The URL can be used to link to this page

1986-09-161. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. C I - CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. ENGINEERING CONFERENCE ROOM ,1 City Administrator Annual Performance Evaluation. Adjourn to Regular Council Meeting at 7:30 IChambers. Call to Order. 7: Y� oll Call - � 6. I 7. AGENDA in City Council i � � � . • �9y4, Q�' � �"�l- ' � genda Adoption. �' � � �- �- �� onsent Calendar: � �' � i a. Acknowledgement of Treasurer's August Report. ' b. Acknowledgement of August 12 Park and Rec Minutes�. c. Approval of�the List of Claims. I d. Approval of the List of Licenses. � , nd of Consent Calendar. �, blic Comments. - yi.a- � � troductions._ I� ' D AWARDS AND HEARINGS: . ; - � I . Case No. 86-20 The Ponds of Mendota Heights, Preliminary Plat Approval 7:45 P.M. Resolution No. 86-72 and Ordin nce No. 2297,_ ^Hg ari c tinued f o August - 7°,,,�,1. ��w�i/ t-a�4`�o.:6d ��`- ..�3ti./3' C l�..c.� ��-k.x�,C��(�,�, . 7°-% c�,,,,,� . Case No. 86-16, Halley, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and "'�-�a: Subdivision. (8:15 P.M.) �Reso u ��o}� No 86-73 and� Ordi ance No . 2 0. -�- �� a��•/a✓�, �.,,,,,� �'g�.+.�/ -� .�t.�... 3-I; �.,,„,�.,...� �. �.Q �,,�,�„��,�„� � inished a^�r� Business: , I I. R. Bond Sale for Baptist Hospital Fund. (Resolution �� Available Tuesday evening. (Resolution No. 86-74)�..�/ � � ,� °��. �� I - � + i , � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA b. Discussion of O tsid egal Opinio on Mendakota Mall ` Application. - . , . oz c. Bu get A option/Levy �']fe o u i n. (Re olution No. 86-75). �/ �"� i ��-o/`^"/�er ° e�/R'DMy�J ¢ d. C o p p e r f e l d a s e f A s s e s s m n t R o l l ( Resolution No. 86- 76) • �� e. Deer Trail Hills Feasibility Report. (Drawings Available Tuesday - Resolution No. 86-77). �� f. Co e s on Mod 1 Noise Ordinance. — , �� . f- � r�u�,, .,,�,� J �<,�l�.,� �. _�,� _ a„ g. Reschedu %n � f Firs Meetin in Novembe — , .� /6 � �� . f�, G � S � o�o. �i, . 9. Res onse to Council Comments. � 0. Council Comments. 11. Adjourn. � ti, �tp c�r ,�,.�'�,�,' C(y Q�i -- �4 i . G�„�e..�- ,�.�- �— ,►-�1 /`� � u �sy�� J� . - l�.ui1 �+--.�: ��,�;� . 1 i�- � �. �°: U°,°.� . - ? �� .��--� _ , r7 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 16, 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council FRO : Kevin D. �� City ator SUB ECT: Add-on Agenda for September 16, 1986 age 8.e Two items are recommended for addition to this evening's a, and additional information is submitted for Items18.a. and Ite No. 3. Agenda Ado tion - � -� It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda with the add tion of Item 8.h. - Approval of 1987 Budget for Northern Dak ta County Cable Communications Commission and Item 8.i. Rev ew of City Hall Architect Qualifications. Ite 8.a. - I.R. Bond Sale for Ba tist Hos ital Fund - Please see attached memo from City Treasurer Larry Sha ghnessy. � Lon bud the the 8.e. - Deer Trail Hills Feasibility Report - Attached is the promised map to accompany the narrative rt. 8.h. - Approval of 1987 NDC4 Budget - Attached is a letter from NDC4 Cable Administrator Vicky , requesting our approval of their proposed 1987 budget. The et in the amount of $80,725, is up approximately 20.5�% from 'r 1986 budget of $67,000. Vicky informs me that almo�st all of increase is due to four items: i 1. $4,000 for a technical consultant to audit the completed system. � 2. Funds for an outside independent financial audit, as required by law. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 3. $1,000 for purchase of video equipment. 4. $1,000 for additional insurance for damage on public access equipment. As indicated in Vicky's letter, this budget is supported by reimbursement from Continental Cablevision, our franchisee. ACTION REQUIRED: Motion to approve the proposed 1987 NDC4 budget. Item 8.i. - Review of City Hall Architect - Pleasesee memo of September 12 and attached architect information which was sent to you with the agenda packet. KDF:madlr attachments �1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 15, 1986 TO: Mayor, City Council and City,��e�"`��rator FRO : Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer � SUB ECT: Baptist Hospital I.R. Bonds HIS ORY: We were to~act on the Resolution to issue I.R. Bonds�-for the Bap ist Hospital Fund tonight: Due to the short time to prepare fin Z documents, the bond attorneys were not able to get all the pap rs ready. � The attorneys have been in contact with DEED, and have a clo ing set off until October 8. The resolution can be adopted on Oct ber 7 and meet this schedule. + If for any reason the CounciZ should set a third meeting dur'ng September, it would be desireable to adopt the resolution at hat time; however, the October 7 date will allow timely del'very. ACT ON REQUIRED: None at this time. LESI : madlr 0 I ��c <T�,� <rl �a�ur�. L�:,ur�rr ��.a�! � C�,�;�.•��cv�c�r;cr�ts �. ;y�n,l�ssze�� 4; : • �:lunic:C�, �ar.rar � � 1� ,0 ";:tTtC.^.t,.'"".. �Vc�. '`.'t�st ;t =��i. `.tinneSCt� ;;, i''? � i?•'�:SG�$91 Septemb�r 12, 1�86 Mayor R bert G. l.acicwood 2.Hingh m Circle Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ma�or Lackwoad: . _,_ j ' "' .r �;;d�? ' Attache is a copy o�F the propased budget far NDC4 for 19$7. At the September 3, 1986 � Full Ca mission meeting the pr000sed budget was approved for submissian to the member ity Counciis for their consideration. Pursuant ta Section 9.Oi�of the ' Franchi e Ordinance, Lhis administratfve budget sha]1 be funded by the cable company thru pr payment of the franchise fea. # Pursuan to the Joint and Caoperative Agreement creating �SOC4, piease preseni the � at�ache proposed budget to your City Council for consideration. Upon approval, � please rovide tf�e Commissian with naiice of approval at the abave address. , Tne bud et wi1� became effective January 7, 14�7. The Commission will submit ine budget maunt to the cable company for payment when at least six af the�seven member ity Councils provide nptice of aoproval to the Commission. Should ou have any questians relative to this budget, please contact 45Q-9893. Sincerely, � // � �/ G � � � , I� Victori L. Long ' Cab3e A ministrator cc: Gi#y �Ierk v�.�. : �d� Attachm�nt at 6 _ NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICAi(QNS CC}MMlSSiON � c/o Municipal Center � We s Stu Pa �! M n esota 55118 612/450-9891 PROPOSED 1987 NOC4 BUDGEi BUDGET ITEM ADMINISTRATIQN ADMINISTRATOR - SALARY SECRETARY - 5ALARY BENEFITS MILEAGE OFFICE R�NT TELEPHONE SUPPL.IES/COPYING POSTAGE ACCOl1NTIN6 SERVICES TECiiNICAL SERYICES LEGAL COUNSEL INSURANCE EQUIPMENT LIABILITY ADVERTISING �URNITUREIEQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE BANK CHARGES PUBLICA7IQNS/MEMBERSHIPS CONFERENCE ��•� � : � � � 1,500,00 900.00 1,800.OQ 600.40 3,500.OQ 4,004.40 12,0OO.OQ 3,5QO.OQ 1,QOO.OQ 1,Q00.00 1,000.00 25.00 100.00 3Q0.00 5,0OO.OQ TOTAL PROPOSED BUDGET � $0,725.OQ C U.S OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS URER'S REPORT, AUGUST, 1986 TA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account Savings Account Savings Cert. 9-26-86 @ 7% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. OKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 9-4-86 @ 5.25% Savings Cert. 9-86 @ 7% BALANCE $ 255,899.08 416.01 25,000.00 $ 281,315.09 200,000.00 100,000.00 425,000.00 13,952.59 438,952.59 Collateral - Bonds 1,500,000.00 Gov't. Guar. 100,000.00 TREASURY BILLS Due 9-4-86 $205,000 Dk. Co.200,124.38 GOV'T. SECURITIES FUND Rep . Dakota Co. State Bank 6 9-86 > 700,000.00 2,400,000.00 COLLATERAL $300,OQ0.00 1,600,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $4,020,392.06 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, AUGUST 12, 1986 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Park and Rec eation Commission was held on Tuesday, August 12, 198;6, in the Cit Hall Council Chambers. Members present: Chairman Stein, Dof ing, Knittig, Schneeman and Damberg. Absent and excused: Sin er, Leffert. Also present were City Administrator Frazell and Pub ic Works Director Danielson. S Ay Na C OF '�•• ; � Aye : 5 Nay : 0 ROG RS LAKE SCH�OL BOARD ACTION ATH ETIC SITE 1 Minutes of the July 8 meeting were approved as submitted. I After a brief discussion concerning the Wachtler property's future function as an athletic facility, Commissioner poffing moved that the Commission abandon the property as a park site and allow the development a�nd subsequent subdivision of the propert�y as homesites. Commissioner Schneeman se'conded the motion, which carried unanimously. Mr. Jeff Schoenwetter, Halley Land Corporation, discussed the proposed subdivision and stated they are prepared to donate additional park land. (A parcel was dedicated years ago in an original pl�at). He described four alternatives. The Commissioners expressed their concern over access to Valley Park via trail connections. They expressed preference for sites 1) or 3 for park open space. After much discussion and neighborhood input as td usage, Commissioner Knittig moved that the Commission recommend options 1 or 3 with open space, to the City Council�, Commissioner Schneeman seconded the motion.� Motion carried unanimously.) The problem of swimmer's itch at Rogers Lake was discussed on the basis of an informative letter from the Fresh Water Institute. No action will be taken at this time. I The District 197 School Board is still in the process of receiving information concerning the joint venture proposal involving+the athletic fields. Chairman Stein recommended that a joint meeting of the School Board, City Council and Park Commission be held for Page 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMI�SION MINUTES, AUGUST 12, 1986 in�armation sharing and discussion. This recommendation was adopted by con�ent of the Cammission. City Admi.nistrator Frazell is the liaison between the Board�. FUTURE BOND ISSUE The Bond Issue was discussed as to time, citizen involvement and organization needed far successful passage. Chairman Stein asked the members ta be prepared for this discussi.on at the next meeting, September 9, 1986. ADJt�URN The meeting was adjourned. Re�pectfully submitted, Carol Damberg Acting Secretary � 0 i 9/16/86 CLAIMS LIST Dept 10-Admin 15-E r 53.46 53.46 � i 990.00 490.00 •� 100.00 100.00 �,� 483.25 �83.25 �� 19.10 19.10 +�� 154.19 154.19 y.� 33.21 33.70 66.91 •i 284.E0 �23.30 50T.50 � 590.00 590.00 t� 9.00 18.00 9.00 36.00 •i 7,372.00 7,372.00 +� 19.90 14.90 y� 20.00 565.00 605.00 •� 189.86 189.86 v 803.60 E03.fi0 �� 97.50 97.50 +i 10,468.75 10,468.T5 • / ng 20-Palice --a�ECI� REGISTER 39 F�se 40-CF.O VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION L�e.vT,.✓e.vTl%L sAF�ry P'q MEDICAL 8PLY8 DAKOTA COUNTY ATTNY FILE C5663-1f2 MR i MR8 R FLEMING 1ST TRU8T ST PAUL FME CORP KRECHS OFFICE MCH EUGENE LANGE EU6ENE LANGE OLSTEN 8VCS OLSTEN SVCS POUCHER PRTG b LITHO PERA PERA PERA RICHOH CORP RUFFRIDCE JOHNSON BANYON DATA SYSTEMS BANYON DATA SYSTEMS E L MKTC COVT BUS SYSTEMS� KREMER SPRC i ALICN SHAUGHNESSY CO RFD CAO FEE 9/8 MTG FEE RE B3 HD METER INK MISC SPLY8 MISC LUMBER LUMBER W/E B/E4 W/E 8/17 GO I BDS PRTG 8EPT PREM SEPT PREN SEPT PREM COPIER SEALS/FILTERB PR06RAM COVERUP RE COMP SET-UP DEMO CARDS BALLOT BXS � RPRS I BD FEE Rd&Br-50 Util- 60 Parks-70 via^ -an 09-16-86 PAGE 1 MCon-90 ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. Y MESSACE Oi-4305-020-EO 91�25 •F�-i24 01-2126-000-00 01-3365-000-00 7�-4E26-000-00 29022 Oi-4300-110-10 292581 01-4300-110-10 8556 01-4�90-020-20 01-4490-OEO-20 01-4130-110-f0 486041 01-�130-1f0-10 �86056 01-48E6-OQO-00 15688 01-�131-021-80 68�1 01-4131-110-f0 621� 05-�131-105-15 6244 12-4600-000-OQ 751004 01-�330-490-50 �2T75 01-�301-1/0-10 12-4600-000-00 Ot-4300-6�0-12 i965 01-�620-640-tE 2453� 01-�330-�90-SO 12051 85-4226-629-00 3 AMOUNT �0.95 40.95 •- 3.9E 49.01 52. 93 •,� 57.39 43.85 43.84 145.08 * 60.�0 60. �0 *.� 67.OB 56.94 124.02 � � 125.95 125.95 M� 180.00 �89.59 32.80 862.66 1,565.04 •�- 93.60 93.60 �� 381.35 381.35 391.30 1,14�.00 +� 54.00 45.00 9.60 108.60 +i 20.65 E0.65 20.67 61 . 9T •.� 160.00 460.00 +. 38.95 38.95 �, 355.59 355.59 � � CHECK RECI3TER VENDOR ITEM �ESCRIPTION 8PEED PRINT INC ART3IGN MATLS ARTSICN MATLS BRUNSON INST CO BRUNSON INST CO BRUNSON IN8T CO COMM TR3PT BATTERY 6 TIRE UHLS BATTERY 6 TIRE YHLS IN8TANT TEBTINC CO CREATIVE COLURS CREATIVE COLORB CREATIVE COLORS CREATIVE COLORS dOHN GRUND HALE CO INC HALE CD 1NC HALE CO INC HOME LUMBER HOME LUMBEIZ� HOME LUMBER KAPLAN BROS KAPLAN BROS KAPLAN 8R03 MIDIJEST YHOLESALE NORTHERN HYDRAULICS RUFFRICE JOHNSON COPIES HI LIER LETRASICN MISC 3PLY3 MISC SPLYS MI3C SPLYS RPR3 SSdMH RD BEAMS BEAM3 JUL SVC POUER uASHER MTSC PAINT MISC PAINT' MISC PAINT STUMP REMOVAL RPR3 RPRS RPRS SILICA SILICA BOARDS COVERALLS COVERALL3 COVERALLS TiRES/MDUNTINC TARP 303 RPRS 307 09-16-86 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. IF MESSA6E 01-4305-OEO-20 4+l862 01-4300-640-IP ��691 Oi-�300-6�0-12 �487G OS^4305-105-15 6�940 29-4305-838-00 64879 95-4305-822-00 6�879 01-4211-�21-50 �6373 01-4305-OEO-20 56227 O1-K305-O50-50 562E7 BE-�236-807-00 Oi-�200-610-70 8597 01-�330-�90-70 862� 01�4330-�90-TO 8658 Ot-4330-�90-70 8597 01-4500-070-70 01-�335-310-50 16611 01-�335-310-70 16611 15-4335-3f0-60 16611 01-�3�05-050-50 9727 01-�305-050-50 9685 Ot-4�90-640-12 599 01-4305-050-50 3575 01-�305-O70-TO 3575 15-�305-060-60 3575 15-4330-�90-60 96505 O1-�l305-O50-50 21164T 01-4330-�90-50 �2916 n VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. Y P.O. Y MESSACE i18.�5 SNAP ON TOOLB 8HOP TOOL8 Ot-�305-050-50 t030f 118.�5 SNAP ON TOOL8 SHOP TOOLS Oi-1305-OTO-70 10301 � 118.�0 SNAP ON TOOL8 SHOP TOOLS 15-�305-060-60 10301 355.30 +� 10.50 GREC6 GUND MI THRU 9/10 OS-4415-105-15 10.50 • _ Y T.22- SUPERIOR PRODUCTS CREDIT 01-4335-315-30 �029�3 �' 121.60 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MATS 01-�335-315-30 543038 11�.3B +� :#, 78.00 EMILIE BRUCKMUELLER PRIMARY 01-4260-6�0-1E � 72.00 •� 36.00 EDLIINA BURRON PRIMARY O1-�P60-6�0-1P 36.00 +� P� 199.50 L E SHAUCHNE88Y JR PRIMARY Oi-1�60-640-12 r' � 199.50 •� � 83.15 JUNE LIACNER PRIMARY 01-4260-6�0-1P ��' 63 . 15 y � � 94.50 NANCY KRUSE PRIMARY 01-4260-640-12 . ii�� 94.50 «� �. 91.50 RITA MACZKO PRIMARY Ot-1E60-6�0-12 •�' 9�.50 y� �- 72.00 BETTY MOEN PRIMARY Oi-iE60-6�0-12 T2.00 «� ' 63.00 HUBERT MEIER PRIMARY 01-�260-6�0-12 �t• 63.00 +� � Y 67.50 GINGER SIMEK PRIMARY 01-�260-640-12 y 67.50 ti 76.00 LAURITA YEINZETTEL PRIMARY O1-4E60-6�0-12 'i- 76.00 •- ir 78.T5 .TEAN FRAN80N PRIMARY 01-�E60-640-12 � T8.75 t� � � - - -- -76. 50 � - MARY HARTZ �'- - - ` -- PRIMARY � ---"-" T - 01-�860-6�0-12 - - - - - - ---- - -- - - -- - -- -- --- - s� 76.50 •� v 78.75 CYNTHIA KLECATSKY PRIMARY Oi-4260-640-12 r� 78.75 +i �;� 76.50 ANNAHEL RANDOLPH PRIMARY 01-4260-6�0-1� � 76.50 + / �: 80.75 MARCELLA 8UNDBERG PRIMARY Oi-4260-6�0-12 AM4UNT 80.75 • �. 79.55 T9.55 +� � T2.00 72.86 �� 72.40 T8.04 �, T5.40 T5.44 t� TP.00 T2.Q0 +� ; 73.15 73. 15 *�. 73.15 73. 15 +�. 73.15 T3.15 �� T3.15 73.15 �� 95.00 95.00 •� 69.75 b4.T5 �r TE.00 T2.00 •r T6.00 76.00 �� 69.75 69.75 •� 13.50 13.50 •i #2.75 �2.75 �� 2.T5 +F2.?5 �r 33.85 33.25 �✓ CHECK REGISTER VEND4R IT£N DE&CRIPTIOM t1ARJORIE CH6ESBROW T�RESA E88�INGER SUSAN CUITON PAT METTINGER JUDITH HILLSTEAD BONLTA ANDERSpN MARY DONERTY JANAK GAiNOR THERE8A REDDIHC ARYID RUED FI.ORENCE CRAHAM MARY ANN HOYT MARSHA KNUTH MARLENE ME8NER tAWftENGE GRANAM ROSEHARY MURPHY MARILYN NELSON MARY SHAUGHNE$SY PRIHARY PRINSRY PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY fiRIMARY PRIM�RY PRIMARY PRFMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY pRIMARY PRIMARY PRIHARY PR IMItRY PRIMARY PRIMARY Q9-16-86 PAGE +{ ACCOUNT ND. INV. N R.O. # ME3SACE dt-48BQ-G�8-t2 Ot-��60-844-lE Of-�E60-6�Q-t2 01-4260-640-12 01-1260-6�0-12 01-�860-640-12 81-4P60-6�0-12 a�-�aso-s#a-�a Oi-4E6Q-8#4-12 Of-�E8Q-640-12 01-�860-6�0-12 Oi-4E60-640-12 01-�260-640-12 01-4£b0-6+l0-12 Ot-4P60-8#4-12 4t-#860-G#4-1� O 1-+}260-6�0-1 E 01-�26Q-640-12 , AMOUNT � VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 85.79 AIR COMM INC RPRS � 85.79 +� : � i i 73.99 ALDY CRAPHIC SPLY MI3C SPLYS 58.96 ALDY CRAPHIC SPLY MISC SPLYS 132.95 + '� _ <. ( 87.96 ALBINSON DIAZO � 87.96 r� Y, �• � 27.8� AT i T INFO SYSTEMS SEPT SVC � ET.B4 •� ?,. ` , 43.10 Bbd AUTO SPLY MISC SPLYS �e., 144.99 B6.i AUTO SPLY PARTS NELI TRK 188. 09 M� �' , � � 258.60 CASE POWER6E�UIP 'CHAMBER 40P `�`� 252.60 • �' � : � . f ��• � 70.18 CITY MOTOR 8UPPLY MISC PARTS �� , 3�.1E CITY MOTOR SUPPLY PRIMER/TFIINNER 3.E6 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY 6ATE8 � k 3.E6 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY CATE8 ,r � 3.26 CITY MOTOR SUPPLY CATES 'a�'�f 1 14. 08 • � . 't F T#.15 CONTEL CREDIT CORP PYMT58 �'� � 118.65 CONTEL CREDIT CORP PYMTSB � 59.3� CONTEL CREDIT CORP PYMT59 " 252. 18 ♦� — — — -- - �+.� - - — --- � -- — -- - -- — - - -- --- — �� 354.45 DAHLGRENBHARDLODUBAN AUG RE MAC �'� 1,242.00 DAHLGRENSHARDLOWUBAN AUG RETAINER �� 1.596.45 + � i � � 193.31 ELVGREN PAINT SUPPLY MISC PAINT ACCOUNT N0. INV. Y P.O. Y ME83AGE •��-CKS 01-4330-450-20 5�453 ��r-CKS OS-�300-105-15 3163� OS-4300-105-15 31635 OS-4300-105-15 326531 �++-CK8 O1-�E10-OEO-20 29335 ++M-CKS 01-4305-070-70 051719 12-4620-000-00 052685 •++-CKS 15-4330-�90-60 50965 ��+-CK8 01-�305-020-20 189005 Ot-4305-OSO-50 189005 01-4335-310-50 189055 01-4335-310-70 189055 15-4335-310-60 189055 +M+-CKS 01-4E10-020-EO 26639 01-�210-110-10 26639 OS-�210-105-15 26639 •++-CKS Ot-fE20-135-BO 01-1221-135-60 01-4305-050-50 71337 +++-CK8 CHECK RE6I3TER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 193.31 +..- 424.�5 GOA CORPORATION 54.00- GOA CORPORATION 20.00- 60A CORPORATION 350.45 • �, 106.92 ICMA RC • 71.11 ICMA RC 178.03 • � 250.00 IDS LIFE INS CO 250.00 �� 4.20 KNUTH TOM 9.03 KNUTH TOM 18.40 KNUTH TOM 10.50 KNUTH TOM 6.30 KNUTH TOM , 23.31 KNUTH TOM 3.15 KNUTH TOM 75.39 +,� 9.35 LEEF HR03 INC 9.35 LEEF BR03 INC 9.30 LEEF BROS INC 28. 00 • � 410.00 MA ASSOCIATES-• 410.00 •� 411.15 MEDCENTERS HP 963.00 MEDCENTERS HP 473.�0 MEDCENTERS HP 165.00 MEDCENTER3 HP 764.70 MEDCENTERS HP 63.30 MEDCENTERS HP 729.85 MEDCENTERS HP 558.30 MEDCENTERS HP 139.85 MEDCENTER3 HP 4,268.55 + � TRAN8 FL OIL �RUM CR �RUM CR 8/29 PAYROLL B/29 PAYROLL 3EPT PREM MI THRU 4/9 MI THRU 9/9 MI THRU 4/9 MI THRU 9/9 MI THRU 9/9 MI THRU 9/9 MI THRU 9/4 AUC SVC AUG 3VC AUC SVC 09-16-86 PAGE 6 � ACCOUNT N0. INV. • P.O. � ME8SACE � �J.: ,� •*rt-CKS i '�; I�J 01-1210-000-00 5�400 �,: Ot-1210-000-00 9378 � "; 01-1810-000-00 9560 ; � I :: +��-CKS „J 01-2072-000-00 ! 'fl 01-�134-110-10 I„1` , s� Oi-2072-000-00 13678 �„}� ,�� •++-CKS ��J� OS-��15-105-15 �"� 28-��15-837-00 � z� 51-�115-925-00 � � 76-�115-833-00 82-�� 15-80T-00 �,J� BS-��15-B24-OO � 95-�415-822-00 ? , :1,: •r�-CKS 1 ''� 01-1335-3f0-50 816630 01-�335-310-TO 827656 15-�335-310-60 BE7656 ��r-CK8 HERBICIDE 01-4330-215-70 597 •+«-CKS SEPT PREM 01-207�-000-00 E1772� 3EPT PREM 01-4131-020-20 217715 SEPT PREM 01-�131-021-EO 217T15 SEPT PREM 01-1131-0�0-�0 L17T15 3EPT PREM 01-4131-050-50 217715 SEPT PREM Ot-4131-070-70 217715 SEPT PREM Ot-�131-110-10 217715 3EPT PREM OS-�131-105-15 217715 SEPT PREM 15-�131-060-60 217715 •++-CKS 0 T VENDOR ITEM DE8CRIPTION �� }5.35 MEND HCT8 RUHBIBH AUC 8VC 15.35 MENp HQTS RUH638H AUC MSVC ,flB.T5 MEND HGT8 RUHBISH AUC SVC 15.34 MEND HCTS RUBBISH AUC SVC -� 7A. 75 *..� tf ��1T2.7S M£'fRp NASTH CQNTROI AUC 8AC CNG8 3•�17P.75 M,� � �;, b�.40 MiD4lEST 8IREN SERV SEPT MTCN F b2. i0 �,�. 3.. .�56.21 MINN 9ENHFIT A83N SEPT PREM 80.64 MINN HENEFI7 ASSN SEPT PREM *ti3.40 NINN BENEFIT A88N SEPT PREM ,�839,50 MItiN HENEFIT AHSN 5EPT PREM '1�2.95 MINN HENEFIT A&SN 8EPT PREM ='101.00 MINN HENEFI7 ASSN SEPT PREH 1E.13 MINN BENEFIT ABSN SEPT PREM n 745.88 �►,,,. i� 15.35 NINN AEPT OF REV AUC FUEL TAX ;�., 15. 35 4 / � 85.Q0 MINN FIRE INC RECHAR6E ,. �5.04 *e �.':': � 4 1�f�.00 MINN TEANSTER-1OG32Q 8EP7 DUES �'!' 144. 00 • .r � 23.�5 NEt80N RApIQ CQMN 8EPT MTCN - --- - _,_ ---- __ 23.25 *„r �350.28 NORTHERN &T POUER CQ 6EP7 8VC ,� 14.50 NORTHERN 8T PQWER CO 8EPT 8VC 42.36 NORTNERN 87 PQUER CO SEPT SVG E66.60 htlRTNERN 8T PQUEft CO 8EPT SVC w� iS.tT NORTNERN ST PO4lER CO SEPT 8VC �� 594.01 «�' �,r� Q9-16-86 PAGE T ACC011NT N0. INU. M P.4. � ME88A4E 01-�E80-3f0-50 3T Q1-�£80-31a-70 37 Oi-42$0-315�34 23 1/E i5-�280-3f0-64 37 15-�448-060-60 OT-4330-008-80 1298b O}-8d7�-004-04 01-i13i-620-EO O 1 ^� 131-081-E8 Oi-�131-070-'f0 Ot^1131-110-10 OS-413f-145-15 15-it31-484-G4 01-13P0-050-50 87T6 Oi-4345-024-20 50286 01-8075-000-00 s�r-GK$ * * «-G#(8 •+«-CKS •s�-CKS *+s-CK8 f wMr-CKS 01-�338-i5Q-8Q ti091 - -- — �"'._--.