The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-01-20r� 2. 2. 3.s• 4. 5. 60 76 8. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGFiTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JANUARY 2Q, 198"7 - 7:30 P.M. Call to Order. � . 3 � . Rall Call. -- �'(;� �,,,�`- , A enda Ad pt ' on ."' � j -� n`��...t '�.�,�� - �'',�,x` ��,,,� App oval of Minutes, January 6 and January 13 Consent Calendar:� � c. d. f. g- � /t �-�"L.,.' � f � Special. �. ; � Acknowledgement of December Treasurer's Report. Acknowledgement of December Fire Dept. Report. -��.1"".�!� Acknowledgement of Engineers Monthy Report. Acknawledgement of Letter from MA.SAC. ; � Approval of Bu2ldin 't for omserv ,(� ,355 M d.ota Heights Road) . -- ��y��l� ' „�.�s+�a�:�• �r`� ' Approval of the List af Cla ms. (Available Tuesday).� Approval o� the List of Licenses. End of Consent Calendar. Public Comments -- �- � Intraductions - �.. �„ Unfinished and New Business: a. Commen-�.s for Noise Budget Hearing -(B. Friel will be present). b. Develop ent of L erj� S�ite (C. No w�z�}�- be present). �.c�. ,� G��"' ��-.�`'�'� `� �.�rSu,�.�..-% d�+�r��,-�%,-�. c. Dzscusszon of Architects Cantract for City Ha11 and,,,�- P o ect Budget. . Pierce will be present}, �.� �� - r -t - �-��`�- �',�+,s/.,�,,,� ��.��,,,� f ��o �o ,� C' ��' �.,�. d. C i s i n A po'` tm n s.- /(' � � 3`.,t�' ,� _ ��'•��. ; -�.r. �.�. �,�- �,,,�.. , �..� � , � �. e. Pe ztion for �P k Place Improvements. (Reso utian Na. 87-Q8 ) • -' �i f. Building Permit for Baptist Hospital. -/'� ' g e Building Permit Fee Schedules .-�,,,,, j� � F'� }�` ,�� •� he Discussian of Sewer Utility Rates. -- �°�� ...s- -�� i. Tax Anticipation Certificates .-- %�� P j. Zaning Restrictian on Kenneling. -�j� �.,. ,% �� ' v T � �?�.c.�'{.�"`"r�. , • "�"�'� i��`-�� ..ne^�tl� �- 2vn.,,,✓";�. 6�Z....;i[/�c . t' �.- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA k. Spring Creek Acres Feasibility Report. (Resolution,�to. 87-09 ) • ' � 10. Response to Council Comments. 11. Council Comments. 12�. Closed Session to Discuss 1987 Public Works Negotiations. (Information will be provided Tuesday evening). _ � 13 . Adj ourn .� g�, 3 5� �� a l �O�-fit /'�-Q.�-��+� �/f !'J `'�.o.`f"' ^ ; a a i CITY OF MENDOTA FiEIGHTS I� MEMO + r January 20, 198? Mayor and City Council � � . Kevin D. Fra �C�ty Administrator � Add-�n Agenda far January 20, 1987 F i i item is recommended for additian ta the aqenda, and ane deletion. Additional zn�ormation is provided for two � s. � � 3. Agenda Adoption j � It is recammended that Cauncil adopt the agenda with the (� ad ition af Item 3 1/2. Mayoral Proclamatian of Heart Month, an de3etzon of Item 22. Clased session ta discuss public � wo ks labar negotiations. ' i � 3 2. Mayoral Proclamatian o� kieart Month � At ached is information and a proposed proclamatian provide"d by the American Heart Association, designating February as E He rt Month, � � List af Claims � At ached is the List oi Ciaims. We are between camputer j sy tems as we complete canversiaz2 from LOGIS to our in-house ne wark. There�ore, you will natice the new format. ; � 8. . Discussion of City Ha7.l Architect's Cantract and Pra� ect Bu,dget ! I Ma or Mertensatto has prapased that the scope o�' the project ou lined in�the cantract be cut back to the 18,440 originally ci ed in the Citizen's Cammittee report, and that maximum � co structian cc�st be set at $1,250,000. Further, he has ; pe suaded the architect's to agree to a 70, rather than 80 � fe , but deleting the $4,750 credit from their previous work. Att$ached is a revised project budget, incorparating these The yGa�. s j reduction in construction cost budget reflects not only� � . II P some reduction of square footage, but also reduces the per foot cost by about $6.00. While I have no disagreement with using this figure, I think it is important that everyone � understands up front that sticking with such a budget will affect the type of City Hall we can build. : Architect Bob Pierce will be present for tonight's discussion. After adequate discussion between Council, Pierce, and staff, Council should: 1. Pass a motion approving the architect's contract with whatever revisions are agreed upon. 2. Approve a budget reflecting the Council consensus. 3. Appropriate whatever additional funds are necessary to the City Hall Sinking Fund to complete Phase I work. $70,000� is'currently in'the budget. 12. Closed session to discuss public works negotiations. The public works bargaining unit has decided to await a master contract settlement between the Metropolitan Area Manager's Association and Local '49, prior to agreeing to a local settlement. Therefore, I do not need to meet with Council in closed session this evening, and this item can be deleted from the agenda. r .ti � "`'�` h � ��y r , Suite 195 2177 Yaungman Avenue St. f'a�al, Minnesota 55116 (612} 69E?-5216 American Heart Association Minnesota Affiiliate, lnc. Metropalitan Region January 14, 1987 Mavor Charles Martensotto City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendata Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Martensotto: New year greetings frc�m the staf£ and volunte�rs of the American Heart Association's Metro Region. ` . . , i February is designated natianally as the Heart Month. Once again, in our annual promotional campaign to highlight'the Heart MoTlthr we seek your support. As the chief-executive officer af your community, your task is an impartant one-- that of signing the enclosed Mayaral Proclamation. We are requesting news media coverage of alI our promotional activities during the Heart Month, including the mayoral proclama�ions in the Twin Cities and suburbs. � � Encl.osed are a brochure describing our Dining a'la Heart program and a iist of area restaurants participating in'it. We hope you wauld take the time to review the brochure and patronize the restaurants while dining out in February.`; We would greatly appreciate your help promote heart healthy lifestyles among will 3oak forward to your respanse. Sincere].y, �� ' Saila S. Rao Public Relations /maa enc. WERE FIGHTING FOR YOUR LIFE Coordinator in our effarts ta', area residents. iWe , ; � 1 I ; � ! � � � � � United Way Participating Agency e - �► �' � � � Whereas; diseases af #he heart and blood vessets are responsible far more deaths than all other causes combined—causing widespread suffering and often creating serious persanal hardships in our homes and businesses. And Whereas; the Heart Assaczation carries forward a relentless fighi against these diseases through i#s programs of reserch, education, and comrnuniiy service as made possible ihrough public contributions ta the � American Heart A�sociation Minnesota A�f�iliate, Inc. THEREFORE: I proclaim February to be Heart Month wi#hin the jurisdiction of � my affice and call upan all our citizens to support the American Heart Association with their gifts and voluntary effarts. . r- DATE • SIGNA"fURE ' , ' ' . � . _ :; ' .. _� •-,=..� .. �,�TMS LIST /20/87 19 Jan 1487 ;:55 PM -- Dept lo–r.dm � . 15–�r:g 20–Pol'ce 30–Fir 40–CE:O A T & T AMl�1 AMERICAN BU: City of MendoLa Meights � � Peynent Transaction Li ing �� Dept 50–Rd & Bridge 60–Utilities 70–Parks 80–Planning 90–Animal �or.t_O1 — �INESS FORMS BUSINESS SO TWARE BATTERY & T RE WHOLSpr.F BILLS GUN S �%Y BROWN & CFi S IIvC BANYON DATA SYSTEMS CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQ REGZONAL FFI ASSN Fr-=-.: �':�_'�� . e:- � Page 1 � Account Ntmber Amount Due Date Check � Check Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • E 01421031530 Z.OS 020910 20-Jan-87 � 01421005050 COh1MENTS LD Calls 1.04 � *3.12 . E 01440411010 1,571.00 020011 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Mbrshp Dues *1,571.00 : E 15430506060 465.38 * 4 6 5.3 �Z0012 20-Jan-87 � COMMENTS Utility Bills I E 01440211010 19.97 020913 20-Jan-87 � COMMENTS Renewal * 19' 97 I � E 01433049050 154.71 020914 20-Jan•87 f COMMENTS Batteries ` E 01433044020 37.80 020914 20-Jan•87 COMMENTS Oil Filters E 01433049050 18.85 020014 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc E 01433049070 18.85 020014 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS MisC E 15433049060 18.84 020014 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc *243.05 E 01430502020 14.30 020915 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Patches * 14.30 E 95446082200 114,334.97 020916 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Pymt 2 84-4 *114,334.97 � • E•01422013310 1,395.00 020917 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc *1, 395. 00 E 15430506060 18.00 020918 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Goves E 01430507070 21.00 020918 20-Jan-87 � COMMENTS Gloves * 39.00 01440403030 • 25.00 020919 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues Regt FF * 25.Ov D OTA COUNTY C ASSN D OTA COUNTY UDITOR FIrZST Nb►TIONAL MPLS ^ RST TRUST 'C CHEMICAL C( �VT BUSINESS : HANK � Accant Nunber Amount Due Date Check # Check Oate ...................................�----------•---------------------•---------.. E 01440403030 30.00 020920 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues * 30.00 E 01449011010 •30.40 020921' �20-Jan-87 COAIMENTS Forms * 30.40 E 14445600000 4,600.00 020922 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 77 Bds E 14422600000 100.00 020922 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Fee 77 Bds *4,700.00 E 85445600000 81,093.75 020023 02-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 86 Bds G 162115 E 16445600000 G 752115 E 75445600000 E 42445600000 E 74445600000 E 01433046030 G 012010 E 01430503030 E 01440303030 � i E 01430507070 � i 100,000.00 020023 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 83 Tif Bds 34,300.00 020923 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 83 Bds 110,000.00 020023 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 85 Bds 51,287.50 020023 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 85 Bds 51,750.00 020023 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 82 Bds 25,932.50 020023 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 83 Bds *454 ,363.75 ' 164.34 020024 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Rust Buster *164.34 278.02 020025 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Flags Election *278, p2 14.68 020026 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc 15.90 020026 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc 4�•17 020926 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Mi sc *'j'] , � 5 ;.TiS OFFICE MACHINE �RT KAUFMAN J CITY MGMT ASSN J CHIEF POLICE A.�SN J ASSN OF CD DIRECTOR J DIV I A I � STATE FIRE CH ASSN Ct0 SALES - � -- - - -- �--- _. __ .. Accant Nunber Artaunt Due Date Check # Check Date ----------------------------------------�-----------------._......._.....--•- E 01433049030 45.00 020927 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Con2r � a E 01433049020 90.00 020027 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Contr E 01433049050 • 45.00 020927 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Contr E 01433049010 90.00 020927 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Contr E 05433049015 45.00 020027 20-Jan•87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Contr *315.00 E 15433047560 225.00 020928 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Sur Backup Expense *225.00 E 01440411010 35.00 020929 20-Jan-87 CIN�IMENTS 87 Dues *35.00 E 01440411010 5.00 020930 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues * 5.00 E 01440402020 30.00 020931 20-Jan-87 CQMMENTS 87 Dues *30.00 E 07440400000 Z0.00 020932 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues *20.00 E 01440402020 10.00 020033 20-Jan-87 • COMMENTS 87 Dues *10.00 E 01440403030 90.00 020934 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues *90.00 E 01433049010 685.00 020935 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Copier E 05433049015 342.50 020935 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Copies E 01449004040 68.50 020935 20•Jan-87 C�IMENTS 87 Mtcn Copi es E 01449008080 68.50 020935 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Mtcn Copies = 01433049050 68.50 020935 20-Jan-87 COMI�IENTS 87 Mtcn Copi es c 01433049070 68.50 020935 ZO-Jan•87 � COi�1MENTS 8T Mtcn Copi er ; � i INN $TATE FIF : R SIGl3 GO ,. P C A ItiT RTH STAR CIiA CORP R�& D COPIER S1 E DEPT A.�S1�I w:f � Account Nimber Mrount Oue Date Check # Check Date -•------------• .......................................................•------ E 15433049060 68.50 420935 20-Jan-87 , COt�lMENTS 8T Mtcn Copies *I��?a.00 �, . .. E 01440403030 90.00 020936 20-Jan-87 COMFfENTS 87 Oues *gp, 00 E Oi442005054 72.54 �72.54 Q20435 20-Jan-&7 CdMMENTS Signs E 284232$3700 80.00 020938 20-,ian-87 COMMENTS uEA Sur Ext *80. QO E 0144Q404040 25.00 020939 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 87 Dues *25.00 E Q14330G9010 57.OS 02q940 20-dan-87 COMMEN7S 2 Ma& 86 Mtcn E 05433049015 57.04 02q940 20-Jan-87 COMMEN7S 2 Mos 8b Mtcn *114. Q9 E Q1430011010 183.00 020941 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Copier Aaper E 454300105i5 97.50 02044i 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Copier Paper E 014300Q4040 'f8.30 02044'1 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Copier Paper E 01430005050 18.3d 620941 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Copier Paper = q1430007070 18.30 02Q941 20-Jan-87 CQMMENTS Copier Paper ° 15430006060 18.30 020941 20-Jan-87 COMMEN7S Ccpier Paper c 01430008080 18.30 02Q941 20-Jan•87 COMME?tTS Copi er Faper � c 074300'l1010 't45.OQ 420441 20-dan•87 COMMENi5 7oner i � OS43Q010515 ?2.50 020441 2Q-Jan•87 COMMENTS Toner 01430004040 14.50 02094i 20-Jan•87 COMMENTS Toner q1430005050 14.50 002094 20-Jan•87 COM?IENTS Toner D RAGAN INC PAUL STAMP WORKS ESE OIL CO 60UNTY LEOA B WHITACRE � ---------__.V.__. ___ _ iAceount Nimber Artaunt Due Date Check tt Check Date ,------------------------------------------------------------�----...------•-• E 01430007070 14.50 020941 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Toner . � E 15430006060 14.50 020941 20-.1an-87 COMMENTS Toner E 01430008080 14.50 020941 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Toner *656.00 E 01433049050 405.12 020942 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Tires/Mtg E 01433049050 405.12 020942 20-Jan-87 • COMMENTS Tires/Mtg E 15433049060 25.00 020942 20-Jan•87 COMMENTS Mtg E 01433049070 50.00 020942 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Mtg E 01433049050 58.00 020942 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Mtg *943.24 E 01449010909 �14.60 020943 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Name Plate *14.60 E 01449003030 253.30 *253.30 020944 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS CC i�hse Fi re E 01440402020 35.00 020945 20-Jan-87 . COMMENTS 87 Dues Lange *35.00 E 01430507070 122.47 020946 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc *122.47 � ♦ 2� .tan 1987 T �e 9:28 AM �.I3I�SC?d �l �1 fi & T BAL1�-: �ap•. City o4 ktr�dot3 Heignts Paymenc 'ransaccion i.istin3 AccaunL :V�uttber Amount ?ue Cate C�ec!c = Checx �a-z --------------------------------------�•-----�-----..__...__.......---...--•- E 3443058420II S.�e� 020002 ZO-.:an-87 ceMMet�rs a�ue i i �� E .,74430�13�.2CII 43.C� Q200C2 GO-�81"i'�7 ' � CCMMEliTS Misc = Q543G510515 351.51 Q2C002 ZO-Jam 87 COMMEkTS �iisC *399» 76 : 35445ti0Q000 57,4i0.L0 �J2G004 20•Jan•37 CflNME�tTS Int 80 B�s � 352115 zzo,�ao.00 �20G0� ?o-.,a�-a7 CCMME�tTS Frinc 34 �ds : 354cL5000�0 �04.v8 G20004 20-.tan•d7 CGMMENTS Fee 30 3as : 94lw5b000d0 4,225.�0 024�J04 2fl-Jan-3r COMME?I7S int 7C Bas i 142315 b5,�00.�0 020005 20•Jan-87 CCMME'�TS Pri�c 70 3ds : 144ZZbC0000 69.:c� 02�004 20-Jam E7 CCMMENTS Pea ?0 flds i 2�4L550q000 ?1,532..0 02"u00G ZO•�an•37 CO+iME'its Int 78 Bds : 2542c600000 50.00 02Q0�4 20•„an�37 .� CGMME?7T5 F�e �8 3�s 14�:.SC,OOOQ� t,d80.v0 Q24�,QG 20-3an•37 CCMME?17S Int '1 Bds 14•;�2bOQ00� SQ.�O 020G�4 2�-�an-d7 , C,^�1ME'iT5 2ee 71 3ds *3:.�,780.03 0142?002C2�7 27.-.'.� 0��007 20-:ar,-3? C.^,MMEHTa ,;an Svc OiGt',007C7D 6.;� ' 02C007 20-,;-on•37 CCMMF�tTS 1sL Qtr ; i ;.;:._,�.::..: ri. ,�. _ ; "yM �. ��..+c�� 4�'.�:' �'sv° �.T,. � J AUTO SUPPLY RD OF WATER COMMIS$IUNERS nTN PHOTO 5: MOTOR SUPPLY CUTON SYSTEMS ;ST BANK ST. PF_UL Account Nunber Artaunt Due Date Check # Check Date ---------------------------------------------------------•------•----------... E 01421002020 0.37 020007 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc *34.96 1 E 15433049060 2.58 020008 ` 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Filter E 01433049050 2.83 020008 20•Jan-87 COMMEHTS Misc E 15433049060 2.58 020008 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc E 15433049060 10.32 020008 20-Jan-87 . COMMENTS Misc E 15433049060 18.42 020008 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc *36.73 E 01442531050 10.00 020009 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 01442531070 10.00 020009 ZO-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 15442531060 10.01 020009 20-Jan-87 . COMMENTS Dec Svc G 012010 91.12 020009 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 01442531530 80.00 020009 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Auto Fire Sply *2p1.13 E 01430502020 72.44 * 7 2.44 020011 20-Jan•87 COMMENTS Film E 01433044020 82.91 020017 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Parts E 01433044020 102.90 020017 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Parts 2225 � E 01433044020 55.00 *240.81 020017 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Core e 01433049020 120.00 *120.00 020033 20-Jan-BT COMMENTS Repl Sta 13 c 11445600000 7,100.00 020034 20-Jan•87 COMMEN7S Int 72 Bds E 11422600000 100.00 020034 20-Jan•87 I COMMENTS fee 72 Bds � � � CEiERS RC � �S INS "�CIT HP l � Account N�mber Amount Due Date Check # Check Date -------------------------------------------------------•---------•------------ E 14445600000 9,920.00 020034 20•Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 73 Bds � . E 14422600000 100.00 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Fee 73 Bds E 14445600000 9,512.70 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 77 Bds E 25445600000 1,295.80 020034 20•Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 77 Bds E 30445600000 2,509.00 020034 20-Jan-87 � COMMENT.S Int 77 Bds E 14422600000 100.00 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Fee 77 Bds E 14445600000 1,857.50 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 76 Bds E 14422600000 100.00 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Fee 76 Bds E 37445600000 39,477.50 020034 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 78 Bds E 37422600000 100.00 020034 20-Jan-87 '' COMMENTS Fee 78 eds *72 ,172 . 5 0 E 01433044020 12.00 *12.00 020035 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Headlamp 2217 G 012072 106.92 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413411010 71.11 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll G 012072 109.60 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/16 Payroll E 01413411010 73.95 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/16 Payroll *361.58 G 012072 250.00 *250.00 020050 ZO•Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem ' 012075 012074 148.00 *148.00 020068 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Dues COMMENTS Jan Ins 7.38 020069 20-Jan-87 LS CENTERS DOTA HEIGHTS RUBBISH � �WEST SIRE SERVICE NESOTA BENEFIT ASS1F Account Ntnber Artaunt Due Date Check # Check Date -------------------------------------------------------•------------...------ E 01413102020 369.43 020069 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Ins � � G 012074 157.47 020069 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Dental E 014131020Z0 92.58 020069 20-,1an-87 COMMENTS Dental Ins *626.86 G 012010 �.�$•SZ *1,998.5�20070 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc G 012074 452.84 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413111010 841.25 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 05413110515 591.45 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413102020 1,442.91 020074 20-Jan-87 CQ�IMENTS Jan Prem E 01413104040 175.00 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413105050 713.05 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 15473106060 141.60 020074 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413107070 66.45 *4,424.5�20074 ZO-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem G 012010 34.50 020076 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 01428031050 19.15 020076 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 01428031070 . 19.15 020076 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Svc E 15428031060 19.20 020076 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Dec Sve *92.00 E 07433000000 62.40 *62.4 0 020080 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Mtcn G 012074 55.45 020084 20-Jan-87 j COliMENTS Jan Prem � BELL I Account Nuriber M�ount Due Date Check # Check Date ,----------�-------------------------------- E 15421231060 714.84 020099 20-Jan-87 COIiMENTS Jan Svc � � E 01421231070 714.84 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421232070 181.50 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 15421240060 15.51 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421131530 314.54 020099 20-Jan-87 ' .COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421131050 191.T1 020049 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 15421131060 191.77 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421131070 191.77 020099 20•Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421142050 104.59 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421132070 227.65 020099 20-Jan•87 COt�1MENTS Jan Svc E 15421140060 263.49 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc � E 01421130050 338.59 020099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc *4,635.53 E 05421010515 19.50 020100 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421002020 39.85 020100 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc ♦ E 15421006060 317.21� 020100 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421005050 34.57 020100 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421007070 120.49 020100 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc • E 01421011010 285.20 020100 20-Jan•87 CDMMENTS Jan Svc I 0 MINN DEPT OF REVENUE MTNNESOTA MUTITAL iI�IS M:LNN TEAM5T'ERS LOCAL 320 IVELSON RAI}TO COMMLTI�TICATTONS I110RTFiERN STATE POW,.R � Account Nunber Amowt Due Date Check # Check Date ..._..--�----•------------------------•-----•----.....---.._.__....__....._... E 01413111014 138.00 020084 20�Jan-87 CQMNENiS Jan Prem �► ,. E 05413110515 101.00 020084 20-Jan-87 COMMEH7S Jan Prem E t17473102020 18T.44 020084 ZO-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem � 154i310bOb0 1b.49 Q20084 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E Oi4i3107070 234.50 020084 20-Jan-87 . COMMENTS Jan Prem E 0141310505Q 89.00 020084 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 2341310?323 60.Op 020000 20•Jen-87 GQMMEN7S Jan Prem *887 - �$ E 01432Qq5050 27.37 * 2 y,3'7 020085 20-Jan-87 COMMEN'iS Dec Fuei Tax G 012074 1Q.20 020Q88 20-Jan-87 COMMEN?S Jan Prem E Oi413i'11010 5.10 020Q88 2Q-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01Gi31p2020 10.20 020D88 20-Jan-87 , ,' COMMENTS Jan Prem E 15413106060 1.70 020088 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413107070 3.40 020088 20-dan-87 GUMMENTS Jan Frem E 05413110515 1.70 p2(1�88 20-Jan-87 CQMMEN7S Jan Prem * 32.30 � G 012075 144.00 * 02QQ84 20-Jan-87 � 144.04 COMMEN7S Jan Dues E 01433045020 23.?5 * 2� . 2� QZ0047 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Mtcn E Oi421?3'E530 464.83 d20099 20-dan•87 COMMENTS Jan Svc E 01421231050 • ?14.84 02Q099 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Svc 1� �sT sArrx r SFRVIC M�RWICK N �� i.:,,,`..- __...�....___._.. _ -- - Account Nunber Artiount Due Date Check tt Check Date � E q1421002020 171.12 020100 20-Jan•87 � COMMENTS Jan Svc i � E 05421010515 57.08 020100 20-Jan-87 CQMMEHTS ,Ian Svc ,t� � Q�� . �2 G 202115 79,215.00 p20103 20-,1an-87 COMMENTS Princ 79 Bds 6 2521iS 15,785.Q0 020'IO2 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Princ 79 Bds E 20445600Q00 3,685.0� 020104 20-dan-87 � � • COMMENT5 Inx 79 Bds E 25445600000 3,027.50 020101 20-Jan•87 CQMMENTS Int T9 Bds E 25422bOp000 17.40 020101 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Fee 74 Sds E 1444560q000 1,650.00 020101 20-Jan-87 C4MFtEHTS Int 75 Bds E 14422b00000 E 1fi445b000�0 E 14422bq000d E 01430503030 E 01422013010 E QS422013015 E 21422013000 E 'tQ4220130�0 E ib4220'I3000 t E 0342Z013000 1.50 0202Q1 20-Jan-87 COMM£NiS Pee ?5 BdS 8,SQb.25 Q20101 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Int 72 Bds 4.75 020101 20-Jan•87 Ct?MMEN7S Fee 7Z Bds *,� 1, 8 97 . 40 12.60 *12. �� '�Q105 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Demurrage 12/15 2,375.00 02q106 20-Jan-87 GOMMENTS Progress BilEing 415.00 020106 20-Jan•87 C4MMEN7S Progress Biiting ti b0.00� 020106 2Q-Jan-$7 COMMEN'f5 Progress Bilting 60.OD 020106 2�-�art-87 COMMENTS Progress Billing 48Q.00 Q201Qb 20-Jan•87 COMMENtS Progress Billing 320.00 02q106 20-Jan•87 CCIMMENTS Pragress Billing . . � Account Number Amount Due Date Check # Check Date •-----------�---------------------------------------------•------------------•- - E 15422013060 305.00 020106 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Progress Billing � � E 14422013000 985.00 020106 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Progress Bi l l ing *5 , 000. 00 R A G 012074 9.00 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 05413110515 9.00 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413111010 18.00 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem E 01413102020 9.00 020111 20-Jan-87 C�IMENTS Jan Prem G 012062 2,146.58 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413411010 150.39 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413402020 1,330.18 020111 20-Jan-87 CQMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413402120 722.05 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413403030 8.24 020111 20-Jan-87 C�IMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413404040 48.58 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413405050 172.69 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 01413407070 99.62 020111 20-Jan•87 C�IMENTS 1/2 Payroll 1 E 15413406060 � 59.68 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 05413410515 227.29 020111 20•Jan•87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payroll E 23413402323 52.31 020111 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 1/2 Payrol l *5 , 062 . 61 T OFFZCE PRODUCTS • E 05430010515 7.50 020115 20-Jan•87 ICOMMENTS Sht Pret� I�� ' •s Account Ntmber Amount Due Date Check # Check Date ---------------------------------------------•-------.....-----------------.... E 05430010515 1.31 020115 20•Jan-87 COMMENTS Pencils � E 05430010515 2.21 020115 ` 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Calendar E 01430003030 E 01430007070 E 01430005050 E 15430006060 E 05430010515 E 01430002020 E 01430002020 E 01430002020 E 01430002020 E 01430011010 E 01430011010 STRIES E 01420061070 � � E 01420061070 TRUSTEE i G 012071 E 01413102020 IE 01413105050 2.44 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Cal Refill 2.55 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Cal Refill 7.65 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Cal Refill 2.55 020175 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Cal Refill 5.10 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Cal Refill 18.76 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Splys 61.72 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Splys 14.04 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Splys 20.74 020115 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Splys 36.30 020175 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Desk Calendars 110.65 020115 20•Jan-87 COMMENTS Misc Splys *293.52 394.28 020116 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS 12/5 thru 1/29 -20.76 020116 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Pickup Credit *373.52 66.83 020139 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem 29.57 020139 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem 24.10 020139 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem CERN LIFE INS TOTAL 7AL CHECKS )1 15.00 �2 294.84 )3 478.68 �4 29.83 )5 218.00 �6 7,429.3G �7 550.00 �8 2,989.3i �� 26,590.81 LO 80.00 11 15u.00 12. 3,443.OQ 13 60.00 14 20.00 42,348.77 . $1,135,369.24 � Account Nurbe� Artaunt Due Date Check # Check Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E 15413106060 12.05 020139 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem � a E 01413107070 24.11 020139 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem *156.66 E 01413203130 127.10 020147 20-Jan-87 COMMENTS Jan Prem *127.10 * 1,135,369.24 MSSA Dues Olund iI 9 Post Office 4th Qtx Utility Postage City NIIi PC Acct Replenish P C Road Rescue F. D. Ventnre Travel Air Fare Delmont Dakota Cty St Bank 1/2 FICA FIT MEDIC„RF �� 1/2 Payroll Deductions SCCU �� City M.H. Payxoll 1/2 Net Payroll �� ' Insp Fees 86-10 Mn Dept of Hea7-th " T,�,7rjp City Share 1987 Bu�get Luu�ber Millwozk Door P. W. Govt Trng Svc Regr. L. Witt , � PROJECT BUDGET MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL 198 Cash Budget Sou ce _ City Hall Sinking Fund Arc itect's Fee - Phase I Pri ting - Plans and Specs Soil Borings Co ingency/Miscellaneous Total Pe anent Project Financing Co struction Contract Ar hitect's Fee - Phase II Co struction Materials/ oils Compaction Testing SA Charges Ph ne System Mi cellaneous Charges and ees Total Total Project Budget $70,000 1,200 2,000 6,800 $80,000 $1,250,000 17,500 5,000 6,000 20,000 10,000 $1,308,500 $1,388,500 � Adopted by the City Council on January 20, 1987 , ,�g�r`�w Page No. 235� January 6, 1987 CITY QF MENDt)TA HETGHTS DAIZOTA CQUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, January 6, 2987 Pu suant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting af th City Council, City of Mendata Heic�hts was held at 7:3Q o'clock P. . at City Hal.l, '750 South Pla2a Drive, Mendota Heights, Mi nesota. OA H OF OFFICE The Deputy City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Charles Mertensat�o and Councilmembers John Hartmann and Elizabeth Wi.tt , RO L CALL Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:35 o'clack P.M. The following members were �resent: Mayor Mertensotto, ' Councilmembers Blesener, Hartmann, and Witt. Councilmember Cummins had natified the Council that he would be late. AG NDA ADOPTI4N Councilmember Blesener moved adaption of the agenda for the meeting, including items cantained in the add-on agenda. Cauncilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ay s: 4 Na s: 0 AP ROVAL OF Cauncilmember Hartmann maved appraval of the MI TES minutes of the December 16 meeting with correctic�ns . Councilrnember Blesener seconded the motion. Ay s: 3 Na s; 0 Abs ain: 2, Mertensotto ENT CALENDAR Councilmember Witt moved approval a� the cansent calendar as submitted and recommended for approval as part of the regular agenda, alang wsth authorization for exacution of all. neces�ary documents contained therein. a. Adoption of Resolution No. 87-01, "RESOLUTTfJN ESTABLISHING Z987 CITY DEPOSITURIES OF FUNDS". b. Acknowledgement of the December 15 Planning Commission minutes. c. Acknowledgement of the December 9 Park and Recreation Cammission Minutes. � Page No. 2355 January 6, 1987 d. Acknowledgement of the December Code Enforcement report. e. Approval of the List of Pledged Securities. f. Approval of the List of Claims dated January 6, 1987, and totalling $131,210.99. g. Approval of the List of Contractor's Licenses dated January 6, 1987, and attached hereto. h. Approval of a settlement dispute for a sewer backup at 995 Caren Court. i. Approval of a sign permit for i,loyd's Foods Products,�1455 Mendota Heights Road. " Councilmember Cummins arrived at 7:43 P.M. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ACTING MAYOR Councilmember Cummins moved�that Councilmember Witt be reappointed Acting Mayor for 1987. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEALTH OFFICER Councilmember Witt moved that Dr. Thaddeus Chao, 783 Hokah Avenue, be reappointed as Health Officer for 1987. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Council had received requests from the Sun Current newspaper and the South West Review for consideration of designation as the official newspaper for 1987. Councilmember Witt noted she would not recommend the Sun Current due to the frequent lack of delivery of the paper to her home. Councilmembers Blesener and Cummins noted that they did not receive the South West Review. After a brief discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved that the West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun Current be designated as the official City newspaper for 1987, and directed Na Aye; Page No. 2356 January 6, 1987 staff to advise the Sun Current of the sporadic delivery concerns expressed by Councilmember Witt. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. 4 l, Witt ; DEPT. APPOINT- Fire Chief John Maczko was present to 'S introduce James and Kevin Perron, 676 Callahan Place, and Aaron Coates, 2361 Dodd Road, and to recommend their appointment to the Fire Department. Chief Maczko noted that there is a one year probationary period for new firefighters and briefly explained the training the men would be going through. Councilmember Witt moved the appointment of James Perron, Kevin Perron, and Aaron Coates, to the�Mendota Heig�ts Fire Department. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. �: 5 �: 0 - �IBILITY HEARING Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order )S/ROLLING WOODS for the purpose of a feasibility report hearing to consider improvements for the Ponds of Mendota Heights and the Rolling Woods Subdivision. - Engineer Klayton Eckles was present and described the properties involved in the project, noting that 43 lots and four property owners were involved. During his presen,tation, Mr. Eckles noted that the City had requested Mn/DOT approval for a drainage ditch on the east side of Dodd Road in conjunction with the improvement project, but that the approval was not granted. He noted that the staff recommendation was to use the original drainage way, in lieu of a new drainage ditch. The four property owners involved include St. Paul's United Methodist Church, to be assessed $78,000, or $15,650 per lot; the Ratchye's, 1844 Dodd Road, to be assessed $36,000 or $12,000 per lot; the Ponds of Mendota Heights (developer Michael Kurtz), to be assessed $306,000 or $13,900 per lot; and the Rolling Woods subdivision (Floyd Unruh, Donald Mager, developer), to be assessed $180,000, or $13,800 per lot. Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions or Page No. 2357 January 6, 1987 comments from the audience. Mr. Roy LaPean, 620 Callahan Place, stated that he objected to the easement running through his property, and stated that he and his neighbor, Mr. David Rischall, had many cancerns with the project and were against it. Mr. William Gydesen, a representative of St. Paul's United Methodist Church, asked a question regarding the Church's assessment and why the figure had gone up from an earlier figure he had received from City staf�. He noted that the Church is not objecting to the project at all. Mr. Flayd U�ruh, re�� estate agent for the Rolling�Woods subdzvision asked"i� credit had been given �or the water being in Dodd Road for Lot 6 af Rolling Waods. Mr. Eckles answered that yes, credit had been given for "- that lat, a� well as for Lot 3. Mr. Michael Kurtz, one of the developers for the Ponds of Mendata xeights, asked questions regarding assessments �or water far the six lot� along Warrior Drive. -_ Mrs. Jean Ratchye, 1844 Dodd Road, asked when would be an appropriate time to ask for a deferral on part o� her property. Public Works Director Jim Danielson advised her that sometime thzs fall, pri�r to �ctober 15, would be the time to ask for an ass�ssment deferral. There being no further questions ar comments, Councilmember Gummins moved ta close the public hearing at 8:24 �'clock P.M. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the mation. Ayes: 5 Naysz 0 � Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of Resolutian No. $7-02, "RESOLUTI4N �RDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIQNS FOR SANITARY SEWER�, WATER, � ST�RM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTTON TO SERVE THE PONDS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND ROLLING WOODS AND ADJACENT AREAS �IMPROVEMENT NO. $6, PROJECT NO. 9)", subject to a curve on Wesley Lane being ins�alled a� shown on the �inal plat, investigation af aptions for installing sanitary sewer along Callahan Road right-of- way, and laoking into a looped wa�ermain, rather than Zong water servzces for the six A Na DIS � Page No. 2358 January 6, 1987 2ots along Warrior Dr.ive. Councilmember Cummins secondeci the motion. MEETSNG Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, the SION City's representative to the Metropolitan Aircra�t Sound Abatement Council, was present to seek Counci2 direction regarding a January 27 MASAC meeting. The January 2� meeting was for the purpose o� resolving a carridar dispute betwean Eagan and Mendota Heights. � After a Iengthy discussion, Counezlmembar Witt sugges�ed that this item be removed �rom the January 27 MASAC agenda and that Eagan and Mendota.Height� try to came to an agreement prior �.�o�any MASAC meeting. Mr. Friel agreed that there should be an�equitable distribution of air tra�fic over the corridor as a way of resolving the dispute. Mr. Joseph Maher, who lives north of Mendota Elementary School, camplained about the excess air traffic noise over hi� home and asked where the boundaries of the flight corridor were . -_ Councilmember Cummins maved to authorize sta�f to request MASAC to remove this item frozn their January 27 meeting and to postpone any discussian until their March meeti.ng, while the ci�ies of Eagan and Mendota Heights try to resolve the issue before March. Council.member Blesener seconded the motion. 5 0 ' Mayar Mertensotto suggested th.at staff contact Eagan official� ta advise them oi' the requested postponement and to set up a pracedure to resolve the issue. NO. 8b-38, Mr. and Mr�. John George, 1834 Dodd Road, were E, LOT SPLTT present to request approval o� a lot division for Lot 25, Willaw Spring� Addition. They � advised the Council that they were aware of the required $6Q0 park contributian and stated that they pl.anrred ta canstruct their anew hame behind their present home on Dodd Road. Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of Resolution No, 87-Q3, "RESQLUTION APPROVSNG TFiE LOT DI�IISION QF LOT 25, WILLOW SFRINGS ADDITION", approving the lot division as Page No . 2 3 59- January 6, 1987 requested. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 DEER TRAIL HILLS Councilmember Hartmann noted that he would FINAL PLAT & PLANS abstain from voting on this matter, as he had & SPECS. a conflict of interest in this case. The Council briefly reviewed the final plat for Deer Trail Hills and asked if a developer's agreement had been signed, and if a park contribution is required for this plat. Developer Lawrence Shaughnessy stated that he would sign a developer's agreement when it was available and that no park contribution is required, since the park contribution matter had been taken care of some years earlier. Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-04, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT", approving the final plat for Deer Trail �iills . Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 - Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Hartmann Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No. 87-05, "RESOLUTION APPROVING � FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE DEER TRAIL HILLS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT NO. 10)". Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstain: 1, Hartmann MN/DOT AGENCY Public Works Director Jim Danielson advised AGREEMENT the Council that staff recommended that the City enter into an agreement with Mn/DOT which would authorize the State to act as its agent in accepting Federal Aid on behalf of the City for road and bridge construction. Councilmember Hartmann moved the adoption of Resolution No. 87-06, "MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AID FORM NO. III", � authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the Ac�ency Agreement with Mn/DOT on behalf of the City. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No . 2360 January 6, 1987 'S The Council reviewed a propased vT developer agreement cancerning the Yorkton Centre Pointe 5outh Knalls 2nd Additian areas. Ay�s: 5 Na s: 0 �:`Iil�;i�.i�`i� Aye�: 5 Nav . � LIGHTING builder - constructian in and Evergreen Councilmember Cummins maved approval of the deve3.opers agreements for both area�. Mayor Mertensotta felt that the agreements shauld be e�anded so that the developers understand that no accupancy permit will be issued until the utilities are instaiied, and the developer agrees that it is his responsibility to notify future occupants of this requirement. Councilmember Cummins accepted the friendly amendment. City Attorney Tom Hart suggested adding a clausa stating that the develaper/builder themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to this agreement and ta the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants this agreement. m Councilmember Cummins accepted this friendly amendment also. Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion ta cover both agreements. Staff recammended the purchase of a Tora groundmaster snawblawer and mawer for the Public Works Department. Public Works Director Danielson noted that thi� same purchase cost $4,000 more the previou� year. Councilmember Blesener,maved approval of the purchase o� a Toro Groundmaster mower and snowblower from Langula Hardware �or $10,004. Councilmember Witt secanded the matian. The Cauncil. brzefly discussed a program for street lighting in the business park area. Page No . 2361 January 6, 1987 Public Works Director Danielson noted that the creation of a Special Taxing District would help pay for the installation of the lights. After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved the adoption of Resolution of Resolution No. 87-07, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING OF BUSINESS PARKS". Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CITY SLOGANS The Council reviewed several City slogans and decided to table action on them until the March meeting. UPDATE ON Mayor Mertensotto noted that Planning COMMISSION Commissioner Stuart Henning was interested in APPOINTMENTS being reappointed, but that Commissioner John ' Frank would not be seeking reappointment. He also noted that Park Commissioner Mary Jeanne Schneeman is not interested in serving another � term, and that Park Chairman Jim Stein is willing to serve until the park bond referendum is settled. He noted that for the present time, two appointments would need to be made €or City commissions, one for the Planning Commission and one for the Park Commission. He asked if staff or the Council ' was aware of any other residents interested in serving on either Commission., Mr. Charles Bangesser, a recent resident in the Copperfield area, was in the audience and expressed an interest in serving on the Planning Commission. Mayor Mertensotto suggested he send a letter of interest to the City for consideration. MISCELLANEOUS The Council acknowledged receipt of a report from Public Works Director Danielson relative to a Corps of Engineers permit not being needed in conjunction with construction of a , new city hall on TH 110 and Lexington. ARCHITECTS CONTRACT The Council reviewed a proposed architects ' contract from Lindberg Pierce for construction of a new city hall. Mayor Mertensotto � • expressed a preference for writing the contract with a percentage fee, rather than a fixed flat fee. Staff was directed to come back on January 20 Page Na. 2362 , January 6, 2.987 with an estimated project development cost for constructian af a new city hall. �CELLANEOUS Councilmember Hartmann commen�ed on the hole at the end of Miriam and noted that it was now passable. He also questianed the zoning ordinance in relation to the garage being constructed on Delaware and Marie. Councilmember Witt asked abaut increased sewer costs far this year. Mayor Mertenso�to asked ta see copies of the monthly billings from any outside billings, as well as seeing a copy of the bil.lings from the attarney's and p3.anner's affice. � Cauncilmember Blesener�suggested conducting a joint meeting�with the Planning Commission to advise them what the Cauncil is seeking from " them regarding planning matters. Staff was directed ta advi�e the Planning Commission that a joint meeting would be requested for 7:t30 P.M. on February 24, the Planning Commissian's regular meeting night. There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Hartmann maved that the•meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Witt seconded the motion. : 5 . 0 TZME OF ADJOURN,MENT: 9:52 o'clock P.M. Mary Ann DeLaRosa Deputy Clerk F� Cha les E. Mav r , LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPRDVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 6, 1987 Ashpaltic/Concrete Pavinq License: Daily and Son Blacktopping, Inc. Excavatinq License: Carl Bolander and Sons Company Commercial Utilities, Inc. Hiltner Plumbing and Heating Kamish and Sons, Inc. Scherff, Inc. , - . T.A. Schmidt and 5ons Excavating, Inc. Turf, Inc. _ , Sun Excavating, Inc. Turner Excavating, Inc. Weierke Trenching and Excavating, Inc. Fence Installation License: Dakota Fence of Minnesata, Inc. Gas Pi in License: Apollo Heating and Ventilating Corporation A. Binder and Son, Inc. Controlled Air Dakota Plumbing and Heating, Inc. J.K. Heating Company Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Red Rock Heating and Sheet Metal, Inc. Riccar Heating Ron's Mechanical Rause Mechanical, Inc. Snelling Mechanical, Inc. l Thermex Corporation General Contractor's License: Hefort Roofing, Inc. Bream Builders, Inc Carlson Automatic Fire Protection Company Dakota Fire Suppression, Inc. Eagan Construction Company, Inc. Fey's Construction, Inc. Fireside Corner, Inc. Homemaster Builders, Inc. General Contractor�s L-ic. Cont. Jos. E. Johnson and Son Ken's Construction D. J. Kranz Company, Inc. Lovering Associates, Inc. Ma�or/Wood Construction Norcon Company Olympic Pools, Inc. Sunshine Construction Company T i 1 sen Homes, I nc. Twin City Exteriors Co., Inc. Western States Fire Protection Zimmerman Homes � Charles Zwinger, Inc. Specialized Heatinq and Air Conditioninq Lic.: Air Comfort, Inc. Apollo Heatring � Ventilating Corp. A. Binder and Son, Inc. Hoehm Heating Controlled Air Dependable Heating and Air Cond. Dronen's Heating and Air Cond. Harris Mechanical Cantracting Co. Metropolitan Mechanical Cant. Inc. J. K. Heat ing Company Red Rock Heating and Sheet Metal Ron's Mechanical, Inc. Snelling Mechanical, Inc. Riccar Heating Rouse Mechanical, Inc. Fred Vogt and Company Ray N. Welter Heating Company Masonrv License: Andretta Brothers, Concrete � Mas Arcade Concrete Construction Concrete Concepts, Inc. John Erikson Construction Manor Concrete Construction Gresser, Inc. Johnny Masonry, Inc. Rosemount Cement, Inc. Trapp Concrete and Masonry Wayne Concrete . License• Berg Dr�ywall, Inc. Housley� Construction, Inc. glqn E_r�",ectinct License: Signs, Inc. � � , . _ , . . --- _. _ GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESfJTA Minutes of the Special Meeting Held Tuesday, January 13, 1987 Pu suant to due call th City Council and 7: 0 o'clock P.M. at He qht�, Minnesota. Page No. 2363 �anuary 13, 1987 and notice thereof, the special meeting of Park and Recreatian Commission was held at Gity Hal1, '750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Th meeting was called to order by Mayor Mertensotta at 7.05 F.M. Th �ollowing members were present: Mayor M�rtensatto, Co ncilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmartn and Witt. Also present fr m tha Parks Commis�ion were Marsha Knittig, Carol Damberg, Ro ert Leffert, and Robert Doffing. P3.anning Commissioners pr sent included Jerry Morson, Doroth� McMonZgal, Bill Burke, Ul an Duggan. City staff m�mbers present included Treasurer Larry Sh ughne�sy,.Administrator Kevin Frazell, Public Works Director Ji Danielson, and Barton-Aschman cansultant Barry Warner. �� DI CUSSION OF AT LETIC Minutes of the December 9, 1986 Park and Recreation Commission meeting were ap�roved by the Commission members as �reviouslv submitted. Mr. Barry Warner indicated that the xenry Sibley site had ranked highest on their survey af potential facility sites, mainly because the praperty already exists and is available at minimal or no cast. He then decribed the proposed development pragram, which includes twa so�'tba11 fields, a junior-high size baseball field and soccer field, a11 lighted, then a second unlighted soccer field, corrections to existing soccer fields south of the high schoal, lighting of existing tennis courts, and construction of a comiort station and storage building. Mr. Warner said the cast of this development, including design and contingencies, is estimated at $Zr300�792. He then went over aspects of the mema describing the discus�ians between the schaol district and City of Mendota Heights staff, including scheduling camp�atibility, coordination, znaintenance, contral by a jaint committee, and liability. Mr. Warner's memo included an estimate that the existing schoo2 property and facilities already in place have a value of approximately $660,000. He then went over an attachment showing the time needed ta complete construc�ion of a useable field, Page No . 2 3 6,4 Jan�aary 13, 198'7 including th.e referendum vote, design detail, bidding, property acquisition, construction, and finally, turf preparation. Councilmember Blesener �aid that she felt there was a need to add a playgraund area for small children, since famil.ies �requently bring sma13 childre�i whan attending athletic events. Parks Gommissioner Bob Leffert said that the Commission had attempted to }ceep the proposed bond program at a minimum ta meet the community's current needs. City Admini�trator Kevin Frazell discu�sed the implicatians af cost sharing between the City and the schoal district, He said that officials from both sides had agreed that the benefit was prabably about a 50-50 split, except that the la.ghting waul.d be fully to the benefit of the City only, since the �chool district doas not schedule athletic events after dark. He said that when the schaol district is given credit for the praperty and facilities in place it wi11 be bringing to the agreement, most of the million dollars of new con�tructian cost wauld fall to the City. Thare was then some general discussion about whether the school district should be given fu1.l credit for the sautherly soccer fields, which already exist and are in use by schaol district and community groups. Mayar Mertensatto said that he feit the need to tie down th� is�ue af awnership and control, and that the City wauld not want to leave itself at the mercy o�' the school district in the future. Mr. Warner indicated that he thought the cost estimates provided, when coupled with a 100 contingency allowance, were su�ficiently accurate for the purposes of a bond referendum. BIKEJPEDES- Cansultant Warner indicated that the propased trail TRIAN TRAIL plan will provide particular points o� origin and PLAN destination, and will 2ink to trail systems in surrounding communi.ties. He said that the cost �reparted in his memos anticipate some out�ide agency funding other than Cit� funding only, but warned that it did not seem likely that the City could caunt an grants for Dakota County, �ince they are no longer that committed to bike trail.s. However, he said that 5tate Highway Department funds mi.ght be available for roads eii.gible for Municipal State Aid and County State Aid �undi.ng. Tha cost of the bike trail s�stem varies from $500,000 ta $700,000, depending upan assumptians about outside funding. He also said �hat the�e NEIi TAX Page No. 2365 January 13, 1987 cost estimates were about a year old now, and should probably be increased by about 5%. There was some discussion among those present about which numbers should be used for the purposes of a bond issue. City Administrator Frazell indicated that it would be possible to go to the voters` seeking authorization for the total amount, but as the trails are developed, and if and when outside funding becomes available, the City would simply choose not to issue the full allocation of bonds. Mayor Mertensotto said that he thought we should try to go with off-road trails as much as possible for safety reasons. �HBORHOOD Barry Warner went through his memo of June 13, ; IMPROVE- 1986, which detailed a minor amount of improvements 'S to existing neighborhood parks. He said that with an 8% design fee, the City should probably - anticipate about $105,000 for these improvements. There was discussion about the need to develop parks in the south east area of the City, on land to be dedicated by Tandem Corporation in connection with their residential developments. However, it wa generally decided not to include money for that development in the bond issue, but to use existing and receivable funds in the Park Improvement Fund. Commissioner Bob Leffert said that the proposed park development plan was meeting basic needs as determined by the survey done by the Commission a couple of years earlier. Commissioner poffing added that the highest priority of citizens responding to that survey was trails and scenic nature opportunities. L COST OF City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy went over his memo ISSUE & outlining the tax implications of various sizes of CONSEQ- bond issues and the operating costs connected with ES maintaininc� an expanded park system. A copy of that memo is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. He said that debt service for the existinc� bond issue expires in 1992, and it would be possible to stagger the new bond issue �o lessen the initial impact on homeowners and other property taxpayers. Barry Warner said that the total bond issue needed to complete the athletic complex, trails plan, and neighborhood park improvements would range from $1,605,000 to $1,860,000, depending on assumptions about outside assistance for the bike trail plan. Page No. 2366 January 13, I987 Mr. Shaughnessy said that there wauld probably alsa be about $20,000 in bond issuance costs. CONSULTANT Barry Warner indicated that Barton-Aschman could do ROLE IN BOND such things as prepare community information REFERENDUM materials and put tagether a slide shaw. Hawever, PROMOTION everyone agreed that it was important that cammunity people do the actual �romoting o� the bond issue. He said that a basxc decision needed to be made an the philo�ophy o� marketing a bond issue, i.e., do you market to special groups, provide very little information, etc. Mayor Mertensotto responded that he felt the issues should be openly marketed to the entire community. Upon survey by Mayor Mertensotto, there was a consensus of the Council, Parks Commissian�rs and Planning Commissioners that the City shauld proceed to develop a bond referendum in the amount of $1,860,000. A target date far the referendum is Tuesday, April 21, meaning tha� th� Council would have to call for the re�erendurn at its second meeting in February. It was further agread that the Parks Commission would take the matter up at a meeting in the near future, and send a resolution to the City Council requesting them to set a ref erendum . Consultant Barry Warner was asked to get a proposal back to the City for their assistance in preparing material.s for marketing the bond issue. There was also agreement that the Council and Parks Commission would need to work together to develop a mark.etir�g strategy ior how best to selZ the propasal. � ADJaURN There being na further business to come before the Council, the meeting wa� adjourned at 9:34 P.M. �. Kevin Frazell f C�t�r Aciminlstrator ATTEST: C ar es Mer en�a o, Mayor CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO JANlJARY , 19 8 7 '" TO: May r, City Council, City Administrator & Park Commission FROM: L rry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SUBJECT: Future Tax Estimates Att� expected Two 1. 2. LES: atta .. z hed is a tabulation of future tax estimates which could be or the approval of a Park Bond issue. hanges from our tabulation of last year have affected the figures. aluation growth has been and is expected to be at a higher leval ver the next two to three years. he interest rate used in the calculations has been reduced from 1/2% to'6 3/4% by virtue of improvement in the bond market and ur improved credit rating. � NOTE: The Parks Fund balance currently stands at $230,.160, and there are $91,000 of receivables from approved plats. �t , , , 4 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO PARK BOND PROJECTIONS Bond Issue size, @ 6 3 40 - - ^ YEAR EST. TAX � $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000 86/87 99,910,000 87/88 105,000,000 88/89 112,000,000 89/90 120,000,000 * 92,567 90/91 125,000,000 Est. Mill Rate 1989/90 Existing Park Debt. (92) Est. Operating Exp. (50,000) Future Mill Rate Existing Debt End in 1992 .77 .43 .42 1.62 138,850 1.16 .43 .42 2.01 TAX EFFECT, $1,000,000 Issue Est. Sale Price $80,000 $110,000 $125,000 $150,000 Ass. Mkt Value 64,000 88,000 100,000 120,000 Tax Assd Value 11,520 18,720 22,320 28,320 $ Debt Service $ 8.87 $ Opr. $ 4.84 Total $ 13.71 1986 Tax Net $489 City Share of 1986 Levy, approx. 17%: $83.13 $ 14.41 7.86 22.27 $1134 $192.78 $17.19 9.37 �26.56 $1487 $21.81 11.89 33.70 $2075 161,991 1.35 .43 .42 2.20 $175,000 $200,000 140,000 160,000 34,320 40,320 $26.43 $31.05 14.41 16.93 , 40.84 47.98 $2663 $3251 $252.79 $467.50 $452.71 $552.67 * Annual debt service payment based on size of bond issue. U . .�. 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TRESURER'S REPORT, DECEMBER, 1986 A COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account Savings Account Savings Cert. 3-26-87 @ 5.4% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. KEE STATE BANK C.D. due 2-4-87 @ 5.25% Savings Cert. 3-87 @ 5.6'% BALANCE $12,805.76 423.18 25,000.00 $38,228.94 200,000.00 125,000.00 $425,000.00 '13,952.59 $438,952.59 Collateral - Bonds 1,500,000.00 Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 . TREASURY BILLS Due 3-5-87 $350,000 Dk. Co. 340,834.28 1-29-8'7 950,000 938,914.38 5-14-87 800,000 775,596.44 3-19-87 350,000 345,485.00 $2,400,830.10 " T, SECURITIES FUND, 10.7% 1,200,000.00 �p, 200,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $4,278,011.63 , COLLATERAL 325,000.00 1,600,000.00 �iENDOTA HEIGHTS FiRE DEPARTMENT �fONTHLY REYORT Fir.e alls No. �12 thru �� Number of Calls �� Month of December , 19'$ 6 FIRE LARMS DISPATCHED N0. STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC. TOTAL5 TO DATE TYPE Comme cial Residelntial Vehicle Fires Contra t Fires (All) Ve cidents edica s cue (no fire) Grass, Brush & No VaZue False larm Criminai Fa2se " Commercial False " Residential Goad I tent Calls Hazard us Situation T4 AL CALLS LOCATI N OF FIRE ALARMS Mendot Heights 10 Mendota 2 Sunfish Lake 2 Lilydal � Other _�_ _0� -0- 2.500..450 -0- -0- -0- 5,795 --0- 61,185 i i.2oo --o- --0- 31,oao i � —o— � —o— � —o— S ..._- MONTHLY LOSS TOTA.LS MEN. HTS All Fires, all areas $ I.00p$ l,5gg,4gp� Men. HCs Only Struct/Contents 1�506;21�5 Men. Hts Only Miscellaneous 61,185 1 Men. Iits Total Loss to Date $ 1,5b7,43fl 2 3. I 24 To Date 169 I4 15 25 2 BILLING F4R SERVICES Agency This Month MnjDOT Mi.lw. RR Last Yr. CNR RR O�hers: 201 6 11. 7 5 , TQ AL . WORK PE FORMED Hours To Date LasC Yr. Fire Ca ls 1g2 41$7 -• 93 g1 ?�feeting �4_ _S3�Z_ . ��'� Drills �� [� �,5g Weekly lean-up 2. , 7�9 54"3 S�ecial Training 42 18�_ b24 Adminis rative 35: _ 51�__ 537 Fire Ma shal S�_S 659.� TOTA S --y-g-,-�...-5 �,.:Z��S 6 Z42_.�� ._ - TOTALS To Date FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME F4R MQNTH: Inspections 17.5 � InvestigaCions 19.5 Reinspectian Meetings Dr iI1 s %fira ining Administra�ion I5.5 T4TAL 52,5 Remarks: See other side for. synopsis. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 6, 1987 SYNOPSIS OF MONTHLY FIRE CALLS The fire department responded to 14 calls during the month of December. Only one of the fire calls resulted in any fire damage. This occurred on Wednesday, December 24, at 9:30 in the evening. The department was dispatched to a structure fire at 1337 Second Street, in Mendota. Flames were reported visible from the roof. The first truck at the scene quickly extinguished the fire and damage estimates were set at $1,000. An investigation was conducted and probable cause was a faulty electrical outlet. No injuries were reported. SYNOPSIS OF MONTHLY TRAINING Our drill for the month was spent critiquing the Country Club Warehouse fire. A lot of good things came out of the critique. On Monday, December 8, a special drill was held to critique the Country Club Warehouse fire. In attendance at this drill were firefighters and officers from the Eagan and Inver Grove Heights Fire departments. Again, this was a true learning experience for all three departments, since some problems in logistics, radio communications and other things that occurred on such a major incident will help all three departments in plannin� should a major incident again occur in either of the three cities. JPM:madlr r . �:��$2E t3EF�`f'icRT#''1E�#T ?"1�}�iT�#C'f '!+�(l�$'i 'f��2Et`3�P"'�f�rT+ICE..,FQR,#�E�Ei�1$EiZ 1.�#£� .........:........................:............. ..... � � .................. ..�� ................. ............. ..........,.............. ............... ....................... . .... .: : : :: : ........... ......................................... ..... :;......................;.............� ..a..............................:a....................:.,............. .............:............... : : � : ��ri�� ts� �"�U�� : ��f ; ��.. • ��r�� i.�i��i:�"t�!'��.'�': �'i�� :'��:��'��:i��.•��i�:�;Q�'��i�i� : ............ .................rr..........�............ .....0............x...........�...................:.............................�J:...........�........J...........................6.............................. . .. t � :�..C�LLS �C,�LLS�ATTEiiDED€: ifP : DRILL.. : ;1TG € ...P'1TG... .DRILL. .,AC7'.... ..�CT,... ........s� ....................................:� ..................>...................>..............................,...........�........;.............^....... . ...,........^.... .......^...... ............. ......... •�'�tIP'! - E;�sR T�1 �ATE :'-...��'i'D :�T�'€3..;. TiiiS . :: : £ ...:... ...�.. • _ ..::.. ........^.^ ................ .....,. ..............:................. , ............................�:.........�........;. ...;.......�..,...:.....,......�--- ......... ............�......... .......�.......... �....... ..' .........................:. �c5 €? MUIVTH: YE�� YEAit :•`HOURS: HOl1RS :HE�S.� HOUR� : NQURS HOURS HOUR�.,...N��S ....:a ......................o..................s...........,..................;q....................;.................,..........;...............�...,....................;......................,.�........................;.................,.. .. .............................. ..qS. .... ».. ...» »....1°. ..... .....4.. ........ ......».a.. ..� . ..... .»t_ .»....a.. .... . ` .... .......»..,......_.a.. ..«»..».....:»..p.. ..i. r. �HIEFJohn Mac, �o ..�_ ..11_,. ..��:� .... ... .`� ... .........� ....... . ..;. ..... ..... ...... .......� .................... ................ CTi� t1 ( .. {, .:0 ........ .......�... ... ...4...... ..«.... .:0... .. .� ..�. ...,.}.. ..... .........�..t.. N�J t . �ji f 1 Lt'•j .C+S. ,.� . .. �•�. ...... � � M...... ......�"..........4............�...........b.....`..». ....... �.........4......,...`..»»... .....»........»....5......» .............o,........... ......» ............................ ..4:, ................. ............. »-o » _ :.y...... ... ..;.. ..... ..� �. .... .�o.. ... ... j .... ..........7. ....... ...�. ...o.. ..... ..�. .». ...., ..L .......,b.............,.._... .............,.... .....».,. ................................................ ........... . ................o.. .... . .. G;�P�. Kieth Stei n :: 1 1 : 152 : r � �a :: . . ` . ...,... . ` . ... ................... ..... ..,.. ................... .......,............�... .......................................... .....o:.......................:...................:..........................»..i:..............,.....e...»...»...............»o...... ».... i.» »b,.. -. ........ : 1 1 i � �'�";� ' : 2 : 2 s ; ...:... ..a... P�ul Ure�lsn........ .;q...... � ......., ... ....... ......... ......... ... .:d.......:�...... ...................... ...�....>...............,.... .......�..........;....._........_... .................. .........., t''lli�:� rt��lft8tl ..�. ..+�• .... �'� � .... '` .................3,........ .........:;... �- .....................;................,... ........,............;......................;............ .... ...;:... ,.� . ..7 . ;,.. . ...: .. _ . • . G�7rd+a Skier+ren ._..� ..... .� �� .... 5�� .... .:-0..... ... ....... ....... . ...o ..................... ..... .......4............,,._.... .................. .......... �Ed..ti . .,i � n ................ .;�....... ..��.. ..;.. . j .1. J..,.d.. ..� i� �. - ....... �' ....... . �� . ................... .......�.. .... ................... ................... .s............. �dt � ... ... ..... ......:.:. ... .....a.. � ..4....... ..�. F...�.,,. .�............ ..>:........�..... ..�•��. . .�.� }. ..�'... ....... � ....... . '' ...; .......................:........................;........................:.,......................;............. .i . r: i1i�h ... ..... ..... ...:... ... . ...... . ..... .... :�.. ... ... ... •` : : P�#?r'�'i?lard :. ..�...... ..'��. .�1 �4 .... `` ... � ... � ....... � ....... � � .....................;....... � ..... .....................�.......................;............. . ...... ..p:• .... ... .... . ..... ... ..a:... ..L.. ... ..i ................:... ..�. :... : : ��tl��dt'r��fi... ..�...... .....�.�..?.., ......�,�:'�...... :;.......W ...... .........�.......... ...�.....;.................... ........£..........}............»........ .................. .......... ..................................... :.;.. ............. ..;.. , ..... ..... ..# . .... ..� . ......a�. ... _ .....o......... .j� . .........o... .'� . ..... ..�.. ........+.........:` . ..... .....................s.�.....................o......,..... i:r``i�'T. �Jf��'�� 1'�i�sks�. ...�. ..1 � 5. ...�.�,..� �� ..,. .............. ....... ....... . ...;......................,:........................�,........................;........................:............ . .. ........... : "y....... ..... ..j.. . ,.i.. ..... ........ :.y... ..^. .:^ . ^ : : �Eilt�Ci�t }let' ..�. ..�.�.. '�'��:;' .... ............... ....... t .........;.. z . ................... ...... � ..... .....................?..................,.. .. , .. }.�.iry......�: ...... 4 ...... ......�..... .�.�G. ......57?� �� . . �' . ................... ........�.,........�........................;........................;............ iI�.i��s J, �{��3�,�.... �;.y...... ..... . ... .. ..... _..... ... A� ... .. ... .......»............ . ..y.. , ._�. .:ry,.. •�• . • :it£5t� G3t'��Ilfl � .... . �� .....+�ll:i, .....bE. .... �f .... ....................... . t . ................... ..... ..... ........,............;�.......................;........... ...�f.�ti . ................ ..�;. .... ..� .-z � , .� � � . ...``...,.• ...... ....... . jf . ..... ..... ..... i .... .................. ..........,....... .......... �3fr�....,Y��............ ,ca...... .....:?.. ..a• . ... ....... ... .:q..... ..`.. ... . _ .`» ..�. �ih�Or(}�'i LfJti'r� ...��... ..1..��. "�,'?�'Q ... .....n ...... ..........�:.......... ..«..'G... ........ ........ ................... ................... � : �w, • .............. ............. ..........t.:Y:... . � ..y.. ..�.. ..p.......................y........... ........ .......................... ..4:. .. . ... . ..� .:y...... .... i ..j..,... �.t..�... ... .��s«... ... ........�t« ....... .......... ..«..-�...... ........r.�.....«...j......«.........._. .......,.......... •.•......� ��+F'T.�Jeff �#enh9 QE i� � �`t .... .�� r�� .... �. ... '� ... � ....... t" .........b... .....................o..................... .........»...._....o.......................b.... ..a;. .... . .. ..S}.. ..b.. .+' . ;... . .»i... : c i��r�,�..tl�s�ck��r. .......�. �:� � � ..... �'� ° ... :;..... � .N ...... .� ....... . ..:.............__.... ..... .......�.. �................ .................. ......... .» .......».„ .:y.. ... . �. ....»ry.. . 1 U li ....�.. .��. ..�f`..• ...... €: ........ ,. � . ................... ........ � ...... ................... ,....................�........,.. '9�!� ,t�l�:l.�,41't ..... ..fi:. .... .... . .... . .... ... ......M:. ... .... .. .. ..;.. .. ,G�r� C?�rk:s ..�. .;�;� ....�.�� ....::;..... � ... ....... �' ...... . � ..3 ..................... .....................�.................... .................. ......... 4. _........ .. »o.......i :`. . ..p....� ;`� ..5.. ..�� . - •7 ...... . .l` . ................... ..... ..... .........,...........y................,.....fi.......,... �eurq�,�3oa��..�!r: ..:� .... '.. .... . ... .... ........ .... ... � ......�.......... ... . ... T��1 y ��u ni k ..� . ..� �,. ...� t o. ... .... ..' ....... ....... .L. ....... . .� . ........._....... .....,. �........ .................. .................. ......... {..�,.}.� . � . .....,... :�.. ... ..� ..z�... .,..s.. . � 5.� ...;.. ......� S ,�. :;,. � ....... ... � ... ................... :... ..;... ... :.. ...�........... 3v1� ��, .1 �+3.�+.. �� .... .... ..... ...,..p� . .................q......... ..y........................�........................q......................-. Lprou P��c��c��,......... ..i�. .:110.. ......`��m....... .............. ..........'......... ............;.................... ................... .................. .................. ......... ,, . .. . • . . . � : . . . :. ...:... ....... . ... ... ..:.... ...,... .... . ......................................_.......::,....._.................;..... ..4... ....�... . . . � • .. ... ..o;. ..... ..... ..� . .... _ .... ... ......b......... _ .........'s.. ..�.. .......t ........ ........�. .... .....................b......................'s........... �C�PT.��Y.er��t�lohck� ..�. ..1�6 .. .�'a.� ... .............. .........�......... . ...>.................... .....................;..................... .................. ....... 4.. .. ..5; f . ... :.;.. .... .. }. .... .:}.. ..�.� . ....y.. . ..c�. �J a i:y.. ...............».... .. �... ....,..........,.....�..........,.............;.................._., .. ;........................::. ........ T��ii� �S�it��#.t�1 .. .... .. . .... ... ......�� ................ . ..:,... �Turn i�l��nd ............. ... .,�. ..b�• ..... �� .... :.;...... ... ....... ....... . ...a..................... ..,.. � .......a..................... .................. ........ .. . .... ......... .:; ...... ... .....4.. ..;.. ...��.�-... .+; ... '�}' . .......... ..... •~ ..... .................. ;... .... ........ �17�3(i �.��13�'iCQ....... ` .....�•�.... �.�r� .... �; r� .... ... `= ....fi..........� ....... .:- ....... ...�... .L .i .......................r,. ,J�. �......... ..¢:. .�. ..1..1.�. ..J.1 �ry� .•� ..... .........L ....... ...`.....e........................e..........�.........�........................:...............,........E....,..... rn�(:iib�rg, .... ..... ... .... ..............:;.......... .... , : J. ..... . .......... . '{ ,��7� :; ': �.. .......�.. _ � � '. b .......................�..,........ �rr�i�: L�t't�� .......� .... .� � .... ..�.......;;..... ... ....... .........;.....�,. .....................�.......:.�....... ................... ..�nd;..i�l�r�a�rr��ra� .�. .�.J. .,:,7.,� ... ... �t•... ........� ....... . ...3 ..............._......:....................,...�.......................:........................:......,.... .. ... ....�:... . ........ F' ' � ` ..... ... ..... . . ............� ..............�.......... ....�.j.......................?...................j.. :... ,.::J.. , n . . • ;: .. .... ... ....4... ... .. ... . . ... :... .. � . . : . . �� ., � : �+� . Er� � �chmidt `� 1 � � 1 �., • r, - •. � � � ' ..........._..... � � � ' � .. : ._ , � : .............a......:-......;... ...a........................,........................i.......................�.......... .......»...........» ..................... .....t:......................»....»...«........ �.........�.....t1..........3:«..................b...»......... 1 ........................«........... .�.�.. ...... ............... :.}.. . .,�. .. .......^ . ..... ..^ � ..9.........C. ..... ... ..�.�. ......�5.. .................. .................. .......� .. ... . ..............�...................n........,... ... . . .... ...:... . .... ...�... . . . . ... • ' : : '•` TQT(�L �,TTEl�aDEG� �: �.l : �� r : � t ....... .......................................... ....;:.................................... .....................................