1986-07-011.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
JULY l, 1986 - 7:30 �.M.
� Call to Order. � %��71
IRoll Call. � �
� ����
Agenda Adoption. — �.
I
Approval of May 20 Minutes. —� ;
Consent Calendar: — j� I
i
a. Acknowledgement of Code Enforcement Report for June.
b. Acknowledgement of June 24 Planning Commission �
Minutes.
c. Approval of Time Change of Planning Commission
Meetings.
�. A�pr�v�of the List of Contractor Licenses.
��x' °(I i
End of Consent Calendar. ;
I Public Comments. �- � �
Introductions.
a. Fran Zeuli represent�g Continental
Bid Award and Heari`ngs:
Cablevision. `
�
i
a. Bid Awa d or Meth ist Church Utilities. (Res., 86-
4a�. — (9- �' �9`l, I7�o7 - ,
b. Informal Hearing for NE Streets (continued from 6- �/f
16v es�?I� uti� ns No. 86-49 nd 86-50) . � ��. , hU
SG - �t 9,J� ��R�.l�l�,�- � %� `s� - �7�'�l �,�✓, Y�,�:,� i��.,,��,-.� �' ;,�e 0
c. Case No. 86-11, Bream Homes, Continued Hearing. � 7�`
(Reso ution No. 86- �1)•� -8� 0 P.M � �
.i�y. �—�d: 3'� 7��� CvP Cr°�� a�;3�,,s!' 3/• �'..��.
d. C a s e N o. 8 6- 1 7, K n d l l m a i e r, C o n i t i o n a l U s e P e r m i t. �
8 : 4 5 P . M . -- L �° o�%�� S� � � rr--�-�..� • �'�tc � .
��y�" �. ' . �
e. Case N6. 86-10, Condor Corporation, Rezoning, CUP
for PUD, and ubd'�}�ion. (Resolution NO. 86-52).
9: 0 0 P. M. % , jW/h�A �,,,��' I
�� ' " `" ' �G.� G� �X � x� � "}- G `�^w^u� Y`L .
_ ���� U�
�� ��"-z � c��.,,,.,,�)
� �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
, i �
9. Unfinished and New Business:
a. Receipt or� Hall Committee Recommendation.
b. Ca��� No. 86-14, Dougherty, Minor CUP. - � ���-
/�2:�r
Case No. 86-15, Johnson, Variance. —�
'��� ��
��
Case No. 86-2 , Rabanus, Variance �- �$'�-�� �8
Plans a�ecs for Evergreen nolls Addit'on.
(Resolution No. 86-53) . �- -�2`" J,,"'� � � ���,%
�
Copperfield Feasibility �udy nd EAW=�"'Y'�-Resol� tions
No. 86-54 an 86-55) . �� . r-�.� �►���
� ��w' ��' . �
Improvemen Bond F n�n . (Resolution No. 86-
56) . �- C'/-`�"� �
� %K�
Fi�l I spection �� - 606 Valley Lane. -- ��� �
.�. � ,/ /,�
ise to Counci Commen ����� /T " ��_ Q�
�r�
'�-.- ��� /3 ` o� ,�.,,.a"-�..- � �
Ll Comments. _
�
-n. - Ja :��
-�-o � %� )� � ��.:, �Q��� � � "".�"`
, ��"`
_ /��'�
G�.�- � �2� "
�
0
�
items,
agenda.
Agenda
To: Mayor and City
Council
From: Kevin Frazell, City
Administrator
Re: Add-On Agenda �for
July 1, 19�8 6
(<
�
5.f., and 9.� , are recommended for addition to
Additional information is submitted for It�em
Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda with the
addition of Item 5.f., List of Claims, and Item 9.h�.,
Resolution Requesting State Participation in Lake LeMay
Storm Sewer Improvements.
a. List of Claims
See attached. .
�_r b. Northend Street Improvements
Attached are the two resolutions, one holding the State
harmless for granting the speed varaince, and the second
awarding the bid, that Council should pass if if wishes
to proceed with the project. , �
3 �
�'. Resolution Requesting State Participation in Lake
Storm Sewer Improvements
See attached memo from the Public Works Director.
uVF/� 1V Clllllllll ✓GtJL JV 1\LLl3L1lU�G
.7uly 1, 986 CLAIPiS LIST � 20-Police � 60-Utilities
70-Parks
CHECK �� ER 30-Fire � SO-Planning
40-CEO j 90-Animal Contro]
„ MOUNT _.__^._^____. V.ENDOR__._. _�� I.T�M D�SCR7PT.ION_�_ A�CQU_NT I�..Q.. .I.N1
13.93 APACHE HOS�/Fi�TINGS ' �1-4�05-050-50
_ . 13.93---___. _ �,APACHE�._---� �....__ —�.�1�SELE,ITS�.N.CS __.T U1-4_�0_S�OZD._Z2
13.93 APACHE NOSE1FiTTINGS 15-4305-Ob0-60
41.79 *✓ �
852�25 BARTON ASCHMAN ASS�IC RE PARK STUOIf ^� I; 10-4220-000-00
852.2 *•�
�
__._.____111:' -----..----GOLD S7AR PRTG REPDRTS ; U1-4?05-020-20
111.1 *✓
16.5 H R A EHPL ASS �RflG ; 01-4490-020-20
16.5 H R A E�IPL ASST FROG ; 01-4490-020-Zfl
_. .. �_..49.5 . __._��1_B.__A EMPL ASST FROS� � U�.�4.99.4.�.10-1Q
49.5 H R A EMPL ASSi FROG � a1-�490-110-IO
16.5 H R A EHPL ASS7 FR06 � �5-449�-105-15
,_ 16.5 H_R A EHPL ASST FROG � Q,5-4490-105-15
155.0 *�
�
_. ._ __6.. 5_--_._.._ A.T S�J .__ �_�. L D C A�S 9.�,- 9_21 fl�Q�tL-2 �
5.8 _ AT$T LO CALLS , 01-421�-)10-10
1Z.5 t� j
1�.D
1. 0 �'i
287.8 �
82.0
�. 4
430.2 *�
�JOs�Q */
405.fl Q *.i'
il1_oo�.�u
111�8%i�
23�37�.� */
27.0
27. 0 *✓
._._....15�9 . 8 ..._...._.___
159.8 +�
� 30D.0 .. . ---
300.0 *�
_ 20.0__�.._
20.0 �
� ... 15.9 `----
1.�.9
M A C H�YAY EASE i 05-�450-105-15
i
i
ACRO MINA COHPl1TER SPLYS � fl1-43�0-i10-10
ACRD MINA COHPIiTER PAPER � O1-h30�-�10-10
ACLO �LI..Nfi , CALCULATOR ' tL1-460_Q-1�0-��
a
i
,
f
_�nuu �ireue f 1 ri7t�T�1C ei� nu . �a�aa4n_n�n_�n
POLAR CHEU
VOMELA
�G izABeTiS C�J.Tr'
1VCS�I NC �
SO ST �AUL BEE LTIdE
ZEE MtDiCAL SUC
ZEE M�DICAl. SUC
�i/E 5/8/86 '
.
8� CAPRI.CE +
85 CAPRICE j
i
DE-CALS 2225/2b j
l
i
LMC CDNF �
�
TRN6 5115828 j
i
RPRS 2230 I
I
MEDICAL SPLYS f
MEDICAL SPLYS #
i
���..a�..o
1��gbiU�UUU�11-U
12-4610-000-OU
01-4330-440-2Q
01-�4D0-109-09
U1-4400-110-10
01-4330-440-2a
01-4?D5-050-50
01-43Q5-070-70
.�
15.95
�7'.75 *�
2�r785.b0
_27r7$5,60 ,+��-
CNECK RE�ISTER
._ _ _,.�����R .._... _ .__.
��� r��ozc��. svc
CROSSINGS iNC
105.�0 CDNiINENfAL SAFET1f
Ig 5. b 0 . *.� _ .�� ..._. _.r._�._..._ __..._._.._.._ �.._._._._,_.._.._
.m.__ ITEM_-,DESCRIPTi�N_._.----..._--_- ACCOUNT...ttt0. _IN
MEDICAL SPL�tS 15-43fl5-0 �0
PYMT 1 82-7
TRAFFIC CflNES
82-4460-807-QO
tI1- 4 3 � 0-�F6D-30
178.�J0 LA�iN f3AREERS HAY SVC OI-�t33�-325-3[�
178.00 +�
63.79 i1ILLIAM LERSS MI5C SPLYS 01-4305-q30-30
63.79 *�
110..50 SPEED ENG :IAIC PARTS/LABOR2281 171-433�-4ti0-3U
. ._ _ . _.._._._ 110 . 5 0 _ .*_� __- - --__. �____._._..__ __. _.____....� ____�_ - ---_...___ _.__, _.......___._._._
2I2.82 TNflMAS LtEZNZETTEL STAT� FIRE C{IN1� Q1-440Q-030-3{}
... ._43�05,�__--- ---- _TNtiMAS,._W.£INZ,ETT�L_,...�..__STA?E FIRE Ct1NV �, _ Ol-44i5-030�30
254.87 *l
_ 2y5.93.87 .,,.____,.._.. GUN__CLU.B�LAKE_i�Mn CITY SHARE �UI3GET .____ 1�-4226-000-OD
2 s 5 9 3 . 8 7 � --.- ___ . _ _ _ __ _. ._._ ,
35.15 ALSINS�N J�iiEL PT Q5-4305-205-15
$0.20 ALSINSON PEN CLNR �5-4620-105-�5
-�--- -- �332.55_.._.�_ ____.ALBINSONw- _—�_ RR CUFtYE � I15-�620-105-15
131.�5 ALSINS�3iV SK RDD 29-43�5-838-DO
45»65 ALBiNSON PAINT 82-4305-807-iID
--__.�_._...-�42�.35-.�_.w..� ALBZNSt�.{�.____ QUPL BILLING 85-�i3�5-829-Ofl
42.35- ALBINSON DUPL BILLTNG 95-4�Q5-822-00
54t1.3 0 *i
3.96 AT & T�IAFO SYSTEMS JUN SVC � Q1-4,210-020-20
5.�4 AT & T I�lFO SYSTEMS JUN S�{� �ti-4�1.�-QaEi-�:�
6.73 AT & T I11F0 SYSTEMS' JUN SUG �1-4210-070-70
.. 24.7�._._.._.__ ... .. A7 &�3 IiiFf3 SYSTEi�S � JUN S11C D1-�e10=070-70
6.74 AT 8 T IiVFO SYSTEMS .IUN SVC 15-4210-0�60-60
3$.89 *�
31. 78
35.23
__ . _27.79 _.
31.77
I26,57 �/
_ . .__. __._._ .....___..____�__._...___.__._.--- ___________�..._._.____ ..__.___.._.�. _��._..._
. 8&J AUTt� SPLY MISC PART� 01-4330-A40-20
B&�3 AllTt3 SP�It PARTS Q1-433(�-44(�-2D
B&J AUTO SP�Y PARTS2281 Q1-4330-460-30
Bt�J AUTG SPE.Y-.._ _._._._..__.w._�-MISC PAR3S �....�. W....._�G�'1-�3�II-49t� �0
_._ .6,`�l_. _.._ __ 8D_ �lATER,.COM_,�IS_S_ION .__. i�A�l SU� ____.._.___ _�4:�-�4.2�-3i0_-�.Q_
IAMOUNT
_ 6.4
116.38
6..4
265.5
401.16 * �
337.6�2
337.b�2 *�
65.36
73.�0
138.:�6 k�
30�.0�7
60.00
47.50
13.C?6
250.56 �ti
1,6�1.U�
905.00
1 � 564.0 0
4�370.00 *,�
22 . OIO
22.00 �
. -205.81
542.24
175.00
923.05 *�
122.�-�9
122.b9 �
429.0 o
429.00 •�
106.92
CHECK RtGISTER
VENDaR ITEM DESCRIPTICN
HD I�ATER COMMISSIOM MAY SVC
aD NATER coMMZssIo;� �a1r SUC
l3D UATER COMMTSSIGN MAY SVC
BD I�ATr R COMMiSSTt�N MAY ENGR TINE
CARLSJN TKACTORF�EQ
CITY MaTCR SUPP�Y
CITY MOTCR SUPPLY
,I
; ACCOUNT NU. If
I
' 01-4425-310-Tt
i 01-44Z5-315-3(
� 15-4425-310-61
� P5-4231-829-0t
�
PARTS SICKLE MOW�R I 01-�33D-490-5(
,
MISC PARTS
HATTERYICLA!!PS
DAVIS �LfCTRONIC SVC PASER RPR
OAVIS ELECTRO�IIC SVC BATTERIES
DAVIS ELECTRONIC SUC PAGER RPR
D�VIS ELECTRONIC SVC PAGER RPR
DCR CO�P.. JULY REN T
OCR C�RP., JllLY_ RENT
OCR CflRP. JULY RENT
FISCNERS �AS._66 _,__.____,.._HEADL_IT.E 2217
FRAZELL t�EVIN
�RAZELL. K�VIN
FRAZELL K�VIN
G�JPHER ATMLETIC
I C M A
ICMA RC
LMC CONF
-- . _.._lMC__C_ONF_
JU�Y ALLa1i
CAPS
ANNL CONF
5/2D PAYROLL ,
� �31-4330-440-2f
{ G1-4330-460-3(
�-
i
�
' ni—a��o—a50-3c
{
; Q1-4330-950-30
� C1-433�-450-3G
� Q1-�330-450-30
01-42C0-�00-10
� �I-�200-500-20
i �'�-42C 0-600-15
�
� _01-4_330-440-20
,
j .
' 01-44CU-100-10
� 01-44D0-109-09
C1-4475-110-10
i
� 01-4435-200-70
G1-4400-100-10
01-2072-000-OG
CN�"CK REGISTck
AMOU+VT �ENOGR ITE� QESCRIPTION
71.11 ICMA RC 6/20 PAYRULL
17t3.03 */
689.00 KAISF_R PAUL
689.00 */'
10.00
12.18
29.19
28.77
80�14 t�'
61 . 8 3 .�
61.83 *j
KNUTH T 0 N
KNUTH T0�!
KNUTH iDN
KNUTH TON
LANGU�A HUl�E
148.00 LELS
148. D 0 */
193,49
554.91
61+13
�309..53 �
LMCIT HP PLAN
LMCIT H� PLAN
LMCIT 3�P PLAN
9.30 LEEF BROS INC
9.35 LE�F BROS INC
9.35 LEEF E3ROS ZNC
28.00 t!
915.20 L�GIS
14.75 �OGIS
79.60 LU6IS
14.T5 LOGIS
377,30 LOGIS
57.47 LOGIS
14.70 LO�IS
1�473.77 �/
0
JUN SVC
JULY ALLOId
HI THRU 6/23
MI TNRU 6/Z3
MI THRU 6./23
LEVEL/CAULK
JULY DUES
ACCaUNT N0. I
Q1-41�4-� 1
U1-4268-150-3
C�-4415-105-1:
�1-4415-925-Oi
82-4415-807-01
SS-4415-829-01
U1-4�05-0�70-71
i�1-20T5-��0-Q(
JULY INS a1-2C74-000-01'
JULY INS 01-4131-020-2(
JULY INS 01-41�1-021-2(
JUN SYC
JUN SVC
JUN SVC
MAY SVC
MAY S UC
MAY SVC
MAY SVC
MAY SVC
MAY SYC
MAY SVC
U1-4335-310-5t
O1-43?5-310-7(
_ 15-�335-310-ot
oi—a2ia—lla—ic
03-4214-000-Qt
05-4214-105-1`
10-Q�14-000-0(
15-4214-t�60-6C
16-4214-000-0(
21-421q-000-OC
4.01 MK�1 INC CANONPROD .MAY COPIcS/JUN M7CN 01-4�00-030-30
5.50 M&N �INC CANONPR00 APR COPiES/MAIf MTCN 01-4�00-030-3C
AMUUNT
`=.
15.
11.
3.
5.
2.
700.
73.'
15�
21.
50.
36.
1...
2.
2.
1.
354.
411.
9b3.
473.
165.
764�.
63.
729.
ss�..
139..
4 � 2b8..
3
�0
'5
5
��
'0
�5
�0
i
,0
'S
0
��
�5
i4 +�.
5
ip
0
!0
'0
�0
�5
�0
�5
i5 * /
�333. 3-
37�670.. 1
2 � 083. 3-
34,753. 5 ��
150. 0
150. 0 * /
20.
128.
149.
10.
6.
3.
3.
Ja
:0
�0
�0
FO
.0
CiiECK REG'IST� R
VENDCR
M&i� .iNC CANONPROD
MKW iNC CAMONPROD
Mi�� INC CANONPRO�
M�� INC CAN�Ni'ROD
M&�1 INC CANONPROD
Mi�u INC LANONPROD
M&.W iNC CANONPR00
MlS�i IIVC CANOfVPROD
M&�i I NC CANONPR Ot7
MK1� .INC CANUNPR�D
Ml�W INC CANONPROa
MK�i INC CtINUMPRDD
M$u INC C,�N+ONPRDD
Ml�1i INC CAMONPRUO
M$�I INC CAN�DNPRUU
ME�C�NTERS HP
MEDCE�iTERS tiP
MEDCr NTERS HP
hIEDCENTEFS HP
MEDCENTERS HP
MEDCENTERS HP
MEDCENfEFS HP
MEDCENTERS HP
M�DCENTEFS HP
METRO WASTE CDNTR4L
METRO �IASTE CO�tiTROL
METRO �IAST� CDNTROL
MN DEPT FUF3LICSA�ETY
MINN FTRE INC
MINN �IRE INC
MINN MUTUAL IIFE
MINN MUTI;AL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUT�AL LI�E
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
ITEM OESCRIPTIOR ,
�
APR CDPIES/NAY MTCN�
MAY COPIcS/JUNMTCi� �
MAY CDPIES/JUN NTCN;
APR COPIES/l�AY MTCAI !
SHpG CHG TOncR I
APR Ct�PItS/MA1f MTCN �
MAY COP.I�S/�Uh MTCN� �
MAY CUPIES/JUN MTCN'
APR C�3PIES/MAY MTCN I
APR COPIES/MAY f1TCN �I
MAY COPTES/JUh PYMT'
MAY COPIES/JUN �1TCN �
APR COPIES/NAY MTCN�
APR COPIESlf4A'� RTCN;
MAY CUPItS/JUr T!TCNj
�
JULY PREM
JULY PREH i
JULY PRcP'I '
JUIY PR,EM -- _- _t
JULY PREN '
�
JULY PREM ,
JULY PREM
JULIf PRtM ,
JULY PREM �
r
�
�
JULY INSTALL �
JULY INSTALL I
JULY INSTALL �
- - --� -
�
2ND +�TR CD1�N CHG
EQ �ITCN
EO MTCN
JUL IWS
JULINS
JUL I NS
JUL I NS
JUL I NS
ACCCU�T N0. II
01-4�00-040-41
a1-4?GO-040-4!
�Ji-4' 0 0-JE30-81
ei-��ca-o�o-R�
J1-43G0-110-IC
�1-4300-110-II
�1-4300-110-1i
01-4�D5-020-21
01-4:D5-020-2(
Q5-4'JO-105-1`.
05-4�00-105-1'
10-4�Q0-000-01
10-43G�-U00-01
i5-4��00-Ub0-61
15-4:OC-Ob0-61
D1-2074-000-0(
QI-41�1-020-21
01-4231-021-2(
Q1-4131-040-4(
U1-41?1-050-5t
ei-ai�i-o�o-��
G'l-4131-110-1f
c�-ai�i-ios-2�
15-41�1-060-b(
14-3575-000-Ot
15-4449-060-6(
17-3575-000-D(
01-4330-450-2C
�1-43?0-460-:3(
G1-433i1-460-31
D1-2074-D00-0(
01-4131-020-2t
�1-4131-021-2t
01-41�1-0'TO-7(
01-4231-110-1(
oMpUMT
7 .70
1.70
32.50 *,
173.89
55.78
97.�9
Z84.50
116.92
55�.90
54.60
839.68 *�
180.00
1-55.Oa
3 35 . Q 0 */
8.40
8.40 +►�
397.07
239.89
b3b.96 *,
55.88
102.52
165.90
324.30 t�
60.00
b0.00
60.00
6Q.00
60.00
60.00
�6U.00 *�
40.00
40.OD +/
CHcCK REGIST�R
VE:NDaR
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
MINN MUTUAL LIFE
NORTHN�STERN $tLL
NORTN:yEST.ERN SELL
NORTHIJEST�RN BELL
NORTHWEST�RN E3ELL
NORTHN�STERN BELL
N(iRTH�tESTFRN BELL
NORTH1iEST�RN t3ELL
OAK CR�S7 KENNcLS
OAK CREST KEN�IELS
OXY6ElV SERNIC� Ca
PINE tiENC PAVING INC
PINE BENC PAVIN� INC
Si�T OFFIC;� PROOUCTS
S8T OFFIt�.. PRUDUCTS
S&7 OFF I CE PRODliCTS
SA'TELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLI7E INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDUST INC
SATELLITE INDU�T INC
SATELLITE IVUUST TiUC
SATELL.ITE INDUST INC
SELAND�R DUANE C
ITEM QESCRIPTION
JUL :i NS
JUL INS
JUN SVC
JUN SVC
JUN SbC
JUN SUC
JUN SVC
JUN SVC
JUN SUC
JUI� SUC
JUN SVC
DEMURRA6E 5175
i�EAR MIX
WcAR MIX
CUMI'UTER SPLYS
COHPUTER SPLYS
COMPUTER SPLYS
RENT JI7/17 fH PA�K
REt�T 7/17 VALIEY
RENT 711? ROG LAKE
RENT 7/17 MARIE
RENT 7/17 iYY
RENT 7/17 WEA`T
JULY ALLOW
1�079.50 SHAUGHNESSY L E JR JUN SUC
ACCOUNT N0. �I
�5-41 �1-1' �1�
15-41�1-0 �
Q1-4210-D2D-27
D1-4e"10-OSU-Sa
01-4�10-D70-�3
01-4210-1.10-1�
02-4210-315-3�
QS-4210-105-1�
1 S-4 210-Q60-6Z
01-4221-800-9t
01-4225-800-9E
G1-4305-030-3(
Q1-4�422-Q50-50
01-4422-O50-SG
ei-43ao-�io-�a
01-43�JD-i10-10
01-4300-110-10
Ul-42C0-610=70
U1-4200-510�T0
�1-4ZC0-b10-7i7
U1-4200-610-70
U1-4�00-6.10-7�
01-42�0-61D-7C
01-4415-200-7G
oi-a22o-i�2-io
AMOUNT
• 25a,
72,
9 3 .,
773.
192
230:
153,
2, 849.�
36
65
45
30
C5
95
10
,3b *�
344 09
344. D 9 *i
12 8'7
12 87 �,
i� eo
, 94 40
111 4 0 */
6t3 28
34 14
23 78
23 78
11 32
161 30 *�
99 00
99 00 * /
5 r b�5,
5�655.
24y310
87
3�032
871,
23�374;
60!
� 38�553!
288I
2 �� 083
2q593
�17
�17 */
�92
�40
.80
�15
�00
. 0 3-
�96
�42
�33-
�87
CNECK RE6IST�R
V�NDOR
SNAUGHiVE�SY L E JR
SHAUGHNESSY L E JR
SNAUGHPUESSY L E JR
SNAUGHNESSY L t JR
StiAUGHNESSY L c JR
St�AUGtiNESSY L E JR
SHAU6HNESSY L E JR
SHAy LUMEER C�
SNYDEK �RUG STORES
SOUTHVI EW �;AR�J�N C7R
S!�UTHiI:IE�i GAR��N CTR
UNITED CEtiT TKUSTt�
UNITED CE�VT TRUSTE�
UNITED C�NT TRUSTEE
UNTTED CEN7 TRUSTEE
UNITiD CENT TRUSTEE
UNITED LIpY-ST PAUL
ZTEGL�R iNC
FUNO O1 TOTAL
FU�JD Q� TOTAL
FUNO 0� TOTAL
FUND 1� iUTAL
FUND 12 TOTAL
FUND 14 TOTAL
FUND 1` TOTAL
FUfdO 1E TOTAL
FUND 17 TOTAL
FUND 18 TOTAL
ITEM OESCRIPTION I
�
l
COMPUTER DESKS TARG
JUN SVC �
JUN SVC �
JUN SUC i
JUN SYC
JUN S1IC ;
�ur� suc i
�
L8R HQCKEY RINKS i
�
i
KEYS
S00
SPRU.CE
JU].ILY PKM
JUIY PR�M
JULY PREH
JULY PRE M
JllLlf PREM
JULY CON7R
RPRS PLDi�
ACCOUNT N0.