---- - , +�y�CK$ Ot-#841-315-34 - — _--_ _._ __, .---_— — a _ Ot-+f211-32d-70 8t-4L'tE-320-78 15-4211-�00-68 15-421P-iQQ-60 +w�-CKS i #MQUNT 39.85 1?.28 t7.2e 19.50 17.24 373.60 48�.80 «.,,. CHECK RECI3TER VElIDQR IiEM Qf8GRIPTION NQRTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVG NORTHWE8TERN BEIL 8EPT SVC NORTHWESTERN BELL SEPT SVC NORTHWESTERN BELL 8EPT SVC NORTHWESTERN 6E�L &EPT 8VG t+tORTHWESTfRN HEtt SEPT $VC 8,013.21 ORFEI 6 SONS INC PYMT 2 86-8 88,848.68 ORFEI #�ONS INC PYMT 4 85-4 ?6,909.89 + 09-16-86 PA6E B ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. iF NE88AGE 0l-4210-024-24 at—�t2to—oso—so 01—�i810-070—TO OS-4E10-105-15 15-42l4—O60-6Q 15—+{Et0—Ob0-60 76—+lA60—B33-00 85-4460-829-40 12.60 0%YCEN 3ERVICE CO DEMURRAGE 7HRU 8/15 01-4305-050-50 239271 12.60 * 190.00 PINE BENQ PAVING INC FINE MIX bE.81 PFNE SEND PAVIHB INC FI1VE IiIX 23B.6b PINE HEND PAVIN6 INC FINE MIX 68.81 PINE BEND PAVING YNC FINE MIX 82.84 PINE $END PAYING INC FINE MIX 23,87S.E6 PINE B£ND PAVINC 2NC PYMT 79-3 24,490.33 •_ • 2,177.99 PUBLIC EMPL RET A35N 8/29 PAYROLL i,395.QT PUBLiC EMP� RET #88N Sf24 PAYROLl. 71b.3� PUBLIC £MPl RET A3SN 8129 PAYR0�1. 8.17— PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN DUPL ENTRY 8.17 PUBLIC EMPL RET A38N 8/29 PAYRO�l. B.iT PUHIZC EMPL R£T A8$N - 8l�9 PAYROL� 49.20 pUBLIC EMPL RET AS$N 8/24 pAYR04L 17+1.74 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN 8/Q9 PAYROLI. 103.E5 pUaLIQ EMPL RHT AS8N &!29 PAYROI.� 1i9.20 PUBLIC EMPL RET A88N Bl29 PAYRBL� 267.33 pUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN 8/29 PAYROLL 54.47 PUBLIC EMPL RET A88N 8/29 PAYROl.L S, 049.74 4 ,. 73.50 S6T 4FFICE PRBDUCT$ C!A$P ENV 73.50 r r 7.90 SEVEN CQRNER ACE HDW VALVES ?.40 + r Q1—�4P2-480-50 361 dt—#422-050—SD 36+t Ot-1�22-050-50 3T7 Ot-1iE2—OTO-70 a6� 15-4428-060-64 3fi# Si—�4fi0-425-00 Of-20B2-000-00 41-4134-024-80 Of—it3i-08I—EO 01—�134-030-30 4 f —! 13+l-034-30 41—�13�-030-34 01—� 134-010—� 0 01—�13�-050-50 4t-4f3i-470—?4 Oi—�13�-110—f8 05-4134-105-15 15—�t3�-060-60 0t-4300-110—td 6T�893 01-4305-030-30 301538 *�*—CK3 - �� n � � n `. �' '�� ttt—GK$ � r •��—CK8 �� „ �. . a. � �- .. tX F� t.. �H �� ♦s�—CK8 ' , .' � . � r��—CIS8 +.`� ' '� ry � �, � *�4—CKS ;�. 's i . ' •, � � �� 71 � i9 AMOUNT CHECK RECI8TER VENOOR LTEM DE8CRIPTION �B.?5 82GNAL CAR �ASH E8.75 �i B.69 SNYAER DRUC 8TORE3 EO.EB SNYDER DRUC STORES 4.48 SNYDER DRUC 8i0RES 33. B4 + � 3�0.94 S7 PAUL PPiDIBPATCH 340.94 +� Q2.40 8Ul) NEYSPAPER3 T.TO SUN NEYSPAPERS 7.T0 SUN NEWSpAPER3 13.30 SUN NE{JSPAPERS 11.20 SUH NE4ISPAFERB 18.25 $UN NEHSPAPERS 23.86 SUN NEIJSpAPERS f4.SQ SUN NE�1$PAPERS 8.40 SUF! NEitSPAPERS 12.85 8UN NENSpAPERB 32.9Q SUIV NEYSPAPERS �er,as .� AUR �ASHE8 MI3C 8pLY8 EX7 CORDS PTCTURE8 vz-Ec-aa rnrc 1 ACCOUNT N0. INV. Y P.O. N MESSAGE •wv-CKS Of-#43d-420-�4 E11? 01-�300-6�0-12 1021?7 O1^1300-610-18 f021T8 01-i+490-424-80 tOP174 HRC NOTICE Lt,OYDS O1-�E��-O80-Bp 219926 HRG NOi lL4YDS HRC NOT DE�E7E Ml4X HRG NOT DELETE MA% HRC NOT HALLEY NRC NOT D4H2E HRC NOT OOHIE HRG NOT 9UDCET HRC NOT AFFIDAVIT8 FIRG HOT TEST HRC NOT tAB PI.0 HRG ND7 84-4 01-4244-060-84 T484Q 81-i240-OBO-80 T0838 01-�240-080-80 70913 O1^1��0-080-90 70912 4#-4E40-484-84 T0414 o�-+e�a-oea-eo zoa�T Oi^�210-1f0-10 70915 Of-4E40-644-1L* 70985 01-42#0-b#0-12 70488 01-�240-640-18 7098? 98-421Q-BE2-00 T0834 62.00 UNITEQ CEHT TRtlSTEE SEPT FREM 01-2071-000-00 1i6476 3T.80 UNITED CENT TRU$TEE 8EPT PREM 01-113$-020-80 L14976 1.86 UNITED CENT TRUSTEE SEPT PREM 01-�138-050-50 L169T6 E4.84 Ut2ITED CEFIT TRUSTEE SEPF PRHti 41-4#3E-474-T4 Li597b 12.i0 UNI7ED CENT TRUSTEE SEPT PREM 15-1138-060-b0 L169T6 139.26 �i 127.f0 IIE8TERN LIFE IN8 CO 3EPT PREM O1-4f3£-030-3Q 328fi - i 27 : i 0 s i- --- -- -- -- -- - - - - - _.___ _ ._--- - - - _ __ _ _ . .� �3,684.93 FUNO 4i T4TA1. CENERAL FUNO 1�307.+45 FUNi3 Q6 TOTIt� ENGR ENTERFRi8E 62.A0 FUND 07 TOTAL CIVIL DEFEN8B 8,101.99 FUND 18 TOTA4. EpUIPMENT CERTIFICATES 7,392.89 FUNB 15 T4iAl. 8HUER UTILITY 9.Q3 FUND 2B TOTA� I86-6EVER6REEN KN04L 2ND 43.85 FUND 29 TOTAL I86-7 COPPERFIELD 8 r*t-CKS •+r�-CK8 ««r-cxs w**-CKS t*t-�K8 �*v-CK8 i AMOUNT 23,894.16 �83 . 25 8,023.T1 132.25 T9,388.T� 79.89 152,600.54 MANUAL CHEC[CS 11189 11190 11191 11192 11193 11194 11195 11196 11197 11198 11199 11200 11201 11202 CHECK RECISTER VENDOR FUND 51 TOTAL FUND T� TOTAL FUND 76 TOTAL FUN� 8� TOTAL FUND 85 TOTAL FUND 95 TOTAL TOTAL 09-16-66 PACE 10 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. • P.O. N MESSA6E IT9-3 MIRIAM-HIAN DRAINA CONS PRO,I FUND I96-2UNIT METH S/UTR/ST I82-TBISAN2 FEAS STUDY I85-�COPPERFIELD TANDEM I81-�COULD YORKTON 77.00 Clerk Court Aenn Cty Bail money 461.31 City M.H. P.C. Acct Replenish Petty Cash 25.00 Kumicat ICMA Conf 50.00 MDIA Conf G. iange 250.00 NSPE Engr. Forma 5,021.45 P?RA 6/5 Payroll 112..20 DOER SS Div B/29 Medicare 3,033.17 " 8/29 FICA 5,160.47 Dakota Bank 8/29 FIT 500.00 " S/29 Payroll Ded 2,656.31 SCCU " 26,919.91 City M.A. Payroll Acct 8/29 Net Payroll 225.00 D. Delmont Class Ring FBI Acad 136.85 Shangr-ila Elections 44,628.67 G.T. 197,229.21 �' 'Ti ii .� , ��' i� e $ n , i"� p� � :; ,i ;. i� ,s 1�6 : � :� �i � 0 GASI LIST OF 1986 CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 PIPING LICENSES Mit hell Company Ron s Mechanical, Inc. Hin ing Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. al Contractor's Licenses LeG an Homes, Inc. R& L Panek Construction Company Wil iam G. Huttner Construction Hea in and Air Conditioning Licenses Mit iing Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 's Mechanical, Inc. :hell Company SE TO: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO 12, 1986 Mayor and City Council . Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator CT: The Ponds of Mendota Heights - Continued Public� Council considered the application of Royal Oaks Rea the Ponds development around Warrior Pond at the meeting 5. Requested action before the Council that evening incl, 1. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. 3. Rezoning. Preliminary plat approval. Cou cil opened the necessary public hearing, but after di and a decision to ask for further research on a number of the public hearing was continued to 7:45 P.M. this evenin con enience, I have attached an additional copy of the me Cou cil on the evening of August 5, along with the Resolu aff cting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and the Ordin aff cting the rezoning. Council may wish to review the a inf rmation, including the City Planner's report, which w to ou for the August 5 meeting. DIS¢USSION: Hearing lty for of August uded: cussion items, . For o to the ion nce ditional s sent Attached is a memorandum from Jim Danielson, dated September 8, hich answers some of the questions Council had raised�. Most imp rtantly, it is a feasibility report on the alternative ways of acc mplishing necessary storm drainage improvements. Theimemo als specifies pond elevations, DNR involvement in the pro�ect, and the scenic easement. Mr. Michael Kurtz has promised to have a recommendation from the Dodge Nature Center about the scenic easement by Tuesday eve ing, and hopefully will have the soils test as requested. You wil also find attached a revised plan as submitted by the dev loper. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO ACTS�N REQUTRED: Cauncil shauid re-open the public hearing, consider the � iurther information submitted, and receive any public comment. After clasing the public hearing, Council would then be in a position to: - 1. Adopt the resolution affecting the comprehensive plan amendment. 2. Adopt the ardinance affec�ing the rezoning. 3. Give preliminary appraval to the revised plat. KDF:madlr attachments follo Hei desc Mend City of fi this ther aft Kath CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 401 � City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ordains as . I �tion 1. Ordinance No. 401 known and referred to as the "Mendota Zoning Ordinance" is hereby amended in the following respects� . The following described property situated in the City of Meridota eights in Dakota County, Minnesota, is hereby rezoned from an "R-lA" One amily Residential District, as the case may be to an "R-1" One Family istrict, to-wit: The South Half (S 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 25, T28N, R23W, Dakoti County, Minnesota. . Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Mendota Heights refer'red to and ibed in said Ordinance No. 401 as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of ta Heights" shall not be published to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said Zoning Map on file in the Clerk's e for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in Ordinance, and all of the notations, references and other information shown �n are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this �rdinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and its publication according to law. � ed and ordained into an Ordinance this 16th day of September, 1986. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By e en M. Swanson, City Clerk e CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 86- RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights has been requested to rezone the land known as the Warrior Pond site, otherwise known as the South 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, from R-1A to R- 1; and WHEREAS, that land is currently shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan as Rural Residential (RR) and the requested density, R-1, is Low Density Residential (LR); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their July meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from RR to LR� and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted the required public hearing on August 5, 1986; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from RR to LR. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights to request that the Metropolitan Council allow the City of Mendota Heights to change the designation of the Warrior Pond site from Rural Residential (RR) to Low Density Residential (LR). Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1.6. -, day of September, 1986. , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk , � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 8, Mayor, City Council and City /' i tr tor r-''�� . James E. Danielson, Public Works Director . Storm Water Feasibility The Pands of Mendota Heights Jab No. 8b22, Improvement No. 8b, Project Na. 9 � •:. Council conducted a public hearing at �.heir August 5, 1986 meeting to can- er "The Ponds of Mendota Heights" subdivision, At this hearing�there were e serious questions r aised concerning the feasibility of providing an outlet tro1. for Warriar Pond and concerning whe�her the soil could adequately supgort es. One resident said the site was all peat. The Council direated staff to dy �.he s�Corm water questian.and the I}eveloper to obtain sail tests., The . ring was continued to September 16th to a11ow time to have these studies pa red . � �� e Staff has studied the storm water question and has developed options; 1 following This option connects Warrior Pond to the existing starm �ine in Warrior ive by means of an inle� at Knob Road that extends sautherly dowiz Knob Road in e ea�t di�ch line approxima�ely 650 £eet and then easterly between 2 homes to rrior Drive (see attached plan sheet}. This line has to be extended �his far uth in order �o get to a point low enough in the s�.orm �ewer in Warrior Drive that a positzve flaw line can be obtained. The ma�n prablems with this optian are: l. The Expense: 1425 LF of 12" Storm Pipe @$32/per LF 6 Manhaies - Deeper Chan normal $1504feach Connec�.ion @ Warrior Drive Easements Landscaping (Yard Repair) 40% Contingency and Administration lOS,OQO = $4,770 per lot 22 lats $45,60 9,00 1,40 14,Ofl 5,00 $75, 30, $81,92Q be P di wi 0 a 2. The Inconvenience: ' The two homeowners where the starm lead wauld pass between their homes would greatly inconvenienced by having their yards dug up. Mr. Bjorkland and Mr. �son who own the undeveloped land to the east would need to do same land- ►nning to determine the bes� route far the line to cross thezr Iand. 'ION 2 This option connects Warriar Pand wzth the Trunk Highway 110 F;rantage Road :ch by ex�.ending a new storm line down South Lane. It is similar�to Optian 1 ;ept that it does nat enter directly into an existing starm system. It also _1 inconvenience some residents and will require acquisition of some private �ements and MnjD4T approvals and germits. Costs far Option 2 are� as follows: 1350 LF of 12" Storm Pipe @$22/per LF 4 Manho3es C� $1200 Easements Landscaping {Yard Repair} 40� Administration & Con�ingencies 62,020 = $2819/per lot 22 lots 3 17,7 This option connects Warrior Fond to the Wesley Lane storm sewer which then �Ciets into the existing T.H. 1�+9 ditch line. �'rom there the wa�er travels uth through a series of natural holding pands before going west under T.H. 149 d through the Bunker Kills neighborhood. .Because Che Bunker Hills neighborhood s no established storm sewer system staff feels that if this option is selected ie T.H. 149fFreeway Raad nar�.heas� quadrant shpuld be regraded to�redirect the �alnage south away irom Bunker Hi1.ls, under Freeway Road and then�under Trunk ighway 110 to the creek in front of the shopping center. This construction, ?cause it is in a Mn/IX}Z' easement, would, of course, require appraval and a �rmit from them. The estimated costs for this aptian are as follows: 1000 LF 12" Storm Water Pipe @$ZO/LF $20,OQ0 Regrading by Freeway Road & Erosion Control 10,000 in Di�ch Along Dodd Road � $30 , OO,Q 40� Contingencies & Administrat�an $42,000 = $I910 per lot 22 lots 12, � This optian cannects the Warrior Pand with the storm sewer in Marie Avenue. ke Option 1 it too would greatly incanvenience some residents and; is very pensive. The costs for the option follow: � 1300 LF 12" Storm Water Pipe @$30 LF 7 Manholes @ $1500 Easements Landscaping {Yard Repair} 40% Administration & Contingencies ,400 = $4,520 per lot 2 Lots $39,00 10,50 14,00 7,50 $71,00 28,�0 $99,40 I� appears to s�aff that the most feasible and least disrupt� adjoining residents is Og�ian 3. �. .i� E l. Current Pond Data: Elevation , 927 MSL Depth . 5- 6 Feet Deep Overflow Elevation : 927.8 MSL 2. DNR Involvement: This pand is a designated publ.ic waters by the Department of s urses and the Gity will have to work with that agency to de�erm h gh water level to establish the controled pond elevatian. 3. Scenic Easement: option to atural Re- e an ordinary Staff has met with the Developer �o discuss the possibiiity of implementing a scenic easement around the pond simi].ar to the one used for Copp�erf ield. We f rnished him copies of �he Tandem easement and he indicated that he would p obably be amendable to completing a similar document far his development. He i presently working with Jim Malkowski of the Dadge Nature Center� for his West S. Paul development and would consult with him far the limits af �this easement. 4. Soil Tests: Mr. Kurtz stated that he has ardered a soil report form Twin ut that it was not yet available, however they have promised him ave a report ready by the day of the Gouncil meeting. Gity Testing that they will S, Plan Revision: Mr. Kurtz haa redrafted his plat drawing eliminating ane lot along tdarrior Dr ve (a�tached}, He says that naw he and his partners are not sure abaut the fe sibility of having any lots along Warrior Drive. If �he hames are constructed cl se to Warrior Drive, sanitary sewer could be extended up the baulevard alang Wa riar Drive to serve them but the lots would na� be very desirable. If the ho es are canstructed back along �he pond the lots are much more desirable but th n the sanitary sewer in Warrior Drive is not deep enough ta �erve them. Sewer « wo ld have to be extended from the west side of the pond (see the attached map) at a greater expense and right through the middle of the trees along the pond. R f a The Developers need to make a deciszan on where �hey wil� site�their homes t of Warrior Pond as part of the fu11 feasibility regort preparation. DMMENDATIQN• Staff feels that utilizing Option 3 for praviding a Ieve1 control to Warriar d is a feasible alterna�.ive and subject to the Developer's sail report being arable recommends that the Council could proceed with approving � his preli— ary p3.a�. • f ' ! Conduct the continued hearing on this subdivision and if Coun ement the Planning Cammission's recommendation they should pas oving the preliminary plat. 1 wishes to a motion � i TO: Fron Subj CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 Mayor, City Council, City Ad 'n��tor James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Ivy Park Subdivision (Wachtler Site) Case: 86 - 16 (Michael Halley) DISCIUSSION Hea Sub att rev nei the his whe pre wil. Com: ' (no: wit: Com a c ord Mor thi act was How Dah are cos ame des ope r The Planning Commission has been conducting a Public ing on the Halley Comprehension Plan Amendment and ivision Request over their last three meetings. (See ched memos). At their August meeting they approved a sed plan that eliminates an originally proposed hborhood park from the plan. Mr. Halley had been before Park & Recreation Commission on two occasions to discuss plan with them and obtain a recommendation from them on her or not; ,� 1. The entire Wachtler site should be preserved for a City Community Park or; 2. If the City does not want the site for a community park, would they participate with the Developer in a� neighborhood park development if he dedicated the la�d. The Parks Commission has recommended that the City not erve the property for a community park. Council want to review the attached memos to the Planning .ission (dated August 17) and the Parks Commission -dated) concerning this issue. Should Council not co�cu the recommendations of the Parks and Planning �ission, but desire to reserve the Wachtler option for �mmunity park site, it could pass the "interim nance" attached to the letter of Attorney Dave .n, dated July 3rd. That would have to be done at , meeting, since a subdivision applications must be :d on within 120 days of filing, and the application filed June 2, 1986. The Wachtler site has already made its park dedicat: ver Mr. Halley, together with the City's Planner How< gren, felt that a neighborhood park was needed for tl . Mr. Halley proposed to dedicate additional land a1 to the City if the City would develop it with certa: ities. The Park Commission voted unanimously that tl red to have the land but wanted it left undeveloped < space. �on. �rd ie no �.n �iey is Mr. Halley has no interest in having more undeveloped apen space, therefore he has retracted his affer and replatted the area into lots. He proposes to construct his own private play area on one of his platted lots. The Planning Commission has approved that con�iguration. PIPELINES Because o� the Maunds View ineident there has been an increased awarenes� of pipelines. There are two pipelines on this site, one ownsd by NSP and one owned by Mobil oil. Mr. Ken Paetzel fram NSP has met with me to discuss their pipe line. This same line goes all the way through Mendo�a Heights by follawing the high vaitage pawer lines. Mr. Paetzel said that there �s some pending legislatian that will affect new high pressure Iiquid pipeli�es reguiring them ta be a minimum o� 150 feet from homes. He said that this pipeline is an existing law pressure pipeline and it probably will not be af�ected�by th'is new law. He said that this � pipeline was installed in 1963 and that it is periodically tested hydrostatically. 