�:......,.............�...........................;.............,.;........................�. ..... ... ... ................... ................... i�T�L MAt� NO!!k� �2 � 5� . . : �-t - . : . ;. ..;.. ..;... � �.�. �. `� � ..a.. .. . ............. ....... .......................... ....:.y......................y..................v...........,.............r,...;.}....................t.w.............................., ...n......... ......,... ...... .......... ................... .. ........ .. .» ..................... .......... ..� �. ..y:.. .................o.. ..4�....�. ..4.. ......... ............«.......q..................... .....................4.. ....................o......... ..��ii:�'M��' ��,.a��.r��cx�r:�:: ��T t fr,,�' : ............a.................... .....................;.................... .................. r., ..�. ..�.. . . �� . ................,k��:�h�;�� °................ ;��:��: ....... ................... ................... ................... :.................. ......., ........... .. ............... ....:_....... , . �tE. R JN�r t�1�N €: 5. : .. ............... .. ........ . .. . ..q�. .... ... ............. ... .... ..¢... ..4.. �}�E. i'�lEial��.3t�l.. ..1,:,.�� .....1 �.��. .. .............. ...� �:�� . ............>.............._..... ................... ......,........... .................. ....... _ ..... .. ..,... ... . .......................................... .... :;...................... i...................;.. • . . » . .. ...:q ... ...'.,. . ..... . . . .. ...:... : �1 �4 � ,� ...�... . • ..y . . : •... ...:.« "" i'1rE ;'� F0�'�EAR :: �i�r.�4 € 4�.�3 . 4�.�1 0 ENGINEER'S PROJECT REP4RT JP►NUARY � 0, 19 8 7 . Imp. 79-�, North End Streets CRIPTION: Rehabilitation of Czty Streets z CU NT STATUS: 80% Complete, first lift of paving complete. Second lift ta be completad next year, ES IMATED CaST: Contract & Overhead = 420,442 + I68�I77 =$.588�629 : Cold weather prevents any further work. . Imp. 84-4, '�orkton Centre Pointe South Subdivision CRIPTION: Sewers, Water,, Streets to serve 11 lots in business park. . C NT STATUS: Grading operations are nearly complete, Utility - work is about 80% complete, Weather prevents further work. Project to be completed beiore July 1987 ES IMATED COST: Feasibility: $2,235,100 Cantract & Overhead = 817,558 + 327,024 = $1.,244,581 e The remaining underground utility work and all the streat constructian will be completed before July of �his year. CT: Imp. 86-7, Copperfield Phase II ION: Sewers, Water, Streets to serve 53 new single family lats. � STATUS: Developer has completed most of the grading, wil1. begin underground utility work early next Spring EST�IMATED COST: Feasibility: $687,000 : Project is to be completed by the Developer rather than the City. : Imp. 86-10, Deer Trail Hills DES�RIPTION: Sewers, Water, Streets to serve 14 new Iats West of Evergreen Knolls. CUR�2ENT STATUS: Plans and Specs are camplet�. Project is out for w � bid» Canstruction wi11 begin This spring. TED COST: Fsasibility Estimate $216,858 . Developer is currently warking to finish the grading. � ; PROJECT: Imp. 82-7, Mendota Heights Raad Lift Statian (Bisanz} _ DESCRIPTION: Sewer & Water to serve th� I�S buildzng & surraunding areas. CURRENT STATUS: Construction 100% camplete, compiling assessm�nts, ESTZMATED COST: Cantract & Overhead = 89,4�1.00 + 35,629 =$124,?00 REMARKS: IOS Building is occupied. Lift statian is in operation PRQJECT: Imp. 85-4, Copperfield Phase I DESCRIPTION: Sewers, Water, Streets to serve 55 new single family Iats. CUF:RENT STA2'US: Constructian 95a complete, the Side-walk will be constructed next spring. Assessment RoI1 has been - completed & adopted. ESTIMATED COST: Total Aatual Cost: $4?1,800 REME�2KS: Tatal Per Lot Assessment: $8,580.85 PRQJECT: Smp. 86-2, Wesley Lane, United Methodist Church DESCRIPTION: 5ewers, Water, Streets ta serve the church and 14 �uture single family lots. _ CUF:RENT STATUS: Constructian is 100� complete. ESTIMATED C�ST: Total Praject cost = 84,945 + overhead. REMARKS: Target date a� church complete in mid-December. Unruh proposes development to the north. PROJECT: Imp. 86-6, Evergreen Knolls 2nd Addition DESCRIPTION: Sewers, Water, Streets to serve 25 single family lats. CURRENT STATUS: Construction is 70% complete. Cald weather has stopped construction, Will commense this Spring. ESTIMATED C�ST: Feasibility Estimate: $.252,520 Contract & Overhead = 160,752 + 64,300 = $225,052 RENtARKS : � w • �S. . Imp. 85-6, Lake LeMay dverflaw Praject ION: Sewer & water for areas arourtd George's Golf Caurse and Storm Sewer Overflow �or Lake LeMay. C NT STATUS: Plans camplete but bids were rejected. Awa�ting re�ults MAC study and results of of Furlang Addition �'easibility repart. EST MATED COST: New estimate will be available a�ter Furlong study. : Lake Level is still high, could be prablems next spring, Furlong feasibility may indicate that a cheaper design alternative can be considered. : Imp. 86-8, Mendakota Estates 'ION: Sewers, Water, Streets ta serve 34 single family lots, . a golf course club house and an outlot for �'uture -development. STATUS: Plans and �pec� are almost completed. ES�jIMATED COST: Feasibil.ity Estimate: $680,050 . The deveioper has almast completed site gradinq. : Imp. 86-12, Park Place (Wachtler Property} rIQN: Sewers, Water, Streets far singie family develapment, STATUS: Will begin feasibility report shortly. TED COST : Unl�an:own �• PR ECT: Imp. 86-9, The Ponds of Mendota Heights (Warriar Pond) and Rolling Woads Subdivisian DESCRIPTION; Sewers, Water, Streets to serve 2 single family developments, 43 lots total. CU NT STATUS: Awai�ing fa.nal plat, feasiblity report complete. This project i� ta be combined with the Rolling Woods subdivision. ES IMATED COST: $5�1,000 �or combined project to serve all 43 lots. : Considered other aptions for the sanitary sewer thraugh the LaPean propertyr but there daesn't appear to be a better then the aption already praposed.' _. I . .. ... . . ..-- � � � � t'""� .'! i,' � F i V �� tropolitan Aircraff Sound Abatement �ouncil (MASAC) Gh�airman: W iter Ctockenstein, 11 Past Cha�rs: n Dei Calzo, 1979-1982 St nley W. Olson, 1964-1479 Technical A ,Isor: Darreil Wesiander 12, 1987 Mayo Charles Mertensatto City of Mendota Heights 750 uth Plaza Drive i�nd �a Height�, �T 55120 Dear�Mayor Mer`�ensotto: 6Q40 2$th Avenue Sautfi Minneapolfs, Minnesota 55450 (612) 726-9411 � On ember 26 1986, Walter Rockenstein, Chairman af the Me�.ronolitan Ai.rcraft - 5oun Aba�ement Council (MASAC), invited you to join us at our January 27, 1987 meet g and present a brief �tatement regarding the "Eagan Corridor."' Due to - sche uling difficulties, the agenda item has been moved ten�atively to Apri 28, 1987. We h this does not present any inconvenience for you and that you or your city. s regresentative will be able ta join us at that time. The meeting will c nce at 7:30 p.m. a� the Metropolitan Airports Con�r�i�.ssion General� Offices, 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis. If y hesi /jv cc: .,� have any questions or need additional information, please do not e to call me at ?2&-1892. . , J. Vecchi �al Advisor Kevin Frazell ✓ Gity Ar�n.inistratar City of Mendo�.a Heights '754 South Plaza Drive � Mendota Heigh�,s, N3N 551.20 � , � CITY 0� MENDOTA HEIG�TS � • � January 16, 19$7 Mayor, City Council and Gity trator � . James E. Danielsan Public Warks Director . 1385 Mendota Heights Road Building Perm:i.t DISGUSSION: Sperry haS moved out o� the old Comserv building located at the nor east quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Mendota Heigh�s Road. The new �en nts, Printware Inc., also a computer company, need to have l.oading dac s far their-aperation. They have submi.tted the attached plans, and sta f has reviewed them and find� that they camply with the building code req irements. Staf�' recommends that Council authorize staff to issue a building per 't ta allow constructior� af �wo laading dacks far the building at 1385 Men ata Heights Road. AGT ON REQUIREI} • If Cauncil desires to implement �.he staff recommendation they should pas a motion authorizing sCaff �o issue �he building permit. 1 3 rh� c Mr. Cit 750 ret OR pro Buildrng Company Develapers • Contractors • Realtors • MLS 7400 Metro Blvd. • Suite 4"17 Edina, MN 55435 • {612} 893-1950 . January I4, 1987 Paul Berg, Bnilding Znsgector of Mendota Heights South Plaza-Drive ota Heights, M3.nnesota Re: 13$5 Mendota Heights Raad, Mendota Heights Mr. Berg: Pursuant to your request, please be advised that onr campany has been ined as the general contractor to pravide the following remodeling services �eha3f of Investments Comganp I, the present awner af the above—referenced erty: I. Const�uctiOn of twa truck dock Ioading areas on the north wall of the building, to meet the requirements of the new tenant; 2. Construction of a staging area adjacent ta the Ioading docks for handling of incaming and outgoing products; 3. Miscellaneous cosmetic wark such as repainting, installation of vinyl flooring, etc. The e remodeling efforts are being dqne to accommodate the needs of aur new ten nt, Printware, Znc. Printware is a sma22 company incarporated in May af 198 , which anticipaCes great growth patent:Lal over the next 12-24 months. Pri tware sel].s typograghic—quality laser printers to dealers throughout the Uni ed States. The intended use af the building remains essentially unchanged from its pre ious use by Sperry Corporation. • Mr. Paul Berg Page Two January I4, 1987 Pursuant ta your request, attached hereta please find a Li.st of tiie su2r contractors wh3ch we have retained Co complete the necessary work on the subject premises. We trust that the faregaing information is sufficient and, if you should have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. ma j s�r�wi . z 1 Very truly yours, - GUSTAFSON & By - `.:.�� CIATES, INC. _ �., ' . :', , � , _ . � , n . - . -. ��. ,•, . . .. ' - -- . "�` ` . . �, .. ' .. � , � - - . • , ... . 4 , . ;� = .._ , • ' - . �- - .. ' . � ' —x.wrnur - � - ' = ' . . , T - � ' u+e a.t eaa p � � �akw� �►ar. -- ' S ) rrd+Ck a►cr. , . , a .. '� a .,r - , ' .. ...aw: wr - w a.ar - _ _ " _ . 1 _ � � ^ � �_� i �w�i'cw��'�"� .. , . i �ti.� '� _=:_:_ _ `- w m....,_.,,. .._.._ ... . ew�l,ac , _ a,`..�:�•^_ , _.. .. .. _.... _ _ .. .. _ _ _ . __ , - - -_.__. - . �, ., .._ ... ... ....,_ .k _ _. _ . . .. . . ._._. -0 �, .� � I�� „ �� • i I � �� r ; �� i �� i�.�� a� . ' � " . — - � � �I�II��i��l��l��ll�i�, �� ,. . . � - � i-"r.�. . �iIRAMP DETAIL � iI ' , E"'r6� �'w e�.l . - -- � t t , . . eSw.tt ,� . 'i1 . �� — ¢ o-vGw � �o z unvu >o h -- �� ' � � � i I � � i 1 I i � I i ��. � wdr w'—+"' , �' � I I - 'l " - -- " � i ! ' � � Q 1:� _ _ ''.v"� . � ' �t.r,�rwra.�� '==z_�_'=_=2__ y� I � `t _.� _ . r �� - I � � �'� j ~ ••.I � � �.b. - v. oyJ.� % � `�vr.Rk ra�ri-'irta..rc�. I .. ','1. �h1u� aVaf�Yur.l - j i ie � ,D. �'y� f' � ew6.t� ai.z � wa .r� �'.w."�-`s�. � � _ � i �3 i, � _. J�J wt. Frv I�+cco-4�Fy. ; N `rtci vh` � •p p6 �� J�t�C� _ Oz :{ et+ ,• � � t�t cw£4 j � i _ `�.-F'' ' �f� I "_ ' , . . 'R+1tt� WI�• \ ��Yfi ' . I�_ �-_�f" ___ / 16fC: M1iNi filLR bblYlp.� 1b _ t� I i !� <yY==-` / O "l — ='4� tNQ'f{PXVsf'.Y.P61C�• _ ' . W J • . n ' � d __�__"'"'" _ 7r — - ' '"FM.+tScpal�lvL '.832� _ �`'S' _ '__�."""_""""' < 1,�.. _�..l.' ��..� ��__�`� A�7 •T�I. Q i� a, �0 .aN c�rL � — �° . PaD ��+' �e�tal craaf.4� �� '.. I — — '1'�d -RaC i ' O �„ i Q � \ t .l � �' � M cwk h— � � `` Z y. �I � li�t LL'D. :! , 1 1 lA1K2 IkY. - U � mri.�G 'rR4ec M8+ ' -� 1 I .'�.f f. WC II `,,o, y I _ t�r-•- I 7 ' � . I.� :•, G /�-r; M_" /�_O, .• ""'""' f+/F4:4u'60Cf6�PE0. � � - `Gb'f�y/�Li ' �'IGICY��..7.% �` /�' ; ��2 S.b..l -t �axs — — � WY(�4 tYi.L. ! �- 1 I _ . ' � � • , 'i . • 1 : N2 Mhac 4kthR3i + �� '.'f. I j , � .. """"' ` _ \ `- • _ _ a72 `891,�i / ' i I ' ' ' " � v ptyf�Ol�G'C � I— "'_'_'- ' L -^Cc -�� ' - �1 `.� p�� .__.---828:'na •_'"""'�� /�,� ' Rx� PP�fi P�a-I - s� �T n2 h F n:w e k��. k': � -- \ �_ - . �- ' aee aws+.e� r+..l �b�M1o• � rcu<.�e irr* RL - ' - �kJ ar c�s, a�••t. A3o .S4►e�'�' JT' i�i: .�►.ff F41[Fl . �`ro ? � �'.-� *+ 1 a'. � T cr..i'6 us+�� J s e . � • cx x. er . _ ' -�i' ° � / " �. — � . . 'bt�� rro�cf+ u ^corrw.i++- �.5 � � ._ � at.�.w. `bp ` • .� �.�� . � 1 ' � 4• ' .� L} r _ .,, � I • y l,fl6l;Jf ffMf G�I. �� . F�FKa-�4 R►r� ^ 5r(E �'�-PN I , M1td - 3 1'•70' r.w• s o �o m ao �;NORTN . • � I . • a... rnr � COMSERV BUILDING ' � . � � rtr w +� ��.� � FOR RJVESTA�IENT 1 ' .� ' . . . . � � • • � • � • i °""a^ MENDOTA FEIGIiTS. MMINESOTA ' • • • . ... . ��. A1 ` •• • • • � • � y. �� , . . .. �� . r _ � t 'F�' Jt a:.�... C. . �. . e ... � . .,..... _ � i . , . � • ,._ . . , . . . I . 1 " . . I ��r,'pal fn, � � • • . _. ... ,.. _, . �`►^�t� . CaM[oWL~M RY-Ja.Y4Mt xs�..••. -.• ,-•._�... _ . .. .. . . - .�Rn �, � 7 , -......""'....""'•'-•--�_" , xe vwtr.�w. kR ai1.�. ••__--•-_• _ __ � ' .'"' "..�""'_""'""""' J.-__' _ L/ { FC0.Y�i+ I�RL. ' '____"'_��._" - . _ _._..___•_ , •-•-._- _..•__•• •,��t. , �LDE ELEVATION � k�ha �� FR�ELEVATION �- ,.t..,�,. � �I+:E �IJCi-.YcLLl'GKK �MwYK RC�hY+t.'.rH9� ,� . , - • ' lC11bJ �xsf �t : W"IL •1�6� . K"MH' 9ilL tAvt}'. cUAP �+ {6�6iEp a-i nr.r x a.s+ r+c wrtv � As.'.��>-�T'i' 4c re4. �N �P� �Rt S.WL .� [RLy�VNq t4vCJ8 SYYI"`�/d0 �C Mt Y' 'O.l'a: iY A� vYO� N�Is/� �%y1�'m N/L�oniL f rbi ?�ICY eMf K WVYfD: �w.M.�ar. W E��'4 • - �JM� __..._Y._ rowa iw. �c D' .��,� __ ' ' _ ._ ._' " O 4r( z Y6.Yti•�1�'i' N41Y}l N1'l'OL n4Mm�4ITVL.44wfPL�L i.lwsm�n > w'.r0 �� - rc t�xJ Jx � m.�l su�er J/un.l� ' t��aM ♦ )O.r�6 •� rIL i}.W .b b nJ � b✓atL W(aviiE lL�Wa- s0.�.•b"I;" w[ 'C0� N. F6h- v nl e•wfa J% .YG •- .-•� Rzl� F�.M�FI 'zt�Dat � �P o : ' B4 ,, � �_ COMSERV BUILDING FOR INVESTMENT 1 - MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA � - • _. C_ �� 4 '' I " .-.. . �LROOF PLAN � .Is'•�w �✓f}�.� .if' lili!�/k�}�' /l.�t LJhF+{ O'�ENK 4MK�.+ I (ONiM�� I f Ir J � i • ➢!. , 11' - - - - _r �.+�� •a�Nct Ms cd4 e.c �J I" rv' x __ _.. _ w. �. . ...n�'�N .� Q A' � 0 � \� J 0'� \ 0 1 / L='MJ:6 FbiGb� �e \ O � 4C►Y�e�c.lrirlR D�Kai.fbrf""�l LFGaIK�'JL� Y6��l0ib �,.w��. � A l \ / , ix��cc�5"r`en'*-r• r � o-11�oi+t uL1T�A�fii ro �c c�r �n+�i �m,,,er�� a ,.��j ��i�Fic�r�,4b N �'G'eK CV(F' 6 60� �tK ��Y4a- S�tpytt e�t 4r, alf(tii n�c mr�rs) `�yi Z . . i ��` '- a' '� L �'\;. 1� � x.�.� �,.J `� � •.a _ � o• R -- i , ie �. � ;A �` _ � � � • � �\ � ':<•`._ ` a - � � mx :e,�. a . � �e. " i �b, • � / � o n I WY 4.�hf� 1 'IF�ilOU) \ ".� • A! �� ..i-1_�oaR �u►N � ��.. �•.o• . ,.. .,. �.,...., " . ; .,, .. � . • ^ . -� ._ , � , , . J�111\. ��h��Q(�.S 4 l4 7279 ..__�c� h,,, � � ' - ` - - . . . , •. • , —�:.k�r�.�x • _ . axr•�r �c..w w+r� v w��a.l��- -\' •.\�- W,V ►1hIHW ['�R'K�� . �' W Ft�?i ohR- t�Jq � � --� _ _ - . (tol� u��.-( a(oaec FV _ . • � - � .. ... _ Pt '�CP1 G�li.Yi ... _. .. _ PLW+- aa+.Y � - - ... _. . ,. . _ . _. . . . -. ' ' ' . ... .. . .... . ; �.� . . -• ` . � �"=� cT�"t-OrM�6i70vtia'i - . �� ' vesfw fcfi �r I �•pW . N � ' . � M' far�� Mw aar.4� M11 / ��W � _• . j'�• j I . � , -� � � vu �R=. . — - � i `�;- -sK.4 rrF � rwo.r.�.[J z�rc�L'✓Wq'1r•ittor.a.W..• � ± p � "M ' M�+Oti . � �, � : •L•a ._ ._. . -,�"Q"�:,�, �...�J I � "�. �.w. _ gcn�: ru.rav �V.�u. _ , - - ,u.o.r_ '� � e.-., - ••..�t „ 6r• /�., -�,.�� ,wa- � -nr.��..s.� �F�LOOii JOINT DETHIL . �c, n � .tra � � e �•+1- - r.,,- . . \ 1 I�y�•�•p � K"CP+1��P�f. � IFn•� 1 I ' `/ 1 (�LXP!-.DG'�.��. ) � —1 � dr.r.�, n�.� �,...., `rta� a.�.�r, ` � % . oprFerev �rir�.z�o•oa � � �PIER DETAIL nWALL DETAIL '_ • . _...r _ia. J. s�-� i . — . . •n.. - V�cra ' �v '�fd �j� . �'� ' � t: �� Ih'i GRYK 'L rM%{ � Y.1 ) 1 E'�/- aJ 6. W N� ' Iff' 1�'.�_�..Fy _ c� --_ .»' "" "" _ =_� • Y , I ��Wf�L�. JGV IIVI`I �, , • I —_ .p • �' �k i u -- �� rRx�a�K:✓Ft+�Y M�xw��4i ikrl _ b+�� af.- u.�,ee �vscr�c �--is.,r�.. _ ' �� , — • o ��w-�14.� �.�•, I�YaeffCf'�,Rcltl.'Y-lrf•.J , � t 1 � ' 'J"�G�_o_o � Oso'-rJy.' `— — hk . (aY if -. % - ` , Re< V+/[W'- �'( . .� � . � .. . ;E ; _ ' I • ��<Mt.. � �� " , N, • � 1L 59lfG •• N � • � � _ �1'u'r� � r .�. bZ�'(rVl� lY � tl } j IHf H'�� qc!!,1 � � ' s r� . �� 1'i.�� S t'u �5 l•ll • .'I'.. n y�Jlp - ' WALL SECTION `f w, rY� L �. cF j..ti i 1 � ezr'.�� Te li'. ur- �i � � i'`''rv"' •r-Q'. � . e�-. < rt wN �i,�a-'+�rl s �• ea. � s , � . ; ;. � • � ti � — .trc: vak 'fo w.al eicl'-o , ' � " � . '�i. „ � t � ) . a.. r. .i� � W�'�' t �"'"'k [ixx• r-.nmr�r � , b:�'in:,t 1lUi vs.tE.+f *oF RbRw u zu.'. • -• '��fi •RaY�I �_� . Rt MGX+f�xx. CF fa� 4 R%K+ h �_ • i��.N:J . � .. � ��T.'�tla . '6 Rwl «�QLf ' � �i _ ' . _ ��....� .J— . -� . - ---�" -� J - �- '�_ n�: "f'" ' . 1�= ! 2•hc v�j yeffl:�J ' �i qry u4L n W�- �CTb� � SECTION THRU DOCK ^ SECTION THRU STAIR rh•-no• %4'•I'•o• � ✓ �/4'• I•o COMSERV BUILDING - ; ` . ' - �; ;�," °'" ,�,�,n �:a,., FOR INVESTMENT t ' - ' " w�.� • ' ' � � • • � • • � MENDOTA HEIGFITS, MINNESOTA � ' •. . . A3 .• . � . ~ . . ..T . 1 . r • ' ' �w C � . . ' i .. � . . . • � F, .1. . ._ � .� v.. � �. �� _ T ' a y�LIMC.SLA► KI � � (iru-HB.�.WQ.y� MCSM (> S E 51 I" � I I • � • �\\\ ��C�e.5i0lNAbc P� I is� �.�3`0• o.� � \��• �I \ � n'e....R�r.wn«. Dti�, i B��ST•I 1 FRIo. L Cowc.St�D I , �' �N I ♦ a n' s.c ►.w�v..r c..nn) ^- J,'= ' 4 I �StB �/CN. IIR L.wO LL[J.� � . F e' � �o. M�` �� 1� o'r �=o"rK•'� � ' V 9� q MRS 4eR. \ M1� uW eM1A'V ITYrILI.L� / !. / R� 5 vycT• 6AF5 (4 isT��) \ ..1~ ` -aGlc LeJa• �� ,\ �'� 4 .li" V} `� � � n. T ' c� � I -h.i57. wMa(Sw.oeo)10 ec 1[erdeD. ry� � 6'DtuN SaAD•-S[, 4/�� bM1 1y � `�+ �L \ � I �ID¢Fnr+ 6aKTN6 �CP. FK.To 4ro �f. �r�� tP 9. \ slpF¢ a.�sr.s.n �seJp s iyp'v. -5cc S�cT. 4 '�y 5►40�L{(SWTrMw ) +�' ° sa \� � 'e. Ta �•-.• .c ^ �' � - �J ' � ,y *• a.e• ' � I b. \ .9. ' T -'. �LK Yvn�{R.-$ElARGH. 4 [srK.y�.s. e• •r \� � 1 T.i.s t�n+.. ste s[cT• �_• � J� --g V�M.�ONL.SL 6 � , tia4•w1.9 ++�9��M - � �'. �- I I T•wS.o�.bSo�_�. �'�'•� 4' Ce.'c.O�w� en k .I�urti ! 1'-e' s.c. � `,' bM1 BL�' • W � y M t .o. I I �2.•GicT.f'f6.RL.b1'1�2• Z I n r-RCMOVED �fCR6Q'O• u Ste I/53 Fe1e STAIR � I .76TA�L. I'1oTLS: FOUNC/�.'TION PL�.N � e�evwTioN LALLC�HITMTMy R oOF FRr.MIN6 PLAn! ��b. � �� _ m RAw K D�SeD oN �a�STi'IG MIILDIub libw c �� p�• Cia/�WINDS �GrA'amiY6WDR AI�GHITI/CIS. 4• SToFM SLwOR fRmM7RLNCH DIY.IN IS . �(o SE loMNCGTC7 T GXISTN6 G�T[H DASIN.INKRT C1.EVI.T1�'fb 6L VGRIP�CO eN 7N! FIl�O. o�Ow�. w Ifi Li. ! l-e'�.c . �tC AMD S6T �V WM•Mp.IMFINfi iROY7 txK4 SMm Tsm.aJ 1 cwu�KW .lo�wr(u�G'Mn.1G SfxAw7) nf'-i- l � lXIST MAK COMSERV BUILDING , FOR INVESTMENT t MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA _�: _ . , \ ^�y �� , ' l 0 O % D� e. w r�s. n�. �eove uNvs M1.�� w.s. r��. eew.+ sRnoa .� � �i VIwT. aMs r a Tms s s' ..c . �11 D E T.'+ 1 L I '/1^ _ ��_ o• q'_p' ' ..1"S�fT v1LLlR 66TWClrI WAI.�S. ^�s 4. �, / LNO p/.Li O' NCN WA��. J1 / Aeove uis7. val.www '�VJ •Ai J�6i1ST. FDN.��L ,�� /'•., ' � ^ -R14vl0.T.Cl�4�•Nu.ME � '--' �LGeM15Tbl�D B MR � toc�TioNs ir.-w�oc w� Souo f�l LaNG. �2, I� E T A I L � j�4. a �� 0. *,r•' tGN. '•H.�O}NipE0.i6� --�V�bl1 �� wT4o �Mlcw� G! � I�.S . SF4 pooF pV.N Tsr� �4 oFGb 2 6RG.To 1{VEL 2'Ii+2'Is , �/p'Y. r+'�c. a-/a'0 � Y ��os, ft � nes.wn�� SY1RS�/3�%� t� UNi. S �e r�cK u� v�cr�. " �, ♦ T rvi�p m4T c c,T.w�« > %3\ D E T A I L iT'r. -1e�s7 pRc. 51 3/p' x �'- p' vr s ihte...a a .�s ,tof.e. aeins a .nm .nwe � so �z mm. .rs..� s.e f. r�a. nss .im �oL� w�l�r. � 4�y�M0 tYyNION �a�eounw�.arttcr� _.- 1 . S/0' / i 1 �-0" l��i �oOtL Mn � 3'-0' o. . Gnu� m� �fa� so em�ns ema. m .�.�-a� • s�.«,.�,.t...� �«.,�. Sl � - ' � . .. _., • , • .r .� ,,f. . . . , - . . _ .„ . . . _ .. - ' . . _ . , ` • s:.• .: . � ,:,. . - " . .. . . � . • v . . , .* - �� , _7r�,.i , � ,�. ' ' , . ' . ' ' � .. , , ' ' . .=,,�N ":�;; - • - - � � • ' ��;,^. r ` ' i. . ' � . � . . ' ; ^ . �-�,., _ ' . •.5 " � � . . . - , e'`',: .r� � � . , . >. ;�<y" . � � ' . + ;Y' - . ` _ - . = ,: . . . ` -- - �'•• ' ' ' ,"� `L. Y{� ` � +�z. ��y>�� 1' . - • . ..a.' ' 'i• .. � � ' t ... ��' ..7.. . . ' .. �... . . . y'A.,. . � � �r . 1, . ' , :, * . . • .. . . .. ,, ,_ . ..> . _. , ' ; • , � , ^ � • ' 4 " - ' '�. ' �. r`."' .� ' . . � " � . � r i-. 4 .. _ 1 . . .. .. ' ' f�'M - - . .. . ` . " " .. . + • 'f: • '•'p' ' ' • Y •f.r + r ` � ' n..4 " yl._' , ' ' .. ' I J1 . ,�'haSh.Y1Y Ci+T. ny,c .. .. . . .. • ' . '' '" ` ' • ., . .2 . .* '. G .. � . • • " _ T� T�/ �f LMwMM/L JeKK.' ' C - • ' • 4 • !i'h'•44 Ga. u+n�rn.l.�.not iu�Y :S•" ' • ' ` . , y / /�� rf �1 _ : •, � , ` • "' . . . 5'n.. v�cK. -� . • j ' ' . � - . ' . , .. , � � y '�ti�� ' . . . � .'�' �. Nv+ cma .I'x. e.�sr. .or � `- . _ .{ .. . . . . . , . . .� , . �. . . , . / �i . . . e�.. 4m_asG. i . . _, � . Pr�I el�cF � .{ .. . . ;�. ' ... ti `' _ • - . . ♦ r-... / ..� W nATM tllR. . � � , . tt.Mb'-t• . CCGK G.�y� �.; • y • L1O I�ii�'1T6�.ST�.OK 9 MATGM t�ltT• ��.41��i � � "t" • . .. � '� We j �V� l�.. ' . . .. .. , r oww�sr.a. ; . . ' 41�0 - — --- . ' '/ 4: � �'/1' DFG.1t '_ _ .MG�cw.r1Y�L.NeTtNlOTM{WjG6K.,. '2-1t'Palti'Li.A�O � . - G4 LM�NN�L�SlL Fa► PLwN �, a ' * ! .•. ' /• % � 1' �WT• L4aI.1 GMANuiid • . � , ' .• . � 4��'Lsl�/l�l LUaf.i iNwW�t4.. � 4 M�a VLPT. aRL e JAMb W /.ti 1i� e 1�+•Li. M� 1JK �4'tTlOS. Ri�� GmP�S SOLIv lu' W�DG . .� _ � � � 6 t � 61�iD �6AH � �i � b HRL. .. � , • • DM. Te Ii6. Tff.! 1�n6S. . ' � • .� ' . � ', ' � ' ` ' 4na�cc • T(rILAL BEAM 6R6. . . . , . ' ,> . 54 . - � ' y�. M�pAM �a I 11 tY4� R. , .r 1 AIR . . . - ^ ' ' L.. �i7 •Y• . . �� 6Nc� •� �r .w � � I � . `� ' � •Z �'[RT. M6 RCnM. vWtf.Tm FTG. . 4o GAGfl CmFRJ6sA7LD TIK .� �5lG RAN' . .. 6 1L" I.i. V4T• t H'eR1L. �L,_ , • R��wa . see ��cn. � S E C.T I O N .. . .. . . ' " • II 6J[tlMD II►lS IU' IM71 WALL e � �' � ^ , ` ! 5 Q 4'-o V[RT. WM1S.Te �. �1►lM6L`( AT 9AR uGATWN• � ��l' �� . . • 1 i � � • . ' �• ' ` r�� c.Faa s.��o t ewn usw.Timws �i F�.+c [w► . 4iT IN �II Q 6AWpNRCO Ar�GNal� 6oLTy. �3es� KI NNc. . I LOOIcpMA7Y W(TN 6YMRR6�lR4EF• �S ryAN IM. MR I.�cATNN� �l Jtror n�s. ' '3 � � --- ai.. iso -o• � � I vew�( O�MCwf1�Mi �T pOLC UVGLGR MT1 f h� `��• �T�. SWK O['�.ry A6d! A7 v-o' plr�p7 5��[T�� wuFKNRaR. , ' _, . . FS LmLYMN �N LALN i1DC. " e.s.4� Y wl'K'.�'s�ves. �S r�w. �eru. x�u .� �.r.-.+a�...i.� MisN _ �a•s e.ro xw.. .+� z w5. c..rt. � �C is• o.c. , - . • . a ,_ . � 3 e+�cT. nw5. n�. + T+•S. t�.8D0� 4 �� T.09.4. VAR1l5 I ' SLA� Q SInItAF 1_ � �`•' ' 1 ��EL.B'b�-4 " i/�SCI.bR�fi , " 1 „ _ J •.' .,_:✓�' . � 'f ,-. ,,' � ' � � ' • --- ^' ��'�'� ,'�' n' i _ . . ., 'a _ s . ' ', . ,� �a ._ .__Z_ ' . .J ... ¢X�sT.A FDrJ.Nwu.. � � , 3'd vJlErNmLt G lo�-i �.L. _�4 6 7{��.c.Ve.aT. ��t•Te Fii. .. , s.s.�w'-oK� ', '+ •, t W D4wH G�N�_i.y � N« LMN6 MR. i• • Lr ��L 4RC5 SmYO L OwF Li� T�aNt. '.Y '_ � �14!/�'4• ' � ^ • � � 1LI• X'6 �tAN bR MM1 LOLATIOM � � � 6tIST.IT6. � �IK UPM LiMT. FM� DFICK 6pp. . F qf� �'! r . 5C4 ^F�HrtEM1uL F� KM' INK ' . �, ' Io'M) 1 � 4 o I'-dI`L - 3i ..i`'� - t� + .A+ w4M1 . , !1 S ewrs M� ::�� _ •4C'li'e.c.e�W. ._ . . • , 0't��. �TYr.Ea'-�'� • . � '. SCt ARLM.IeR IaSYt. j 1pr p' Na�/ LeMC. NLl Ta Df i d t=l� •� ow�t. F 44'e.c. �� , � • e'e� eveN wTl'P�I eP CaKT. fwoTMb, ' . ^ �5�. ' ♦4 t It'�.c�io• 1 � -• . • , . 4 I 4 toMT. 11'(ef�rY fi�Tf�o�', , • . � , - .. ' . .. � • . . , ' �rTil W4L3. AF�N. FIRIMWL. :•/. � i1 . —_' �� s � v aww , ` ^x, , ' - r , �N Ii. ; �: � � _ . �. .. ^ ' - . ' . � i - 3'-0` � . �, � i S E C T I O N ' �, .�, n%'2`{'"' S E C T i O N� ''`` � � S E C T I O N� � C41 S E C T I- O N.(��FP�NNIaG 2lOcwTioNS� , ,f ' " _ 'M• • �'-d . �11' , ' P-o• . . � yT ' I'-n' �M' s �'-d . _ . . ' .< . - , : .Nof�: ' , .' ' . � ' M V uNo6RLy�ai /MTiRNL IS �mmSQ IT MAY OL > ,ft , a ` ,. _ , r ' ` , u(i ' . , r, . ; .. MV235MRY Ta RAL� NK 1N 7M0 LIiTi. ` . Y��COMSERV BUILDINO - . ._ � . , • • � • ' . ', � � � - . , � , �.`�Foa urvesT�nrr i . - "" � ' ' . � • • � : • • • . r .�. Z ( a:.r� ♦.�`5�+, •� :., r � . ' � •y-�: ,+ i. . . . � ' . � � " . MENDOTA FEK31iT& MINMESOTA . , • „ � ., � • • • • ... . , ' S� L . • . . , . . . . . . 'r, , � • . �' • � � .. . . � ! t x ..;Ml��;�t'x rtii..�� NVF": `:lya`.::n�,.X : ..: �:.>_.�`.�=»ri:.;, - + s;7�h' .e`; . �.:,�t,.,"�H,.L•'+L.j+i,`;,, `jrf(::��4afiw'C�Fi; � � , ,, a. .e�..i-s.-r y. f :3°,%S'� �:�. "3�•:1"'r�� . ° ^ ' . , ' }� , � [ 'Et ' . ^c . . _.. . , 7'. . _. . .- . _. ., +':" f.`� . . - ^. .. ., • - . ... - . , .. , i _�� ' �; �..Y,�:;. .. r .. �'a`, " w, , - , �� "� . . . -; _ � iw+.�-"'. . �. z , ., � " - ' � . �.�'' ,�ef . ' " •li.-�. :'T��.iw .s . • � ' • � : � . . • �!' , . 'I` � f?�P p . r ` � . Yc� " pn 4 ' ' ' . �t� .i:l�� f r .1 ''!. : -t` • . y... .e'- • . , � rb`o-. '�L,^'}`, . � _ .. . � - � f • ,. . .. ' y. _ . . • � ti�^J{ p� � r' .. , v��. r.. . . - v. :'„�r: x ".-i.� ..h . ' ��r.» ,ge.,•an='. t . J4+� h � ,:,.��,�...4 . ��.' '.� z . ��K�.� 'n . . ��,. ... . , .`w -{ �N. ��t..t � a. . . . .. .. �:;i!:.+1%, a aiPi� ` .anA a.:, . _� , � . ^ 4 {' ,� _ .r• l.i.... f. � c ' . . - _ � , _ _ . ' �_� ; R.^ �• _.....Ki � .� .v ir . . � � .s _.. �Y�.�.., k ' � . !.� .f r .,. 'iR. ... •. � l . . .! .. ... : -i _ a .. . . ;�•:: . . � .,, r.. , ' ;. ,.<<-`'. , .., ; _. .. ` . ^ �" >�' :I..,s`� ' _, _ y . . .� . ;`4 . • •- z +t. , - . ,. . � , . �� . . . , , . .: . :� .. • _. : .. - � , - . • . _-. . . - _ _ .. ' . -- - � - s. an .m.s,�ssa, .nui w aaur �..w.a.r.w. .tu w�meu.,+ a.xu. ` �. c^� i"T "�� 'D^io4S0bL Er Ial2xle{ ieyWnrnxs WTI tvran u7t wa:-�i <arseu can�ti^r� ' " • t � . ° . s.s em.�. �%4mi:tm. �mi��. cosw nn.rrlw. ' . •. cmens:iw �i".i"�mn0°�n�+Vl: .�.�a+�+• r� sw ,w .wt ' . . an: , ' 2. ppotneeor .M17 nnp •11 6tre�iau aaf eaetlUew �.0 �tb wrpn + ' r,�p� �� ecvatlR[d ep+ottfwtlrn. tu PNto Mt�r1 �. ��C+�. u�w11 u dl aeeentr w3w W �r• �nr. W31 M.• ' WtNcuw if Mav. ul W�.rna u�¢nDmu.. �fl N nDe�O,�''.:-� pe : kM hw In.a� awntl�f. •. •. • iwes.e�la tu W� lrsYN4t. v. Y. : , t 1M�+1V �+7 tlhlu (�BLI Cp�TV. 111e1nr r•� NviI1 M tf'F i+i t. �11 letw ua.nfafercio�iLall a bDc (M [�w feMt. '� • � • -• • ' �h� • • 3• p�1le�e[�11» Iwa 40 MS . ' i .•r -_ •.' IrW w hx �b11 wrt�e 4eadfx. Sb �ulw [�nturv ot InW adeenn ma M14mN �t YM , ` ). hmt�r� fM �ort�r 4 fra� waorf an�xeuetlrc a3n11 M 1T+lI �� alsr sGl} omiva t0 tL Sollwrlryt Nt+rv g+e� ad 8 aMse µ+A' ima Mw11 n�oirn en e)) W r+. _ . ... • •' quli�rnts if �iton 8ni2NK i+b� MA •4islro. C+SNsn � . tir�pp nh¢s IliWaap� N hRens� ' + . ' . ' • cL1arcSA� atVl! e0t 4 wM Sa aor'a. (°%} t°t! • .. i • .- . " � , ��. Cpwhaetim� S4s Iint ea�w� nt +1) M]l� u�sx� 1M11 b I�ti !ot NCHm� Ht! lwe �er Mee1m� HW l�ut � ' -� fe � NIl M6 0! �ort�r. All �m1t� w�11 b l+ta Ntb tWl f�w alrn�lm Lr COn 12` �frrulw Y ee prae�r '- .. , ' .. 4�4+ean��111W1mtoreN oana»N Yart W.11 M 4a L uaaed- • • , MH.11 wrur MG. 111 GM W rot 7sinf� aE�ll M IAll..l �nlldli" 'p M ��j 60 - , .. �� ut� wAtA tW 'Gu1164 Co4 WMSCIrvL to! b1► Ht4 �ertu lOv � OLtmw SA 7m� tN IXCn W tb Wp m� Yell ef4 0 t1 �j0 65 SS ..• ' `- -� ' ron,.a oe.e..e.•. �cx'�+e-e:, ur m. a�uam. ,_ 1 i•.. m.a w rat�.•. or ca• vw�we+t ae. .n-i�,. no,�:v _ s�a.4 70 i0 - . . . . zar faaesm.l eme»a zor Lui43ep •� jM�71t - _ .wma .aall a rfasafa.e .: Y�+' shterwu L� co�n u» mrir�nal . . irrlw/ t475. 111 stt�aQtY asM Yiw ai+ iFiC ' �` ynE wrticai �eixts. ml�aa eW.aHr v�M. . s. IZ wtq at aagePf� !s luiN sDm� NYPf. cx![r atss+rStb . ' • .. y�tp� 5. hTlG Du•O�Mai Ssrismul ntu�ertinr: +r «ria2 we M1t.+ n.r. Sa �tt a�N� Sa aiar b2on a��ut is a00l. m mt tlx eeenR Htt .L 0 Int�[tee iLb s rnG�� a.ua ra. �'sw.v u.,.�.� aM.� o7.�.i7: �iR t+T. W'��J �1L. �aILSLSQ up fn wurY ?m/ �Mii er+� 'inu��•� �.r . K4 �Inw� et tit�r ml FipYi� pv�let � t�q�ntuta • .. up 14[o�e1o` �t'Iti' o.e. �i0�pt tM Iry tbl�� ur� MfRll M. q.C. p�• F tW 100%. v .- - e �Ilnetlwi` /�-IX1a�pl:w •Cmtunl eme�bY �.Om PS val3. l�la W fa Y�fn6 baq w bn'fMm• e]I" .•nl..[�arfe2. S. b Qetw t�ntm^� et Sx�W cnocna. uyLea O¢!ei blev � . • W w�oon eota� Sospwt M L r�m 1 amltamHm. . YM1C� � atnlws 6• IV �C �Vliv�. Pe++7N w+rl�t p hMv�n1 mal fhK�nsu�� (Wlw W°fi� �L+11 v'M . r 2st�rlar emea�t� rbll Ls� Sf atots mcnlaN �Sr. au ua easa�s wits at Seturetln5 wll+ toe rwvN l+ln �T is 6. Yeo rw dlif w�9roe ppn tmw i� Lr �tm Wir �11 M� . .. . � 3-.. twk tmt. W pLa� !ns �ailaHw�. � 1+ �9s31D{ Wataiw6 Sa a`eLt aWliiae at a twpnt+uY -. ' �j. itiat Kn2 �iT M 36M lEiS EtyL � r[wtf tas tiN L h. Oontaet iW �Wie�s Zar »xtieal selaLivtic[ Cwl.an sa'sd nWa�- 1tM tim Swt LOl' tt Lut H!m !R iViM 4}� tee !iN - . • ima� D�lut�n �e6 lro �ni'+vp MNaII v M irW W. . vfa+J� aarb ttxm�c4 emenq vaf+[�r SSZ tia�lmd s�resS. Yan '` 6. Bismtlml � 1�Lll M 18'A� l-X N�u roW KLSNM. -- �d➢+�UAeo IWe�� +p li�rtexn �MeJ��0M�4toe 4�t1,�� +L[. 1mnLda[. ee tery- � 7. �Ia�eMl wM fml i^Lb. �Lbr ba� q�w�� ml� = SYuim Nlleu� b[iu�t�n tat /3 P. +M A1 1Y tM torne� Yoxf[ �WII b wd� 4 M+a� bt �Le�t. 'A� . so6..�1. u. Misw�a t�ae�lnroLu' sew�. em�atae Ln�pm� � . J- 3' xae �t �5' I�r�/Jt 57 t�r M �+W�Y+an �e�u M�a�awu w uLUL tr e�amn� t�ntvw � " 143� t� Mt1si. MMent enr�ta��lM' �il �troeeonl �l�mt� � �i F�7nlmo1e6 W'�. Wll � � MnitSwwl +eeMMAr. sr CY �1Nwt Su1m� Ga te ewcmacLc ot Wt. CwAaatlmlutYn � +�wd+�a •s s.d..r aw.a,nno. w�'u eeR3.nan a ms, s�Nat. - ae+wi .m �ew w..ew+a w m+�� nf.+t,em..a a�-lw; rmeatui�.. .e.0 w� 6. a..a art.� es. tfr.s 1M ae.., .r1... p�emtsm. -' , - a nona+ nw�r'u o� *a� as �a• o.�. su au f wu..ti+os a�� swa iw�sac . t. e..ne°� sms a..�t w=,.s.r.. an .�+r� r:1i w�i� n...� , si=i,..a .,+ utm m m�*.ns •,m�+ at ewu.m m �a«.: w» .ssc» „ . iOT �. f'�. � Dk at�� W+ !e! N+21 Y S8 +Y.�r�.r H W LY4f !4'P'. t�i8 s8\enpiiai3A1. - � �44Ailm Tnte� � � W sti� K a�aG ei 3/M1'. C 1*1sa d3nrSN iMii i. fafttdmt AM�esim aIIs21 M D�1Li L W aea�t� �Itss a� . M . t M u�G Snym �1 P[ to� �vcA klut elmP� Sn ti�� +t W�Ir faN� w �. �SI teetles �1mHau Wmm 4� to tp e1' feeHap. _ . L Ww[Ses et �w,11s N�11 W acevpllWM F� ro� af Vr lallm�le� WtW Wumt b tW emet�u qpeSe� a11a+6t�dy follwln�� ^ , . Z. LLl fmtloP ta M apt�nC �o r w1L 4 aalm �btl�r� st� - rtlw4 mlw des�a eWMr�� ro tY rns'W[ M�1o6 w bOs u mitan r Mdibl.�. m neq(� . tMnhw mtwt. .+ '� t ` (�S Pl�n� 6�t Se �Sns 1'-P 114't� u1 o�1lGV. aWwem� slm6+ Wil mve �aNl Y/ L sf w� a W7 ' • • ` - ) Dkatla� S' �lwr sswr f� �11 too�� lotmermt: �- d- .. .. • I31ar 6�t to Mk Yor atWsm o( t5 �1nu:.- t�tY..:. L W 2�-lez f�.et. • .. i. riMa� wli tsetl% aslKy�w�y ta aEeak 1w[� at tad b 11�34 M «cR �eeu�G=s6 �•0" liZs. ' A Yern taa:t� is M�M Aaxie[ Nlae ett�i t+M�nmv CM2w - • � $, O�yyy� 7#D !an ai4. �12 df HiY ioi �f��T � . - {Ci Tlab pwT Se YxSN b'-0' Il1[� +ad s��0+�i1Qxt�. �Tf r it IwG a� �itT� s�y�y ttR V�1�n' t1at1 b i!� tst dawL�in tmtSeP m rmE Mn aMm �a+ wle�fa=sY�sIL a� �, tllav ams m ns tar atataw �t �t bu� htren ��K [ te tb zaLW rtrnetm� �t e+u�i w6 • • -.. , i�m ooeme oo� ma .�m n�me �o..�. r+ eee�.os wose '- .ce .�.�aine e�-v iin. r�+�.+ae �i..e.w.. .� e«ua b� uoa. o..n rmr w�.a �.r .�.meun. uwni. wm �ey or reaW� mLu � atLn.nw. MAr fo' ' o.npr er eon. so M rul.a. w quM.+ wu e. a.ew .s 9 Yn r er nws. ..pis.a ' brnq fe eolwe f0orie� Gvw3� u3 �W�bY WwL fe w]i lestl�pr . 9. 4lt �um� 1L+31 w l�ia ay ln �1M FaW. �ml.�a �t1 W I�tM tM ILpav. lhi� �s4� 411ediu .a.0 r l. .aunm m sw . olw mtN oWxalw. ' otWM�� q tb �edw�r. ts 7'bMl �wMs 4�te� llnin Mu� b IQ 7�6�!� 4Qe� ` 6. 64an �11 w17a. tlqvt�l� M[w� 9�eRt111iK �el asqqtl�. � 10. Pfm1C� emtt+bl jolat� �t wim �O�A' e.c. 1n wtuetnr rnils . �st �rtn q11n0�e �Wil M�M fK �np wt et Yr ll-4,10 .r " • 7. YW hotLN �aii M�tssswi 1 wrtiaRt to 2 Dalwnnt �E alr � Dm+ O+a+• ' Tn iu tM eTiielwr+. . - b!tlse2a� ml��a ietad' tMs+rin ae �Ia. - tt. lsmidt e' ot��y�ia� n•a6 tor nimt iinteic, t,�irRt vat»ss - g. Qtcir cilarl4 apaii eos M auQ u e aSdtH« !� sv¢su. - o }rt �t b iCvntme �Mll M/�+a� w irwe teli < famlaktm. t�G asb�xtw. riil Dlack cm+� wli6 te! {� c�+w� !••tar � • 9. 131 fmtle0 wi+ 4�Sm�Q fer 25oapt Mtl Mu�lnG �Il apa11 Mvin6. mUw noW aWs+l��. bf Gel�l �fi�ll b trwM hv vltifa Wy�y�yy��y� , • " � • ' ep�etM�te 9.SIi M� IfWlt� rtl� � D�eYLp �llST �SSi� d ' ' ' I< +Yli v tL� CmRwtx'Y n�pm�3D11!�y b t W �ne�w W rilL Losw{R1T +MaW DS � eap�} �� Ris M W gLernt at tootiag 4h3rasai titi�mtid wtttaas eon _. r � fiii !WL b¢W+T• tM a➢an Yail � at W 61�bntla �t •. ` _ �. ' ` (�enesm.l es..t rom T.o.s.63o�_4��i.• _ _ . 1. u�p2 .smasm.i ts..l +m .n.yus wn. sm. m aeema.ee• .isa ss. A � t a.+U(efw>T uA7W� . ei Bwii Oee�i4mHm�Lt�i�L �GSt! � antlioN in pw 1ZB1'lla�i ___�..,.� ¢{j,,:_.5��! __„�.. Yw. . 2. All o��aHeeW Nall � N�ye�t� SmmlL+ 4u� �ettw lNlaasM � " � ' u MrrM.e wmcr.sed.. � m Wm+. nnr+ ew naetlm. u. net lmluaa. raawanm. an�u � �:p' m IWorin6 ��t� W31 6�m ee7A wrWr �uumf am- b M�Vdq to ��poa< CW � m!!un letl aaWc1V ot tM Mo . __ _.. _. . ...___._..... . haat3rm� ' - toe tW W9�� Nmr �l �G�1 �qoltl�d. . . 3. �U b2tM ema�¢tlma��y�� b ves ritL �l9113ZS Do1L imbu � 1. QaoatveH� xtalaL W�t12 D� mrinQs �tendr aa6 pnMW � • • • ^ antM eth�xiM mp3u� )�s�e+ain6 sn tN tI80 �aifluCm� tm� � .. toeq�� t8a4 pwnnt nt�x 2'.ta mt�rSV[ tb rurla7s. Bhmtmsl Jotab IIy�i�� t.�Sfl 1i25 ee i4901o1U'. Nfafm De2t . � 4. 57» mav6 i�s �vM1 uoC �W71 b b�YN Q � Sn6 wWr - s.�' . 1r A�11 w�161M �b�ll M Em� Sm �eaa4m� ir1M W 1T21i Meltlwtlaw � + m poax. �ertu� eaqr.tm.. bsr... +1P°l� 110'7 t.rr.a te m zto n•ea... 4 N� Dr+4S ^-� �. " 3. !b rostar a�s�tm� null b�alctatnW �Dm� tayrtl+K. mHl ' .� BrowY cwTMD :, .. . �• a3� �j. ORMi Wu, ud 11npL �WDartb m M,au! �Eall bw � aL. E� �Ry � ' I �'� � , e - • �. Vb1n tb t�Ertm� e[ tl'l�yae��y i L Mlar 29�l.� W) t buie6 Ht! uen� B�iM Sull tee t11M mt¢»� N7w Nas=n6 , , ;y �'. .� YDail Dr b�tM �o tD+J m�9ers �P'l. t LMSr tW 4! me. - iat �Isu 1mStl eWavit�. � �• '• i- • -� - _c . , o.ae..mc .�x �. .,au.¢. . s. �°c+.: nw.�yyp�y� .,.onn ..w e+.r �.�v saau a.:. . : i. �M+�T tblt W s1�M aaiS m se�6 mtae�m tamlaLims IIw %• ➢l+ts taY Iina+3 � tA� eD�Ky,� W ta oz W wll w1MQ �w Z'4 � t�• N � Ot r T.Ri. 8ZL.7` u se. m.mr. a ia. motte� t7�e. mL... u.da .rb.nrs... r. . � � 6. 111 vn�t e�V3�GQ �uma'7 �0�11 N WaW�papN �lnr +,FR°l. ta � a . � � Si v��iG�lv a�te' m! F'Nt �e6 t4e at Lut 2�� YL1a'�� " ' � ' ' x K(R '> ^ bM III Pm�Cl�n6 hamt S� �. .' , ' '' 7. dM�st R'>bedm �a�il M R 14! ttl R�4 �ei�tw sac! . ., - � ' 1a19r �Pf Let :1'OY wpri=6 SiM �u l. - ' - $MI DfCkla[ Reta� ' " A. �1�` ePaaY Gew�LD b Ci}eia enidxiY �Da21 mY M uN u u s6dltlw Ln Mestae m� ' ` 4ewt. m t. OL��1 iwf GeYSu6 WIl M'U�' -]2 V6 `IawxrtLt+ m� YfM LID• / •�^I �• � ` � m7 �11 M M�1�C� W. �aa uebarN to tM �uaenv�l �Wi � , + - �yppoeu Sa uoeas�n�rl4b tW �x�etunn fW �qeifld� • . � _ t1m� �oC W r��n� af tb 8b�1 Art�LICW� m1�Y ... _ • ' � , . n - MYM otL�sY1M. � � - �tor ef ftB ee2v. , , ' . . .r .. _ • � 5tEPm+.P'i.w�. ' t " � ' •� I STHIR OL7I.IL - , e .. " , - . .. ` .. _ ' � ,`r � - ' • S� � �. ♦ � p�w Ora T�M , . 1- _' '' .I • . _„ _ COMSERV BUILDlNg' � - . - _ '' � .. , " FOR �rnrEsrn�'r i , , " '. - ., � • � • � : • • � , "+; . • ` ` •- MENOOTA FEIGHT5. MINNESOTA � , . r • • • • �� . ' - . - - _ �. . - ,• : • • • • . � , . .�1: � ` , � ---' .. . +_j �_ a. '�y •. _ .. _ r� � �_ a .': . :V�^. � �' .. 4 _ _ � * �. n?%R ,.. i_ ' ' .. • , . , ' + . . . '^ i . � ' - . `f.� i.' ,�`"' �,.' -'� _ . .r �j� .�.' � i Y":. v , ' ,. . • �,^ .. , • ' . ' . ' . ,. . ' :"" : h .r .. _"4``1l +G: � � � ti .' . r -_ - y _ . , • �� . } r,y'`',��5 r . .. � . T .i_ .. µ /• .._' .. " , •. T• ' � .. ' " . � r � ' . . ♦ .. . - ni' V � _ r' . - " - _ • _.�=,.`S^ !." , .. _ . ' � �IST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPRDVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 20, 1987 Pavin License• Ace Bl�cktop, Inc. Pine B nd Paving, Inc. !.i cense � Dasen ontracting Campany, Inc. Midwes ern Mechanical Murr P umbing, Inc. Rayca xcavating Thamps n Plumbing Trebor Contracting, Inc. United Water and Sewer Company Gas Pi in License: Americ n �urner Service, Inc. Benke eating, Refrigeratian and Air Cond. Consol'dated Plumbing and Heating Company Dahms eating, Inc. Egan a d Sons Campany Fredri kson Heating and Air Canditioning, Inc. Heating and Cooling Twa Kleve eating and Air Conditioning, Inc. Sedgwi k Heating and Air Conditioning Ca. 5tand rd Heating and Air Conditioning Total Energy Heating and Caoling Ameri W. F. Charl Deter Duane Monty KMH E Linvi Nille Axel , Olsen Relia Ryan � Susse D. S. Valle Contractor's License: an Remodeling, Inc. auer Construction Company s C. Cudd Corporation an Welding and Tank Service, Inc. J. Bui lders, Inc. Girard Homes Homes, Inc. ectars, Inc. 1 Associates, Inc. Huilders, Inc. I. Dhman, I nc. Fire Protection, Inc. �le Homes, Inc. onstruction Company of MN, Inc. Corporation 'rudeau Constructian Company � Investments, Inc. Heatinq and Air Conditioninq Lic.: — — � American Hurner Service, Inc. Earl Arnesan, Jr. Heati�g and AC Henke Heating, Refrig. 8� AC., Inc. Bostrom Sheet Metal Works, Inc. Burnsville Heating and AC Centraire, Inc. Egan and Sons Company Fredrickson Heating & AC, Inc. Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co, Kleve Heating � AC, Inc. Sedgwick Heating and AC Company Standard Heating and AC Total Energy Heating and Cooling Valley Aire, Inc. , Plasterinq/5tucco License: Zimmerman Stucco and Plaster, Inc. Slqri Erectin4 License: Midway Sign Company, Inc. Nordquist Sig» Company Suburban Lighting, Inc. Masonry License: Ken Nelson Constructian H. Stockness and Sons Suburban Cement Constructian , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO ARY 15, 1987 Mayor & City Council Kevin D. a�eYY�City _�,��✓ CT: Comment for Public Ordinance Administratar Hearing on Draft Noise Budget � For some time, a Noise Budget Working Group, appointed by th Metropolitan Airports Commission, has been working with coming up with a"noise budget" ordinance to apply to the aperations at Mp s%St.� Paul Internation�l.l�,irpart: '�he purgo�e of the ordinance is to reduce the amount af noise creatac� by�airc"raft operations at th airport, by limiting the total "noise energy" generated by all us rs. The recommendatian of the majority of the Working Grou.p is an I8% reduction over the noise generated in Augu�t, 19$6r which wo ld be equivalent to the naise generated in Augu.st, I984. Attached is a notice from the Airports Commission of a public he ring to be held an Wednesday, January 28, to receive input ab ut the proposed ordinance. Written comments will be received by the Commission through Friday, February &. Following a11 pu lic input, the Commission will be considering whether ta adopt the ordinance as recommended or in some amended farm. The ptzrpose dec'de what, if hea ing record. pre ent for the iss Wor 1. im gen pra tat as Par eco f ro �.� pol tha of having this beEore Council. this evening is to any, comments we wish to enter i.nto the public Our MASAC representative, Bernie Friel, will be discussion. . As we are all very aware, aircraft noise is an �n-going issue nd Minneapolis-5t. Paul, and has become a majar palitical e in the metrapolitan area and the State. The Noise Budget ing Graup apparently cansidered numerous alternative ways of ting and eventuall� reducing the total amount af naise being rated around MSP. The result of their efforts is the attached osed ordinance, which would cap arid �equentially reduce the 1 noise produced. This is in lieu of other approache�, such iniitzng the number of operatians in and out af the airport. of the theory af the noise budget is that it wzll create an omic incentive for airlines to quicken the pace of' converting Stage II aircraft, to the quieter Stage III aircra�t. Pages 3-6 af the attachment out2ine the specific public y questians the Commission would ].ike to have addressed by testifying at the public hearing. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Staff has identified three issues that we believe would be of particular concern to the City of Mendota Heights and its residents. Those are: �' l. Conversion to State III aircraft - Notwithstanding the incen ives crea�c�by the noise budget for conversion to State III aircraft, what is the financial capability of the airlines to make such conversion, and the production capabilities of aircraft manufacturers to deliver new Stage III aircraft in a timely fashion. 2. Distributional Equity - Question No. 4 in the attached concerns t e oh'�ective of the Noise Budget Working Group to increase "distributional equity" of noise impacts around the airport, but the failure of the noise budget ordinance as proposed to directly address that objective. In particular, we may be interested in commenting on the extension of runway 4-22, which would create more ability to send aircraft south and southwest of the airport. Historically, Bloomington, Burnsville, and Eagan have opposed this extension, in the belief that it would create new noise impacts in their communities that were never anticipated when they went about their land use regulations. Eagan is affected because �lanes taking off in this direction will frequently be making a turn to the east after reaching a given altitude. 3. The "Slot S stem" Alternative - The fourth from the last pagein �he�he ocument is a statement by Minneapolis Councilmember Steve Cramer urging a slot system approach as a viable alternative to the overall noise budget. In other words, rather than regulating the amount of noise generated at the airport, this approach would allocate the number of takeoff and landings which could occur. This approach may have some appeal to Mendota Heights, in that by limiting the total operations at the airport, the protected over-flight corridor on the Mendota Heights/Eagan border remains more viable. Under the noise budget approach, as airlines switch to State III aircraft, they will be allowed more flights in and out of the air�ort. Increased traffic makes the protected corridor concept increasingly obsolete, and although the aircraft would be quieter, they might increasingly have to fly over residential areas of Mendota Heights and Eagan for safety reasons. As a side note, the airlines�refused to the Noise Budget Working Group, and the Administration participated only as an the airlines and the FAA have indicated participate in Federal Aviation observer. Both that if the CITY OF MEN�OTA HEIGHTS MEMO Airparts Commission adopts the noise bud�et ordinance, they wiil challenge i� as an unconstitutional restriction on interstate commerce. ACT QN REQUIRED rep wis att :� Council should discuss� this i�sue with staff and MASAC sentata.ve Bernie Friel, then adopt whatever comments it s to have entered inta the public hearing record. :madZr , -� �� M" rr:" ' �I� :I:d' ' ��' �. " �.' . t� :�!f tt:tir i," i t F M' Mi.nneapoli�-Saint Paul Metropolitan Airports Camiissir�n (Gcmnission ) duct a PubLic Heari.ng in Janu�-�ry 1987, as detailed be3ow, to r�ceive from all interested persons concerning a Draft Noise Budget Ordinance b�een proposed for consideration by the Cc�nf.ssion: 4, Wednesday, January 28, 1987 MAC Gen�ral c3ffices 6a40-28�h Av�nue South Minneapolis, M3 55�50 he public hearing shall be held fram I:00 P.M. - 5:30 P.M. and frocn 7:00 - 11:00 P.M. Additional sessions will be scheduled and promptly announced appears that ail persons interested in being heard in person cannot be ately heard during the time allotted for the two sessions announced above. Ccxmnission's Operarions and Environm�nt�.1. Co�amittee shall serve as the Officer: A certified stenvgrapher will be present to record all p�o- and to pr�aare a transcript far Ia.ter considerati.c�n by the Cca�rmi.ssian. Stlbject Matter of Heatin�gs . t the Jarntary 198? Public Aearing �he C�snni.ssion wiZ3, receive aral tes�t�.- mony and/or cvritten te�tiaxany or statem�nts concerning the Draft Noise Budget Ct ' ance, as more fully de.scribed .in t31e background �.terials li�ted below, �hat has been draEted by the Noise Budget Working GrouQ �stablished �y the C 'ssion. s more fuLl.y detailed in the backgraund materials for the Public Hearing, the urpose of the Ordinance would be to reduce ar cap tize amount of aircraft noi �o�sure e�rienced in co�nities close to tYle MSP Airpor�. o further focus public c�nent at Ghe Public Hearing, the Ccnmi.ssion has iden ified four primary issues nn which it would request c�urnuzity. industry �nd gov t agency view�. These are set forth in the Attachment to tha.s Notice of P lic Hear�.ng. � _.« .�,. _.• ,.. - �. -.. - .. , capy of all bac•kground reading ma�erials is includ� wi�h this l�otice of Publ c Hearing, has been mailed to all knc�m interested �arties, and is avai able for gublic inspection in the Gatun.ission's G�eral Offices. Individual �� capi s will alsa be mailed upon re�u�st to any person. background dac�.urnnts ace: .. Draft Noise Bt�ciget 4rdinance and Technical A�pendix: ' , Sium�uy of Provisions of Draft Noise Bttdget Qr+3i.nance ; �� 3. Report of Noise Budget Working Groug (Decn�nber 1986) - Pablic Inforasation Meetings To assure that those wishing to co�ment on the Draft Noise Budget Ordinance 'nave adequate opportunity to have any technical questions answered well in advance af the Public Hearing sessions, the C�¢nission's staff and �-�chnical consultants will be available to answer those questions at three Pub1i� Information Meetings, to be held as follows: 7:30 P.M. - 10:00 P.M. Wednesday eveniag, January 21, 1987 Pilot Rnob Fle�nentary School 1436 Lone Oak Road Fagan , N�I 7:00 P.M. - 9:30 P.M. Thursciay evening, Janu�ry 22, 1987 Noicomis Ca�minity CPnter 2401 East �ti.nnehaha Parkway Minneapolis. NIDI 7:00 P.M. - 9:30 P.M. Thursday evening, January 22, 1987 Richfield Co�uainity Center Corner of 70th and Nicollet Richf ield, N�7 In addition to the above Public Information Meetings, the Conmission's staff and technical consul�ants will be available to provide briefings to local officials, any airlines serving or interested in serving the `�SP Airport and State and Federal officials (FAA Regional and Headquarters offices, U.S. Departsnent of Transportation ) so that all inter2sted parties can be fu11y informed concerning tize draft Ordi:iance in advance of the public hearing. - Pzocednres for Participatiag in Pablic Hearing Persons desiring to make oral statesnents and presentations are requested to advise the Coamission's staff in advance to assist in the scheduling of par- ticipants by calling yis, Judith Smith at (61.2) 726-1892 during business hours. A11 written submissions shall be presented to the Chair at the hea'ring or filed with the Ca�nission at its General Offices, 6040 28th Av�nue South, Mi.nneapolis, Minnesota 55450, not later than Friday, February 6, 1987. The Ccx�nission will maintain a register of written submissions at its Ges�eral Offices and all su.ch submissions will be available for public inspection inme- diately upon receipt. Mr. Jeffrey W. Hamiel Executive Director N1E'IROPOLITAN AIRPORTS CONi�+IISSION 6040-28th Avenue South Minneapolis, 1�I 55450 1/7/87 � � �� D c�n ai Noise ix�Os their addit for n T the G G�oup suffe must �I i de a no` � � - 3 - ISSU�� INVOLVING DRAF"I' NOSSE BiJDGE',� ORDINANCE CN WSICH PUBLIG COi�MII�T IS REQUE.�r"I'ED AT JA[�NAR,Y 19$7 PUBLIC AEARING ,,... . ►• -- _. ..-,. - ..- ... .. . .. ._ ..�. .- . ... -. _ .a _ - - • .,. . - . . ;.c�.. - . _ . . . . .�. : :. SCUSSION: No major airport in the IInited Statas has an absolute ceili.ng line aircraft noise, �uch as has be�...si praposed £or MSP as nart oE the Budget Dzaft Ordinance, AI1 other major U.S. com�nercial aiz�qorts that � restrictions on airport use to mi.nimize the aircra�t noise �a�ure of citix�s allow some future increases i.n to�al noise energy by airlines in on �o encouraging sub�titution of quie�er aircraft ("StagA 3 aircraFt") �isie.x aircraft { "Stage 2 aircraft" } , = Cannis�ion's ct�rehensi.ve 27-part noise abatement program subnutted to �ernor i.n April 1986 as well as the Report of �he Noise Budget Working tDecember'1986} make a convinci.ng case that the levels of noise expasur� :d by many residents of the M5P me�rapolitan. ar�a are unacceptable and e r�duced. . is i.nterested in mi.ning whether grc�ath at se budget mechanism. an �=� ca�rment �.n air camierce at NSP should be constr Ss t�ae particu.2ar 'aoi�e ene�gy" restzictioiz re�r�ded by the Working ar�prapriate mr�chanism �or capQing the am�unt of ai.rcraft noise th�.t can d�► aislf.ne aircr�ft� serviaq 1�5P aai far aLlcca�.ing � ti�e pezmi.ssible aircraft noi. e energy eqaitably to ind�.vidnal ais carriers? 2SCUa5I0N: The Wo=king Groua recomnended a"naise energy" restriction from :�ome 16 alternative noise budget mechanisms. The Ccxmu.ssion i.s interested in pub c cam�nent on �he rec�nded nozse budget m�chanism. the methodal.ogy �or m�a ing noise en�ergy, and whether the draft ordinance allocates "noi,se energy" to ''vidual airZines fairly and without un�ust discriminatzon. J. a. Shon3.d any initial cei2ing oa fntIIre airline aircraft �aoise ttfi��at is :�et part o� a Noise Buc�get C�arri; �.*� iaclUde: (1) � I8$ red�Gtio� 3.a no.ise Gnetqy f�'Cm Aiagt2st I986 IGv��s� as hy a mr�jority acE the Noise Hndget Wo=i�ing Groc�; ar f2) an 113 rednction in noise energy f=cm Auqast 1986 levels, as by a minority of the Hoise B��dget Wor�Cing Growp; or {3� af Oz�clinance tt�s ter} ; or , {4} ti�e carrent airline a3.rcraft noise 2ev�ei at tia� of �,doption (no rednctian in cazreat noise level.s bnt no futnre i.ncre.ases ,�. - -..� ._ . «. -,- .. ,_. _ .�.,,-...-. . I .. . . . . . _.. . : . . . . : - 4 - • •_ �+s..� ' sr�s. •r.t�' �.' _tao_..= • •^ •- - - • •.- • • r ur+ �• •.• • � +�.. - • • • � • o.- DISCUSSION: Under its en�-�,bling legislation �C must promote air navigation and air co�nerce while assuri.ng the residents o� the '�ri.n Cities r�tropolitan �.rea tize minim�n �virorimenta7. ia�.ct fram ai.rcraft c�erations . I�,G is int�restt�„rd in the views ot all commentators on the prvposed level of noise energy reduc�,.i.on, both in terms of its pat.e�tial benefits ta communi�es adja_ cent to the Airport and i�s likely impacts upon air service at MSP and'the indi- vidu�i.s and businesses tlzat rely �on air a�n�rce. - Pote�tial Environa�ental I�mroves�.=nt The bac�cground c�cu�nts indieate that the Noise Budget Woricing Group set its oroposed ceiling on future Ieveis of airline aircraEt noise energy to equal �veraged actual noise �nergy levels produced during all of 1984 (majority) or duri.ng the "apen window season of 1984" {mi.nori�y) . The Worlci.ng Graes� agreed that a return to 1984 noise Ievels wr�uld, based � upon communit�i sensitivity surveys that were undert�ken and its study of �.he pat�ern of increasing noise c��laints over a number of years, result in a c�aningful and measurable im�rov�rient in th� curren� �vironrrn,nt for many area residents. Environmental benefit� may also be measured i.n terms of "before and after" ca�arisons o� noise contours, numbers of z�aple exposed to thre�hold levels of cumulative noise energy, and numbers of minutes per day that various loca- tions in the metropolitan ar�a would be im�acted by higher than �hresh.hold noise levels. Thus, the Commission solicits �he views of 311 m.snb�rs o�E the public on how it should �asure i.u��avesn�rt in the rn�li�v c� �-hP ��T� �s� �_�-�-�.,��'_ '-'~� wheth�r the - Patential Imgacts Upon A:i.r Ccc�rce Rs the background docuz�nts note, fihe 18� reduction in noise energy recom rnended by the�Noise Budge� Wor�ing Group as a ceiling for a11 aircraft noise �o be produced by the ai.rlines could involve a potentia]. reduction of 56 tak�-off%Ianding cycles ger c�ay of a typical ai=Iine aircraft {8-727-2�0} at iKSP as e�ared with Augu�t 1986 activity level�. That level of reduction was re�omrnnded to provide meaningful rel.ief to cammrsni�ies near the airport that �re currently e�eriencing unaccep�ble levels of noise. In contrast, the Co�ni.ssion's staf� and two other mesnbers of the Working Graup recommended in their minarity views �hat the 18$ raiuction was too deep, would be difficul� if not i�c�ssible for some airlines tn meet and would lessen need�d economic develapment in the metrwolitan area. They recammended an 11� reduction in noise energy fran August 1986 Ievels, a pa�ential reduction of 4i t�-off/landing cycles per day' o� B-727-200 aircraEt as comnared with August 1986 activity Ievels. �� rative numb�rs of airline aircraFt c�era�ions under both aptions are in the Summary of Noise Budget Draft Ordinance, one o£ the available 3 c3,a-u�nts . � A third apti.on available ta the C�mission wbuld be to freeze naise energy as of the dat2 of its action on the �Toise Budget Ordi.na,nce (scheduled :EQr April 1987 } ar so� other siunilar date that would not i.nvolve cutbac.ics in nc�ise ener fram the then-current activity levels of the airlines. �` �he to �e detailed im�act of t,his third option is unknown since the Carani.ssion 't yet have the Spring 1987 sch�dules o�' any airline, and particularly �e there is no helpful, historical data �rom Spring I986 for the newZy cam- Northw�est-�epub 1i.c . �ause the proposed noise budget mechanism deals directly with "noise " as appased ta ai.rcraft vpera�i.ans, it �.s difficult to predict precisely �act of a particular "noise energy" restriction on ai.r service. Ability stitute qui.eter �tage III aircraft for e�.sting Stage ZI aircraft is a on af nuz�rous ecoriomi.c and c�aerational factors, such as an air carrier's ng fleet mix, route structure, and Iong lead ti.nne for puzchasing new 1 is i.nterested i.n de�ernu.ning in rnare detail the pot�tiai effect af the noise budget ordinance on air carrier ac�ivi�y at MSP and whe�her the ordinance i� 1' Z�r to resuit in r iac�nt of noisier Stage II aircr wz. Stage III aircraft, as c�o�ed to a r uction in av 1 r rvice. In the even a r ucts.o �.n a r s�rvice appears likely, the Ca�i.ssion r��sts the views of co�mentators cm the potential irr�act of such a reduc�ion i.n air service on th individuals and businesses whic3i use �he �,i.rport. Finally, the Cr,�nni. sion is interested in the views of aIl camtinta�ors as �o whether the poten 'al impacts upon air transportation and air com�rce appear��scessive in Iigh of �he potential noise attenuation benefits, (PRS A2t�o�tgh �e t�c�ise B�dget Wor.�ir�g �'+� set "c3istribxttionaZ equity' of impa,cts throaqhont the metroQolitan area as a co-eqaal abjective with 2 noise reci�c;tio�a►, the prc�as�,+d Noise Bndqet Ordi�acsce v�.II not achieve �bjective. Shonld the Cammission aov� press its Rnnv�y 4/22 E�sion �t or otber me.asu=es to iacrea.se� nse of the Prefere��,iai Runaray Syste�n �at�d thas ezeate "distribntionaa,l: eqctity" or wait nntil I9$8, as the Woricir.� majoritg reccameac3r�3, to ccnsider cther q t aas at that t.ime� , SCUSSIONr The Working Gro� recognized that the sizable increa�e in n s of aircraft operations at the airport si:zce a.i.rline de.regulation has prec FAA's Air Traffic Control Tawer personzzel from oftp� using �he air- �` port's Preferential Runway System {Pl2S} �ha� had been so successful in earlier year in preventing unaceeptable concentrations of aircra�„Et n�ise. Worki.ng Grouo adopt�ci a goal to increase daytime t6:00 A.M. - L1:00 P.M.} use of the PRS to an annual average o� five to six hours per day so as to caus "distri�+utional equi�.y" of noise ia{�acts within the metropol.itan area. is clear, howeve=, from t.he Woricing Group's Renort that the draEt Noise Ordinance proposed for Cc�snission action will not accc�mplish that objec- �� tive. F'urther, the Working Group failed to specifically endorse any alter- native prc�posal to achieve the objective of greater PRS use but urged that the CcRmission annually assess progress made to that end in implesrn�ting the Noise Budget Ordinance. S�nlemental co�nents by two m�nbers of the Working Grout� '� urged that the Cnc�mission be prepared to take Purther action as early as 1988 . to achieve greater PRS use. z The Catmission's staff has maintained in its separate conaneats in the Working Group's Re�ort that the ?xtension of Runway 4/22 at the airport, as already included by the Cor�mission as part of its comprehensive 27-part noise abat�rn�t program, could increase the canacity of the PRS by 20-30 operations per hour and would move substantially toward 3chiev�nent of distributional equity • The Canni.ssion seeks co�nunity and industry uzput as to whether its aoproval of a Noise Budget Ordinance ought to be conditioned ugon simultaneous approval of the proposed runway extension so that the Working Group's objective of distributional Pquity can be achieved within the foreseeable future. Paul L=^ �r — �/�/a� Y�M,��.��) U+ t� � N;i{�;d4^. cRan� r�o. ss 4rdinance tr� prarote and conserve the public s�fety. health, peace, venience and w�lfare by i.�osing a ceiling on the �otal amount of �craft noise that ai.r carrier� may produce at �ea�olis-Saint 1 International Airport, as an equitable balance betweesi the needs air cocmnerc,� and economic development. 3nd the e�vironcn�ntal �tectian af area resident�, and to provide for the progressi.ve ering of that noise ceiling c�ver time; to provide for �he �,;table ocation of that total amount of allawable aircraft noise energy ng all categories aE air carriers in a manner that pramote� car�peti�ion ng air carriers and encourages the use by air carriers of quieter craft; to r�►�; re periodic r�ports from ai.r carriers concerning nned and actual vperations; and to prescri',�e penalties for the Iation of this t�rds.nance. ,�S the Me�ropolitan Airports Cc�mission is obligated unde= i�s and statutory authority to determine in �he public interest the prc�er betwe�n the metrapolitan area's need for adec��a,te air navigation and tation services and facilities and the Ccxc�nission's abligations to the residents of the area from adverse environmental izt�ac�s as �11 as ng itse3f �ram legal liability resulting fram eXcessive levels of noise; and �tEP�S the Cammission has, since the advent af �et aircraft, undertaken a nuing series af programs and actions designed to mi�igate the noise �s o.� air transpartation on comrnusities adjacent to the Minne�polis-Saint International Airport ("�irport"), but the increased airline activity generated in the deregula�ed airline indus�ry has caused aircraft nai.se �o w perceived by area residents as a greater probl�n than before; and as the abat�nent programs previously developed by the Ca�ni.ssion no Zonger are ate �o ma.tigake the naise probl�n, a more comprehensive and aggressive ach is necessary and is now being �3ken to control aircraEt noise ir�acts; F�,S in January I986 the Governor's Task Force on Aircraft Noise r nded �hat the Cc�mmi.ssion adapt a"noise l�udget ordinance" for the Ai rt; �hereafter the �tet=opo2itan Aircraft Sound Aba�ement Council t"MAS�"7 rec to the CaRmission a canprehensive program of noise abatement es for inclusion in �he Cc�cussion's Federal Aviation Administration FAR Part 150 Noise Canpati.bility Program also incl�Iing a noise ordiizance tha� would .,� red e noise energy produced at the �i=port and would �"noise allc�cations" at t reduced level of noise energy available to va=ious airport users; and ther ter the Canmission in April 1986 adopted and submi.tted to �he C�overnor of Minn sota at hi.s request a 27-point program af noise aba�ement measures, incl ' g 3n evaluation of the feasibility of such a noise budget ordinance; and S the Wc>acking Group �hat �tudied �,he feasibility of the noise 1�udget at �he z�quest of the Coami.ssian, after comparing a large number of -2- alternative measures against the Working Group's dual objectives of (1) werall noise reduction and (2) more equitable distribution of noise to various oom- munities surrouncling the Airport, concluded that a noise 'oudget ordinance was feasible and in its Final Report (Dec�nber 1986) proposed such an ordinance for the Co�nission's consideration; [and ...] [WHgtEAS the Caa�nission, having reviewed the Final Report of the Wqrking Group has concluded that adoption of a noise budget ordinance properly balances the public interest and need for air navigation and transportation with the Ccnmission's potenti3l legal liability and its statutory responsibility to assure the residents of the Minneapolis/St. Paul metrapolitan area the minimum environmental ina�act fran air trans�ortation. ] NOW, THEI2EFORF, the Metrapolitan Airports Catmission does ordai.n: SDCTION 1 - DF.�'INITIONS . The following words and phrases when used in this Ordinance shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section: 1.1 AIR CARRIII� - any entity conducting or prc�posing to conduct operations at the Airport pursuant to a certificate to conduct air transportation s�....rvices in accordance wi.th 49 U.S.C. 1371, 1372, 1375, 1386, 1387, and/or 13�8, and/or any other applicable provision of law by which such entity may conduct cocm�er- cial air transportation services. Any group of Air Carriers servi.ng the Airport that is subject to more than 50 percent c�wnership or control by a single e�tity shall be collectively de�.sneci to be a single Air Carrier for pur- noses of noise allocation under this Ordinance. 1.2 AIRPORT - Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport - Wold- Chamberlai.n Field, a public airport under the supervision, coeration, direction and control of the Coc�nission, and.locat�.t�d in the County of HenneAin and State of �linnesota. 1. 3 AVF�tAGE DAILY NOISF �ZGY ( p,DNE )- The total noise energy expressed in units of �NdB produced by takeoff and landing cycles of Air Carrier aircra�t for an average weQlcday, during a soecified time pericd �nd calculated in accordance with the Appendix. . . 1.4 COi�itSSION - The Metropolitan Airports Cannission, s�metimes re:Eerred to as the Mi.nneapolis-Saint Paul Metropolitan Airports Co�nmission, 3 DL1bI1C cor- ., noration and age�cy of the State of Minnesota. Wher� Conmission ��roval, r_on- sent or action is required or permitted by *lzis Ordinance, such action m�y be taken by the Catmission's �ecutive Director except where such delegation is specifically limited. 1.5 CCY�LI.�NCE R�OFtTING PFRIOD - One of seven monthly or multi-monthly time periods used to determine whether an Air Carrier has exceeded its ADNE � pure _3_ 3tion, as ,follaws: May, J'une, July, August. Se�t�1nber, tactobe.r, and ber - Apr fl. .6 �"F�iItTE PF�tCE2VID NC?ISE T�EVFL MEASURED IN 17f7CIBELS tFPNdB) - A re of aircraft noise asse�sm�nt, used for ai.rcraft noise certification in ederal Aviation Regulation Part 36, to apprws.un�3te human annoyance in nse to ai;craft ilyover noi�e that is coc�uted from sound pressur� Ieveis red in o�ctave or one-third octave frequency bands with correctian f3ctors nting for;the dura�ian of the noise event and for the pres�ce af audible tones or discrete £re�qur�ncies. .7 Il�7Cti�II�iT ALR CARRIIl2 - An air carrier that is conducting ai=cra.Et vper tions at the Azrpart at the time it res�sts an allocation of nQise energy from the Caimission. i ,8 NEW FI�F,�RANT AIR CARRIER -�n air carrier that is not conducting any airc aft c�perations at the Aa.rport at the ta.me it requests an allocation of � nois energy from the Conmission. � . 9 TAREOFF AND r.,,AND2NG CYCLE - A co�rtbination o� a t��o�f {departuxe ) and a 1 ding (arr� va1.3 of an aircraft operated by an Air Carrier at the Airport. .IO T75E FEE At�tEt��S - Agre¢.ssents between the C�nmission and Air Carriers and e military by which both are charged fees for the use of p�ablic runways, ta�, ys, aprons and other publi.c facili�.i.es at the l�i.rport to defray in part the st o� develc�ment, maintenance and operation thereof. ( AI7i by .., the amo of 5DCTION� 2- LIMITATION CtT �PRODUCTION (�F AIRCRAFT NOISE HY AiR CARRIERS; RID[7CID NOI�E CEILINGS t7VEE2 'iIME; 1 ALL�C7CATIfJNS nF' 1�t0ISF, FNF,�tU"'Y. .I LSI�TATIQN t71+T AIRC�t��FT Nt�SSF �2GY � o Azr Carrier serving the Airport m�y conduct aircra�t takeoff and landing s that produce aircraft nai.se in excess of the Average Daily Noise Energy ) avai.lable to �he Air Carrier pursuant to this OrdinancP. I ' . 2.2 REDiJCED NOISE CEILINGS �"7V��t TIME (a) The total Average Daily Noise Energy tADNE) Ieve1 that may be praiuced iak�c7ff and Ianding cycles o� aIl Air Carrier ai.rcra£t at the Aimart as of date of implementation of this �rdiriance shall not e�eed 124.4b �NdB, the �nt of noi f e energy produced by airline aircra.Et duri.ng ca].enc3ar year 1984. tb} The total ADNE that may be prqduced by the takc_�ff and Ianding cycles �.l Air Cairier aircraft at the Airport a.�'ter J�ne 15 , 1990 , shall no� �d 124.27��Nd8, the ,�tmunt a� noise energy pra3uced by airline aircraEt .nQ the first six months of 1984. • - 4 - 2.3 ALLOCATIONS OF NOISE II�IERGY The Cannission shall allocate to each Air Carrier serving the Airport during any con�liance reporting period an amount af Average Daily Noise IIzergy (ADNE) in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. The ADN� level that may be produced by each Air Carrier as of the date of in�lesnentation of this Oxrlinance or thereafter may not exceed the total of its (�iaranteed ALlt�cation uncler section 3.2 or 4.2 and its allocation, if any, based on historical level of service under section 3.3. as increased or decreased by any transfers of noise allocations to or from other Air Cazriers pursuant to section 4.6(b). Determinations of ADNE energy levels for representative ai.rcraft and engines will be made by the Catmission and uniformly applied in i,-�plementing this Ordinance. SDGTION 3- INITIAL ALI,OCATION OF NOISE F�iERGY �.S rJF' DATE OF II�LII�irATION (�' ORDINANCE. 3.1 Il�]ITIAL ALLOCATIONS ( a) Not less than 60 da.ys in advance of the date of iaplesnentation of this Ordinance, the Comnission shall allocate to each Air Carrier that wi.11 serve the Airport on that date an amount of Average Daily Noise �ergy (�DNE) equal to its Gu�ranteed Allocation under section 3.2 and its allocation based on its historical level of service under section 3.3, as identified in each Air Carrier's initial Rec�uest for Allocation of Noise F,nergy as submitted to the Cannission pursuant to section 4.1. (b) In addition, prior to the aoplication of section 3.3 the Co�mi.ssion shall reserve an atrount of available ADNE to orovide for additional G�aranteed A]locations for potential new entrant Air Carriers that the Co�nission estima- tes may coc�nce service on or within 180 days following the date of implelnen- tation of this Ordinance and for additional G�aranteed Allocations for incumbent Air Carriers. 3.2 GUARAI�PrEm ALLOCATION All Air Carriers c�erating at the �i.rport submitting a Request for All.ocation of Noise Energy are entitled to a G�aranteed ALlocation sufficient to allow the folle7wing aircraft takeoff and ].anding cycles: (a) All international aircraft takeoff and landing cycles conducted our- suant to a bilateral agre�t to which the United States is a party, and where either the takeoff or the landing is at a foreign point, or, for foreign Air Carriers, where a flight segment is a continuation af a flight that begins and ends at a foreign location; and (b) All ai.rcraft talceoff and landing cycles conducted pursuant to the U. S. Der�ar�tment of Transportation' s Fssential �,i.r Service (FAS ) Proqram or 3ny suc- cessor program.authorized by federal law; and .� • natio Daa.Iy � the 3.1 at th / Atu�s ✓ 3.2. t : ) ?�s many aircraft �ai c�oerations or' EA�S Nois� F�er {?�DDI�TE} . s � takeaff and landing cycZes, other � fo= inter- cpera�i.ons . as do not e�cceed 146 . S6 �NdB in Average • �, a�s *, :a ��- a� �; a- � less than 60 days before the date of implementation of this mmissian 'shal�. allocate all ADNE re�nai.ning after appl.ica�,ion and 3.2,to Air Carriess in proportion fio each Air Carrier's of service, based uQon the Air Carrier's share af �ota7. seats Airport ,for t:akeoff and Ianding cy�Ies of scheduled air�raEt I986 ,�ciuding t�3u.3off and Ianding cycles guarant...�ed under 3 and {b �. Maricet shares wi1.1 be based upon I.atest avail.a�►le ment af T.ransportation data concerning weighted average seats ft {see Table in Appendix). �+ �•.- • - ��. ..� •• � �- Ordinance, caf sections historical available during sectiorz U.S. in airline � - ta) At�y allacation of ADNE under section 3.1(b) that is not required for Gw�r te�.�d Allocatians under section 3.2 may be madF► available by the C ' ssion to zlir Car.riers for tc�,.,c�aorary use on the same basi� as in section 3.3. j � b� Tec�orary use af �ueh rioise �tergy by such Air Carrier will �d not mare than siYty day� after that Air Ca�crier receives notice £rom the C,amtission that the naise"en�sxgy it is using �nporarily is needed for additional Guar teed ?�llacations for other Air Carrie=s. 1 as S�7CrIC?N 4{ - REQIIIRIIMF'.,NT5 FQR R�QUF.STING, U�ING AND 'IRANS'F�'�RR.ING � NOIa�E AL�CATIONS. .1 REQUESTS FOR ALTAC:ATION C3E' NC?ISE �3�1FiRGY f al Each A.ir Carriar reqniri.ng an al.iocation of ADNE frcxn the Cc�nmi.ssion , submi.t a Requ�st Eo= Allccati.an of Naise Energy not less than 75 days in ce of the' date 4E implementation of this 4rdinance or, if sub�nitted af ter, of � the da�e of' an Air Carrier' s pl3rin�:d initial operation at the �rt or of anY P.roposed change in the amount o� its ADNE all.ocation . 'ach Air Carrier �hall previde, i.n additic�n, a certification that its sche- of planned t�k�off and Ianding cycles for the relevant compl.iance ting periad Cor part thereof ) will not exceed its r�,Ast,.,�d allocation of This submission shail, also include sufficient i.nformation, in such form e Ccnmissian shall determine, cancerning the Air Carrzer's prvposed average � numbers �of ta,keoff and Ianding cycles and types of aircraft ta �ermi.t the ssion to iverzfy the acct�racy of the Air Carrier's certificatioa. � .2 AS5i3Et� GUAR ,' .� ALLOCATIQNS FOR NEW �l'L'ftAl�iT �IR � CARR2ERS �'� To prarote adequate camr�tition in air service, the Cc�mission shall allo- cate to each Air Carrier desiring to serve the Airport during any ca�liance reporting period an amount of ADNE equal to its Guaranteed Allocation under section 3.2. 4.3 TINiFLY RESPONSE BY CONMISSION � The Coc�nission shall respond to any ti�ly Request for Allocation of Noise Energy not later than 60 days before the Air Carrier's plan is scheduled to take effect. 4.4 NO FEF'JS Il�OSID FOR NOISF ALLOCATIONS Except as provided in section 5.3, the Ccnmission shall not ia�ose any fees or charges on Air Carriers for allocations of ADNE beyond the charges already included in Use Fee Agre�rn�ts or in other contractual agre�nents with Air Carriers, or pursuant to Cccnnission Ordin�nces as the sat� may from time to time be amended. 4.5 REQUIRII�ITS FGR R�R U5E C�' NOISE ALIACATIONS Air Carriers allocated noise energy must use those allocations on a regular basis (not less than 65$ of permissible aircraft takeoff and landing cycles during each 60-day period) or be subject to their unused allocations being withdrawn by the Catmission for reallocation. 4.6 TRANSFERS OF I�TOISE ALI,OCATIONS (a) Guaranteed A1locations of ADNE under sections 3.2 and 4.2 may not be leased, assigned or otherwise transferred by any Ai.r Carrier. (b) Noise allocations other than Guaranteed A.11ocations under sections 3.2 a,nd 4.2 may be leased, assigned or otherwise transferred, in whole or in part, by Air Carriers for any lawful consideration. Requests for transfers af noise allocations �nust indicate the dollar value (actual amount or fair market value of other consideration) placed on the noise allocation transaction by the Air Carrier parties. Transfers of noise allocations betwe�n Air Carriers shall become e�fective when the Catmission notifies the Air Canier parties that it has recorded the transfer. A record of each transfes shall be kept on file at the Cc�mi.ssion's offices and shall be made available to the public �on reasonable request. In any enforc�rient proceeding the Co�mtission's records concerning the a�munt of , noise energy allocated to any Air Carrier shall be controlling. SFJCTION 5- WITf�RAWAL AND F�PIRATION OF NOISF ALL�OCATICkTS . a 5.1 WITHI7RAWAL �' NOISE �LLOCATIONS FOR (�1USE u�e the _�_ a) Noise ailocations may be withdrawn by the Can�nission for insu�ficient section 4.5), for non-use of Guaranteed A1lacations or use far other �han urpose for which allxated {sections 3.2 and 4.2}, for �ceeding its ADN� ation during any cr�liance repc57rti.nq period or for �ailing to file reports red unde= this Ord:i.nanc:e in a�:irnely manner . b) Allocations will not be withdrawn by the Ccmnission until Carr' er has had an cz�portunity �o d�snons�rate to �he satisfaction C '�sion that good cause existed (force m3jeure, work stoppages, chan es, filing fo= protection under the bankruptcy iaws. etc.� fo non- e) of its noise allocation in a manner inconsistent with thi� Carr as s Ais Guar P�� ener ta.on .2 FURTHER WITf�RAWAI,S OF NOISE ALT.�OCATIONS an Air af t'�e ?CjlllpIfleA"k r it.s use tor c�rdinance . £ the Caz�mission concludes that total Guaranteed Allacations by all Ai= ers will �ceed the ADNE reserved by the Comni.ssion under section 3.1.(b?, �pleirn..nted by any amounts;of noi.se energy returned to or withdrawn �rom arriers, and that additional amoRints.of •ADNE are needed �or additional nteed All.ocations to provide the otapor�unity for ad�quate�Air Carzier ccm- ion at the-Airport, the Cannission shall periodically wi�hdraw noise y from ail Ai.r Carriers in, proportion to their �hen-curreszt AiDNE alloca- excluding Guaran�eed Allocations under sections 3.2 and 4.2. .3 k�IRATION �7E' NOISE AI,LACATIONS oise allocations awarc3ed pursuant �o this Ordinance shall not e�ire in ad ce o�' Januaryr 1989 wh� the CCttmi.ssiotl's Iong-�rm Use Fee Agre�mesits wi.th the scheduled Air Carriers will �aire. At its discretion, the Ccammission may all noi�e allocations beyond that date, allow th� to p.,.xpire in Jan ry I989, merge them into new IIse Fee Agrae3nents, or allc�cate th� by ordi- nanc . In any event, such agreemen�s or ordinance shal]. be struc�ured to achi ve the I24.27 �NdB Ievel of total ADNE by June 15. 199�. as .�CTiC�1 6 - CC?MPT�IANCE AND F�'�Ft.C�. .1 R�"PORTS �1 LTSE OE NOISE ALL,C'�ATION �t more �han 10 calendar days after the end of each compliance reporting , eac�s Air �arrier produci.ng more than 106,56 �NdB in ADNE during that ing period, and such other Air Carrie�s as the Ca�ni.ssion may specify, submit to the Ccx�nission a R�aort on iTse a� Noise Allocation setting any variances betsaea...n its schedul,e of planned +-.