street ; and storm sewer, but not for �sanitary sewer. Mrs. Jose�h Bird, 676 Laura Court, expressed concern with storm water drainage onto her lot, since she has 165 feet of frontage. Staff was directed to address the additional water concerns prior to the next meeting. Mr. Ray Burrows, 668 First Avenue, asked which .=• � lots would be assessed. " -- .. ;>;�-;; r.z�,�,, - �- � There being no further questions or comments, Commissioner Burke moved to continue the public hearing to May 26, at 7:30 P.M. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. -� - . _ Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Commissioner Duggan stated that a survey addressing the tree coverage needs to bc submitted as part of the subdivision process. CASE NO. 87-08, Chairman Morson called the meeting to order ST. PAUL'S UNITED for the purpose of a public hearing for a METHODIST CHURCH, subdivision called Wesley Addition, which is SUBDIVISION easterly of St. Paul's United Methodist Church, on Dodd Road between Marie Avenue and North Freeway Road. Mr. William Gydesen, Chairman of the Church Board, was present to expla.in the request for five single family lots on 6.83 acres. Iie noted that the lots were roughly 100'x200' and conform to all ordinance requirements. Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. Mr. John Seiver, 689 North Freeway Road, asked that the developer not raise the grade as he doesn't want water problems in his yard. Mr. Gydesen said the lots will drairi to Wesle� Lane and that the grading plan will address any potential drainage problems. Mrs. Carla Prakash, 679 North Freeway Road, noted that she appreciates the City's concern with drainage. There being no further c�uestions or comments from the audience, Commissioner Henning moved to close the public hearing at 8:50 P.M. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend approval of the subdivision as presented. Commissioner McMonigal seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 87-09, Chairman Morson called the meeting to order G&L PROPERTIES, for the purpose of a public hearing on an REZONING/SUBDIV- application from G&L Properties for the ISION rezoning and subdivision of property located at the southeast corner of Mendota Heights ••_• �: Road and TH 55 . ._... - •. - - --r_ . . . . ::;,; -: . ... . - _ a� Ayes: Nays: 7 0 Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 ,s Mr. Bill Pearson, from G&L was present, as well as Mr. Lou Langer, and Bill Price, to explain the request. Mr. Pearson asked to rezone the parcel to I and B-3, deleting the B-lA designation. He noted that the Industrial zoning could contain an office, office warehouse, and/or motel. The B-3 zoning could contain a service station, fast fooc� type restaurant such as McDonalds, and a sit-down type restaurant similar to Ground Round. He also noted there would be a 60 foot roadway through the site. Commissioner Krebsbach expressed concern over landscapinc� on the site and wanted to be sure it was satisfactory. It was noted that any rezoning would require an amendment to the comprehensive plan and also that a 5% land dedication is required in industrial/commercial zones for a park contribution. Chairman Morson asked for questions or comments from the audience. No one was present for the hearing. Commissioner Henning moved to close the public hearing at 9:16 F.M. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioner Henning moved to recommend that the City Council amend the Comprehensive Plan such that the area outlined in blue on the drawing shown at this meeting be planned to be rezoned as Industrial. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Commissioner Henning moved to recommend approval of the subdivision as platted and that Block 1, (the blue area) be rezoned. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion. Commissioner Krebsbach, for discussion purposes, felt that it would be most desireable to have the parcel divided into three lots for two businesses (such as a service station and a restaurant). - 5- CAO CASE NO. 87-03, The Commission was advised that Mr. David OLSEN, SITE PLAN Olsen wished to have the scheduled public APPROVAL/VARIANCE hearing set for next month, as he did not have his revised drawings available yet. Commissioner A�derson moved to adjourn the public hearing scheduled for this evening and to continue it to the May 26 meeting. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 CASE NO, 87-10, Mrs. Julie Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, was LOSLEBEN, WETLANDS present to request approval of a wetlands PERMIT permit to allow construction of a 28 foot above ground swimming pool on Lot 3, Simek Rearrangement. It was noted that the Losleben's had written approval from their adjacent neighbors for the swimming pool construction, which would be constructed within six feet of the pond. Jim Losleben arrived at 9:28 P.M. to answer any other questions. Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend approval of the wetlands permit as requested to allow construction of a 28 foot above ground swimming pool at 815 Hazel Court, such "construction to be within six feet of the pond. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 VERBAL REVIEW Deputy Clerk DeLaRosa gave a verbal review of the cases that had gone before the City Council. MISCELLANEOUS A gentleman from Mendota was present for the Olsen Critical Area Ordinance variance and it was pointed out to him that the hearing had been adjourned,_at the applicant's request, to the May 26 meeting. ADJOURN There being.no further business to come before the Commission, Commissioner McMonigal moved that the meeting be adjourned. Commissioner Henning seconded the motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 � TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:38 o'clock P.M. � MErio DATE: 4_29_8� T0: Mayor,•City Council anri City A ni�� FROM: Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for April 1987 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE — 1937 N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED BLDG PERMITS ' sFD 12 1,592,327.96 14,953.14 41 5,892,503,08 49,979.41 APT Q O O Q c/� 12 6,188,G12.Q0 29,565.76 28 8,871,115,5& 47,940.69 MISC.28 174,307.44 3 471 88 suB TOTAL $7,955,247.40 $47,990.78 112 $a5,124,127.50 $104,:326.95 TRD PERMITS Plbg 20 541.00 58 1,507.00 Wtr 13 65.00 47 e 235'.00 swr 8 140.00 30 525.00 Htg, AC & Gas Pipe 29 2 267 $3,013.50 215 $10,835.00 SUB TOTAL 7 0 .� , , LICENSING Contractor's $6,775.00 Licenses � 42 050.00 598 �� 164 YEAR TO DATE - 198b � N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED 16 2,001,092.69 13,126.60 0 0 Q 4 414,500,00 2,214.56 59 $2;706,148.59 $19,427.01 25 19 14 38 193 549.00 75.00 i 210.00 ; 2,035.50 � 2,869.50 $4,825.00 =�a $7,955,247.40 $52,054,28 $15,124,127.50 $121,936.95 I348 $2,706,148.59 $21,12]..50 TOTAL , NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts shown wiZl reflect only permit;�plan check fee and valuation amounts. . � I�AK,fJTA GOIIIIITY � �� ::.�� :,:°:::::, �� ; +, �:� 111 'uiIiti Servin� People and Communities � April 22, I98� Mr. Revin Frazell City Administrator City o� Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza I}rive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 DAKtJTA COLTNTY HOUSING & REDEYELOPMENT AI;�7[`HURITY 2496 • 145th S7REET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 550b8 612-423-4800 Re: FY 19$7 Cammunity Development Block Grant Funds Dear Revin: On April 1'Ith, Dakota Caunty officially received a FY 1987 Entitlement Cammunity Development Block Grant oi $1,272,000; this is $23,000 or about 2� mare than anticipated. This will result in all projects receiving a slight increase based on a pro-rated method. - ,� Therefore, the City o� Mendota Heights will receive $72,159 for housing rehabilitation. The County Board approved the Grant Agreement at their April 21st meeting and we may now begin expending the funds. The Dakata Caunty IiRA Staff will be implementing the Mendata Hea.ghts pragram as soan as possible. We will make sure to keep you appraised of our progress with this important praject. Please call me if you have any questions. ` ce 1 , Mark S. Ulf rs � Executi.ve Director MU:tp "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" e APRIL 27, 1987 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fr��,�ity Administrator / SUBJECT: Divine Redeemer Regarding Ambulance Service I have received the attached letter from Divine Redeemer, notifying us of a change in their provis�on;: of a third ambulance in our Fire Station during the night time hours. This change is fully in compliance with their contract with the nine cities, since that contract specifies that they will provide only two ambulances. They voluntarily agreed to continue the third ambulance after they discontinued service to the Apple Valley/Burnsville-area over a year4ago. ACTION REQUIRED: This memo is for informational purposes only, and no further Council action is required. KDF:madlr � attachment � . � ��}� `;i:�.=,-, �,. � ,•�' i., ��._ � � ;::• , �� . � °' � �,�'�r� , r � �rn•.;: � April 22, 1987 :- ._ :.�,•.... ;.. : � DIVINE REDEEMER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL � 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 (612) 450-4500 APR � � 1�$7 Kevin Frazell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 750 S . Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 - Dear Mr. Frazell: I'm writing this letter to inform you of a change in our ambulance coverage. Between the hours of 7:00 a. m. and 11:00 p. m., we will be operating three paramedic ambulances. From 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., we will be staffing two paramedic ambulances, one in South St. Paul and one in Eagan. This change is in compliance with our written agreement and will not jeopardize ambulance service in your city . The third ambulance has been averaging only three calls per month during these nighttime hours . These calls can be handled by our other two ambulances . These hour reductions can ultimately reduce additional expense to the patients. The statistics are monitored closely and as call volume increases, so will our staffing . If you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely, �� Milton Hertel Senior Assistant Administrator gk � � An American Healthcare Management Hospital CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 27,�1987 tl TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin .�,r�l , City Administrator SUBJECT: Extension of Office Lease with DCR Corporation The City currently leases slightly more than 5,000 square feet of space in the Dakota County State Bank Building under a lease that was originally entered August 1, 1984. Our current per square foot cost is $9.84 plus any increase in property taxes over the base year. The lease contains a two year extension option at the rate of $10.09 per square foot beginning this August 1 and running for a two year period. Because of the decision to build a new-�City Hall, it did not seem to me that we would need to exercise a two year lease extension. Rather, I anticipated, and our architects agree, that we should plan on a move-in date around August 1, 1988. The people from DCR Corporation have agreed to give us a one year extension on the lease at the $10.09 figure, and to allow us to continue our rent on a month-to-month basis after that date should we not be quite ready to move in. The rate of $10.09 per square foot appears to be quite reasonable compared to rates that are being charged for other space in the northern Dakota County area. � ACTION REQUIRED: , To pass a motion ratifying the one year extension of the office space lease with DCR Corporation at the figure of $10.09 per square foot. KDF:madlr __._... 5(5/87,_CLAITLS LIST �__.._.,_.��_.____._ Dept 10-Admin , Dept Sp-Rd6Bridge � -15-Engr- --•---- 60-Uti1� t:?es ---------- ,,�` Pt}-Folice 70-Park _ � Unoaid Detaiied Check Regiscyyr�� _30-Fic'e---$Q-P2annistg -------Page 2 q Y ! City of Mendata Height �- � 40-CEO 9Q-Animal Contral Invoice � P.O. Gheck� Invoice Number Number Final Date Rccount Code Amount a�6 Arnesan Fuel Oi 1 9ervice - -�� 2228� --- � .--�-- � � - � ---� y� 6 @I2�10 ��_�-�� _- � 2i 754_ 00-- Invoice Tatal 2,754.00 Check Total 2.754.00 a07_ATBT ,,, 36629 E 01421005050 B.36 E 01421007070 8.36 _,� _ E 25421006060 8.37 E 01k21008fD20 3.96 Invoice Tatal 29.05 ._, Cheak Tatal 29.05 2�Q8 BB.i Auto Supplv 63f99 E 0143s046030 9.30 E 01433@49050 1.26 E 01433049070 11.26 r E 15433045060 . S�`- Irtvoice Total 43.07 63304 E 01430507070 12.96 Invoice Total 6.05 63694 E 014a05@7070 31.56 Invaice Tatal $7.61 _ _ Check Tatal 87.61 di7#Git�hl4.tar ��.�ly 29i594 E 01430505050 c5.28 E 014s@Sfd707td �5.2� E 15430506PJ60 25.27 Invaice Total 75.83 A29 DCR Carp � � E@1420060010 �� 1,601.00 _ E IIt142@@6tb020 905.00 E 05420060015 1�664.00 Invoice Total 4,170.00 Gheck Total 4 170.0Q1 a3Q,.,jZonnia ❑eZmont E 01k41502020 120.00 E @14490ib2020 �3.34 � " Invoice 7ota1 143.34 Check Total 143.34 �l�33,_,Execsi$.�n�)/+`it ems 4�9y �,_@,,,b z330�,90 �,0 60. 0Q Invoice 7ota1 -- 60.00 4 -- «�- �-�.� . Check Total 60. 00 �- Kevin Frazell E 0ik4i511010 175.00 � r�vsi�Q...1:At� 1 1Z5. S'�0 ( ti''"l�'.-` ��'S'a. h�: F `�,yy.. r��ti.. _ . .. . ' �� . ....y:G� '4. 't'?"z: ..'T_ e ' • " ' " " . . . . . . . . _ -, .. ?s: ;F.' � ...t.. `l; ,.-�!, % +� T �r *�%'+,6'.;.^'„�-"'- .r:SWsr':' a:_ �� 't� " � "nai " f`- �;r �Nr- z� :t ' .+' �v �u:., .x ��'�F-.6J �,�k � =��:''J � '�,�C „;� ,.�'gt,�-,..'�;^'� �';+� a''`'�� erf,a.::l�'=�: �,.ti+w•�2,�:1.�;,'sw;�'�c;'ta ��r..� � Y ..if�>,..+. _. �t'v'p'�L . .%:.:.'�.,. J � � � �y�. .'"A`/ � i'.a',`. i,iq`,� ..r,.. _Linpaid Detailed_Checl�Regi�t M City of Mendota Heights Page_.�� Invoice p.0. Check Znvaice ndar Number --.Number-Final--Date -flccount--Gode -Amounb- Check 7pta2 175.�II� �046 ICMR E 0i440203030 14.75 _...,,... � rzx�ic�S4t.a1�____._ _�_14._Zs a1 +44Z5 �049 ZCMR f2C --- ---------------- ,_„_6 01_2Qt72 _ 1,09.6Qt �- E 01413411010 73.95 ___.... ____-__.__ _------------_.._.. ---G_0i2072._. __. ��._---. -- -109.60�_.� E ?l1413421010 ?3.95 __ _ _ Invoice Total 367.10 -` - --- Chec�c '[c�a� 367_3.4! i056 Paul Kaiser _ ,_ E Q1H26815030 936.00 Ir�voice Total 906.00 � Check Total 936.00 i059 Tcm Knuth E 05441520515 10.0Q! � E 5144f59250@ 2.iQt E 954415B^-�..200 25.62 __ E 85441582900 4.20 ' E 284415837@0 13.44 _ ___ �^__ E 29442583800 13.23 �E 31 k41583900 30. 0.� E 32441584000 4.2@ � Znvoice Total 102.82 Tatal 102.82 iQ64 Lakeland Fard 27272 E 0i433@48030 2,26i.@6 Invoice Total 2.261.06 Check Sotal 2 261.66 i067 Leef Hros Inc 477416 ^__ � E 01433531050 _ 9.35 E 014335,^si070 9.35 E 1543s'S310b0 9.30 � � Invoice Total 28.00 � Check Total �8.00 i@66 LELS � � • - G @12075 148.00 Znvoice Tota2 148.00 _ 1 Check To�al 148.00 i069 �MCZT FiP CIO EBP 04233 6 4+12074 7.38 � E @141310c"'020 � � 369.43 G 012074 140.31 � � E GJ14131A12020 �"��109.74 " ` ' - - ' - I»vaice Total 626.86 1 t�,i�•• .-�;'x'.�"'.,�� - _ •- ~y,C.w, a�f` . �' . .. �J.� . �) }, tY,:i_ n � . . ♦ . . . . �i'2zA. ? S I. � • r .'.u:qi x'"}tse�an � s..rr �� ` - r, i y�r�'+r"., i ' - .'�{y _ . t � .�I ^� y. .`^i � G nbe. • y��=1 l ,k�.' ..,'�r.! „�,•" €. ''tw." '�4..' . L"�. .:��,•Rb.` • �,n�• . . :a � {�Sr. d :}}w'�"�I:Y.Y'�� '��vr. Y Y ��-^ .�u t . �,+'"' �;.•;s-� a�W �„ .d� •r+�, .t',�£ i`.f �'' �M1y�,y �e-y.'�`�;• �.�-..., ' : i.4i' 4 'rG`W:' f• ^k- p C'.": ?�y ��i.t_ �� Y `�i� i� YT %'z:.ek T1., y'�, �• f.' 4 y'S.,+`<.� J !x�:�e ��A ...�-�E.�J ndor Unpaid_Detailed Check Register City of Mendota Heights Page 3 Inyoice P.O. Check Invoice Number Numher Final Date pccount Code _Amount _ --------------------------- ------ --Check Total'--- 626.86 077 Metro Waste Control 4144 E 15444906a60 49,337.30 R 143575 833.33c ' -- R 173575 2,083.33c Invoice Total 46,420.64 Check Total 46�420.64 085 Minn Dept of Revenue 6776 _ ______ E 0143^c005050 ____ _ _____ 10.57 Invoice Total 10.57 Check Total 10.57 086 Minnesota-Conway 11018 E 01463003030 263.25 Invoice Total 263.25 56053 E 01433049020 217.50 nvoice �a 8a-75— Check Total - 5— i0 nn Mutual Life Ins 23198 � �uac�,�-, --- -- E 01413111010 5.10 — ` _ " E 01413102020 • m E 35413106060 1.70 '— E 01413107070 -70 E 05413110515 1.70 - Invoice Total ��-�� --- Check Total 32-:�0 i100 Northwestern Bell Telephone E 01421031530 �2 E 01421005050 37.61 ----�� E 15421006060 � � —�7-�� E 01421007070 37.60 -' E 01421007070 9•76 Invoice Total 239.90 Total 239.90 110Z n t, + u i E 01422180090 135.00 E 01422580090 80.00 Invoice Total ' 215.00 Check Total 215.00 It17 Duane Selander � E 01441520070 40.00 Invoice Total 40.00 Check Total 40. 1118 Seven Corners Rce Hdwe 303664 E 01442005050 25.05 • ' ' Invoice Total 25.05 - ' �:iw - � Y.f'.. f . a.5.:. p � �. _ .1�7. . . . . . . . . •'.SC*�_ _ . . . . . . . r � ..y....." ' ' ' " J ` ' %�-:�`' �,t.< ,.i�{- a; �� i,Yti :r%"�fi:7: `'��'� -::.,rfc;��d"�.i+��r"�`�.t��,t a.f��G�''� iM;:: ;�:��r,�.s� .,�,=:g:;,; .a,:.;";i' i ,w;;=:: ..;: ; � :a+� � ::�' ww 't'�"',:�w�8��.=• ��l'� ~ ��'�''r.� - ' .�.�.�k?f' i; �e...�'��•��•...,;-+.r �o-. r'y` YT��' '�.zj. �y ��.,frf.„{yA. ^'� �,�+;�' . +!�«,. �3 �- t � .id �etailed_Check.Register._ _-- ------ ---pag�4 City of Mendota Heights Invoice P.O. Check Invoice ' �dor -Number Number-F_i.nal-Data-- Accou»t-Cod� Amount Check Total 25.05 120 L E Shaughnessy Jr E 01430011010 47.16 E 014220�3210 37,i.� - �� E 05422013215 84.25 E 2�42�0��200 ��8.10 E 16422013200 20B.25 E 0342201:s200 _ 65.50_ ��- �� E 14422013200 697. 30 E 15422013260 173,20 __ ." ._`- -- ---' ------i --- - - - Invoice Total 2, 3B7. 16 Check Total 2,387.16 123 J L Shiely Co 2547 E 85446082900 153.20 Invoice Total 153_20 Check Total 153.20 126 Snyder Druo Stores 136556 E 01430502020 16.49 --' Invoice Total 16.49 Check Total 16.49 12B 5outhview Chevrolet 148682 E 01433049070 20.04 Invoice Total 20.04 Check Total 20.04 138 Uniforms Unlimited 73B54 E 01441002020 __ 507.90 '"-' --`�- - ' E @14410020�0 44.95 Invoice Total 552.85 552.85 139 United Central Trustee L16976 G 012071 67.65 ' E 01413202020 40.90 E 01413205050 24.10 "`"' E 15413206@6a 12.05 E 01413207070 12.06 - - Invoice Total 156.66 Check Total 155.66 ted Way St Paul r - G 012070 91.00 Invoice Total 91.00 Check Tota il_44 Vikina Industrial Court 265915 E 01430502020 52.25 Invoice Total 52.25 - C'heck Total 52.25 .. .1 �5.. �•.,�ye ..�: ':4:. .J. �i�i. ' -... � _„'.:Y,�y�.J�r:l:,. M,I�....r.n�... - . ., r..-tV .. . - .-,f' ,",ti �5""Q:"�7 " iu:-,'. �a'u'�'.dti%.'..(.". ".i_ '�;,,y� 4.1��"'r, . .'�.:%;.,�:ti;' _7 .r.�.oi .w`.C...iii.f" ;:b,tt. ia:'.,_„'r �,•�;c„>� ' ,.�P .� .i �:�F' ''�r� �,b , v, e.� rf n,.i' � �='` _ M.:.vi. � � •'y�+ J.;'- ,,.p°"�,,. ::�� .:�. ,�� =n; 's'. S�'':.� �� : K}•� �`�...':?3's ��k �^=- `..�c` �` ..^' `;�.^' ''�`.l.% r� _ Unpaid IIetai,2ed Check Register �_y ____� �_� � Page 5�_ City of Mendata Heights � �� Invaice —P. Q._ � �_ Check � Znveice Number Number Final Date pccouni Code Gimount 147 Western L.ife Insurance Ca s'2814i � � �� j y � E@24is2m31s0 � �� ^ 114.80 Invoice Total 114.8Q _ Check Tntal � if4.8¢t 14B Winthroo & Weinstine '_ E 01k22112010 1t500.00 E @1422212@20 3,899_55 __ E 514220925ID0 50.00 E 31422083900 994.86 _,_, ___�_,,, ,___� �^__� _�__ ,____ Invoice Total____� � _ 5, 644. 41 Tatai S,Bk4.41 15� I fl S 17643 E 01430502020 �G9.60 Invoice Total 249.60 Check Total 249.60 203 Metro Area Mgr Rssn E m3440011010 10.00 Invoice 7ota1 10.00 Gheek Total 10.00 9,_ ,�t� G�m $bg�_, 7861 � E 01430502020 112.33 "' _ ++ Fnvoice 7ota1 112.33 Check Total 112.33 412 Baffin LTD 1783 E 0144901f010 346.50 _ E @1426865010 144.45 E 15426885060 75.20 E 2E4z58Es5@0@ 86. b0 E 16426865000 40.2@ Invoice Total 692.95 � 196�, E 014301210f0 i91.tb0 Invoice Total 8$3.95 � Check Tota2 883.95 918 C& G Products 12305 � � E 01460011010 � 1,074.0@ Invoice Total 1,074.00 � _ � Check Totai , — 1,074.00 g�^ -flmm+��4nng�,r .�f ,Tr�pt , Sij,y,$ _E 01422142i50_ ^c1.35 Invoice Total 21.35 Ch�ck Total 21.35 314 Fire Watch Inc 12030 E 01433531530 65.60 Invoice 7ota1 65.00 ' Check Tatral 65.fD0 .'�;r��,.,�. ;.�x,, .i.�-�..v� �.�.. � _,�.,,�...aai_ :�..,�,cr,r. .. . .. _ s�..._.;.-. _ . .. . .. ... ._ . -- -.. . . .. s� Gt�i` �t+b%' r - � .r` �%' k ,� �; _.. ;....: � r . . , ... " . ,.� _..r..» ' . ,�<M,�•, +�: `i ,:v�`ti;,aA �...aF'� .,C,`i.s.i:'v-�ia$�� aK:�i:-�.:tw��!'.�wy, ti�y"..,..�} :� ��..,.�t i�� >iau�-'�;�. ��s` � ;x* �"` �y+ "3'°. a,r, '.'�y7,!'�W,,�`�,::lY, . ��KS s F �- ' M1�,aS.�.�d-1 :pi..e�,v,'�� ri?r<.r ..� `. p .�„r:�l'^`.' .��. -Unpaid.Detaile� Check_Regist C3ty of Mendota Heights Page..6� Snvoice P.O. Check Invaice ndar. ....�Number--.---Plumber--�ina�—Date -Account-•Sode•----- —Amountr --------------------'-----------------------------------'-----------___----------------'------------^'----------------------- i�l.:i �and Care Equipment 8966 w � E@14305+Zr7070 � 22.50 � — Invccxice..,2ota1._,_ _22.5@_ �'hecF�Sat a'� 22_SQ� 1916..Ccmp�e5�9ir� it En „ t820J.9 _ � rni433Q4603� 282..20 I»voice Tota2 282.20 �� ----•~� --`y-- -�l�—~ Check Total 282. 20 19l7 Crawfard Door 3al�s 1221?7 ^ � � � E 01433531050 � � 2$4.0+b . _�._�._ _ E Ql„�3353.},.Q70. 294.00 E 15433531060 284.00 _. _ _ Irivoic��otal 852�00 ,,_ Check Tatal 652_00 tg19 Uavie� Water Equipment 29337 E 154305Q16!D60 133.44 Invoice Total 133.44 Chacfc Totai 133.44 i9 m Match Sales 7030 E 51430592500 164.00 E 014305fD5050 209.07 �` I»voice Tatal 373.07 Check Tatal 373.07 t32Qj Hardware Hank 91 E 0143050707Q � $.01 �_ _ E 01k33531@50 14.13 � Invoice 7ota1 22.ik Check Total 22.14 i421 Kimbail Midwest 37930 �� E@14305Q12020 c^1.32 E 0143ID5413iD30 2f_ _32 E 01430505050 21.32 � _ E 0i4305tD7070 21_32 E 2�430506@60 21.33 _,__ �_,,,___,_,_,� Fnvoice Totai 106.61 Ch�ck Total i06.61 922 Mac Connection 718231 _ E 014600@2020 184.00 _ - � Invoice 7ota1 184.0@ Check Tatal 384.00 . � i923 Newman Signs 31244 E 014420415050 125.0fb � Invoice 7ota3 125.00 _ Check Tatal 125.00 924 Natl Fire Protection Assn � -i8126 E 024402Q303@ ^,�92.50 . .�: _ i -r.. _ ..... _. :i ... , . ...� . . .r . «1� ... .... .. . , ., . ... . . . . . �. .i. . . . .. . •; • ..., . .., s .-.-. .. .. __ " ^,vFw"'q ; a"""'?" '=.:' v:�':�`�'' - �.} 'N-t7: �9S;a •,:c:.yi'sy Yr^�s�'t:�:a.. _ „ssµ; �,4E, . . .." �a: ".:Fex?Jis'',`,�'�.t .��k,�' .r'�" *�'''� r:mt��'S' S,.i �i' '��'r'»� 1.�8t r - 3.�L�r..� � `Fa'':.t:`,'LN•'�. �- ,. m tke,.,�x{�.' �r Y. ;��' :.�%w hy. „H, :Y.u;�;>: �i.:_ �s .�t.:� "'L' �tf ` 7"+A 3` `�.." '%: v� .si•—A . .e5� � . � Unpaid.Deiailed Check Register �_� _ �__ Page ? M� City of Mendota Heights � � Invoice P.fl. � Check � �� -' invoice ndar Number .Number Final Date Account Code Amount Frtvaice Total� � 292.50 Ch�ck Total 925 Natl Guardi�n Security Svc 160210 E 15433049060 171.75 Invoice Total 171.75 E 15k33049415+D 71.24c Invoice 7ata1 100.51 Check Fotai �' � 100.52 926 Pitney Bowes Credit Corp 878158 E 01433049tD20 15'6.00 Invoice 7ota2 156.00 Check Total 1.56.00 �27,_Si�� enter ''c0445 E 0143050�020 155.00 Invoice Totai 55� Check To al . i Pak 1081 E 014330�1570 8'T�� Invoice 7ota1 3&7.00 Chack Total 3$7.0II 929 Z=e �+9edica� SVe 44�c712 E 01430505050 15.90 E 7! f 4305@5�c15Q1 0. @@ � E 01430507070 15.9@ E 1':,4305Q16060 15.85 Invoice Total 47.55 Tatal 47.65 93Q1_R R Wtsitacre & cn ifl60?D0 E 01430507070 14.2t3 Invoice Total 14.f0 }0Er0Q3 E 01433046030 227.81 Znvoice Total 141.91 @6381 E 01Q30507Q70 38.87 Y I»voice Total 1$0.78 - . 180. 78 _ 932 la T& T � E Qf1421@1201+D � 2.57 _„ � E 014210@2Q120 25.23 Invoice Total 27.80 Total 27.80 6rand Tatal �� 74696.92 y�� %r?;:r.: �h„c�-r.k�' -tu.Y.i�it•a'1a01'n' s:}tYt`i` J.` v'+i«,•ar , xr:�.:-� ��'tY..' _ •.�, _ . .. ...'R.i...y.. .. .. - . . . . _ . _. ... .. ,. . a3M- .rM � .a�(c.. x ,.+>h, n,f.rPnRi�. 7j t.�<'-'.. ..r;.:="i t.: -. ....�.� :�i....^ Y�:`.'.y..�.:..,._y;..» _.. _ ._ . . ., . '�r"-B«�!y" . S,yti+<r'.::;�. i''i'� :. `^ . • w3,.h. r > r '�,.,e'1' • -is.,'% fry. y;...«... r.. � � t. �' �,,.�r.� a ��F �+i'?� o?"t,�:iy�''` i�t: , nc.p{��r,�;.x^ #ti.'..'s. ,� � ---- at-�cxECRs-_.._�..�—_ ___.�----- ---- — -- Ii382 65.d0 ZGMA - 87 ComgensaCion Pub2 """" 83�—�530"�T3nn"G'reen Tn3ustry 1tEgr 87`Pariss em'"a� 11384 44.00 Dakota Cty Court Traffic'Fine � ' -'" ��II38'S--s;397�4I""�FERA 1+%TO payiol ' 1I38fi 625.00 Dakota Cty St BA21k 4J24 Payrol2. Deduct3ons _,_... �1387�`3;TJ71':77'--SCC[I`— —��r--�,—�"._�•— __�.. 