The URL can be used to link to this page

1986-06-031. all to Order. 2. oll Call. 3. �Agenda Adoption. 4. 5. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JiTNE 3, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. oval of the May 21st Board of Review Minutes. Consent Calendar: � /} a. b: d. Acknowledgement of May 13 Park and Recreation Commission Milutes. Acknowledgement of May 27 Planning Commission Minutes.:� Acknowledgement of May Code Enforcement Monthly Report. I Approval of the List of Licenses. nd of Consent Calendar. 6. ublic Comments 7. ntroductions 8. ARING: a. Rey,uest o Vacat (.1 ent Street. (Resolution No. 86-40). �� ,� t ' • � $�,�, f'n' hed an New Busin�ss 9. n i i s . /Y�tZ� 7:45 P.M. � Eve green Knolls Feasib'lity po t. (Res�j,�lu ion No. 86-41)'. . c��,,�/ . Preservati n of Darsow Farm. � o�,- Case N. 86- , Brodd, R quest for Lot Division. (Resolution No. 86-42). � g Case No. 6-13, ' illman, Request for Varia _� 3 a!� �'�i � J'yyC... ..�� d,�/�� 3� �'G 3. 2 0: S p� i gn Ordinan�e. (Ordinance No. 227). d ' -// Clarification of Street Lighting Policy. ^�� Ou i City Utility Hooku Poli .( so ution No. 86-43).,�� 72Z�e�:r. ' � �. Fire Hydrant at IOS Site. ` �-cy...�� -o�+� . � �A o� �On of City V'sion Statement. -� �X�`��,;��—� �� "� � �J-�i,� Council omments l a��7�/ / Ad j ourn . � / / : v ` '��.`�� - - (( � �� . i °.�.� r � �� . 3a 4 T0: FROM� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor and City Council' Kevin D az,� Cit dminis�tor CT: Add-on Agenda•for June 3 June 3, 1986 Four items, two of them for the consent calendar, are recomme addi ion to this evening's agenda. Additional information is also for tem 9b. 3. t�genda Adopt2on . for �mitted It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda with the addition of items 5e, f, 9dt-�,. and 9j. 5e. Acknowledgement of Letter From Margaret Perron, 2370 Highway 55,, Concernin LeMay Lake. I Please se e attached letter. Council should merely acknowledge receipt of the etter. 5f . List of Claims See attached. 9b. Preservation of Darsow Farm I Attached is a memo from City Attorney Tom Hart, describing legal consider- ati ns in the preservation of the Darsow Farm. City Planner Howard Dahlgren had intended to visit the farmsite last Satur- day morning, and prepare a memo for Council consideration. However, pending leg 1 action precluded him from being able to make the on-site visit. City Attorney Hart will, of course, update Council on the legal�proceedings tha t ook place at 9:00 A.M. this morning concerning this matter. 9d�. Request for Purchase of Fire Department Clothing Please see attached memo from Fire Chief John Maczko. Assistani Chief Ler s will be present to answer Council questions. ACT If Council concurs with the recommendation, it should pass a motion authoriz- ing purchase of the helmets and clothing items from Minnesota Fire ari d Safety, in he amount of $3,863.20. 9i• Receipt of City Hall Report and Update for Future Joint Meeting � At this evening`s meeting, you are receiving the final report oi the City Hal Committee, including its recommendations. Council should acknowledge - 2 - � e receipt of that report, and.establish a future date for a joint meeting with the City Hall Committee to go over the contents of the report. Chair Stan Gustafson has suggested an evening dur'ing the week of June 23. KDF:madlr _ . _ __ _ _��---�5�' . '.� 1,� `l �' i J:J �- _ -. ___ �._----__-----. ___ _ _ __._ _ .__ _ _ _ _ -, --..� � _ - �. �-��.� �. � �. ��;- � � � � ,��..� .� : _ - �,��.�. ,�. , � ��- �� , .�.�--- ,�:�. : . - �� _ ,�-� � � �- � - ,�-��._�._ -�------ ------ - --. _ _ ._-- --- -- - - - - - -. - - - - ,.� `�-, °-�'.�-a-�-� �� ,�, � ,�'`-� � �� •'�•� a-�, -'�`'`� �.� --� ,, � � c:�--.�.�� -v—P� :� ' .�. rr� ' �.�' �`�--v� . , , . _ .- t � _� � . ��.-`�- --.. __.. _ . -- � ;, �, . � � �� - � 3 �� o ,�--� .s s - Srf- �'.'�'�� 5�� s� s �? d iG�J l 1 V-Hf1I111L1 `��/2i�I6 CLAIMS LIST ` 15-Engr � ,%�� 20-Palice �-� A?�OUfJT 25. 0 25. 0 * -- �. Q 5. > 0 R.� l�l. 0 151. 0 *�- 15. 0 15� 0 *� 178, 0 �78. 0 �-� 16. 0 16. � r/ 1:463.. 5 1e46�. S *i 806. 0 8 4 E� .. Q *�.. 1,905. 0 1�9Q5. 0 */ � _� 5 . � 17r 5 25. 9 *.,� 1,395. 0 2 � 395. 0 *� S. 0 .. _23.;. .� _ 9� 0 171 . 5 39.45 95. 0 3. 0 2: 0 352.20 */ 34 • 675. � Q 6,5p0.f�0 41�175.II0 +�,� 3.35 b.T� 3.01 -.� 13.70 *r 4 .��= - - • - - 6 .I7 3 ,. NtC �C REC 30-Fire 4 0—CEO J�VQO� IT�M ]ESCRIPTION GART'LK� CONST R=D 1/2 C�cPOSIT N=:AL(H EDJ SVC I�VC MTC AMM T,-iE LAWN 3ARCi_R 6iAT= ��i02KS STf� s�s r�:�� 5121 MT� APR 5 UC NaTL FIRE ?R�T ASSN ��tVEt�AE. AMERI-DAT.� SYSTE�I Ct}MPUTE� EQ D000 T�CNNICAL CORf' COhI'tlTE3 S�I TNZRO PLAV=T ilHLSL MONITQRS P� t3`X ��o�x SYST�M RESflU?2CE Ri�D ;.OPIE� SP�Y Ra�D 40PIE�t SPL.Y � �Z R&D COPIER SP�Y RKD CUPIER SP�Y f2&D COPIE� SPLY R&D CUPIER SPLY RKL� Ct�PIE� SP�Y R�D COPIER SPLY� GITY W ST PAIi� CI TY �1 ST PAU� AT�T AT'&T AT&T P�-i(3TOS PN0;0"a � COM?tfT�R EQ COPItR �APER �.. CO�PI�ft_ pAPER CDPIER PAPER _ Ct�PIER PAPER C�JPI�r2� �t�AP�'R CDPIER PAPER COPI£!2 F'APER C�4PTER �'APER ` l�s� �Is� � 1986 DISP LD �ALLS L.D �ALLS C.D CAi.LS AT & T INrQ SYST�MS MAY SYC Lep� au. naa�r�age 60-Utilities 78-Parks $0-Placming 90-Animal Control ACCOUNT iVO� �I;� 85-42t33-�324 �pZ �J5-44�2-105-1` 41-44=�0-110-1.[ �J1-440Q-11�-1t 01-4335-3i 5-3i O1-4402-Q30-3L 12-4600-000-OC oi-�3oi-i�o-ic 12-4600-000—OG �1-43E35-030-3C 01-4305-030-30 12-4bQ0-000—Oa Q1-430p-030-3C f31-43E10-040-40 01-43�0-0$0—$a 01-430Q-110-10 0"l-43�J5—Q20-2a 05-4 �t30-105-1� lO-4JOO—000-00 35-430Q-06Q-60 0�--�2��=o�2o=ao 0�--�2�s-a�o-�a U1-4210-020-2� 01-4210-030-3p 01-4210-110-10 fl1-422 0-050-5t3 � �IOUiV T 23.`T8 11.32 161.30 *: y`�.�0 ' 99.D0 �� i • � � d' , �H�CK RE:�IST�R �Er100� ITEM DESCRIPT:ION , ACCOUNT N0. Itvv. UNITED CE�V� TRUSTEE JUN PR�M 01-4132-070- � 1 UNIT�D CE�lT TRUSTEE JUN PREM 15-4132-060• 1 UNIT�D WAY-ST PAUL JUN �ONTR 01-20?'Q-000-Ofl , 131.20 IdEST=RV LI=E INS CO JUN PRE�`1 01-4132-030-3G : 131 . 2 0 *� �' 6�r657.54 FUND O1 TUTAL GEPJERAI FUNU bOb.49 FUVU 03 TOTAL ,_ bdA,TE�_,R=UENU= FUNJ__, ,_ _ , ,_ ,� 3,383.02 � � FU�1l�J 0� TOTAL ^EN6R�=NT�RPRISE ;� 122n20 FU�tD 10 TOTAL S?E:,IAL PARK �UND � 4,763.0_5 FUNO 12 TOTA� EQUI'i�E:VT C�RTIFICA7ES . _ , . � 1,529.37 FUND 14 T17T�1L CONSDLIOATED t7E8T SERVIC 56,021.56 FUND 15 TOTAL SEu�R UTiLITY !� 1�082.�5 FUND 16 TOTAL TID i79-7/51-4/82-2/82-6 ; - --.__.._._._._____.,.r.- .. .._..,..__._._..� ........ .. ..._..._ _.. .. _ _.. . _. .�..__......._.._.....--.�._._r.._..._..�...._._......_......_..__._....___...__�..___._...._.- - 2,083.33- FUND 17 �OTAL UTIL RES�RU�. 272.?5 FUND 21 �OTAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - -2-31 ._ ..__..._. _.__ FUVD __8_0 TOTAL _. __...___, ._.I65-6LE..MAY , i.A_KE___Y •------. ,�;. ; 102..15 FU.VD 85 iOTAL I85-4C0?FERFIELO TANDEM � � 1 2 �, �,4 5 9 . 7 6_. ._ . ___._. _ T OT A_l_. _ _ .. . .._._._...... ... . .._. ._. .. . . ._.. .__ .. ._ ._.. .�, . .. ._ � MANUAL CHECKS ,; 1�1086 25.50 Minn Green Exp E6 Regr. ^ y � 11087 370.74 NSP 6/2/ Due Date �' 11088_�___. 51.92 �,�DOER, SS_ Div,., _r.. .. Medicar.e._5/23,P.R..._._..._....,....�..___......... � 11089 2,939.23 " 5/23 FICA ^+ � 11090 5,418.73 DC Ba�.k S/23 FIT :� __ 11091 _,.,.� 5Z5.00._..�._._ _"_.. _ _ - .-- - 5/23 _P..__R.�.Deductions...--. ,._ _ .. ._.._. ..__. _.._.._... ..._; ; 11092 2,599.31 SCCU " ' 11093 25,169.16 City M.H. Payroll Acct 5/23 Net Payroll � 11094 ,,.,�._,�15.0_..0.,0. Mn.,_Dept_Health___,_.,_._... .... .Plan_.reuiew__fee.�---.-.--.•--� 4-�-w---- �- -- ----�-_.....____.._. � .. . _..__ . , : ... ..�. .. �.u.., 37.,299.59 w... . _ _ _ __ ._. . __ __._ _ . �...__.....,---.. ._- _.... _ ..___ _., .._.u_., G.T. 163,759.35 , t� r� � T0: FROM; One that I wo insu equi that six f or CITY OF MEND.OTA HEIGIiTS MEMO June 3, 1986 Mayor, City Council and City ��t�ator .% I wo�Fire $4, OOII all o theiri not a JM:ma Johm,Maczko, Fire Chief . Purchase of Personal Protective Clothing In 1986, we budgeted $2,0OO��for the replacement of clothing for � hing that was not .budgeted for was the replacement of 22 firefigti will not meet OSHA standards for structural firef ighting as of Ji ld like to propose that we'purchase these 22 helmets this year. e that we stay in compliance. We have obtained three bids from t ment suppliers and we have examined other equipment needs, beside need replacement. Instead of replacing the personal protective c iref ighters this year.,.we feel we can get by with replacement of our f iref ighters and spend the rest on the helmets. bids for the required equipment are as follows: innesota Fire and Safety id Central Fire ISCO $3,863.20 3,896.80 3,898.15 Ld like to recommend that we award the bid to the low bidder of M and Safety for $3�,863.20. The $1,863.20 overrun would be deducte 0 i.n hose that we had budgeted for in 1986. This purchase will a f our firef ighters are receiving the best possible equipment avai protection. I also feel that the deducted amount from the hose ff ect our operations this year. c? lr ix f ire�f ighters . ting helmets nuary 1, 1987. This will hree f ire s helmets, lothing for the clothing ' innesota d from ssure that lable f or budget will � Pur Hei Sou to Page No. May 21, 1986 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Annual Board of Review Held Wednesday, May 21, 1986 ant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City�of Mendota ts met as the Board of Review at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 750 Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Lockwood calledlthe meeting der at 7:43 o'clock P.M. The ollowing members were present: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hart ann and Witt. � Mayo Lockwood turned the meeting over to Assistant County Assessor Bill Peterson. Asse sor Peterson informed the audience that he and several other assistant assessors were present to review the estimated 1986 market values. Mr. Peterso� advised the audi nce that a complete revaluation was performed in Mendota Heights�last summer. He a ked for general questions and took specif ic questions in order of roster sig- natu es. He also noted. that for 1986, the median level of assessment�in Mendota Heig ts is 877. He noted that by law, the State won't accept less thin 85� market valu . A ma ority of the residents were from the Eagle Ridge complex who exp'ressed concern over the 10% increase they received in 1986, and the 10�' increase for11985. After many questions and concerns, County Assessor Peterson suggested that several residents of E gle Ridge meet with the assessors to try to resolve their concerris. He also advi ed the audience that if anyone is still dissatisf ied, they can appeal to the Coun y Board of Equalization at their meeting on July 8th. I The ity Council, acting as the Board of Review, received a statementlfrom Mr. Robert Glis inski, 1812 South Victoria Road, objecting to the high market value of his home. 1 Counc�ilmember Cummins was excused at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Peterson and the assistant assessors then met with individual property owners wishi � to discuss valuations. I CITY IS ; i ADJOU N Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ATTES : ION STATEMENT The City Council reviewed and discussed a draft copy of the City's Vision Statement. After review,and minor adjustments, it was forwar de d to t he City A dminis tra tor for distribution to the Planning Commission members. Roberk G: Lockwood, Mayor. I There being no further business to come bef�ore the Board, Councilmember Hartmann moved that the meet�ng be adjourned. Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Mary Ann DeLaRosa, De;�puty Cler.k ; held call� Dambi Admi� work� B-A FOR FACI Ayes: Nays: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, MAY 13, 1986 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Park and Recreation C on Tuesday, May 13, 1986, in the City Hall Council Chambers. Ch �d the.meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The following members were �rg, Doff ing, Knittig, Leffert, Schneeman, and Singer. Also pres �aistrator Frazell, Public Works Director Danielson and Public Wor �r Blum. Also present was Barry Warner, from Barton-Aschman, Ass Ayes: Nays: (Knit COPPE MENT OPOSAL INT ATHLETIC TY AT SIBLEY 7 0 A ESTATES �mmission was �irman Stein �resent•. Stein, �nt were City cs Maintenance �ciates. The Commission discussed at length a proposal presented by Barry Warner to enter into a contract to assi.st the City and School District ��197 in negotiating a joint venture agreement. Singer moved, seconded by Schneeman to recommend that the City Council accept the Barton-Aschman propo�al at a cost not to exceed $3,120 plus expenses. Commissioner poffing reported on his meetings� with District ��197 staff concerning the joint venture to build additional athletic and park facilities. The Commission recommended that staff . try to obtain a committment from the School District as soon ; as possible on the project. Mr. Howard Bream, a developer of Mendakota Estates planned unit development made a presentation regarding his proposed ; project, which is located south of the f ire station, on Dodd, between Creek and Hokah. He also disc+ssed a park contribution which was to be 407 of the gros� acreage. , Motion by Leffert, seconded by Schneeman to accept the recommendation of Howard Bream and to recommend that the City Council also accept his proposal of park dedication property for Mendakota Estates planned unit developmerit. 4 2 ig absent from room) Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 DEVELOP- Mr. Dick Putnam, representing the Copperf iel a pr.esentation concerning Phase II area of t at this time that Ms. Kay Laudon made an app Commission to designate certain land around farm house and buildings; to be eventually m historic site. The gavel was passed to Vice Schneeman. Jim Stein made a motion, seconde r.ecommend to the City Council that a study b concept of a historical site in this area. would not be financed by Park Commission fun need for a neighborhood park is recognized f area of the Copperf ield development. Howeve is not designated at this time. Development, made plat. It was ! 1 to the 100 year old e into a hairperson by Leffert, to made of the wever, this study ; and 'that a ' the Phase II � the location May 13, 1986 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes Page Two MISCELLANEOUS Discussion continued on a proposed future park bond refer- endum. Discussion concerning a meeting being held by Dakota County on bikeway plans. The Commission voted a resolution of approval of the plan and Chairperson Stein appointed Cbmmissioner poff ing to attend the May 15th meeting. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned to June 10, 1986. Respectfully submitted, Robert Leffert, Secretary RL:madlr CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 27, 1986 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission w orde by Chairperson Morson at 8:00 o'clock P.M. The following membe pres nt: Morson, Burke, Krebsbach, McMonigal, Duggan. Henning had advi ed the Commission that .he would be unable to attend. Also pre City Planner Dahlgren, City Administrator Frazell, and Public Works D s called to s were � nt were ector Danielson. APPR VAL OF Minutes of the April 22 meeting had been submitted previously. MIN ES Commissioner McMonigal moved that the minutes be approved as submitted. Commissioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: 6 . Nays: 0 ' CASE 86-11, BREAM HOMES, Chairperson Morson called the meeting to ord CUP OR PUD, VARIANCE, pose of a public hearing to consider an appl SUBD VISION Bream Homes. Present to discuss this were d Bream an� Planner Jim Hi11. Mr. Hill indica proposal was to develop 52 acres, with 34 si platted immediately, and 122 apartments to b future, currently platted as an outlot. He park dedication and dedication of a portion to the City. r for the pur- cation from veloper Howard ed that their gle-family lots built in the lso noted the f Roger's Lake Mr. Hill said that the property would be served off new Men- dakota Drive, which would also serve the newiclubhouse for Mendakota Country Club. Future apartment aciess would be directly off Dodd Road. Mr. Hill said that in 1981, the City had app unit development for 180 attached units on t The current proposal is now for 156 units, w variance above what would normally be allowe Al]. single family lots meet the minimum 15,0 requirement, and some are as large as 39,000 an average in excess of 20,000 square feet. oved a planned is same property. ich is a 16 unit in the R-1 zone. 0 square foot square feet, with The development proposes a 40% park dedication, plus nine acres of Roger's Lake, and it was noted that�the developer will include construction of a 6 foot bituminous pathway through the park. Outlot C of the development is proposed to be deeded to Mendakota Country Club as part of their driving range. It was indicated that the 122 apartment units would likely not be built for three to five years, and that t�ere is no interest in senior citizen housing providers in constiucting on this site at this ti.me. He said that they were before the Planning Cbmmission to request a conditional use permit for the PUD� approval of the overall sketch plan, preliminary plat and preliminary May 27, 1986 Planning Minutes Page Two w development plan for the.single family subdivision and park dedication, plus a variance from the 140 up to 156 units. The development is proposed for the west side of Dodd Road, between Creek and Hokah Avenue. Chairperson Morson noted that seven lots along th e lake would have a severe slope toward the lake. Mr. Hill responded that they did not propose any f illing of these lots, but the development would accommodate the slope. Chairperson Morson asked that the record note that the developer does not have any intent to seek future fill permits for these properties. Commissioner Burke asked about the benef it of dedicating 9.3 acres of Rogers Lake to the City. Mr. Hill responded that since Rogers Lake is a public access lake, it would be virtually impossible for parties who privately own a part of Rogers Lake to get liability insurance on that. Planner Dahlgren noted that the Lakeridge PUD which had been approved five years earlier also dedicated a portion of Rogers Lake to the City, and that was an appropriate way to go. Planner Dahlgren went on to comment that it is appropriate that the proposed park be contiguous to Dodd Road, so as to provide benef it to the adjoining Friendly Hills neighborhood. He said that this would be a good future location for senior citizen housing, because of its proximity to Mendota Plaza shopping center and that the open space as proposed would enhance the golf course and the single family development. He said that 122 apartments, given so much open space around it, is not a significant density. Commissioner Frank questioned the City's control over Outlot C as would be deeded to Mendakota. Planner Dahlgren responded that it could be developed only as approved in the PUD . Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, indicated that he did not think the Commission had advertised this as a public hearing for a rezoning or amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, but merely as a planned unit development hearing. He said the land use plan and zoning are currently for single family homes, but in effect, the conditional use permit to provide a PUD for apartments would be in violation of the Compr ehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Chairperson Morson responded that his impression was that i under the PUD process, where the density was consistent with the underlying R-1 zoning, a rezoning or amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would not be required. Mr. Friel said that he thought the public had not been provided adequate opportunity to be heard on what in effect is a rezoning, and also questioned the justification for exceeding the density requirement. May ' E. �L 27, 1986 Planning Minutes `�'. � . /' � , � i �' Page Three Citp.Planner Dahlgren responded that under a developer prepares a plan that conforms t controls, and a`rezoning is not required. he offered Ivy Hills Townhouses and Somerse both of which are in R-1 di.stricts. He ind justif ication for the extra I6 unit varianc that could have been included as part of th PUD had recently been sold to the golf cour remain as open space. Mr. James Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, questi� density would be on the buildable portion o in a density per acre figure, and what it w Lakeridge PUD. Mr. Hill responded that in PUD plat in 1981, there were 180 units on 6 the lake. He said that under City of Mendo ordinance, density is calculated in gross a of-way dedication. Such calculations, acco yield 140 units on this site, and the devel for a variance up to 156. he PUD process, the density s examples, 19 condominiums, cated that the was that land acreage for this e, but would ned what the the property s under the the Lakeridge acres, including a Heights zoning ea minus right- ding to Mr. Hill, per is asking Mr. Russell Wahl, 631 Callahan Place, askedlwhy a cul-de-sac in excess of City standards was being allowed on this property, when City Planner Dahlgren had opposed a cul-de-sac on Callahan Place. He also asked where the storm sewer drainage would be going, and whether it wasn't the developer's responsibility to keep all such drainage onlhis project. Mr. Lou Brenner, 1722 Lansford Lane, representative of Mendakota Country Club, spoke in favor of the proposed PUD. He also indicated that Mendakota Drive would serve the new Mendakota Country Club clubhouse. I In response to Mr. Wahl's questiQn, Chairpe indicated that developers are not required of their stormwater flow on their own prope to see that it is property disposed of thro improvement project. City Planner Dahlgren frequently water is collected in a retentio� then metered.out slowly to larger bodies of Minnesota River, Rogers Lake, etc. �son Morson o maintain all ty, but merely gh a public indicated that pond on site, water, i.e., the Chairperson Morson said that he thought thelproposed Mendakota Drive was not stxictly a cul-de-sac, since it does provide a continuous driving surface, and noted thai the City police and fire departments felt it was an acceptable arrangement. Mr. Gene Schiff, 2196 Aztec Lane, questioned what type of apartments would be built. Developer Bream �esponded that this was merely a sketch plan proposal, and he had no details, although he envisioned it would be three sto�y garden apart- ments. Mr. Losleben questioned why the density was being increased in violation of City zoning ordinances. Chair Morson responded that a 16 unit variance was not a violation,�and that he felt May 27, 1986 Planning Minutes Page Four it was reasonable, and that the Planni.ng Commission had to exercise some judgement. He noted that Lexington Heights had received a density variance when it was built. ` Mr. Losleb.en-responded that he was opposed to using the City ordinances as just a guideline, and not a fixed rule. Mr. Friel added that he felt the ordinances are not guidelines, but have the force of law. Mrs. Mary Fischer, from Hokah Avenue, said.�that she would like to see more informa.tion on the plans for the apartments. Mr. John Moy, 796 Hokah Avenue, offered that he did not wish to have apartments next to him. Mr. Brenner said that if the 16 units were an issue, Mendak- ota could deed back the six acres to Bream so that they could have a density'credit, but that such a process seems silly. He added that Mendakota intends to ke�p the land as open space. Mr. Morris Friedman, 789 Hokah Avenue, asked what the overall density was. Mr. Hill responded that there would be 122 units of apartments, and 34 single family��homes for a total 156 dwelling units. In exchange for the 16 unit variance, he noted that the developer is offering a 40% park dedication and construction of a bituminous trail. Mrs. Julie Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, said that citizens had been told by the Council that the PUD process is in the ordinance to prov ide greater control and to provide for a specif ic development with detailed approvals. She felt that the designation of the multi-family area was too vague to be part of a PUD approval at this time, and questioned whether it could be partially accepted with the multi-family approval to be considered later. City Planner Dahlgren responded that it would be possible to do that, but that even under the usual PUD process, there would have to be a further public hearings at the time the multi-family area was developed. Developer Bream said that the development of the multi- family housing would be four to five years down the road, and Bream Homes would not be the developer. Mr. Friel asked just what development plans were being approved this evening. Planner Dahlgren responded that they were according to the PUD ordinance, and would be the sketch plan and preliminary plat for the single-family development. Mr. Losleben reiterated that he was totally opposed to changing the density under a variance process. He also said that when the Eide subdivision was approved, the City was talked out of providing a connecting road north into the Perkegwin property, which later proved to be a mistake. He felt that a road connecting two developments should be constructed to eliminate the large cul-de-sac. r` M•' p � .. . . � ; • . ' ' May �7, 1986 Planning Minutes, Page Five City Administrator Frazell responded that t to purchase a lot in the Eide subdivision f recently before the City Council, and the C to make such a purchase. Developer Bream i would be very much opposed to making such a of the cost and the compromise of the priva hood. � issue of whether access was ncil.declined icated that they onnection, because of the neighbor- Commissioner Burke asked about what happens iif there was a fire, or if the NSP electric or gas lines ca.used a problem, rahether it might not be difficult for peoplej to get in and out of the development. � City Administrator Frazell read for the Comm'ission the portion of the City zoning ordinance which allows the variance process, basically stating that there must be a hardship, and not merely a convenience to the developer. � Mr. Wahl said that the Cherry Hills 2nd Addi�tion had to have two accesses, and that he felt this development should do likewise. Mr. Losleben added that Curley's�Addition was also originally built with only one access, but great pressure came to bear to add a second access�later. Ms. Judy McCardle, 2159 Fox Place, spoke in opposition to the proposed multi-family designation. She said�that perhaps if it could be a senior citizen development it would be OK, but that,is totally unknown at this point. I Ther e being no further questions or comments�from the public, Commissioner Frank moved to close the public�hearing at 9:37 o'CloCk P.M. I Co�issioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: Nays: Commissioner Duggan moved to deny the application. Motion died for lack of a second. � Commissioner Burke requested the reasons forlthe motion to deny. Commissioner Duggan responded that he was concerned about the road access,• safety, and that there were a number of questions still to be answered before he would be ready to approve the development. � Mr. Friedman indicated that the TH149 task force is recently being formed, and its decisions could impactlthe decision on this development. Co�issioner Burke'moved to recommend appro ional use permit for a planned unit develop single family homes and the designation of units on Outlot A, the sketch plan, prelimi plan, and preli.minary plat, and denying the the extra 16 apartment units. Commissioner Frank seconded the motion. Ayes� S Nays 1, Duggan 1 of the condit- nt for 34 6 apartment ry development ariance to allow May 27, 1986 Planning Minutes Page Si.x Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend amending the motion to add a condition that a second access point be required to be connected to Swan Drive or some other suitable location. Co�issioner Burke seconded the motion. Ayes: 3 Nays: 3, Krebsbach, McMonigal,and Morson Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Commissioner Krebsbach moved that the City and developer a second access. Commissioner Duggan secon ded to amend the motion to indicate should pursue the possibility of the motion. City Administrator Frazell explained tliat when the plans for development of the apartment complex come back before the City, issues as to whether it would be senior citizen, and whether it would be rental or condominium would not be things the City could legally enforce. CASE 86-10, CON70R Chairperson Morson began by mentioning that the City had CORP., CUP FOR PUD, not resolved the issue of the aircraft noise guidelines with REZONING, SUBDIJISION the Nietropolitan Council, and had not passed the ordinances HEARING necessary to accomplish the requested rezoning. Therefore, he indicated to the applicant that he would ask tor a motion to deny the request until the ordinai:::es �re completed. Mr. Mike Thompson, Condor Corporation in�lic^.te� that t?�e� had applied last year and that the City's Comp�eh:ns�ve -:ri_�. P.��n :ha:,ges ha� been approved in October. He addbd t._at =he ��trcp�li..an Cou,icil haci asiced for a solution to the aircraft noise pr.o�' em, aci�? t=at �he :.it; Council had withdrawn its comprehensive �;la�_ am�.r_d�en� �rom furt::er :�pp::oval until that issue had been resoive:i, He asked that the City Planner's staff report be entered as a part of the public hearing record for this item, (attached). He said that the developer, Condor Corporation now owns 118 acres and feels that their present proposal can meet any noise standards that may be adopted. Mr. Tim Erkilla, Westwood Planning and Engineering, indicated that the present proposal is to use the land up to 100 feet west of Huber Drive and it would include two ponding out lots, one for recreation and one for use of future projects. Mr. Erkilla said that the previous input they had received from the City was to lower the density on the project, which he said was substantially less than the earlier apartment proposal. He said the present proposal is for two to four unit attached single family residences, done at a density of 5.5 units per acre. This is 150 units on 33.7 acres. He said there would be a private, 30 foot wide road that would loop through the project, which could later be connected to a main drive in further developments to the east. He said most of the .. � .. ��x ,. . . ' . J' . •May �7, 1986 Planning Minutes, Page Seven surrounding land is vacant, so that there i: on i.mmediate surroundings. Demographica113 this project would be marketed to f irst-time so there would likely be more children in tY than in apartments. He said that they had � to the possibility of 140 school-age childre The average lot per duplex is 19,000 square development continued on throughout the 118 would eventually 648 units. Mr. Erkilla s would sell in the $50-$70,000 range, and wo parking spaces on a lower level garage. C developed. He said that the project was an generate 810 vehicular trips per day, which apartments and consistent with the traff ic City's southeast area plan. The proposal includes berming along 494, and Meridota Heights Road. He said that it would develop single family homes in this area bec adjacent freeway noise, airport noise impact NSP wires. He said that the developer has t' the City`s preferences for ownership, lower lower density, and smaller buildings. He sa developer was asking for approval on a preli evening, and that the time before final PUD ' could be used to work out any problems with regulations. Chairperson Morson said that without any mod available, it would be difficult to act on t He said that he was apprehensive about build construction, since it is a poor way to atte He also questioned having the 5.5 units per that is designated in the Comprehensive Plan per acre. a small impact , he said that home buyers, Cs development iticipated up eet. I£ the cres, there d that the units d include two enants would be cipated to s similar to the udies of the screening along be impossible to use of the and the overhead ken into account ise buildings, d that the inary basis this ould be approved ircraft noise 1 ordinance is proposal. ng frame uate noise impacts. cre on the land for four units Commissioner Duggan asked what considerationlwas given to lower income families and the impact on value to homes nearby. He indicated that he would not be comfortable with 150 units at the $50-$70,000 range, as it could affect the image of the community. I Mr. William King, 2365 Delaware, asked just what the zoning was on the property, since he had heard several different densities. Chairperson Morson explained theldesignations in the City's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinances. Mr. King noted that the Condor Corporation proposal is then within the allowable densities envisioned in'the southeast area comprehensive plan amendment. City Administrator Frazell also noted that it was possible, under the PUD process, to blend densities between two different zones. Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, said that the City had no ordinances in place at the present time which would allow this rezoning as requested. Mr. Erkilla responded that they May 27, 1986 Planning Minutes Ayes: Nays: Ayes: Nays: Page Eight are following in the footsteps of the Guidelines already adopted, and that they were merely seeking preliminary approval at this time. Ch�irperson Morson responded that the City had no category of zoning in which approval could be given, even on a preliminary basis. Mr. Thompson said that as far as they were concerned, the noise abatement issue is the only one left. Planner Dahlgren responded that the noise issue is a very important issue, because it has implications for the type of use allowable. For example, he said that the Metropolitan Council's Aircraft Noise Guidelines take a dim view of individual entran ces, uses, and promoting outdoor activities, which this development would. Mr. Friel quoted minutes of the City Council meeti.ng of January 7, 1986, in which Councilmember Carl Cummins indicated that Jim Riley's failure to receive multi-family housing bonds was a result of his own inaction. Commissioner McMonigal moved to close the public hearing at 10:52 o'clock P.M. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. 6 0 Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend denial of the application on the basis that the City has no ordinances in place which would accommodate the request. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. 6 0 CASE 86-12, BRODD, Mr. Joel Brodd was present and indicated he has a vendee's LOT SPLIT interest in the three lots before the Commission. He indic- ated that they would like to reconstitute these into two buildable lots, and that parcel A would be sold to Joe and Linda Phillips. He added that both lots would be in excess of the City's minimum requirements in an R-1 zone. Mr. Brodd also requested a variance to allow the screen house on Lot A to remain. Commissioner Burke moved to recommend approval of the subdivisior. as requested, waiving the public hearing requirement, and � approval of a variance for the screen house, on the condition that the non-conforming metal shed on Lot B be moved sometime during 1986. � Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 YMay �7, 1986 Planning Minutes CASE 86-13, FRILLMAN, VARI CE Y Ayes 6 Nays 0 TH 1 9 TASK FORCE APPO NTMENT VISI�N STATEMENT ADJ� Ayes� Nay s ; � 1 Page Nine Mr. Louis Frillman was present to discuss hi's case and presented a letter from his adjoining proper�y owner to the east approvi.ng the variance. The Commission noted that the only reason the variance is required is because of the slight curve in Eiergreen Knoll. Commissioner McMonigal moved to recommend approval of the variance as requested. I Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. Because of his residence in the general vicinity to be affected, the Commission unanimously endorse� the appointment of Commissioner Ultan Duggan to the TH 149 Task Force. The Commission reviewed and discussed the City Vision Statement as prepared by the drafting commit�ee. The Committee members were complimented for their good work, ; and the Statement was considered acceptable as written. There being no further business to come befole the Commission, , Commissioner Burke moved that the meeting beladjourned. Chairperson Morson seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:25 o'clock P.M. � D:1TE : , May 27 , 1986 3 � T0: `fa�•or, City Council and Cit; � rator rR0`!: Paul R. Berg Code Enforce,men� Of i icer SU3JECT: 3uilding Activity Report for hldy, 1986 CURRENT �tONT}i � . YEAR TO DATE -•��$( YEAR TO DATE - 19� ' N0. VALUATION FEE COLI.ECTED N0. Vr\LUATION FEE COLLECTED N0. VALUATION �EE CQ!L=CT� 3LDG °�;.`(ITS � — • s=D 13 1,526,885.56 10,403.01 29 3,527,97II.25 23,529.61 20 2,391,417.18 '15,858.99 rpT Q � 0 � � 0 � � � c/I 4 2,613,000.00 11,868.79 8 3,027,500.00 14,083.35 15 4,370,495.00 19,740.55. 1 uzsc. 23 107,116.06 1,673.20 62 397,671.96 5,759.05 30 219,888.74 2,971.55 ' su3 ToT�T 40 4,247,001.62 23,945.00 99 6,953,150.21 43,372.01 65 6,981,800.92 38,571.09 , TF�E ?ER`tIT5 . ?lbb 12 303.00 37 852.00 28 703.00 � �'=r 8 40.00 27 115.00 21 12,602.50 ' S'�� 4 70.00 18 280.00 17 297.50 { � �:C� � nC , ' c�s F'ipe 11 . _543.00 49 2,578.50 29 1,61G.0� � sU3 TOT�[.35 956.00 131 3,825.50 95 15,219.00 � � LIC��SI�:G ' Concractor's � � Licenses 33 825.00 226 5,650.00 180� 4,500.00 TOT;L 108 $4,247,001.62 $25,726.00 456 �6,953,150.21 $52,847.51 I340 $6,981,800.92 �58,290.09 � �OTE: :�11 fee amounCs exclude Sae, Wae and State Surcharge. Amounts shoc.� will reflect only permit, plan checr �.�� v a-1-u a t-i o n--a r�ou n t s. . LIST �F 1986 TO BE APPROVED BY CITY_ GOUNCIL pN JUNE 3, 1986 As ha tic/Cancrete Pavin License Bitum nous Roadways, Inc. Excav tin License Eagan Excavating Company Turne Excavaiing Campany Mason License H. St ckness and Sons Cement Constructian Imper'a1 Canstructian Concr te Concepts, Inc. Krumw'ede Constructian Bette man ar�d Sons Construction Gas Pi in l.icense Twin ity Furnace Campany Gene al Contractor's License Keys one Builders Corporation Dund e Nursery Dako a Fire Suppression, Inc. Vall Pools, Inc. Quality Design, Inc. KMH rectors, Inc. Prat Nomes, Inc. B.T. . Construction Unibilt, Inc. Deck Plus Copp r Ridge Homes, Inc. Neat n and Air Conditionin 1,icense Twin City Furnace Campany Fenc Installation License Caun ryside Fence Sign�Installatian License Scad Tracy Signs, Inc. ` Roofing License L and P1 Roofing North Face Exteriors Inc. CITY OF MEND4TA HEIGHTS May 28, 1986 T0: Ma or, City Council and City Ad '�t�tp� FROM: ames E. Danielson ublic Works Director Street Vacation - Clement Street e Mr. and Mrs. Steven Garlsan wha own a hame an Lat I, BZock 5, T.T. Smith's Subdivision Na. 4 have discovered that their lot is approximatel feet n rower than shown on the glat. Their hame does not have a garage theq would like to construct one now, Their house is set back �he minia 10 fee from the east property line�so the only location left ta constrt garage ould be along the west property line adjacent ta Cleinen� Street, There 's not enough room along Clement ta construct a garage unless Clen would e vacated., Clement is unbuilt right=of-way that goes through a wetlan s. The land located west of Clement is all we�lands and is awned Sommer et I9. It is designated for open space within their PUI), therefoz can no be canstructed upon. A11 the remaining undeveloped property aIc Clemen on the east side could be developed aff cul-de-sacs stubbed in f Vandal Street. 15 and t a by it T ere are some existing utilities lacated in the Clement right-of-way along ith a trail. Therefore, if Clement is vacated, easements would need to be e�ained to pratect �hese faci3ities. AII �he abutting progerty � owners have signed a reque�t ta have Clement vaca�ed (see attached). T ere is a$250 feet for vacating stree�s and as of this date no has p 'd tha� fee. M��7►� S bject to the City receiving Ghe $250 application fee and the app�o- priate u�ility and trail easements signed, s�aff recammends granting th� . reques ed vacation. ACTION iREOUIRID: the s duct the required public hearing and if Council wishes �o imple f recommendation they should pass a motion adopting Resalution OLiiTION APPROVING VACATION OF CLEMENT STREET RIGKT-OF-WAY LOCA'I 3RD AVENUE AND WENTWORTH AVENUE. ent 6— 1 . . � :`�.:'� � .: ...'i.. .i ,1 ., ' rS , �� irr.;r � �� ..�:f7/7.r�I✓!% � ,at . / _-•— ` , - — � j /� r � f� `r � v T ��• Y7 � �i Y "/ / �.�.---`,%i ..�T.•—f '._ ' � .r�jGr f <; � t � ��-- �l` .h! /Tr'!l/�7 1 /1�' ✓4�'J � or/ / t,� p 7t G. � i� _ _ .. _.-.. -J ' ' . "�"' � � ��, _� �: ;. �=`. .L�,. _ � � .- _._. r_ C. ,' i i �.�.� +��c,�t�c�G� • �� ,� � � � �� n� �- • � � �:, ` � � c, .. `.` 1 C� ~ , i ` `1.... , ._ A �2V. ..�.__�.._. � ``i'� 11 ^••'�T % ' s � :: {� t-�'� �r�i._ � r�4 - � } a ; ,�'. _ � � � � ' ' { z � � '' � � - �. , _ r ' S �: � .: , t '' ' I � � t � i ~ ' " �i 4.03 i r1S � t�� .�1 a �; .i,s " r .• :_`'-�--:rt'_`'; , „ a s ' •� • „y :� � � ; on ' i , ��/i��" `�V�-r�� f,r, 9 !a N i!L r.� !a'- tS i�� iS �4 �tI `� ' � ,., ; � tJJ.Sb = to> •: ;o: ^ �os � � 4, . 9t/. S,� O Z ti .k? � „•. , • yov,r.e � •t n' ' .�•• I .ao '.. •. - ;� REAR�NGFMENT�,� pF M ti ' .t _ l :`� � C� l � 3 7 6 s .t 3 Z � t L , 4� • � � et�CK 9 T:T. SM1TH�� , � ' IIr 1 i � � Yt^��. { .. * y � . 1�.. i�'.7 _ ' i . SUS V�S10N N0. 3 � } ,.� ,J /G h .,� `,3 ,L � . � � h M y �o i< <z �S �7 d►�'f^ • �� .•fr, 'h�r:r�` �� . .. .. .. .. .. La ._.._'tn � r<7�✓f' o"'.i JLt.'t:. ~ � � . � � a� i.�i��F3'. Go .. .. �o -�,.; Si JT 4• 4� ,� /J� 0�� 4 � , 7 a�.� "'� � �.5 ��h !�, � ; �f" ''_ 3 S t � r L 3 -,c "Y �� "�. � j~� �•n :; :l + S � � � . — _ �r:i C l: 1 � � 1 .� .��,,.? �r �' } � j C, Y. �i �' ,� �} .��, it t rr �0 9 r � T c s' .. 13•'4---1 �(� }�_,.' � 1.�� ___ ?!:�' `t�' .) . v ...��`7 �� 'i y�f i :j ys.�3lh °f �' �� .�� ; � _ y \�_� �,�,.��, � .� f`'J rr 6.a zi"E. �dti '7C i -_ .. �„ i f '� C �{�, Yi n• , •-� l ��.; � r "Z � ,' " � � ' r� � ; _ `i � : � 'r ( j :n G � ,�.{F 1! � t Z I ' �' i i..—:___.�- � t � n.�'a'cS`7,.,,E. s9_ 1 f t `I � ; �;. , � � 4.. j ` ' - H.rtiy`V 2,1 E..tj_ , i�1 � vi !..__�=�_1'� '-},� �y � �a n � a �aca � � � � _ s h� L� � `; � � ; �r, �� .ri : . ( � .'+ ' � � i ° � `�' 4 � ��i+'�! `4� f r �H. Ct'fe'21"L y � � �. .I � �� I80.4J co S7 S� GG L: t�n �` %.. :!� <. � , � � �- �= f.. t` , • �i...53 r!?� l32 • ��' ,�. _te .. • ' co�;ao:.� i��ur�� c,. .��J , ' / ..� � �'� ��TrrJ �t�. � , � `� i � '�, �-_ _,�.. � _ ° "� I 4,.� j ,, ; ,� , y f �� . :�� : �-G' '_ �' � _ _ � �R� i/ � � ,,;�a�,�. O\'` , �^� C) J '` --'�--�-`-• — 7c'�?, ''i _%? -r_� / +' �3Z � j ._r � /? �.r,,, --�1 --------_.__�--. .� _ - ---� _._._, . �- � `' � ` �� j ; �` �h��iG��r i�l11JF.i!;ht��•'�-��----- =.___:_ T , r , ^�� r �� , �� F '�� iSv� rJ st , y r L� tt�" u� y .� I• -^-a "�' i. �� 7 c_ 1 G E i T';' � '�,� �'� pLt r'� � {"y ''�` .J 1 ! � �. t i ' �i�\� � � ��1� Y i'. .� � ` { 4'si S . ;i I �.°-� �7L�. �I L � � � .--;� --�-��, � � i'' i i –,-, _ ___'.�..,.' ` �U,� ��/ ` � � ' ,� r ` E3U{�DtNC: _l.V=�f f � �� i L,ljL� /i��,�,%'LI cC t�:-t{ t> >''�;� ,% ;I' f 1( � ! � k { � � �� -� � �� `'` �:I �f.� � • i I •� � ( �,� i � , � t � .� � �_ i�.�.�_.._.____��_;,,r =.�. —�.��'—,-�.1? �— - - ----- _ . ---- - - ----�— - - - ��--,....', i � .. / ....� y r.. r f � '-O .v� �: �� ( .-.�... ,� � '�:�Li�"S._ ,_ -{�.�.a��ei ! , i � �i � R t. � . R � ti1 � : ��.: :.J:�_ � a ,... . i ....,., f!? � t'\fl:...y?l. . � `� � e � I -. � City af Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- RE�OLUTTON APPR4VING VACATION QF CLFMENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED BETWEEN 3R�? AVENUE AND WENTWORTH AVENUE WHE AS, Somerset 19, LeRoy and Beverly Noack, Glen and Elizabeth Mulcahy, Ste hen and Debra Carlson, Rager Yackel, and Steve A. and Jayne Draves are the current record owners of the praperty contiguous to Clement Street fram 3rd Avenue sauth Co Wentworth Avenue in Mendota Heights, Dakota Counjy, Mzn esota; and • � af wi EAS, a petition has been duly presented �o the Gi�y Council of �he City endata Heights by the above stated owners for the vacation of a 60 foot street particularly described as follows: � That part of the following described parcel: A b0 foot strip of Iand lying immediatel.y adjacent to and weste�ly af the following described line: Beginning at the northwest corner af Lot l, Block 5, T.T. Smith's Subdivision Na. 4, Dakota County, � Minnesa�a, thence southeast a3ong a bearing follawing the West � ine of said Lot 1 as distance of 1275 feet more or less, to the north�line of Wentwar�h Avenue (County Road 8) and there terminating. WH EAS, a notice of hearing on said vacation has been duly published and pos ed more than two weeks before the date scheduled far the hearing an said vac tion, aII. in accordance with the applicable Minneso�a Statutes;�and WHE�EAS, a public hearing was held on said vacatian on June 3, 1986; at 7:45 a'c ock P.M., at the City Hall oi the City of Mendota Heights; and � WH EAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear a11 persons interested in sa'd vacation and all persons were afforded an opportunity to prese�t their vi ws and objections to the gran�ing of said petition. N0� THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RES4LVED by the City Council af the Caty of Me da�a Heights, Minnesata, as fallowsz � l. That the vacation of the street described above, situated in the Ci�y of Mendota Heights, is in the best interest of the public and the City, and i� not detrimen�al to the health, safety and welfare of �he community. 2. That �he above dascribed stree� be and �he same is hereby ivaca�.ed 3. That the City C�erk be and is hereby authorized and direc�ed to pregare and present to the proper Dakota County afficials a no�tice of completion af these vacation proceedings, all in accordance with the applicable Minneso�.a Statutes. 0 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 3rd day of June, 1986. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk � � 1 �� Mendot 750 So Mendot Attent Re: C I}ear M April 3Q, 19$6 � Heights City Hall ith P1aza Drive � Heights, MN 5511$ .on: Kevin Frazell Avenue . Frazell: We as nter�sted property owners in �he area request to have the street known as Clement Avenue, located in Mendota Heights, vacated fran W ntworth Averiue to 3rd Avenue. Please � inform us of our next procedure. • � N � Y1� 19 CC)ND(�'I.�tIUM ASSOCTATION, INC. I L-,�'`7` , 1 f ^ � �, �j�? ' � � t� � I � � �� " � �. .�.�. ��% � �' �_. ,,.. r .� , J� fi}�, �4"� -`4; K—ti+v �L iLi �� ! �.f '....�r�-L' � �'�L" C. i/� .'S I • �V�� ` � ' ' . , • '� /.-' � , , ' " � . � ^ S � ��y / } / . . '�t!...>,- . �. ____.... _. ��., r- - _ • �f j , � .� ' I � r=- �!� 1 is; �"f 1 .��'/'`� � �T .�� C� �I � � �.�- /�'V�. �'�,-Y.:�' a-`�r��,,��-�.�� - ?/�) � r'' /�`�' ',U"iU" v�"'G�r �� `/ /�`"� \� !�V �C r (e � � �C..L�X�� ` � � —' � Jl..�t Ar� /f�2r Lc � t_:_ , . � .r.,_ r� � -'� ' °��"� CL-�' " '� � , .�j�/9 c...�,.-t-G"�2�'' �'% ,�G� —�r/� ,,�-. ,,�/ � ,� .�'�='t r.', l `" . %/ �r��/'��✓"�)i�.?,��ti/ i -� � �� l � �� - � � � ;.�, ..� �� ..� � �f� ��e.a �l s� - � � 9�.. ��Z� , �� ! ✓ � <��-�� < ��ln , � �. o�� .�� .��-- ��L�c. t�c cC. .v','�.�t�%t�� C% � ��-c t��l' --�'��liL��J�3L% �� `�✓GV � ! �- =� ��-� 1��.