1� NSP daes not �eel that there is a reason for public safety concern, however because o� the recent events they want to make sure that it is c3ear that there is a pipeline in existence through the site. They would Iike to make sure future home buyers are made aware of its existence. I also contacted Mr. Don Shields from the Mobil Oil Co. about their pipeline through the site. He says that the Mobil pipe Zine is a 6 inch low pressure line used to transport gas and fuel oil from the Koch Refinery to their tank farm located on West �th Street in St. Paul. He said they have 44 faot easement and that homes can be constructed right up to that easement line, He said that they do keep their easement cleared so residents should be warned against planting or construating an it. REC�MMENDATIQN The Planning Commission on a 5- 1 vote recommended approval of the Comprehens2ve Plan Amendment. (Gommissioner Duggan thought that the City was making too many Comprehensive Plan amendments). The Planning C�mmission on a 5- 1 vote recommended approval o� the subdivisian without the neighborhood park dedicatian and subject to: ti 1. That the north cul-de-sac from eliminated to allow a juncture Drive by a "T" intersection. 2. That public access to south end of the plat, than 40 feet in width. ACT ON REQUIRED Farmdale be with Lower Colonial � Val.ley Park be pravided in the with acce�s to be no les�� 1). The Council needs to conduct a public hearing con ic?ering a Comprehensive Plan amendment and if the Council des're to implement the Planning Commissian recommendatio�n the should pass a motion adopting Resalution 86 _, � "'RE OLUTION AMENDING CTTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN." � the The Co�zncil then needs to consider the Ivy Park � ivision and if they de�ire to implement the Planning issian recommendation they should pass a motion approving preZiminary plat subject�to the fallowing changes: �' 1. That the narth cul-de-sac fram eJ.a.minated�to allaw a juncture Drive by a "T" intersection. Farmdale be with Lower Colanial 2. That public access to Va11ey Park be provid�d i� sotzth end af �Ghe plat, with access to be no 1es; than 40 feet zn width. the CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS RESOLUTIDN NO. 86- RESOLUTION AMENDSNG CITY'S C�MPREHENSIVE PI�AN W�iEREAS, The City of Mendota Heights has been requested to subdivide the Wachtler Community Park Site inta low density single family home sites and WHEREAS, the Gity Planning Commission conducted a public hearing where no adverse input was received and the Commission recammended to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designatian from P to Z,R and WFiEREAS, it is the opinian o� the City Council to change the Comprehensive P1an desigriation from P to %R. � ��' N�W, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City o� Mendota'�ieight� that the designation of the 29 acres of the Wachtler Site is changed irom Park (P} ta Low Density Residential (LR), conting�nt upon approval of Metropolitan C011riCI�. � Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights thi� 16th day of September, 1986. CITY COUNCIL CSTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO AUG ST 19, 1986 TO: Planning Commission FRO : Jim Danielson and P.W. Director Paul Berg Code Enforcement Officer CT: Case No. 86-16, Halley, Comprehensive Plan Amen�ment and Subdivision DISQUSSION: At the June meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a pub ic hearing to consider an application for approval of the Ivy Par subdivision. This hearing was continued to the July�meeting to llow time for the developers to present their proposal to the Par and Recreation Commission. The Ivy Park subdivision is loc ted on one of the City's candidate�sitesfor an activ�e park (Wa htler site) . � At the July meeting, the Park and Recreation Commission still had not made a recommendation, therefore, the hearing was� again con inued, this time to the August meeting. The Park and Recreation Commission, at their August mee ing after being presented the options for delaying action on thi proposal to allow more time for the City's final dec'ision on an ctive park location, decided not to delay action (see attached rep rts). They did this because they had been receiving�extreme pre sure from a large number of residents telling them no,t to have the Wachtler site as an active park. � lo to Wa sit Two a p rea The Park and Rec Commission felt that the active park tion selected will need the support of the neighborho'od it is e built in in order to have a successful bond referendum. The tler site definitely does not have that support. � After the Park Commission voted not to delay action on this , the developer presented four alternate site plans to them. plans were shown with a park dedication and two plans without rk dedication. The previous owner has already made the ired park dedication. However, the developer is willing to an additional dedication if the City will construct+some ities on it (tennis court, basketball court, play structure). � CiTY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO The Park Commission selected one of the faur plans that had a park dedication shown but then declined to offer to build any of the requested amenities. The Developar, without a commitment from the � City to build any amenities, and because �ime is af the essence, is not willing to grant mare park dedication. The Devel�per will show the four alternate site plans to the Planning Commission at the August meeting. ACTT�N REQUIREDt The Commission needs to conduct the continued hearing on this application and consider a Comprehensive Plan am�ndment far changing this site from Park to R-1, and a subdivision appraval. Based on in�ormatian from the hearing, they need to make a recommendation to the City Council. NOTE: BRING YOUR MATERiALS ON THTS MATTER FR4M THE JUNE AND JULY MEETTNGS TO THIS MEETING. JED/PRB:madlr attachment � CITY 4F MENDQTA HETGHTS Park� and Recreation Commission Kevin Fra 1� ��ty Administrator --- -- J Re: Develo ment of Community Athle�ic Fie1d (July 8 items 6 arrd 7 } Intiroduction Bas ear dav �9� The upd rec how d on the Barton-Ashman studyr the Commissa.on voted ier this year �.o cancentrate its efforts on joint lapment of the Henry Sibley site with Schaal Distric and to designate the "Wachtler" site as a second ch purposs of thi� memo i� to provide the Commission wi ted informatio�„�;,on these parcels, and ta salicit yau mmendations on decisions that will be before the Cit to proceed. se bring this memo with yau to Tuesday's meeting. Sibll.ev site As Sc pa co Di Su st so ne Th th wo en th Ba ha re � ice. on reported in last week's Friday New�, I appeared before the ool Baard on June 24th regarding our proposal that they half the cost, or $1620, of having Barton-Ashman ass�st two parties in coming up with a joint agreement for elopment and maintenance. The Board was receptive, but 3ined to participate monetarily until their staff had� pleted an analysis of aSl athletic facility needs in the �.rict. Since that meeting, I lzave tal}�ed with erintendent Bruce Ander�an. Mr. Az�derson believes their �f can compl.ete that analysis within two to three weeks, that the Schaol Baard can recansider their decision in the r future, s, of caurse, sl.ows down our plans. Hawever, because af potential cost savings of the Sibley �ite, it is probably th our wait. The District Athletic Director remains very husiastic, and I am confident will make a good ca�e for : pra�ect. t3ur ather aption would be ta proceed with the �ton-Ashman effort soley at City expense. However, in �es that the District will move quichy, I would not :ommend that. r, Wac�tler site As a c pre was the par mee Sib Co be de to we any of you are likely aware, Halley Hames, Inc. has ntigency purchase offer on this property, and ha� ented the City with a single-family home p�at. The before the Planning Commission at its June meeting, Cammissian declined to act pending a resolution of t .s issue. Continued discussion was tabled to the Jul ing. Unfortunatelyj it appears very unlikely that t ey site issues will ��-=� be resolved by that date, so . to decide how serious we are about preserving the .tler property as aur "backup" alternative. Wachtler proparty is designat�d on the City's prehensa.ve Land Use Plan as Park. The Plan will have amended in ordar to accomodate the single-family division request. Minnesota s�.atues provide the ortunity for city gavernments to pass an "interim inance" while studying passible changes i.n land use ignations. Such an ordinance precludes development f< one year, with an option far an additional 18 month ension. Attached is a memo from the City Attorney cribing this proces�, and offering such an ordinance. want to keep our options open on the Wachtler propert� 1d pass the ordinance. Your recommendation to the Cii ncil is requested. � tde t � :e to � If , we Y De eloper Mike xalley will be present at the Commission � me ting, since he proposes a neighborhood park development as a art af his plat (agenda item #�6}. I ight also add that many of the Cherry Hills neighbors were pr sent for the Pl.anning Commission consideration of the pl t. Most were adamantly opposed to a cammunity athlet5.c fi I.d on the property, preferring the subdivision. i expect th t same af them will. be present at your meeting. � Co Th Ci is�ion Action Required Commis�ion shou.ld con�ider and make recommendatian to the Council on the following: � l. 2, Are we willing to wait upon the School District� concerning Henry Sibley? � Should we pass an interim ordinance ta pratect�the Wachtl.er property as an alternative, or should�we Com com dis release it far development with the knawledge t a third site would have to be considered if the Sibley aption daes no�. wark out? sioners may want to review in Barton-Ashman study ity athletic �ield sites in preparatian for this sion. it 1ERMAN WINTH OP JBERT Ft. WEINS INE e2iCHARO A. NOEL ROGER D. GORDO 57EVEN G TpURE STEPMEN J. 3NYD R HART KU�LER DAVID P. PEAFISON THOMAS M. HAR7 1 DARRON C. KNU7S N JC1HN A. KNAPP SANORA J. MARTI MICHELE O. VAILL NCOURT JON J. HOGAN50 PEGGY A. NEI.SON DAV{p E. MORAN, IZ. DONALD J. BROW JAY R, tJAFTZGER TQDD B. URNE58 SCOT7 J. OONGl75KE WIIL{AM D. HITT� R GARYREN2 PETER J. GLE£!CQ ROBERT 5. SOSKI JEFFREY W. COd EDWARD J. DREN TEL JEFFREY R. ANSE JEFFREY N. SAU DERS W I N T H R O P & W E 1 N S T I N E ATTORNEYB AND CCIUNSELL,OR5 AT LAW Mr. K vin D. Frazell City dministratar - City f Mendota Heights 750 5 uth Plaza Drive Mend ta Heights, MN SSI�D RE: achtler Park Site Dear i80Q COIVWED TOWER 444 CEDAR 5TFlEET SAINT PAUL, MINNES(JTA SSIC11 7uly 3, I986 � H�IND D E 1Q12) 292-H110 OPY {g�2} 292-93<7 ED Enclo ed is the interim ordinance which I have prepared in accordance with our prior telep one conversations. Please review the ardinance and contact me or Tom Hart with ny questions ar cornments you may have. � Kath Swanson has informed me thaf ardinances can be placed an the agenda and adopt d by the City Cauncii at ane City Council meeting, and that the newspaper in whic the ordinances are published is a weekly publication, As a result, it would appe r that we can complete the adaption of the ordinance within approximately one mont , Since Jim Danielson indicated that the preliminary plat request was filed an or ab ut June 2, 1986, I do not believe any emergency ordinance is necessary in order to "c ver any gap" between the i20-day period within which preliminary plat approval must be granted and the effective date of the interim ordinance. � As m ntianeci abave, should you have any questions or comments, please fee! free ta ca11 ither me or Tom Hart. � Very �truly yours, WIN ROP & WEINSTINE � ' �� { �� Davi E. oran DEM�rmb Encl sure ORDINANCE NO. AN I TERIt'U3 �RDINANCE PRt�HIBITiNG THE SUBDIVISION OF A CERTAIN P4RT 4N UF THE CITY QF MENDOTA HEiGHTS PENDING COMPLETIC?N OF CERT IN STUDIES. � The ity Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does ordain as follows: l. INDINGS OF FACT. The ity Cauncil hereby finds. a) That the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Cade of the City s to provide for the arderly, economic and safe developrnent of land, services nd facilities within the City, and to promote the public heaith, safety and eneral weIfare of the community, � b} T'hat the propased subdivisian of the praperty legally described on xhibit !� attached t�ereto (the '- "Property") for residentia! purposes is in ccordance with the zoning o# the Property, but the Gomprehensive Plan ndicates that the Pr�operty is to be utilized for park purposes so �that an mendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required, and the effect of the roposed subdivision of the Property on the public welfare has not been pecificaily studied or analyzed in light vf the purpose of either the Zaning Code r the Camprefiensive PIan, aithough it is advisable to consider such matters in rder to promote the public health, safety and general welfare � a# the ommunity. 2. It is . we4f� peri repo That the City is presently studying the potential acquisition� of the >erty and development thereof as a city park, a use which is� clearly nsistent with subdivisian af the Praperty. ((d} That in order to efiect the purpose af the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code af the City and ta determine whether to develop the Property as a park or ta allaw subdivisian of the Property, the City Caunci! has directed the Planning Cpmmissian to conduct such studies and ta obtain such data; and to make such reports or recommendations, as will assist the City Council in preparing and considering appropriate amendments to the Camprehensive Plan andJor Zoning Code of the City with respect to the proposed subdivision of the Property or the development of the Property as a par#c. � {e) That such studies, data cailectian, recommer�datiorts and reparts w usefui and effective unless reasonable measures are taken far a r� interim period to protect the public interest and welfare and to prai orderly development of the Property by preventing subdivision of the LEGISLATIVE INTENT. � intention of the City Council #o protect the public health, safety ar af the community by adopting a reasanable interim ardinance #or a r during the pendency of such studies, data collection, recommenda as the Planning Commission has been directed ta make which will not be �ote the roperty. � general Sasonable `'ions and preserve �X15t2[i uses within the City, but which witl prevent the pcoposed subdivision o# the Proper y until the full impact of such subdivision or developrnent as a park� on the public health, safety and general welfare has been fully studied and considered. The interi ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority conferred an the City ,Council by Mi n. Stat. � 462.355, Subd. 4. , 3. I�ITERIM CONT'ROL. This 'nterim ordinance shall replace and supersede all provisions in aII other ardina ces and regulations of the City which are in canflict ar inconsistent with its terms with respect ta the Property. While this ordinance is in effect, the Rlanning Commission and the City Council may not grant any appraval ar permit with �respect io th subdivision af the Praperty. 4. �'ENALTIES. Any p rson, firm, entity or corporatiort in violation af this interim ordinance shall be subjec to the penalties and enforcement provisions contained in Section 13 of Ordin nce No. 301 of the City Code. � 5. 'VALIDITY. The i validi�ty of any worcl', "�ection, clause, paragraph, sentence, part ar provision of this o dinan�e shall r►ot affect the validity of any ather part of this ordinance, which shall e given effect without such invalid part or parts. � 6. �FFECTNE DATE. This rdinance shall take effect after its passing, approval and publicatian, and shail be ef ective for one year from its effective date, which may be extended after notice, heari g and appraval by the City Cauncil, as provided far in Minn. Stat. §�462.355, Subd. 4, far an additional period not to exceed eighteen (I8) months. Ado day by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, ibiinnesota, . 1986. CITY COUNCIL CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGHTS � ATT�ST: thl�een i�1. Swanson, City rt G. EXHIBIT A (Property Description} That art of Government Lot Eight (8) described as follows: Commencing at` a point 40 ro s West af the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of�Section Twen y-three (23), Township "fwenty-Eight (28), Range Twenty-three (23), thence Narth at right angies 20 rods, thence west at right angies 40 rads, thence Sauth at right angles 20 rods to the South iine of said Northeast Quarter {NE I/4}' of said (NE Gov the t28 }, Tht Ran of N then SE 1 the feet sout a li to t west 50" line poin That of S Cam the of S of s o# t or 1 said 35.b begi i n Twenty-three {23), thence East alang said sauth line o# said Northeast � Quarter 1/4) of said Section Twenty-three (23) 40 rods to the place of beginning, AND e nment Lot Eight (8) except the North 28d.6 feet of the West 375 feet and except s uth 20 rods thereaf all in Sectian Twenty-three (23}, Township Twenty-eight ange Twenty-three (23}, EXCEPT art of Government Lot No. 8(SE 1/4 of NE lj4) of Section 23, Township 28, g 23 described as fallows: Commencing at the sautheast carner of said SE 1/4 1 I4 thence northerly alang the Easterly Iine of said SE 1/4 of NE 1 J4 330,0 feet, westerly on a Iine 330 feet north of and paraliel with the south line af said 4 af NE 1/G� on an assurned bearing of South 89° 54' 24" West, 1Q85.OQ feet ta ctual point of beginning of tract ta be described; � e NQrth 36� 02' 27" West, 324.30 feet, thence North 22° 32' 04" East 140.10 ; thence North lOp 02' 45" West 327.16 feet, more or less, to a point 28Q.6 feet h of the north line of said SE 1/4 of 1VE I/4; thence North 89� 44' 13"� West on n 280.6 feet sauth of and parallel with said north line 37.40 feet, more or less, h west Iine of said SE 1/4 of NE 1/4; thence Sauth 00� 15' 16" West along said line, b08.26 feet, more ar less, ta the southwesterly line of a 30 foat permanent � easement {Book 3{34, page i 99 deeds as shown at Nc�. 