U1-46�0-110-
03-4220-132-�
05-42�0-132-
14-q220-132-i
l�-4e20-132-�
16-4220-132-i
�1-a22a-i32-�
C1-433fl-490-
� 01-4330-440-;
I
�
j-
i 01-4422-050-'.
� - - e�-a4��-�iz-�
f
�
i
i . C1-2071-D04-1
� _._ �I-4132-020-�
! 01-4132-050-:
01-4132-070-;
� . .15-.4132-060-�
�
I
i
--.�- --- - ._. .. __ _ . _ _.._.._.._._ _ .
i
� D1-2fl74-i100-f
GENERA� FUNO '
11A TcR RE 11�NU � FU11D I
ENGR tNTERPR.ISE ;
SPEC�AL PARK FUND !
EQUIPMENi CERTIFICAT£S
CUN50LIDATED DEBT ScRVIC
S�1�ER UT:[LITY
_TIp _I79-7/81-4/.82-2/82-E
UTIL RESERVE i
�iATERSNEO DISTR.ICT i
_ . ._. __..._ � _ _.
J1-h330-490-`.
AMOUNT
167.8 0
131.25
12.18
27w86t3.44
2�2.97
9�.�t€I
42.35-
119i444.85
r1ANUAL cxEcxs
11108
111.09
I1110
11111
IIII�
22II$.
].111�
11118
izii�
11120
11121
�iz2�
1122�
II22�
12125
11126
G.T.
c�£cx RE�ISTLR
YENDtir{
FUND 21 TOTA�
�'UND 2S TOTAL
FUND SI TOTAL
Ft1Np $2 TOTAL
FUND 8� TOTA�
FUND 87 TOTAL
FUtVQ 9� 'fOTAL
TOTAL
$51.00
52.98
2,182.84
16,599.87
I5.00
I50.Od
?61.94
4,955.75
1Q6.38
2,999.04
5,268.88
3,17$.8I
575.00
2,5$1.3i
26,5?2.53
80.Q0
66,931.43
18b,3�T6.28
TTEM OESCRIPiION
INDUS7RIAL DEUELOPMENT
I86-7 C�IPPERFIEl.O 2
I79-3 MT�IAM-FiIA�1 DRAIiVA
I82-7f3ISAN1 �EAS STUO'f
I85-4COPPFRFI�LO iAiVOc"t�.
I83-4183-48 GRYCIOAK CTY
I$4-46(}LiLO XORKT�JN
ACCOUNT N0.
D. Delmont Adance-Expenses
Guy Kullander Computer Dekk
DakataCty Bank FIT Fire Payroll
City M.H. Payroll A/C Net Fire Payroll
Mark Karnowski� Regl Mtg K. Swanson
Minn DepC Health Plan. Review 85-6
N�P 7/I Due Date
PERA _ . 6%6 Payroll '
DOLR SS Div 6/2Q Medicare
�� 6C20 FICA
DC BA.*�k ' 6/20 FTT "
Camm. REvenue 5/31 6/20 SIT
DC Bank 6/20 Payroll Deductions
SCCU "
City M.H. P.R. A/C 6/2Q Net Payroll
I?C Bank 6J6 6i24 Payrall Dedcutions
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RFSOLUTION N0. 86 -
RESOLUTION HOLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HARI�ESS :
GRANTING THE CITY OF I�NDOTA HEIGHTS A VARIANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights fias applied for a variaiee from State
Roles 14, MCAR s 8820.9912, and�
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation has.
ranted subject variance conditionaT upon receipt of a resolution�from the City
hat hol:ds harml:ess the State of Minnesota for such action;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of M'endota Heights indemnifies,
aves, and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and all its agents and employees
f and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions of
hatsoever nature or character ari:sing out of or by reason of, in�any manner, the
_ econstruction of Chippewa Avenue from Trunk Highway No. 149 (Dodd Road) to Trunk
ighway No. 13 (Annapolis) in any other manner than as a 30 m.p.h� street in
ccordance with the Minnesota State Aid Construction Standards tolbe found in the
ules of the Minnesota Department of Transportation 14 MCAR s 8820.9912 or
rising as a result of tfie Commissioner's decision to grant this yariance.
fopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this first day of. •�
��y, i986. 1
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
Roliert G. Lockwood, Mayor•
��A
ithleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
�
�e
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Mi.nnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONST
OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR CHIPPEWA AVENUE, ELLEN STREET,
LANE, HIAWATHA AVENUE, FREMONT AVENUE, MUNICIPAL STATE AID
N0. 140-108-01 AND ADJACENT AREAS (NORTH END STREETS, IMPR
N0. 79, PROJECT N0. 3)
WH REAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed construction
of street improvements for to serve Chippewa Avenue, Ellen Street, Garden
La e, Hiawatha Avenue, Fremont Avenue, (Municipal State Aid Project No. 140-
10 -Ol) and adjacent areas (which improvements have heretofore been known
an designated as Improvement No. 79, Project No. 3), bids were received,
op ned and tabulated according to law and the following bids were riceived
co plying with said advertisement:
N E OF BIDDER
Pi e Bend Paving
Ro emount, MN
Ac Blacktop, Inc.
In er Grove Heights, MN
Al xander Construction Co.
Ap le Valley, MN
Ro ert W. Moore Company
St. Paul, NII�1
Pr ferred Paving, Inc.
Wa onia, MN
Bi uminous Roadways, Inc.
M' neapolis, NII�1
Mc amara Contracting Company
Apple Valley, MN
M. Danner Trucking, Inc.
I ver Grove Heights, A'II�1
A hbach Construction Company
S . Paul, MN
S, L & K Corporation
S . Paul, NA1
a d �
AMOUNT OF BID
$293,689.04
301.108.50
303,758.00
309,703.00
329,288.75
330,824.10
334,350.20
343,826.00
350,617.45
420,442.00
W�EREAS, the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted
P'ne Bend Paving of Rosemount, Minnesota, be accepted.
.
�
v
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci�ty of
ota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the bid of Pine Bend Paving of Rosemount, Minnesota,isubmitted
for the construction of the above described improvements be and the
same is hereby accepted. . �
2. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and direct"ed to
execute and deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to
consummate the awarding of said bids. �
pted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lit day of
y, 1986.
e
athleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGATS
By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayc
47
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
July l;
TO: Mayor, City Council and City 'n�t�ator
FROM: James E. Danielson,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: A & M Movers
Storm Water Project/Lake LeMay Phase I
Job No. 8613
Improvement No. 85, Project No. 6
DISCUSSION:
1986
In designing the Lake LeMay project, staff has worked closely with
the Mn/DOT District 9 staff and they have �informally agreed to have the
State of Minnesota participate in the storm water portion of the�project.
They have asked that the City formally request that participation by
resolution. Tt is estimated that Mn/DOT would share in• approximately
50�+ of the costs. The Mn/DOT staff is going to try to make arrangements
to pay all their• share with this project so that later, when the�Lake
LeMay connection is completed they will not have to be involved.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City formally request Mn/DOT participa^
ti_on in tfie Lake LeMay/A &.M Movers utility project. �
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation the
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 86- , RESOLUTION REQUES
STATE PARTICIPATION IN CITY STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, IMPROVEMEN
PROJECT NO. 6, LAKE LEMAY PHASE I.
should
NO. 85,
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-
RESOLUTION REQUESTING STATE PARTICIPATION IN CITY
STORM SEWER II�PROVEMENTS, IMPROVIIKENT N0. 85, PROJECT N0.
LAKE LEMAY PHASE I
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is proposing to construct a storm
ewer improvement in Mendota Heights to control the water level of Iake
eMay in Mendota Heights and to drain sorne other surrounding landlthat
resently is not drained; and I
WHEREAS, in excess of 50 percent of the land within the dra
strict of this project is owned by the Minnesota Department of
ansportation; and
WHEREAS, the City has been working closely with members of tlie Mn/DOT
trict 9 Hydraulics Section in designing this project to complylwith
I}OT criteria.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Height
quests that Mn/DOT cooperate with the City in this storm water
nstruction project providing their share of the costs incurred.
dopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 1:
uly, 1986.
e
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
thleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
S
Robert G. Lockwood,
;s formally
day of
�
Pursu<
Counc:
Hall,
J
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, May 20, 1986
Page No. 2511
May 20, 1986
nt to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City
l, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City
750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. �
Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at,7:30 o'clock P.M. The
follo ing members were present: Mayor Lockwood�, Councilmembers Blesener,
Cummi s-, Hartmann and Witt.
AGEND ADOPTIONi
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0:
CONS
CALENDAR
.l
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the agenda
for the meeting� including� additiona� items contained
im the add'-on agenda.
Councilmember Cummins� second'ed the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the consent
calendar as submitted and recommended�for approval
as part of the reguTar• agenda, aTong with
authorization�for• execution of all 'necessary
documents contained therein. �
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report
for April.
b. Acknowledgment of a letter from Debra Smith
regarding proposed zoning ordinance amendments.
c. Acknowledgment of a report fromithe City Clerk
regarding computer system acqui�ition.
d. Authorization for the employment of three part-'
time summer employees in the Public Works
Department. ' �
e. Acknowledgment of the Fire Depa'rtment monthly
report for April. �
f. Approval of Change Order No. 1
Addition improvements (Imp. No.
4), in the amount of $3,082.00.
authorization for execution of
by the Mayor and City Clerk. ,
:or Copperfield
85, Proj. No.
along with
:he change order
Page No. 2512
May 20, 1986
g. Approval of the modified critical area site plan
for addition of a deck at 731 Woodridge Drive,
along with approval of the issuance of the
building permit and waiver of the $100 critical
area fee.
��
i.
Approval of the List of Claims dated May 20,
1986 and totalling $120,541.39.
Approval of the list of contractor licenses,
granting licenses to:
State Mechanical, Inc.
Imperial Developers
Steininger Construction Co., Inc.
Genz-Ryan Plumbing� & Heating; Co.
McPhillips Brothers Roofing Co.
College City Construction, Inc.
Pools,. Inc.
Pittelkow Associates
Marick Builders, Inc.
Witcher Construction Co.
Thor Construction Company
Wells Concrete Products Co.
Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating
Excavating
Excavating
Excavating
Gas Piping
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contract�r
General Contrac
General Contrac�.,r
Htg. & Air Cond.
j. Approval: of the issuance of an on-sale 3.2 malt
beverage license to Par 3 Golf, Inc.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
DEER HUNT The Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Craig
Cox, of the Department of Natural Resources,
requesting an exemption from the firearm ordinance
requirements to allow the DNR to conduct a public
deer hunt in the Fort Snelling Park on November 8,
9, 15 and 16. The Council also acknowledged a memo
from the Police Chief supporting the request.
Mr. Cox, present for the discussion, stated that the
hunt is proposed in order to deal with an �
increasingly serious problem of deer overpopulation
in the Minnesota Valley. He described the proposed
hunt plan for the Council and explained the results
of two previous hunts, conducted in 1984 and 1985.
After discussion, Mayor Lockwood moved to approve
exemption from the firearm ordinance regulations to
Ayes : I5
Nays: 0
PUBLICI COMMENTS
FILL F�ERMIT REQUEST
Page No. 2513
May 2 �, 1986
allow the DNR deer hunt as requested.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Mr. Joe Trader, 564 Hiawatha, expressed his concern
and that of his neighbors over a lot on Chippewa
Avenue which was excavated for a basement months
ago. He stated that the house whicli was moved to
the lot is still standing on wheels�and that the
fence placed around the excavation is on newly,
excavated ground and never stand. Mr. Trader asked
what the City can_do if the contractor stalls all
summer, and whether the City can force the
contractor to fill the hoTe if the excavation was
done before a permit was issued. j
A€ter discussion, Council directed staff to contact
the contractor to require a tentative schedule for
completion, to notify him that unless completion
occurs within a certain period of time the City will
take action. Staff was also directed to make a
status report to the neighbors. �
The Council acknowledged a report from the Public
Works Director regarding a wetlands,'permit approved
in March, 1984 for the Callahan property on Marie
Avenue at Dodd Road and a request from Mr. Mike
MickeTson, o€ Mickelson Specialties,� for approval of
a plan for the filling of the property under the
1984 wetlands permit. �
Mr. Mickelson, present-for the discussion, reviewed
the proposed plan and stated that he would like to
grade the property for walk-outs, easing the grade
from the street to the creek. He stated that the
structure of the developer's agreement is such that
there will be a gradually sloping grade, continuing
the grade from one lot to another starting at the
Rushs' lot. Mr. Mickelson stated tliat he is
currently requesting confirmation of the wetlands
permit for the entire parcel now and that he will
apply for subdivision at a future date.
Public Works Director Danielson sta
believes the original wetlands perm
should apply as long as the develop
flow elevations and setbacks contai
developer's agreement. He pointed
Mickelson would like to have more t
that he
approval
maintains
in the
that Mr.
a year to
the
�
Page No. 2514
May 20, 1986
complete the project. Mr. Danielson informed the
Council that Mr. Mickelson is a homebuilder who is
working with the Clapp Thomssen Company as
representatives of Brady High School, the owner of
the property. He also brought up the issue o€
engineering fees which had been incurred by the City
in the preparation of the €easibility report and
plans and specifications for drainage improvements.
He stated that at a past Council meeting at which
Mr. Terry Davern� of Clapp-Thomssen was present, it
was suggested that the $7,527 in engineering�costs
be equally d�ivided between the property owner and'
the Ci:ty.
CounciTmember Hartmann stated that the engineering
costs are for• a creekbed project which� benefits the
subject property and that he would not be in�favor
of the City absorbing 50% of the costs. Mayor•
Lockwood concurred, pointing out that the
engineering work was done at the request o€ the�
prior owner. He €elt that a considerably greater
portion of the engineering study was €or the benefit
of the subject property than for upstream ,
properties.
Councilmember
work was done
but rather so
developed.
Witt pointed out that the engineering�
not for an area storm sewer project
that the Callahan property, could be
Mr. Mickelson stated that discussions over the costs
were held prior to his involvement in the project
and referred to a report prepared by City Engineer
Kishel. He felt that the cost is excessive just for
the rerouting of the stream and some drainage work.
Mr. Danielson responded that the plans and
specifications had been prepared, bids were taken
and the project was staked, all in response to Mr.
Callahan's request to "fast-track" the project and
his petition and hearing waiver.
Mr. Mickelson asked whether a portion of the cost
could be refunded to him if he assumes the total
cost now and an upstream project is completed in the
future. City Attorney Hart indicated that this
would not be a problem. He pointed out, however,
that it would be clifficult to establish a benefit
upstream by moving the creek, since it seems that
the major reason for the project is to create thrF
buildable lots on the property.
Ayes
Nays
LIL
Ayes:
Nays:
5
0'
5
0
Page�No. 2515
May 20, 1986
Mr. Mickelson stated that he agrees that most of the
costs are attributable to the property and would
accept the costs, but asked that they be
incorporated into the project costs and assessed
against the properties. �
Councilmember Cummins moved to con
the 1984 wetlands permit for Lot 2
Addition, approval of the filling,
one lot at a time, along, with auth
Mayor and Clerk to execute the dev
as amended to remove the first par
third condition and to reduce the
the same paragraph to $3,000�.
Councilmember Witt seconded� the mo
irm approval of
Willow Springs
f the property
rization for the
loper's agreement
graph of the
scrow deposit in
UTILITY The Council acknowledged` a� memo fr•on
ON Works Director r• espond�ing; io a� lettE
Rea�lty ree�uesting� approval of the cc
property, on Highway 13 (at Victoria)
the City,'s sewer and water systemsi
Larson, from McGovern Realty was pre
discussion. �
Mr. Larson stated that he represen
interested in�purchasing the two a
24 townhouses ar•e proposed to be c
Larson stated that he feels the pr�
charge reflected in the Public Wor:
was excessi:ve, particularly the in�
calculation, and asked that Counci:
reducing or delaying payment on th�
the Public
• from McGovern
.nection of a
in Lilydale to
Mr. Dean
ent for the:
a developer
e site on which�
structed. Mr.
osed hook-up
Director's memo
rest
consider
charge.
Public Works Director Danielson informed the Council
that staff receives numerous inquiries about
connection of properties outside of the City to the
utility systems and that most ofteri people choose to
install on-site systems because of;hook-up charges.
After discussion, Councilmember
table the matter and to direct
recommended policy for utility
and to prepare a recommended co
the subject property consistent
recommendation.
Councilmember Blesener seconded
Cummins moved to
staff to prepare a
conriection charges
nnection charge for
with the policy
motion.
Councilmember Blesener expressed concern that even
Council has no control over development outside of
Page No. 2516
May 20, 1986
the City, City residents should be informed on what
is being proposed for development before Council
takes any action on cannection requests.
METHODIST CHURCH Public Works Director Danielson reviewed the plans
' IMPROVEMENT PROJECT and specifications for public improvements to serve
St. Paul's United Methodist Church and adjacent
areas.
After discussion,, Councilmember Cummins moved
adoption of Resolution No. 86-37, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENTS
TO SERVE ST. PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AND
ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86,_ PROJECT NO. 2)."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
DARSOW FARM The Council acknowledged a report from Administrator
PRESERVATION Frazell regarding Ms. Kalista Laudon's request for
preservation of the Darsow farm, along with a packet
of information from Ms. Laudon.
Mayor Lockwood informed the Council that he has
visited the property and believes that preservation
should be investigated, since there is strong
possibility that the farmstead may be the oldest
building in the City in unaltered condition. He
stated that he has spoken to Dick Putnam, of Tandem,
Corporation, to ask for time to pursue the issue
even though the preliminary plat for Copperfield
phase two has been approved. Mayor Lockwood felt
that there are several options available, but that
each of the options will require months to pursue.
He reviewed the various options, which included
moving the buildings, development of the plat with
the exception of the four lots surrounding the
farmstead, making the farmstead a preserve, or
allowing someone to live on the farmstead without
making it a preserve. He stated that he would not
want to be responsible for a decision either now or
next month that would result in the buildings being
turned over to the fire department for training
purposes. He felt that preservation deserves some
time for study.
In response to a question from the Mayor, Park
Commission member Bob Doffing reviewed Commission
discussions on the matter. He stated that while
there was Commission sympathy for preserving the
Page No. 2517
May 20, 1986
farmstead, it was the Commission's feeling that the
use would not generally fit into the park plan for
the City and that the Commission would not be in
support for using special park fund�monies to
purchase the site or operate a program.
Mr. Dick Putnam stated that he has :
belief that preservation is not a g�
he would work with the City if it w,
the buildings. He further stated t:
number of people willing to finance
and property acquisition, he would :
modify the preliminary plat to go a
buildings. He pointed out that it
the southeast area study and that h
long it would take for a� historical
stated� that there are people waitin�
build on some o€ the lots and that :
off on the plat for a year. Mr. Pu
is important to know what is entail
preservation, a two acre preserve o
historical preserve and program. H
it is important to tell the people �
homes in the first phase what is pr
stated that if the proposal is to p
farmstead on the two acre site he w
plat. He noted that there will be
required as the park contribution f
development and that he would dedic
area if Council preferred it over a
area.
Councilmember Cummins stated that h
would be nice if a small parcel cou
preserve the buildings but pointed
preliminary plat has already been a
the preservation issue was brought
in the process for any action to be
suggested that the burden should be
Laudon and other interested parties
in two weeks with identified financ
proposal which indicates that a pro
preservation is realistic.
Ms. Laudon stated that she would be
undertake pursuing financing throug
individuals. She informed the Coun
Minnesota Historical Society is hav
meeting on the matter this week. S
the information which had been subm
agenda packets.
ot changed his
od idea but that
nts to preserve
at if he sees a
the preservation
e willing to
ound the
ook a year for
is not sure how
study. He
to acquire and�
e cannot hold
nam felt that it
d in the
� a 20 to 30 acre
also felt that
�ho have bought
�posed. He
�eserve the
11 change the
�oughly two acres
�r phase 3 of the
te the farmstead
active park '
believes it
d be saved to
ut that the
proved and
p a little late
taken. He
put on Ms.
to come back
ng and a
ram and
willing to
agencies and
il that the
ng a preliminary
e also reviewed
tted in the
Page No. 2518
May 20, 1986
Mr. Robert Keane, from the Dakota County Historical
Society, informed Council that he doubted that the
site could be designated as historical in two weeks.
He reviewed the criteria necessary for nomination to
the historical register and stated that he is not
sure that the farmstead meets any of the criteria.
Several members of the audience spoke on the matter,
expressing their support or opposition.
After lengthy discussion, it was the consensus of
Council that the matter be tabled for two weeks to
await input from the state historical society and a
r•eport from Ms. Laudon addressing a preservation
program including who wi1T own and' operate the
facility, financing and on-going costs.
NEIGHBORHOOD The Council acknowledged a memo from the City
COMMERCIAL CENTER Administrator regarding a preliminary proposaT €rom
the Tandem Corporation for development of a
neighborhood commercial center at the northeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road.
Mr. Dick Putnam stated that the City Administrato�
had suggested that he appear before the Council for
an informal discussion on his preliminary proposal
for the neighborhood commercial center prior to:
making application for Planning Commission
consideration. He briefly reviewed uses which had
been considered for development of the site other
than the commercial development, uses which included
double bungalows, townhouses, a regional church and
an office park. He stated that after considering
the several alternatives, he believes that the
property would be an excellent site for a
neighborhood commercial center. He informed Council
that he has held neighborhood meetings to present
the idea to area residents, sending notices of the
meetings to 65 property owners, and notified the
Friendly Hills Civic Association through its
president. He stated that there were 18 to 20
people present for the first meeting and only 5 or 6
at the second. Mr. Putnam stated that he believes
the Friendly Hills residents would be in favor of
the proposal because it would reduce commercial type
trips on Decorah to Dodd. Mr. Putnam then reviewed
drawings of the proposed development for the
Council. He informed Council that he would love +
develop elderly housing on the portion of the
property not planned for commercial use.
ATHLETI
Ayes:
Nays:
FACILITY
Page No. 2519
May 20; 1986
Mrs. Julie Losleben, 815 Hazel Court; expressed her
opposition to commercial development�on the site.
Mr. Irving Clark, owner of the prope'rty just east of
the site, stated indicated that he i's in favor of
the proposal. He stated that he attended the first
neighborhood meeting and that only one of the people
present voiced loud� objection to the�project.
Councilmember• Blesener stated that the property, is
the front door to Mendota Heights fr•om the €r•eeway,
and that she feels the need�f'or the pr•oper•ty to fit
into the Council's vision statement,�setting�a�
standard for- the image o€ the City ii that area.
Mr. Putnam agreed', sta�ting that it will. also�be the
entrance to the Copper•field� ar-ea. He- stated that he�
does not believe the� site couTd� be' d'eveloped� as, a�
quality residential project and' that�he believes the
eommercial development would provide�a� better• use
for the site and a more appropriate entrance to the
City and the neighborhood�.
The Council acknowledged a memo from the City
Administrator reporting on efforts to develop joint
athletic facilities at Henry Sibley �igh School.