�,_ ��-.�,,�� , �� 'v41(�C' ��.�`�� C% '%'%1-0�.-�>�� ., �� - . � �� r ,� /- �� °��-. ��`, �f �%b%_!�'J'l �'� /i�%I��c�'��:�'� v --- -- � 6�� "'�'� x � �%,�~� .�,�1j,Jti,.,�, .v" / �:/�. , f/L�/�. ! �' � � ;.� � , � �j �� , � - - � �� _ v��(��,�� U �`� � ��--- � 7�Zt--� ..�%'(.`� r� � � �� .� �c��.� � l��' `-'. � . . , �. `,� �%' 1 /� �� " v2 (� � � ��= � � �� - 3 ,� �'�u �,. � � --� 3-�� ,'� � �� -- ��-� (' � G� 3 _ � •�-c-v/ c�� (� �j� ��- CQ.U� (� 90 ��..�i� �-u�z, � 7� � �-c'� G�P� �, 7 d �'�'� �' C'-C''�.� ' � �� . . �-� �� .' C��—. �o � � � � �'� � �, �S �.,E.�r'�,t,�2 � � cj S � h� C�-a �. :, � � `� � �� -�. � � � -� �t,c� G�L� . 5 �� PaUe 2 4�� s inte ested property qurners in the arera reoueut to h:�ve the street kno?,rn as Clement r"�.venue, loc.�. eci ii� i�ienaa�a hei;hts, va.c��ted fr m t+lent orth to 3rd � G��l �Y�.� I G ,�� C � �. �.�� , � � � ��, � ��1 � ✓ ,� �� r� �� ... / �S�'� � ��-�-�� 1/ �� l� ,•7 �,r„� �,�� /� {� � v C'.,,Q�"�''i�`��,�=�C�,,.� V/ "'w — %� `f � ' ��✓�i NJ JI-�jS� 1�f ' " ` ��21� « �%, 'Ir�t.K.' � �--�/� � � �� ' � r. .� r ��G� ��'�-�- �--_. _ ,� // �� .�.�t.f-�c� G t� _ � �./' � �� L^ � ✓ � � Ly. ��7��`�� L.-�"" � ��i ,r'1?�..�2�cr � -�..- �f�;� �� 1�--� - � "�� r <�t,z U. � � �J ' /�> � : t'' ---�-r' '--�� `�-� ; �� ,�y,�,,��ss (!" / � �-c".,v-yz `, � `� C-z� t j . � / ^"YLo yy�(.L / �-- J ; ^ � + ' � dV � ♦, j � '/ �l �S,'� `i ( ��/ � �f ,{. 4 i v,i,�.,r�;(,,�;,'J `==��{,. C.t i. �., t �: � � r:�� u ; %"! : �.� 1. �' ,. .'' ' �' r:.�f �'`",`(` C-�...i.�.. u ,, '' ,j �- M � i, :: `.r.� -.� i r` �.,,� I} �'� � 1�-�l ��,� /�� /�� 0 TO : � st Ev Do Ev tw co gr Ph su an CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS '1.�' � May 29, 1986 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator 1: Klayton Eckles Civil Engineer Sewers, Water, Streets Evergreen Knoll Phase II Job No. 8618 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 6 ION: The following constitutes a feasibility report for the proposed con- ction of sanitary sewers, storm sewers, watermains, and streetslto serve green Knoll 2nd Addition, a proposed subdivision to be located west of Road, between Wentworth Avenue anii Bachelor Avenue. The original green Knoll project (Improvement No. 83, Project 4) was broken down into phases. Phase I has since been completed, and the utility construction emplated under Phase II is now proposed to be completed for the Ever- n Knoll Second Addition. The attached drawings show both Phase I and e II utility plans. On the preliminary plat the west portion of the ivision is platted into 13 new lots about 17,000 square feet in,area, the east portion of the subdivision is platted as an outlot. The outlot have the potential to be replatted into 4 or 5 lots in the f uture. Although the outlot does not need utilities until it is replat is proposed that the project serve the outlot and the Kladis proper wi 1 allow the watermain to be looped and the street connection to be made. Also the construction costs of one larger project are gen lo er than for two smaller projects. Specific costs`and considerat ea h of the proposed utilities are given below. Approximately 1350 f eet of 8 inch sanitary sewer pipe will be to serve all 13 platted lots, the entire outlot, and all of Kladis' ty The sewer will be extended from the existing sewer stub that w in talled as part of Evergreen Knoll lst Addition (see sheet 2). T of sanitary sewer including overhead, fees and contingencies is app ma ely $67,020. Approximately 1550 feet of 6 inch watermain will be construct wa ermain will connect the existing stub from Evergreen Knoll lst to the existing watermain along Dodd Road (see sheet 2). the cost co structing the watermain and services, including overhead, fees ti gencies, is estimated to be $73,250. The storm sewer utilities necessary to serve the subdivision ti co sist of about 850 feet of concrete pipe, with a connection to th Ad ition storm sewer. The total estimated cost of the storm sewer, cl ding overhead, fees and contingencies is $31,400. ed, it y. This odd Road rally ons for nstalled proper- cost . The iition con- The streets will be 30 feet wide bituminous�with concrete curb and � ' gutter. Evergreen Knoll street will be extended to Dodd Road along the , Kladis property so 30 f eet of his property will be acquired. The total estimated cost of constructing the streets as shown on Drawing 1 will be $80,850. � - In addition to the costs of construction there are some costs which were incurred during Phase I construction that were deferred for Phase II. The cost of extra depth required for sanitary sewer in order to serve the 2nd Addition was deferred, and this amounted to $5,000. Also some of the costs for installing watermain in Phase I were deferred to Phase II. These costs amounted to $5,500. Finally, some street costs were deferred, amount- ing to $32,150. The total deferred against Phase II that should now be assessed is $42,650. The following is a summary of the construction and the deferred costs. Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Streets Sub-total Deferred Costs now realized TOTAL COSTS ASSESSED ASSESSNIENTS : $ 67;020 73,250 31,400 80,850 $252,520 42,650 $295,170 It is proposed that 100 percent of the construction costs and previous- ly deferred costs be assessed. One of the 14 lots in the subdivision has been previously assessed so only 13 lots will be assessed as part of this project. The Kladis property will benefit from this project because it could be developed into 4 lots in the future so it will be assessed. Also the Outlot set aside for future development will be assessed as part of this project because it will be served by all utilities in this project. Below is a summary of the assessments. Description Evergreen Knolls 2nd Add. Outlot (Future Development) Kladis Property TOTAL Amount Assessed $ 180,570 69,450 45,200 $ 295,170 AveraQe Lot Assessment $13,890 (13 lots) 13,890 (5 lots) or 17,360 (4 lots) 12,850 (4 lots) � ' The average lot assessment of $13,890 isabout $1000 less then the lot • � , as essments f or Evergreen Knolls lst Addition, so the costs of this1project are qu te reasonable. I � E On the basis of the request for public utilities to serve the proposed Ev rgreen Knolls 2nd Addition and surrounding areas, it is possibleland feasible to do so using the method shown in the attached preliminary design irawings, and st ff recommends the construction of the project. AC ION REQUIRED: I Subject to the signing of a Petition for Sanitary, �torm Sewer+, Water and St eet Improvements and Waiver of Hearing by the developer and Mr. and Mrs. K1 dis it will not be necessary to hold a public hearing. Therefore if the Co ncil concurs with the staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion ' ad pting Resolution No. 86- , RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, 0 ERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SE RS, WATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE EVERGREEDI KNOLLS 2ND AD ITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0. 6) � � Eve City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVF�ME AND PRII'ARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWEF aATER, STORM SEWERS AND STREET CONSTRUCTION TO SERVE EVERGREEN Kn 2ND ADDITION AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT N0. 86, PROJECT N0� 6) tEAS, the Cityi Engineer has submitted his report to the City Council with �ect to the proposed construction of the following improvements io serve �green Knolls 2nd Addition and adjacent areas, to-wit: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets arid ease- ments in the area hereinafter more particularly described. I The construction of an extension to the City's water distribut�on system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acqui- sition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary oflstreets and easements in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto and the acquistion of easements, in and f or�the area hereinafter more particularly described. The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the grading, stabilization, drainage and bitumi- nous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curbs and gutters on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. � WHE EAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement a 1d con- str ction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported in the pro osed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and WHE EAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated wit in the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and is more par icularly described as follows: � NOW Me n� Lots 1 through 7, Block 1, Lots 2 through 7, Block 2, and Outlo"t B of Evergreen Knolls 2nd Addition. and Auditor's Subdivision No. 3, Part of Lot 41 lying East of line at right angle to North line 513 feet West of Northeast corner and Nortli of line parallel and 183 feet South of North line. � �THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cityl of ota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby rece�ved. 2. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that _ _ the City of Mendo�a Heights canstruct the abave described improvements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. � ' " 3. That the City Engineer be and he i� hereby au�horized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said impravement. 4. That said improvement shall hereafter be known and designated a� Improvement No. 86, Pro ject No. 6. Adapted by the City Couricil af Che City af Mendota Heights this 3rd day of June, 1986. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lockwaod, Mayar ATTEST : KathZeen M. Swanson City Clerk u " CITY QF MENDOTA HEIGATS May 29, 1986 T0: ayar and Gity Counci2 FR4M; Kevin D. Fraze , C� 'A�Hm3.nistrator ��'�� • StTBJE T: Preservation. o£ Darsow Farm ay Laudon will be present Tuesday evening to discuss her pragres histo ic designation and, developi:ng a plan far preservation.af the Dar Appar ntly, she has not been able to meet with representatives of the F�a.sto �,cal Society because oi the nead for more documentation. She is with he County Historic.al Saciety to accomplish that research. ouncil asked that City Planner Howard Dahlgren and City Attorney prepa e memos of their�thoughts on the issues involved in the proposed Those memos are nat avaiZable at �he writing of this memo, but wi11 be to Co ncil when received. �M ' . r s in saw Farm. State �working Tom iiart preservation. forwarded 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � May 29, 1986' TO Mayor, City Council and City Ad '�a'tor ,.��Sn� FR M: James E. Danielson Public Works Director SU JECT: Brodd Lot Division Case No. 86-12 DI CUSSION• The Planning Commission at their May meeting considered an app� by Mr. Joel Brodd to reconfigure three existing single family lots � lo s. There were two items of concern discussed at the meeting andi we e: ication nto two they 1.1 An existing screen house on the newly created lot will now be an ac essory structure without a principle structure on the new vacant� lot . Th people who will be buying and developing this lot were also at;the me ting and they stated that they would like to retain the screen house. Th y propose to relocate it and use with their new home. I 2.' An existing metal utility shed will will be too close to the lot li e. Mr. Brodd stated that he intends to remove the shed. i RE OMMENDATION• The Planning Commission recommends waiving the public hearing gr nting the requested lot division. They conditioned the approva Br dd removing the metal shed within the year 1986. AC ION REQUIRED: If Council wishes to implement the Planning Commission's reco th y should pass a motion adoptin Resolution No. 86- , RESOLUTI IN THE LOT DIVISION OF LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, SOMERSET VIEW. on Mr. ndation APPROV- , � 0 City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT DIVISION OF LOTS 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 3, SOMERSET VIEW WHEREAS, Joel W. Brodd future owner of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 3, Somerset View, Dakota County, Minnesota, has requested from the City to divide those lots into two (2) lots; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said lot division and finds the same to be in order. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, that the lot division submitted at this meeting be and the same is hereby approved. ATTFST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Robert G. Lock�aood, Mayor � Case No. U I� r��- CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application � Fee Paid � Applic nt � I Nam : Brodd Mr. & Mrs. Joel W. Last First Initial I � Add ess: $06 Linwood Avenue St. Paul Minnesota Number & Street ' City State Tel phone Number• 22�-4341 (home) 224-5884 (work) Owner , � Nam : P�'sons, Jr. Mr. & Mrs. Bertram W. Last First Initial � Add ess: 7 Beebe Avenue � • Mendota Heights Minnesot Number & Street City State Street Location of Property in Question: 7 Avenue ' Legal escription of Property: Lots , 4, 5, Block�3, Somerset View, Dakota County, Minnesota. _ � �` I .. ` � Type o Request: . ' . Rezoning ... . ' Variance • .. Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. � *�finor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval - ' Plan Approval . Wetlands Permit • Other t desires lot s lit a roval to divide this rcel into tF�o ne lots tin of all of Lot 5 and�40 feet of the mbst westwardl �oortion If Lot 4 , and all of.Lot 3 and the re,mainder of Lot 4 as a second parcell .. �:-�.. , 55105 Z ip 55118 Z ip 0 Applicable City Ordinance Number �jp � Section �� Present Zoning af Property:_�� Present Use of Property: Residential ProPosed Zaning of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Residenti�.1 Number of peop].e inCended ta live or work on premises: � I hereby decl.are that all sCatements made in this request and on the additiona2 material are true. Received by (title} NOTE: The follawing plans shall be drawn and attached �a this application: A. Applications involving a Variance shall submit the fallowing plans: , Date Reeeived Initial l. Site Development Plan 2, Dimens3.on Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Grading Plan _ . � B. App].ications involving a Rezoning, Conditional tTse Permit or Subdivision shall submit the f o3:lowing : 3.. Sketch Plan 2. Abstractors Certificate , {If the subdivisian involves cutting of existing parcel into Cwo or more l�ts}. C, Applications involving a Wetlands Permit sha11 submit the following. 1. A full & adequate descripCion of all,phases of the operaCion &/or propased physical changes. , ..._ 2. A topographa.c map of 'the area. Cantour interval.s shall be drawn ar two {2} � faot intervals at a horizantal. scale of 1" = 1,000' or larger. 3. A detailed site plan of Che proposal showing praposed drainage, grading & landscap 4. A site design map showing the location of existi.ng and fuCure man-made features within the site and to a distance o£ five hundred (500) feet surrounding the site. � LAN! , ATE: REPORT . , � ASE NUMBER: PPLICANT: OCATION: � , /�CTION YRE�UESTED: ~ 4 � 4 G CONSIDERATIONS: 27 May 1986 8612 Mr. and Mrs. Joel . Brodd Between Ashley Lane and Beebe Avenue (See Sketch) _ ._�_ . _.