The URL can be used to link to this page

1976-11-16�� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Dakota County, Minnesota - AGENT}A " November 16, I976 l.l Call to Order. 2.1 Ro].l Call. 3. Approval of Minutes, November 2, 1976. 4. Apgrova]. of Minutes, November 4, 1976 E].ection Canvassing 5. Approval of Minu�es, November 9, 1976. 6. Old Business ' 7 a. Case Na. 76-23, G1.ewwe-- Application for Subdivisian af .�.'c��C�4'.��.e� r�rsNG%e /la�r�a b. Discussian of praposed change order for ClementjVandall project. (Continued from October 19.) Communications- a. Assacia�ion af Metropolitan Municipalities Modes� Co �. Commiitee Report Camments. {Avai3able Tuesday.}--- �� 6. ,Oa�"�u f�u,✓�r ,��¢c. ��'/%lu.J;<<pa /,'�i�s 6',enc-i�at /�'��6Pi's%i,�o Department R�por�.s • a. Police Depar�nent mon�hly report, October, 1976. 9.1 New Business 10 Public Mayor City Administratar �' ��y'�.�'ose ^� CaAsidr'r A�e"si"f �7•'�1L; c=m"uF-� �rs. on �rfaaraRB SS/�rcq'2orrc�s, Coi�ncilmen y�'lo �a bo�- ��y o7"�i �s�ioy�-= /`ffj%�,�7� (.JT City Engineer ' a. Engineering Status Report, October, 1976. City Attorney Clerk-Treasurer � � /p /J//�� „�%c - �� fu� a. �ry�o aa a4 � a� •��T7 n/`� �, Approval of �.he List of Claims. 11� Approval of Licenses: 12� Adjourn. Todara's Plumbing Plumbing Klamm Plumbing & Htg. Plumbing Klarcun Plumbing & Htg. Excavati 0 0 �77i�4 %�onc� . �t%��ldOr(�"� i ✓ Gicense C,icense x License , =� , �T O� CI.AID7S SUEMITTED TO T1iE CUUidCIL FOR l�Y�'FOVAL P OJECTS • 5 25 $ 14,14 .89 Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. 5^� 30, 20 .41 C. W. Houle Cor.ipany ` ' 2,37 .75 Bettenburg Townsend Stolte & Comb, Inc. 5 sU 2,49 .50 Shaugnessy & Company, Inc. 5 85 660,00 .00 Cherokee State Bank 5 41 22 .35 Midwest Wire & Steel Products Co. 5 42 8,08 .36 Bettenburg Townsend Stolte & Cemb, Inc. 5 43 12,00 .19 American National Bank & Trust Company 5 44 65 .00 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 5 45 1,70 .00 Northern States Power Company 5 46 1.00 Tw*in City Testing 5 47 3.28 Chapin Publishing Company 5 48 33 .75 Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Company P YROLL 5 40 $ 10,78 .94 MINISTRATION 5 19 5 9 5250 53 0 52 1 5' 5 52 4 52 5 53 1 53 2 53 3 52 6 52 7 52 8 52 9 52 0 52 1 52 2 52 3 52 4 52 5 52 6 52 7 52 8 52 9 52 0 52 1 52 2 52 3 5" 5.. 52 6 52 7 5 8 $ 25 .00 2 .00 1 .86 47.50 .25 1 .98 9.35 8 .64 139.93 9.78 9.78 9.78 29.90 52.90 52.90 31.05 36.13 35 65 35 65 31 05 36 13 36 80 30 48 30 48 30 48 35 65 35 65 33 35 33 35 34 50 35 65 35 65 35 65 32 78 32 78 Dakota County State Bank Julie Smith Wager's Inc. Suburban Stationers Inc. Paymaster Associates, Inc. Graphic Design, Inc. Nelson's Office Supply Store Mid West Carbon Company Computer Eelction Systems, Inc. Kathleen M. Swanson Dolores Hess Elizabeth Witt Mary Shaughnessy Norace D. Brown � F?arriet C. bSetcalfe Rita Maczko Martha E. Carlson Sally L. Countryman Evelyn b�oravec Eileen biullen June R. Wagner Ruth Grunke � Laurita Weinzettel Betty J. Anderson Virginia R. Simek Hubert R. Meier Marguerite R. Julkowski Sarah Bradford Wilfred Dehrer Ann Specktor Jean A. Burke Janet deLambert Helen Frye Genevieve Murphy Marilynn K. VanZyl Evelyn Fischer 16, 1�+76 Const. payment - Imp. 74-8 " " Imp. 75-8 Engineering - Im . 76-1 Service fee - $5 0,000 I.B.'76 Investments Wire & posts - I p. 75-2 Engineering & in pections - Imp. 73-: 74-3 & 8; 75-2 & 8. Bond payments Municipal bond r ting service Underground serv'ce - Imp. 74-3 Soil testing - I p. 74-3 Ad. for bids - I . 76-1 Sign supplies - p. 74-3 & 75-2 & 8. Net payroll 11/15�/76 Clerical office p' Typewriter repair Office supplies Name plate Office supplies Office supplies ' Copy paper Election supplies Overtime hours - ] Election judge �� -time Election peace of icer Election judge �� " demonstr tor " judge �� v_�._ ..�_.. �� m demonstr tor peace of ice: judge �� peace of icer judge registra judge �� demonstr�tor :� i' C7�' CL1��MS I StiIINsITTE:D TO THE COU'NCIL FUR APPROVAL 5�79 � - 4 3 24 5 83 5 84 S 24 5 86 5 87 S 89 P LICE 5 50 $ 5 90 S 91 5 92 5 93 5 94 5 95 S 96 5 97 1 DEPA 5 �8 $ 5 99 5 04 5 02 5 28 5 03 TION con'�. ` 2 .90 Leslie Troeltzsch 3 .20 George Ziemer m 3 .50 Dorathy Troeltzsch 3 .24 Margare� Fagelson 3 .24 Maarjorie Cheesebrow .7$ He1en M. Bates 2 .00 North Star Chapter 3.07 Dakota County Tribune, Inc. 4.7b Dakata Caunty State Bank ].,00 .00 Howard Dahlgren Associates �0 .04 I.D.S. .45 Suburban Statianers, Inc. 4.05 Dabelow Ponta.ac Buick Inc. 2 .2? Traii Dodge, Ina. 5 .74 Southview Chevro].et Company 12 ,48 Fischer's "66" 10 .30 Conway Fire & Safety, Inc. 54 .27 Arneson-Zytaiec Oil Company 1 .77 Gudgel's .85 Laurence Bridger 7.79 City Motar SuPP�Y, Inc. EN 19 .89 Kremer �pring & AZignment, Inc. 1 .05 Fury Motors, Inc. 12 .SO R.E.P.S., Inc. 10 .50 Safeco I,ife Insurance Company 1 .00 Oxygen Service Company 3 .25 Northwestern Bell .00 Fire Chief Nagazine AD & BRiDGE EPA 28 $ 1 .15 Q4 7'.71 05 1 , 91 06 23 .08 d7 23 , 61 sLzc uTrz�zT 28 $ 29 1 08 09 10 10,2 Northwestern Bell riidwest P_uto Supply & Machine Ci�y Mo�.or Supply, Ina. Pine Bend Paving Tnc. Cargill Salt Dept. > DEPARTMENT Novembe�' 16, 1976 Election registr r '� peace a fi.cer " judge �� ,� « „ �� Bu3.Iding of�icia annual dues Publishing legal notices Septe�nber payrol service October retainer P.nnuity payment Office supp2zes Repair service Repairs � Gasoline & servi. e Fire extinguishe s Gasoline Ammuni�ion suppl. es Reimbursement fo dry cleaning Repairs Repairs �� Scott a3.r pak Pr�nium Oxygen Service Subscription Service Repairs �� Road fi].1 Deicing sal� .52 Northwestern Bell Service .32 Northern States Power Service .47 Valley Equipment Company Repair parts .00 Mendota Heights Ruhbish Service, Inc. Service .51 Metxopolitan Waste Control Comm. December sewer charges LIST OF CLAIMS �tiBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL , Nove�nber 16, 1�76 DEPARThiEIQ ' 53p9 $ 5" 5 53 1 53 2 53 3 53 4 53 5 5 6 5 17 5 18 Di 27.00 Mendota Heights Rubbish Service, Inc. 19.14 Northern States Power 23.52 Northwestern Bell 1,110.00 Mendota Heights Landscape Service 24.32 Dickey Company .95 Southview Garden Center 16 .72 Carron Net Company, Inc. 4 .25 Ries Electric Company 3 .35 Shaw Lumber Company 1.41 Board of Water Co�unissioners 39 .00 Case Power & Equipment ts $ 760,624.27 Sercice Service Service Tree removal serv Supplies Bone meal Hockey nets Service Supplies Service Equipment rental e e a � 0 Page 74 3 Nov�mber 2, 1976 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Pu suant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of th Ci y of Mendota Heights was held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. at City Hall Pl za Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Ac ing Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock fo lowing members were present: Acting Mayor Lockwood, Councilmen Me tensotto and S9ahl. Mayor Huber had notified the Council that '. of town. Councilman Wahl moved approval of the minutes October 5 meeting with correction. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ay�s: 4 Na s: 0 Acting Mayor Lockwood moved approval of the m October 19 meeting. Councilman Mertensotto seconded the motion. s: 4 s: 0 PAYMENT Councilman Mertensotto moved the adoption of "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINA (IMPROVEMENT NO. 73, PROJECT NO. 2)," approvi payment of $17,060.09 to Fischer Sand and Agg completed on Marie Avenue improvements, Dodd Avenue. � Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Aye�s : 4 Nav�s : 0 City Council, 750 South .M. The �sleben, would be out of the � of the solution No. 76-87; PAYMENT � the final gate for work ad to Victoria I FALLS i�TEST Mr. James Riley was present to request that a id award be made BI AtaARD � for Ivy Falls West (Phase IIj improvements sub'ect to filing of the final plat. It was the concensus of th Council that the plat should be properly recorded prior to a bi award, and that the matter should be continued to November 9. CAS� NO. 76-17, ACA IA PAR1C Acting Mayor Lockwood opened the meeting for t a hearing on an application for conditional us Acacia Park Cemetery for a utility building. representing the applicant, made a presentatio plans for the Council. He noted that any sand cement �vill be stored inside. Acting Mayor Lo questions and comments from the audience. purpose of permit from . Carl Cummins, of the proposed gravel and wood asked for There being no questions or comments, Council. n Wahl moved that the hearing be closed and moved the adoption o Resolution No. 76-88, "RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT," incorporating the conditions recommended by th P�lanning • Commission and the condition that the present tility structure be removed or razec� within 90 days after const uction of the . ,. 4 s: 0 Page 744 November 2, 1976 new build�ng. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. The hearing was closed at 8:37 o'clock P.M. E NO. 76-14, The Covncil acknowledged receipt of a letter f S OF JACOB Mr. Stuart Radsom, attorney for the Congregati of Jacob „ requesting that the hearing on the conditional use permit for a synagogue be cont December 7. The Council also acknowledged rec from Mr. & Mrs. Eric Miller, 1162 Veronica Lar. approval of the Conditional Use Permi.t. � Councilman Mertensotto moved that the hearing December 7. Acting Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. s: 4 s: 0 n of the Sons ?plication for nued to ipt of a letter , supporting continued to CH GE ORDER, Councilman Losleben moved that discussion on he proposed I ROVEMENT NO. Change Order to the Clement/Vandall improveme t project be 74 PROJECT NO. 8 continued to November 16. Acting Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Ay s : 4 Na s : 0 LANDS SYSTEM INANCE s: 4 s: 0 Planning Consultant iioward Dahlgren presented and reviewed the final draft of the proposed Wet�ar�ds System O dinance and associated r.lap for the Council. After�a brief discussion, Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of Ordinance No. 140, "WETLANDS SYST M ORDINANCE." Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. PI1�v_�_�?G-•�02�1MISSION The Council acknowledged receipt of the minut�s of the � October 26 Planning Commission meeting. N0. 76-23, The Council briefly discussed the proposed s division and �E S�BDI'�ISION requested that Mr. & Mrs. Glewwe consider and approve of the -- Planning Consultant's recommendation to reduc the proposed new lot depth by 20 feet. ;s: "4 �s : 0 NO. 76-25, ' VARIANCE Acting Mayor Lockwood moved that further disci subdivision application be tabled to November Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. After a brief discussion, Councilman Losleben of the application for variance requested by 1003 Chippewa Avenue, granting a seven foot v �ssion on the 16. moved approval � Ir. Joseph S. Ernst, .riance from the � / s: 4 s: 0 Page 7�5 November 2, 1976 sideyard setback and t�aenty-seven foot varian e from the rear yard setback requirement at 1003 Chippew Lane to allow construction of a garage. - Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. 3E NO. 76-26, Mr. Thomas Condon was present to request app JDON SUBDIVISION application for the subdivision of 2511 Dodd presented a revised Certificate of Survey to requested by the Planning Commission. �s: 4 �s : 0 of an .. Mr. Condon Council as was After a brief discussion, Councilman Wahl mov d approval of the subdivision, contingent upon receipt of a sat sfactory park contribution. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. N0. 76-28, Mr. Peter Wolff, representing Mr. Lynn Johns ON VARIANCE request approval of a sidey,ard setback varia Drive to allow bir. Johnson to expand his pre variance as requested would allow the garage constructed to within 20 feet from Cascade L After a brief discussion, Acting Mayor Lo variance be approved as requested. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. �s : 4 �s : 0 , was present to � at 689 Arcadia nt garage. The xpansion to be a. moved that the 110 TRAIL AND Planning Consultant Dahlgren reviewed the con epts of bicycle/ SRPASS pedway needs and presented a tentative scheme for an overpass over T.H. 110. He explained the FAU grant ap lication considerations and his feeling that Mendota H ights should pursue federal funding. After considerable discussion, the Council in ormally approved preparation of an application for FAU funding and directed that the Planning Commission proceed on the matter and invite the Park Commission participation in any studies n trail.s and a . Tii 110 overpass. CATIONS The Council acknowledged receip� of a letter rom Mr. & Mrs. Harlan Anderson, 2119 Patricia Str et, in apprecia for the Council's action on the recent Lexing on Avenue noise abatement petition and sUbsequent "No Truck T affic" posting of Lexington Avenue. The Council acicno�aledged receipt of a letter Minnesota Energy Agency regarding the Agency' federal funding of a demonstration project tc infrared aerial photographs. �Erom the � application for disseminate 0 f� November 2, 1976 Page 746 . Councilman Losleben moved that the Minnesota : be notified of the desire for Mendota Heights in the demonstration project. Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. Ay s : 4 ' Pda s : 0 MI CELLANEOUS ME ROPOLITAN [�� TE COIdTROL CO ISSION Ay s : 4 b'a s : 0 � s: 4 s: 0 The Council acknowledged receipt of the Fire report for September, 1976. Acting Mayor Lockwood moved that Joint Use No. 155 be renewed for 1977. Councilman Losleben'seconded the motion. CANVASSING Acting Mayor Lockwood moved that an Election meeting be established for 7:00 P.t�., Novem Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. � 0 ;nergy Agency to be included partment monthly ital Agreement vassing Board 4. MATNTENAIQCE Attorney �ainthrop presented a proposed agreem nt with Sheehy Properties relative to the maintenance of the ponding area . for which a conditional use permit was grante by the Council on April 6,•1976. � After a brief discussion, Councilman Mertenso the Acting Mayor and City Clerk be authorized execute the agreement. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Ay�s: 4 Na.��s : o TION FOR 'I'he Council acknowledged and discussed a memo UVEMENTS Inspector Pearson regarding a petition for st water improvements on Mayfield Heights Lane. recommended that the City Engineer be directe feasibility report on the requested improveme ;s: 4 �s : 0 SS EQ�IPiiL'ivT- �to moved that and directed to from Public Works eet, sewer and Mr. Pearson to prepare a ts. Councilman 47ah1 moved the adoption of Resolut on No. 76-89, "RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AN ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS." Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged-receipt of a memo fr m Public Works Inspector Pearson regarding disposal of surpl s, inactive and unclaimed equipment. The equipment includes: a 1970 Plymouth sedan, a.1972 Plymouth sedan, an Essex Roller, 16 voting booths; and several bicycles, a washer and dryer whic have been in the custody of the Police Department and unclaime for at least six months. . I I ' m Page 747 � November 2, 1976 � Councilman Losleben moved that the list of i by the Police Chief and Public Works Inspect and that the items be disposed of in accorda Ordinance No. 912 and applicable Statutes co _ and disposal of municipal properties. Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. �es : 4 iys : 0 :ST OF CLAIMS A es: 4 N ys: 0 L CEI�TSE s: 4 s: 0 OU RN Councilman Losleben moved the adoption of th motion: RESOLVED, that the claims submi.tted to the C payment, a sunmary of which is attached here List of Claims submitted for payment, Novemh been audited by the City Council be and are the Mayor and Clerk-Treasurer are hereby aut to issue checks in pay-ment of said claims. Acting Mayor Lockwood seconded the motion. Acting Mayor Lock�aood moved approval of the granting licenses to: Anco Construction Corporation General Sun Mechanical & Electrical Co. Plumbin Trana and Craven Masonry Masonry Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. There being no further business to come befoz Acting Nayor Lockwood moved that the meeting 7:30 o'clock P.M., Tuesday, November 9. Councilnan �4ah1 seconded the motion. s: 4 s: 0 E OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:45 o'clock P.M. e G. Lockwood Mayor � G.M. Radabaugh Clerk-Treasurer ' I , ems submitted r be declared surpl ce with crning the purchase following Council for and identified as 2, 1976, having eby allowed and ized and directed t of licenses, License icense cense the Council, ' adjourned to t, 0 � r Pa�e 748 Novemb�r �, 19 6 CITY OI', MENDOTA H�IGI�ITS DAICOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Election Canvassing Board Meeting Held November 4, 1976 - Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council Cit of 1�4endota Fieights sat as the Election Canvassing Bo� mee ing was held at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City iiall, 7� Pla a Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. j Act� The Los] thai ng Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:00 following members were present: Acting D4ayor Lockwood eben, P•4ertensotto and Wahl. I��ayor Huber had notified he would be out of town. Acting Mayor Lockwood moved that the Canvassin Board approve the results of the counting and canvass of votes by ballot at the General Elec of the City of Mendota Heights, held November The minutes of the City Election, submitted by Clerk of Election, showed the following result Canc�idates for Mayor Ro1� rt G. Lockwood Joh L. Murphy