42� thence Sauth 20° 4Q ` ast along said southwesterly line, 113.3Q feet, more or less, to a poin� on said 3Q feet north of the south lir�e of said SE 1/4 of NE 1/4; thence easterly to the of beginning. Containing 1.93 acres more or less. � part of the south 330 feet (20 rods) of Government Lot No. 8(SE 1 J4 of iVE 1 J4} ction 23, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota described as follows: encing at the southeast corner o# said SE 1/4 of NE 1/4; thence Nartherly alang asterly lirte of said SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 330.0 feet; thence on an assumed bearing uth 89° 54' 24" West on a line 330 feet north of and parallel with the south line id SE 1/4 of NE 1/4, a distance of 1,085.00 feet to the actual point of beginning act to be described; thence cantinuing 5outh 89° 54' 24" West 194.27 feet, mare ss, to the sauthwesterly Iine of a 30 foot permanent sewer easement (Book 30�, I99 deeds, as shown at No. G�2} thence South 20� 40' 30" East i82.4�0 feet alang southwesterly line af sewer easement, thence Savth 75° 42' S6" East, alang said westeriy line of sewer easement, 32b.19 feet, the�ce North 46° 54' + 07" East feet, #hence North 43° 43' S7" West 310.85 feet more or less, to the point of �zning. Containing 1.25 acres, more or les�. � acvo The est Half (W 1/2) of the North $ rods of the West Half (W 1/2) of the Acres except the West 30 feet thereof af Lat l, Auditor's Subdivision Na. 2, a�cor ing to the Plat thereof now on file and of record in the office of the of De ds of said Courity and State, Com encing at a point 40 Rods due West of a point on the Section Iine b Sectio s 23 and 24 in Township 28, Range 23, 2Q Rads North of the southwest of th Northwest Quarter of said Section 24, thence South at right angles 20 f South line of Lat 8, in said Section 23 thence East on the South line of said afore aid $ Rods to a point on the said South line of said Lot 8, thence North � angle 20 Rods to a point, thence West at right angles 8 Rods to the pI begin ing, containing One (1) Acre af land more or less according to the Gov� surve thereof. th 5 gister etween corner Rods to Lot 8 at right ace of rnment CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOT CE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AUG�ST 26, 1986 TO �NHOM IT MAY CONCERN : No2'ICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City�Council wil meet at 8:15 o"clock P.M. on Tue�day, September 1.6, 1986 in the City Hall Gouncil Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, ta�cansider an pplication from Michael Ha1.1ey for an amendment to the Com rehensi.ve Land Use Plan, designating the following property as Low Den�ity Residential, rather than Park. � Part of Government Lot 8,, Section 23, Township 28, Range 23, and the W 1/2 of �he N 9�rods of the W�l/2 of tYie N 5 acres, exc. the W30' thereof of Lat 1, Auditor's Subdivision Na. 2, Mendota. ( particularly, thi� land is �acated on Wachtler Avenue between Colonial Drive and Wentworth. i This notice is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Sec ian 462.355. Such persans as desire to be heard with� ref rence to the above request will be heard at this meetring. Kathleen M. Swans''on City Clerk � P AN� u Y�: REPORT C SE vUNIBEfZ: A PLIGANT: L CATiON: R TION RE(1UESTED: � P ANNING CONSIDERATIONS: zz July 198G E3616 Michael Halley West of Wachkier � South of Cherry Hil Addition (see sketch} � Amendment ta Cam Plan An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan invalves a decision� the originally proposed community park site from this proper area currently propased northeasterly of the high school sike. I amendrnent ia the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is to cti designation of this site from park to Iow density residenti � square foot lots). Attached is a drawing indicating this � change. The appropriate pubiication for the arnendrnent accomplished subsequent to the last Planning Commission meetin You will recall that at the last meeting, the City Manager in Planning Commission that the School Board had not taken for regarding the proposal ta develop a cammunity park in conjur the school facilities at the northwest corner of Highway Delaware Avenue. Without such format action, the decision 1 community park facilities to the school site is not final. Avenue, Secorid ►ia to move ty Co an Thus, the ange the at (15,OQ0 praposed has been � •med the 3i c'�Ctl4[i ion with 110 and relocate s. The Nalley platting proposal was submitted to the Park Board at its 3uly $th meeting. The Park 8oard was unable to make a decision regarding this land use change and has tabled the rnatter to its regular meeting of August 12th. � Under these circumsLances, it would appear that action on thie part of the Planning Commission for appravai or disapproval of the preiiminary plat would be inappropriate. The City has certain rights � to delay private use of property pending consideration of a public use. An approval of a preliminary plat in the meantime, however, would jeopardize those righis. Mr. Halley and his colleagues (iave been informed af this situation, but would like to appear befare the Planning Commissian in any case irrespective of a pending delay. � . Attached is a copy of the ceport prepared for the last meeting and a copy of the drawing iil'ustrating the praposed change� in ii�e Comprehensive Plan. � �.'f � " . \�'t, •�•' iy•`/� O` �\ ��_ lH tI 1 J\ � 1 1 y '• • � ' ~ ,�,� i_ �';� � • / ` r — -- 14 - . . � • / •.� . � � ;n: �: ' - .4xit t� ` f � :%S'� : � : i:. , :,'- .. �, � �: .� �._ � ; : . ; �� , t I � � ''' �� ` :� � ,,r�� , . . � � ':�: � �'.. ; � , '� / . ' . , i ; ,. ", ...�}. J� . ' � ; � , � ��.: � ' � t. ��. • � �/ �' �' / ?� a - ' � � / Ct�. �.. . .. .._. ' i� i ' � • .+I � . � �, : vi i - - - - �, 1 ^ � �r.T►�tA(L66at, ^ ,� r. . ;,:; . ,.::, � ,.,,� . --fi ; � � ;: �.. '��. � �rq,, , / � _ � � . ��.._ � • `. \ ��i�� . �_,� . rt; ;1' ' l: •� \ , , �' � ; � �� ,, " �^ . .� ,_ \ � / . ..,r'^'� - — � - - SUBJECT PROPERT�Y ' , f'�';� �, �-� - �:� �. ' � ;• ` ' J � �'` -{ a ,k'=: ��—;• �.�` I � _ \' .. .-. �. P TO L �' � � - ; . - � ' :x,��:::- ,-. , ., � -; • _�� . �' _ �_t_� , , T , , ., ' � � � :::: -, I � �-, - { :��'-� `- :.�. N O R T H � �-v' ` :� �:.�� . �:, .f �; : :ti r� ; �---=�:� i �. i� � �'� - .� •f:::�::�::::::: :=.� .�.�., -�� --�. �,} .,.�, „ �'� �i , , . � � :•• '� v . � t:'• '_' : `�, SCALE 1 0� � .f • , i: ;;: ,..._. . ,� '� .r �'` � � , � � �: k: �sa-ss�?'�' � • ' • ' � , . . - y �: �- � . __ _ . �� J,�, . / / �; .. •� � � �, `` :�:: ` ��J• � •�'� � _f _ , `', ' , ' ' —� :�:. ,1.__ ._. �% I// ��` N • . � �� 9 � '� ^_ . .. . . , /� 1 • • .�� " . � �e •:\, t�Ci `�� C I' � I _ i` , 1 'n '-�=-�--. '' L F�`� - , � � � "' � �'�� ,; L R � �� : + i` � � �;, ,� �;�, � - -- ; � ,.� �� •.,.r .�; � •:j,' 'I9 i I �• . ;, � .� • :,�''. : • ;� � . ;,� _ . - _ ,,, , • o � � .=; -1: . :; ;,� • � � ,. . . �': :�; j� :. •'.iil= i"•r•. ..�.�G:: .. . _ . t % � . ... .;� .•: v. .••. " '-P • ' _ ;� 9 . i, � ., . . . . . __.. ' /�,� . . �.,� _`..�_ _ � .,�; � °.;g�.. � t h �: . r . , ` �', . �� !� �_ � ' •i. •"4;I'•'-�•' _�..�� x �- .. �. ,�..,.{;t..�: . .; ' • ':� � • - .— "`° . '. �'-:--II`• . ... , . : . .. ..... . . . _. , ' �1�� '►o:t . • � / ....r Y ".m".°c ` �•'�_ [� � I' � •�, � '"°��` •',' • ..� '� ��#� �1 -'�' +—+I--_'-'� ` '-_' -_—'i.f . ' ��_ •f• _ .-�� . - - ' � ^'—�� - ,,,A..�� ' -�^) ,i: -. . ir.�. . , .. .�. , � ya� • • • • � � ;; :� �..A � � "'�• • � � . : �, / �. . i r, . . .. . . ' . . . ; ,: ;; , : � � � j,� . � �� u��: � . . ._... . . � . � � ;. �i-�R �r- � . �� : ..,�. .. �:�� ,-- �'� . ' ' --.Y-•--•-•T-- -- . ` � � �' �. oty �--� �`1 � ' � "' • � •-..., `T � �•- � ` �F _ .� i • ' • . +: • ; ,1 . /' V� . I . " • .' '_ , • .�. . �--- ' ,J . . �-- � — _ •,.: i; i i1/ • . • ,• .:_: ,.-'°"' `� ;l t; ' • % �11_ '� - - - I• �'. � i �' t , ..- � _ _ � � � �� ,�t1 � I� • �'`.�: • -� • . . . • ^'�•. � �t� • ' .t� • • . . r �� ; ti _ 4 _,:r.. _ `�` ' � 1 � , -- 4 .. � •' � . _ • . ;. � ' � � �'�"1 : , �,.< _ ; �,. . ' , /' LR .�wJ. -•( . , _ � �,, . _:�. �' � .1 __ w.�u : 1� , r� F � I: , y'y- ♦ . . �j� � . , �tr. � _ ; �� : .;,.; �� ,. ? �,��¢;�:-:.�. ". � . �. � � � ,., �� .��. _ � ::.t_ .� i --- � _� . . 'ii i . - - - - • ' .'.- _ . .; . " . —�� -- N I(� �� W A f p ij( ■ � � � ' I . I ♦ � � N li . '• 11 � .,� .n.. .,o. � o�...� ' .?� ��' r �� g �,.. LB., : i� � :`'� : : ;, .:, ; C'C��..., , �,. . .. � ,�;L. ` � 1 � � . . . ..� � .��-: -- � - � �`�"r�`�`� Nature ,` .�= •\- , :c� ' R. �; • !� t � I• . . • � ncc. ,t ' '— ' � � �' � -�.��::� ..f- g � ��R �;� Pr�esE �_e . ' `\ . I . i : � � � 1�,",r. .., .<<,.�,..� . I '�� :�� • �"- � ,� . I ��i; ' ';�.�c ;' .: . : � , a,K ��'ti � � ' ' , _ " � _� - - - ..... _ ; . .� �..: —._�— ----- — � — --:�.. . �. — ---- r• � �� ;� ..a. �._ � • �` • � . �� . . � '� ...G�m �. _ � .. :� .�__ L�R : � � " ' :`� � . � Y , I .�'. •;°�. 3. 4. ANNIIVG REPORT T�: SE NUMi3ER: ?LICANT: �ATIt�N: TION REGIUESTED; �1ING Ct3t�5IOERATIC,INS: 24 June 1986 . • • . r Michae! Nalley West of Wachtle So�th af Cherry t Edition (ses sketch) Approva! of Avenue, Second Plat The property in question is the aId Wacfi�tler Farm, which � the 1980 Comprehensive Plan designates as ane of two ma}or park sit'es to be acquired by the City to assist in accorr=modating future park needs. As we understand it, the Gity now proposes to abandon the � proposed acquisition of the twa sites (the Wachtler Farm north of Highway 110 and the 30 acre school pareel sauth of Friendly Hills south of Highway 110}. Instead, Lhe City plans ta acquire property north of �the higfi schoa2 to be developed in conjunction with school district property on contiguous land. Mr. Danielson informs us, however, that the � propased cooperative effort with the schaol district has not been accepted by the schoal board as yet. . Tfius, there remains some question as toj whether or not that substitute salution wi!! be workable. In view o# this outcome, we suggest that it would be appropTiate far the Planning Commission and Council ta nat take �ny action� an this plat until it can be ascertained that there is na public need far ti�e property. Mr. Danielson infarms us that he has inquired with the City Attorney as to the right of the City to delay action pending resolutian of the question. In our experience, where such instances occur, � a deiay af up . to six months has been practiced. The applicants informed us ihat due to previaus dedication 'of psrk property on the part of the underlying fee owner, no park dedicatian is required with this property. We have not checked this out officially, although this is probably correct. � A grading a�d utilities plan has been prepared and is na reviewed by the engineering sta€f. We understand ihat a se. parLion of the drainage fram this site is assigned to the interim area which was constructed about ten years aga as a part developments to the north. Portions af the pond near ihe c the site are to be rekained under private fand ownership. Howe starm sewage and grading plan daes not indicate en outlet pond. This pand Is not a controlled pond designated in the sysism. � being stantia! panding of the �ter of �er, ihe or this MICHAEL HALLEY, CASE 8616 Page �2 S. Attached is a letter from the Halley Land Corporation outlining the proposal to dedicate Lots A and B which appears to consist of approximately 5.47 acres for park purposes. You will notice in reading the letter, however, that it appears to be incomplete since it does not list the proposed improvements, the completion of which appeared to be a condition of the dedication. Obviously, this proposal should be sorted out prior to approval consideration. Mr. Frazell informs us that the park dedication proposal outline in the letter (dated June 9, 1986) be referred to the Park Board for their July 8 meeting. You will note that there are three parcels included in the preliminary plat drawing near the southeast corner of the site. We have discussed with the applicant's engineer, Jerry Sunde, whether these property owners have been contacted regarding their possible participation on the plat. Obviously, they will be effected by the extensian of , Farmdale Road to the north and Bluff Court to the west. We are also concerned about the land immediately to the south of the three parcels which may. well be served by the extension of Bluff Court southerly of this property. It is difficult terrain in that area and the method of accessing this property and the three lots to the north will be very important. 6. We suggest consideration also be given to a slight realignment of lower Colonial Drive as it intersects with Wachtler Avenue and lower Colonial Drive already built in the Cherry Hills Addition. The i�tersection will be safer if these two right-of-ways are in alignment. We have discussed this with the applicant's engineer who agrees that this can be done. 7. In summary, it appears that some additional analysis and detail can and should be accomplished on portions of the site. Until there is more definitive action regarding the major parks proposal of the City, north of and in conjunction with the high school site, we suggest the Planning Commission and Council adjourn the hearings to an appropriate date • to reasonably ascertain .the school board's reaction and decision. 9 June Mr. Ke ✓Mr. No City o 750 So� Mendots 1986 in Frazell ard Dahl�ren Mendota Heights th Plaza Drive Heights, Minnesota 55120 HALLEY LAND CORPORATION RE: "�reliminary Plat of Ivy Park" - Mendota Heights, Min Dear bt�ssrs. Frazell and Dahlgren: ta Halley Land Company has submitted an application for the plat of Ivy Park. � As you know because of a vrevious park dedicati•on, no nark dedication is req ired for the above plat.- However, the unique topograPhy of the land c n�bined with the City's pla.nning objectives for a park �in this area o Mendota Eeights prompt us to propose the following arrangement: I the City of Tiendota Heights would install in 1987 a d pay for improvements noted below, we would'dedicate f r park purposes Outlots A and B of the proposed Ivy P rk. e park improvements would not be lighted facilities. We hav� provided public access to the Outlots as shown on t plat . proposed Please i nform me whPther the C� ty has anv i.ntere�t � n. t.his p jon�sa.l . f Sincer ly, ��G- rdichae A. Presid nt P.S. MH: kl 1650 ��, Halley f you feel that you wo.uld like to have a meeting.to di'scuss this r any other aspect of the application, please advise. Otherwise, e'll assume you find our proposal satisfactory. • � • • � �helard Tower - Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 - 546-$913� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO . Planning Commission . James E. Danielson Public Works Director and Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer June 18, 1986 . Ivy Park Preliminary Plat Approval for the Wachtler Si Case No. 86-16 SCUSSION: Ha]!ey Land Corporation has prepared a preliminary plat with /�6 proposed ingle family lots on the Wachtler site. The land is presently zoned R-1. taff offers the following comments on the project: I 1. The lots as proposed all meet or exceed the requirement�for R-1 g• 2. There are some existing wetland areas on the site that are pro- sed to be filled. These wetland areas do not appear on the City original tlands maps. � 3. There are some existing structures on this property which fall hin new City street right-of-way and platted•lots. ,Demolition�permits 1 need to be acquired to have these structures removed. 4. Storm water entering this site from the northeast co b en a problem for Cherry Hills 2nd Addition residents will be t e storm water system constructed to serve the site. 5. There is a low area (wetland) located on lots 5, 6, 7, a d 12, Block 2. This low area is proposed to be partially fille t a shortage of fill material on the site, a low area in the rea t ese lots will be retained and can be used for storm water reten ' �Y;' "..A: - r s that has led by , 10, 11, but due yards of ion . 6. The developer has not indicated a use for outlots A& B�to the ity at this time. � ,_ . � . . .x, .._ , n •�'-� - ;' . . . � .•.,� ':.� :.:�-.«:;�-<... s;..>. 7. Farmdale Road along the south boundary of the site is contiguous ith some large lots that were previously not served by City streets. Staff sked the developer to show existing structures and lot lines along with �me possible subdivision capabilities. The developer has not yet+completed iat task. & e... ' ?i 8. Staff has received calls from Northern States Power Company and they are concerned about maintaining an adequate buffer with these homes and their tank farm. The farm does generate some noise and Northern States Power Company intends to acquire several more lots along Farmdale, the same as they did in Cherry Hills 2nd Addition to keep a reasonable buffer from this development too. 9. Staff has also received a call from residents of Cherry Hills 2nd Addition regarding making the lots abutting their property larger. A way to accomplish this would to be relocate Lower Colonial Drive further south and align it with Lower Colonial Drive in Cherry Hills lst Addition. 10. The Cherry Hills residents also asked that NSP be requested to relocate the overhead power lines underground. 11. Another request was to create a cul-de-sac for the now deadend Farmdale Road. 12. The Park and Recreation Commission has rated this site as their No. 2 candidate f or development as the City's large active park. The No. 1 candidate for the City's active park is to develop a park in conjunction with the 197 School District at Henry Sibley High School. Negotiations are presently underway and should be much further along within the next few weeks. Until such time as the school site has been selected as the final park candidate, approval on this site should be delayed. Staff has had converations with the City Attorney and he states that the City could delay acting on the request for 120 days without any problems. 13. There is a large amount of deferred assessments with interest against this site. Arrangements for payment need to be arrived at before final approval of the plat is made by the City. 14. See the attached letter concerning park dedication. The developer is under the impression that all the park dedication required has been made by this property. The City staff was unable to locate any documents that would confirm that statement. Pending confirmation of that allegation, a park dedication is due City either in the form of 10 percent land or $600.00 per lbt. ACTION REQUIRED: Conduct a public hearing to consider a subdivision for the Wachlter site and based on input from the public and Planning Commission make a recom- mendation to the City Council. Note: Staff recommends that his hearing be continue to the July meeting to allow more time for negotiations to continue ., with the.School District on the Park plans. . ,� . S �, . CI'1'Y OP' PiGNllO'i'A IiEICfiTS DAKOTA COUNTY, h1INNGSOTA APPLICATION FOI2 CONSIDI;RATION 01 PLANNIPJG RGQUGS'P � Applicalnt - . , Name: Halley Michael � Case No. �61-1 � Date of Application G-�- � G ree Paid 3 3 ,i' Last First . Initial j Halley Land Corporation 1 ' Addr ss: 600 Shelard Tower, ��ayzata Boulevard at Co. Rd. 18, P�pls. 1-in. 55426 •, Number & Street City , State Tele hone Number: (612) 546-8913 Z ip Owner Estate af Mary R. Wachtler Berea Collegel Name: Joseph P. Wachtler, Personal Rep. Berea, Kentucky 40404 Last . First Initial 43 White Oak Drive. Addr ss: West St. Paul, Mn. 55118 Number & Street City State Street ocation of Property in Question: " LJachtler Drive between Lower Colonial Drive and TJentworth Legal D scription of Property: , ' Type of See plans. Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.0 Minor Conditional Use Permit }�}{ . Subdivision Approval • Plan Approval ' Wetlands Permit I Other �I Zip ' � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO . 12, 1986 TO: Mayor, City Cauncil and City'��ator FRO : Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer CT: Baptist Hospital I R Bond Issue At our July 15 Council meeting, we held a hearing to�give iminary appraval far issuance of a$1,000,040 IR Bond far truction of a clinic building for the Baptist Hospital. The application far st�ate alloca�ion was approved onI Sep ember 8, and the final rasalution for issue o� the bonds has bee prepared by Briggs and Morgan, along with Roger Gardan. The iss e must close within 15 day� of the allocation. � REQUIRED: Adopt Resol.uta.on No. 86-�, autharizing issuance of $1, 04,000 Tndustrial Revenue Band� far the Bapti�t Hospi gro p. (Final resol.ution available Tuesday evening}. LESI: madlr CSTY �F MEND�TA HEIGHTS MEMO SEP�EMBER I2, 2986 TO:) Mayor and Gity Council . Kevin D. F� 1 City Adm' `s r�� . Hayber Develapment - Case No. 86-I9 Review and Discussion o� outside Legal Opinion DIS�USSION: s S se Wi th At the meeting of August 19, Council tabled further � ideration of the Mendakota Mall project, pending resalutio site planning and traffic access matters. At the me�eting ember 2, the matter was further tabled to September 1�6, at est of the developer. However, Cau.ncil did direct staff to re a legal opinion, independent o�' that o�' City Attorney hrop & Weinstine, concerning Gouncil discretian on re�zoning property. n of of the m Once again, staff has not received any further information fr the develaper which addresses Cautncil concerns. Therefare, we are recommending that Council table the item indefinitjely until th developer has addressed those concerns. You will �ind attached the requested legal opinian, as pr pared by attorney Tim Kuntz, af the LeVander Law Firm.{ This it m is being placed on the agenda so that Council may have the op ortunity ta discuss this Iegal opinion. � QN REQUIRED: Staff would recommend that Cauncil table further cr� sideration af the Mendakata Mal.l issue indefinitely until the de eloper has provided adequate information to address tYie Council co cerns previausly raised. � Staff would also recammend that Council review and discuss th memorandum from attorney Kuntz. City Attorney Tom Hart and I wi 1 be pr�pared ta answer Council questians and elaborate on the me�o as needed. No formal action an the memo seems to be re irea. KD :madlr at achment LAW OFFICES LeVa der, Gillen, Miller, Anderson & Kuntz 402 D OVERS BANK BLDG. • 633 SOUTH CONCORD ST. • P.O BOX 298 SOU�TH ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075 • TELEPHONE (612) 451-1831 M E M 0 R A N D U M 0: Mendota Heights Mayor and Councilmembers FR M: Timothy Kuntz, Attorney DA E: September 12, 1986 E: Proposed Hayber-Mendakota Development in My prE SOl ha� cit COI let HAROLD LEVANDER ARTHUR GILLEN ROGER C. MILLER HAROLD LEVANDER, Ja. PAUL H. ANDERSON TIMOTHY J. KUNTZ DANIEL J. BEESON 1 JAY R. STASSEN Section 1. Background. Because of a possible conf�Iict of erest on behalf of your regular city attorney, the City inistrator requested my office to do the following: I 1. Review and comment on the August 15, 1986 letter by your regular city attorney concerning the above mattir. 