Councilmember Witt moved to approve designated� City,
officials, the Mayor, City Administrator, Park
Commission Chairperson and Park Commission member
Robert Dof€ing, to initiate discussions with school
district officials about joint development of Henry
Sibley, and to authorize execution o�f the Barton-
Aschman Associates proposal to provi'de services at a
cost not to exceed $3,100, contingent upon the
school district agreeing to contrib�te half of the
costs.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
ACQUISITION The Council acknowledged a report f
Shaughnessy recommending the use of
certificates to finance the purchas
system and further recommending acq
additional computer which would not
would serve as a training unit.
Councilmember Hartmann moved to
Equipment Certificates for fina
m Treasurer
quipment
of the computer
sition of an
e networked but
ve the use of
the computer
Page No. 2520
May 20, 1986
system and to authorize acquisition of a training
unit.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
LEXINGTON HEIGHTS The Council acknowledged a memo from Treasurer
APARTMENT FINANCING Shaughnessy informing Council that he has received a
request from the owners of the Lexington Heights
Apartment complex to authorize permanent financing
for the housing revenue bonds originally issued for
the project in accordance with the original bond
resolution.
Mr. Jerry Hertel, from Juran and Moody, informed
Council that short term bonds are currently being
sold� ever• y six months� and� that adoption of the
authorizing resolution will allow the owners to get
a€iXed� inter•est rate on a long term basis.
Councilmember Witt moved adoption of Resolution No.
86-38, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE REMARKETING OF
HOUSING MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS (LEXINGTON HEIGHTS
APARTMENTS PROJECT) MORTGAGE AND APPROVING THE FO
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS."
Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD Mayor Lockwood moved adoption of Resolution No. 86-
VARIANCE 39, "RESOLUTION REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO THE M.S.A.
STANDARDS FOR MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD CONSTRUCTION EAST
OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 149, DODD ROAD, M.S.A. PROJECT NO.
140-103-05 (IMPROVEMENT NO. 83, PROJECT 7A)."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PERSONNEL
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize the
employment of John Benson as summer Code Enforcement
intern at the rate of $7.00 per hour.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
RADAR UNITS Mayor Lockwood moved to
department to purchase
radar unit for $1,895.
Councilmember Hartmann
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
authorize the police
a Kustom HR-12 hand held
seconded the motion.
VISIOI� STATEMENT
Ayes:
Nays:
5
0'
MISCEIbLANEOUS
Ayes:
Nays:
I5
0
ATTES'11:
G. Lockwood
Mayor
Page No. 2521
May 20, 1986
Discussion on the City Vision Statement was tabled
to the May 21st Board of Review mee�ing. �
The Council acknowledged a memo from the City Clerk
regarding the need for temporary cl�rical help.
Councilmember Witt moved to authorize staff to
contact employment agencies and contract for
temporary secretarial services for a period o€ time
beginning approximately June 1st and ending
approximately August 31st.
Councilmember Hartmann� seconded the motion.
The Council acknowTedged a� memo from the Public
Works Director respond�ing� to a CounciT concern over
the filling of lots along Mar•ie Ave�ue.
There being no further business to come before the
Council, Councilme
meeting be adjourn
Councilmember Witt
TIME OF ADJOURNMEN
, � rtE��o . =
DATE: June 24, 1986
� T0: ;Sa�•or,� City Council and City �t ator i•.
• 4
FRO`t: Paul R. Berg �
Code Enforcement Officer
. ��
. k'.
^ SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for June, 1986 �;ti:
�:.
CURRENT MONTH ., YEAR TO DATE -���a6 YEAR`TO`DATE�= �g�
• i
[. :
. h0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED N0. VALUATION FEE COLLECTED N0. VALUATION
3LDG PER�(ITS • -•-
SFD' 18 2,334,545.94 15,026.36 47 5,862,524.19 38,555.97 22 2,717,498.45 '
F'4 �C
� T O O O O O O O �s2 O
c/z 4 1,171,400.00 5,479.66 12 4,198,900.00 19,563.01 20 �`';254,995.00
:�stsc. 17 79,415.91 1,364.52 79 477,087.87 7,123.57 50 ��330,381.70
su� TOTAL 39 3,585,361.85 21,870.54 138 10,538,512.06 65,242.55 92 ,�302,875.70
�; :
TRaDE PER:`(ITS
Plbg 11
wtr 15
Swr 7
Htg, AC,
Gas Pipe 6
SUB TOTAL 39
� LICEhSIrG
--' Contractor's
' Licenses 3�
376.00 48
75.00 42
,122.50 25
892.50 55
1,466�.00 • 170
975.00 265
1,228.00 13
190.00 28
402.50 22
3,471.00 38
5,291.50 121
6,625.00
207
:�
: '
FEE COLL�CT�
17,811.77
O
28,476.76
4,650.35
� • : ::
868.00
12",637.50
385.00
2,905.50
16,796.00
5,175.00'
.. r,
t�
� TOTAL 117 $3,585,361.85 $24,311.54 573 $10,538,512.06 $77,159.05 420 $9;302,875.15 $72,909.88
• ;
�
. ,
� t. .
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac� Wac and State Surcharge. Amounts show�.will reflect only permit, plan check fe�e a
valuation amounts. �� ••
� T.
i
i
�^
'�: �t . . .
. _ ..:.v.:
:'r . •.
,;� '
�
�
Planninc
June 24
Page One
The regi
order b�
present;
Also pre
Howard I
Commission Minutes
1986
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 24, 1986
ilar meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was called to
� Chairperson Morson at 8:00 P.M. The following membe'rs were
Morson, Burke, Henning, Frank, Duggan, McMonigal, and Krebsbach.
:sent were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Planning Consultant
)ahlgren, and City Administrator Kevin Frazell. �
APPROVA� OF
MINUTES
Ayes:
Nays:
CASE #8
DEVELOP:
REZONIN�
CUP FOR
INANCE .
Minutes of the May 27 meeting had b
previously.
Commissioner Burke moved approval ofJthe minutes as
submitted.
Commissioner McMonigal seconded the
submitted
-19, HAYBER Chairperson Morson called the meetin
ENT GROUP, the purpose of a public hearing on a
, SUBDIVISION, from Hayber Development Group for th
PUD, AND ORDIN- subdivision, conditional use permit
MENDMENT unit development, and ordinance amen
property located on Mendakota Countr
Morson noted that this proposal requ
Comprehensive Plan amendment which c
considered at the July meeting. It
considered at this meeting as the pu
notice did not state that a comprehe
amendment was requested. He noted t
Commission could consider preliminar
submitted with this request, even th
not complete at this time.
�
Mr. Louis Brenner, representing Mend
Club, was present and he noted that
part of the overall development of M
gave a brief history of the expenses
building a new clubhouse, noting tha
would be in the $3 million range and
that much money, the club would have
member $100 per month for some time.
the clubhouse is falling more and mo
disrepair and in 1983, the club came
plan of selling off 12 acres to a de
develop enough finances to build a n
A specialty shopping center would be
tion.
to order for
application
rezoning,
or a planned
ment for
Club. Chair
res a
uld be
ould not be
lic hearing
sive plan
at the
plans
ugh plans are
kota Country
he plan is
ndakota. He
involved in
the cost
that to raise
to assess each
He noted that
e into
up with the
eloper to
w clubhouse.
proposed for
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1986
Page Two
�
the 12 acre site, which requires a preliminary
sketch plan approval as the first step in the PUD
process. This 12 acre parcel was sold to Howard
Bergerud and Mendakota will purchase enough land
from Bream Homes to replace this land. He noted�
that they would like to break ground this season on
this project.
Mr. Brenner noted that Mendakota has addressed all
the points and concerns raised by the Minority
Report on the Downtown Mendota H.eights Task Force.
He then introduced Mr. James Wenker from Hayber
Development Group.
Mr. Wenker spoke on previous developments that they
were involved in and noted that his firm has been
in business for 7-8 years. They have constructed
$150 million of shopping development during that
time, and they developed three of the four malls
located at Victoria Crossing in St. Paul. He noted
that he has generally received a very positive
response from prospective tenants for the proposed
mall. He stated that the project will be
constructed in two phases, with 50,000 square fee
in phase 1, which will include a restaurant. They
could stretch out to two or three construction
seasons between phase 1 and phase 2, and they were
desirous of having the property rezoned correctly.
Mr. Tom D'Angelo, architect from Architectural
Alliance noted that there would be two parking
lots, one located at each end of the mall. The
mall will be internalized, with no individual
entrances to the shops, just from the ends of the
mall. The mall will be two level, with an upper
and a lower parking lot. He also noted that many
of the existing mature trees will be saved. He
stated that the parking will be in accordance with
the City codes, one stall per 80 feet of restaurant
space, and one stall for 200 feet of commercial
space.
He noted that the major entrance is proposed to
align with the entrance on the east side of Dodd
Ro'ad�.and that there will be three entrances to the
site: The structures will be wood shingled roofs,
with a stone/masonry building base.
Planni
June 2
Page Th
� Commission Minutes
, 1986
:e
Jerry Pirkl, golf course architect,
club has bought 12 acres to the sou
to replace these 12 sold to Bergeru
that some tree planting and berming
the rear of the buildings, and stre
scheduling is a big factor in the d
two week delay could mean the loss
noted that the
h of the club
. He noted
will be done on
sed that
velopment. A
f fall seeding.
Mr. Hugh Cosgrove, Chairman of the Building
Committee, earnestly solicited approval of the
proposal, and noted that many hoursJwere devoted to
this project. �
Planner Dahlgren was asked to respond to the plan
and he noted that the plan envisions leaving TH 149
in its present alignment. He notedlthat three
things must happen in order to approve the project:
1. The Comprehensive Plan must be amended since it
now shows this land as golf course.) This amendment
must be approved by the Metropolitan Council after
a ten day review period. �
2. After review and approval by
Council, a rezoning could be app
3. Approval of a conditional use
planned unit development could be
rezoning.
Metropolitan
rmit for a
anted after
Planner Dahlgren noted that staff needs the market
research results as part of the PUD process and he
stated that it was his opinion that this project is
of extremely high quality with much green space.
The character of the development gives it a country
club look of quality. �
Chairperson Morson asked for questi�ns or comments
from the Commission members.
Commissioner Krebsbach asked Mr. Brenner why it
took this long to bring the proposal to the
Commission if they are desirous of iommencing this
season.
Commissioner Duggan asked what will
Bream's proposed project does not r
approval. Mr. Brenner stated that
happen
�ceive
ill this
if
hinges
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1986
Page Four
together. Commissioner Duggan asked what will
happen if TH 149 moves easterly. Is Mendakota
Country Club prepared to go ahead anyway?
Commissioner Burke expressed concern that all of
the parking area not be done in one phase.
Commissioner Krebsbach asked what happens if Phase
II never develops - what happens to the existing
parking lot. Mr. Brenner said this would be
landscaped.
Chairperson Morson asked for questions or comments
from the audience.
Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, expressed
concern with the wording of the public hearing
notice. He asked what the land is being rezoned
from and what the new zoning is proposed to be.
Chairperson Morson noted that there could be no
hearing on the rezoning because a Comprehensive
Plan amendment is needed first.
Mr. Russell Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, asked about
deferred assessments on Mendakota Country Club
property, and will they be put back on the books
now. Staff was directed to research the deferment
history. Mr. Brenner thought the deferment was in
the area of the maintenance road between the lake,
not in this particular area proposed for�•
development.
There were no further questions or comments from
the audience.
Mr. Brenner noted that a number of residents
present at the hearing were in favor of the
proposal and he asked that the hearing not be
closed.
Commissioner Henning moved to recommend approval of
r4�`the sketch plan as submitted.
>.,,,r;yCommissioner Duggan seconded the� motion. After
•some discussion, no vote was taken.
" Commissioner Henning suggested that the hearing be
adjourned to the July meeting.
Plannin
June 24
Page Fi
Ayes:
Nays:
CASE #
PRESER
SUBDIV
Commission Minutes
1986
City Administrator Frazell suggestedJ
considered a pre-application meeting�
that this be
Mr. Brenner suggested that the rezoning be from R-1
(golf course) to B-4 (shopping center).
Commissioner Frank moved to continue�the public
hearing and directed staff to send nlw hearing
notices for the July 22 meeting.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
Mr. Brenner asked if a special meet
conducted to help expedite the proc
Staff was directed to republish the
noting the Comprehensive Plan amend
and to send new notices to affected
owners again. '
-20, THE Chairperson Morson called the meeti
(Mike Kurtz), 9:25 o'clock P.M. for the purpose o
ION hearing on an application from Mr.
for the subdivision of land known a
Pond property. Mr. Marcel Ebenstei
Lake Road, New Brighton, a partner
noted that his firm develops land a
homes, they do not build them. The
are in the $170,000 price range. H
. there are 28 acres in the plat and
lots are proposed. Seven of the lo
could be
s.
earing notice,
nt request,
roperty
g to order at
a public
ichael Kurtz
the Warrior
er, 1987 Long
ith Mr. Kurtz,
d markets
r market homes
noted that
3 single family
s east of the
pond only have 94 feet of frontage,,so variances
would be needed for these lots. It�was noted that
there is no grading plan submitted yet. He also
noted that utility construction coul�d be started in
November, with home construction slated for spring
of 1987. They would request that sewer and water
utilities be build by an outside coritractor, not by
the City. They will try to save as�many evergreens
as possible on the south end of theiproject.
Mr. Ebensteiner noted
rezoning from R-lA to
that no action can be
since the grading pla
Commission could act o
that they are�requesting a
R-l. The Commission noted
taken on the wetlands permit
n is not available, but the
n the
Commissioner Frank asked if
rezoning and variance.
this required a
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1986
Page Six
Comprehensive Plan amendment. Planner Dahlgren
advised that yes, this plan also required a
Comprehensive Plan amendment, since the area is
shown as rural residential, and will be changed to
a residential designation.
Chairperson Morson asked for questions and comments
from the audience.
Mr. Neal Quehl, 1968 South Lane, said the pond has
been a problem for the last 34 years that he has
lived there. Many years he has to wait for the
pond to dry up before he can cut the grass. He
suggested that utility drawings and a storm system
plan be submitted.
Mr. Charles Garr, 1911 Knob Road, noted that the
water level in the pond fluctuates, and it has
since the high school was constructed. He felt a
more updated water elevation level should be
required, since the one presented was based on
1970 data.
Mr. Russell Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, stated the
pond is great and he loves to feed the ducks there
every day. He stated that the price of the lots
around the pond will be around $50,000, and he was
aware that the land was purchased from the School
District for a little over $500,000. �If 23 lots
sell for $50,000 each, there would be around
$400,000 profit. He could see no hardship for the
variances requested for the seven lots with 94 feet
of frontage, and he stated he does not want any
variances allowed for the wetlands. He also asked
who will pay for the storm sewer down South Lane.
Mr. Ebensteiner noted that the $52,000 lot.price
includes the price of assessments, which would
range from $15,000 to $18,000 per lot.
Mr. David Rischall, 610 Callahan Place, expressed
concern over the excess traffic from the school.
There were no further questi,ons or comments from
��the audience.
Commissioner Henning moved to table this hearing to
the July 22 meeting, at 8:30 P.M., and directed
Plannin
June 24
Page S
Ayes:
Nays:
Commission Minutes
1986
CASE #8�-16, HALLEY,
SUBDIVI ION
staff to publish notices for the C
amendment, with no mailed notices.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the m
Chairperson Morson called the meetin
the purpose of a public hearing on a
from Mr. Michael Halley for the subd
Wachtler property. Mr. Halley noted
is designated as the #2 site for an
park in the City. He stated that th
homes could run from $175,000 to $90
average being $300,000. His firm no
around 12 homes per year. He also s
variances would be requested and tha
with residents of Cherry Hills 2nd A
were amicable to their concerns, one
that they wanted the lots on the nor
of the property to be 152 feet deep,
area between the subdivisions. The
expressed a desire to retain the tem
sac on Farmdale Road and NSP is will
three lots to act as a buffer for th
Mr. Halley stated that Outlots A
dedicated to the City if:
1. In 1987, the City could instal
improvements for a baseball diamond
1. Two tennis courts.
3. "Tot" lot (one).
4. Small basketball court (one).
ehensive Plan
��
� to order for
application
vision of the
that this site
ctive regional
price of
,000, with the
mally builds
ated that no
they had met
dition and
of which was
hern boundary
to give more
esidents also
orary cul-de-
ng to purchase
ir tank farm.
B would be
and pay for
nd backstop,
He noted that plans call for a six f'oot berm, with
pine trees, along Wachtler and bricksmonuments
naming Ivy Park being constructed. �He also noted
that the three property owners in th�e southeast
area of the plat will be indemnified�from any
assessments arising from this project.
Mr. Gerald Sundee, consultant engine�er, noted that
48 single family homes are proposed �on 39 acres.
An existing storm sewer goes north in Farmdale
Planning Cammission Minutes
June 24, 2986
Page Eight
Road.
Planner Dahlgren pointed out a public safety
concern in the park area and the lack af adequate
access ta the praposed park.
Chairperson Morson asked for questions or comments
from the audience.
Mr. John Huber, 1359 Cherry Hill Road, noted that
he represented 23 nezghbors in Cherry Hill 2nd
Addition. He noted that Mr. Halley is very
amicable ta the reszdents in Cherry Hills. He
noted that they are opposed to a regional park in
the area but liked the neighborhood park concept.
They would like tha cul-de-sac kept as is, but they
wauld prefer a through street there, as opposed to
a regianal park in the plat.
Mr. John Wirt, 1395 Farmdale Road, stated that
there are six homes on the cul-de-sac now and that
a new cul-de-sac could serve Z4 homes.
Mr. David Trudeau, 1385 Farmdale Road, lives neaz
the end af the cul-de-sac and stated that it is af
such a sharp degree that it is a dangerous corner.
Mr. John Salisbury, 1450 Wachtler, expressed
cancern with the six faot berm and pine trees a2ang
Wachtler. He stated that he would rather see the
new homes than just their roaftaps. � �
Mr. Andy Freeman, 1362 Cherry Hill Road, expressed
concern Qver the propased park. He Iikes the quiet
neighborhood, and did not want to listen to
ballgames in his backyard until 8 or 9�n the
evening. '
Mr. Ronald Nards�rand, 1344 Cherry HiII Road spoke
in favor of the development, and expressed a desire
to have NSP bury the feeder lines.
There being no further questians or comments from
the audience, Commissiorier Duggari moved to close
the public hearing at 10;47 P.M.
�� Commissianer McMonigal seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Planni
June 2
Page Ni�
Nays:
Ayes:
Nays:
Commission Minutes
1986
, Henning and Frank
CASE #8�6-17,
KNOLLMAIIER, CUP FOR
FENCE
Ayes:
Nays:
The nay votes were cast because the'hearing was
closed. i
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to defer a decision on
the preliminary plat until after the Park and
Recreation Commission heard the presentation
regarding the park at their July 8th meeting.
Commissioner Frank seconded the motion. ,
Chairperson Morson called the meeting to order for
the purpose of a public hearing on a�n application
from Mr. and Mrs. Paul Knollmaier, 1090 West Circle
Court, who applied for a conditionali use permit to
allow installation of a 3 rail split rail fence, 46
inches tall, abutting Lexington Avenue. They
propose to line the split rail fence with a green
vinyl mesh to help contain their three small
children. Mr. Knollmaier noted that the fence
is not completed and the poles are s�et loosely into
the holes. He noted that they wou•ld remove the
mesh when the children are older, and presented
written approvals from their contiguous neighbors.
There being no questions or commen
audience, Commissioner Frank moved
public hearing at 11:00 P.M., and
approval of the conditional use pe
fence installation with the provis
green mesh be in place no longer t.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the m
from the
close the
recommend
t to allow the
that the
1990.
on.
Henning (he did not want to see an imposed time limit on removal
of the green vinyl mesh). j
CASE #8�6-14, DOUGHERTY,
MINOR CICJP FOR FENCE
Mrs. Kathleen Dougherty, 1263 Delaware, was present
to request approval of a minor conditional use
permit to allow installation of a 60 inch fence on
the northwest corner of Delaware and Mears. The
fence will be chain link and is needed to contain
two valuable dogs. Mrs. Dougherty's adjacent
neighbors had given written permission for the
fence installation.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1986
Page Ten
Ayes:
Nays:
Ayes:
Nays:
7
0
7
0
Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend waiver of
the required public hearing.
Commissioner McMonigal seconded the motion.
Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit to allow a 60 inch
chain link fence at 1263 Delaware.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
CASE #86-15, JOHNSON, Mr. Richard Johnson, owner of 1920 Glenhill Road,
VARIANCE was present to request a three foot variance to
allow construction of a hot tub addition to the
south side of his home.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
CASE #86-22, RABANUS
VARIANCE
Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend approval
of a three foot sideyard setback variance to allow
construction of a hot tub at 1920 Glenhill Road.
Commissioner Frank seconded the motion.
Mr. Richard Rabanus, 681 Callahan Place, was
present to request a variance to allow�a five foot
fence to be placed in the existing trees on his
corner lot, to protect his newly constructed
swimming pool He noted that he has received
written approval from his neighbors for his fence
installation.
There was a good deal of discussion concerning
visibility on the corner lot, with many tree limbs
encroaching within the 30 foot�setback.
Commissioner Burke felt that the limbs need
trimming. Mr. Rabanus noted that NSP trimmed the
trees three years ago. It was also noted by the
Commission that no hardship is involved, the
placement of the fence in the trees is the choice
of Mr. Rabanus.
Chairperson Morson stated that an inspection should
be made on this corner to see if there is an
ordinance violation regarding visibility.
Plannir�g
June 2 9� ,
Page ElE
Ayes:
Nays:
MI
VERBAL
TIME
Commission Minutes
1986
5
2, Henning, Frank
Commissioner
of a 15 foot
fence at 681
Commissioner
�a
McMonigal moved to
variance to allow
Callahan Place.
recommend approval
installation of a
Duggan seconded the motion.
Mr. Russell Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, expressed
concern over use on a corner lot of�the 30 foot
setback and the wasted use of this area.
OUS Public Works Director Danielson not
Commission that he had received a c
O'Brien, from Falls View Court, who
she needed a wetlands permit to all
of a swimming pool about 30 feet fr
- area of Ivy Falls Creek. He presen
Commission with the information she
and Chairperson Morson polled the C
. whether they wanted to act on this
meeting.
Commissioner Henning was concerned
precedent, whereby staff would pres
the Commission with no one present,
application, no drawings, etc., as
written staff reports. It was thei
if she knew she needed a pool, she
applied for the wetlands permit soo
have waited until the day of the me
concensus was that they did not wis
this matter at this meeting, that s
before them like anyone else would
follow the necessary steps and proc
d to the
11 from a Mrs.
just found out
w construction
m the wetlands
ed the
had given him
mmission on
atter at this
�ith setting a
nt a case to
no fee, no
�ell as no
� concensus that
hould have
er, and not
ting. Their
to consider
e should appear
ave to, and
dures involved.
Public Works Director Danielson gave a verbal
review of the Bream case, and the Brodd and
Frillman cases that appeared before�the City
Council.
MEETINGS Chairperson Morson noted the latene
Commission meetings and asked the m
would like to begin their meetings
8:00 P.M. After a unanimous vote,
is requesting Council approval to s
regular meetings at 7:00 P.M., star
1986.
s of recent
mbers if they
arlier than
the Commission
art their
ing on July 22,
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1986
Page Twelve
MISCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
0
Commissioner Duggan expressed concern over the
method of noticing a halt to fence construction
regarding the Dougherty case. The Commission
concurred and felt that a follow-up letter should
be sent to avoid misunderstandings of this nature.
The Commission members noted the names they
preferred for their nameplates at the Commission
meetings in the future.
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the
' Commission, Commissioner Krebsbach moved that the
meeting be adjourned.
Commissioner Burke seconded the motion.
Ayes: 7
Nays: 0
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:01 o'clock A.M.
,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 25, 1986
T0:
or, City Council and City A ' t��r
FROM:I Mary Ann DeLaRosa
Deputy Clerk
. Time Change for Planning Commission Meeting
During the June 24 Planning Commission meeting., Chairperson Morson
comm nted on the lateness of recent Commission meetings, and polled the
othe members on whether they would like to start the meetings earlier.