11388 8,390.47 Dakota Cty St BANk 4/24 Fit, Pica, Medicare .._ —�ZI389 ----2T,727.5$. __Gity M A Payioll Ajc 4724'Net Papro22 "---------"��----- ---_____._.-- kS,846.73 ' G.T. 120,543.65 r� � �"3^;.�,,.� . � � ..,..:,ry�;.. ' .; _ _V� .�.� _ .. : r.��. . ..» .;�{_.s� �:-f}�.. : �:y. .. . _ c.. _ , . ' � ,C! � . i: .�� •r tr�a7, r 'i, ,�+` m' .a•j:i4'y 'i. ;�ic�' .'�;v." �`.'".�.y f�¢ 7f^ Z' •7,��" � 1�'�,,, �k`�ecr � to'i; ;,:r. `' �"^' `s � ,��r�: �''l.�� ..''�Fi+'. �.'c&� � ,^' r�:.y;�y`, y .d �, -. ;Z.+ i, �,,i.: > � ` t`.' �� r� � t�''� 'Sit�<�c,. �,. '`�. 1� � i.4;��. •.,'�"� .:J`f�s�'h�.-.:�_:= • 4' � LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL -- - --- - - -- OI�f- MAY 5 ,1987 -- - - - - -- - - - Excavating License: Bob Freiermuth Sanitation Maplewood Sewer and Water Rauchwarter Inc: - Fencin License: Able Fence Inc. General Contractor's Licenses: Arteka Joseph D. Farrington Exteriors Lake Region Construction 0'Malley Construction Co. Dan Dietrich Construction Inc. Eagle Fire Protection Co. J. A. Development Doug Speedling Wenzel Plumbing & Heating Inc. Gas Pi in License: Stein Air Earl Arneson, Jr. All American Mechanical Inc. P�asonry License: Carlson Masonry Dahn Buiders, Inc. Beaver Construction Asphalt Specialties E. L. Bulach Construction Co. Inc. , 1987 Cigarette Licenses to be Approved � City Council: .Twin City Vending Co., Inc. Mendota Country Club Inc. DUt�i Inc. , 1987 Rubbish Haulers Licenses: Roadway Rubbish � Triangle Services _ __ CZTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - MEMO April 30, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Councii and City Adm s�.�/"„` � FROM: James"E. Danielson " Public Woxks Director SIiFiJECfi: Sanitaxy Sewers and Water Services Valley Curve Estates Job No. 8617 . Improvexnent No. $6, Project Na. 5 Sewers, Water, Streets Spring Creek Acres Sab No. 8703 Improvement No. 87, Project No. 1 DISCUSSION: Bids for the Spring Creek Acres/Val:ley Curve Estates projects were initially opened on April 3, I.987 but were rejec�ed because they were 60 percen�. over the Engineer's Estimate. Bids are being reopened Monday, May 4th at 1.0.�}O:A.M. and will. be available Tuesday evening. 6 CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO T0: Mayar, City Council and City i s r Gor FRQM: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SUBJECT: Copperfield III Case No. 87-03 DISCUSSION: Aampton Estates Case No. 87-04 April 3Q, I9$7 p The Planning Comruission conducted the required public hearing for the rezoning and subda.visian of the Copperfield III and Hampton Estates plaCs aC their March and April meetirigs (see attached staff ineznos). RE CONI�'lENI}ATI dN : The Planning Commissian voted unan�mausly to recommend that the City Council approval of the rezona.ng of the properties from R-1A ta R-1, the approval of �,he conditional use permit for the planned unit development and approval af the preli.minary p1at. AIl these recom- mendatians were subject to the Cityts adaption of.the aircraft noise �, ordinance and Metrapolitan Council approval of the Compreherisive Plarn Amendmen.t. NOTE: The State Legi.slature still has not acted on the enabling legisla�ion for the aircraft noise.ordinance and Met Council has not ye� acted on the Cityfs request for 'partial appraval of the Soutfieast area study {�orth of Mendota Heights Road & east of Huber Drive). ACTION REQUZRED: ConducC the required public hearings for the rezoning and the canditional use permi� for the planned unit deve3opmen.t and then if Council desires to implement the Planning Cammission recornmendation they should either: . � 1. Tab1.e the reques� until such time as the State o� Minneso�a enacts the enabling legisl,ation for the naise ordinance and and the Met Council'approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment ar; 2. Approve the plans subject to the State enacting enabling Iega,slation and Met Councii approving the Comprehensive , Plan Amendment. . . ,-,..,.:.,�,._. � .. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR REZONING, SUBDIVISION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 24, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will meet at approximately 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, May 5, 1987, in the City Hall Council Chambers to consider a request from Copperfield Associates, R.A. Putnam & Associates/Tandem Corporation for a rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for a planned unit development for part of the SE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, and for outlots A, B, & C, Copperfield 2nd Addition. More particularly, this property is located at 2365 Delaware and is more generally located in the area of Huber Drive, Pond View Drive and Delaware Avenue. - v This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinances No. 301 and 402. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed requests will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk , � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 23, 1987 � TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg SUBJECT: CASE NO. 87-03 and 87-04, Tandem/Hampshire Estates DISCUSSION• Mr. Dick Putnam appeared before the Commission last month and presented Copperfield III Addition, (which is the last addition), and the Hampshire Estates subdivision. At that hearing, there were some concerns about the park dedication and other staff generated concerns. The matter was continued to the April meeting to allow the developer time to address those concerns. 1. Park Dedication - Mr. Putnam has reconfigured the park to increase its size to the minimum amount - � required by ordinance. 2. Lot frontages have now been called out for all the lots as requested. 3. Several of the lots along the ponds have been eliminated and streets realigned to provide more yard area for lots which abut ponds. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct the continued public hearing to consider rezoning and subdivision approvals and make a recommendation to the City Council� Remember, all approvals need to be made contingent upon compliance with the soon to be adopted Noise Ordinance. JED/PRB:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MARCH 18, 19897 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg " P.W. Director Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: CASE NO. 87-03, Copperfield III, Subdivision and Rezoning DISCUSSION• Mr. Dick Putnam has already sold out Copperfield Phase II and has made application for the third and final phase of the Copperfield development. He has attached a letter of explanation that describes the application rec�uest. Staff will only make comments on points of concern, which are as follows: 1. A number of the lots abut ponds within the Phase III area. Individual wetlands permits will need to be considered for all construction within 100 feet of the ponds. 2. Lot frontages at the setback line have not been called " out. However, as was the case with the previous phases of the subdivision, several�of the lots do not have the required 100 feet of frontage. In the PUD approval, a blanket approval would be granted for the substandard lots. 3. At the intersection of Copperfield Drive and Field Stone Drive, three lots from Phase II are being replatted to change the alignment of Copperfield Drive. 4. This phase of Copperfield appears to be a continuation of the first two phases, which have been extremely successful. Staff will again not have the time to complete the.engineering for the public improvements and will be recommending that an agreement be prepared allowing the Developer to install his own. ACTION REQUIRED Conduct a public hearing considering rezoning and subdivision approvals and make a recommendation to the City Council. Remember that Copperfield Phase III falls within the Airport noise zone IV and any approvals need to be made contingent on compliance with the soon to be adopted noise'ordinance. JED/PRB:madlr PLANNING REPCIRT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLIGANT: LOCATIC}I�i: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING GONSIDERATIONS: � 24 March 1987 87-03 Capperfield Associates Between Nuber Drive and Delaware Avenue (see sketch) Approval of rezoning from R-lA ta R-1 and Preliminary Plat 1, As you knaw, the Tandem Corparation, as principally represented by Dick Putnam {farmer planning director of the City of Eden Prairie}, has successfully developed Capperfield additions One and Two in an area of Iand generally south and east of Huber Drive. Mr. Puinam now proposes to the platting of the remaining 50.6 acres of the initial properties awned by the Opus Corporation. TF�e proposa! is to develop 70 lots with an average lot area of 20,000 square feet. The minimum lot area is 15,00� square feet as prescribed in the R-1 District proposed for the site. The design concep�, lot sizes; marketin"g strategy, and hausing evaluation are anticipated to be an extension of the Copperfield One and Two additians. 2, Attached is a six page statement wiih a reduced drawing expiaining the development proposal for the property. The preliminary plat submitted is in conformance with the ' overal! cancept plans ihat have been reviewed by the City Planning Commission and Gouncil " on several occasions in the past. Mr. Putnam also proposes to develop the land to the souti� which wiil contain a park area accessibie frorn the piatted area in question off Watersedge Terrace. This access as previously discussed at rr�eetings of the Planning Cammissian and Cauncil is Iocated between Lots 9 and 10 on Block--(there are no black designations on the plat}. In any case, the access is lacated between the two ponds near the sauth center area of the SO acre site. , 3. We da not have the precise park dedication calculations, but we will determine these prior to the Planning Commission and Cauncil meeting. As prearranged pracedure, this piat wiil be passed on to the Park Baard for their review as a part of the development approval process. You wtll recail, however, that �t was the pian io develop a park area between the two ponds dawn to the extension of Mendota Heights Road. These precise acreage and allocation of contribution for the total area witl be calculated. � � COPPERFIELD ASSOCIATES, CASE 87-03 PAGE Z - 4. As shown in Mr. Putnam's statement, they propose a series of S lots on a cul-de-sac labelled "Field Stone Court" to have distances less than 100 feet from the shoreline of the two ponds on either side of the peninsula occupied by the cul-de-sac. You will note that the building envelope for these lots lies extremely close to the shoreline. Southeast of the cul-de-sac, this distance is as little as 25 feet. We suggest that - Mr. Putnam be requested to consider an adjustment to the design of this cul-de-sac possibly using three techniques to reduce the distance from the perspective homes to .the water's edge: 1. Reduce the radius of the cul-de-sac right-of-way from 60 feet to 50 feet. 2. Shorten the cul-de-sac by approximately 100 feet. 3. Reduce the number of lots served by the cul-de-sac by one. _._ _ The impact of this redesign should be to pull some of the homes substantially further from the water's edge and reduce what would appear to be a"crowded" condition when the homes are completed. . These are principally walkout lots, therefore, the homes may be up to three stories high as viewed from the water area. The down side to this move is the loss of a lot--though, hopefully, the value of some of the lots will be substantially increased by making them more buildable on the water's edge. 5. In the overall development proposal appears to be consistent with that which has been previously and successfully done. The adoption of the airport noise control ordinance should pave the way for the approval of this development proposal, subject to the considerations outlined. , Y-. �j , � '�'.''.: _.. tT--<, - - 1. ::.� �1 .� �. ,` ++i (` I � 4 %/ � ' � n` ��/ V / 1 . + • • I � ' • ' "=`-��---� i '`_� j --� � .•. ' -� 1 , " � . _ =O; •" ..•, .� � �, __. 1 � r� __ __. , . Z , � ' ( � \ _ __� � � '� �'� s ''. �i� ._ r ` • • I � �.. �. _ i n \ r .N :. _: •• �: • � _ � i • 7"t , . _1 �_ • � }y ,I � � �''� ^ -� -.�'' � � � � '� . `a • • •'�`' � / ______'__-�`_ —•�, _—..._... _.L . � � Y _ - '_ � �_J: • � \ j � � +\ M � � ( � � e t � �"_`'''� % . ": l� � ' � I r+��•;.. ' ' , ; _ ' . a .� � � . � - ,. � y o � , ; 1 , :�'' � t TM 1FM A �r WWLA CO �� R45CY;MT � i �� , • � . �. �..�_ __. i� �� ' - z x �'a� l' � � t „_ ._ Z'• �+�ir�r '\ '` � 1 a . + � N Y MARSH ; ' • • • ! � � . 1 - � i '.i : . ' �• + ;�rs • • � � � I PARK • � o- ' _._ .� _. . .__ i t-- ' -,'��.'.. r '_ ' • � . • . �. . . ` . i ' i � - � � .�� . � ' �• • f�" � • \ \' � i � ��'. � � � '•'! . �_ � � ��.. . » . .. �+.i� . .e • .,,, �,,,�} ' �t � . �. ,�/• � ' , �� ,"..�'"� % ..;�.;;w.•;: 4' . . y. . , :� �� . • i � � _ � � �'� ' •�, r ' . ;. .• -_ - .` � - .! -_� . _— . .' +� - �. - / — - —� �. � . , . , . • � / _ —, �� ' ' ' ' �. * . . r • � • - „� _ ,::;; • . % �:.� ::``':':;r'::�:�::�:�':'':':::::::: ' �'y s � J / �- _ ::$"�:::<::`'`.'.:';':; ....::.:.::.:: , . O� � � • � � • • •• � � � � c _ . � :;:;'1�. �.dfr!.ri ` t. • •;:%s„ ;�3G�:•5:;::i�:':�; �: A . • � ,4 • r � � �:.::..:..:.'.:.:.; �.,-•:::..:.: •: � �, - • • • / � � �: �0::'�`''<:' P . ' � K K • ��M r � ' • • c� {:',�,<�S:}�}'r '.SA•' E�M- 4 . � j .:�::�•�-�� ! . . . ' � • , . �j :;:;�:::::.;:. _• F I ;� .:::�.::::.;:'�::,.' . + � � .'Y'''"".':. ': .' . �.,... � ;,. . . . � /.: �';::��::'��i:->.,;'�.::<;�:;::::�. _ . '. „ �.� . � . • � , f i -- � ' ��{�.• � � . � • • • • s • • 4 • �t:Y.,�:y;..t^:aY,C'';.S�c`i;i:•}:y�iY�'; },: d • � J` ! �'- " � w�'�c�'x�- .. ��t��•.i:;::- t • R. � `r. ,y ' � yr � ,g . • a � 4 _.;�;.. �: ;:;.{:;:;�' o . , . . � f P 1� w ./ r.� ;,}•;.� \ �:•. �. . • ..:' r ? m C�~�?��`:`�r:'�3:::;:;�;'"''i: i;S:;= . . c e .:.:.:::.::.:• • e� a \ t • :�'� � � m ..Y:::•}:•. �Y • ............f::. �: ' •:::.� •. i • :'r'',:;-'�' j;:;:;r }:%.': +�+� A�'�;'.:;:;r ��: �� Rn�oers' 1 �� ''�.•..� •:::.; • �.`-: •r . 4 . .� ,.� • .}::o;::::: �:::{.};.y:{�}w:.;�,.,:::. • � • I • � .� • •.v : : ri �ii?'i'r:�'r' ��'r??'�:=i �ii[='�}';::{ . . • . ::..::: .... ;.;• :....::.::.::: ••:.;::: :�: :..:::::::.:.: •. ..; ;�' . .. . • ...v'�v�o�::.. • A FA • - ♦ :�i'::Sv'•i} � • • • }i'�`.�.'.:i'ry:;?:;: • � 1 3 1 . �i� tt '� �fY��M'vWC/'f �• « _—„�. .�Y...,l:�'..�`..�.�. ::` •�'�r. . +! �`� •�t SUBJECT PROPERTY � �`�� F;��'.:�:.:. .- � ,, . , � NORTH � �� ._._.___. . _. ...__. :.:�;�: . �, �� __ ��:,:. SCALE 1"= $OC1' '�' .�' . f�ry Id" �. �.�, nAC"`. .h� :.G,'StX�.�N.• . /.`s� �-�,\ r �� ,' � � � _ _, - ,,e�� - _ \ ♦ •� _ r _ � V . .9�. •' �C ' - _ �' � �� xaO.ix' ' t. _ ... _ Co � _ '_ " ' � - . `' "�' = r� �' �_ • � ��f r�-- `..�u�' ��- � ;� �l ( �� ll ,,, �(�'t,`, " �' 'c=� — �;.=_`1`� , �j = , ..:.. �� `\y� � — -- � � ' ��_,,c��'°I - , *`.?�.;,� � .��, �_- � .. �� ^ �� : ...:� - ..� .:c .F '� � � _.:"_` a ^ . " �' � .. :�, s�„� = •: ' •� �t� , . ,. • . , ' � .� � � � Jt �a'.. � " . r��(� .... � � ��' LU N M V ..��P. `"' � ` �1 :. Y s' �, ,f.fiy;' - � �— ,.�:��„e � .. . . . , -�: ...�, • .. _ �,� , '�'. �: •��.,�.�, �? —�: _� A � � • ' � J . . . . . • �� "'t...� ttia . . . . . . � . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . , . • ' -- � � �`-.� ;�r•- � � I t�r'^ � \ �� / � � � /,��,�� ♦ � � � . .` 1 \,�R I , �i � \1 ��- � � ..� � 1 \.. � ,= � ; _ __ t,, 1� � 1 ( 1 � � t � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: • 28 April 1987 87-04 Tandem/King - East of Huber Drive and ,�West of Delaware Avenue, ' Approximately 800 Feet North of Mendota Heights Road Rezoning and Subdivision Approval 1. This hearing was continued at the March 24th meeting. One of the principal issues that was identified for resolution prior to the reconsideration of this item was that of park dedication. This has been a matter of considerable discussion between the applicants and the staff and was reviewed by the Parks Commission recently. The proposed park dedication includes a total of 5.73 acres of dry buildable park land and has been recommended for approval by the Parks Commission. 2. As presented, the proposed plan is consistent with the Southeast Area Study. Both the Copperfield 3rd Ad�dition and the Hampshire Estates have average lot sized .in excess of 20,000 square feet. All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the required performance standards in the R-1 Zoning District. 3. The City Council is schedule.d to act on the proposed Airport Noise Ordinance in the near future. When this has occurred, the City will inform the Metropolitan Council and request that they approve the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment. This approval will represent the final obstacle to the approval of this proposal. • 0 L` 0 � �.,\� . �• c • r �.�" •� -. • 'y �_ �.d. � `�' _ "I +ilr �, I I " . � � . �e . , . �. . � 'L • 1 / " / , � � . • • ♦ i � �� :�. � � .-1. • �fl� •' __ _ \ � � ,• � z• _ I ts,, _____-' \ _/'_^ l � � ��_ l ♦ _. ... . .... . -- � •� _• I � � �`ti-- 1 � � • '.\' . �•� . •t • + � � S � , •-1 i.�:i� w i \ �. _� \. � � � �� . I �' _.� • ,��i�� 1 \ I `�i ' � � '" ��I ��--L_ �ii � �' }... l�--' •7•' � `/ � ,I'/ �` � � , � , � i 'C 11_ '-. .�' . •' �'��A h � \� �" r--------�-��` �- -----• - �� -`�� - - - • - cn �� : ` �� ; I ! � � - ( �i. i; •' ' � '�� r ' ; � -• Q • � , ; � \ "�' �, � ' o I '. � � � � • �`��ry ` - ` �w ""i � rn __ oowee CO .�, c�s[M[wr � I I • ' - �`Y�C� � �. • _ 1.�..�M I ►•�T�__"' � '� ��•• . Y _, ' _� . •�: ' • i . � r 1 "�; � `` ��RlENOLY MARSH . � - • l�. � �t� �' '�;� 1 �lli' � . , i • I . - •�'7�s.•`'��-� � • :1� � .� i� � PARK • � e I ' :� i _. .X � r .� • �� I . .__ ..•-_-----1— • 1• . — (� � : ;�C " ` ` --_ _ ' ��. . ,� ' �.i� n . �`-_ \. i • � �- ��'. j .;1;"• . • s ,. : �----�� , � . _. 'f�:- � • :;• :,•..;• I y�`T' - ��'� � �� i .;� . '� ,• K. / • " .. +' � � �.' � � - - - � _ __��..c--;.:."�;,:":;�::::y�;•`•':�::::2:=:: a . ' r � ,� :,�,• • • , __� ---_ . ...\• � • •,Y ,<. _ � � rI � ♦ • G - � __ _ : 1 . • � • / �. � �• • • Q _ > � ' ^� -�� . F S / � F: � i 9�Y S � / / �� '- - : K{.}i.�'r�'[{.ri}}�'['''ir.�r�?'''i:: <'''�: I. . �+ • • • , a� , • � , _ � / - ! � _ ::;:�;;�......; y,�•o: •.:;:: •::: :': ' . ' ao. � : �c ?�r.:::: •:;;;<;.; y � 1 ; �" � '• • � , --. / i�r: {��i:;::::�ii; :'�:`•:�'::.'� � ..,:.::.;;.. �a �;: a • • 'K� . � �. C c. - _ �:::•:�;':;:�:�:�;:� � �,� P K • • ' y, '• ,�. • • /� • ��. '.�?s��):' ;�:`:+:::: 4 E µ I • _ •'�..''�''�::�3:j:::::•::r:�:::: ' . � ��•;;ti;:•;;::;.::••:•;:;f:::,: •::.; . e . � �� _ _- •:::2`v::�i:•:: � •:. ' � :' W : c • • ' � 1 ::+•`.!> ��:'•'' . • Qv � � � �� ;:;�;��`.•• ��:'rr3t�:�:: y�:r 3 ,� •� � � ( � . Y...•i:':;: y{::�;':;i�r:'t�::;:::�.��:�: Q , . ' �� . � •-� �,y l �,1 �' � � / '"�•:y�: ��' :`:'�:::��: . . • a` � � � 1� � W , j '<:i�? ' :;;:;:;�:;: o :. • � . �,r t m ��:� - �i>i;:: •' . � � I 'r �%uz-"""..��'�'��:•.�. �•: t \ � � ��::r::�:�`�.��.�'k:;:;�;�'�'::':::��;:;;;�x;::�::�:�'��::��r`��.�'�:�:�... weovc:. vrao � • • tr ' I .i . � �: : . _ . �. .•. . ::::�::>s:::::::::.. �:>` --�� .` •, P I A A :�._l<'.:':r':'' • •• - • • - � � � ;: i�r.};T`.>? `•: � l ;..�.: � �°'•' "— • �i:t�� ~ • ii� `�Oe .5�� uMWCf1 •:{•:i'. �� Y�Z[l T. :�'�� • C :: }}4i'•v,,, : }} •. � i}}?:{�: : i:??� �.i?�i�'�i'r'�"�!5?i:: . . .. . �i ' 'r.}:iii:i}\: v.}, w::.?'4' :}}iii}i:{{�'•:-�.��'.J}i}i}ii ' � - • :::::::::.'�.'"..+:. ..� .:.�:::::t•.�::::::::: - _ Sl1 B • . JECT P R P . �: . O E RT Y E� � — ' = — ::�:::::�::::`'��:��:�:::::;::�::::::::�� :::::::::::::::::::::::::�:>::::::::�<:��:::::::::::::::�:�Y:::::�::�:::::::::::;:::::::::;:::::_;<::>:::::::::::: : ::.�: . . .. �. ' � NORTH T . �::�: :�::..:: -: .:. .. , ,,n._�...:.::��..:::::��:u��.�::�:��=�.�:::_�:�:��:� .... SCALE 1"= 800' ��:• t �.. �:�- :� .............. . �_ _ : � . :, �� ;ar-. . -{�:;,,�� -- �� ;, /� �� • ,`4 � � _ �� . � - � __ __ =�l ��; . � T� _. ... _ ROAD ALIGNMENT DIFFERS ON PLAT MA� ' � � p , � �� _ : � : . �I • � . �y . � �� f � 's � �a 1 � � � F �__! ti: • U �„ � , ,; t3``�_=- ,� - = � � � ' � _ _- • _' ' �. ;� ` s , _.t -;•' r- , . • _ � �. __ �• �� . - �-_ ;s».r� � �� — �y ^\ " - •`•; ' , � rt � � ' ^ •'9 w II'�.�� ,T_ � '"!� .y�. l % � 1� �� ._ ' _ �' .. � y .... ... . . . . .... . ."_ _ ...� ' .. . � _ _ �_ ,;C . . . , . - .r�3. �� l�. . - =3-� - - �u€" N `` — - — �� ' • . .' . - :.�:ty .. — � �..�' ' ' -- ~. .,�:, �� -_;: . � : ' _ �a•, ' . ':','. " ' ' :'� a . . , .. . . . • . . . .. . • . .. . . . . . . � '. � , . :��i: . . -�„�'�: --_ -�:: �_- .•` . ,�,�,�� , � _. � ,' �`7 I � , � ` . . - '� �``� � . . � - � �t�� _�_ : . , , �� 1:,, ; � �, � ;, � �� — � , I \ �� .. ,, � � . ;_-_ = ; � € . , ' ��. TO: Mayor cmd City Cowi.cil o f Mendota Hei,qhts �wi Plm�tning mzd Zonin,q Commission of Mendota Heights DATE: February 27, 1987 FROM: Dick Putnam, Steve Ryan Copperfield Associates ' RE: 3�i phase of Copperfield, Mendota Heiqhts Ladies c�d Gentiemen: It is a pieasure to be requesting your consideration of our Copperfield 3rd phase. The response by home buyers and buiiders has been very encoura,qing, so much so that we currentiy have 5 of 53 iots in the 2nd phase unsoid. The sales pace of the Ist and 2nd phases of Copperfield has created a demand for be,qinninq Copperfield 3rd Addition. Perhaps the best description o f our 3rri phase plat is that "if it isn't broken, don't fix it." The success of Copperfieid to date gives us confidence in our desi,gn approach, marketing strate,qy, lot size and public improve desiqn. We believe a continuation of the same approach and standards in the proposed 3rYi phase lviil compiete the neighhorhood as anticipated by the city and Ist and 2nd phase homeowners/ buiiders. Requested Public Decisions Copperfieid Associates, a Minnesota partnership of Tandem Corporation and Lyman Lumber Company, request that the City o f hlendota Heights approve the foilowin,q actions: 1. Rezone 50.6 acres from R-1A to R-1 PUD the same as Copperfield 1st and 2rtd Additions. 2. Approve the Preiiminary Piat for Copperfield 3ni Addition for 70 lots on 50.6 acres. Copperfield Plan The success of a given project is not only measured by its saies or appearance but how it achieves its original objectives. T'he following Goals and Concept Pian is taken from our ori,qinal 1985 A2endota Farms PUD application. Reviewing the Ten Goals for the project will provide you another "yardstick" with which to evaluate Copperfield. Copperfield 3�i Addition The Copperfield 3r� A.ddition Preliminary PIat is similar to the proposed "future additions" illustrated in the 2nd Addition plat. The plat has been planned with the Kin,q property (Hampshire Estates Addition) to better work with the site features and accomplish the cities park objectives. � The 3rd Addition wiil continue the Scenic Easement around all ponds begun in the lst and 2nd Additions and wiil maintain lot sizes, sethacks covenants and architectural review standards. The only possible exception to the setback standards would be on the iots where the rear of homes ma,ybe iess than 100 feet from the established pond edge. The variances from the 100 foot standard is brought about by the land configuration between the ponds and the desire for a public street rather than a shared private driveway. The following lot standards are proposed for the Copperfieid 3rd Addition: Height Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Setbacks 2 Story 15, 000 sq. ft. 90 feet 130 feet Front Side Rear Maximum Minimum at front Minimum 30ft. lOft. 30ft. (3 on rear set back. Minimum wa lk-out Minimum Rear setback on ponds basement) . Iots 100 feet except 8 lots The oniy reduction in the normal R-1 standard is the lot width, which we propose to vary from 90 to 150 feet measured at the building set back. The variety in lot width provides lots taiiored to different home styies and creates an interesting street view. SITE AND LOT DATA Minimum/Maximum Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Size Gross Site Area Pond Area Proposed Street Area Net Buildable Area Gross Site Density Net Site Density Pubiic Park Conclusion Copperfield Associates is success has been qreatiy buyers, the stronq ioyalty within the community, the high qualit,y reputation. 20,000 sq. ft. 50.6 Acres 8. 