2. Make general observations concerning the discretion or latitude that the City Council has with respect to zoning vs. planned unit development standards. I office has practiced mun�cipal law for many years and sently represents the cities of Inver Grove Heights and th St. Paul. We agreed to the assignment. I Section 2. C�ty Attorney Letter of August 15,, 1986. I e reviewed the August 15, 1986 letter, together with the y zoning code and the applicable statutes. In essence, I cur with the opinions expressed in the August 15, 1986 ter. The major points are: 1 I 1. The City may not make any rezoning conditioried upon a particular development by a particular developer. 2. If the property is rezoned to B-4 (shopping center) the remaining question is whether the a.nstant c1evelopment or any other development meets the standards reczted in Section 19 of the Cxty zoning code for a planned unit development (PUD). � may condition a rezoning �upon a of a perceived problem, such as a 3. The Council reasonable solution traffic problem. 4. If the Council does rezone the property (shopping center) and later returns the classification to residential, then there may challenge to the Counczl actzon unless conditions ch to B-4 zoning �xist a inged . Me dota Heights Mayor and Councilmembers Pa e 2 Se tember 12, 1986 of co an Co co St pu ge di un zo sa ac On wh no ot by In re to re un pe th wh ag co Po al mo co. Section 3. Council Discretion. Allow me to make a� number observations. Typical land use issues are �zoning, d�tional use permits, planned unit developments, var��.ances, platting. Of all of these issues, rezonzng affords the nczl the most discretion and flexibility. Zoning is st�ll sidered an essentially legislative function. Minnesota tute 462.357, subd. 1 provides that cit�es may zone "for the pose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and eral welfare." This formulation provides the Councial wzder cretion than do decisions relating to variances, iplanned t developments, conditional uses and platting. Although a ing classificati.on must be tied to the public Ihealth, ety, morals and general welfare, the courts have generally ordeci eouncil decisions great weight. the other hand, the Minnesota Supreme Court has stat�ed that n a city has adopted standards to be met, then the �,ssue is legislative in function but rather quasi-judicial. In er words, the issue is whether the standards have b'een met the applicant. ( summary, once the counc�l, makes the legislat�ve dec�s�on to one property, the legislative function ceases wzth Irespect other permits if in fact the city does have standards ating to those other permits or approvals. The �councxl ertakes a quasi-judicial function with respect to tie other mits or approvals if there are such standards. Section 4. Present Application. If the Council instant pro�perty to B-4, then the remaina.ng ques ther the developer can obtain council approval unde eement. Mendota Heights has, by section 19.2 of it: e, adopted standards that have to be met for a P nted out in your city attorney's letter of August 1� of those standards have to be met. Your standard t city standards, relate to tradztional la� siderations such as: l. Consistency with comprehensive plan. 2. Preservation of natural amenities. 3. Harmony with existing or proposed develo the area. 4. Available financing. 5. Appropriate density. rezones :ion is a PUD zoning fD. As , 1986, �, like d use nts in Mendota Hezghts Mayor and Cauncilmembers Pa e 3 Se tember 12, 1986 Th th de zo yo standards are not so exacting so as to literally prescribe type of buszness (upscale v. discount) ar �he type of eloper that can utilize the B-4 zoning. Againr once the ing district �s in place (i.e. B-4} �he question is •whether r standards are go�ng to be me� far a PUD. � Sectian 5. Un�que or Usual Problem? The in tan� developer �could �ransfer his interest or th ag Af th go pr zn th ar su co be ag of ag Th wo co co th ex Pi7 th co� dz, cancern �hat the to anoth that there may be a subs�antzal change in the char� development between the ta.me of rezan�ng and eement, is a.n fac� legita.mate but not an unusual er rezon�ng occurs, there is always a concern about c�.ty a.s going to eventually see what it thaught ng to get or whether a new and substantially r party cter of :he PiiD :oncern. whether it was todi.fied �posal w�ll at same fa�ure date be subm�tted. Thzs cancern, the usual course of events, zs minimized by the fact tha�. � PUD agreement and a11. of the sketch plans ancl detail w.ork � submitted at the same time the rezona.ng applica;tian is �mitted. What I want to point out, however, a.s t;hat the �cern is never completely removed unta.l constructa.on actually ��zns. There are instances where the rezonzng and ythe PUD eement occur a� the same tzme, �he proj.ect never does ge�. the ground, and a new de��eloper comes back wzth anather PUD eement, recogn�.zing that the zoning a.s already ini place» .s, although a conternporaneous PUD agreement and rezaning �ld have the effect of minimiza.ng thzs abave-identified �cern, you shauld be aware that �he concern can never iple�ely be remaved. There �.s comfort, however, in�knawing �t no development can occur un��l the PUD agreemen� is �cuted and iollowed. � A basa.c question zs whether the Council belzeves �hat the ► s�.andards provide sufficient safeguard and protec�tzon to � ca.�y, a.rrespective of the charac�er of the developme � t. Sectian 6. Counc�.l Options. Section 15.1 of yourA zaning le states that the purpase of the B-4 shopping center ;tra.ct a.s as follaws: The purpose of this dzstrxct is ta establzsh pravzszons for the designating of a dzstric�. where a multiple builda.ng re�a�.l sales and servzce faca.lity can be erec�ed with zntegrated desa.gn and a coord�nated Physical plan which is a�ropriately located. Such dis�rzct shall be developed as a planned un�.t development according to an appraved�pian as provided below. � Ga.�en the emphasis on the "a.ntegrated design" and "coardinated ph sical plan" and the necessz�.y for a PCTD accorc�ing to an Me Pa Se "a to su ota He�ghts Mayor and Councilmembers 4 ember 12, 1986 roved plan", it may be the council's decision that rezoning B-4 is premature without a PUD agreement first1 being itted and considered contemporaneously therewith. � In the alternative, the council could find that a r to B-4 is appropriate, that the PUD standards are suffic safeguard the city's interests and that the two re council actions (i.e. rezoning and PUD agreement) accomplished separately. A variation of this alternativ� pass the rezoning ordinance but delay the date of publ an thus the effective date until the PUD plan is approve cl wi ag su pr Co ap wo Co no to re zoning ent to uisite an be is to cation If the council deczdes that because the B-4 district is so sely tied to a PUD agreement that it is premature to�rezone hout an approved plan, but the Council also is generally in eement with the change in the comprehensive plan, �then I gest that the counc�l authorize city staff to submit the posecl change in the comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan ncil. The City Council, at this time, would not be rovzng the proposed change in the comprehensive plan but ld merely be authorizing its submittal to the Metropol�tan ncil in order to get Metro Council approval. By doing tha.s , it would avoid any delay in the future when the City chose actually amend its comprehensive plan, and act 'on the oning and the PUD agreement. � TJI� : C j ID�196I � 22, 1986 CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO [ TO:� Mayor, City Council and City , Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer CT: 1987 Budget and Levy Resolut Based on the changes suggested at the public hearing on September 2, we foI owing changes �.n the final budget � mi 1. Increase Council budget to 2. Transfer Equipment Certi�ica ating capital outlay in amau i ' s , atar the Council warksh :�ave incorporated t �hich is attached. error purchase to ope of 3. Increase tax levy to reflect�Capital Qutlay 4. Compute final police and fire contracts on tentative budget resul.ting zn increase revenue c 5. Ad;ust contingency fund fram�$10,600 to $15,404 to reflect additional revenue from contracts reduced by correctian in Cou�cil budget, 6. Establish an infrastructure reserve fund in the amount of $50,000. � ad on our preliminary a�sessed value, the levy resalut �ented results in a raw levy of 14:"79 mills, a reducti Ls from the raw levy of 1986. � QN REQUTREDt and $ 600 33,630 33r630 5,000 ion as �n af .58 Approve r�vised budget as presented and adopt Levy Resolution Na. 8&-T, ta certi.fy the levy to the�Dakata Co�nty Auditor. a :madlr �chment . ; CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION APPROVING 1986 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1987 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Hei hts, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the following sums of mon y be levied for the current year, collectible in 1987�upon tax ble property in said City of Mendota Heights for the iollowing pur oses: General Fund Emergency Preparedness Fireman's Relief Association Metropolitan Sewer Debt Watershed District Equipment Certificates Park Bonds Debt Service & Special Levy Equipment Certificates Ivy Falls Drainage Improvement Water Improvement Bonds Infrastructure Reserve TOTAL TAX LEVY: $ 1,152,630 500 12,250 6�5, 000 12,500 35,215 49,000 $ 1,327,095 74,785 17,400 5,700 50,000 $ 1,474,980 The�City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certif of his Resolution to the Dakota County Auditor. � Kat ed by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heigh day of September, 1986. T: een M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA By Robert G. Lo Mayor copy this IGHTS ... 0 CITY 4F MENDOTA HEIGii`rS �'• �epternber � TO: Mayar, City Cauncil and City i�✓ t� tar FROM: James E. Daniel�on Public Works Director St7BJECT. Sewers, Water, Streets Copperfield �ubdivisian Phase I Job No. 8517 Improvement No. 85, Project No. 4 DISCUSSION: 0 .a, �.�� Sta�f has preparad the attached assessment roll for the Copperfield I Subdivision. The Developer ia paying the assessments for the'�1ots and has executed a waiver of hearing. RECON[MENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached assessmen� roll be approved and adopted as prepared so tha� the Developer can pay the assessmen��s far the lots tha� have been sold and any unpaid ones aan be certified with the County this fail. ACTZC?N REQIJIRED: If �he Cauncil wishes ta implement the staff recommendatian they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 86- � RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASBESSMENTS FOR SEWEE2, WATER, STORM SE4�IE12, STREETS AND CiTRB AAIL? GIJTTER IMPROVEMENTS TC} SERVE CQPPERF'IELD PHASE I SITBDIVISION ��MPRFQVENiENT NO. 85, PROJEGT N0. 4) j m to sew the City of Mendata Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RF�OLUTION N0. 86- RESOLUTION ADC}PTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR SEtdER, WATER STORM SEWER, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE COPPERFIEL�D SUBDZVISION PHASE I{ZMPROVE�NT N0. 85, PR4JECT N4. 4) ° RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights as fol- �AS, the City Clerlc, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has ilated the proper amounC ta be specially assessed �or the casts incurred �te with respect to Improvement No. 8S, Project No. 4, cons�ruction af �, water, storm sewer, streets and curb and gutter improvements �o serve :ollowing described praperty situated in �he City of Mendota Heights, :a Caunty, Minneso�a, more particularly de'scribed as follows: I Copperfield Subdivision Phase I WHE EAS, the awner of �he above described property ha� previously signed a WSl @i 4� Ii81Z'iIlg. � NQW THEREFORE, this Gouncil, finds that each of the lots, pieces and�parcels of and enurnberated in the propased assessment ro11 was and is specially ben fited by �he construction of said improvements in not less �han the amo nt of the assessment, as corrected, set oppasi�e the description�af each suc lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount sa set out is hereby 1.evied agains� each af the respective Iots, pieces�and par els of land therein described; and BE T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed assessment ro1l is hereby adapted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots; pieces and parcels af land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, tog ther with interest at �he rate of nine percent (9%) per annum accruing on he full aanttaun� thereof from time ta time unpaid, sball be a lien concur- ren with general taxes upan such parcel and a11 Chereoi. 'I'he �otal�amount of ach such assessmenC as to sanitary sewer, starrn sewers and watermain� sha 1 be payable in equal amounts extending over a period of nineteen (19) yea s and each assessment as to streets, curb and gutter shall be payable in equ 2 amounts extending over a periad of ten (IO} years; the first af said ins allments, together with interest on the entire assessment commencing thi ty {30} days from the date hereof to December 31, 2986, ta be pa�yablE wit general taxes for the year 1986, collectible in 1987 (now designated as rea estate taxes payable in 1987}, and one af each af the rema:ining! in- sta lments, �.agether wa.th one year's interest on that a.nd a11 a�her �unpaid ins llments, ta be payable with general taxes for each consecutive ,qear the eafter until the entire assessment is pai.d; and � BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the Co nty Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment roll with each then un aid installment and interest set forth separately, to'be extended upon th proper tax Iists of the County, and the Caunty Auditor shall thereafter ca lect said assessments in �he manner provided by law. � Ad pted bp the City Council of the City of Mendota Aeights this 16th day of Se tember, 1986. ( � _ thieen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY CQUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �.� G. Lockwoad, � TO: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September Mayor, City Council and City/`' ��tor .. Klayton Eckles Civil Engineer 10, 1986 SUB ECT: Sewers, Water, Streets Feasibility Report Deer Trail Hills Job No. 8623, Improvement No. 86, Project No. 1 INT T of dev sub ali are lot san dur the dra W DUCTION is report conerns the development of a parcel that li he Evergreen Knolls subdivision. Staff worked closel loper during the preliminary platting stages to insur ivision could easily be served by city utilities. An nment requires excessive storm sewer construction or that can be served. The subdivision as proposed cal , all of which are to be served by, city utilities. T truction considerations and costs.of each of the util idered in the following paragraphs. TARY SEWER s just west with the that the new other street educes the s for 12 ties are ie sanitary sewer will serve the development from the �existing .tary sewer mains along Wachtler Avenue. There are existing stubs - each of the proposed street intersections which were�,installed _ng the Evergreen Knolls project for just this purpose�. The cost of entire sanitary sewer installation as shown on the attached iings is $40,782.� ,TERMAIN ie subdivision will be served by water from the existing stubs at itler Avenue. One connection will require a small portion of itler to be disturbed, but there is a stub so the expensive procedure a� doing a tap inta the existing can be avoided. A 30' easement has been requested between the two cul-de-sacs so that the watermain can be looped far better fire protection service and water quality. The cost for con�tructing the watermains, a� shown on the attached drawings, amounts to $34,951. STC}RMSEWER This project will require very little s�.arm sewer thanks to the existing natura3. drainage patterns, the small siz� af the develapment and the existing storm sewer system along Wachtler Avenue. Only a f�w catch basins and pipe leads from the existing sys�.em at Wachtler will be necessary in order to serve the area. The cost of this storm sewer construction amounts to $8820. The propo�ed development cal].s for one 350' long s�reet with a cul- de-sac, and one 280' Iong street w2th a hammer.head turnaround. The street with the cul-de-sac wi11 intersect Wachtler at Evergreen Knoll sa that a 4 way intersection will be created. The hammerhead turnaround on the ather street is recammended because there are anly 2 houses being served at the end of the street. Since it is a very low valume street, it is propo�ed that this street be 27' wide to discourage unnecessary use of it. Also, a 27' wide street will not require as much right af way, The total cost to install the�e streets as �hown on the attached drawings is estimated to be $32,305. The tatal cost for improvements to the proposed Deer Trail Hills subdivi�ian is as iollaws: UTILITY Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Street TOTAL ASSESSMENTS CONSTRUGTION COST $44,782 34,951 $,$30 32,305 $126,858 It is praposed that all costs associated with canstructing the utilities for this praject will be covered by assessments. Since only this subdivisian benefits from the project, onl�r lots within the subdivision should be asse�sed, At the developer's request, the � asse thes Knoi asse will all will T I cau hav How col sments can be split evenly among all twelve lots. In,addition ta assessments, there are deferred assessments from the+ Evergreen s project totall.ing $48,854. This brings the tatal amaunt to be sed to $165,712. Divided by twelve lats the assessment per Zot be $I3r808 far sewer, water, storrn sewer, and streetsi. Because ssessments will be levied against lots within the subdivisian, it not be necessary to hold an assessment hearing. � the proposed project is ordered to be constructed, t begin grading his property a� eariy as this fall. the plans done this fall, so construction could begi er, it does not appear as ii there is enough time le season to get the �treets finished. At best, on].y t could be done this year. This is often a desired sc ruction because the streets have a chance to settle TION: O the basis �ar the request far p�zblic utilzties to se pro osed Deer Trail Hills subdivision, it is possible and do o using the methad shawn on the attached preliminary dra ing�, and staff recammends the construction of the pr rec mmends Gouncil direct staf� to bega.n preparation of p sub ect to the receipt of a final plat from the developer ava lable shortly. ACT$ON REQUIRED: mot ENG AND If Council concurs with the staff recammendation they on adopting Resolutian No. 86- , RESOLUTION ACCEPT NEERING REPORT, ORDERING IMPRt1VEMENT, AND PREPARATION SPEGIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATER, STQRM SEWE ET C{�NSTRUGTION TO SERVE DEER TRAIL HILLS (IMPROVEMEN ECT NO. 10) ; developer aff could this year. before the underground duling of I winter. ve the feasible to esi.gn ject. Staif ans and specs whieh will be shauld pass a OF PLANS S, AND NO. $6, � WHER: resp� Deer wit par City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- OLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PR�EPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWERS, AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE DEER TRAIL HILLS� (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 10) �AS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with �ct to the prposed construction of the following improvements to serve Trail Hills to-wit: I The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, in- cluding appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisiti�on of ease- ments, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and eas�ements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. � The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisi�tion of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and in- cidental thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and for th�e area hereinafter more particularly described. . The construction of street.improvements consisting of the acquis�ition of easements and the ;grading, stabilization, drainage and bituminous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the street�s to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. � �AS, the area proposed to be� assessed for said improvements is situated �n the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and ls more .cularly described as follows: 1 Deer Trail Hills WHER AS, in said report said City Engineer reported that the proposed improve- ment and construction thereof were feasible and desireable and furtlier reported on t e proposed cost of said improvements. NOW EREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heig ts, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby received. 2. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary thal City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improveme� and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 1 the s, 3. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and directed ta prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. 4. That said improvement shall hereaf�er be known and designated as Im- provement No. $6, Project Na. 10. Adopted by the City Council af the City of Mendo�a Heights this 16�h day af - September, 1986. CITX COUNCIL CITY OF MENDQTA HEIGHTS By Rober� G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTEST : Kathleen M. Swanson City Clark 1' - � To: Re: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Mayor and City Council : Kevin Frazell City Administrator Metropolitan Council Model Noise Ordinance ION MEMO September 4, 1986 As promised, the Metropolitan Council has produced a mod 1 aircraft noise ordinance that local governments can ado t to comply witY�=•the Guidelines for Land-Use Com atibilit with Aircraft Noise. A draft of that ordinance is ttached for your review. We are invited to submit co ents to be considered by the Council, before it adopts a fin 1 document in early October. Council will recall that the Metropolitan Council has indicated that it will requi�e us o adopt this ordinance, or similar land control leg'slation, before it will approve our Comprehensive Plan ame dment for the Southeast Area. � ; DIS�USSION An earlier, and highly similar, draft of the ordinance was reviewed by Building Inspector Paul Berg, Larry Sha ghnessy, Planner John Shardlow, and me. For the most par , we feel the ordinance is acceptable. In fact, it seems to e a model of simplicity for such a complicated subject. Pau Berg is satisfied that he would be able to enforce the law without any extensive training. j Despite our generally positive reaction, staff does sug est that we offer the following comments: 1. The ordinance creates building restrictions with"in noise contours (referred to as Appendix A). These contours were developed in 1979, based on a Leq standard of acceptable noise. The FAA Part 150 study currently underway by the Metropolitan Airports Commission will also create restricted noise contours, but based on a Ldn standard. These standards are less restrictive in the amount of land area covered. In adopting a model ordinance, the Metropolitan Council should address this discrepancy so that local governments are not left with two conflicting sets of regulations. 2. Section 10 of the proposed ordinance sets forth six specific requirements for construction within noise contours. The Council should make some estimate of the additional construction cost created by these mandates. It should also determine the impact on market feasibility for various types of development. • 3. The Metropolitan Council has previously expressed its expec�a°tion that developments in noise sensitive areas will include some type of disclosure program for buyers and renters, administered either by the local government or the developer. An earlier staff draft of the model ordinance addressed this issue, but it seems to have been deleted from the present draft. The City of Mendota Heights continues to feel that this could be a particularly onerous requirement, and requests that the Council address this issue either in the model ordinance, or in a simultaneous document. ACTION REQUIRED To consider the comments suggested by staff, as well as any others raised by Council or the public, then direct staff to draft a letter to the Metropolitan Council conveying our comments and concerns. Augus� 26, 1986 Kevin Frazell City f Mendota Heights 750 S. Plaza Dr. Menda a Heights, MN 55120 Dear r. Frazell: -'�'�N ctiT+w` Me 3Q0 Met Seventh St. Paul rapalitan Cauncil � Square Building �d Robert Streets Minnesota 5510i Telepharie {612} 293-6359 �'� � , �, w • �� , �,, IJ '' v' Enclo ed for your review and comment is a draf t of a praposed Model Ordinance for Aircraft Naise Attenuation. The proposed mode] ordinance is inten;ded to be a toa for locai gavernmenis to use in implerrtenting the Meiropolitan Councii`s Guid lines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. The guidel��ines discaurage the canstructian of single-f amily homes, schoois, churches `and haspitals in noisy areas araund airparts. The guidelines also require' that stru ures l ocated wi thi n an .a� rcraft nai se zone be constructed us i rtg 'sound insulation techniques ta minimixe•the effects of�aircraft noise in the interior af t e structure. The propose� model ordinance pravides�a means for ]�oca1 unit af government to require specified leveis af saund insuiaiian in new stru tures and in any re�;onstructed portion or addition to existing structures iaca ed in an aircraft noise zone. Locai gavernments are nat resiricted fram maki g changes in the model nor fi rom propasing other implementing models af thei awn making as long as ihe standards in the Council's guidelines�are achi ved. ihe r�odel ordinance requires an appiicant for a building permit to ei in a oustical attenuatian according ta the building plans approved by buii ing inspector, ar to retain a recagnized acoustical specialist t that the type af building canstruction proposed would satisfy the noi redu tion level standards set f arth in the ordinance. The materiais cont in genera1ized maps showing the adopted Aircraft Noise Zones for the AC aperated airports. Large sca]e detaiied maps of these contou prev ousiy provided to each community impacted by airport noise. The is c rrently working on a process for local governments to refine the her bui i d the local certify e ttached each of s were Council e cont urs. � Yaur written cornments, questions or suggestions on the draft ordinance would he appr ciated by or before September 26, 1986. After that date, the Council's Metr paTitan and Ca��nuniiy Development Cammittee wi11 review the madel and we r If � 29I- Sin� anc Cha� �ntary. In an effart to make the model available f ar local government use, pe the Metropolitan Council can take final action early in Octob�r. �u have any questions, please call Bob Davis of the Council staffl at 3I7. � �Y� a S. Gardebring An Equal Opportunity Empioyer ORAFT �SUBJECT TQ CHANGE MQDEL ORDINANCE FOR AIRCRAFT NOISE ATTENUATiON Revised An ardinance pramoting the health, saf ety and general welf are of the citizens of , Minnesota, by amending the zoning ordinance and code and by adopting new sections, requiring compliance with noise reduction standards in building construction. Secti�n i Statutory Autharity This �rdinance is adopt�d pursuant ta Minn, Stat. Sec. 462.357. Secti�n 2 Findings of Fact The C city autho in ar atten and w prope inter � r ui healt Sect i81I2f86 ty of finds that development within certain area,s of the s impacted by aircraft noise; that said noise is beyond the regu3atory � ity af the city to control; that certain uses of land are inappr;opriate as af high aircraft naise; that sarrse siructures da not adequatel,y ate aircraft noise resulting in negative impacts an the health,�safety •� lf are of the residents or inhabitants of the structures; that, through construction methads, the means exist to attenuate aircraft noi�se ta or levels which alleviate such negative impacts; and that the � ements of this ordinance are necessary ta promoie and preserve the , safety and welfare of the citizens of . � 3 Pur pse The urpose of this ordi'nance is to require that new or redeveloped b� within the City of � be constructed with materia1s and in mann r that aircraft noise is attenuated by ihe structure to an interi whic has no adverse impact an the health, saf ety and general welf arej resi ents, aii in accardance wiih ihe Metropolitan COU27Ci1's guidelinE Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. � Sect�an 4 Definitions For urposes of this ordinance the terms defined in this seciion have mean ngs given them in this section. ildings such a ar ievel of the s for the AIRC AFT NQISE ZONE. Aircraf t Noise Zone means any one of the four zones iden ified on the map attached hereta as Appendix A and incorporaied herein. dBA. dBA means a unii of saund pressure level weighted by use of the{A mete ing characteristics and weighting as specified in the American N,ational Stan ards Institute Specification for Sound Level Meters (ANSI S1.4-1�983), whic is hereby incorparated by reference. dSA is aiso referred to Is an A- wei4 ted decibel. Leq. Leq means the equivalent continuous sound level which aver the 'period of a e hour has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time varying�sound. Ldn. contin midnig IQ p.m, NOISE exteri interv RECOGN person buildi approv of sou acaust proces 2 .dn means the day-night average level, or the 24-haur equivalent �ous sound level (time-averaged A-weighied sour�d ievel} fram �idnight to it, abtained af ter the addition af 1Q dBA to sound levels measured from , to 7 a.m. � ,EDUCTIQN LEVEL. Noise reduction 1eve1 means the difference between the ar and interior sound level, expressed in dSA, which is achieved�by the �ning structure. ZED ACOUSTICAL SPECIALIST. A recognized acoustical specialist means a qualified by education and experience to conduci sound analysis�of gs and approved far such purpose by the city's building inspector. The d individual shall have at least three years of experience in the field d cantrol; a degree from a recagnized institute af higher learning in cs or a closely related discipline; and demonstrated expertise in the af saund analysis af buildings. � SOIlNO. Sound means energy that is transmitted by pressure waves�in ihe air or in ot er materials and is the objective cause of the sensation of hear�ng. It is ca anly called noise if it is unwanted. � SOUND ATTENUATION, Soun'`d�-attenuation means the reductian in sound level which occur between the source and receiver. � . SOUND �.EAK. Sound Ieak means an apening in a structure thraugh which socsnd can pass. Sound leaks are often extremely small holes or cracks. In general, an ai r 1 ak i s a saund 1 eak . SOUND L.EVEI.. Saund level means the ]evel of sound pressure measured with a sound 1eve1 meter and one of its weighting (freguency) networks. WhenfiA- weigh ing is used, the sound level is expressed as dBA. � SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS (STC). Sound transmission class means a sing1e-number ratin for describing ihe degree of sound transmission ioss specified ifar a wall, window, partition or other building element. The higher the STC�, the mare ttenuatian the bui]ding elernent wili afford. � Secti�n 5 Scope and Effect The A distr parce estab subje regul permi distr obtai Noise herei recon eff ec breez ordin requi� rcraf t Noise Zones established by this ordinance shall overlay the zoning cts esiablished by Ordinance No. adapted so thai any of land lying in an overlay zone shall also lie in one or more�of the ished zoning districts. Territory within a given�overlay zane sha31 be t to the requirements established"by the other applica6le ardinances and tions of the city. Within each adopted overlay zone, all uses shall be ted in accordance with the regulations far the underlying zoning cts, provided, however, that the appropriate building permit is�first ed, and pravided further that no use designaied as inconsisteni on the Compatibility Tables, attached hereto as Appendix B and incorporated , sha13 be permiited. This ardinance applies ta a11 construction and any tructed portion of a building requiring a building permit after{the ive date of this ordinance except decks, patias, swirrming paols; ways and simiiar outdoar uses. In the case of conflict between this nce and any other applicable codes or ordinances, the more restrictive ement shall be met. 3 Section 6 Prerequisites to Issuance of Building or Occupancy Permit Any application for a City of building or occupancy permit pertaining to land located in an Aircraf t Noise Zone must demonstrate compliance with the provisions of this ordinance prior to the issuance of such permit. Section 7 Establishment of Zones The following Aircraft Noise Zones are hereby established as part of the zoning ordinance of . Aircraf t Noise Zone I Aircraft Noise Zone II Aircraft Noise Zone III Aircraft Noise Zone IV The boundaries of the Aircraf t Noise zones are as delineated on the diagram attached hereio as Appendix A and incorporated herein. Section 8 Noise Compatibility Tab�es � } .�, The Noise Compatibility Tables (Appendix B) are adapted f rom the Metropolitan Council's Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noi•se. The Noise Reduction Level numbers, expressed in dBA, specify f or each type of land use the amount of interior sound level reduction necessary for the use to be compatible in the applicable Aircraft Noise Zone. All construction or reconstruction requiring a building permit and located within an Aircraft Noise Zone shall be constructed in such a way that the applicable noise level reduction requirements contained in the Noise Compatibility Tables are met or exceeded. Where a particular structure contains diff erent land uses, the more stringent requirements of the applicable table shall apply, except where it is architecturally possible to achieve the appropriate noise reduction level for each diff erent use, and the uses are acoustically separated by a wall or partition with a minimum STC of 25. Sect9on 9 Enf orcement The City of building inspector is authorized and directed to enf orce the provisions of this ordinance pursuant to Sections IO and 11. Section 10 Plans and Specifications A. All applicants for a building or occupancy permit shall include with the application all plans, specifications or other inform ation required by this ordinance. The plans and specifications shall describe in sufficient detail all pertinent features of the building, building materials, heaiing and ventilation systems, including but not limited to the STC ratings of roof/ceilings, walTs, windows, and doors; and other pertinent data as may be requested by the building inspector to indicate conformance with the 'applicable noise reduction leve] requirements as specified in the Noise Compatibility Tables. To assure the elimination of sound leaks, the plans and specifications shall demonstrate compliance with the following standards. 1, 4 A mechanical ventilation system shall be installed that will provide the minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirementslas provided in the Uniform Building Code for the proposed occupancy without the need to open any exterior doors or windows. � 2.I The perimeter of all exterior windows and door f rames shall be sealed airtight to the exterior wall construction. 1 3.� Fireplaces shall be equipped with well-fitted chimney cap devices. 4. All ventilation ducts, except range hoods, connecting interio'r space to outdoors shall be provided with a bend such that no directlline of sight exists from exterior to interior through the vent duct. 5. Doors and windows shall be constructed so that they are close� fitting. Weatherstripping seals shall be incorporated to eliiinate all edge gaps. 6� All penetrations through exterior walls by pipes, ducts, cond'uits and the like shall be caul•ked airtight to the exterior construction. T e building inspector may require that plans and specifications be � c rtified by a Recogrr�zed Acoustical Specialist for compliance with this o dinance. 6. W thin 30 days of receipt of appropriate plans and specifications, the b ilding inspector shall approve or reject the plans based upon the ability o the proposed materials and construction techniques to adequately a tenuate noise. The building inspector shall approve the plans �nd s ecifications if: i 1 They adequately»document the use of construction assemblies t�hat meet or exceed the STC ratings required by the following table: STC RATINGS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS SPECIFIED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION REQUIRED STC RATING NEEDED FOR COMPLIANCE* dBA Roof/Ceiling Walls Windows Doors 20 40 40 30 25 45 45 35 30 50 • 50 40 35 55 � 55 45 40 60 60 50 *All values + 2 STC. The STC laboratory test of constructioi materials and assemblies must be conducted according to the requirements of the American Society for Testing and Materia' E90 OR ASTM E 336); or 20 25 30 35 40 Is (ASTM 2. 0 5 They have been certified by a Recognized Acoustical Specialist�as achieving the interior noise level reduction required by the applicable portion of the Noise Compatibility Table. the event that the drawings are rejected, the reasons for such rejection �11 be submitted to the applicant in writing. No construction sh�all :ur prior to the approval of appropriate plans and specifications. All �struction shall be performed in accordance with the approved plans and �cifications. Construction done in accordance with the approved plans I specifications as determined by the building inspector shall bei deemed meet the noise attenuation requirements of this ordinance. Sectidn 11 Inspections A. A a B. F s P S Secti� The b and e Secti If an illeg such 1 construction or work bject to inspections by tenuation work shall be nstruction inspections de. � for which a building permit is required siiall be the building inspector. Inspections of noise perf ormed during the required building specified by the City of eld Testing. When inspection indicates that the construction is cordance with the a�proved plans, the building inspector may ord� rrective action as may be necessary to meet the noise attenuatio� quirements of this ordinance. In lieu of performing such correc tion a building owner may submit a test report based upon field owing campliance with the noise reduction level requirements con e applicable Noise.Compatibility Table. The field test shall be �rformed in accordance with the American Society f or Testing Mate andard E 336-84, Part A1.2.2. Outside to Inside (Level Reduction �n 12 Fees iilding inspector. is authorized to collect f ees to cover administ iforcement costs. This f ee shall be $ 13 Severability iuilding not in � �r such r � tive �ests ' tained in Iials )• rative part of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise 1, the remainder of this ordinance shall remain in force and eff ect as if nenf orceable provision had not been included herein. I at C� NOISE COMPATIBTLITY TABI�E 1 Noise Reduction Leve1 in dSA Required ta Meet Standard Far Use 1INNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AIRPORT IN NEW DEVELqPMENT AND MAJQR REDEVEL LAND USE TYP�2 Res i denti al � Single/multi iex with individual entranc� Multiplex/ap rtment with shared entrance Mobile Home . • AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONE I II Leq (80+) (75-80) INC4 INCO INCO 35 INCO INCO III (70-75) INCQ 30 INCO OPMENT1 IV (65-70) 25 25 25 Educational and t�edical .