- --- Approval of Subdivisi on The property in question consists of three lots (Lots 3, 4, and S) which the applicant propbses to divide into two lots. The northwesterly parcel (Parcel A) would have 130 feet � of frontage on Ashley and 130 feet of frontage on Beebe. The southeasterly lot (Parcel B) would have 118 feet of frontage.on Ashley Lane and 137 feet of frontage on Beebe Avenue. The depths of the lots are approximately 190 feet. The parcels, thus, have a land area of over 24,000 square feet I and over 26,000 square feet. Thus, it would appear that the proposed division exceeds the development standard applicable in the R-1 Oistrict to which this land is zoned. There is an existing structure on the southeasterly most lot. You will note that all of the lots to the northwest and southeast have frontage on both streets and are each occupied by a single-family home. The intent here is to develop an additional single-family home on the northwesterly most parcel. � The attached survey • indicates a metal utility shed less than one foot from the proposed common property line. This shed is allo ed as an accessory structure if it is less than 144 square feet. It may�be within 5 feet of the property line. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to question the applicant as to whether or not this shed can be moved io conform to the S foot setback requirement. Other than the above question, it would appear that the proposed division meets or exceeds all development standards and is appropriate for approval. � � :' , ; � v' ` . • � / i.- _n�' i •� - '� �"� :�� , / �.-.0 .o �` _. , . � , o • - • , . . . ' " . •� ir ( `�y ;�� '. `(,, /�� .._� . . �� r ' ��.yor+ . ,.�......_._..�_. . '��i , ' • .' ' ._ . aEifti �_ ,� _ . '�� "' '� " .{. �. `J;' i. / .� .:/ +. � _"_� {... .11 - ^ `� V ! / 4- `., i 1� '. .�f � I F- - t ._ . f ``^� :�' �i� ', , •• � �,�' / /y?.i ` .'!+. ` t ;%, 1 " �,�Y'/� �%�•- .»_`a `! f-.. .iCi � � / • f !� yn � /�Rl �\4' if,'/!'�' �/)�<� "/� . - �>�/ ' .'�7 �' . /� �� s�''�` ��(��'.`'JS.SFiL-,♦ . •{!! s ! � � : � ' ; _ ,' ..• � • : . - .+ � ` ''�� « -=.7 . \ �_ ,) _ � � � � � � �n • ``` � J f f . `�,: /' ,; ,/,� (v ' i = ' - , .. . � T ' 'C"y. . '_�7 4'__�_�.i._..f ', �. ,`�:/�n� _.i�..� l' � �! r ___"'� �C`^ �� J.� t .'4�;.� � i �r='='==>:i�' 4 ,, µJ��i .+�. ; � .. '�v1, / ' •" f"`• . . ~ / . � , .. z ,S�kE{t ' •�`.� � . � • . !% 1 i � ,`�' .�•� ''�/ . "r�r.._ . t:�.. � . ---_ � r,^��i : � <, %- ., =—��:. , ,_ _ v,_;_�_mt.:__..� ._ ��,�j,1 f :'�i�. t ��"�"'_ / f�� % � ' ^ )„� �,:�: �� . —... -_ _ � / .., s ' ` . � �j� j �- � %�---� ,r Jv, _- %�" '_ � � •� �' , i .� , r--�4, ' / , � ^' _ 7'�� _ . - !L� —• �\• � t � +' -T- • 4 �: ".JL'� ' <'.. 'r" �'�,,.'/'' "'i�y �� : �� ! p`. ' / .'` `•'4•�,• � Ua• � 7 +'• �'•�.�'p �L. %;- .s'-- �.i r .__•-., � f i%'-r r• f!' !tf"a:G�, ..___ -•� � �j . ,�.�• , ». . ' •'•�+i• � �•i •'�'�'� �I i ' �� i: "i. ;�t i _� ��-+'. ti � ' �/' . , ` s : . ��h �:��.......':J}-� k , i r � )-\\ t._ ;:i ; � •�>J',r� " i , f� `ff'_ . ��% ",,; ,�.9' � .. " •� - . \ 'E • �-��.�.'.`• '� : ;- `'1 ; - .� � � . .i'�,� .i�! '� ,'^ � Y't! % w� �4 i'.�l/'►±a /,•'� . � . ,J. � i _ �.. � J . , �. . �„_ „1!'. Y „� k , . � r� , �-' ' " u: : .: �. � '�- � � �I�-:'' + ./''r ' L t r , .' -`=�`. ' ,� , r . ' i.i ". : - ° , • • • • �` J � i % '� �� '�' � � � ; ,�,� •,-�� ,. �Y�.=�� „j `�'j�.�+.�'• •• . ' � y � -� ��?�C,,� r�: % ' ' % ': !: .�., ;',JrF ;( , - `' y:,•'� �:f'�j.� � � �� { {✓ f ' __ _ . tt . ~1.'• '� i' /�•` '� }.-.1 �• ��: _ ;�� •.�,= ��:� -.;f� �� :� ��;.�' � SU�3JECT PRUPERTY � �''�� .,f �y�� = � '— ==�—_-r'— - h � `.� � ' - �,t,� ��. 1.�,,'.. • � r"`7 ''�j'_' �+°.___'� __'_- - �`.��> �,�'S' ;i 6'. ,�• � .�7\.r/1i..Gt i„�� .��'� �t•,� ��i\ t�'�� .. ��'. . �'�` tY,'',� , � ''�; � NORTN i ^ � � Fc � ` � � �� %• . � : �. '__._ -__-_ r-...-'_-'_- ♦ �.'% :'l: � �� . . � -+ % 'e ,." � � t S C ''?�- . ;.{ � < PaRK �, V .� `�� '"' � ' �� - � I •'"j�� "f�, -�Y� . ., j � �� ,1 • :� � i'' '�� ' '�.', �� -� a • � ---�,.- �„ -,��'��r � a� � , '�; �•� ::r:- , � t- •: � � �,' z . � ��. 7 � I '�' � � •' ', .`�l w .� i� �'� av r _��: . � / � . c°� ' � _ ' ��+ . ...•_... . . T : �... cu �� . • • �. >+' �� -�-- -7�^ -� � �.� �/` ' .;�-_��}!'� . •+`' � J � � I, `^�''fi ;�r, ' "TT"'_ L�t4�� _ _ _ - - �. � �: y-�- " .1 A� � � �'� ��-.� _.- I:�- �'�� -y1�� [ .r J � � , _l �-�i, , i•� • 'y "�• � • • �_� • _ •T.._ " '/� '_ /� i w�� i f ' '.� � ' �, �,� � � \ r' o . i ' � ' � rv. �. • �; " •y' "' ; `'c' �� , .� +qrt � . �_..__..�_.. _ . '�• �g . •/•,' � �_ . •• r : . , y � • . 9u�t � , "s�.. _ _ _ . w ,t _.� , 4 } . � c. }j N ++f . , � : r.. +_ � -. � . ( + �tr � 1 ' • � ' ' 1 ' L-..: /\,� _ .� ( � , ; '� _ � i ( / • «--z-- �' � : }€ ,� � • �'^'�, .iF � +_ -1--- � -�'- -��- �- • -: / _ ! r , � j � J • ;ti : f . ' ' .�, ��'' •�',.: � � � y -:,,�ti ; � /, • , , ' � v; . .� C '� . ^�'.sa.c;sti+cct.�i • L.�.I I,, f � � J � } ' : 1� IJ � � „� • ' t • ��.� .>,,.��, �� - - �.� � � ...t � � // � ,_. � �..�,c ,j• ��. � . . . . • .• i.�, � .� }'r Z r l�� /�' � � s • • : � . . _ _� L... , . .J �l'-__• �r • - �MER:iOi�L,. nvr�iic ' .•• (� � �,a �,//� t = , , . .;p � : : j � 5...... � � � i a �� r � EF�. � �__ � ' ` ' YAC. » `' I�l�i1 � • � � •• ' t M ' � � -'� ��• y�... l . H � � � � r ( i• ,: : ► ! . =�; `,6.,�---- ! ?. o, �e � • • ,• » ..,: :�a � �. t� _ • ` ` ' 11 � ,, , � �� llll.:! � !! I ' � I • _L_ �/ �`J-%'^^.v-' � 1 f�(. uini� � • i�,,�4 � F - -� � ��; {t' � • ' - -_ _ --•' / �► - I � � .._.. � }�� ,'� SO�•tERSLT � . _ • , ' . j , +f ; �� ` ' T � _, _' �j GCUNTRY LCU$ � . � , r. ^ 'i� x �/� , � € •�• �`• �/'' ,Z� ..�,'_.... •,ri � _ }, � .I. ,�, ft• A �,` � • Y i� •'�'� :,f� � .�I ..�� ` . , H .3'�� i:G.i:. - �I, � � i-' � ( � i 1 .--� t : • 1 i ( t , � -• � ` t_.! � ,J ` ' �"' i :A.ytii..' (� � G� T _�j' <'�'-�� Y" 1 WfNTWOHTH � ! r, U ��__ /i (( � PARK L „ � � '�` ; � . ! . i . 8 �t � � �`•, i , � �', ; . . , . . . - (--��-= �_ '=:d3.Z'k il'L�-'_.�.'� `_ ._d. -�„_ --.: -�: -: • :_. . i � r�/.. . • '' • � � i �= 1 I � V � '_;"_j_____-� f ; + > � I , • , � � 'f =' t�• �•� �`: ( " f--�_ _� -- � - - _------ -___._._._..f_._ . • -•__- ; � r . : � 1�: .� . . - . � , , f y� i � _.._,..� J , ��. ` t_i ; �; ( � - - ---• ------ _--. _ - �'� • �="' • ' ' 1 � {i', . _' ': _ t i-_., . , _ . i � i. '' �` '� � . - / � • : _ __ � , _ .. __ . _ . :; . ,..� . � � � TO• : FRO: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMQ Mayor, City Council and City Administrator K: James E. Danielson Public Works Director JECT: Frillman Variance ON: May 28, 1986� � The Planning Commission at their May meeting considered a side �ard and set ack variance to Lot 13, Block 2, Evergreen Knolls. Commissionmember Dor thy McMonigal stated that she had been granted an identical variance whe her house was constructed. REC MNIENDAT ION : The Planning Commission unanimously recommends to the City Council that the requested 6.75 foot side yard setback variance be granted. � � ACT ON REQUIRED• � If Council desires to implement the Planning Commi.ssion recommendation the should pass a motion approving a 6.75 foot side yard setback variance to ot 13, Block 2, Evergreen Knoll lst Addition. i f i f ; CITY OF ME[�iDOTA HEIGIiTS ,F DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST jt . Applicant (� • � � � •. � � . , Name: �Y� �_ � � ��Il � ' �L��S . ' , —TLast First ; � Addr ss: � � � ��_-ovt.�� !J�-,� , ,� Number & Street , City Tele hone Number: � S r% '�� , � ' Owner . • . Name • � Last First Addr ss: � Number & Street City Street ocation of Property in Question: � �� ' r Legal D scription of Property: , � : ��. « . � ,��- a z�� . : . . . CLiS@ NO. Date of Appl'cat Fee Paid �d �J 6 � Initial .. � S tate Initial State � . - . . . ,� - . , - . .. Type�of Request: Rezoning ; Variance ' Conditional Use Permit { Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. `, • rlinor Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval ' Plan Approval Wetlands Permit ; ' " � Other ` `' � � � • � i � 5��-� . �.�1 �7 �� :- , „ h CITY OF MENDOTA HEICHTS MEMO T0: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson ^ and , Public Works Director , - SUBJECT: Case No. $6-13, Frillma.n, Variance l May 21, 1986 Paul R. Berg Code Enforcement Officer DISCUSSION - ' Mr. Louis•Frillman has submitted the appropriate.drawings and letter, along : with a variance application. He owns Lot 13, B1 2, Evergreen Knoll Addition,� (1636 Pamela Lane) and proposes to construct a new home on the site. Upon . completion of his certificate of survey, Mr. Frillman discovered that the south- east corner of his home encroaches 6.5' and the southeast corner of his garage , encroaches 4.2' on the required 30 foot setback. Because the house to the north at 1632 Pamela Lane is set back approximately 70 feet from the front lot line, Mr. Frillman's house is required to be set back . a minimum of 50 feet. Staff sees no problem with the variance as requested, however, Mr. Frillman should present a statement of=approval for his variance request from the property owner to the east. ACTION REQUIRED Review the variance request with the applicant and make a recommendation to � the City Council. JED/PRB:madlr � h 9 Geo� Rober� P. � Louis w. i John N. C^ii Sigu�d M. . Kuy ECarris � �Stewart N6 Ha�ry L. J� Mark N! k n � ��► , !r. i � �, MAI " R,obert Boblet� Associates, Inc. 400 Minnesota Feclerat BuiJding s.t.tr. Minneapol�s, Minnesota SS4Q2-1703 Phone 612 333-6515 Easy Link Mail Box N62859905 Industricr(/Cornmercia! Rea! Estate May 19 , 1986 Mr, Jim Danielson Mr Paul Berg Ci y of Mendota Heights 7 South Plaza R�ad dota Heiqhts, Mi.nnesota 55120 � IN .RE: R�quested Variance � 1636 Pamela Lane ; Iat 13, B1ack 2, Evergreen ICnolls Ac3dn. Mendata Hei.ghts, Mi.nnesota r i9essrs. L�nielson and Berg: Wallace O. Kotsrud, CPM, S.l.R Alun P. Leirness, h1A1 Narry Mi!lc�r, S.l.R. Johrr F: N tsort, Jr. Janies X. �en(hold, S./.R. Donald E. il�aodwarcl, S.l,R. Robert P. I3ob1e�L S. t. R. you knaw, I am hereby forntally requesting a variance ta be con: Mendota Heights Planning Cammission, and hape�ully subseg >ting this month regarding the above referenced property. �e find a��ached a sit� plan, which shc�ws the layout of our {p Iot, with the set back lines clear].y defined. As yau can : :r of the garage is clipped by t� set b�ck due �o the curve i: i, as it abuts our lot, daes push �.he set ba.ck back commensurat he requested variance therefore is to allow a 6.5 foot enc autheast corner of our building structure and a 4.2' encroachmen orner of the garage. Please note tha�. there is an additional t round area between the lot lirie and the actua3 physical curta in eason far the encroachment is that the hause has een set back ront yard so that we are in lirie with cwr neighb�ors. would apprecia�e th�at consideration be given to my request, in nner as possible. hank �au Eor yaur consa.deration. st gaxds,._- , Lou�i s W. F r i11m-�n cc: Jahn Shaz'dlaa D�htgren, Sharc3law anci Uiaan INDIV11iUAL MEMBE'RSHlPS: Society ojlndustria! Realtors, Amerrcan Society oJ Rea1 Esrate Na�rona! Associutron oj Corporate Reai �state F_'recutives, /nrernationnl Courrci! of Shopping Federation lnternationale Des ProJessions /mmpbiliers, National Assperafion oj Industr'ia! & Of Urban Land Institrete, /nstitute oj Reu! Esta'te Managenrent �red by the City t City Council posed} home on �, the southeast Evergreen Road .v. r�'oachment in the � in the southwest e�t feet af actual t�is location. �e 73 f�et f r- orn the �v as expeditiaus a , ('s�:��! � ::� rv_ ��r .9crta r � � �t . � Existing Houae � j -�� •• yipn�� '�''•'IId��T•? _�� Dullding Permit Sucv�y fot. ! LEGEND io � LOU PAILLlIAN � �O/6 r�2 ° � " '4 . � a Nub vith tack mpa�rc 1 �� 27 Q� w ° • 17�J•7�J 90s.6 • I�on No¢ument Found n '� '-prainage and Ut113Cy Easemeut ,� � � r0 r �--y ^--~�� — �--'� �l�—�—�Y�^^—' `� Praposed 5urfacc Dreln � ._. 39 ,� � � � �a - ��boA- �` 90/./� Exieting Elevatian (� x '+� � �' / ` �rFroposed Elevattan 0 1 x/ 1 � \� � - 20 � 1 ` / ` � � ++ \ . i I � � o � 'tl 906.3 � sss a °r � �+ , f� 2 ..�..__.. _ . c m � ra ti � . -�' � � s�, °. O'-r-30--------1 �„''� P80POS£D H6QSE • +t 'r� �\id�r L �� N � / �` m �'d / l\e`Po y � i 90G. t s.0 °c,F ' �, o9e °3 u ' /� � i ' � � `�� n � ,� / ( 4`� � � !0 . \ F� � SCBie: Z��. � Z�' -'"� ° �C� We[c� sexvica � � ( '� i . \\ '��. t� � � N � ( `"� SeC�a�k \ ` M (0 ,�', � I � � Q¢ _8u�yigeg j a t � ,„,,. � � p w .• � •�^1dnv.=891.1 � 'D » � �° ,z '= j � � _•.--�'' > � v'°i ° -PRPOSED DRIVE-N"" � � � 8 � � � ! . /'� Q m � w a' s � I '-• "^""'- ._. 9055 � /,r, i °' �i fn , � -"--_ =cso -.--_ 2ne� « __ ..qpQ� � ��" � s � o I 904.! %% 6D � �_ i'� . r, $�' :a � (fl }� � � � i ' i � e .,'' . W '^ � 1 � p � �/ a, s ' ¢ �µ ' ` ~ , ,� O1 �•----, ^� "� � �� y ' ■ � �.,� �.,r �-- -�- 10 � �� ' Q: 4 L. � ._.. _. �.�. ..r — --- -" '" '— -- i o a c . I.L � r•Electrical 1ks�sfotmec Bmc r903.! p.2 t a yy 106.93 ~ t ''�¢ �1O -- tJ 66° O7' 50" n� A,ra sos� Hydrant �� Exi�tin Concrete Cutb TO�� Existin 9" uatczmxia ...r- Inv.896.60 : ... � ; � . 4 ... : KNO�� J--•• EXietin 8" Sanitary Seuer ... EVERGRE�N . -- - •• —''�J I hereby tertify tfiat this tn a true and correct zepresentatiaa of ''!` Manhole a survey of eha bouadeiiaa of: � ttio soo.rs �nv 8H7,b� Cot 13, Bkock 2, EYEAGREEN K:tOLLS iST ADDITION� according Firat Ploor eLev. 907.83 to the recorded plat GheXeofy Dekote County, Mlnnesot�. Family Roam alev. 407.ib ead the Locetioa of all vinible eneroachmaats CaraYe Floor elav. 906.50 r if aay, f=om of oa Bas�eent eLev. ggg,�g said tand. Zt aiao shava tha location of • propoaad buildloQ. M Easement elev. 898.12 � ` aurveTed by ae thia 9r,y day of � � 19d6. _.. " ` _ � _ "` , � � 13 ; ---2tiQ uire.s/' � r ! 9/O.B r / �\ �' /M cw^D � ,/ �tQ ' r /' 90A3 � r r Heahole / Top 906,'I2 Irtr. 643.35 llG�.:� ,�.�.��v A v n A. Rehd�r, Land Survayor • Hin¢eeote Ra�i�Crattoa No. 1J295 JOB N0. 604-637 � Ra�hdar-W�nz�rl, fncs. 600K cc'�aca mo avyrres wv sui..arav 70t0�r.ta�.nw�ri5e,,nh • 4..,,..Mun,rw.ww,5H37 • �f1AMF�W f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO � Mayor, City Council and City Adm' str�tq� �M: James E. Danielson Public Works Director �JECT: New Stop Sign Ordinance May 29, 1986 0 'DI CUSSION: ( ' With Copperfield being completed this summer the City will have three ;ne roads that connect to Huber Drive and these road will need stoplsigns. ,Th police have also identified two other locations that need new signs; 'En erprise Drive at Northland Drive needs a stop sign and Pueblo Drive at De orah Lane needs a yield sign. Stop signs and yield signs are established ;by City Ordinance No. 1113 and amendments are done by separate ordiriances �am nding the basic document. There have been several changes over the last fe years so there are several separate amending ordinances. To tidy things 'st ff has redone the basic document including all the stop and yield ,lo ations in one document again. . DL' 11MML'TTTIATT(1TT. a IA , P Staff recommends that the above discussed new stop and yield i to the City's Ordinance No. 1113. JN REQUIRID: If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they a motion adopting Ordinance No. , AN ORDINANCE ESTABLI YIELD INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. s be d STOP ti CITY OF MENDCITA HEZGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N�. ___ AN ORDINANCE AMEhFDING ORDINANCE NO. 1113 � � The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota ordeins as £crllows: SECTION 1. (Jrdinance No. 1113, known and referred to 8s "An Ordinance�Es�.ablishing Stop and Yield Tntersections Within The City of Mendc�ta Heights," is hereby amended in the foll.owing respects: The £o1l.owing streets are hereby �dded to Section 1 0�' said�:. Ordinance, "THRQUGH �TREETS AND STQP INTERSECTIONS," ' Through Streets Huber Drive Hub�r Drive Huber Drive Northland Drive TH 11� Frontage Raad Sto� Stree�s Bent Tree Lane Copper�'ield Drive High Pointe Drive Enterprise Drive Centre Pointe Boulevard The following streets are hereby added to Section 2 of said Ordinance "THROUGH STREETS AND YIELD INTERSECTIONS," Thraugh Streets Yield Streets ----- - ----- --- - ------- Be�orah Lane Fueblo Drive _., ., .. r.� SEGTION 2. Thi� ordinance shall be in full force and effect frorn and a£tex^ it� publicaticrn according to law. Adop�.ed and ordained into an Ordinence this Third day of June, 1986. � AfiTE�T : ----------------------------- Kethleen M. Swanaon City Clerk GZTY OF MfiNDOTA HEIGHTS --____....