The oncensus of the Commission members was that they would like to have
the eetings start at 7:OO�P.M., rather than the current 8:00 P.M., and
they would like Council approval for this action, commencing with the�
July 22nd meeting.
7:00
madl
UIRED
If Council concurs with the desire of the Planning Commission, t
d pass a motion approving a Pla nning Commission meeting time of
o'clock P.M., starting with the July 22nd meeting.
t
iey
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JULY � 1'986
Concrete and Masonry License
D & S Cement Company
Delaney Construction Inc.
Excavating License
Bollig & Sons, Inc.
Jackson Excavating
Latterner Excavating, Inc.
Stocker Excavating Company, Inc.
Gas Piping License
Beami.sh Heating and Air Conditioning
Dependable Heating and Air Conditioning
General Contractin� License
Al Baker Construction:
R.W. Compton, Inc.
Louis W. Frillman
John Kraemer & Sons, Inc.
Narloch Construction
Nicholson Construction
Sunshine Construction Company
HeatinQ and Air ConditioninQ License
Beamish Heating and Air Conditioning
Harris Waldinger Corporation
1
T0:
and City Council
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 25, 1986
FROM• Kevin D.
City Adm' i��t
�
SUBJE T: Discussion with Fran Zeuli of Continental Cablevision
a fe
upda
r. Fran Zeuli, Regional Manager for Continental Cablevision,
minutes during the Introduction section of the agenda. Fran
� Council on Continental's progress in cable construction in
KDF: fnadlr
;1 requested
ild like to
3ota Heights.
�
To:
From
!�
GITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEM4
Mayor, City Council, City mg.ni�a�
James E. Danielson
Public Warks Director
Subj ct: Bid Award - Methodist Church
Job No. $61Q
Tmprovement No. $6, Froject No. 2,
DISCUSSION:
June ZS, 1986
�On June 19, i986, staff opened bids far the United Methodist Chu
praj ct. Three bids were received as fallows:
Contractor
Crossings, Inc.
Ro-Sa Contracting Ca.
Orfei & Sons, Inc.
ENGINEERS' ESTIMATE
Bid
$99,270.00
97,780.00
91,177.Q7
:• i�1 i!
The bids came in 6% over estimate this time, however staff stil i feels
tha it is a good bid and recommends awarding the contract. We feel the
ove estimate bid can be explained by three factors;
1. Staff had lowered this estimate somewhat to reflect the lower bids
tha had been coming in on previous projects.
2. This is the middle of a very busy constructian year and r►tost of
the contractors are already committed on other jobs. We only got three
bid ers, not the usual fierce competitian we saw in the eariy contraets let.
� 3. This is a sma11 job and quite often the bids come in highe� than
exp cted on smaller jobs.
TION :
Staff feels the contractor is excellent and the bid is acceptable,
and that the contract he awarded to the low bidder Orfei & Sans f or their
bid of $ 91,177.07. �
ACT ON REQUIRED:
If Cauncil desires to implement the staff recommendation, they
pas a motion adopting Resolution 86- {RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BI
AWA DING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUC'TION OF SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAIN, S
SE� R AND STREE`T IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ST. PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST
AND ADJACENT AREAS {IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 2)},
auld
AND
URCH
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst day of
July 1986.
� CITY COUNCIL
' • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
" By
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk - - ` �.•`�_
. s
- /�
, � . - �/
1�
MEMO
J
To: Mayor, City Council, and City�i��tihator
From: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director
Sub�ect: North End Street Construction
Discussion
Municipal State Aid (MSA) had notified the City that they I
variance that would again allow for MSA participation in the Nc
pro�ect. So at the June 16, 1986 meeting the City Council corn
public hearing to consider the scope of the pro�ect before awai
As a result of questians that arose from that meeting, there wi
that staff was directed ta study and repart back to the Counci;
meeting:
I. Road Aliqnment
27, 1986
ad granted a
rth End Street
ucted an informal
ding a contract.
re two issues
on at the July 1
Ms. Louella Smith, 1035 Chippewa, was at the meeting. Her�lot is the most
seriously affected lot by the new alignment of Chippewa Avenue. Chippewa Avenue
wauld be 9'+ closer to her hame after construction, leaving it�about 27 feet
from the curb line at its closest point.
An alternative solutian was braught forward at the meetingjand staff was
directed to investigate its feasibility along with any other a'lternatives that
might be implemented ta mave the alignment of Chipppewa farther from Ms.
Smith's house. Staff has campleted three alternative alignments. They all
involve "S" curves tsee attached drawings). I
I have submitted the drawings ta State Aid and althaugh th�ey would not give
me a final answer, they gave me an off the cuff answer that al'though the "S"
curves would nat be the best solution, they could be approved.� They stated
that alternate "D" appeared to be the best of the "S" curve solutions.
The "S" curve plan does have negative aspects and I have listed below the
ones I can think of: �
a. Reduced sight distances north from Ellen because
in place.
b. A number of trees would be last� 5-6 evergreens
large cottonwood.
evergreens left ,
possibly one
c. Driveways on the north side will have to be extended to meet the new
road alignment and maintaining drainage for them is going to be
difficult. �
1
d. Drivers have a tendency to straighten aut "S" curves, cross the
center line,�when they drive through them. �
e. The new alignment will add an estimated �19,000.00 to the cost of
the pro�ect.
II. Starm Sewer Alonn TH 13
Mr Richard Koscielak, 576 Sibley, and Mr. Kasheimer, 568 Fremont, who live
along TH 13 between Garden and Fremont were at the meeting to protest the storm
sewer design. They requested that the storm sewer be cantinued underground from
Garden where�it presently is planned to empty into an open ditch flowing north
ta Fremont. They allege�that without storm pipe construction along TH 13 they
receive no benefit from the storm pro�ect. They feel that the pro�ect would
even warsen their already bad storm drainage situation.
Staff has investigTated making that connection and estimates that the cost of
the constructian would be about �18,000.00. This would raise the area storm
sewer assessment from �.09 to �.11 per square foot for the entire pro�ect.
Mr. Koscielak called me since the meeting and asked that I also investigate
lining the ditch instead af extending the storm sewer.
Costs far lining the ditch with bituminous are estimated to be �2500.00.
Some options for dealing with this storm water problem are:
1. Keep the plan as it is and delete or reduce these two homeowners
storm sewer assessments.
2: Keep the plan as it is and assess them the planned amount, taking a
chance on them not contesting their assessment.
r
3. Change the plans to include the storm pipe along TH 13 from Garden
Lane ta Fremont Avenue and increase the total pro�ect assessment by
�.02/sq. ft. ,
4. Line the ditch with bituminous and keep the assessment at about the
�. 09 level.
Recommendation
Staff continues to believe that Alternate A is the best alignment for
Ghippewa Avenue, however if an "S" curve is desired to help Ms. Smith,
Alternate D should be selected.
Staff further believes that the extra casts involved to extend storm sewer
along TH 13 ta help those two homeowners are not warranted.
Action Required
Review the alternatives and make a final determination on the scope of the
North End Street pro�ect. Council neglected to adopt the Resolution Holding the
State Harmless for granting the City a variance last meeting so the state,
although they have finished their review of aur plans, will not approve them
until they receive that resalution. Council should therefore pass a motion
2
opting Resolution 86-
R GRANTING THE CITY OF
opting Resolution 86-
ving for their low bid
nicipal State Aid.
RESOLUTION HDLDING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA HARMLESS
MENDOTA HEIGHTS A VARIANCE, and then pass a motion
and award the Construction Contrac,t toi Pine Bend
of �293,689.94 sub�ect to the approval f;rom
3
ti
� ,�` i�
�
t
_ _ _..��ti
�� ------
i
' � cwu
4I •I �
1 nN
� _��
� , S,
i � . ,s-.
�
� ,,,
I �
.
� \ oz -------
•� � ;.
I � /
i
� I i�
1 I ' t -
� t� I �� .-s/
i -} � si
. � I �
� � PZ
- I � !� .si
� I
i � ,oz
( \
��. �
� tf, ----- ----- —•
� ''�� -
r
[�i '_ __. _ _ _ _ __
r /�/ / ' '
//
� z 6�
� 4
�` �^. ,
. \
� `\
/ � \ � � --
I� � -♦
� �/ ^ \\ � i�/�
r
4
J
ELL.�'1�
•�s�
IL
��
�
SZ.
5��9 I d�•t►�
.$
h
�
I � , �
.a
I ,� o `�, i � sr �
� — • . i ,sr
` I 1 �O/
I�--- - - - ' � \ ,oL
- � - - - — - - - ^ - � 1
� � � �.S/
� �� — — —
I i , � ° � ,�. ;
� i � \� s� �
� - - - -- - � ' '���/'
---- � I -; � PZ
� — � ' � %' � .si
� , � �
° i � ,oa
�
� I v� ?� �--- ------
� � � ,
� /'�C ��o• � , �' -
I , . ,-----------
, - .
, - ,
I - ' '
,��A° � � � z•6�
I� a
i / • ��•
� ' �� � �
.
�
I �.; / �� `
, , .
� �. �
aV � / � i � O _ �; — —.
b `
�
o O � ��
a �
� 1 ,°
_ 2� �
.
�. � � �.
/</, � s. 4�
v r �
I�
. �
� M1
�
�
--- —� I�—
�L
, o
sEa
SF•Lt/
N
ao
0
h
,.
I \
M \
�
\
i�
S \`-c
z•6�
r
Si•Lt /
L�
a
�
MEMO
J
To: Mayor, City Cauncil,f and City A� or
From: James E. Danielson
Sub�ect: Bream Homes - Subdivision Hearing
Case 86-11
Discussion
The public hearing considering this subdivision was contin
June 16th meeting to allaw the developer time to investigate w
pra�ect would still be viable without the requested apartments
Staff has contacted Mr. Howard Bream and he is ready to di
with Council again at this meeting. He indicated that the pro
viable without the apartments. �
Action Required ,
Reapen the public hearing scheduled far 8:0m p.m. and disc�
development aptions with Mr. Bream.
27, 1986
d from the
ther or nat his
ncluded.
uss his proposal
sal is not
the
:�
�
con�
�n.,,(,�i • -
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-
RESOLUTION APPROVING BREAM HOMFS INC. PLANNED UNIT D
WHEREAS, Bream Homes, Inc. has applied for a Conditional Use Pe'rmit to
�ruct a Planned Unit Development consisting of 34 single family homes and 106
�ertt—anits to be located within the Mendakota Estates Plat; and�
WHEREAS, such Planned Unit Development will be staged over two �hases of
con truction; the 34 single family homes to be completed now by Bream Homes, Inc.
and the apartment development to be completed later by another deve ioper, yet
unk own. I
0
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
ota Heights, Minnesota, that the Conditional Use Permit for Bre�
ned Unit Development be approved subject to the following condit
1- I Y� � �- � ��.
a • a�.,l�.�._. �„�. -�-� 3 � �-- � � `�. r��`'"�
3. �..a'-�i� -�7` � �' � ! o. S �.
.� � �o� ,��.�.�...�. ,
Ad�pted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this
19 6.
a
:hleen M. Swanson, City
�
erk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
:
Robert G. Lockwood
�
1
1
City of
Homes, Inc.
ons:
,
0
MEMO
June;
Ta: Mayor, City Council, and City A i��or
Fram: James E. Danielson, Public Wo s Director
Sub�ect: Knollmaier, Conditional Use Permit far Fence
Case 86-17
Discussion
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing ta con
Use Permit for a 46 inch high fence on a through lot at their
There was no public at the meeting for camments.
Recammendation
27, 1986
�:
a Condi�ional
meeting.
The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend granting the permit sub�ect
to the applicant removing the fabric sectian of their split rail fence on or
before 1990. Commissianer Henning voted against the recommendation, only
because he was opposed to the stipulation that required the ap�licant ta remove
the fabric.
Actiori Re4uired
Canduct a public hearing and if council wishes to implement the Planning
Commissian recommendation, they should pass a motion approving=the Conditional
Use Permit to Lot 8, Block 2 Lexington Highland West sub�ect to the applicant
removing the fabric portion of the fence before 2990. � j
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
0
NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �
June �25., 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will
meet at $:45 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, Ju1y 1, 1986, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, to consider an application from Mr. and Mrs. Paul Knollmaier for
a conditional use permit to install a 46 inch high fence along their rear yard
facing Lexington Avenue, at 1090 West Circle Ct., otherwise known as Lot 8,
Block 2, Lexington Highland West.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the conditional use permit
will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson '
City Clerk
' T' c'vTM .S�?�..i:,"x�L�°. ,..; .tMa. , e �,n� +-� • � _ . �
'�;� ��� � 't• - {: V '�" • _.L�_ '� •.'-e,�$."s'-'. ,.�sg.. „ .r;-�.wn,Y: _ 'y"t . � ». %�. "`c.-vN,.r r�
n io �.,•^c;.,qr:�r -:t�,�:. , 'a ,..'. '- .''�-. :.. �Yw� ,`. ..,.. . y�'..' �.� , _ ` . , r�{"`# . ��:6!+:
,�. . „ ,[.---. ''r��rJ ��� .:w.; ..a:.-�.:.,f� ^ , t�t'.,,;�,:;�,°a.;a . ^'�• *:Y. ^ �. . ' - „ 'h..i;��.si°r.: k
•. . d•- r,-
�: , . . .. . . . � �i.! � „ ^ ±' �.'.
3; . . � , . � � . . . _� , :" " , . � ' ,. , Case No. EJ �, � -
-� �• �f , .. . •_ . • � '_
•F .. � r " . • � .i. - .. � .�� . M Y .... ' ,, ` I r . `. F�-y,
�� ' � � _ : � " CITY OF. MENDOTA H�IGHTS . � '" . '
.- ,-,- .. . , _ - • , . �„� DAKOTA C4UNZ"1, MZNNESOTA, .. -z: ;��:,:,.:,�.�'. � . _ - `. . , . . '; i
�;.; . . . � . . »�' � _ � . . ..,, .�, . . , . h - ` .. .i? , . � ., ;:� - _ -. , - ` _
• . " < < ' APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION ` � ...A ^..; ; _;-, <f ' � . ..- ' . , ,.
• � _ _ . . . , t . _ ..._.;� ...•. •:,..�....;.; . OF '_-,.., ,. ..r... � � . . _ � , , ' ' ..., . , .. •
- ' . . -' � , . � . . , • PLANNING REQI3EST � ' . � ' : �. . " �:f�._ . . , ;
_ ,i si f4..s� .iF.J .
.:. � �` ..' .. � � . t;i.... . ' _i, y �...�.x ».:y' i, . .. . �.. . . ,t' - .l•,j.y`t � . .` -.�r % . ;_ r�—��i. „- `,,c �'
��„-_ ..: ,;., � " �. .. ' . - ' - ' .,;Date;; ofx Ap.plicati"on��. � 'i'� ,
: � '.�,,,.��: Y.. .. ., .. , . . .c�- ,.�.: . . — . • ' ' ` "� . . _ '""��
;; '�,w '`, _ : . . . , , „ Fee.=Paid- /.57). . �... . ..
;'"�.Applica 't. � " ' , ':' " ` . ` -. 'r, , .. � . - _ „ ,
`°��.,1,O�L � #�r2 .`� . -. ; ' . � ft' � • .f ' � . . > _� i �.,+ ,;,. ,. . '
: ; � s Name: ..�,, .. : '� w� � �, .` ; _ „ .,,'- ;
�.,; ri�t� M f �ta�,`.� :`� ;�`' � �� _ . . ry.
`��°` � ^�� :Las r' 3�:�" '.�.��r� '"'... G 'r a � " .,x�'11t13�. . - >. ,, .yt`•,: a°-. �.H c ':1„
. ., , . �, �.,.,. , ;r 4Firs ,.x: ... �``''� .
.yt - n. , ssri- '�-:r� _ ' .:z�w�va�a�;si:�^..`�:. � i� .i� a ,:4• :t'� �v•x•a * .u> �a �i��'_ t+. 'a.�fi:'�^."rfi'__� '?.� :
� `�t� , .' � -. - '� , ,._'x . �_ � • y., {�, "f
- ,. . - ��.aar ��5:`r>-1`o:��.='�����hl:��.<�l G�.� �c";r' � �+��:�tor �j=• ."N��l.r/�'is, =i�=ii�`��'l�%P : . ,
;` - °:;� �: � Numiier;&._"S�reet ��:< ;�..-- ,�., '� ..,Ci� - - �,:;; `:�� - .... �`Zi •.
..e:"S._;si','s: i; �� �+�z �-, . - . rc`. . =-',ia:cf`.;,,.. y„•�r.':� ;.' i; �.t„ ;�r�,,}- ��3tea;.--:f, ; z�.: `-�:. ,. �;�_ ,
Y,. .. �, _ , . .. , . ...- :r • .. ; �i",..,'.` .;>'
'^,� �'~ • � a f�' . - M'"� .. ,. x' ' " , ' t .+ , . ; ` �. , .:t � ',+�E� L - �' .. �Ih„ . � ..
,+']j} 5.' 'fi•
_ , � •�Teie hone'''Number:a:''Y�`7'�Y��% d� ., � '_� . ' . , ,' .. � - ,`; ' _'3. '� =#:�#. ��-_ ,�'`~� .
� - c, .. . - - ' - s'� - .x ;; . . ,. . . _ .�..: x.'.' - ,
. �^• �' .-:.;• _ ,. . �;.:,,- �'_ .,,�r..,
�^�ia . - ' .. �•x,.s+s ;y µ,t„ �.� yF�A;r .. � SF _. � .`.. '. - ::1-. . , .. - '•' ` }:�~i�.�x%i•�` ,
;:° ��LJL1E'i . ' - "- ,:'te'� + y. � , a.: , , /`� "'`5 L• a;� _ . < .y r ` , . t,:, .
�-ir' X �3R22:�" ''j� +3�,•t.• ' y • . - . . ,- `C3ri - '". _ • - ,_ y'i,:�' =:r.,r,'.�, •
" �t�:3 L� c�.l;`l�:'6�� j `�1'��..� ;. �t�t..� l._.� � � ; ..,k`" �..��., _,.
��:' . • : ', � Last ' � • : ` First ' - '�, . Iriitial'�j ,. , ., �.4:. �.}'
' . :f �' � • � , • . ... . .. ' - , . �. � ,'' .
„�.aar��s t 09n � ��• G► �;�i � t".�7' . -.� m�1�..1 ���c� l�� l C�/ �"S, '�'��cl ,SS'Jl�' . r
'� . ' .. � , ` Number & Street City � ' ' S�ate � Zip ' . , •
'';.'. , Street.: acat3.on�.of','Proper,ty ='in'QuesCion; - . ,"= �.�.: -..�- ' ,_ . �� , . . . "
- • . . � - :rc.. -^'Si:- uj .�1 ,� � {- : - _ . . � -
� . t� . 1, , r j� :�, - � - r� o �J� �:) G� H7"S 1 �.l .��'�11,.� � . �
s. � t .... • iy . � � ^ v ,. . , _ � ' � , �
'_;� ' Legal�" e�scri.ption+` of�`�Property: ' �_;'.:;.:"•�'. ' " _ .. ', _ '�, . ,.: ' ''� - r�
,�f � - �' < _ �: _ .k' ` . , „1 �. . , ' , a , ` . '{ ; '
_ , . j�- �. ,. .�:_�oe� � ���: �� C.r,a,� �� rt�D- �� . .
- ��
ii .
r `.
�. . , _; + : ., ,
Type o
_, ��..�. .. � . � .. � , - .
i• - � ..3 c• `,S~. .... i • , , � ' ' ^ > �t�,f;a� s ••S � � •
d' ���'f''�"'i,^_� } . ''S. . , �. . � .. _ _ _ , r . _ , .. -� �1
, . . • ri �;' ,. „ . . ._
".,�r+L Y r :.nr�i. ,r . �_ ' . � x .. �I `Y� • . � F w . , LL . ��:�
' . -. ,y F ' ':�.3},. .w._ . . . . - '►k: " "fi.'�t' t„_,�`�zs y'„ i._ rs. a '.c � . ,
' ' ' »1 4 s't4 : } �'.: )•• +i <
.. ., �:X . ..�. `. � ; .«�ey�.w r:.y. ...... • ` • `A, v • •�°.• � ,t• ., s .. . � + �,•� �
Request. , - Rezoning . . ' . .. � .
, . . . ' � r° : . .. _. : Variance . , �_ ' ' ` ' ,
- - � - � , � `.y�� Canditiana`1 •Use. Pe�rmi.t �
� ` . • � - Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D
` -� •� - `, - • � �- � � • � riinor Conditional Usey Permit
, ., .._ __. _ .. .. .. - Subdivision App�'oval �
. . . � `• • . ��°' . ' Pl�n Aplproval � . .., ; , .
. , _ . , ,�, ; _,� GTeClands Permit • � . ,
OCher �
I, '�.� ��} • •
� �
• • � a � � ~ ; �� -�'+S � ✓ ,
• . ' • � . ' . � %" ' ~ ;!'�` , . � .
' ', .
,�. . .. i . ... i. . .
, ` . r , � c •
• � 4. �t _, t Y
� `
' � r } r
� �
• . . � .
�
C
�r • • ....�..-w.—...�..-.�,......�-v.,.i..:,.. .-......__...._, ....... " ",.... � . . .«....--�M.�..-w........w�.�l.. , .
, �, • �.. " 1�.. � i� � i � T ����� �.. ,��.� � �" [: j � � ��� �� , ,,• f � t -
' , , A t►�.'A D tJ:�.�.t� J�� - ,t�.l�.��A y'T CiN .' � ' ' � �_ �'� • • -
-:.. ' � �
�; , ' . � ,, . .d.F:�,.,.y,.• - -.:,. :: � '- . � � _
. � - . , - z..ra r� e��. ��z�i,��.�...�;, ���.��nratr� =�:j:�;� . . . .
.. - .. . =.�+ ► ����:�►��c� t+�r�s�r; `:a��►�;�:ia►�����v • . � �_� � . .
.�: � � � ' � ..� z Y • i,y;L 5,�. ' � � , - • j t)
� . f, �.r . ; �� . . • � � 1
.�
,Y� 4_ � :t� � � �: f.� f TT � � , * T , .
;. - ::.•r . - " - . � ��t; � .,�`� � � - � _
�: "r�: . . --t :��;'�'�8'„� . . , , . . . , _ - .,
�' i" th• � + . y, ( �^ � . . � . .
.. . t ` �y� + •�r.r �'� w+F . t� a.
',,j;' . I.:�'+��i � • 4 , `,~ ?{M�tAs' ' ' � � � -� � ~ _ '
, , .r� • :: �1 �I' ` �� � .IOQ�}, , T • . .. _ / ~ 1
Y� { } ✓ �
• : � �SO.00 �: '� . � i:, a d �' �- �i � � � . . .
I � `�. ' 't�: i�. D., �.` - �'tjr . . ' i� / G / � C �.a � ' + . �« '' .
I � ''1�5��`,Z.. �� � /w • `�1 }
. > ', � _ _ .. �r.�.�t��". ,�°{ • � - � � �r t� :. �'} t�d R '�" , .
..•t. , •_ r i w • � � • r• h��:..„,4.�i s � j' �. � ,� ' -
. .r' � • ` , � �;�„ ' yy���'' ,;�•N ;' -- �, - , - . .
. f � �� � ` `I . ;- I � ,��y� � �� � ' t !� ''` - '.p t
� �! f J -�,+� � , ' �f � * � '
t � .• i � ! � � ' .��'�+�� � i � 4 � � •� �„ l�� M � • / � � '��aM�� _ . . .
. i �•
I�, ' ` ... •t '�j ,8 ' , ' y • ` ' � .
fl � . >_ � `�. ` i'Ma yr�.. , ^'" , . , .