9 Acres 7.92 Acres 33.57 Acres 1.38 Unit/Acre 1.6 Unit/Acre . 23 (Gross Minus Streets) pleased to be presentinq our 3rd phase. Copperfield's influenced by low interest rates, demand by move-up by existing Mendota Heiqhts residents to build again desirable location of Copperfield and Mendota Heights' We look forlvarol to continued cooperation with everyone in the nei,qhborhood, City staff and communit,y officials to complete the Copperfield neighborhood. Since re iy, for Copperfieid Associates .' �.�-----.. ��.�.��:-.. , :� Dick Putnam Steve Ryan ��. �., i .i.� � ,rl ��.� .,,� �,,._. ,� '; s` °M! '� . -, r ,`� �� '�l� \ail" '', �-- �l 1 I -• y�� (�,� !`' ~ � ' � '�.1 �_•' , 1 r �� 1 E �: f • y rVi i.� '. �j; }�.s"� .�.. , �� ., ' , . � ,•�� ', l; I � �� ° ` � s: � �� .�....' '' ' ! s/�'� . '' /% � I , i� �� ti,` `��\` . � � j �'�"r ��i%. rl�iJf ,� j i�r ,t�" ;,� , '�^w;� 1 �'v�sy ��" •,. ' j j �1� (�_ � t� { ��. �� i�ti �'" /� � _,� �� ^r�s`'� �""'i % /. � �• \`� �%/ .��/� / � ' ' `` � /// � 4 \� i , '4�---� • i • �� ( • : � :�ti.•�\,� t , , . . 'y /:.. t i �•; �/� �ii i� .�'� }z �c \ �r �. _ t : :�� 1` %/.% '•. ".../ ., � f� . 'fF.� \ t I ``\ i �%" -».i {.��d. J •' ' , a � � .�\` \ ' i'i` 1}�,11 �"_\ '." �'• ��r �. _; is;, �� .\ �`�• , i //' �''. i � � .� . Y .;� ..� �;. 1 • � � � � � � ! ,- j/ • - +� t ::,.•, ^` ,. . �. :;..1 1. •J Ci. ' 1 �.�, : . \,\ -,., `,`t i ' ' J' � , I.' : � ', •. ^ .)'� '..,:•-=. - / � . .�; ' . A~, ,.! /Y.xd"_ � �� = ! J7: � •= 6., ..�:�'j%. _ . , . _; ` , � :, .t � � � ., t ,, � .. �, ��= �.�` t) ) � � �`:��l��C�. =�.- a � �' . � ,..— r= � � I ,,, � � `�a ��_ �' __!"�' — ` ., �,� a.; �!. .�.� `}-� >: ;; i.V i�� :� �+� , , i, � • • ,i �w ai-i - y. � � , �•.: . ,:'t`s • ' OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS .j •..,,, _ � � �� . vt � /'•, LI �.«w.rwu :,;�., -�' �,j, '': Y''� `•.. a ,' on�, .r,�,' \ � ._.- I ��'' � t • j, •�! s � . �'' � r� " !+",.i �i �.-�, �V.' �� ' �r.`\`� . ' ` ^ ~ � • � ` ' _ ��r - " .�`, }4 � . � , �, . � . ' (� CREATED BY TANOEM CORPORATION ANp 7HE LYMAN COMPANIES �'�„�b �..... ''� Yt.'�T3'f �w �� '1�nY 1 t '• _'°'` ~'', _ ' ,. �.+ii ^�' � • � r��,, : - � ' � r , �� F • 1 �/ .«Kae ,,.�� ,�.�F.s�. �~� S � '' �" ``�: �'` —" COPPERFIE�D a\ 1! LL ;`s. t��i (�1j �.1 �.� �:«i �"�t , `�5 � lo -+, . M � t _` }.. . i,(y ��i . ." _ '{1p(p�Mftl2C !UM ►�16►Mm OT 601InE GANO SURVFYIMG �RCM ApIIAL � ci � aaHa �! -r = ' , � {� - � J J�J 1 ,i -'�x'�"^ • 1':��; i, i.ti /' j� �'=' : 1 � i� ti: �cowc�uer ruwtor.a aT orvs trouraexrzox. vrsszs:ss �ueo ca�roox :•S + / �! � � 4p4 .� _ � � �p / .,," � ` �' . `V' - � 'I .1• :�� S / � �'l - •• " �N''� ' � -- n••C '✓ \\ �b ` �► � �,r :I �'� � St10M11 QI MVlG DRIV6 }Ol COK9?1lOCfIqM PGMS PRCVIDLD !T 2f1E CITY ': o-��l ��,;, i,, ~� �� i ,. 5- S.L h,�' �.`�\;,�• , �.+�. �' � l'�'+a1 T�� Q or Knmvc� naxcars. �f�/.> . 1. i. ' F iy y x' � �� rt�'�"�� i4t t �^j' ,/'� •�, f ,�; ��.� �� 'Y .i... �14 �1\ sc , � �l`� i -'; ; '" (�. • j` : ; `'�� ; �. ' �.� _ - tq •1:.� �C�, : ��1'�� `, ''� �, �;f � �'�._��`� --:.''� ,.. � / :-�—" �- ��*v�1'' t . } t +�'9Sh • ��yt :�. � `� � `� j h. .,z _'/��b t�\\�. P}ll�� - �'i� � � \ MJ wStTxcw J ,I�� ,/ .:a , � . ��.��sJ�, • \ .�• 'r�f ' � � �n1 •�;:\�� . � ;� p�10 6SfD?27:LET �2G1T*Of-�AT AILI� �s.+�. u � � Y � :� f 7 "'�` , ..a��. •`��+ \�\ -'<� � ' •� :{ �1 i 1 , j f y , r.i �. .. •\, ,;'�• ..:. � . ..... ��'_�_- ;-- _"„ -:.. , `. . ,. f= ..,`;�t, °t �. . � t �t � „�, � � �.,. x. !�� OUTL. T A POND ia. - -• • - '- '1°- � �.,.. �� ''- .., ' i \ti �.` � sf \�\ ��y� iuu n rrroc ,; ; � . C w-- � .., l ` _ / �. ,I .,d: x. ,� � r � w wa�k ' . \ � �� 1 =7_� � S : � ? �ti ✓,,f � ��~� ' � �� i2 �+L:J� �'� � ,R / �y` a» ' �d� � _ W . ,; I�� _ . :r.os .c. \ / .+ . ' , + � ��+Y "..RFgt9 \ ' AIG DI %.\TI'm LOPS � ' t L V' n.:..r • � �+TY; , -. ` 4`��= �1� � ` i ! i ' ;``�/ • � s f � .1 `t �\ � � emu � or cars Ss sars �.•' ..,..� •' _. ' � � � 1�' iI � ~P� y �.: � `:�. �i.r• r� :� :� �� ^� � f+, ^ � � •1�, �� -� AV[RI1Q i117[ AISJ1 ».ssy `, ri � .»- � • �f ' �`�,"I ... �. � , �\� { ,�„ { i � f. �.�.r, / `y.\�i `.4� ; � �� . �� , '+:. s4. n. ((� 1 cwu ass oorsm f.a� tarsi�cu � t' � i: w. 1 . • �o- ��.; � ��\ } � �. o.t �t . ,+'� : 'til '. -�E. � •�,. ... 'L �J �i _ ~, �3� 1 � : � � � � � '� Ksr sz:s t�sm s.at torstactt � %�'� ,:..'` -,.y �w` � � �'•l . � .�, • � ti, ''..� �: , +~ � ,� � , � g � � t �• �� • �`�- � �l �`' \`� ,,` '+�1 �i m t.:�G�i,.. ,,._ P'�ti �' l''`= �i`-_ _ � � . �' v �!j .` i ' � p �,. s. 'L «� Ftw �, Zta„' _._ `l. :1- `S'1�'. y '�, ,�r,/"1 i t � � �', � y ,� ` w..._�' : 7l � , : • � f,,,,„:' " ` _ � � •-•� -i� � ` ��`' � ' , 'i1 �ti,.� �,yT (" •r.+'. � j,: `a ~ � �}i S ti 1�� •. ! �� ( � � t � �� 1'� (�'.. � t4 '.., � � "s.. �� LS ../ . ,/ i `�\ �� + \� . ��; � l � ;� �p ` . �:: : _ _ ; . � � • �; , ; r��;� ... � ��i, vy � ��.. , :� � t = .�i;�a 1�, ' ' :!�.. 'r � „_ `—` !i"..`-N,\ ' • ' ` '•, rr" � �. �,�\ '� I ��;.,r . �,� ,'n�_;� �'_,.-.;.. r,, �, � �. -''f';.. � � ' �. :' ..�.�,,,, :�'`� �- �_.� � PRELiMINARY PLAT i }h �`t � � t t �' ,t A, r --. ��,,y �\ �... �:�..��;f," `'�� .4;`i .aC n,...z i / : 1 � c ...+.e s / /�� `f; ^T j i�, � � T .,i`�a". � PONti s ,: i �•. / /;, . \ i , / �. � ��. s j '�_- �., , ` , �... a �:lJ.'�`tf "' ¢. s""'- - � ' i �i r"'• i 11 ti: , • J/, / ' �p ,�;� / � APRIL 14, 1988 �: r� ��- ��t 'z +� tt}..,.� � --` _. �/ •/!' j J , •�< � � � \ 'C . �� g .I �' � ty l �"�"' �� ;' .- '_'_"'v�� "��,,`1 1 ' ',-�� }~~^, �� . ~ 1 `, ~� �� I �rt . � 7 ��' f r�� . �. -.' • ;� � R�� V /' ,� I t., r�y�,�i /i�:..� � � i� 1�� ' •Mi , `i t! 4 . �y;! � ""' � _ "'�{. ��...\ �� ' �a. ~�r` " jl{ .�`�/e�'' ' � f ~ t ~ti � �, 1` . \ ` 1 �1 i , �, � �. 1 1 .....- • r�J g ♦ i/� +4�'� •�f J�i� �...Y�.(_...� � I l•�! +� � �Y�� -� w ; .,' t� `W ' � � �� ... 1:,,.[`.. j� ` f�y'lT �y�',, . : � � -.�•. /�'�. rv � . �� 0wnar 9 Devetoper 5 ' i �y'Y� � � � � � Q �j� �� _ I � � 'ti �` , � �1 �,��° ' ' �. -. ��:= � � ,..: : . i- . � ��-,,� 1 ;� � a Tandem orporation ! �7 - . r ;,./�� 1 � :Y;� ��. •l, {� ..;s ;� "�'~±�.. �: �' ��=`` ;. _ . •�: - '' � � �, I � � � . � r t� ; Ji`��r , ,�� r % , .,; ��\ ..;:'�.� `�, � ��.. . ti .. , , , o Lyman Companies . . ' '� / �,."'�% PONO '.'f' �• �RE� ry ', � ,'�•� �•• E4teo Ptlol l� Mlnn� �5344 PLAN PROPOSAL A. Mendota Farrns Goals The proposed development plan for Mendota Farms hopes to achieve the following goals: 1. Continue the communication� with the neighborhood through the planning and developrnent process to balance the developers, city and neighborhood concerns. 2. Design the project to be compatible with the city PUD Ordinance. - 3. Achieve the objectives of the Mendota Heights R-1 Residential District. 4. Design a site plan with lots and housing types that work with the sites topographic variations. 5. Balance the preservation of the existing sites features with the sites grading plen and development requirements. 6. Provide public trail connection through the site between the Huber Drive. Friendly Hills Park trails and Delaware Avenue. 7. Design the public improvements [streets and utilities] to rneet city standards. 8. Provide compatible housing types or adequate buffers with adjacent neighbors. 9. Mendota Farms plan must be economically feasible, phased and flexible to respand to market trends. 10. Provide street and utility connections to the T. I. Dodge Nature Center and the G. Weed property. B. Mendota Farms Concept Plan The PUD concept plan proposes 1B1 single family lots, 32.5 acres of public park and street/trail system. The plan provides single family lots ranging from 15,000 to 42.700 sq. ft. in area with homes priced from the ffi120,000 to �250.000 plus range. Streets serving Mendota Farms connect with Huber Drive and Delaware Avenue. Street connections to the Weed and Dodge Nature Center properties are proposed in order for future development � of those parcels. Mendota Farms development will complement the existing neighborhood of single family homes. The future multi-family projects proposed on the King, Owens and Riley properties will blend with Mendota Farms because of the road system layout and the natural buffers. I�� ) 1. ;;r� `c, . � r ' �'• =r��_=_._. ,.i;j % . . • � .. i ; • t: ��„ ,�('.�' � r i1 �', •'. '"'�":.gfl-FV '� •. ...�. ... � � .- J,' r � 1 • � u , i>�'=--''.= '�: 1 i ' • � ,, �' . „ f ,-_.c_..-.. � . � � . . . _ .... .. �� . ;",. :�i�, _.�. ( _c.��:��: �•�.� :i. � .r+"i"" j %�'•.�,.�•_-.«......« l�. ,�.,- • � - � �4 �� _ , � • • .. .�.-- ... . . . . �,� / _ t _ . .. . . • y �t �.� , , _, � r ,},�''`�--�. k` _ '_-_.' .irt• �^: %.,H��£P.-t -' :'t �`{� � � ! �� } � ,/�`. � ` \. � j � i e ( � �~ ' �` .."i ' � +.-..� J.' '.'r-^"_..�,+r� ti. �,�,,.._..;.=\_1�•:ti �,` ��` �,a� ♦ � ` ��'...'Z ` /�� q �4u �je �•L li.�u A r+l' k K: t . ` 1 t •`.i. i! R . J.. ."'�--.��' ...t „.i �2- ` � �,�`�� j •--'-`-�--f^ �' � �,fC' \~ � `t Luli_z�_ �_J i ~�i � ; � `� � t�� rjjjr�� .j_=� �a... - , , . ��.4 — �, . �� - :;.��: - ---. ; � � .7� ....� �. �, :� � 1=��j:- �/- �-rt.y--:-�-� �;, ,, � �,, IiN �� /':��il'�i 'i �� j yM `\ C p �, 5•'�� !' Z\\ �� `� ui e �f'` •�T ""ir-..-i L .-.r-j�l f ~ j �\\�� Y '' : c ' r o t �` : ✓ �i'� �l � i �E t� _ •/ �� 1 �� s lr �� + l�. � i.i• t- -�i .� .1 ��r'�s�N'hld�_r'•%'n' '�-L. -�_�a p;r��+jrs.��; � �,�d� j �"' `� `F ��t...l..?F\tY .., � � "'� - . �L a, ��,��.� <� �4 . . Y�,•� •, v .y •. _, �.e�, � �yr � =..f � � jh ,�, � , �i;i,_...,, _s v, yl. ,�t` :a'�� e. ..-!. ,+. � t �'� j; �--T'�-°O 1`�i .� .i� � & � �•. , :� �t �� :��Yr1- �'�' , # -'x�-;1 � ...'r-1 i i 'r �\ � ' ` `\-;\ �..� j� �?, t - • �a•�� l. �;�� .�� iPl'' i �o r `� � t''�Ti 'i�)�`\.,"`' � ; < i i t, M1 '/" ' t ��jt � �1 �'� a�,;,F ,'`,, ��► � ,y � �} _ $ �' : _ �7\ ;� �. .,v�,;- �,� ��.,�, � 4. . t ��` V �u� y ��,/ � / . � _ � . �\ :.\ :r ♦„!"�7'T' s � I � �s . _ � "�i �. `(��,,'�a � } V�.\ � � J ` � � , \1 ' ''. "�� }f •- r -...``�� s _ �! /�, I' �,>> -�1�� .c, , t +`� �♦ " �tN � � �t � t . � �'"'•' \' O, 1 �i `•/D .� " � • i i � , ;i �+.� � �ii�� iu �1.1..7 � ,.i�y,•i `\K � � �tl F �� t D ' J �,-. i 4, ` '�J. +��_ �V �r + r ?; \ � !'"�r � �1.�. }. .�..ad/'?`� �,,,,' .l � / ��\y R �- ..\ f� : ' `` �_' i � . i .. \ t v �' . i • ' Y '\ ? { � -'tTi� � \: c " t - - r s '1,�\ vJ��/�. �.� r�� . �\y� :.�� • `1'�.� t'��' � ,,, .'"1 '' "' �:s-4 • ' 1; _ �.� (� � - ` �'� ! :. � 1 i a � E � i �'.�"� . /%M�: tl a; t '+ti ��v�+ �% b ♦ �i� � a . ; �'1\ • � ` > 6 P ` �„; ��t�'�, tl1 � b ' � � � + f ' �^ , �� tf� �' ,, '�\\ i. �`1 � � "o � ,��/'� ,/ \ •� ' �-'"'F' �' f*� yr��..t�'d �`��i""(�; �j,l�£% '� �qr{�'� jt%.i ��\t� !i`�� "" /i.��.',yL'�.�R F, . i 7- n ��''��1 �..�ti-ji�, 1'!C = t�" ��` rsi ,�,��' ,� ,y�si� � ��j'?� �_� ' s�, q ` �' „�. ,�`� I ��1;.r•"i1 `• ��.'/.+G! f •r ..,.� t;Y.�s��iif � . �w �Ii� �`�'�ir'k' � 'P',^ � /a ; �: F `x� ,{�>.�' �Y -� �� ` F�! i�... 'c �p • ' �'� i j``'^'�°'rj�: . ^ .f� `. . �: : . //: ba ` �''�! /'�\,,,.,�.�\ % �� , �� -^� %�:• •1� I � . b"� a �"'� "4�'�'\ �:'.'�,' 1� il{ �:1�` i'�'- y' y�i,. y� `, ��t�V °' �' +� i; �� -;�•"� � i�!�'�`' lt��l'f:, t� y-` �-\�� ry''��'' i /� / ,�r +� ; l _ai�} �i �'`�{'.�'t t � -:�n� �,`.,� ' f �g ' I J� ' -v= ' � .:i t ii �+� �l •� �O� �`� �" 1,/ i' Si,•� • �'"" '. t •t� � \A �-T � �sro ti'�}�\• li �� '/ h ' u 'b'Ti 2—T 'T�X r �� i Y X / � I � � � ;' +`• -} f ""� ! � � i. T l� r.'��1.. , '�'� � lt-� 'vt �`\ . 1 �� -Q' . • t�^," / . ./ _. .,,' �� i'�`••\' -ti�t ..�.,. r�•�XYt. r! �v�e. •�`s, j ,,,�� :�l#I�1 ' �. a." s� � � ,a y�� f� �' � ,� .• }: f.�r� � j N \ t � �%� (ia/� /~ t " '1 � �! . �_ � ' ) / � � : i�.. � ..i'� „� � / / ,r� '� � ,r'7"� , ,/ . �. � � �rL`� �,��r�i .�`t' ' _�`-- '; v ' :��,\.C.�' , f;,.y / • y�.s � X �� f e /�{� � } �r •a�/'� ��l '� ,�~ ly � �� s.�t,�.l { �� `�i` y\ w'� n� o: S:�/ .�, � r�i^„(\ �� /, � � ��- if �i �.'n-'4 i~..� 1-j y/ f�;/ W ��1u �/,� t ' _ � � r� �t� �:�,�� ,,�; �. �C � Y �' i � _ � �lr� /`^��° 4 � ��_ L�' !`-�.r_.i _ -�j � ..• . .^ ♦`,� � t, �. f�� f�� y� � �� . . � c =� . � �� i t f Z e�. �' � �- � (.. �j t ,t'f"` a v .ry f� � � r t �� ,0,`-' ��; :,• � r'` 1�'r� .r i.. ( f' � .�+. . ,..;.._. � ;*, l } G' : il' �� +: /l.` � �f � � •.fr Y �'.�a � . ,_'�-1 11C�r . � � � �i tf k• t....,�.. rst �} 1 �„�`� I� �,j��, r/ f '�� l � � ��C�' x� ..�1.�?i._ �r��. . C. e � ��'�r�w3 / . W/ � \ 'r��4 �r� • < < ,3V;� �,,; Y. ��' ( i '�' � � � 'Yi: : '>�,'�.3,,.�^';�! `: ; a ,� • . ��. ti� .� F � �, �, i.�; �. , l ;�`: 4 �, ' �' • _bt.� � a J �•t f{s �;� .�t�kP �"'k j � ; L�'►", � �-1.1. �� •�� r° .. r- t�A 1 m i �. ! `,: j � ^� h1 j x,. �; f.��( , Ii d�• �'t � i tJ i�r�^�j,� ,,,k r��,I s 1� s� z , �� L �„'L�K;;�r`� �` .�= t', , � -c ,r «, 1s �{, t5� r,*'"'Y/• � �� ._f +� %�' . t ;i. .� � � �� y , �i;, 8 � i e � �,� . i ^�{'t a {i ..#: ,O y � �! .. � `�.. �' .. �� t �j� � =-., ..r '.� ' � ,,�i'':�;; � � +� , i� �1` ' r,1✓iV..: Iu � i� / ! . '��• r � - „. , �4� 9 �' � i� _t`'�ti� -JL� � ~� t/ � � ��"'� 1+'r., ; � y �j 1.. Y — .. _.. -. -.. .. ,._. .-.� __ -, t { PREUMlNARY PLAT AUGUST 1{, 1905 �,, c� ! • / . � . � ti v �"aj� �\�s'�'•Yj': Y � � ; \3` �`� 1 ,� N.7t /�s ' .. /�t -� -�;, Y. t �l d � �,- 1�r f;�,� `'�.c � ; � . , �:. ;>>•�'n�`.Jt` . �'. •• 4,�;��C��,�*l��i�^'h,`t�t �� s�_�.y,,,-; i�.`�,'•�� i ��- .-` p S, � � ! ��. � {, `�. . � �% G; k- ( �' � t"., ' �� ;��~'' t t~� �`� gY �t' �� :� � {�"---��''" ��"Y{ .`�:^• � �� -,,. n� � .��'-�i�`'3� � � ,�,. e;,.'�-.,�-'".�:�1 - . -�: r�`1z'�{.": � � • f x�-�, = } ` � � v`�j �'L='� t',ly�/.Z`� ��'.� ��;ry .C,i �� lt ,a � `.c Z� `C�.,�r j y 1 iZ < + a y�.�� ,4 a� 7� �` �;i^• �.i. ��+�5� '^� �� , f)' , f � -� � ,� �� . y . Z � �, � z �,� .::,;,,�.. � . Lj. '• � .Lli Y , .Y" � ��, • ."'�,• 1 J 'LL..�t j �� ] r ( �� .` �'�.-.. �':• ✓•.., 1 . � .. X ! 4� K"�L N =+s. �M�� t• �" �r � :�" ij� •�.i m ,�!,' i �. � ;�'� i fit .tg i � f �K � �� ' � ' ' � ;'"•;•','��r�' � �' '�• � �, /�� •�t �'�,� •., '~__u_L�. FL�'.e..._ : ,,�ti ! • , /,, ,� :�t", ( F � �� i ,.� t �,p� � �� tl , ,� � . � r- �; •.. � � .: ;�'. . rt ! � ' 7�'� e�� r•.. ' I � � f � �-, , : {, � i � _a':a" ,:� �� .s�r„ �j� /�t �� rii `� �r_.i� + ' rR ' }�f ` 1 b__ •��. � f`.r ' � _ ^� �,L-�."� "_�J': �� t = � . � ,:i : :�''y-- --�' p �, ti� � ' - �,. � � .o:.r : :,��t .-9.^i �i�,,,. `r1` �. + t ! i�,y�'i ' •' M ��` _ � _ �.�-r 1 �r �,�. f�r: � � f },1 -� jn �y � .� __ �.•�;� ,�f�°�rt' � �p .�`��''b., �L._.,.� . -4. �'� •-- ' '.ii' ��! �� I' m i� L}-� > "�'�.t. R�,.. � • I r� �� f � u:'(,=.'�';��/ ��/�,y'�?�'� �� ... y'+�``-'� . �t t �t .�. 1., �- + ,..�-L_ .��,F�� -=+��,��; '4` ,--�:-.:-• _.-.-;�..,� , ,, � . ,� .✓ ! �'� �r� � ° a :�%�i:. � r - +�%.�/ �,.;`'' `�:s�-:!'"f',..=? \.' ; . " �, . �,: ;/ � _ � . ��► ' ��a . �3;�.1.�.>�..� �.•. �: �_ "•. �. . „ i (- , '{� � ! . .'� �%t, 1 •.:' � , ti 1 07 • �-+�<„ l y;rf �t,;�� ,i _�t- t;��1Z ��..j j.�,ti'�. •` 1 � y,' . ` �i /• rS "T"' � � ' � "�s:^.. :-�-i ;!+�'- ia,(� : �s+ I r t� � , •, .. SJ - -+-1- . 61r.._�:.,��.�.t��'��t-`:..��j +�"-�� `y •� � �" ':�� .lyS• , I•� I.. _"�" .` .. -(�I�_i CJf+�t �! � 1 `t t� . �" �f AYENUE '�i ti �S � . ,.__..___... .... :; _ --- ;' .t t c i / $� f „i-• � i � :,.. ; ,. f (�� -' , , '.� ' � .. ' ' . '' t t c � . ,[,/ / �t ..'{.... «.rw.�w r F .aT f;e' ' ` ' � ' • �.� s 4 ''� � �i ^ q � � i S � � � � F �7 '3 � � � ' /' ��,�c�� 5 ::� e�tF ' t � ��; �9 �`�_ � !' ��1 � •. ' ° ' \` � . � ��; � �� i - s �� ' k � � � w a ( � � � • .. n ♦ y � ♦ . a'c � $ � � i � �, G� ik� i:�y \ r'. . � � i < ! � � � rL�+in • ' � � F t i k R 7 � R�R ' � � 3 ' � �� ' � � •y. " ? � � � `" � i � '� � � f : �°y'�� l� �'''� s'f , i z c i � j�+t�'� '•;r �i., i,{ " j 1 ! i � ��l,jl ,��?�`�g'��. t..-xs� !� � I ;� �'• _ '�1'��_ ,:.. �-. �.;�,� _ . � p.n�t d D�*tiaFer FrtOdr�Q Ey : MENQOTA FARMS 7ondem Corporotion / Schoell 9 Modson , Inc . TCF Deveiopmtnr orporatton Enq{or<<t s��..T•f� r�ann.rs ��D 1�� fi��1 q1>� w��N M.��1 - ' . .� ... .. ...rr..e v.� f.f�l J� � Z � ' � �... �o ,m �N'! �l�e .m = � � DESCRIP774N OF SCENIC EASEMENT THE RESTRICTIONS HEREBY IMPOSED UP�N THE LAND, the acts which the Grantor covenants to refrain fram doing upan the iand, and the rights in and to the tand granted to the City of Mendota Heiqhts, Minnesota, by the Grantor Copperfield Associates are as fottows: 1. The generai purpase of this Scenic Ecrsement is to retain the Iand and water predominatley in iheir natural, scenic, open or wooded condition, or as a suitabte habitat for fish and wiid tife. 2. The land sha1l not be used for public utility purposes, other than is necessary for drninage improvement which connect to the pottd through the scenic easement. 3. Structures permanent and temporary, tratiers, fences, adveriising signs, roads, harti surface improvements are prohibited. 4. Dumping or placing of soil or ather substance or materiai as tandfili, or dumping or ptacing of irash, waste or unsightty or offensive materiat is prohibited. 5. The topagraphy of the land and water line shall be retained in its naturai condition, c�nd no qrading atternatiorts, excavatian or tapographic changes shali be made unless authorized fn writing by the City of Mendota Heights, Atinnesota. 6. Vegetatian may be pianted on the land that is indigenous to the Iand and appropriate io the naturat pond edge environment. Vegetation within the easement may be maintained to prevent disease, maintain scenic views and • maintain variety of ncztural ptant species. 7, Activities detrimeniai io drainage, ftood controi, waier conservation, erosian control ar soil conservation, or fish and wild iife habitat preservatfon are prohibited. This easement shali not be constructed as grantinc� the public any righi to enter or use the Iand for arty �urpose, nor shatt this scenic easement affect any reguiar use of the iand by the owners of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and• 7, Block 6, Copperfield Addition except uses inconsistent lv�th the resirictions 1-7 expressed in this Scertic Easement. e Case No. O �'0 -3 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNGSOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Z��" b! � Fee Paid %�fi�a�� tji�_. . 7_�' _ ��v� Applicant �"d � _ ,r0 � �,'�_�7 ` Name: �►� i�D /��'��i�l•'�"'�� ,� /6Pb �-- Last First Initial Address:7� ��. �.(��l'�7• �i'��(� T3�Qq�y,tA �.—� �7� �� 1:�� 'Number & Street + City Telephone Number: �'l'��d7� Owner Name: Address: st � ��1 er & Street . FirsC Street Location of Property in Question: _ �"�V�' �! VG �c��t 9/�s.c� �''. ity S ta Ce ��T Initial �9✓�� SCate � � Legal Description of Property: _ � ��E%�� , ,�. � �a�� 11 '� ��.� Type of Request: �/ Rezoning �� ' '� � Variance Conditional Use Permit ' �/ Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. �� Minor Conditional Use Permit �_ Subdivision Approval 3 3 S '- Plan Approval Wetlands Permit Other "� � %� / b 0�' � ! + / ' Applicable City Ordinance Number Z 11%jc� �v�b�/�+�ection — Present Zoning of Property: !�-1 ��'�1 , Present Use of Property: �%LY.L�9'r � Proposed 2oning of Proper Proposed Use of Property: 3 Number of people intended to live or work on premises: 70 � j0'� �J SL��. � I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. • �ignature of Applicant �.��7 ��'� Date 6 Received by (title) NOTE: The following plans shall be drawn and,attached to this application: Y A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the following plans: l. Site Development Plan 2. Dimension Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan Date Received Initial B. Applications involving a Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit or Subdivision , shall submit the following: 1. Sketch Plan '� � 2. Abstractors Certificate (If the subdivision in�olves cutting of existing parcel into two or more lots). C. App'lications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit the following: 1. A full & adequate description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed physical changes. 2. A topographic map of the area. Contour intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals at a horizontal scale of 1" = 1,000' or larger. 3. A detailed site plan of the proposal showing proposed drainage, grading & landsc z 4. A site design map showing the location of existing and future man-made features within the site and to a distance of five hundred (S00) feet surrounding the site. PLANNING REPORT DATE: CA5E NUMBER: APPLICANTc LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 24 March 1987 87-0� R.A.- Putnam and Associates/Tandem Corporation West of Delaware Avenue, " South of Copperfield Plats 1, 2, and 3 (see sketch) Appraval of Subdivisian and Rezoning of Land fram R-1B ia R-1. and Approval of Planned Unit Development 1. This property consists of 51.96 acres, mast af which is being purchased fram Mr. and Mrs. King who have occupied the Iand for many years. A small portion af Che site occupied by right-of-way (2.6 acres) is part of tize Iar�d being purchased from James Riley. 2. Ths propasals , coniinue the- single-family deveioprrtent successfully developed further to the north by Richard Putnam and his Tandem Corparatian. The current praposal is for 63 single-family lots varying firam 15,000 square feet io 40,000 square feeG in area. The average Iot size as calculated by Schoell and Madson Inc., Engineers and L.and Surveyoss, is Ib,817 square feei. The proposed park area is 4.03 acres. 3. Attached to this repart is a 15 page statement with graphic illustrations describing the proposal. The description is well done and complete. Therefore, we wi31 not repeat infarmation contained in the narrative. 4. We have twa areas of concern with respect to the planning proposal. One is ihe handling af the lot Numbers 7 ihraugh 12 in Block 1� which is located southwesterly of the westerly most pond on the King properiy. It appears that ihe scenic easement pravided for these lots ` will be entirely in the water area. That partion of the lot nat in the water area seems ta be inappropriately shallaw. These conditions will exist unless portians af the pond are praposed to be filled. Such fiiling is not indicated in the preliminary plai. S. Other concecns with respect ta the size of the park proposed between the lakes and just northerl}r bf Mendota Heights Roaci. We generaliy cancur with the location of the park since this has been discussed in cansiderable length as a part of the overall advanced planning for the areas to the nocth. It would appear that the park be readily expanded by the elimination of two or three lots on the westerly side of the R.A. PUTNAM & ASSC1C.iTANDEM C(?RP., CASE 8?-04 PAGE 2 park (Lots 12, 13, and l�t of Biock 1}. You will a2so note ihai a significant portion of the proposed park is law land, leaving a relatively small area for play fields, tennis caurts, piay equipment, etc. b. As noted in. the previousiy prepared report, we are preparing an overall analysis of the park dedication and of each of the plats proposed thus far. The ordinance requires ten percent of the gross land area to be dedicaCed for park purposes. .In the case af these piats, there has been a considerable a m ount. of water area involved in the platting and the dedicatian. Our purpose is simply ta Iook at the overall dec#icatians with and without water areas included in the analysis. This area of the City is now rapidly filiing wiih single-famiiy harrtes in which there will be growing children. Our concern is that there be adequate area for these people, young and old, for outdoor recreational purpases. 7. The applicant has applied for the proposed new zaning district R-1 P1�0. As you know, this district has nat been applied ta the land pending - approval of the Metropolitan Council which in turn is related to the adoption af the airport zoning districi u�der consideratian by ihe Planning Commission and Council this month. It would appear, however, � that the glat couid be processed simiiar to that which has been utilized in the areas to the north by zoning ihe Iand to R-3. and approving the Planning Unit Development and the preliminary plat. 8. Analysis of the preliminary plat from � other respects appears to be within ardinance requirements. The basic layout seems to work well and will provide excellent home sites for 63 homes. Mr. Putnam's - affic� is cooperating with us in determining the exact ratias of park land and acreage previously mentioned in the report. This information will be brought together and reviewed prior tfl the Pla�ning Commission hearing of March Z�+ih. 0 \ �? ' ,.