---------------------------- Robert G. Lockwood Mayor � � � � . � i ; T4: FE20M i SUBJ: h t � the : poli+ � f a � , � � CZTY flF MENDO'�A I�EIGHTS �� May 28, 19$6 Mapor and City Council. Kevin D. a��City Administrator CT: Claritication of Street Lighting Policy ncil Iast considered the issue of street Iighting on J'anuary owing guidelines�and referred �he matter to staff for prepara E . The City, in general, wil7. not light residential area.s. H neighbarhood requests wil1. ba considered on a case-by-case `th, adopted ;ion of a : specific . There will be standards far izghting design in the various use areas (i.e., thoroughfares, business park, e�c.). Atl�ached is a sc�ematic and picture of the type of lights, Sterner Execut3vs, that Un�ted � Properties would like in the�business park. � . Thoroughfare lighting would be paid for from general City tax + MSA sources, as available, Al1 other lighting cosCs, both fo ! installation and on-gaing aperatians and maa.ntenaace,,.would b � � charged against the users, • i Staff is prepared to draft a resolution of `street lighting pol.icy for sider tian. Hawever, in reviewing the memos and minutes of the Januar Counc'Z preferences an two issues was unclear: i - . Are we gaing to light aIl MSA and ather tharoughfare streets ! light level, or merely light areas of poten�ial safe�p hazard x ! . For tharoughfarc� lighting, is the standard NSP pole-mounted 1 ; ab1.e? i � With ouncil answers ta these questians at �he June 3rd meeti.ng, s�aff a pro osed resolution for consideration at a sub�sequent meeting. ��'o direct staff on the above Cwa znquiries. t or uncil con- 7th meeting, a specified � ight acc p - ,� �' � will prepare � i t , _,,,��'R�,;•• y � . D�'',.'' r � � � �� , - _ . , . . _. . , � .. . � • . . ' r: .(,� 6Pli'�VJL�P'C�,.• �r�i�il*"� • �A"�� -'� � � SIT� �.I�ENITIES: SI�NA�E � LIG�T��G . _ . . .. . _ . .. . _ . . . . . : .• . - . . - --_ �.. ..�.....,:...,._.,.�; TO: Ma FROM: Ka Ci a CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO r, City Council, City n' at,.'or � hleen M. Swanson y Clerk SUBJECT:IProposed McGovern INFORMAT�ON At Realty t and wate of the o request recommen arrived applican been pay DISCUSSI . The 7$-60 if formula. aeparate reaoluti May 29, 1986 Resolution on Outside Utility Connection Ch Realty Utility Connection RequeSt he last Council meeting, Council discussed a request connect a Lilydale property to the Mendota Heights s systems. The discussion lesd to questions about the tside connection charge formula. Council action on t as postponed and staff was directed to review the for revisions. Kevin, Jim, Larry and I met last week an t a formula which we believe would fairly treat both s£or outside connections snd Mendota Heights residen ng for the improvement pro�ects. rom McGovern nitary aewer equitability e McGovern ula and �ointly he , s who have attached proposed resolution, which will rescind Resoiution No. adopted, completely reviaea the original connection cherge The proposed formula is generic in nature - it does not require� calculations for multiple dwelling units aa does the exiating The intent of the existing resolution was three-fold: ta "asseasm nta" equivalent to what Mendota Heights reaidenta hav improvem nts; to require cummulative interest similar to the c interest oa., deferred asaesaments; and to charge an overhead co recogniz'ng both that some of the i'inancing for all of the imp availabl ta ad�oining communitiea has come £rom General Oblig and that the City incurs on-going system maintenance, engineer administ ative costa. The resolution is dif£icult to interpre applicat'on of the calculation formulas has often resulted in decision to install private on-site syatema or in attempts to reduced harges. The proposed resolution entails a three-step calculation asseasme t rate charged would be the same as that assessed aga Heights roperties for the improvements to which the outside p would co nect. A 15st overhead £actor would then be applied ag 'assessm nt" and interest (at the rate charged on the original roll) wo ld accummulate annually on the principle amount from easeasme t roll adoption. The reaolution requires that full p harge paid £or lculation of t ovements tion taxea ng and and the ither negotiate ormula. The nst Mendota operties inat the assessment he date of yment of Outside Connections -2- May 29, 1986 connection charges be made a£ter Council approval and prior to connection to the utility systemCs). Staff feels very strongly about this requirem�nt. �inc� propertiea affected by the reaolution are outside o£ the corporate boundaries, the City would have no method o£ callecting delinquent phased payments other than legal action. The existing formula applied against the McGovern Realty property resulted in a connection charge o£ 539,765.65 and did not include an area '•assessment" far trunk sewer. The charge as calculated under the proposed farmula is 528,768.84, including trunk aewer. The charge ia broken down as follows: Sanitary Sewer = �13.00 per foot Watermain = 11.00 per £oot �24.00 per foot X 1.15 =�27.60 X 449 feet =�12,392.40 7i interest for 16 years = Trunk Sewer =$0.015 per squsre foot, 15,000 square feet + 50.01 per square foot, 76,644 squsre feet = 5991.44 Q 1.15� 7i interest for 17 years 13,879.49 1,140.16 1,356.79 528,768.84 The Water Availability Charge is 5200 per unit C�4.800 for the prapased 24 units7: the Sew�r Availability Charge is �475 per unit (�11,4007. Thzae chargea are payeble upon iaauance of water end sewer permits. The availability charges are governed.by ordinances and are not included in the cannection charge £ormula or the above formula application. RECOMMENDATION We recommend adoption of the sttached proposed resolution to establish a reviBed policy for outside utility connections. We £urther recommend that Council approve the McGovern Realty utility connection request conditioned upon payment o£ the connection and availability charges. ACTION REDUIRED If Council concurs in the staff recommendation it should take the £ollowing actions: � 1.� Move adoption of Resolution No. 86-__, "RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 78-60 AND ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS OUTSIDE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES." 2. Move approval of the McGovern Realty utility connection request t '?utaide � : f t ,r, �..,'ri� 7i '� }?} -4<�.M • f n onnections -3- May'29, 1986 conditianed upon payment of tlie 528,768.84 connecti.on charge prior to cannectian to the system and payment ot the required SAC and WAC charges an ar befor� th� issuance of sewer and water permits. I , " 4 ' � f � i t r � i CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minneso�a RESOLUTI�N NO. 86- RESOLUTION RESCINDIN.G RESOLUTION NO. 78-60 AND ESTABL�ISHING CHA�GES FOR UTILITY CONNECTION5 OUTSIDE MUNTCIPAL BOU�NDARIES ,WH REAS, in the past the City o£ Mendota Heights has pro'vided utility service to properties outside af the City's municipal �oundaries and has imp�aed connecti�n cha�gea f�r such servzces based on a�ormula established by Reso utian No. ?8-6Q; and 'WH REAS, it was the intent of said Resalution to provids a means for outside cannectiona to occur at a cost similar to the amortized aa�e�smenta for Men ota Heights praperties which were served by the utility main� a£fecti g the outside connectians; and � � substan and non REAS, the connectian charge formula impases interest chsrges ially exceeding those which would be ievied against Mendota Heights es and requires a surcharge for general obligation caritributions specified governmenta3 casts which exceeds City obligations; and WH REAS, while it was not the intent of the Resolutian, the affect o£ the cost £ormula has been to discourage outside connectiona; � Mendota connecti c � 1 : i i i � ; f F THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o£ the Gity of eights that Resolution Na. ?8-6� is hereby rescinded�and the n charges re-e�tablished as faiZows: 1. That water and sewer connection charges far prop'erties outside of the municipal baundaries be computed �based on the aum of �hree elements in the £ollowing order af computation: a. Front foot assessment ba�ed on the special a'ssessments leuied for the ariginal impravem�nt proaect �n which the utility was installed; b. A surcharge of 15i to partially pay for Gene'rsl Obligatian cantributions and other nan-apecified ' gavernmentsl casts; � c. Tnterest on the principle amount arrived at in steps a. and b. above in the same percentage charged under the ariginal pro�ect assessment roll, '��__ frorn �he date af the original assessment roll adaptian. G � 2, Thst the totsl connection charge comguted in �tep 1 be paysble a£ter approval of the connection by the City Cauncil snd prior to ectual connection; � 3. That the applicant submit an e�crow deposit ta cdver anticipsted City costs for plan review, inspection costs and other engineering services which may be required of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the provisions of Ordinsnce No. 806 and Ordinance No. 807 relative to Water Availability Charges and Water Surcharges and the provisions o£ Ordinance No. 803 and Ordinance No. 805 relative to sewer rental charges and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Sewer Availability Charges shall be applicable to all outside utility connections. Adopted by the City Council of ihe City of Mendota Heights this Third day of June, 1986. CITY COUNCIL ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ------------------------------------- Rabert G. Lockwood Mayor ATTEST: -------------------------------- Kathleen M. Swanson City CZerk a � T0: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor, City Council and City Administrator K: James E. Danielson Public Works Director JECT: Fire Hydrants at IOS May 30, 1986� DIS USSION: � As a result of Paul Kaiser's review of the IOS office building plans, they were required to install two more new fire hydrants near their building. Under th St. Paul Water Utility's rules, fire hydrants can either be public or pri— vately owned but if they are private they either need to be metered or be con tructed following the terms�of a special agreement. Metering the water is difficult because the meters need to be in �a building. IOS therefore proposes to wor with St. Paul Water Utility and has developed the attached agreement. The City followed this same procedure several years ago with Cray Research at their off'ce building. RE MMENDATION: � Staff recommends that the City enter into an agreement with Stl Paul Water Ut'lity and Dallas Development Company that will allow two fire hydrants to be installed by Dallas Development during construction of their IOS office building. �AC ION REQUIRED• If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation they should pass a mo ion authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the attached agreement on beh,alf of the City. � � � . �,. ,- - �� ::i' �Ii� ; � C � } ? �� k , �. tr� i .r' _. i�' Z � � .',� i .' f 10369 West 70th Street • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 •(612) 941-2971 �ay 29, 1986 Mayc�r Robert Lockwood City of Mendota Heights '750 Sauth Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, h� 55120 Re: I.O,S. Clffice Building 1031 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Aeights, MN Dear hiayor Lockwoad: We have agreed to enter into a contract with the Ci.ty of St. Paul's Board of Water Commissians for the purpose of cons�ructing a private water main at our above-described development. Enclosed are six copies of a Water Utility Agreement from the city which require �our signature. in order to be scheduled on the Jun�: agenda, we need to have these documents returned to the City of St. Paul by June 12, 1986. We would appreca.ate your assistance in pracess3.ng the�e agreement� as quickly as possible. Please contact our o�fice if you have any questions regarding the enclosed. SincereZy, ��' �,} t�od} Patricia Waod encl. T CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � . :; �:, �r�� °� �� ;� BOARD OF WATER COMMISSION , rr%" 7 _.,�:, S D. MO REN - CHR7S ATCOSIArQ��`�+ � ,'� � I[&� �� ■ r � � �..�� • r.: i r°� !_ ! 1 L DEBORAI�„_,8,_1�jCHF�GF�l��y�R�SI EN7' T �� 1�� SEN �..�..�, .;� _ �,..�... "�� L"ANG��Is�� ;�, e a ' � � ,��„i�q,"o�'�, ;�;:.;� O H N D � ' � :.r � �'r . ��,-�'"':_'y�?e�r ;�_':'�`- =:.- j a . 'i � ' _•st;". �. =tC'� =. �r, ; "�• ' � 3 7 � � r :� c � �_�. �.�`_�-_^ -��<�,3 'p � , e� `'' .r.- '4�k. � � fi; {y y �� w�-�a.��` .��?-,:�- - � ` �'� -- ,i- ' �• �' �c � �� r.. �' �, � y�':,o, i .•(: SIPP�R_I ER-•.;, �'= _..�+—:,;T�E�.ti=-` �:_r+-� : _ • TREATM PUMPING 4 May 22, 1986 Mr. Marv Vinnes Dallas Development Company 10369 West 70th Sireet Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: I.O.S. Office Building Mendota Heights )ear Mr. Vinnes: -�.. — . -� ;� �� .,a .. , .::- �1� BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ; '''� , � ,.;—; ; � ROGER A. MOHF�OR ' Weter PrQduption Engineer ,.,:::r•�� ;: �..••_.��:u; �r. "x , -!c,. �?��'n' � � ~ �'t•'•�+. , � ;��i'...�. • ?' �i �;`' _ ' :_�c..�.. � ,l .''�'. �?�j �. � I.: •_ • _... DISTRIBU O , . Thi s 1 etter i s sent i n repl y to your 1 etter recei ved on ��lay 1°, 1986 in which you requested permission �o proceed with construction of the proposed private water mai n for the above referenced project � The Water Utility is in a position to permit construction of the roposed private water main and furnish inspection services before the rivate water main agreement is executed. However, the water main will ot be turned on until completion of the final inspection and Qoard of ater Commissioners' approval of the private water main agreernent. ransmitted herewith are four copies of the private waterl main greement. , Please have �he proper officers of Dallas Development Company, � he First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee, and the City of � 4endota Heights sign the agreements, have tne signatures acknowl�edged ' nd return the agreements to the Water Utility for Board of Water o�nissioners' approval. I �� ' - � .Ni�`i �_.1Vi�� i '!' .r �: 1: /. ,S_�y�,:j � �, . • o,, Q SE4a t f The B.oard of 4later Commission'ers meeting agenda must be prepared June 12, 1986 or July 10, 1986 for the June or July meeting. � If you have any further questions, please call Tom Johnson at 4122. I TGJ/jml =nclosures Very truly yours, ��1�.oC � James M. Graupmann Chief, Engineering Division 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 r TH� S INDEP�TURE, Made this AGREtP�IENT day of , 1986 between Dallas Development Company, a Minnesota Partnership consisting N. Sor nson an individual and BDC Service Corporation, a Texas Co� hereina ter designated as "Owners", the City of Mendota Heights, a� �(�lunicip 1 Corporation, her2inafter designated as "Mendota Heights" and �� of 6dat r Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, a Minnesota ( ( , by and !of James �poration � • iinnesota , :Ihe Board luni ci pal Corpora ion, hereinafter designated as "Board"; and 6JH REAS, The Board during all times herein mentioned did and does manage, conl:rol and operate, pursuant to the Home Rule Charter of the City of Saint Paul , i s wa�er wor�cs and public water sup,ply system primarily for the purpose of fur ishing an adequat� supply of water for industrial, commereial and domesti purposes to residents of the City of Saint Paul within its cl rporate limits, and incidentally to residents of the City of Mendota Heightsl�'or the same or similar purposes, pursuant to agreements oy and between the Board and said la t named City and ordinances of said City of Saint Paul and (City of Mendota Heights germane zhereto; and WH� KEAS, The Owners own the fol 1 owi ng �escri bed 1 and si tuated tivi hi n the corporate limi�ts of said City of P�endota Heights in