lank Ballots Prec. #1 �2 n3 �#4 602 509 358 677 507 351 221 434 108 96 76 95 1,217 956 655 1,206 ! of the �rd; the i0 South o'clock P.M. Councilmen the Council ion , 1976. the tal ,146 , 513 375 ,034 ` Canc�idates for Councilman Prec. �l r2 #3 �4 '�'otal Joh Hartmann DZic ael L. Kluznik Jam s P. Losleben Cha les E. tiTertensotto Jam s E. Schaberg Wil iam J. Steinke Jam s H. Thomas Blank Ballots Aye : 5 Nay : 0 407 274 185 297 295 182 137 269 394 552 266 543 467 500 320 545 505 322 242 514 410 239 _ 185 389 470 233 �170 376 676 563 460 667 3,624 2,865 1,965 3,600 ,163 883 ,755 ,832 ,583 ,223 ,249 ,366 1 ,054 Rohert G. Lockwood was declared Mayor, term of two years, January l, 1977 through Decemher 31, 19 8; James P. Losleben and Charles E. Mertensotto w re declared elected Councilmen, term of four year , January l, 1977 through Decemher.31, 1980; James E. Schaberg was declared elected Council an, term of two years, January l, 1977 through December.31, 1978. Motion seconded by Councilman Wahl. � � "Y w Page 74� Novemher 2, 1976 Ther� being no further business to come before Canvassing Board, Councilman Losleben moved th the meeting be adjourned. riotion seconded by Acting I�layor Lockwood. Aye : 5 Nay : 0 Time of Adjournment: 7:22 P.2�I. ATTEST: Rob�rt G. Lockwood, Acting riayor BY G.M. P.adabaugh, Clerk• 0 the at Treasurer n Ey Page 750 November 9, 1976 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting Held Tuesday, November 9, 1976 :suant to due call and notice thereof, the adjourned meeting of :y of Mendota Heights was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City �za Drive, Mendota Heights, riinnesota. City Council, , 750 South � A ing Mayor Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:n0 o'clock .M. The f llowing members were present: Acting Mayor Lockwood, Councilmen sleben and W 1. Councilman Mertensotto had notified the Council that he wou d be late. M or Huber had notified the Council that he would be out of town. B AWARD, IVY Acting Mayor Lockwood noted that the meeting ad been adjourned F LLS WEST ADDITION from the regular meeting of November 2 for th purpose of award- ing the bid for the Ivy Falls West improvemen project. Mr. James Riley stated, and City Administrato Johnson confirmed, that the final plat had been filed with the D kota County Auditor during the day. i : 3 : 0 After a brief discussion, Acting Mayor Lockwo adoption of Resolution No. 76-90, "RESOLUTION AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAN STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 75, PROJECT NO. 3, awarding the bid to Fischer Sand and Aggregat of $169,489.51. Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. Councilnan Mertensotto arrived at 7:55 o'cl d moved the ACCEPTING BIDS TARY SEWER, WATER, HE IVY FALLS WEST TAGE II)," , Inc. in the amou P.M. ES'I'I�SENTS Councilman Wahl moved that the Clerk-Treasure be authorized to invest $360,000 £or three months and $300,000 for six months with the Cherokee State Bank at 5�% interest. � Councilman Losleben seconded the motion. s: 4 • s. 0 A es: 4 N ys: 0 A TEST: There being no further business to come befoz Councilman Losleben moved that the meeting be Councilman Wahl seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNNLNT: 8:07 o'clock P.M. w Bc�bert G. Lockwood, Acting Mayor � G.M. Radabaugh Clerk-Treasurer s the Council, adjourned. 1 ��r' �; 15, �976 ..- . .. , . a _., -... . � lJe eJ��and an.d afifviec.i.cr�e y,Qu�i cartce�irt �a�i m.t� dre�-t �n,c.i.a.0 .in,t e�� ,n, exc,Lud,i.n,c� �h.e 20 �ee.t o� .th.e are�� .La� -uc �h.e �c.t,lr- � d.i.v '.i.a2 a� �h.e C.Lervure p.a�ice.l.. _ ffocu eh, a� .tlws .Co.t a.nd p�ia�x�r.tc� .Geh,i,nd -i.t mee.t U�i.l.Lcu�e .l.oat �iecx ' emen,#�s crn.d �h.ocv� d Rv•s��i..11-Le �rczy, .to tt�e �h,i� -Lund -i.n. �h,e ' �u,tc e (a� �ha�n. .i.n. .the �ecr�.�,G.i.l�i.tc� �.t.�.cd.c�), 9 �h.eJi��i.e n.ec�c��.t ' c�o u d�.ryLa ve .th,i�s d.a� cvs Q dru,i.Ld.u�.c� •s.i,te a� p�ie� en,ted �a u a ; w � cr.t czn.� cli.an.cye. ; 1Je ou,(.d d.r_k.e �o .than.� .the Gi.tc� Catuzc.i.L a.rtd P-l�ruu:ng Car,un,v��.i.on � �a�i �th.p.i�r. �.i.me, ddv�e,nen,t cutd dc,t,i.on. an �h..v� raa,t.teh. � I � ' � , ', � (II� . Il1a�i.ire C�.Le.�rure . 595 �L�t.g-h�va,c� 7 7 0 i ' I _;_ '1, � - 1..: �� 1 , /// �-, �,.,� �C 1 ��'=�i�"--�� /, j / �j�l�'L/ I �I � 0 0 i i. » Y s �yt ;j� �.: _. • , a � ia� �;on of rr�� itan m�ni�� a ities MODEST COST HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT COMMENTS Che draft report of the Metropolitan Counci�:s Modest ost �ousing Committee has been reviewed by the Associatio of 9etropolitan Municipalities (AMM) through its Housin Ad= �isory Committee (HAC). The HAC report was reviewed and �dopted by the AMM Board of Directors on November 4, 1 76. >ection I of this report contains general comments and ob- �ervations; Section II contains specific comments re1� •tive :o the twenty-two recommendations put.forth by the Council�s ?odest Cost Housing Committee; -and, Section III contains a >ummary of the major conclusions arrived at b� the AM HAC ind the AMM Board of Directors. ADOPTED BY AMM HAC - November 2, 1976 ADOPTED BY AMM BOARD OF DIRECTORS - November 4, .� 300 Hanover Buildinq, 480 Cedar Street, St. Pau1, 5:�101 � MODEST COST HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT AMM COMMENTS, OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS I. GENERAL COMMENTS t should be indicated that this report basically deal odest cost single family detached housing, It is imp hat this distinction is made in view of the fact that robably is unrealistic to place much emphasis on prov ffordable housing for moderate and low income persons he traditional single family detached housing type of truction. 2. ased on the data contained throughout the baclsground ormation sections of the Modest Cost Housing Committe eport, it is very clear that the biggest single cost wning a home in terms of the homeowners monthly payme �e cost of financing (interest), Upwards of 50% of 'cal monthly payment is f°or interest charges. In spit his fact, the MCHC Report does not contain even one r ation or suggestion for dealing with that problem. T ecommendation that even relates to financing suggests he allowable rate of interest that can be charged in hould be allowed to increase! That recommendation m eneficial for a number of other reasons but it has no ul relationship to the problem the MCHC was assigned with rtant it ding through con- nd in- ( MCHC ) tem of t is he typ- of commen- e one that innesota y be meaning- o address. 3. t is obvious that isolated cases of municipal and/or ther overnmental requirements (worst examples) are used an pre- ented as the norm or typical case to justify the find'ngs, onclusions and recommendations presented by the MCHC. The ery credibility of° the MCHC Repo�t suffers from those types f over generalizations. 4. �he AMM Board of Directors is very disturbed'by the ob� �f balance contained in the MCHC recommendationse A c� .mination of the statistics and background data provid� �arious sections of the MCHC Report clearl,y indicate t: ocal g:o.vernmental xequirements have. only. mi-nor �i�mpact� ost of housing ( or cost:'_of owning a home ) compared to ther major cost factors. -1- �ious lack .reful ex- �d in the �at the o.n the several Yet� the other factors (such as fin�ncing costs as note second general comment) are virtually ignored, with th assumption that nothing can really be done about such I is not very productive to keep blaming local govern t e high cost of housing and almost totally ignore the factors and actors, 5. Several st�.tements contained in the MCHC Report x°efer o'indirectly to the costs resulting f°rom delays exper t e builders �.nd developers in getting the necessary a f r housing developmentsa It is implied that local un government�are mostly to blame ior these delays. In r any of° the delays are not caused by lo.cal units at al result from requirements imposed hy other levels of go The builders/developers are often responsible for the processing time involved in obtaining the necessary ap or their projeets, The builder/developer induced del lly result when. they attempt to skirt the local requi do not take time to adequ�.tely f°�,miliarize themselves equirements or are not sensitive to the environmenta�. and topogr�.phy oi the developmeni site. The AMM Boar ectors agrees that a strong eff°ort should be made by olved parties to streamline and simpTify the proeedur rocess for granting approvals f°or housing projects. ocal government should not be singled out as the majo rit" in this matter, Further, it should be recognize eport that much of° the delay or lengthy approval proc ime occurs when the developer makes a non-conforming ommunities have been strongly eneouraged•for many yea: elop loc�l comprehensive plans (now