-�--� - - - �� \ � — . � �� '�� y . . . s �'c�,� _� � � z � �� ..G.�.. ___---- __'_ _ .- • J � ,.� � ' _ ^ , �,' ' �— ,-� . _,_ � , r � � ,^�w. ./ _ — ' , I • ' � � . . � ' •� • ♦ • \ � j . � : t. 1; � � � ,/.- " � � ``1-- • �;.r� . __ tn • ' � !'�_:= -,,,, .. i • - -. . �, ` , . ! . : • 1 \ � _ ----•.• s • ; r:r " _. . . • � - , � . . • • • � `i ' i ; .� * \ � � 1 � • _r • ' �____"-- i , , , ,. � , ; ■�_ . � . • ( ' ._. � .. -0 ,:....:� o , � -r� � � Y 1 LASiYENi _�.�,�� ,.. : f� I CO .i_ , .►.�-----' � __��,,,�.r�� - � t �� TM�N dT{t ...-�r-"�- A� r�...�— � :�'i: f�. •,i.,�' M � N Y , MARS►i t ' . �� y ,i:•. -- - + r • �r:= � • . . � ; � ' � � : �` •,�� ' �+� ` � PAR� � � � � ��. . � . j �j . � s.�.' . ��: Y : .' � * W ... -� / � 7 . �{ � .r- .. � � ; : s -- � / ,,,I- � / _� �,�---�---^-".. .z . ; .� . �.. f' ' ' ` • _ `� � /�- _--"- • • • • • __ _ � •'• • , \ r� �`� �, . ' +� • =- Q,Q' � � . . • ; � � • � • Gt .�, � - � ^� f ""`�c� � G'r' • , Q / ,,,- �:. 4 -1. `s;: .3 ` � � `�. � . ' < . t .� �. � .`• � ` c .� q �z �-`-_' �"�s �. , • , ti � - r � � �-. � 4L E1+ �, • . � . • ! . . f � _ , '�* . . • ' . 'y y �'• • �! '- � ,, . � • . � r_ �, � � :�.`. .� ,� -; • • • : • ' • • _- � / �n 3 : �•. � K � K • •• � � • ��,� � ,y' ! ! �.�. � Q . . ' • `,`.'•� _ - / ...' i :'• ;� � • • • •+ � �� ` '` p••', . o , . . ,! • . s `. j . . /' � �=- . , • • • . + •' • � �,.``�� ''_ ( � � ' • ' ' • . � r'� ! � : m '' �� ''--;� . . t \ c = ( . • a� �- \ � � 4r `� \1 • _ � ---- � E�' I i � y cc • t • , i • • ' %� t 4 � �' - ' � .-rrn-.,.r. ,.,,-.;•-F,• � � isA • v __ ::.}•;:+;:• • �! .^.^.,•T,•}^•:::::::::: ;t �:;::i,:: i; 6. , . . . • ' • ►� . a ,� . ........ ..:.::L• ''::�:. ��':�';i::. � � .Y''' " . iY •'•: � .� ..\•. :•.�t::+:' �::!vr •[ .�• � ..- n;�,: .. .- t � ht �:::: � ';:;:;::�:.•::: J::?:?' ;{:::?:;:;:::::�.:{.••:• � ;::?;::�: }� �::•:•:�. {.;,;•,�. • . E 0 . .� WE L V ti • O ♦ t L 9 j . r . ♦ • � J � ♦ • � .- ' `!.-�r'Y.•�..':t:�.�:.'.'.;�'`::;�:.:.. �?.: ,... ...:.. ......... :::::.;:•::v...i:.:�'::v w::... v: • • •::::: •..:::- /.:.::.:::: ..:. ::i:=:::.`:::: •r.:�: �:�:::::•::: •:..: ...:,: t:;=:..::::::5ft;::;:; .:.: :::::.::::: w: ii>''� �`'' {{i:::} � � {i;i :ti?;:'r:ii ....., •....:.'::' . .... .•..:.:w::...:::::•..:.�::;::'i':i: 7i?t}}i}}i:{ .: •. iiii::�} ,`��'� .:.}•......;.}.::.::;,::i. ...::: ,::i::: ..;.}: J� : s''Si::.:Y•: i;r: :ti}••: � '�. ;i'':�:: i �S},:•: {{:SI}$}:{{.:: 7}::::i}}?ti}%?{:;i,:• ::�7{..v • �:;::.v 4� :}:v"�; ••: {:.v: r,• ��s",!� '� ��.F.i RTY j .. �'��,,....� �. . E � �� R QP . P , ;::,:� :;::�::: SUBJECT .� t ��;�� :�u _y..t , + f..� �_--- '� . -a - - - � . � NOAIT.E 1"= $�p� � _ ` �`�``�< --: _- f� . SV ..� '� _ M ca� s �^.. � � � t . � .`'. � : �. J�'�'' " t ~ + ' <, � /--, ri : �.:,��: . � _ �� y,,` u y"' ys • �if �\� 't __ i� i � ^ /f ' �' �� + �� ` � . �y � '\ ._ -.,; ... .: �� { �x� � { � t 'k�. �� ,`,�"'"""•i> . '�, , .. � �,�^� � " �"�` • �,/ - i.... .. ° � �' ' � � _ -� _ ._.... r .�a . .-------- �,� ;a�. . . . '" ..s::z � >.. - ' _ _�� ____ � � .wT�' �.UX' x . �� :.t.\� �,�.M � •I �" �++. _.w -'�" . , , y . . . . �;�'�.-. � " ��: • . � . . �'�' ',r.' . • . . . . � . :�w � ` �'�j � '' ..�'.•; � . . . . .. ,. . .. . . . . . . . . J f,'� `�� ,r:�'"' ''r< '/ � • j � = ' `�`��'.� i:} ,�+ . iJ - ' -,-,. ; `�\`, t�� '�, +�` t �\ � � � C �� , � -= / .� � , =� —.-- . ��! . ; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MARCH 18, 1987 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg K P.W. Direc�or Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Case #87-04, Rezoning/Subdivision, Hampshire Estates (King Property) DISCUSSION• Mr. Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation, has made application to subdivide the King property into 63 single family lots. Along with his application, he has submitted a thorough report explaining the details of his proposal. We will therefore only make comments on staff areas of concern which are as follows: 1. Because there are areas where there are variations to strict application of the City's ordinances, instead of applying for individual variances, Mr. Putnam is proposing a Planned Unit Development. a. Al1 lots meet or exceed the minimum square footage _ required, but do not meet the 100 feet of frontage at the building setback line. b. Huber Drive was originally planned to go down the center of the property line between the School District property and the King propert�. There is a Mobil gasoline line along that same alignment causing Huber Drive to be realigned mostly on the King property. Mr. Putnam agreed to allow that alignment and dedicate the additional r-o-w if he could reduce the r-o-w width on his interior streets to 50 feet. Staff agreed to present that proposal for consideration. Upon further consideration by staff, we find that 55 feet of r-o-w would work out better for public utilities. Mr. Putnam is currently looking to see how that 55 feet of width affects his proposed development. 2. Sixteen of the proposed lots abut designated wetlands and may need wetlands permit consideration at the time homes are constructed on those lots. 3. Mr. Putnam proposes to fill a portion of the westerly pond to improve the buildability of Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of Block 1. That•pond is a Federally protected wetland. Mr. Putnam is currently working with the DNR to acquire their permission to fill a portion of the pond. He will also need a City wetlands permit. The City should make the granting of any wetlands permit for filling subject to DNR approval. 4. A portion of the park dedication has also been designated to be within protected wetlands boundaries. Mr. Putnam � is currently working with the DNR for approval to fill that area also. Should he be unsuccessful, the City may �want to reconsider its park dedication area. 5. Mr. Putnam has proposed a storm water la�out that redirects the water from the City's ori�inal plans. (An appropriately sized pipe was installed in Huber Drive and the costs were not assessed. Mr. Putnam would be expected to pay his appropriate share of those costs whether he uses the capacity or not). Before final approval of the storm water plan, the City will want to have final computations presented for approval. 6. This entire project is within the Airport Noise Zone #4. Construction in this project will have to comply with the City's noise ordinance, presently being considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting. 7. Mr. Putnam has applied for an R-1 PUD zoning. The R-1 PUD zoning is a new zoning proposed by the City and has yet to be implemented. The PUD zoning was intended to be implemented for all land south of Mendota Heights Road. Mr. Putnam's proposal should be considered for a rezoning to R-1 and a conditional use permit for a planned unit development under the guidelines of the current Zoning " Ordinance. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing for a rezoning, CUP/PUD, subdivision and a wetlands. permit. Based on input from the audience and Commission, make a recommendation to the City Council, keeping in mind that approval is subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the adoption of the Model Noise Ordinance. JED/PRB:madlr - CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINN�SOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNiNG REQUEST Applicant Name : �.,� , �-CJt.r�4 h'!. '� �5�,�:�. �'� �,j�_�'t � Last �rst Address: �4�C'� �jy/Kdt �' � �1C�G c Number & Stree �T City � Telephone 23umber: `�'�%-�b'70 Owner �n� � j� � Name: �V'. � L%ll�� . �cX�..[�c..�U. 5.� �.�'�C-� K /t Last r�irst Address: "L,:.�j6o� ��Y`2.-- ��- Number & Street 5treet Lacation of Praperty in Questian: ��.cz-v� %� Uv _ .o�,�- �c� � C ity r� �l.e Case No. � �` � �"' Date of Application--� & J Fee Paid -� 3��`� �/G,�'G 3 2-� ?-d'7 _ Initial �2i r!"e St �� Z ip Initial �c- �e C� ��l Ui .s�1 zv � SCat` 2ip Lt.�� Legal Description of Property: � _ tl �,t�l/[��L ��. Type of Request: �� Rezaning j}�91� a,.�s ��•�1.Y�.- f��ic.1�• Variance Conditional iise Permit � f Conditional Use Permit far F.U.D. Minor ConditionaZ Use Permit �—�� , Subdivision Avproval 33s"� -' Plan Approval Wetlands Permit . Other ��'• EXHTBIT A � l �c� �a cc...� � � v Jc�.`�'j �`�)C� � That�part of the Southeast Quazter of Sec�ion 36, Township 2$ North, Range 23 West of the 4th Pacincipal Meridian descri.bed as follows. Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southeast Quar�er; thence Sau�h 89° 57'04" West {far purposes of this descri.ption, the east line of �aid Southeast Quarter has an assumed bearing of South 0° 22' S4" West}, along the north iine of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 264A.14 feet, to the northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence South p° 0$' 14" West, along the west line of said Sou�heast Quarter, a distance of 821.25 feet, to the north Iine af the south 1815.00 £eet of said Southeast Quarter thence North 89° 59' 33" East, alang the north line of the sauth I$15.00 feet of said South- eas� Quarter, a distance o� 1032.56 feet, to the east line of the west 1032.56 feet af said Sautheast Quarter thence Sauth 0° 48' 14" West, along the east line of the,.west 1032.56 feet of said Sou�heast Quarter, a distance of 3.01 feeG, ta the south line of the north 825.00 feet af said Southeast Quarter thence North 89° 5�' 04" East, along the sauth line of the north 825.Oq feet o� said Sou�.heast Quar�er, a distance of 160$.{}6 feet to the east li.ne af said Southeast Quarter; thence North 0° 22' S4" East along the eas� line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 825.02 teet, to the point af beginning, which lies northerl.y of a iine described as failows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0° 22' S4" West, along the east line of sa=' �ou�.heast Quarter, a d3.stance of 443.09 feet, to the point o� beginnir af the line ta be�described; thence North 89° 37' 06" West a dis�ance of 189.95 feet thence westerly, a dis�ance of 211.67 feet, along a tangential curve concave ta the south having a radius �of 572.96 feet and a central angle of 21° IO" 00"; thence South 69° i2' S4" West, tangent to said curve', a distance of 243.54 feet; thence westerly, a distance of 286.67 feet,�along a tangentia2 curve concave to the north having a radius of 572.96 £ee� and a central angle o�' 28° 40' 00"; thence North 82° 07' 06"'�West, tangent to the lasi described curve, a distance o� 332.20 £ee�.; thence westerly, a distance of 390.00 feet, alor�g a tangentiai curve cancave �o the sauth having a radius of 572.95 fee+� and a central angle of 39° OQ' Oq"; �.hence Sauth 58° 52' S�" west tangent to las� des�ribed curve, a distance of 216.93 feet; thence westerly a distance af 311.2I �eet, aiang a tangential curve cancave to the north n�ving a radius of 572.96 feet and a central angle of 31° 05' 39"; thence Sou�th 89° 59'33" West, tangen� ta the last described curve, a distance af 551.50 feet, �o �.he west line of said Sautheast Quarter and said line �erminating, in Dakota Caunty, Minnesota, accarding to the Gavernment Sur�ey thereof. Property Address. 2365 Delaware Avenue, Mendota Heights, �Minnescsta. Plat and Parcel Nos. 27-03600-010-?S and and 27-03600-010-�6. This is Abstract Praperty. � E. Lot Standa�ds n. } ��i�1 - ��}` �� The Hampshire EsCates PUD proposes the following lot standards in arder to best achieve the prajects goals: A variety in tots fram t5.Q0� t� 40,000 sq, feet will provide home sites for moderate size homes. By varying lot area, width, depth and grade i.e.... walkouC, full basement. etc.., the site can provide home sites that better fit the natura( terrain and the market place. Tandem/Centex's experience is that lot widths of 80 to 100 feet can accommodate m�st every home desigrs in Che uppe� moderate price range. The Hampshire Estates PUD lot sta�dards, which - vary from the strict provisions of the R-i District wilt create a more interesting and better residential neighborhood. Hetght 2 Sto�y Maximurn (3 an rear wa I k-out basement ] . �.at Area l5,OC10 sq. Ft. Minimurn Lot Width Lot Depth BO feet 330 Peet at front Minimum set-back, Setbacks Front Side Rear 30 ft. 10 ft. 30 ft. Nlinimum The only reduction in the normal R-1 lat standard is the lot width which we propose to vary Fr�rn BO to t7� feet rneasured at the building set back. The variety in lot width provides lots tailored to diFferent home styles and creates an interesting street view. Figure 9, is the Pretiminary Plat For Hampshire Estates. The follawing is a summary of Hampshire Estates Site Data: SITE AND LOT CIATA: s Lat Sizes 15,000 to 16.000 Square Feet 16.Q01 to t7.000 Square Feet 17,OOi to i8,000 Square Feet 18,001 to 19.000 Square Feet 19,��t to 20.000 Square Feet 20,001 to 25.000 Square Feet 25, OQ 1 to 30, O(l0 Square Feet 30.000 and Larger TOTAL 35 10 10 3 0 4 0 1 _ 63 � Lot Widths at Setback 80 to 89 Feet 90 to 99 Feet 100 to 110 Feet 11] ta 135 Fest 136 or Larger 21 I6 15 10 1 63 Average L.ot Width 105 MinimurnlMaximum Lot Ares 15.000 to 90,000 sq, ft. Average �ot Size Gross 5ite Area Pond Area Proposed Residentia l Street Area Huber, IIelaware & Mendota iits. Rd. Net Bui f dab l e Area Gross Site Oensity Net Site Density Pub I ic Park Out3ats A, B and C sq. fC. 51.96 Acres 7.42 Acres 4.29 Acres 6.4I Acres 24.32 Acres 1.36 Unit/Acre 2.76 UnitlAcre (Gross Minus Streets� 4.03 Acres 5.49 Acres ' }�� .v+x, . , � •. �' _. , �A §, � ' � ... , �. � � Y , , � � .. : • . . . � � i . , . • i� s . . , i� - - 1' t. ' t . ' _ , . . • � . ^ ' . ' - , , . :�• M . �� ? •� .j � ". •�. Y ': ` . , � �%�+.� �1 YG�C. Section i � � �A .. " •,,' AYpplicable City Ordinance Number' j%.d Re.S'g��.`�S . �'•. kA�•-•s, ' . < f : ^ ,,•S' y. r•, ' '� + ;� . • Present � Zoning �of �Property: • �-�-}�j k `�� ' T� r Present Use, of Property: dl,� �5�� V'L � �* i{. � , • .. . .� , . , ' ,,Proposed .Zonin+g of. Property: �—� �� .. .. . . � . - . � > . � •.,. _ . ;�.,: . '•' . t Proposed Use of,Property: � �o I`' M ' � � e � " �, Number of�people intended to live or work on premises: }!�-, � ' � . • , . j �-" e � - ' . '•��` I hereby`declare.that all-statements made in this request and on the additional �'�fA'��'�``'. # ` ��z � •'Y • . ,,�'� �s�-: ' material-are=true. , - , • � AY, ,,' �w. - ' 1' ' , �.1' �, .� � � •t'' � • ' . _ • �I��'�E�Y/� — � .'•�� _ • � '. . " ,�. ' ' � . � - , ' �, � Signature of Applicant . _. � � . . . ::�x ' � � ' • . . , ' -- - '�- �t ' ` - �' . , �—L-Z— D� ' ' S t�.' 3 ,' f, _ , , - . , � Date . � �.. , �R. 4�, ct •e A .t ` .�. + ,�✓ � ?� � "' - ' . ' ;. a . L' A - : , h, - . `'_ . ' , ; �' . • � � , ' " - " Received by (title) Jl t — _ e {_, ` . . � � . .,A . . .. �. .' ' " �,4['i T ' l " • �� •' NOTE:"' The'following plans shall be drawn and attached to this application: - . ' ' � ..�• . . - � � - . � . � . ♦ .a . � . ` � a . •Y � ii:L� "� � ^.F '�"�� :.A..�Applications involving a Variance~shall submit the following plans: �' ° � � � : ," . ; ., , +M �• Date Received Initial . . � , . � . 1. 'Site Developinent Plan- ' �• � , ` ' � . ,2:, Diniension. Elan� . - • ' . " � . - 3.; •,Landscape Plan � ' - � � : � � ' � .. = ,, '-. • - ' � y � '. � �;�4�: ?� Gradin Plan� ; ' ;1•,;s,��.��`:��`�,�s"i: _�t �,, . g �„ .� " . ' v',. '•. ;.�,_ ' - . �..}+-�.,��= �;�'�1'i �',.�,'y.:, - a,.� ~ }�� : �'''�-��:.� . . ' ' r - :y ' *,.. • - ` .r :" fM;. '�,. ::�y� ..i ��, .;��,,� B., . Applic`ations�,involving a Rezon�ing, �Conditional �Use Permit � or. Subdivision `'� '. � •£"`��,'.` sh'all'�submitfth'e fo.11owing: , , � . � � ' f�.'�- s . - � . . < • _ �, ; , � � `�" l. Sketch Plan � ' ' . ' ' - � . ,��`�~' . , - �. ' 2. Abstractors Certificate . ` � � � . (If•the subdivision involves cutting of existing parcel�into two or more lots). C. Applications involving`a Wetlands Permit shall submit the+following: :�; ' • . - • • . � �- ' . «+ • 1. A full &•adequate`'description of all phases of the operation &/or proposed physical changes. •- , �, . �� • � , , :s , . . , 2. A topographic, mapr of tfie area. Contour� intervals shall be drawn at two (2) foot intervals at a,horizontal scale�of 1" = 1,000' or larger.• . x. .* ., . . 3. A detailed site'plan of the proposal,showing proposed drainage, grading & landsca,, 4. A site design map showi�ng the location�of existing and'futurerman-made features within the site and to a distance oF five hundred (500)•feet-"su,rrounding the site. . . ,. , � � . r,r . , . r t v � . , � .. •. . - i ..:�i. � . '�i ' �� ' �,��,�, � am s ire� s a es P'LANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT' IDENTIFICATION A. Ownership B. Location C. Project �escription D. Development Team E. Development Approach F. Requested Public Decisions SITE AREA ANALYSIS A. Neighborhood Setting B, Access and Public Services C. Natural Features 1. Topography, Soils, Slopes 2. Drainage , 3. Veqetation , 4. Wildlife PLAN PROPOSAL � A. Goals B. Mendota Farms Concept Plan C. Conformance with 5outheast Area Study and Planned Unit Development District D. Site Improvements 1. Streets 2. Utilities 3. Grading 6 Erosion Control 4. Park and Ponds E. Lot Standards F. Timing and Phasing G. Conclusion C�� 1 � l�1 ' ' , � ' ' ' � � ' ' ' � , ' PROJECT IDENTIFICATION A. Ownership A 38.5 acre site is owned by William and Lois King, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mr. and Mrs. King have owned the property for over twenty years. A 2.6 acre portion of land owned by James Riley and under purchase agreement to Centex Homes Corporation is included in the site. The total site is 51.96 acres including outlot C Copperfield 3rd Addition. B. Location The 51.96 acre site is located south of the Copperfield Development and east of the southerly extension of Huber Drive and west of Delaware Avenue. Figure 1. locates the project in southeastern Mendota Heights. C. Project Description Hampshire Estates is a development comprised of moderate to high cost single family lots and public park. The site plan is designed to provide maximum vistas for the single family lots and retain the rolling hills overlooking the ponds. The single family lots are planned to be marketed to Centex Homes Corp. Tandem/Centex will develop the land with public streets and utilities. The land development may be phased in two segments beginning with the western 39 lots. D. Develapment Team Hampshire Estates is a project requiring the efforts of many professionals. The team includes: � 2. � Project Management/Planning/Marketing Tandem Corporation 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Tandem Corporation is a Minnesota corporation owned by Richard Putnam. Tandem has been working on projects in the metro area for the last seven years. Planning, government submission, neighborhood relations, supervision of site improvements and marketing will be the major responsibilities af Tandem. Project Financing Centex Homes Corporation will work in securing development loans, bond/surety requirements and construction contracts. Engineering/Survey ing Schoell 6. Madson. Inc. Minnetonka, MN YEMDAKOTA GOLi COURSE O (►RIVATE) i � �= e r � � i n:�:: [� ' Schoell 6 Madson. Inc. is an established firm that has worked with numerous private sector clients and public projects. Ken Adolf, P.E. is the Project Engineer with 13 years experience and is a partner in the firm. Schoell 6 Medson worked on ' the McNulty project, approved an the Kings property and Copperf ield. , � � � � ' , ' u E. F. Development Approach Tandem will prepare preliminary and final plans for Hampshire Estates. Grading of the lst phase will begin Spring. 1987 after approval of the Hampshire Estates project. Upon completion of grading. private contractors will install utilities and streets being completed in 5ummer. 1987. ��lodel homes will be constructed adjacent to Huber Drive this summer with marketing and building throughout the year. Tandem/Centex will complete site development with underground electric, gas and telephone service. soil stabilization and entrance landscaping. Requested Public Decisions To proceed with the Hampshire Estates project, the City of Mendota Heights is requested to approve the following actions: Approve the Planned Unit Development for Hampshire Estates. Rezone the 38.5 acre Hampshire Estates site from R-16 to R-1 PUD. Approve the Hampshire Estates Preliminary Plat. SITE AREA ANALYSIS A. Neighborhood Setting The site is located in the established Friendly Hills neighborhood in � southeastern Mendota Heights. The neighborhood is made up of single family homes with four non-residential institutions nearby: Mendakota Country Cluh, St. Thomas Academy, Visitation Girls School and T.I. Dodge , Nature Center. East of Delaware Avenue are large estate lots of 5unFish Lake. The CopperField residential neighborhood is located north of the site with about 180 lots. ' ' � ' Hampshire Estates is located on vacant land adjacent to the R-1 Friendly Hills neighborhood and the original homestead of the Kings'. Figure 1. illustrates the site location in the neighborhood. B. Access and Public Services The site's auto access is from Huber Drive and Delaware Avenue. Future street construction will connect Huber Drive to Mendota Heights Road, and east/west collector from Delaware Avenue to Dodd Road. Dodd Road has an interchange with I-494 about 3/4 of a mile southwest of the site. [� , Hampshire Estates is served with public sanitary sewer and water located on Huber Drive. All lots in the proposed project will connect to these city trunk systems having adequate capacity to serve the projects lots. ' Figure 3. illustrates the existing and proposed roads and utilities [maps from the Southeast Area StudyJ. � � � i � C. Natural Features The Hampshire Estates site is one of few remaining agricultural sites left in Mendota Heights. The natural condition of the site has been altered by years of agricultural use, disease and storm damage to the mature woodland of the site. Perhaps the most striking site features are the small ponds. 1. Topography. Soils � Slopes Figure 4. is a topographic map of the Hampshire Estates site. The site's highest elevation is 897 feet along the future Mendota Heights Road. The lowest elevation on the site is 850' along the western pond. Most of site is rolling in the 860' to 880' elevation. � The site is comprised of sand and gravel on the hills and areas ' of clay, silty/clayey sand in the swales and adjacent to the ponds. Limited top soil may be experienced over the majority of the site due to years of agriculture and erosion. ' 1 � � � CJ � � � ' The soils pose varied characteristics with respect to development. The soils favorable features are: deep water table, rapidly� permeable soils, good soil strength for buildings and roads, low frost action, low shrink-swell with moisture and good compaction characteristics. The unfavorable features for development on such granular soils are; that rapid percolation rates present a severe pollution hazard with individual sewage systems and the soils on steep slope present a severe erosion hazard. The sewage pollution problem is solved by installation of city sanitary sewer for development. The erosive soils on the slopes will require special construction techniques and soil erosion control measures during construction. The appropriate revegetation of slopes will be needed to stabilize the graded areas to prevent gullying or washouts. Hampshire Estates is a gently rolling site that will require careful design and construction of urban development. Soil erosion and on-site sewer pollution are the primary dangers. The positive soi) characteristics, views of the ponds and eastern wooded area are advantages to be used in design of a project. 2. Drainage The surface drainage from the site is minimal because of the sandy soils and existing grasses on the slopes. The major drainage courses are to the three ponds. Drainage from the Riley property flows through the site to the ponds. f ' FIGURE 3 ,.M�.. �� . . � �- I `� ,� 1 t. ' • ' , - o o � — � i I� ' ' � ' • - ��J�.. ..;-.. .,, � � 1 � , �!',: . • �- ' . MENDAKOTA GO�F COl1RSf O Cli NTIIY C�U� ; `� \`�-•• , • � (Mrv�TE) � I , � Mendota Heights � � � � �t , � •y �v - = i i� � � Southeast Are t d °' � ��r�� 1�"' �i? a S u y �� - - M -�c`,` �� ' .:�"' - � ■ \\ � - :• - - - ��.rl ' � � - ': i , •�• �, _ __ 'I a •;• i I '� � . . __ _ ��= I - ;; Vicinity Location . _ ,/ t y \ .i �� C ,. � = ' � - �:, - � _ _ _ � � � North _ • �' %' � � - =r�= _ > ' ; Study , r a BoundaF 4 � . — ` .. ' �• �� . _.. _ _= ::�., . ` • � --- . -a � , � � . , ; . ; , _�'� ;� �,_. �, - . - --_ � _ - ... .