��f and landing cycles forth in its approved Recxuest for Allocation of Noise Enerqy and the ft �akeoff and Ianding cycles �ctuaily conducted during t%e ca�liance ing period just ended, anci the justification for any such variances. ►n Air Ca�ier"s ccx�li.ance report shall :mina�a.on as to whether the t�rdinance ha an Air Carrier does not docu�nt to the be considered an admissian in s been vio3ated. To �he e�nt satisfaction of the Cc�mission any tiza� - 8 - any noise energy generated in excess of its ADNE allocation vccurred as a r�sul of required aircraft diversions due to weather, aircraft mechanical difficulties. or other reasons beyond the control of the Air Carrier, that Air Carrier may be held to be in violation of this Ardinance. If a niolation is determined to hane occurred, the Air Carrier shall be subject to penalties being assessed and sanc- tions imposed. 6.2 MOrTI'I'ORING OF AIR CARRIER C',Ol�'�LIANCE � The Ca�nission shall monitor each Air Carrier's coc�liance with its noise allocation on an ongoing basis. Any �ir Carrier may be required to document at any time whether its pattern of aircraft c�perations to d,3te within a compliance reporting period will result in its exceeding its ADNE allocation for that reporting period unless'interim�changes in its existing pattern of takeoff and landing cycles are made. S�7CTIQN 7- PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS. 7.1 NlISDEMF'�ANt7R �,riy person (including a corporation, conpany, firm, partnership, or a joint stock associ3tion) vi.olating any of the provisions oF this Ordinance shall be punished by u�risoru�nt for not more than ninety ( 90 ) days or by fine of not more than sev�n hundred ($700.00) dollars, or both, for each such violation. Every instance of an �ir Carrier �xceeding its ADNE allocation during any compliance reporting period, any failure to file a r=quired ret?ort in a tiirnly manner, or any other violation of the prwisions of this Ordinance shall be dee�ned to be a separate offense. 7.2 tASS C}F' NOIS'F ALLOCATION I�ny Air Carrier that exceeds its ADNE allocation during any compliance reporting period or otherwise violates the provisions of this Ordinance shall be subject to loss of all or part of its ADNE allocation for such period of time as the Ca�anission after notice and c�portunity for hearing may determine. SDC'I'ION 8 - PE,TITIONS F'OR '�F3�ORARY �EN�'I'IONS . An Air Carrier may netition the Conmi.ssion for a te�orary "hardship" ex��- tion fran ccxnpliance with the allocation ceiling for that c3rrier. To r�ceivP an ex��tion, the Air Carrier must satisfy the Co�nission that it is unable to co�ly due solely to the composition of its existing aircraft fleet and (a) that it is unable to acquire alternative or additional aircraft that w�ould allow it to ca�ly with the Ordinance in a timely manner or (b) that through no fault of its own delays have occurred in the delivery oF quieter aircra.Ft or noise attenuation modifications to existing aircraft that had been purchased or contracted for, and that it is diligently pursuing a fle�t improvement proqram that, as evidenced by existing contracts. will allow it to achieve co�liance �'� with�the Ordi.nance on an alternative schedule that, given �he facts p=ese.nted by e Air Carrie.r, is satisfactory �o the Cannission. interested parties will be afforded the o�ortunity to coa�nt on the Aiz ier's peti.tion for a hardship e.xea�tion. The Commi.ssian its�lf t�nd not delegation) must grant or deny�, in whole or in part, +�.he hars3ship peti- tion wi.thin 21 days following the deadline for receipt of carments on -the geti- tion The Cc�ni.ssion may not grant any e��emptian that w3ives compliance with the 'nance longer than the mi.ni�rnum amaunt of time necessary for the Air Carr'er ti.o comaly and in no event may such a te�orary waiver �ceed one (I) year in duration. S"�CTiON 9 - SAVINC�S CLAUSE. � any oart, provision,.•or provisions of this.Ordinance shaLi be held to be �titutianal ar otherwise illegaZ, such unconstituti.onality` or illegality � not affect the validity of the remaining parts of the Qrdinance, and �.he �sion hereby declares it would have gasse�l the remaining parts of this nce i.n any event had it known �hat such par�, provision, or provisions be unenforceable because unconstitutional or illegal. � � + � a r • • i. r , � r i- �± • 's Ordi.nance shaL1, be in fuL1. �arce and take effect upon the filing o� the same wi.th proof af publication thereof wi.th the Secretary c� Sta� af the S�a�e af � esota. The date af implementation of this Ordinance shall be the �irst day the fzrst campliance r�orting peria3 that begins mare � 75 days aft the effective date of the Qrdinance, 1 •s - IO - APPII�DIX ZU DRAFr I�bISE BUDGET C�tDINANCE Methodology For Calculating Noise �ergy Of Air Carrier Aircraft Operations At Mirmeapolis-Saint Paul International Airport . The following materials describe technically the methodology that �rnust be utilized by air carriers in calculating the total noise energy ("Average Daily Noise �ergy" (ADNE)) for their Requests for Allocation of Noise �ergy that are to be submitted to the Ca�anission pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance. In addition, the Appendix includes tentative calculations by tne Cc�nission of estimated 311ocations of ADNE for air carriers as of the date af ia�lementation of the Ordinance. Specifically, formulas, or calculations resulting from the application of formulas, are included in this Appendix for: A. Average Daily Noise .Fnergy (ADNE) for all aperations of an air carrier during any ca�liance reporting period; and B. Allocations to air car=iers as of the date of in}�lementation of the Ordinance: 1, the total ceiling on ADNE that is to i�e allocated to air carriers; 2. the amount of ADNE that would be guaranteed ("Guaranteed ?�Ilxation") to incumbent air carriers continuing to serve the Airport; 3. the additional amount of ADNE that would be reserved for possible use by new entrant air carriers planning to begin sernice at the Aa.tport on or during the 180 days following �. the date of impl��tation; and 4. the apportionirn�t of the r�naining amount of ADNF to incumbent air carriers based on their historical levels of � service at the Aitport; and C. CQnversion of ADNE to Fc�,; valent �ircraft (B-727-200 ) tak�*�ff and ., landing cycles. �. CAT�[JLATION C�' �V�RAGE DAILY NOISE IIV�GY ( ADNE ) Average Daily Noise Fnergy (ADNE) to be requested of the Catmission in a RequPst for �1location of Noise Energy shall not e�eed the amount of ADNE that is available to an �.r carrier under section 2.3 of the Ordinance, computea as follows: B. �.� LOG [Ntm�er of Average We�kday Takeoff/Landing Cycles for Ai.rcraft 'I'yne A X Antilog (EPNdB per cycie for Airrra.�t A/10} + N� of Average WeQ�oc3ay T�ff/L�anding Cycles for Aircra:Et Typ� B X Antilog (EQNdB per cycle for Airc.raf t B/10 ). etc .� X 1.0 � ADNE '� This fon�ula invol.ves the foilawing steps: S� l. Determ:ine Noise Energy of Aircra�t Type. Determine from Table (attached) the noise energy that is produced �rom a single t�ceoffjlanding cyc3.e o� an aircra�t type .that an ai.r carrier plans to oQerate at the Airport during a compliance reporting • pericd; STF� 2, ComQute Average Daily Noise �iergy of Aircraft Type: �dd (by decibel. ac3d�.ti.an ) the noise energy for as many to�a3. cycles .of that aircraft type as the air carrier plan� to aperate during t..he total number of w��days during a cocmliance reporting period and divide that total by the n�r oF � actual wTeeItdays within ti�at reporting period; SI�EP 3. Cc�pute ADN'� for AZ1. Other Aircraft 2'ypes: Cccr�pute ST�S 1 and 2£or each other type of aircraft tha� the air carrier pl.ans to caperatc� at the Airport; and STF;1� 4. Ccm{�ar� Totals Against Carrier's ADNE: Deterini.ne that the planned operations of the air carrier as calculated unc�r STEPS l, 2 and 3 w+ould not exceed the air cazrier's total • . ADNE alic�w�,nce . Sampie calcuL3tions af ADNE for three air2i.ne �Iee� mi�s are shown in on E►.3, follawing. ALT�OCATI�NS TO AIR CARRIERS AS OF DAT� OF Ii'�LF.�SATIQN OF {7RDII�IANCE 1. TC7I'AL C�ILING 4N NOISE E�iERGY Th� initial ceiling on aircraft noise energy �hat may be produced by aIl t�k�+offJlanding cycl.es af aiI air carrier aircr�ft as of the date of implesrentation af the Ordinance is se�. at 124.46 �NdB. tiie fi.otal ave=aged nozse energy �raduced by air carrzer ai=cra�t during 1984. Z. °Q��'� �Tr�'A`I'�Q�.r7h `i� �'UM$�1'S The i24.46 EPNdB to�a]. ceiiing on noise energy tal is £irst reduced by 113.56 EPNdB, Qr 8.1$, ec�ual to the noise energy praduced in August 1986 by aircraft takea�fllanding cycles - 12 _ protected �rom reduction by air carrzers praducing Ie�s than 106.56 --� E�NdB (Guarante�d Alloc,ations); and (b) is then further reduced by , 109.1 EPNdB, ar 2.9�k, ec�ual. to the additional noise energy that could be pra3ucerl by incumbP�t air carriers wi.�hout exceeding each carrier' s 1.06 . 56 FPNdB G�aranteed Alloca�.ion for providing adeq,uate compe�ition. . 3. SETASII?E C�E' "GUARAN'S'EEU ALLOCATSQNS" Ft}R US� BY N�n7 F.�7'rRAN� AIR C.ARRIEftS The I24.46 EPNdB to�a3. ceiling is f5.nal.ly reduced by 111.44 �NdB, or 5$, ec�ual to the noise energy that could be produced by not Iess than three new entrant air carriers proposing to serve the Ai.rt�ort on the date of ixmlementation of the Ordinance or within the I80 days foZlow�.ng, and each using t� to its 1�6.56 EFNdB Guaranteed Allocation for providing adequ,�te com�tition. To determi.ne if planned tak�off/landing cycles of individual 3ir carriers wauld e�eed any carrier's Guaranteed A11,ocation of i06.56 �NdB (e�ccluding interna�.ional and �,S aperations), the general formula (see A., above? for calcu�ating total air carrier AUNE wauld be applied. -- Range of OQtions Availab2e to Vew �itrants The following e��les i.ndicate t�e wide range of options far a variable number of aircraft takeoff/ landing cycles that are available to a new entrant air carrier -- all within the Guarant,eed Allocation ca� 106.56 EPNdH: ta) Ai.rline A has 3 daily &-727-200 takeoff/ landing cycles. LOG [3 X Antilog (101.6/10)] X 10 = 106,37 �NdB (b) Airline B has 2 daily &-72'7-200, 7 daily NID-SO . . tr.�3ceofflLanding cyc.Ies. LOG [ 2 X Antilog { 101. 6/I.0 }+ 7 X Antilcag { 92. 8J10 }� X 1.0 � = 106.26 �NdB , (c) Airline C has 24 daily B-7S7-200 takeoff/ landing cycles. ., LOG l24 X Antilog t 92. 6/10 } J X 10 = 1�6 . 40 �'�IdB In the exau�les above, no airline wauid e�eed its Gur�ranteed Allocation of 106.56 EPNdB, even with large differences in the cor�osition of t-heir f3eets. The �DNE produced by the thr� B- . 727-200's of A.i.rline �1 is equivalent to �hat of twenty-�our B-757- 200's of A,irline C. C. an of � .� -- as 4. _ 1.3 _ • � • �� - a r r K • �,� • � T= _� «• - a�� r • :� r- �,- « The r�na,ining noise energy (a�ter above reductions for Guaranteed Allocati.ons �or any i.nternational. and �S c�erations ) ec�ual� 123.71 F�pNdE in ADNE and is allocated t.o i.nc�rbp..nt air carriers hased an each carrier`s prQportion of the tatal 45,275 daily sea�s flown at the Airport by ��]seaff/landing cycles of scheduled air carrier aircraft during �he base period {August 1986). (The number of sea;ts per �akeoff%landing cycle for i.ndividua.J, aircraft is obta.ined from the attached Table). Rawever, no air carrier would be allocated Iess than 106.56 EPNdB in rsoise energy under this fonnula. Sta�ed in terms caf a formula, the allocation to individual air carriers rel.ated ta their Ievels of historical service is a� follows» LOG [(Numb�r of Daily Seats Flown by Tak�.�ff/ t,anding Cycles of Ai.rune Al4sa�5 � x Antilc�g t1.z3, 7�/l0 )] x lo For e�crale, if Airline A flew 22,637 daily seats, or SO$ o� the tota7. airport seats in At�gust I986, its ailocation of the 123.71 EpNdB would be: T�OG [( 22637/45275 ) X Anti.log (123 . 71/].0 ) J X 10 = 120 . 70 EFNdB � CC�NiiEftSZ�JN t7�' ?�DN� � EQUL�L� AI.RCRA�'� TAitF.�JFF/`L�ANDING CXCLES ' The calculatS.on of ADNE r�„ res �he use uE Iogarithms and ilogarit',hm�s, concepts not always easy to cac�rehend. ThereFore, �-..he concept "Equivalent Aircra�t" is in�rodea,ced in this Apperzdix to allow use of basic thmetic to, more easily qu�i�.ify the n�r o� allowai�le �keo��/landing les for a given amount af ADN�'. . The '"�qu�.val.ent Aircraft" utilized fo= this calculation is the 8-727- . }he most caz�mn aircraft i.n use at the Airport and in the nation. The � e�erqy per t�akeoffjlanding cycle of the aircraft, 141.6 �NdB, is u�ed as seline azmun�, or 1.0 F��; valent �.i.rcraft. An aircraft which produces twice noise e�ergy, ar 104.5 FjpNdB, w�uld represent two F�quivalent Aircra�t. By gning a number of Frn� i val.ent Aircraf t cycles to each specif ic ADNE value , using the �'�:i.va3.ent �ircraft values for each aircraft tyoe listed in the e, a variety of aircraft mi.�s can be develapcd without the use af rithms. For exacnple : The 123.71 EPNdB to be allocated fi,.o incumbc�.nt air carriers represents I6 Equi.vaient A.zzcraFt t�keoffJianding cycles tZ23,7IJ14I.6, in Iogarith�ms}. - 14 - Using the Table, the 163 Frn,; valent Aircraft could be ccx�rised of the following numbers of takeoff/landing cycles for different aircraft types. , , .y (a) 163 8-727-200 (163/1.0 Fm�;valent Aircraft), (b) 1288 B-757-200 (1288/7.9 F�uivalent Aircraft), or � (c) 81 B-727-200 and 648 B-757-200 (81/1.0 Frn,;valent Aircraft + 648/7. 9 F.m,; valent Ai.rcraft) 0 , 1/ � TABLE Levels of �NdB for Airline Aircraft at MS'P and F�„vaJ,ent �i,rcraft F�Nc'iB per Takeoff/ Landing Cycle 2/ Dc-� Lo c,�rsn-�A� Dc-� �a tsr$�-�� Dc-s �o csrs�-z�y Mt}-8 {JT8D-219 ) 737 2U0 tJT8I}-ISQN} 737 300 {CFM56-38-2) B-72 -lOQ tJTBD--? � B-7 -240 iJT8D-lSQN) 74? 200 (�]T9D-7QA) 757 200 (PW 2037 ) DC- 0-40 (�T9D-20D) 767 200 (CF6-80A2) CV- 80 tASN501-D1.3D) F-2 -1000 tN�555-IS ) DC- -73 tCFM56-2-c1) 95 . S �Vy � 99.9 92, 8 99.3 93.9 100.7 101.5 1q3.0 92. 6 103.0 96.5 89.8 95 , 9 97.2 Equivalent Aircraf t {Based on �iergy af ane B-7a�-aao Takeoff /T.,,ax�.ding Cycle ) 2/ 3.8 �� .. s �.6 1. 7 5.9 1.2 i. o q.7 7.9 0.7 3.2 I5.1 3.5 2.8 Sea�s 3/ 83 �aa i24 144 11.3 132 117 146 395 185 269 I97 50 �a 200 � 1/ ' ls and engines shown re�resent most cocnnon types used in service at NSP and are standard for a11 calculations. No information is presente�d for regional air ine aircr�£t since it is �ected that no regionaS carrier wauld have in the for seeable future a total �,DNE that exceeds its I06.56 FPNdB Guarante�d ?�.71 ation of noise anergy. To obta:in data on ai.r carrier aircraft no� listed, con t the '�letrapolitan Aixports Caxmission. , 2/ aritiunic sum of F?�R Part 36 certifzcation tak�aff and laczding noise le 3.s, as p.resented in FAA PC-36-1D for m�imum takeof� and landing weights. C ' icated landing levels for a11 aircra�'t w�re reduc�:d by 6.6 EPNdB so that av age landing levels for rhe �i£tee� (15) aircr�t types shown equal 3verage P 36 takeoff levels. 3/ U. U,�. ats shown are w�ighted average by ai.rcraft type using CY I984 data, £ram Dcn, Aircra£t Operating Cost and P�+rformance Report. Weighted avprage wi.Il. be revised using CY J.985 seat data and Augus� 1986 fleet mix wtzen D� data is availabl,e. tat the r- �r' •• s �: r-• • � -M �� Intra3uction 'I'ise Draf t I�Toise Budget Ordinance descr'z'�ed in this Sua��.ry has been pro- � for the consideration of the i�Setropolitan Airports Caanission by a Noise et Warking Grouc of local gove=n�t of�icia�.s and coamuri.f.ty represex�- ves that was established by the Cannission �o detern�i.ne �he feasibilitq af "noise budget" methodology ta the a:i.rcra;Et noise situ,ation at the ;� eapolis-Saint Paul. International Airpor'�, � The Working Group canpieted its Final. Report in De�ember I.986 and submitted it d supglemental. docurc�nts to the Cammis�ion, In that Report, all but two s of the Working Group agreed on the general "noise budget" concept /but t� addi�.i.onal members felt that the degree of noise reduction praposed v in e Draft C}rdinance {see Section II.B., belaw) was too severe. That issue, among others, has be�..n raised Eor pubii.c cairc�nt in the ,ssion's Notice o� Public Heara.ng an the Drdit Noise Budget Ordinance, The c hearing will be he3.d at the Can�ni.ssion.'s ��eneral 4ffices on January 28, ' 198'� . z. �r��c�r � pcn�os� c� a�na� A. I Reduction and Allocata.on of Air Ca=rier Noise �ergy The "noise budge�" ordin�,nce provides a regulatory mechanism by which the r�oli� Airports Coanunission ( "Cancnission"} can: 1, estabiish a cezlirig on the total. aimunt of noise energy that can collectively be produced by' all the c�perations of all air carrier a.i.rcratt serving t11e Nii.nneapo3is-Saint Paul Znternational Airport ' t"Airport" ) after a cer�ain date t"date �of impl�nenta�i.on") ; and 2. equitably allocate that total �mount o€ permissibl.e nozse energy am�ang all classes af air carriers serving the Airport and among individuat air carriers for their use. This ceiling on aircraft noise protects the cozrcnuni.ty frc� any futuze ease� in noise caused by increases in air c�rrier aircra�t c�era�ions; over, the ove=all: rloise eeiling itself can be further reduced over time, Since an air carrier can substitute mare c�era�.ions of quieter aircraEt £o fewer aperations of noisier aircra,Et wi.thin its total allocation of noise en gy, �here is an i.ncen�ive ta the ai.r carrier and a benetit to the co�'rninity ' fr greater use of m�re quiet aircraft. B_ � Many Aircraft OQerations Exempted fram Orc2.inance � Many aircraft cperators at the Minneapolis-St. Paul internat.ianaZ �.i.rport d be ccxr�letely e��ted �rom the Noise Budget Ordinance or �heir opera- s{"takeoff and Ianding- cycles" ) while regulated by the Can�ni.ssion wou2d be reduced by` this Ordi.nance. � _Z_ Generally .5�eaking, genexal aviation aircraEt and public aircraft (awned b; the Federal Government or the State af Minr't�sota) are canpletely �npted since tizis draft Ordinance oniy regulates "air carrier aircraEt." Further, the noise %vels produced by regional (conmuter) ai.r2ines, by cargo and non-sch�c'Iuled air carriers and by all but six incumbent scheduled passenger-�arrying airl.ines {ar airiine com�anies) would nat be adversely affected by this drait Ordinance because their current shares of noise'e�ergy without any reductian are less than the mini�un alZocations of noise energy that WOLl].Cl � G�Ila.i�3ii� �I 31�: 31i C3ii'lEZS (°Guaranteed Allocation"% . While each category of ai.rport user is being required or encouraged to reduce the noisi.ness of their opeZations, these ab�ectives can be sin�czlta- z�eflusiy achieved through other element� in �he Cannission's April 1986 27-point program of noise mi.tigation measures and are no� at7prcoriate for i�lemen- tation through the mechanism o� a�laise Budget ardinance. II. MEASURIiQG AND ALLOCATING AIRCRAF'T NOISE �GY A. Establishing Units o£ Noi�e Energy Measurem��t The dra.�t Ordinance c�asures aircrait noise energy in ci,�cibels o� ef£ective perceived noise levels tEPNdBI (secti.on 1) which is a traditional single event measuring unit that is utzlized by the Federal Aviati.on Aciministration tFAA) in certi.ficating airline aircraft for noise purposes. All.ocations af noise energy {hereafter "average c3aily noise energy" (ADNE)} are to be given to individua7. airlines ("A.ir Carriers") in units of EPNdB produced by departures and arrivals {°takeoff and Ianding cycles"} of the aircraEt types that serve �he Ai�ctrt. The Appendix to �he draft Qrda.nance �plains the t�chnical basis for the noise measurements and for the formulas for allocating ADNE to individual a,ir carriers. {While naisier aircraft produce higher EPNd� levels, readers are warned that all calculations o.�. noise energy (other �han com�aarisons of relative "noisiness" of "Equivalent Aircraft" (see Table in Appendix) are logarithmic not arithmetzc and cumula�.i.ve totals af noise energy may be difficuit to understand.) B. F�stablishing Initial. and 1990 Noise Ceilings 1. r,awering Noise Ceilings Over '�ime The draft Ordinance establishes a total. ceiling of 124.46 EP1�kiB in ADNF for all ai.r carrier aircraft aperations tn�asured in tak�off and landing cycles} �ran its date af implementation unta.I June 15, 1990 (section 2.2). That ceiling w�ould innolve a reduction in noise energy o� 18� or 56 takeo�'f and landing cyeles af equivalent aireraft {8-72'7-200}, The cei].ing w,auld be further reduced to I24. 27 EPNdB after 7uns IS , 1.990 , by further 'reductions (if necessary) in allocatians of ?�DNE to air carriers. This would �regresent a c�,z3.ative 22� reduction i.r� noise energy from August 1986 noise levels, -3- Basis for Fstab].ishing Specific Noise Ceilings praposed initial ceiling is equal to the noise energy that was produced by ai line airczaft at the Airport during calendar year 1984, a base year in terrns of coc�minity-acceptable levels of aircraft noise �nissions. Based on analy is of rec�t sensitivity surveys of ine+-sapolitan area residents and of the ttern of increasing numb�rs oF recorded citizen comQi3ints about,aircraft noise over a numb�r of years, the draft Ordinance reflects the conclusion that a reduc 'on of total airline aircraft noise to 1984 levels would provide meaning- ful r lief to many area residents. ther indicators support �he proposed level o�f noise reduction. An 18$ reduc ion in noise energy would equal a retiuction of 24$ of total equivalent aircr t(B-727-200) takeoff/landing cycles as of August 1986 and would reduce the tal rnunber of residents e�posed to higher than acceptable levels of noise, based on changes in cumulative noise contours. draft Ordinance incorporates a further reduction in overal.l ai.rline airc t noise energy in 1990, providing a cu�ulative 22$ r�duction from actual � 1986 levels. C. Procedure for Obtaining A1Zocations of Noise Energy Any a.ir carrier planning to serve the Airport, either on the date of imple- r�n tion of the draft Ord.inance or thereafter, �st file a Request for A11 a�ion of Noise Ener with the Commission not later than 75 days before the im�l ntation date, the date thereafter oF initial service at the Airport by an air arrier, or the date of any proposed change in an air carrier's ADNF allo- cati n (section 4.1). That Request must contain sufficient information about the carrier's pl ed operations that the CoRmission can verify that the Ievel of apera�.ions pl ed will not exceed the air carrier's �DNE. The Comnission will respond to an'r carrier's timely request for an allocation of ADNE not less than 60 days oefo e the carrier's plan is scheduled to take e�fect (section 4.3). D. Categories af Noise Allocations An air carrier's total ADNE allocation may be comprised of up to thr�e dif- fer t categories of noise �ergy: Guaranteed Allocations, aLlocations i�ased on the air carrier' s historical level of service at the �i.rport, and all.oc3ti.ons tr sferred to it from other air carriers (section 2.3). . 1. �aranteed Allocations The draft Ordinance pstablishes a category of air carrier aircra,Ft or�era- s the noise energy for which is gu�aranteed ("�iaranteeci Allocation") and is not subject to being reduced although it is included within t,he overall e ceiling zequired by the ordinance. Guara.nt�+ed Allocations of ADNE cover raft c�erations mandated by the Federal Government (international flights Essential. ?�.ir Service f lights )( section 3. 2). � - 4 - In addition, 3 Guaran�eed Allocatian o� up �0 106.56 EPNdB in ADNE is pro- vi.ded by �he C:c�mni.ssion ta any air carrier serving or willirig� to serve the Airpvrt so that there will be atrcple opportunity £or coc�etitiv�e air services to be provided at the Airport {sectian 4,2}. This Gu�ranteed ?�1location of � will be adequate to provide a widP varie�.y of carrt�eting services. Within �hat ADNE. =or exa�mle, an air �arrier could provide 3 daily tak�aff/Zanding cycles of 8-727-200 equ.ipment (three co�Zete Elights}, or a cambination of �o H-727-200 and seven �-80 daily cycles (nine complete �lights) or some 24 daily cycles (flights) of B-757-200 pquiFment {see Appendix}. Guaranteed AI.I.ocat.ians af ?aDNE may not be t=ans�ened among air carriers (section 4.6) but will be withdrawn by the Cc�ni.ssion if not used for the pur- poses far which allacated {secti.on 5.1), or if the airline reduces service ta or ends all air service at �he Airport. 2. Allocations eased on Historical Service Larger inc,'umbp..nt air carriers tor 3i.r carrier conwanies> that se.rved the Airpo.rt in August 1986 would be eligible under the draft Ordinance no� only for a Guarant��d All.ocation as outlined �bave but 3l.so for an additianal a�.location of ADNE i.n direct proportion to each's historical share of air service to the A7.rpc�rt m�asurAd in to�al seats for scheduZed tak�o�f/Ianding cycles during August 1986 (�ection 3.3). 3. Allc�cations Transferred �rom c�ther Air Carriers The totai amount of ACaNE available to an air carrier may 3.Iso incl.ude any noise �ergy transferred to it from another air carrier in accordance with guidelines established by the Cqmmission. Noise ailocatzons ather than Guaranteed Alloca�.ions may be leased, assigned or otherwi�e t�rans�erred atmng air carriers �or mr�ney or any other consz.deration so that carriers can %ncrease or decrea�e the level of their ADI� and c.�erations at the Aimort over tur� { secti.on 4. 6 } . SII. INITIAL ALT�(�CATI�NS �' ADDiE AT DATE �' IMFL�N''rATION Allocations �.o ai.r carriers that wiii serve the Airport on the da� a:E .i.mplementation of the draft Ordinance w�.11 be made by the Commission Csection 3) zn response to air carrier Requc?sts for Allocations o.E Noise Energy, as follows: A, Guarante�d Alloca�.ion� Eirst, a share of the 124.46 EPNdB ceiling of ADNE will be ma.de �vailable 3s of that date for the estim�ted requir�nents a� air carriers For Guaranteed Allocations, as follaws: - l. I1� or 11�.87 EPNdB for Guaranteed A1.1.oca�ions to incumbent air carriers, comQu�.ed as follows: 8.1$ or 113.56 EPNdB for �� Guaranteed Allocations of ADNE used by air carriers sezving the Airport in August 1986 and producing Iess than 106.56 EPNdB in noise energy► plus an additional 2.9� or 109.OI EPNdB, to aiiaw incumbe.nt air carriers to .increase thei= numbers of tak�ff Jlanding cycles but not so as to individually �ceed 106.56 EFNdB. Thzs allcrwanccs is adequate to guarant�e the August 1986 levels af c�perations of all regional {ccxzmuter), a31-cargo, and schedi3l.ed and non-scheduled operations o.f charter ai.r carriers. Further, only six air carriers or ccxnbina�.ions of air carriers �ceed�d that Guaranteed ALlacation level a� that time {Northwest/Republic; Texas Air Corporation air carriers (Continental � F''.+3St2.L�1 � Peopl.e E�ress ), American; Delt�a/Western; Qnited; and '1WA,jOzarls ); 5$ or lI1.44 FPNdB �or Guarantc.�d Allocats�ns for not Iess than three new entrant ai.r carriers, each re�uesting up to I06.56 EPNdB in ADN� so that they could co�mence air service at the Airport on the c'fate af' impleme.ntation ar wi�hin _ the succeeding 180 day period tsectian 3.ltb}. � . B. IA1locations for Historical Service ext, the estima�d 123.71 F�PNdB in ADNE tha� r�n�i.ns after the above red tions for G�rant�ed A11.ocations will be made availai�le by the Ccmni.ssion to e remaining �i.�c air carriers tai.r carrier ccxnpanies) in proport%on to their A t I986 market shares at the Airport. The £inal, ailacation to any air carr'er w�uid not be less than its G�aranteed Atiocation o� 106,56 EgNdB. The attached Table, Estimated ZmQact of Draft Noise Budget flrdinance an S� ncum%nt Air Carriers Serving �iSP Airport, indicates estimated ADNE lev�ls and �enti.al numhers a� t�-�,.�off and landing cycles at dat� of imgle�nenta�ion as well a� est.i.matec3 reductions in cperations �roia August 1986 levels. These com- puta 'ons are presented in cycles of "Equivalent Aircraft" (with the 8-727- 200 as e baseline aircraft type) so �hat the reader can measure im�acts and tra- deof s arit:hmetically. Depending: upon tiie relative noisiness of the aircraft actual.l.y used, the rs of operations that w�ould neec� fi.r� be e3.i.m%nated could be greater or less Table in the A�nd� to draft C3rdinancei. . C. ( Te�aorazy Use of Noise Energy Ta the e.s�t�nt �hat new er�trant air carriers and incum%ent ai.r carriers do not recxu�st the amoun�s � Guarant�..�ed All.ocations o� ADNE that had been �e rvc.�d for their operations {above), that e.�rcess allocation of ADNE will be ma avai.lable pro-rata to the six airlines from which that noise e.nergy had taken, for their use on a t�..mporary basis un�.i1, needer3 .�or additional. G an�d Allocations (section 3.4), � � r s • • • � t . s �s- = s a►r • f • • • • �� A. Withdrawals of ADNE A1locations The Catmission may withdraw �DNE from any air carrier that does not use its allocation at least 65$ of possible aircraft cycles, or uses it other than for the purpose for which it was allocated, or for producing without justification more ADNE than allowed during any one of seve� c�eriods during the yP3r ("compliance reporting periods") during which the Comnission cocnpares �lanned use of ADNE with actual operations (sections 5.1 and 5.2). The Carmission may also withdraw additional noise energy from ai.r catriers in proportion to their then-current allocations of AIR1E if additional allocations are needed for addi- tional new entrant air carriers tsection 5.2). B. E�iration of ?�DNE Allocations The Conmission will not impose any charges or fees on air carriers for the allocations of ADNE it awards under its �rdinance, at least until January 1989 when its long-term agre�,,.�rnnts with air carriers ("Use Fee Agre�nents") are scheduled to e�ire. After that time, the Commission may choose to extend its noise allocations, allow th�n to expire, merge them into new Use r^ee Agreements or allocate them through another Ordinance (sections 4.4 and 5.3). V.. COr+�LIANCE . Fl�'ORCIIKF�iT AND PENALTIES A. Compliance wi.th Ordinance The Carmission will require air carriers to submit reports i�nediately after each compliance reporting oeriod comparing planned use of ADNF� against actual aperations during that period and providing justiFication for any variances (section 6.I). The Coctanission will also monitor carrier compliancP during each reporting period to preclude carriers from excr�eeding their ADriE' al].ocations (section 6.2). B. Penalties and Sanctions for Violations Any person (including an airline corporation or company and its officials) that violates the Ordinance may be u�risoned for not more than ninety (90) days or fined not more than $700.00 for each violation (section 7). Violations include exceeding an ADNE allocation for a camQliance reporting period without adequate justification or failing to file required reports or using an ADNE "C�iaranteed Allocation" other than for the ourpose awarded ( i, e. , internatsional or EAS vqerations). In addition, the Conanission may withdraw all or part of a carrier's ADNE, after notice to the carrier and the opnortunity for a hearing, for violation of the Ordinanc� (section 7.2). C. "Hardship" Ex��tiOn ftom Com?liance with ADNE Allocation �ny ai.r carrier may petition the Cannission for uo to a one-year "hardship" exem?tion from ccxn�pliance with its ADNE allocation (section 8). The Catmission, 3fter providing the apportunity for the petitioning carrier and other parties to be heard, must prcx�tly grant or deny the petition and may only • -i_ grant e e�npkion for a limited periad o£ time tnot more than one year) in very row circumstances in which the carrier convincingly docuirn.nts that it is � unable to comply with t.he Ordinance throu�gh no fault of its own. � r` .t 1` � 1�! • • �l •' M N � date of ia�Iec�ntatian of the dra£t �rdinance w,auld be set natn sooner nty-five {75? days after its effe�tive date tsection IO). � x , 0 -8- TABLE ESTIlKATED Il�A�.T �' GRAFT NOISE BUDGET C)RDINANCE ON SZX LARGEST AIR CARRIE,RS SERVING MSP AIRPORT .. �UIVALII�Fr AIRCRAFT 1/ CYCLES PFR AVF�RAGE WEII�AY ADNE ALLCCATION POSSIBLE CYCLES 2/ RIDC]C�IONS IN AIR CARRIERS AS C�' AT CYCLES F'ROM (CQNlPAI�]IES ) SERVING IMPLIIr1�3NTATION DATE INSPLII�TrATION 8/86 MSP S/86 (in EPNdB) DATE LEV�L NORTfiWE'ST (REPUBLIC ) 122. 99 137 . 7 41. 5 TAC (CONTINENTAL, F�ASTERN, PFJOPLE F�XpRESS ) AMERICAN DELTA (WESZ'ERN) ZWA (OZARR) 110.48 107.81 107.70 108 . 70 107.26 7.7 4.1 4.1 5.1 3.7 4.6 2.1 2. 8 3.9 1.5 1/Cormutations are for average we�.kday takeoff and landing cycles for a B-727-200 aircraft, the most catmon aircraft in use at the .�i.rport and in the nation. 2/Depending w�on the relative noisiness of the aircraFt actually used, the numb�r of cycles that could be operated at implementation date and the reductions in cycles from August 1986 levels would be greater or less (see Table in Appendix to Draft Ordinance) . Calculations of cycles exclucie international operations. , '.4 REPORT AND RECO1�i.ENDAT20RS OF T8S METRdPt"�LITAN AIRPORTS CO�lISSIOIQ 1QOI5S BIIDGET WOR�IAG GRODP I. Introduction I April, 1986, the Metropol.itan Airports Commission adonted a 2-ooint program to address aircraft noise problems at � M'aneapolislSt. PauZ International Airport, A�entral element o� t is program was the establishment of a ten-member Warking Group "...evaluate the feasibility of imelementing by ordinance at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport a noise budqet for that £acility. The eval.uation shoul.d include an asse�sment of:, 1) alternative ways of deter- mining the environmental capacity"of the air?�ort based on acceptabLe noise Ievels , 2) t�rajectad changes in traf �'ic and number of ooerations at KSP, 3} methods of avoiding discrimination and undue restricti.on to new access at MSP, and 4) impacts on intezstate commerce, air service, and comQetition. The wo=king grot�p shall take into accvunt th� P3rt 1Sa Study as adopted by� the MetropoTitan Airports Commigsian. 2he working group shall proceed vn the fallowing schedule: November l, 1986 - completion of draft ordinance; April 1, 1987 - consideration by MAC of draft o=dinance; June 1S, 1987 - pilot implementation of ordi- nance, if adopted by MAC." he Working Group has�held 20 meetings beginning in June, 1986, o fu11.y consider all aspects of the naise oroblem at MSF and �o ev�lop recommendatians on the form of t,he noise reduction mecha- i�m tiiat would be most anp=op=iate for implementation at MSP. urther, the Working Group with the assi.stance of a technical onsuitaht z�rovided by the Commissi.cn examined data, (comoiled rior to the Northwest �.irlines acquisition of Republic Airlines'. uggesting that aircraf t noise levels 3t MSP would continue to i�e until apnroximately 1990 and stay above current levels h=ough 1996�, unless some aaise �eduction mecha.nism was adopteci�. inally, the Working Group analyZed fihe results of a public opi- ion survey of MSP area residPnts concerning their sensita.vit�r �r� arioas levels and tvpes of aircraft noise. he working Graup and its consultant conside=ed in detai3. some ixteen possibLe "noise budget" mechanisms for limiting aircra�t oi.se at MSP. The Group sent its reoresent3tives to study ircraft no.ise reducing mechanisms already in place a� r�ogan - 2 - International Airport (Boston, MA), MacArthur Airport (Islip, NY), and Santa Ana-orange County Airport and • Burbank-Pasadena-Glendale Air�ort (CA). The Working Group received reports on these site visits in Auaust, 198�. II. Objectives Bef ore selecting a noise budget alternative, the Workirrg GrouD adepted a statement of objectives to oe accomplished in a noise reduction orogram: A. Overall Noise Reducti�n. To reduce the total aggreqate noise energy produced by air carrier aircraf t at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport to levels beinc experienced in 1984. B. Distributional �Quitv. To increase the daytime (6 a.m, to 11 p.m.) usP of the Pref erential Runway Systeml to an annual averaqe of fi��e to six hoars a day. In adooting a noise budget which accomplishes Objectives 1 and 2� alternatines should be measured against the following con- siderations: - flexibility for airlines/users - efficiency of airline operations - economic impact TII. Recommend3tions A. � phased "noise bndget' caacept, setting a cap on total aireraft noise bT sehednled air carrfers initially at 124.3;! EPAdH and nitimately at 124.11 EPL�dB, is reeommended from some I6 alternative noise rednction mechanisms that �ere analyzed bY the Working Groap for possible implementation �tc MSP.. The initial rednction, which is based upon 1984 t�relve-month average aoise levels, wonld be implemeated on Jnne 15, 1987 aad represents an 183 reductioa in total noi�� from Augnst 1986 noise levels. The aecon step, �hich is base� aa �annary - Jnne 1984 aoi�e levels, aroald be imple- .meated on Jnne 15, 1990 and represents a 223 rednctioa in total noiae trom Augnst 2986 Ievels. MAC shonld eqnitably 1The Preferential Runway System (PRS) is defined as the followi�- t�ao operating cvnfigurations: (I) 3rrivals on Runw3ys 29T� and 29R, and deoartur�s on Runw3y 22; and (2) arrivals on Runway 4 � �a :. allocate shases o� total noi�e to iacnmbea� and ne� eat=ant airliaes. 