the County of Dakotl, State of Minn sota: I and has' from tr premis Tha�t part of the northwest 1/a of the southwes�t 1/4 of Seciion� 35, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, iNinnesota, lying north of the northerly right of way line of Mendota Heights Road and east of the easterly right of �vay line of Interstate Highway No. 35E I made appl ication to the 3oard for water supply servi ce �to be i fforded � Mendoza Heights public wa�ter supply system to the above described according to the rates and charges payable iherefore by thelOwners, 0 their successors or assigns, to such municipality or the Board as the same may be established from time to time; and WH�REAS, Mendota Heights and the Board have made subsisting agreements, by and between them, germane to the extension of water service for the aforesaid aurpos2s, from said public water supply system of said City of Saint Paul, by the Board, to said City of Mendota Heights and the residen�s of the same within izs ccrporate limits, and such extension of water supply service has been and now is the subject of city ordinances germane thereto duly enacted by the City of Mendota Heights and said City of Saint Paul, this agreement to be deemed subject to said prior subsisting agreements and said ordinances. NO'�J, THEREORE, in censideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties, for themselves, their successors and assigns, do hereby mutua1ly agree as fol 1 o�r�s : � l. The Gwners do hereby convey and grant to Mendota Heights and tne Board a perpetual water main easemenz in, under, through and over and across the following portions of the aforedescribed parcel of land: A perpetual easement 30 feet in width for water main purposes over, under and across the following described tract of land: That part of the Paorthwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 28, P,ange 23, Dakota County, P�linneso�ta, lying north of the northerly rigf��t of way li ne of i�lendota Heights Road and east of the easterly righ�c of way line of Interstate Highway No. 35E. The centerline of said easement described as commencing at point B48 as designated on the Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of ln'ay Plat No. 19-37 as filed in the office of the County Recorder, Dako�a County, Minnesota; thence North 1 de;ree 25 minutes 59 seconds West, assumed bearing, a1ong the easterly line of said Plat No. 19-37 a distance of 80.00 f eet to the actual point of beginning of the centerline �o be described; thence North 89 degrees 30 minutes East 78.00 feet; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes East 30.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes West 30.00 feet; thence Nor�th 89 degrees 30 minutes East 16&.00 fee�t; thence North 46 d�grees 4° minutes East 80.00 feet and there terminating. -2- to co furnis . f�endota Heights and the Board do hereby grant permission to t e Owners �truct, mai ntain and repai r private a�ater mai n necessary for the ing of water service to the following described real property subject to the terhns and conditions contained herein: That part of the north�vest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of �Sectio� 35, Township 28, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying north of the - northerly righ� of way line of Mendota Heights Road and east of the easterly right of way line of Interstate Highway No. 35E, Cou�ty of Dakota, State of ��linnesota. . The Owners shall construct the private water main at their sole cost and exp�ense, in s�rict accordance with approved plans and specificai.ions on file with t e Board, under the supervision and to the approval of the Board and within the easement described in Section 1. All service connectionslfrom the private main shall be constructed by the Owners at their sole cost and expense, in str ct accord with plans and specifications approved and on file �vith the Board u�nder the supervision and approval of the Board. All necessary maintenance, repairs, operation and/or repla�ement of the main and service connections shall be borne by the Owners at their iole ccst � and expense, in strict accord with plans and specifications approved ani on file �vith M ndota Heights and the Board and subject to approval by Mendota Heights and thel Board. r Mendota Heigh�ts and the Board, at the request of the Owners, or in � case o def ault by the Owners in relation to the canstruction, recons!truction, mainte ance, reaair or operation of said arivate main, may enter Ipon said easement area and construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair.or operate said private main f or the aforesaid purposes of the same and all reasonable cost and expense thus incurred by the Board shall be chargeable by the Boa�d to the Owners and shall become due and payable upon presentation of an, invoice 3 I 1 0 therefor; and if such charges are not paid when due, they shall become and constitute a lien upon the real property served. In the event of nonpayment, the Board reserves the right to deny service. 6. The Board agrees �to supply water service to the real property described in Section 2, as the same have been or shall be developed for commercial purposes, subject to and in accordance with applicable rates or charges, rul es and regul ations as they are or shal l be es�tabli shed from time to time by the Board. It is understood and agreed however, that the Board undertakes to supply such water supply only in case the pressure in its mains is sufficient to enable it so to do, and the Board assumes no responsibility for f ailure to supply water resulting from acts or conditions beyond its control. 7. It is agreed �y and between the parties hereto that this agreement shall be subject to water service rates, rules and regu1ations germane to the subject of this agreement now in force and hereinaf�er prescribed and promulgated by the Board or by Mendota Heights and further that there shall be and hereby is reserved to the Board and to P�endota Heights the right to change, revi se, alter, � and amend such rates, rul es and regul ations as thei r discretion snall direcz to the end that such ra+es, rules and regulations shall be reasonable. 8. No extension of the private water main shall be made without the prior written consent of Mendota Heights and the Board. All necessary service connection taps from the private water main shall be installed by the Board upon due appl ication therefor on a form suppl ied by the Board and shall be installed by the Board at �the cost and expense of the party requesting the same. 9. The Board reserves the right to shut off the watzr service when necessary for the exiension, repl acement, repai r or cl eani n� of the private -4- � 0 water ain or apparatus appurtenant thereto, and the Board shall not be held liable or any damage occasioned thereby. 10. This agreement shall be binding upon the Owners, their successors and assgins. The Owners shall not assign their rights and obligations hereunder without first obtaining the writt�n consent of the Board, which cons�nt shall not be unreasonably withheld by the Board. In the event that the Ownels desire to tran f er its title to all or a portion of the premises described in Section Z hereof, it is expressly understood and agreed that the Owners and the transfe ees shall enter into an agreemenz by which the transferees shall agree to pay �al l ar a proporti onate share of the cost of mai ntenance and repl acement of the share � mai nten� be in f shall 5 wiih an 11 Board, i all of priva�te water mai n and furzher agree to assume al l or a propirti onate �f the responsbility and liability arising out of the operation, �nce, use and repair of the main or service pipes. This agreemint shall 'orm as to be subject to recording with the County Recorder, the form � subject to the approval of the Board, and the Board shall be provided executed copy of the agreement. , That ihe Owners, in consideration of its being supplied water by t�e apon the terms and conditions herein outlined, shall comply striltly with the rules and regulations of the Board, and pay or cause �o be paid unto the Boa d therefore according to all applica�le rates and charges presciibed and promulg ted therefore by the Board now in exis�tence or as may be modified or amended which are hereby incorporated herein by ref erence. The Board reserves the ri h�t to shu� off the water supply for nonpayment of appl icabll e water charges and it is expressly agreed tha�t such unpaid water charges Ind costs incurre by the Board pursuant to this agreement shall be and consitiu�e a lien upon th real estate served pursuant to this agreement. I -5- a 12. The Owners, their successors and assigns, shall fully indemnify, defend and save harmless, Mendota Heights and the Board, its officers, agents, employees and servants from all suits, actions, or claims which shall arise from any injuries or damage caused by any break or leak in any service pipe, private main, other main or connection authorized by this agreement except those arising from �he negl i gence of Mendo�ta Heights or the 8oard that may occur from the furnishing of a supply of water by the Board to the Owners, their tenants, successors and assigns or other persons, firms or corporations served and to be served by this private water main; and further, that the Owners, their successors and assigns, sha11 save harmless, indemnify and defend Mendota Neights and the Board against any claim, action or lawsuit brought against P�endota Heights or the Board, except those arising from negligence of Mendota Heights or �he Board, in cennection with or as a result of the furnishing of such supoly of water, by Nlendota Heights or �he Board, to the Owners, or otner persons, firms or corporations served on said premises by such private water main or service connections. � m CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS _ MEMO � T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kevin D. Fraz ,�it� Administrator SUBJ CT: Adoption of City Vision Statement May 29, 1986 � ttached is a copy of the City Vision Statement, as prepared by the drafting team. The Planning Commission reviewed the document at its meeting of May 27th, s most compl unentary of the statement, and gave its apprvval without changes. he statement is then before Council to be considered for final adoption. Counc'1 should a�so consider to what uses it would like to put the statement, and how i should be distributed. � KDF:m attac: � adopt the statement and decide on uses and distribution. r t � CITY VZSZON STATEMENT Mendota Heights is a high quality, family orienCed residential community, with the feel of the country and the amenities ot a city. While it is centraily Iocated in the metropolitan area, the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers form a naCural grean beit around it, allowing the cammunity to maintain a quiet, private way of life, unique in the Twzn Cities. The comutunity has preserved an aburidance af parks and open spaces, encourages spacious residentzal develapment, and has planned for diversified, high-technalogy of�ice and business areas. Excellent schools and a we11-educated populace complement �he tradi�ional but progressive character o� the City. Civic pride and aesChetic excellence are high priorities in Mendota Heights: The mission of the Mendota Heights City government is to prese�ve and enhance the quality af life xn the community and to glan, direct, and implement orderly growth. Thzs is achieved by encauraging and �ostering: - Cammunity iflentity, citizen par�icipation and open access to govern�ent decision making. - High quality, cosC effective public service. - Conservative financial management and low tax rates. - Develogment and maintenance af p�rks, trails, and apen spaces, - High standards of diversified housing stock with cantinued emphasis on single family homes. - Further development oF well-designed commercial and office prajects. The Mayor and Gity Council, as the elected representatives of the people, supported by recammendatians from the Parks and Planning Commissions: are respansible far esCablishing the policies nec�ssary ta car�y out this mission. The sta�f of the CiCy implement the palicies es�ablished by Che Cauncil and pravide direct services to Che community, making �he vision a r.eality. ' ';"-�/2/�6 CLAIMS LIST AMOUtJT 25. 0 25. 0 = � 5. 0 5. ', 0 R.� 1�1. 0 151. 0 *� 15. 0 15. 0 *.� 17F3. 0 'l78. 0 4� 15. 0 16. - 0 */ 1 � 463.. 5 i.463. 5 *� 808.� 0 806�00 *� 1,905.�0 1�905.00 k/ 5.14 19.75 Z5. g9 k� 1�395.00 1,395.00 k� 5.30 23.�5 0 9•20 171.85 39.4 95.8 3.2 2,8 352.2 *i 34,675.J 6,500.� 41�175.0 +�� 3.3 6.7 3+0 13.7 */ �HEC�C R J �N001 G4RTtKE CONST a./c�J l. 1 V-HUlll lll � � 15-Engr � ZO-Police E� 30-Fire 4 0-CEO ITr M �ESCRIPTION R=0 1/2 t�cPOSTT htE:ALfH EDJ S1lC INC MTC 4MM T�E �AWN 3ARti_R WAT=�►JO�KS SiQ 3US TD'J� 5121 MTG APR 51lC N4TL FIRE 'Rt�T ASSiV R�NENAL AMERI-OATa SYSTEM COMPUTE� EQ DODD TEChNICAL CORP COM'UTE� S1! THIRO PLAV=T i�MLSL MDNIiORS P� �EX P�C�EX SYST=M RESDUR�c RtSO �OPIE4 SPLY _ Ra�D ;.OPIER SPLY R&D COPIER SPLY RE�D CUPIER SPLY R&D COPIE�2 SPLY R&D CC�PIER SPLY R&0 COPIER SPLY R�0 COPIER SPLY CITY W ST PAUL CITY N ST PqUL .AT&T AT&T ATB,T 6.T� AT & T I(dr0 SYSTENS PHOTDS PHOT05 � COM?UTER E� COPItR �APER COPI�R�PAPER COPIER PAPER COPIER PAPER C�PI�R ?APER C�PIER PAPER COPIER PAPER C�OPIER �APER 1986 DISP 1986 DISP LD CALLS LD �ALLS LD CALLS MAY SfIC p� ��. naa�riage 60-Utilities 7A-Parks 80-P1�3nning 90-Animal Control ACCOUNT N0. I? �i5-4283-£329-0', OS-4402-105-1' O1-4490-110-1: 01-4400-110-1� 01-4335-315-31 01-4402-030-31 iZ-46Q0-000-0( 01-4301-110-1f '12-4600-000-D{ Q1-4305-030-3( 02-4305-030-3( 12-4b40-000-0( Q1-4300-030-3{ �1-4300-040�-4C 01-43Q0-080-8t 01-4300-110-1C 01-43�]5-020-2C 05-4300-105-1� 10-4 ��J 0-00 0-0 ( 15-4300-060-bG 01-4275-020-20 01-4275-030-30 01-4210-020-20 01-4210-030-30 01-4210-110-10 01-4210-050-50 Q'10UNT 6.74 6,74 20.21 *, 80.0$ 40.73 120.q1 �/ 1,601.00 305.00 1,654.�0 ��170.00 */ �N�Cr( REGIST'cR VEtiDO�� IT�`1 JESCRIPTiOPd AT & T I�t=� SYSTEMS MAY SVC AT � T INFQ SYSTEMS MAY SVC Ei0 WATER CUN�iISS IGN i3D WATER ��?MMISSION �JCf2 �U�P.. DCR �0?P. DCR CO�P. 120.00 O=NNIS DEL�tONT 1ZD.DO *� 175.00 ��AZ=LL 1C�VIiV i�s.00_ �� , 249.65 GJPHtR ATt�LETIC 24�.55 �i 19.95 I C M A _ _ ,...19 .�3 5 * i' . •- - 106.92 __.__. __._ ICMA RC 71.11 ICMA RC 176.03 *� . , 5�0,0 _, INTE� CITY PA'ER 18.b0 INTER CITY PA?ER 7.20 TNTE� CITY PA?ER 135.4 0 IN7E3 C ITY PA��=R 5.55- INTE� CITY PAP�R 31.10 IIVTER CITY PA?�R 75.45 INTER C ITY PAPER 2.50 INTE� CITY PA'_R 2.25 INTE� CITY PA?�R 271.95 *� APR S�IC A.�R ;NG� JUN R=NT JUN R�Nf JUN R=NT J�JN ALL��d JUN ALL0�1 C.APS IMP� TECN 5123 ?A1fROLL �/23 �AYROLL�.'_ _._... COPI�R P.APER. . . COPI�R PAPER COPIER PAPER COPI=R ?APER DISCDUVT COPI�R �APER COPIER PAPER COPI�'R ?APER COPI�R 'APER 0 f ' ' ACCOUNT N0. IVV. �J1-4210-070--� 3 15-4210-060• 3 O 1— 4425-3I5-30 85-4231—$29-00 2 01-4230-500-10 �J1-4200—b00-2� 0�-42�0-600-15 a1-4415-021-20 oi—Q�zs—Yio—io 01-4435-200-7G 6 01-44�2-020-2Q 01-2072-000-0�7 01-4134-110-10 01-4 300-03D-30 5 01-4300-040-40 5 01-4300-080-80 5 01-4300-110-10 5 �J1-4300-110-'! 0 5 01-4305-020-20 5 D�-4300-105-15 S 10-�300-000-00 5 15-4300-06G- 5 056..`i0 bSb.SC * � 10.00 1.47 2.31 3.'�4 33.18 SQ.20 *� 323.59 323.69 *,� 14$.�JO 148.OQ r� 12032� 32Q.30 b4.35 396.57 � 1,Z73.75 20.�4 110.75 20..50 525..1 0 80.00 20.50 2,052.14 �N�CK r�EGIST�R vEtipOi KAIS�R PAJ� Kt�UTH TOM KNUTH TOM KNUTH TOM KhUTH TOM KMUTH 70N� KDKESH SU?�LI=S LFLS LMCIT HP �?LAfJ LMCIf NP ?LAN LMCIT HP PLAN L06IS L06I5 LOGIS LOGIS _ LDGIS , L06IS� LO�TS ITEM O�SCRIPTION MAY SUC JUN ALLD� MI TH�U 5/2'� h1I T;iRU 5127 MI T-iRU 5/2 % MI TNRU 5/27 SPLYS JUN DU�3 .. . JUN ?R� !1 JUN 'REM JUN PREM A?R SU;. APR SUC APR SVC APR SVC _.. .� _ _._.,� .._ _ A P R S V C �APR SVC APR SUC 411.15 MEDCENTERS HP � 1, 034.55 �1EDC:.NTERS NP 473.