�:.::::�: � ` ..:;.:..:;..' .~. �: � - � ti r ��esri � 1 .'..'v;�:..: ;;;. �;:�::�; � _ ' � \ i:Y?'•......X •ii;':no. •T�:..::;::5'::i`,: ` J �, � �• •r:::�. i:�::.::....�:,. � � :r, • I • � _ _' :::�::*sk. l._::Z'�L''�' �J;:f:i�:�::-„::�i' � �-• _ � I � _ , \ ►��K � � :;X'. :t"' .r: `. � �4e- • • :}`' �'%.::`y:•;.•: .�;Ey — .� • �. ,� � ::`�:�;;:.:::;::: �::,. . .::::..;�:�;;:;��:;;`��: . . _. . � :;�:.::.::.� . . _r�oori--w+cc�,• _ Y i � ",:.k�.'•�"' r'�'•�' `•5`.';Qa':5..-;:�::}^i;:,•; `� �Y.s �` +.�.,. �:i:.:. . : ' _ _ _ _ - .� • • ::? A:yi�'�i: �' . i^. : :.�tew,.Fr� � ?7i; � \ 1f � f = l • '. �_ :. � ..: �;� �� • � , Copperf ield ��>� - � _ I i _ _ _ _ _ : ; . �_ � ,. ::F„�� «•:4: �� , � , ,+ � v': i � , � . � ' J' • I _ ?:•�::%?'� OF MENDOTA HEtCH1'S .. � :.,�..ry-i... •..;:}`-•2�: � I' R tsa I - _ - _ - • _ �'l„ � _ �`:�,;.. . _ ::•''r.i;�:::.��•`:'Y' <�`'�, � ' ► I ' - ' •T - -+• '� � _ - — � .�:r;;�•�:::��'•2:.•:::.::..,.::C �• � • i - - • � - `�:��'.•.:'l,.��'� r �� ti ��' � - - - a 4 _ `-� - h',•>:'':��::�. �:_;. � -" -- , <#:.. � �'`' . J _ _ -_ . �. � {� :i r-. .: _ :.: ..;��:'''�`'�".�::...•: � .t:}., •.•.��: _ i i �\` ', c ;�'`''r;••../':;;:;t•^:%S':�._Y.g �,: '''`•3;: �`.:� - . •::j.::• .'•: � .;: � �! c--' _ - - c -'•3. ' '- % ...:i'�:<a��'��i:i'-`Yi_`%•:,'�[::_`. '•: :� �; - - I - ' ''';y: < r4 ',.,+.^. x:.::T,'r:.; � Z: ;:'.� •; �Y � __ - _ - "_ ' . �. ,,,,�..:.: _ . e:.. t......::.�a'.�,�':..�•,.. ,S�-'.'� . � -- - _ _ e' 1 � .3�} _ ' ' •.r�3: ` '. fi a:y.a'•: /F;iS%;� �'�"�r'�';;`� ; �.,� :. f = _ -- _- - °i::�.�'•;�'. � r.'�r5;.=`�5'� � T:xi�;: : � � � •~ •Y•:::::..:. �JF ~ti��.i:�o`.^a:::. :�Y�� r 4� • . � � , � _ • V � ' }:i• i'•i:�iiya��'�Y,�.�'l:r�ii�e' � ��•�:,1 . � � � _ � _' � • 'i::'. _ __ - - -' f - --'- -- '�"�'�°":::':�::k.:�;: .,::�.�:;;��.,,� �s - - - - �:•_i.,..•!'�:.��....:.:.� ..: •' .., , � =� � '::c:`.;;�•c �- _ _ ~' � � _ ;i:';l'.':.>:�:4::w ��i:�.`�:.' _ - _ -n:;� ^' i I .W _= _ -- T / j - ,:b:+:}'Fi.e.�.. - ' � . � r _ - • •, • •'• 1 - - _ � ' i � - :::y:;:::.;i:•.. • 1 .Wl;.' � - - 1 � �°:�'.'�`.:.a�.=�':;;": .-.�}.': ' l � ' I � � � � � �� 1 � ' I� •'••• •.�:1•�;:..F::e�:�?�':F'�.�.�R� � ~��„CyM:;}:?: ..� • r _ _ `` .•:i:�.� J.�i''.�i:::.'� ' "�•;S'4 ' .� � 't _ _ _ ' • 'a�'..::::?3y, y:,.� .?:�.` - - � - - - I d� � � `;:�`,:,�,�..,_ . .� .,� • ,:,�.+..s��;�;�'t � .:.;�:; � ii- - - � � i+;'�STii�%i',i;:;::�e.:-:.•.:,r:r?•;;+s'•: I = _ _ - -- = - . -..:..:•.. 1 ......�:%7::'s;i:•.:�:..;,.: . I • la, _ - - _ -- -- - . /C�. • . "�' !`�i,:..;::::: �a•.:.:. :t::r.:�.;X:.t - _ ' .� /� i � ''�;=r;�;;::;s}�.:: .,:�:•;� .�;9k�:'�:��::: "?::�;:~;':';'.,�:,,•• � _ _ - - - _ • � :.�.;.;::;::::;:�. �� I :¢ � I+ • O ' 1 � :..i:�::�.{.. R:.�.(':..r�`•��' ?!r!�'�'• , � / 1� /� : .-`•`n"'.'.`.'. Y �':; �.•• • I - _ � ' t . ;7.•yC.�.�, y�� . ' i Y •: •• "iK'�' •.::. y�.y:: • ...+�13:.�►;. \?� �. 1 :•,`'•';i!;L::::'.,~�,F,:+;;;?:.'... �, . . �,...::7 .: �: Z�•: I 1 I _ - _ - ' • � � i� � t 1 1 i ♦ `• . •' • � y::i.•'�- �"� .�. ` 7 . � ' ... : . .. . � ;`.•it+e:/..'s': . "••. . . ..'t• - j�'� it - ��- •�^�'�� `\ 1 ... �� I � ell�� -�.L9'/ //�"1. \ _`_ � .:.:..:`...:...:.. . _ , .: . . . � r = - _ _: _ � , ,- , � , - , < < -..�, � ��- ,� � �II�,�np� ure,%_ j= -��.- .r ,:i , , i , , � , ,� ., . �-�._, n . � � � :i.�. � ( _ i c.��i l � i�� % � � . � � r' ��' j ��` Cira�a � � • .., � 1 . i�� f �� ,� . ��/ � a � �n � �..�v ••�� iT=..� � � � �- 0 � .. �Lw �_- . e � I L � �` � /�^ ` � .�� / . � � 1/ ^. 1 A�s . i��fi � � s � � � ` .�, � ��.:,....� �� 1 ! � % .� ' .� � � � �� ,' � � � �- + � ��(1,�Ge7 � �. � ' : . i i w ,� .- �.�.�� t � �� ': �° �-%: ' '� • I ` ' � ` � i ' � ... ...��ea: . fi\ .,� . Yf�- _ " - - -�= %i � � t7^ � � --��-- � : ' .. -'� ,` �`. �,-. , ,.S , �i ; � ��; r � 4i; � ; . � S , ; 8'0'��0- =, ,. ; , �r P _ , ` � � _ / ` /�-. �� ! � � 1 e \ i ) i� �]?J � - ., �♦ ` 1 � ��- ''d ' . �! + � � �/ ' . t 1 � �'' �+' J �'l°� . fr .. v� `' � � � _ � . � - i ! i: :� �. u.. 1� � � . � i ' � I ` ��` ..�.:��.. . � i � t � . /� -�)( � �/i �1 � /��- _ � � ~`� � � � i �� 1 � • � �\ ! 1 � � i '�P' f i / �� I �� ; � � .� i `�v/( i i� 1/i ♦. ' ♦ � �"`� � / '- ' � � \ / � '. ; � � .�wr � ...^��_�� - . � �.. �`..� ��..�� I ��i� � - \,.• �� I��. � �� 1 "' _ � � 1 � �''r'• , . . _ � . s. � � J _ -a � c� .1 � i i � ' � � � � � � = essi; . , i , • --- ' ' � , i � � =, �`-�, � �� ;'�'�;-� � � :. - - - , � > > � �- Pr ., [��t � ` : : = f � .� �I �I I ` � \ . � � � � �_ � �.. �� C"� � �bl � i � � �-� ` ♦ G \=r C� � � i . I i � f� ita� � I �\ 'Q,1 i� /I ` � � � � � .� 1 � !i .- j� ;. � , , , , , , , , , � r,� , h, �.,_ -. , �_ --. � ., : � ,^. ,.�_ , „ = . _ �' - � _�-- _ : � jr!\ � / r` i � �` � � v � i �l� � i1 `-� � ��I :�Fal� _ ^2�- -`i"t .` �., i� ' �` �� 1 � r ��`'S' i� � i % i • p :; I \ 1 � !� \ � � � / J y i �..^� \�/"� � ` \ S'�%.��` ��/� �� 1 i� \�l i J.. II � � � ��' � \ � I � 1��1 . i � - � � � � :..-�-�� .`� � �� i � � ; ` � � i tq ��J h�' � �!� lY=`�_ _ �y. � �� I ^�� . � � y(o �'.� � �0l� . � ' `� ` � ��! � �``\'i �i� �, I � �� `r-� � � � � i � �j � � � � � i� � `� �. � '" � n 1 � ♦ �t71 .� • � � �/ � �� j � / . I `�, � � � /, � � /' ' � •i ��--�.� � _ __ � - - � _i�LEJi1 T I""1 ��.�-�rt3L��r�i3_ _ � ` ` � � ♦ � i'' r. • . ... . �-=yY_ - _ ------ ---' - - -��--- --- _ ' ` `` f a ~ � �� . ', � � . �. .: .: . :.• �� ;�i�� 'y, �_ . . . . `: /%� 7 '�:� 1 � • . '� . . . . . . .. .. �C: . // • • �.'� • . . . . . _, . . , - . •��,... .. '�� • • .:�� . . . . � :. . . - C� 1 ' � Drainage patterns on the site are well defined with IimiCed erosion present. Drainage from development of the site will increase the runoff to the ponds. The runoff must be carefully managed so that soil erosion and overflow is minimized. Figure 4. illustrates the drainage pattern on the site. 3. Vegetation � Three vegetation groups exist on •the site: grassland on the open slopes, mixed trees around the King house and pond edges, and agricultural crops on the upland. The major tree species existing are Red. White Oak. � American Elm, Box Elder. Ash and Basswood. Since the majority of ' the site is cropland, pond or open grass slopes, a reforestation program will be important to the final neighborhood character. � ' � � , LJ ' CJ ' ' � L _J , 4. Wildlife The major wildlife habitat on the site is the ponds with the pond's edges providing transition to the farm fields. Hampshire Estates is not prime wildlife habitat away from the ponds' edges because of the limited cover, and agricultural uses. The wooded areas provide limited habitat for squirrels, rabbits, birds and other small game. The Dodge Nature Center will provide managed wildlife habitats near the Hampshire Estates site. The Hampshire Estates upland should be developed in such a manner that the "edge or transition" from "wild to urban" is complementary and compatible. PLAN PROPOSAL A. Hampshire Estates Goals The proposed development plan for Hampshire Estates hopes to achieve the following goals: 1. Continue the communication with the neighborhood through the planning and development process to balance the developers, city neighborhood concerns. 2. Design the project to be compatible with the city's new PUD ordinance. ' 3. Achieve the objectives of the Mendota Heights R-1 Residential District. 4. 5. C� 7. Design a site plan with lots and housing types that work with the site's topographic variations. Balance the preservation of the existing site's features with the site's grading plan and development requirements. Provide public trial connection through the site along Huber Drive and the new Copperfield/King park in the center of the site. Design the public improvements to meet city standards. i� V � ��// � a �� J•'� ;� / � � •- .� � ,... ► 1 �atura, �est�res S�opes r sirg'� r,,,. � pc P�� prain�9� �� ,�eg�t8tion � \ i � --�... . �= � ..._. ��,� .�—�.""� \ ! . • � C�\ -�' , � �► ,� , C/� � ..� ? � �� % �. � � � , � � � � � � �j . I i ^~1 ' � , , ! � i � ,� 1 � �� r �.� , , � , � . . , ,��`--'' 1 � / , � ,� . � � ,� �. � �. , � ,. � � .. __�� - ��.o � / /( �� \ ��- .'�� ` � r.�1 � � �� -- �� \`� "' _--' r �.' ` \�.�,`---� / ' ' /' , /�/ ^�.; ` � ! ='. � � i � i�; � .. r - ii� � I 1 : : � ' � '� � '�,-.r' �' -'' .� ' � � r /' / /�C � �•�..•_..r ,,../ : -.!' . ..._ .� � � � ; / ; , � `'�-�' <� .: , � �., �...-- i ;. i � / . , � �. ' � � � . �r � � %� � � �l�', � r � ; � �. � �� j , � � �- . `�t I �µ��. �'� � i� � \ i . � �� '�\`� � � � ,"'� `! ...�"- � /��. �� t . ��1 � f � ' � � �`�..� ; i � ) } �. --, � I s� � �, ,/�._.- // � ' � � � \" "_ ,,,,�-',� (J / .•- `� ( � ' � j � ' � . ` �- �,.../ � � J - � � ; � ` �.�. ,� ,F _� � � ��/J � �1 ! r t �1 / �f ; j%./ � ( ,�/`�t�, �..._ `'Y!; ,,, � i /� li � j . ;' �;" � � '�� ;:'''� t ' � � . � . 1 f� � 1-�` �� . � � . �.4i � / , � ,, , � f t � ( • � ,.- / .��. ;� � �� ' � � � `` .._ � �i �... f f . r. ;, -= ¢;: , � , � L�J ' , , ' 8. 9. 10. Provide compatible housing types or adequate buPfers with adjacent neighbors. , The Hampshire Estates plan must be economically feasible, phased and flexible to respond to market trends. Provide street right of way for Huber and Mendota Heights Road in conjunction with Rileys and the School District property. B. Hampshire Estates Concept Plan The PUD concept plan proposes 63 single family lots, 4.03 acres of public park and 6.41 acres of collector street right of ways. The plan provides single family lots ranging Prom 15,000 to 40,000 sq. ft. in area with homes priced from the �130,000 to �195,000 plus range. Streets serving Hampshire Estates connect with Huber Drive and Mendota Heights Road. Hampshire Estates development will complement the existing Friendly Hills and Copperfield neighborhoods of single family homes. The future multi-family projects proposed on the Centex property will blend with Hampshire Estates because of the road system layout and proposed unit designs. C. Confarmance with Southeast Area Study and Planned Unit Development District Hampshire Estates was designed with the objectives of the City of Mendota ' Heights PUD and R-1 Standards as guidelines. The natural characteristics and development constraints of the site provide an excellent opportunity to meet the PUD and R-1 district requirements. ' Planned Unit Development Hampshire Estates is proposed as an R-1 PUD development conforming , " with the new section oP the City Code. Hampshire Estates development plan meets the PUD standards in sections 19:2 [1) [a-d] of the existing code. � 19:2 [ 1] a. The proposed plan meets the Southeast Area Plan approved district for low density residential land use. 19:2 [1] b. Hampshire Estates is a unified concept for development of the 51.96 acre site. The proposed plan is for totally single Family lots due to neighborhood, market considerations, city plan densities and adjacent projects. The site plan preserves all of the ponds on the site and uses the sites topographic variations to create an interesting neighborhood that meets city engineering guidelines. Preservation of the natural shoreline on the 3 ponds is proposed in order to retain the shoreline wildlife habitat and complement the park use adjacent. ' 1 r ' , �I �I � J �J ' Ij � ' � , I� � , , � � , 19:2 [1] c. The Hampshire Estates plan has been modiPied to blend with our neighbors existing and future uses. Our plan provides utility service to the Riley property. The plan may exchange land with Copperfield to provide more logical use of sites due to natural terrain features. The existing homes of Delaware Crossing, Friendly Hills and Copperfield have been considered in the site planning process regarding lot size, orientation and street location. Future plans for Riley's property by Centex have been incorporated in the plan. 19:2 [1) d. Hampshire Estates, if approved by the city, will be a joint venture between Centex Homes C�orporation and Tandem Corporation. Centex Homes Corporation has the financial resources necessary to complete the project as proposed. The purchase agreement with the land owners. Mr, and Mrs. King may require phased purchase of the site prior to installation of public improvements. Payment of city fees and assessment will be the responsibility of Centex/Tandem Corporation. Over the past 10 years, Centex Homes Corporation has developed over 2000 units in the Metropolitan area and Tandem Corporation has developed over 400 lots in the last three years. SOUTHEAST AREA STUDY The city retained its planning consultant to prepare a study of the southeast area, of which Hampshire Estates is the eastern part. Although the study has not been finally approved by the Metro Council at this time, all of the proposed land use alternatives for the 51.96 acre site recommends low density residential at 1.6 units/net acre. Depending upon street layout, the total number of allowable units would be 65-70 units. The Southeast Area Study does an excellent job of discussing the transportation, land use, economic and open space issues for the area. The need and location of an additional neighborhood play-field is proposed on the King site. The 4.03 acre park is to serve the Copperfield/King neighborhoods. Tandem/Centex believe the existing Friendly Hills neighborhood park and the proposed neighborhood park proposed on the Centex site will provide adequate and convenient active recreation space to new residents. Hampshire Estates will include a trail/sidewalk system that will link our residents with the surrounding facilities. D. Site Improvements 1 . Streets and Trails All streets will be constructed in accord with the city's requirements for public residential streets. 50' right of way will be dedicated by the developer at the time of final platting. Mendota Heights and Huber Drive R.O.W. will also be dedicated with the final plat. Since the project may be developed in two phases, the street systems will try to pravide loop or through connections. � � �� `� 1 � �> > ;' 1 - � � � �;�; � j � I � :.:.�., � � t ��.�!�� -�__" - L. �-�....,. r� l,r`%� �_,�`,. j t �� ,� .._I�IaJYip�liix.�e � �:�: � � Esf�,fes Ej � � _ r f � � i i � • I i' ;7� _" � � f �`� 1 j��U � � � ��1� ., . ..,�:r �'/ ,�� i�� ' �_-�~ %�;;- �' ��1 1 % __ i j _ � /,. ' � .'� r� � ,�� ;1 /�`j "�% ,�i� I ` j� , / ��", , \ i � . �•�\ \ i � f �� ;� ,� ;,\\� . j. /� � r . ��`�.. �' � � i �' + 1 * � � � , > . �� , ,J;; � � � � __ � �- _ , f'� �� r� 3� � • / x � '� � ".�., . ,,:,=� �-~.__ �..��s.... , � t �s:-=�...:�: � � . K� i ,��'�_ � % ,' � fI �._.._- .� � t T � f" I r � `1 :' �_ _. � �, � � ; / . , i.. • � � .,$� �yi,' � /1 . �' �./' f �� j � 1� � / . .�---.. ��t, � � . , . � ��' �t ��,.' � \', , �,� .,�,� ; ��'. }, ` � '' •. � '� �,��:., �.�iY •~'� �. _ � '.�. � � . ._ ��.1� -/,.,i .w ti, : r •,,��;�jj,,;: - � i' •� �;. �•;-.;�..`� .�. /%�//.��. .. � �.1�..... � ~�=\\�\. . .. �}....�_.--_.,.��, .. _ FlGURE 5 � �,� � �;� � ► �� _ �- � � � ;:-�-�-�, f �� ! 4 ,,/ .._ /_ ( �`' - �.,� �. 9` ,_,, � -� -- . � � ' , The street plan is designed to result in a high percentage of the lots with views over the ponds and walkout lower levels. The street system is not intended for through traffic and stop sign intersections and curving low speed designs are intended to discourage through traffic. The city's collector/arterial street plan with Huber Drive, Delaware Avenue and Mendota Heights Road provide excellent through streets to serve the residential neighborhoods. Figure 5. illustrates the street plan and sidewalk system. , The trail plan will provide an asphalt trail along Huber and Mendota Heights Road and through the dedicated public park between the ponds. The trails are intended to provide a safe ' and direct route for bikes, runners/walkers to neighborhood recreation and the community trails. Not all streets are proposed as trail routes because of their traffic volume. , ' ' , ' , 2. Utilities All public utilities, sewer, water and storm sewer are designed and constructed to city standards. Figure 6. illustrates the proposed Preliminary Utiliti�s Plan. Some over sizing of storm sewer may be needed to serve Centex's Riley site and some drainage from Sunfish Lake through the property. To complete the drainage plans for this area, connection of all the ponds will be provided as part of Hampshire Estates storm sewer system. Regulating the high water (evel in the ponds will insure that flooding and stable water levels can be maintained. The storm water will be collected and transported with underground piping and discharged into the pond within the site. The three site ponds will be connected allowing slow drainage north into Copperfield and to Friendly Hills marsh and finally the Minnesota River. 3. Grading and Erosion Control ' The site grading plan requires about 150,000 cubic yards of excavation to develop the sites. Many alternatives were considered before selecting the current plan. The grading ' necessary for the single family lots will disturb most of the non-wooded areas on the site except for ponds and their edges and some of the existing trees. To use the site for residential , development, which "fits the neighborhood" alteration of the natural ground is necessary. The only type of residential project that would reduce grading significantly is higher density uses. ' , , ' The areas graded will be revegetated with natural grasses or sod as soon as practical following grading. Final development plans will use many temporary and permanent erosion control techniques to protect the ponds and slopes. , , ' � , , , , , � ' , ' ' , ' , , ' E. Lot Standards The Hampshire Estates PUD proposes the foilowing lot standards in order to best achieve the projects goals: A variety in lots from 15,000 to 40,000 sq. feet will provide home sites for moderate size homes. By varying lot area, width, depth and grade i.e.... walkout, full basement, etc... the site can provide home sites that better fit the natural terrain and the market place. Tandem/Centex's experience is that lot widths of 80 to 100 feet can accommodate most every home design in the upper moderate price range. The Hampshire Estates PUD lot standards, which vary from the strict provisions of the R-1 District will create a more interesting and better residential neighborhood. Height 2 Story Maximum (3 on rear walk-out basement ] . Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width Lot Depth 80 feet 130 feet at front Minimum set-back. Setbacks Front 5ide Rear 30 ft. 10 ft. 30 ft. Minimum The only reduction in the normal R-1 lot standard is the lot width which we propose to vary from 80 to 170 feet measured at the building set back. The variety in lot width provides lots tailored to different horne styles and creates an interesting street view. Figure 9, is the Preliminary Plat for Hampshire Estates. The following is a summary of Hampshire Estates Site Data: • SITE AND LOT DATA: Lot Sizes 15,000 to 16,000 Square Feet 16.001 to 17,000 Square Feet 17,001 to 18,000 Square Feet 18,001 to 19,000 Square Feet 19,001 to 20,000 Square Feet 20,001 to 25,000 Square Feet 25.001 to 30,000 Square Feet 30,000 and Larger TOTAL 35 10 10 3 0 4 0 1 63 Minimum/Maximum Lot Area 15, 000 to 40, 000 sq. ft. Average Lot Size Gross Site Area Pond Area Proposed Residentia 1 Street �rea Huber, De I aware and Mendota Heights Road Net Bui I dab l e Area Gross Site Density Net Site Density Pub I ic Park Outlots A, B and C Lot Widths at Setback 80 to 89 Feet 90 to 99 Feet 100 to 110 Feet 111 to 135 Feet 136 or Larger 21 16 15 10 C 63 sq. ft. 51.96 Acres 7.42 Acres 4.29 Acres 6.41 Acres 24.32 Acres 1.36 Unit/Acre 1.76 Unit/Acre (Gross Minus StreetsJ 4.03 Acres 5.49 Acres 1 ' F. Timing and Phasing In order for Centex/Tandem to proceed on the proposed project, � installation of public utilities will begin spring. 1987 on the lots in phase l. This schedule would allow Centex to begin models this spring with opening this summer. , Centex/Tandem expect phase I to be completed by late fall, 1987, enabling phase II to begin by late 1967 or 1988. Each phase will be constructed separately so that the remaining part of the site does not require costly , improvements or alteration. The financial strength of Centex Homes Corporation is a very important factor in the future success of Hampshire Estates. y ' G. Conclusion Hampshire Estates is proposed within one of the most beautiful residential � areas in the Twin Cities. The experience of Tandem/Centex in residential development will provide the skill, financial resources and commitment necessary to create a fine residential neighborhood. Consideration of , the projects within the area provides an exciting opportunity of high quality public facilities such as: parks, trails, drainage improvements and street systems. The Hampshire Estates single family neighborhood is an important part of the southeast area. We look forward to beginning ' the Hampshire Estates development in 1987. �_ J � ' ' ' i 1 1 1 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 27, 1987 . ,� � / ��TO: City Coun �' FROM: Paul Berg, Code Enforcement-Officer SUBJECT: Proposed Parking Lot E�ansion, 2465 Lexington Ave. DISCUSSION• Ryan Construction, owner of the Unisys facility, located at 2465 Lexington Avenue, Yias submitted a� drawing and letter of request asking for City Council approval to construct 53 additional parking spaces in the south east corner of this property. Unisys has recently modified their interior warehouse space creating additional work spaces and needs the additional parking for those new employees. Staff has reviewed the drawing and finds that it totally -complies with ordinance requirements. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that Coux�cil authorize the proposed parking lot construction. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion approving the site plan. PRB:madlr attachment � , April 22, 1987 CSTY OF MENDOfiA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive MendoCa Heights, MN 55120 Attn: Paul Bexg Re: Unisys Parking Lot Addition Dear Mr. Berg: constr�ction con�pany � OF MINNESOTA INCORPOFIATED � � This letter is in regard to �he request for City Council approval on an addition �o an existing parking 3.ot. It will be iocated in the southeastern corner of the Unisys lo�. A fifty-three stall lot will be used for additional car space needed since the additional tes� fioor and mezzanine level has been reconditioned from warehouse space in the interior af the building. Proper draznage, curbing, and striping wil1. be inci.uded in this lot. Tr7e respectfully request this be put on the agenda for the May Sth�City Counc�l meeting. Sincerely, RYAN CONSTRUCTTON COMPANY Michel Denn Project Engineer 700 IN7ERNATIONA�. CENTRE, 900 SECOND AYENUE SQUTii, MINNEAPQI.iS, MlNNESOTA 55402 TELEPNONE 612j339-9847 �� - -� . CITY 0�" MENDOTA HEIGHTS - -" - - -- - �� '� MEMO April 30, 1987 T0: Mayor, Ci,Zy Council and City A n s�fa.tor FROM: James E. Danielson Public Works I7irector - SUBJECT: Methodist Church Preliminary Plat Case Na. $7-08 DISCUSSION: The Planning Commissa.on conducted Che required hearings far the Wesley Addition at their Apri]. meeting .(see attached memos). RECOMMEENDATION: The Planning Commission vated unani,mously ta recammend approval of tfie preliminary p1at. ACTIQN REQUIRED: u If Council desires ta implement the Planning Commission recommenda- tion they shauld pass a motion agpraving the preliminary plat. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 24, 1987 TO: -Planning Commission � FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg " SUBJECT: CASE NO. 87-08, St. Paul's United Methodist Church, Subdivision � DISCUSSION• Bill Gydesen has submitted the attached preliminary plat for the proposed Wesley Addition for staff review. The west half of the street for the subdivision was constructed last year in conjunction with the new Methodist Church. The remaining street and utilities will be installed this summer, along with the Warrior Pond and Rolling Woods Subdivisions. The five new lots meet or exceed all of the ordinance requirements. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing and based on input from that hearing, make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/PRB:madlr , f � � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: PLAN(VING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. 2. � 28 April 1987 87-OS St. Paul's United Methodist Church To the East of the Church on the South Side of the Extension of Wesley Drive Subdivision Approval This is a very straight forward request for Subdivision Approval that has been under consideration for a long time. The property includes a total of 6.83 acres of land that is proposed for five lots averaging 19,740 square feet. " , • The property is zoned R-1 and the lots conform to the subdivision regulations. There are no significant natural constraints to the development of this land. " �:.._�f " - • - - . - - `. . Case No. %' 7~�'U t1 _ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY,'MINNESOTA ... _ ,w... .� , .. _.. _`x,;; _ ;, .�'�'-;�,'<:. . . - ;APPLICATION F4R GQNSiDERATIQN •�. ••- •A: T" •••� • � �J:- . _ �` '� .,�t �=��- . - - �� ' " •--t>�`?':��::N-:-:;,.�,�:Y-..:�.``�:�...:;,.,;.tr.;�.....r�,,;::<-t.:�„=:.._.aF ... _ .:x .,.. - � - . . .. ,-�� „ -, � ... � PLANNING REQUEST . � • , . r � . � ' .. � � •.� � : •; ,., :,�• ._.�, �_. . ', sr• ' , Date of Ap�1 ication � __: . -�',».- . -� � . . �-,�:...::�.tt,.� _ ,.�,�....��:.�.. . , �: „_:� , Fee Paia l�St�r��35`'�a b 9'� � Applicant � �+�-�-� _�`l � x„1:%�, :� -- .t� • ."� � �,. � �� - • . . '' - _ . Name: � J / • 'J �l�L-- �.S �"'_t/%�%��.i��,'�/�`��;�17,��,�% �iZ7Gl��-'� .... . • . Last �.��.=� rF:�..- . ��"s� :.n First -� _ :°�' ...- � Initial �- ._ . . . .�. :.�. . . Address: ��QL� �.2l��.�L�� G+�/V� �'//�l��C��y ��'aTs• %�� Sif�O Number & Street � - �� :� r � City_ , _ - . . � , . State • Zip . : � asY.;'-'e: . ..i ' :.�= ' �'>y .s^. .ro�,..s• _ Telephone Number: ±y��o�''��50� J � "" � . , ' . _ ; F _,.: _.,� . �:.,.i >>; '. . ... ,:`" .i - _ , . �Name: 5�;�, ; `/� � � ,:.;�/'j� V� . �,,.� ., �.µ Last - 4 ...� ,,,y „ r �� z . First , _ Initial Address: , 1 . .M F-'=t''`,`. -• � ' - ' .` . - �: � ' ,Number & Street � Ca.ty , State Zip S�reet Location of Property i.n Question: , � � , �_ _ . .. _ ' w . � • . , , . ,.. , '"r. -T .� S°' �, =s.s� . • . _ . � .,, • .. . _ ., . • - . .. . . , . �. . . o:.. �,..s �. . ..e : �e. , � . .. _.. . • � . . � - .. - . _........_� . ..: ,: . ' ,. �- . . ' . �� tS7�� . �/ � X fi',��d �'v d � ��'S 1..� y L�1N.,� , . _ : - , -. . o Legal Description af Praperty: .:� : . .. ,. �' : - . " .. , � = - � '- " -. � . .• '�"�'«. - •- - - � .. -- . . . . .. . , .. .. - . e . m : . ._ .�.. .. _ - . . . _ • i �rct1"' 1°�2?" �'�' �h�'.e' ltld'r�?'h( � S 7. �f `��: �.'a F T��" � S� csr-t1 ' ��o• � '�"�: `'r� F ?N� � t - . . .�_/ , . - ,. - -.. , .�_, ._ ,_. , �. . . .� . , . . .. .: .� ---_., ... .,. �,� %� Q �' 71y� l,✓1it/ �� - L Y�N�• �X1 � �"�'h' � �! d � T.X}Dl? �ci• � � X G1' �T �i��A,.f � .r ,. • , .... _ - . � - _ . . . _ . j �'� �T. . %r�%"�R�O � ` I N S FLT/ d )v c�-.� �o !�/d � S �iill� a � 12 �v - _. 3 � � . �L. � � • J4 � � � � ,�_ _ � G+OJ�%`T/Ol/VI/YG� ~- �, �.� p�R�'s,��n.� � r� C. ss~ - ,: _ .: ...:�:�: ;-: �: �� :.'px�w =. -: xr:._�� . -.r.:... �w.: . _�.. - Type of Request . - � - � T Rezoning . . •s. - , . , . . � . _ - . - �. , .: :....� � .�- ::_�,_ � _•.. ... _ .. _ . Variance ��; '�� -:, :� =' -,.� . " .. � .... ._. ._ . . irt. ia�l..wa� ......� . ... , r'-S.. v . �. .. -.. ... � r�w. '�:i�>...+_�� ..«. ��h.iM..++..e . ...._.....m w. . � .,j .i`. .� . , .. F - ,� _ . _ ~. . -� Conditional Use'Permit ., �. =�, ; - , . . � .. - �,;.,:, : � "` � � � • � • • Conditional Use Permit�for_P.U.D. �, ' ' ' �_ � , � „ , .'.. .� � - - • Minor Conditianal Use Permit .;- .- .. . � , - .-r; . ', ' -- �•• �_�� Subdivision Approval � ., ��, - , ,. ' � •:Lt 1c. _'#.vTt ''`>�� .�-y. , . .. - . ... ..v ' " , ' . �" � Plan �Approval . . . _' .. . . . . . _r. ` .. • • • � . ' • , . Wetlands Permit �:,'r.�:;,.. , • . ' x�� -2 - :.a , ', � ; ;•-, - . '�,, s .. .....,,. " � ' - • " ' --� , - , ;�:'. ,�� . . �' Y� . ..4 _...Other ` � . --,�. , . . . � � - . - _ •_ -�. . ' �:_ _ � �=� _ � - , . ;, :.. ,. . �� _ : , - _: - _. . r^x �. � �-;„ ._ ,.. ' �. .�-, • . - -- . . Y... ; E"r_ .. ��:-_. . . , ._ . . . n: - �'. '' ..�-;"t"i ' �;i�; _ ,. r ��.�.,;,�..., ... . � -� - �-- , � �r��::'� . - -. ,'v$.': _ 1.. ...1{: . - , . .. - �_ ' - ', ' _ . •- ' c- , .�;.Y��vi.. . . , , • _ .. . . . : <` . • ' .,, .. . •^= � ' . . . , :� _ ., .. `'�. . • ,y" ,Y.{L�,: � . .. . '�., � �--.r':;'p�i� . . ..« - . , , ., ,. _ ". '....' .. _'�"y�•' ,•`�;,i� _ ,'. � ��_ _... "' `� `t :�'��::tfirF.','s��.;`t.':`�.w�`,�� y'',' ��%�i:'�=. ..z`, .�o _ - , '. �_ ' =,7". : . a .'.'�n"Y;.iy ... . . � . . - ' " " ' � , .. ,- .- � C. , +.'S. .»�v. .. ,. � . • .. �. , � :.. _�+��-`Sn � ' ._� . ..-. � . • r rz"�'a .__ • [.�-•.}M,rN Yi __ vx _ y �-. : .. a � _ ` _ _ . . . . ' • "_' � .. .. _.� � . = . .,- " - .. . ,-Y _ _,F,.. . ' ' ` . .r i -.�. . . . " " i. ' • .. "' + ' ... ._ i: n ' : . . -:-- . ". ._.>.. "�. � _u _ _' «. _ , _ ;x, ;. . � .'_� : . . ._ . - ,;s".�:='.:::... _._ . ... . - ' Y. - , . — - . . 3,�. - ..._ _ +. - , _ � . - - • -- " ..- •� .._- . . _- - ._. .. .Y':±^Y,_ .�• ... ' µ .. . . - " ^" "' " .. r '"' .. . .. : .. . . ... i� _ ' -__:. - .� _ , .._ .:., . . a.,..«r..... -_ . . ..,.._-. """' " Applicable City Ordinance Number ��%f Section • PresenC Zoning of ProperCy:�'"' ( � � � � ' PresenC Use of Praperty: �/�iG�lN� G-�lr✓.� -.-�Propased Zoning of Property: �"' j . . , .� , >. .� - ,� � Proposed ~Use af Property: �1N 1G� '1 U .S� � _��`.,' ' :-- ' ' : : �,. , . ` . � ,�� _. - . . y _ �T--_—�, `�- NumberYof� Ypeople intended to live or work ,on premi,ses: ��(�� I hereby declare that aII staCements made in this requesC and on the additional . -� . _ ��t��i�� a�� ru�. • ' �, `:J ' i, _ ; =. ' 5�'"(�,' l s lJryr�,� yi'17�vpi.�r ��i! � Signature of pp ic � • • G�i�►!n r,� ph.� . ' �rl�llvlS?'�Q'liy� $or0'r�b -. . . Da e g�� ' Received by (title) .� ,.w_ -� ; . � , _ . �, , � . , `- - `E ... . . � ' .. •,,�� . . _ ..� NOTE: The�following glans shall be drawn and attacirec3 ta this application: A.:rApplicatians invalving a Variance shall submit `the�fallowing'plans�:�''�';.� ��"_�`e. , ._. w . �. ._ _ . .. . . � � .,,w . .. , _._ .,__� . -. - ,. . . ~ Da�e Received -, -_ .` - Initial `:, � " • 1. Site Development Plan , . �. ��. �G - - • .- .. =`. ' , < 2. Dimension Plan � .. .. _:.. _` � .' , .- -, �''='�"� . . <- �- . .._ . ._. .. , ._ 3. Landscape Plan . � . . . . . : ' _. . _. � ,....,�4._ _ Grading Plan . . : �..::x.... ._;`, _-k: .._.. _ . _. . ._ .. w._.....__.�:....�.,,...s. �__ . B. l. 2. Applications invalving a Rezaning, Conditianal Use FerFnit ar Subdivi.sion shall submit the following: � • .._. _ � .. 4 • ~ � ,.. .. ,,: ._,. , _ .__.... , . -_ , • .r � Sketch Plan - ' Abstractors Certif�.cate � � . �- � � - • (If the subdivision involves cut�ing af existing parcel into two or mor� lots). .. • �:� . - . .. .. _..�, . • Applications involving a Wetlands Permit shall submit the follawing: �` .- A full & adequate descriptian of all phases af _the operatian &Jor proposed physical changes. ,.. . . . . ..v. ..,,�.. ' _. .-- .. . _ . . _� '._ .._ - . A topographic map of the area. Cantour in�ervals shall be drawn at two (2) �-� foot intervals at a horizontaZ scale of 1" = I,Q00' or larger. � ,3.= A detailed si.te plan�of the propasal showing proposed drainage, gradirtg & Iandscapir 4. A site design map showing the location o£ existing and future man-made features __wi.thin the site and to a distance of f ive hundred (S00) feet surrounding the site. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _ _ __ ._ _ _ . _ ___ . .__ __. _ MEMO ! April 30, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City '��i s rator FROM: James E. Danielson ' Public Works Director SUBJECT: Losleban Wetlands Permit Case No. 87-10 DISCUSSION: THe Planning Commission considered a sbetlands permit request from Mr. and Mrs. James Loselban at their April meeting.(see staff inemos) RECOMMENDATION: At that meeting the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requested permit. ACTION REQUIRED: 'If the City Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission rec- commendation they should pass a motion waiving the requirement for a public hearing and approve a wetlands permzt for 815 Hazel Court allowing a swimming pool to be constructed within 6 f eet of a wetlands boundary. � ,• . CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO APRIL 23, 19$7 TO. Planning Cammi�sian FROM: Jim Danielson and Paul Berg , SUBJECT: CASE NO. 87-10, Losleben, Wetlands Permit DISCUSSION• � Mr. Jirn Lo�leben, 815 Hazel Court, is proposing to have a 28 foat raund swimming pool instalied in the southwest corner of his propert�. He has submitted a Ietter of rec�uest, site plan, signatures of approval from adjacent nezghbors, plat area drawing and typiaal photas o� above ground pool and deck installations (see attached). Upon review of site p1an, it appears that the pool, deck/enclosure �ence will be within six feet af the pond and the paol is approximately 15 feet from the pond. The wetlands that zs adaacent to Mr. Losleben"s property is located on the Schao7 prapert� which �s presently undeveloped 1and. Because it is undeveloped land, the pond does not have an autlet control. If we should have an extremely wet year, the pond would overflow to the east and not narth toward the proposed pool. � ACTION REQUIRED Review with the applicant the wetlands per�nit request and make a recommendation to the City Council on the wetland permit to construct within six feet of the pond. JED/PRB:madlr attachments , a PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION RE�UESTED: �- PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: � 28 April 1987 87-10 - James P. Losleben 815 Hazel Court � Wetlands Permit 1. The applicant requests a Wetlands Permit to allow the construction of an above ground swimming pool within 100 feet of a wetland. 2. The reason given for the request is the fact that there are large trees located on the rest of the lot that would need to be cleared to locate the pool elsewhere. � 3. Attached for your review is a copy of a petition in support of the variance that has been signed by seven of the property owners on Hazel Court. 4. This pond is not a significant wetland. Though the variance is extreme (from 100 feet to 6 feet), it appears the shape and elevation of the lot and site condition mal�e this a r'easonble request. � � � � � ""' N � v \ ' , ` V 7 � r! ( J ` � + 2 27 3 �+ ..'�' O � * !7 G h� s (� � i7o _. 24es 6e .. . 3 � � OP/VE � rii ✓� ST 9 ' v zvs/ ' AOE.rY! Y G%� � . �/O N" v 4 0 _A . � • � - (J� � . . . . . � C� Z,�.s- � � � O� 26 r` Q�� C 0� S �4 .� _ 11� � 9 ��-�2° Y�� N 0�J by� ! _ SUBJECT PROPERTY �,4ti1� � , Zad . �� NO�RTH � � , o � � , `` SCALE 1"= 200' _ � � ...._ _ ��" �. �Nev�tsi7" v z'w � iso.�� w � STqE�.T � • � t ' O �� J? i�la, ao.i iv8t•ra�l t.' L..� ' � ,,� � y� 5 ,�, W � QILi-77 • . ` lac_, L� s;Q '�Q o° Q� ' �/dr-��cc� 6 E//cr.� Gc�rr` ; az (� ,, s.,+ :.` e= Rxs� •��a, � � 4t.�oi9,c. �?s32 � oc ' � ; ,� ,,8 S 8 � ti• s a . , � �e°�'' a ?;,�#::� � 1 � . a M � (o � ' `° "s . . B L ::;�:.,r�.::'" I o ,. Q � � � >::?:y!: •: = o- . ti � SIME ..�, ::::..:.::::::+: ..::��(�,:��^ NGE y . �y" N �07. G 3 .:�:��:�ri4:�;:;��1?!�=:, :, ;10.0 � ' � , Q *7t.23.•. N84' ;4' 3S"�✓ . i ,� � � , I a " . . ¢ n 0 ��y O� . �� SCMa4L DISfi Na. 197 � t � ` �� - It �3 Ac. �° � �..6 ! I 6 . 1 � r`` � .., H � J: 7 R7 OF N PART OF a p ��Q� � . OIQ-79 ?0 ?S � G20-7$ • Q.y' a� : ora � � : "}Q r � m o j � �h_-- tr' c .v n^i ' ` �� uN ' pJ� / opi n N O• i� V i O V o�� h^. ° I �'' �.r � 1 °f 4 d � p ,q w / 'G �' � � ' � Q � "`i �+ , 4 d / 44 �1 O PrtV, i�. ry • O y L. s . h � . ' � �'n�i� `'' »y� 1 . OQ �61� �q6�S1 �� , o v ; �t� � ? 'g �` y� �,p • ,;�7 ti+2 ar , ,�,w; rn,ya_ ,.fis .91 1� f ti Q 6Sa�Q�'ti. �2 p:�. ,S9j7',� c; ,�� N�y ptihb!�' •, p'L � �si°� � �R'-�3`3�:'pt6o4`J'�q �''`'�v � rOtQ23a.s •• _ � �J�dQpl2 �.AZ r' r64.86 �• ` n�i 6 �'PZ:1Cf° � 20�� \9 6�15°26'33 '�� 3 � ..GG�� tl9 Pt _ 2 h7'pl'xy _�r �� r` - T3T.8� O� 2 �69° N nZ-2F9°'L�i2�' v' � � Q 306.20 '� _ � :� c Thorrl�tS�`'��, a�Q o3a_gi .., g ns� --- ' Tu�,E �9�"Q0�1`�h ,�0 2cir�-B a^ �O t►dOv"^t ( ',�1;' uc o�p- $o ��1!/c P �, �01�� n•C`�'l' �o m ^� �---- -. ... .. � •, ' S �l� - ,� ti �„ 1 I I t 364 B4 nX=89�2426 ,,•o AZ�179°23�24"� .. d �.. . m � � April 5, �987� _ To: City Council and Planning Cammission of Mendota Heights From: J's.m Losleben 8'15 xazel Caurt - _ Mendo�a Heights, MN : Reference: Installation af 28' diameter sws.mming paol. p (on -ground) Recently our fam2ly decided to znvest �a. a 28' above graund swimming paol. One n.ever realizes what other problems are open.ed with �uch a decision; i.e. lacation af the 28' pool. Our building lot is very� nice in. sa.ze, but most di.fficult far locating the pool. A considerable amouut of our lot area is either cavered with la.rge oak trees, natural crabapple, or under water. Therefare, the anly �uitable locatiaia.far this paal will requi.re a wet lands variauce permit. Even then, it will require movin.g one large_ �ilver maple tree. Please review the attached plans and I think the proposed lacation of the swimming pool is best due to the various physical restraints of my lot. I request yaur approval of this sw3.mmin.g pool lacation and the apprapriate wet lands variance. Best re�gards, , , �%Z�CG�,.— T,osleben April 5, �987 I have reviewed the attached pool in.stallation plans of R the La�lebens' at 8�5 Hazel Court and app�ove of those plan�. I su�port a wet lar�.d� varia�ce for their poal installatiou. NAME ADDRESS 1 ' ' `L�'Y ', �K '• n ��-.�/%y Cai 2. r" 3 •_.,._. 4. 5- _ 5. �- _� . • �7: � C7� 0 t 1 -=-'! 'ti � �1 �� r . �l • � ' • � _ _�,�_��'�c-i� i+. �„r. , . •' ��.ar_vc. � S: �� :'y' • -��+i. , �� — . t � . . . . . - . �. •••• i ��: . .. . � . , . • • • i �i i .i i r� i : i�i i�i i j�j= �j � �� : "' . � �. .."".,. :� •' _ t�Lj• .•. �i �i. • : i i � . . . .."""' � -�� . �..�� , ,•�� ., � .: ii��-�.'.�l ��,i '1 . � '.. � . � i � : i� •J,,. � • �ii �`�': • - �►. •.: � , • � . • _ ��:�• .-.- -•-� -•' :�: : : �; �:• ; ' :;::'; :'' ''. � �'.�5:.':� :� : : ; :•: :,: r: . . ;• . Q-,' : .; , :� I; ;;+: :� �., , _ J. �� .�:-- �I , 1 .�_r•.. ,, � _ - - — --� _V� � � + � _ ;,:.� Y_. :.- �,•- --� .�. •_ - ' fy � i; :�_.� -. = � �,.. _ _�:"'� _ _ ., �_.� - -'r-a -:r c� - �--'"_r ::z«..a..'� �..;' '' :=-��'�= .� : =• - . _..;�}_ ;� � +`'��, , - z•: �- � � � r.�:+,�` 7 , •• ., - ..k�.'✓ � , �ia.'c' : .` �f�, ` �� > ti �+`��' i',. . . .+_ _ ,�'_� ,i a w ✓ � so'• A . . a . •' . .. � ; .. � . a . � "'� � � � �,t•.=` � • .� + _ r'� _ � . a ✓ � � � , �^� - �.: s• • ' .�,,�, , ••';. �� .. . _ �c-= , ,� . . � _ . v.'�_= _Y• _ . ''•- - . ._ , �. `�tr�• . e �Y�,' "r,t t �_ _ _, _ :'t�;f,; , . ' -• .. 'i•v~;.� + : �� ,. , , _ -.. � . _ �� .K _ i: ,�� _�y�t. �. .•w..'7r _. ' . . ' • ��• l�~ � js -- l.Y r .'� . � J��.� ! • , :°'`�� , _� , t � ' Y: • � i . , �j��,r,.�, :.e.� ' . , � j.•-� t + 1� !� � ' .� i 7. ■■ .... ' � � I � i � ��4� �`- ^` .Ii = �� ':�� ' � , �,�_ .� � r , -�� --��I�� , Ia �a��..r... : :=�^ �, _ _ . ,: ,.::k.. = :�•• ,, -�.sti;✓ �' � _ _;��=�. y.; , ,� �, , _ I I 9 �`. `= � . � ^ '• � . ,� ,, � Il ......:�.�— ; : _� ��f:•":'�f..,;,'1 : �i.;•i.I .: ,6 . �y'!•- �..�_� '.ir�TG.�.��[_..��. �. _,. .. �r��'..�"� `1.� , �-�. •..�a,,,�e� r--�.�.-._ - --�.,�'a°�.� r .,. .:'��.,t•: „ r ` -..�rr : _ . 'N �i :s+ ..�wC _ t • . �` ;, : ' -. ' i f t � i � Yt-. ` y��..yr,�...F.'-� r . �3,.��j.��wnwt S ' � " . � �. + .'1. �•� �•-� t � `-C �..1 1M,... � ' . r _ , ~ > ♦ ,..� � � � �r4 r L«�. �� ,Ii�+a � �`{.' •' �. _ � �,K.r. �i � i _ � . n• •< ,. , ... . � � _ . . � " � _. _ , g . , c ;� . , ,,_. :� s , r^ ,',., _ �*, , 12,. .,. : .��.. . i v � '� :., , • ` . • ��•; ,.. .. y 1 ' �(�T, �. � � � - " ' . , r.+ •' .. 4'�'i' .. ��•� � _ �� . .. . .: . i _ "�5/. a '� ' . � � ' ^ ' _ .t.: .., t � -�i: � .. � . _ .. , . . .'-a�' .. ' , "'' . �4"'� �%;, u _ _-.. _. �• ' : � �• � ' "," • Case No. � �7'',lj% . ,. .�:. ,r ' . .. . . , _ , . . ' � - , � ' CITSC OF MENDOTA HEIGTiTS ' '� ' _ . ' - - DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESO'TA � . ' - ..� _.� ?. �=_ � � � `_ : P.: . .,».....w. �.. _ ._ .. ,..... , ._..._.. . ..� a ' x�.' � .. " r � - APPLICATZON EOR CONSIDERATZON .;.�`;�;=�.a �„ ;T�_ - =:r,�..�;,�j;�,,;;.�;i��4,:s'w;,;=' - •'Y;;;: i" �'' � � - � _�,�: s:-;`:3�� r - .�.. ' '"„ ::ti.�. .;.::. _ ,,,,;:n�tt�.>•;.x:7,py�> .«s,?.�r,.:.. . _ �+e�Cy�j.Y.w„�•�;•py��r.�}�r:,yt=^P+KtM,�,s';� ^-ItrR;er::ir-,-f•=*,wtat y*c-�v+:�Nw.a�»_+1:k :ss,"':F'-;.;fx . r x `,�"', ":7:i . - : .;ft';��"� -r: . - ��i ��-�.:.t. ., , -.1; _ -_ . "i ,�.;K ,;�:,z..�t . . � "-. a` .t� �F' i�.,;:'4: s"-.e,:-:at�:.'fi},t:,= - - +. a: �-�z�,s?7�::: =iE' :tsr . vy:.:j��:?= .��; :`,�.d.. ..• .+;,;.�. k..y-�� - .._ "'�_ �{.. :4;,,. . _ .. _ . ..y,r '-s'��=`'r. _<..�'. .2'� *r`� '�i'^ - ., t ...� .� ` �. { Y . . ... . G.."' .w '�.'� • 4 . ... - . ' ' . : . , ' "' • . , �'S ,,." �7.i�NNXi� ,i"'i �QII%'.'.�i `iy ..`y" �r ' `�„��J':"�>� ,: �? fi-4:=.:. ~ *3.�la�^:+,5 �: ""� _ _ , �� ....�:; " , , .,.,._. , . , . . ,..�.. ..... ,.,�. - _, .,..._.�.. ... . . ..., ...��_ ,...,....w.._ ..m „ ... , . , — --�-- — . • _ _ - - - —. . - . - - • . _<c. � ' � ` _ 3r_� � � . '.�- :-..,,....�. _. _,....,.,_ _a;<�.�.... ,.,,...,�.;...',..._...q�n.,.,-....Y... � "''�.�..��,:....�.,� Date oi A�plication � � , _�. ;=:�. .� , - - . _. � � _-� - Fee Faid7/3I.S0 � /9oS7' .. . App lica�tt . . . _ - , . - . . _n -- ., . . - �`: �7.'xt: =��` �.: ��; °�r►) �:;; � �;�`-:i�a: ;:. °.:s::; . �`fi� :..��:�i�.� ��..:�. `:I r� .. , � -� _ �-.. i'laiii�w ..,.w. / .r1..7�G�.7�+17 ~ ' ��r1C�J -r �-�+a•-:..�:c^'a�...y,w4•. :s.�r� , i , _ �,r�.> .rc.:-}-- _^'. 't._- > . (I�/ e't+� �c:. •.�e :'�t � - ,�;y}�: �._ _Last :f 1 . ��• -,First A �:: x?�,.:�� .v�Iaitial:>�.: �.+��; c::s.;;- ..�:}_�--�;�;�� ,; .�:�..�r.�.. � ,":� '-yn.�..�.,.-:.+x: r�e-�- :w.�..s. `.�>.,;�..._...�N^Y .. - � -.� '=Y;G�-` - �,. .,r_ �.+";••�.'t .. �.Fz�1.,.:. +"�`�' .�;^;.'.•"-r'�=+ '"•,k�R�. ' ��' ��^ t-ti.l-s.�r.b... �:.� .. _ .- e . . ... . ... i ' � � -` . " . !�� . ''�- :;. y .! ll% SSl ZL:� � * � Y LAddress: 8/.s � T�`+'Z�L.. �pv�G-/ /�%F-r'V�Li07�` � � � - _ _. _ . Number & Street City _ ^- _ w _ _ . State .�••- -Zip . � � . .. , �y -; � : �'�:...M> .r�;:.;; ; � � r _ . . . �. � � +�5� 31 �" - - ' � w.:° ' �;�.:w w r,,_.�,•f:,: ; ..,, ,.. ; . - o , ,�.. <<v= � � - ��,; . � �.- -z:.,: � ; ° .. . Telephone Number: � - ° • � , . . ' , �" �' ` ~' ; . - - i r,"'.; . ly�';.'.i`-k`;i�-":�':��r` .�.Fs��i.�t_..».:�: Owner ` � � ';,i � `s�r , . . � � -�� f . , j. . - ' _. , ' ":�..:� -:µ-i 'e} �'", Name : __ .L.. O � � $ h� /�J ,. . _.... ��F��'YYl �5 � ! . . . . Last First . Initial � ..-� , . . Addra s s : � ! S """ '� Z�E L.y � +Cp' -t� �.'! � � t..1 t�. l��` k�'� ` � � = �S! 2 � `- ; � .. , . r , _ �_ `;.5y:: Nunber & Streat _ _, - City • .� - . State .. Z3p . , . ' . _ . . � , `: .... ..t -K . _ . ' . , . ' . . - , �'�' � ' � - ' - � � ; , _ .ru y: .,. F. ., '��F'��_ . , , ,Street,�Lacation of Praper y Q - . . _ . ": , _ • -, _ _� ,..._. t in uestioii: �'� �u.• _,:, . . - .._ .. .. :.x>: - ., t_�' ` -, ;� •i.`: _ _�x;;�w '-' ' -= •.: r.'.Y.. �I ,. . �"'�.. :G�:,: �..�'..�:; .. s�; t �f,..t.:�: ••�.cN "''F.`.;'i_-.:�i•'i`'1� :��cx �' �Y,.:.r'9:'�= . +� �} /� �. f�,/�"� / "��...:.,Yuv�sSziit.: t. ` ..., . r�- �, +�. 1: .,.' � .��.�.' �.� .H i'.,y i '�» ~ � 48�1 � j�4 . . �.�-�.: �� : � �� r �- ,:. , �NC't�».L,.� V _."^iY G...1+ ?�G/ i% � 1 �=i� ' . . r;'_ F: x�.;s;:`-i �..�:. .-r, ` :;l`�,»..:n: .3.. ':d�_t,-r�,4i.� .'S•-.%i..hR:.:y.. , yi�.": :f•_t.��!.R; ` �+v�. .ag,�.I Desczipt�.on �of ProM "',��y. *"s:?" ».} . , _ ,r7'`_.... .:�?�..i•?'�i>sY;,; a.:t;"!»-'�11e'�; x;G."rk'�".:.;'.ti,�.�,:T "� ,.�rr>��NS1#-s«, �.- •• -y � ��✓rt t.in!n gerty: � �. t •..ry. ` _ 4 � � �,,.:,,.:. _ .�, _ ...�. ..�_.�..... �� • i.�i:« � . ., � _..,._. �'�� .- ��"�� ;�s��+E}�'"�G�IL('�7'U .._ .� /M GJU . ! :�: J. � A� C.DG�'';.T�:��'+� � �•�'(l. PrYJ E > �� _.�:.Y _ :Y::: �":' ` ,:�� # : .. • - �•5„ r.,h". - r. m .. - ; •-� . • - ` ;tri ' � .. .: : s.. � .._ - _ �x - -.: :" `'' "'r>+ r�' y'�r::t rii�J /� " +�f!�' �:y,4.:" 'F,. YW"a:P'..;• •i.'4P'jry.�^�. }.:'Y�,t C ,t tRS.i:k'�sv A�iy.in �. �iys�� "1:w .T'�.!��""_ - � L � / /y 2 r / �� iui/ s�C.Fw_'.is• �� ' -F..i'rJ - vi�tl�c.atu .'?:n-'d��'','+'^,S'",_iM, ,.'�..�,.f.: .-. �'.1. .. • . .. 'w/ e'F�4J`� �/+ �rylQ�i.i•� f '�' =_F'+^."� -' . .l?t�«....'�^i^'Ty�• �•!vi yrt~�EYy.l4.... .,. a:^..'-F.1"C.:a� '.. i it�'4NYt..� rM`-.-s%'wr ` ., `Ir—•---,� • v +� I. µ + rt .-' -� '} t�nr. =~..•r-� �.. � � . . , ii'� :w':.,:c^�,.-..` � .r�:�. � _ ��, ` '"" .... , . , . r _ w .�a'..., ?t,_ _ y. ,,;`1'..`,oy �'�•�, :y�,f.�:,:.��....+�:t..,d��.S�,.x `.�`d''�:�:;:'•n.� _;i,``' „ r ' - .....� .._.�-�-` ... .:,�;, -_..;,..: �.s� : v ;t;., ,,�.' �- � . . : .„,�, .,. .. _ . ., y ,'r. ., ,_ , � '. • . , . _ » . _ -. �..._.. ...,, j,;', . -..'':A:: . .. _ . . ;�',-;,� ;x -��;,;,-�"„t,,+E;7;�::'S:'�'3:i�`w;fw.r�;!'!�%: °.:w"°v�'...,:.• ... . , . cr:. , .. , .. . , . .. : �_. _ . - . ... �_. r..,. ,.t.., y.� s-� • ' - .a,�..<,. .�cr�T:.74;:,�i t, n'-�. q+�•• ��.. � ..�. » +'Y'w'S-t�}'. .--�..r. . ' ��w..-. :.. . ��4, . . , ..:5.._� yxti µ,�y.�. � - � " ... � . , . . . . - - � ._ " . . u:P' ' . .. _ . " f:_: .."d,'...i ��.c F.'K.�, �• ij � Y%Zz� . .�. m.�• ' . . _�.u.�� . .s . - ; ... • �r..t^•��o��4 - ' _ ,a.. i'.' '4.:a.".y-a« _dJ, :�^iti'n..,w+!✓ R.k� rv. .Pt" . - . .: . � _ f;'.'k' . nx:;:...:`�:T � .. _...ar." { ..f. 'a, '.�„'rs • ' =Type..of Request�:.:_. ':��:=s . „ . -- � _*Razoning �;"�z�: ..- - ^�- k ' . ..«��.. Y�..-.�,<,...��,:�.,. ~- ._ ;`;La i� �r,� e+� ::rm. �y,h i� f =`''•`, .3:.1....t+..�iAr+n�e�„•�,SFt: �t`�Ti�t"+rri+n.�N�:%, �, ..... . �„ .. ...,..... ra-- . a . . . _ . , . .,. 4arianc.e � . . �., f : r-� r�;�.�: >; � � ��; �.� :. .�,�x; - t � . .' . . � • , a ". • • Conditional Use Pexm3.t . � -.. ,'�,, ..��;, . � , " .. . : ' �_ . °� � �- � � Conditional 'II e Pe�e�mit a f or�P . -:%� `, � ;..., •, ,�:4. :. ;,�i-. ' �ya'�' r "'.°`.:'".�:..'.•,�` n :. . .. ....+` . . . k^s« �;�,.' �,�' s+. � - � :.�r:-�'.,�:�;r�-.,...... - --_ .. s - y U.D:r��nf � .�,�:�: .-�:.. y YXS11„u+R�..�._,�:�... ,.a.a..,az.;. i� ¢� '+ • - , . . . � - .� . a Minor. Condi�ional.. Use Permit.•t; F_.�~ -�.-��. :�`'•:��2. . .r•� ` i�•tur 's .f .,. �:�s.��.� � „�-: �;. �� Y= _ ;�...� ,��:,�,, , , . , . . .-:;�� ,Subdi.vision A�proval �.:�.:�fiw�.�.`:��. .� �w ��.�� =:.�� ':.��.�.�; t :� . •..�. ;�;.�:-��.,.�.-;:• . �: , :::�:,� .., t ,. : ._ .:� �. .t.,�. �. r_ ,�. .. � ��..�._.,.� Plan Approval - - .._:..:: �::._.:�: u ...s.:.�� . . . ..� :�:. ,....�.. _ .��--�__ _ __, ..� , �, _ ..� � _:{.��.'..,,. .... ._. ,_ „_v ..�,� ,,,. _.. . :.'.':' .�.. � - f:��4� , '`*r5,.-.eiu"''.*>,�,�.. ,x�-k..,c ,.,,�. .. .;. �xx-r ,�-;�Wetlands �@i"III�.t•M�'.�?2��,i3;tF1:��As':f2=";�'�n%:trrii'.�'i.�.,x� ��,t=g1�.,< . ... i:i -. .' - - '•t, , , i,y, • ..-�z.a ..w• ;.t y : r�.;i; k�' µ' ;•/.y r .;'y..` j . . � w_. _ „_. . _. .,.- Other .,�., -. k's.;:;:. 't�:.._ - �.:. - r.� `.�� ,, " .�.. , y";'( ., �� .:t::.' . .k.... ".<+;:•� ,•a. �; , . , '�_� - .:t�s w_ v!i�i�:.'` � �' M,i'-'Mt;f( :uv'rh��: �. 'i` • �7"-i'�i�:w -[ - .... T„' • •�� .�X:. �.�:.C","'T't �.,x .,- ._ �.`� '.#«..v. . '� T.} "� ..- .,«. - . x' ,j.`g:�� ' ...r.r ..��:�..I..11'i��7y AY ^Y fi$�jx"5`tfi�' �1 '�y �•y,.4.' �,y�..�'.'r. � �J' %�t;,� � •-�+r;��:is'«' "�::.'- '...:;,. e. „R:F'w: r�...µ .,.y.�y 's��a,�;r.�'3"`.,,.' .{i'".� :r.: t . .a%...:�: �� '`..�•' ��%�S.�T'��` s' .�, -.,=-�D PL t �-i�-�"ii".- ��=��,t.1 ts 1�-� 5 °.��-,,�--o -,.:,,,�r �� S rr� ?"� ��3DU E �.��i� � :_xx .�.. u'c. ,�.�� a: . .:-�,`^�_ `rs�`T;::r:. �:'=.s ;�.1..:. •: ,. :� ^`:v� :' . �.'"' L.��y� �� .�:-.._:�«. _ ,. : ..{,_.,�•�.44•.;,: ::c.. .s:}.',:.,.nr,:��L_ ::�.t..;.�: ....; _.••.,• . ��`�-c� � rri m �sit.� � `��o.�L �-�UUxtT�3—i`r.;a �� `� I C�t3 :� �:T' oF (,�,� � j •LA� �J5 �-;;:`��, ��.�' ;. �,,, ,, T rri.= . ��-,'� . �- -_ - .��w.�_- � :t,_ .,- - �,.�;, x�== ,�_x� .n�-� , ., .` -� �li�•H.... 5� 'i71J ��aT�t2-'��.t�0e277(��2 `'-'`.+��_'�� p g: . +E�%%L/G � „��a� '= ,-�-;,r. 1.�7"'-. LL�,�' �--LL.,:=-.- , •,^�..-_ =..c.r�ron . -_ _ _., ... .' '_.