2he iait3al eap on noise at MSP ia set lox enongh to otfer alI commnnitie� cnrreatly impacted by flQ�.9� a snbstantial redn�tion ia noi9e ea�osnre £rom, the Angnst, I986 baseiine Ievel. The aoise.bndget shonld be =eviewed and evalnated annnally, inclndinq an a3aessment of progresa towasd achieving Ob�e�tive 2 l"D3stribntional Eqnity'? throagh the 1987-1992 timeframe. If significant anaatal pragress toxard meeting Ob�eetive 2 is aot evident,� addi- tiona3. remedial measnre� shcnld be i�aplemeat�d a3 �ariy a9 Jnne, 1988, and aannally thereat'ter. The ananal r�vie�r an� evalnation shoceld take iata aceanat actnal eaperienca Nith any measnrea whicit wi3.l iaqsaet nae of the PRS, for ezampl�, csten�ioa of Aanxay 4,/22 or impoaitf on of dif f eresstial Iandiag feea. General A�proach The Working Group iaiti311.y identified a Iist of 16 possib3.e "variations" on a noise budge�: Alternative 1: �ltern�tive 2: Alternative 3: Establish annual goals for ma,ximum �er- centages of Stage II oper3tions by any air carrier. Fstab3.ish aa annual naise oe= seat index tNPSI) for all ai= car=iers. Establish an annual noise pe= fiight index (NP�'I) for all air ca.rriers. �lternative 4: Establish a total daily noise energy level for the Airvort; alloca�e energy among existing �nd fu�ure carriers. nd departures on Runways 11T and 11R. Although the Working roup accepted thzs definition for the purpo�e of analyzing lte�native�proposals and reachinq a recammenda,tion £or MAC con- ideration, the Group recognized that the PRS as defined edirects very Iitt3.e aircxaf t traffic to the northeast, where epartures and arrivals arp already minimal. The Workinq G�oup ecammends that the �etropalitan Aircr3ft Sound �ba�ement Counci;� MASAC) examine ways �o rectify this inequity thraugh modifica- ions ta the PRS. Soecific suggestions addr�ssing this issue honld be develcaed �or considera�ion by MAC and the Federal viation Administr3tion_{FAA). � - 4 - Alternative 5: Fstablish a limit on to'tal daily Stace II ocera�ions. �lternatine 1�: Fstablish annual goals for m�ximum ger- ' centages of Stage II o�erations and establish an hourly slot system to per- mit more balanced use of the parallel runways and the PreFerential Runway System. � Alternative IB: T�stablish annaal coals for maximum per- centages of Stage II operatiens 3nd establish a daily sl.ot system. �ilternative 1C: Fstablish annual goals for maximum per- centages of Stage II operations and improv? PRS caoacity through an exten- sion of Runway 4/22. Alternative 2A: �'st3blish an annual noise oer seat index (NPSI) and establish an hourly � slot system. Alternative 2B: Fstablish an annual noise oer seat index (NPSI) and limit total daily o�erations. Alternative 2C• Fstablish an annual noise per seat index tNPSI) and imnrove PRS capacity throuqh an extension of Runway 4/22. Alternative 3�: �stablish an annual noise per flight index (NPFI) and establish an hourly s1.ot system. Alternati��e 3B: Fstablish 3n annual noise per flight index (NPFI) and establish daily s1.ot system. Alternative 3C: Fstablish an annual noise per flight index (NPFI) and improve PRS caoacity '' through an extension of Runway 4/22. , Alternative 4C: Fstablish a total daily noise energy Ievel for the �,irport, 311ocate energy �.� amonq air carriers and improve PRS capacity through an extension of Runway 4/22. e AlternativP SC: Establish a limit on total daily Stage II operations 3nd improve PRS caoacity throuqh an extension of Runway 4/22. 0 9 Af ge to in al of � � a i' - 5 - er considerabie deb��e and analysi.s of these alternatives, a etal concensus formed that a noise budget se�tzng a ceiling on al nois� ene=gv and equitably allocating that total energy to umbent 3nd new entrant airZines servinq MSP was the p=efer=ed ernative for achieving the Grou�o's ebjectives. The �dvantages �he pu=e "nvi�e budget" approach were seen as: � - Direct requlation of total noise energy generated at the Airport, - Strong incentive for air carriers to utiliae quieter Stage III aircraft. - Less direct interferen�e with airline scheduling �,nd operations, there�y increasing airline flexibility and minirnizing impacts on ais commerce. �ir carri.ers would be free to "budget" their noise all4cations between more oQerations of qua.eter aircr3ft or f�wer operations of noisier aircraft. - Less adminzstra�tive burden to MAC. Level of Noise Reduction majo=ity of group membe=s recommends that MAC set an initial c�� M5P noise at an average daily noise�energy level of 124.30 �tdB effective June I5, 1987 and an u�.timate cap of I24.11 FPNdB of June 15 , 1490 . Z T is noise level is established based upon an assessment of nais� 1 vels in 1984� W�,'11C�'1 was identi£ied through the Group's pnblic o inion survey as a time period ciuring which a Iarge number of m tropolitan area residents e�erienced a substantial worseninq o conditians. In addition, the Go�ernor's Task Force on A'rcraft Noise recommendeci that MAC establish a noise budget b sed upon."aggrega�e noise levels in I.984." reduction in average dail.�' noise Ievels to 124.34 EPNdB is quivalent ta approximately an 18$ reduction in total noise nergy from levels experienced in August, 1986; a reduction to 24.,11 FPNdB is equivalent to approximately a 22$ reduction from ugust, 1986 noise Zevels. � he initial energy .reduction weuld requi=e nearly a 30� cut in 'i tage SI airc=aft operations f=om August, 1386 operating levels, " ssuming that all flights woald be switched to Stage SII FPNdB is "effectiae perceived noise level." The o�rceived noi.�e evel (PNL) is the actual noise Ieael adjustQd to accou.nt for the act that the hi.gher f requency part of �he noise spectrum is th� - 6 - aircraf t. In addition to the cuts in Stage II operations requirPd to redu�,� total noi�e energy, the rule would require additional cuts from • air carriers presently serving MSP ("incumbent carriers") in order to create a pool for new entrant carriers. Because no scheduled air carrier was willing to participate in the Working Grou�'s activities, it was difficult to ass�ss the precise im�act of the Groun's�proeosal on any narticular air carrier. Assessment of the impact upon Northwest �,irlines, the airport's largest user, was alse made mare difficult by Northwest's merger with Re�ublic Airiines. On October I., 1986, Northwest reduced its total aircraft operations at the Airport b� 18$, reflectinc Pfficiencies from its merger with Republic as � well as seasonal schedule adjustments. IInder the nro�osed ordi= nance • �n-r�hWPSt wou� d initiallY be requir� to cut as__manv as 42 tion, a other incu ent a''ir carriers would be required to cut approximat�l.y 48 daily ooerations. These estimates for required cuts ia operations described above assume no replacement of noisy aircraft with quieter aircraft. 3. Annual Review The Working Group recognizes the imcortance of the Pref erential Runway System (PRS)3 as a mechanism for distributing noise equitably throughout the area and urges FAA to util-ize t!�e PRS during any hours of the day when numbers of aircraft operations allow its use. While the "noise budqet" alternative selected does not guarantee or mandate use of the PRS during a certain number of hours per day, the Working Group concluded that the "noise budget" could oermit some increased use of PRS in the short and middle term in the event air carriers are unable iaune- diately to substitute a substantial number of quiet technology aircraf t. However, because achievement of Objective 2 cannot in any way be guaranteed, the Workinc Group recommends that the , primary contributor to an individual's perception of the noisi- ness of a sound. The effective perceined noise level is obtain�� , by integrating the tone-corrected PNL over the period of a singl.c� event, introducing considerations of frequency 3nd duration. FPNdB has been used for many years as a measure of aircraft noise. 3See footnote 1. . �" ! "' i � t no 3e budget be reviewed and eval.uated annually to �ssess �= gress towasd �achieving iacreased "di�tributional equi�y" th oug� use of the PR.5 and r�commends further that additional re dial action be taken by MAC i.� the objective of "D'stributional Fquit " is not'achieved. B. � G � MAC ahonld annonnce a schednle for =evie�ring the t4oise Bndget propor�al developed by the 1+1'oriciag� G=onp �o that the vieara of the aehednled airliaea, othes aviation n�e=s, snrrooading communitie� and the�II.S. Departm�cat of T=ansportation canr be obtain+�d. � prelfminasy pnblic hea=iaq stionld be held in Janita=y, 1987, on the '�orlcing Gsoa�'s re�flmme�cied approaci� and draft o=dinanca, in advan�� of adoptioa of a fina2 aoise badget ordinaace. noted, the Wor'�ing Grouv's efforts to denelop a noise budget dinance have been made more difficult by the unwillingness af e scheduled airlines tq participate in t�e 'r7orking Group's tivities. Zn additior�,' the EAA chose �o monitor "the Workinq. oup'� activities rather than to participate fully in the deve - pment of.the Group's recommendations.� Finally, the ni.ews of her ai=port u�ers and all surrownding �ommunities hane not yet en solicited on the Noise Budget concept under conside�ration. T e Wo=kinq Grouv thus recommends that MAC announce its schedule f r conside=ing the naise budget concept the Graup has daveloped a d that MAC conduct two Dubl..zc hearings between now and April l, 1 87: a fi=st puhlic hearing to receive community, aviation i dustry and, hopefully, U.S. Depaztment oP Trans�ortativn com- m nts on the noise•budget anproach of the Working Groun; and a� s cond oublic hearing on the overall Part 150 ?�ircra�t Noise C mQatibility Program, includinq the final �ersion of � noise b dget as part of �hat comorehensive Submission. e"�lorkinq Group is currently in the oroce�s of draftinQ 3 tailed outline and d=aft ordinance specifying the precise chanisms which shoul.d be utilized by MAC. 2t is exaected that e�draft ordinance, together with a compzehensive report settine� t all su�porting documentation, will be submitted to �iAC within e next three ta £our weeks. M�,G sho�tZd inei�dc �hc Aoiae Bndge� ordiaance ia its cnmpre- heasivc Fart 15Q Aircraft Roiae CostQatibility P=oq=am beinc� readied for sab�issioa to F1�l�i. A final pnblic heariag on the�comgrehen�ive Pa=t 15� program shonld be held not late� than April. 1987, e Working Grouo would not envision that MAC's decision to con- ct two �ublic hearings on the nozse budget aparoach aad then on e overall Part i50 program should delay ezther pracess, i7nder 0 the-recammended sc�nario, ylAC could bQth act on the noise budqet ordinance and submi� its comnrehensive P3rt I.50 Proqram to FAA Y� �.pril, 1987. November 7, 1986 '.M . , ,� Joceiyn Speci a1 yinnesa 520 Laf St. Pau (6�.2) 2 NQISE BUOGET WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Qlson Assistant Attorttey General a Pallution Control Agency yette Raad , MN 55IS5 6-7343 Oave Ke so ' Minnesa a Poliution Control Agertcy 520 Laf yette Road St. Pau , MN 55155 t�I�� z s-��2 Qavid Direc 3M - 690 8 St. P {612} M. Woadrow t r of Aviation A iation Dept. a ield Stre�t a 1, MN 55I07 78-5840 Bldg. 670-01 Bi11 �ester Metropalitan CounciT 300 Metro Square Bldg. 7th & Robert Street St. Pau1, MN 5�101 � 612 � Z91-6630 Jai�n Harri ngtan Metropolitan Council 30p Metro Square 81dg. 7th & Robert Stre�t St. Paui, MN 551�1 . Thomas Anderson General Cauns�l Metropoiitan Airports Commission 6Q40 28th Avenue South Minneapoiis, MN 55450 (61.2? 726-8I3$ Counci man 5teve .Cramer Nige1 Finney 307 Ci y Hai1 Oirector of Airport Development Minnea oTis, MN 5�4I7 Metropoiitan Airparts Commissian {612) 48-2211 6040 28th Avenue Saut� Minneapolis, MN 55450 B i 1 l N'�ano Dayton Nudson Corpqration 777 Ni oliet Mai1, 14th Floor Minnea olis, MN 55402 t612} 70-6477 Dav�d Koehs�r � 5740 IOth Avenue South Minne polis, MN 5�417 {612) 823-1242 {6IZ) 726-8I28 Dan Priebe 7225 Bloomington Richfield, MN 5�423 t6I2) 869-8I86 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------____________�_ Ray M dgwick ' Evan Futterman Hawar , Needles, Tammen, Bergendoff Howard, NeedIes, Tammen, Bergendoff 1500 . Beauregard Street 1500 N. 8eauregard Siree� Alexa dria, V�rginia 22133 , Alexandria, Vlrginia 22233 (703) 998-3200 (743) 998-324Q Frani Fede� Ai rp� 630I Mi nn� t61Z Benson 1 Aviation Admirtistration ts Oistrict 4ffice 4th Avenue South polis, MN 5�450 725-3346 . Jac4c Corbeti Spiegel & Mcfliarmid I350 New Yorfic Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-4798 (202) 879-4023 Z STATEMENT BY STEVE CRAMER AND DAVE KOEHSER N}in�eapolis �Council Member Steve Cramer was one of the two representatives from MASAC s�taring a vote thai represented the citizen side �f i�4ASAC Dave Koehser was the SMAAC respresentative on the Noise Budget Woricing Group, . � , an a This statement is not a dissent from the final report, but rather rmatfon of Sectian III (3). Tt is the view of the Warking Group meanbers living fn Minneapolis� tfia� Obj�ctives One and Two - an overal7 cap an na�se energy and eguitable dis de� bution of that noise - are of equai imp�rtance. Whi1e t�is document primarily with Objective One, we want�to emphasize our support�for th� r��or_t hinges on the annuai evaluation pracess in Section III (3): Thi recommended pro,cess re�_ uires further action if the effe�t of the noi e budget fa11s short of ac�ieving Objective Two.� ��e�ded adjustments can take many forms; �.g., removaI of general aviation from the t�inneapolis- St. Paul International Airport, enhancement of the preferential runway mi to , or ot�er te�hniques. To prompt a thoraugh review of what avenues be emp�1 oyed to achi eve Qbject� ve Twa, ti�e Worici ng Group i s farwar�i ng a request to expiare options far better a�r traffic disbursement. must be pre�ared to take further action at the time of tt�e first noise bu�get evait�ation�and every year thereafter io insure that Objective Two isl met. .Duri ng ttte Warki ng Group dei i berati ans , tfie representati ves from Mi�nneapolis argued that fmplementatiort af a"slot" system, caupled with a t mix ruie (exemplifzed in Optzons 1A or 1Bj would more ciosely achieve ecti�e Twa thart the recor�nended alternative. We wouid iike to urge t rf -- dur.inq the course af public hearin�s - data is nrovided that s�s�ests .a d be superiar., that the subject of slats eombined �= wji tit a fi eet mi x ru 1 e be re-exanai ned by the MAC. � Fi nal�ly, we agre�� tf�at the FAA sheul d be consui ted about the noi se �ei. However, tf�e decision to��mpiement tt�e nolse budget should be . e i rtdependent from .and pri or to arty formal FAA revi ew and cor�ment on e MAC Part 150 Pian. _ MAC Staff Re�ort - Noise 8udget Ordinanc� MinaeapoTis-St. Paul International Airport The Noise Budget Working Group, has recommended the adoQtion of an Qrdinance which would establish a naise energy limit for Minneapolis-St. Paui International Airp4rt. The propased noise budget was adapted by a 6-4 vate with MAC staff, the Minnesota Business Aircraft Association and ti�e Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Councii user representative voting against its adoption. . There are thre� cancerns with the prapasai ad�pted by t�e Noise Sudget Wor�ing Graup: 1} the method. by whicfi noise wiil be cantralled, 2) the extent af the reduction in �oise belaw tne August, i986 base period, and 3? the inability af t.�e proposed rule t� act�ieve "dfstributional equity". 1. METHQQ OF NQISE CQNTRQ� A major focus of the N�ise 6udget Woricing Group was the evaluation of aTter- native methods of controlling noise at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The Working Graup deveToped an initial Tist of I6 alternat�ve appraaches, however based an extensive analysis compieted over a series of approximateiy 20 meetings, these aiternatives were reduced to a cfioice betwe�n ti�e adaption of a mecfianism that would limit the amount of aircraft noise (naise er►ergy 1 im1 t} ar a mecttani sm tt�at wou 1� 1 imi t ttte number af ai rcraft operati ons {aircraft slats). Eaci� op�ion has differing adm�inistrative, 1ega3, and opera- tzonai implications. 7he cans�nsus af. the G�oup was that a lim�t on tota3 ttoise ener9Y, and the allocati�n of that e�ergy io incum�ent artd new entrant airlines serving M5P, would be preferable to the "aircraft slot" approacn that would have tne MAC control and limit a]1 aircraft ap�ratians on either an hourly or daily basis as an indirect means of controlling aircraft noise, In part, the nQise energy conc�pt was preferred over the slot approacf� because the imposiiion by MAC of noise energy limits may be less susceptabTe to a 1egaT cfi allenge than would MAC efforts to contral aircraft operations. Whi1e the Tegai risk was only one factor considered, the impartance of avoiding urtnecessary delays in imple- menting a rtolse reduction mect�anism was gTven cansiderable welgttt, Furttter, consistent with tt�e Airiine Oeregulatian Act, tfte carriers woutd be free under tt�is appraacft to allocate their noise energy between more operations of quieter aircraft ar fewer aperations of noisier aircraft. There wouid, in fact, be considerable incentives far ttre airIines to operate quieter aircraft. Z. LEYEL 4F NQISE� CONTROI. The second companent of the action taken by the Worlcing Graup involves the leveIs of noise energy reduc�ion. The recomnendaton for the initial cutbacic on June 15, I987, is a noise energy ievel IS'X below that of August I986, In order to achiev� a reductiqn in airport noise energy of this magnitude, a cutback from August, 2986 ac�ivi�y leveis of I30 aperations (or 6a fiights} by a�rcraft of average noise levels would be required. In addition, it is necessary to set aside a pool af noise energy ta a]iaw new entrant airiines ta inztiate 5erviCe to tf�e Twirt Citzes; to incorporate tttis poa1, a total of I6� aperations {80 flfg�its} by aircraft of average nois� levels would have � T ' �o be cu from if�e incumbent air carriers August 1986 schedule. The Narthwes /Repuhlic merger, effective on October i, 1986, has maved toward these cuts. e proposed noise energy limit would require a further cut of 42 daily Northwest operations and a reductian of 48 daily opera�iorts by a�her airlines. The num ers provided above are for aircraft of average noise leveis, and assume no repl cement af the noisier aircraft•with quiet aircraft. The prapose� reduc- tion of 160 operations is significant based upon data pravided to the Warlcing Group w th reqard to the abiIity of airlines-to re�iac� naisier aircraft with quiet a rcraft. For exampie, Nortttwest Airlines does not have a suf�icient - number f quieter Stage III aircraft af an appropriate size to repiace noisier OC-9 op ratians, nar daes ttre airline have enough M08Q air.craft to effe�tively re�lac� 8-727 operations. tlnited Airlines is.presently in a similar posftian wi ttr n+a Stage I I I ai rcraft smal l er than a 8�-767 to rep 1 ace 8-727 and 8-737-20t� aperati ns. Given tttis inabiiity to replace Stage Ii operations wittr e�uivalent Siage I I oper�ations, an in�nediate substantial loss in air service t� MSP could be anti ipate�, with a resuttani negative effect en e�onomic development for the entire tate. In addition to tfre imrtediate impacts, ttte extent ofi the cut and the lac of al�ernative aircraft wouId alsa pre�lude ti�e airlines' abiiity ta develop additianal service in future years. Suct� actfans seem incansistent with Siate�vi e efforts to attract job.p.roducing business, both national and inter- nation 1, to Minnesota. The majority proposal also presents a greater patentlai for 1i igation c�allenging the Ordinance as an unconstitutio�aI burden on #nters ate commerce. The Go 1985, Intern As an MAC th simila prapos to thi in Apr' was ba Govern would have p j?8T"10t�. 3. D In ad� ma,7ar ruTe Group In fa �' decre aircr the c Runwa the c towar the N faile' ernor's Task �orce on Aircraft Noise, in its re�ort published in ndarsed the adoption of a naise budget for Minneapolis-St. Paui tionai Airport based upan "....aggregate noise levels in 1984....". c�.ive participant in the Governor's Task Force, 1t is tf�e impression of t ttre i nte�t of th i s s�cti or� af the re�ort was to estab i i sh no i se 1 evel s to tt�ose experienced during the open window seas�n in 1984. The 1 adopted by the majority of the Working Group is in direct cantrast approactt. The action taken by the Metr�politan Airports Commission 1, I986, ta recommend an. evaluation of tf�e feasibiity of a naise budg�t, �d upan tfte assumptions inherent in the reco�nendation from the r's Task Force. Nad tf��s.approacft be�n follawed, the recnmmendation ave be�� for a rollback ta the noise 1evels of August, 2984, which wauld oduced an il� reduction in noise energy from the August, 1986, base IBUTIONAL EQUITY itiort to tt�e above conc�rns re2ating to ttre ruie as adopte� by the ty af the Wor4cing Graup, it is impartartt ta recognize that the proposed . oes nat move taward accamplishing the se�ortd objective adopted by tf�e that of inereasing daytime use af the preferential runway system (PRS�. t, the Noise Budget approact� as adopted by tfte Working Group may serve ta ,se PRS use over time as more quiet aircraft are subsiituted for noisier ,ft.. Under t3�is situation, it is necessary tq focus fln ways of increasing pability of tt�e preferential runway system. The prapased extension ta ' 4122 wouid provide an increas� of betwe�n 20 and 30 operations an hour to .pacity of the preferential runway system, and couid move substantially acttievement the distributional equity. 7he Woricing Group recognized tf�at �ise Budget wauid not provid� the desired increase in PRS use, however it to spe�ifically endorse any proQosal to meet t#te objective. SUMMARY Based on the a�ove fiaciors, MAC staff endarses tf�e conce�t of a nofse energy limit as the appropriate noise budget mechanism, and suggests that an 11� reduciion in tatal noise energy from August, I986 Tevels be eva- luated by the Corr�mission as an alternative ta t�e praposal of the Working Group. This initial rallbacic wouId be consiste�t w#th the intent of the Governor's Task Force on aircraft noise, would provide a meaningful reduction in n4ise exposure to the community, and would.stand a higher probablity of suc- cessfuTly withstanding tegaT challenges. MAC staff aisa recommends a second ste� cutbacic to average annual noise levels of 1984 �e accamplished in�'June-, 1990. This actian wouid provide an additionai ievel of noise reduction for the comnunity over the ensuing three-year time period. Finally, MAC staff recom- mends t3�at� tf�e Runway �I22 exte�asi ar� be i ntegrated i nto tfre Nai s� Budget process to a11ow the acf�ievement of the secand objeciive, increased day-time use of af the preferentz a1 runway systes�. I117186 . , ".4 � JP. ; � :4! CITY OF MENDOTA IiEIGHTS MEMC? I5, 298? TO Mayar and City Council � -, FR M: Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator SU ECT: Presentation Regarding Development af Langer 5ite Attached please find a self-e�lanatory letter of request n Mr. Gharl.es Nolan, wha will be present at Tuesday'� Council ting. I:madlr atthchment , City Council City o� Mendota 75q South Plaza Mendota Heights, NOLAN BROS., INCORPORATED Contractars � P.O. BOX 26599 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINWESOTA 55426 Heights Drive Mn. 55120 Dear Cauncil Membexs: � January 7th, 1987 This letter is written with ref�rence to the (1?) acre industrial zoned parcel of iand located in the Northwest quadrant of Snterstate highways #494 and #35E. We have reached an agreement to purchase this property �rom Langer Construction Co. and are prepared to move ahead with development plans. However, prior �to doing this we would like to discuss our ideas for the property with the Council members in order to gain the benefit a� any thaughts ar coancerns you might have. With this in mind, we reguest to be included on the Council meeting agenda for the evening of January 20th. , .� Very truly yours, ; _� ��Z�.�.�''�....' Charles D. Nala 4 To ; Re MEMO CITY OF MENDQTA F�IEIGI3TS January 15, 198? � Mayar and City Council Kevin Fraz ,�`ity Administrator Architects Cantract and Praject Budget for City Ha1.l DUCTION At the last meeting, Council directed staff ta make certain ch nges in the architect's contract for City Hall, sp cifically to incorporate praject cost with a percentage fe . Council also directed preparation of a project budget. Th se dacuments are attached �or your review and approval. r� CT'S CONTRACT ched is a revised and proposed contract between the City Lindberg Pierce, Inc. The foll.owing changes are made the contract previously reviewed by Council: 1. The first page dacuments the program as outlined in the City Hall Committee report. In some places the Committee report actually refers to 28,440 �q. ft. Hawever, the finally adopted program for cost estimating purposes was the 18j874. 2e Pg. 9 set� the architects compensation at 80 of canstructian cost, which is $22I,480, $89,184 for Phase I and $22,296 ior Phase II. However, under our previous cantract with L/P, we receive a$4,750 credit toward Phase I, reducing it to $84,434. 3. Please see Articl.e 25 on Page 11 for other Special sta.pulations. . Pierce will be pre�ent to answer any Cauncil questions. BUDGET As equested, Lindberg-Pierce has also provided us wa.th the att ched letter suggesting additianal costs that will be out ide the construction contract. With exception o�' the $87,500 far interior furni�hings and �urnishings con�ultant, sta f has included all of �hese in the attached project bud et. We feel that it i� toa premature to knaw our furnishings needs. Rather, staff proposes that we postpone adopting a furnishings budget, and plan to pay for any such expenses out of cash reserves at the time. Attached is a proposed project budget. The budget is divided into two parts, those items that will be �aid from cash in � the 1987 adopted budget, and those that will be a part of the permanent bond/lease financing. The permanent financing will not be needed until we begin construction, and then, only in stages as construction proceeds. Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy indicates that, depending upon financial conditions at the time, we may wish to put more equity into the project up front, not financing the whole amount. There are several possible sources of such funds, including General Fund balance, Industrial Development Fund balance, and having the Tax Increment.District purchase the old Fire Hall site and dedicating'the proceeds toward City Hall. However, Larry suggests that we reserve those decisions until closer to the time of putting the financing package together. The City Hall Fund adopted as part of the 1987 budget has revenues of $75,000, and appropriated $70,000 for preparation of the plans and specifications. Since the attached project budget anticipates the need for up to $95,000 cash in 1987, it will be necessary for Council to appropriate an additional $25,000, and we recommend that the resultant deficiency be covered by a$20,000 transfer from the Industrial Development Fund. Even after 1987 expenditures, that fund will have a balance of $160,500. ACTION REQUIRED After discussion and any desired amendments, Council should: 1. Pass a motion approving the contract with Lindberg- Pierce for architectural services. 2. Approve a project budget. 3. Appropriate necessary funds to the City Hall Sinking Fund budget to cover 1987 cash expenditures. B � THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AfA Document B141 >tandard Form of Agreement Betvveen Owner and Architect 1977 EDITION THIS DOCUMEN7 HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION W►TH AN A7TORNEY IS ENCOURAGEU WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFlCATfON � AGREEM NT . . � made as f the t Hundred and � BETWEE � i� t ! 'and the Twentieth . day of January Eighty-Seven. the Owner: City of Mendota Heights 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 rchitect: Lindberg Pierce, Inc. 600 First Avenue North, Suite 710 Minneapolis, MN 55403 in the year of Nineteen � � For the f Ilowing Project: ;(Indude deta led description of Project location and scope.) �New Cit Hall and Police Headquarters to be located on property presently owned by the City at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and State Highway 110. The building shall ;be appr ximately 18,874 s.f. comprised of the following major areas: 1 , � Ad inistration 3310 s.f. En ineering/Code Enforcement 1835 s.f. �' Po ice/Emergency Preparedness 3185 s.f. ' Pr bable Construction Cost is $1,393,500 � �The Ow er and the Architect agree as set forth below. Common Areas 4930 s.f. Vehicle Storage 1200 s.f. Unprogrammed 4414 s.f. Copyright 1917, �926, 1948, �957, '1953, '1958, 't961, '1963, 1966, �967, '1970, 7974, p 1977 by The American Institute of Archilects, 1735 New Ynrk Avenue, N.�N., Washington, D.C. Z0006. Reproduction of Ihe material herein or substantial quotation of its provisions without permission of the AIA violates the copyright laws of the United States and will be subject to legal prosecution. AIA DOCUME T 6141 • 01YNER-ARCHI7ECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH ED�TION • JULY'1977 • AIA� • OO '1977 THE AMERIC N INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 7735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 0 6141-1977 7 t TE � ARCHIT 4 BASIC SER AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 1 SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES �7he Ar hitecYs Basic Services consist of the five � phases escribed in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5 and include normal structural, mechanical and electrical � engine ring services and any other services included in Artic e 15 as part of Basic Services. i �,� SCHEM 1.1.� The kiy the Own and shall re with the O r 7.1.2 The tion of the each in ter forth in Sub � 7.1.3 The tive approac 1.1.4 Base Project bud for approval consisting o+ the scale anc '1.1.5 ihe f ment of Prc area, volume 1 �,2 DESIGN 1.2.7 Eiased ments and a the program pare, for ap Documents to fix and d Project as to trical system be appropri� , 1.2.2 The f Statement o ! �,3 CONS7{ 1�.3.'1 Basec uments and i`ry of the Pr the Owner, the Owner, ings and Sp� ,ments for th �'.3.2 The f tion of the r the Conditi� ment betwe 1}'.3.3 The t i1C DESIGN PHASE rchitect shall review the program furnished r to ascertain the requirements of the Project iew the understanding of such requirements ,rchitect shall provide a preliminary evalua- ro�ram and the Project budget requirements, s of the other, subject to the limitations set �aragraph 3.2.1. rchitect shall review with the Owner alterna- ies to design and construction of the Project. on the mutually agreed upon program and et requirements, the Architect shall prepare, by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents ' drawings and other documents illustrating I relationship of Project components. �rchitect sha11 submit to the Owner a State- �bable Construction Cost based on current � or other unit costs. IEVELOPMENT PHASE on the approved Schematit Design Docu- y adjustments authorized by the Owner in or Project budget, the Architect shall pre- roval by the Owner, Design Development �nsisting of drawings and other documents scribe the size and character of the entire irchitectural, structural, mechanical and elec- , materials and such other elements as may �chitect shall submit to the Owner a further Probable Construction Cost. CTION DOCUMENTS PHASE on the approved Design Developme,pt Doc- ny further adjustments in the scope or qual- ject or in the Project budget authorized by he Architect shall prepare, for approval by :onstruction Documents consisting of Draw- :ifitations settin� forth in detail the require- � construction of the Project. •chitect shall assist the Owner in the prepara- �cessary bidding information, bidding forms, is of the Contract, and the form of Agree- n the Owner and the Contractor. �chitect shall advise the O�vner of any adjust- ments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost indicated by chan�es in requirements or general market conditions. 1.3.4 The Architect shall assist the Owner in co,�nection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents re- quired for the approval of governmental authorities hav- i�g ju�isdiction over the Project. �,4 BtDDlNG OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.4.1 The Architect, followin� the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest Statement of �Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals, and assist in awarding and preparing contracts for const�uction. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE—ADMINISTRATION � OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.5.1 The Construction Phase will commence with the award of the Contract for Construction and, together with the ArchitecYs obligation to provide Basic Services under this Agreement, will termi�ate when final payment to the Contractor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, �vhichever occurs first. �.5.2 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement and incorporated in the Contract Documents, the Architect shall provide administration of the Contract for Construc- tion as set forth below and in the edition of AIA Docu- ment A20�, General Conditions of the Contract for Con- struction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 1.5.3 The Architect shall be a representative of the Owner during the Construction Phase, and shall advise and consult with the Owner. Instructions to the Contrac- tor shall be forwarded through the Architect. The Archi- tect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Contract Documents unless other�vise modified by written instrument in ac- cordance with Subparagraph 1.5.16. 1.5.4 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals ap- propriate to the stage of construction or as otherwise agreed by the Architect i� �vriting to become generally familiar �vith the progress and quality of the Work and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accord- ance with the Contract Documents. However, the Archi- tect shall not be required to make exhaustive or con- tinuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quan- tity of the Work. On the basis of such on-site observa- tions as an architect, the Architect shal4 keep the Owner informed of the progress and quality of the Work, and shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. 1.5.5 The Architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety pr�cautions and probrams in connection witli the Work, for the acts or omissions of the Contractor, Sub- AIA DOCUMEN B141 • O\VVER•ARCHITECT AG�.EE�fEVT • THIRT[ENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIA� • OO 7977 THE A�tERlG1N {NSTITUTE OF ARCFiITECTS, 1;3i �lE\V 1'ORK AVENUE, N.�V., WASIif\GTON, D.C. 20006 B�I�LI-�I9%% 3 } ! • contractors ar any ather persans performing any of the Work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, 2.5.6 The Architect shall at aII times have access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. 1,5.7 The Architect sha21 determine the amounts awing to the Contractor based on observatio�s at the site and on evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, and sha31 issue Certificates far Payment in such amounts, as provided in the Contract Documents. 1.5.8 The issuance of a Certi(icate for Payment shall constitute a representation by the Architect to the O�vner, based on the Architect's observations at the site as pro- vided in Subparagraph 1.5.4 and on the data camprisin� the Contractor's Appiication for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that, to the best of the Architect's knowled�e, infarmation and belief, the qual- ity af thc� Work is in accardance with the Contract Docu- ments {�ubject ta an evaluation of the Work for con- formance with the Contract Documents cspon Su6stantiai Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests re- quired by or perfarcned under the Contrack Documents, ta minor cleviations from the Contract Documents car- rectable prior to completion, and to any specific qualifica- tions stated in tt�e Ceriifi�ate for Payment}; and that the Contractor is entitled ta payment in the amount certified. However, the issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall nat be a representation that the Architect has made any examinatian to ascertain how and for what purpose the Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Cantract Sum. 1.5.9 The Architect shall be the interpreter of khe re- quirements of the Cantract Documents and the judge of the performance thereunder by bath the Owner and Contractor. The Architect shall render interpretations nec- essary for the proper execution or progress of the Work with reasanable promptness an written request of eiti�er the Owner or the Contractor, and shall render written de- cisions, within a reasonable time, on alC claims, disputes and other matters in question between the C7wne�r and the Coniractor relating ta the execution or progress of the Work or the interpretat'san of the Contract Dacuments. 