�`#: - . . t� ,_.', `. y�40dPt : �. , � - +'• ' �" "�-�-----�"'•��� - •� . � �
.- { � ' , ` i, r - ;�': r`F`"` Ef:».IG2.�"•# t ' .�_" : + ' `.Ssr.7f�y ' t ' t
,ti�'.s ,_+ . -.� • i , • y. • «� ', - + ' I i
t!i �� �
t �: . �> `' �4�00----� ��,7�� M ' � . ' t ' - �
• +'1 f` '�„` ` - � "�iC% .w; �F' - t $- O 4 .g+I��tD � � � '- _ . ' �' ' i
'.� ,�-,.,'.},�. ` . ; ' {: , �;�. , �8y.0o y- . . . ` i � . ,- :
-�' � � �.,�a. ;.r. -� . � � �``:_._...�: � . i
' _ r'• .� _ �iy � ' ��5�::�: �- .� .��� 1 - ��'� .�: . . .. . � , +
�- � Iri' - J� . , .
x'� -,wz.�;�. �
! �:�': ' :r• : ' �s • , .
.� �;; - � : . ., .. _ .. ..
_ ,,� ,rv. , �.. ,; . � � rx z, �a���r sri� .� .� �°' ..
� � • .:"�. , ,.�. ,(�j.�r�rvi�..} • � , .
< � �. _ ";�, . . .
� ' ;, ...,� * �y �,� 9,�,, y ;
,• � .�'•'"� . + ... • �r' i- ' > ' t
_ . �; .-� . � � -. � �� ��, . � � ' . �
;-- • � ' t�`` 9is��r� . � i
. r : � — — — -- — - - rnd i ca#� �.s �c.nc�. .
#, .r. � . . . I
. :�, � � 9% : �XfS /N G�Q(Jhl D • -
. j �,�t. �rtir�c,a � � K,EY .
d . , � Od s s,�'_ �.,�£x�s sv �rG G,R� r
.. ` � - , . � . y��' '� n2cx�as�v 6��E �
' ' � . . . �� .
' � ' ,� .r.. , __ ....-.-� - •-._ -' .
• ' � - � _. _ ..r--._..._--------�-""'""`_ .
r �, �f �.,2! . '
, � - ',
, ' ± {rs�i�rcac. ,
� � hrtr+�y :errttv ;'':-,t thu; ��rt'+rC'T. ��+tte
s , :.•i,,t�r� u:�s s,r��:►sc�.i hv mc- or ur.:ict
r .f+rr; i .41t�."Ct'tSS��?� :�:� chat [ •crs �t �
� t:..i�a.L'.f<'4` � �i'q,i �UCS'Cjfl� '11,�1C�C1" i� �,r"SU�!
�' �t: �:ncr :yf �lcnclt:s�>t3.
. ! � �'.�"�..zC�..�..� �-� � ,��..
� t3oce_ S�c�_i$� i�a:. Na. ,-.,� �-3
• _... _.. .._.. ....,..__...._•_ _ - �--• � --- . i ....__._.....,.. �.. .. , _ .. _ . _.._. .� _,..... . _
G, �. L�A�'�L.�i��: At �!' A�55fa�.".. .
�7N3 .�'itiRi(JO'P� ��Q�l'�.
� T. RA U� �#`h} . 5��3 p 5
,:�cti�.� : � ��►cN � 3a���,�.'r` .
�'} A ?' � � h�'�",. L�tlT,: 2,4;,'' �*.3�" < '"
.... .^ ._..... ".. ...,. .. �...�� +' _-....-:.�.�.;.,,.,:�..,
._ C F R T i�� C�'?'' �. C�! F' ��tJ����'
LOT 8, t3�.�CN ,a�� 4�Xi��"�JN '
N� b�jC�4N� Y1J EST= �, ti`�` f��`. .. �
,: r �`� v�. ..., . _ _. �
FOR: PAt��. YN..�Q:�1VCAt! �'fi . .'
Idd6 7�71ST � Q Y T'A Y� Sf ���� M�E.
. ..,......�....._..._......_.._.�_..�.....__ . -._.�.. �+.., .
AN�IING REPORT
TE:
SE NUMBER:
�LICANT:
�ATION:
TION REGIUESTEO:
�I�YVII�G CONSIDERATIONS:
24 June 1986
E:I•��l
Paul J. Knollmaier
Southwesterly of
Circle Court Cul
sketch)
Approval of a Cond
Permit for Fence L
l. Section 3.2(64) describes a through lot as "a lot which has
opposite lot lines abutting two (2) substantially parallel s
which is not a corner lat. On a through lot, both street lin�
front lot lines for applying this ordinance." Such through
occur where single-family residential lots front on a cul-de-sac
up to a major thoroughfare, where the rear yard is contic
heavily travelled street not desirable for single-family lot
This means that buildings must be setback 30 feet from the
and the major thoroughfare, and that fences greater than 30
height require a conditional use permit to be placed within :
either street right-of-way.
2. Such is the case for the property in question owned
Paul Knollmaier. The reason that fences over 30
require a conditional use permit is that, in some cases,
are contiguous to other homes where the major tho
front yard. In the'se cases, the restriction of higher
appropriate.
by Mi
inches
these
f
In some cases, lots across the street may be fronting on
thoroughfare so that the rear yard of the through !ot may
the environment in such canditions. This is more often the
the through lot fronts on two minor streets and where a h:
might intrude on the "residential character" of the area. '
theory about what happens in the first 30 feet of a lot co
the street is that in single-family residential areas we are atl
maintain a corridor of openness, approximately 120 feet in wi
feet of this width is usually the public right-of-way and the
60 feet is divided into two front yards contiguous to the sti
is why the side yarda contiguous to a street on the corner
the same 30 foot setbacks as front yards. That is why, wh
lot line is contiguaus to a side lot line of a contiguous loi
higher fences (6 feet) are to be back 30 feet from
right-of-way.
West
(see
nal Use
a pair of
reets and
; shall be
�ots often
but back
ious to a
frontage.
cul-de-sac
inches in
D feet of
and Mrs.
in height
rear yards
re is the
s may be
the major
impact on
ase where
�her fence
he overall
tiguous to
;mpting to
th. Sixty
remaining
;et. That
ot require
re a rear
that the
he public
PAUL J. KNOLLMAIER, CASE 8617 Page 2
. 3. Thus, in the case of building fences higher than 30 inches in the rear
yard where it is contiguous to a major thoroughfare, such as Lexington
Avenue, the allowance for a fence higher than 30 inches is reasonable,
if the design does not represent an awkward intrusion into the open
space. In this case, a 46 inch high split rail cedar fence, consisting of
three horizontal rails is proposed. Such a fence tends to define a
boundary, but not create a visual screen. This residential character
may well enhance the view from the street.
4. The Knollmaiers inform us that for a period of at least two years they
would like to add green vinyl mesh attached to the inside of the fence
• so as to restrict the movements of their youngest three y,ear old
daughter. The conditional use permit could limit the use of this
material for a specified period of time, if the Planning Commission and
Council consider it appropriate to do so.
5. The Knollmaiers have purchased the fencing materiel and have begun �the
construction when they were made aware of the ordinance regulations. ,
They have submitted statements of approval from neighbors, as attached.
6. You will note from examination of the location map attached that the .
rear yard in question is across Lexington Avenue from the City's ;
proposed Civic Center site at the northwest corner of Lexington and ;
Trunk Highway 36. Thus, there is no single-family residential frontage �
across the street from the rear yard where the fence is proposed to be
constructed. It is also useful to know that the height of a fence is ',
measured to the top of the horizontal rail, if the posts do not exceed �
6 inches in height. In other words, the height is measured 6 inches
below the top of the post or to the height of the top rail (or material
between the posts), whichever is greater.
_ � `I}� • _� ;��{ •_ . � . . � i
.!Z" . f ' •..lJ ^ v . �� i � .i . .. - I 1
�•7. .:t' •�• • : i� 1
�`c'. • • • �
.� , � /�
_--� , - ���.. .._ .. . _ ,. :� �' --� ,
__ �y _ _:,..�• 1 ,,�. ��` '� . .� , �
_ ,:.t,;:� �_ � ��'�' ' i 'l . �.'�r. . . � , : /'
MARIf 1r � � ,
- •.t.: •I• AVENUE F- -- � � � ' ,
..i•,' � PANK � / I
�� '�� � i
1'1 . i .- -- •i •. • i - - _ � ' I
:. � 1 � �� .
..'I � j
. 'i � • � • � • � �. •"A • • � � — �
� w u =u
•i j ' �?1 � .! j � w� � �� � :
� � �! " � ♦ - , • �--;�w � xv ; i
-+---r� � x� "
• • ; �,� : ,+
.��• �%� M :\ � � � � • i i ;�I�f '
. � �. • � � � � � _�— �� � , � �, �
� �
,•�- � 1 � • wrr� • • � /�� � � .
� • • • • �_ �.� ,I��:
• ♦ • • • e .. i
j� � � eo� • /
• _ . 1 • � • ' w �- yi
S � ._ . • . . �.
�w ,
r[.00r� «!r(MIM � • � • � >., stu � � j
� � SCALE "- 00' �� ���� • • ' �� � �
. • � . w '
-. : . � � �� � �� � .
. • � � � .
� ' •
. � .
. � � �
� . . . �� �\ ,� ,, -
. � .
• � ' ' � ' -
. avic / i c�"
J ' -
J • / • •
•� J , T 1 _
•
W • / �� • , / I •
� � . . _ i ' -
:
b � � , _ ��. . • ' ,��'�%� � � _
�_
S �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 25, 1986
To
Frdm:
Mayor, City Council, City m�ni�a�
✓ �
James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
Sub'ect: Bid Award - Methodist Church
Job No. 8610
Improvement No. 86, Project No. 2.
DIS�USSION:
On June 19, 1986, staff opened bids for the United Methodist Church
pro ect. Three bids were received as follows: I
Contractor
Crossings, Inc.
Ro-So Contracting Co.
Orfei & Sons, Inc.
ENGINEERS' ESTIMATE
Bid
$99,270.00
97,780.00
91,177.07
:. 11 1 1 �
The bids came in 6% over estimate this time, however staff still�feels
that it is a good bid and recommends awarding the contract. We feel the
over estimate bid can be explained by three factors;
1. Staff had lowered this estimate somewhat to reflect the lower.bids
that ad been coming in on previous projects.
2. This is the middle of a very busy construction year and most of
the c ntractors are already committed on other jobs. We only got three
bidde s, not the usual fierce competition we saw in the early contracts let.
�3. This is a small job and quite often the bids come in higher
expec ed on smaller jobs.
RECONIl�IIENDAT ION :
Staff feels the contractor is excellent and the bid is acceptabl'e,
and th t the contract be awarded to the low bidder Orfei & Sons f or their
bid of $ 91,177.07. �
ACTIONIREQUIRED:
I Council desires to implement the staff recommendation, they sho
pass a motion adopting Resolution 86- (RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS A
AWARDI G CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAIN, STORM
SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ST. PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHUR
AND ADJ CENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 2)).
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRU
OF SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATERMAIN AND STREET IMPROVE
TO SERVE ST. PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PROPERTY AND ADJ
AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 2).
WHER AS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the proposed const
of nitary sewer, improvements to serve property and adjacent areas
impr vements have hereto fore been known and designated as Improvemen
No. 6, Project No. 2), bids were received opened and tabulated accor
to 1 w and the following bids were received complying with said adver
ment•
NAME IOF BIDDER
Cross�ngs, Inc.
Prior Lake, MN
Ro-So Constracting
Cente ville, MN
Orfei & Sons, Inc.
St. P ul, NIIV
and
AMOUNT OF BID
$ 99,270.00
97,780.00
91,177.07
uct io n
which
ing
ise-
WHEREA , the City Engineer recommended that the low bid submitted by Orfei &
Sons, t. Paul, Minnesota, be accepted, I
NOW TH�REFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendot Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
1. T � t the bid of Orfei & Sons, of St. Paul, Minnesota, submitted for'the
co struction of the above described improvments be and the same is
he eby accepted.
2. Th t the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute
an deliver any and all contracts and documents necessary to consiat
th awarding of said bids.
Adopted by the City Council of the Ci�y of Mendota Heights this lst day of
July 198b.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Rabert G. Lackwaod, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
. . "Mr 1
u
Kevin Frazell, City Coordinator
bers of Mendota Heights Planning Conenission
bers of Mendota Heights City Council
Sirs:
May 31, 1986
We are nei�hbors of Paul and Jodie Knollmaier. We firmly support
th ir effort to obtain a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 46-inch
sp it-rail cedar fence (lined in green vinyl mesh) along the back and
si e peripheries of their lot at 1090 West Circle Court. The fence
e ances the property, provides an attractive backdrop to their home,
an is necessary for the safety of their three small children. (The
ba l: of their lot faces heavily travelled S. Lexington Ave.)
In addition, we support their attempt to secure a Conditional Use
De it fee reduction, since we believe the ordinance in question was
n� er intended to be applied to a situation such as tneir's. I
In conclusion. we enthusiastically petition that the Knollmaier's
ae granted, expeditiously, a Conditional Use P�rmit to construct a�
fe ce. And, that they are granted a C[JP fee reduction.
�
Respectfully,
�
jyours,
I
rli `-�=��
: ;At
June 2, 1986
�
n: Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Coordinator
Members of Mendota Heigh�s Planning Cor[gnission
Members of M�n�ota Heights City Council
De r Sirs: -
We own the home next door to Paul and Jodie Knollmaier.
We enthusias�ically support their effort to obtain a Conditional
Us Permit to construct a 46-inch cedar split-rail fence (lined
in green vinyl mesh) around the back and side boundaries of their
lo .
Their lot baGcs up to South I�YinUton Ave. - a very busy,
� vily travelled street. A fence is vital to.the safety of
� ir children, as well as our tW0 small children, since they
` en play together. � ,
The fence design that the Knollmaier's propose is attractive
i in no s,ray deters from the standards of the subdivision.
In addition, we support the efforts of Paul and Jodie to
� ure a Conditional Us2 Pe�it fee reduction.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully yours,
Tom a,�d Carol Andretr,
1088 W. Circle Ct.
Mendota Heights, MIV
e
118
a
Sunr� 1�� 19 8 b.
Whom It May Concern:
W� are neighbor� af Pau2 and Jodie Knallmaier. We�
u ders�and that there i� �ome cancern about �he appropriate-
n�zs and/or ae�thetias of their new �pli� rail fence. �
We can t�ee their fence from our front yard, We �ee
i when we approach our devalapment from Lexington Avenue.
W are of th� opinlon that it enhancet�, ra�her than detracts
f am, the beauty of our neighborhaod. �
The fence also has utilitarian value as a deterrent to'
n ighborhood children, {our,� included,} from racing onta� �
L xington Avenus. . .
The combinatian of i�:� a��ractivene�r� and pracstical
v lue lead u� to ,�uppart �he Knollmaier�� effort� �o ob�ain
a Permit to maintain their fence,
fTN �
.Y« . .�
. �>•_°
i � •f �� ���
� . � . �r. .� .
1
Signeds
� �.
John E. T ame�
/
.�
J n t M. Thame
7 We;�t Cirrsle C
`. •. , Menda�a`'Keightt�;�'M
urt
"=`� 55118 . .
�
, ; �. ,,. : � . • ; :.� �t.;..
.' �f_<<,= ;,..'
.. � • . .. '����' .�+.,'`�•l, � _ .. ._ . _ ..♦ .. i����w.�r� � '
•
Attf1:
�
a
f
in
fa
a
si
.... - :. .r'e:Y�d'k .H" :
� 1
.;
;
� 1090 West Circle Cou
Mendota H�ights, NIIV
` June 2, 1986
Mr. Kevin Frazell, City Coordinator
Members of Mendota Heights Planning Commission
Members of Mendota H�ights City Council
.
Sirs:
55118
We o�m a hom� at 1090 West Circle Court and are seelcing a
itional Use P�rriit to construct a fence along the back and side
pheries of our lot. Our house faces West Circle Court - a quiet,
dential cul de sac. However, our lot backs up to SouthLexington Ave. -
sy, heavily travelled street. A fenc�, therefore, is necessary�to
safety'of our three small children (ages 3, 4 and 8). �
We take pride in the.appearance of our home, our subdivision, and
city. For that reason we carefully considered what type of barrier
d provide safety for our children, while also enhancing the propert:
cedar split-rail design (lined in green vinyl mesh) that j,r� propose
s our childr�n in and safe, is consistent with the style of ourj
, and provides a•pleasant backdrop to the surrounding natural eleme:
Our neighbors are unanymous arid enthusiastic in their support
effort to o�tain a Conditional Us� P�rnit to construct this (4�
,:wr> . ,
ce. Also Planning Cori�ul:tant Ho�,rard Dahlgren has assured me of
roval, as well as t�'�a'�t oi City;Clerk Kathy S�ranson.
� ,- '
In addition, Mr. Dahlgren suggested that we seek a Conditiona.
mit fee reduction. ' The ordinancehin question was not initially
end2d for a situation such as ours -�ahere our back lot line al�
�s a street. • `��°�:�- . ,
,,. '.r '?a':`" • .
�alJ � ;
Thank you for your time and consideration. I am also sending
etter of sup�ort for our Conditional Use Permit and fee reducti�
ned by our •inany n�igh�ors. - � T • � � '
% . .
, f��� i w
^�'t'ryb:�"irr t��:�+;�`:w�R^�k'��'�+�N,:�„" ' . ' ..,,g,�,� .�^�'s
- ,�.:., . � ..� . . '..i:..aYs.. �
Y
��.
Respectfully yours
. ';�4�,
J �li�j�
,i.,�y..s�&y'+nY't't�mt''"`. .. . :t.m.w a;
Paul & Jodie Knol
�
ts.
inch)
�is
Use
i •
u/�7�-t�a----�
r"„!T':.�n>...F... .� .. :w ,....,.,:tw�r*t
aier
0
- - "� � - .
��:�} �'�`w. ','y.
• �:. `"
�r. �-����'
; i.�?:t��t�i.��ysi`,*�.':.
��i
; =m�. 3,,�i,LQ �j.'.
"Y"'p�� ""� CITY OF ME[�TDOTA HEIGH'fS
. y�`.� �`�
:2„= ''�;j'�.�.n° MEMO
' ``";`';���``��` June 17, 1986
�: � �. �
,'i � A.�r `Pj.
T0: n`R1aRn�ng Commission
, ,;A ;;�:t�ys,:.
FROM.i�'�James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
.A�'l_ �:'i:..:f.:(
.'''=�Putr•Tic Works Director . Code Enforcement Officer
..+ii � �`��!TJ..1.Sr
SUBJECT:�:��"'�Case No. 86-17, Knollmaier, Conditional Use Permit
:,..
�. •y. _
r. . �.tGL �r �Yi' ,
DISCUSS,LON; �,
sp 1 �i�=-
staf f.
a peri
asked;
be ..is;
benef-:
m
f o r,r�:
a:� �<'::r-;�;;. � •
"l:iJ=:: �T`
.. . ' �1. .
=Kn�llmaier's, who reside at 1090 West Circle Court, have constructed a'
�;:;--,.
i�:�::,fence enclosing their rear yard. While driving on Lexington Avenue,
: �..� : � . .
ticed a fence being constructed and stopped to advise the homeowner that
;°mi�st be acquired prior to the installation_ of that fence. Staff.�ua;7,��Q�Fy,��
:;.,�, . .
e�Yiomeowner to cease all construction until such time as a permit�-cfsu=ld'��.``
d;;'�,for the�fence. The homeowner completed the fence installation without
o��:a fence permit. ' ,
,�- :
�,��;`:� s,
"ry. �~ :.
'.�ti�oineowner has obtained statements of concurrence from their neighbors.
ing ordinance definition, through lots require a conditional use permit
in excess of 30 inches. This fence is 46 inches in height. .
.',p'a�'f^. �S'.•YJ��.
'ciMl��,y'�:;7i��"�a!rSt
e'�'4°.,'�,�}f� . .
T, i �.nlySS t
:3ti��.G'on�"duct a public hearing to consider a conditional use permit to allow a
- �' e '��`�d�
46. incH;F►igh split rail fence. Based on input from the public and commission,
move"�.��.o'���close the public hearing and make a recommendation either,approving,or,
deny�n$=�''�t�e- conditional use permit. _ ::}�" :=r
:�; .� . �Y�-�• . "�_� ,
«fy�s� 4y.�x�l. : •. '
�: �¢.,�,"'��a.4.�
��• :i 4 `�.�.�:.
. : zg; � :n:'='- :
� �.+.. �. - �h 1�
PRBf. J�Ep:� madlr
: �; . :� �<�.
. .., � ,?•
.'ti3
-? •: � �.i�1;ra; '
,'i;� ..,g.r_ i. y�_ .
- .�i's.,.��,���'g ���'L`"'^�
1 � .:^ 7r'.� .
"�'r:.`3.i.. . '`h'r*�a
. rXz . r..<.!T:...6�'ra'riw...e.�� +. �'•
.�. :¢,: ^T; , • '' . �.,:... . . , . ,
.. . . _, _ _ •�-tsr�- .�r,.c4%¢:,7i` r
TO ;
FRQM
SUBJ
req
the
the
a11
sig
hea
REC
CITY OF MENDOTA I�EIGHTS
MEMO
�
yor, Ci�y Council and City A���i%di'�`
James E. Danielsan
Public Works Director
. Dougherty Conditional 13se Permit for Fence
Case No. $6-14
ION :
June 26, I
Fences in a front yard area �.hat are in excess of 30 inches in height
re a conditional use permit with a public hearing. Staff overlo�ked
act that a gublic hearing would be needed until the last minute
fore na hearing was set. The Planning Comm�.ssa.on felt that inasmuch as
he affected neighbars had been contacted by the applicant and had
d a letter stating that they did not abject ta the fence, the public
nQ shauld be waived. �
ATION:
The Planning Commission recommends waiving the requirement for a�public
hear ng and granting the applicant the conditional use permit allawing the
�S� i C�i �?].��'i ��.'IICf:. �
REQiTIRED:
If Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission recommend
they should pass a motian waa.ving the requirement for a public hearin
gran ing the conditional use permit allowing a 60 inch high Eence wit
front yard area to Lot l, Black 5, Sammerset View.
4
�tion,
; an d
iin a
CITY OF MENDO'PA HLIGHTS
MEMO
T0: �lanning Commission
June 17, 1986
FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJE T: Case No. 86-14, Dougherty, CUP For Fence
DISCU SION
r. and Mrs. Dougherty, 1263 Delaware, have constructed a five foot chain
link ence along their south and west property lines. Staff was informed of the
, st rting of this fence construction. Upon a site visit, staff left� a message
on a ence post to halt construction until a fence permit was issued. �The
contr ctor maintains he didn't see the note and completed the entire fence
witho t permit. 9ubsequently, the homeowner made application and appl'ied for the
requi ed conditional use per mit. +
he fence is in excess of 30 inches in height (60 inches), therefore, by
zonin ordinance, a conditional use permit must be approved. �
ACT
appl:
not 1
publ.
be s
July
ing
he ordinance requires a public hearing on a conditional use permit. The
ant did not submit an abstractor's certif icate, therefore a hearing has
en called for. Staff is unclear as to whether the requirementslfor a
hearing can be waived in the instance of a conditional use permit. To
e, the Commission should call for a public hearing at their
eeting and direct Mr. ]�ougherty to submit an abstractor's certiiicate list-
1 owners within 350 feet of his property.
�
PRB/ ED:madlr.
' A
��
C.ii:)c 1c�. —_____,�" -�� �
CITY or rtrn�Do�rn xczc►►�rs
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNGSUT�
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEREITION
OF
PLANNING RF.QUL'ST
llate oE Application hlay 21, 1986
Pee Pa ici $150 . 00 /JZ� � 7
Applicant
hame: Dougherty, V�lilliam J. and Kathleen E.