�„ .. . �-.:��_ ��,.,7,,. a.�.,.ar� _ «i,�r ,. .-s y,._�u, ' .. -. ;�.,: r ,��:,"' 4 _ - 'r� � - ' - ,-; ' j�;.=�', `';;�• - , r4' 4�^i Y +� V `� .., "�G/.. ..yNf,�'%r�/� .:. S�G+L�' G�J� = . �:r, � , . . +x� - . ,. .iG;�� .- . - �, rR.S.t�; � t - .. . -� - » . . . ... _ _ ' _ _ ' �-_ -s, - � Y _ ;y:� " :,�'�' ^ _ _ .. - - ... _ _ - , _ _ _ '_r•' • x• - .r- .. , - - _ ..•_ - - :t ' _ . y '.!_ �,."' '. -- - - • __ �"��.Y.. .L._. _ -_ _ � � � .. `_ _ _ - .'�� ", �'2.�y _ :_^'S _ _ _ _ - - - .. ,.. _ _ � - " ^ • . _ , � _. • . ♦ � l.:. . � _ _ _ "' _ _ _ . . � _. " - . .. u- _ ' - wi�'�✓u:.Yl. �,'. " _ . . , ... - -_ _ - L�L!V ' _ �S,�ai.r.'e'.' ' _ i>pz.nr�'w�.��1Y i?:.iy.v" i,+�i...�,��. �:n. - ' > -_ . - ._ - ' -` .__ _._ _ - ' - - ' - -' ' _.. - " - .:r.[^`�. ..+vK-,w: a . ., � - , _ � . . ...�... , - • " '. ' _ ". . _':. ..' -«,�''' . . ' - .., ...., - ' �J' �;}_ - , . . r ": • ... , _ �. . .....- .� ' , . . . _ . , , ., , - _ � .- •- : . . • " , . ... ':, . " t .:-.. .«:,-' .., "« - .s'_. _a�i :; : ' , ' " .. . . . . , _ .� . . _ . ... . . i. . '....n�.:; ..i^.. .r.x•. }.�, .•.••��•: ,•• a • ••� . 1 _ �94 Y L31 .�e.a'T2G.T3Z��+-..J.Yd..11'epflH.`Y'��:WG.+a..M+e•a::.Y�nEGi.:w....�....i9if1:'%,�:v�Ysf:.T�a�«w��"� _ . _. .t........_...._.C...__n-.'xi':"..Tb'�......._.xlaZ'{-i..i'irinw3::... w�w _ r+. ... r +. ' • • ' . , � . •� � ' . • . . .. /� • , . , . . �� '� or�! 1iC • , . . 1 �' ' , ./' t_ N � T` .�" � � " . � • ��J�' . • \ � , .. a �'�' 1�I 9 ' . �r ,� . , • /�/;Num .c3�"',� .� , , . • ^,� �� . �-- 3�,-0'' ' 3�/'rs►,� � . � ' , � �� , �.; ._ , nNQ . �,. ' ' • `o , '+ �► �' � • , � � � . �� r � i �� • , r , ' . , . � „ ,.� � �)- � = • 1�� '�' '�y, �k"' . � . ' ...... �c , , � • , � - , oGL ysr-,r3 � - � „a,91 j X,a! . • � v��,�j�3 /'/ • ., "Q � " ,/!�� Q.� , . . • \ . � � tcnoN /� . j � ° � _ _ � .,� � ,a �3"�' -.t o7 . , . �, f,� �� s t�88'j � � . � p , � ' . ' � ' • � ��Q,..:3� f � 1 � . . ' p• . � , , � j � ' �� ' �CY.� � ��(,/' t��,��i 7'� 3 l.0 � �' t � . , . • . • � � ' , � � • ' , ' � �� " ` .�?,�i O 2 !S'S /y yk 'S� t� OCt /y�'l� . • • , . ' ��,,,p� 7.�Z-��I,� � . , ,, , . . . �,,� �� '�' . , , , . . , . . t ' • � 4 � E - ' -- " CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - --- - - -- �- �-- ---- - - - - MEMO ____ _ April 29, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City itrator � � FROM: Klayton Eckles Civil Engineer - SUBJECT: Sewers, Water, Streets The Ponds of Mendota Heights & Rolling Woods Job No. 8622 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 9 DISCUSSION:, The plans and specifications for the above project are being com- pleted and the title sheet will be available at the meeting Tuesday evening. If the plans and specifications are approved, the bids can be opened and awarded at the June 2nd meeting. RECOMMEND�TION: _ � Staff recommends that the Council approve the plans.and speci- fications and authorize sta.ff to open the project for bidding. ACTION REQUIRED• If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 87- , RESOLUTION ?�PPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IM=�. PROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE PONDS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND ROLLING WOODS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 9) , a . r City of Mendota Heights � � Dakota County, Minnesota RFSOLUTION N0. 87- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE PONDS OF MENDOTA - HEIGHTS AND ROLLING WOODS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 9) t WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvements and construc- tion thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed s costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and � WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed that the City Engineer proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications thereof; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for said im- provements and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the plans and specifications for said improvements be and they are hereby in all respects approved. 2. That the City Clerk with the aid and assistance of the City Engi- neer be and is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said improvements all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes, such bids to be received at the City Hall of the City of - - Mendota Heights by 10:00 o'clock A.M., Tuesday, June 2, 1987, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Engineer will then be tabulated, and will then be considered by the City Council at its next regular Council meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th day of Ma.y;' 1987. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � �• � •��• CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 29, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Councii,=City A� a or � � FROM: � John Maczka, Fire Chie�� G'�-• Dennis Delmont, Chief a Police�� SUBJECT: Fire Department's Respanse to "Medical" 12uns Introduction The Mendota Heights Fire Department's response to assis�C at medical calls has been discussed at recent Council Meetings. This mema will attempC to clarify the criteria for that response. History In I986, �he Mendota Heights Fire Department responded to 71 rescue and medical ca11s. Rescue calls are calls in which specialized equigment is needed to help get the victim aut. Medical calls are those in which the Fire Department is called to assa.st the paramedics ar police officers. Of - thase 71 calls, SQ were classif�.ed as 'tmedicalf`. Of those 5Q, 35 of the calls were in Mendota Heights, five (5) w�re in Mendota, nine (9) in Lilydale and ane {1) in Sunfa.sh Lake. In loaksng further at those calls, af the 50 medicals - seven (7) resulted in full cancellations, six (6) were fully justified calls that required the assistance of the Fa.re Department and the remaining 37 fall inta that gray area where the Fire Department's respanse was questionable. Discussion The respon�e of the Fire Department an certain medical assistance calls is absolutely necessary. A cardiac arrest or similar situation often requires the efforts af anywhere from faur (4} to ei�ht (8} people. If the twa (2} on duty paramedics and the on,.duty police officers are the anly anes available to assist an Chese cal.ls, tben �hase police afficers wi1l be aut af service for the duration of the ca11. In these cases we feel it is apgropriate that the Fire Department respond to assi.st the paramedics and relieves the paZice officers for �heir normal duties. Zt should be nated that when the Fire Department responds, most times only �wo (2) vehicles respond red lights and siren. These vehicles are the rescue track and the chief's car. A pumper may alsa respond jusC routine when enough men are available to staff the trucic, so that equipment is exercised. In mast cases, only $-10 -firefighters are. at the scene and the.,.-.._, •. .. remaining personnel are at the station. -� •� The Mayor has expressed concern on the need for the Fire Department ta respond on medical calls, and we share that concern in the case of the 44 calls�in 1986 where�the Fire Department's response is suspect. rn many of � those cases, it becomes a judgement call on the part of the dispatchers. A frantic family member who calls to tell of a husband or father who is having difficulty breathing, may not be able to determine whether or not that father is having a heart attack, or merely is short of breath. In these cases where there is a serious�question as to the condition of the patient, __ we would rather have the Fire Department sent, then not sent. We do, however, feel that some calls are obviously of the type that can be handled by the paramedics and the on-street police officers. At least they can handle the initial call and if the Fire Departmen� is needed, they can then make the request of the dispatcher. Alternatives We can take the Fire Department completely out of the "medical" business and leave that response to the paramedics and the police officers. If that is the case, however, we must resign ourselves to the fact that the police officers may be tied up for an hour to an hour and a half, or even two hours, on serious medical,calls. A police officer is not going to leave a heart attack or stroke victim to answer a burglar alarm. Not only would the priority be wrong, but the liability assumed by the City may also be great. Another alternative would be to designate specific firefighters to be on call in the event that medical calls are received. This is impractical because it is tantamount to putting people on overtime and restricting their freedom for calls that only happen twice a month at the most. The only alternative that we see as viable is to continue with an all=call Y response to medical calls, but to work more closely with the dispatchers, the paramedics and the police officers to ensure that those calls that are given to the Fire Department are justified and of a serious enough nature that the services of the Fire Department are actually needed. We can achieve this by outlining the specific types of calls where the Fire Department will automatically be called out, and also include these discretionary calls where it would be better to send them than not. The calls that the Fire Department would always respond to would include full cardiac arrest, a patient not breathing, or severe trauma that is going to require many people to serve the victim. Some of the gray area calls would be a person passed out with shallow breathing. Based on our experience of 1986, this would probably cut down our medical responses from 50 to approximately 12.. We believe that this type of system would achieve the purpose of providing the best in emergency health care to the citizens, while at the same time dealing with the question of Fire Department response in a responsible manner. Action Required This memo is in response to concerns expressed by the.Council and no ., �. specific action is required. __ "- _-"� � , _ � . � . , � - ••;• ,• ••:�. Unless Council directs otherwise, Staff will proceed to implement the third alternative above by ','tightening up" the types of inedical calls on which the Fire Deparmtent will be called out. CITY UF i�iC`'DOTA I�tLIGI•ITS Pti1LiYI�Rf�.NDUi1�t � --__. _ . - --- - •-- ---- DATE: 4j29i87 TO: Mayor and City � o nc' • _ City Adminis '� FROM: Chief af Pc� ice�� f,,� SUBJECI': Marriott Caunyard Hotel Limited Service Liquor License INTRUDUCTIQN I have recentiy completed an extensive investigation into the application for a"linuted service" liquar license for the "Courtyard by Marriott" hotel�iri Mendota Hei�hts. Based an that investigation, I feel that the iYlendota Hei�hts propeny will be operafed in accordance with the letter and intent af the applicable ordinance. ' DISCUSSION . In adittion to the steps covered at the recent public hearing, I made on-site visits to two of the existing "Courtyard" hotels. They are located in Fairfaac, Virginia and Landover, Maryland, and they contain two of the higher a ossing food and beverage departments in the system. These two _ hotels are identical in every detail ta the hotel being canstructed in Mendota Heights. I idencified myself to the staff of the Fairfax hotel, but did not at �Landover, I found the same elements in bath Iocarions; very neat and ciean facilities, attractive, high quaiity decor, and attentive and courteous staff and employees. "�Everyane I spoke to appeared to be proud of "their" hotel and the service that they provided. The mood of the hotels was relaxed and very comfortable. The loun�es were furnished with comfortable searing that was suited far low-key gatherings and neither held much at�action for customers off the street. The Marriott philosophy, as expressed by several employees, was to provide attractive and reasonabiy priced Iodging to business and family traveIers. The bevera�e and faod business is merely an amenity provided for guests and not intended to be significant sources of revenue. I spoke to a Lieutenant from the Fairfax�County Police Department and a Patrol Sergeant fram Landover, Maryland. Both aff cers indicated that the need for golicin� the hateis was minimal and that the reladonships be[ween the poiice and the hateis was cooperative and friendly. Both aa eed that the Marriott Corporatian was a"gaad neighbar". RECQMMENDATIQN Based on the invescigation dane by the Poiice Departmens, I would recommend that the "Counyard by Marriott" hotel in Mendata Heights be granted a liquor license, and that the "Iimited service" . , _ license is the mast appropriate. -. a . .. . r _„ _ ,:;�}: � .;,,...: .._ _.,•i� 0 7 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO MAY 1, 1987 TO: Mayor and City Coun il FROM: Kevin D. F ],�/,��it Administrator SUBJECT: Review of Barton-Aschman Contract for Study of Riley Site At its last meeting, Council authorized Mayor Mertensotto and I to enter a contract with Barton Aschman Associates, for a study of the alternative Riley athletic facility site, in an amount not to exceed $3,000. Since the requested proposal was not received until late this week, I have decided to place it on the agenda for your review and consideration prior to entering the contract and having the consultant actually begin work. Also, please note the attached letter from School District 197 Superintendent Bruce Anderson. ACTION REQUIRED: To review the proposed contract, and if acceptable, pass a motion of approval. KDF:madlr • attachments � Barton-Aschman Associates, tnc. 1614 5ouih Sixth Street Minneapalis, Minnesata 55454 612-332-042t April. 28, 1987 Mr. Kevin D. Fraze.�,l Me�ars of the Park an�d R�reati.on Cc�tnnission City af Me.ndota Heights 750 Sauth Plaza Drive Me.ndota Heights, Minnesata 55120 R�e: Ath].etic c�arnplex Analysi.s af Riley Parcel near Mr. F�azell and M�mber: of the Gramni.ssion: Thank yau for the opportunity to assist you with an a�hletic complex feasibility study for the Riley parcel. Consistent with your request, we �have identified the following tasks whieh will campare and aantrast tha Riley al�ernative with the Sabley High School concept. The�e ta�}cs include: A. Determ'uu.ng the mast Zogica7. location far the athletic oomplex witriin the Riley parc:el given tapc�graphyr orientation, access, ves�etation at� abutting land uses. B. Dacument the sitefs development feasibility inaluding grading, utilities, roadway acr�ss and similar requirement�. y C. Prepare a canceptual illustrative sketch plan partxayirig fihe athletic c�l�, its facilities arid general grada.ng. D. Establish a preliminary,cost estimate commensura�e with the facility's concept pian. � We will mak,e every effart possible ta draw direc� comparisons between the Riley alternative and the Sibley High School site. To support this camparison, the developmer� program including the rnzmmber of fie].ds and their related facilities shauld parallel the Sibley concept. •.n.0 �. � .: Campet�sation for the akxsve taslts shall be on an upset maximum basis not to exce� $3, 000. Outrof-poGk�t eacpenses shall be reimbaar�ed a ncludirig travel, subsistence wh.i.le in the field, messengerjdelivery sexvices, comp�ter time, reproduc�ion and the like. 'The City of M�ndo�.a Heic�t� has the right to susp�xid consultant acGivities at any time, at which time Mendota Heights would be billed anly for c�rysultant time ex�x�ded arid expenses inc�.xrrea. � Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Ba�ton Asahman will irrvoice monthly based upon staff time and autrof-pock,et expenses. At the completion of this assignment, a final invoice will be rendered ar�d waul.d be payable within 30 days. Time of Oc�leiia� The Riley analysis will be completed within 45 calendar days of contract receipt. Barton-Aschman will attend one (1) meeting with the Park and R�ecreation Commission as a part of this contrac�t. FYurly �tes The follawirig rates will serve as a basis for this contract. Principal Associates Senior Associates Associates Clerical/Technical $65 per hour $62 per haur $45 per hour $32 per haur r We are certain that this analysis will be of assistance to yau in evaluating the two alternatives. Thank yau for the apportwzity to once again serve yvu in improving Mendota Heights parks. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign both copies and return one for our records, thereby initiating the proj ect. Sinc�x�elY Y�� BAR�iON ASCEII�►N ASSOCIATES, INC. Barry J. Warner Principal Associate � C. Vioe iderit and Its � Contractirig Officex ' S7W/JCM: jk,c • �Mal' 81� � • • ••.� �I� �• - • • �►� • a- �� i� • - .S1CJi13�2 Z�ped Name Date 0 J'nd�enden� Scfiool Dis�ric� No.197 Serving Wesr Saint Paul, Mendoia Heights, Lilydale, Mendota, Sunfish Lake and portions of Eagan and lnver Grove Heights 1897 Delaware Avenue • West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55118 •(612) 681-2300 April 29, 1987 MAY b -� 1.�'id7 Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Manager y City of Mendota Heights 750 So. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Frazell: A brief note to keep you abreast of the Board and staff activities reiating to the athletic complex. As you are aware, the School Board met on April 21, 1987 for the express purpose of identifying any concerns or issues in the tentative agreement which was reached,between the City and the School District. The mission was accomplished as the Board very carefully reviewed the document and identified its concerns. The Board Chairman has reques�ed a revised draft agreement be put togethe,r which reflects language dealing �with the identified concerns. This drafting is in process. A clear majority of the Board has�• indicated strong support for the con- cept. We look forward to subsequent meetings in which the final language can be agreed upon which would be mutually beneficial to both parties. � Sincerely, � /�zuce � ��'✓ Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent of Schools BRA/lm Joyce D. Walker, Chair Herbert G. Strozinsky, Clerk Lee R. Bakewell, Treasurer Bruce R. Anderson, Superintendent of Schools "WE ARE A MEMBER OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUN/TY COMMUNITY" � Kathryn L. Haight, Director John F. Niemeyer, Director Judith Pendergrass, Director � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � APRIL 20, 1987 � TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. F z��ity Administrator �l� SUBJECT: Invitation to Participate in Metropolitan Council Future Planning Effort ' At the Mayor/Manager Breakfast of April 17, Mayor Mertensotto and I heard our District 15 representative, Mary Martin, and newly appointed Metropolitan Council Executive Director David Renz, talk about the Council's strategic planning effort for looking at the future of the region. On that same day, we received the attached invitation from Mary and from Metropolitan Council Chair Steve Keefe, to provide input to the Council's planning effort. I am placing this on the agenda so that the Council, if - it desires, can give a group response to the questionnaire. Since the planning effort seems to be fairly open and unstructured, it would also seem appropriate for individual Council members to give input or get involved as they may wish. ACTION REQUIRED To give staff directive on any group•response that you would like to have submitted. � KDF:madlr � attachment � �fN CIT�t% L April 10, 1987 .� T0: LOCAL OFFICIALS IN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISTRICT 15 Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291-6359 The Metropolitan Couneil would like your help. We'd like to invite your organization to participate in the Council's current strategic planning process, an effort to develop a broadly shared vision for the future of the T�rin Cities Region. We intend to open a dialogue that will bring together the ideas of many citizens of the region, ineluding local governments, business, labor, nonprofit organizations, civic groups and groups with special needs. The enelosed invitation explains our aims and lists a number of potential, long- range concerns for the region the Council has identified. We hope you'll take the time to give us feedback on the list of concerns. We need to know whether you think these coneerns are important future regional issues. whether our focus is sharp enough, and whether we may have missed some important areas altogether. To obtain your ideas, I am available to meet with you in April or May. Please call Guy Peterson of the Council staff, at 291-6527, to make arrangements. If you prefer, you can communicate with us by completing the enclosed short questionnaire and returning it to the Council in the postage-paid envelope that is also enclosed. �- Sineerely, � Mary K.( Council� Distriet Enclosures � An Equal OPPortunity Employer � a Metropolitan Couneil of the Twin Cities Area 30Q Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55301 Tel. b12 291-63591TDD 29i-090� . - . ._ _ .. . -- �--' � � . � _ w = -�Z=,: . Mareh 27, 1987 _ >`i = � ' . - ' -' . TO:� -�� - Metrapolitan Area Local Officials and Citizens FROM: Steve K�eefe, Metropalitan Couneil Chair�... �� ' SUBJECT: An Invitation to Participate in PZanning far the Regiants Future Decisions about our physieal systems and human services are being made right now that will shape the region we live in by the year 2004 and beyond. When we make these decisions--about water quality, transit,�lang-term care, housing--we are affecting our future. Solv3.ng today's problems requires that we have a better idea o#' where we're going in order to lrnow what we should do now. As a result, the Metrapalitan Council has stepped up its strategic planning work this year. Our aim is to develop, with your help, a broadly shared vision of the regiants f`uture, and ia use it as a framework far making tadayts decisions without precluding our future aptions. This "vision" doesn't mean a planned city of the future ar anyth3.ng like that. It's not to pian haw people will live their lives� but to keep aur options open and �be prepared for different eontingeneies. This agproaeh has kept us strang and versa�ile in the past. . . . . - Ta work, a regional vision must be shared braadly. It must refleet what many different segments of our population want. If our aim is �o ensure that the government serviess peaple want are there in the next 20 to 3� y��'s, we need to know now what kinds of lives we�ii want to be living then. •,. An importa.nt part of the Council's work aver the next few years will be to work with others in the region to diseover and present various possibilities and optians. What kinds of jobs will be needed? What kinds af lifesty3.es will people want? What kind of education? We plan to work with many citizens of the region, inclufling lacal governments, businessi labor, nonprofit organizations� civ3.c groups and groups with special needs. As tae develop a shared coneept af just wha� it is that people want for the region, we can make decisions aimed,at creating i�y '' M^ _ ,, • At a strategie planning retreat earlier this month, the Council raised a number � of potential long-range concerns for the regian. The list 3s broad� covering everything from our prized quality of Iife--especiallg as it affeets the region's human resauraes--to finaneial resources for the inirastructure, to pregaring for another energy erisis. We hage yciu and your arganization will _ take time to give the Coune3l feedbaok on this initial lisG of concerns . identified at the retreat (which are not in any special order}:� � . ... ' � • - _. , 0 G r "j c �� 1. Quality oP life, especially as it affects the region's human resources. Seen as one of the region's greatest assets now and into the future. Possible areas o:� focus: - Health services. - Services to older peogle. ,� . - Arts offerings, services and programs. - Effeetive delivery of human services� including less fragmentation - amang services, clearer access points, and eoordination with physical systems; e.g., low-income housing and transportatian. . - Inereased family expeetations far sehools and presaure for schools to assume new roles. • 2. Vitality�of the regional economy, Possible areas of facus: - Implications of service seetor-oriented economy. - Productivity issues, espeeially in view of demographie trends. - Coping with global econamie eompetition. - Anticipating the imgaets af technalogy. - - 3. A mare systematic, long-range look 3.nto social ills. � ' Possible areas of facus: ._- Anal.ysis of the east effectiveness of various integrating strategies� for dealing wi�h soeial ills epnsiderir� the effeets af aIl government systems from edueation arsd training to 1T2C4III@ maintenanee to health . care to economie development. - � - Approaches to cost control based on problem prevent3on. �- " �. Fiseal pianning to pay Far long-term infrastructure before baby boomers reaeh retirement age. , ` Possible areas of focus: • - Finaneial resourees far infrastrueture may be more available during next 20 years than after 2010. - - Need to promote maintenance vs. expansion given la.kely slowdown in regional development. , - Fielping ca�unities plan more integrated� long-range strategies to address inf'z•astructui� issues. �. • 5. Water management CBr`ound and surface water). . . _ Possible areas af focus: ' . - Nonpoint saurces of pollution (e.g., urban runoff, agricultural .' , runaff}: how much is the public willing to pay? �" �� - Impaet on the Twin Cities af potential water shortages in the �� southwest. - Issues assaciated with federal water quali�y permits and�possible ��-' �'��' - - ,�, -_a•- ; impacts on development. ' ' �-�� - -. ' � A � - Groundwater pollution from��sa2id waste disgosal, ir�eluding imgaets beyand the metro area. � ' ' . - Jurisdietional issues among public ageneies in water management. - Effeet af cul.tural. values in tfie way different age graups use water (e.g., for lawns, showers). • _ 6. Affardable housing. Fossib3e areas of`faeus: - Evaluate what works and what doesn't (e.g., Section $ subsidized housing vauehar pragram). - Monitoring of housing programs� sueh as private sector complianee with federal requirements for tenants wi�h lower ineomes. .