1.5.10 Interpretations and decisions af the Architect shall be consistent with the inient of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in written or graphic form. !n the capaciky of interpreker and judge, the Architett shail endeavar ta secure faithfu( perform- ance by both the Owner and the Contractor, shall nat show partiality to� either, and shall not be liable far the resuit of any interpretation or decision rendered in gorrd faith in such capacity. 1.5.11 The Architeci's decisions in matters relating to artistic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent af the Contratt Dacuments. The Architect's decisians on any ather c(aims, disputes or ather matters, inciuding those in question between the Owner and the Contractar, shai! be subject to arbitratian as provided in this Agree- ment and in the Contract Documents. 1.5.'12 The Architect shaU have authority to reject Work which d�Qs not canform t� the �ontract Documents. Whenever, in the Architect's reasonable opinion, it is necessary or advisable for the implementatian of the intent af the Contract Documents, the Architect wi11 have author- ity to rcquire special inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Docu- ments, whether or not such Work be then fabricated, in- stalled or completed. 1.5.13 The ArcFritect shali review and approve or take ather appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop prawings, Praduct Qata and Samples, but oniy far canformance evith the design cac�c'�pt of the Work and with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such actian shall be taken tivith reasonable prompiness so as to cause no delay. The Architect`s ap- proval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of �vhich the item Es a companent. 1.5.14 Tfie Architeck shall prepare Change Orders for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and shall have authority to arder minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum ar an extension of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with the intent ot the Cantract ` Documents. i.5.15 The Architect sha11 canduct inspectians to deker- mine the Dates of 5ubstantial Completion and final com- pletion, shaU receive and � forward to the Owner for the Qwner's review written warranties and reEated documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor, and shall issue a final Certificate for Pay- ment. 1.5.�6 The extent af the duties, responsibilities and lim- itations of authority of the Architect as the �wner's rep- resentative during construction shall not be modified or extended without written consent of the Uwner, the Con- tractor and the Architect. 1.6 PROIECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVlCES 1.6.1 If tlie C3wner and Architect agree that more ex- .tensive representation at the site than is described in �Paragraph �,5 shall be provicfed, the ArchiEect shail pra- vide ane or more Project Representatives to assist the Architect in carrying out such responsibilities at the sike. 1.6.2 Such Project Representatives shal( be seiected, em- ployed and directed by the Architect, and the Architect shall be campensated there€or as mutually agreed be- tween the Owner and the Architect as set forth in an ex- hibit appended ro this Agreement, which shall describe the duties, responsibiiities and limitations af autharity of such Project Representatives. 1.6.3 Thrau�h the observations by sueh Praject Repre- sentatives, the Atchitect shail endeavor to provide further protection for the Owner againsk defecks and deficiencies in the Wor3c, but the furnishing af such project representa- tion shalf not modify the rights, responsibilities or obliga- tions of the Architect as described in Paragraph �.5. '(,7 ADD1TtONAt SERVtCES The following Services are not included in Basic Services unEess so identified in Article l5. They shall be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner, artd they sha!! be paid for by the Q�vner as pr�vided in this A�reement, in additia» to the compensation for Qasic Services. AIA pOtUMENT 8741 • O\VNER•ARCHITEC7 AGREEMENT • 7HIFTEENTH EOtTION • JULY '1977 • AIAm • Q 1977 4 8141-�I�%% THE AMERICAN IN5TITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., \VASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 � . t 4 } � � � 1J.1 Prov � gramming t 1.7.2 Prov � + studies. I1.7.3 Prov + �ronmentai `sites, and p `sian5 requi 'or others h � �7,7.4 Prav 'tems and e 'structed du '1J.5 Provi ;or faci(ities verify the a �nished by t 1.7.5 Prep< 'sequential � with biddin 'completion requested b 1.7.7 Provi �separate cor t '1.7.8 Provi ''a constructi by the {�wr � 1.7.9 Pravi analyses of tiry surveys (abor. < '1.7.'10 Pro� vices requii procuremer relaked equi � 1J.11 Pro� ing analyses of the Owner's needs, and pro- � requirements of the Project. ing financia( feasibiliry or ather special iing pEanning surveys, site evaluations, envi- udies or comparaiive siudies of prospective eparing special survcys, studies and submis- �d for apprava(s of gavernmen#ai authorities ri�g jurisdiction aver the Fraject. jing services relative ta future facilities, sys- uipment which are not iniended to be con- 'n� the Construction Phase. jing services to investigate existing conditions �r to make measured dra�vings thereof, or to curacy of drawings or other infarmation fur- e 4wner. rin� documents of alternaie, separate or ids or providing extra services in connection g, negotiatiqn ar construction prior to the of the Construction Documents Phase, when r the C?wner. ding coordination oF Wark performed by �tractars or by the Owner's own forces. ding services in connectian with the work of �n manager or separa#e consultants retained spaces. '1.7.i2 Ma other dacur with writter are required or regulatiar uments or a control of tt # 1.7.13 Pre� data and p Change Orc Basic Com� struction Cc quired of th required by Architecf. 1.7.14 Ma� tories or del ices require� by the t�wn i.7.15 Pra� any Wark c r ing Detailed Estimates af Canstruction Cost, wning and operating costs, or detailed quan- or inventories of material, equipment and ding inkeriar design and other sim�lar ser- d for or in connection with the seiection, or installation of furniture, furnishings and ment. ding services for planning tenant or rental ng revisions in Drawings, Specifications or �ents when such revisions are inconsisient approvals or instruttions previously given, by the enactment or revision af codes, laws s subsequent to the preparation af such doc- •e due to other causes not solely within the e Architect. aring Drawings, Specifications and supporting oviding other services in connection with ers ta the extent that the adjuskment in the er�sation resuiting fram 'the adjusted Con- st is not commensurate with the services re- � Architect, provided such Change Orders are causes not so(ely within the controi of the ng investigations, surveys, valuations, inven- iled appraisals of existing facilities, and serv- in connection with construction perfarmed ding consultation concemin� repiacement of tmagec! by fire or other cause during con- struction, and furnishing services as may be required in connection with tfie replacement of such Work. 1,7.16 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, ar by major defects or deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction. �.7.27 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings shawing significant changes in the Work mada, during construction based on marked-up prints, dra'wings and other data fumished by the Contractor to the Architeck. �.7.�8 Praviding exkensive assistance in the utiiization of any equipmenk ar system such as initiai start-up or Eesting, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consuitation during operation. 1,7.19 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the final Certificaie far Fayment, ar in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. 1.7.20 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert wikness in connectian with any pubiic hearing, arbitration pro- ceedin� ar legal proceeding. 1.7.27 Providing services o£ consultants for other than the normal architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical engineering services for the Project. 1.7.22 Praviding any other services not otherwise in- cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accardance with generally accepted architectural practice. 1,g TIME 1.8.7 The Architect shall perform Basic and Additional Services as expeditiously as is consistent with professianal skiii and care and the orderly progress of the Work. Upon request af the Owner, the Architect shal( su6mit for the Owner's approval a schedule for ihe performance of the ArchitecYs services which shall be adjusted as required as the Project proceeds, and shail include aflowances for peri- ods o€ ticrre required for the Owner's review and approva! of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdickion over the Project. This schedule, when approved by the t�wner, shall nat, except for reasanabie cause, be exceeded by the Architect. ARTICLE 2 7HE OWNER'S RESPQNS1BtLITIES 2.3 The Owner shai( provide ful( information regarding requirements far th'e Praject including a program, which shall set farth the Owner's design objectives, tonstraints and criteria, inciuding space requirements and relation- ships, flexibifity and expandability, spec'sa! equipment and systems and site requirements. 2.2 !f the Owner provides a budget £or the Project it shall include contingencies for bidding, changes in the Wark during construction, and other costs which are the responsibility of the Qwner, including t�ase described in this Article 2 and in Subparagraph 3.1.2. The Owner shall, at the request of the Architect, provide a statement of funds available for the Project, and their saurce. -- _ — ---- AIA DOCUMEN 6141 • O�VNER-ARCHITECT AGREE,�tENT • THIRTELNTH EDITION � JULY'1977 � AI�� • OO 1977 THE AMERICA INSTITUIE OF ARCHI7ECT5, 1735 NE1Y Yt?RK AVEVUE, N.\'V., WASHtNGTC}N, O.C. 2000G B'i�Z-1977 5 2.3 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a rep- resentative authorized to act in the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or such authorized representative shall examine the documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the pro�ress of the Architect's services. 2.4 The Owner shall furnish a legal description and a certified land survey of the site, giving, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoin- ing property; rights-of-way, restrictions, easements, en- croachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and complete • data pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and full information concerning available serv- ice and utility lines both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. 2.5 The Owner shall furnish the services of soil engi- neers or other consultants when such services are deemed necessary by the Architect. Such services shall include test borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air and water pollution tests, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for determining sub- soil, air and water conditions, with reports and appropri- ate professional recommendations. 2.6 The Owner shall furnish structural, mechanical, chemical and other laboratory tests, inspections and re- ports as required by law or the Contract Documents. 2.7 The Owner shall furnish all legal, accounting and in- surance counseling services as may be necessary at any time for the Project, including such auditing services as the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's AppliCa- tions for Payment or to ascertain how or for what pur- poses the Contractor uses the moneys paid by or on be- half of the Owner. 2.8 The services, information, surveys and reports re- quired by Paragraphs 2.4 through 2.7 inclusive shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. , 2.9 If the Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents, prompt written notice thereof shall be given by the Owner to the Architect. 2.10 The Owner shall furnish required information and services and shall render approvals and decisions as ex- peditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's services and of the Work. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3,� DEFINITION 3.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect. 3.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include at current market rates, including a reasonable allowance for over- head and profit, the cost of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and any equipment which has been de- signed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the Architect. 3.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compen- sation of tlie Architect and the Architect's consultants, the cost of the land, rights-of-�vay, or other �costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Arti- cle 2. 3,2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST � 3.2.1 Evaluations o� the Owner's Project budqet, State- ments of Probable Construction Cost and Detailed Estimates of Construction Cos[, if any, prepared by the Architect, represent the Architect's best judgment as a design professional familiar �vith the construction indus- try. It is recognized, however, that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor, mate- rials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of de- termining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Project budget proposed, established or approved by the Owner, if any, or from any Statement of Probable Construction Cost or other cost estimate or evaluation prepared by the Archi- tect. 3.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be estab- lished as a condition of this Agreement by the furnishing, proposal or establishment of a Project budget under Sub- paragraph 1.1.2 or Paragraph 2.2 or otherwise, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties hereto. If such a fixed limit has been estab- lished, the Architect shall be permitted to include con- tin�encies for design, bidding and price escalation, to de- termine what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Con- tract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Docu- ments alte.rnate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Any such fixed limit shall be increased in the amount of any increase in the Contract Sum occurring after execution of the Contract for Construction. 3.2.3 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase has not com- menced within three months after the Architect submits the Construction Documents to the Owner, any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be ad- justed to reflect any change in the general level of prices in the construction industry between the date of submis- sion of the Construction Documents to the Owner and the date on which proposals are sought. 3.2.4 If a Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost (adjusted as provided in Subparagraph 3.2.3) is ex- ceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated pro- posal, the Owner shall (1) give written approval of an increase in such fixed limit, (2) authorize rebidding or re- negotiating of the Project within a reasonable time, (3) if the Project is abandoned, terminate in accordance with Paragraph 10.2, or (4) cooperate in revising tl�e Project scope and quality as required to reduce the Construction Cost. In the case of (4), provided a fixed limit of Construc- tion Cost has been established as a condition of tl�is Agree- ment, the Architect, �vithout additional charge, shall mod- ify the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to comply AlA DOCUMEI�T 6141 • 0�1'NER-/�RCHITECT AGREEI�IENT • THIRTEEVTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • �11A� • O�777 6 6141-�9%% THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NE1V YORK AVEtvUE, h.�V., 1VASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 with the fix d limit. The providing of such service shall be ' the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from tl�e establishme t of such fixed limit, and having done so, the Architect sh II be entitled to compensation for all services performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the onstruction Phase is commenced. 1 ARTICLE 4 'h � IRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct sal- aries of all t e ArchitecYs personnel en�aged on the Proj- ect, and th portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary c ntributions and benefits related thereto, such as employm nt taxes and other statutory employee bene- fits, insuran e, sick leave, bolidays, vacations, pensions �and similar ontributions and benefits. 1 � ARTICLE 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5.1 Reimb rsable Expenses are in addition to the Com- pensation f r Basic and Additional Services and include actual expe ditures made by the Architect and the Archi- tecYs empl yees and consultants ir, the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following Sub- paragraphs: � 5.1.1 Expe se of transportation in connection with the Project; livi g expenses in connection with out-of-town travel; long distance communicationsj and fees paid for "securing ap roval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 5.1.2 Expe se of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, S ecifications and other documents, excluding �eproductio s for the office use of the Architect and the Architect's c nsultants. 5.�.3 Expe se of data processing and photographic pro- duction tec niques whert used in connection with Addi- tional Servic s. r 5.1.4 If au horized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime w rk requiring higher than regular rates. � . 5.1.5 Expe se of renderings, models and mock-ups re- guested by t e Owner. 5.1.6 Expe se of any additional insurance coverage or limits, inclu ing professional liability insurance, requested by the Ow er in excess of that normally carried by the Architect an the Architect's consultants. ARTICLE 6 P�YMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 6.1 PAYMEf�TS ON ACCOUNT OP BASIC SERVICES 6.�.1 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 14.1 is the minimu payment under this Agreement. 6.1.2 Subs quent payments for Basic Services shall be made mont ly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed wit in each Phase of services, on the hasis set forth in Arti le 14. 6.1.3 If an ro the extent that the Contract Time initially established in the Contract, for Construction is exceeded I or extended through no fault of the Architect, compensa- tion tor any l3asic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in Paragraph 14.4 for Addi- tional Services. 6.1.4 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for such portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on such portions, in actordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph 1�3.2.2, based on (�) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal or, (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost or Detailed Esti- mate of Construction Cost for such portions of the Project. 6.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.2.7 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services as defined in Paragraph 1.7 and for Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Article 5 shall be made monthly upon presentation of the ArchitecYs statement of services rendered or expenses incurred. 6.3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 6.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the ArchitecYs compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the Work other than those for which dhe Architect is held legally liable. 6.4 PROJECT SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION 6.4.1 If the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for more than three months, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed prior to receipt of written notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 10.4. If the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the Architect's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. , ARTICLE 7 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per- taining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accountin� principles and shala be available to the Owner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Dra�vings and Specifications as instruments of serv- ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies, in- cluding reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifica- tions for information and reference in connection with the Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on �sia� • V�vrvEK•ARCHITEC7 AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH ED1710N • JULY'1977 • qIA'� • OO 7977 INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 7735 NEW YORK AV[tJUE, N.bV., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 B141-1977 % other projects, for additions to this Project, or for comple- tion of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the /lrchi- tect. 8.2 Submission or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect's rights. ARTICLE 9 ARBITRATION 9.� All claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construc- tion Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitra- tion Association then obtaining unless the parties mutu- ally agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of or re- lating to this Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional person not a party to this Agreement except by written consent con- taining a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by the Architect, the Owner, and any other person sought to be joined. Any consent to arbitration involving an ad- ditional person or persons shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein or with any person not named or described therein. This� Agree- ment to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional person or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 9.2 Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 9.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 10 •TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.� This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon at least seven days' written notice to the Architect in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. 10.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Ar- chitect, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination date, together with Reimburs- �ble Ex�enses then d�� and all Termination Exp�nsee as defined in Paragraph 1d.4. 10.4 Termination Expenses include expenses directly at- tributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount computed as a percentage of the total Basic and Additional Compensa- tion earned to the time of termination, as follows: .1 20 percent if termination occurs during the Sche- matic Design Phase; or .2 10 percent if termination occurs during the Design Development Phase; or .3 5 percent if termination occurs during ahy subse- quent phase. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11.1 Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. �1.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same mean- ing as those in AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 11.3 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the rele- vant Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Date of Substantial Completion, not later than the date of issuance of the final Certificate far Payment. 11.4 The Owner and the Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consult- ants, agents and employees of the other for damages cov- ered by any property insurance durin� construction as set forth in the edition of AIA Document A201, General Con- ditions, current as of the date of this Agreement. The Owner and the Architect each shall require appropriate similar waivers from their contractors, consultants and agents. ARTICLE 12 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 12.1 The Owner and the Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representa- tives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 13 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT 13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agree- ments, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only 'by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. AIA DOCUMENT 6131 • OWNER•ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY �977 • AIA� • O 1977 8 8141-�9%% THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 � The O { to the � 14.1 � SI 1 � i � 14.2 � 14.2.1 t � �frc� , tfon i ! 14.2.2 z AIA DOt THE AM c AR7ICLE 14 � BASlS QF Ct�MPENSATtON r shall compensate the Architect for the Scope of Services provided, in accordance wikh Article 6, Payments hitect, and the ather Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, as foilows: � INITlAL PAYMENT of NQNE REQUIRED dollars (5 _--- ? ! be rr�ade upon execution of this Agreement and crediied to the C�wner's account as Failows: -� tC COMPE{V5ATEON OR BASIC SERVICES, as desaibed in Parlgraphs 1.1 through 1.5, and any other services included in Article 15 s part of Basic Services, Basic Compensation shall be computed as foltows: -� insert basis o! compensation, inrluding Fised amaunts, multiples or percenWges, and ideneily Phases ta which particular methodx o/ compensa- ipply, i1 necessary.) omper►sation shall be based on eight percent (8k} of the total construction ost as defined in Article 3. bable construction cost has been established as $1,393,5q0. ensatian shall be divid"ed into two (2}�phases: hase 1 compensatian shall include all basic services work as described in rticles 1.1 through 1.4 and shall equal eighty percent (80%) of total com- ensation. (5ee Article 15 for credits to be applied against Phase 1 ompensatian). se 2 campensation sha11 include a11 basic services work as described �n icle 1.5 and shall equal t�denty percent (20l} of total compensaiian. �ere compensatian is based an a Stipulated Sum ar Percentage of Constructian Cast, payments for Sasic t rvices shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 6.1.2, so that Basic Compensation for eath Phase sha!! ual the following percentages of the total Basic Compensation payable: r any addiUonat P6ases as appropriate.) � hematic Qesign Phase: esign Develapment Phase: �nstruction Dacuments Phase: dding or Negotiation Phase: 7nstruction Phase: �78iC4't1[ ( �� °�o) perten# ( 2� °la} percent { 40 °to) percent ( 5 °to? percent ( 20 %) R PRO)ECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BAS1C SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.6, Campensation shall computed separately in accordance with Subparagraph 1.6.2. Bt4S + OtVNER•ARCHtTECT AGREEMENT • 7HIRTEENTN EDI710N • JULY'I9ii � AIA� • p 19�7 lNSTIiUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 17]S NEW YORK AYfNUE, N.1'V., WASHlNGTQN, Q.C. 2Q0O6 8141-1977 4 14.4 COMPENSATlC}N FOR ADDITiONAL SERVICES 14.4.1 FOR ADD1710NAL SERVICES OF THE ARCNfTECT, as described in Paragraph 1.7, and any other services in- cluded in Article 15 as part of Additiona! Services, taut excluding Additiqnal Services of consultants, Compen- sation shall be computed as follows: (Here insert 6asit ol compensation, inctuding rates and;o� mu/tiples ol R�rect Perspnne! fxpense !ot Frincipals and employees. anJ idenlity Principala and ctaxsiJy employees, il required. ldentily speci/ic servicrs to a•hich p�rticul�� methads nl compentation apply, i! necessary.) Principals $50.00%hour Senior pesigner $SQ.00lhour Contract Administration $38.QOJhour Drafting Services $32.00%hour Secretarial Services $18.00/haur � 74.4.2 FOR ADDITlONAL SERV(CES OF CC3NSULTANTS, inciuding additiona! structura(, mecha�ical and efectricai engineering services and those provided under Subparagraph 1.7.21 or identiFied in Article 15 as part of Addi- tional Services, a multiple of Otle { 1. 0 � times the amaunts biiled to the Architect for such services. f(dentily specilic types of consuhants in Artide 15, rf rer�uired.l 14.5 FOtt REiMBURSABLE EXPEN5ES, as described in Artic(e 5, and any other items included in Article 1S as Reim- bursable Expenses, a multiple of Otie ( 1. a } times the amounts ex- pended by the Archikect, ihe ArchitecYs employees and consultants in the interest of the Projecc. 94.6 Payments due the Architect and unpaid under this Agreemeni shall bear interest from the date paymenk is due at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof, at the fegal rate prevailing at the principal piace of business of the Architect. (Hete i»sert any rete of interest agreed upon.} tUsury /aws and requirements under the fe�eral Truth in tending Att, s+na(ar atatc and loca/ condunrer crcdrt lau•; and othe� mgutationc at tbe OwneYs and Archuec['s p�inc;paf piaces at busrness, the location o! the Project anJ elsewhe�re may affect the validrty of this prnvisinn. Specific /�gat advice should he o6taincd with respect ro dciction, modi(rcation, or othcr rcquJroments su�h as 4vritie�n drstfosures nr tivait•rrs.) 14.7 The Owner and the Architect agree in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement that: 1�.7.1 IF THE SCOPE of the Praject ar of the Architect's Services is changed materially, the amounts of campensatian shaH be equitably adjusted. 14.7.2 IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agreement have nat been completed within twenty-four (24� months of the date hereof, through no fault of the Architect, the amounts of campensation, rates and multiples set forth herein shall be equitabfy adjusted. AIA DOCUMHNT 6141 • OLVNER•ARClil7ECT AGREEtiiEN7 • THiRTEENTtI EDt7ION • JULY 19i7 • AIA� • fl 1977 �O B��i'I-'Igi% TNE AMERIGAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHiTECiS, �735 NE�V YORK AVENUE, N.1V., tiVASHING70N, D.C. 20006 15.2 I 15.3 ].5.4 AIA 7HE � t n ARl'tCLE i5 C?THER CQNDiT1Qi�15 QR SERVICES Article 1.5.4 shall be amended to provide for Architects on-site project review with Owner`s Representative at intervals of not less than once per week. Article 5.1.1 shall be amended ta exclude cost of transportation wi.t�iin the metropolitan St. Pau1/Minneapolis area and long distance communicatians, Article 8- Delete this Article in its entirety, Owner shall, at their aptian, have possession and awnership af a11 origina7 drawings and t specification masters. Architects shall, at their expense, be permitted ta retain repraducible copies of drawings and specifications. • It shall be understood that the City of Mendota Heights shall be credited the sum of Four Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty ($4,750} Doilars against Phase I compensation, Article 14.2.�_�•This credit shall be as. defined in previous architectural services cantract between the City of Mer�dota Ne�ghts and Lindberg Pierce, Inc. , 6141 • QWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMEN7 + THtRTEENTH EDIFlON •�ULY 7477 • AIA� • cQ 7977 IIVS7ITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 2735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W„ WASNINGTON, D.C. 20005 B�4i-i977 11 This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER ARCHITECT CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS LINDBERG PIERCE, INC. 750 South Plaza Drive 11-�� • ■- �1 Y1 � BY 600 First Avenue North, Suite 710 � . - .,� � �_ � 1 : /�/�� / � AIA DOCUMENT B741 • OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT • THIRTEENTH EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIA� • pO 'I977 �Z ST�i�-�9%% THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, '1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 Ltn'dberg Pierce, Inc. Su te 710 60 First Ave, North Mi neapolis, Minnesota 55403 (61 } 332-3339 Q J�,nuary 13, 1987 Architects James H. Lindberg Robert L. Pierce C' ty of Mendc�ta Fieights 7 Q South Plaza Drive M ndota Heights, MN 5512Q A tention: Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Administrator e City Hall Project Budget � D ar Mr. Frazell: � T is letter is in response to our conversations regarding e tablishment of a total project budget for the praposed new C ' ty Hal I. . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. following item� ar� not included in the normal • tructian phase bu.dget and must be budgeted separately. Site Survey: (Assumed to be furnished by City Engineering staff) Additianal sai.I borings $2,000 Construction materialsjsoiZ aampaction testing (as an option this cauld be included in Constructian Contract, although we would prefer testing as independent item) $5,000 5ewer ,Availability Charges (SAC} - undeter- minedjallowance $6,000 Phone system: (Difficult to determine at this stage - greatly varies with "bell� and whistle�i optians}. Al1ow A. Mavable interior furnishings budget {Allowance) B. Furnishings consultant fee Office machines/computer system: $20,000 $75�000 $ 7,5Q0 Na estimate s � e � Mr. Kevin Frazell City of Mendota Heights January 13, 1987 Page Two �. 8. A. Building permit costs No estimate B. Water meter cost �-• C. Water hook-up charges The dollar amounts indicated are to be considered preliminary at this stage of the project and must be re-evaluated as the project progresses and gains better definition. Sincerely, ��C�� , Robert L. Pierce , � PROJECT BUDGET MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY HALL 298 Cash Budg�t Sou ce _ City Hall Sinking Fund Arc itect's Fee - Phase I Pri ting - Plans and Specs Soi Baring� Con ingency/Miscellaneaus Total manent Project Financing struction-Cantract hitect's Fee - Phase II struction Materials/ oils Compaction Testing Charges ne System cellaneaus Charges and ees Total Total Project Budget $8�, 434 �% ?4� �o � 1,200 2,OQ0 7, 36& (,� yoo $�� i'v� p 0 0 � � S� Oov $1, �,.�A�9. ✓ •, ^cz=a-^�-�- j "'7 S ti o 5,aoo 6,OQ0 20,000 10,000 4=, ^�� I� 3 o'Q"f S'o a -�,-�.�.,.:��- �' j 3 f r, s on � Adopted by the City Council on January 20, 198'7 , _ _. .. , a o ; i CTTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � JA�tUARY I4 , 19 8 7 TO Mayor, Ci�y Council and City ��Erator FR M: Mary Ann DeLaRasa � Deputy Clerk � CT: Gommissian Appointments As requested at the January 6 Cauncil meetiang, attached pl ase find a map indicating the approximate residences of �he P1 nning Commi�sion and Park and Recreation Commission members. As you ma� recall, Planning Cammissianer Bill Frank is not se king reappointment and parks Commi�sianer Mary Jeanne Schneeman is not interested in serving another �hree year term: CounciZ wi 1 remember �hat Parks Chairman Jim Stein has indicated a wi lingnes� to serve an the Cammission only until after a Parks bo d referendum is campleted, therefore a second vacancy on the Pa ks Commissian will be created by his early re�ignatian sametime th s Spring or Summer. . re: i I , We have received letters of interest from the follawing idents {copzes of which you have received previously): Mr. PauZ Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane - Planning Cammissian Ms. Vicki Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane - Parks Commission Mr. Robert Emery, 1183 Dodd Road - Planning Commission Mr. Darre2l Straumann, 20I2 Summit Lane - ezther Commission If any further letters are received priar to Friday afternoan, th y will be attached for your review and consideration. As was the case I.ast year, there are again no Parks Co issioners living south of TH 110. There are three Planning Co issioners sauth o� Tii 120. 5tai� anticipates a letter from Mr. Charles Bangesser requesting consideratian for the Park� Co ission. Mr. Bangesser lives in the Copperfield Additi.on, and if he were ta be appointed, his appaintment would he1.p alleviate th prablem of no representation for the Parks Cammi�sion in the sa thern portian o� the City. TON REQUIRED• Council should cansider the applicants and make one new ap ointment to each af the Commissions, ��f2C'�IVE February 1, 19 ?. attlachment E e CITY OF MEND�TA HEIGHTS MEMO DECEMBER 18, I986 TO: Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator FROM: Mary Ann DeLaRasa, Deputy Clerk � SUBJECT: Commis�ion Appointments/Terms of Expiration The following i� a list of City Commission rnembers, their original dates of appointment and their terms of expirations. PLANNING COMMISSSdN NAME ADDRESS APPOTNTED EXPIRES Jerry Morsan, CHAIR I442 G7achtler , 7-20-82 1-32-88 Dorathy McMonigal 703 - 2nd Avenue 2-01-85 1-31-88 John Frank 774 Lower Colonial 4-01-78 2-31-87 Stuart I3enning 532 Huber Dri.ve 4-17-84 1-31-87 Sandra Krebsbach 1832 Twin Circl.e 2-01-86 I-3i-89 Ultan Duggan 825 Fiazel Court 2-01-86 2-31-89 Bill Burke 707 Decorah Lane 2-01-8Q 1-3I-89 PARK C4MMISSTON Jim Stein, CHAIR Mary J. Schneeman Carol Damberg Bev Lachenmayer Robert Lef�ert ,Rabert Doffing Marsha Knittig ,. 