mandated) and, co: 'f a development proposal is made which is not consist hese local plans, time� is needed to properly evaluate roposal and its possible adverse impact on the local nd adjacent units of government. The AMNI Board.of D eels that once again isolated and unusual cases witho� riate explanation have been used to depict the "norma: ion" when such is not the case. � n examination of° the f�.etors that af°f°ect the cost of eing produced today indieates that some of° the "pract nwritten requirements" of the lending 3:nstitutio.ns ar 'ng the builders to,load up the houses with costly ame nd certain design features that virtually prohibit th ion of modest cost affordable housing. This concern ery briefTy at one of the meetings of the MCHC, but w aid to rest because of cer�ain "sensitivities" that p pen discussion of this matter in that particular sett ur concern about MCHC eomposition under Reco-mmendatio uture Study), We think it urger_t that this concern be s soon as possible in �.n impartial and open manner. -2- in our implied �etors. �nt for ia j or irectly .enced by �provals ts of ality, but ernment. engthy rovals ys norm- ements, ith the concerns of Di- 11 in- s and owever, "cul- in this ssing roposal. s to de- sequently, nt with such a �ammunity rectors t appro- situa- ousing ces. and forc- ities produc- as raised s quickly �ecluded _ng. ( See i 22, addressed 7. The AMM Board of Directors is concerned because while it re- cognizes that some of the recommendations could possibly �ro- vide the opportunities for the production of lower cost hous! ing, there is no built-in mechanism or assurance that any of the cost savings would be passed on to the consumer. We ar� particularly s:e.nsitive to this issue in view of the experience with the adoption of'the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The major argument of the UBC proponents was that this would re- sult in a cost savings to the consumer. Analysis of the ris.- ing housing costs over the past several years doe s not sup- port this contention. II. SPECIFIC COMMENTS INTRODUCTION: The AMM Bo.ard of Directors has reviewed the specific recom- mendations in detail. It is our feeling that these recom- mendations, even if implemented, would in actuality do lit- tle to lower the cost of housing by any significant degree. Additionally, it should be clearly recognized that most of the recommendations would not result in a reduction of total cost but would result in either a cost shift from new home owners to aYa�ger segment of the community or would delay some of the front end costs to a later date, which might prove more costly in the long run. Finally, our comments relate directly to the MCHC recommendations and should not be interpreted to mean that we support any of the recommen- dations but that if these recommendations are going to be considered by the Metropolitan Council and the Legislature, then they should be modified as indicated in the following pages. -3- REC �� RECOMMENDATIONS [ENDATION l, ADVISORY STANDARDS< OMMENT: The �MIVI Bo�rd of Directors concur� that all rds should be advisory. It is �lso the feeling of th oard• that the specific standards being recommended n itional study. The AMM B��rd ofl Dii°ectors suggests t ouncil or whichever agency is going to further evalua tandards consider an area density st�nd�rd (dwelling er acre) as opposed to a specifi� lot size. The AMNt irectors agrees that garage ar.d house size requiremen ot be contained in zoning ordinan�eso Requirements hose elements should be as spe�ified by the UBC. t is also important to recognize that substantial.ly r ot size and other requirements,such as side yard set- tc,, usually result in the necessity f°or putting in a o that vital. munieipal services, �uch as fire protect e provided to the homeownerso The installation of a nd security lighting and maintenance of alleys can pr e, a costly item. TraditionaZly, there has been a mix izes in each community through the establishmen.t of z istricts and we favor the continuation of s.uch a mix. reased density standards and/or red�ced lot sizes sho ur only ir_ those portions ��° a eommunity where the ph acilities and social service systems are or can be de o accomodate and to serve greater population densitie ATION 2. :'FUNDING FOR STANDARDS EV:ALUATION. �_.__..�, . ,. OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors concurs that much io�na�l work is needed concerning advisory standards. ent duplication and unnecessary costs, this efiort sh ade a part of a total study which we h�ve recommended iously; namely, a Housing Market A.nalysis Studya Sin oubtful that the shortage� of adequate housing for low oderate�income persons can be appreciably reduced thr uction� of° single family detaehed h�ousing, multi-famil ng standards should be emphasized in any such studya- oard of° Uirectors believes in the "fair-share" concep elates to mode.st cost housing that that any such '�fai oncept and criteria must be develaped very cautiousl airly to provide the opportunity for real local input he unique differences which exis-� from community to c re properly recognizedo RECOM�VIENDATION 3. INCENTIVESo OMMENT: The AMIuf Board of Directors is in gener�.l ag tand- AMM. ed ad- at the e these nits ' oard of s should or ducing acks�, leys on, can leys ve to of lot ning In- ld oc- sical igned addi- To pre- uld be pre- e it is and ugh pro- hous- The AMM as it -share" and so that mmunity ement that an incentives approach rather than a disincentives (Po1- icy 31) approach is a step in the right direction. Again, this must be structured very carefully so that all communities would be able to take advantage of the incentives. (Concern: some communities may already be fully developed based on zan- ing and sub-division standards and criteria that would not meet the advisory standards developed). It is our strong feeling that this task should not be delegated to the MCHC. Also�, �e suggest that local communities be given the necessary tools and authority to require that bui�ders and developers build a certain amount of modest cost housing in each housing develop- ment. RECOMMENDATION �. COUNCIL EXISTING AUTHORITY, COMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors agrees with this recom- mendation but doubts that it will lead to the production of more modest cost housing because the local community has no real leverage to assure that the developers will build modest cost housing even when the opportunity exists. (See our con- cerns expressed in Recommendations 2 and 3 relative to advis- ory standards and criteria,development). ' RECOMMENDATION 5. IF PROGRESS IS NOT MADE. COMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors does not agree with this recommendation for several reasons, including the following: a) b) This, in effect, would truly make the Council a general purpose unit of government with police po�ers (zoning control) and the Metropolitan Council should not be given such authority; � T here is no substantive evidence that 1oca1 units of government are a significant deterrent to the construc- tion of modest cost housing (see Pgs. 73, 7�, 75 and 76 of MCHC Report ); c) A large part of local land use policies are actually be- ing dictated by lending institutions; d) Local units presently have no too'ls to require builders to construct modest cost housing; and, e) This recommendation does not recognize the more substan- tive factors that preclude the produetion of modest cost housing. RECOMMENDATION 6e MUSA. COMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors agrees with the first para- graph of this recommendation, but has reservations concerning the authority of the Council to require local units to allocate -5- REC REC REC REC sufficient land" for residential construction as note in he second paragraph. The term "sufficient" is just t o ebulous. Also, it is impossible for some municipalit es o set aside "sufficient land" because some municipali ies o not have any open land available. Therefore, this ust e looked at from a community to"community basis, DATION 7. ONE-AND-TWO-FAMILY DWELLING CODEe OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors feels"that this r com- endation needs more justification and investigation. This ode is currently out of print and, consequently, it c uld ot be analyzed by the appropriate local officials. his ew suggested code should be analyzed in detail by the 5tate uilding Code officials and the State Building Code St ndards ommittee. [ENDATION $. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL. ONiMENT: The AMM Board.of Directors agrees with this ecom- endation conceptually but feels more background infor ation ustifying the recommendation should be presented in t e doc- ment text. [ENDATION 9. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors agrees with this endation conceptually but has some concerns relative pecifics of implementation. The AMM Boar� of Directo eels that the terms "environmental assessment" and "e ental impact statements" need clarification to point ifferences. Also, the AMM Board of Directors is conc bout the potential cost impact on the local units in ng comprehensive plans to the detail and extent neede atisfy all environmental questions. The recommendati lso specify that this would apply only to that area i al community which is zoned or will be zoned for sin.g ousing. This recommendation should be re-written to hat "when proposed residential sub-divisions are cons ith local comprehensive plans which cortain detailed ental assessments, an environmental impact statement ot be needed unless the project is of inetropolitan si ance." NDATION 10. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE. OMMENT: Strike the words "as required" in the seconc � ecom- o the s uiron- ut the rned repar- to n should a lo- e family ndicate stent nviron- ould nifi- line for clarification. The AA!IIVI Baard of Direetors wanders what the relationship is between historieal significance and the eharge of the MCHC and�if there is really a serious enough problem to justify the expense of this survey or if this suggestion is based on one or two isoZated cases whieh has caused a developer some minor delay. However, if such a sur- vey 3.s completed by the State this information should not restriet Iocal governments' rights andJor responsibilities far determining land use. ' REGOMMENDATION 11, COST OF PUBLIC II�IPROVEMENT. COMMENT: It is the und.erstaz�ding of the AMM Board of Di- rectors �hat this situation is aTready covered by existing 1aw. Perk�aps; this is another isolated case of an unusual. situatian that is forming the basis for anather generaliza- tion. We suggest that more definit3on be prova,ded so that there is a clear understanding of wha.t the problem is or what 3s �the real purpose for this recommendation. RECOMMENDATION 12. yETTER OF CREDIT. COMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors, in principle, supports -Gh��s �recammenda-�a.an if it can be structured and used { letter af credit) in such a fashion to guarantee devel.opers satis- factory performan.ce as determined by the city, whieh is the reason for a performanc�e bond in the first place. The performance bond provides the municipality with the needed l.everagefto assure that the developer I.ives up to the per- f'ormance agreement with the local municipa]:ity. We are can- cerned abaut the problems this may ereate far the munieipal- ity and the adverse 3:mpact it may actually have on producing madest cost housing. RECOMMENDATION 13. OPTION TQ CONTRACT FOR PUBLTC IMPROVEMENT. COMMENT: The AMM Baard of Directar� disagrees with this re= commendation unless the following wards are added "as 1.ong as i� is done aceard�.ng -ta eity speeificatians and cer�ified as sueh". ' RECOMMENDATI4N 14. PARK DEDTGATSON �'EES. CQMMENT: The AMM Board of D3rectors ba.s.ie.ally concurs wit"h this recammendat3.on exeept the ward "raw" should be stricken and the f`o1l.awing phrase added "at the time the municipality exereises it� Iand or cash option �o take either land or eash" _7.. RECOM�ENDATION 15. SAC OMMENT: The ANIlVI Board of Directors feels that the oncept merits more study. RECOMIt�ENDATION 16. ABOLISH LIMITED MARKET VALUE. le SAC OMMENT: The AMM has been in support of eliminating t e lim- ted market value concept since 197/� and is still in s pport f elimination. RECOMI�IENDATION 17. GREEN ACRES STUDY=. OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors agrees with this endation. RECOMI�IENDATION 1$. SALES TAX EXEMPTION. �ecom- OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors questions how thi recom- endation could be implemented and administ.ered in a f ir and fficient manner. RECOM�/IENDATION 19. PUBLIC FINANCING RATES FOR DEVELOPER IN�TALLED IMPROVEMENTS. OMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors is concerned abou the mpact this might have on the municipalities' bond rat'ng. ., owever, as long as the option for making this choice °s left p to the individual municipal governing body, the AMM Board f Directors has no objection. Again, it is the feeli g of he AMM Board of Directors that this recommendation, i im- lemen.ted, would have negligible impact on reducing th cost f housing.. RECOM�VIENDATION 20. U5URY LAW. OMMENT: The ANINI Board of Directors is neither suppor ing or pposing this,recommendation principally because it ma be eneficial to the overall economy of this state if this recom- endation were to be implemented. However, the AMM Board of irectors does question if allowing interest rates to ise will esult in a reduction of housing costs, which we understand to e the focus of this committee. (See General Comment No. 2). 0 � �EC_OMMENDATION 21. INDUSTRY PRACTICES. COMMENT: The AMM Board of Directors agrees with the perceived in,tT ent of this recommendation. This is to try and find a means to actually determine if builders are willing to be innovative (and if financial institutions are willing to support innova- tibn) and design and construct modest cost affordable housing and if, in fact, there is a viable market for this type of hous- ing. We feel that if it is to be a true test of the market and of the builders and financial institutions willingness to de- velop to this market; the test case or scenario needs to be de- veloped along the following liness a) The builder/developer would have to secure his/her own fi- nancing in the market place (no interest subsidies-no guar- anteed sale). b) Municipal restrictions (lot size, house size:, set-backs, etc.) would be waived to be in accordance with the,stand- ards recommended in Recommendation 1. c) Builder/developer selects the property but it must be with- , in the�MUSA line. d) Sufficient units produced so that people wauldn't buy them just as a novelty or because it is one of a kind. :��.e,.)� Builder/develoger would have to warrant the house for de- fects for a two year period of time. RECOMMENDATION 22. FUTUftE STUDY. COMMENT: The AMM Board of Dire�ctors agre.es tYiat muc.h future work remains to be done. We feel, however, that all follow-up activity needs to be well coordinated andS directed as to what sub.jects need further study and what pro.jects should be under- taken. We feel this can best be handled through existing per- nanent type agencies such as the Metropolitan Cou-ncil and appro- priate state agencies. We suggest the followi�ng areas for further study/act.ion: . a) Determine the inf.luence that l.ending institutions have in dictating the design, lot and house si.ze and amenities that are included in housing be.ing produced today.• b) Development of advisory zoning and sub-divisio.n standards and/or PUD Guidelines which are adequate to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents whieh will help to lower the front end cost of utilities and housing which will balance density by the strategic placement of open space and, at the same time,,will not incr-ease u�- keep and maintenance problems nor increase the costs of home ownership in general. �'� C� � Labor and builder practices in this area as compa ed to other areas of the country and its impaet on t e cost of housingo Det�rmi�e if there really is a maxket far madest ost affordable single family detaehed housing and if uch housing can be produeed without heavy s�bsidizati n. e}. Multi-family standards and requirements. f) An anal'ysis should be made of the cost of housing utilizing innovative labor practices and �age rat s versus the cost of such housing�built under prese t conditians and praetiees. The AMM Board af Direetors does not support the conti tion of the MCHC. It is the feeling af the AMM Board Directars that the MCHC, principally because of it be compased mostly of individuals representing speeial i ests, can never bring the necessary objectivity which needed �a address a problem as crz�ica2 as the housin problem. Also, it appeared to us, as we abserved the in operatian, that some sensi�ive issues could no� ef tively be examined because of the interdependence and con�inued need for good working relationsh�ps between of the interest graups represented. This is not �ean personal criticism of any of the present members of t committee. Quzte �o the eontrary, we recognize that members of the eommittee labored long and hard and de endless hours of their personal time in responding to legislative directive as they perceived this direetiv be, However, it is ou.x feeling that a sub�eet so di cult, complex and sensitive as is this housing issue can not be addressed in a forum that accentuates the versary roles and could raise the spectacl,e of retrib tion by one group or another. ua- of ng ter- is MCHC ec- the some as e as� oted th e ta fi- ust d- � IIT. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS There are no easy or simplistic solutions to making decent h.ousing available for persons with low and moderate incomes with the cur- rent economic conditionsa The .AMM�B:o.a•rd.�.q� V�i�AG�tp.r�s i�. concerned with the report and the recommendations put forth by the MCHC for several reasons. Our concerns are based on the following beliefs: l. The most substantial factors involved in making decent housing affordable to moderate and 1ow income persons are not addressed by the recommendations in a meaningful.way; 2. The report is unbalance�. and unfairly (and unproductively) singles out local units of government as being the principal obstacTe to the production of lower cos.t housing; 3. The housing needs for a large percentage of the low and moder- ate income persons just cannot be met through the traditionaZ single family detached housing market without massive new fed- eral and/or state subsidies beeause of the general economic coriclitions; ' � 4. All�of the "actors" who play a major role in providing housing (government/liuilders/labor, financial institutions and tk�e real estate industry) must start worki�ng cooperatively and each should critically examine�their own practices to see what cost reductions can be made rather than continually trying to assess blame; 5. Building Tower quality housing for one segmen't of our popula� tion because of its financial position would be�an insult. Placing poor people in poor housing has already proven to be a failure by both government and. the private sector; and 6. The present lack local government, ng to those pref tutions have been of modest cost hous rather er_______:__ s�i�f consumer pre and the prac cant contrib g has not been caused by erence, developers orient- ices af financial insti- u�tin� t'ac�tors. Therefore, the major task at hand is to find ways to focus energies and attention on the me�ns to produce quality, attractive (and less costly) multi-family and�single family attached housing in much larger quantities. This task must include, to be successful, a modi- fication of consumer preference�s and attit�.des towards the type of housing and an increased commitment to provide governmental subsidies at increased levels. -11- IA GENERAL I 0 MEETING NOTICE '�IEMBERSH I P MEET I NG OF THE DAKOTA 'COUNTY LEAGUE OF P�UN . THURSDAY, NOVEMBER Ig,. 1976 7:30 P,M, RooM 240 DAKOTA COUNTY AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE EAST 14STH ST. & AKRON RD� ROSEMOUNT . LEGISLATIVE OUTLOOK - 1977 . ��WHAT�S IN STORE FOR DAKOTA COUNTY�S CITIES AND TOWNS�� SPEAKERS; REP� HARRY SIEBEN SEN� HOWARD KNUTS HASTINGS BURNSVILLE RECEN�p �OV 12 1976 �CIPALITIES; TWO OF THE SENIOR MEMBERS OF�THE DAKOTA COUNTY DELEGATION I THE LEGTSL TURE WILL LOOK AHEAD TO THE COMING SESSION� THEY WI L DISCUS SOME OF THE VITAL ISSUES AFFECTING LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND YOU, T E LOCAL OFFICIAL� u IN ADD TION, LEAGUE OFFICIALS WILL ANNOUNCE THE NEW INTERGO ERNMENTAL • COMMUN CATIONS PROGRAM TO BE JOINTLY S�ONSORED 1�lITN THE DAK TP. COUNTY . $OARD� ��OUR INPUT IS INVITED� ALL LO AL OFFICIALS FROM THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY ARE INVITED 0 ATTEND AND PA TICIPATE� ALL CI NEWLY NOT I F1� fY CLERKS ARE URGED TO NOTIFY MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMB RS, AND =LECTED OFFICIALS, AS WELL. ALL TOWN CLERKS ARE URGE TO CHAIRMEN AND SUPERVISORS� ,� . . �,r, ,;�M11 �_;� a�s ,�c,> > �';=__�'_;:�': _�T �_�,°r _:,c: > > �. � r•�•_ x.r; c-�;��r y _�",,, �* - - —_ .» _ � � TdO. Cleared iiomici.de . � 1�anslaughter ' � _ Rape Assault to Rape (Att�mpted} Robbery - Armed �;obbery - Strong Armed 3urglary - Residential Bi�ra3ary _ c3on-residential Lnrceny Au�.o heft TOTAL: Aggrav�ted �ssault Other 73ssaults (Simple) Arsan Forae�y and Counterfe,a.ting Fraud � S�olen Yraperty-P�ssessian, sale, etc. Crimin�l �4mage ta Proper4y(vanda.lism) i•.ea�ons Violations Ot}ier Sex Offenses _ I��rcotics - Opium, Cacaine and ' Derivativ�s � r;arzjuana Synthetic fidda.cting Drugs dther Dang�rous Narcatic Drugs Of��ns�s Against Fami,ly & Cha.ldren D.W.I. Liataor Law Via2ata.ons �runkeness , Disorcer�y Conc3uct All G�her di�enses ' - TOTAL: �SLsnic'.on . , rL:��::_ •s Viol. � :3. a•nd MV Laws Parkin :'iolata.ons - Los ��';: 4:�� Persons � Lo��-%F »nd Property . Los�/F und Tenir�als . LosT/F us;d Ve:�a.cles � Patal �;otax Vehicle Accid�nt 'Person 1• Injury `1dV Accident • H& R ersonal Injury MV Accident Proper y Danage MV Accident Ii & R ropeacty bamage ]�9V Acciclent I'ublic �,cciden�s-Falls, Drownings, Etc_ , Home & Occupational ficc.-Fal].s,Burns,Etc. Sick C red For "I•iental 'Case Suicid Fir�ar s Accidents 1 3 2 6 12 2 "�'i:;i].:Ii, ] :3'JG L�ss , Recov�red $1 25.p0 -0- 1 49.00 -Q- 1 77.00 -0- $3 SI.00 -0-. _. 5 1 1 3 17 41 2I 4 1 1 1 5 7 1 4 1 � �• . � � Suddcn Peath & Bodic:s Found �:nirral �ites DOJTIG'S't lC Alarms-Residential Rlarms-lvon-�esidential� Public Assists . l�iscellane us Service - Public Initiated I�3iscellane us Service - Officer Initiated r ires TOTAL IJo ; 1 _ 1- "10 4 20 37 30 13 276• Clc_,�r I•:an Hours (approx.) 1,500 ?�iiles �riv n (approx.) 14,000 Fublic Con acts (approx.) 350 Tra�fic Ci�ations 40 Jur�nile i�: rninas 8 �ehicle Re air and Adult . i•;arning ickets � 4 Oroir,ance iolation S�.�rinons 1 ?votes and emarks " � A total 0 160 man hours was devoted to training during October, 1976. O ficers_ Plath, Bridger, Munson and Sgt. Wicks attended a 40 hour Psychology for P lice Course �onducted y the Da]:ota County Police Training Coordinator. ' � � r t CSTY C7F MEt3Dt?TA HEIGIiTS � TQ: � November I6, 3976 City Council FROI�: Orvil J. Johnson � City Administratar . Public t�orks Salaries 1976 and 1977 Proposals i met wi.th Larry Bastion, Business Aqen�. for Loca1 320, represe ting the Pub ic Works employees on Tuesday, I3ovember 16 to attempt for the t'rd time to tork out satisfactary campensation for the Publ.ic Works employees. At this� lat date, a number of contrac�.s in surresunding mtznicipaiities have een signed and the following figures for 1976 represent virttzally identical ar angements as hase prevailing in ather municipalities. 'I'he following chart i subrnitteda` for your consideration and action: ' �/]Jp . � 1 1975 � t + (Existinr�) 1976 1977 ' Ho �tenance Man A {lst 6 mos.} tenance Man B (Top ) ce Contribution i�alization Only) s $5.18/hx. 5.57fhr. 5 . 9I. jhr . s9.s4/mo. 10 $5.68/hr. 6.47jhr. 6.42/hr. 60.00/mo. maximum 10 $6�01/hr. 6�40fhr. 6 75/hr. 65 �OOlmo. Th total salary��r�c� insurance cost for �he 1976 proposal is �bout $60.00 a year le s than the �9�ra--agreement in the me�ro area. The percentage i crease for sa ary and insurance over 1975 amounts to�$I,288 ar 10.7� increase. The metro- wi e 49ers increase was less percen�age--wise because �Gheir 1975 sa aries were hi her than Utzrs.' {In other words, our catch up �o very nearly th 49er agreement ob iously was a-higher peraentage than far other municipalities.) I am satisfied th � the 1976 agreenent is fair an both sicles. It is "slightly law r than We � St. Paul a:rid�slightly higher than Eagan. Both commun:ities ha e sat in me iation to arrive at their agreements. You will note that the 1975 proposal includes a$60.00 per mo th tribution for health insurance as compareci to $39.84 for I9?5. �.'his is ri.ved at �aith this rationale : a. The $60.00 makes the City contribution consistent wi that af t�e offi.ce emplay�es and police employees; .r ► c lic Works Salaries -2- November 16, 1976 � b. The $6.07 compensation (Top Maintenance Man) is low than the metro-wide rate of $6.19 -- the difference equaling our additional $20.00 contribution over th 49er amount of $40.00 for insurance. The 1977 proposal represents a 5.5� increase on salaries, an increase $65.00 on insurance contribution and an eleventh holiday -- a loating iday. This proposal does several things: a. Most of the present talk, prior to any settlements includes a 5.5� increase as a starting point. b. The $65.00 insurance contribution makes the insurance contribution uniform for all Mendota Heights employees; and c. The eleven�holidays will grant the Public FJorks employees the same number as the police and equal many other communities. The above figures were arrived at with due deliberation in th of the unsettled year. It appears to me that the 1976 fig adopted without change because they are virtually identical t tlements and a settlement at this date is none to early. I b 5.5� increase in salary and additional $5.00 per month insur tribution for 1977 is very reasonable and the eleventh holida al benefit with the Police. For these brief reasons, I urge roval of the above two-year Public Works salary schedule. I s afternoon that our Public Works employees agreed to these f with a unanimous vote. The initiation of eleven holidays for the Public Works and even holidays for police department personnel would indicate liday schedule for non-union personnel should be increased al ►A e eleventh es should other ieve that makes for s informed ures, but e existing t the 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO November 16, 1976 . City Council : G.M. Radabaugh � Clerk-Treasurer CT: Change of Election Polling Place I am sure that many of you are aware of the problems we have he past several elections due to the placement of two precinct p t one location. I am, of course, referring to Precincts I and 4 �cated at Somerset School. On November 2, there was a combined ,523 registered voters in these two precincts. Those of you who ither precinct at the recent election no doubt can understand at �rtion of ovr concerns. ' .