I.ast First Initial
Address: 1263 Del awarP A'v�,��P P1Pnrl(l,ta }{P1�J1tS., �1RJ F5j ��
Number & Street City State Zip
Telephone Number: 4�7-6421
Owner '
Name: po �c�hQrty, 6•�i 11 i am ,] _�n�l K�t,�jl aan E
Last First Initial
Adaress: 1263 �elaware Avenue ��endota Heights, t'Ifd 55115
Number & Street City State Zip
Street LocaCion of Property in Question:
�' . . d '1 i1 ��• ■' �� 2
Legal Description oE Property:
•11' -. 1 ' 1 � 1 1 ' . �
0
Type'oE Request: ' Rezoning
Variance --
Conditional Use Permit ,
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
XX "Iinor Conditional Use Permit —
Subdivision Anproval
Plan Approval
(detlands Permit
� Other
Application is made to install a 60" 11 ga. chain link fence to
con�ain and protect a 3 year old chocolate labrador retr�iv`r show/stud
dog valued in excess of 1,000.
�
c
MEMO
June �
To: Mayar, City Council, and City nj,��tor
Fram: James E. Danielson ,
Sub�ect: Johnson - Frant Yard Setback Variance Case 86-15
?7, 1986
Discussian �
The Planning Commissian at their June meeting reviewed the Johnson variance
request (see attached reports). �
Recommendation I
The Planning Commissian unanimausly recammended to grant the three faat
frant yard setback variance. �
Action Reauired j
If the City Council wishes ta implement the Planning Commission
recammendatian, they should pass a motion approving a 3 foot frant
variance ta Lot 1, Block 1, Valley View Oak. � 1
yard setback
,
�. ; . , , �
��� � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
• . DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
� APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
.. ., �F
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. O F.�; � �J
� Date of Applicati �n � ��
' � ' � � Fee Paid ����' � -
Applican ` �_ � .
Name: ' '�JU(�'f��N 1 C � �
Last First Initial ,
. ,<. . . .. �-
Address:��G�.� 1 �-112� /FC��i� ' �PLS 1' (�% `� �/ ��b
• ,,. ,-; Number_ & Street . , City �, .State , . , Zip
Telep one Number: '.r' 72Z�- %%ZU g3 �' SS7 y .
,E a
Owner . f ;.�,,
' Name: ... . _. .k. „ ; -- '+.;5' �
Last First �Initial
Addr ss: `'- '� ``
Number & Street City State Zip
Street ocation of Property in Question:
zo � �-ti �- �Q � �
Legal° D scription' of Property: ' ' � -
- -c� ur � �w �!z . _ �
.. . � . . . .� _..- . � -- Loc�c � = - � - i
, . , j,
i'
� _-, `�
Type oflRequest:
;,:�:
= :�
Rezoning
� � Variance
e Conditional Use Permit
" Conditional Use Permit for P,.U.D.
riinor Conditional Use Permit
� • Subdivision Approval '
� Plan Approval � �
.c4irt'h' S .-r .. ;r,t,: _. �rra:,;r+ta•.k� r•�,.`4; xs7; ._. - ,l�fi"'aYT?+h'��M � %rrkd'
�, ';��. . ;z°� r� •S:,�Wetlands:.Periii�'t�`: . =�'•�":���,. ���f} �... ;
� Othert � � ' y '
- •'��'' '
._• . � � � ,�
,, ....
:
. . �.,� ;;.�. '
.. 1
CITY OF MENDOTA HGIGHTS
MEMO
June 17, 1986
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: James E. Danielson and Paul R. Berg
Public Works Director Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: Case No'. 86-15, Johnson, Variance
DISCUSSION �
Mr. Richard (Jay) Johnson, has begun construction of a house at 1920
Glenhill Road. Staff recently performed a footing inspection and noticed that
the hot tub area encroached into the required 30 foot setback. Mr. Johnson
had promised to modify his plans to bring his hot tub into compliance with the
30 foot required setback. The homeowner did not comply with that promise and
constructed the hot tub area within the setback. As of this date, the applicant
has not submitted a statement of concurrence from the adjacent neighbor.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the variance application with the applicant and move to recommend
approval o� denial of the variance.
�
PRB/JED:madlr
June �.1, 1986
City f Mendota Heights
Plann'ng Commissian
c/a M ry Ann
To Wh�m It May Concern:
R. L. Johnson
3424 Park Ter�
Minn�apolis, !
JU�
-ace
sN 554Q6
�i�
Z am aking apglication for variance on the sauthern baundary or Zot
line f Valley View Oak, Block 1., Lot 1(1920 Glenhill Road�). This is
a cor er lot with the proper�y line in question facS.ng Cull�igan Lane.
As I ave previously explained �.o members of the commission�, the
gosi ion of the primary residence in questian is wel.l within ali set
back requa,rements. The reason why the home is placed in the position
it i in now in the lot is due to the topographa.cal composi:tion of the
lat nd the passive solar aspects of the house. Ta have moved the
hous into any other position would have created a hardship in not
maxi izing the natural topographica]. aspects of the lot. Thus a great
deal of unnecessary excavating would have been required. �
The nly portion of the house that excedes the
requ'rement is the sautheast corner of the hat
carn r on],y excedes the set back by three feet
stre ch.
30' set back
tub area and this
along a nine foat
The at tub area can be reduced by the three faot leng�h ii necessary,
but t would seem that changing the original architectural intent on a
home can a property line not comman �o any other individual should not
be n cessary when a variance would be of so I.i�tle cansequence.
I ha e a lake home up north where al.l new consfi�ruction is
main ain a seventy-five �oo�. set back from the high water
lake Thi.s requa.rement is strongly enforced. However, d�
topo raphical aspects of the land, combined with appropri<
posi ianir�g of houses for both constructian reasons and a4
vari nces are granted fram a positian of common sense basf
Zagi al request. The reasons I have stated I believe are
We
Sin
R.
1.1 da w�atever you deem appropriate.
Joh,hson
equ a. r ed ta
ark of the
ta
e
thetic
upon
ocrical.
��-�
"�r�.
�O.of
ya`
�s�-�s� �
1— ` — --- -- ._. 1 �
/ ----� .�,_y
7 �
1 „ �
i / 8 ��
�utv 1 � TSt�fy
,�1-.--'�� �� `�'K� � y� __--._---- � �� �\ $,g:,
� '� `
/ �
! ,mA�ti ,�o' ( ? '
/ �
��,1 �J,.us�-�. �-- 3o r ..-.-.-."'� —.i
� Tl � �5� ��`��
z
� � Q �
�s
lso. � �
� y�` � s
1 1 `-� �
� �
I �
� � ~ } f
�
� �
30 � �� ,�(
�--_.
C 5E,- Q�� ,�
37• 78
�
�L��V���C � `�-•� ?�Z 98
�9Ci
REQu�'ST VR�.cyn�C� �aG, F�o7� T 6 �4�c&N.
�t-�+ar �ti�s �o F�- s�a-�� .���,� 3 � (M92H2t? .N 2��
! `�ZD G �.Eu f-tt c.C. l�nRd �a�'rF�:
uAL4,�+� U t4uJ QA K � AY �NNs�.�
gC.ncLc. i L.a! 1 3�(2y /H�'1'C I�/12sK2
%yl! NNRv9Pi t/j' , � r �1
SSyo6
�;.,,.
,;� ��• : � ;:,;; .
_ �..
. :�::� �. �;::
�,,;.. �;� ;:.>
;.�; ;�,�
. �� .:, ,�- ,:,�
�y::. .:y�?
.�:.yi j. �ia
� S:ivi� ,+ 1. •��
��r� f � . i :� `�f'i.
..,yf .
fiJ a;,4: ';�Ss:
. `k� I � '� �'..
.�fi;:.
<*:�.5 .�t'. . ?+-�.
lt. y.
v�l:� '�a:.
.:Y• � �� ��i
:
: ;'
«
LANf�IING REPORT
�ATE:
!-�SE NUME3ER:
PPLICANT:
OCATION:
CTION RE(�UESTED:
�IW�IIIVG CONSIDERATIONS:
24 June 1986
8615
J. L. Johnson
Northeast Corner
Road and Culligan
Variance to
Setback
ne
Glenhil
Yard
1. This home is currently under construction on 1920 Glenhil Road and is a
two story, passive solar house, 40 feet by 44 feet, with tuck under
garage. The applicant is seeking a variance along the south side of the
property to allow a 3 foot extension into the 30 foot side yard setback.
2. Attached is a copy of the letter from the applicant and a copy of the
site plan indicating the basic dimensions of the site and location of the
home. �
3. You will note that the variance is for an extension to the house which
will be occupied by a hot tub. TFie applicant indicates I that this
addition was pla�ned after the initial building permit was issued.
4. The ironic thing is that the building envelope (the space w
the home could of been located on the lot) is large enouc
. accommodated the initial design, plus the hot tub addit
applicant claims the • home could not have been moved any fu
due to the topography of the site. In any case, it is �unfor
the total building plan could not have been taken into acco
time the home was positioned on the site by the architect.
5. The hot tub addition is an extension of the roof line and, tl-
14 foot dime�sion of the addition is more critical than wou
be the case. We have seen eleva�ions of the structure (sid
views of the house) and we suggest that the fourteen foc
produce a more desirable sesthetic effect, rather than to
dimension to 11 feet. We suggested that the applicant ir
elevations with the appllcations to demonstrate this point.
6. The location' of the addition, with respect to the remaii
house and lot, is such that the 3 foot intrusion and the 30
is not of material consequence. Perhaps the hardship is th�
is under constructian, without sufficient forethought haven b�
the impact of the addition. A visit to the site is reco
Planning Commissian and Council members as an aid to e�
propriety of the application as presented.
thin which
h to have
on. The
�ther north
unate that
int at the
efore, the
otherwise
and front
extension
:duce the
�de these
er of the
ot setback
the house
i given to
rended to
uating the
�
..�. , ��� ��e � eoa ,�: �;o; .'..,".,r `�- I
�,. ��i: !�, o �►:-:a _
� r. -'+. �
,, � . o'"'��►ao �!► �.=.► -
� � � �
� p�, �, .s�. ♦ �/':�',�!`...
1 �
�-
� ���� - ri � ,�
� � i
�� �
d L ,� �� �
���SI-`�� � � � `� � * • • �
,��. �� '"' .� �� .,
}.. i '�: • ���
'Cd�d�� ��►j ��,,�� , � �
l+��+� , ��,�,� � ,�.�.'.. •
:'~ �* ''�� ��� • � �� �
'� 4'� �I`�, _�� T^�� '�. �4 � � o
�. ,� y. ', .,►.:-,:
1 � �r- , . y, 0
� � V
\ � � 4.,`'� iir i� � 1{1.1 � � � ��
`'`��._ \ �'.�� \�.�p �'��
� � R '• �� �!!�
1 �`�p ��,$�p96 _ i �r„A ���
• �� ,,� ,.;:... r,�orar
�� � \ ��,. ♦
\ \ �- ,�,1',i
��a,� �`�,
` ,►
, . ����� :
, �� � •, �� • p ��''�,1��� �,` \�1�� �� �• '�`� ;��� -
. .q i �� �\` � `�y„'� ,,� �, � `.�
� � ' \\ i.' t•' ��` � �� �w ;
�l`'";;' : � , ' -` `' `iY'' fy \, '` ``,��
��� �:' . , ..'` ,, �`.�, ,<.. �� , � , :
��:, la 1 � . : r• C� �i` �i �i." ,� ;; ;'`:
'�1 , � ' � � � � ,�' ,`�� � � � � �\ �.'
°!,� � � ,n ` �',���-`% '\` ` �t:;.
1 � )`� + ;
� ,�.I 4 ��� � ����`� �:� �
q'��i J'� .� � 1 � a�. �
� 1 '�, .� �I <<„�\� ,��� ��� , {
i � ` 'G � ^� : .� t` `�yr` .r ,.,,` : ,`' ;.
� � '" � !� ,
i' ' ` • � "�J ' . `�',t.
,1'�. �i / � 1, 1�\� �\ �� ,� ^�1,,,.�~�./�+ '
..� ` , � •' .
� t �. � . ;4 � ' � ,. ' �^�4' �
i � � i `� i ��� � �\ �� �s ��' 1 4 ��.,••
��' � �j'� �: ��' � �� � �.�:� �J:�.���'��t
�
t ' 1 t� r �`( S .` � � ^i t�;,�,.��. 1�,�, �\�vt
V � r �i� \ '�'� �� 1 �� : �t � �1• Y�.
�'� � ll � ��� � � t y` . i• �� ! , %f'�C 1
`V,4 �`,'��, - 11V��� � `` �:. . `.:,`�:�y� �;;�:.;��.,;
�
,
♦
MEMO
June 2;7, 1986
�o: Mayor, City Council, and City �trhator
=rom: James E. Danielson
iub�ect:Rabanus - Frant Yard Setback Variance
Case 86-22
The Planning Commission considered the attached variance request at�their
June meeting. At that meeting concerns of the Planning Commission centered
around existing plant growth located in the applicant�s front yard that was
already a vialation af City zoning requirements. The applicant has four
beautiful evergreen trees on the corner that abstruct sight distance around the
corner and a �ungle of growth along the street edge where the fe�ce is planned
that extends out and hangs over into the street.
The Planning Commission ultimately decided that the plant growth was a
separate issue fram the variance request. I
Recammendation
The PLanning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend granting the variance.
Commissioners Henning and Frank voted against the recommendation�because there
was no demonstrated hardship. �
Action ReQuired
If the City Council wishes to implement the Planning Commis�
recommendation, they should pass a motion granting a 15 faot si�
to the south half of lot 27 Willow Spring Addition. �
i
on
yard��-var i ance
Case No. �` �� Z-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGIiTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNGSOTA
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
�
�
Date of Applicatio � ��
Fee Paid �S°� /Sa 3 y
Applicant � � �� �` C��� � . .
Name• �
Last First Initial
Ad d r e s s : 1� V � �irTrKi �� �L • �i ��� . %/1� , �� � � $
Number & Street City
Telephone Number: ��� �8
:� Owner ` : ����� ��
Name:
t
Address: ��� �
Number & Street
First
� f„ s
C ity
Stat
� r
Initial
Z ip
I1��+ti0o7"�4 �, h�r►. ,� I 1 �►
Street Location of Property in Question:
C'�LG� N�1N �C.�4t�. �� ��t�
Legal Description of Property:
27 G��
�ll � .. � � . �
State
.
Z ip
•
:�K-6�S � /4+D�a I"7'!0 �J
Type of Request: Rezoning
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
rlinor Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision Approval .
Plan Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other
/S ' ����.�
�
GI`CY {}F MENDOTA Hi�IGH`I'S
MEMO
� - - ----
,TO: P anning Commission
�
FitOM: James L•'. Danzeison and
Pubiic Works Director
;SUBJECf: Case No. $6-22, Rabanus, Variance
Jutte 17, 1986
Pau2 K. Berg
Code Enforc�ment Offic,er
� DISCUS'IOiV
M. and Mrs. Rabanus, 6$1 Callahan Place, construcCed a pool with�the
requir d fence enclosing the poal area, They would like to enlarge the fenced-in
area a ound the pool. There �.s adequate area to do this on both the no�rth and
east, owever, Mr. Rabanus feels that extending the fence to the south�into
exist' g shrubbery is his pref erred lacatian. Staff can see no hardship involved
witYt_t is variance request.
ACTION REQUIRED
eview the variance r.equest with the applicant and make a recammendation
to th City Cauncil. !
PRB1��D:madir
ie��'�,'-�'',r� %'` /C'CG'�.t� ,, �".�+it'�'�-
L�� �"*�'G"�;'¢1��'�" �"� `
,/�y�.►�t�►,�T'-�-� .r��"�5',
!�-r.l.�/ "�/' _' i �+�"'�'Ci' ",�''�'`�"'' �" •� +C'� ``•+�,�
r .,i"'
••:iJ wj
-,��'�''t SGr.r�� 7�?''�'--T y''Dn",� � ,,•�-,r�Ji},�2-g„�,
��,9--r ,�� .��-� ��,�,.��- �.,�.,�- ,��,��.��-
�Qo� ,�y� �-,��� �:��"- f�'��;�'..� . ;�,�'_ ,�"��
�1��� /.:3��... ��..G�os�� /� � .�9`` .�'�`',�ti'G�.. �f��;L
f}- �yt/•z//.�ltt`,� �y`f��rri��'�'".����.,?'_`,,� ftt��,T�
i�ili'`� Cfc'..���'�it.�'G%�.S ,�'`!'�-� ��.�'i y�i'�`�T`'-,,y
fe'�.�tsd�'s. �'�' r�;��-- .,��'.�'�,.;�.� �,�:s�---
�"'�.��'s Gz�E.. �,�y�.. J3r�rG�'��;� ��,�,.�v�'�"
�TT/`' '+G!'�J`f�� ,7b �"r"�- S/�� ��- 7'`iS�'-- �"c��.�,
��,T-` �� r��.- :��,�r,�.� ,,.�f,a� ��.- u��.�-.�
��:Gl.� ,i�'�" �="�i�-/G-� .y"�'-2-�.'� �f-' �i"�/ i/'�-�' �
. �'��-�- G,r�v',f✓ �"� ��.- �.c..i �;'.�.,�,'��;r�-,�.� .-
�,�-7���;�� ,,��.,��� � %'��� ,,,�`r�f�.._s �
� .�'��`i ,r�'`-�- .�,�',�-Y'i��- �"�/�--- � �•�'�9rz�-��-�'..�
. �
� ,�s�r� j��s ��7� �c� ����:�.. �,�.����
l,�af�?�`�%� ,�''�-� ��.��`=� 7~,�a`� �"�:c��.� G�/lG�..
13�- i'?���L=� ��L���,t� . �5 .��`'�'Z,�"`—�1�..��'�{.�2i�c'.,�.
%%��%� ��'�--Gr' j ,��i .�t'/� %� G�.%�"�''"�'�J
�'i�t���'-��',�Tld,� ��-4.�2.. ,�'��"�..�.- �,L�7Zai�c.,�'i�t/,�..a
�/4.���i .' D�"'S � J'"7� ,Gt�i,�i�7'"'��'i i��",,�..�i'".s
�r�j2y�G�/.3,.T�".�'-7,�Di�vS ,�',rl3�"'�:G��t�'.rr- i��►-s ��� .
��.���f_..�- �►'�� /.���C.c�=� .CGitr'.�f�•� �'f''„�1��. C�G,��.
�- �-��=`reCG�L.- .9��Fss -- ,�' �►iS�i -�i�''�rJ£.�.
� �' �. ,, ? -�• '., , (� • ? �-, --
/.• ;+ �.. /. ;' � .. . , /'t .� ,� . � r' : / � �� .��. � .�. � � � .' , .
. --- -- ,
� ; � / /t� Jj
��.n:. .��_r'.�L,r,..�1.t. Y_ rtr''L� I7"" C�c,(.<<tZ_./ic%LG'"...1_.....__:.__.__�.._._._. _....---...-�---" -.
_,���, � � ����� ��✓�� -��� �o.�-���r����o �������s .
..1.�.��CS ���' N�h�d77t�
;
-rood
.
, ; �i�'T7 ,Y I ���� �ii���/� �_/ �b/�..�i /V�l �
�S�svy
-c�N�.lS�X�
�
��:�id
/�Hb77f�J /S�%
�
.o
v
,.
- ,Z4L f. .
�' S9rY/yc�5 �'1o77//y1 LZ' 107,�0 � '4�'
„�►. r�., df' LDT �2,,�' st�/Gtol�' ,�',���u6s
's � �?h9t
��� -•-�' wwr
�
��/ frT� i�+"'!�/`/'�r
�' i'����fi+�
Ex'/ST/NG�
N����
/����i�.�"� �/r� +� E ,Q���/'���r ��.�.�i;
�
1�
� � �
� .� �
✓r% �
G�9�L�h��/�/ ��;►�tG�' .�'�""�=�`�"T
�erc� f �'�'.1.�_
�G1,�3/!a'/T.�''� /rrt/'C�d/t��'.�'��l�'7�"'d�.r' �'''�r`�' ���',�t�'"�'/�ti'r� �r�}i��91 ,. ,�c+g�,�c�u,S
.
LAf�U
�
� , �" ATE:
�:��` �:: �
NUMBER:
PLICANT:
OCATIUN:
24 June 1986
8622
Richard C. Rabanus I
Northeast Corner � Lot on
Callahan Place (see sketch)
�.
REC�UESTED:
CONSIDERATIONS:
Variance to Fence Height
1. Mr. and Mrs. Richard C. Rabanus are constructing a new pool in the
back yard of their property, which is a corner lot north and east of
Callahan Place. The lot has 107 feet of frontage to the west of
Callahan Place, with a depth of 202 feet.
2. This being a corner lot, the side yard along the south side is contiguous
to a public street and, therefore, requires a 30 foot setback for
structures and fences over 2-1/2 feet. The Rabanuses propose to fence
the pool with a 6 foot high board fence, which Mr. Rabanus informs us
will be vertical boards 9 inch on center with a 3 inch space between
the boards. They propose to build this fence within a portion of the
side yard contiguous to Callahan Place, as indicated on the attached
site plan. You will notice that the fence will extend 15 feet into the
side yard amongst a grove of trees that exists along the soutth side of
the property. �
3. The property at this location is lower than Callahan Street and this is
one of the reasons that they proposed a higher fence. A 5' foot high
fence is required for safety purposes around any outdoor pool in the
City of Mendota Heights. �
The fact that the land is lower than the street suggests the practicality
for the higher fence. Since the fence is partially constructed in the
wooded area, it would appear as though the fence will ha',ve limited
impact. on contiguous properties. �
4. Mr. Rabanus informs us that he has obtained a list of signatures for
approval from a number of his neighbors. This list is attached. It
would appear that the fence variance proposal has reasonable validity.
:1
;��
0
To:
From:
Sub iec
MEMO
June 25, 1986
Mayor, City Council, City '�a�
/
James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
t: Condor Corporation, Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development
Rezoning, and Subdivision Case No. 86-10
DIS.CU$S ION :
r. Mike Thompson, Condor Corporation, attended the May Planning Com-
missi n meeting and presented the attached quadraminium plan. The Planning
Commi sion conducted the required public hearing considering the requests
and, ecause the City has no ordinances in place to accommodate the re�
quest , recommended denial of the application.
RECO ENDATION:
Staff and the Planning Commission, because the ordinances to grant the
appr val for this request are not in place, recommmend denial of the Ie-
ques .
ACTI N REQUIRED:
Conduct the required public hearing to consider the Conditional
Use ermit for the Planned Unit Development and rezoning. No hearing
' is r quired for the subdivision request. If the Council desires to
impl ment the Planning Commission and Staff's recommendation, they
shou d pass a motion adopting a resolution denying the request.
Coun il should state their reasons for denial and direct the City
Atto ney to prepare,the resolution. .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR, REZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
June 17� 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City'Council will
meet at 9:00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday,July 1, 1986, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 750 South Plaza Drive, to consider an application from Mr. James
Riley, for the rezoning, subdivision and a conditional use permit for a planned
unit development of the following property:
Part of the SW'� of Section 36, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County.
(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
More particuTarly, this land is located between Mendota Heights Road (extension)
and I-494 south and west of Huber Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401, Such
persons as desire to be heard witli reference to the proposed conditionaT use permit
for a planned unit development, rezoning and subdivision will be heard at this
meeting.
.
�
Kathleen M. Swanson J-
City Clerk
.�
<:.___.__�
Applica�nt
Name�: Ril�y
(;:�sc No. ..�� � `./ �i
CITY OF MG[�1DOT� HEIGIiTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, :fINNESOTA
APPLICATION i'OR CONSIDERATION
OF
PI,�'��NING RI;QIJEST
Date oE Application 5/5/86
Fee Pa id �J3 S� /c�' q�/
James R. I
Last First Initial
Addr ss: 2320 Lexington Ave. South, Mendota Heights, MN
Number & Street City State
Tele hone Number: 452-2626 ,
Owner
Name:: Riley � James R.
55120
Zip
Last First Initial .
Addr ss: 2320 Lexington Ave. South, Nendota Heights, MN 55120
Number & Street City State 7.ip �
Street ocation of Property in Question: '
Betwe n I�iendota Hei hts Rd. (extension) and I-494 South and West of Huber Dr.