1752 James Rd. 792 Upper Colonial 975 Caren Road 1253 Culligan Ln. 669 Maple Park Dr. 1900 Twin Circle 524 Staples i-z.�-$a 2-01-81 5-2I-85 �.a-zl-s� 2-Q1-85 9-15-81 2-01-83 1-3I-87 Z-31-$? I.-3I-88 �.-�i-s$ 1-3I-89 1-31-89 ].-31-89 # , , `� � , ` � _ LANNING COMMISSIONER r.-,:�'+�. ..-,-.,•..— =.-,�.� . .�--�*� •:.��:�- � -�.. - P ;�, .. "' . _�y: "_,F-`"= s� ' . ' 1f.�.-.,----:-"i.�= ,.•� .f.- �,r.,. � = � _% '•f , •`,�_..�,=��=�_yr� � �Q 5SI4NER ' - f -� ; � � : ' �''�:.::� - = PARK �_ �•'.. /,�'. /•`s.r:,: -- - ;�<,:";�''• �-.;:�=. t E " � . � � :" .•. -• �=°" '' �=.'�`._; .='- f j. - � �_,' .r.. = KA.TZ s 1$ 5 iit7NTER i�AN �, r:�.=� '4' ,/,� ,:,:.. � � �,� ', ..,• �.;,,1` ~~,,�,.,,_��-`:r_. �� -t Ls • .,, : •. y - _ .__ .i ' ,'''- • �s- STRA , 2Q12 St3MMIT LANE / 1��.�''� f .�4_t`=,o ✓' �-i �"' :t� ,�._..'—*1��::rr� c� {�,LERY APPLICANT) �•� � f=�'' =J : � ,';�¢�,�_ ,1. J� �',.�. ��;�4�H�'''. .r----�--...�..,,_.,j,-. _ , 1 $3 DODD ROAD il'C , . t , yt yr'.: ' ��:f �b,;. ,�,�: ,�•� �'"� F �: •�`'`�.:--: �� ' l.��i ; ^a.�o� �:^i��t�- '"�'f`� G�ct �.'P"� ' _.. ' `, ,. ��'=•�'° ' f 1 S, _ • ,-'��= �..3 y-sr. � , • __—i•= �...C-:=.:.-+(+--,= �„��.��-�y�•"',.: � ` ` ,t,�.:. � �.�. � BITRTON ANDERSON, 643 Sibley Hwy. P(�-� �=' s--�"-�,` ,, ,.;�•"�- . -��.� -�°� �� .;�,y� :� �.,,+.._ !� � � r � �,i �" � �""4 . , • �.�r+''1�� ' � ,. �,y�,� r' �: �:�r � . .t:� ,� t .�- ` { '';•K, •�-��;..�;��,_,�!i ' .�,` ti. _. - ----•- ----- - - � -- %• ll�li iE t t. :� :'4,'"'�`'. Crt� �� ,, : �'.�=:L ..t � �.: � , a. ,,�� , t� `� ,�%// a v -=.� • •'' •��'+ir. 'r:• w�o.i � 'y,��'" � ;IT --1 I ��-� ' ��" �"yr '.; :. ...�°'�-=y". r,; � .r � ., ( �1i� ! i: �� <<.� t' . � .+'y -•j. ` K•,".IF` ��. • • •:•�%'"'�.''. � OE` ` r /. /.+� ' ' �, . `�,;;r,=..�-� •��'.�'�, - 4 �s L.,..,-� �/, :�� :j �� ,.u�:'i"_: `h�'�,��: �`.aoc�.c • � ._., �-r w - ,,,,�ir,.^ ,�..�._+. • `• ' -� -�� - � Y. y •� .� t _ , -*""�' � ..i . � ii f' �' '"'�arn.' %!' _ ' '� i � �C` '�.: sai �. ��.i=ac=�': ` ' � -' y �� i�,�.,�.'�t•� --�'�r. ""'`�T. 1 �,�, � ,� 7v� �'�� i 1i �-y.+---- �. ' •\ j ,� •�� - � 3 - �r .'._.._ `Y ��- // �.L-� C „�,� � � w ,/. ' \1. \ ' r+ , 7 �j�. ^:a �_� �y f \ d^ / ( .� ` } � � ~ � � - � ( �... �: _ _. . .._ .—,--- � _._.. - - ' � -1! r1%/^,l (� 1:� .,',�+,,,��"�: a• ,��:.i::�(�'• . •� ' • . .•i..�'..� 'i ^ • ' • r/ ��" ,ut'' � �� .. � .+. .�s.rs�- 'r: , . -'- ... � � %� � , � '�- ' ��, ",`•+-`�1,F: � �+�„r, �. i..�r.� ft�� •j `` ` �� .>...., t._. -- � �� ,;. � d =.: � � �. ` �a��' f' i _ ,�er;;.. � ;�-- _ � �_• ...� .,," i � �•,...,�� . . _ .o. �o�.,, ��. -•-�' - - .y?f4¢%' , •�"i � � t . `�! '' .��--.��'''.��, ^�� •� - i o� ., ,�� `i � ed :ii.��.,' • �-^. , Y� � .. �" i�.� ".�,�:�� j � ` .4 � ��.. , •� 1�' ♦. ' _ _ �_,.,�,�,.___ I- � _ �e—' j� �i; . • , t �r ,.+t�� 4l� 1� �� ;' . ' . . . � F !.. � ' ��' /«._� .� ' � �D j i � ! „"�yR � ��..n,..� .,i _ f',I/. r-sw� � \, �- '�� ----�--�=--+-;.._=7 +�,�.! .� � ; L,' i--= . �r�' � �� , - i �� j''' � 1'�� ` ��, � �.__-- "' � s`' �� .� - "' - �' � ti•'� : u�- � -_- r,�� - ��u e ''� " � � `�� 1 " `�• i ;,: � �' , r - 1. »�`- . _ , '4 � • • , h�• ..,.•t.i.i ':'-i" ��v • ':;� i.�+^t .L�• �"�" e ( �i -1�-t' ��,-'— �. t � ' � --•� . z+� �' � �....�...�,._y - w " ' �" . �• .L� F t_^ .;":" * � _ �� . ...., . �. • ` , • S�t � � i 9 ;,. �• '�r,.., ' .r. ",.-..-:-.--.-.-.y � _- � g,` r/„�/r r '::"- •''•.�c:`'`g'._`;'Ij � ;�i' �'T :�:�i-•-•�, i,� � c:-1� �� : r.'. ; •• w`(�� e� � 1 \"'� •' :� -..�y'„�i , r �.. �,,,j�.�� • � i �� '. '.�t.��. ,`�.; • . 1 � ,j �! , s ' �,- • '^+�;. : • ��'`_ rF� � � '��s... � � � � r y:^v -�': ..•' �. �jl ' t, , ( r � � i��-i'____I � , _S_�..!fg..._ ✓ 'fi, � ._.. ...�:s: :.: '� ..�,� y ,�r^ ..�� .i.l.�' .��•_��_ . r ��-'- ;�_. �7 r, -.---;..�.. _`_' U. - ."-^" ,� � , ,,��{;r^4, � �'ri� `� ;�' �. • , i,y.Y.r- !: %• �.+-- , -'"f � '�^ :._.� . k •�,,,/ �� . " � i i =.• P r�'4' �; ''.�aOdfr�� *i�: � 1' t �• •'� `• � . � 1 � � i•� _ : M' �� .-^'�'�/.'.' � e " '�Y•*�r� �` :1' i � � � _, :e3 ._.. i ,/ . �'1 � t t� �/l, , � ,r ' ,�• � •' ' E w� � �` I�� r_�..r , : ,r:. • i M '.�t .': � ��./', � `� '. ��„ . . J �� Q' �,l1��'.� - w�'^. � .�� 4r ?� � � •� � J T.1 � i �.� • � n�,Sy� .A-. . 7�� ' '/.ao0 ��i' .f 'I �1 /I' '},71�L�..,�`+n I I � ��.� � + � " '� � , • j t �, � ` � • ,y : ;/ , ,�� ,. • 1 .�„'. �� r �-,R"'�'a�""`�.'�; . � � � ��y„ ` � � * �. _ ; i .' ' t _.. , _._. ., � 1T'. � . 1 '�' • �,,, ��== ,/ `i+:,/"`s;, "� a.l. � , . '"` � . � .i. �� '•:/ / .-=, .+: ,�� .. ... .i�� :: , v M ��, � �''i,arf..• �� • .�++ • +� •� � - '� . •�� i .M"� ( . =..1 ,1�%��,,�,�� ' . :l • •. ........ _ ,' .' �,�,, rt�l•!; t��"�t'.'��, r � ,• i � __ ' �� _ '1 ' ' ��^�"' _ '�.-`�' � .li• .I.i., j1�:�+,' _ �__ -.�,�^ ' ' � •~ + ' -�.-r..-�..�?;�_; ^��'�t��. ��.�•-.!`r"'- ' �#'i+ -1'_' ��'_' w � c � s w r - � r R��.�. � i i�� . i�� f'' �r � i � ` � ♦ i�_ �,/` ,'�=�+a� �_. .1 • • . � � t�-�..�= `�= ' �,,,'' � t 1 ..rw�. .v �+r . a� n� ar � � - ' .. •}� � � � �''� .. . . � .....� . �� . ,� 1 i' � � � , \ �.__.... ` ; ..,;_.. �., . � �.��.} �. 1 `' `w r-} 4�+ � jT J � ~ i/ ,�a..: �j r-r..=-'14� � ♦ �F v � t -._...^ � � � �� *w t. ^1 � � i � 1 I + �\� It ' pi-.�: S$ .�� . � . !X: � ( �� .�.�.��• 4. .•J R . •w' ��"�i.i • � �`\ �{� . y � �'� �.\ �!� + , . : } +:. � �'� /' ' .a: * ' �� ` � �, - y.�, �---~'L• . ip� .i � �' +y� y . � �.�n 3 .� � . t.. .�._. �-.._.-rt--':'�'�',"..^.�6 // - `/�i 1 �! .L:.� y '� � i 6 � y : � ��;. .�� :..�.,`.. . � _ � ;�. .. - � n ' ` ;�•-t' �\ r r' i� -.1 M 1' �Ji� ...,,_ ■ .' � • s 2' � I � ' " ' � 1 � 1 �/ 1 'i%'�' ' � ��f �:T � � ,. {�- . :�-� -t � ,:,:. , , r , -��:-. r �v�{� ; 1� . ,- � � , � h��:; � � .i�:.�. �-� ;� :�. � , ; .�::�=- e s' � _,s ..,... � _ . • �_._ ' . , + : � '_ o+ + �: ~ -T- -„t-'5---_ `�'r' �`''"'�,:i � � L.r7v . �. .�� +. r_ • f � � i . • � , ' : t,. . ' ,Rs.,, y_„�. � ( �y ✓ '�... � i �M � I ! � 1 , .�.� �i.�....- ri �t{.. .p:; �:��,�„,�1� i 'y�.�� '-� - �F , S�"�.a.`.TT`�i �r � ' � '"�,F'?�,:+_ �� t1f ,� •��',' f•�• '<�r` iZ'tv � .�:.�' .E • _r; ,�;.y�'� t � , . ,a�'� ; ;� ,}.r {� �w=,^'_�s - �� %`� l_.. •..1 � � i; yt'�w-• . CT `�y ;::,�� . � : J' tj7`� X"' �. � ...%r - „�.:-.=.rr--*-:"" •�i"..:._:.`.•p, g�J • � „`�� i�� ,� ' ��• . _ ti F� �_ ."� �i � � j i �..�,-s.�'v'� �''^'J,a► : �..... . .�..•..e.�., S ��_-y,,,tiy.r'-�,j_;:.'2' f �'. y �3" , � � • i ,,- u tY'� '�" d ,� ( f -- � ... ..._ ;�: �_ : � .:I ._'�:.�'" �_� ��. ' � �' f u:-.�'� `; i '�.� ��'��' "�� `-��"^-,;,,�'=.._.$: ��:�L�'»�%::•�� t 2,.�3'' � �' .� `��,, . � � -« � ,{ � — _ � _ �; {{. -�..,;: <• , ,{ .. � �_ t - � . � •� � i; � j t�-�-"�M--�-'r-. � -� �� ,�''�`�v).^•'; , ° ` /,�.-, ..,,�:'��_..��. ��.: i ;.' �a.,.�, `��,,� P � ' .•^'� � � !.� l: ., � =�s; �� "' : ,. j: l.�_1r� i ,�d �'�1%y:�X, "., ^"""�"'_ 1 ! L"'+ i' � 1 �. . .! • ' ' 1-�..`� - r, �_� �,� �� 1 ' .�+ �,�.��.—�—� � „1�.�...�� .�.�-TC� "'�',; '��= �i�"^"S� } � • � ,,Y.K� h�. •� �I .,�'�'i `_��:-' '. � �:�1 i ;' ?:: ��..s- : �t; s. �. ; � �'-- ;�,-�..t'�'� ` . . �\ .,�.`ti�;`4 � � !+ r ;�'s �- - - -- -- _ ._. :. t . �� _ . i, CITY OF MEND07A HEIGHTS MEMO SANUARY 1b, S0: Mayor, ity Councit and City A' i� r *4 FROM: Mary nn DeLaRosa, Deputy City Clerk �UBJECT: R uest for Appointment to Planning Cortmission j Mr. Bu tan D. Anderson, b43 Sibtey Memaria[ NighwaY, ��, telephoned ity Offices this morning to request cansideration of appointment to the Planning Comnission. Ne submitted a letter of �equest tas January, and asked that the same letter be subttsitted for Council conside�ation again this year. Mr. Ande�son will be preserst Tue day evening. � Attach please find h•is tetter from last year, date�d January 14, 1486. � � AGTIQN RE4U RED: � Caunci shauld consider this additional request and make an ia000intment to the Ptanning Camnission. 4attachment 1 f l 0 a 6URTON ANOERSQN JANET Fl M T1M4THY J. MANAHAN I.AW qFFICES OF BURTt?N D. ANDERSflN & ASSOClATES ONE APPLETREE S�UARE, SUITE 940 $E.00tuSiNGTON. MlNNESOTA 55420-2414 January 14, 1986 Mendo a Heigh�s City Council City aIl 750 S uth Plaza Drive Mendo a Heights, Minneso�a 55120 a Dear �ouncil Members: ,��,�� . � �9�6 TELEPHONE: 654�6376 AREA CQDE 812 This etter is sirnply to inform �'ou tha� I am intex:ested in the possi ili�y af si�ting as a valunteer on the Mendota Heights Planning Commission. It is my understanding from reading Iocal news "aurnals that there are apparently �ome op�nings on the Commi sion at this time. I re have a�.to have Minn So ut resi rega brin ide at 643 Sibley Memorial Highway in Mendota Heights, and owned that residence since 1978. I have been a practicing ney, pri.marily doing li�igatian work since 1973, and also Bachelor and Masters Degrees from the University of sota. I am a native Minnesotan and was born and raised in Minneapolis. I have very much enjoyed the time I have ed in Mendota Heigh�.s and hold our community in very high d. I would hope, that my experience and background might something af value to the Planning Commis�ion. I�, �ter reviewing this let�er, you would �eel interested in purs ing this matter fur�her with me, I will certainly make myse f available to you ior that purpose. Very� �rulY Ya�s, Burt n,`i� Anderson jrnb/ 772J � , _ � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 15, 1989 � T0: Mayor, City Council and City in�a r FR M: Klayton Eckles Civil Engineer SU JECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Park Place Job No. 8625 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 12 DI CUSSION: Staff has received an escrow deposit from the Halley Developers for th cost of producing a feasibility report for the Park Place Subdivision. Th y have requested staff to complete a study of the costs involved with se ving the proposed Park Place development. In addition to a feasibility reoort it will be necessary to call a ublic hearing for this project due to the fact that several adjacent pr perty owners will be receiving improvements as part of this project. DATION: Staff recommends that Council accept the petition and order the pr paration of the feasibility report. AC ION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with staff recommendation they should pass a motion ad pting Resolution No. 87- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PR PARATI�N OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SANITARY SEWER; WATER,�STORM SEI�ERS AND ST EETS TO SERVE PARK PLACE AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT NO 12) � . � City of Mendota �eights Dakota Coun�y, Minnesota RES4LUTION N0. 8k�- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREFARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, S'PORM SEWERS AND STREETS TO SERVE PARK FLACE AND ADJACENT AREAS (TMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT Np. 12) � WHEREAS, a petition has been filed wi.th the City Council requesting sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and street impravements to serve Park Place and ad- jacent areas. NOW THEREE'QRE, TT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City af Mendata �Iea.ghts, Minneso�a, as follaws: l, That �he abave described petition be and is hereby accepted by the City Council of the Ci.ty of Mendota Heights. 2. That �Che City Engineer be and is hereby au�horized and directed to prepare a£easibility study as ta whether saic� proposed improvements are feasible, whether said �mpravements shoul.ci best be made as praposed or in connection with some other improvement, and as to the estimated cast of said improvemen�. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2Qth day af January, 1987. CITY COUNCIL CI'TY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E, Mer�ensotto, Mayar ATTEST: Mary Ann DeLaRasa , Deputy Clerk Y• � TO: � FRO � SU CITY CF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 8, 198� �/ i � Mayor, City Council and C��Ad�t�istrator t: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer . Building Permit Approval Rec�.zest for 1150 Highway 110, Centre Pointe Health Care Clinic SSZON 4 Leonard Lampert, architect far Baptist Hospital Fund., " In ., has su.bmi.tted the required drawings and letter of , re est for Council. review and approval of a building parmit. � (S e attached drawings). : The project as proposed will' be a one story, 8,780 sq. ft. health care clinic facility, The clinic will be ' co �tructed on Lot 3, Block 2, Yorkton Centre Pointe Sauth � P1 t. TION Staff has reviewed the drawings submitted and finds them to be in campliance with City cades and ardinance� and would � re ammend Gouncil approval of the building permit subject to ; st �'f review o� complete plans and specifications. • AC SON REQUIRED . � If Council wishes to imp],ement the staff recommendation ta approve the requested building permit, it shc�uld pass a mo ion of appraval subject to staff review o� complete plan an sp�ciiications. 3 s kkb 0 f� Leonard La�pert Architects P. A. 430 First Av Minneapolis, Phone 6: North 55401 6 January 1987 Mr. Charles Mertensotto, t�iayor Council Members Ms. Janet Blesener Mr. Carl Cummins III Mr. John Hartmann Ms. Elizabeth Witt City Of Mendota Heights 750 So. Plaza Drive Mendota Heights Mn. 55120 Mr. Mayor and Council Members: On behalf of Baptist Hospital Fund Incorporated, 642 East 7th Street, St. Paul Mn. 55106, we are pleased to submit Centre Pointe Health Care Clinic for your review of our building permit application. The development of this clinic will provide the Mendota Heights community several professional medical groups practicing in a wide variety of health care areas. Housed in the clinic will be family care groups as well as internal medicine specialists. In working with City staf�, we have develo�ed a site plan consistent with B.H.F. Inc. goals and ihe successful develop- ment of Mr. Larry Lee's overall project, Yorkton Centre Pointe South. The building design utilizes the concept of the family care services, internal medicine services and r.iedical support clustering around a central waiting area. The exterior image of the building�is that of a high quality brick professional center with radiused building corners and recessed areas. ' The development of this clinic does offer significant opportunity to the community. We look forward to tYie realization of this opportunity. Sinc rely s, Leonard La pert, AIA higlnvay 1(0 south service �oad tl mpYl Archlt«l� P.A. .a na �...� n..��.n. rx oia r� o�iw x.•n� �,.. �.��nu ton:••�• r. �u . nuc ��.�.• � .. � �ini:.�sr. .��.,.�u.�o •�m txt i :n u .:.:iwii �• u�a um�u�w.wM �., a o 0 �� a e �� a �� y N Q,% ^ v A� r o� � w�s� � � �° � �Yorkton Develo�pment ;'`•,`. � � l�;;� :-•�;° �� 4 � ' : - IHi Ud�eMl� A�ewe. St. P RIIV SSIN i�,' ., `"� s' �' S YORKTON LTD Is (612) 484-9000 � , .. . . � ; " ; � . � El t . 'r. � . �� NTRE P(�INTE Yorkton Develo ment � H LTH CA3�E CLTNIC � K„ ��b Anue, S�. �� u�.. ��. W M OTA HEI�HTS m�ixra+ Lrn �(617J 484-90U0 s=--- � �e o S . . : J CAR� LINIC I� Yorkton Develo�pment 1698 Ud�enll� Are��e. St. P MN 5516/ � HEIGHTS YORHTON LTD t�e (612) 484-9000 � un— •mmranwr m DDDDDDDD 3_ E 3 I '. .. cR� .. . ' ♦ S � tl � < � � t � Yorkton Develo�ment `"'"�""' :°`"';"':""" .w �..r u.. cuu.r.�in.0 ..��,.:�. �K�.,d,. IH� Udmtll� A�ew�, SL MN SSIM ��amw�� voaeron ��v �� (612) 484-9000 a�. •�Wr�,...�.. TO: DIS CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor, City Council Paul R. Berg, Code January 7, 1987 and City A �i�i�rator � Enforcement Officer CT: Building Permit Fee Schedule SION The time is near for the 1985 Uniform Building Code and its appendices to be adjusted by the state and then put into pla e by municipalities. I do not foresee any problems with thi process and I will be submittirig for�Council review and app oval the-ordinance for the new codes. There is one point that I think Council should be aware of ith this code adoption process, it centers around the bui ding permit fee schedule in the 1985 Uniform Building , ...,.�r . The reason for pre approval of the new fee schedule, is so hat when the model adoptive ordinance is submitted for Cou cil approval, the fee schedule can be listed in the ado tion form. � � I think the best way to demonstrate the fee increase is to how 1982 verses 1985 fees on an average valuation of $12 ,300.00. The 1982 fee schedule would have a$488.00 bui ding permit fee and a$31•.7.20 plan check fee for a total . of 805.20. The 1985 fee schedule would have $716.50 : bui ding permit fee and a$465.73 plan check fee for a total of 1,182.23. The total dollar increase would be $377.03 on thi particular valuation amount. If we experience the same level of buildinc� permit business in 1987 as we did in 1986 we could anticipate col ecting $64,807.00 or approximately a 47% increase of the 198 fee schedule over the 1982 fee schedule,. f » It isn't mandatory that we use the current building code schedule. The fee schedule is optional for any municip lity enforcing the Uni�orm and State Building Code. Same ad'acent municipalities are already charging the 1985 fee sch dule, some are going to change the 1982 fee schedule and yet others�are going to phase in the 1985 fee schedule in two and three part increments aver the canstruction year of 1987. Th North Star Chapter of Building Officials has recentl taken a survey on this matter and the re�ults were that 2� of the 30 communities that were palled will be adoptin Table 3A of the 1985 Uniform Building Code. w ON I ould recommend that we follow suit with the 24 out o� 30 co nities (80%} and adopt Table 3A o� the 1985 Uniform Buildi Code as saon as the State has completed its adaption process of the 1985 Uniform Buildin� Gode and its appendices. The increase af fees will also help support paying �or an a�sistant buildin� inspector for the summer if it ecomes necessary as it did last year. ACTION REQUIRED I Council wishes to implement the s�aff recommendation to ado t Table 3A of the 1985 Uniform Building Code, it should pass a matian o� approval. PRB : F1 TO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO ry 16, 198? � � Mayor, City Council, and City ��tor �� ,, Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer . CT: Sewer Utility Billings HI$TORY: Beginning last year, we were faced with a major problem in th Sewer Utility as our meter readings from MWCC increased dr matically in the adjustments from 1984 final cost allocations. Ai ng with this, our current volume was also increased to reflect th hicther level. Last year (1985), we recognized the problem with a mid-year 25° rate increase to meet the 1986 payments, recognizing that an ad itional increase would be necessary for 1987. The budget, as pr pared, indicated a rate increase of some 40% to meet the bill fo 1987. In 1985, our billing was reduced by $35,000 to �eflect the fi st payment on the Mendota sewer line. The adjusted bill which is to be paid in 1987 eliminates this credit due to the fact that th final agreement was not yet signed. The credit was put in the Utility Reserve Fund. For 1987, we could apply the credit to our billing and reduce MWCC expense to $565,000. With receipt of the final 1987 billings, we have been trying to roject the billings for 1988 and 1989 which we might expect fro MWCC. The projections are shown on the attached sheet. We hav generally confirmed these projections with MWCC. the S: After receiving the billing for 1987 and the projections for next two years, we appear to have two choices for action: l. Proceed with the budget plan and effect a 40% increase as of January, 1987, with the hope that tighter enforcement of sump drains will produce some additional revenue and a modest rate reduction could be considered for 1988. 2. Gamble based on projections for 1988 and 1989 and reduce the increase to 20/25% which together with sump drain enforcement, will produce a loss of about $65,000 for 1987, but enable us to make up the loss in 1988 and 1989 if our estimates are correct and we have some success in replacement of sewer lines where major inflow is CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO prevalent. If our projections on volume are reasonably correct, the billings should substantially catch up with 1987, and 1988 should reflect the last of the catch-up. With the MWCC budget corrections continuing at the current level, we would be out of the woods in 1988. � At a meeting Friday, January 16, with Ray Odde of MWCC, we explored the metering and inflow problems which we have. He indicated the MWCC would be willing to cap our 1986 volume at or near 550,000,000 gallons, plus future SAC additions until firm metering can be accomplished. This would strongly support a current increase in the 20% range for our user charges. MWCC will install test meters within the next two weeks to attempt to get better volume readings. A permanent solution is included in their budget but will be at least a year away. The Sewer department has identified two areas where pipe replacement would be cost effective. However, until we can have confidence in the MWCC meter readings, it does not seem worthwhile spending the money. The MWCC concurs with this appraisal. ACTION REQUIRED: Recommend which action to follow for sewer rate increases. By April, 1987, we should have a good feel for our 1988 charges as we should know 1986 volume and final costs by that time. LES:madlr attachment MWCC HISTORY & PROJECTION EST. BILLING PAID Year Gallons Rate/Mil. Billed Gallons Bill 1984 395 $766 $302,800 1985 400 786 314,381 FINAL COST ALLOCATION For Two Years Previous Actual Rate/Mil. Gallons Gallons Bill 1986 520 807 419,490 516 657 $339,278 1987 575 826 474,883 569 703 400,470 1988 580est. 850 est. 493,000 est. 570? est. 750 est. 427,500 est. 1989 590est. 875 est. 516,250 est. 580 est. 775 est. 449,500 est. 580 est. 800 est. 464,000 est. * Credit reversal due to sale agreement not signed until, 1986 in the amount of $35,000. SEWER SYSTEM PROJECTID REVENUE BASE Est. Rev @ ' Year 0� Users Est. Rev. 207•Increase 1986 2290 $430,000 1987 2395a $535,000 1988 2500b 562,000 1989 2585d 585,000 RateJQtr. $22.00 min. 26.50 min. 26.50 min. 26.50 min. a- 100 new homes in 1986 plus commercial. b- 100 new homes in 1987 plus commercial. c- MWCC bill less $35,000 credit plus $40,000 operating expense. d- 75 new homes in 1988 plus commercial. e-estimated MWCC bill plus $40,000 operating expense. f- est. MWCC bill plus $40,000 operating expense Adjustment Actual Final Bill , $260,909 266,731 $ 37,478 456,000 ('84 final +'86 est. bill) 121,090* ,595,000 ('85 final + '87 est. bill) 8,510 est. Pd. '88 501,000 est. ('86 final +'88 est. bill) 25,383 est. Pd. '89 � 491,000 est. ('87 final +'89 est. bill) 29,000 est. i Average Residential Billing $1I7.50 142.00 142.00 142.00 M4TCC & Operating Expense $600,OOOc 545,OOOe 530,OOOf CURRENT USER CHARGES . Present 207 Increase Min. Quarterly Bill $22.00 $26.50 Vol, excess of 20.100 cu.ft. 90C 1.10 Average annual charge resid. 118.00 142.00 1 a 0 CITY OF �IENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO JAl� TJARY 15 , 19 8 7 TO Mayor, City Cauncil and City ��r��y��tor � :.�'"�� • FR M. Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer SU ECT: Tax Anticipation Certificates HI$TORY In recent years, we have used Tax Anticipatian C2�I.f1Cr'�'t{�S to supplement cash flaw and increase net interest earnings �ar �he Ge eral Fund. The new Tax Reform Act has made �ome changes in the ca culations used in determining the amaunt af such certificates th t can be issued. It wauld appear based on preliminary ca culations, that we should be able to issue between $425,000 and $4 Q,000 in I987. We shoui.d be able to realize about $12j13,000 ne gai.n o� interest an this amount. ON REQUIRED Request infarmal interest rate affers on the Tax Anticipation ficates far the March 3, 198'� meeting. �:madlr ;» �r T0: FROM CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 16, 1987 yor, City Council and City i ator James E. Danielson, Public Works Director SUB.J�CT: Kennelling for Mendota Heights Dog Catcher SION: � The Mendota Heights Zoning Ordinance presently does not allow for kenn ling of dogs within any district except the B-2 District, and that is only in conjunction with a Veterinary Clinic and only during the time period nece sary for medical care (see attached Ordinance). Dr. Koepke, owner of the Mendota Heights Animal Hospital was not aware of t e restriction and has done some kenneling. He has 16 stalls for kenn ling at his facility. His medical business has now increased to the poin where he no longer is able to provide kenneling except for the Midwest Anim 1 Services. Midwest is the West St. Paul dog catcher. Chief Delmont woul also like to use Midwest and was negotiating with them for use in 1987 In the course of the negotiations he discovered that they use Dr. Koep e for kenneling. Being as this is illegal under our ordinance Chief Delm nt would like to have the City modify its ordinance to allow Dr. Koepke to k nnel. mo Staff feels that there are several good reasons why the City should v its ordinance: 1. Many of the dogs captured need medical attention and Dr. Koepke would then be readily available to treat them. 2. Oak Crest Kennels (our existing service) is somewhat remote for our residents and Dr. Koepke is centrally located for easier accessability. 3. Oak Crest has no medical facilities and is quite often not open during the hours our residents need service. 4. Dr. Koepke also makes a diligent effort to find homes for unclaimed dogs in lieu of putting them to sleep. Staff would like to use Midwest and Dr. Koepke's facility for 1987. REQUIRED• If Council agrees they should direct staff to take the necessary action to m dify the City's ordinance to allow kenneling by Conditional Use Permit at a imal hospitals. To accelerate the approval process Dr. Koepke will at the ame time apply for the a modification to his Conditional Use Permit to allo kenneling. 13.2 13.21 Conditional Uses ' 9;-u, Within any "B-2", Neighborhood Business District, no struct- ure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit. �1) Tavern. 13.2 2) 13.2 3) 13.2 4) 13.2 (5) 13.2 (6) Theaters, but not of the drive-in type. Private lodges and clubs. Accessory structures other than private garages. Essential service structures. 4 Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic). As used hereunder the term "Animal Hospital" or "Veterinary Clinic" shall be deemed to mean a facility for the diagnosis, treatment and medical care of small anirimals, in which all professional services . are conducted within an enclosed building and which excludes the kenneling of such animals except for the time period nec- essary to provide medical care therefor. Any conditional use permit for an Animal Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No noise from the operation of the facility shall be discernible beyond the boundaries of the lot on which the use is conducted. To achieve noise con- trol, the facility shall be of masonry construction with outside walls at least 8" thick, and with a precast concrete roof. 2. Odor control shall consist of a ventilation system designed�so that no odors or organisms will spread between wards or to the outside air. An air condi- tioning system may be required, with windows double glazed with fixed sash. 3. An approved system shall be provided for the storage and disposal of dead animals off the premises. 4. Large dog facilities for indoor exercise of such animals shall be provided. `No outside pens shall be permitted. 5. When abutting a residential district, an approved screening and landscaping plan shall be filed and developed along the property boundary lines that abut the "R" District. 6. Hours at which the facility will be open to the public for the receiving and pick up of animals shall be approved by the City Council to insure compatibility with surrounding land uses. (401) 59 ,�- -w:...,�- . . .. -- --- � ------ _-T__ . ______-_..___ . __._..._._—_��_._.... ___„_:-�;;�, �� . ']_ pff-street parking faci].i�ies shall be provided, of at least the ratia required for professianal o�fices under Section 18.1{4)q of the Zaning 4rdinance o� ane space for each two hundred {20Q) square feet of floor area in the building. g, p,n Animal Hospital may include a live-in facility to permit a staf� member to be on the premises 24 hours per day. Such facility shall be limited to 620`square feet of floor space and shall na� be designed to serve as a"single-family residence�� as hereinbefare defined in this Ord�nance. 13.2i7) The sale and servicing of heating �qu�Qvided thatCthere1shalg equipment and'electrical appliances p not be more than �ix persons employed upan said premises in the repair ar servicing of said equipment or appliances. io Permitted Accessoxy Uses Within any "B-2" District the following uses shall be per- mitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in Section 11.3. 13.3(2) Any incidental repair, pracessinq or storage necess�r�y�tthan conduct a pex'mitted princi�Prosse�I.00rlarea ofCthe principal twenty {20} percent of the g building. 13.4 13. � (1) 13,4 {2) 13.4 t3) Lot Area, Height, Lot Width and Yard Rectuirements No structure ar building shall exceed three (3) stories ar thirty t��) �e�t whichever is less in height except as pra- vided in Section 20 of this Orciinance. The floor-area-ratio within the "B-2" Use Distxict shall not exceed 0.5. The f ollowing minimum reguirements shall be abserved subject �.o additional requirernents, exceptions and modifications as �et forth in Section 20`. Hei ht 1, 2 & 3 stories Lat Area Lot Width Fron� Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 15,000 lOQ feet 30 feet 15 fee� �� equal sctuare to height f�� of struc- ture, which- ever is , - greater. General Requirements a� speci�ied in Sectian 4.17 of this Ordinance. MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS T�: Mayor, City Council, City Adm' i�J_,�tor January 13, 1987 :OM: K1a�ytori Eckl�s ✓/�� Civil Enc�ineer ;CT: Feasibilzty Report for public improvaments to serve the 5pring Creek Acres Subda.vision. SMP 87, PRQJ 1. � DISCt�TSSIt�N The city has been asked to in�tall public improvements to serv 8 new lots in Spring Creek Acres, a new proposed deve.lopment. The ew develapment is located at the southwest carner of Marie Aven e and Dadd Raad. Sanitary sewer, watermain, s�orm sewer and stre t improvements are required to fully serve the 6 proposed lots. The follawing is a discussian of the casts to serv� the subd'vision with the public utilities. on z exte sani wil.l ' the o of st assoc devel COSTS he methad o� serving the development with utilities i� shown attached drawings. Sewer and water laterals will be ed from the exz�ting mains along Marie avenue. Instal2in.g ry sewer and watermain will be complicated because of the ce of the creek, which must be crossed. Five of the lots ain access via a cul-de-sac extended from Dadd Road, while her three will gain access by Marie Avenue. A minimal amount rm sewer is reguired to serve this praject. The casts ated with canstructing each of the utilities to serve this t�ment are Iisted below. I EM COST Sanit r�r Sewer $48,150 Wate ain $31,000 Storm 5ewer $4,440 Stree $24,620 $108,200 ASSES 11 costs associated with serving this subdivision will be asses ed to the 8 lots. However, the developer has requested that the a�essments nat be split equally among each lot, because the lats Iong Marie Avenue gain na benefit �rom the streat improvement and h ve already been assessed far street i.mprovement. Therefore the 5 lots along the proposed cul-de-sac should be assessed for the stree and storm sewer co�ts. When braken down inta companents the asses ment for each of the utilities wauld be as follaws: UTILITY Sanitar� Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Street TOTAL MEMO CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT (5 cul-de-sac lots) (3 Marie lots) $6,020 $6,020 $3,875 _ $3,875 $890 � $4,925 0 $15,710 $9,895 � The per lot assessment for the 5 lots on the cul-de-sac appears to be very high in comparison to past projects, but this figure is actually artifically high because of the way the developer wishes to split the assessments. There is more than one owner involved in the development, which is why the developer requested that the street and storm sewer costs be assessed strictly to those lots that benefit. If the costs were split evenly among all the lots then the per lot assessment would be about $13,525 per lot, so the total cost of $108,200 doesn't seem unreasonable in this light. RECOMMENDATION Based on the information contained in this report it appears that it is feasible and desirable to serve the Spring Creek Acres subdivision with utilities in the manner shown on the attached drawings and Staff recommends Council Direct Staff to prepare plans and Specifications for the project. Staff recommends that the costs of the project be spread disproportionately according to the benefit received, as requested by the developer. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with Staff's recommendation, then Council should pass Resolution 87- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEERS REPORT AND ORDERING STAFF TO COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECS TO SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRES WITH SEWER, WATER STORM SEWER, AND STREETS. : � T –_� - _.t soMERS£T PARt� � �j ,� y - y ` �- : � —` --- �; l � ' _'.. . ! ��RIE ' � • • . � .. . . . � _ ..._..� - - - `�VENUE , � ,�. , • • • � < _ `.. ,"'�"-�� `�� ` i ��""` ,b :` �` � .. ,.r�' � I ` �� . . � -� . , , .`,� 2 .'�� '� r . � ` .,�_ �.. �„ _ o �` r � ' '"� `"`� `\�' .,�t �, i '� y, ,.�t '� �,,.i -"i-. .. � `; r--� �,"��,,� 1 ..f ' 'rw• v f `�.� � � •^ ' �'�.� .�� `' ;. � _ M 1 n�� ` � - b ": :f � .� � . . . �` :�=.�` ✓° , - t �.. i . - � � , . ; � . � � , � � 6 - ; 5 � '�' , ' ( t � . � , � P. � a . � __ � I � � � , ... �t . _ _ 1 = yri � � � _ eu 'i ' '_ . . � PRING CF]EEK �IRCLE � � ;,s�+ 1 . . ; � . . ' e � � ' r-- --�— - � �,<. . . � , � � —..�_."' ZV' . • : . ♦ � �O_...- � • `r � � i L* ��St' h � 1 + hb . � �i i�� / ` � _ io 7 / '--._•-c: = . . � /� .. . 'as ^ . ' -• ..� /, ;--. _.._ . J � � wrLZo�r �� - .- �� '----_._..._ - , -----..`.---_.._ ''~---, • , r �� CITY C? MENDOTA HEIG�iTS �'easibility Repart �pring_Creek Acre� IMF. 87 `PROJ. 1'JOB 8703 . , .. imp CiCy of Mendata Heights Dakata County, Mi.nnesota RFSQLUTION N0. 87- RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE SPRING CREEK ACRES (IMPROVEMENT N0. 87, PROJECT N0. �; "' �AS, a petition has been filed with the City Council requesting the following yvements to serve Spring Creek Acres. The cons�ruction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, in-- cluding appnrtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of ease- ments, and the reconstructi�n where r�ecessary of;streets and ea�ements in the area herei.nafter mare particularly described. The construction af an extension to the City's water distributian sy�tem inciuding appurtenances and incidentaZs thereta, and the acquisition af easements, and the reconstruction where neces�ary of streets and easements in the area hereinaf ter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system inc].uding agpurtenances and inci- dental thereta and the acquistion of easements, in and for the area herein- after more particul.arly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of Che acquisition of easements and the grading, siabilization, dr ai.nage and bituminous surfacing, and Che construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the stree�s ta be situated in the area hereinafter mare garticularly described. WHER S, �he City Engineer repor�ted t�iat Che proposed improvement anc3 construc- tian thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported an the praposed cost of said impravements and construction thereof; and WHER AS, �.he area proposed to be assessed for aaid a.mprovements is situated with'n the Gity of Mendota Heights in Dakota Caunty, Mannesota and is more part'cularly described as fa].lows: Spring Creek Acres , NOW T REFORE, IT I� HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Heigh s, Minne�ota as follows: . That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of �ndota Heights construct the above described improvements, and it is hereby rdered that said impravement be made. . That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed ta cepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 3. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and deszgnated as Im- provement No. 87, Project Na. 2. Adop�ed by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 20th day of ,�� January, 19$7. ATTEST: Mary Ann DeLaRosa DepuCy Clerk � CITY CQUNCIL �ITY pF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. M�rtensotta, Mayar �