� . �, � � ` faced in �lling places both being total of voted in least a O::e of our concerns was traffic control. We had to contact e police :veral times during the day to control both traffic and parking uses within ie parking lot and at the parking lot entrance and exit. The un vailability � one large room within the school for each polling place forced us to again ;e the gym as the location for both polling places. This result d in �ngestion, sometimes extreme, at the entrance to the school, in e hallway, � the stairway leading to the gym, and within the gym itself, though our �dges and peace officers did their best to control the flow of v ters into the �m and tried to direct the voters to their proper precinct table , it was an ipossible task. In many cases, people stood in line at the wron precinct bles to wait for ballots and then had to be redirected to their proper �ecinct location. In many cases, voters attempted to return the'r voted .11ots to the wrong precinct ballot box. 2'his situation was imp ssible to ntrol, consequently we ran the risk of ballots being dropped::in the wrong llot �ox��-, of people standing within the area between the pY�ec'nct ta.bles and ny other -situations which could have caused severe problems aft r the polls osed or which could have been considered violations of the Stat election laws. Again, �he alertness of the election judges and peace office wledge of proper election procedures and their very hard work ht have been severe problems. The judges should not be expect olved a.n any more than minimal crowd control. They should not the cramped conditions that occurred on November 2. They shou ected to perform the normal duties of election judges. Zdost i shoulc�...nct allow a condition which could be criticized by r-epr Secretary of State's Office or which could result in the brea election laws. �s, their �revented what d to be be subjected d only be portantly, sentatives of ing of any of This memo just touches the surface of our concerns. I am co vinced that e location of both polling places within the same building shou d not again allowed. Therefore, I am herewith requesting direction and au ority to gin searching for a new location for one of the precinct pollin places. 0 CITY OT' MrND� IIEIGIITS GENLP�III, FUND Year 1976 Statement of Cash Receipts Date Octo er Revenues Monthly , Year to Estimated Anticipated ' Revenues nate Revenues Revenues General Property Taxes $ $153,625.05 $361,200.00 $207,574.'95 Da!:ota County 12oad &]3ridge Levy 43,000.00 43,000.00 State I�ids � 151,589.92 154,510.00 2,920.08 �•iS�'� I�laintenance 2,500.00 2,500.00 � -�- Licenses, Permits & Other Revenues i•ialt Beverage & Liquor ' Joy C:ontractors Cigarette :3icycle i:Labisll 3uilding� '.•,ater & Plumbing . .•;ell Gas FIeating �'ireworks & Incinerator �og Impounding Se�,��er Permits 5��:: er Rentals :,ezoninq C.L.T.A. ' 19.50 250.00 1,556.00 284.00 10.00 . 10.00 105.00 12,637.30 670.00 1,833.23 r 560.00 777.00 3,625.00 60.00 74.00 171.00 13,475.00 1,695•.50 394.00 20.00 255.00 1,172.00 78,663.18 4,405.00 26,777.42 600.00 1,000.00 3,300.00 130.00 200.00� 300.00 10,000.00 1,700.00 50.00 800.00 20.00 650.00 800.OQ 87,000.00 1,200.00 4f300.00 40.00 223.00 325.00* 70.00 • • � • 126.00 129.00 3,475.00* 4.50 50.00 406.00 -0- 395.00 372.00* 8,336.82 3,205.00* 22,477.42* F'; ling S+�reet Charges �a?e of �'lccident Reports, Maps, and Ordinances Court Fines Fire Calls & Contracts I�lterest Ir�come Sundry Project Reimbursement `_2�creation Programs Assessment Search Interceptor Maintenance Surcliar9e -State of hlinnesota S��C - i�letropolitan Sewer IIoard Trunk Sewer & Debt Service Transfer :•:etrpi�olitan Sewer Debt. :.�ederal Revenue Sharing Transfer Special Police Fund Transfer Fund Balance 1lpprop. CITY OF MENllO�� H�IGI-iTS Cash Receipts Con't. Date October 1976 • Monthly Year to �stimated Anticipated Revenues Date Revenues Revenues $- 14.00 56.05 716.50 386.25 2,570.80 6.00 ' 933.00. 318.30 2,800.00. Tota1 General Fund Revenues 25,175.93 Total Fevenues over �stimated Revenues $ 18.00 150.00 674.86 7,732.49 6,900.00 1,536.54 10,378.74 289.98 746.50 140.00 6,074.00 1,979.26 25,200.00 $ 20.00 $ 2.00 300.00 150.00 220.00 454.86* 6,000.00 1,732.49* . 6,500.00 400.00* 2,300.00 763.46 6,500.00 3,878.74* 12,000.00 11,710.02 1,500.00 753.50 '�- 140.00* 5,500.00 574.00* . 1,000.00 976.26* 15,000.00 10,200.00* 3�,000.00 • 34,000.00 16,444.03 32,600.00 16,155.97 20,000.00 20,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2�,500.00 24,500.00 518,103.47 $845,200.00 �<< G 375,310.30 48,213.77* 3 , . � t, Lxpenditures �'��i�inistration Personal Services �:ayor & Councilmen Full Time � Temoorary Contractual Services City nttorney Fees P.etainer Prosecutions City �ngineer Retainer C� ty l�ccountant Building Inspector Fees Retainer Gas Inspector :•,'Ged Inspector J �og Catcher Telephone Pualications, Books Lauipment Leases Office Rental liospitalization I:Zsurar.ce CITY OF MEND� _ Ii�IGI-ITS � Year 1976 � 1ldministration �xpenditures Date October 1976 Monthly Year to 1976 Unexpended i?xpenditures Date Budget Balance - , $ 525.00 8,812.72� 9,337.72. 450.00 196.25 147.12 191.28 880.00 1,339.21 $ 5,250.00 83,399.48 :: .�• �:, 279.48 3,000.00 9,084.36 2,400.00 7,500.00 4,500.00 245.00 1,552.50 1,500.50 648.52 1,738.50 8,800.00 12,182.97 12,369.83 $ 6,300.00 97,510.00 5,050.00 1�0a,3G0.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 7,000.00 r 2,400.00 7,500.00 9,000.00 700.00 350.00 Z,2oo.oe 1,�;OO.00 1,000.00 1,750.00 11,500.00 11,160.00 20,000.00 $ 1,050.00 14,110.52 ,5,050.00 20,210.52 4,720.52 1,000.00 (2,084.36) -0- . -0- 4,500.00 455.00 350.00 647.50 299.50 351.48 11.50 2,700.00 (1,022.97) 7,630.17 i i. CITY OF MENDU�1'A H�IGHTS 1ldministration �xpenditures Con't. Date October 1976 Monthly Year to 1976 Unexpended on rac a ervices, on �xpen �.0 res a e u ge a ance Custodial Cammodities Office Supplies i�ei�airs & T�laintenace �'os tage Other Charges Conferenc�s, Schools & Conventions ��s u Subscriptions :?zleage T�.lection Expenses Surcharges - State S::C ,- i•Ietropolitan City Share of PLR11 City Share of FICA Sundry �og Pound Fees Capital Outlay $ $ 125.00 $ 200.00 $ 75.00 3,803.86 65,926.68 85�560.00 19,633.34 • 200.79 1,472.69 2,500.00 1,027.31 � , 202.26 � 500.00 2g�.�4 118.82 582.73 600.00 17.27 319.61 2,257.68 3,600.00 1,342.32 450.62 267.40 1,134.46 of Minnesota 841.58 Sewer �oard 3,118.50 � 2,812.46 2,550.54 47. 73. 1,337.97 2,518.98 2,167.30 2,522.87 2,011.71 23,463.00 26,456.79 9,646.12 16,823.11 1,200.00 3,000.00 - 2,500.00 2,200.00 1,000.00 15,000.00 34,900.00 9,200.00 1,700.00 (137.97) 481.02 332.70 (322.87) (1,011.71) (8,463.00) 8,443.21 (446.12) (15,123.11) 137.50 580.50 600.00 19.50 ' ' ' ' 71,300.00 6, 28. 5 r'c�uipment 1,000.00 , 1,000.00 Contingency '� 3,200.00 3,200.00 4,200.U0 � - Total ndministration Expenditures ,� - ' ► �7%r �2,�� - QO 29 .157 . 83 e •••r�••• - yu+ena�+ti�i.�""��.�."�s,...Jr+iV+.'wc+:Nw.'.�.M+..«.r,JL..AY.i{.T':6E� M'c�lVitaf3?�YIiIY�V'�+�+�w!!��-1wr+.�►+��• , CITY OF NL�N. � IIEIGIiTS Police Department �xpenditures Date October 1976 Monthly Year to 1976 . Unexpended Expenditures �xpenditur�s Date IIudget �alance Personal Services Salaries Overtime C�f f ice Clerk Temporary Contractual Services Te?ephone Conferences, Z•;est St. Paul Tnsurance $ 12,854.84 $114,346.62 �159,370.00 $37,121.38 2��,�4 3,720.00 1,500.00 (2,220.00) 260.00 2,702.00 5,200.00 , - 1 ,392.58 ► • 1G0,�70.00 , . ' 108.13 1,103.99 1,000.00 (103.99) Schools, & Dues 25.00 111.71. 700.00 588.29 Dispatching 9,061.80 9,600.00 538.20 936.00 530.00 (406.,00) • �1,213.50 11,830.00 • Commodities Supplies , Gasoline & Oil ruto ,Repairs P.aclio Repairs Gther Repairs & DZaintenance & Alaintenance & AZaintenance Other Charges 309.51 �,462.66 1,400.00 (1,062.66) 424.48 7,303.34 �,500.00 196.66 398.56 4,751.35 6,500.00 1,748.65 473.25 150.00 (323.25) 381.21 200.00 (181.21) 1,132.55 � 15,371.81 15,750.00 • Car t�Tashings 290.00_ 350.00 60.00 Clothing Allowance . 