� � . �.:, Schools, chu ches, hospitals, nursing homes ING4 INCO INCQ 25 "�1ltural Entertainment Recreational 35 30 25 20 Office Com ercial Retail � 35 30 25 CNST ; f Services � 1 � i Transportation-passenger f acilities 35 30 25 CNST Transient L dging INCO 30 25 20 Other medic 1, health and educational services 35 30 25 CN5T 4ther servi es 35 30 25 CNST Industriai Communication Utilit 25 . CNST CNST CNST A ricultural Land Water Area Resource Ex ractian CNST CNS7 CNST CNST I As define in the Metropalitan Council's Aviation Chapter of the Metropa itan Deve]apmeni Guide � Applicabl for aff-airport use only 3 These use da not permit "in the wall" air-conditioning units in zones I, II and III. INCO means nconsistent CNSi means onsistent % + � f ' • i NOISE COMPATIBILITY TASLE 2 Noise Reduction Level in d6A to Meet Standard For Use at MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AIRPORT INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS i0 EXISTING STRUCTURESl LANQ USE TYPE2 - I L eq { 80�- } Residential Single/multiplex with individual entranc�3 40 Multiplex/a�artment with shared entrance . 4Q Mobiie Home _ _ _ 40 Educational and Medical �.�. Schools, churches, hospitals, nursing homes� Cultural, Entertainment, Recreational Office, Commercial Retail AIRCRAFT NOISE ZQNE II III {75-$Q} (70-75} 35 30 35 3Q 35 30 40 35 35 30 30 25 35 30 25 Services Transportation-passenger f acilities 35 Transieni l.odging 35 Other medical, health and educational services 35 Other services 35 30 �a 30 34 25 25 25 25 0 IV �65-70} 25 25 . 25 . V' .25 �a CNST CNST zo CNST CNST Industrial, Communication, tltiiity 25 .. . CNST CNST CNST Agricultural Land, Water Area� Resource Extraction � CNST CNST CNST CNST 1 As defined in the Metropolitan Council`s Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide � Applicable for off-airpori use oniy 3 These uses do not permit "in the wall" air-conditioning units in Zones I, II and III. INGO means inconsistent � CiVST means consisten� S7 LAND USE TYB 0 NOISE COMPATIBILITY TABLE lA � Noise Reduction �evei in dBA Required to Meet Standard for Use at '. PAUL DOWNTOWN AIRPORT IN NEW DEVELOPMEN7 AND MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT1 EZ AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONE I II III Ldn (70-75) (65-7Q) (60-65) Residential Singlejmult"plex with individual entranc� INCO INCQ INCO Multiplex/a artment with shared entrance INCO 25 20 Mobile Home INCO INCO INCO Educational and Medical .� t� Schools, ch rches, hospitals, nursing homes INCO INCO INGO ':ultural E tertainment Recreational 25 20 CNST Office Com ercial Retail ' 25 20 CNST + , I I Services ? � , Transportation-passenger f acilities 25 20 CNST Transient Ladging ZNCO 20 CNST Other medical, health and educational services 25 � 20 CNST Other services 25 20 CNST Industrial Communication Utilit CNST CNST CNST A ricultur 1 Land Water Area Resource E traction CNST CNST CNST � As defin•d in the Metropolitan Cauncil's Aviation Chapter of the Metrop litan Development Guide � Applicable for off-airport use only 3 These us s do not permit "in the wa11" air-conditioning units in Zone I. INCO means inconsistent CNS1' means consistent IV (55-60) CNST CNST CNST 4 CNST CN5T CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST r'� Appendix B NOISE COMPATIBILITY TABLE 2A Noise Reduction Level in d6A to Meet Standard For Use at ST. PAUL DOWNTOWN AIRPORT INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES1 LAND USE TYPE2 AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONE I Ldn (70-75) Residential Single/multiplex with individual entrance3 30 Multiplex/apartment with shared entrance-3- 30 Mobile Home 30 Educational and Medical Schools, churches, hospitals, nursing homes3 30 Cultural, Entertainment, Recreational 25 Office, Commercial Retail 25 Services Transportation-passenger f acilities 25 Transient Lodging 25 Other medical, health and educational services 25 Other services 25 II III (65-70) (60-65) 25 20 25 20 25 20 25 20 20 CNST 20 . CNST 20 20 20 20 CNST CNST CNST CNST Industrial, Communication, Utility CNST CNST CNST AQricultura� Land, Water Area, Resource Extraction CNST CNST� CNST 1 As defined in the Metropolitan Council's Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide 2 Applicable for off-airport use only 3 These uses do not permit "in the wall" air-conditioning units in Zone I. INCO means inconsistent CNST means consistent IV (55-60) CNST . CNST . CNST �• CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST I �AND USE �2 14 Appendix B NOISE COMPATIBILITY TABLE IS � Noise Reductian Level in dBA Required to Meet Standard For Us� at MINQR AIRPQRTS - NEW DEVELOPMENT ANO MAJQR REDEVELOPMENT AiRCRAFT NQISE ZONE I II III Ldn (70-75) (65-70) (60-65� Residential Singlelmul�'plex with individual entrance . INCO INCO . INCO Muitiplex%a artment with shared entrance INCO ` 25 • 20 Mobile Home - -.. INCO INCQ INCO Educational and Medical }.�:. Schools, churches, hOSpitals� nursing homes INCO iNCO INCQ .:ultural Entertainment Recreatianal 25 20 .. , CNST Office C mercial Retail � 25 20 CN5T , i � $L't"V1 C@S � , � Transporta ion-passenger f acil�ties 25 20 CNST Transient odging ! 25 20 CNST Other medi al, health and educational services 25 20 CNST Other servi ces 25 20 CNST In�ustriai Cammunication Utiiit CNST CNST CNST A ricul�ur ] Land Water Area Resource E;;traction ' CNST CNST CNST i As defin d in ihe Metropalitan Council's Aviatian Chapter af�the Metrop iitan Development Guide 2 Appiicab e far aff-airpart use anly 3 Applicat on to areas autside the Metropalitan Urban Service Area (MUSA� anly INCO means 9nconsistent ;NST means consistent IV 60)3 . CNST CNST .. CNST. �• .CNST CNST CNS7 CNST CNST CNST CNSi' CNST CNST 1i ' � • '•t- • : � NOISE COMPATIBILITY TA61.E 28 NOISE REDUCTIqN LEVEL IN dBA TO MEET STANDARq FOR USE AT MINOR AIRPQRTS It�FILL DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS TO EXISTFNG STRt1CTURES� LANO USE TYPE2 - I l.dn {70-75) Residential Single/multiplex with individual entranc��' 30 Multiplexja�ariment wiih shared entrance 30 Mobile Home _ _ ._ 30 Educational and Medical a<:. Schaols, churches, haspitals, nursing hames4 Cultural, Entertainment, Recreationai Office, Commercial Retail AIRGRAFT NOISE ZONE II III {b5-70} {60-65} 25 20 25 24 25 20 30 25 25 2Q � Ser.vi ces Transportation-passenger f acilities 25 Transient Lodging 25 Other medical, health and educational services 25 4iher services 25 20 20 20 20 Za 20 CNST CNST CNST CiVST CNST CNSi Industrial, Communicationz Utiliiy CNST CNS7 CNST Agricultural Land, Water Area, Resource Extraction CNST CNST CNST 1 As defined in the Metropolitan Council's Aviation Chapter of the Metrapa3itart Developrnent Guide 2 Applicable for off-airpart use oniy 3 Application ta areas outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area {MUSA� only � These uses da noi perrn�t "in the wali" air-conditioning units in Zone I CNST means consistent ms4220 TV (55-60}� CNST C1VST ., CNST , �. GNST CNST CNST CNST CNST CNST C1UST CNSi CNST CITY 4F MEND�TA HEIGHTS MEMO 1Q, 1986 TO: Mayor and City Cou�cil FRO : Kevin D. z � City Ad 's r qr Nov a m wil is mee ar el . Rescheduling of Firs� Meeting o� November Our usual date far the first meeting in November, Tuesday, mber 4, is General Electian Day. L•egally, we can notf conduct eting until after 8:04 P.M.,.and practically, space and staf� nat b� available for a meeting that evening. Theref;ore, it ecommended that Council select an alternative date for that ing. � � Staff is recommending that the meeting be r�scheduled for the ing of Thursday, November 6. This will give the City Clezk'S ce an apportunity ta tabuiate the rasults of the Council tion in time for canva�sing by the Council. � AC�ZON REQUIRED: mo If Council cancur� with this recommendation, it should pass a ion changing the date af the first meeting in November from sday, Navember 4, to Thursday, Novembar 6, at 7:30 P.�. ; :madlr . SEPT] TO: FROM CITY OF MEND�TA HEIGHTS MEM� 12, 1986 Mayor and City Council Kevin D. F l�� City Adm` i . Architect Lindberg Fierce Design Experience At your direction, I asked our City Hall architects, �Lindberg Pier e, to provide us with additional information about tiieir desi n experience. Subsequent ta putting together Tuesday eve ing's agenda, I met with them an Friday afternoon, and they pro ided me with the attached materials. I am sending it�along far your review, sa we can add it to Tuesday' s agenda� - for dis ussion. � They havs also offered to bring out color slides of some of the projects and/ar take us an a tour of some of their more recent mun'cipal projects,�including remodeling and expar�sion af�the New Bri hton City Hall, and remodeling o� the Inver Grave Heights Cou cii Chamber. You may notice in the attached materials that Dic Guilyard was respansible for the remadeling of the St. Loui� Par Council Ghamber, which we saw on our tour. � ACT ON REQUIRED: + 1 Staff will be recommending that this item be added to the age da Tuesday evening so that we can discuss how we wish ta pro eed with iinaSizing an architect to wark with us fln design af the new City Hall. ( KDFI: madlr asure �+uarc�y rzCra;r, �nc. �ite 710 �0 F'trst Ave. North inneapolis, Minnesata 55403 i 2} 332-3339 � f 3 � eptember 12, I986 r. Kevin P. Frazell ity Administrator ity of Mendota Heights 50 Sauth Plaza Drive endota Heights, MN 55220 James H. Lindberg Robert L. Pierce City Hall Architectural Services Design E�erience. in: is with cantinued enthusiasm for this praject that we have anized and are submitting materials which highlight the I.ifications and experience of our team for the design af r City Ha11, � ck Gilyard and I have warked together for over 20 j ars....beginning in 1964 at the Cerny Assaciates unti2 we th left that firm•in the early 1970s to pursue our owri erations. Together during that period and since rejoining rces in I982, we have worked as a team on a wide variety of allenges.»..we are confident from the responsa o� elients d peers that we have provided a series of superior designs. . Dave Kelly, project architect for the Mendata Heights ject team joined Lindberg Pierce in early 1985 and is a key er of our arganization. He brings an impressive record af erience with a particular focus on municipal projects. � attached material prafiles the specific individual and red e�erience of aur team. We encourage you to visit our jects and talk with our clients to assure yaurself of��our itment ta service and to the develapment of designs which specificaily tailored to client criteria and make a nifi.cant contribution to the community at large. ope this matrial addresses the issues of your evaluation cess. Please ca21 with any questions or requests for� Iification that wauld be of assistance. � Tn nx yau. Rab rt L. Pierce ierce ilyard R GROVE HEIGHTS CIL CHAMBER REMODELING ....................1985-19$6 ect Scope Redesign af council staffJpress/area to achieve appropriate sight lines Develapment o� presentation walls/camponents/colors/ furnishes ect Director ..............................R. Pierce ect Designer .............................R. Giiyard MIN EAPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY AND INF0�2MATION SYSTEM Pro'ect Scope Systemwide graphics program . Development o� camprehensive signing system, 'user manual', prototype installation Walker Libra•ryfMain Library Business Departmen� Entry and Checkout Pro ect Director.......» .....................R. Pierce Pro ect Designer ............................R. Gilyard ST.ILOUIS PARK COUNCIL CHAMBERS ...................1983 ect Pra ect Pro� ect Scope Reconfiguratian o� Council Chamber, devalopment of new council table, presentation area; incorporation of cable TV production capacity. Color/furnishings/graphics Director ..............................R. Pierce Da�igner .............................R. Gilyard 1 . Representative Projects e R. R. (Pierce Gzlyard KLYN CENTER CITY HALL CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX ...........................197I ect Scope 25,Odd s.f. City Hall 39,OOQ s.f. Recreational Center ect Director ..............................R. Pierce ect Designer .............................R. Gilyard CENTER CITY HALL ..........................1985 Prob ect Scope Interiors Refurbishing Palice Department Interiars Pra'ect Director ..............................R. Pierce Pro'ect Designer .............................R. Gilyard NEWIBRIGHTON CITY HALL & POLICE EXP�NSION REMC?DELTNG .........................1982-1986 � Pro ect Scope Programming design of 10,000 s.f. additianf20,000 s.f. facility Project Director ..............................R. Pierce Project Designer .............................R. Gilyard Represeniative Projects • ierce ilyard HON YWELL DSD, EDINA, MN OFF CEIRESEARCHICONFERENCE FACILITY...........1984-3986 • • C Praj � Proj :ct Scape Master planning o� 20 acre Edina szte, 200,004 s.�. additian to existing facil.ityjOffice, conference, research facility including restaurantjcafeteria, interior parking :ct Designer............� .................R. Gilyard :ct Architect .............-................,D. Kelly � 1 I f 4 I Representative Prajects R. aILYARD - OTHER NOTABLE PROSECTS Citiscape TownhamesjBaton Development Rive place areajSt. Anthony East Minneapolis Minn apolis Community Develapment AgencyjDeszgn Camp titian Scop . 60 townhomes .... ..................$4.5 million Proj ct Planning and Design Regi nal Medical Education Center Trai ingJCanference Facility Additian Vete ans Administratian, Ft. Snelling, MN Scap : Addition to turn-of-the-century 'campus' a� buil ings. Flexible conierence seminar facility for up to 1 0 ar a cambination of.�small graups. Cene Corporate Headquarters Irive GroVe Heights, MN Scope: 360,000 s.f .... ....................$16,000,000 Proje t Programming Design Site aster Planning and Building Design North Central Companies Corpo ate Headquarters Town quare, St. Paul, MN Scope 40,000 s.f. Top t ree floors/�xford Tower Facil ty programmingjspace planning Inter'ors/Office Systems Evaluation Colar /FurnishingsJAppaintm�nts Proje t Programming and Design City a�f DuZuthjCity Graphics and Street Signzng Program j Duluth�International Air Terminal Jesuit� Retreat HausejDemontreville, MN @ � i4 ! { Representative Prajects Mx . K City Direc Deve (Form Hopki 803 F New B (612} vin Locke f New Brighton or of Community opment r Executive Directar s Mairr Street Program} fth Avenue N.W. ighton, MN 55112 633-1537 Mr. G rald Kimball Dzrac or af the Physical Plan ing Divisian City f Duluth 409 C'ty Hall Dulut , MN 55802 (218) 723-3328 Mr. Ch VA Med Engine 54th S Minnea (632) rlie Kiefer cal Center ring Dept. 138 . & 48th Ave. olis, MN 55417 25-676? ext 6Q85 Mrs. Mary Van Evera � (Previous Po�itions: � Director of Duluth Downtown Development Corporation Chairman/Library Boarii/Building committee} � DirectorfWorld Press Institute 1700 Lakeview Driva Duluth, MN 55803 (2I8} 724-0133 i Mr. Tom Holt � Senior Vice President� North Central. Companies North Central Life Towe 445 Minnesota Street � P. O. Bax 43134 St. Paui, MN 55164 � (612) 227-800Q 1 Mr. Bil1. Moore Plant Engineering Supervisar Haneywell, Inc. 5700 5metana Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 (612) 936-3094 � j References Mr. Ci.t 630 561 �erald Splinter Manager Shingle Creek Pkwy. :lyn Center, MN 55430 440 Mr. enry Sznda City Manager 803 ifth Avenue N.W. New rightan, MN 55II2 633- 533 Ms. lizabe�th Fugazzi Chie , Gentral Library 300 icallet MaII Mi.nn apolis r MN 55401 372- 500 Mrs. Sharan Klumpp Assi tant to City Manager 5005 Minnetanka Blvd. St. ouis Park, MN 55416 920- 004 ext. 12 City af Znver Grove Hezahts Mr. Robert Schaefer City Administrator 8150 Barbara Avenue Inver Grave Heights, MN 550'75 45?-2111 Honeywell, Inc. Mr. William Moore Plant Engineering Supvr. 5700 Smetana Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 936-3094 MetropoZitan Transit Commission Mr. John C. Eaves, Jr. Manager, Capital Tmprove- ments and Construction 515 North Cleveland Ave. 8t, Paul, MN 55114 642-26z3 Northwestern Bell Mr. Jerry Krieger 70 West 4 Street, Room I-C St. Paul, MN 55102 221-4940 �,- ,w�,,.. ...� ....... . _ , _ - : _ - - , � � _ . , , . - - �� '. _ . � � ` . . , �"',.,�,.,-� �-- . �(„-.--f- x. - ;�� _ � � :,`,� .. � . � -�� „, - , . . � , � . � . . . ' �- � ; '� ' , ..��.—, . ��',.. . ` . ' I C Y ,� r. . ... . . . ... .. . .. � ..,.s.. � .� . .. �y.�� n : n .e' , „ �: � y y i . � L. � , . , � yF"'. ., . �� _ . �.. � . . _. - . . : �.. , .. . . .� � . . . :�. . . . , � V � .. . _ �` ;; , ' . . . . . ., .,.... .. :.. ..:�. . � . . �.. � ��. � . . . .;. . . . . : . - . . . . :. . .. .• .,. . _ �� :� . . � �w.'. ., .� .. .. . � , . � . . . . . , . � ' �.. t...� . , . . . � , . . ,. .. _ , � .> �+ '.- _ , . . }r .� ,. � . . . . � � - .. " . > . . � 1 i . . - Y " — ' � . . � � � .tA' . , ^ ' ^ ' , . � . .. , e . r. ' , . . � ..� � . � .. -. . .� . � . . �. , . � ; �„LL i; ` . � �< � _ . . . . . ' � � t." 3 � ' � � ,x k 'AJ �4 L,��a. , . . , . �� ' . �� j-: : .., -.. �, �. _ ,� �� "` . : . � � .. . , . ... � _ .. ,. . .� �� # * �� .. � .. . .. � e . . . r ` :f� Y` , , a 5 . iy" � x r t ..�� -=.x� , � -� '�.�� _ _ � ��t _ � , .r �� _ ,_ �` 8 !P .. , .,_ . a. - ,.' :�� . . _ .�- . . ,: �., . , « � . � , _.: ... �, � $ d�� ' � .�� . ' ' ' � i*_. . , h ., a „, . �_: . . . �. .> . .,� , �, ,. _ , - � � N i . . r� . . .,:.'- . . w ., . : ..� .,, _, � �- . t � „ .. � . � . . , ' ;� .: . . ..; ,-' . t ,. . .;.s. . ..... , , s „ � '. � r , �,�, � - . , - . .� ! �� s �r t� ._ . ' . . , s. �.. . � � � t . - . _ �. '. , - . �'�,` � . _ . z� . � � �-� :r�,� ,d'i4 -. . . , , , r ., - . , . � . w..`�S( � � , . , . � � �, .,: ; . �� . - , � • � .�� ,, . ` w e ., � s„ .�� . . , �, � � , y�. • � ' < ,, �t� �,� � � - � �,y,. ` : � �� „) �o � �" r �s � � r � � � „ � .. ,I . . �i� � �/ p� ' r. d � - ' " . . ��T . . � � }. - . _.. ,�f '. n�� t i.r r�J� R - fi x._ , , �' !c. f py. � _ . ,{'�7i' . � �'9 t � � c�f � � � ' ,% ��T' . .�� i�"� . . *LF• y�, � . , M L (YY ' ' . . ! ' � ,� e�_ fi. ! ' �',�.�p� � �, x ;., �1tl � R, , �I � _ � .. . '; . � , ` . � ti,, � �r*t: ,� Q ,_ ,�� r,r �� F�.: �«k (�� . � y� _ �h . a�* ' '- ..� ` . � �� , - . �� x�. . � . . .e � -'I .. ' � �.. A. . !.,ar �� " . , i.��.G%� �o' _ - '. ...Qii`R"'f'',`�, x,;. ,�, ,s' i��`; ` .,.4'17! � ., o�� _�� r�°�'� } �+,a��; +�. � TQs' t .. ,o' ' ` �cC �j4�F,:. � ri . "� �'7,'; o `�..� �_„`.-�'` ' ! �i',ts„f�F , �.'I` ,`" :r� e �' " . a rYl� 2,'� k � +��k F u �`.:� �' �a� , t ' . � . e �?�_ 7`, a,.,x�y`:. C! :,�C "�+�e' ; • � „ �� ;�?"" ��tj,n,� r . +��,, s� �i ,, �!4 � �+��,(�� -2i., i t �u k x � . � . �,` ,�'' �.�i� , �'. �d, . 'S�7 '",�i _ . . �,j�a!��a� i�� i¢: �ii� r i" , s� ', y�j � � . : * � �� "$� r�� t,�i;��..'C, w �� ,� ? •e � an.� �° � y"' Q ��'yyt : y��,a,�'�� a,J,,��}'° ,'�,�,'j�• ,• >7�� : - � "�'' � " � �., _1 } � �n • 4 r� - �� . . . . . .. �� rQ}r� ��t' ' •i�n ry.,Sp/•.�[��f�. �r ��)�,��• r �l�.y,��' Q, / ' ,hld � #�� '� ` * r ll I�{y, . � , .. [ y %� 7i`T��x.,y " �t.�4Y`t�, ;Q � � � ,�?`�j tt r�t �R. �.w�.i.�fi� �^�' ` r � `�qY [ �r F T' �a' `�'a+ l'�� tr« r ' rx�,�'�l.T 3 �� C Q . T_ } ��' . } �i' � �«7�� i} , i .� ��'�: . " - .' ' -� ! • , � e .�. t � . ?'1 �. � w �9 . liifl ��` � �::1 7aT. r� ✓ �� ,r r �,! � �. a ` k! 'k ,� �'� ��'.,,� � • ,�e�' ,,,,,A'' i�fi��i' �a� r �;.`� , - -� - :'+b'j'.tip�:,;�T �, �-•?'� 0 ��, � �,��il(��- .s�, �� ,.aR��,. � r��P�� t¢) . . � . �.�„,i � '., e.. t � � t �t �.i � � � ` a � �� -1 ��d�7�i��•'k' *t: • e a ��'� ``ir` -�` ,+ �,�` �'ia 3� 1 tf ` ��et � '�`'u d �:' . �.,..r ��C 55, � ^.!. LN �`� tr �a. :7e�� . . .i � >� a� '4 n � . �.... ` a • e � rr Sf � t " f ' �i -y� t ��2� � �y'�'S.� 7 }',�. '" -`� #"' F.� � .,rq� , � f11� ��, ,°�r �t , F,r� � 1,� r�`.' ` , �',��' ..� �yif�` � '� '4{ye 'l"�� ,�e ,(i�"� 3 ?_• �f�'bf 1' f( . ,.�� "'� �"='�=y� !�.'a .;iu'� ' m1-4. G, . . � > -e �.,�� - ° �-'r� ' �� ' � " � - � . � ' 7 . , � w" . ��' ` ' . ,�b,�+s��y��. A.�-,YA`� 'i ;� � a k-; » , � :. � .. ��.�� `�,; ,,��,�� .,� . , , �,� ; ,� , ,� - t ."I�yM ., �� .� O • ' � � f .z .+l.w.e, � . Y � , , , yp " � ,� �„ J'�:3n��. Sttr. �_ �U� � -� � � t . �r �� i1 -� . .. n ��( �� . � (} , •. " t �+,r,L y� .. +w . , , F ,`. : ' ..... ��).. 'i' 1��+. '3��r ^ �h�'. •� �� `.�� j '�', � • . ' � ��"�y ! .f s � ° - � :�� ' �P= � ° � �'`T iTD� �^'+ °�r Q k'� a s , . ,y ; .. ,� � ,� . � �r;�, '3 .. � x � o � j ;� ti.h � n ��1 _ � a qI�r��[ �' �JOTj� �y/'� {_ . L _t . � �`.. ' ' / y ... �•�#, • . . • ' �� `uw. L � �..'4.s � � � � 1 � . ��' _.