Lega1 D scription of Property:
See a tached '
Type of�Request:
�
X Rezoning
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
X Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
?�[inor Conditional Use Permit
X Subdivision Approval
Plan _Appr_av.a1 _. _ _.. _ _...
[detlands Permit
Other
�
ApplicG�ble Cit;y Ordinance Number 301 & 401
Prese�lL' "Loning c�f i'raperCy: .R-1 and R-l�
Yresenc Use oE I'roperCy: VdC�.nt
Section
ProPosed `Loning oF. Property: R-3 Mul�iple Family Residential P. U. D.
Pro�osed tlse aE Property: R�sidential - attached - see attached
Number oP peapl.e intended Co live ��Xc�'� on premises. s�e att�ched
I hereby decl��re that all. statements rnade in thi.s request and on Che additional
maL-erial are t�ue.
� ' � �' .���
� ��
Sig ure of Applicant ��,
,
�� �^ ,/� Cn � �
7 S.-
i l `f
l�3tG' ,/
"�/i''"tn . �'�'l.%
y�
Received by (title}
NOTE: The Eal.lowin� plans sha11 be drawn and attached to this applicatian:
A. Applicatians involving a Variance shall submit the fa1l..owing plans:
DaCe Received Initial
1. 5ite Development Plan
2. Dimension Plan
3. Landscape Plan
4. Gradin�; P1an
B. Applications involving a Rezonin�, Conditional Use Permit ar Subdi.v9.sion
shall submit the following: .
�
t
1. Sketch Pl.an
2. Abstractars Certiiicate
'(Tf the subdivisian involves cuttin� of existin� parcel into two or more Lots).
�._..�_� _ .Y-
_... -���"'�' �C":"" Applications'involvin� a tde'tlands Permit stlall submit t}ie foLiowing:
l, A Full & s�dequate description of ��11 �hases o� ttie aperata.on &ior �ro��osed
physic<�l ctYtznges.
2. A topographic map af Che area. Contour interva.Ls sliall be dr�wn ��C twa {2)
�oot intervals at a t�orir.or�cal scale o� 1" = 1,000' ar I��rger.
3. A detailed site plan af Che proQosal showing pro�osed draina�e, gradin� & l�nds�
4. A site desigr� map st��wing the l.ocation of existing anc3 Euture man-made feacures
within ti}e site and ca a distanc� �C Eive hundred (500) LeeC surroundiF��; che sit
�`�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That
R/47 0
Highw
the C
oF th
the n
Secti
32 se
Quart
descr
of 21
with
of 31
with
of 22
Quart
Wes �,
a dis
of th
East,
ALSO:
Townsl
Heigh�
No . 4�
art of the East One-half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36
ip 28, Range 23, Dakota County, i4innesota, lying South of the s
�iendota Heights Road and North oF the northerly R/W of Interst
y �o. 494 as established by Document No. 406226 in the office o
unty Recorder, Dakota County, htinnesota.
that part described as follows: That part oF the Southeast Qu
Southwest Quarter oF said Section 36 described as commencing a
rthwest corner of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of s
n 36; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 57 minut
�nds East, along the north line of said South Half of the South
r, a distance of 1487.00 feet to the beginning of the land to b
bed; thence South 15 degrees 02 minutes 28 seconds East, a dist
.75 feet; thence South 0 degrees 19 minutes 19 seconds East, pa
�e west line of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter, a•dis
.55 feet; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes O1 seconds West, p
ie south line of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter, a di
.30 feet to the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the South
� of said Section 36; thence North 0 degrees 06 minutes 10 seco
31ong the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
3nce of 526.78 feet to the northwest corner of said Southeast Q
Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 32 secon
3 distance of 168.45 feet to the point of beginning.
�e west 100.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of said Section
ip 28, Range 23, lying South of the southerly R/W of said Mendo
s Road and North of the northerly R/[d of said Interstate Highwa
4, as established by Document vo. 446226.
utherly
te
rter�
id
s
est
nce
allel
ance
rallei
tance
�st
3s
.iarter,
3rter
LANNUVG REPORT
ATE:
' ASE NUMBER:
PPLICANT:
OCATION:
CTION RE�UESTED:
CONSIDERATIOIVS:
27 May 1986
:. �
James R. Riley
South of Men
Road, North of
(See Sketch)
Rezoning from
PUD, Conditional
for Planned Unit
and Approval of
We are writing this report with somewhat incomplete data, h�
furnished a preliminary copy of the printed explanatory te�
inclusive graphics. We have, however, been furnished a prelim
of four sheets of the proposed plan, including the preliminary
plan, grading plan, utility plan, and landscape plan. We do I
any copies of drawings illustrating the architecture of the
massing, height, building materials, colors, etc. In our opinion;
the concept for the land use is so inappropriate that these di
be irre e� �
Heights
�te 494
to R-3
�e Permit
ielopment,
iivision
�ving been
t without
nary copy
plat/PUD
not have
structures,
however,
�tails may
2. The applicant is proposing the development of a 150 unii complex
housed primarily in quadramiums (four units to a structure). � The net
lot size is 130 feet • by 130 feet for a four unit structure, equalling
4,225 square feet per unit. This represents a density of slightly under
ten units per acre. The overall density, including the three outlots,
produces 150 units on 33.7 acres or approximately 4.4 units per acre.
The density proposed for this area in the amendmenti to the
comprehensive plan in the Southeast Area Study was eight I units per
acre. The 33.7 acres at eight units per acre would accommodate 269
units in some form of multi-family housing other that quadramiums.
3. The application is to rezone the land to R-3 PUD in accordance with
the designation adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council
for review by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council,
however, has not approved the land use plan amendment si�ce it daes
not contain a revised policy on implementing noise ordinances as
recommended by them. The City has not adopted such a noise contour
policy and implementing ordinances, because the Metropolitan Council has
not produced the model ordinances required. The Council has directed
the staff to prepare these ordinances, which are inte:�ded to be
completed by the Fall of 1986. Since the compreherisive plan
amendment has not been approved by the Metropolitan Council; the City
pAMES R. RILEY, CASE 8610
Council has not adopted the ordinances implementing
comprehensive changes. Thus, the rezoning as proposed in th
land use plan is not available or ap_p ication_ to tt
recommended for mu ti- ami y housing in the amended plai
these conditions, it would appear appropriate for the
Commission and Council to simply deny the proposal as submit
Page 2
the MET
; amended
e parcels
�. Under
Planning
4. At the time implementing ordinances are adopted, applicatiori could be
made for development under their control. In the meantirne; the land
remains zoned R-1, which requires 15,000 square foot lots with a
minimum of 100 feet of frontage measured at the building line.
S. With respect to the merits of the submitted proposal, we are
that such land use is contemplated for the area. The deve
plans submitted consists of a ver ri id eometric pattern, ir
to the terrain. The entire site would have to be gra e,
most of the vegetation on the site. It is difficult
quadraminiums to rolling terrain because each structure is co
a joint driveway serving structures on the other side. Thi:
' very difficult to adjust grades between individual structures.
words, a quadraminium development of this type is more appr
flat land, which the subject property definitely is not.
6. One of the outlots (Outlot A) is surrounded by development,
the outlot, not even leaving the ability to create a pathway
site.
astounded
oment of
aescroying
to adapt
iected by
makes it
In other
�riate for
nd the
7. The undulating terrain, the existing vegetation, and the prominent hills
and ponds make this land ideal for imaginative planning for multi-family
housing structures. Spacious areas can be maintained in their natural
state, utilizing such a development concept. Whereas I with the
quadraminiums proposed, the terrain is devastated and the ponding areas
become largely irrelevant. i -
8. The very tight geometric pattern proposed with the street I system is
accentuated by the use of narrow private streets that, in our opinion,
are inappropriate for this form of development. Most I successful
quadraminium sites in the Metropolitan Area are developed with much
larger lots and a public street system. �
Of considerable concern is the relationship between the proposed
development and the contemplated Airport Noise Contour FZegulations.
�evelopment in zone 4 contemplates multi-family housing structures with
a common entrance by provisional use. Basically, this means" that they
are permitted with building techniques to mitigate the `impact of
sircraft sound waves. I
9.
`'.. �- ;{:.: ��
< '' ` `. '�.. .
,f-ti+'A`"" �l+
� `� +`M''c;, ;'4 �"' `�''�=:,c.
• ..��«t..j.. � C{�f.
. Y���4: j .�� �Y':y':.
` � *�St/'�f•,,�''��•-i�!; l:.i'i' �fl.
`�' � '' .� �� y, i ° �„�
� �R � ; ti, � � �� "�, v -
� � � r ti� �
ry, �
�^ � a } , wt 7 i.;
�w « ,� e . � at
� � ro n �.
f a
�: f.�� �4. ; f � `Gh.t � � f �,.
F
�,e r.• t"yA � �-x n s, z.ts � r a � .� 8"".+I t�
;... ,7 � e � Y x:,e : t z*�5.. s'�'a+z a+r.wrr,
z � ; --a� T. r - n', t+ ,� r �' '� . > '� � �.f
q �rrxz y �.xv�rt. w �
�,,k, .} r.,. . �� n: �� �...,,, � .x...
��+.,r,_..r.___ .. � ����y��
^�•.'? 4• .. . � �
,"a��,.. � ;" k "�'"
;:- -
l . ` 4 � �.,'+" ....
' „'• £ 4 : r,
�� �':' _ _x _ i.,�.. ,��i, "d�-
�
x . �,
.� x� � .
, ,� �
4 U 4.
�
� ..�is�s -i �L'.``Y ?. y � r +4k?zi,;k v .-a... .sr.
}�='�==—�Y.;r�l.r.r�,i...i, � �` ,t•Lt,� � :..
- a.y�- �
�
r_�.
. . * .
' `' : � � ���/
�
�
► • � . �
T0:
S
it:
rec
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 27, 1986
Mayor and City Council
�i: Kevin D. Frazell, t A�is ator
JECT: Receipt of City Hall Committee Recommendation
The citizen`s City Hall Committee has completed its work,. publishing
study�and recommendation. For a brief reference, the City Ha1liCommittee's
ommendation is as follows:
"..based an the data gathered by the City Hall Committee, thelstudies
presented by the architect, and the input of City staff, the City
Hall Committee concludes that it is advantageous for the City of Mendota
Heights to own its City Hall as opposed to expanded rental space, and
therefore the Committee recommends that the City of Mendota Heights proceed
to construction of a City Ha11 at the Lexington/TH 110 site." �
City Council met with the Committee in workshop on Thursday, J�
re iew the contents of the report. At th at meeting, Council indica
it felt that it would be appropriate to formally accept the report
�ul rly scheduled City Council meeting. Therefore, this agenda item
re
0
0
Staff will be considering the necessary follow-up actions, and
t for discussion at the Council meeting of July 15 or August 5.
comments or suggestions, those can be made known this evening.
The only fo�m�l action required this evening is for Council to
iving the report.
�:madlr
ine 26 to
ted that
it a reg-
�is before
iwill schedule
IIf Council has
�pass a motion
To:
From:
Subject;
Discuss
Mayor, City Council,
Klayton Eckles
Plans and Specs far
MEM4
and Cit���n�s�.'rator
n
Evergreen Knolls 2nd Addition
June 27, 1986
The plans for Evergreen Knolls 2nd Additian are attached. These pla
not yet finalized; staff will be finalizing the plans and specs in the n
days. , riginally staff planned ta have everything finished by July 7th,
have a pecial meeting to apprave the plans and specs. But since the ma
gortion of the design is complete, staff feels a special meeting on July
be avoi ed if the plans and specs are approved at the July lst meeting.
plans
devel
this
I�
other alternative is
d specs, but Jim and
r is anxious Ca ge�
son.
ndatian
s are
xt �ew
then
7th can
ta wai� until the July 15th meeting to agprtsve Che
I will be out of town at that time. A1so, �he
the project aut for bid so it can be constru�cted
S aff recommends council approve the plans and specs for Evergreen�Knolls
2nd Ad ition and authorize staff to advertise for bids, subjec� to fina�ized
desa.gn of the plans and specs.
Ac��.on+Required
Pa s Resolution 86- RESOLUTION APPROV7NG FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AU ORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE EVERGREN KNOLLS
2ND AD ZTION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. $6, PROJECT N0. 6), subject to
the fi al�zing o� the pZans and specificatians. �
TO : I
DI
CITY OF MENI}OTA HEIGHTS
•�lu �15[�]
Mayor, City Council and City '��ator
. James E. Danielson
Public Works Director
. Copperfield Phase II
Job No. 8620
Improvement No. 86, Project No. 7
SION:
June 26, 1'
The City initiated' an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 'for the
Cop erfield PTanned Unit Development in May 1986. An EAW is required by
Sta e Statute when construction of one hundred or more unattached residen-
tia units are proposed and Coperfield Phase II approvals brought the total
app oved development to over 100 homes. �
no
of
According to the State rules, the City prepares tfie EAW documeri�t�and
ibutes it to some 14 agencies, together with any contiguous municipali-
that might be affected'. In this case a copy was also sent to S�unfish
�
I have attached the responses received by the City from the agencies
if ied. As you can see from the responses, there are no comments�that
icate an Environmental Impact Statement (.EIS) is necessary. Preparation
an EIS would be the next step should it be found necessary by the EAW
cess to go further with more study. I .
The agency that is to make the determination whether or not an�'EIS is
ne ded is called the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) and the state
st tutes identify the different RGUs for the various different categories of
EA 's. For the "Residential Development Category" which this EAW is cate-
go ized as, the local government unit is the RGU.
Staff has reviewed the information received from the responding agen-
ci s and from the developer and prepared a recommended Resolution tliat finds
th t there is no significant environmental impact that would warrant the
pr paration of an,EIS. That resolution is attached. �
Ag
Co
bi
PER'S AGREEN�NT
Staff has worked with the Developer to prepare the attached Devloper's
ment and we feel it adequately addresses all the areas of citylconcern.
ILITY REPORT
Also attached is a petition for improvements and waiver of hea�
cil needs to accept the petition and order the preparation of a
ty report.
•ing.
f easi-
RECOMNIENDATION
Staff recommends that Council :
1. Review the EAW information and make a negative declaration to the
EQB on environmental concerns.
2. Approve and sign the Developer's Agreement.
3. Accept the petition for public improvements and order the prepara-
tion of a feasibility report.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they should
pass motions adopting Resolution 86- •, RESOLUTION CONSIDERING THE ,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNIENTS WORKSHEET (EAk�) FOR THE COPPERFIELD DEVELOPMENT,
and Resolution 86- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT.
�'
l
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-
RESOLUTION CONSIDERING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMFNT
WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR THE COPPERFIELD DEVELOPMENT
EREAS, Tandem Corporation, the developer h.as prepared an Environiental
sessment Worksfieet (EAW) for the Copperfield Subdivision; and
REAS, the City of Mendota Heights has distributed copies of the�EAW
the required agencies and Sunfish Lake for their review and comments;
EREAS, the thirty day review and� comment period�for this EAW. Tap�
J e 18, 1986; and'
EREAS, the City of Mendota� Heights has conducted' public hearings
t e approvaT of this subdivision;; and`
:d� on�
regarding;
EREAS, there have tieen�no findings either d'ur•ing,the subdivisionlpublic
arings or from the comments received� d'ur• ing the� EAW' review process that
uld suggest tfiat there is a. potential f'or any significant enviroi ental
fects; and�
HEREAS, Mendota Heights has reviewed the criteria for deciding whether a
roject has potential for significant environmental effects under the
rovisions of 6 MCAR S 3.028D and finds are none. .
OW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the staff of the City of Mendota Heights
e directed to file a negative declaration� with� respect to significant
nvironmentaT effects with the EnvironmentaT Quality Board (EQB) and with
11 other persons on the EAW distribution list for the Copperfield� Subdivi-
ion.
iopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this ls�t day of
�ly, 1986.
e
thleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR COPPERFIELD SUBDIVISION PHASE II
EAS, a petition has been filed wi.th the City Council requesting
tary sewer, storm sewer, water and street improvements to serve
erfield Subdivision Phase II.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RF50LVED by the City Council of the Ci
ota Heights, Minnesota, as follows:
of
T. Tfiat the above described' petition.be and is hereby accepted� by
the City Counci:l of the City of Mend'ota, Heights.. �
2. That the City, Engineer be� and� is heretiy, a�uthorized' and dir �
ected to prepare a�feasibility study as to whether said� proposed� im=
provements are feasible•, whether said� improvements should' best�be made
as proposed' or in connection� with some other improvement, andi as to the
estimated cost of said� improvement., +
Ad pted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this lst
Ju y, 1:986.
T:
K thleen M. Swanson
C ty Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Roliert
' I .
. Lockwood, Mayor•
day of
� TAN�
CORPO
BROKERS •
�
EM
►TION
9NNERS � DEVELOPERS
ay 19, 1986
James L. Ostenson
Richard A. Putnam
6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 /(612) 941-]070
r. Jim Danielson
C'ty of Mendota Heights
7 0 South Plaza Drive
M ndota Heights, Minnesota 55120
R : Copperfield Znd Addition
De r Jim:
Ple se be advised that we would like to formally request the City of N
Hei hts to proceed on the Feasability Study of our Copperfield 2nd Addition.
Ple se inform us of any deposits that have to be paid. As you know, our
is t begin grading yet this summer and have utilities and streets install
fall.
Tha k you for your kind consideration of this matter.
Sinc rely,
. C
Jim tenson
For C pperfield Associates
JO: o
dota
sire
this
PETITION FOR SANITARY, STORM SEWER, WATER,
AND STit�ET IMF'ROYEhIEtdTS AND WAIYER �F HEARING
The undersigned, being th� owner of the following described property
situated in the City af Mendota Heights, in the Couaty of Dakota and State
of Minnesota� to-wit:
Nartheast Qnarter (NE2J4 of Section 3b, Township 28, Range 23
Pursuant to the provisions af M.S.A. 429.03I, Subd. 3, the undersigned
hereby petitions the Cit}i Council of the City of Mendata Heights to con-
struct and extend said City's-�Sanitarp and Storm Sewer, Water, and 5treet
Systems so as to directly serve the above described property and to assess
the entire cast o£ said improvement� (including the cost o€ any land or
easement acquisition incurred '�y reeson�tfiereof) against said property. The
undersig,ned hereby, fuzther specifically waivea the requirement of any hear-
iag and� said� improvements andi assessments therefare and�further waives tlie
requireaient a€ publication and� mailed� notice of oar• wit�i� respect to any such
Iiea�r• ing=, ar hear• ings=. �' . �
Tiie• und°erslgned farther agrees ta donate• to. tiie City af Mend'ata Heigiits
any easementa� over• the abave� descri6ed' property required� for said pro ject.,
Dat��: G—�►—�6
� ..�•.��. .
� � ,� .
' � . a� �r �r I'� ../�''
�
''� �r.1
LYMAN LURZBEft COMPANY
Its
Minnesota
Environmental Quality Board
100 Capitol Square Building
550 Cedar Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Phone
17, 1986
Jim Danielson
� Pub ic Works Director
750 S. Plaza Drive
Men ota Heights, MN 55120
RE:�Close of EAW Review Period for Copperfield
Mr. Dar_ielson:
The 30-day review and couunent period for this EAW ended o
198 . According to rule MCAR 3.028 B.l.a., a decision on
for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS} is to be made
wor ing days of the expiration of the comment period unle
dec'sion will be made by a body which meets only periodic
whi h case the decision is to be made at the first meetin
day after the expiration date and in no case more than 3
dav afterwards.
In �aking the EIS decision please�note the €ollowing
6 M AR 3.028:
� June 18,
the need
within 15
�s the
.11y, in
� 10 or more
calendar
of
1. You must maintain a written record o€ some sort, including
specific findings of fact, which supports your decision. I would
appreciate receiving a copy of your record of decisio'n along with
notice of your decision. �
2. A notice of the decision is to be sent within five working days
to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB), all persons+ on the EAW
distribution list, all persons who commented, and anyone who
makes a request (see B.4.). The EQB will publish notzce of yo��r
decision in the E�B Monitor. I
3. If your decision is to prepare an EIS, your notice must also
include your proposed scope of the EIS and the date,�time and
place of the scoping meeting. Please call me beforeyscheduling a
scoping meeting to assure that the meeting will fall'�between 10
working days and 20 calendar days after publication of the notice
in the EQB Monitor. The scoping meeting must also be noticed by
a press release. �
Pl ase contact me at (612) 296-8263 if any questions arise about the
En ironmental Review Proaess. �
Si cerely,
1/'����i�-�`':.
Gr gg M. Downino� Environmental Review Coordinator
To 1-free: 1-800-652-9747; ask for EQB, Environmental
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
�O
iew Program '
���
M I N N ESOTA H I STO R I CA L SOC I ETY
FOUNDED IN 1849
June 2, 1986
Mr. Dick Putnam
c/o Tandem Corporation
6440 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Putnam:
Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, MN 55111 •(612) 726
Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Copperfield - Family Lot Project
Northeast '� Section 36, T28°, &23
Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota
MHS Referral File Number: AE1-641
(PLEASE REFER TO THIS NUMBER IN. ALL
FUTURE CORRESPONDENCE)
On 15 May 1986, the State Historic Preservation Office received a request for
comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above listed project.
A farmstead, commonly referenced as the Darsow Farm, exists within the project
area;'this farmstead was brought to the attention of this office in 1985 by an
interested party. At that time an initiaT site inspection was conducted by
sr�,ff nf rhe State Hisr_orie Preservation Office, witt� request for �ddi_t-ional
historical documentation of the farmstead to be prepared by the said party.
On this subject, documentation relative to the farm was requested by the State
Historic Preservation Office from Tandem Corporation in a telephone conversation
of 29 May I986. It is our understanding tfiat such will be forthcoming shortly.
Upon receipt of this material, the State Historic Preservation Office will be
able to complete its review of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
This letter constitutes the first written comment on this review (and the
subject farmstead) issued by the State Historic Preservation Office.
Sincerely, �
�
Susan Roth
Research Historian
State Historic Preservation Office
SR:dmb
r/cc: City of Mendota Heights
Mr. Jim Danielson
Public Works Director
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
��
DNR INFORMI
(612) 296-6'
,TION
57
' STATE OF
JUVlS��� -��-
DEPARTMENT
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
BOX , 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55146
Mr. im Danielson
City of Mendota Heights
750 outh Plaza Drive
Mend ta Heights, Minnesota 55120
June 19, 1986
RE: �COPPERFIELD - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW)
DearlMr. Danielson:
The �epartment of Natural Resources (DNR) fias reviewed the above-ref
docu ent and we offer the following comments for your consideration.
Beca se of the extensive acreage of water resources on tlie site there'is a need
to p otect these resources from erosion and sedimentation impacts.dur�ing
cons ruction. While the EAW indicates that erosion control measures will }ie
appl'ed, there was no evidence of those measures on the site in worlc�completed
as of late May. We urge you to require the developer to implement th�e
app priate erosion control measures immediately.
We ould also like to draw your attention to the section of the Environmental
Rev'ew Program rules (Minn. Rules Ch. 4410.3100) that profiibits final�
gov rnmental approvals or consturction of a project before the completion of the
env ronmental review process. The Copperfield. project clearly violates that
rul provision and we are notifying the Environmental Quality Board �f that fact
by opy of this letter.
Tha k you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any
que tions regarding these comments, please contact Don Buckhout of my staff at
(61 ) 296-8212. j
c:
don:
Sincerely,
%��2'� lif/� ����`' .''
.(J2i'Joseph M. Kurcinka, Supervis
Environmental and Management
Analysis Section
DB:pmc
Kathleen Wallace
Kent Lokkesmoe
Earl Huber
Gregg Downing-EQB
Dick Putnam-Tandem Corporation
00/1
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
�� ��5�
lr�NN�T,4
�� y0
� a
� �
� ��
�~�OF TFIP��
June 10, 1986
0
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Jim Danielson, Public Works Director
750 South PTaza Drive
Mendota Heights, MN: 55120
Re: Gopperfield�
Environ�mental Assessment Wor•ksheet (EAW.)-
Distr• ict 9.:� (Mendota� Heights - Dakota� County);
Dear Mr. Danielson:
Phone 296-1652
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed a
review of the above-referenced EAW�. We anticipate that the proposed
project will cause little adverse impact to our transportation
facilities.