1,816.65 1,800.00 , (16.65) Sundry 304.80 1,381.79 300.00 (1,081.79) :•`�?eage 600.00 600.00 304 80 3• 88 3.050 00 � (4�R 44) Capital Outlay Squad Cars Qtl�er Equipment 9,253.12 7,200.00 (2,053.12) 19.63 3,284.44 1,980.00 (1,304.44) 19.63 ► • r 9,180.00 (3,357.56) Total� Police Dept. rxpendituresl4,982.69 168,579.93 ��^nn,�g.pYp�p_ , . CITY OI' MENL , 1iT'IGIITS t Fire Department Expenditures Date October .�976 ' Lxpenditures Personal Services Chief & 1lssistant Volunteer Firemen Contractual Services Telephone Iieat & �lectricity Conferences, Schools, & Dues [�test St. Paul Dispatching Insurance Commodities Supplies ,Gasoline & Oil Fire Lquip. Itepairs & Maintenance Otlzer Lquipment Repairs & i�Iaint. Radi� �quip. Repairs & Maint. Other Charges Snot�� Plowing I'iremen' s Driveways Sundry Luilding Maintenance Monthly Year to 1976 Unexpended rxpenditures Date Budc�et Balance $ 739.00 ' $ 5,234.50 $ �,880.00 $ 3,645.50� 35.00 5,975.00 12,320.00 6,345.00 774.00 11,209.50 21,200.00 ► • . 60.58 _ 25.00 302.10 400.00 97.90 1,037.53 1,650.00 612.47 890.88 1,700.00 809.12 1,200.00 1,200.00 -p- 107.50 1,109.70. 1,900.00 790.30 193.08 4,540.21 6�85'0.00 2,309.79 102.82 - 720.96 1,300.00 579.04 9.66 422.56 �00.00 (22.56) 334.53 3,019.51 24.60 352.19 3,500.00 39.73 88.57 ' � ' S,200.00 596.21 . 890.00 1,000.00 110.00 66.23 �00.00 333.77 573.80. 750.00 176.20 1,530.03 2,150.00 • Fire righting� I:quipment 2, 712 . 00 4,��OO .O C� 1, 788 . 00 2,712.00 ��,500.00 r • Total Fire Department �xpenditures �'1,438.69 �'24,595.53 ' ' 15,304.47 czTx or r��7D� �i�z�r��rs Road & Bridge Department �xpenditures Date October 1976 � Monthly Year to 1976 Unexpended I l:xpenditures �xpenditures Uate l3udqet Balancc i Personal Services ; Salaries Overtime Seasonal Contractual S�rvices Telephone tieat & �lectricity Commodities ' Supplies Gasoline & Oil Lquipment Repairs & Maintenance Other Charges Street Signs & Posts Street Sand & Salt •'Street Oiling & Sea1 Coat Street Cleaning Road Fill - Asphalt -- �quipment Rental Building riaintenance Building Rental $2,471.00 $31,334.00 $ 44,700.00� $13,366.00 1,077.00 2,000.00 923.00 240.00 2,500.00 2,260.00 2,471.00 32,651.00 49,200.00 16,549.00 109.35 � 150.00 , 40.65 20.19 857.71 750.00 (107.71) 20.19 967.06 900.00 (67.06) 155.58 1,117.41 3,000.00 1,882.59 261.97 2,691.49 2,700.00 8.51 93.46 2 487.59 3,000.00 512.41 511.01 6,296.49. 8,700.00• 2, 03.5 77.74 775.28 275.72 225.00 960.70 712.65 11,985.19 3,012.00 4,163.39 2,399.24 2,597.00 7.26 2,250.00 1,200.00 2,500.00 18,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 �00.00 1,500.00 2 39 . 30 1,787.35 6,014.81 (1,012.�00) (2,562.63) (597.00) 492.74 (750.00) Rubbish Removal 252.00 511.00 150.00 (361.00) ' 382.93 G00.00 217.07 1,605.74 28,981.36 2,15 . 0� . • Capital Outlay New �quipment 596.39 1,000.00 403.61 . • 1,000.00 • Total Road & I3ridge Dept. �xPenc�.$4,607.94 $ , . $ 92,250.00 $ � • r. CITX OI' M�N17��A II�IGIiTS �'ublic Util.ities Department T'xnenditures Da�� Octaber 1976 Lxpenditures Monthly Year to 1976 Unexp�nded , Salaries Ov�rtim� & t�Teekend Du�y Seasonal Contractual. Services '1`ele�hone Heat s�� Llectricity Li�t Station L;lec�ricity Street Lighting $ 763.0{}. $ 9►989.Q0 $13r3i�(}.40 $ 3r311.Q0 -' � 244.00 2,953.Op. ��$��•d� (153.00) 1,000.00 ' 1jOQ0.QQ 1,007.00 I2,942.00 , 17,3.00.00 4,15$.00 " 46.80 24.20 147.55 179.45 664.51 600.00 (64.51) 394.77 650.00 255.23 1,623.24 2►30Q.04 676.76 2,305.16 2.GOO.Q4 294.84 Commodities -- � Supplies 62.47 1,682.04 2,000.00 , 31?.96 Gasoline & Oi7. 521.10 850.00 328.90 L•`quipment Repaa.rs & Maintenance Z� r� . g� 3 41. 0 7 1. , IO 0• 0 4 75 8. 9 3 Ilead itouse Maintenance 14.Q0 83.50 300.00 2I6.50 Lift S�ation Maintenance 266.19 1,000.00 733.81 , 635.38 7,8$1.58 ��j�.��.�� 3,518.42 Othex Charqes IIydran� Rer�tal. ]iydran� R�pairs ilydrant Wa�.er 12eadings 5,580.fl0 5,&00.00 20.00 �.,000.oa i,000.00 200.00 200.00 Eguipment I�en�als 256.67 806.67 804.00 (6,67} I2u}�laish R�moval 126.00 lOq.Op (26.00) ��iSi3 Charges 20,493.Q2 112,711.6]. 123,QQ0.00 10,288.39 Sundry 296.80 ' 1,348.37 . 50Q.00 {848.37} `1'raffic Sig'nal Operat3.ons & Maint. 67.23 6p1.69 8d0.00 19$.31 , • + • + - ► • Capital Outlay i�eca �quipment - Ta�.al l�ublic Utilities De�at. 212.25 SqO.OQ 287.75 212.25 504.00 . . Exp�ndi��ures $22,756.10 $142,2].Q.17 $161,OOQ.00 $ 8� • � s .. � CITY OF MEND4Tl1. HESGI-iT� Planning Commission �xpendi.tures Date p�tober 1976 ��r�enditures z,1 Y T:xpendztures t�at� Budc�et I3alance Cantractual Services City Planner Retainer Pro�essional Fees 4ther Gasts Other Costs Total Planning Cammission �xpendi�ures $1,000.00 $10,q00.00 $ ].2,0OO:OQ $2,000.00 29.73. 758.76 2,504.00 1,74i.24 1�5��7.�- 10,758.76 1�,5Q0.00 3,741.24 � I.384.38 • 500.�0 (884.39) 1.,384.38 500.00 (884.39) , •12,143.14 • 15,OQ0.00 , � CI'1'Y OI' M�N1. � fI�ICIITB . , I'arks & Recreata.on Depaactment �xpenditures Date October 1976 F�xpenditures Monthly ' Year. to 19'76 Unexpended T"xp�ncli�ures Dat� IIuclqPt ��l�n�� Personal Services Salaries Overtime T�mporary :�Iaintenance �:ecreatian $2,260.00 $24,002.00 $ 32,0OO.Op $7,998.00 5.00 146.Q0 500.00 354.00 CETA ' $00.00 , 5,895.68 (5,895.68) 2,5Q0.04 2,500.40 ' 8,830.35 10,200.00 1,3$9.65 3,065.00 38,854.03 �:S��O�,UO 6,345.97 Con�.rac�ual, Services Prafessional Consultant Telephone liea� & L•'lectricity Commodities Supplies, Recreation Supplies , S�ark � �ascaline & 011 .•Lguipm�nt Re�airs & Maintenance Otiier Charges L•'quzpment Rentals & Leases Rubbislz Removal Sundry 200.00 200.00 16.16 349.32 500.00 150.68 52.9Q 1,565.38 2.200.�C' 63h.62 • 1,914.70 �,9q0.00 8 •�i 641.81 70Q.00 58.19 . 78.71 . 2,894.05, �,000.00 1,105.95 �623.15 700.00 76.85, 341.66 2 688.0� 2,lOt}.C10 {588.Q4} • 6,847.05 i,5G�.00� • 205.31 1,056.72, 1,8Qf�.00 7��.2g , loo.00 _ �oo.00 �oo.ao 543.46 ,OO.Op (43.46) Z2ecreation Pragrams 9�9.40 1,500.00 ��-.�� Ilydrant Wa�er Reada,ngs 19.35 500.58 5�p,pp 49.42 SCilOOlS %� �o i nn nn 7fl _(ltl - ^ 224.66 3, 7 . �,8�0.00 , . � � CITY OF MENDt}TI� �I�IGIiTS � Parks & Recreation De�t. �xpenditures Con't, Date October 1976 f......�. .....� Expendi�ures 1�Sonthl Yea� to . , , �xpenditure� Dat� Budget T3alance Shad� Tree Proc�ram � , Equipment Rental _ 2,'650.00 � 3,146.07 Reolacement - Tree� $ $ 31.50 $1,q00.00 $(2,177.57) - r • ' 3,I77,57 1,000.00 {2,177.57} � Capital Outlay �ew �quipment $ $ 1,313.57 $1,400.00 $ 86.43 1,313.57 1,�00.00 86.43 Total Parks � Recreation Dept. Lxp�nditure� $6,429.Q9 $55,286.68 $G2,850.00 $ � c 0 � e � lixpendituret3 General I'und l�dministration Police Fire Public Works Streets Utilities Parks Planning CITY Or MEND. I-I�IGI3TS General I'und � Y�ar 1976 Date October 1976 Total Expenditures Monthly Year to 1976 Unexpended �xp�nditures Date I3L?dget Lal�nce $24,821.98 14,982.69 1,438.69 4,607.94 22,756.10 6,429.09 1,029.73 $244,362.17 168,579.93 24,595.53 69,492.30 142,210.17 55,286.68 12,143.14 $ 273,520.00 $ 29,157.83 200,680.00 32,100.07 39,900.00 15,304.47 92,250.00 22,757.70 161,000.00 18,789.83 G2,Q50.00 7,563.32 15,000.00 2,856.86 Total General Fund Expenditures $76,066.22 $716,669.92 $ 845,200.00 $ ► • � t. . � � -� .� s� � � �1 � d 2j c� �c� n-� � '� J�. � �1 •GI h� 0 .'"� `2a.� Q_ f'1' f'l -� C� n. �-�.-��.�. � a � �,� t�i�l�>��...� a� Cl� �n�'� � � �`�' � �t t ��. : �+� � 't�c�{-.f ..�no�� -�-� � _�r� �,+c�� I �� c�(�1 � o � � •� � U C�r b�„ ?.� � �t � i c�� c� � a 21 � tn d ��.�, �.CY o �' , "'j l., �1 ,� � ' �p �r Q ct � tn•t �� s 4. + C7 , � � ..�..+J d Q'1 �-�(� d,, . h.^� � �-�► � � o �°7C`� I '�'.�. �t-v � a C�r'� � � �� t �� ► '�IL�i S�r ` '�o �+� a�t11�� s.c�� ._ _ __ _ __ _- •�y � W -;�i S t��.L ! t� c� �+ �t �- "� o J .J 1�,�.� �v' ' �-.�v'� 1 v�c� .i � i-� "'�fi-):� .� ��..1 w?�S �, 4� �h� +h �v v "1 d t'd i ,�, "�lv� � � ".� "�„�..-�, �~�'1 d W o � 1."� �v Gt� ��n ��-.�t � ~vQ� ..� � � � �.� Q-�. � d w a � S w� �.1, , � � 'b� .�..�a � �`�� , r-v� �-ti+ �r� S w�..�. t 'v' c� n (�r v-�^, � � -t c'�' �'J ' �1 � ..�. -� � c� t�ro � ...i � ! c� ;''c�..� � � •a�ss-��a�� r r�e�d. �.i� � rt 1 s-� �-�c� �.� o Q�ao .. � � "S +�d�.�. ► c��-� (�c�� 1 c��c� d�.� � �� wo � 1.��cru c� W . � , _%��:�. _.�„ ..� _`��l�C1C�'� �aC'?�Zi�.�, , -� '� � .2„-�7 ca o ' � �� i� �� ii ��°°�� f - ��G g �s f, nop�(`" �`% ��t�'7 �R S a'7 �OCXJ OZ�i ' � �� . � Q�� '� Z� � �?� � �+°i� ao � an.S�i�^ � p� t7QW� ��,7 . ��, � �� -� c�o . .. oov ,S2 � n4 , �,�Qol � � 2 � a s�+��.� .� J °� �°b�b�2 bao' nQ �S�� o �o � /�Z' �Q 1��Q8Z �`�� `�� - �Lt,b�2 �-o a�.�' � z ��- � _ _ n�°�S`S�2�� .�,�a 1 oZ� � -'?� 71 (J/1 C1 I� 11 �.r� W I.� S �.--�� , "�.y � �� 4 ' '�: �S1�i�� r�, � t^1 i �"`r.3 1 S"5t � •,� ~�t�+ � ' �, S� N� t� �1-�, �� y 1�i . • � a � a CYc'�� ,� �� x,-,�� j� � � ��v_s �-�� w 1 • s1� , �, , �. �� '�(, { '� el �+ ►v�-�� 1 � s.�� :�-�1. �-�. � �-,�� W � _ � „�„� �'_Q „� �--_