��'1 !a� G� p �� n . " . . • . . . _ . e �.} SE 2, 1986 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FRO : Kevin D. �Z�� City Adm'n s or CT: Add-on Agenda for September 2 Additional information is submitted for four items o age da, as indicated below, and an additional item, 9.i. re ested for addition. At the request of the Iiayber Dev Gro p, Item 9.a., Mendakota Mall, is recommended for tab the September 16 meeting.� 30 �Agenda Adoption - the s lopment ing to It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda withlthe tab ing of item 8.a. Mendakota Mall Development, to September 16, and the addition of Item 9.i. - City Administrator Request for Per ormance Review. � 8.a.1 Yorkton Bid Award Please see attached memorandum from Public Works D acc mpanying resolution. 8_f .� 1987 Budget Hearing 9.e. Eng� 9.h. Olur foot strc more ava i Please see attached memorandum from City Treasurer. Spanjers Feasibility Report Please see attached memorandum and resolution from C: eer. Purchase of Aerator for Park Dept• Attached is a memorandum from Public Works Superintez requesting an additional $600 to purchase a 6 foot, wide aerator machine. Public Works Director Danielsc gly concur with this recommendation, as it would leac efficient use of our manpower. The extra $600 will x able from savings on tennis court resurfacing which � tor and _ty dent Tom versus 3 n and I to much as � CITY �F MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO accarnplished earlier this year. 9.i. CitY Administrator Request for Annua3 Perfarmance Review September has traditionally been the time of year when Council and T sit down to disctzss my performance as City Administrator over the past year. T am requesting that we da so again this September, and am sugge�ting that we meet priar to the Council meeting of September 16, at ei�.her 6:30 or 7:00 P.M. As in the past, I would be happy to provide Council with a list af questions to pique yaur thinking, and send it out with this week's Friday News. Conversely, Council is welcome to devise its own evaluation approach. In the past, the evaluation� have been fairl.y informal. As a reminder, we da not normaZly discuss salary and benefits during thi� evaluation. ACTION REQUIRED. If Council concurs with this request, it should adjaurn tonight's meeting to an evaluation session at an appropriate time on September 16. Council can alsa give any directive� as to how it would like the evaluation carried out. KDF:madlr attachments � �: T0: DI Br Ri t fa CITY OF N�NDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO { � Mayor, City Council and City�d� i��ator .�" _ . James E. Danielson Public Works Director September 2, � JECT: Sewers, Water, Streets & Lift Station Yorkton Centre Pointe South Job No. 8422, Improvement No. 84, Project No. 4 CUSSION: Bids were opened this morning f or the Yorkton project. There ders so we were expecting lots of bids, we received only three. wn & Cris, Inc. hard Knutson, Inc. etti & Sons, Inc. ineer's Estimate Estimate Yorkton Part $647,710 Mn/DOT Part 115,700 Actual $663,295.90 154,282.75 •:. re 13 p lan $ I 817 , 578 . 65 837,751.30 1,029,370.00 Although the bid is 6-7 percent higher than estimated, the cos sonable. 763,410.00 are The low bidder, Brown & Cris, Inc., is the contractor who we just awarded Evergreen Knolls 2nd Addition project to. They are just beginning work on t project so we don't have a lot of experience with them yet, however I had led ref erences on them for the Evergreen project and those referinces were all orable. This project also involves a cooperative agreement with Mn/DO ha e agreed to fund the frontage road construction. Mn/DOT would pr paration of this cooperative agreement until the plans and spec do e and we just recently finished them. The cooperative agreemen ta es 2-3 months, therefore there is still approximately 2 months ag eement is completed. dr Cr ti We are also waiting for a Corps of Engineers permit to allow age way through the site. ION: because they t begin the ications were preparation ft before the lling of a Staff recommends that the project be awarded to the low bidder�, Brown & , Inc., for their low bid of $817,578.65, subject to approval o�f a coopera- agreement being finalized with Mn/DOT for the frontage road work and subject .. to receipt of a Corps of Engineers �ill permit. (They couZd begin an the Yorkton utility work immediately after the Corps permit and hold off on the Mn/AOT work unta.l the cooperative agreement is received.} ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to impl.emenC the sta£f recommendation �hey shou7.d pass a motian adopting Resolution No. $6- , l2ESQLi1TIQN ACCEPTING BZDS AND AWARDTNG CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREET AND LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE YORKTON CENTRE PflINTE SOtiTIi (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PROJECT N0. 4) City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- RESOLUTION ACCEFTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRU F SANITARY SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER, STREET AND LIFT STATIQN TO SERVE YORKTON CENTRE POINTE SQUTH (IMPROVEMENT N0. 84, PRO N0. 4) WHE EAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed cons;truction of san'tary sewer, water, storm sewer, street and lift station improvements to serve Yor ton Centre Pointe South and adjacent areas {which improvemerits have her tofore been known and designated as Impravement No. 84, Project �No. 4), bids wer rece3ved, opened and tabul.ated according to law and the foZlawi'ng bids were rec ived complying with said advertisement: � � : 1 1 �i• Bro�wn and Cris, Inc. Pri�or Lake, Minnesota ard Knutsan, Inc. sville, MN La�etti & Sons, Inc. Hu o, MN A.MOUNT OF BID $817,578.65 837,751.30 1,029,370.00 S, the City Engineer recommended that Che low bid submitted and Cris, Inc. of Prior Lake, Minnesota, be accepted. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by Che City Council of the City of ota Iieights, Minnesota, as follows: � 1. Tha� the bid of Brown and Cris, Inc. of Frior Lake, Min submitted for the construction af the above described zmpro and the same is hereby accepted. 2. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directe execute and deliver any and all contracts and documen�Gs neces� consummate the awarding of said bids. Ad�gted by the City Caunci.l of the City af Mendota Heights tfiis 2nd Se �.ember, 1986. CITY COLiNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. AT'ICEST: en M. Swanson, City C1erk kwoad, Mayor ta nts be 3 to �ry to j day of i L+ SE 2, 1986 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � To: Mayor, City Council, and City A✓�i�t�ator . Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer . 1987 Proposed Budget HISTORY: � A special meeting of the Council with the City depariment hea s brought about the following suggestions: 1. That the City begin to lean away from heavy dependence on Equipment Certificates financing. As a result, we sugest that all small items be removed from Equipment Certificates and placed in the operating budget. This results in a suggested tax increase of about $33,630, or .34 raw mills. � 2. That a special Interstructure Reserve Fund as pe'rmitted by new legislation be established for future improvement projects. A levy of about $50,000 to establish this fund would increase the raw levy 1/2 mill. I The effect of these two revisions would result in a of 4.80 mills, still .57 mills below that for 1986. ACT�ON REQUIRED: LES w levy Instruct staff to incorporate proposed changes in final et document and levy resolution. � :madlr res Cur wit par on City of Mendota Heights Dakota Caunty, Minnesota RESOLOTION N0. 86- uSOLUiION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPR4VEMENT AND PREPARATION QF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS AND WATERMAINS TO SERVE VALLEY CURVE ESTATES (IMPROVEMENT NQ. $6, PROJECT N0.�5) 2EAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with �ect ta the prposed canstruction of the folZowing zmpravements to4serve VaZley ve Es�ates and ajacent areas to-wit: The construction of an extensian to the City's sanitary sewer system, in- cludzng appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisit'ion of ease- men�.s, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets anc3 easements in the area hereinaf�.er more particularly described. � The construc�ion af an extensiqn to the City's water distribut�.on system including appurtenances and zncidentals thereta, and the acquis�tior� of easemen�s, and the recanstruction where necessary of streets an�d easements in �he area hereinafter more particularly described. 2EAS, the area proposed Lo be assessed for said improvements is s�itua�ed zin the City of Mendota Heights in Dakata CounCy, Minnesota and a.s more �icularly described as fallows: Va11ey Curve Estates 2EAS, in said report sai.d CiCy Engineer reported that the proposed improve- :.s and construction thereof were feasible and desireable and further reported :he proposed cost af said improvements. �- THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBX R�SOLVED by the City Counczl of the �lty� of Mendota ;hts, Minnesota as �ollows: 1. Tha� the report of said Ci�y Engineer be and is hereby rece;ived. 2. That it is advisable, £easible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct Phase I of the above described impro� men�s, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. 3. Thai the City Engineer be and he is hereby au�hori�ed and prepare plans and specifications far said improvement. 4. That said improvement sha11. hereafter be known and designa provement No. 86, Project No. 5. cted to as Im- rted by the City Cauncil of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd�day of :ember, I9$6. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDQTA IiETGHTS By Robert e Kathleen M. 5wanson Gi v Clerk _ . . Lockwood, Mayor . CITY OF MENDOTA F-IEIGHTS MEMQ August 29, 1 � Mayor, City Caunci2 and City Ad��z��a�tor 1: Tom Olund Public Works Superintendent DIS(CUSSI4i3: Included in �he 1986 budget, there was $1,500 allocated for a g'round ae ator. The aerator that was budgeted for was a small 3 foot wide machine, wh t we would like is a bigger 6 foat wide machine for $2,100. This machine is eavier and wider, and would do a better job �aster than the oth�r ma hine. Aerating remaves soil and thatch and helps �he turf more readil'y absorb ma iture and fertilizer, making for a healthier an.d thicker turf. Qur parks ha e never been aerated and we would incorporate �his into our regul.ar ma'ntenance program. � TION: Staff recommends that we exceed the budget by $600 and purchase the r machine for $2,100. � ON RE9UIRED: If Council wishes to implement the staff recammendation they s s a motion authorizing a purchase order ta be pregareci �or R.L. Company in the amaunt of $2,100. � ASSESSMFNT PERIOD Sanitary Sewers - 19 years Watermains - 19 years Storm Sewers - 19 years Streets - 10 years CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT ROLL COPPERFIELD ADDITION PHASE I IMPROVENIENT N0. 85-4 JOB N0. 8517 ADOPTED: ASSESSMENT RATES Sanitary Sewers $1,643.07 Watermain $1,609.87 Streets $3,261.06 Storm Sewer $930.75 Sanitary Service $496.54 Water Service $639.56 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER STORM STREETS TOTAL N0. DESCRIPTION - — - -- NO.-- NO.--SEWERS---SERVICES__�MAINS _� SERVICES SEWERS 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 1 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 010-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 2 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 020-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 � 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 3 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 030-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 4 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 040-01 6440 Flyin g Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Pr airie, MN 55344 . 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 5 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 OSO-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 060-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I ' 6 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 070-01 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I 7 1$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 010-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I 1 2$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 irie NII�T 55344 ' , ;PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION N0. DESCRIPTION 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 020-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 030-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I --- - Eden Prairie,-MN -55344 --______. _ _ 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 040-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 050-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 060-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 070-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 080-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 090-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 100-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 110-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER . STORM STREETS TOTAL N0. N0. SEWERS SERVICES MAINS SERVICES SEWERS 2 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 3 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 6 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 7 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 , 8 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 9 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261,06 $8,580.85 10 2 $1,643.07 11 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $639.56 $930.75 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 � �PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION N0. DESCRIPTION 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 120-02 6440 Fl ying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 130-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I -- _ . --- ------ ---Eden Prairie,-MN -55344 - ---- 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 140-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 150-02 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • . 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 160-02 6440 Fl ying Cloud Drive � Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 010-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 020-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 030-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 040-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 050-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 060-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER N0. N0. SEWERS SERVICES MAINS SERVICES 12 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 STORM STREErS SEWERS TOTAL $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 13 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 14 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 15 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 16 2 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 1 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 2 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 3 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 S 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 6 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 �930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 - � �P9RCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION N0. � DESCRIPTION 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 070-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Pr airie, MN 55344 LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER N0. N0. SEWERS SERVICES MAINS SERVICES 7 3 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 8 3$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 080-03 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I -- - -- - " Eden Prairie,-MN- 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 1 4$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 010-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 � 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 020-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Pr airie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation � Copperfield Subdivision 030-04 6440 Fl ying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Pr airie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 040-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Pr airie, MN 55344 " , 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision OSO-04 6440 F1 ying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 060-04 6440 F1 ying Cloud Drive Phase I .Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 070-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 080-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 090-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 STORM STREETS SEWERS TOTAL $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 2 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580..85 3 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 6 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 7 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 8 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 9 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 ,:FARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER N0. DESCRIPTION N0. N0. SEWERS SERVICES MAINS SERVICES 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 10 4$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 100-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I , Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 11 110-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I � -- � Eden Prairie, MN 55344- ------ - - - - � --- -- - 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 12 120-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 13 130-04 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 1 010-OS 6440 F1 ying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 2 020-05 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 3 ` 030-OS 6440 Flyi.ng Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 4 040-05 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 010-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I ' 1 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 2 020-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 STORM STREETS SEWERS TOTAL $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 4 $1,643.07 $496.54 '$1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 5 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 6 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 6 $1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 PARCEL REPUTED OWNER AND SUBDIVISION LOT BLK SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATER STORM STREETS TOTAL N0. DESCRIPTION N0. N0. SEWERS SERVICES MAINS SERVICES SEWERS 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 3 6$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 030-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I . Eden Prairie, MN 55344 � �--- -- 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 4 6$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 040=06 -- 6440 Fl in Cloud Drive�---- — Phase -I -- - -- - --- - - - - - - -- ----- --- Y g ----- ---- -- - -- --- - - - ------- �-- - -- --- ----- - Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 5 6$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 050-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I � Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 6 6$1,643.07 $496.54 �1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 060-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I Eden Prairie, MN 55344 27-18300- Tandem Corporation Copperfield Subdivision 7 6$1,643.07 $496.54 $1,609.87 $639.56 $930.75 $3,261.06 $8,580.85 070-06 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Phase I