�0 MEDCENTERS HP 165.00� MEDC_NTERS HP 764.70 MEDCENTERS HP 63.30 MEDC=NTERS HP 729.f35 MEDC�NTERS HP 558.30 M�DC=NTERS HP 139.85 M�OCENTER� HP 4�340.10 .i I`833.33-� a METR3 NAST= CONTROL JUN �PREM � � JUN PREN JLfN PREM JUN� PREM JUN PREM JUN PREM .lUN PREM .fUN PRtM _ . .JUN PREM ACCOUNT N0. It�V. 01-4268-150-30 �lS- 4 415-10 5-15 OS-4 47.5-105-15 80-4415-831-OQ �5-4305-829-00 85-4415-829-CO 01-4435-200-70 E 01-20?5-000-00 01-20i4-ODO-OD+C J1-4131-Q20-20 C , �1-4131-021-20 C 01-4214-110-10 C 0�-4214-000-00 0 OS-4214-105-15 C t�J-4214-000-00 0 15-4214-060-60 G 1b-4214-ODO-00 0 Z1-4214-000-00 C 01-2074-000-00 1 01-4131-020-20 1 Oi-4131-021-20 1 01-4131-040-40 1 Q1-4131-050-50 1 01-4131-070-70 2 01-4131-110-1fl 1 �5-4131-105-15 1 15-4131-050-60 1 _.Y-V-JUN `INSTALL t 14-3575-000-OC 1 4MOU1T 1b,y29.00 37�670.11 2 , 033. 33- �1,68'.45 t � 84..�0 84.�0 * l. 56.�1 80,59 113,40 239.50 _„ 197.95 , 101�.00 12.�3 800.88 */ �HtCK RcGISTtR dE�100? M�TRO WAST= C(�NTROL METRO WAST= CDNTROL MiTR� 4tAST= CUVTROL MILL�P. DAViS CO IT�M J�SCRIPTlON APR/MAY SAC JUN INSTALL JUN IVSTALL MIN.iT= 3�DK5 MINfV B�NE=IT ASSN JUN PREM MINN H�NEFIT 4SSN JUN ?r�M MINN H�NEFIT 4SSN JUN PRtH MINN 8`_�NEFIT ASSN JUN r'REM MINN 8c.t�FFiT ASSN JUN PREM MINN B�NEFIT ASSfd JUN ?REF1 MINN E3FNEFIT ASSN JUN PREM - - -�� 121�50„�.� .M._Y'MINN FIRE IN� 121.50 *, ._ 13..60 _ 3 . 't 0 3.�0 3.40 5.10 1.70 1.70 .� Y32.3 0 kl 37.3'1 _.._._._..__.37 ._3 0, ........ 9.08 116.42 _._ -- _ 37 .31 237.42 *r 3�800.00 512.00 _ 564.00 90.00 _, 1 � 5 7.6 ._0, 0 ._ 488.00 768»00 j/ . -. ACCOUNT N0. ] 15-4448-� '-t 15-4449- -i 17-35�5-OOU-( Ol-43J0-110-7 01-2Q74-000-( 01-4131-020-� O 1- 4131-021-� �1-4131-070-i 01-4131-1I0-] 0�-4131-105-� 15-4131-Ob0-E ..____._....._ . ... _ _._.^ �_..,.. _._..._ .__._. __.. __.z_.. _ . .._._...,. _.�_�_.._..._.__. _ . BAD��S 01-4305-030 - htiNy MUTUAL LIFE JJN PREM �1INN MUTUAL LTF� �itJN Pt�cP1 MINN MUTUAL LI�E JUN �RtM MI�N MUTUAL LI�t JUN PREF4 -- . .. ... ... .._._ . _...._._.____.._ ._. ._.._.__. . ._... .._ _..__.�- --•- MINN t1UTUAL LI�E JUN PR�'M MINN MUTUAL LIFE JUfU PREN MINN MUTUAL LIr=E JUN PREM NORT�u�ST��N 9ELL NORTHWESTERN BELL_,_ _ _ NORTHW`STERN BELL iVORTHWcSTtr2N BELL NORTHWESTc�N B�LL ,. ,,,,, PE"AT-MA RNI �K-MI TCH=L PEA T- MA R WI � K-M I T CH� L P=A T- MA R41I � K-MI TCHEL PEAT-FiAR1JICK-MI TCHEL P�AT-MA RWI �K-NiI T;.HEL PEAT-MA RWICK-MI TCHEL PEAT-MARUICK-MITCHcL _ _ 0_1�2,0T4�-Q00-i. 01-4'1 31-QZ 0-� 01-4131-021-� 01-4131-070-7 02-4Z31-110-1 OS-413'1-105-i 15-4131-050-E MAY SVC 01-4210-050-5 MAY SUC Q1-4210-070-7 MAY SUC�------. .~µ ��._y�..V� 01-4210-070-i MAY SUC 01-4210-315-� MAY SUC 15-4210-060-E P4RTIAL AUDIT FEc. 01-4220-130-1 PARTI,A,L._A,U,DI,.T, FEE ,,__..� 03.-4220-130-0 PARTIAL AUOIT FtE 05-4220-130-1 PARTIAL AUDIT FE� 10-4220-1 -C PARTIAL AUDIT FE` 14-4220-� �0 PARiIAL AUDIT FEc i ~ 15-4220-130-b P4RTIAL AUDIT FEE 16-4220-130-0 x ,� �L 4y0UNT 96. 0 8, 000. 0 *i 13.09 23.37 37.n� *� 4C.'?0 �t0.00 *� �HECK REGIST_R JtHDU� ITEF1 ��SCRIPfION P�AT-MARWICK-MITCHEL P4RTIAL AUDIT FE�� SFT �FFIC= PR�DUCTS S�LYS Si�T �FFIC:_ PRO�JUCTS SPLYS S�LAND�R �JANE C JJN ALLOW 1�098.25 Si-iAUSHNESSY L� JR MAY SVC 73.9 SNAUGHNESSY L E�JR MAY �SUC 95.0 SHAU6HNES5Y L E JR MAY SUC �86.7 SHAUSHUESSY L E JR MAY SUC 195.3 SHAUGHNES51' L� JR MAY SVC 234.9 Sra�UGNNES:,Y L E JR MAY SUC � 155.7 SNAUSHNESSY L E JR MAY SUC 2 , b 4 0 . D * / ._._ _. . __. . ... _ _ __._ _._. .......... . �_..._ ._.. , _.._ __ ._..... ..__.... _. .. I 6.9 SiVYDER DRJG _ST�RES BATT=RT= S 6.9 k, 12.5 SUN VE4�SPA'ERS H�6 NOT nREAP4 12.9 SUN NEWSPA?ERS HR6 NOT ftILEY 25.5 tr 586.5 TRAIL DODGE INC W RPRS 84 OOD6E 130.7 TRAIL OODG� INC RPRS 84 DODGE ,.w---� 717 . 4 . "./ .. .. .._._ .. _. .. ..�..._.,....._..__.�.... _. ..�. ._ .._.... _.... .... _._ . ..� �...�588.3 , 71.� 31 . 5 - 193.20 821�9 *� b8. � A. 34. 23.� UNIFURMS UNLi��IITED UNIFDRFIS U�LIMITEO UfJIFOR`iS UNLIMITEO UNIFDRMS UVLIMITEO+ UVITEO CENT TRUSTEE UNIT�D CENT TRUSTEE UNITED CENT TRUSTEE i�1ISC ?IOTRASCKE T JAC�C=T 9RIDGER CREDI T MISC 3LACK�ELLNER J U N P R E y ^..^. .�� . ,. JUN PREM� JUN PREM ACCOUNT N0. IN 21-4220-130-00 01-43J0-0'?0-^c0 OL-4300-110-16 01-4415-200-70 01-4220-132-10 03-4220-132-00 05-4220-132-Z5 14-4220-932-00 15-4220-132-50 10-4220-132-00 21-4220-132-0� 01-4490-020-2L I 01-4240-080-80 01-4240-OBO-8� 01-4330-a40-20 01-4330-440-20 oi-a'ai�o=o20�-20 O1-a410-020-20 01-4411�-020-20 01-4410-020-20 _ 01-2071-000-00 01-4132-020-2D 01-4132-050-50 � �IOUN T 23. "l8 11.32 161.30 �: y`?.00 99. �0 *r 131.20 131 . 2 0 *,i �N�CK RE;�IST�R VEEjO�� UNITED CE�VT TRUSTE� UNIT�O CE�lT TRUSTEE UNIT�D WAY-ST r'AUL WEST=R� LI=E INS C� ITEM DESCRIPT.YON JUN PR�M JUN PREM JUN �ONTR JUN Pr�EM ACCOUNT N0. IIVV. 01-4132-070- ] 15-41 32-060• ] J1-20?Q-000-OD 01-4132-030-30 : 60,657.�4 FUNO O1 T07AL GEPdE2AL FUNU bOb.49 _,�.. .�___,__ FUVU 03 TOTAL _ �6dA,TE�__,R,=UENU= FUNJ _ _ ,� �3,383.02 FU�I�J 0� TDTAL EN6R =NTLRPRISE 122�.2 0 FU�ID 10 TOTAL SF'E�I AL PARK FUND 4�763.D5 FU!VD 12 TOTAL E�UI't�ENT CLRTIFICA7ES _ 1�529.37 FUND 14 TOTAL CONSOLIDATED DEBT SERVIC 55,021.56 FUND 15 TOTA�_ SE12�R UTiLITY 1�082.35 FUND 16 TOTAL TID I79-7/81-4/82-2/82-E , ...._.__.._.__.._�....Y._. .. ......._�._._.__..__.,. _.._. _ _ . . - _ - - . _. .�..__..._._..__...----.,._.�. ..._...._.._......_..__.__._.�_.... ___......_.-.--.-.- 2+083.33- FUNO 17 TOTAL UTIL RES�RUc 272.25 FUND 21 TOTAL IND'JSTRIAL OEVELflPMENT 2.31 _ ___, ._,__„_, �FU.VD _8_0 TOTA,L _. ___ ,___ __I85-6.L_E„MAY . LA_KE__.__,__ _ 102..15 FUVD 85 iOTAL I85-4�0?PERFIEID TANOEM I 26 �,459 • 76_ ._ . __.__. _. T OTA_L_. _ . ..�._,...,.. _.. _ ._ .. . .... ._ . ._., .,. . .. MANUAL CHECKS 1�1086 25.50 ~ Minn Green Exp E6 Regr.^^ y 11087 370.74 NSP 6/2/ Due Date 11088 51.92 „ DOER,.SS_ Div_. Medicar.e._5/23 P_.R...�.___........._....... .-..__._ ._. ..,___. 11089��~2,939.23 " ~' S/23 FICA 11090 5,418.73 DC Ba�k 5/23 FIT __ 11091 __� 575.00__._... _"_... .. _ _ _ _ 5/23 _P.__R..�.Deductions --- ..- - • -- .- -- •---- 11092 2,599.31 SCCU " 11093 25,169.16 City M.H. Payroll Acct 5/23 Net Payroll 11094 _,,,,,,,,,,,,,15_0_.,0.0._._.,Mn.,_Dept_ Health___._.._ _... _ _ . . Plan_xeuiew...f ee...___..-.--...--- .�..... ..--_ .. _._ ...__.__......_._.._. ... .. . ............37,299.59 .�.... ,• G.T. 163,759.35 1t?`6t9 •' : _: W cri 4 kW I....8 1:IS ; trzz • co7-71 CJ7 0 egos co U1 (J1 co 0 frp 0 NI.D'Wa3 :VM m( 'a) 0 aTo 3p mz *ID W p mz t MH 60'2e.1110 0 N 0 o O a rmn 0 m m a m NO:IlOf HISNOD h4. LAKE LE MAY PHASE I SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN Ex STORM SEWER EXTENSIONS NORTH FROM ENTERPRISE DRIVE nhCITY OF NIENDOTA HEIGHTS 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota o> Tei 0 0 Z 0 0 MOHS 01 o3SIA H z 0 1 NN z o r o rnoom c�DZ-z-1 • M (.n CO .c m o-4 zo w -4 71 C -O - * Hr3m 2: m Ow 0 c-1 Zm — X rKDzm Dam oc D-0 -Irz_1D= "',1 Z D D 0 Z OrrNMnm M m Z m 3>an0� c H r m m o� O� Dm mr om z 0 m D m r m 0 M 3/11,24 a 3Slddel N 11 (3,i 1�dS o, • • 0 i ,01 ,o1 SI ,51 rnCo_ = Co_ x < (7) �0 - z�m -1 H 0c° /\ 1N3W3sv3 OS X09'9 A'9„8 __----681115- o ,3' ..sitt• \ IN)c0 4-1 IN - .?(.2) g,ere � O a" ,,ea _71/S .9N/AOW W -9 V \\ 01 CO o z -1 —1 CU 0 x ,p L 3JN %Y/ JN//l /80 _17O.9 LAKE LE MAY co M co w 01108 39b1NObd -- 3dO103_ sss H1 9NI1SIX3 SS Hl ON1109H lON 38111f13 SS Hl Orsinoe 1f10S 3af iru 11 I LOOuwti9Ob0a3 9b1N0ad 3af)1nd M0a M3N 3NI1 Aleadoad 1N31N3SV3,01r. F f M0aO90 0 0 w in 'yin U .. P- N • (i) c O co OO z 0 O _IL -(5- z 0 3 U w UJcc v) Tr3 0 Q 0 t11osauum `s1gStaH tnopuaN OA1.IQ EZEld q[anoS OSLlivir SIH9IJH VIOGNJJ1I 10 A1I3 3Al2J4 3SI2JO2J31N3 INO8d H12JON SNOISNILX3 2J3M3S I/1801S '9 `NIVWN31VM 42J3MES A JdlINVS I 3SVHd AVW 31 3>IV1 M 0 M Sheet No. W 7 0 cr 0 M CO CO 6Z m O I l - •,a-.s%,,rh. g, 7S • - QQI_LPc anti 1-J 10,: 'aM'+daveiZ 7#'�a��f*�'� d J - '71 WINO iia—Alt _ _ :_._ -is .'''. N 11 it IN I111IL'JIUId■ NE """"' --- �.. m mu o - -- 2.0175 111111111111111 ■UM Mama MOM t+o�c7...x, .z, ..O•.1'. 91. QZw1�s (^t,1—CV Va--12-1-.1-' 1 y 1 • • • i, Igimmo0 CirrIER ■rr--rrr 1 lit ' !i;11' � �I Il�lill i lit)! 1 i Ib�:�t�I 'Ii dill (Ifs Id 11111 J11 111111 I+'I►1IRIii !O 16, _If1111111f11111111111W 1111 111 11H111111.111III • { 0 I -_F cc U —J wo,v ear,.c II I II i IIIID I tll I ILII I, . . •JI r N I .i rr +� ' iII 1 iI 1!Ii �' �r 11 11 :... — •I I—•I _I IS I. n4 _� 111101011 7161;m: Y—• �� 0,4 0 wo,v ear,.c rt3gt mow: . #:?! • o•7. I ` I 1 F0-51 0•z, • 0.O r �'7C,P7.t 71;Zti,L OVdVO 1/ • .n, qTz h•17 nnLv,(• 4307 -7X731,1 JQ 9G1F 1,'13 s apc,39:10112111_iggirlisit�x�''•�, ,oLMa,Il N f lid! "MO,* via= •��i1111' 'II .111 miNFII IRA .att rno '° ��oN3Ho11� III 11001-11'�A1 Tnn •7••07 b.0 11, IIUL +\ 73.0 lino> • m, 7..n .25,r.o. �l i yy.Of1 1� zc7•0Z-17 21. xoz•p- 717.•,1 z•>•t� woos ONIA c L of 6• it t s"..-r.5v-rx,3 gni 7.u.-ras3 7a...wsm/ta.i11-1vtl v 7......,441 ..CQ .. ..._ :.00T '511,,,,- .. t1LrJa � an, ca? • Oa - .Oa • 1 v, 5 L ' -29 • oLlGssov7 (., x+414 rart.,o-,zhsv-tdc X92 7iw.va3-71M ex.? tlanxnv Triad -ivy_ �^1L ',.trV1TYJ "'"'�'�'�c4; 47.way •oa, •Gt1 JfIIV=1?a d1t1s 1. 'DI w•da� }t1� .:2131.77144 -• _. So -t S13 7 - - ___ _ - • aQ • GO Q3 'Gra u,orrtlho?d . uvrn.2.racis--x-a •04 ort .1.111vd-,%W<s oc 5tUO(n21QE2 r'r. `' "VAITJ1\yf-. lnrod- 'a -ponds 1ntva-7a1.3+s _i_se,... --,g .-__.LS S`A.21`o•1N U _, w.i --ta's-7-%-)-1-,vrn 's-7-%-)- 0 00--1 -t wao� - '1D'fi �, urvar" 3no7 i,'srrnrm rvc,z . - • 04 - -O,d . • ca -z5 Sd.al-C a&w-„h) 'ten lwz !,av--,- h�"s�4 a4 nr - as'.c-7-1,V 31'107 e7n,-,t-1-,-ti71 /.,4rf 12•itV6•-ra1..,L 'oa Oa w#7747 4X1tI'1r7 � an, . 1::-4 s Won . ,sobyt-Faun.c "mu.os.01s 1olvd•70t.t.t+s • Z 3 ak 134 .- ....-,01-..,-.--�1 • tae; •a Z / -nvb ann....s o_tawvrl ..1<rld4'3lId — - -o !. 'on. . 11:351b; WS doi T.✓ w�i vvwrL nr� 1 �� J.f1NC1 •Mt1115 - • - O6bf►1' ..0.. ` --1--- ..r 1tSvQ2h: orb ootWNt$ • L)- L A w,1 ds • 11.1,4d'ar.td .1.111vd-,%W<s .Clwyd= 7r31t1s -:-” "1AMIN- r'r. `' "VAITJ1\yf-. 11077 1.acorn -i' 7101.7 8 V, 37'RfS1..-1, Ions,. Fl Mi - - 1- - ,•'�-• Vo� 1N 1 +X n •--x�_• `436','3 '0E1 • 1aduv►7 - '1D'fi �, urvar" 3no7 i,'srrnrm rvc,z . 9rw1-,00 • 04 - -O,d . • aq iii �1(r 1 t, 1, 1 ta.L w"7,c_ . • S- -1 '177,1n , T .. -. 3'71-2'sons 3-Inat-,�• j-- 1r1..� ^+/Q1 .. -• 1 _ - 1C�LTT. _yya4T . r♦ Yn_ 1 _A,- ..._ I.. • i•?-• • ;.'• • • • • • tb.?"'-‘'. • di.; .• ' •••..,;(•.1! r, ,• i4..,( -,;•• . 'r • ; • •,.* r • I • • : ' 7_ .‘; . a -v7•12 Q.:41-1(1 —24c371,1 SIQ...L2 ,/;41.14V61..r.r *;''-k=- - -.....—,, - ic ._.,- k • l v.,,g,i.7, 1,141p4ionik ir VII/ Elm rmizaram rlii i Up. iiipage411.9, 111 1..... ..... ,. ..,,!...r!. .........• it as i a 1 111491 01 Il ?Mr i I or.• 4 ".. /flit, .., 111! . le =Ad:- . , -,-. 4./1.0, rr.e.--..... ---m...--._.....-r_...- -..... i ..If .Air 1 , i ,,, .., 0 ... ....._ , . 0 11 , 0 BOUNDARY SURVEY/ MINOR SUBD I VISION REQUEST DESCRIPTIONS Parcel A (Northwesterly Parcel): Lot 5, Block 3, "SOMERSET VIEW" DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota and that part of Lot 4, said Block 3 lying northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 4; thence southeasterly, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 40.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, parallel with the northwesterly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 190.00 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. Parcel B (Southeasterly Parcel):' Lot 3, Block 3, "SOMERSET VIEW" DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota and that 'part of Lot 4, said Block 3 lying southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 4; thence southeasterly, along the northeasterly line of.said Lot 4 a distance of 40.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, parallel withthe northwesterly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 190.00 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets See Survey Report on Sheet 2. 261°,0 ivr 25 • MSM NoA/f/E,Pa -z :ala Owners: Mr. & Mrs. Bertram Parsons Jr. 7 Beebe Avenue Mendota Heights 457-3545 Applicant: Joel Brodd 806 Linwood Avenue St. Paul, MN 55105 224-5884 /1ffG4L U//L/1y syEO z_ cA c Current Zoning: R-1 Date: April 9 and 10, 1986 Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report *as prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minne- sota. —msffiriror Date 4&./.___,./42.f.4 .Req. No...L" 7 J oovs //v pi,he set mowed yo. /6099 • Demo%s fro/2 Ace FaU//o/ '/ 17 4/ -/y -BG 2 i PAUL R. McLAGAN & SON 2`' C'EiV/E.P ac,vez:;'E QS --on, UHE \.36P- • Lv t Ave jaer erroneous chArfn on_ p SOrr1EKSET via -4V and .r s r es.w r v76.41 f T ,4rmsfrw (Th -veyor . f SoM/E/`RSry 100i. resurv� /� / Z (/Bs -Co/'C/ f1 -S.4le 1,9 BOUNDARY SURVEY/ MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST April 14, 1986 Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets SURVEY REPORT The northeasterly line of Lot 3, as shown on sheet 1 hereon, is 66.12 feet. The plat of SOMERSET VIEW shows this distance as 75 feet. This difference is due to a mistake which was made by F. J. Armstrong on the plat of SOMERSET VIEW in 1935. We discovered the mistake when doingour field work and later confirmed it through computations of Blocksl and 3. The north line oLot 1, Block 3 shown as 75.03 should have been 64.93. The south line of Lot 1, Block 1 shown as 54.83 should have been 44.73. More than likely Armstrong mistook a center line distance such as 54.83 as the north line of Ashley Lane instead or some similar misplacement of one of the distances. A further complication is the fact that we found an old irQn pipe at the erroneous NW corner of Lot 1 (75.03 feet west of the NE corner instead of the correctly computed 64.93). After searching the archives of Armstrong's old field notes we were able to confirm from field ties and locations that this was an Armstrong iron either from the original plat in 1935 or from a resurvey of Lots ' 1 and 2, Block 3 by Armstrong in 1941. From these records in 1941 we know where Armstrong placed the lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 and that is where we have replaced them today. We decided to leave Lots 4 through 8, Block 3 as they were originally platted rather than prorate this 10.1 foot error throughout the entire block. Prorating the error through the block would have upset lot lines from 1.1 to 5.5 feet and would have rotated Ashley Lane about 6.5 feet south at the angle point near its easterly end. Since we are sure there was an error in the mathematics on the original plat and that the erroneous data was used by the original surveyor on Lots 1 and 2, we decided to confine the error to that area only rather than disrupt the entire block. The resulting lots remain where they were set by Armstrong and have been occupied for over 40 years, CEMENT STREET D z ,OC ,OC 3S08 30 0291 8311309 9291 N 831 NIM 3>130N11 (..) 9691 4. 7 2391 839V381 6291 XNVHOS A1111 P691 cc2 e cc O ci Q c co N J a- 0 0 Zao 1Y a cc 0Z � IJ.I� cc W Oo Q co Ed Wo z wW o E° J CO W 01 p t0 W LL 13HVd O r BAUMANN z N r a x 13 3NV1 aaO.dSNv1 z 0 CO N Z r 0 f f > 0 r 1 r A 11 W co Z LLI- z 0 0 0 0r 02 In 83IN VX 9ZLI HAMS 91L1 01831VM X3--- 11 NVS X3— n ASS3NH90VHS NOSNVH 11013HOV9 909 IXSNIMOIS rE GV02:1 11V2:11:; XBVd A311VA CLEMENT STREET WENTWORTH PARK D z WENTWORTH ,OE to a tor 0 3508 30 0291 8311308 8291 83.1.NIM 9091 3)i3ONIl 999' £ Z91 8 39113/0 6291 NVH OS 05000+4 9991 3800d 0991 4-1LJ 0w 2 a z 00 7 0 0 o LJJ a 4,1 c)1.4 1,(r I • • =. • • • 9991 )0111 069! 814315 6t9 SIOIT1), 33Vdelf1S ONIAIlG ,22 D CO 0 Pc BACHELOR AVENUE ci _j� Qcr z a- 1- co o_. 2 w h I cr w co cO) E La- 6 (7) W Z < > co w a Co ^) MW MO OW z 0 1— co1— w oz o r UD 3 0 OX ca r.-0 0 re U_ Cr) CO a N.cp 04 nom/strum S831.1119 e no 4691 NOV/AZ NOSNIIH ASS3NHOOVHS 2,LGI NO513N )421Vd A311171) 8013H0119 909 NOSNVH INSNIMOnS ktg 3NV1 02:10ASNV1 .1.31-81S 0 0 tI CIDZ 0 758 BATTIS tr- (44 0 (44 (44 OW 0)4 H.I.IriS 8.1.11•49 9111 - - = = ( • OVON 11V2:11 --- SLG? 0 0 83INC>i 92L Seltic A311 vi)