I€ you require additiona7: information from Mn/DOT, please contact
Jerry Skelton, Planning Coordinator at our District Office in
Oakdale, phone number (612) 779-1210.
Sincerely,
��ti%�,
Cheryl Heide, Planner
Office of Environmental Services
An Equu! Opporrunily Employer
�
�
'� .
Jun 33, 19$� _
Mr. iCevin D. Frazell. Administrator
Cit of Mendota Heights ,
750 South Plaze Drive ..
Men ata Heights, MN 55i20
RE:
At
fo
�
,�
, °.�. �„t�!/}_ {,r'M �
;* �'
�F. � �
�wlN C:Iti�Y: s
Environmental Assessment Warksheet (EAW)
Capperfield
Metropolitan Couneil Referral Fi3.e No. 13681-1
Mr. Frazell:
�
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
5eventh and Robert Streets
Sfi. Pa�u4. Minnesota b5101
T� lephone (612) 291-6359
�
����� G ,,� � �v��
its meeting on June 12, 19$b, the Metropolitan Caunei]. eonsidered� tlze EAW
Copperfield. This consideration was based on the following stat�ement.from
Cansent List whieh was approved by the Couneil.
Copperfield 9ssoeiates are propasing to construct.182 single family homes
on a 137-acre site in southeastern Mendota Heights. The site is�part af the
area covered by a recent plan amendment (File No. 11666-2),, whieh was
withdrawn from consideration af�er �he Coaneil required modification
related to potential impacts from aireraft noise. Approximatelylthe
sauthern third of the Capperfield Subdivisian is within Noise Impaet Zone
TV of MSP International Airport. Single fami:ly detaehed housing�in Noise
Zane IV for MSP is identified as a"conditional" use under the Council's
land use conpatibility guidelines. To be allowed, This type af pro3eet
needs to meet several conditions, including assurance of appropriate
trea�men� in eonstruetion and notifieation of oeeupants of aireraft noise
impact. The EAW properly identifies the status of the current aircraft
noise issue for �he city. However, the third phase af the prajeet would
have to meet the conditions in the land use compatibili,ty �uidelines to be
eansistent with the Couneil's Aviation Chapter. In addi.tion, should home
prices exceed modest-aast levels, Mendota Heights is eneouragedlto take
additianal steps taward achieving its 10-year �oal of 197 new modest-cost
housing units. �siith the exception af that phase three of the projeet should
not be developed as proposed until such time as the "conditional" land use
requirements can be me�, the projeet is eonsistent with all faur
An Equal Opportunity Employer
�_ � __-- � -- -- - - -- - - - - ._ - � - �r
devel
sys"te
and w
centu
evalu
Plann
the c
the o
role.
the p
signi
his s
agr ic
towns
agric
nomin
When:
is� no
typic
has b
impar
struc
pment along southeast Minnesota's river transportatian�
as well as during the agricultural expa�sion into sauthern
stern Minnesota during the late 19th and early 20th
ies» This development process forms �he basis for thei
tian o� such buildi.ngs wi�.hin Minneso�.a's Comprehensive
ng Process. Consideration af the Darsow Farmstead wit{hin
ntext of agricultural devel.opment does no�. indica�e that
ners or operatians canstituted a particularly significant
The dacumentation indicates that Mr. Smi�.h's ownersha.p af
operty was merely speculative and is not such to conno'te a
icant hzstaric association. Wi.11iam Darsow's, and la�.'er-
n Albert's, associations with �he property consti:�.ute�
Ttural activities and distinctions they share with� €el�low
ip and county farm resa.den�s and do not indicate an
ltural con�ribution.that can substantially support
tion� o� the proper•�y.
ubjecting �he archa.tectural cri.ter• ia �o. the far•mstead,� i�
ed tha� the house, bar•n and' associated: outbui].dings are
1 vernacular far� structures. We c3a not believe tha� �t
en demonstrated that the bui:ldings are particular•ly
an� wi�hin the cantext of �he evolution of aqricultural
ures.
In co clusion, i� is our opinion tha�, although the Darsow �
may e hibit agricultural fea�ures and characteristics of in�
on a ocal Ievel, it possesses neither the archi,tec�ural
da.sti ctiveness nor germane historical significance to meet
Natio al Regi.ster criteria.
I� ya have any ques�.ions regarding this review, please
canta t this office.
SS.nce�rely,
� ( - ,�-.�,.�,�--t�,�
� Russe 1 W, Fridley
State Historic Preservata.on Officer
RWF:
cc: r. Jim Danielson
City of Mendota Heights
750 Sou�h Plaza Drive
Mendata Heights, MN 55].20
Kalista K. Laudon
2315 Delaware Avenue
Mendata Heights, MN 551.
Gary Phelps, Directar
Dako�a County Historical, Saciety
�1:30 Third Avenue North
5outh St, Paul, MN 55075
�`a rm
.erest
�,
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT CONCERNING COPPERFIELD 2ND ADDTIT
SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON THE 46 ACRES LOCATED IN
THE NORTH PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF
SECTION 36, T28N, R23W,
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
This A,qreement, made and entered into this
of
, 1986, by and between the City o f Mendota Heights, Dakota
�ty, Minnesota, (hereinafter calied the "City") and Copperfieid Asso I iates,
' I
Tandem Corporntion, 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344,
�inafter calied the "Deveioper"). �
WITNESSETH:
W EREAS, Developer proposes a piat for a single family development in ME
He'ghts to be known as Copperfield 2nd Addition, consisting of 53 singie ;
lot on approximateiy 46 acres in the northeast quarter (NEI/4) of Secti�
in Mendota Heights, more particulariy shown on the piat as Copperfie
Ad itton, previously Trnown as M_endota Farms; and
WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Deveioper from 114
He�,qhts in or�der to proceed with said development;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the two
as �'ollows:
ta
36,
2nd
1. Developer will petition the City for needed public improvements (Sai itary
Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermains, and Streets). Developer agrees to
pay $7,950.00 escrow to the City as per Ordinance 1503. I
2. Developer will provide at no cost to the City aIl needed te
construction easements to install said improvements and those pe
right of way and easements, necessary for said public improvements.
t,
3. 1l4endota Heights will proceed as expeditiousiy as possible with hearings,�;
or 100% petitions and such additionai proceedings as may be required �
to cause public improvements to be installed. �
4. Developer will proceed immediately to commtssion a registered iand
surveyor to piace enough lot corners so that street centerlines can be
located by City Sta f f.
5. Where site grading occurs, the Developer agrees to protect the
environment by the use of good erosion control methods. Minimum erosion
controi requirements will consist of top dressing, seeding and muiching
of disturbed areas within 30 days of a11 site work and public improvement
completion, as weli as the use of staked hay baies and/or siitation ponds
where concentrated surface water rwioff takes piace (per grading plan).
6. The City is willing to aUow that construction to commence before all
side improvements are compieted with the understanding that there
may be conflicts between the City's contractor and the Developer's and
that any damage done to the public faciiities by the Developer or his
contmctor will be corrected by the City and costs charged to the
Developer.
7. Deveioper acTmowledges that there will be a park contribution due to
the City as per ordinance 301, section 6 as amended by Resolution 80-16.
� That contribution is to be shown on the plat as park and fully meets the
contribution requirement for Copperfield 2nd Addition.
8. Developer agrees to be responsible for the construction costs associated
with incorporating the storm drainage between the ponds in Phases I
and II at no cost to the adjacent property owners.
9. Mendota Heights agrees to respread equaliy, on a per acre basis, the
assessments presently levied against this parcel and the 37 acre Ist.,
Addition this 100 acre parcel owned by Opus Corporation. �:
..r
��
�'
10. The City will construct the pedestrian trails within the street �'ght of
way as shown on exhibit B. The =street trail will be installed with street
construction by the city contractor to a 5 foot width of
construction.
The park trail in ihe Ist Addition continues in the 2nd Addition and wtll
be installed by the city contractor to specifications determined �by the
City with Ist Addition improvements. The cost of the park tra� l is to
be assessed to the Copperfieid Ist Addition project wzth credit given
to the developers park fee along with the value of the 4+ acres Of land
dedicated for parl� If the total contribution of land and traii "cost is
less than that required by City Oroiinance the deveioper wiil �ake up
the dif ference in cash. If the credit exceeds the requirement then the
credit wiil be carried over to the 2nd and 3nai Additions of Copperfie
11. Lots 8-S, Biock 4 of Copperfieid � 2nd Addition are not to be sold or
improved for a 30 day period from Ji.a1e I6, 1986 to July 16, 1986 to
aliow review of a park study. Lots 1-4, Biock 4 and Lot 1, Block 3icannot
be sold or existing buildings removed until authorized by the City Council
for a period of up to 6 months from June 16, 1986 to December 16, 1986.
After December 16, 1986 no conditions upon sale or existing tiuilding
. removal will be required and Copperfieid Associates may proceed with
Iot improvements or saie of Lot 1, Biock 3 and Lots 1-4, Bloc�k 4 of
Copperfield 2nd Addition. �
12. Copperfield 2nd Addition will have the Scenic Easement around ali ponds
used in the lst Addition. The drainage and utiiity easement showed on
the piat is the Scenic Easement boundry. ,
�
COPPERFIELD ASSOCIATES Lyrrc�e Lumber Comp�y �
By �, ��-��. By , . ��
� Its ����LL/`? [�/f ��-•�"/'�-. Its �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
Kevin D. Frazell, City Administrator
AE: i
476
•��
'��• ;
, �:'. s �
�,'t ,}�
<<� ,
`�'
:`� �'�" '
, "sL dYi'.;� �_
' • • .. �! ��*�,.y(.i' d+y� •: ��;,'.i
• ^7�' �r�{ � �
= .�.+ � Y � Y :�.\�M1`�A
-'.Tt�:'$f%.^ik.: j'1'+' i�
k ,'�3t",» ��sY:?'�-1 t
.�t = -'�}��,tl,��.
�,�1 � L�
;,�ir' �M�"^ ➢F,,�+
,� • .;nk^.� : r1;
�:�'�
�[Y� �.[�� .
fi' �N``� Y
q:d,h�,�:�:�� ., .
.� • . � ';'�,;�-i'�� �a�,.�,.�"'s�"
. ' ���.:1:��,� � �'
"� ' �y `.#�"'�k<"': �� e��
� `y��,'{�" �,r^,q�
,�,s-,' ���' N
•.?T � s :��V. � .'�; w
,� �t S'r�'u� G` %S..
. - .i`�' '.,t .
'� �Y�:i
�:� ' -
.�,,. �. � ' , �
'�z
i
m
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 18, 1986
T0: ayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Larry Shaughnessy, Treasurer
SUBJE T: 1986 Improvement Financing .
everal improvement projects are now under construction and we wi
the f nds soon to pay contractors. Projects included at this time inc
opperf ield I $500,000 Under Construction
orth End Streets 200,000 Bid
isanz 130,000 Under Construction
ethodist Church 160,000 Bids 6- 22 - 86
orkton Centre Pointe So. 850,000
eMay Lake I 225,000 Bids 7-22-86 ,
ryc II 300,000
2,365,000
iscount & Expenses 35,000
ssue , $2,400,000
in m
call
ACTI
Imp
11 need
Lude:
e would like to sell the issue August 5th and will be advertising the sale
-July. Maturities of the issue will be from 1988-2003, with a ten year
rovision.
REQUIRED
otion to adopt Resolution No. 86- , calling for public sale of $2,400,000
ement Bonds of 1986. �
LES:m dlr
attac ment
0
88E
EXTI2ACT OE MINUTES OE MEETING OE THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA .
HELD: JULY 1, 1986
.,
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular
>f the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Min
�as duly held at the City Hall in said City on the lst
luly, 1986, at 7:30 P.M.
The following members were present:
nd the following were absent:
Member introduced the fo
solution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE
OF $2,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT
BONDS OF 1986
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
ights, Minnesota, as follows:
�ee t ing
;sota,
�y of '
iny
�ndota
1. It is hereby found, deftermined and declared tha�t this
:ity should issue $2,�00,000 General Obligation Improvement -
3onds of 1986 to defray the expense of the construction�of
�arious improvements in the City.
-2. This Council shall meet at the time and place
�pecified in the form of notice hereinafter contained for the
�urpose of opening and co:�sidering sealed bids for, and�award-
ing the sale of $2,4UO,U00 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
>f 1986 of said City. �
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and direct
:ause notice of the time, place and purpose of said mee
�e published in the official newspaper of the City and
:ommercial West not less than ten days in advance of da
�ale, as provided by law, which notice shall be in
�ubsta�tially the form set forth in Exhibit A attached
d to
ing to
n
e of
iereto.
4. The terms and conditions of said bonds and
the sale thereof are fully set forth in the "Official Terms ,
of Bond Sale" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated �
herein by reference. ,
The motion for the adoption of the foreyoing resolution
was duly seconded by member and upo� a vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
6
�
SUBJ
n
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
June 23, 1986
Mayor, City Council. and City in�a�r
Paul R. Berg, Code Enfpr.cement Officer
:CT: Final Gar.age Inspection - George Noack, Jr. 606 Valley Lane
DISC SSION (
A final insgec�ian was requested and scheduled an June 20, 19$b for the
comp etion of Mr. Noack's garage. I a.nspected both the inside and outside of
the arage. Mr. Noack did not brick the exterior as requested by Gity Council.
Inst ad, he had a s�ucca contractor apply stucco on Che exterior. af his garage.
Mr. oack said that he chose to stucca instead of brick his garage because of the
cost af brick and brick laying. �
ALTE NATI�ES:'
The city Council may; ,
l. Approve the stucco exter.iar.
2. Require the brick as promised by Mr. Noack and required by City Cauncil.
AC:TI N REQUIRED:
Decide whether or nat ta approve the stucca in lieu of brick and direct staff
to a vise Mr. Noack of City Gauncil's decisian.
PRB:
knadlr
0
m
ct•�••r or ri�.Niao�rn itrtc�i�rs -
��,:���c�
April 21. 198b'
T0: Mayor, City Cauticil nrid City f�cimir�istca[ar �����
FR4M•.'�tPaul R. Berg� Code Enforcement 4f£icer � `
SUBJECT: Case t1o. $0-OG, tdoack, Variance Cranted April 15� 1980
, �:;;l,.,;:..:.:�:
."''u�:��` �' ' -�
DISCUSSION '�p�
:rs�On;�April 15, 1980, George Noack Jr. was granCed a variance.to Che zaning
ard'iriances�'to cons'truct a garage on his property at 606 Valley.Lane. �Please.� . .
see attached copy oE letter sent to him dated April 18� 1980. Also see reverse
side -;.please nate Gase No. 80-OG, Noack, an excerpt from the Cauncl.l minutes
dated April 1S, 19$0.
Mr. Noack was required by GiCy Counci.l under conditions of granCing variances
requested to construct the garage of brick to match the existing residence. Fierein
lies'the problem. Mr. Naack has nat requested his fina]. inspectian, nor has he
bricked Che exterior oE his gara�,e as require�3 by City Council. At present, the
garage sCar�ds construcced Wich tar paper and 3.athe strips. The tar paper is
ripped •in several locacions on �he extera.or wall a£ the garage. I have contacted '
Mr. Naack many times at�out finishing this garage. Despite repeated promises of
compl.'e�tion�, Che garage remains unbricked. On ApriL 21st, I again asked and he
' said'�he didn`t know crhen he'I1 do it. � `
RECOMMENDATZON
Sta£f fee].s Chat six years i�as been more chan sufficient t�.me Ca all.aw Mr.
' Noack to complete Che bricki.ng af ti�e garage. We recommend that Council authorize
' us to send a l.etter noGifying �fr. No�nck that he is to complete bricking of the
�arage and request a final insnection uithin 30 days af reccipt of the letter, or
thaC the City will turn 'the macCer over to chc City Accorney's affice for prosec-
ution.
ACTION REQUIRED ' ' • •
';-. __..'--+.'..� .. _, ...�_..x�.�.:r_--.r..a ;.,;•r ._ -^.'. -- - .. . . • -„ . _ _..._ __.. _.. ,._
_ --,,.r--..�z . + . ..---�-�-•.,� ___._......,.-.-..^.,,� .
. """""Tf'Gonncil -car►curs�•vith the •scaEE- reCommendaCion„�itrstiould..adop�.a motion _ ,
direcCin� the buiZding oCf icril ca senci st,ci� a lecter to Mr. Noack, and if Che
terms arc: not met, turn the macrer over co the City Attor.ney for prosecution.
0
�
�
F'ftBIKT3F: m<rtd2r
aCCaChmenC
��
�
. � . ;
. . �l. fl C� �/�� �'1�1G�Ul`lr .���'l. CJ�
f � �
� 0/1NK [IUILUINr
73 SOU(H PLAZA DRIVE A ME�IDOTA HEIGISTS, MiNr�ESO'
I TELEPHONE (6121 4S2-IEi50
Mr. George Noack, Jr.
G06 Valley Lane
Mendota lieights, MN SSllf3
Dear George:
April 1£3, 19Q0 ,
This will formally advise you of Cit� Council action on your application i
Eor variance. At the regular City Council meeti�ig held on Apri� 15, the '
Council considered and approved your application to construct a 24 foot by 37.
foot qarage at 606 Valley I,��ne, •.�it}i the following conditions: that the
structure be constructed of brick to match the existing residenc;e; tt�st a
�single 18 by 10 foot overhead door be installed; that the ceiling height be
limited to 12 feet; that the roof �eak be no higher than 15 feet�; that the
door be residential-type wood panel construction; and that the 25 ton truck
;;;; be allowed on the premises on the condition that the owner uill iot conduct
,;�� a commercial business from the site.
r�
Please be advised that prior to construction oP your garage; it will be
necessary for you or your contractor to acquire the required bui�dinq permit.
If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me.
.:f�
S:madlr
f �
Very truly your's,
i��u-J �%, �1.{t,c.t��
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk I
S. Enclosed Por your inEormation is an excerpt from the April 1�5th Council
minutes. Pleasc note, they havc not been ap��roved yet.
erGc .
�t
: :�;.'.:�i
�• ..
�::.:.
`�.
7
1
' . .
.— . i�l� . i_�uil Ilu������, .'!)::I ',�u�.li Vi�.Cc�r•i,�, ,:°i:�ci (or a_c:l,�ri� ir;`/,;.iu:
I}1 ttl�; ��Gt'li! SC�:lC�� CV� �:'� c't!!!� �l'�i:.'fi 1'l�lcl�. �)r.'il(_'f 1 L �1C (�(!�'1''/Q', 11'':
tli�� ���'c� jCc: t, 5 i rier: n � ti,'�� i rr��r��� �ir't7I)!+'i�i t�Y i; t;�:c1 Otti li i; ��r������ �
,��• i U�' lU I.li� r.U�l;;:�'u�' �. i un �� I� ll�r: c1r'd i n�iy�� SyS Cc:m. A�.
�yes . 5
}'� - : Piay s : 0
r•��-. r•�a�•ty Ev�nS, ?35 l•1. Cottvqc, 5tdC��1 Lhdt hC i; (7r'opr�S�.�1 '•
�Ssessed it�t' }fis ettLi:'t. �i.��•t:t;l t�f ��r-o��er�Cy evctt LilUtrc�ii a f�tc�h
vo 1 tage poo-�er I i n� runn i ng throuc�h h i s property does no L� 1 1 cr
d�:vt� l U{�z�tert C. 1{�.� S ta l,e;! Ll��t t, he dut�s r�c, C f�.'�.3 l tlta t Litc 5 L�r'ta ��,
will benefit his pra��er4y. Fie also asked �•�hether thc �rajcc;r
Yt0U2i� IIciYC been iliiti.�tc.�d if tlit� 11��4:oGa's /ldults faciliLy ha�i
not t,cen ap{�r�v��c1, a��ci as�:cci ;eve��ai C;UCStinnS ab�ut intr:�•�sc
CpUtlCl�tiic�ti t•ier�tensotta arr-ived at f3:15 o`clack P.hi.
Reverent� Johr� Carlss���, expresseci cor�cern tlxat thc no►-th r�,�tr
to the (Zoy�31 Redeemer s i �e hr�d ��ot be�n r-cturn�d t� the !:oncfi �
it ��rdS in ��rior to Coris4rtrcti�rl t�f titc i����r�veatent;.
t•Ir. Larrrettce �Cl��Ilta, 1Q�3� V�iil t?�'ive� st�ted Lhdt his pc't���e��'
is affected f�y surface ��ur�-off at thc: ��rescnt ti�ne as it �:��s
t0 StQrttt SQ,ter toriSC�'uLtlon. t�nd 8S!c2t� f0�" <`Urth�r Cldri; ir_):
on tlie r•aCio►�alr� invuiveci in 1.he aE;G�lication of t�•�o dift��►-�>»t
st�r,u ,et�er ratcs.
hlayur Locl;t•�uud ��ked �•rl�eliic:�• t}iert� �•,�.�•c any addition��l qu�:�::
or coni���enis , arid s 4a te�i tila t any�rze c: i s31 i r�g to da sa nia f s�:'.::
a�ritten connuents, �bjectiar�s or complaints to the City C�
be for-e l�pr i 1 24 ti� . 1!e s ta ted tha t s ta f f res ponses to Lh�
couin�unications would be r-eferred to the Council for discu,>;•
on tlay 6th.
Tliere bei ng no furtl�ei� ques t i ons or con��en ts , Ma�or Loc'r.:� ���J
nrove� that ti�e i��ai�ing be closed at II:58 o'ciack P.h1.
Councilman Losleben seconded the motian.
CASE �d0. 30-p4, F1r. George Pdoack, Jr. , was present ta request apprpval of var
• td0�1CY, ta allow cor�structian of a garage at 60G Valley �ane. Ti�e
' Council acknoti•rledged and discussed a memo from the City P1ann
reyarding the proposed structure, t�r. Ploack stated that he
concurs ��i th the Pl anner' s reconimenda tions , and tl�a t t�e ti•ri i�
conduct a business f►-orn the site.
�<�
;; ��. , _ +
,. i'� . l)
After discussion, Caunci�lman Losleben moved approval of a t,�:
foat sideyard setb�3cf: varit�r;ce and an if3 PaaC rear yai-d var•:
ta alloti•� constructiUn of a 2�1 foot by 32 foot yaraye at 600 '.
�art� �ased on Llie t`�llati�rit�c� C4t1CI1t10t15: CIIdC the structurc `.f�
construct�d of bricE: to inatch th�� �xistiri residence• tha� •.y
.. �; i rtcj ('r 1.�l.ay i ur.a t���it.�•I�c���<1 cl�(7r' I)C i n:, ta 1 l c�d ; tha t C1���
c�� i 1 i ny he.�.i c�1� t i„� i i r.� i L���1 ta i�' f'ee t: ti7 a C tiye roo f�ea k�>e
ii i�llicr Cli��ii 1'� i ���_ l: t.h,i t t.!�e �fuoi• !��� rc� i d��n t i a 1- Cy;�e ti•,
.!�
��,�rrcl tai�;ti•t�t.;i�,r�; <:,4ci t}i��L ,i ?', tori �r-rac�• �r� z311o:•,��ci car� �
�)r'/?Illi Sl?5 lltl L!lc�' �:UIIr1 I f: tOli I.flcl � f.l!C ll:J�t�i' t'1i 1 1 I10 i. �:Urll'�Ut:!. ,.
�..�tl:ttii't'{ I J � i.I,', � �:+�`,•, i !'tiH: a.�it: � I �+: .
,;.iti��)�• I.�ii.l�•�c�c��) `',�:�.��tl�ircl t.li�: i::�):.iUn