-�- - Affordability for "working poor" with incomes just above subsidy levels. - Changing housing demand and market conditions related to demographies and other factors. 7. Long-term care costs far the baby-boom papulation. Possible areas of foeu�: - Fiseal planning, given fliture 2arge elderly papulation. - New strategies to reduce future demands on long-term care system. $. Transportation. _ Possible areas of focus: � - . 4 . . _ ... ._.. - Attitudes regarding talerable levels o�' congestion and the eosts to reduce that eongestion. � ' � �, What are the real development and life style goals the transportation system must achieve? • . .- What impaet cangestian has on the achieving af thaae goals. - Impaet i.n the Twin Cities of inereased energy costs in event of a shortage. - , - Impartanee of international travel via the airpor�. - Al.ternative teehno2agy solutions to transportation issues; e.g., subst�tuting telecommunications for transportation. q. ,Comi.ng energy crisis. - r . " _, Possible areas of focus: � �� ti - Ant3.cipating when and lzow large an energy erisis the region may face. Gontingeney plannirzg, especially related to regional system�. - Impaots an development; i.e., current development decisions do not include consideration far a potential energy shortage. - - Impacts an suburbs. ' � � " -' " `�� : -,- ._ . _ _. . 10. Jab retraining. Possible areas of focus: - What works/what doesn't. - Who's providing retraining in publie and private seetors, and how mueh of need is being met? Coordination? Overlap? _�_ - Speeial issues related to disadvantaged popu3ations. - Coneept of investment in human eapital. �. -" - What will the need be over the next 20 years? 11. Disintegration af communities. Passible areas af focus: - Who is moving in and out of the cities, a�d how are the moves related to ehanges in househald formation? � - Impacts of trans3ency and the resulting breakdawn of in£or�al support systems for elderly, children. Possible demands for inereased formal services ta eampensate. •- Impacts of magnet sehools and busing. • -. Grac�.ng scarcity of volunteers due to transieney, twa-worker families, single-parent families. - When will eentral city problems shaw up in first-ring suburbs? 12. Segregation of people in coz�unities. Possible areas of focus: - E18erly housing. � - Concentration of minorities i.n eertain neighborhoods. - Goneentratian of law-ineome papulations. 13• Strategic planning. Possible areas of focus: - Long-term viability of the region. - Value differences among generations and their impaets�on peaple's attitudes and behaviors; e.g., flifferen� demands for services. -� Urban design issues; e:g., planning for reuse of buildings, designing facilitiea far an older papulation (especiallp in inner-ring suburbs), designing transportation as well as buildings #`or extrsme eli.mate, ehanges in development patterns to reileet different econom3.elenergy eanditions. , . • - Anticipating technological change and its impacts, such as new telecoimnunications teehnalogy. Other items discussed at��the retreat and pass3.bly related to one or more of the above coneerns include: - Heroie medieal care. �- . � � � - AIDS. - - Ttain Cities issues.,in relation ta the rural crisis. - Creatinglmaintainirig a stable ta�c base. . ` - Governmental finaneing incentives and disincentives to solve public palicy problems. -� - Coneerns about solid waste palicy direetion given undevelaped parts of system such as recycling and composting. �• � I •J 'i�i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 28, 1987 TO: Mayor, City Council, City i s r or FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Appointment of Receptionist INFORMATION At the last meeting Council authorized the appointment of Mary Jean Erickson to the Receptionist/Clerk-typist position. Mary Jean began work for us the following day, and late that afternoon informed me that she was not interested in continuing her employment with the City. She has had considerable difficulty adjusting to a recent divorce and could not cope with the demands o'f a new job yet in addition to which she had been informed that her former employer will have a position available for her this fall. On Friday morning we offered the position to Nancy Platz who had �been given very favorable reviews in the interview process. Nancy accepted the position and began work on Monday morriing. We have been pleased with Nancy's work over the past two days and believe she will do very well in the position and get along nicely with the staff. RECOMMENDATIONfACTION REQUIRED We recommend that Council pass a motion to confirm the probationary appointment of Nancy Platz as Receptionist/Clerk-typist retroactive to April 27, 1987 at Step A, Grade I of the 1987 pay matrix. � MAY 1, 1987 s CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 0 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D`��!�, City Administrator � SUBJECT: Endorsements for LMC Board of Directors Two people, one of them our own Liz Witt, have asked for Council endorsements to the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors. ELIZABETH WITT As I am sure you are all aware, Liz has recently completed a four-year term on the LMC Board. She would now like to throw her hat in the ring for the position of Vice- Pr`esident.- Past tradition is that the Vice-President automatically becomes President in the following year, so Liz is certainly seeking an important office. Attached is a proposed letter of endorsement for your consideration. BETTY SINDT Betty has been a councilmember in the City of Lakeville since 1980, and active in�the League of Minnesota Cities since 1981. She has served on the League's Development Strategies and Federal Legislation Committees, as well as on the Conference Planning Committee for three years. She is immediate past-president of Minnesota Woanen in City Government. - A suggested letter for Betty's endorsement is also attached. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to endorse these nominations, it should pass a motion authorizing sending the attached letters. • KDF:madlr attachments Administrative Offices CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS May 6, 1987 Nominations Committee League of Minnesota Cities 183 East University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Committee Members: Please accept the nomination of Elizabeth Witt, Mendota Heights Council member, for.Vice President of the League of Minnesota Cities. Over the years,�Liz has been an active supporter and promoter of the League. She has been a responsible and productive LMC Board Member. In addition,. she has ably served as a League Legislative contact and as a member of the Revenue Sources Policy Committee. This year she has worked on the 1987 and 1988 Annual Conference Planning Committee. She also represents the League on the Government Training Service Board. Y Liz is an informed and conscientious member of the Mendota Heights City Council, having served in that capacity since 1979. Liz is employed as an Administrative Assistant for our neighboring City of Eagan. She works to resolve common problems of our communities with the greatest spirit of cooperation. We believe Liz is well prepared to serve as Vice President and, ultimately, as President of the League of Minnesota Cities. She will be an able officer and we enthusiastically support her candidacy. Sincerely, Mendota Heights City Council Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CEM:madlr 750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • 452 -1850 Administrative Offices ' ' v CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS May 6, 1987 Nominations Committee League of Minnesota Cities 183 East University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Committee Members: We are writing to endorse the candidacy of Betty Sindt for a position on the League Board of Directors. In her years as a Lakeville City Council member, Betty has also been very active in inter-community efforts in Dakota County. As you know, Betty has also served on numerous committees for the League of Minnesota Cities. We feel that she would be a capable representative of the interests of the cities throughout the State of Minnesota. Sincerely, Mendota Heights City Council Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor e CEM:madlr 750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 • 452 -1850 � � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO �IAY 1, 1987 , TO: Mayor, City Council and Cit/l�d�li��rator � FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SUBJECT: Expenses Incurred in Park Bond Referendum to 4/15/87 a 1985 - Special Park Study, Barton-Aschman Howard Dahlgren r 1986 - Phase II Study, Barton Aschman 1987 - School Property Study, Barton Aschman Minus School Share � Balance Bond Issue Publication, Printing, etc. Legal NOTE: $19,787.00 182.31 $19,969.31 $13,475.00 $3,358.26 1,679.00 $1,679.26 $2,112.02 1.985.63 $5,776.91 r There are still some minor outstanding bills, which we expect to amount to approximately $1,000 or less, plus approximately $5,500 to Barton Asctiman for promotional planning. Total paid to date: $39,221.22 -� Balance to pay: $6,500.00 LES:madlr CITY OF MENDdTA �iEIGHTS • TO: Mayor, City Council, City Ad �� a�r � FROM: Kathleen M. Swansan City Glerk 5UBJECT: Dog Training in Capperfield INFORMATION At the April 22nd meeting, Councilmember Cummins asked that staf� try to find a solutian to the prablem af wildlife habitat disruption caused by hunting dog training around the ponds in Copperfield. We have reviewed the animal can�rol ordinance and discussed what alternatives might be considered to prohibit the activity causing tha habitat destruction and the use of gunshot �imulators. Unless the dogs being trained are unlicensed, there is na language in the animal con�rol ordinance which provides a possible solution ta the problem. We can, hawever, act under Minnesota Statute 100.29, Subd. 24, which prahibits the training of hunting dogs in fields between Aprii 16 and July 14. As a short term solution, unless otherwise directed by Cauncil, the Police Department will invoke the statutary provisions for complaints registered with the Department. 2ha mast appropriate placa to pravide language prahibiting the training af dogs on public property seems to be in the ordinance which regulates activities in City parks. The ordinance has been in place far many years, is ineffective or unenforceable in some regards and should be reviewed regardless o� the dag training issue. ACTION REOUIRED No actian is required, however Council should give direction to staff on whether the park use ordinance should be reviewed to determine whether it should be amended to include language prohibiting the training af huntzng dogs. 9 � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS April 22; t987- To: Mayor and City Council ' From: Kevin Fr �� ty Administrator Re: Add On Agenda for April 22, 1987 Two items are recommended for addition to this evening's agenda, one of deletion, and additional information is provided for Items 9.b. C.ity Position on Aircraft Flight Corridor, 9.a. Plans and Specs'for Park Place, and 9.f. Appointment of Receptionist. I 3. Acrenda Adoption It is �ecommended that Council approve the agenda with the deletion of Item 5.g. Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses, and the addition of Items 9.g. Position of Legislative Issues� and 9.h.-Authorization for additional Parks study. 5•a• Approval of Rubbish Haulers Licenses = deletion This item was inadvertently placed on the agenda, and there is, in�fact, no rubbish haulers license list to be approved this eqening. 9.b. C,itv Position on Aircraft Fliciht Corridor The Eagan City Council has approved the joint position paper with tYie following addition as a new sentence at the end of the second paragraph on Page 4-"In fact, it was the stated intention of the operations committee that restricting use of the 90�degree heading not create a negative effect for Eagan neighborhoods (also Appendix VIII). � 9.c Att and S,pecs for Park Place a copy of the cover sheet for the plans and specs. 9.f. Appointment of Receptionist Please see attached memorandum from City Clerk Kathy Swanson. ` 9.Q. Position of Legislative Issues � The latest League of Minnesota Cities Bulletin contains several Action Alerts that we may wish to act on. They are attached, and include: Imposition of a 3% levy limit. "Freeze" level funding for Community Development Block Grants Testing for High Risk Occupations In addition, I understand that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities fiscal disparities bill has been introduced in the House by Representative Ann Rest. Of these issues, I would particularly recommend that we write our State legislators opposing the additional levy limit, and supporting the fiscal disparities bil�. _ � ACTION REQUIRED To direct staff on appropriate communication with our legislators and Congressmen. 9.h. Additional Parks Studv At the April 21st joint session, the Parks Commission and Council agreed to have our parks consultant, Barton-Aschman Associates complete a more comprehensive analysis of potential athletic complex sites south of Mendota Heights Rd. _ and east of Dodd Rd. The purpose of the study is so that we can compare the desirability and cost of this location with the alternative of continuing to pursue the joint facility at Henry Sibley High School with School District 197. I was unable to reach consultant Barry Warner today, so do not have a proposal to present to Council. The consultant's similar work on the Henry Sibley site cost $3,120. , ACTION REQUIRED � . - To expedite getting on with the work, I am recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and City Administra�or to negotiate and enter a contract with Bar�on-Aschman for the work in an amo�nt not to exceed $3,000. I i ' I TO: �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Nlayor, City Council, City i Kathleen M. Swanson MEMO April 20, 1987 Adm' ' t��tor City Clerk SUBJECT: Appointment of Receptionist/Clerk-Typist INTRODUCTION� � At the March 17th meeting, Council authorized staff to advertise the receptionist position vacancy and make an appointment recommendation on April 22nd. We have completed the interview process and have offered the position to a candidate subject to Council confirmation'. _ i INFORMATION � � Adverti�sements placed in the Pioneer Press/Dispatch and the Sun Current resulted in fifteen applications. While the number of applications received was small, the quality of the applicants was excellent. After conducting five initial interviews and two follow-up interviews, the position was offered to and accepted by Mary Jean Erickson. I I Mrs. Erickson was a receptionist/secretary for School District 197 for thirteen years at Moreland Elementary School prior to moving to Florida in 1985. She recently returned to Minnesota and has been doing overload and temporary work at Somerset School while looking for a full-time position. Mary Jean has been given an excellent reference from Moreland Principal Gordon Nelson and is well-gualified for the position. We believe that she would be an asset to the City and will fit in well with the Administrative staff. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that Mary Jean Erickson be given probationary appointment,as Receptionist/Clerk-Typist effective April 23rd. In consideration of her qualifications and extensive experience, we further recommend that she be placed at Step B, Grade I bf the 1987 pay matrix at a'starting annual salary of $12,743. ACTION�REQUIRED If Council concurs in the giving probationary appointment 23rd, at Step B, Grade I of the � recommendation it should to Mary Jean Erickson, 1987 pay matrix. _ - pass a motion effective Apr�.l , . ; , Week in � i -; - revl ew .- ctian Alert _ � - _ __ __ F�� PROPERTY TAX BILL C�ULD TIGHTEN LEVY LSMITS w-� Tighter restrietions an levy limits are under consideration in the House and Ssnate Tax Committees as members piece together property tax bi11s. Currently under discussion is a propasal to impase an artiiicial three percent restrietion on levy inereases. There is precedent for sueh action; the 19$5 Legislature aeted ta limit increases in the levy limit base to the rate of inflation (measured by the implicit price deflator} or five percent, whichever is less. � The impetus for further restrietions comes out of fear that tax burdens;on propsrty taxpayers eould rise preeipitously next year as the state pumps less maney into property tax relief programs such as lacal government aid and homestead eredit. . The L�ague's 1986-87 City Budget Survey found that eities' levies are not'driven by increased city spending, rather, faetors outside cities', contral--namely, the loss of federal general revenue sharing and insufficient LGA are causing the �increases {see chart below): Furthermore, given the diverse problems and cireumstances cities are facing, unifarm limits are arbitrary and impraetieal. The limi�s are ineonsistent with the prineiples of local self-government and accountability. CITY OFFIGIALS SHClULD IMMEDIATELY GONTACT THEIR LEGISLATORS IN C1PP4SITION TC? ANY FURTHER TIGHTENING OF LEVY LIMITS. (mare) . F-1 ederal update - ction Alert �� ` - � - TIES SHOULD URGE CONGRESS TO FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �� ;�:Cities must continue to lobby Minnesota members of Congress. If »congressmen don't hear about city concerns, they can argue that }proposals do not appear to damage cities' ability to maintain •housing, jobs, infrastructure, or services or interfere with local Egovernment funetions. _ �Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve a 1988 House budget resolution maintaining current �(1987)'levels of funding for Community Development Block Grants as well as wastewater treatment construction grants, highway and transit assistance, and assisted housing programs. But the situation in the Senate is much less favorable. � The Senate Budget Committee failed to reach agreement on a final budget�resolution and, as a result, sent to the Senate floor, not one, but four resolutions without recommendation. In committee votes„ Senator Boschwitz was recorded in support of a proposal that would have severely reduced FY'88 funding for city programs. Although Senator Boschwitz's vote may l�rgely have indicated concern for making substantial deficit reductions, he needs to be reminded of his earlier commitment to refrain from further cuts to programs for cities. (In comments during meetings with city officials in Washington, the Senator had commented that a"freeze" level of federal funding for domestic programs was a reasonable objective in federal budget-making decisions.) . ; ` It is likely that debate on the Senate budget resolution(s) will take place on the Senate floor next week and may take up to two weeks to resolve. Once the Senate approves a budget resolution, it will go to a Senate-House conference committee where members will have to reach a compromise. It is critical for cities to ar�ue vigorously on behalf of maintai.ning the "freeze" level of funding for local programs. � , CDBG funding is directly threatened by proposals offered by the Senate'Budget Committee Chairman Lawton Chiles (D-F1). Other proposed budget resolutions also reduce federal assistance to cities;by as much as 30 percent. There are indications that the Republican leadership in the Senate will offer alternative budget proposals. In that regard, cities should contact Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger to point out the local impact of cuts to housing, environment, infrastructure, community and economic development, and other federal assistance. �-�-• • . - , , . F-2 j , / ; NEW MANDATE PROPOSALS SURFACE � If federal budget threats were not enough, a move is underway to require cities to provide and pay for the costs of inedical monitoring of employees that the federal government determines are high-risk employees for certain diseases. The proposal (HR 162), the High�Risk Occupational Disease Notification and Prevention Act of 1987 „ could result in classification of many city employees as members of high risk oceupational groups. Such findings would then impose on cities an unfunded obligation to take measures to provide health screening and treatment. , . Such exposure to hazardous materials has been addressed at the state and local levels, but this legislation is on a broader scale and would also be likely to cover stress-related complaints. HR 162 not only would apply to current city employees but al.so to former city personnel and to both previous as well as current exposures to risk of disease. T'he legislation refers to "hazardous occupational exposure" as any work activity associated with the risk of disease. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would recommend which categories of employees would be at risk. 'i The biggest concerns are that at the employee's request, cities would need to provide a� testing, evaluation, and medical monitoring related to the employee's "hazardous occupational exposure;" including exposure�which accurred during previous employment (for private as well as publie employers). If a� part of the exposure occurred during the employee's current job tenure with the;city, the city would need to provide all such medical attention at no cost to the employee. Further, if the exposure occurred�prior to the city hiring the employee, the city would still have to pay for medical services. And if the employee's physician determines that the individual must temporarily or permanently move to a less hazardous job, the city must provide that change in employee status without reducing salary, benefits, and seniority. House Education and Labor Subcommittee on Health and Safety will consider,the bill April 23. The full committee is likely to take it up in early May. Action on the House floor could come as soon as June.! The bill would go into effect six months after it is signed into law. City officials need to urge House members (including Representative Tim Penney, a member of the House Education and Labor Committee) to oppose HR 162 unless it is modified. Similar legislation (S. 79) is pending in'the Senate, but it is apparently less broad in its scope'and has been modified to respond to employer concerns. :� �